If they bother to bring you in at all they've probably got your azz nailed and are only tryin to provide context for the DA to further leverage against you.
@William Knight the fact is, he was so happy to have murdered a guy that he needed to brag about it with the interrogators. And that's exactly how you tell a ruthless killer from a person who just temporarily snapped and made a stupid decision.
T W2021-12-22 03:24:03 (edited 2021-12-22 03:29:04 )
Never consent to police interrogation. Wait for your lawyer. You have your day in court. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
Wrong lesson. The lesson you should have learned is "don't talk to cops" not "now I have a better understanding of what cops are saying when they talk to me"
@V -yrz The guy carries a gun with him when he's doing errands around his neighbourhood. He's lived his whole life waiting for his moment to "justify" murdering someone. How quickly he pulled out the "21 foot rule" implies he was hoping someone would act threateningly within 21 feet of him at some point in his life. This was like hitting the jackpot for this guy.
Like when a women says " i just want to know what happen... majority of the time she already knows, she just wants to see if your going to lie to her face
exactly what the judge said. I dont think he was even going into the store. I am certain he just drives by just to check if someone was there just to go start sh*t.
@Max 404 He didn't need the handicap spot. Even if he did, the open parking spaces in front of the store are much closer than the handicap spots anyway. And if he thinks they're violating the law then he should call the cops. Parking illegally then approaching their car is the wrong thing to do, even if they were illegally parked in the handicap spot
This is a perfect example of mind your own business on the shooters side, and fuck around and find out on the victims side. They were both wrong. Had the victim not immediately resorted to physical assault (what if the guy was just asking directions, and just because he’s talking to your old lady you assault him) then he could have likely avoided being shit. And if the shooter had not made it his business to enforce parking at a fucking gas station the whole situation could have been avoided.
@Melinda Mahoney we don't know details of the level of confrontation between the shooter and the lady. Either the victim assumed that the guy is threatening his wife or he could hear some threat from inside the shop... else why did he come and push that guy to the ground without even talking to the guy! I wish ppl just remain calm during any argument... anger blinds the mind... unnecessary loss of life when it could have ended with just a simple argument. This is the bad aspect of owning firearms...anger + easy access to a weapon is a dangerous combination
@Max 404 there's a difference between retirement and simply not working anymore. And even if that's true there's not a single argument that could be used to justify his actions. None.
@Dj Pierce Well, that's what JCS said. A lot of arguments have been made in the court case. The case is not as clear as day.
1 like
Max 4042022-04-27 19:28:35 (edited 2022-04-27 19:28:49 )
@Shotty If good people mind their own business, bad people win. But one has to be cautious, when confronting bad or stupid people. Sometimes two idiots meet and things go downhill fast.
These type of people have a superior complex. They believe that they are better than others and have a right to tell people what they believe is right.
Pedro Reis2022-05-11 16:22:16 (edited 2022-05-11 16:30:21 )
So going back if the other person just push him that hard to the ground injury this one iam guessing we won't be here watching and writing about this.... than probably it's how always should be treated throwing someone to the ground that hard( like imagine when you get involved in something like that). The handicapped place is there not for selfish or lazy people use them. Perchance. Most certain he don't like black people and shouldn't NEVER shoot to kill....
@christian Michael Drejka started a commotion and ended up in jail.His behaviour was foolish.Now he has lost his freedom and is in a world of regret for his unneccessary,unwanted actions.
@Max 404 in the vid you can hear him describing the altercation and saying when the women in the car asked ïs it any of your business" the shooter responded acording to him with "no but if my handicapped mother would have droven up it would be" so im going to assume he was not planning to stand there himself
@TerribleZebra Yes, that became clear during the trial.
0 likes
Herbert West2022-05-31 09:41:58 (edited 2022-05-31 09:47:42 )
@Shotty Drejka wasn't "talking" to her, he was yelling and swearing at her, to the point where other customers, both coming OUT of the store and going in ALL stopped to watch and listen (they testified to this at the trial). If he had been speaking in a calm, polite manner I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have paid the least bit of attention. And he didn't need to touch the car. He had her trapped by standing blocking the door and he was speaking in a threatening manner which is part of the reason why he was convicted, because he instigated the entire incident. He is NOT the parking lot police. It's not his property so he had no right to walk over and say ANYTHING. In doing so he became the aggressor.
@lavya p Several witnesses testified at trial that Drejka was very loud and threatening. 2 of them immediately told the store owner and who they (correctly) assumed to be the woman's husband, Marquis, what was happening outside. If Drejka was a friendly man commenting on what a nice day it was or something then he wouldn't have been shoved to the ground.
@Max 404 We all get to choose what battles are worth fighting for, and in this case, he should've erred on the side of caution & safety. It was only a matter of time before this wannabe cop made a bad decision. He will learn all about fear & pain. He claims that he's never been in a fight, good luck with that in prison.
It’s not necessarily YT. According to a Reddit thread, JCS started pulling videos off their own Patreon over a year ago saying the hosting fees were too high. Meanwhile according to the Reddit posters, hosting fees were only a few hundred dollars and they had 40k subscribers each paying at least 1 USD a month. You do the math. Allegedly when people called them out on it they deleted messages and blocked users. This all seems very odd.
@Charlie Brown He took all that patreon money and ran, it's blatantly obvious. Youtube isn't "giving him problems", he's just done with the channel but won't admit it.
Views started reaching like 80 million and he just bounced.
@Charlie Brown what are hosting fees? It’s seems just as stupid as the idiots being interrogated in these videos because for someone who can make a very good living off of literally narrating an already made video(interrogation) which doesn’t seem like it would be incredibly time consuming and back breaking to just decide to stop when clearly the potential for an outstanding amount of money to be made seeing as some of these videos are viewed in the tens of millions!!
@Melissa Coulter Hosting fees are what you pay to Patreon to keep your content on their platform. JCS isn’t just one person, it’s a group of people and the ex Patreon members seem to think they got greedy and couldn’t agree on how to split the money fairly, so they are at an impasse when it comes to continuing with their content.
@christian yup, many more videos of his on the “J C S” channel, and even on here but they’re unlisted, just type in this yt channels name and you’ll find playlists full of more videos than the one shown on this channel
@christian I just recently found a channel "explore with us". It reminds me of this channel I think it's pretty good. You may or may not like it but worth checking out and of course there's "That Chapter" as well. Hope this helps you find something you enjoy
thank you everyone who recommended I'll check them all out. I'll be working an overnight shift next week while our usual overnight person goes on vacation. this will really help. really appreciate it!
@Lee Davies I don't know if he did the right thing, however, I believe under US law he should have been dismissed. I have seen far more unprovoked cases beat the wrap.
I wouldn't say he's trying to seem "smart". He's trying to sound like law enforcement or military and I'm sure you know what people say about "Military Intelligence" (it's an oxymoron). Basically he's trying to talk like a cop/military to build rapport.
I don't know if the guy ever served in the military but that's just how we talk over a radio for the purpose of clarity. Yes and no are both single syllable meaning a split second of RFI can prevent clear reception - so we use "Affirmative" and "Negative" instead. Over static it's easier to tell the difference.
Same reason we use a phonetic alphabet over the radio because the letters "A", "J", "K" all rhyme; letters "B", "C", "D", "E", "G", "P", "T", "V" and "Z" all rhyme and can be mistaken. Instead we use Alpha Charlie Delta Echo Golf Papa - each one sounds distinctly different and that matters when lives are at stake.
Call in the wrong grid coordinates to DIVARTY and you might hit the wrong sector & take out an entire platoon of Rangers. I literally heard exactly that... ALMOST happen one year while on a CAX at 29 Palms. We were in the middle of nowhere; hot as hell; bored as fuck and guarding something I couldn't even see for HOURS. Just making sure nobody passed us on that road and didn't even know why. Our only entertainment was the FM radio so when I heard these excited calls coming over the radio my ears perked up; I sat up in my seat.
@Michael his choice of intervention was to assault him without warning. Mike is a scumbag for his reaction but it was a reaction. Always use your words first if nothing else but to have the excuse of “well I tried to talk it out with him first”
@811chelseafc if someone is verbally assaulting my family I'm going to assault them with proper force and he's not just "a scumbag",he's a convicted murderer... As a grown man I've come to realize no one makes you have any reaction, your in control of that.
@Bossman Biden my thing is this. If someone is verbally assaulting your family, they’re clearly unhinged. Why would you then escalate. You say no one is responsible for their reactions but themselves. Turning a verbal confrontation into a physical one is escalation at its finest.
@liquidbraino If the point is temporal clarity, wouldn't it be better to not use two words that both end in -ive? lol. If you catch the tail end of affirmative or negative they sound the same. It strikes me that "yes yes" and "no no" might be better for that task
@Jek True. But you probably already know what they say about "military intelligence" (it's an oxymoron). Probably still better than saying "Yeah" and "Nah" because both are one single syllable. Personally if I'm listening to a call go out over the radio and all I heard was the last syllable the next thing I'm going to say over the radio is "10-9" or "Say again, you're coming in 10-1; no copy". If I heard them clearly I'm still going to confirm "10-4, I copy that's a NEGATIVE". Just to be clear - IF it's about something super important... like coffee.
He’s a wannabe police officer. When the judge gave reason for his 20 year sentence not the home probation the defense attorneys were requesting was so on point.
@Michael And by intervene you mean physically push someone and escalate the situation? How did that turn out for Markeis? Jacobs was not in any immediate danger and was inside her car. Markeis could have simply walked into the car and both could have driven off without incident. Unfortunately, Markeis pushed a hot headed individual who took SYG literally, got shot and died. Although I'm not blaming Markeis or Jacobs for what occurred, all could have been avoided if they would have parked in a different spot as well.
@Bossman Biden someone is arguing with your wife and you immediately spring to violence? Well, that would make you a criminal. That’s assault, and regardless how blameless you want to make the victims actions, assaulting a man who’s having words with your wife is the behaviour of a thug, it’s not reasonable. This isn’t to say the victim deserved to die, but it could have been completely avoided if he didn’t immediately spring to assault. Nobody here seriously believes that was a reasonable reaction, but they are pretending it is, so that they can maintain the victim/oppressor narrative.
@Michael to be fair, intervening is not just quickly closing the distance and assaulting. Regardless of the law, dude would still be alive had he kept his hands to himself
@Michael if a stranger is arguing with your wife over a parking space, has not threatened physical harm or acted upon it in any way (court documents and evidence show this was the case here, even in Jacobs' own testimony), you DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASSAULT THEM. Had McGlockton not been killed, he would have had assault charges at the very least. You have the right to verbally intervene with the man, but you cannot approach and attack him out of nowhere.
I think he’s more trying to sound/feel like he’s one of them, talk in the cop talk he’s heard on TV, give himself this air of professionalism, he was just doing his job, defending his gas station. And I think he wants very badly to feel like a cop
@Sofian because he's trying to sound like a buddy to the cops. He also uses military lingo when he has never served. It's almost like he learned about those words that day and was going to use them to the fullest extent. Soooo negative sir, it's affirmative this guy is peepee poopoo
When you carry a firearm, you NEVER instigate a conflict. Any fight you participate in becomes a deadly encounter as soon as you pull a gun out. Your job is to avoid confrontations and deescalate as much as possible. Pulling a gun out is your last resort in the face of a threat to you, your family, or your property. If you’re no longer in danger, you no longer have a legal reason to use that firearm.
This guy was looking for a fight so he could live out his mall ninja fantasy and therefore did every single one of those things wrong.
@jacksobrooks lmao. It is truly luck. I've had 3 family members murdered by the police. I wouldn't call it hunting, as much as I would say it's extorting at gun point.
This. People probably don't know, but in the same year this man threatened four other people with his gun over traffic/parking incidences and also caused a crash with a mother and two children with aggressive driving and break checking. He was waiting for this.
@keegan johnson I understand, but you did bring it up. I just don't think that every cop or even close to half of them are chomping at the bit to kill "anyone everyday" as you said.
TBF, The boyfriend shouldn't have pushed him down, he should have slowly walked up and just asked what was going on what they were yelling. Instead he chose to attack Michael.
Well he was just arguing with the lady. Technically her man instigated the whole thing when he put his hands on the other man. However that doesn’t make it right to shoot the man. He was not in any imminent danger. Nobody won this one. Sad outcome.
Politely informing somebody they are parked in the handicapped spot is a decent gesture and even a moral obligation towards the community. The thing is that almost nobody in the world (sadly) will admit to being wrong and correct their mistake, so you better be ready to go on with your life or even accept some hard words from such people (as seen in Cart Narcs). Normally the situation should have ended (even after Drejka was shoved to the ground) in the worst case for the couple, with a parking ticket and a few hard stares. Instead, Drejka's actions were led by anger and ego (since the first moment really) and causd the death of a person. Drejka is guilty but things are not black and white. Edit: I watched a bit more of the video, I fully agreed with the prosecution, justified in pulling the gun, unjustified in pulling the trigger.
@jacksobrooks i can understand the viewpoint (but to clarify i dont really agree 100%, i just can see where he and others are coming from). some people in my family have had bad run-ins with cops, especially one who was beat up really badly by police while he was defenseless. and just recently we got screwed over by a cop who didnt want to do his job after my little brother got jumped in a bathroom and had his phone taken. but i personally havent had any bad encounters with cops knock on wood
@Mr.Krabbb i thought so to. He had time to think, as he saw the gunman and his wife was quarreling and approaching. An ordinary person would walk up and ask what's wrong first. One thing lead to another, and I'm sure had he talked, the firearm would less likely to be pull out.
@ethan Regardless of what you claim the law allows, you shouldn't be able to just shoot someone simply for being on your property. There should have to be other variables that actually present some danger to your physical well being before you go that far in self-defense. But I'm pretty sure if some kid is retrieving a ball from your lawn, you can't get away with gunning them down.
@The Great Pumpkin No there is definitely other features to it, you have to be put in danger or feel your life is being threatened. so no obv you can’t kill the kid getting his ball but if he pulls out a strap he gettin smoked
@ethan TBF, your previous comment read: "if someone’s on your property in most states you’re allowed to shoot them." But you can't (or at least shouldn't legally be able to) shoot someone for just being on your property. And I was responding to that. But yes, there's more to it than just that. However, I think it could lead to a lot of gray area or slippery slopes. For example, there's a case where a drunk woman steals a literal Nazi flag from a Nazi's trailer, and he shoots at her multiple times and by some miracle doesn't kill her. People are actually justifying his reaction, tho.
@Spliffed to The Gallows If we use history as a barometer then property is far more valuable than life. It doesn't mean it's a great lesson in morality, but it's true that most wars cost lives, and are fought over resources (property.) As proof I would argue that battles are named for real estate, for example it's "the Somme." History forgets the name of even a single one of the 1M combatants who died.
@Rodney Smith nah they were stopped and murdered for going 1 mph over the speed limit. They didn't do anything wrong, cops just let the rounds fly as soon as he stopped.
Absolutely right. I might even take it a step further and say it's not even worth it to protect your property. In my area recently there was a guy who saw some thieves taking the catalytic converter off of his car. He approached them with his firearm telling them to stop, but they were armed as well and then a gunfight took place. Guy was killed over a catalytic converter, not worth it if you ask me. I'll only result to violence to protect myself or others, property can be replaced
@BambooScar well you need to wake up and actually read the facts of the case before spouting off. You're not better than the cult of the woke members if not.
This is an important statement. I watched recently a man shoot his girlfriends ex husband over her not letting the father see his kids. It was a argument in front of a house and the BF felt a gun was necessary even tho the father was unarmed and he shot the father bc the father approached him to, likely disarm him but he killed him and was never charged due to self defense. Had they just called the cops those kids would still have a dad and not a murderer for a step dad.
Yeah, not like the dude pulled up his shorts the minute he exited the store, preparing himself for physical conflict. He pushed the guy, whatever happens next is on him. It's one thing arguing with another person, but if you physically assault someone and end up shot, thats your problem lmao.
@Carinae Psychotic worldview. Attemptying to justify somebody using lethal force against a person who is backing away is just next level. I'll add the lmao as well, just to make myself seem cooler. lmao.
@CEREAL KILLER But it doesn’t work that way..if you are justified in drawing your gun that means you are in fear of your life because that is the ONLY reason to draw your gun.
Exactly, never pull your weapon, unless you intend to use it. And you better be right. This guy was looking for an excuse to use his weapon. A real jerk.
I personally don't love guns and don't plan on ever owning one, but I love it when gun owners are responsible and understand what it means to carry a firearm
@Ethan CR This comment needs to be higher up! So many people are calling him completely justified in the situation, not realizing that he is telling his story in a way that isn't entirely honest.
@keegan johnson Long stories are usually full of embellishments. Sorry for your loss, but sounds like it's a bit of a trend in your family. Much more likely that you've got a shitty family than for 3 separate mistakes to be made to the same family. That's just basic statistics. I've had many encounters with police, survived them all just fine.
@jacksobrooks would you make the same statement about the blatant extortion and abuse of civilians rights that occur on a daily basis! I guarantee you it’s way over half who conduct business in this manner! Furthermore the other ones don’t say anything for a band of brothers mentality and which has plagued many ugly instances in our armed forces and police brutality! The system is very broken and almost designed for cops and civilians to not get a long. I have seen some good cops so let’s be clear but the bad far outweigh the good! If it wasn’t for peoples story’s on here that show how their rights were abused then I wouldn’t of learned. Saying you just don’t think its not happening is not listening to people who have gone through it. We can tell our stories but until people choose to believe it to fit their narrative because they don’t wanna believe it.
@jacksobrooks one thing I will agree with is people do act like it’s worse now more then ever and that’s cuz of body cams and we can see with our own two eyes and it enrages the people who have went through it. Makes them relive the bad moments we had with cops. It’s not worse but it’s being filmed is all. Now everyone can see!
The other guy instigated the fight. Legally, Drejka was in the wrong. Morally, I give him a pass. Don’t assault people. Dumbass thought he could attack someone without consequences. Stupid games, stupid prizes.
if you've seen the CCTV and have heard testimony of McGlockton's girlfriend (Jacobs), this is a more complex case than you make it out to be. It's true that Drejka is an idiot, wanna-be cop who murdered someone in the second degree as they were retreating from him. But it's also true that you are still allowed to initiate a disagreement with someone regardless of whether you're carrying. Such a verbal confrontation in and of itself is not a crime. You are not permitted to attack someone who is arguing with your girlfriend, even if it's over something petty or you feel he's in the wrong. Jacobs never testified that Drejka physically threatened her or acted in any way that would make a reasonable person feel as though her life or that of another was in danger. Additionally, she was in the driver seat of a vehicle, with the key, and she even opened her door and exited beside Drejka as McGlockton approached from the side. These aren't actions a person who fears for her life and the lives of her kids takes. On the contrary, it was she who threatened earlier to "get her man", which although not constituting all that imminent a threat by itself, clearly and reasonably can be thought of as a threat of harm in some regard. Both men made poor choices. And when you say "pulling a gun out is your last resort in the face of a threat to you", I agree. I would consider being tackled to the ground one of those instances. Firing upon someone who then retreats is of course another thing entirely.
Great system. Now, as long as everyone is disciplined and mature then the “everyone has a gun” world works. Sadly that isn’t reality, so you’ll have never ending tragedy, forever.
Having a conversation in a parking lot is NOT "instigating" nor is it illegal. Getting pushed off your feet is definitely illegal and justified Drejka's heroic act. Bet them thugs in that neighborhood thinkin' twice before layin hands.
@Spliffed to The Gallows a humans rights are also important. The right to own and protect property. I don't care about your pathetic life if your trying to break in my house. I don't care if your homeless. I don't care if your starving. If you break in, I'm feeding you lead.
@Dangerous Dru it's almost like people think that it's not the criminals fault that they break into your house. Like they can't control it, you won't get shot if you stay out of my stuff! Easy, I avoid getting shot by doing this everyday. Here, a little guide, step 1) notice other persons stuff, step 2) leave other persons stuff alone, step 3) no shooting occurs. Look how nice I am, I didn't even ask for money for that! Also, the guy saying that 3 family members just so happened to get killed by cops while totally, no seriously, take my word for it, were not doing anything illegal, I am above and beyond skeptical that they weren't doing quite a lot wrong.
@Spades 75 yes dude a hundred percent! Then people ask what they did and all he says is "long story." If they were shot for no reason that's a pretty short story lmao.
@Dangerous Dru I was a Paralegal for eight years. I've heard a lot of "long stories". Usually it's people breaking the law and honestly just getting upset that they were held to task. There are bad cops out there, sure, same as there are bad plumbers and bad office workers, but it's hardly the majority.
So, handicap spot or not, does anybody else think that a random man pulling up and immediately circling around a woman in her car with her kids might come across as a little creepy?
It doesn't matter if it comes to you as creepy. He was indeed looking for a plate, which is something normal if you are concerned about people missusing the handicap spot.
@Publio Virgilio The handicapped spot was not legal. The town did not approve of it. Drejka was parked illegally and shot another man because he thought he had a right. It was not normal for any rational human being.
@Looking 4 Things it also doesn't matter if the spot was legal or not, the thing is that the family parked in that spot, they wouldn't know it wasn't legal, they did wrong. The black man was stupid for pushing someone from a blindspot, and of course the shooter did absolutely wrong for shooting him to death, but it is true that he could have feared for his life. There is no need to divide people in good and bad, they were all wrong.
@Publio Virgilio Yes it does, at least if you have some sense of self-preservation when confronting strangers and managing the sort of reaction you elicit from them. Or at least understand the responsibility that you have as a gun owner to avoid escalating to lethal force.
He could also have spoken to a store clerk or called the police.
@Publio Virgilio It very much does matter how Drejka's actions were interpreted, which is why several witnesses were called at trial to testify as to what they saw and heard between Drejka and Marquis' wife, and they all said he was loud and threatening. They even made mention of the confrontation when they went into the store to the owner which alerted Marquis as to what was happening.
@Porky I'm not saying that drejka did right, he is a murderer and he payed for his crime. But that fact doesn't delete the bad decisions the family made. They didn't care about an eventual handicapped persona and the man chose instant violence instead of speaking or calling the police like you said.
@Herbert West I'm split a little in this case. Both men made very bad choices. Drejka should have at most tapped on her window and said it's a restricted spot, chose more productive words for a reminder that its selfish behavior exploiting the handicaps of others. Perhaps tell the clerk about it if she's nasty in response or refuses to move. McGlockton should have de-escalated the situation and refrained from brazenly assaulting someone over a verbal argument. Drejka never made any specific threats of harm-- yes, he acted aggressively and inappropriately, and he's an idiot wanna-be cop. But why would a woman who felt like her life and kid's lives were potentially in danger, when she's the driver of the vehicle she's sitting in, open her door and get out beside Drejka? I never heard any evidence that he spoke words or took action that constituted an immediate threat to her or anyone else. I've had crazies and assholes approach me in public and get my heart racing, and guess what? Regardless or whether or not I'm armed, I de-escalate with words or leave the area if it only gets worse. I feel that by unconditionally supporting McGlockton because of Drejka's mistakes, you send those who listen and agree with you a message that it's ok to attack people in public if they're arguing with you or a loved one, and that the best course of action is to escalate situations like this. It's toxic behavior that gets people seriously hurt and killed. And even if the other party was in the wrong, does it matter when you're dead? Black leaders especially need to be sending this message to their communities, but instead seem to send the opposite: that you can do to people whatever you want if they start an argument with you. That culture of taking these situations into your own hands is causing generational trauma, harm, increasing violence and death. But I suppose we'll keep pointing the finger elsewhere...
@Publio Virgilio In my opinion there were much better ways to handle that concern than him encircling the car and escalating things himself from there. I think that at a certain point things should've been left to actual law enforcement, not some random guy wanting to play cop. At least if it's actual law enforcement inspecting my car and getting awfully close to my kids, I'd know what the intentions are.
I think that this guy wanted to take out some of his frustrations on his own by initiating this conflict. Maybe he didn't go in with the intent to kill, but he certainly had the intent to start an altercation of some kind.
End of the day, what a petty reason for anyone to die. A parking space.
In fairness i do let people know about their bad driving or parking but i keep my distance and typically start with do you need medical assistance? Then why the F are you driving/ parking like that. That being said i try very hard to not approach someone in a car as i know when folks rush my window i have pepper spray and other ready to engage the conflict.
It’s not any less creepy than a random woman pulling up and immediately circling around a man in his car with his kids. Stop creep exaggerating. The kids weren’t even in the car with her, they went into the store with the father.
@Aaron King Timestamps for any of these claims? Also do you even know what the word "prude" means? Why do you sound so fatherless and mad Aaron? Got some problems irl? Got something you wanna share with us?
@Looking 4 Things its about respecting and acknowledging that there are other drivers on the road. Theres no reason anyones driving should effect anyone elses journey if we all did what we were supposed to do. Thank god my grandmother doesnt drive but she can barely walk and the distance in that video would have taken her 30 mins to do on her own and thats with a good spot.
@Looking 4 Things lol i dont care about others but also dont want to get ripped out of my ride and beat to death. This does happen every day and im not just talking about hurt feelings.
It was ridiculous for him to even say he was hurt and insane for him to act like he did after having literally just having shot someone in the chest with a gun!!
If I had my kids and wife in the car, and some creep started walking around staring at my car I would be on full alarm too. The dad walking out not knowing what was going on, I’m sure he was also on full alarm. All of this is due to this guys ego, and his over inflated sense of justice.
Drejka didn't confront the woman calmly either. Several people that pulled up to the store and got out of their cars as the confrontation was happening actually made comments to the store owner and Marquis about how loud and aggressive Drejka was. They testified to this at the trial. It was a very heated exchange. Marquis was defending his family like any man would do.
Also they mentioned Dreka had a history of pulling out a weapon on 4 unarmed people (2 men, 2 women) in the past. His firearm should’ve been stripped from him a long time ago
@Herbert West I really don't think just shoving a man like that is good or defending your family. Maybe if he was actually threatening or it seemed like he was already about to get in, then yeah. If what the father did was shitty, then what Drejka did was pure evil. Again, shoving a man like that is a shitty move, unless the man was punching the car already, and I'm not justifying what Drejka did at all.
@Sittie Nakan if some guy is harassing a man's family I think a push would not be a over reaction with how stuff like this usually plays out a fight would breakout I feel as if we as Americans have belief of our right to fuck people up or just kill them for minors things which i why situations like this are so common here all the guns floating around just makes things that would usually end in a beating more deadly then they would in other countries just reading some of the comments here believing this man desreved to die over a push just soldifys my belief
Oh hes at it... for 1 dollar a month you can have over 30 JCS videos you haven't seen that are usually an hour long and involve way more disturbing content ;) SERIOUSLY worth it for a measly $1 a month...
@Anti - Ethnic Cleansing It is because I'm supporting my favourite youtuber who's content has flourished on Patreon due to our support. Don't hate, Be happy.
lol no doubt. And that's just $1,800 something if everyone pledged a dollar. Not taking into account all the ten dollar pledgers. And yeah, I think Jim puts everything together, then has Kizzume do the reading.
At this point they need to create their own independent website were you can subscribe for their content. I will not give any money to patreon and would enjoy watching more of their content than what they offer on youtube. Also, what's with the pizza slice and the name latenight lowlife? A lot of people know what pizza means these days. Hopefully you're not involved in that or you will get what's coming to you.
And for good reason. I can't stand most other channels in general and their failed cringe attempts at comedy every other sentence. It's like they r so excited narrating that they think they can become comedians or something. 🙄
Imagine a cop tells you that somebody has died because of you, and your response is "thank you for telling me that" instead of "im so sorry to hear that". Really shows how egocentric he is
I think most reasonable people would have lost their mind if they found out they killed a man over an unused parking spot in front of his The level of grief would be too much to bare to continue with the interview.
People freak out about handicapped parking. I lost a leg several years ago and often wear a prosthetic. Now and then I will use handicapped parking and even with the Florida tag endorsement I've been verbally attacked for parking in a spot designated for me to park at because I don't look handicapped enough. Folks need to learn to let police handle police matters.
So sad that he cried over missing his dogs, but he had no reaction when he was told that he took the life of another human being. Lord, what kind of world has this become?
not just took a life but took a father away from his kids. I've seen some terrible things on this channel. obviously the guy that killed his family and the Casey Anthony case. but this one is infuriating for a whole other reason that being I cant believe how stupid it is. he killed someone over a parking spot. this is so bad I'm actually going to spell it out instead of using the the acronym: SHAKING MY DAMN HEAD
@Muskoka Mike He killed someone after getting shoved. I got fucking sucker punched in the gut in highschool, I dont think I had the RIGHT to shoot the guy, and I still dont think so to this day.
@Muskoka Mike so did u not watch the video and pay attention? he went to jail because the evidence was clear that he did not need to take someones life. at MOST all he needed to do was pull out his gun and scare the other guy off.
@sam grant I did watch the video and many people are arrested who haven't committed a crime. He was convicted due to his mindset of almost going out to look for something like this to happen.
In many other places, he wouldn't even be arrested in the first place. "stand your ground" laws and all.
If you think a person isn't supposed to defend themselves when attacked, you should come up to Canada. Here if someone is breaking into our house and we stop them we get arrested too. If someone attacks us on the street and we defend ourselves, the same: we get arrested.
The point you all are missing is: you don't turn a verbal argument into a physical one because you never know if the other person is going to pull out a gun and defend themselves.
@Muskoka Mike He did have the right to defend himself, but if he chose to respond with deadly force then there would be a burden of proof he must meet that he genuinely felt his life was in danger.
There was no chance he was going to ask to talk to a lawyer. This guy saw himself a cop basically, he was very happy to talk to the police and tell them what a good job he did. He probably thought they'd all take him out for a beer afterwards, and tell him that he could be fully in charge of that store parking lot from now on.
@Diamond Cooper I agree with active self protection. but in fairness he initiated the entire thing. if I go around starting shit with people and kill them as the become aggressive is that ok?
He did wrong by shooting him and especially shooting him in the body, but the other dude started being aggressive first. One thing is having a verbal argument, and the other one is using force.
@Fox Right. Like you wouldn't confront a man being aggressive with your woman. The shooter was being aggressive first with the victim's woman, so much so that people in the store could hear the altercation.
@William Graham has it been said that it was him who started being aggressive or you're just making this up? All I've heard that there were 2 people arguing. And anyway, he didn't touch her once, but her man comes out and starts being a macho by pushing him on the ground. Not that simple.
@Fox Dude, did you watch the video? Fact: He lied about his interactions with the victim. Fact: He has a history of pulling his gun on people. Four people to be exact including women. Fact: He walked around the car and rightfully the woman rolled down her window to ask him what he was doing. He approached her car when he had no right to do so. He went there with a confrontation in mind. That in itself is aggressive. Are we supposed to believe that a man who goes around pulling his gun on people was not aggressive 🙄
@William Graham You don't know what he was thinking when he pulled the gun out on this dude. You don't know what happened when he pulled his gun out before. He had full rights to approach someone's car, he didn't come that close nor did he touch it. He went there to tell her to park her car on the other spot, we still don't know who started the confrontation first. Even if he was aggressive, he didn't use any force first. All the people close to him say he was always calm and no one even knew he had a gun in the first place. I don't know what you see, but I surely don't see a psycho who wants to kill someone. Just a basic man who has a gun for self defense.
@Fox You dont need to write all that. Just think to yourself for a moment: Should I kill a guy because he took a step towards me? Did i really think he was about to kill me or was I just overreacting? I think overreacting. Case closed.
William Graham2021-06-26 05:39:25 (edited 2021-06-26 05:40:10 )
@cj Hall Be that as it may, what is wrong with it is knowing the encounter could end up in an aggressive confrontation and you being ok with that because you know you're packing. He confronted the driver with the knowledge that if things didn't go the way he wanted he could simply pull out his gun and shut them up. As he had done four times previously. It's clear it was only a matter of time before he killed someone.
And you have no right to confront anyone about parking in a handicap section unless you're in law enforcement.
@Violet Wade He threw him on the ground. Maybe he was overreacting, but everyone in the comments says that he's that pure evil who just wants to kill people, or that he's weak and wants to pour his anger on even weaker ones, and I think that's not the case. I don't see that amount of hate on videos of real murderers.
@Fox See that's where you lost everyone. You dont shoot someone because they made you mad. Period. The fact that he shot a man shows that he's 1) Not fit to carry a weapon, 2) Not good at deescalating a situation, 3) YES overreacting. If he really thought the dude was going to kill him, then he was blowing the whole thing outta proportion. He had SO MANY OTHER OPTIONS to avoid further commotion. But he chose to pull out a gun and kill him. That makes you a murderer if you cant find any other way out of a pretty innocuous situation but to shoot and kill. This should be simpler than youre making it. Maybe u just want to justify the shooting cuz youre scared it'll become a racial thing? Whatever it is, stop over thinking it. The shooter belongs in an institution.
@William Graham to say someone has to right to approach someones car is asinine and stupid. Solely because of that i think your argument is crap. Dude shouldnt be harassing people over handicap placards and he was a shit pile...but sneaking up on someone and shoving them to the ground like that would put some fear in you...he shouldn't have shot. If he was really in fear flashing it could've been enough but you are right...he wanted to kill him.
Thing is these things do nothing but divide and make everyone hate each other. There is no way forward because that hatred is important to some.
@Fox they both did wrong, but one did significantly more wrong than the other. What next? Are you going to say jay walkers are just as bad as drunk drivers? Do you have no sense of scale?
@Violet Wade how can you state blatantly false information to make ones case look better? Saying the guy only took a step towards the shooter is just false. He violently pushed him down. They're not saying shooting him was the right call. They're just saying your argument is dogshit, and it is.
@Violet Wade Exactly what I'm talking about. You don't take anything into the consideration. You see that someone shot someone and are fully convinced that he's a criminal or even a psycho, and the fact that he wasn't the one to start this is non-existent.
@Frogstarr How come you don't work as a police officer yet if you can figure out what was everyone saying from a low quality video without sound showing only one person's back?
@Zach Johnson Telling someone not to park on a handicap place is being a shit person? He wanted to kill someone so much that he initiated an argument just to justify himself after, even though he was characterized as a calm person? I don't even want to continue this discussion.
@William Graham sticks and stones... but still that guy didn't continue being physically aggressive, so he was not in imminent danger. At that point if he would have called the cops he would have been in the right. Most likely would have even gotten compensation, if he sued the man.
@Fox You keep harping on this crazy lunatic being a calm person. What are you basing this on? The guy has a history of pulling guns on people, even women, but yet here you are claiming insistently that he's a calm level headed person who's just misunderstood?
@Timberland People carry guns for all sorts of reasons. The predominant one being for protection. Some I believe carry guns because they relish the idea of having power or intimidating anyone who gets in their way or doesn't immediately do as they please.
@Fox I find your defence of this murderer very strange.
This murderer lied and tried to claim that the victim took a step towards him and so he fired his gun in fear for his life. The video evidence proves otherwise.
The clown then sat and blabbered to the investigators who he thought were his friends and would side with his brand of justice. They were able to get a true account of what happened out of his own clown mouth.
He deliberately approached that car knowing it might end in a confrontation. He didn't care because he had a gun on him, which he planned to use to solve any confrontation that might crop up. That's what gave him confidence as it had in the past.
In fact he didn't pull the trigger because he feared for his life, but because he feared a beating. He feared that he was going to be kicked and beaten, so he pulled out his gun and killed another human being.
And despite your repeated claims that he was calm during the initial confrontation, there was enough of an argument that people in the store heard and the woman's husband came out. Also a calm person would not have a history of pulling a gun on different people on multiple occasions.
A calm person would not have shot and murdered another person in this situation.
And finally the court judged him to be a murderer. End of story. Case closed
@William Graham you don't know what was he thinking at the moment. You don't know what was going on in his head afterwards. You don't know with what intent he approached the car. You don't know he "planned to use a gun". I don't know what a saint are you if you won't use a gun even when you're being beaten. What's the point of having one then? Also, I never said that he was calm during the confrontation. I said that people who know him said he was generally a calm person. I don't know who started screaming and won't pretend that I know everything like you do. And as I said, you don't know what situation he pulled the gun out in. Ant the last part is just exactly my point: you accuse him of being a psycho-murderer with pure evil flowing through his veins just because the court said he did it intentionally. Same court released a person who murdered her own child, would you defend her then? I'm so tired of this argument.
@Fox What are you on about? We do know what happened when he pulled out his gun. We saw the video. The victim AND another were turning away from him, not taking a step toward him when he fired his gun.
@Fox Um...I do know what he was thinking before and after. The guy told the investigators. Are you saying he was lying or did you simply skip the parts in the video where he said he feared a kick and beating?
Actually no, I don't need to pull out a gun to feel big and strong. I don't own a gun and even if I did I would not be pulling and pointing it at people, because I feared being beaten up.
People might know him as calm, but his record says otherwise. He's pulled his gun on multiple people including women. A calm person would not do that. You can justify one incident of pulling a gun on someone, but 5 times? Where the fifth time ended with murdering another human being?
I'm seriously starting to wonder if you really watched the video. I'm not saying he's a psycho-murderer simply because the court said so. I watched him murder a person, try to cover it up by lying and the investigators got the truth out of him.
@cj Hall confronting someone over handicap parking is stupid unless that person is intentionally preventing you from parking there when you have a legitimate need. Even then, you don’t know that they’re not allowed to park there. Maybe you can’t see the placard or the disability. My placard fell off the mirror a few times and I was ticketed, and I had to go and deal with enforcement and show I had the legal right to be there. You could watch me walk from the vehicle to the building and not realize I have a legit disability, but I do. I don’t think that’s the case here but none of this is anyone’s business unless they’re parking enforcement officers (or whatever that role is) or they are harassing a person with a disability. If Drejka or you or anyone else came up and acted like this I might tell you to F off because I don’t have to answer your questions. Or I might lol and say the placard falls down but it’s current, enjoy your day. Depends on my mood and the way I’m approached. But you don’t know someone is a shit person based on what you can’t see, and that’s what is wrong with just getting up in someone’s face over a handicap parking spot.
@Sarah Nikas the only thing that is very clear is that he was attempting to enforce a law and in doing so he created a situation that resulted in a death.
@Fox reading on, I’m glad everyone else seems to see sense here. You are clearly trying to justify this man’s actions (and trying weirdly hard to do so) for whatever reason. Thank god the rest of us aren’t as fucking stupid
@Zach Johnson 1st the issue with your argument is the man is not a police officer nor an employee of said store . He has no right to approach a vehicle for any reasons other than to see if the driver is in need of assistance. 2nd he had 4 cases of pulling his weapon out on people . 3rd if you walk out the store and see some random man yelling and cussing your significant other around your children , any man would immediately go into offense . He was the aggressor, and now he's in jail getting a train ran on him 🤷
@Fox I have a question. Beyond the "objective lens" or devil's advocate approach, what is your personal opinion on the matter? Obviously he killed someone which we all agree was horrible but your stance seems to be that unlike what the video stages, the man was a mostly normal citizen that was thrust into a situation in which he made a bad call. Do you mind exploring how you feel about it? I'm not here to ridicule or point fingers
@Noah Martinez I feel bad about any form of violence and in this situation it seemed to me like a victim was an initiator of violence. I think every conflict can be dealt with with words and people who can't do that are responsible for their actions, and this includes death. I can't imagine pushing someone when there's no threat, but I can totally imagine getting pushed or kicked because someone is just getting agressive towards me, so it's easier for me to understand what might have been happening in the mind of the attacker then what was happening in the mind of an initiator. Once again, I might be wrong, which I already said a couple of times. But I feel like given the story I heard in the video, I might also not be, but nobody wants to acknowledge this. Is that what you wanted to know?
@Fox Yup that's all I wanted, thank you for allowing me to see your point and sorry for everyone piling on you. Especially in cases like this it's easy to become blindsided by rage at the occurrence and hard to see someone else's perspective. There's a lot of truth to your words from my own perspective and these details are important. Have a good day
@Noah Martinez thank you for a good conversation. Sometimes it almost seems like people can only yell at each other and nice people get lost from the view. Sorry if it seemed that I was justifying killing someone, most of the time misunderstanding is the main problem in the argument.
@Fox Of course, and it's even worse when everyone dog piles without even reading the whole thread. Between 10-15 people just disregarded everything you said and questioned your pursuit for logic and frankly it was irritating. In a perfect world we wouldn't all be trying to cede power from one another and instead seek to understand and uplift one another but until then all we can do is try.
@Fox it was the right thing to be aggressive because his daughter and partner were in the car and a random dude is shouting at them! Natural instinct to protect your family
@Jayda J I don't think instincts apply to civil people. The instinct to rape someone is natural, too, but rape is bad and no one supports it, so no one should support aggression either.
@tmas the thing is, I didn't find it logical. By the time I already explained my position, and it was either ignored or not understood by the commenter. I'm over this argument, I explained myself, do what you want with this.
@tmas if you did read it whole, then you didn't really read into it. I thought my position was crystal clear, especially after my last conversation. I only stated that given his record, lack of information and the fact that he was attacked first, it's irresponsible to draw a conclusion that he is a cold-blooded murderer. I know it's easy to do so, but I literally said "it's not that simple" and people were triggered that I could even question their verdicts that were based on one video. They call me a defender of a murderer, even though my first comment read "what he did was wrong". That about sums it up, please, don't ask me anymore questions I already answered.
crazy how his arm worked perfectly fine when he was alone, but as soon as the cops walk in it’s “owiee my poor arm i can’t even lift it 🥺🥺 shake my left hand instead 🥺🥺” absolutely pathetic
Conclusion: On December 14, 2018, Judge Joseph Bulone set the trial of Michael Drejka to begin on August 19, 2019. Drejka was no longer using a "Stand Your Ground" defense. On August 23, Drejka was found guilty of manslaughter with the use of a firearm. On October 10, 2019, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit of 92 days for time served (he had faced up to 30 years in prison). McGlockton's family asked for the maximum, while the defense asked for house arrest and probation. The judge spared Drejka from the maximum sentence due to his cooperation with the police and his lack of prior convictions, but said that he was a wannabe cop and tough guy who tried to self-appoint himself as a handicapped parking space monitor.
He is imprisoned at Lancaster Correctional Institution, near Trenton, Florida, where he was attacked and reportedly wounded by another inmate on February 11, 2020. In December 2021, a three-judge panel of the Florida Second District Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and the sentencing.
@Metal Gamer Yes yes, I'm sure she's given careful consideration to all handicapped before parking in their spaces, weighing each scenario carefully before finalizing the park...........
@Johnny Natrium have you honestly ever seen a handicap person get out of a car and go “gosh I’m sure glad that this handicap parking spot was open, if it wasn’t, who knows where I’d be”. There’s a reason he was convicted of manslaughter.
@Zach Vinson Yes. Too often I have seen truly handicapped people struggle when a non-stickered car parks in a handicapped stall. That man was wrong and deserves to be punished for what he did. But people who wrongly park in handicapped stalls are scum.
@Red Diver I’m not referring to places like grocery stores or something. When you’re referring to something a little bigger, I totally get it. Biggest douche move in the world. I totally agree. There was a video I seen of a guy who couldn’t get his wheelchair ramp out because a lady parked in the middle of the lines on a spot. So I totally see what you mean. But because someone parked in one at a rundown gas station that was “his store” he felt he needed to do something about it. Which got someone killed. That’s what I meant when I’m referring to the handicap spot. If it’s Walmart or something, I totally get it. But a 10 second stop at a rundown gas station isn’t the same. I feel like context matters in these situations.
@Zach Vinson We are VERY grateful for those spots, and we SAY SO too. I guess you're a teenager and yet to develop to the adult stage, why else would you make such an inane comment!? Hmm, he shot an unarmed man, perhaps that's why he was convicted of manslaughter. Just a guess, of course.
@Johnny Natrium are you really suggesting that it was her fault her husband was shot and killed in front of their young children no less, because she parked in a disabled spot which was the furthest from the door and every single spot in front of the door was actually available. We don’t even get to see the actual spot!! It could be one that has no post and barely visible paint on the ground! I happen to live 20 mins from where this happened and I can tell you 100% that we have MANY spots where it’s not immediately obvious if your not specifically looking! But yea your probably right… it’s all her fault.
@Melissa Coulter How about you read my comment again; the answer to your question is right there. Do I really have to remind you that you completely made up your entire accusation upon which you base your gripe with me? Look at your first sentence, which is a question based upon sheer fantastical speculation about what I might be thinking, and then look at my comment to see that you never needed to ask that question.
So now people should be mindful of not parking in certain spots so they don't get shot based on most arguments I've read that's the assessment I've come to make.
@Metal Gamer that's pretty weird that you think handicapped spaces should be given to non-handicapped people when there are other spaces available. that's almost like the exact opposite of how that should work
@Squiggly Line i am telling you this as a full time wheelchair user, it doesn't fucking matter. Her boyfriend was slaughtered in front of her over a miniscule misstep. She has no blame here, this man would have killed anyone who became slightly aggressive with his self-appointed entitlement to authority. Mistakes do not mean someone should die.
@Johnny Natrium The parking space was not a legal handicapped space with the proper signage approved by the town. As the deputy on the scene explained. Drejka was illegally parked.
@Looking 4 Things Who said it makes sense to me? If I may humbly offer some advice: stop stressing yourself out by filling in other people's thoughts and views with negativity, based on some preconditioned assumption that people who say one person was in the wrong, automatically think the other person was right in doing what they did. This shapes such a common misguided worldview where people are reduced to one-dimensional evil or good, based on simplistic and generalizing interpretations of opinions.
@Johnny NatriumAfter noticing your many condescending statements in this feed. Ive seen how you respond to others.-- You see in others what you cannot admit is in yourself.( Hint, nobody cares that much to attack you in any way.)
@Squiggly Line still it doesn't justify being killed by police wannabe person
0 likes
Marta Hardt2022-05-20 17:05:21 (edited 2022-05-20 23:31:21 )
You'd almost think he caught his wife cheating on him in a car parked in a handicapped spot, or saw his father get killed by somebody who was parked in one with how OBSESSED his is with those handicapped spots and the inappropriate amount of rage he has for people who park in one without the placard. Chill dude. That's not exactly the most pressing issue in our society today.
Your right in this case, many parking spots next to it available. If it was a full parking lot I could understand his pount of view to check.. (I have also the habbit to check for the card when I walk by a car parked in a handicap spot. And when I see non and someone sitting in the car they also get my dirty look pointed at them.. even I'm not a handicapted man)
The whole vibe I got from this guy was a denied soldier, an unfit cop, couldn’t even land a job as a security guard. I feel like this guy has been waiting his entire life for an opportunity to be a hero in some fantasy he conjured up. The way he spoke to these police officers made me feel that way.
You're right. That's why you don't physically assault people, because you might assault the wrong armed hothead.
394 likes
Ben Kaplan2020-10-16 05:53:09 (edited 2020-10-16 05:54:45 )
Yep..exactly..its kind of pathetic but when I was 21 I was hired as security to look for bombs in the Marriott hotel in times square new York City after a 12 hour class (which was 2 that tbe instructor gave us tbe answer for ..and I was on opiates) . ..he obviously had problems that other people saw in him .. BUT he was a neighborhood watchmen which is very prestigious ...
Lee Ham it’s true. I feel really sad for both men, especially Markeis. He made a decision to honor his family with considerable aggression, and moments later he lost his one and only life. That’s it. He was cast into the eternal mystery. All because Michael Drejka wanted to be somebody, and never was.
I got the same vibe, he was so ready to defend himself on the self-defense grounds and he seemed to be the classical gun owner, dont tread on my lands, i vote trump type
@Christer Knutsen lmao that guys not your classical gun owner I’ve been around guns my whole life and have never met anyone or known of anyone in my family who went to prison for shooting someone. If anything my dads old pilot instructor went to prison for trying to kill his gf or some shit with a crossbow.
@Lee Ham black guy was defending his lady who was being verbally assaulted by a strange hothead white dude. He shouldn't have shoved him, no, but it was at least understandable as he was probably scared for his woman.
@Abby Cross I believe they do. What evidence do you have to support this? If a criminal attempts to harm someone, a law-abiding citizen can use a gun to fend off the attacker. This happens often. The FBI statistics say it happen at least 500 000 times a year, or up to 3 000 000 times a year. It's pretty obvious that a tool designed for harm can be used to harm deviant individuals.
@Abby Cross Scared for his woman that an old man is scolding her? So scared of him that he has to assault him and throw him to the ground? Say what you will about grandpa's character and his shitty personality, but god damn assaulting someone like that especially when they're not violent or directly threatening is just stupid. Neither of these men made particularly good choices
@killsalot78 grandpa? He looks pretty middle-aged to me. And she wasnt getting a tsk-tsk finger-wagging from him, he was yelling at her. No, he shouldn't have shoved him. But the guy you think is ancient (???) shouldn't have shot a retreating man.
I agree, especially the way he was trying to police the handicapped parking spots. No normal person would even care about something so minor but I could see someone who wanted and failed to be a civil servant their whole life doing stupid stuff like this to feel important.
Got the same vibe, guy is the complete opposite of a responsible gun owner. Someone looking for confrontation because he can hide under the saftey of having a firearm with him. I feel like had the victim not shoved him he probably wouldn't have shot him but the clown clearly has never been in a fight at all and being scared he chose to murder someone else because of his own insecurities. Sad little man that Mr. Drekja
@Lee Ham You have to judge the situation as you would react in the moment. If all I saw was a random guy yelling at my wife and being aggressive, my first impulse would be to defend her in this case. I don’t think I would have attacked him, but that still would be a reasonable thing to do.
@Lee Ham but we don’t know what this guy said to the wife to cause the aggression by the father. Is it not possible this guy threatened the wife? This guy is clearly unstable and has an aggressive history. Just another perspective to consider. Either way, we can’t have people shooting people like this.
@Priscilla I already gave evidence, Priscilla. The FBI statistics show that roughly 500 000 - 3 000 000 crimes are stopped by guns each year in the USA. From that data, we can assume that a portion of those crimes are life-threatening, and proves that guns save lives.
4 likes
Lee Ham2020-12-02 21:24:37 (edited 2020-12-02 21:25:05 )
@Anavader Duo That is an excellent point, and one I did not not consider. At this point, I'll just have to accept that there is more gray area here than I originally thought. If he was threatening his wife, then I think it's justifiable; the black man would not be at fault.
I still stand by my thoughts of "don't mess with crazy" however. Being crazy isn't against the law, so there are crazies just waiting to do something like this. Be careful out there, people. You don't know until you have experience with someone like that, so try not to make your first experience with crazy your last .
@Anavader Duo the victim came out and saw an aggressive male arguing with his gf with his kids in the car. Im not surprised that he shoved this guy away. There are lots of incidences caused by cowards like the guy in this video who, after being confronted for trying to intimidate a woman, pulls a gun when faced with another male. He threatened another woman with kids before. Pathetic.
@Lee Ham gun self defense statistics are widely regarded as exaggerated, same as any self reported number. these “criminals” they defend against are almost never caught and almost never go to the hospital afterward so there aren’t medical records to support it. the amount of people who’ve said they’ve used a gun for self defense is about the same as as many americans said yes when asked if they believe in aliens. also 500,000-3,000,000 is one hell of a window, ain’t it?
I think he has a hatred towards black people and that fueled his verbal assault on this woman, I bet if it was a white woman parked like that he wouldn’t blink,
Why don’t you make your argument and leave your least favorite politician out of it? You went from making sense to illogically flawed nonsense in seconds.
Some people here have really strange thoughts when it comes to "be a man". Beeing a man (in a situation like that) means to be in or to establish control. By sucker shoving the dude you only create chaos and that means anything can happen. Its that false perception of "beeing a man" that escalted the situation. Yet people still brag that they would to the same. I dunno what to say about that.
100%. He's a lame wannabe who thinks hes the baddest cop around. For some reason the vibe i got from his interview was that he felt like he was some sort of hero for shooting this guy. Especially when he sounded annoyed when he hard someone screaming about their kids and didnt bother to see if anything else was wrong because he didnt feel threatened (sorry er "neutralized the threat"
Christer Knutsen I get the vibe you are a city-slicker, that you don’t know how to change a tire, that you can’t feed yourself without a grocery store and would vote for Joe Biden 🤣
"This guy has been waiting his entire life for an opportunity to be a hero in some fantasy he conjured up" according to you. This should be applied to the person who pushed. He was the one who showed off and he bit the bullet.
Diamond Cooper there are very clear variables behind the wrong doings of both of these men. One of them is dead. The other seemed satisfied the moment he heard about it. Glad to have policed a parking spot. Glad to have shot a father in front of his three children. Because in his own mind, he was a justified authority. Unfortunately, the dead don’t get to plead their case. But I bet Markeis wouldn’t have sounded anything like Michael.
@Lee Ham - Agreed. The guy that pushed Mike to the ground, would have been charge with assault and done jail time, Mike should have just called the cops and let the law arrest the man that put his hands on someone. Talking in public isn't a crime so at that point they had nothing on the shooter, other than also parking illegally.
Nah man, I know these kind of people. it's a guy who failed his life, is weak and has an inferiority complex, that's why he bothers random people, to take his anger out on them. Feel bad for the victim
The way you felt is why the jury found him guilty. Everyone felt that, even the judge because the judge destroys him verbally during the court proceedings. I think the closing arguments or sentencing.
I understand his anger. Stop parking in handicap spots if you aren’t handicap or have a placard. Nowadays, it’s a big difference. People just walking around with loaded guns may have a mom and gets irritated at the asshole who has parked wrongly. The courts would never select me as a juror. Get these damn guns off of the streets, it’s not okay. People get angry at this type of behavior. Wonder if the police or anyone told these people to park appropriately. Too many angry Americans in this world today. For example, I live in a adult only 1 bedroom apartment building and suffer from really bad headaches, so why is there a family of 4 including two children under 8 living above me. I have called many times and have even gone up the steps myself and remind them that the thumping and banging from the little boy is too much. I am putting my rent in escrow until that family moves. In the meantime, when they thump, I use a plastic baseball bat and bang on the ceiling. If it happens again, I will start banging at 2 and 3 in the morning. Besides I specifically asked before moving in if there were children in the building and I was told no. They lied. I know this doesn’t have much to do with the shooting but people’s actions can sometimes hit a nerve. I understand him. He didn’t need to kill anyone though. Have to be extra careful these days. Nice family above me but wrong place, they have to go where their children can do what children do, but after a year, I am not moving. They don’t belong in this building at all.
@Applecompuser No the assault was the threats that drejka did first, what the woman should of done was called the cops on him and even could of said that he has a gun. If the operator heard kids in the background crying, there's a high probability that they would of rushed. But let's be honest, we are talking about the people of Florida.
@Lee Ham my thoughts EXACTLY. What happened to McGlockton is tragic but was it really necessary for him to so forcefully push a guy he doesn't know because he had 45 second argument with his girlfriend (where she was at fault)?
Just ignore him, get in the car and leave. You NEVER know who you're dealing with.
@earentill best response on this entire video. This is the issue and this will always be an issue as long as owning a gun that can take a life in a matter of seconds is as simple as walking into Wal Mart and having a clean record.
I work with a couple of people who are desperate to be in leader positions but very obviously would make terrible leaders, their vision of leadership is how I imagine this guys vision is .
@alex esposito yeah I'm sure the career criminal was nothing but honorable, between taking a handicapped stall when plenty others are empty to blindsiding someone in the literal video in front of you, he just reeeks of honor
@Trollashnikov Avtomat I’m sure most people can somehow identify with both Michael and Markeis. If I unknowingly walked into this situation as Markeis, I would probably have gotten myself killed also. I like to think that if I was Michael, I would have shown some legitimate restraint and didn’t pull the trigger.
YES! I’m glad someone said it. The way he spoke made me angry since I knew he wasn’t in the military or a cop. And did he just want to do those things so he could finally use a gun? His Defense lawyer also sounded so full of shit. Even without knowing any of the case, I think I would have made the same face as that one lady in the jury. The prosecution team did a great job highlighting the FACTS
@Didificcuideiidfdick could not agree more. So spot on. His life was completely sucked into some falsehood that never actually mattered. This was some kind of act of character for him.
@Bradley harness I think @Christer Knutsen means stereotypical gun owner instead of classical gun owner. If so, then I agree. Where I live, everyone owns guns and people get stabbed more then they do shot.
@Christer Knutsen he literally drives an suv I hope you don’t have kids or if you do they know the difference between a Toyota Tacoma and a Toyota 4 runner
I was also getting that vibe. I feel like he's one of those gun owners who is itching for an excuse to justify carrying. And now he's found himself in a situation where he can trick himself into believing that he has to shoot. Even though it's incredibly clear that this is not the case.
His whole attitude makes him completely unfit to carry. It's perfectly legitimate to carry in the off chance you need to protect yourself or others, but it must be with an attitude of last resort. Of never wanting to ever utilize that EVER.
As I stated, I think he's tricked himself into thinking he's in the fantasy situation he's always wanted to be in, and thus I don't even think he was lying. Possibly the same goes for his "injuries" that he was over-playing. And because of his fantasies, a man, a father, is now dead.
@Lee Ham wow! Thank you for victim blaming That's so cool. Did you not hear the part where he aggressively threatened 4 other people with his gun? That one of those people was a mother with her two children? It seems like this man was looking for someone to hurt. How about we just say don't be this horrible person and leave it at that.
He walked around in our world with hate and depression. It found an outlet. It's sad to imagine what sort of family he grew up with. Those children who are beaten will in turn give beatings, those who are intimidated will be intimidating, those who are humiliated will impose humiliation, and those whose souls are murdered will murder.
Same. The way he says "negative" instead of "no", and uses bullshit words like "force multiplier" just SCREAMS "I idolize the military, but am too unfit to actually serve."
@Bradley harness he is though, just looking for that ideal scenario hes always dreamed of to finally have a legitimate use for his firearm. all gun owners have had that dream. except he got it wrong
@Moritz Dietrich at any time, the moment your Miranda rights are read to you, you can ask for a lawyer, and the interrogation has to stop right then and there.
It’s baffling to me how nobody does. From the moment they walk in they can sit down and refuse to speak until they get a lawyer. That’s the smart thing to do, but thankfully, these people aren’t very smart.
I agree. The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is a perfect example of what lawyering up will do for you. Had Kyle gone thru an interrogation like this one he would have also made statements that would have been used against him at trial. Regardless of anyone opinions of the wrongness or rightness of that case it’s just a fact that police are not trying to cut you slack.
They are trying to get you to say incriminating things and to ask you what happened so that when you make errors they can claim you were being dishonest when most people have trouble relaying accurate details of a stressful situation that can stand up to scrutiny.
The cops would have asked Kyle a bunch of leading questions just like here and the strength of his case would have been weakened because he doesn’t know what a lawyer knows. And if he said the wrong thing it could have buried him.
Whoever convinced him to lawyer up deserves his eternal, lifelong gratitude.
There are plenty of innocent people in prison who wish they had just shut up and refused to answer any questions but it’s human nature to try and explain yourself. To try and justify your actions. And the police use this to their advantage.
@Arctic Terra he’s not standing his ground when there’s clear video of the other person disengaging and walking away. Even if he had said nothing there was still the other man there the entire time that was not with them that witnessed the whole thing. This would never have been a case of stand your ground. The guy shot didn’t tackle him to the ground. He clearly pushed a clear threat away from his family. He pushed him away. He did not walk up and punch him.
@Melissa Coulter My point was less that this was justified (it was absolutely not), and more that a lawyer in a stand your ground state could make an incredibly convincing argument for this as self-defense, since really all you need in those states is “fear for your life”
If he had spoken to a lawyer without this interrogation, this likely could have ended with his lawyer and him crafting a story that he was “shaken up” by the events and his adrenaline was pumping causing him to genuinely fear for his life or something.
You’d be surprised how easy stand your ground laws make it to get away with unjust killings when you have a good lawyer.
He absolutely would have gotten off with a great lawyer and if he kept his mouth shut. Saying that if the guy stood still, he would have no reason to shoot and saying that he couldn't see the guy's face were huge mistakes. If he kept his mouth shut, I guarantee a lawyer would've told him to say that he saw fury and rage in the victim's face and that he truly felt like the man was going to continue attacking him based on the look in his eyes. He could've also said the man verbally threatened him since the CCTV camera didn't pick up audio and the victim's face was looking away from the camera. Our justice system is broken and this guy definitely would've gotten off, or at least a significantly reduced sentence, if he had a good lawyer.
@Moritz Dietrich you can get one immediately and not talk to the cops at all. If the guy had done that and hired a good lawyer there's a very good chance he would have gotten off, or at least a much lighter sentence.
@Moritz Dietrich you can ask for one immediately but they never do. I think the lady cop who committed murder was the fastest one on this channel to request a lawyer. I guess most of these criminals think the detectives are stupid and they can lie their way out of it. it's so funny too watch they are in over their heads. detectives are some of the smartest people on the plsnet its nothing like lying to your mommy about not taking any extra cookies. LOL
@Arctic Terra Belief has to be reasonable §776.012(2) "A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony."
This case is so sad - I can say for a fact, if my man saw another man yelling at me while he was inside of the store he would come out and attempt to protect me like this man did. The fact that he was killed doing so is so tragic.
I'm from the UK so I have no experience with guns, but I imagine 2 things:
Being pushed after causing a scene, doesn't constitute a threatening situation (Unless the man had gotton ontop of him, but as we see here he pushed him and then stepped back to show restraint and willingness to stop this from escalating) I mean maybe when you're 7 years old you think being pushed over is the end of the world, but come on.
And secondly when you pull out the gun, the situation instantly comes to a stop. He ain't going to push the little crazy man over again while a gun is being aimed. Firing the gun is what doesn't make sense.
I live in Boston, MA, and if a cop saw someone with a weapon he'd have a gun to his head, be on the ground, and be handcuffed before he could aim a gun at someone. Up North, this doesn't happen. In the southern states, it does.
tony F actually.... a lot of facilities have limited access. I used to love receiving snail mail from some of the offenders I deal with in my research but they’re all slowly getting eaten up by JPay and states are buying into their email stations and tablet programs. Now I have to buy “virtual stamps” to send messages
Not exactly same degree of seriousness, but I got caught driving WO a full licence. (First snowfall, car slid, then car behind pushed me into parked bus as his car also slid) There were 3 people now involved...me, the other driver, and the car owner who was very close as I almost reached my destination. So, cop asked me to sit in front w him. I was sweating a bit about that, as I was sitting beside his rifle (RCMP) . He asked the two men in back for usual info and describe situation. Then it was my turn. He asked for license, I said I didn't have it. I had none. I was unsure how he'd react. He asked me to describe situation, and he proceeded to compliment me on my handling of the car, said most wouldn't react that way. I forget now what I did lol as it was a Grand Marquis automatic!!! Lol Honestly, he was the nicest cop I ever met! Ended up with a warning and 250.00 fine! But I do agree with rest of the comments here, just sharing a memory I guess! Ty
@Samuel Ortiz were you being interrogated or were they talking tio you after pulling you over. Cause they can be alright and nice on a street stop but if they brought you in for a crime and suspect it's you but dont have enough evidence they go hard on you and try tio verbally beat you into submission hoping to crack you.
@Samuel Ortiz I mean if you are well informed you do, but not everyone is informed they need to immediatley ask for a lawyer and shut your mouth guilty or not.
@Samuel Ortiz Same, even when it wasn't in passing. I even had a cop shave off some of my speed when I was speeding so I wouldn't have extra problems on top of the ticket.
@Oleg de Papa what you absolutely do not do after a shooting like this is sit blabbing with a cop. First thing out of your mouth needs to be "I need medical attention" ....anything at all you say after that a lawyer can say was under duress.
@Oleg de Papa he will certainly keep you out of a 20 year jail sentence. You only ever should use 2 sentences with Cops...1) "I need medical attention" and 2) "I intend to fully cooperate with your investigation officer as soon as I have my lawyer present"
Oleg de Papa ..you don’t, but yes trust me lawyers pretty much do grow on trees these days lol there r more than enough out there and I’m sure many, many competent ones if you may ever need one hopefully not tho.. too many lawyers to even choose from and they all want your business lol so anyways all I’m saying is only a fool would go talk to the cops thinking they’re smarter than them, without a lawyer present. Cuz If you’re like me and the common person then you probably don’t know ALL of your rights and the laws and also cops are allowed to lie to you, so it’s just not smart. Get a lawyer. They OBVIOUSLY don’t want to screw you over like a cop/detective would or trick you. They WANT you to win because that’s their job and it’s their reputation on the line.. understand?
@aunt jenifer they wanna catch you slipping but they aren't going in for a confession because they don't have a specific crime they think you have committed other then you speeding or having something wrong with your vehicle most times.
This guy thinks by calling the interrogators "brother" and "dude" and "man" and using military sounding language like "NEGATIVE" he will be seen as relatable.
@Samuel Ortiz I beat someone up that pulled a knife out on me an the guy that pulled the knife out phoned the police and said I beat him up then pulled a knife out on him. They were such arse holes to me in the interrogation room and kept telling me they saw the cctv and they knew that I beat him up and pulled the knife out, I shit my pants thinking I'm going to go down for years in prison but I found out they had absolutely no evidence on me at all. The guy I "pulled the knife out on" also ended up with a hash wound to his hand and apparently I did that, that's how pathetic and desperate the case was.
@Da Bossoh, right! I didn't pass road test. I had the learner's permit, and was in process of achieving driver's license. I was young at the time, not exactly best idea, but the outcome could have been way worse! Imo
I been found sleeping in my car once with the engine on at a store that closed like 3 hours ago or something. They asked if I was drinking, and I said yes and showed them that I drunk a whole bottle of smirnoff vodka. They just drove me home. But I will be honest, I think one of them was part russian, so I think he understood.
They were really nice to me when I was a witness to a crime. though to be fair, the circumstances were such that there was always a 0% chance I was responsible for the crime.
P Heresy2020-09-12 23:01:43 (edited 2020-09-12 23:09:27 )
@West Taiwan Oh yeah.... perfect advice. Nothing you say is helpful to YOU. Anything you say IS EVIDENCE, and will be used to put you away, even if you are innocent. If you have a lawyer, the lawyer can say anything needed, and none of it is EVIDENCE for anything. This is difficult to get across for many people. Imagine if he waited for a lawyer, the case would have gone differently. Police are motivated to close cases, with overwhelming evidence. What a gift for the police. He completely destroyed his own defense, while offering his statement. He identifies as being one "of the guys", like he was a fellow law enforcer. They let him believe that narrative, while they extracted every bit of evidence they needed.
Yes, and no. they will try to make you think you're friends when trying to pry info, but when i went to jail when i was 17 they were pretty chill and all i did was get in trouble for drinking in public and being underage
@michael boultinghouse yeah if they are worried about the police, wait till they get rid of the police. They think that people in the suburbs are going to sit around while a mob surrounds the neighborhood? If there is truly no police groups like this will get massacred.
@michael boultinghouse I wonder if people don't ask for a lawyer because either they think they didn't do anything wrong or if they ask for one then they look guilty.
@West Taiwan omg, ALWAYS - say you are in the right, you NEED a lawyer so you have a defense in a wrongful death lawsuit or any other personal injury/dmg claims
Usually police conduct multiple avenues of enquiries and investigation which results in a lot of poeple being cleared of any involvement, not the other way around. This in turn makes the eventual evidence against the accused more concrete, as investigations have cleared all others.
@Advanced Monkey nope. My girlfriend is, and she has gotten in a lot more trouble than I ever have just cus she's an asshole to the cops. I am a colored male. All it takes is being honest with them. Im not saying rat yourself out if you don't have to, but if you're kind it goes a long way since most people are not. I got pulled over doing 100mph on the freeway and I was honest about the reason why, and got let go without a ticket. I've been caught with drug paraphernalia. I used hard drugs for 8 years. All cops are not bad. Most are good people.
@Samuel Ortiz where are you headed? where are you coming from? you got ID? We got a call. I was in fear for my life. Where's your handicap placard? Not in that order.
Yeah I’ve noticed that just from this channel. When they start offer drinks and saying take your time and acting like they believe you. You’re fucked. What I don’t get is why none of these people ever have lawyers. ?
@michael boultinghouse So in the USA there are psychos who believe in marxism/comunism taking over the press...we have this type here in Brazil too...and also we have the same kind of lunatic president. Where the hell these folks came from?
Yup i am a recovering addict... ive been arrested twice. Second time they offered me a cigarette and i was like “FUUUUUUCKKKKK.” Usually you could BEG and they wouldnt give you one but they offered lol. Bd sign trust me.
@Jack Mehoffer Although some people do, you should never speak to police before a trial, even with a lawyer present. Waiting until trial forces them to provide any evidence they will use against you which gives you a big advantage and you won't lock yourself into a story early. A good lawyer won't let you speak to the police even if they are present
@West Taiwan this the most true shit i’ve ever seen people think it’ll make them look innocent if they talk to the cops without a lawyer but it’s never a good idea
@sky the weeb even if you don't feel like they think you did something. If you're still in custody, you're involved and anything you say might make you a suspect, either in the current crime or another.
13k likes? You gotta give the good ones out there alot of credit. I'd probably end up being a dick. I mean, I've had more uneventful experiences with them than frustrating ones.. and I've been arrested like 4 times.
@Gwen well we didn't just decide we needed law enforcement for no reason one day. There might need to be a harder vetting process, because you definitely don't need bad cops; but there are some good honest people out there.
The entire world seems to need an indifferent law enforcement system. Any part our law enforcement played in capturing slaves is despicable. Since I am a white fella, I can't put myself in black people's shoes, it's hard to grasp the thought of my whole race having been through what black folks have. If a white cop doesn't have the guts or the brains to treat a situation the same because of skin color, then he's a bad cop. There ain't no place in an impartial system for any of that. Then the ones influenced by greed can't be a part of it either. Im not saying that alot of change doesn't have to happen. I dang sure believe that humans have been around long enough to understand there's gotta be some law out there, and punishment for breaking it. People are to ruthless and selfish to go without it. Especially if they're scared. Sometimes it takes an actual damn war. The people with enough character to be a good cop are important. That doesn't make me some kind of rat.. you're stupid if you go around snitchin and you ain't a cop.
@Katrina Punkari especially if you're gonna do the dance and find yourself caught.. it's just not something you do. For a couple reasons. There's something else to be said about seeing something serious and being called as a witness. It'd have to be very serious for me not to feel very uncomfortable. That's part of what makes a cops job hard, they have to be prepared that people don't like divulging a whole bunch of stuff to the law. There might be some ripple effect that bites even an innocent person in the ass.
@Toby Nixon that makes no sense, when they have no evidence they are very careful, the person can stop talking at any time and ask for a lawyer. Once they already got incriminating proof they get more agressive
i have just met the nicest cops ever last week. They took my identity just to "check". I now know that they were reporting me and my father to an nature enviromental agency for fliying on our paragliders over some tree line. Yesterday i realized that we got fined with 450euros each...
@sergio urquijo I went to jail when I was 22 for a dui. I was drunk as shit nearly passed out in the side yard 50 feet from the car with the keys thown in the field somewhere.. way inside the property line when the cop pulled up. I told him I was on my property.. he shined his light on the tracks in the grass and said "that's how I know you were driving..". 12 hours in the drunk tank, and 500 bucks for a lawyer to write a letter to the judge and it was dropped. This guy just got mad at me and decided I was gonna get a DUI. People get stuck with that crap. There can't be cops like that, but people can't just be free to drive hammered either.
@Samuel Ortiz Then you don't get out much fella. That is for damn sure. Out of the 20 or so times I have had to interact with the police, in my 50 years of life, about 3/4 of them have been officers being overly assertive to outright bullying. Verbal abuse is pretty common.
I've been to court, judges are like this too - but for a different reason. My lawyer said the reason they are being mean is because they aren't going to send you to jail but are still trying to send a message and really make you to reflect on your actions because they know it was a mistake and not a severe crime. On the flip side, if it's just a career criminal and what they did was evil, the judges don't waste their breathe.
@ibyss Im black and any cop ive ever dealt with or have been arrested by was never a prick to me or most people I know that are also POC. With 90% of cops, if you show respect and act in a calm manner, you will recieve the same treatment, too many of our people think they can disrespect cops and talk to them like assholes and get surprised when they get the same treatment and wanna cry about race....smh watch a few episodes of Live PD and see how everyone is treated equal instead of victimizing yourself, brother, elevate your thinking snd stop trying to paint yourself as a victim
@Toby Nixon From experience, I can confirm this. Angry cops will swarm you, play mind tricks (lying), and theaten you (id est "we're gonna get dogs, or a warrant"), but eventually they just have to let you go because you refuse to admit to something you didn't even do ROFL. 😹
it's funny now, but at the time it was very nerve racking even though I knew I was innocent
@West Taiwan Lol people don't get how the judicial system works.
0 likes
Ari Kari2021-01-04 23:24:33 (edited 2021-01-04 23:25:39 )
@Professional Hater Well mom raised you right then!!! You are a model citizen if you’re polite and just yes sir no sir them. I’ve had some crappy experiences as a teen with cops calling me all types of slurs. My experience before that was positive I even had a great officer who would take our skipping school asses back to school with McDonald’s breakfast. But most recently during the lockdown I was almost ran off the road by 2 cops who wouldn’t even pull me over but sandwich me into the guardrail. One riding my tail at a slow speed (50mph, HW limit is 55) and one on my left. But I don’t hold that against all cops. Like all humans there are good ones and a s s h o l e s.
If the cops want to boost your confidence and act stupid like they’re believing your story you should be more aware because they’re waiting for you to incriminate yourself.
@Clee Boy I'd ask for a piece of paper and a pen with them thinking I'm going to write a statement. I'd write L-A-W-Y-E-R and push it back to them. lol
its an integrating room they dont act rude they r chill so the suspect doesnt get mad or feel any type of way to not answer questions so in this room they are nice to him for a reason
@Blu Peppers in the UK, they read tyour rights which are "You do not have to say anything. But, it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence". Plenty of prosecutors have use defendants being silent and emotionless when asked about serious crimes commited against a person as an indication of their guilt on involvement.
@tony F yes there is in BOP. we had TRULINCS. a limited email service but I have heard there are 4 that have complete internet access but VERY HEAVILY monitored. meaning teamviewer realtime type of monitoring
Yeah, in my experience you don't get much conversation in the initial contact. Just a few questions to set context, and these days they're pretty brusque. If they're being buddy buddy or more than standard polite, then they're setting the scene.
No matter how nice though, and no matter whether you're innocent or not, shut your piehole and ask for legal representation! Plenty of innocent people get locked up because they thought they were chatting to a buddy at the bar and thought that being helpful was the right thing to do as they walk into a dozen traps they didn't see coming, and incriminate themselves for a crime they didn't commit.
i really don't think they were being deceptive early on. being white and a legal gun owner will get you a long way in a lot ofsouthern police departments. luckily this guy was on camera and they had enough time to look at the video before interrogating him to catch him in all of his lies. also lucky this didn't take place 50 years ago, or might have gone home that night.
@West Taiwan for real, this whole, helping the police solve a case is bogus. You can help the police with a lawyer present who can save you helping them to a wrong conviction.
The correct use of a semi-colon is to separate two independent clauses and not a dependent clause and an independent clause as that is what a comma is for.
@He's got A Motor And those Americans are well aware that if they shoot an innocent person for no good reason, they’re going to jail for a long time. Just like how if someone robs a house they’re well aware that they’re breaking the law and that the house owner may have a gun to defend themselves
@Toby Nixon likes the video where they wrongly arrest some black dude for a jewelry store robbery. And the detectives were lying to him and this fucking Chad of a man gave off the most dominant body language and laughing in the cops face lol
Well, that’s not ALWAYS true. Sometimes cops can be nice when gather witness testimony. But if they read your rights to remain silent and then are acting nice to you, yeah you are in trouble.
@sky the weeb There's a great video on youtube of law professor James Duane giving a speech explaining why you should never give consent to any police interrogation or interviews without an attorney present, under any circumstances.
@Prettysag510 have you never seen any of jcs's vids before??? they are being nice as an interrogation tactic. be ignorant and racist though, im not gonna stop you.
Or its a way of getting info Of course theres the force. like raising your voice, getting 'hostile' Then I think being nice is sometimes a tactic. Make them feel safe, make them trus tyou and such.
dude should have had a lawyer. never talk to police - they are there to pin crimes on people if possible. thats the sad truth - but they need to do that dirty job, coz the weak need to be protected from bad guys (like the big guy assaulting that old man from behind no less).
The sheriff's office refused to prosecute him, though. Because in America, shooting people over a parking lot argument is seem as perfectly acceptable by some people.
@Thomas Flores it really was a simple question, YOU are making it into a bigger deal. Why does everyone hate POCs bringing up race when it is the reality of our existence, yall say that because you don’t live in. We see it in everything and yes, 90% of the time we are treated differently because of it. It’s like you guys just refuse to see facts
0 likes
Thomas Flores2021-09-28 11:23:01 (edited 2021-09-28 11:29:40 )
@*username* 90% is not a real number. You see things the way you want to see them. Everyone does. “Life’s what you make it” I believe is the saying. I know plenty of PoC that would say that their race has not been an obstacle in their life of any kind, and another, in the same community that cannot even talk to some PoC because they don’t feel like they understand their struggles. Doesn’t seem to matter that they’re both black. Their experiences were completely different. That’s why you can’t say “the reality of OUR existence” there is no OUR, there is no shared experience other than the one you create by making a series of comparisons. But that’s not reality. Reality is there are a million things at play that create just one persons positive or negative experiences, to pile them all up and throw a big race blanket over them like that’s the simple explanation that outweighs all the other million factors at play, is shortsighted, and small minded. Every race doesn’t have its own separate cookie cutter life that ever member of that group gets the same cookie.
@Thomas Flores we don’t throw a race blanket over everything, there are times when it is just obvious a person he racial biases. It’s kind of disgusting that you, as a none poc would try and undermine and experience you have never been through. I wouldn’t talk about how easy or difficult it is for a white man because I’ve never lived their life. There are certain instances were a spade is just a fucking spade man. Don’t come here and try act like institutional racism isn’t a thing, yes racism has improved and isn’t overt especially in any kind of legal case. It is a FACT (proven so argue with yourself) that black men are prosecuted 4 times the amount of white men. I live in the uk
Are you people serious!? Listen, I am liberal for the most part. I do think everyone has the right to own a gun tho. But wrong is wrong.
The black guy assaulted the guy first! The white guy was just talking and didn't do anything illegal.
You can say he was annoying or whatever but he didn't assault anyone. It's a free country. First ammendment. Say what you want but when you put your hands on someone and push them that hard to the ground, I no longer view you as the victim but the aggressor.
The black guy only retreated after he saw the gun pointed at him. It didn't matter if he was walking back at that point. The crime of assault was already committed. I am tired of my fellow liberals defending the suspects and victims of police violence no matter what they do. Resisting arrest, punching and cop, driving away, etc.
No one deserves to die for it but obey the law! Don't assault someone. Period. I dont feel bad for the guy who got killed in this situation at all. His girlfriend said, do I need to go get my man. They were the aggressors. The white guy was just annoying and nosy. But they were parked in the handicap parking spot which is also ILLEGAL!!!
@Milky Way so you think a push, deserves a gunshot? Not very liberal of you. Yes, don't push people. But also don't escalate the level of violence by shooting someone! Being a jerk isn't illegal. Murder is. Even though he was guilty of assault, he wouldn't have been give a death penalty, like he basically got. The other guy killed him, and was basically fine himself! The fact that they all were aggressors is not the point! You can get up from a shove, we can't bring back a life!
@Sarah Abramova So you think we have a 2nd amendment just to use against people who threaten us who also have a gun?
So if someone breaks into your home in the middle of the night and you don't know if they have a gun, what should you do...take a chance and pat them down first or ask them if they have a gun before opening fire??
Real life situations happen with 3 seconds like this incident. That wasn't a light push. He took a running start and pushed as hard as he could AND HE WALKED UP ON HIM, PULLED UP HIS SHORTS READY TO FIGHT ONCE HE GOT BACK UP....THAT IS THE PART THAT JUSTIFIES USING THE GUN.
I am so tired of others liberal defending everything the "victim" does. Literally everything. It is just as bad as Trump and his supporters never admitting fault.
The mother and father should have known better! They acted like that in front of their kids. Call the cops. Use your words. Never get violent. And never park in a handicap spot especially when you got so many other spots right next to it!!! Smh. Those were not good law abiding citizens so stop it.
@Milky Way also, logically speaking, if the black guy was aiming to kill, then why just push him if he did have a gun, stretching your already ridiculous hypothetical scenario? This guy had a gun, and it was his opening move.
0 likes
Sarah Abramova2021-12-04 02:56:55 (edited 2021-12-04 03:03:36 )
@Milky Way and it's not defending the victim at all. It's berating the killer. Learn the difference.
@Milky Way there is a difference between defending a person, and saying someone took things too far. THAT'S what we're saying. Grow up if you don't understand that. We aren't grade schoolers. We're adults, it's time for you to learn some nuance.
true statement. I’ve been interrogated before for something I didn’t do and I think they knew this but still tried to see what was up with me and oh boy were they rude.
At 20:25 is probably the most important point. He provoked a confrontation know he was protected without consideration for the other party”. This is the kind of guy I hate. He wanted to use his weapon he wanted to shoot someone that was trying to look after his loved one. Regardless of the parking situation
@Properly Gaming I was in a fairly bad situation once and I’ve could have gotten up to 10 year in prison and a 5000€ fine but the cops were genuinely nice to me they drove me back home gave me tea and talked to me for a bit I ended up getting everything sorted and I didn’t get a criminal record and I’m not planning to ever get one
they're only being nice to somebody bcuz they want and need information now if you notice they will be nice as long as they're getting what they want if they don't they get really pissed off. I always believe keeping your mouth shut and lawyering up is your best bet.even tho you won't get treated very nice and you're probly going to jail it's the best choice in the long run.
One time a guy broke into my house and I heard him out there for awhile so I had my gun drawn and was hiding behind my counter and when I heard the window break I was screaming get out or I’m gunna shoot you and he ran away so fast and the amount of relief I felt not having to do anything. I couldn’t imagine wanting that kind of confrontation
Why do some aholes insist on policing everybody else? If you’re that upset with her being parked there, either call the actual cops about it or just chill out and mind your own business.
Great video, interesting to basically hear a man say, "I've never been in a fight before and I thought a man was going to kill me because I've never been pushed before"
definitely not a justifiable homicide, when he pointed his gun at the attacker, there was no need for pulling the trigger as the attacker showed the sign of withdrawing
@Independence Boyd in this case looks like he is not the attacker but he clearly went beyond the self-defense and when he said "this is my shop" and so on that may prove he wanted to be in charge, have control etc. and made him going beyond the self-defense, but there is always a doubt
That is a tough one. You can not pull a weapon unless you are you in fear of your life. And you should pull out or discharge a weapon to scare someone or let off "warning shots". No brandishing.
@Adam Raciecki you completely missed the point. You’re not supposed to point a weapon unless you intend to shoot. In his mind, he could be correct in his immediate reaction. My point is not the end result of the case, my point is you should never take a weapon out unless you plan to use it. What happens in the split second between the weapon being removed from its holster and being fired is the debatable portion but leading up to that it’s reasonable to believe you should not simply point a gun unless you intend to use it to stop one’s behavior.
@Louis McCaII ok, I understand but let me flip a bit the assessment of the situation here, do you think removing a gun from the holster (but not firing it) would've been justified in that man's case?
4 likes
Louis McCaII2020-12-01 20:58:34 (edited 2020-12-01 21:51:16 )
@Adam Raciecki Yes. Unique state statutes aside, I do not see the issue with defending yourself in a tense scenario where you are blindsided, only to see a younger and stronger aggressor. The issue here is pointing the weapon as that would mean a greater level of threat is indeed in front of you. Pointing, coupled with hesitation makes one wonder about the nature of the threat as this was not necessary a split second decision. Basic legal counsel would have had a profound outcome.
@rudy falcone Conflating two issues. No one is saying the guy was right, but it’s not completely unreasonable and the hardest thing to prove is intent so you have no idea what could’ve happened in that scenario.
@submosphere That's a lie. The video clearly shows the attacker still moving forward after this guy got pushed on the ground. He was never "turning to go back to the store". He only started moving back when he realized he was armed. Which makes his testimony actually true ; the attacker did move forward while he was picking up his gun, he just clearly backed out afterwards
@Adam Raciecki you don't shoot people "just in case" when they display no life threatening qualities. If you get pushed tell your ego and small pp to calm down and not pull a trigger, maybe hit the gym more so you don't go flying like this man did.
@Skup Ire average human reaction time is about .3 seconds. He already had his weapon out and aimed. He was in that position for 2.5 seconds before he decided to fire.
@Skup Ire this also wasn't some wild wild west quick draw match. The other guy did not have a weapon present, so there was no imminent danger after his weapon was out and in position to fire.
@ben colbert damn, a whole 2.5 seconds. and that reaction time your quoting is superhuman, maybe if you count flinching with absolutely no conscious reaction id believe it was twice that
@KristapsJJ no, it would've been a total havoc, without jobs, no income from taxes, police as paid killers, mass killings, rapes and suicides, society collapsed
@Adam Raciecki still doesn’t justify it. I hope you don’t have a gun. And I’m not a liberal. You can just keep your gun on him... not pull the trigger as he’s backing up
@Jeremy Caulk there are no such things as warning shots. So that option is off the table, leaving doing nothing but stating you are alarmed or shooting to kill.
@JordanDrukqsz no amount of training in the gym would prepare you for getting blindsided like that. Your ass is going on the ground I don’t care who you are
@JordanDrukqsz or maybe people shouldn't assault other people. You think the guy shoves him to the ground if he knew he had a gun on him? I dont think so.
Shouldn't have attacked him in the first place play stupid games win stupid prizes he's dead other guys in prison only real loser in this is the man's kid
What justified the aggressor to assault the victim in the first place? The most common cause of death in street assaults is hitting your head on the concrete when the criminal knocks you down. What is wrong with shooting someone who just tried to murder you?
If he just wouldve kept a cool head then the other guy wouldve went to jail. Wouldve gotten right back out, but still, would have definitely been arrested. More black people these days should watch this. Maybe they'll learn to not go straight to violence no matter how much they hate white people
@submosphere He was still facing him, as he got shot in the chest, derp. You don't know what he was saying. Could have been threatening him, anything... best to get a lawyer regardless
He was turning around though and you could clearly see that. "You don't know what he was saying." Well if he said something really bad that made him shoot, wouldn't you think that Micheal would have told us what he said? He wouldn't keep his mouth shut about it because that would help his case.
@Adam Raciecki yeah, guns are mostly used for intimidation, if he attacked him again it would've been justified, but the situation is almost like, you step on my toe, i break both your hands. its a good thing he got time, cause that shot wasn't in self-defense
Attacker. Mans was pushed to the ground for shouting at a woman at a car for little to no reason. Pulled a gun and pulled the trigger on a man who pushed him. That's not eye for an eye. That's eye for a head
Why is nobody mentioning the fact that the victim parked in a handicap spot? Listen, I'm not justifying him being shot but I hate arrogant people who just think they can do anything they want - with an "IDGAF" attitude, such as parking in a disabled parking spot when they're not disabled. These types of people are scumbags. He did not deserve to be shot over this but unfortunately, he crossed somebody who was a little more arrogant than him that day and paid the consequences. Sorry but both the suspect and the victim can kiss my *
@customsongmaker the man didnt try to kill michael. he tried to get him away from his wife, whomst he was yelling and swearing at over a PARKING SPOT. and he landed on his elbow. he then waited 2.5 seconds on the ground w his gun out whilst the victim was backing up. Oh and, just to trigger you some more, this was definitely a racially motivated killing. This case would not have existed if the woman and kids in the car were white, instead of black.
I always stay in my lane and mind my own business. I let people do what they want to do and I do not interfere with others. This guy could have avoided this whole situation by just leaving these people alone 🤷🏼♀️
Or they shouldn't have illegally parked in a handicapped parking spot. The murder is wrong, but as a person who was in a wheelchair 19 years and now walks with crutches all the time I always applaud people berating people who aren't handicapped parking at these spots. He obviously took it too far. But not interfering wouldn't have prevented this any more than not parking there in the first place would have.
@alldamnnamesaretaken It was not a legal handicapped spot. It wasn't approved by the town. It didn't have the proper signage. The car was not illegally parked. Drejkas space was though
@alldamnnamesaretaken idiotic take. if you’re not law enforcement then don’t act like it. PERIOD. report the issue and go about your day, causing a scene and making an ass of yourself is never the way to go. it’s just a great way to make sure everyone loses.
@alldamnnamesaretaken apart from the fact that there is literally parking space all around them, the girl was literally in the car, if a handicapped person needed the space I'm sure she would've moved, either way the dude literally parked illegally taking even more space
Growing up a person like this was referred to by my parents as a "trouble maker" his interrogation proves that to be true. I feel for the victims family and friends.
That's the second case on the channel which was caused simply because stupid people had an access to the gun. As someone who weren't raised in USA where it seems people are drilled "more guns = more freedom" from the young age, it's just sad.
More guns generally means less freedom, because it allows enforcers to equip themselves dramatically better. It’s why the Governor of Colorado got away with deploying tanks and surface to air missiles to break up a protest back in 2015. You probably didn’t even hear about that because it struck everyone as reasonable given some of the most prominent protesters were actual combat veterans and theoretically could have been armed (they weren’t).
Yea actually absurd how big a ditch he dug just through acting pretentious. He's such a police wannabe it's insane. But the truth is just because you patrol and have a gun does not give you the right to use it...my god every time he said "negative" instead of "no" I vommed in my mouth a little lol
@Eric Borczuk This guy talks so arrogant, as you said with the negatives and the tough guy act, it makes me angry af, hes a perfect example of bad wannabe's.
@Greg Robinette yeah that dude wanted to say I’m so smart I really know what’s going on so bad that he ignores the fact that your comment is completely unrelated regardless of whether what he said is not is true there are still average people in society doing shit like this and getting arrested unless his point is anyone who does those crimes is in power which is pretty dumb.
The funny thing is a cop friend of mine has said interrogations now are all about letting the suspect talk. Let them talk long enough they’ll close the cell doors on themselves.
@Greg RobinetteA racist may get some justification, but they would have to invert theirselves into it because I don't see anything racial in this at all .
@Randy Bonner well its a white guy killing a black guy, racists will defend Drejka for the sole reason of "a black life was erased", Drejka is probably not a racist, he talks like the avg white supremacist, they are all soldier wannabes, but I mostly think Drejka acted on the delusion that he owned the parking spot
@Tony from my minimal understanding, lawyer and attorney are the same, and prosecuter is the lawyer/attorney that is on the suing party. Or maybe lawyer and attorney means defense only
@Tony I'm talking about the suspect. He creates all the evidence for the prosecution and they don't even need to dig for anything. He pretty much handed everything to them. They could probably just show them the video of the incident and the interrogation and they would have had a guilty verdict.
Sorry for the confusion. I just realized that this guy is very vague and it could also be referring to the interrogator.
The sole purpose of ofc rehashing the incident @14:45 is to begin creating contradictions by inserting the police officers language to incriminate the defendant. Not the defendants words but a variation that he can further manipulate to the police officers criminal narrative. The product created with this technique is not the defendants statement but the Ofc narrative of a crime.
Never ever ever ever speak to a police officer. He is 100% of the time is going to lie. Don't speak at all let your lawyer speak at trial.
This isn't good police work this is scientifically designed deception. Carried out by a chud police officer patting himself on the back.
@Kaitensatsuma the inability to correctly articulate sentences put more people in prison than any police officer. The only thing this guy is guilty of is letting that officer feed him the cops narrative. Never ever speak to any government official even if you think you can help.
@Hairy Balling They didn't need him to contradict himself, there's video proof of him lying. His first recollection before he was asked to repeat it was a lie too, he insisted that his victim was about to "start finish what he started" when it shows him backing off once the gun is in view.
Then he started embellishing to make it sound like he was about to get jumped on by someone standing above him, "ready to charge".
The best or possibly worst part? When asked if he could change anything, anything at all there wasn't even a brief moment of "Well, I suppose I wish he hadn't died" coming across his mental state.
@Kaitensatsuma My dear, it is understandable that you believe this case turns on "His first recollection" which are your are your own words.
The defendant, incorrect or not is not the question. State of mind is determined by "his perception" not yours or a video tape. It is the state of mind of the defendant or more correctly stated, weather he has a guilty mind. That is what is punished in the US.
Is it reasonable for the defendant to react with his defense training to attacked from behind and violently knocked to the ground in a vulnerable position?
Well? Try attacking a police officer from behind and knocking him to the ground and see if he doesn't employ the exact same defense.
Was he civilly wrong? He could be possibly liable in civil court, criminally he isn't guilty because he believed what he recounted as his first impression. Catching someone wrong in their memory of events is not a crime or evidence of a crime.
@Hairy Balling No sweetie, I don't believe that the case turned on his first recollection, that was something that you entirely implied on your own when you insisted that the, let's see, that the guy was guilty of "Letting the cops feed him his narrative" and that "The sole purpose of ofc rehashing the incident @14:45 is to begin creating contradictions by inserting the police officers language to incriminate the defendant." - Your words, not mine.
Now, that's an adorable misunderstanding of what happened in that video, it's so cute it's honestly something a little child would think of, like, again, they didn't have video evidence and reasonable case to make if the prosecutor wanted to take it up. I could just pinch your little cheeks.
Was this man a police officer? No Did anyone argue that he didn't get assaulted? Also no Did he, absent of any immediate threat to his life, use excessive force? Yes Did he admit - with little additional questioning - that he was in a rational state of mind, capable of rational decision making? Also yes.
And that's the way the cookie crumbles! Did I argue that you are wrong about not talking to police? Of course not, the first thing he should have asked for was a lawyer.
Did he think he was enough of a Chad Pro-Police CCP license holder who read the USCCA website front to back? Seems like it.
I checked the timer....this guy : https://youtu.be/hQAC2pPVu88 lasts exactly 7 seconds before incriminating himself in "to catch a predator" with Chris Hansen he goes on to confess crime after crime after crime, because "[he] has a compulsion for young girls"
He's trying to talk like a cop because he thinks the law is on his side. That's so pathetic. And the fact that he fucking killed a guy who just pushed him and made him scrape his arm is just so so scary.
He had zero remorse during the whole interview / interrogation. Unbelievable. He better not step on the wrong line in the prison in next 20 years othwrwise someone may do the " self-defence" that he done to someone. Enjoy the prison. You deserve every bit of it
it was reported he got beaten by a few black inmates and they stated "thats for your victim!" when the family heard, they said they never made a deal with anyone to hurt him. so yeah, hes walking around with a target on his back
@Biaru i hear you, but there is a difference between pushing someone, and taking their life.. should he have full on shoved him? No. Does that in anyway justify the shooter for taking a man’s life? Absolutely not.
5 likes
Herbert West2022-05-31 11:47:21 (edited 2022-05-31 11:47:34 )
@舜帝 We learn from as young as kindergarten what the appropriate response to physical provocation is. Hint; it's not murder.
Amy Warren ugh, I just watched that one again last night. I can’t get over the fact that these two both referred to themselves as “the real victim here!” (This one by proxy).
Dunn did so repeatedly... in a phone call that he knows is being recorded, yet somehow he can’t help but keep saying shit like “they’re violent” and that he’s glad he’s not in a cell with “those animals”... you can just hear the grin in his voice. It’s sickening.
I knew from a few minutes in that he would be a serial pest thinking he's a police officer. I wonder how many times he's called the police on his neighbours.
Buddy ass thought he was justified going home to some ass. Oh yeah officer I took one shot as he stepped to me and I just feared for my life but I didn't over do it I only shot once. Then footage literally show us dude pushed him, stood there, seen the gun and backed up instantly, never even came forward. This guy just got the biggest goofy of the year award
The Humblebrag Conviction is actually the working title of John Grisham's next legal thriller. Looks like another Hollywood adaptation is in the works for ol Johnny boy.
@Special Investigations Unit why do you sound like on of them teens that watched that bloke drowned one of them kept saying "Buddy ass" what part of murcia uses that.
I haven’t even watched video yet and read this with no context. I chuckled to my self and now am ready to enjoy and laugh at what I’m about to watch. Update after the video to come.
@Mark Acklin a example like "i was walking to the store and i seen someone litter. So i rightfully removed the trash from the sidewalk and put it into the can. Its what anybody would do!" Of humble vrag
Saw this comment at the top before the adverts even stopped playing, and it’s made me very excited to see the video... but in a way I think is ultimately going to upset me
Edit: 3 mins in and I already know my initial reaction to this comment was wrong. This is just disgusting
My ex humble bragged about his bank account when he started making $100/hr and then laughed at my broken down car. I hope he has a good time sleeping with his money at night.
Funniest part is knowing the cops are gonna turn from friends to his worst enemy but he has no idea at all so he’s talking away half way through he’s getting defensive lol
In case you’re wondering, the guy has no defense training, military training, or law enforcement experience. Hearing him respond “negative” to everything is hilarious. Like an ROTC kid
Public Service Announcement $100/hr is way more than enough to put a few nice women in that said bed and have a good time to humble bragged about later
The fact that he kept the gun pointed at him while he was running back into the store is just infuriating. I imagine that he was just living out his fantasy of being a ‘’heroic" cop, and he was enjoying it.
Yes please because while I agree with a lot of these theories as to how people behave. I know that not all of them are true for me and would get me in trouble if I was innocent. Lol
I'd like to see the difference between one who is completely not guilty and ones (like him) who don't FEEL guilty or as if they did a single negative thing
@Gordon Alias Me The Michel Rafferty case was the one where he kidnapped an 8 year old, did inappropriate things to her and then killed her, there was no gun? no bullets involved??? as far as i was aware, just rewatched that one the other day and there was no mention of a bullet???
0 likes
Gordon Alias Me2021-12-26 09:07:13 (edited 2021-12-28 17:12:36 )
@Golly GodMy bad . Wrong name Ryan Waller, I think. Interrogated by Detective Dalton, bad cop
1 like
Rob Oc2022-05-17 12:50:05 (edited 2022-05-17 12:50:56 )
So this guy walks around strapped looking to start shit with people and prepared to kill them if desired or if he feels scared. I consider him a threat to the community.
This guy terrifies me because he's not a psychopath, he's not a sociopathic narcissist, he's not a serial killer, he genuinely believes that it's perfectly okay for him to murder a man after physically confronting the man's wife and face zero repercussions because "Well, they were doing something wrong and I'm jumpy with my gun." There are millions of Punisher-wannabes out there with this asshole's exact mindset trying to play vigilante, and the police are completely oblivious that they are worshiped by these trigger-happy animals.
bruh how the fuck did he physically confront the man's wife?? it was a verbal confrontation at worst, and that's only if you're really that keen on calling it a confrontation; after all, he was just trying to explain to her that she isn't allowed to park where she had, and get her to park elsewhere, or at least get out of that parking spot I seriously don't understand how everyone is venerating Drejka but meanwhile disregarding the fact that the other guy punted him to the ground.. he was not even slightly warranted in tackling and shoving him like that, like wtf everyone?
@David Sermek from what I know, if you were in this situation, you wouldn't know what the man was confronting your wife about. You are shopping and notice through the window that this older man is taking pictures of your vehicle, pointing and yelling at your wife, and you go out there and push him to get him away from her. He doesn't have the knowledge of why the man was confronting his wife, just that an older man was yelling and harassing her, photographing, and circling her car, while he and their child were in the store. it's obvious he noticed through the window because his child stayed inside the store and didn't come out with him. I believe he absolutely thought his wife was in danger and was trying to protect her from a creep, which obviously he was because of what we know about this man now. Did he maybe push him a little hard? Sure, but I completely believe he genuinely was concerned for his wife, and I have to say I would be the same way.
@David SermekI believe the words used in the video was a “verbal altercation”. The victim saw a stranger getting into a shouting match with his wife, and while shoving’s not my first response, I know I’d see red if that happened with me and my partner. At any rate, Drejka could have minded his own business about parking of all things.
2 likes
Victoria Pitts2022-06-04 07:47:02 (edited 2022-06-04 07:48:55 )
@David Sermek because it’s not his job to enforce the law, not to mention DREJKA WAS ALSO PARKED ILLEGALLY AT THE TIME HE CONFRONTED THIS WOMAN. He had no right to tell anyone how to park anywhere and he definitely didn’t have the right to take a life because he was pushed over some bs that he started. Get real dude.
If your first response to getting shoved, just a freaking PUSH, is to take out a gun then you’re pathetic and you need prison, just like Drejka.
@David Sermek Sorry, but no self respecting husband would ever put up with a man approaching his wife the way the shooter approached the woman. Most men classify another male who is within arms reach of his woman and being verbally aggressive towards his woman is a physical threat. In that scenario you will invoke the protective instinct of the woman's man.
We can only speculate how the husband perceived the threat potential of the male acting aggressively towards his wife. The husband's perception resulted in his decision that physically removing the threat from proximity to his wife was deemed necessary.
It is very likely that Mike, feeling emboldened knowing that he had the fire arm, would have persisted in acting aggressively even towards the husband if the husband and simply engaged him verbally. Mike has a history of acting aggressively towards others and it is plausible to conclude that Mike might have pulled the gun on the husband regardless of what the husband did.
Drejka truly believes he was the hero in this situation. Everything he ever learned has been filtered in his head and changed the original meaning. He justifies all his actions, and embellishes those of others. Crazy.
Notice how when he is alone in that room he can move his right arm around freely and without any problems but as soon as the detective steps in he takes it off and isn’t even able to shake hands with the right.
Average joes who talk like this are super duper cringe
30 likes
Steven Glikin2021-06-11 21:03:19 (edited 2021-06-11 21:03:33 )
@Blackened Featherz anyone who talks like this is cringey af, in my unit we only talk like that through a radio, and laugh at each other when we accidentally bring it into face to face or normal conversations
Lotta people in uniform say "copy that" and "negative". Nothing wrong with it as long as you're not a complete tool and a poser 😂
8 likes
Steven Glikin2021-06-21 22:18:00 (edited 2021-06-21 22:19:03 )
@Daily Dissent nah dude, in my unit it's cringy and made fun of all the time unless it's on the comms. people need to differentiate between language in day to day life and language for the comms and operational life
I love how he used the word “neutralized” to get understanding from the cops and looked to them for approval, but the cop pretended like he had no idea what the word meant and said “What do you mean by that?” Lmaooo
He’s role playing more like a mercenary…he came there with intent to interrogate and hopefully execute people…he’s been watching Deathwish too many times 😯
It sounded like the investigators were almost begging him to say he was fearful for his life, and the guy just couldn’t take a hint and instead kept digging himself into a deeper hole.
To anyone trying to defend this dude, one of the first things he said is "he hit me from behind" He knows he had to lie cause he has no legal justification for shooting him down.
This person is such a coward. He wants enforce laws, even though it’s not his job. But someone pushes him and he shoot’s him instead of defending himself with his hands like a real man. This guy is pathetic and weak.
And these types almost always are middle to upper middle class men in suburban environments who despite, or perhaps, because of their material security, feel the need to larp as rambo if (poor) criminals step up to them. They’re also massive dorks.
Note that this shouldn’t be taken as a blanket statement on responsible gunowners, but rather a specific type of person who if they didn’t own guns would be just as confrontational or even call the police on little cause.
Exactly. Who knows, maybe the woman and/or kids are disabled. Not like getting one of those damn "handicapped" parking plates are easy to acquire. Either way, this was not a life or death situation. Drejka should have minded his own business and left this family alone.
@Japheth Grimm Maybe the mother (who isn't disabled) should've parked somewhere else and led by example in front of her kids (who also aren't disabled). Maybe the father should've asked what was going on first instead of initiating physical violence. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes 🤷♂️
@Rob Oc you don't know who is disabled and who isn't. Regardless, that guy should have minded his own business and nobody should have been shot.
4 likes
Rob Oc2022-05-17 16:04:23 (edited 2022-05-17 16:08:22 )
@Japheth Grimm the mother shouldn't be parking in spaces that are reserved for people with disabilities. The fact that the space was used and no one with a disability left the car is pretty ignorant. Not to mention, arrogant. Nobody would've been shot had the father approached the situation with civility. He acted in violence because of words. The subsequent response was wrong but so was every action leading up to that
@Rob Oc again, you don't know who is disabled and who isn't. You can't always look at someone, especially with a few seconds of grainy video, and determine whether or not they are disabled. Once again, that guy should have minded his own business and nobody should have been shot. There's nothing more to it than that.
@Japheth Grimm well I live in a country that calls out ignorant and arrogant people like that. If they were disabled, they would've had some sort of pass or sticker on their car. But they didn't. If anyone was disabled, it would've been a pretty big factor in the case. Considering it's not mentioned once, it's doubtful. Unless you know something the detectives don't? You're clutching at straws and it's embarrassing. People like them would get called out where I live. The arrogance is palpable and the people where I live wouldn't tolerate it. Then again, I don't live in a crazy gun toting country. It's incredible you're not even able to admit the family were wrong to park there to begin with.
@Rob Oc it doesn't matter what country you live in. I am a disabled person. I know plenty of other disabled people as well. It is ridiculous how difficult it is to get a placard for a vehicle, and even far more difficult than that to get a designated license plate, here in the USA.
There was no justifiable reason for that man to approach that family; and far less justification for anybody to have been shot. It's disgusting and disturbing how you refuse to stop justifying the shooter shooting anybody.
I do agree that Drejka shouldn't have been pushed, but if a random guy was snooping around my car with the mother of my children and aggressively speaking to her, as a man I would've considered doing the same thing. The evidence is clear that as soon as Drejka pulled out his fire arm the other man began to back away several steps before being shot. Drejka didn't give him a warning, shoot him somewhere that couldn't potentially end up fatal. Nothing. Not only that but he's had encounters with other people in traffic negatively and threatened them with his gun. All this over a parking spot he didn't even need himself. He was looking for a fight. He easily could have calmly said to the lady that it's rude to park there when she doesn't need to be and end of conversation. Bickering back and forth does nothing but cause a fight. He has no remorse for what he did and said he wouldn't have changed what he did. Hope he never sees his dogs again.
I agree with a good chunk of what you said but one thing I wanted to mention is a point that is very often misunderstood. You said that he could have threatened him with the gun or shot him somewhere that wouldn't be as lethal. That's a very common mistake a lot of people make, and I understand why. "Common sense" would say anything that can be done to avoid killing someone is better than killing them, but what changes that is the presence of a lethal weapon. The short of it is that if you draw a firearm on someone, you SHOULD be shooting to kill. The reason is that, A: shooting to wound/warming shots are irresponsible and dangerous as a stray round could hit someone else and even shooting someone in an extremity can be lethal, from blood loss, shock, etc. and B: a firearm is a lethal weapon, so if you draw a firearm, you're doing so with the known risk of death, so to pull it out to "threaten" someone in the hopes they go away without shooting admits that you still believed that there was a chance the situation could be resolved without killing them. You're admitting through your actions that you opted for the lethal option without believing it was wholly necessary. The same goes for wounding someone. This is something that very few people seem to realize, and I figure a good portion of that is due to media (entertainment as well as news) and humans' natural instinct not to harm other people. Now, there are some things that change that depending on the situation and your duty as a private citizen vs. a government official (are you obligated to flee from or confront the threat) or if the nature of the threat changes on the fly, etc., etc., but for the most part, if you draw a lethal weapon on someone, the assumption is that you believe lethal force is necessary.
@Danny J She was parked illegally but she didn't take the space from Drejka. There were MULTIPLE empty spots MUCH closer to the door so, unless someone pulled in in a handicapped van there was really no problem. Drejka is NOT the parking police nor is he the owner of the store therefore it was NOT his place nor his right to harass her about parking there. If he was so disturbed by it he should have either stayed in his car and called the police or gone inside and let the clerk/manager know. about it and let THEM handle it.
@Danny J I watched the sentencing. The judge gave an excellent detailed step by step explanation of this incident and why it was not self defense. The judge also brought up previous incidents provoked by Drejka. Drejka was a wanna-be cop who appointed himself lot monitor of the convenience store parking lot. The store owner had told Drejka about confronting people for using the H/C parking space, saying something along the lines of "it's not worth it. You're going to run into the wrong person one day." Reportedly Drejka replied, "That's why I carry."
The judge also noted how ironic it was that when Drejka drove into the lot to confront the woman parked in the H/C space, he himself parked illegally. Supposedly Drejka would sit in his car across the street and watch the H/C space. When someone without a H/C placard or plate parked in the H/C space he would drive into the lot kinda Starsky & Hutch style to confront them. I don't know what kind of car he drove, but I'd bet money it was a Crown Vic.
excellent lessons to be learned by viewers though. after seeing all these videos, including the innocent ones, i am not talking to any of these guys without a lawyer.
@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ , anything you say in the interrogation can be used to incarcarate you. if you say nothing, which is completly legal, you have a much better chance of being proved not guilty.
@Luis Sanchez well innocent people are coerced into confessing a crime they didn’t do all the time, so whether you did it or not you should always ask for a lawyer and never say a word to the cops
@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ , advise you on what info you should and should not answer too how much you should divulge, and to what level of detail. generally a lawyer is gonna try and keep you from saying anything that will throw them the case
@Wolfsit The man could've busted his head open on the concrete. Don't assault other people, and you don't get shot. Simple.
5 likes
Moral Lita2021-06-03 01:45:24 (edited 2021-06-03 01:46:27 )
@trollolol could've is operative. Does possible injury warrant murder? Why not just press charges and waste everyones time and money, now someone's father doesn't have time with their kids to watch them grow up.
@Deathw1sh. Totally agree, the police are always " if you're innocent, there's no need for a lawyer and we won't be able to help you once you lawyer up" which translates to "if you're an idiot, there's no need for a lawyer and we won't be able to trick you or into saying something incriminating". Side note, if you get arrested and are actually innocent , never agree to do a polygraph as generally non criminal people will be very anxious about what's going on and can easily fail a polygraph (At least that's what my criminology teacher taught us). Also , I am not trying to be anti police at all just pro individual rights. 😜
Except they literally let the man go after the interrogation, and he was only taken off the street weeks later by instruction of the district attorney. The cops literally wanted to let him go.
Even though they deserve it I still get second hand embarrassment
3 likes
Luke Sargent2021-09-23 22:33:48 (edited 2021-09-23 22:37:21 )
He wasn't fucked yet, though. The detective sheriff deputy believed him and let him go, but the DA prosecuted him. He left a free man after this interview. That's why JCS put considerable emphasis on the fact that he didn't believe that his life was in danger at the time he was pushed. The district attorney chose to charge him with the crime because he gave no indications his life was truly in danger. He should have remained silent and spoken to a lawyer, but that would have most likely led to an arrest on probable cause.
Not so much letting the suspect know as much as letting tge suspect unknowingly incriminate themselves. When your freedom is on the line dont ever conswnt to these "casual" interviews... Everything you say from then on needs to be well thought out from every perspective because it can and will be held against you.......you know the rest
If he pushes him and he hits his head he could die. In my opinion that is lethal force. Many people have died in fights. I also believe physical blows are lethal force. So I think it is more complicated than you suggest. Do I think he's a good guy? No, but do I think it is ok to sprint and push someone to the ground? Also no. I don't think it is ok to physically assault someone unless you are defending yourself. The dad should have been more mature and not so quick to escalate the situation. He should have handled that without sprinting and throwing someone to the ground unless his family was in danger.
I should clarify that I don't think he is in the right for taking a father from his kids. Especially since he took a step back. I'm not taking his side but I'm saying they were both in the wrong.
@Bellicose 20 yea right bud, if he did anything OTHER than run up and immediately shove someone to the ground would have surprised me. If you haven't seen a million other people just like him then you've never lived in a big city before, talking through a situation is not really their modus operandi. Best to just ignore and avoid, unless you want to be in jail for shooting someone because that would be the only way to 'win' any kind of encounter here.
@mazystarr I’m confused… you think it was wrong for a man who stopped at a convenient store with his family minding his own business, when all of a sudden the people in the store start yelling and screaming that a man outside is being crazy and yelling at a woman in the parking lot, he walks out to make sure it’s not HIS wife/kids and when it IS he pushes the man AWAY from his wife. He didn’t walk up out of nowhere and punch a random guy in the face???!! That man literally said he was coming from the damn WAWA down the road!! He full on only stopped when he saw a car parked n that spot and he wanted to make sure it was someone parked there legally because as he stated…”people do it everyday and it’s my pet peeve” If you wouldn’t come out and push some lunatic who is screaming at your wife and kids, then I feel really bad for your wife and kids. People like you are the reason why we have such a disgusting society.
@Bellicose 20 I don’t know if your a man or women but I find it troubling that A, if your a woman and your in your own car with your young children in the back and some crazy man pulls up and starts taking pictures or your license plate and then comes around and takes pictures from the front where you can clearly be in them and then the guy starts yelling and walking up to your car, you wouldn’t want someone, anyone, but especially your husband to push the guy away from you and your children? B, as a man you wouldn’t try to protect your wife and children from a crazy man who when you walk out is yelling and approaching your family? That man is a clear psychopath and who knows if the husband didn’t come out and he kept yelling and arguing with the woman, would he have shot her if she moved her hand to get her phone? It seems extremely possible that could have been another outcome. So to say that anyone else other than Michael was in the wrong here is absolutely disgusting.
@meganjerai he could of handled it different. it was not smart to just run up on someone and shove them. you gotta be smarter than that. especially nowadays you dont know who is a psycho walking around with a gun. I never get into an altercation with anyone for that reason. if some punk is tailgating me I move and get out of their way. if someone tries to start something with me I back away and get out of there asap. because I'm not losing my life over some punk having a bad day or some loser wanting to act out his cop fantasy.
Pushing someone away from your partner, who is being yelled at and abused by this, is self defence. He was protecting his wife because he thought she was in danger. Pushing isn’t wrong. Not in this case.
@Bellicose 20 Yea I agree, the other guy was in the wrong too, the irony is that if Drejka was a normal and good law abiding citizen he could have actually pressed charges for being pushed like that. But instead he prefers to be a murderer....
That's debatable (whether he should have fired) but yes, pushing someone to the ground IS justification for pulling your weapon aka defending yourself.
You are right on the first part: the husband shouldn't have turned a verbal argument into a physical one.
I’m feeling like people are always looking for a reason these days. Best minding my own business, folks are crazy or the littlest things. Like the say, you never know. People are insane
@Melissa Coulter Defending someone does not necesseraly imply pushing by surprise someone to the ground so hard he could break some of his bones. Especially not when you're defending the person from the terrible agression of being talked too loud.
@Brooklyn B3 considering your perspective, which i really don' believe as honnest, in what kind of logic, yelling at someone allows you to assault the yeller and would make it self defense, because you suppose that it implies danger even though there was no phisycal harm no danger and no threat to her life. But in the other hand, getting assaulted by surprise, being pushed to the ground wich implies physical harm and possible threat to life, would be less legitimate as a reason to react with self defense ?
@Melissa Coulter you are thinking with your emotions just like they were and look how that ended up. I would protect my wife by going outside, asking what's going on, and calling the police. Like a rational responsible adult. Taking pictures of a license plate and arguing with a woman isn't actually assault or cause to assault someone in the real world. I have two cauliflower ears to prove I can beat someone's ass, but I know that the best fights are the ones you don't get in. Especially when crazy people own guns and you have kids. You are imagining a world where men defend their wives and everyone sings praises and nothing bad happens to the hero, but in real life sometimes the hero gets shot and killed. There were other ways to deal with that where cooler heads prevail. Just because reality isn't pretty doesn't mean I don't want to defend my wife.
@mazystarr I live in a metro will just over a million people, I am not denying that these people exist, I am merely stating that they are in the wrong.
@Bellicose 20 I'm actually on the fence on this one. He was physically assaulted. I've seen "Stand Your Ground" cases that didn't even come close to this and never make it to a courtroom. I think any person that does this is a douche but as far as crimes go? The USA is the wild west and this guy goes to prison? It don't add up.
I'm no trained professional in confrontation but I would have to agree with his assessment. "If someone comes at me like that, I'm assuming their coming back for more".
Really tough call this one. A better lawyer would have got him off. Keeping silent would have too.
@StereoPatios Seeing how I have seen people literally shoot another for far less, and get off, numerous times, I'm scratching my head on this one. He was literally assaulted right?
@Christopher Chamberlain How are you confused? He literally provoked this whole situation…going out of his way to play handicapped police, verbally attacking a woman while she’s just sitting on her car with her kids and taking pictures of some random lady’s license plate is NOT ok!
Pushing him to the ground was wrong. And also, why park in a handicapped? But what about "de-escalate." Twenty years for manslaughter seems excessive. And also the decision by prison authorities to allow black prisoners to beat him up. Florida should admit they are not enforcing "stand your ground."
Interviewer : Is there anything you would change , looking back? Suspect: No...? That shows why you belong in prison. The correct answer is " Yes ! I would never have approached the car." This stunning lack of insight and entitlement puts the suspect at risk for reoffending.
If a guy is running at you and still coming…by the time you fall, get your weapon, raise your weapon prop your weapon with the other hand, he would be on top of you before you turn over in that distance
This guy so righteous, I can’t tell if he’s blatantly fabricating or if he is just one of those people that can’t fathom that he’s in the wrong so in his mind he actually remembers it the way he needs it to go.
The worst part is this guy could get the longest sentence and would never feel remorse because he really believes he is right…even if a video shows he’s wrong he would still disagree…craziness
He was so happy to find out he went from a victim to a killer, someone like him doesn't shoot someone because he wanted to deter him. He shot him because he wanted to kill someone.
this guy was so ready for the approval from law enforcement, he spilled the beans on everything. the investigators played their hand very well, too - never seeming too judgmental, so he'll continue to elaborate on his motivations and intentions
Oh yeah, he said literally everything that could incriminate him. I feel like you could just sense the absolute dumbfoundedness when he says “it felt like a split second” and the officer just says “ok......... alright Micheal uh, we’ll be right back.”
Hadn't thought about it much until now, but the detectives in these videos are genuinely just trying to get the truth and enforce justice by the book. By no means does this represent all of peace keeping, but it does a good job of showing how it is done when done correctly.
These videos are strangely reassuring. I hope if I'm ever in a bad situation, I have one of these detectives figuring out what happened. Fingers crossed that this comment ages well.
@la pace sia con voi yes. but the perspective of Michael, on the ground, as the attackers body turns, it looks like he was coming at him, and dazed and confused he reacted with one shot. bad luck for the attacker, he could have lived. he needs to appeal , and get a better lawyer, that wont allow video manipulation to fool the jury. slow motion and pausing , is not reality of decision making. THEY FOOLD THE JURY. He needs a lot of help after this.
it was on surveillance. how was it video manipulated? if the shooter was dazed and confused, he shouldn't carry a fire arm. the attacker backed off. even if mr drejka did not see that (which i don't believe. he was trigger happy), again he shouldn't be allowed to carry a fire arm. you don't shoot over an off guard bch shove
@la pace sia con voi there showing it in slow motion. and pausing reality. Also, the perspective is high and angled down. The perspective of Mikael is low and angled up. wHEN I FIRST SAW THE VIDEO, FOR ME, IT looked as if he did step towards him. after watching again, i was looking at his legs , not torso, you clearly see the attacker steps back. However again, after getting slammed to the GROUND HARD., from behind,!!! getting hurt and disoriented , in the split second, NOT PAUSED, NOT SLOW MOTION, He defended himself, and from the perspective of Mikael, not looking at legs, ONLY HEAD AND TORSO, ...IT WILL SEEM FOR A SECOND, HE WAS GOING TO CONTINUE TO ATTACK.... THIS IS MY OPINION. i FEEL BAD THE ILLEGALY PARKED ATTACKER DIED. BUT HE DID START THE VIOLENT ASSULT FIRST .....AND ILLEGALY PARKED.. PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT , AS MUCH OF A DICK MOVE IT IS, PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO TALK, AND EXPLAIN LAW, WITHOUT GETING VIOLENTLY PUSHED TO THE GROUND. They also plated the race card. ITS GETTING OLD. Being black does not give you the right to illegally park and violently push people to the ground because your mad they calling you out. WHAT IF MIKEAL WAS A COP. ALL CERCOMSTANCE THE SAME... PRETEND, IMAGINE, WHAT WOULD THE COURT CASE BE LIKE.....? EXACTLY, THERE WOULNT BE ONE. THE ATTACKER WAS KILLED, BECASUE HE ATTCKED WITHOUT PROVOCATION.
he defended his life so he could spend it in prison. i thought what if that was a plain clothes officer. the victim would have assaulted in officer. i don't believe a trained officer would make a bch move like that or be off guard to someone rushing him from behind. if he did, the whole town would be on fire. i'm sorry too.
It baffles me why these interviews last longer than 5 minutes. Even if it was a clear cut case of self-defense, the only sane thing to do is to ask for a lawyer straight away.
The average person that is in these interview rooms isn't very intelligent. They don't realize how screwed they are. They think that they can talk their way out of the room.
@HamsterFromAbove Yes, however it's like being without boxing experience and taking on a heavyweight Olympic boxer. It's uneven from the start, and there is no way they can win.
I like (in a morbid kind of way, I know this is a homicide and all) how the detective starts explicitly and clearly asking him "So you never heard a threat? Didn't say anything to him? No indication that he was going to continue attacking you?" at around 25:00 . Again, mind you, I'm aware that this is a real case and someone actually died, not trying to make light of it or 'root for' the suspect, but part of me was just going "dude should have asked for a lawyer, because he's handing the prosecution the case on a silver platter in that part of the conversation. This is textbook 'what not to say to cops'."
This situation for this man and his poor family who had to witness him be shot in front of them is so horrific. Prayers for his family ❤❤
6 likes
lee K2022-03-25 00:21:58 (edited 2022-03-25 00:23:34 )
You can just tell that michael always wanted to use his gun. Its a sad case where 2 families have gotten destroyed just because because michael thought it was the only solution to end a fight. Michael killed a man that stepped up for his wife and kids. Even though the man shouldn't have pushed michael. Shooting was defenitely not the answer. He might felt threatened but thats never a reason to kill a father, a aggressor or just a loving man that backed away when the gun was pointed at him. There are no winners in this case. I just hope michael will come clean and feels bad ending a fathers life for a push. He got shot and killed right in front of the eyes of his kids and wife. Rest in peace and i really hope their families will do good without any fathers around. My thoughts go out to them and its just sad. No more words needed.
i live nearby where this took place, and drejka absolutely had a reputation for being a loudmouth vigilante. a co worker of mine claims he got into a verbal altercation with him once, and i don’t doubt his claims.
Draco was named as the aggressor in for prior Road incidents I am not a grammar Nazi I just have grammar OCD. And I use the phone auto dictate, that’s why it says Draco. And who are we to judge Draco may well have been named in for prior road incidents. Thank you for the info.
@jjcoola998 derp.... Sure there is and every person that slights you for whatever reason is racist too right? Seriously if you spend all your time looking for it, don't be surprised you find it when it's not even there....
Imo this case is what happens when three idiots/hit heads collide. Natural selection occurred, 1 hot head leaves wit their life, without their loved one and without a felony. When stuff like this happens, it’s best to leave the situation. If a crazy person approaches your car, don’t engage, leave. The shooter was definitely justified but at the same time wasn’t as he had caused the entire conflict imo, this is why you don’t get physical with strangers, you have no idea if they have a gun.
@Eddie How is that not natural selection? You mean to tell me that having a weapon isn’t natural? It’s 100% human nature to have/use weapons for self defense.
At least we agree this was a case of stupidity at its finest. I carry a gun everywhere I go, I don’t walk around like a sherif like Dreika did, I avoid all confrontation and never want to use it. Not my job to tell an asshole they parked in the wrong spot, it’s law enforcement’s job.... if Dreika truly felt that the driver should have been in some sort of trouble, he should have just called the police, he wouldn’t be in prison right now if that was the case.
@James Tomasino that's absolutely crazy, man. I kinda shocks me that you knew this man almost personally, and now you're here. It truly is a small world after all.
@dsch1znit The shooter was just that. He wasn't threatened and he didn't feel.his life was in danger. He thought he was the arbiter of who should park where. He isn't.
The truth is, had Drejka stopped when he fell down on the floor and called the cops, he probably would have won the "argument". But he decided to escalate and took out the gun 😕 that's when he screwed everything.
Not necessarily. He approached a woman in a car with her children and was taking pictures of her license plate and then starts yelling at her and coming up on the car while inside the store people are yelling that some guy is screaming at a woman. The husband sees it’s his family and pushes the crazy man away to protect them. He clearly is trying to get this guy away from them which you can see by the way he pushes him. Where does the piece of shit land? Back and to the right of the car where his family is.
@Melissa Coulter what was he protecting is family from exactly? Like this guy was super wrong to shoot him, but you shouldn’t just walk up and shove someone ether. The victim made a big mistake. Just like you never mess with road rage because you never know how mentally unstable the other driver is. You have no clue how crazy someone is, so you should show a lot more tact when dealing with people
Him carrying a weapon made him feel superior therefore he had no problem starting a confrontation. He knew he was protected and gave zero sh*ts about any one else's safety. I'm sure he walked around feeling like a god.
I’m 5 minutes in laughing at this man saying “nothings broken, just scraped up” and then making a makeshift sling outta his shirt. Man’s is desperate for sympathy
@Sabrason No. Just this particular person. As he said in his later statement, he is a wanna be ranger but daddy didn't allow him to be one so he seek satisfaction with effing with people in a convenient store parking lot. He was angry that he felt useless when he was pushed to the ground like a little girl so he cowardly took another man's life with his gun. Few firearm owners are like this and would certainly react differently.
Indian Noodle2021-06-09 22:16:25 (edited 2021-06-09 22:25:03 )
@Sabrason not a lot of people think about the adrenaline that’s pumping when you’re in a situation like that. I don’t think what he did was right, but I could see how it would be justified if the other dude walked closer and didn’t back up but could just be me. I think it should be draw the gun and train it on the attacker and make it clear you will shoot if they come any closer. Then again, adrenaline might mess with your senses.
@max yoinkage He was assaulted...you like that word better?? He had no way of knowing whether McG was armed or not in the split second he had to defend himself after being assaulted so he was correct in assuming that McG was armed and had further bad intentions. That's very reasonable and rational and is why many legal experts think it was justified use of the SYG law. You clowns using hindsight to incorrectly claim that Drejka had all this time to think and process information in slow motion only revealed by watching the video many times AFTER THE FACT are extremely ignorant and surely have never been in a life-threatening situation before.
@Indian Noodle McG took 2-3 steps towards Drejka AFTER the push, was high on MDMA and had a hx of assaulting a PO...only reason he didn't continue was b/c Drejka pulled a gun and fired. That bullet prevented a beating and possibly worse.
2 likes
Indian Noodle2021-06-10 01:37:10 (edited 2021-06-10 01:40:41 )
@Sabrason you have a point, but I think the gun would’ve been enough to scare him off. Nevertheless, it’s my opinion and not fact.
@Sabrason "the bullet prevented a beating"? The gun alone, if he just pointed it at McG, would prevent a beating. The bullet was unnecessary. It took a life; a husband; and a father from 3 kids
@Indian Noodle I know I have a point...it's the same point many legal experts have who agree that it was a justified SYG shooting. McG was high on MDMA and had a hx of assaulting a PO - were you aware of that?? He hiked up his pants and took 2-3 more steps TOWARDS Drejka AFTER THE PUSH making any reasonable person fear for their life so Drejka did what any reasonable/rational person would do in a high-adrenaline situation after being assaulted yet his response was remarkably calm and measured considering he only used one well-place shot on center mass. Amazing. Drejka didn't keep quiet and lawyer up immediately afterward and the Jury and Judge wanted to punish him for being a wannabe parking lot cop. That's the only reason he was convicted.
So he should hesitate and let the guy pull his own piece ? Should he let the man get in his vehicle where he probably has his own weapon ? What is your next step Dr Hindsight ? What would you have done in this high pressure incident ? You've been attacked, you’re on the ground, a big dude who may or may not want to kill you.... what do you do Matlock ? The only thing I can say is, even though I have military training and may not have handled it like this, the guy IS still alive and who knows what could have happened had he not fired.
Cant stand men like this ... a license and a few hours at the shooting range and they think they can do whatever they want confronting people like they're police
@Chuck Sheppard he should have just got in his illegally parked vehicle and driven off with the realisation that his nosey parker ways aren’t appreciated by all.
@Sabrason no, he didnt pull his gun then fire. He got shoved because he was yelling at a random mother w her kids (which he probably would’ve pulled his gun on, when you know his damn history), then he pulled his gun out, waited 2.5 seconds while mcg BACKED UP, then he shot him. He KNEW he was backing up, and he still shot. He was just waiting for a situation where he could shoot someone because he is a wannabe police officer /military officer.
@Chuck Sheppard he wasnt going toward his car, he was going toward the shop. I strongly believe that if the roles were reversed and the black man was shouting and swearing at a white mother with ther kids, and the white father came out to stop the situation which he then gets shot, y’all would be saying the black guy should get the death penalty.
@Indian Noodle You're all speaking in hindsight after watching the video 100 times. Real life doesn't happen like that. You have a split second to react in order to protect yourself and that's what Drejka did. He fired ONE well-placed shot AFTER being violently pushed to the ground with his attacker bearing down on him. Totally justifiable. Had he emptied the clip in him I would agree that it was excessive force but he didn't. Too bad for McGlockton that Drejka knew how to use his fire arm.
@Chuck Sheppard Exactly, thank you!! Drejka did the world a favor by taking out that POS drug addict McG even though that was not his intention. Hopefully McG's kids grow up learning not to lay hands on strangers like daddy did.
when i heard the details of the crime my heart broke for this poor woman and her family. she and her husband were just trying to have a nice time with their children. and this fuckin wanna-be cop decided to shoot her partner, the father of her children. and her poor son that was in the store with his father. i hope she and her family is able to find peace. this is heartbreaking, and michael is pure evil and stupid.
James Chua2020-09-14 01:34:40 (edited 2020-09-14 01:39:00 )
but that exactly the reason why he shoot. he was amateur and he feels threaten (weakling). so he shoot. you see feeling threatened is "subjective". it is measured by who you are and what you are capable of.
if you pushed hard on arnold schwarzenegger down the floor. he won't feel threaten at all he might come to you and break your neck. if you pushed hard on tom hidelston down the floor. he'll feel threaten for sure. and he'll stand up and say "I'm a god you dull creature" then get beaten to death.
You mean "Wannabe"s? If you don't already follow his escapades, you should check out Jeremy DeWitte. He is a strangely fascinating individual that is very entertaining.
@Bill Geo Oh boy, if you've never heard of Metro State Motor 1, you're in for a treat. He's taken YouTube by storm over the last several months. He's a Florida resident that owns(owned?) a funeral escort service company that he treated as his own personal police force. He wants to be police very, very badly but sadly his felony record & sex offender status will prevent that forever (thank goodness). The real FL police have been cracking down on his reckless behavior and police impersonations lately. The body cam footage from the police and from Jeremy himself (because he and all his men also have body cams for some reason) have been getting posted to YouTube and are all so very interesting. He's a crazy pathological liar who can't help himself. His stories are still be told because his court cases for his many, many crimes are still ongoing. I think around September of last year he was arrested for impersonating a police officer. When they took his body cam they looked at the footage and then pressed charges for the many offenses it showed. I think this video might be best one to get you started: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r1czLNKjpU (keep in mind that there is absolutely no reason for somebody providing a funeral escort to have a Kevlar vest, handcuffs, batons, pepper spray & fake handguns [air-soft pellet guns[)
JackDManheim that sounds like a video I saw recently. This guy was claiming to be part of RACES in part of it, which I could tell was bullshit right off the bat. It’s a ham radio emergency club and he didn’t even have a call sign. It’s not like that credential would have given him any of the privileges he was trying to use, anyway. Lol. Might be the same guy.
@Bill Geo Lol. Isn't it though? And absolutely an asshole supreme. It's so satisfying to see him get his comeuppance. I haven't seen that website before, thanx for the hookup.
@Bill Geo Actually, speaking of his court appearances, I should offer a trigger warning there: at one point he brings up his pregnant wife's multiple miscarriages to garner leniency from the judge. It's pretty gross. He will go to great lengths to paint himself as the victim.
@Mike Bircher The news doesn't talk about the cops that do their job well; ie 'The Majority'. They sell sensationalism. Learn to think for yourself, mate. Before it's too late.
Mike Bircher they’re more professional than that guy is, but I do see your point. Lol
5 likes
Mike Bircher2020-09-18 08:07:33 (edited 2020-09-18 08:09:40 )
@JackDManheim I'd suggest that same for you, sir. Particularly since you don't seem to live in the U.S. where police seem to think they're above the law. Either that or you have an unhealthy fetish with British comedians and the British way of life.
@Mike Bircher further evidence that you need to experience life in the real world: just because I called you "mate" does not make me British. Born & raised in California.
@JackDManheim Actually, it was your playlists that gave you away, but edgy kids will be edgy kids. When you get your driver's license and have your first experience with a police officer outside of OAN or FOX, we can chat. See you in 3 years.
@JackDManheim Yeah, I feel bad for them, but on the other hand there where a lot of clues that what they were doing was illegal. Your boss telling you "If the cops ask you about this, tell them this and that" for one! ;-)
@Brandon Sutton the dude is a trip. His trial for impersonating a police officer is supposed to start next month, meanwhile more & more footage of him acting a fool comes out everyday. He's crazy.
@Cracker Dan That's a good one. He's got an appearance on Dr. Phil coming up. I'm not sure how he was allowed to leave the state with multiple felony court cases coming up, but he did.
it should bother anyone that is normal. people don't talk like that.
4 likes
Ben Ali Chante2020-12-31 05:36:02 (edited 2020-12-31 05:37:09 )
Then that's probably one cocky pretentious professional. At the end of the day, it's all about the skills, not "pro" titles. (I mean in general, like a Baker, a basketball player or a photographer)
@Aurtisan Miner English is not at all my language but the concept of oxymoron is universal. Basically 2 opposite definitions used together. I guess we disagree on the fact that pretentious is the opposite of pro. To me, the only opposite for pro is amateur
@Tran That is indeed the correct term in force analysis. The fact that police officers aren't trained in a manner that uses the terminology according to the academia is strange, but I don't see an issue so long as they are trained in the basic concepts.
As one of those professionals i'd like to ask what made you think he was trying to be like us. Sounds like the dude likes guns and knew the lingo to try and defend yourself. I'm confused as to why everyone keeps saying he's trying to be military.
@JackDManheim Holy shit... I saw your comment about Jeremy DeWitte and I couldn't just leave well enough alone. I'm going on 4 hours of this ass hat's delusional antics and there are just no words. It's the most beautiful train wreck I never knew I wanted to see. Absolute insanity. I love it. Anyway I just wanted to let you know you have brought yet another soul over to "the DeWitte side". Lol and the idiocy is strong with this one. I am forever changed. And grateful. Thanks so much. Take care and stay safe.
@Vixen van Gogh Lol. You're quite welcome. This has gotta be one of the weirdest stories I've ever followed in real time. A psycho soap-opera. I don't know how far you are into the story at the moment but once Jeremy is released from jail after the 2021 DV arrest, the level of crazy kicks it up another notch; primarily by way of the content coming out of his own YouTube channel.
@Withheld You might be bringing some of your own baggage to the table. The original comment is about Drejka’s sad attempts at cop talk. Jim Can’t Swim has been around for a minute or two.
@Tran I mean you can understand what he’s saying I don’t see the reason why the officers say they don’t know what they mean genuinely. I think they just wanted him to explain for the record.
@James Chua Had he been a professional (a cop). He could just come up to some random dude's hotel room, point an AR15 on him, order him on the floor, bully him for a few minutes with orders to perform some weird dances, and finnaly shoot him multiple times for no reason. Also catch that all on tape. Charges dropped. Yes, this had really happened few years ago.
I love how he slowly comes to the realization that not only is he NOT a cop and not in the right in the eyes of the real cops, but he’s DEFINITELY going to jail😂😂
I really like the analysis provided by this channel. If anything it shows me not to say a word if ever questioned by police and wait for a lawyer. 5th amendment people! Also this dude was just looking for a reason to shoot someone
This man must want an incarceration term. There should be required intelligence quotient tests administered prior to approval for a weapon
3 likes
John Smith2022-03-02 00:54:32 (edited 2022-03-02 00:55:56 )
He could have avoided going to prison if he just used his 5th ammendment rights as he was going in for questioning. It doesn't matter if you think you're right or not, don't subject yourself to interrogation or an interview without a lawyer present.
He just blew his whole defense by incriminating himself. If the interview takes longer than 30 mins, ask for a lawyer and invoke the 5th.
The camera sealed his fate. At first, he lied claiming he ran at him and didn't retreat.
2 likes
John Smith2022-04-30 07:23:28 (edited 2022-04-30 07:23:40 )
@Looking 4 Things If he had said nothing, he would have stood a better chance in court. A good lawyer could take something possibly incriminating and spin it to help the defense. Instead he gave testimony that contradicted the video evidence, which like you said, sealed his fate.
A lawyer, would have told him to be quite. He would have, if he's smart (which this guy isn't). Then the lawyer could have said that he was blindsided, shoved to the ground, and feared for his life in that vulnerable position.
Arguing without contradicting the evidence would have given him a a better defense, but probably still would have had him seen prison. Although since he wasn't caught lying the sentence would have also been lower, and a deal might have been made.
It's part of why I swear by having some self defense skills if you are going to carry. You should be confident you can deal with an unarmed assailant to a reasonable degree.
@John Doe wait how is the black guy a coward? Somebody starts harassing his wife, so he steps up. Guy pulls out a gun, so he starts to walk away and is shot TRYING TO WALK AWAY. everything in this video makes it clear that the guy with the gun in this situation is a coward.
@John Doe wow not only are you a racist. You aren't even self aware of your racism. Now that's dumb. I see you missed my point. And avoided answering all of my other points. Suppose you should have came prepared to play this game.....
The white guy seemed very proficient and experienced with a gun. So could he not have shot the black guy in the leg, foot etc if any shooting had to be done? That would have neutralised the supposed danger without resulting in the black guys death. Its not like he'd never used a gun before and was just firing blindly in a panic, and just happened to hit the guy in a place that killed him.
Also, don't go around confronting people. If you don't like their behaviour eg parking in a disabled zone, then report them to the appropriate people. Don't just go winding other people up, then killing them when they respond back.
@John Doe Wow you certainly are seeing this incident from a totally racist point of view. The white guy was harassing the mother in the car. From her saying 'do I have to get my man?' the white guy could have reasonably guess that he was pushed down by her man. Why? Because he was protecting his wife and kids from a threat. That seems reasonable to me. Would the white guy have harassed the black man in his car if the situation had been that the woman went in the store and left her husband in the car? I'm guessing no. The white guy was fairly convicted of manslaughter IMO
@Anne MacLeod I understand what you're asking, but that's not a realistic thing. It's very Hollywood. And it's actually easier to kill someone with a leg wound(more vital arteries closer to the surface) than with center mass shots. People quite often don't stop an attack even after multiple gun shots. Most civilian and law enforcement training emphasizes center-mass body shots until the threat is stopped. Having said all that, this incident was nothing short of a murder. The shooter manufactured the situation to produce that horrific result. My heart goes out to the victim and his family.
Taylor Libby2019-10-09 11:39:30 (edited 2019-10-09 11:42:11 )
@Bob 1 Yeah, that's kind of a comforting stereotype for Brits to fall back upon when contemplating American culture. Betrays a total lack of understanding in the subject and a snide unwillingness to actually try and comprehend it. But I bet it makes all your friends nod sagely in agreement when you say it at teatime.
@Taylor Libby Thanks for clarifying that. I know absolutely nothing about guns. But yes I guess you're right. Even after being shot the adrenaline is still running high and the person could continue to attack. When I was young I was chased and hit by a car and it broke my leg. But I continued to run home on it and only felt the pain when I reached my house and safety. Yes I agree with you regarding the incident being murder.
@1onefix1 all i got from that was "poor me,poor us,we are the victims" White men are NOT the victims. Anti-white movement is not a thing,people are just tired of the bullshit and are finally calling them out. This guy gets out of his own car which was his choice,starts yelling at the wife with the kids,over a handicapped spot which was again his choice. And when the man saw him yelling at his wife and pushed him ,michael played the victim and shot him.Getting pushed doesnt earn a death warrent. Sorry bout it🙅
Contrary to popular belief, a man, black or white who has gone out to see who is shouting at his wife , who is being aggressive towards her and ...oh...carrying a gun...her partner shoved him - did not PUNCH him (which I suspect he well could have done and decked our white 'victim' ) - he was killed with the wanton disregard of an idiot with a gun. The footage shows the maximum aggression shown by the victim was a shove - not a punch - and backed off when he saw a gun - the sentence was correct and a father and partner lost his life.
@Vance Palizzi He is cruel and most probably a coward but the victim's actions were pretty cowardly too (leveraging his relative strength to 'win' the argument) and above all, stupid. In a situation like this you have to leave the antagonist an out - a way to retreat while retaining some pride. Otherwise if you get a coward/someone vicious/a narcissist etc then you are inviting something like this to happen.
@BiggestFoot Shoving a person backwards onto asphalt can kill them very easily. The video clip does not include audio, the black dude did not appear to try to de-escalate, he went just as cock-strong as the white dude, and up the pyramid they went. If the black dude survived the confrontation, you can bet your ass both of these men would be locked up.
@Bob 1 The the British navy orders a fresh batch of L85's. Who dies? "More guns less deaths" sounds a lot like you misconstruing someone else's statements and twisting them into your simpleton's worldview. "I don't need to comprehend stupidity because I'm not stupid." That's really funny, you know. Smart people have an easier time imitating stupidity than the stupid have imitating intelligence. A fool requires a wiser man to have fooled him.
@Sean Gilbertson and with your kids in the car hell yeah?! Thank you! I would want my man to get that random dude at my window away from me and my children too.
@Sean Gilbertson using a firearm was an unnecessary escalation. As was pushing the dude from behind. I think acting as if he did nothing wrong is the point of contention here. No he should not have been shot. Also they shouldnt have parked in a disabled parking place without a permit or start hitting someone for a verbal altercarion
@Sean Gilbertson Just as being shoved to the ground in this case doesn't justify deadly force a few choice words doesn't justify getting hands on with someone. If someone is going to go around body checking strangers then they should be prepared to face the potential consequences of escalating a verbal confrontation to a physical one. You don't know them, you don't know what they're capable of or what lengths they're willing to go to. It is the lesson that should be learned from this.
@Torchy Brown Pointless question... The question is essentially already answered in his initial comment, which is a resounding no he should not have been shot.
@Sean Gilbertson and that would be a very stupid thing to do, but whatever your preference is... (as you can see, this guy did exactly the opposite of protecting his family, he got shot in front of them bc he pushed some psycho)
@Sean Gilbertson there is a difference between victim blaming and not provoking. And please do not tell me that it is ok to change a heated argument into pushing bc it is not. Until the pushing nobody was threatened physically, they guy was not even invading the personal space of the woman.
@Rocky Waskahat Because attacking a guy way smaller and older than you is really brave right? Obviously shooting was excessive but the dead guy is not blameless. He'd still be alive if his reaction wasn't instant violence
True. Its like they don't have time to do any rational thinking; or PTSD where they CAN'T think rational. He should have minded his own business. Such a sad situation all around.
@1onefix1 well the one with the gun was actually the one that uncontrolled emotions, no impulse control and actually using trained strategies but changing them to fit his motives. The victim was unarmed. The guy with the gun was the starting aggessor as he started the confrontation. There is ways to say to people to not cause a confrontation. The guy with the gun actions was that to cause a confrontation. Why would anyone walk around a car that has a woman and children in then start yelling at her. He could have asked did you know your parked in a disabled spot. A polite way of informing the person, they might have forgot to put there badge on display or they might just simply not realise. I know this happens as im disabled and yes disabled parking does get abused but you can educate why these parking stops are needed for people with disabilities so they know for future
@Random Name the guy with the gun was the starting aggressor, he could have not got involved and report it to the shop. It's like he was out to create a confrontation as he saw it was a woman with kids. He could have done an interaction without the aggressive behaviour. The other guy came out walked up to him saw he wasn't stopping or leaving. Nobody knows what he said to the guy with the gun to try and de-escalate the situation prior to pushing him. But the guy with the gun should have walked away but he didn't, he also didn't care about the woman's personal space but did when it was his own. The only criminal was the guy that shot someone who WAS walking away.
A guy looking for a confrontation with a woman and her kids. Starts telling her about the rules of parking. What if she had been the one to come out of her car and then shoved him or hit him with the car door as she was stepping out?. What would his reaction be? Given his history of 4 attempts at pulling his weapon on 4 people, one being a young mother (similar to this case), i don't think we ever want to know that answer. He had 2.5 seconds to asses the situation. He already verbally stated how much distance/safety the other guy was between him. He states the guy was coming forward but as stated in court and in the interrogation backed up by CCTV, clearly shows he was already taking 3 steps back and headed towards the store. After 2.5 secs (which i would imagine is all he needed to steady his arm and pick the target area to fatally kill him.) he took the shot. His intent was to kill.
@Taylor Libby I gave you a thumbs-up on your comment Taylor but if you're asking, if I had a choice where I'd rather be shot center-mass wouldn't be the place. Seems to me all these shootings on TV that have resulted in fatalities have not been of the leg variety.
@mhern57 Have to disagree with you there- a leg shot will kill more easily than a torso shot, depending on placement of course. Wounds closer to the torso have a greater chance of hitting major arteries that are next to impossible to close up outside of an operating room. And the theory of "just winging them" to stop an attack has gotten a lot of people who believed in it killed.
@Taylor Libby Well Taylor I agree with you that a leg shot can be pretty devastating and life-threatening for sure. But I just Googled and I don't necessarily believe everything Google says but Google said a headshot is most fatal followed by, they called it a body shot. So that makes a leg or arm shot around third or so. So I I guess if you're out in the boonies somewhere and get hit in the leg pretty bad you could bleed out before help arrives but in the city if you can get someone to wrap a tourniquet and get you to the hospital you have a pretty good chance. But the idea that cops are trained to shoot center-mass until the threat has means a lot of these cops are shooting four five or six times whether it's justified or not. Survivability at that point is fairly nil. Shoot the hell out of my leg and I'll take my chances.
7 likes
Taylor Libby2019-10-20 18:37:30 (edited 2019-10-20 18:42:43 )
@mhern57 Of course a head shot is the most fatal. It's also the most difficult target to hit on a human for a bunch of practical reasons. That's obvious and, I assumed (so that's my fault), not part of the discussion we're having. As far as Googling this information goes, I agree with you about treating Google info with a grain of salt. It would be interesting to drill down on the information and find out exactly where those "body shots" happened. My suspicious is that a large percentage of those would actually be in the joints closer to the extremities, i.e.- shoulders and hips close to major arteries and blood vessels that are very difficult to tourniquet off in the field. I think you're underestimating just how quickly a person can bleed out from an extremity wound even in a major city close to a trauma center. People are both a lot more delicate and surprisingly resilient all at the same time. Sometimes people survive despite no realistic probability, sometimes they die from the equivalent of a papercut. About the specific tactics involved, well I'm not trying to be an ass about it but a threat isn't over until it's over. Maybe shot #1 wounds but doesn't stop/kill and the person is still moving forward. Same for shot #2. Shot #3 is the fatal one, but the person isn't down yet and is still coming but doesn't actually stop until shot #4, 5, or 6. And there are any number of other officers shooting also, so multiply the shots. It adds up quick. Not advocating this, just saying that I can see how it happens. Ask me where I'd prefer to get shot, my answer is still that I'd prefer not to. ; )
@Taylor Libby It's not oart of the conversation. You're the one talking about it. I asked Google which is more deadly a center mass shot or a leg shot. It didn't answer me. It said head 1st (duh right? It's so duh I'm surprised you'd waste your thumbs talking about it.) Then body 2nd. At that point I had to assume the leg or arm would be 3rd. I was just passing it along. Anyway, I saw your crazy long text and wasn't interested enough to read it. You've worn me out. You win, leg very bad.
the coward blindsided a guy and it turned out to have been a very dangerous thing for him to have done. you're right, just not in the way you think you are.
@Sean Gilbertson "victim blaming", "racist".. I see you have rehearsed the scriptures of the church of progressiveism very well: all opposing viewpoints can be dismissed as a form of hatred/discrimination. You check all the boxes, don't you?
I don't believe in good and evil but damn cowards cause so much damage it's terrifying. They'll do anything to not suffer for 1 second more than necessary.
Anne MacLeod this is my thinking. He was acting all entitled from the beginning. I don’t think it necessarily has to do with the race of the guy that was shot, but if it would have been another white dude he would have done the same thing. Of course, it doesn’t mean it wasn’t wrong. He should go to jail for what he did.
I know this crazy idiot that bad mouths me. I know I could smash him but his crazy mind will have him burn my house down and obsess on revenge. Yes, a terrified coward is truly dangerous. It's not worth all the skirmishes. It takes a brave man to walk away. Especially if you have a partner and kids. Well stated mate
When I was younger I would always come home with stitches. black eyes, and bruises from drinking and running the bar scene. My dad had a favorite saying he would regularly recite to me, he wouls say, "There are two things that aren't long for this world, a mean man and a fat hog". He meant that a mean man would scare someone enough to kill him. A scared, desperate person is unpredictable and very dangerous.
So basically your position is “my girlfriend gets to do whatever she wants and nobody gets to call her out on it, and if they do I’m going to hit them” lol sounds reasonable
Would he have approached them about the parking spot if he wasn’t armed? If you want to look at it that way, would the victim have pushed him to the ground if he knew he was armed? That kind of logic leads to a circular argument.
@fnp9 Melton What we learned is if you meet someone's aggression with higher aggression they can't overcome, instead of fleeing, they can murder you and scar your son for life, and some rando on the internet will think that, to some degree, that it's just "what you get". I get that you think they're both "idiots" but I think we should be able to come to a point and say where something ended is so unjustly removed from where it started that any conversation about the preceding wrong is petty at best.
@RealityCheck1993 I don't thinks it's ok, at all, that the guy was shot and killed. I do think, like most people, that it's unreasonable to park in a handicap spot, put hands on people for words, shot people who are not a threat. I only point out that after watching the video and how it played out, you would still put hands on him...learning nothing from what you just watched. But you feel the need to inject poor reading comprehension huh
It's not about cowardice. It's what is more likely to happen when someone is in a high-anxiety situation and hasn't had formal firearms training to know how to deal with that kind of situation. Even then, unless you've been in that situation, you don't know for certain how you will react until you're in it.
@Sean Gilbertson as we just saw in this video, shoving a stranger to the ground for arguing with your woman is just as much a stupid decision as the guy who pulled the trigger too quickly. It could be argued that assaulting someone was the stupider decision because that guy is dead. People need to stop letting their emotions dictate their actions and, instead, engage their brains.
@Vance Palizzi I believe the shooter really believed the other guy was going to continue attacking him. We have the benefit of seeing the surveillance video after the fact. It's easy to say we wouldn't have done the same thing, but you really don't know until you find yourself in that kind of situation.
@Bob 1 you are correct about one thing: you really don't understand the importance of bearing arms. It's best to remain silent about things you don't understand.
@Anne MacLeod aiming for an attacker's foot or leg is something that only happens in movies. Anyone with any training knows you always aim for the chest. You're also incorrect about "winding other people up, then killing them when they respond back"... the armed man wasn't involved in a confrontation with the other guy until the other guy suddenly shoved him to the ground for no logical reason.
@Bob 1 you don't know as much as you claim to. All of the types of shootings you mentioned are a tiny minority of shooting incidents. The fact is that 2/3 of gun deaths in the U.S. are suicide.
@Anne MacLeod A lot of people are calling the guy a coward for firing his weapon. Even though I believe he fired prematurely, the fact is that he did fire only a single shot. As soon as he saw the assailant was not threatening him anymore, he stopped. In highly intense situations, people often continue pulling the trigger, which is frequently necessary to stop an attacker, for the reasons you stated.
@Jill Kramer you seem to think that physical assault is a reasonable and logical action to take when two other people are arguing. You might want to rethink that.
@j9 Phoenix there is nothing called "maximum aggression," nor is there a legal difference between a shove and a punch. It's assault, either way. And it was a stupid move that he paid for with his life.
@David Ng correct. One never knows who they are messing with. The intelligent action is to de-escalate and remove oneself from the confrontation. Too many people have emotional reactions in tense situations instead of using their brain to act in a logical manner.
@Bob 1 gun violence in the U.S. has been dropping for a long time. When you make the correlation between New York banning guns and crime dropping in the state, you are not proving causation.
@Bob 1 you clearly have no understanding of the Second Amendment, and if you think the U.S. has a "bad gun problem," you are very misinformed. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid.
Eh nah, Lashing out is a last resort. While it's true cowards tend to jump to the last resort conclusion faster, They also lack the confidence to follow through.
@Guitar of Destiny the guy has a record for pulling guns on mothers in front of her children all you holier than thou types saying "thats what they get for resorting to violence" seem to forget the dude is dangerous and has a history of this dangerous behaviour
@Bob 1 why do you brits always think your soo much smarter for not having guns. The second amendment isnt primarily about fighting our government before it goes rogue its an agreement that says you trust in our abitly to handle guns the second you take that right away you are effectively saying "you are too dumb to think and act for yourselves so we will do it for you" and that is something no foreigner seems to understand Americans dont want to be beholden to an almighty government who you can't question or criticize and whom thinks for you that is why we defend the second ammendment so hard
@Bob 1 just because thats what you are more comfortable and used to seeing doesn't mean its better people who want to hurt other people will always find a way for example people in prison without access to real firearms still find ways/weapons to hurt people with
@Bob 1 and way to miss the point, it isn't entirely about the guns its about not allowing a federal government to encroach upon or God given and unalienable rights
@Bob 1 No fool god given implying everyone is born with them and not just because the founding fathers said so as in you are born with the innate right to defend yourself and speak your mind as all human beings should be and not because the government says you do
@Bob 1 One more thing the term is called god given rights because the founding fathers were trying to illustrate that they are not the people granting us these rights but these rights are the right of every man because they are God Given, they are innate rights.
@Bob 1 it makes sense in the context of forming a new country that wasnt supposed to be ran by an elite ruling class or monarch, when you consider the rights kings and old countries would take away/not give you, they use god as a way to appeal to everyone not to appear holier than thou, are you done pretending like you're smart yet?
@Bob 1 why are you so hung up on god Ive literally not said a word about him they used the term god given rights so that people like you in the future couldnt find a way to take them away from of us cuz we have plenty of people who think like you here in our own country
it doesn't matter how old something is if it applies in the modern day should everyone lose the freedom of speech just because sometimes some people say bad things? Should no one be allowed to have kitchen knives just because someone had murdered another person with one at some point in time
19 66 if though it’s fictional, tour comment makes me think of Arturo from Money Heist, dude was screwing up everything but, was a coward and still is but, he’s manipulative
@B S the "victim" had a history of starting shit and waving his gun around. The "victim" started shit with the woman in the car, yes the other guy escalated things by shoving him to the ground but if you watch the video who did not start wailing on him. The conflict was over but the "victim" out of malignant anger pulled out his gun and aimed. The other guy backs away as the "victim" takes a aimed shot. Can't say he was in fear of his life he threw that defense away in his interrogation also in the state of Florida if you pull a gun you better fire it immediately or else it's brandishing a firearm which I argue he did when he took aim
19 66 that’s only true in countries where dangerous cowards have access to guns. Over here people aren’t killed over parking spots. And, no, they don’t just use knives. And the homicide rates aren’t even comparable
Sean Gilbertson ya that worked great with prohibition! All that happened was the criminals still had access.. and guess what would happen with a gun ban? The same!!!
Jordan Peterson a famous psychologist says this alot, someone who is dangerous and knows how to control themselves is alot less dangerous then someone who is simply harmless, weak or cowardly.
A strong person will confront you and give you a chance to back down especially if they are moral, a weak person will wait until your back is turned.
@Guitar of Destiny Uh so like I agree that people shouldn't respond to words with senseless violence, but at least in this case he responded to physical contact with senseless violence.
if they’re at a significant advantage they’re extremely dangerous but if actually placed in a dangerous situation they would fold in every way possible
B S If the “victim of assault” was begging for it and harassing and verbally assaulting a woman and children then yes absolutely we will call that “victim” a coward all day long
karah storm The murderer was actually trespassing because he was banned from that store for harassing other customers and pulling guns on them..he had the cops called on him several times..he was an absolute menace to society
We've all seen them at school. They fear everyone and then build up an anger and try to lash out at people for no reason. This guy was just going out looking for trouble to show he's more powerful because of his weapon.
@Guitar of Destiny This is what happens when you pull the trigger on a man already backing away from you after you pulled a gun out on him. Micheal was completely justified in pulling his gun out, but there was zero excuse for actually shooting and fucking killing a man in front of his family.
@Bob 1lol yes irresponsible firearm handling/storage is the guns fault. Guns arent dangerous, idiots and criminals with guns are. And i personally think wed be doing infinitely more good focusing on stupidity and crime than guns.
SO true. I had an ex bf, whom I loved— BUT... he was a maaaajor puss/kinda had this cowardice? He looks really tough. He had tattoos, he would wear a lot of muscle tees and cargo shorts/baseball caps... But again.. he always carried his gun around! When we first started dating he thought I had a guy over, which I did not, however he came in my house with a gun! And made a comment like “oh I thought I was going to have to—“ and I’m like... “😳.......yeahhhh”
I was an inch taller than him at 5’8. I feel like shorter men have this cowardly way..much worse than others..only when they’re insecure about it. This guy actually reminded me of him.. not in look, but in the way he went about things. Way too quickly with no rationale. I do not believe he is innately evil. I just think this guy made really bad decisions, when carrying.
Spoken like someone who has never had to take a life. I spent 8 years in the Army and was deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan. You may think that it is a cowardly thing to do to shoot someone, but it is the opposite, it takes a lot of courage to be willing to pull that trigger. I cant tell you how many friends I saw get killed because they didn't have the courage to actually pull the trigger. I don't think that Drejka was justified in shooting McGlockton, but I also believe that Drejka believed that his life was in danger. When your body is being pumped full of adrenaline your mind is clouded and you don't recognize things that you normally would, this is called "the fog of war," and because of this the brain can easily perceive a step back as a step forward.
@Vance Palizzi You are right, the shooter did the wrong thing, but like I said in my reply to the original comenter, an adrenaline surge that you are not used to experiencing can easily cause the brain to misinterpret things like McGlockton stepping back as him stepping forward.
@Anne MacLeod Shooting someone in the leg is not always a good option. The vast majority of modern bullets (with the exception of hollow points) are designed to ricochet around inside the body and take you out of the fight. So let's say that Drejka had shot McGlockton in the leg. If Drejka shot McGlockton in the upper leg, the bullet could have EASILY struck McGlockton's femoral artery and McGlockton would have bleed out. If Drejka had shot McGlockton in the foot the bullet most likely would have ricocheted up his leg and into his knee and completely destroyed it.
19 66 29:17 I couldn’t see this argument actually working out in court. It’s clear he was simply shook up, scared and cowardly reacted with his trigger. As the defense, wouldn’t they just say he’s answering these questions based on his current emotional state? He’s no longer in “danger” of getting beat up, and can easily analyze a justifiable reaction in that situation. His rational thoughts after being taken out of the situation vs his reaction in the situation don’t align, because they’re two different mechanisms
Very well said. Another important fact is when someone says, “I am not afraid of you” That’s an indication that all is not good. This guy was complaining that his right arm hurt, got a bandage, but after 15:25 he’s moving his arm without pain. The problem here is he thought that since he goes to this store so often, he has the right to enforce order. He got pushed for probably disrespecting Bro’s lady, and because he felt disrespected pulled his gun and fired, without mentioning a word or warning. I personally believe that if someone pulls a gun on me and I don’t have one, I would hesitate and observe my situation. This is plain rage and he should go to jail. Fact is you should pick your own fights. To think of shooting someone over a parking place, or anything that you don’t own, and possibly killing them or wounding them, possibly gone to jail for murder, is plain STUPID!! But then again with the gun laws and the hate in America, it should be expected.
Guitar of Destiny yeah your right but jail is what happens to a man that uses a gun in irrationally. They found out her was riding around threatening people in traffic. Just saying.
A coward with a gun is one of the most dangerous people. I’m a 5ft tall white girl, my friend almost shot me unlocking and going in to MY house because he was startled. Fear is dangerous.
@j9 Phoenix He pushed him hard from behind and the man fell onto concrete. People have died hitting their heads on the ground from a push. Keep your hands to yourself.
LMAO. Your profile pic trolled me....I literally took my mouse arrow and went over it multiple times :). Im just imagining the amount of others that have done this.
@Jormangandur83 Deductive reasoning by authority...justifying ones mistake by coming up with a label/name for the "others" actions to justify horrible behavior with your behavior...aka the process of killing actual authority, and advocating for tyranny...piece by piece. It has to start somewhere...oh, is this the responsibility of authority...to keep yourself in check? Hmmm.
Only in a country which gives sells firearms like selling candy to kids. Guns are banned in the UK this crime would never of happened if it wasn't for the US horrificly lax gun laws
@Zeno's Grasshopper lol "acting out of emotion" while you defend a guy who had 4 previous counts of threatening with a firearm and got out of his car to yell at a woman and her kids over a parking spot...😆
@Zeno's Grasshopper you defend the murderer by saying "you never know what you would do in that situation" but scold the victim for acting out of anger after seeing a random dude step out of his car to yell at his wife. Nothing but wind whistling between your ears.
@Taylor Libby What's this weird defensiveness over guns? This video is literally an example of what they can, and frequently are, used for by the morons who are permitted to carry them.
@S. A. The guy was only backing away with a gun in his hand. That's clearly indicative of non-agression. These people were actively attempting Kyle's life, but because the guy with a glock was backing up for a uninterrupted sight picture outside of arms length, he surrendered, even though he was brandishing a gun the whole time.
@Bob 1 The people who came up with evolution say in their own works that they intend to use it as a weapon against Christian society. Far before any data was on the table (as if you can prove the unfalsifiable reductios of evolution with data, lol) and to this day, they believe in the greek creation myth, and will perform every mental gymnastic and every manipulation of the institutions they control to keep up their pathetic farce. Information Science has debunked evolution. Period. Just assuming that magic lightning made DNA happen isn't science.
@Bob 1 You don't know what god given aka natural rights are. "Who decides" means you don't know. Determining these things is a simple logical process. You have to kill me, or physically maim me to prevent me from exercising my rights. The very fact that such actions remove somebody else's rights means it's isn't one's right to murder someone. It's not because a law was written that I have rights. The law protects and recognizes the universally applicable and and absolute truth of natural rights. Universal and absolute truth is what determines what does and does not originate in the mind of God, and through logic, we share in it.
@S. A. I got your post confused with something actually relevant. "Just stop fighting in the middle of an adrenaline rush, man." You got some sorry ass expectations. It's called fight or flight for a reason. Not everyone is so mentally disciplined.
@S. A. Why should someone be allowed to illegally park in a handicapped spot without expecting old people to scream at them? What did they think was gonna happen?
@S. A. He might have done so, but was that information included in this video? You could just provide a few facts and some analysis, but instead you want to morally admonish year-old comments that you already know don't have all the facts.
@Lewis H "Weird defensiveness"🙄🙄 What's with the gaslighting and trying to restart a discussion you weren't part of near on a year after the fact? Everyone knows that lonely trolls need attention too I guess.
@Emmanuel Prikas Weak and impulsive, no thought to consequences. When you pull a gun, your opponent will no longer be a threat. There was no need to shoot to kill.
@Keyboard Warrior it doesn't matter whether confrontations are legal or not, the point is, he instigated a fight and murdered somebody over a parking spot.
@19 66 I know the word war sounds oh so big and scary to you, but that concept is in play whenever someone is under the influence of adrenaline, as was just painstakingly explained to you.
@Mathias B If the guy hadn't pushed him, no combat would have been initiated. Up until that point, nothing that happened was against the law, outside of parking in a handicapped spot.
@Keyboard Warrior did you look into your crystal ball and saw that if the guy hadn't pushed, "no combat would have been initiated"? Maybe you could look in there and find yourself a brain.
@Keyboard Warrior I've known immigrants with a 3rd grade education who can string together a better, more coherent argument than this. You're making a joke out of yourself.
@Keyboard Warrior True, but we aren't talking about legality. We are talking about initiation. Number one, All because the guy was within his legal rights to berate and tell off the driver doesn't make it right. Number 2, because he CHOSE to berate and tell off the driver in the way he did he got pushed. Thus, because he chose to be an asshole and do what he did he began the domino effect that led to him murdering somebody. This isn't a subjective argument. Its 100% objective. He decided to park illegally, get out of the car, and berate someone for parking illegally. Lmao.
@Mathias B Initiating a verbal conflict and initiating combat are two different things, regardless of the law, unless you don't think people should be expected to have self control.
He is literally a predator that succeeds by his victim's lack of self-control. His ASSAILANT CHOSE to push him, that's what led to the murder. No combat = no murder. If this stuff is so objective and you're so confident, what is systems analysis and how do metaphysics apply to this discussion? Since you wanna talk about a first cause.
@Mathias B Whether or not you think he invited it doesn't matter, that's subjective. Specifically, it is subject to how one views rationality, which is, to an extent, a matter of opinion. Attacking an old man because he's yelling at your wife, and not even caring whether or not you're setting yourself up to win the fight itself, much less avoid jail time (If this fight didn't result in a gun being pulled, the guy who died would have gotten charges, fyi.) isn't exactly rational. That's my opinion.
@Mathias B The incident was initiated when the first couple entered the parking lot. The man didn't get shoved for exercising his right to be an asshole, he got shoved because the person who shoved him chose to do so. Throughout this discussion we've had to break this one incident down into stages of 1, the people entering the scene, 2, the initiation of verbal conflict, 3 the initiation of physical combat. This assumes that these are separate sub-incidences subsisting within a greater general incidence, which is why you yourself had to refer to it as a SEQUENCE of EVENTS. Whether or not you think circumstances permitted that he be pushed, or that he deserved it is irrelevant, This "sequence of events" would have left no one dead if everybody kept their hands to themselves. Your assertion that the initiation of a verbal altercation was the first cause of events that lead to death of a person is wrong, flat on its face. In no circumstances can that be correct. People don't die from verbal altercations. Other things had to happen that are dependent upon the choices people freely make. The only way you die from a hand-to-hand fight, that escalates to guns, is if COMBAT is initiated, not mean words. You are mathematically, strategically, ethically, logically, wrong.
@S. A. Well since you entered the thread with the greater preponderance of evidence, knowing that Drejka gamified the situation in order to try getting away with murder, how is he going to do that attacking first in close quarters, exactly?
@S. A. You've put yourself in a position where you have to argue that if the deceased didn't attack first, Drejka would have. Meanwhile the evidence you have available directly disputes that. It's not a defensible position.
You are a coward and that animal who when he saw the gun regretted for a few seconds and run inside the store. I hope the same happens to you because these animals do not discriminate between whites. You can be from Iceland and still an oppressor in their eyes. An ignorant lowlife scumbag with nothing to lose is actually very dangerous, especially when you don't defend yourself.
@mac diggity he didn't stutter. A terrified coward will always be harmful to those around them. A coward will not try to help but just think of themselves. Wouldn't they?
People who carry weapons tend to be looking for truble. Even when they clame that they only do it for "self defense" whitch is a lie. You carry weapong to GET in to trubble. By not carrying them, you'll do everything possible to avoid it in the first place.
Do what ever on your property, but keep your weapons at home.
Especially in a country where guns and accessories are widely available and accessible. Never know what wanna-be Marine nutjob is packing heat with an itchy trigger finger who also thinks he's the town sheriff.
@1966 only if hes in a country where hes legally aloud to carry a gun ?!!! If I give you a cell phone? Do you think you are more or less likely to make a phone call? Guns dont kill people, People Do
@sammy Words don't hold power action does! Words can be said but without a movement or affirmative action words are just words in the end. However they sure can bring some love and hate.
@Sean Gilbertson you are calling others cowardly while you pull out the race card and claim you are joking when you face confrontation about your flawed worldview. How brave you are
@Sean Gilbertson banning guns won't solve the problem. all that'll do is put more people in prison. if a criminal wants to get a gun illegally; they will. especially in this country. the United States is already too far down the gun rabbit hole to climb out now.
2 likes
Kay Wright2021-03-07 15:28:50 (edited 2021-03-07 15:42:02 )
@Anne MacLeod Your comment leads me to believe you don't shoot guns. You're taught to aim for center mass when firing. Shooting at limbs leads to missed shots on attackers and stray bullets.
Edit - Sorry missed your dialogue with Libby.
She is also correct about the leg shot opposed to body shot if she meant the pelvic shot. If you get the femoral artery in the groin it's over.
@Sean Gilbertson You are right, people shouldn't correct other peoples behavior otherwise the person will yell at them and their low iq thug partner will shove them to the ground. Fantastic logic.
@fnp9 Melton "Idiot". Coward. Or Evil man. Evil is a strong word, but my definition of it includes: knowingly and willingly harming an innocent human for no reason that would be considered reasonable by any normal person, and deriving a satisfaction, or aiming to derive satisfaction, from this.
@Cross Terminal down here, in the bellows of the comments, I'm going to help you.).. you are correct, of course, but on paper only. In the real world stupid or evil - its the end result that holds the most weight. Stupid and evil are two roads to the same house. At the very least, conduct yourself accordingly.
@fnp9 Melton Tl;Dr version of my comment: An evil person is fully aware and intelligent about their evil actions. An idiot is not. That's the destinction.
Hm. Idk. I myself have committed to what I describe as evil actions. Those times the evil person knows full well the situation they're in, and exactly how their actions will directly influence those around them and the innocent in negative ways that far exceed the positive consequences. The evil person, or at least me, gets a kick out of how unjust the action of harming an innocent unjustly is. The fact that the person didn't deserve my crime and that I knew I was aware of that was what made me want to show it to the world and rejoice in it. A stupid person does bad things because they're emotional or doesn't know better. Neither of those are particularly evil. The only exception of course is if what I previously described as evil is the emotional motivator for the idiot. But even then, such cunning requires... cunning, which is a trait with "smart" in its definition.
@fnp9 Melton I don't know. The victim can get confused if the attacker is just pure evil. "Why would anyone stab me like that? He didn't have any reason to." It can take longer for them to process it
I almost feel bad for the guy. He's been taught that this is all right, and he actually feels justified in shooting an unarmed man and putting himself in the position to do so. I have a gun, so I'm in the right, don't challenge me.
Meh. If it were a random conversation that would be one thing but he knows his future is on the line here. I'd put up with a little temporary pain to express myself as clearly as possible in that situation, wouldn't you?
@Cricket talk and chat surprising because camera clearly shows he was assaulted from the back and physically kicked to the concrete. He could had easily died there if he hit his head, but survival instincts kicked in and he was not only able to land on his hand but to answer to the attacker, albeit in wrong way, for which he is receiving a fair sentence.
@draqon ofwhitestars the only thing hurt was his ego. And he disturbed there peace instead of minding his own business he was to busy being the parking officer. He should be minding his own business was he clearly thinks he is the stores own parking inspector. Yes the poor dead guy over reacted to . But he didn’t deserve that.
@draqon ofwhitestars there was never a kick he pushed him. And he obviously didn’t mean him to fall on the ground . You obviously don’t know the difference between a push and a kick. He didn’t hit him in any way shape or form. Or he could of hurt him much worse if that was his intention
@Cricket talk and chat didnt mean him to fall on the ground? Oh i guess some dude coming from behind you and striking you down on concrete is totally fine.
@Cricket talk and chat WRONG. If the guy who was assaulted on the back didnt fall on his right hand, but fell on his head on concrete, the assailant would be the one serving 20 years in prison. Attacking someone from behind and assaulting them to the ground is not OK, it is physicall assault and the guy who fell has every right to defend himself. Unfortunately for the defender, he chose wrong method to do it and will serve the punishment to full extent.
@draqon ofwhitestars what part am I wrong about the part that if he didn’t have a gun on him they would of both gone home safely but him with a bruised ego . I’m sure the guy that actually died had made his statement. Shove off. He wasn’t looking for trouble trouble came to him. !
@Cricket talk and chat Come on. That push was aggressive and he landed hard on asphalt. Yes, he should've minded his own business, but had he not been blindsided and pushed to the ground, none of this would've happened.
@Cricket talk and chat You are wrong on the part that it is OK for anyone to physically assault a person and throw them down the ground. That is not ego, that is deliberate physical harm being done to another human being and that gives right to defend.
@draqon ofwhitestars the guy was trying to run away he backed off. The poor black guy was innocent. The only thing he did wrong was protect his family . He was like wtf going on here. And he over reacted. How was he to know he was going to get killed because of a small shove
@Cricket talk and chat this isnt about black guy vs white guy. This is about being physically attacked and slammed on ground deal. Both men overreacted, both men were punished for it, neither is good.
@Anonym saying one thing and another person shoving words in my mouth i never said do not equal. Shoving someone from the back down the ground with intent of physical harm is NOT OK and the guy had every right to defend himself, was a bullet shot the right way to respond? NO NOT OK. The problem I have here is that people are defending the guy who shoved response as adequate...IT IS NOT.
@Anonym and if you cant understand that a person has a right to fight back for his life if his life is threatened with physical assault, than thats bad. No not by shooting obviously.
@Cricket talk and chat People from different backgrounds live under different codes of acceptable conduct. That's why when you meet a complete stranger in a place you aren't familiar with, you should presume that you don't know the way he or she will react. From a common sense stand point you should be weary of strangers and try to be peaceful if possible.
@Josh G that would be none.! I wouldn’t ever do that I’d try a different approach I’d say mind your own business. ! Stop playing parking ticketman when your not.!
@Anne Hedonia the mother and kids were blindsided when they tried to have a calm day, but no, a random white man with a gun (which, if he had gotten it properly, he would’ve had reason to fear his life. People who bear firearms know to always AVOID ALL CONFLICTS, NOT COME LOOKING FOR THEM, which is exactly what michael did.) thought he was a police officer, and decided to shout and take pictures of a random mother w her child.
@draqon ofwhitestars except, this really just boils down to race. I bet you all my money that if the mother was a white woman w her white kid, this situation would’ve NEVER HAPPPENED.
@draqon ofwhitestars but marquice didnt have the intent of physical harm, he had the intent to get a man who was threatening his wife and kids AWAY from his family.
imagine if he did get away with this. he would still be a total loser. 'oh, yeah. i shot a guy because he pushed me. and he pushed me because i was yelling at his wife, over a parking space. yeah, i didn't fear for my life. why are you walking away?'
Exactly. He's so unbelievably pathetic and sad. This was the best thing he had to do with his time after retiring young and inheriting a bunch of money.
Not enough people are taught that the only reason a weapon comes out in a situation like that is for shooting. The second it's out the situation escalates to life-and-death for everyone involved regardless of the state before that moment. Fight or flight is a thing but you can't truly flee from a weapon pointed at you, you must be allowed to flee. So if you take it out you must have made the decision and been willing to kill. Any hesitation means you could die. Whether you're the only one with a gun or you're matching someone else's gun.
This guy was just a coward picking pathetic fights and the first time he gets put in his place his reaction is 'I'm gonna kill you'. He pulled out prematurely, saw he didn't need to shoot, and shot anyway. The hard shove was uncalled for. But going straight to nuclear in completely silence was beyond uncalled for. Glad this guy got locked up a long time. You can slightly make a case for being blinded by pain and fear here but you can't at all say he wasn't looking for trouble with the comfort of knowing he's armed.
8 likes
Replies (4)
Nikolay Antipin2022-04-18 21:51:41 (edited 2022-04-18 21:52:15 )
What are you trying to say? That he shouldn't pull the gun? Or that as he pulled the gun, now he can start kill everyone around? No matter pulled or not, you have to keep evaluation situation and only fire it when it's absolutely necessary, not just because you escalated situation by pulling it out.
@Nikolay Antipin It's not a laser pointer. It's not a warning tool or deterrent. I'm not saying you can't stop and put it away. I'm saying the only reason you should be taking it out is because you're past the point where you'd be stopping. If some bystander saw him on the ground pointing his gun at the guy and then pulled theirs and shot him, they'd be acting in an okay manner.
You evaluate things and determine you're going to have to shoot. That's the only time when you bring it out and shoot. Yes some situations would be a little different. The guy in this case simply did the complete opposite of what should have been done.
@Nocare I agree on most of it, but not on statement that "it is not a deterrent". It certainly is in many cases, you just don't know upfront will it work as deterrent (95% of times) or will escalate it even more (5%). But if it is clearly working as deterrent after you pulled it out - you should NOT fire it.
I agree he should not even pull it out. But also even after he did he should not have fired it as it clearly worked as deterrent and there was no risk to his life from a guy he killed.
Can I just say I love how in response to the cop saying he believes that drawing your gun after being knocked down is a matter of opinion, this guy who ISN'T a cop tells him "Well that's not true, that's in your training, so..."
While I'm not saying he shouldn't shut up and ask for a lawyer, I think it's safe to say even the best lawyer wouldn't be able to dig him out. He was literally caught on video initiating a conflict and once he was shoved, he pulled out a gun and fired on a man who was backing up after seeing the gun.
It's just so happens these people were caught doing some criminal activity. You know, commiting crime by itself is usually not the brightest thing to do.
Ikr like so many people would be free if they just STFU. My dad was a lawyer and he often won the ones where the dude said lawyer. He also hated police body cams. They invalidated any police brutality claims and also recommend the shooters face when cops where attacked.
@Chloe Marlowe My dad was a lawyer and probably could have gotten him a great plea deal if he wouldn't have talked. Lots of clearly guilty people get good plea deals because they STFU instead of confessing.
I had noticed on those to catch a preditor interrogation videos the ones that asked for a lawyer got 7 years plea bargain the people that sang like a canary got 14 years plea bargain. Which shows under any criminal accusation you can half your sentence by keeping your mouth shut
He was a time bomb 4 times he has pulled his weapon on people I carry all the time and have been hit even wearing my gun but I knew The person didn’t intend to kill me or really cause great bodily harm I’ve never hid behind my weapon and you must have the ability to Mentally see though a situation because you shoot to kill not wound Your first thaught shouldn’t be your weapon that’s why you train and be able To react in 10ths of seconds
Miss Informed2022-06-17 17:57:26 (edited 2022-06-17 18:19:34 )
23:22 I have never been in that situation before... well maybe you shouldn’t be carrying a gun with intent to use it for self protection if you never properly trained when not to use it. This is when carrying for protection becomes a danger for everyone else. If you are willing to walk around with a gun, you must be willing to take responsibility, in whatever form it comes. He wasn’t prepared for that.
Yeah, like who made him the parking police? Unless youre disabled and needed the parking bay yourself, its no ones business who has a placard or not. I have a placard and never use the disabled bays. Seems the other bays were closer than the disabled one anyway.
@blue ears There were so many spaces available, she was sitting in the car with the kids, he just ran in for a sec, and then gets murdered over this. Above and beyond sad and unbelievable but a highlight of what goes on here in America
So many people in the comments making excuses for people who are parking in spaces that are DESIGNATED HANDICAP ONLY. Meaning people who take those spots who aren't disabled, nor have they even gamed their way into getting a disabled placard at very least, they're just blatantly parking in a spot designated for someone with actual physical disabilities that prevent them from being able to move quickly or efficiently and without a ton of effort. That's a selfish, narcissistic, uncaring asshole move, regardless of how short a time they were gonna be in there or whether their kids were with them or whether parking spots were open all around them - which just makes them look even worse and like even bigger arrogant, ignorant jackasses for deliberately taking a handicap spot when you're surrounded by close, unmarked spots yet you choose to take the spot that a handicapped person might need. And to do this in front of their kids is disgusting and teaching them awful, disrespectful behavior.
None of the excuses are anything more than just excuses. Excuses being made for really shitty, ugly behavior. And no, they didn't deserve to experience violence like that, especially in front of their kids, but they also shouldn't be absolved of their assholish behavior. Stop being inconsiderate pricks and you'll have a much less likelihood of ending up in a confrontation with one. You simply can't deny that this confrontation never happens if they didn't arrogantly take the parking spot of someone who actually needs it. Don't give maniacs like Drejka a reason to direct their ire and frustration with life at you.
@Lilac Rain Indeed. He's self-righteously making people miserable in the name of some stupid, irrelevant cause nobody asked him to get involved in. On an abstract level that fits the SJW descriptor pretty damn well.
"...It is not my problem that I also parked illegally, but it was all for the mission. i am not at fault for my actions because I was simply helping the society"
Even though he made his own parking space. In Oregon, if you have small children, you can get a Handicap Plaque, to make it safer for the family. What a shame.
This says it all.... the same type of people protecting parking spots are the same type of people who would walk by if somebody was getting raped right in front of them, as long as it's not a white person they don't care....I wonder if it was a white person in the car if he'd go robocop on them?
@Zach D I have fish foot, totally paralyzed, I DONT CARE AS MUCH ABOUT IT AS YOU OR HE DOES! its obnoxious but they'll get caught BY POLICE WHO CAN FINE & CHARGE THEM not CITIZENS POSITION to POLICE NON VIOLENT ISSUES like speeding or parking, etc. People need to mind their business unless its violent.....
@Zach D it's not up to some random guy to check that though. Imagine if one of them WAS disabled and they had a guy interview them on it who was ready to KILL if they weren't. Nobody was saying that it's okay to park in disabled parking spaces but it's not that deep
@Zach D I mean, everyone was still in the car but the dad. I'm sure if a handicapped person were to pull up they would just move. The family was only there for a second anyway to buy snacks.
They would have inconvenienced someone for, at best, 2 minutes. That and there were plenty of other spaces around anyway so what's it matter?
Also, we should kill people for parking in a handicap spot for 2 minutes while you run into the store? Wut.
i surveilled the situation, assessed the perimeter and any unfriendlies I then proceeded to field strip my cigarette and put on my thousand yard stare face and moved ahead with the mission at hand.I also pee'd a little bit.
@blue ears it is prohibited to use that parking space, If you see someone violating this, there is nothing wrong with pointing it out in a civil way. I really wonder why do some people need to be on one extreme on another? Haha
Had a date that talked to a driver who parked in handicapped spot to protect his Porsche & driver assaulted my date. Later I found that his mom is disabled & now I am so I am proud he stood up for these parking spots. At that time I was as puzzled as many as these comments r! Hope y'all don't know how important these parking spots r!
@Phyllis Irwin I think everyone knows but also realize there was no one in the parking lot, they had a car full of kids, he just ran in to grab something so I don't think his life should have been taken in front of his wife and kid over a parking spot. Geeze
@Zach D You're really playing this up like spending 2 minutes in a handicap spot in a mostly empty parking lot can tell you enough about someone's character that you can then assume they kill puppies or something in their spare time.
@Zach D thank you , also why does the victim have to come out and push the guy so hard ? I mean he also could have acted correctly and contacted the police and everything that everyone is saying that the suspect should have done , the victim could have done all those things , but they were parked illegally like a bunch of assholes and knew if they called the cops they would get a ticket , so instead violently shoves a guy that could have caused serious injury , because of that this whole thing spiraled out of control , period , everyone take responsibility for their own actions , period .
Anyone else catch during the interview when he tells him the family has been very descriptive about him as a person his facial expression and he mumbles "Oh, I've heard" ? The WAY he says it gives you a pretty good insight as to what type of person he actually is
Well he had all the terms down pat even ones they didn't know "neutralize the threat" "21 feet rule" "force multipliers"? He figured the officers would relate to him like he is one of them
This guy made me laugh so hard clutching at his arm saying how badly it was hurt and he could not move it. However it worked just fine when he drew his a gun took aim and fired.
@lol dunked on it actually does seem like he’s condoning the shooting for multiple reasons. One, the man’s name was not Tyrone and this person knew that. He used a racially stereotypical name to try and describe the actions of the deceased. The only people who use racially stereotypically names when describing the wrongful death of someone is someone who has some sort of prejudice. It’s already a stereotype that black men are violent so let’s not be obtuse. Joking about the murderer is perfectly fine because his actions were unjustified. It was not self defence. It was a reaction of anger. He was looking for a fight from the start when he started harassing this woman over a parking spot. Michael is the type of man to scream at a woman with children over the Mom trying a 2 grapes before picking which bag to use. He’s got anger issues. Markeis has just walked up to a man who was yelling at his wife, and pushed him. Was that a response of anger? Absolutely, but most men in these comments are saying they’d do the same. Are most men just angry little men who have no self control? Or do most men, like most women, feel protective over their loved ones.
I can’t say whether Holliday is racist, but I can say using the nickname Tyrone to perpetuate the violent black man stereotype desensitises the fact that a man was KILLED. He was not a threat to Michael.
@Arek Pushing someone to the ground over a strictly verbal altercation is also uncalled for. Just saying. Anyone who says they would have done the same thing does in fact lack some degree of self control. Not excusing trigger happy’s actions, but an immediate violent response to a verbal dispute is absolutely 100% uncalled for and unnecessary.
@HLLDY I hope you’re not married and if so I hope your wife never reads your comment knowing that if a man ever starts yelling at her with your small children with you nearby you’ll stand there and do nothing.
Imagine being a grown man who argued with a woman in front of her small kids and then getting pushed by her husband who was unarmed and standing there and defending yourself with your hands they way it was intended instead of blowing the other guy away because you happen to be armed and too afraid to fight him like a man.
These kinds of people are also the kinds that do become bad cops. I stand behind law enforcement %100 but people like this seek out positions of power.
@Jeremy Casey junior reserve officers training corps. Used in high schools to teach kids leadership and help them prepare if they decide to join the actual military
I was in JROTC, and no one EVER did that in my school. I mean, we'd salute ourselves....for practice. XD I'd be too embarrassed to go area making my fellow students salute me because of my uniform. Surprised he didn't get stuffed in a locker or teased relentlessly.
@Bubba master how does saying 'obliterating' shows your bias. Might be a strange choice of word, but shows his bias? Please educate me on your dumb logic. The op says nothing racial, yet you're the one who brought it all up. Idc about trump or biden or bla bla as i'm not from the USA (the only country you know). I pity you actually, go buy a map and see that there are more countries out there aside from USA so that could maybe stop you from bringing american politics to a random person on youtube who literaly never mention anything to give themselves away that they're american.
@Bubba master or because the dude shot someone for no justifiable reason. The dude thinks it was his due diligence. This guy is literally animated in the fact that he does believe he is in the right , which shows how diluted his sense of the situation is. This dude only built a stronger case against himself, and on top of that he thinks the investigator / interrogator is on his side.
Yep That prosecutor explained it very concisely and put the jury into the moment expertly. If you're the family member of a victim, he's the man you want in that courtroom, and he's the man you dread if you committed a crime and enter that courtroom.
@Big D I did the law aspect of the ciminal justice system. When I was started law school and even before that I did not want to be a cop/investigator so dont worry you wont see me in the interrogation room interrogating these people.
0 likes
Big D2022-02-17 21:00:38 (edited 2022-02-17 21:02:58 )
@Bubba master oh no i dont expect you to be the interrogating one 😂
I literally thought the prosecutor did a trash job, and i was like thank god he behind bars... but ofc opinions is subjective, and i thought he refuted a bit, but most of his arguement was just waffling about nothing :/
@:I racist "hillbilly" though? Sounds kinda bigoted. Are you saying all southerners are racist or hillbillies or both? As f'd up as Bubba's comment was, it seems like it was factually acurate
I know so many guys like him. Mr. "I gotta gun so no one can ever kick my ass and I can do and say whatever I want to people". They talk tough because they have a gun, but in a fight they are worthless.
Have never watch an hour long on YouTube but watch 3-4 vids of an hour long from this channel I’m so interested and entertained the narrator did good job narrating and there’s no music on the background plus he is so detailed.
Holly shit. This is so true. I hate the back voice over anything but still loving this channel no matter what. "Like and subscribe peeps!" Keep it going (:
it drives me insane to people compare everything to netflix, or insist something be put on netflix. you must be paid to do astroturfed advertising for them. netflix is trash. all video content doesn’t have to be on that garbage streaming service.
@conzmoleman I just meant it’s really well done and high quality like it has some big backing. It’s a encouragement that the content is good not that it should be on that platform..
Whether you're in the wrong or not, always ask for a damn lawyer. You talk to the cops by yourself you're doing time even if you're innocent. Ask for a god damn lawyer you are not smarter than the law
The only thing I agree with in the video is that he could pull his fire arm when getting sneaked by this dude BUT if I was in his situation I would pull it and let him know to get away from me without aiming it at him. Because once he got knocked down it didn’t appear to me that the dude was gonna attack him again. Once he seen his gun he was about to walk away. Then again I don’t think I would pull my gun in a situation like that cause even though the threat was there it wouldn’t be enough for me to pull my gun. Could’ve been avoided smh
He absolutely does. I live in an area FULL of these kinds of folks. They feed on a steady diet of Right-wing radio and TV, and combine a grandiose sense of self-importance with a finely-tuned persecution complex. I have friends and family just like this guy; talking to them leaves you with the disturbing sense that they are DYING for the chance to drop someone.
@Enclave Soldier That's not even close to what I said.
I spent 27 years in a cult. I know firsthand how indoctrination works. And in the same way that religious ideology can lead to extremism, so can political ideology.
Don't misunderstand - I don't for a SECOND believe that conservatives have the market cornered on insanity. You have zealots all over the place.
I do, however, have plenty of people in my life with a certain political narrative that sound exactly like Mr. Drejka. It's not hard to see how a constant reinforcement of that narrative can lead to direct action in the real world.
@Tom EvertonI didn't. If you'll read my second comment, I specifically laid out how it's a group of people I'm familiar with in my personal life that have a specific view on the world.
I personally think that most people - across the political spectrum - are basically decent. But we're all easily propagandized because of the tribal nature of our species.
All I'm saying is that the man in the video sounds identical to the group I happen to be familiar with.
@Enclave Soldier I wouldn't say "every". We don't live in a world of absolutes. And if you genuinely believe what you said then you have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe there's a higher percentage in the vehement Trump supporters, though still not *everyone*. But there's more variety throughout everyone who just voted for him in general. My parents alone disprove you. Not saying I agree with them just that not EVERYONE who voted for him wants a way to legally kill someone
@JediNiyte not just right wingers. there's a very specific demo the NRA has courted ....older, socially awkward, lonely men.....feeding them dumbass needlessly violent Michael Bay/Steven Seagal/Jack Bauer type shows and movies..... it's these older men, who somehow have failed at their own ambitions yet somehow have enough money to have a mini-arsenal of shotguns, assault rifles, etc.... their feelings of inadequacy force them to play rambo in shooting ranges and walk around everywhere strapped to the teeth.... these dudes, who didn't have the courage, intelligence, or mental fortitude to join the military or in law enforcement.... yet they are somehow allowed to walk around with guns on their hips .... these guys are everywhere.....
@Dr. Lex Winter crimes by the "left wing"? Like the Black Panthers, the Weather Underground? Those are the last "left-wing" crime syndicates I can think of and they were in the 70s. Unless you're trying to say ALL crime that isn't directly politically motivated must be "left-wing". And the statistics absolutely DO show that domestic terrorist groups are overwhelmingly right-wing. Multiple FBI reports have shown this since the Obama years. While the last major organized efforts were in the 90s (the armored car heist in Oregon, the OKC bombing), we have had plenty of people influenced by their rhetoric show up in unorganized events. Dylan Roof, the Charlottesville protest, etc. Many, many smaller less fatal incidents meant to harass and intimidate including temple and Jewish cemetery vandalism. Right wing rhetoric is on the rise here. No one feels safe because of it. It's an issue.
@Tommy steel ??? The Black Lives Matter movement is a protest movement to bring awareness to over policing, targeting and killing black people. It's a spontaneous movement that has been protesting changes since 2014. ANTIFA is some weird thing talked about on Fox News and by our president but isn't an organization. It means "antifascist", so any time you are fighting against a neonazi, or a draconian militarized police force or OUR PRESIDENT, you could be called Antifa. It's a series of tactics in RESPONSE to fascists. Fascists go away = Antifa goes away. I'm not saying people hurt during protests isn't "real" violence... but I am saying the militia group in the woods who has been stockpiling high firepower weapons for years and believes in "the White Replacement theory" is who you have to worry about, because they're planning something.
@Tommy steel Ps... "according to antifa"? Where are you getting this? Antifa is not an organization, they are tactics for fighting against fascism. If you meet a white supremacist tomorrow who wants to harass some black kids and you say 'No', that would make you antifa. So I don't get this idea that Trump supporters are being "targeted" by antifa. Doesn't make sense
@Tommy steel Who are Antifa? I already said: there is no organization called antifa. Antifascism is a movement or a set of tactics in the presence of those promoting fascist rhetoric. If you oppose racial injustice or are against jailing political opponents or fight for the equality of the working class YOU are antifa. Who is getting attacked (other than verbally) for supporting our dumb-as-bricks, divisive, corrupt, weak, do-nothing-but-blame-others, pushover of a president?
@Joanie Bologna it is pretty funny how no trump supporters are irrational but they will come oyt of the woodwork to write essays about how THEY ARE TOTALLY NOT INDOCTRINATED AND THEY ARE ACTUALLY VERY SMART AND NOT AT ALL RACIST
He's what I call a "military cosplayer". I am a little leery of guys that are always carrying a gun, like it's part of their identity. You know they aren't carrying that gun because they don't want to use it. Many of these guys are just dying to be a "hero".
you're just bullying him for his usage of the word 'negative', probably don't deserve to be shot for that but it's the typical kind of aggression one experiences ,
On one side i do perfectly understand thst sometimes you look at a situation in retrospect and realize you got it all crazy wrong. I remember game of baseball when I was a teen, I confused one of my team members for playing the other team and hit the ball from their hand, only to proudly whatch my opponent making a home run. It still creeps me out how I was able to not only confuse the easy rules of german version highschool baseball but also to feel like the hero for some minutes. I am the kind of person who gets everything wrong ALL the time.
Than I have a look on what is rooted deep in the white community in us and all over the world: "black people are gangsters" I know consiously this is untrue. I even dated a poc guy, nicest and calmest guy i ever met. I would still cross the road if a huge black guy would head toqarda me at night. It is implemented in our heads that a character is worse the darker the skin is (starting with aladdin and lion kind where all good charakters are lighter coloured than the villians).
So I believe he truly was panicking. He was unconsiuosly racist thinking that his victim would come at him no matter what. Would kill him. He was scared.
But was he the victim here? No. He got himself a gun permit. He qent into a store and purchased a weapon to carry along and to use if threatened. To kill. He made the consious decision thst he would arm himself therefore he took on the responsibility of bringing a weapon into any conflict. He had the responsibility to make sure this weapon would not be used agsinst innocent people. Than he startet the conflict. He felt the need to enforce the parking rules (which is ok in general, important even) but he admita he only did aproach the car because he was armed so he felt protected and he was facing a woman and her young children. Thats what gave him the courage, the fact thst he was an armed man going against a mom and children. He was sure to be winnning. But than he was thrown to the ground not feeling so big anymore and pulled the trigger because of what he thought he sees not what he saw.
He never took the time to ask himself: Can I be trusted with a gun? Am I the kind of person who can use a gun responsibly?
If you are to cowardly to approach someone over wrong parking without a gun, do not approach them.
This Is a pretty sad situation, The entire accident could’ve been avoided. Sure, They shouldn’t have parked in a handicap spot, but shooting someone is Way too extreme a reaction for being pushed down
“Negative I applied Forced Multiplier” Negative I neutralized the threat” “Negative I stood my ground” This fool was so excited to be talking to the cops.
@Ra Yeah definitely. He thought they were all buddies. Which is a good one on the cops. He's way more likely to speak casually and not watch his words as carefully.
I hate this guy, he wants to be a victim so bad. Idk how the law is in america but here the only way to shot a person is in the leg twice . You have to have HUGE PROOF that you ACTUALLY WERE GOING TO BE MURDERED to even dare to shoot a person . Also here guns are illegal so...i think is better.
@Nyx Many people in this counrty use guns to legitimately defend themselves against violent criminals. Removing guns from our law abiding citizens would leave only the criminals with guns. This guy is a trigger happy nut, but don't judge all gun owners by the actions of this guy. Americans will never stand for the government to take our guns.
@Rhea B well, my country is a lot more peacefull, but the thing is, here nobody has acess to a gun. Only the police, so there is no way a criminal could buy one, there are no gun stores , not even online. But mabye i dont understand it because in the city i live the worst thing that can happen is to meet a bear random on the street. We had one seral killer in the 90' but he didnt have a gun, he just killed people with a knife. The only murders i heard of in the news had nothing to do with guns, never. Not even the police use them , and if they do, they shoot only in the leg. I know is more dangerous outthere but the thing is, if they were illegal , the rate of mortality will be lower. And what are the odds to have a gun on you when someone attacks you? What are the odds to actually have a chance to use them before is too late? Criminals kill more people with those guns than the number of people that save their lives with them. Well, it is anyways too late to make them illegal now.
@Nyx shooting someone in the leg is incredibly difficult and can be extremely deadly because there's massive arteries in the area and the gunshot victim can bleed out very quickly. If you're pulling a weapon in fear of your life you're aiming for the biggest target, the torso. But that's only if you're in true fear for your life.
This isn't the movies where you can just pause time and aim wherever, if it was I'm sure most people would shoot knives and guns out of each others hands instead of ending a life, something 99% of gun owners in the USA hope to never do.
@ten i said i my country, where, again, only the police can use a gun, but still if they use it they have to plead for every single bullet. They have to first make a warning shot then they can use the gun to shoot , but they are not allowed to kill anybody, unless it will be 100% sure explainable in court. The leg thing and the warning shot is in the law i didnt make it
@Nyx dont shoot them in the legs. There are many many arteries and veins. Become more knowledgeable about using a firearm before you make statements like these👍
@Gwen in my first comment to you i state "i recognize you" which would imply i can distinguish you from other asian people on youtube. think about it...
That Guy2020-12-28 00:20:54 (edited 2020-12-28 00:30:04 )
@Martin Øverby USA is pretty much a country that being held together with duct tape. Sadly sensitive liberals and conservatives argue over petty bullshit. So change is really slow.
10 likes
That Guy2020-12-28 00:26:53 (edited 2020-12-28 00:30:27 )
@Gary Garretson You don't really know socialism. America is far from socialistic. Just because the government does something doesn't make it socialism. Also grow up, using "libtard" just makes you sound like some teenager without actual points. American conservatives are liberals just with classic and judeo-christian beliefs. So they ironically insult themselves.
@Nyx dear it is very possible to buy illegal guns on whatever black market situation is going on over there. That happens in every country. I sleep next to my gun because my city is dangerous. Very dangerous.
@Raven Beaudoin every country has its dangerous people, in my country we have reapers, killers , abusers etc but in my 20 years i have barelly barelly heard of shooting . It is far more dangerous to live in a bad place knowing they have acces to a gun as you are , are you 100% sure that you will have the gun on you when someone will try to kill you ? Because they will 100% sure have it on them. The point i am trying to make is ... if you try to ballance how many times people actually defended themselves with the guns and how many times inocent people was been murdered with them , the murder rate is so much higher. You loose more people with guns then without. And yes i might be black markets that i dont know about selling them, but if they are illegal and therefore more rare is a higher chance for the police to find them and a smaller chance for the bad people to find and buy them. Again, i have criminals in my country but none of them actually searched for guns from a dealer , if you cand get one that easy chances are that you will find another way. And i have no pro killer skills but i am pretty sure that a man with a knife is less dangerous than a man with a gun.
@Nyx you are correct, for me though I have to have this gun because like you said I'm 100% sure when they break into my home they will also have one. Ironically I'm much more afraid of being stabbed than shot lol. Glad you are in a safe place, I hope you never have to defend yourself. Happy holidays❤
@Lukas Reiche yeah, that kinda was my point...its the only place you can shoot that will make them stop running and not kill them...you have huge vains in your butt actually. If not in the leg where the police should shoot? In the arms ? That are a harder target and might not actually stop them? In the head or stomach or chest? To kill them instantly or slowly?
@Rhea B if overall it was harder to get guns then it would be harder for everyone to get guns. criminals are not a supply of evil minions entering our world through a portal, they are people. we need to be a lot stricter with existing gun laws and build our police force and it's affectiveness and abilities to be more helpful when needed, in my opinion.
@Axodus wtf think , what are the odds that you will have the gun on you when someone attacks you, and you will also be fast enough and have the precision in that moment to shoot them before they get the chance to shoot or catch you. where are we ? In some sf movies where you magically sesne the danger ,take the gun out of your poket, already loaded and ready to shoot, do a 180° and headshot him . Then you wake up , because this happens only in dreams.
"The latest data show that people use guns for self-defense only rarely. According to a Harvard University analysis of figures from the National Crime Victimization Survey, people defended themselves with a gun in nearly 0.9 percent of crimes from 2007 to 2011."
"The average person ... has basically no chance in their lifetime ever to use a gun in self-defense," he tells Here & Now's Robin Young. "But ... every day, they have a chance to use the gun inappropriately. They have a chance, they get angry. They get scared."
"The use of guns in self-defense by private citizens is extremely rare. VPC research has found a gun is far more likely to be used in a homicide or suicide than in a justifiable homicide. More guns are stolen each year than are used in self-defense."
"In 2017, the FBI reports there were only 298 justifiable homicides involving a private citizen using a firearm. That same year, there were 10,380 criminal gun homicides. Guns were used in 35 criminal homicides for every justifiable homicide."
Here you go buddy, these are articles wrote by people in your country not mine, ask them if they are right or wrong. Idk how the fuck can you say i am wrong when is just real life logic , i dont even need these articles, is just common sense.
The thing that you all dont seem to understand is that is not about YOU is about ALL OF YOU . Don't think just about you having a gun and being safe and probably never even use them. Think about that because you want to have a gun freely another 35 criminals have a gun and 35 people are shot, YOU might be one of those people . Sometimes we have to think ourselves as numbers. Its the same case for corona. What, if you know you have a body strong enough to get over corona, because it happens, i had corona and i was in pain 2 days then i didn't gave a fuck, does that mean you have the right to dont use a mask and go around with no care? No, because when you live in a society is not about you anymore, is about all of you and the number of people you might hurt for spreading corona , no one cares that you dont feel good staying home and wearing a mask, only you care, the society cares about how many people might be hurt if you dont do that.
@Fio Mori idk i think america is broken and couldn't help it so they just gave guns to people to save themselves because the system has failed . That's like giving a depressed person drugs and not actually helping with their problems in life. They might help at the moment but in the long run it does more bad than good. Also it is a bit too late to change anything now, It's not like they could get all those guns back .
@Axodus i mean you just have to act like in a hive if you want to live in a society , they dont care about you as an individual . For example, lets say your parents are abusing you, and after years of abuse you kill them to end your pain. You think the system would care that your daddy was spanking your ass and that gave you trauma? No, you end up in prison for murder, no one cares about you as an individual and about your feelings, they care about how many lives were lost because of you. I am going to say this again , and i am going to stop arguing because this leads nowere. The country needs to take better care of their people and not give guns to take care of themselves. My country is pretty poor but we don't cut eachothers throats to survive. We are one of the safest countries in europe , even tho usually poverty makes violence rise . We do have entire towns full of "dangerous people" but , again, we don't dare to kill people like they are nothing. We kinda have moral values and don't think only about ourselves , we raise our kids , actually RAISE them and not only gave them food and a bed and call it parenting so they dont grow up being criminals. We have been through communism so more than ever we were all we had, so we took care of eachother because we have never been a spoiled ass country as america. We have dark skin people too but never used them as slaves even tho they are a minority so we are in peace with them. We have good and bad people, educated or uneducated, poor and rich like any other country so how does it come that we can be peacefull and don't need guns and you need it? You don't. You need a better system, a better culture, and better people . You all love your country like a spoiled kid that loves his mother for giving him freedom untill they end up with the other bad kids, and america as a good mother tells him "you can beat other kids if you want " to protect him. Wouldn't have been better TO TAKE CARE OF HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE ?
Its crazy how someone can think they're so right despite being so wrong. ^_^
Whatever, stay blissfully unaware, if you dont care about your human rights you have nothing to worry about, just let them take more and more until you have nothing left.
You either have them or you don't, once you give up one of your rights it's already over.
@Raven Beaudoin I have two friends who got stabbed. They said it felt like nothing at all; didn't even realize it till they saw the blood. It's the recovery process that hurts I'd imagine.
@Natty by Nature wow that's fascinating. Where were they stabbed? I'm glad they're both okay, what an experience D:
0 likes
Natty by Nature2021-01-02 09:38:54 (edited 2021-01-02 09:41:30 )
@Raven Beaudoin Thanks, they're both doing OK, well recovered in all aspects ☺️ So, one was an incident at a party, which could have been deescalated (something to do with a woman they were both pursuing lol). The other was, unfortunately, a senseless and unmerited gang attack while my friend was studying in the UK. The knife crime there is just ridiculous.
@Lukas Reicheall im saying is that the argument "just teach them to shoot people in the legs" is not a good argument. You shouldnt be shot anywhere but unfortunately weapons and violence will always exist.
@Natty by Nature as soon as you said UK I was like poor guy was probably just waiting for the bus </3 so glad they're okay!! stay safe out there people are crazy and will do the unthinkable to good people like you ❤🙏
@Aleksi Suuronen the psychology about why he felt like he was reporting to his supervisors when he was talking to the police. No need to get your panties in a bunch & cuss at me! Lol
@A D This can certainly be a convincing argument for the 2nd amendment, however for me (an American citizen myself), but honestly based on my anecdotal experience, not to mention many studies and polls, I'm more afraid of the government that people who tend to care passionately about the 2nd amendment would want to implement by force, and see them as more likely to overthrow a legitimate democracy to enforce actual tyranny, than they are to resist any legitimate authoritarian takeover in the US (see: support for Trump, first president in US history to attempt a coup, whose supporters stormed the seat of our Federal Government).
Besides that, it all depends on who the US army sides with, and while a prolonged, armed insurgency within the US would be little match for the US Armed Forces, it would be apocalyptic for America as a whole, and make the US Civil War in the 19th Century look like nothing.
I love how one guy was like, in my country this ain't a problem and half of the people replying didn't even bother reading or comprehending his posts enough to realize he's not talking about america and all the bullshit they are saying is actually fuelling his points XD. Americans are so indoctrinated most of us can't even think for a second there might be other ways of life out there.
@Victoria Bishop Victoria, we live in a country where there are drive-by's. Other countries don't have those. We live in a country where parents, teachers, students, hell even cleaning staff have to worry about mass shooters. Other countries don't worry about those kinds of things, and when it eventually does happens they often react quickly with laws that prevent it from ever happening again or already have laws that stopped it in the first place.
Having to sleep with a gun to feel safe actually /isn't/ normal for a lot of the first world. You are basically saying there that the US is the safest country in the world, and it frankly isn't.
Aside from what I'm assuming is ignorance of those real dangers that ARE apart of the American Zeitgeist and our day to day lives, who has taught you this way of thinking? The thinking that those who oppose this view point must be lying or crazy?
That is honestly a very unsafe way of thinking, because it disables your ability to ever think critically about your own viewpoints and causes the instant labeling of those people who think differently as enemies. Purely from the thoughts in their heads and the words on your screen. And often, it makes them enemies, because no one wants to be called crazy or attacked just because they share their experience.
I have a different view point from you Victoria, but I am not your enemy and you shouldn't attack my character just because you disagree with me. Even if you are right 99% of the time we all are human and should accept that we are fallible, and so are our opinions. Even Trump, even Biden, even our founding fathers we're slave owners Vicky.
America actually has a HUGE history of being wrong, and the sooner we try to be a better people the sooner we can pull the rest of the planet up with us.
@Pneubeteube If the President sides with gun lobby no wonder your sentiment of We live in a country where parents, teachers, students, hell even cleaning staff have to worry about mass shooters is correct and heart breaking. US is the NOT the safest country in the world, and agree she frankly isn't. Trump, even Biden, even our founding fathers we're slave owners Vicky. That's what i am shouting about. and that needs to change. America is not just Hollywood, there is downtown Disney and it is frightening place
@Victoria Bishop you didn't answer the actual question Victoria.
If you think the US is unsafe then why did you say that anyone who says their country is safer without guns is crazy or a liar? Why did you have that reaction in the first place?
That, dear Vicky, is something I think you should explore.
@Pneubeteube I think we are getting to the stage, anything I say you question. FYI I agreed with you so now I stop replying to to your reply to my post. Let us talk about something else. Have a nice day It is sunshine out there and I am a very good mood because of the sunshine
@Victoria Bishop I understand if this is overwhelming for you, and as such perhaps you shouldn't share your opinions publicly online if you don't want them scrutinized.
I've only questioned one thing you said, which you still have not answered. If anything, your dodging of the fact that you just unjustifiably called someone crazy and/or a liar makes the fact you did it even more concerning. Especially considering you seem to agree with my thinking, so where did that come from?
I will not stop replying to you on this Victoria, because by your age I'm sure you've learned there are consequences for your actions, both direct and indirect. I keep persisting because I'm just so tired of a lack of common decency in political discourse that I honestly fume about it, and frankly Vicky I'm being very patient with you, and consistently have been asking you the same thing because I'm trying to help you see how what you just did was uncalled for and completely ignorant of any experience that is un-american. We can pretend the person on the other side of the keyboard doesn't exist and judge them how we see fit, but the longer we do that the more we erode our ability to communicate.
So, again, Why would you think that man was a liar, even tho you agree that the US is not a safe place and has been wrong in the past?
@Pneubeteube Yes grandmother. I do not need your help teacher. Save it for some gullible soul. Scrutinizing and insulting are two different things. Look at your post- patronizing so and so. so take your custom to somebody. Are you his keeper? then you are not doing good job so go away and find someone to insult. I am done with you.
@Victoria Bishop I haven't insulted you once, just called you out for poor behavior. If you want to act like a child and ignore what you have done and try to attack someone actually being really kind to you on an internet full of hateful assholes then there is little hope for you.
I normally eviscerate those hateful people online Vicky, attack their ideas, not nicely explain to them why they might need to take a look inward for a second. Caring about someone isn't patronizing and the fact you are looking at it this way says my time has in fact been wasted on you.
You do not even know how mean I could have been, lady. How mean most people really would have been. My nice treatment of you is actually an outlier in online discourse. You are lucky. Just think for a moment how this conversation would have been if I had the same energy you had when you attacked that first guy. If I just attacked you instead of questioned your thinking.
@Pneubeteube you don't know me never met me and calling my poor behavior. How dare you. It is none of your business but I did not attack the first guy. Are you his keeper. This is exactly trolls behave. calling me a child is another of your grown up behaviour. I do not agree with you and that's my prerogative. Don't question my thinking first look after your thinking. English labuage is very rich you can chose the words not to offend and still put forward your side. not everyone would agree with you but that's exactly you don't like if you want intelectual grown up discussion and agree to disagree the come back. unless that happens you are not welcome to comment on my comment. you will still do that but then I really don't care anymore what you have to say unless you stop insulting me. find someone else to troll....
@Victoria Bishop by replying to my comment you made it my business, that's how the internet works. How dare I? Lady you called a guy a liar or crazy and you don't even know him, so take some of your own medicine!
Where were all these other words in the English language when you called that guy crazy or a liar? Calling someone a liar/crazy is an attack. My only insult was calling you childish which I feel like you are being as I have done nothing but try to get you to see how what you did was mean and you just won't do it.
Trolls do not try to reason, they only attack. The fact you think I am a troll is incredibly nieve of just how harsh and cruel (and sometimes utterly insane) political discussion on the internet is, probably because you are only used to talking on Facebook and the like with people who agree with you.
Someone who disagrees with you and presses you on it is not a troll. Some one who only replies "ok Boomer" is a troll. Do you see the difference in the amount of positive energy I have tried to push towards you in my comments, compared to someone who would just reply with a cold "ok Boomer, sounds like it's nap time".
Infact Vicky to the average internet user the way you are acting seems far more like you are a Russian troll then I seem like a, I don't know, tries to help old ladies see the error in their thinking troll. Just think about it, if I wanted to troll you I would be insulting you far harder then calling you childish. And I wouldn't be trying to reason with you.
@Rhea B The only reason you think that is because of the 2nd amendment. Which was written 300 years ago. It has just become mythology, part of the founding myth.
I noticed that he went through a lot of trouble to avoid talking about what happened in the morning before he went to the store. Something probably set him off. No excuse, it’s just something I noticed.
Right. Also making it look like a sling even though he isn't claiming to have a broken arm. A bruised arm hurts, but it doesn't require a sling OR a cast. It just hurts.
I mean I've had injuries like this and the pain comes on gradual and the pain can only be there with certain movements. I'm sure he's playing it up a bit but immobilizing your wrist/arm at the onset of pain is just kind of standard protocol but the pain might not be terrible yet to the point that you could flail your arm and not remember that it's been injured
@Saber.jpg. dude the guy is like 50, not in great shape and was blindsided by that douchebag who pushed him...it's pretty easy to sprain your wrist that way and the timeframe from when the incident happens to when he's being interviewed is in line with when the pain starts showing up in my personal experiences. Like I said I don't doubt he might be playing it up but to just straight up be like "he's lying" is the only unreasonable thing here.
@butts yeah, because nothing about that situation is at all threatening.
Like, yeah, he did the wrong thing, but the guy just spent two minutes screaming and yelling because a car wasn't parmed where he thought it should be, its pretty reasonable to take hin for a threat.
@butts In the video it was stated that people in and around the store heard screaming coming from both a man and a woman. I think this is sufficient evidence that he was yelling at the woman.
@butts Why do you have to reply with so much hostility and cynicism? You're so angry I can feel it in my own liver just reading it. Regarding the case, anyone with a small degree of civility can see that it was an over reaction and ridiculous to shove the man so hard to the ground and it's even more so to shoot him for it. How can there even be an argument about this?
@Poultry I'm from the city just how we talk here, swearing here doesn't mean you're hostile. Either way yeah you're right both overreacted. The juice drinkers want to pretend the original shoving scumbag was just "protecting his family" though lmao
@butts Imagine being with your kids and a strange man is in such a hurry he parks in a non existent spot in order to walk around and around your car without any context and then starts verbally harassing you (as proved in video he escalates the situation by re approaching the car once he realizes someone was sitting in it and witnesses stated there was yelling as that was the whole reason the victim came out of the store in a hurry) approaching strangers and acting like you have authority over them and their actions when you have none all sounds pretty aggressive to me.
@Ubloo I asked about physical contact, not aggressive "harassing". If I was some bottom feeder that parks in handicapped spots because I felt entitled to it, I would think I would at least understand why people would call me out about it and I certainly would aggressively argue with them and escalate it even further when I'm in the wrong. I also wouldnt violently attack the person calling me out, even if they were yelling. Then again, I'm a civilized person living in a civilized area, you seem to identify more with the bottomfeeders.
@butts Shoving someone is violently attacking but shooting someone while they are retreating is an act of a civilized man? If someone parking illegally pisses you off more than killing someone who is retreating then you need therapy, but I have a feeling you dont really think that and like I said your true colors are showing. I'd rather be a bottom feeder than such a 🐱 coward that I bring out a gun in a shoving match in a situation i started
If Drejka were telling the truth about the victim charging him after the first push rather than stepping back there may be room for debate here but the video doesn't lie. Justice was done. I with the victim's family well.
JIM YOUR ALMOST AT FIVE MILLION SUBS CONGRATULATIONS 🍾 !!!! You deserve it buddy!! + I am so happy I’ve been along for the ride! You are an absolute genius & I love your content !!!
Wow. Why is another humans life regarded as so cheap? To pull a gun seems a drastic measure to take, but to then go one step further and shot another person is just appalling. If the gut was running at him with a knife then maybe, but he was backing off. Surely after the gun is pulled you would hope the person you are pointing it at retreats, which is what happened here. Why that man thought to pull the trigger is beyond me.
This should be a lesson to all of us. The next time we think about shouting at somebody, or arguing, or belittling them, maybe stop and think. People have families, other people who love them. Some people are just having a bad day or a rough time of it. Try support, understanding and forgiveness first. It doesn't show weakness to be nice and it doesn't show strength to be cruel.
Seeing altercations like this is why I don’t get into confrontations with other people I don’t know. You never know what people are gonna do these days.
@Sophia P Really? Hmm. I think sometimes it is hard to be right and not tell another person that what they are doing is wrong no matter what race they are. Lol,
Australia doesn’t have these problems with guns I don’t know why American doesn’t change there rules. In Australia we still own guns just can’t buy them at Walmart it’s honestly a joke
@Coast Life once guns are outlawed in the US they will eventually be off the streets via the police. Then the black market price for guns will skyrocket and most criminals won’t be able to afford them. See Australia and most other developed nations that banned guns. Gun violence fell drastically not increased.
@Stringfellow Hawk don't let stuff like this influence your decision to come to the US. The vast majority of gun deaths in the US are suicides and gang crime. People do not go around acting like this guy. I mean, just look at all the comments from Americans about him.
@Michael Zomsuv I absolutely have to disagree, this was not self defense. Shooting someone over being pushed. His life was not at threat. The man just wanted to shoot. I mean when he drew his gun the black man started to walk back the altercation should have ended no need to actually shoot and kill.
@Plorin At what point exactly was i arguing? I was simply pointing out how stupid all of those guys ‚argumants‘ sound, it wasn‘t meant to have any substance. 😊 I‘m not here to convert people, i‘m here to have my fun an cringe at peoples stupid excuses for a murderer. If you‘re searching for intellectual discussions, then you might wanna leave Youtube comments and look for a discussion group in your area or something like that. 😂
@naegi makato Is it reasonable to attack someone in the first place? You're omitting the initial use of force. Using your metaphor it wasn't a swing (which is already a violent act with intent of dealing damage) but a delivered blow, a major one too. What's reasonable force when you're on the ground and an aggressive attacker is towering over you? Do you know how little time it takes to close the gap and continue the physical attack, maybe taking one's gun and using it against the victim? Do you think you'd be completely cool and rational in his place?
He shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
@hotdyme86 obviously shooting someone because they pushed you isn’t on the same level but pushing someone hard from their blind spot onto payment because of words is just as bad
@Coast Life How about you move to North Korea then. USA is a great country and just cause we have a gun problem doesn't make the USA a fucked place to live in we have the most rights out of every country yes every country you don't have the freedom of speech in Britian and Canada the governemnt has the right to stop newspapers from saying certain things in those countries. We also have baseball and football..
I don't think living in fear is the way to go. To each his own, but if I see someone parked in a handicapped spot and it's clear the person is not handicapped, I will tell them they are in a handicapped spot. Now I don't live in the USA, so I'm not afraid of someone pulling a weapon. Maybe that's a huge difference, I don't know.
@FlymanMS He did NOT have to fire that shot over a petty fight and any reasonable man could've found other routes to take. Maybe use the gun as leverage if the thought of him taking it occurs to you?
Uh oh he hit me. Go tell your teacher don't grab a fricking gun! Or talk it out like real men. REAL MEN (and women) don't need guns. They have common sense
He should’ve never approached the car to begin with. He went to the store to buy whatever it is he was supposed to buy. He should’ve minded his business and went about his day. He was trying to play police when he should’ve went about his normal day. There wasn’t a handicap person in distress for the spot. He wasn’t handicap so that spot is of no importance to him. While I agree it’s ignorant parking in handicap, it’s also none of my business.
@Stone Devil there's always going to be a vast majority for any kind of statistic. that same statistic is also true in the UK. In the UK, in 2016, 107 deaths were caused by firearms. 85 of those were suicides. The vast majority of gun deaths in the UK are suicides. Ironically enough, despite some of the strictest gun laws in the world, guns still account for 8% of all homicides in the UK. Apparently criminals with the intent to murder aren't concerned with obeying gun laws.
@Axel I agree. I still think the main point is that unless there is something threatening happing in your surroundings, life is much smoother if you mind your business lol I grew up in a terrible area and I’ve survive it by just simply minding the business that pays me lol now I live in a completely different state and it’s more suburbs. While I know most of the people in my neighborhood by simply just living there... Guess what ? I still mind my business lol I own firearms but I would hope that I’m never put in a position where I have to use it. In this case, I think he definitely couldn’t wait.
@Wabi Sabi You know what? I didn't know that. Thanks. But truth be told, although I personally believe what I said meaning if i go somewhere where there is an official gun death statistic and guns were literally everywhere I would be scared out of my mind, it was made more as a snarky comment rather than a serious point or argument
I blame the system allowing Tom, Dick and Harry allowed to carry a fire arm. If he didn't have the gun he would have ended up with some broken bones and a life would be saved and 20 years of his.
tell me just how was he first released without charge when the guy he shot was already dead? wtf is that? in my country he would be in jail no matter why he shot the other guy, and the trial would be 2 years later
Proves how genuine he was in his explanation that he was just trying to neutralize the threat. Only used one bullet, waited for police, fully cooperated with police without an attorney (big mistake) and rid the world of one more drug addict criminal. WIN!!
He did get away with it. The cops let him go free after this interrogation and stated in a public press conference that he wouldn't be charged. It's only because the district attorney independently charged him that he went to jail at all. He didn't just think the cops were on his side, they actually were on his side.
@Farco I think he had a legit claim to fear of greivous bodily harm. If he hadn't have pulled his gun I think he would have gotten his head stomped. He hesitated a little too long.
The craziest part is this guy legitimately thinks he had no choice. The guy was 15 feet away from him with no weapon and he had no choice but to kill him because he got a shoulder boo boo. ROTC drop out at its finest
33:57 of course at the moment that he opened his mouth without consulting an attorney he lost his case... But this dude said he was going to finish what he started... Man you started that whole altercation by confronting those people about a placard that you don't issue
Unfortunately if I am the jury I find difficult to say it is a 'stand your ground' case. The victim didn't pose any threat, actually retreating, when his gun was pulled. There was no point pulling the trigger at that moment. Guilty of manslaughter is fair.
Not only that but he was pushed in the first place because he was standing there taking pictures of a woman’s car and yelling at her! Obviously the one who was shot felt that piece of shit was threatening. That asshole can’t say he felt threatened when he was obviously the threatening one to everyone that was inside freaking out about him yelling at the woman!
@Nathaniel Ward a random guy who he killed. Very different than some random guy you never met. Being responsible for the immoral death of someone else is a terrible thing
@Nathaniel Ward broooo youre sooo right! I’m so emotional and you’ve never had an emotion in your life!! That makes you even more edgy bro 😩🙏 I’m sure you’re super popular with the ladies 😭
@Nathaniel Ward I wouldn't kill them though, and if I did,, I would feel the gravity of taking another humans life.. that's the difference between psychopaths and normal people
@Ivy Brooks I don't think you know what edgy means. Their comment was very valid. Why would this man who doesn't know this guy (who had attacked him first) care whatsoever about the death of someone he had shot? Of course, he shouldn't have shot, and his response was weird, but what makes you think someone is edgy because the other user understands this crazy man doesn't care about the victim.
@Keep crying well seeing as though edgy is subjective, perhaps you don’t know what it means? The word valid is also subjective, do you know what valid means?
The dude didn’t attack him to the point of needing to use self defense, hence why he’s in prison. To shoot someone in cold blood and not care that you killed them is psychopath behavior, and if you think that’s normal, maybe you have some psychopathic tendencies as well?
@P so pushing someone equals death to you, okay gotcha...found another psycho. Has nothing to do with perspective or MY opinion, it is a fact. Also we are not talking about someone random dying, we're talking about you killkng someone.
@Nathaniel Ward You’re not very good at getting the point across but I know what you’re trying to say
For all of the goons sitting here acting like Nathaniel is gonna be in the next video, pay attention to what he’s actually saying. Why would Michael Drejka, a racist who happily shot a retreating man for pushing him, care about that man? Nathaniel isn’t saying that it’s the right way to respond but that’s literally just how Michael would, and it shouldn’t surprise anyone given his interrogation and actions up to that point.
It’s not right for him to think that way but unfortunately that’s just how it is
@Ivy Brooks Harry Ranyard and Nathaniel Ward are the same people. Just look at the punctuations and use of emojis. Same person bro. You busted his eggplant.
I think you have the context wrong, he says that nobody else would tell him how the guy is doing like he's asked and they've told him after nobody else would
@Nathaniel Ward you’re right. the moral, human reaction of someone after unintentionally killing another person is panic, uncertainty, remorse, sadness, etc. but since this man killed this other man out of cold blood it’s just right for him to react this way.
Wow this comment thread is idiotic and you internet geniuses that believe you're the knights in shining white armour, allow me to translate what that Nathaniel Ward guy was saying: If the suspect was cowardly and cold blooded enough to shoot the victim after said victim shoved him because of an argument the suspect started himself, then he would act just as cowardly and cold blooded after learning he needlessly ended the victim's life, rather than being empathetic and remorseful like any normal person would. Don't forget that the suspect is sticking to his version of events that makes the killing justifiable, so to learn that he justifiably took someone's life wouldn't bare much weight on his conscience. Even though in reality there was obviously nothing justifiable about it whatsoever. He was the instigator and the aggressor who is also trying to play the victim.
The lack of brain cells on the internet never ceases to amaze me. Mob mentality even when you're all wrong.
@Nathaniel Ward It’s only basic empathy. You should care what happens to anyone to a certain extent. Even if he made a deeply reprehensible decision at the moment, he could still have the humanity to regret it. It obviously doesn't begin to rationalize/justify what they did, but the point is how you can almost never have a precise understanding of another human's mind. While there's a common way which every mind works, it's in such a way where what's actually behind people's thoughts and decisions can range from interesting, to confusing, to outright delusional, and in analyzing those kinds of attitudes you can only really hope for a few of countless reasonable possibilities, some likelier than others. Sounds super pretentious, but that's just the way I see it and how it seems to work.
@Elia Elirko agreed. But there's some states that you have to be so careful with saying something like "I'm sorry". Once you say that.. they can shift the narrative around your apology. So then you have to be more careful with words like saying "I am sorry to hear that." But then they people can spin it in different ways.
Watching this video kinda shows how poor the law is. The narrator even says "a lawyer would have emphasized the safety of himself without a shred of doubt" And considering how many people like him get a lawyer and say "I was scared he would kill me" and self defense is fine.
The fact we can watch this and say 2.5 seconds is a long time, if you've ever been in a situation where there's high adrenaline.. 2.5 seconds feels like forever and an instant. So.. realistically this guy would've probably gotten away with it if be had a lawyer.
Then at which case, we wouldn't see any of this and then we would claim unjust laws etc.
Watching this video really highlights the importance of lawyers words in determining someone's freedom or not. Which in my opinion is silly. This turns the justice system into a joke almost. As this guy would've been free if he had a lawyer.
@Nathaniel Ward “if you would immorally kill someone you probably wouldn’t care. “ yes sir. That’s the point we are making. Most people don’t kill people. Most people would react with sadness and regret for having their actions lead to the death of another human being.
@Please Fire Greg Roman so just because it’s the internet, you’re going to just harass and bully a guy? That’s disgusting. He made a very serious point. Why is everyone in this thread thinking that this murderer is sane enough to care about killing someone? He’s disgusting, so he didn’t even think about his actions. That’s what Nathaniel was saying, and you think it’s okay to attack him? 😬
@Bárbara Froto you clearly can’t read Barbara? Why are you lying about what I said? Your comment is irrelevant. Next time, make a valid comment, and don’t lie and say I was defending him? THATS weird😂
@Farmer Fpv wtf are you on about? Are you insane? We were both making similar points. Could I argue that everyone else in the thread is the same person, because they all missed the point? The point they were getting across was that this racist murderer OBVIOUSLY wouldn’t care if he killed someone, because he is proud of it: do you understand now? I’m sorry your comprehension skills are awful, but it doesn’t mean anyone was defending his actions
@Oliver Reyes Oliver, can you not read whatsoever? They aren’t acting tough. All they were doing was pointing out that this racist murderer is so weird that he obviously wouldn’t care that he killed someone. You just misread it, and instead decided to attack this guy? Learn to read before typing out bs first😂
@Overly Aggressive Machine are you okay? That’s exactly the point Nathaniel is making. That the man is psychotic, so he didn’t care, and why would he? He is a racist murderer who thought he did good, so of course he doesn’t care🤨.
Lmao so much crying. He will enjoy his 20 years but that muppet who sucker pushed him to the ground he won't. The lesson is clear. :D if he just asks where is the problem and doesn't attack him he could live today.
@Nathaniel Ward I had to re read what you said to understand lol. People think you’re support the shooter when really you’re saying “why would this pos show any emotion”
@Olive cheetoman YES THANK YOU! 😆 some people are understanding me, others think I'm with the killer. I really messed up that wording but I'll just let it rock 😎
@greg77389 Tell that to the court, he got 20 years, with the prosecution basing their case upon prior incidents where he threatened people with a handgun over road rage, that he was willing to put himself in a situation, wherein any escalation would result in him using lethal force and even camera footage that did not put him in a good light to say the least
@Herbert West If someone shoves you to the ground, that is reason enough to fear for your life. The reason he was found guilty is because enough time passed when he aimed the gun at him while he was backing away. If the guy kept coming towards him, it would be a different story.
I certainly haven’t watched all of the court proceedings but from what was shown, his lawyer came off as very disingenuous and presented his argument in a very very poor way.
Just found out about this age and im on a streak for the past two days. Think ive seen 6-7 vids now and my psyche went up and down. Im getting smarter, dumber even, i laughed, cringed, swallowed my spit heavily a few times, watched a whole episode of 1.30 hr with my glass of water in my hand which i wanted to drink but really couldnt, and so on and on. Finally im out of the bullsh1t of those billionaires and finally watching some everyday stuff
Notice how in both the Michael Drejka and Michael Dunn case, neither of them show emotion when informed the person they shot passed away, but immediately start tearing up when you mention their dog?
He didn't know him, he didn't even see the face of that man very well. He looked sad though, but there's no reason for him to tear up, even if he wanted to.
all these people are saying yeah well he didn’t know the guy, but like presumably it would be upsetting to know you killed a person even if you don’t know them.
@Dzidkapl haha I would, but I'm not saying that. Just that not knowing the person who died isn't really the point it's knowing that you killed a human being.
You must not be too well schooled. That "tearing up" in a natural visceral response. Your Dad must have taught you to keep yours so suppressed you wouldn't cry if a lost child was found. Poor you.
Well, people generally have an emotional attachment to their pets. This dude shot a guy who attacked him. The killing was unjust, but still, you don't just immediately slam someone into the pavement in front of your kids without at least asking them what the hell they're saying to your girlfriend.
@Sadie K yeah, but that takes time to set in. This guy was still in a mental tailspin. It would likely cause him to get emotional later on once it sinks in that he killed a father. If it were me and I felt justified in my actions, why would I be compelled to weep?
They're so far gone mentally speaking that they've either completely absolved themselves of any guilt in their mind (and therefore do not have any sympathy for their victims) or they simply do not care at all. Yet when their dogs are brought into the equation, when their families are mentioned, it is when their personal lives are brought up that they show actual emotion. Because they're going to suffer the repercussions of their actions, and harm coming their way is a completely different story than harm going someone else's way.
if they are playing the position that they felt their lives were in danger, (the only way that would justify what they did) they wont show emotion after finding out they killed the person that they "truly felt" was going to kill them, so in a way it makes sense in both cases for them not get emotional because they are playing the "it was him or me" obviously in both cases nothing was actually justified due to all of the evidence proving that neither were really in any danger,
They both also flaunt their self delusions regarding their combat abilities. Kids in the picture, asinine reason to pull and shoot, convinced that the police support their actions from the absolute start, zero emotion when they find out the opinion of law enforcement is that they killed without justification...Eerily similar; even the initials are accounted for :D
@Andrew Wertz It's way different if he's in court, as im sure you know basically everything that happens in court is just acting cause that's what it takes to not get charged with stuff
@Sadie K yeah they're not thinking about it in the fact of him killing him, just the fact that yeah they themselves wouldn't care much of a random person dying so why should he? But that is not what is the case, if you defend yourself with use of a weapon. Your aim is to protect yourself not kill the offender, you'd feel awful if you did, he doesn't care so I guess his aim was to, with intent, kill that man
@Professor Gunk that's stupid interpretation. I mean overall it's the messed up "everyone can own a gun" law, but aside of this if you feel in danger and we know the crime rates of random shootings or stabbings , IF you have an noradrenaline shoot you don't think "hm where can I aim that he won't die but just not stab or punch me to death?" no, he had no second. he turned and shot. And why would you feel awful towards someone hurting you? IF you do THAT would be messed up. It's karma. He didn't have to push him, he wouldn't have gotten shot. But the way he backed off into the store to me even makes me think the other guy planned to kill the guy with the gun on purpose.
Also the dog thing: If there is a person hurting me on purpose (he could have hit his head on ground and also died on brain bleedings btw), why would I show a) mercy, b)remorse c) grief? But there is an innocent animal being and mabye you like dogs. Of course I would cry over a dog, a cat, another random pet oO
What? But this guy clearly showed emotion? He became noticeably solemn. If I thought someone had attacked me for no good reason, I wouldn't start sobbing or anything if I learned that they had died.
@Sadie K No it's not. If i found out that you're dead i would be like "meh, happens". And there's nothing wrong with me, a lot of people dying everyday and i'm aware of that.
You're about face charges and a lot of troubles because of that person. It's completely normal to not react to that. I'll give you another example: let's say a girl has been raped and she managed to hit him with a blunt weapon and get away quickly. Then she was told by the police that he actually died. Should she feel remorse or sadness for that matter? No.
Why on earth someone who assumed that he was in his right to shot the person would feel otherwise?
Right!! Like if I had been notified that I had killed someone I would probably break down into tears. I never could harm another person intentionally. If I ever did kill someone it would have to be like some freak car accident, and even then I would still cry over the loss of a life.
@Sadie K He didn't care for him to the point he shot him. Get a life. Out of all the things to flex on, getting mad at a murderer for not feeling empathy for the stranger he killed is bizarro 101
@Jordan Storey Yeah, That's right! Like the time when the Police caught me killing my wife. I cried. I was crying because I got caught but, I still had the decency to cry! These people have no feelings! If I was the judge they'd get five years extra for not crying, shocking behaviour!
Yep he'd already won the altercation in stand off terms. Shooting a backing off assailant is pure murder. He wanted the guy to keep coming, disappointed he shot him anyway. Super lame. Disgusting. Best defense: diminished mental faculties. 21:19.
He describes himself as an average, everyman guy with the same issues, just like most people. He neglects to mention the main difference between himself and most people, he was carrying a gun and thought it justified his actions. Most people don't carry guns.
@أبو ليلى to be a threat to him he'd have to be threatening him or coming at him. So no its not right but also no a little push and then not coming at him or trying to harm him any farther was not a reason to shoot him kids get pushed on the damn play ground. He wasn't coming at him he didn't harm him seriously he wasn't threatening him he didn't have a weapon. He had no reason to shoot him with his family right there.
I love his speech. A true warrior, trained by nothing than the best, both of em, battlefield and CoD. He deserves a medal, no, the noble peace prize! Everyone should be a little cop like him. That's how we save america! God bless the USA, Donald Trump and the weapon industrie xD
The cops could have directly asked if he thought his life was in danger and he would have said "negative", then still he wouldn't admit that he was in the wrong.
I was actually thinking about that shitty ass response he may have been able to been saved. I feel horrible for those kids who saw their father die in front of em.
Chances are the hospital was 19 minutes away. That seems close when you don't need a paramedic, but far when you do. They can speed, but generally not by all that much.
@Umatsu Obossa They are usually on patrol, the possibility is that they were preoccupied or this happened when ambulances were both equally far away from the incident. Meaning that they just happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time
@Metal Tao Well either way, the comments seem to mean to imply tge ambulance was deliberately slow in getting there, and I'm quite sure that's not the case.
I'm a paramedic supervisor with 25 years' experience. A couple of things to consider (especially number 2):
1. There are some rural areas where it routinely takes 15 or 20 minutes to get an ambulance. I have no idea where this event occurred, but even in the city where I work, it can sometimes take fifteen minutes. We have approximately 5 to 8 ambulances, covering a city of 200,000 people. One patient can tie up an ambulance for an hour (extricating the patient, transport, cleaning, hand-off report, etc). All it takes is a single accident involving multiple patients, to tie up all of our ambulances.
2. (Most importantly) On a violent call, we don't enter the scene until it's been declared safe by law enforcement. So it's common-practice to "stage" several blocks away from the patient, until we are cleared to go in. This is entirely dependent upon law enforcement, but it's not uncommon for us to find ourselves staging for fifteen or twenty minutes.... or even up to an hour, in some cases.
As a paramedic, that's the first thing I noticed. Our average response time is less than 7 minutes and I can't think of any calls that required 19, even in rural areas.
An ambulance isn’t always just around the corner of any emergency. I have a few paramedic friends who’ve shared their regrets that they were the closest unit to a situation but, were still too far away to get there in time enough to save the person in need.
Scene safety is the first thing ems thinks about when entering a dangerous situation. The police must secure the scene to make sure the threat is clear before ems moves in.
Robert P in my city the ambulances come from a 3rd party company, not from the hospital itself. That being said, if you don’t how far away the ambulance is from the scene, you can’t really assume the response time.
If it were my friend shot I'd get him into the car and make it to the hospital before the AmberLance is even dispatched. But in some communities people just stand around watching and doing nothing but wait for someone else to help. Like David Dorn. Or that dude the woman ran over, spat on, and slammed the cars back bumper over his head. While everyone just watched.
@NSA I call BS. It replies like this that is hurting our nation now. Ambulances are not hanging out on every damn corner. Speaking of knowing many drivers.
@Michael Julian You live in a small area than. It takes over 20 to get to a local hospital. Less all the traffic in front of every single light. Here the ambulances are also at the Fire Departments.
the average response time is around 8-9 minutes, so this response time seemed low , but about 90 percent of all the response times are below about 15 minutes....which means 10 percent of the time they are longer than 15 minutes.
in my area thats pretty good. we only have one ambulance and probably 120 square miles of county lol
0 likes
Hermit of Swords2020-08-16 09:35:22 (edited 2020-08-16 09:36:28 )
911 dispatcher here:
Ambulances don't always come from the hospital. In many cases they come from their own private ems/fire station, and are sent by the county/city dispatchers. It's possible that the ambulance in that area was already on another call or transporting, and usually the ems supervisor or dispatch would organize the next closest, or tell the closest that's on a call to break off if they can and head that way. That said, in my area, ambulances won't proceed into any violent calls unless the scene is secure by officers, and that's also a possibility here. There's really no saying exactly what went on with response time without the call report.
@Frank Marano thats not up to anyone to determine! First responders are the only ones who can estimate the type and extent of victim's injuries. 20 min arrival time in a shooting like this ensures pretty much that our guy bled to death but thats easy to say with hindsight.
@Frank Marano I understand. Its just that I've been in situations where we called 911 (no shooting tho coz this is Europe) and the ambulance always arrived within 5 to 7 min max. It just blows my mind every time that this type of exchange can actually result in a death. Simply bc people are allowed to carry a gun. Where I live this may have been a nasty verbal argument and both parties would leave the place pissed maybe... but alive.
I'm an EMT. The town I grew up in was about 25 minutes from the nearest hospital. Not to mention, the closest ambulance was about 10-15 minutes away from the furthest part of their district. Sometimes we also run into problems when we are taking someone to the hospital while another call comes out. I agree 19 minutes is a long response time, but unfortunately sometimes it happens. That doesn't make it right, I'm just explaining some possible reasons for the 19 -minute response time.
@Robert P - Ambulance's don't respond from Hospitals, they are generally private companies and 99.9% of the time they are coming from some point in a zone that they drive around between calls or their Companies location. The average EMS response time in the U.S. is 7 minutes in the Cities and Suburbs to 14 minutes in the more rural parts of the Country, so 19 minutes is definitely NOT a very good response.
Welcome to America. If my memory is correct, the average ambulance response time in America is about thirteen minutes. I'm probably not remembering right, but I do know that the ambulance response time in America isn't very good.
They always do that where I’m from if they know wherever the bullet hit , head, stomach any main arteries they know 9 times out of ten they won’t make it so they take their time until they’ve passed then pronounce the deceased at the hospital. Sad
19 minutes is a really long time.. I live 15 minutes from any major town in rural louisiana and my dad had a brain hemorrhage and the ambulance was there in about 5 to 8 minutes. He ended up dying. But I was impressed with how fast they arrived.
@ClockzTickin Exactly, I dunno why everyone acting like there's an ambulance on every block. I mean how often do you see an ambulance that isn't actively going to a scene or back to the hospital with sirens blaring? You almost never see them, so I dunno why people expect they should drop out of the sky when you need one.
Yeah it does suck. By the injuries sustained there’s not a whole lot they could have done when they got there anyways. If it hit his lung, he’s gonna need a chest tube immediately and that’s not something paramedics can do unfortunately. To be totally honest though many southern states’ EMS is understaffed. Or at least from my experience. I work in emergency medicine in New Orleans.
For example I live only 3-4 kilometers of a hospital but it would already take 5 minutes to get here plus probably +-1 min from the end of the call to actually leave the hospital. So if the hospital or fire station is like 10-20 kilometers away a 19 minute response is reasonable. 19 minute. drive isn't long but when you need an ambulance it will feel very long.
@Matt Pike I've been an EMT in a medium sized city, we're stationed so that we have coverage over the city so that one of our ambulances is never more than six minutes away from any location in the city. A nineteen minute response time is abysmal.
@Caleb McIntosh well in a place like Kansas city, you'd never make it in 6 minutes. Its just too spread out. Even in the small town I live in, you might be waiting for 10 minutes
@Matt Pike I was in Colorado. It's not different here. In rural routes they try to make sure they have coverage for a 10 minute response time, but this wasn't rural. The only logical reason for that long of a response is if the scene was judged to be unsafe, which it often is with gunshots, but the police should also have a short response time to clear the scene.
@Robert P Does beg the question though surely? Guy runs in wounded from a gunshot. You'd hope the staff kicked up enough to suggest the ambulance was needed urgently. Otherwise, if the paramedics are certain this guy is toast why bother at all? Then a follow up question: do USA districts have their own legislation over 'acceptable response times'? Anyway, 19 minutes is naff in a life threatening situation (could be anything, 19 minutes is plenty of time to die, do you think people are just hanging around thinking 'yeah, I've got 20 minutes in me no problem' then strike up a conversation about the weather?
@Lewis Lister Boo man. You get special treatment for unresponsive and not breathing. I appreciate where you're coming from; UK healthcare means if someone is less well than you, guess who gets the ambulance first? This 2 hrs plus thing isn't an accurate account of the whole UK ambulance service but is rooted in some truth I'll give you that.
@Umatsu Obossa deliberately slow? No. I would say the comments are pointing out that ambulances should be far more available and ready to deal with problems in any area. Rural areas excepted of course.
@Zei33 it takes longer to get to rural areas, they can just die? They have a limited number of ambulances, any number of which could be out on a call that very moment. You CANNOT make sure there's an ambulances just a few minutes from everywhere at all times, that's ridiculous. The INSTANT one was responding to this, that made the area it used to be in, no longer have one near it either.
@Seth Dixon you should do more research, we dont sympathize with the murderer, were just taking a point someone made and making sure it makes sense before we blindly get behind it like ants. 19 minutes in the city is normal, and I don't doubt they were going as fast as they could while also avoiding arriving before the police do, all they are told is that someone was shot and only EMT Officers of private communities are armed.
@Source everybody reading into my comment a little too deeply, geez. My point was simply, when you’re lying on the ground bleeding out from a gunshot 19 minutes is an agonizingly long time to wait. I’m not suggesting the ambulance stopped for donuts.
In my state as a tow truck driver if I do not get to a scene of an accident within 15 minutes I go to jail I get a $5,000 fine and my company gets a $50,000 fine
@Matt Pike my parents live pretty far out in the country. It's a good 20 minute response for ambulances out there. They've seen several car wrecks near their house and it always takes a while to respond.
Some of you guys haven’t worked a day as a first responder and it really shows. Sometimes we have only have 11 paramedics and 4 Medic One aid cars in the entire COUNTY. Sometimes, units that are available are on the other side of the county. So yes, sometimes it takes units a while to arrive. If you want to whine and complain about the response time, go ahead and apply to be a first responder, God knows we are understaffed and need more people. All the public does is whine and complain, without even knowing what actually goes on behind the scene.
@Seattle Washington seems like you agree that a 19 minute response time is terrible. Thanks for providing some insight as to why it might take so long. Doesn’t make it any less sucky for the guy bleeding out for twenty minutes.
@Metal Tao Yeah. In Britian here the ambulances are always on road. Not dispatched from the hospital. Theres ambulances all over the road,so there hopefully should be at least one available in the local area who can attend in less than 19 mins.
@Justice For Seth Rich WWG1WGA That's also correct. In Britain,ambulances cannot attend stabbing or shooting incidents unless police are already on scene, and have declared it safe.
@Umatsu Obossa it seemed to be about the abysmal time of the response in the situation of a gunshot victim. You attempting to imply that the commentor was making a stance that the ambulance responders had alterior motives is baseless and asinine.
@Michael Julian I worked in a larger city that also covered county (rural) and it’s taken me an hour to respond before. 19 minutes isn’t unheard of but obviously not the norm or ideal. I would imagine if transport medic wasn’t on scene at least fire or RRV would be there, and who knows how long it took PD to clear the scene
@Seth Dixon That's a very large leap in logic.... What does the ambulance response time have to do with the shooter? If anything the shooter would be way better off if the response time was faster and the guy lived because of it.
@Metal Tao ambulances do not go on "patrol" when you see them driving without their lights on it doesn't mean they're patrolling around like a cop would.
I had to call an ambulance the other day for a life threatening situation, the estimated time was 40 minutes and the hospital was only 2 minute drive away. They were just exceptionally busy that day
@Quynh Le You may think I am joking, but we have a special ambulance just for those calls. It has an extra wide stretcher and a winch to pull it into the truck. Google "Bariatric Ambulance"
Yeah, I was in a car wreck in Nashville and it took about 30 minutes for a response. Not a gun shot but still, too many people and not enough help or funding
@Common Sense Sports It's a Union Fire Department that runs EMS in Nashville. You get a ride to the hospital and that's about it. I work for a nearby department that is, in my opinion the best care you can get in the State.
@Ben Hardcastle my department receives less than one half of one percent of property tax revenues. By comparison, the school system takes 70% and we still have a fantastic budget. If anyone says they need to raise taxes to pay for good care they are lying.
@Metal Tao I don’t think ambulances patrol same goes for fire trucks and such. Police are usually first on the scene because they patrol and clear the scene for EMT and such
@Michael Julian Care wasn't bad and the people were extremely professional. Sounded like I was complaining but it was in response to what Seth said. Ambulances and police can't just appear because you need them to is what I was getting at
not rally doe thats kinda fast. depends on where it is aswell . wait the ambulance costs houndreds of dollars? oh ye aits super slow now when i think bout it
@Justice For Seth Rich WWG1WGA thats a problem in my opinion, in my country the abulance whould be there before police (obv if there uis a gang or smthng like that then they arent going in you know)
One good thing about state healthcare is that if you are dying someone won’t get their Christmas bonus when the paramedics fail to make their target response time of 3 minutes.
@Michael Julian Shooting incidents where shooter is still around?
0 likes
Jeremy White2021-06-01 04:48:33 (edited 2021-06-01 14:15:03 )
Welcome to the ghetto where people abuse emergency medical care and call am ambulance for their 3 day abdominal pain and stubbed toe, just to get a ride across town to the hospital and then leave ama because they feel better. Tying up resources for people that need it.
Is that bad? Emergency response is so bad in my area that I've had the police call me back an hour later when I tried to report an accident I was in and possible injuries. All parties took care of it ourselves and went about our business before 911 answerwd.....
Yes! And this happened at the fucking parking lot, there were people with cars, somebody could've brought him to hospital. This whole situation seems so stupid. Almost like everyone around just accepted the fact that this man is going to die.
But yeah, I wasn't there, so I guess (hope) there is a logical explanation.
@justanon Probably the fact that someone had a gun, he just got shot in the chest, it was their altercation, and the bystander effect. To be honest I think they're both stupid. Guy probably should've minded his own business but they also parked illegally. He also blind sided the guy but he was also screaming at the guys girlfriend. The other guy pushed drew a gun (fine) but then shot a man backing up who was no longer a threat. Pretty bad decisions from everyone
You should always go to the hospital yourself unless you have no choice but to wait for the ambulance. Emts rarely deal with extreme emergencies. Some (pointless) procedures/panic/lack of experience slows them down.
@Umatsu Obossa , the ambulances aren't stationed by the hospital. EMS stages all over the county to give as much even coverage as possible. Possibly a lot of other things were going on that day.
To be fair, I think a good amount of that time had to be spent waiting on the police. Ambulances can't just waltz on in to help someone who got shot, the police need to make sure that there's no chance anyone else gets shot.
Now should it have taken 19 minutes from the call to the ambulance to clearing the scene to then go help the guy? Probably not, it shouldn't really take 19 minutes to confirm that the "threat" only fired in "self defense" thus the scene is safe.
@Jason Blum And number 3. (imo as a basic EMT, not a paramedic) given that this guy was shot through both lungs and the [presumably] base of his heart, he probably wouldn't have survived even if he had gone directly into an ambulance. Is that a pretty fair assumption?
@mufason That's my guess. The prosecutor later says it was "the perfect shot" to kill the man. Through both lungs and the heart. I don't think he would have survived if he'd been shot like that inside a trauma center
@Two meals a day. Based on the description of the injuries, I can't see how he wouldn't have bled out, even if the paramedics could have gotten him right away. Both lungs and the heart. You don't come back from that kind of trauma unless he could have gotten to a level one or two trauma center within a few minutes, I would guess.
@Joshua Barker emtb here. Don't you think he would have probably died anyway, even if the ambulance had been there when it happened? I can't say I've ever heard of anyone surviving a shot through both lungs and the heart.
@Matt Pike they park ambulances everywhere. Look closely next time you drive around you might think they are napping but their job is to be called upon in hotspots in town
They would have just collected the corpse earlier in this case. With the projectile having gone through lungs and the heart, he might have died just mere seconds after getting shot.
Making your way through Clearwater is difficult. The Prosecutor indicated that the bullet pierced his Heart; even if the Rig had arrived in 2- minutes, the likelihood of him surviving is about. 0%.
@Robert P I am just spoiled on Phoenix response time, which is a few minutes. And also I am like "What could have prevented this?" about Marquis death. I assume everyone was doing their best. Everyone but the killer.
@Michael Julian my question to you is this? What would be the motivation for the paramedics to take their time? I guess I simply don't see the point. Is this comment section meant to say it's because he was black? I don't think they mention that on the calls do they? If so that's unfortunate and unforgivable imo
@Umatsu Obossa Here near Brisbane, it's actually quite common to see an ambulance on the prowl heading towards Ipswich, and in a few others near Brisbane. I more often hear them than see them.
@Umatsu Obossa I meant they don't have sirens on, so they may be just heading back to the office, but more often than not, they do go to emergencies. Sorry to confuse you.
@Anna Oddi You said you HEAR them more than you see them, so how is that they don't have sirens on? And most often they turn them off on the way to the hospital, even with a passenger on board.
Anyone saying this is normal for rural areas- this is clearwater Florida, not even close to rural. This is a big city, known for beaches and for being the headquarters of scientology. Theres a hospital right down the road from where this happened. My guess is that it took so long because of a combination of horrible traffic (it can easily take 10-20 minutes to drive right down the road in some parts of pinellas county) and a lesser priority for being in a "bad part of town". Clearwater has its shining facades for tourists but there are a lot of poor and poorly maintained areas. Cops like to take their time when it comes to a case likely involving poor people or addicts.
It really surprises me at the number of people in these comments who actually think ambulances can get there in mere minutes DURING AN ACTIVE SHOOTING, and that any minute passed where they don’t get the victim is somehow “deliberate” on their part for not getting there sooner.
Or that if you make mention of this, you’re “defending” the ignorant suspect. Do you all seriously lack basic critical thinking?
That is not how this works. That’s not how the protocol works. That’s not how they’re trained. REAL LIFE IS NOT LIKE THE MOVIES. They don’t get to just rush on the scene and everything magically be okay.
The emergency services knew it was an active shooting, but no paramedic — I repeat, NO PARAMEDIC — can enter the scene until it is safe. You all understand that, right?
When an active shooting is going on, they have to make sure the scene is secure and suspects apprehended before they can tend to the victim. That is protocol, no matter what your feelings are on the situation. It’s done that way so there isn’t anymore senseless deaths (and there have been towards paramedics who arrived on an active shooting scene that has also been killed by the suspect because they were trying to tend to the victim — THAT is what they want to prevent: more senseless deaths).
0 likes
B B2021-09-04 14:54:43 (edited 2021-09-04 15:06:28 )
@Lauren W It was a scene with an active shooter. Paramedic and first responders can’t enter an area during an active shooting until the scene is secured to prevent any more senseless deaths. This is basic common sense.
To also add: they have to secure the scene, make sure there are no any other suspects.
Do you know how many paramedics and first responders have been killed for tending to victims during an active shooter scene? Too many. This isn’t like tending to a heart attack victim or someone getting in a vehicular accident — there was an angry suspect who had shot someone during a hostile situation. They had to make sure the scene was clear with no other suspects or even any other victims in the vicinity that may have not been reported. They got there as soon as they could, point blank. Unless you are a first responder who has been in this situation, I don’t think it’s fair to bring up how close hospitals were during a situation like this. If anything, it’s disingenuous and makes it seem like you’re blaming the first responders more so than the shooter for doing this and causing an active shooter scene.
Way too many of you don’t bother looking into the protocols and go straight to blaming the people who spend their lives training and trying to help/save others because you think you could do better with 20/20 hindsight after the situation.
@Robert P - Good point. But I’m sure you know almost every commenter on here knows the whole story and everyone’s motivations and intentions. They wouldn’t be just talking out of their ass and slinging around judgements based on no evidence. No way, not YouTube commenters.
He wants as much sympathy as possible with that hand BS. You can really tell he has never been in a fight because being pushed down wouldn't leave you sore all over unless it's down some stairs or something
How is it they failed to charge the man right off when the one of the first things he says is a lie. He claims that he was hit from behind. Nowhere was he touched from behind. Even though she threw his firearm he paused as the man turned to walk away from him. You cannot shoot somebody who's retreating from you. That's murder. First thing he did was assumed Authority he didn't have by accosting the female, and taking up an aggressive stance towards her and this man's protecting his girlfriend. Which he had every right to do. This man started the altercation and then escalated it to murder.
People like Michael Drejka subconsciously assume that the law is on their side, which is why they have no fear of cooperating with the police in a self-incriminating manner. It's also why he feels there'll be no consequences to shooting someone as long as you cooperate and perform in the right way.
Even if you take a video of yourself killing an entire buses worth of people and show it to the police and give them the recording you absolutely do not talk to police without a lawyer present.
It's scary how trigger happy people are. Gonna be this way with Rittenhouse too. Provoking people, history of aggressive behavior, no attempt to retreat or diffuse situation (during first shooting) all caught on various videos on YouTube. It really, really ruins your chance of having a legitimate defense case.
@Nicholas Ramey No bs. I know people like him, grew up with some. They are all rough and tough with a gun playing super hero. But without they're scared little rats.
@Nicholas Ramey I read him like a book the moment he started talking to those cops man. Trust me I know him, with that gun he feels like a cop/military man/guard/security a HERO. Take that gun away he’s not approaching random strangers to tell them to move their cars I promise you. It’s like that for a lot of people not just him. They are so freaking rough and tough with a gun !
He was defending himself. Didnt you see the video? Its all good to push someone from behind while being in the wrong (meaning parking in the wrong spot). Ngga got what he deserves.
@Nicholas Ramey I agree. It escalated too quickly. I guess im more disappointed at judical system and the investigators who were actively trying to trip the man up into talking himself into trouble. I mean you cant say 'oh he WANTED to kill him' based on minute words or actions you can interpret many other ways... 'oh, he said ALMOST so he is definitely racist!'... etc. etc. Thats petty and not serious. The prosecution talk at the end... Man THAT was some serious speculative word sallad. They are basically manipulating emotions and facts. I mean you can play the video EVEN SLOWER to make it seem like the dude was a bad person, like he had million years to think... When in reality, when i saw tbe video the first time, wasnt biased or anything, nothing seemed off or bad. But when yiu slow it down you manipulate it to appeal to the jury... This is dirty. This is not law... Its some sort of game.
@Nicholas Ramey @sinkiy was right and the narrator even said it at 34:15 so maybe watch the full video and understand that white privilege does exist. And by pretending it doesn’t you are only adding to the problem. White privilege doesn’t mean you are rich or have a stable income. It means when you are a young innocent person walking down the street minding your own business you don’t feel as if you “match the description” or as a mother you won’t have to think this is the day my child won’t come home because of the people who were supposed to protect me. Don’t make assumptions about the black community just like you dont want sinkiy to make assumptions about this random guy. If you want to stay in your bliss ignorance than stay there but don’t tell people who have gone through such trauma from a young age that their issues don’t exist or their being overly dramatic because you don’t know how that could affect them and how ignoring the bigger issue just breeds hatred. I’m not saying that everyone in the black community is a saint because we are all human, I’m saying that we all matter. Sorry for such a rant I just had to get this off my chest because if reading all of these comments and for those who read the whole thing, thank you for reading this and I hope you have an amazing day. 😊
@Wize Wolf Well, you have to prove that it is. It is the burden of the prosecution to prove something like that beyond reasonable doubt. In my eyes its impossible. How can you prove a motif like that? You dont know what the person thinks or feels. I mean, just because the races of the murderer and the victim are different, it doesnt make it automatically a racial crime. A crime is a crime and i dont see how race can play into that. I mean, unless is its something like kkk march or something. I dont understand the whole hate crime subsection especially when used in neutral contexts like this one. I hope i was elaborste. English is not my first.
Same goes for, sexual orientations, disabilities and other minority groups. You cant project the motive onto the criminal, unless he himself CLEARLY states it in various ways. Breivik for example, had the whole manifesto written about the political party he opposes, and proudly motivated his actions. It was clear he was ultra nationalist right affiliate, extremist.
People throw the race thing around way too lightheartedly and with no clear grounds for that. It became a fad, and being called racist realy doesnt do anything because of that.
@Woodsaras although I agree it doesn't make it racial just because of the people involved you have to look at the situation as a whole. Down south. The man thought he was fine with berating a black woman with kids in the car. So he had no regard for who was present. He was quick to shoot the guy who was not advancing towards him. He acted very non chalant about what happened. Acted like the police would understand and it was no big deal. Faked his arm was hurt to garner sympathy that the black man was out of control and he had no choice but to out him down. His language he used to justify the shooting and once again showing no remorse.
He may have not be a racist. But instinct tells me he is. And just because I can't prove it doesn't mean he wasn't. And you can't prove he wasn't either.
@Wize Wolf Well, you cant incriminate people based on instinct, thats what im saying. Knowing that he previously had altercations with other people (where the gun was also involved, but not used) again, he may be just that kind of person. If we force categories on every crime then its absurd. Man killes his wife, then it means it was a sexist crime... lol... How about its JUST a simple, old school crime with no irrelevant addons? // Anyway, Lets not pretend that he wasnt pushed violently also. Its not hard to react impulsively in a situation like that. Its easy to judge for us and the jury when you can slow the video down, think for an hour about it, analyze, sitting warmly and safely in the security of our own houses, analyse the steps, when and where one was stepping all that jazz..... but in the reality of the moment its a whole different game. Im no lawyer but and dont know ALL the details, but based on the accents of this video i see a reasonable doubt. Im with the defence on this one. Listening to the prosecution at the end made me hate the judical system overall. Its an emotional theatre and a contest of "who frames the crimes better" not realy based on cold facts. Since, you can interpret facts as you wish like shown in the video, when the dude cries when talking about his dogs... the defence gonna frame it "oh, he's sympathetic and has a heart"; prosecution: "vile person! self pity!"... hence reducing a whole person/personality to a one-dimentional and ridiculous. unhuman degree... One accidental word BAM youre racist! Its ridiculous. Of course, prosecution framed it in the worst possible light not caring where the actual basis for that or not... I dont see why they put such a big emphasis on "remorse", or "feeling guilt"... you can see that in the comments under these type of videos also. What does it matter? Its stupid. It should be irrelevant at the very LEAST. If one thinks that a person cant be remorseful and try to avoid jail at the same time... he's very naive! Life is not some primitive tv soap opera. Imagine your disabled parent youve been caring for years just died... you can feel sad because you lost your parent, relieved/happy because a huge burden of caring for an old person is lifted from you, and now you will be able to start a new chapter of your life (hopeful!), maybe you can feel angry because, your parent actualy set you back consderably and you have no wife, was forced to have two jobs, which you hate in order to take care of him... you can also feel ashamed and angry at yourself for thoughts like these, because he is your godamn parent who took care of you when YOU needed it... etc. etc. etc. etc. All these emotions at the same time! Everchanging! And what the lowyers do.. they take only a small part of that whole personality, a small subset of what that person is, and feels... and highlights, blows it out of proportion to further their own cause/goal (to defend, to prosecute...) .... That why using stuff like that is very, very stupid and should be irrelevant. Yet, we always hear people preaching about criminals.
@Woodsaras I can tell that you're young/naive because you don't seem to realize that "tricking" you into "talking yourself into trouble" is the entire point of these kinds of interrogations. It's not something these cops just did to this one guy, it's what all cops do to all guys nationwide. It's all a build up to court, they'll use anything they can to secure a conviction
@privileged um, thats exactly what im saying. Hence in the process, their goal is not the objective truthseeking, its incriminating, bending every neutral fact towards their goal.... With a huge ass bias, thats why the situation is absurd. Ive read many psychological assesments of criminals... Man, that is sad. In stead lf being objective, those 'experts' give them, no chance! If youre being bad in prison - you're bad! If you're being good - you're just acting for some egoistical cause... Prejudical damning and judgement just jumps out of the paper. Seems like painting people and personalities in the worst possible light, giving no chance of redemption... not caring for the Actual, which is offten times unknowable. Im mean people in prisions are screwed big time. No ones interested in actualy rehabilitating them. Its all theatre. And wheather im young or naive thats deffinitely off topic. I see big difference between finding out whether one is guilty or not vs. finding ways for him to be as guilty as possible.... There's a lot of latter when there should be only the first one
@Woodsaras i don't know what you're saying.. the interrogation process isn't pretty but in these cases they get a ton of info out of questioning people & there are super clearly defined boundaries, that's why they're recorded to show that there wasn't any 'improper questioning' etc & you can always just not say anything to them.. I'm not sure what an alternative would be. But i mean yes every prosecutors office in the country is set up to secure convictions & a lot of them use this metric as their main goal while at work, which as you can see results in overzealously just throwing as many people as you can in jail for anything possible.
@Nicholas Ramey Absolutely i speculate he's racist, why else would he almost proudly admit he killed this black guy that he keeps describing as a 'thug' 'animal' etc? We can speculate on why that is all day but the point stands that if he was black & just killed a white kid he would be insane to try that which you already agreed to. Hell even if it was a white kid he killed, he would not have used those words & he probably wouldn't have been so "scared" as to shoot him as he walks away. You seriously think it would have went down the same way? Do you live in the same world as everyone else...?
@Nicholas Ramey did he tell the truth tho? He said his assailant took 3 steps towards him and we clearly saw he didn’t. (Well that’s what I saw I don’t know what your rose colored lenses perceived). You also said he owned up to his actions, well when confronted with the evidence that the events didn’t transpire the way he recounted he didn’t own up to his mistake instead he doubled down. So let me know where and when you saw a mature responsible adult being portrayed, I’ll wait.
@Woodsaras the split second decision to pull out his gun was a pure demonstration of intent. It was slowed down to get a better breakdown of what happened. But if you’ve ever been in a court you’d know the jury had probably seen the video a multiple times in real time as well as slowed down. The point is in a split second the plaintiff decided that being pushed to the ground after initiating the conflict that he was not going to tolerate that disrespect and made the decision to escalate the situation even further by withdrawing his weapon and shooting the defendant. If he had a moment of hesitation or the defendant even made a move towards him in a menacing way then his shooting would’ve been justified. But that was not the case and that measured the intent in the defendant. Even though he was in no imminent danger he still decided to shoot.
@cdskilla bro, im just too tired to argue with stupid people. i said what i wanted to say already. read more, read more thoroughly i dunno, some people cant be helped
the moment the victim backed off, the self defense case was dead. sure, he shouldn't have been pushed, that was uncalled for... but what was truly uncalled for was getting shot for it. The victim and his wife were being assholes, but the punishment for the crime of being an asshole isn't death.
"My upbringing,,, ' I'm a ranch kid, we own several firearms and never was I raised to have a pre-conceived opinion of any fellow human being based on their skin color or the language they speak. I'm disgusted by this guy, yeah, I own a gun too, it has a permit and I don't feel a need to carry it everyday since I was 22 and I don't have private parking lot I go play sheriff in. I DO have a disabled tag, and on days when I'm doing well, I don't use it, someone probably needs it more that day. I feel so sorry for this family that they had to encounter this concrete cowboy , these children had to watch their father die because some lunatic feels the need to personally enforce every state law and carry a gun "like a big boy."
If I came out of the store and someone was screaming at my wife like that, I would do the same thing. The guy didn't deserve to die for standing up for his wife.
Foolish! Both of these men overreacted to the entire situation.
Homie just had to confront whoever was parked there.. smh. And there was absolutely no need for the father to escalate the situation by shoving the guy to the ground.
When you live in a state like Florida, you gotta know what's up! In a "stand your ground" state, shoving someone like that could very likely lead to you taking your last breath.. When people like to shoot first then ask questions later, it leads to people losing their lives over trivial nonsense.
Some shit just isn't worth fighting/arguing over. I mean a damn parking spot! This man/father lost his life over a damn parking spot.
@clive henry I wouldn't say condone. He shouldn't have done it, but I understand. The video doesn't have audio, but considering what we know about the guy, what do you think he was saying? I imagine he was being quite threatening. Plus the woman was sitting in the car, he was standing there. It would have been obvious to the victim that this guy approached the vehicle to yell at her. They also weren't on equal ground. Even if we aren't conscious of it, we read someone sitting down as passive, when someone else is standing during a conversation. The standing person has a great advantage if an altercation becomes physical. Plus this was a total stranger. Put it all together, the man came across as a threat. Sure, the victim SHOULD have told the guy to back off first. But I think it's understandable if his instincts took over seeing a threat to his children, and their mother.
@ioiaxopanel I think Psychiatrist Evaluation? Like they do a physical one, a mental one, an emotional one... or probably theres only 2, physical and psych evaluation. I dont know, I've never took it but I think that's what it is meant.
@ioiaxopanel a psych evaluation is where a pyschiatrist/psychologist determines the person's mental state, like if they have any mental illnesses that could interfere with serving or if they have homicidal ideation or sociopathic tendencies. It's to weed out recruits whose mental state isn't stable enough to serve.
@Santiago oliva the problem with that is then u are creating a minority report calling people criminals when they haven’t committed a crime. So keeping someone from having a gun just cus they seem like a violent person but they never committed a violent act in their life would be a minority report
@Santiago oliva I have multiple guns I’m in the army and I use guns all the time guns has never been a problem of the US, criminals have. I understand if u can stop someone from committing a crime that’s a good thing I get it but when u categories a whole group of people as criminals and strip them of their rights just because they seem like they are high risk that’s a minority report now I’m not saying people with server metal illnesses should be allowed to own a gun I believe they shouldn’t I’m saying a psych eval isn’t a good way to keep guns from potential criminals especially if most criminals disregard the law in the first place and get guns illegally. Most gun crime is done with illegal weapons anyways. In California 99% of all gun crime is done with illegal weapons psych eval won’t keep criminals from committing crimes with guns
@Hermes oh and where do you get your fake stats? And do you really believe them? And are you delusional enough to think stats you cant fact check will convince anyone with more than 1 brain cell? I would go on but there are too many holes in what you say to care
2 likes
Santiago oliva2020-12-26 11:41:21 (edited 2020-12-26 11:44:26 )
@Hermes but let me blow your mind. That stat saying most crime is done by illegally obtained guns... where were those guns originally purchased? Look it up, that stat includes guns bought in one state, and sold in another, not from a black market or anything like that, but people you wouldnt normally label as criminals. Say ex army vets that were dishonorably discharged? LoL Brother, youre so far gone you cant see and thats cute
@Santiago oliva and hence the people who purchase weapons from them are getting them illegally all your doing is proving my point doesn’t matter if they get them 3rd party they are still getting them illegally plus most people who get illegal firearms are getting them made for them illegally most are not buying them 3rd party this makes it harder to track because there is no serial number attached to the gun because a factory never made it hence a ghost gun
@Hermes Human evolution and societies struggles have always stemmed from greed and hatred, both things synonymous with Gun and Gun violence, you not willing to hear people out even if thats not your experience is beyond saving, this VERY STUPID. like I said, whether you believe your nonsense or you know the problem and are a part/dont want to fix it, just shows your character.
@Hermes my Sweet Jesus, I was done with you honestly but now... So you sent a link to CDC which im sure you didnt even fully read, if you did then didnt understand, because it proves me more on the right than yourself. then you post a link to an opinion piece based on a REPUBLICAN rep from New york state that has since been voted out of office now that trump people arent the majority. last but not least you send a link to a sketchy PDF that wont even load... buddy, youre part of the problem whether you want to admit it or not
Joined the Marine Corps with depression and full spectrum ADHD, you'd have to be stark raving mad to fail a military psych eval, like 'straight jacket' crazy. The psych eval doc is basically your recruiter.
Santiago oliva you obviously don’t do your research. Once guns are gone there is always a spike in every other weapon category because if people want to kill they will find ways to kill.
@Hermes ah you think that being diagnosed with a mental illnes means automatically that you are violent and/or a criminal Or is that just how you see those with a mental illnes. Damn. I got diagnosed 7 separate times for being violent and/or a criminal then...
@Chris Brooks YOU cannot be serious, how many people are killed in gun accidents every year.eg, cleaning, hair triggers.......? "you sound authoritarian saying people don’t need power." ...really? ordinary people
may say they WANT power, only an authoritarian would claim he NEEDS power. I'll LEAVE IT TO YOU TO WORK OUT WHY YOUR 1ST STATEMENT IS EVEN MORE FALLACIOUS THAN THE OTHER TWO!
@Chris Brooks I would never ever bet my life on that... leaving a gun on a table loaded and cocked for a year also does not seem like a smart thing to do, but I get your point
This guy was such a turd man.. doing what he did was one thing and just downright horrible.. (while illegally parked in the middle of the street btw)…but the guy literally pulled a gun on 4 other occasions. Including an instance against a woman with two children.. this guy was out of control and an absolute freak.
Fascinating to watch this guy gleefully provide more and more damning facts against himself because he’s certain he did everything perfectly and that the cops are on his side. “Oh no he was further away than that, keep backing up.” “No I didn’t say a word to him and he didn’t say a word to me.”
In this case, as well as in the Michael Dunn case, it all starts with this class of people who think that they are entitled to break the law.
in this case it was the selfish woman who parked illegally (in a handicapped spot), and in the Michael Dunn story, the thugs blasting music in close proximity of others trying to mind their own lives, but can't due to these people who have NO place in civilized society. And, when others try to defend themselves, or try to ask the miscreants to stop breaking the law (i.e. illegal parking, illegal noise violation), they are the ones who end up in prison. Society in these here United States of America, has become unbearable over time, due to this unfortunate evolution of society into one where one particular class of people makes life miserable for others
@E Riv FR. Timmy is the kind of guy who would probably do the same thing as Mike and expect to be treated like a hero by the cops. Some ppl rlly need to have a reality check lmfao.
0 likes
Brian Bock2022-01-18 01:46:37 (edited 2022-01-18 01:55:27 )
@Vitorruy1 Well, the video told people everything they need to know. The interrogation just made all the defense arguments weak. I mean the defense actually told the jurors to discount the video because it wasn’t uncompressed, high definition television.
“If Mr. Draco hadn’t pulled a gun, what would have happened to him.” Uh… his feelings would be hurt, he’d have some bruises and feel humiliated, and he could have called the cops and have the other guy arrested for assault. Instead, he murdered a guy because he got hurt after confronting a woman in a car with her children. How would the same guy reacted if he found some black (or white) guy confronting his wife at their car containing his kids?
@Timmy Vawwter They both ended up in prison because they used a gun to settle a problem that if they hadn’t had a gun would have resulted in angry words. Both men were busy bodies who took matters into their own hands because they felt strong and brave because they had guns.
“I’ve never been in that situation before” Like he didn’t put himself in that situation.
10 likes
Eric 9992022-03-10 07:10:48 (edited 2022-03-10 07:37:26 )
Are detectives always on the side of the prosecution, even when the suspect's guilt is not certain? This question doesn't specifically relate to this case since there is video evidence and he is clearly guilty. But I'm just wondering since it seems like the detectives often assume the suspect is guilty and lead the questions in a way that will trick them into saying self-incriminating things. I feel like even an innocent person would fall victim to their clever tactics.
They dig towards what they suspect to be true in order to prove it. I think that in a more complicated case they would be pressing multiple people simultaneously.
I was fine up until the actual shooting. While yes his argument with the lady wasn't necessary, he wasn't doing much wrong when the father pushed him. At that point the man pulled his gun, in this scenario, i say it would be necessary. But only to get them away. By that point the father was backing up as soon as he saw the weapon as the video shows, he backed up, stood still and was shot or turned to his right and was shot. By that time there is no danger to the man, the father didn't have a gun, a knife, he was standing still, not advancing. He even backed up once he saw the gun. Originally i thought "Self defense". But the video, thankfully there was one, shows that self defense was taken a step too far and turned into murder.
Not murder, he could have had a gun and was turning to conceal his own draw. If he didn't want to get shot, he should have just stood there with hands up.
@Si74l0rd Stupid way to think, if you're getting kicked on the ground you are 100% clear to defend yourself with lethal force. People get killed all the time from getting kicked in the sides.
@Sweet Willy gotta agree with them though if I got shoved to the ground by an adult male and kicked around gonna do what it takes to stop that even if its lethal
@yuun paan I’m not exactly saying you’re wrong here, but I don’t entirely agree with that. I think being on the ground is a justifiable reason to feel threatened enough to defend yourself, and a somewhat justifiable reason to even fear for your life. But I think the lethality of being in that position comes from the possibility of being kicked, but instead from the possibility of getting your head stomped on. You can crush a person’s skull doing that. And even if it wasn’t enough to kill you, that kinda shit can induce seizures.
@PotawatomiThunderNew Yes absolutely being on the ground leaves you open to being stepped on the neck, they can kick your sides and puncture your lungs etc. But that still is only possible if they charge towards you. There is a gap they need to close to be able to do those things to do. He already had his gun aimed and pointed at the guy before the guy even stepped backwards. There was no aggressive movement. He was literally retreating before the shot was fired. He had time to meditate on the thought of shooting a retreating target. It was simply not logically or legally able to be considered self defense.
@Manly Man'yo Cheating is not a criminal offense. Beating the shit out of people is. Get yourself a divorce not your ex-wife (I'd assume by now) broken bones.
@Evan Brackney People have killed others plenty of times for far less than cheating before. So you definitely should be allowed to defend yourself whatever it may take. Especially because I would assume there would be a physical power imbalance as he's a dude and she's a woman. She likely didn't have any other option to defend herself other than a weapon.
@yuun paan this hypothetical and speaks volumes about your world perception as well as racial profiling. Were this a white woman shoving him, an obese mother perhaps, she would have the same capability but I doubt he'd shoot her. Studying forensic psyche, we have to perceive all angles of actions and behaviors (especially hypothetical) and figure out what was the turning point of escalation. Go back to school, bro. It's worth it.
@yuun paan don’t take my previous comment as me defending the guy. I was speaking generally. I think this guy was 100% in the wrong and I don’t think the situation called from him to even draw his gun, let alone fire it.
@PotawatomiThunderNew He 1000% was in the right to draw it. He was assaulted. Just shouldnt have fired till he was sure the attack was going to continue.
This has been seen before. The person who is in the wrong, threatening someone, is confronted by someone who is trying to "save" or protect the other person, and then the initial threatener shoots the savior, saying he was the one who was being attacked. Wow.
Why this guy felt the need to enforce parking over someone pulling into a handicap for a min or two idk. Not that serious & a life didn’t need to be loss. In the heat of the moment emotions take control not your mind if that makes sense. So both ppl acted out of anger without any thought
4 likes
Mark Anthony2022-03-17 22:52:56 (edited 2022-03-17 22:56:26 )
To assume a racial motive for an allegation of murder obviously amounts to a corruption of law enforcement proceedings. In reality there is absolutely no evidence of such a motive, according to the facts alone. To suggest otherwise is simply irrelevant; the psychologist who interviewed the defendant in prison, mentioning Al Sharpton hearing about the case, was clearly baiting therefore making a mockery of the US legal system. Besides this, the law of technicalities in potentially life or death situations is just overboard. I see people here say fights always happen and it's hardly ever assumed it should turn into a fatality, but the problem with that is: 1) unsuspected assault against an unknown person is not your classical, mouth to fists altercation between friends or acquaintances, in your everyday conventional human social settings. 2) In an environment of generally high rates of violent crime, it is reasonable to believe no manner of aggressive based assault can be deemed "safe" or non-dangerous by any stretch of the imagination. The wider issue here is why there is such high rates of violent crime in a society, altogether.
Imagine the shit he would do with the badge. He would be the most hated cop in the unit. Most corrupt as well, judging by his "wave the gun this is GTA" behavior.
Seemed like the moment he got pushed, he was thinking to himself "finally my moment has come" and shot that man to death.. sad really, what a snack stop at the gas station can turn into
Who the F has the right to shoot someone because their gf was parked in a handicapped spot. I hope this man gets what he deserves! No one gets to play God
20 years for manslaughter over a parking spot that you didn’t even need to use. Two major lessons here: don’t push people because you might get shot and killed. And don’t meddle in petty trivial matters that don’t concern you because you might serve 20 years of your life for absolutely no good reason. Stupid and avoidable.
I think they’ve explained that in some other videos, because yeah that kind of confuses me too. It comes from a guilty suspect trying to act innocent, because they feel requesting legal council will make them appear more guilty. So I actually think an innocent suspect might be more likely to request immediate legal council than a guilty one.
I swear I’m not grammar police, but the word is counsel, meaning advice :) A council is a large assembly of officials and it made me crack up, thinking of the guy requesting a whole panel of city representatives 😂😂😂 I was like, well that’s going a bit overboard hahaha. GODDAMIT OFFICER I WANT THE CITY MAYOR IN HERE AND THE WHOLE DAMN COMMITTEE, STAT, I KNOW MY RIGHTS
David Davis makes them seem guilty. It’s the cops way of manipulating the situation for sure. They don’t want him asking for legal council they wanna act like his friend
Sometimes they do, the police will say something like "yea we'll get a lawyer for you" and just keep talking to them and the suspect talks anyway. I'm not sure if that's entirely legal, but I've seen it so many times. Just saying "lawyer" doesn't make the interrogator throw up their hands and walk away. A lot of the time these people are either too trusting, too naive or too full of themselves to stay quiet.
If you request council I think they’ll hold you until you can get in touch with your attorney or you can clear a public defender qualification. Who knows how long that takes state to state? I think most people would rather just answer the questions and hopefully be let out until their court date
2 likes
David Davis2019-10-09 20:45:55 (edited 2019-10-09 20:46:34 )
Roodski true. They will just hold you until when and if bail is posted. But the way everything someone says is analyzed it would be the safest bet. When you’re swimming with sharks it’s safer to be in a cage.
Sparrow Cunningham it’s totally legal because the suspect is giving up information voluntarily. If he said I want a lawyer and shut ups afterwards but the cops try to force him to speak then it becomes legally questionable.
This so true they all snitch on themselves. One of Jim's previos videos had a snipped of people who knew their rights and even a crackhead told the police they don't know anything when he was accused and asked to leave, he got them to give him a coke before the interview haha
A self righteous feeling of doing no wrong, for some people asking for a lawyer admits guilt with reasoning like "why would I need a lawyer if I'm innocent?" A very naive thing when the cops who at first seem like your friends don't give a shit about anything but hoping to find you guilty in any way possible. They aren't there to help you no matter how "friendly" they seem, people don't seem to understand this.
JCS already showed at least one case explaining why the lawyer up thing is not always the best thing to do. I think one of the reasons is pretty clear: guilty people don't wanna look guilty. I'm pretty sure that also happens when innocent people are questioned, although I think those tend to exercise their right for legal counsel more often, especially if they think cops are trying to frame them for whatever reason. But here's the thing I don't understand: I see comments like this in a lot of JCS videos, and I don't understand why, since showing and explaining investigator's techniques designed to, among other things, prevent a suspect from asking for a lawyer is one of the main focus of every single video in this channel.
HOW would a lawyer help in this case? With the cops had the video of the shooting? ... When he fired that shot, that dumbass pretty much burned that "pleading the fifth" bridge.
Let's say that he claimed "i shot him in self-defense", then lawyered up right away, and say not one word to the cops.
With any reasonble jury, what do you think the verdict would be?
@Xiaomin L Feador A lawyers job is infinitely easier if you haven't just ratted on yourself to the cops, honestly I think this being Florida a good lawyer could have got him off even with the CCTV footage.
@kindgrinds Please explain to me, how would a lawyer explain away with CCTV footage, it shows that he shot the guy when that guy was down on the ground.
He doesn't cry during interview about taking the life of a man who was a son, husband, father, brother etc with zero remorse. It was 100% bigotry. If a white young woman had parked there and the same incident took place I guarantee 💯 he wouldn't have pulled his weapon nor even reacted in such disbelief
My second job is working for a call center for an outdoor retailer that sells firearms. Most of the customers I encounter are this man. They don't all kill, but they are horrendously racist. They demand "respect" but give none. They will try to guilt the hell out of you to get their way. I knew guns were a problem in America, but I did not see it for what it is until I had this job. These people are allowed to walk around with weapons with no training whatever and it is absolutely terrifying. I'm a moderate Republican and I do believe that people have a right to have firearms, but I believe it needs to heavily regulated and that people need to jump through hoops to get one. People would not believe the unspeakable things I hear and see every day.
Life Protip: Whenever you see someone parked in a handicap parking spot that they shouldn't be in, think to yourself "wow, what a c***" and keep on with your day like everyone else.
the fact that he shot while his victim was backing up too. then to lie about it and say he had been taking steps toward him
1 like
Chris Bwee2021-03-09 21:58:38 (edited 2021-03-25 00:16:17 )
The one thing I've learnt from these videos is if the police take you to a room and start asking you questions, say absolutely nothing until you've spoken to a lawyer, even if you're innocent.
Don't get me wrong, I'm very happy when criminals talk to the police and are arrogant enough to not shut their mouths, because it means more evidence for the police. However, ANY lawyer worth their salt will always, in any circumstance tell you to never talk to the police. Especially as an innocent person, you do not know how your words can be twisted to make it seems like you are guilty.
Alan Falleur2021-04-15 03:37:06 (edited 2021-04-15 03:41:08 )
It's not wise to say absolutely nothing because that leaves the person's intent unknown, therefore open to speculation by the courts. As silly as it might sound, what lawyers advise is to announce your intention to remain silent before remaining silent -- because then there's no room for interpretation. Even though that announcement isn't literally remaining silent. The 5th amendment is about abstaining from self-incrimination, not about trying to be #1 at the quiet game.
@Alan Falleur thats not true whatsoever. Silence is not an admission of guilt. “Beyond REASONABLE doubt” to get convicted. Cant do that without an admission of guilt or hard evidence. Silence means absolutely nothing.
I'd say especially if you're innocent, dont talk to the police. Their tactics really dont differentiate between guilty and innocent people, they're looking for a confession whether it's the truth or not.
Regardless of what anybody thinks about this guy, the lesson in this is that there are people out there that will kill you. Always avoid confrontation and de-escalate, it's not about who's right or wrong, it's about getting home safe.
I knew a father who was shot and killed because he argued with a neighbor over trash. TRASH. Just swallow your pride and walk away people... You can be right or dead right.
Man Hit the nail on the head i learned this valuable life lesson and realized its not worth loosing your life over pride. Ill be more than happy to take a walk if confronted but if u cross that line you will pay the fine.
@Think Tank Nobody is saying it was wrong, but acting as the handicap parking police is just begging for a confrontation like this... is it worth 20 years of your life?
@Fred Holtzclaw I know another crazy one A person from my town was killed on the street over a cigarette. Witnesses said that a weird dude approached him, asked him for a cigarette.. the guy didn't have one .. bam .. 5 stab wounds, 2 were lethal .. the ER that day was full of blood.. poor guy.
It’s about family values. If you come outside and there is an irate male outside your car with your partner and child in it, how much negotiation would you do? And how much negotiation did the murderer’s body language suggest?
That's sounds real good...Almost Disney like. Unfortunately life doesn't work that way. People just react to situations, often there's no thinking involved till afterwards. If a dude violated your women or kid in front of you for no reason.. Looked at you and said "What the f**k are you gonna do about it" You just gonna walk away and de-escalate? Some people's 1st thought might be to protect, and not "Are they gonna kill me? Lets de-escalate"
@jibba rich I wouldn't just straight up push him to the ground, but then again, I was raised to be a decent and lawfearing person. The automatic violence as a solution of conflict tells me that man wasn't.
@ZeuszO_O yikes, reminds me of the man who killed a father in front his wife and children tbhtbh
30 likes
Blue Team2020-12-29 02:19:32 (edited 2020-12-29 02:19:55 )
@Fred Holtzclaw That doesn't always work either bud. You can refine your sentance down to "Just stand there and hope for the best". Ever met a complete meathead that's as smart as pondslime? Or a level 69 karen? There is no walking away, there is no confrontation...there is only, "The storm" and whether, you can weather it...ha ha.
Would you people cop on and take all those guns out of your society. It has been proven, in countries where carrying weapons is illegal there are much less crimes involving firearms. Allowing any auld eejit carry a gun is a recipe for trouble.
Exactly, never push someone like that, they could have many different ways of striking back at you that are more deadly then that push.
10 likes
Blue Team2020-12-29 05:41:38 (edited 2020-12-29 05:42:11 )
@Tony Lawlor Ah yes like the UK, where im from... and the criminals still get them, it's just the every day people that can't get them (though we are barely allowed to defend with our fists now). Or germany? When will YOU people learn it's being done to basically control you? Oh that's right "MUH FEELIN'S!" People like you dude end up creating other people that fear guns or worship ithem, 2 extremes with no balance "Bbut-but-but-but muh fee fees! Im scared of big meanie boom stick so ban it!"
@who dis? I’m not American and senseless deaths like these are common outside of the US. People just don’t know how to articulate their frustrations properly that many lives get lost for no reason.
The guy still had 5 to 10 seconds to see that the father legit wasn't going to do anything after that push. He even raised his hands a little bit but this guy shot him.
@Camillo apparently this guy had 4 previous engagements where he pulled a gun on somebody before so I think he just saw an opportunity to shoot somebody and thought he would be justified
Yea really. After the push he had no option. If you push someone to the ground and they pull a gun on you then it’s going to be hard to justify any form of self defense legally
@staticoverlay "you can knock someone down and stomp on their head and kill them about as fast if you're bigger than them"
That comment makes it seem as if, you sound like someone who has watched too many action movies, and also has never been in a fight or think that people act like mannequins when they are getting beat up. lol I'm just saying that the COMMENT makes it seem like you think like that.
This observation should be on every video like this, as well as the observation that when you confront cops, remember that there's a gun in the mix, if you resist you're liable to get shot. I can't believe how popular it's been this year to resist arrest. The cop might be in the wrong & might face punishment if you resist & he shoots you, it happens, but that's no consolation to the dead. This world is too crazy to take any chances, people don't fight anymore, they'll just blow you away
Defending himself!? Guy was backing up as soon as the pistol came out, he wasn’t a threat any longer. That was a fucking murder, plain and simple. Hope buddy enjoys jail. 👍
Really going to come onto this video and talk about how it's the possible victim's fault? You're going to take the blame off a violent person's shoulder and sit it square with the person who's life is at risk.
@Fred Holtzclaw This is why Fawning is such a popular response to conflict, that being said I think it's interesting that its easier to buy a gun than a bullet proof vest,at least in Ohio anyways. Imagine if more people had bullet proof vests,so many people would have a higher chance surviving shooter encounters.
It's a shame he didnt apply his own standard of thinking to himself. Imagine having the gall to berate someone who was in a convenience store for 90 seconds and then shooting them because you were in way over your head
Apologize profusely and give him the finger while you are at home safe. As police always teaches people about road rage, avoiding any contact, not even eye contact.
@Think Tank It's really weird to me to think that some people watch that video and come away with that perspective.
I'm not a violent person, never been in a fight. But I'm not sure how I would react if I stepped out of a store to see a strange man screaming at my wife. A shove doesn't seem completely unreasonable to me. But putting a bullet through a man's heart as he is fleeing...
You are so correct! I cannot believe all the road rage murders that I read about! I mean someone will actually blow a bullet thru someone's heart for cutting them off... They will take a life, and spend the rest of their life in jail! Someone cuts me off I try to be cool, someone rides my ass I pullover let them pass... I do not have many issues.
@who dis? Particularly in the south in the US. It's a cultural remanent of the wild west. You can read more about it, there's a short wiki article on it, "culture of honor"
That is the sad reality of USA an their gun laws. We can argue here all day, in worst case there is a fist fight a nose broken, a few bruises no one is dead. Then again, I heard americans only feels safe if they armed to the teeth and they fight tooth and nail for the right to be, so I guess some of them at least deserves it. (to live and die like in a western movie) Beside that, never forget, whoever initiate the violence in an argument is the one who ran out of arguments. With other words if you can't justify your position with your words going violent won't justify it for you either.
I don't understand how people can act in such a dangerous way. Some ass hat tried to run me off the road once when I was on my bike just because I kept over taking him.
True. I used to aggressively drive in my twenties and pissed off a lot of people. I know realize I could have been killed by someone who was having a bad day. I now walk less aggressively and try no piss off anyone.
@ᴏғғɪᴄɪᴀʟᴋɪɴɢᴢ that’s why the reminder is good. That it’s not worth. Life may not be that way for you, but it makes me think twice before getting into a confrontation with people you don’t know
exactly... there was no physical altercation going on, the shooter was standing still arguing(which i can understand as it kinda annoys me too when people park on specially marked spots expecially when there are ton of other spots available), the kid was safe inside the car... the wife should been safe inside the car but then decided to get out of the car which could be seen as confrontational and then this guy comes and forcefully pushes the guy on the ground... not saying he deserved to get shot from it... but without that push if they would have just went back into the car and left... he would still be alive... you never know what other people are like so you should not needlessly start or escalate arguments with people... and never EVER turn things physical as you dont know how people will respond...
THIS. People in the USA in particular feel entitled to deadly force at some indignities that are easily dealt with by other means. I was in the Nextdoor app the other day and some “cowboy” started bragging about pumping people who touch his grass with lead, he kept going on and on about his right and he was twisting castle law, stand your ground and hot pursuit. Over and over this misunderstanding of exculpatory law caveats poses a MAJOR threat to the general populace. People twisting the law to suit their bias and preference. A total inability to deescalate or LEAVE stuns and chagrins me over and over.
@Jason Hendrick I’m not but what I’m saying is if someone shoved me onto the ground and keeps yelling at me and starts walking back towards me I’m not gonna just let him beat my ass. I’m not saying over an argument I’m saying if I was just waking down the street and someone just did it for no reason.
EXACTLY. I was raised by a sociopath (diagnosed) and there's an epidemic of guys trying to puff up to preserve their "manhood". Let me tell you right now. That dude never fought fair and you can't defend yourself against crazy. And you never know. You NEVER KNOW when the person you're getting froggy with is crazy. Take it easy out there guys and stay safe.
Bingo. Never know how crazy someone is or what they're packing. My main objective would be to just get out of the situation and live to see another day.
"Okay Handicap Parking spot police, you win." And leave it at that.
@Isam El-hussein don’t push people if you aren’t ready for any consequences. This is America where people have guns, even the criminals. This should have been on his mind.
@who dis? I was thinking the same thing. I live in a very violent country and getting shot it's not a normal social outcome XD. The normal extreme is usually a fist fight. I think what the victim did is still dumb but it didn't HAVE to end like that. So people... please don't normalize murder 🤦
Definitely, remember tough guys, you have no idea what the other is carrying.
I bet if the father knew the guy was carrying a gun, he wouldn’t have pushed him.
Remember, you don’t know what they are carrying, they could be some psycho that is armed or a coward with nothing arm him. It isn’t right, but it isn’t worth losing your life over.
The man who got shot didn't even need to touch the guy! This is America! All he had to do was approach looking upset / angry and shout get the fuck away from my wife - guy could've pulled his gun, shot and said "I felt threatened!" People shoot u in America for nothing.
@Jdb I turn my head to the East I don't see nobody by my side I turn my head to the West Still nobody in sight So I turn my head to the North Swallow that pill that they call pride The old me is dead and gone But the new me will be alright
Well shit I didn't know this song had that meaning on it
@CraftyF0X in gun free country's people are stabbed in the streets and bludgeoned to death run over with vehicles. They are not just given broken noses.
@kate carew it's not just about defending your self it's also defense against government taking over. Look at the communist country's where the government rules with an iron fist and citizens can do nothing but oblige or die
This comment is from a UK perspective; In the States there's a misconception I believe that a permit to own a firearm is a permit to murder in the mind of a sociopath, probably internationally but certainly Stateside because of the violent history and legislation or 'legitimacy' of permitted ownership of the 'right'.......
"Beta" HAHAHAHAHAAHA Sorry I just find it funny whenever someone tries to apply wolfpack theory to the human race. You do realise you're a human being right?, and you have the intelligence and emotional capacity to make decisions based off of THOUGHT and rational thinking, instead of some stupid "primal instinct" bullshit.
It's a toxic mentality and it breeds toxic behaviour, there's a reason people get made fun of for thinking like that.
@D Culican I'm trying to figure out what point you're making. You sound like you're saying something that affects what I said, but I know america has guns and that people get shot, that doesn't change anything??
Like... I'd be upset about the comment if it actually SAID anything, but you're just saying something that everyone knows like it changes something.
Genuinely not mad, just confused as heck as to what you're trying to say with that.
@D Culican Like legit, give me an explanation as to how what you said affects or changes what I said, 'cuz I'm not going backwards through the 190-something comments to find out that what your saying still doesn't make sense as an argument.
@Dopamine what do all those things have in common? They are tools used for cutting, transportation and general construction work.
A gun has one purpose and one purpose alone and it is to inflict as much damage to a human as possible over as long of a distance possible. You can't cut, screw, open or hammer with it anything.
I'm not arguing about your little gun rights which are stupid but work 99% of the time... The 1% of the time where they don't work, well kids in schools die and people on the streets die by the tens.
@Dopamine You do realize that you have to a be a "tiny bit more motivated " to bludgeon someone to death than just pulling a trigger. That is what NRA ppl seems to never grasp, the intent of killing can be there sure, but making it difficult instead of convinient might makes a huge difference. That is the main argument against automatic and semi-automatic rifles and high capacity mags. The damage what you can do in relation with the effort it takes to do it. Sure if you really want to kill you can kill without guns, but at least it is much harder, which means your victim may got a chance to survive or at least you can't just murder a crowd alone. Case in point, if the guy had a baseball bat in this instance he pulls out, the other guy backs off, situation deescalated. But he had a gun, so he pulls it off, other guy steps back, but since it is just the twich of a finger, and he is really mad, he shot the other one dead. The problem here as I see is that killing the other guy was just waaay too easy and convinient, and so in the heat of the moment he ended both of their life. I actually belive that he wasn't intended to kill the guy, but I also think he was like "Im gonna sting back to this madafaka" and since it was very simple and easy to strike back with deadly force that what happened.
@Think Tank no fuck no he yelling at his girlfriend with his kids inside the car he was protecting his family from some maniac. Plus the killer had time to sit up look at him and pull out his weapon while looking at him; if he was going to stomp him out he would have got on top of him immediately after pushing him down, but no he stop so don’t give me that shit about the killer being the victim.
@who dis? you right if this was the UK it would have ended right there, but unfortunately Americans have such quick access to weapons most arguments end in murder.
@ZeuszO_O so what the father was suppose to let him yell at his wife because this bully has a gun and is quick to shot anyone that dares stand up to him. Try this in shit in another country shit try this in the UK watch how fast you get folded. Because you don’t have easy access to a weapon.
The lesson to be learned from this is that there is no place for firearms in the public. Some Americans seem to get so indoctrinated into this culture that they can't see the forest for the trees. It's very similar to an indoctrinated Christian or Muslim in that they cannot understand the most basic arguments against what they believe to be true or right.
The fact that this dude thought he was in the right- Escalating the situation is always considered legally wrong- He was presented with non-lethal harm, and in return, escalated the situation and returned with lethal harm. That makes self defense a non-excuse.
@Tony Lawlor but those countries with no guns as you say, has high violence of knife attacks and other hand held weapons. Violence just gets up and close.
@Fred Holtzclaw yeah we say that then laugh at people who walk away. Or call a family member a puss for not stepping up. Human psychology runs deeper than that. Even tho he was killed it was primal instinct as a man to protect his girl and his children. The man that shot him should of left them alone.
@who dis? There are a huge amount of people in the U.S. who carry weapons who are itching to use them regardless of the situation. Our culture promotes violence in every “hero” movie, and underneath it all is a screwed up concept of what it means to “be a man”: bravado, confrontation, standing one’s ground. Supported by the NRA and politicians cuz, you know, there’s money in guns, war, civilians killing each other. One of the sickest aspects of our society.
@Tony Lawlor i wish but guns have been a part of america for a while... might as well be a deep part of our culture, really. gun control is the best we can do and even some people are STILL against that
@Moose Cannibal yeah, ok...remember that next time someone threatens your life. It's not ok to put your hands on people! And if you do, know that they have every right to fight back.
@James Brannigan as a women who doesn't want to be preyed upon while I'm out by myself, I have to disagree. I take great comfort in knowing I can protect myself if I need to.
@Moose Cannibal keep thinking people are playing with you or everyone have the same ideology/philosophies as you and you won’t like what comes with it. You can’t shove someone to the ground and the excuse is “he was protecting his family from a man arguing with his wife”.
@The Blue Rock yikes this is old, can you guys stop thinking this is relevant still?, I'm tired of seeing you guys go off about a conversation that hasn't been active in ages.
@The Blue Rock I'm a bit confused as to why you're asking about my day, not gonna share that, but yeah. I'm done commenting here, thanks for not continuing whatever debacle I got myself into.
@mortalkombatxvids The best line of action is not to startle the idiot with the gun bc even a single syllable could've startled him. You're trying to say that the dad should've risked his life trying to reason with the guy instead?
Yeah. Maybe don't start physical aggression in an argument and you won't risk getting shot. Keep it verbal all the time like a proper human being would do.
Wtf, i don't want to be paranoid everywhere i go, i'd rather fix the system that allows and respects lunatics who start confrontations just to fucking claim self defense by killing someone who pushed you away
@Blue Team in the UK it's completely illegal to defend yourself even with your fists for example if you have any martial arts training and fight back against an attacker the court will class your training as a "deadly weapon" and you'll do time. The only legal way to react is to call the police who won't turn up because they are too busy "patrolling" twitter for "mean comments"
@Kokujin Black why is that like an action move? It's happened loads of times in UK people killed on a night out in a fight over somthing petty. Someone gets knocked down and kicked in the head once or twice next thing they're dead or severe brain damage and the other blokes facing a lengthy prison sentence. Usually the person never intended to kill its almost always just a petty fight.
In real life most people will guard their head with their arms and curl into a ball because its a natural reflex when getting attacked on the ground. You dont see that kind of behavior much in movies. Its really hard to actually kill someone on accident, but then we would have to play semantics with the word accident when two individuals willingly engage in hand to hand combat.
@Kokujin Black it depends, as I've said it's happened a few times usually young lads drinking get into a fight no one is trying to kill but one ends up dead. Get punched and hit your head on the ground is all it can take.
@bobby ray of the family smith Where are these fights taking place at? I don't really understand in what situation do lads go out and drink with the intention of starting a fight or waiting for the chance to get in a fight. These lads going out for the night and getting in a fight sounds like something you see in a movie.
@Moose Cannibal if he fell a bit different and landed badly he would have been in a worse condition than a bruised back. So yeah, if he believed that he was going to be a threat to my life then I'd see it as fair
@Moose Cannibal it's threat against your life. That guy didn't push him over then back off, he stayed standing over him. That's how those things are normally viewed
@jibba rich Right answer: SOME. "What's going on? Oh, we are? OK, we should move then." That man would be alive if he knew how to use his words. Also, I didn't see any threatening body language from Drejka. I think walking up and knocking the guy down is threatening body language. Where, in this situation, was violence introduced? At what point? We both know the answer.
I honestly was ready to be on his side. Hate self entitled people...world is full of them. And to always resort to physical violence is never a good thing so yes, I thought this was justified. Until I heard that he literally had been involved in similar incidents a few times prior to this deadly confrontation. It’s like he was WANTING to confront someone and hopefully be assaulted so that he could pull that gun out and execute a person. So many wrongs on this one. All should be held accountable...the mom included. What an example she is setting for her children to not only show no regard to the disabled in our country...but to then throw an attitude when someone confronts her on her ride, self entitled behavior. All were in the wrong. Unfortunately, one paid the ultimate price. Is it so damn hard to just be a GOOD PERSON????? Last I looked...it’s FREE EVEN. People act like showing good manners and kindness cost dollars. Sad society.
Maybe if people weren't such violent messes then we wouldn't have fulcing homicides like this. (As in violent I mean fatal harming, aka gun shots, not little pushes)
He didn’t have to go up to the car. He didn’t have to pull out his gun. He started the confrontation he killed. Now he can take that 20 plus years for the rest of his life. On his knees with black eyes too
And there are countries, like mine for example, where there would have been a fight, a little blood flowing from the nose, some insults and that's it..... No gun.
@Looking 4 Things " Police are entitled to operate on private property, such as a parking lot, based on statutory requirements for things like sufficient handicapped parking ..." The above applies in all 50 states.
"Imagine" Being locked up in prison like Michael, minding your business, then....
An inmate stuffs a large metal object in his sock, and bashes Michael in the back of the head causeing 5 stitches to his cranium. And still looking forward to just 18 more years of this life! 🤣🤣🤣 I love happy endings!
28 likes
L X2022-03-03 09:14:32 (edited 2022-03-03 09:14:48 )
@Trumpty The Clown the happy ending is that the guy who illegally parks in handicapped spots and then assaults disabled people who tell him that's a scumbag move is dead, that's the best part of all of this
@Looking 4 Things As stores can require masks and call cops on non compliance issues, so can handicapped stalls be enforced. Sorry. Thanks for playing.
Casting aspersions about gender preference/sexual orientation of someone because they disagree with you on a subject. Pathetic. Name calling is always the go to rhetorical move when one can no longer defend their POV. LOL.
@Looking 4 Things : I've read several articles on the case and every mention of the handicap space made it out to be legitimate. Also, the victim shoved the eventual shooter into the ground, which if he didn't get shot would've gotten him jail time.
@Demagogue : please explain to me how parking in a handicap spot when not handicapped, and especially walking up and shoving someone to the ground with no warning for the crime of arguing (and would've gotten the guy a jail sentence) are "nothing wrong"?
@PinkOld what are you, a Canadian?!?! (I am, lol) When I was in Ireland, a guy says to me, "how do you get 20 drunken canadians out of your swimming pool?" ...i dunno, how? "Just ask one of them, 'hey man, do you guys mind getting out of my swimming pool?'"
I LOVE that that is OUR reputation across the pond
@Red Diver I'm sure your wife is thrilled to know that if you ever come out of a store and find some nosey stranger accosting her, that your first thoughts will be a)did my wife park illegally and b)"what if I step in and this guy's armed?!?!!?!? Better to let her deal with it alone..."
I don’t think you need to be a wannabe cop to get frustrated with someone who is illegally parked. I’m sure you get mad when you see someone parked in two or more parking spots.
@Tyler Godby "She was in a disabled parking spot, so I began harassing her, and her husband pushed me. Naturally I shot him and killed him. I was just holding her accountable!"
Imagine walking up to someone and putting your hands on them just because they are arguing with your lady friend. The shooter was in wrong, his life was not in danger and he’s an idiot, but he probably would not have even pulled the gun out had the other man out his hands on him.
@TheMidnightCaptain You see someone yelling at your wife and two kids, they have a gun. What do you do? Stay out of it? Walk over and begin politely debating the man with the gun?
@Sheryl Ferraro As with fire codes applying to private properties, handicapped parking stalls that are required by law are legally enforced. This was addressed in an earlier post.
@jaim haas I think you're referring to the Michael Dunn case. It's similar but Dunn shot and killed the victim through the car door. Same entitled attitude.
@TheMidnightCaptain And it wouldn't have happened if Drejka hadn't approached the car with a mom and her babies as the self appointed disability police.
@Sheryl Ferraro Drejka wasn't enforcing anything. He was verbally harassing a woman illegally parked in a handicapped stall. The woman's husband physically attacked Drejka. Drejka then shot his attacker. This is not a defense for Drejka.
Victoria Munoz2022-03-21 18:30:46 (edited 2022-03-21 18:45:08 )
@Looking 4 Things The Shooter would not have known it wasn't a legal Handicap Parking spot. He was functioning under the impression that it was. Legal or not, the idiot girl who parked there, didn't know if it was legal or not, either. Everybody in the scenario, in those moments, believed that it was. So, the EVENTUAL learning that it wasn't legal ( after the fact ) is irrelevant to the behaviors and actions of all these parties.
@Looking 4 Things Shoving someone to the ground in those circumstances, is NOT protecting your family. It's a thuggish, stupid and cowardly move. How protected is his family now with a dead Father??!! :-)
@Looking 4 Things Wouldn't people leaving water rings on tables at a party someone kindly invited them to, be an asshole? Obviously, if you didn't get basic common courtesy training in your family environment, it might be lucky if you had someone point out leaving water rings is not a nice thing to do.
@Victoria Munoz my comment was somewhat sarcastic. Going into the store and notifying the manager Would have been much more appropriate. Even had he just said "hey, did you know this is handicap parking?" But that is not what he did.
I was parking once at a Best Buy. The car in front of me opened a door and dumped out a bunch of trash. I brought it up like hey, that is not cool. We have one planet together. People got really mad. Even though I then drove away and parked at another business I still came out to find a severely keyed driver side door. It's not worth it. If I saw someone abuse and am mal, a child, or any person I would intervene. Hopefully that would not be life threatening to me.
@Sheryl Ferraro He's an instigator Sheryl. He isn't interested in finding common ground. He looks for people to fight argue and disagree with. Don't bother using your common sense with him, it's a waste of time.
@Looking 4 Things It's astonishing how many men on this feed don't have the innate protective instincts to protect their families.
So apparently you think men should agree that shoving someone who hasn't harmed you or yours is an appropriate action? You're confused: it's one thing to protect your family when there's an actual threat or harm occurring, but violently pushing someone who has not attacked you is something else entirely.
Just to be clear, I DON'T think Drejka was justified in shooting the man who pushed him either, and I do think the shooter should have been minding his business in the first place. But that is not ordinary behavior, to just run up on someone and shove them to the ground simply because they're arguing with your spouse. It's not only irrational and overly aggressive, it could be hazardous to your health.
@Mont Gomery You see someone yelling at your wife and two kids, they have a gun. What do you do?
I mean, a normal person would probably try to find out what's going on before getting physical when no one else has put their hands on anyone. Also, I really don't think he saw that he had a gun, because if he did he wouldn't have pulled up on him like that.
As a few other people have said, there are no winners here and all three of these characters did something terrible. It's actually almost comical how every subsequent thing is just worse than the last:
1. Parking in a handicap spot (which was believed at the time by all parties) is pretty shitty 2. Pushing a complete stranger to the ground when they haven't threatened or harmed you and when you aren't armed and you have no clue who they might be is indeed idiotic behavior, not to mention extra aggro. So that's worse than #1 3. Shooting someone who's just pushed you is not proportional unless they're actually further threatening you or you legit think your life's in danger and it's just stupid (from a legal standpoint) to shoot someone who's walking away and it's also pretty cowardly, esp. when you instigated the whole thing. And that's even worse than #2
@The Great Pumpkin don’t use logic on these people. They don’t take two seconds to think about the fact that he was attacked before he shot, regardless if it was a terrible shot to take.
No, this wouldn't have happened if this violent high school dropout didn't attack the man. Same thing happens here in Baltimore. He had no business touching that man.
Other man should not have shot though. Once the guy backs up from you, call the police and have him arrested for assault.
@Sancho Panza There was actually a whole chain of events leading up to this. Part of that includes one person pestering another about where they were parked. I don't get people who are that intrusive and antagonistic. I mean I get that it's shitty but the guy who got pushed was LARPING as security/police, and look where it got him.
@The Great Pumpkin it gets tiring seeing people escalate to violence over words. There's nothing that can be said that justifies attacking someone over.
I made it clear the guy should not been shot, but until the shooter shot him, the shooter did nothing wrong.
@Sancho Panza it gets tiring seeing people escalate to violence over words. There's nothing that can be said that justifies attacking someone over.
At no point did I ever say the initial attack (the pushing) was justified. In fact I was very surprised when seeing this the first time and the guy just ran up and pushed Drejka to the ground. My only point was that Drejka did put himself in the position where things could have escalated (which they did) by accosting someone and basically being a male Karen, and he likely only did it because the weapon he was carrying clearly emboldened him to do so. Even one of the interrogators alluded to this at one point. I also made it clear I don't think he should have been pushed, but nonetheless Drejka ultimately inserted himself into that entire conflict.
Just like the guy who pushed him was incredibly reckless while acting out of proportion to the situation, the shooter reacted the same way when he shot the guy who wasn't even attacking him any longer. It seems we agree on that. But I'm also saying that Drejka acted without thinking or caring about the consequences before the push. Just like you don't run up and shove someone to the ground because you never know how they'll respond (among other things), you also probably shouldn't try to LARP as security because you never know how others will respond. Both men took a huge risk, albeit in different ways, and while I'm still not saying the physical attack was warranted, it was still a risk the shooter took and he evidently has a history of altercations like this. All because he's armed, entitled, and likely itching to shoot someone. Like I said, there are no winners here but Drejka inserted himself into someone else's life and it bit him because now he's in jail.
@Sancho Panza I made it clear the guy should not been shot, but until the shooter shot him, the shooter did nothing wrong.
This is where we disagree. How can you say the shooter did nothing wrong? It is not his job or responsibility to enforce parking restrictions. If it really bothered him his best course of action would have been to inform management inside the establishment or I suppose he could have reported it to police or something. But he took matters into his own hands for some reason. Like I said, while I personally don't think people should park in handicap spaces (which I think it came out later that this may not have even been the case), I also cannot understand what would drive a person to be so brazen and reckless as to confront another person over it. You have no idea what their situation is or who they are, or how they will respond. It's mostly just not worth the trouble.
@Sancho Panza The shooter had no qualifications to be approaching another vehicle for any such violation. If it upset the shooter for any reason the only action the shooter should have taken was to call 911 to report it The shooter shot a man for pushing him, after the victim witnessed him antagonizing his family which included 2 babies. What TF is wrong with you?!
@Looking 4 Things I think the problem is that they are missing a fundamental understanding of how the real world works honestly. It's like trying to explain that the sky is blue to a blind person, until they actually go out and experience things, they're not going to understand. Clearly, anybody with common sense would say that shoving somebody does not warrant getting shot and killed for it. Was shoving somebody a good or smart thing to do right off of the bat? Probably not. Also, we can't tell with the footage how loud the argument was, so the father was probably spooked with having a random man arguing with his wife with his children in the same car as well. It's also a ridiculous thing to be heated about in the first place, no matter what anybody says. But it obviously doesn't warrant getting killed over it. Anybody who disagrees either needs to go outside more or are intentionally being hard headed. (I feel like the people who argue about it are confused because they have to actually use their brain for something instead of having a perfect, clear cut answer in front of them)
Markeis McGlockton was wrong to puch Michael Drejka, and Michael was SO wrong to shoot Markeis. Michael's life was not threatened, the guy didn't wanna kill Michael, he just wanted to get Micheal away from his girlfriend. Well, yes, the way that he did it was immature and irrational, but it didn't in any way justify Michael killing him. I will never understand the people justifying Michael's actions. I don't know if they realize that a man lost his life because this other man was stupid.
Imagine being so petty and unthoughtful of the elderly that you park in a handicapped spot with multiple open spaces right next to you which could be taken by the time an elderly person comes along while you are parked there intentionally forcing them to park somewhere far away or in tight spots.
Imagine being so violent and overprotective that you shove someone you don't know from behind just because you hear an altercation that you know nothing about and don't like it.
Yes, everyone involved made dumb decisions that could've stopped this tragedy from happening if they were just a bit more thoughtful and respectful.💯💯💯🤦♂️
@PinkOld Dont be such a spoiled brat that you think simply holding someone accountable and standing up for the elderly is wrong. If her disabled grandmother had to be forced into parking somewhere far away or in tight spaces that then caused her grandma to struggle or even suffer, then both the woman and her boyfriend would flip out that someone took a spot meant for people like her disabled grandmother and caused her grief, which is called being a hypocrite and petty.💯💯
It is quite amazing to me the number of people going to astronomical lengths to justify this sorry excuse for a human being. Equating parking in a handicap spot (a pretty crappy thing to do tbf), & shoving a man harassing your wife who has your small child with her (a hasty, yet understandable response) to murdering someone for little to no reason is disgusting. I wonder if the victim's behavior would've been considered wrong & "thuggish" had he been a white man protecting his white wife & kids? To act like "illegal" parking & a shove is equivalent to whipping out your gun & murdering someone that didn't warrant that level of hostility is a very vile thing to do.
There are plenty of people like that all around the world, unfortunatly. My dad has an handicap and owns the right to park in said spots. There are always people looking for the handicapped logo.
@Tyler Godby Fair enough, just so long as people don't take the law into their own hands when we have trained professionals for that very reason. I have no problem with people trying to call out illegal activity, hell, wish more people did.
@PinkOld Exactly. As a disabled person, I find that the Karens of all genders are far worse than those who aren't. I rather someone stand up for their spouse and children, but it's a damn shame it ended like it did in this situation.
@Japheth Grimm It really was terrible that it ended as it did. I'm sure that the man who got shot would have done it differently if he had a second chance, but Michael Drejka made that impossible because he couldn't abide by the basic rules of self-defense.
What blows my mind is how 3 things could have been done to have this never occurred: the couple don't park in handicap space. Michael minds his own business and ignores that that they are in handicap space. The victim sees Michael arguing with his girlfriend and doesn't shove him.
@Tyler Godby there’s holding someone accountable for their actions (check out cart narcs) and then there’s murder. He pulled out his gun, the victim clearly backed away, the suspects ground was hell and yet he fired anyway. This was murder.
It’s not because he reacted unreasonably to being assaulted that he was in the wrong for holding the woman accountable for her actions. The way the woman parked in a handicapped spot, reacted to being called out and how her husband reacted to the situation shows their family’s self entitlement. They only think of themselves and couldn’t care less about others. Yes, this man was in the wrong for the way he unreasonably used deadly force, but had he acted reasonably, I guarantee this family would be the ones looking like the villains.
@SuperSora except he wasn't randomly shoving people he heard this man loudly arguing with his wife for parking in a handicapped spot that wasn't even legally installed
I found it odd that no one brought up the fact that he had said he had just been at the WAWA down the road and obviously only pulled in as he was passing by because he saw someone parked in the disabled spot and he wanted to make sure they were actually disabled! He literally said that “IT HAPPENS EVERYDAY”. I can’t say that I he got the true charge of the situation. He clearly stopped to confront the person in the disabled spot knowing he could “defend” himself(which to him means “shoot to kill” and not “shoot in the foot/leg”) That entire situation was premeditated and it’s crazy they can’t ever try to charge these disgusting things correctly when they kill people and end someone’s life because here in Florida, they ALWAYS get off if they are white. I’m speaking as a 41 year old white female who has lived in Florida for 41 years and every year there’s someone who is more than clearly guilty yet somehow gets off!!! It’s maddening!
@Tyler Godby that's one of the main things wrong with society today, people do what they want and if someone correctly corrects them they just go "mind your own business". That's why people put their feet on bus seats other people have to sit on, don't get up for elderly people or pregnant women, jump the queue, park in handicapped only parking spaces etc etc
@PinkOld The man who got shot couldn't abide by the basic rules of decent human behaviour and respect for each other. So couldn't his wife, obviously. I'm not at all defending the shooting, it was an extrem and terrible overreaction. But let's be real here. The man would have shoved some other dude to the ground sooner or later. Or attacked a police officer, because he was arguing with his wife (which would have continued to park in disabled parking spots), which would have also ended with him being shot. It then would have been yet another case of "racist blue man killed innocent black man for no reason". You can't just physically attack someone out of the blue. Even if your loved ones are in an argument. This is not how normal humans behave. Behave like trash, get handled like trash.
It's not that , it is the principal of the matter , some people just want to do wrong , if they didn't park on a disabled parking this wouldn't have happened , the wrong doings of a certain culture that don't care to brake the rules is causing friction amongst cultures that do obey the law and that piss them off .
@Looking 4 Things no , it wouldn't have happened if the woman didn't park on a illegal parking , go to the root of the problem , don't start looking for the problem in the middle , some cultures are known for braking laws , that pisses off those that do care about law
@TheMidnightCaptain I grew up with five brothers if I was that mother and any of my five brothers were to see that bully harassing me, he wouldn't have the time to reach for his gun. Midnight Captain I'm safer with brothers thank you very much.
@Looking 4 Things thanks for telling me , you deserve a Noddy badge , English is my second language and I'm writing fast because I haven't got time to waist on you .
@CHRISTO BOSMAN I can appreciate that. By the way, it's "waste on you". not "waist" If you're going to tell me to go back to school you should be aware of your own shortcomings. Be well.
Yeah really weird to get in a full fledge screaming match with a stranger for parking where they shouldn’t though it really had nothing to do with him. 😬🙄
@Looking 4 Things As with fire codes, designated handicapped stalls are indeed, within the purview of city and township regulations. Do your homework.
0 likes
Red Diver2022-05-04 09:07:35 (edited 2022-05-04 09:09:12 )
@rand0mn33ss As with many murders, the victims are often the more aggressive initiators of violence. As was the case here. This is not a defense for Drejka. But it is inaccurate to say that the victim was innocent.
@Tyler Godby I have never in my life checked the license plates in the handicapped spots. Who the hell does that? That's not holding somebody accountable, that is instigating.
@SuperSora Drejka's actions towards the family before he shot the father could have been considered harassment.
The important thing to note is the series of escalation. The family had parked in a handicapped spot, Drejka harassed the family for it, the father assaulted Drejka, at this point Drejka would have been the victim and he could have even pressed charges for assault if he wanted to. The moment Drejka pulled out his firearm he was no longer the victim.
@Toomany Francis how does shooting his assailant change the fact that he was a victim of assault? Also what he did was in no way harassment, annoying maybe but still miles away from harassment.
@Tyler Godby He wasn't hired by the gas station and there were spots open much closer, it's not his place to hold anyone accountable. He was playing citizen tough guy over handicapped parking spots and took a father of 4 away from their family over that. This shit shouldn't even be a debate, it's pathetic that it is.
@Red Diver First mistake: Cosplaying as the handicap placard inspector Second mistake: Thinking any kind of physical provocation give you the right to respond with deadly force
@SuperSora "non of this would have happened if the man didn't assault him for no reason." He was yelling at and threatening his wife while his small children were in the backseat. Try to pay attention.
@Herbert West I payed attention. It's not illegal to tell someone that is illegally parked that they are not allowed to park there. Maybe you should try and pay attention to the law.
First mistake, illegally parking in handicap stall. Second mistake, physically assaulting someone that calls you out on it (that turns out to be a gun carrying nutcase).
@Trumpty The Clown To be fair I think the guy was very dumb and careless but not malicious. I think he deserves some punishment but maybe not what he's going through rn...
Michael Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison on October 10, 2019. He was also seriously beaten in prison in february 2020. He has no possibility of parole and he will be out when he is 67 years old.
@Vilimir 40 years for this would be a medieval sentence. 20 years no parole is a pretty hardcore sentence given it wasn’t planned it was just a dumb gun nut itching to use what he’s learned in gun club. The fact he’s been severely beaten, again, medieval. I mean, what’s the point in a massive sentence? He’s very unlikely to do it again. The US justice system snd it’s rapey/gang prisons seems very spiteful rather than rehabilitative.
@rafer Jefferson iii I think they could banish him to the neighboring village. Like in early middle ages. Mayby to yours my dear friend with stone age
moral system.
@rafer Jefferson iii I mean He took someone’s life, he could have a good 30 years of life left at 67, kind of seems fair to have him rot for what’s left of his
@rafer Jefferson iii Three kids, have no father. and watched him get shot and killed.... He had a history of starting conflicts, WITH a firearm included. He had no remorse about the a life lost, AND at his hands...NOR for the 3 kids who have no father....
@rafer Jefferson iii And lets not forget who initiated the whole situation. He coulda just gone ahead and filled his car up and left. But naw. Dude is a self-appointed parking guard out looking for trouble.
29 likes
Rosa Lind2022-01-11 16:20:11 (edited 2022-01-11 16:20:37 )
@rafer Jefferson iii I've been to a islamic country. I've been to the states, twice. But I live in Sweden. You ain't need to sell me on how either of the two former justice systems are fudged.
But I ask again: what's the correlation between an american shooting another american, a sentence passed in an american court - and islamic law? I fail to see the relevance. Why not just call it american law as that is what it is and islam is not involved in any way, shape or form?
@Rosa Lind That’s not logical. Why would comparing US justice (which I’m stating I find draconian and vengeful) with another form of governance which is de facto draconian and vengeful be racist? I think you’re trying really, really hard to make it about racism. Perhaps you feel any negative connection to Islam is a form of racism, snd we have a duty to ignore it. If you’re a Swedish liberal then that’s probably explaining that. Another point is that Islam is a religious and political doctrine and not a race. Unless you’re trying to say that the Islamic republic of Iran has the same racial makeup as Jordan, or Egypt, for example.
@rafer Jefferson iii So you are saying if he had gotten 15 years all would be well and good. But 20 is akin to amputation of a hand?
I understand how one could make a comment like your first one about islamic law in an offhand way. But you still think it's a viable comparison? Even though they're not connected in any way and the american justice system is notorious in the whole world for being a piece of shit?
You went for a cheap point. It wasn't there. Now can we speak about why a 20 years sentence is barbaric when the defendant shot someone dead basically in cold blood and still considers himself the victim to this day?
@Rosa Lind he didn’t though, did he? He didn’t walk out the house and shoot someone in cold blood. Are you forgetting the part when the guy came and pushed him to the ground? I wonder if the fact you’ve already brought up racism where none existed, that the colour of the perpetrator and victim is adding an element to this. People molest children and get lighter sentences. If that guy hadn’t pushed him, he would be alive. It is NOT the case he’s gone out and murdered someone in cold blood. This man deserves a long sentence, but sentencing in general in the states is very harsh compared to European countries. I would imagine in U.K. you would have got life, out on licence after 12-14 years which I feel is about right.
@rafer Jefferson iii And bro, stop assigning me a motive and assuming my life story cause you've read some funky politically motivated attack piece on our immigration policies or supposed no-go zones or whatever.
It doesn't bother me in the slightest, but you're holding yourself back because you won't be able to understand what people are telling you if you continue to view us as caricatures.
@Rosa Lind Caricature is being kind. We have race baiting liberals in this country too and I’m not interested in finding consensus as I don’t think I can learn anything from you. You shoehorned racism in at the earliest point and didn’t really make a good explanation for it. I can only conclude it’s the same kind of name calling, finger wagging real politik we see from the left here and I have no interest in forming alliances with ideologues.
@rafer Jefferson iii "The shooting happened after McGlockton and his 5-year-old son went into the convenience store, leaving a car that was improperly parked in a spot designated for people with disabilities. Drejka confronted McGlockton’s girlfriend, Brittany Jacobs, and shouted at her about being parked in the spot.
A witness, concerned about Jacobs’ safety, went into the store and told a clerk, according to Wednesday’s ruling. McGlockton heard the witness, went outside and pushed Drejka to the ground."
@rafer Jefferson iii No. I mean, yes, I am logical. It's a shitty comparison you're making. Islam literally has nothing to do with this. You're basically changing the conversation from why the punishment is medieval to what's wrong with Islamic law. I shit on religions any day of the week but I still don't muddle a completely unrelated topic with weirdly passive-aggressive comments about catholicism or whatever. It doesn't make sense to describe the ACTUAL way the american justice system works with how you perceive "islamic justice" to work. The only reason to compare them is to take a dig at islam. And you said it yourself that muslim nations differ greatly. So that's another point deducted.
And yes, I'm a swede. But bro. Why are you automatically assuming you know my life story because of what some foreign press has reported on Sweden?
And why are you assigning me a motive and life story because you think you've guessed my political views? Like, do you generally have good conversations and gain new insight like this?
You're acting like you have all the answers and can't be bothered with people who don't agree. It's ridiculous.
@rafer Jefferson iii "Two involved allegations of Drejka showing a gun. In another, a trooper accused him of aggressive driving and cited him after a crash when Drejka braked hard in front of a woman driving with two children."
@Rosa Lind There are lots of positives in Islam like anything else. “Islamic justice” as a way to deride a harsh prison sentence to me doesn’t seem edgy, it’s descriptive. I’ll apologise provided you do the same for accusing me of racism.
@rafer Jefferson iii Right, for me prison is not for punishment, like forbid your kids candy for a week when they behaved wrong. It has the reason to protect others from dangerous people. A serial killer should locked up forever. He will remain a threat. A guy like this has leant his lesson and is not a threat to society. Be honest guys, with whom you’d rather share a bedroom for a night: this guy or Manson?
@WHITEB0NE as much as this guy sucks so bad, that really made me sad. Thinking more about the dogs, like the dogs don’t know why he’s gone, they just know that he is. Great now I’m crying. Thanks for that lol
@BrunoFC did everyone miss the part where the guy pushed him to the ground? The way you speak about it, it’s like he’s a serial killer looking for victims. If you pushed someone over would you expect retaliation? Why are we framing this as an innocent man being murdered for no reason. If he hadn’t immediately sprung to violence over a minor disagreement he would still be alive. Hence I don’t believe this guy would be out shooting people, only if they assaulted him
Damn. Who would've thought that Drejka would be victimised in prison? He's such a smooth-talkin' military man, I thought it'd take half a platoon of marines to bring him down.
@rafer Jefferson iii Great argument. Why not just release him and let him live next to you, while you're raising your black kids. I'm sure you'd feel safe.
@jougetsu imagine if you’d said that the other way around for a black murderer. So that’s what this is about. Its not a man who shot another man. Its racism, of course.
@rafer Jefferson iii you are delusional if you think he was justified in doing what he did. as he said himself, he was not prepared for a fight, he knew that there was a good chance his actions would produce an altercation, and he only approached the car because he knew he was protected by his firearm. yes he should not have been shoved to the ground, yes he was justified in drawing his weapon, but thats it.
@rafer Jefferson iii Let me get this straight. You see a complete stranger harassing your wife and children and you just ask him what’s up? And you think murdering someone is a justified response to… being pushed over? He initiated this confrontation, and deserved to be pushed away. What kinda sensitive little soy-boy cant take a shove after picking a fight?
@BrunoFC yes. If he’s just talking to my wife and child, yes, I don’t walk up to them and push them to the ground. I doubt you would either, but you’re going to play like it’s a reasonable reaction. This is all tied up with race, I can see why this is a pointless discussion because whatever analysis you make, you’ll say that resisting arrest or pushing people Over in the street is justified. If the victim was a white guy you’d say he got what he deserved.
@Slowa rim I think the medieval way would withdraw his gun permit and let him get beat up hardcore every time in this until he learns his lesson of minding his own business
@Natlee Yes propably. I"m sorry but as an european I''am a little bit sceptical about this whole puting in sombody half of a magazine because he push me thing. But do what you want.
@BrunoFC it’s drawing attention to a double standard and hypocritical position. You can write it in upper and lower case, as a dog whistle to similarly childish and obsessive CRT advocates, but that merely underlines the ill thought through groupthink position to which you subscribe and the accusation of racism is just a stock response when you can’t win an argument and therefore resort to mockery and accusation. You’re even making things up. There was nothing said by the defendant which suggests he shot him because it was a black man, you’ve invented that because it suits you. You’ve also mischaracterised assault as “defending his family” You do not meet a verbal altercation with pushing people over, that is not a reasonable reaction, you know this, but seek to minimise it because you’ve got a prejudiced position and can’t judge the victims contributing actions without the racial narrative wrapped around it. I prefer to judge both the victim and perpetrator by their actions, and not their skin colour. If I saw my wife arguing with someone, and I immediately assaulted that person I wouldn’t be surprised if they retaliated. Drejka is guilty of murder; simple, but he wasn’t walking around trying to execute Black people because they were black, no matter how much you want that to be true.
@rafer Jefferson iii I’m gonna go ahead and ignore everything you said due to the fact that it’s not a double standard. You are simply adamant that I would treat the situation differently when in reality I told you I wouldn’t. you just can’t accept that a white man being so intimidated by a black man pushing him that he killed them over it.
@Shotty what difference would 20 or 15 years make? I think many of you are just plain weird in not mentioning or discussing the part where he pushed him over and seem to think that’s reasonable and OK. Really weird.
@rafer Jefferson iii bro. I don't think some people understood what you mean. Sad you had a debate some random over Islamic system. When you never mention such thing. You had my like Champ. You have some very good points. 👍
@rafer Jefferson iii You have some issues man. Yea the shove was an overreaction. But Drejka diffused the situation the moment he pulled out the gun. You can see the dude clearly stop and back up and Drejka is dead focused on him knowing exactly what is happening. And yet he still decides to shoot him dead in the chest as the man is backing away.
It blows my mind you are more sympathetic to the man who literally killed an unarmed man as he was backing away, than you are to the man who shoved someone after a loud and aggressive shouting match outside with your partner over nothing.
Drejka was the aggressor from the very beginning, he went out of his way to not only engage the verbal confrontation, but also use deadly force when he got a scraped elbow. He admitted that he didnt feel physically endangered because of the sole fact the he was armed. In the video you can actually see that after the initial shove the other man was already leaving a fair gap between them and likely wasnt going to engage further even if Drejka didnt pull out a gun.
Give this guy 40 years for widowing a mother and leaving 3 kids fatherless. He didnt feel in danger from the beginning and he admits that. He had 0 reason to use deadly force and if that's the type of person you want as your neighbor that's fine, but keep those crazy trigger happy nut jobs away from my town
@MusicAmore you’ve misunderstood, I’ve been clear:
Drejka is guilty of murder Drejka deserves a long sentence (I just find US sentences are draconian and 15 years inside is about what you get in England for murder, I don’t see why you need 20,30 or 40 year terms, just seems cruel and unusual) The sentence shouldn’t be so the family can get revenge. The victim didn’t deserve to die for pushing someone.
What I also said:
Drejka didn’t go out executing a black man. He was provoked and over reacted. You had people saying he went out executing people. He didn’t, if the dude didn’t start a fight with him, he would have never shot him.
I don’t like Drejka, he’s a gun nut douche.
I also think it’s US gun culture and gun obsession which causes this, he was full of terms like “force multiplier” and all these things like “his hips moved”, It’s another death entirely because of 2A. He learned all these ideas in some gun club and wanted to use it in real life.
I mean 67 is still not that old he’s still got a pretty decent amount of life left to live . What blows my mind is people who legit kill other people still can get outta prison I was in detox and there was a guy also on detox that had come a few days ahead of me that had just got out of prison for a 25 year sentence for killing another guy with a hack at the time I was 25 myself that man had been in prison my whole life but what blow my mind even more was he was out free yet he took someone’s life.
@Vilimir yeah some people shouldn’t have guns. The one line I always remember is “I don’t want a gun because I know I’ll use it.” If you don’t have a gun then you won’t use it.
If you’re like this guy and have one you’ll find a reason to use it. Guy should’ve just fought with his fists but instead he’s trying to be a vigilante over a parking space at a gas station.
@Allan Wright no way. I agree it deserves a long sentence. I am explaining that this man wasn’t planning on murdering people. There were aggravating factors.
@rafer Jefferson iii you're right! I would send him rather to Kolyma. For hmm.... 2 years? There are many many fun things to do there and the weather is incredible!
@Slowa rim the rafer Jefferson man is criticizing the Vhyles man by comparing his proposed sentence to that of medieval times. Not saying that medieval law was morally proper. You need to practice reading comprehension
@rafer Jefferson iii Islam isn't a race buddy. All this EvErYtHiNg Is RaCiSt nonsense has become the Boy Who Cried Wolf fable. It's insufferable at this point.
@WHITEB0NE they should let people take cats to prison 😅. Dogs are usually friendly enough to bond with someone else but many cats only love one person and they could definitely be more readily accommodated happily. Besides I reckon it would generally reduce violence in prisons and improve prisoners’ mental health to have pets
@BrunoFC well maybe you will learn something from this case. I once knew a Vietnamese guy who habitually pulled knives on people and had actually stabbed someone fatally and done time for manslaughter. He said to me once that these white guys were a foot taller than him and he was not just going to let them bash him. He is the only one I met that articulated it explicitly but there are many who subscribe to that train of thought. It’s no good expecting everyone to operate by the Queensberry rules just because they happen to work well for you. If you expect to be able to silence or subdue and humiliate other men through physical force then you are likely in this day and age to learn a hard lesson just like the victim here.
I can't say I cried over his beating. Perhaps prison justice will help Drejka finally self-reflect and admit responsibility for murdering a father who was justified to protect his family from danger.
@Rosa Lind "You ain't need sell me..." Sound like you from the same hood as the victim. No wonder you think him attacking someone over words is justified.
Plenty of folks draw their pistol in the mirror. Its good practice to make sure you can safely and quickly draw your firearm. Yeah the one liners would be over the top.
@MegaRagingBunny He deserves to be in jail for a lot longer than 20 years for shooting someone who was backing away. The virtual guarantee that he practiced this sort of thing in the mirror is irrelevent to that fact.
@CalCustom the dude was assaulted, possibly hit his head while falling, he is afraid, confused and in panic. Did you asses that? Do you know how people react with head injuries? Obviously not, or you wouldn't be making stupid assumptions.
@MegaRagingBunny Actually, yes I have a lot of experience in situations exactly as you described. I was a Force Reconnaissance Marine, and I used to hunt rhino poachers for an NGO in Namibia. It was my job for a decade to assess threats in violent situations despite being confused, afraid, or even concussed. Also, he clearly didn't hit his head in the video, nor did he claim he hit his head, so your entire comment is baseless. The threat had clearly deescalated before he pulled the trigger, so much so that even a person with a head injury could see.
@CalCustom oh so while being a marine, you often got in to verbal arguments about parking and got battered by physically imposing husbands while hunting poachers? You are a joke :D
@CalCustom " I used to hunt rhino poachers for an NGO in Namibia" Aaand with that, you have won this argument and all future arguments on this subject.
@MegaRagingBunny if someone came up to me and pushed me to the ground and I was scared and I had a gun, I still wouldn’t shoot the person. Anyone who automatically decides to shoot someone because that person pushed them shouldn’t own a gun and obviously has some issues. Shooting someone should be a last resort. Don’t defend a murderer that’s messed up
@MegaRagingBunny yes because he killed someone after already harassing a woman infront of her kids. Regardless of a placard, you don’t get to random harass people.
@Kimberly Diaz that definitely deserves assault? Right? So you think that if someone ever talks to you when you don't want them to, you think you can assault them? Of course you don't, you would be in jail otherwise. Shows how far you are willing to bend reality just to fit your narrative.
@Zen give me time stamps where he says he was ok with the assault? You think going to a person and talking to them is confrontation? its worthy of physical assault?
If you say he has threatened with his gun that proves that he can control himself, if he still is allowed to carry the gun after multiple incidents means that he was justified to do it or police would have revoked his right to bear arms.
When you write stuff, do you even filter it? Obviously not, because you don't see your own contradictions.
Also calling out someone for doing something illegal is not "taking law into his hands", in some instances not calling out an illegal act and not reporting it is an illegal act.
@MegaRagingBunny brah if someone push you down you can pull your weapon to defend yourself but if they give up and back away you can't shoot them XD if anything you win and just file assault charge, not become a murderer yourself and face prison time.
@Alexander Redhorse What tough guy, what the hell are you talking about? Learn to deal with people that might have different opinion, will save a lot of frustrations in your life.
@Tobias He did personal attacks, so I responded by pointing out his insecurity. And how much did I focus on it, calling him out once is now a focus? OK bro ;)
@Krissy Meowjust because i have a difference of opinion doesn't mean its snarky. Grow up, the world is not against you and you are not the center of it.
@Kimberly Diaz His lawyer didn't agree with you, most stand your ground states don't agree with you, also many sheriffs do not agree with you. Instead they clearly state not to assault strangers in states with lax gunlaws. Its not even something political - its common sense.
What am I bending? And why would I fight someone who has assaulted me? What kind of ghetto logic is that? No one should be assaulting anyone, keeping verbal arguments verbal is common sense. If your first reaction to a verbal argument is physical assault, then you need to seek treatment.
@Java Ras I am not trying hard to justify anything, i have an opinion, that i have not been swayed enough to change and the character attacks keep me entertained so I hang around.
Also misrepresenting evidence? What evidence? And evidence for what? I think you are confused.
"You even lie and mention that he hit his head" You just make up stuff as you go, I never made that claim. I might have said, that he might have or could have, as no one knows other than the guy who shot.
So what other "evidence" have a lied for or have misinterpreted? As pretty much I have had only one point that iv been pushing through.
Could it be that maybe you are just not smart enough to understand my point, why isn't that option on the table? Just because you cannot comprehend someone else point, doesn't mean its flawed or wrong or with a bad intent.
@MegaRagingBunny I'm sorry but when you watch the same video and even the perpetrator doesn't say at any point that he hit his head and you say that he might so you can justify his actions I once again question your intentions. You may want to skirt away from the fact that you are making the claim that the possibility of him hitting his head could be good justification for his actions despite he himself not mentioning it. So yes I think with no evidence you are trying hard to justify a murder. And saying it's your opinion doesn't get you beyond that.
@MegaRagingBunny just because I'm petty 26:51 the cop basically asks did you realize they may not like that too much? And he basically says it was fine because he takes the proper precautions and "has a permit". He's ready to take a life over a fucking parking spot. He knows it may not go well and he had his gun ready to kill over it. Nuff said. That shouldn't be your mentality as a gun owner or carrier of a firearm. Your mentality as a gun owner should be "how do I make sure everyone gets home safe?". You don't do that by confronting someone when they aren't harming anyone, and are breaking a minor traffic law.
He's talking to the police like he thinks they are 'brothers-in-arms' debriefing him after a successful mission. Then he rigs up a shirt-sling for his arm to act like he's the walking wounded but is soldiering on for pity.
@Joseph Imbert ??? Bro they talk like this with any criminal no matter the fuckin crime bro they gotta get something out of the suspect and without abusing or harassing them
@Teggiano Salerno Oh yeah, a black man would treat the police just the same way this guy does. It's not like black communities think all cops are bastards or anything, that'd be ridiculous. They love the police.
@Teggiano Salerno he better pray to his god they have at least neutral position on his race because the slightest leaning to steryotyping and racisim and hes behind bars for life no matter what evidence they have against him
@Joseph Imbert they do that to get information. If someone is intimidated by a cop in an interrogation room they’re not gonna wanna say anything and they’ll wait for a lawyer. It’s a tactic they use to get info.
If you are a concealed carrier you have a responsibility to be calmer and more responsible than the average person. It’s not your job to enforce parking laws. Just mind your business, be polite and respectful, and hope against hope you never have to draw that weapon.
Statistically speaking CCW holders are some of the least likely people to commit crimes, one study said they commit crimes less often than police officers. Unfortunately, a few scumbags like this guy still slip through the cracks.
EXACTLY!Even if she didn’t need to park there it wasn’t his responsibility to check her!It would have been different if he himself or someone else needed the space but other than that all he had to do was mind his business.And not only that but he was parked illegally himself....
@Spencer Lenahan No opinion on this situation - just want to point out that telling people to "just Google it" is dismissive to the point of being counterproductive. Assuming you're right, they could just selectively search.
This mindset is the rot of society in my opinion. It is not the sole job of only the law enforcement to address bad behaviour. Everyone in society has that obligation. That handicapped spot is there for a reason. To ensure there is a spot left for handicapped people when it's busy, besides usually being the closest spot to the entry and having more space so somebody with a severe disability can more easily been helped out of the car. If you park there because you're lazy it serves you right if somebody asks you to park somewhere else and if it was an honest mistake be responsible, take the criticism and just move your car. If people are not supposed to address bad behaviour anymore lazy and egocentric people will only abuse that to try to get away with even more, or we will have to put a police officer on every single corner to make sure people behave decently. This whole incident to the point of shooting is completely to blame to both the woman and her husband. Obviously the shooting was absolutely unjustified and if he would've just pressed charges instead of shooting the couple would've ended up with assault and parking on a handicapped spot.
@___Meph___ I am fully with him standing up for handicapped people and parking laws that is just a part of being a decent human, but I do believe that he fired his gun prematurely, I get that it was in the heat of him being attacked by that other dude but he should’ve had better self control
@carly jeffrey what’s wrong with normal citizens standing up against wrong behavior? You really gonna say people who are not disabled and park on handicapped parking spots should have the privilege of not being told off?
Just having people know you have a gun escalates the situation. Just knowing you have a gun escalates the situation. Stay away from anything that's made to kill things.
He wasn't enforcing anything; if you watch again you'll see he barely even moved his body at all while he argued with the woman- he was stationary and objectively non-threatening in posture. The one that attacked him by surprise on the street, was the one enforcing things. A bully. Parks in the disabled spot to stop for snacks and drinks, then immediately surprise attacks someone that verbally confronts his party.
@Xelio our society has already agreed vigilante "justice" shouldn't occur because of psychopathic idiots like Drejka. This video is the perfect reason on why people SHOULDN'T randomly confront strangers as if they're a legal authority.
@battery did you miss the part of the video where they state people within the store could hear the two of them arguing? He was clearly being aggressive, it wasn't a simple "please move out of the handicapped spot," it was a dumb ass playing traffic cop, taking photos of liscencse plates, and then screaming at the woman for her mistake. The dude pushed him to get his aggressive ass away from his wife, and then IMMEDIATELY backed off before the gun was even pointed.
@samvale 1 person would already way too many. And yeah we have easy access to guns, but the VAST majority of gun owners would never fire it unless a life was legitimately in danger. We have easy access to guns because of America’s history, it’s an important thing for us.
There are a couple of scenarios where having a concealed weapon make sense, but in everyday society it makes little sense. You’re just a potential liability. If you want to protect people that badly, join law enforcement.
@Rainy Watch the footage again. The victim stands in the same spot the entire time he is arguing with the woman. He does not move, he barely moves his body - and does NOT look threatening in any way.
The attacker saw him arguing with his wife and instantly lost his cool - escalating the situation from verbal disagreement to violence. Am I wrong? Did we not see the same footage? And like I say, there are 0 indicators in either witness accounts or body language that he was threatening anyone verbally.
I'd hope people watch that footage and think about how dangerous escalating a simple disagreement about a disabled spot into violence can be. You put your own life at risk when you attack someone, particularly by surprise and with such violence.
@battery first of all, the murderer is not the fucking victim. Secondly, he literally was walking around her car taking photos, and yelling at her (they literally say they could hear them screaming in the store) despite being a random civilian with NO AUTHORITY or right to accost them.
He heard the man screaming at his wife and pushed him away from her before immediately backing up, this occurs before the gun was even drawn.
The shooting after that was not at all justified, doesnt matter what the actual victim was doing beforehand because he was not threatening the life of the murderer, this is so clear that he got sentenced for it. Maybe next time, some random psycho with a gun shouldn’t be playing traffic cop for fun.
battery, just in case you are NOT trolling, the murderer circling the women’s car and taking pics with kids in it, was enough for her to shot HIM in fear of her life. So no the murderer did not have a right to make people feel unsafe and threaten and then shot someone, only to claim that HE felt threatened, that’s not how self defense works.
@Rainy "Secondly, he literally was walking around her car taking photos" No, untrue. Like i said, when he notices the illegally parked car, he stops and stands in the same place. He does not "walk around her car". Look at his body language before he was attacked and see if he looks threatening to you.
"He heard the man screaming at his wife and pushed him away from her". PSA for you very young people learning life. You're not allowed to attack someone on the street if they start flaming you or your wife. You're allowed to insult someone, you're allowed to be very pissed off and furious with someone. You're not allowed to attack people. He misread the situation, and instantly attacked instead of thinking.
Had the victim not shot the attacker, he should have called the police and hopefully gotten the thug arrested and convincted for assault&battery. The footage shows what can happen if you mistake life for a cartoon and start attacking anyone who "screams at your wife".
Again, HE WAS STATIONARY THE ENTIRE TIME, THE ATTACKER CAME UP TO HIM, INSTIGATED THE VIOLENCE. Are we watching the same footage?
@Ashencloud its a common stat* that people use... no idea where it came from but you hear it a lot in the acab community... I couldn't find a source either could a fried when we looked. So not pulled out of his ass... but someone's.
@Rainy If you attack someone on the street by surprise, you lose your right to immediate safety. It's that simple. He chose to attack and put the victim in a state of life&death shock, and he paid for it with his life.
PSA to bullies and thugs like the attacker in this video:
If you are in the habit of attacking people by surprise on the street, make sure you're also in the habit of raising your hands as soon as a GUN GETS POINTED AT YOU IN SELF-DEFENCE...
@NateSanti You clearly haven't watched the footage carefully at all. 1:54 He does not "circle her car", but is at the front of the store, nearby where the attacker's car. I have done the same thing when seeing someone illegally park in a disabled spot. He is literally just standing infront of the store, pacing briefly and slightly, until he stands in one position- again just infront of the store, not up in the car, right till he is pushed.
Do me a favour and watch his body language, the way he moves his arms and body, if he is moving closer to the attacker's wife, etc. You will see someone having a perfectly normal heated disagreement about parking outside a store. People have mentioned her safety, but she was inside the car with the door closed for the entire sequence... The victim was only attacked once SHE stepped up into HIS personal space. I'm not making this up, try and watch the footage again carefully. He was not being threatening, and didn't even notice the attacker, because he was just focused on scolding this woman for taking up a disabled spot to buy snacks.
Taking pictures of someone doing a particularly nasty thing in public like that is NOT illegal, yes, EVEN if you have children! And you're allowed to criticise other american's in public, you know. People in the store heard "raised VOICES", not a "raised voice".
And again, The victim was only attacked once SHE stepped up into HIS personal space...
@Rainy I'm being rude because i disagree with you? We have come to different conclusion based on the evidence, is all. No need to embarrass yourself so much mate, calm down.
@Rainy Try to watch the footage again but in reality this time- you'll see that much of what you said is simply untrue and misleading. He didn't "push him to get him away from her". She was in her car up until the second he was pushed. He stayed still, outside the shop, she started to stand up close to him- then he was attacked.
Reality can be hard- when the narrative doesn't fit what you're seeing. so you get angry and childish :) Try to watch the footage again and really pinpoint the moments for YOU that justify using immediate violence against the man, okay?
@Rainy "If things had gotten violent between those two". Baseless hypothetical. You cannot park in disabled spots, then attack anyone who shouts at you for it on the street. Simple as.
"hyperfocus on the relatively miniscule details" Like that he was standing in a normal spot, never threatened her, was not close to her, never showed any sign of indicating he would be close to her? And that SHE MOVED TO HIM just before he was attacked? I'm really sorry you struggle with reading comprehnsion and critical thinking, but don't worry! maybe stick to things like arts and crafts instead of trying to critically think
@Rainy Oh? Are you aware what jury duty is? Do you know that in this case, a group of people like ourselves had to decide who was the victim in this situation? You wouldn't have been allowed to serve on jury duty, with this attitude that those who disagree with your verdict are "filth" that you already had "pegged" as such :) They screen people with obvious bias and lack of perspective right away!
You continue your melodrama all you want. In my opinion based on the evidence, in this incident the victim is the one who was initially attacked. I'm sure my character will be able to take the blows you give it based on this hahahah
@battery if only those around you would see you as the monster you are. Just know that there are forces beyond your control that have observed your horrid essence and will respond accordingly. Sleep tight.
@Rainy "he directly threatened her by walking around her car taking random photos and screaming at her". You don't understand what a "direct threat" is. Nor a threat. He threatened no one, his body language was unthreateneing (as we can both plainly see), and he verbally argued with her for parking in the disabled spot illegally. Normal altercation. No reason to believe it was necessary for him to be attacked.
"My guess though is that you only care when the victim is white, there I read the elephant in the room, the lingo gave you away." More ENTIRELY baseless claims. My lingo? Genuinely don't know what you could be refering to. ..."Thug"? Not everyone lives in the USA, my friend, english is a vast language. Thugs are thugs.
It's funny how calm and polite others are when they know your carrying I've noticed. That being said, I agree 100% with your statement. Love thy neighbor
@Joey Tompkins The only reason we really have a right to bear arms was the stand up against the government-not other people. Considering how much the military has advanced and has weapons the normal people aren't allowed to have, that amendment is really nothing more than a mockery to it's original purpose. It's outdated and the only reason people still want it cause they have this impression that a bullet is the only thing in this world that can save them despite other countries proving that sentiment wrong over and over again...
Ty. I need my hip replaced but had a heart attack which makes me wait another year. I don't like how people abuse handicrap spaces,. But live and let live. Not for me to judge why someone needs one. Not a reason to show off my temper.
@battery if he called the police after being pushed, he probably would have gotten in trouble too. There are EYE WITNESS accounts of him circling around the car and then (where the recording starts) started screaming at her. The victim could very well counted (of course depending on how they decide to recount the story) that as self defense/saving another person since he's clearly just one word from getting violent. He'd get in trouble for verbal harrassment, and the victim would get in trouble for parking in a handicap spot.
@ShinySylvie That's Not the Only reason. It never fails- those who call our constitution "Outdated" area the ones who don't have a fundamental understanding of it.
The right to defend yourself, loved ones, your nation and property, as well as against tyranny is timeless and will never end. Ask the people of Venezuela how it worked out for them after they lost their right to bear arms.
@ShinySylvie Ask yourself- Why has no other country even attempted to invade American soil? Do yourself a favor, look up what our enemies leaders said about doing that, and why it's never been attempted...
@] Mantis-Mike [ People who want to helicopter parent the world like this guy are horrible for society.
And I hate to break it to all the social justice and anti-racism folks but your movement is a helicopter-parent-the-world movement. Stop it or you'll ruin lives like this guy or worse.
@Teddy don’t act like the shooting was in anyway the couples fault. It’s completely unexpected and Insane to think someone would pull out a gun in this situation. That’s like getting killed for petty theft
It absolutely was his business with the parking spot though. She was parked in a disabled only parking spot and the guy with the gun was a disabled person. Saying "iTs nOt uR joB" when it literally affects him is just ignorant.
@carly jeffrey he was parked illegally because he was a disabled person and she took a disabled parking spot. educate yourself before making stupid comments
@yuun paan That's not an acceptable reaction to shoot the guy just because he pushed you though. Somebody losing their life over a parking spot, and pretending his reaction was okay because he says he was handicapped is just ridiculous
@Sean O The man came up to someone parked on a handicap spot and checked if they had a handicap placard, then he told whoever he saw inside the car to move the car somewhere else since they don’t have a handicap placard, that is very natural and good behavior, there’s nothing creepy about it, he even said he didn’t see the kids because the windows were tinted dark, and even if he saw them that doesn’t change the fact that his motive is good and there was nothing creepy about what he was asking... stop trying to make mothers invincible to being told off when they are found obviously doing something wrong and this situation has nothing to do with the kids or the fact that shes a woman.
@MyTrashSchuulProjects I never did, like I literally wrote: "... the shooting was absolutely unjustified". Nevertheless, up until the push, the couple was completely at fault up to that point and the guy was completely in his right to address the egocentric behaviour of the couple parking on the handicapped spot. In my opinion the guy should not have been walking around with a gun in the first place, as it is not allowed in most countries that I know of to walk in public with firearms. Unfortunately the US is an exception where this is allowed and you get this unnecessary escalation of things.
@Rainy while I agree the shooting was completely unjustifiable (I don't think people should walk around or own firearms altogether and this is another tragic example for that opinion). Up until the point and including the assault the couple was completely to blame. If the shooter would've went to his car to call the police instead of pulling out his gun the woman would've gotten a ticket for parking at a handicapped spot and the guy would've been rightfully charged with assault.
@macuser1232 Lots of cavemen in the comments. I would not have instantly attacked a man telling off my wife for parking in the disabled spot through her closed window, standing still. no witness reports of threatening. witness reports TWO raised voices- a standard parking altercation. He victim wasn't ready for violence, he wasn't looking for violence- it's clear from his body language. He was just attacked by surprise, and put into a panic position with life and death consequences.
@Rainy "your soul is rotted, no need to defend the light". Good to know the kind of lucidity i'm talking with here. I sincerely hope you get past your delusions
@Teddy Yup. I don't understand how anyone watches this footage and doesn't see a violent irresponsible thug. I see this as akin to break testing someone in a car, then getting totalled. Obivously the shot isn't ideal, but the attacker put his own life at risk by initiating violence on the street.
@MyTrashSchuulProjects It's insane to think a 47 old year old man would draw his concelead pistol after being attacked by surprise, still recovering on the ground? Could you explain why you think that?
@] Mantis-Mike [ It's misleading to say he lost his life over a "parking spot". He lost his life because he attacked someone by surprise on the street. Very simply.
The wife was shouted at and argued with "over a parking spot". The victim was attacked by surprise "over a parking spot". The attacker was shot over "a surprise violent attack".
@battery he shot too early. Plain and simple. There was significant separation between the two of them so he wasn’t attempting to “beat him to a pulp” and if the attacker had any weapon he would’ve pulled it out by then or even while approaching the shooter.
@battery So you would've shot the guy in the face, and ended his life in front of his wife and kids just because he pushed you? And pushed isn't a "Violent attack". Anybody would've defended their woman the same way.
There was Plenty of open spots available. This guy picked a fight over something so petty and was looking to use his gun, for any reason, and now he's where he belongs. All over a parking spot.
@] Mantis-Mike [ The bully parked his car in the ONLY disabled parking spot, to stop for drinks and snacks.
The victim chose to confront and argue with the woman upon realising this, as I would. He was not in her personal space, nor did his body language indicate a threat at ANY TIME (go ahead, find the timestamps where you think you can see him be threatening).
The victim was arguing "over a parking spot", yes. He was attacked over arguing with the attacker's wife, however- not the parking space. If you fools think you're allowed to attack someone by surprise when they are having road rage on the street, you're in for a nasty shock in the real world...
The attacker chose to end his own life by putting himself in extreme life or death danger... by attacking someone by surprise- then taking 3 steps up to him on the ground, taking an extremely macho intimdating pose- and going to continue the assault. He ONLY started to move back once he saw the gun- he was about to keep going and bully the victim.
Looks like a great trip to the store for a bully to me. Thinks you can park in the sole disabled spot and not be picked up on it by the public verbally? Think you can attack someone instantly who is just speaking to your wife from inside her car, someone who has not even moved their body for 45 seconds, someone who was only attacked ONCE the WOMAN STEPPED UP TO HIM.
Really worth critically thinking about. Same for your statement that "and was looking to use his gun, for any reason".
Quite bizare to me, to be watching the same footage as you, of a 47 year old man being attacked by surprise in car park - and only taking out his pistol once recovering from the attack... on the ground... Are you trying to have a serious discussion here, saying that he "was looking to use his gun, for any reason"? How much more warranted and immediate does the use of a gun have to be, if not when you're violently attacked from behind all of a sudden??
I haven't even gotten 2 minutes into the video yet....paramedics took 19 minutes to get there?! Stay safe, stay armed. When seconds count, help is minutes away.
He shot a man and the only accurate statement he made about the incident was that the man he shot was black. He legitimately could not accurately recollect anything except for the color of his victim's skin.
There's a Wawa across the street from me. I've been there pretty much everyday, usually multiple times per day, for about 7-8 years now. I've never once considered it "my" store, and I certainly didn't approach anyone for a mere parking violation.
yeah nah, he had no reason to shoot him, its not like the guy was still on top of him, he literally walked away. Michael just wanted to kill him at that point
I feel like this guy and the cops definitely think they’re both on the same team so to speak. Like when all this guy sees on the internet are police officers killing and using their guns so easily, he thinks that this is all justified from seeing the police do it.
Lawyers be playing with they while soul. He could have giving that argument without saying the shooter was the victim. If there is a judgment day, someone is gonna ask him about that one
The tellers voice is really great. Normally I want see my video without someone talking in between. But not with JCS. The teller should really ask for job in tv or something. 👍
The guy had no reason to shoot the fire arm you can clearly see the man back up and put his hands up but he chose to shoot the man without being in amy danger of his life
When people say they sleep with their gun by their side this guy literally slept with his gun. If he could marry it I’m sure he would. He was looking for a fight because he knew his gun was there and sure enough he got to use it. Good for you gun lover! No need to use your fists because you’re a tough guy!
It doesn't matter how you feel about someone parking in a handicap spot when they're not handicap. The fine for doing so is a couple hundred bucks, it's not worth death.
Anyone wondering this dude got his ass beat by a black inmate who claimed to be the victims brother. He had no relation to the victim but ayeee Karma works in mysterious ways
Spot on. A genuinely innocent person would of at least showed some emotions after finding out they just killed somebody. His reaction told us everything we already knew. He finally got to realise his twisted dream of establishing dominance
1 like
Jack Saunders2021-06-13 18:58:05 (edited 2021-06-13 20:03:06 )
This the type of guy who dresses, talks and acts like he's Ex-Military without ever directly declaring it. But in everyway shape and form wants you to believe he was.
He says…. his store. These demonic sadistic cowardly thugs out there Are very territorial from lots of things in the past I’m sure and there’s a big problem in America I’ve noticed and I’ve been all over the world of these nut bags protecting what they think are there material things, places, and or people. They can’t help but to get into other peoples business I can’t imagine how many people he has harassed before and got away with it and I hope to God he doesn’t get away with this murder. Those poor babies had to see all of this!!!!! Florida still has electric chair right?
@Hunter Hudgens to be real, if the population of all of those states were 98% neo-nazi I still wouldn’t want to actually bomb them. There would still be millions of not nazis.
“There’s almost no way of me being racist. My upbringing prevents that from coming out of me.” Please, tell me how this man is capable of feeding himself…
No way to win. “I’m not racist” oh that’s what a racist would say. “I live in the south so racism is pervasive (note in the south both black AND white people are often racist) but I don’t act that way
It was strange the way he said that. As though he admits it is in him, but dosent let it out due to his upbringing. Maybe he is just terrible with words? Who really knows with crazy people like this.
1 like
T Mo T2022-03-14 13:30:24 (edited 2022-03-14 13:32:31 )
The way he describes the incident, you'd think a linebacker tackled him. Clearly he watches too much Serie A.
I am 100% for people using force to defend themselves, however this arrogant guy fancied himself an armed guard of convience store and felt that he had some sort of authority because he carried a gun. I'm glad he was locked up, you can't go start confrontations if you're armed.
The way this guy talks about what he did sounds way too much like Dwight Shrute. If you are a photocopy of a sitcom character that’s a good sign you’re in the wrong…
I live in Europe and the fact you can carry a gun in the US just like that is beyond me. Then people like him use it and defend themselves that they were in a danger, even though the victim did not have any gun or a knife. Ridiculous
I used a handgun to defend me and my mom when I was 16 and my dad was on a fishing trip. The second ammendment saves so many lives per year you wouldn't even believe it. I have spent a lot of time in Europe for work. You don't have the save quantity of drug addicted nuts willing to skin your face for a beer. I now live in Mexico where there are very strict gun laws and there have been 6 shootings within 5 blocks of my house in 10 years. Three weeks ago there was a hit that occurred right outside a church while my mother in law was in mass. You don't even understand the issues in North America.
I would’ve asked some following questions after his “ I haven’t been hit like that since my 20s”…. ‘ were you verbally assaulting a young mother then too,? Or was that another handicap sticker check moment also,??”
for as many times as ive watched this, i realized that markese could have ran away faster, but he wanted to protect his family and not leave his wife in the line of fire.... awww
After watching it again when he falls to ground after being pushed he is appear ing to be looking at him and dude is still kinda moving forwards and then he lifted up his shorts but he was mad for the being pushed it's a dang shame over being a parking police that young man will never see his kid and wife again and other dude is in prison. Stupid people mind your own business
This narrator is always my favorite one cuz he really deconstructs what the persons state of mind is and the specific ways they’re attempting to convey themselves.
@Florence Jones yeah, but if you notice with the different narrators, they aren’t as thorough as this one, in my opinion. This guy seems to give pause at the right times to set up the current state of what’s happening with the facts at the current moment of interrogation in terms of who knows what, at the current point in the timeline of events.
If you notice in the descriptions, different people are analyzing the each video
29 likes
Em V2021-08-13 18:17:53 (edited 2021-08-27 21:22:28 )
@Kenny Hooker JCS is the real deal, all the other channels copy his style
@Kenny Hooker I agree with you. The narrator has a lot of experience and that’s why he’s so adept at putting in the right information for us at the right time. There’s very few other channels that can do this anywhere near as well as this one. Most of the others make way too many interruptions or don’t do it with as much intelligence of delivery.
@pryese7 Fighting fire with fire will only make the wildfire grow more out of control. Stooping to his level of judgement on people doesn’t really help anyone in the long run.
@pryese7 yeah I don’t get it man. Racists confuse me on both sides. I don’t get how people assume that because one race suffers injustices, then that justifies that race to behave improperly towards all others. It doesn’t make sense to me.
@XxDAMARIESU123xX {DA ACTRUAL MARU SUIE} uhhh yeah that's how life is to certain things "Oh I hate the color Blue" Good for you I don't care "Oh I don't think racism is an issue" you are part of the problem :T
@katrina -w- Just because racism is an issue doesn't mean that the appropriate response to it is more racism but going in the opposite direction. If you're against racism be against all racism and not just the parts that you don't like.
@ddandymann sorry, did you get beat up on the street for being white? Did you not get the job for being white? Did the police stoped you just because you are white? Did your ancestors get considered less worth of being alive and wore slaved because of that? Did the ramifications of them being slaved continued for hundreds of years until the current day? There is no racism against the oppressor, and white people have being the oppressor for hundreds and HUNDREDS of years and now people are holding y'all accountable and your first reaction is play the victim...
@katrina -w- By that logic no white person can claim not to be racist as that claim has a direct implication that not all white people are racist and thus makes said white person part of the problem. Do you not see the circular nature of your logic here? Also you never did give any ideas on how to solve these problems that you seem so passionate about. If you would like some then just let me know.
@Flavored Chip i think its pretty funny, i call it the franz ferdinand effect, you say something controversial then leave the scene and let the miserable people of the internet fight and watch the chaos unfold
@Mr. RocknRollah it couldve been a simple altercation that everyone walked away alive from but no dude had to shoot someone over being shoved, absolutely pathetic, if youre nothing without your gun you dont deserve the gun
@paulo amido so being shoved to the ground is a reasonable response to someone telling your girl that you parked in a handicapped spot for no reason. The whole situation would have been different if he hadn’t shoved him as a first response
@katrina -w- I agree that racism has been codified into institutions and that black people (and other minorities at that) experience racism on an unrivalled level compared to white people. It’s systemic racism, and white people do not experience it. That said, racism as a concept is universally applicable - you can treat anyone, regardless of their skin colour, poorly because of it. In striving for equality, first comes the social learning that we are all equal and interpersonal equality (not calling people slurs or names or propagating racist stereotypes) and then expunging those same mentalities from laws. In that subtext, racist treatment can occur to anyone provided certain context.
@Dylan Partyka I disagree with her too, but try to pick a different argument than “you’re playing the victim.” I’m sure that will change her mind and think of you better.
@Zachary Morritt claiming you disagree with her and then coming to her defense more than once makes you seem unstable, I don’t need you to agree with me, and I don’t need to not call out stupidity when I see it, so I will continue doing so, thanks.
@katrina -w- Never said that racism wasn’t a problem. What I’m TRYING to say is fighting racism with more racism doesn’t help anybody at all. Knowledge, empathy, and basically listening to each other to SOLVE the problem helps. Fighting each other for whatever reason there is will only have the fighting grown on a bigger scale. You can see this on any news in any country that’s in conflict rn!
@Anthony Isabella Defending someone whom you disagree with from childish attacks does not discredit your argument with the person you may be defending.
I wouldn't approve of someone attacking you baselessly all the same, though we're in disagreement.
@Anthony Isabella You can call people stupid to your heart's content, but it is that precise failure to engage with someone's ideology that is a severe issue. If your aim really is to mend the flaws in the social, political, and economic fabric of your nation (I'm assuming you're a US citizen), then empathy is a valuable tool in your arsenal. The first step is in recognizing that the intent of most people is in doing genuine good, and if you see flaws in their methods, pointing them out to people is far more beneficial.
Also, don't you think it's a little too simple to say that the reason why your country is flawed is because of stupidity? I imagine there is far more than one reason.
@Anthony Isabella You addressed a lot there, so I'll go point by point. - Too many people believe the government and mainstream media's propaganda. I am no fan of the mainstream media, but not because I believe there is any sort of conspiracy between the government and media to stay in power. I believe that an administration will put out information it thinks is favourable to it, and the media is a for-profit system, so it appeals to its base. FOX presents the news in a particular biased way, as does CNN. But even the more liberal news networks cut out some left-leaning people, such as Bernie Sanders. Ultimately, the media is far more conservative in the US than it is really anywhere else globally. People listen to who they want to hear.
- Too many people don't question anything because they're too stupid. Yes and no. Many people in the US are politically disinterested. They couldn't care less about the bulk of politics, but you wouldn't think that on internet comment threads such as this when you immerse yourself in a particular type of people - engaged people who are political. Many of my friends are politically disinterested. For those who are, many will ascribe themselves to a specific group of people with shared philosophies (their in-group), and in-group bias causes people to have a hard time engaging with ideology outside their circle. This is propagated by the internet, where it is easy to find other like-minded individuals.
- Education + Common sense would lead the nation down a better path. Education? Yes. Common sense? What is common sense anyway? Common sense is in the eye of the beholder. What you might think is common sense, I may not, so I can't speak to your common sense. But education in the United States is massively undercut and underfunded, so I agree with you there. As for what you said about smaller governments, I think that smaller governments are only more effective than larger governments when corruption is rampant, and a state's democracy is weakened. The system of voting in the US is convoluted and painful. Corporations are allowed to give unlimited donations to fund charities, and the revolving door between Washington and Wallstreet practically spins off its own hinge. Address those things, in addition to education, and I think you'll see a major improvement.
- There are just too many morons. (People can't parse the difference between their / they're / there.) What about spelling? Not sure why you're so hung up on that. People's ability to pick the right word doesn't correlate with their well-meant intentions. I do think there is a lack of education in the United States. Still, it is equally rivalled by widespread corruption and political divisiveness attributable, at least in part, to internet ideological echo chambers and for-profit corporate-run media.
- People assume we're equal, but we're not. In ability? You're right; we all differ. In worth or intrinsic rights? We all must be treated equally under the law, and we should strive to treat others equally.
- You (you reading this) think you're stupid but still smarter than most people you meet. I find that very judgemental - which I'm sure you'd agree with but say is justified. I just don't see the value of comparing people as opposed to ideas. I know too little about you to cast any judgement about you personally, so I don't (or at least not vocally, anyhow; we all have internal monologues).
- If you don't realize the above, you're an idiot too. Guess I am.
They both were looking for a fight tbh, dude comes, pulling up his shorts getting ready, and immediately pushed and looked for a fight as much as the other idiot who shot. He backed up because of the gun. If drejka didn't have a gun the other idiot definitely would have wanted a fight, loads are like this
This murderer took a fathers life over a freaking disabled parking spot. Why are there people walking the streets like that?! It's none of their business. He is the male version of Karen
@Arturo Ordaz I agree with you but there is one thing I believe you are missing.....the original post he said "obsessed with" but you said "interested in".... Big difference...
@Caden Luke I hate dudes like that. We Marines don’t even talk like that. We use some of the jargon, but if u over do it, people will look at like you like you are a recruit. If u talk like a recruit, people will people will treat u like one.
And probably is frustrated because he failed to join because it’s too stupid to score good ; and lived whole life with some delusional pride and got a gun praying to have a chance to prove himself he is good
@TheSleepySnorlax because we are bullies who want to control everything. I am ashamed of my country. I would give up firearms in a heartbeat. If they don't have guns your chances of defending yourself with a knife or pepper spray has to increase even if they have a melee weapon. Not much you can do about a gun unless your quick draw mcgraw.
Did everyone have that kid in their school? Had one who when we had roll call (particularly in new school years or with substitutes) he would yell out “SIR YES SIR” and salute. Very weird
Yep, and of course he wasn’t able to make it in. Funny how people who get scared by people who look different can’t manage to join a diverse organization.
@Abelsm it's not wrong to support the army as such as the military has a use. But to most of the world America seems war obsessed, America also shows a much higher level of patriotism that most of the world sees as odd. That and Americans say they give utmost respect to veterans, yet a significant number of vets end up homeless.
@TheSleepySnorlax, most of the world doesnt understand what its like to be the most powerful nation in the world. A lot of the world knows nothing of patriotism and freedom and all they know is hate and jealousy of those that have it. Not everyone wants to be under the iron boot of tyranny and communism. 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
Then he should have got to birthing basic training or boot camp maybe he would have learned some trigger discipline but I’m sure he would have dropped out or recycled until he was discharged
@Abelsm Canada’s better. Better beer. Better water..... better people in general clearly. Lol. This shit doesn’t happen. Nor do George Floyd incidents lmfao
I'm actually grateful to those guys because they're the ones bananas enough to enlist while walking away with their high school diploma in the parking lot.
@Jambutty its an elective for highschool in the US that basically just promotes the army, they have to wear uniforms once a week and learn abt military leaders etc it stands for junior reserve officer training corps
@cara Thank you so much for taking the time to explain that. As being English I’m fascinated by your culture. Quite a lot of it seems confusing or goes over my head. Been watching some US university marching bands recently. They are really good bands. The costumes and dancing is alien to me but I’m starting to enjoy them,Thanks agin if you ever need anything explaining from our culture I’ll do my best .
I have to say, my brother knows his guns and knows how to handle them. And would do nothing like this, But this guy completely abused his gun rights and used excuses to make him seem like the victim. There are people like this guy vs people who really know how to behave in these situations. But I with your words. Take no offense to my statement
@Dw3yN how is that being butthurt? Hahaha, everyone has a passion/obsession with something they really like, and the guy stated a true fact, you definitely sound like the weirdo here.
@TheSleepySnorlax I feel like you're the type of person to see a soldier homecoming video or heard a soldier being thanked for their service and believe that Americans in general are obsessed over the military
20 years carrying a weapon so you can shoot someone who is attacking you. Cops are Varsity and he was coming off the bench from the Junior Varsity… but he finally had a chance to shoot at a REAL TARGET❗️ He didn’t spend 20 years AIMING AT TARGETS n🚫t to pull the trigger. 🤷🏼♂️
@503 Workshop You're full of shit. He was convicted because the interrogation was shown to the jury. The pigs took a three second event of a guy getting attacked by a powerful thug and expanded it to millisecond by millisecond Monday morning quarterbacking event.
Those pigs had him doubting his own judgement for crissakes.
It's cases like this that make me think there should be an IQ test to be qualified for jury duty.
@503 Workshop Watch the video again. Jim states that because of what he said he couldn't possibly say "I feared for my life and that's why I shot" anymore. A lawyer could've helped him there.
503 Workshop Everything he said was facts. The gun won and the guy pushed him for no reason. Trying to call the guy a racist too lol and even said you’ll block him lol you’re pathetic
42:30 you know he is fucked when his legal team is trying to convince the jury non-hd video, and compression artifacts has any influence on this murder lol
If someone pushed me I’m definitely not just pulling out the strap and shooting. It was wrong point blank. So many things to be mad about and you want to go off over a parking spot at some random convenience store. Even if you are handicapped. That’s fine, you get mad judge how you wanna judge then move on.
“I’ve never been in that situation” Micheal said it himself. He was never in any kind of serious fight and his first instinct was to shoot this man. No words, just raw fear.
Wanna know the worst part. This guy would have been a self described "responsible gun owner" before this incident. I wonder how many more "responsible gun owners" there are out there that are just like this guy. Living their lives every day hoping for the day they get to use their gun.
@Reggin Reggin The idea of a country is a construct of borders. Borders change all the time. Land is land. This was their land. Period. Their borders were based on tribes. My point still stands.
@AL he’s attempting to connect with the investigators by saying stuff like”affirmative” and other crap, kind of like how an upper-middle-class adult would try to connect with a waiter/waitress at an Italian restaurant by saying “gracias” or thank you, in Spanish.
@DriftedKart259 I need a clarification on that :) Is it frowned upon to try to connect with waitresses by thanking them in their own tongue, or is it because of mispronounced 'Grazie' ? Thanks. PS I dont think that guy was saying 'negative' and other stuff to connect but rather he had been playing cop all his life, which clearly shows in other moments.
@Aurora Biondo so it's the ignorant bragging. Asking coz in Europe there are dozens of languages. So when a foreigner tries to thank/greet a waitress or a store clerk in the local language, even with a very bad pronunciation, it is usually received kindly, as an attempt to be polite towards the local culture. But I guess it's a different story here.
Lol! I've experienced that but the other way around: being a Spaniard myself living in an English speaking country, and a number of times someone tried to pleased me by uttering a word in Italian, just because my actual Spanish name feels Italian to them. At first I used to laugh and explain, last times though I would just answer in Italian myself and move on, I waste less time that way.
@Park Chimmy And then on top of that. The point is off people trying to use a language and chopping it up. He's/she's complaint about people using their own language.
we all know his type, how he votes, and who he supports. He's the kind of guy who is the first to wave the American flag, but the last to serve his country in the military. Your comment is a bit small minded though, as gracias is used EVERYWHERE where I come from.
Why no one talks about the fact that the initial physical aggression was a massive overuse of force. He pushed him from the back on a concrete floor for a verbal altercation. People have fucking died for falling wrong. It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself. At least he helped society by terminating an animal.
@Makis Makiavelis depends where in Spain, some parts use “C” other parts use “th”. All stems from a historic member of royalty who had a lisp, and his loyal subjects imitated him! Mad world :)
He shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
@Chris Hopkins Holly crap! I didn't know that. So, the "th" started when people wanted to make a member of royalty feel better about their speech impediment? They must have loved him very much or feared him very much.
@Makis Makiavelis It depends, in Spain c is closer to the "z" sound, but in most of Latin America it resembles more the "s" sound. Tho I recommend not generalising anything Spanish related since there are a lot of countries and they all make their little tweaks to the language.
@Homunculus Rex Drejka sounds like a west Slavic name to me. If you are of the belief that Czechs, Slovenians, etc are not white then you really need to have your vision checked.
Any Italian would understand the Spanish way of saying thank you and vice versa. The difference is more like a different accent than a different language.
@Sophia Troanska Incorrect. Again, there were no land ownership rights for NA. They were nomads squatting on land that they themselves seized control of from the people who occupied it before them so it was up for grabs and constantly changed hands. I'm glad I could educate you because you desperately needed it. You're welcome.
@Sabrason I don’t remember what this comment thread was on. But I swear to God, if this is about Native Americans, ans you chose to call them squatters, we gonna have a problem
@Sabrason oh my God you were. It wasn’t up for grabs. They were using it. We took it from them. If you can recognize that at some point they took that land from other tribes, then you can also recognize that we conquered it. We didn’t just take land that was up for grabs. Nor do I need to be educated from a random man on the internet. You do not know my education level, and based off of the questionable language you used, I can tell your points are leaning towards prejudice more than fact
@Sabrason Ah. So you only believe if a government says so. Then only then it’s true. Societies existed before governments did. You seem to have no flexible understanding of human behavior. You must also believe that animals don’t claim territories since no government said so 🤡
That means that you think he is trying to help other people feel like they are at a restaurant in Italy, and not the United States. Even though "gracias" is a Spanish word, and not Italian, it's still the thought that counts.
We’ve all been there, as Spanish and Italian are actually quite similar ( both languages are from the same origin, an evolution of Latin). To be honest some of the restaurant waiters are just as bad. Trying to give it that authentic feel by saying “Grazie” when you place your order, but it’s the only word of Italian he knows.
The interrogation here is extremely impressive in my opinion. At first I bought the cops' act as they were being friendly and polite to the suspect and I was horrified, before I realized they were acting exactly how they needed to to get Drejka to talk. I bought their act totally in the beginning.
Also, I'm not surprised by the verdict at all. The defence attorney's closing statements to the jury was downright insulting to their intelligence.
3 likes
Ronnie Connell2022-04-23 23:44:26 (edited 2022-04-24 00:22:11 )
He's on the ground after being shoved by the other man, when he positioned himself to reach for his pistol, from his point of view, it could look like the other man was advancing on him. The view distance shortens from in the lying position to the position he was in when he fired. Threatening other people with a gun? This to me could mean he wanted to feel dominant over others & got a thrill out of freaking people out? If the other guy got shot, but not fatality, then I would be in favour of the gunman, but he gave no warning that he was armed & the gunshot through the lung & heart was a precision shot. The gunman was looking for trouble & to find any excuse to use his weapon. How would you react if you were blind sided & you hit the ground hard? Through the shock, he fired with anger. If the black guy only kept things verbal, then maybe, all this would of only been a recording of a heated argument. It's unfortunate how things played out.
He started this entire travesty upset about someone illegally parked when he himself was illegally parked. The guy was back away after the pushed because he saw he had a deadly weapon. As the guy is turning away or running away he shot him, it’s not self defense at that point.
@Fal go listen to the dark daddy. He is the dæmon king. And he is in nyc. All the rappers bow to him. Jay z learned about "do what thou wilt" from the dark prophet in brooklyn... And now the dark prophet has a youtube. Yay! God poured fire into his brain... And now, the angels bleed onto his feet. The dæmons cry tears of fire onto the dark prophets forehead. Jesus forces the dark prophet to drink his blood. NYC bows down to him now, he has collected all the spirits of covid 19 deaths.... He used dark occult brujeria to take these souls. Now go to him. Love him. His beauty will destroy heaven forever. Amen æl dimm thaRR
White Alliance bro you’re terrifying please take this mumbojumbo dark fire daddy sh!t elsewhere. Over here sounding like you’re gonna be the main subject of JCS’s next video.
@BaconNDCheese yeah I carry and have been to classes plus I’m military so I’m definitely familiar with the use of those terms, but it sounds more like he is just pulling those words out of his vocabulary simply to impress the cop.
Lol the negative makes me feel like hes wannabe military/cop, but force multiplier and neutralizing the threat are accurate terms in force analysis. too bad for him his time spent studied force analysis didn't seem to get through in his 20+ years of firearm carrying 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
These are very common terms in armed self defense lessons and groups, however it seems the only information he retained from them was how to sound knowledgeable about self defense
@Joseph DiGiovanni that’s the joke. nobody uses technical terms like that outside of training purposes. I’m in the military but I don’t go around talking like homeboy did during his interrogation 💀 he just wanted to sound high speed for the cop so he could get a taste of his boot.
Yes it's an actual term. Force additive like rearm and resuply. Force subtractive. Wounded soldier or damaged equipment.
Force multiplier: medics hood comms situational awareness stuff.
Force divider. Wounded soldiers psy ops the like.
I've only encountered force multiplayer, when referring to weapons, be used to describe LMGs or SAWs. Recently it's been applied to squad deployed drones (aka raven) but that's an situational awareness platform.
I might have remember it being used in some self defense video or another though I'm not sure about that.
I personaly use negative when talking to people now adays.
Also say again roger Wilco(mostly on text)
I think I might have used a few others.
Luckily for me I d9nt have a career with threats in them so no need to say neutralize a threat.
Military prefers this term as it dosent automatically mean kill, taking control of a guy that drops his ak is neutralized, just as his budy who did not so got a chest full of freadom.
Its main purpose is as a reminder that killing shit ain't the only way to deal with it.
This guy is a turd he hyped himself up with that fire arm and training. Thinking he's an operator and shit.
@Fal I don’t understand how speaking formally with the use of literary devices is an insult. Only the uneducated with learning deficiencies would say so.
@Matt ‘The 1 in 26-1’ Hamill take it easy on the thesaurus, homeboy. We get it, you want to sound smart. I’m knowledgeable about these terms he’s using, I’m in the military and I’ve taken classes for carrying. The thing that’s hilarious to most of us is the fact that he’s using them as if he’s an instructor teaching a class to the cop. You can tell he’s one of those people (much like you, apparently) who likes to use vocabulary like that to impress people. Meanwhile, he just killed a guy and the terms he’s using have nothing to do with justifying the murder.
@FalI learned what euphemisms were and the definition of vernacular in the 8th grade. Again, thinking I’m “trying to sound smart” because of one sentence I wrote is indicative of some sort of learning deficiency. That’s something a child would say to an adult when he’s frustrated and can’t interpret what the adult said. I won’t even dignify a response to your attempt at throwing me into the same crowd as the murderer.
Tacti-cool language from YouTube gun lovers. I've met many of them. It's an attempt to sound military and esoteric, in my opinion it instantly shows when a person is a gun but.
Like he want to be seen as someone on the same level as the police. "someone who talks like this clearly knows his stuff and can't possibly have done something wrong"
Talking about his specific vocabulary (which is being properly used) is totally irrelevant to the case itself, but yeah, I guess people need to feel better by making fun of someone else, as long as the person has a negative image, it's not bullying anyway haha
@Fimmt Well it definitely is about him since the person is talking about him while watching him. It’s not as if his taking the piss out of an innocent child with learning difficulties the guy is a murderer.
@Fimmt I believe it’s because he is trying to speak to the police officers in a way that makes him look as though he is as “qualified as them” or “he is one of them” as if he is knowledgeable but he really is not and it makes him look absolutely ridiculous. Police ask for a simple yes and no not a “negative” and he sounds like a twat. It’s cringe and everyone (except you) finds it hilarious. I love the fact he was convicted of murder even though he thought the police were on his side due to his buzz light year terminology as OP suggested. Apparently “negative” doesn’t exempt you from the hideous murder charge of killing an unarmed black man infront of his wife a child. I’m sure he will get over being called a twat on YouTube. But will his child ever get over that image? I doubt it. Your focused on the wrong thing here.
@MilkyWay2001 Trying to sound like a marine, cop or a soldier is what it is.
0 likes
Sue Zuccati2021-07-07 20:50:49 (edited 2021-07-07 20:52:07 )
Those are actual therms, but they are generally spoken about in a martial context, it's really weird to hear this kind of jargon in an alleged self-defense The guy was out for blood, peace was never an option.
@Fal I never meant anything about guilt, that's your take on it, I personally think it's irrelevant and basic to try to make fun about someone's correct/fitting vocabulary, regardless of who the person is.. I probably wouldn't use those terms myself, but if someone feels comfortable by doing it, then I don't really mind all that much as long as they are properly used. If the guy really tried to "impress" the interrogator, thinking correct manners would somehow counteract the crime he committed, that's just poor reasoning on his behalf..
"Neutralize the threat" is legalese, but saying it that way is a dead giveaway. You don't ever say you shot them to kill them. That's confessing to intent to kill. You say you shot to end the threat to yourself. "Neutralize the threat" is usually how this is explained in technical terms, so he's obviously read somewhere that he's supposed to say that and not realized that if you start quoting legalese at cops they're going to be like "...".
I use some of those words but not negative. Im also prior military so it's just how I was taught how to shoot and the lingo stuck with me. This guy is acting like he is some hero that the cops should look up to.
@CoolestBean 😎 shit if someone drew a gun on me I'd probably run. I carry but I'd rather not shoot someone. I'm capable of it but I don't want that. Granted I've also deployed and I can go into shooting mode but I don't want to kill anyone. Unless I can't run and it's my only option I'd rather not shoot someone. Main takeaway: I never want to be in a position to shoot someone, the dude in the video wanted to be in a position to shoot someone.
@Matti O Yeah, I think that's the real distinction. You can usually tell the actual military and police types from the wannabes because the former are usually humble about it while the latter act like they're Batman and everyone should respect them for it.
@Hailey Hayes sorry to burst your bubble princess, but theres 249 comments here, i dgaf about whatever you are talking about here. At this point i cant even remember what this thread is about, so... why are you important again?
@carly jeffrey what America are you talking about? No data support that stupid racist assumption and anti-White racism is the norm. It's disgusting. Let's stay with facts and not blm propaganda.
@carly jeffrey Ye, I was. :thumbs up: ppl really gotta be blind to deny how much race plays into just... the history of America. :/ (Sorry if it seemed I was saying it to you, youtube comments are weird.)
@xeonic man... I guess when I get really weird looks from old white women it means nothing :) Or I guess when old white men will say something incredibly racist and then look over me and smirk it means nothing :) thanks! In fact you just solved racism! Hooray!
@Bigdumbhorsebaby He might have shot the dude partly due to his race, but I doubt he would be any less fearful of getting jail time due to the race of the victim. That is a strange way of thinking.
I don’t get why while do the same argument every time. It’s true racist will never admit they’re openly admit they’re racist so even if you say to get statistics look at what happened at the jazz game I’m pretty sure those guys tried saying they weren’t racist after saying some stupid shit that would get your teeth knocked in.
Well that's the way it went down originally suprisingly the Sheriff was not charging him and said it was a fair use of stand your ground, but the District Attorney saw otherwise which was the right decision I think.
This is one of these cases where people use as an excuse to kill people and it's a test of the law and there wasn't enough of a threat to justify a shooting. This stand your ground law needs to be more restricted and clearly defined with a minimum threshold like 'fear for your life or life of others'.
It should be where a person is brandishing a weapon or doesn't back away when you draw your gun or someone breaks into your property. Even then you've got to give a warning and chance for the perps to back off. Taking someones life or firing at such close range should really be a last resort. If he had fired a round off by the guys feet he would have backed off I bet and still be alive today.. so I think this guy misused this law.
@I_Am_Asian_But_It_Doesnt_Mean_Im_Better_Than_You ! It's is legally not self defense indeed but i can not assume racism even when i would like to assume it because outside of how he looks i do not really have other information about the guy that could say he is racist. The way he talks about things he seems to be a person that is not in control of his anger whenever something is out of place for him.
@Bigdumbhorsebaby that’s the exact opposite of reality, when someone who is white shoots a black person there’s usually media coverage and people throwing accusations that the white dude is racist and killed the black person unjustifiably...
@Koen G more likely he felt justified due to the initial assault by the husband, probably enraged, and thereafter he felt he had a strong “self defence” argument so he was safe. But as a fellow European, (Balkans, so even less familiar with white racism than Western Europe), I don’t know anymore. Everything American is somehow made about race so I just choose to not participate in most discussions anymore lol
@mutz dude the only reason he wasn't justified is because his own words showed that he wasn't in fear of his life he paused and then decided to shoot if this situation was different and he truly was in fear which could have happened then he would have been justified
@YumiGacha Poor baby have to deal with bad stares of "old white men". Not women. Not middle aged. Only old white men. You're so credible. That's racism to you? Go in a ghetto by being white, and you'll see that staring wouldn't be your bigger problem. Watch tv and see a lesbian black mayor of a city being openly racist and getting away with it.
@CiskyFCC white people racism is not only directed towards blacks but also towards other ethnicities. Racism is deep rooted in American society. Pick up any American newspaper and you'll see most of the pages filled with diatribe against other people. Denigrating non democratic governments as barbaric, depicting asian men as feminine, forcing western values on others and intervening in middle East these things are racism too. American laws are targetted towards blacks. Just because a country has woman president doesn't mean the country is feminist or favourable to women. Maybe that black woman was afraid the white man would twist her words to suit his own agenda.
We do not need data or evidence for something which is in front of our eyes.
@Lise Beeston There is no systemic racism in america, and THAT is a FACT. Definition of systemic racism is "systemic racism, is a form of racism that is embedded through laws and regulations within society or an organization. It can lead to such issues as discrimination in criminal justice, employment, housing, health care, political power, and education, among other issues" Now, EXACTLY what law or regulation within society is racist? Hint... you wont find one because it DOES NOT EXIST.
@Rob WolfleyWow, imagine claiming a country is racist and not being able to articulate reasons why you think it is. "Look around" are you serious? Give me facts as to how america is racist. "Look around" doesnt mean crap all.
@Michiah Ruby hahaha once again. Another reply from you STILL not explaining how america is racist. I have done my research which is why i know that America is not racist. You have given me absolutely no facts as to how america is racist. I specifically asked you like 3 times "how is america racist in 2021" It as if you're completely ignoring the 2021 part. Because you keep on saying how america was built on racism. Which is passed tense, and not 2021. You're side stepping the question and not answering based off of what I said. I say 2021 you talk about 1950s.
@Rob Wolfley I had to write something like "I can't wait until ignorant people like you no longer exist" or "stfu. Look around" to be "sharpest knife in the drawer", right? Nice arguments.
@CiskyFCC So how should I refer to white people? Call them Pink people or what? There's a lot of politics behind all these progressive stuff like feminism and stuff I don't want to talk about them right now. But what right do you have to tell a country to become democratic feminist and tolerant? Who gave you right to intervene in other countries internal matters? LHBT and fedos might be seen as civilized high people in American society, but other people do not hold them in high regards why must you then force them to tolerate and promote these people just like you do? White values should be confined to white societies is all I'm saying. I'm not calling America a civilized country, you assumed, because of your inherent racism, that just because I disapprove of American values I must be an uncivilized person and American values are right and civilized! You just proved my point!
Bottom line as a human being with a soul you have to know that even though I was shoved to the ground by someone that is obviously not a threat once I have my weapon drawn on him to leave well enough alone, he clearly was looking for a confrontation and he achieved his goal. Unfortunately it resulted in someone dying in front of their children. As a human you have to understand that.
@Terry Fulds Gaming this was in no way self defense when they guy had a gun against an unarmed man. Period. Your feelings have no jurisdiction here, it is the law. Learn to understand that this is a crime and how you interpret that crime and how it makes you "feel" is beyond irrelevant.
@V An unarmed person can in fact inflict grievous bodily harm or death. Which means under the right circumstances shooting an unarmed person is justifiable. There are literally dozens of cases over the years that set a precedence. The man in the video was judged by a jury of his peers so justice was met. However that doesn’t change the fact that an unarmed person can be a huge threat and people have been cleared of all charges when faced with such a threat. No matter how you feel about it that doesn’t change the law.
@carly jeffrey yeah and look at black people shoving white guys over an argument he was having. He started it. The white guy just used too much force. Black guy brought it on himself. Guy was responsible in only shooting one bullet. He didn’t try and kill the guy
@YumiGacha He didn't say racism means nothing. He said assuming every single thing happens because of racism is a close-minded approach. I don't see how this is a surprising, never told before fact to you people. Not everything is about race.
@Annie Skywalker Absolutely stupid way of thinking. Fist fight puts your life in danger even more if you lose. A gun ends the altercation all together. He shouldnt have shot, but he had every right to pull it out and force the attacker to back off. If they made any aggressive movements towards him then he had the right to shoot. Saying a rEaL mAn should have engaged in physical violence is toxic masculinity which goes to show how toxic of a person you are.
@Terry Fulds Gaming just because you are intimidated by a larger man does not mean you can kill him. He got pushed which yeah is crime but his life isn’t in danger. Proper procedure would for him to have drawn his gun and told the man to stay back. People panic and make stupid decisions like shoot a man for just pushing you. This is manslaughter, and an example of what exactly not to do when you have a sidearm.
@Dee K and get your groups out of Australia, And America Since Natives had peaceful trades with Africa and established routes and settlements before erupeans got here
@Dee K Actually in truth Eropa isn't even your land. You stole that from an ancient Dark indigenous peoples.
Edit : as far as evidence goes you guys might not even be from this planet. the people from the ice were dark too. Even though your ancient historians claim to be from the ice mountains
@Terry Fulds Gaming He shoved him because he was yelling at his wife. Is he not supposed to protect his family. He didn't even chase him after he shoved him. Mike pulled the gun out and he backed up further and he shot him. That's murder.
@Aquarius Coconut Derek only got trialed because if he didn't those riots might have continued. If there wasn't a media shitstorm he might not even be in prison at all.
@Michiah Ruby Its lovely to see you explain why media love to cover events where a white person(mostly a cop) shoot a black person, because they know they can get naive people riled up and so they get a lot of money from the clicks, one example of that is MaKhia Bryant’s shooting, a very obviously justifiable shooting that needs no coverage at all, but they still decided to cover the story and make the black person sound like the poor victim that was just a young girl that did tik toks about makeup knowing that the stupid people will buy any story that pushes the narrative of systemic racism and cops are bad, even though the girl was a criminal that tried to literally stab someone infront of a cop... And lemme clarify what I meant about media coverage of these events, the rate at which the media covers shootings that involve a white person shooting a minority(mostly black) is much higher than the opposite where a minority shoots a white person which is very obvious since they like to cover the shootings where they can attach racism to the story and they can’t do that only if the shooter is white because thats how they make money through the naive people that push the story further.
@Dee K right because you speak for all. I just wanted other people to see how fake that whole line of thinking is. You did your part. Thank you for your level of intelligence broski.
He wasn't charged at the first time actually, he got charged after the pressure from the BLM mafia. "Uuuhh.. there were no blacks in the judge", that was enough to put him in jail. That's how USA works now, without common sense.
@James Shepherd and girls who manipulate boys into killing themselves shouldn't go to jail either, after all they didn't touch anyone right? The boy committed the act on his own . That's your logic. Sick people who manipulate situations without getting their hands dirty shouldn't go to jail or prison. That's what the police proved. Was he really a concerned citizen or a jackass looking for a reason to pull a trigger. They got em
Every time he says negative instead of no, it makes me think he’s someone who wants to me police or military. He’s been waiting for someone to give him a “reason” to shoot
Wanna know the worst part. This guy would have been a self described "responsible gun owner" before this incident. I wonder how many more "responsible gun owners" there are out there that are just like this guy. Living their lives every day hoping for the day they get to use their gun.
He was getting into traffic confrontations all the way back in 2012 where people reported that he pointed a gun at them threating to shoot them. He confronted a truck driver who was parked in a handicapped spot and then called the company the guy worked for to report him and said he was lucky "he didn't blow the guys head off". Dude was just a ticking time bomb who was eventually going to shoot someone.
@Theuthras Thankfully. I would rather have a weapon to defend myself, rather than rely on the government to protect me and expect everyone to follow the law.
@MrSimram America is built on the second ammendment, disarming everybody would be practically impossible I reckon. anti-gun laws work well for places like the UK (where I live) because its been that way for a long time and our history is nothing like americas. Got to admit there are some places here that make me feel like I need a force multiplier but I dunno, I think the general lack of firearms in the public makes me feel safer and I tend to avoid dodgy areas!
@MrSimram I'm talking about it in general, not this specific situation. The criminals will always find a way to get guns whether they are illegal or not. I'd rather have one to defend myself
@Bangkok555 well, I know what youre saying, a lot of this seems to go down in London which is a complete shithole imo, luckily I live out in the country. knives etc? well Im a 6 ft 1 big ish bloke which seems to repel most evil-doers, not that I come across any where I live or go. If I had to go anywhere dodgy id take the proper precautions of course, but who needs the stress =D
@Theuthras Just a thinking : a gun doesn't kill anyone, it's the person who pull the trigger that kills. I'm in Europe and, as a husband and father, I would like to have the right to protect my familly against criminals wanting to hurt or kill them. Instead of that , by the law, if I shoot a burglar armed with a knife in my own house, I will be put on trial. Legitimate defense would be me attacking him with a knife, proportionnality !!! Do you think it's fair ?
@H Hasslinger Most people want gun REGULATION like in Canada, where I am. In Canada, it's ridiculously easy to get illegal weapons thanks to the US, yet we have way less gun crimes in proportion and way less crime in general. Requiring people to have a license to have a weapon isn't a big ask. It's easy and inexpensive to get a hunting rifle if you have good mental health and no criminal record. Same with a handgun. Sure, we can't have assault weapons but why do you need and ASSAULT weapon to DEFEND yourself? Do you expect 20 murderers to storm your house at once? Regulation just makes sure people who are untrained, irresponsible, mentally unstable or who have criminal motives have the least access to guns as possible. And as someone who has been suicidal multiple times, I'm very grateful for it.
the lady also used double standards to make her husband assault an old guy, after they parked in a handicapped spot. everyone in the situation was annoying. were not talking abt this or that, red herrings n false conclusions used to sway the jury, im sure ppl could paint u as a terrible person too, n thats literally the job of the prosecution.
@HailRider well I'm in mexico and I wish we didn't have so much gun control because you're left with nothing to defend yourself. I can tell you a shotgun or hunting rifle would not be options to defend yourself here
@Francisco Rojas I don't know why you are replying to me. I was addressing the original post with the non-verified accusations that have nothing to do with the case. Hence I say "Hearsay".
As for mexico... Eric Holder and obama didn't send you enough guns? I know, its the same thing the dummycrats want to do in the USA. They want legal owners not to have them so only criminals will have them. Every country I have been to have thriving black market arms dealers. You can get one if you want...especially in mexico. I suppose the problem you would have is that the police there are as corrupt as the politicians. We have the same problem here but currently the politicians are far more corrupt than the cops. In mexico the criminals own the cops and policians. In the USA the politicans are the criminals and they use civilina criminals to reign terror on the population and both are trying to own the cops.
@Joseph B yeah people with guns cant fight thats why military personal carry guns cuz they cant fight. Thats why cop carry guns cuz they know they cant fight.
@Felix B You need to be registered to legally own a firearm in the U.S. as well. Also, assault weapon is basically a made up term to demonize the AR 15 since it's technically not an assault rifle. I think people want it because they would like at least some form of defense in case something crazy happens like a massive riot or something. It's happened plenty of times in history, so it's not crazy to be prepared for it in the future.
Guy shouldn’t have been billy badass and pushed him from behind like that. I guess it goes both ways, things like this usually happen before the right decisions can be made. Tragedy all around
He could have been. Narrator is right if he was firm on the self defense and afraid he was going to get stomped out there's a chance he may have been let off.
@DeadArmed Even if he argued that he believed he really was going to be beaten to death, the evidence speaks for itself... Markeis McGlockton had stepped back three times, and turned around, and during that part of the interaction, several seconds passed. These facts nullify even the most bold self-defense argument.
@sokami He may not have gotten off completely free, but I'm sure a decent lawyer could've gotten him a significantly more lenient sentence. People can over-react with extreme, irrational fear, which could've been the argument if Michael didn't casually ramble on to police for two hours. I mean, I don't think he was truly scared for his life when he pulled the trigger, but I'm also not convinced he truly wanted to just kill a guy. Although, it does seem from his history that he likes to look for conflicts and in this interview he shows his boldness is just due to his firearm. It's most likely that he finally got the encounter he "wanted" and just got tunnel-visioned into the scenario he always played out in his head and couldn't adapt when the scenario changed.
@Ricky Janzen Exactly. He was a wannabe 'Murican hero who deliberately went out of his way to find an excuse to shoot someone. No one in their right mind would believe he shot him out of fear after looking at the evidence. I mean, the guy even had a record prior to this.
@Ricky Janzen this. I don't know if many people are ever consciously walking around thinking to themselves "I'm gonna find a black guy and kill him first chance I get." it's probably a minimally conscious thought process, it's moreso a matter of patterns of behavior, aggression and racial bias all coming together to get them to pop off. I mean it is effectively "I'm a time bomb for a black guy to give me the chance" for these people, but a lot of them probably have no idea they are racist and aggressive.
I disagree. Those jokes were nervous and initiated by police to relax him into his eventual confession. His feigning an injury suggests he believed there would be doubt cast over his report. The police did a great job relaxing him to the point of confession.
7:49 The way he says "She took that as an affront" tells you everthing about this disgusting man. How dare a young, Black woman not do exactly as he said.
"The true victim" (who's pulled a gun on 2 other people) shot some one for shoving him. A natural reaction for a man who sees his wife being berated by another man.
LOL at the cop telling him he doesn’t know what “force multiplier” means. It just goes to the guy’s state of mind that he thinks he’s talking cop language, when the cop is just making him spell it out and sound like a weeb.
@Jeremy Jolivet lol what? The victim went out to defend his partner from this lunatic. Who's to say if he would have shot the woman before the victim pushed him? Plus did you see the video? The victim, and a bystander both reacted simultaneously when the maniac pulled out his gun. The victim took a step back when he saw the gun, he was no longer a threat and the gun toting Yahoo didn't need to shoot.
He wanted to be a hero that day and start trouble. I stand by my comment.
@Jeremy Jolivet the fact that he’s out there yelling/going back & forth with a woman about a parking space at a business he doesn’t own. Safe to safe if he knew how to mind his business, none of that ever occurs. You don’t seem to grasp that concept though.
But go ahead, go try it yourself, defend a parking space that doesn’t need your protection and see who loves you for it.
Also, funny how you forget to mention the other people that came forward confessing he pulled guns on them, so who’s to say he didn’t have that in mind as well had the man not shown up to protect his family from a lunatic with a gun 🤷🏾♂️
Sounds like it? He’s on video looking for trouble! He’s a guy with nothing better to do in his life than to enforce parking rules, something NOBODY asked him to do, and someone died because of it.
The true crime here is all of the grammatical errors in the comment feed " ambarass" come on people... This guy was a lunatic looking to play a "hero".
Too be fair the person who started the fight is the man who was shot, Michael is guilty of overreacting with deadly force to a non deadly threat. But the fact still remains he did not start the physical altercation.
@Derek aka Derek Yes it's wrong that they parked in a disabled spot, but that doesn't mean Marquis had to die for it. Drejka himself parked illegally. Plus Drejka was in no place to police it Brittany parking in a disabled spot. Either let the business know or, you know, call the actual police? This could have been resolved without anyone dying or going to prison for.
@The Helghast did nothing wrong Drejka was loud and aggressive with Brittany. He was arguing with her about parking illegally while he parked illegally. Brittany's boyfriend was defending her, simple. If someone is in your partners face, being loud and aggressive, while your kids are present, what would you do? Drejka didn't need to shoot. Once he pulled out the gun, Marquis stepped back. He was no longer a threat.
@Covidescapeslvl4biolab-this mask will stop it Why so angry, Lucy? Relax. Drejka was aggressively arguing with Brittany about parking in a disabled spot while he himself had parked illegally.
Secondly, he was being loud and aggressive with Brittany while her kids were with her (according to witness accounts). All he had to do was be nice about it, "excuse me miss, do you mind moving your car as this is a disabled spot?" - if that doesn't work, notify the business owner or police. Marquis came out to defend her as Drejka was moving in closer and closer.
When Drejka pulled out his gun, Marquis immediately stepped back, as you said. Threat gone. No need to shoot.
Michael Drejka was in no place to police them for parking in the spot. That's not his job. He wanted to start trouble that day. If it wasn't them, it could have been someone else.
@repsandgrooves you mention 'agressively arguing' - That's not against the law actually. You can argue with words on an agressive tone and still do nothing wrong but being a nuisance maybe. The assault however was against the law. Why mention aggression when the man only used words, kept his distance from the car too...
Also just to make things clear where i stand: the shooting was unjustifiable and therefor manslaughter.
@repsandgrooves You cannot physical assault someone for yelling, the way I see it, the unarmed man escalated a verbal conflict to a physical conflict and the other man in turn escalated it from a physical conflict to a use of lethal force. Both men unnecessarily escalated the fight beyond what they were permitted to do under the law. If you play silly games and throw your weight around you are bound to pick a fight with someone willing it escalate things to the death.
He played a silly game thinking because he was big he could assault people for offending him or yelling, and he paid the price. They both did and good riddance to them both.
Here in Australia we have laws called one punch laws, throwing someone onto the concrete on their back has killed many people here initiating these laws. Don't down play what marquis did, he played games by shoving people around and it was just a matter of time before a person he shoved around was a coward willing to shoot him over it.
@AwoudeX I agree that the push was an assault, but being in that moment where Drejka was close to his girlfriend, and with Drejka being loud-likely saying nasty things to her, a push probably saved her life, but cost him his. If a man was in my woman's being loud and aggressive to her, I'd push him hard, too.
@The Helghast did nothing wrong I'm Australian too, mate. I agree Marquis pushing Michael is an assault. But in that situation, a man much bigger than his girlfriend was being verbally aggressive, and moving in closer to the car. Who knows what Michael would have done to Brittany when she stepped out of the car? When Marquis came out and saw that, his first instinct would have been to distance Michael from her. I've been in situations where I've pushed others off my mates during a situation. Mate, in games of league punches flew, I tell you. But that happens in moments oh heat and adrenaline.
Both men we're wrong in their actions, but Drejka pulling the trigger was very unnecessary. And he even parked illegally to have a go at then parking illegally. He just wanted trouble.
@AwoudeX heat of the moment, mate. Seeing a man much bigger than his girlfriend standing in her face would have trigger the response to push him away.
We can clearly see that Marquis took a step back immediately after the gun was drawn. His reaction was simultaneous with the other person heading to their car. Once the gun was out, Marquis was no longer a threat. The trigger should not have been pulled.
I'm not saying Marquis pushing Michael was right. Neither was Michael in getting out of his car to begin the altercation. If Michael minded his own business, nothing would have happened. If people have a problem with illegal parking, report it. Simple.
@AwoudeX remember that Michael had pulled his gun on others before this incident. So he's not afraid to use his gun, and he wanted to use it. Watch the video again
the dude stood so far away from the car that she could open the door easily and step out, what she did at the exact moment her man came into her vision. There was no threat, there was no heat of the moment except heated words and heated words aren't cause to start shoving people that are keeping their distance. On one side you have this guy shoving without just cause and on the other side you have someone shooting without just cause. You defend the one and not the other. I'd like you on my side and defend neither. Shoving is an escalation of a verbal conflict into a physical one. In this case an eye for an eye made someone DEAD. Or more accurate a NOTHING for a SHOVE for a SHOOTING. One dead, one for the better part of the rest of his life to rot in prison and another robbed of the father of her children. Eliminate the shoving and you have NOTHING of all these escalations and nothing would have happened other than words exchanged.
Also he made it his business to call out bad behavior in others without immediately reporting it to the police. What kind of world do you want, where people always resort to the most draconic measure of involving the government in something what we as a society should be able to take care of just by ourselves? I mean what kind of dick parks there? No empathy for the disabled? I would have briefly adressed it as i would consider it everybody's business, including mine. I don't wanna live in a community where assholes get away with making life harder for the more vulnerable in society. You seem to skip over this part a bit. Probably a heat of the moment thing again, lol, disregarding everything because you never learned to controll yourself, which is VERY important if you want a civil society. This case clearly proves that much.
@repsandgrooves I've watched and i've been disgusted at the time it took between the shopper walking away and him pulling the trigger. It was ages in my opinion. Nobody would be able to safely drive a car if they would need that much time making decisions and estimating situations. I also was well aware of him pulling his gun in other cases, however he had no history of shooting anyone and on top of that, it was holstered, so what point are you making here? Could the dead guy read his mind? Did he know him? More wild assumptions are welcome, i'm always up for some entertainment
@repsandgrooves You cannot physically assault someone for what "They might do" for the same reason he was arrested for shooting someone for what "he might do"
If someone was physically assaulting his wife it would be a whole other dynamic.
The examples you gave you state punches flew, and in that case that is the right time to defend yourself or your loved ones, shoving someone onto their back because they are being verbal is not ok.
Again I am defending neither party, I am glad Michael went to prison and hope he enjoys his stay, but if you go around shoving people for stupid shit like arguing you are bound to meet someone like Michael or some wannabe hardass who is willing to take your life over it.
Same applies to road rage, yeah 99 percent of the time you might get away with it, but one day you will meet that person who will happily chase you down, run you off the road and then beat you half to death.
Blind siding the guy wasn’t really called for. Shooting him wasn’t justified at all. But touching another person based on there words to you is an escalation of a verbal altercation. Always try to deescalated. Worst thing that can happen is it doesn’t work but at least try.
@repsandgrooves he has dreamt of beeing a hero for sure, he thought of beeing a justicer this time but i still trust him partially, under panick he could have "seen" him move (that phantom puch you avoid in boxing sometimes when you take a hit). it's always easier to relive the moment and do the right actions afterward but in the moment it's always harder... but it still doesn't justify his actions, a hit to the knee or leg would have been kinda ok i guess but aiming to the chest and shooting with two had stabilized is clearly over intensive use of force... to me the real problem is guns in the usa, with a knife it would probably not have been a manslaughter
Re Tard sorry to engage with you mr. troll, but I’m genuinely curious about something. Is “moon cricket” a racial epithet or something you made up? It’s astonishing the amount of slurs people have cooked up over the years.
oh nina, the perfect politic talk...plz raise your male kids or familys male kids not to act like ''marquis'' and try to hit ppl hard enough to kill them when they are old...hear too many of u talk cant do but will judge... and that comment...sounds like the late late show on too many pills and coke.. ''disrespecting ''what'?? nobody could have thought that up... anyways..luck when somebody drags u into the car or something...
Actually, that kid went and actually became a US soldier and I believe he did a tour. lol THAT KID is the legit shit. This dude aint shit compared to that future soldier. God bless him. lol
So basically he is threatening me with signing up with the military, going to Afghanistan, killing a couple of civilians, get PTSD, becoming homeless for being a "hero" of the states, and then what, in a drunken state of psykomode remember me in his childhood and kill me? Respect.
@Carmody Yo, I did, you're totally right, I got fuckin jebaited by the clickbait title and didn't actually watch the video to confirm the info. Took me all of 5 seconds after clicking that link to see verified footage of an actual interview with him and.... he most certainly is NOT in the army.... lmfaooo... I fuckin died laughing at how goddamn WRONG I was hahaha. Like I was the absolute farthest from correct I think I've ever been on a statement right there lmaoo. Like the total opposite of an army soldier. Thank you for setting me straight man, Im'a reply to my comment for the other people who upvoted it. Appreciate chu man.
Yo, downvote my shit here, cuz its totally 100% incorrect. He DID NOT join the army... It appears as if he may have had some kind of head injury sometime in his life, as will be apparent if you look up the actual interview.. XD lmao (jokes)
Levi Hackerman2022-05-05 15:04:46 (edited 2022-05-05 15:32:46 )
"You know terminologies we don't" lol. PS: He was angry, thats why he shot him imo. His pride was injured when he got knocked on his ass while playing the vigilante. Moral of the story, you don't shoot people, EVER. Especially if you're a father.
@Hunter Flowerson I thought the same thing, soon as I started watching this I almost turned it off cuz I was sooooo pisssssed when I heard he was all good cuz the “stand your ground” law so I didn’t even wanna watch this. But I double checked... and I guess eventually they did. Bastard got 20 years !!!!!!!!! I WAS AMAZED!!!!!!! What george Zimmerman did was 10x worse and he got no time, in the same state
@Laura Rowland don’t be an idiot. Zimmerman was getting his brains bashed against the concrete. Zimmerman killed his perpetrator in self defense, this guy shot his attacker after the perpetrator stopped the aggression.
@Map Led a suspicious thug? Oh I forgot it don’t matter how old a child is, if he’s black he’s a thug 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️ No that LITTLE BOY was being followed by a suspicious thug, after the 911 operators told him not too. He is no different than every karen we see on camera not minding his business. Lmao man, the racism. A young boy buys some skittles and walks home, and now he’s a suspicious thug. Lmao okay buddy
I can appreciate self defense, but a good gun owner has a responsibility to everyone around them to make the right decision when exercising that defense. Gandalf sad it best. "True courage is not knowing when to take a life, but when to spare one."
Just wanna point out that the prosecutor’s explanation of beyond reasonable doubt doesn’t hold. Innocent until proven guilty. When you wake up and see the neighborhood soaked you immediately assume it rained whether you saw clouds, heard thunder, smelled rain, or none of those things. So what must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt is that the helicopter dumped water over the neighborhood.
Part of this I'm sure had to do with the cordialness of the officers at first, which may have given him the idea that they were "on his side"... at least until he dug himself too deep with explanations.
This is why you should avoid confrontation. Not because being confrontational is inherently wrong, but because there are way too many nut jobs out there who just want an excuse to kill someone.
Nah, none of that would’ve happened if the other guy didn’t push him for talking. He’s in the wrong first, then this guy is in the wrong. Obviously the shooter is more wrong but this wouldn’t have happened if the guy didn’t push
@BlenderBanana I wouldn’t go up and push them I was just step in between and ask what’s happening while being assertive yet deescalating at the same time. Done it many times
@Christian DeltoroCounterpoint: it also wouldn't have happened if the guy didn't start something with a gun and shoot at the unarmed guy as he was retreating.
I don’t think Michael was a nut job. I just think he was mistaken about self defense laws and got it wrong. He thought it was justifiable when it wasn’t (there was no risk to life and it wasnt his last resort). Unfortunately once he pulled that trigger there’s no going back.
Only in the USA , avoiding the confrontation will not be a long term solution . Come here in Canada , we don't have these problem , and the main problem i see here is not humain poor judgement , but the easy possibility that anyone can carry a weapon . Take the weapon off the situation before hands , and we have no murder, and no case .
Since when is justified "confrontation" assaulting someone from behind? This story would be very different if the pushed guy had hit his head hard. Sure, he overreacted a LOT but you can't call the other guy innocent either, he also overreacted
That's exactly why I let more people than I probably should act like a tough guy bc it's just not worth it. You never kno what can happen and I'm especially more logical since I have kids now. Especially this guy being in his 40s and starting drama like just go in the store and keep your comments to yourself man! He's carrying a gun and most people that carry a gun for "self defense" are either looking for trouble and just looking for any reason to shoot or in my honest opinion they are deathly afraid in general!
@BlenderBanana I'm not starting off with slamming the person to the ground as hard as I can.... This is the reaction if you came out of the store on he was actively beating the woman right there in front of you.
@BlenderBanana He was using words. Stick and stones… it’s part of being a civil person. I wouldn’t aggressively assault someone for blabbing at someone I care about. And it doesn’t have to be a woman like you characterize.
disagreed, both are in the wrong, the first guy went too far pushing the other guy, he was mad at the woman for illegally parking in a handicap spot which is understandable the first guy made it a confrontation by pushing the man but the second man is definitely also in the wrong for shooting him.
@KoKoNutt The guy was illegally parked himself & had previous incidents of pulling out his gun in road rage incidents. The guy was a psycho badgering a woman & child over a parking space that did not impact him.
Well someone yelling to my gf for over 5 minute is reason enought for a push..if hes too weak to be able to stand up and first reflex is to shot..then ye put that nutjob in jail for a while..he initiated the confrontation.
@Penguin of Death Nobody is defending the shooter, the point is that you don't just randomly assault people even if they are being annoying for the simple reason that they can be a maniac with a gun. If that guy didn't push him and simply got in his car and left, he'd be alive right now, but because he wanted to be a big alpha male beating up the guy bothering his girlfriend now he's dead, that's all.
@dhvyse he wasn't in the right, he parked in a handicap spot like a POS and then through someone on the ground for confronting him and his girlfriend about it.
I don’t live in the states or anything, but I feel as if anyone were able to holster a weapon where ever, it makes peoples naturally aggressive. I don’t know, but I still don’t want to make excuses for this guy cause he looks like he just wanted trouble.
@moneyball32 The guy who murdered the other guy simply spoke. don't pretend like thats on the same level as someone introducing violence by pushing someone. Thats just dumb.
@BlenderBanana I wouldn't knock them on their ass as my first action, no. People downplaying the stupidity of that are being dishonest. It's AS ridiculous to use that amount of force about a conversation AS it was for Drejka to shoot him after he was backing up. Both were extremely stupid levels of escalating force beyond what situation called for. Except the first one didn't kill anyone. There's a world where Drejka collapses and hits his head and dies if he's an older man and you shove him like that. Equally stupid actions. Just one had worse consequences AS it played out, that's all.
@Skelly Scary Why would you say that? I have not found a single clue towards any racist ideas in any of Christian Deltoro's comments. The only two people I've seen bring race up in this discussion are you and another person to blame Christian for racism. He's just saying that agressive overreaction is a bad thing, on both sides. Both guys overreacted, each time bringing the conflict to a worse level. Obviously the shooter is wrong for shooting this guy and it is very sad that had to happen. But not overreacting on either side could have prevented all this.
@Christian Deltoro while there are definitely people that don't understand what they're talking about at all. Reacting to them by calling them the true racist social justice warrior children looking for the next enemy..does just as much harm, if not more, as the misunderstanding they originally had. It fuels that possible mentality of an enemy in every comment, and that hurts everyone involved. Things are changing very very quickly, compared to how stagnant things were for a long time. It makes sense there's confusion and anger, some of which might be directed at the wrong target. I appreciate your effort to have a rational conversation, but instead of trying to explain why they're wrong. Find a common ground you can agree on first. Like the planet burning more each day, or pollution killing our environments. We should ALL be on the same side there(yet some people are not). After you've realized you aren't that different, then bring up the uglier topics. Much less chance for aggression on both sides, who knows, you may learn something new about them and their life.
No, this is why you should have laws that stop the mentally unstable from owning guns, let alone carrying them around. And the main reason for this is to stop them from getting hot-headed and killing someone over a trivial f*cking incident in a car park.
Would Drejka have used a knife if he didn't have a gun? Maybe, but it's a lot less likely because using a knife, even against an unarmed person, requires that you get within striking distance so you might end up getting a beating instead. That's if Drejka even has the balls to fight at all, there's a reason he chose a gun over intelligent conversation.
And no, avoiding confrontation just means the bullies get whatever they want. The problem here is not that there was an conflict, the problem is that Drejka had a gun.
@Christian Deltoro The victim shouldn't have shoved the shooter, no.... but its hardly justification for shooting him. Every bar fight, every street tussle, every sporting event where fans get a little too drunk and raucous would end in a fatal shooting if we all thought that.
Or maybe you just don’t go up to someone in that way, push them. I teach how to more appropriately confront and it can be done in much more beneficial ways.
@Koba no, and i don’t appreciate those words. I’m saying all could have been different in how they chose conflict. Of course he didn’t deserve to be shot.
Think so as well. Why push a man to the ground? I would never do that just because someone says something i dont like. He got punished for that pretty hard. Wayy too hard of course, by our law and standards. But in other countries or other times: being that aggressive and disrespectful often meant death.
Or you could vote for regulation that would prevent stuff like this... This usually never happens where I live because people cant just walk around with weapons just because they are Fing cowards and cant handle regular life and act like their little town is Mogadishu or something.
@BlenderBanana doesnt matter if theyre “harassing your wife” if they are standing at a distance and using words and you walk up and initiate violent force, you are the aggressor. Violent force can only justifiably be used to stop violence or the imminent threat of violence. You being furious at someone is not a justified reason to assault them.
@BlenderBanana why do you feel compelled to bring race into this conversation? No one said anything about race or anyone being a thug until you showed up.
@moneyball32 true that he didnt have to confront the woman about where she parked, but Michael didn’t initiate violence, but he certainly escalated it after the other man initially assaulted him.
@Alex bellamy shoving someone to the ground could be considered deadly force, people have been pushed or punched and hit their head on the concrete and died.
@Josh Bowen The person I was replying to called the Murdered man a "Thug", which in America has been a Racial-Designator since the 80's. See, "Trayvon Martin", or "Breonna Taylors Boyfriend for examples of the right villifying the victems by refering to them as such.
As to the element of race, on the subject of Micheal Drejka (and his interraction during interregotation), pretending that it did not play a role in the decisions leading to this foolishness is either disengenuous or naieve.
@BlenderBanana i didnt see the thug comment maybe they deleted it, and what michael say that suggested that race was a factor? I must’ve missed that part.
No. This is why you shouldn't put your hands on people. That guy assaulted him and got what was coming to him. He got assaulted right back for his trouble.
This case is right on the borderline of legal justifiable homicide (the illegal side). Drejka was assaulted. Had Drejka a fallen and cracked his skull open and died, something not impossible with that hard of a push, MgGlockton would have been the one facing murder charges. Had the incident played out the same but Drejka not fired MgGlockton probably would be charged with assault. Personally if the attack was completely unprovoked I would feel Drejka is justified regardless of the law. However here he put himself in a situation that is going to escalate a good percentage of the time, and the coward is carrying a gun showing here he's ready to use it without hesitation. Do I think MgGlockton got what was coming to him? Yes that is my initial reaction to the assault. But you can't go instigating and shooting everyone violent bully you encounter.
@Josh Bowen No, they did not delete it. It is an inference from his description of the incident; in which he justifies Micheal Drejka's behavior as a rational response to "being attacked".
Yeah this dude was looking for trouble and he felt an inflated sense of confidence because he legally cared a firearm. People really need to understand the carry laws and potential trouble they come with before taking that step
@Cory C This case is not close to legally justifiable homicide (I'm a lawyer, I would know). He shot him as he was walking away. He was in no danger. Shooting him while he was being rushed would be another story.
@BlenderBanana hey man welcome to America. Here it's actually perfectly legal to criticize someone for illegally parking in a handicapped spot, and in this country we've decided that people should be able to voice such an opinion without fear of being physically assaulted.
@Christian Deltoro If we're going to play the finger pointing game, he confronted a lone women over parking in a handicapped space in an empty parking, starting the conflict. Parking in that spot is inconsiderate and illegal, but it didn't personally effect him and certainly didn't warrant his reaction.
@Daniel Flanard if his mom that is handicapped was there, which she is frequently he says, then it would’ve affected him, so he’s trying to be considerate for others in the situation. What he did to start with was ok in everyone’s book. The other guy came in way aggressive and escalated shit. They could’ve gone about their ways if he hadn’t pushed like that. People are inconsiderate to everyone else. They shouldn’t have been parked there at the end of the day and thought they were entitled to it. So no, try again pal
@Christian Deltoro By that logic Drejka instigated the whole thing by approaching a young mother in her car who was not bothering anyone while armed with a gun.
@Christian Deltoro Sure, how about the several seconds in which he hesitated to pull the trigger after effectively making the threat dissolve. Brandishing a gun in a moment of panic is a justifiable escalation, and it works very well because most people don't want to die over a meaningless dispute, as displayed by the deceased. Since he didn't fire immediately, he had no reason to fire several seconds later once is was obvious that the attacker was backing off. There's also parking illegally to argue with someone about parking illegally, the length and nature of the altercation which ultimately didn't help anyone who would've needed the spot, and in conjunction with the second point, his calm composure during the interrogation. He lost his temper over the misuse of a parking space but was collected after killing someone. Have you really considered the kind of man you're defending?
@Daniel Flanard you’re arguing with yourself here bud, nobody disagreeing with you, in fact I’ve already stated all of this previously. You on the other hand are trying to deny what I’m saying is right and justify your own shit. Read before speaking because you talking to your self at this point.
@Christian Deltoro You have been dumping the blame on the victim since your first comment, so no, you haven't said the same things boyo; you won't condemn the shooters actions. Anyone who views a bruised ass and a bruised ego as grounds to take someone's life is a little nutty. They say my generation is the morally bankrupt one, good grief.
Or don't be a thug and park in handi-cap parking spot if your not handi-cap and don't push someone to ground or attack them for yelling at you for breaking law like wtf common sense. Thug got shot for it and died end of story stand your ground why he got sentenced for man slaughter is beyond me.
@Brett K he got sentenced for manslaughter because he was guilty of manslaughter. I don't think you understand stand your ground laws as well as you think you do.
@BlenderBanana He didn't know what was going on with the conversation. He ran up & escalated things by pushing this guy. He deserved something bad to happen but white dude with the gun overreached on what was allowed in this circumstance. For one thing, when you shove someone unexpectantly that hard onto the concrete, you can easily kill them if they hit their head. His butt should have been in jail but maybe not in the ground
They're both unlikable character, though one more so than the other. Don't park in the handicap space without a sticker. Be more polite when talking to someone. Don't use violence to escalate things. Don't kill someone.
@Christian Deltoro Given the facts in this case, this was not a justification for self defense with deadly force. Yea he pushed him and when Mike drew his weapon the attacker backed up and disengaged. He is no longer the aggressor. It pays to know when and when not shoot.
A certain 17 year old did it best in Wisconsin, especially after fending off his 3rd and final attack, the others backed off and slowly backed away from him when he presented his weapon in their direction. Had he shot those people backing away from him, he would be in prison right now.
@BlenderBanana he could have died from being pushed over by hitting his head. no rational person would push like that, even if they were "talking" to your family
@BlenderBanana but your accusing them of racism and using a euphemism for “thug” simply because they said that he was not justified in assaulting the guy. Thats why i believe you are making it about race when no one else had made it about race before you entered the conversation.
@BlenderBanana im not favoring the man who shot him at all. And you cannot legally defend someone’s dignity with the use of violent force. Theres nothing racial about it. If someone is threatening the dignity of your loved on you are not legally allowed to use violence to defend your loved ones dignity. If you say that its wrong to use violence against a bon violent person that doesn’t make you a racist. What youre trying to do is pull out the race card so that anything you say automatically becomes truth because if someone disagrees then they’re a Racist.
@Josh Bowen I am saying Micheal Drejka was relying upon racism for the hope of being permitted to manufacture a murder,
And I am refrencing a pattern in Christians Delonto's accussation, that justifies Drejka's behavior by forcing the murdered man into an archetype as old as America's Caste System; that has been developed in such a way that calling the murdered man "a thug" is as unesscary, as calling him by the "traditional slur".
@BlenderBanana thats your opinion. I dont see any evidence that race was a determining factor in any of this. The only evidence you have of racism being a factor is that the man is white.
@Strange Universe if that was your understanding from everything I said, then there’s no having a rational conversation with you because nowhere did I say that. Have a good day, stay ignorant
@BlenderBanana Sorry, but having a hot temper isn't a justification for assaulting somebody. You don't have a right to hurt ppl because they say mean things to you or a loved one lol. If you can't control your temper and approach things calmly and rationally, then you have a lot of growing up to do. A man with no self-control is no man at all. Neither of these men displayed such qualities, and now one is dead and one in prison. 99.9% of the time you reap what you sow. 99% of alllll the bad things that happen to you are things you've brought upon yourself in some way.
@BlenderBanana he didnt provoke a fight. he was arguing verbally. then he was pushed hard, which could have killed him. people die from hitting their heads on the ground. you cant take earlier stuff into account or else they would talk about how saint geroge floyd was a career criminal
@saguirre760 So you’re saying that people in these neighborhoods are inherently violent? I mean those are your words not mine you’re saying it in the suburbs you can talk to someone like an adult but in “these neighborhoods” that shit won’t fly so you’re telling me that they are inherently violent people huh
@Kenny Phelps I had to reread my post as I forgot the context of what your post was. People in neighborhoods are aggressive. Same can be said of certain people in suburbs who take out their guns when a mouse farts. In most rough neighborhoods if you’re disrespecting someone’s wife don’t be surprised if you get a two piece to the face. It would be well deserved. By this opinion/post of yours it sounds like you think it was ok for the murderer to shoot the victim. I was on the fence with this case but JCS clearly explains the reasons why he was arrested, charged, and convicted. If the shooter would have minded his own business, the victim would be alive, the victim’s child would have a father, and the murderer would be out free.
@BlenderBanana lol why do you keep deleting your comments? How is he racist saying they’re both in the wrong. Obviously the shooter went way over the line.
@BlenderBanana The laziest response I have ever seen lol. "YOure RACist!"
I would have walked up and probably yelled at drejka, not pushed.
The guy shouldn't have been violent from the start of the confrontation, but the other guys shouldn't have harassed the mom in the car, and should have never pulled the gun. getting pushed =/= shooting. period. but to say they couldn't handle this differently, or that they both went to an aggressive option is simply not looking at the facts. drejka was obviously a monster that killed someone though.
@BlenderBanana you should calmly step in and ask if everything is okay and what's going on. Wouldn't it be best to remain calm and slowly try and edge towards the store or where people that are able to help can help. Its tricky, there no way to safely go about this. I would just avoid confrontation at all costs because mfs will be carrying and find any reason to cry about self defense
@BlenderBanana you should calmly step in and ask if everything is okay and what's going on. Wouldn't it be best to remain calm and slowly try and edge towards the store or where people that are able to help can help. Its tricky, there no way to safely go about this. I would just avoid confrontation at all costs because mfs will be carrying and find any reason to cry about self defense
@Christian Deltoro nah, none of this would've happend if the US were a normal country with normal guns laws, not a crazy place full of toddlers that can buy guns at walmart.
@Christian Deltoro this guy has a history of pulling his gun, he probably would have pulled it even if the guy didn't push him, also avoiding confrontation would be not pushing the guy because he clearly likes pulling out his gun on people which is what the original comment was saying
Comments are stupid, yea he “shouldnt have” pushed Drejka , but drejka shouldnt have pulled up, parked and started harassing his wife for no reason, like the whole thing couldve been avoided completely due to drejka which is why people are more critical of him (+ the fact that he killed the dude for no reason. Someone pushes you push back lol guns make weak people feel strong )
Kantanen Akseli He would have seen it coming if he would have been aware of his surroundings or better yet not actively verbally assaulting the guys girlfriend 🤦♂️
@Alyx Coe protecting his woman from what ? Getting her feelings hurt slightly ? Over a guy asking about a parking space ???? HOW SENSITIVE CAN YOU GUYS BE 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
19 minutes isn’t too bad. I live in a rural area and the ranch I work at had an emergency once that took an hour and a half for any first responders to show up. We got lucky and the guy recovered fully in a few months
@Cody Ginther a gas station is gonna be located in town though, it's not exactly like they're out by the farms. I think a country as wealthy as America has a moral obligation to better subsidize adequate emergency services in rural and low income areas -- it's not fair people die because they lived in the wrong zip code. Obviously in rural areas, you're gonna have to leave the area for specialized/intensive care, but it's not like people in rural areas don't get shot or don't get mangled in equipment. To not even be able to get basic emergency response to a gas station within 20 minutes? It's embarrassing to be American at this point with how bad of a job we're doing. I mean, what if there'd been a fire??
@mmmk america is super spread out, idk where your from but i think it’s easy to underestimate that, there’s gas stations out in the middle of nowhere here
@mmmk wealth has nothing to do with ambulance times. Do you not understand the size of that country? every single town is different in that country, some ambulances will arrive quickly, others will be delayed. What is your comment?
@Derrick Oneal This happened in Clearwater. It's not rural, and it's not spread out. There are parts of Pinellas County that are both, but not Clearwater. It's a tech, tourism and Scientology town. They also host MLB spring training. There's no excuse for that response time. There are level 1 trauma centers in the same county. They could have sent a helicopter FFS. GSW to the chest is level 1.
I see that somebody has commented that it's still ridiculous that it took 20 mins because it's not that type of area.. but I live in a small town. It's 35 mins away from any hospitals/medical care of any type but we still have a couple gas stations.
@quicksilver b did this occur in a small town area away from hospitals? NO Stop making that comparison. Did you even watch the video. It clearly says where the incident took place
@Lebaron Jim I literally said that in my comment that somebody else already commented saying that wasn't the case in this specific situation. I merely said it is possible because another commenter said it wasn't. But it is if you live in that type of area. If you actually read you would know that, it's already been acknowledged. So thanks for your pointless comment.
@quicksilver b They werent in an unpopulated area. I wouldnt have made the comment i did if they were. The end. You act like its some revelation that if people live out in the sticks medical services will take longer. No shit Sherlock
I was thinking this too but remembered that police usually are required to be sure there is no longer a threat before paramedics can arrive. So I’m sure some of that time is the police clearing the scene
Even 5 mins wouldn't have saved him with the equipment they have, as he got shot in the lung and heart and as the prosecutor said "Perfect (kill) shot" I dont think anything could have saved him, sadly.
It's not ideal, I waited an hour on the phone while I was in anaphalaxis once when I lived ten minutes drive away from a hospital. Resources are horribly stretched
@mmmk The video also said that it happened at 3:30 PM and doing a quick Google search, 11 minutes is the best right now. There's also the fact that paramedics can't just teleport to their ambulance meaning they wouldn't start moving right away. Another factor is that it takes time for a 911 call to be made and an ambulance to be dispatched. Okay now imagine all of these things and it's the afternoon and there is tons of traffic, it makes perfect sense why it'd be 19 minutes but you don't seem to care about the reality of the situation, you just wanted to use this perceived wrongdoing (which it isn't) to complain.
@Dan Nah. The standard for response times is that 90% of ambulance response times should be under 13 minutes, and for fire departments (which almost always respond to medical calls as well) under 6 minutes. It's absurd to think 20 minutes is fine.
@literal antifa terrorist "standard response time" doesn't mean much when, as stated by an above commenter, the physical distance between the nearest hospital and the gas station takes 11 minutes to travel with idea traffic. Plus dispatch and preparation time. 19 minutes is reasonable
Its worth noting that Paramedics wont arrive to the scene until Police have cleared the area from any potential danger. This makes sense, considering there have been cases as recently as earlier this year when Paramedics have been attacked and even killed by their patients or by unrelated bystanders.
My wife grew up on the Navajo Nation. The Indian Health Services ambulance is notorious for taking forever to respond due to lack of staffing and the remote nature of the reservation. Her grandma fell out at her ranch a few years back, i called the dispatch and they told me it would be 45 minutes to an hour. We had to meet them half way with my father in laws truck, flagged then down as they approached and they took her to the closest IHS hospital in Tuba City.
(Depending on the part of town) it's not. When I was younger and still with my ex husband I used to live in the worst part of town in my area and the cops barely even go near it because it's so fucked up. So when someone is being hurt or robbed IF the cops show up it will be quite a while before they get there. It's fucked up but true. In a way I get it but at the same time it's like... Your cops. You're supposed to put your life on the line for others. That's the whole purpose of them so... Do your fuckin job, y'know?
@Derrick Oneal Russia is spread out, half the population, more than double the area. The reason as to why it takes emergency services so much time to reach a shot person in USA is because that shot person is not the only one.
ambulances have to get clearance from law enforcement before they are allowed to enter the scene and help the victim!!! only fireman and police are allowed on the scene for like the first 30 minutes atleast
@mmmk I don't think it's a funding issue, it's a logistics issue. We don't know the circumstances that caused the ambulance to take that long, but I don't think throwing more money at it would fix anything unless there was a shortage of medical personnel/vehicles/locations. But adding more ambulances to a crowded city doesn't make them get to their destinations any faster.
America is pretty spread out yes, at the same time we do have places that highly condensed. That means traffic, foot, bicycle and car. Like i remember that just in the early 2000s emergency services put out that they would follow speed limits and basically safely drive slightly faster than you. That's because we ended up getting more traffic and sometimes chases, rescue and fire emergency and other wrecks happen because of it.
@Memecream You're right, but 19 minutes is inexcusable. We don't know the circumstances, maybe something happened that caused it to take that long but even with condensed traffic they control it.
@Memecream false, EMS/Fire is allowed to exceed speed limits when responding to emergency calls. We still have to proceed with caution and we are not allowed to fly through red lights and stop signs. There is a law called Due Regard that basically states that a driver of a rescue truck or fire apparatus can be held liable if he or she drives like an asshole and gets in an accident.
Here in the Netherlands there is a rule that an ambulance should be present at the scene within 6 minutes. Any place, any time of day. No matter how rural
@Jappie That's because the Netherlands is a better country than America, in pretty much every conceivable way. But Americans will ignore this fact and continue to declare that they have "the best response time in the world" lmao
@Keep crying There’s a difference between calling an ambulance and calling in a chopper to be airlifted out. In rural towns airlifting patients is a very common thing especially how far away the hospital is and the severity of the emergency.
@mmmk you know, there is no illimited supply of ambulance, and person to drive the so called ambulance. Also trafic can be a bitch. Also sometimes what take the longer time, is just to take the phone call that lead to the ambulance rushing at the place of the tragedy. People often are to panic to answer the question correctly. Sometimes they don't listen the question you have to ask them, or they can even protest and waste some time before actually answering. When a bullet is fire at someone, there is no automatic bat signal that appears in the air. Most of the time the blame for late emergecy team arrival, is to blame on multiple factor. 19 minutes really is a great timer. Also, did you actually knew that most of emergency services, are most of the time, greet with some random dude, telling them they are to late and yelling at them. We are trying our fucking best. And we are sorry for the time we are to late, if we had to choose, don't have to think about it twice, we would save everyone. But it's not a matter of choice you see? And most of us handle very badly when people come to die because we wasn't able to save them. It's easy to blame us, because we are the person that should have save your relative.
I will never forget my stepdad pulling his gun in a confrontation. I was 12. I remember watching my stepdad get punched very hard in the face. He never fired a shot. He was barely standing up and was obviously stunned yet he had the awareness to recognize that the situation instantly de-escalated the moment he drew his weapon, exactly like what happened in this video. My stepdad would have said as soon as the dude started to step away, pulling the trigger would be murder and not self defense.
@Magnus Carlsson Nope, I dont have a gun. My point is that people get shot because people get upset in the moment and just shoot. The idea that everyone has guns to protect themselves doesn't really work.
35 likes
Magnus Carlsson2021-08-18 07:10:48 (edited 2021-08-18 07:14:30 )
@Faktor114 I got you. My point was that your example was no good. Also...next time I refer to "you", don't take it personally
@Kyle Castloo bank robbers are the least likely to hurt you intentionally that makes literally no sense plus why shoot someone who’s robbing a business of a product already %100 insured
@Faktor114 "Yet, if the other guy had a gun one (1) if them would likely be dead" ...didn't you notice that one of them died anyway... without having a gun?
@Mark 1 Mod 0 Facts!! I wasn’t really into guns until I married my wife who comes from a family where she grew up shooting and learning how to properly use firearms.. Her father always told me no matter what, you never pull your firearm unless you are intending to kill.. And that should only be the case if you feel if your life, your families life, or an innocent persons life is in danger..
It all depends on the situation which sucks the person assaulting you deserves what they get in my opinion which is why it's called assault the moment someone lays hands on you
@Faktor114 There's no differences between that story and the one on the video. Just another outcome. There's (must be) a reason why ppl doesn't shoot each over when in a standoff in the movies (which I don't understand)
If someone confronts me, you better believe I am gonna have my space or else, if my space gets invaded, they’re going 6 feet under. Let you taxpayers pay for my free food, housing, and medical care. 😂
@Cole Games , using your analogy of a Herpetologist (A trained veterinarian who specializes in reptiles) being one of the few qualified individuals to own a python, at what point do we draw the line in training and experience being nessasary in owning a firearm? While I agree, prior to purchasing a firearm one should have basic training and familiarization with the weapon platform one seeks to acquire, yet how much training is needed?
Additionally, criminals do not care about firearms legislation. If they want one, they will find one, and not submit to a 10 day waiting period. These days, 3D printers are getting good at making ghost guns as well. Then there are the other ghost guns, metal fully functioning 1911, Glock and Smith & Wesson replicas, chambered in. 40 Cal S&W and 45 ACP, made in the Philippines without Manufacturer / ATF&E Serial Numbers. Training, background checks and waiting periods only seek to hinder the responsible firearms owner, it is not a crime preventative, in my opinion.
Was he sucker punched like the guy in the video though? I've been sucker punch in the past and the surprise has a huge effect on how you perceive a situation. It goes from 0 to 9000 in a fraction of second and you don't understand what happened to you, every movement that happens afterward can be seen as an act of aggression. If I had been in this guy shoes I might have shot the dude as well. He was on the ground, shocked and hurt.
@Chris Fernandez He said "that's why you shoot bank robbers. Texas style." Maybe you dont know a lot about legalities, but in texas you can shoot to kill someone that is actively stealing your property.
You're right though, because I was initially thinking about it, and the guy fires one shot after he's already been attacked you know, so I was kind of mulling it over there... Clearly the guy is a pos just for doing this to a woman with three kids in the car, that parts are given but the rest... You're absolutely right.
@Faktor114 i implore you to do some digging about countries outside of america. even if guns aren't available, people will still use what they can to carry out violence. humans by nature are flawed, and that's usually okay and fixable (based on the fact that we are humans and thus are usually able to ignore animalistic instincts or at least know what the consequences of their actions are), but an unfortunate amount of us slip between the cracks. for example, the UK has a huge problem with how they treat their jewish and romani citizens, as well as their migrant workers from eastern europe. in france, an elderly woman was defenestrated by an intruder who got triggered by her jewishness. despite making it glaringly obvious that he was proud to have killed a jew, he he was deemed unfit for trial because he was too high on weed. weed. it took forever for france to openly admit that it was a hate crime. he acted the same way nikolas cruz did - saying he was possessed by a demon - and actually got away with it. in contrast, nikolas cruz is under trial. the investigators knew he was trying to worm his way into making people believe he was insane.
what i'm trying to get at is that yes, america has a gun problem. but i'm tired of europe not being held accountable for their intense rise in anti-jewish hate crimes. even macron was heavily criticized for saying that her killer needs to stand trial.
He violated everything that you learn in getting a CC license... especially the first rule, don't go looking for trouble. He was sentenced to 20 years BTW.
1686 likes
Replies (62)
Mike Tayon2021-08-29 17:29:41 (edited 2021-09-01 21:45:41 )
" He was sentenced to 20 years BTW. " AND someone kicked his as in prison! :)
is there any way to find him and send him mail? id love to send him a couple words ya know? nothing bulgur of course i mean he is already being punished but idk maybe a friendly reminder that now there's children out there with no father who probably think about seeing their dad fall over in front of them.
@Jax Anon I don't think you understand how long 20 years is, go ahead and reply to this comment in 20 years okay then we'll talk about it some more in 20 years.
@Jax Anon I get the equibility of it, but it doesn't concern me. Everyone is born into their own shoes the way I see it, so I don't look down on anybody. I care more about what's practical. It's to contain a threat and provide a deterrent. That's the function of the penal system. Like I said before the guy is not even a threat without a gun. He was attacked first and that is not nothing, even though the vast majority of the blame is clearly overwhelmingly on him.
@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 20 years of imprisonment are not even close to 20 years of ordinary, free life. You feel like every day takes forever. Hour is like day, day is like a week, week is like a month and month is like a year but the single year is like eternity.
The guy was attacked and he defended himself. He should not have killed him or shot his gun.. but thats what a weapon is for and that’s why people carry them around .. the guy attacked him first also.. I’m not saying he’s in the right , but I mean it’s one of those things were as sad as it is the guy was defending himself from 2 people one who had just assaulted him.. it’s either he sit there and not do anything or the latter
Stand your ground law means you can fight with the same force as your attacker. He obviously gave him time to get up and fight but Drewhatever was too scared and used excessive force that was unnecessary. And who goes around looking for handicap stickers. I'm from the same neighborhood and heard the shots.
He wasn’t looking for trouble though. He was being a good citizen, since the person was illegally parked. Then he gets assaulted by the deceased. Definitely not the instigator
@Josh Ström probably not all of them, or even a large percentage of them you know, but possibly could stop a school shooting or two, maybe, if you think that's something worth doing?
@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 didn't say that no shit there isn't perfect solutions but wouldn't it be logical for law abiding citizens to have legally obtained guns to protect against those who have illegally obtained guns just seems like the best reality possible on the topic of guns and gun control
@Josh Ström is that the answer? You see because when you create a situation where everyone has a firearm that's a dangerous situation. You see I know that because I was in the military and I was in situations where every single person had a firearm and there were safety protocols and things that we did to avoid accidents that don't happen in civilian life so I want to know why you think that is a good idea without having something like that in place, or I want you to explain to me why the military didn't need to have those protocols in place.
@Josh Ström see I like guns. Guns are fun. Guns are badass. Guns are nice to have around and I wish we could live in a world where we could have guns around. But at the end of the day, what you have there is a tool that serves a purpose, and is also just a fun little thing to play with, you know, like anything else. Like say a Dremel tool for example. But let's say dremel tools were killing you know, however many people a year, and at some point the people around you decide that the benefit of you having a fun little toy to play with isn't worth the cost of that many human lives. Then in my book either you let that one go, or you decide blow them all off and live your life as a complete asshole. I guess do whatever you're comfortable with of the two.
Thank you so very much! I wanted to finish reading the comments before I started another JCS case and Googled the verdict 😁 Take care everyone, *please*! ❤
@Circassian Assasin well that was my measured position on gub control. I guess it's true what they say, you can't please all the people all the time, especially on the topic of gub control.
Are you people serious!? Listen, I am liberal for the most part. I do think everyone has the right to own a gun tho. But wrong is wrong.
The black guy assaulted the guy first! The white guy was just talking and didn't do anything illegal.
You can say he was annoying or whatever but he didn't assault anyone. It's a free country. First ammendment. Say what you want but when you put your hands on someone and push them that hard to the ground, I no longer view you as the victim but the aggressor.
The black guy only retreated after he saw the gun pointed at him. It didn't matter if he was walking back at that point. The crime of assault was already committed. I am tired of my fellow liberals defending the suspects and victims of police violence no matter what they do. Resisting arrest, punching and cop, driving away, etc.
No one deserves to die for it but obey the law! Don't assault someone. Period. I dont feel bad for the guy who got killed in this situation at all. His girlfriend said, do I need to go get my man. They were the aggressors. The white guy was just annoying and nosy. But they were parked in the handicap parking spot which is also ILLEGAL!!!
@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 Om. You said you can only use force equal to the force being used against you.
That goes both ways. The white was just using his words at first. Then the black guy escalated it by using physical violence.
So the black guy is wrong on every level here plus they parked in a handicap spot. Not good people. She probably got a settlement by suing someone too. I don't feel bad for them. They should have known a lot better.
@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 Yes he is dead bc he broke the law and assaulted another man that was just using his WORDS. THATS ALL. You still don't seem to understand why assaulting someone is wrong.
@Milky Way so you're saying if someone doesn't agree with you that it's ok to murder someone on the spot for assaulting you, then you're saying that they "don't believe assault is wrong". That's pretty interesting. Do you find a lot of people agree with you about this?
@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 Smh. You are not making any sense. Assaulting someone is not "disagreeing". It is a crime that warrants self defense by any means necessary.
The black guy was younger, bigger, stronger and clearly violent. He pushed him hard and then walked over him waiting for him to get up. He deserved it.
@Milky Way what if that was your kid and he got in a disagreement with someone and your kid through the first punch because the other kid was talking back to him any other kid was smaller and he took out a gun and shot him. How does that scenario play out now?
@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 I am neither white or black. There are other races that live in this country that are not white or black. Or even Hispanic for that matter.
I am a dark skinned man from Southeast Asia. I have only voted for liberals all my life. But I call a spade a spade on both sides.
Most people are just like you, very partisan not just politically but culturally, religiously, even with your sports affiliations. Everyone is a fanboy of someone that they defend no matter what they say and do whether it be a musical artist, athlete, politician, cops, celebrity, etc.
I am not like that. I call a spade a spade. Chauvin deserved to go to prison.
@dabomboo7o I wouldn't have done anything to provoke an attack in the first place lol sure it sucks for people to park in a handicapped spot when they don't have a placard but I'm not a cop. It's not my job to bug people about minor infractions 🤷♂️
seems to me like this nut had firearm fascination. Felt it made him a big man who can go around poking people waiting to use his firearm! Almost as if he purchased the weapon with intentions to kill someone?
Had the victim attacked after he shoved the perp down, this wouldn't be on YouTube as it would be justifiable homicide. His life was not in imminent danger. The victim wasn't armed as well.
That defense was fucking trash lmao thank god "He wasn't happy when heard the guy died" he wasn't sad either "Hurr durr the cameras are old don't represent what happened" you can see him get pushed over, the victim back away at the site of the gun, and the shot fire "Uhh the cashier didn't know he had a gun" who cares and how's that relevant? "Cashier described him as calm" just as i'm sure he was when he pulled the trigger and just as he was when he described the event to investigators, with a version full of cap "There was clear reasonable doubt" my guy you can SEE the victim clearly back away "One man is already gone, do you want to take another away" lmaoooooo really?
Everybody knows at least one guy like this: self appointed keeper of justice. The truly believe they are obligated to tell people they are not doing things the right way. Now it bugs me too when able-bodied people park in disabled parking spots. But unless I see a person with a visible disabled sticker (or 'placard' as junior G-man likes to call them) unable to park because an able-bodied person has occupied the spot, I'm not going to say anything. Even then, I'd like to think I'd be polite about it. After all, you never know a person's situation. There are plenty of reasons why they may not have a sticker displayed, or simply why they might need to park there. What I would not do is shoot a guy for defending his wife from some self righteous a$$hole.
This guy exaggerates his hurt arm, puts it up on the table then forgets it's hurt and hides it again, makes a fake sling using his t-shirt, then proceeds to use his arm during the interrogation... Like I can't even right now...
This man should of never fired his gun.. I understand being scared that a man bigger than you pushed you over but he had all control when he took out his fire arm and he definitely didn't have to shoot.
It's sad knowing that if this guy was a police officer that got shoved to the ground there's no way he would have been convicted for murdering an unarmed person.
Lock up and throw away key he took the time to shoot for the lungs he killshot him on purpose when he was backed off and not a treat it wasn't split seconds he had a full 2 seconds and he choose to murder like he was justified to
Love these vids and content. It sucks YT did you guys dirty. Glad you're coming back just please take it easy with the adds! Every 5 mins of this video there were adds. Super annoying
First 2 victims didn’t press chargers, 3rd incident didn’t involve a gun but he was charged with aggressive driving, 4th incident happened at the same convince store with a truck driver parked in the handicap spot, he even rang the truck company saying he was going to blow his head off but no one reported it to police until after they saw the death of Markeis
@LostStarzOfTheSky as I'm from Tampa, I do think we need less relaxed laws, I want the freedom of protection, something thats a human right (the constitution made it not for that reason tho), but yeah after Drejka I think gun law needs to have psychiatry tests before issuing a gun.
The way this is narrated, "Four prior road incidents where he threatened drivers with a gun, two were male, two were (emphasis in voice) FEMALE..." - is it worse to threaten females than males?
@Greg Robinette It does sound like the prosecutor & jury got it wrong with George Zimmerman, he should have been convicted for something, because he did so many things wrong leading up to that and in the end, he shot a guy who did have business there and wasn't carrying anything more nefarious in his pocket than Skittles. Somebody like Zimmerman makes the other gun owners look bad.
@Allan La Fontaine yeah and i'd bet they didn't press charges out of fear of retaliation, had a situation like that before. In the process of pressing charges the accused has access to your home address and if that person will pull a gun in traffic who knows what could happen.
@Allan La Fontaine exactly. let this be a lesson. if one of those people hadn't taken the "no harm no foul" mentality and actually pressed charges, there's a good chance this would have never happened.
@G you guys are not only ones who have lots of guns. In Europe there are pretty heavily armed counters yet we don't have problems like that. In whole history there are less school shootings in Europe then in US in a year, even if we count Russia. There is something wrong with your country that's it. That's great that you can own gun if its make you safe, but if all you need to kill someone and have no consequences is to say that you felt threatened... That's absurd, no wonder that you don't feel safe.
@Why We Love Film If he were black he would still have his guns and not be in prison. The first two people didn’t press charges. The third incident there was no gun. And the fourth was never reported. This white guy was definitely guilty of manslaughter. BUT THERE IS NO RACISM INVOLVED IN THIS CASE. Definitely not the outcome right?
He never said it didn't have truth, its literally just a phrase to begin his explanation of it for people who don't know about it. He even described under what conditions you would be able to justify your actions based on said rule.
Specifically in a case like this where one of the main arguments from Mr. Shooty is that the guy was walking towards him. Even SD video can show a footstep clear enough.
33 likes
John Doe2020-04-21 19:06:31 (edited 2020-04-21 19:06:40 )
@Joseph Stauter Hell, the display on a TI-88 calculator could show that much.
I'm assuming his attorney is a court-appointed public defender (just started watching), but I hope he's not, honestly. Anybody having to deal with this guy and represent him in court deserves better pay than public defenders. yes I know it's awful that somebody even has to try to defend people like this, but it's the law and the foundation of our court system. The attorneys know there's no chance of winning, but somebody has to take the case. Usually an attorney in need of work/public defender.
if pixels have anything to do with not being able to see certain things in the footage, then it is an argument. Can't be your main one, but it can be used.
Or when you're arguing his reaction in the interview when he found out the guy he shot is dead. He didn't celebrate because he's not stupid. He's in front of two cops. He celebrates, that's an admission of guilt.
could be a valid excuse if there are a lot of artifacts present in the footage. could show something that clearly isn't happening on screen. definitely not the case for this footage though, but it could be valid for others.
@Kaas Perzik Agreed, but what people need to understand in this particular case is that the attorney is simply trying to create doubt, any doubt, especially when the client wants to take it to trial but there's not much to use for the defense. If he can cast doubt in just one juror's mind, that's all he needs to win the case. A defense attorney will advise a client with a bad case to settle or take a plea deal, but when the client refuses, they gotta do their job. Some clients just don't know what's good for them when they've already fucked everything up.
@John Doe wasn't this guy represented by those NRA carry guard lawyers? Basically lawyers paid to defend people that shoot people in 'apparent' self defense.
If he hadn’t had the gun he may or may not have approached the lady about being in the handicap spot but for sure that man would not have gotten shot and killed. It is mr drejkas fault for pulling the trigger, but who gave him the trigger to pull? Also yeah he was probably the type of guy that went to target practice every day. That close to the target he could have shot him anywhere to “neutralize the threat” , but he hit the guy in a spot that would kill him. And if I just found out somebody I injures accidentally had died because of me I would have been in tears. Michael didn’t even seem to care.
hahaha same, i went around listening to this, to Chris Hansen ''to catch a predator'' etc. I love the psychological aspect and how these subject weave their lies. If a FBI agent look at my youtube list, ill be thrown in jail
@Dominic Lacroix I think most of us who follow these types of channels would be in the same boat. They can't come for us all, can they? Hey! At least if they get some of us, there will be new material for the others to watch!
Well, I'm a fed and I'm STILL intrigued. Always have been. I watch to appreciate/criticize certain aspects. This cornflake using all those cop terms made me itch. Just a grown nerd
ThatOneIntrovert probably cia before fbi I don’t think nsa does jack shit anymore than they have to. But idk I could be wrong, I was wrong once before. Well actually I wasn’t wrong, no see, it turns out I was just mistaken.
David Kinsella none of us have worry with that, we are just checking our facts as we go because we understand mid to middle intermediate English language, and that’s all ya gotta know!! Rack up a word for everything and then round up 2-3 synonyms and antonyms for each word a couple times memorize as much as possible and then the only fool for a lawyer is... well not me, I’m not a lawyer regardless of what I understand. I don’t know the law because it’s not readily available here for anyone (contestants batter up, east TN here) otherwise without snitches and innocent/guilty imbeciles they would make no further arrests. Ever: let’s find the key to this message; Miranda Rights means Miranda’s case was a case where he didn’t/couldn’t shut the fuck up, until he realized that he was actually in real time becoming a genius (he had no knowledge I’m sure, just a badass lawyer after the shit show he made) 😂
Me neither, me neither ha ha ha haaaaaa ha ha haaaaaa Hahaha HAAAAAAA HAW HAW HAW CAW CAW CAAAAAAAW!?!!??! wait I didn't mean to write the maniacal laughing out loud, damn it too late now, cats out the bag I guess.
@Omar Exactly. They even up on catchin u spelling shyt out. If u on the 📱 or email, don’t think just cuz u spelled out bizzzyizzzyomb instead of just sayin it, that erthing sweet. I know all the bangers and boosters WISH they had a time machine to beam their azzes back to when there were no CCTVs damn near in on er block, country full of semi-pro phone cameramen and computer, financial and med forensics. I idk y peep even bother anymore. 🤷🏻♀️ 😜
Saw it on the last one of these videos I watch. Maybe you copied it, or maybe someone else copied from you. Either was, please make your own jokes, people. I don’t like the culture of comment stealing.
Omg I've been thinking the same thing. Watching crime documentaries one after the other, googling shit I don't understand. They'll probably investigate tf out of me and I'll probably say stupid things and go to jail for just watching these. 😭😂
@Amanda Kuhlman In a truly free country nobody would ever be afraid that the security state have a file on them for simply watching true crime content. It's kind of sad how normal it has become to accept that level of paranoia.
Same. FBI guy if your seeing this, this guys videos are just really interesting and im trying to watch long stuff to stay up cus i messed up my sleep schedule. LOL
There's nothing wrong with us having a deep interest or fascination in the psychology of a "fill in the blank," criminal mind. I've seen multiple cases and I find the interrogation very interesting. Part of me wants to get into law enforcement and another part me makes me realize I cannot handle this type of work. The victims stories are absolutely devastating to me and I get to a point as a viewer that I cannot watch too many of these videos as it takes a toll on my well being. So with that being said, I have the utmost respect for the officers who take these cases in pressing for justice.
In the cases of paedophiles or other sex offenders walking that fine line of sociopath/psychopath, I wish there were an alternative to life without parole or death penalty.. I was thinking more along the lines of amputation.. Like removing their hands and feet.. Arms or legs so they can NEVER even think about committing any crime again as they physically cannot.. This would declog the justice system significantly..
Of course this guy shouldn't get that extreme.. But I'm referring to the more hanus acts on humankind. I can think of two cases where removing the limbs of these criminals would suffice.. 1) Nikko (forgot last name) and any child sex offender.. Yea.. Chop them hands off plz!!
No mention of the fact that it wasn't his job to be the Parking Space Badge Wearer and intimidate the car users, whether they were supposed to be parked there or not.....
@Dominic Lacroix hahaha same, i find the psychology behind it very interesting, I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who's thought about what would whoever sees my youtube history think about these videos lol!
I tried telling my mom about the “fbi worker” watching each persons phone joke and she thought I was insane. I can’t stand millennial humour it’s like their brains don’t understand anything LOL
my dad had loads of books about real life murders and we used to joke if my mum went missing, the police would see those books and start lifting the floorboards.
Then Fred West got charged with murdering about 20 women and their bodies were found in chimneys and walls and under the floorboards, he got rid of every single book.
Tony mante2021-05-30 21:16:02 (edited 2021-05-30 21:16:49 )
if i ever get investigated watrching these will serve the exact opposite lmfao detective hands me water bottle me this is clearly a reverse psychololgy ploy to befreind me and gain my trust refuse the water officer your just here to describe the fence that you saw a driver run into son your not here as a suspect you signed a witness waiver me' clearly im a prime suspect in this case now.
He shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
@Michael Zomsuv dude had sevral times he pulled a gun and threatened people with a gun...he was playing cop....and got his ass checked....he shouldve called the cops on them parking in a handicap space. He wanted to be a cop so bad that he was playing a cop in rl
@Nick During Obama era, there was a huge controversy about fbi and government spying on american citizens. Obama was backing up the fbi to use social media data and phone conversations basically violating basic human rights. The joke is that we all have an fbi guy spying on us.
@Michael Zomsuv it's been that way since Bush dumbbell. The "Patriot Act" was the ultimate spy bill. Has nothing to do with Obama or Bush or whoever. They all want more power over us. Wake TF up
@Michael Zomsuv keep in mind he shoved hin because he was being aggresive towards his wife and child....he was tough then...and when confronted by a man was scared to death...anyone being aggresive towards my wife and child would probaly get more than a shove.dud e was walking away when he got shot...mike had NO business with a gun...he felt powerful with a gun and approaching people that was proven in court...theres a reason he will live in prison untill hes a old man.
@gray in fact, when you look in to the defenition of a incel im quite the opposite, and neither am i salty or sad. My life is going great and i got a loving bf.
Lukas, being not that important is the problem. The system is set up to protect the “important” at the expenses of the “not important”, which is the vast majority of the population
everytime im watching one of these videos i genuinely get that feeling im not even kidding lmfao i watched a lot of murder cases lately cause it interests me and im interested to know what goes on in these peoples minds (even though its very hard to tell) and every time i watch one i have that thought lmfao
Tbh I’ve been thinking of doing petty crime just so I can see how I’d fare during interrogation. Not sure who’d interrogate someone over petty crime, but fuck it: If nothing else, I’ll have a decent supply of candy bars.
The black guy took a running start and pushed him hard from behind, gave him whiplash and then was looking at him like, what's up!??? Pulled up his shorts again and was ready to fight, waiting for him to get up so he can punch him.
So to say that guy was the victim is ridiculous. I am a liberal but I am so tired of people on both sides not being objective and honest.
He literally has training that made him think homicide was the proper action... like the worse advertisement for gun rights ever... and he laughs about using a gun as a "force multiplier"... yikes
Im very happy to see this. I lived in st Pete when this happened and remembered them releasing him and me think that was the end of it. I'm glad he got found guilty. Im going to check his sentence now.
Fake tough guys who are weak and insecure about it, so they get into hacky pseudo-military lingo to try to sound tough and decisive, when in reality, as in Michael's case, he's just a ball-less coward with a peashooter.
@Adam Stiff, dont forget that America has a lot of real supersoldiers too. Think Delta Force, Seal Team 6, Pararescuers, etc. Also dont forget that America has the most powerful military in the world. Kinda hard to have all that with just a bunch of wanna-be super soldiers and none of the real deal. With all the countries that hate America, amazing how none of them have bothered to try to take America on in a war. The whole world knows that would be suicide for anyone.
@Junny Conner I’ve seen people of all creeds talk like this so don’t be racist. It’s an unhealthy gun enthusiast trying and failing to get on the level of law enforcement.
@bernier alexandre don't bring cops into this please u don't fight discrimination and hate with more discrimination and hate in my area there was a shooting were 2 cops were killed 2 years ago we still have flags that say Gilchrist remember to honor those cops who gave their lives but I've seen please who praise the shooter for killing the cops yet my town trenton has only ever had 3 murders in its 150 year old history which were the 2 cops and the shooter he was kill by back up police in a gun fight it pains me to see people disrespect police
As an actual Soldier, I was cringing throughout the video whenever he said "Roger", "Affirmative", etc. That's some straight up cultural appropriation.
@General Leigh you sound like you would buy one if those "Too old to fight, too fat to run, so brother when I fight it ain't gonna be fair yeehaw giddyup" type shirts from a truck stop. Being old and scared isn't an excuse to shoot someone at the first sign of a confrontation
@Alex Winters name exactly what privilege this man has? Like is it privileged of getting a job just for his skin color? Or privilege of playing victim? So what is it? White privilege he would never have been arrested or found guilty!
A wanna be; thats who. You can hear it in the way he talks. The way he says he goes to that station every day and checked the car for handicap plates as if he has some right to dictate who parks where. On top of the fact he parks illegally to confront them
@Farhan Chowdhury overweight doesn't mean fat. There's a lot of people who are over weight by a little bit. Or perhaps all the extra weight is muscle, or whatever. And these studies aren't always 100% accurate. Ther is a margin of error. The people in the U.S army, Navy and Airforce would have to be well trained and adept even if they were to be overweight by a little bit. Regardless, I still think that over half of America's people can hike that far. Or do even better.
@Galacticz Randomizer if you don't know any physical activity consistently like lifting heavy objects consistently, you don't have above average muscle mass.
I'm reffering to the general.Americwn public. And most veterans let them selves go mainly because many of them have service connected injuries and.chronic pain to contiuenly being active.
Wannabe tough guy militia/military/law enforcement types. IMHO, he's trying to impress the cops with how "professional" he is, and place himself on the same level as them in their eyes. I have a friend who's a police dispatcher, and they've said that these type of guys are a dime a dozen. They spew pseudo-military/law enforcement lingo, (usually incorrectly) but they're almost always just wannabe weekend warrior poseurs.
@Dan C This! I was an EMT, and most of the folks I did my medic training with were law enforcement, firefighters and/or former military. Out of all of them, only one guy (who had briefly served in the reserves) consistently talked like this. All the other actual military and LE people called him "Soldier of Fortune" or "Weekend Warrior" behind his back, and considered him a chickenshit poser.
@Roddy Piper's Irritated Corneas now you just making things up, hes trying to use language that he things will help his connect and gain the trust of the people above him, nothing more nothing less
@Simply_Based you must make a conscious and moral decision every day to dedicate, equip and prepare yourself to thrive in that toxic, corrosive moment when the illegal handicap parker comes knocking at the door
@Farhan Chowdhury in fairnes I’m outta shape and 290 and was in the front of my hiking buddies for a 22 mile trail. That being said i was FEELIN that hike
@Aaron Smith I mean, there was the whole Iraq War in recent years, but most of that was miscommunication and lying about the area. Point is a group tried to fight America knowing the risks and lost. After all, the US was literally made after a bunch of farmers fought the world’s strongest military.
Loki D. Wolf2021-05-29 06:13:41 (edited 2021-05-29 06:15:04 )
@Adam Stiff It's the race that makes a person like this hyped up though. So, it could actually be about race since Black men are looked apon so negatively in general. Trayvon Martin, for example, wasn't a threat. It was the stereotype of being Black that got him killed though.
People who buy guns are itching for the opportunity to use them. I talk with many people who support gun laws and that is the general consensus that I get from them. If they get the opportunity, they will use it. The concerning thing is what qualifies as an opportunity in your eyes vs. The eyes of the law
My thoughts were that when he said that, he was trying to say that when he was pushed, we was pushed that far away from him. Not that he was that far away that he wasn’t a threat.
Every lawyer watching this is pulling the hair out of their head.
1 like
CARLO CALÙCCO2022-03-30 04:16:41 (edited 2022-03-30 04:37:05 )
I think he shot the other guy because he's image was damaged in he's hood at he's store. Like he said he come's there every day. He was embarrassed because of getting pushed over i think. Some people shouldnt be allowed to carry guns !
"Paramedics arrived within 19 minutes..." Jeez. The national average, I think, is around 7 minutes. There's lots of reasons that can cause a delay, but regardless this definitely compels me to learn basic first aid and CPR, at least.
Chris Millsap2019-10-09 11:25:34 (edited 2019-10-09 19:00:54 )
The scene was not safe so they had to stage. That's like the first thing you learn in EMT school (BSI, is my scene safe?) - an actual EMT/Firefighter with a sweet stache
Yeah, actually the Tampa Bay area had one the fastest response times in the US, if not the fastest. I don't know if they still do or not. But I'm guessing it's because of all the old retirees that live there. At least, that's what i heard, I've never actually looked it up though
dang, what does that say about where I live that I thought 19 minutes sounded really quick... Ambulance took 40 mins to an hour to show up at my location when a friend collapsed and started having a seizure.
The best you can do is clear the airways, keep pressure on the wound, maintain chest compressions, and DON'T MOVE THE PATIENT! Any or all of those when applicable is the most an untrained person without supplies and skills with those supplies can really do. But that could be enough.
"Classic" CPR with the whole breathe in then push 10 times then breathe again is outdated and not really utilized anymore. Continuous chest compressions.
Edit: AND LEAVE THE PUNCTURE OBJECT (knife, spike, arrow, rebar, etc) IN!
definition of spineless. if you instigate a conflict, be prepared to be retaliated against. it isn’t the other party’s fault if they match your energy. micheal did something, and the husband did something back, at which point they are effectively “even”. there was no reason for the conflict to then be elevated, this man was simply waiting for the opportunity to take “justice”into his own hands.
Hmm, not really. There was no evenness at any point. You don't try to pick a fight over something that doesn't affect you, you don't push someone to the ground over an arguement, you don't shoot at someone that just pushed you to the ground. Unnecessary escalation in every step.
@Zarco no i agree, i’m just saying in this situation, even at its most basic level without context, it still makes no sense for him to shoot. but yes everything was wrong from the beginning
I read online that this guy is not new to this kind of aggressive behaviour. This man is his first murder victim, but apparently the guy has a short fuse.
No joke, I had a coworker like that, he was a gun fanatic that although he had never been in the army was acting as if he were on "active duty" or something. While walking with him to the station after work a guy tried to open my back pack, I confronted the would be thief about it while my coworker was cowering behind me. I am a 124 pounds 5'3 nothing of a woman. My coworker was 5'8 and around 300 or so pounds. I yelled at the would be thief and lucky for me the street had enough ppl that took notice and so he ran. Afterwards my coworker was saying" The thief was smart to run away. I learned CQC in the army and would have beaten him up!" Thankfully my coworker was just a veeerrryyy cringe guy. Still, I am happy that guns are regulated where I live and insecure idiots can't take out their insecurities on innocent ppl just because.
@Mo I haven’t watched the whole video yet so I haven’t heard him say anything racist but how is he racist? Is the very act of someone who’s white killing someone that’s black automatically make the motive one of race?
so People like Mr. Drejka can get away pretending beeing innocent??! I tell you what i realize the more i think about what i've just watched for 50 Minutes and reading comments like yours: It's incredibly important not shoot at other people. Sadly there's one dead man and at least one family in tears and despair.
@SuperBalders Dude relax, I never said he was innocent. He is guilty but what you missed was that it's NEVER good talking to LEOs without representation.
@SuperBalders U can clearly tell That wasn’t the Intent of his message he was saying how the tactics they use to try and convict u are never In your favor wether ur innocent or guilty
@Dylan Druckman superbalders should image himself in a situation where some guys comes at him with a knife saying he will kill him but dies after being showed back and falling very unfortunately. See if then its good or bad to have a lawyer
@SuperBalders "it's incredibly important not shoot at other people" is oversimplifying it. Drejka's true motivation will only be known to himself. You have to give the benefit of the doubt when scrutinizing incidents shown in videos in slow motion or frame by frame. Confrontations happen fast and you'll be flooded with adrenaline. You really need to have a level head to make the right decisions in the heat of the moment. Even "trained" LEO themselves instinctively react wrongly and kill people. Having said this, I do think Drejka is a arrogant self righteous person based on the way he speaks, this incident and the 4 accounts of road rage.
D_Mat's point was that LEO will try to catch you from the first interaction and if they suspect you at all, you better get a lawyer. Notice, it had nothing to do with your guilt.
4 likes
rat bastian2021-06-03 08:21:28 (edited 2021-06-03 08:22:32 )
@SuperBalders But the point isn't whether or not the person sitting in the interrogation room is innocent or guilty, it matters that everyone has the right to legal representation, even arrogant assholes like this dude. More often, innocent people think they can just explain what happened and the police will let them go. Instead, they're often tricked into revealing information that can be used against them unfairly in court or into giving false confessions because they believe they're alone in there and if they do what the cops say, things will be easier. Every law video I've watched about the subject says don't talk to cops, get an attorney first no matter what. And that also doesn't mean that we excuse what he did or think he's a good person, ONLY that he has the same rights as everyone else
@D_ Mat think i got your comment wrong in the first moment, sorry for that. i thought you've been only talking about this particular video and not several other JCS videos or related stuff.
@Alkuf100 Not saying anything against the need for justice and the need for a fair legal representation at all. You're twisting the situation shown in this video, Mr. McGlockton died without having a knife or saying anything at all. No Lawyer in the world could have helped him as you know, because the guy he shoved away shot him dead. Where does this lead to? Society is in a bad state when everyone needs to expect violent escalation to the extreme before leaving the house. Does arming yourself make it better for others, or at least more safe for everyone?
@SuperBalders Arming yourself, assuming you're not an idiot like Michael, absolutely makes it safer for everyone else. While I agree he was in the wrong, to play devil's advocate you could never know if the attacker had a knife stashed somewhere. Shit, for all the dude could have known the McGlockton could have been retreating to take cover and draw a gun of his own. The sheer amount of panic is enough to make anyone able to make stupid decisions. I don't agree with what happened, but given the circumstance I could see why someone in his position could possibly do such a thing.
That being said, the way he conducted himself as well as previous traffic incidents clearly shows that Michael ultimately was the one in the wrong here.
@Jaze yeah, i think i got D-Mat's intention now :) . To the quote you're refering to: as the Prosecutor well explained, the problem is not drawing the gun when you feel in danger, but still firing it when you realized that your opponent freezes or turns away from you. And that's what Mr. Drejka did. Sure, Adrenaline is an important factor in such situations, though this situation is different. Drejka approached the car, realized at least then Mrs. Jacobs is waiting inside the car for someone, consequence is, that person will return sooner or later. I expect Drejka to have calculated all what might happen. So i don't think i am oversimplifying it, Drejka would still be free, McGockton would be alive - because this was no act of self defense like when he would be attacked out of nowhere. No. Drejka went into confrontations over and over again with the ill feeling of personal safety because he had a sidearm under his clothes.
@August McFarren okay, let's continue: Not only Person A (in this Situation Drejka) and B (McGlockton) who are the people in Center of the conflict are armed, but also C (why shouldn't the mother in the car be armed to protect her children aswell?) and of course Person D (The owner of the Shop has to protect his store!) and Person E (walking a Dog in daylight can get you into trouble!) and most the others around the shop all carry a gun. Remember it's around 3pm, there might be lots of customers. They are mostly strangers, only a few are somehow known to each other. F.e. Person D knows his regular customers, characterized Person A as calm guy who comes around quite often. Shit hits the fan if the first gun is drawn, would these people agree to calm down our would it end up in a even worse catastrophe? Yes, i am exaggerating of course... But how do you know i'm not an "Idiot" like Drejka, the moment i grab my gun? How many people around you would make a mistake, or lose nerves? Back to the Picture: Imagine Person C who is worried about her children behind her and comes to conclusion that "neutralizing" Person A ist the best way to protect her kids or even her boyfriend, so she takes initiative. Would the suggested Person E, who arrived a moment later at the scene identify her in a defensive position or identify her as the aggressor? From my point of view, the more weapons (if gun, knife or whatever) in the situation, the harder to deescalate it is.
If weapons are in game, it's possibly someone makes use of them. the result in this case is obvious, we all know the story. and don't get me wrong, August, i can follow your arguments. Though, i would respond to your devils Advocate, the person you call attacker is defending his girlfriend from a stranger, if he had any kind of weapon other than his hands, he would have pointed it at Drejka and told him to leave the situation right now instead of attacking / injuring / killing a guy in front of his girl and her kid with a knife or a gun. Adding that Drejka just seemed to be unarmed himself before shit went wild.
Any legitimate firearms instructor that teaches carry classes always makes sure every student is aware that you should never put yourself in a situation that you need to use a firearm. They also teach that just making an aggressor aware that you possess a firearm is almost always effective enough to help you retreat to safety. I honestly believe this man wanted an excuse to take someone’s life and justify it.
@Stephanie coomey it's more dependent on context than that. You need to fear for your life and a serious assault is more than capable of doing that. It also depends on who provoked it and who initiated violence. If a van pulls up to a young woman and the doors open and a guy in a balaclava jumps out pulling her attempting to bring her into the van, but she manages to struggle and pull out a handg*n and shoot her assaulter, then hell yes it's a good thing she can shoot someone who assaults her.
I'm not certain he was "looking for an excuse to take a life" since it's possible he was using the gun to give him the security and confidence to confront people about anything that bothered him and feel powerful doing so. He may have fantasized about using that gun in what he saw as a justified way: like thinking he can confront someone, even be a real prick about it, but if someone escalates that to violence against him he'd happily pull out his g*n and use it if that person so much as takes another step towards him (or as this case plays out, takes 3 steps back and quarter turns away).
As my dad would say "If you wouldn't go there without a gun, why would you go there with one?" Basically meaning exactly what you said. I hope that's something they teach.
I feel so sad for that family. The punishment is even sadder considering he feels no remorse, "wouldn't change a thing" and doesn't understand what he did was wrong. He didn't even blink when they told him he ended someone's life. He only ever shed a tear for his stupid fuckin dogs.
At 36 min and 0 seconds: The Police finally say the guy he shot died, hahaha. He didn’t notice he was being led on all the way until the very end! Funny Police tricks!!
Brian Woodruff “they’ll never suspect me, look they brought me water and everything! we’re friends!” idiots forget how the law works when they think they’re getting what they want
@Ari C I had no idea, I always understood that a public defender took a small nominal fee, and then their services are free. In the UK we have a legal aid system, if you cannot afford a lawyer, you can get one for free, granted, they are mostly useless and don't always have the best interest of their clients at heart.
@Ari C It seems so strange to me, that during the US presidential campaigns, the word "socialist" is thrown out as an insult, almost like you were calling someone a fascist. I am from Scotland, it is a socialist country, we have free primary, secondary and university education, free legal representation and i feel most importantly, free universal healthcare. It is terrible what your friend is going through, as an outsider it seems to me the values that the USA claim to be what makes America unique, never seem to be just. In the land of the free, nothing seems to be free.
This channel has further inforced the need that I have to repeatedly tell my teenage to NEVER SPEAK TO THE COPS. Without me or his dad and an attorney. Ever. Even if he didn't do anything.
@loddydobbs while this is more of a comedic way to look at it i think it has to do with the suspects having that special snowflake feel about themselves, in their heads they're the main character in a story and everyone else is an npc so "there's no way that can happen to me" is in full active mode before well it isn't
@Stuart Sibbald Scotland isn’t a socialist country. You have social welfare that doesn’t mean you’re socialist. Same in Ireland, “free” education, “free” healthcare, “free” legal aid (none of which is actually free by the way) and generous social welfare for those who refuse to work. You don’t know what socialism actually is.
@Stuart Sibbald social programs don’t equal socialism. We still have private ownership and the government doesn’t control the means of production. I can’t believe you think you live in a socialist country when the UK is thoroughly capitalist.
@Stuart Sibbald You don't live in a socialist country. At most, it is a Social Democracy. but it IS Socialist in the colloquial way that Americans use it, when the government collect taxes and pays for stuff beyond roads, military, and police.
Social democracy is great. Socialism can be great to, but it means when the workers own the means of production. It gets rid of Owners being kings of their little fiefdoms, and brings democracy to the work place. decisions are made by popular demand. The wealth generated by that business gets divided up a little more fairly.
I don't know how it is determined who gets more or less money in that system. And I think that system is only really good to use with medium or large companies, so that workers get paid very well, and the CEOs don't get paid tens of millions for providing no where NEAR that level of value, despite what dim witted conservatives will tell you.
White man wishing he was a cop while saying he owns a store he does not own scared a innocent woman and kids over a parking space... Then kills her husband trying to protect them... Racist in the comments: shoulda had a lawyer.
@Stuart Sibbald As an American living abroad, that IS the problem with America. Many Americans throw words like socialist out there, with no understanding as to what it means.
They both used inappropriate force during the altercation. Marquis didn't "need" to shove on the ground a guy arguing with his girlfriend without even a warning. And Michael didn't "need" to shoot at a guy who is retreating in front of him.
But one of the act ended up with a sore arm and a bruise. The other with a dead guy in a middle of a store, in front of his son.
I honestly don't think it was a racial crime, but I think it was a cowardly guy, feeling empowered because he was carrying a gun, and was trying to feel more important than he was.
As an European, the "disabled parking spot" is way more important than for an America. Here, we have a lot less parking spaces, so the disabled ones are really important, and people parking on them are really badly seen. but in America ? There's ton of parking spaces. Even on the video, there's 3 empty spots just in front of the store where a disabled person could have parked when Michael started his crusade.
So yeah, Michael probably didn't want to kill anybody, but he certainly wasn't in any danger as soon as he pulled the gun. As the prosecutor said, as soon as he pulled the gun, it was over, and the shot only happened after that.
I still really struggle with this one. The father was the first one to get physical, making him the assailant. Of course the shooter's a loon, but idk about this verdict.
@zelenyy You can't just run up and physically assault someone tho. In what world is that the solution? For a grown man in front of his children? He attacked him first and took it there. Such a poor decision on his part which triggered the shooter's poor decision. Smh. Play stupid games...
@peps It was stupid of him to push him - but to get killed for it? Drejka was justified in pulling out the gun, but only to use as a threat - not a weapon.
The shooter was harassing the mother of his children with the children in the car still with her and the shooter could have minded his own business or tell a store clerk.
@Porky verbal harassment doesn't mean you can escalate things to physical violence. The father wasn't even involved. He could have minded his own business. Just like you said, their kids were there. What a disgusting example to set for them. Be the bigger person. Use your words to problem solve like a big boy instead of pushing on the playground. That's the adult perspective!
But not the guy that actually defended him. When he said that the parking lot commando was the "Real Victim" that got NO favor with the jury. That one lady was like WTF?!?!
@scumshine There are endless videos of black women ramping up and agitating their overly emotional "men" into furious/violent action. I imagine that it's what we saw here...
@Max Schneiter Depending on where you're from, you may have a different standard of dangerously violent. Seeing a guy knocked to the ground may be shocking to some people, other people might see that he didn't hit him when he was down. The victim was threatening but not life-threatening. I think the killer was motivated by his desire for revenge, not fear.
Lawyers defend the innocent and the innocent are smart enough to get lawers. This guy shot a retreating man so he clearly is not intelligent. Wouldve been self defense if the guy wouldve kept at him but still why didnt he just get back and hit him back? It was a shooting of anger any normal person wouldve either fist fought or stopped after pointing the gun.
@Ellipsis of Triple Tap if he hadn't approached the vehicle, called the cops or reported them to authorities (like he should have if he actually thought they were doing something wrong), and minded his business, this wouldn't have happened. this has nothing to do with your pre-existing biases.
@scumshine People have literally died from being shoved to concrete as well as have been stomped and kicked causing great bodily harm so, yeah, that shove could definitely be grounds for deadly force...
@Alienated TV striking or pushing someone from a blind angle is both cowardly and dangerous. Plenty of people have died or become seriously injured by hitting their heads on asphalt or concrete.
@Ellipsis of Triple Tap You're very clearly racist and I hope you change. I don't have an opinion on this case but you're scaring me. Don't hurt people please and try to be less racist. Ik you probably won't listen to a random person on the internet, but your life will be a lot better through loving others.
Right! The whole time I was like this guy needs to STOP TALKING LIKE NOW! Geez.....he was wrong on so many levels. He picked a fight and got made when he got pushed down in the schoolyard. What was up with that sling that he made? Ridiculous, Im glad he got time.
This guy carried a weapon with the wrong mindset. He was quick to be in an altercation which caused a man to come to his wife’s defense. He caused the event and responded in error with deadly force. He should have minded his own business. Right or wrong, he should have lawyered up.
@Max Schneiter People have pointed out that he didn't step towards the shooter. But he didn't run either. Not sure how I feel about the shooter (even with time to think about it), but if I'm unarmed and I pushed a guy and he pulled a gun I'm sure I know what I'd do. Run to the other dudes car for cover. If he shot him in the back 2.5 seconds after showing his weapon the hang him. But 2.5 seconds is a long time to not run away.
@Jokul Snow the thing is, his wife and kids were still there, so running is not an easy choice. I know I would have been torn between running and protecting my family. I've been in a situation where I had to stand between my wife and a very angry(for no reason) cop, the instinct to protect is a strong thing.
Sadly yes, everyone thinks they can talk their way out of a security camera. The only thing that could possibly happen from the whole interrogation is him screwing himself over.
Ellipsis of Triple Tap So basically, being pushed down is equivalent to being shot and killed? He easily could’ve gone for the legs and/or REASSESSED to confirm whether the “attacker” would continue to escalate the situation prior to ending his life. “Logic”, nowadays...
Brooke Lovett but that is the golden rule. Any decent human being knows that. I think the murder goes way past the point you are identifying. The lawyer part always comes much later, after the crime has been committed. JMO, of course.
Jokul Snow not true, if you run in you in the open like that you risk getting shot on the back , plus he was judging to see if he would shot his wife are the kids in the car, he was still trying to protect. Did you know a mother put her body over her 6 month child when cops was shooting in the car and save her baby life. She did no crime she was a bysider. Yes, some people will only think of themself but there are people out there that think about others. A person did me like that when a gun was pull out, not everybody will run if they think you are the crazy one and trying to save a life. He was defending her and it show to the very end that was on his mind.
@Max Schneiter "Dangerously violent"? He was coming to the defense of his wife because another man was in close proximity and agitating her. 'Course he shouldn't have put his hands on another person legally not that anyone could've blamed him for it. Everyone was in the wrong. And it began with Drejka roleplaying a cop to mask his massive insecurities and physical weakness.
@Sentinel Liberty Protecting her from what exactly? Some guy telling her to move her car? Maybe he was less than polite, but that isn't an excuse to blindside someone.
no name well he don’t own that parking spot so he should of minded his damn business.Dont let some white man tell you what you can and cannot do.Stand for something
@AndroidDoctorr ....no no respect your handcapped...dont put color politics... drejka definitely hit hard enough to be not thinking total clear..and the guy still there ..the girlfriend""?? who could have fixed was as i said before..getting out to do some more smartmouth it appears... and 50-50 for sure self defense in fear of life.. ''remember dont doctor here''hah...''fear'' of'' life'' ... and if the black guy who hit him nfl hard could have killed anyway... u missing...and just bc he was bitching correctly...he had not done anything besides that and was ''away''from her car..enough...further than i have seen a lot of ppl do...so that was fair enough... so if the hard hit had killed the guy drejka... drejka deserves doubt... cant tell if he was '''out in head'' or not...now u believe me... im older white [called white] and i been in shock fear from getting hit...and i more believe the ''big bullies'' of any kind deserve it when the do that on purpose... u should too... had to answer a few of these for that reason.. 30yrs of mouth and lip...in many places...needs to come under control...and physical hard hitting...bc u think u gonna get away with it...needs to stop... i wish a better way... and wish it was a wounded shot...but... if anything ...whites talking here need to ''wake'' .... if anything...that was definitely a ''racial hate crime'' by marquis...and...girlfriend...she cranked it up... if we do call police as should and report...plz dont call the police bullies?? quit being such a trained oneway... i have seen black and others not hire lawyer...get a public defender like in good old nyc or chicago...and get away with something like that 2-3- times in my life when it was black shoot white...and one shoot a teen...and call it ''threats and racial hate name calling'' and get away with it...dismissed... totally no real proof always... and drejka maybe ddnt mean to shoot where he did...would have to determine that also... any case,, lighter sentence due to circumstance...
@videocadet 6 months late, but you do NOT shoot for the limbs. Your chances of missing (which are already high for people who don't train all the time) increase significantly and people can still die very rapidly from limb shots if it hits the right place. If you pull the trigger, it is ONLY because your, or someone else's, life is in imminent danger, period. As the prosecutor said, he was fully justified in pulling his gun, but he definitely should not have pulled the trigger as he was no longer in danger of life or serious injury as the guy was definitely no longer advancing.
It didn't matter though. He was a political example. He was fucked no matter what. The video is proof of his innocence yet everyone in this here comment section thinks otherwise because why did he shoot the guy violently assaulting him... he backed up... yea nothing stopping that guy from charging him and killing him if he put the gun down. Sorry they could have avoided the entire thing by not assaulting him and or not arguing in the first place.
@DeludoSuiHe would be innocent if he fired immediately. Instead he wait for the guy to no only back away but actually turning his body to leave. At this point you can't argue, "I feared for my life" anymore. Not to mention he started the entire altercation because in his mind he thinks that's his store.
No Fux I’m not into simple answers for a whole category as much as taking each shooting on a case by case basis and asking the most important question which is “Did the person have to shoot” and we use the standard of would a competent peer make the same judgment and in this case I don’t think they would
@DeludoSui thats not how self defense works. Much in the same way if someone pushed you and you punched them til they died you would be be charged, because somewhere in there they weren't a threat anymore and you used excessive force. Same applies here he pushed him which was assault, and like they said he had every right to pull his pistol out no ones arguing that. Now had the man kept charging him that would be self defense, but because he stopped and was in the process of retreating he was no longer a threat which makes shooting him unjustified and not self defense. So the video does not show self defense and therefore shows an unjustified shooting. And against your argument of him being doomed because it was political this whole video is the interrogation right after this incident happened, he was doomed that day. And like many others have said he's had a history of getting to altercations, even drawing his firearm on a woman with her kids in the car. He was pushed and wanted a chance to use his firearm plain and simple
Corrrect indeed! As a matter of fact- EVERY video on this channel is a prime example of NEVER TALK TO LAW ENFORCEMENT WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY PRESENT!!!! I don’t care if police are interviewing you about your cat getting hit by a car.. HAVE A LAWYER PRESENT or end the interview. PERIOD THE END! People can be so clueless. Smdh.
@Max Schneiter wouldn't it be better and safer to report such a "crime" to the appropriate person. It goes both ways, instead of arguing with a female who obviously isn't going to listen. There are always better and safer options. You could always lock yourself in a closet and have the most scientifically safe water and food fed to you (can go on and on).
@Jacob P Here is the difference: it is perfectly legal and not unreasonable to verbally confront someone if you disagree with what they are doing. On the otherhand, It is perfectly illegal and unreasonable to assault someone because they confronted someone you know. Freedom of speech does not allow you to assault someone, it does allow you to tell them you dont like what they are doing though.
@Pareen Pattni Of course, every American is entitled to legal representation. It's literally stated in the Miranda Rights that are read to people who are placed under arrest. There is also this little thing we call "Innocent until Proven Guilty".
@Max Schneiter I agree not only America but the whole world. But most of the times guilty people are made to win the case by the defenders attorneys manipulative talks which is unjust
@Pareen Pattni of course...you don't? So if Pareen Pattni thinks he is guilty he shouldn't get legal representation? The beauty of our legal system is that everyone, guilty or not, is entitled to a lawyer. I know you know everything and you would never ever convict an innocent man but we are all not so perfect. Let me guess, Trump also had the election stolen from him, right?
@N Anderson I am not a trump supporter, mate. Please don’t make such assumptions and no I do not know everything. I only expressed my thought because sometimes people who have committed the crimes get away by proving not guilty with the lawyers and it’s unjust. Nothing else 🙂
@Pareen Pattni "better that a 100 guilty men go free than one innocent man be punished".....again, it's the beauty of our legal system. Who decides they, "committed the crime and got away"? you? If you don't understand that concept you should probably avoid commenting. It's legal theory 101.
@N Anderson Did I once mention I will decide? Don’t say things I didn’t mean and make stupid assumptions. I was expressing my thought like a thousand other people here and you have no right to tell me not to comment. I don’t want to comment anything on America’s “ beauty of the legal system”. If you don’t agree with me, it’s fine. It appears that you tend to know everything and all the concepts and can’t stand anyone else to say anything against your thought process , good for you.
1 like
N Anderson2020-12-16 06:48:10 (edited 2020-12-16 06:48:39 )
@Pareen Pattni lol. wow. you said in your first comment (making the smart point, he shouldn't get a lawyer because he is guilty - isn't that you deciding smart guy?) because guilty people w/ lawyers have been found not guilty sometimes. my question was/is, HOW DO YOU KNOW THEY WERE GUILTY? because of the news? if they are found not guilty, they are...NOT GUILTY. but this is my fault...argue with a fool, look like a fool.
Finally they must be a erasing all the comments were people use common sense. This is the first one I have seen and I have read a lot. Seems like you have to tiptoe around with your speech anymore or people want to use violence against you quick
@AugustusCaesar I agree, but if the accusation of over-escalation of violence is EVER thrown around here, then both parties are supremely guilty. The difference is:
@Max Schneiter “Only a dangerously violent person would react the way he did to an argument” I’m sure the people tore you a new one for this upsurdly hilarious claim. But to just make it easy 1. You require a reality check. 2. More importantly: if you saw ur wife and kids (or S/O and kids, family, etc) and there was a dude getting in their face, yelling and more, you’re not gonna do shit about it? LMAO please
0 likes
Max Schneiter2021-05-29 13:36:35 (edited 2021-05-29 13:49:36 )
@Kingof Grim It is not a "normal reaction" to blindside someone without saying a word just because he is arguing with your wife. If he had survived he would have been charged with assault. If you honestly think that it is acceptable to assault someone for arguing with someone you know than you need to get some anger management treatment.
He shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
@Max Schneiter You said it perfectly. The shooter responded to a physical aggression. And the aggressor responded to a simple verbal argument. It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself but at least he got rid of that animal. (whoever resorts to violence in an argument is an animal).
@Michael Zomsuv Yes. I agree that this was justified self defense, but the shooter was also very stupid and largely responsible for his own predicament. He strikes me as very naive and childish, playing cop like a little kid. Worst of all, because of his ego I think he was afraid to admit to the police that he was scared after the push. You cannot claim self defense with a lethal weapon unless you feel that your life was in danger. His inability to admit that did him in.
@Max Schneiter Except his life was threatened. He was pushed from the back on a concrete floor. People DIE ALL THE TIME from falling wrong. He would have died or end up in a wheel chair had he fell on the head.
My larger point was a mental exercise; ask yourself these questions: How many people fall per day? How many people are shot per day? Which action results in a larger number of deaths per event?
@Christian Van Matre Why are you asking the same questions again? I answered everything in my last comment. To repeat myself, deaths by falling is #4 cause of death in the USA. Death by gun shot is #14. There's 100 times more deaths by falling than death by gun shots in the US.
@Ark worthy it’s totally legal to stop a threat with the presence of a gun if the conditions are legally justified. Brandishing a weapon when not justified is still very illegal
@Anonymous Bosch Sure, but there are lots of cases where the brandishing of a gun is legitimised by the use of the weapon, and vice versa the presence of the gun is de-legitimised by not having being used. There are therefore plenty of cases where you would be better of just killing someone. Or so it would seem.
@Ark worthy I don’t think it’s a good idea to kill anyone unless absolutely necessary for the survival or defense from grievous bodily harm for yourself or others. The idea that I’m legally better off taking a life if I’ve needed to draw my weapon makes me concerned about your training and mindset more than I’m concerned about the legal trends in our country. I’m going to assume you’re simply using a bit of hyperbole to make a point about the sometimes absurd rulings of our courts than being literal about killing people
@Anonymous Bosch That's exactly what I am doing. We're likely in agreement that killing anyone (outside of wildly unfortunate aggravated circumstances) is not a decent thing to do. That said, it's why I am remarking on how strange it is that in some cases, one is more likely to receive a tougher sentence if they DON'T pull that trigger. I understand the logic behind it, but I wish there were a better precedent for it.
@Ark worthy in that we agree, I negotiate things for a living and I sometimes forget all the ways we make points in loose talk when we’re casually writing
Parked in the handicap. Then assaults someone...he definitely getting shot! Then lawyer up! You know how many people get stomped out in a coma or dead...
@Nicholas Payne I'm not sure about that, imo the video doesn't decisively show that the victim was retreating. On the other hand, the victim had already acted violently seconds earlier so it stands to reason that he was likely to attack again.
@Anonymous Bosch Agree that it is manslaughter and the conviction was the correct outcome. BUT... it is also correct to say that the guy was a serious threat. After he shoved the shooter, he DID start to move towards him... and we can only speculate what would have happened had the shooter not brandished a gun. I dont think it is unreasonable to assume he would have put a serious beating on him. As Max said, only a dangerous person would react that way to a verbal argument.
This is a perfect example of who should not be granted a license to carry a firearm. Nobody is trying to take guns away from people. The vetting process needs to slow down and be done deliberately, with full on psychiatric evaluation being a part of it. In stages. Not unlike the process to obtain a pilot's license. Can't let sketchy people operate an airborne vehicle willy nilly, and can't let a sketchy person just be able to carry around a gun at the fkng Dollar store, enforcing parking laws. This is ridiculous. All you completely responsible folks who move around with firearms and know the severity of it, get on board keeping them out of the wrong hands please.
@DSW22 I disagree that him being a Karen made him deserve to be knocked down. That was literal assault and totally overboard. However, he shouldn't have retaliated the way that he did.
@Palahume idk. I don’t think he necessarily meant to knock him down so much as just push him for harassing his wife. He was standing up for his family.
@Danielle Walker This is true, however I think both Marquiese and Michael handled this situation wrong, although Michael handled it by far the most wrong.
Marquiese responded to a verbal altercation with physical violence, which generally speaking is not the correct response and is not a proportional reaction. However Micheal responded to non-lethal physical violence with deadly force.
The most that should have happened here was he could have pulled his gun out without firing. Marquiese had already backed up probably 5+ feet from Michael by the time he fired, so the shooting was 100% unjustified, a verbal warning would have been enough to defuse the situation and prevent any further physical violence.
People like Michael are too irresponsible to carry a gun if they don't understand reasonable escalation of force. Generally speaking you should always respond in proportion to the amount of force being exerted on you in these situations.
@Danielle Walker My point is he didn't even have enough time to figure out if the guy was "harassing" and "yelling"... And even if the guy was, that's not justification to push someone down, assaulting him physically. 🤦
@Palahume Everyone around knew there was yelling, including in the store (1:20). It appears that the yelling is why he went out (without any purchases, and leaving his 5 year old son in the store) to see what was happening, realised it was around his families car, then went to defend his family from someone behaving aggressively toward them.
@Archer Still not convinced that assaulting someone was the appropriate method of handling the situation. By doing that, he set him self up for an unfavorable reaction. 🤨🤔🤦
@Palahume Assaulting someone isn't appropriate, but you have to ask why the muppet doing 20 years verbally assaulted the deceased guys family, ergo setting himself up for the unfavourable reaction of being pushed over.
@Palahume He wasn't "just asking". As pointed out in the video: he was making a racket (so much so it could be heard in the shop itself). Assaults can be verbal you know.
He got as much time as the girl who tried to have her husband killed. If that doesn't seem wrong I don't know what does. He might have overreacted but when you are trained to use a concealed firearm you're told that by the time you pull your gun is when you should be fire your gun and never pull it before then. He was attacked from behind and thrown on the ground and was not ready to be physically attacked.
@Some Guy Oh some guy is saying words at my wife. Better push him to the ground without saying a word to him. Don't start fights with random people. Some are crazy and some are paranoid. Why risk your life starting a fight with a random dude at a gas station? His bad decision lead to a widow and fatherless children. He may not have deserved it but starting fights is a good way to eventually lose one. And when you lose one to someone smaller than you, it is probably through excessive force.
@Danielle Walker words should never lead to physicality or the next step will take place. It's common sense. Both were to blame, But being pushed to the ground makes you fearful for your life because you don't know what's going to happen next. Should have threw both your hands up directly into the air. That is the obvious surrender stance. Since he wasn't in a full-blown surrender stance I'm not 100% convinced he was going to leave him alone, more like thinking of a way to get that gun.
@WandererTheLost i don't understand why you say the victim started the fight. Even the cops agree, this guy started the fight. He started it by starting the whole encounter. Why is it, people forget the aggressor in self defense cases? If you start the interaction, you started the fight. This guy wouldn't be in jail, if he had just gone into the store in the first place Tell the store if you care that much. He wanted to be an ass, he started it all.
@Ghost of Sparta I didn't say him dying was the right penalty. I will point out that when he was drawing the gun out, the person had just hit him from behind, put him in a compromised position he could not easily retreat from, and was moving towards him again. This all happened as an escalation of talking even if that talking was heated that is not the appropriate response. I would also like to say that if he wanted to kill him, firing one shot and then stopping is not how someone looking to kill normally would go about it. If you have the right to shoot one bullet most people will not give you trouble for shooting many. I don't think he intended to kill him. If you run around getting physically violent to people you can take in a fight, then eventually you will find someone who knows they can't win that fight and has a gun. It was a bad situation all around but the person to escalate it was the father. He was the one who had the most to lose and his family paid that price. Jail does not make up for it and it was at least a decent amount his fault.
@Robin Galbraith If I tell you that you are breaking the law on the street does that give you the right to hit me in the back? IF you are bigger then I am and have just sucker punched me from behind should I not be afraid? I don't care if he was yelling at the top of his lungs (which he wasn't) physical violence was not the right response. He was hit to the ground from behind by a guy that looked like he could have kicked his ass badly. If he let that guy who already demonstrated that he was going to use physical violence first get next to him all it would have taken was a few good hits and he could have easily been knocked unconscious or killed. The guy was moving towards him on the ground where he could not easily have retreated from so pulling the gun at that point was understandable. After doing so and holding it there for the amount of time he did the guy was backing off and at that point shooing was the wrong action. That said, that guy had every intention and moving toward someone he had just thrown helplessly to the ground who he probably could have taken even in a fair fight. He didn't deserve to die from the only one bullet the guy shot but just remember that he started it and if the guy wanted to kill him, he could have easily shot him multiple times. If he was not going to get in trouble for shooting, then shooting multiple times would have been just as defensible. He didn't intend to kill that guy. He even sat there waiting for the police. Basically don't physically attack people and then assume that there isn't a chance they will be ready to go to far just like the father went to far. Mistakes on both sides but as a father you have much more to lose and his family paid the price.
@WandererTheLost It is not your duty to enforce the law but it is a father's duty to protect his family. Regardless of assault, there is no justification to heart shot a retreating unarmed man.
@David If you watch the video he had already attacked him and was moving in up until the point where the gun was pulled. It was safe to assume he was going to continue his assault. That father sure did a good job protecting his family from words. Those hurt feeling he saved them from will comfort them in their nights without him.
@Manuel Arango You can not honestly tell me that after he pushes the guy to the ground, you don't see the guy moving towards the now prone person. He is pulling up his pants and moving towards him after already pushing him down. If he didn't pull a gun that guy would have beaten that man for who knows how long. People who sucker punch people without a word are not the kinds of people who then have a rational conversation. Your only argument was they skinny guy was "attacking" his wife with scary words. That required physical violence on someone who didn't even know he was there.
@WandererTheLost Yes, he moves to him after the push to see what the fuck was happening with that man, and in that case it is the minimal result of being violent verbaly to a woman just because you think you are a policeman or a lawyer idk. You are normalizing verbal violence. I know he was wrong at pushing him, but if you put yourself in his shoes and you see a man being danger to your family, you will want to intercept him.
Ideally, they would have talked about it, but do you really think that screaming madman was going to speak civilly? That's why he will get old in prison,
@Palahume how would you react if saw someone you didn't know harassing your wife from a distance and you have no idea what his intentions are with her?
@Manuel ArangoYou can't possibly believe that the guy advancing on the person he just assaulted was going to "see what was happening." You can't be that naive. You pull your pants up like that when you are preparing to do something physical and moving in on someone you just attacked who is prone on the ground gives few options of a physical nature that isn't horrible. The moment he stopped was when the guy reached for the gun and not one moment before. You can't lie about this. It is in the video you are commenting on. I am not saying the guy didn't move back AFTER he knew he could not just beat up a defenseless person who he had once again just attacked from behind. The guy on the ground had no chance of escaping the advancing thug. Also just so you know, violence is defined as "behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something." Verbal violence is a ridiculous claim.
@WandererTheLost After the push, if the man just apoligized, there would not be any beating. If a man is screaming at your wife or family it’s reasonable to push him.. maybe he’d have beaten his ass if he continued yelling shit, or maybe he would just chase him away and go back with his children
@Tyler Pearson That's easy... You walk up and figure out what's going on, then determine what first of action needs to take place. Most things can be handled through talking. But you wouldn't know if violence is necessary unless you listen/talk first. 🤦
@Manuel Arango Go around pushing people who "deserve" it. I hope they respond in the correct way of calling the cops on you. If you are really lucky, you might be the next conversation I have in the comments section.
@David I think the fact he waited till the guy was retreating made shooting the wrong choice but pulling a gun was the only thing that stopped that guy from moving in on him to beat his ass. Being assaulted for saying something even if it is confrontational is wrong and that guy was very obviously getting himself ready to move in on him in a position he could not easily leave. Anyone who says physical violence is ok because they don't like what a person is saying is a criminal. I think he was in the wrong for shooting but he had every right to feel threatened.
@WandererTheLost ? Go around yelling at women. If you have luck they will call the police, but if not, you will be beaten instead you shoot to kill your “agressor” who is defending his family and you will spend your life in prison.
@DSW22 That was not “stupid and trivial.” Parking in a handicapped parking spot without a reason is illegal. There are people who legitimately need to use that spot. Michael was doing his civic duty.
@Ainsley Oliver No, no he wasn't. He would have taken a picture of the car in the parking spot and reported it to the police. As he himself said before, he only started the confrontation because he had a weapon. It is not his civic duty to confront people committing a very minor crime, in fact it is his duty to REPORT the crime so that police may handle the rest, since that is their job.
@SECONDQUEST I wished they would look at the actions they are promoting and make better life decisions. I wouldn't be here arguing with them about how assaulting random people is wrong if I didn't want them to change and be a better person. I am emphasizing the effects of someone's actions to show them that maybe physical violence isn't the answer. Unless you are trying to say that it should be. Is that what you are saying? Are you saying that there is no consequences (justified or not) that you should consider before making such a rash decision? Did you not see what happened to the person in the video who thought how the commenter did?
@WandererTheLost Yeah it's a sticky situation, but a failed attempt to flex the stand your ground legislation. Defendant would've been better off pleading guilty and blaming the shooting on nerves rather then getting caught up in the lie "he was taking 2-3 running steps towards me"
@David He should have not talked to the cops. Innocent or guilty, they are there to use your own words against you. They NEVER use what you say to defend you you. Even if they should.
@Palahume He should've yelled "back off" and save his shot. It's an unfortunate situation for everyone really, dude wasted some great years for him, he was 48 durirng the interrogation, he's gonna leave prison at around ~70 if he ever does. And well, the man who died, well, we all know why it sucks for their family.
There are so many ifs but sadly this is how things went. Hope both families can heal.
@Heather Tzogas I could, but then people like you who feel like they have some authority on who has the right to speak and what people's option's should be. You would think no one disagrees with you and you are just objectively right. Heaven forbid any kind of conversation that isn't 100% what you believe. Next you are going to tell me someone should come up and assault me for saying things you don't agree with. Violence against people who don't agree with you is justified right?
@Heather Tzogas I mean you are the one posting things with no content in them. State your opinion unless you are afraid of how it makes you look. It appears you are on the side of random street assault but if you are just here to tell people not to talk, that would be an interesting stance to take, in of all places, a comment section.
@mdo686 Rioters rioted, Kyle wanted to save the local businesses and population, rioters attacked him, Kyle attacked them.
Is being a year too young to own a gun really that much of a crime in comparison to having an entire mob armed to the teeth trying to kill a 17 year old? People only bring up "he was too young to own an AR15!!!" because theres literally nothing else to go on in attacking him.
@WandererTheLost actually that’s completely speculatory, as the defendant stated no words were exchanged, there is no direct evidence to suggest that he was intending to beat the man up other than the fact that he pushed him and the step forward advance, it was a completely nonverbal exchange. You clearly have zero sympathy for this poor man who lost his life and the family Michael Drejka left fatherless and I suggest you take the time to rewatch this video, consider your intentions in this conversation, and really think about what if motivating you to stick up for a man who committed murder without a second thought on an unarmed man in front of his family. He died in front of his five year old son, do you have no shame?
@Selin Binay Your level of conviction for a person who assaulted someone from behind baffles me. I would like to think in society, we are above the worry that someone would become physical violent on a person they don't like from behind. The shooter was doing nothing provocative except saying things the assaulter either didn't agree with or in a way he didn't like. Neither is justification for the attack. He then pulled up his pants as I am sure many people do right before they intend to do something physical while moving towards a person they just threw on the ground. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to guess where a physical attack from behind is going from there. All of that said, the punishment for just an assault should not be death but I contend that the man with the gun had every right to both assume that man was coming after him as he had ALREADY come after him. He was also in a position that left little chance for escape. Him dying in front of his child is terrible but he showed his intentions and that man who pulled the gun had every right to assume he was going to be attacked not only by the actual recorded attack but his actions after. Who are you to say that he would have not beaten the shooter to death? As you said, you have no direct evidence that he wouldn't have killed the guy he just attacked. I do have the direct evidence of showing he was a violent person who intended to at the very least be ready to continue being violent. You bring shame into this like that somehow makes your lack of facts or acknowledging the ACTUAL EVENTS that are recorded in front of you a strong defense. And before you say "well he was proven guilty," have you not seen innocent people on many of these videos go to jail. When you say things like you last line, you are trying to push feelings to stop a conversation you are not winning with any evidence as you put it. For shame.
@WandererTheLost girl BYE I just explained to u from a legal standpoint why your point makes no sense and your response to me is a non objective argument about how assault is worse than murder you need to zip it up before u hurt yrself I’m done lmao
@WandererTheLost and by the way since you seem to be completely ignorant to the way law actually works, verbal assault and abuse IS a crime and the legal definition of assault does not require an actual physical confrontation to take place. You are talking about battery.
@Selin Binay I was going by the actual quoted definition of assault in the dictionary. And is that really your whole takeaway from a paragraph reply? You instead of engaging in any defensible points to anything I said, you argue that I don't know what assault is when I directly quoted it from a dictionary? Furthermore, at least in the US, verbal assault is not a crime. It is only considered assault if you promise or imply violence that you can then actually back up. If he was looking at the license plates to see if the person had committed a crime, it is not far to assume that they were thinking about the law and not standing there promising the hurt the person but that I would have to listen to the trial directly to find out. That said it definitely was not brought up in the video and unless you have some evidence to his accusation of threatening them, then you are just grasping at straws. It is kind of pathetic that is all you had to focus on after the whole paragraph I had giving points. That was all you found to criticize and even then you were not correct. I am surprised you didn't just go with the moral high ground again with no supporting evidence. Be so outraged that you can't bother coming up with an argument. Nothing like trying to shut down conversation because of feelings. I would love for you to have an argument. I am open to discussion. Too bad that is not what is happening.
@Palahume You were doing well until the end. SYG law in Florida states he had every right to defend himself the way he did but don't let laws and statutes get in the way of you supporting the afrocentric bandwagon agenda in here.
@JunkEt You just don't understand or agree with Florida SYG law. It specifically allows "deadly force" to be used.....those words are in the statute so go read it and educate yourself.
@Danielle Walker Nope, McGlockton committed the first crime by pushing Drejka = assault and rightfully ate a bullet for it. Bullets are great teachers...hopefully now his sons will learn that they can't lay hands on a stranger if somebody is talking to/yelling at mommy for breaking the law.
@Jeremiah S Kyle put out a burning dumpster and that angered a bald guy who ended up chasing and assaulting him (Kyle). Kyle ran til he was cornered and the bald lunatic that was chasing him, shouted "F-CK YOUUUU" and charged Kyle. Kyle opened fire.
Kyle was trying to help said bald lunatic but the mob was gathering and the hostile heat/attention was rising on him so he ran away, then people started chasing him and you know the rest.
If putting out a dumpster fire that was intended to be pushed towards a wall of cops is provoking then I guess thats your perspective, I cant judge.
@Sabrason @Sabrason This is straight up incorrect. No SYG law will allow the use of deadly force when it isn't justified. This is a case where the use of deadly force was not justified because the subject in question was retreating at the time the gun was pulled, and no further acts of violence occurred upon the individual who fired. In fact no further threat, implicit or explicit seems to have occurred. Not to mention the subject was only pushed, he wasn't hit over the head with a blunt object, he wasn't stabbed, and generally he wasn't injured in such a way as to cause grievous bodily harm or death.
The SYG law does not permit you to fire upon a retreating individual. Now if he was pushed and then his attacker continued his assault that's a different story, but that's not what happened here. Besides this is all a moot point anyway because he was found by a jury to be in the wrong here. Unless the jury and the judge are all not as informed about the statute as you, which seems to be what you are implying here, I would say he was wrong.
I sincerely hope for everyone's safety that you do not carry a firearm.
@Palahume The guy was instigating a fight with a woman sitting in a car with her children in the backseat. Any husband walking out would’ve had an issue with that. I know Minewood. He’s lucky all that happened was he got shoved
@John Kordulak By that logic the guy with the gun didn't just perceive a threat but acted on
actual assault. You are promoting violence against people talking in ways you don't like. Drejka was not threatening them. He was telling them they broke the law. The funny part is they did break the law. Then when Drejka was telling them, he was pushed from behind and thrown to the ground. The guy then pulls up his pants and is ready to move in. That is not the action of someone defending someone. After he threw him to the ground he wasn't any threat to hurt them but that man wanted to hurt Drejka again because of words. IT IS ON THE VIDEO. From what you are saying, I should be able to beat you for your words on here. Words are not going to attack you. The person was not there to assault them. He said something they didn't like. Even giving them the most favorable opinion of him thinking there was a threat, he didn't respond by asking what was going on. He was mad and attacked. That is not a reasonable opening to a situation which AT BEST he didn't know well as he had just got there. You mentioned boarder policy as well. It sounds like you are the type of person to make this some sort of race thing and also try and change the argument because they have nothing that supports them. It is really kind of sad. Come back when you have more then emotions. It really makes you look like an idiot when you think that you can win an argument by trying to change the subject.
@Connie Talking is not instigating a fight. Having a different opinion is not justification for violence. She was not being threatened. You thinking that it is ok to hurt someone who is saying something you don't like. That is the reason there is as much violence as there is. Why would it be ok for someone to be attacked for voicing an opinion. You're doing it right here and not everyone agrees with you here, but I don't think you should be assaulted for it. You seem to think that would be fine and that actually scares me. He was not there threatening the kids or her safety. Being upset is not a justification for violence and if you think it is, that makes you a criminal.
@Connie I would hardly call someone questioning another person about handicap tags a "fight". Also, the truth is, the vast majority of people (including husbands) would not run up and shove someone like that guy did without knowing what was going on. He should have known by doing so he was risking his life by not knowing how the other person would react. Simply foolish behavior.🤦
@Sabrason Statements from witnesses (and to an extent the video) proves he was making a racket and being argumentative. He was the aggressor, and if anyone wants stand your ground to have any legs, then it is the deceased who everyone should acknowledge had the right to defend their family from that aggressor.
They shooters own words after a previous incident show he knew he was the aggressor in similar incidents, and he was causing himself trouble. He even said he couldn't help himself (and I doubt he knew where he could turn for help).
So no: I don't buy this "Drejka was innocent" or "Drejka was defending himself" mentality. He was the instigator of the incident, the aggressor, and the last person with any realistic right to stand his ground.
@Danielle Walker - But the problem is Drekja did fall down and that makes it assault. Battery is raising and arm/leg or object at someone, and battery is phyically causing harm.
@JunkEt - LOL - Apparently you need to read the law on assault. - Putting your hands on someone is assault. Look up the legal definition. People need to keep their hands to themselves - that is part of the law - it falls under "assault".
@Sabrason Yes, he was so upset about illegal parking that he parked illegally himself. He got upset over a lot of things, and repeatedly waved a gun around. He threatened a few people, and commented that people were lucky he didn't blow their heads off. He commented to the owner of this store that he kept getting himself into trouble, but couldn't help himself, and this is the real shame. He obviously needed help, but didn't know how to get it. Hence he continued to get triggered over things that he should have ignored (given he did these things himself), and that triggering led to him behaving in an agressive and abusive manner several times before this particular incident. I have no reason, given his history, to believe he was "talking" or being generally peacable, and plenty of reasons to suppose this incident was caused by him behaving in an aggressive and abusive manner. I think it would have been better, and this incident wouldn't have occurred, if he could have gotten the help he desperately needed. Instead a man is dead, and another is in prison, which suits noone.
@Nun Ya Ok? And? I never said it wasn't assualt or even implied that. I never even brought that up. I brought up the amount of force used, and how I share the opinion of the jury in that it was excessive.
@Palahume See the problem with you people going in here and saying that "he shouldn't have pushed him over" just lets people argue that he was in the right to shoot him, which he was not, in anyway whatsoever. Of course you shouldn't, or should I say, "your not allowed" to push people over. It doesn't really matter though because at the end of the day, the guy shot him and killed him. Like what is wrong with you, your basically saying it was his fault he got shot, like what lol, so if you push someone down, and they shoot you, and you die, your saying its your fault that they decided to take out a gun and shoot you.
@JunkEt See the problem with you people going in here and saying that "he shouldn't have pushed him over" just lets the worse people argue that he was in some way in the right to shoot him, which he was not, in anyway whatsoever. I know your not saying that, but your allowing other people to say that.
@Local_Brain_Error // Synaptic_Misfire_Detected Ah I see. If that's the case, then he was just being a major Karen. Still not sure that deserved to be assaulted though...🤔
WOW this guy was looking for trouble and he found it, too bad the shopper got killed I just hope a guy walking around with a loaded gun in his pocket and looking for someone else with a minor infraction to bully unloads his cowardly venom and ends up killing the poor victim. SAD. Boy it makes you wonder what he’s going to do to minor infractions he finds in prison. Ha. Ha. Ha. Seriously hope he never sees freedom. Maybe some hard mean time in solitary and psych ward.
@Archer "Yes, he was so upset about illegal parking that he parked illegally himself.
He got upset over a lot of things, and repeatedly waved a gun around.
He threatened a few people, and commented that people were lucky he didn't blow their heads off.
He commented to the owner of this store that he kept getting himself into trouble, but couldn't help himself, and this is the real shame. He obviously needed help, but didn't know how to get it. Hence he continued to get triggered over things that he should have ignored (given he did these things himself), and that triggering led to him behaving in an agressive and abusive manner several times before this particular incident."
THE ABOVE IS ALL COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY IRRELEVANT TO THE INCIDENT THAT OCCURRED.
You have no reason (OTHER THAN THE VIDEO THAT PROVES HE WAS ONLY TALKING/ARGUING), given his history (WHICH IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT TO THE CASE), to believe he was "talking" (VIDEO PROVED HE DID NOTHING BUT TALK TO JACOBS!) or being generally peacable,(TALKING IS PEACEFUL) and plenty of reasons to suppose this incident was caused by him behaving in an aggressive and abusive manner (AGAIN, TALKING/HAVING A HEATED DISCUSSION ABOUT JACOBS BREAKING HC PARKING LAWS IS NOT ILLEGAL AND PERFECTLY WITHIN HIS RIGHT).
McGlockton was a deadbeat loser and dreg of society with a history of assault, a drug addict husband/father high on MDMA in front of kids, driving his kids around while high on MDMA, high on MDMA when he assaulted a guy almost twice his age - in front of kids and bled out - in front of his kids. Society is far better off without him and so are his kids.
@VELI That's only because you don't understand or agree with Florida's SYG law which clearly states that deadly force can be used if fear of bodily harm is present. McGlockton caused bodily harm by initiating the assault so Drejka using a gun was not only justified it was even more justified because it was used to prevent ADDITIONAL bodily harm.
@Palahume He was known to cause trouble all the time in that parking lot. He is the very type of gun owner who should not own a gun. Dude was just itching to use it. Listen to him talk as if it's his store. Territorial loser who felt tough cause of a gun.. The guy's 3 young children and his wife was in the car it's a natural reaction to defend you family.
@Palahume Clearly you don't have the full story. This dude did this all the time. He was empowered from his gun and was just itcbing/looking for a chance to use it. If it wasn't this time it would be another time. You say if this guy didn't push him then all would have been fine. How do you know? They could have kept arguing and he may have done the same thing. Truth is if he didn't approached the family and start yelling at a woman and her three kids in the back seat, which is fucking wack to begin with, nothing would have happened and he wouldn't be doing 20 years for manslaughter and 4 children wouldn't be without their father. Did you even watch the video? He has issues bro. He should have just minded his own business. This is the perfect example of a terrible gun owner.
@Sabrason Honestly: you're advocating for a situation where any nutcase can come and terrorise you or your family, with "stand your ground" as their trump card against you trying to defend yourself.
The guys mental state absolutely is relevant because you keep arguing as though he was just a normal guy talking. Witnesses stated that he wasn't just talking. The video shows it, but you're too blinded by some weird political motive to see it.
Was the jury made aware of the defendant’s prior history of aggravation to other motorists, admissible in this case? Or does Florida law not allow a persons previous conduct to be included in evidence? I’m from Sydney, Australia.
@Tommy Lin McGlockton was a drug addict high on MDMA who had a history of assault including a PO so he "did this all the time" also. This time, he assaulted the wrong guy and died. Lesson learned.
@Sabrason does that make his life worth any less? Does that make this shooting any more justified? If no then wtf are you talking about!? Doesn't change anything in this case. Stop defending this action. He pushed someone who was yelling at his family cause he was defending them. Thus guy illegally killed him. Do you think we should just shoot people who push us? Do you own a gun cause if this is how you feel you should turn in your permit.
@Tommy Lin Well, the fact that McGlockton was a horrible father and drug addict high on MDMA at the time and had a history of assaulting a PO makes his life worthless, so yeah. We certainly don't need those dregs of society living among us, that's for sure.
Should have been given life or, at the very least, 60 years, just to ensure he doesnt go around being a Karen and then shooting people who are angry when their family members are practically getting stalked and harassed by him after he intentionally created an environment that made the wife and the kids feel threatened and unsafe. Please dont blame the father for reacting that way towards a man who was being intentionally hostile towards his wife and kids over gd parking.
2 likes
Anna H2021-07-09 16:04:09 (edited 2021-07-09 16:04:29 )
@Sabrason talking about being high on ecstasy like it's the most morally bankrupt thing a person could do is hilarious. Even if someone was addicted to "hard" drugs and had assaulted a cop, they're still a human being with fundamental rights and inherent worth. You saying that people who don't cling to your conservative ideals are better off dead is super sus
@Palahume them you didn't watch the video. In the interview the cops DIRECTLY address that very aspect: "instigating and provoked a confrontation over a handicapped parking".
@Curtis Jackson Oh, thanks for letting me know that I didn't really watch the video...I want sure what I actually did, cause you know... Others know more about what I do than I do..lmao 😆😉🤦
@WandererTheLost he shouldn't have pushed him down, but there was no need for a confrontation at all. The victim did move towards the shooter after pushing him, but looked like he was intimidating him and not attacking him physically. There's no justification for him to shoot, especially once the victim started backing away.
@Palahume he was being a karen. Its a convenient store. Not an important retail place like the mall or amusement park where a handicap spot is really needed. He was in the wrong place to think he can be handicap karen and shoot ppl that dont have the tag. Would hate for the same to happen to that baby in your picture. 🥲
@Palahume Lets wait until Gideon is older ☺️See if he gets shot my a stranger for taking up for his wife. Hits home when its someone you love huh? Keep Gideon safe.
@L 432hz That will never happen though because Gideon will know better than to just run up and push summer random dude down, like the tool in this video did. He'll be raised far better than that and will know the appropriate way to act. 🤦
This is why I live in the state I do, u would never be found guilty, i dont remember alot of this but if push someone to the ground and walk up on them ur gonna get shot, point blank dont assault someone u never know what's gonna happen and alot of the time especially in my state its perfectly legal, especially if ur defense is correct, if he pushed u and kept approaching, even if all he did was push you and u hit ur head and feel like he could take ur weapon, I think it can be considered too far see now I'm talking myself in and out of if its justified it all depends
It's not worth dying for to defend ur families pride, it's never worth it, he went out there worse case(which happened he gets killed) best case he catches an assault charge over a mistake he caused, yes fighting over a dumb parking spot doesnt mean anything to him but to some people it's a big deal..... and he lost his life over it, what most people dont seem to understand is dont let ur pride and ur emotions get u in trouble or killed, his wife I'm sure would much rather him be here right now then defend her honor by assaulting someone elderly. If he'd went out there and apologized or just left the area, or at the very least just yelled at the guy without violence we would have never heard about this. U never know how someone is going to react, I've heard so many stories of people getting road rage flipping someone off or yelling or following them only to end up getting shot, or in most cases their car shot up, just situations that u should never be involved with
@Palahume if you go around looking for trouble you can’t expect flowers. this guy had harassed people before and finally found himself with someone who wasn’t willing to take none of his shit. he knew that at some point he’d get his ass beaten, but of course he being the coward he is couldn’t take the heat and shot at him.
@Marcello Those words could never be more ironic... "If you go around looking for trouble (parking in places that aren't designed for you and assaulting people unnecessarily by shoving them to the ground)", then you're bound to get shot one day. The assailant should have known better and I'm sure that whole situation could have been resolved a better way. 🤔🤦
@Palahumeman pointed his gun at people before and you still think that “it could’ve ended differently”, yea no. if it wasn’t this guy, then it was going to be someone else. he had a gun ready with him in case of someone reacting, your argument is weak. he had no reason to shoot at the victim, and it was proven in court as well. there are many things you could do that aren’t defending criminals in youtube comments.
Bro even if I was pushed to the floor I wouldn't shoot the guy who did it wtf? There's getting beat up and there's getting killed. Guns should always be a last resort especially if the "attacker" doesn't have a deadly weapon
@Archer has the most valid point here. Even if he was pushed down. You just shoot somebody? Cause you were on the ground, but still had the higher ground? I don’t understand. He got pushed, because the defender of the family saw a threat, harassing the nurturer of the family. Obviously he is the victor here, however, because the coward is still alive, unfortunately.
@nullin void Thank you for the love! So your saying you need to be emotional to be disgusted when a man knocks out his girl, his black girl? That makes zero sense. How bout you familiarize yourself with what your actually talking about & then try again. No woman was killed here. Smfh throwing insults when you have NO CLUE what your talking about. Typical
@nullin void Also you were talking bout black WOMEN not just this black WOMAN so you made every situation have something to do with it. That's what the Ray Rice incident has to do with this. Your trying to twist it now cause I called out your beyond inaccurate statement which is not very surprising seeing as you don't know what your talking about in the 1st place.
@DSW22 he shouldn’t have put his grubby hands on him. That’s what happens when you always respond with compulsive violence. Marquiese got a reality check
@DSW22 no one has a right to do violence over your words. You can never justify violence in the situation. Mr Drejka however once his gun was drawn waited for police and charged the man with assault.
@Danielle Walker someone yelling at your wife is no means for assault. Granted he should have pulled the gun and backed off to his vehicle and called police. Charged the man with assault.
@KoilBooly They actually weren't though but ok, and I'm not acting that way at all I never claimed that I would have done any different in that situation, so you bringing that up makes absolutely no sense.
I just don't understand why the family was parked in a handicapped spot. Could they not park 10 extra feet away from the curb in a legal space? The whole thing is just stupid. Why tf were they even there? Like this could have been avoided if Drejka minded his own business, but it could have been avoided as well if they had just parked...legally.
@Sebastian .Mel. Michaelis Awh shut up Point is he’s not a cop. You pick up your phone like a normal Karen and make a complaint if it’s that serious. No one deserved to die. Like you said he shudda minded his own business and like I said call a real cop. Just because you have a gun on your waste and you feel brave doesn’t make you a cop. He felt brave and he was looking for trouble bc if that gun was at home nun of that would have transpired.
@DSW22 you know, If you re-watch the video, Marquise keeps moving towards Drejka after pushing him down. He only stops and backs up when the gun starts coming out. I had first disbelieved Drejka when he said that Marquiese took a step towards him. I now believe he was right about the forward step, but wrong if he said that the step happened after the gun came out. Marquise wasn't done with the pursuit, even after the shove. If MK had not had the gun, I think Marquise was still intent on further battering Drejka, if he had kept talking in any way unapologetically. The skinned arm was completely Marquise's fault. When you shove someone, you take responsibility for whatever happens to them until they regain control of their situation. In the video where the narrator says "Marquise sees this, and starts backing up", the narrator SHOULD have said, "Marquise sees this, and reverses his forward motion."
@V L It isn't about whether or not someone "deserves" to die, its about imminent threat. People have been kicked and stomped while on the ground and killed in his same situation
I always told myself if I ever owned a weapon . Wich i don't and never will because it is illegal in the state I live in , but if I was able to or lived in a state where u can carry , I would never leave my house with it for any reason . It will jus be home for protection purpose only and protection of my family . When someone Carry's it jus opens the window for you to use it in any little situation. Even if I got into a fight I wouldn't get any weapon . It would literally have to be like someone coming into my home to cause harm or death to me and my family . That's exactly what happen to this dude . He carried a weapon and any little situation or argument give him the reason to fire his weapon
This is why you do not speak to the investigator until you have a lawyer present - Miranda says "Anything you say can and will be used against you..." It does NOT say "Anything you say might let you go free" or "Anything you say will be used as evidence FOR your defense". Be as innocent as an angel, get a lawyer. The slightest misremembering of a single fact can slaughter you in court. A lawyer will stop you from talking yourself into prison.
I was more impressed with their choice in personnel to do the interview, perhaps it was coincidence due to region but looked like a bunch of “good ole boys” that he thought he’d get props from. His language made me laugh and I can imagine the officers thought it was a gas too. Laughed out loud at the part where he used “force multiplier “ or whatever and it just fell dead.
"buries himself", exactly the verb I was thinking of the entire time through the interview as he made more and more damaging statements for his defence.
i honestly dont see that he feels any remorse from what he did he feels he did the correct thing his just crazy i feel sorry for the victim family n his family for having a crazy person, omg he was pushed by the victim for yelling at his wife or girfriend dont get things twisted
If he really thought he was at harm, I think he could have made the dude back off from just pointing the gun at him. Shooting the guy was without a reasonable doubt, murder. I'm glad people like this get locked up, I'm just sad he took that family's father forever.
@Herbert West never underestimate your opponent. Or, don’t put your hands on someone and expect them to play the same rules as you. Thought this was common sense...I mean if it wasn’t obvious can you go around putting hands on people and expect not to get hurt?
@The Blue Rock I don't get your point. Obviously I don't like any of the things they did, shoving people isn't a solution. Then again, shooting someone isn't either. Both of them had issues controlling their anger when confronted.
And to answer your question, in my opinion, no one in their right mind would threaten someone with a gun, heck I wouldn't shove someone wielding a knife.
He acts as if he’s another officer. Fact he used terms as “force multiplier” “neutralize the threat” “clear the area” “negative” shows this guy was looking to (in his mind) legally kill someone. 100% bwanna be L.E.O. but only to kill. He was simply pushed yet he says tackled.
Some asshole looking for problems! Hoping to have to use his big man weapon, and looked for any reason to!! Can’t stand people like this!
I personally ran into a busy body just like this with my daughter last summer! We were at Lowe’s, and they had a sale on hanging baskets of petunias for $5 apiece (they were red white and purple, for Independence Day, and they were clearing them out as the holiday had passed). I bought 10 baskets ($50 worth, we have a half acre garden, and a swimming pool, so plenty of room for them. I just don’t find 10 THAT over the top!). We hadn’t planned on this large flower purchase, and my daughter, who was 16 and a new driver at the time, was driving. She drives a small car and granted the flowers stuffed inside of it looked a little ridiculous, and a tad overkill, but I had loaded them off of a set of hanging bars right in front of the stores front doors (in front of Lowe’s employees, and other customers coming in and out) and in a normal, calm way (not like I was trying to grab as many as I could and GO!!).
Anyway, I had just finished loading the flowers, rolling the cart back up, and was getting in the car when my daughter noticed in her side mirror that there was a woman behind her car.
Apparently this busy body old bag thought it looked suspicious and assumed that we were stealing them, and she nominated herself Lowe’s security, and was taking pics of my daughters license plate. This didn’t click for us at the time (because we weren’t doing anything wrong)!!
So she then walked up (as I was putting on my seatbelt and getting settled in the car) to the drivers window and my naive sweet trusting RULE ORIENTED daughter put the window down to see what she wanted, at which time she shoved her camera in my daughters face, continued filming both of us and the flowers in the car, and asked us what we thought we were doing, and then for a RECEIPT for the flowers!!!! Can you imagine!?!
I told her I don’t owe you an explanation for ANYTHING, lady! At which time she said she was calling the police. I said you GO RIGHT AHEAD! Seems to me like THAT would be the APPROPRIATE thing to do!!!
Anyway my scared daughter (she thought it was going to devolve) drove away at that point, but I had to make her pull over about 500 feet away (in the same parking lot but where PSYCHO BROAD couldn’t see us and come continue her inquisition and videoing) so that she could calm down enough to drive home safely (upset, shaking, mad about being video’d by some STRANGER, and with a car FULL of petunias)!
I’ve played that incident over in my mind at least 20 times since it happened, wishing I’d have handled things differently. Maybe teach the BUSY BODY A LESSON! (Not physically of course- but possibly driving away WITH her iPhone.. which I’d have of course taken directly to the police station, so that SHE could explain WHY she was trespassing, accosting and being OBNOXIOUS)! In most of those scenarios, it’s probably a good thing I wasn’t quick witted at that moment, because it likely WOULD have devolved a bit! 🤬
Anyway, that’s the story of my run in with a busy body bitch! They’re out there! I can’t IMAGINE behaving like that! Inserting myself into ANY situation like she did, and especially how this guy did. Terrible. At least crazy loony bitch didn’t fire a GUN at anyone!!
Alex Xela - By removing the man that was shouting into the car where his wife and children were. If the deceased were a white man your comments would be a lot different. We have to start checking ourselves for prejudices. Let’s be honest.
Jimmy Pesto Let us be honest and admit that the deceased was wrong to do what he did. The shooter was also wrong to do what he did after. I don't see him as deserving of the kind of assault that could have killed him, which is what the deceased did.
Alex Xela - No it’s actually not enough if I’m being honest. The deceased pushed him after hearing his wife yelling outside, and going outside to see a man aggressively shouting into the car that his wife and children were in. His job was to remove that threat away from him family. He removed the threat and stepped back. The fact is, the man was shot as a result of pushing the shooter. But the shooter wouldn’t have been pushed if he hadn’t approached the car in the first place. So if anybody is to blame it’s the person who initiated the entire altercation. He’s not a police officer or security so it wasn’t his place to address them about where they parked. There are people payed to handle those situation so he and others don’t have to. He could’ve called the police and let THEM do their job. If these were 2 white men you’d see more clearly but your eyes and brain are blocked by your prejudice. You’re not allowing yourself to see past it. That man would’ve found any reason to use that gun and you would’ve found any reason to justify that use.
Alex Xela - Hey Alex, you deleted your response (I assume you knew how crazy you sounded) so I’ll post it back so I could respond.
“As I said, he wasn't doing anything that warranted such a blind sided push which could have even killed the shooter. If he had survived he'd be charged with assault.” - Alex Xela
Excuse the deceased for blindsiding the shooter and catching him off guard while he was busy screaming at his wife and children. How could that push have killed him? The only thing he got was a fake wrist injury which was later revealed to be fake. Let’s not talk about what COULD’VE happened and let’s focus on what DID happen. Again, you’ll play devil’s advocate in the shooters favor no matter what because you’re a racist who will defend him no matter what. The man could’ve came out speaking peacefully and you’d argue that the way his hands were moving were threatening. Despicable.
This guy talks like Mac from 'It's Alway Sunny In Philadelphia' in the episode where he's bragging about his his ability to assess threats. I wonder if he ever uses the phrase 'ocular patdown'.
he dehumanized them .. even if I was annoyed at her being parked there I would've backed off and left once I saw kids in the car .. but he didn't see them as a family
Can we just take a minute to all agree that the “what pretending to be crazy looks like” has snowballed into everyone getting recommended all of his other videos and thus watching them all ?
Oop.. yea that's exactly what happened to me. I'm in love with this content. Also seeing that kid try and self harm with a band-aid. It's surreal how violent and stupid these people can be.
Yes!!!! Since that day I’ve watched literally ALLLLL the videos. This is the last one 😩 I’m really sad. How did I not know about this channel with how many millions of views they get?!?
That is exactly my situation. And now I'm rewatching them all bc I was laughing so hard at Stephanie the sociopath and her ridiculous facial expressions that my family became curious so now we're just binging them all on tv. And I didn't think this kind of thing would interest me. I only really watch YT for ghost hunts
@Geno I saw a community post, I believe, maybe 2 days ago that said many more are to come and much more frequently. I think YT is pushing the channel bc it's about to change into a more regular upload kind of thing
DUDE for real, this is so fascinating! I never considered myself a "true crime" buff but I think I need to get into it, a lot of this stuff is really compelling watching.
I remember watching the Stephen McDaniel one a long time ago, but the 'what pretending to be crazy looks like' is what got me into the rabbit hole, yeah.
I'm so happy that video has made other JCS videos blow up.. I love all of his videos and he puts a tremendous amount of time and effort into these case evaluations.
Exactly that happened to me and I recommended the channel and talked about the content to couple of my friends. I've seen he wasn't uploading regularly, so I don't know what would I do if I watched them all.
Exactly what got me into this channel, I ignored that video for a good few days, finally gave in after a friend sent me the video to "what pretending to be crazy looks like"
@Hailey Walle I noticed that on every single video of his there are comments from 1 - 2 days ago, so I assumed we all got recommended that first video (because I did) and couldn’t stop there haha
@A B well obviously but there is a reason why there are 2 day old comments on most of his videos, and that’s because everyone is getting recommended his videos now, exactly as I wrote, stop being edgy
@Samir Dončić Not this video. The guy's channel has a recent video about people who do try to pretend to be crazy and apparently a lot of us had it suggested to us and ended up watching all the channels videos.
@pmclem02 ahh yea I see it now, I've read first comment slowly this time, I'm drinking alcohol which I don't do very often and felling very dizzy, probably I didn't understand context of comment at first, jesus I made 7 spelling mistakes writing just that first part of comment, autocorrect corrected it :), it's nice to be drunk I can tell you, I understand why people who are sad drink.
I’ve been here since the Stephen McDaniel case was released but I’ll admit “what pretending to be crazy looks like” definitely jolted me back into watching again after a couple week hiatus
@PackApunchV1 I hope that isn’t the message but I’m not so sure personally I too find it irritating when others adopt something I felt attached to in an obscure personal level. That being said I’m glad that JCS is getting so much more attention on a video “pretending to be crazy” (which I consider not his best work but one of) and hope that it encourages him to narrate more of these videos as more people watch his content
So it's not just me! I've been watching them in a random order, and this is one of the last ones. I hope JCS has some more content coming, his better videos are amazing!
I got recommended the one about Col. Russell Williams a few years ago on my school laptop of all things, and I've just sort of come back to them all every few months.
I've been watching these things since he had 3 videos on the channel and I'm really happy to see how much the channel has grown ever since. Insane quality content, very somber and educational.
@Dekoto true but to him, all he saw was a man loudly arguing with his wife about something. I've seen a lot of those end up with someone being suckered punched and in the floor bleeding and stunned so I kinda understand why he did that
@Some Dude yea but everything is based on personal experience yknow? And we know is Michael's experience of no fights so I have to guess the victim's. Everything is 20/20
@SpookyActionAtADistance while technically illegal, I think pushing someone down and then back up isn't that bad. Bad sure but nothing you should go to jail for yknow? Like when two drunks get in a fight, illegal sure but if no one is badly beaten, I'm not calling the cops
Bro he literally got pushed down for nothing and sprained his arm maybe shooting was bad but at that point you can’t blame he if he didn’t shoot what if that guy tackled and shot him
@Miller Time he was yelling arguing with his wife with his kids near, also the victim didn't have a gun and didn't tackle him so don't bring what if's that changes the whole situation
Piotr Małecki2021-06-07 13:23:14 (edited 2021-06-07 13:25:19 )
As much as I agree that this was excessive (guy thinks he's some kind of police officer after duty and is clearly a wannabe superhero), you have to say that maybe they shouldn't have parked on a handicapped only spot and maybe the guy should first ask 'hey, what's going on?' instead of attacking him right away?
@Hugh Mongous Not punching. Pushing. He simply pushed someone being up in his girlfriends face, out of the way. Wich is a rational action, when an aggressive dude is acting threatening towards a woman in the car.
@Hypogonadism Pushing someone so they fall down on a hard surface is even more dangerous than punching. It is not a rational action, it is assault, it can be deadly and it is inexcusable. If you act like an asshole like the guy who got shot, you sooner or later piss of the wrong people. Shooting him was overkill of course but this aggressive behavior is something that is simply not acceptable as a first resort without any warning.
Is it really terrible?? Would it be equally as "terrible" knowing that the kids were being raised by such arrogant, entitled and violent people such as their parents? Do you even consider that option? If you violently push or touch someone then in reality you forfeit your right to life and you should be ready for consequences. You do not know what kind of person you are pushing or punching! If people would keep their hands off of each other then maybe the world would be that much better!
On the plus side, the kids are so young that they likely won't remember. I think its kind of noble that the man's last instinct was to run to his kid in the store. I can tell by that act that he's a much better person than this arrogant parking lot cop.
@SpookyActionAtADistance Ah yes, because lightly shoving someone to get them to stop harassing your wife and kids justifies murder. I'm starting to think the people in this comment section have a very low value for human life if a pacifying move from someone who was clearly not intending on hurting the dude justifies his death.
@SpookyActionAtADistance Have you never seen the way adults interrupt people when others get into an argument with a loved one? Shoving is a common thing because the person yelling at your wife or child isn't going to listen when you say, "hey stop that". All their attention is directed at the person they are yelling at.
@SpookyActionAtADistance It was a light shove. You can tell by the video. There was very little force behind it. A normal person would be able to balance against it but for some reason this guy fell over.
@Miller Time how are you gonna say "what if" about the guy who got shot dead. boo hoo dude got pushed to the ground and hurt his wrist, that will heal. can't bring someone back to life and can't have his family unsee what they saw.
@Chris Phillips did you not hear that this guy had harrassed other people with a gun in the past including another woman with her kids in the car? did they all push him too?
@kameisha4eva2 I understand that but the past is the past. We are talking about the events that happened in this situation. Are you saying that because he did that in the past that he is no longer allowed to defend himself when the situation arises? I don't know you or what you have done in the past but I would want you to defend yourself if you needed to.
@Chris Phillips lol the past is the past. This is something he goes around doing. He does not have any type of authority not to mention he has pulled his gun on others including women and children. They were 100% wrong for parking there. The father had no right to push him either. But you cant ignore the fact that this is a reoccurrence lol he goes around literally looking for this type of shit. Im curious as to what made him pull his gun on the women and children prior...
@kameisha4eva2 haha... wow... none of that matters. He was violently pushed down and had no idea what was coming next. I don't care what he did in the past, it has no bearing on the assault that was inflicted on him in that parking lot. Even if he wished for this situation every day it doesn't matter.
@kameisha4eva2 let me ask you this. What if a police officer was thrown on the ground like that, do you think he would be justified in shooting? The answer is yes, yes he would. So why are most people treating this situation differently? Are officers lives worth more than micheals or yours or mine? The answer to that is no!
@Hypogonadism Do you have any idea of how many people die by hitting their head in the concrete? Drejka was in the right until before he shoot. This is obvious to everyone who saw the footage and the case was handled correctly. Since the aggressor was clearly stepping back, Drejka had no business to shoot his guns, but he had thousands of reasons to draw it
@Sabrason doesn't matter much to the police, honestly if you call saying you got pushed after an argument, the most they'll do is put it on a record and tell you to stop getting into arguments with strangers
He lost his life for parking like an asshole and attacking a person. Maybe his kids will grow up to not attack people... they might use their words.🤷♂️
@Piero Fasulli Drejka had no business walking up to the car, being a threat towards a woman in the car with her child, screaming and instigating a fight.
And it doesnt matter if the dead man stepped back or not. He could have stepped forwards, screaming at Drejka, and he still would be murdered if Drejka pulled a gun and shot him. American society is truly pathetic.
@Maria Santos Sure. He underestimated how big of a lunatic Drejka was. But he was well within reason to push him out of the way. As Drejka was the aggressor, picking a fight with his wife and kid.
@Nafi n Uncalled for to bring something like that up when it has nothing to do with this innocent man who died infront of his son. Come on man, at least set aside your hate in moments like these and reserve it for BLM posts or something.
@Dekoto some random man approached his girlfriend hostile over a parking sticker which was none of his business anyway, he had every right to push him and im sad he did not get to beat his face in
@Hypogonadism I understand the reason. He was protecting his family. It's a natural reaction. I can see many other men doing the same. However, it's not the best option. The reason why, as you have stated, is you don't know what kind of person you are dealing with. As you can see in Drejka's case, he has a history of creating conflict. Before the shooting, he had drawn his gun on at least 3 people. 2 times during road rage incidents, and one over the very same parking spot. His only means to defend himself is his gun. It is his first resort. And, it is what emboldens him to confront people. This is why pushing the guy is not a wise idea. If you must get physical with him, the correct thing to do would have been to kill him. 10 years sentence for manslaughter, 5 years with good behavior.
@Maria Santos One could even argue, that knowing who Drejka is, knowing he had a gun, it was more important to push him away from his family. This was literally an armed lunatic, who picked a fight with his wife and kid, acting aggresive, shouting at them
I find it incredibly strange, that anyone would try make it out as if the dude who got shot, was the aggressor. Thats my only objection.
@Abel Jacobo so you’re saying a guy deserves to be murdered in front of his wife and kids because he pushed him? I understand a fight breaking out, but shooting a feller?
@Hypogonadism Knowing Drejka, it is most important not to engage with him. You avoid people like this. But if you choose to engage, you must assume he is armed and act accordingly. Shoot first, then ask questions later. That's how it was when I stayed in Miami.
As for people making out Marquise as the aggressor, well, he's was a Black man. Some people here do not like Black people and will villainize them no matter what. It's clear he was defending his family. Drejka is the aggressor.
@Abel Jacobo You really think a man who defended his wife deserved to die? So you don't think Drejka deserved to be in jail at least? I mean, even before this he was going around intimidating people with his weapon (one of which was a pregnant lady). He is a wannabe cop who goes around bosting with his gun to feel superior, but in reality he's just a coward eager to use his gun for any reason whatsoever.
@SpookyActionAtADistance it doesn’t matter. Michael made the choice to kill a man over a god damn push. He should keep his calm, knowing he’s a gun owner, & de-escalate if he had genuine intention of just getting abled people out of a disabled parking spot.
@Miller Time “what if”‘s are meaningless in this case Bc a character in this “what if” situation is dead. Michael was a pussy that saw a black man, & personally didn’t know how to fight, so he hit the unarmed victim w the only weapon he had on him. As the term goes “you don’t bring a gun to a knife fight”.
@Some Dude why does he feel like it’s his responsibility to patrol a handicapped parking spot in the first place??? If he would’ve minded his own business to begin with he wouldn’t have been pushed down. People need to take accountability for things that they start.
@Hypogonadism problem in US is the 450 million guns in circulation, the army 3% of that...there's literally nothing they could do to fix that problem unless they completely ban them for 150 years or however long it would take for them to rust...but that is like banning alcohol, it won't work and cause more problems than it solves...in america, anyway. So imo their situation is hopeless.
@Bullshit Department So true. Australia did something radical. Bought back guns. Wich actually worked for them. But i dont think it will work in America.
@Hypogonadism These people grow up with so little confrontation that feel they can justify carrying a gun and "defend" themselves in the most cowardly manner.
A responsible gun owner dreads the day (if ever) that he has to use it. This guy was looking for an opportunity. Poor child lost his father because of it.
@Boris Johnson definitely. And I can also imagine, if you really feel there is a need for discharge, aiming at someone's chest would probably be your last option, and a warning shot would probably be the most logical next step. So yeah, this guy was out for blood
@Madenique van Wyk I think this guy was wrong to fire. But all safety courses teach you that you aim for center mass (chest and abdomen) as it's the largest target on a person. Also warning shots only really exist in movies, a warning shot can get you arrested for a negligent discharge. The brandishing of a gun is warning enough. You're taught that you only fire when aimed at a legitimate threat, and ensuring no innocents are in the background.
This is the major issue, Drejka was not facing a legitimate threat, he was some idiot who wanted to play badass with a woman trying to mind her business, but when someone his own size appeared, he chose to use lethal force instead of defusing or accepting the fight he started.
It's seems Drejka had training in how to a gun, but not when to use a gun. And that is arguably most important.
As a gun owner and concealed carrier I know the chances of me ever having to draw my firearm is pretty damn slim, but even if that does happen the chances of me actually firing it is far slimmer. The simple fact of knowing a person is armed is enough to deter most people. Hell even in the video you see Mr McLaughlin immediately back away and recoil at the sight of the gun, but that murderer Mr Drejka was out for blood anyway
I agree, yes the guy assaulted him but he litterly took a a few seconds thinking to shoot him or not and he was definitely itching to kill someone and the victim gave him a reason to do so.
As a responsible gun owner myself it sickens me. You should be doing everything possible to diffuse these types of situations. He STARTED a confrontation by starting the argument with her which was the first major problem. After he got shoved and pulled his weapon he knew the dude was no longer a threat and shot anyways hoping he could get away with it. What an asshole.
@socks man thanks, I'm not American so I have no idea what the "just carrying firearms around in the street" protocol is, however I do have to say that in the long run, if I had to weigh up shooting an illegal warning shot, and illegally shooting someone in the chest, I'd probably choose the former. Sorry to Drejka but I'm different 😂
@Superior Intelligence 122 did we both watch the same video, the victim stopped after he pushed the dude. dude could have not shot him and all this shit in the video would have never happened
@Keovey did I SAY it was a good idea? Are you saying it's a BETTER idea to just straight up shoot a man? Oh yeah you are, you think they're all equally guilty. Shooter started the whole fight, and immediately whipped his gun out and shot in a couple of seconds. Nothing you say can defend that.
@Keovey there is literally no one I feel pity for in this story except for the kids. The dude is horrible person, the parents were/are horrible people.
@Madenique van Wyk He didn't start the fight?!?! The guy literally came over and shoved the guy to the ground not knowing what's even going on, not a very responsible dad now is it, not a good role model. I feel sorry for no one here apart from the kids
I came here to say this. I am 17 and a future gun owner. I don't ever ever ever ever ever want to use a gun to hurt anyone. I hate that the chance that I may have to, is above zero.
@Caleb Barker Even brandishing a weapon in a situation where you wouldn’t be otherwise justified to discharge it is enough to get you charged in many places.
@Frog in A bucket yes they do, they give you a sense of invulnerability and ultimate power over others. im not gonna argue if guns are bad, but to say there not mind altering is pretty stupid...
@Ashencloud i can't believe that every person who replies to my warning shot suggestion would gladly defend the guy not making a warning shot, because it's illegal and could lead to an accident, thereby confirming to me that you'd rather shoot someone straight in the chest for pushing you, rather than take your chances with a shot that's not aimed at someone directly. Am i losing my mind? How do these two actions compare? This man went to jail for manslaughter, and you're telling me in no way would there be better consequences if he decided not to aim the bullet at the father's chest???
@Keovey so you think that a shove like that justifies his murder? Okay then, I'd rather not think that anyone has such skewed morality, but I wasn't planning on visiting a coutry with more open gun laws than open mindsets, so thanks for providing me another excellent reason.
Both messed. If the Drieka just walked away and called the police he’d have a very solid case of aggravated assault. Instead he wanted to be a wannabe hero protecting “his store”
@Keovey you literally agree with Batman that you don't feel bad for anyone except the kids, and told me everyone was in the wrong here. The only way someone wouldn't feel remorse over someone else dying, is that you think they deserve it. Over a shove. "nobody said that so don't make assumptions" no bucko it's called extrapolation based on evidence and you were practically saying EXACTLY that. I just put it into more clear wording so that you can see what you're advocating for, and rightly realise that it's a radical stance. Now go over your previous comments and tell me what exactly you were trying to say then 😂
@Madenique van Wyk No, i thin k if your going to take a man to the ground for no reason you should expect something back, now shooting the man was out of order and I never said he was in the right but that dad caused this situation though! No very responsible as a dad...
@Keovey okay, you've stated your case. You don't see how, in this man's mind, a random stranger harrassing your family while you're away could justify a confrontation. We don't know anything about the circumstances, and while yes, I agree that a rational person would probably start with something like "Hey! What's going on here?", I still don't see the point of this reasoning. So what if he was in the wrong? Drejka was a million times more in the wrong, and a person ended up dead because of it. I don't see how sprinkling a bit of victim-blaming onto this case, just for the flavour, changes anything about this case or proves anything other than what we know already. People are human, they make mistakes, nobody ever acts 100% justifiable in a situation, which often leads to it worsening. It doesn't at all take away from what Dejka has done, and in fact I hope everyone you love acts coolheaded in every situation, no matter what happens to them. I really hope so.
@Keovey you're getting a bit unintelligible, so I'm not really sure what to respond to. And as you're also not getting what I'm trying to say, I think we can just end it here then.
@Keovey 😂😂😂😂 oh honey, I could talk to you all day. And seeing as you're so eager to talk back, I'm more than happy to oblige. I just don't know what you want me to say? What exactly is your argument? You turned my "he was in the wrong, but Drejka was more in the wrong, and trying to say that he deserves this in any way sounds like victim-blaming" into "uUHM you're saying that this is not his fault at all?!?" and first off I don't think your line of reasoning is well-supported, and when I point that out to you, you don't have any more of an argument to defend your standpoint, rather you just try and invalidate my argument by reiterating it wrongly. Am I right, or did you actually understand what I'm saying and you're simply choosing to misinterpret it so that you don't have to admit to being biased? And please answer back with something coherent.
@I do a little trolling I was searching for this comment. It was avoidable from both sides. And the shooter was too unstable to responsibly handle a gun IMHO. - I know my view can be a little bit skewed due to the fact, that I have german opinions where guns are not allowed at all.
@Sen Li he don't need to escalated by just pushing him without knowing the situation first, if he just ask him why an what happened this should have not happened, every action have consequences, sory for butchering english
@Mikael B dont talk for me.. not all of the rest of the world agree with u. i want to have the ability to defend myself and my family from harm, people like u think its ur right to stop me from that.. my edc include a knife AND first aid its to handle extreme situations in my everyday life.. if i someday would need my knife for self defence i need it at that time not 20min+ when police maybe come help me.. if i need to use my first aid i need to use it right at that time not 20min+ when the ambulance get there.. but u fine with waiting for someone else to save u... im not.
@Naka Chinjah Nobody portrays the victim as an angel. What you do right now is trying to divert the attention from the murderer to the victim. Also known as victim blaming.
@Khazrak is he not black, he is black , so that is why i'm calling him black dude. im not trying to offended ya'll i just said he ain't no angel. nothing after that.
Yes this man was definitely enjoying every moment of the altercation. I doubt race had anything to do with it, he just wanted to shoot someone, literally anyone.
@408. Cheytac Evaluate the situation and if it escalates and he best violent I'll sort him out But I won't just shove him to the ground straight away that's called ASSAULT.
Seriously. This guy was clearly looking for confrontation considering he'd been arrested for pulling out his firearm in FOUR previous roadrage incidents. And multiple of those, again, being at women with their kids with them!
@Keovey Not saying the dad should've escalated the situation by shoving him, I think that was wrong. The guy was clearly looking for confrontation though. Violent confrontation apparently, considering his gun swinging history. Feel really bad for the mom and kids. I seriously hope the kids were to young to be aware of the situation.
Yeh well it seems theres a hell of a lot more "wish someone woulds" than responsible "i hope i never have to" gun owners. In fact its almost embedded into gun culture and advertisements.
@Madenique van Wyk I agree but things happen so fast and anger probably had a huge part of it I say 10 percent of people would of shot him are egos are way 2 much nowadays.
Yeah to be honest I'm convinced that 90% of all gun owners fantasize about the day they'll finally get the opportunity to legally murder someone. It's so creepy and weird, and tbh, people like that are not much better than the would be robber or whatever.
@I do a little trolling no mate you dont tackle someone to the ground and expect nothing do happen ,I am not saying that the white dude is innocent but in my eyes he was a mad with a gun on on fight or flight mode that's why you should avoid street fights ,you dont know if the persone that you are fighting is sane or not
@Madenique van Wyk The issue with warning shots is that the bullet could hit someone else, you've got no idea where that bullet might end up if it ricochets. Sorry you seem to be getting dogpiled for not knowing why warning shots are seen as a bad idea.
Agreed. The assailant wanted to shoot someone for whatever reason he could find. A gun is something the owner hopes never has to use it other than target practice. The assailant went out that day to see if he could find any possible tiny excuse he could find to shoot someone, anyone. It did not matter who it was. He was going to shoot someone that day.
@Boris Johnson There was likely not even a need to unhoster the weapon. He could have just pointed at it. Micheal is a guy that should have never had a weapon if he was so quick to fire with so little provocation.
@Madenique van Wyk In real life, there's no such thing as aiming for the leg, or a warning shot. Aiming is surprisingly difficult under the best of circumstances. If your wrist flicks up a millimeter, that's a deadly shot. That's why you never ever ever point a weapon at a person unless you want to kill them. Any responsible firearm owner knows that rule. It's deadly serious. Pointing a weapon at a person unintentionally, even with your finger off the trigger and the weapon unloaded, is called "flagging", and you just don't do that. It's so dangerous. A deadly weapon is just that-deadly.
@___Meph___ I agree with you but I'm annoying so I have to tell you that it's "defuse" not "diffuse". Diffusion is in chemistry. Defuse is in social situations.
@Mikael B I'm sorry dude, but as a Marine that makes no sense. So, I'm a responsible gun owner now, but in a few years when I leave the military I suddenly become irresponsible?
@Keovey That's not even the argument. You said the boyfriend started the fight which is false statement. Sure, he shouldn't have pushed the man, but the man shouldn't be harassing people.
Randy Trashcan2021-05-30 00:31:05 (edited 2021-05-30 00:31:25 )
@Madenique van Wyk No. No, no, no. Warning shots are always a bad idea. Illegal, too. You don't warn people with a gun, you shoot people with a gun. Aim center mass so as not to miss and end up striking a bystander. If your goal is not to shoot someone with a gun, you shouldn't be pointing your gun. Guns are a lethal force and are only to be used as such. It's honestly concerning so many people are agreeing with you.
As someone who doesn’t have a father: it could be worse. They will remember their father as a man who died trying to protect their mother and them. Obviously not trying to downplay, but it’s a good way to remember him
@AJ3K killing has always been glorified now days it’s not so wym? When criminals had to fight in the arena for there freedom was having killing glorified
@Madenique van Wyk No, NEVER DO WARNING SHOTS. When you use a gun you aim to kill, not injure, or warn. Warning shots have more of a chance of harming or killing other individuals rather than the one that you are trying to get away from therefore making you the murder.
@I do a little trolling Absolutely true. Poor child. But awful parents.
0 likes
Nba Prince2021-05-30 02:08:03 (edited 2021-05-30 02:08:30 )
@AJ3K it is lol back then everyone and there grandparents use to love to watch it which I think I would’ve to imagine watching groups of people fighting to the death in the arena for there freedom omg would be so cool mb I got totally off topic
@Randy Trashcan ma'am, where are these people who are agreeing with me?? So far I only see 20+ replies about what a bad idea it is. I think, any rational human being would get the idea by now.
@___Meph___ Correction: he started a confrontation with the guy's girlfriend, then the guy himself attacked our lovely peach of a concealed-carry-case.
@Madenique van Wyk You seem to be pretty fond of strawman arguments. I never defended Drejka and never will defend him for anything. Your assumption that I would rather shoot someone then take a warning shot is one formed from a place of ignorance and a ridiculous situation. I must ask why you think that those are the only two options?
In the case of concealed or even open carry there is a set of guidelines that everyone ought to follow. First being not to get yourself into incredibly stupid situations. Michael in his genius actively searched for these situations. The second is to simply walk away or otherwise get out of the situation through nonviolent means. Michael skipped this one. Third being If you absolutely must, then draw your weapon. In the vast majority of confrontations involving a gun this is where they end. The gun never even being fired. And the aggressor leaves. This is where the altercation between Michael and Markeis would have ended, had Michael not been so trigger happy and moved on to number four, where he fired his weapon at Markeis. Markeis was backing away at the moment and the situation was almost totally diffused when Michael fired. In this situation even if Michael had not fired his weapon he still would have possibly been charged with brandishing a firearm, once again because he started it all and had the opportunity to walk away. In these guidelines, the fourth one is to shoot at center mass. Not to shoot a warning shot. This is because if a warning shot scares someone off, they certainly would have just been scared off by the sight of the weapon. And if they aren’t scared off by the sight of the weapon, then they have no regard for their life and it is more than safe to assume that they will do anything to get you.
In conclusion, I think you need to stop arguing about things you know little about. You need to learn and research so you don’t make these half assed arguments. Michael Drejka did not follow the guidelines.
1. Don’t get yourself in bad situations.
2. Get out of a bad situation through nonviolent means.
3. If you must, draw your weapon.
4. If the danger of death or serious bodily harm persists. Fire your weapon.
And I realise these guidelines can be flawed, that's why they are guidelines, sometimes you must draw your gun and fire immediately. But as I said earlier the extreme vast majority of confrontations involving a firearm never result in anyone getting shot.
Source:
https://fee.org/articles/guns-prevent-thousands-of-crimes-every-day-research-show/#:~:text=Guns%20prevent%20an%20estimated%202.5,crimes%20are%20prevented%20using%20firearms.
@tiffany heart that's your right to think that as that's my right to think different cause we live in a free world, i don't want you to think same as me i'm not a fascist.
@Alex Glick I'm not sure what the connection is? I'm just saying that if he hadn't been aggressive towards this man twice his age and attacked him unjustifiably out of surprise he wouldn't have died like an idiot in front of his family.
@Marchkofeeling pushing does not justify killing, it was unnecessary to push him but the guy with the gun was definitely way worse, I don't see how he could be justified
@Jim Havelaar I agree and I'm not saying that, I'm just saying that he is the initiator of the first assault and unlucky he ran into an unstable ... if he had jumped in his car and left he would be safe but he preferred to be the author of violence.
@Marchkofeeling you're supposed to meet force with the same amount of force if you want to prevent yourself from looking like the aggressor vs the defender. Shooting a man taking steps back not moving his hands is uncalled for as much as him shoving him to begin with. Both in the wrong
I was in town a week ago and during rush hour and heard what I was convinced was gunshots and quite a lot of them and I was in a lane I couldn't get put of and do carry a pistol with me often, and was sure I was going to have to engage and come to find, its some moron in a sports car of some sort with am exhaust that sounds like gun shots.
Well I guess don’t assault random because you don’t like what their saying lol you might get shot in the chest but feel free to take your chances, we might get more videos like this.
@Marchkofeeling I would rather even go as far as risking a beating in a public area than waste however many years of life the person doing so lived, alongside of potentially destroying the lives of all those around them. Why cause all that undo suffering, just because I can't take a punch? Last I checked assault is not punishable with the death penalty, so why should someone in the situation have the right to issue it. Especially in a situation like the one depicted where they are in a public location and the guy didn't seem to do anything further besides pushing him.
@Catsquidcat Overlord One punch is often enough to kill someone, especially from behind by surprise BUT to respond you i've said he (shooter) is an unstable and i've never said he (deadman) deserve to die BUT he initiated the assault so he's up to that.
Because America's Law enforces such behaviour. And Donald made it even worse. Gotta wait and see, if Joe can lead towards the first steps of a "solution" to prevent it.
so you can put your hands on someone and get away with it? I guess dude didn't get away with it though , he is dead. Should have kept his hands to himself, tough guy is gone!
@GarxGar it’s actually called harassment, not complaining. 🤷♂️ Good thing you weren’t on the jury, you’d probably have been disqualified for bias and psychopathy
@Leland Bourdages Use your brain just for one time, if he didn't push him down from behind the shooter do not open fire at him self defense have nothing to do with that.
He got what he deserved. Maybe the next aggressor will think twice about assaulting a man twice his age over a parking space they were parked illegally in in the first place.
@Borfis Jort i didnt say that i meant that the whole situtation was over a parking spot. the whole world is a mess i just wish people would stop hurting eachother
@tiffany heart don't argue with them. These people have been radicalized by gun manufacturer and NRA for a very long time. They have normalized the idea of taking away lives over minor things. Like the narrator says: "appeal to extreme". Their world view of themselves is that dangerous minorities are everywhere and they must remain hyper-vigilant, as if they are now in a doomsday.
Ik it was dumb and he shouldn't have pulled a gun on that man, but he was threatened. It turned from a argument, to being shoved to the ground. At that point i agree with him shooting the other guy.
@Kozak isgod Not really. If someone pushed you from behind would you feel threatened. Yes you would, it would activate your fight or flight. Do I think he should've pulled his gun? Yes. Do I think he should've shot him? NO! But you're not a coward for feeling threatened or wanting to defend yourself.
@SticksForChicks I'd say it is scarier only in the sense that the chances of you getting murdered by a serial killer are slim compared to the chances that some stupid vigilante with a gun and a chip on his shoulder will shoot you for running a stop sign.
@Elle Did you not see the attackers posture before he saw the gun. He was going after an old man on the ground so in terms of stand your ground he had every right to protect it. As for harassing the couple. He just asked them to move from the handicapped parking spot as it is illegal and they didn't have the sticker. If a man gets to mad you just simply asked his wife to move out if the handicap spot and attack an old man, I stick by what he said. He deserved it.
@tiffany heart I've taking a few talibans life's during my few tours. I sleep like a baby. I also would sleep just fine if someone broke I to my house with my wife and kid and I terminated the threat.l which would definitely happen because I sleep with an AR pistol, specifically a MK18 mod 1 with a suppressor (yes its registered and legal with the ATF) by my bed, wifes keep her glock 43 and I never travel without my glock 23 chambered in .40 with a + 5 baseplate. That's just my defensive guns. That's not even my safe lol.
@tiffany heart some people aren't meant for it. I do want to speak on the case though. The guy backed up once he saw the gun and me personally wouldn't have shot, just retreated to a defensive position to my vehicle and called the cops since the threat seemed to be over.
@Sooraj The majority of crime is done in places where guns are almost impossible to get and bought illegally and done by a certain minority lol Come. And. Take. Them.
@Alex Glick have you done any research? You are 10x more likely to be killed as a white man feom the opposite race. Good God just go to government domains and you'll get all the real info you need. Again, feelings do not equal facts.
@StacheOperator We got a certified badass over here. Your country still has a much higher crime rate than comparable first-world countries. I wonder why 🤔
@Shannon Hanley Here's another one from the same website. The crime index of the USA is 47.7. The crime index of comparable first-world countries are as follows; Canada: 40.64, Australia: 41.61, New Zealand: 42.19, UK: 44.54, France: 47.37, Germany: 35.14, South Korea: 27.33, Japan: 21.67.
@Xero Exactly. Even if we're only going by the enthnocentric "first-world" data moniker, and if we're going for comparable in terms of population/city distribution, then Sweden, France, Ireland, Belgium, Palestine, UK, Italy, and India are all within three points of the US. I really don't believe most people would consider that "much higher."
@Shannon Hanley Are Palestine and India really comparable countries to the US? You still skipped Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada, Japan, Germany etc.
@Xero India more so than New Zealand, a tiny, isolated, sparsely-populated island? Yes. I'd say so. Anyway, the reason I chose those countries and "skipped" others was simply to address your statement that US has a much higher crime rate than comparable first-world countries. By which, I'd assume you meant all comparable first-world counties. Which is patently untrue.
@GarxGar Firstly, Drejka was 47 at this time. Far from an "old dude." Plus he doesn't even have grey hair or anything else in the video that would make him look old at a glance. So I don't know where you got the impression that he was just some frail old guy, shouting at the clouds and could not have been perceived as a threat to anyone.
Just as you justify Drejka shooting based on feeling threatened by an "aggressive macho dickhead", consider that the man who was shot was in the store during the argument. He, just like the rest of the customers, didn't know that it was "just about parking." When he goes outside & sees that the male & female voice arguing is his wife and a man who has come near her car, where their children are sitting? By your own logic, he likely felt that he needed to defend his family. So he pushed the guy (clearly not a tackle, as shown on video). Apply your analysis consistently. What should the victim have done to defend his wife & kids against an overly-aggressive man who has just approached their car?
Edit: I just realized he even says his age in this video! He was actually 48 (1 year off from what wikipedia said). Not an "old man." People don't crumble into dust after age 30, you know. Also, Drejka had 4 previous cases of pulling guns on people in road incidents, 2 of which were women? And you call the guy he killed an "aggressive macho dickhead"? Either you are didn't watch the video, or you are so blinded by bias that you really shouldn't even be commenting.
@Marchkofeeling Drejka was 47. He was not an old man and he doesn't even look like one. He has perfectly brown hair & no saggy skin or anything. The only thing that might look old about him is his posture. But he was not old & other than being a bit hunched, he doesn't look old either.
He also wasn't yelling at the person who pushed him, he was yelling at the wife of that guy. Imagine walking out of the store & seeing that some random man has approached your car where your kids are sitting and is arguing with your wife? Maybe he thought that his wife was in danger & made a snap choice?
@jarry Dee Oh, you people are so blatantly biased. If you came out of a store & saw that some random man had approached your car with your children in it and was arguing with your wife... how would you react?
That's not about being a "tough guy." Just like you can claim that Drejka had to respond to someone being a "tough guy", so did McGlockton. You don't get to play cop-wannabe and expect people to treat you the same as someone with actual authority.
And no, you can't physically attack someone and get away with it. That's what the legal system is for. If you were assaulted, then get the person arrested. A gun is not a tool of retribution or justice. That's the problem with these types. A gun is a last resort. That man knew that his life wasn't in danger, as he clearly showed in his interrogation.
@jarry Dee …shooter should have gone about minding his own business that day. In the eyes of the law and his peers, he got 20 years for pulling and a gun for being “pushed”. In his own words he had never had a physical fight but willingly use a gun and take the life of another in place of his fists - gutless!
@Tavat i'm not racist fact are fact and not telling the truth about some people just because they aren't white is the true racism and made by you what about farmer advantage if they are black? what about the mayor of New York not wanting to meet white journalists? all years long since b.lm bullshit etc etc etc your progressive and globalist way of thinking is the new fascism. and let me tell you by advance this post will be deleted soon cause it's telling the truth and i live in a free world if i want to speak i speak, period (5 posts deleted before)
@GarxGar if the old dude had any sense he wouldn't place himself into this situation. did you miss the part of the video where he was accused of threatening other drivers with his gun? he was the instigator and he only did it because he was packing. i have no sympathy for him
Yes illegally park somewhere then your boyfriend illegally attacks him. He shouldn't of shot but def should of pulled out gun or the black dude would of killed him
@Tavat actually i've said "Globalism is the new fascism" disguise the thought and distort the words without being able to capture the nuances and at the same time to call me an idiot, thank you for this nice piece of laughter.
well obviously it does since 99.8 % of victims die to such cases and not serial killers lol. But just imagine having gun laws, no one dies to stupid people :O Glad to not have this problem here were worst case scenario is a pocket knife.
100%, you understand the serial killer's purpose, and understand who they are immediately. It's the one's that are outlandish and irrational with a deadly weapon that are worse, it could be LITERALLY anyone
@Marchkofeeling That "old guy" was yelling at his wife. So no, no one would expect him to ignore that and "just drive." Maybe if someone is yelling at your loved ones you just walk away but that's not what others would do as well. Calling him stupid because he acted on someone he thought was a threat to his wife is really weird tbh
@tiffany heart yes obviously. The guy isn’t gonna shoot you if you did nothing.If you aren’t a savage and keep your hands to yourself you don’t got much to worry about😂. But again I don’t condone what he did, but the other dude was in the wrong too
There was a case in my country where a young man used a "boga", it's like a gun but it only make noise and usually used during New Year, and a cop and his daughter walk up to them. They argued and the cop decided that he will take the young man to prison. The young man's mom which is very old then cling to his son and started to defend her child by trying to reason with the cop. The cop's daughter brags to the woman that her dad is a policeman as if to tell that her dad has the right to take the young man so the woman should just let go. Obviously, the woman just held her son and said she doesn't care about the cop's status. The cop cursed at the woman and screamed "Do you want me to finish you off right now?!" with that he took a shot to the woman then to the son. The two dropped and the people around them that was unable to help cried and begged the cop to stop. What's horrid is that the cop and his daughter doesn't seem affected by what just happened, they walked away as if nothing happened. It was all caught on camera and a lot of people just witnessed a murder in cold blood. I wouldn't even want to think about if he killed people before catching him in action, he has no remorse that it may be possible. "Boga" may have been banned because it had a lot of self-injury cases but that issue was completely thrown as the cop clearly just wanted to show off his position and that he has a gun.
@Will Maud No, if you've been in a heated conversation before you'd know they walked up and pushed each other. That's fine tho I don't believe you have that much outside experience.
@Mikoto Suoh Remind me, if Trump's America was so bad for black people, why did police shootings against unarmed black men go down every single year he was in office? Why is black on white crime up?
@Cole Marshall Do you have any stats for that? With how many people get murdered by serial killers versus to how many people are killed by people like that?
And as you said, a physical attack initiated it. He didn't just say the wrong thing to the wrong person. Are there people who will kill you just because you said the wrong thing? Sure, but again, they're rare just like serial killers.
And serial killers are rare but one serial killer could kill a bunch of people since he's trying not to get caught, whereas an idiot like that will probably get caught and put behind bars after his first and only murder since he will do it in front of everyone at the heat of the moment without having pre-planned the hell out of it first.
@tiffany heart He wasn't saying any of that at all. I wouldn't bring race into it for no reason. He's saying that it's wrong to come out of nowhere and push someone like the victim did. Yeah; the victim didn't deserve to die for it- but the victim definitely escalated things by choosing to push him rather than telling him to leave or just move his car(because they WERE parked in the wrong spot).
Micheal had been in several altercations before. Not just against people of colour. He was waiting for an excuse to use his weapon; and he thought the push justified it. Doesn't make it right, but the victim was acting inappropriately too.
You can clearly see in the footage that came up cockily(hands on hips), pushed him, and then seemed to go in for more; only backing up when the gun came out.
You can also CLEARLY see the bystander at the door(who witnessed the push) going in to stop the victim before the Assailant pulled the gun.
If not for Michael shooting his gun; the one that would've gotten arrested would've been the victim; Markeis.
he was right to pull it he got blindsided but he shoulda kept his finger off the trigger long enough to realize the dude was turning away not stepping toward him
I'm a legal concealed carrier, & this guy & guys with his attitude (people who feel like they need to confront others & enforce the law while not carrying a badge) should NOT be carrying a weapon. Of any kind. He was either taught poorly by his instructor, or misunderstood what personal defense is. My instructor put it this way: when you're carrying, you need to be Zen. Nothing bothers you. You avoid confrontation, you don't SEEK it out like this guy did. You don't get into little pissing contests or ego fights, you don't even flip some D-bag the bird after he cuts you off on the freeway. You need to apologize, you need to de-escalate. You need to do everything in your power to NOT draw your weapon. It's a huge responsibility. That being said, don't ever talk to cops without a lawyer.
Yeah Philip I can appreciate that. The definitely seems like the correct behaviour you should follow when legally carrying a weapon. I just find it hard to believe that a large majority of gun owners are even capable of such a mindset and behaviour.
You I trust with this kind of thing. It's just the majority of people I don't.
I carried too, I got into a scuffle with a guy and I never drew my XD 40, I felt no need to un holster it, the guy was at Walmart and he started beating his wife like she was a man, no one wanted to step, just record it, I stepped in and he got physical with me, I may have been carrying but I can fight too, I probably would've got my ass kicked but I realized this guy can't fight, he just knows how to hit women, blah blah blah i put him down and cops seen the surveillance and took him to jail like the loser he is!. Some carriers are bullies and just look for trouble and try to be dominant like this guy in the vid, pppffftttt pathetic! R.I.P to the man.
I was just watching Cart Narcs and one dude announced he had a concealed carry and could pull it, all because he was asked to return his cart at the supermarket. He needs to read this message
And that is why you can't give everyone blanket permission to carry a weapon. You'll never know how a gun carrier will behave in any situation, especially a stressful one.
I agree WHOLEHEARTEDLY! I was taught how to use my fire arm from a cop and the one thing I learned is exactly what you said. But you learn all that stuff in martial arts as well. I am also trained in muay thai, but I dont go looking for a fight I avoid them. you have to be calm to assess the situation before you use it of any force that can cause harm, Cause if you use it it's something you cannot take back.
Heck, any self defense teacher worth his salt should teach that lesson. I learned that in hand to hand. Avoid the confrontation. And when it rises, talk it back down. There is valor found even in fleeing...
And the biggest lesson he taught me was to do as little damage as I can when physical altercation arises. Aim not for the head, when you can knock out a leg.
I am also a responsible gun owner and behave accordingly. Often people’s egos, cause them to be confrontational. Someone who flips the bird in traffic or loses control by screaming and shouting is someone I avoid. Being taught to immediately recognize all possible conclusions, I avoid putting myself in precarious positions. Although I am willing to defend my life, I avoid these situations. Someone willing to argue over a parking spot is looking for a fight that I won’t give them.
*No* instructor would ever think that this guy's actions were justified. Normally, CCW instructors are so paranoid for getting sued that they will basically tell you never to shoot someone in self-defense. I shit you not, in my first CCW class a female asked if it was OK to shoot a man about to rape her. He told her that she would have to wait until he was actually in the act of penetrating her before she could shoot.
@Xanthia Fantom That person doesn't have a fragile ego! He thought and probably still thinks that he stands way above anyone that isn't white and can kill them just like that.
@Daniel Hristov or, or, and hear me out, mace/pepper spray, or a Tazer. Non-lethal deterrants that are just as effective at stopping a threat as a gun would be.
Yeah some people aren't affected by tazers or mace, but same goes for bullets. If someone's insane enough, they'll take shots and keep attacking. At which point you need to improvize. Guns are just unnecessary, and having mace or a tazer instead would save many lives.
Guns are stupid, and that's just a fact. Only people who should be armed at all are law enforcement and the military.
My guess would be that carrying a gun in public means they CANT WAIT to pull it out or brandish it in some manner. I bet 90% of the conceal/carry guys are basically thinking "I wish a mfer WOULD".
Then maybe we should do something at a higher level to encourage people not to take up a handicap parking space when they don't need it - by the time the police were notified, they'd have been gone and then no one would even fucking care, except maybe a handicapped person who needed that spot in the meantime ...
@TazzyTheDerg there are many people in the police and military that are wholly unprepared to carry a gun. Also, a mace or a taser are perfectly fine option in many cases, but in one vs. many situation they can cost you your life by escalating the situation without serving as a sufficient deterrent. Guns are useful but the gun control and the requirement for qualities of the carrier should be much more strict than they are otherwise their benefit is vastly overweighed by the harm they will cause.
@TazzyTheDerg I would have to disagree I think every state and every place should test someone's mental state and of they're able to keep a level head in these situations. People have the right to defend and protect themselves in extreme circumstances yes we should have more control on who has a gun cause not everyone should own one. But yeah we should have the right to project ourselves
psh, you may have even insinuated controlling who has guns, so shove it and move on 😂 this is America, this is the American Dream he’s living. What a fantastic country.
100% agree. He pulled out his gun for something that could have been solved just by walking away. Guns and open carry are supposed to be used for emergency situations where all other options are being exhausted and the other person is within a hair's breath of doing something awful to you.
The woman’s face when the defense attorney said “this man is was the true victim” fully encapsulated my reaction to this whole video. The audacity of this man is ridiculous
Well in a sense, he was the one who initially got attacked. Just because you’re arguing with someone doesn’t mean you get to attack them. So up until he pulled the gun and shot someone who clearly yielded to him, he was the victim.
@Michael he didn't escalate the fight. The black man did it by aggressively pushing him to the ground, potentially making him hit his head on the ground.
Him pulling out his gun was to a degree justified, but everything after that showed that he is just a guilty murderer. The right thing to do would be to not immediatly kill a man like a dumbass, but to go away and report the assault to the authorities
The black guy was also wrong. Without even enquiring for a second about what's happening, he just push the man to the ground within one second just because the man was arguing with his wife. If he didn't pull out his gun, who knows what's gonna happen next. The audacity of this comment just so you don't look racist is more baffling.
@Miriam Bamford i never said he was right? But there was no need for him to be shot. “Commenting this as to not seem racist” no im just baffled that the attorney would say this, chill out
@Jack Eternus I've seen attorneys justify their job by saying "Its better to let 10 criminals free than imprison a civilian"
I'm not familiar with the trial you referenced (Jodi Arias), and while I don't like attorneys twisting the truth like that, I do agree with this quote, 1000 percent. The actual quote is “It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.” I think the quote is more meant to highlight flaws with the justice system with regard to how much of an injustice it is that anyone should ever be wrongly incarcerated, rather than to let criminals off the hook.
@Flzrian same with rape victims. one of the reasons I never came forward legally was I didn’t think I could mentally handle a lawyer trying to defame my character
@Michael mike deserves to be in prison. But the dude assaulted him rather than conduct verbal argument first to resolve the matter. Mike and the woman had ample space and inside a vehicle so the man pushed Mike out of pure over reaction. Woman could have also just moved the car since the lot was empty but then we can justify a handicapped person could park next to them, but she could also just move the vehicle, should mike keep making an issue, dial 911. Out of personally dealing with folks who think their made up neighborhood watch is a federal funded regime, I rather just keep space, speak out my discomfort and for them to cease the issue, and if it doesn’t occur I call the police and make sure I’m recording the freak out, Mike’s biggest issue is he really wanted to live out his fantasy and you see it though his interrogation he’s happy to retell the moments
@Dankey Kang Yep, your right. The victim shouldn't have pushed him like that. He should've remained calm and figured out what was the deal. You can't get violent and assault someone for no good, i.e., legal reason, especially when you have a family with you. The only time anyone should put their hands on someone, let alone get violent, is when there is a real and immediate danger. It's the same with this guy because it was clear to him and everyone else that he was in no immediate danger. Just really disappointing, and bad decisions were made by all involved.
@Miriam Bamford did you even watch the video? He could've easily pulled out his gun and the guy who pushed him wouldn't have kept going. The video shows that very clearly.
Well who tf do you think you are to park in a handicap spot without being handicapped and then assault another person that points IT out?
Most people would have done the same. Most people that want to live in a civilized country at least. Of course pulling out the gun was the big error from the other guy. But both did their part to get to this outcome that nobody wanted.
@The Great Pumpkin and u get get pushed to the ground without shooting someone through the heart!!! If he had pulled the gun… COOL! We all agree. If mclogton had advanced at that point, COOL! but he didn’t!!! I don’t think dreka is a DUNN level racist idiot, but, he is a fake military/police guy, and, as a combat veteran(Iraq) u can’t understand how much guys like that gross me out. Vets don’t deserve any more respect that any person… but, a guy like this clearly thinks we do… guess what… he shoulda joined in that case. They were literally giving away multiple thousands of dollars as a signing bonus… to sign up. The army(which I joined) and the marines were desperately short of volunteers in 2003/04. Why didn’t he just sign up?
I’m not defending Drejka but Will not defend his victim, because he should keep his hands to himself. Especially when you are much younger and stronger. You don’t know if the other guy have a weapon. Hurting man’s pride can result in death. In Chicago people die over words every day.
@Dankey Kang Drejka instigated and escalated the whole issue... He was screaming at a woman but the second he was confronted by a man he had to pull a gun out.
@The Great Pumpkin "You can deal with someone talking to your wife without putting your hands on them." He wasn't "talking" to her. He was yelling and swearing at her. To the point where other customers, both coming OUT of the store and going in ALL stopped to watch and listen. If he had been speaking in a calm, polite manner I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have paid the least bit of attention. And he didn't need to touch the car. He had her trapped by standing blocking the door and he was speaking in a threatening manner which is part of the reason why he was convicted. Because he instigated the entire incident. He is NOT the parking lot police. It's not his property so he had no right to walk over and say ANYTHING. In doing so he became the aggressor.
@Marvin Salmeron "Mike’s biggest issue is he really wanted to live out his fantasy and you see it though his interrogation he’s happy to retell the moments" This is a key element of Drejka's character that was a focal point of the trial. He had a history of instigating these sort of incidents. Something like this was bound to happen with him one day. He was continually looking for trouble rather than minding his own business and enjoying his retirement peacefully.
@Miriam Bamford "If he didn't pull out his gun, who knows what's gonna happen next." Do you... at any time... see any continuation of aggressive action on the part of McGlockton, after the initial push? "Stopping the threat" was achieved by pulling out the gun. What is supposed to be the goal? Stopping
the threat or ending any possibility of a threat. You don't seem to take into account that "the fear" he was under is automatically reversed by the fact that he has a gun and McGlockton doesn't. Is this whole thing as simple as "you pushed me"... "I feel threatened"...."now I can kill you"?
Once Mr. McGlockton shoved Mr. Drejka down... and the Mr. Drejka subsequently removed his gun.... the gun itself was obviously a deterrent to any further escalation of the incident ... because Mr. McGlockton backed up at the point the gun was withdrawn. The drawn gun and Mr. McGlockton backing up was supposed to end this situation. It is IMPOSSIBLE to make the case that a man, who is backing up at the sight of a gun, is a threat to the person with the gun. The gun should have served as the "end-all" to the situation.
@Herbert West I agree he's the original instigator, and that he's not the parking lot police. I already said this, in fact. Still, generally, you don't run up and shove someone or put your hands on someone at all who hasn't put their hands on you first. That's just escalating the situation.
@G. Marie It's just not wise to escalate. You saw what happened here. One idiot pushed another idiot. and that idiot got shot by the idiot who overreacted just as much. You can't let your emotions overtake you like that. You're not an animal.
@G. Marie You can defend without immediately resorting to force, depending on the threat. You have to use reason a little bit too. Force may be warranted, but not as the only go-to response for literally any provocation. That's just being ruled by short-sightedness. But actually, even most wild animals avoid physical conflict because they know injuries are costly and could lead to infections, which can lead to death. So this is actually even less wise than that. And in this case, it cost him his life. EDIT: except, when defending their infants, but then animals are just acting purely on instinct and it could cause them to sacrifice themselves. Giving up your life for your child just leaves them with one less parent. Not very smart imo.
@G. Marie Him defending his family caused his family to not have him in the picture any longer. Was that a wise decision? It wasn't a decision at all, but a brute instinct that should have been tempered.
I'll never forget the lesson an uncle taught me. We were driving and some a-hole cut him off or did something crazy, and I was like "Why don't you give him a honk?" My uncle looked at me like I was a damn fool, and told me that we have no idea who that person is, what they have on them (E.g. a gun) and that it just isn't worth it. That person was in the wrong, but running up on them at a stop light would have been irrational and from a legal perspective could have gotten my uncle in trouble.
@The Great Pumpkin in this case he couldn’t have done anything other than use force. idk if you saw the video, but michael was agitated and i have no doubt in my mind he would’ve pulled the gun on that woman and her kids, just like he had on another woman w her kids.
@G. Marie Well, he did use force but it still cost him his life. Maybe if McGlockton had himself been armed, he could have been first to draw, but only to deter Drejka. So that wouldn't have been a use of force, but the threat of it, towards a defensive end. On the other hand, you're still just speculating b/c even if Drejka was worked up you don't know what he was actually going to do. In that moment he was just using words.
I hate being put in the position of explaining this because I don't think what Drejka did was right, but speaking in general you don't just shove someone immediately even if they are yelling at someone else. Unless they are expressing actual explicit threats, which IDK if Drejka was doing at that moment. It was obviously just a wannabe rent-a-cop ranting, although McGlockton couldn't even have known that much. That's basically my problem with his actions, is that he didn't actually know anything and he just acted out of impulse.
@The Great Pumpkin babes. i think you’re ignoring the point that michael has been doing this alot. he starts arguments just so he can flaunt and show his gun. for gods sake, he did it towards a woman with her kids! he was definitely just waiting for someone to fight back, so he could shoot. he was a wannabe police officer. and i dont have a doubt in my mind, he would have pulled his gun out on that mother with her kid.
@The Great Pumpkin and no, as i’ve already said it wasnt impulse it was instinct. if someone is yelling and swearing at my wife, i would push them too because who the hell does he think he is?
@G. Marie Yes, *WE* know Drejka's history NOW, because we've read up on it. But McGlockton didn't. For all he knew it was just some random dude shouting at his wife. I'm just saying, there's steps before violence, in general. Otherwise, you are legally viewed as the initial aggressor.
So if anyone is wondering, this guy got sentenced to 20 years and at the beginning of this year he was attacked by another inmate resulting in a head injury with 5 stitches. Wonder if he still thinks he made the right choice that day?
Definitely shouldn't have shot the guy after he backed away, big mistake. Also, Markeis definitely should not have come up and shoved him to the ground. Bigger mistake.
@Disgusting he could have just stayed on the ground and played the victim, played up some injuries, then the fact that he was being a jerk in the first place would have been forgotten. Everyone would have moved on, a little pissed off but still alive and out of jail
Nobody made a good decision that day. Dead guy shouldn't have put hands on someone. Dead guy was shot wrongfully as a result. Wife or baby-mama or whatever she is made the mistake of taking a handicap space. The kids didn't have any choice but hopefully they end up better than their stupid parents.
@john papple the chain reaction of events really could have been stopped. This is something everyone needs to keep in their minds as they go about their day. Being courteous goes a long way to make positive changes
@Disgusting shoving a person to the ground is very different from shooting one. I can't comprehend how you can compare those two. Yeah both would hurt and are wrong, but one is a LOT WORSE than the other. And you're just saying "yeah its bad he shot the person, but the other guy shouldnt have shoved him in the 1st place."
@john papple i agree, chain reaction. Bad behavior create bad things. Some people don't know your point, they just focus on the shooting and the murderer.
@godspeeding Defending? He attacked him from behind. It's on video. "OOGA BOOGA! MY WOMAN! LEAVE ME WOMAN ALONE! OOGA BOOGA!" News flash. It's not an attack to speak to someone. Normal people don't just go around shoving people for speaking to someone they know.
@john papple While I agree with much of what you said theres one problem. The aggressor in this matter was the guy with the gun from beginning to end. Not only did he park ILLEGALLY to yell at someone who parked illegally, but he then aggressively confronted and started yelling at her. Here lies the problem he should of just parked and went into the store. He isn't a cop, he isn't a parking authority, so he has no right to chastise someone who is parking illegally. Especially since he himself parked illegally. As with the man coming out of the store; all he saw was a white man screaming, not talking, to his significant other. I would of walked up to him and got into his face in order to protect my wife and loved ones. The push might have been over board but he was more in the right than you think.
You have the perspective of someome who hasn't had someone do what he did to a love one. So you dont know how you would react. It's easy to take a high ground and say what you say when you are so detached from this situation. You have the ability to look at the situation without emotion attached and with absolute logic. That doesn't apply to this situation at all.
@john papple Worse, baby-mama waited till she saw "her man" sneaking up to get out of the car and in his face to make herself appear in need of defense to her man. Baby-momma was so happy to see Drejka knocked down, but she got her man killed.
Just goes to show to mind your own business. Yes, people who illegally park are douchebags. Yes, people who are arguing with your significant other should make you angry. But it’s better to de-escalate the situation and swallow your pride for a minute to just be able to walk away. You’ll always be grateful when you think about what COULD have happened if you reacted the wrong way.
@john papple where are you getting your information from? Do we know for a fact that both the victim and his partner were fully able-bodied? Do you know what the victim’s partner said to warrant you referring to her as “dumb.” Do you know what was said between the two parties for the victim to push the perpetrator to the ground?
You’ve made so many assertions based on a footage without audio that it is astounding!
@Just CHI-CHI This little clip was actually a pretty big story. I, for one, followed it because it had a lot to do with the gun world and stand your ground laws. They were yelling at each other and the shooting victim pushed the shooter. At that point, he is the primary aggressor even if he or his wife were disabled. Words are not a reason for violence. It’s a god damned shame he was killed but his actions lead to the shooting. It’s called a “but for” in legal jargon
@Just CHI-CHI She didn't have a handicap pass. She had no right to be there. This all started because she was parked illegally. Of course that's a very minor thing compared to the rest, but yes this could have been avoided at so many different points. The shooter is guilty, but don't get your feelings in a twist because a commenter pointed out she also had done wrong.
@Just CHI-CHI I am calm and I read your comment. No need to further speculate and give her more benefits of a doubt. Parking in a handicap spot doesn't make her evil, just inconsiderate and selfish. But even in the case that she or her boyfriend is disabled despite moving around just fine to the store which tells me other parking spots would have been fine, she didn't have any plates or signs and the confrontation started there. It doesn't cost you anything to be decent and as a result you can better avoid these confrontations. I am not victim blaming, but I do think you shouldn't take away from a self-teaching moment regardless of whose side you take.
@Otoshi God that’s the thing, I am not taking a side. I feel sympathetic for the victims, but that is a very logical and normal response to the situation.
First, there are different forms of disabilities. Being able to walk to the store does not completely erase the fact that anyone of them could still suffer from a disability
Second, I recognize that tragedy still happens to those who make all the right decisions and avoid confrontations. The point that the shooting would have been avoided is moot for this reason. Also, according to the video and the murderer’s interrogation, he is an aggressor and carries around a weapon to intimidate people.
I can recognize this murder as an unfortunate event with several people being at the wrong place at the wrong time, regardless of whether their individual choices led them to where they are. And most importantly - while I recognize that you’re not doing this - I strongly believe people should reserve morally judging the victims based on this silent clip. We’re all lacking context. We can avoid victim blaming by logically observing the altercation for what it was - an unfortunate misunderstanding that resulted in murder. We actually know more about the murderer from his interrogation and I can safely say he seems to live a sad life
@Just CHI-CHI They could suffer a disability. But not one warranting that parking space. Usually that parking spot is reserved for ramp access considering that the other spots are about equal distance to the door way anyways. Not really an excuse for that. No need to dig for one either. You can remain sympathetic for the victims and still be unbiased. It's obvious the murderer just looks for confrontations and if not this family it could have easily happened to another. It seems like this was just something waiting to happen. But any action you can take to minimize these kinds of unnecessary confrontations is still a good thing. In the comment section of YouTube that's something I will maintain for others. Of course if I were talking with the family I wouldn't feel the need to mention anything about that. They are well aware I am sure of the chain of events that occurred and how they could have done things differently. But no excuses need to be made. We should not attack the victims, but we should still caution against careless behavior.
@Otoshi God ok. While I disagree with you, I really don’t vehemently disagree. You seem rational and level-headed enough. My comment was really in response to the person who said this: “wife or baby-mama or whatever she is made the mistake of taking a handicap space” If that comment isn’t loaded with a whole lot of stereotyping, insults, and condescending judgements about the victim’s character, then I don’t know what is. Of course the poster said more but I don’t care to copy the rest.
I hear you. I don’t agree but I don’t also disagree entirely.
@john papple Just because someone makes the dumb decision to park in a handicap space, it shouldn’t lead to someone getting shot and/or killed. This guy was looking for trouble.And, Even if someone gets shoved to the ground by a non-armed person, it should not lead to someone getting shot and/or killed, it’s insane.
1 like
john papple2020-11-28 20:37:59 (edited 2020-11-28 20:38:15 )
@Karolin It shouldn't escalate. That's my point. How did it start? Blame the guy who cares about his community enough to call someone out who is inconsiderate about the needs of disabled people? Or blame the guy who attacks another man from behind like some kind of idiot? If talking to someone is where it escalated, then I guess I'm lucky as hell that I've never been shot. It couldn't have anything to do with my keeping my hands to myself and being reasonable. You say "looking for trouble". Seemed like the dead black guy had no problem starting trouble. I wonder if he thought about how bad of an idea shoving him was. We'll never know if he learned. Hopefully his kids learned to mind their manners and keep their hands to themselves. That's the only way that his death could have any meaning.
@G Victor like you wouldnt do the same? If someone is talking down to one of your loved ones, you're not gonna do anything? Maybe not get physical but you would approach.
This dude is an UBER snitch.. He snitching on people he don't even know on a citation level offense. I bet this dude is in PC snitching on EVERYONE to try to be buddy buddy with the CO's. "Excuse me officer! Officer! I have some very important Intel on the Surenos bringing in 2 oz of black tar. That's Heroin apparently.."
@elly you can say that everyone made a mistake while also realizing that one stupid mistake leads to another. He should never have shot him and being pushed to the ground doesnt warrant being killed, but to only fault one person for this entire situation is also dumb...clearly no one is saying that killing someone is fine. everyone needs to use their big boy brains and realize everyone fucked up. the guy who fucked up the most was the guy who committed, in my opinion, first degree manslaughter. actions have consequences this is the real world
@Amara M yes. That’s exactly the point. In most countries it is forbidden to even carry a small screwdriver without a good reason.
People do not seem to understand that guns are not used for defense at all. Look it up. People who have a gun or a knife are very likely to use it for what they think is justified but is not at all.
@Amara M I agree. More than one person made a mistake that night, and as you pointed out, there is a huge difference in the degree of the mistake one person commited versus the other. To compare those actions as if they were on the same level seemed wrong to me. The commenter i was replying to seemed to think that shoving a person to the ground is bigger of a deal than shooting and killing an unarmed man. Or even vice versa: that murdering a person is just a minor offense comparable to pushing the person to the ground. I thought that kind of mindset quite disturbing.
@Nathan van Dalen Wait what?? I was being sarcastic. Guns are used defensively 2.5 million times a year. vs around 50k gun deaths, half of those are suicides, the other 40 percent are gang violence, and they often use illegal firearms...I did look it up...you look up the FBI stats lol
@SuperAussieOi that's not my point but ok 😅 regardless if you make things illegal or not people will find a way to use them incorrectly. In America we have our second Amendent rights. Guns are used in self defense 2.5 million times per year vs 50k gun deaths per year. again half of those are suicides and most of the rest are gang violence (illegal weapons). And semi auto pistols account for the vast majority of gun violence. Very rarely are rifles or "assault rifles" (as some people like to incorrectly label them) used to kill people.
@Disgusting How was that the bigger mistake? The other guy literally killed him. If he couldn't take an ass whooping he should've just left that family alone tf. They were minding their business.
@elly Escalating a verbal confrontation into a physical one is the greater mistake. You can't die by yelling back and forth. But when it's physical, you can die. Even without weapons involved.
Yall got excuses for everything. Trayvon was walking doen the street and got shot and ysll made excuses for the white man who shot him too. Let the roles have been reversed though 😒
@Johanna Patlan You mean apart from the women who took up a disabled space when her and her man and kids were not, and he should not have just pushed the man over No Fault,really
@Keith Lillis I read he has threatened ppl with his gun before, and even pointed his gun during a road rage incident, and I think it said he even shot, just to scare someone tho. That man was def looking to use that gun. Have you watched the Michael Dunn case? Same sort of outcome. That guy is the biggest prick I ever saw.
@elly Well it is a bigger mistake because he triggered an stramger that might react overboard,as it happened in this case. Smarter approach would be to ask what's the problem and yield to the request to move the car as the idiot with the gun was correct in his assertion in the first pkace.
@john papple How about you get off the comments and go shout at a woman and some children since apparently you find that totally ok. Don’t come crying to me when the husband shows up, I tried telling you.
@Dobby From Harry Potter I didn't hear any shouting. I don't shout at people. I don't know what you mean by that. Nice strawman. Keep on track if you want to disagree with me civilly. Don't just make stuff up and put words in my mouth. I won't have any problem with anybody because I don't start problems. If problems come up, I know how to solve them. No need to worry about my safety. Sorry you're so upset about some dead guy you never knew. You should think about why it's causing you to behave so irrationally. It's pretty weird.
@Dobby From Harry Potter Also, that's fascinating that so many of your friends put themselves in dumb situations. I hope you learn to cope with your personal problems. You seem to be harboring a lot of anger. Were you raised by a single mother? I ask because you act much like a woman. Calm down a bit. Anger just makes you tired and confused.
@Dobby From Harry Potter Maybe take up a hobby to occupy yourself. Use that energy for something productive. You're poisoning yourself by letting the anger take control. Men don't act this way. I hope you start to feel better :)
@Dobby From Harry Potter Also I only asked questions. I don't assume much but you're pretty blatant so you seem pretty familiar. I know people like you. You seem to be talking to me as if you're talking to the shooter from the video. I really couldn't care less about either of them. I only joined the discussion here and now you're throwing a fit. Think about that. Again, I hope you feel better.
@john papple The way you talk about the shooter vs the dead father is really telling of your morals. Hope you unlearn all that ugliness before you hurt someone.
@Ed Zamper I agree that it is smarter to try solving problems through discussion instead of resorting to violence right away. Though, can you imagine if one day you go towards your car, and an adult man is right outside it, having a heated argument with your wife while your young son/daughter is also there nearby... I think the dad's impulse when he tried to shove away the dude is coming from the instinct of protecting his family and not just pure dumb aggression.
So I still would not equate shoving someone to the ground with shooting someone multiple times, then playing the victim afterwards.
@Ed Zamper also I'm kinda curious if you would actually do that... Let an annoying dude shout at your wife/mother/daughter over parking space, keep your peace, and do his bidding without context of iis he carrying a gun or not.
If you actually would do it for fear that a random guy carries a gun, i think there could be some problems there in itself. Maybe societies and parking spaces should be safer than that. Just my thoughts
@elly Well, do not confuse prudence with cowardice. You never know with people out there what are their true intentions. You certainly should not push anyone like that because you don't have context on what was happening, and still the guy knew he was right even though he was being a moron. You must approach and try to be reasonable. If the guy keeps at it, best course of action is still say okay, shut up and leave. If the guy continues to intimidate AND pushes you or makes a hint at harming your family, then you better be prepared to fight and turn it into a mush right there with all your might and as fast as possible. There is only so many seconds of adrenaline in the body and better to use it appropriately, the guy must be neutralized as fast as possible. That should always be the last resort. However, in this particular situation, that the stupid moron was going to pull a gun and actually shoot it, was totally unexpected....
@SuperAussieOi No. what would have prevented the situation is following the rules. 1. Don’t park illegally in a handicapped spot. 2. Don’t shove people to the ground. 3. Don’t fire your weapon if someone is backing away from you.
@Ed Zamper I wont ever disagree that prudence is a good thing. But if you say the man who got shot made the bigger mistake because he happened to lack prudence, i cannot agree at all. One guy died because he wasn't prudent, while the gunman killed an unarmed individual in front of his family because of parking space issues. To those who insist that the victim made a bigger mistake, i just dont know what to say.
@Ed Zamper This sad tragedy can serve as a lesson to all of us. And i'd agree with u, we should be careful and tactful when interacting with people we don't know.
But I dont think there is any need to blame the victim. Afterall, how sure are we that the issue would've been resolved peacefully if the guy didn't shove the shooter. I mean, he was probably itching to use the gun. He had it in him, ready to pull it out at the slightest provocation. Was he waiting for physical threats at all? Maybe a bad word or odd tone was all it takes for that man to pull it out. What are the chances that, even if the guy just talked, he would shoot him anyway?
I’m speechless. This guy is everything you should aspire not to be. I hope the children of the man he killed grow to be wonderful people… sad their father lost his life due to Michael…
@Jimbo Jones i think he just wanted to protect his girlfriend, i mean yea at some point it sure was unnecessary, but if you think about it, it may or may not seem justified. people could argue about that all day, what matters is the fact that killing someone really is not an option, nor should it ever be one. starting a fight is one thing, but killing a breathing person because you just feel like that’s the only thing that’s going to protect you is 1. not only pussy behavior but 2. also a completely different chapter
@sürpriz.dersim62 yeah there's no justification for the man shooting him. He held up the gun paused for a second and then shot a man just standing and looking at him. Some people have a messed up idea of what self defence is they think if someone hits them they can use any level of violence they want.
It doesn't matter whether the victim was right or wrong, he started an unnecessary fight with an idiot and it cost him his life, if he just talked to him and wasn't so aggressive he would be alive. The other man was 100% wrong but it was the victim that escalated it to violence.
@Jimbo Jones who knows? Michael just threatened another person in that same parking lot the month before, in other words, he had a history, i think if it wasn’t this guy, it would’ve been anither guy as he was most likely just looking for a person to “rightfully” shoot. As for the victim, we won’t ever know if he was “starting a fight” or simply trying to defend his girlfriend because he never got to give his side of the story, regardless, the consequence doesn’t fit the action, he literally only pushed him, he didn’t beat him up or anything, he was objectively not a threat and it’s obvious from the video Micheal knew that.
@sürpriz.dersim62 the victim didn’t start it tho, he was defending his family, id do the same thing if anyone started walking towards my girl and yelling at her. the suspect initiated the entire thing and the victim was just protecting his family for a split second.
@Mateo Certain yess that’s what i‘m saying. i can totally understand the way the victim reacted, i mean, who wouldn’t. there’s literally nothing that could convince me the shooting was justified, because it simply wasn’t. i’m really sorry for his family especially his children and i hope they all have a good life despite the circumstances
"Just because a guy shoves you doesn't give you the right to shoot him"
True... but apply the same reasoning to the following.
"Just because someone is arguing with a woman (wife, girlfriend, stranger... I don't know their relationship) it doesn't give you the right to tackle him to the ground."
The yelling back and forth, obnoxious as it might be, is completely legal. Deal with it legally.
The victim is the first person to push this confrontation over the threshold into assault. Well congrats... you got shot. Bet you wish you hadn't assaulted him, huh?
Now of course, I'm not saying I think that shooting was justified. It wasn't. But as I see it, the victim assaulted an innocent man (legally, that man WAS innocent at that time) and Michael murdered a man who assaulted him. Both are guilty of taking a bad situation and making it worse.
If Michael had just used his gun justifiably, the man who shoved him would most likely have been charged.
You can't dig yourself out of a hole. Both of them are guilty of trying.
@Run the Numbers yikes, for a lot of fake legal talk you sure don’t seem to understand the definition of legal assault. Assault is not physical, verbal assault is infact perfectly legal cause for self defense/protection defense. The man had legal right to shove him given that he feared his wife was in danger due to the verbal assault. Michael saw the man back up and start to turn away, michael had no reason to shoot him because the man was not at all showing any sign of hurting him further then a shove.
@Run the Numbers honestly dude, this was a lot. you’re spitting so much to make the victim look like some bad dude. he believed his wife and children were possibly in danger. the fact that you automatically start calling him a bad person for a simple shove says a lot. all these other things you bring up are fine points if the defender hadn’t genuinely shot and killed the victim. if the defendant had punched him then sure you could say that was justified and they’re equal parties. but if someone starts walking towards my wife screaming profanities, im not gonna stop and listen if they specifically say they’re gonna harm her, i am gonna be sure as hell to walk right towards him and put distance between him most likely gonna shove him. he had no right to shot, any person who has any common sense would feel that shove and be like “alright sht i was getting too much” and walk away or just get up and continue. he took his gun pointed it at a man backing away and shot him.
I hope the children grow up to be wonderful people, too! They are the only victims here.
Against all odds of being raised partway through childhood by two classless, entitled people that park in handicapped spaces, assault people over words, and then raised the second half of their childhood without a father thanks to Johnny Shooter that was just itchin' to use those hollow points.
@Mateo Certain if you think physically assaulting someone because they yelled at your girl, you might catch a bullet just like this man did. Words are words. Dying over words isn't very manly.
it's not sad he's obviously not capable of controlling his actions. In what world are his actions okay? You understand you can easily kill someone pushing them like that right? Yeah I'm sure his kids will be great people lol what a great role model father they had
@Bio mutant It is stated that the argument between Michael and the Girlfriend could be heard from inside. He left his son inside because he knew he was safe. It is safe to assume he thought Michael was a threat to his wife(and baby), because he heard the argument and pushed him. To use Micheal's words, the Boyfriend tried to neutralize the threat, unlike Michel it wouldn't of involve casualties. If he wanted to beat up Michael he could've easily done so from behind, a good blow to the head is an easy way.
@Run the Numbers No that's you. You think is reasonable to pack a gun while antagonizing women and children. It's disturbing that you can't see why it's a problem. Perhaps you think Drejka should have gotten out of his old truck pointing the weapon at her and the kids.
@Looking 4 Things So now you're anti-gun? It was a perfectly legal firearm, so the first point is... he didn't break the law by simply having the gun... just like driving a car isn't illegal. But if a person driving a car doesn't stop at a crosswalk, THEN it becomes illegal.
Same thing in this case. Having a gun was not the illegal part of what transpired. The illegal part of what transpired isn't even that he shot a man who assaulted him (which is also legal). The part where what he did became illegal is when he used the gun to stop the assault... and then WHEN THE ASSAULT WAS CLEARLY OVER, he shot. Matter of fact, he probably could have legally justified shooting this man while he was being assaulted. It's the pause between the actions that made this a felony (and rightfully so... as the pause between shows that self-defense was NOT the purpose of shooting)
And if you truly are anti-gun, just look at violence statistics in areas with more gun control. It's ALWAYS higher (both raw AND per-capita). Somehow, people are safer around people with guns than they are around people without them. It's almost as though the guns served as some sort of... great equalizer or something.
It's my personal opinion that if you are a woman of gun carrying age and you aren't carrying one, you're retarded. Guns are good. Guns are hand-held steel "mutually assured destruction" and if we're going to talk statistics, women are the BEST people in the world to have guns. Even though women are not as competent with pistols, they use them more responsibly than men.
What the world needs is more men with guns... and WAAAAAAAAY more women with guns.
Lol. "Aspire not to be" Hilarious. Hes lived his life having no sense of ambition whatsoever. Retired at 30 and looking to shoot someone everyday since.
@Mateo Certain Thanks your protective instincts are intact. Its pretty frightening to read so many argue the father shouldn't have pushed Drejka. Im shocked by it.
An argument with words doesn’t require physical intervention.
He saw someone arguing with his wife, and thought, “I’ll show you, you SOB” It was malice and anger, not protection. My wife has argued many times but I don’t immediately come in and attack people.
@rafer Jefferson iii The world needs more of that attitude.
There needs to be a mutual understanding between a man and a woman... and it is so easy for it to fall apart.
The woman needs to understand that when she starts shit, she might be putting her husband in actual physical danger (because there might come a point where the situation escalates, and when it does... it becomes the man's problem).
The man needs to TRUST that when his wife finds herself in a conflict that it truly was unavoidable, and therefore the man needs to take over and perhaps threaten violence.
This all falls apart if you've got a domineering woman that doesn't like to back down from conflicts. Makes it impossible for her man to tell the difference between petty bullshit and a real honest-to-goodness volatile situation.
If you're her man, you have to look at that situation like, "I see that you're yelling... but I don't trust that. You start shit over dumb conflicts all the time and then expect me to back you up with violence... and this habit will EVENTUALLY get me shot."
It's a terrible situation for a man to be in... not knowing whether his wife is in a situation that calls for violence... or if she's writing all sorts of checks that you can't cash because she's a self-centered impulsive hag.
I love the confidence he has when he's making incriminating statements. Its actually hilarious. "Did he do anything to make you shoot him?" "No negative, absolutely nothing."
@Tyler Ramos I dont think pwnstar was implying that. sounded to me like he was saying everyone has a job to do. Cops are obligated to arrest and provide evidence, your job is to ask for a lawyer, the lawyer makes the cops find the evidence for themselves
@Shjkesnc man if you really think that you’re fucked in the mind. There’s so many ways he could have confronted her with out being disrespectful. If he did that then there wouldn’t have been any conflict. It’s his fault he messed up. I hope he rots in jail. 🤷🏿♀️
@Shjkesnc The white man himself parked illegally. Don't even try to bring up handicapped parking when he himself intentionally violated laws relating to handicapped parking.
@Clover MX "who wasn't doing anything" A man who has for months been threatening black families who were minding their own business with their lives, for months on end. A man who was doing the same thing to his family. Considering that's literally illegal, I don't think that the white man "wasn't doing anything". Tell me, if a man was threatening your family with their lives right in front of you, would you do whatever you could to protect your family? Would you defend your family from the undeniable aggressor, who we now know will not hesitate to end a human life? If your answer is "no" then you're a coward, and a fucking hypocrite considering what your personal politics probably are. If you answered "yes", then you're saying that the man who was shot did the right thing, and that the white man was absolutely wrong. So, is it a yes, or is it a no?
There are a lot of very racist people in this reply thread holy crap. Or at least self centered/extremely narrow minded. Like, chill. Killing isn't all black and white (unintended racist pun sorry). "Well, he's black and he pushed the guy so fuck him he gets to die" Curb your fascism Eh whatever, its the internet. What can you do about it? (also I applaud all those who think for more than 2 seconds before they speak and defend this poor bastard and his son.)
@Skeleton bones Ghoulie Unfortunately, the GOP can't seem to die off fast enough to get their racist and morally wrong views out of the system. The only thing we can do about it is call them out for it, and educate others so they don't become like these very people.
@Phillipe Sebolte he's not the parking authority. He had no business verbally accosting the woman sitting in the car. And he wasn't in fear of his life when he pulled the trigger. Case closed.
these kinda things wouldn’t happen if people didn’t park in handicapped spots and didn’t act like ignorant people when someone challenges they’re actions. if people just acted and did as they were supposed to shit wouldn’t happen
@pilt bike These things also wouldn't happen if people didn't illegally park next to handicapped parking spaces, didn't mind their own business, and/or didn't shoot a retreating and unarmed person. These things also wouldn't happen if people didn't threaten other people over minor and inconsequential matters. The woman is only guilty of a thing hat should just give her a ticket, her boyfriend is guilty of nothing, and the murderer is guilty of exactly that: murder. Due to this murderer's past, it's pretty clear that he might have started threatening her even if she hadn't done something, so it's still on him for making this whole thing an issue, it's still on him for threatening a person while he's armed, and it's still on him for taking another person's life in cold blood.
This is messed up on so many levels. This guy wasn’t even handicapped and still acted as the parking lot guardian who eventually ended a man’s life in front of his wife and kids...
Special Agent(guardian of the safe mart) Drejka deployed himself across from the handicap parking suspect and scanned the area as any navy seal spec ops operator with class S training would do. He was then assaulted by the opposing force and was able to launch a counter attack with a superior weapon, that being glock 22 cambered in .40 S&W with a hensoldt red sight and poly mag grip and titanium bolt carriers. The enemy was 0.0005 clicks away when special forces master agent Michael "the terminator machine force XTreme" Drejka eliminated the unarmed enemy force before they had time to retreat.
In short, the mission to protect the handicap spot the quik mart was a total success. I recommend a gold star for agent ninja assassin Drejka, the president sends his regards. The country thanks you
I concur with the assessment of Operator Drejka's noble actions. This after-action report has been accepted and filed. I will be recommending Special Agent Drejka for the congressional medal of honour.
Extremely professional use of force multiplier. Rumour has it the police chief shed a tear when he got to shake Drejka's hand. The nation salutes you, sir.
This is brilliant, suits this guy to a tee. Drejka reminds me of the meme "Wtf did you just say to me you little bitch? I'll have you know I'm a spec ops sniper etc etc..."
@Agfd humor can have a way of Illustrating ideas that are more difficult to express directly. The real idea is kind of horrible though, a man had to be murdered for michaels ego to be satisfied.
he's so wrong like he says i got tackled then the guy pushed him without walking / running toward him. put yourself in the position of the guy who got shot, you walk out of the gas station and some middle aged tatted dude is screaming at your gf, i probably would open the same way that guy who pushed him did.
Not justifying the shooting but why park in a handicap spot? Especially with all those open spots? Some of these handicapped people are pissed off at the world. I got cussed out by a guy in a wheelchair for using the handicap entrance for the metro even though he wasn’t anywhere near me.
This idiot was on the floor looking at the guy who just hit him who is already backing up, and yet he fired anyways? Timing is everything. Sure he was attacked from behind, but if your attacker yields you don’t get to shoot him.
The poor guy who got shot was absolutely justified in pushing the other guy away aswell. He was acting aggressively to his wife! Of course you would want to defend/protect your significant other. RIP.
No actually, he wasn’t. It was a verbal argument and he escalated it into being a physical encounter. If he had landed any different like hitting his head he could have died and that’s not an exaggeration. Fact is, the entire situation was wrong moves by both parties. Illegal parking, unnecessary force, and then the use of a gun unnecessarily.
@BrandenJ29 If the verbal exchange occurs in such a manner as to make one fear for their safety, it's assault. He's standing at her door. He has her trapped in the car as he's berating her. His verbal barrage was sufficient to draw the attention a customer who exited the store and then just sat in her car as well as the two drivers who pulled in AFTER the exchange started.
If a cop had been there Drejka would have been instructed to walk away and, had he not, he would have been arrested for assault.
Legally: the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim.
0 likes
Jerry Adams2022-05-04 22:52:41 (edited 2022-05-05 12:45:11 )
This guy talks like he is apart of local militia. He knew he was shooting when he hit the ground
How is no one talking about the guy sleeping in the courtroom at 47:41, if you rewind a bit you see him awake And then at 50:37 he is removed from the courtroom, I would assume because of sleeping
This is like a television commercial for "Say Nothing but Attorney Please". Good cop bad cop, just trying to understand. Look the dude with a gun was in the wrong for firing but NEVER EVER EVER speak to the cops without representation and NEVER EVER EVER consent to anything. The video may be damning, but perhaps while he was looking at the guy, before he shot, he saw the guy's face and eyes and maybe saw him swell up like one does before the attack.
I mean i get frustrated when non handicapped people park in handicapped spots too, but id never leave my vehicle and and cause a conflict. Id just think "That's inconsiderate" and walk away. No harn done.
I truly understand his point of view I dont think its racially charged at all I think hes a good guy who was genuinely scared and that arm crunching pain is enough to daze anyone. I'm not saying he should have pulled the trigger or hes innocent but honest to god the guy probably was in.shock considering he kind of just stands there dead focused as if his life literally depended on it. Him deciding to fire is his mistake outside of that people aren't breaking down his story and giving credit where credit is due.
i agree, obv you can look at the footage with hindsight and say he shouldnt of pulled the trigger, but with the adrenaline and the heat of the moment i can understand why he would still pull said trigger.
@ImFresh agreed I just hate how people immediately attacked him as the worst it could be in the comments. It seemed several people ignorantly just assumed it was racial even though it genuinely doesn't seem that way.
Racially charged? Probably not. Some suburban commando who has no one to blame but himself for the consequences of his actions? Absolutely.
This man threatened people with a gun in road rage incidents 4 times prior to this shooting. Not the type of person who should be allowed to carry a firearm with them.
William Fher2022-03-20 17:23:54 (edited 2022-03-20 17:34:22 )
1. You have to be respectful towards everyone and follow the rules 2. You can't be reinforcing the rules because you are not a police 3. Don't bring violence to a discussion and ovoid doing stupid shit
This is a self-appointed-vigilante type of situation. He probably at one point harboured dreams and aspirations of joining the police or army. Clearly took it upon himself to seek out those he perceived as wrong-doers and threaten them with his 'firearm'. His use of police jargon is annoyingly evident of this.
I agree with you. He seems so prepared with his answers it’s actually quite worrying. However he’s not smart enough to understand that assumptions do not get you off a present sentence.
Strikes me as the law enforcement/military obsessed (but not actually a trained member of those groups) type that is far too trigger happy. Probably watches tons of self defense videos on YT and fantasizes about himself getting in those situations so he can play hero. A legit danger to society when someone has that mindset
He should be in jail…. But the black dude who shoved him was a moron as well. You don’t just immediately shove someone to the ground who’s in the middle of a disagreement. Weird reaction by both men here.
@Tommy Mc idk I dont think the black guy is a moron because the video did state the disagreement was so loud they could hear the both of them from within the store. The dude was mad this wannabe was yelling at his lady like that
@Jesley Peralta Doesn’t matter man you don’t just run up and shove someone to the ground because they are yelling at each other…. Doing that is idiotic and immediately escalates any situation.
So true or false? He was assaulted before he fired his weapon. Telling an asshole off because he/she is in a parking spot, meant for people with disabilities, is totally fine. More people should be doing that.
I couldn’t agree more. I believe when people like this begin using this jargon, they think this will put them on the same level as law enforcement. It really just makes them look like they’re looking for a reason to justify using a weapon.
“Neutralize the target” “That’s my store” the convenient store handicap parking spot police… owner of the store probably didn’t even know who this guy was before this day..
@Micmimi56 It wouldn't matter as the US, Iran, China and a few other nice countries didn't ratify the ICC Treaty, so US soldiers are free to play as they wish.
Eerily reminds me in a slightly less macabre and sinister way of the Todd Kolhepp interview. He used all kinds of jargon and bragged about his "skills" in marksmanship etc... almost trying to play buddy-buddy with police and relate to them in some kinda tactical way. I find it super distasteful and vomit inducing lol 😅
@sinkingship5 then report them to the store management or something. Don't stand there and keep screaming at them like a goddamn barbarian. It won't solve anything. Also, being pushed to the ground doesn't justify shooting a man, especially when said man is backing off. Did you even watch the video? Why are you defending that wannabe vigilante?
I believe men should be built like men and should face up like a man instead of drawing up a weapon. Imagine Ronnie Coleman or Dexter Jackson standing there and arguing with someone. Would somebody dare to push them or be aggressive with them? However, if you're a pigeon shoulder, chicken leg specie arguing with someone's gal they'll most likely try to fry you up. Your only possible response is then to shoot and take somebody's life. Strange gun laws though btw in the US. I mean I wouldn't keep any weapon even if the Nemesis from Resident Evil gifts me a Rocket Launcher. Not because that I don't like weapons but rather because it is an affront to my manliness to carry one. The best motivation for bodybuilding for me is that when I go out on the streets people would think twice before getting physically confrontational.
@Kierra Shaw the worst thing about it all is that the murderer will never mature sufficiently to realize he was the bad guy. In his kiddie mind, he will always be the hero. He's probably already truly convinced himself that he would have been killed if he didn't fire.
This is why we need guns off the streets. So little boys in old bodies don't go around murdering people this way.
@gabrielle roberts And who do you think would be the one getting charged if he hadn't had a weapon? You'd be singing a completely different tune right now.
Yeah you shouldn't accept crap from people. But immediately putting your hands on someone for arguing about a parking spot is pretty stu pid.
First of all, they shouldn't even have been there. Its a disability spot, and there many other free spots. Secondly, he didn't physically threaten nor attack anyone. So you're still in the wrong and could be charged with assault for striking first. Thirdly, he probably didn't even know what was going on, but immediately resorted to violence.
The guy isn't justified for shooting (obviously), but none of them are in the right and none of them were innocent (except the kids). Fact is he initiated assault. What he got in return was way worse and totally unnecessary, but that doesn't somehow except it.
@HELP!!! hOW dO InPUt uSeRnAMe? People arent saying he was justified in shoving or that it wouldn't have been assault. Granted the man was shouting at his parter and there was kids in the car, so that could be considered some kind of justification, although he should have used his words first. But the fact that your trying to in any way say that him being shot was a reaction to his assault is INSANE. Was it assault, yes. Would he have been in the wrong had police shown up and no gunshot fired? Yes. Would he have got a misdemeanor assault charge (50$ fine) yes. Is there any possible situation where michael whatever his last name is was justified in ANY WAY to fire a gun and kill a man? NO FUCKING WAY. You are victim blaming. And its not okay.
@Lucas Booth "People aren't saying he was justified"
I can literally point you to a threas where someone tried to argue the guy was justified. And its not the only thread either. In fact, this very same thread is doing that.
So on top of putting words in my mouth (words which I literally preficed against), you say no one is justifying him when the literal comment I'm replying to is saying "Its justified cause he was screaming at his spouse".
I can't tell if you're confused or intentionally being dishonest at this point but I'm leaning towards the latter.
Lmao he's all acting like his arm hurts at first then when they leave he clearly forgot about and is leaning on it and right when they come back all of a sudden it's back to hurting and can't shake hands with it. He must not know he's being video taped...
@NFAisNFGAY You can't respond to any and every physical assault with deadly force, especially if you're the one who provoked the confrontation by threatening a man's family.
@Herbert West threatening? Seriously? You really don’t want to hold those people to the same standard. Guess they’re naturally that easily violent. No wonder people carry guns to defend from them, then.
@NFAisNFGAY If the verbal exchange occurs in such a manner as to make one fear for their safety, it's assault. He's standing at her door. He has her trapped in the car as he's berating her. His verbal barrage was sufficient to draw the attention of a customer who exited the store and then just sat in her car as well as the two drivers who pulled in AFTER the exchange started.
If a cop had been there Drejka would have been instructed to walk away and, had he not, he would have been arrested for assault.
Legally: the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim.
@NFAisNFGAY I think the racial element was definitely overblown in this case (as it is in many cases today), but even without it, there was still enough evidence against Drejka to support his conviction.
Marquis and his wife were no angels. I have no doubt that she mouthed off to Drejka, and the shove from Marquis was pretty excessive. I think Marquis could've gotten within 10 feet, shouted at Drejka while marching towards him and it would've made him back off.
However, once Marquis shoved Drejka down... and Drejka subsequently removed his gun.... the gun itself was obviously a deterrent to any further escalation of the incident ... because Marquis backed up at the point the gun was drawn. The drawn gun and Marquis backing up was supposed to end this situation. It is IMPOSSIBLE to make the case that a man, who is backing up at the sight of a gun, is a threat to the person with the gun. The gun should have served as the "end-all" to the situation.
The bottom line is though that there never would've been any confrontation had Drejka minded his own business. He wasn't disabled himself. He didn't pull up to a full parking lot with his disabled mother and then politely ask someone without a placard to park somewhere else, he was a serial pest that was looking for a confrontation and a reason to use his gun.
I can't legally purchase a firearm but if I were to pull out any weapon because I feel threatened, if they put their hands up and back away im backing away too. I don't want to hurt you but if you give me a reason to I probably will lmao.
As the old saying goes "I don't want NO SMOKE". It sucks that sometimes we have to because people are....ya know. This person on the other hand is clearly a coward who's pride caused another person to lose their life.
Gee guess he hasn't ever seen interrogation videos before .... He's obviously putting on the act for detectives while they're in the room. Two seconds before they entered the room his arm looked perfectly fine . What a pathetic human being
they're just trained to keep people talking. most of it is just being non threatening and backing off when they're getting to a sore spot. buddy buddy. even just sitting in the room like they are is an act.
Why did he agree to questioning? Isn't it general consensus by now with all these videos and tv shows that you're better off never saying anything and waiting for a lawyer to represent you?
I'm not 1/3 through the video, and I haven't reached a conclusion as of culpability (yet). But sweet baby Jesus!, after you've been mirandized, why do you keep talking?!? I'm guessing (fairly certain) that he's going down.
Not saying he should've shot him or argued with the mother after circling her car, but what is the correct response when someone illegally parks in a handicap spot? If they could leave in just 30 seconds never to be seen by you again, just to park somewhere else illegally in a handicap spot, are you just supposed to take their license plate number and report it or is it even treated like a law? I personally hate when people do this as I have an elderly grandmother who has to use a walker and needs the space that sometimes isnt given by selfish individuals. Please give clarity someone
This is a interrogating detective's dream....accused answering every question like it's nothing and embellishing it with all the details....proud as a peacock.
@Syed Hasan Ali Mahdi well done on completely missing my point. I'm saying that he seemed to believe the story he was telling the police and that's why he was so quick to answer all the questions and didn't ask for a lawyer etc
@Dean King Gotta remember that almost all the people on this channel don't believe in innocent until proven guilty, and only believe evil exist and not stupidity/muddled memories and perception. They've never had to be interrogated under stress and don't know what remembering under stress does to your perception, probably wouldn't be able to describe their breakfast if you asked them at noon while they're stressed.
@Lala Baba Pretty darn stupid indeed to discharge your gun at an unarmed man. Doesn't make him innocent though
He had his training... If you are carrying, the first rule of conduct if you are confronted by anyone is to inform them that you are carrying a firearm. This includes everyone that have any kind of "confrontation", which includes bystanders, and Law Enforcements.
What do you do when you get stopped by a traffic cop and you're carrying? Inform them that you are carrying
What do you do when someone is throwing hands at you when you're carrying? Inform them that you are carrying
You do not reach for it until you are in an immediate threat and danger to your life. That's what cops are also supposed to do when they need to pull out their gun, also that is why you shouldn't holster your gun somewhere hard to reach like tucked on the back of your pants, always holster them in an easily reachable but secure place. Falling down to the pavement because you were pushed by an unarmed dude is not a threat to your life.
Just saying anyway, it's a fine assesment in your end about testimonies. But the act is clear as day
@Syed Hasan Ali Mahdi No, you just haven't read up on the case. I read about those incidents, and even the cops themselves say that only two of those times was he said to have pulled a gun, and both those times the "victim" didn't press charges and he was released immediately. The other two times no one claimed he pulled a gun, and he was immediately released on both those times as well. You're so happy to paint this guy as some bad guy without even knowing all the facts. And yeah, it won't help. But I can still point out this subversion of justice. I feel bad for the US if this is their version of "justice".
@Alien Tree Guy He was not "tackled to the ground". He was pushed BIG difference. You're trying to paint this guy as the victim when he's not. This guy saw someone parked in the handicapped parking spot (which someone shouldn't do if they're not handicap) and thought he should play cop instead of inform the store he was at. Him circling their car and arguing with someone's wife she was probably scared of him at that moment. And this guy rightfully so saw a guy yelling at his wife and pushed him down. Backing away, the other guy pulled out his gun and started shooting. How are you fearful of someone backing away? A handicapped spot shouldn't end someones life. And like someone prior said he was supposed to inform him that he was carrying which he didn't.
@Alien Tree Guy i don't see the point of having to yell and intimidate someone because of them parking on the wrong slot. He knows there's a kid with the woman. He shouldn't have yelled at her, nor acted like a cop/body guard/storemanager when he isn't in the first place. Letting them know they are in the wrong parking space IS ENOUGH. Walking away, informing the store would be better. Also the store have cctv's right? If they didn't give a damn about a stupid parking space, why would he be so triggered out of something he wouldn't be fined for? I also want to point out that when this guy was pushed to the ground, the moment the one who pushed him back down, it just means he did it out of father instinct, trying to protect his family, He saw a random guy, yelling to his wife and kids. He didn't have any weapon with him that could threaten his life enough to SHOOT the gun. The moment he pointed the gun, the father stopped, so what the shooting is for?
Here’s a quote after Drejka was sentenced to 20 years from Markeis’s father: “In the Bible, it says that in order to get into heaven we must forgive those who trespass against us. At this point in my life, I am not there yet. And if it just so happens that the Lord chooses to take me before I come to terms with this, then I will see you in hell, where you and I will finish this. Mark my words.”
You get inro altercation that is none of your bussiness, you get pushed to the ground you draw your gun. Okay. The one who pushed you takes two steps back. WTF are you thinking that you shoot him ? ..... The threat has stopped. Get up and gtfo.
true, adrenaline in the heat of the moment. i dont think he meant to kill but when ur surprised and look up to see a bigger man, who already resorted to violence, its understandable why he could pull the trigger.
Markeis McGlockton (drug dealer) won't be attacking people in parking lots anymore and the gun happy Michael Drejka is off the streets. A win-win situation. Too bad the didn't ticket the girlfriend.
@Root Beer Did he though? I mean sure, going immediately for a push to the ground is not right, but his girlfriend was getting yelled at by some old sack o' bones. Of course he would go and intervene. To me, this case is 1% the guy getting a bit to aggressive with the push and 99% that old nut-job just wanting to roleplay a cop or a GTA character so bad he was willing to shoot someone and go to jail over it.
@Mitko Donchev Is physically assaulting someone in response to and verbal altercation warranted because there was a women involved or are you virtue signalling?Stunning and brave. Had he walked up and said sorry we where in a rush man do you think the "sack of bones" would still have shot him? If the colour of their skin was reversed would you call the black guy a "sack of bones"? Just being devils advocate here i feel both parties acted poorly and infront of children.
I've seen a lot of people talk about this but I want to clarify that the altercation was over when Michael drew the gun, the father backed up when he saw the gun. Yes the father should not have pushed him, but his wife was being yelled at, and he made a decision to push Michael in the moment. That however is not enough justification to shoot some who is unarmed and backing up.
Yes I’m honestly quite shocked at the people defending Michael. I won’t even say it’s bias (although it’s obvious it runs deep) - it’s just blind ignorance. God help me if I ever marry a man who doesn’t defend me - or a man who gets aggressive with women and then feels justify shooting his way out when confronted about it. Michael is a weak man. How do people not see this? A really statement about society.
He was not raising his hands. I watched the video specifically looking for that - he started to back up when Drejka reached for the gun, and was in the middle of turning away when he got shot, but he never threw his hands up. You know you don’t need to lie to make Drejka look like the bad guy right? The case was pretty clear cut without lying about how innocent the victim was, or the erroneous insinuation of racism. The shooter’s response was still obviously way past the point of being justifiable in any case.
Nun Ya2021-05-31 21:06:08 (edited 2021-05-31 21:56:17 )
@Maddock Emerson 1. Don't play handicapped parking police. 2. Don't yell at women. 3. If you are a woman dealing with a threat that you can't physically overcome. Go somewhere safe and be smart. 4. Violence is a last resort. Period. 5. If you can't argue with the handicapped police with no badge I don't know what to say to you. 6. People are crazy. If you put your hands on them, expect the worse.
@Choose Your Own Path he pushed him and the push caused him to fall over, he didn't push him to the ground, Michael just fell over because he wasn't expecting it
2 likes
Nun Ya2021-05-31 22:54:33 (edited 2021-05-31 22:57:38 )
@Choose Your Own Path completely agree with you. Im just more experienced with this than the average person. The system is in their favor. I don't get any heat in the hood out of respect.
@RabbitFangs Understandable. I just kinda unloaded here (no pun intended) because I saw a lot of comments playing up the innocence of the victim as if he were completely blameless, when he did assault the soon-to-be murderer just for being rude.
One man made a decision " in the moment" and then the man he assaulted also made a decision "in the moment". Funny how everyone can see this as a black and white issue when quite frankly it's gray at best.
Only a dangerously violent person would react the way he did to an argument. He is the one who instigated the violence.
Mike started an argument. That is no reason for starting a physical aggression. Furthermore, he could have been killed had he fell wrong on the concrete floor.
People die all the time from falling wrong. His reaction was 100% justified to a life threatening aggression.
It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself but at least he got rid of that animal. (whoever resorts to violence in an argument is an animal).
@Michael Zomsuv I was with you up until you said the reaction was 100% justified. Drejka's reaction was not a defense against an assault that was ongoing, but a retaliation to an assault that ended a solid moment before the shot.
I've been there, in a situation where I felt so threatened by a large and unreasonably aggressive man that I drew a weapon. I used it to warn him as I backed off. And that guy continued being aggressive after I drew the weapon. Fortunately I didn't have to use it, and I didn't because I saw that I didn't need to. That guy was more bark than bite. Point is, I didn't get that solid moment to think before acting, and I still didn't resort to killing or even wounding.
Meanwhile, Drejka had two seconds to get his bearings and realize that he was no longer in immediate danger. He had a moment to think, and then he shot the already-defeated opponent who was visibly retreating. The only way this could be clearer was if the victim was shot in the back.
I don't know why people keep saying this. They were not married. She was just his baby momma. She had three kids by him, all under six. Which means she was squeezing out puppies as fast as possible to keep her welfare checks padded and arriving on schedule.
@Don Miller lol, I don't know about that, but one thing is sure is that "being yelled at" is not an excuse for shoving someone on a concrete floor. Only an animal would react that way to an argument.
Well only animals would kill someone for being pushed, was the pushing unnecessary yes but did he deserve to die? No and definitely not infront of the mother of his child and his kids. Do you realize how traumatizing that is? High school kids push each other alot for stupid reasons does that mean they are animals? Does that mean they should die? He did not deserved to be killed. The LEAST u could do is to respect the dead man not calling me an animal and mind you that's the very LEAST you could do. He did not deserve to die. If you believe other wise then I strongly Suggest you never purchase a gun cuz with you're mindset you could kill a human being for the simple case of him or her pushing. Of course this is just a suggestion do with it as you wish thank you and hopefully someday you realize how disturbing this comment was and grow up. Take care
@Axel Agree. Definitely did not warrant lethal aggression, however.
Concretely put; violence was not necessary, even if it’s a very natural response to these situations. After being pushed and falling onto the pavement, the officer had clear time to make a decision as the perpetrator disengaged. The officer then made a conscious choice to shoot the disengaging perpetrator.
To say that pushing a man for an argument is wrong should subsequently be to say that Shooting a man for a push is wrong. Racial bias or otherwise, This comment section needs a desperate cleanse of double standard syndrome.
@c2.whitty That is definitely true too. As someone who does conceal carry, he was completely in the wrong. You only use a firearm if you are in fear for your life and you should never even think about touching it if you are angry. This is what is taught to those who are issued CCWs. This douche gives level headed gun owners a bad reputation. As soon as the initial attacker backed off after seeing the gun, this situation went from self defense to murder.
@JenEx high school kids are kids.. adults have to know better. Not justifying murder. But an adult can’t shove another man like that. That was a violent assault.
0 likes
Nun Ya2021-06-02 00:26:42 (edited 2021-06-02 00:27:07 )
@FlymanMS no, I live right next to the hood. I don't play weed smoking police either because it's none of my business.
This guy was low key excited to execute a black man let's be real. How are you gonna say you've never been in a fight and over someone pushing you, the immediate response is pulling out + gun and firing?
If you pull a gun and they back away, then the gun has served its purpose. Shooting them at that point is just murder.
17431 likes
Replies (358)
Alexander D2020-10-14 14:44:41 (edited 2021-06-02 08:46:15 )
Actually I heard that pulling a gun without the intent to use it is illegal. Haven't read it anywhere just heard. Edit: Aight guys, I get it, brandishing a firearm with the purpose of warding off an attacker is justified.
1 or 2 seconds isn't enough time to reassess the situation and decide that the threat no longer exists, especially right after being blindsided and dazed with a cowardly violent attack. The dead thug was hiking up his pants and advancing toward the victim to continue his violent assault, and only stopped after he saw the gun. That gun saved the victim's life. It's our crap INJUSTICE system that is in the wrong here.
@J T Pulling the gun saved him from a beating. Shooting the guy did nothing but get him pulled into a homocide investigation. I've been attacked randomly on the street as well. Your ability to reason does not magically disappear.
He's at gunpoint. You can shoot in a fraction of a second if he starts coming at you again or makes a move that looks like he's going for a weapon. It's not about how far he has walked away, it's about the fact that he is actively retreating from you. This means that you're in control of the situation at that point, and if that changes you can pull the trigger. And to address some other comments, I have been assaulted multiple times. Once I was attacked by four people in the middle of the street. Your ability to reason does not disappear. There is a reason that using deadly force in self-defense legally requires a legitimate fear for your life. A person actively backing away from you does not justify use of deadly force, even if they did push you down beforehand. If they are retreating then pulling the gun has worked to stop the attack. You are now in control of the situation. Unless that changes, there is no legally justifiable reason to shoot them at that point. This is not my opinion about the situation, it is my interpretation of self-defense laws in America.
@KillSpawn47 no I agree 1000% percent, and I know my response sounded immature. I think as humans we've become desensitized to human life. We watch ppl die on a daily basis, wether it be through movies, games , youtube. What I saw was a man attacking a man yelling at his wife . And the minute the "Victim" points the gun at him you clearly, CLEARLY see my mans backing up lol. If he lunged forward after he pulled out the gun, then I can understand . All human life is precious.
The guy was assaulted. He was pushed and fell to the ground. A firearm is a deadly force level of force. It is to be used in a deadly force situation. Once the guy pushed him to the ground he didn't continue to advance. There was no risk of death. He had no reason to pull his firearm and even less to fire it.
@J T A shove is what you get for meddling in affairs that are not your problem. Michael had absolutely no reason to argue with someone about something as insignificant as a missing handicap pass. I hope ur joking around.
@Amina Ballerina I don't have a wife, but also I'm not sure what you're getting at. I never said anything about whether I thought the initial push was justified or not. All I said is that it's not self defense to shoot someone who is retreating.
@Wowzapalooza I get it. I can sort of understand the pulling of the firearm for self defense. It might be a bit of a stretch though. But I agree the shooting was definitely not justified. He shoved him and was not advancing. The guy on the ground had time to see he was not advancing (although I understand time dilation in a high stress situation could impact his perception.) But once the gun was out, the other guy was clearly retreating. The guy on the ground had time to realize that and decide NOT to shoot.
@Wowzapalooza How can you be pro gun when things like this happen? What is so unique about the US that the average person needs a gun when all other countries around the world manage without? We still have to deal with our fair share of killings but it eliminates your average confrontation like this, from escalating.
@Amina Ballerina The shove wasn’t justified. It’s defined as battery, a crime. But shooting an unarmed man backing away is murder. Agreed? I understand that shoving someone arguing with your spouse might feel justified or relatable. And it doesn’t justify being murdered. I’m not saying that the victim bears any responsibility, not in anyway. As we know, the whole thing was instigated by the self appointed parking lot monitor. Just the same, the shove wasn’t legally justified—if the man hadn’t been killed, he might have faced his day in court.
@Alexander D You can pull a gun out legally if you feel you are threatened for your life (and can definitively prove this when/if it comes down to that). It is illegal to threaten someone with a firearm, or to "brandish" a firearm implying you have a firearm as a means of intimidation.
@J T saved his life? Bro, he pushed him and started to back away. He wasn’t showing any other signs of advancing on him. He should not have pushed him, but he was not going to end the murder’s life.
I mean, reaction times are an important factor, I think it was justified to pull the gun, but the guy backed away and he shoulda made a retreat. The father was mad, and truth be told he should not have pushed Mike over, that's assault, but he pushed him and then backed up, and then Mike should have seen that and not shot.
I get things can get hot when someone disrespects your woman. But there were bad things on both sides, very bad decisions, Mike especially. He was justified until he pulled the trigger.
@Monique L "How can you be pro gun when things like this happen?" - This really is a rare event. Think of the amount of times people have properly and effectively used guns to defend themselves. The numbers are hard to get just because a gun can be anything from simply pulling, to shooting and missing but enough to deter them, to shooting and them surviving, shooting and killing. Its estimated around 500,000- 2 million cases where firearms protect someone.
Your also ignore the main reason that it exists is because its a deterrent for a tyrannical government. Its very difficult to suppress your people when they have a means to fight back. Every case of a tyrannical government that succeeded first disarmed their people and you can't sit there and say that the American government wouldn't ever become tyrannical because they are human and can still be corrupted.
@Honest Jim Reading these comments is honestly turning me anti-gun in a general sense, and I've rarely felt like that. What I'm seeing here is a disturbing trend of people that think it's justifiable to escalate a fist fight situation to a murder. Shit like this happens all the time. A pissed off guy at a bar punches someone from behind who is hitting on their girlfriend, etc. Millions of times a year. That doesn't justify an escalation to gun use unless they're taking out a knife/gun/blunt object/or specifically vocalizing intent to kill or taking it beyond a typical man on man fight.
@Ellie Baker He was backing away for less than 2 seconds, which is not enough time for his victim to decide that he is no longer threat, after just being blindsided and dazed by a sudden violent assault. Right before he started backing away, he was hiking up his pants and advancing toward the victim, getting ready to continue violently assaulting and possibly killing him. THis shoot was 100% justified. The victim should not be in jail. The dead thug got what he had coming.
@J T "The dead thug was hiking up his pants and advancing toward the victim to continue his violent assault, and only stopped after he saw the gun." Nah fam, you are just racist. If they guy DID back away the gun served it's purpose
@Obedient Drone lol so u agree with my guy in this video?? He doesnt deserve to be in jail, so that what you're saying. My opinion on guns has nothing to do with this case
@Cliff Nasa I think part of it is these softies see shooting someone as a way to hit back. I had a old guy pick a fight with me once and when I stood my ground he want and got a gun. Im probably lucky he didnt have it on him and had to beg the old guy not to shoot me once he retrieved the firearm. His parting words were I may not be able to fight but I can still shoot.
@J T I carry every day you're wrong to think that shooting was justified. 2 seconds is a LIFETIME during an altercation. You get tunnel vision and things slow down. He was laser focussed on the guy and knew he backed up. He gave him enough time to back up several feet
Couldn't agree more. Absolutely no reason to shoot if the guy is backed away. He got what he wanted a shove, the guy was on the ground end of. But the other guy had to shoot him coz he lost that altercation. I hate how he was complaining about his arm when that guy is dead.... He has no remorse!
I think they're both in the wrong, they were only having an argument over a parking spot and then he got tackled to the ground, but then Michael shouldn't have shot, that was an unneeded decision.
@J T no, the word thug was made to be used against black people. It has always been like this. A black criminal is called a thug, a white criminal is called a criminal. Its like a murderer getting told hes a murderer because hes standinh on the dead body, and he says because they assume that a dead body means a murder has happened, the accuser is the murderer
@Joseph Moncada I didn’t say that murder doesn’t happen but in your everyday encounter like this, it doesn’t escalate to this, because normal people are not armed. This was a simple argument that people get into, its natural but within a society where carrying a gun is legal things can get out of control a lot easier. If you are carrying any other type of weapon it is illegal and is therefore far less common.
@Mike2014 oh really? So because a bunch of proffesionals deem this guy guilty, its obv because its a race issue? Your worrying about the wrong aspect of race buddy. This guy also illegally parked, and started verbally assualted the women. Hes a thug and the black couple were fearing for their safety so he was attacked
@Monique L acid attacks are still very frequent, and just as fast as getting shot. They literally run past you as they huck acid on you. Guns are not the problem. Black markets cannot all be stopped so to put efforts in tackling the existence of guns is fruitless
@Joseph Moncada Acid attacks are rare in western countries, I’m comparing the US to Europe, which has high levels of economic and political stability. Western countries are no way near as violent as the US. People are relatively comfortable, there is support for people of all social backgrounds and there is not a need to carry weapons in a high functioning society.
@Joseph Moncada It’s not propaganda, I’m just wondering why the US is so unique from most other countries where your average person wants or feels the need to be armed in order to solve problems. Societies that are equally as violent as the US tend to be poverty stricken, unstable countries.
@Spring Bloom "mechanical process" except hes not a machine. Hes a human. A human who was trying to live a fantasy as a hero who defended himself. You are right on one thing tho. This man decided on the ground that he was going to shoot him. Regardless of him fully realizing he is backing up. He wants to end this story as a hero
@J T He illegally parked to complain about her illegal parking, there should not have been an altercation between them in the first place. Our justice system worked perfectly in this instance. I don’t believe the family was completely in the right either but he didn’t need to kill that man.
@J T i actually agree on that one. i mean yeah its not good that he killed him, but that was clearly self defense AND way to less time to asses the situation, whats going on after being blindsided and maybe that guy would also have the gun?he clearly didnt mean to kill anybody.i dont know about the judge decision whether he should get a jail time or no, its really difficult case in my opinion. i would say ok, if he gets a jail time, it should be no more than 3-5years with a chance to get out earlier.
@fasfan I agree with not shooting, i'm however fine with him pulling out to stop the assault. the 'no reason' part is silly. He was on the ground, arm hurt and he lurched over him. I agree with the guy that said: after he backed off, the gun had served it's purpose and no shooting should have followed
@Amina Ballerina i'd try to defuse for one instance, and if that doesn't work, i'd leave. If things get physical, i'd defend myself and my family. The assault was not needed.
@AwoudeX I’m from the U.K. I can’t imagine a situation where I would need a gun. I can’t imagine many situations where I would be prepared to shoot anyone. I’d just rather call the authorities to deal with such matters.
@AwoudeX If my life is sheltered then I’m very grateful. The whole of Europe manages to live their life without guns. People don’t live their lives expecting the worse.
There should be more pressure on your government to provide a safer environment for their citizens instead of trying to arm the general public. For someone to own a gun they need at least some military training. You could not arm somebody like me, who is emotional and can react out of fear in particular situations. Fear is subjective and is not grounds to shoot somebody which will likely result in death. Being threatened and being robbed of property isn’t grounds to take a human life.
I’m not a religious person but I’m just not prepared to have somebodies life on my back. I think you are naive in thinking you could kill somebody so easily. Normal people aren’t killers, no matter how justifiable the reason.
@Monique L First of all, thanks for keeping things polite. Seems rare these days online regarding topics that have the potential to heat up quickly.
<<If my life is sheltered then I’m very grateful. The whole of Europe manages to live their life without guns. People don’t live their lives expecting the worse.>> the worst? no, i don't live like that either. I however do reserve a level of being on guard when in unfamiliar places. Life has taught me this the hard way. It's different for women however, you do realise that, don't you? There's far less empathy towards men in general. 'safe the women and children first' in disasters or in hostage situations, the men apparently are expendable and to a degree, society is harder towards men this way. Switzerland has a 40% or more gun ownership rate, is it part of Europa? Is Switzerland known for having problems with guns? The USA is a rather new experiment regarding individualism, it takes it to the extreme and from my perspective that more than anything else causes certain issues that are amplified when a force multiplier is at hand. My suggestion is to adress the issues and keep the guns and become more like Switzerland: guns but not the bad gun reputation.
<<There should be more pressure on your government to provide a safer environment for their citizens instead of trying to arm the general public.>> The government is already way too big in most western countries and the tax burden is increasing over time. The system already is stretching beyond what's wise to do. On top of that, i don't want a few people having more and more power. It's a recipe for future tyranny.
<<For someone to own a gun they need at least some military training.>> Do you need to be able to drive a tank in order to get a driver's license too? Leave out the militairy, they train to kill potential enemies. I do agree however that a level of proficiency with guns can be demanded of gun owners. A mandatory practice at intervals to keep you sharp is not a bad thing either, just like we demand from armed cops.
<<You could not arm somebody like me, who is emotional and can react out of fear in particular situations. Fear is subjective and is not grounds to shoot somebody which will likely result in death.>> If you say so, but is it reasonable for you to demand this of others because you personally aren't suited for carrying a gun? I rather foster responsibility instead of dependancy on government. Imagine an old lady in her 70's too afraid to go and walk her dog without a gun, but with she's comfortable because her bodily frailty is no longer part of the equation.
<<Being threatened and being robbed of property isn’t grounds to take a human life. >> You have the right to defend your property and yourself. If a robber insist despite you aim a gun, then it's not on the victim of a robbery that a life was ended. I don't want to live in a society where i'm not allowed to defend myself and my property.
<<I’m not a religious person but I’m just not prepared to have somebodies life on my back.>> I hope i never have to be in that situation, but i'll choose my own life over that of someone who's willing to risk it for some trinkets or money.
<<I think you are naive in thinking you could kill somebody so easily.>> I think i'm capable but i also think it would scar me for life and still i think it's better than keeling over to crime and just let it happen.
<<Normal people aren’t killers, no matter how justifiable the reason.>> Sure, but defending yourself does not equate to being a killer. Don't conflate these 2 things. Defending yourself also doesn't mean that you'll always fire the gun. A show of this force multiplier can be enough and that would be the ideal situation. On top of that, criminals don't play fair, they will have guns wether they are allowed or not. At some level it's better that law abiding citizens at least have some measure of equal force to defend themselves, because cops 15 minutes away aren't going to stop their bullets.
@AwoudeX If you read my other comment you will see I did agree that an argument could be made for at least pulling his gun. I kind of go either way on that one. But I do not see the other guy continuing once he was on the ground. So the shooting is definitely unjustified. Especially when the guy was clearly withdrawing.
@fasfan yeah, i read that later, we're almost completely in agreement i see. Shoving him full force on the ground from a blind side is a low act and in my eyes proves you're a potential threat and that justifies the showing of a gun and firing if the assault continues. That threat was ended with a mere show of the gun however, as he clearly backed up. The guy then watches this happen and still shoots... If i had been on the jury i'd have voted guilty of manslaughter for sure.
@Murderificationism I'd expect it in many instances where a show of force makes an aggressor back down... Not always though. On top of that if you are carrying and get knocked out and the gun is discovered, it might be used against you, so better pull it when assaulted and hope it stops the agression without needing to fire it. By your reasoning if a cop aims, there should always be shooting and no de-escalation? What nonsense are you spewing here???
He was just blind sided by a furious guy, and said guy stood there over him. I would have been dazed and really frightened. The shooter sounds careful and concerned about kids. If the furious one would have yelled at least, what is going on, that instead of threatening shove that put him on his back helpless.
@Sven the Bananaman I was also thinking that. Imagine you walk out of the corner store because you hear arguing and it ends up being some random stranger arguing with your wife. Although the argument shouldn’t have taken place at all, and the husband shouldn’t have completely shoved him to the ground I do understand why he reacted in a violent way. It shouldn’t have been taken to the next extreme by the man who pulled up to complain about their parking job.
Cliff Nasa take responsibility and accountability for your actions. That thug who got killed has to take responsibility for his actions, the same for the guy who shot him, he has to take responsibility for that.
@Amina Ballerina you don’t run up and shove them from behind. That’s a coward move. Use your words and try to deescalate the situation. This was all egos.
The white guy was the aggressor by starting a fight for absolutely no justifiable reason. The black guy was just defending his family from some random guy yelling at her. Therefore there isn't a single aggressive action he could take that would be justifiable. If you're the one being aggressive you do not have the right to self defence. You can't just pick fights and shoot somebody.
Him parking in a handicapped spot was none of that punks business and even if he was a cop, they would just get a ticket or a tow. That's literally it. There would be no argument.
This is how the confrontation should go even if he was a cop: "Ma'am, are you aware you're parked in a handicapped space?"
"(No)Yes"
"(Well, you are and) You can't do that, it's against the law. You do it again and I'm gonna have to ticket you."
@J T yea to protect his family who were being harrased by a stranger with CHILDREN in the car! That father had every reason to believe that stranger was threat to his family!
@J T so the guy defending his wife is a thug but not the guy with the gun? What made the victim a "thug" if you don't mind me asking? Is it because he was intimidating? The shooter kept saying it was his store during the interrogation even though he was just a patron. That sounds more "thug" like to me but I could be wrong
@J T well Dreka was screaming and yelling at a woman and her kids....so he probably came out of the store and wanted to defend his wife and kids...Dreka isn't an officer or a parking attendant, what is his authority to approach someone and start and altercation? He could have called the police if illegally parked vehicle was an issue....he also mentioned that he sees this all the time and it's a pet peeve so why did he only approach this family????
@J T Words DO have a meaning and if someone is directing some bad ones towards your family and you sit there and do nothing then you would be considered "a pussy" . I think the white man was in the right to pull out his weapon because if not he was gonna end up beaten like my meat at the start of september but nothing justifies him shooting it. He killed a man and got sentenced the maximum amount. It was not self defense bcs when he had the gun in his hands he was already pretty well defended. Also 2.5 s is ALOT of time to make a reflex decision on this situation. Only by his first step back you already know you are very well safe. You can go watch the ending of the video bcs you havent aparently at least you havent interpreted what was said
@Alexander D Not true. If there is not threat, it is called brandishing, which is a crime. With a threat, you may pull your gun, as a deterrent and a protection.
@Ellie Baker Oh, it's bad. You have no idea. My state got rid of the requirement to take gun safety classes before getting a concealed carry license so everyone thinks they are justified in shooting someone else over the slightest grievance.
@Monique L Honestly, it's the 2nd amendment and how it's been interpreted, then the gun lobby scares people into thinking they need an arsenal and need to carry to go to the grocery and then top it off with a HUGE problem with mental health and, well, that's the United States of Gunmerica.
People that call themselves pro-life don't care about school shootings. It's pretty sick and sad.
@J T Ah, says the guy who no doubt supports the president with over 20,000 documented lies! You are PRICELESS! You should take your comedy routine on the road!
@Schmoopy Von Boopy You mean how the government has done so well in afganistan? Issue is that if you have to view then entire population as an enemy, then you aren't going to have many friends inside your own country. You don't fight on their terms as a large military might, but other means.
@Amina Ballerina You assess the situation, if no physical threat is immanent you step between the man and your wife. Calmly ask what is happening, and try to diffuse the situation.
Correct. The most significant part of self defense is that you are not pursuing another, and in most jurisdictions that you are also attempting to take evasive action.
@J T “the violent assault” the man was screaming at his family and he pushed the guy to the ground, STOOD STILL, and the dude shoots him as he is backing up. That’s a violent assault? Seriously? Being PUSHED is not life threatening. No weapon, backing away once the gun was pulled, RETREATING. that’s murder. I know you probably own guns and that’s terrifying that you don’t even know that’s at the least manslaughter
e vj you obviously don’t know the laws. There is a law called self defense and there is a law called stand your ground. Stand your ground allows you to shoot them even if they are running away from you as long as you believe your life is in danger. Self defense once they run away you can’t shoot them because the threat is over. You don’t know the difference between the two
People do things under stress/fear that they wouldn't normally do under normal conditions. Especially if they have not conditioned themselves to it through training. Even then nothing prepares you for the real thing. Once the adrenalin dump starts coursing through your veins your brain will want to do anything but think clearly. Heart rate shoots up, tunnel vision, auditory exclusion etc.. FIGHT OR FLIGHT! . All you see is what you may perceive as a viable threat coming at you. Some people just freeze. Unfortunately, for all involved, his brain under the influence of all of that adrenaline/fear told him that that man was a deadly threat and he had better defend himself and shoot before the gun is taken away and possibly used on him. Just my perspective/opinion of course. We can agree to disagree.
Exactly. Brandishing a weapon is part one. This guy was unarmed (but still dangerous)..... and the situation didn’t warrant the guy wanting to inflict serious bodily harm. Even as a woman, unless he pulled out a knife or continued trying to assault me (randomly. I’m not stupid enough to start a fight), I would brandish and possibly fire depending on the severity of the situation. This guy was just looking for a fight and looking for a reason to use his gun. He was specifically looking for trouble, which is one of the biggest DON’Ts when you’re carrying a deadly weapon. Don’t look for trouble, and pray to God that trouble never looks for you.
@J T this is a bit late, but why have a gun if you are incapable of assessing a situation. If the purpose is to prevent/deter attackers from advancing, and you already have it on your persons, you should be mentally prepared to use it. Other wise what the purpose of the gun?
@Blaine Klaus idk, maybe the fact that he can shoot in literally a fraction of a second if he comes at him again? I've been in much worse situations than this, getting pushed down outside of a gas station in broad daylight is really not that scary.
@Blaine Klaus He initiated the confrontation even though he “hasn’t been in a fight in his life” clearly stating he was planning on using a gun and careless of the safety of others and himself. he’s pathetic and shouldn’t have owned a gun he deserves to rot in prison
Btw, the police and criminal justice system both agree with me, considering he was charged with homicide as a result of him pulling his weapon and deciding to use it with no regard for how the situation was unfolding.
So you don't think at all he would be abit disoriented after taking that hard of a fall? maybe he didn't have eyes on the target before he was backed up... saw the victim move his leg and then shot him. This case is not easy and i think a 30year punishment for something that is not 100% clear is way too harsh.
If he would have shot him 2 seconds earlier it would have been clear self defence but because he waited and the guy had time to take two steps back its a different story.
@fresh donkey ummm you can’t murd3r somebody for just pushing you right..? I feel like the prosecutor would be on his a** if he shot while he was first approaching bc where is the threat to your life? Maybe if he kept advancing after he was on ground could’ve been an argument for his lawyers there.
@John Samos I mean I think he could of more legitimately claimed he feared for his life and that the guy was about to pounce on him and it was a split second life or death situation, but after the guy takes two steps back its pretty clearly not self-defence.
@Alexander D it is illegal to threaten someone with a gun with no intention to use it or reason to. Like if someone cuts you off and you flash a gun. That would def be illegal.
@J T it's just a parking spot man calm down. The way you keep typing "THUG" in all caps makes me feel like you had some personal problems with the victim even before the push.
Obviously, this is the same feeling that the entire jury had. Your pointing out a known fact, but behaving as if any rationale person wouldn't reach the same conclusions.
@Kokonut It was a cowardly and VIOLENT shove, and the thug was approaching the victim to continue his assault when the victim thankfully was able to lawfully defend himself with his gun. The jury got it wrong.
He did not even need to show the gun its a case of minding your own dam buiness. And worst case senario take the illigal and show you have a weapon.... but if you have to show gun then you probally have to use it.... and this guy just straight up murdered a guy he was in the wrong and in the video it looked like the guy backed off any way
DO NOT draw a weapon unless it is already time for something to be destroyed. There is no step inbetween drawing the weapon and using it. It is not a threat. It is not a show and tell object. It is not a toy.
@Vandal Nope. The violent THUG who attacked the victim was IN THE STORE at the time, and came out and BLINDSIDED the victim with a violent and dangerous shove out of nowhere, simply because he didn't like the words that the victim was saying! I'm glad he got what he had coming.
@J T "Violently attack someone you think is weaker." That's literally what the guy with a gun did to like 20 people before this confrontation (let's say that they were even whiter than him so that you wouldn't put the blame on them).
@Alexander D I’m sure 10,000 people have already said this but in case they haven’t, I think you’re thinking of “brandishing a weapon”, which wouldn’t apply here because brandishing a weapon applies to situation where you are using it as a threat instead of as a defense.
Honestly if someone that much bigger than me came up and pushed me on the ground that easily, I would shoot too. I wouldn’t have even confronted the woman in the first place though, which I think was looking for trouble, and very irresponsible to do when you know you can kill somebody easily. Context is very important, but getting pushed to the ground like that I think is enough to shoot.
@charles wheelock OK nevermind, I've been getting replies from this and I've agreed from the first one. So I guess I'm replying just to say I'm agreeing.
@J T except this guy has pulled on gun on several people before... pushing someone once isn't enough to kill someone and calling someone a thug cause their black and a killer innocent cause he's white is telling..
@J T first off it was closer to three seconds, and even two is enough knkw what someone right in front of you is doing, but you surprisingly said something correct here: He did stop when he saw the gun. That means he was no longer attacking him. What Michael did was escalate a situation unnecessarily after it already ended.
@Damjan Ilic that’s not justice though. Even if we all believed in “an eye for an eye”, that wasn’t an eye for an eye, that was more of “blowing a hole in your chest for pushing me”.
@fasfan since he had no idea who the guy was or what he was doing it was fine to pull the gun, but afterwards he stopped moving towards him there was no reason to shoot him.
@John Smith it was three seconds though, and the man was right in front of him. In fact by the time he pointed his gun the man was backing away, and by the time he fired he took 2-3 steps back.
@Joseph Moncada he was unarmed though. The man not once said he was afraid the guy would acid attack/stab/bludgeon/strangle/etc him in any way. He just wanted a reason to shoot him and thought the shove was enough.
@Sean Gallagher I covered that in one of my replies. I said pulling the gun was a gray area. I don't know if I would have pulled it, but an argument could have been made making it justified. But I think we all agree that the shooting was not justified.
@Honest Jim no, that's not how that works. If you follow someone screaming at them at the top of your lungs gs for Instance, they get mad and push you, then you shoot them cause they pushed you, thats actually on you hun! And you'd know that, if you watched the video :)
@Dahliah b. only in the context you are giving which is very specific. In that scenario I am harassing you. So I am committing a crime. You cannot claim self defense if someone was defending themselves from you who is committing a crime. Its a false equivalence.
That is not at all what I said. If you assaulted me with your fists. You were the one committing the crime, I am not obligated to match you with the same level of force.
@Amina Ballerina i'd ask them what's going on and why they are so excited. And then i'd listen, understand their perspective and probably end up saying that i understand his anger and that we'd move the car. In return he'd realize that he overreacted and apologize as well. We'd shake hands, continue shopping and go home to make dinner 😊
@J T How did it save his life? Did the other guy have a knife out ready to stab him? No. He backed away. If he got closer even with the gun pointed then yes you can say he had intention of harming the other person even with the gun pulled out. But he didn't.
@J T bro what makes him a thug? And also I hope you don't own firearms because your way of thinking and processing reality might put you in the same spot as the wannabe in this video.
I agree the the man shouldn’t have been shoved, I agree that the man did the right thing pulling out the gun because he felt his life was being threatened. I don’t understand why he shot though. The man was clearly backing away slowly. And he didn’t even have to say “BACK UP OR I’LL SHOOT”. He just shot the other man. Also, if the man wanted to beat him up, wouldn’t a sucker punch be the better option? And it’s not like he intended for him to fall on the ground, he just wanted to provoke him and push him away from his wife.
@J T sure, someone is going to kill you because u talked to their wife agressively, it is this character of being selfish, thinking that everyone is bad, that lets these situations unfold in the first place. And also contributed by his bossy nature to begin with. See good in people.
@Monique L If you watch the video dispassionately you can see the guy IS advancing before the gun comes out, presumably to attack the guy on the ground. He ONLY stops because the guy draws his weapon. The shooter WAS wrong to shoot after the guy backs away, but stopping that threat is precisely why being pro-gun/carrying a weapon can be a life saver. Having some interpersonal skills, instead of blindsiding a guy might go a long way to de-escalation as well. Again, this situation went bad, but guns save thousands of innocent people a year in situations similar to this.
@Ellie Baker You do know you are exaggerating/lying to try to make your point? Not just anyone can buy a gun, there isn't a "significant" number of people who think shooting someone is the answer. There are clear thinking folks who are wise enough to know there are bad people out there who will do good people harm if not stopped, hopefully that means before the gun comes out, and surely before it's fired. You can't legitimately make a blanket statement like that and expect any intelligent and honest people to take it seriously.
He should have never pulled the gun. One of three things will happen at that point.. You will shoot them, they will take it from you and shoot you or if you are lucky they back away and nobody gets hurt. At any rate the chance that the third option will happen doesn't justify the risk of the first two. This guy just clearly wanted to kill someone.
@Deep Blue I was told that the police actually had a talk with him about this exact sort of thing a few days before this incident, where he was basically told to stop playing parking lot cop.
@Sa DMS A beating? Dude, you realize people die from beatings right? Also, you are allowed to use deadly force when you believe either a) your life is in danger or b) you are in danger of serious bodily harm
@fasfan He had time to decide, you can see the moment of hesitation. He decided to shoot anyway after he paused seeing the man back up. He was tryin to protect his fragile ego, not his racist ass from a beating.
@Malik Jones he pulled the gun the guy backed away this guy was waiting for an excuse to shoot someone give his one incher pincher the thrill of his life and that about sums it up
@The Sauce just for further context FOR YOU. The first thing I said was this
"This really is a rare event. Think of the amount of times people have properly and effectively used guns to defend themselves." - in other words this was not right what he did, but there are situations that using a gun is justified to defend yourself. So once again, learn to read because you say something idiotic
@Lottie Gallagher Got it. So words you don't agree with is justification for violent assaults. I'll keep that in mind. I don't like your words in particular.
@J T why do you call him a thug??? From his POV some random stranger was in a altercation with his wife while he went to get snacks with his son. That sounds like a caring father and husband to me.
@J T no way you’re actually defending this guy. If some old ass man was trying to pick a fight with your girlfriend and children, what would you have done?
@willshealy556 He wasn't "picking a fight." If I saw a guy TALKING to my girlfriend, I'm not going to run up and blindside him with a violent shove and then continue to threateningly advance toward him to continue beating him while he's on the ground...
Why are people here saying that the guy got tackled? Did they not watch the surveillance footage that was shown many times throughout the video, or do they just not know what tackling is?
@J T of course, the black dude who was protecting his wife is a “thug” whereas the guy who shot the dude for pushing him is the “victim”. Wonder where I’ve seen this one before?
@J T maybe he shouldn't be screaming at a woman and children for committing a traffic violation. last I checked that's not random citizen man's job. like what the fuck?
there is no justification for this. it was a fucking parking violation, and the victim pushed this dude to the ground because this dude had been screaming at his family until he walked outside. so his response to being pushed is to shoot him and take his life.
that's not self defense. his life was not in danger. he created the situation, and could have left at any moment.
@J T 1. the man never steps toward him once he hotd the ground not once he was levaing 2 your only calling him a thug cause hes black you have some obvious underlying racism cause the man was protecting his family from a kan yelling at his wife and kids
@Sa DMS You have no idea b/c you don't know what McGlockton - a younger, larger, stronger, faster human being who was high on MDMA at the time - was planning had Drejka NOT pulled his gun but it certainly seemed like he was going in for more.
@Cliff Nasa Incorrect assessment. That is not how SYG works which is why many experts agree that it was a justified shooting. Drejka had reasonable reason to believe his safety was in jeopardy AFTER being violently assaulted and injured and took measured action (ONE bullet) to neutralize the threat. Totally justified.
@fasfan McGlockton was high on MDMA, had a hx of assault, pulled up his pants and advanced towards Drejka 2-3 steps AFTER THE PUSH before the gun was pulled and used - totally justified shooting and many legal experts agree.
@Monique L lol...b/c the gun saved Drejka from further bodily harm and possibly death at the hands of a younger, stronger, faster drug addicted aggressor like McGlockton who had a hx of drug abuse and assaulting a police officer....that's how.
@Sabrason First of all... you're being just as much of an armchair attorney as the rest of us so slow your roll. Your opinion is just as valid as everyone else's. Make no mistake... that's all these are... opinions. We are all basing our opinions in our own experiences. I'm basing my opinion in my years in law enforcement as well as what I'm seeing in the video. But at the end of the day... none of our opinions mean squat. The only opinions that DO matter is the opinion of the court. It doesn't matter how many "experts" you say say it was justified, there are just as many other "experts" who say it wasn't. So again... relax. These are YouTube comments where people are just having a conversation about their opinions. That's it. If you're getting that worked up over them then I suggest maybe contacting betterhelp.com.
@fasfan I agree with many legal experts around the country who agreed that it was a justified SYG case. Valid opinions can only be based on FACTS and the LAW. Your personal agendas, experiences and biases should not and do not have anything to do with it. The SYG law in Florida is quite clear. Lethal force is allowed if a person reasonably believes they're at risk of bodily harm = SYG. Very simple, point blank, period. Drejka was violently pushed to the ground, injured his arm while McGlockton hiked up his pants and advanced 2-3 steps AFTER the push to continue the assault. That's reasonable fear of ADDITIONAL bodily harm since Drejka was already on the ground and injured. Drejka was NOT required to wait until McGlockton jumped on him before he fired. Your years in "law enforcement" are questionable and irrelevant particularly since a cop would immediately draw their weapon and fire at a violent offender who assaulted them the way McG did to Drejka and they'd shoot to kill. There are videos of that same thing all over YT Mr. "law enforcement."
@Sabrason Police do not "shoot to kill" so you obviously do not know what you're talking about. And I maintain my stance that all these comments, including yours, are just opinion and conjecture. I also think you need to do more research. Police do not shoot people just because someone pushes them. There are rules that govern the use of deadly force. If you're so sure this was justified under Florida SYG law... then why is he in prison? You know what... don't answer. Because I don't care. As I stated... you have your opinion. I have mine. I'm not trying to change your opinion. I was merely stating mine. You can either choose to accept it, ignore it, or continue to let MY opinion live rent free in your head threatening your world view so much that you feel the need to continue to waste your time. It's all up to you.
Nope, you are not a person in power whatsoever, everyone on earth is equal and jesus is coming soon repent now before it is to late. GOD IS WATCHING YOU SIN EVERYDAY!!
Avishai H Both of the people endangered them selfs because they were too quick to resort to aggressive confrontation. Both of them paid a heavy price for this. However, at the end of the day the gunman should not have fired. Watch the footage, as soon as he pulled the gun out the black man froze. The black guy halted the aggression as soon as the gun came out, he was also unarmed. The white guy was in the wrong and deserved time. 21 foot rule is invalid because he did not have a knife and he was not sprinting towards him. Lethal force is a last resort not a first resort. I don’t blame him for drawing his weapon per se but he should have used verbal commands and then retreated away.
@J T "hiking up his pants" is not a sign of continuing "violent assault". It's a sign of preparing for a fight. He pushed the man, then backed up and readied for a fight. As soon as he saw the gun, he started to retreat, and then was shot.
Simeon Roban you obviously don’t know the difference between self defense and stand your ground. I suggest looking it up. Everything you said is incorrect. If you attack me I can legally defend myself, that’s self defense, if you attack me or a family member and then run I can legally shoot you in the back. That’s called stand your ground. See the difference?
@Melarus I live in the U.K. and yes there is a small section of society that carries knives but it is a very small group and they on the whole are not threatening to the wider public. I don’t worry about your average person carrying a knife. As for the state, the police only respond to a gun threats with a gun. So I don’t have to worry about being shot by police either. If course there are other ways of killing people but without guns any conflicts between anyone are far less fatal.
Why would pulling a gun without intent to use it be illegal? I mean that would just cause people to use the guns more if they are already getting into a trouble for it.
@Melarus In the US you have people from all walks of life possessing guns. This is not the same in the U.K. for knives. Like I said, it’s a very small cross section of society, usually poor working class, who live in particular areas, boys between the age of 15-25. Like I said, only for reports of gunshots do a special force come out to deal with such cases. Your average policeman is not armed. That’s the way it should be.
That’s 100% true. What is also true is you don’t attack people. Not only because they might be armed, but because it is a shitty thing to do and if you happen to get shot because you wanna look tough, I’m not gonna cry over it.
"Pull a gun and they back away, then the gun has served its purpose" I guess it depends on the country, as a cop i would say yes, as a civilian i would say, meh why a civilian has a gun? But i know that you have the 2nd amendment here, i respect that and i understand that. It's an institution and a part of the USA's History. But as a European it's hard to think that a civilian can use a weapon like guns, assault rifles like AR-15 etc. I think it should be only used for military purpose, by cops and soldiers and not by any civilians.
Guns need a human to be deadly, but humans can be so dumb sometimes and it can escalate so quickly and it can literally erase the existence of a person, so i guess it's hard to trust that it will always be used on purpose. :(
(I don't want to do Europe vs USA thing, because i love USA, guns are a part of USA, i know that!!! I accept that! And USA isn't only about guns. It's an awesome country with many beautiful landscapes many awesome and different ppl and cultures. It's just hard sometimes for me to see a civilian with a gun :( )
Not accurate at all. You shoot until the threat is eliminated. Of course everyone will back away at the sight of a gun. However you don’t know what’s going to happen next. If they too have a gun, they will then use it because now THEY are in fear for their life. Like how stupid are. If a burglar points a gun at you, do you think backing away will make him back away lol
@MarcosElMalo2 plus that's not what the case was about after the gun is pulled he's perfectly safe and the person was backing up , if he just stood up and walked away pointing the gun at him as he walked away they both woulda been fine and the other guy would have actually got in trouble but now they both ruined their lives
@Honest Jim after he pulled the gun the guy was walking away if he just stood up and walked backwards away it would have been fine also apart of the evidence that made him become guilty is the fact he said he is not a fighter he even states he never fought in school and says he is not a fighter and he even admits people can feel confronted when he checks for stuff and stating the reason he feels safe is the fact he has a permit to carry a weapon so he states he will rely on his weapon , what if he said he was a trained and was in ufc and was said he wasn't worried he could just subdo someone without getting hurt or said he wasn't worried because he can run fast but he doesn't say any of that he says he feels safe cuz he has a permit ,and its also cleary shown the victim was walking away . The shooter was in the absolute right until he shot a person that was backing away and was not doing any more harm. If u were approaching someone with a knife to kill them and they gta style pull a rocket launcher from their ass and you start walking back do you think you think that gives someone the right to kill you. If if you started it and were going out to kill them it doesn't matter like you said the ignorance doesn't justify anything. Your words not mine dumb ass. Get wrecked.
@Smoke Break MMA alright I hate blm and all that other shit and I love mma I just got back from a 5 day wrestling camp and as a another fighter bro you can't just be assuming he's a thug. Like I make racist and I've said the n word im not perfect but I love black people they are the same as all of us ,don't judge a book by its cover. He could have been anybody , he might have been the next Israel adesanya for all we know.
@Smoke Break MMA it isn't about the gun or none of that i know for a fact my dad a white guy would 100 percent would have done the same thing in the victims shoes and I would also be very concerned and prolly frustrated for someone disrespecting my family.
@Theunkown guy LMAO, are you sure you're responding to the right person? Because what you said doesn't go against anything I've said thus far. So get wrecked? lol
@Rumchata Not accurate from you aswell, you dont shoot untill you eliminate the threat, you shoot to kill, and if he just survives your bullet, ok good.
@Damjan Ilic Uh, no. What you can't do is still shoot when you hesitate long enough to see them clearly disengaging from the situation. Not to mention, parking lot cop was legally the aggressor in this situation so he'd have a tricky time defending it even if he had instantly shot. Waiting until they put their hands up and back off just makes it even more clear cut.
@Honest Jim yeah I know there's no way I was gonna go back and see who I mightve replied to and see why I replied saying that, I would have to search for like 10 minutes
What an idiotic comment. First :"Murder" was never an issue, there is a big difference between "murder" and "manslaughter". Second : He was attacked from behind, he obviously did not see it coming. So he was in a state of shock. Do you really think in such a panic state, you can differentiate, whether the attacker has made a step forward or backward?? I don`t think so. He just realized that the threat was still there and shot out of panic. Blacks nowadays are sacred in the U.S. , that s why he got punished like that.
@J T well said, that is exactly what accurately happened. The guy who was shot was larger and bigger was indeed hiking up his pants, and advancing towards the victim who was lying on the floor, after being pushed down violently . The only reason he stopped and backed is after seeing the gun. Michael would have been in a hospitalized or killed if it wasn't for his self defense.
Quick story, yesterday i got my first car, i also own several firearms, and my father brought up that if i were to ever get in road rage or a public incident don’t pull your Glock out. I said” HAHAHAHA, Dad literally what the fuck are you talking about” and word for word what you said here is what i said yesterday to him. Like deja fucking vou.
Also your opinion(s): If someone was trying to run you off the road while driving, very aggressive like. Is it right to hold your fire arm out the window to show them you’re not one to mess with? Rather is it legal, cause I’m pretty sure someone trying to run you off is an endangerment to your life? Am i right or am i wrong?
@Gerhard Hauptmann you should go watch the verdict for this guy. its not the first time he has harrased people in a parking lot. he is wanabe cop who took things too far, he thought it was his duty to police the disabled place in that parking lot. he would sit in the gun shop accross the street waiting for someone to park there. most ironic thing is. when he pulls into the parking lot he parks iligally himself. then proceeds to verbally attack a pregnant woman an her kids for parking in a disabled space. He admitted in an interview that he would not have aproached people and confront them if he never carried a gun. he had it comming. Im glad he wont see the light of day outside iron gates again.
@M. Diane Julie Benton what kind of a racist bs is that? If someone pushes you like that, the dark side will command revenge or it will feed of you for the rest of your life. In the end you will hurt someone innocent.
"Do what must be done Lord Drejka, do not hesitate, show no mercy."
@Damjan Ilic wow...you brought race into this by what is expected when it is a n****. It is your choice to allow it to feed you in a negative way. Revenge comes in many forms; murder is one but often you end up screwing yourself. That is what Drejka did. To continue your view, you can argue that the McGlockton’s response was natural seeing an adult man yelling and intimidating his fiancée and his children. He was pushing away the perceived threat. He also had the natural reaction of backing away when he saw the gun as shown in the video. There was no need for you to bring race into and use the n-word
Can someone explain this, coz I feel I don't understand this part. Why did the Markeis shove Michael as soon as he came out of the store? He was just having a verbal disagreement with his wife right? Did I miss something?
@Wes Treadwell I know that's a thing but what's worse a situation that could have happened or a situation that did how many gunshot survivors are there compared to fight survivors lol
After being pushed to the ground, he took around 1 second to draw his firearm, and took three seconds to decide to shoot the man while he was about to turn around.
@J T…and 1 or 2 seconds of minding his own business would have costed the “victim” his freedom. You don’t walk up to somebody’s car trying to check them over a parking spot like you’re the police. He wanted that authority he should’ve joined the police department. Now I do agree that man should not have pushed him but as far as he knew some random dude was a THREAT to his family. And why does he have to be a thug? FOH!
@Racheal Silburn Pretty obvious that some of these people think he's a thug because he's black. If he was white they would have been shitting all over the shooter for instigating. Btw, my CCL instructor (ex-cop / cop shooting instructor) showed us this video as an example of a blatantly unjustified shooting and told us that the actual police had warned this guy to stop playing parking lot cop for pretty much the exact same thing a week before, when he caused another incident.
@Racheal Silburn How many people have you pushed with full force for talking to your family? None I presume, because people have ability to speak and most people will not use force before they try to resolve a situation verbally.
You never know if a guy will respond to force with a force multiplier :)
apply that logic to choosing between blindy assaulting a man who is right about your car being in a place where it shouldn't VS. admitting your fault, apologising and immediately moving your car.
@Alexander D It depends on where you live and what the situation is on whether or not brandishing is justified. In mostly all states youre gonna get fucked if you pull out your firearm without your life being seriously in danger. You really just gotta look at the laws in your state itll give you the answers even tho they may be vague which is done on purpose 🙄 hate it. In this case brandishing and using his firearm both arent justified, he just got pushed and there was no threat to his life. Sorry im late just thought id add my 2 cents since ive been in a brandishing incident. Also the rule if you carry is you dont pull it unless youre going to use it that way it keeps you out of that stupid brandishing bullshit laws 🤷♂️
@Monique L Monique - two sisters were stabbed to death in a London park recently by a man who had written a contract with some demon offering sacrifices in return for money. Their final selfie apparently shows them looking anxiously to the side as they see him approaching. I wish one of those sisters had been carrying. The police would never have got there in time. I hear of situations literally every week in which innocent lives could've been saved had the victim been carrying a firearm for self defence. But you 'can't imagine' a situation where you would need a gun? I would respectfully say that in that case you're not paying attention, or else you assume that things which happen to others on a weekly basis could just never happen to you.
This whole 'I trust my life to the authorities' attitude is why Americans are rightly loath to give up their firearm rights. Why on earth would would you be happy to entrust your life and safety to 'the authorities'? There were 700 homicides in the UK in the last year we have figures for. The authorities didn't save those 700 people. That's 2 people per day. Sure, they weren't you, but they still matter, right?
@gharqad That happened very close to where I live. It was very sad and it is actually a rare event. Of course we never think these things will never happen to us but there are precautions I do take. I personally never stay in Parks after dark. It’s something I stand by even if it’s only 5pm in the evening. It’s something I absolutely never do.
@Monique L Yes, a really tragic case. It's a sad fact that we take these precautions, but the fact that you do is ample demonstration that you know the authorities do not, and cannot, protect everyone, all the time, so what right do these authorities have to say to a citizen that they may not carry a device that could safeguard their own life? The law enforcement apparatus cleans up the mess and takes offenders off the street after the event - but 700 times a year that is too late, and does not bring loved ones back.
I respectfully disagree with your position, but I want to thank you for your courteous and civilised reply, which is an increasing rarity in this day and age. Have a wonderful and safe day Monique.
@gharqad This is a major cultural difference. When you grow up in a society where citizens don’t carry guns, the idea of having to, is completely foreign and alien.
@Monique L Yes, I appreciate that. That's true. I grew up here in the UK, in a country where citizens aren't allowed to carry weapons, but having seen how utterly ineffectual the authorities are, and how pathetic the justice system has become, my natural inclinations have changed. I would also say that nobody 'has to' carry a weapon in the US. The individual has a choice. Unlike here in the UK, where only the state is armed, and everyone else has to avoid certain places or situations and keep their fingers crossed.
@gharqad Oh I see, you are from the U.K. aswell. In that case, mental health services should have been alerted. He must have displayed some sort of strange behaviour before committing that crime. He was also failed by his family and community.
@Monique L I don't disagree. But this is always the British way: hold an enquiry after the event and find out what went wrong, then fail for different reasons next time. All of which, in my opinion, lends weight to what I'm saying: the authorities do not and cannot protect everyone, of course they can't! So we should be allowed to protect ourselves. If one of those girls had been carrying a weapon, they maybe get him to back off. Maybe. I don't say guns are a panacea, of course not. I dislike them, and wish they were never necessary. But there are times when they save innocent lives.
@Ramanesh Minister of Truth yes he is in Florida state prison he got 20 yrs but will be out in 10. I live 8 mins from where this happen on sunset point.
i'm a complete gun fan and collector, i think we have in Swiss even more gun's then the US p. Capita, but the main difference is our gun culture, our cops have by every search warrant to expect, that someone could stay behind a door with a gun, but we still never enter a house with a gun pointed to the people, we have a complete other modus operandi, ok, in Europe cops have at least 3 years of school, tactic, law training, especially psycho test, when they note, you are a little bit trigger happy, you don't pass the school, when he would do that in Swiss, he would loose the job and go too jail like every other citizen, maybe even a stronger sentence, because a cop should know how to handle or at least in Europe, they expect that from a Cop
What if they back away to their vehicle or behind cover to pull out their piece safely and retaliate? Shooting them would make them think twice about retaliating while severely injured.
@Sa DMS And how do you know that? The dude could have been armed and retreat behind his vehicle to start a shootout. He could have lunge to the person on the ground and stole his gun. Also a beating can 100% kill someone. If someone shoved me by surprise that violently I would consider him a lunatic and unpredictable.
@Nathen especially when the guy on the other end of the gun is backing away even if you shoot the gun learn how to use it shoot in the knee not in the chest what are the chances of getting killed by a gun to a beating 🤔
Only when someone turns their back is it no longer deemed self defense, so the guy backing up shouldn’t take self defense off the table, since logically the guy still is in a position to move forward & attack the gun man. I don’t think it was a justified shoot, but at the same time these situations are made within a fraction of Second sometimes, not easy scenarios to make the right decision in especially if you aren’t trained with a firearm or situational awareness.
Shooting a man this way is unjustifiable and deserves to be punished severely. But I think how the victim pushed him in the first place is also very aggressive and potentially dangerous (if you hit head first on the ground). I think this triggered the shooter for revenge.
Right hand - left hand handshake is the most revolutionary technique we've seen in this series so far. I'd be getting anxious just from how casually both officers just went with it.
@Saiyan Buu Jim always elaborates on all these unique techniques cops use to get a suspect to reveal info. The joke Latenight made is that this was one of those neat techniques.
Saiyan Buu his arm seemed fine during the part when he was waiting in the room by himself at the beginning. It wasn’t until the police were there and he tried to play it up like he was so injured he could t use his arm as a defense for shooting the guy.
It's clear that once he was shoved to the ground, Drejka was going to get kicked- possibly by more than one person. The dead guy only backed-up when he caught a glimpse of the gun. This all happens within seconds. It's difficult to imagine your state of mind when you've been tackled to the ground by an enraged person. What would you do?... Oh, and don't park in the handicapped space; being black isn't a disability.
I’m surprised nothing was mentioned of him faking an arm injury. When the detectives are out of the room he moves it completely normally, then when they come in he cradles it and says he can’t even shake hands with that arm. Then a minute later he is signing his name with that arm
@Devin Watkins it was a joke. Like Patrice O'Neal making fun of white people for having black names and vice versa. "Yamanika Watkins" bit on The Black Phillip Show or Dave Chappelle's "Draymond Green bit. Y'all need to watch more comedy.
having them sign the paper is a tactic, its such a routine thing to sign your name that people who are faking hand/arm injuries just do it, not realizing they are giving themselves away.
@Mary Beth uh, they are saying they broke their arm and could sign their name. The shooter didn’t have a broken arm or any actual injury, so I think they were just showing if you can sign your name with a broken arm then you can do it with a mildly sore one.
@C PA yea, they think it’s gonna get them sympathy I guess? Even if he was injured they dont feel sorry for killers, especially ones lying to them taking them for fools. Reminds me of the creature who abducted Elizabeth smart whining that the detective tapping him on the arm was assault.
Really feel bad for the son that saw his dad collapse in front of him. Kids gonna grow up without a dad over a parking space and some jackass who couldnt mind his own business
To be fair, it's bullshit to see perfectly abled people park in those spots designated for handicapped. But no one should loose their life over a parking space. If he was that concerned, he should have called the police or something but they might laugh him off.
@atom omnis it wasn't victimless, there is a guy doing 20 years because of it. Also JFK wasn't doing anything wrong by not staying inside. She was very inconsiderate of handicap people. People all the time stop and put people on thier place for stuff like this, without the extent of someone getting killed, and usually people say good for them, we need more people like that. All could have been avoided, by following a simple "community" rule, actually a law!
@atom omnis cause and effect. The cause she parked in a handicap spot, the effect someone got killed. Regardless of a handicap needing it at the time, is not relevant.. i mean shit someone died, because she parked there. Your not getting it, and i am grown, grown enough to know better to park in a handicap spot, well not without my handicap permit.
@atom omnis i also guess you are assuming all handicaps are visible? That's pretty stereotypical, to assume, that you need to be in a wheel chair, cane or limping.. you people, are typical :)
@JRugg1 1980 The fact that is what you take away from this really shows what a cold and sociopathic person you are. Nobody deserves to be murdered over violating a small rule. Perhaps they should have been fined for being inconsiderate but I wouldn't give a man the death penalty in front of his three young children for making a handicapped person have to travel a couple few more metres from their parking space. Nobody deserves that for such a petty reason.
@Local Pleb im pathetic for saying how it could have been avoided? They would have never been approached if they didn't park where they didn't belong. Hell, it could be argued she actually started the confrontation when rolling the window down and asking what the problem was. Pathetic!
@JRugg1 1980 I'm not sick as long as I'm the one showing some kind of emotion toward the death of a man in front of his family due to spite and revenge from some wanker with a gun
@JRugg1 1980 yeah, that's why i wrote 3 comments trying to explain a very simple thing to you, jesus christ i feel like im talking to a preschooler did you have lunch today? do you need to go to the bathroom? did you do your homework?
@david vargas it matters, i would also say something. Im also handicaped though, and know how inconsiderate people are who park where they should not, because they are lazy.
@Luxer true, but that entire situation could have been avoided if they simply parked in one of the many available parking spaces, and if the Husband didn't escalate the situation by getting physical.
I feel bad for the son whose father was a drug addict with a hx of assault. Kid is better off and will hopefully learn from his drug addict father's stupid mistake of laying hands on people.
@Winter Moon Along the same lines, NOBODY should be assaulted for having a conversation/argument with a stranger illegally parked in a HC spot either.....works both ways.
It's probably for the best. If the kind of lessons you teach your kids are to attack people who "wrong" you, you don't need to be raising kids. They'll grow up as bad or worse.
@boi boi Of course it is, bullets are great teachers especially in SYG states. Keep your hands off strangers or you could be forced to take the dirt nap.
@kb I know, you probably have people in your life who share your victim mentality, feckless weaklings who would cower in the face of a life threatening situation, frozen with fear and incapable of pulling a firearm and actually using it in self defense, helpless and totally beholden to a violent attacker and begging for their lives. In life, you're either a hammer or a nail. Drejka's a hammer, you're a nail.
@y/n no. But they just stopped to get get snacks. It shouldn't take more than 3 minutes
0 likes
The Like Button2021-06-16 06:37:29 (edited 2021-06-16 06:38:27 )
@Kek Lard probably the best thing for Michael Drejka’s kids to lose their father. He would have taught them to get their LTC and purchase a handgun and then start arguments since they have a gun and if things get heated they can just shoot the person. Those kids are lucky they lost their pos dad.
I had a pos dad but my mom divorced him when I was little and I don’t have a relationship with him. Good thing too because if I had, I probably would be an alcoholic, aggressive asshole that hits women. Sometimes losing a parent is the best thing for a kid.
@Deja Xyz read what you said here, it actually makes no sense.. from reading your cause and effect scenario, id say no, your right in your thinking, but i call how you explain it. "Natural selection "
Or maybe she shouldn’t have parked in that space? Or maybe that guy shouldn’t have pushed him for no real reason. Complex. Stop pretending like you’re some moral authority.
@Man with No Name the case isnt really that complex. I agree that parking in that space is wrong and pushing the dude was uncalled for however getting shot over it is unreasonable especially considering the dude was retreating. Any other situation and I would see more room a stand your ground case
@marjhonna brown Wrong. He went to prison because he shot someone that was retreating and no threat, but the husband just had to park in the handicap spot and then escalate the situation further by pushing him when his family was rightfully called out on parking there.
@JRugg1 1980 I see your point(s) and don’t think you’re a bad person for raising them, but the ‘he was no angel’ argument being rolled out into the obviously biased comment section isn’t a good look the same way as saying ‘if he didn’t resist George Floyd would be alive’ probably wouldn’t be a good look in certain areas. If you don’t want people to assign conservative frameworks to your comments I’d just watch and move on. Also, against your point of ‘if he didn’t push him buddy would be alive’ how do you know that when he brandished his weapon on several occasions against men and women in traffic disputes, one of which there were children in the car... you saying ‘if x then y’ could be extrapolated in any direction our imagination will let us.
@Bumpy Bandwagon im not sure i said anything about, if he didnt push, if i did, it was in response to the cause and effect point. I mainly was saying it all could have been avoided if she didnt park thier, because so many people were saying he should have left them alone. Yes, he should have, but first thing that happened thier was the parking job, started it all. I think it sucks a man died, it all could have been avoided, that ultimately is was my point. After that, i was intentionally trying to get a rise from commenters, who were pretty much attacking me, for my comments. It was entertaining for a bit, gave me a few laughs. Especially when the comments about being racist stopped when i said i was Puerto Rican with a black wife and kids.. it all stopped like you can only be racist if your white. Im actually Italian and married to a Italian.. Your comment sir, very classy. You are appreciated
Yeah you know what reading these comments made me realize that his wife was all like my man is gunna beat ur ass and shit like she didn’t have to be so rude and then buddy did assault him so like yeah messed up situation lol
@Not Me i work in the construction field as a pipefitter/welder.. i have thick skin, and i would bet i make more money than most of them.. not that, that matters to me, but it will make some of them even more butt hurt
@atom omnis but is he wrong? Dude wouldn’t of thought he was doing a public service yelling at her about where she parked if she had parked in the next spot over
@Dro yea no one had to die but they parked In a handicap spot than when they got confronted he shoved the dude so hard to the ground. He did that in front of his kids. So ya it coulda been avoided
@atom omnis If they hadn't parked in the disabled spot nothing would have happened. The guy was verbally berating them, nothing more. Then the guy comes out the store and escalates the situation by getting physical and pushing the moron to the ground. I say that because getting in an argument over a parking spot is moronic, I don't condone what he did but it was just words at that point. The victim died because he turned the situation from a verbal confrontation to a physical confrontation. No matter how much we say it was wrong, and it is, the series of events the victim enacted was what caused it to end the way it did. Don't get me wrong, no one should have died that day, taking a life for something so stupid is just sick, but the victims created the situation and then escalated the situation because the victim had to "act like a man" in front of his woman. I've got a nephew with muscular-dystrophy and it p!sses me off when I see an able bodied person parking in a disabled bay, but I just go about my day knowing they're scum and there's probably worse things in their life than their parking habits. If this situation remained verbal, and the victim hadn't gotten physical, no one would have died. The whole thing sucks, but it's not like it just fell out the sky from nowhere.
@Joe Blow hell yeah, this guy here gets it!!! The first victim, and the one still alive to paying for it decided he wasn't going to take a chance on continuing to be the victim. I myself wouldn't have used my gun, id fought back, but then she may have shot me in the back, or one of the damn kids where prolly packing too. Illegally of course.
Yes, and it was clear he was looking to pick a fight. He wouldn't have needed to have that gun on his person while going out to rant at the couple if he didn't think he'd ultimately need it.
@just another youtuber jeez calm down. You're literally on a channel where a guy shares his opinions without actually being able to know what the person in the video is thinking
As a CHL carrier I while heartedly agree. If you choose to carry you hold a major responsibility to never abuse that type of “power”. Never ever pull that trigger if your life is not in immediate danger. If you pull that trigger you better be damn sure that there is no dispute on the fact that you were in real danger and things could not have been settled in a non-fatal manner.
@Lauren Daryani it’s legal to open carry is it not in different states? Not only that he was shoved so he prolly panicked seeing someone as big or bigger just attack him I don’t think he should’ve shot the dude but I don’t think the dude should’ve just pushed him either it’s all stupid.
Is this a normal emotional state of someone who just shot and killed someone because he feared for his life? No emotion of fear or shooting or killing, just another day. Just another life.
He is a normal dude. Regular people like him shouldn't be able to ever have a gun. Just make guns illegal for normal people and stuff like this doesn't happen. It's either that or tragedies such as this one will keep coming, 1 father dies and another father gets sent to prison.
15 likes
tie the noose2021-03-26 17:52:27 (edited 2021-04-10 01:19:57 )
@Lauren Daryani he didn't rant at the couple. He told the girl to move out of the spot the car was illegally parked in, the man came out and pushed him to the ground from behind.
@tie the noose Doesn't change the fact that normal people can't be trusted with guns or these situations will keep happening. If guns were illegal these children doesn't lose their father and a normal guy doesn't get thrown in jail. Just stating facts here. What happens in a potential burglar case and wether you have a gun or not is irrelevant. But someone dying in such a case if no gun is involved is highly unikely.
@Lukas Lu and the chance of an innocent man dying in a mugging are much higher if people can't arm themselves. Don't take this one example out of the hundreds of thousands to make an argument against every single responsible gun owner.
@Lukas Lu wanna talk facts? Guns stop an estimated 1-2.5 million crimes every year. The only thing taking away guns does is give more power to corrupt cops, criminals and people that plan to take advantage of others.
@Lukas Lu I have several guns, I myself had actually stopped a man from raping my cousin and someone trying to break into my house. If you want to get anecdotal, we can do that. Just because Michael misused his guns doesn't mean every law-abiding citizen needs to get punished. I can understand making classes compulsory if you are purchasing a gun, but not taking the guns away.
@Lukas Lu so the overall crime rate is 7x higher but the gun-related crime is only 2x higher? That is AT best a correlation and not a causation which is how you seem to be explaining it. The crime rate is higher for a lot of different reasons than gun control. And comparing one country, regardless of size, to an average of over a dozen is a poor way to compare.
@tie the noose My comparison was merely a response to you claiming that guns somehow would prevent crimes rather then cause them. Even though there may be other reasons to your comparativly high crime rates I highly doubt the whole gun situation isn't one of the major ones. I understand where you are coming from though. If I were to live in a society such as the US I would probably prefer being armed myself. But that doesn't change the fact that putting firearms in the hands of normal citizens kill people.
@Lukas Lu and it isn't that guns "somehow" stop crime/would. They have and still will here and of course guns will still be used to commit them, but that is in every country (I understand the US has more). I'm glad you can at least see how here you'd want to be armed
@nightw4tchman As an outsider, your opinion carries no weight with most people in America. It doesn't matter which country you're from or currently live in either
@Lukas Lu Sometimes its best to look at the bigger picture. The shooter getting beaten to a pulp and dying would have been a tragedy, but the gun saved his life. His decision making after the gun was pulled is where fault lies.
@Stephen Paddock ? I am looking at the bigger picture? America would be a better place without all the guns, doesn't matter if this guy would die without it in this situation.
@Stephen Paddock Although I highly doubt his life was truly in danger in that situation. He wasnt cornered by a common thief with nothing to lose but by a family man just trying to protect his loved ones. The guy clearly overreacted given how hard he got shoved to the ground. But it is highly unlikely anyone would die in that situation if it weren't for the gun, that much is obvious.
@Paul Cowherd Exactly, people often try to shift blame every chance they get. Some times it's just human error, we wont be able to always make the right decisions and nobody should prosecuted for that. If the boyfriend lived i think nobody would make a big deal out of the situation.
I'm a HARD 2 AMENDMENT supporter, I agree with you to some point, no one can determine that for sure on others. And, no one should loose their right to bare arms because of this schmuck.
@skithe00 Many more lives are saved by guns each year than taken. Mine included. It's a right that should not be infringed upon. We have a right to defend ourselves. Govt gun grabs only remove guns from law abiding citizens, not criminals. And absolutely, we should leave ourselves completely helpless to Govt because Gov't is trustworthy and always here to help, right? Violent crime rates typically increase when guns are removed from society. More people die by knives than guns; should we remove those too?
@• Monkey Matters • This is the mindset people from actual industrial states are laughing about. Look at the UK or Germany. You think people there dont need to protect themselves? America will stay a joke until you guys work on your priorities.
@Lukas Lu Guns are illegal in Mexico and yet there are still massive gun battles that involve crew served machine guns, rocket propelled grenades, hand grenades, and firearms that are even illegal in the US. Cartels ride around with .50 cal machine guns mounted to their vehicles. Murder is already illegal yet it happens anyway. It's almost as if criminals don't give a damn about the law.
@Cuzinnn McGee Any sensible person would just walk away from the situation but ego comes into play and the guy escalates the situation by physically attacking. Lack of confidence and low IQ were abundant.
@Stephen Paddock Stephen, there is no doubt in my mind that Drejka would have opened fire on the victim even if he hadn’t been touched. That’s what wannabe snowflakes do. It’s their fantasy.
@tie the noose wrong. This is the type of bogus nonsense that drives the firearm industry to record setting sales of their inventory. Don’t believe the NRA propaganda.
@Cuzinnn McGee Oh I100% believe you, as thinking with emotion has become more common, you are a shining example. I prefer facts and logic over emotional response.
Bro you really think they guy who parked in a handicap spot when he wasn’t handicapped and then through a man on the ground for being confronted ab that . is in the right ?
@skithe00 "Look at the UK...." Yes, look at the UK, a virtual police state at this point, that could go topsy-turvy at any moment, and the people are defenseless.
@Heidi Schultz ja natürlich benutzen die Messer oder schlagen Leute. Es wird immer Kriminalität geben. Was schusswaffen allerdings bewirken ist eine Vereinfachung von Mord oder können Sie sich etwa nicht vorstellen, dass ein Mord sehr viel einfacher mit einer Pistole als mit einem Messer von der Hand geht ?
@Beardly 01 Where do you think these weapons come from? Maybe you think the cartels in Mexico import their weapons from China like with everything else? Guns are imbued in the American culture and its economy. Weapons manufactured for use both in the US-military and the public market obviously gets smuggled across the border in the same way drugs are. The criminals are responsible for performing the crimes, sure. But it is your culture and laws that allow them to have access to their armaments in the first place.
@Stephen Paddock The reason these types of offenders often are "family men" speaks to my point. Just another proof of why it is generally a bad idea to give these people easy access to deadly weaponry. It doesn't take much for someone to aim a gun at someone else and pull the trigger, anyone could do it depending on the situation. Take the gun out of the equation and it's an entire different situation since stabbing or beating someone to death is not even comparable to shooting someone. The reason your "family men" is killing eachother more then in other countries is because they have guns, end of discussion. Say it's a price to pay for your freedom instead. Atleast that's an intellectually defendable viewpoint and something I would be able to accept.
@Lukas Lu it's funny that you mentioned China and then immediately dismissed it. Are you familiar with Norinco??? We can't get Norinco in the US ever since Tiananmen square yet somehow fully automatic Norinco rifles show up in Mexico all the time. Yes, some guns do cross the border from the US but the automatics are coming from elsewhere for the most part.
@Stephen Paddock You call me overly emotional and illogical when I'm the one with the facts, if anything that is just comical. All I'm saying is that if you put guns in the hands of the regular population accidents such as this one is more likely to escalate into deadly violence. This is then proven by the numbers and statistics of said accidents in your country. You are the one desperatly trying to defend this mans right to have a gun in the first place, with no other argument other then saying that he could have died without it. Which is a rather extreme example of speculation that is obviously based on your own beliefs and culture. In contrast when did I ever "speculate" about anything? What exactly are you trying to prove with your nonsentical argumentation? That your gun-laws somehow make your people safer? Just look at your numbers and it is easy to see that this isn't the case. I'm sure it makes you personally feel safer and also gives you more control over the safety of others around you but you seem to be blind to the fact that when anyone around you could wear a gun that makes your surroundings more deadly aswell. Again, you are for some reason calling me sensitive, slow and speculative when I'm literally trying to give you the intellectually defendable arguments for your own stance on the topic. Resorting to personal attacks, especially when they make absolutely zero sense what so ever is a clear indication that you don't have anything else to say so please just don't. Listen, you ARE entitled to having a gun, I'm not trying to take that away from anyone. But you need to accept the fact that situations such as this one is a direct correalation to said entitlement or else you are just being an ignorant and selfish prick.
@Beardly 01 When googling the matter it seems to me that the Norinco brand is commonly used by the mexican army. Therefore I don't see why it would be strange for that brand to also show in the hands of the cartels and other criminals. Still, all the numbers I could find was that most firearms confiscated comes from the US and smuggled across the border. But does it really matter where the guns come from when the problem is your attitude towards them?
This is basically the reason why you can’t have guns here in Germany unless you’re a hunter or any kind of law enforcement. The amount of shootings here is as low as the IQ of the guy being interrogated.
My wife and I are armed and we are terrified with the prospect of ever having to actually pull the trigger. My wife deterred a would be attacker by pointing it at him after he grabbed her arm and she swung around and palmed him in the nose which gave her time to draw. She had been walking alone at night in an off site hospital parking lot as she was staying with me in my hospital room on a lumpy cot as she refused to leave me alone there. She had been my girlfriend at the time. She didn't tell me about it until well after I was released from my six month hospital stay.
@Lukas Lu lmao that's some piss poor google-fu you've done there. The Mexican army is not equipped with Norinco brand small arms. Most of their equipment is made either by the German company Heckler & Koch, the Belgian company FN Herstal, their own domestic arms industry and some M16 variants from the US.
They're not equipped with Norinco AK47s. Furthermore Norinco clones every popular pattern rifle e.g. M16s and others.
My attitude towards guns has absolutely no impact on drug cartels in Mexico but nice try at deflecting. In fact I'd go as far to say that the US does not have a major gun crime issue. Europe has had more deadly mass shootings than those in the US and they have extremely strict gun laws. The vast majority of the US has literally no issue with gun crime including the areas with the highest per capita gun ownership. We have like 4 cities that account for the vast majority of the gun crime in the US and the people commiting violent acts with guns are already in violation of our existing gun laws. Just like how during alcohol prohibition people still somehow found a way to get drunk and how during drug prohibition people still find a way to get high.
@Beardly 01 Whatever you say man, choosing between believing an online article or a guy in the comment section is about the same thing I guess. Its whatever anyway. But bro you have like 10 times more gun-related deaths in the states and mexico when compared to developed European nations. If you don't think thats an issue I can't see why I would continue bother arguing with you.
@Beardly 01 But sure, it might be unfair to compare the US as a whole considering that the tallies and laws regarding guns are so different depending on the state. It's the culturally ingraved belief that you need rights to weapons that is my issue. It wouldn't be a problem in itself if not for the fact that people are idiotic, selfish and emotional. If put in a stressful situation such as this one some might handle it poorly, which results in unnecessary deaths. If anyone that can get hold of a gun can be put in this situation and pull the trigger something is wrong since it could have been conpletely avoided simply by removing the gun from the situation.
The problem is, how can you tell him apart from everyone else when he comes to buy a gun and apply for a permit? You can't tell who should have a gun and who shouldn't just by looking at them. You'll only know that after he has shot and killed someone. So, perhaps no one should have a gun in the first place, no?
@Hickory45acp But honestly man.. Where did you get ridiculous idea from? And how can I be a sheep and a dictator at the same time... This might be the dumbest comment I have ever seen anyone make on the internet. Congratz man.
@Hickory45acp Eh, what??? Don't just come here and throw insults at people for no reason what so ever. Atleast try and take part in the discussion first. Normally this is how people settle their disputes. Look bro, I have no idea why your brain seem to have exploaded with emotion but try and calm yourself down a bit.
@Lukas Lu lol you're telling me to calm down when you're the one having a conniption fit because I criticized you on how you are incompetent about the right to bare arms. I have a differing opinion to yours to which I expressed it. My freedom pal just like the the right to bare arms is my freedom too. Bet that really infuriates you :)
@Hickory45acp When I'm reading your comments I can literally feel your anger seeping in from between the lines, you are not very good at hiding it. If you actually read through my comments you would know that I actually don't want to take your freedom to carry firearms from you. That wouldn't be realistic. You missed the main talking points by about a mile bro. But hey, atleast you explained your own stance on the matter this time before continuing to disrespect me with your made-up remarks. An improvement to say the least. Also, the comment I removed was just me laughing at the absurdity of your comment. I could write it out again if you really want me to.
@Lukas Lu this guy is not a normal dude lmao. This guy is the type of guy in class when he reaches for his backpack everyone takes a deep breath and crosses their fingers.
@Lukas Lu America can be better without gun? That’s laughable. You use Europe as an example without realizing it goes from one dictator to the next while the US didn’t. Now you don’t have freedom of speech also because you’d rather put someone in jail than having someone being offended. Sure it’s safer to put under control everyone you deem dangerous. But safety should never triumph rights. Never use people as a mean to an end. I used to be like you.
@Thien Nhat La Removing your rights to carry guns will not solve anything, I also never said that it would. I'm just acknowledging that there is a problem since everyone wants to ignore it. Also, as I just said it is unfair to compare the situation over there to europe since every nation here is so different. All I can do then is relate to myself and where I live. In doing that it becomes quite obvious what your issues are. Then I really don't know what you are talking about when mentioning dictators in Europe. You could maybe argue that Putin is one but I'd still prefer him over the kind of people you vote into power.
@Lukas Lu Not in the modern time, but since the US was created, there have been several dictators in Europe. The gun law was created to prevent dictators. Seriously, the US just can’t become a totalitarian government because the citizens hold most guns, they might not win against the military but a military take over will just cost too much for them to consider. The gun rights also make the US impossible to be invaded.
@Lukas Lu All nations are different? Is it as different as each US state to each other? The US is like Europe 2.0 more diverse, yet more functional. There are states that have the best education in the world where you are require to be fluent in 3 languages to graduate high school and there are states that are agriculturally oriented so people don’t go to college as much. Europe isn’t empires anymore, yet that condescending attitude that make them think their culture is better and they try to change other cultures is still there and you are an example.
@Thien Nhat La I'm not going to pretend that I know how things are in the different states compared to one another. I don't know that much other then what I can read online. But here in Europe we literally have some of the richest and poorest countries in the world at the same time. The cultural differences between borders is also massive. I don't doubt that there are significant differences between your states but definitly not to the extent that exists in Europe and its nations. I'm not saying that either cases are better or worse, just that it is unfair to compare the two.
When I was younger I used to really look up to your nation and what it stood for. The concept and idea behind the economy really intrigued me. In most ways it still does. But nowadays I'm just constantly finding traces of more corruption and injustice on a daily basis. I definitly do not think of myself as better than you guys, but I do pity your people and the ones that have to live under such stressful conditions when the potential of your nation is so much higher. Way higher then anywhere else.
@Lukas Lu Do you notice when you buy things from American companies, they don’t include VAT? that’s because each state has a different VAT. Not just VAT, the whole tax system of every state is different. Each state also has its own state government with its own laws because every power not granted to the federal government is preserved for the states. Each state has different accent and cultures. You will need to take into consideration which state the person come from to adjust they way you speak to them. Some states are crazy and wild but friendly and some are polite and highly educated. The street cultures, food, working cultures are also different. Some state are so wealthy that if they secede they would be in top richest countries while some states are very poor. You know most of these states used to belong to other countries. They still have the old cultures before the merge. That adds to the European root, the diversity in ethnicities, the influence of the native American cultures, and the geographical differences in every state make the US culture very complex.
@Carlos Jimenez and with recent "hold your ground laws" increasing across the US, it's far more likely for people like him to get away with this.... Just have to call 911 and say "I was afraid for my life and had to defend myself", then get a lawyer (the NRA is happy to help)
@Ingmar Van olffen it’s like you didn’t even watch the video. Did you watch it on mute? Or space out? You clearly missed some key points if you think this murderer is in the right.
Ehhh, that's why you don't go around just attacking people like that. If someone just charges you and throws you to the ground out of nowhere, it's not unreasonable to assume they will do something else to further harm or even kill you. The guy would still be alive if he didn't attack this guy, let's not completely shift the blame here.
@P. Roud Tobi Mi A random dude is shouting at your wife and your kid, of which you don't know anything of the context. You come into the situation only seeing a guy with his back to you shouting at your family. Anyone who doesn't get physical has more patience, but brandishing anyone who shoves Michael in this scenario is not "an absolute douchebag" and to frame it this way is to just be a complete asshole. Patience is a virtue, but there are many shades of grey here. If the victim went for a punch or some other strike, sure. But he didn't, he pushed him. Michael just happens to be a small guy with poor balance.
I love these shows but who else is developing a fear of potentially being a suspect in a crime you never committed and then having these really well trained detectives poke holes in a true story, causing doubt, leading to your death sentence or lifelong imprisonment.
@Moetez Ouelhazi This. It baffles me that everyone is just blabbing away, no one asks for a lawyer, no one refuses to answer. Most likely because it would make them suspicious - but they are suspects to begin with. If you don't say anything, nothing can be used against you.
However, I am glad most do blab away making it easy for the detectives so they can rot in prison for the rest of their lives.
I swear, all these meticulous notes are NOT for the purposes of trying to get away with anything, have an advantage in the interrogation or get one over. I’ll never be in that situation, (God! I hope I’ll never be in that situation.) (Makes more notes.)
@NPC_1138 we aren’t seeing those. Our host is giving us the interesting ones. The boring, “I’m taking the 5th’s are filtered out so it seems like everyone is stupid. But I totally agree with you.
@NPC_1138 its because innocent people think they have no use for a lawyer,because they are innocent,so wasting time on a lawyer may seem like a waste of time to them
He didn’t think he needed a lawyer because he killed a black man and thought the detectives would automatically be on his side lol he used words like ‘immediate threat’ and even suggests that the black woman was a potential threat!! He’s racist end of!
if you are a master troller, you can poke holes in their logic and then start manipulating your story to sound more like the life of the detective. just be like "oh i was just taking a walk" "ok you got me, i was actually on my way to work to conduct interviews" "ok you got me, i'm actually an undercover detective that conducts interrogations, and this one guy i once interrogated kept changing his story and he started pretending like he was a detective or somethin', crazy i know."
That is a valid fear, which is why you never ever ever speak to cops without a lawyer, unless someone's life is in immediate danger and you have information.
I am a criminal justice major and I am not a genius by any means but if you’re self aware and have a form of protection you’re ok. Victimisation is not as likely as you think
I’m sure those who have later been exonerated wish they hadn’t said a word to the police. People really do make false confessions under the pressure of a police interrogation.
I actually feel more confident that they would believe my true story after watching these. I always thought holding in emotion and being matter of fact was best to hurry and eliminate yourself and the actual culprit can be found. It seems that lack of affect and appropriate response makes you look guilty tho. Now I know.
Yeah and also your google and YouTube search history will be used against you! It will show as evidence that you were researching ways to avoid being found guilty of your obvious future crimes!!! ;-)
If you allow cops to believe you did a crime you were innocent of, and couldn't even prove your case enough to keep you away from being a suspect... you are stupid enough to go to jail anyways.
This only occurs when they have evidence. In every video on the channel, the investigators had some piece of critical evidence they dropped towards the end of the interview. But even if you did end up in this spot you keep your mouth shut and don't say anything. Don't even nod or move your head just stare up at the ceiling and close your eyes. You don't have to answer them and you have every right to demand your lawyer be present. It is foolish to speak without a lawyer
The guy started as an aggressor and ended up as a murderer. Paul, what business did he have confronting that woman? Now there is a widow ...and fatherless children and it all started because of a parking slot? Yet he had already parked his own car? Hope he stays locked up for a long long time, may have some sense in him when he comes out. Sad for all of the people involved though.
@Josh Murphy tell us more about how minorities are not treated with kids gloves else there will be numerous lawsuits against the departments alleged to be responsible by various minority action groups?
This dude was soft. Cant fight but because he buys a gun feels like he can get in peoples face...that gun gave him courage. Not his manhood. How many commenters here cant fight but walk around feeling brave with a gun...go to the gym cowards...
True but this guy was guilty you can tell in the video it was ego that made him shoot. He was heated that the guy pushed him soo hard. The guy stepped away as soon as he saw the gun. This guy was the one being confrontational in the first place
I have pretty bad memory issues. But I can tell you that, if you are present for something traumatic enough to be facing life in prison/death sentence chances are, every millisecond will be engraved in your memory.
With that said, also just like don't talk to them. Say I understand my rights. I am innocent. I would like to speak to a lawyer. I also would like a coke. Thank you.
That's why you potentially need to say nothing at all and ask for an attorney immediately. You wouldn't be the first second third or fourth innocent person in prison because cops twisted their story against them. There's a whole league of lawyers that have to work their ass off getting them out of prison and not all get out. Not even most get out. The Innocence Project.
@blobsndrees detectives are NEVER there to confirm your innocence. Never! They would get fired if they went into interrogations trying to confirm the suspect's innocence. Don't get silly and start thinking like that. Your LAWYER is there to confirm your innocence and you should stfu immediately and ask for one or you are going to be in for quite a surprise about the officer's "competence". They are going to do their job and bust you the first chance they get.
You have the right to remain silent. Let the lawyers/court figure out if yo are guilty or not. No need to help the cops/prosecuting attorney. Never ends well when people do thinking its ok because they didn't do anything wrong.
Happened to me, I got done for drink driving and theft of motor vehicle when I was 15 and I told the whole truth and the judge called me a compulsive liar and sentenced me, was the day I realised you can't trust anyone not even the justice system.
You can tell from the second the interview starts, he thinks he is getting away with it. The confidence and entitlement is screaming through the screen. Fascinating.
Drejka's issue is that he's a pretend soldier who wanted to put himself in a 'life or death scenario' so he could live out his fantasy. He uses military language like 'neutralize the threat' and brought his gun everywhere, deliberately seeking conflict in the hopes that he would get a chance to shoot someone.
He got 20 to life tho. That's what people get when they plot and kill their wife in her sleep. Obviously what he did was wrong but it wasn't premeditated and it was provoked by violence. That's manslaughter at best. That 3-10 years.
@Eric G Because he killed someone when they were demonstrably not a threat to him. And it was also demonstrated in the video that he habitually put himself in these situations. This conflict didn't happen by accident. He orchestrated it to happen.
@Eric G he started the confrontation with the woman sat in the car with her kids. The dad saw this and pushed him away. This guy pulls out his gun. Points it, the dad actually steps back away and then shot. This wannabe law inforcer just wanted a reason to shoot someone. He feels so utterly inferior he has to patrol the disabled spots at "his store" and he shoots an unarmed man who is now backing away.
@Izzy Kitty I really don't wanna be defending this guy so I'm gonna just shut up but my point is that it was obviously not premeditated and he was not the aggressor. Yelling at someone for parking in a handicap is not the same as initiating violence. He may have been the original verbal aggressor and started the confrontation but he did not escalate it. When he was physically assaulted that's when the confrontation was wrongfully escalated to violence and then subsequently he unlawfully escalated further violence. He is dead wrong for that but again, it was not premeditated and nor was it unprovoked.
@Izzy Kitty I really don't wanna be defending this guy so I'm gonna just shut up but my point is that it was obviously not premeditated and he was not the aggressor. Yelling at someone for parking in a handicap is not the same as initiating violence. He may have been the original verbal aggressor and started the confrontation but he did not escalate it. When he was physically assaulted that's when the confrontation was wrongfully escalated to violence and then subsequently he unlawfully escalated further violence. He is dead wrong for that but again, it was not premeditated and nor was it unprovoked.
It’s interesting to not that done view his taking out his weapon was not being an aggressor. Strange that. He also got out of his vehicle to play cop of the world. Also, he has a history of aggression. He was looking for trouble & he got his wish.
@stewqrt rankin u need proof that he left home with a pre arranged plan to kill. You need evidence of planning. That's why the DA didn't charge first degree because he couldn't prove premeditation. My point is he was sentenced as if it was premeditated even though he wasnt charged with premeditated murder.
Eric G Premeditation does not, under US law, have to occur in advance of a crime. From the Wikipedia entry on "malice aforethought" (which is another term for premeditation) wherein the 4 categories of malice aforethought are described: "It is easiest to break these categories up by premeditation, or express malice and reckless endangerment, or implied malice. Intent to kill or to inflict serious bodily injury would be considered express. This does not mean that the accused made a plan far in advance, but it could even be in the moment of the crime. If the person did the action knowing it would hurt or kill the other person, there was express malice involved, which is a form of malice aforethought.
Eric G he was known to start fights before. The store owner has complained before of him starting confrontations and harassing customers in the past. He carries a gun and starts fights, why do you think he does that?
@Eric G He started something in an aggravated fashion he knew he could potentially kill in and as soon as he was challenged he shot to kill. To my eyes he looks like a bully and a wimp, 2 things I don't like. Was it in cold blood? No. But apart from that this guy killed a father in front of his family over an incident he started. He's a terrible human being.
Here's the thing that is terrifying to me. This guy openly admits that he was not in fear for his life. He openly admits that he knew the confrontation he started could get physical. But he's not worried because he's just going to turn around and kill anyone who lays a finger on him. The scary part isn't so much that he feels justified in doing this. Murderers feel justified all the time. What is truly freaky to me is that he clearly believed that the law was going to be on his side. He truly believed he had the legal right to end somebody's life because he got a scrape on the elbow and was worried he might get some more. That level of unthinking entitlement is astounding to me.
And he keeps himself separated from the reality of what he is risking and doing by using euphemisms. "Neutralizing the threat" sounds cooler than "murdering a father in front of his children," I guess.
And it's not just the fact that he killed the guy attacking him. When you bring a gun into the equation, someone who was not your intended target could get hit. You can kill bystanders. There were children there that could have gotten injured or killed.
If you're going to start shit with strangers, you need to accept the fact that you might get your ass kicked. A gun is not supposed to be an all access pass that allows you to provoke people when you're angry without suffering any consequences yourself. A gun is not a tool for winning arguments. A gun is not a tool for manipulating others into doing what you want.
What an absolute garbage human being. Why does this make me so much angrier that some of the other cases on here?
Anthony Dunkley2021-12-22 13:07:21 (edited 2021-12-22 16:09:31 )
Well no... you don't have to accept you'll get your ass kicked, the other guy pushed him first, humans aren't all the same or have the same combat experience so why should they play by your stupid rules of self defense and get into a fight they didn't consent to? In saying that...the shooting in this incident was not justified, it was revenge, he had quite a bit of time to line up that shot when the guy backed off, it was calculated and evil
To me this is at the core of the problem in allowing just anyone to carry firearms in public - it emboldens them to get into situations they wouldn’t have gotten themselves into if unarmed and once they are in that situation nothing says they’ll have the cool to correctly judge how to use the weapon nor the skills to use it safely.
@Anthony Dunkley I think you’re missing a key point here…the shooter wasn’t just minding his business when he was pushed.
He was in a shouting match with the victim’s girlfriend. This was a confrontation he provoked. It was a confrontation HE thought COULD get physical.
I haven’t been in a fight for almost thirty years. But if I were to get into a loud, aggressive shouting match with a stranger in public, I’m going to watch my back.
You never know who else is with them or how they’ll approach you. Maybe “accept” is the wrong word. “Expect “ is more appropriate…
What you said perfectly encapsulates my thoughts about this case. This dipshit feels empowered to play amateur cop because he believes the law is on his side.
And in his defense, if I were a white man living in Florida I might believe that too. The guy who killed Trayvon Martin initiated a confrontation and then killed him. He got off scot free…
Let’s be honest, these kind of situations are the INTENDED consequence of the “Stand Your Ground” laws being propagated in states around the country. That’s why this is so horrifying…
@Christiaan Ingram "the shooter wasn’t just minding his business when he was pushed. He was in a shouting match with the victim’s girlfriend. This was a confrontation he provoked. " Literally none of that matters in a self defense case. Had Markeis McGlockton continued to assault Michel Drejka he would have been legally justified in self defense. What ultimately put Drejka in jail wasn't the interaction with the girlfriend, it was the timing of the shot and his interview with the police. He made it clear he wasn't in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm. You say he "provoked" yet that isn't how provocation works. McGlokton coming out and pushing Drejka is a second encounter completely separate from the initial interaction with the girlfriend.
I think what separates this case from the others from me is 1) that the victim’s wife and children witnessed his death. 2) the perpetrator thought the law would be on his side despite him not only also parking illegally but also killing an unarmed man in broad daylight. Two wrongs don’t make a right, as they say.
@Christiaan Ingram If I was you I wouldn't be trying to brag about my inability to comprehend English. You misrepresented the basic facts of what constitutes self defense and I replied with how self defense actually works in the legal world.
The only thing I'll say is that he was absolutely wrong, but this is a good example of not starting fights or participating in fights in public. You never know what someone is all about
@Robu Absolutely. But lets not forget his young children were in the car as well. What kind of father would have reacted any differently? His innate defenses to protect his family kicked in and he behaved appropriately in my opinion. Any real family man would.
@Looking 4 Things Yes, but his kids being in the car is not a legal argument. Had he continued to attack Drejka it wouldn't have mattered. The initial encounter is irrelevant to the encounter that ultimately led to the shooting.
@Christiaan Ingram 1) As this case shows, you would be completely unjustified in feeling that you could kill someone and get away with it. The Trayvon Martin case is fundamentally different in that the physical evidence pointed to Martin smashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete when he was shot. It may have been morally wrong for Zimmerman to confront Martin, but not illegal. The fact that you would just ignore this part of the case demonstrates how little you truly know about it.
2) This is most certainly not the "intended consequence" of stand your ground laws. They are specifically written to exclude cases like this. Florida is a stand your ground state; the fact that Drejka was convicted directly contradicts your statement.
You made dumb comparisons and claims that are easily refuted. Not only that, you had the nerve to condescend toward people that point out how flawed your understanding of provocation is in regard to criminal law? I think you need a hard dose of self-awarness quick.
@Looking 4 Things All right, that's cool and all, but that doesn't have a bearing on the self defense argument, or why Drejka was convicted. Its not about liking legal arguments, its about reality. When somebody like Christiaan Ingram brings up and misuses provocation, it muddies the waters of eveyones understanding of what truly went wrong here.
And this is why you don't give anyone a gun, but only the ones that are emotionally and mentally stable enough, with thorough training and restrictions on storage so they're stored safely, where no children and no one unauthorized has access to them.
From a non American perspective, that these things can happen and getting shot by a possibly unstable or emotionally immature person on the street is just... Wild. We have guns here. My dad owns a gun and always has. I have friends who do and I guarantee that most farmers have at least one too. But these kinds of things don't happen here. The last school shooting i recall was over 5 years ago, probably more like 7, cannot recall any other mass shooting really, and especially not someone getting killed in a case like this one.
To these weird "they wanna take away ma guns" people No, no one wants to take away your guns unless you are mentally unstable or emotionally immature or underperform in the required training to get your license (a bit like failing a driver's test) or there's any other reason that might indicate you owning a gun has some potential to hurt yourself or others So if you're still worried about your gun being taken away, you probably should've never owned it in the first place, because that'd mean you aren't mature or stable or qualified enough to own it.
Fkin murricans and their dystopian issues goddamn That father should've never been shot and those kids should've never had to witness that whole incident
@Robu Actually, provocation has a great deal to do with self-defense, under 776.041.
You might be interested in what the vague phrasing of "Initially provokes the use or threatened use of force against himself or herself" constitutes, but you can look to something like Johnson v. State, 65 So. 3d 1147 to see that an action such as banging on the back windshield of someone's car can constitute provoking a physical altercation, which will then bar the provoker from applying self-defense to their shooting in the aforementioned physical altercation.
Of course, one could argue that force provoking self-defense wasn't even applied by McGlockton, but that is also a vague line that could be argued each way.
My point with this isn't that you are necessarily wrong, but that you weren't correct in dismissing Ingram's assertions as completely false.
@The Lone Wanderer By your own definition, we can dismiss Ingram's assertions as completely false.
Provocation of force may be a vague line, but this case doesn't even approach it. The case you cited included actual physical aggression in the form of banging on someone's car. This was an argument over parking in a handicap spot. Against someone that was not even the target of the alleged self defense. A verbal argument is in no way equivalent to a physical altercation. This holds true especially in American law.
No fists were thrown. No physical aggression was made. As far as we know, no verbal threats of physical force were made either.
Drejka was most certainly in the wrong here, but not due to any sort of provocation as the law defines it.
@The Lone Wanderer 776.041 says you are allowed to defend yourself if you are in fear of great bodily harm or death even if you provoked something. If Drejka is on the ground getting attacked it dosnt really matter if anything was provoked. He would be in enough reasonable fear to defend himself.
Whatever was happening between Drejka and the girlfriend doesn't really matter because Mcglocklin hadn't seen it. He had no reason to believe Drejka was enough of a threat to his girlfriend to attack him. You can't go backwards with provocation. You can't say Drejka provoked the push with an altercation with another person that the attacker had no knowledge of.
@Junior I never meant to allege that Ingram was right, only that he wasn't completely wrong, like some others said. Provocation does have a place in U.S law.
Provocation, as defined by Cornell Law, an Ivy league law school, "'Provocation' is that which causes, at the time of the act, reason be disturbed or obscured by passion to an extent which might render ordinary persons, of average disposition, liable to act rashly or without due deliberation or reflection, and from passion, rather than judgment."
As we can see from this legal definition of provocation, someone acting in a hostile way, such as screaming point-blank at a loved one, could incite a person to be "disturbed or obscured by passion to an extent which might render ordinary persons... liable to act rashly..."
You are right, though. Nothing physical happened, although the victim had seen his loved one being yelled at. It could be argued either way, really, if provocation occurred in this instance. I never meant to assert that there was provocation, only that provocation is an important element in self-defense and that one could potentially argue it in this case.
@Looking 4 Things a lot of people...maybe most would DE-ESCALATE & just leave !!!! keep your family safe....
2 likes
jordan p2021-12-24 11:34:35 (edited 2021-12-24 11:35:21 )
@Little Loner Ahh so nice of you to put words in my mouth that I did not say instead of actually refuting my argument. Of course I have problems with mentally unstable people owning firearms. As a police officer, I consifiscate firearms off mentally unstable individuals and domestic abusers (before they're even convicted of a crime) on a normal basis. You, on the other hand, attacked Americans who rightfully believe people in the Government are coming for their guns because numerous people in the Government openly stated that as their objective. Brush up on your reading comprehension chap.
@jordan p how do you think the whole gun thing and the 3 armed robbers plays out in every other country? And have you ever noticed that other countries don't have public opinions formed through fake arguments and agendas being pushed to the extreme?
Have you every like, given a thought to how other countries function or do you exclusively lap off the american plate bc y'all are so special nothing else compares?
@Little Loner So do you have any actual argument or are you just going to keep throwing personal insults? That's something who knows they clearly lost the argument and has nothing of substance to say.
@Looking 4 Things A real man wouldn't run out a store and push a guy to the ground without figuring out what was going on and put his family in more danger.
So, he's obviously been to at least some conceal carry courses. He was using canned phrases from those courses. You're taught "neutralizing the threat" is a term utilized to show that you were in fear of great bodily harm or death, which you are allowed to use deadly force to protect yourself from. The thing he forgot from the CCW course is that if you are carrying, it is also your duty to try and AVOID confrontation and the people I talk to in the 2A community are all on the same page about that. When I carry I am looking to back off, and get out of there, you never want to skin that pistol unless you're certain you cannot get out of the situation safely.
@Robu If I was out with someone of your mindset a criminal could attack me take my purse and knock me to the ground while you're trying to figure out legal arguments. Very scary
@Looking 4 Things Lady, I'm literally a lawyer. I've been telling you for weeks now how this works from a legal perspective and your beloved chocolate kiwi isn't right about provocation. This weird freak out session you're having in the comments needs to stop. You're embarrassing yourself.
@Racmaster00 I don't believe you're aware of what a real life conversation is if you think a discussion where people dissagree is "cringe" and one party of the 10+ participating is just here because they love to argue. I suggest going outside and talking to people. It will help you once you get out of middle school.
Well... why not? Statistically the people who think like him in such situations get to live far more than the people who do not hink like him and just sit there hoping for the best. In this instance the attacker was (probably)not going to attack a 2nd time but in many other instances the attacker goes berserk and kills the attacked.
Well by the same token, the victim also initiated a fight against a man for whom he knew nothing, he ignored whether he was carrying a gun or not. But he thought of it smart to go from behind and push him extremely violently. Now I get it, he had his kids and wife there but still the shooter was not yet aggressive, he did not do anything physical, he was just arguing with his wife. The victim thought he had the advantage coming sneakily from behind and pushing him literally flying him in the air and dropping him on the ground which of course initiate the knee-jerk reaction of taking out his gun and shooting him. Wrong to do so? Wrong of course. But we need also to remind the wrong doing of the victim no matter if it was on a lesser degree. I mean, beyond any legal concerns here, you don't go around in a country where there is high percentage of gun ownership to start physical fights like these precisely because you never know if the other person is carrying a gun.
I think in here there is a lot of racism against the white guy. If you reversed the races there would be far more people trying to find excuses for the shooter - and don't even try to say otherwise. That sneaky push from behind was extremely violent. It does not matter if it was not lethal (which could actually be in case he landed with his head down - people died by far less violent falls), it was still extremely violent and extremely vicious. If the victim just went in front of the guy between him and his wife none of that would had happened.. But the victim chose to attack from behind. The viciousness of his attack triggered the violent reaction from the shooter. Now don't get triggered by that, Ii am just explaining the basics here, I am not morally, let alone legally, justifying the shooter : this was still a murder, but not a cold-blooded one. It was a hot-blooded murder in the middle of a violent physical fight. The shooter did not kill the victim for fearing his life but rather for revenge for that vicious attack. It is clear cut.
@Christiaan Ingram --- exactly; Drejkla was in the habit of confronting people who parked in handicapped parking without a permit. He was a self-appointed 'enforcer' going around irritating people to no good purpose. In other words, NOT minding his own business. Michael heard raised voices and went outside to see Drejlka arguing with his wife. Basically, Drejlka was harassing her --- a mom with 2 kids in a car waiting for her spouse to return. If Drejlka had let them be, Michael would have returned to the car, and the family would be on their way.
It made me feel sick to see that creep walk around the car, with a presumption that he needed to bother people who were simply going about their day.
I guess this case really bothers me more than others I've read.
@bewing77 ---- Please, please, do NOT judge law abiding citizens who have a CCP. This guy, Drejlka, is an idiot. He went looking for trouble, bothering people who are simply living their lives. He's a bully, and a dangerously ignorant one, at that. He had NO reason to pick an argument with Michael's wife. HE was the aggressor -- confronting and bothering people who aren't harming anyone. The parking lot was mostly empty, ffs! People who educate themselves about firearm laws, and attend firearm safety lessons (which are required) know that carrying is not the means to solve arguments.
It's bully's like Drejlka who make the rest of the law abiding, reasonable people who carry look bad. He is the exception, not the rule.
@Soraya Kapetti So, genuine question. If I blindsided you, pushed you to the ground, and continued to attack you, are you not allowed to defend yourself with deadly force because I don't have a knife or gun? If I had a gun or knige are you going to wait until I have my gun out ready to shoot or my knife within stabbing distance to try and draw on me when I already have the upper hand?
Just imagine this crime long ago. No questions asked he’d be free because of race. But now cameras are everywhere and finally we are able to see the truth. From thugs to police officers.
@Anthony Dunkley I agree with apart of what you said. But disagree with the part where u said "he had time to line up that shot when the guy backed off" he had time to NOT fire that shot when the guy backed off but because Drek's thought it was revenge he had time to fire his weapon.
@BlenderBanana Jordan P does. According to 2019 data between 60000 to 2.5 million acts of self defense MAY jave occurred during that year. He chose the highest number to help his case. Almost an impossible statistic to prove given how many aren't reported, false reports, but the report admits this data is unreliable.
Also, no where in the article does it state that guns saved 2.5 million lives only that it was possible that up 2.5 million situations where a gun was used in self-defense. A good person with a gun MAY save lives but we have far too many that have no business being near a weapon.
Yea but if you think about it, before he pulled a gun he wasn't the "garbage human being" he was just someone pissed off that someone that wasn't handicapped is parked in a handicapped spot, even though there was a bunch of other open spaces to park.
@Ezpzcz You could easily use the other side of the coin. It's better not to be obnoxious by being lazy parking in a handicapped spot cos you don't know who its going to piss off.
At the end of the day the victim in this scenario is the man that died. Not the guy in jail. So if lessons should be taught its teaching how to stay alive not "how to stay out of jail"
@Becky Clawson Becky, I suggest actually reading and putting your thinking cap on because the conversation we were having was a little more nuanced than that. I never said the outcome of this case was wrong.
@Christiaan Ingram that and the guy wasn’t even really fighting with him when he got shot. He backed away, literally walked backwards as soon as the guy fell to the ground. Had he not shot, it most likely would’ve been done and over with.
@jordan p I will gladly take over from @little loner and provide some statistics. "Gun violence was the leading cause of death for all children and teens ages 1-19 in 2018, surpassing motor vehicle accidents for the first time in history. Children and teens are far more likely to die from gunfire than COVID-19. In 2019, nine children and teens were killed with guns each day in America—one every 2 hours and 36 minutes." (Wisqars data from the CDC) To me, this seems enough information to change some beliefs regarding gun- safety. Also, I am not impressed by 'what ifs... scenarios', like the FBI one: "Our FBI has stated that somewhere between 200,000 to 2 million lives are saved each year by legally owned firearms used for self-defense." You just cannot know what would have happened if there was no firearm in the situation. That's why it is such a ridiculously broad range, they simply don't have a clue.
5 likes
jordan p2022-01-23 22:27:28 (edited 2022-01-23 22:27:44 )
@carmenl163 You do realize that those teens killed by gun violence are overwhelming teens in gangs the gun eachother down every single day. Gangs never aquire guns legally and a lot of the guns they use are already banned outright in the entire country. Try again because passing more laws will never remove that gun from situation considering the ridiculously large black market for firearms that already exists and regulating firearms more would increase the black market.
@carmenl163 Also even if it is a "ridiculously broad range" the bare minimum is still 200,000 every year which vastly outweighs the amount of deaths by firearms each year which over 60% is suicide and the deaths that aren't justifiable self defense cases are majority gang on gang violence. All you have to do is look at the statistics of one city, Chicago, to see how much gang violence adds to tally. You claim to provide statistics to backup your point but only provided one with absolutely zero context.
@bewing77 That’s where the term Dangerous Freedom comes into play. Everyone should be responsible with their actions equally , regardless of being armed and or able to defend oneself by hand. Peace and Grace.
@Anthony Dunkley If someone pushes you, that's not a fight. You enter the fight when you physically retaliate. You can always just walk away. Getting pushed does not "get you into a fight you didn't conscent to". If you get pummeled with no chance of escape, that is when you're in a fight you didn't consent to.
You are INCREDIBLY dismissive of MANY of the facts in every statement u make.. Would the matter be different if it was a 80 year old women that he pushed over??? or.. what if HE had died from the push?? Thousands die from what look like innocuous falls and scrapes on the daily!!! you down playing the violence that was propagated against this man is just as egregious as any statement made in FAVOR of the murderer..
Because he's a grey everyday unremarkable individual that behaved like the whole world owed him ? He placed more importance on himself than he was worth, thought he was special and above the law. A nuisance, and a quick-to violence one at that.
@ClydeJarrod37UK I agree he was a bit odd.. and yes.. he did seem to think he belonged in a cop uniform.. but i certainly think HE thought that he was innocent and had done nothing wrong.. my worst impression tho.. was when he was told the guy died.. if that was me.. i would have gone to absolute pieces.. he barely showed any emotion.. this is what convicted him for me!
@M. Diane Julie Benton You clearly don't understand what you are talking about. This is a vastly different case than the Ahmaud Arbery case was. You should be embarrassed for even making that comparassion . Also, call up any one of the lawyers in this trial. Provocation, as Chris and the dumb lady insinuated, is not what got Micahel Drejka convicted.
@Robu what got him convicted was that he murdered a man when he had other choices. You calling me names shows your lack of intelligence. In bother cases, the perpetrators thought that self-defense was their claim to being found not guilty. It was not.
@M. Diane Julie Benton I didn't call you a name. I said you should Be embarassed, which you should. There is no one size fits all of self defense. If you're going to just throw in recent high profile self defense cases you may as well throw in Rittenhouse and Thedore Edgecome, because they are all the same to you. No nuance to any of it right? All self defense claims are the same according to you.
Also, you're wrong again. What got him convicted wasn't "murdering a man when he had other choices. He very well could have had a lawyer put together a decent self defense case, but his insistence to the police he wasn't in fear of hisife is what screwed him over.
@Robu he had choices. He made an illegal choice. The same is true with the McMichaels and Bryan. Naming two cases does not mean I think all self defense cases are the same. Had Drejka chosen to have legal representation, lawyers may have been able to help him. But, there were witnesses, the video, and his actions in approaching others in a threatening manner. Like Travis, he probably would have not done well on a cross examination. Drejka is a danger to society and he is where he belongs. I have not followed nor plan to follow the Rittenhouse or Edgecomb cases, so I will not and have not commented on either. The two cases I have followed involved people who made the choice to initiate contact, provoke, and confront people who had been minding their own business. I’m both cases, if they were so concerned about an alleged violation of the law, they could have called the police. Instead they chose to take the law in their own hands. According to the outcomes in both cases, the judicial system found their actions and choices did not met the criteria of self defense. They provoked unarmed people and then wanted to say they feared for their lives. In both cases neither victim verbally threatened these criminals with words or a gun. Fear for your life has to meet certain legal standards. Drejka’s victim did push him and if he had been arrested, he may have been found guilty. However, a lawyer might argue that he was defending his family. But that should have been decided in court. BTW, I am not embarrassed nor is the woman you referred to dumb. If you think you know more than the the legal entities in the Drejka case, you should offer your insights. I was assaulted by an armed person who was unprovoked. I understand fear for my life and had to make choices.
@Robu your interpretation. We will never know if the victim was legally provoked because Drejka murdered him. Socially, most people will respond to protect their families from a verbal assault by a stranger. Drejka probably thought he was getting an aggressive freebie because the woman was alone with her small children. In the end, he is a coward. If he knew a McClockton existed in relation to this family, he would not have been so cavalier. As he said, he has never been in a fight, but he hides behind a gun. He is a convicted murderer no matter your legal interpretation. He legal claim if fear for his life did withstand the legal criteria of a reasonable person. The prosecutor spelled it out in the closing. In the end Drejka is a danger to society and is where he belongs as a convicted murderer who is also a coward. You can tell me that I don’t understand a 100 times. It does not change the legal facts. It seems you want to make him some sort of hero and victim when he is just a criminal.
@M. Diane Julie Benton I'm not trying to make Drejka out to be a "hero." Stop with that. Evey adult in this situation was an idiot and should have done things differently. That being said, you cannot provoke an attack from a person you don't know exists. You don't understand how this works legally. Explain to me, how one legally provokes an attack from somebody they don't see. Don't start with any of this "his family" bs that you were just going with. if you're going to sit here and grand stand by telling me I don't understand my profession. Explain legal provocation and it works in a self defense case in Florida.
You say things like, "He legal claim if fear for his life did withstand the legal criteria of a reasonable person" It didn't matter how a reasonable person would receive the incident because he admitted to the police he wasn't in fear. You don't understand the words you are saying.
@Robu you can have his admission as well as the reasonable person standard. If they followed your rationale, the prosecution could have simply read his statement to the police and called it a day. Yet, they had a full trial with evidence, witnesses, and a defense. I paraphrased the Florida prosecution’s closing statement about the reasonable person standard in response the the defense attorney’s argument to justify self defense. I am pretty sure he is quite familiar with the laws in his own state. The judge nor the defense stopped the prosecutor to correct him because he was right according to the laws of the state for which he worked. I understand quite well as did the jury.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Yes, obviously they had a trial that's how things work. I don't think the levels are here for us. You're clearly off in la la land if you think what I was saying was that's all they had to do show a line from his interrogation and there would be no trial. Now, no more skirting around the question. If we are going to continue, I need you to explain how I am wrong about provocation and how provocation works in a self defense case in Florida because you keep making these points to try and argue with reality but you refuse to expand on anything past a service level.
@Robu you seemed to miss the point. Your logic that he was he was found guilty because of his “confession” and that nothing else matters… your logic which might lead someone to think that you do not believe in a trial and how things are done.
I will humor your provocation criteria. if someone, a stranger, breaks into my house, i am provoked to act and defend myself. If someone assaults or verbally threatens or seems threatening to my neighbor, even if they do not know I exist, I am provoked ir give cause to act. If a stranger attempts to kidnap my child, I am provoked… that is, given cause to act even if they do not know me or that I exist. It doesn’t matter whether they know I exist, I can have justifiable cause to act. The crux of your argument seems to be that Drejka did not know the victim existed. It doesn’t matter whether he knew that McClockton existed. If you are walking down the street and you see a child, woman or older person being attacked verbally or physically, you might consider cause for action. Some people would and have. What might be seen as an impending threat can be a cause for action. You are suggesting that you would not…you consider it “bs”…eh, that is your view. However,a reasonable person might feel provoked to intervene. I do not care if you continue or not. You do not see your understand certain types of rhetoric. You do seem to think that you know more about Florida law than the prosecution, the defense, and the police. Interesting. In the end, a dangerous criminal (and a coward) is where he belongs.
@M. Diane Julie Benton No, you think you know Florida law better than they do because you are spouting nonsense. That's not how provocation works in a legal sense. And even if the push was provoked, which it wasn't, you are still allowed to defend yourself if the threat level rises to you reasonably fearing for your life. A conversation, even a heated one, does not rise to the level of provoking an attack from a third party. If, by your example, you see somebody yell at an old woman im the street and push the person yelling to the ground, you're more than likely getting charged with an assault. I'll reiterate again because you're getting it. You do not understand the words you are saying.
Agree for the most part. But i do have to say that him saying "neutralizing the threat" isnt a thing of him separating himself from the gravity of the situation. If youre getting robbed, and lets say you wrestle the gun out of the perpetrators hands and shoot him. You might feel completely justified. But someone could come up and say "Wow you just murdered a guy who has a wife and kids instead of giving him your wallet". You can always make whatever shooting, justified or unjustified, seem batshit insane. Clearly if he thought the law was on his side, he would take the "neutralizing a threat" instead of the "murdering a guy in front of his wife and kids" route. I dont think its nefarious.
@Robu LOL.. McClockton was not on trial. I said earlier that he might have been arrested if he had not been murdered. But his action were not enough for self defense on the part of Drejka. The evidence, video and witnesses, showed McClockton backing away. Retreating and not verbally threatening harm to Drejka. Nor did Drejka try to ascertain if he was a threat. According to the Florida police, prosecutors, judge, and jury, Drejka’s self defense claim did not meet the criteria of the Florida laws on self defense. What part of the Florida legal action don’t you understand. It was under the Florida system that he was this discussion convicted. It seems that you are not understanding the words. I have not changed my stance throughout discussion. I have repeated statements and because you are having difficulty, I have been more explicit. BTW, you know that Drejka wa doing more than just a yell at the woman and children. He was circling the car and behaving in what one might deemed as a threatening manner to total strangers. He felt entitled to do so and emboldened because he was armed with a gun. Here was this seemingly defenseless woman with her small children. I know that you think that is bs…maybe you do not have children. I might have stepped at 5’2” and at 72 years to confront him on behalf of this family. More than likely, I would have stepped in to tell him to leave them alone. But, in the end, Drejka was proven to be a murderer and threat to society. He is where he belongs. I know, according to you, I do not understand my words. You are hilarious and feel so entitled that you are right that you ignore the Florida judgment.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Well yeah, it's hard to put somebody on trial when they are dead. You say you haven't change your position but your position is nothing. My original comment on here was correcting Chris' misunderstanding of provocation and you less eloquently continued the trend of not understanding how it works. I'm a lawyer this is my field of expertise. I'm telling you you don't understand what you're talking about. You're taking bits and pieces you midly comprehend and are spewing them out. Which somehow you are conflating that with making a cogent point.
@Robu I doubt you are a lawyer. You cannot seem to understand the Florida law as presented in this case. You certainly don’t understand what the Florida prosecutor argued on the reasonable person standards l, his words, not mine. You fail to address his argument during the closing of the case. Attacking my character and my linguistic and cognitive abilities seems to be your best tactic which is truly sad for you. I have worked with many lawyers as have friends who are lawyers. I do not believe you are a practicing attorney.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Explain provocation then and how it works in a self defense case. You can sit here and say the prosecutor said all you want you don't understand what you are saying. Stop beating around the bush and explain. Shut me up by proving me wrong.
@Robu you will keep just keep ranting like a William Faulkner character. you, like some failed rhetoricians or alleged rhetoricians, keep changing your claim and supporting evidence. You can keep ranting. I have explained it more than once. I have pointed to experts from Florida since you claim is based on Florida law. I do find your rants amusing. In many ways you are like your friend Drejka. He is a bully trying to make others bend to his will because he believed he was the only one who was right. Your claim about provocation is not logical. You can rant all you want.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Diane, Julia, whatever your name is. You're choosing to be ignorant at this point. You don't understand provocation from a legal stance. Please contact one of those many lawyers you know and get back to me. The fact you keep insinuating that I am for what Drejka did just shows how the nuance of the conversation was lost on you.
@Robu dear, dear…you have yet to explain provocation from a legal standpoint. I do not have to call upon my lawyer friends. I will take the words of the Florida lawyers. It is interesting that you refuse. I will keep saying that in the end, it doesn’t matter. The Florida legal system has spoken and Drejka is where he belongs. Your ranting will not change that. Rant on Robu…rant on
@M. Diane Julie Benton I very much explained to you that you can't reasonably provoke a third party you don't know exists, especially not one that has no idea what is going on. You then went on a rant about women, children, and the elderly despite none of them getting special provocation privileges.
@Robu your explanation is wrong; it is not logical; it is simplistic and can certainly be argued in court. It certainly can be argued in court . McClockton was provoked when he say his family under what he probably believed was a verbal attack on his family. He is not a third party to use your premise. Was he justified based on this provocation would have been decided in court if he had not been murdered. I know you will continue because you want to be right but you are not. You ignore what the Florida court decided or inferred even though you initially used Florida law as your evidence for your position. But rant on…
@Robu Gee, Robu, you are misrepresenting what McClockton did and what I said about the high possibility that he would have been arrested. Something I said more than once. So, when you are wasting your time and the time of your colleagues with lies about what position I took, and what McClockton actually did, make sure you show them unedited copies of our dialogue. Not only will they see what I said and your misrepresentation but your attack on my character and unnecessary cursing. You are doing a good job of representing yourself and your colleagues. I doubt you have what it takes to be that honest with them or yourself. I would actually love to be there when you have this conversation with them. Watching their embarrassment would be amusing.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Should I include all of the times you called Markeis McGlockton "McClockton" or would you rather I clean it up a bit to make it look like you aren't completely clueless?
@Robu if you are so petty to be distracted by a typo…go for it. I will find it even more amusing. It does not change your misrepresentation one iota, a far mor egregious act than a typo.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Well no, typo would be how you just spelled more without the e. You called him the wrong name over and over again that's not a typo. If we're being honest though, the rampant misuse of ellipsis bothers me much more than you not knowing his name or your misunderstanding of provocation.
@Robu please share your concerns about my typo or misspelling and my habit of using the ellipsis. Again, I will be amused while your colleagues read your comments to me…the unwarranted attacks and cursing (oops, another pesky ellipsis). Your misrepresentation of McClockton’s actions as well as my position should interest them. Again, I doubt you will follow through.
I think it is fair to say that the shooter's actions leading up to the shooting are indefensible. Common sense dictates that angrily yelling at strangers in public is a bad idea.
@Robu did you share your comments as well? Did they give you a pat on the back with a good job Robu? Misrepresenting yourself again? You have a bad habit of not being truthful. Why would anyone want to work next to such a rude liar?
Probably the same reason many of Us Are angrier... This was an Unnecessary murder !!! NOT a good enough reason, no motive, just stupidity,maybe even racism on His part... I think pointing the gun was sufficient enough that stopped the fight... This is even scarier of a situation because it was just a random murder...
@Robu Again, why anyone would want with a firm that hired you? I never claimed to be a lawyer. I just pointed out some facts and observations that are part of the public record. That seemed to trigger a hissy-fit on your part devolving into misrepresentations and attacks. If your colleagues are gullible enough to believe you, I have to wonder about your firm. Keep prattling about whatever you are allegedly doing.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Gullible enough to believe what DJB? I earned my PD. From where I'm sitting, you're the one who threw a "hissy fit" when they failed to understand the nuance of the conversation and prattled on about things they don't fully comprehend.
@Robu gullible enough to believe your misrepresentation of McClockton’s actions and my actual words. I do not know whether you earned a PD or why it matters. You are not truthful and you engage in character attacks to make your points. Your hissy-fits about typos or misspelled words and the ellipsis and the Florida prosecutor’s discussion of provocation in this case. No one had said McClockton should have pushed Drejka but he did not do it on a whim. But that is neither here or there. McClockton was not on trial. We do know that if you were in the store and your wife and children were in the car and someone came in said a man was yelling at a woman and her children, you would do nothing because what is the big deal. You would not be provoked; you would be okay. That is your right. Others would be. The legal system in Florida recognized that others might be. No one said it was legal, just that it was understandable. It was not that McClockton was found innocent but the Drejka started this series of events and is responsible for the outcome, McClockton. You don’t need to be a lawyer to understand. You believe you are the only capable of understanding. You are not. You even refer to “they” I expect you will continue.
@M. Diane Julie Benton DJB, I believe there are many people capable of understanding a simple concept. I believe you are too you are just choosing not to. You still don't even care enough to say the man's name right. Stop being disprectful to the dead.
Also, my wife would never get into a shouting match over a parking spot. Nor would I let her sit in a parking lot by herself, so I will never be in this situation. If I was, I wouldn't run out of the store and attack a guy.
Exactly if ur gonna be the type a person to get crazy over a handicap spot then u know this guy causes a fuss over small stupid shit and if he gets pushed it’s license to kill wtf hell no
@Robu It certainly was not my intent to be disrespectful to Mr. McGlockton, my error. At the same time, I am not choosing to ignore any simple concept because it is not simple but complex under varying circumstances which the legal system considered if you listen to the questions the police asked the defendant nuanced as they were, and the points the prosecutor raised in questioning and in his closing. I am also sure you care about your wife and, if for some reason, she chose to wait in the car and someone came into your location to say a man was yelling at a woman, you would go check. I too would not engage in a shouting match with anyone. That is maturity. Everyone responds differently to verbal attacks and what they may view as threatening behavior. In the end, Drejka is where he belongs. There is no need to belittle me and my intelligence or attack my character because we disagree and have different perspectives. There is no need to misrepresent what I have claimed or not claimed. Nor, is there any need to misrepresent Mr. McGlockton’s actions. That is even more disrespectful than spelling his name with a C rather than a G.
@M. Diane Julie Benton DJB, I'll start this message off nicely for you and we can find some common ground. I agree that Drejka deserves to in prison. You not agreeing with me on how provocation is applied as a legal concept dose not mean I think l he is a good guy or wasn't in the wrong. It isn't also isn't disrespectful to review the actions of Markeis McGlockton, because had he approach things differently he would be alive today. You have people in this comment section saying that his pushing Drejka is what a "real man" would do. Thats a dangerous social contruct that leads to incidents like this. Had Markeis' girlfriend ignored Drejka, drove away, said, " I'm sorry, I didn't see the sign" the shooting, most likely, dosnt happen. Her essentially threatening Drejka with "wait till my man gets here." Didn't help the situation.
Exceptionally said, OP! I will just say, as a guy who carries legally daily, I actually am even more studious about avoiding confrontations because of that. Deadly force is only legal (and moral) when either an innocent bystander or I am in danger of death or serious bodily injury, and the problem with confrontations is that they can all too easily escalate into something far worse than a shove to the pavement. None of this would have happened if this guy hadn't decided to play junior parking enforcer, but once he made that mistake and angered the husband of the woman he was berating into shoving him to the pavement, he should have just cut his losses and apologized for his own boorish behavior and let things deescalate.
@Anthony Dunkley I do agree, you shouldn’t just take it when someone is attacking you. It didn’t seem that he would have been in the position of accepting being in a fight he didn’t consent to. This guy was looking for a fight.
Handguns are supposed to be the ultimate equalizer when it comes to combat situations but they really aren’t. They just push people to get into confrontations they otherwise would not have gotten into if they are unarmed. People will start arguments because they know they are armed; they are automatically willing to use it as well because they are armed. There has to be some kind of rules and regulations regarding guns and deadly force. It’s a good thing we had video evidence in this case but the fact that he felt entitled to use deadly force to equal being pushed speaks to how bad the situation really is.
You cannot use deadly force because you were pushed. You can’t use deadly force because someone threatened you. You can’t use deadly force just because you saw someone with a firearm. Even the states that don’t have a “duty to retreat” place restrictions on when you can use deadly force or not. You can only use proportional force; force equal to that of the initial aggressor. You can’t go around executing people because they punched you in most situations either. I guess some of the people in this very thread don’t know these things.
Backseat he got off with less than 5 years for a remorseless killing that easily could've been avoided. You got pushed and escalated a shove to actual murder
@Christiaan Ingram want to watch your back all you want, any good lawyer will use that quote to pin any "self defense" as a predetermined murder, like this guy deserves. Yes he got pushed, that doesn't equal deadly weapon. Self defense in this case is a joke this guy is a heartless killer
@Bojang Bugami You clearly have no idea how the law works. The self defense claim was there for Drejkas lawyers to make. Courts aren't about feelings they are about facts. Once you get out off middle you can back and try again.
@Robu Haha! YOU'RE an attorney! What area of law do you specialize in? It must have been trolling because you seem particularly gifted in that regard. 😄
@Augusta Septemberova you made an excellent point that a lot of people just overlook...pushing someone down isn't "fighting".
Think of it this way, if the victim had punched Drejka instead of pushing him that's an entirely different scenario. Pushing someone is battery. Punching someone is ASSAULT and battery.
I don't think that justifies a lethal response, but at least he'd have more of a case.
@Christiaan Ingram Why you looking to retain me? I started out as a criminal defense attourney and after years of that I left the firm I was at and stated primarily focusing on estate planning. Infinitely easy and pays better.
@Robu obviously it matterrd he’s in prison . you clearly don’t have a permit probably an open carry fool . gun class 101 you can not provoke an altercation and then claim self defense! you started a fight with a gun ..
@Robu this isn't a courtroom The factors youre erasing carry obvious significance in the moral world. This is real life. The significance of these factors is instantly comprehensible to reasonable people.
@D D L What in the world are you on about? "This isn't a court room" We're talking about committing and being convicted of a crime. Do you understand how the legal system works? There's a court involved in that buddy. With lawyers who make arguments for and against you.
Also, yes, when you walk out of a store and all you see is a man next to your car, a reasonable person dosnt assume that man needs to be assaulted.
I feel like he wouldnt have pulled the gun if the guy didnt get aggressively physical. In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it. If he got physical then the guy would wanna get back at him harder, which is shooting the gun. Theres no equal revenge at that point.
@Robu well you know that is not all that was going on. 'A man standing next to a car' lol C'MON 😂! C'MON, GUY !
AND I AGREE with you ! IT WAS ABSOLUTELY UNREASONABLE to barrel over and push the rude guy down The man who was out of the blue out there hollering at your sweetheart and the 2 toddlers Making a terrible commotion ! It was hotheaded and atrocious to race over and shove him ! It was rash ! A customer had just rushed in to raise the alarm that a woman was out there in an altercation he was concerned for her safety he and the 5 year old could hear the hollering some guy going to TOWN on a Mom and 2 tiny toddlers when you'd left them moments ago sitting peacefully in your car minding their own business safe snd sound while you and 5 year old big brother dash in to grab some snacks for the family on a beautiful day like a million times before a family outing a beautiful day and - what? A msn is going crazy out there
He raced over and pushed the guy! Bad move! Because the guy WAS a volatile grenade with a long string of road rage and other offenses with a yen for going after people in cars and threatenig them with guns going after WOMEN in cars Certainly if he had groveled and apoeased and deescalated and validated the outragious strange man's ego apologized and smoothed the waters and made peace at all costs he might have escaped with his life !
If he hadn't been the one this gu6 went after who taken the bait and used his hands instead of an apoeasing he might not have been executed without mercy in front of his sweetheart and 3 precious kids for doing something we learn is a nono in preschool.. The killer shared that he then whipped around to see if the woman needed to be shot too and then decided nobody else needed to be shot and coolly set his gun aside and waited for the law to arrive confident he had done everything just right while she wailed in her grief and the little children were yrapoed in the car and he was annoyed by all this inexplicable noisy yelling about "' the kids! The kids!" NO HUMAN CONNECTION. NONR. JUST SATISFACTION. . HE PICKED YET ANOTHER OF MANY FIGHTS THAT HE USED HIS GUN TO DOMINATE AND HE WON THIS ONE WITH HIS GUN THE HARD WAY. This is a human story, not solely a legal lesson. This is a story with many lessons, moral, legal, survival... If only both men had been more wirried about everyone's safety than Right and Wrong and not being or letting dear ones BE DISTESPECTED AND DEGRADES. if they had been more concerned with SAFETY than with RIGHTING WRONGS here maybe a relatable hotheaded dispute over principles wouldnt have ended in unspeakable tragedy. If only either man - and the mama bear there - had been quick to self- humble in the face of the slap in the face of shocking unpleasant provocation if only all 3 or even Any of the 3 had reacted to being challenged by rising above that feeling of having their buttons pushed by a Bully by apoeasing the bully Apologizing. Retreating. Making Peace at all costs if only their kneejerk reaction to what was percieved as disrespect was to be instantly humble, salf-effacing respectful and conciliatory If they had put their Pride aside the victim might be alive today and well the killer would probably still be out there going after people since he was a volatile repeat offender - a powderkeg ac- horror or incarceration just waiting to happen, but maybe he'd still be at least outside and free to treasure his blessed life with his own dear ones and his two beautiful dogs.
@D D L No, that's not all that was going on, but Markeis McGlockton wasn't privy to any thing that was going on. You cant say Drejka provoked Markeis when Drejka didn't know he existed and Markeis didn't know anything about what was going on. For all he knew, Drejka was a third party checking on his wife after the argument. Markeis heard there was an argument outside, walked out there, and then attacked a man who was next to his car. He had no reason to believe that Drejka was a danger to him or his family. It wasn't until Drejka pulled out his gun that Markeis back away from him. Until he started going for the gun, Markies was standing over Drejka. He is 100% justified in pulling iut the gun.
The argument was there to make that Drejka reasonably believed the attack wasn't over. Whether the jury would buy it or not is another story.
0 likes
D D L2022-02-20 22:38:26 (edited 2022-02-20 22:47:27 )
@Robu ah... i see what you mean.. about the chance of some mistaken-identity fluke.. He Wasn't wrong, but its a point. I agree that the men. And MamaBear too were all rising to passionately champion PRINCIPLES and put their sense of commitment to Righting Wrong above that of seeking to protect physical safetyat all costs. And it couldbbe argued that all 3 felt it was incumbent upon them to step up to Bulkying and STOP thr bullying in its tracks. I agree with that arguably the father the killer killed was CHAMPIONING his sweetheart and toddlers agaist bullying or degradation more than protecting them from a volatile deadly threat - and if hed known what a deadly threat it was he might have handled the confrontation much more cautiously the hothead had been repeatedly a hairsbreath away from a fatal shooting in numerous roadrage altercations he'd dominated with his gun they might have swallowed their Pride and apologized and attempted to placate and appease him at all costs, even groveled , and given him his satisfaction. You are right - While if the family perceived the killer as an unstable deadly threat they were certainly RIGHT - they arguably didn't perceive the extreme danger they were in well enough until it was too late As you said, the slain man rushed over to the man who had been hollering at his sweethesrt and 2 tiny children and pushed him down before backing off. Then he was shot to death by the angry man in front of the woman and small children he'd tried to stand up for. Arguably, they didn't expect this. Arguably. they presumed that confronting this bully would be a self-affirming lesson in the value of standing up for yourself and your loved ones and not a trap door to a horrible sudden death Of Course we are taught we use our words and not our hands. - or our force multipliers - to resolve non~deadly disputes - by the time we are schoolchildren weve been taught the wholesome lesson that solving a problem by rushing over and Pushing others is a NoNo. Like you said -- Drawing the gun, arguably reasonable - it was the killer's judgement in pulling that trigger that was horribly flawed
[.i know i sound like a douche as i try to muddle through this -- 😆- I'm doing other things and keep getting pulled away and distracted so I'm just giving up and posting this trash just to get back to real life so sorry for all the flaws 🤓😆]
@D D L See, I like you. Obviously in a perfect world all three adults in this situation acted differently. I don't think Drejka is a good guy, but many people on here are conflating morality with the law. I didn't come her to champion Drejka. The entire point of my initial comments were about the misunderstanding of how provocation is applied.
@Oritsu A person in his position and seeing what he was seeing might not 'clearly know' an aggressor taking several steps back did not want or intend to to 'do those - or other - things' such as drawing his own weapon and shooting. But contraints to pulling the trigger dont require it to be CLEAR lthat the aggressor IS NO THREAT AT ALL. UNLESS it is Clear the aggressor DOES present a deadly threat you don't pull that trigger. That's My Understanding. r But this killer EXPLAINED HIS OWN THOUGHT PROCESS and justifications AT THE TIME and IN HIS OWN WORDS and as he stated them they fell short of rising to the level required for a finding of justifiable homicide.
But a man speaking to your girlfriend in the wrong tone justifies aggravated assault? Justice isn't blind, but people sure are. Both the victim and the shooter in this are idiots. Live by idiotic uneeded violence and die by it too. I dont think the shooting was justified but when you start a conversation with violence you don't get to cry when the person you attacked has the capacity to be more violent. The same way OP claimed that the shooter should have accepted that him using words somebody else might not like could escalate to him getting physically hurt as consequence for starting a verbal confrontation. The shooting victim has to accept the consequence that for starting a physical confrontation without ever saying a word.
@Annabella LeForce might have been looking for a fight but he didn't start it in this instance. Other guy cheap shotted him, and that's when the violence started so at that point self defense was justified except in this case it wasn't self defense. So a guy thinking he's a big shot doesn't justify someone putting their hands on him
@Anthony Dunkley I don’t think he was justified for pushing him. He took the fight onto another level but, there was a fight that was already started at that point.
@Michael Lamb right, cause if someone makes physical contact with you in the slightest, you have every right to murder them. Sounds to me like you're itching for a opportunity, and given that you admitted you beat people until they didn't get up, I'm getting the feeling you're the exact kind of person you want to protect yourself against. A person who believes that they have the right to kill another person, nah. Inalienable right to life, you don't get to just take a life and get away with that shit (Nor should you) regardless of circumstances.
Beating someone’s ass (victimizing them) for being antagonistic is also highly illegal. Why do people start physical violence over arguments or being insulted? This guy committed crime of assault then the subject of the video committed the crime of retaliating with deadly force when he wasn’t in fear of his life. He should have used the gun as a tool to get the other guy to back down. You can point the gun and give commands to back off etc and you have a very strong self defense case. The perp should have given the Man opportunity to back off and wait for police. You can’t shoot until the attacker continues to move towards you in a violent/threatening manner after you have produced the firearm. This creates legal fear for your life because if the attacker manages to disarm you they can then kill you with your own gun.
I’m trying to say that both of the men in this altercation committed crimes. Both played stupid games and won stupid prizes. If someone is having a verbal altercation it is always best to attempt at de escalation before resorting to physical means. If you go for violence just know there may be a violent retaliation. And if you are an armed citizen it is IMPERATIVE that you learn the laws and understood rules around firearm ownership. It is a HEAVY responsibility. Do not take it lightly. And do not shoot someone that is backing away from you for fucks sake.
In all seriousness although the dude was 100 guilty, that didn’t stop the POS who without physical provocation to push him all ghetto like. An eye for an eye.. and before anyone pathetic gets ancy… his culture reflected his actions… I mean intimidate someone obviously taking smack but you condemning solely the dude who brought a piece out is kind of ironic given the fact the same can be said for anyone retaliating back with force…you yourself don’t know who’s armed….
@Looking 4 Things if that is what you think is appropriate in a man then I hope your partner doesn’t end up like the victim here. He pushed an older, smaller man in the back with as much force as he could muster onto concrete. He didn’t deserve to be murdered but it was a cowardly and stupid thing to do imo. You can de-escalate or stand up for yourself or your family but it’s just common sense to leave room for the other person to retreat while retaining some pride.
@David Ng Your protective instincts are lacking. If you're truly an honest person show this to your partner and ask if he or she feels safe with you. I happen to have 5 brothers and one sister and we were raised a very different way when it's a man against a woman.
Lol you’re rambling; it’s absolutely Hilarious thst you blame the victim instead of blaming the aggressor; you then go on to to play the what if game; what if he shot an innocent bystander; if you knew what you were talking about you would see that no one is behind the aggressor when the shot was fired; the children were also in the car 🤦♂️ I’m assuming the aggressor hefted the other child in the store; because the Narrator says the aggressor took a child in the store; you’re also slandering the victim he didn’t murder anyone it’s as clear as day the shooter was attacked un provoked
@Christiaan Ingram lol the victim was the shooter smh 🤦♂️ the victim was “minding his own business “ smh it’s sad when the victim was physically attacked clear as day unprovoked . &. Not one of you blame the aggressor
@Drdrjr hmm maybe we think its a good idea because two years ago I was able to prevent myself from being carjacked. Guy pulled a knife and told me to open the door. I pulled my pistol from the holster in my door and he turned and ran. I didn't have to shoot anybody. But I was able to protect myself and my children. Why do you want to take that ability away from me? Why do you think people should be at the mercy of criminals? Are you a criminal and just don't want to have to deal with innocent people defending themselves?
@umungus I think that the opportunity to defend yourself like that is a great thing. However I also believe guns cause way more harm than mercy. I could compare it to nuclear weapons. If one country produces nuclear weapons, other countries have to do it too, in order to put things in a stalemate. However it is far from likely that a stalemate like that will last forever. It would be much safer if no country had nuclear weapons in the same way that it would be safer to prevent people from getting their hands on guns.
@Drdrjr i would totally agree with you, unfortunately statistics here in the US completely prove you wrong. The amount of crimes stopped by legal gun owners far outweighs the crimes committed with guns. Gun safety should be taught in schools, the gun laws for each state should be drilled into kids heads. The problem is nobody wants to have an actual discussion about the issue here in the US. There are two sides, either ban all guns or dont ban any. Neither side is willing to budge. You also have to consider how the US was formed, why it was formed, and what the second amendment was created for. Not only was it created so that each person has the right to defend themselves but also to prevent governments from abusing the people. Whats the first thing every dictator does when they come to power? They immediately disarm the population. Let me ask you this, do you agree with the Ukrainian government arming citizens to fight Russia?
@umungus Absolutely, but it is a complete different situation. The Russians are entering Ukrainian land and are killing civilians. It would be stupid not to arm the people. Guns in every day life however can turn a petty crime, a misunderstanding or an argument, into death. At the same time I agree with some of your points. It’s unfortunate that guns are the choice of solution in America. I live in Sweden where the system works much better in my opinion. There are better solutions than guns.
@Drdrjr no its not. See thats one of the reasons we have the second amendment. Its not different at all. Those Ukrainians would be much better off had they been allowed to own those weapons, learn how to properly use them, fire them at ranges. The fact that you think its a seperate issue shows how little you understand about the issue. When I say everyone should have the right to defend themselves I dont just mean in certain situations against certain people. I mean against any threat foreign or domestic. Imagine how much better those Ukrainians would be able to defend their homes if they had experience with those weapons. Imagine how much more quickly they would have been able to respond to the threat if they were allowed to own those weapons. Do you think putin would have thought twice about invading if he knew most Ukrainians had weapons to fight him and had experience using them? The answer is yes he would have. Good thing people like you made sure putin didn't have to worry about that. How is defending their lives, their loved ones and their homes any different to defending their lives, their loved ones and their homes? The only thing that differs in this scenario is its a foreign force invading and not a couple of criminals breaking into your house. Either you support the right to have a gun to defend yourself or you dont. Gun safety should be taught in schools. Why do you not advocate for the banning of cars? Cars kill more people than guns do. Often because someone is driving recklessly but I dont see you calling for cars to be banned. Why is that?
@umungus Clearly we have different opinions on the matter. To me there is a difference being able to defend yourself and owning a gun. The Ukrainian people are arming themselves because they are under attack. Arming yourself just in case you ever are under attack is a different thing. People like you might be able to realize when, and when not to use the gun. The problem is that some people are going to misbehave. An example of that is this case, where an innocent life was taken. In an ideal world having the possibility for people to fully defend themselves whilst also making sure that no unnecessary damage is done is possible. But not in reality. Making sure that guns don’t get in the wrong peoples hands is hard and is clearly not working.
@Looking 4 Things The irony of you saying I'm not a lawyer all because I'm talking about the legal defense of somebody you don't like isn't lost on me.
@Looking 4 Things It's crazy. It's almost like I can do my job and take 30 seconds to send a message every few days. I do love your continued attempts to make it seem like this is some monumental task that takes hours to come write up a reply.
@Looking 4 Things One, weird flex saying I wont make it in prison. I'm sure its a world you're very familiar with. I don't commit crimes though so we're good on that front.
Two, "left the firm" is actually code for I stopped doing criminal work and started my own smaller practice where I do various things relating to contracts. Once again, weird that you want to project your sad life onto me and make assumptions about my personal relationships with my coworkers.
@Robu You should know your legal claims just don't ring true. Why do you care so much that strangers on youtube people you will never meet believe you? Something to think about.
to me is because the murderer is white and the victims were poc and he thought is actions would be justified for that reason alone. There's another one where the murderer, again a middle aged white man, indiscriminately shoots at 3 young black men because they were playing loud music again in a store parking lot. That one makes me so mad too!
@Little Loner "the ones that are emotionally and mentally stable"! 😂 then noone here not even cops should own guns!! People eat antidepressants for breakfast!
@Looking 4 Things Well they do because that's how the law works and I don't care if you believe it or not. Why do you care so much I'm correcting people on the law?
@Michael Lamb Your response is exactly why "Stand Your Ground" is a bad idea. You and I are the same when it comes to this: we're grown men not looking to pick fights with anyone.
We're also not going to let someone just come up and assault us.
We differ in the use of deadly force.
I was in a CVS a while back, when one of the customers started causing problems. He was disruptive to the point where the rest of us asked him to leave.
Well another customer took the initiative to start pushing him out the door and they start fighting. I went to try and break it up. The disruptive guy was younger, bigger and stronger than me. He pushed me off of him so forcefully my glasses flew off my face and I was on my ass. I was fine. I got up, found my glasses and helped break up the fight. I bought my stuff and went home. No one died. I'm not in prison. Dozens of lives aren't destroyed forever. I guess you would have just started shooting and let the chips fall where they may....
@Christiaan Ingram There's a lot more nuance to my thought process than you're gonna get in a YouTube comment section and I hope that would be the case for everyone.
It's just simple to me in the aspect of keep your hands to yourself. Words are just that and while they might be offensive or even terrible they aren't justification to put hands on anyone. If things have gotten to the point of someone assaulting me there is a problem as I'm going to respond accordingly. I don't want to hurt anyone but if I have to I will so I don't get hurt and I can make it home to my family. I'm also not going to assault someone walking away.
I've seen and been thru some things that have made my attitude the way it is. I got into a fight in my mid 20s with someone who was high on something in my place of business. I went about things correctly until he swung on me at which point we fought and once he was on the ground I stopped and called the police. Literally as I was on the phone with the police the guy had found a pipe and hit me in the back of my head and after I dropped continued to hit me. I got hit in the head a couple more times but not as solid and he cracked two of my ribs. I have permanent hearing and vision loss (I already wore glasses so definitely didn't need that) to go along with the seizures that I still suffer from occasionally all thanks to that. This is why if I get into an altercation I won't stop until the other person is immobile. I have 3 kids and a wife that need me to make it home.
Also I own one gun and it's at my home 90% of the time. The only time it's on me is when I go out of town for business and I'm in unfamiliar areas. I don't feel the need to carry it around but at least here in Florida people expect you to be carrying so they at least think before they do stupid things. That's why I believe there should be stand your ground.
This case is not stand your ground. This guy is an asshole that was looking for problems. The guy who assaulted him was walking away. They guy had no right to do that but he shouldn't have died for it. Gone to jail a couple days yes but not die.
Breaking up a fight is a different thing altogether. If I'm doing that I know I'm doing it to try to create peace and I also expect to get pushed and possibly punched in that situation. That's a completely different scenario.
So with all that said yes I stand by what I said but there is much more nuance to it. I just want to live my life peacefully. There needs to be something in place to stop people like this guy that thinks you can just shoot over anything and also something to stop people like the guy that pushed him which was also not okay. Not on the same level of not okay obviously but still not okay. Everything about this situation was wrong especially with the guy who committed the murder.
@Christiaan Ingram Thank you. I read my first comment and realized that it came across aggressive and extreme. I don't want to promote violence. Have a great day and stay safe out there!
Based on the order of events he started the conversation with the woman, the victim had no reason to push him and if he had not fired a shot he would be able to sue the victim. The fight was started by the victim and he is not blameless in this. However his response to being shoved was way more than equal force.
he doesn't have to be in fear for his life, at all, only if he believes he is at risk of serious bodily harm. He was at risk weather he understands it or not, and should have been found not guilty.
@Anthony Dunkley Simple as this: You don't bring a gun to a fist fight... Even if the person initiated the first punch or shove in this case. It seems as though you're more focused on the fact that the other dude pushed the guy who was next to their girl's car instead of the fact that the actual instigator had walked up to the defendants car and proceeded to harass them over a parking spot he had no right to enforce. Either leave it to the police so they can handle the situation and/or get written up or charged for unlawful use of a firearm, or you ignore it and mind your own business like the one guy shown in the footage who darted to the right to avoid any such confrontation.
@Robu how do you say that he had no knowledge of it when there were literally witnesses in the store that said they could hear shouting outside between a man and women. Then he walks out and see the man having some of conversation or alterncation with his girl, I'm pretty sure most people are smart enough to put two and two together
@Anthony Dunkley ah yes, because pushing someone to the ground because they seem to be threatening someone you love is the same thing as aiming a shot and shooting that person because you are mad that you got consequences for something you started
@jeremy pool How do you know the man isn't an innocent bystander who stopped to help? When McGlockton walked out of that gas station he didn't know what was going on. His presumption of what was going on wasn't reality and it certainly didn't justify him pushing Drejka to the ground.
@Robu it did, but ok. I'm pretty sure if you hear two people shouting and then the same two people when you walking at still having some sort of heated conversation, it's pretty easy to put two and two together. As a supposed lawyer, you would think that you would think of an actual rebuttal to that argument since it would actually be an argument used in court by either a witness or even the prosecutor
@jeremy pool This is where you're wrong. You wouldn't be allowed to say what the state of mind of McGlockton was in court. There is no way to prove what He saw or perceived. That's why you said. "Pretty sure. Nobody knows. The way you would argue it in court would be through the testimony of witnesses surrounding the intial confrontation and possibly even your expert testimony and let the jury assume.
But please, go on and tell me more about how somebody would argue the state of mind of another in court.
@Robu it's really funny you say that when there are literally witnesses that could tell you his facial expressions and video evidence of his expression and how he was acting. So we don't actually have to guess what his state of mind was and we do in fact know what his state of mind was
@jeremy pool No, see once again you don't understand how this works. The things a witness would be testifying to are extraneous details that you are going to use to fit your narrative. You don't get to have the clerk come up and say, "Yes, McGlockton heard noise and was told something. So he went outside and thought there was a threat to his wife." That's not how it works.
If you start a VERBAL altercation / argument - you NEVER SHOULD have to expect "to get your ass kicked" - so PHYSICALLY attacked. THAT thinking shows how wrong your perception of human interaction is. NEVER should ONLY words be the reason for a physical attack.
In contrast to that - if you START a brawl, YOU should epxect that this can escalate up o the use of leathal force. Thats why the black guy would have been charged if the gun would have not been pulled out. Assaulting someone is a crimal act. A verbal argument is not (expect insulting etc.)
The reason this guy went to jail is because the "attacker" is stepping back and there is a delay between pulling the gun and shooting.
I agree generally speaking, but I completely think your values are twisted if you believe it to be reasonable that, if you approach anyone and verbally have an exchange about something they're doing that's against the law, you should "accept the fact you might get your ass kicked". That is some BS right there, that goes against every facet of the concept of freedom. What the victim in this case did was completely and utterly despicable. It is absolutely NOT acceptable for someone to silently approach an unsuspecting person who's having a verbal, sufficiently distant exchange with anyone including the family, to come out of nowhere and blindside knock him to the curb, and you know he was still approaching him UNTIL he saw the gun coming out, just look at the footage. There's no telling what he was going to do if he didn't see the gun, but it is clear that he was displaying physical superiority over the killer and up to that point was using brute force to injure and dominate a weaker person 'to solve an argument' just like you posited the other person used his gun. Is it more despicable to shoot the perpetrator after he backs off at the sight of the weapon and clearly retreats? YES. The killer was more despicable in his actions and the way he justifies them. That does not mean you should condone anything that the deadbeat sob did BEFORE he unfairly was robbed of his life. In fact what the poor dead guy did - I feel horrible for his kids - was highly criminal and should not have been expected, much less accepted by anyone who simply has a verbal argument with another person whether they were the one to confront the other first or not. It is very concerning when that has become the kind of values that America lives by, because it perpetuates the normalization of physical violence as a reasonable response; the very thing you're contradicting yourself with by condemning it later.
@jeremy pool This is only reasonable when the consequences are reasonable. And being assaulted for talking to someone, is not reasonable. That's normalizing violent behaviour.
@The Lone Wanderer The point you're arguing about provocation actually works much better when you use it for the case of the shooter. Being blindsided and thrown to the curb by a large stranger is much more provocative in terms making someone act rashly in 'self defense' than seeing someone argue from a safe distance verbally with no matter whom, and he took much more time quietly walking over to him before throwing him off his feet. So neither of us are really arguing that either defense should be accepted, but it strikes me that you use the 'provocation' argument only in favor of the aggressive dad and not the killer.
@Johnny Natrium I didn't mean to argue either way in terms of provocation, only on the basis that provocation, both physical and not, is a legal concept.
You can really argue provocation either way, like what you said. But to say that Person A was provoked by Person B after Person B was provoked by Person A might not logically follow.
@Anthony Dunkley the other guy pushed him first, because he was getting aggressive with the man's girlfriend. The victim didn't just walk up and push him. He did what other men are supposed to do when a fellow man gets aggressive with the woman he loves. Point is, he had no business shouting at that woman over a parking violation. Period.
makes me wonder the cops' intentions when they are interrogating this guy. I feel like they are pushing for the guy to incriminate himself rather than trying to find out what exactly happened after the guy had clearly shown that he was willing to cooperate. I think they should have shown him the video and have him explain what happened as events transpired.
@FallenAngel true, I don't know much about interrogation, but in my opinion, these cops were framing their questions to get a narrative that was convenient to them.
@Sereti Lee The whole point of not showing video evidence or any incriminating evidence against him is to catch him in a lie. Even though he was cooperating he was willing to change the narrative to try to make himself look less guilty. The video showed other wise and that helps the prosecution have an stronger case.
@Sereti Lee Race has nothing to do with it. This guy just has an inferiority complex and fell powerful while carrying a gun. Remember he has taken his gun out to intimidate five or four other people before he killed this man.
@Sereti Lee Regarding how interrogations work... I think a key word here is "suspect". The police try to find "suspects", who the police "suspect" of doing something. I hope that may help in understanding how the police operates.
Anyway, I kind of think that the police should find the truth. But at the end of the day, they really just do try to get damning evidence or even confessions. "Finding" the "truth" is something the court of law has to figure out. The police is presenting interrogation footag, often. And it often is uses as evidence, successfully, as we see here.
@Ras Mus sometimes things are not as they seem to be, i came across some documentary where that best explains my point in this regard. a welfare check was requested on a couple. the cops knocked on the door and guy opened. he had a black eye which he couldn't explain how he got it. his girlfriend lay dead on the couch and he just assumed that he was sleeping. his he was interrogated for hours by cops who wanted to get nothing but a confession out of him. he kept saying that they were attacked but the cops weren't buying it. after several hours the cops realized that he was telling the truth and he had been shot 4 times in the head and somehow he managed to survive.
Yep. I live in TX where it feels like everyone but me is armed to the teeth. Therefore, I avoid confrontation. It’s absolutely not worth losing your life over a parking spot, your place in line, or some other inconsequential thing.
@Sereti Lee good for you for watching a documentary about a few bad cops. Your parents must be so proud of you for watching that. Too bad that case has nothing to do with this case. It was an okay try though.
@Devada he didn't say that🤣 youre gonna have to try harder than that to put words in someone's mouth. "Avoid petty arguments" he wouldn't have shot anyone had he not started a petty argument.
not even if you have spoken to a lawyer. Never speak to any police officer or investigator not one word. This man is only in jail because he is inarticulate. He isn't a master liar or even a criminal.
Being wrong about your perception of events, is not a guilty mind.
He doesn't understand the role of the police officer whose sole goal is to make him appear guilty. This man lacks the requisite intent "mens rea" or guilty mind to be guilty. This is obvious, as he even tells the cop if the video showed differently he wouldn't believe him. There isn't a shred of evidence this man thought or believed he wasn't under attack and at risk for serious bodily harm.
Almost all the comments are about him being wrong in his memory of events. This man did not prepare his responses or review a video tape and simply told his perception. Being wrong is not a crime. 2.5 seconds? Not guilty Sad part is this man probably got reaction training from the same police department.
Not going to argue your last two points cause I agree with them but the first point "mind your own business" is a bad take. In Philadelphia a man groped a woman on a train with her trying to make him stop and no one told him to fuck off or tried to help the woman. Should people just mind their own business when a sexual assault happens?
@TheNeomaster15 Philly resident. Valid point but sure we are talking about a handicapped parking spot and comparing it to sexual assault. Come on now dawg
@TheNeomaster15 Well yea, you are 100% right. I would probably get involved, but I meant in petty confrontation like in this video. Confronting someone over parking in a handicap spot in an empty parking lot couldve saved 2 lives. Both McGlockton and Drejka's since there is a high chance he will die in prison.
@Gerald McDermott I am just taking the original post at face value. We should definitely encourage others to follow the law, even something like a person littering people should be give them the stink eye. Shouting and then pulling a gun... hmmm, that is not the type of encouragement I am thinking of or suggesting.
@R J I think the fact he went up to the woman in the car and started shouting was definitely the wrong way to go about it. A simple "hey I see you don't have a disability placard, I know you are in a rush but someone might need this spot." Would have been much more tactful.
America, the land of the free: Mind your own business, do not speak out against offenses because you should expect to get hurt. Ahh that good old freedom of speech thing still alive and well, in their fantasies...
@Sereti Lee No matter what if you’re in the interrogation room you should never talk without a lawyer present. It’s very easy to incriminate yourself even if you are not guilty. In this case however this guy is guilty.
The 'Miss my girls' comment, referring to his dogs, is a perfect example of how deluded he is. Bro, you offed a person por pushing you. You're crying about your dogs but didn't shed a single tear when the detectives told you that you murdered that man. Ridiculous.
@tenkomori bc he is responsible for the unwarranted death of a man and a family with children now suffer, if an animal who’s life is completely pointless is seen as more valuable you have a problem
@Sabrason Woooow! And I totally don't suspect any bias in this comment. (sarcasm, mind you) Did you not watch the whole video, or are you just racist, because I sure don't want to make any assumptions like Michael.
Guys, let's be fair. Clearly what Michael would be feeling is shame and guilt when he killed him. However, shame, guilt and lonliness are not the same things. Feeling shameful or remorseful for killing someone would not assert a feeling of sadness. Therfore, Michael would not be crying because of guilt either. He may feel guilty, and feels like he deserves what's coming to him, but he still wouldn't feel lonely because he murdered someone he didn't know until a couple of hours ago. When he misses his dogs, he is feeling lonely. He wants a sense of friendship in him, but was sad when he couldn't meet that need. He could have been deluded, but let's be honest here. wouldn't we all be depressed if we were lonely.
Technically, he didn't murder the man. It was manslaughter. Murder is homicide with intent, or homicide that was planned out. Michael was acting in the moment, he didn't plan on killing Markus the night or week before. making it manslaughter, homicide without malice aforethought.
@Nadia Mendes Anybody who lays hands and commits assault deserves whatever force the victim feels is necessary to prevent further bodily harm = SYG law.
@Zheka Zheka Exactly, same here and people will continue to do the same thing but they'll be smarter about what they say to police afterward. Many legal experts thought it was a justified SYG shooting but Drejka made the mistake of cooperating with police instead of shutting up and lawyering up and the Judge wanted to punish him for being a wannabe parking lot cop. That's the only reason he was convicted.
@Anna Arkless Sabrason has said this same bullshit on multiple other comment threads. He claims to be a gun owner with a concealed carry license, and if that's the case, I fear for the community that he lives in. He has no idea what proper SYG is, and if he were put into this situation, he might've even followed McGlockson into the store and shot him again in the head while he's laying in a pool of blood. I'm a gun owner and I can confidently say that anyone the defends Drejka as Sabrason does, does not deserve to have their 2nd amendment right.
@Justin thats terrifying, I absolutely agree. Even as a non american, i'm completely in favour of the 2nd amendment and am pro gun - but people like sabrason who clearly pose a threat to people around them should forfeit this right.
i cant understand how someone could watch this video, learn about the case, see the literal video evidence of mcglockton retreating, and still try to defend his killer. not only that, but call the victim a "violent animal", its honestly a horrifying outlook.
@Anna Arkless I get what your saying but you absolutely can shoot someone for assaulting you because you are afraid that they might kill you. The problem here is that the defendent basically destroyed any defence he might have had by talking to the police as if he was a hero who calmly and sensibly eliminated a threat. Thats a position that you can't really defend.
@Anna Arkless "I didn't know he was retreating, all I know is that he was attacked me and wanted to kill me. I was very afraid." This argument has been used to win many, many self defence cases. The defendent here clearly didn't think this was the case and tried to get revenge on an attacker which is obviously not OK.
@FlavoredRice even if he didnt retreat, killing an unarmed attacker 2 seconds after you were pushed over is an extreme overreaction. he had a lot more time to think and assess the situation, but he was just a trigger happy moron who killed a guy who was trying to protect his family
@Anna Arkless Shoving a man half your size and twice your age to the ground without so much as a word for talking to your wife is not defending your family. That's assault.
@FlavoredRice yes, its assault. but he wasnt "talking" to his wife, he was shouting at her. and assault, unless theres a clear reason to believe that the other person is armed and ready to kill (which obviously wasnt the case), is no excuse for shooting to kill without even thinking
@Anna Arkless Yelling at someone isn't grounds for assault. And you don't have to be armed to kill. You can kill someone with your bare hands. You dont need to verify that the man has a weapon to be justified in self defence. In this case, the defendent was in the wrong. His actions would have been justified if he had shot multiple times immediately after drawing his firearm(or in other words, in a panic). But he waited 2-3 seconds, fired once, then boasted about it to police. He wasn't afraid, and so it wasn't justified.
@Psi He took a step back but could've pulled a firearm and fired back at Drejka at the same time so there was no way to know in that moment. It's not like he put his hands up and said "don't shoot" --- he didn't say anything. A hoplophobe is somebody who's anti-gun, not pro-gun. If you don't live in the US and are not familiar with our SYG laws then you're not qualified to offer an intelligent opinion about it.
@filler Not true but anything can be used as a weapon including body parts (hands, feet, etc). SYG laws define when a person can use LETHAL force to prevent further bodily harm, not you and your nonsense opinions.
@Sabrason firstly, you have no clue what MDMA does. If anything, it would make someone the opposite of likely to kill someone.
Secondly, the video evidence clearly shows mcglockton retreating. if you watch the literal video tape of the killing, there is absolutely no other conclusion you can come to unless you delude yourself.
im no hoplophobe, i love guns and think all people, other than dangerous people who think its okay to shoot someone who's retreating, should be able to carry one.
please just watch the video with your eyes actually open, and at least try to leave your racial bias at the door beforehand, okay?
@More Human Than Human As a person who has lived though something like this and not having a dad. Yes. It is a horrible and painful scar you will have to deal with no matter what. Nothing can replace the person who put you in this world.
Its terrible man. I do think the guy is an asshole for pushing and staying at a handicapped spot, but holy shit be killed over that is crazy. And those kids, that's seriously terrible.
As a someone who also conceal and carries, this is so out of line... carrying a gun doesn’t make you a tough guy. His life was never in danger. He was looking for a reason to pull his weapon, also he has a history of it. He’s the type of person who wants everyone to know that he carries and it strokes his ego by doing it... the outcome of this doesn’t surprise me at all.
Exactly! I have a CCP and being a disabled vet with a handicap placard I get annoyed when people park in handicapped spots when they don’t have one. Yet I never go off on someone for it to create a problem or say anything. Maybe a shake of my head that’s it. Which is funny because people have no issues saying stuff to me assuming I must of stole my grandmas placard. Lol
Concealed carry everyday because I live in the woods and it’s kind of necessary. I’ve even been in fights while carrying and never drawn my firearm! I believe in gun rights but people should have to get a real psychological evaluation before you can concealed carry or own anything besides a 22 caliber.
Dude blind sided him and he hit pretty damn hard on the pavement. All because his lazy ass didn't park in a regular parking spot. To say his life wasn't in danger is a total lie. The reason people carry is to protect themselves, and the only reason the attacker didn't follow up with punches and kicks was that he saw the man had a gun. If he didn't have a gun he would have been seriously beaten.
@S P That's why you don't talk to the cops. Even when you're innocent, they'll pry and pry until they get a contradiction in your narrative. They're the second prosecution attorney.
We all know he was about to get a beating , the woman got out of the car as soon as she seen her man come out of the store . If he didn't pull out that gun It was going down . Truth is everyone was at fault, the woman started everything by parking in a handicap spot , the shooter should have just minded his own business, but to ignore the victim was acting aggressive, he stepped it up , escalated the situation , violence was not called for and he paid the ultimate penalty.
@Jac S Right. Assumed the "Black guy", who immediately begin to retreat once he knew the killer was armed with a gun, his hands clearly visibleand empty, was armed "to". Even thre killer admits that he saw nonweapon, and that he thought that he was about to be attacked "kicked". If you want to defend this lying murderer, just try and defend him outright. Don't try and defend him while pretending to be objective in the face of facts which clearly prove otherwise.
Anthony Michael Durkin so it’s ok for somebody to put their hands on him when he was just shouting? She was shouting to! He was not the first person to use violence the dead guy is!! See how that turned out for him! Maybe he shouldn’t have pushed him over!?
How interesting Americans frequently talk about using and having guns for defense. This guy bought into that sales pitch. It cost a young man his life. This consequence is surely foreseeable. He is a victim of his self righteousness and fear. The young man who died too eas a casualty of the gun loving culture that is everywhere.
Not enough people are mentioning (although I only thought about it when someone else mentioned) this dude flat out drove up to the woman's car, parked illegally himself, and then started yelling at her loud enough to get her husband's attention inside the store.
He certainly doesn't care about law and order, and thinks he's above the law in enforcing his will on others, so he can feel like a big man with a gun.
He must've seen who was in the car from a way off, and for some reason decided to antagonize her.
Mike Neuburger2021-06-08 14:42:54 (edited 2021-06-08 14:45:01 )
@largestbiddie if he’d done his due diligence and waited half a second after drawing his gun they guy probably would have backed off. Self defense with a firearm doesn’t have to equate to shooting someone with it. It happens without a shot fired all the time. <edit> he was already backing off 🤦♂️
@Hammerest yep, see my edit. He clearly had no intention of avoiding a confrontation from the beginning. He’s not a cop, or the proprietor so where they parked was literally none of his business.
Such a senseless loss of Life. Those children are now left without a daddy not to mention that little boy has got to have PTSD from watching his father die in front of his eyes. People need to learn (or Re-learn,) how to de-escalate.
This dude is a CLOWN. He makes self defenders look bad. He was thinking “oh yess I finally get to use my pistol as self defense” that’s why it took 2 seconds to pull the trigger. He couldn’t help himself. He wanted to use it
So if someone throws you to the ground over a verbal dispute would you be comfortable trusting your aggressor to not kick you in the head? I personally would not trust a person physically attacking me. Being on the ground is a dangerous place to be. Look at the the people being attacked while on the ground in the recent riots. I already had to relearn how to walk once, and really don’t want to go through that again.
@Spektor 22 umm yea, if it happened exactly like it DID happen. Dude pushed him and backed away. He wasn’t charging. And I would have seen that and told s him I don’t want any trouble. If u carry a gun it’s on you to de escalate so u don’t have to use your pistol. At the very MOST all he had to do was pull his pistol out and show the dude.
@Spektor 22 It seems like everyone defending this guy has an equally stupid false dichotomy. "Would you rather do nothing?" "Are you supposed to just take it?" "Would you just trust your attacker?"
None of you seem to understand the fact that he could have kept the gun aimed at him until he left, then call the police and/or leave the area.
@Balloon Eater You don't get to shoot someone just because they "might" have a gun. Anyone could pull a gun on you, that doesn't give you the right to shoot them just in case.
If that's the case then the push was also justified because he "might" have attacked his wife.
We don’t live in a war zone, so it’s not wise to get training on using deadly force - your subconscious might seek out a situation where you could use it. One slip and you might get your fantasy, but at the cost of your freedom (society needs to be protected). Why society is keen to put shooters in jail, but strongly resists gun control is a bit of a paradox however. It seems the spirit of the law and special interest lobby groups are in a tug-of-war.
being a self defender is important. Doesn’t matter that we don’t live in a war zone. Some people are just too stupid to own guns. But tha law is tha law and it won’t change just cuz he was irresponsible with a firearm
The preamble of the narrator made it sound like the other guy was on top of him. When I saw a guy on his knees aiming a gun at a guy that really wasn't moving it threw me for a loop. The presentation of a firearm was an escalation of force, the use of a brandished firearm is too convey that further aggression will.be met with deadly force.
Yeah once I saw the video and the amount of time it took for him to draw, aim, and fire. He was 100% in the wrong. He got shoved. That act alone does not warrant a deadly force response.
shane glass Don’t like the option of your life being taken from you? Don’t put your hands on another human being, and your chances of surviving go way up. Words are not a reason to ever throw someone to the ground, and if you do then you may not being going home.
Yea like he literally just pushed him. I feel this guy was just going out to make someone mad so he could shoot someone and say he did it if u get what I’m saying
@-- >You don't get to shoot someone just because they "might" have a gun. Anyone could pull a gun on you, that doesn't give you the right to shoot them just in case.
Not really what happened here. You conveniently didn't include the part where he got violently shoved to the ground out of nowhere...
Reading through this thread makes it seem like Americans care more about freedom than people's life. "Even if he’s in the wrong it’s not the risk of my freedom." No emphasis on the life you would take. (I'm for self-defense, but the mentality I see surrounding it is worrying)
@Mr D I've been involved in multiple situations unfortunately where someone gets shoved, then gets up and fights. What follows is a pissed off person with backup and weapons to retaliate. It's not so cut an dry like you make it seem. If you push/punch/whatever someone to the ground, expect retaliation. I'm not justifying anything, just saying what is real.
Anyone defending this mans actions on killing a man proves that all of you should not beyond any circumstance, own or operate any firearm. Y’all are clowns and cowards. I wouldn’t trust y’all with karate lessons. Focus on growing up as human beings instead of reverting back to children in adult bodies.
@Timothy Bayliss watch closely 2:30 black guy walk to shooter before he pull gun and after pushing him. It is preposterous to asume that pulling up gun was escalation because it prevent white guy to get beat up. And rightly so because when You have a gun you have to pull it before someone can take it from you or beat you because then it was to late. BUT when black guy back down and don't move ONLY THEN white guy can deescalate situation, as he should. Killing him in this situation was murder, he should have call cops if he fell hurt by that push, but killing someone for that is crazy.
@Bobby Flay no you can't. Pleace yourself in that situation. If You have a gun you cant take kick in head because you provide gun to someone who have no boundies. You can't do that. Thats why pulling gun in this situation was 100% correct. BUT shoting someone was simply wrong, and only that part.
@Spektor 22 he was literally looking for trouble. It’s not his job to see which car should be in a disabled parking spot or not, if there was a problem he should have called the right people to deal with it. He intentionally started a fight and even had his pistol on him. He just wanted to boost his ego with his gun
@sc666666well I wouldn’t have shot I woulda showed the pistol and put distance between us.. I get it tho, you play stupid games you win stupid prizes. But the punishment didn’t fit the crime. The fact is, he wasn’t gonna keep attacking. He pushed and walked away a little. And if he did everything he did BESIDES shoot, it woulda ended there
@Gordon Collins WHEN your in a sitation like that you dont know whats happening im not saying the guys a good person but i think its compleatly justifyable him pulling the gun out i dont think people relise how much damage someone can do to you if your on the ground kick to the head could give you brain damage you dont want that shit he wants the agressor in this sitaution either he was the one that got attacked
@Mr D so you would’ve brandished a firearm without feeling the threat to use it? You realize there have been deaths from throwing people to the pavement with that force.
@SizzleBae what? “Even if he’s in the wrong it’s not the risk of my freedom”. Yeah that’s right. I carry and if I was in this situation, I would have not shot at alllll! Because I don’t wanna kill him OR go to prison cuz I woulda known it wouldn’t be justifiable
@sc666666 true with “play stupid games win stupid prizes” but he clearly didn’t have to shoot. And that’s just a fact. It doesn’t matter how hard the shove was. He’s wasn’t going to do anything more. Especially when he saw the pistol coming out. Dude even pointed the pistol at him for 2.5 seconds and the dude was backing away. He DIDNT have to pull the trigger. U hold your aim on him, get up, back away and leave and call police. If he done that he’d be free and the dude woulda got his due punishment for the assault
@Mr D It does matter how hard the shove was, you don’t know if he would’ve done anything else, you don’t know if anyone was coming out of the car to aid in the attack. It is questionable how long it took for him to shoot.
@sc666666 well u made my point. It’s questionable. The fact there was enough time for him to assert the situation, and NOTHING WAS GOING TO HAPPEN. But he still pressed the trigger. And that’s why he lost in court too
This is the guy who binge watches all Active Self Protection videos, skipping over all the lessons and then carries a handgun around just PRAYING he get's the chance to use it. He's the perfect example of a person who shouldn't carry and we can all do our part to grind our teeth from all his cringe and learn his stupid lessons too.
The entire time all that kept going through my mind was active self protection...although i KNOW he would NOT approve even if he hasn't already went over this exact video I just had a feeling it was those videos or those types that made him feel like it was ok...clearly only taking bits and pieces out he has missed the bigger picture. All the tactical shit he claims to have done he did horribly even if in the moment u should still be able to tell if someone is holding still or moving towards or away from you and why start some shit if you need to bring a pistol to a fist fight!?
@Liyakun Montenegro Yep, a dude in jail has beat him with a lock in a sock, he was maybe trying to protect the handicap toilet and forgot that he didn't have his gun in there. The guy with the sock should have a medal for that.
@Andrew Aeterno Sad to hear what happened to you, but don't let it ruin your life today. Put it behind you and stay positive. Hope you have a lucky and happy future.
Definitely a lesson to be careful of confrontation, if you address something with negatively what do you expect to get out of it. There is a way to educate someone about a wrong doing without creating confrontation, not they they aren’t like this guy. I guarantee had he been the one in the car it would have ended the same way he wanted a negative reaction probably based off first glance of the person sadly.
This is why people need to learn actual gun safety and learn how to act with guns. Guns are just tools. No different from a power saw or a drill. Humans are the only thing that can add intent to any action carried out with any firearm. This is what happens when idiots get ahold of dangerous tools. Just like the kind of idiots who cut their finger off with a circular saw or hit themselves with a chainsaw because they aren't practicing basic safety protocols. Except this guy was a step beyond, he wanted to cause an accident with the tool he didn't understand.
I watch those vids alot but I'm not permitted to carry my pistol concealed so I never do but even if I did I'd think 3 times before pulling it out especially when I know I'm not a fucking navy seal or anything like that god forbid a stray bullet hits a kid or something like that I couldn't live with myself if I did that and I never put myself in positions like this or start fights because I feel all big with a gun in my waistband. This man should obviously never owned a firearm some people can't handle having all that killing potential in their holster and let it get to their head. My brother got rid of a rifle he had because he was having mental issues and knew it wouldn't be responsible for other people around him to keep it. Responsible gun owners usually never let it be known they have a gun and don't act offensively. Especially don't go looking for trouble
When you are carrying a firearm, you have a moral obligation to avoid and de-escalate confrontation at all costs. Even if it means seeming like a coward to someone being aggressive.
You definitely don't start screaming at people for stuff like parking in a handicapped spot. The gun isn't a second dick. It doesn't make you a tough guy.
There was no need for him to shoot the guy but man he did only pull the trigger once. Most ppl survive when getting shot once unless it’s a bullseye in the head or heart
You know, he initiated the first confrontation with the woman. Then In hand to hand, he shot a man. The man had no weapon, and a few seconds went by then he’s shot. I carry every day, but I’d never shoot unless they shoot at me first. Otherwise we can do hand to hand combat. I’d rather a few bumps and bruises and a headache than taking a man’s life. I’ve done two tours in Afghanistan as an 11B. I’ve boxed since I was 9. I’d rather give or take an a••whooping than to take that person’s last breath from them. Just my opinion though🤷♂️. But he could’ve avoided all this, he just felt too big. He misused his rights. People like him are scum, and impulsive.
My heart breaks for Marquise McGlouglin, Brittany Jacob’s and their precious children. Michael Derek’s is a vigilante run amok. He wasn’t your regular vigilante. He was out looking to kill someone and he did. First degree murder.
To collapse in front of my son.. What gives me life itself... Idk.. My thoughts wouldve been of him and thinking ive got to make it, I cant leave him/them.. Im just speculating here but the white guy couldve actually been fearing for his life but if it was me. If I had to pull the gun out it wouldve been because the other guy pulled a gun out. A man defending his woman is nothing the be killed over and all over parking in a handicapped space? Dude your not batman! And he doesnt look handicap himself! Just park somewhere else and go on about your business.. But no instead hes got to make a big deal about it and take a father away from his children.. In front of them no less.. These are reasons I hate my own race.
Lol I'm assuming the racism from the convict here is so painfully obvious that no one felt the need to comment on it. "She was probably smoking crack" and the concept of black children losing their father and a wife losing her husband to gun violence at the hands of a self-entitled white man.
But genuinely, also appreciate the comments detailing gun ownership responsibilities - very cool
There is another one not minding his business and playing the enforcer and starting stuff then when overpowered talks about "self defense". If someone is physically assaulted you should intervene if you can. But if some idiot is parked in a handicapped spot, as uncivil, selfish, pathetic (and criminal) as it may be, just mention it to the person if you want, but don't start something, then talk about self defense. Had he not started this he would never have had to self defend himself. You can't instigate a situation then claim to be the victim.
I completely agree that this guy is guilty of murder. But the thing that annoys me is that a police officer would have done exactly the same as him in his situation. Both murderers that can't fight fairly.
As a human being, we are born with ego, self-esteem, pride and hot temper. From what i saw in this, the black guy came and pushed the white guy fall down to the street. What else has fallen? All the listed above, and that'd trigger the incident causes both of them paid a very high price.
Lol again still laugh at this heres an idea iv had people argue with my girl friends before unless they physically harm her I see no point in shoving a man to the ground. XD Poor guy he went before his brother Fentanyl Floyd. THUG LIFE
It's the little things about this story. The way he describes shooting a man in the chest as "neutralizing a threat". The way he snidely reacts to the fact that she has kids in the car 24:50 , and the way he balks at even taking the bullets out of the magazine, as if it's ridiculous not to be ready to kill someone at a moment's notice. This is not the first time he confronted random people with a gun, either. He was waiting for something like this to happen so he could be G.I. Joe. This guy is self-righteous POS and deserves to be locked up.
not really the point of the video but 35:30. HOW the hell can you be a Cop and not know what "force multiplier" means I'm in the UK which has the rarest shooting instince and still know what that means. Weird.
The disabled parking enforcer is so inspiring! What heroism and bravery, to stand up for what is just and right, acting with such level headed judgment in the face of danger, he puts even the most hardened war veterans to shame!
Drejka is disgusting, to watch him cry bc he missing his children was really pathetic. The little children they were in the car have now a life without a father and his wife without her husband. Just bc some moron wanted to play a cop ?? I mean 30y are not enough. The man lost his life and not only 30y. I would give drejka life in prison without a parole.
Isnt it funny how people look the part? You can take one look at this guy and go "yeah, I can totally see him flipping his shit at the slightest provocation"
He ask the detective where did the guy even come from?? U no where he came frome because in the beginning u said the guy ran back into the store after u shot him y would u say back into the store 🤔 because u see him coming the whole time
I mean obviously you don't go shooting people. That aside, the illegal parking of the woman and the shove of the man is also an "interesting" feature. It's more like two bad things collide and the worse "wins".
I see a lot of people saying the shooter was in the wrong and people saying the other guy shouldn’t have assaulted him. Legally speaking. Yes. You are correct. Unless he was verbally threatening the guys wife with violence - he legally should not have shoved him like that.
However. As a man. I don’t get why anyone would make such a big deal about him being parked there for 2 minutes. And if I came out and some guy was screaming at my girlfriend and saying god knows what .. I would probably either yell at him or push him or some shit I think this guy took an over dramatic dive when he pushed him. And I think this guy WANTED to shoot this man. Like he 100 percent did it out of anger. And not self defense. Which is fucking insane.
If I had a gun on me. I would NOT be going out of my way to potentially get into a physical altercation. I think you are agreeing to certain principles when you carry a gun.
Guy shouldn't have been shot, but I don't see why he ran up and pushed the shooter. They were just arguing. A friend of mine pushed a drunk guy who fell, hit his head on the concrete and died. A family man. My buddy had his life pretty much destroyed because of that incident.
I'm not sure why, but him complaining about his arm and pretty much acting like it's broken really pissed me off. You're fine, the guy you killed....isnt
You see him lean on it so many times and propping himself up using his "injured" arm. That part really pissed me off too, like a school yard bully who cries the second someone hits them back.
He was able to flick his cap onto the table using that arm, amazing how his arm also got better as the interview went along, he forgot to pretend it was injured!!
Right! He's acting like ohhh poor me, my arm hurts. And as you guys said, it's clearly bullshit and he's completely fine. It's also pretty chilling how he legit doesn't seem to think he did anything wrong and talks to the cops as if he's one of them. This guy is legit dangerous.
@Ismail He was pushed to the ground for harassing someone he really had no business harassing. Call the cops if you must. The point is drawing the gun was more than enough, he had zero reason to pull the trigger. That man is dead. As others have pointed out, it seems pretty clear he is exaggerating his "injury", and is looking for pity when his idiotic actions resulted in someone dying.
Although I would agree that he shouldn't have shoved him. I prefer using reason first. But there was zero justification for him pulling that trigger. You watched the video I assume, so you know that. No one is going to feel bad for his bruised elbow (and ego clearly) when he shot and killed a man because he felt like it.
@Jakub Lizon him saying something about a handicapped space isnt 'harrassment' .. (at all ..!) and no one has any right to get VIOLENT when someone points out youre parked illegally in a handicapped spot .. had the other guy not gotten violent, he'd still be around .. period .
@BEAUTYnIQ It doesn't matter if he pushed him, using a gun on someone is always the most extreme option you can take in any situation. He could have used the gun to get him to back off, get himself on his feet, and leave, but instead he pulls the trigger, even as the guy is backing off. Self-defense stops being self-defense once the person you feel endangered by is no longer a threat.
He wasn't just pointing out she was in a handicapped spot, he was apparently angrily confronting her and screaming at her at the top of his lungs, and you can see this from the gesticulating in the footage, so her boyfriend probably assumed he was a threat to her and pushed him to get him to back off. No, he shouldn't have pushed him, but he was all too eager to use that gun, even after the pusher backed off. And the shooter should have just reported them to the store, because no, whether or not someone is in a handicapped spot is not his business and if he thinks someone shouldn't be there the easiest avenue is to talk to store management who'll get them towed.
That wasn't even much of a push. A normal guy would lose and then catch his balance. So much for his self-defense reaction. The guy was so intent on yelling at the woman that he allowed someone to blindside shove him.
@vaneast411 Yeah also him as a kid learned from someone if he does anything wrong put it on his own pain for the sympathy and changing subject. Kids acts like that usually.
@sugo - That's not true actually, I broke my arm when I was 18 and didn't feel a thing. I was at work at the time and a colleague rushed me to the hospital, I was telling them to slow down because I wasn't going to die FFS! Lol... While there the nurse took off my shirt and said "you're long", I replied "that's what they all say", she went bright red! Lol I'm 6'4 and so long arms obviously...
Any way I was convinced I had dislocated my shoulder. They gave me an x-ray and after that was done came back in and said I wouldn't make a very good doctor, because it was broken! XD
All that time I felt no pain and was laughing and joking. I was in shock though most likely.
snaz27 same here actually, ive broken both within the last 6 months, i was laughing and joking too, it just hurt on the car ride there, any bump got amplified
@vaneast411 Did you watch him take that hard shove and fall directly onto his arm without breaking his fall? Yeah... It's not acting. That guy really assaulted him. He really hurt his arm.
@Dr. Lex Winter tell you what I wouldn't do if someone pushed me onto concrete and I had no serious damage. I wouldn't jump up like a cowardly psycho and kill someone with a loaded gun.
@xlr8r2010Oh you're just saying huh? And if drejka wasn't cold blooded enough to shoot a man because he felt like it, he'd be alive. He is in prison for good reason. It wasn't self defense, this man was no longer any theat, he was backing off. Are you saying it was appropriate for drejka to shoot and kill him after simply pulling the gun had already ended it? Your choice if words is very telling, as if you don't want to say it, but genuinely don't give a shit drejka wrongfully killing this man. Or you just have a disturbingly twisted sense of justice, and believe we should just kill each other in revenge. If I'm wrong, go ahead and explain.
@Dr. Lex Winter Would you start an argument you didn't need to with someone parked in a handicapped spot? Then proceed to raise your voice so loud that someone felt the need to defend the person you were clearly yelling at? Of course YOU wouldn't. But he did, and he was all too quick to use his gun. In a situation that really didn't call for it.
@Lookingglass Yeah, nah. You're simplifying too much. Homeboy obviously felt the need to defend his woman. Plus this dude had a gun, he shouldn't even be in a position where's he arguing with anyone. Most people who have their arms registered don't go start fights for no reason.
@James Ryder If the shove never happened...the gun, never gets fired. TRUTH!
0 likes
James Ryder2020-07-10 17:59:11 (edited 2020-07-10 18:01:10 )
@xlr8r2010 Nah. If homeboy just minded his own business and stayed in his car. Didn't start an argument with oldgirl. He wouldn't be in jail right now. As well like I said. He knew he had a gun with him, legally he had no business trying to start or have an argument with anyone, period. If I registered my arms/hands as lethal weapons legally I can't start an altercation, or be apart of one because my hands are registered weapons. All anyone has to say is that they saw me raise my hand/arm, and I'm liable to get life just by swaying my arm. Even if no one got seriously hurt.
47:20 Protect your family from what a white dude talking about how you shouldn't be parked there ohh yeah that's a valid reason to go and tackle someone to protect your family right imagine
Bruh... dude literally pulled the gun out saw him backing up not wanting to piss off a dude with a gun then he just shoots hin like wtf? And thats aftet the fact hes just defending his wife and child from some strange old dude all im their face arround their car
His lack of remorse is likely due to being celebrated and protected by the white power/Nazis in prison while also being surrounded by people who confirm the bias that led him to shoot the victim in the first place, so I'm not sure why I was so shocked when he said it.
Bemuses me why people in America are allowed to have firearms legally on their person. A gun makes you a coward in my opinion, if he felt threatened he should have got up and fought with his fists like a real man.
As soon Drejka entered detectives AZZ I knew no remorse whatsoever, no guilt in his mind, like he will get scott free, well it aint 50s and yeah, CCTV brah.
It’s possible adrenaline produced from playing through the scenario probably helped him forget about the pain. He may also have been given a pain pill at some point.
@Haley T I was once interrogated by cops i didn't do anything and i was so scared and pumped with adrenaline for sure. I didn't lie, didn't do anything wrong and yes it was horrible experience ......... Especialy in times of internet and hundred of cases of falsely accused people that ended up in prison for long time. It's no joke iam telling you ........ It mostly depends on person, but i have ptsd to this day from that interrogation, just because iam very emphatic person, who just couldn't believed, that somebody could accused me from harming anybody or commit armed robbery.
@Pepsolman adrenaline works the opposite way.... it’s an immediate physiological defense to pain and shock that wears away over time. so technically, whether the adrenaline was from the incident and/or being interrogated, the pain would’ve worsened the longer he sat there. unless of course lying to the authorities kept fueling his adrenaline 😬
The black dude shouldn’t have got violent tbh. Hot temper played a part in his demise. Wrong parts on both sides. Tough to make good decisions in the heat of the moment I’m sure.
drejka's problem was that he was attempting to play cop..... if not him, it may have been someone else....
just imagine for a moment, that if there were a non disabled parking space.......... humanity suffers from a multitude of self inflicted failures.......
Investigator: Do you have any military training? Suspect: Yes Sir, I served on all the CALL OF DUTY games on all platforms and watched Police academy twice.
What Michael did do to be pushed with that level of aggressiveness? I mean she did park in the handicap area. If that guy could push a man like this, why can't Michael self-defense?
You were pushed in the back???…. No you were bushed on to your back big difference cowboy honest did he die in jail I need to know blatant disrespect for the life of another man
At the point he had pulled his gun out and the other dude stepped back and took a more defensive body posture, I can't believe with good heart that the shooter still felt in danger. Even in moments of stress, when the counterpart starts acting defensively and backing up, this immediately registers with all your senses, consciously and unconsciously.
@RAF Mag he was harassing his partner, the man should’ve reacted better and probably spoke rather than using violence but when ur seeing ur childs mother in a verbal conflict with a grown man you’re obviously gonna go full protector mode
I agree, he was backing up, thats when you get up, get in your car and leave. Him saying he needed to nuetralize the threat, the threat had been neutralized as soon as he pulled the gun. There was no reason to fire.
He sure as hell felt in danger, but only because this was a black man that had just hurt him and his ego. The racist undertones are hard to deny, he definitely felt threatened by this powered black man who he believes would kill him. I imagine it'll be a while before society kicks down racial stereotypes, especially with strong black men defending their families.
Let’s forget that the idiot is yelling at a lady for parking illegally while he is parked illegally as well. I can somewhat understand why he drew his weapon after being pushed to the ground. However, there was absolutely no reason for him to pull the trigger at that point, and he knew that. Once you pull that trigger in any situation, your life changes forever one way or the other.
Drejka had pulled this shit on like 4 different occasions in just the last 5 years. He retired early because of wear and tear on his body and also because he had a decent inheritance left to him. Unfortunately he had no aim or purpose in his life. He was looking for a situation where he could create a conflict and then shoot someone in self defense, in some bizarre kind of hero fantasy he had. He wanted to be a cop or in the military but wasn't cut out for either. Being some heroic citizen that saves the day was the next best thing for him, only that scenario isn't so common to find yourself in, so he was trying to make one happen. He was a ticking timebomb.
I will never ever understand how bootlickers don't know better then to willingly speak to cops (after killing someone) or give them permission to do anything (like search a car)... like seriously... what are you thinking?
Even if I was 200% innocent I would know better then to do that!
UPDATE: On October 10, 2019, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit of 92 days for time served. He is imprisoned at Lancaster Correctional Institution, near Trenton, Florida, where he was attacked and reportedly wounded by another inmate on February 11, 2020
@Casey Not really. Those kids are going to miss out on their dad taking care and providing for them for their entire lives. He won't be at their weddings, he won't be coming home to play with them. The fact that the father lost his life over a parking space and the perpetrator only gets 20 years is an injustice. Couple that with the fact that Drejka threatened other people with a gun before this, not just once but multiple different people - he is a hazard to be on the street. This might have been prevented had anyone stopped him to begin with. But I suppose someone had to lose their life before this loser received time. The fact is, it was preventable, all of it. If he didn't agree with the woman parking in the space, he could have said something. But he lingered, raising it to a shouting match. Husband comes out, thinks someone is threatening the wife... the victim did what any husband would do, and tried to make the crazy man back off. Twenty years isn't enough, because those kids will now not have the finances to do better in life, because their father isn't there to provide for them.
@Let the No One meme die already I honestly think Frog meant that he should have been given more. The max was thirty years. I honestly felt, myself, that Drejka should have been given thirty years on account of how he threatened others with a weapon, and it culminated in him killing someone. So maybe I am reading what Frog said as being wrong, but I thought Frog wanted more time for Drejka.
Drejka was struck repeatedly across the head by another inmate, who used a lock inside a sock as a weapon. He received head wounds which needed stitching back together.
He genuinely thought what he was doing right. He shouldn't have start a fight with the lady in the first place. It wasn't his job. But he ended up killing someone without believing he did something wrong. He should have never escalated the situation to the point of needing a gun. The poor kid who lost a father. I hope this man regrets shooting that gun.
Did the car have that invaloid parking permit? IF you park in Inva-park without a permit, something like this will eventually happen, albeit not deadly incident each time necessarily. Also, when do they teach people to ask for lawyer? Oh, they do. Stupid and overaggressive, to the jail, please. "Racial Overtones"? Is that asked in every and each time regardless of the races of the victim and the killer when they are not of same race, all directions?
I’m a highschool psychology teachers assistant and your channel makes my job 100% easier and effortless haha. Whenever the professor calls sick or anything I just play one of your videos and assign worksheets correlating to your vids. Thank you a ton
Bro, you're a highschool psychology teachers assistant, your job is ALREADY 100% easy and effortless lmao! (Just fuckin with ya to get a laugh, I dont actually believe that)
I’m a full time paramedic. I only work 2 days a week, I choose to be a sub on my days off because it’s fun. So no, I’m not qualified for “fuck all”. I can tolerate banter but that’s disrespect.
I’m a substitute, Our jobs as subs is to loosely follow lesson plans and make sure the kids don’t murder eachother. You must be one extremely miserable person if you need to rage over a simple comment, hope everyone is going well at home 🙏🏽
KA- BOOM!!! Oh my god your way of thinking makes my iq drop... the only guy here in the wrong is the dude with the gun. Everyone with simple logic thinking understands this.
@KA- BOOM!!! You do know he pushed him non-lethally and backed up as the guy shot him, right? Pushing someone who is yelling at your wife and kids is grounds for death? You're not going to win this one...
@KA- BOOM!!! Pushing someone is not grounds for killing someone. It's literally that simple. You aren't convincing anybody. With every post you just show your ignorance.
Sleeved Heathen That’s not what i’m saying? Is it ok to shoot someone dead because he pushed you because that guy was yelling at your girl? Totally! Makes sense! Haha!
@GorillionDollarExtreme the father was in the wrong but that doesn't mean he should have been shot. And if you really would do the same and shoot someone over a shove, you should get 20 years too.
Pulling out the pistol was justified use of force, shooting after he stepped back was the issue that was looked at in court.
2 likes
Anthony Valenti2020-09-08 15:11:47 (edited 2020-09-08 15:12:11 )
@KA- BOOM!!! then he shouldn't have a gun if he doesn't have the mental faculties to handle a gun responsibly. The guy murdered someone over a shove. He deserved to be put in prison. If you honestly think he's justified in murdering someone, you need to take a step back and examine why you would come to that conclusion. What in your head could possibly allow you to take this side?
@KA- BOOM!!! first off, I said he was in the wrong for shoving the guy, but he didn't deserve to be shot for it. 2nd, pulling it out was one thing, i would even understand brandishing it, but firing after the man backed away and not even giving so much as a warning is unacceptable. 3rd, let's take your same stupid logic and apply it to Markeis: he sees a man screaming at his wife and children. He gets a burst of adrenaline and can only think that his wife and children are in danger. So he pushes the aggressor. Why is that an excuse for the shooter and not Markeis? What about the shooting is justified in your eyes but not the shove? I don't believe either was in the right but clearly the man who takes another's life is worse. So what the hell is your justification?
@KA- BOOM!!! couldn't tell? Yeah maybe he should have took a split second to check before killing him. Or maybe brandish the weapon, make it known he'd shoot if Markeis continued the assault and then make a judgment call on whether he is still a threat? 99.9999% of times, just showing the gun is enough.
@KA- BOOM!!! great bodily harm? He was fine, other than a scuff on his arm as he said in the interrogation. Markeis is DEAD. No longer among the living.
@KA- BOOM!!! @KA- BOOM!!! again both are in the wrong but Markeis DIDN'T SHOOT ANYONE. Any rational person should expect more restraint from a person holding a weapon that can end a life in an instant. Again, you seem to be not able to understand the difference in consequences between pushing someone and shooting someone. Also, unless you have a death wish, if someone pulls a gun on you, you stop messing with them. I can't think of any situation where any half functioning human being would continue an assault on someone who just pulled out a gun.
And also now you're just making shit up. Drejka had 2 lawyers and Markeis did not punch him. Did you even watch the video? You've resorted to lying at this point lol. Listen, we all know why you really think Drejka was justified in shooting Markeis; you can stop pretending now...
@KA- BOOM!!! Yes I am. I never said i was different. I don't drink because it makes it a problem for me so you are right. Doesn't mean my reasoning is wrong, it just means i am flawed in the same way.
@KA- BOOM!!! meanwhile, in reality, more Americans have renounced their citizenship this year than any prior year. The Americans who CAN get away are. God bless America.
Lars van Zutphen yes! I’m thinking maybe he saw it as his chance to shoot a black man since he initiated the physical altercation. He had no right to pull his gun and kill a man over getting pushed! This pisses me off
KA- BOOM!!! He was not facing an immediate threat to his life by being pushed down lol. This guy 100% looked for yet another opportunity to abuse his second amendment right after he had a history of threatening women and children with his firearm in the past. Should have been taken away from him a long time ago. Idc what the other people in the handicap spot were doing, they were not trying to take his life, he felt safe going after those people because he had a gun and wasn’t afraid to use and abuse it. Period.
@KA- BOOM!!! You would never make a great detective. You are assuming intention and many other things. You have no idea what this man's intentions were. And, that he "illegally parked" himself definitely shows his "principles" are subpart at best. Whether he was parking his car to curse her out and then go park again or not he still was chastising someone for doing the very thing that he had just done. That my friend is called: hypocrisy -- no matter how you slice the cake. You seem hell bent on trying to justify this man's actions in some way or another I. You're more concerned with someone parking in a handicap space at a store with multiple parking spots available than someone shooting another person at point blank range simply because they got pushed to the ground. Yes, it was assault. Yes, the boyfriend should not have come out and pushed him. But, we are never justified in fighting pushes with bullets.
@Hybrid Ronin I believe that is precisely the issue. He's a racist person and therefore cannot see the humanity of the black man. If this were two white people in the same scenario I truly doubt he would be in this comment sectionbbeing so defensive of a murderer. People shove, hit and get into physical altercations all the time. Even brothers and sisters get into fist fights. But, normally we don't grab a gun and shoot the person afterwards. If they shove us then we generally shove them back. He understands this but he cannot see the humanity of the African-American man and thus, regardless of whatever, he will find a way to justify the white man's actions. Racism is wrong and murder is wrong. I believe these two facts elude Mr/Mrs. Kaboom.
Ikr. He parked illegally next to someone parked illegally to confront them about their illegal parking and then shot someone for pushing him over even though there was no evident threat of serious harm to him or threat to his life after he was pushed.. Did we just witness a male Karen?
@Sleeved Heathen if that person is harrassing your wife and children, then yeah, it may be justified to shove a person away. What's not legal is shooting someone dead just because they shoved you.
2 likes
b gilley2020-09-26 21:13:16 (edited 2020-09-27 09:47:00 )
@KA- BOOM!!! Not from a legal perspective it isn't, that's why the shooter is in jail. You know what I think? I think if the races were reversed in this case, and a white man walked out of a store and saw a black man harrassing his wife and children, and shoved that man, and then got shot to death while retreating, you'd be calling the white guy a hero for protecting his wife and children, and the black guy a violent thug.
b gilley2020-09-27 09:45:13 (edited 2020-09-27 09:48:33 )
@KA- BOOM!!! You're right, Drejka didn't have a lawyer...he had two. Three if you count the one who was dismissed from the case early on. "The conviction came after 6½ hours of deliberations by the jury of five men and one woman. It was read aloud at 10:41 p.m. Drejka stared straight ahead, standing beside his lawyers. He could face up to 30 years in prison."
It's hard to tell if you're deliberately lying about this case, or if you're genuinely ignorant.
KA- BOOM!!! Quick thing here. Taking the mans history of brandishing his weapon when there is no threat on his life out of the equation, if you watch the video there IS a second that the man with the gun takes before he shoots. I’d say it’s more like 2. In that time the other guy clearly has his hands up and is backing away. The father is also far enough away once he’s on the ground to give him plenty of time to pull his gun AND get into a kneeling position. The man shot him in cold blood. Shoved or not. It’s cold blood. Now if you take his history of blatantly waving his gun around as a power play whenever he damn well felt like it into consideration as well, he is very clearly not aware of the responsibility of having a gun. And being shoved, while it can count as assault, especially since he fell over, is not valid as a life threatening situation. This man should be in jail and should not have access to fire arms. He started the altercation, and while he didn’t start the physical aspect of it, he went in looking for a fight and a way to swing his dick around. The ultimate truth of the matter is that this man is looking for any reason to use his gun. Any. And his mind will create scenarios to make it justified as you can tell when he says the woman was not a threat to himself “anymore”..... from a psychological perspective.
@KA- BOOM!!! you're literally lying about lying now lol. You said if the shooter had a lawyer instead of representing himself. You're not even good at lying.
@KA- BOOM!!! Had Michael not had a firearm, he never would've approached the car to begin with. This is evidenced from his history.
But, let's play this out. He accosts the car occupant. The parking offense probably isn't worth getting that worked up over, but sometimes you just gotta vent, OK. Boyfriend/husband comes up and pushes him. Definitely assault, but potentially could've been reduced in court due to circumstances (was concerned for his partner). Michael instantly draws his weapon. Definitely justified, as conceded by both sides at his trial--blindsided and very easily in fear of bodily harm. Victim sees the gun and instantly backs up. One Mississippi two Mississippi three. Not a long time, but an eternity to see a guy react to your aggressive defense and back up. Unless you never considered the mere threat of a gun could stop anyone and needing to draw equates to always needing to fire. That's where Michael screwed up and a jury of his peers called him out on it.
@xc WotRS Love playing the racist card. Nothing intelligent to add to the discussion just the one liner that is used over and over and over oh did I mention over again ? When all else fails always keep that card in your pocket and pull it out every chance you can . Please. Keep it alive. Whether or not racism plays or doesn't play a factor in the situation, doesn't matter , by god use it anyway . It never gets old and seems to apply to every situation. Unbelievable mind numbing. Don't use this line sparingly. Keep it front and center Again, even if it doesn't apply keep adding it. Thank you for adding deep intellectual dialog . Keep it up, it helps so much.
@orX a what about the woman that parked in a handicap spot? Coming from a disabled individual I find it infuriating when others that do not need the spot somehow justify their entitlement to do anyways. Simple fact when people park in a handicap spot and don't need it is just plain lazy. Ì most definitely say something as well. Not a Karen but if you had a loved one that needs this spot because they have cancer, 😜😜😜
The big difference here was someone was illegally using a space intended for someone with a disability. Why? These type only think of themselves and pure laziness. Again, against the law if you do not have a placard or license plate indicating you may park there. The other vehicle involved may have been a inconvenience to some but was not illegal. Huge difference between the two. Not once has anyone stated how these folks must feel entitled to park illegally because it is convenient for them. I also at every chance I get let people know that it is illegal and she is showing her kids a fine example of what not to do.
@Jeremy Caulk 1 he shouldn't have attacked him 2 he didnt know who started what 3 dude had no idea what might happen next and just tried to defend himself asap
@Brea Devlin are you for real? You're comment is all about the parking spot and how infuriating it is to see someone with out a handicap. So it's ok to shoot someone over it? I don't understand your whining in the comments while the man was shot. That what was infuriating to you? Lol gtfoh
@Anthony Valenti it's funny how you ignore the fact that all of this would have been avoided if he didn't push the guy
0 likes
Anthony Valenti2021-06-21 22:08:08 (edited 2021-06-21 22:19:51 )
@DBZ BT4 Gameplay it's funny how you ignore the several times I said the guy was in the wrong for pushing him yet that doesn't warrant shooting him. Learn to read.
Edit: it's even funnier that you are ignoring the fact the guy was harassing the dude's family and had a history of making threats to shoot people before. Funny how you left all that out.
@Anthony Valenti because they started it 🤦♀️ why would you want me to include something that proves my point and if you really understand the guy was in the wrong for pushing him then you would have known consequences come with that
You can tell by how practiced and confident his language was during the interrogation that he'd been fantasizing and preparing for something like this. The fact that he had multiple run-ins where he was the antagonist further suggests that this was a man who had a gun and was looking to use it.
Take a walk in a ghetto somewhere, preferably at night, being pushed violently on the ground from behind and then sit there and wait to be more violated.
@Chad K Right. I understand what you are saying. This is not quite the same as some of the other cases you mentioned. On the video it looks as if the decedent was backing away at the sight of the gun. I think the decision to fire had already been made it just hadn't gone from brain to finger. Im not so much defending the shooting as pointing out that the criminal conduct of th decedent in initiating the use of force and violence was a key factor even if it doesn't fully justify the shooting. At the end of the day, he'd still be alive if he wasn't so aggressive and quick to violence.
@Chad K I don't know about other cases, all I'm looking at is this case. If there were prior incidents where he inappropriately pulled a gun, which is a use of non deadly force, why wasn't he prosecuted? If he was, he should have lost his carry permit? He never should have made that statement to police, he definitely should have invoked his right to an attorney and said nothing. I think in his mind the decedent was closing on him even though the video doesn't show that. The left turn all kinds of legitimate uses of self defense into media fiascos so this is nothing new.
@Neil Siebenthal He wasn't breaking any law in being nosey about their parking violation. Like i said, the decedent would be alive if he told drejka to shut up and drove off. Yes they could spend the entire car ride home demeaning white people for not minding their business and caring about trivial parking laws. This is the United States of America, outside of threats or a direct incitement to violence, you can say what you want, even if people think it's not your business or think it's dumb...violence in response to speech you think is annoying or dumb isn't appropriate. Besides, although he had the right to say what he said, he couldn't compel them to listen. They were free to drive off without hinderense, had he attempted to prevent that, the use of force would have been appropriate.
@James W "I'm not so much defending the shooting as..." "He'd still be alive if..." That means in some form, you are defending the shooting, while simultaneously blaming the victim.
"...even if it doesn't fully justify the shooting." So there's partial justification in your mind for this shooting?
No. There was no justification here, as was legally decided. What are you smoking?
"The left turn all kinds of legitimate uses of self defense into media fiascos." "They could spend the entire car ride home demeaning white people."
Ah, so you're paranoid about liberals. That would explain the cognitive dissonance.
@Yannis Martynov The fact that this was a violent encounter initiated by the "victim". When someone is suddenly and deliberately attacked from behind, something no descent self respecting human would do... This is not a situation where you can sit down and aynaliticlly weigh the factor for and against danger from the attacker and the pros and cons of taking immediate action. Human instincts evolved not for use in the courtroom but for survivalival in nature. What happens in a case like this is that the decision to shoot had already been made before he began to back off, so him backing off had nothing to do with the decision to shoot, there is just a slight delay as your subconscious mind tells your conscious mind you need to shoot, messages between neurons travel fast but not instantly as your brain as the thoughts travel to all centers of the brain necessary to complete the task, then it again takes time for the message to shoot moves to the muscles in your hand to actually do it, all this takes some time, it may be a second or less but it's enough time for the circumstances to change somewhat, but the call had already been made.
@James W Look. We can debate here, for an eternity, on wether this was some extraordinary situation, or how he was pushed, or no,t, but, it will be looping around, avoiding the main question, me, and several others asked. How does any of that justify cold blooded murder, with the time luxury to properly aim, before firing, more specifically. Havin your opinions, and beliefs, and agenda, is all fine and respected, but, using that to excuse something that's, frankly, beyond reasonable excuse, is best left to defense attorneys, in courtrooms, not youtube comments, because, the only "gain" of this , will be giving everyone the opinion that you use politicalbias to excuse murder. And, that, is not good.
@James W Dude just pushed him he didnt pounced or anything he pulled a gun over a handicapped spot and opened fire for no reason . When some random dude screams at your girlfriend cause i doubt you are old enought to have a wife do you walk away?
@Fenix dont try to justify it. hes been itching to use his gun since the day he bought it, just like most of the gun owning community in the south were hes from.
@Bijyo one, he may be mistaken in the heat of the moment doesn't mean it was a lie (lie is telling something you know not to be true, with the intent to deceive), second, whether he was yelling or not, any justification to push him went out the windows when SHE GOT OUT OF THE VEHICLE and closed the distance between them. The shove was assault (or battery) and could be prosecuted, the others actions don't justify it. The man was approaching him on the ground, the drawing of the gun was also justified. He noticed and started to move away, the SHOT was not justified. Lastly, he was charged and found guilty of manslaughter (agreed, good verdict) not murder. The shot was 100% NOT JUSTIFIED, however, the push was 100% not justified. as for yelling, as long as you are not threatening, and you are yelling at each other, it isn't illegal to tell someone what you think of them breaking the law....having said that, his history would suggest he was doing so with the intent to find an opportunity, and THAT is not justifiable either.
@James W Your whole argument is void for simple fact that the victim would not have been had the murderer just did one simple..mind his business or maybe even call the police non emergency line. Most men heck people would react the same say if someone was threatening your family the guy was in enough distance to pull his fireame and kills how girlfriend..you defend Michael for wanting defend his self but blame the victim for doing the same thing for his family. Think about what you are saying
@Kellen Wheeler No, most people are not that aggressive, not that quick to violence. I get it, this is the new dynamic, if someone mouths off, you can attack them. Again they could have flipped him off, left and spent the entire ride home complaining about white people not minding their own business and caring about stupid things like parking...they are going to park wherever they want. If they had done that, he'd be alive. Watch who you go shoving.
@Fenix funny how nobody seems to ask the question, what would've happened if he doesn't have a gun? The shooting was not justified but let's entertain that hypothetical situation.
@MoahGentle not much, even before the gun, it doesn't look like the victime had any intention of further aggressing the shooter. Plus it is broad daylight and there are clearly plenty of people around that could have come to help him if he'd actually been beaten up
@James W he did it because he saw this individual was yelling through the driver window at the mother of his children. Don't sit there and say "he did it because he could"
1 like
James W2021-06-12 18:11:45 (edited 2021-06-12 18:15:09 )
@Bobby Sells from what we do know, she was almost certainly shouting back at him too. I don't know where you guys live but the entire world isn't Harlem, outside of the hood you can't attack and use violence against anyone you perceive as having disrespected you or your girl in any way. Enough with this silly macho man I'm a badass chest banging, if we all lived like that we'd scarcely go 15 minutes without seeing a brawl in the street. This is not the rec-yard at the penitentiary.
@James W not a good idea to have an altercation with a woman with children in a car without taking in account that you could stumble upon the man and be pushed by him cos he might feel something bad in your attitude towards the family.
@K. A. Benitez I mean, all cases of use of a firearm in self defense are treated like this, so most gun owners will watch videos or go to classes to understand where/when they are legally allowed to carry, what the circumstances are for when it's legal to draw, and when to make the decision to pull the trigger and what to do following such an occurrence. I don't necessarily see it as a red flag that he knew the terminology, at least aside from other evidence. Having drawn 4 times previously, it does make it more damning. Despite all this, he still didn't say the right things
@Fenix I think it's much more complicated than that, how would you feel if a guy was at the window if your car yelling at your wife while your kid was also in there? I'd be furious. Then if I was pushed from behind, I'd def be afraid that it would continue while I was on the ground
@James W yes she probably was shouting. a strange man is approaching and circling her car, why would she not? He initiated the situation, before further escalating it by pulling out a deadly weapon. He was the threat, and what do people do when they feel threatened?
@Yaya G. You could say he was being annoying, but it's not against the law to walk around someone's car, it's not against the law to be annoying, it's not against the law to be overly zealous in wanting traffic/parking laws to be enforced. He hasn't done anything that indicated he was a threat to actually physically harm anyone. The is not the rec yard at the penitentiary, you can't attack someone simply for being annoying or bothering your girl. So he would have had to said a verbal threats or said something that amounts to an incitment to violence. I'd let's say the man was shouting derogatory racist dribble at them, you could argue that would be a incitment to violence, it's something that could cause an otherwise rational person to became so enraged that it's a provocation. We don't have that here, we have a guy being nosey about how their car was parked. You probably have mutual shouting on both sides, The gun: so yeah it's easy for us to sit back and watch the video and critique what happened and what would have been the better options. Things aren't so simple or cut and dry in the moment. When you are attacked like that your body releases a rush of adrenaline and the fight or flight response takes over and it's almost a totally automated response. Throughout most of human evolution the world was often a very hostile places, there were no police or judges to sit in judgment of a violent encounter. If upon attack you strike hard and fast, you are going to have a better chance to walk away front the incident, every moment you delay makes it more likely you don't walk away alive. This is just the reality of the situation.
@James W actually what he was doing could very well be elevated to a crime. Its called harrassment, and she had every right to tell him off, or to even call the cops. Once he saw that she wasn't moving, he should have left. But instead, he decides to stay there and shout at her. Now he's a threat. And as I said, we know what people do when they feel threatened.
@James W also he was only pushed, which is to be expected when your shouting at someone. Again, the blame comes back to him for initiating the shouting and making himself a threat.
@Yaya G. we don't know who started shouting or precisely what was said. We would just be speculating. The most rational series of events was probably that: he was seen walking around the car, she knew they were illegal parked and she wanted to know what he was going to do about it, if he was a cop etc. If he started the verbal exchange it would have most likely been a remark about their illegal park job. Yes I know, why would anyone care? They could have flipped him off, told him to eat shyt and mind his own business. They could have spent the entire car ride home complaining about white people for caring about dumb parking laws. Except that's not what happened. We had a guy mistake the free world for the prison rec yard where it's expected that you attack anyone who slights you in any way or you lose respect or however their prison rules work. The difference is, you can be pretty sure in the rec yard that the person who looked at you the wrong way won't pull a gun on you when you go to knock him out. If they are armed it's usually going to be small jabbing or slicing blades. It not common for them to carry a 9mm. Regardless of who's fault you think it is, or who is more to blame in this situation, the man is still dead. Had he not been so hyper-aggressive he'd almost certainly be alive. You could probably get away with shoving 99% of people without getting killed in retaliation, he picked the wrong guy on the wrong day.
@Yaya G. There is no crime in Florida called "harassment". Even in a states that have such laws, I don't think anyone would consider just telling someone they did something illegal would constitute harassment. It's not against the law to not mind your own business. You just wouldn't have enough time in this case to approach that. Harassment would be an ongoing course of conduct. For example in a state that does have such laws: If they had got in the car and drive off and he followed them all the way home, blaring his horn and shouting at them and anyone who could hear about their illegal parking.
@B leck nope- it was 2012 to 2014 and all pulled on other drivers.. as if it matters, you think everyone who has a gun more than 23 years will inevitably pull it on a pregnant woman and her children in he car while driving? Or 20 years? How long have you had your gun? Have you done it yet?
@MarquiseTheFirst his life wasn’t in danger. If he was pushed down and started to get beaten, it would have been justified. But the fact that he backs away after the gun is drawn just shows that this was excusable homicide...
Dude was blindsided and taken off his feet. Could have yelled as soon as he saw what was happening. But nah, quietly crept up on him.The shooting wasn't self defense but the victim wanted to be a tough guy and paid the price. Your life is more valuable than some posturing.
@YouJustAmazeMe Yes however he shot him after he was clearly moving back, if someone is moving back they are not a threat to your life (for the most part) looking at his body language once the gun came out he was in a submissive and in flight mode. I’m sure you have made mistakes in your life, the victim did as well, but does that mean you need to die for it?
@Gvistic Read my comment again. I said the shooting wasn't in self defense. The rest of your comment has nothing to do with anything I said. All you did was describe the video. Which by the way, I watched too.
@YouJustAmazeMe The part of your comment that warranted my response, was that "he paid the price" so he paid the price of death for trying to protect his family?
@Gvistic this is the last time I will respond to you, because your reading comprehension is not my responsibility. He "paid the price" for posturing as a tough guy. Again, he could have yelled at the man as soon as he saw what was happening. Telling a freak to get away from your family IS defending them, and from there he can assess the situation and decide how to handle it. Stop painting it black and white like he didn't have more wise and careful decisions available to him.
@YouJustAmazeMe U know when u say "He "paid the price" for posturing as a tough guy" ur pretty much justifying someone shoting him even if ur saying its not self defence. Sure you could say his actions where bad, but nowhere bad enough to say he deserved death. I think even if he started kicking him and shit, it wouldnt warrant killing him becuse that would still be a massive excessive force becuse you know there is alot better ways to break up a figth that doesnt result in shooting someone.
@Andor if he did in fact start moving towards Drejka that would be enough of a ground for a pretty simple defense to get him out of it. If person1, having no opportunity to disengage, demonstrates lethal intent by pulling out a gun and explicitly warning person2 about that intent, they expect the other side to act accordingly to that knowledge, and if person2 reacts to it by closing the distance, it's safe to assume for person1 that person2 has acknowledged the lethal outcome of the situation and has something they could respond with, likely on a lethal / great bodily harm level. However, if person2 is demonstrating any signs of disengagement, all the easy self defense routes are off the table. Had Drejka not told the policemen that he wouldn't have a reason to shoot if Markeis hadn't continued the approach, maybe a good defense attorney could figure out a line, I'll take JCS's word on that. But the fact there was no warning and the victim was retreating put the final nail in the coffin, not that he would "only" get beaten the shit out of. Physical assault is a serious threat to your autonomy and shouldn't be taken lightly if you agree with your right to defend yourself, so if you could prove you perceived no realistic ways to escape, you're justified in showing a gun and demonstrating and voicing your lethal intent, and carrying through with it in case the assault continues. You should study the laws in your specific state in case they differ in any way though before you practice anything of what I said, I'm in no way qualified to make any suggestions, just basing what I'm saying off of some prior cases and the rights you're supposed to have on paper.
@Andor I don't think he said he "deserved" to die. But the guy did "pay the price" for acting though... Meaning that him getting shot was a direct consequence of that. Not that he deserved. Not that it was justified. But it was the price paid.
@Pig Parade You are right, in the end all that matters is that a family lost a loved one without a reason... But even so, I think it is important to reflect about the behavior of the guy that pushed, if only so that you wouldnt do something like that, because it could be avoided if he acted differently.
Edit: I am not in anyway whatsoever justifying the behavior of the guy that shot, just to be clear.
@Z_ROck yeah. There is that long pause after the draw where the decedent steps back and angles his body away. Hands visible. It is a bad shooting, meaning unjustified.
@YouJustAmazeMe or here's an idea; if you mind your business and let people deal with their own choices maybe you won't get pushed for not staying out of other people's business.
@Z_ROck if he shot him 2 seconds earlier this wpuld have been justified. The moment he paused and realized the threat was over was where he made his mistake
Wonder if the gf got the fine for illegally parking in a handicapped spot? Orrrr why was this great dad on ecstasy? Less then 5 seconds all that happened wise ones, and before the guy who got shot saw that a weapon was being pulled he was hovering a few feet from the guy. The guy reacted. I wonder what would have happened if he didnt have a gun. Oh wait ive seen what happens when someone gets blindsided unarmed the aftermath isnt pretty. And it wasnt defended as a stand ur ground case.
Cop: “I saw the video and he did not take a step toward you. He was moving back” POS: “I would disagree” Cop: “Sir...I’m not sure you understand...it’s a video. Disagreement is actually not one of your options”
He did take steps towards him. Watch the video. The assaulter violently shoves, approaches, sees the gun being pulled, then backs up. Within less than 3 seconds the old guy who was violently shoved to the pavement had to recognize that he no longer needed to fire at the assailant who was backing away. He didn't recognize, so now he is in jail for 20yrs.
@KuhEssen He was not moving towards him after he pulled out the gun but he says he did. He is either misremembering or simply lying. It's also pretty hard to believe he did not "recognize" that his gun was no longer needed. When you pull out a gun and somebody walks away from you there is simply no reason to think you have to shoot. He had enough time to asses the situation and at that point nothing was threatening him. He had the upper hand and used it to retaliate for beeing pushed.
@KuhEssen first, marquis wasn’t the assaulter. He was getting a man away from his wife using non deadly force. He pushed him away and that was that he didn’t try and attack him or anything. Drejka then shoots at a man who is walking away from him—drejka knows damn well marquis wouldn’t have killed him if he didn’t shoot your comment Is ridiculous
@KuhEssen drejka is the start of the confrontation point blank. Why start an argument with a woman who has children in her car? The empty spots in the front of the store would have been easily accessible to a handicap person as they are usually in front. He had no reason to police where someone parked it wasn’t his business and if he was that concerned he coulda called the cops. You’re defending someone who quite clearly has been waiting for this opportunity
@Boarmans world Most of these responses to my comments are disagreements about whether he had time to react and decide he did not need to shoot after being violently shoved to the pavement in his old age and being approached as a follow up. Even the prosecution concedes the threat justified pulling his gun. Until people backed away, the threat justified firing the gun too. With perfect information maybe the shooter would have used restraint to preserve life. I could say the same thing about the assailant who violently shoved him to the pavement. Being shoved off balance like that into the pavement can end your life. Also, this is tangential, but the assailant's kids were in the store not the car.
@KuhEssen in the first minute of the video, up to 1:07 or so, it is very clearly stated that marquis had 3 children, all under 6, in the car, and that he took only his 5 year old son in to the store. The other two children are not mentioned as having gone in to the store, and as such can safely be presumed to be still in the car. "in the passenger seat was her 28 year old boyfriend Marquis McLaughlin, while in the backseat were their three children, who were all under the age of six at the time. When they got to the store Brittany parked the vehicle in the stores only handicapped parking space located on the side of the building. Marquis then got out and went into the store with their five-year-old son[...]"
@Robert Sorry guy, but that was a lot of red herring. I am just going off the facts of the case. I agree that if he decided to shoot to kill a retreating assailant, then he was in the wrong. I am not confident that he decided that since he was probably disoriented, but could be! I am still surprised by the verdict, except for that the shooter had a big mouth an incriminated himself.
@Jordon Houston Would I be okay with being shot? I don't think it is about being okay with that. It is about whether it was justified and reasonable. I would not violently sucker-punch-style shove an old guy into the pavement without saying a word to him. If I did, I would go to jail.
@KuhEssen A sucker punch is a punch, intended to do damage. A shove is intended to create distance. If someone was having a heated argument and was directing aggression towards your family, I'd say you would be justified in shoving someone away. Deadly force is not the appropriate response to a shove.
Well he created an altercation, escalated the situatuon, used very excessive force and murdered an unarmed black man. I’m surprised they didn’t deputize him on the spot, to be honest.
@Crispy . because there is a whole lot of racist white people with that guys exact attitude so it's very likely that the victim being black had alot to do with it
Tbh if he's auditioning to be a cop, he passed with flying colors. Shooting an unarmed black man gets you passed the academy and into a cruiser real quick.
@Rodgerwilco91 6 unarmed black men were killed by police last year. Most resisted arrest. The others resulted in police being criminalized. There are millions of police interactions with black people every month.
Honestly this is one of the kinds of people I hate the most, people who buy a gun and fantasise about using it for self defence, being the hero. People who think they're some mini commando. Because when they get into a situation like this, they'll definitely pull the trigger.
I understand 100% but this is the US were a gun culture and built around them. If somebody gets shot. They get shot. If somebody dies in a car wreck they die in a car wreck.
People say that watching action movies isn’t harmful. And while I don’t think it turns people to serial killers it can confuse people on what is law on when you can use a gun. People like him assume the gun can be used even with mildest threats, and not only when it’s a question of life and death.
@promontorium ? This guy wasn't handicapped either. He says in-video he has a "pet peeve" about people parking in the handicapped space, likely because his mother-in-law is handicapped.
It doesn't matter what a single persons opinion is. You will not take our guns. Your will not make any gun laws restricting our guns. Freedom will win.
@Autumn Contingency let me guess you are below six foot and post pride month on your story… I am surprised that you have watched this video (and have proven that by citing the camera recording) and do not seem to realize that he fired out of fear. He clearly states that he thought the man who just got physical (out of no where and for no justifiable reason; words would have been fine to “protect” his family) was advancing towards him. It is all about HIS perspective because humans do not have omnipresent views and that is probably indeed what he saw when he finally looked up and broke out of shock.
I can’t wait to read what an ape below the 99th percentile of intelligence has to respond so please make it quick.
@Autumn Contingency in case you have not been outside, when you get randomly blindsided not a lot of things go on in your brain correctly. I know it is hard to understand for someone who has probably left their basement once every week to get food, but in the real world there is no such thing as perfect judgement. You are using hindsight bias too liberally in his situation. (Im not sure you know what google is, so the definition is when you judge events based off of information received after the fact) He got pushed on to the ground, his brain won’t be going “okay let’s analyze the threat and what’s happening”… he is going straight into self defense. Like I said this may not make sense for someone who doesn’t leave their parents basement once but every week for food but this is how it works in the real world buddy. Fight or flight. Im sure the hardest “fight” you’ve ever been in is the one against diabetes, so don’t try too hard to understand what I’m typing.
@Autumn Contingency in case you have not been outside, when you get randomly blindsided not a lot of things go on in your brain correctly. I know it is hard to understand for someone who has probably left their basement once every week to get food, but in the real world there is no such thing as perfect judgement. You are using hindsight bias too liberally in his situation. (Im not sure you know what google is, so the definition is when you judge events based off of information received after the fact) He got pushed on to the ground, his brain won’t be going “okay let’s analyze the threat and what’s happening”… he is going straight into self defense. Like I said this may not make sense for someone who doesn’t leave their parents basement once but every week for food but this is how it works in the real world buddy. Fight or flight. Im sure the hardest “fight” you’ve ever been in is the one against diabetes, so don’t try too hard to understand what I’m typing.
@Will H I mean, living in parent’s basement seems far better than having no parents to teach you a shred of empathy for other human beings. After all, if you did have empathy, you wouldn’t be making this lonely argument with insults you practiced in the shower before typing this. 😴😭😭
Sara Samaletdin the basic laws you need to know to be a productive responsible member of society, should be taught in high school. Even citizens who have no plans to own a gun should be educated in gun safety.
@Canavero any law formed against the second amendment is unconstitutional. Just like the national firearms Act of 1936 which made it illegal for felons to own firearms.
The other people were at fault. Micheal is a good guy who wanted to make sure people weren't preventing disabled people from parking. The other two cases were people who were naughty people and needed go be neutralized.
George Zimmerman is that you ? He was choked that "they" were at "his" cornerstore in "his" neighborhood, and what are "they" doing there ? He seized the opportunity to play neighborhood cop in order to discourage "them" from coming into "his" neighborhood again, by harrassing them....playing it off like he's doing the store management and the neighborhood a favor, and likely expected affirmation by others. Thus, after fully embracing the starring role as the armed neighborhood racist bully....he falls shamelessly backwards into the character of the helpless victim, though he was superman 2 minutes ago. I believe he was looking for a confrontation where he could brandish his weapon to scare them away, and he shot the husband purely out of retribution for ending the power trip he was waging on the man's wife. He instantly lost all his power and lost face in front of everybody present, so he makes a move to reclaim power and control of the situation. It has nothing to do with self defence.
I like how he was all worried about that handicap parking spot seeing as he just pulls in and illegally parks his vehicle in an unmarked area that is definitely NOT a parking spot. Guess when you’re the parking lot protector the same rules don’t apply to you 🤷🏽♀️
Its only illegal to park in a handicap spot. It's not illegal to park anywhere els in a parking lot. There are no laws saying where you can park (except the handicap spot). It's not a public street. That being said who gives a shit if the guy was illegally parked in the handicap spot.
@Diddley Squat that’s not how it works old man you can park between lines, in the middle of the parking lot, on the curb, etc. there’s a reason there’s lines displaying where you can park. What they both did was illegal if a non serious crime expect for the trigger happy murder
@Pie I'm not defending the shooting at all. A cop can't give you a ticket for parking there. A cop can give you a ticket for parking in a handicap spot. They can call the cops to get them to have ask the guy to leave, and if he doesn't he can get a trespassing charge. He can't get a ticket for parking anywhere in the lot, other than the handicap spot. The city didn't put those lines there, the owners did.
@Adriana Villarreal Lopez lol no it's not watch it again. He said that it was his the way you would say that's my school. The actual owner even said he's a reoccurring "customer"
@Pie i was referring to him telling the officer that it was his store and that he was a regular lol i know it’s not actually his store that’s why i put (/s which means sarcasm)
@Diddley Squat you are correct. It’s private property and it’s not illegal to park over the lines or with a tire on the curb... whatever. It is illegal to park in an area designated as handicapped parking.
It would be illegal to double park, take up two spots, park on the sidewalk, etc., on public property or “government property” like city streets.
Most people don’t understand this. I would encourage everyone to read their local and state laws.
@Pie I was responding to somebody that said beating a chick to a pulp was alpha. I told him no alpha is a leader that takes care of people. Alpha doesn't mean you're the baddest in the room. What's wrong with that?
As a black person this was a self defense but his mistake was instigating the pushing which makes the self defense invalid. Keep your hands to yourself, no verbal argument should warrant you putting hands on anyone.
This guy got convicted of manslaughter but an underage boy who committed a federal offense by crossing state lines with an unregistered to kill some has all his charges dropped.
This is self defense, he was only convicted because of the skin color of the person he killed.
Pretty cringe the guy talking about all the “drills” and scanning for threats and saying affirmative and neutralise.. especially when he has no military or police background.
He was looking for someone to shoot. Honestly, some people take patriotism too far and start having military fantasies about how they "protect and serve" their communities. This guy's having a power trip cause he's got a gun and he thinks he something near police. A family lost their father over that. Disgusting.
You realize in the military we don't talk like robots right😂 thats just shit that nerds and rejects say cus they saw it in a movie.. common misconception
Funny you say that, I've noticed the only people I have ever heard casually talk like this either had no or very little background in police/military..while everybody I have met who actually did have such backgrounds are personable and try to be casually relatable, instead of impressive.
@jessica romanoff agreed, so many places without guns that are doing just fine, and even then it's not that the US should just completely ban them, but it definitely should be a bit more difficult to obtain a gun.
Guns won't kill people, but they sure do make it easier.
@A Guy Named Something Neutralise is the English way of saying it, and considering the language is English, you are probably more wrong than he is. lol
He probably would have got head stomped if he would have not had a firearm,but handicapped illegal parking confrontation??? I would have just went in the store.
@Epoch of An Era I didn't call the poster a narcissist, I called the criminal a narcissist. And if you looked up the definition, you would agree that the criminal IS a narcissist
@Epoch of An Era look up the definition of a narcissist. I am not throwing the term around loosely. If you think Michael isn't one, go get your head checked, but he not only matches the definition but reminds me of my birth father who is a diagnosed narcissist
@John Mullin his lawyer did a really bad job in the end.
He only had to say that Michael didn’t see the first step because he was recovering from the push, he didn’t see the second because he was occupied drawing his gun and the 3rd step unfortunately look to him as a forward step (although in reality it was a turning step). -should have made clear that he was not racist, as the only reason he approached the car was because it was parked in the discapacitated slot and at first Michael was unaware of the family’s race. -should have also made clear that he didn’t shoot out of anger. And that the reason there was just 1 round fired is because he no longer felt in danger. - it was a nasty surprise when he learnt that the man he shot died.
And that’s it!!!! The man would be free.
I mean, I still think he shot out of anger but that’s not the point.
@happyfacefries I still haven’t looked it up but I think you’re wrong saying that somebody in your family is medically described as a narcissist. Narcissism as well as hypocrisy can’t be medically measured.
In Spanish we have an other term that’s “megalómano” to which English translation you might have wanted to refer to.
@happyfacefries Thank you, man. Sorry if I misjudged you. It's just that people tend to throw that word around and their actions show how ironic they're being. Case in point, Mr. Educated a.k.a. metaphysicalgrafitti over here.
@Epoch of An Era 80% of people don't even know what narcissism is. I bet they couldn't even recognize most narcissists. Also, narcissism shouldn't be stigmatized as it is a permanent mental condition which brings many disadvantages with it.
@unai_a secas Narcissistic Personality Disorder is literally in the DSM, what are you talking about? Of course it can be medically measured, it's disordered by psychologists.
So basically this guy was angry at someone’s crappy parking decisions YET he himself isn’t even parked in a DESIGNATED PARKING SPOT
1711 likes
Replies (59)
Random Username2020-09-05 12:21:45 (edited 2020-09-05 12:26:24 )
He's special. He has a gun. Who else is going to be the last bad ass left on Earth?
Seriously, though, you're right. That Rittenhouse kid who went off killing people with a gun he should have never had in a community he wasn't from is another case. They're LARPers looking for a reason. And the second comes up, they fire. Probably with the words, "okay man, it's all been leading up to this" going through their mind.
In that other case, the kid had to illegally bring an AR15 across state lines without an FOID card into another community. He was even one of those kid police cadets. The law doesn't matter to those people no matter how much they like to pretend.
Doesn't much matter to me, either, but I've never pretended the "law is blind" or whatever they chant while falling asleep holding the blue line flag.
@senorbeast09 so I can just pull into a parking lot and park my car outside of a designated parking space. Thanks for the tip! You'll pay my parking tickets, yea?
@Random Username correct. you can park wherever you want at a gas station as long as it doesn't impede traffic on public roadways. the worst that will happen is you will be asked to leave for parking like an idiot.
bottom line: Michael didn't "illegally" park, the single mother did, however
Inquisitive Cameron I live in a city and there’s city codes for parking regulations. So what we do here is WE PARK BETWEEN WHITE LINE DESIGNATED PARKING SPOTS
@john dodo well.... Good! lol. I just find these people to be ridiculous. If you want to play Johnny Law, be a cop. I mean, don't, please, but you know what I mean. And if you are going to do some dumb stuff like this, don't start off the bat with blatant hypocrisy.
I'll never get these cop LARPers or the idiots who defend them.
@john dodo oh man, somebody give this intellectual a Nobel Prize, he single-handedly just BTFO any dissenting opinion/counter-argument with one simple trick
@Random Username I think there is a huge difference between Rittenhouse and this case.
In this case, at the sight of a gun the attacker immediately retreated, and was shot while he kept increasing the distance, not facing the person laying down and not showing any intentions to attack.
In case of Rittenhouse , he was running away from attackers, he got pushed and they kept on charging expecting him not to shoot.
Intentions of being armed in both cases are irrelevant. For me Rittenhouse self defense was very rational.
@Random Username Did you have prolonged restrictive breathing in the birthing canal? How can you compare this to the Rittenhouse case? You have a short circuit between what your eyes see and how your brain interprets it. Get help!!
@Random Username Careful, you have inaccurate facts regarding the self defense situation surrounding the incident with the rioters. There's a lot of wrong information floating around from when it first went down that has now been entirely discredited. Using early and often highly inaccurate information, especially from sources such as the mainstream media that feeds off of chaos, to form the basis of your ideology or opinions on topics is dangerous as the information is almost always misleading or wrong when incidents like that happen and not until much later does the more nuanced truth of reality begin to shine through.
@senorbeast09 not a source. But if you want to be technical about it...
In FL, parking lots are considered private property. That, in itself, makes any collisions in said parking lots a lot more difficult to handle. That being said, either neither were parked illegally due to private property, could have called for a tow but that's it.
And as far as asking for a source? That's standard from anyone countering an argument. If you stayed in school and paid attention, you'd know that. So essentially you would then have to go looking for precedent that argues in your favor.
This isn't difficult. I may have been a bit hyperbolic in the legality considering the circumstances of private lots, but not inherently wrong. To say both people were incorrectly parked would be more accurate on a technical level.
Doesn't change anything, dude still went all Evil Barney Fife.
@M Verheul let's not. IDC about trial. I'm not on the jury. I know what happened. I watched what happened. He should have been at home in Illinois with a bedtime.
@Random Username Kyle was a minuteman, not a cop larper, tool. These people were in kenosha helping the police, with their blessing. There with others to prevent damage to buildings (because the people doing it won't want to get shot.) and give first aid. You're comparing a warzone to not a warzone. A violent mob chasing a person to an altercation between two people. You're not very inquisitive. I doubt you could define inquiry.
@Random Username of course you don't care about a trial once you're called out on the bullshit you're spewing. Kyle is a hero, your opinion on that does not change anything.
@William Gruff one can argue that, sure. One would objectively be wrong for solely putting the incident on said couple, but yea, anyone can argue anything. And had the situation played out differently, it may even be agreeable.
I remember recently parking next to a car in the handicapped spot. I got upset someone was parked there... and I went by and looked at the license...and she had a handicap license plate... I felt silly (and thankful). On the other hand, I have seem a restaurant owner go after someone for not legitimately parking in a handicapped spot and made the man move. It was a ugly scene.
@;askoefj k. Not sure how. There are many reports of Kyle brandishing his weapon before hand, he was given water and encouraged by the police, he illegally brought a gun out of state from Illinois to WI without an FOID card, he was the stressor and aggressor by open carrying said illegally brought AR15, and I have merely added the not so illogical conclusion he was there to use his weapon and make his cop daddy's proud. He just needed the perceived excuse. So regardless if you're given that excuse or not is irrelevant.
I get angry when people park in disabled spots without a permit card up because im disabled myself but all i do is take photos of the car and license plates and forward the details to the council to fine them id never actually get into a physical altercation or kill someone over it that’s ridiculous (plus I physically couldn’t even if i wanted to due to my disabilities).
@senorbeast09 doesn't matter. If her parking bothered him that much ...report it and move on. Even the owner of the convenient store told him to stop harassing the customers and the judge who sentenced Drejka said he found it ironic because Drejka himself parked illegally.
@senorbeast09 It still wasn't his job to police the parking lot. He could have taken the plate number and reported it. Michael admits however to doing stuff like this on multiple occasions. Also, pretty sure it's illegal to murder someone. Which Michael did.
@Nrg Bunni - Well, yeah. Of course it's totally unreasonable to SAY something to the aipette... These things are animals who have NO IMPULSE CONTROL, and it got it's ass shot off due to it's unwarranted violent outburst.
@Random Username Did you watch the video's about Kyle? Why start this conversation at all? Really weird to compare this with Kyle.. He actually was there to help. You do know that the only reason people were going after him is because he put out a fire? Then a suspected crazy person with a death wish(literally!) starts to charge him, understandably gets shot. Then an unknown number of people want to lynch him and it doesn't go their way. I suspect you're butthurt because you see yourself as one of those people, but hey, if it went the other way round I'd be mad too. If he was there to mow down people he would have done a hell of a better job
@Dogald Trump Rittenhouse is a different case. The question of whether his life was in danger because he willingly placed himself in a dangerous situation is the one that needs to be answered. From there, it snowballs... If you see someone shoot someone else, and you shoot them, are you justified? If someone tries to detain you after you have used deadly force. do you have the right to self-defense? If he was on private property on behalf of someone, there is no argument. If he was retreating from a demonstration, or even a riot, there is no argument. If people went after him after putting out the dumpster, there is no argument. The lack of experience may have prompted him from leaving the danger to going through the danger to find the safety of the police. One of the big arguments I think will be made is, did Kyle Rittenhouse fear for his life because he was concerned someone would take his weapon and use it on him? That can go the way of 3rd degree murder. It doesn't matter who he was, or who he shot (and their records), the initial circumstance sets the stage for what follows.
@Random Username -Look up the laws in the State you live in. In public parking lots of stores in Florida there is no law that says you HAVE to park in the drawn spaces.
it was taken down by youtube for some violating the terms of service, he is reuploading them now. They were all gone (or at least most of them) for some time.
Yeah, you can see how calm he is. Collective, friendly even. But you can here the subtle tremble in his voice. Not fear, no no, not fear at all. He was mostly honest, eerie in his language. I wouldn’t say he was in the wrong, but neither the right.
@Lord well the point is, if you are blindside hit in public onto concrete, naturally, any humans fight or flight response will kick in, which is survival instinct and you would draw ur weapon almost automatically (especially if he’s telling the truth of carrying a gun more than half of his life).
When he pulled out the gun, it was justified because, well frankly you never know what can happen. What if instead of it being that dad it had been an actual assailant or someone who intended on kicking his ass? That’s why drawing the gun is justified. At that point the interaction peaks and in this case, the father tried to get away and took multiple steps away before being shot.
In conclusion, His reaction to being pushed was justified scientifically and with common sense, however once it continued, it definitely was an evil act of some sort as that man posed absolutely no threat
Even with that guy humblebragging himself in to a conviction, that video evidence was honestly open and shut on his fate. Yeah, the guy pushed him down, but he was clearly not a threat and even was walking away when Michael shot him.
He shot the unarmed gentleman. In the situation he caused, then cry victim in the very situation he created and shoot and kill a unarmed man who tried to back away.
He didnt have any idea he would be assaulted for simply telling someone not to park in a handicap spot. The deceased man broke the law when he assaulted Drejka by the way.
PLEASE post an interrogation where investigators are trying to get a confession but eventually he is proven innocent (like really innocent, not just by law)
usually its 8 hours long interrogations where the innocent is psychologically tortured bc police chose them as guilty. I think Cofession tapes has some cases.
@notsure ifsrs ok, i guess that makes sense, but there is actually no verdict of 'innocent' at law.
Which makes the question even more strange, particularly since 'facts' and 'evidence' get their own special definitions in the courtroom as well.
So, are we talking about being factually innocent as something completely different than what the facts on evidence at trial show?
Or a scenario of wrongful conviction, Where for example DNA evidence exhonerates the accused who was interrogated and confessed and we have that confession on tape. (because that would be interesting to see). Unfortunately wrongful convictions aren't as rare as one might like.
being ajudicated guilty or innocent is a legal concept.
There are actually two that have been posted which fit your description. One was a black dude who was riding a bus who was incorrectly accued. The other was some white lady from Texas if I remember correctly who's boyfriend committed suicide and the cop was screaming at her trying to get her to say she murdered him.
This is why scared people should not carry a guns. He didn't notice any 'threath' by analysing the mans face or body movements, the only thing he noticed is that he was black. That is so telling, scary and sad. I am so glad that i live in a country where these irrational people are not allowed to carry guns.
A verbal confrontation should absolutely never turn into a physical one. As a matter of fact, a strong push such as the one this man experienced could have killed him! I wonder what people would be saying if that push would have killed the white guy and the black guy had never been shot. I suspect the black guy would have experienced a lot more scrutiny. people who solve their problems with their fists are like brute beasts. I am not defending the white guy in the least bit. Both the black and the white guy were wrong! Actually, I'm pretty sure that if the white guy had never pulled out a gun, he more than likely could have pressed charges against the black guy! I have been robbed and roughed up by a group of black guys. I was also beat up pretty badly by one of my ex girlfriend's step dad and I couldn't figure out why! Getting violated in that way is absolutely traumatizing. I dealt with anger for years after that! putting your hands on another human being to inflict harm is a gross violation of their basic human rights. most of you have your morals all screwed up that's why this world is so screwed up
@J.RABBIT its meant for people with disabilities only. (to make it easier for them) meaning people shouldnt park there if they dont have a disability thats all.
@J.RABBIT the handicapped parking spot is usually located closer to the entrance of the store so that it's easily accessible without needing to walk a long distance, so it should be right in front of the convenience store (or closest spot to the entrance for other locations) but it's actually furthest away. It's meant for people with disabilities, and parking there if you don't have a disability takes away the access from people who need it.
That's probably because the store and the building is old and the ramp up to the sidewalk was put in later to bring the building up to code, therefore the place they built the ramp dictated where they put the handicap spot.
Possibly an answer? The corner of a sidewalk is the easiest and safest spot to drop the curb down so wheelchairs can get onto it. I'm pretty sure some city codes require curbs in front of a glass store- fronts to be high enough that a parked vehicle can't roll up and smash it.
I can see there is a ramp there, and there is a bright (probably yellow) colored step in the spots in front of the door, not to mention it's to tight to squeeze a wheelchair through those parking curbs
@JRugg1 1980 We can talk how it should never have escalated to him shooting the guy in the first place because of a Handicap Parking spot.
He can inform whoever else that suppose to deal with that kind of stuff; the store's clerk, a Parking Warden, or... You know... The police... after he reminded the woman inside the car to move Instead of Arguing with a woman like an Idiot. He can inform the dude, whose also unarmed mind you, that pushed him that he's packing by either verbally saying it and/or show the holstered gun, which a Licensed and Trained Gun owner should do according to their Rule of Conduct when they are confronted with a Bystander.
But of course, Illegal parking should be sanctioned by death I guess
As someone who has to drive a wheelchair bound person around I honestly love the spots that are off to the side (assuming they have cordoned off space to pull a wheelchair ramp out of the vehicle.) Feel less guilty about taking up 2 prime spots by the doors. Obviously not for every disabled person as some can still walk.
Good point and one the Judge made but it remains illegal for somebody without handicap tags to park there so that was violation #1 followed by McGlockton assaulting Drejka which was violation #2.
It looks like that there is a ramp right next to the spot. So it makes sense for that specific parking spot to be the handicap one. Agreed that it should be closer to the main entrance but as far as I know near the ramp is where it's technically supposed to be.
Exactly...The sad thing is if he was an off duty cop he would be walking around free. This dude thought was was going to get the same special treatment that police officers get after they pull the trigger.
@DrNogueiras I'd actually love to have an extensive collection of pink and purple guns. Just imagine that. Maybe some kittens and puppies on them, too, who knows. Gotta embrace the stereotype amirite :P
@DrNogueiras Sorry, I didn't know that vague book you wrote in the comment box was supposed to be a comparison to anything that actually happened. I guess everything can be related to zimmerman if you simplify it enough.
@DrNogueiras Oh my gosh, I'd love to see those! Do you have any pictures of them to share? :3 and nah, I'm not fussed, 'men' who berate women are dumb and boring and need to sit down :D I'm sure he's a mommy's boy anyway :P
@Baruuu100 I'm not an incel, but sick burn! I was referring to elena. There I fixed it. I just know the type. Guns should be respected not something you collect in every color. I was correct as well.
@DrNogueiras Maybe you should look up the buzzwords because you were doing just that. Dude was convicted in some kangaroo court after his case was all over the local news... I watched the video I never saw him screaming. She actually escalated the situation by getting out of the car. Amazing how she "is backed up by complete strangers" as she gets out of the car to yell backwhile your good guy attacks. Lets not minimize physical violence, that's what started the whole deal. Anyway if the dude was waving guns around before he should go away for that, not for defending himself. 20 is crazy.
ok i get it. so if you warn somebody not to use the handicapped spot or call out someone for behaving unlawfully, which is bedides compulsory for every citizen, then you are a wannabe cop... interesting, now we know this too. what else? free LCD TVs?
He's a weak angry man who thinks he's tough for no other reason that he had a gun and the ability to kill anyone who stood up to him after he initiated a confrontation
@Timmy Vawwter it's too bad that he didn't lawyer up. a better outcome would have resulted.
A better outcome for him, but not for society. Dude has a history, and while I don't think he should have been shoved to the ground he did kind of initiate the entire chain of events that led to his own demise.
I'm always amazes me how investigators are calm ,friendly, like they're buddies with murderers of the worst kind. They'll sit face to face with child molester murderers and are able to maintain their calmness. They teach me to be calm in such a chaotic world.
Exactly my thoughts. It would be a hell of an effort for me to stay zen while facing a criminal racist piece of shit who thought he did the right thing.
What amazes me even more, is the fact that these criminals never seem to understand that they are being played by the interragators. These ppl think the police are their friend and are on their side, when they are the exact opposite.
I agree, although this was a heat of the moment situation between two adults which in my opinion is different to a man who has stalked, plotted, sexually assaulted then murdered a defenceless female victim or worse still a child as we have seen in other JCS videos. In some cases the victims were even dismembered.
the calmer they are, the more likely these horrible people will end up convicted
6 likes
frank enns2022-03-20 21:20:14 (edited 2022-03-20 21:22:23 )
You should watch the detective interrogating The amazon killer aka Todd Kohlhepp. He (the detective) makes the murderer so calm and friendly that he (the murderer) literally admits to every single thing he’s done lol it’s infuriating to watch how he’s treated (the killer) even fed like a king. Until you realize it’s all an act to get him to confess
@Iv JO My phsyce wouldn't be as layed back as these guys lol These guys are detectives and phsychologists . I watched the Chris Watts interrogation holy mother i was blown away how calm they are sitting 3 ft across from a guy who killed his pregnant wife and 2 children. I know they're phsycologically trained in dealing with criminals and murderers...I couldn't.
Anger and fear can cloud judgement. Just like how the defendants fear & anger clouded his judgement right before he pulled the trigger. I'm sure there's a relevant "Yoda" quote about fear and anger but I can't think of it.
Dude had to sit there thinking “wait, so this guy’s about to tell me a whole story explaining how/why he shot someone because they were parked in the handicap and pushed you down?”
Isn't part of their training to pretend they're calm and somewhat friendly, so they make sure the suspect gives enough information? Or am I wrong? I see it as completely performative and I am sure most of them must have a really strong composure to deal with every case.
@Kalypso Theodoreskou Yes of coarse, it's part of their training. What I meant was,when I watch detectives calm and collect, with the most vile murderers ,it makes me want to practice to be as calm in these crazy times we are living in,with some nutty people out there.The nuttiest we've seen in our lifetime. As for detectives in a box size room,with say a child molester serial killer? God bless them for their patience....I couldn't.
I think its easy. Think about it, cops are probably suspicious about this guy's intent. They probably saw the camera footage first before interrogation and can immediately tell this guy is sus. So the key to getting the suspect to getting arrested is to play buddy. It puts the suspect in a false state of security and will make them admit things that they normally wouldnt disclose. That is the key to criminal interrogation and psychology. Its not for everyone but the ones that are able to play friend tend to excel in this line of work.
For anyone defending this guy, take this into consideration. This dude illegally parks his car to scream at that lady for illegaly parking. Also, this guy was a public menace. This was the 5th recorded incident of him pulling a gun out on someone, 2 of the previous people were unarmed women. I think he's been dying for an excuse to shoot someone for a long time and he finaly put himself in a situation where he thought he'd get away with it.
Cj Looklin2020-08-05 16:32:09 (edited 2020-08-05 16:52:27 )
@L Vader Ok, let me make sure I understand. By saying that Markeis "assaulted" first, you agree that some form of escalation is warrented or should be expected. Maybe not murder, but something, right? HOWEVER, Michael is the one who assaulted first, he was yelling at his wife in a "threating", "angry", and "authorative" maner. The husband hears, a comotion doesn't know the context, but sees an angry man yelling at his wife (In the south, I may add), so he uses his arms as a "force multiplier" to neutralize the threat to his family. Why shouldn't Michael have expected escalation when HE is the one who started the confrontation? Following your logic, why doesn't Michael recieve all the blame for starting the incedent in the first place?
Let's look at this objectively, he was only PUSHED to the ground, he was not met with lethal force by the victim. While he probably felt embarrassed and emasculated, that was no reason to kill the man. Drejka could of likely had an assault case against him had he not killed him. He didn't pull a weapon out or anything. While yes, he shouldn't of pushed the man to the ground, Drejka should of just minded his own damn business.
@L Vader and a crazy man parking illegally and screaming at a woman with children in the car is bringing thug energy before her boyfriend even arrived. The boyfriend pushed a thug who was harassing his family. How did you miss that fact?
@beakt A thug? For defending his family? I doubt Markeis would have immediately resorted to violence, without talking, if Michaels had first directed his vitriol towards him.
Exactly.. He absolutely did NOT have to shoot that man. Yes he got pushed, but he did not have to use deadly force. The victim obviously pushed him and took 2 paces back (everyone can see that). The victim did not take even one step towards him.. Was definitely unlawful for him to shoot the man.
L Vader I agree with what you said, except calling him a thug. I don’t think he was a thug. If McGlockton was a thug then so was Drejka. Where is the line between being a thug and being protective of your family? I think McGlockton overreacted , he was standing in the store and heard Robert Costello come in and tell the Store owner, “ There’s an altercation out there, you’d better intervene.” That’s what Robert Costelli testified he said ....the lady who was in the store at the same time, Vicky Conrad, who also testified said that Costelli had said “ there’s a problem out there, you’d better go check...” in either event, Costelli entered the store and implied something dramatic was happening in the parking lot and required the Store owner’s assistance. Most likely this caused McGlockton concern knowing his partner and two young babies were out there. Conrad also testified that she could hear the yelling from inside the store. Whatever the level of yelling, when McGlockton went out of the store. Costelli felt the need to go after him and was ready to intervene if necessary. This tells me that whatever Costelli said greatly concerned Markeis and when he went out and saw Drejka yelling at his girlfriend, and as he walked over, his concern and need to get Drejka away from Brittany was the only thing on his mind. All he knew at that point was that a guy had come in to the store very concerned about an altercation in the parking lot, he goes out and sees it’s right at his car with his partner and babies, Drejka was most likely still yelling as he didn’t see Markeis coming his way. Markeis‘ instinct was to shove the guy away from Brittany, who by that time had gotten out of the car. Now, I don’t agree with Markeis just coming up behind Drejka and shoving him. It was a very hard shove, and since Drejka was blindsided he didn’t have any chance to stop the impact of hitting the ground. Markeis absolutely should have stopped and told Drejka to talk to him about the issue, not Brittany. Now that doesn’t diminish Drejka’s mistake either. Drejka should not have approached Brittany and the car. Plain and simple, he was in the wrong. Especially after it was discovered that the Store owner had specifically asked Drejka NOT to accost the customers who parked in that handicap spot without the proper placards. We also learned that Drejka had a ha it of approaching cars and drivers and reprimanding them for parking there. Drejka is not the handicap parking police, as much as he wants to think he is. Approaching a woman alone in her car with the specific purpose of telling her she doing something wrong is completely inappropriate. After Markeis shoved Drejka he does in fact take two steps towards Drejka but to me it seemed to be more out of the continuing momentum of his body going forward, part of the same action as the shove. Then, he stops. Drejka rolls up and already has the gun in his hand and shoots. When Drejka shot, Markeis was not moving forward at all. This is Drejka tragic mistake. Had Drejka sat up with the gun in hand and stopped, everything would have turned out differently. Instead, he shot without waiting for his brain to register that Markeis had stopped moving. Markeis was in the process of turning away from Drejka when the gun was shot. I don’t think Markeis was in the right to shove Drejka and had Drejka slowed his panic, taken just a few seconds to analyze what was happening he would have realized he didn’t need to shoot. There were multiple witnesses, he could have called for help, Costelli was right there, and he could have called 911 and since it was all on video which Drejka knew already, he would have had a pretty solid case for assault. However, it’s my opinion that Drejka knew he had been told by the Store owner not to approach cars illegally parked, he knew he had already been involved in at least 5 separate incidents doing the exact same thing he just did, he knew wasn’t supposed to be approaching people and reprimanding them and he said as much in the February incident with Rick Kelly. He told police at that time “ he couldn’t help himself” from doing this. He admitted that reprimanding people for parking in Handicap spots was his “ hobby”. Drejka is another example of a white man with a gun actually creating the entire situation that caused him to feel the. Need to “ Stand his ground”. Like Michael Dunn, who yelled at 4 black teens to turn down their music , their “ thug” music , as he called it. An argument ensued that completely manufactured by Dunn, and he then shoots at the car 8 times because he “ felt threatened”. Then drove away, went to his hotel, ordered a pizza and made a stiff rum and coke, all the while never calling 911. The McMichels, in the Ahmaud Arbery case, they got guns, jumped into their trucks and tried to corral Arbery ( which is illegal detainment and kidnapping) and then when Arbery was shot by their shotgun it was because he was attacking them? George Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin in the dark rainy night, stalked him, and then when Trayvon tried to get Zimmerman to leave him alone, Zimmerman shot him and claimed self defense? So, my point is that in all of these cases and hundreds of others, the “ shooter” actually created the altercation and then claim self defense when the victim tried to “ stand their ground”. Drejka was a wannabe law enforcement officer who wasn’t one, he pulled a gun and killed a man ...had Drejka not been carrying a gun none of this would have happened, and I doubt he even would have gone up to Brittany in the first place. The gun gave him a false sense of courage.
11 likes
Cj Looklin2020-08-06 01:03:14 (edited 2020-08-06 01:04:45 )
@Paul Ok, "Verbaly Assailing", are you happy now? Not entirely sure what kind of point you're trying to make, you kind of look like a troll tbh.
@Cj Looklin Odd, I remember typing a reply today, but it's gone. Anyway, yes, it's a thug move to shove someone so hard to the ground in that situation. I mean, anyone would be pissed seeing some asshole standing there yelling at your wife with your babies in the car, but you can't go broadsiding him like that. McGlockton would have been charged with assault and battery at least, and if he had seriously injured Drejka, which could easily have happened, felonies. As it turns out, he learned a lesson that when you overreact so violently, you never know when you've just provoked a sociopath with a gun. He only had a few moments to ponder his lesson, though, before his life was over.
@Paul It's exhausting dealing with you people, these will be my last responses. Michael was a dangerous pyscopath that seemed to get off on provoking people into confrontations that he himself started, then pulling his gun on them, waiting for a chance to gun them down. He has done this at least 5 times, (I say at least because not everyone files a police report), and all of his victims were black, hence the reasonable assumption he was a racist. You can believe he was not, but honestly it would take a lot more effort to prove otherwise. It seems you are more concerned that the 5th recorded individual, that is Mcglockton, was succesfully provoked into a violent altercation, than you are with the fact that this lunatic has repeatedly done this within his community. I can't discern your reasons for thinking this way, but I assume it's some combination of smug sophistry, Trolling, or infact being a racist yourself. Only your conscious can know the truth. As to me being a loon. I suppose my lunacy derives for me being better able to empathize with a man overreacting to a percieved threat to his family (Remeber, that this has occured many times, even within the same year, and it is possible that Markies had seen Michael pull a gun out on an unarmed black women before), than a man who is willing to kill someone over a parking spot. But, I shall have you know if that's the case then I take pride in being a "loon". Good day.
@beakt Yes, mcglockten overreacted and that was not smart. Emotion has a way of clowding ones judgement. I still don't understand your insistance on blaming the victim. Lastly, I'll direct you to my comment up above, incase you feel the need to engage further with me.
@Psalm If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it's probabaly a duck. This man has pulled his gun on many unarmed black men and women in this community. Quite frankly it's astounding to assume he his anything other than a racist and the burden of proof lies on you to prove otherwise. If you do manage to find proof he wasn't a racist I will be compelled enough to engage with you in further discussion.
If that was true, why didn't the cops take the gun away from him?
0 likes
Cj Looklin2020-08-06 05:53:51 (edited 2020-08-06 05:54:20 )
@Jenny clark Ask the police, did you even watch the video? One of those 4 other people even testified. Do you think they'd let him Take the stand if he bullshiting? I guess the police were just willing to give hime the benefit of the doubt. There are plenty of articles on this subject
The simple fact that the guy was clearly backing away the instant the gun was pulled when he was shot, that wasn't out of self-defense, he just wanted to shoot him in spite. There's not way to justify it, he did not handle his firearm in a responsible and level-headed manner and killed someone because of it.
@Cj Looklin "Blaming the victim" is a loaded statement that doesn't aid discourse. It implies only one or the other can be wrong. Both were wrong in this case, Drejka far more wrong both for starting the confrontation and for shooting McGlockton without justification.
@Cj Looklin Because the one who parked in the handicapped space is the one who started it. She should have been confronted, and just doing that is not assault.
@Peter Richard-Johnson Yes, he was justified in confronting the woman. There were many empty legal spots for her to park but she decides to park in the handicapped space? No, she should not have pushed him to the ground. The guy on the ground was justified in protecting his life or body from further assault.
@Jenny clark She was still in her vehicle and the engine was running. Legally she couldn't be ticketed or fined. However, notice how Michael parked his car in the middle of the parking lot, which is VERY ILLEGAL, in order to accost this women over her questionable, not illegal, idiling location. If he was so concerned about the law why didn't he take the time to legaly park his vehicle before getting out?
@Peter Richard-Johnson Yes I do understand that, but it had nothing to do with his guilt or innocence in this case. And no, parking in the handicapped space is not better.
@Cj Looklin Your are right about all that, but no matter how stupid the guy was acting, it has no bearing on his guilt or innocence in this case. Once a guy pushes you to the ground and is standing over you, you have a right to protect your life and body.
@Jenny clark that's fine. Of course he had the right to defend himself, you coukd even argue that it was perfectly reasonable for him to pull out his sidearm, BUT he didn't have the right to KILL someone. What sane individual fear for their life after being pushed? I've had drunk man follow me out of a bar and punch me (for talking to his girl) he was much taller than me, did I have the right to kill him?
@Peter Richard-Johnson What makes you think his life or body was not in danger? If I had just been knocked to the ground and someone was standing over me, I would think that more was probably coming, and I don't think he should have to wait until he was jumped and beaten. That's what the gun is for, to prevent him from being beaten or killed. No I am not saying that he was right to illegally park and yell at someone in the handicapped zone. He should have parked legally. But people who park in the handicap should be called out for it. I don't know if you are correct that it is ok if the motor is running. But really none of that is relevant. The only thing that is relevant is that the guy reacted to a verbal confrontation with physical assault and the guy had a right to protect himself from any more.
@Jenny clark maybe, if you look the video again, he was placing his hands on his waist (Thats a very awkward position to kick someone in) it seems more likely that now that the immediate threat to his wif was over, he'd wait to hear what michael had to say, then michael shot him.
@Unknown Chick defending them from what? From being asked to move their car? Anyone who turns a verbal confrontation into a physical one should be taken out of the gene pool same with anyone who defends them.
Protect his family? There was nothing physical until he pushed him! I hate that what i think was possibly good man lost his life but im telling ya if im having a heated conversation and end up on my ass from someone out of sight i would also be very defensive! And the fact that he was retreating after that does not matter and if you think it does youve never been hit or treated unjustly!
@Jenny clark The dude backed up once weapon was drawn. There was no reason to fire. There was at least a solid 3 seconds before he fires AFTER he backs up. There was no reason to fire and no immediate threat. This was murder.
@AustenKY 77'Lt Well it does matter that he was retreating, but in that instant, in that moment of fear, the guy on the ground didn't have time to think about that and was just protecting himself. Yes, it is a tragedy. All involved acted like idiots, and a man with a family lost his life.
@Alec Serrano How do you know there were three seconds? The film was speeded up. Anyway, I think the guy on the ground did not know what he guy was going to do next, so he shot him.
@jane kennedy She was in the vehicle and the engine was on. She was idiling, which isn't illegal. Micheal on the other hand illegaly parked his vehicle in the middle of the parking lot to start shit with a stranger.
@Bobby I am in no way shape or form saying Drejka isn't guilty, but why should anyone be expected to take an ass kicking rather than shoot? The victim in this case was definitely retreating after the gun was displayed. The shooter definitely initiated the conflict from the start and has zero reason to claim self-defense. It's just odd to me that gun owners are expected to take a beating rather than defend themselves with their gun. I'm not entirely sure from your comment, but you seem to be suggesting that you shouldn't be allowed to shoot someone if they are using less than lethal force. Why does anyone owe their attacker a defense only equal to the attack? Guns exist so that we don't have to engage in hand to hand combat.
Andy Tyler think I was misunderstood here. I am a gun owner myself and absolutely stand for mine, yours and everyone’s right to protect themselves and their loved ones with them, however, if once you draw your firearm, and the attacker ceases to attack and surrenders, maybe firing at them isn’t the best idea. Let the courts sort out the assault/battery charges, no reason to take it to the point of ending the surrendering persons life just because you got beaten up, especially in this case for not minding your own damn business. His kids now get to grow up without a father. I don’t think people realize just how valuable the soul is, extinguishing a human life should never be an easy decision imo.
My Boring Adventures I want to start by saying I am not defending Drejkas actions here because he was wrong to of fired on the victim, however, let’s be rational here. Was it necessary for the victim to shove Drejka without engaging him first in conversation? No. Had things of likely not ended so tragically here had be not if shoved him immediately without first speaking to him, probably. I mean, Drejka wasn’t physically attacking the mans family, it was verbal. We use our words, diplomacy in America. Walking out of that store like some tough guy and shoving him to the ground was the wrong move, was it worth his life, no, it wasn’t. However, no, you’re wrong, he had no justification for engaging Drejka in violence, just as Drejka has no justification in using lethal force.
@Bobby I agree. My assumptions with my comment are that a gun owner is being attacked without provocation, and displaying the gun doesn't end the attack. Over and over, however, the fact that an unarmed person is shot is the main focus of high profile police shootings while disregarding every other fact. "Stand your ground" laws always cause controversy. When you said he was only pushed, it reminds me of so many other comments where the gun owner is criticized because he shot someone that was "just going to beat him up." It's truly bizarre logic to me. Even when we have footage of officers being punched, there's still a significant portion of the population that thinks it is wrong to shoot.
Jenny clark sure, by drawing his firearm, forcing the other man to surrender and run, which he did. He however did not have the right to shoot the man, who shoved him, in the back. There’s no honor in that.
@Bobby Let the games begin. lol. Maybe we can see my point illustrated in real time now. I have been called a racist SO many times for expressing the opinion that maybe fighting with armed people is a bad idea. Good luck buddy.
Peter Richard-Johnson not that he deserved to die, but he really should not of shoved Drejka, not that Drejka shouldn’t of minded his own damn business but the victim here did escalated it to violence by putting his hands and shoving him. Unfortunately he met another man who wanted violence, he had not predicted the other man however was armed and ready to kill. Most tragic for the kids who now have to grow up without a father, in my opinion.
@Name Withheld Hey, man if i piss you off and you start swinging, I'll swing right back. But, you can rest assured that It's unlikely that I'd ever pull out my Taurus on you unless you come at me with your boys or pull out your own piece 👌🏿
The point of this original comment above is that he has a history of pulling his gun on unarmed ppl. How many times can you pull a loaded gun on random strangers before someone gets hurt? The only sad thing is that he didn't pull his gun on someone who was also carrying and a better shot. This guy was a do nothing edgelord.
L Vader some random dude screams at your partner with your kids in the car u come out with no context I dont blame him for making space mabey words would have worked mabey not either way he didnt jump on him and start beating the shit out of him like a THUG (whatever that means to you ) the end of the day dude started the whole thing over petty bs and could've a got up left and called the cops if his pride /arm was hurt that bad
Cj Looklin you are probably right. He is a male Karen who should have minded his own business. But the other guy put himself in the situation by assaulting this guy, thus giving this male Karen an excuse. I feel for the kids that had to witness their father’s killing.
If somebody starts shouting and screaming and getting in your face or somebody you care about you may push them back its a natural reaction. Also Michael Drejka could be seen as the aggressor depending on the language he was using. it can take surprisingly little force to knock somebody over instead of just pushing them away. This guy from previous incidences was out to kill someone it was premeditated murder he was purposely doing it. 1 or 2 times maybe but 5 times in a row. His mistake was there was a camera there to prove it.
L Vader stop perpetuating the mentality that black men are “thugs”. The victim saw a random stranger screaming and gesturing at his wife and reacted. Sure, pushing someone isn’t the mature thing to do- but it does NOT warrant being shot, let alone murdered in cold blood. How is Drejka not the thug for shooting at an unarmed man who pushed him once?
@L Vader Totally agree. Both did wrong and its a tragedy, but dont assault people, especially not from behind and you wont get shot...easy as that. And tbh a guy that assaults you from behind, isnt the most honorable, so I wouldnt know what he does next...
His first mistake was talking to the police without a lawyer present he's pretty much talking himself into jail. And number two there's no law that says you have to let somebody beat you up or cause you bodily harm.. and number two if you don't want to get shot don't try to assault a random person at a gas station
@L Vader The guy was protecting his family. I can almost guarantee if the guy was white you wouldn't have used the word "thug" to describe the guy who pushed Drejka. Just the word thug insinuates violence. Noone should be killed for pushing a sensitive and insecure man. Gtfo here. 🤦♂️
@Paul Its the connotation of the word thug. It's been used to negatively portrait men of color for generations. Particularly associating black men as violent criminals. The gentleman was protecting his wife. Alot of people would argue protecting your wife would warrant far greater force than he used against his wife's aggressor. You cant start a confrontation get pushed then claim you were the victim.
He's disabled so how did "dude illegally park"? Was he not in a designated parking spot? Everyone keeps saying that he illegally parked but how so? What's illegal about it & how did he deserve to be knocked to the ground. It didn't look like he was screaming.
The only thing I see in the video that makes me see him as guilty is that the dude that knocked him down retreated on seeing the weapon come out.
@Diego He wasn't protecting his family. His family was in no immediate danger. They were safely inside a motor vehicle. And even if a motor vehicle isn't completely safe, it's still safer than out on the street. She had no reason to exit the vehicle. If you feel unsafe, what logic tells you to get closer to the threat? She was planning to confront Drejka when she could have ignored him, rolled her windows up, and locked her doors. This is not an excuse for Drejka's actions. This is more of a declaration that every party involved with this incident did not act in a sensible or intelligent manner. They all fucked up. Learn how to interact with people before you leave the house.
Who the hell is defending this guy?! The victim stepped back while the gun was pointed at him. That is extremely clear. There was no imminent threat to the suspect of bodily harm. Bullshit.
When the gun was drawn, the victim BACKED UP. WE SEE THIS. that immediately negates any justifiable manslaughter defense. Forget that the victim pushed the suspect. Forget that. The moment the suspect pulled his gun, the victim disengaged. End of altercation. Victim backed up. He got killed NOT because he pushed the suspect. He got killed because the suspect was committed for whatever reason to shoot the man who pushed him. It’s unjustifiable. Plain and simple. The victim would still be alive if the suspect hadn’t fired his gun when the victim backed up. End of.
@Peter Richard-Johnson Instead of shoving him he should shown him the disabled parking permit. They were wrong to park on that spot and not display the permit. RIGHT???? And if they shouldn't have been parked there - then a simple sorry would have sufficed.
@Peter Richard-Johnson clearly you are not interested in defending disabled people right to have a parking spot, and ok if people use it even when there are other options. This is a common problem, and I guess you want the disabled to fight their own corner. But many of them cannot do so, and they do not have to beg for something as simple as that.
legally you may be right. So law over the disabled ... right? sad
I guess you think those of us willing to stand up for the disabled ... its okay to push them to the floor? I don't think so.
Either show the permit.... or say sorry and move out. Don't get violent.
But even a violent guy did not deserved to be killed. And this man was clearly retreating, so the verdict was a good one.
@L Vader I don't blame the victim at all. If we put ourselves in his position, he comes out of the store and some nut is yelling at his loved one. I think most people would've put hands on him just out of instinct to protect. Would a nice calm conversation have been nice? Sure. But this guy seems totally nuts and he's lucky he didn't get more than a shove. If some weirdo was circling my car, I'd feel incredibly threatened.
@Javiani Andino I'm gonna say it. I feel the only reason he got described as a "thug" is because he's black. Even if it was a white man and people still didn't like that he shoved someone, I don't think "thug" would've been used to describe him.
Just tossing in my 2 cents. The push was an assault but the shooting was not self defense either as the boyfriend backed away afterward, clearly disengaging. Yelling is not assault, as some are trying to say, so in no way was the push, especially of that level, warranted and that was a very hard push. Pushes that causes falls have been know to kill people unintentionally, or even cause brain damage, if the person happens to hit his head on the ground or other object.
What the boyfriend did was VERY bad and unjustified. He would have been arrested hands down if he'd lived and no amount horrible behavior on the other man's part will change that. DO NOT THINK ITS OK! DO NOT RAISE YOUR KIDS THINKING ITS OK! YOU WILL HAVE A VERY SAD LIFE FAR FROM YOUR FAMILY WHEN THEY NEED YOU!
0 likes
Frank Guy2020-08-09 03:52:42 (edited 2020-08-09 03:56:59 )
@Paul Your last comment is evidence enough, the (not so) subtle racism is oozing out of it.
Genuinely dude, the amount of people calling you racist in this one corner of the internet should be even more evidence for you. You're just delusional. Or a troll. Either way, I'm looking forward to your next novel.
@Peter Richard-Johnson I agree totally, if some man was screaming at me when I had my kids in the car I would expect my husband to remove the threat. Why did he have a gun if he was just popping into the shop, this guy was also parked illegally and i believe he was itching to shoot someone. He apparently has threatened and pulled a gun before this murder. Some people need a psych evaluation before getting a weapon. Plus wtf is this negative instead of just no, does he think it makes him sound clever? What the hell does the quality of the colour in the CCTV? Why is colour necessary to hav colour
He was pushed by a man that was not running towards him, not tackled by a man charging at him, if a man was screaming at me with my kids in the car I would hope my husband would remove the threat away from me. I think that race may have been hiding beneath the surface. The guy was carrying a gun to pop to the shop ffs who needs a gun to pick up some loo roll and munchies? The colour quality seems not as important as content! The other question is why doesnt Michael take a defensive shot rather than a kill shot?
@Matt Phillips and if the ignorant woman hadn't parked in a handicapped spot it all could have been avoided, or had she moved when it was pointed out, or if the dead guy hadn't shoved him... i mean there were a lot of points where something and should have been done differently.
Matthew Meyer ...I'll assume you are saying this about the gunman also. That anyone who escalates words to the physical should be removed from the gene pool? Don't forget he has pulled a gun on multiple unarmed ppl before this incident. Those are only the ones that we know about, which got reported to police. I'd say that's an insane variety of escalation every time you find yourself feeling uncomfortable about something. I doubt this happens more than once to most ppl, if at all. Clearly, this guy feels threatening excessive force is the answer in pretty much any situation.
👏👏👏👏 On point. The only thing I don’t agree with is that he shot him in a panic. It seemed to me he aimed, paused for a second or two and then shot. Had he shot as he was swinging the firearm I might agree. But it seemed like the gun was visible to everyone and that is why the victim turned to run. The shooter should have registered his retreat as he was seated and stationary, looking directly at the victim. It’s almost as if he was insulted by the retreat and thought, “ Oh no you don’t!” Your synopsis of the facts I feel are quite accurate. Thanks for the additional info also. It really does flesh out the details of what I feel was a racially motivated attack.
If you are saying that words met with violence is an unnecessary escalation, you’ll also have to acknowledge that murder is an unnecessary escalation of physical violence.
Actually Jenny, only a ‘thug’ repeatedly pulls guns on unarmed women and children. It was only a matter of time before Drejka’s gun killed someone the way he was constantly threatening ppl with it. I don’t have a dog in this fight, these are facts. If you refuse to acknowledge that Drejka had a history of manufacturing circumstances that justified his control of other ppl with a sidearm... you are CHOOSING willful ignorance.
Just pointing out that if you flip your own script the same can be said for Drejka. He is not a cop. He should not have verbally attacked a stranger and most importantly, should have minded his own business, as you suggest. ....and none of this would have happened. Please don’t disagree and make Canadians looks stupid.
You’re assuming to know what would have happened if..
But the fact is, pulling a gun on unarmed ppl is a hobby of Mr.Drejka. We can’t assume that time and again everyone would walk away unharmed when a gun is pulled at every provocation. When someone is this careless and gun happy ... ppl will be hurt. This was not a one-off incident. This man had serious issues.
Gun ownership 101: Don't pull a gun unless you plan on using it, this man had priors of pulling that gun, that day he finally used it. He put himself in a situation where it was a possibility to be able to use it, all he needed was an excuse. Most gun owners will never be in that situation, it's a safeguard, not a reason to start a confrontation.
Deana Cagle but that’s not what happened. Did you watch the video? Honest question. After the weapon was pulled Marquis stands still for a second and then backs up two steps starting to turn away from McGlockton. He was not hovering over him, he was not charging towards him, he was retreating.
Jenny clark so you admit Marquis was backing up and unlikely to engage in a physical confrontation because he saw the gun but...because he might have beat McGlockton up if he didn’t have a gun it’s ok he got shot and died?
@L Vader act like a thug or stand up for his women and children? He parked illegally to see if someone was parked illegally to pace around her car and yell at her about being parked illegally... wtf do you expect. Just for him to walk down n scream at people and not get what he deserves.. a shove? He can scream at a women but the second he gets into a physical altercation he can't duke it out like a real man. Some people can't take a L. But at the end of the day someone died because someone didnt mind their business and children wont have a father to grow up with and a women with no man.
This dude was waiting to use that firearm. He was chomping at the bit. He used tactical type words when talking to the cops, like it was just three public servants having a conversation. If he wasn't in the military, he wanted to be. If he was never a cop, he wanted to be. He wants to be an authority figure for all the wrong reasons.
L Vader no he acted like someone protecting their family, Michael acted like a thug, it’s already been spelled out for you. How about your step out of that racist viewpoint you have and start viewing situations for what they are
L Vader I know with 100% certainty if the skin colors were switched, your comment would have read “maybe if Michael wasn’t acting like a thug pulling up on that lady none of this would have happened.” “Marques was clearly just trying to defend his family from a thug.”
L Vader you wanna know how this actually wouldn’t have happened? This wouldn’t have happened if Michael wasn’t putting himself in situations where he thought he could get away with shooting someone.
Deana Cagle he wasn’t hovering over him, he took three steps back and began to turn around. That’s why he was shot in his side. Did you not see the video? You can only shoot someone if your life is in immediate threat, an unarmed man backing away from you is not a threat especially when you have the gun. Why am I explaining this? Is this a difficult concept?
Jenny clark Maybe, but that’s why you have a gun. He successfully used it to nullify the threat. But when the threat was over he fired anyway. When you shoot someone who is not a threat to you its just murder. You see that don’t you? Or are just trolling us?
Jenny clark actually he did, you can see in the video of him training his firearm at him as he was backing away. Which means one he knew he was backing away.
Matthew Meyer okay so when you see a creep yelling and screaming at your girlfriend/wife and kids you’d run away? Nah, I think you’d probably man up and confront the guy. A real man protects his family, a coward shoots a man in the back.
Andy Tyler use of firearms is to nullify immediate threats. If you fire at an unarmed person who is not a threat to you it’s murder, you understand that right? The proper course of action was to call the cops after he was pushed not to play judge, jury, and executioner.
0 likes
Michael Manalang2020-08-10 06:58:10 (edited 2020-08-10 07:47:05 )
Andy Tyler except he wasn’t attacked without provocation. He was yelling and screaming at a woman with children a confrontation which he started. He carries a gun and starts fights, why do you think he does this? The man was protecting his family, the coward shot him in the back.
Jacques Malan I’m sorry brother, when see a creep screaming and yelling at my wife with children pushing him away is not assault especially when he started the confrontation.
UberAV first he was not at the designated parking spot and second witnesses went in the store to tell the owner that the guy was back harassing people. This was his fifth time initiating confrontation with people and twice he pulled his gun out on two unarmed women.
MSA if that was the story, but witnesses told a different story. Drejka was yelling at the woman with her children, the victim did not know what’s going on. He saw a man verbally assaulting his girlfriend with his children so he shoved him away. Maybe too hard but instead on pressing charges to the police he shot him.
Onba I think if you see a creepy man yelling at your wife and kids you would push him away too. The creep started the confrontation, you cannot say that he is also the victim.
johnmann not a random dude but a man yelling at his girlfriend with his children who started the confrontation. He was defending his family and only cowards shoot unarmed people in the back.
Johny Blitz it wasn’t a discussion, witnesses reported yelling and screaming from Drejka. Also, this was not the first time he’s done this. He carries a firearm and starts confrontation with people, why do you think he does that?
Jenny clark except he wasn’t hovering over him, he was backing up when he pulled the gun. Also, he carries a gun and starts fights (this is the 5th time he’s done this) why do you think he does this?
@Conservative Copwatch We have different definitions of "cleary". In the video, after pushing Michael to the ground, Markies takes one step further and puts his hands on his hips. How is that "Clearly" a sign of further violence?
I wonder if all of the people in this comment thread saying he was acting like a thug would be saying that if this was an incident that happened between two white guys. My guess is probably not. He was backing away before he was shot, there's no justification for that.
@Bobby I agree with you but lets be clear that being pushed to the ground 'can' be lethal. You only have to smash your head if you have poor mobility or balance, or other medical issues. But quite clearly the guy with the gun was looking for an opportunity to kill someone. He was probably bullied a lot as a child and was looking for some twisted revenge. Look what happened to that Buffalo man who was 75 - pushed by Police. I know he survived but it was very serious.
Cj Looklin I completely agree with you. This guy was looking for trouble. Anyone gives me shit or gets heavy with me, I'm going to blow them away. He is going out looking for that situation.
@Cj Looklin I don't know what got said in that parking lot. Both men in my opinion used excessive force. The shooting victim should not have pushed the other man to the ground in the first place. But the other guy should not have shot him. I think it was unnecessary, I think he was acting on temper rather than fearing for his life. Watch the police interview and the prosecution and defense arguments in court aswell as this video. Who takes a hand gun with them to the store and purposely looks for a argument? Knowing full well that things will get heated and no one will back down. Also I think this guy has a history of doing this sort of thing. A car parking space? That didn't effect him in anyway. It's not like he saw some people beating a old person up or vandalizing something. He was looking for confrontation.
@L Vader "well, he was assaulted first" not justification for homicide. getting pushed down to the ground is different then being grounded and pounded.
People saying that it's alright to attack someone over words, how many times have you beat up your family members then? Or workmates? Everyone acts like they are a tough guy, but try this in person, then let us know how it works out. Nothing good will come of it.
**This guys step dad was in the military for 20 years. **He was in ROTC all four years of high school. **He sets his clock in military time and uses words like “copy that” or “roger that”. **After 17 attempts he finally passed the ASVAB and joined the military. **He made it a month into bootcamp before getting discharged for failure to adapt, blames it in a back injury and calls himself a veteran.
Comes home, tries to get a job as a police officer or security guard. Isn’t hired anywhere. Decides he’s just a retired veteran that protects his neighborhood
It's negligent of anyone carrying a firearm to be a vigilante or hell, just get into any negative interaction. It's having an ace up your sleeve, except when it's revealed the other party dies. It's a fucked up loophole I'm sure thousands have been murdered under in the name of 'self-defense'
+Valencia Williams Sorry I'm a bit confused. Are those facts you've learned about his life, or are you speculating? Because 'Those are the vibes I'm getting.' Could be read two ways as 'here are some facts, and he naturally gives off those vibes' or 'This guy gives off vibes like someone who has had this sort of theoretical chequered history.'
@BODHI lol this is self defense. dont attack people if you dont wanna get shot the concept is simple. drejka got manslaughter if the guy didnt push him drejka wouldve got murder and something crazy
Lol. I'm retired navy, in Hawaii I was moving into my apartment after deployment just ending. I remember nothing, I was put in a coma by getting assaulted and my right arm is paralyzed and hand doesn't work. Getting assaulted, even though he instigated you never know what can happen. He only shot once, and again I think taking aim without shooting of stopped it. If he still approached then go head. But he discharged kind of early.
@BODHI God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)
I get the vibe that he called somebody out for parking in a spot they shouldn't have been and then a bully came over and blind sided him. More than one person was in the wrong that day.
@Brandy Harding he could call the freakin cops if he's sooooo worried about illegal parking (while parking illegally himself), instead of taking it upon himself to be some kind of aggro vigilante. He was accosting the woman, and the victim was defending his wife.
@Brandy Harding No one rejects that. You just can't put a corpse on trial. If Drejka hadn't shot him, then Drejka would have been free and McGlockton would have been on trial for assault. That doesn't absolve Drejka of killing a man who was obviously trying to retreat. Any firearm owner should be aware of this simple rule.
Don't knock 24 hour time. It is an immensely useful system for communicating time. The /entire/ federal government uses it. The computer science world lives by it, as well. Copy that and roger that are just fun to say.
Having said that, everything else you said I agree with the implicit accusation that he was in the midst of some law enforcement or military fantasy.
i passed an ASVAB practice test a recruiter sent me and i spent about 5 seconds on each problem. skipped over the engine parts and scored so high he wouldn’t stop calling me for almost a year. Shits RIDICULOUSLY easy.
didn’t end up joining cuz it was always a last resort option, and i got a job that pays well and offers free college like a month after i spoke to the recruiter. Also found out it’s an 8 year contract not a 4 year and that shook me a bit to how serious the commitment was gunna be. I’m fine with signing 4/5 years of my life away to serve but almost a decade? nah that ain’t for me.
@Shimrra and if the Drejka didn’t have a gun he would of been head stomped, not saying he had to shot but the aggressor didn’t back down from his assault until seeing the gun.
@Clown World Resident "and if the Drejka didn’t have a gun he would of been head stomped" Possibly not probably.
"not saying he had to shot but the aggressor didn’t back down from his assault until seeing the gun." It can certainly be argued that he shoved the guy and then did not press the attack further before he saw the gun. He was just holding his ground until he saw the gun, at which point he began to retreat. Yes, Drejka could have pulled the weapon and used the threat of it to escape. However, he still was the aggressor of the whole situation and /any/ use of a gun, at that point, is going to end up with a brandishing charge.
Drejka was a fool for getting into an argument. Any sane concealed carrier knows to /never/ instigate an altercation. Once you instigate, you lose much of your rights to self-defense claims.
*Thug’s Dad left him before birth. His step dad was in prison for 20 years. **He stole wallets and dropped out of high school. **He has a fake bling watch and doesn’t know what military time is. **After 17 attempts, he finally won $5 on a scrather ticket. *^He made it a month in middle school before getting kicked out for stealing wallets. **He was on “disability” for “anxiety” like his entire family.
@L.Q's Black Life Matters unfortunately you cant steal or park in a handicap spot then cry racism if someone of a different race "accosts" you for doing something illegal. as far as racists are concerned, black lives matter is a black supremacist organization who hypocritically believe the KKK is immoral for doing the exact same things they do, several nba players have used the term whiteboy, and beyonce released a movie called black is king (referring to black race) all in 2020. that said racism is freedom of speech/freedom of beliefs. if you want to hate on a race, gender, religion, disability, etc you can as long as you dont attack them, rob them, etc. unfortunately you can accost whoever you want for whatever reasno you want, especially if theyre doing something illegal
@dead yami imagine being offended at all lives matter but saying "black is king" or black lives matter is somehow okay this is laughable we live in a messed up world it seems where people will literally say a white man insulting, robbing ir killing a black man is evil and racist but a black man doing the same things to a white man is somehow not wrong
Lmao @ some of these responses. I was a recruiter for 4 years and yes you can technically fail the asvab. 35 and above is typically passing and anything above 50 is considered upper mental group.
@matthew radabaugh dude I recruited for the navy for 5 years. You take the test, and if you don’t get a certain score you cannot join. So, while it is still a “placement test” you aren’t joining if you don’t make that score. You know…like a pass or fail…
I didn’t even realize how much this guy was in the wrong until i noticed how many steps the victim took to get away from him. like he was trying to get away and he still got shot. may his soul rest easy tho
@Micheal Linne bro having a gun or being disabled doesn't give him a right to start some shit and then shoot when the shit escalates. If you start it and it escalates to the point you gotta shoot you are 100% at fault
at 2:29 the gun is pulled and you see the victim start to step backwards and away, at 2:31 the shot is fired. Only a few seconds but you can see that the victim was clearly trying to retreat from the situation before he was shot. There was no present threat when the gun was fired.
@Enter the Abyss that's where you're wrong. Confronting someone isn't illegal and even if he had been provoking violence by saying racial expletives it still would have been self defense so long as he didn't start that altercation with violence or a serious and inherently dangerous crime. The violence started when that man pushed a disabled man off his feet essentially for confronting his wife about a crime they were committing and it wasn't just none of this man's business because it was a crime that directly effected him as he was disabled and when people so nonchalantly park illegally in those disabled parking spaces they are taking those spaces from people who need them.
I never once said having a gun gives you the right to shoot nor did I say being disabled did. What I did say was it's not like this guy had his back to this man, he had one foot towards him and was facing towards him, there was no way to know in my opinion if that guy was going to try to continue beating this disabled man or actually turn away and run until after he'd already been shot but when your attacker is that close it's easy to see why you'd be in a mindset of I either shoot or I risk this continuing and getting beaten to death.
@Micheal Linne Dude gets pushed over, pulls a gun, doesn't take enough time to assess the situation, (didn't even look at the guys hands or face,) kills someone who was moving away.
@Micheal Linne you are arguing eith idiots. They seem to be so confident in a broken “justice system”. Clearly they dont realize you in fact guilty til proven innocent
@Lewis McCombe you don't have that time to take. He was facing him and did take a step forward in that video in my opinion. It doesn't matter if someone took 2 steps back right before, that happens in fights all the time but as soon as he took that leading step forward and was facing him that was enough to honestly believe he was in a fighting position and was going to beat that disabled man right there.
People talk about the 21 foot rule and mention it's meant for knife wielders but that man was considerably closer, was essentially within 5 feet and within plenty of range to lunge and kick that man and start a struggle over the gun which could have easily ended in the disabled man's death. You can't wait for the lunge, as soon as that man took that step forward, even if he took 2 steps back first, he was a threat and that's exactly when he was shot and that disabled man had just barely got his bearings and hold on the gun not giving him enough time to have even seen that man take 2 steps back.
@Micheal Linne all I can say is watch the video .. it completely lays your argument to rest. And for the record.. this “disabled” man is not visibly disabled so no one would know that unless he told them
@Micheal Linne at the beginning of the Interrogation the detective asks if the handicap spot being occupied effects the suspect and he says “if my mother in law pulled into the parking lot then yes” and he never said anything about being disabled so I dont know where you got that from? Clearly the family shouldnt have parked in the handicap spot but the man did not need to harass the woman in the car about it. He initiated an argument when he could have just made a report to the police instead.
@Jude L I'm not sure he initiated it. I don't know if you can tell but I definitely couldn't tell when that window came down so who talked to who first is up in the air in my opinion. The only thing we know is that his testimony that she rolled down her window and talked to him first was contested in court and I actually think this video takes a biased view in that woman's favor because even though it wasn't something that was established the narrator spoke as though it was established he had spoken to her first. It could have very easily ended with him taking pictures of the license plate and the handicap parking spot in my opinion especially if she was the one to call out to him and not the other way around but also even if he had talked to her first, it's no more inherently dangerous than seeing someone shoplifting and calling them out on it. Being shoved to the ground from behind definitely wasn't foreseeable especially since it didn't even look like a heated argument or anything. I still think it should be self defense
@Micheal Linne In the video, you can see before he walks toward the driver window he stands in front of the car and seems to be gesturing and speaking. Its true, you cant be 100% sure who was the first to speak to the other but its easy to conclude that the man initiated the argument by parking (illegally, also) and walking around the womans car. The victum shouldn’t have started a physical fight but the suspect didn’t have to use excessive force. Its obvious that once the suspect pulled out the gun the victum immediately backed away, but the suspect still shot him. The suspect also did not state that he felt his life was in danger, he just thought he was going to be beaten and shot the man to “save his own ass” as he puts it. The suspect didnt shot in fear for his life, therefore it is not self defense.
@Jude L what he stated is a verbal threat against his life was never made. He never once said he felt secure that his life was not in danger, he said he was saving his ass and he thought he was facing getting kicked and beaten which kicking someone is deadly force btw, it is very easy to kill someone from kicking them.
@Finite Automata that is only from our perspective with the camera and still he was facing the man and stepped with his leg towards him in the video. And there's no way someone could have seen from the ground like that the direction his foot was facing so there's no way he could have known if it was turning to get away or turning to fight him. The camera gives you a privileged and biased view that he simply didn't have. That could have easily been seen as a step towards him and I think a lot of people would have made the same exact conclusion in fear for their life after being ambushed like that. This man probably isn't thinking at that moment that the guy that violently attacked him out of nowhere is going to run away especially if he moved his leg and hips in that man's direction like that.
@Micheal Linne thats true, but the surveillance footage clearly shows that the victim had no intention of further harming the suspect. He took three steps back as soon as the suspect reached for the gun and was turning to leave when the suspect shot. I don’t see how anyone could believe their life was in danger from a person who is turning to walk away from them. The suspect says that from the time he took out his gun and shot it was a split second, but there is at least a 2.5 second interval where the suspect has his gun trained on the victim before he shoots. During this tome, the victum is actively retreating. You could argue all day long that the suspect was so distraught that he couldn’t think straight enough to see that the victim was backing away, but he obviously was able to think straight enough to pull out his gun, aim, and kill this man.
@Finite Automata and you make that determination from a privileged point of view. Its skewed from being both after the fact and a much better point of view. People who hesitate die and from that man's point of view he did step towards him. You assume that man could somehow know that leg going towards him while his torso and head remained completely pointed towards him was just rotating so he could turn around but there is no way he could have known that especially when laying on the ground on his side aiming up over his back and unable to see his feet.
If you think that if someone who just shoved you to the ground from behind who as far as you can see is stepping in to attack you may not be attacking you and you should take the extra second to make sure than you are already being kicked and grappled and you are already fighting over your gun. If there is any sign they are coming in to attack you, you do not hesitate. It is you or them until you know otherwise and not the otherway around unless you would willingly die just to be sure you don't accidentally kill someone who attacked you and may or may not be trying to continue their assault.
Bro he literally slammed him into the ground the black guy was like a foot taller than him and had 60 pounds on him, he felt that his life was threatened so he shot. I guarantee that the black guy would have beat him further on the ground
@Jude L he didn't have his gun out for 2.5s. It took 2.5s from the time he reached for his gun until he fired it. 95% of that time was getting the gun out and aiming in his general direction
@Sean O except he wasn't really yelling at a woman and her child, her kid was inside the store first of all and we're given no indication of shouting whatsoever. Again we disagree, that doesn't make you right, you're still not considering that his point of view is way worse than ours. I think from his point of view it would have looked like he was coming in to attack again
@Finite Automata there is no such thing as shooting to disable or disarm. When you have to shoot someone you shoot to kill or you fail to hit them. You don't have the right to defend yourself in other countries, also, this has nothing to do with stand your ground laws, which remove the duty to retreat, because if you cannot get away you don't have a duty to retreat in the first place and he was on the ground aiming up at his attacker. Again you say he was retreating but you have a privileged point of view and self defense must only be seen as necessary from their point of view not the bystanders. If he could reasonably think that he was about to be attacked from his point of view, and he could, it would've looked like a step towards him from his point of view, then it should be self defense. The reason he was convicted is because people think he had enough time and a big enough field of view to determine his attacker was backing away but what they don't consider is that their point of view isn't his point view and that the 2.5s it took to draw the gun and shoot was 2 seconds of pulling it, half a second of aiming and seeing this man step towards him and a single moment of pulling the trigger.
@Finite Automata also that "step to the side" was behind this guys back that he had to aim over and getting behind an armed person is exactly how someone who is about to rush you and wrestle your gun out of your hands to shoot you will choose to approach you.
@Finite Automata And in "no other country" will you get shoved into the ground for telling someone to move away from a handicap spot either. Regardless of the verbal confrontation the man was having with the woman, shoving him into the ground for no other apparant reason than that is clearly very wrong
Lol you must be misinformed. It was clear he was wrong from the gate. ONCE SOMEONE STOPS BEING A THREAT YOU CAN NOT SHOT THEM!!!! Then claim self defense.
@Micheal Linne it seemed to me that it was 50/50 until the end where you find out he threatened people with his gun regularly. He was someone looking to use that gun.
@Finite Automata killing somebody is life altering, and probably the most stressful thing imaginable, or one of. To me the average person, would want to avoid that senrio at all cost. I aslo wouldn't seek confrantations with people knowing I'm strapped, . I'd avoid that too.
@Finite Automata they probably give sympathy for school shooters, as long as they've been bullied. Because clearly assault (without a threat to your life) is clearly an excuse to kill someone/s
@Enter the Abyss He didnt say he wasnt at fault, he said the guy that got shot was also in the wrong, which he 100% was. he ASSAULTED a DISABLED PERSON
@Micheal Linne did you watch the video? The victim had three children. Oh, wait you're just here to be offended for, and defending someone being charged with manslaughter
@Vilesentry and you had to make it about race even though literally no one else suggested it was racially motivated. That says more about you than this man
@Vilesentry we disagree, get over it. I think it was reasonable self defense, you think it was cold-blooded and calculated. At worst he made a mistake in my opinion.
@Micheal Linne “you’re offended by mine” you’re shocked people aren’t peachy with you defending a murderer who instigated a confrontation, harassing a mother with children and then unlawfully abusing his legal weapon? the law isn’t even on your side.
yeah. if he hadn't moved back, or actually took a step while the gun was out it would be different. But the step towards him was just before drawing the weapon - which in Michaels mind must have happened at the same time as he confused trying to take his gun out. So if he was looking for oppurtunity to use his gun, or maybe wasn't as steady in a stressful situation as a gun owner really should be - I cannot judge. But he should not have shot him - the drawing seemed enough, otherwise a warning shot seems to have been quite enough even if Michael was extremely startled, confused and stressed in the situation. Just imho.
@Micheal Linne We have no confirmation of the disabilities of the child or the disabilities of the wife and/or husband who was shot dead. I don't believe that it's fair to assume that they are physically threatening considering that the guy was shoved for being pissy about a parking-space when we don't know anything about the others.
@brit instigated how? By confronting someone, who talked to him first btw, for being a deuchebag and parking in a handicap zone?
He wasn't yelling at them, he wasn't kicking the car or threatening them or calling them names, he was blindsided from behind, thrown to the ground and as he's pulling his gun out his attacker is stepping behind him and what easily appears to be in his direction and keeping his torso faced towards him and he shoots the guy that easily appears to be stepping towards him especially if you consider he was on the ground at this point, has to aim over his back as he's on his side and can only see the legs and upwards of this man that just attacked him. I think if you saw this from this man's point of view it would have looked like a step towards him to you. We can't help that he couldn't see from a good angle and couldn't see this man's feet.
@End My Suffering Please except they didn't have placards and as far as we know he was just going to report them to the police until he was attacked. People illegally parking in disabled parking is despicable and should be reported every time.
@Micheal Linne the victim walked away . There is no way to see someone walking away from you as walking towards you, it is literally the opposite direction. The shooter isn’t disabled, your arguments are flawed and bias. You appear to be grasping at straws.
@Hooyahfish it didn't, it entered from the front left side of this guy's abdomen, it was more front than side and again he put a leg towards him, that's the angle that you expect in that situation.
Wow, At first I was on the fence but you made me go back and oh my god, he was totally backing away after he pulled the gun. There were at least a couple seconds of little danger and he still shot him. What a worthless human being.
@Enter the Abyss As much as I believe he was in the wrong, I strongly disagree with your statement "If you start it and it escalates to the point you gotta shoot you are 100% at fault"
If I were to, hypothetically, complain to my neighbor about his mulberry tree making a mess on my lawn and he escalated the situation to potentially fatal violence, I would absolutely not be at fault to respond in turn.
@Micheal Linne Confronting maybe not. Verbally abusing however. Fighting words often kills any self-defense claim because that IS in fact starting the incident.
@Finite Automata you mean the country that less than half the population controls and has controlled consistently for the last 50 years and has somehow been able to blame their mistakes on the rest of us like they weren't the ones pushing the bills that have financially ruined this country and also pushed mass incarceration? The country where when one side cheats it never gets investigated because they control both the media and all the major government bodies like the fbi, Cia, and homeland security? Guess what? I'm not on that side and I'm definitely not happy about it. The rest of us believe in individual freedom so we can free ourselves of tyranny if we need to. The biggest reason the other side is able to control us so much is because they don't believe individual freedom is important nor do they believe tyranny is a bad thing. They believe they need to babysit and force their viewpoints on everybody else to get their perfect society and they try their best to accomplish it.
@sean ajolo I thought so at first but now its unclear. He said something about what if his step mom was there according to someone else. But even if he wasn't disabled, calling someone out on doing something as deuchy as parking in a disabled parking space doesn't warrant a violent ambush and the question of self defense comes after.
Wow you sure do enjoy running your mouth. Problem is, you don’t understand what “imminent threat” means. It is not some subjective thing that yo get to decide on, it’s a threat that must be real, not simply perceived, and would occur in an immediate time frame, and the most important part, “could result in death or serious bodily harm.” This legal definition is quite narrow, and all criteria must be met, not just one or two. People like you keep spreading this false narrative that if you catch a burglar in your home you have the right to shoot them. You confuse duty to retreat with criteria to imminent threat. If the burglar surrenders and is no longer an imminent threat, you can’t shoot them unless they do something to again become an imminent threat. And I really don’t know why you’re on here arguing with every single person. Doesn’t make me very confident that you understand law very well.
@Micheal Linne So like, I'm not going to come into this trying to actually argue against your points, because you've made your stubbornness concerning where you stand on the matter extremely clear.
But just fucking imagine actually defending someone who shot an unarmed person. It doesn't fucking matter who started it, it doesn't fucking matter if the person who shoved him down was going to start beating him up, you don't just pull a glock on someone and open fire. You're literally escalating the confrontation for no reason.
I will say that the person who shoved him shouldn't have done so. That was wrong. But the fact that his response in any capacity is to just pull out a gun and shoot a bullet into the victim is just wrong on so many levels. I hope he had his license to carry revoked(if he even had one in the first place) and his firearm(s) confiscated.
I just find the fact that you're actually defending this guy sickening.
@Micheal Linne the killer was NOT disabled . Any "self defense is required to be reasonable and proportionate.. frankly the killer started it from starting a shouting match with his victim's wife.
@NeoSaurfang at this point the wife had just got out the car, , the husband saw a fat stranger harassing his wife, , ➡️ in most places the guy would have been pushed away from any man's wife.
@Micheal Linne no, I also carry my FMK 9mm on me always everywhere and when you carry, you do not start a conflict, confrontation, arguments ect. He should have just went in and told the store manager and let them handle it from there. When you carry a gun you must know where the very very thin line between self defense and murder is, and you can see it in the video. When the victim took two steps back and not forward, he was showing he no longer was a deadly threat, now should he had pushed him NO, but all this could have been avoided, if the shooter did believe he had the right to confront the woman and escalated the situation.
@ментыdestroyer Pulling the gun isn't the problem. And if he had shot while the guy was still coming forward, I doubt he would have been convicted. But he didn't. He waited until the guy was backing away and then shot him. That isn't self defense, by definition.
Did you catch the part where Drejka had, in the past, threatened other drivers during road rage incidents with his gun (including a woman with kids in her car)? Wonder how he justified that to himself. Other people in this thread can make all the unfounded excuses for him that they want, but your comment shows that you see the picture clearly.
He was standing over him being a thug when he shot him. Then ran away after he'd been shot. He wouldn't have run off otherwise, he would have stayed there to stomp him out.
@Micheal Linne Na it was clear from the footage there was plenty of time between when the man was pushed to where he was shot and he was clearly standing or retreating. Not following up and attacking
yea he was physically in the wrong but its hard to know what he was actually thinking. Its possible he just wasnt thinking right since he had just hit the ground.
@Micheal Linne you make a lot of assumptions. I'm not offended, I'm arguing for justice. I don't believe this was racially motivated, although the confrontation with the mother, before the shooting, was instigated by him as he was the individual whom came up to another individuals vehicle and proceeded to circle it and then wait around until noticed and asked why he was there.
@Iridium Apple Absolutely. Just say "what's the problem bro?" Hot head 1 turned it into a fight, and hot head 2 murdered him. Don't be a hot head kids.
@Micheal Linne while I see your point that he shouldn’t have shoved a disabled man 1) why confront the victim’s wife with aggression 2) if you saw some guy screaming at your wife, you’d be pissed so rationality and patience goes out the window 3) why in the FUCK did this man have a firearm on him, he didn’t get it from his car, he had it in his person for whatever reason (I don’t give a fuck if “it’s his right to own a gun”, why would you go outside with a fucking firearm just use a taser or pepper-spray) 4) this man made the victim’s son see his father’s life fade away, in front of him
I dont care how you pin it, Michael was in the wrong for killing the victim and hopefully he thinks twice or thrice before opening fire because he couldnt handle a shove after yelling at another man’s woman
@Micheal Linne so you don’t think pointing your gun and giving him a warning would have been enough to stop the other guy from attacking? Did he really have to kill him dead? Just cause he’s disabled? I agree that you shouldn’t shove someone just like that but it does not justify murder. Y’all not living in the Wild West anymore, it’s the 21st century! But then again, I’m just a European who doesn’t get this whole gun fetish...
@Micheal Linne oh and parking in a disabled spot is not a crime, it’s a violation at best. You’re trying to justify cold blooded murder and it’s making me worried for the community you live in, if you think that’s an okay way to handle confrontation.
@Micheal Linne Also, you say it’s “disgusting” to park illegally in a disabled spot when you’re not disabled but seem to have no problem with the illegal parking of the guy who then went on to harass a woman with her children. I’m sure it has nothing to do with the skin colour that you still think the white guy is in the right for killing a man and traumatising a whole family - just cause someone parked wrong and then someone was shoved cause they’re provoking a confrontation that could’ve been handled in a peaceful manner. You’re also not wondering why this guy walked up to a black woman and her kids with a gun on him. Yep, you’re totally not racist. 😂
@Micheal Linne It wasn't just "confronting" tho. Witnesses in the building referred to it as a loud argument, which generally translates to a screaming match. It doesn't matter if someone is taking the disabled spot. It's not on you as a citizen to confront someone over it, especially a woman who looks to be by herself in the car with a child there, and especially not screaming at her. Her boyfriend was honestly completely justified in pushing the guy over and away from his girlfriend, as he obviously posed a threat to her. You don't just pull a gun on someone because you got pushed for being an asshole, and you especially don't fucking shoot it at someone when they're obviously backing away because you have a fucking gun pulled on them.
@Micheal Linne Fair point about him pushing the guy, that seemed pretty unnecessary. But once he had a gun trained on him and was taking several steps back he stopped being a serious threat. I don't really see a justified killing here, but it could've looked different from his perspective.
@Micheal Linne You are changing your own arguments. In the beginning u said "we can't be sure who spoke" And then u said "by confronting someone, who talked first by the way!" Also, that "douchebag" has 3 kids The suspect is not disabled And his behavior from the very beginning is aggressive.
@Micheal Linne if u r not trained enough to not just randomly shoot someone the moment u panic, then u shouldn't have a gun in the first place. So by now we got 1. Not disabled 2. Aggressive 3. Parked in illegal spot himself 4. Shouldn't have a gun 5. Shot a guy who was clearly stepping away, the only reason he was unsure for a split second was bc his wife was still near the psycho. He took 3 steps back, then stumbled for a split second, which u can tell it's bc his wife and kids r near the car dammit. 6. The suspect was there long enough to know ab kids
@Jon Osterman Most people that see a burglar in their home won't give them a chance to surrender. I can't say that "imminent threat" is subjective but at the same time, an imminent threat may be different to everyone. Look at Kyle Rittenhouse, a case where a lot of people believe he murdered 2 people just because the media created a narrative when in reality it was the most textbook case of self defense, possibly in the history of self defense.
@Jon Osterman well in the us we have what's called a castle doctrine which means we don't have a duty to retreat in our own homes. Also this man couldn't retreat because he was laying on the ground and the imminent threat was his attacker stepping towards and behind him. Perhaps I know how that law works better than you because it actually isn't about objective levels of danger it's about subjective levels of danger. If someone is running towards you and looking at you angrily and focused and reaching for something for example, you don't have to take into consideration whatever they might be reaching for because you may not see it until it's too late. That's a deadly threat even without the context of being violently thrown to the ground first. That person could be handing you a summons, but so long as the item they're reaching for is unclear, you have any reason to believe your life might be in danger, and they are targeting you, shooting them would be self defense if you couldn't retreat. Say you were a paraplegic sitting on a park bench with your wheelchair too far out of reach for you to grab it and get away for example.
Well this guy's attacker took a step towards him from his point of view, its the same principle as reaching for something, it doesn't matter what they are stepping towards you for or reaching for so long as you have a reasonable belief the purpose is to assault and seriously harm you, like you know, right after having thrown you to the ground and potentially killing you.
@Angela Halliwell except he didn't start a shouting match, it's debatable wether he even spoke first and also he was going to just take pictures and report them until he got into that argument and was violently ambushed
A lot of debate going on here. My biggest take away is you get assholes who create problems and get into confrontational predicaments regularly. When you disrespect someone's partner, a lot of the time, you will get a rise.
I know people are saying he didn't have the right to push him, legally, but in a lot of cases that's what will happen in a situation like this. And confrontations like this happen everywhere, all across the world and all of the time.
However, in most other countries, you don't have a significant portion of society carrying a firearm.
@Oklahoma southerner except he made a third step towards and behind him after those 2 steps back and it was only then that he was shot. The biggest reason he lost his trial was because he was too stupid to ask for a lawyer before trying his best to convince the cops it was necessary when the cops will only ever use what you say against you in court even if you fabricate parts in order to make yourself appear better and the truth would have happened to give you a better defense. He stated he was watching his feet because that's what training taught him he was supposed to do, but he was aiming over his back, there was no way he could have seen the guys feet but what he could see was leg moving towards him, upper torso pointed towards him. It would have been better for his defense if he told the truth instead of trying to convince the cop that through virtue of his training it could only have been self defense because his training might suggest he knew how to identify a threat and what he saw specifically constituted that threat but then he added in details he couldn't have seen like the man's feet.
@bornstandin he's in prison because he both lied to to make him appear in better standing to the police, and talked to the police in general without council there to advise him not to make false, exaggerated or reductive statements or to just not say certain things in general.
@Mimi Adams so that's what the other guy was talking about. Apparently I missed that. If that's true then it definitely speaks about this man's general inability to make sound decisions about gun safety. At the same time though people act like seeing a holstered gun is threatening people with that gun so I could see someone reporting falsely that he waved it around just because of road rage if he just had it on him at the time. Had they provided a picture or video of this behavior?
@Bruokoli one kick to the head and he would have died. Or if he just hit his head when he fell. He was going to continue the beating until he had drawn the gun, if he hadn't he'd very likely have been the one in a coffin. The matter of self defense comes after though and it hangs entirely on wether you believe that from the shooters perspective it would be reasonable to believe he was stepping forward to continue the beating and from the shooter's perspective I do believe that's the case as he was aiming over his back and could only watch the man's leg and torso which were both towards him as the leg moved towards him
@Chris Marklowitz he stepped in and behind him on the 3rd step and hadn't been shot until that moment. Our point of view was privileged and we have to consider that this man had to aim over his back and make that decision with a much more limited field of view
@Storm™ that's fair enough but the question becomes if that constitutes a situation where you should expect to be ambushed and are therefore provoking violence against you.
@Higai you carry a gun in case you need to defend yourself. You may not realize it but you generally don't hear about the mass shootings that are stopped by civilians defending themselves with guns, nor do you hear about robberies stopped by gun owners, nor do you hear about violent gang attacks stopped by gun owners. All you ever hear about is shootings that weren't stopped. If gun owners didn't ever carry their guns on them, that's all there would ever actually be.
@Micheal Linne who are you trying to kid, he wasn't exactly quoting love poetry to her 🙄..the body language is clear to see in the video, he was trying to intimidate the woman, seeing her as an easy target ...the guy has form, he had on at least FIVE different occasions (that we know of, likely more) brandished a firearm in road rage incidents...this was part of a pattern of well established behaviour, but this time he shot and killed his victim in front of both CCTV and eye witnesses
@annabanananaaaa it's actually a bad idea to try to give a verbal warning most of the time especially in up close situations because speaking forces you into a moment of hesitation and being unfocused and you'd be unable to pull the trigger if that person had reached for your gun or kicked you in the head. Talking only gives your attacker an opportunity. Some attackers may know and use this but also attackers sometimes just do it without even knowing this information.
I wish he would have given a verbal warning in this case or if his attacker had said something like we're good man, no need to shoot or something because at least then there would have been a better chance the shooter could have realized he was in fact backing off and also verbally warning him may have prompted a response to take an action that would more visibly signify surrender like say put your hands up or don't move could have lead to compliance that would clearly pointed to the shift from chaos to control of the situation.
Also it's not really about severity of the actual crime of parking in a disabled parking lot, I think people absolutely should take pictures and report illegal parking in disabled parking spots, it's one of the scummyest things someone can do.
@annabanananaaaa it's entirely different from parking in disabled parking also, he approached the car long before knowing anyone was inside let alone who was so no I don't think it was racially motivated. If you assume that just because they did happen to be black, that means he must be racist than I'm afraid you are the racist.
@Ben Smith yeah, other countries just deny that their people are dying and how because they're afraid of the sensitive subject🤣🤣. Self defense has to be protected or else you just tell people to accept their fate and die or spend their life in prison if their attacked
@Micheal Linne Seeing as how there's no audio, it is impossible for us to know the tone of the conversation. Assuming voices were raised, and the assailant, and victim in this situation, the man who was shot fatally, may have acted proportionally if he believed his wifes and children's life was in danger, the shooter, who claims to have acted in self defense did not react proportionally to being pushed, and clearly excessive force was used simply because it was available to him. The fact that he shot him after walking three steps apparently away from him, and according to his own account shows that he was note acting whole heartedly and entirely in self defense.
@Uuuh h "defending" I presume. He took a step forward and behind a guy that was aiming over his back because he had just been violently thrown to the ground and his torso was still facing him. That would look like coming at him from the shooter's point of view.
@Micheal Linne I think the one thing you're not paying attention to at all is the more emotional side of things. Because I highly doubt that the victim was going actually start beating him up in broad daylight with a bunch of spectators including some of his kids.
If anything, he would have yelled some more at the perp and then either gone back to his business(more likely) or helped him to his feet(less likely).
And this is all besides the fact that the perp shot a man with a family despite having time to really think over his decision.
@LesbianWitchAcademia he would have reported it to the police with pictures if either she hadn't rolled down her window to talk to him or he hadn't ambushed him from behind. I think people should report illegal disabled parking, you can't get much scummyer than doing that.
@LesbianWitchAcademia also he took a step towards and behind the shooter with his torso facing him on the third step and wasn't shot until that exact moment. The shooter had to aim over his back and had a limited field of view and not the privileged one we enjoyed ergo self defense
@Ben Smith definitely. I think everyone probably should go to therapy. That's how we stop exploited and unhappy people from exploding some day when they decide they've had enough and the pressure has become too much. Its a way better solution than just telling people to suck it up
@Ronnie Heuveltje I was actually kinda corrected on the disabled part, it's either that both he and his step mom are disabled or just his step mom because he brought up his step mom as one reason he didn't like people parking illegally in the disabled parking. People are saying it was just a pet peeve but also I think people should report illegal disabled parking, it's one of the scummyest things you can do.
@Razvan Nestor none of us use our real names for accounts, or at least I hope so. I don't know if I would have shot, I personally wouldn't have gotten into or continued that argument, but if I had and had been shoved I'd hope that I'd be able to tell he was surrendering because I like everyone else would rather not take a life if I don't have to and would hope I never feel like I have to. If I had taken the shot I'd hope I wouldn't lie to the police about things like he did and I'd hope I would remember to ask for a lawyer before speaking to them in the first place. He was so focused on trying to protect their perception of him he got rid of his legitimate claim to self defense and frankly cost himself his case.
@Micheal Linne The fact you're justifying what was obviously murder speaks volumes on your psych. Go get help before you end up being the guy in one of these videos
@Someone I've been corrected about the disabled part, apparently it was his stepmother, either way I think it should be documented and reported when someone illegally parks in disabled parking. Also I said at best we can't tell who spoke first though I do think it was probably her, I was just pointing out that you can't tell when the window was rolled down and decided it's pointless to get into a he said she said so I just decided to believe she spoke first because that's what it looks like to me.
@Someone it doesn't matter if he had 3 kids or 100 kids, he started the violence and I think it would look like he was coming back for more from the shooter's point of view
@Jayden that kid had such impressive levels of self control, he didn't shoot a single person who wasn't clearly from any point of view trying to hit him over the head with something, pinning him against a wall while trying to wrestle his gun away from him, or leveling off to shoot him while he couldn't get away. It doesn't get more self defense than that.
@Micheal Linne Should be reported, okay But the guy started walking around the car first, meaning he was already trying to engage. There is a chance she started first, but u can see that he is the one looking at her car, and going around it, so it's still no problem that she would ask him what he is doing. And again, perspective doesn't give u rights to distort real footage, the guy took 3 steps back, it's common sense to use a gun for threat only, and attack only if u r actually getting attacked, if u r incapable of understanding a man who took 3 steps back is backing down, then you should NOT have a gun. If u r incapable of controlling yourself under pressure, u should NOT have a gun. And lastly, ofcourse having kids matter. If u r that innocent of a person, u would think at least twice before shooting someone, u would think a million times before shooting someone in front of their family and kids. The victim did wrong by attacking so violently, but it can by no means justify the guy shooting him.
@Angela Halliwell I'm not sure he actually brandished the firearm. People will see a holstered weapon and think its a threat, that doesn't make it brandishing the firearm. If there was picture or video evidence though I would have to agree that it speaks to his inability to safely handle a firearm
@Micheal Linne Neither u, nor the suspect understand the scale of tragedy of someone getting killed in seconds in front of their family, and collapsing in front of their kid. U can not hold that kind of a horror equal to being shoved or parking in a handicapped place.
@Storm™ it is impossible to know. I just think that third step would look from his point of view like he was coming back for more.
If we had evidence that he was yelling racial expletives at her or threatening her I would throw self defense out the window because that would constitute asking for violence and a readily present need for the man to use violence to defend his wife
@Micheal Linne also your whole argument is wrong. He gets shot in the third step. He doesn't even have time to do anything. Sees the gun One full step Second full step Third, his back is turned, still looking at the guy, u can see he is stepping forward, away from the suspect, and without being able to complete the third step he gets shot. U can tell that the guy shoved to the ground wanted revenge. It's not brain surgery.
@SIAED actually you have a good point. I didn't consider this would have been in front of his kids. I don't think that necessarily removes self defense though unless we can prove the shooter knew those kids were there and that they were this man's kids. If those two things are true I think that definitely changes things especially since it's not like this man had been verbally threatening him as it was all purely physical threats.
@Micheal Linne U know that your argument doesn't make sense. If someone is moving away from u, someone is moving away from u Again, if u r that bad at judging threat, then ofcourse u should NOT have a gun. And if u r not trustable with a gun, then that means u should NOT have it. If u r capable of hurting innocent ppl, at the first problem U face, it means u shouldn't have it. That easy.
@Bella N I must have missed the part he had said that but while that speaks to his character that doesn't make it not self defense. Another commenter gave me a new viewpoint on the matter though and I kind of agree with him that the man probably wouldn't have beat the shooter in front of his own kids so I think if we had proof the shooter had definitely known those kids were there and were this man's kids it would throw self defense completely out the window.
@Vilesentry What are you even talking about. I never said it was justified or argued for it. I'm just saying that you went after someone's character for hypothetical situations that are made up by you. The whole "Bet you wish he shot his whole family too" rant you went on about is just baseless assumptions and you never challenged his argument, you just assume racism and used it as a crutch. Which is annoying to see. The case didn't have anything to do with race besides the fact that race exists in our civilization and the people in the confrontation were 2 different races.
@Micheal Linne Gun is for life or death situations Usually if u face danger, if u get shoved to ground U Back down, call police So untill the point to murdering someone U have a bunch of things u could go to. But if u see gun as the easy option so when u face any level of danger, u just shoot someone It means, u r incapable of understanding the responsibility, controlling yourself, and judging a situation. It's the same for driving. If u r incapable of sensing when to stop, if u r too slow at reacting to sudden things, then it means u should not drive because u t putting other's life at danger.
@Someone i agred with that last part assuming the shooter knew those kids were there and were this man's kids. If he knew then that throws self defense out the window because it seriously reduces the likely hood this man would have beat him because it was in front of his kids
@Someone again i think it looked very different from the shooter's view point. I think that third step looked towards him and I think his torso was still towards him at that moment.
@Micheal Linne I checked , so TWO incidents where he was reported to police for physically threatening other road users with a gun, a further incident for which he was accused of Dangerous Driving by police after he deliberately caused a crash out of spite, and more interestingly a few months earlier he has had a standoff over the same parking spot !! threatening to shoot the person parking in the handicap bay, and using racial slurs towards him...it's very much a pattern of behaviour, , I get the uneasy feeling that that confrontation earlier that year was a form of "dress rehearsal" he was waiting for the right "opportunity" See quote from Wikipedia ""Ricky Kelly, a male truck driver claims Drejka confronted him over parking his employer's tanker truck in the handicapped space. He accuses Drejka of threatening to shoot him and using a racial slur. The store owner Salous intervened and ordered Drejka to stop or else he would call the police, to whom Drejka replied, "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After the incident Drejka calls the company the driver works for and complains to the owner John Tyler, reportedly saying the driver was "lucky I didn't blow his head off." The driver reports this incident to the police in July after the shooting of Markeis McGlockton at the same location.
@Uuuh h I agree now but only because another commenter gave me more information that made it clear that this guy definitely deserves jail time. Context that wasn't in the video
@Micheal Linne If it were about subjective threats, no one would ever be convicted because they could just use "I was scared" as a defense. That shit only works with cops because of qualified immunity and all that nonsense. The castle doctrine is NOT stand your ground, and there is more to it than duty to retreat. Only in stand your ground laws is there no longer any duty to retreat or refrain. But with castle, you cannot shoot a burglar who has surrendered to you, because it means they are no longer an imminent threat. This is absolutely objective too. It is not "oh, well, I certainly felt threatened, even though he was on his stomach with his hands behind his head." That doesnt work with castle doctrine, and depending on the prosecutors office, it might not work with stand your ground either. There is a very narrow legal definition of "imminent threat," which "means a condition of noncompliance that is reasonably certain to place life or limb in direct peril and is immediate and impending and not merely remote, uncertain, or contingent." That last part is particularly important here, and totally contradicts everything you just said. Perhaps you don't know more than me about law, perhaps because you didn't bother doing some basic googling. NOT MERELY REMOTE, UNCERTAIN, OR CONTINGENT. Get that through that thick skull of yours. it might save your ass someday from a manslaughter charge.
1, this guy was prone and his assailant was still standing
2, his assailant was from his point of view maneuvering to step behind him and towards him. That's where the subjective part becomes important btw, the point of view of the person in question claiming self defense is not only important, it's everything. He had to aim over his back, he did not have the privileged view that we do. Point of view is subjective because it relies on the position of the person in question. That person could not have seen what was happening from a disembodied overhead point of view like we did. He was after all, on the ground.
3, stand your ground isn't even necessary to apply to call it self defense, he was on the ground and thus unable to retreat so the only thing that matters is if from his point of view a reasonable person would percieve a threat on their life.
4, it wasn't remote, uncertain or contingent on anything as his assailant was less than 5 feet away and was stepping behind and towards him, had just thrown him to the ground in a surprise attack, and hadn't given any indication that if he did something specific he'd assault and kill him, the assault wasn't even clearly linked to any actions he had taken at this point, we only know why he did it after the fact.
5, I already agreed this guy deserved to go to jail after another commenter gave information that wasn't provided in this video that made it very clear way beyond what the video covered that this guy very likely was looking for a fight, so why don't you pay attention instead of continuing an argument that ended so long ago that you're not only late to the table, the bank is foreclosing on the mfing house and the guy you're looking for has already moved twice?
@Jon Osterman you're the one that called me out after the argument was already over and insulted me. Responding may not have been necessary but don't worry, I figured I'd explain to you why nothing you said contradicted anything anyways. If you still don't get that then you're just choosing to ignore the facts and arguing because you're upset that I disagree with you. If you don't think point of view is important there are thousands of cases for you to go find where it was ruled self defense because the person would reasonably percieve it that way from their point of view even when evidence shows that person wasn't in danger from a better and ultimately privileged point of view.
My husband is a quadriplegic in a wheelchair, and uses a lift that requires handicap parking. Typically people that misuse handicap spots do so because theyre in a hurry, and not malicious. Sometimes I just park right behind them perpendicularly and slowly take my time unloading my husband. My hope is that I slow them down enough to make them think about thier choices next time. Maybe seeing a helpless man being loaded or unloaded from a handicap van might show them another perspective. But I damn sure am not gonna kill or hurt someone over a parking spot.
Love your comment. Good judgement. No one deserves to die over something that can be fixed. I don't like people who park in a disabled lot but we can't solve that with violence.
I mean he didn't kill anyone over taking up a handicap spot, he did so over being pushed to the ground. Everything he's done was perfectly fine and justified, until he pulled the trigger.
He didn't shot him for parking wtf !!! r u saying, he shot him because he thought that guy was gonna fck him up, he was arguing with that women from a good distance it was her husband who thought its ok to assault a man just because he was bigger than him imagine if that man was an officer on duty would he do that NOOOOOO he would talk first .. so why did he assault him??
@Girish Gopal dude pushed him because he was getting aggressive with his girlfriend. How was he to know if that coward was going to lay hands on her or not? He defended his woman as he should have.
@Unfriendly Black Hottie It's really hard to think right when meeting this kind of situation, he just pushed him showing maybe his anger towards this man's wrong decision to occupy the space wc suppose only for disable person, but the reaction was too much, to take someone's life for such a senseless reason
Bless you for loving your husband and helping him through his struggle. Being a quadriplegic must be a nightmare, it is good that he has you to help care for him.
The problem with boxing them in is the same ignorant jerk who parks in the handicap spot is sometimes the same ignorant jerk that will shoot you for boxing him in. I wouldn't take that risk if I was concerned about my spouses safety.
I also have had this problem before when people yell at my mother in a wheelchair asking if they could move to the next spot. If I was older at that time I would also be charged with manslaughter.
yeah whenever my dad parks in one I always remind him but he always makes sure that whatever he does he does it fast. we never go into an actual store while in a handicapped parking its usually a convenience store or the cleaners
This dude definitely deserved to go to prison and that dude didn’t deserve to get shot. However, if this had been a black guy shooting a white guy in the same situation, this comment section would have A LOT more “they shouldn’t have parked handicap” or “he shouldn’t have shoved them to the ground” because it’s completely okay to hate white people purely for the color of their skin.
That’s the most profound learning lesson. Can’t say I’ve ever parked in a handicap spot(usually park farthest away from cars as possible so no one hits my car). Lol Bless you for being so damn patient and a better person then me cause I know If I was in your shoes there’s no way I’d handle it as mature as you do.
He didn't kill him over the spot but because the clown out of nowhere comes out and pushes him I woulda beat tf outta that clown for doing that tf he think he is
Would you expect to be pushed to the ground if you did decide to explain why someone shouldn’t park in a handicap spot? I think there’s no question this was manslaughter...but I also think the man would be alive if he didn’t attack the man in the first place. Personally, I don’t think it’s his job to police the parking lot...but he did.
@Saltcor I think when you try and reverse the race in this situation it’s hard to say what exactly would happen. Especially since I see that you’re trying to make a point so obviously you’re going to state what you’d expect others to comment. If in fact this did happen, it would be reverse racism.
You just never know, my theory is to continue on my errand and bitch about it later to my husband... If I were with a genuinely handicapped person I would probably tell the clerk.
@Girish Gopal Its emotions, its emotions simply because if something like that has not happened before there is no way to prepare for it. Some people are better able to deal with pressure.
yeah so you park and intentionally slow down someone who isn't trying to take up a spot for very long? That makes you just as petty as the person you are talking about. 99% of the time handicapped parking spots don't even get used so if I gotta take up that spot for 30 seconds I don't feel bad about it. I find it irritating that all the good parking spots up front and close are almost always empty.
I think it’s about reasonableness. If there’s a lot of free spots and someone is in a rush I’ll give them a pass. It’s just about being considerate to others
Michael Frazia2021-04-18 00:52:32 (edited 2021-04-18 00:54:21 )
@YOU
⬋
༼ ༼ ༼ ⃝ꅟ𓂺⬅ME you don't put hands on people ..personally I wouldn't shoot someone, but I am not the type who gets hands put on him( not saying I'm a tough guy , but I try to just live and let live) , but when you put your hands on people especially smaller people than you are taking a huge risk
If there is someone in or near the car I walk upto the car and flick my flashlight on and off on my phone too pretend I've taken a photo, 8/10 times they move within 2 mins if they see me, the other 2 times they freak out and ask me to delete the photo 🤣
Till an angry man comes out and pushes your husband out of his wheelchair onto the ground... Then starts to kick him on the ground into a bloody mess and he wishes he had a gun for self-defense but didn't and ends up handicap and now many injuries. I think both parties messed up big time, so not taking sides. But fact is this man with his family would still be alive if he didn't come out resorting to violence first off and the other man didn't need to pull the trigger but was in-line to have his gun out and aimed and if further aggression, I'd imagine their would be no prison time. Lack of consideration for handicap(general lack of consideration too) is annoying and I actually respect the man going up to the car and his first initial complaints, it's just he took it too far at the end with the gun shot.
If he really was annoyed or concerned about the spot he would have politely ask the woman in the car to tell his husband or whoever was driving to be mindful where he parks next time and see if there's a way to move the car (spare key or if it's going to take a while maybe go get the keys and move it), that was not the issue. The issue is that he wanted to start a fight and feel superior in some way, then he got physically attacked and because he is a coward pull out he is gone and on top of that he was waiting to any excuse to use it so he did
He def wasn’t intending to kill anyone over a handicap spot , it was after he got push and slammed to the floor , in my eyes he defended himself. The guy should of never put his hands on him. You do that and what happens after is a consequence. Period.
@YOU
⬋
༼ ༼ ༼ ⃝ꅟ𓂺⬅ME if someone is verbally arguing with your wife or significant other in a distance .. is ok to slam them to the floor out of nowhere instead of saying hey what’s going on or saying something to stop it or deescalate the situation like a normal person?! If he couldn’t do that than the guy who shot him couldn’t either. Both were wrong.
Micheale Currin he was arguing from a good distance away, he couldn't have hurt her in the car anyway. Marquez could have come out and confronted Drejka, instead he assaults him from behind, and though the arm injury seems to have been fake, he could have very well shattered his arm, broken his hip, his leg, or caused any kind of other injury because he was arguing over a parking spot. His first act is violence, so I doubt he would have stopped after just pushing him. I'm not trying to defend Drejka, but Marquez was just as stupid here
@Rich Schnippel The situation was very specific , and both parties acted inappropriately . (Killing person too far ) usually happens a lot watching cinema being annoying angering other party the killing them because they attacked him .
I am disabled veteran. I have a handicap placard. Sometimes I use it and at times I don't. It all depends on how much I hurt that day. I see cars park in the handicap parking all the time. I would never confront a person for doing this to avoid what happened in this video. I would rather limp a little further to get to my destination. I've seen enough blood for one life time. With that said I do believe in protecting myself or anyone else. A fine line I try to avoid at all cost.
But there is another point to be had here: everyone in this altercation was wrong in their actions, and a whole bunch of lives got ruined for it. Even just parking in the handicap spot should make you question yourself, "should I really be doing this?"
@TransRoofKorean Kay but shooting someone and killing them in front of their children unnecessarily should give you a *little more pause than parking in a handicap spot. I get what you’re saying, but no.
@TransRoofKorean To even suggest that parking in the handicap spot and killing another human being are even in the same stratosphere of wrong is completely dehumanizing the victim and the situation, are you insane.
@Patroclus unfortunately that is an issue and nothing can replace a human life but fear and trauma is a thing that can twist the mind so terribly that even the most logical solution or the most morally correct solution is ignored. I’m certainly not proud of my country’s history, though i’d like to have faith in people no matter what they’ve done as long as they have humanity
@gothic_ratboi I respect the individual on a certain level for putting their life on the line. But let's not create a narrative that they've given freedom to their country in regards to wars and conflicts where that was never in contention. Very few service people outside of say the second world war have ever fought for anything remotely meaningful. They deserve pity, but they shouldn't be honoured as custodians of freedom when that is far from the truth.
@Patroclus i think i miscommunicated my point, i totally agree with you, american history tends to idolize meaningless wars and say that it provided freedom when in reality it fueled fear. i meant to show that i respect this person for putting their life on the line because though i haven’t seen death, i have PTSD from past trauma and couldn’t imagine how much more scarring it would be to have to be to fight on the field (i was diagnosed btw)
Nowhere near the same circumstances as you, but I agree that there is absolutely no reason to escalate such a trivial interaction to the point of a confrontation let alone a fatal confrontation.
@LeciPeci because teaching your son that you can do whatever you want and treat people however you want is a great lesson. I'm sure the kid is better off without this wonderful role model
Iv used a placard on and off depending how I feel that day. I also would never feel the need to confront someone that I just felt was being selfish or lazy. Maybe they just didn’t notice. It’s not the crime of the century
OK...! I'm 74 year old man, got a really beat-up set of legs...I could get a 'Card' but just let it go to others who need it more...I can just walk a hundred feet more, like I did at CostCo yesterday....still funny to see able-bodied people 'circling' the parking lot, waiting for a closer space to the store.
The black guy took a running start and pushed him hard from behind, gave him whiplash and then was looking at him like, what's up!??? Pulled up his shorts again and was ready to fight, waiting for him to get up so he can punch him.
So to say that guy was the victim is ridiculous. I am a liberal but I am so tired of people on both sides not being objective and honest.
@TransRoofKorean My boy here would look at that dad who killed his child for eating his father's day cake and unironically say "everyone in this altercation was wrong in their actions, and a whole bunch of lives got ruined for it" lmao
@Patroclus But I also don't think that individuals should be demonised for being in the armed forces. It's, unfortunately, really not up to them what horrific shit show they're going to be expected to involve themselves in.
@Kira Py'romantic I saw a really depressing documentary a little while ago and a young guy (about 20?) with terminal cancer was relentlessly harassed by strangers, even though he had disabled plates on his car. He even went so far as to carry around a signed note from his doctor confirming his terminal diagnosis. People are arseholes.
probably smart. I'd avoid people who park illegally in handicapped spots too. I'd assume they were bad and dangerous people to begin with. If they dont care about the disabled, they sure wouldnt give a damn about the safety of people around them.
@Cobalt360Degrees I mean...fuck, dude. All that fella actually said was that parking in a disabled spot is wrong. It's not like the dude was dancing on anyone's graves. Do you really think that acknowledging that parking there was wrong suddenly means he's comparing an illegal park with murder? That's kinda fucking dumb, dude. He explicitly said that dude A did something wrong and didn't deserve to die for it, right?
Every right comes with a responsibility. As someone concealed carrying you have a responsibility not to instigate situations that could escalate to physical confrontations. He should have minded his own business.
I did notice when Michael pulled up, there were parking spots open along the entire front of the building-(much closer to the door) but he choose to pull in right next to their car instead-which certainly shows he wasn't just 'shopping' but in reality, he was just looking for trouble and a fight.
bill nalder ——He mentioned ‘protecting his family’, I’m kinda thinking he lives w/his elderly mom and he has some way of knowing when someone parks in that spot, as if that’s his job.
Bill nalder He didn't park in a space. That corner where he parked, was not a parking space. They were in a disabled space, but he chose to park illegally so that his car was closer to hers. He drove up to her car, illegally parked, got out and circled the car, then went up to the window, and then from the video, he seemingly started yelling at her. The man comes out and sees some random dude is screaming at his wife, and so he shoves angry gun guy. That was a bad idea, but I get it. Angry gun guy saw his opportunity to shoot up a black man, assuming that nobody would give two fucks. That was really, really bad idea.
Exactly what I was thinking. He obviously always had his gun on him to be ready to pull it out and use it. And I could imagine he was provoking confrontation all the time simply to justify using his gun. Not with equal opponents though, always weaker, unarmed people because he’s a coward.
Woman shouldn’t have parked her car in the handicap spot. Her bf shouldn’t have blindsided this guy. This guy should not have shot the bf. Everyone in this situation is wrong. That being said, the shooter definitely belongs in prison.
St. Matthew 5 And seeing the multitudes, He went up into a mountain, and when he was set down, his disciples came unto him.
2 And opening his mouth, he taught them, saying:
3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 Blessed are the meek: for they shall possess the land.
5 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
6 Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice and righteousness: for they shall have their fill.
7 Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
8 Blessed are the clean and pure of heart: for they shall see Lord God, the King.
9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called children of Lord God, the King.
10 Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11 Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake:
12 Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. For so they persecuted the prophets that were before you.
13 You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt lose its savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is good for nothing any more but to be cast out, and to be trodden on by men.
14 You are the light of the world. A city seated on a mountain cannot be hid.
15 Neither do men light a candle and put it under a bushel, but upon a candlestick, that it may shine to all that are in the house.
16 So let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father Lord God, the King who is in heaven.
17 Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
18 For amen I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot, or one tittle shall not pass of the law, till all be fulfilled.
19 He therefore that shall break one of these least commandments, and shall so teach men, shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven. But he that shall do and teach, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20 For I tell you, that unless your justice and righteousness abound more than that of the scribes and Pharisees, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
21 You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not murder. And whosoever shall murder shall be in danger of the judgment.
22 But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou Fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
23 If therefore thou offer thy gift at the altar, and there thou remember that thy brother hath any thing against thee;
24 Leave there thy offering before the altar, and go first to be reconciled to thy brother: and then coming thou shalt offer thy gift.
25 Be at agreement with thy adversary betimes, whilst thou art in the way with him: lest perhaps the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
26 Amen I say to thee, thou shalt not go out from thence till thou repay the last farthing.
27 You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not commit adultery.
28 But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.
29 And if thy right eye scandalize thee, pluck it out and cast it from thee. For it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell.
30 And if thy right hand scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell.
31 And it hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a bill of divorce.
32 But I say to you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, excepting for the cause of fornication, maketh her to commit adultery: and he that shall marry her that is put away, committeth adultery.
33 Again you have heard that it was said to them of old, Thou shalt not forswear thyself: but thou shalt perform thy oaths to the Lord God, the King.
34 But I say to you not to swear at all, neither by heaven, for it is the throne of Lord God, the King:
35 Nor by the earth, for it is his footstool: nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great king:
36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.
37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.
38 You have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.
39 But I say to you not to resist evil: but if one strike thee on thy right cheek, turn to him also the other:
40 And if a man will contend with thee in judgment, and take away thy coat, let go thy cloak also unto him.
41 And whosoever will force thee one mile, go with him other two,
42 Give to him that asketh of thee and from him that would borrow of thee turn not away.
43 You have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thy enemy.
44 But I say to you, Holy Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you:
45 That you may be the children of your Father Lord God, the King who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust.
46 For if you love them that love you, what reward shall you have? do not even the publicans this?
47 And if you salute your brethren only, what do you more? do not also the heathens this?
48 Be you therefore holy perfect, as also your holy heavenly Father Lord God, the King is perfect.
Since the dawn of time I'm sure men have pushed other men, especially when their woman is being harassed for a stupid reason. Is that grounds to kill someone? His life wasn't in danger. He needed to mind his p's qnd q's and walk away after being pushed.
Revelation 18 And after these things, I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power: and the earth was enlightened with his glory.
2 And he cried out with a strong voice, saying: Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen; and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every unclean spirit, and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird:
3 Because all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication; and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her; and the merchants of the earth have been made rich by the power of her delicacies.
4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues.
5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and the Lord God hath remembered her iniquities.
6 Render to her as she also hath rendered to you; and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup wherein she hath mingled, mingle ye double unto her.
7 As much as she hath glorified herself, and lived in delicacies, so much torment and sorrow give ye to her; because she saith in her heart: I sit a queen, and am no widow; and sorrow I shall not see.
8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine, and she shall be burnt with the fire; because Lord God is strong, who shall judge her.
9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication, and lived in delicacies with her, shall weep, and bewail themselves over her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning:
10 Standing afar off for fear of her torments, saying: Alas! alas! that great city Babylon, that mighty city: for in one hour is thy judgment come.
11 And the merchants of the earth shall weep, and mourn over her: for no man shall buy their merchandise any more.
12 Merchandise of gold and silver, and precious stones; and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner of vessels of ivory, and all manner of vessels of precious stone, and of brass, and of iron, and of marble,
13 And cinnamon, and odours, and ointment, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.
14 And the fruits of the desire of thy soul are departed from thee, and all fat and goodly things are perished from thee, and they shall find them no more at all.
15 The merchants of these things, who were made rich, shall stand afar off from her, for fear of her torments, weeping and mourning.
16 And saying: Alas! alas! that great city, which was clothed with fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and was gilt with gold, and precious stones, and pearls.
17 For in one hour are so great riches come to nought; and every shipmaster, and all that sail into the lake, and mariners, and as many as work in the sea, stood afar off.
18 And cried, seeing the place of her burning, saying: What city is like to this great city?
19 And they cast dust upon their heads, and cried, weeping and mourning, saying: Alas! alas! that great city, wherein all were made rich, that had ships at sea, by reason of her prices: for in one hour she is made desolate.
20 Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for Lord God hath judged your judgment on her.
21 And a mighty angel took up a stone, as it were a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying: With such violence as this shall Babylon, that great city, be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.
22 And the voice of harpers, and of musicians, and of them that play on the pipe, and on the trumpet, shall no more be heard at all in thee; and no craftsman of any art whatsoever shall be found any more at all in thee; and the sound of the mill shall be heard no more at all in thee;
23 And the light of the lamp shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth, for all nations have been deceived by thy enchantments.
24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.
that's exactly what I thought too. even if the man hadn't died, a person who will shoot to kill just for fear of his ass getting "moderately" kicked, I do not think someone like that should be left out to his own devices. he's clearly got a few screws loose.
It reminds me of when kids get in trouble for fighting and start playing up their injuries to seem like the other is in the wrong, but eventually becomes like a badge of honour. Like a “yeah… my arm really hurts, I’m a tough though so it’s not a big deal”
You learn from as young as kindergarten what an appropriate response to physical provocation is. You can't murder someone for pushing you over, especially if you're the one who initiated the confrontation by acting aggressively and threatening towards a man's wife and small children.
@Herbert West lol how is the guy being aggressive he just ask why you parked on the wheelchair execrable parking spot. Instead of just moving you wait for your husband to take it physical and the guy protect himself
I am totally against and outraged at every action this guy took from beginning to end. Being handicapped myself and requiring the handicapped spot, I still get confronted by people like this guy who wants to challenge why I’m parking in the spot. One time I forgot to put the placard out and had some guy get in my face about stealing the spot and being lazy, etc. I then told him I’m a veteran, I’ve had 5 surgeries and more hardware in my body than he had in his shopping cart. He then apologized and said “thanks for your service and reached his hand out to shake mine. I then told him to go eff himself. People should just mind their own business. There are times I use the spots when I’m feeling terrible, and there are times I don’t use it and want to walk in the store like everyone else. To people watching this video and empathizing with this guy because they take the same position as he does - which is confronting people and not minding their own business - use this POS as a warning to you. You have no right to challenge anyone just because you feel like you’re entitled to. People, even if they are wrong by mistakenly or on purposefully parking in the wrong spot, have the same rights as you do. MIND YOUR OWN FREAKIN BUSINESS and keep your noses where they belong. If you’re a police officer on duty, that’s one thing. But if you’re a private citizen that’s quite another. This guy got exactly what he deserved for not minding his own business. And to the family of this gentleman that was merely protecting his wife, I am terribly sorry for your loss. I stand with you!
2 likes
kelly hill2022-03-14 23:53:02 (edited 2022-03-14 23:55:30 )
Bottom line both men were wrong. The man that shoved him to the ground was wrong to put hands on him. And this guy's response was inproportionate. On the flip side of that;the guy that shoved him ha@to know that there are people like this out there. I'm not blaming the victim here I'm just saying that he bares some of the responsibility here. But in the end the verdict was correct.
“I’m not blaming the victim here” … “[the victim] bares responsibility here”. This is cognitive dissonance. Does someone deserve to die because they shoved you?
@James Mel bares "SOME" of the responsibility here. If you are going to comment and quote the other person's comment you at least need to be cognitive enough to get it right.plus you cherry picked a portion of it to try and make a point that quite frankly is moot if you leave out portions of the comment that are key components in what the person is saying.
The actual lesson: don’t park on a handicap spot cuz you might get killed by a psycho.(bruh...as a european im totally confused how the prosecuter says he was even in his right to grab the gun after he got pushed).
@bert wert Why? It makes sense to me as a european. If this isnt the time to grab a gun when is it then? Firing after the guy would charge (which didnt happen) makes sense too. But he obviously did a terrible mistake in firing at a retreating man
@Guyin Apocket Yep, that's how I see it. Grab the gun to get the assaulter to back off...which he did. But that guy was LARPing and had to pull the trigger.
@FallenSully That's what I say. If the police start asking questions I would ask if I was under arrest. If they say no then I would leave. If I'm under arrest then I get my lawyer. Never talk to the police!
thats because this man really didn't think he didn't anything wrong. In his mind, he was completely justified. "Man pushed me, I shot man. Oh well" He didn't even care if he knew he killed the guy because he didn't see anything wrong
Dude, that's the scariest part of all these videos!! The lunatics REALLY think they're gna walk away from this shit with their spectacular skills in manipulation
@Prius Girl 🧚♂️ That seems logical, but someone who honestly thinks they did nothing wrong would want to speak to the police to, in their minds, clear the air about what happened. In that situation refusing to talk to the police would seem suspicious. I believe this guy still to this day thinks he was in the right.
@bert wert As a European it makes sense. Pushing someone to the ground, gives him a significant disadvantage. Someone with a gun is especially in danger. I can even see justification for shooting him.
I think speaking to a lawyer should be automatic, people don't really understand their rights when they agree to talk. Not speaking to a lawyer should be an opt-out type of thing.
Nope Jeff made the rules 1) ask him if you are under arrest, if no leave, if yes 2) what am I under arrest for? 3) what is the evidence against me 4) ask to be taken to the cell 5) ask for coke and pizza if they want to talk 6) tell him you know what he is doing trying to make you say incriminating stuff 7) ask him if they are playing good cop, tell him he is a prick. 8) only say simple facts about the time of arrest and repeat them a million times like I was just walking home when you guys assaulted me. 9) don't discuss the crime itself, 10) keep taking shots at the police
No offense to whoever that deffence lawyer is but he needs to get a new job. He just gives off villain vibes, he sounds like hes trying to manipulate the jury and judge.
This guy cries over some dogs but doesn't cry over his wife being left behind or the children who lost their father for no reason...or the woman who lost her husband.
I would have done the same thing , after being assaulted and shoved to the ground its not because the guy backed that he is not a treat anymore , specially since while backing up he kept his hands down and could have easily pulled a gun , we see it in many police shootout videos , a man being held at gun point by officers and get blown away for having their hands doing sketchy stuff
Also ,Its not because you know that you can provoke an altercation that its excuse the fact that he got assaulted ... wtf is that argument
That video just shows one thing , what ever you get arrested for either if you did the right or wrong thing, dont talk to the police. They can only make things work for you , they are not there to help you
The fact that this dude straight up murdered someone and is still more concerned about the handicapping spot than he is about the life he took is just awful
The lawyer has a stupid point about the camera footage. Who cares that the camera is standard quality and doesn't show saturated colors. As far as I am concerned, a dude backing away without color is still a dude backing away.
A lawyer has a duty to his client to make the best possible case and exhaust every argument in their defence. It's a pretty rubbish point I'll agree, but while his client was pleading innocent he was right to make it.
Just as an example of what I think is the prosecution doing the same sort of thing - he talks about how he didn't shoot in the "toe foot knee calf thigh" etc etc but it is my understanding most gun self-defence experts will tell you that if you intend to stop someone you should aim centre of mass, and at that range its not going to veer off to hit a leg or a hand. And it is the prosecutions duty to exhaust all possible arguments so again he is right to make it.
@drysoup That apparently means dropping any kind of humanity for some. Defending such cases which such arguments, is nearly justifying what he did. Horrible in my opinion
@drysoup I second this. It is the very nature of the US legal system, known as the adversarial system, to work in this way: A lawyer has a duty to give the best possible case for their client, and we have two lawyers to make the best possible for and against case. THAT then goes to an independent jury to decide guilt based on those arguments. THAT then goes to an experienced legal expert, the judge, to determine an appropriate sentence.
It can "feel" like a defence lawyer is protecting evil people if you assume someone is guilty, but the defence lawyer is part of the system to ensure justice and every part must do their best to ensure justice comes out the other end.
It is a foundational statement in US justice that is better to let ten guilty men go free than to punish an innocent man (Black Stone's ratio from Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765 and inherited by the US legal system) and that is why the defence lawyer must make the best possible case. To do anything else, literally any thing less than their very best, is to fail their duty to their client, to the citizens of the USA, and the very concept of justice.
Attorneys aren't required to always get their defendant off scot-free. Their duty is to provide the fairest trial possible. If that means grainy footage comes into question, then he has a responsibility to make that argument, however silly.
@Mark Farmer pushing someone away who is harrassing your wife and children isn't grounds to be killed, which is why the shooter is in prison. If the victim had pushed the shooter and then proceeded to continue attacking him, it might be a different story, but that's not what happened.
He got shot within half a second of starting to back away, which wasn't enough time for the shooter to decide to risk his own life by allowing that thug to continue his attack. The THUG was indeed continuing to advance toward the shooter to continue the violent assault, and only STARTED to back away when the gun was pulled. The shooter was justified in fearing for his life.
@b gilley Nah, the THUG who violently shoved the real victim is the one who initiated it. People are allowed to peacefully speak to other people, which is what the victim was doing when he was wrongfully attacked by the now dead thug.
@James O'Blivion exactly, I don't understand why these people think that any physical confrontation automatically justifies a lethal response. It's scary to think that some of these same people are probably walking around armed. If the victim in this case had tried to beat the shooter while he was on the ground, then maybe a shooting would be justified. In this case though the victim was backing away and was executed in cold blood. Look at the way the shooter tracks him with his gun when he's running into the store, this is not the action of a man who's not in control of his actions.
b gilley I agree. And his face when the policeman told him that HIS victim was dead. He didn’t care AT ALL.
He knew from the beginning that going towards a person and asking this person justification for whatever reason knowing he was NO ONE could have turned ugly. But he felt safe BECAUSE he had a gun. It is normal for him to go towards someone LESS than 21 feet from this person (when he went to the window of the woman’s car and even in front of her car), but when someone does the same : he has to shoot for his own safety. Wtf? Even if the victim had kicked him or whatever (and it didn’t happen), it was not a reason to be killed.
AND it is said it’s not the first time his doing it. He was used to provoke people and show his gun when people got mad at HIS BEHAVIOUR! If it was not for this family, this incident would have happen someday.
I can’t get how those people in the comments can defend a trash like him... That guy belongs to jail. I hope he’s gonna be rotting there for life. He’s dangerous.
5 likes
b gilley2020-09-26 08:53:56 (edited 2020-09-26 08:55:20 )
@Lily Ka's Vegan garden exactly, this guy had pulled his gun in road rage incidents multiple times before, he shouldn't have been allowed to legally carry. And yes, I'm sure if the races of the people in this shooting were reversed, these people would be calling the shooter a thug, and calling the victim a hero for defending his family. It's sick.
@Steven Gomez Sorry but shoving someone isn't grounds to be shot in cold blood, which is why the shooter is in jail. It's sick that you don't care at all about someone actually dying, but you're all bent out of shape over someone being shoved?
@Steven Gomez and again, you totally downplay the actions of the shooter, and attack the victim. The victim in this case did not start the altercation either, the shooter did. Anyone with half a brain knows that if you randomly start a verbal altercation with a woman in public, there's a significant chance you're going to anger her spouse or significant other who may be nearby, and yet you place no responsibility for starting the altercation on the shooter. And given the shooter's clear lack of judgement in this case, how can you be sure he wouldn't have ended up shooting the woman if the victim hadn't intervened and shoved him away? We also don't know what the shooter was saying to the woman, if he was being verbally threatening, then again, the victim would have had every right, both morally and legally, to push him away. Yet you act as if you know for certain the victim was morally wrong, when you don't even know key info on the case. Whether the victim was right or wrong for shoving the shooter, his act was at worse a misdemeanor, and should have been handled by law enforcement, what he did in no way warranted him being shot.
I was stunned when I saw the lawyer's argues that nonsense about the allegedly poor quality of the footage (which, for the purpose of the prosecution's case, was good enough). Quibbling about the quality of the footage? Really?! In such a case the entire focus of the defence should be on one thing and one thing alone: the self-defence argument.
@Raverly G But he didn't continue to attack, and he was backing away, which is why the shooter is in jail. Sorry but the possibility that someone might attack, when they are not in the process of attacking, and in fact are retreating, isn't grounds to execute them.
It’s just the defendant’s attorney looking for literally any excuse at all to use to “prove” his client’s “innocence.”
0 likes
b gilley2020-10-04 13:56:07 (edited 2020-10-04 13:57:03 )
@Andrew I totally agree, the shooter clearly had to know he could trigger a confrontation by verbally harrassing a woman and her children in a public place. As a gun carrier you have an increased responsibility to avoid creating any type of conflict, you absolutely cannot just go around picking fights and then shooting anyone who responds in a way that you don't like.
0 likes
b gilley2020-10-06 19:49:01 (edited 2020-10-06 19:49:16 )
@Porkchop Periwinkle one, he pushed him from the side, not from behind. Two depending on the situation and what is being said, you absolutely can legally push someone who is verbally harrassing your wife. Two it doesn't matter even if the push was an unjustified assault, that doesn't give Drejka the right to execute a man in cold blood, which is why he's in jail.
@Porkchop Periwinkle haha, yeah you're right, Drejka isn't rotting in jail, he's on some beach somewhere sipping a nice cocktail. Jesus you trolls get more delusional every day.
@Porkchop Periwinkle Guy, there's a term called excessive self-defence. Which basically means that you shouldn't punch someone in the face because of a shoulder pat, or shoot them because of being pushed. This is also brought up in the "The case of Michael Dunn" video on this channel. To narrow it down to when guns are in the picture you could generally say that you don't have the right to seriously harm or kill someone with a firearm when attacked/threatened as long as there's not enough reason to believe that the other party is actually capable of doing serious harm themselves. To apply this rule on this case. Since the victim was unarmed and therefore unable to seriously harm Drejka he didn't have enough reason to shoot the victim. Especially because the victim wasn't advancing towards Drejka.
@Porkchop Periwinkle And you might say "well Drejka didn't know if the victim did or didn't have a gun". But if there is no indication of a gun or knife you should always start out from the assumption that the other person is unarmed. Because you as the armed person start out from a position of power against unarmed people and hold a responsibility to not use your weapon recklessly. You clearly haven't seriously studied the law so please stop talking from ignorance.
0 likes
b gilley2020-10-10 13:23:14 (edited 2020-10-10 13:23:40 )
@Turquoise Cheetah actually it very much depends on what was being said. Freedom of speech doesn't apply to threatening someone. If Drejka was making threatening comments while standing in such close proximity to the victim's family, he would be absolutely within his rights to push Drejka away. So no, it isn't automatically an assault charge, it very much depends on the circumstances. For example what if Drejka had said something like "if you don't move this car I've got the firepower to fucking make you move it", or made some other reference to getting violent towards her or the child involved. In such a case the victim would absolutely be within his rights to push Drejka away from his family. On the other hand it could also be an assualt depending on what exactly was said and how Drejka was behaving, but even so it doesn't matter, Drejka still had no right to shoot the man, which is why he's in jail.
@Porkchop Periwinkle sorry but no, there are absolutely situations where it's ok to shove someone away from yourself or other people based on verbal threats. If someone comes up to you in a public place and begins threatening you and or your family for example, if you shove them away it's not necessarily a case of assault, it can be viewed as an act of self defense. You're assuming that in order to push someone away from yourself or your family they need to touch you first, this simply isn't true. And the scenarios I'm putting forth could absolutely apply to the case, because we don't know what Drejka said, there's no audio recording of the confrontation. Drejka literally has a history of threatening others in road rage incidents, with his gun, and you're going to pretend it's beyond the realm of possibility that he threatened these people in this case? How fucking dishonest can you get.
0 likes
b gilley2020-10-10 20:49:39 (edited 2020-10-10 20:53:35 )
@Porkchop Periwinkle one, Drejka was shoved from the side, not from behind. Two you can't provide any law whatsoever that makes it illegal to shove someone away from yourself or your family if they are threatening them and you genuinely perceive them to be a danger to yourself and/or your family due to their threats. Three, no matter how you try to deflect and pass blame, even if this shove was an assault, it didn't give Drejka the right to then shoot the victim, because there was no further physical force used by the victim, and he was literally retreating when shot. You act like you care so much about the law, yet you can't even process the fact that this wasn't a justified shooting, even with stark video evidence, and a guilty verdict.
@Porkchop Periwinkle The deceased pushing Drejka is indeed an excessive response as long as Drejka wasn't threatening the victim, which indeed we don't know and would have a decent chance on landing the victim an assault case depending on the circumstances (Depends typically on the state laws, police & how hurt Drejka would have gotten if he had fallen to the ground). This however doesn't mean the shooting from Drejka wasn't an excessive response either and therefore excessive self-defence. A counter response can also be excessive and since lethal force weighs far heavier than non-lethal force the victim would most likely be aquitted if he had survived the shooting since the jury would most likely not find him guilty. The fact that the victim pushed as you said "Drejka into combat"(although I'm personally of the opinion that simply pushing someone doesn't already constitute a fight) doesn't mean this gives Drejka a free card to push the situation into deadly combat. So even though you argue that the victim is also in the wrong this doesn't negate that Drejka is guilty. This would only be applicable on the length of his sentence, not whether he'd get a sentence.
@Lily Ka's Vegan garden, Completely agree with you, I’m very happy this dude ended up in jail. But I do think it was wrong that the father shoved this guy. He could of confronted him in a verbal manner and not a physical one. But that does not mean this dude should of shot his aggressor. Especially since he backed up as soon as he pulled out his gun.
He absolutely infuriated me, especially with the part where he said "a man's life has been taken, don't take another man's life away", maybe no lives would be fucked if Michael minded his own business or EVEN BETTER hadn't killed the poor guy!!! now he needs to pay for his actions
I dont get why a jury of average people get to make these decisions, there are so many people convinced by stupid defense like that. Its basically giving regular schmucks to be manipulated when a judge can make an informed opinion.
@Porkchop Periwinkle Like I said in my previous comment. It doesn't matter that Drejka was pushed from behind. Like a normal person he should have assumed from the start that the other person was unarmed unless he had found reasonable counter observations that the guy was armed. As long as there's no indication that someone is armed you should assume the person won't use lethal force against you. And the guy wasn't even in punching range from him when Drejka finally shot. Drejak should first have assessed the situation before shooting, which he either negligently or deliberately didn't do. Either of which would lend him a guilty verdict since his gross negligence would still lend him a damning case. You can say "oh but it was in the spur of a heated moment" but you lose your freedom of acting in the spur of the moment the moment you bought your gun since that's the moment you became obligated to not recklessly use your firearm.
@Crusader1089 I don't think he was arguing that the drejka should've aimed for a non-lethal area, he was saying that the shot was perfect, which would be much harder to do and less likely to happen if he truly thought his life was in immediate danger and was injured like he claimed.
@KowalSky nah he said he landed on that arm, and "hurt" his wrist because the gun was in his pants and when he fell his wrist was between the gun and the concrete
@B Sheppard lol, i thought he was given it by the cops. you can see him push himself off the floor to get up with that arm, yet he has his own made up sling. I hope this was used in court to demostrate his ability of deception.
I sprained my wrist at work, I couldn't even pick up a shopping bag. I would grimace every time I inadvertently grabbed something heavy
@KowalSky that’s why he’s retired, I think He’s being a baby about his arm cuz the guy who got shot rocked his world before being shot so he probably fell on it pretty hard
@Robin C oh my goodness of course he deserved to be pushed Im just saying yes he didn’t need to go that extent to put his arm in his shirt and be dramatic about it and be so calm about everything but he did get his shit rocked and probably fell on it pretty hard I’m glad he got that push in before what happened...I wish he could’ve done more and I wish people aren’t so fucked to just pull a gun out on a man and shoot him over something so unnecessary it’s absolutely terrible I feel so much and I send all my love to his family and to the people who loved him dearly and he did not deserve what happened to him
This guy wanted to get into a confrontation and wanted to shoot someone. I would guess that he routinely fantasized about it. He didn't want to go to prison though. A person like this sees a "stand your ground" law as a way to kill someone and get away with it. He set up the entire series of events and made it happen. Maybe he didn't know exactly when it would happen or who he would kill. But he was wandering the neighborhood accosting people while carrying a gun. He was getting a little thrill from being able to act like he owned the town, and waiting for a chance to kill.
That is not how stand your ground laws work. Stand your ground laws allow an individual to use lethal force in very select circumstances such as a forcible criminal sexual assault, a homicide, a forcible rape, a burglary, a kidnapping, or a robbery. Outside of those specific circumstances an individual is REQUIRED to withdraw from the situation and communicate that they have withdrawn as long as they are able to unless the individual is in their own home. This is the difference between a stand your ground law and castle doctrine. Castle doctrine makes it so that an individual does not have to retreat from their own home if they believe that their life is in danger from a third party.
Vapid Toast I remember an old boy in the close I grew up in called old George. He was a pilot of a Lancaster bomber. But he was like that and used to chase us for being cheeky.
@KR Standridge I never once said that McGlockton should have been shot. The purpose of my comment was to show that a stand your ground law is not a way to get away with killing someone because it doesn't apply in the vast majority of cases.
@Alexander Carder who was more damaging? The person using words to talk about the parking spot....or the dude who ran up to someone and pushed them on the ground? Mouth breather
If they hadn't taken a handicapped spot or the victim hadn't assaulted the shooter, none of this would have happened. Shooting the assailant at that distance after the assault ended looks unnecessary though.
@S Fooshy The deceased impulsively knocked Drejka to the ground without warning. The "wife" was in the car behind a closed door. The unstable Drejka was triggered and we know the result. A verbal argument with Drejka would likely not have been fatal but the deceased upped the ante by turning things physical.
My husband and I once parked at a stork/family parking 2 weeks after my c-section while my son was still in the NICU. I was just going to pick up some items from the store for him. A woman and her husband saw me going back to the car (my husband was still inside paying for stuff. I had to go in the car first cause I was starting to feel uncomfortable) and this woman and her husband starting yelling at me because I neither looked pregnant nor did they see a baby. Wouldn’t even let me explain, I was on the verge of passing out and had to sit down and they wouldn’t let me in the car. They tried to call the cops until I a worker came up to me with my husband and argued with them. They wouldn’t leave until the store employee threatened to call the cops on them.
I'm so sorry that happened to you, I know if it were me, I'd be so emotional about that confrontation. (Embarrassed, angry, physical pain) I've had three. Sounds like you have a good man that stood up for you though! They should have felt like jerks and apologized. I've had 3 c sections, they are tough, major abdominal surgery!
@Nic B Nope, you do not need a permit to park in stork/parenting parking. Disabled parking =/= parenting parking, in any way. You fail both at reading and at knowing what you're talking about.
yeah this woman and her husband don’t have any right talking to you and you don’t owe them any explanation. just because you don’t look pregnant doesn’t mean you don’t reserve the right to use that parking spot. a perfect example of you haven no idea what kinda shit someone else is going through just by looking at them. i’m sorry you went through that.. i don’t know why they wouldn’t let you in the car, either, it seems ridiculous that they’re simultaneously telling you to get out of the parking spot, but also blocking your way to the car??????
@Nic B meh, people come up to folks with legitimate handicap placards and yell at them if they don’t look disabled enough.
Signed,
A person with a dad who had his first heart attack at age 48 and definitely would have died from it had he not been in the hospital already when he had it, who (due to his surgery and now compromised heart function) now needs a handicap placard. I distinctly recall one time where my dad parked in a handicap spot as normal, and proceeded to walk with the rest of us who were all in the car to the restaurant for dinner. My dad’s handicap is not immediately visible. Hence, one entitled couple decided to tell us off for parking there when we clearly didn’t need it. We shot back at them with “He’s had heart surgery. We can have him lift up his shirt to prove it to you.”
Luckily that shut them up but some aren’t so lucky.
@Nic B you sure seem to care about random people’s stories when you think you know better and can “educate” people on the law or whatever the hell it is you’re trying to do. But then when someone else brings along another story that talks about people acting like how you just did (inappropriately telling people where they can or cannot park based on perceived eligibility), you suddenly don’t care.
@Nic B you can comment but not when you then go and say “I don’t care about rando internet person stories” after just criticizing a rando internet person’s actions in their rando internet person’s story. 😉
@Nic B you cared enough to tell her she was wrong to park there. When in actuality, you have zero clue if that’s true. Where I live, stork parking permits aren’t a thing. They’re on the honor system. And new mothers who are still recovering from a c section can certainly park there sans baby. No cop is gonna come and arrest somebody for parking there because it isn’t illegal to do so under any circumstances where I live. Maybe the OP also lives in a place like that.
So, yes, your opinion on the rightness or wrongness of the OP’s actions is literally your perception, even by your own definition of how perception works. Because you don’t have the whole story or all of the answers.
@Nic B You kinda missed the part where she was literally recovering from a C Section, and was physically weak. I guarantee that baby parking, or whatever the fuck it’s called is specifically for new mothers, baby or not; because as it turns out, childbirth is an extremely painful and draining experience, more so if they have to use surgery to get the baby out.
Also, if it’s in America, I guarantee there was no permit required like a handicap placard. Literally everything other than handicap parking is usually just done by the store, and goes off the honor system that someone wouldn’t lie about needing a space closer to the store. So, getting mad because some internet stranger took a parking spot that they needed, that wasn’t against the law, is kinda… pointless. It’s not like her story is going to embolden people to park in the pram parking or whatever because they hate new mothers.
But I’m sure you know that, and are just trolling in the most obtuse and circular way possible. That’s at least what it seems like, and you’re not even good at it, because you just keep repeating the same dumb shit over and over.
@Dornpunzel Be careful before you do something stupid that you will regret. You become the guy who escalates minor inconveniences into shouting matches or even physical violence and still thinks he is in the right.
@Nic B it’s pretty rich you telling someone to get off their high horse when you’ve legit been acting like stork/family parking is the most important thing in the world. As far as I’m concerned, if a permit isn’t required to park there, it’s a free spot. There’s legit zero legal requirement to park there. It’s a courtesy spot only. There has never been a permit, requirement, nor fine for parking in stork/family parking and never will. Wanna know why, because it’s literally considered a courtesy spot by the companies that place them there. However there’s no legal standing or authoritative body that can tell you to move or punish you for using it. It’s the same idea as the larger toilet stall for older or handicapped people, ideally you shouldn’t use it if you have another option, but no one can prevent you, fine you, or detain you from using it as it is only a courtesy. It’s absurd to judge a new mother for using the spot especially when there’s no one vying for it or in need of it in that moment.
@Nic B “Mothers recovering from c section shouldn’t be driving” Who said OP was? Would I be annoyed? Maybe, but more than likely, I’d hardly be paying attention and policing whether or not someone actually needs to be parking there. Definitely would never dream of directly confronting them.
@Nic B OP was likely in a grey area where she was fit to leave her house, but wasn’t driving and still was very much recovering from major surgery. People don’t just suddenly cease to have needs to go out shopping for stuff while recovering.
Also as someone else pointed out to you, stork parking isn’t like a legally regulated thing like handicap parking. So…it really is just a parking spot with a fancy sign. It is not legally enforceable to get someone to move from there. You should be wondering why the confronters of the OP were threatening to call the cops lol.
@Vitorruy1 I know what you mean, buddy. This is why i ALWAYS kept calm and silent in tense situations in real life. Even tho sometimes i felt like regretting this since i was upset afterwards for months and asked myself why i let other people shout at me for no reason.
@PianoDisneygal10 Absolutely not of course. As mentioned: He had the right to pull his gun to defend himself but pulling the trigger showed that he not fired because of self defense but more out of being angry/mad or tired of being pushed around. I guess both did wrong and paid the price.
@Nic B never said that you said that. But you’re acting like it is, because you basically sided with the people that were confronting the OP. Anyways, I can tell you just want to be argumentative, and this is exhausting. I’ll let you have the final word if you wish.
@Nic B why do stork people get a special place to park? They are the ones that got to have the fun. Now I have to listen to their screaming monsters when I go shopping 3 years later. I park sideways in stork spots
@Nic B So, why did you, a commenter, as after watching a video, feel obliged to argue in the comment section for unrelated causes, with multiple assumptions, even though you clearly need not get out of anyone's way - the people who “yelled” at you obviously feel justified in questioning in other's experiences, understandably so from your own point of view, without considering the world is vastly different from whatever place you're from. It wouldn't hurt to use a period and get off your high horse.
I'm sure you deserved to get called out for not having anything to prove that you can use the parking lot, but yelling, blocking you from getting in the car, and attempting to call the cops... That's just harassment.
@Nic B There's a reason why Nic B commented to the OP like they did, and by the looks of it they certainly realize who/what they are. 17 days.....17 days of them acting like a keyboard warrior. love it
@Nic B Do you have nothing better to do than get up in arms over a youtube comment? Scrolling through and seeing how many times you’ve replied makes me feel like you need to go touch some grass or something
I'm curious why people confront people over this. Just take a cell photo and turn it in. Confronting people will only lead to escalation. So don't be surprised if someone delivers you several ham sandwiches.
@Nic B his staring does not make sense. Why should he care or anyone for that matter? What does he have to gain but waste my time? Point is people need to mind their business. Period.
5 likes
Mr. Duane Sharpe2021-12-28 22:10:39 (edited 2021-12-29 00:26:08 )
@Nic B what reality is, is that I can’t stop someone from staring, looking as reality is I can’t control people obviously . The difference between myself and that person (for all intensive purpose) who stared, got upset for no reason is the point. I wouldn’t. Reality is some people put themselves into a precarious situation and instigate it when they don’t need to. Staring or recording fine but to further escalate from a position of being passive on up is what I’m talking about. There’s a thing called “ownage” where some people think that they own people they come into contact with, with words and gestures and also directive(s).
You don’t know someone from atom. You don’t know what the are holding, if he or she is crazy etc. and yet and still force your way into their life disingenuously. That’s a no. I can record someone as well as you can, (as I assume you did a background check on me) but if I were to go into their AO, as I don’t care what does that make me!? If I walked pass someone’s car (and I am disabled) and I don’t see a placard (mind you I don’t care) I don’t have dog in the fight. Now I have confronted someone for parking in a disabled spot why? Because I needed to park and because that affected me. There’s a difference.
@Nic B you’re right. I could have could have been passive but I’m not. I detest when people stare for instance and not nod or say hi or hello or how are you. That’s rude. Going back to the guy, he was pacing and staring. There’s more to this story though but I just gave you a glimpse.
Story in short. He stares and looks all over the front of the car. As you mentioned and we know why. Searching half desperately for a placard. He goes inside the building and complains. Setting off a chain reaction to others. Comes back outside and does the same thing. I pull the window down and ask “the heck are you looking at..” he asks about the placard and I ask “have you checked the back of the car?” He does and his suspicion is now quelled. Meanwhile the people inside who heard his complain started to wonder as they know him and probably trust him. They become suspicious about me and wonder. We are outside talking about misunderstandings while the manager inside become upset because no one quelled his suspicions based on the guy’s complaint. The guy leaves and I go inside and was confronted (chain reaction). The manager and I talk about it and once again I had to quell his suspicions. We talk and talk until my wife shows up, saying she was worried because our daughters’ class was over 10 minutes ago. The teacher called. Distracted, my phone was left in the car talking to a complete and utter stranger. While talking to the manager I could see my daughter dancing and playing and thought nothing of it. Was harmless. My wife saw on the news that there was a car accident and was worried that we could have been in it. She was relieved when she saw me.
Now. Do you see how one person being a somewhat parking vigilante could cause a chain reaction for so many people. A complete stranger who I will never see again probably and serve 0 purpose in my life affected at least myself + 6 other people in a manner of 20 minutes and for what? What was the outcome to his query? Why? What purpose did it serve? But to relinquish his own “personal” insecurities and or past about people parking in a handicap space with a placard not showing? When he couldn’t take the time as the video showed to look around the entire car? What then? Would he still complain after seeing plates that it wasn’t warranted or still complain that or as you put it “supposed to be hung from the mirror so that it can be seen fore and aft”.
Tell me what was the end goal. You see it was a selfish move by that guy and I will never know the back story to it. Meaning, there must have been a past story as to the ultimate “trigger”.
Referring to inviting potential confrontation is actually being the antagonist. The guy was. Scenario: he could have just walked past the car and went home. Or: (his actions) created an inescapable situation where a person has to be involved. What if he called the police? Invited you say to this confrontational party, sorry my guy. That was something I preferred to stay away from but I will oblige rude and disrespectful people and THAT I do not need an invitation for. I’m buying drinks for that party/roast/confrontation. Make excuses for him all you want. The point is and will every be. Mind yo damn business. (Unless there is a direct threat to self and others) otherwise he wa just a male Karen. Hopeless and alone, not a single life and probably full of disparity. Wanting, thriving the need to feel important and heard. To be seen as some people stay hidden from others. Knowing that time is against him in life. Some sad shit after you deconstruct it. Thoughts?
@Nic B also also. You don’t have to know someone to read them to tell and possibly predict their future outcome(s). Live life long enough to gain a 3rd/4th eye based off of countless unbiased experiences with various people. The point is mastering to “read” people. Body language, response, eye contact, mannerisms, etc. etc. etc. good talk though.
@Nic B thank you for that also. I’m an intellect and I indulge in adult conversations. Thank you for being persistent and articulate. There are many people especially on YT that are quick to insult, shame etc. and do not possess or can construct a simple dialect but feel the need to be right based on their own opinion(s) and not the views of others: especially to things/situations that he or she has no direct impact in. Not. A. Dog. In. The. Fight as you will. I appreciate the back and forth sir!
@Nic B It's always hilarious when a narcissist tells other people to get of their high horse. Just let the woman park wherever she wants, if she is close to passing out. If you disagree you're nothing but a psychopath. Get lost.
I'm so sorry. I have a disability that affects my mobility on different days. I have a disability placard and just because I can walk on some days I've been accused of having a fake placard and had the cops called on me.
Because they dont want their country to be like nicaragua. and when you come live among them you live by their rules and not bring your 3rd world lawlessness
@Racmaster00 You know what's cringeworthy? Trying to shut down a conversation with the words "OK Karen". Instantly makes you look like an edgy 14 year old, regardless of whether or not you're in the right.
I’m sorry to hear you went through this. Healing after a c section is very painful and I got lightheaded and tired easily for a month afterwards. I hope your son is healthy.
I think people that make a big deal out of someone using disabled parking are deep down really just jealous they don’t get to use it. Otherwise why do they care so much. I doubt they are just concerned for all the “real “ disabled people. What I see most of the time is all the disabled parking is left empty at the front of the store and no one is using it so it’s just going to waste.
@Nic B I’m sorry I didn’t read every single one of your comments, sheesh. Also, we only received the perspective of the OP. Based on her explanation, which isn’t very complicated. It’s clear that the stork parking was permit based (and literally none of them are because it would be 100% pointless to do so, furthermore, they’re put there by the companies, not mandated by legislation). My point is I don’t see why you’re arguing against the OP in the first place. What she did isn’t illegal, or even unethical, it seems like you just wanted to argue for the basis of arguing only as there isn’t a resolution. You say you’ve been alluding to what I said, but you did it in such a roundabout and obtuse way. If that’s what you meant then just say it.
I don't know why such people have to appoint themselves as law monitors like the community needs their services. Hopefully you and your family are well and have recovered from this.
@Nic B So to you "stork / family parking" is the same as parking for disabled ?? Then I guess in that parking lot there were no spots marked for disabled, as they would be the "stork / family parking" ones, right ?
People like this exist because if we tell people that they can harass other citizens - even preventing someone from entering their car like in your case - and nobody is allowed to even touch them while they do the harassing - a lot of wannabe alpha, frustrated losers will be very happy to jump on that opportunity.
Your case is quite different from the video though.
Obviously the shooter is a coward who first engages because he only sees a woman and children, and then draws the classic coward's preferred weapon - a gun, meant to hit from a distance - as soon as he receives one push even though the other guy was not following it up and instead was getting farther. This is voluntary homicide to me, there is no way the shooter had valid reasons to think his life was in danger if he didn't shoot.
But the victim was not blameless like you were. For starters they had chosen to park in a space reserved for handicapped persons despite there being other spots available right there. Big red flag. Plus he pushed the guy while the guy was not looking - not a very manly approach - and while the guy was just talking. This is very different from a woman who had a C-section 2 weeks earlier and needs to sit in her car as she is on the verge of passing out.
@Nic B So you are admitting that this "Nic B" personality you display here in the comments of a youtube video does not even exist. You are pretending just to start pointless discussions with random people on the inernet. Maybe you should go out to a barber - there you have someone to talk to in real life.
Revelation 20 And I saw an angel coming down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit, and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon the old serpent, which is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.
3 And he cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should no more seduce the nations, till the thousand years be finished. And after that, he must be loosed a little time.
4 And I saw seats; and they sat upon them; and judgment was given unto them; and the souls of them that were beheaded for the testimony of Lord God Jesus, and for the word of Lord God, and who had not adored the beast nor his image, nor received his character on their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Lord God Christ a thousand years.
5 The rest of the dead lived not, till the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection. In these the second death hath no power; but they shall be priests of Lord God and of Lord God Christ; and shall reign with him a thousand years.
7 And when the thousand years shall be finished, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and shall go forth, and seduce the nations, which are over the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, and shall gather them together to battle, the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.
8 And they came upon the breadth of the earth, and encompassed the camp of the saints, and the beloved city.
9 And there came down fire from Lord God out of heaven, and devoured them; and the devil, who seduced them, was cast into the pool of fire and brimstone, where both the beast
10 And the false prophet shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
11 And I saw a great white throne, and one sitting upon it, from whose face the earth and heaven fled away, and there was no place found for them.
12 And I saw the dead, great and small, standing in the presence of the throne, and the books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged by those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and hell gave up their dead that were in them; and they were judged every one according to their works.
14 And hell and death were cast into the pool of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life, was cast into the pool of fire.
@Young minds podcast anyone who draws a weapon on someone after being pushed, said person who pushed you backed off and then you still choose to fire then you are in fact a bad guy who deserves to be off the street because you are a threat to people around you.
“He’s not a bad guy” Did you turn your ears off at 36:40 were it’s proven he pulled a gun on 4 other people AND he was the antagonists in those situations?!
@Young minds podcast Bro, this guy was a public menance this was the 5 recorded incident of him pulling a gun out on someone 2 of the previous people were unarmed women. I think he's been dying for an excuse to shoot someone for a long time and he finaly put himself in a situation where he thought he'd get away with it.
The guy who he shot wasn’t even the one who parked there! He was literally a concerned father/ husband who saw a man extremely close to his family and shoved him away. So all this “ to be fair he was parked in the handicapped parking spot“ is bullshit
@HanZ Bananz plus she was in the vehicle and could have moved the car or got her man to do it. It's not the end of the world, an inconvenience but not life ending worthy.
Vagabond_Charlie the “physical assault” was being lightly pushed over because he was getting too close to his wife and yelling at her. Not a reason to shoot someone at all
Marelody ... No. because there were plenty empty spots closer to the door. The guy was a wannabe enforcer. Not to mention with a disability sticker you can park on roof of a house and no one will ticket you. While it's true ppl are assholes for taking up those spaces it did not prevent anyone from accessibility.
@HanZ Bananz "extremely close", she was in a car, she basically could just drive away lol. This is the situation of a crazy gun freak, a probable Karen and an aggressive man having a dispute together. Karen escalates a dispute , aggressive man becomes violent and crazy cold blooded gun freak has been waiting on a moment to pull a trigger and kill someone..
@el not a reason definitely, but it is not lightly being pushed, this is really lightly being pushed and look what consequences it can have if you happen to fall on your head https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR5tIELdM-g. It was undeniably an aggressive move to go there and push him over immediately. He didn't had to get shot for it which was unnecessary and over exaggerated in the situation but the victim was far from an innocent father, he resolved immediately to violence.
@Tom Anderson gun laws are much tighter than that. At least in larger cities. Like Chicago, and see how well gun laws work there. The real problem is this “see something say something” mentality we have developed since 9/11. This guy didn’t need to start shit over a parking spot. It was a convenience store, every single spot at the store is closer to the door than the handicapped spots you find at Walmart.
this is gold. I witnessed some lady get hit while jaywalking. The driver called the cops driver was off the hook and she was hit with a ticket for jaywalking and a big Hospital Bill.
@Tom Anderson In US you have to be 18 to have a gun, but you can own a car at 16. So your murders will have to be vehicular manslaughter for a couple years before you can get a gun. This guy's permit should've been revoked due to the previous incidents. I'm not sure the process to revoke an owner's permit.
@Lukkaboc You can buy yourself a gun before you can buy a pint, lol. Why do people even NEED guns anyway? I certainly get along fine without. As does much of the developed world's population
@Tom Anderson no, that's not accurate. In many states you have to be 21 unless it's with a hunting license or as a member of law enforcement, like my state of Florida, where even for longarms one must be 21 unless their a member of law enforcement or military service.
@el ehhhhh is a verbal argument really enough of a reason to shove that man to the ground like that? They all made poor choices and they all have to deal with the consequences that's life. The only victims are the children its really that simple I don't feel sorry for any of them.
@Tom Anderson bud you have to be 21 to have a handgun first off... Secondly you don't see 16 year old's walking around with shotguns and rifles in 99% of the country. People like you believe the media the same media that wants guns banned and that's the only problem America has. We have so much corrupt media and biased media and it doesn't help that liberals own social media.... Sorry bud but I've never heard gunshots outside at night meanwhile most people around me have firearms. Most of these shootings take place in areas with laws that prevent law abiding citizens from defending themselves. Heck most of these mass shootings are really just gang related shootings but saying we have thousands of mass shootings a year sounds better especially when you can try and associate mass shootings with straight white men which happen to be the enemy in this country right now.
Eventually things will change and social media sites etc will get proper regulations that they deserve that away they cant keep pedaling BS while claiming fake news and linking CNN as the source I mean really.... How bias do you have to be to call a tweet fake news and then use a CNN article as a legitimate unbias source not some bias media company.
@Taco King it was justified, video evidence showed exactly what happened, he got pushed fell to the ground black father didn't go charging at him to pummel him while on the ground after he pushed, him guy pulled gun black father proceeded to back up and he fired anyways. He got charged and convicted cause what he did was wrong. You can boohoo about it all day doesn't change the fact he got punished rightly for his actions
@HanZ Bananz havent read the whole chain yett, but to be fair, he wasn't "extremely close" to his family. as the man walked up he was more than an armslength from the vehicle, SHE got out, removing the door as a defense, the drive away option, and closing the distance, so the shove was not justified. The shot was also NOT justified and I support the verdict.
@Properly Gaming to be fair, the man did approach him after he went down, it was after he noticed his hand that he started to back away. The shove wasn't justified, the draw WAS 100% justified, the SHOT was not justified, and I fully support the verdict. Had he fired several shots I would have supported a second degree verdict.
@75ur15 I meant he wasn't charging in to start pummeling the man whilst he was on the ground. He took a step forward and looked like he was asking him something. Probably "why the fuck are you berating my wife"
Why is nobody mentioning the fact that the victim parked in a handicap spot? Listen, I'm not justifying him being shot but I hate arrogant people who just think they can do anything they want - with an "IDGAF" attitude, such as parking in a disabled parking spot when they're not disabled. These types of people are scumbags. He did not deserve to be shot over this but unfortunately, he crossed somebody who was a little more arrogant than him that day and paid the consequences. Sorry but both the suspect and the victim can kiss my *
Revelation 17 And there came one of the seven angels, who had the seven vials, and spoke with me, saying: Come, I will shew thee the condemnation of the great harlot, who sitteth upon many waters,
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication; and they who inhabit the earth, have been made drunk with the wine of her whoredom.
3 And he took me away in spirit into the desert. And I saw a woman sitting upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
4 And the woman was clothed round about with purple and scarlet, and gilt with gold, and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand, full of the abomination and filthiness of her fornication.
5 And on her forehead a name was written: A mystery; Babylon the great, the mother of the fornications, and the abominations of the earth.
6 And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Lord God Jesus. And I wondered, when I had seen her, with great admiration.
7 And the angel said to me: Why dost thou wonder? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast which carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
8 The beast, which thou sawest, was, and is not, and shall come up out of the bottomless pit, and go into destruction: and the inhabitants on the earth (whose names are not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world) shall wonder, seeing the beast that was, and is not.
9 And here is the understanding that hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, upon which the woman sitteth, and they are seven kings:
10 Five are fallen, one is, and the other is not yet come: and when he is come, he must remain a short time.
11 And the beast which was, and is not: the same also is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into destruction.
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest, are ten kings, who have not yet received a kingdom, but shall receive power as kings one hour after the beast.
13 These have one design: and their strength and power they shall deliver to the beast.
14 These shall fight with the Lord God Lamb, and the Lord God Lamb shall overcome them, because he is Lord of lords, and King of kings, and they that are with him are called, and elect, and faithful.
15 And he said to me: The waters which thou sawest, where the harlot sitteth, are peoples, and nations, and tongues.
16 And the ten horns which thou sawest in the beast: these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her with fire.
17 For Lord God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of Lord God be fulfilled.
18 And the woman which thou sawest, is the great city, which hath kingdom over the kings of the earth.
It really irritates me when someone parks in a handicapped spot without the plates or placard. But the worst I would do is shake my head at them. I believe karma will do the rest, I'm not spending possibly the rest of my life in prison over a dang parking spot.
I just don't think redoing the scenario was at the forefront of his mind, even if he did say he would've done things differently we probably wouldn't have believed him lol
It's classic 2nd degree murder it was his emotions that caused this the guy was unarmed.It went from him able to file charges of assult against him to being a murder and he stated in interview he don't know his face just that he was black and when he shot he didn't see his hands or face just his hip twitch he got manslaughter that's the Justus system.
@Yotsuba Space and Music that's something cause he will be 80 when he gets out.2 lives lost except one is still breathing if he would have checked his emotions before shooting he would still be free.
@Yotsuba Space and Music yea listen to him say 48 when they ask his age during interview.Manslaughter has a max sentence of 15 years and 15 probation.So if they hit him with 20 and manslaughter how many more years is that could be another 15 years on top of 20.
@Yotsuba Space and Music the difference between an interview and an interrogation is an interview your not under arrest and is willfully talking to police an interrogation is gathering information on a person who is detained/arrested.
This shit is fucked, not only did this man kill someone who didn't have the intention of harm but to protect his wife and children, but he was then shot, most likely of the victims ethnic group. The victim did not try to harm the murder after he was shoved, but instead as cameras shown started talking to him, to figure what the case of dramatization.
i understand that the husband pushed his murderer because he heard his wife screaming at him and thought he was about to attack him, I understand that you would get confrontational after getting pushed by arguing or maybe even pushing back, but to bring out your gun as soon as you're down from a shove, watch him back up and try to get away as you proceed to shoot him and claim he was coming towards you and then try and act like a hero while using military 'lingo without being in the military is kinda pathetic, this guy really thought he was the law, but guess what? he wasn't..he was just trigger happy and foolish.
@Ding Dong The man was defending his WIFE, if I saw a random person yelling at my partner, while my kids were in the car I would react the same way. Does parking illegally mean you deserve to get shot wtf? Also what does that have to do with Floyd? This is a completely different situation, and his death was unjust as well. If your racist just say that smh
@Ding Dong some real smooth brain thinking. How does it feel to mix so many unrelated things together and feel like it's smart enough to share with the public.
Love how he starts backing up AND THEN the guy shoots. I don't really get pulling out the gun, but at the very least, shooting it? Very sad the children were there as well.
@Ding Dong he heard his wife yelling and assumed some shit was going down, of course he'd shove the guy, he randomly came up to her to argue (even if she wasn't in the right), and the floyd case has nothing to do with this.
@Foshy Urgason very sad that he said he never got into a fight, claimed he was prepared to fight, and when there was almost a fight he shot the guy down and never regretted it.
@Milo Spivak No, but physically attacking someone you don't know might get you killed as it happened here. He might have been a pro boxer and punch him to dead instead of a gun. It was a purely verbal altercation until he attacked.
@Gucci Couture So are you saying that you would violently push someone to the street like that if he was arguing with your wife? I sure as hell wouldn't. I would go and ask what his problem is. You realize that if the shooter would have slammed his head on the asfalt when pushed, he might be dead now? The physical attack was completely uncalled for and dumb.
@Baddy Pleash Because he might get physically attacked at the parking lot perhaps? He was carrying that gun for decades and nothing happened as long as nobody started pushing him to the ground. Yes, it was totally wrong that he shot but then again it wouldn't have happened without the push. Both were at fault.
@Jon Carl The Floyd case has a striking similarity in the sense that both would now be alive if they acted civil. Start violence, bad things tend to happen.
@Ding Dong you know that feeling when you lean too far back in your chair and almost fall back, but catch yourself at the last minute? I feel like that all the time.
@Ding Dong Like I said he saw a stranger yelling at his wife, who could've been armed (in which he was) even witnesses stated that they heard violent yelling, the man came to out the store, saw what was happening and reacted. I would say he even saw him as a threat, a threat to his family, and sadly he was because now they lost a father and a husband
@Ding Dong ok but going up to someone's car and yelling might get you killed so what's your point exactly. The mf had a gun what would you say if he shot the wife or even the kids? did you even watch the video at all? everything you're saying has already been addressed in it.
@Ding Dong And last thing, since you're so hooked on the pushing thing, maybe people shouldn't start yelling at others because they might get "pushed to hard"🙄
@Ding Dong Ok, first of all, the guy heard the old bastard arguing with his wife and thought she was in immediate danger, his kids were in the car and the old guy was escalating things. The old guy said "I never got into a fight, even in school!" but said "I was prepared to fight if it had to come to it!", well, when that man who was defending his family shoved the bastard, what did he do? did he start getting physical? No, he immediately unholstered his gun while the father/husband started backing up and got shot, then the bastard claimed that his victim was running towards him, your name is pretty accurate so far, which is the only fact you have that is currently accurate.
@Gucci Couture I would not start pushing or striking him, I would calmly ask what his problem is. Only if he poses a physical threat, I would even touch him. Complaining about a parking spot is not a physical threat.
@Gucci Couture He had no justification to push the man. He started the violence and made this poorly judged man decide that he had to defend his face by shooting him. It would neve have happened unless he pushed him.
@Jon Carl What was his justification for shoving the man? Nothing. The man was yelling and being aggravated by the loud mouthed wife in the car apparently (judging from how the discussion heated very quickly). He could have gone there and talked to the man politely and the situation would have dissolved. But no, he chose to act like a macho hothead and attacked the guy. And paid the ultimate price for his bad choice.
@Ding Dong So you're saying it's justified to shoot down an unarmed man who was already about to back off as soon as he saw the gun come out? the guys kids were there and his wife was yelling at the guy not as if it was a petty squable but as if it was a big deal, while yes it was illegal that she parked there and yes it was wrong of him to shove the guy. it's understandable as to why he'd do it, his motives were his wife and kid and he thought the guy was crazy, you're just saying it's the fault of the man and woman (it's their fault for parking there, and while yes he could have reacted differently it doesn't mean he should get shot down while unarmed and EVEN TURNING BACK AS TO GET AWAY FROM THE GUN TOTING IDIOT), the man could have handled that better, he's at fault for shooting down a father and husband who was assuming the guy was crazy, if the father shot down the guy i'd say the father was at fault for shooting the guy down, if the wife shot him down i'd say she's at fault for shooting him down in an argument, but it was a petty argument that turned physical due to a misunderstanding, then turned into a murder charge because the guy was trigger happy and KNEW the father was running away from him.
@Ding Dong this was never a game of comparison. You commented what you did though, and it was just a sad that that’s how you took this story. You could be an intelligent man/woman that lacks empathy, compassion, and the concern for lives. I can give a fuck less if you’re smarter than I am, ding dong. Have a wonderful day & be safe out there. 👍🏼
@Jon Carl If you read my replies I have repeatedly said I don't justify the shooting in any way. I'm just saying that the victim caused the situation to escalate to the point it did by physically attacking the shooter, for no reason expect than showing off what a big man he was. If he would have acted in a civilized manner, only thing that would have been shot would be a couple of f-bombs and they drive away.
Exactly, that long pause before he shot have it away. He was having a bad day. I get pissed with people parking in handicap spaces as well but if I confront some one about I know what I'm getting myself into. I can throw hands so I'm not relying on a weapon in case it goes south. That was his intentions from the start. If the lady would have gotten out he would of did the same. Too my black brethren out there we got to start playing smart because we play by Men rules and some people play by being cowards. I have a best friend who will always run in a fight but would never pull a weapon. That being said if the dude never laid hands on him he would be alive. Stay calm and walk away people ain't worth the trouble.
@Ding Dong By your logic, the subject of this video should’ve been minding his own business and not gotten confrontational over someone else’s parking – and therefore got entirely what was coming.
@Cobra McJingleballs A citizen is well within his rights to comment when someone is violating either the law or moral standards. He did not physically assault anyone until being assaulted upon.
@Ding Dong can tell who wrote this is a white male. Why bring Floyd into this? This video has nothing to do with Floyd. Sounds like “if you follow the law nothing will happen to you”
Pushing someone because there is yelling is also illegal. If he has fallen so that his head had hit the ground and it could have resulted in serious injury (or death in a extreme case) so it would also have caused a court case. It’s far less likely that pushing causes death than gun causing death. But it’s still not legally justified for you to push people over them yelling, it’s just usually don’t cause any serious injuries so it won’t cause followup. But it’s not what you should do in either legal standpoint or practical like here where the guy had a gun and thought it was fine to kill the person who pushed him.
Ding Dong Exactly right. People saying here that he didn’t deserve death. Obviously! The thing is every action has consequences. The victim chose to get aggressive and physically violent. He committed assault and got one-upped. The victim is not entirely blameless for the events that transpired. He would be alive today if he chose words.
@Ding Dong the dude pushing him didn’t die from the push . The dude who was oddly carrying a gun around is what killed him . Using ur logic ur contradicting urself LOL
@Deja Xyz Uhh Floyd violently resisted arrest which was the only reason he got put to the ground. He was already in the patrol car going by his merry way until he went crazy. Had he sat there he would now be alive and we'd avoid all the BS. Doing drugs and attacking the police is not just "a mistake". It has consequences.
@Deja Xyz "physical" matters. Words are words, when you push someone to the ground violently, it can potentially result to a serious injury or death. There are countless cases where people died from hitting their head to sharp objects (or hit by a passing car) after being pushed like that. Moreover that attack triggered the gun man to pull, which would most likely not have happened if only words were exchanged.
@YoMamas TheMailMan Learn to read please. I never claimed to do anything. I said that if you physically attack an unknown person, that person may respond with deadly force as happened in this case. You never know who you push, it might be a veeeery bad idea. Like the guy who got caught stealing Chuck Liddels truck lol.
@Xander Houston For the n:th time I'm not defending him I'm accusing the hothead for the initial physical attack that got him killed. Act civil, live. Simple.
@Olufunso Fawole He caused a physical confrontation with a man who had that far only yelled some words. He had no need to push him, he could have gone between the argument and told him to piss off and leave. But no, he chose violence and lost.
@Olufunso Fawole I'm pretty sure the wife was extremely rude to the man, which is why the verbal argument escalated in a few seconds. Had she said "oh sorry, we didn't realize" the whole argument would be over and the husband had no excuse to start pushing armed gunmen to the ground. They learned the thug life lesson the hard way.
@Olufunso Fawole Reading comprehension please. I said "judging from the speed of which the verbal argument heated up". If the wife would have given a civil answer, there would be no need for a heated argument. But I guess this concept is too hard to grasp for some. It's easier to close your eyes from facts and throw insults and accusations.
@Cauchy Schwarz I'm not saying he should have pushed him, I'm saying i understand his reasoning for it, a random guy yelling at his wife in front of his kids and he's unsure as to who the guy is, he shouldn't have pushed him but then again the guy who shot him shouldn't have shot him down, he claimed that he had known that it could have gotten physical and said "I was prepared for it to get physical" but then claimed "I've never gotten into a fight, even in school!" as a reason to why he was a good man.
@Jon Carl I understand both peoples reasoning and both were wrong in what they did. Of course the shooter was off a lot more.
I just read things from others things like "defending his family" and that is just absurd. A young man pushing an older person to the floor just because of a heated verbal argument is simply assault.
@Ding Dong if he had slammed his head. But that is not what happened. Maybe the husband over reacted with the shove, maybe not. I don't believe there was any audio in that clip. We have no idea of what was being said and at what volume. Too bad the guy didn't just mind his own damned business.
@Ding Dong Also would not have happened if the guy had minded his own business about the parking. He could have notified the store manager about the parking "problem". Pretty sure no one would have gotten killed.
@Sheryl Ferraro No, this whole thing started with them parking to a handicap spot. They and they only were the cause for the whole altercation. And in addition to parking bad, the husband got violent and dangerously pushed a man who was only commenting on them violating the rights of disabled people.
@Kristian LOL now that was a seriously mental thing to say. If you can't see how pushing a man to the ground could get you in trouble, how can you call me stupid?
I dont fully blame him for pulling the gun because the situation of being knocked to the floor from behind and having no clue what could be happening, but firing the gun was the dumbest shit.
This is exactly why people shouldn't attack strangers. You never know if it's a low self esteem maniac who just waits for an excuse to shoot or a cop with a bad day and a heavy knee.
1 Timothy 2 I desire therefore, first of all, that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all men:
2 For kings, and for all that are in high station: that we may lead a quiet and a peaceable life in all piety and holy chastity.
3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of Lord God our Saviour,
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth.
5 For there is one Lord God, and one mediator of Lord God and men, the man Lord God Christ Jesus:
6 Who gave himself a redemption for all, a testimony in due times.
7 Whereunto I am appointed a preacher and an apostle, (I say the truth, I lie not,) a doctor of the Gentiles in faith and truth.
8 I will therefore that men pray in every place, lifting up pure hands, without anger and contention.
9 In like manner women also in decent apparel: adorning themselves with modesty and sobriety, not with plaited hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly attire,
10 But as it becometh women professing godliness, with good works.
11 Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection.
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence.
13 For Adam was first formed; then Eve.
14 And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression.
15 Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in true faith, and holy love, and sanctification, with sobriety.
1 Timothy 5 An ancient man rebuke not, but entreat him as a father: young men, as brethren:
2 Old women, as mothers: young women, as sisters, in all holy chastity.
3 Honour widows, that are widows indeed.
4 But if any widow have children, or grandchildren, let her learn first to govern her own house, and to make a return of duty to her parents: for this is acceptable before Lord God.
5 But she that is a widow indeed, and desolate, let her trust in Lord God, and continue in supplications and prayers night and day.
6 For she that liveth in pleasures, is dead while she is living.
7 And this give in charge, that they may be blameless.
8 But if any man have not care of his own, and especially of those of his house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
9 Let a widow be chosen of no less than threescore years of age, who hath been the wife of one husband.
10 Having testimony for her good works, if she have brought up children, if she have received to harbour, if she have washed the saints' feet, if she have ministered to them that suffer tribulation, if she have diligently followed every good work.
11 But the younger widows avoid. For when they have grown rebellious in Lord God Christ, they will marry:
12 Having damnation, because they have made void their first faith.
13 And withal being idle they learn to go about from house to house: and are not only idle, but tattlers also, and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not.
14 I will therefore that the younger should marry, bear children, be mistresses of families, give no occasion to the adversary to speak evil.
15 For some are already turned aside after Satan.
16 If any of the faithful have widows, let him minister to them, and let not the church be charged: that there may be sufficient for them that are widows indeed.
17 Let the priests that rule well, be esteemed worthy of double honour: especially they who labour in the word and doctrine:
18 For the scripture saith: Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn: and, The labourer is worthy of his reward.
19 Against a priest receive not an accusation, but under two or three witnesses.
20 Them that sin reprove before all: that the rest also may have fear.
21 I charge thee before Lord God, and Lord God Christ Jesus, and the elect angels, that thou observe these things without prejudice, doing nothing by declining to either side.
22 Impose not hands lightly upon any man, neither be partaker of other men's sins. Keep thyself chaste.
23 Do not still drink water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake, and thy frequent infirmities.
24 Some men's sins are manifest, going before to judgment: and some men they follow after.
25 In like manner also good deeds are manifest: and they that are otherwise, cannot be hid.
I literally cannot fathom giving any sort of a fuck about someone parking in a handicap spot even if i WAS handicapped. You're not a cop or a security gaurd. Hell even if a cop saw that they weren't handicapped he would've just given them a ticket like its not that deep bruh
That's what I said. I know it bothers me to see someone taking up a handicap parking if they don't need it, or don't have a permit but I wouldn't go up to them and tell them to move. Thats just super stupid especially in this country where almost everyone has a gun and most people are crazy.
what if the white guy was legitimately handicapped and upset about people constantly violating the protocols? It is OK for the black guy to assault him and shove him to the ground?
@Jon BonBon The thing is that he shot himself in the leg when he said he wasn't worried about the reaction he could cause by doing this cause he carried a gun. In other words, he was just waiting for this opportunity to use it.
@Jon BonBon Guy thought the dude was gonna hurt his girlfriend, lmao. So he shoves him away. Doesn't justify lethal force. You can't use lethal force to get revenge, which is what this guy did. He could have just got up walked away, filed a police report for assault. But the guy backs up and starts turning when the gun is pulled out, threat is moving away, you lose your justification for lethal force.
I'm a hardcore gun rights supporter, and this was a bad kill. No matter how you spin it, who gives a fuck what he was upset about. you contact the relevant agency, report it, walk away and go home. You CANNOT use your firearm for revenge, cause you're mad.
@Blackhand Spectre You said there’s something to be said about the fine are of following the rules (laws). The courts found that Drejka did not follow the law (rules) in regards to when you can discharge a firearm. Maybe he should have minded his own business and not broke the rules too?
@Blackhand Spectre Lol he only claimed he thought he was gonna get stomped cause it looked better than what really happened. A coward who shot a man trying to walk away from him.
@Money Mix Machine yes, but how exactly was the African-American criminal supposed to KNOW that he wasn't handicapped from the brief visual assessment he arguably performed in the short amount of time between exiting the store and attacking him? (As if that makes a difference to him, my guess is he would have assaulted the man just for being white and having the audacity to speak up against his criminal conduct EVEN IF he was handicapped)
He simply couldn't have known that unless he had all the information that we have now. From his perspective, he's just assaulted someone who was potentially handicapped.
Hindsight is irrelevant.
Nothing but a sad future ahead in your life, going around with the mentality you have, bud!
2 likes
Donya Lewis2021-02-15 19:38:45 (edited 2021-02-15 19:40:39 )
@Blackhand Spectre and it's this thought process that because you carry a gun you have a right to police others who do not follow the rules why people like Michael and maybe you end up in situations like this.
@Shelly Shelly I agree, I think they should do away with handicaped spaces everywhere except hospitals and doctors offices where they are most likely to be used for the intended purpose, now a days so many non disabled people have a plackard/plates just to take advantage, my mom is 88 and has never gotten one, I have real issues that would warrent me to have one but I also refuse since I can walk on my own without a wheelchair,walker or cane, I also adhere to "If you don't use it you lose it." when it comes to mobility.
@Peef Rimgaar It still doesn't exonerate the man who shoved him or his baby momma parking in a handicapped spot when 4 were open, ultimately the guy shot got the dealth penalty for his actions regardless.
The very fact that he knew he had a gun on his person gave him the balls to do what he first did in the first place. Which is why he circled the car looking for a handicap tag/sticker and started the argument. If he didn't have the gun w/him he wouldn't have even started anything. Basically a coward. Big man WITH a gun.
@E Rivers They need to do away with handicapped spaces period, I know from experience if you are truly handicapped you have someone else taking care of you and you can never park in those spaces because someone who is not handicapped is in them, you are also right about (no pun intended) walking away from them, the self entitled narcissist doesn't and never will care, so you are talking to a brick wall.
@Blackhand Spectre 1. Who cares that he parked illegally? Was he the handicap parking police? As Timothy Collins so eloquently put it, "There's something to be said about the fine art of minding ones own business." 2. If he had minded his own business, no assault would have taken place. Your can't control what the other person's reactions are going to be, but you can control yours. And I'm not defending either guy. The guy that got shot could have come out, defused the situation somehow. But no, unfortunately for him he chose violence first and look what happened to him. And to think, this whole thing could have been avoided if that LAZY idiot driver would have just parked legally in the first place. Ok, time for me to let this one go. LOL!
@Blackhand Spectre You do not fire your weapon after being pushed. Drejka already had the gun unholstered, victim did not approach further and was still gunned down.
@Peef Rimgaar ya and they would’ve filed assault charges against the original assailant were he still alive, I bet his former women doesn’t park in handicapped places anymore , lolololol
@Daniel Cruz exactly bruh you can’t just assault someone and think they aren’t gonna do something black guy was at fault didn’t put his arms up in the air or nothing. You can see the black guy pick up his shorts cuz they were sagging and that in itself showed bad intentions. Both are at fault but to say the other guy was the aggressor is baffling
@Daniel Cruz he was not being civil. He was harassing the wife. He got shoved because of that. Because he was too chickenshit to shove him back he decided to kill the man.
Execution is not the appropriate response to getting shoved. Doesn't work on the playground, doesn't work in adult life either. Why does this need to be explained to you?
And the guy was sentenced to 20 years. Which is too short in my opinion.
@Jon BonBon the guy is in the wrong he should of minded his business but no that gun made him feel tuff yelling at a girl then her boyfriend step in him he got push for running his mouth plus he always had other cases for stuff just like so he shoots a man that was backing up .could of held him at gunpoint for johny law to show up but no he shoots him as he was backing up .he was just looking for a reason to use his gun because instead of being a man taking a 1v1 when he had no business trying to enforce a law when it's not his job
@Wes Mantooth wouldn't ever been assaulted if he didn't get in a man's wife's face yell at her with her kids in the car thinking it was just a woman the guy has other cases of pulling guns on women and men white and black he's a dangerous individual he put his self into a situation instigated it and then shot somebody because he was scared because he was doing something he wasn't supposed to do and then shoots a man while he's backing up
@Jon BonBon then he should call an authority cuz THAT AINT HIM. Instead he went and shot her husband and youre defending him, over a damn parking space? Gtfoh.
4 likes
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 10:09:08 (edited 2021-02-21 10:09:29 )
@Jon BonBon two wrongs dont make a right, man. It was obviously not okay for him to shove the guy. But a shove is NOTHING compared to shooting a guy in front of his kids. The fact that you are arguing they are in any way shape or form comparable is sick. Why would you even push that narrative? I honestly dont get it.
@TimTim Smith you asked me to clarify what you think. Literally word by word thats what you asked. But sure, you implied not respecting parking spaces somehow justifies getting shot
2 likes
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 18:41:54 (edited 2021-02-21 18:42:42 )
@TimTim Smith immediately after asking "I think what?" You also asked me to clarify your thoughts. I dont wanna get hung over semantics, but you didnt ask me to clarify my question, you asked me to clarify your answer which you hadnt yet given to me. And Im sorry bro, confronting someone over a parking spot and getting shot have absolutely no causal relationship. You tell them to move out of the parking space and if they dont you move on with your day. Drejka was asked if he was aware that walking up to a car and confronting the passanger over a parking spot could have started a confrontation, to which he replied "yes" then he was asked if he would do the same if he didnt have his gun to which he initially replied that he wouldnt because he was aware that there might have been a confrontation, showing he was fully prepared for the use of lethal force the moment he walked up to that car. Which is needless to say, completely insane. And why on Earth would you assume Im trying to turn this into a race thing? Are you?
1 like
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 19:09:22 (edited 2021-02-21 19:15:41 )
@TimTim Smith you have no idea of any of that, it all conjecture. Drejka is the one who instigated the confrontation, and by his own adimssion he wouldnt have confronted the woman if he didnt have his gun(showing he was willing to use deadly force roght from the get go) Again, we have no idea if djerka would have shot the man regardless of getting body checked, he has a history of pulling out his gun over minor incidents. And he shot him when he was already backing away and even turning around. His perception of apropiate use if force was already skewed to begin with. He also didnt make any attempts to defuse or remove himself from the situation once his gun was out. You cant just ask yes or no as if thats the only valid answer. They are not valid answers. The only valid answer is: we dont know.
1 like
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 19:25:37 (edited 2021-02-21 19:27:37 )
@TimTim Smith why do you keep asking if Im trolling, and I am using my common sense,use yours. If derjka hadnt pulled the trigger no one would have died, thats the only action that directly lead to a death. All other actions could have potentially had so many other results we just cant assume the outcome because of "common sense". If that was the deciding factor then its also common sense not to get into a heated argument with a stranger iver a praking lot, its common sense not to rush a stranger before defusing, its common sense not to shoot a man before trying to remove yourself from the situation, its common sense not to shoot a man who is backing away and turning his back on you. If it common sense was common we wouldnt have these type of cases. You have no idea how poeple would react, all we can go by is what did happen.
0 likes
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 21:01:52 (edited 2021-02-21 21:04:23 )
@TimTim Smith bro, if common sense had prevailed a man wouldnt have been shot and killed in front of his 5 year old...OVER A PARKING SPOT. C'mon man, don't be that guy. This is what I was talking about right from the beginning. Parking in a disabled spot is not even remotely close to a reason for getting shot. Not even close.
0 likes
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 21:31:51 (edited 2021-02-21 21:32:37 )
@TimTim Smith and it also wouldnt have happened if the shooter just moved on with his life instead of making a scene. See how that works? Its a non point. Its irrelevant.
@TimTim Smith how many people get shot over parking on disabled spots? You are acting as if getting shot over that is a given. Its not. No one in their right mind would think that. Why you keep acting as if it somehow adds up?
0 likes
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 21:50:18 (edited 2021-02-21 21:51:58 )
@TimTim Smith oh, so now you are interested in the particular context instead of what ifs yes or no questions? Its a start. Maybe they actually moved their cars, maybe he didn't confront them and was lying, maybe one of those instances was one of the other times he pulled out his gun for no reason and they booked it before he got a shot. Because he has done that in the past you know? It wasnt the first time he pulled a gun over car related incidents. Maybe this time he actually went through with it. By his own admision he does not confront people with out his gun. Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not.
Of course there is. But surely allowances should be made for speaking to a fellow citizen about their possibly violating a rule meant to help the disabled?
@BigBlack Drejka its obviously an insecure, unnestable, not smart person. He could have defend himself with the gun and not finish in jail if he hasnt unnecessarily killed a man. CAN'T YOU SEE THAT??
@Wes Mantooth wouldn't have to defend himself if he didn't get that liquid courage tries to enforce the lot like he owns it . I bet he was having a bad day wife cheating on him daughter dates black guys so he found a place where he can seem big and bad with a gun on his hip trying to check people over parking in handicap spaces smh
@M C no he approach an was the reason for the drama an even said he does it all the time the guy had other case of pulling guns on people an approaching people like he was a cop .he would never got pushed if he would of minded his business frfr an didn't yell at ladys an after he get pushed an he falls he so scared now wasn't scared when he was the windows yelling at a woman but when a man gets involved he scared .y do u think he is in prison because he was wrong theres nothing really to say about it he shot a man that was backing walking away didn't hold him at gunpoint for assault he shot him because he was scared but he put his self in the situation in the first place who the f*** hangs out at a store and wait for people to pull in a handicap spot so they can get out their car and talk s*** to them because he thinks he a cop just because he a drunk with a gun killing people that's unarm after he instigated the assault put his self in that situation but still at the people believing that he was in the right that's why he's in prison right now in anybody thinking that he was in the right let them do some stuff and they be in prison right along with him
@RiotEpidemic You can be verbally aggressive you know that right? Raising your voice is an overtly aggressive act, you can be an aggressor without raising a hand to a person.
@Lara Nelemans and that logic goes vise versa wife was yelling back trying to justify herself for who knows what. Whatever I could care less about this case it’s just common sense whose in the right here. Hope this guy got off free no charges and given a medal for a waste of his time interrogating him
@RiotEpidemic You could care less or you couldn't care less? The first one means you care about it very much and the second one means you don't care a out it at all. Here's an example for you: I couldn't care less about your opinion.
@Jon BonBon no, it would not be ok. But that does not deserve death. As you've heard (if you finished the doc) it's not his first time threatening people, including mother's with children in their vehicle, with a gun.
A rational thinking person may pull out the fun but didn't fire on someone stepping back. Showing the fun alone is stating "step back." You don't shoot someone stepping back. Or even a dog stepping back.
I'm not saying it's racism at all, I actually don't think it is. And I say that as a black man. It's simply poor judgement. Terribly poor judgement, and/or lack of value for human life
@Blackhand Spectre wrongs were done on both sides here guys, face it. The guy coming out of the store should have used words first, yes.
The guy who got pushed should not have used a weapon on an unarmed backstepping person. You can pull the gun, that sends a message. But if they step back you don't fire. It's a gun, a deadly weapon, not a rubber mallet. How isn't this common sense. Gun=deadly weapon, it's not a fist. Drawing it says enough
@Blackhand Spectre ok thanks for clarifying brother. I'm just confused as to what is being argued here 👀 I thought that was it, as the rest just doesn't make sense
@Jon BonBon no no I get your logic let’s VAR check. Women (maybe unintentionally) parks in handicapped spot. A clear non handicapped guy gets out to look. STARTS the argument. boyfriend comes out who’s clear role will be to protect his wife shoves the guy away. The guy then proceeds to pull out a gun. when he BACKS UP. There is at least a 3 second gap between him walking back after the gun is revealed and him firing. There is no defense he could have got up kept the gun pointing and either called the cops or drove away. Sorry Nazi not all of us like shooting blacks with our guns you might tho...
Ok, I must be missing something. I know that area of Clearwater and quite literally anything can happen being the extremely unpredictable Floridians that we are. You don't hard check a man into the the street from behind for arguing with your girlfriend - my ass would be dead fifty time's over (rightfully so) if I didn't ya know use my words before resorting blind violence. Black, White, Green, Yellow or indifferent you're going to catch shrapnel if you assault someone in the Crazy Capitol of these United States. Sadly, it is the society we live in until we fully evolve.
@Jon BonBon If I was so worried about someone in a handicapped spot if or if not I was handicapped I would have called the police to report. Was it ok for the victim to come out the store and push the man to the ground? No. What makes me call bullshit is that Michael Drejka had his gun on him when he went to complain to the female in the car. It makes me feel like Drejka was looking for trouble. He found a black woman in a handicapped spot and got involved when he didn't need to. It smells like old fashioned American racism to me.
There is something to be said about self-defence. If 2 animals came towards me and one of them attaxks me without questioning the situation, i would loose it too. I would, sorry! He didn't mind his own Business, but the dead one didn't too!
There's also something called standing up for what's right, i.e being a good citizen. Illegal handicap parking is actually a major issue in the US, and have caused serious issues to people with actual disabilities, but judging on your comment, you don't seem to care much about that, at all, and would let everyone and anyone ILLEGALLY park on a handicapped spot, because, after all, you're only "minding your own buisness", right?
In regards to standing up for what's right, Drejka did what every good citizen should do when he confronted the woman in the car about it. Now, if he was hostile in this confrontation, it's obviously the wrong way to go at it.
Now, to the actual violent confrontation; The victim pushing him like he did was stupid and reckless. Seemed like he barely even said a word, before pushing him to the ground. Being so quick to violence against someone you don't have a single clue of what he/she is capable of, simply doesn't seem like a smart move, and unfortunately he paid the ultimate price for it. With THAT said, the fact that Drejka actually SHOT the man for pushing him to the ground is of course more stupid and reckless. If he just pulled the gun, WITHOUT shooting, it would've been fine, but the fact that he actually shot and killed the victim even though he's backing up was so utterly cowardly and pointless.
The whole scenario is just filled with stupid shit that could've easily been avoided. Sad, really.
3 likes
Daniel Vergara2021-03-04 03:56:00 (edited 2021-03-04 04:35:46 )
@June Bug Get a grip. For starters, you don't even know who started the yelling. For all we know, it's the LADY who parked her car ILLEGALLY that started. And, him "defending" his woman by basically walking up and pushing him hard to the ground without barely even saying a word is NOT being a man, it's just being stupid. Being prone to violence doesn't equal being a man, and if you think so, you're in serious need of a reality check. If he would've actually talked to him instead of pushing him, this all would've most probably been avoided.
Also, how nice of you to justify assault, and not even caring even ONE bit that she in fact parked her car illegally on the ONE and only handicapped spot. She was NOT a victim here, which you seem to imply when you claimed the guy who got shot "defended his wife". You seem to forget the fact that she BROKE the LAW. As I see it, the kid is the real victim here, losing his father to something that could've been so easily avoidable, if they just thought before acting.
For the record, your sense of "justice" is just so off and biased it's surreal. Luckily, I am 99,99% sure you aren't a legal worker with that "logic", so at least we can rest easy on that knowledge.
Now, did the guy deserve to get shot and killed? Of course NOT. It was a stupid and cowardly thing to do, considering he was backing up when the gun was pulled. But then again, this whole scenario is just filled with stupid and avoidable events.
@Daniel Vergara lmfao who started the man admits he did ..ur like him I bet got a gun to act TUFF like I said people like u and him got picked couldn't fight so u get a gun instead of fighting it like a real MAN
@June Bug He said he started yelling? Where exactly? But yea, it really isn't that important who started the yelling. It's when it turned physical the real issue began. And no, I don't own a gun. Actually, I don't like violence at all, let alone weapons, and I would certainly think twice and try to descelate a situation like this instead of just rushing in and pushing someone. Why? Because I don't know how the person I push would react, AND more importantly, I don't know if he/she is carrying a weapon. The person I start a fight with can literally be carrying a gun for all I know (like Drejka did), so please, tell me again how it's so "manly" and "tough" (oh yea, it's spelt tough, not tuff) risking your life to start a pointless fight?
I did, for the record, box for almost a year, so I CAN fight, I just don't like it. Violence only leads to more violence, which this video clearly demonstrates, yet you still seem to think it's a good solution. Sad.
@gfelipe1 u kno he got found guilty right plus he parked illegally his self to try to check some one being pushed to the run for running your mouth doesn't give u a license to kill that's why he is dropping the soap as we speak no guns in prison an we kno he cant fight lmfaoo
@Jon BonBon if he was legitimately handicapped he could have walked into the store and reported the infraction. It would be the responsibility of the store owner to decide whether or not to take action. He had no right or responsibility to enforce the regulation.
@Wes Mantooth can’t help but think that your answer would be different if the races wee switched. Black man approaches and begins yelling and gesturing at a car with a white woman and children. The white man runs out to see who is threatening his family. He runs to protect his family, shoving the black man, who stumbles and falls. You never in a thousand years would have described the white father protecting his family as a “thug”.
@Jon BonBon never okay! I would have gotten up and walked back to my car after i 📷 the license plate; layer pressing charges for an assault. But this guy clearly was too busy huffing glue as a child so it's as expected for a low-iq human
@Jon BonBon the guy definetly shouldn't have shoved him to the ground, without even speaking to him he came up to his side and shoved him like that. That was wrong however then the other guy shooting him is like wtf levels of stupid. Both were wrong and what followed is very sad
Yes! I have to tell my stepdad that all the time. He’s a well to do white lawyer, and he has the ridiculous belief that everyone is equal and you can talk to everyone the same way. I keep telling him he is going to get killed. Getting onto people for cutting the line at the store and for not pulling up far enough at the gas station. He’s need to do like me. Head down, eyes on feet. I find it greatly increases life expectancy.
@ghostdog2041 we talk; confrontential and all that then something happens but when you see that walk then hard shove; the man had some sort of confidence thinking that he can do it and nothing could happen and it was wrong; he got a bullet. That's that.
@Peef Rimgaar someone stole the handicapped spot and got confronted. While confronting he was attacked while on the ground he shoot 1 shoot to get the attacker away.
Court may find him guilty but the simple fact remains. If he didnt assault him first he would not be dead.
The death was most likely an accident and he acted in self defence. Looking at it afterwards does not justify the situation in the moment.
The black man was a protecting husband who instead of questioning the situation took action (which is not wrong or right) The action took the white guy by surprice and once on the ground he was in a defenseless position where he tried to take control. After he fired and noticed what just happend everyone just stopped what they were doing.
Even if its clear the guy was backing off before he shoots when playing it in slowmotion (like they do) 2-3 seconds after being pushed to the ground is not a long time to determ u are safe.
Hard to judge this one but it is not fair to play it in slowmotion so it look like the white guy purposly acted in a bad way
@Jon BonBon You can't just kill someone for shoving you there is rules to force. Now say he pushed him to the ground and proceeded to cause life threatening harm it may be a bit different. Poor guy didn't need to get shot he was protecting his family like we all would.
@Jon BonBon the husband heard the confrontation & sees a man standing outside the car with his wife & children. He reacted spontaneously as he didn’t know what the guys intent was with his family!
@Wes Mantooth Sure the "thug" initiated the assault, but he was sentenced 20 years for a reason, and a very good one at that. This was a simple case of revenge, he had no reason to fire that weapon unless he was in actual danger. If he wanted to handle this situation like it should've been handled then he would've called the police or tried to resolve it right then and there, but he chose the manslaughter route. Anyone who uses a gun for getting pushed to the ground is a complete coward, and if you justify that mans actions then you are also a coward
It was way more idiotic to push someone down from behind when there's just a loud dispute. Violence should always be a last resort, and the guy who fired his gun is a massive wimp
Carlos Rivas2021-03-13 12:11:30 (edited 2021-03-13 12:13:22 )
@Terry Bird What do you like about Biden? Why did you vote for Biden? what do you expect him to do that will surpass trumps many accomplishments and kept promises?, why is Biden better than Trump?
0 likes
Carlos Rivas2021-03-13 12:14:42 (edited 2021-03-13 12:19:24 )
@Terry Bird I bet you don’t even have an answer like Everyone else I asked this question to, they act like they didn’t see it
@A-a Ron 4tw dude i’ve pulled into handicapped spots on accident before, it happens. get off your high horse you’re clearly mad as hell you don’t need to take it out in the comments
That's exactly what it is though. A fine art. Not every one has an ability or willingness to practice and maintain a high level of minding ones own business.
@Jon BonBon no one should be killed over something like that simple I'm all for gun rights but instances like this where someone kills someone over dumb shit pisses me off
True. He has no authority to enforce anything. You can't go around finding people doing something you hate with a gun. It's almost like he wanted a reason to kill someone
@Jon BonBon he's not legitimately handicapped and he has no authority to enforce laws. And why you trying to make it about race? I don't think it matters that he was black.
Just listen to his military, talk as if he was on a mission because he was. He was walking around HIS neighborhood to HIS store so he felt powerful and he felt like the protecter. He had that gun on him which made him feel like a god.
Why do people repeat what's already been established in a video. We saw and already heard it. That's why we're here! You're not teaching anyone anything by repeating someone else's examination. Shhhhhhhh!
@Didi Cortez No one here is obligated to teach you anything. The author's pinned comment is "share your thoughts" . The comment section is primarily used just for that. Each person sets their own topic of discussion by choosing a particular event or statement from the video. If that bothers you - get your ass out of the comment section.
I sorta see it as it's "his" store because he's probably there every day. He admitted he lives not that far away, probably sees a lot of the same people and same things everyday and thought maybe if he made an effort to keep inaproppriate people out of the handicapped spot that maybe the 90yr old WWII vet could get in the store without having to park around and hobble in and explain it over and over everytime the two run into each other
I guess I'll be the first to admit I have a gas station that's 'my spot' because I go there every time I need gas and I'm not traveling out of state in my commute.
Ah-shar-ya YUP exactly. You know he wouldn’t start that confrontation if he didn’t have his gun on him. This guy is fucking disgusting and makes me want to weep for humanity. I wish I could give Markeis’s family a hug.
Joseph Robinson The man was backing away when he saw the gun, so he executed a man for knocking him down. The problem with these guys who get into these situations is 1) they let their fantasies influence their real world decisions, and 2) they don’t recognize the humanity of their victims.
@Joseph Robinson What I would have done is not carry a gun in te first place, because I know that carrying a gun makes it more likely that I murder/manslaughter someone. If I had carried a gun I would have made sure not to seek out confrontations with that woman, since I know that I'd have an increased chance of murdering someone in a confrontation. And if I did carry a gun and sought out confrontations, I would make sure that I knew exactly the rules about which extraordinary situations I would be allowed to shoot and be extremely hesitant to do it, because I would really hate to kill anyone. So if someone retracted I would make sure not to shoot. Because I know that if I carry a gun then the responsibility falls on me not to kill people with it. It's called responsible gun ownership. Being pushed hurts my pride but is not life threatening.
My immediate reaction is, “I wonder if Marquis would still be alive today if some bystander had heard the argument between a clearly antagonistic white man and a black woman and told him to back off and mind his own damn business.” This is why I always pay close attention to arguments whenever I hear them, especially if they involve people of color and white folkx. I’m white and female, I may have the ability to help level the playing field in similar situations by sticking up for someone just minding their business trying to go about their day. Some of these people can get scared off if someone like them makes them feel even a little bit self-conscious, like nobody wants them there and they’re not being the hero they think they are.
I am extremely glad that you analyzed this shooting.
When I heard about it, I was very upset. It's a situation I feel like I could have been in, my kid in the car and my wife, some maniac approaching with the intention to start something.
I won't and haven't parked in a handicapped space, and I try my best to NOT participate in road rage because of shit like this.
Why the fuck would you feel sympathy for the guy who died, he literally violently pushed the killer to the ground before anything other than a verbal exchange had occurred, heated or not. I understand sympathizing with the kids or the woman, but the guy?
@trime so the risk of being beat up for something he started justifies taking a man's life?? If he was moving toward him he might've had an argument but once the man starts to back up when he pulls his weapon that shoulda been the end of it. They both shoulda went home.
The Platinum Tugboat in all fairness the guy he shot had no right body slamming him to the ground over a verbal altercation. Never would have happened if he kept his hands to himself
That’s ‘Murica for ya. Handing out guns to everybody who wants one. Guns should be reserved for law enforcement only. Letting the public have access to these deadly things causes stuff like this.
here's what I think, I think drejka shouldn't have fired. But I'm also 100% sure that had he not pulled the gun the man who was shot would have continued to attack him, you can see him walk forward and pull up his pants. He only walks backwards because drejka pulled the gun and the man feared for his life, not because he pushed him down and thought that the argument was over.
agree in any self defense training they say " find a way out of the situation because 99% of the time there is a escape route or maybe you have to make a presence of a firearm then assess the situation. If he or someone he was with needed wheelchair access then yes he could confront the woman and I am sure the woman would have moved her car no problem but he did not need the use of the ramp so it was NOT HIS PROBLEM!!!! egotistical racist prick.
Sinister Dog but none of that ever transpired. And we can’t police what people “might” have done in a situation if they didn’t do it. So what’s the point?
@Wesley Mullins Then he didn't even have to fire it, and like the detectives kept asking, he didn't even say "back off" or anything. It was completely unnecessary for him to fire, even the father started backing up when he pulled it.
@Mikey Honestly I don't agree with 100% getting rid of them, but just putting much tighter restrictions on them. The restrictions that are there are only for who can and can't buy them, but there's no requirement of knowledge of most handguns or how to operate them. I don't think you should be able to buy anything other than a handgun with a low rpm, and honestly the main reason I still support them is because most death by weapons in America are vastly due to melee weapons such as knives, and a good 90% of firearms that are tied to crimes are illegally obtained which doesn't trace back to a source such as a gun shop. They do a good job at providing self-defense for those who otherwise can't defend themselves in the case of an aggressor, but honestly the man in this video shouldn't have shot it period and the father was already backing off when he did. Also pepper spray would've probably worked really well too, he didnt need a gun.
Calmly talking to somebody is not "creating a situation." VIOLENTLY shoving somebody out of the blue because you don't like the words they are saying IS "creating a situation." If the dead THUG didn't want a "situation," then he shouldn't have acted like a THUG.
The other guy shouldn't have pushed him. In America, almost EVERYONE has a gun. If I was the man who got shot, I wouldn't have been so aggressive and stupid to push this other guy on the floor who definitely looked like trouble. 0.0
@Mikey " It's also true that, if every Uk citizen had a permit to carry a big fucking weapon, the number would be about 10x that. " - BAHAHAHA. Based on what evidence would that be true? How about you cite some sources, because last I checked there are multiple countries that have really high gun ownershit and low crime. Finland, denmark, france, norway.
So those already contradict your claim.
Fun fact, in the UK there is a very high chance that when a breakin happens they do it when the owners are home, somewhere around 80%, but it happens only about 15% of the time in other countries with gun ownership..... i wonder if that has to do with anything.
@Mikey You know when asked to cite something it helps to actually list something useful to what you are claiming. That does not have anything to do with what you just claimed. Tell me did you just find some random link and copy it?
@Clint McCaleb And the other man embarked on physical assault over just words. Lets not forget the part the other man played. You don't use physical actions against just words. No matter how triggered you are.
@T. Meyer Well old can be subjective. To a 12 year old 24 years of age can be considered old.
Saying someone makes less then 100K a year isn't really an insult because you can live a very enjoyable life below that. Also doesn't include possible inheritance, partner making the money. But if you're saying life is miserable under 100k a year, there is a problem.
Limited education, well if you're referring to the school system as it is, that isn't much of an insult anyway. An education doesn't reflect intelligence since its more about memorizing information and just writing it out on tests to get a good grade. That's more of an appeal to authority fallacy since you find default value in the education system that not everyone does.
The same applies to traveling, not everyone cares to travel and you don't need to travel to learn about other cultures. You can talk to people from other cultures over the internet.
A body cannot be shapeless unless it doesn't exist. The concept of shapes were taught in kindergartner.
IF you're trying to say these apply to me, no. Most do not, and the ones that do are not an insult at all, and makes you seem really shallow if those are points that are that valuable to you.
@JokerSleuth Well no but actually no! It's self defense even if you start the altercation as long as you don't escalate the altercation to something physical, since it was a verbal argument and the black guy did what's legally defined as, oh ASSAULT. Then it was most definitely self defense.
Shooting was not justified at all. But he did blind side him. He could of easily said something to the guy and deescalated and went home to have dinner.
when you say create a situation do you mean interact with other people? because I think when that man came up from behind and attacked him he had no idea the man was even there so i dont see how he created the threat as far as he knew she was alone...
@kasagure killing someone for parking in a handicap spot is definitely a criminal offense. Or "teaching people you can't get away with everything and to follow the damn rules" as Crock put it.
@Ostaf of course! i wholeheartedly agree. however, Mr. Crock has his opinion and you have yours. neither are criminal offenses, merely opinions on said criminal offense.
@Crockinator07 i get what you mean, the woman was wrong for parking there and her husband was an asshole for pushing him. But thats no excuse for shooting him.
@Crockinator07 The only problem is Micheal Drejka is a fearful little puppy that couldn't handle the little tussle that he admitted to starting. When things got real he pulled a gun in a fist fight. That's not self defense, that's being a coward. His life wasn't in danger, only his embarrassment.
Why park at a disabled parking spot though? As a disabled person it annoys me to no end to see people who don't have a disabled parking card park because "it's just 5 minutes"
Still you don't kill them, you talk to people parking there and appeal to their sense of doing the right thing and their sense of shame. Or you approach a nearby police officer who has the car towed (did that a few times) or you deflate their tires (my dad used to do this when I was a kid and people would illegally park on disabled spots)
The guy with the hero complex looking for an excuse to shoot someone is just that and his actions are reprehensible. But I do condone berating people who park in those spots and shouldn't. I drove a car for a while that isn't associated with handicapped people so people would often yell at me or keep watching me as soon as I parked only to apologize when I place the card and take my crutches. That's the preferred method of dealing with people that park at the disabled spot. Not bringing a gun to find an excuse to shoot someone
I don’t even understand why you feel the need to also berate the woman in this situation? Why bring it up? Anyone who watches this video has no idea what this disabled spot even looks like! I live here and between the rain, heat, and traffic, if a disabled spot has no post and the paint of the ground is not kept up, it can be overlooked if your not specifically looking for it. So for you to even bring up the wife parking there is shitty. It’s like saying she kind of deserves what happened just a little bit… The only reasonable comments should be about how tragic this was not “yeah the guy shouldn’t have shot him but she also shouldn’t have parked there”
@Melissa Coulter If there wasn't a shooting involved this would be a story about a person berating shitty people parking on handicapped spots and then getting violently attacked.....
The shooting is tragic but as a disabled person who often has to deal with the handicapped spots (and often toilets too) being taken by shitty people who are healthy I can't sympathize with the woman. it sucks for the kids and the man that got killed. And none of it would have happened if that woman wasn't a terrible person who parks at the handicapped spot
@Robert Grosser well, not for "no" reason; he did assault him. Although it may not have been justified, it's not like he was shot for just standing there.
People shouldnt have a gun at all except for hunting. 33 thousand deaths per year due to weapons in america vs 70 in germany. Adjusted to the same populations thats around 280 deaths, so not even 1% of the weapon deaths
TURD BURGLAR dude he was backing up when he shot him. I mean I get drawing a weapon when you’re scared, but he was literally backing up. That is absolutely not a deadly threat.
TURD BURGLAR exactly what I’m saying dude. Nothing wrong with showing a gun if you feel threatened, but theres absolutely no reason to shoot someone dead without giving them a chance to back up.
Michael B he WAS shot for just standing there. Once he backed away and wasn’t coming towards him he was no longer a threat. He was shot for standing 6 feet away under the guise of “I thought he was going to hurt me.”
@TURD BURGLAR Except they can relatively easily "come take it" when they create a massive power discrepancy in favor of the military and police by limiting what 'the people' can legally own.
@Hagen Re, the argument for taking away guns runs contrary to the 2nd Amendment to our Constitution, which says this right may not be abridged or infringed upon, period. It's not a gun problem, it's the criminals who use guns against police and citizens that are the real problem. Your argument has no merit in my country.
@Hagen Re, our 2nd Amendment to our Constitution doesn't say guns in civilian hands are only for hunting, but this right shall not be abridged or infringed upon, period. The vast majority of the problem here is criminals who use guns to perpetrate crimes against police, business owners, home owners, their spouses and their children. Go pontificate somewhere else.
@Michael B , Well, If I was in a car with my kids and a man harassed me I might think he was a kidnapper or something. If she had a gun then she could probably argue justifiable action based on imminent threat. That guy was looking for trouble so he could fulfil his fantasy.
TURD BURGLAR you know that there is such a thing like calculating per capita... so yes you can compare these countries. You mention diversity yet everyone knows that the biggest differentiator of the US from developed countries is the lack of good and accessible education and healthcare and the lack of societal accountability in favour of extreme individualism. Sprinkle accessible and widespread gun usage = Todays US. Of course a country wide ban would extremely decrease this scenarios. You can carry arms in many countries but you have to go through a process and you can not buy them at a supermarket. However without proper education and healthcare gun violence will be very desired as a result of the idiocratic development in the US.
@TURD BURGLAR the victim didn't use deadly force, and may have felt his family was in danger. We can't ask him for his side. If he pulled a gun, I'd agree.
Matthew Burgner yeah the government wants to take your AR because they aren’t sure their tanks, missiles, and bombs are enough.🙄Orr there’s just a horrendous gun problem in America. And I say that as a gun owner.
@Hagen Re people kill not guns. If he didn't have a gun but had a knife would you want to get rid of knives? What if he had a stick? You can go on and on about a killing
@TURD BURGLAR where he fired, but mainly where he apparently didn't actually feel like his life was in danger, and further, where he even continues in the interview after having plenty of time to reflect on the situation that he wouldn't have done anything different. I could find some sympathy for his situation if he misread things in the heat of the moment, but he didn't. He's just a person who spent a lot of time convincing himself that he was man enough to kill someone at the first opportunity, and he did.
@Hagen Re And there are so many wannabee law enforcement people in Germany, people who would go to your car and lecture you for not having the handicapped sticker. That would be ugly if we had guns everywhere.
0 likes
Ven Gray2020-08-21 21:07:27 (edited 2020-08-21 21:07:52 )
@Colin Nadeau No problem with my guns, if you having a gun problem take it to a gunsmith.
Grill side Pickin the guy that broke no laws is the only one not alive and thats not right. This should concern you more considering there are people who arent skilled to carry, that carry
@TURD BURGLAR I'll say this. The push was unnecessary. The criminal lies to police, shows no remorse and admits he would just shoot someone instead of fighting them. A threat to his life?A beating isn't the end of the world and it would maybe make guys like this think twice before they draw a weapon infront of kids and take away someone's father over petty nonesense. His god complex and lack of responsible gun use got him in trouble but someone else lost their life. I don't see a push as equal to a killing a human being, nor does the law and nor would you if you had compassion for the victim
Hagen Re except those statistics are skewed, 2/3rds of those are gang on gang violence and the majority of the rest are suicides, I don’t think a German should be throwing stones when it comes to laws put in place to stop tyranny...
The 2nd Amendment is not limitless. Many states' specific restrictions carry a provision to the effect that the state legislature may enact laws regulating the carrying, concealing, and/or wearing of arms. The more idiots misuse their gun rights, the more likely this will lead to further restrictions. Which makes perfect sense.
@Bobby Dotson Tell this the victims of school shootings. Guns make killings way easier, which is why they are used...and also cowardly from a larger distance. You would not seriously state "bombs don't kill people, so it is ok for everybody to carry a bomb". Maybe gun ownership should only be legal after passing a really complicated test, that might prevent fools from having one
@TURD BURGLAR ahahhhhh gottem, like every one of you guys I call out I stomp so hard you can't even respond lol - you guys fall apart at ANY arguement that's even SLIGHTLY articulated I swear LOL.
@handsomesmartass.. completely disarming us is probably not going to work. But I am in favor of a closer assessment of the gun owner. If you don't have the capacity to have great respect for guns, and aren't interested in spending time learning how to handle them, or spend time getting familiar with when you might have to protect yourself with one.. consequences. If having to shoot or be killed isn't something you never want to happen. Then I wouldn't trust you with a gun.
@TURD BURGLAR that's what I've always learned. Act responsibly, until someone acts irrationally towards you, then behave 100 times more irrational. Smart leaders with a gift for coming up with solutions can influence the attitude of a whole damn bunch of people. I'm a Republican, fairly conservative, and I don't see things the way a whole hell of a bunch of the left does. But they all are my countrymen. That has to carry some weight with the American people. Just the balls to sit down and see if anything can be worked on or solved can have a big effect on people willingness to compromise. Or we can fight until it's a war. But your promise to come at folks 100 times more viscous is not very scary. Probably a better chance you'd start crying to your mama if things ever got as horrible as a war.
Right.. I think it might not be right to start trying to mess with you. But since I know you work out, now, you might find out you enjoy a good ol fight.
@TURD BURGLAR uh, just no. Nothing about this says, 'white people cannot protect themselves if someone who's black attacks them.' This is about going 0 to 100 in a moment.. using deadly force when none was called for. Not protection. Someone shoves you to the ground (over a confrontation that you started, no less) and your reaction is to shoot them? Fear of getting beat up shouldn't justify using a device that kills easily.
@Ronald Raygun I know, it was likely already addressed later on. I was responding to something that Mr. Turd wrote early on that caught my attention. I didn't scroll through all of the comments to see if anyone had already replied to his statement.
@TURD BURGLAR The only reason why the US government isn't taking away firearm ownership rights is because of money. The NRA funds politicians. No government would ever be afraid of those millions of firearm-wielding individuals because a crowd with rifles an army does not make. Actually that's the reason why the National Guard exists: They've got tanks, fighter aircraft, leadership, the whole lot. No amount of individuals with rifles can challenge that. And that's why the "liberty" argument albeit true when it was conceived, doesn't stand any more. It was destroyed the moment the National Guard (let alone the Army and the Marines who would also intervene in a generalized uprising) got tanks, artillery and fighters. They would just pulverise everyone and step on their corpses to get to the rest.
@Michael B "well, not for "no" reason; he did assault him. "
He defended his wife. If he really assaulted Drejka then Drejka would definately not have a change pull out a gun, he'd be on the ground bleeding from a gaping headwound as he was getting kicked in the face.
@Hagen Re guns are only a force amplifier also use per capita numbers not absolute ones I disagree guns should be hard to acquire but not illegal To be fair we have more arson and other violent crime
Worst thing anyone can do (guilty or innocent): talk to the police without a lawyer present. That being said, this guy didn't have to shoot as the guy stopped as soon as he saw the gun was being drawn. And then he backed up.
What’s the legality of brandishing a firearm in self defense? I’m just curious. I thought it was illegal. But yeah ofc I don’t think the dad had murderous intent, just wanted to show who he thought was a jerk to go away (I do not support shoving a dude but I don’t think it constitutes death).
@spaghetti hi spaghetti, i agree with you and am also curious about its legality.
ALSO FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE: no matter how minor you think the offense your being accused of is (even if its just like shoplifting) ALWAYS ASK FOR AN ATTORNY IMMEDIATELY ! the phrase "anything you say can and will be used against you" is so true. your words will be manipulated even if you are innocent, it is CRUCIAL to have an attorney present whenever you are speaking to officers/investigators, because they are really brutal.
@spaghetti It's sort of a grey area influenced by your jurisdiction's definition of self defense. In most areas (in the US, anyway), if someone verbally threatens you or physically menaces you but has no weapon, and you pull a weapon in response, the person commiting armed assault is *you*. You are the clear-and-present danger to the health and safety of everybody around you.
If you're in a situation where someone is threatening you with a weapon (such as a knife, club, or firearm), responding by clearing leather is generally a legally acceptable response. Keeping in mind that pulling the trigger if they're not aggressively trying to homicide you to death immediately swings the other way back into illegal, and 'warning shots' or 'firing into the air' should generally always be considered illegal almost without regard for context.
Insert the usual not-a-lawyer stuff here, etc, etc; I'm just a guy who works in a field where being robbed is an everpresent hazard, knows a couple cops, and has done some independent research.
EDIT: Apparently Stand Your Ground laws (which state you can respond to deadly force with deadly force) are actually super uncommon east of the Rockies, so legally the correct response—if you're not in a Western Expansion state—is actually probably to run like a mofo if someone is threatening you, even if you believe they're a clear and present threat to your life and have a weapon to counter that threat. shrugs Weird.
@Abel Jacobo there is a matter of degrees. There was wrong doing at several stages in this affair, but some were worse than others. 1) parking illegally 2) starting a shouting match, probably not illegal but escalating the situation. Should have taken photos and reported them if he wanted to do something. 3) the push. This was an overreaction, probably a minor assault. 4) the shooting. This was a massive overreaction. Probably murder.
Only one of these acts demands significant jail time.
@Test Test this had nothing to do with a parking spot....this happend because the boyfriend thought he was in a video game and assaulted a guy unprovoked. He had every right to do so under federal law.....state law probably not.
@Gabe Jenkins I don't own guns personally.....rather fight.....but I completely avoid even fighting because someone could have a gun....you never know...it's best to respect the law and everything will be fine.
@Abel Jacobo he stopped and backed up there was no reason for him to be shot maybe as a warning he could have just held the weapon out but the guy wasn’t coming at him at the point in the video
@spaghetti many people have this misconception. It's not true and makes no sense. For instance, I might need to use my gun. Pull it out to prepare myself. Realize I don't need my gun. Put it away. Not illegal.
@Test Test legally it was wrong to push the guy.....and also shooting the guy....all.
My point is these animalistic impulses to react violently is hidden in everyman....just how the black dude needed to escalate from words to assault.....the white dude felt needed to escalate from assault to homicide.....
It's best not to escalate at all.
Because there's always a level more extreme that can be reached fast.
It depends. If someone assaults you, there is a real possibility that person could knock you out or down and get your gun. Now you're the one who's dead.
@Abel Jacobo yes, if the incident had stopped at the drawing of the gun I would say the armed man did nothing illegal. It would have been appropriate to make an arrest for the assault and punishment (if a first offence) could have been suspended jail time and a small fine. But no, instead we have a dead man and a murderer because the man with the gun lost all sense of proportion. The only thing that would justify shooting a person is if his own life was in danger, and the video clearly shows that the attacker was backing off once he saw the gun. Firing under those circumstances is murder. "But he started it" is not a justification. It is not his place to dispense "justice" as he sees it, only to defend himself and he went further than that.
So many people here are debating whether or not the father should have pushed Drejka, as if he was somehow asking for it by doing so. That's bullshit. This strange guy was yelling aggressively at his wife with his kids in the car - if anything, Drejka was the one asking for it. In fact, it seems to me he made this whole scene on purpose because he had a territorial delusion about "his store" and an itchy trigger finger. He wanted to shoot someone, and the fact that he wasn't at all sorry for what he did just proves that. You don't start screaming at strangers and then claim you're the one who was wronged when shit goes south. Life doesn't work that way. Drejka is the aggressor here, and a pathetic gun-happy lunatic at that.
This is the perfect example of when you have a hammer everything looks like a nail.. he put himself in situations knowing he had a gun, he just wanted to use it.
I don't know about this whole you carry a hammer everything looks like a nail business. I carry a knife with me everyday and I'm not stabbing and cutting s*** all the time.....
@C Jones Big difference between a gun and a knife, bro. One is purely for hurting/scaring people and one is an everyday tool. I've carried a pocket knife since I was a Boy Scout, 40+ years ago. I'm hardly going to pull out my Swiss Army Knife in a conflict situation. But, if you're talking switchblades, I'd certainly agree.
All I Know is that in a street fight Anything can Happen!! Anything it's a very Dangerous situation You Can't Compared a Boxing Fight or a MMA Fight to a Street fight! But if I ever get in a Actual Street fight my Mission is to get the DUDE out!!! ASAP by a Knockout!!! And Bounce
3 likes
Erik Molnar2020-04-19 16:28:03 (edited 2020-04-19 16:35:07 )
I have been in 2 real fights during the past 15 years. Luckily not recently. The first one I was cornered in a hallway. I'm gonna be real honest here. The man didnt like me sleeping with his ex in his house. Luckily we weren't doing that but I was cornered. I grappled him, got around, as soon as I let go telling him I wouldn't fight back, he gave me a well deserved black eye. I made amends later by splitting a 12 pack with him months later. The 2nd was just a wrestling match where my opponent threatened to throw me off a 2 story deck. I'm afraid of heights and didnt know that karate moves are my strong point. He ended up face down. No punches were thrown. This guy on the other hand is the instigator but trying to be the enforcer of a parking space and a bully. The gun allowed him to be a bully when he is actually not a good fighter and a pussy. I feel so bad for that mom and her kids. Its men like that coward who will leave the most messed up lasting impression on them. I have a ton of black friends .. yes invited to come to my house anytime, we talk on the phone, etc. I'm doing everything I can to connect with friends in Liberia, Cagayan de Oro... I have a Muslim gf in Indonesia who is going to visit me in Texas this year if possible. I'll doing my part as many people these days are in making MLKs dream come true. But shithead bullies and murderers like this asshole send us 2 steps back everytime! Pardon my language. Just really sad
Erik Molnar2020-04-19 17:02:47 (edited 2020-04-19 17:03:45 )
@Dog Tube Me neither but I'm not afraid of other men either. I take care of myself so no problems. I'm not criticizing you. But I would like to say that people arent that bad. And if you always stay on the right side of the law, you will have protection. Once you cross that line, your screwed so that's my best advise
@Erik Molnar Yeah I get you , Me either I'm not afraid of no one! What I'm saying that in a street fight it's a whole different World from what I train As a Fighter ..and that my Mission is to Get the K.O ASAP if I ever have to Get in a street fight
@C Jones Self defense? Like legitimate self defense. Or you're regularly doing jobs where it's handy to have a knife on you. In general it can be handy to have a knife. It's a multi purpose tool
@Seymour Cox So what about situations where people's lives are clearly in danger? The video shows us a case of a legitimate coward, as he had no reason to shoot. However, if say I were to get into a legitimate fight when I wasn't the one to instigate it, and I'm at risk of serious injury or death? I have the right to defend myself. Calling anyone who holds a viewpoint like that a coward shows an ignorance to reality. Most of the time it's not about proving some perception of manliness or bravery, it's merely about defending yourself. Just because cases like the one documented here do show a coward, that doesn't mean most cases follow the same line as this one.
@steelrain7.62API because a knife has other uses. A gun doesn't. I know ppl just like that. They are constantly wanting to find themselves in some situation where they can blast someone. Those guys are out there. BTW, I'm not directing that at all concealed carriers, just ones like him.
@lifesarisk actually there are more than 2 uses. There are let's see flare guns,squirt guns, bb guns, hand guns, rifles, signal guns that only shoot blanks to signal the start or end of somthing I could go on all day. You need to do some research with your entire bang bang theory. Its ignorance that kills people not guns
@Johnathan Busse when you mentioned why a knife might be useful you stated what any knife can be used for, you didn't say a knife can be used for many things like kitchen knives, pocket knives, etc.
squirt guns and bb guns are completely irrelevant as they aren't what we're talking about, a signal gun is less relevant as it's just a gun without the damage part, hand guns and rifles are used for loud bang bang or to hurt/damage something/someone, that just leaves flare guns which could be grouped with squirt guns and bb guns but they're pretty different so we can add to my list "make big light (in the case of a flare gun)"
although everything you mentioned falls under the title gun there is a big difference between a mansion and a shack or a lamborghini and a honda.
@steelrain7.62API - I think you missed Maurice's point - when Drejka was asked by the cops why he wasn't worried that by initiating a confrontation that confrontation could escalate, his answer was that he wasn't worried because he was armed. he basically admitted that he was happy to escalate any confrontation to the point that he would shoot his way out of it. that is very much a "carry a hammer everything looks like a nail " kind of mindset
am i wrong to lack empathy for people who responds with violence before anything else, im not saying the dude deserved to get shot but idk be civilized? and you will never get shot by stupid people.
C J some people either carry a knife (like a pocket knife) or a gun, depending on where you live or the kind of life you live, I don’t think it’s weird
@C WG well obviously he wasnt since hes serving 20 years right now lol. The guy was backing of. He wanted to take revenge, which is why hes serving right now.
@Gorgeous George ..... I'm not carrying a knife to feel more secure in social situations... It is a tool. I've never been afraid to go down dark alleyways knife or no.
Was just thinkin the very same thing.! 👌 Every one is a hard man when packin heat! A real hard guy Startin a fight with a woman too.. He shoulda kept his mouth shut there was plenty other non handicapped spaces that were even closer to the shop door, so yeah I think he definitely wanted to use his gun man! ✌
@C WG if your wife or GF an kids are being shouted at aggressively you'd wanna protect them. But your right. He coulda talked to the guy instead of pushing for sure man. I think the guy that shot wouldn't have acted so brave pickin on a woman if he didn't have a gun.!
@Gorgeous George u live in uk I bet mate yeah? Coz I understand what u mean. Most young guys that carry knives there end up killed or slashed up on a daily basis! Knife crime in UK is outta hand. It's crazy, I'm from Ireland so I see an hear it all
@ken dalton women can stand up for themselves better than many men can. it usually ends in the harasser giving up and walking away with their tail between their legs. but once a white knight gets involved? then it suddenly turns into a potentially deadly situation.
@Jangus Roundstone thats not how this works. no matter how deeply someone offends you with their words, once you escalate to violence anything that follows after that was your gamble.
New M00N did he tho? The law says different.. he started an issue with someone’s wife and kids over something that didn’t have anything to do with him and then he couldn’t take his ass whooping like a man so he shoots him.. that’s the type of man you respect? One that can’t pick up his fists and fight for himself? Couldn’t be me
And Americans still believe it's nothing wrong with their laws when in comes to gun licensing. Everyone running up and down with guns like back in the days in wild wild west
New M00N if you are THAT SCARED of being pushed like that, you should not interact with any strangers in public! NONE! You should hide at home!
0 likes
Sofia Rune2020-04-29 12:38:06 (edited 2020-04-29 12:38:36 )
@boagski
boagski
If you are scared of being shot dead after pushing someone like that, you should not interact with any strangers in public! NONE! You should hide home!
@Sydnarella Exactly. The same is true of 99.9% of guns in the US. Now, imagine a society where nobody carried guns. Wouldn't that be nice? Well, that is the rest of the developed world. People only carry guns around in war-torn, third world countries. Americans are unique, in that they will give up 50 of their children every week, for their "right to be bear arms". Yet, their right to bear arms is all based on fear. So, their fear is greater than their love for their children. The rest of the world can't understand that.
Frees Peach Why does it make y’all so mad that they talk? We get justice thanks to them being stupid enough, and the detectives doing their job. It’s the best that can happen
jonnygotagun I don’t mean mad, mad. I mean the comments that seem to find it so disappointing. Makes me feel like they’re telling the murderers to be safe lol
@Míriam You're reading your own bias into it. I made a statement about how incredible it is that they don't know their rights and don't shut up and lawyer up. Their Mirandized, but just ignore that and dig themselves in deeper. I'm talking about their rights! It's got nothing to do with wanting them to get away with anything.
Frees Peach I didn’t mean it like in a super serious way. I was following the conversation with my point of view. Also, I’d like to think even if they got a lawyer, they would end up screwed anyway, just because karma, or the astronomical stupidity that made them murder someone in the first place. Like in this case, this shithead’s narcissism made him think he was gonna get away w it and he was friends w the detectives 🤦♀️
It was almost certainly racially motivated- not illegal parking. After all, he illegally parked next to the woman to badger her about her parking. The illegal parking was an "excuse to rightfully get pissed off at some black people" and the push was clearly an "excuse" to shoot a black man as well. If he even once said the word "violent thug" in reference to that man, that's proof enough of racial motivation. He was just looking for an opportunity to shoot someone and get away with it. If the CCTV wasn't there, he probably would've gotten away with it because that's unfortunately how the police and judicial system also paints black men. He probably would've gotten away with the "self-defense" defense if it hadn't been for that CCTV footage. He clearly wanted to shoot someone and has this gross fetish with the military (which he was probably prohibited from enrolling in because he made it too obvious that he wanted to shoot someone) shows that his admiration with the people who serve is connected with his sick desire to just shoot people in the name of "justice".
Exactly. I don't think anyone here is saying parking in a handicap space, and even shoving a man to the ground for harassing your wife/gf is right, but it is absolutely no reason to kill a man over. Especially when him just pulling the gun ended the altercation completely. But his ego, and wannabe cop bs made him get into a situation he had no business being in and lose his restraint and pull the trigger when it was absolutely unnecessary. People like this cannot be allowed to carry a gun.
"If you’re the type to let illegal parking bother you, you aren’t cut out to be the type who carries a gun." You realize that you're describing all police officers, right? LOL
@Kat Howard I agree that there some racial motivation is likely, mostly because he mentioned how he tries to "not let that come out of him" or something along those lines, mentilning his grandfather I believe. Sorry, I honestly didn't feel like searching the video from it. But I just don't know if that's really what made him oull this trigger, seems like a wannabe cop more than anything.
@The Fourth Man Don't you understand how big it is to take someone's life? You have to take a measured approach, otherwise why not just give the death penalty for any law broken for any reason? You're thinking about you're right to shoot and likely kill. Think about the victim that is killed over something that's just a good reason to be killed over. Don't you see how he waited, and then shot?
About 15 minutes into this interview, he should have uttered the following words, "I want a lawyer"! I cannot emphasize enough the value of legal representation in this situation.
I love SO much when they ask a million questions just to get the person deeper and deeper into the lie...all the while the suspect thinks the police are believing them so they just keep talking and talking.
I hope I never have to use it but, better to have one and not ever need it then to need one and not have it. I go to the range too. Have a lil fun. #AlpineShootingRange
It's so scary to see someone truly think they did nothing wrong and behave so calmly after shooting and killing someone. Like they expect high-fives or something and don't feel at all guilty.
It's due to the fact that a lot of ppl don't understand laws... in fact probably only 20 or 30 percent of the American population really have decent understanding of laws I'm guessing and most of them are probably lawyers or involved in law in some way. Ppl think that of u get into an altercation u can just shoot someone and say u were defending yourself. The law is pretty complex and the statutes put in place are for specifications of situations. Most ppl don't understand the law or have misconceptions which lead them to thinking things like this are ok for them to do and then they're surprised when they go in front of actual lawyers and prosecutors who inform them they can't
@Looking 4 Things Lol maybe in the other cases but I'm not sure there was honestly any racism in this case. The guy shot some guy he felt threatened by and made a terrible decision, that's pretty much it. It's got nothing to do with his race
0 likes
John Sampson2021-12-21 06:01:00 (edited 2021-12-21 06:04:27 )
Hmm....I don't know. Michael could've legitimately feared for his life in that moment with a big black man who just shoved him to the ground standing over him. He shouldn't have shot, especially if the black guy backed off after the firearm was brandished...but I don't know if this situation is so black-and-white (excuse the pun).
Calm down folks. The guy ran up and assaulted him. You shouldn't assault people....when you hit someone they can escalate to shoot you . It's sad the msn died....he should not have been assaulting the man...the consequences were a fatal shooting...
@Looking 4 ThingsIt is also because of people like you that racism will never end. New generations are much more tolerant, but there is always someone out there that make sure the word racism it's daily mentioned.
@T W Any real man would have reacted exactly the same way. When your family including your young children are risk a real man would do everything he possibly could to protect them. He behaved exactly as Id want my father to in the situation.
Revelation 21 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth. For the first heaven and the first earth was gone, and the sea is now no more.
2 And I John saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from Lord God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
3 And I heard a great voice from the throne, saying: Behold the tabernacle of Lord God with men, and he will dwell with them. And they shall be his people; and Lord God himself with them shall be their Lord God.
4 And Lord God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes: and death shall be no more, nor mourning, nor crying, nor sorrow shall be any more, for the former things are passed away.
5 And he that sat on the throne, said: Behold, I make all things new. And he said to me: Write, for these words are most faithful and true.
6 And he said to me: It is done. I am Alpha and Omega; the beginning and the end. To him that thirsteth, I will give of the fountain of the water of life, freely.
7 He that shall overcome shall possess these things, and I will be his Lord God; and he shall be my son.
8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, they shall have their portion in the pool burning with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.
9 And there came one of the seven angels, who had the vials full of the seven last plagues, and spoke with me, saying: Come, and I will shew thee the bride, the wife of the Lord God Lamb.
10 And he took me up in spirit to a great and high mountain: and he shewed me the holy city Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from Lord God,
11 Having the glory of Lord God, and the light thereof was like to a precious stone, as to the jasper stone, even as crystal.
12 And it had a wall great and high, having twelve gates, and in the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel.
13 On the east, three gates: and on the north, three gates: and on the south, three gates: and on the west, three gates.
14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them, the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lord God Lamb.
15 And he that spoke with me, had a measure of a reed of gold, to measure the city and the gates thereof, and the wall.
16 And the city lieth in a foursquare, and the length thereof is as great as the breadth: and he measured the city with the golden reed for twelve thousand furlongs, and the length and the height and the breadth thereof are equal.
17 And he measured the wall thereof an hundred and forty-four cubits, the measure of a man, which is of an angel.
18 And the building of the wall thereof was of jasper stone: but the city itself pure gold, like to clear glass.
19 And the foundations of the wall of the city were adorned with all manner of precious stones. The first foundation was jasper: the second, sapphire: the third, a chalcedony: the fourth, an emerald:
20 The fifth, sardonyx: the sixth, sardius: the seventh, chrysolite: the eighth, beryl: the ninth, a topaz: the tenth, a chrysoprasus: the eleventh, a jacinth: the twelfth, an amethyst.
21 And the twelve gates are twelve pearls, one to each: and every several gate was of one several pearl. And the street of the city was pure gold, as it were transparent glass.
22 And I saw no temple therein. For the Lord God Almighty is the temple thereof, and the Lord God Lamb.
23 And the city hath no need of the sun, nor of the moon, to shine in it. For the glory of Lord God hath enlightened it, and the Lord God Lamb is the lamp thereof.
24 And the nations shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth shall bring their glory and honour into it.
25 And the gates thereof shall not be shut by day: for there shall be no night there.
26 And they shall bring the glory and honour of the nations into it.
27 There shall not enter into it any thing defiled, or that worketh abomination or maketh a lie, but they that are written in the book of life of the Lord God Lamb.
I wonder what went through the victims head when he desided to initiate physical violence. "Somebody is arguing with my partner so I'm going to push them to the ground."
Did he deserve to die? Probably not. Was he a "good guy"? Definitely not.
I don’t think he was ever scared for his own life, I think he was ticked off he was pushed and wanted to get him back. His ego got really bruised and he felt he had the right to retaliate.
I'm not saying you're wrong, it's clear this guy was far too ready to use his gun and had road rage issues but... Why the hell did the guy shove him to the ground?
@Magical fairy Oh I agree he didn't deserve to die for the decision, absolutely - it's just I don't understand it. It might be because I'm British, but in a country where it feels like everyone seemingly has a gun - and especially in a state with the SYG law - it just seems absolutely insane to attack the guy instead of getting in between the situation and saying "hold up, what the hell are you doing?"
Drejka is guilty as hell obviously, but it's not hard to imagine a situation where the shooting is reasonable; if the guy didn't take half a step back, there's suddenly a world of reasonable doubt in play.
@Lee K i apologize for coming off as defensive or rude. I wasn’t expecting such a mature and actually thought out reply so I appreciate it actually and can see your point
@Magical fairy I didn't see your reply as defensive and rude at all ^^ No problem whatsoever. I can see why you'd think I'd be one of those internet nutters trying to excuse the murder (and perhaps I should have detailed more in my initial post given the issues around discussions on race/police excesses of power etc. in modern society), but no, it's honestly just the mentality of the situation that intrigued me.
I disagree honestly. While he was probably pissed hindsight is 20/20, if I got pushed like that I would’ve definitely pulled my gun. But I likely wouldn’t have fired that quickly when he backed up.
@Zasha exactly pulling the gun is a thing most people would do if they were armed, but he watched him take 3 steps back and still kept pulling the gun out waited 1 second and shot him, no reason for that coulda said back up or something instead of shooting him after watching him back off
Drejka wanted to be that guy on the news who was forced to shoot someone to save his own life. He was looking to pick a fight so they would attack him and give him the ability to kill someone. I think he paused before firing the shot so that he could go over a check list in his head. I hope he never gets out of prison and I hope he lives a long time.
4 likes
P L2021-01-05 00:59:21 (edited 2021-01-05 01:01:10 )
@Lucius Kiirus His plan fell down the sink when was discovered that he harassed people previously in the same location and the gun threats that he did in the past. Some people want to violated the speed limit after buying a car, Drejka was itching for use his concealed carry and gun to kill someone.
@P L I believe you are right, he wanted to kill someone. In my mind, a rational person who buys a gun might do so for defense with the hope they never have to use it. I think a person who is armed needs to actively avoid trouble when any other option is available. That does not however mean they don't go out and enjoy life. Just avoid known trouble. Drejka was looking for it. I hope people view this case as an opportunity to learn. So sad for the victims.
He literally flew when my dude shoved him, to be honest I don't think it he pushed him that hard, rather it was a solid push and Michael went down because for one, he was no match to the other guy, physically and second he was in a bad angle and didn't stand his ground when the push came, meaning his gravity center was immediately fucked and he flew. That shit certainly bruised his ego bad. Also, he took his sweet time before shooting, sooo the intent was there. My dude backed away a lot and froze, he probably would've dipped if it wasn't because hi girlfriend and the kids were RIGHT THERE.
@Lee K he might have been an aggressive type of person. His wife + kids were in the car and a stranger is making trouble with her. Not everyone handles everything with talking, and he's wrong for pushing him. Doesn't mean he had to be shot
Yes, exactly what I see. As a Marine we are trained to employ violence at a threat. The only threat I see is his ego was bruised because he was pushed to the ground quicker than he could have repelled it. He was attacked, this is obvious and it was a bad decision on attackers part, however...this idiot said attacker stepped toward him, thus tripping the 21 foot rule. Total bullshit. The victim now is the person shot. Drejka should have admitted he made a bad call, got up and walked away. Instead he decided to shoot a man that 'put him in his place', rather than be a man and leave, which is probably what he'd have done if he hadn't been armed, he did the ultimate stupid and cost a man his life over a fucking parking place...un fucking real.
@Youtube person Well the criminal case wasn't about whether he should've been there or not, it was whether he used self defense in a legal manner which he did.
By the way, these two situations, Rittenhouse and this have absolutely nothing to do with each other besides the fact that someone used a gun and someone died.
@Youtube person can you explain how you know that kyle rittenhouse intentionally put himself into a situation to use his weapon? Did he telepathically convince those men to attack him? Was it that he simply existed in the area with a gun? Do you know that it is legal to stop people who are actively committing a felony? So if someone is looting/rioting those are felony offenses, if you try to stop them you are 100% allowed to do so, and when they violently attack you then you’re allowed to protect yourself.
@Youtube person id argue theres nothing illegal or wrong about trying to stop or prevent the commission of a felony. I could argue that the aggressors shouldn’t have been there. Kyle Rittenhouse was there NOT committing crimes surrounded by people who WERE committing crimes. And he’s in the wrong in your opinion?
@N Lyne if you can confirm visually that the attacker has a knife/gun and ready to use it on you/someone else and there is a threat of loss of life then you can use your handgun. Otherwise it's walking on thin ice and you have to be ready all the time. You're right. It would be worth it to just carry a taser or something. I think anything but a gun would be easier to explain.
I learned that point from Active Self Protection so so important that you are a sane level headed and do everything in your power to avoid confrontation and even when faced with verbal or physical confrontation that you just keep trying to apologise/ take it on the chin or keep trying to move away - better you let someone push you and you just get up and move away than resorting to lethal force - total Discredits the actual purpose of having it which is only for true life or death scenarios
@cjjj e glad i amuse you. Can you tell me which of his points i didnt answer? And of course it wasnt a coincidence, if i were going to be in an area surrounded by violent felons i’d want a rifle too. I still dont see how that makes kyle the instigator in the situation. In my opinion you’re willfully ignorant.
@Josh Bowen so u agree that he left his home with a loaded rifle and crossed state lines with the intention to be violently confrontational, how does that make him any better than these "violent felons" when violence was his first and only resort/intention?
@cjjj e well if you watched any of the case you’d know that he didnt cross state lines with the rifle (which isnt even a crime had he done so), his father lived and kenosha and kyle also worked in kenosha. Hes better than those violent felons because he wasnt committing felonies, and its solely your speculation that he went there with the intention of hurting anyone. He only shot people who were violently attacking him. Him being there with a weapon isn’t provocation, he has a constitutional right to be there with a firearm for his own protection. Please show me the evidence that he went there with the intention of shooting people. And again, possession of a firearm isn’t evidence of someone intending to shoot people.
@Josh Bowen and its solely your speculation that he didn't go there with the intentions of being violently confrontational, what other reason would he have for being right there right then with a loaded weapon on display? Do u think he wanted to have a friendly and peaceful conversation with a rifle slung over his shoulder? What were his intentions seeing as you're so sure it wasn't confrontation and violence?
@cjjj e well im not speculating im just stating the facts as they were layed forward in the case and going off of the evidence. You asking me for evidence that he didnt have certain intentions is asking me to prove a negative. Look up “burden of proof”, when you make a claim the burden to provide evidence is on you. Its not my job to disprove your claim, its your job to prove it. And yes he very well could have had a peaceful interaction with a rifle slung over his shoulder. Someone exercising their second amendment right is not evidence that they are looking for a fight.
@zero8kira In the case of Kyle Rittenhouse the actual perpetrators testified that they did indeed threaten to take Kyle Rittenhouse's life within his earshot while on trial. They denied that fact on the media but they did admit it on trial.
@Youtube person Rittenhouse isn't a vigilante, he was running away, a crowd of people chased him, and he defended himself. You can't say he put himself in that situation when he was literally running away from the situation. Running away from someone is about the most non threatening thing you can do to them
@cjjj e - no, he did NOT “leave his home with a loaded rifle” NOR did his actions recorded earlier in the evening and up to the attacks on him by criminals, display ANY “intent to use it”
You are HORRIBLY mis informed on the sequence of actions and events. I forgive you for that, to the extent that the MSM has been repeating outright lies about the case from the moment it happened.
@Youtube person - starting dumpster fires and threatening the guy who puts them out, before the CRIMINALS could roll it up to the gas pumps in a gas station, is NOT “interrupting a crime in progress?”
@Youtube person Fact is the law and the jury are in Rittenhouse's favor. The fact you don't acknowledge his innocence just goes to show how even cops like you can be ignorant of the law and fail to understand such a basic verdict.
@Youtube person - then you and your compatriots should have refused to stand down while Kenosha burned! Kyle had and has every right to be there, every right to be armed, and every right to defend himself when attacked by CRIMINALS... As we both know, your job does not legally require you to protect and serve... So someone’s gotta do it, and Kyle did more to protect and serve Kenosha than any of the officers “standing down” that riotous evening. But it sounds like you are the type of “just following orders” officer, who would have been with the redcoats, in 1776, and the third reich, during WWII.
I’ll take a single, well armed citizen of righteous morals, over a hundred of you..
@Youtube person kyle rittenhouse was there in the first place because the police (you probably being one of them) weren’t there to stop people from committing felonious crimes. Its a bit moronic to say “kyle rittenhouse shouldnt have been there he should let the police do their jobs and not be a vigilante” meanwhile the police are nowhere to be found while people are creating anarchy. Touch grass.
@Youtube person also funny that you call rittenhouse a “kid” but the prosecutors didnt view him as a kid when they tried him as an adult. I bet money if he was found guilty and sent to prison for life you wouldnt be arguing that hes just a kid. Youd be treating him like an adult and youd be glad hes in prison with other adults.
@Youtube person so a 17 year old kid doesnt have the right to self defense that an 18 year old has? Where does it say that in the law? You swore an oath as a police officer to protect and uphold people’s constitutional rights, you should know that the right to self defense is afforded to people of all ages. Why wasnt the 14 year old who shot the robber in the face arrested and tried as an adult? Because people have the right to protect themselves is why.
@N Lyne What kind of confrontations do find find are necessary? You carry a gun to protect yourself and those immediately around you from deadly force. You avoid using deadly force unless deadly force is brought upon you. If somebody wants a fistfight you try to avoid it at all costs, and if you can't avoid it you use the appropriate amount of force to the force being applied to you. Guy has fists and just punched you? Fight your way out or run away (running is the first option!), but unless you are sure they intend to kill you why would you take their life? If somebody punches someone do they get the death sentence? Should they? I would hope you think not.
@N Lyne depends on the state but Kyle Rittenhouse didn't start any of the conflicts he was involved in unlike this guy who initially started the problem.
@cjjj e the rifle wasn't at Kyle's house and the rifle never crossed state lines... Maybe if you want to pretend to be smart you should learn the facts of the case you are lying about..
Really? I've not heard that particular ethical consideration when it comes to carrying a weapon. That said, I'm Canadian and there are no weapons here except those legally employed for hunting....I wish more people had the same approach as you when it comews to carrying a weapon. The world might be a bit gentler and safer place.
@Looking 4 Things nope, watch the court case. That charge was thrown out because it was not illegal for rittenhouse to have the rifle. More people need to watch the case, and watch less biased lying media, and maybe people wouldn’t be so uninformed.
The black guy was also wrong. Without even enquiring for a second about what's happening, he just push the man to the ground within one second just because the man was arguing with his wife? Who knows what's will happen if he didn't pull out his gun. Everyone commenting and justifying the black guy just because they don't want to sound racist? That's absurd. I'm not on the killer's side, he is guilty no doubt. But the guy who got shot was also definitely on the wrong.
Not saying this guy was justified but tbh this whole situation could’ve been avoided if they just parked legally and it’s even worse when you see all the available spaces they could’ve parked but all in all he shouldn’t have shot at that man
@Herbert West yeah but Drejka isn’t the one dead the point of my comment was to point out how that man could still be alive today had he just parked legally
Revelation 19 After these things I heard as it were the voice of much people in heaven, saying: Alleluia. Salvation, and glory, and power is to our Lord God.
2 For true and just are his judgments, who hath judged the great harlot which corrupted the earth with her fornication, and hath revenged the blood of his servants, at her hands.
3 And again they said: Alleluia. And her smoke ascendeth for ever and ever.
4 And the four and twenty ancients, and the four living creatures fell down and adored Lord God that sitteth upon the throne, saying: Amen; Alleluia.
5 And a voice came out from the throne, saying: Give praise to our Lord God, all ye his servants; and you that fear him, little and great.
6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of great thunders, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord Godd our God the Almighty hath reigned.
7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give glory to him; for the marriage of the Lord God Lamb is come, and his wife hath prepared herself.
8 And it is granted to her that she should clothe herself with fine linen, glittering and white. For the fine linen are the justifications of saints.
9 And he said to me: Write: Blessed are they that are called to the marriage supper of the Lord God Lamb. And he saith to me: These words of Lord God are true.
10 And I fell down before his feet, to adore him. And he saith to me: See thou do it not: I am thy fellow servant, and of thy brethren, who have the testimony of Jesus. Adore God. For the testimony of Lord God Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.
11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called faithful and true, and with justice doth he judge and fight.
12 And his eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many diadems, and he had a name written, which no man knoweth but himself.
13 And he was clothed with a garment sprinkled with blood; and his name is called, THE WORD OF LORD GOD.
14 And the armies that are in heaven followed him on white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
15 And out of his mouth proceedeth a sharp two edged sword; that with it he may strike the nations. And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness of the wrath of Lord God the Almighty.
16 And he hath on his garment, and on his thigh written: KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun, and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the birds that did fly through the midst of heaven: Come, gather yourselves together to the great supper of Lord God:
18 That you may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of tribunes, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all freemen and bondmen, and of little and of great.
19 And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war with him that sat upon the horse, and with his army.
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet, who wrought signs before him, wherewith he seduced them who received the character of the beast, and who adored his image. These two were cast alive into the pool of fire, burning with brimstone.
21 And the rest were slain by the sword of him that sitteth upon the horse, which proceedeth out of his mouth; and all the birds were filled with their flesh.
“On October 10, 2019, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit of 92 days for time served.He is imprisoned at Lancaster Correctional Institution, near Trenton, Florida, where he was attacked and reportedly wounded by another inmate on February 11, 2020.” Couldn’t find it in the comments so here ya go, great vid JCS
There really aren't maximum security prisons in Florida besides union ci and Florida state prison. It just means he was transferred to a prison away from his assailant. But once you are attacked in this manner, or if you are in fear for your life, you get moved to protective custody. Fear would move you to a different unit on the same compound, where as a serious attack will call for a transfer to another compound and being placed in a pc (protective custody) unit.
I'm glad this guy is serving time Because this guy has been looking for people to shoot every day..he was not a cop why in hell He was checking license plates for handicap plates or stickers. Is not even his problem. He was just stocking people
@AlienInDisguise Imagine judging the person instead of looking at the situation itself. It's the same case with zimmerman where everyone just bitches about how much they hate him instead of looking at the actual self defense situation.
@[Todd disliked that] Sure hope you stretched before that reach. This guy literally murdered someone and had threatened 4 people prior with his gun. Did we watch the same video? The situation was over once he pulled his gun. No one had to lose their life. If you’re defending him, you’re sick.
He was in the wrong because the assailant backed away yet he still shot. But there clearly are eased circumstances. The black guy shouldn't have pushed him to the ground.
Yes you are correct. This was the correct outcome of this case. This is one of the reasons why it is incredibly important to be trained and knowledgeable about the law in relation to firearms. I had to defend myself when my oldest son was a baby and in the heat of the moment you are very likely to make a wrong move if you are poorly trained which the suspect clearly was.
Some people should never carry. When the gun goes on, your ego goes off. Good riddance on both ends. Dude was advancing pulling his pants up until he saw his life was ending
I know they’re not criminals, but it would be interesting to do a similar type of analysis video on the psychology of a high profile defense attorney when they know their clients are guilty. His attorney was shaky as hell lol
So, in speaking to some of them...they are trying to make sure the govt does their job and proves the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt...it's not about if their client did it, it's about if the government can prove their client did it...
I imagine they sleep pretty well, considering they're protecting a defendant's right to be presumed innocent unless proven guilty. You know, that little idea that is the fundamental building block or American justice?
@some dudeso is accosting strangers over public parking on multiple occasions . He knew his actions could provoke people which is why he carried a firearm. He said so himself in the video.
Also im pretty sure the victim didn't know he was armed until after he pushed him away from his woman and kids. Hence why he backed away.
@some dude If an armed stranger is yelling at my wife for seemingly no reason, and my young children are in the car, I think I'd be justified to push him out of the way. Plus, this guy was WAITING for someone to "assault" him. He wanted to fire that weapon. He admits himself that he carried a firearm because he would do things like this all the time. Guys like this look for excuses to "be the hero".
@Blkeclipse L I don't think accosting is the right term, he was known to confront people parking in inappropriate places which on the one hand I can commend for the fact that I have had friends and family greatly inconvenienced by inconsiderate people taking the parking designated for those who need while on the other hand I don't think Michael should have been the "Parking Lot Vigilante" he was acting as. I think the prosecutions last statement was the most apt, he was right the brandish the weapon but not to discharge it. The man took it way to far by throwing Michael to the ground, that was over the top and my initial reaction if I were in that position would be that he wanted to seriously injure me. I don't think you can reasonably defend his actions by saying "he didn't know he was armed". And the only thing I could think of the whole time they debated the steps forward was that Michael likely had whiplash from being thrown to the ground thus impairing his perception of the situation.
some dude yeah it’s just totally normal to talk like that. I’m sure it has nothing to do with him larping as the armed protector of a food store, desperately waiting for that one moment in his life where he would finally be able to shoot someone.
@Squid Lounge : Accost: to approach and address (someone) boldly or aggressively. I'd say that's an adequate word to describe his actions .
How is it that you can say Accost isn't the right term but in the same sentence you acknowledge that he was known to "Confront" people ? Confront: to meet (someone) face to face with hostile or argumentative intent.
I am a legal gun owner with a CWP. People like him are the reason why things that go without saying has to be taught in course. Such as carrying a firearm does not give you the clearance to needlessly insert yourself into a situation that may force you to have to use your weapon much less become a provocateur to incite altercation.
He has confirmed that he had no hand to hand combat skills and that he's never been in a fight a day in his life. If he wasn't carrying - he wouldn't have been so bold as to "confront" strangers over public parking. Thus making him more inclined to use a deadly weapon. Which means he knew exactly what he was doing and what could come of it in the event someone challenged his self appointed authority . In short if you can't fight for shit - don't go around starting it . A gun doesn't give you the right to be billy badass - It comes with serious responsibilities and serious consequences.
How you could commend such nonsense is beyond me . From a legal standpoint - Mr. McGlockton shouldn't have pushed him. However I can understand why he did and at the end of the day it made no difference when the judge handed down Drejka's sentencing . When a man sees a random stranger shouting at his woman in the presence of his children it's completely plausible that he will perceive him as a threat and no one knows how a man will react when he thinks you're threatening his family.
@Blkeclipse L I can appreciate the thought process behind what you are saying all except for the last paragraph. Drejka was criticized for not making a verbal warning before firing and yet McGlockton isn't, if McGlockton had called out for instance before causing a violent situation I can't say for certain things would have gone different but I believe it would be more likely. At the end of the day I can not agree with Drejka firing the weapon, but I cannot agree with saying he needlessly accosted people. From the video you can see he didn't take an aggressive stance when speaking to the woman and was said to be a very calm man be people who knew him. No one likes being corrected, which is why I really have to assume the reports of him "accosting" other drivers is exaggerated. I think Drejka was demonized far more than was earned and the sentence they are after is extreme. But I do think it is a good teachable story for people who would like to carry a weapon, fire only when you think a life is at risk if you don't.
@Allison If an armed stranger is yelling at someone, and you assault him, you've fucked up. Because this is what could happen.
There's a word that people need to learn: "deescalation." No one seems capable of it any more, and so we see people getting killed over incredibly petty matters because people appear to feel obliged to take things a step up and make matters worse rather than try to calm people down.
This is foolish, dangerous behavior that needs to stop. If someone is yelling, you need to try to calm them down. Attacking them is the very definition of escalation. Stop it.
@some dude he is using jargon which is usually done to signal your membership in a group. Calling a stipulation a stip is gonna signal to people that you are a lawyer or some sort of legal professional. If you are actually just a dude who watches lots of legal dramas then you're just a dork.
Same goes with him and his use of militaryaw enforcement jargon.
Jhon Famo yes, what happened to honor? You’re never supposed to shoot an unarmed man! He could have just called the police if it bothered his so badly that they were in a handicapped space. It’s not his job to enforce the law.
It’s white knighting. Just having a gun makes people think they are some kind of vigilante, above the law, despite no training. It’s the “good guy with the gun mentality” and it’s dangerous
@Allison There's a world of difference between treating someone with kid gloves and shoving them to the ground. McGlockton could've yelled "hey, get the fuck away from my wife and kids, you mall cop wannabe son of a bitch motherfucker" and that would be been an ultimately better option than what he did. Even the prosecutor stated an argument could be made that Drejka had every right to pull his gun at that moment. This doesn't excuse shooting McGlockton once he had clearly started to back up, obviously.
There needs to be better training when it comes to firearms. I believe Drejka genuinely thought he was in the right. That's why he was so forthcoming with the police, and why he failed to speak with an attorney first. There's a great deal of responsibility when it comes to owning a firearm, and Drejka clearly failed to display any responsibility here.
I feel so sorry for that sweet baby, he had to see his dad drop dead in front of him. The audacity of this man to play victim when he started it is astounding.
It is extremely sad. The guy definitely did not deserve to die. Unfortunately, this sad tale reinforces something I believe in: Always think twice before laying your hands on people on the street. You can be morally in the right. But you can never tell if someone is a crazy with a gun. A scumbag parks in a handicapped zone. Another scumbag takes issue with it being wrong and/or illegal and mouths off to the lady in the car. Mr. Outraged runs up and physically accosts Drejka. And, in this case, the guy attacked pulled out a gun and killed him. Doesn't matter what the right and wrong was when you're dead.
He does it to dehumanize his victim. “Neutralize” in place of murder. “Threat” instead of anything to say he killed another man. Considering how calm he is talking about ending someone’s life over a handicap spot shows how effective it was for him. It’s honestly crazy how much time he has to discern that this man is no longer a threat. Considering how much he pats himself on the back for beings so “firearm trained”
Was thinking the exact same thing. "Holstered my weapon" "altercation" "21 foot rule" he's trying to gain the respect of the police by using their terminology. The guy watches too many cop shows...
Cop language or military language. He sounds like someone who has delusions of being in some kind of armed organisation. He reminds me a bit of that Jeremy Whateverhisnameis who is a serial police impersonator.
This guy was just looking for a fight. There was absolutely no justification for this shooting. So they were illegally parked, the video says that Drejka was also illegally parked. Man, the confrontation over a handicap placard is just stupid. I’m glad he got 20 years for this. That man should have never lost his life over something so trivial.
@vocal procrastinating yeah I never once implied it was justified. But it does go to show that you'd be better off taking a second to make sure it's worthwhile before you assault someone for yelling. Right or wrong between either of them, that guy wound up shot. There were several ways either party could have de-escalated that situation and they both failed at every opportunity.
Also, you apparently don't understand what premeditated means.
@Jarrad Pechie I think it’s pretty obvious that he shouldn’t have pushed the guy, but i think we all agree it’s very obvious the guy took it to a whole new level of escalation by pulling out a gun.
@Jarrad Pechie It's weird bc your same logic applies to the murderer. You should never approach strangers and yell/ become aggressive with them bc you don't know if they will become violent. That's the problem with vigilantes. Seeing someone commit a minor traffic violation shouldn't lead to you confronting and screaming at a random stranger. Had he not done two lives and two families would have been saved.
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge I have a hard time calling someone who bitches somebody out for parking in a handicap spot a "vigilante." Any of that aside, he was totally in the wrong for shooting a retreating man and the jury reflected that. It's already a non-variable that doesn't need highlighting. My comment was based on the fact that shoving someone to the ground over a verbal confrontation might just end your life, which I don't think is being examined enough. Like it or not, Marquis was the initial aggressor in this situation. People have public disagreements with strangers all the time. It doesn't give you license to go around shoving people.
@Jarrad Pechie well, then I supposed that's where I have to leave the conversation. You think of it as mere “bitching” to me it was a sign of aggression. And with any sign of aggression, you never know if the other guy will take it to a ten. Ppl violate minor traffic laws all the time it doesn't mean you get to display signs of aggression towards them.
@Jarrad Pechie as a final note, we are actually making the same point. I would just like you to apply that same logic to the gunman. Nonphysical aggression is well studied in the social psychology of mammals. Verbal aggression is one of the most common types in most mammals. Imagine for a moment a pit bull is in front of you growling and barking, you would take that as a sign of aggression. You might believe he is ready to attack you. Perhaps you might even attempt to strike it as a response or some other way to chase it away...
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge pitbulls don't understand complex ideas or emotions that humans can employ to resolve conflict. Not an apt comparison. All Marquis had to do is walk up and say "Whoa what's the problem here man?" and I guarantee Drejka would have tucked tail and ran or at least calmed his tone. Instead he immediately resorted to physical violence and got killed. It's too bad that we can't ask him if it was worth it.
@Jarrad Pechie animals tend to respond instinctually when meeting aggression. Even humans. Do you deny that yelling is a sign of aggression? (a quick google search will show that psychologists say it is). If not, then based on your logic above, the shooter was the initial aggressor and thus began the unnecessary cycle of aggression. No, but we can ask the gunman, I bet he wishes he’d never become aggressive with that woman
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge so you're saying that humans are no better than animals with regard to the ability to reason? Yelling may be an aggressive act, but even in the eyes of the law it doesn't by itself present a clear and present danger for which you're authorized to assault someone.
@Jarrad Pechie there are millions of cases that prove humans reason terribly pretty often 😂 this case is one of them.
We weren't talking about the law though, were we? The law was already used to decide the case. The murderer was convicted. We were talking about your logic, your argument. And you have just admitted that the victim was not the initial aggressor. All the other acts were a result of that initial aggression. Therefore the surest way to avoid this all would have been for the murderer to not have acted aggressively in the first place.
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge my logic is based on the law. If you feel any differently, I encourage you to start shoving anyone who raises their voice and see hiw that works out for you.
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge lol gloat all you want. Your argument is based on humans lacking the ability to reason and therefore somehow excusing them from culpability. It's absurd and flimsy.
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge and let's be real clear here: your argument is basically "talk shit get hit," which is not exactly surprising to me. Wonder where you'd land if there was a little bit of role reversal in this situation.
@Jarrad Pechie wrong. My argument and your argument are one and the same. Being aggressive is stupid and should be avoided, as it leads to situations like this. We agree. You are just so biased that even though you admit the murderer was the initial aggressor you refuse to apply the logic to him as well.
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge I didn't ever say he was the initial aggressor. Initializing a disagreement isn't in and of itself aggressive, and it in no way justifies assault. If Drejka hadn't have shot his attacker, he could have easily pressed charges on him.
@Jarrad Pechie you admitted that yelling was an act of aggression. Therefore making the shooter the initial aggressor. It's amusing watching you tiptoe around what you want to say. Why would you believe I'm okay with “Talk shit get hit?”. After I've blatantly said I think aggressive actions led to other aggressive acts, after I've said I found it stupid to do so. What a curious assumption 🤔
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge actually the initial act of aggression was the woman parking in a handicap spot. In cases where the law is broken and there is no material victim, the state is held as the victim, therefore she committed an act of aggression against the state. Regardless, Marquis was the initiator of violence. A needless escalation of the situation that cost him his life because he was unable to control himself. Sad.
@Jarrad Pechie by no definition of the word aggression does that make any sense. No human would take that as a sign of aggression. Which is a “readiness to attack or confront” according to modern dictionaries 😂😂 you really are terrible at this. A person can commit a crime against the State, never in U.S history has any lawyer or judge said “This person committed aggression against the State” 😂😂😂Nice job ignoring my other question. Why you you think that about me ?. Let's leave it here buddy ✌️🏽
@Jarrad Pechie if you weren't blinded by your own bias you would realize I have agreed with you that aggression leads to escalation. The shooter aggressively yelled. His push led to the escalation of aggression, the shot. Ahh he wasn't a boy Jarrad, he was man.
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge you are incapable of admitting that Marquis was in the wrong for pushing him. Yelling at someone- and we don't even know if he was yelling- isn't a crime, and responding to it with physical violence IS a crime. This nonsense tale that you're trying to spin of the man being outside of the control of his faculties and therefore excused of his role is fantasy. Even the prosecutor said that Drejka was justified in DRAWING his gun, which an intelligent person would only be to conclude would be because he was unexpectedly attacked for no good reason. Drejka did nothing illegal or warranting of physical violence until he pulled the trigger.
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge I have let it go. I wasn't replying to you. I'm not going to bother with someone who thinks repeating the same nonsense over and over means they've won.
0 likes
Rob Oc2022-05-17 13:08:15 (edited 2022-05-17 13:08:54 )
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge Your arguments are weak tbh. The blatant bias your showing(and we all know why) is incredible. Words aren't violence no matter how you spin it. Shouting, loud speaking etc none of it's violence. I live in a country that would call out the mother's incredible ignorance and arrogance. That's the first mistake in this story. I can already tell you won't look at this objectively purely because of skin color. The first, FIRST...act of violence was by the father. You don't get to put your hands on someone because of words. Yes, to some extend I disagree with the subsequent response but let's not get it twisted who started and escalated the situation.
@Jarrad Pechie She's obviously obsessed and bias to some extend. You were talking to me but she felt the need to respond. She seems emotionally invested too. Sad.
He is so proud of what he did. Manslaughter is ridiculous! The victim retreated and he murdered the man after being pushed. The guy should not have pushed him, but he didn't deserve to die behind it.
Murder charges are a lot harder to prove because they’d have to prove premeditation. He still got 20 years and manslaughter charges were a slam dunk case vs murder charges.
At 29:32 the police officer asks this murderer, "What were his (the victim's) hands doing?" And "Were you able to see them, were you able to see the guy's hands?" The lying murderer responds, "I have no clue." While simultaneously repeating the exact hand gesture that his victim demonstrated before he gunned him down in cold blooded first degree MUR-ER-DER .
And at 39:30, just after the murderer cries about missing his dogs (not about him being the only reason his victim's children will NEVER see their father again) the interviewer asks this murderer if there was anything that he would change. And the cold blooded murderer actually said no!!!!!!
@Looking 4 Things I think it was called a joke, they spelled murderer wrong. Ryan jokingly asked what a Murerder is. Get over yourself will you? Thanks.
You got to respect the officer he was leading him to at least say “he was in fear for his life” and it never crossed this idiots mind! He was looking for trouble and trouble he found! Blessings for the family that’s suffering 🙏and the victimMarquise 😇 All because some loser wanted to play cowboi🤠💥💥..Truly sad, the whole situation, thank god Mr Drejka 🗣 talked himself into jail that’s the best part 😂😂of the whole unfortunate day…
As a european, I just started to grasp the full effect of american gun laws after binge watching JCS vids. I could not walk the streets peacefully, when every idiot could possibly carry a gun on him.
These cases are invaluable to concealed weapons carriers. Some people like to talk tough about how they handle themselves in rough neighborhoods, but everyone needs to know the weapon in the last resort, not the initial response.
You can talk to the police and just answer every question with "I'm not sure." There was one murder case where this wife of a killer does was say "I'm not sure." And the detectives would get frustrated and say "It's a yes or no question" And she replies with "I'm not sure." LOL The detectives were trying to figure out if she help her husband cover his crime so they can charge her. But because all she says is "I'm not sure." they can't pin her on anything. LOL She did this without any lawyer.
@Walden dont do that, dont say anything without a lawyer present. If they offer water say nothing and dont drink it. If they ask how the weather is say nothing. Say nothing. Say absolutely nothing except "I want a/my lawyer."
Just seeing him wait over 5 seconds after pulling his gun to shoot shows he wasn’t in fear of his life. He thinks he’s a vigilante but In reality he’s a villain
This man had many other options then to shoot. Pulling out that gun was not where he was in the wrong, it was firing the gun at the man that was the problem. He should have pulled it out and warned the man that if he got any closer he would fire or he should fire a warning shot (he should have a blank on the first round that way no one else gets severely hurt if he messes up the warning shot) He had so many other options and I think especially if he stated that he didn't even fear for his life he should have not shot that man.
This guy was looking for trouble the minute he pulled in the lot. Circling the woman’s car looking for a handicap sticker so that he could start some shit. And look what It got you buddy!! You have/had NO right to take a life over a scraped elbow!
It's really interesting to see him complain about his arms, when they leave - he isn't really showing any signs of discomfort or soreness but soon as an officer comes back in, "left hand, left hand" and acts like he is in complete discomfort, again.
To de-escalate a problem that can get physical he could’ve apologize (regardless of what they were doing,he was in no business to enforce a parking issue) mind his own business and go upon the rest of his day. But his idea of de-escalating a problem he created is to k1ll the man?? That was someone’s child,that was someone parent (who also witnessed it all)..the complete disregard of life is insane,all over a parking spot.Yeah I see people that use those spots to wait on someone,or hop out looking completely capable but it ain’t my business..people have disabilities that aren’t visible and they can very well have an issue I do not see so I do not bother them and keep to myself. This guy thought he could use the stand your ground law as excuse to start crap with people and not receive the consequences.
That sheriff gave Drejka the shovel and Drejka dug a grave so goddamn deep. The epitaph would read, "He never said a word."
The sheriff handled this beautifully. He set up Drejka time and time again to essentially confess to murdering someone aaaaaand Drejka was none the wiser.
Well, it followed the line that what he said.. he did what he had to do. So it was on the the deceased's his own death (according to his point of view)
@StoutJudas guess what? families with young kids do this stuff sometimes. it's not bullying. it's called.. tired.. taking a short cut.. . not right .. but hardly crime of the century
@Eva-Imogene Wharehoka Friend Eva. I didn't call it a "Crime of the century" nor was it justified gunning down the guy with the anger issues. I just find those people extremely annoying.
@StoutJudas nobody cares if you find them extremely annoying. i just hope you realise that you’re infact sitting here trying to justify this man shooting a father.
@StoutJudas then why are you sitting here acting like you are? because absolutely nobody cares that you think its «extremely annoying» that people who arent handicapped parks in the handicap spot, because it really had nothing to do with this
In the interview at end of video the shooter is to dimwitted to realize he is being setup when interviewer ask him if there was anything about that day he could change what would it be? He's focusing on the specific mechanics of the incident from the point of view you can't change what has already happened rather than if you had the whole incident to do over. It is stated that he had 4 previous altercations with strangers in the past 18 months and did not have the capacity, such as fist fighting, to defend himself. It does lead one to believe when he holsters that Glock 40 he also holsters an attitude with it. None of this negates the fact that a younger, stronger and physically bigger individual initiated a physical confrontation violently shoving him to the ground. His biggest mistake was not (1.) requesting to go to the hospital to document injury to arm, (2.) not speaking to police until he obtained an attorney and(3.) waiting 72 hours, as police all across the country do after a police involved shooting, before speaking with the police. When you are in a police interrogation room the police are not your friends no matter. How friendly they may seem.
Lesson to be learned here: don’t put hands on someone (you might get shot) and don’t shoot someone because of a confrontation/assault unless you’re in imminent danger.
What kind of psychological test do you have to go thru to get a permit to carry a gun in the US? Seems like none by the look of the interview of this video.
The scary thing is that Michael seemed to be sure he will get away with that. Hell, he might even truly believed that. The second scary thing is, that, without a CCTV, he possibly would have been right with that assumption.
@Meep Meep that's what I thought immediately after seeing him purposely pick a fight over a parking spot. he probably thought he could cry self defense when he shot and killed the guy when he provoked him into pushing or hitting him. what a despicable human being this guy is...
The 3rd scary thing is how indifferent he acts when given the news that he's just uhhh idk TAKEN SOMEONES LIFE!! I'd hope that any sane person (as I would be personally) would be beside themselves learning this if they truly were simply trying to defend themselves...but that was never Michael's intention, all along he simply wanted to hurt, kill and get revenge. Sick!
Do you blame him for thinking he’d get away with it? The police murder unarmed black men with impunity all the time. He probably thought they’d deputize him on the spot.
@Meep Meep yep. One of those lunatics who fantasize about being in a situation where they can use justifiable homicide as a defense. George Zimmerman Jr.
The cops tried to let him get away with it. The local sheriff declared he couldn't be jailed because of stand-your-ground laws in a public press conference. It's only when the district attorney decided to charge the man with manslaughter that he got taken off the streets.
No, it couldnt have stayed a verbal fight, because drejka wouldve 10% pulled his gun no MATTER what marquice did or said, he was literally KNOWN for doing that.
once he pulled the gun, and had the target zero'd in...there was no reason to pull the trigger. you HAVE TO respect the power you possess in your hands. you have the situation completely deescalated...BACK AWAY AND CALL 911 UNLESS THERE IS ANOTHER GUN BEING DRAWN!!!!!!!!!!
why did the detective ask if his arm was broken when he was brought in? was that just a “wanna seem friendly” or was he just genuinely nice or is there a legal reason they have to check his health?
20 years for: cold-blooded killing of an unarmed young father defending his family who had started backing away once this guy pulled a gun on him was an insult and unjustifiable. This guy then overplayed his right hand injury, lied that Markeis McGlockton was advancing towards him and that was why he shot him. The video clearly showed Markeis backing away. I don't care about any idiot who might question my personal opinion, but I've wondered so many times about what the outcome would've been had the roles been reversed and it was Markeis who had shot and killed this man in the same manner. I bet the sentence would've been much heavier, and the treatment by the cops would've been so much different from the car park, through these interviews to the Court as we have seen them treat this guy. Incidentally, when this self-appointed car park attendant approached Britani Jacobs's car, he himself was parked illegally.
He didn't have to shoot him. He could've threatened him with the gun until he left him alone, or he could have shot him in the foot to keep him away. He deserve 20 years in prison this was not out of self defense this is murder!
foot has veins... bad idea aiming with a gun isn't easy on such a small target which would make him shoot the leg.. a problem even worse than the first one
Emboldened by the Zimmerman verdict. He ran into trouble when “his store” had his derrière on camera.Otherwise he walks in Florida, regardless of his truly self damning statements. Never forget Trayvon.
"Shoot just the once, no reason to go overboard" yeah right, you really took a step back and recollected yourself SMH and then they say have a tendency to get hysterical!
If you can sit there on the ground for a couple seconds, slowly pull up your shirt to grab your gun, and then point the gun for 2 seconds before finally firing while the “threat” stands three feet away from you backing up. It’s pretty safe to assume they’re not an immediate threat anymore and were clearly just pissed off you were screaming at their wife. After the push, I can honestly bet nothing worse was going to happen had the man not pulled out his gun instantly.
Though, I think his tears when his dogs are brought up, are actually of compassion, he is a racist. You don't need to express "green eggs and ham" if your comfortable when it comes to black people. You just say "you're not racist", period!
now imagine the scenario if gun wasn't so easily accessible to the general population.........they would both survive maybe with bruises and maybe broken ribs if they got into a big fight............but they would be alive.
I have a disabled parking placard. When you get one, you get a paper with helpful info. It states that your physical status is between you and the police. You are only obligated to produce the placard when a police officer asks for it. Because of all that, it really pisses me off when people try to police the disabled parking spaces. If you must cause a problem for someone parked in a disabled space, call the police. Let them deal with it.
Find Me there’s absolutely no reason to think he would’ve attacked a cop. This guy was arguing with the man’s wife, he was concerned for his wife and family’s safety. It would’ve been a very different scene if he emerged from the store to see his wife calmly talking to a cop,
it's against the law to ask WHY someone is disabled, if you have the legally required materials, they are required by law to leave you alone... learn your rights
This lawyer for Drejka is DAF! Nobody in their right mind would celebrate something like that, especially during a MURDER interview! Drekja is guilty AF! Bury him under the prison
@Jack Burton Don't start confrontations if getting knocked over once makes you feel the need to kill in order to protect yourself. Guy was clearly looking for a reason to draw his gun, and any person mature enough to carry can see that.
edit: Oh, and he got charged. So clearly the justice system agrees with what I said.
Let's see how you react if you get knocked down and someone is standing over you. Situations like that easily devolve into getting your head beaten to a bloody pulp, kicks, punches to the face included, brain damage imminent. How about just don't assault anyone, period. Really not that hard.
@Intimacy well play by play the dude wasn't walking towards him after the shove and then he pulled a gun again nothing too wrong at this point and then he points it at him for around 2 seconds before firing durring this time the man is clearly backing up and is clearly unarmed he just isn't a threat anymore
@Intimacy or maybe don’t think you’re the handicap parking hero and start harassing people for no reason? He had more than enough time to think and not shoot. The man froze when he saw the gun, he just wanted to shoot him. Probably waiting his entire life for the moment.
@Taco King Normally when people are hostile, they don’t tend to back off from whomever they confront after the hit. Usually after a shove anyone with malice intent would’ve continued their assault with a flurry of blows. He was not a threat at all, especially not with a gun in his face.
@Taco King Because a single gunshot would be all it would take to end his life, and both parties were clearly aware of that. If you whip out a pistol and your unarmed opponent backs up and you think they’re still a threat, you must be a paranoid nutjob. “Well for all I knew he was the fucking juggernaut and would tank my bullets as he magically accelerated forward.”
@Taco King to be a threat and a deadly threat are 2 different things and to pull a gun and fire it are 2 different things as well. If i get blindsided and fall to the ground i may pull out a gun and threat to shoot if the attacker continues but if he is unarmed and take 3.5 steps back i have the situation under controll and there is no threat. I become the threat. Now the right thing would be to talk and relax the situation, call the police, and press charges on the attscker with assault. Not kill him.
@Taco King I’ll leave a time stamp for you to see the flaw in this as well. 2:26 the shooter is beginning to draw. Seeing him draw, the man who attacker is now backing away literally covering his body defensively. There is a 2 second period between shots. If this isn’t Billy Badass trying to look for an excuse to shoot somebody, then why didn’t he just stand up, keep the gun trained on him, and call the police? Instead of doing this, he aims after fumbling with the holster, registers where’s he’s aiming and actively fires a lethal shot. Again, why not just shoot the shoulder or leg if you are going to “fire for self defense”. He had plenty of time to do so.
@Taco King You’re still not recognizing the fact that if Markeis really wanted to hurt this guy, why would he give him anytime to reach for anything to begin with? Why not just beat Drejka to a pulp? Maybe it’s because he didn’t see this situation worth pursuing anymore altercation and decided to take a reprieve and wait for Drejka’s next move to decide what to do. Oh well, I guess the only proper thing to do when someone pushes you is too 𝑓𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚.
@Taco King “hyperviolent”. When he saw him draw the gun he backed up. If Drejka wasn’t an utter idiot he wouldn’t have started that confrontation in the first place. Sure, Markeis overreacted but are you telling me seriously with as much macho aura you radiate if someone was aggressively barrading your wife with little context you’d not do the same thing he did? Put yourself in Markeis’s shoes. His life wasn’t indanger he fell over lol. He himself said he just had some scrapes and bruises. Compared to what poor Markeis got, who wasn’t even armed btw, he seems to have got off fine. If anything, I’d say Drejka is hyperviolent here. He’s the one who turned a push to the ground into a lethal gunshot wound.
@Taco King Also, if someone were to be an actual threat to your life. You wouldn’t take 5 seconds to think before shooting them. You would immediately start dumping rounds into them. Drejka knew this guy wasn’t a threat, he just wanted to take this man’s life.
@Jack Burton when he feel over the guy who shoved him didn’t jump on top of him or anything. Even when he pulled the gun for a solid 2-3 seconds he didn’t do anything. He killed him to protected his honor
@Christopher just watched the vid and the victim pulled up his pants before shoving then took two steps toward the shooter and was pulling up his pants again but started backing away when he saw a gun. The shooter definitely did not need to shoot but the victim was definitely planning on making his battery charge worth it by doing some more damage.
Yeah no, it's not murder, it's manslaughter. It wasn't premediated and it's not like he pulled the gun on the guy in the middle of an argument, which would be 2nd degree.
@valko ki To be clear, he only backed away AFTER the gun was being drawn. The BEST case scenario here would be if the guy drew his gun, guy backed up and then he just kept it on him until police came and arrested the other guy. Pulling out the gun was 100% warranted because he DEFINITELY was about to get his ass beat, that much at least is not a lie. The problem is the shooting part.
@Ryan Scott sure I can agree that if the person didn't have the gun he might have gotten seriously injured I just don't agree he should have taken the shot and I feel very bad for the children I think best case scenario he pulls the gun he backs off and then calls the police and then the man who got shot instead gets arrested for assault or battery
@Taco King At this point you’re irredeemable. I see so much bias in your language it’s unbelievable when you say shit like “𝑏𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 shoved“ and “𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑛 to the ground“. I have one final question for you, and I’ll be done with this entire argument. Do you think that the courts were correct in charging Drejka with manslaughter? Yes or No.
@Taco King because as soon as he saw the him reaching for the gun he starts backing up and then from about about 2:30 he is pointing his gun at him and then at 2:32 is when the shot is fired this whole time the man is backing up there isnt a reason to shoot, now let's say when he was pointing a gun at him he was still going towards him or maybe he was going for his pockets for a possible weapon then sure that's justified but he was clearly backing away and then he lied to detectives saying he was still approaching which means he knows he was in the wrong
@Taco King that wasn't self defense lmfao. i'm not defending markeis because he's in the wrong too. nigga was asking to get shot if he was picking petty fights like that. but if you're the owner of a gun, you have a responsibility to use it, well, responsibly. you ever heard of the lines "with great power comes great responsibility"? drejka was not in a life or death situation, nor was markeis a threat to him. if anything drejka should've called the police so that things could've been handled from there. he's in the wrong for trying to take "justice" into his own hands. if you are in possession of a gun, you need to act like the bigger person in a situation. do not try to escalate things, and do not use a gun for petty things like being pushed down. hell, you can visibly see markeis walk away after pushing him down. he wasn't going to back to attack him (unless maybe if drejka retaliated) this is clearly not a case of self defense
@Leeroy Jenkins No doubt. I don’t think anyone is saying he was right in shoving him, but the escalation of the situation on Drejka’s part is completely unnecessary. Not the draw, but the shot.
@Taco King “Stepping towards him like he was going to stomp Drejka’s head in...” The over exaggeration is damn near poetry. Are you Drejka himself? You sure know how to 𝕖𝕤𝕔𝕒𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕖 𝕖𝕧𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕤.
@Taco King All you gotta say is that you’re biased bro... 😌 I’m not defending Markhies on the shove. I’m not attacking Drejka on the draw. The shot is where everything takes a turn. And in my eyes, and many others. You are defending a manslaughter. I’m not here for name calling or none of that. But, to sit here and defend some shit like this. That’s wild. 🤣
@Taco King lets think about this rationally. Drejka has just started a confrontation with someone over a parking space. Markeis comes over and pushes him down. The adverbs you put before this, do not matter. He was pushed down. Markeis takes a step towards him. Looking at the entire scenario, either Drejka must have provoked Markeis’ wife to an extreme degree or Markeis was simply threatening Drejka. Drejka, then, pulls out a gun. Markeis takes a couple steps backwards and seems to flinch at Drejka pulling out the gun. Drejka fumbles with the gun for a second before firing at Markeis’ midsection. The moment Drejka had the gun out, he was no longer a victim. Markeis had stepped back trying to de-escalate the situation. What may have called for Drejka to fire, is if Markeis ran at Drejka after he pulled the gun. It would’ve only been justified then as he would’ve still been a threat.
@Taco King Do you really think that living in a society where people park in handicapped spaces and people get pushed is worse than a society where people are shot over parking spaces. I have legitimately been pushed harder than Drejka playing flag football in middle school. I don't understand how you could possibly consider this situation self-defense.
@Taco King He did not launch him "like 5 feet" you called out someone for exaggerating how many seconds it was, so why are you doing the same? Also are you going to ignore that Drejka used the fact he had a firearm to make threats 3 times between 2012-2028?
@Taco King 36:55 literally talks about how he pulled the gun on other people…but okay. If I walked outside seeing my wife in an altercation with my kids in the car I wouldn’t know what to think. Like I don’t know what he is doing to them or saying to them.
@Taco King You have been using biased language: animal, hyperviolent/aggressive, brutally shoved, flung 5 feet, aggressively walked.
After the shove he wasn't running, he wasn't jumping on him, his body language didn't show he was mid attack; he slowly walked while pulling up his pants. Going from body language, he was either going to stand over him or wait and see his response.
@Taco King You do realize that is unacceptable, right? He stopped and began to move away from Drejka before the firearm was completely drawn and aimed.
The things you're saying are not acceptable as self defense or proper gun usage. You should also understand that he was hit in the lower side, not around the center of the stomach or chest. The former further shows that he was turning and moving away when the shot was fired.
Please never buy a gun because you will most definitely shoot someone at the slightest bit of a physical altercation. Like your not going to give any warnings or see if they're backing off. That also reminds me that Drejka never gave any warning.
I'm not here to protect the perpetrator, but if he had intended to kill the victim then he would not have shot just once but several times. He had enough time to shoot several times because he had him in his sights the whole time, even after the first shot. To me it looked like he wanted to push him back so he didn't shoot again. A murderer would either have fired a fatal shot directly or shot several times. I just wanted to say that because many here omit these facts completely.
@Taco King 2:28 - 2:32 Markeis is backing up. The situation was deescalating and Markeis was stepping away. He could have very easily just kept the gun trained, stood up and not shot. Why was killing him necessary? There is a 4 second window of opportunity before he shoots. The reason I’m stating this is murder not manslaughter is due to the fact he’s got 4 seconds of thought and time to simply put the weapon away. He would have been in the right here had he just called the police and told them to stay at the situation. Instead, he used that 4 seconds to kill a man over a handicap parking spot. A true American hero.
@Aidan Davis He wasn't shot over a parking space, he was shot for attacking someone and making that person feel like his life was in danger. Saying shot over a parking space is a lie, which you're using to manipulate the narrative and you know it. Be real. Also, getting pushed hard while playing football in middle school isn't an attack, it's part of a game. Are you saying these men were playing football so it's fine that the victim got pushed? They're two entirely different situations you're again trying to conflate.
@Baby He wasn't 'doing' anything to them, he was just standing there. Bringing physicality into it makes your 'saying to them' comment less dumb so you used it to make it seem like the man was a threat for just talking to the attacker's wife. Attacking someone for saying something you don't like is clearly stupid, so you're trying to make out the man was doing something to them too, which he clearly wasn't, he was just standing there, so what's your argument?
@Grilled Leeks Telling someone not to park in a handicapped parking spot is not instigating conflict unless the person you're saying it to is extremely mentally unstable and thinks physical violence is an adequate response. In which case, physical violence is an adequate response to the physical violence, which is what happened. Don't turn things physical if you don't want to be physically injured as a result. Logic.
@Puchowska anyone who actually watched the video can see how he instigated it, plus he has a history of it. If you dont know the details why are you typing?
@Puchowska I wasn’t making an argument I was talking about myself because I have anxiety and tend to over think…that’s why I said I wouldn’t know what to do. I know he shouldn’t have pushed him and the guy also shouldn’t have shot him.
@Alexander Chess really he could have just avoid killing someone by pointing the gun because he started to go back but he shoot him if he is that scared shoot his leg
@Intimacy yeah except that wasn’t what was happening. This wasn’t a case where the guy was on top of him the whole time or even a sense of desperation. He got knocked down, the guy was a good distance away. The guy just killed the other dude because he was embarrassed.
@Intimacy Imagine if he had pepper spray instead, the guy seeing it if he gave a warning would probably disengage and even if he didn't his life wouldn't be lost
"Got shoved and fell over", funny how you try to put blame for other man's aggressive actions on the victim of these actions, as if it's his fault that he fell to the ground from applied force. Your bias is seen miles away.
@Jack Burton He put himself in that situation thinking he was a cop out enforcing the law. After he was shoved there was no follow up assault, he decided to commit murder out of anger. I think he felt brave because he had a gun and felt entitled to take it upon himself to enforce the law.
@Intimacy Stop your non sense, this dude committed murder. First of all, he should not be acting like he is a law enforcement officer out enforcing the law and then get into a verbal argument with that woman. Second, the victim should not have pushed him but the victim did not follow up with kicks or punches. As a matter a fact once this murderer pulled out his weapon the victim actually backs away, it's on video in case you didn't see. He should of called the cops but this turd was already predisposed to this type of behavior.
No, he was assaulted and outnumbered by people who were clearly violent and possibly armed. The illegal handicapped parking attacker did not even try to engage in conversation
@Grilled Leeks The justice system obviously didn't work here. I was against him at the start, then on the fence, then completely on his side towards the end. He did nothing wrong like wtf was the Jury thinking? and THIRTY YEARS? For a 2 second mistake? Its not like he kept shooting. He only shot once. This is just so stupid to me. Why does it matter he started to move away? He just SHOVED HIM, without ANY reason. "Protecting family" my ass. He was just talking to them.
Honestly.. its clear that everyone underneath this thread has certain opinions about what is deemed “a threat” and not. And although, I have my own it’s quite frustrating to see that.. why don’t we all just mind our own damn business so this does not have to happen anyways. Like everyone’s really arguing over the fact someone tried to do a good deed but in reality the kind of world we live in. Maybe there’s a different way you can go about positivity, but that’s just me. Mind our own business and live. Never had to be this complicated
He shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
@Taco King If he was defending himself, he would have pulled out the gun, seen the guy backing away, and then not shot and called 911. Do you think an unarmed guy would decide to tackle a guy pointing a gun at him point blank. This isn’t a “court wants to blame white people” issue.
@Puchowska I'm allowed to use examples to prove a point. He may have felt his life was in danger, but that doesn't give him a free pass to kill someone. It's obvious on the video that his life wasn't actually in danger, that's why he was sentenced and in jail for killing somebody. He wasn't in the right.
@Taco King what is wrong with you, he killed someone because he was pushed not punched not shot not stabed pushed and markeis was clearly backing of once the gun was drawn yet drejka still shot.
@valko ki You need to understand what an escalation is. When people are yelling, adrenaline is pumping. When you get knocked over, you are in a vulnerability situation. The victim wanted to de-escalate the situation and did so by asserting his power over the situation and knocked the guy with a gun down. Backing away doesn't matter. He escalated the situation. Doesn't means he "deserved" to die. No one "deserves" anything. The point is if you want to de-escalate a situation, don't escalate it.
@Dax Ratbone Calling Whites for everything they do "racist" makes you racist. Sorry but whenever a white person does something, it is directly racist, but the fact that whites are immediately referred to as such is also racist towards whites. Skin color shouldn't matter, we are all human.
@Mr abd The guy who was shot never said anything and just run towards the other one without him seeing the guy cuz he was out of his sight. Imagine someone does that to you what would you think while you are falling to the ground? Well he thought he get punched or something or worse. I don't think to shot someone is a good thing but it was his instinct at that point. He shot him one time, not several time otherwise he would've thought he wants to kill the other guy with several shots.
@R B that's only first degree, 2nd degree doesn't require premeditated but this was still not 2nd or even 3rd degree murder. Manslaughter fits it perfectly.
@valko ki Well how about writing like a adult instead of insulting someone you don't know, huh? I'll ignore everything else what is coming from you from now on have a nice day.
True, but nobody has the right to push somebody that hard on the street also. Without having asked what the trouble is about. I do not think he got what he deserves but he provoked it.
@vocal procrastinating It was a cold-hearted murder by a narcissist who shows no remorse for his actions, better (or worse) yet he actually feels proud of what he has done to ''protect and serve''. But you can't deny that the push was kinda unneeded at the moment. It was mostly justified, he saw his girlfriend getting yelled at so he obviously, like any loving man, jumped in to protect her, but immediately going for a push is not the first thing you should go for. Regardless of whether the push was needed or not, that heartless jackass will be spending 20 years in jail. And seeing what a little coward he is, I'm sure he is getting his ass handed to him in prison. One comment said he already got folded by another inmate on Fab 11 2020, so at least life is giving him a little bit of the karma he deserves.
@Holly Hope it really isn’t hard to grasp why a man witnessing his significant other (with their children in the car with them) being confronted by an aggressive stranger would go and respond with aggression.
@Victoria Pitts Well, I live in Germany. But I have also been to the States for a year. And there are significant differences in mentality and behavior. "Open" agression you do not find as often as in the States, also racism and for sure NO GUNS. Nobody (few expeptions) is allowed to own a gun or carry around. If somebody gets shot here you know it is a motor gang or the mafia ;-) Regards from Berlin!
All because this clown couldn't just mind his own business. 2 tough guys, one armed, one just younger and bigger. Her bf had absolutely no right to just walk straight up and assault him as he did, normal reasonable people are able to talk before resorting to violence. And likewise the shooter had absolutely no right to fire his weapon, he was in no danger, ego bruised, just producing the pistol was probably unwarranted at that time
Lol this fool “I looked around to make sure there weren’t any more threats” 😂 He’s such a cringe poser. And at 1:17 when the detective asks what he does when he finds/doesn’t find wheelchair placards, he can tell the questions aren’t really going his way so he puts his arms on the table and forgets all about his “injury”, the one so bad he had to tie it up with his shirt and shake hands using his left side. This is too fun to watch 🤣
He's going to get lessons in fighting without a glock. Why wasn't that premeditated murder? He was warned not to do it. He plans it by looking for it, with a gun. He stalks the area. What exactly were his movements that day? Then he ambushes a woman and children. Shoots and kills a fleeing man. Something I saw was the gun follow Marquis as he retreated to the store. He has no record, yet there are other people including women and children he threatened with a gun. I don't get that part. imho this is murder and who says he has just not been caught for other crimes? He knew he was on camera and there was a witness, so of course he would wait for police and play justified. He was too calm for a first kill. Remember how calm the defense said he was? Especially if he was on energy drinks. Hmm possibly a By-law enforcement officer by day and energy drink night stalker ...by night.
Although I do believe this is murder, this just goes towards never, ever talking to the police. In an interrogation they are never there to help, even if you're innocent. A detectives job is to convict, never exonerate
Stop with the moral equivalency of shoving someone to the ground and shooting someone. I get it you have an absolutist view of both morality and the law; bad is bad is bad. That mindset works great in whatever cartoon world the people who believe it live in. There are misdemeanours and felonies. There are classes of felonies (in some states). Clearly, there is some collective understanding that assault is worse than shoplifting. You know what is absolute though? Death. People are dead or alive and that father is dead.
I even feel sorry for the guy. He's just dumb. No critical thinking in a certain situation, just blindly following some rules whether they're applicable or not.
That guns ownership and open carrying is legal in the USA is absolutely beyond me, this is another life lost because this nutter has a gun. And don't even start about 'responsible gun owners', look at the rest of the world, if there is no gun threat, you don't need a gun. Sure in ie. the UK people are using knives and it is also a problem, but knives will always be inherently less dangerous than a gun.
Wow this incident is extremely disturbing. So much is wrong with this and the woman is sitting in the driver's seat at a convenience store with the child in the car he's such a liar the man was protecting his own and he was backing up when he saw the gun. This guy had murder in his heart his conscience had been seared I'm very angry at his actions extremely angry. WOW. SMH
People legit be so crazy now and days he went looking for a problem like and because I’m psych major bio minor I do understand that people are sometimes disturb but it’s just always be so unprovoked with all these cases
This guy is the shooting range die hard, that acts like normal life is one big tactical excercise he did on the range last week. The instructor said he did a good job so he thinks he is a real seal or green beret in combat.
The worst thing is that I truly feel bad for Drejka. He is fully guilty, has deep issues, and belongs in prison. But I feel so bad... He genuinely believes he was doing the right thing and that that's how it's supposed to thing. It seems like because of the level of his emotional awareness, he hasn't been able to process beyond "self-defense" and has remained at a certain developmental stage, at least regarding this issue. Imo, that makes him a danger to society and that's why he should be put away. I feel so sad for him though. He seems like a well-intentioned man (does not mean he actually does have good intentions..).
A small part of me feels bad, because I don’t think this is a man who is purely evil, or has any evil intentions. However, his problem is that he feels like he’s invincible because he’s carrying around a firearm. Sure, McGlockton’s car shouldn’t have been parked in a handicapped spot, but the argument never should have escalated as far as it did. Drejka knew his life wasn’t in danger, but in his mind, being shoved to the ground is a valid reason to take someone’s life. He was so eager to use his gun that once he was in a situation where in his eyes could be justified in the slightest, he took that opportunity. My heart goes out to McGlockton and his family, and his son who had to watch his own father collapse right in front of him.
That wasn’t self defense, it was revenge: “You pushed me, I have the right to shoot you.” We cannot have people like this guy in a society, if we want that society to be safe. What’s really disturbing - it chills me to the bones, frankly; when you think about it, is that he was armed already when he argued/had a heated conversation with the woman in the driver’s seat, with her small children in the car..
I swear these exact words were in my mind when I heard the prosecution's testimony. It was revenge. Drejka was pushed, he fell on his sorry ass, got angry and punished the guy by shooting him to take revenge for shoving him. The angle at which the bullet entered the body was another argument which I thought should have been risen. It wasn't the front side of the chest or torso, nor anywhere near the sternum. The wound was almost a perfect flank underneath the ribs. This case was simply about a small angry petty little SOB pretending to be a cop who wasn't even fit to be a security guard at a remote petrol station.
Absolutely. This man has a classic Napoleon complex that directly coincides with his fetish for being a hero. He's a danger to everyone around him. He was battered first, yes, but that wasn't grounds to shoot someone who was stepping away from you. They were already showing a digression in escalation. The 2 seconds between the two men before he decided to shoot, regardless of circumstance, is what really gives me chills.
I think you are doing Michael a bit of a disservice here. That was more than just a tiny push. Markeis pushed him so hard that he flew onto his back. If you have ever been attacked, beaten, or knocked prone then you would know how terrifying that is. Michael was justified in pulling his gun but shooting an unarmed man who was clearly trying to escape is disgusting. I get this sick feeling in my gut while watching the video and seeing it happen. That being said, every American has the right to bear arms (with the exception of felons) and there was nothing wrong with Michael having one on hand to defend himself. If you aren't physically powerful and know that a small breeze can knock you over let alone a grown 200-pound man then I suggest you buy a gun to protect yourself. It might save your life someday.
@InlikeFlynn i think the guy was not 'fleeing' but trying to rub it in his face along with is wife when he saw the gun and tried to deescalate the situation with a hero wannaber who was very angry at the time so i say it should have been 2 years in solitary not 20 in reg.
@Zachary Green You're right seeing someone yelling at your wife over a stupid parking space in a nearly empty parking lot would make anybody pissed off but I would say that most people wouldn't resort to violence immediately. Most people would use words first, yell at Michael tell him to go away but Markeis said nothing and attacked Michael causing Michael to panic and pull his gun. They both handled this situation poorly the difference is that one of them walked away from this instance and the other is dead and that fills me with sadness. It shouldn't have turned out this way.
@Deathkillshoot The Brony of Naboo I'm not, I simply represented what I would also do in that case, had I been him. I have a concealed carry and have been in confrontations before. Hell, I've been sucker punched and didn't feel the need to pull my gun. This man let his ego be inflated by the fact that he had a firearm. Plain and simple.
@Zebness If the white guy was bigger, would the black guy have been so aggressive or would he have shown him more respect and tried to de-escalate? It goes both ways.
5 likes
John Sampson2021-12-21 05:50:27 (edited 2021-12-21 05:52:41 )
@Zachary Green Napoleon complex? Interesting take... Funny how there's no word for overly aggressive tall men who take advantage of their size to bully shorter men. It's always the short guy's fault. As if short guys don't have it hard enough already from the get go.
Well you can be armed whenever you want. What's disturbing to me is that he thinks it makes him some sort of arbiter of law. I couldn't imagine starting a fight when I carry
It's also VERY worth mentioning 4 others came forward to attest he harassed them in their vehicles as well, one of which was a woman with two children in the vehicle as well, and stated he even threatened them that he had a gun. That's pretty much all I need to hear to know he'd been thinking of doing it for a while, even if just subconsciously him doing it consistently was just a means to give him the opportunity.
@Sharpshooter You're right, a light shove done against someone who is unbalanced will cause them to fall over but this was no light shove. Even with the grainy footage, you can see Markeis putting his weight behind that push. Fighting for most people is uncommon as most people try to resolve situations using words and only use violence as a last resort. As to whether or not being knocked prone and helpless against an unknown assailant is terrifying or not I suppose it depends on whether or not you like being helpless. It shouldn't just be the yanks who are soft, fighting is assault and carries a jail sentence and ultimately I wouldn't say Americans are soft so much as cautious. In the U.S. people like suing each other. The national pastime is not baseball it's suing your neighbor's pants off for every tiny infraction of the law. Imagine trying to start fights in a society that wants to steal your money at every opportunity.
@The Adventures of Steve-Marco sorry, was he supposed to ask for consent to shove him? Did he ask consent to go harassing that woman about how the car was parked?
Like when I played dodgeball and really got this kid good. He was so enraged that he came up right behind me when I wasnt looking and through the ball hard on my back... Nothing but racist inferiority complex, and revenge or a mix
A push can lead to someone's death though... there was a story of this renter who was pushed by the young man he was trying to help, and he died cause he landed hard on his head. Sorry, if you're going to physically assault someone get ready for the consequences. Of course, since the guy initiated the shouting match and was the original aggressor his claim to self defense is gone. But your statement “You pushed me, I have the right to shoot you.” is absolutely correct, despite your sarcasm. If you go around assaulting people for no reason, a simple push could be the end of your life as well as the life of the person you pushed.
@Kira Nopeee. In most countries and states, its `You push me , i can shoot you` If you have a gun in hand and a person pushes you to ground you can use it( or tries to push you to ground). I think kyle rittenosue case is a perfect example of that. But you can't use the gun the way this guy used. Practically as soon as markeis stopped advancing after michael draw his gun. The reason to fire it was gone. He could've kept it drawn as a protective measure but shooting was totally illegal.
thats what I saw, if the dude continued to attack and charge then maybe, but he stopped next to his wife. That looks like a man protecting his family, dude should have minded his own business, its a frikking parking spot!!!
I gotta say that I do not feel sorry for the guy who got shot at all. At the end of the day you cannot sneak up behind somebody and fucking assault them just because they were arguing with your wife. The fact that he had zero issue immediately reacting with violence(in front of his kids no less) says everything I need to know about him. Hell just the fact that they decided to park in a handicapped zone with their kids present leads to me to believe that they were teaching their kids all kinds of fucked up behavior.
"Oh but he was yelling at her!" I don't care, don't assault people you fools. Come on now we learned this in kindergarten.
Let me be clear however, Michael was NOT within his right to kill this man and absolutely deserved his sentence. He could have easily charged this loser with assault and would have won 100%.
That said all I'm seeing here is natural selection at play. If you think you can just go through life assaulting people who inconvenience you then good luck because you're going to need it. Say what you will but at the end of the day I've already won because I'm not some dumbass who got shot for trying to be tough.
How dare you challenge my ego?! I'm self-appointed parking inspector; I was just doing my job. Drejka was in fear, not for his life, but in fear of another ego blow. We HAVE to learn to tame that ego.
The fact that he said he literally could not imagine if he would approach someone if he didn’t have a firearm because he has never ever gone without carrying one.. man is looking for an opportunity to shoot someone
@Deathkillshoot The Brony of Naboo but it doesn’t matter if the black man has “worse anger issues” - he didn’t deserve to get shot!! Nothing he did, nothing he said would have made him a fair target for deadly violence. No one had any right to shoot him since he wasn’t any deadly threat to anybody anywhere.
I feel like he wouldnt have pulled the gun if the guy didnt get aggressively physical. In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it. If he got physical then the guy would wanna get back at him harder, which is shooting the gun. Theres no equal revenge at that point.
@Rosemary Agreed it doesn't matter legally, but still a dumb idea to go around pushing people to the ground. Being legally in the right doesn't mean you won't end up dead. Never know who has an itchy trigger finger and looking for a reason to shoot someone.
self defence is generally considered to be arguable when it is evident that the victim is incapable of escaping the situation. if the perpetrator here had just got up from the ground, turned around, and attempted to dash away, and the man who pushed him followed even by one inch, then the perpetrator turned around and shot him, it would be arguable as self defence
What I’m shocked by is that the prosecutor uses the term “perfect shot”, with the bullet going through the lungs and heart. That would never be used here in Europe, as it’s quite the opposite of perfect. Only in America I guess. Gun slingers...
You missed the point. The shot was perfect in that it was extremely likely to be lethal. That’s virtually impossible to dispute. It would be a lethal shot in the U.S., Europe, and anywhere else in the world. He’s not saying that it was morally or ethically perfect.
35:02 Gun Control Now because people with deadly weapons often cannot control themselves when they are frightened, angry, drunk or depressed. 'It was over when that gun came out.'
That poor women and her kids :( Absolutely heart breaking. My prayers go out to her Lost her lover and father to her kids for absolutely no good reason other than (in my opinion) racism… I have a strong feeling that he wouldn’t have shot him if he was white- also assumed authorities would take his side 🙄
Carrying a weapon will give any normal person an elevated sense of safely, which easily can become a sense of empowerment to initiate confrontation that they otherwise would not engage. This video is a perfect example, he is walking up to a parked car with unknown people inside, is verbally aggressive over parking in a handicap spot, and then find himself pushed to the ground from someone he did not expect. Psychologically, this is very likely a moment he has been anticipating for many years, some type of confrontation that he perceives requires deadly force. He is, the real life example of Travis Bickle from the movie Taxi Driver. In his mind, he is the vigilante hero that was confronting out of control criminals. What I wonder about, is how many unreported confrontations had he initiated over the years, but the people backed away because they became aware he had a gun. Such confrontations would further escalate his increasing sense of power and authority over others that led to this deadly encounter. He had developed a bit of a God complex. In otherwords, he was going to shoot somebody someday, it simply was a matter of time. And it would not surprise me if, like in the movie Taxi Driver, he practiced at home in the mirror saying something similar to "Are you talking to me?" and then practices repeatedly pulling out the weapon pointing it at himself in the mirror as if mirror image were someone pointing a gun at him. Another common term that could be applied is Self-fulling prophecy.
Good comment. It is absolutely right that the person with the weapon is more likely starting a confrontation because last but not least he will not get harmed in a fight. Maybe Dr. Grande is known here. Within another but similar case he stated, that the one with the weapon has the duty to care about calming down and de-escalating the situation.
yeah this is basically what happens when people dont train or check laws, a gun is an extremely usefull self defense tool but this guy really didnt know how to use it hell he could have just flashed the gun at him the confrontation probably would have finished then still tho he should not have started the confrontation by parking by them and making an argument
@OceanSwimmer Yeah. I don't make sweeping assumptions about those who own guns. I lived in Alaska where is it was wise to own a gun because bears are everywhere, including the major cities. Such people tend to be smart about owning a weapon. Hypothetically, it is reasonable to conclude that Drekja could have just as easily run another car off the road with his truck because the driver did not properly signal a lane change. The driver dies as a result, and Drekja justifies his actions to the police in same way, he perceives that his actions were required, it was him or the driver of the other car, which he would point out the driver started the deadly the counter by not properly signaling a lane change and Drekja had no other course of action to save himself.
@cika blyat Ideally, the gun lobby and avid gun owners would be the ones who push the strongest to keep firearms out of the hands of people who are likely to misuse weapons. Such as levels of proficiency and ethical use of weapons. Level 1: demonstrate that a person can handle a weapon correctly, store is safely, know what to do after it has been fired, etc. Advancing to higher levels would entitle individuals to own more powerful weapons because they have proven to the gun owning community (their peers) that they have acquired the skills and experience needed to handle those weapons and are emotionally\mental stable. They rise to become the best of the best, highly respective individuals for their skills and very high ethical standards on how they use of weapons.
@P M The description is about mental and emotional instability\maturity that can lead to a crime. A stable adult of his age would have unlikely fired the weapon. But, even before it got that far, a stable person would most likely walked away rather than continue to escalate the confrontation over a car parked in a spot reserved for handicap drivers.
Any normal person carrying a weapon gets a heightened sense of responsibility, as would any normal martial artist, that’s why you don’t see normal people (meaning what’s common) flipping out on handicap parking and firing shots when they don’t have to. Which would be criminal. Which is what you described.
@Neal Noble -- yeah, I agree about Drejka. He had complaints on the record of brandishing his weapon at other drivers, one of whom had children in the car. His attitude is scary & creepy.
Parking in the handicap spot and pushing someone on the ground over an argument, knowing cops won't do shit about it is the type of thing that Taxi Driver is based on though. The assault was as unjustified as the shooting and they both paid severely.
I think he was mad at them parking at the disable parking spot. I feel like he wouldnt have pulled the gun if the guy didnt get aggressively physical. In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it. If he got physical then the guy would wanna get back at him harder, which is shooting the gun. Theres no equal revenge at that point.
@Christina Galler they were both in the wrong, but if Drefka had been a man and fought with his fists instead of immediately going to the gun like a coward, a father would still be alive and Drefka would have his worthless life back.
4 likes
Wolf Girl2022-02-20 20:57:18 (edited 2022-02-20 21:01:51 )
Oof- yeah I can agree with that, tho I live in alaska and I open carry/conceal carry a lot. Mostly when I’m going fishing. I grew up shooting guns (it’s literally one of my earliest memories) but I was also taught at a young age that you don’t A) point that thing at anyone or anything you don’t plan to shoot B) a very high level of muzzle awareness/gun safety C) you’re absolutely RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERY BULLET that leaves the chamber so you better know your target and know your backdrop. We don’t require any kind of formal training here to open carry/conceal carry and to me it is concerning. I think people should at least have to pass a basic safety course and background check in order to carry a gun. I agree that it gives some a false sense of security and they think they’re a badass and don’t fully comprehend or understand pulling a gun on someone. I was also in the military for 14 years where I deployed 4 times and carried at least one gun 24/7 during that time. It’s nothing for me to carry a gun/just feels like an extension of myself- BUT pulling that same gun on someone is a huge deal to me- it’s something I NEVER want to have to do and I find the though actually terrifying. I’ve used it for warning shots for a moose when I was with my dog team once and also to warn off a sow grizzly bear who had a cub when I was salmon fishing. That was incident enough for me but it’s also a great tool to have to protect yourself in the back woods. I don’t carry it if I go to the gas station or grocery store (unless I’m going fishing) I really can agree with the fact that not all people should be able to carry firearms if they have a history of violence or are not right in the head. But on the flip side- there are just regular people like me that use it for self protection/protection of my dear sleddogs when in the Alaskan back country.
@Christopher Anderson He turned a verbal fight to a physical one. He aggressively started the physical fight first. That’s why you don’t do that to stranger coz u don’t know who has weapons.
@Christina Galler A lesson for the living, never get physically aggressive with anyone, lets alone a stranger who might be unstable and carrying a weapon. The killed man was ticked off that some strange man was verbally hostile to his wife\GF, and ended up dead because he over-reacted. The same can be said for Drejka, he over-reacted to someone parking in a handicapped spot, and now he will spend the rest of his life in prison. Bottom line, two strangers over-reacted to a very trivial situation, and both lost their lives over it.
Have you heard about a very similar case when the shooter, Mike Dunn shot a teenager in a truck at a convenience store for playing loud music. Dunn said, "Are you talking to me?"
Johnny Natrium2022-03-18 18:23:40 (edited 2022-03-18 18:24:26 )
You could've just said Ban guns. The thing about that is, in countries where guns are banned, people actually don't feel afraid to verbally speak their mind when they see someone breaking the law, like the person parking in a handicapped space. It's win-win, both sides. No overly aggressive responses to verbal confrontations; no vigilantes.
@Christina Galler In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it.
Technically the guy who appointed himself the parking space monitor (Drejka) initiated the entire subsequent chain of events that led to his own demise and the death of another person. He created the conflict even if for some perverse reason he felt in his head that he was in the right. And I do think the push was a violent overreaction, but nonetheless Drejka inserted himself into those people's lives that day. And he did it while carrying.
@The Great Pumpkin was that a disabled parking space? If so then Drejka was just telling them to not use that space. If Drejka is that bad, he would have shot those people in the car. It was only until someone else got physical when he took out his gun. That’s how I judge the video. I don’t know him or the full story that we don’t get to hear or see.
@Christina Galler was that a disabled parking space?
I've actually read that it wasn't [a legal handicapped parking space], although this came out after the fact. And Drejka might have been justified in drawing his weapon because he was attacked, however he was not justified in shooting the weapon. Drejka was also a guy with a documented history of confronting people over the same parking spot (which at the time was poorly painted and easy to miss if you weren’t paying attention).
@Christina Galler I would suggest you look into Drejka's history, too. He had been pulling the gun when people’s driving annoyed him at least four times, meaning it's possible there are more undocumented instances. Two of these were on women with kids in the car. He also pulled on two teenagers who slowed down for a yellow instead of running it. In short, he - much like many aggressive cops or wannabe vigilante/security/police types - has a past history of aggressive and anti-social behavior prior to some case that ends tragically for someone.
@The Great Pumpkin I never did say what he did is justified. But if you start being physical then you’re asking for it. You don’t know if these people are crazy and might have a weapon. If he didn’t push him like that, I’m sure the outcome would be so much different. Maybe I’m watching too many instant karma videos.
@The Great Pumpkin I never did say what he did is justified. But if you start being physical then you’re asking for it. You don’t know if these people are crazy and might have a weapon. If he didn’t push him like that, I’m sure the outcome would be so much different. Maybe I’m watching too many instant karma videos.
@Christina Galler if you start being physical then you’re asking for it. You don’t know if these people are crazy and might have a weapon.
I don't know that you're ASKING TO BE SHOT, but I do agree that if you do this you're inviting trouble. But the fact remains that Drejka ultimately initiated the entire sequence of events:
If he didn’t push him like that, I’m sure the outcome would be so much different.
True, but also, if Drejka didn't harass someone over a parking space, NONE of what followed would have transpired, either. And he has a history of doing this, so maybe he was asking for it? Considering the following history, it follows that if the shooting was "instant karma", then Drejka getting pushed and ultimately incarcerated was "delayed karma" for all of the following:
A truck driver parked in that same spot. 3 months prior to this incident, Drejka confronted one Richard Kelly, who claims that at some point during the argument Drejka told him he was going to shoot him.
A woman who drove too slow through a school zone: On December 12, 2012, a woman told a Largo Police Department officer that a man driving a black Toyota truck (later identified as Drejka) pointed a gun at her and the passengers in the vehicle.
A teen didn’t drive through a yellow light. On January 10, 2012, Tyler Smith was driving with a friend when a traffic light turned yellow. Smith decided not to drive through the light and stopped his vehicle. Drejka honked his horn and yelled at Smith. Drejka held a black handgun out the driver’s side window of his vehicle and motioned for Smith to walk back to his truck.
Then there was also a brake-checking incident. What he did can cause a major accident. And Drejka was cited for this.
I carry and avoid all confrontation at all costs. I never want to actually have to use my weapon on a living being but will if my kids' lives are being threatened. It's very last resort. Just difference in personalities I guess.
I disagree that carrying a gun gives you a sense of safety making you more likely to confront. My husband carries and he avoids any and all conflict BC he is carrying and would never want to use his weapon. People who carry don’t automatically want to use the gun…most de-escalate bc they don’t want to have to hurt anyone. This man was absolutely looking for a reason to use his gun…it was not self defense. In my opinion if you’re the aggressor then you are not acting in “self defense” you’re the perpetrator, the violent one…and this man took away a father, husband, son, and friends life away from many who loved him, for no reason at all. I pray for the victims family, and I pray this is a lesson that carrying a gun should be reason to avoid confrontation and like the commenter said it’s a LAST RESORT when you feel like you or a loved one is in serious danger. The LAST resort.
People who lawfully carry weapons stop criminals and defend themselves and others lawfully every day, my husband included. This man was mentally unstable. I am for the 2nd amend, however, I am also for background checks and not letting people with mental histories of any kind purchase weapons.
Blah blah comment. Love you JCS. I know what you stand for, keep being based.
0 likes
Joseph N2020-02-16 03:29:52 (edited 2020-02-26 15:11:52 )
For anyone who is interested in how long he got: He was sentenced to 20 years for this in October 2019. Also 2 days ago, Feb, 2020 he was attacked in jail with a lock in a sock and had to be put in protective custody for his own safety..
Richard Porter needs the lock in a sock himself. He can't possibly know what's being said between the parties. But what is abundantly clear is that the G.I. Joe wannabe is the one who initiated everything. Sure looks to me like the boyfriend was offended by what he was saying to his girlfriend and pushed him down. He got a boo boo and his feelings were hurt so he shot him. Too scared to fight him like a real man would do. By the way, how do you know he got the lock in a sock?
20 years!! This is not fair at all. A guy with money and fame killed his ex wife and friends and got free of all charges. On the other hand, a guy trying to do the right thing was attacked by wrong doer and had to kill the guy for self defense is sentenced to 20 years. You Americans are funny.
@blacknosugarnocream so im an idiot because our opinions are different from each other.!! You let OJ get away with murder. Your American system is funny from an unbiased foreign person. Im from Nort East India, we are not these typical Indian rather a tibeto burman decindent. So, Why they park in handicap spot.? Why the father shoved him instead of trying to reason him. The driver was physically big and was a bully here, he knew he can slapt around that little guy, that's why he pushed him. But he bullied the wrong person. Clearly we all knew the killer is some sort of a looney.
The scary part of this is the man genuinely believing he did no wrong. He was scared of a big black guy that pushed him to the ground because of a confrontation he started of him yelling at his girlfriend with his multiple children around so like a coward he pulls his gun out presumably from racial stereotypes assuming the mans going to shoot or stab him and purposely takes aim and shoots this man knowing damn well he was backing away. He was just looking for an excuse to shoot somebody.
You’re terrible person, too say such a thing, no matter what a person has done no one deserves death. Mistakes don’t =death, then everyone in the world would be dead. Pls think before you comment
@COD ProCamp You know this is about serious stuff, right? These are real people who have gone through real shit- is this really the right place to troll?
iffy 1 never put your hands on folks 2 if u seen him stop shouldn't have shot just tell him to back up but then again I wasn't there in the heat of the moment he probably legit thought he was in some shit cant say if I would have shot or not but u feel like if he gave homeboy a verbal warning after he pulled the gun nobody would have died
Anyone notice how this guys sprained wrist seems to become painless every time he gets hot and bothered and starts raising his voice, talking fast, and whipping his sore wrist around, then he babies it again when he starts to calm down?
The fact that he’s making false statements about the nature of the initial engagement tells you all you need to know about a man walking around with a gun. He’s instigating conflict in the HOPE that he’s able to use his weapon.
Tbh, even if you're in the right, it's not surprising to be in a defensive state considering the fact that you could think you might've just done something wrong. When things like these happen in the spur of the moment, you can never tell.
Hell_Pike there are plenty of folks walking around with that mentality. They all have this perverse hero fantasy rattling around their skulls. Many of them literally praying they are involved in a scenario where they are the “good guy with a gun”’ that puts a halt to some forthcoming tragedy. It’s extremely misguided, and makes for dangerous gun owners.
It’s truly amazing how many times the interrogator asks him “so he did something to provoke a fear for you life, right?” only for him to respond “no! Absolutely not! I had no reason at all to fire!”
@J B you understand WHY.... he’s not trying to help him. He’s trying to be his buddy so the dude doesn’t lawyer up. And so the perp can incriminate him self more. Is this your first video? You should watch more videos to understand this tactic
@Jennifer x9000 Michael Drejka was released from custody right after this interrogation. He killed a black man and he was allowed to walk free for a month. Didn’t even have to make bail. If that isn’t the epitome of white privilege then please tell me what that is.
@J B It’s a little childish to assume he was let go because he was white. Sure it isn’t fair when it happens, but there are plenty of black, Hispanic, and Asian people who were allowed to leave after interrogation despite being guilty. It is not a color thing, it’s a criminal justice thing; claiming it to be the former is lazy, and you can’t even prove it, so why say something like that which only spreads separation and does not really aim to fix the problem you’re pointing out?
@Kayla Short oh yeah.. pointing out systemic racism “spreads” separation. Let’s all just ignore it then. Wouldn’t want to “spread separation” because apparently that’s all that matters.
Y’all need to take investigators with a grain of salt. These people are not your friends. But you think they are on your side Bc that’s what they want you to think. I’ll stop trying to teach the ignorant and hope your knowledge of police work/ investigation has nothing to do with race IN THIS CASE.
@J B It sounds like he was trying to help him but he was actually just trying to cooperate with him in a way that he would not ask for legal counsel or not stop giving information
This is what Michael McGlockton's Father said to Drejka in court: "You deserve to die in prison," he said. "In the Bible, it says that in order to get into heaven we must forgive those who trespass against us. At this point in my life, I am not there yet. And if it just so happens that the Lord chooses to take me before I come to terms with this, then I will see you in hell, where you and I will finish this. Mark my words."
Imagine being ordered to forgive someone who rape and murder your whole family. You hug and forgive this man, or you arent allowed in to heaven. Sounds like a good god doesnt it?
To me it sounds more like the Devil having a little fun, before you stand infront of him.
I understand that going through life, with hatred or revenge serves no one any good. But what i cannot do, with someone who murder my loved ones, is forgive them. Atleast not nilly willy. Because a book commands me to do so.
@Brandon Rogers True, and that's what people in the YT comments don't seem to understand. Threatening and insulting criminals does not make them better than the criminals. Yet I am labeled as the troll here and the angry, violent YT mob thinks that they are the "good" people. I bet half of them would do the same or even worse if they were in Drejkas position.
Without the CCTV there wouldn’t have been sufficient evidence to prove what actually happened. He would have walked away a free man. Witnesses aren’t as reliable and affective as you’d like to think in cases like this.
@Daveyhavok832 I mean he does kinda have a point, people aren’t just gonna “forget” that he shot the other person. No matter how much you twist the story there’s not gonna be much room for reason.
@Daveyhavok832 what witnesses? People who claim they heard/didn’t hear the police announce themselves? I don’t think that counts as being a witness to the shooting.
@Kurt Mattox was her boyfriend not in the house at the time? He is a witness to her murder no matter how hard the police attempt to discredit him to save their own asses.
@Daveyhavok832 Him shooting at police upon their entry does not categorize him as a witness since he is directly involved in the incident itself. There were no witnesses
@Kurt Mattox if you want to maintain a childlike understanding of a very simple word in an attempt to uphold some bullshit definition that is purposefully twisted to shield those in power, I can’t stop you. No sense in arguing with a victim of brainwashing. Regardless of what happened after Breonna Taylor’s murder, the atrocity was witnessed by everyone in that house. Their involvement in it does not mean that they are not witnesses, except perhaps in a court of law. Even then, that is a severely flawed argument. When someone sees something happen, they are a witness. Period.
Now, you mentioned the neighbors that have all said the police did not announce themselves. These people are witnesses. You will try to convolute things by saying that they only heard but didn’t see. Hence the term “eyewitness.” People are smart. So people came up with different words for similar things. If I say a bench with a blindfold on and the person next to me had an argument with his father and his father murdered him on the spot, am I not a witness to the murder having only heard it? Of course not.
@Daveyhavok832 lets see, Police officers had a warrant to search the apartment. Her boyfriend was a suspected cocaine dealer and his listed home address was hers. (which later turned out to be true, he was arrested for cocaine trafficking) her boyfriend fired at the police first. They returned fire and accidently killed Breonna Taylor. Thats why nobody got arrested.
@Daveyhavok832 You mean the guy who shot at police and was later arrested for Cocaine trafficking. You mean the guy who the search warrant was intended for? YA thats what we call a credible witness.....
@Daveyhavok832 So you think the polilce went in to murder HER but not her boyfriend and because he had no ties to drug dealing? They just did it because WHY? Why? let me guess, he was black. But wait!?!? Why didnt they kill him?
@Daveyhavok832 Her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, admitted to firing at police as they entered the apartment but claimed he believed the officers were intruders. He allegedly struck Officer Jonathan Mattingly.
In the search warrant affidavit filed before the raid of Taylor’s apartment, police said they believed Glover could be keeping drugs and money at her home. During the recorded jail call after the raid, in which Glover said Taylor was "hanging onto my money" for him, he claimed she had about $14,000 – and that he could walk into her home and find it.
"She had the eight I gave her the other day ... and she picked up another six," Glover told an unidentified man
Apparently she bailed Glover out of prison before, who she had dated in the past. They also had evidence, including phone conversations which stated Glover was hiding money with her.
She was interviewed about the homicide of Fernandez Bowman. Ms. Taylor rented the car he was found in. She was dating the victim’s brother’s drug-dealing associate, Jamarcus Glover. The brother is Demarius Bowman.
Ms. Taylor posted a bond for Glover on two occasions. Glover was believed to be involved in very violent crime in the area. Glover was committing crimes in a car registered to Breonna Taylor.
People calling from jail called her phone number 48 times from January 1, 2016, to January 3, 2020. Glover called her 26 times and another felon with drug possession charges, Curtis Palm, called her 7 times.
The Glover car was at Taylor’s house 6 times. It had been tracked numerous times to trap houses but the car was hard to surveil because Glover performed “heat checks.” The detectives had a GPS put on the car. They found that he left her house with USPS packages.
They also discovered that Glover had ties to the narcotics trafficking in Mississippi where he once lived.
They observed Ms. Taylor on February 13th of this year drive Glover to a trap house and wait for him. At one point, she got out of the car in front of one of the trap houses and looked around. Glover got in the car a short while later. They found a large amount of drugs hidden out in back of that property. They also found illicit firearms.
They also found an LG&E bill with Adrian Walker’s name on it.
By February 20th, Glover was using Taylor’s address.
A search warrant was executed in March for Breonna Taylor, and the address. Kenneth Walker was now living at the address.
Wow looks like I did get some facts wrong. It wasnt Her current boyfriends fault at all. Well except for the part where he opened fire on police. That was kind of his fault.
@Daniel G that’s a big problem. I’m against cops killing anybody that doesn’t present an immediate threat. But I don’t work in the media so I’m not going to take the blame for what they choose to cover. Having said that, I’ve seen firsthand how black people can be treated differently by police. Too often, there is no attempt to de-escalate a situation regardless of the race of the person. Too often, police respond to calls that they’re untrained and illequipped to handle. So my problem, as I said before, are when racist dipshits flock to the internet to defend people that are killing other people. I make mistakes at work. But when I make a mistake, nobody is going to die. If I were in a position where that was a possibility, I’d be speaking up. I would be demanding proper training. I wouldn’t want to worry about how I was going to sleep at night. I wouldn’t be walking around with my chest puffed out, acting like my “brothers” are above the law and can do no wrong.
It baffles me how little understanding he had of the severity of his situation, it seems like he thought that he would walk out of there and be celebrated as a hero
He probably still is hailed as a hero to his like minded friends and family and would be to all of America if it weren't for the video cameras that caught it.
@Makima Tier 3 Sub He pushed him to put distance between his family and a strange man yelling at them. Would you be fine with some strange man screaming at your wife and children? A gunshot is not an equal response to a shove. He hesitated and waited until the deceased was BACKING AWAY FROM HIM (meaning he was no longer a threat) when he pulled the trigger. That’s why he’s in prison today.
@gabrielle roberts No i won’t be fine with that but at the same time i ain’t letting anybody touch me and getaway with it scotfree either. Now where i live we don’t carry guns like in america but some of us keep knives on us just incase for instances like this. Nobody should be allowed to get their hands on anyone else no matter what reason. I’m not siding with the guy in the video either because he is obviously very dumb for not getting a good lawyer for this
@Makima Tier 3 Sub And would you have stabbed this man as he was backing away from you after you produced whatever weapon you’d be carrying? Or would you realize the threat had passed? And no, a good lawyer wouldn’t have gotten him off. He screwed up because he’s BEEN wanting to use his gun and jumped at the opportunity to fire at someone that was retreating. He was going to prison whether he had the best lawyer in the country or not.
@Makima Tier 3 Sub I wouldn’t say he caused it. Drejka parked illegally to go confront someone else about being in an handicapped space unnecessarily. THAT’S what caused this. Who gets in a screaming match with someone over a parking space (that he didn’t need himself, mind you) when simply telling them, “hey, you shouldn’t do that if you don’t need this spot” then moving along would suffice? I’m not enabling the victim here… he’s dead. I’m placing blame on the one that TOOK A LIFE over a shove.
@Shiloh Wehrmacht Absolutely not, not only given the circumstances of this case, but all relevant past encounters he’s had on the road or in parking lots. As the narrator pointed out, Drejka had pulled this same gun on two men and two women (one with children in her vehicle) on four separate occasions, prior to killing this young father. He was itching to use it.
@gabrielle roberts any good attorney would ensure none of those prior incidents could be brought up during the trial (its prejudicial evidence not directly relevant to the case and doesnt directly show his state of mind either)
@Shiloh Wehrmacht They could argue that it’s prejudicial, but since he’d confronted at least one other person at that store over that same space AND threatened to shoot him, that would likely be allowed in and would directly show a pattern of behavior that preceded the fatal shooting. Drejka was a ticking time bomb. Unfortunately for this young father, Drejka finally thought he was justified to use lethal force. A jury of his peers disagreed, thankfully.
@Shiloh Wehrmacht Also, if the defense accidentally opens the door for prosecutors (claiming Drejka was just an easy going guy trying to “better society,” as they did) to bring forth character witnesses as well as those who’d been confronted by Drejka in a particularly hostile manner, the judge would have no choice but to let that evidence against him in.
@gabrielle roberts thats a mostly fair argumemt but Ive seen good lawyers get all evidence the other side thrown out by questioning officers and getting one link in the evidenciary chain to be labeled questionable then damnable
@Shiloh Wehrmacht I’ve seen it and done it before as well, but I don’t think it would have been so easy in this case. I would have encouraged him to take a plea, but, if I recall correctly, Drejka wasn’t offered one.
He is...a confident, experienced and law-abiding gun owner...I'm very proud that he used his gun in SYG self defense regardless of the injustice he was the victim of.
@Sabrason you need to read over it again because Drekja did not even see the attack coming to believe he was in any kind of danger. When Drekja saw his attacker he was already on the ground pulling out his weapon and his attacker immediately retreated even before Drekja pulled his weapon. So how is it a justified shooting when he was no longer in danger? You can’t just go around shooting people because you were shoved
@MarvNoGood Your comment proves what a dunce you are. Drekja didn't think he was in danger BEFORE the attack, he reasonably believed he was in danger AFTER the attack -- as any reasonable person would after being violently shoved to the ground and injured like he was -- which justified lethal force with a gun particularly since McGlockton continued towards him for 2-3 steps AFTER the push and only slightly turned to the right once the gun was pulled but said nothing. You call that slight partial turn a "retreat" but I would argue that in that instant there was no way for Drejka to know if that was a half-hearted/reluctant "retreat" or if McGlockton was evading and repositioning to draw his own weapon so Drejka correctly fired ONE bullet to neutralize the threat and prevent further bodily harm to himself = clear cut, textbook SYG. Look it up. You are NOT required to wait for a violent aggressor to CONTINUE to inflict bodily harm more than once before you use lethal force. This is not difficult to understand if you understand the SYG law which states that if you reasonably feel your life is in danger or bodily harm is imminent you can use lethal force. Period. End of discussion. You say "you can't go around shooting people because you were shoved" but the SYG law says otherwise in certain instances and I'd add that you can't go around laying hands on people and violently pushing people to the ground and not expect a defensive response. It's that simple.
@Sabrason by that logic, you can’t go around antagonizing/yelling at people and playing vigilante just because people parked in the wrong spot. McGlockton could have argued that he had no way of knowing if Drejka was going to cause the mother of his children bodily harm as the man aggressively yells at her over a parking spot. I can’t stand able bodied people who park handicapped parking spots either but it’s not my job to correct that behavior. Report it to the property authority and move on with life.
Also, you’ve missed a very clear indicator that you’re not as law savvy as you’d like to believe. The SYG law states that you can meet force with force (including deadly force) if you REASONABLY feel your life is in danger. That’s the key word and that one word is why this man was arrested and later found guilty. By his own admission, he thought he would be kicked - not killed. Kicked. And if he thought the kick was enough to have killed him then he would have phrased it that way. Given how forthcoming Drejka was with proving justification for his actions, if he genuinely mistook McGlockton pivoting to leave for reaching for his own gun then he would have said as much. Not once did he say he feared McGlockton had a gun despite the officers continuously providing him with the opportunity to do so.
@Sabrason - Aw shucks. Egg on my face, man. I’m so sorry. I didn’t realize I was talking to an expert. I hear Drejka is looking to appeal. You should offer your expert legal services. He’ll be free in no time.
@Sabrason "Like every other anti-white racist in here with an afrocentric agenda, you have little if any understanding of the SYG law" You are showing zero integrity for discourse with speak like that. It makes your bias and views see-through, especially after laying out several chapters of pseudo facts which only you find convincing.
@Sabrason Pal, McG obviously retreated after he saw the gun, never reached towards his pocket or any place he could've held the weapon. He was backing the f away from that situation sooo, no, no way the shooting was justified. These are clear facts you can see from the recording, no matter how much you try to twist the situation.
@Painted Collection I'm certainly no expert (although still A LOT brighter than you) but, again, per the defense team, there' are legal experts around the country who agree that is was a justified use of SYG so all of you amateur armchair attorneys should consider some self-reflection as to why you disagree with those experts when the SYG law is quite clear. You're free to contact any one of those experts including Drejka's defense attorneys and I'm sure they'd be happy to explain it to you also.
@Sabrason Whaaaa?! A convict’s defense team says they’re innocent?! Holy crow! That’s certainly a new one. That means there’s a whoooole lot of people who should be set free right away. We should let someone know. But wait... what about all the legal expects who say Drejka WASN’T justified in his actions? Hmmm. Guess we’ll just pretend they don’t exist. Makes sense to me. You’re a genius!
@Sabrason - That turn around might have worked if I had been trying to claim people weren’t outraged by a white dude killing a black dude. They were outraged by it. So what? That doesn’t make RoboCop wannabe any less guilty of shooting a man who was retreating away from him. Anyone who is that that jumpy shouldn’t carry.
But I’ll entertain your silly game one last time. A black guy starts screaming at a white woman for parking in a handicap spot. Her white husband comes out and shoves the black man away from her. Black man pulls a gun, the white man starts to retreat but black man shoots anyway and the white man dies in front of his children. You think the black shooter wouldn’t have been charged? You think the black shooter wouldn’t have gone to prison? Not only would the black shooter have gone to prison but he would have deserved it. I get the feeling you wouldn’t be over here crying about the injustice of it all had the races been reversed but I hope I’m wrong. Either way, I think I’ve had my share of entertaining your delusional confirmation bias. Cheers bud.
@Painted Collection I have no need to read the entirety of your nonsense b/c I don't agree with your false premise that Drejka KNEW in a split second of time that McGlockton was "retreating."
@Lobo Lara Yes, yes it does and if you understood the SYG law you would know that. "Possibly getting beat because you were an asshole justifies a kill? = fear of imminent bodily harm = justifies lethal force. Certainly no "free license to kill" but it is a license to defend oneself from imminent bodily harm or fear of death which is perfectly legitimate and justified. Innocent citizens should not be defenseless victims to criminals with no legal ability to defend themselves by whatever means necessary.
@Sabrason how is getting pushed to the ground a deadly force? this man was NEVER in danger of death and you can see that clearly in the tapes. you assume you’re the only one who knows the law and everyone else is stupid, but the truth is that you’re grasping at straws and not even reading people’s answers because you’re trying to cover up your own idiocy. there’s a reason drejka is in prison! i don’t see how a youtube comment from someone who can’t find anything better to do with their life than pretend law in youtube comments is going to change that.
@Sabrason im sorry but no. He was simply shoved not punched, stabbed or held by the throat he was shoved theres no reason anyone should be pulling a weapon on a person that simply shoved them and didnt keep going towards them especially since he was the one that started the altercation. And mister trigger happy also had a pretty long time to realize that the “agressor” wasnt really trying to attack him anymore
@clara Clara, you're not getting it because you don't understand the SYG law. In danger of death is NOT the only circumstance that the law allows deadly force to be used for. It's also imminent bodily harm (look it up and keep reading it) which Drejka was reasonably in fear of since he was ALREADY harmed once by McGlockton. That's why the legal experts agree that it was a justified shooting. Somebody violently pushes you off your feet out of nowhere most normal people would fear further bodily harm which is a reasonable and rational fear in that situation. Some of you seem to want to the shoot messenger when in reality you just don't agree with the SYG law and apparently want victims to remain defenseless after being assaulted.
@Jeff Au_blum Well, you have a right to disagree with the SYG law but being violently "shoved" to the ground injuring an arm would make most reasonable/rational people fear further bodily harm which justifies deadly force = SYG. It's that simple. Let's be clear that McGlockton started the physical altercation and committed the first illegal act by laying hands on Drejka and nobody has a right to get physical b/c of a verbal confrontation...NOBODY. LOL...Drejka "had a pretty long time" to realize that an aggressive/hostile drug addict with a history of assault wasn't going to attack him AGAIN???......what do you call a long time??? He had maybe 1-2 seconds to make a decision while McGlockton was repositioning to do god knows what else in that instant. He could've been retreating, getting ready to attack again, pull his own firearm or other weapon...no way for Drejka or anybody else to know in that quick instant. That's why it was a justified shooting per legal experts.
@MarvNoGood I'd say if the judge didn't want to punish him for being a wannabe parking lot cop and if the jury wasn't afraid of retaliation and violence in the streets had they found him innocent he wouldn't be in prison right now. It was another anti-white racially-motivated injustice.
@clara That's what I thought, Clara...and nobody is arguing here...we're all just chatting and discussing differing opinions but, like many in here, your parents did a horrendous job raising you so you can't handle a differing opinion calmly and either get triggered into rage or you refuse to communicate and run away. I get it.
@Sabrason WTF……….”a confident, experienced and law abiding gun owner”….are you serious?? He was a gun owner, he had a responsibility to avoid confrontations including any other situation which might require him to use his gun. Everyone around him warned him about his unacceptable behaviour. He was told to stop confronting and harassing people. So what does he do? He decides to carry his gun next time he harasses people. This guy is dumb! He went out of his way to confront the lady. This is not an isolated incident. Others testified in court that Drejka made threats to use his gun and kill. He should not have been given a concealed weapon permit. Like the judge said “believe your eyes” he lied to the police, not realising the entire incident was on cctv. He deserves to rot in prison. He shot and killed a man over a car parking incident….seriously…is that was America is reduced to….killing each other over a car park! He did not have either the right or the authority to confront and harass people over a car parking infringement. He most likely stalked the car park, waiting for his victim. This guy most likely has mental health issues. No one in their right mind would get involved in this situation. The judge summed it up perfectly, Drejka is a wannabe cop. Smile Drejka, you are on candid camera…..haha
@Sabrason two and a half seconds is not a “split second” Drejka had sufficient time to make a reasonable decision….gotta love how defendants choose to wear glasses in court…..must think it gives them credibility…….ha ha ha ha……only in America can you be killed over a car park infringement!
@LJ B clearly what I think is true, if there's people as entitled as you who think people should be allowed to carry weapons that can kill in an instant.
@Acedman190 Bro, it's very simple: because the criminal justice system has become politicized and controlled by the angry, afrocentric left so jurors are afraid of retaliation and local government officials are afraid of leftard rioting and looting in the streets. That's why.
@Gabriel T Yes, a confident, experienced gun owner. A wannabe cop for sure, but my point remains the same. There are 300 million guns in America owned by over 100 million law-abiding gun owners including me. Get use to it.
His whole argument was that there was a woman parked in a handicapped spot when she shouldn't have been. So, in order to confront her, he parks ILLEGALLY next to her. Hypocrite
@Peter Brown Police are trained and employed to determine and use the best strategy and also reasonable responses. They wouldn't park illegally to confront someone, who was causing no danger to the public or herself
If that was all he did, he wouldn't be getting interrogated. He thinks he's a normal, average guy?! Thank God he is not. He most definitely is racist, in my opinion, but whether his hatred stems from that, or not, this man should not be freed. The man who was shot, did not deal with the situation very well, but he wasn't pointing a gun at the defendant!
I do feel that the gun laws in the United States, are so out dated. I know the second amendment is like a religious deity to some Americans, but the intellect and training needed to responsibly own a firearm is seldom attained. And as we know there are far too many deaths because ordinary citizens use their firearms without assessing the situation and drawing on adequate professional training!
@Bendygedy 100% You should be required training even if you know how to handle a weapon. There should also be restrictions on what weapons a normal citizen is able to have. There's no need for us to have AK-47's for self-defense. In Australia, they have guns. But they do extensive research and background checks on the purchaser and take many other precautions. And guess what, there are no school shootings over there even though they have guns.
@hi thisthers I was certain it was you who stated earlier that you so no reason to allow Citizens firearms such Ak47s and also, am I confusing you with a different person, or did you make a comment about people who hold the 2nd amendment sacred treat it almost like a religion?
@Simon Black I don't believe I brought race into it! The shooter very well may have been a racist. One thing is for sure, that being pushed doesn't warrant murder or manslaughter. That man was deranged. I feel so sorry for all the victims loved ones. His wife, his children, his family and friends, and him for losing his life.
@Sheila Hammond how I feel about the loss of a life, is irrelevant about my 2nd amendment right. I think it was Fort Henry? An entire fleet of British ships had their cannons and weapons trained on the American flag. The British Admiral commanded the troops (Americans soldiers) take down that flag, or we will obliterate it. Our boys refused. For hours into the night, they fired on Fort Henry and the flag. At times it would disappear in the smoke, reappear standing, but on an angle. The flag stayed up all night. In the morning, it became visible why the flag couldn't be shot down. Because every time it was, another soldier came out to hold that flag up. The pile of dead soldiers is why the flag couldn't be shot down. I get choked up every time I think about that. I can never repay those brave men. But I will be damned if I don't fight for what they stood for. Freedom is everyone's job, responsibility. Not just some guy 250 years ago.
@hi thisthers I never understood why people think they know what another person's emotional state is. Why is that even part of your comments? Okay, the original comment comes from that "Benygendy" person who claims the 2nd amendment is out dated. Then, YOU , yes, YOU replied by stating there should be restrictions, and people don't need AK47S. you said that. I'm responding to that.
@hi thisthers I'll answer your question. Then answer mine. My point is, too many people have a point of view about the 2nd amendment, but their point of view has no factual information, and that is dangerous. I can, and already have elaborated on that. QUESTION: Can you provide a definition of assault rifle, or admit that you didn't understand the phrase in the first place?
@Simon Black oh dear you are upset. First of all I have a point of view, which if you don’t like is fine by me. Second, you are allowed guns,and I didn’t say they should be taken away. Third, I don’t see the problem in making people safer in the use of firearms, through education, and the need to address any problems by people who are a bit unhinged. Or stupid for that matter! Fourth you can spot the stupid and the unhinged by the way they highlight things in block capitals ,as if shouting. Fifth , the government here doesn’t execute anybody. And we don’t carry guns. Sixth 🇬🇧
@Stephanie folks, we have one of those special ones here. FIRST OF ALL, I WAS BORN AND RAISED IN THE ACTUAL WORLD, NOT CYBER FLAKE LAND. THIS ISN'T ME SCREAMING, I DO THIS FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE A HARD TIME FOCUSING ON WHAT THEY SAY, MUCH LESS ME. WHAT DO I MEAN? YOU NOW CLAIM YOU DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT GUNS BEING TAKEN AWAY . BUT A FEW COMMENTS AGO? "I DON'T THINK PEOPLE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO OWN AK47S. IT WORKED OUT GOOD IN AUSTRALIA " YOU MEAN WHERE THEY TOOK AWAY THE GUNS FROM PEOPLE? oh brother. Sigh... When people can't keep track of what I say, I can understand that. But when they don't bother to pay attention to their own words? I start scratching my head wondering why I bothered to listen. WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU ASKING ME TO DEFINE AN ASSAULT RIFLE? THERE'S NO SUCH THING?!?! YOU ARE THE PERSON WHO USED THAT SILLY, CARTOON CHARACTER WORD. TELL ME, IF YOU SEE A RABBIT, DO YOU THINK YOU'RE LOOKING AT BUGS BUNNY?
@Bendygedy and oh brother, do you read like every third word out of a sentence? I didn't say every country, I said most countries with a military. Tell you what, want to look like really bad if I give you the long list of countries that did?
Except that it wasn't illegal parking if it's private property. :)
Handicapped spots are illegal by the law, parking in two spots, etc, isn't illegal on private property (and why you don't get a ticket from them). For example, in a WalMart or a quick-e-mart.
hi thisthers I totally agree with you. I hate guns and in Florida, they carry them around like chapstick. Luckily where I live it’s against the law. The guy was definitely wrong for taking that man’s life. I am a black disabled woman and it’s highly irritating to see someone in a handicap parking spot who should not be there. The suspect had other choices. I have had cars ticketed and towed because of a spot I needed. I just think that in today’s crazy world with so many angry people in the US, the least you can do is not park in handicap spots. I am black and I find where I live that it’s always blacks that I encounter parking wrongfully. That’s all I am trying to say.
I mean saying "yes I wouldn't have shot him" would have been an exceptionally bad choice for him, because it would essentially have him admit that shooting was a mistake and that he should be punished.
@wesb2410 You are as wrong about the concept of self-defence as the murderer in this video. There should be no doubt in any sane mind that it was a mistake to shoot him. The jury is not there to determine if it was "good to shoot him" as it is obvious to everyone on court that it was a mistake- the man bleeded to death in front of his children over a parking lot argument... The only question is if he was threatened enough to justify his mistake of shooting him. To regret the loss of life would only do him good.
@wesb2410 Not sure why that would even be a thought. The obvious answer for someone who had to kill in self defense and isnt a psychopath is "I would change whatever I could so that a man didn't have to die."
@Jordan Martin That's not what manslaughter and murder are. Manslaughter is killing someone intentionally and unjustly without thinking about it beforehand. Murder is carrying out a plan to kill someone.
@Soleilune Doesn't matter what should happen. He's not going to sit up there and confess to fucking up before the trial. Nobody would, that would be fucking stupid.
@atheistmecca Clearly. The point is that even if it was self defense, he's clearly fine with having a man's death on his hands. It also makes it even more difficult to believe that he thought his life was actually in danger because if he did, you would at least expect that he would regret letting himself end up in that position. I think this all makes it pretty clear that he had been wanting a chance to shoot and kill someone for awhile and legit thought this was his chance to get away with it.
As someone who is actually disabled, and has the right to use disabled parking, and who rarely does so, I too have a pet peeve with people using disabled parking. However, first off, I am not a parking enforcement officer, and two, I sometimes forget to put my placard on the mirror. I am an amputee and only use disabled parking if I can't use my prosthesis or I am hurting that day. It blocks my view so I have to take it down to drive. Unless it's your job to enforce the law, don't. Call the police, take a picture of the violator and pass it to the police, but don't confront people. People who use disabled parking illegally are entitles assholes. You are very likely to find yourself in a fight. It's a very petty thing to get in a fight about. Even if you know you can hold your own in a fight, the other party could be armed or just a better fighter than you are. No one is going to think you a hero for telling off assholes.
I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said, these kinds of incidents wouldn't be so common if people would just stop policing each other like this.
in San Francisco we have a problem with people breaking into apartment complexes and folks in the buildings feel the need to police instead of following what most apartments tell residents which is to report suspicious activities to police or security but they don't listen, then you have to hear about it in the news.
@jairtzinio I used to own a sporty little 4X4. I once parked in disabled parking because I wasn't wearing my leg. I got out, standing on one foot, but before I was able to grab my crutches this guy got in my face and started yelling at me. I just looked down and asked, "Isn't having just one foot considered a "disability?" This happened in Fairfield, by the way. But now I live in Oregon. I grew up in Fairfield. I have very steady balance on one foot, because I lost my leg when I was just 3 years old.
@Eric Taylor Great comment . It's just not worth the hassle . Marquis should've learned to count till ten also though, the way he immediately pushed Drejka to the ground , and kept towering over him.
Another driver saw Drejka going for a gun and ran while Marquis kept hanging around for over a second, which was an eternity in this situation ......2:23
i once was so exhausted after a 14 hour shift i parked unknowingly in a handicapped space, came out to.a police officer who questioned my morality and tried to shame me, and with my sincere response saying i had no idea he said yeah right and i got a ticket.
@PaulLonden And how would you respond if you saw someone yelling at your wife? Is Marquis suppose to just bow down and say "Yes massa, whatever you say. I's just the dumb nigga here."? Marquis was not the aggressor, the white guy was the aggressor, and that is why he was convicted. He had EVERY right to push the guy down. In fact, had Marquis been armed and pulled his gun out to shoot the black guy, THAT would have been ruled self deference. I grant you, the lady was wrong parking in disabled parking, but that was a matter for parking enforcement. It's not even a traffic infraction. The guy was wrong to say anything at all.
@Eric Taylor .... I probably wrongly got out of your comment , that it's not worth the misery to stand on your immediate rights , which might result in disaster. Both sides in this case blundered. It's obvious ofcourse Drejka is guilty of (premeditated ) manslaughter.
@Eric Taylor you dont need to insert racist ideology into this situation. And your plainly wrong when you say this man was the aggressor. He was pushed down after being physically dominated by a larger man. I disagree with this man being a busy body and confronting theses folks parked in the handicapped spot, nor do i condone him shooting the other man. But he clearly reacted. Wrongly to the other mans aggression.
@The Human Journey You deserved to get a ticket, even though it was a mistake. Most people can be motivated to be careful not to do something like that by mistake. Others require more motivation. If you made a mistake, fine, pay the fine and be more careful next time.
@C. J. Lau You clearly didn't read my comment properly, otherwise you would understand why I used "racist ideology" He was pushed down after verbally assaulting someone's wife. Are you telling me you would not attack someone who was attacking your wife?
@ilaDali What case do you think I'm trying to make here? To be clear, my case here is, one should not confront others over minor things like this unless it's your job to do so.
I think there’s an app where people can send in pics of someone using a handicapped spot when they shouldn’t be, bc honestly cops don’t want to be bothered with that stuff, but also people need to not be using the spot if they don’t need it.
I ABSOLUTELY agree with everything you said and only wished that Marquis hadn't resort to "pushing" someone when he could've easily just talked or asked Drejka "what's the problem" and not to scream at his wife with their kids present. Had Marquis not chosen violent over staying cool and calmly talking to Drejka while resolving the situation...Marquis could've gone home with his life and family that day...Smh
People who choose to deal everyday's problems with "violent" will always get more "violent problems" in return. Two wrongs WILL NEVER make a right! So, had these two hot headed idiots kept their "cool" on that day...they could've enjoy the rest of their lives with their loved ones. Such USELESS idiots & morons of the world...lol smh
Educated and reasonable people DO NOT use violent to resolve situations in life... "Sometimes you have to be a lion so you can be a lamb that you really are" great saying from Dave Chappelle's mom to him as a teenager. Means a person has to learn to talk their point across strongly so they can live a life not involved in physicality.
@Google User I do agree, but for the "Educated and reasonable people DO NOT use violent to resolve situations in life" I would drop the "educated" part of the statement. You can be uneducated and responsible, while an educated person can be irresponsible and a hot head.
I am not "officially" educated (I have no degree) but I still know things and I consider myself fairly responsible. At the same time you have a guy like Trump, who is said to be educated and he does have a degree, but he is still ignorant and irresponsible. I agree that Marquis should have got in the guy's face before pushing him, but he was not the aggressor, and he was backing off when the gun came out. You can't put yourself in this situation, then claim self deference. Even if you have a permit to carry, and the situation is 100% self deference, if you use your gun it will cost you at least $10000 because even if you are 100% justified you are going to get sued, and there will be an extensive investigation if a life is lost. This guy got a gun so he could have the confidence to be aggressive with others. He was looking for an excuse to use the gun.
@Eric Taylor Yes, while I agree that Drejka was definitely "trigger happy" and being very aggressive with his belief. Marquis acting like a "thug" with violent (which escalated the bad situation real quick) then, he's going to be met with violent in returned. Both are at equal FAULTS and should've choose better...be better as human beings. Neither of these idiots were ever "right" in their own reactions or caused.
@Google User Well, I think Marquis had the right to defend his family, and his over aggressive attitude got him killed, had he survived, would he have been charged with assault? Is the murder charge against Drejka appropriate? I think it should be yes to both questions.
@Eric Taylor Listen man, you really need to let this go and admit that "it is what it is". Both of these idiots are clearly in the wrong on ALL of their actions which have lead to their now "really bad" out comes...like i said before. Two wrongs don't make a right. Neither one of them were "right" in their own actions...PERIOD! Smh
@Google User And what part of my comment makes you think I don't agree with that? Besides the "It is what it is" comment, yes, both of these guys were wrong. But this guy was looking for a situation where he could have the opportunity to shoot someone. This is why he was convicted of murder.
There was a case in the UK where a lady and her husband parked in a disabled bay of a supermarket. They had gone inside but forgotten their bags? and so the husband had came back out to get them from the car. While at the car he was verbally attacked by a male in a vehicle in the parking lot. The male accused the husband of not being disabled or needing the blue badge (needed to park in a disabled bay). He continued to attack the husband and then got out the car and punched the husband killing him. Whilst in custody the male was questioned and he alluded to the catalyst of the argument being that the husband didn't have the right to park there because he had no visible disabilities, then the police informed him that he was in fact shopping with his wife and that it was her that was disabled. It was all captured on CCTV and the interview too, all available to watch online. I think it's called 'One punch kill' or something along those lines. A tragic lesson of minding your own business
@T3ddySpaghetti To kill over a parking violation is just stupid. Also, not all disabilities are visible. I walk into the store to get an electric cart for my elderly neighbor to use, then I put it back after she is done shopping. If anyone ever asks, I just explain what I'm doing. It's never a problem.
@Maryflor Frias How is Fairfield these days. I've been living in Oregon for 15 years. There are several celebrities from Fairfield, including some who went to my high school (Fairfield High). When I was their there was only 2 highs schools. Armijo and Fairfield. Now I think there are 5.
@I R Putting your hands on anyone in an unwelcome way is assault. However, in that case, he could have argued he was defending his family against an aggressor. In this case, I'm not sure he would have been successful. The reason the shooter's self deference argument failed was HE WAS THE AGGRESSOR
@Eric Taylor How was he the initial aggressor when he only verbally argued, until being assaulted by the person coming out of the store? Being an asshole doesn't automatically make you the aggressor.
@I R Did you bother reading my comment? I said the pusher could argue he was defending his family. I didn't say he was right to push the guy down. However, yelling at someone DOES aromatically make you the aggressor. Imagine you accidentally rear end someone in traffic. The other driver gets out and starts screaming at you. Would you say that other driver is being aggressive? Would you feel safe staying in that situation? Would you be justified in leaving the scene of the accident? This guy wasn't just arguing. He was yelling at the driver.
@Eric Taylor I did and found them to be unreasonable. "He who begins, a quarrel or dispute, either by threatening or striking another. No man may strike another because he has threatened, or in consequence of the use of any words."
Either by threatening or striking.
There is definitive evidence that he did not strike the vehicle's occupant and it is also impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he threatened the occupant.
He was physical and confrontational in his approach toward a car filled with a family. Marquis pushed him in order to diffuse this confrontation out of concern for his family’s well being
@Daniel G Was it this guys job to enforce parking laws? No, it was not. He stated that he had the gun as an "equalizer" for exactly these sorts of situations. Did I say he had every right to push him down? I don't think he did, so I doubt I said it, unless I was quoting some other person. In the end, this guy had no right to shoot the man who pushed him. If you walk around shouting at people, you are going to get hit sooner or later, regardless if it is right or wrong.
As someone who has been to prison for two years and seen some shit I can tell you, he is about to see a lot more trouble over the next 20 years as well. This time however, the coward won't have a gun to deal with the trouble that he causes.
He’s sitting in prison right now thinking he did nothing wrong and was railroaded by an anti-white male society. He’ll get out with the same sociopath attitude.
@SPIDERM0OSE ye completely rational to shoot people when they push you, like geez, pushing ppl is the mist direct sign that they are probably going to kill you
@siberwolf33 Why would he do that when we live in a simple world where the designated perfect people wear white hats & get victimised by the evil bad guys who wear black hats.
0 likes
Henrik Hempel2019-11-07 09:00:36 (edited 2019-11-07 09:02:38 )
@SPIDERM0OSE in what way was it life threatening for the shooter, and do u really think you can justify a killing through "he failed to show enough respect"? Hope you have a good time binge watching alex jones though
This guy doesn’t strike me as someone who does a lot of thinking to begin with so I doubt he’ll have come up with an insightful thought in the next 20 years...
@Lady Kdog 17 well if the "lady" was not breaking the law and taking advantage of the handicapped people of the community. He wouldn't of said anything at all. Just another person sick of seeing lawbreakers turn his community into 💩 nice victim blaming. As I recall the law breakers boyfriend came out with out saying a word and assaulted somebody. Great people
@LyssaGames I totally understand the point @Dystroxy TG is making, but I am not sure I understand your point? Don't you know that it is illegal to shoot someone who is retreating and poses no risk no matter how you may feel about them? 🙃
@Cybertech66 it’s both legally and morally wrong. Of course it’s illegal, but it’s also a terrible thing to do.
I saw a few comments where people said the husband shouldn’t have pushed the shooter to begin with, so I’m saying no matter how you feel about the pushing, shooting him was wrong, both legally and morally (so completely). That is exactly what my comment is saying.
@LyssaGames I was being facetious and just joking. I totally understood your point and was merely playing on the fact @Dystroxy TG repeated your comment, so I repeated it again. 😉
@Maximilian Raley I don't disagree with that. I think people went inside and told the guy that someone was in the parking lot cursing out his girlfriend so he came out hot. That mistake cost him his life, but it shouldn't have. No winners here.
@Cybertech66 Absolutely not. I've had someone confront my fiance for the exact same thing. We had a handicapped placard though and they said we didn't "look" disabled. Whatever that means. I ran out. I didn't run up to the guy, just ran close enough that I could see what was happening. I walked up calmly and introduced myself as the ladys fiance and then we talked about it. The craziest part is we walked away from that with us both disagreeing. He didn't like that we didn't appear handicapped. I told him she had scoliosis and such. He didn't want to hear it and cussed me out. Sure i could have gotten aggressive back but that serves no purpose. As adults we need to start choosing our battles far more wisely and stop thinking the aggressive one is somehow the winner.
But Brotha should have maintained his temper by not putting his hands on Drejka. Regardless, like it or not, Drejka is still alive and will serve maybe 35 percent of his 20 year sentence.
@Poker Joker 100% agree. bro shouldnt have pushed him. man was tryna be a hero in front of his girl and unfortunately caused his demise. i personally would never shoot someone if they werent a threat but i would also never be treated like sh.t either, especially if i wasnt causing no sort of physical altercation. big bro was asking for trouble when he pushed him to the ground, and even though shooting him was not the right thing to do, i don’t completely blame him for doing so.
@saintretep I agree with you , it’s sad and should not have happened, but the guy was in the right I feel.. I mean would u let some random guy come up and push u down like that ?he also looked like he was going to keep attacking him , The guy was acting way to tough for his own good. I feel sorry for him and his kid.. but the dude really put himself in that situation
Yea the girl shouldn’t have parked there in the first place. She gets out of the car when her an who got shot comes up and pushes the guy when they were just yelling. They’re all at fault.
I mean, TrayVonTe JuWan Jenkins or whatever Drejka's "victim's" name was would be alive if he hadn't committed an unjustified assault on a much older man who was in no way a threat to Shaniqua.
There's this thing called the totality of the situation. When someone pushes you down, then steps towards you to do something else (as the video shows), and then steps back when you produce a weapon, you don't know if he's retreating or if he's turning to pull a weapon out of sight.
The jury got this 100% wrong. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes, for both the murdered man and the defendant here.
Yeah, i mean he stood by the car a long time, he sure was waiting to shoot someone. He probably almost shot the kids and the wife in the car. I'm just glad the comment section understands that this is not a back white issue. Problem is both had anger issues, its an anger contest, the one with more anger "won"? idk.
@FIREBLACK 74.14 “the news” eh? Last “unprovoked shooting” i heard of was a dude who attacked a cop with a rock and tried to steal his gun, after attacking several other couples and stealing a car. Got any others more recent? Sounds like you see at least a couple hundred every year
There have been all types of murders lately. This is certainly not the America I once knew. I get along with everyone. Sensitive subjects are just not discussed and we can still enjoy ourselves. America is just not a happy place to live anymore. I stay solely to myself. That helps relieve my stress and anxiety because people have gone nuts everywhere.
@William Parker Actually you can. Someone stepping backwards isn't a retreat, it can be to conceal pulling a weapon, etc. Here's a good video of someone walking away who ended up shooting a police officer...
@Maximilian Raley I agree. I don't understand this vigilante mentality that is seemingly erupting. I had a handicapped parking permit for my mother who suffered from congestive heart failure. I had let her off at the door of a store and then parked in a handicapped space with permit displayed as I would be escorting my mother back to the car. I went into the store to join my mother. When we returned to the car, there was a scribbled note on our windshield in the most foul language accusing us of fraudulent use of the handicapped space. People, YOU ARE NOT THE POLICE. Call the police if you perceive an issue. DO NOT TAKE ON THIS RESPONSIBILITY WHICH IS NOT YOURS!!
@LyssaGames its either that or starve to death. You would choose starvation over stopping the person who is trying to take your means of survival? I think you're just virtue signaling at this point.
no it is not. it is sadly the result of the law. threating the aggressor and brandishing the gun usually comes always with a penalty for the victim, shooting the aggressor should be covered under Floridas stand your ground law. if the skin color would be reversed no one would line up and march for the guy who got shot
True, the act of the guy was killed was to aggressive, but the shooter, he was to angry and he shoots not because he was on danger o losing he’s life, because is was to angry.
True, the act of the guy was killed was to aggressive, but the shooter, he was to angry and he shoots not because he was on danger o losing he’s life, because is was to angry.
@James Edward Sterling no really I wouldn’t. I can go another day without food, I’ll survive, or I know several people who would give me food. Shooting someone in the back over food is something only a friendless coward would do.
@LyssaGames What if someone kept taking from you every day? Everything you traded your labor for, they stole. You would essentially be a slave. Nothing wrong with taking the life of those who act like cockroaches. After all, humans are just animals, and I'm not saying you should take pride in having to kill someone, I'm just saying that sometimes its necessary to kill other animals for your own survival. Food for thought.
@James Edward Sterlingthat is an entirely different situation from this one or the one you described. You’re just trying to up the ante to get me to say “okay yes I would kill them” at this point.
@LyssaGames The point I'm trying to make is that shooting someone in the back can sometimes be justified. Sometimes that should be left to the discretion of the victim. YOU yourself may not shoot someone who has robbed you and is running away, but that shouldn't be any of your business if a victim decides they WANT to shoot their assailant as they try to flee. This is how the world should work if we want to decrease the amount of criminals victimizing others.
Some people still try to defend the shooter by saying it is self defense despite it not being so whatsoever. If people are this confuse on to what counts as self defense then I am scared to go outside with my child.
Who knows what his intentions were when pushing him to the ground… when you feel your life is in danger you do some pretty wild things. Not saying it’s okay to kill someone but if things got out of hand he could have been the one killed. You always have to look out for yourself in this sick world.
@ProdByPrimal Who knows what my intentions are walking down the street towards you? How far do we extend this logic? Is it to the point where violence occurs? Who knows my intent in flicking my best friend? Is it to the point of obvious physical confrontation? Who knows some guy's intent in getting into a bar fight with some other guy who hit on his wife? Are we really going to argue that anyone that gets shoved or punched or attacked in any way has the right to shoot their attacker?
@Tojki no I’m not saying that at all, it’s a lot different if it’s your friend rather than a complete stranger. I’m not justifying that it’s right to shoot someone or kill anyone. The situation could have been handled without lethal force. Obviously this man thought his life was in danger.
Looked to me as if he got shot in the front not the back only retreating after the man had shot him. Hardly a retreat. I'm not saying what he did was right or wrong because I would have defended my woman and my kid just the same as dude did, and if it was in reverse and I got pushed down I would have got back up and settled it with my hands but I been boxing for a decade and a half and I'm a very able bodied person so if I wasn't it's hard to say. It does seem a bit aggressive to shoot him but hey it's a bit aggressive to shove a handicap person to the ground when it was their fault for parking in a handicap spot in the first damn place.
@Leeartlee completely agree, gun owners like the manchild in this video who treat their guns like toys are the reason gun advocates look bad. What’s insane to me is there are people in this comment section who seen the beginning footage of marquis backing away from the gun, watching the psychological examination in the video, and the guilty verdict and still think that he was in any way in the right.
End if story shooting the guy was wrong. And honestly I think he had rights to push the guy as he was defending his wife...though maybe a bit excessive.
@caleb masters You don't have the right to assault somebody just because of an argument. It's also not a good idea as it will only escalate the situation.
Are you people serious!? Listen, I am liberal for the most part. I do think everyone has the right to own a gun tho. But wrong is wrong.
The black guy assaulted the guy first! The white guy was just talking and didn't do anything illegal.
You can say he was annoying or whatever but he didn't assault anyone. It's a free country. First ammendment. Say what you want but when you put your hands on someone and push them that hard to the ground, I no longer view you as the victim but the aggressor.
The black guy only retreated after he saw the gun pointed at him. It didn't matter if he was walking back at that point. The crime of assault was already committed. I am tired of my fellow liberals defending the suspects and victims of police violence no matter what they do. Resisting arrest, punching and cop, driving away, etc.
No one deserves to die for it but obey the law! Don't assault someone. Period. I dont feel bad for the guy who got killed in this situation at all. His girlfriend said, do I need to go get my man. They were the aggressors. The white guy was just annoying and nosy. But they were parked in the handicap parking spot which is also ILLEGAL!!!
@Milky Way It absolutely matters that he was walking back, why do you think he got jailed for 20 years? Aggressor or not, this wasn't self defence, he was no longer a threat, nor would he have been without the gun. I'm not saying the assault was justified, assault is still assault, but the shooter was looking for trouble and committing an assault doesn't justify you to shoot somebody retreating. If you don't feel sorry for his death, then how can you believe nobody deserves to die for it? Also, the shooter was parked in an illegal spot as well, so that's a double standard.
I completely agree BUT maybe he wouldnt have got shot if he didnt push him? Dont immediately resort to violence, use your words like a grown adult, they both effed up here.
I agree it was totally unnecessary and could have been completely avoided.
I could if he pushed him and then went on top of him and started punching the crap out of him but it was one push and then he backed off which is what you are supposed to do and then if that person that is pushed escalates it from there then its the next persons turn and on and on.
That guy should never have been allowed a gun but of course its never that simple, AND Michael Drejka arrived and parked perpendicular to Jacobs’ car, was also illegally parked and blocking alternate access to that same ramp. Furthermore, while both Drejka and McGlockton were regular customers, the store’s owner, Abdalla “Ali” Salous (not present at the time of the shooting), said he had previously had issues with Drejka at his business. Another customer, Richard Kelly, told Spectrum News that he had an interaction with Drejka after parking in the same improperly marked handicapped parking space weeks prior to the fatal shooting.
@L4m3nt0 Verbal and physical conflict are two different things. Screaming and cursing never killed anyone. Not defending Drejka here, but there are enough cases of people dying, after someone pushed them. Not even to mention throwing someone. Completely stupid and dangerous thing to do
That's what people get taught. I've always been told that if someone picks up a gun or brings it with them, that they are fully prepared to use it to kill something so it shouldn't have ever been about whether it was legal to carry the gun
Yeah, so what? He was a calm, experienced and confident gun owner who DID use it correctly and responded to a hostile aggressor in a very limited and measured way considering he only shot one, well-place bullet AFTER being violently assaulted by an aggressive drug addict.
@Sabrason I beg to differ, as the prosecutor stated clear as day he was justified in pulling the weapon, but considering the victim (who isn't a drug addict) was not only backing off, but was already a considerable distance from the defendant, AND was unarmed, he was completely and utterly unjustified to fire. Which is why I believe he should rot in jail, as he not only killed a man while not justified to, but is also a threat to society in my eyes.
@ChrisW Stop lying. McGlockton had several amphetamines like Molly in his system which causes, among other things, aggressive/violent behavior....look it up. He was a drug addict with a history of assaulting a police officer so he thought he could lay hands on people and did so in front of his little kids....not exactly a healthy father figure and certainly no model citizen. He also took 2-3 additional steps TOWARDS Drejka AFTER the push which would make any normal person who was violently pushed to the ground and injured reasonably fear further bodily harm which justifies the use of lethal force = classic SYG law which is why many national legal experts agreed. McGlockton slightly turning his body to one side meant nothing in that instant as he could've just as easily been repositioning to pull his own firearm so Drejka had NO choice but to fire. This is basic common sense. Had McGlockton immediately put his hands up and said "don't shoot" I could agree with you but he didn't. Any opinion to the contrary relies on hindsight and additional information obtained long AFTER the fact that Drejka did not have at the moment of the conflict.
@Lancaster Oh yeah, and Drejka's single, well-placed bullet hit center mass (albeit a tad to the left b/c McGlockton half-turned at the last instant) ripping through the lung and heart and forced a guy high on Molly to run and hide before bleeding out. Threat neutralized. That's what I call phenomenal self defense!! I only hope my training allows me to perform as well with my .357 Magnum if/when the time comes.
The Real Maxis2021-06-17 22:10:13 (edited 2021-06-17 22:10:38 )
I think law enforcement should already be looking into Sabrason's identity, as this guy is just as much a threat to society as the criminal in the video. Hopefully nothing happens, but if Sabrason ever commits a crime, it would be nice to have the prosecution use these comments as proof of his crooked mental state.
Moral of the story: Don't do something that could bother crazy people, even like parking ilegaly. These loonatics could kill you for something insignificant. They just need a small reason to pull a gun and shoot. This moron was acting like that parking lot was his private propery and that guy was there trespassing with intent of stealing something. Lawyers dressed him in a suit, (probably for the first time in his life) gave him glasses, and instructed him to take notes at the trial (i mean for real, bro lawyer ?) 😂 .. Trying to make him look like a sweet member of high society that was brutally attacked by a bad black man. When the loser was in shorts and slippers for his entire life, watching military training documentaries from his mama's couch.
@Dan _ excuse me but they didn't park illegally. the shooter was the one parked illegally. not to mention why should people have to alter what they do because some people can't keep their gun i their pants
@tierra is lame xx You're excused. Watch the video again. Seems like you've missed the part where his wife's car is parked on a handicap spot. The crazy dude wouldn't have had a reason to start a fight that ended up with a man losing his life, if she parked in front of the store where there were alot of empty spaces. As i've said: Everybody should avoid doing things that could bother the crazy ones. It could make the difference between ending up in a morgue, or at home playing with your kids or watching tv. ✌️
No he’s not, he’s making a valid point. He’s not saying “they parked in a handicapped spot so they got what they deserved” or that “...it’s there fault”, he’s saying that there are crazy people like this guy who are looking for even the most minor things to create conflict from. He’s saying that through avoiding such minor things, in which your avoidance doesn’t really create any extra burden, you avoid the situation of someone getting mad at you for it.
Please take a second to think about someone’s stance/comment before getting mad and belittling someone on the internet ya bum.
He shoved him to the floor NOT bc of a parking spot. It starters over that and he was attacked and then he shot. just like if a person is pulled over for a broken tail light and shoot police I guess they died over a broken tail light.
Sad. But let’s not pretend that the victim also played a role in his own demise. Yelling at someone isn’t a good excuse to get physical with anyone. Two people did stupid shit and one died. It’s like a trashy Greek tragedy.
@Neil Siebenthal Some intelligent fella just explained with a reply, to the ones that are a lil bit slow, what i was saying. Please read my comment again. Maybe you'll get it too. ✌️
@Dan _ Look man, you gotta go into hiding. There are a lot of dangerous types on YouTube, and you cannot go around speaking these kinds of truths. I will have to delete my account after commenting this to you, so don’t waste this opportunity.
@Weezy Peezy Thank you, intelligent and reasonable person ! Looks like there are alot of captains slow (not james may kind of slow) out there. Take care and Stay safe, man ! ✌️
@Fetal Cop If the guy hadnt raised his voice and was actively looking for trouble, as you said, with a gun packed, it wouldnt have happened either, you know that, right? Funny how you consider only one side, namely the man who wants to get the crazy yelling person away from his family with a push is in the wrong, not the lunatic with a gun. And the more people like you defend such instances, the more gun violence will be justified and brushed off as "Oi, he pushed someone, good that he got shot." Sad views.
Three kids lost their dad because he assaulted Billy Badass for a verbal altercation.
7 likes
Kevin Sargeant2020-10-05 03:00:57 (edited 2020-10-05 03:02:02 )
@SalQ I think that the folks you are conversing with already know who is right and who is wrong and have moved on.
They are engaged in the conversation of what the father of three could have done to get himself home safe to see his kids grow up. The father is not in the wrong and I don't think that anyone is saying that he asked for it by his behavior. He is dead though and sometimes there is better than being righteous.
At the end of the day we are all working through that a man that shouldn't be dead is, and a man that probably deserves to be dead isn't. Some of us just wish this hadn't happened so much that we work through the what ifs that would leave the innocent unharmed. Anyway that's how I read things. Take care.
Edit: Okay I read farther down and "anyone" might have been overly optimistic.
@Kevin Sargeant I fully understand your point and the what ifs also do interest me. However, like you probably also now saw after the edit, some people don't see it as an option to think "what if" from the side of the shooter and just put blame on the murdered. It is not a solution to live life on eggshells because of the slight possibility someone loses their temper and unnecessarily shoots. So I fully understand the "What if this man hadnt pushed him but had yelled at him instead" but there's a lack of "What do we change so this wont happen again".
Civilian Expunged Thank you! I’ll say it again... if he would have handled it like a MAN (men talk through problems by the way...not charge at someone like a football linebacker without even knowing the situation) and not like a child. He would still be here....
I hope some of you guys in the comments don't have a wife or girlfriend, because if I come out the store and see a man aggressively talking to my wife or girlfriend I'm doing the same thing..
mathew cuthbert except he didn’t have his weapon out therefore not a shooter in the moment. meaning the father attacked him and hey i don’t agree with shooting him, but people are crazy so always be careful
Jerry Alexander you’re going to attack someone because he’s yelling? and then risk getting shot or even worse your girl?? then how would you feel after she’s dead because you couldn’t control your temper? trust me i don’t think he should’ve shot, but cmon now
@shoo sheep you know what's funny(not funny) is that if the roles were reversed and the black man was yelling at a white woman in the car with her kids and her husband came out and shot the guy that was yelling y'all would be defending that too..
@Dan _ moral of the story is mind your own business, he had no right to approach that woman and yell at her but he has about 20yrs in prison to think about minding his own business
Jerry Alexander what are you talking about? i’m not defending the shooting lol but of course you bring race into this. i said that there are crazy idiots with guns out there and this is what happens when you don’t make the best decision. what you said has nothing to do with what i said and on top of that you of course bring race in even though i’m not white
@shoo sheep defending your wife or girlfriend from a crazy man yelling is what most any other man would've done.. You don't just there and allow a man to yell at your wife and do nothing because he might be crazy or he might have a gun..
@shoo sheep the guy with the gun was the aggressor, he started with that woman in the car, she was minding her own business, HE INITIATED EVERYTHING, and I guarantee he was yelling and being aggressive because he knew he had a gun on him, he felt like he had power and authority because he was carrying.. But he has about 20yrs to think about it now, the best years of his life wasted because he didn't know how to mind his own business
I am a handicapped person. I have mobility trouble and I have handicapped placard. And I would walk from the back on the biggest mall parking lot rather than see someone lose their life over a fuck*ng parking spot. I agree with you. This is a tragedy
bravo1IsixI I mean tbh I think he was just trying to protect the people he loved a lot of people are basically victim blaming they shouldn’t have parked in the spot but it’s still not their fault I genuinely believe he thought that Drejka was going to do something to his girlfriend and just wanted to push him away from her Drejka shouldn’t have acted like some amazing hero protecting the parking lots of Florida everyone has pushed someone before look back at a time you did and then tell me that if you died because of it that it was kind of your fault I mean come on it was a push and he acted like he was tackled by some football player
@Angel Santos US seems like such a terrible place to live in. I just saw another video - a black doctor was arrested in front of his house when he was loading a van by a cop not wearing a mask, also spitting in his face. He had to yell for his whife to come outside and confirm that he lives there. I would have sued that cop for everything he's got. Not the police department. How come it's called the "land of the free", when you can get your freedom away from you, in a finger snap, just because you're sitting in front of your house... 🤦🏻♂️ "American dream" More like american nightmare. :(
@Jerry Alexander He was trying to protect his family by coming out of the store and immediately escalating the situation by shoving the guy? I'm sorry, but that's not how to protect a family. It was a verbal argument, until the guy who got shot made it physical. He didn't deserve to die, but I can't be sad about an asshole like him dying either.
@モチポンズ what are you talking about?? The situation was escalated when the guy pulled up and went to the lady's car and started a confrontation.. 😂😂😂🤦🏾♂️
@Jerry Alexander He told her it's not OK to park in a handicapped spot. We don't see her or him gesturing, so I'm assuming it was only a verbal altercation, no one was getting hurt. People only started to get hurt when the father joined in by immediately shoving the guy so hard he fell to the ground.
@Jerry Alexander Oh and regarding "protector of a family"... are you saying it was the right thing to do for the father to attack the guy, just because he saw him arguing with his wife?
@モチポンズ YES, it was ok to defend his family, if I'm arguing with your wife and you don't do anything about it then you might as well get a divorce right then and there because you'll never be respected in that marriage again 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
@モチポンズ it wasn't his place to tell anybody anything, so soon as he confronted her about a parking spot that is what escalated the situation.. If he minds his own business then he wouldn't be spending the best years of his life in prison 🤷🏿♂️, I hope that parking spot was worth 20yrs of his life 🤷🏿♂️
@モチポンズ bottom line is he had a gun and felt like he was a big bad authority figure and was looking for confrontation, now he has 20yrs to think about his errors, end of story ✌🏿
@Dan _ the black guy wasn't shot over a parking spot, he was shot over assaulting a man. And while I think he shouldn't have been shot in the first place, the guy had no business assaulting him.
@Jerry Alexander the reaction, from a normal person, to a verbal argument is to de-escalate the situation verbally. the father initiated the violence. you are just mad that your fellow black man lost.
@Dan _ the parking spot is not what got the black dude killed. what got him killed was him shoving the guy to the ground. the black dude initiated the violence but was not prepared to finish it.
@Artruis Joew that guy is 47 years old, he'll be damn near 70 by the time he's out, that's if he doesn't die in prison, and hopefully he can get through his 20yrs without being beaten and or raped.. It's safe to say that both of their lives ended on that day, all because a guy with gun tried to play police.. It's a shame, smh
@S Con yes one person lost their life and everyone else life has been affected forever all because someone thought that they were the police because they had a gun.. It's a truly Sad story 😔
@Dan _ An alternative would be a civilised world where a threatening second Ammandement doesnt excist and people don't execute self justice upon each other.
Neil Siebenthal Dude would still be alive today if he hadn’t shoved a dude half his size that was zero threat to him or his family so hard that he bounced off the fucking parking lot. Drejka would be free today if he had called the police over the parking lot if he felt the need to do something.
@Weezy Peezy think about ur own logic: These crazy people will find any minor thing to attack u over.. So even if u do everything right THEY WILL STILL FIND SOMETHING if that's their intention. It is easy to pick a fight with someone over nothing. The family being in the handicap parking spot had nothing to do with his obvious dream to kill someone and get away w it via "self defense." He purposefully started confrontations w random people on the road on multiple occasions.
@Dan _ i think the killer should maybe be at fault? it is not her fault that hes crazy, and a handicap spot is not, at all, a reason to shoot and kill someone
@bigbodyrover you act like dan was saying the shooting was justified. Dan was talking about how to avoid a situation that ended up with the father dead because he got violent over a verbal altercation. You people are wild do you also support antifa as well?
@Jerry Alexander and youll likely end up getting shot for assaulting someone like the father did here. This is what i dont understand with people now that they think it is remotely ok to become violent over a VERBAL ALTERCATION. The father could of VERBALLY defended his wife rather then physically assault the guy which lead to his own demise. Not victim blaming but like people need to act civilized for fuck sakes.
@Cynicalsinner91 bruh he wasnt even trying to be violent he was literally pushing him away from his girlfriend its not like he went up and tried to beat the crap outta him
@mathew cuthbert he ran up behind and shoved him. I hate to break it to you but that falls under being violent. Why couldnt he walked up and ask what the the fuck is going on instead of shoving the dude from behind? Why is it such an odd stance to not react to something verbal with something physical?
@Cynicalsinner91 your logic makes no sense. You're saying it's not ok to escalate from arguing to shoving but it is ok to escalate from shoving to killing.. I swear some of you folks just be saying anything, you all are out here defending the offenders better than their lawyers.. 😂😂😂🤦🏾♂️
@Jerry Alexander i never once said it was kosher for the guy to shoot him, in a comment earlier i said the shooter should be fried for what he did. I also said both played the stupid game and won a stupid prize. But its ok be selective about what i said. Take it easy bub
@Jerry Alexander Son, I've been in this kind of situation, and the man I was with didn't even have to say a word...he walked over and got the little twerp to back off. This young man did NOT deserve to die. But unless that dipwad was moving towards me, or putting hands on me, the guy I was with wouldn't have pushed the twerp.
Apparently there were several previous incidents of him drawing his gun at people for really minor things (like if he thought they were driving too slowly etc) so this guy is a danger to society. It was only a matter of time before he killed someone.
@Southern Soul that makes absolutely no sense. The word 'thug' has obvious racial connotations, knowing these connotations do not make you racist alone. When you start using this word in the context you just did (saying you're happy that this person died) is when it becomes racist. Next you'll say that knowing the meaning of the n word makes you racist, that would be pretty silly obviously. It's okay that you don't know that though, we all have to learn!
i saw all the thuggish behavior i can imagine. First he stops in the only one place he shouldnt, then his girl sees hes coming, he puts his pants in its place and she gets out the car just perfect timing for him to become unnoticed, then the first thing he does is to kick his ass to the floor... the killer is a killer, but the thug is a thug, and the lady is not exactly a lady
@Oxey I always associated "thug" with anybody violent or criminal. The douchebag murderer was clearly several feet from the car of the lady he was arguing with when and a man shoved him hard enough for him to fall several feet. Any rational and normal person would have come outside and either yelled at him to back away from his car or if they're extra normal they would have just talked and maybe even apologized for parking in a handicapped spot.
Further, after a bit of research the origin of thug has nothing to do with black people, and I can find no evidence supporting your theory that it has ever been racially charged. The only thing I found that can associate thug with black people is the idea that thugs are generally "gangsters" which a large proponent of black people consider themselves to be gangsters. On this note, it would be stereotyping to consider all black people gangsters and thus thugs, which I wont do. The fact that you want to reserve a word like thug for an entire race of people is in and of itself rather racist in my opinion, of which I will have no part of.
Perhaps you should take a moment to reflect and instead turn to a quote by MLK “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
@Southern Soul maybe he wasn't the nicest person but i think pushing the guy yelling at your wife is something bad but not insane, now shooting a guy you don't know and the only think you know is he pushed you but backed up once he saw the weapon is intentional murder You gotta be crazy if you think killing people is fine just because they were angry or agressive when you could end it just pulling the gun out
@king which is why everyone should carry one in my opinion. Though I agree yea egos and guns never mix. People need to remember, a firearm can take someone's life so you got to treat them as such.
@AmanOU2be stand your ground does not protect you when you started the confrontation such as approaching someone's car and berating them or making demands. I live in a stand your ground state and you have no idea what you are talking about.
@AmanOU2be btw you ruined you own argument. You are probably right she did not send a text so all he saw was a guy having an altercation with his wife while his child was in the car. Most father's and husbands are going to take an aggressive approach to defending their family.
@Matti O The laws vary from state to state. I live in Ohio. The law here may differ from yours. Also, don't forget which people constitute the parties and who actual escalates the situation. The father is the one who started THAT confrontation.
If you and other people continue to make poor decisions, people will continue to get shot.
@Matti OThe state agreed with you, when? With the conviction? If that is what you are saying, the state agreed with you (after not wanting to press charges in the first place) because he paused before firing and the victim was not advancing DURING that pause. The only reason he was convicted was the CC footage. The only witnesses seen in the footage are all party of the plaintiff's party. It would have been them vs him. Also, since the victim backed away and was shot in the front, that would have been even harder to convince a jury that the victim was not retreating. The trajectory of the projectile tells them that the two men were close.
@AmanOU2be the dude who pushed him immediately deescalated when he stepped back. Michael escalated it. The state agreed with man slaughter because he fired once and it happening be a shot that resulted in his death
@AmanOU2be also did you forget he other guy that was in front of he store that saw what happened? So no even then your claim that it's only the victims family. Btw the plaintiff is the state. You keep using words like Michael does without really knowing what you are talking about.
@AmanOU2be you mean the fact that you are misusing words? That is to show that your knowledge on the subject is lacking. It's less for you are more for others to see that your arguments have less weight because you don't really grasp what you are talking about. Sorry, I did drop a few comments together. Probably should have put them in 1 comment.
@Matti O You can keep correcting me on my word usage and still be wrong, as well. I thought the other guy was a relative. Also, he was moving away and it looks like he was focused on Mike (as he should be). All mike would have to say to the court is he was watching all "threats" and noticed that the man was watching him.
@Matti O No, not really. That is what you THINK. You can know the name of something and that is ALL you know about it.
Do you even remember what you were arguing? lol. The confrontation between the father and Mike is what is important, not the one between the wife and Mike. The father started the confrontation by shoving Mike down. HE started it and Mike responded by drawing his weapon. That should have been the end of the confrontation but we will never know that.
@sinkingship5 man thats cool cause he like that but not all of us thugs just like how all white people arent hateful pieces of shit😌🗒🖌take note. Be blessed
He said he's been carrying for 26 years. I can't imagine how many times he would've gone on his little power trips by revealing his gun to threaten others over minor infractions
To quote the wiki artical of this mane. " He accuses Drejka of threatening to shoot him and using a racial slur. The store owner Salous intervened and ordered Drejka to stop or else he would call the police, to whom Drejka replied, "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After the incident Drejka calls the company the driver works for and complains to the owner John Tyler, reportedly saying the driver was "lucky I didn't blow his head off." The driver reports this incident to the police in July after the shooting of Markeis McGlockton at the same location. " This is a man who thinks he is just in being king shit, and that taking someone's life is proper justification for 'doing the wrong thing'
@Mrbeanzzz idk if i agree with that but still going for kill option instead of threating to shoot or asking them why he got pushed could've worked better. He fucked his own life and other dude's
@Kirsten Bakker Thanks, i thought he said he was 38. Him being 48 makes it even more pathetic in my eyes. Quite a good example that being older doesn't necessarily mean one's wiser
@KOLLUSION Transistor Funk - Topic please explain how you thought he wanted to be a cop? All I see is a man carrying a gun in a bad neighborhood because people will attack you for no reason like this.
@R. M. if you live in the kind of neighborhood you're painting right now, you wouldn't walk up to some random car and look for a sticker. He knew it might become confrontational. He literally said it in the video.
Unless they have a good, solid PC unit, if he starts kiss up to COs he'd get stomped senseless to the point he'd never think about doing it again. If it continued he'd get wet up.
Young bucks now don't give a damn. The order don't need to be given. They smoke people just to watch them bleed.
@R. M. Yeah right? I dont get why everyone is bashing the guy with the gun just because he defended himself. Yes he was looking for a sticker on the car which could lead to trouble but that is no excuse for the dead guy to charge at him. I am not saying the dead guy was at fault but neither was the guy with the gun. The dead guy should have talked it out, the other guy wouldnt have pulled out the gun and every body would have been safe
@R. M. If you're gonna side with the unpopular opinion, you need to know how to posit your arguments better. Usually the popular opinion is the right one. But it's good practice arguing for the wrong side for those rare times when the popular argument is wrong, cause you'll know how to persuade people better.
In this case though, the shooter is clearly some dude who was waiting for an opportunity to shoot someone. I think his hesitation in shooting suggests that he had to think about if it was justified, and it wasn't, but for someone wanting an excuse to use their gun, their mind is gonna justify any little thing.
@R. M. " so this is what you're resulting to?" You meant to say/write, RESORTING to? Anyway, you're a good patriotic American. A tad white racist, but a patriot nonetheless.
@R. M. “Hahaha” indeed. Now, in case by some miracle you outgrow your sophomoric talent for self entertainment I could be actually interested in what you have to say. It’s also called “growing up “. You know, when adults discuss things so that they may learn from each other. Which is quite different from talking to yourself so that you can claim “victory “. Like I said, it’s part of growing up.
Why are people even trying to argue with R.M.? He should have been ignored the second he tried to justify the shooting of an unarmed man walking away from an altercation he didn’t start. He should have been dismissed a second time when he proved to be an actual racist. He should have definitely been dismissed when he proved to be COVID-denier.
I mean come on guys, you aren’t going to convince somebody 3 layers (and probably more) deep in their delusions. How anybody liked any of their comments is beyond me, but there are a lot of awful people.
The fact that he felt he was entitled to walk around her car looking for placards as if he was the police is mind boggling. THEN had the audacity to approach her. His only duty at that point was to call the police.
checking the vehicle and talking to her aren't morally or legally wrong.....it needn't be audacity. If he feels that telling her is better than trying to get her a ticket that is well within his rights. The shove wasn't legal or moral, the draw was perfectly legal, after the shove the man was walking toward him, during the draw, he stopped, started to back away and turn, therefore the SHOT was 100% illegal and not justified.
@75ur15 It was actually the audacity as Drejka parked illegally and wanted to call someone out on their faults. McGlockton's gf was pregnant at the time, it wasn't okay to shove but at least it made sense that he was trying to protect her. We can quit the bs and not pretend as if Drejka wasn't looking for a fight and a justification to fire his gun at someone.
@comp uter based solely on the one instance that conclusion can't be drawn, so no way to know that as the father/husband.....with knowledge of his past i agree with you about him looking for his "chance". Lastly, the shove can't reasonably (imo) be defended as the man is approaching the shooter is more than an arms length from the vehicle, and in his sight she gets out (removing the door as a shield, and the drive away option) and closes the distance by HER choice. can't justify the shove.....that still doesn't make the shot ok. many bad decisions
@75ur15 He did not care if she got a ticket or not. He is not the police so that is the audacity of him approaching her as if he is the police. He wouldn't have approached her if he didn't have a gun. He wouldn't have approached her if she was white. He saw a black woman and thought he could impose his will over her. He felt, as most racist whites do, that he was teaching the black a lesson.
I was hassled in a parking lot before because I didn’t “look handicapped” even though the car I was in had a handicapped placard. I am not handicapped but my mother is and she and my father and aunt were inside the store where we were parked. This person was very aggressive and it’s scary to think how it could have escalated. Also it’s incredibly ignorant for a grown adult to accost someone over “not looking handicapped” when there are many conditions which are not immediately visibly apparent that are eligible for handicapped parking placards.
@Ruby Tuesday outright outlawing all guns is foolish, and it won't curb gun violence completely, or violence in general. criminals will just get craftier if they can't access formerly-legal guns as easy. dangerous explosives are outlawed, yet we still see those being used to hurt people, right? don't want to start political discourse in the comments, but i can promise you as a person in a right to carry state, gun violence isn't as common as you think it is. yes, gun violence is a very troubling issue in the u.s., but not enough to warrant taking away the weapons that give us the right to defend ourselves in case our government gets too corrupt.
@guildpactminish if you have the sign, you have the sign. Don’t even answer them.
1 like
Laura Bow2021-08-02 06:49:36 (edited 2021-08-02 06:54:06 )
I don’t get why anyone tries to make it their business? Who cares if someone parks in a handicap spot, whether you think they’re handicapped or not , who are you to make that judgement, you don’t know them or their situation? I’ve carted around my mother in law without a placard because she’d accidentally leave it in her car, and she was legitimately handicapped. I’ve parked in the handicapped spot at the gas station when I was 9mos pregnant and my feet were so swollen I could feel the water sloshing when I shook my foot. Although I didn’t have a placard nor was I handicapped, I had parked at a gas station that literally had one car parked at the pump. It’s not up to you to play judge, jury and (literally) executioner. I just don’t get why people can’t mind their own business.(By you I don’t mean OP in general, or anyone else on this thread, just adding to the conversation so please don’t think I’m being a jerk😌)
Yeah dude…he fired the gun as his pusher was backing up. The pusher saw the gun, realized he was about to get shot and started backing up, and 2 seconds later (one-hippopotamus-two-hippopotamus) he THEN fired. That’s NOT self defense. He shot him for revenge.
you put it perfectly. this was revenge. being pushed over, even if it was sudden, the victim was not actively attacking him when he took his gun out. literally if my partner & 2 of my kids are in the car and there is a freakin' guy screaming at them, i certainly go into protection mode.
Exactly what I saw, he pushed him and immediately ceased combat, even backing off, and this was initiated by the guy with the gun, he was out of lines the minute he took it into his own hands against a woman. If he had such an issue, his options were call the cops or notify the store manager, anything outside of that became grounds for confrontation.
It's appropriate you show your fire-arm FIRST before making the shot. It's to show the attacker they'll most likely lose everything within a few seconds.
I don't think it was "revenge". I think it was more that he believed the push gave him justification to fire unless the other guy turned and ran away. Backing up a few steps wasn't enough to show that the other guy was disengaging from the fight.
Pulling the gun was enough. If it had ended there I think all parties involved would have been justified in their actions. Confronting a person parked in a handicap spot without placards, not necessary but justified. Shoving the guy screaming at your wife and children not necessary but justified. Pulling a gun on the guy that shoved you to the ground, not necessary but justified. Shooting that man, not necessary and not justified.
@John Glass Killing someone purely because you think it can be justified legally is actually worse than killing someone because you're angry and want revenge- it's calculating and cold-blooded. Also, walking away from someone is pretty much the most basic definition of disengaging from a fight- anyone who got in a fight as a kid will probably have been told 'next time, just walk away'. Given his history of threatening people with his gun in other instances, you might well be right about his motivation, though- he seems overly preoccupied with the idea of shooting someone, and may have been looking for any excuse.
@John Glass Perfect, balanced summation there (without the crock of sh*t some others are spouting on here). Problem with guns is that some use them out of all proportion to the situation; simply showing the pistol would have worked (most probably). Some people tend to go 'Route 1' when armed.
@Gavin H showing the gun actually did work, that guy was backing down according to his body language. I'm sure his words were not so friendly, but words are not enough to justify shooting.
When people are free to posses arms there will be tragedies. When people are not free to posses arms there will be genocides.
@John Glass I agree with that. If he would have shot a second earlier I think he gets off. It looked to me like he was about to get kicked in the face before he pulled the gun.
@Hit Rapper and Artist Dababy I have no idea... No idea at all... 🤦
1 like
Tomáš Černák2021-06-18 01:50:44 (edited 2021-06-18 01:51:53 )
Wrong it was not revenge. It was murder. He waited whole life to some victim gives him "lawful reason". Unfortunately for him, there was a camera, victim reacted perfectly and BLM changed in america a lot. But because his intent was to kill someone in fact anyone, it is clearly 1st degree murder and because of circumstance (killing father in front of family) he should get injection.
@squarecracker WTF, open ur eyes man. Thats not true. He just pushed him away and then he back up. He didnt do anything to let the other guy feeling he should put out his gun. Ur just crazy as this guy.
@John Glass It is not justified shoving somebody like that for merely screaming, at whomever that might be. He lost his life because of that, plain and simple. Don't write stupid things like that making people belive violence is allowed at the cost of verbal onslaught. Children at school would get shoved every each day, and that's just wrong. Not justified.
Michael is a cursed name. My older brother, Michael, would hit me so often as a kid that I can't break my habits related to it in my adult life. For example, I can't leave my bedroom door open without feeling like a threat could be coming through the doorway. Not to complain about minor trauma, but Michael is indeed a very cursed name.
that's my dad's name! thankfully the most cursed things he has ever done were limited to wearing shorts in below-freezing weather (he still does this), and accidentally ripping a door off its hinges once lol
google search "top boys names in the 80s" and guess what name was #1 at that time? So it's no surprise that there are a bunch of youngish and middle-aged men today are named Michael. This is simple statistics and nothing to do with the name itself.
It’s so hit or miss lol like you either get Michael Jordan, Michael Phelps or Michael Myers lol Mike Tyson was pretty much both leaning towards Phelps and Jordan these days
The Name Michael means who is like God or Gift from God although the name doesn't fit or match everyone given the name it isnt the name that is the problem its the bad choices humans make in their lives
Well my name is Karen. I have never asked to speak to the manager and the Karen memes and the behaviour of those people makes me cringe. I don't relate. So yeh we don't choose our names we choose our behaviour.
Not gonna lie, four Mikes in my family and all of the douchebags (alcoholics, child abuser, cheater, wife beater). Then there was the one co-worker named Mike who OD'd and died. And the other co-worker who was a nice enough guy, but almost had a stroke at work due to his severe diabetes...not his fault but damn. It's like a curse. lol
Despite understanding that Micheal is a very common name, I am a bit dubious when I meet a new person with the name. I have Mike PTSD. 😆
@Caleb Money hollis foo acting like he broke his arm. Meanwhile killed a good father. This guy probably a horrible father. Smells like beer and gunpowder I bet
@banjaxeguitars banjaxeguitars 1) he also illegally parked 2) being shoved to the ground once is not “being ground into the pavement” 3) ferociously? really? 4) the father, who was murdered in front of his own kid, was walking away did you even watch the video ?
@Daniel Martin So after reading your comment I thought "oh yeah, that lady that murdered a ton of her former coworkers in Cali" but I couldn't remember her name, so I googled "postal worker shooting" and DAMN. I now know where the phrase going postal comes from...
"I'm pretty sore." What an absolute clown. As a supporter of the second amendment, people like this should never be allowed to own a gun. Him and Jeremy Dewitte would probably be best friends. Shooting an unarmed man cause he pushed you after getting into an argument with someone who was minding their own business. He's a big ol' boy too. Everything about this guy screams academy drop out. The lesson: don't park in a handicapped space without placards or this guy will shoot someone you're with.
@Gutter Bear lowkey i feel like taking away his guns and permit forever and giving him a milder sentence would absolutely wreck him as a person and push him to rethink his actions far more than 20 years
December 21st, 1989 The letters are becoming too much. My position is overrun and I'm buried up to my eyes in packages. Letters to santa are flying over my head. I think Jimmy got taken out by a paper cut. I pray the communique demanding better overtime pay reaches HQ. In the meanwhile, I write to you, dearest Wilma. I know it will not get to you soon, because I have far too many letters to deliver before I can come home. I don't know if I'll even see the next sunset.... As I have to sleep for work the next day.
@RZVT well the man was not innocent he still pushed the dude. I know he's dead but that doesn't mean we have to pretend that he shouldn't have pushed that guy. The dude that shot him Is a piece of shit and should be in prison for a long time but that dude got slammed. That isn't "nothing."
@Swamp hawk, this loser scraped his elbow pulling out that gun! His elbow was hurt and so was his pride/feelings!
In the first part of the interrogation, he uses the scrapped up arm/elbow freely, and then intermittently, throughout the investigation/interrogation. WHAT?!!!
@Chaldean Guy Wasn't really a strawman... Unless it was a joke/sarcasm, Andrew seemed to infer with his 'he could have hit his head and died' statement (nevermind that he was hit from the side so hitting his head in the fall would've be highly unlikely) that he was saying that either both attacks were equal or that the response with the gun was justified.
@Chaldean Guy Now who's employing a strawman here... He said more than that. The second-half of his comment was telling when he said the guy could've been killed. Not only is a death from a push like that unlikely since Drejka was shoved from his side, but that random part of the comment speaks to more that just an "observation"... He wasn't simply stating anything...
@rachybaby72, omg, you really are that dense, eh? Andrew said the guy wasn't innocent, because he attacked first. Whether he died from the fall or not, is irrelevant, as it has nothing to do with the innocence of the man being killed. You're grasping at straws, here.
@Andrew Jackson He literally pulled a gun on 4 different people and 2 of them being women. He was looking to pull it and knowing his past probably would've anyway. He was also lying.
@Niceock man, how am I defending him? I've already stated, he shouldn't have shot him. What I'm arguing is, how the guy that pushed him isn't innocent, either! Those two idiots were pulling straw mans left and right.
@Chaldean Guy He is though. All the dude did was push him because he was harassing his girl. Also, what's the point of even pointing it out unless you're suggesting something?
@Niceock man, you don't touch someone, unless they touch you or touch someone else (if not in self-defense). The whole point Andrew was making was that the guy who pushed him wasn't innocent. That's a fact. Whether he brought up he could've died from the push or not is irrelevant; the guy who pushed him wasn't innocent.
@blazeaglory, I would have gotten in between him and my wife, but not touch him, until he touched me, first. That's the law, something you guys clearly don't understand. Doesn't matter how loud someone's yelling at your wife/child/friend, etc...You don't put your hands on people. Seriously, I stopped thinking like you guys, when I got to high school. He's not innocent; live with it.
@Scoots McGee yeah the average person wouldn't think of that, it was actually cool I learned something BUT that suggests survivalist training to me along with all his other jargon
It had no bearing, we know he got knocked down. Even if he went to the hospital for x-rays it wouldn't have changed a thing. Once the assailant/victim started backing up - it was over.
we all saw him waving his right arm around, right? if your shoulder was that badly injured you would not be able to raise it above your head. Is his arm sore? yeah probably but just take some tylenol and he should be fine
They were probably in one of those areas where a single station services 4-5 of the local towns, response times always suck as a result. It's really a shame.
@Beyond Backwater so because of a random person commenting on YouTube there will forever be division? Lmao. Come on dude you don't even understand sarcasm. Sad.
@Still Sidda How am I pretending to be a victim? I honestly believe cops, hospitals and the like treat minorities different. You don't have to agree. I don't care.
@Wize Wolf don’t argue with people who can’t see, or refuse to things from black peoples perspective. There’s really no point in it because what you’re saying has been proved time and time again but there’s always going to be those people who will argue you to the death because they would hate to accept it. It’s a loss, just focus your energy on keeping yourself safe from it.
I work in the tenth busiest ems system in the us as a paramedic... That's normal for us.
Next unit available all day long.
3 likes
Just Me1822021-07-14 07:00:17 (edited 2021-07-14 07:14:29 )
Must not work for a busy service lol .. it’s a shame how low staffed EMS is these days and people calling for bs reasons ( calls that do not require an ambulance and are not life threatening) is what causes us to not have trucks available for serious calls like that.. been a medic for 8 years and it’s only getting worse.. not to mention PD has to arrive and clear the scene before EMS can even work the patient.. also depends how long it took to call 911 as well.. a lot of factors..
@Still Sidda "even including the excessive racism towards white people" yeah, as a white person, this tipped me off to not take you seriously at all lol. Sorry you're unfamiliar with the ABUNDANCE of research that shows that minorities ARE treated worse within several american institutions than white people - including in Healthcare, the justice system, & in educational institutions. It seems you just want them to shut up about the injustice they face. Sorry people speaking up for themselves hurts your sensibilities so much
It might be a really small town far from dispatch. I live in a town like that and EMS is always 30 minutes or more away whenever we call for an ambulance.
That's part right but if you put in consideration the people who take to much time to stop or move over to the side or stop on the traffic lights to let the emergency vehicle pass
@Beyond Backwater racism is a very real thing that black people have faced since the atlantic slave trade when white people invented race. very weird that you're blaming black people for recognizing that as an issue that affects us. you're actually the reason why this wont get solved, you wont take accountability for perpetuating racism.
That's exactly how my mother died too. Paramedics took 45 minutes, for some strange reason. She was kept alive by my aunt via CPR but you know what can happen when your heart fails for too long aaa..
In argentina if u get shot and call paramedics, they will arrive in 1-5 hours minimum, if u are not that lucky they probably dont arrive, but in EE UU 19 minutes is a lot...
Response time and training are probably the biggest factors in someone living and dying. I’ve overdosed quite a few times. Friends of mine overdosed once and never came back. They say 3 minutes, but I’ve seen someone come back after 8. Couldn’t walk for a while though
My 3 year old nephew had passed out, gone limp and turned blue while out with his parents apartment hunting the other day. It took over 25 minutes for the paramedics to arrive :/
Where I used to live there was a 45 minute response time, that is if there were any ambulances around at all. If there weren't you could expect an hour and a half. Don't even want to think about if something like this happened.
@Blackhand Spectre Looks to me like a man defending his family from a Karen that had too much time with too little to do. He had a right to pull the gun, but he is a coward for making the decision to elevate the situation. You two are cowards as well for condoning this, what he shouldve done is take their plates and have the man reported for assault , but because of his rash decision and bad temper, two families are affected and without male figures.
@sean dent Defending his family from what, impotent whining? Maybe if he'd learned to distinguish between an annoyance and a threat he'd still be alive and his children's last memories of him wouldn't involve being ventilated for trying to be a badass.
I think people that defend Drejka fail to realize that he could have handled this situation so much more reasonably by telling his victim to back off and then pressing charges for assault. Instead he murdered a man who backed off at the sight of his gun. There are solutions other than murder. The dude didn't even have a weapon for crying out loud.
Would you say the outcome would be different if there where stricter laws that maybe made it illegal to carry a concealed fire arm in public? Or maybe even make it harder to get a gun? Or would you say that maybe stricter gun laws all around could have made these incidents alot les frequent?
I think most people who defend him can also empathize over the fact that people make mistakes. When you are suddenly attacked and you get a surge of adrenaline, your vision, your sense of time, judgement, etc. - all can get clouded. The reality of this case is that it was an unfortunate misunderstanding with no intentionos to kill from either party.
@ZebraJess92 People do the same thing with knives, umbrellas, bare hands smashing a head against the pavement. I'm not trying to argue for or against guns, I'm only talking about this criminal case. Sometimes people just need to accept that unfortunate misunderstandings happpen.
@Busky yh then mainly criminals would have guns PERFECT. I live in a country where it's illegal to own guns... Guess what criminals still have guns and ordinary citizens can't protect themselves
@ThisIsMeArnold It literally takes less than a second to pull a trigger, whereas stabbing/beating someone up is an act that takes way longer, maybe even minutes. Dont tell me he would have beat him to death in his "lapse of judgement". From what I`ve seen he just could have not shot. That easy. He maybe pushed him (which wasnt great) but he didnt proceed to attack him, so it definitly wasnt self defence and I understand what you mean when you talk about getting a adrenaline rush, but even if that was the case it doesnt make him not guilty, it doesnt make that round un-shot. It doesnt change anything in my opinion. And you could use the "People make mistakes" argument for any case.
@tomtomtom There's a difference between approaching a person, blasting them in the head, grabbing their wallet, running and being suddenly attacked, shooting a gun in retaliation. Also I think it's safe to assume there was no intention to kill. That is also very significant. The man got a 20 year sentence and this year he was already attacked and wounded in the prison. Some people get shorter sentences for intentional murder of their own kids. In my opinion it isn't fair to paint this man as some evil criminal who deserves to suffer. That's the typical public sentiment around this case.
@ThisIsMeArnold If you dont intend on killing someone, then maybe dont shoot them in the chest? He could have just held him at gunpoint and backed off, but he decided to pull the trigger. I am not throught the whole video yet so I cant say anything about the setencing, but as OP already said there was a solution other shooting that guy, maybe he is made out to be worse than he really is, but he is still the sole reason he is where he is now
Thomas Gerl not to mention the man also took two steps back when the gun was pulled so it’s not like he was going to try to kick him (his words “I thought kicks were coming”) the man saw him yelling at his wife and kids and pushed him, there was no chance the man on the ground would be killed
Yeah because our INJUSTICE system would totally help him track down the scumbag attacker to place the charges. Fists ARE a weapon. It's not murder, it was self defense. The jury is WRONG. This is a win for THUGGERY. It is now acceptable to violently assault somebody, because the victim is no longer allowed to fight back.
You could also like, not circle a car like it's a fucking gazelle n you're hungry, and mind your business about someone taking a parking spot for 5 minutes.
It's not defending him. Fact is if you approach someone with violence you're likely to get violence back. Unfortunately on this occasion the person who had violence brought upon them was a coward with a gun. Lesson to be learned here is learn to have dialogue before pushing/shooting someone.
@Busky laws won't prevent human tragedy my guy. Stricter gun laws means average citizens can't protect themselves. We can't always rely on the police and attacking that right isn't the answer.
Well, the same goes for the desisted guy, He could give some warning first too,, what happened to good old talking and arguing? lol, they are both guilty, two bullies !!!!
@Ocean Man Definitely agree with that. Coming out of the store, I'd definitely give a loud, "hey!" to get the guy's attention away from my wife and engaged with me while I'm still far enough away to assess the situation. However, I'd probably still have gotten shot because I'd also still be moving towards the guy just so we didn't have to yell from 20 feet away. Trouble is, I'm sure Michael trained a fair amount. Probably on his own or with like-minded people (ie not professional security/self-defense experts). In his mind, any altercation WOULD escalate to deadly force, so that's all he trained for. Once he felt he was threatened, he was on autopilot. There was no concept of de-escation or disengagement--it was on a course he had completely predetermined in his mind a hundred times already. Heck, I bet the victim could've turned around and ran and Michael would've shot him in the back saying, "he was going to get a weapon to bash my skull in--I had no other choice to save my life."
@ThisIsMeArnold He clearly had intentions to kill. You DO NOT pull your weapon out unless you intend to use it. Guns are not tools to intimidate people. They are to kill. I'm a responsible gun owner who has been in this situation with a gun on me. I DID NOT pull my weapon out. I did take a punch to the face but managed to get out of there. If they had wrestled me I would have used it. Because if they took it from me I was dead. But it never went that far. And I didn't feel it was life threatening. I'm not in jail right now because I chose to not use my gun when it wasn't called for. He is in jail for being a psychopath.
Also notate he could’ve minded his own business and went on about his business. He wasn’t an officer of the law and had no business approaching anyone but because they were black he felt it was his God given right to correct them.
@Jonathan Rampersad I live in a country with heavily restricted gun use. Yes I can't have an assault rifle. ..and in exchange for that? We've never had a mass shooting. Not one. And 'mistakes' like this don't ducking happen. Perfect trade off ino
The dead thug could have handled this situation better by not VIOLENTLY shoving somebody simply because he didn't like the harmless words that were being said.
I’m licensed to carry concealed weapons in my state, and I’m surprised this wasn’t a second degree murder charge. When you carry a gun you have a responsibility to keep everyone around you safe, and that starts by NOT being an egotistical ass that ordains himself the enforcer of ADA compliance. You choose to put that gun everyday, the people around don’t choose to have a loaded weapon concealed from them feet away, and we need to respect that. It’s a microchasm of determining how someone handles power that they’re given. Do you use it to elevate yourself, or to serve others who don’t have it? If somebody illegally parks in a handicap spot, politely let the STORE know and go on about your day. The best outcome you can get as someone carrying a lethal weapon is to de-escalate a violent situation to the point where nobody gets hurt. He escalated this, maneuvering himself into a verbal altercation that escalated and ending the argument with a pistol like he lives on a pirate ship... tells me he was looking for trouble and found it. He bought himself 20 years of prison food.
@Jonathan Rampersad Same. I wish more honest citizens were armed. This whole situation was caused by two violent men overreacting instead of de-escalating the situation. Using this as if it was the normal way people would react is disingenuous.
@your Girrrl and who decides who gets to keep a gun and who doesn't? We're in really ambiguous territory cause people's character comes into play here. Something that can't be measured with a gauge. That's why we have laws
@your Girrrl literally no one has the right to harm anyone with lethal force, allowing people to own lethal weapons such as a firearm is encouraging shootings, murders homicides (etc.) to happen
@Kei “real victim” implies that the person who died wasn’t actually the victim, and instead the son. Maybe they didn’t mean it and were trying to sound deep or w/e
@Martin Bjalončik it’s called defending your scared girlfriend who’s being yelled at by a random man. Yes he could have solved it without a shove but that in no way justifies being shot
If the father's first response to someone arguing with his girlfriend is to immediately go to physical violence and attack someone, then he would not have been able to teach that kid a great many things worth of value. Uncivilized brutes, on both ends of the gun.
2 likes
Martin Bjalončik2021-06-26 10:12:41 (edited 2021-06-26 12:30:34 )
@Asma Daud Judging by your comment, Asma, I guess there is more that you don't understand, not only my ease. Yes, you are certainly alowed to guess whatever you wish. Just let me comment that your thought/premise is just a moronic prejudice. I do not care about that guy's colour at all. I just hate that kind of violent primitivism.
@Rumchata ratchet ???? You have let anti blackness jump out immediately you didn’t even try to hide it .By defending herself from creep that feels entitled to take the law into his own hands I will be labeled as “ratchet” Like I said these comments are exposing y’all racism. The fact you label someone ratchet bc of emotions running high is disgusting. Bc you will never refer to a white expressing herself as ratchet. Please please before you even respond just comprehend what I said. Why do you people hate us so much ? Why do you think we can’t feel pain, emotions, like any other human being. Why can’t y’all give us the decency to be a human.
@G l i c k "Lovetap" Pushed him to the ground. You do realise if you push someone they can fall wrong and hit their head right? Don't get physical with someone unless they're doing the same.
@G l i c k i know someone that is doing prison because of one of those "lovetap of a push". He was working as a bodyguard, an inebriated person got into his face which made him push the guy back. That guy hit his head and died in the hospital.
@G l i c k Yes because being pushed down makes you vulnerable, and when you're put in a vulnerable position in public out of nowhere your going to take the most efficient route to defending yourself which is a gun. What was he going to do after he pushed him down? Leave him alone?
@Henni Gadient Well he shouldn't have escalated the situation that far when he didn't need to like a bonehead. Nobody deserves to die, but people can be stupid and die from that.
@Tyler Hite He did not appear to be approaching him after he shoved him, even before pulling the gun. Even so, taking the gun out was all that he needed. Shooting was completely unwarented, the guy was clearly triggy happy.
@Henni Gadient He didn't know that he was unarmed, he was pushed to the ground. So it's okay for you to just randomly shove people to the ground? You must have a lot of friends. You are literally not even reading what I'm saying so I'm honestly done with you. If you can't see the hysteria around George Floyd protests influencing people into states of fear, you need to do some research. People are so uninformed ffs. No wonder Biden won.
@Tyler Hite You want some cold hard logic? Here you go: 1. McLaughlin shouldn't have escalated the conflict to a physical level. 2. Drejka shouldn't have fired his gun in light of the fact that McLaughlin was clearly backing away. 3. Floyd was murdered by Chauvin, the act was unequivocally caught on tape and the outrage about it is fully justified. Neither hopeless Chauvin apologetics based on laughably irrelevant circumstances nor fake news outlets denying it altogether won't change that reality.
@Frederik L. Fentanyl Floyd? You completely lost all leverage with me. Try idolizing someone who doesn't put gun barrels to pregnant women's stomachs rips someone off and then plays it off like he's a good guy. Not to mention the criminal record beforehand. Face it, everything you know is a lie. Do research that isn't from front page news if you want the real truth my friend.
@Frederik L. You know where I get my news? Ok Mr.Stalker. idk about you but I just look at the toxicology report and eyewitness accounts. What do you listen to? CNN? Blm rhetoric that is in no way true?
@Tyler Hite There you go proving my point. Chauvin literally choked Floyd to death. Claiming Floyd would have survived being literally choked to death if not for previous intoxication is equivalent to claiming that a victim of a fatal shot to the head would have survived if only the round had been fired from a handgun instead of an assault rifle. It's murder no matter how you try to twist and turn it. This is exactly what I'm talking about, marginal circumstances are either fabricated out of thin air or blown out of proportion by fake news outlets like Fox News, Daily Wire, Infowars and all their even cheaper copycats, but all they can ever hope to achieve are very exhausting and completely unconvincing excuses for what every reasonable person can recognize as obvious crimes.
@Frederik L. Did you not read a word I just said, he was already going to die of fentanyl overdose. Not to mention being on 3 other things, dude literally held up his pregnant wife to try to save his skin. Dude was a degenerate.
0 likes
Frederik L.2021-06-30 15:58:22 (edited 2021-06-30 15:58:51 )
@Tyler Hite Oh I am reading every word you say, but all I see is more hysteria and alternative facts as if the scene wasn't actually caught on tape. I could ask you the same thing, you know? Cause it seems to me like you're very eager to gloss over the fact that Chauvin commited manslaughter "at best" and outright murder at worst.
@Frederik L. Do you not realize when you are high on multiple drugs your heart is beating incredibly hard. And you will freaking out and be uncooperative af around cops because you don't want to get taken in to a police station high af as Floyd was to Chauvin if you watch the whole video.
@Tyler Hite Did you not see Floyd begging for his life, clearly unable to breathe, and Chauvin still not moving an inch. Excuses along the lines of "it's not as bad as it looks", "he could easily have survived" or "he was dead anyway" are a) inaccurate to begin with, and b) irrelevant to the irrefutable crime that was commited by Chauvin.
@Enoch Powell At the end of the day, both of them were in the wrong. The guy should've never pushed the other guy, and likewise, that guy shouldn't have shot him for getting "pushed".
@Enoch Powell ya im sure we should all turn to people like you to determine the proper sentencing, you know people who failed high school and are now someone legal experts.
@Enoch Powell FYI, I am flagging every comment you make. You cam blame me for you being censored. Racism is unAmerican and we will wash you down the drain of history.
Here are other incidents involving this piece of trash: Claim Drejka pointed a gun and followed them. They take down his license plate number and contact authorities. Drejka claims the driver cut him off and says he honked his horn and yelled at them but denies pointing his gun and following them. The driver and passenger decline to press charges. Claim Drejka threatened them with a gun. They report the incident to a Largo police officer, who pulls Drejka over. Drejka claims the driver drove too slowly in a 15-mph school zone and says he honked his horn at them but denies pointing his gun. The officer declines to arrest Drejka since the victims drove off. Claims she was waiting for Drejka to pass while in the center lane waiting to turn. Drejka claims the woman nearly hit him and admits to brake-checking her, causing her to rear-end him. A Florida Highway Patrol trooper accuses Drejka of aggressive driving and cites him for the collision. Claims Drejka confronted him over parking his employer's tanker truck in the handicapped space. He accuses Drejka of threatening to shoot him and using a racial slur. The store owner Salous intervened and ordered Drejka to stop or else he would call the police, to whom Drejka replied, "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After the incident Drejka calls the company the driver works for and complains to the owner John Tyler, reportedly saying the driver was "lucky I didn't blow his head off." The driver reports this incident to the police in July after the shooting of Markeis McGlockton at the same location.
These people are factually violent and over aggresive. Why don't people get this. I'm almost positive all these BLM types have never lived in their neighborhoods before, never forced to go to school with them. They're not human in my opinion. And anyone who puts one down should be awarded for public service.
No Fux ah that’s racist 😬 he wasn’t “jumping” anyone, he shoved someone on the ground 😬 no further action. Calling someone a thug to demonize someone, yikes
Ra HoWa the first amendment protects you from the government ya simpleton. Google is a private company and they can censor whoever they want without disrupting anyone's first amendment rights.
@Enoch Powell "In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." 1) George Orwell never said or wrote this. 2) NiNeTeEn-EiGhTy-FoUr reeeeeeeeee 3) Why would you quote someone who, even if he had written that, so vehemently opposes you and everything you stand for?
@Enoch Powell You obviously haven't read any of his work if you have to ask that. His writing is some of the most anti-conservative writing of his time. Besides which, Orwell is misattributed those words, from a book published in 1982 -- 30 years after his death. He never said or wrote anything of the sort in his lifetime. Nobody knows who said that, but the fact that I guessed -- without Googling -- that you were implicitly referencing 1984 & alluding to Orwellianism, should speak volumes as to the veracity of anything you have to say... specifically the lack thereof.
@Enoch Powell no. The minute he pulled out his gun he neutralized any perceived threat. Not only was this asshole wrong, he was behaving in a threatening way toward a female!
I think so, too.. considering the 4 past incidents invoving him with his gun (without firing it). Now this time, he seemed to have the chance to fire it.
@Enoch Powell the guy also parked illegaly next to her. He shot someone because he was pushed. He was no in any imediate danger. He was looking for trouble. He confronts people infront of stores for a disabled parking spot when he didnt need it. He instigisted the confrontation. He paused and thought before pulling the trigger while the man was backing away.
This guy wasn't going out looking for someone to murder, but he WAS living the gun owner's dream. This is exactly why these people want guns, and exactly the excuse they want to use them. "They came at me" is all the justification they need to end a life and prove what a dominant alpha they are. Don't give this guy a gun and this situation wouldn't have escalated past him being on the floor. Hell, he would be the victim of assault. But as soon as you give someone the "easy option", they will take it, and they will flaunt it, and society crumbles.
Someone died defending his family from a wacko who thought life was gta. I’m glad justice was served in he end, i hope the victim’s family eventually recovers.
I wouldn't say the guy "defended his family" he definitely assaulted the guy for no reason. The subject of this video was undoubtedly guilty of murder and was wrong for even drawing his weapon, but if he hadn't the father would have recieved assault charges, and for good reason.
@patrick kinnear I'm not American, but where I'm from what the father did wouldn't even count as a proper crime, it would be a tort. If the same thing happened here and Michael hadn't acted like a complete psycho, he could have probably sued, but the father wouldn't have gotten prison time, just would have had to pay some money.
honestly the whole situation is insane and nobody is in the right imo 1. family parks in disabled spot 2. weirdo who thinks his life revolves around defending his local gas station confronts the mother 3. argument ensues instead of the mother avoiding confrontation by something as simple as "sorry, I will move the car" 4. father comes out and his first reaction to a verbal argument is to get physical 5. weirdo finally gets to shoot his gun after waiting for so long to use it
@Squiggly Line 1. No Don't be a pos 2. If someone is idling in a parking spot leave them alone 3. Ignore the wannabe cop they have no authority and they want attention 4. There's no reason to fight anyway. Don't push anyone Don't shoot anyone and everyone gets home safe
@Mark Muir he got shot in the chest and then ran into the store for help where he collapsed and died… white fit was scared that a black guy was going to beat him up that’s all it was and pulled out his gun … he needed that hun cuhz he never won a fist fight a day in his life
It's as esy as to buy guns in ur Country compared to gta. That's so unreal I can't imagine. Here in Germany we don't sell guns to any idiots who don't live in reality. And guess what, spoiler alert we don't have shootings here by us. (compared to America)
@John Doe defending them from a verbal confrontation by sprinting at and pushing a guy over? That was not „defending“. Not saying that the shooter was right though
Honestly the part that ticked me off was that after he had a month to think about it, he said he wouldn’t have done anything differently. I can understand making an irrational split second decision, but there truly was no need to fire, & the man he killed had a wife and kids. He should’ve regretted what he’d done at the very least
the only time he shows any regret or remorse is when the interviewer asks him about his dogs. not the fact that he took a husband and a father away from their family over a stupid parking space.
@christian No one should get killed over a parking space BUT let's put this in perspective: The guy wasn't shot and killed over a parking space, he was shot and killed because he turned a verbal altercation into a physical one. Let's also not forget: He wouldn't have been killed if his wife had respected the parking laws He wouldn't have been killed if his wife had said "sorry, I didn't realize it was a handicapped spot" and moved her vehicle He wouldn't have been killed if he didn't go hands on to Drejka
Yes, Drejka should have pulled his weapon and backed the guy off, NOT fired, but don't dismiss all the events leading up to that.
It wasn’t his Wife. They were not married. Most likely being on Welfare and Food Stamps is why they weren’t married. They didn’t have the same last name.
@Muskoka Mike ok MikeCORRECT, if we were in a perfect world and everyone made the right choices!!! However, in the scheme of living life this shouldn’t have happened over a parking space!!!
@Nikia White See, these situations give fuel to the anti gun nuts saying "see this is what happens when you allow someone to arm themselves".
BTW: this didn't happen over a parking space, this happened because the man turned a verbal altercation into a physical one.
I wouldn't even say "in a perfect world", I'd say even in the most basic civilized world. There's a theory called "the shopping cart theory" and the basis is "if you were raised right, you return the shopping cart to the corral" and they continue from that extrapolating on how "civilized" a society is.
The kicker is: there are actually people who argue that they are RIGHT in not returning the shopping cart.
Now using that in this scenario: the woman shouldn't have parked in the handicapped spot. When she was called out for it, she should have said "sorry, ok, I'll move" but in today's UNcivilized society, women are taught to be "bad bitc&es" and of COURSE she wouldn't react properly and admit her error, HOW DARE A SOMEONE CALL HER OUT? "oh no you dinnit"!!!
@christian Micheal Dunn the other shooter at a convenience store killing a teen cried on the stand when they mentioned his DOG. I love dogs with all my heart but it didn't make him look empathetic he looked like a selfish jerk not one tear over the teen he murdered.
@Muskoka Mike no the preceding events aren't brought up because doing so lays equal blame on the victim when thats just not the case.
The murder instigated the conflict by turning a minor event of someone parking illegally into screaming for several minutes. Lets also not forgot all his actions leading upto the event.
He was stepping outside of his authority social obligation, and had had this kind of conflict several times before. Even after being told to stop by the owners of the gas station. This shows a patern of agressive behavior reinforced by the 4 other times he pulled a gun on others in that month alone.
The extent of the victims blame is a minor infraction and the single battery of pushing the man. The extent of the murders blame is a history of starting arguments over something that is not his business, and he was prohibited from doing. Having a history of agressive action culminating in reacting to being pushed by pulling a gun, and shooting a retreating man after having seconds to see he was no longer in danger.
Nothing but him is the reason why people are anti gun. People like him get guns and look for a reason to use them. In this case policing something not in his right, escalating every argument caused by his behavior, and shooting someone not on rushed reaction but because he wanted to. That murder deserved everything he got and is getting.
@Muskoka Mike your second comment about the shopping cart theory is almost irrelevant as it just adresses a form of social contract. In no way does it justify stepping outside of a reasonable social escalation, and breaking the social contract yourself by screaming at someone. Nor does it justify you shooting someone if they push you to get you away from them for screaming at them about the cart.
@Shadow nice rant, but who said it did? (justify shooting someone for not returning the cart).
Here's how escalation works: Person A doesn't return their cart Person B says Hey return that cart (rightfully) Person A says F you Person B says OH yeah? (rightfully) Person A pushes person B Person B defends himself (rightfully)
The whole situation could have been avoided if Person A was raised correctly. If Person A was taught from an early age, when you get called out for your misdeeds, there's punishment, they would learn. Instead? They react with aggression "don't tell me what to do". Hence why the prison population is so large in the US.
@Muskoka Mike ah yes thats escilation with a normal person. This was more like Person A: Doesn't return cart Person B: Tells them to put the cart back, or overblows the situation and is rude in their suggestion Person A: (rightfully,) Indignant at person Bs rudeness"f off." Person B: indignant (debatable,) begins yelling at person A and acting in an aggressive manner Person A: pushes person B
In order for your idea to make sense person B has to have been raised well themselves and engage withing the confines of social contract. Thus in step 4 they cannot break the social contract. He could have done this by threats of legal punishment, insults of his own, etc. He instead yelled and acted aggressively, he as person B cannot do so he has to keep within social convention. If not then Person B has no moral ground to stand on, as they are committing the same action of violating the social contract and decency. The murderer did not act within the social contract. He stepped beyond this responsibilities, and ignored direction from those with the authority he did not. He was raised just as if not more poorly to escalate the situation further then normal, and kill someone over something that was not his place and was actively made not his place.
He had no right to do any more then the social contract allows. This line of logic stopped applying to this situation as soon as he started yelling. In the absence of physical altercation the theories logical end point is to step away and call those who can rightfully handle the situation. Whether that may be a manager who can ban person A or the police who can punish the person ignoring the parking laws.
This of course does not bring in the other evidence of ill rearing. Those being escalating conflict by threatening death at inappropriate times on at least 4 other occasions.
@Muskoka Mike It should also be noted that Michael himself was parked illegally. If Person A doesn't return their cart and Person B tells them to return it (while also not returning their own cart). Person A now has every right to be indignant. Person B, however, does not have the right to escalate the situation by being aggressive and yelling when they themselves are being hypocritical. While Person C should not have pushed Person B, they did it to protect Person A. Person B should not have shot Person C in response to a push and assumed they would continue the altercation.
All in all, a man died over a woman parking in a handicapped spot. Maybe she shouldn't have parked there, but it was not her fault that her boyfriend decided to push Michael, and it certainly wasn't her fault Michael shot her boyfriend. Michael could have reported her instead of getting involved directly, especially since it didn't directly affect him.
@Muskoka Mike literally not the point. We aren't discussing of the confrontation was justified, or if he shouldve parked in the parking space in the first place, or the fact that the gun was even justifiably pulled out. You can argue all those things but that's not what this case is trying to prove at all. It was asking whether or not the use of deadly force was justified. Maybe if the man who was shot was still alive, all of these things would have been discussed, but the fact that he died? It voids all of it.
@Muskoka Mike OK but hear me out, our person B here fucking murdered person A. Sure, none of this would have happened if person B never did something wrong, but person B also wasn't aware of the whole situation. Person B just saw someone berating his wife and children, and (in my opinion rightfully) shoved him off. Had person B known the full story, maybe it would have turned out a bit differently, after all, it's not as if person B was aware the his wife was being rude to person A, and most likely did not know that he parked in a handicap spot. A little push ain't going to kill anyone, and person B was already backing up after the fact, untill person A turned the situation from a relatively small altercation about a parking spot, to a full blown man slaughter case. There was no reason for person A to believe that he was even gonna be hurt at that point, maybe if he tried to explain himself to the man and why he was upset, things would have went smoothly. But no, he just took his gun out and shot a man who was already backing up in the first place. And you say that person B escalated? Person A both instigated the altercation, and escalated it to heights I don't think person B really thought it was ever gonna go.
0 likes
The Durk2022-02-01 17:54:31 (edited 2022-02-01 17:56:55 )
That was a roller coaster to watch, thank christ this guy got what he deserved !!
Watching that defence attorney was like watching a child attempt to convince a bunch of other children that someone didn't steal all the cookies from the cookie jar.... if I were part of the jury involved in this case I would feel as though he was insulting my intelligence with the way he speaks, did he really believe those arguments stood any fucking chance?
Same. I’m just sitting here like how can the defense attorney actually take himself seriously by trying to defend Michael. I mean it’s clear as day that Michael didn’t care about shooting someone because it’s clear that the guy he shot was walking away and therefore clearly not a threat. A normal person’s reaction to getting shoved like he did would have been to say like what the hell or whatnot not to grab a gun and shoot the person.
He probably didn’t think any of it would work. Someone has to take these dumb cases in order for them to stand trial. An attorney is required to give their best to a case or else they face losing their ability to practice. Seeing how incriminating the case was, I can see why his best was so awful.
Thank god for video cameras. It makes me sick to think of all the horrible injustices that have occurred in the past due to there not being video evidence to expose the lies of people like drejka.
Someone died all because this guy was mad about a parking spot and got a boo-boo on his elbow. His head is warped. I can only imagine how the family of the victim must feel. That has to be one of the hardest things to see. :(
Can't imagine anything much worse. Just watch out for the defenders of this guy, they like to stalk the comment section spilling their nonsense of why the dead guy had it coming.
For me, I would rather get beat up and live than not get beat up but kill a father in front of his child.
@vocal procrastinating 100% this. people can try to tell us that it wasn’t, but it is. And im willing to bet, that if it was a white woman who had parked in the handicapped spot, he would’ve either just ignore her or kindly ask her to move from the parking spot.
I saw this in a CCW class once. The instructor asked the class if he/she would rule this as justified. The instructor left the answer open ended in order to encourage discussion. But ultimately, the instructor said that regardless of the verdict, the shooter's behavior leading up to the shooting was unacceptable. The shooter was way too aggressive, irascible, and unobservant (he just let the other guy blindside him with the shove). I wouldn't rule this as a justified shooting, but then again, I'm not a jury of 12 people from a different state.
I carry too, but you have to understand what an imminent threat is. I understand he's annoyed that someone who isn't handicapped is taking up the space. That said, there weren't any other cars, that I could see, and the man was in and out quickly. He had an aggressive reaction over a relatively minor issue. Being pushed is not an immediate threat of serious injury or death. I've been trained with firearms since I was a kid, I'm 46 now. Thankfully I've never had to pull my weapon. In my opinion this guy wasn't properly trained. Don't carry if you have anger issues. He didn't need to draw. Usually if someone sees your weapon they will walk away. This is a speculative opinion, but I think this guy was looking for a fight. If the victim had begun kicking, beating, or stomping him, this would be an entirely different situation. Unfortunately, he's an angry person, with a lower than average intelligence. His goal was to become police or military, but couldn't hack it. He tries, and fails, to use military and police terms. It's pathetic. and he took it out on someone defending his wife. The shooter knows he made a mistake, that had deadly consequences. He immediately begins to spin a narrative, giving too much irrelevant information. His body language, sentence structure, pronouns, and he's being overly polite are all indications of deception. He killed the victim in cold blood. The detectives are on him from the jump.
Being pushed could absolutely lead to death if the person lands on their head wrong. There was literally a case of a landlord who died this exact way when his tenant pushed him, happened this past week I believe. Drejka was found guilty due to his comments he made to the police and because he shot the victim that was clearly stopping his attack and backing away when he saw the gun. If the guy had continued to try and assault Drejka, the sentencing outcome could have been very different. But if you go around pushing people while YOU'RE the aggressor, they have every right to self defense.
Yeah the issue is that NO ONE has to be trained correctly to have the weapon. So people like him are all over just waiting for a chance to use their courage enhancer
Victoria Pitts2022-06-04 07:50:45 (edited 2022-06-04 07:51:11 )
@Kira the case you’re talking about is not comparable because that man was pushed off the edge of a staircase, hit his head and died. Drejka was on level ground and the worst “injury” he could claim from that altercation was a little boo boo on his arm.
The way he acted about his little injury was so funny, I mean come on! insisting on greeting with his left hand, buttoning up the shirt into a sling... and then he completely forgot whenever he was asked to act out what happened.
If he was a better actor I bet he would be the type of guy who got himself in accidents and then sued for made up injuries
Yeah it was funny when all of a sudden his shirts in a damn sling lol he acted like he got tackled the dude literally just gave him a good push he wasn’t running at any point lol dudes a wimpy clown
"The defendant is guilty because he is a good shot" might be the dumbest legal argument I've ever heard (not commenting on the overall justifiability or verdict in this case).
Had he not pull the gun, he'd get his head stomped in the next second for sure. Judging by the moral character of the dead guy who escalates, at that point, a purely verbal confrontation to physical. His mistake was panicking and firing, since from the cctv footage it seems like the dead guy reacted wisely at having a piece pointed at him and maybe was even about to retreat.
I love how the cops were playing dumb on everything I love how they stayed they didn’t know what a force multiplayer was you know damn well they did also you know damn well if a cop got shoved like that they would of fired too that’s what pisses me off about this whole situation and the fact that If he would of said he feared for his life he probably wouldn’t be in prison. The guy just got shoved to the ground violently and they expect him to know exact distances and time elapsed between him pulling the gun and firing in high stress situation no body counts that it’s not like he’s at the range with his beeper lol . He definitely should of said he wanted a lawyer before he said anything even if it pisses them off or makes you look guilty cops can be very dirty and lie in there interrogations always always ask for a lawyer
Usually when a cop gets shoved or pushed or whatever, they are dealing with a criminal.
But no matter how he reacted, there were no words interchanged between the two men. Plus, he never charged him. The guy took three steps back once he saw the gun. In a situation like that, three seconds is an eternity. Watching the video, that gun followed that man.
This guy just really thinks he was in the right, huh? Honestly, that’s what I think is the difference between someone like this guy and someone like Michael Dunn. Michael started the fight with the intent to shoot someone, the fact that he followed them and kept shooting and then his fleeing the scene shows that. He knew he was in the wrong, but he did it anyway. This guy thought he was fully in the right, he frames it like he was nobly correcting an injustice, I don’t even think he meant to kill the guy with his 1 shot. But that’s what makes it worse, I don’t think he feels bad or even recognizes that he did a bad thing. He just coldly brushed past it, and doesn’t care that someone died. He feels entirely justified and that someone died from his actions is just a side effect. It’s so gross thinking about it. It’s almost worse than the alternative to me.
I like how the investigators even ask politely.. Like can I call you Michael? Here in India if they knew who the culprit was he would have been trashed black and blue without even flinching for a second. I've seen so many cases on here. They really take it slow to gather all the possible evidences. They listen to their side while they already have their own proofs and know everything about it. In India it's over even before it starts.
Defense Lawyer: "He's not happy. He's not celebrating." Oh, thank God he's not clicking his heels together and popping champagne bottles. He has 0.00000008% of humanity in him.
Talk about a plethora of bad decisions. You have an entire parking lot of empty spaces yet you choose to park in the one space designated for handicap/van accessible patrons. Barney Fife pulls up with a hard-on for parking violations, and probably minorities, and starts a confrontation. Alpha male comes out of the store and without have any info at all he shoves Barney Fife to the ground forcibly. Barney pulls a weapon and fires against Alpha Male who probably regretted escalating the confrontation physically once he saw the gun and decides to slowly backpedal like he’s confronted a bear. Fife, sensing he is losing his chance to shoot an unarmed black man, let’s lose a shot. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything as senseless as this.
If you can’t use your hands or know how to avoid / diffuse a confrontation, and carry a weapon for self defense you should get some situational awareness and social skills under your belt.
it's crazy how quick he went for the gun, at no point did the victim show he had any weapon he just pushed him to the ground, it could of just been a fist fight but no he went straight for the kill, that to me is 1st degree murder, he had multiple options instead of pulling the trigger, he could of let it go and went about his day, he could of started a fight or called the police to report assault but nope he went with kill first ask questions later
Something I literally just thought of because of this case. How effective do you think it would be to require a verbal "gun owner's oath" upon receiving a concealed carry permit? Or, perhaps, upon the purchase of any firearm? Verbal self affirmations are an effective tool for overcoming trauma, achieving goals, affecting your mood, and much more. You're much more likely to perform a task better if you say outloud to yourself "okay, I got this...". What if we required gun owner's to verbally speak a well-written and easily understandable oath? I'm no wordsmith, but something like:
"This firearm is not a reason to start fights. It is not a tool for winning arguments. It is a responsibility. It is a last resort. I swear to do my best to avoid confrontations and de-escalate situations before considering drawing a firearm."
Do I sound like an absolute fool for thinking this oath might've helped avoid this situation? I mean, you're a gunowner now, you took an oath. You're going to think of that when a confrontation arises. You're going to think of it when you notice you're mouthing off, and probably start to de-escalate. Idk, anyone have thoughts?
I don't think it will really help much ( I am 90% sure I am wrong so any gun owners out there feel free to correct me) since to me gun owners are one of 2 types. You got responsible gun owners, who resort to using guns as a last effort to save yourself and then you have nut-jobs like ol' Mike did there. So you got people who don't need to take an oath since they are already responsible and you got people who would probably just say the oath and forget it the next day. But it's still possible introducing some kind of oath could help with these cases even if just a little bit. Just my thoughts.
It took a life to get this maniac that thought was an authority off the streets. He liked getting into confrontations and it got one killed and him in jail for life. How dumb can someone be.
Wanna know the worst part. This guy would have been a self described "responsible gun owner" before this incident. I wonder how many more "responsible gun owners" there are out there that are just like this guy. Living their lives every day hoping for the day they get to use their gun.
I have a question for any people watching this in the US...... is the threat of violence so bad that people just carry guns in their car? Driving seems to be a situation where easy access to a weapon may be asking for trouble. (Road rage is a problem in UK, I can only imagine what would happen if some of the muppets here had access to firearms) I apologise in advance for my ignorance 🙃
It depends on where you live. There are cities in the US that have big problems with crime, gang violence or poverty (to name a few factors) that contributes to high homicide rates compared to the rest of the country, and people living in those cities might opt to carry a firearm as a means of self defense.
In other places, people might still carry because even though homicides are lower where they live, they'd still rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it just in case. Some might say that speaks to paranoia on their part, but I personally don't see it that way for the majority of gun owners. There's also the belief that if more people are armed (and responsible with the use of their guns) then would-be criminals would think twice about committing crimes because they don't want to find themselves in a situation where they don't know who's armed and who isn't.
I mean, if you wanna defend yourself, you kind of should think of shooting the leg or arm, as that is the least likely hood of killing someone, I have often thought that people think after they have shot, so they generally have no idea what they have done before they have done it....
Speaking of, I can see how it is a difficult scenario, you are under distress and you act by instinct, so... with that in mind, anything could really happen, this person could've accidentally gone with a headshot as well, you never really know
he knew EXACTLY what he was doing. This man is the definition of a self righteous asshole. That man did not diserve to die. he wanted to protect his children. It infuriates me this man didn’t get life
0 likes
Lady Pantha2022-01-25 04:50:18 (edited 2022-01-25 04:51:48 )
Aubrey’s killer admitted he never heard him say a word. He was still chased down, defenseless, and murdered. Marquis came out of a store to defend the mother of his children from a self righteous lunatic. He too never said an utterance, was defenseless and slain. Both deaths hold the same thought process and energy. Fear and delusion is what was standing behind those triggers. One was coming the other was going. This dunce even admitted he never has been in a fight. Yet, he’s willing to assert that he has a full fledge understanding of how this escalated situation should have worked. He’s where he needs to be so he can think about all the times he wanted to be in charge because he had no real power in his weak small little world.
I don't really feel these two cases are that similar... Arbery did nothing wrong aside from trespassing, and even then he did nothing but look around and leave without causing any damage. The guy in this video pushed someone from behind and won a Darwin Award, both men in this case were in the wrong in my opinion.
Today. I have learned I will NEVER become a lawyer. I would say “yes, he is guilty. He thinks because he has a gun he can confront people no matter what”. I would loss my job so fast.
In the footage you can see a guy in the blue/purple shirt standing in front of the store, where he immediately got away when Michael pulled out his firearm. Good quick thinking!
Maybe he thinks it’s the Wild West and it’s his job to protect disabled parking spaces. There’s an old saying I think it’s biblical .It’s better to grab hold of a vicious dog by the ears than to get involved in an argument that doesn’t concern you.. He’s ended up doing twenty years and got battered in prison for sticking his nose in ,as well as causing a terrible loss to a loving family ..
1 like
No Name2022-02-01 18:08:30 (edited 2022-02-01 18:14:14 )
He feigns the arm injury as soon as the detectives enter the room. Then forgets all about it 10 minutes into the interview.
this "man" could harass a female by herself for a minor traffic violation, but could not take a beat down once he's approached. Weak-minded individual.
Leaves home armed with a lethal weapon, provokes violence by threatening unarmed mother, gets pushed over a little bit, fires to kill on a person retreating. "Manslaughter"
16:30 Police: "Was the car running?" Drejka: "I couldn't tell, maybe? It's so quiet. These damn cars, doesn't sound anything like mine."
God, as if I needed another reason to hate this guy; on top of being an entitled murderous racist, he's also one of those shitheads that feels emasculated unless he drives a loud car.
defense lawyer gave me super creepy vibes, he sounds so slimy whereas the prosecution lawyer was awesome! so glad this guy went to jail what an asshole.
You know, you don't have to implicate yourself. Better yet don't do the crime. Second best thing; i want an attorney. Sit in county jail until you are free, i mean if you didn't do it. That's not your burden of proof to prove. These are almost cringeworthy to me lol
Micheal did make 2 steps towards Drejka after pushing him, implying he's not done yet. He did not try to warn Drejka about the use of force but cheapshotted him basically. Up to that point, there is 0 awareness of any threat or premeditation, as Drejka will only then for the 1st time see his attacker after Micheal is already making those 2 steps forward.
The outcome of this case should have set an example in public that no form of aggression Is allowed.
Did Drejka have to shoot, no! Could he have shot in the air.. yes, i think it would have desired effect.
Was he surprised and scared, no doubt.
In my eyes, he's guilty for taking mans life, and him carrying a gun around well thats america.. him playing a role of some local protector warning about wrong parking could be easily seen as a positive thing in different circumstances.
Drejka was attacked from behind and Michael kept walking towards him. You've heard many times, do not pull a gun if you have no intent to shoot. From the moment he went for the gun to shooting it took 2.5 sec, are those 2.5 sec enough for anyone to change thier mind in situation like this... im not so convinced. I'd shoot in the air.. i think... its hard to imagine as im not carrying a gun walking the streets of america.
It's almost like the sheriffs were leading him to give the "right" answers after he confirms over and over that it didn't go how they are suggesting. Not a great interview imo
1 like
Jackson 832022-01-25 04:51:02 (edited 2022-01-25 04:52:00 )
Did drejka know that the shooting was actually recorded? Because his attempt to justify his actions based on the claim that Markeis was 'taking steps towards him' after he drew his gun is blatantly false, and he would surely have known that you would think? Thank god for video cameras, because if this event was not recorded, drejka would still be out there with his beloved gun looking to start more confrontations.
It’s so sad because something as petty as this could have never happened if so many things didn’t go wrong. It’s a butterfly effect that could’ve been solved at any point. The lady could’ve apologized for her wrongdoing and moved the car, fixed. The shooter could have not started arguing, fixed. The husband could have not pushed him down immediately, fixed. This doesn’t justify anything the shooter did, but it just seems crazy to me that something this insignificant led to something like this.
Mind ya business, old man. IMO he had no damn business telling that young lady whatever he told her now a young black man is gone because this old man stuck his nose in someone's shit...lose/lose
Maybe when he gets out he will mind his on business and quit trying to police people. That's what the police get paid to do don't confront call the police
most of the problems in the USA comes from letting normal people have deadly guns, if guns were illegal or just harder to get they could have prevented useless loss of life
Fight or flight makes people stupid. It is multiplicative with people who are already stupid. These people can carry firearms.
Not saying that concealed carry is inherently bad or anything. My brother's one of the most level headed people I know and he conceal carries. but in this case, with someone this stupid, he had no business carrying a gun.
Ugh he's so sickening. He wants to be a police officer so bad. You can tell he's the type that says "I couldn't be in the military because if the drill Sargeant got in my face, I'd beat the shit out of them".
3 things here .. 1 they did park in a handicap spot for no reason ... 2 he was trying to play cop and decides to confront her ... 3 he panics because he is a bitch and pulls his weapon ... dude BACKS AWAY and he still fires ..... that is murder
I live in Belgium, here it takes 5to10min for an ambulance to get to a scene. I understand usa is a big country. But 90min? I don´t understand this. How can it take that long? Is that normal for america?
god is anyone else cringing at the way the defence is speaking in his closing statement or whatever. it feels so condescending. like im a three year old and someone's overprotective mom is telling me how its actually my fault they threw sand in my eyes
This is so sad. The fact that this father collapsed in front of his son and died before he could raise his children and live out his life hurts my soul. Obviously he shouldn’t have pushed the man down like that but the man could have just pressed charges for battery yet he chose cold blooded murder of a father. I’m so glad police came back to this case and did the right thing.
If you do not want things to get violent, don't get violent. The psycho exited a building and immediately engaged in violence. Up to that point it was a non violent situation.
@J Money He used his gun because he misunderstood the law and he thought he was good to go to use whatever force necessary to end what he considered a legitimate threat. Like street justice is somehow US law. And shit like you just said is probably why buddy was actually scared for his life and used the gun. His father probably said those exact words to him just like you're probably gonna say to your own kids and your and my father said to us. So you're perpetuating the same nonsense that precipitated this incident in the first place. On the other side, you and I both know people that are okay with what Drejka did even in light of the retreat once the piece came out. Setting what is actually legal aside, they would say he got what was coming to him for attacking someone unprovoked like that. How about we find a middle ground here where we can acknowledge that it's: 1. not cool to physically attack someone just because they said something to your woman you didn't like, and 2. also beyond insane to think you get to shoot someone for pushing you to the ground. There's no good guy here. Drejka should have been minding his own business, yes. Still dude shouldn't have run up and pushed him to the ground over words. Ultimately, Drejka was way out of line pulling the trigger and he's legit a murderer, but if any one person in this scenario had actually had a cool head and actually behaved civilly, everybody goes home intact and no babies lose their fathers, right in front of their own innocent eyes. I just cannot imagine the damage this did to those children. I give nobody a free pass when it comes to how it effects their kids.
@FullMetal_ They both thought they were above the law. The family thought they could illegally park and physically attack people with no consequences and the gun dude thought he could murder people free of charge. Lesson learned.
@Jonathan Walker He was acting aggressively towards the woman & 3 children. You don't approach a car like that & confront the occupants, that's how pretty much every road rage incident starts out. The victim had no way of knowing his killers intentions towards his woman & 3 kids, you can't fault a man for getting a bit too aggressive when they feel their family might be in danger. The bottom line is the shooter is 100% in the wrong, you don't initiate confrontations like that when you are concealed carrying a firearm, that's the first thing you are taught in CC class. This entire thing could have been avoided by the shooter simply minding his own business & not getting involved which is EXACTLY what he should have done when carrying concealed, this is 100% the fault of the shooter.
Well they also train you (at least I was) when you have a firearm on you NEVER put yourself in a bad spot. I.E. yelling at a lady about a parking spot. Keep to yourself and drive on.
@Frederik Brandt 💯 this. Moral of the story for all parties: don't break the law. This tragedy could have been prevented if a) the family hadn't taken up a handicap spot, b) the father hadn't physically assaulted the guy (could've just said "leave my family alone" and gotten in his car to drive away), and/or c) the dude hadn't responded to a shove with deadly force. This is what happens when people let their egos cloud their judgment 😑
Y’all will really perform useless mental gymnastics to defend murder, especially if a black person is the victim. Even when there’s an entire video dissecting why it was wrong. I can’t bro-
@:Whatarehumans:3 I may be misreading things, but I think the majority of people here are in agreement that violence is not the answer when it comes to solving problems. Out of the two, the shooter was by far the most violent and was punished for it (though not severely enough imo). I'm sure there are a couple of exceptions, but I don't think most people see what the shooter did as OK.
@Linkreincarnation92 I don’t get why you’re telling me this, since my comment is aimed at specific people. Obviously the people that actually don’t think that murdering that father was right are not the ones that I’m addressing.
@:Whatarehumans:3 ah I gotcha. Wasn't sure who you meant by y'all cuz the original comment and most of these replies seem to agree with you. But yeah there are always those few people who just don't get it 😑
@Frofro frofro yes, that man should never have pushed the other man down. It was aggressive, scary, and certainly uncalled for however, the point is that taking a life is going so much further. The guy who got pushed had every right to brandish his firearm but when he did, the black guy was turning away and stepping back. The fight was over. That’s how it should have ended yet the white guy decided to shoot when the threat was no longer present. That’s what we in the western world call murder and it is highly immoral and illegal. You don’t get to take someone’s life just bc they pushed you. If the man was still attacking him, then it would be justified but that’s not what happened here.
@Cody Parin one how is he a “psycho” man was yelling at his partner with kids in the car like that’s an okay thing to do. yes maybe he wasn’t able to see the kids but to yell at someone for just parking there while they went in quickly should’ve not been that big of an issue you have to yell at someone because people do it all the time. he was concerned for his parter and i would have tried to stop someone from yelling at my partner too. secondly he wasn’t even ruining out of the store he seen waht was going on and tried to stope because how could he see the situation from inside the store. in the video you can see him try to move AWAY from the guy when he seen the gun but he yet shot him. so you tell me how he’s a “psycho”
@Jonathan Walker just because someone pushes you don’t mean you shoot. think about it kids fight in school and they fight back when have you ever seen someone pull out a gun and shoot at someone for being pushed.
@bongobruh how is shooting someone okay? i was raid to use equal force not to shoot there’s a difference. he was unarmed and had no clue of the situation but seen him yelling at his wife and kids in the car.
You mean "obviously he shouldn't have assaulted someone." It's sad that people can't seem to think clearly when looking at this video. The demonstrated action is violence on the part of the man who was shot. Him taking a step back and turning doesn't indicate retreating, he could easily be pulling a weapon.
Michael here shouldn't have shot, but the idea that the slightest backward motion indicates retreat is absurd.
@Grimm Reaper Moving backwards isn't retreating. It could be a lot of things. Retreating would be running the fuck away, not simply turning and taking a slow step away.
Do that when a cop orders you to freeze and see if you're shot or not. You most probably will be, because the officer might think you're trying to remove a concealed weapon, etc.
Lately it seems that so many people are angry so we must do the right thing. I hate knowing that people are just walking around with loaded weapons. That man had other choices.
@Michal Sextion I think verbally reprimanding someone for illegally parking their car is a lot less severe than pushing somebody to the ground from behind.
@Michal Sextion pushed you to the ground than stood above you? Yeah he deserved it I would have done the same. That’s why I live in Florida I wish someone would try to do this to me
so what? Who tf told him he could park there? he didn't look disabled, his wife didn't look disabled, the kid didn't look disabled, ALL OF THEM WERE PERFECTLY OK AND HEALTHY ENOUGH TO PARK SOMEWHERE ELSE AND WALK TO THE STORE. He didn't to himself
@Zedmouse maybe not die, but he had to learn why it's so important to have some manners and follow the rules. He really had no need to park there. He was a stupid man.
@Jan Lima I don’t think stupid is right but probably careless and a bit selfish which is worse but he was also a father and he didn’t need to die in front of his kids over a parking spot
@Zedmouse And that's why it's better to ALWAYS follow the rules. You never know when you're gonna encounter a crazy guy like the one from the video. Like I said, he did it to himself.
If my husband saw some guy at the car window yelling at me and we had small children in the car, he would definitely push him down. He was protecting his family from this wanna be mini mall security guard.
@Cody Parin If someone was harassing your wife, would you just sit there and let them in front of your children? Shooting someone for pushing you isn't the response.
@Cody Parin If you watched the CCTV footage, Marquis (I'm not sure how to spell his name) simply pushed this man away from his wife. Witnesses say there was a lot of yelling which could have caused this reaction. However, you can see Marquis back up and put his arm across his wife in a protecting manner. Until Michael shot him. I also believe that Michael brought up that his shoulder hurt as soon as he was in the room with the detective. Now, I'm not saying you're wrong but I think Marquis is more justifiable in this situation than Michael is.
@Jasper Holloway Not the stereotypical racist comment. Yes there is gang violence but you cannot assume that every person of color isn’t carrying to protect themselves or their family. Guns do fall into the wrong hands ALOT, and it falls into hands like this man who knows his white privilege, as to how he talks to officers, and they act like they are equal or above the law (vigilante).
@Cody Parin Psycho? He was defending his wife that coward was verbally abusing. He drew a firearm and shot despite the man backing away. You don't get a license to kill because someone touched you.
Defending his women from a argument? Be honest and don’t appeal to extremes.. he was murdered but he definitely was the first to physical but a push doesn’t make it okay to shoot someone
@J Money Agreed 100% that that would have been my advice. Don't bother people or play policemen. Especially if you are an armed lard ass that asks to get his ass kicked.
@Frofro frofro Attack my family in a violent shouting tantrum and I’ll end up in jail because I’d do more than push. He wouldn’t have a chance his gun.
He did nothing wrong. If a MAN is arguing with his woman he should defend her and get the “man” tf outta her face. This weak yt man couldn’t stand being pushed by a stronger man- he’s weak and was butt hurt period.
@Staci W We shouldn’t encourage everyone to do whatever they want, break the law, get aggressive when confronted for breaking a law. This guy didn’t have to fire his weapon, no idea why he would do that, but let’s not pretend the fake disabled guy who shoved someone onto the pavement is a victim, because he’s not.
The father was the aggressor. The father pushed him hard after a running start and was looking at him like what's up, waiting for him to get up so he can punch him and fight.
I found the white guy to be very honest about his actions and the distant between them. And I am a liberal who wanted kyle and Chauvin to be found guilty. But I can also understand why Kyle was not.
Don't assault people. Period. The black guy and his girlfriend were looking for a fight after the white guy simply spoke his mind about them illegally parking in a handicap spot with plenty of spots around them. That was stupid and ignorant of them. This guy did nothing wrong.
@:Whatarehumans:3 haven’t seen anyone really saying it’s okay. Only one weirdo saying he deserved it. All they’re saying is he didn’t need to get violent with him that quickly and that situation more than likely wouldn’t have happened. Still, the shooter was 100% in the wrong
@Schmidtygt I didn’t say anyone said it was okay. And besides I’ve seen at least 12 comments in this reply defending the murder of that man. I don’t even see why you’re telling me this? If you feel the shooting was wrong then just say that, you don’t have to tell me that you don’t see any proof of my statement when there is- because a single push is not enough to justify taking someone’s life. Especially when there’s a video that has already dissected the situation.
@Cody Parin ‘psycho’? A man is shouting at his wife and 2 kids while circling their car. Maybe you don’t have the balls to confront someone that’s harassing your family, but other men do. Yeah he probably shouldn’t have pushed him over, but don’t try to act like him being pissed was unjustified.
@Cody Parin Nobody needed to die here. It's plain and simple. Marquis wasn't threatening anyone with serious injury or death. It really didn't escalate that much, and anybody who is well trained with firearms will tell you that if someone is BACKING AWAY from you, nonthreatening, walking away after you point a gun at them, you don't shoot.
@Cody Parin he was a man protecting his own. mind your own fucking business and things would never have a reason to escalate. if the races were flipped he’s be seen as a hero for doing this
@Carl Johannesburg I literally considered that in my original comment. What’s wrong with you? You don’t have to be so rude. I get everyone has an opinion but you could at least be respectful about it. And the stupid thing is I totally agree with you.
@The Ikon Channel This case showed that it indeed is. He paid a pretty high price for that. I dont think he would have been shot down when he just intervened verbally but he wanted to show his "alpha" status there. This ignorance did cost him pretty much everything. (watch him walking to his car kinda relaxed with hands in pockets. He wasnt really concerned)
This is why 1v1 Street fights should be legal nationwide. No jumping, no stomping after a knockdown, just fair one v one hand to hand fuckin combat lol
Jim, I cannot express enough how your work has impacted me. Seeing the way you break these videos down is awe inspiring. Your the detective I never want on my case because I know you would get me no matter what. Your intelligence and delivery is impeccable.
Because of you and how you do this I have been inspired to go back to University and take Criminal Psychology. Truly interesting material. Thank you my friend and I hope your channel never stops. #Lifelongfan
Is anyone going to point out that strange handshake at 4:10
0 likes
Why We Love Film2022-01-29 02:39:27 (edited 2022-01-29 02:40:10 )
This guy is such an idiot. If you’re ever in this situation you just say ”I don’t remember” and “things just happened so fast. I have no idea.”
- So where did he come from?
“I really have no idea.”
- At what point did you fire your weapon?
“Things just happened so fast. I have no idea.”
- What would you say if I told you he didn’t step towards you and in fact took a couple steps back instead?
”I would say that I wish that the entire thing was a blur. I’m just trying to tell you how I remember it happening the best way I can. I was scared for my life.”
He shot the guy only once, his intent was not to kill. In his own (wrongful) mind it was self defense. A woman (i saw on this channel) had killed her baby and lied to the cops....and was let free. This man, yeah, shot and killed a guy, but it clearly wasn't his intent and he told the absolute truth about what happened. See the difference? A baby murdering psycho got away LEGALLY, while this guy got 20 years.
Zero self deffence that was murder ur life was not in danger he did not continue to assault u after he pushed u he was simply getting u away from his women because u were Ina hostile state of mind you are simply a nosey coward who should have minded his business
tbh... I feel like the black man was aggressive (understandably) from the time he pulled his pant's up until the time he made first contact with the victim. What a weird way to ask someone what the problem is. pushing them to the ground...
That is the problem why is someone not teaching them 1. Mind their business and 2 they can go to jail just was well as everyone else…. Just stupid he really looked like he thought he did what was “ok” for “him” to do. Smh he thought it would be nothing even in his verdict he looked angry that how dare they hold him accountable. Smh
From the tape I see that the guy from the shop applied physical force first (so, he escalated the existing conflict started by the armed guy), and he intended to do something else right before the guy pointed a gun at him. The fatal mistake of the armed guy was to shoot in the impulse of feelings for revenge. Do not escalate conflicts. The big guy from the shop evaluated the guy as a danger for the family? I do not think so, he, apparently, simply did not like the rude tone and allowed himself for the escalation. He is also sort of guilty, though, the price he paid was way too high. Peace.
It’s fascinating to me that when the detective asks him how many steps the man took toward him, he says in full confidence, “One,” like he’s some kind of super-observant marksman; when in reality he just gave away that he understood what he was doing and was in complete control the whole time and not reacting out of fear/perceived threat.
Edit: nevermind the fact that the man actually stepped AWAY from the shooter
Christopher Crentsil he got quieter but I think that was only because he realized that he was in deeper shit at that point. All he had to say was more to try to justify his shitty actions. I hope he gets the full 30 years behind bars.
His lawyer had the nerve to say the defendant is the true victim.....he clearly didn't give a shit about his client to come up with a better closing argument
@CatRoxy86 actually,he approached the car not knowing the fact that the woman was black so I think he could have done that to anyone. He just wanted to seek for trouble..
The difference in that is that one is enforceable and one is not. One inconveniences average people, the other does a lot more than inconvenience people who already have it hard enough.
@Mansnotprot And?? Nobody said they wasnt breaking the law, but ultimately their actions didn't put anyone life in danger. That's like saying jay walking is as bad as 1st degree murder. No matter if his intentions were good, the killer can't just go around acting like he can enforce laws as he pleases: he's not being paid to be a recognized figure of the public that knows & enforces laws. His initial confrontation can be seen as harrassment, doesnt mean I can try and arrest him for it. Harping on what the victims did just distracts from the fact that the killer should've just called police instead of acting like he is.
@Gioconda me being a good person would approach the vehicle and tell them that they parked in a handicap spot without a tag, and hope that they respond nicely rather than start yelling at me.
The problem is, is that she wasn't illegally parked in the first place. handicap spaces have the same law as fire zones: you can park in them as long as the driver is in the car and can get out of the way if needed, which is why the detective asked him around 16:30 if the car was running. She literally did nothing wrong.
@Deshra Dine All parking spaces in front are closer to entrance. I'm handicapped. She was in the car, as allowed by law, and could move out, if needed.
@Giocondapeople I know own a buisness here in town.. People are always parking in handicap spots in front if his store.. He tells them to move 4 a few reasons... A. Police will ticket you. B. Handicap people require those spots. C. Open your eyes.. Wake up.. Don't be a Dick to handicap people..
@Paul Burke yeah...but that doesn't explain why he shot him though..
I mean,I perfectly agree with what u said,but still he illegally parked too and shot a man that was retreating..
1 like
Paul Burke2021-08-06 21:14:44 (edited 2021-08-06 21:52:33 )
@Gioconda I hear you... Its full of aggravated intent and action on both sides... Plenty of personal choice.. The problems arise because at least in my mind is that while one person may shy away from a gun in hand like they don't want to get shot it doesnt mean its ever over. In fact its often just begining... And it can be an ongoing issue for all people involved... I think fear of those conciquences caused a man to shoot another...consider why one man physically assaults tge other and that could be a deciding factor in pulling the trigger... Sane people don't attack others over a verbal argument... He may have thought if I don't he will just attack k me later when my gun is concealed and my back is turned.. Clearly it wasnt an issue debated for long in regards to the initial assaulter because he assaulted an unaware individual.. How many people have died from being blindsided and punched?? Plenty... No gun or weapon doesnt mean the assault isn't deadly... I tho k he shot the man because he was afraid for his life... An attack liie this is quite jarring.. Sudden.. The choice to shoot looked like he paused and decided that the assault was enough no matter the manner of retreat.. Ive been tge victim of a senseless physical assault.. Not committing to my iwn defense has left me with a tbi and has stolen aspects of my personality... If I had followed through in my own defense ID at least not be burdened with a disabling reminder... Uf Soneone assaults you your best to just defend yourself fully. Its not worth it to allow the resulting issues from giving the assaulter the bennifit of doubt... Because some people don't stop until you or someone else stops them.. With a bullet or fist.. In this case the man whom was assaulted his disadvantage is his size.. Strength and his inability to have seen the threat until it was assaulting him and then the further steps past the assault to further the intimidation and threat... I say justified... Hell have to disappear fir his protection...
@Jesus Valdez I think that u don't really have the right to say what's wrong or not,because it will always be your opinion,and what is right for u can be the opposite for another. Anyway,I think that if they swap places (the black man shot the white man) we wouldn't be here talking about it..
@Paul Burke I'm sorry, I don't understand. Even though u were so scared that u would pull a gun,if u saw him retreating (almost) no one would have took a life for nothing. He could have pull the gun then,Seeing him retreating, he could have said a simple" Come any closer and I will shoot",or I don't know.. ANYTHING. And there's the fact that,as we know,he was in the military so he knows what he's doing and where he is shooting...so why the heck shoot him in heart?? I'm talking about an experienced man here. Why not,as the lawyer said, in the foot or In the shoulder,in one of his leg ??? I don't know...I mean I think it's better Hurt him than kill him. If someone with no experience at all(about shooting a gun) was that scared to shoot him in a pretty deadly/dangerous place,he still wouldn't shoot him in the heart because he isn't capable of (the black man was walking/moving,so if u really have no experience is really hard to shot him straight in the heart) .
@Gioconda I think life shows us different... I think one man chose to violently assault another.. Blindsided... While you or Someone else would have done differently the fact is we werent there.. We arent the one being attacked...i think he was within his rights to shoot due to the nature of which he was assaulted.. Meaning no reason for the initial assault or physical violence.. The driving force and motive seem to me to be reckless..ill advised..unsane... As if there was no concern or discerning of threat requiring actual violence... Meaning psychotic... The treat to life still exists... Bottom line...irrational actions of violence shouldnt be given leanancy in a defense... The psychotic assault is enough to warrent defense of individual life and liberty with deadly force...
@Paul Burke as I said before,he was in the military. I don't know what u exactly do in there(I've never been in the military) but the thing that I'm certain is that it's not easy to get in. this kind of experience he all have been practicing it. So what I'm saying here is that he knew what he was doing,and instead of hurting him badly he decided to kill him. There's no justification in that. I wouldn't have said all this if he was a person without an experience in this kind of things. Secondly,no one is in right to kill another human being.
@Gioconda I agree.. He knew what he was doing... Training kicks in... I do kniw that.. But training gets amendments as you survive and watch others die... It looked to me like the guy that got shot was all pumped up to make some hurt on the other guy until the defensive weapon was out . fear yes comes next for both... Could you imagine surviving war just to come home to be snuffed out by some jerk off wanna be bad boy??? Out to flex on you??.. Over a verbal argument involving parking issues???... Arent you mad that this was part of what at least one black male thought was appropriate actions???.. I am... And im only black by association...
Hall Monitor syndrome. Probably wanted to be a cop, probably couldn't do it. It's the same issue plaguing the "bad" cops.
0 likes
Paul Burke2021-08-09 03:07:40 (edited 2021-08-09 03:08:36 )
@Dave Baton do these confrontations involve people threatening him with physical violence when hes only verbally confronting others???... And is he justified or within his rights like everyone else to take part in verbal discorse without a need for physical violence until a threat is made to harm him or someone else??.....
0 likes
Paul Burke2021-08-09 03:29:34 (edited 2021-08-09 03:32:03 )
@FormulaZR that's everybody... Everyone git bad attitudes... Delusions of being bigger and badder than the situation or life requires... And usually its been found to be true that these incidents require several Narsacistic and deluded personallities to transpire.. One side will argue they have the right to physically assault someone because of words they over heard... In this case it seems that it indeed is the case.. To prevent being shot in this senario or shooting someone lets walk through it to see what's causing the event to unfold and willingly manifest... Did anyone have to assault someone physically here.??... Did someone physically assault someone??.. Did the assault seem justified as a defensive act??.. Is tge shooting required?? Is the use of a firearm justified by law and by threat???... Is there a history of threat to harm physically a valid reaction??.. If the verbal arguments didn't involve the shooter initiating a physical threat verbally or physically than depending on state or county laws he is within his rights to announce his firearm as a defensive weapon if there is a threat made verbally or physically by other parties involved... Meaning if one person isn't making threats to harm or in any way hurt or kill in the space or duration of a verbal argument and another party is threatening physical harm to body or property either in the moment or as a promusary threat of intention than a verbalized announcement of intent to defend ones life is legal.. And it is the instigating threat if violence death or bodily harm that is seen as the guilty or offending party... Meaning arguments can be had over parking spaces without threatening to harm someone... But physically assaulting someone like we see in the video is not legal and can be seen as intent to do all the things criminally people have problems with... If one person says anything about harming another or states intent to kill before the mention of a gun then it is the original offense of threat physically that isn't justifiable with physical assault... That's self defense law..
@Jésus S Killing isn't necessarily illegal, murder is. If someone attacks you and you take their life in self defense it is a justified killing, not murder. Intent is a necessary component.
@Gioconda self-defense, Florida is a stand your ground law state, meaning no duty to retreat and justification for deadly force when someone assaults you. (as always with the law, it depends on the situation, but the law reads "right to use reasonable force" applying it to this case, Drejka was on the ground after being assaulted, he would've been justified legally had he not spoken to police and let his lawyer use the law for his defense).
@FormulaZR incorrect assumption. Many precincts have a program that will allow citizens to send pictures of vehicles that park illegally in handicap spaces so that they can ticket the offenders. Doesn't require being an officer.
@Cecile King Incorrect. From the 2020 statues on handicap parking in Florida. "316.1955 Enforcement of parking requirements for persons who have disabilities.— (1) It is unlawful for any person to stop, stand, or park a vehicle within, or to obstruct, any such specially designated and marked parking space provided in accordance with s. 553.5041, unless the vehicle displays a disabled parking permit issued under s. 316.1958 or s. 320.0848 or a license plate issued under s. 320.084, s. 320.0842, s. 320.0843, or s. 320.0845, and the vehicle is transporting the person to whom the displayed permit is issued." This is similar to how EVERY handicap parking law is written. So NO, one cannot even STOP a car in a handicapped space without having the proper placard/tag. The ONLY exception in FL is this; " (3) Any person who is chauffeuring a person who has a disability is allowed, without need for a disabled parking permit or a special license plate, to stand temporarily in any such parking space, for the purpose of loading or unloading the person who has a disability. A penalty may not be imposed upon the driver for such temporary standing."
The law is clear, if you don't have a plate/placard, you don't even stop your vehicle in that space.
It would behoove you to actually know the laws before making incorrect statements regarding them. Yes she was illegally parked, and in the wrong.
@Paul Burke No matter what...you feel murdering another for a push is justified. If you saw a man verbally assaulting your wife with children in car ...would you be concerned? The gun holder was a coward and made an irresponsible irreversible decision regarding another human's life that he did not value in his rush to be right
@Cecile King i feel murder can happen from a push... It has happened.. One punch can and has killed people old and young... Further more an argument over a parking spot does not require a physical assault like we saw here... Do you??... Its a sign of really poor judgment... Possibly an issue regarding psychosis.. I played football and getting hit from behind is illegal for a reason... People can get extreemly hurt ir worse... Those that commit the fouls get flagged or ejected... Penalties... Im not saying life is a game of football.. Its dead serious... And everybody needs to see that as clear in this video...
@Cecile King secondly... I don't have a wife.. If I did she wouldnt be knowingly parking in a handicap spot.. And she wouldnt be arguing with someone over it if she had.. And of course im not into women that would..
This is America Don't catch you slippin' now Don't catch you slippin' now Look what I'm whippin' now This is America This is what this case remember me
the cops were so nice to this guy to keep him talking and make him comfortable. if the the cops were aggressive with him he probably would have asked for a lawyer.. they did a great job..
He should have asked for a lawyer. Any decent lawyer worth their salt would have had the charges dismissed before ever going before a jury. The lawyer would have instantly pointed out that the moment of "hesitation" before firing was caused by disorientation from falling so violently.
@Southern Soul Nah it's on video, you can't initiate a confrontation and then kill someone when they react to you shit talking their wife and children.
@DoyouknowJOGIJOGI? you know there’s plenty of lawyers who defend killers, rapists, pedos because it’s their job? have you seen the other video of a lawyer smiling after getting a Mom who drowned her daughter a Not Guilty verdict? while completely morally wrong, it’s their job
@Southern Soul i see you're getting targeted by everybody for defending the guy though you're just saying what he should have done FOR HIMSELF and to save himself and not what he should have done for justice
@pyluts 2 there has to be people who defends the bad guy as hard as they can, just in case things were more complicated than it appears to be. not a big deal for us who watch, just another fucked up guy better throw him in prison anyways, but no it's still a life on the line
Reading someone their right should be interpreted as "do you want a lawyer? Because here's the part where we incriminate you." So many people disregard their rights n sign away like it's the check at the end of a meal.
As a disabled veteran with handicap plates on my vehicle, it is a pet peeve of mine as well when people take up ADA handicap designated parking without proper plates or placards, but I wouldn't shoot someone over it. Even if the gentleman pushed me down, I'd just call the cops and press charges for the assault. It was wrong for that guy to shove the shooter down, but that definitely wasn't an "eye for an eye" situation. The shooter was definitely in the wrong for shooting that man.
i can understand drawing a firearm after the initial shove to the ground, but once the guy saw the gun, he backed off. thats when Michael here should have put his gun away and called the police.
The funny thing is that the Ada designated parking slot was further away from the entrance than the normal parking area 🤪 to say anything to the woman parking further away would be stupid af.
I’m sure you wouldn’t yell at a woman in a parking lot either! Of course the boyfriend would’ve felt protective over her, with some random strange man yelling at her in front of their kids. No excuse for what he did at all.
How bout gun control. It's a serious problem in the US. A person got killed here and he's not even sorry one bit and worried about his injured arm and his family. Like dude you just killed a father in front of his kids for absolutely no reason. We didn't hear the argument but Marquist saw Michael being 'aggressive' with his wife and arguing and shoved him as a 'wtf get away from my wife and kids' reaction. Seriously though GUN CONTROL! Cause these situations only happen in the US.
I think we all know what he really felt threatened by. It wasn't being pushed to the ground - it was being pushed by a black man. No amount of backing away could have altered that perception.
@Litzalocks Get yourself a drink and calm down🤦♂️😅 your aggression is ridiculous and would probably lead to the same situation we saw here. I see no problem in parking in a disabled spot, as long as I'm in the car and can get away immediately when a disabled person arrives. My point was that the disabled parking spot was further away than the ordinary ones which makes no sense. So if I couldn't walk that good I'd prefer to take a spot closer to the door. Where I'm from disabled parking spots are the ones that are closest to the door and that by law....
@Litzalocks Don't assume they need to ask me🤦♂️ I'll leave immediately as soon someone arrives... It's absolutely OK and I never had any problems with any kind of aggression or even a bad look. and yes, you sound aggressive. If this I your normal behavior I know why you can't see this...cause it's normal for you. I said where I'm from. Where could you know where this is and how it's handled here? 😅🤦♂️
@Litzalocks I'm the reason for disabled person getting their life harder and I don't respect them cause I park in a disabled spot while sitting in the car and leaving immediately as soon as another car arrives? You're insane
@Rowan Thomas sadly gun control wouldn’t really work in America since they already have so many guns. It really only works if a country does it before they have a lot of guns in circulation
@Fluse Int. ur not in the right. But going up to someone and fighting them in a parking lot about it is not ok. I would just assume they are a asshole and move on.
@Diego one word Australia. It can be done. It might be be easy because of what everyone is used to, but like I said, Australia did it, so it can be done.
@Fluse Int. Bruh I don’t know where you are from but parking in a handicap stop is definitely illegal, definitely not ok and it’s usually the most expensive ticket you can receive from police. It’s more expensive than parking in a fire/emergency Lane.
@Epicriku91 no one is saying that it’s a good reason to shoot someone just because they parked in a handicap spot. If this dude has health problems, he’s not going to want to get into a physical fight. This dude told her to move and that it was wrong and immediately she’s like let me get my man. He gets shoved and he’s already in a bad position defensively. He should’ve pulled his gun and not shot but if the dude was going to keep coming with him on the ground in a terrible position to defend himself then yeah I can see someone getting shot for that. The guy shouldn’t have shoved him just for talking to his girl about parking in a handicap parking spot illegally. Like seriously look at both sides of the ridiculousness here. Drejka shouldn’t have shot, but he also shouldn’t have gotten shoved either.
@Diego Done control with and work here in America not because of how many guns they already are...... But because it's already so much gun control laws anyways that people just don't realize. Clearly Michael Not have the shoot that guy for getting stuff down but it is justified that if he was being attacked that he was able to pull out his gun. Crazy thing is though is if he didn't have ACWP which is a license to carry a fire arm which I do have then He was carrying a gun illegally... Which is against the law.... Unless of course this is a open carry State
@Litzalocks he didn’t deserve to die over a handicapped spot though it’s like literally not that serious I understand that it’s a jerk move but like you can’t just go around shooting people he was arguing with a woman and her husband came over and pushed him away because he was probably being aggressive and he shoots him like he didn’t even need to shoot him even if he pulled out his gun he purposely shot him while the dude was backing away from him that dude just wanted to kill somebody
As a person with a three digits IQ, I figured out he shiot the dude over physical assaults (that was to be followed by a beat up on the ground), and not over the plate
Granted the family shouldn't have parked in the disabled spot, but I can understand why given that she had several young kids who can be a handful at times.
Nor should the father shoved the guy for harassing his wife about it. But there was no justification for shooting him after he'd spread his hands and stepped back several times.
@Rowan Thomas It can't realistically be done. There were just 3 army personnel charged in connection to a huge gun supply ring. Military weapons being stolen and sold on blackmarket inside the US. It will only raise the value of weapons and ammunition and for years only the law abiding citizens will suffer for it, as always. As long as police and military have weapons, they will make their way to the criminals. Are you for diisarming the police? Honest question
@Milos Korenev I bet your black arnt you. I live in London and have been stabbed 3 times. Dosnt mean I carry a knife. I stand my ground and fight. I box travellers often. I don’t often win. But we both walk together with open palms and fight like a man
@Rowan Thomas gun control won't work most countries that implemented it have ended up with worse problems such as higher gun violence/more tyranny in the government Venezuela (I think) or a increase in knife attacks in the case of Britain or people won't turn in guns at all such as Norway in some place like Australia it does work. Also situations like these don't happen in the U.S. only you just watch news from the U.S. more than you do other countries
@adsffdaaf Because white americans have been conditioned for centuries to perceive blackness as inherently threatening. Which is horrifying, lest you misunderstand me.
I mean the guy was yelling at his wife while all his kids were in the car, I’m not a father but I’m sure that anyone would get defensive of their family in that situation.
@Fluse Int. Bruh, why don’t you get it? Just literally don’t park there. What the hell, it’s for their convenience. You just don’t wanna back down huh, literally everyone is agreeing with the disabled spot not being for everyone.
@Epicriku91 It wasn’t a good reason, but it’s a great topic to talk about. Just cuz what happened wasn’t right, doesn’t mean that the victim’s family was spotless clean as well.
@Fluse Int. Sure, you could be guarding the parking lot and drive away as soon as you see someone, but I highly doubt you're paying that much attention. So why not just park in a normal spot like the rest of us? There's no reason not to.
If I was a disabled vet I'd probably draw too, but he clearly backed off after that. There was no reason to shoot except bad judgement. Hard to comment though since I've never been in the military, or pushed down in public, or get annoyed enough to make a scene about some asshole's parking.
im not handicapped and that's my biggest pet peeve too i hate when i see people parked in blue parking spaces, but I've never seen one. I've also heard police respond just as fast to illegal handicapped parking don't understand why he took into his own hands except he's a psychopath.
@Milos Korenev I don’t know about that. Being pushed to the ground when you don’t expect it really gets your adrenaline going, the fight or flight reaction takes over.
@Luuk Where I'm from, and I'm happy it's not America, it's allowed to stay 3 min on almost every spot even if parking isn't allowed there. This short period disturbs nobody and requires your attention to keep an eye on the road...so yes I think I would see it. Anyway in my home country are that much disabled parking spots that this situation never ever occurred.
@boozoochamp Like I said here before, where I'm from its allowed to stay for 3min almost everywhere while sitting in the car. So don't speak about ridiculousness and tell me I get a ticket😅 It's ridiculous that you think I'm doing this to provoke someone. Sometimes it's just the best option. I'll give you a little example perhaps you guys calm down then a little bit since you all seem to have a huge lack of fantasy. In front of the doctor, where my mom has to go on regular basis just to get a new recipe... So it usually doesn't take longer than the magical 3 mins, which are allowed to stay on a disabled spot while sitting in the car. (Again: Where I'm from🤦♂️😅) I do it and it's perfectly fine. My mom isn't the youngest woman anymore and I can't go in for her. There has never ever been a salty situation l. Never. Cause everytime a car arrives you'll just leave immediately. This means the disabled person who wants to park has to wait approximately 5-10seconds till I parked out. If this is behaving like an asshole when I'm staying in every rule and law there is, than I'm guilty of being an asshole. But again there has never been a aggressive or stressful situation for anyone. Perhaps it's also the people here without guns and much more respect for each other than in the US I don't know. But here the people are not that aggressive in general. The least of them here could even imagine to kill someone to defend themselves cause there is no need for that. I think the people here are just much more realistic and calm compared to you in the US.
Watching the interview the only thing I’m thinking is this guy has no consideration or no thoughts about the possible consequences or ramifications of his actions. I’m not talking jail time, I’m talking about the possibility of ruining someone’s life, or ending it or both. In this instance he’s ended 1 and ruined 4. Yet at no point in the interview did he put any thought into it, even when he said he heard someone shout “my kids”.
Edit: it also sounds like this was one of those situations where a lawyer would not have just been good but great. A lawyer would have actually been the difference between jail and walking free. Glad he didn’t get one coz I know that dad didn’t deserve being shot let alone murdered.
Meh, dead dude was the only one to introduce violence. They're both stupid, but you start swinging for any reason you'd better expect to be smacked back.
@harrod19 without sound its hard to say. Imagine being in his position, coming out of a store and seeing some random dude shouting at your wife/kids. On top of that he didn't pull out any weapons himself and just like the police and everyone else said the guy was actually retreating the moment he recognised a gun was being drawn. At that moment the dude on the floor can't claim self defence as the presence of a gun had basically eliminated any threat without actually needing to be fired
@harrod19 it's beyond clear that he didn't need to shoot the gun because the moment he pulled it out the other guy distanced himself from him. He could've easily put an end to the situation (a situation he deliberately started), but chose to shoot him instead. It's also beyond clear that the armed dude was one of dem wannabe 'Murican heroes looking for an excuse to shoot someone because he stopped and parked illegaly in order to start a heated (and hostile) argument with a stranger over something that didn't concern him, and got the response he wanted when the other guy pushed him after being provoked when he yelled at his girlfriend. Anyone in their right mind would've come to the same conclusion: the use of deadly force was unjustified no matter how you look at it, and he escalated the whole thing because he deliberately wanted to. Also, he already had a record. Don't try to defend the undefendable. In fact, according to the evidence, if anyone had a reason to escalate the situation and whose actions might be justified, it was the black dude. He saw his girlfriend being yelled at by a stranger in a hostile manner and did what he felt was necessary to protect her. Many more people would buy this narrative over the other, basically because it seems to be true.
@Yasin Syed exactly, once the gun was brought out the conflict was basically ended. He could've gotten back in his car and drove away, there was no need to actually fire. The dude was definitely not engaging with him at that point. Of course that being said, he shouldn't have shoved him to the ground in the first place. They both overreacted but the push definitely wasn't going to kill someone, the bullet did.
@Yasin Syed If someone was yelling at my wife and kids I would yell at him, not shove him into the pavement. That doesn't mean Drejka was justified in killing him, of course, but the dead dude initiated the violence when it was previously not on the table.
If you want to imagine being in anyone's position, imagine being in Drejka's position, where you're arguing with an obtuse woman who has violated the law and essentially disrespected the disabled, which you consider yourself to be, greatly inconveniencing you all the while, and you are stricken to the pavement from behind without any warning or hints of violence. You get your gun out to face your assailant, and you see him move. You've just been thrown to the pavement; is he moving towards you or away from you? If he's moving towards you, do you have time to tell before he's upon you and swipes your gun from you? In hindsight we can tell the dead guy was moving away from him, but if you've just been thrown to the ground unexpectedly when adrenaline is already high, and are responding to an attacker, movement is movement.
Again, I don't think Drejka was justified in a hindsight 20/20 scenario where everyone has a built in Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System and can slow down time to see what exactly the threat is while also distancing yourself emotionally from the engagement, but in regards to what went down I think it was tricky and unfortunate. However, this tricky and unfortunate situation was entirely brought on by the dead dude, who initiated violence when it was not necessary, even emotionally. The natural response to shouting is to shout back, not to assault someone from behind.
harrod19 Getting shot is more than “a smack back”. Sure he shouldn’t have pushed him but if you hear loud yelling and come out to see a dude in your girls face you’re probably not thinking too straight. A push is not punishable by death.
I don’t think he would have walked free but his lawyer probably could have convinced people to go easy on him if were for the lies and calloused statements.
harrod19 he didn’t “smash” anyone. He pushed the guy away who was being verbally aggressive towards his family. In no way does that justify the gun being fired. Maybe a fist fight? Maybe just drawing the gun? But to fire it directly at him was uncalled for
If you're immediate reaction to somebody calling you out for taking somebody's handicap spot is violence then you SHOULD be put down. You have no place in polite society
@Green Anon no, but if you smacked me in the face and then I drew my gun and you backed off then I would consider the conflict ended and I would drive away. You kinda forgot the whole gun part eh?
@Yasin Syed Exact conversation I was looking for. The guy should have never pushed him on the ground. But does that justify shooting someone? I don't think so. Also like you said and its obvious, as soon as he pulled out his handgun the incident was immediately neutralized.
@Green Anon I missed the "and then turn around and walk away" part of your amazing example. Why exactly would you randomly smack someone and then walk away? How am I supposed to answer such a ridiculous question in the first place? I mean I wouldn't start chasing you to smack you back but I certainly would be shouting "what the fuck was that for"?! The conflict in the video wasn't just a random shove, there was a reason behind it and the dude obviously wasn't aiming to continue the fight or he would've been on him and kicking him immediately, not slowing to a stop and adjusting his pants like we see in the video. So I'm sure the "fight" could've stopped right there and it DEFINITELY could've stopped once the pistol was out and both the black dude and the white dude on the sidewalk take multiple steps away from it.
This man was berating a woman for foolishness, he absolutely initiated the whole issue. Verbally abusing someone is a violent act. Furthermore he is a man doing this to a woman. Wtf - he had done this previously and pulled a gun on other people including a mother and children. He was looking for trouble, had that woman asserted herself a certain way he would have likely shot her.
mike h doubt that would’ve helped much. Other guy was actively looking to cause problems and would have found another excuse. Moreover, if it wasn’t this dad, it would’ve been someone else soon
You talk about lives ruined and lost, but imagine a world where the first person to introduce violence into a non violent situation was shot and killed. EVery. Time.
There would be many less lives lost and ruined once we cut out those weeds from society.
Dogald Trump people aren’t saying he’s not responsible for his actions the black dude that is. We’re just saying you don’t murder people because you get pushed over that’s common sense
Dogald Trump I think the guy realizes he made a mistake in the heat of the moment, but that’s why this is a manslaughter charge. It’s why you shouldn’t look for confrontation without being trained in how to deal with it, because even if you’re innocent your life will be hell for a bit as you get cycled through the justice system.
@Scott Jackson he wasn't innocent, he was guilty. It is very clear. And at no stage does he ever show "realization that he made a mistake". He shows zero remorse. He has a record for threatening to shoot people.
The lady’s face behind the defense attorney saying “One man is already gone, do we want to take another mans life away” is accurate. That attorney was ridiculous!
The defense attorney calling him “the REAL victim” was even more ridiculous. I’m sure the jury responded realllly well to that. That defense attorney is just atrocious!
Meh, I don't know I thought he was doing ok. Hitting the patriotic notes, and yada yada. You never know, he might snag a sympathetic juror. Seriously though, there are worse defenses, the Twinkie defense for one. I think the real tragedy here is his tie.
He had a really difficult case to defend. The video said it all, there was enough time to realize that the aggressor was backing off and not a threat anymore and there ain't no way you're gonna defend your way outta that.
@Zamerus People tend to forget that defense lawyers are required to defend their client regardless of how defensible the client is. An attorney's not an asshole for being on the "wrong side," there has to be a defense to test the merit of the prosecution's case. Sometimes there's no convincing argument to make, but you can't just pull an ...And Justice For All and proclaim your own client "should go right to fuckin' jail."
@a nu start Assault ...yes. Aggressive... definitely not. The attack wasn't even sustained it lasted a fraction of a second. Cars are not bulletproof so you can't say she was safe in the car. This guy had a history of actively getting himself into confrontational situations and flashing his gun. The actions of a fragile mind.
A cop would have been exonerated. This man was in the right to defend himself. He should not have pulled the trigger but in that moment i feel hes still justified in his actions because you dont have years, months, weeks, days, hours, or even minutes to make heads or tails of whats going on. They railroaded this man
DancingOdie I actually don’t think he was railroaded. His response was disproportionate. He was the victim of a single push and there was no signal of anything further. No threats were made. Marquise wasn’t approaching him. So what exactly was he defending himself from?
Plain wrong. The video shows that the wife has stepped out of the car and is standing in front of Drejka at the moment her husband pushes him. I think he was prompted to push Drejka away from his wife because he felt Drejka was threatening his wife, it's clear that voices are raised. He didn't take a run and tackle Drejka, and he didn't punch Drejka. Do you think Drejka would've taken a step back if the husband had asked him nicely? I think the husband's actions were instinctive and the level of force proportionate. What happened afterwards was just 'revenge' from a scumbag who felt belittled and had had his 'authority' questioned. The husband was backing away when he pointed the gun. Cold-blooded murder.
It would be interesting to see an interrogation of an innocent person to see how they would react. Like if the interrogator isn't professional or correct in the readings of body language and behavior of the person.
I believe there was actually one on this channel but it looks like it's been moved to the Patreon. Forgot the name of the guy but they essentially lied about evidence to get him to admit to it and he never cracked and was found not guilty.
There's two videos I know of that feature it but they're both Patreon only.
One is an interview of Michael Dixon, you can find the video link on their Patreon post "TMCPI (1-7)" The video is called "Michael Dixon, Shayna Hubers, Thomas Chan"
The other is actually an anonymous sexual assault victim being sternly questioned by a detective who tries to get her to admit she is lying or embellishing details about the assault. The video link is in their Patreon post called "The Most Compelling Police Interrogations Part 9"
@Madi Meyer Thanks dude I recently subbed since it is only 1 usd
2 likes
Laika Husky2021-03-16 14:29:39 (edited 2021-03-16 14:32:59 )
I did a little digging about Drejka after watching this video again (great content, btw!). Turns out, one of those previous incidents that JCS mentioned was at the same location, over the same dumb parking space issue. Ricky Kelly, a truck driver, alleged that Drejka threatened Kelly's life with a firearm and used racial slurs during the altercation. The owner of the store came out and threatened to call the police if Drejka didn't cut the shit, Drejka allegedly replied "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After that interaction, Drejka made a complaint to the company that Kelly drove for. In the recorded call saying that Kelly was "lucky I didn't blow his head off."
Drejka has done this bullshit song and dance before, throwing around his weight like the big boy he thinks he is only emboldened by the presence of a deadly weapon, with zero regard for the damage he could cause using it. He knew exactly what he was doing.
If true, that makes sense. He dreamed of this for years. I suspect he lived in a right-wing bubble where he believed cops held different standards for some than others, and that he would be treated as a hero by them for exercising his 2nd amendment rights. However, you can't go pick a fist-fight and then shoot a guy running away. But he does have SOMETHING in common with heroes... the superpower of 'super healing.' He was in such pain he couldn't talk at the start but within minutes he was 100% fine.
All the video evidence supports this a man who is defending himself wouldn’t shoot a man backing up he even backed up almost to the point of turning around completely and he still shot the guy, this was something he wanted to do for a long time the man wants a problem with anyone and in jail he’ll get plenty but won’t have a gun to hide behind.
And now he got assaulted in jail and doesn’t have his weapon to save his ass lol. Coward doesn’t know what to do now that he doesn’t have his gun to save him lmao.
@Ninja Shogun You don't want to live in any bubble. Right, Left, or otherwise. If you want to see what a Leftist bubble looks like, go search "Rose Twitter." If you want to see what a Right Wing bubble looks like, watch this disabled guy humble-brag to police about killing a man while using stilted gun-magazine tacticool lingo.
@Seth Hamm based on everything else people in the comments have added about his character. it really does makes sense, he had been looking for this opportunity to shoot someone. it took him 20 years to plan and try to find even the slightest of reason to pull out his firearm.
Guys clearly traumatised from his time in the service - guy killed a lot of trees in his time man, and was severely wounded in a bonsai attack which left him stumped for life. As a Sapper myself, I treely understand his plight.
I wonder if he's twigged that his conduct is logged with a criminal record that will never leaf him no matter how hard he tries to branch out. It's in his best interest to get to the root of the problem. I hope his therapist takes trunk calls now that he's in custody as he's clearly barking mad.
@silas frisenette he speaks and acts as though he's a military or police veteran, but his actual trade was as a tree surgeon so we're just ripping on him for acting like he knows what he's talking about 😅
@rockstarJDP it's just too bad he had to draw xylem. It saps me down to my roots that a stick in the mud like dumb-ass Douglas here can cause such pain.
The fact that he said "thank you" to the officer after being informed he killed a man, a father, a husband in front of his family made me SCREAM. This man is absolutely vile.
We would all be dead dude acted like he got tackled n his poor elbow n wrist what a wimp and then said he was coming at him when the gun clearly made him back up. N the thing is if u wanna fuck someone up n u got to start off pushing like that u prob gonna charge immediately seemed like he just pushed the shit out of him but still a normal push not a running push even but just a push to say wtf u doing yelling at my wife not a im gonna fuck u up type of movements dude was backing up wtf manslaughter ?!??
I know. For real. This guy acting like the driver sped into the last available handicapped parking spot to beat out another car with an actual placard. And even if this was the case, him shooting the man as he was backing off was way overboard.
@nonni139 yeah i’m pretty sure most people in this comment section agree that it’s wrong to take handicap spots if you don’t have a sticker, but that doesn’t justify being shot to death for. don’t know why you even bother bringing that up.
@nonni139 the fact is this guy ONLY started anything because he had a gun and was ready to use it. His gun was his motivator, not the handicapped spot. I guarantee he wouldn’t have said anything to her had he not been hiding his gun. That’s what these guys do. They start trouble then when someone responds, they keep pushing until it gets physical. Then they can use their gun and claim “self defense”.
I couldn't help but think both of these men are at fault for their lack of being able to control their emotions. The homie shoving a handicap man over for his confrontation about the spot. Then Micheal responding with shooting him dead. Both unable to control themselves.
@Mitchell Monroe I feel the victim is a little more justified as there were children in the car. I’m pretty sure race influenced both their actions, as a black man seeing a white man yelling at his family in a parking lot he thinks the worst… the shooter also was probably more scared because he is black.
Wether your racist or not- your perception of a threat is naturally increased if said threat is coming from somebody of a different race. I believe studies have shown that this most apparent between black and white people, even if the threatened person is racist or not.
there were empty parking spaces on all sides of her. assuming a handicapped person drove up they could just park in the next one over no fuss. this dude was just looking for an excuse to get in a fight
@Nate McCollum I don't get the point of your comment. Regardless of if the victim acted out of racial motivation, if he "assumed the worst" clearly he assumed right.
@Daniel G literally not at all lmao they were parked there probably no more than 15 minutes, making a big fuss about this when no other disabled person needed the spot at that time is the definition of a Karen tho
@Daniel G it’s only a problem when a disabled person needs the spot and the non-disabled person doesn’t leave from the spot. There were people waiting in the car so that seemingly means that they were only gonna stay there for a little bit & ready to leave.
@Daniel G you just used a reductio ad absurdum. Which even the narrator of this video said (in another video) that this kind of logic is used by guilty people. Not a good way of proving a point and makes you sound like the 5 year old
@Aussie Jules yeah I noticed it wasn’t the literal closest, but was the most convenient in terms of getting in and out—thanks for catching that & informing me about how that spot wasn’t even considered a proper handicap spot
@Daniel G wow. They were BOTH parking illegally, regardless, this shouldn't turn into an argument. I wouldn't be yelling at a mother in front of her kids to move their car unless I was disabled and sincerely needed that spot, its called minding your business. The husband would have taken less than 5 minutes to buy the snacks and they would have left peacefully. No one should have gotten shot over this. Husband was defending his wife against her aggressor.
@Taryn Thomas A normal person wouldn't park in a handicap spot in the first place, a normal person would park somewhere else if pointed out she is parked in a handicap spot, a normal person than wouldn't start a dispute when she is in the wrong especially with her children in the car, a normal person doesn't start immediately with a physical confrontation, definitely with his children in a car, and a normal person obviously doesn't shoot someone when pushed on the ground in front of the victim kids. There is no innocent person in this situation. One person is just way more horrible than the other two
@Amy Mendez Wait are you talking about intelligence and education? Because that’s what “being cultured” means. If so, then white Americans are more cultured than most other races.
@Amy Mendez Hi, actual disabled person here (paraplegic), while I don’t think anyone should have been killed for parking in the handicapped spot, they shouldn’t have parked there if they were not disabled. It’s not a “I’ll only be here for a minute” spot, it’s a spot specifically for those with disabilities. I’m sure you’re aware of that. The spots are bigger to allow for wheelchair users to be able to get out of our cars. We have no way of knowing if there was a disabled person watching her in her car waiting for her to leave so they could park there in order to go into the store. Able bodied people can literally go anywhere, the whole parking lot is yours aside from a few spaces, we unfortunately don’t have that luxury because of curbs/bad terrain/distance and whatever else. Again, her guy shouldn’t have been shot over it, but she shouldn’t have parked there. You defending her parking there because she wasn’t going to be there for long is straight up ableism, and I encourage you to listen to more disabled people on the issue because it’s something we deal with everyday. It’s very frustrating when the one spot we can access isn’t accessible for us because an able bodied person decided to be lazy.
@Amy Mendez for what its worth I agree with you 100% that the response was totally disproportionate.
It was lazy and selfish parking in the disabled bay - especially as there were other spaces. Someone in a wheelchair needs extra space to get out of the car - and they can't get out to knock on the window and ask the person to move. Annoying, but not the end of the world.
In no way whatsoever does it warrant a confrontation like that, and being murdered over it is sickening. I agree it wasn't malicious parking there, it was ignorant - and I should know, I'm paraplegic so I deal with this a lot. I manage just fine without shouting at people and definitely haven't shot anyone.
@Amy Mendez um I know you're Hispanic based on your last name your profile picture and the previous comments you have left...all very easy info to acquire simply by simply checking your public profile.
Same here, especially using the "my store" type of language then picking a fight with the woman when he isn't handicapped or have anyone handicapped in his car. Dude gets pushed over for fucking with his old lady, turns around and shoots dude in the chest without even saying "back up" or "stop or ill shoot" or anything, just sat up and pulled the trigger 🙄 poor guy was even waking away sideways away from him. Shit is overkill and sad because he's got a family too. Never should have gave that guy a weapon or a chance to use it.
I have a guy on my street in town who’s a towny. But he’s cool at least. Wears the same red shorts and T-shirt EVERYDAY! Straightens people garbage cans and sweeps the sidewalks and shit lol
@Accuser_of_the_Brethren yeah, if he really felt threatened i feel like he could've shot his knee or foot at the very least. anywhere below the abdomen is survivable, so is above but its less likely, then again you dont really have time to think in that type of situation. Depends on perspective.
@Chronospa Bro, shooting in the legs is difficult, even more so when you're shooting relatively small targets, like knees and feet, as they're not as big as torso and are moving. Even if you shoot in the legs though, you can shatter bones, pieces of which can rupture the arteries in particular the big femoral artery and good luck recovering from that, you can pass away within minutes. If an ambulance took 90 mins in this video, if what I described above were to happen, the person wouldn't stand a chance. So, my point is, "anywhere below the abdomen is survivable" is not always true. And yes, the situation matters a lot. You simply don't have enough time to think in general, not that this applies to this case
@Dima-X – Gotoro Of course. I didnt mean to say its 100% survivable, but more than not i’d say. Various things could happen like you said, low chance but you could bleed out. And yes, the leg is way harder to hit b, even if he had missed i feel like it would be enough to get him away. Im not sure if he had any intent in killing or not though.
@Chronospa i feel like he could have totally shot his knee or leg and still "neutralized the threat" or whatever he thought was happening. Nope, center mass, kill shot immediately without either of them saying a word. 20 years warranted.
@Accuser_of_the_Brethren Also, notice how he complains that "every day there's a car in the handicap spot "waiting for someone."' Like... maybe it's THEIR store too? Maybe they are there every day to shop, just like he is? But he never considers that, of course. Because he thinks that he's the protagonist & everyone else is a side character or antagonist, only acting in response to him.
I think it's a pretty good defense when you don't have much else to go on - since they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, pointing out that the camera footage isn't super clear is a good thing to bring up. I mean like maybe he was pulling out a banana! We don't know! It was a good effort for a defense team that didn't really have much else to use for their defense. But then the "he's the real victim here! uwu" part just trashed their already not super great defense argument.
@Banjo Peppers thats how I felt watching it. No matter what, every arrow pointed to him. I hate it for both parties but he was in the wrong. In the heat of the moment who knows what he was seeing through his eyes. But the way the defense attorney talked really killed it. The other guy did an incredible job on proving why he was in the wrong though. I would hire him.
@Banjo Peppers thing is, even if the guy that was shot was a straight bar of 5 pixels and Michael was another, you would still clearly see the one bar moving away from the other. The definition of the camera is totally irrelevant, and in my opinion even bringing it up only further weakens their already pathetic defense
The deceased man is lucky he isn't being charged wuth attempted murderer. Michael Drejka was lucky he had a gun in his hand and was able to use it to catch the impact of the bullet the man shot from his belly
The argument was weak, but I'm not sure what else he could have argued after his client said he was scared for his life and the video proved that the victim was retreating, other than casting doubt about the video itself. His tone of voice bugged me, though.. was the jury made up entirely of children?
I think its pretty common actually for arguments used by the defending party to be petty or insignificant like that. Its just a little detail that seeds extra doubt in the prosecution's case. Ideally they would build a wall of little things like this to tilt the jury in their favor, but its pretty hard to do that here. Its a point. The jury probably isn't convinced, similar to you and I, but the man's job is to try and build a defense for his client.
I hate this attitude that he has that he is obligated to approach vehicles, circle them, take photos, and antagonize the passengers about being in a handicap parking spot. He pretends to be a cop and tries to use all of the same lingo to make himself sound intelligent, but in reality he is some guy with a gun looking for trouble and starting trouble where he wants to.
At the same time, parking in handicapped places is a shitty move and the response they offered when confronted is equally shitty. People should call out BS behavior like this, but not with guns.
@Kaylus While I definitely agree that it is shitty to park in handicapped spaces, that is really so far beyond the point. It’s like saying that we should all learn from Breonna Taylor not to date drug dealers. Like, sure, maybe that is good general life advise, but this is a murder, and the relevance of that fact is borderline tangential.
@Kaylus i don't think this was his first time doing this ... He said that he always carried a gun, all his life ... And the fact that he fired the gun after the guy backed up makes me think that he wanted to use his gun eventually, that in his head was something like "okay, this guy pushed me to the ground, i'm justified to shoot him " ... plus, i don't think that if the guy was white and the same thing happened , things would've gone the same way ... but hey, that's just my opinion.
@VeloxFelidae EXACTLY! People are having a hard time getting that people are mad because a guy died over parking in a handicap spot. No one is saying yeah it was ok for them to park there. No one is 100% innocent in this but the consequence is not equal dropping dead in front of your 5 year old child.
That question when they said would you do the same thing if you had a gun switched my mind about the situation... but all n reality the dude made a violence offense ... I do think this guy was looking for trouble.
why is it his business anyways on who parks in handicap spots, he never mentions hes handicapped. thats between the person who needs that spot and the person whos parked in it
@Kaylus Please, don't try to divert blame. Nobody ever denied that stealing handicapped parking spaces is wrong, but it is ignorant at best and outright malicious at worst to act like that is anywhere NEAR the plane of murder.
I'm disabled and I really appreciate people who put idiots who park in the handicap spots in their place. Especially since there was clearly other free parking spots in this case.
@Kaylus No, no they shouldn't call out this behavior. They should anonymously report them and that's it. Anything else is crossing a line. Confrontation is entirely unnecessary in this situation.
Oddly enough, I've watched this one before. I'm now on my second watch through, and I realized how his "sling" evolved from him just holding his arm funny to using his shirt as a sling like that. It's interesting to see how he was trying his hardest to look like a victim in all this.
I'm wondering why did he need an arm sling? Arm sling is for either to reduce the blood flow to the forearm when there is a cut or stitch, or when an arm is dislocated in order to keep it back in place 😄
@Kendra Baird Remembering he entered the room cuffed from behind..so could the handcuffs caused his injury or maybe the toilet lid in the restroom as thats when he began using his shirt as a sling, on his return..or maybe..
@Kendra Baird Remembering he entered the room cuffed from behind..so could the handcuffs caused his injury or maybe the toilet lid in the restroom as thats when he began using his shirt as a sling, on his return..or maybe..
@John Reynolds for verbally harassing his FEMALE partner in front of their children. If I was a man, I would’ve done the same exact thing to protect my woman and children.
I think he was so sure that he was justified in his actions, that it never crossed his mind that he could get into trouble.
107 likes
George Taylor2020-07-01 02:41:28 (edited 2020-07-01 03:30:12 )
Kinda funny though isn't it? Like there's an entire field of experts who spend years if not decades studying and practicing law precisely for situations like this. They're such a fundamentally important profession in our country that 1) They can't even ask you any questions until they've told you that you have a right to a lawyer, and 2) THEY'LL FUCKING GIVE YOU ONE FOR FREE IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD IT. We go out of our way to show people how important lawyers are...
And yet time and time again these guilty people waive their right to a lawyer thinking they're actually smart, or cunning enough to save their own ass better than an ass-saving expert could lol 🤦♂️. This guy is what happens when you're so ignorant about a subject that you don't even realize that you're totally out of your depth. Let the experts work in their areas of expertise people. I promise you, you aren't qualified to do their job.
@Ella Walsh A police officers job is to make evidence stick to the suspect, whether that suspect is actually innocent they don't know. Always assume if you are arrested innocent or not that you are in a bad place and need to lawyer up and shut your mouth.
@EliasDanger Not true. There are many cops, judges and even lawyers themselves who commit horrible crimes like murder and rape. The serial killer with the highest body count in history is a doctor in the UK called Harold Shipman. He murdered at least 218 people. You have to be reasonably smart to be a doctor.
I think most people's first reaction is "I want to get out of here ASAP, a lawyer is just going to make this drag on and on." But never say a word to law enforcement until you've spoken to a lawyer/solicitor no matter how long it takes or what you have or haven't done.
@George Taylor True. And the thing is, laws are constantly changing, being revised, etc., common people cannot keep up with the changes because they are not in the field dealing with them every day of their lives. Our justice system right now is so complicated, even lawyers have a tough time keeping up! You re right, let the lawyers do the job for you, you'll be glad you did. 🙄
honestly a lawyer could get u out of alot of shit weather u are in the right or in the wrong
3 likes
Jo Letty2020-07-08 03:51:23 (edited 2020-07-08 06:59:21 )
Okay, I agree, but this advice should NOT be impressed on the guilty criminals. Too many get off Scott free for horrible, horrible Crimes! With so many laws protecting the wrongdoers and the lenient punisment they hand out, now, that is a crime!!! Too many innocent victims go without justice being done them because lawyers defend them right and left. 🤔😐😤😒
@Jo Letty they are doing their job. over 90% take a plea deal in that their lawyer convinces them to just plead guilty. its on prosecutors to convince the jury in other cases. if they cant do that, they must go free. its not always perfect, in fact i would say the bigger problem is innocent people being convinced to plead guilty cuz they are afraid they will lose the case and get a harsher sentence.
Listening to his defense attorney rambling about the "wrong colors" and "standard definition" in the CCTV footage makes me want to disagree with you ;) :D
@Hostile At Heart you cant blame him for trying, you could only blame the jury for believing it or the prosecutor for not doing a good job of pointing out how ridiculous of an argument that is.
Occasionally they say at the end of the video they say "I think I need a lawyer". Cops are thinking dude you needed a lawyer an hour ago it's too late now.
VinnieThePuuh individual psychological structures can result in a person doing evil things, knowing how evil those things are and enjoying them thus making that person evil. The psychological structures don’t force someone to commit evil acts. It’s their own evil choices. We aren’t just bags of meat that do what our paychological structures and circumstances dictate. If that was the case, our whole justice system is misguided. Punishment for crimes doesn’t make sense, as they are no ones fault.
@Tom Britton probably right, but with proper education and advice most would realize a lawyer would prevent much interrogation from happening. a lawyer will provide the angle the police are taking before you can sabotage it intentionally or unintentionally. we are the first to look at the guy in NCIS who says, "i want my lawyer" as a guilty guy with everything to hide, rather than a man being snatched up by the legal system on circumstantial evidence.
@EliasDanger Sometimes a good person do a crime too, yes the bad people most likely who will do it but accidents happen or a person has a psychological problem or losing your temper and do a stupid act
B24 Liberator He didn’t care that he killed someone and he would have absolutely gotten time no matter what he said..the video of the murder said it all
@George Taylor I agree 100% but I can tell you that at least on smaller cases, it can be hard to resist when it's something like DUI or drug possession and you know they have you but the best advice is "make them work for it" meaning don't consent to FST's (in PA, YMMV), don't consent to car searches, don't consent to blood draws. the problem is, I know around here at least that if you cooperate and just give in to everything and give them all the evidence they need, they often let you go home/get picked up by someone and at 2am on a Friday evening (which could mean several days before you see a judge) that just seems like such a better option than making the cops work for it because if they do then they are almost always going to book you jnto jail and tack on every charge possible before. cooperating with an officer for small misdemeanor infractions does actually get you cut some slack with the cops sometimes with the charges. and then if you cant afford a private attorney, its a toss up if you're going to get a PD who is willing to go through all tje discovery and try to find loopholes to get evidence dismissed and if the cops did eberhthjng right, constitutionally, you dont get off and the cop and rhe prosecutor might be less lenient with your plea deal. its fucked up and not how the law is supposed to work but it haopens every day, all the time and its really easy to talk about standing up for your rights and can be much harder to do the right thjng in the actual moment.
now, a murder charge or any felony really? or really any time they bring you into an interrogation room, i would hope that i have seen so many cases of false confessions and/or self incrimination that the only phrase out of my mouth would be "get me a lawyer now please" but I can see why and how people get themselves into these situations even though they were JUST reminded of their rights. my experience is just with roadside misdemeanor drug offense arrests. I csnt imagine how much more stressful these situations are, especially wirh seasoned detectives using the Reid method
The only time I was booked was because I plead the fifth when four other folks that I was with sang like birds... I was a college freshman busted by campus police for a super petty weed and simple paraphernalia possession charge (less than a g, and a $5 glass pipe found in a backpack within arms reach of my person’s inside the driver’s vehicle ((I was sitting in the seat directly behind the driver)).
The four folks who gabbed got tickets, a proper court date, and released from the scene back to their dorms. Cop said that I gave him a hard time simply by stating that “I don’t speak to police”, and that he took me to jail that night on account of my disrespect, (aka not incriminating myself by pleading the 5th)...
Matter of fact, I was very respectful and did nothing but comply to his orders (other than when he was asking me any incriminating questions which were politely refused).
Needless to say, I spent 8 hours in an East Knox holding cell between some dude with face tattoos who got caught trafficking a shit-ton o’ cocaine from Atlanta up north and another kid about my age who got called in for beatin’ his lady. They were nice in a “oh I fucked up tonight” kinda way. The coke dude was little wide-eyed and the lady-beater was a charismatic sketchy lowlife, which was disturbing... I trusted neither, and for the eight hours I was with them, I was on edge... but for that moment they were both still nice to a fellow accused criminal.
After 8 hours, I was released on my on recognizance and had a court date which ended in a plea deal. No probation or anything crazy. Shit got expunged after a year. Never had been in trouble before and since then...
Oh and little fun tie bit, the cops started to make fun of me when they emptied my backpack at the station and found my choir book for men’s chorale. Fml.
They do not read your rights to you during basic questioning. However, they do for an interrogation. Correct me if I am wrong, but that is what I have gathered from the countless hours of crime videos that I have watched.😅 It was not something that I knew before and I doubt many others know it either. (Besides us crime addicts.)🤣
I know right U would think ppl would have enough sense to exercise their 5th amendment privilege IMO why Casey Anthony walked herself out from facing the death penalty.
@EliasDanger We'll agree to disagree.Ur right she talked alot of BS but never did incriminate herself Argue this case w good attorneys Sad to say they got it right Chaney Mason's handiwork Jose didn't have the experience Just the hustle to get great legal minds behind him Everybody in the world knows she's quilty But the law worked for her Reasonable doubt. Personally I'd rather one walk than an innocent person be incarcerated
Harper Mac dude, she was covering up and lying for something and her car smelled like death and she led the detectives on wild goose chases...I think there was a bunch of other stuff too. It was obvious. I woulda convicted her easy
@EliasDanger I have to disagree. I know a lot of people from a lot of different walks, and I've seen very intelligent people do very stupid things. Smart people get desperate, and then they commit crimes because they feel they have no other option and sometimes they didn't. No one is going to help them, they have kids to feed, they are carrying the weight of the world. In this case and in many a stupid man did something stupid and spoke before thinking. Because that's what stupid people do. They're too dumb to fathom all of the potential consequences of what they are saying or doing. Just don't assume all criminals are stupid is all 😊 I have never been arrested but I've watched a lot of good people do terrible things in my life and it just takes a little thought and empathy to realize why. We are all a few missed meals or a few losses away from being the people we judge.
It's people like him who have enough balls to think there's no way they could be proved wrong. Narcissistic, aggressive, chip on their shoulder people.
GUYS NO ONE WHOS BEEN UNDER ARREST WOULD MAKE THIS DUMB COMMENT. I swear its like you guys think they’re like, “ok love bug, lawyer will be here in ten. Here’s a crumpet while you wait.” Now this guy had the right to leave. He’s an idiot. He should have left, if nothing else. Bc he wasn’t under arrest... But generally speaking... If you dont have a lawyer on retainer (WHO DOES? What are you tony Montana?) you have to wait and be transferred to county UNLESS you can get someone to send a paid lawyer over. LAWYERS DONT KNOW OR CARE ABOUT YOU. If you get arrested on Friday night, do you think theyre coming in on Saturday morning LOL? if you dont have someone to send them money, do you think they’re coming? NO. And the public defenders, again, are at county, at the courthouse... meaning you have to voluntarily wait to be transferred. When innocent, thats even harder, but when guilty its even harder bc you already fear staying in jail... When youre under arrest, all you want to do is leave, and they fuck with you BIG TIME.
You guys are thinking of interrogation. If youre being interrogated, turn on your heel and leave and come back with a lawyer, but if youre under arrest, unless youre like a murderer and think you cn get off with a lawyer... no one waits for a lawyer. Like I’m staying in jail three days to wait for an interrogation for a minor possession charge or something? Never. You THINK you would do that bc youre calm in your bed. Talk to me after you’ve been strip searched and handcuffed to a bench for three hours. Anyone would crack before the lawyer got there. Also, not in this case, but 8/10 times when you get arrested youre drunk or high, people forget that too. I’m talking about small crimes people in this common section are more likely to be accused of. This guy is so convinced the cops will take his side that hes falling for all the tricks they play on him. He didnt wait for a lawyer bc he thought he’d be home for supper. And thats what everyone thinks. It’s very hard to willingly stay in jail longer to wait for a lawyer, even if you’d likely end up there anyway....
All I’m saying is, if you’ve been under arrest.... you wouldnt say it. Not even if you HAD waited for a lawyer, bc you’d understand.
In my opinion, it’s a GREAT thing that criminals like this don’t immediately call for a lawyer. Go ahead and dig yourself into a worse situation so you can be justifiably arrested - you know?
I’m sorry but that’s way too long. You’d be annoyed if they took that long with a broken leg let alone a bullet in the chest. Poor guy. No one deserves to go out like that.
only so much they can do there’s so many people who call them daily, I’m currently working towards that profession to hopefully help reduce that problem
They have to arrive a little later because they have to make sure the scene is clear and safe. Can't be too sure that whatever shooter wouldn't open fire on them
There can be reasons for it. I was a 911 dispatcher for a few years, and my husband has been a paramedic since forever.. We’ve both worked for cities and rural communities, both have times where EMS can take a while to make scene. Either they did not have any available ambulances and had to request mutual aid, they could have been fairly rural, or could have been staging for scene safety. Our goal was to have EMS dispatched within 30 seconds of receiving a call, have EMS en-route within 1 minute from dispatch. It didn’t always happen that fast, but there are a few reasons why EMS may take 19 minutes to arrive on a scene and that’s why it’s important that you know basic skills like cpr and how to help stop bleeding, it could save someones life.
It's unfortunate that anyone loses their life, but you really need to understand emergent medicine and the strains on it in today's environment. Patient location, Current location of emergent providers (enroute to another call or transporting a patient), dispatching time, asking another Municipality for back up etc.. it's overwhelming with so many baby boomers at the age they are and the shortages in funding for the municipal emergency providers to the point they subcontract the work to privatized ambulance companies to cut the costs on pension/health care/vehicle costs. The cure is instead of complaining, do something within your community to help ensure this doesn't happening to you or yours. BTW, scene safety is a priority when there's a violent crime and the scene isn't secured(perpetrator isn't in custody, explosive devices haven't been located etc..), then the medics are not obligated to assist the patient since it's redundant to try to help someone when your own life could be jeopardized. I've had people in the worst neighborhoods throw empty glass bottles at the ambulance to get us to stop... .then they'll try to either steal/car jack the onboard medications or the entire ambulance itself because their momentary emotional decision felt better than the rational long term repercussions.
@Keila Myles as an EMT, your expectations for our ETA is ridiculous. We literally cannot teleport on scene, and we have to make sure the scene is secure before even setting foot on the premises. Especially when a firearm is involved.
Dude our agencies don’t even like us going more than 10mph over the speed limit. How is that the medic’s fault? Plus the police typically have to give us the go-ahead to get on site when guns are involved. I’ve been shot at while staging for a SWAT team, and that day I learned my lesson about how far back I want to be before the scene is clear. Point is, there are protocols to keep us safe. Can’t do much for people if we’re dead.
english is not my first language so i umderstood 90 minutes instead of 19 and i thought that was a crazy amount of time, but now that i know that it was 19 minutes it is still a lot of time
@sweet paulaina it really isn’t. If someone there kept pressure on the wound, depending on where he was shot, to keep him from bleeding out, it might’ve had a different outcome. 20 minutes to arrive on scene after a shooting is standard to make sure the area is safe for the medics and EMTs to enter. And you have to take into account traffic on the way there. So, say you’re held up 10 minutes from traffic, even with lights and sirens. Then you still have to make sure you’re not walking into something potentially dangerous. Our first priority is making sure we go home at the end of the day. I don’t care what people have to say about that, but we are not law enforcement.
@A J Well somethings gotta give...maybe I’m wrong for blaming y’all if y’all have to wait on police to give y’all the “go” but it is what it is...and 19 minutes seems like too long of a time regardless of whose to blame so forgive me not knowing protocol...it still sucks, I said what I said...but I know better now
I have to be honest, I thought the video said "90 minutes" and I was like "90 MINUTES???" Now that I've read your comment, I can understand a little better. I'm extremely sorry for the guy, no doubt at all, but I don't think there was malicious intent with arriving 19 minutes later. The causes can be many, like the fact that they have few ambulances and/or operators, or the station was far from the place where it happened and there was a lot of traffic. I don't know, honestly. I pray for the poor man who died and for his family....
(Edit: I'm Italian, that's why I didn't understand the right thing at first. And my brother is a volunteer paramedic here in Italy, so I kinda know how it works arous here. So before people start blaming paramedics, they should ask themselves "do I donate to their associations so that they can have enough and adequate material to do their job? (If the the association is independent from the govt) and would i be willing to be a volunteer like them, doing this FOR FREE, putting my own life on the line?" Again, I'm not American and I don't know how it works over there, nor I know if your paramedics are volunteers like here in Italy, but if they are, AT LEAST show some respect for them. Show it even if they are paid. They're doing an important job AND trying to get their own skins home in the meanwhile. Try to be more understanding, they didn't get on the site 2 hours later.)
@GauntletTCF it’s very similar over here. There are some days where I’ll have a call 45 minutes away because that region is so backed up with calls. Some days it’s just a mess.
@B Sheppard ahja genau. You can just tell me that in English cause that was just harder to understand 😂. Im guessing you were trying to tell me that the black dude got what he deserved for pushing the guy?
@A J I totally get you. My town's paramedic association only has only 2 ambulances and they often have to operate in the nearby towns too because some towns don't have them at all, or they have even smaller associations with maybe even only one ambulance, and if more than 1 case happens, they are in trouble and need to call for backup from other places.
Nex Wex 3 You wouldn’t protect your woman from a man confronting her while she sits in the car? My man would, no questions asked. He could see there was an altercation going on.
I live in Clearwater (where this happened). People will legit ignore emergency vehicles and not move out of the way. I see it all the time. It’s heartbreaking.
@A J The hospital is like maybe 5 minutes away from that store. People do not give a crap about emergency vehicles here. They just ignore them and don’t move. It’s heartbreaking.
@Josh Gee right, so your government would have medics run in without law enforcement clearing the scene after shots are fired? You realize we’re not cops, right? Not allowed to be armed. Read the comments above, please.
Right because no one else in the city needed an ambulance, heavy traffic does slow things down, some people won't even move for one, maybe it was coming from cross town. I had my horse roll on me knocking me out, took a good 10 minutes for the ambulance to arrive and the hospital is a mere 15 minute walk. I see what you are implying and its disgusting.
Scene has to be secured by law enforcement before ems will respond in, so that adds time to the response. Some rural areas do have lengthy response times, where I live in Alaska the outlying areas can take 30 minutes
@Keinlieb how in the world is a push comparable to literally firing a gun at someone with intent to hurt/kill? The difference is that the defendant went there looking for trouble. He started and intense argument with a woman who was minding her business, of course her partner is going to come out and tell the guy to get lost. Saying "violence begets violence" in a situation like this is incredibly tone deaf.
@A J I don’t doubt that, but every place I’ve lived departments have never been that busy, places are definitely different, but smaller town departments definitely aren’t an every 10 minutes department, or even every hour.
Have you had any experience with traffic in pinellas county, florida? It's a madhouse. People dont even bother to pull over for emergency vehicles most of the time, and they're forced to slowly weave in and out of traffic.
I was involved in a hit and run broke my ankle and couldnt move, it was raining and I was on the side of the road wet, cold and in a lot pain. It took paramedics 3 hours to arrive, 19 minuets is extremely fast.
1. scene must be safe and cops have people specifically trained in EMS to go in with the team clearing the scene to start any immediate care. By the looks of the background and scene the area it happened in can be a very remote area. They try to keep emergency services within a few minutes of any given resident but when you have a small town in large (by area) states theres people that live 30+ minutes away from anything but trees and wild life so these little gas stations and mini marts open to be closer to them but not near the center of town where the emergency services are. Those two factors come into play. The you add traffic and weather
Omg it’s painful 😂🤦♀️the cop asks him the same question like 10 diff ways, only thing left for him to say was “ OK we will do this multiple choice - did you A- feel your life was in danger B- afraid you were gonna die or C- both ?? 😂
Can we all agree that if the man wasn't black this 99% would't have happened? He said he is not racist, but in that moment he was 100% . Mabye not actively racist but in that moment damn sure the thought " he is black so he wants to kill me" .
@Nyx Not so sure. Did he say "He is black so he wants to kill me."? It came up in investigations that he was involved in four previous incidents of aggression. What were the racial types of the others involved in those? The way I see it, he didn't have to say anything about the car being parked in the Handicapped zone. The deceased victim didn't have to shove him to the ground and Drejka didn't have to shoot his gun. At each point of the whole episode, the two men escalated to unnecessary levels and the actual issue was left far behind. Drejka was absolutely wrong in shooting him. It was not necessary at all and his conviction, based on past incidents and the testimony and footage of this one, is justified.
@Jdb i am not ...but in my country people with dark skin are always perceived as "more dangerous and unpredictable" and i really hate that. Racism feels pretty illegal there in america but here is "acceptable", it should be but well... And i do see white people always throwing blame on the dark ones
@Nyx But you have to stick to the facts of a case. Yes, you have seen/witnessed/been a victim of racial prejudice in your own country, but there is no evidence that the above clip contained anything provoked by racial prejudice. If you are going to claim that about the white guy, the same useless surmising could be made about the black guy.
0 likes
Larry Chunk2020-12-28 05:57:03 (edited 2020-12-28 06:01:00 )
@Nyx If the guy wasn't black he probably wouldn't have shoved the dude.
Black guys have aggression issues. Imagine if that dead idiot was an Asian guy - he would probably have parked in the right spot thus avoiding the whole issue. And even if he did park in the wrong spot an Asian dude surely wouldn't shove the guy down.
Black guy, though? Yup - lawbreaking and physical aggression. "HE ONLY SHOT HIM CAUSE HE'S BLACK!" 🙄🙄🙄
Lol I was looking for this comment! He makes a point of letting the detectives know his arm is hurt. They leave for so long he sets it on the table like nothing but when They come in catch him off guard and starts faking it again
@SeEpiN ur joking right? You think having a hole in ur chest or worse stomach isn't painful. U should search up getting shot in the belly button, one of the most painful things one can experience. Also it doesn't feel nice feeling ur organs slowly failing and the bleeding out.
SwissJoker Hi from what I understand , this Guy lived in his neighborhood and would on a consistent basis Would Hassled people on a daily basis about parking in the handicap spot , even the owner of store was aware of what he was doing. He knew there was a chance of confrontation when he would approach these people without a handicap emblem...
That’s not what it was about lol it started as that, but then it escalated to a physical altercation; which is what the shooting was about. Obviously lol
Howard Manley Indeed but I dont think that justified the guy just shoving him to the floor.... Thats why this is even a close case and self defense is a viable defense strategy
Howard Manley well I don’t believe he approached her looking to shoot somebody. I think he was trying to play cop in a situation that was that big of a deal to begin with. I know people like him. My brother used to be like him. We worked at Burger King together and everyone hated him because he would try to tell everyone how to do their job and stuff. He wasn’t a manager. He was in no position to beaming demands of the employees. This guy is similar. He believes he’s morally superior, so he feels that it’s necessary for him to address when people are breaking the law. It’s not his job, he’s not helping the cops out, he just does it. I agree that he was aware that it could cause a confrontation. But he wasn’t afraid because he had his gun on him. I think he should have been charged with 2nd degree murder instead of manslaughter, but I definitely don’t think he did it simply to cause a scene or start an altercation. He did it because he had an authority complex like he’s morally superior to everyone else. Like it’s his job to make sure people are following the law. It’s equally dumb of him, but I don’t think he was looking for trouble. He would have felt perfectly happy and accomplished if she said, “I’m sorry, I’ll em my vehicle as soon as my husband gets back with the keys.” I didn’t think he would have continued to push the issue.
Tyler Grant vThanks Tyler ur explanation makes sense in some kind of odd way, I personally don’t have that kind of personality so it’s hard for me to relate. I do know the store owner told him time and time again not to do what he was doing, however I guess he couldn’t help himself like you said it was just his style do you want to tell people how to act. I think ur talking points was right on tho. Be blessed ...Howie <><
@SwissJoker Yes indeed. The significant delay in point and shoot is what would have made me vote guilty... I didn't notice the decedent retreating at first presentation.. So I believe the defendant thinking that wasn't happening. I think manslaughter was an appropriate charge... I think asking for the max sentence was over the top... mitigating circumstance of having been violently assaulted without warning should be taken into account.
@Tyler Grant Is someone in his family handicapped? I'm curious if there was some other personal motivation. But yeah as you say he may just be one of those busy bodies.
When I was a kid I liked reading science books. One time I read a book about snakes and it said baby snakes were actually the most dangerous. Baby snakes don't have the skill or control of their venom glands that an adult has. As a result a young snake might inject you with all their venom in a single bite rather than giving a small dose. That's what this guy is. An inexperienced baby.
Baby snake actually do have control of their venom release. The reason they tend to inject all their venom is because they don't have the body mass, speed or stamina of adults during confrontation (whether hunting or defending themself) so they make sure that their bite is lethal as quickly as possible.
@Dudeno. That's not the case. After he showed the gun the black guy was trying to get away. Just watch the footage again.
Maybe you are right and the black guy would have beaten him up if he had not pulled out the gun. I give you that. But there was NO need to shoot the weapon at a person that is clearly retreating.
Honestly I’ve been in a situation where while at a indoor play area I saw my 2yr old daughter was being pinned against the wall and being yelled at by a much older boy probably 9yrs old. I can’t explain it or really remember but all I know is I must of run across the area and shoved the boy down. I don’t even remember running or anything I just remember coming out of a fog and after seeing my baby was okay realizing I just pushed a kid down. He wasn’t hurt and thankfully no one saw lol but I was in shock that I did that. I learned that day what momma bear means. I think that might be what this man experienced when he walked out of the store and saw a man yelling at his wife with his child in the car.
@Ana R if he was concerned about his kids safety he wouldnt start a fight in front of them especially in a gun friendly state like florida. he technically threw the first punch. he was being a thug. he even hesitated before he pushed him. quite different than your incident. he didnt deserve to get shot though
@Antonio man lol maybe, still open carrying requires a lot of restraint. I think most people after shooting someone even if they were attacked, if they are a civilian and not use to kill or be killed of say war. Killing someone would affect them you know.
There’s a whole thread on Reddit of people who have killed someone legally, a lot of them have admitted their own shame in feeling nothing at all afterwards, so it’s not necessarily an admission of being guilt to be this nonchalant. Having said that though this guy is guilty, the other dude didn’t advance once the weapon was drawn and he made no attempt to tell him to back off, he just fired.
@Antonio man Look where being 'hard' got this dude. The dude so 'hard' he had never got in a fight and only had the balls to confront people because of his gun.
Nobody should be expected to feel traumatized after shooting an aggressive animal that physically attacks you without provocation. I would have felt proud of being able to protect myself.
Yes, show some empathy for another human being, especially when the man had his family with him. Terrible thing to do and an awful waste, for parking in a handicap space!!!???
@Derk you can say the same thing about the guy trying to yell at a woman with a kid not considering she may have a big husband coming around the corner. he picked the wrong woman to try to scare and feel manly about it
The detective kept grabbing his arm where he said it was hurting. The detective was intentionally grabbing him, Which would have made it hurt. Prompting him to tell the detective to stop grabbing his arm. Feigning sympathy while grabbing his hurt arm to cause pain, is often a technique of psychopaths and cops.
He basically said because he always carries a gun, he had the safe feeling that he could confront people in this way. So hes basically prepared to shoot someone at any time if he perceives a threat, whether logical or not.
And it's the exact other way around. If you're carrying a gun (which I encourage), you're now responsible for the gun you carry, and whatever comes out of it, always. You should always try to de-escalate, but if you're armed, you have a double duty to not get into stupid arguments, and de-escalate situations. Just as you have a duty to not drink, for example (while carrying the gun, if you're gonna go out drinking, leave the car and the gun at home). It's also your duty to protect your gun, if somebody takes your gun from you, be it a kid because you left it unprotected, or a criminal. You're responsible for keeping it secure.
A gun brings new responsibilities. This guy, instead of responsibilities, thought "I can do whatever I want, because I have a gun".
Did he have pepper spray on him? You don't want the only defense tool you have to be a deadly weapon with nothing in between. Had the guy backing up still been a threat in his mind then mace him and thats that. Even if you were deemed to not be in the danger you thought those kids still have their Dad and you're facing prob at most simple assault and likely no charges as dude did push him. Have some mace in addition if you choose to carry a firearm. Would have saved multiple lives including the kids and the moms who don't have their Dad now. Lose lose lose all the way through.
The detectives gave him every chance to say he felt his life was in danger. This kind of situation scares the $hit out of me! My man would have done the same thing if he came out of the store and saw some guy in my face. This guy only felt brave enough to provoke this situation because he carried a gun. He is not the victim. He is a coward! My opinion!
SHE"S SAYING HER BOYFRIEND WOULD HAVE DONE WHAT MARKIES DID, WHICH WAS ABSOLUTELY THE WRONG THING. HAD HE NOT GOT KILLED HE'D HAVE BEEN GUILTY OF ASSAULT. DREDJA NEVER RAISED A HAND TO HIM WHEN MARKEIS SHOVED HIM DOWN. BEING AN ASSHOLE ISNT GROUNDS FOR ASSAULT. HIS WIFE ALSO SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN THE CAR, SHE"S ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR ESCALTING THE SITUATION - ALTHO DREDJKA STILL HAD NO RIGHT TO SHOOT HIM... HE COULD HAVE JUST GOT A PLATE AND CALLED THE COPS... OR IF MARKEIS CAME AT HIM, BACKED MARKEIS OFF WITH THE GUN WITHOUT KILLING HIM. NOW HAD DJEDKA BEEN HANDICAPPED, AND MARKEIS CAME AT HIM AGAIN, HE LIKELY WOULD HAVE HAD GROUNDS... OR HAD HE CLAIMED HE WAS IN FEAR FOR HIS LIFE HE"D HAVE HAD A BETTER CASE, BUT YA CANT BRING A GUN TO A FIST FIGHT WHEN YOU'RE PHYSICALLY CAPABLE. THESE STAND YOU GROUND LAWS ARE CRAZY< PEOPLE THINK THEY CAN JUST SHOOT SOMEONE WITHOUT MEETING THE CRITERIA.
You don't get to tackle someone just because they are yelling at your wife. Of course he shouldn't have been killed for it and it's good they found Michael guilty. But if you think getting physical with someone because they are trash talking is OK then I'm sorry you weren't raised right.
Exactly. Fools like him are emboldened by carrying a gun, and have a chip on their shoulder, just daring someone to knock it off, so they have an excuse to shoot. It had nothing to do with self-defense. He was the aggressor.
1 like
L Her2021-08-03 12:37:15 (edited 2021-08-03 12:53:29 )
@David I never said that the boyfriend was right for charging at Michael, although I wouldn't blame him for doing so because Michael shouldn't be instigating people in the first place. I was simply saying that the one post was pointing that the boyfriend was deserving of what he got (which he absolutely did not). If saying that triggered you then you probably should get some help as you may likely be one of Michael's kind and end up shooting someone unnecessarily and unlawfully.
They parked illegally. He confronted them about it, which was probably a bit much, but understandable. Victim walks out and pushes him hard, which was a big overreaction. He pulls out his gun and shoots which is indefensible.
@Youssef Elhenawy I don't believe he did. The dude is sick. He seems to not care at all. Even in prison he's probably still saying that he's in there for no reason. Some BS like that
@J K Why you gotta bring race into this? Maybe he had a family member who's disabled and is tired of people taking the parking spot? Maybe he works for a parking firm and deals with this often, etc. etc. Could be a thousand reasons. You really can't break a law and complain that it's enforced or that people complain about it when you do.
The thing with carrying a weapon is, that it's not always a security measure but just dialing up the degree of violence. If a criminal knows that victims might carry a gun, they're more likely to take one as well. If guns are involved, they're more likely to get used. And you probably won't get to pull a weapon if a criminal has a gun themselves. Unless you have some time to prepare for an attack.
12 likes
John Costa2019-10-09 21:24:26 (edited 2019-10-09 21:25:00 )
GUYS!! I'm pro gun, including concealed carry. And secondly I have been attacked and nearly killed, from behind and if I was carrying a gun he would have killed me with it he actually got exhausted trying to crack my head open with his Nikes and gave up. I'm just saying THIS INDIVIDUAL rings true to me as a guy just waiting to kill someone. That's all.
@1onefix1 when someone is on a video like this defending the shooter, yes you should shame them. No one said all gun owners, no one said any generalizations, but this guy mustered up a whole braindead rant that isn't even related to the situation.
A lot of comments here are basically the comments that the rest of the world will never agree with. The "America needs more guns" mindset is utterly baffling.
@Reb el Do you have any basis for this? From what I know with researchers interviewing prisoners, criminals in general will avoid potential victims if they think they may be carrying a weapon.
If what he said in the interrogation was true then he's been conceal carrying for 26 years and apparently has gotten into some kind of traffic altercations with 4 people before this incident. If he was really looking to use the gun trying to be a hero he sure waited a long time to do it.
@Long Bong He has a point though, you cannot under any circumstances count on the Police to show up, protect you and save the day. It just doesn't happen, it takes minutes at best for the Police to arrive when seconds of your life are at stake.
Here's a comforting thought...we have hundreds of cops with the same attitude. Giving people like this a firearm is like giving a 6 year a brand new bicycle and telling them they can't ride it.
@Long Bong Ok, and statistically it's unlikely for my house to burn down considering what I cook and how much I cook. Does that mean I shouldn't have a fire extinguisher? The point of having it is to remove the worry. Especially for people in bad neighborhoods where those types of things ARE a common occurrence.
Which, according to the actual statistics from the US Department of Justice, there are about 1 million burglaries every year where a member of the household is present. There are 128 million households in the US. So just base numbers here... there's a 1 in 128 chance your house will be robbed while you're home, which isn't exactly a safe situation to be in.
@Long Bong I'm going to repeat what you said. Reading comprehension. I didn't mention gun control. I'm only talking about that preparing for a technically unlikely but still very possible situation, is perfectly fine. You sound like a complete fudd. People aren't constantly worried, it's just they prepare. Not that hard to understand. And it's not as unlikely and you're making it out to be. The statistics show that.
@Borkborknomnom 9000 0.78125%. That's a 0.78125% chance with your own cherry picked statistic. Sounds like i'm hitting close to home for you. I'm sorry you're scared all the time dude, maybe try less Fox news?
@Long Bong That's a .78% chance, in a year. This isn't a cherry picked statistic. One of the main reasons people own firearms for home defense. Home invasions are incredibly common. And self defense uses of firearms is fairly common too. According to a CDC study done during the Obama administration, the lowest estimate was 60-150 thousand self defense uses a year.
If we're going to use your argument, well why lock our doors? Why teach our kids not to follow strangers? Why wear seat belts? Follow the rules of the road and the chance you'll be injured or worse in an accident isn't really much higher. Wearing a seat belt doesn't make someone scared. It's just called being prepared for a possible reality. Now, if the subject was preppers with hundreds of guns and hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammo, you'd have a point. But we aren't talking about those people, we're talking about the average gun owner who owns a gun for self defense. And even if some people do own guns because they're scared something might happen to them or their family, so what? If I lived in the worst block in Flint Michigan, and there are gunshots just about every night right outside my door, I'd be scared for my family. I pity you if you wouldn't feel the same.
I don’t think so. I think he thought it was a good idea, but he was weak and afraid when a confrontation actually happened. This is exactly what makes out of shape and afraid cops dangerous. They don’t “want” to shoot anyone, but they as so afraid they resort to deadly force quickly.
This guy couldn't wait to pop somebody. These types of guys go to bed at night just dreaming about shooting "bag guys", but are actually the bad guys themselves.
@moshtito my understanding is that the guy who had the gun confronted the other guy inside the the store before the incident. I could be wrong though. Either way, don't start fights if you're not prepared to deal with a crazy guy with a gun
@moshtito He pushed the guy for screaming bloody murder at his wife and getting close to the car. This isn't a justification whatsoever, not for the shots fired during that whole event.
It's also worth noting that Drejka had a concealed carry license. The gun wasn't visible - it wasn't SUPPOSED to be visible. If it were, perhaps McGlockton wouldn't have pushed him, but even then, you never expect to get shot over a parking space. And no one should have to.
@Andrew Francis it's not that funny, because that's exactly what happened... that same guy had been part of multiple incidents before that thankfully didn't escalate to the level of this.
@Yoyi Yoyo someone pushing you onto the ground over a parking dispute is in no way an excuse to pull a gun under any circumstances, regardless of how the gun is going to be used.
@auto144p He started a fight. That is what happens when you shove somebody. He could have just as easily walked to his car rather than shoving the guy....
@AlmedinG maybe he was more sane previously. People don't become hungry to shoot over night. It's a process. Just like very few people with gambling and alcohol addictions don't just become addicted overnight.
I work at a gun store and, yes, you’re right. I see these kinds of people all the time. It’s so disappointing to hear them try to deny their wishing of being put into a self defense situation, while waxing about their ability or capacity to “do what they gotta do”. I’m sure this type of case is much, much too common.
Yup, got that impression too. The way he thinks he knows how to talk to the cop's on a technical level, the way he seems to know the intricate details of fire arm self defense. The previous 3 events with road rage incidences with him drawing his gun. This guy in my opinion was just looking for altercations to get into and trying to provoke the other person into a response that he thought would justify him discharging his firearm. Ironically and without realising it, I think Markeis was the one standing up to the loud mouth bully that day, not Durkeri.
@Justin Holmes Markeis may have made the first physical move, but Drejka started the altercation. If some guy started screaming in my wife/partners face I would have probably done more than shove him. Let's face it, that's why he screamed at his wife, he knew it'd get the bigger reaction, its a male pride/spouse defense thing and most of us know it. You can't provoke someone deliberately then claim self defense when it escalates and a bullet isn't the next level response to being pushed. Regardless, Drejka pulled his gun and Markeis backed up, if he'd stepped towards him again then things might be a little 'greyer' but if you shoot someone who's backing down, your f@&ked.
I do believe he was looking for trouble. And while I also believe this was definitely murder, her boyfriend absolutely should not have pushed him, or at least not that hard.
It doesn’t matter what this guy says, to your girl or in front of your girl. Until physical threat is displayed, you cannot lay hands on someone. He should’ve practiced some self-control. Just walk away, direct your woman and kids back in the car; let the moron who’s looking for trouble, find the trouble somewhere else.
Just because someone else is in the wrong, doesn’t mean it’s up to you to make it right. Because sometimes making it right, will cost you something.
@TTV_MrJack People die from getting shoved dude, If you hit your head wrong its lights out, game over. A violent thug creature attacked him from behind. He got what was coming to him.
not from us, but i love to see trials and stuff, and i know usa have harsh sentences ( max here is 25 for the worst crime), but 20 for this in the usa context i think its not "many" ( but i belive\agress that a 25 limit is adequate). just feels to me "low" for the usa standards. this guy just killed because he wanted, i guess he should have been acused of murder not Manslaughter.
@Saffier Van der hoef 20 for this and i saw a kid 17 old that go on to a robbery with a uncle, dont do anything, and got 40 [even when he was clear reabilitated, but the judge give him the finger] ( he was black)
His lack of remorse after having just killed a father is pretty shocking. Hearing that he had used his firearm in other traffic incidents raises major red flags.
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 11:47:25 (edited 2021-02-21 11:47:59 )
@khali edwards him being a father is relevant to his lack of remorse. And you can see him come to that realization at the beginning when he talks about how all he remembers after going to his car are people talking about kids.
First of all I'm not pivoting. I'm directly addressing your, "if he hadn't pushed him" arguement. I'm taking it further and saying if the gun toter had taken the plate number and dailed 911, this whole situation wouldn't have happened.
I personally don't care how pissed off someone is about a parking space that no handicapped person is complaining about. If a handicapped person had confronted her, then MAYBE my opinion would be different. Michael was not in need of that spot, and if he was pissed off over concrete with painted lines over them, he needs to get a life. He claims he was retired at 30, which stands to reason why he has no life. Which also explains why he is patrolling a gas station parking lot.
You know nothing of what i believe politically. I don't care about people having guns. I have a problem with idiots shooting and killing someone with it because they were pushed, after starting a confrontation for no reason
11 likes
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 18:01:34 (edited 2021-02-21 18:04:49 )
@khali edwards I trully hope you dont genuinely believe that, I really hope that if you killed a man in fron of his kids you would at least feel remorse(which is the only relevant part of being a father here, the remorse). And yeah the decition to immediately shove him was horrible. But then again, drejka also placed himself in a situation that he admits coupd have been dangerous and he also admits that if he didnt carey a gun, he wouldnt have confronted the woman over a parking space. And by that logic if drejka hadnt shot a man he wouldn't be doing 30 years in prision. And we really dont know if michael would have shot him either way, he was found guilty of brandishing his gun at other people over traffic and stuff like that. And the shot was unessary to begin with, just showing his gun was more than enough force and would have been the best response, but then he went on and shot a man who was walking away "in self defense". It seems to me he was just scared and has no idea what self defense means, but given his past behavior of brandishing guns its also possible he was just waiting for an excuse to use it.
@khali edwards and I get that, but no one was saying that him being a father was relevant to the assault(which even then it kinda is my man, drejka was shouting at his wife, who was there with his kids in the middle of the night) so its not like marquis assaulted him for "no reason", even if its not justified, he had a pretty good reason:protect his wife and kids.
3 likes
Billy Elden Ring2021-02-21 19:01:50 (edited 2021-02-21 19:02:26 )
@khali edwards and Im not answering your "what ifs" because I dont think they are relevant. We have no idea how Michael would have responded if marquis shouted instead of shoving, shooting him was already an over reaction, we cant know for sure if he wouldnt also overreact to a man shouting at him. Hes pulled out his gun over less in the past. I didnt get that part of slugging, do you mean if marquis slugged michael or if michael slugged marquis? And the last point we can also say "if drejka hadnt gotten into a heated argument(that he instigated) he wouldnt be serving a 30 year sentence in prision". I just dont see the point in questions like that, theres a million what ifs that would have changed everything, but things happened the way they did and thats we can really go with.
@khali edwards once again. completely different situations. if he had just never approached the car then i could arguably say then none of this would have happened. someone pushing you does not give the right to shoot someone. it would’ve been a different story if they were both armed or the other guy had beaten him to a pulp. if it was a women then it once again would’ve been a completely different situation. as explained in the video. the father takes his step back away from the gun after seeing the gun and is then shot after. if this situation happened where a women was pushed and then soon after the pusher was backing up and shot then yes maybe she would be put to court for manslaughter. i wasn’t bringing attention to the fact that he was a father in anyway. in fact was not responding to that part of your comment at all. you saying that is he was a father is irrelevant is a part of your argument rather than the whole argument.
@khali edwards There were witnesses that said there was loud screaming, so it is justified that he is defensive once realizing that a grown man is screaming at his girl. You’re defending him, period. No matter how you phrase it, no matter how many metaphors or hypothetical situations you create...your end point is: he should’ve never “assaulted” him. So at the end of the day, you are still on the shooters side and throwing a tantrum that people “aren’t understanding your point”. No, we understand it, and it’s wrong.
@khali edwards I wasn't really speaking legally. I was just pointing out he had a reason to push him. He wasn't yelling at him. He was yelling at a his wife and 3 kids under 6 yrs old. I'd imagine pushing him away would be a somewhat natural response for a dad/husband who thinks his family is being threatened.
@khali edwards dude, of course he did wrong assaulting him... but doesn't justify killing him!! in front of his wife and three kids!! absolutely outrageous to read people defending a KILLER.
@Mark Stark The wife was a grown ass woman and it takes two to argue. You can't put it all on Drejka and even if you could it wouldn't justify physical force in response to a mere argument. Especially if you're going to keep coming at someone after you've knocked them to the ground. That's a serious threat.
And being black has nothing to do with it. Not even sure why you think that matters. Black people can control themselves just like everybody else.
@khali edwards he could’ve just blatantly smoked dude for walking up to his car and claimed he thought his wife was in danger right? He wasn’t in deadly situations got pushed . People get shoved all the time . When you got shoved at school did you pull out a 45 and shoot probably not . We all have our opinions but even if you break it down in the law dude was bogus
@thrdeye the disrespect you would have to even have the gall to walk up to my car talk shit to my wife bro and speak to her without me present knowing I’m around and we could talk it out ? Nah that’s not how that work
@Mark Stark McGlockton was inside the store well before Drejka arrived. Not that it matters because we don't live in some backwards honor culture where a woman must be spoken to through her husband (which he wasn't, they were only boyfriend/girlfriend) and disrespect is answerable with violence.
He assaulted him and he also didn’t know if he even hit him at this time so. I think they are both in the wrong the guy should not have pushed him outta nowhere like that for no reason and Michael shouldn’t have shot him as he backed away
0 likes
Regina Tran2021-03-30 10:36:45 (edited 2021-03-30 10:37:11 )
when he was brought in for the interrogation, was the guy pronnounced dead yet?
The moral of the story: Park wherever you god damn please, and push people around and get physical if they dare to confront you about it. Oh and NEVER talk to cops without an attorney present.
Moral of the story; Don’t initiate an altercation cos you think you’re a big man, and then shoot a person cos they push you over when you are appearing to be a threat to his wife and family. This man deserves to do prison time, he took a life, that he clearly shouldn’t have. Your view of this is skewed. You’re welcome.
King Maniac2022-03-29 01:12:43 (edited 2022-03-29 01:13:03 )
Wow, what a sad case. I feel terrible for the victim, and their family.
I entirely agree with the sentence, but I do believe that Michael didn't have malicious intent. I believe that he was already in a frantic state from his argument, and with his mind racing wasn't thinking properly. But that doesn't excuse the fact that he shot a man who was protecting his family, and then retreating when he saw the gun.
@serpens8 he had several road rage incidents in which he threatened other drivers with his firearm. He may have been attacked, but he sure as hell was looking for any reason to shoot someone.
@serpens8 the man was pushed yes but if you look in the security footage the man who pushed him backed up was soon as he saw the gun and stood there. he literally just shot someone who backed up from him. the man didn’t even have a weapon. he shot someone for them pushing him. please rewatch this if you still think he was in the right.
@lex the imposter It was half a second, the guy with a gun was in a strong emotional arousal, and if he felt somewhat threatened, he was not really mistaken. He got 20 years because the "victim" was black. Just imagine the situation in reverse, a black samaritan and an arrogant white family. Do you think he would get 20 years prison? I don't think so.
@✿MJF✿ First the (gunman) made it clear that he felt he safe to approach the car, because he had the gun. When the husband came out due to the commotion, had the (gunman) not been so close to the car - and the wife getting out of the car - I really think the husband would have verbally confronted the (gunman) rather than giving him the sharp shove. The (gunman) had clearly made his point to the wife that he was offended by her parking in the handicap spot but couldn't let it go at that. He made his point to the husband that he was offended by being shoved, and even though the husband demonstrated he got the point by backing away, the (gunman) couldn't let it go at that. So very sad, such a senseless tragedy.
Yup. When I was young I was ignorant of how long white supremacy and nationalists specifically have had their culture in US. I though because I grew up in a time of “hey it’s not murder central” that racism wasn’t so prevalent. But I was wrong. And shamefully adopted cultural norms I thought were norms but were just norms inside these circles of racists that they try making mainstream. Literature has been one cultural tool they’ve used for a long time. White supremacists literature exists and is disgusting. Propaganda tools used to infect our minds with double thinks and double speaks. Telling ourselves “we love freedoms and small government🇺🇸“ but being ok with banning gays from marry (let alone live for a long time) women to make bodily decisions, migrants come to this country just like how our ancestors did , etc. hypocrite are designed and made through the factories of information like movies, books, tv, events, family stories, opinions, religion, idols,
No it is because you has a weak body and got slammed on the floor while the father was slightly stepping backwards and he did not want to wait until the father pulled out a gun or rushed him.
@Tobi you either support the father or the guy who shot him. They were both engaged in combat and were trying to kill each other when the guy with the gun won. How is the guy with the gun supposed to know that the father would have used his gun behind cover when he pulled out his gun? There are many unexplored factors
@✿MJF✿ If someone punched me I would absolutely shoot them - punches can fucking KILL you. So can shoving someone down. Stop defending assault you lowlife.
Why are men 95% of the prison inmates? Is it because of female supremacy, and because men are oppressed by our criminal justice system? Remember that all your answers about men will also apply to black men.
@customsongmaker No, I do. But, your analogy incorrectly assumes that black men are not frequently given harsher sentencing for the same, or often lesser, crimes. What lands a white guy two years probation and community service can often land a black man even longer in prison. Hence why I called out your false equivalency.
Nice attempt at trying to insinuate I'm racist though. Ten points for that.
@customsongmaker Okay, I see what you're trying to do here. So, let me break this down to a much more simple analogy.
Let's say you, me, and a third person are all at a party, right? The host starts serving drinks. The random guy gets a full glass. I get half a glass. You get 1/4 of a glass. We are not on equal footing simply because we're both not getting a full glass, because you very clearly received less than I did.
Similarly, just because men are all incarcerated at a higher rate than women, does not mean black men are not discriminated against more than white men.
Doubling down on logical fallacies doesn't make the first one magically accurate. It just makes your argument worse.
@Funny Valentine Did Nothing Wrong - men are the ones with the 1/4 glass, women are the ones with the full glass. What's your point? And women are the ones hosting the party and deciding who gets what, since women have been the majority of voters for 100 years and decide every election.
@ShadowDante Gaming - the police asked him if he knew talking to someone might lead to a confrontation. Oddly, they didn't ask the same thing of the man's wife after her mouth got him killed.
@Lili Da - if an old man standing there makes you want to push him down, possibly killing him, then don't be so surprised if you get shot. Remember the cop that barely pushed an old man, and the old man fell over and hit his head and almost died? People wanted to kill the cop for that, because idiots only look at who won and feel sorry for the loser who started it and couldn't finish it.
@Think Tank >Person who routinely harasses people over minor transgressions and immediately reaches for his gun to threaten people when things aren’t going his way. >Person who shoots an unarmed, retreating man in the chest. >Person who was proven guilty in court and rightly spending most of his remaining years in prison. >Weakass man who has no gun in prison
@Jaco Oosthuizen I’m American and support this message. Too many terrified pussies with guns.
What percent of shoves end up in someone beating a defenseless man to death? This guy is with his family. Yes, he crossed the line shoving the guy, but nothing suggests he’s about to give up everything over this.
@Sean Matthew King - you say "if the guy had hit his head and died, the other guy should go to prison".
If you're dead, it doesn't help you at all that your killer is sent to prison. Would you like to see some videos of men on the ground being kicked in the head repeatedly, their attackers stealing their pants and laughing and dancing?
@Lafonda williams "the criminal being hurt" You mean murdered. The word you're looking for is murder, there. And, also, y'know. Guy wasn't a criminal. Saw someone acting in a threatening manner towards his significant other and acted. Saw the murderer-to-be was armed, visibly retreated, only to be shot anyway.
@✿MJF✿ to be clear, watch the video agaiin (haven't read this full thread yet, specifically responding to "And then the guy backed away but he pulled the gun out anyway." He was APPROACHING the shooter as he drew, he started to back away in the middle of the draw, likely once he knew what was coming. having said that, the shove wasn't justified, the draw was 100% justified, the shot was NOT justified, and I support the verdict.
@Zeron Peat racism is ok then when blm does it? side note, let women decide, the problem is whether or not another human life is involved. I don't share the opinion that a zygote is a human life, nor do i support the option to abort and kill a baby up to 9 months, at SOME point between those two it becomes a human life, and has its OWN rights to life. Before that happens if she doesn't want it then let her do as she wishes. The only seriously controversial part i think i have, is that a man should also be able (without HER consent) to sign away all rights and responsibilities (she must be made aware while she still has a choice) toward the child, just as she can.
@Scott Lyman he was walking towards him as he started to draw, that said it also isnt necessarily a lie if you believe what you are saying. Keeping in mind, I am not defending the shot (just the draw) and I fully support the guilty verdict.
@Sean Matthew King the "shove for yelling at his wife" cant be justified as he was more than an arms length away from the vehicle when the husband came out, she got out and approached the shooter by her own choice, removes any justification
@Tanner then if you do you should also be in jail, scream or talk or chastise isnt illegal, and she got out and closed the distance, clearly not concerned he was a threat.
@Funny Valentine Did Nothing Wrong she got out and approached him in sight of her husband, no grounds to shove him. the draw was also justified as he was still approaching him on the ground, halfway THROUGH the draw he starts to back away, shot not justified.
@75ur15 no, you’ve got your order mixed up there. He shoved him to the ground, stood still for a split second as the suspect fell, suspect immediately draws weapon, man notices it and starts backing up as soon he saw... then was shot as he took multiple steps back. Unjustified indeed, case closed and I don’t even see why you felt the need to refute what I’ve said before.
@Terri Kay if someone is that lightweight then at that point they should just live in a hamster ball bubble because them falling down 1 feet would cause their legs to snap
Got to admire how smart these police officers are in making Drejka feel like comfortable about being under arrest. Lots of Please. Thank you. Can I get you anything? Are you OK? He clearly thinks\feels that they are on his side and fully sympathize with everything he has to say. He is made to feel that they are THERE for him, and that he is the victim who was about to be killed if he did not use his gun.
Reminds me of Michael Dunn who shot at the red car and killed a young guy because they played loud music. Both cases could have been easily avoided..but they just had to get confrontational and use their guns.
@Robert Campbell no you go ahead and tell me what’s inaccurate.
0 likes
Robert Campbell2022-03-20 16:57:18 (edited 2022-03-20 16:58:36 )
@Guy Lindquist There was no rape. Even the girl said he just grabbed her arm. The fact that there were already over 1,000 white people present, some were armed, and that they had already demanded Rowland be given to them is not in dispute. Nor is there dispute that the 75 black men offered to help the sheriff protect Rowland from the already formed mob. NOR is there any question that the first act of violence was a gun battle, not a "mass slaughter." I understand you want to frame it in the way that best fits your "blacks are violent criminals" narrative, but none of this is in doubt, even at the time.
Well, other than the fact that one case was instigated by loud music and the other was instigated by being shoved 5 feet in the air, sure. Exactly the same .
I love your videos is saddens me that YouTube is doing this to all these channels. I really hope you guys can make it through! Much love and appreciation for all the work you put into these ❤️
@Zeze Omer YouTube keeps removing videos and then letting them back up on their channel for whatever reason, but all these other channels can have the crime scene photos and what not and never be taken down so it makes no sense
It’s really interesting how the defendant uses phrases like “force multiplier”, “neutralize the threat”, etc etc. Are those police/military terms? Because I don’t think the defendant served in those fields, which makes me think he’s using them to impress the officers—frame himself as an extrajudicial authority—or because he’s watched too many war movies and it seems cool.
I think it's just to sound proficient, that way they can deflect the idea that they acted on anger or fear, which judging by the facts by themselves seem to be exactly what happened
How can this guy think that he was not to blame for this?!?!?! He instigated the entire event. Sure, the victims should not have parked in the handicap spot illegally, if that is in fact what they did. Either way, that was none of his business, also, he parked illegally as well. He wasn’t even in a parking space. Had just parked, and entered the store to do whatever it was that he was stopping there for, this horrible tragedy would never have occurred. I feel horrible for the victim and his family, Especially his children that witnessed their father being murdered in cold blood.
Exactly. No where does it ever even say if one of them was allowed to park there and not only that but we do t even know what that spot looked like. It might not be obvious it’s a disabled spot
This is ironically the third episode where a Floridian felt threatened enough to pull a gun to defend. These videos are awesome documentaries. NOT JUSTIFIED and NOT truly unjustified. What's the odds that 3 criminal cases on multiple channels were 3 stories of white men feeling they were threatened by black men encounters. Is this a southern concept??? If you grew up in Brooklyn NY I lived a similar fear of "cultural" or "race" misunderstanding. Sure haters will say I'm a Yankee from NYC but the ripple effect of slavery-era American history haunts me and will my son and his kids.
We will not all think or act the same... Ever! We have a different history and upbringing. All our discussion is not going to erase English domination or colonization (including slavery). The realism is that despite our ugly past, the present (survivors) are still battling whether the confederate flag should appear embossed on State flags. Whether Statues of Christopher Columbus should be staged in city parks. We here in the USA just celebrated MLK Day. For many it is a day off from school and work.
Instead of erasing history, celebration of people that made (at the time acceptable choices) Let's not erase our past but pose counter statues in those parks, accept (not mistakes) but consider it was the norm and without those (looking for words YT will find offensive) people who were [Hitler-like] enslaved tens of thousands to be enslaved. Made this country great and something we all should be benefiting from.
I say forget tearing down the memorials and focus on moving forward. What is to come next... blow off 2/3 of the Mount Rushmore monument because someone disagrees? Rename the capitol of our country and a state? Slave owners. Discredit them all but you can't change the future by forgetting your past. Everyone suggesting Washington as a hero was only made so by his use of slave labor. SO easily forgotten.
I've said too much and will clearly draw haters. I believe we should all get along as Christ would want us to. I hate politics but I love my fellow man regardless of skin color, faith or origin. It's a New Year... I wish all that read my sermon to find peace and happiness for themselves and their families and let's all work to make this a better life (outside of the media and politics)
"no need to be in a defensive state of mind" As an extremely defensive person, to my own detriment, being defensive is 100% not an indication of guilt.
I dunno man, the moment you pulled a gun on someone that arent with a gun or a knife on hands, you pretty much won the encounter 9 out of 10 times, because anyone who has at least 3 working braincells know you dont try to draw when you are on someone's aim.
Case in point. He hasn't fought anyone who wasn't half his size since he learned a lesson in his twenties. That's when he bought a gun. Just in case someone his size reacted to his nonsense again.
To be fair. In that moment I don't think he knew the other guy was dead. He waited in his car for the police. The man wasn't declared dead until he got to the hospital. Before you talk to your lawyer they are very tight lipped about information. He probably didn't know the guy was dead during this interview.
imagine being the loved ones and families of the victim and hearing that your dad who was unfairly taken from you was the one in the wrong and the man who killed him was the victim. that would just be heartbreaking on every single level.
There was plenty of parking at that store,... It looked to me that the disability parking spot was father than all the other empty parking spot,. I'm disabled and there are some occasions that people irresponsible,. And take a spot for hurt people and that can be irritating,... That poor family, honestly didn't probably see the spot,... This guy is a nut,.,. He should never be let out of prison
The opposite of this cry baby coward is the cop who proudly, rightfully so, retires never having discharged their firearm. Kudos to not using too much force.
I wonder if the victim would push the wacko to the ground if he knew he was packing heat. My bet is no, he wouldn´t. I say this because during a confrontation what you want is a de-escalation, not snapping into physicallity and pushing a possible nut-job to the ground. Either you should call the cops straight away or at least calmly talk to the guy and try to make him realise how much of an idiot he was being at that moment. I find it always sad to see someone die, but this was perfectly avoidable if the victim didn´t decide to play the hero in a country where black people are deemed as a threat even by police let alone gun-happy wackos.
You don’t get into a shouting match with a man’s wife or girlfriend with their small children in a car over a parking spot.
Some people pack heat because they think it saves them from consequences, and the shooter seems to me like a prime example. I don’t understand why you’re more upset about the shoving rather than the shooting
27:00 basically translates to "I can start all the arguments I like, because I've made sure I will win them. Yeah, the other guy might be dead, but I knew I'd be fine."
Conceal carrying,super truck driving, training in close quarters combat disciplines,puts time in on the range regularly and most definitely shoots with heavy bore long range rifles....starts moving his arms and body like a robot and could pretty much be wearing slings for both his arms cos he got shoved and or pushed with slightly excessive force and hit the ground.
This is the type of person who makes legal gun ownership look bad. Irresponsible and cowardly. If you won’t confront someone without a weapon you have even less business confronting them with a weapon.
Wanna know the worst part. This guy would have been a self described "responsible gun owner" before this incident. I wonder how many more "responsible gun owners" there are out there that are just like this guy. Living their lives every day hoping for the day they get to use their gun.
Not cool to park in a disability space, but this guy didn't even need the disability space. He could have just kept his mouth shut and called the police.
"That's my store"...... "I live just around the corner" - and that extends to he owns the store carpark, the street, and everybody who dares enter the area. Territorial issues, among other things.
I might have missed it, but appears no words spoken. First person knocked second person to the ground with no warning. Second person shot first person, again with no warning. They both over reacted to a real or perceived threat and no one said a thing.
I hadn't heard about this case and was literally holding my breath waiting for the verdict. I think I would have thrown my phone in disgust if he been found not guilty. What an absolute waste of a life... I am so glad that these entitled despicable people are arrogant enough to believe they don't need a lawyer.
The father's first instinct was to protect his partner. After getting shot, his first instinct was to run back to his kid inside. Even with no sound you can see how tragic the situation was. That poor brave man and his family suffering by the cruel hand of an evil coward.
You literally just saw an hour long video proving how violent force was unjustified, and here you are praising the victim who also used unjustified force in a verbal argument. The sweet irony. Both these guys should not be free to roam in the streets if they have to resort to violence in a situation where violence was not needed in the first place.
@F R So you're telling me that if someone walks up to someone you care about and start arguing with them for--to you--no apparent reason, you wouldn't get confrontational?
@meme lord 9000 Is that really what you understood from my comment?? Try reading it again. Read it as many times as you need in order to grasp what I meant. Maybe ask your parents help if you have to.
@F R I totally agree that they should not have parked in the handicapped spot and that him pushing him was unnecessary, but he was scared for his partner and the kids in the car. I understand one act of transgression to protect loved ones. He also stopped when he realized how much the situation escalated, it's not like he also took out a gun or beat the guy's face in. He didn't deserve to get shot for his actions. Just because you don't approve of what someone does doesn't mean they deserve death.
@Sophia Goodman-Merel Well that act of transgression cost him his life and left a fatherless child. If you have to resort to violence when someone argues with you, then you are just as guilty as the shooter. Absolutely no pity for neither of them. And people who share your mentality of justifying a violent act when someone who poses no physical threat, are the reason we have overcrowded prisons. Think of it this way. If we were arguing about this in person, and I had a loved one near me, would I be justified to knock you down simply because I want to protect my loved ones?? Absolutely not.
@F R if you think shoving a guy who is actively threatening your wife and kids over a parking spot, (micheal would’ve pulled the gun if mcg didnt come out of the store btw. Hes done that to another mother w kids bc of road rage…) is unreasonable and unjustifiable, i really hopr your partner and children gets threatened by a guy w a gun. Lets see what you do.
This entire thing gave me second hand embarrassment 😩what kind of defense was that? I’m not laughing at the situation. God rest this poor man’s soul and God be with his little family😔 but this idiot really thought he was doing something great. He’s a racist mall cop who wanted brownie points for murdering an innocent man
So he had numerous cases where he threatened other motorists with a gun and they didn’t lock his ass up then? They didn’t do shit to him until he murdered a man for a physical assault, after confronting the victim’s wife over a parking violation, only because he was armed and felt powerful enough to bully her.
i don’t understand why people think that just because they claim “sELf dEfEnSe” that they will get off scot free. Sometimes even abuse victims or actual self defense victims get jail time.
Why is it so difficult for some people to just mind their own business? The entitlement of some individuals to just say and do what they want and think they’ll face no consequences, is just lost upon me🤦🏽♀️
its amazing how easy it is for self defense to turn into a violent crime. If the guy did take a step towards him it would have very easily been considered self defense. Drejka is a fool for firing his weapon at that time. situation was defused for at least 2 and a half seconds.
I know a lot of people will disagree with me, but situations like this are why I generally think it's a bad idea to walk around armed all the time. I don't think the guy should have shoved him, but there was no reason to escalate the situation that much farther. It's not like the handicapped parking spot was going to thank him for defending it against people who don't have the appropriate placards. This reminds me of the Michael Dunn case where he shot at the car and killed a boy with the whole altercation starting off because he thought their radio was too loud.
The system doesnt work, but I think in history of the Americas in some nations, the society functions when 1 life is taken, and not 2, and not many. I think Drejka shouldve been revoked and banned from owning a gun.
I noticed at 28:00 the detective asks, "would you be willing to confront people if you didn't carry a weapon?" The suspect responds, "I've been carrying most of my adult life so I can't really answer that." The detective restates his question and the guy repeats his answer. The inability to answer or even entertain a hypothetical question is a significant indicator of cognitive impairment. This probably feeds the suspect's psychopathy, as he is unable to imagine scenarios or lived experiences that are not his own.
I swear I remember Jim did a video on jussie smollett.? Right? It started with news clips about the “attack” then it went to him breaking down Jussie early life and how it may have impacted his approach to life and decision making or something like that?
This guy was the aggressor!…. Just because everyone has the right to carry doesn’t mean everyone should carry! WTH Force multiplier?!! Wtf It’s called a force continuum! 🤣😂
gun control is so important and this case can be used as an example were someone is going around confronting people with a weapon and no fear for his life, its disgusting
Just to be clear. He went in there to get snacks on EBT... not with his own money... I guarantee it And I'm sorry but when you assault someone you just might get shot, my opinion is his own fault
Totally devastating. This guy is a complete arse. A whole family broken coz of his out of control behaviour. A father loses his life when all he wanted to do was get snacks for his kids. So sad. And he'll get out and be able to live his life. The wife and kids should sue him and take every dollar he has now and every dollar he makes in the future. F him.
in some countries you cant just pull out your gun against someone just pushing you.Forces must be equal in situation. is there something like that is US? in addition you cant just buy a gun without psychology test. İ think these are good things.
This dude likely would have gotten off in trial if he’d shut up and gotten a good attorney. A good attorney likely could have convinced a jury he was reasonably in fear of his life if he hadn’t already made so many incriminating statements. Like I always say, I am glad these people talk to police without a lawyer.
if you belive it was self defense or not, pushing someone should NOT justify their death... some of your thought processes are messed up because micheal escalated the situation for no reason! he did not need to jump straight to the use of deadly force, and if he had just threated the guy he would be an asshole, but he couldn't stop there.
This jerk got what he deserved. But why did the victim push him? I feel it was a moment of unbridled ego to "defend" the wife. So many cases of men doing stupid things to defend others, often females.
@Justin Spirito that 'female' was the mother of his children. She was alone with their kids when the jerk(who also by the way parked illegally) accused her of parking illegally and screamed at her. Any man who get pissed of at that. A random dude who has screaming and shouting in front of his kids
@Adwaita B. I know. That's just the issue, he need not have done that. Put the wife in safety, stand in front, reduce the tension, bring calm. Being the tough guy is not always smart. Remember the fireman who shot at the young black boy because his wife cried out, and the guy who killed a man because his girlfriend was angry at the man for not buying her meal.
One guy starts conversation with pushing other person quite violently, the other guy immediately ends "the conversation" by shooting. Both overreacted, but obviously jail and death are not exactly the same outcome.
I live very close to the exact store where this happened. He killed that man in cold blood. The whole neighborhood knew it. The state knew it. The world knew it. I’m glad he got charged and let’s see what comes of the sentencing.
@Isaac Q That was probably calculated though, because if nothing had happened one could think it was less of a threat. By virtue of pretending to have been severely injured (oscar-worthy performance btw...) he was trying to raise the level of the threat he was under. So him getting injured and being in pain could add a further step to trying to convince that he was in fear. Let me put it this way, Scenario 1. A guy comes up and pushes you, you get pushed two steps back. Scenario 2, A guy comes to you and pushes you to the ground breaking your arm and you bang your head on the pavement leaving a bloody mark on your face. Which one of these scenarios would most likely give a better ground for self-defense? The second clearly. I doubt his arm was really hurting much or anything, it was more about trying to demonstrate that he was injured and in pain (oscar-worthy performance by the way, how he can barely move it and then just is totally fine waving the arms around later)
I think in his own mind he is the victim and doesn't thought he did anything wrong. He assumes he is in the right. He might not even know he just killed a man
I feel that people like this who own guns and are gun fanatics are secretly just hoping that there will come a day when they need to use it on someone...
Nah, I own a gun, guns are a fun hobby for me, and I hope I never have to use it. I don’t want the responsibility of taking a life and I don’t want to ruin my own life in the process. I have a lot to lose and I don’t want to kill someone’s son, father, brother. But if it came down to protecting my child and wife from an actual threat, like a TRUE us or them situation, I’d have to do it. Guns should be used as shields, not as weapons. Not everyone is fortunate to live in a safe area either. In the super slim chance someone breaks into my house and tries to harm us, you better bet I’m using it. Or carjack my car with my child inside.
Saying all people who are into guns are looking to shoot someone, is like saying every black guy who shoves you is a deadly threat. The world doesn’t work in absolutes. But there’s always a subset of insane people in every hobby or every mundane facet of life.
That’s like saying everyone who owns a sports car and is a car fanatic is secretly hoping they can kill someone in a fatal accident when they speed. That’s ridiculous
@sabretechv2 I'm not saying ALL gun owners are like that. I'm only saying people like this man who think its all a game or something are like that. I understand shooting guns is a fun hobby, I've shot guns myself in the past, but when you're like this guy talking about the details like its no big deal that he just shot someone to death, that's where it's a problem.
I'm just saying it seems like this guy was just waiting for a fight to break out some time so he has an excuse to use his gun. So I agree that this guy is an example of one of those insane people in this hobby who take it too far.
Also I'm pretty sure it wouldn't make any sense for the owner of a sports car to want to get into a fatal crash while speeding because the whole reason they own it is to have it and use it for fun. The point of a car like that is to look nice and drive fast, the point of a gun is to shoot it. Where and how you wish to shoot the gun is what makes the difference I guess.
40:00 Would you change anything? I think, doing it again knowing what I know now, I'd still shoot him while he backed away. !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Can you imagine how many African-American people died in those circumstances? Especially during segregation? They had no voice, there were no video cameras, nothing to defend themselves.
I seriously can not believe that they let this guy leave the police station. And also, what would have happened if that man didn't come out the store? Would Michael have justified killing the woman?!? This guy is crazy.
Hate when he uses terms to look so smart and hate when he says negative...negative...negative...he killed the family person....if he not fire the wife of that guy would stop everything...he would not end him up especially with children in car...sad when person died...because of someone feeling like he control shops parking and that ot his shop...because he goes there everyday...
To be fair, if he didn't push him he'd be alive, but he had no right to shoot either, moral of the story : calm the fuck down before you do something unessesarily stupid (yell at a car, push someone to the ground)
No, if the guy didn't shoot him he would be alive to day.
That is ultimately caused his death. Using the logic you want we could say if Drejka minded his own business the other guy would be alive so it still comes down to Drejka
why don't the police ever have now a sort of contraption with 'true' or 'false'? They used to have them years ago. Surely that would help a great deal?
Pete Der2022-01-17 16:24:41 (edited 2022-01-17 16:45:58 )
The suspect is a bad person and was looking for trouble. I am glad he will be locked up for a long time. But I’ve noticed very few of the comments point out that the victim should not have shoved the suspect like that. I’m not victim blaming, as obviously he didn’t deserve to die, just saying that you can’t just violently shove people if you don’t like what they’re saying. If he had just ignored him things would have turned out better. Very sad story and I hate that someone lost their life and that the victims wife and kid(s) had to experience that. But just makes you wonder what if he hadn’t done that. Although with this suspect it was just a matter of time before it happened.
This was fake bravery because he had a gun. He had no problem screaming at a woman.. Sorry personal opinion, he thinks he's got authority and is a bad a$$ because he carries a gun. These are the type of people that don't deserve to carry a gun, theybare dangerous. A young man, father lost his life because this bully tried to enforce a rule.. he could have call the police. 😪
This is what you call jobless behaviour 🥴 And this guy cries about missing his DOGS!? He has just robbed a family off an important figure...a husband and father and he shows no remorse about it!
No lawyer should get people like this off by instructing their statement.. the video is clear. Yet.. that’s what criminal defense lawyers do. I hate criminal defense lawyers.
It's situations like these that make the point clear: When you carry, a gun should not be your first answer for anything. It's the last answer to a life-threatening situation. Obviously, those things happen. But if you can make sure you don't have to draw? If you can ensure the fight doesn't even happen? THAT should be your first answer. De-escalation.
I think the immediate availability of the weapon alone compels certain people to use it, even when wholly unnecessary.
There are so, so many homicides these days over situations that likely would have ended in a fistfight in a time when less people were walking around armed.
There are responsible gun owners out there, but there are also people who believe they're responsible gun owners, yet pull their weapon after being cut-off in traffic or during a verbal dispute with a family member.
Getting rushed from behind by a black guy younger and bigger than you, and him moving in on you once you are down, is absolutely a life-threatening situation.
That man was just waiting for a day he could use his gun. He wanted to be billy badass with a woman and kids in a parking spot but when the man comes to protect his wife and kids suddenly hes weak and scared for his life? Disgusting.
Waiting for a day? Dude shoved him to the ground. You speak of this from a outside prospective in hindsight. Why are you all of a sudden justifying physical assault? He wasn't attacking her, he was using his 1A to address somthing he saw was a problem. Did he use excessive force? Maybe. But don't use that stupid shit of "hE wAs pRoTeCtInG hIs wIfE"
@Ishizu09 no, the charge fit the crime. He definitely committed manslaughter. Hence why he wasn't charged with murder. Just because the man killed him doesn't excuse the physical assault.
@De Kip the man that laid dead inside the store and the terrified wife and children are, at the end of the day, the sole victims. The man with the gun was shoved, yes, but there was plenty of time for him to see the guy backing up, backtracking and then running in the opposite direction.
He is a murderer. Nothing more. The only one at fault is him, not the dead man
@Marielle Gonzalez I think you're too imprecise. The killer was in the right until he pulled the trigger. Before that, clearly the victim was at fault for escalating a situation that was entirely caused because he couldn't be bothered to park elsewhere.
He was attacked by some random guy and he pulled out his gun in self defense. The guy was just yelling at a woman for disobeying the law by and he decided to get violent as soon as he saw him by pushing him to the ground. There's literally nothing wrong with that. Anyone else in that situation fearing for their life would have done the same.
@Marielle Gonzalez If he honestly thought a man talking to his wife because he obviously parked on a spot reserved for disabled drivers was attempting to hurt them, the victim has serious problems comprehending situations.
What likely happened was that the victim realized he was in the wrong but couldn't accept that someone dared to complain about him. Afterwards he decided that starting a fight would be the best options to either look good or be "intimidating". Why else would someone attack a guy discussing something with your wife?
The shooter took the other guys action too personal and wanted revenge. I'm not justifying his action in any way.
This is the most plausible scenario: 1. Person A is lazy and parked in disabled spot 2. Person B comes in and discusses why it's wrong (I'm assuming) 3. Person A feels attacked and pushes B to the ground 4. Person B pulls out weapon, Person A retreats.
Up until this point Person B demonstrated perfectly legal behaviour. He was attacked and pulled out a gun to defend himself. Lethal action is only permitted however, if the threat continues to persist, which it definetly did not. This leads to: 5. Person B shoots Person A retreating
This changes the entire scenario. I doubt that the shooter intended to shoot the victim from the getgo, all he wanted was likely to confront the victim (which is perfect behaviour, people abusing disabled parking spots are egoistical assholes).
@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ I think this is the most acurate comment, in my opinion at least. Maybe the lesson with this video is: don't let anger take control, you never know how people will react.
@Joe Mo he’d also be alive if the guy just minded his business, like at the end of the day, he had zero authority to get bitchy w the woman in the car bc it wasn’t his job and it wasn’t any of his concern. People keep trying to be fair by saying “moral of the story is, don’t approach someone with violence bc you don’t know how they’ll react” but are ignoring the fact that the shooter actively and knowingly (he said himself that he knew it could cause problems) put himself in a potentially dangerous situation without knowing how those around him would react. The main difference is that the shooter openly stated that he was confident BECAUSE he had his gun, this is not justified gun use and it’s good that he got time, shit the man literally had a history of threatening people with his gun, like cmon
@Ishizu09 so your saying the guy that blindsided him from behind was weak? Dude really, yeah he shouldnt of shot him but the fact is the deceased shouldn’t pushed, thats not something a weak person would do, so many people like you trying to justify assault, lol pathetic, both are in the wrong........ and if he didnt shoot him this case would have been very different, but people are ignoring the assault because he pulled a gun.
@Biggie Smalls He should’ve never approached the car to begin with. He went to the store to buy whatever it is he was supposed to buy. He should’ve minded his business and went about his day. He was trying to play police when he should’ve went about his normal day. There wasn’t a handicap person in distress for the spot. He wasn’t handicap so that spot is of no importance to him. While I agree it’s ignorant parking in handicap, it’s also NONE OF MY BUSINESS. I can’t tell a man how to react to seeing another man yelling at his wife while his children are present. But I carry and it’s common sense that you don’t shoot at someone walking away.
@Sincerely Shell Okay, you say he's in the wrong for approaching the car, let's unpack that. You see somebody doing something illegal(barely illegal in this case, I know, just a minor infraction at this point), some people may just ignore it, and get on with their day. That's fine, as long as it isnt a severe crime being committed. On the other hand, some people may just find out why, which is not getting in other peoples business, because they're openly doing something wrong. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, I have done the same thing before........ And you said "its common sense that you don't shoot at someone walking away", I don't think you understand there is a major major major difference from watching the surveillance footage 10x over at 25% speed, frame by frame, and actually being in that moment. If somebody blindsided you, and they're quite larger than you, and you are laying on the floor not knowing what just happened or what is coming next, you would definitely think differently than how you are now. Everybody likes to play tough man behind a computer screen. Sure Drejka shouldn't have shot, the situation would have been suffice with just brandishing his weapon. But again, heat of the moment situations like this, I can absolutely see how he thought the deceased was a threat. I still think the deceased handled it just as badly. A fall like that (people in that are 40+ especially), can kill people. It happens more than you would think. What is even worse is that the family of the deceased is playing 110% victim........ That mentality disgusts me. Assault somebody and then cry when it backfires. Why didn't the deceased verbally amend the situation? Instead he walked out with ZERO KNOWLEDGE(aside from someone was telling his wife she was breaking the law), and fucking slammed him from behind to the ground....
@Braeden Walster Yup you say that sitting in your home watching the surveillance at 25% playback speed 10x over....... Put yourself in Drejka's shoes, you wouldn't have fucking seen that he was backing up. Stop acting like you're hot shit, In situations like this, the brain functions WAY differently than it does when you aren't in any danger.
@Chris Hansen Alright, your idea of what happened is twisted, you don't know enough about the situation. Drejka did not start the altercation, and he did NOT yell at her first. They weren't even yelling at each other by the time the deceased walked out, making it 110% unjustifiable to walk up behind someone speaking to your wife and fucking blindside him. If he hadn't done that, and maybe just got in the middle of Drejka and his wife, this whole fucking story wouldn't be a thing. But nope, big man has to play tough guy and violently slam Drejka.... I don't think Drejka is a murderer, and it's a fucking shame he's locked up for twenty years.
@d i n g d a n g If you read my comment I never excused the murder at all. Because it is nothing more than cold blooded murder. What I am saying is that the shooter did not do anything wrong until he pulled the trigger. Complaining about someone deliberately parking in a wrong space and pulling a gun after being attacked is not illegal. I would probably do the same. What is despicable is the fact that he shot someone retreating. My opinions would not change if the skin colours were reversed.
@Marielle Gonzalez I don't think you release how stressful a situation like this is. when the attacker took a step forward, that was probably the last thing his brain processed. That being said, brandishing the firearm was appropriate because he was on the ground with no means of escape, however, he should not have shot once the attacker took a step back. At the end of the day, the shooting was not justified, and manslaughter would be the correct charge
I mean the dude ran over there and pushed him hard enough for him to hit the ground, over a conversation. If you on that type timing be prepared for anything people will defend themselves to the fullest
@Xavi If you view the situation as a man pushes someone to the ground and gets shot, your framing the situation incorrectly. nobody is defending the shooting, but pushing someone to the ground from their blind-side is assault and could be lethal if they are unable to break the fall with their hands.
@Biggie Smalls Nah, taking it to 100 is pushing him and immediately closing the distance to stomp his head in... or sucker punching him. You don't push someone to the ground and stand and wait for a reaction 'cause you want to kill them.
The victim shouldn't have went straight to pushing him, but you're acting like they're both as bad as each other when the shooter is much worse. He didn't need to pull that trigger and he knows it, he DID have ample time to make the decision. He didn't draw, aim and immediately fire - if he DID, that would have been much less damning than pointing the gun long enough to see that the guy is unarmed, moving away and still pulling the trigger.
Poor little man isn't going to have his gun with him if someone pushes him in the chow line while he's serving those long years in prison and I bet he won't be mr. big balls ready to start arguments over dumb shit without it either, will he? He'll just hand over his pudding and say "please don't hurt me!" 'cause he's not a dumb guy, just a bad one that felt temporarily empowered.
Yeah especially considering how they said the information came out that in the couple years leading up to this he had already been in multiple other similar situations where he threatened people with a weapon. I think it said 2 of those incidents were women too
@Biggie Smalls pushing somebody has never in history been taking it from 0 to 100. Getting pushed on the ground is how 11, 12 year old kids fight. Pulling out a gun and right then and there because it happened to you, and then shooting the person who did it to you is taking it from 0 to 100
I've carried for my entire adult life too...when you carry, you don't start trouble. You don't flip the bird in traffic, you don't puff your chest out and get in shouting matches, you walk away. Really, it's a good policy whether you're armed or not, but you never create a situation where you might have to shoot someone.
EXACTLY,mind your business,be polite & make sure you don’t make anybody feel threatened by your actions,unless you witness someone in REAL potentially fatal danger,don’t go waving guns around,that’s not going to end in a good way for anybody.Basic rules to live by
It already kind of is, any concealed carry instructor worth a damn does their best to hammer it into folks' heads. You've got the means on you to elevate the stakes to the highest they can go, so don't voluntarily get into anything.
This guy got into the minutiae, which I try to stamp down to the best of my ability when folks are looking for information. JCS got one thing wrong on the 21 foot rule, it does not require the person to be visibly armed. Now, if you're grounded and someone unarmed is coming at you, yes. You can shoot. You get fists or feet to the head, you can't roll with it, and you've only got concrete to stop the rearward movement.
This is the minutiae, and while it's true, it's not what a carrier should be actively thinking about. The only question that's truly important is "did you HAVE to?" This man didn't, and most people don't. Most situations, if they get to the point of a weapon being produced, end there. Unless the person is mentally deranged, too stupid, or just too hot to cease. The man in this situation was not one of those, he disengaged instantly, the man had no right to shoot. If he wanted to press charges on the matter, that would've been a reasonable course of action. The second the man stopped, he lost all right, legal and moral, to use force, deadly or otherwise.
And.. always obey rules. You don't know you might run into Karen one day. And when Karens or anyone confronted you or doesn't look right, even if he's being rude to your wife, don't be hero. You never know if the Karen is armed or mentally unstable.
As others have said, any decent instructor will inform you of your duty to always de-escalate and avoid confrontation at all cost when carrying. This is why they say that an armed society is a polite society. Please go to a legitimate instructor and continue training with said instructor so you don't end up like this guy.
@Eiraqucam Of course. I carry as a plan Z, when there's no other options left but to give up and let what happens happen. That's about the long and short of it.
Few times in my life, I've had random violence spring up around and towards me, I was lucky enough to talk my way out or otherwise remove myself from the situation intact, but it just as easily could've gone the other way. I've had to call the police before, and by the time they arrive, whatever is going on has been done and over with.
Honestly, though, I think the biggest thing to understand is that it's really not an active thing. I've heard the same from locals, not just folks in other countries. "Why do you carry a gun to *?" or ever. When I leave the house, it goes in a secure holster, and it's on my belt inside the waistband of my pants.
Barring extreme circumstances, it just doesn't come into play, it's not going to go off, it's not going to FALL off. It's well concealed, so it doesn't play a role on any social interactions. It's just there. If all goes well, then the only time it's an issue is when you're a little too enthusiastic out to dinner, and you kinda wish it wasn't in your pants.
It's probably most apt to think of it like an Epi-pen. Unless something very bad happens, it's just one more thing you've got on your person. I remember a girl I had recently started dating at the time asking if I really thought I was gonna need it while we were out grabbing dinner, told her that if I thought I did, we'd be getting delivery instead.
I thought that the video is the most disturbing thing, but the comments oh boy. So many proud gun carrying people. It is like reading stories from a post-apocalyptic dystopia 😱.
@SavageGerbil Thanks for such a considered response. It's very foreign concept to me so it's great to hear first hand from people their rationale. Cheers.
Eiraqucam American here and I am wondering why others do not carry? There are MANY crazed people out there who would love to harm a woman, sneak in my home and hurt/kill me and even my kids. There are countless stories out there where a woman has been raped and murdered in her own home and these stories will continue to happen as long as mankind exists. Sometimes, the children are even murdered aling with the mother. These types of scenarios occur much more often than many people realize. I read about this stuff because I want to remain aware and I am also curious as to how the minds of psychos work. Anyway, when you see the things I’ve seen and have the knowledge I have, to know your life(or your kids lives more importantly)could be over in a second because you were unable to protect yourself, then you want to carry a gun. Just for protection. Or at least that’s the reason I have a gun in my home. It is under lock and key and behind a safe with a code. We also have one in a bolted down locked box beside our bed. My husband travels often at times and I will take full advantage of my right to protect myself and my loved ones. I suppose men or women who don’t attract a lot of attention would t get as scared as I have been before staying home alone. I have had a man come into my home in the middle of the night years ago before we moved down to Tn. I had no gun then and luckily I am a very light sleeper because I have kids. I heard him before he made it to one of our rooms. He heard me on the phone with the police and likely saw the light from my phone. I heard him walk out swiftly and I ran to lock the door. To be honest, I was younger and more ignorant to what people are capable of doing to others back then. The cops took 40 mns to get to my home because it was in the middle of the night and the few on duty were on another call completely on the other end of the county. It was a terrifying experience. With all that said, I would never ever get angry enough to shoot someone over something stupid like this fella in the video. I would absolutely be terrified enough to use a gun however in a situation where a man much larger and stronger than myself has broken into my home. I would unload on him without a single second thought. I have a couple stories things that have happened to myself or a close relative that have caused me to feel the way I do about guns. I have a cousin who was married and had a new baby when they were young. A large man showed up one winter night to their home in the middle of nowhere. To make a very long story short, of my cousin hadn’t had a gun, he would likely be dead. The second time the police had to come to my cousins house that night, the man heard the sirens and ran off again only to be struck by a vehicle in the dark. One of his legs were ripped from his body. The police soon figured out who he was and it was found he had beaten his wife almost to death a couple miles down the road. He was trying to find a place to hide. He was out of it on drugs. I simply don’t want to be a victim. That’s why most people carry. For protection.
@BS17 Your reasons are perfectly valid and truth be told, if I didn't live in Australia perhaps I would carry / own a gun myself. However, there is no justification for civilian gun ownership here and one thing that makes me feel safe in Australia is the fact that the "crazy" people you mention can't get hold of deadly weapons. Petty criminals can't get hold of them. Wannabe vigilantes like Michael Dunn can't. Truth be told, I feel bad for Americans that gun ownership feels / is necessary.
@Eiraqucam I wish guns didn't exsist honestly. I just know how many are out there and a lot of them are in the hands of bad people. Also, smaller, older, and less physical people need something to equalize the force. To be honest I carry a large handgun because I spend a lot of time hiking and camping in the deep woods and I do not want to become dinner for a bear.
I can't believe he's tryin to use "the camera wasnt hd" as his defense. It only took one time of watching it to see exactly what happened. It was more than clear enough
Agreed. As a former US paratrooper, I've ran into a few wannabes like this. They don't have the intelligence, courage, or mental stability to make it past Basic (if they can even get in) so they adopt the slang (poorly) and become firearm fanatics. I'm an 11B combat vet and I don't even see the need to own a sidearm. These guy's are dangerous because they're a sad combination of abject fear and self-hate.
Of course he is. He’s the guy who carries and envisions he’s gonna be some hero vigilante when he’s really just a trigger happy misfit itching to shoot someone. Can’t believe he didn’t become a cop himself.
@3VILmonkey Well, my grandfather served and owned a sidearm, he got from a German who didn't need it anymore in southern France in the summer of 1944. But it was more of a showpiece.
Alienated TV I’m not saying it’s bad to own a sidearm. Especially because your grandfather was highly trained by the military so he at least respected it unlike this guy who obviously just wanted to kill someone.
safnhuo Thank you for sharing your story and I’m glad you beat him up. He needed a wake up call. Guys like that drive me absolutely crazy. Sort of like guys like 06hatter who call people names, promote lies about soldiers in YouTube comments and are probably Chinese government finger puppets.
@3VILmonkey lol. We'll put. You said it better than I ever could. I met a hugely overweight, 6'5" diabetes ridden ex-bouncer who "had to" carry for his "protection." Would walk around scanning the area like he was in the middle of a conflict zone. He worked as a mall cop. Absolutely everything was about drama. Dude could make a simple woman shoplifting sound like he was out punching artillery with his bare hands in order to save his platoon. So freaking sadly amusing to watch.
@Angie T grow up. There is no boogie man under your bed called "the government." There are many good people doing everything they can to ensure this nation keeps running smoothly and is safe from predation by enemies, psychopaths and/or liberals.
@06hatter They need to have that in order to break it "properly" and shape it into the much revision needed version of a soldier the U.S. wants for their military.
To clarify, I say "much revision needed" because the type of soldier they cultivate is easily susceptible to becoming the [Complete Obedience] type and or the [Control First] type. There's possibly other types, and let's not even mention the myriad of delusions or warped ways of thinking that can culminate during or after a battle situation.
@3VILmonkey Of course there's a need to protect yourself. It's a dangerous world out there sometimes. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it. I was one of the few women that made 0311. We've seen the shit. Your hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
Natalia Kruschev Congrats on making it to Infantry. I met a female 1st Lieutenant with a Ranger tab a couple of weeks ago at Bragg, btw. Even through her BDUs, I could tell she was cut. I’m sure you’re aware how ridiculously hard Ranger School Is
@3VILmonkey Ranger School is difficult. I heard they lowered standards for some women, and that pissed me off. I had to meet the standards. I earned the right to have my MOS. Good to know there's a few out there who make the cut like they should be.
I wanted to go for Marine Force Recon, but then I got married to my wife and she had our kids through sperm donation, so now I'm just Missus Dad. Gonna be buying the boy his first rifle soon and taking him hunting.
@3VILmonkey Let's hope for two things: They'll be able to Ranger up if the time comes, and that we never get to a point where they need to Ranger up. I've met more anti-war people in the military than I have in civilian life. And that's a good thing. It means we have boots on the ground who are smart. They know when to shake hands and when to pull a trigger.
@Natalia Kruschev This is the cutest fucking story I have ever read in a YouTube comment. You seem like a really good citizen, let alone a good parent. Congratulations on getting where you are now, I know I couldn't do most of what you did.
@Focused Future ROTC is for people who actually want to be in the Army, not for people who like the idea of being in the Army for the sake of boosting their ego
@Aidan Cone yea, that's exactly right. Dudes in rotc are like regular people who just happen to want to be in the military. JROTC people are like the "you're disrespecting a future US army soldier" kid 😂😭
The guy was looking for a fight. It was clearly established this would have been his 5th attempt in so many years of his road rage antics, pulling his gun on people. This time he had the perfect excuse.
It was a bit of a dick move to park in the only disabled parking spot, he shouldn't have got so confrontational towards the mother, the father should not have tried to calm things down by pushing him before talking to him and the guy just took it way too far. This whole thing could have been avoided if everyone involved wasn't petty in their own way. (Of course the defendant was the worse though and it's good he's locked away)
Its easy to be wise after the event. An asshole, an armed asshole at that, was in his own world managing his hatred n venting it upon someone who absent minded but harmlessly parked a car full of her family in a disabled spot among many other empty parking spots. That family was also in its own world, minding their own business n looking after themselves, nobody had any right to interrupt them so its understandable that the father would react physically. Not only is tha world we live in politically charged it is fulla creeps n perverts, any man in any country who reacted the same way would be forgiven for doing so. It was a fucked up situation. Its the price of freedom. Tragic events n misunderstandings happen.
The parking lot was all but empty, the parking spaces beside the disabled space were just as advantageous to anyone needing a disabled place, nobody deserved to be interrogated by an armed psycho imitating a police officer let alone gunned down in front of their children because of it. Also the video stated that the disabled space isnt clearly marked. The driver was in the car, I assume if a disabled persons car pulled up needing the space & it was explained to the parked driver that she would have moved, at the very least she would deserve to be asked before justifying the killing of her children's father in front of them just because she parked in a vaguely marked disabled space.
@Zeon Eons This is why diversity doesn't work in my opinion. Different people have different genetics. White societies are high trust. They get pissed when you break the law. This high trust is what keeps the value of all white neighborhoods so high, clean, and quiet. African societies do whatever they want. Survival of the fittest. This is a clash. It doesn't work. The African clearly had a melt down over being confronted for doing something he was not supposed to do. Africans believe in "mind your own business" "or else". Diversity is a failure.
@Zeon Eons Everybody involved should have handled it better. Baby mama couldn't be bothered to park legally. And she let a disagreement over her shit parking turn into an argument and eventually get the police and morgue involved. Baby daddy saw an argument and let that be his excuse to escalate to violence. Nobody had touched anybody else till he stormed out and made things physical. Now she's a single mom and he's worm food. And our guy here in the video, he made somebody else's crappy parking job his business, let it turn into an argument that turned physical, and ended up in the slammer for it.
@giantpune If only he hadn't parked face forward in an illegal parking spot himself. If only he hadn't gone and confronted the passenger, once he noticed her in the car with her kids. If only he hadn't been looking for an excuse that day to finally pull the trigger. His 4 other attempts had failed in escalation over the years. The guy is now jail bait and ripe for the picking. 20 years to think of his wrongful choice to fire his weapon.
@Zeon Eons I'm not disagreeing that this guy was just waiting for something like this to happen. My point was that everybody involved acted with their ego instead of thinking. They all 3 wanted to be right and assert their dominance. Police the parking lot, park wherever the hell they want, pick a fight with strangers, push over strangers. And all 3 of them lost a lot that day. We can acknowledge and learn something from all of their mistakes. If any one of them would have acted like a grownup that day, they all 3 would have gone home.
@giantpune Hindsight is a wonderful thing. So is the human condition. What if buts and maybes play second fiddle to the reality now. As soon as he pulled his gun out he had time to stop. He didn't. That's where he lost any sympathy and a court defense.
@Zeon Eons Its reality for them now. The rest of us watching at home can learn from their mistakes. I'm not suggesting any of them can do squat about it now. But maybe it helps somebody else see what can happen when you act as stupid as they did that day. They let some trivial little thing escalate and snowball and it ended up hurting everybody.
@giantpune People won't learn from this though. Some will react in all sorts of ways. Some hate confrontation regardless. Unless they are good at suppressing their anger. If someone was hanging around my family like that, i'd be pretty fucked off myself. Would i be more wary now after watching that incident? Yes, but in a couple of weeks i'd forget all about it if i was in a similar situation. I am not saying he was right to shove a guy to the ground but the reaction that followed was extreme violence that the shooter could have easily avoided IF he chose to do so.
You definitely have a point no ones blameless in any of this and lessons can be learned on both sides. Dont park in handicap spaces, Dont play cop, Dont shove someone before even exchanging words with them, and finally Dont shoot an attacker that is clearly backing away which now neutralizes the immediate threat. It was the perfect storm an angry gun toting vigilante meets hot headed father. No one wins.
@Zeon Eons But people are unpredictable... obviously shooting him in the chest is a massive overreaction. but had he simply walked in front of him and said: "what the hell man?" then he would still be breathing today. The best way to get out of a dangerous situation is to not be in the situation in the first place.
@Trusspike15 That would mean something but given his previous history (4 attempts pulling his gun on people, including a young mother) the argument would have escalated. This still comes back to the time he pulled his gun out and paused for 2.5 secs. While all this time observing the other guys actions. Which was one to flee. He shot him regardless. People may be unpredictable but I don't hear of many people dying in car parks cos some random person decided to be a traffic warden. You can say it's an overreaction but he fully intended to kill him.
@Caleb There is plenty of data and evidence but it is all suppressed because it will destroy the narrative of being able to weaponize them to create social chaos, to usher in the new world order. Ever hear of "The Father of DNA" you know the nobel prize winner. Expert in real science DNA. Well he disagrees with with you with facts and data, MRIs', measurements of grey matter. The "problem" is not that they are differences. the "problem" is in denying it because it prevents us from being able to have open dialog to develop solutions. Lookup James Watson, discoverer of the double-helix. When you get beyond the millennial cultural marxism and dig down into the science come chat. People are different and that's fine. It's not fine when problems are not addressed.
all over something so petty too. it’s wicked. i saw my fathers body the night he died n never got the imagine out of my head. can’t imagine how much worse that would be if it had been murder. those children will NEVER forget that shit and the man responsible aint even sorry
@andoy gump If they wrre all under the age of 6, then maybe.. But it can still cause underlying mental issues even if they dint remember what happened.
@Morgan Freeman Yea nevermind that he saw the gunshot, his father fall unconscious in front of him as he bled out, none of that counts towards trauma 🙄
@Razor Gray Listen Mr. Razor, .. did you talk to the kid? Do you know if he knew or not? I didn’t think so, I’m just stating facts and it looks like a weeberboi like u isn’t liking it
@Morgan Freeman im a women so miss and tf you on about, im saying kids CAN remember that shit and unless you are that kid you cant speak for him its that simple, litrally says he collapsed infront of his childs face
@Morgan Freeman I don't think you understand that if someone collapses in front of someone covered in blood and his motionless they look dead I've witnessed it
I feel for that child. I was 12 when I saw my 4 year old brother get run over by a truck and saw his body all the blood etc. I'm now 30 and there is not a day I don't think about it and see the imagine clear as day. The kid will remember that unfortunately 😔
@sophiaa Stop spamming your link...nobody cares and if you insist on continuing to do so. At least have the balls to turn on comments so people can tell you how they really feel.
@Emily Gendreau I have a very strong memory of something for the last time over 25 years later. I was only 3 years old but I remember the back seat of the cop car. I remember the blood. The bits of teeth. I dont think that goes away.
@Tsunayoshi Sawada Yup the lesson to be learned here is dont randomly assault people over words because you never know what kind of crazy ur fuckin with. He didnt deserve to get shot over this but the rule is play stupid games win stupid prizes, unfortunately this guy won the jackpot of that game life over.
Imagine pushing an adult to the ground like some child. Who knows what that man could’ve done if he was willing to physically shove a person down over a parking altercation. Both sides acted idiotic and an idiotic outcome occurred
@SOLOWECR while I agree that the dad could have asked first what was happening, this man was harassing his wife . You don’t know wtf that guys up to. If I saw someone harassing my partner I would be ready to protect them. A shove doesn’t justify murder to any degree and trying to equate them is absolute bs.
I don’t own a gun but my brother and dad are huge gun nuts but they’re VERY vocal about gun safety first and trigger discipline. Shooting should not have been the immediate response. Honestly this guys biggest fault was irresponsible use of a gun.
@Athena Familar no his fault is walking up on someone and made a huge issue of something that wasnt his fight. Nothing would have happened if he would have just went about his day and this is coming from someone that is disabled AND carries a firearm. What got him convicted was how he told misinformation after that fact. Depending on how he told his story or shut his mouth lawyered up and if he had said I was in the fear of my life after a violent push, things might have gone different. Of course the case went nuclear and into orbit based on how present day is when a white guy shoots someone.
@Justin Ferguson really? Because it looks like they're pretty interchangeable.
I think we've established you shouldn't go around shoving people (not tackling, like this fool suggests. Where tf did this guy play football?). But when there's an imminent potential threat to your (wife/gf) AND your young children, you can see why things escalated. It doesn't justify a shove, but let's say husband/bf doesn't quite make it outside: now let's say gf/ wife was as confrontational as shooter suggests, after all she did get out of her vehicle. So if things had gone another way, what if gf/ wife were to be the pusher? Who's to say shooter wouldn't have popped her? With the benefit of hindsight, it seems reasonable to suggest, especially considering shooter's history, that he was waiting to use his firearm. It seemed to be the only reason he had confidence aggressively addressing someone about a goddamn parking spot at "HIS STORE." Obviously husband/bf wasn't privy to all this info, but again coming into a situation where your significant other, and by default your children, is being confronted by someone who clearly sees themselves as at the very least equal to law enforcement, including packing heat, you can see why bf/ husband responded. Not that it was the smartest maneuver, but pretending a shove that led to a scraped elbow and a point blank shot that led to a death are equal (cause some ppl still believe in eye for an eye) is ludicrous. Prosecution spelled it out perfectly, and y'all still confused.
@Athena Familar how was he harassing? The father didn't know what was going on, his wife could have done something seriously bad and he would still have assumed her innocence. He attacked the man without absolutely any reason in a really agressive way, it's obvious he would have continued if the guy didn't pull his gun. While I think the shot was unnecessary and this guy knows it too, I understand where he's coming from.
3 likes
Salt snorter2021-06-04 21:30:18 (edited 2021-06-04 21:34:52 )
@Kratos510e still he shouldn’t have shot him just because he pushed him. The only time it’s justified to shoot someone is if your life is literally in danger and it wasn’t just “a women” that was his wife and his kids were in the car
@Hannes_MLBX it is as the point they made in the video. He was doing this activity knowing that it may lead to confrontation. It was none of his business to go up to the person in her car. If he had an issue he could have told the store manager to deal with the situation. Also I don’t know where you get the impression he would have continued. He already shoved him to the ground, dad wasn’t looking to pummel the guy
@Peter Vansan The cop screamed at a woman over a parking spot and shot her husband over a shove, but yeah, the victim was the crazy one. The fact people like you can drive and vote is the reason why our country is doomed to always be the laughing stock of the world
@Dr. Vedlkin Lmao “blindsiding”. He shoved him and then immediately backed up, he didn’t have a weapon and he certainly wasn’t out to fight the man. The fact that you jump to such manipulative and emotive language to try and label the victim of murder as responsible for their own death makes it clear that you are not defending the shooter out of any sense of moral character
@Athena Familar Yes I also absolutely agree with that point, something like that should be such a minor altercation with civilised people, but yeah you never know (for both sides). And if somebody attacks you that hard from a blind spot with absolutely no other reason but blind aggression, then it's only reasonable to assume he will continue. There's been many cases like that and I have experience too.
@Dr. Vedlkin yes, but this also doesnt excuse Michael Drejka of taking LARPing as a meter maid too far. But the woman was wrong to argue about it, the guy who died was wrong to physically Assault someone, and Michael was wrong for shooting someone retreating.
Only Michael and the mother get to live with those mistakes though.
@Gachabrain interesting. I didn’t say anything about right wing in this comment. I said “next he gonna say this definition came from the media” which can be said from both, but is more used by the right wing side I can agree.
He said it wasn’t point blank. The next person put a definition of it under, showing it’s wrong. I made a joke about it and now you’re accusing me of shit lol
@Gachabrain replying to ur next comment: again, from a different perspective, most people find this pretty justified as what’s going on constitutes it in many’s minds. You’re right, he shouldn’t have pushed him, but that certainly is a viable reaction to finding someone POTENTIALLY (from his perspective) threatening or getting ready to cause harm to the people you love the most. Unfortunately we don’t know what went thru his head at that exact moment but I can say he did a wrong for the right reason, which is certainly justifiable in my and many’s opinions, but to each their own.
@Kratos510e imagine being cold blooded enough to shoot a man in the stomach because he shoved you because YOU started unnecessary conflict. After the "assaulter" stepped back.
@Kingof Grim you'll beat the shit out of someone for them asking you to free a handicap spot you have no right being in? Disregard this case and who sounds ignorant now...
@❤️🔥 yes this is true but shoving someone to the ground for asking someone to move out of a spot they had no right or need to be in is unjustified as well
@Kingof Grim it's called diffusing a situation...its what more intelligent people do; however, if you're parked in a handicap spot, and your wife is a chicken head squacking...chances are the husband isn't too bright either.I guess grandma has one less mouth to feed at her house.
@Joshita it took more than a dozen comments...but there it is! You won the 'call someone a waycist prize!' Race card co,ment officially pulled people. 1st place goes to....
@destrocrimson bet you’ve pushed someone before. also bet you’ve started a fight before. yet still blaming the dead man 😞 what is wrong with you? do you actually think that mans actions justified murder in front of his family?
@stephen shivery and also still, ur talking about a family parked in a handicap space for a few minutes. Was it right? Not exactly Does it effect absolutely anyone? 99/100 times no. And I’m sure if a handicapped person came by they’d move but i digress
@SOLOWECR ones a physical confrontation of the lowest caliber. Yeah starting a physical confrontation is not good, but all he literally did was push him over, that's something a fucking primary schooler does, worst case this guy gets a bruise. His response was to reveal a gun and then start shooting, not even showing it as a threat, he goes trigger happy. One was slightly stupid but understandable, the other was absolutely fucking nutty and not understandable in the slightest
@Kingof Grim "🐑 i swear you people will let the media tell you anything these days. hell i bet you think gay people should be allowed to live too dontcha ya communist"
@HLLDY not all of us are weak beta soyboys who won't fight for a loved one being screamed at by a complete stranger. If someone screamed at my mom, I sure as hell would have pushed him too.
cant say i feel bad for him. he knew wtf he was doing at every step of that situation. sure he didnt start yelling at her because he was looking for a reason to kill somebody, but he was 100% looking for trouble and couldnt wait to have a situation that he could reasonably claim that pulling his gun and firing was within his rights.
It’s amazing all of you knew what his motivations were. Y’all should have been at the trial to testify and let the court benefit from your super powers.
@FullMetal_ You don't go park on a disabled spot when you're not disabled either, nor make a big stink when someone verbally expresses their objections too that, nor push that person over because of it. But he shouldn't have shot him.
I agree. Most people would devastated if they discovered they had taken another human life, even if they felt it was in self defence. Especially if you killed a man in front of his wife and children.
@Dirk Gently You have no idea how the man in this video was speaking to the woman? He could have been incredibly rude, even violent.. Maybe the victim's behaviour was warranted? The whole basis of your point is questionable. The man in this video is most likely one of those closest racists too. Just waiting for an opportunity to shoot a black man. You have to be so weak to shoot someone over being shoved over.
@Dirk Gently being pushed to the ground does not warrant lethal force, his life wasn't in danger and the man was backing up. Thats why that lowlife is convicted with manslaughter.
Notice that, even in hearing that he'd killed Markeis, he managed to cast himself as the victim with the "Thank you for telling me, no one else would tell me".
@James Snow 1) being rude doesn't justify a blindsided assault with lethal force. 2) Show us in the video where the shooter was being violent the woman who had committed typical black scofflaw behavior by parking in the handicapped spot.
The basis of MY point is right there in the video and the police report. YOUR point is on the top of your head.
@Mongo Del Lango And if you DON'T KNOW, you thereby have reasonable doubt, and must vote to acquit the shooter. OJ Simpson was CORRECTLY acquitted because the LA Police themselves had introduced reasonable doubt into the case by being unable to account for over a quart of blood. With a quart of their blood, I can make ANYBODY look guilty, even if they were documented to be living on the other side of the planet at the time.
@Mongo Del Lango It's very easy to see that the man was stepping away when seen from where the camera is located. However, when you're on the ground, and focussing on the front sight post of your weapon, and trying to get the proper sight picture -- aligning the fuzzy image of the rear sight with the sharp image of your front sight and overlaid on the even fuzzier shadow of your target, you don't notice movement towards you on the level of a couple steps towards or from you. Add in a HUGE adrenalin dump, which, among other things, causes tunnel vision, and you're unaware of target motion, unless it's lateral or vertical (forcing you to swing the weapon to keep it aimed at the target).
The prosecutor also made a big deal of the fact that the shooter hit his target center of mass, and not "in the arm, or in the ankle" -- well, yeah, his target was less than 10 feet away. If his aim was so bad at that distance that he would hit his target in the foot, he wouldn't even qualify for a concealed carry permit (states want concealed carry holders to HIT THEIR TARGET, not people or things downrange past the target).
What you do know is that your head is only a foot above the payment, and is an EXCEEDINGLY easy target if the man who just pushed you down no wants to double-down and try to remove your head from your shoulders with a kick. In that position, one kick to the head could very easily be lethal.
I think what really got him wasn't so much what happened that day, but that he had brandished his weapon in 4 previous altercations in traffic. If it hadn't been for that, the cops would have said, "hands down good shoot" and told the prosecutor he would be nuts to waste the taxpayer's time and money trying the case. It's those OTHER 4 incidences (which probably weren't admissable in court as evidence, but nevertheless, would provide motivation the cops and prosecutor) which drove this case into the courtroom. Prosecution wisely chose to prosecute for manslaughter rather than 2nd degree murder, because they never would have got a conviction on Murder-2.
I think JCS said in one of his police interrogation videos that some suspects just don’t show any emotion until after the fact, just like for example if someone’s mother dies some people cry immediately don’t some don’t, you’re not a murder you just behave differently.
@Dirk Gently key word there being 'could have'. More people are killed by guns than by a damn pavement. I've hit a concrete floor before (attacked etc) and i am still alive. I also know others who have too. I'm not excusing the guys actions. It's not good to shove people to the floor, I understand that and agree. I'd always be for talking things through with people as a first resort, before resulting to further actions. However the comment, we are all replying to here, isn't about what he did, its about how he was completely emotionless to finding out he'd killed the guy over LITERALLY a bloody shove. He didn't stab him, he didn't pull a gun on him, he didn't fucking kick or do anything to him yet, other than pushing him to the ground after he was making such a scene with his wife (enough for him to hear, from within the store, and come out to see what was happening). And yes he MAY have ended up hurting him more, who knows, it never happened. But being hurt by someone still does not justify death. No sane minded person would be all 'ah okay, ah well, serves him right for pushing me'. only people void of empathy it seems.
@Dirk Gently 'Typical black scofflaw behaviour' That speaks volumes on you as a person. What a wonderful person you must be. Clearly an asset to society.
I think it’s part of their training; make the suspect sooo comfortable in the hopes they might get something out of his mouth. Imagine if they were rude from the very start causing him to fully shut himself down, saying only “i need a lawyer”.
I’m not saying your mother tongue isn’t English, nor that you didn’t communicate perfectly clearly, I was solely throwing that out as a general consensus btw I totally agree with your sentiment lawl!
1. Matching DNA from the crime scene and from the weapon fired. 2. For future reference if he ever commits a crime if he was let go due to a technicality or mistrial or on appeal or any of the other thousand loopholes in the American justice system.
I love how JCS's videos just end with the final facts of the case. It's tempting to implore others to "Like and Subscribe" and "Hit the Bell", etc. but ending videos this way seems much more professional and leaves you with a better impression at the end.
Wow. I would have never expected that (the verdict). Sad. Your ability to positively assess a situation like this while you’re in it is impossible, same w/ recounting it afterwards. He really goes to jail for what he did… scary. Are we supposed to wait till after we received the second blow before we self defend and are we supposed to have abilities not possible for a human to possess in regards to positively access a situation while we are in it
It's sickening how ready he was to take someone's life over the dumbest shit. I mean it's really disgusting. The man was not armed, and he stepped away when he saw the gun. There was no justification for shooting him at that point. I just don't understand how people do it. They must be wired completely different than me. This guy is what's wrong with America
Exactly, it seems that he shot him as a sort of revenge for being pushed instead of defending himself. How entitled do you have to be to shoot someone for pissing you off
Edit: The guy I responded to deleted his racist comments! I wasn't ranting over nothing lmao. Don't come for me!!!
Shut up dude. This guy, knowing he was armed and looking for trouble, instigated a fight over a parking spot, and then pulled out his gun at the first instance he possibly could and murdered someone on the spot. But somehow, the black guy is the 'impulsive buffoon' in the situation? That guy got 20 years in jail for what he did, because his actions were not justified. You are blatantly ignorant and racist, and you choose to ignore the reality that the color of your skin does not determine your choices. I am African American by the way, and I have never gotten into a physical altercation in my life. I can hardly fathom the idea of physically assaulting someone, let alone murdering them. It is not in my genes to do anything other than be human. You comment was really unnecessary
@kit fisto >black guy was impulsive for shoving man violently arguing with his wife >white guy pulls out gun over impulse decision from being pushed hm
@kit fisto Thank you for admitting that he wasn't justified in shooting him. You could have just said that without adding the ridiculously unnecessary racism, but okay. Have a great day
@Cheong-San The Baddest Or you know, they were both in the wrong? Take race out of it for a second. One of them is definitely more in the wrong and a horrible person but there were two in this ugly dance. You don't put your hands on someone else at the least because you don't know how they'll react or what they'll do. It doesn't have to be a gun right in the moment, people can seek vengeance for what you thought was the smallest of transgressions.
@Cheong-San The Baddest you dont why he shot him, personally i would’ve been very angry if someone pushed me to the ground and stood over me. on the other hand i wouldnt argue with a female over a parking spot thats why its so hard to understand what hes thinking. he seems to be trying to get revenge for being pushed and shooting just because he has the shot, hes wrong. but i understand why hes angry.
@RunTheFade so you would've shot a person dead because they shoved you to the ground and you got angry? If you can't control yourself when you get angry you shouldn't own a gun.
@RunTheFade so you would've shot a person dead because they shoved you to the ground and you got angry? If you can't control yourself when you get angry you shouldn't own a gun.
@Andrew Francis Especially when he was the one who provoked the entire incident. If he had minded his own business in the first place, none of this would have happened.
Bruh handicap spot or not, you approach my vehicle, or my significant other’s vehicle, in a confrontational manner like that and start shouting in her face, that shove to the ground is the minimum that’s justified dude. If you can’t see that than you can’t be helped
Let me be clear, the overwhelming majority of Europeans are just disgusted with the american gun culture! And I mean disgusted to the core of our beings. Nowadays you have more racist Nazis over there than Germany ever had and it is popular with about half of your population. It makes me happy, that in this case the perpetrator got 20 years in prison and hopefully he will get into more trouble there so he will never get back on the streets, because he does not belong there. He did this in cold blood in front of the family of the victim. He shot the father and protector of those kids in front of their eyes. Yes, the victim pushed him to the ground, but he was harassing his wife and kids and that is what protective men do, if they perceive you as a thread to their family. If the victim family would have been white and the shooter would have been black, he would have gotten life without parole! That is what is so fundamentally wrong with America. I just hate that culture so much, that I will never visit that country in my lifetime...
Well I am not making a comparison but this logic also holds true for Markeis as well . There was absolutely no reason to physically assault a person when all he was doing was having a verbal altercation . Lets remember that if anger can make you violent enough to hit a person then anger can also have an effect on the other party as well and you never know the degree of that effect .
@Death2Boredom The person I was responding to (kit fisto) deleted their first 2 comments, which said something like, "The black man was unable to think rationally because he is an impulsive buffoon, not surprising because of his skin color". So what he said was very racist, I responded to that. I don't think any of them were right in this situation
@Brandon Driver I'm referring to the unnecessary altercation that HE himself created. Oh, so HE'S scared, after starting a fight with someone (with the knowledge that he was carrying) luckily for him, someone pushed him, so it was his time to murder them! The opportunity he's been waiting for his whole life. Yeah, it's fucking dumb
@murderbits Everyone saw the video. The victim pushed him (aware from the car containing his wife and kid) before backing away. No one was "baring down on him." 24:12 the officer even says as much.
You literally sound as hysterical as the P.O.S shooter. What kills me is how you seem to think you're coming across as nuanced and it reeks of enlightened centrist who's proudly neutral on whether or not someone should have died over a parking spot. This psuedo intellectualism is more frustrating to me than trolls or out and out racists.
Yes but also maybe don't park in a handicapped spot. Also don't shove someone if they are just arguing. I'm not saying he isn't guilty, but verbal assault doesn't justify physical assault.
3 likes
T *Time2021-05-31 17:42:52 (edited 2021-05-31 17:43:58 )
This guy has created so many scenarios in his head before this incident. He wanted something like this to happen to justify killing someone to "defend" himself.
To be fair, I've never met a guy who doesn't have these fantasies, they just never accelerate these scenarios. That's the difference. Why make a situation more hostile than necessary
Maybe that is true, but push any stranger onto the ground in public and you should know you just created the chance you may be dead in the next few seconds. That's just life. Don't be stupid people. Buddy didn't need to shoot him, but get physical with anyone, you just increased your probability of dieing. When you have kids, you dont do that.
@Sean Winters Fantasize? Hell no I've never fantasized about killing anyone. Maybe you should look up the definition of that word -- "indulge in daydreaming about something desired". Maybe everyone has thought about such a situation but it is obvious from his background and prior incidents that he actively desired such a case. No one like that should have access to a firearm, and should probably seek therapy as well.
@Mottbox That's pure ignorance. It's obvious what he did and why he did it. You people tryin to argue his life was in danger are absolutely delusional..
@Sean Winters exactly, even in Michaels own words, he would have no reason to shoot him if he backed up or was stationary. I’m not defending Michael, but I think the man who shoved him over took a very stupid decision and isn’t blameless for what happened. Even though he didn’t deserve it, there’s tapped people out there and I really don’t understand that way of approaching situations.
@Sean Winters Yeah, but while a lot of guys fantasize about being a hero. Not quite as many carry a gun, research exactly what they can get away with and walk around hoping they'll get attacked so they can use it. This is the type of guy who practices 'clearing' his house
Even if it was justified how does he not feel sick knowing he killed someone? Soldiers kill people in war and years later still feel guilty so why isn't he sad?
@donny trumpster 😂😂😂 bro you’re so triggered. He murdered someone, was found guilty, and given 20 years, in one of the most trigger happy backwards states too. Sorry you lose 🤓
@Jenna Mattern All the veterans I know that have issues aren't from killing but the situations surrounding it. Like I know people messed up from watching "their guys" get chewed up by AKs but not be allowed to help because the shots are coming from a school house or not from killing 10+ people over 9 months but the 1 kid that got ran over during an ambush.
@SOAPANDISHESFORSALE LEBANONCANADA I think he understood what happened was bad and negative but I don’t think he believes he was wrong or what he did was wrong. But I do agree with you that he thought he’d get away with it due to his limited understanding of the laws. I think he believed he was within the law to shoot someone in that situation without receiving time.
@No Homo I see your point, but you can't expect everyone to act the way you would. People react to high tension situations differently and some are more protective than others. You can make the argument that shoving the guy harassing your wife was excessive, but we can both agree he didn't deserve to lose his life over some idiot trying to be a tough guy because he had a gun.
@LordBattleSmurf I hope you don’t own a firearm let me break it down for you. You cannot kill someone because they put hands on you, if your life is in danger then you can do what ever it takes to stop the attacker. But physical harm does not relate to life endangerment.
@Michael he was attacked, yes. But this wasn't self defense at all. A warning would have sufficed, and it did suffice as the guy was already backing up. No need to shoot.
@Michael The only one who fought back was the white man and that was after the black man had already surrendered and shot him straight for the heart , not even in the leg He went straight for the kill . There is no buts.
@Sxiller He never surrendered, he stepped by one foot. In most cases, the attacker will run at the guy with the gun anyways. The threat wasn’t eliminated. I guess it’s easy for you to make such a life threatening decision on your armchair as for me, but you don’t know what you would’ve done if you were attacked in that position.
@Michael if your reaction time is as slow as taking 2.5 seconds to shoot, you shouldn't bear a firearm. that was no "heat of the moment" and stop with the bullshit "you dont know what you would have done in that situation" argument.
That's me when I'm actually in (slight) pain, I'm a wimp about the pain until I forget all about it because I get into whatever I'm doing, then I feel a twinge and start wimping out again.
Im a marine and he has no idea about escalation of force.. Once he drew his weapon he should have yelled get back if he kept coming then he could have shot in self defense and in the state of Georgia I dont know about florida because I know they have "stand your ground" but self defense is below the waist.
@Jason Cardwell Yah, Marine here too. Our ROEs are much more strict, even more so than civilian law enforcement. I cringe when I see Police handle a firearm. But even Florida laws you can only use lethal force in self-defense to prevent "grievous bodily harm or death" and being shoved to the ground does not meet that standard.
most...I don't think any lawyer could have helped War Machine. Which is still my favorite JCS video. But your point most certainly stands with the majority. (and now I have I've got a brand new pair of roller skates stuck in my head again)
A "good guy with a gun" doesn't need a lawyer, he's oooobviously the hero in this story so he'll be tucked in bed, fast asleep by the end night, right? 😆
Right? Like I dunno (I‘ve never dealt with police in that kind of way before) but for me in this kind of situation to call a lawyer and keep my mouth shut would be the first thing to do.
You've probably heard this before but narcissists don't think they need any help and are absolutely right in everything they do. It says a lot about his character that he threatened others with a gun.
When my dad shot my uncle (my dad was afraid my uncle was going to hurt us kids at the time [there's a long complicated history between those two that I don't want to get into]), point is, when my dad shot him, he went out to the front yard, sat down and waited for the cops. He admitted everything and cooperated entirely. He also felt really guilty about it despite the fact that it could have been considered justifiable. (Uncle also lived, I don't want to know what my dad would be like if he'd actually killed him).
The fact that he thought it was a justified shooting is kind of scary..like, he's been carrying a gun for years and he felt if he got pushed he should shoot right away.
@Aiea Slippers Very true..I'm sure the man that pushed him liked his chances if their were no gun involved..People should assume the other person is crazy and will shoot. Need to avoid altercations.
Agreed. He decided that he would respond to any altercation with immediate lethal force when he packed it on him. Loaded, in a easily accessible holster, and possibly with the safety off, i might add. Walking through a unfamiliar neighborhood at night, in a high crime area. Then I can understand why you might want a gun. But quickly dropping in at a store he goes to everyday that is right near a main road, near his car, in broad daylight? That's just paranoid. If he goes around harassing a woman in such a aggressive way, it is inevitable that someone might stand up to him, and shove him away. Everything he did was escalating the situation, and he made no effort to find a non-lethal solution. I hope he won't go wandering around freely, pretending to be a cowboy for some time.
@Korey Paul The man with the gun was the one that started it, though. It looked like he may have hurt the woman if nobody intervened. Or at least that would be a reasonable conclusion to come to. Not really self defense if you start and escalate the conflict to something lethal or likely to cause (serious and not exaggerated) injury.
@Geek Freak Your point is spot on and very scary. So you park illegally and approach someone parked illegally, packing a gun just in case you don't get your point across without backlash. Scary.
sure though what's scarier is that so many people like this exist and they all own chl (ccw) and a firearm and have absolutely no clue about force on force interaction or the laws surrounding justifiable force.
He could’ve atleast simply pointed it yes he was pushed / assualted but to point and shoot an unarmed man with his wife and children adjacent to him was just simply wrong. Disgusting this guy even thought he was justified in shooting.
Anton Chigurh asshike😂😂😂and you aren’t wrong it all just depends on the state law. Here in California is very liberal and strict which is why people like to say commiefornia.
Can we talk about the fact the guy walks out of the store, shoves someone so hard they hit the asphalt, without any degree of humanity or what most people would do and ask what's going on and tell the guy he's a pretentious fuck. Dude could have cracked his skull, had underlying health conditions, this could have been manslaughter the opposite direction easily. He shouldn't have shot him and his death is sad for damn sure, I hope his kids get counseling.
Moderndaydrifter92 no shit sherlock dude hit the floor damn hard but to pull out a gun and start shooting? That’s not enough to take another human life especially infront of his wife and kids
Moderndaydrifter92 this is a different scenario. That was his wife and kids that were being harassed. I’d do the same thing without thought if my family was being attacked.
Bro, and with all the advancement we’ll have made by the time he gets out, he’ll be even more dangerous. Good thing ex-cons don’t have the right to carry.
Alysha Jenkinson have a box that says, “How much do you know about guns?” And if you check “I’m an expert,” then you can’t legally sell them the gun lol too cocky
G4H BARRETT eh not really man. Even if he actually legitimately feared for his life...did you not see once he saw the gun he backed off? There was a pause before he shot and you can clearly see the man backing up a few steps before the shot came out. Nothing justified about it
@Corey Ray He wasn't physically attacking anyone. He was being an asshole for sure and most definitely shouldn't have just shot the guy, but the guy just walked up and shoved him without even asking what was going on first. If you wanna fight the guy after that, go ahead, but you never know who you're dealing with. He could have tried to make the guy leave by getting in his face and telling him to fuck off before taking it to violence.
@Geek Freak You can't carry a Glock with the saftey off because Glocks have no external safety. As long as nothing is inside the trigger guard a Glock will never go off.
He should have just pulled his weapon, not fired it. Just the presence should have “deescalated” the altercation especially considering it appears the boyfriend was backing up. It never should have reached this point in the first place but...people be weird
@Lil Asthma Pump Yes. Again, don't put your hands on people. It's that simple. You can not be sure if the person you shove will defend with the same amount of force or excessive force.
@Intrspace No not at all. Innocent people have gone to jail before and will go to jail again. People can legit be framed. People can be in the wrong place at the wrong time. People can be misunderstood and face extremely harsh penalties despite reasonable mitigating circumstances if they don't know how to prove them. Pro tip: Never consent to a field sobriety test even if you are sober. Many sober people fail them and are taken into custody. Always always do a breathalyzer if you are sober. A sobriety test does not prove you are sober, it can only give reason to believe you are under the influence. Similar concept to pleading the 5th and seeking lawyer.
@Intrspace ....ever heard of Rubin "the Hurricane" Carter? He to used to think that only the guilty needed lawyers too. Until he was convicted of a murder he never committed. He served 20 years in prison. You need to read his book The 16th Round.
Yet another example on why you don't talk to the police without a lawyer. Especially when you're innocent. And this man is innocent. More than that - he is the victim. And his lawyer did a bad job. And that's why more and more people are minding their own business and chose not to get involve. And our world and humanity goes to shit. "Divide and conquer."
@Intrspace Nope. An attorney's job is to provide roadblocks for the prosecution to prove that somebody committed a crime, so that we are sure beyond a reasonable doubt that they did it. No problem with an innocent person using that right that is afforded to them to strengthen the argument of the defense.
@Kangoshi The surveillance video, witness accounts and the killer's OWN account disagree with your summation. He is decidedly guilty. You can blame his legal council or anything else, but objective reality demonstrates otherwise. Just curious, what mechanism can we use to delineate your beliefs from delusions? Surely you care whether or not your beliefs comport with reality, right? Can you meet your burden of proof and exonerate him? I guess it's more comfortable for you to accept a grand conspiracy to divide and control the populace (which I'm not saying isn't happening at some levels), which this case somehow plays into, than to accept that this guy is demonstrably guilty as charged. Anyway, do share your independently verified, falsifiable and peer-reviewed evidence for "innocence" as well as your methodology for distinguishing fact from fantasy.
Intrspace Talking to a lawyer is the most important thing if you are innocent. What matters is how 8 to 12 people think about you, and the cops are trained to get you to trip up and accidentally lie. If you’re guilty as hell, it doesn’t matter. If you are innocent you NEED a lawyer.
@Kangoshi Just paraphrase Rick's most succinct piece of data that would exonerate this guy. Also, why hasn't Rick sent his datum to his council to instantiate an appeal?
Mike Jones 1 in 4 or 25% of people that Project Innocence, who had DNA evidence to help prove their innocence were convicted because they didn’t invoke the 5th amendment.
Intrspace Every single person should refuse to speak to a police officer without a lawyer. No matter what, period. There’s a reason you have that right, exercise it. These cops are not your friend, guilty or innocent.
@xebek Too much to "paraphrase". Trained police kill people with lesser justification and they're fine; when you decided to pull the trigger - it's almost impossible to reverse that decision in the next seconds; you don't give statements after an incident because they'll catch you lying, because in your mind you can see things different, like ask 10 witnesses what happened and you'll get 10 different stories; he didn't know if there was another attackers and he had a gun - they could've take it from him and kill him even though they wasn't armed, and there are videos of that, including when a suspect throw a brick at a police officer, took his firearm and killed him; etc. You need to watch many of Rick's videos to understand all of this and more.
1 like
D Po2020-08-05 06:40:12 (edited 2020-08-05 17:11:53 )
@Kangoshi fuck the left, and I don't know you so I don't really think you're racist, but theres no fucking way you can genuinely believe this dude to be innocent lol
Kangoshi what surveillance video did you see because like the narrator even pointed out once a gun was drawn, the man backed away which signaled in body language that he’s not wanting to escalate anymore and not be a threat, even with hands up like as if he’s a cop. Then after backing up with his hands which showed there was not a threat any longer, he still proceeded to pause a moment and shoot him in the chest. That’s innocent, then heelllllll the whole system of people convicted of domestic violence, abuse, or even murder should be let out, cause they probably didn’t have the witnesses, self-admittance, and VIDEO to prove it. 🤷🏻♀️
@Mikayla H He made a decision to shoot as soon as he landed on the ground. And when you make that decision - it's almost impossible to reverse it. He didn't even see the dude took 3 steps back - that's how terrified he was. But sure, it's easy to judge looking at your screen. Watch actual cops - they can tell everything about it. And I don't mean ASP.
@Kangoshi I do understand how cops sometimes react, however:
1) This guy is not a cop. Not all cop killings are justified and this particular civilian's shooting was objectively not justified. 2) Your rationalizations are full of hypotheticals and logical fallacies. 3) Why not present your BEST piece of evidence ("what ifs" and "this is what cops do in some scenarios" aren't substitutes for actual points of data)? Can you demonstrate the shooter perceived more than one assailant or that the one known assailant was advancing on him? 4) Yes or No, was this shooting justified and what standards of evidence did you use to arrive at that conclusion? 5) If standards for lethal force are this low, does this apply to anyone who's been pushed? What about a punch? Bar-fight? Is this the precedent you want to set?
@xebek "Totality of circumstances". At this point let's just agree to disagree and move on. That's why when you did nothing wrong you choose a judge instead of a jury.
@xebek So, I couldn't find Rick's first video, because it's no longer available on youtube - I don't know why. YT probably took it down and Rick doesn't even know that. This is the second part, when he's commenting on the comments on that video. But fear not! Ever since his other channel got deleted without "due process" (wasn't a single strike on that channel) - I'm copying every video he puts up on my hard drive. So I'll upload it to bitchute and post a link. For now search for the "Florida Stand Your Ground Video Discussed & Review Law & Slow Motion Video". I'll put up a link in my next comment, but it might be get scrubbed.
Most people feel theyre less likely to be found guilty if they arent getting a lawyer. In the back of your mind you think that if you ask for a lawyer you seem guilty from the beginning
@Intrspace no, some inocent people fall in this police tactics and "confess" to shit they do not do just to have some relive from the pressure and tension of the room (if u notice even the roms are small and the suspect its put against the wall just for that purpose).
@Vadim VeeVoit Innocent people lawyer up every day. Its innocent until proven guilty, not tell us you're innocent and we'll leave you alone. Even if you're innocent you can still be falsely imprisoned.
@Vadim VeeVoit im not arguing if they do or they dont. Im saying you should always speak to a lawyer first. The reality is people get falsely accused or other avoidable complications can occur. The system isnt perfect, and humans are flawed. It is a valid precaution and a right to speak to a lawyer.
@Intrspace noooooooooo no no no no. believe me it is not. i'm saying this for your own benefit. PLEASE get a lawyer if you are interrogated for a crime.
@Intrspace wrong fully wrong when you’re under investigation they’re going to press you to the maximum and use different strategies to make you look guilty and not everyone is going to be smart enough to protect themselves
The detective, George, was recently arrested for showing up to a crime scene drunk. Doesn’t add anything to the story, just thought it was interesting. Also, this Michael guy is delusional, glad he is serving time.
Finley The Golden dude that’s sad! He was off duty and had four drinks, came to the crime scene at 10:30 pm! He should’ve just said he wasn’t able to come or something :/
What if he was drinking at home before he got called out? How does that usually work? Are they on a shift, or expected to stay sober on call or something?
@Elmo Vanners No one deserves to have their partner and dad murdered. 20 years is kind. He has a second chance at life when he's released when the victim doesn't.
@MRDTH I agree with you but no one should be locked in a cage like they are an animal especially not for the rest of their lives many other countries handle criminals better by actually rehabilitating criminals rather than locking them up in a cage
This was all I was digging through the comments for, thank you!
0 likes
Robin Luv2021-06-03 15:12:23 (edited 2021-06-03 15:13:47 )
@MRDTH Absolutely. He deserves life in prison. You wrongfully take someone else's life (murder) you don't deserve a second lease on life 20 years later. In front of their kids too. Evil!
I think he was trying his best. He is required to do whatever he can to win the case, otherwise it could end in a mistrial. Even the worst person needs their lawyer to do the absolute best to fight for them in order to ensure that the case against them is sound. Numerous bad people have been released or had their cases drawn out needlessly simply due to their lawyer not trying very hard.
@Boanerges57 Well, his job is to give him the best defense possible, not necessarily to win the thing. If your client is caught dead to rights, if you can get him twenty years instead of thirty or the death penalty, you've done a good job.
@Peter Alexander Danneskiold-Samsøe You don't force a client to do anything, you counsel them (hence why lawyers are also call counsellors). At the end of the day, the defense lawyer gets paid either way, so forcing a client to enter a particular plea holds no advantage for the lawyer.
And I never said anything about being righteous or lawful, I just said what the role of a defense lawyer is... That lawyer did his job well because his client was facing a maximum of 30 years and he got him 20 years...
@anddudewaslike It's his job to make the best defense possible, even for the worst people. It doesn't mean he believes or even likes his client, but if bad guys don't get adequate defense then good guys won't either. It's how the system has to be to ensure protection for everybody.
Ah yes a little wave here and there so you can’t see anything clearly. Oh and the color is black and white which makes a large difference as well, he’s innocent
He should be proud. He obtained those skills so thugs don’t get away with attacking him. Even if the black guy wasn’t going to attack him after shoving him so hard he smacked the pavement, you don’t get to just assault someone for a trivial reason as arguing and get away with it. The world would be a lot safer if you assumed you’d get shot for so much as pushing someone
How did he instigate being attacked? I really dont feel telling someone they're illegally in a handicap spot warrants a freak out or especially physical assault. The camera footage shows he never got physical or violent, im having a hard time understanding why the guy is allowed to attack him for speaking?
St. Matthew 7 Judge not, that you may not be judged,
2 For with what judgment you judge, you shall be judged: and with what measure you mete, it shall be measured to you again.
3 And why seest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye; and seest not the beam that is in thy own eye?
4 Or how sayest thou to thy brother: Let me cast the mote out of thy eye; and behold a beam is in thy own eye?
5 Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam in thy own eye, and then shalt thou see to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
6 Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their feet, and turning upon you, they tear you.
7 Ask, and it shall be given you: seek, and you shall find: knock, and it shall be opened to you.
8 For every one that asketh, receiveth: and he that seeketh, findeth: and to him that knocketh, it shall be opened.
9 Or what man is there among you, of whom if his son shall ask bread, will he reach him a stone?
10 Or if he shall ask him a fish, will he reach him a serpent?
11 If you then being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children: how much more will your Lord God, the Father who is in heaven, give good things to them that ask him?
12 All things therefore whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you also to them. For this is the law and the prophets.
13 Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat.
14 How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life: and few there are that find it!
15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
16 By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit.
19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire.
20 Wherefore by their fruits you shall know them.
21 Not every one that saith to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven: but he that doth the will of my Lord God, the Father who is in heaven, he shall enter into the kingdom of heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have not we prophesied in thy name, and cast out devils in thy name, and done many miracles in thy name?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, you that work iniquity.
24 Every one therefore that heareth these my words, and doth them, shall be likened to a wise man that built his house upon a rock,
25 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat upon that house, and it fell not, for it was founded on a rock.
26 And every one that heareth these my words, and doth them not, shall be like a foolish man that built his house upon the sand,
27 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall thereof.
28 And it came to pass when Lord God, the Great King Jesus Christ had fully ended these words, the people were in admiration at his doctrine.
29 For he was teaching them as one having power, and not as the scribes and Pharisees.
Word of the Blessed Lord God, the King. Thank You Blessed Lord God, the King and Savior Jesus Christ.
All you great numerous enemies; the enemy of the holy death of my Lord God, the King and Master Jesus Christ on the Cross of Calvary; the prince of darkness and iniquity, the father of all liars; I stand on the death of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ and offer His pains, wounds, and the Precious Blood of His left hand to the Eternal Father Lord God for your downfall, your destruction and your scourging. Amen. Precious Blood of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ - reign in me and in the lives of all men. Amen.
O holy loving Father, Lord God, the King of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Who protected the Israelites of old in His holy wings in the dryness of the cold and hot desert; I offer You the holy death of my Master and Savior, Jesus Christ, for the protection of Your people who are scattered all over the world. May the Blood and water wash and strengthen, save and cleanse us that we might find home in the Sacred Side of Your Holy Son that opens for all men. Amen. Sacred Side of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - be our home for safety. Amen.
Omnipotent and Omniscient Lord God, the King, Lord God, the King of Elijah and the prophets, look at the Sacred Head of Your only-begotten Holy Son and have mercy. Arise and save Your people. I offer You all the shame, the pains, the wounds and the Precious Blood from the Sacred Head of Your Holy Son for all Your children who are living in these perilous times. Strengthen our true faith through the mockery of Your Holy Son, Lord Jesus Christ, and save us through the Precious Blood from His Sacred Head. May we, through the sufferings of Your Holy Son, Jesus Christ, learn to suffer in You and die in You. Amen. Holy tortures of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - increase our true faith. Amen.
Merciful and holy loving Father Lord God, the King, Your wish is that all men shall be saved. Kindly look on Your rejected and condemned Holy Son Who suffered many tortures and will suffer many through the sins of Your people. Look and see what sin has done to your only-begotten Holy Son. I offer for all Your people who are living in these ungodly and wicked days, all the tortures, pains, rejection and shame of your Son, Lord Jesus Christ, to You, for the true faith to withstand trials and holy patience to withstand long torture. May they through the suffering of Your only Holy Son, fight to the end. Amen. Our Lord God, Jesus Christ the King's torture - increase our true faith. Precious Blood of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - save us. Amen.
You dont go around throwing people on the floor and then step up to them in a threatening manner . He could of easily load out his clip on him but he just shot once. Just like a cop would !
@Dj d I agree there was no need for physical escalation. That wasnt a light push, and pulling the gun probably would be necassary. However, I dont think he needed to shoot, once the gun was drawn the guy backed up. It would be different if the guy kept advancing. No need to shoot.
@Dj d I agree with everything you said. I wasnt trying to disagree with you, just point out that the shooting part was not necessary. N yes all over stupid stuff.
@Dra6onfly let's see how that works out for you ...maybe if he had not pushed him to the floor . He wouldn't have take out his gun and shoot him on the spot . Maybe ! How is that playing hero ? He just wants to have the space reserved for handicap people ...its that so wrong to just asking them to please move ? But people are dumb and have big egos ,so they tend to get offended for everything ,thus he got shot and his wife is a widow and the shooter is in jail ! No one wins because everyone had a huge ego .
I live in this area. This man caused issues at this store constantly. I love how he called it HIS store when the owner of the store loathed whenever he visited and caused issues like this. It was only a matter of time for it to escalate
@Kwon i hope you're being sarcastic.....he pulled his weapon and fired in an instant. No one, with a weapon or not, could have stopped that man from being shot to death. The only thing that could have stopped that was the father choosing to use words instead of physically assaulting the shooter.
@Gordon Zimmerman It seems like the controversy is around whether the shot was justified. The prosecutor says the black guy disengaged the situation and there was no need to shoot.
The other side is once he pulled the gun what else can you really do other than hold him at gunpoint or shoot. If you lower your firearm to disengage what’s stopping the other guy from going to his car and grabbing his piece?
If it wasn’t high profile for the race and 2nd amendment issue. He probably could have gotten a better deal like reckless use of a firearm. He was justified in pulling it out but whether it was the best decision to make is a different story.
@Coyote Rx he was justified in drawing his weapon, but the problem was the actual shooting. In conseled carry classes (at least the one i took) you are taught to draw your weapon at perceived danger, but to confirm the danger before firing. By drawing his weapon and immediately firing, he did not give himself a chance to assess the situation and see that the other guy is backing away.
@Blake Wilson I get that’s the rule but once you have a person at gunpoint what else are you really going to do other than shoot? Backing up doesn’t necessarily mean disengagement. The other guy can back up to their glove box and pull out their piece to retaliate. Would you really give them that opportunity?
If he told the cop he was scared and it was self defended he probably would not be charged with manslaughter. He was aggressively shoved to the ground by a 3rd person during a 2 person verbal confrontation. People have been shot over a toaster on Black Friday sales. The black guy should have approached it better rather than start a N***a moment.
@Coyote Rx Really don't see your point here. Drejka never even gave any opportunity for anything to happen. Backing up is a clear sign of disengagement. What you do after that may change the situation, but the act itself is a sign of disengagement. Drejka had the upperhand in the situation, he could've waited to see what Marques was going to do, but he chose to fire without even looking at his face. I 100% agree that Marques shouldn't have pushed him and that he was justified in pulling his gun. But shooting? No. Drejka was at an advantage when he pulled the gun and he had the time to wait and see what Marques was going to do. Even if Marques chose to keep the confrontation, he needed time to get a weapon, or to approach Drejka to beat him up. Drejka didn't even consider giving him this time, he just shot.
Obs: your statement about the "N word moment" is so racist I had to stop and read it again to make sure someone said such a thing
@Coyote Rx You seem to think that once you pull out a gun, there are only two options: shoot or lower your gun. You could keep your gun on him until he is established to no longer being a danger to you. You could keep your gun on him while you walk back and out of this situation. You could keep your gun on him until the cops arrive. You can't shoot a man based on what you think he might do in the future.
@pepelapiu2004 If he just turned around and shot though he would be justified. The fact that he stopped for a second is what did it. It’s a tough one to call because gun violence is so rampant in today’s society there’s little recourse.
You can keep your gun on him while you walk back and out of the situation. -if you’re standing up yes you can. He was on the ground though that’s considered a disadvantage. You can keep your gun on him until the cops arrive. Someone has to call the cops to begin with. If you’re holding someone at gun point you’re not going to take your eyes off them to unlock your phone dial 911. That’s why cops have radios on their shoulders to call for backup so they can hold up a suspect without taking their eyes off him. You can’t shoot a man based on what you think he may do. No you can’t but once physical aggression has been established that rule kind of flies out the window. The black guy already established he’s willing to cause physical harm over the altercation. It’s not unreasonable at that point to think a person will continue aggression.
There’s many options to what you can do but what you can do and what’s feasible are completely different.
If 2nd amendment issues and race cards weren’t at play this situation would probably be completely different. Manslaughter I feel is justified because shoving him to the ground is engaging in combat. I would personally charge him with reckless use of a fire arm. Based on an apparent previous situations where this guy was waiving his gun at people.
I believe this guy was looking for an excuse to legally shoot someone one day. So he probably was a bit quick to escalate the situation to drawing his gun. However, the black guy took it to the next level by engaging in physical violence. If the white guy had a lawyer with him during questioning. This would definitely had a different outcome.
@Coyote Rx The black guy was clearly stepping back, not forward. It's clear he was not a threat to anyone while stepping backwards. Yes, if you are on a ground, you are at a disadvantage, but not if you have a gun pointed at your assailant.
so, while as the sole caretaker of a disabled parent, it does frustrate me when able bodied people use the handicapped parking because "they'll just be a minute", "real quick in and out", just grabbing a to-go order or picking up their mail, but inevitably they're now an obstacle in a disabled person's ability to freely move about society, and disabled people should never have to beg abled people for their own dignity. but this man isn't disabled, and isn't defending anyone who is. he's a little man with a hero complex who likes waving his gun around to make himself feel like a big tough man who has the right to boss others around. parking in the handicapped parking when you aren't handicapped is not an offense worthy of death. no one in that family deserved to die for any of their actions. that man was clearly riding a holier-than-thou hero complex high and wanted to get revenge like a school yard bully for someone daring to stand up to him and shove his ass to the ground. he deserves every single day of jail time he gets for this senseless, needless, completely avoidable loss of human life. the trauma that now lives in that woman and her children is far worse than anything suffered by a disabled person unable to momentarily use that specific parking spot.
@Jpse Barton a lot of them are, often it's to put them next to a ramp so that wheelchair users can get up the curb but a lot of places don't give a single fuck and just put it wherever they want "out of the way" bc they legally have to have at least one but there is absolutely nothing actually stopping them from making it the most useless parking spot ever, which is another huge problem, but yet another reason why this whole ordeal is so fucking stupid.
67 likes
George Findlay2022-01-03 20:41:46 (edited 2022-01-03 20:42:53 )
If i had my own store and if it was legal to do i would have NO disabled parking area for one it causes waaay to many idiots to act and two it always amazes me when nearly all people just jump out the car and wander around a store for x amount of time so it always makes me think why do they want to park nearer to the store because it makes not a bit of sense ? So if there was no disabled parking area this and many other disputes would never ever happen.
@Moon-Vixen Your original comment on top was perfectly conveyed. I agree with everything you said because that’s exactly what was going through my mind as I started reading the comments. Trust me, it’s not every week that I agree without a reasonable doubt.
The accused did not go to play the hero there. It is just that some people like to play the policeman whenever they see other people breaking the rules. When he first approached the vehicle he just saw a female driver there (did not see the kid behind, the windows were tinted) and he started telling her off maybe in a stern voice. But her reaction to him was more rude than his stern way - and it is certain that she reacted that way because she knew her boyfriend was inside and would come out to protect her. We need to acknowledge her role in this too, she was not OK having parked in the disabled area and then swearing at the man who made a remark. She could de-escalate saying that she did not notice this is a disabled area and that she was OK to change the position of the car and it would had ended all there. Instead she started up a verbal fight with the man. The victim then got out and sneakily pushed the man from behind. This was a vicious move. Yes we can say he was protecting his family there, but to do so would mean to go inbetween the man and the car where his girlfriend was in. The accused was clearly not physically aggressive, only having a verbal fight with his woman. So the victim really escalated it and did so viciously attacking from behind. An attack from behind is particularly vicious in the sense that it can be interpreted as a sign of a will to do far more harm than an attack coming from in front. The victim literally pushed the man, older in age, into the air and fell to the ground. Yes he did a step back but in many fights attackers take a step back only to take more momentum and attack again with kicks nailing the guy to the ground. People have killed other people with kicks to the head in that way. You never know how it will go on.
From the accuser's point of view, taking out the gun was indeed correct, precisely as the prosecution lawyer said in the court. He had the right to do so in this situation. But he had no right to shoot. This is the thing : owning a gun is good... until you have to use it. The devil is in the details. When you use it you are burdened with the need to prove that the circumstances called for the usage of the gun. In this case, one cannot establish that he had to use the gun, even to wound, let alone to kill. The accused pulled the trigger not because he felt the threat was continuous but rather because of the shock he received during his fall. It was more of a tit for tat kind of escalation : the victim escalated by viciously-violently pushing him to the ground, and the accused then went on to escalate more by pulling out his gun and shooting him.
Speaking of the racism connotations here, if one is to use the racist card on the accused, i.e. that he pulled the trigger too easily because the victim was a black guy, he cannot avoid then the same token being used on the victim, i.e. that he went on to escalate and attack in such a vicious manner (and dangerous one - if he fell with the head he could even die, people have died with such falls....), precisely because what he saw there was an older white guy.
@Kat Page lmao sweetie, look at it. he wrote 5 large paragraphs (now edited down to 3) more or less about how he did nothing wrong and didn't deserve his sentence bc it was all her fault and she should have de-escalated the situation by basically groveling at the feet of the random angry white man who approached her car out of nowhere over a crime he too in that moment was guilty of. he's absolutely seething
@Moon-Vixen They didn’t say that he did nothing wrong. Yes, they said that it was not wrong to take out the gun: “taking out the gun was indeed correct,” and “he had the right to do so in this situation”, but they did say it was wrong to shoot; “But he had no right to shoot,” and “one cannot establish that he had to use the gun, even to wound, let alone to kill.”
So it’s clear they directly acknowledged the fact that it was the wrong course of action to shoot at all, regardless of whether the intention was to kill or to injure, so they definitely didn’t suggest that the killer didn’t do anything wrong.
I never detected anger from their reply honestly. None of the language they used emitted anger, and what they said was all simply from an open standpoint. They pointed out the right and wrong in both parties. Just because they recognized that they all did something incorrect doesn’t necessarily mean that they think the girlfriend, victim, and killer were equally all at fault. The wrong of murdering someone far, far outweighs the wrong of using rude language or pushing someone, and nothing they said suggested otherwise.
I just notice that a lot of people sometimes assume that whoever disagrees with them is angry. Or when someone writes a lot of words regarding a sensitive topic, it means they had strong motivation to do so which must have stemmed from anger. Or maybe if you felt anger towards them for pointing out the incorrect actions of the victim and his girlfriend, you automatically read their reply in an angry tone that matched how you felt. I know I do that sometimes.
But the point is, maybe they were in fact angry, but nothing they said actually showed they were angry. Maybe I missed something they said, so if you want to give some pieces of evidence from their text that show they were potentially seething by all means go for it. Or there was something that suggests anger in the deleted paragraphs?
@George Findlay Well then disabled people wouldn’t have a place to park and have room to get out of their car so they can access the store… You’d further disable disabled people by taking away disabled parking areas because of idiots who fight over or take up those spots?
I don’t think he killed him for the parking spot. He argued with the wife over it but when the husband came he shot because he was pushed. I think the parking spot was incidental and it was more that having a gun makes some people like him just itching to use it.
@Dinos And all that stuff you wrote STILL does not justify the crime of shooting a man dead in front of a gas station because he pushed you for harassing his wife and kids. That's the key thing that the separated this from him getting off on Florida's (often stupid, coming from a fellow Floridian) stand your ground laws. The question was never "was he wrong to take out the gun," the question was "was he right to SHOOT AND SHOOT AND KILL SOMEONE."
She was parked in a handicap spot and the rest of that might have occurred, sure, but he literally posed no threat to his life and he decided to take his gun out and fire anyway even though he backed up 3 steps and turned away to walk away. All that stuff you wrote literally DOES NOT MATTER. He diffused the situation when he took out his gun, and he decided to shoot the one shot that ultimately killed him anyway, and for that, he's guilty.
Why did he do it? I don't know. I'm not a professional psychologist. If I had to speculate, I'd say when he took out the firearm, the rush to an untrained person (because let's face it, gun training is not that thorough in this country) was enough to make him see everything in "fast motion." And in that moment of heightened adrenaline that comes from pointing a gun at someone, sure, maybe it seemed like the right thing to do and made it seem like the guy kept coming at him. But that's not reality. In reality, he pulled out the gun, the guy who pushed him took three steps back (WITH HIS HANDS UP, might I add), turned around to walk away, and then he got shot and killed.
The guy who killed him tried to argue the same thing you did. In his paraphrased words, "I don't know what he was going to finish but to me it looked like he was going to finish what he started." And as we can see, in Florida (and even in common sense once you take out your fucking gun and they start backing away with all their body showing signs that they "give up" as the prosecutor said), that is not a justifiable reason to KILL SOMEONE.
"She could have de-escalated by saying she was not aware" or whatever, is not a justifiable reason to take out your gun let alone discharge it and kill someone. Him shoving you to the ground, as the prosecutors acknowledged, is a reasonable cause to reach for your gun. But once he starts backing away three steps with his hands up and turning to walk away, the situation is diffused, and you have NO REASON to fire your gun. And furthermore, why are you only thinking of DREJKA'S perspective in the situation? From the guy who shoved him, all he saw was his wife and kids getting harassed so he got confrontational. Where's the rationalization for him, whose only "crime" was pushing the guy who was yelling at his wife and kids?
No amount of shit you write can justify what he did in taking another person's life who was just trying to buy some shit from the gas station.
@Saito Dosan agreed he had no reason to use the gun. He was not in a right state of mind. Possibly earlier too but certainly after the violent push. A push which was also unwarranted itself. A tragedy altogether for no reason. One man 10 feet under, another in jail for life. For no reason.
@George Findlay I will say, people wouldn’t know I’m disabled if they saw me, because I can walk around and go through stores and stuff, but I’m 100% through the VA for major medical issues, which does have to do with walking a lot and standing for long periods, it’s hard to judge just because someone steps out of a car and walks around. In order for you to even get the handicap plaque you have to get a letter through your doctor. And it’s hard to get one.
@TonksArt I always find it so funny when a "handicapped" person says that they want to be treated like a normal person......until it comes to putting there hand in there pocket...i wish and hope for the day when someone "handicapped" wants to pay normal prices that the able "able bodied" have to pay.
How do you deal with handicapped spot parkers who shouldn't? If they are still present I show my disabled parking placard and they'll usually apologize and drive off to park somewhere else. I've also when the drivers aren't there, approached nearby police officers who would then have these cars towed (meaning the owner will get a fine for illegal parking, and have to pay the towing costs). In other cases I've done what my dad used to do when I was a kid and someone parked at the disabled spot without a placard: deflate the tires of those cars.
The killer is in the wrong for shooting, obviously. But I can't bring myself to sympathize with the victim either considering how often I've had to walk long painful distances with my crutches due to these types.
@moon-Vixen not to mention this specific disabled spot is actually the furthest from the actual door and when he first pulled up every spot in front of the door was available! Plus he told the cops he was coming from WAWA down the road and obviously only stopped because he saw a car in the spot and he wanted to make sure they had a tag! These kind of people are not looking out for people, this kind of person is looking for a confrontation.
@Kat Page at the end of the day killing somebody for pushing you is excessive force which was obviously conveyed during his trial. Michael would’ve never beaten the case seeing as thou his life was never in danger and that he was just scared. When Michael takes his gun out there’s at least 4 feet between him and the victim. Victim slowly starts retreating and yet Michael still sees fit to shoot this man in “fear” of his life. He might as well have had his back turned
"...parking in the handicapped parking when you aren't handicapped is not an offense worthy of death." Agree. The offense was running up to an individual and knocking him to the ground. Drejka definitely escalated things by pulling his gun. Drejka deserves to go to jail. AND people who illegally park in handicapped stalls and refuse to move are still scumbags.
@Alicia Taylor No its just that they want they want to be treated as a "normal" person until it comes to putting there hands in there pockets then they want all the money etc etc
0 likes
The Road To Mars2021-12-29 19:20:24 (edited 2022-03-20 12:19:39 )
I like how the cop asked him “do you think you could have taken him in a fair fight?” …(that was brilliant). By asking the question the officer revealed just how faint hearted (a coward) this guy is.
I'm sure it would've been a brilliant question to ask Marquis too, considering he blindsided someone who clearly wouldn't have stood a chance of fighting back.
@J3 Omega idk man. What if that was your girl? Idk how you feel about a man getting up in your girls face and yelling at her. If it were me I would have acted very similar. I guess I am more of the protective type but i mean that man wasnt just close to her he was close and I would not wait for him to get any closer before putting myself between him and my girl or pushing him away. Maybe not as hard as he did but adrenaline is a hell of a drug. And with the only context being this crazy man up in your girls face and yelling saying god knows what you better believe I'm intervening and putting him in his place. Just a slight shove to create distance or just grab him by the shoulders while talking to him. Anything to make sure he can not harm my woman. But thats just my take on it.
I dont think it was meant to show him as coward, i think it was meant as to show if there was any other option. If Drejka would answer "yes" to that question it would show that he could defend himself fighting instead of shooting. Answer "no" was the right one in term of his defense but not the answer cop was looking for. What do the cop care if he is a coward or not.
@J3 Omega wow, you need a lot of attention. A review of your channel is a real eye opener to your motives for comments on this video. I like how many vids in your playlist mention the N word. Real classy. #racist#racistpos
Let me explain the question of "do you think you could have taken him in a fair fight?" since some people got side tracked or uptight in their own pity issues.
It is not a fair fight if you are trying to fight someone with your fists and the other person draws a gun. That is a very unfair fight since they have more range, can inflict greater damage, and be very safe while doing it all. It is still an unfair fight if someone brings a knife since it can do greater damage as well despite the closer range.
By asking him if he thinks he could have taken him in a fair fight was to see if he could handle himself without a gun or any other weapon. If someone says yes than they answered the weapon wasn't needed. These questions are about the contents of the situation and the answer of the person in question. It really speaks out, when looked further into, their mindset.
Really that is all there is, by saying it was pointless just tells us that you would be clueless on how to interrogate someone. It is okay to not know how and to blindly suggest otherwise, but not so great if you keep up a pointless act and show everyone you have so much free time to stalk down a post you made a month ago to "defend" yourself by attacking everyone else. Just put the gun down.
@Aljoša P I think there was an argument there either way. I agree if he said yes then what you said would be the argument by the prosecution. Since he said no, I think they were showing that the only reason he decided to approach the situation was that could become physical was because he had a firearm on him. He was confident because he had a gun. He wouldn’t have even tried to find another way out of this confrontation other than shooting an unarmed man.
The whole concept of a fair fight is non-existent here. If he hadn't carried a gun, the fight would also not have been fair, because physically the black dude completely outclassed him, and clearly bullied him. And before you put words in my mouth, although the dad was acting despicably, the shooter was obviously far more despicable in shooting the man as he backed off and robbing him unfairly of his life.
@Johnny Natrium careful there, my dude. With sound logic like that, you're bound to get called racist by fragile, ignorant hypocrites with no actual argument.
@nebula donuts He did what he had to do protecting his wife from someone arguing with her by assaulting that person? How do you not get how silly and hypocritical it is trying to justify Markeis's foolish escalation of the situation while lambasting Michael's foolish escalation of the situation? Michael shouldn't have shot Markeis, and he should go to jail for killing him, but Markeis shouldn't have assaulted Michael, and he shouldn't be treated as if he was right for doing so.
Also, you want to talk about acting like the guy in the video, when his argument for the entire video sounds a lot like the one you're making for Markeis. "He was protecting h̶i̶s̶ ̶w̶i̶f̶e̶ himself, who probably wouldn't h̶o̶l̶d̶ ̶a̶ ̶f̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ shoot at him. He did what he had to do." Who acts like who again? Go do some critical thinking bro.
@Killer Macchiato What if that was your girl? Idk how you feel about a man getting up in your girls face and yelling at her.
It doesn't matter how people feel. Emotional reactions are by definition irrational. And you just told us that you would overreact to a verbal altercation between two outside parties. It'd be one thing if Marquis walked out to find Drejka actually physically assaulting his girl. That'd be a very different scenario. And surely we can both agree that Drejka was in the wrong, but blindsiding someone violently who has not physically attacked you or your significant other is very abnormal behavior. It's an escalation.
Ultimately, this all occurred because Michael Drejka thought it was his job to make sure people parking in handicapped spots had placards - something I don't think he should have been doing btw. But the pusher escalated, and so did the shooter, and BTW both were wrong. This is what happens when two adults act without thinking.
@Killer Macchiato sounds like a good way to get shot or stabbed. you can defend by inserting yourself in between, and asking the guy to step back from a person or a car, ask the girl to step away. if he follows her then that can be threatening. even just holding someone in place can be perceived as a threat as there's obviously 2 choices, talk or strike. and no adult beging held by a stranger expects a conversation
It’s interesting how much he stressed that he’s never been a fighter. Anybody that’s been in a fight would know how to avoid starting one.
Puppies learn how to play safely by playing unsafely, and learning to stop when that violence causes someone else pain (biting too hard gets a yip and ends the fun). They learn, while too weak to do any real damage, where the boundaries are.
Drejka thought he was portraying himself as a gentle person. All he did is show he has no idea how to respond to a little violence. Anybody that’s been in a fight would have taken that push, then seen Marquis back up, and know that no more harm was coming. But Drejka didn’t understand that, and escalated things even more.
Truth. The other thing he could have done if he suspected he was getting a whooping would be to simply draw the weapon snd back off. Or even fire over his head. I can’t say just how lucky I feel that in my. Country, even criminals don’t regularly use guns snd I don’t have to worry in every argument there’s someone like this ready and willing to use a gun.
@rafer Jefferson iii I’ll mostly agree, except people absolutely should NOT fire warning shots. You might as well blindfold yourself, spin around and fire randomly.
@Gifted Fox cases like Drejka’s are extremely rare. It’s not wannabe heroes that make the streets dangerous, especially if they get even the slightest bit of training.
Most gun owners aren’t wannabe heroes, scouring dark alleys for an excuse to kill a would-be robber. They’re just normal people that want to be prepared for an extreme situation, and are smart enough to avoid those situations entirely when possible.
Edit: also, why are you using weapon and gun as synonyms? Knives, bats, rocks and basically anything can be a weapon. It’s not about the tool, it’s about the user.
@GP well at least where I live the threat of a bear attack is bigger than the threat of being shot because the gun owners around here know how to be responsible So at the very least I think gun control should be determined by the local government
This guy is the type that has been waiting to inflict violence upon a person. The just give me a reason type of guy. His moral compass is clearly faulty. To feel justified about murdering man over a parking verified that. Wouldn't be surprised if he has a hero complex as well. Bet he wasn't counting on that security camera disproving his story. Good thing it was there or he would have probably got away with it.
From the video alone this was completely unjustified.. he wasn't in fear for his life for even a second, just indignant at being put in his place by a black man for harassing someone. My own personal views aside that kind of behaviour is unacceptable.
The prosecution hit the nail on the head in its arguments. I was nodding along with every point made. Where as the defense was as dumb as Michael himself. They had no leg to stand on. Video evidence case closed!! Just leave people alone.
Remember when you were a kid and someone pushed another kid on the playground? You’d think an adult could do the same as kids and get up and go tell an adult (because he clearly wasn’t one)
He's the type of guy to say "I would have joined the military but I would have knocked the drill instructor out" and own at least 2 dozen Tapout shirts.
His attorney probably told him to plead guilty but the guy is so self centred he refused to, nothing the attorney can do there but give the best defence possible, but there was no good self defence
Initiates a confrontation over the pettiest of issues, gets shoved down, draws, no warning, hesitates, fires at least one shot at the retreating target- with an occupied public building as his backstop. He can't even claim self-defense at the very last second, because the dude was 100% retreating and in defensive posture when he shot him.
As a firearms enthusiast and studier of conflict for many years, my assumption here is that this is the scared white bully situation. He probably bullies all races, but he was extra-scared by the sudden escalation from the young black male in the middle of his bullying of the black female in the car. The old white dude came from a different world than the young black man, and one is much more accustomed to handling a physical situation without fearing for his life at the early stages of physical intimidation.
It's murder, pure and simple. This is what the insane mainstream media so desperately wanted to make out of the cut-and-dry Rittenhouse case.
well said, im not one to pull the racist card on people, but there seems to be no other reason to shoot dude after he was trying to flee. Or he is just a sico who wanted an excuse to kill.
The rittenhouse case for me was determined by one factor, whether he was legally allowed to be in possession of that firearm at that time. If he wasn't supposed to have the gun it was his fault, if he was allowed to have it then it was self defence, simple as that
@Lilith-Rose that may be your opinion, but that doesn't determine weather someone should be tried for 1st degree murder. lets say he was not allowed to have the gun, would the fact that he was acting in self defense, be completely negated because he was not allowed to own the weapon that he used to keep himself from harm? no. Thank god an argument like that would not hold up in court, because If I did, many people would not even get a chance to testify in court, because they would be dead..
@LODUS yes it would absolutely be negated by that fact, and he would have been charged with manslaughter because of it, as would anyone else in that situation. If you are not legally allowed to possess something it is physically impossible to legally use it to defend yourself because the very act of possession is illegal, end of story
To be honest, as much as this man is in the wrong, the family’s self-entitlement and non-civil nature is only being overshadowed here. The woman parks in a handicapped spot, instead of admitting her error and moving when called out, she escalated it into a verbal argument. Her husband then came out and assaulted a man for arguing. The only reason they’re not the ones who came out as villains is because this man was even for self-entitled and non-civil to the point of using deadly force unreasonably. Had he reacted differently and called the police instead of shooting, the perception of this whole thing would be completely different.
@Jon Mancuso The only people who have a “bad take” are the ones who aren’t reasonable enough to see a story has more than one point of view with multiple possible endings. All 3 adults in this video made calls based on bad judgment. If I were put into any of all three situations, I would have reacted differently than they did. Only one of them had a weapon and used deadly force which over shadows the rest. Parking in a handicapped spot is lack of common courtesy, being called out on it and arguing back is a display of self-entitlement. Seeing a man argue with your wife and lunging at him without first using verbal communication to dessiminate the non-physical altercation shows the man’s lack of judgement and willingness to act before he thinks. Shooting someone because you were pushed down to the ground is also an impulsive, bad judgment call. If you can’t see that, you’re letting your emotions guide you rather than your logic, thus giving YOU a bad take.
@Lilith-Rose The worst take in this thread so far comes from you. Had Kyle not had the rifle with him, the pedos would catch him and kill him. He did what needed to be done to save his life. Simple as.
But the most important point is that illegal possession of an object does not disqualify one from their right to defend their life with reasonable force. There have been countless cases in multiple different legal systems and an opinion such as yours is never even considered. I remember a case of a person who literally grabbed an unregistered pistol from a mugger and killed the perp with it and the illegal possession of an illegal firearm didn't even come up in court.
@laszu in your example they took the weapon from the attacker, they weren't carrying it already so that's a completely different situation. Plus if Kyle wasn't there with a rifle he wouldn't have been chased and wouldn't have needed to use the rifle so again your point is invalid
@Lilith-Rose Which brings me to another interesting thought. By your logic the dude that got his arm shredded up would be held accountable for ALL events that unfolded there, since he drew his illegal glock.
if there is one thing I've learned watching these videos, it's that you aren't convincing the police by yourself, get a damn lawyer that's the only thing that should be coming out of your mouth.
35:00 . Standing up for the rules of society doesn’t mean you’re “bold”. It means you are a good citizen.
Asian country’s are a good example of this. They don’t want trouble, but will call you out when you’re in the wrong.
This man shouldn’t have been attacked for mere words. The fact they consider using that against him, calling someone out for not follow the rules, is down right SHAMEFUL!!!
The death of the young man is absolutely tragic and shouldn’t have happened. The physical altercation should have never happened either. My heart and prayers goes out to the kids.
my thoughts exactly, I wonder what the cops' intentions were when they are interrogating this guy. I feel like they are pushing for the guy to incriminate himself rather than trying to find out what exactly happened after the guy had clearly shown that he was willing to cooperate. I think they should have shown him the video and have him explain what happened as events transpired. And also have the witnesses on the scene corroborate with the CCTV footage.
@zgra74 we didn't actually hear the words that he said, the CCTV footage didn't have any audio to actually hear the threats against the wife and the children.
I watched the cctv footage once, and knew he was going to get convicted. The prosecution should have needed only to have played the footage and rested their case.
I'm a gun advocate, but this is exactly why I believe that there needs to be longer and better processes of someone being able to legally get a gun and be able to actually carry that gun. When I went to get my CPL I had went to the range for 9-10 months after buying my pistol to practice with it and get comfortable and knowing I knew how to use the gun properly and safely, was able to take it apart and put it back together. I then felt comfortable being able to take a class properly to actually carry something that could end somebodys life. I've been around guns and shot guns my whole life and even after that amount of time I still didn't think I was ready to actually carry something that could be used to harm/kill another person.
The FIRST THING they teach you is that actually using the gun is the absolute last thing that you should ever do and to completely avoid confrontation or putting yourself in a scenario that could be confrontational. The scariest part about that class was when we went to the range and you had to actually demonstrate you could shoot the gun properly and reload it etc. Everyone in that class besides myself and 3 others, literally DIDN"T know how to shoot a gun and take it off safety or could even shoot straight. Shit some of them have never shot a gun before in there life. I was in shock that these people could actually be carrying something that could harm somebody.
I think you do have the right to own guns and that shouldn't change but what needs to change is the process of getting the guns and being able to carry those guns. This whole situation should never have happened over a stupid ass handicap spot.
imagine if he didnt talk to police and made his case about how he could have possibly died from the push if he hit his head. he could have argued that in the shock state he was he was fearing for his life after the possible assault on his life
I would understand if the man actually did come at him after he knocked him down and then he fired his weapon that’s understandable but the video it clearly shows after he draws handgun the man backs up and he’s not a threat because he clearly noticed the handgun aimed at him all around a bad situation you shouldn’t be going up to random people knocking them to the ground and you should not immediately draw your firearm
He got 20 years in prison, he might still be able to go home after prison and enjoying life. What happens with the entire family he just destroyed? 20 years ladies and genttlemen is what it costs to destroy a human life and family. I would say death sentence
Drejka kept raising the level of aggression while armed just so he could put himself in this position so he could do what he has been fantasizing about.....killing someone in 'self defense.'
What I hate most about this case, is that if the people who had been threatened with the gun in previous events had just told the police... He would not have a firearm. This was a failure by the American people to report a dangerous individual.
That sigh in the officers voice at 21:56 when he gets him off the floor, he knew in that moment what had happened, he knew he had to keep humouring him to get him to dig his own grave.
Carrying a gun and going shopping is beyond my comprehension!
1 like
Just for Fun2022-01-08 00:03:08 (edited 2022-01-08 00:04:03 )
Why did he have a gun? Was he looking for a fight? He wouldn’t change anything!!? How about not approach a women alone in a car with her children or have a loaded fun in your pocket. He is an angry person, and was looking for trouble! Syncopate!!!!
only bit I have a problem with is this "perfect shot" the guy ran back in the store, 5 seconds, plenty of time to return fire, a "perfect shot" head shot, the person drops instantly, no chance of return fire.
It's crazy to think these are the same mindsets that think a 6 foot distance during a pandemic isn't necessary. However. "gotta save my life after harassing others " is. Yeesh.
This. Man was an ex-con AND massively escalated te situation INFRONT of his family. Was fresh out of prison and looking for trouble. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. A tragedy, in a sense.
@ 40:00 that was a lie intended to justify his actions to the court , but it prolly had to opposite effect. Anyone that has killed someone do not want to go through it again .
This dude is such a coward. Starts a confrontation with a woman with her kids present, then when confronted and defended by her boyfriend, his reaction is to shoot first. Such a Pathetic Coward. 😡
He murdered a father and husband for what? Stupid everyday fight. There wasn't any imminent threat for his life. The person who pushed him, stepped away while he was aiming! I believe he didn't mean to kill him. But because of that he deserve's a second murder degree charges.
Though I hate ppl that park in handicapped spaces I find it odd he would make a big deal about it when there were so many actual closer parking spaces that were closer to the entrance of the store. Recognising of course most handicapped spots are usually wider than most for obvious reasons. If he was so concerned about the situation he could have called the police (not using the 911 #) and report the person) he had no justification for shooting this guy as the man was not armed
Matthew Pulley2022-01-02 01:48:45 (edited 2022-01-02 01:52:34 )
JFC. "I couldn't see his hands, his face, if he had a weapon, if he had others with him, where he came from... He didn't say anything, either. But I can tell you he was Black, at my store, and coming to finish me. I had those reasons to shoot." I wonder what news station this tool watches. #BlackLivesMatter
I can't decide what would be worse: if you actually believe that Drejka was justified in his actions or if you're just trying to stir shit up. At a certain point, it's all the same I guess.
@nolanone I don't think the shooter was justified. I do think that each party, the driver, the assaulter, and the shooter were culpable in the outcome of this tragic event. What if the driver had simply moved her car? What if the assaulted had said something, instead of blindsiding the shooter? What if the shooter had minded his own damn business?
ugh it's sickening to see how many people in these comments are defending this murderer. parking in the wrong spot does not justify murder. failing to de-escalate and shoving someone during an argument also does not justify murder, wtf is wrong with y'all?! just say you're racist and go.
I am a military medic 100% he be alive if the paramedic got there in 5 minutes but thay have to wait for the police i think i from the uk in the uk we have to wait for the armed police before paramedics go in to help RIP buddy
His first problem was walking up to the car. When you’re armed, you still try to avoid any type of confrontation. If he would have just minded his own business, everything would be fine. Nobody would have gotten hurt, and this moron would be still walking around armed.
@1jayteeemel I wish he would have done that. Clearly his mentality was to bait someone into a situation where he could plausibly pull his firearm. Cowardly behavior if you ask me.
I am all for self defense, but this wasn't self defense. #1 - This guy should have minded his own business. #2 - Even if you get shoved to the ground, take a moment to assess everything. The victim was turned away in a non-aggressive stance and got shot. Unbelievable.
I'm not American, never touched a gun in my life. But...idk, is it that hard to aim for the leg? Isnt a shot in the leg enough to "neutralize" any " immediate threat"?
@D2x I know that, it wasn't legitimate legal self defense use of a lethal firearm. I watched the entire video (a couple times). I'm just saying that having a gun in a dumb situation is a really, really regrettable thing sometimes (such as this).
He was 100% in the wrong for shooting the man, he's not in the wrong for 'defending' himself. he was arguing with a woman, a couple meters away from her, didn't verbally threaten her, then her husband knocked him to the ground. If he wasn't shot dead, the husband could likely be jailed for assault. Not defending Michael's actions, the man didn't take a step forward and go to attack him like Michael said, and certainly didn't deserve to die. But he likely wouldn't have been shot dead if he didn't knock Michael down.
True,but if that was happening to your partner/wife what are your first instincts??"hey can't we just get along?" No,it's who the fuck you think you are talking to my girl like that🥊🥋🤬
Update: He is at the Florida Columbia Annex Prison. Satellite shows he will be able to see the handicap spaces, near the visitors’ entrance, from the prison yard. Fence is about 40 feet from the parking area. He will be squinting to see the handicap tags on windshields. If you see his latest prison mugshot he is drenched in sweat...and he was complaining about Pinellas county jail AC being too cold. There are no AC or fans in Florida prisons. If you are unlucky enough to have your bunk on the sunny side of the dorm...the concrete wall gets vert hot.
The fact that he had pulled his gun on multiple people before is SCARY. Like he set off that day to kill someone. My best friend is in a wheelchair, and we never even use the handicapped parking spaces cuz we can do without it, and we think others may need it more. There have been so many times that the handicapped spots have been filled with those not needing it, and we just roll past them and smile. To us, that's enough to get the message across. NOT SHOOTING SOMEONE. Holy cow!
If you want to have a weapon you should have a lot more training on the what you can and cannot do with your weapon and if you kill someone without a real reason you should sign something that say you understand you will go to prison if you misuse your weapon. I would have said the guy who got killed should have not gone straight into pushing the guy he should have at least spoken to him. The guy with the gun gets his gun out maybe that is fine but to just shoot with out any warning or the fact the guy who got killed had no weapon show this guy either wanted to shot someone or did not have the IQ or skills to have a gun.
A shove to the pavement does not justify shooting someone. But don’t lose sight that it was beyond stupid to shove someone like that who posed no immediate danger. Do that and you increase the odds of a violent response.
2 lessons: - It was stupid for the guy to push him. Just don't do that.... nothing good is gonna come out of it. - if your country is not at war; don't carry a gun. It's just dangerous. All of us have rage and fear in our heart. So it is very tempting to grab a gun if you know you have it. But your brain does not think of the consequences so fast. This guy has thrown his life because he made a decision in 1 second, based on the fact that he had firepower with him. If he didn't it would have been a fistfight and everyone would be at home the same night with their loved ones.
americans and guns. I'm in Canada, I don't need a gun, have no desire to have one. 25% of the population in Canada are gun owners. The laws for having them are much stricker. background checks are thorough, criminal record, even mental health issues are taken into consideration. We have our problems with them but nothing like in the USA!
Bruh, that’s called assault, doesn’t make what way you make it. There’s nothing illegal about informing someone about legality of parking in a disabled space.
You can see him put on the whole “my arm hurts” act when the detective first walks in to begin the interview. That waiting period after they took the cuffs off of him he acts fine, then suddenly when someone walks in he can’t even use the arm to shake hands. He deserves to rot in hell for what he’s done.
27:26 just makes no sense.. or I mean it does... but then when altercations happen.. whaa? He could have pulled a gun... obviously wasn’t going to but he could have.. :/
Oh and also he is fabricating the arm maybe but also you clearly haven’t ever fallen over hard. Or are young...
You’ll stiffen up 30 mins later and then be ruined for days... much like this guy is. He got shoved pretty hard unexpectedly to the ground... and he already looks like hammered shit.. ain’t no spring chicken is he.
He’s guilty because he can recall his actions almost perfectly which shows ( as well as him not confessing either ) that he was never scared for his life. It’s not instant at all and he just guns someone down really maliciously and thoughtfully/reasonably ... but bad reasoning... thoughtfully. Hahaha. You know what I mean.
As a handicapped person that needs a close parking spot I really can't stand the self appointed Handicapped parking police. Please don't be that person. Its not really helpful. You are not being helpful by confronting strangers and making them feel as if they are under attack. You don't know their story. I have been in situations where I was driving a friends car and I didn't have a placard and I used the space anyway because I was in pain. I also know if I got a ticket I would be able to protest it. If someone would confront me I would just wave my fake leg at them. Anyway with this situation why is he going around packing a gun as he confronts strangers? Would he do it without a gun? Admittingly he wouldn't even though he recanted I think his original response was the truth. He wanted a reason to use his gun and he was out looking for it.
579 likes
Replies (12)
gary oak2021-06-07 22:28:01 (edited 2021-06-07 22:28:15 )
"I would just wave my fake leg at them" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 that'd end the confrontation real quick legend
It’s also a gas station where about every parking space is super close. It’s not exactly forcing a disabled person to walk from the back of a parking lot. He didn’t care about disabled people he wanted a fight.
My step mom has MS and its really annoying when all the handicapped places are full, but at the same time a lot of these gas stations have really shitty handicap spots that just feel like they were thrown in to meet regulation. I don't even see a ramp anywhere near that parking spot. Unless there are no other close spots or the spot is in front of a ramp, its not worth it. Even then, you could just ask them to move their car like a sane person.
Yeah I feel the same way he definitely instigated it and the guy stopped when he seen the gun.. also the victim was in the wrong to though you shouldn’t be able to push people to the ground for yelling at your girlfriend without expecting to get shot.. in my regular civilian opinion man slaughter is the appropriate charge
@EtelorveHc49 Um just because someone push you down , doesn't necessarily mean you should shoot them 😕 . When the guy take out the gun the victim was ready to back off . He could of easily just threaten him to stop with the gun.
If you're REALLY concerned about handicap parking enforcement, then call the actual parking enforcement people! I think the guy was really just upset that there were strange black people at a gas station he goes to every day (also why tf does he go there every day??)
“ I had never been in this situation before” that’s the problem with people like this, if someone had knocked him on his ass a long time ago he wouldn’t have made it this far in life still acting like a fool. He was so surprised that someone actually stood up to him.
@EtelorveHc49 shooting someone for pushing you is a little overkill no matter the situation. If you can’t control yourself with a firearm you shouldn’t be allowed to carry one. As a man you get into physical altercations throughout your life. A punch in the face shouldn’t mean a guy loses his life. You can get beat up and just fight back without unloading your gun.
this guy freaks me out. he really believes that his interpretation of the situation justified his response, even though the circumstances pointed to him being the primary aggressor and didn't warrant such a response. It's a weird situation, that happened incredibly fast
yes, he was the original aggressor, but the victim escalated it into a physical altercation; he should've de-escalated the situation, not shoved the guy. i'm not saying he's was justified in killing the guy, but tbh, if someone suddenly shoved me down, i'd be scared af that he was gonna start pounding me.
@lang 1007 it’s not the victim’s responsibility to not get shot while he’s visibly backing off. it’s a bigger issue than that. this guy was looking for a chance to shoot someone and he got it.
@zooportal he wasn't backing off. he only backed off after he got shot. he went up to the guy and shoved him. he was also looking for a fight. he just picked the wrong guy, some trigger-happy guy that yes, "was looking for a chance to shoot someone." they were BOTH looking for a fight. the victim wasn't there to diffuse the situation, but to use physical force to intimidate the guy.
@lang 1007 "he wasnt backing off" . I am kindly gonna ask you to rewatch the clip at least 5 times and tell me the truth next time . The black man was just unfortunate to pick a fight with a kill-ready sensitive wussy . There was a WHOLE 2.5s of backing up . You can take from this that he just wanted to shoot his weapon . You cant say otherwise
@Sxiller you're not "kindly" when you insinuate i'm lying. YOU rewatch the clip, because he walked right up to him and shoved him without even trying to diffuse the argument. there was NOT 2.5s of him backing up. YOU rewatch the clip and tell me the truth next time.
i'm not going to go into this with you. i'll just agree to disagree.
@lang 1007 This is largely how I feel about this whole event as well. And I can kindof see how in such a moment, immediately after being shoved from behind with clear intent to harm you, any movement could be perceived as a further threat. I think Drejka was just acting on reflexes. Just my opinion but I think 20 years is a bit harsh all things considered... 15 seems better.
@Sxiller he took a step back that doesn’t indicate his no longer a threat. Maybe if he didn’t want to get into a fight that would potentially cost his life, maybe don’t go around shoving random people
@Sxiller "The black man was just unfortunate to pick a fight with a kill-ready sensitive wussy" He didn't pick a fight with him, he blindsided him and knocked him over. That was the 'wussy' move.
@lang 1007 No there was , it even said on the screen 2.5s . He took 3 steps back and turned his body towards the other side and then got shot straight in the heart, not even in the leg just went straight for the kill because he is obviously not okay in the head. You just don't want to accept reality and admit to being wrong...
To those who missed it, the victim AND the witness saw the guy on the ground pulling his gun and both started backing the fuck away. The shooter said in the interview that the victim twitched and he shot him.
@Louis G I did, you should listen to the closing argument of the prosecutor. When he took the gun out the situation was defused, You can see it in the video, you have the right to defend yourself, not to avenge an offense.
@Matías Fernandez Sorry, made same mistake somewhere else. Indeed he pushed ,walked towards him ,saw the gun, clearly stepped back and only then got shot. There was enough time to realize the treat was "neutralized", no need to shoot
it's not weird. it's the problem with being able to own a gun without education. he knows nothing about why self-defense and gun laws are implemented much less how to interpret them.
he did back off, there's no arguing that, but ONLY after he saw him reach for a gun. the wife didn't need to get out of the car either. they're both hot heads. i can't say for sure, but in most cases that shove would've been proceeded with kicks and swings. if he was okay with blindsiding a guy and pushing him from behind to the ground, he'd be okay with any other hits he could get in.
he leaned on his shoulder for the 45 mins he was waiting and the second they came back in the room...aww my arm hurts sooooo much
16 likes
Stephen Z.2020-08-13 10:59:02 (edited 2020-08-13 11:00:30 )
@natasha yeah hunny boo boo we are serious dudes phantom injury to draw sympathy especially when he shows the detective how he pulled his gun
4 likes
Stephen Z.2020-08-14 03:29:25 (edited 2020-08-14 03:33:51 )
@natasha your in agreement, hey that's my bad then... that was extrrreeemely very transphobic of you and it's not cool at allllll and I am totally outraged right now.🤬🤬lmao 👍😜😜
thug felt entitled to block a handicapped parking spot, violently attacked person standing near his car without warning, striking him to the ground, got his just pay in “hard currency” ... sh@t happens ... move right on, nothing to see here...
Right??? I had a man twice my size pick me up, and THROW me onto asphalt hard as hell, and I wasn't as hurt as he's pretending to be. I was covered in blood. But I didn't wine about it...
The dude cries because he misses his dogs. But no consideration for the mother and kids that miss their father. That he killed.
1535 likes
Replies (44)
Luis Lozano2020-11-06 21:11:51 (edited 2020-11-06 21:12:12 )
@highlandrab19 yeah idk what video you watched but the guy took several steps back after he had pulled out his gun and proceeded to shoot him while the dad was retreating...
@highlandrab19 plus you are telling me you wouldnt push a guy away from your WIFE if they are screaming at her? Would you just let it happen and submit to the situation? A push should not be justifiable means for a shooting..
@Luis Lozano try to think from the guys perspective, a much bigger man runs put and pushes you, he could've impossibly known what his intents where and likely panicked.
But yes, shooting him was an unnecessary, but there really aint much to do.
Not to suggest that this shooting is justified, but this is a good reminder not to put your hands on people. Dead guy made a huge mistake just the same.
19 likes
Luis Lozano2020-11-10 07:19:35 (edited 2020-11-10 07:22:09 )
@Drained i agree, the only thing thwt troubles me is he waited pretty long to shoot, well atleast in my perspective, could that have been enough time to assess the situation and realize the larger man was not approaching him anymore ? How much time has to pass for it to be considered unethical to shoot someone? 2,3 or is after 4 seconds way to long to then shoot someone? Horrible situation all together anyhow.
@Luis Lozano yes, any rational person could've probably assessed that the threat was gone when he backed up. But his intentions behind shooting were probably not to "Kill him cus hes black". It's very difficult to know what his thinking was. Maybe he was just insanely scared? Who knows, but dont be to judgemental on this man. Its america after all, and there aint really a barrier that keeps dumbasses from obtaining lethal weapons.
@DivideBy Zero yes i am sure from my comment you can tell I don't understand some dog people , not all of them but this man for instance , he killed a human like his life doesn't matter he didn't even have any remorse for a whole ass human being I don't understand how he is capable of loving another life that is even less than a human ( dog). I am all for being kind to animals and animal right and stuff it's cool.
1:56 if you watch the vid closely, the real problem is created BY THE WIFE once the confrontation occurs. The WIFE exits her vehicle - perhaps after seeing her husband coming, perhaps not, but she endangers herself and husband by escalating the situation by getting RIGHT IN THE NUTTY GUY'S FACE. At first,I said the husband should have placed himself between his family and the nut, but there's no room. The man walks at regular speed before his wife plays the fool, and while he still didn't have to use violence and escalate things, the natural reaction of shielding his wife was taken away by the wife herself
The wife was determined that things would go badly
That said, the shooter should have just called the police and gave them the plate and never confronted strangers
@highlandrab19 He shouldn't have been messing with people to begin with, it wasn't any of his business. I never understand why people can't just mind their damn business. Dude was defending his family from a nosy idiot, he pushed him and then backed away when he saw the gun. He didn't threaten him any further and didn't beat him up. A push doesn't equate to gunning someone down.
@Drained what I don't think you understand was racist about his actions was the fact that he went up to the family's car (whom he could clearly identify as black), provoked them, then the moment they retaliate he perceives the father as a "threat" and assumes his actions before giving him much of a chance to react. we all know the stereotype that black men are "aggressive thugs" and this was the exact stereotype he projected onto the father, despite the fact that the father was only defending his family. you can hear it in his language when he's being interrogated, he even admits that all he had to go off was an assumption of the father's actions.
@godspeeding if i was a weak man getting pushed by a much bigger man, id react the same, whether he was black or not. Your argument is stupud, he shot because he was a threat, but he overreacted.
@Jack Of Blades welcome to america, i didnt write the gun laws. Maybe im pathetic, but im just stating a fact whilst youre drowning in your own hateful emotions. Maybe his actions are unjustified
@highlandrab19 ummmm what I saw was a man got pushed for harassing a mans wife and the dude pulled out a gun and the man who pushed him backed away immediately and still got shot
@Thobeka Ngwenyama How many times does the "shoot in the leg" meme have to be debunked? The legs are home to many major arteries. If he gets shot in the leg, yeah good luck saving him when blood is coming out of him like a garden hose. There's a reason you don't shoot the legs.
@Thobeka Ngwenyama Most Americans? Perhaps the criminal ones, who carry illegally obtained firearms.
The whole point of an open-carry/concealed-carry is to be able to defend yourself when your life is being threatened. That doesn't mean idiots won't abuse it to kill somebody and claim self defense. Good thing the courts threw the book at him.
@drained you are offended by us calling a murder to a black person racist, you are calling us sensitive for accusing racism but you are the one offended for it being called racist.
@drained even you Admit saying “welcome to America where no one gets shot in the leg” the American gun system is corrupt. Anyone can get a gun and shoot someone and half the time get away with it because it’s “self defense”
@highlandrab19 I’m gonna say what others have already said, DID YOU NOT WATCH THE VIDEO? The man shot took several steps back and retreated when the gun was pulled.
@Drained do you have any sympathy, why are you defending this monster, if you was in this man shoes watching someone yelling at your wife someone that gave you a child, someone you love, you would prolly do the same, that man is a selfish coward I wouldn’t show any empathy towards that man, he killed him when he was backing off , That’s the same small minded thinking that ruins society.
@miguelitoven He is an irresponsible weapons handler to say the least. But at least when he gets out he will never be able to possess a firearm ever again.
Dude's like this are why I don't engage road-ragers anymore. I just move over and let 'em pass. Too many people out there who just can't wait to defend themselves....
step dad had a gun pulled on him in OUR DRIVEWAY while selling a lawnmower.... things escalated somehow and my step dad said he needs to leave or he will be put into the dirt and the guy pulled a gun...... I hate people that cant wait to defend themselves. they look for any possible opportunity.
@Willy Bones he might have been more hesitant to draw his gun if there was a stronger possibility the other man (or his wife) had one and could return fire. Guys like this are only so confident with their guns because there are too many Americans that are afraid of or against owning guns. The power trip stops if everyone has the power. No, I don't own guns. I'm a truck driver, I can't have firearms in a commercial vehicle. I don't ever want to have to shoot anyone, and my truck is honestly way more dangerous than any pistol.
I had a guy in a pickup truck road raging at me, trying to get me to stop my semi by getting in front of me and braking. I just layed on my highway horn. He didn't keep it up, that thing is ridiculously loud.
@Cole Black Yep...trucks kill more than guns do. That dude was itching to cause a situation to shoot someone. As I understand it he got 20 years. Probably should have been more.
@Cole Black idk who told you that you can't have firearms in a commercial vehicle but it's not true. I've literally been searched with two guns in my truck and they just gave them back to me after they were done looking.
" just move over and let 'em pass. " - I wish all American drivers would do this. It should be done EVERY time. I've been living in the US for half my life and I still hate American drivers. Why do they hog the left/passing/overtaking lanes on 2 lane highways, rarely check their mirrors and be utterly selfish when driving? If someone wants to go faster than you, just move over and let them passed FFS. It's called driving courtesy but Americans, in general, never show any driving courtesy on he road. Most other countries do.
@Cole Black That is insanely incorrect. If what you are saying is true, there wouldn't be situations of people robbing gun stores, or shooting at cops, or robbing homes of tens of guns at once from known gun owners. Every criminal in the entire US pretty much knows there are more guns than humans here, and all these crimes happen anyway. The only difference if every single person here owned a gun would be more shootings in total and more retaliation shootings as well. (Example- Person breaks into your house, you shoot them, a week later you get a drive by on your house and your whole family is now dead.)
Most crimes (especially property crimes, like theft) are done by drug addicts, and usually while they are under the effects for drugs, or possibly in withdrawal. In case you have never seen or known a drug addict, they frequently lack logical thinking ability and the lack of giving a fuck about their actions. A homeowner with a gun isn't going to scare them, they don't care if they die (at the very least they don't fear dying more so than they fear not having drugs), clearly, as they are blasting street fentanyl up their veins 20 times a day. A good anecdotal example for this that I have is someone down the street always had a bunch of crazy pro 2a signs on his lawn, pretty consistently, this led to his house being TARGETED to be robbed, probably because they knew he had plenty of guns in there. They stole 11 guns from his house in total. (this was about 25 years ago or so, in upstate NY)
@rdizzy1 I'm aware of much of this information. But I was specifically referring to this case in particular. With this kind of person. He did not appear to be on drugs. He just seemed like he was itching for the chance to use his gun to "defend himself." HE might have been more hesitant to draw and shoot if there was a strong possibility he could be shot in return by either the man or the woman involved. Also, I don't want to make any assumptions on your stance regarding gun control. But from your words I take it that you may be in favor of heavier gun control. In which case, let me ask you this: who does gun control affect? In reality, who are the people that are mostly affected by laws preventing average citizens from buying guns through legal channels?
@Cole Black No, my personal beliefs are very left wing, more left wing than corporate dems, and you'll see more pro gun individuals when you hit the far left. I believe the cat is out of the bag here in the US, but I also believe that adding more guns to the mix does not make things better. More citizens with guns=more criminals with guns, it never ends.(There are over 200,000 guns stolen in property crimes every year in the US, and 80% of those guns are never recovered and are then in the hands of violent criminals) Almost all of the guns that are illegal and in criminal hands originally came from legal gun owners.
There is no real solution to the shooting issue. If they wanted to enact strict gun control or regulations that had actual teeth and would have statistical beneficial effects, it needed to be done 50 years ago, it is far too late now.
@rdizzy1 Yes, you do have a point, and don't mistake me for being right wing, left wing, centrist, buffalo wing, none of that shit. But once again, I was mainly referring to the specific situation in the video, as well as situations like it. Had the victim been armed, or his wife, as well as if there were a more likely possibility that they did have a gun, there may not have BEEN any victims. THAT guy presents to me like someone who only did that because he thought there wouldn't be any real consequences. I'd say a strong possibility of getting turned into swiss cheese by the man he drew the gun on, or by his wife, would be a pretty strong deterrent. And yes, absolutely, there will always be people who get fucked up on meth, heroine, etc. That don't fear death because they don't even currently fully grasp the concept they could die. There will always be psychos as well. Ones who don't care if they die. But genuinely, if I ever had a kid, raised them, and sent them off into this fucking disaster of a world to work at a job, and get their own apartment: I'm going to feel a lot better if I know they have a gun and are able to use it effectively. Not just them, but my girlfriend, wife, boyfriend, husband, whoever the fuck I'm with at the time, I'd love for them to be armed, because I worry. Same with friends, family, etc. There are very few people I personally know that I wouldn't want to have a gun. And most of those are not in my life anymore.
@Willy Bones if you don’t want to protect yourself that’s your option, I’m not going to force you to arm yourself. Just don’t start looking around when evil happens to you.
its funny you said so when you see he was arrested before on threatening drivers with a gun on the road for reason such as Driving too slowly ,Parking in handicapped space .Stopping at yellow light that guy was looking for a chance to use his gun no matter what
@Cole Black well that's just objectively not true. People like this are hinged and crazy. they do not think that far ahead, quite the opposite. If more people would have guns, people like this would use that as a defence to shoot on sight, as they would see the "bad guy" probably carrying so he should defend people from this bad guy quicker! sooo no, more people owning guns would not help in situations like this or with people like this. other cases? I don't know, maybe it would help, im not against guns, nut i am against bad arguments.
@jukkis6699 "objectively" is a bit of a strong word in this case. If you genuinely think he wasn't thinking that far ahead, you're probably a bit naive. I would bet a lot of money that he thought about an "opportunity" like that ALL THE TIME. Fantasizing about it, thinking about how cool he'll look in news interviews, shit like that. This situation happened as if he planned for it to go like that, at least for the most part.
They need a return on investment somehow, guns are expensive and these nutcases want a reason to use them legally and if they can, sound like some sort of hero in the process.
Yep, same, I gave the finger to a guy once after he cut me off and he followed me for quite a while, that sobered me up, now I just curse in my car lol
@Cole Black You're welcome. Idk why people always say this. Tons of truckers carry lol. You still have to obey local laws. If you're going to a state that doesn't offer reciprocity for your CCW, then you can't carry there, and your company can set a policy against carrying, but it's not a law, so the only thing they can do is fire you if they find out. Even then, that's mostly just big companies.
@Now as I was saying... Yeah but his company isn't the law. Only thing they can do is fire him for violating policy. If you don't tell them, they'll never know.
@Emperor Ziko I do know a fuck ton of shippers and receivers won't allow firearms on their property, so at the very least it could be inconvenient to carry.
@Cole Black btw, that's how it is with any private business that doesn't allow firearms. If they find out you're carrying, and they ask you to leave, and you refuse, and they call the police, and the police get there and you STILL haven't left, you can be charged with civil trespassing. Not even criminal trespassing.
@A Real Religious Man You can pull a firearm with the full intention of shooting and then not actually pull the trigger when circumstances change. That's exactly what should've happened here. He was fully justified in pulling his gun. He was just assaulted and put into a very vulnerable position--he had every reason to "intend" to shoot the threat at that moment. However, as the gun came out, the threat instantly dissipated. At this moment, Michael should've reassessed the situation and not fired. That's not brandishing, but simply elevating your defense to match a threat. That defense just needs to adapt as the threat changes, though.
@blappinOncoppaz He wouldn't of pushed the old man if he knew he had a gun, that guy was a hot head who pushed him without knowing what was going on. With a name like that you cant talk about what's right and what's not anyway.
@Gunkanjima You do agree that it is right that the man who shot the other man is getting punished though, right? while he had his reason, you have to agree that the man who shot went over the top and just and killed somebody after he backed up and wasn't a threat anymore. I just want to know what side you're on, because i, like you, agree that he shouldn't be charged for murder, which he wasn't.
Consider the fact that from the downed man's view, it MAY have looked as though the standing man was turning to draw a gun. I know he didn't say that, perhaps the defense lawyer would have if the old man had just shut up.
@blappinOncoppaz No, because now you've escalated the situation. Now others would be justified in pulling a gun on you. Best case scenario would have been to call the cops when the lady refused to move her car, he's not a traffic cop.
@J0kerclash perhaps not "usually", but it's definitely a possibility. I'm not betting my life in what usually happens. Someone's that violent with me and you'd better believe it's serious now.
@harrod19 If you're going to shoot first ask questions later then you're probably better suited not owning a gun to begin with; you create no possible avenue for de-escalation.
He pushed him and waited, and when the gun was drawn he backed off, if he was on top of him winding up to punch him whilst he's down then it would be more reasonable, but that's not what happened, and knowing when to observe when the conflict is de-escalating is an important part of gun ownership, which is why what he did was classed as a crime.
Legally it couldn't be murder. Because, it was negligent and reckless. Not knowingly and purposefully.
They would have most lost the case, because of legal definitions had they charge him with murder. They would have to prove he knowingly and purposefully killed him ( which would be almost impossible in this case). So it is better to charge someone with something you know you will win, then to try and stretch your luck and most likely lose.
I've seen a video or two about someone getting knocked out while standing up, then die from their head hitting the pavement. A push like that is nearly attempting murder as well.
Nope. Marquis the thug started the violence with the push. Don’t bring a push to a gunfight.
2 likes
C Smith2020-09-07 09:50:20 (edited 2020-09-07 10:09:49 )
Not murder, but manslaughter for sure. Thug started the confrontation by knocking old man down. But you can't shoot someone that is backing away from you
@Francis Balfour Oh I don't disagree, he was clearly in the wrong. The guy did back up. It was okay for him to pull his gun out (even the prosecuting attorney said that) But it was not okay for him to shoot. He was looking for a reason to shoot, in my opinion
Only Americans can think that it is ok to aim a gun at someone for being pushed. Period. You guys have to change this absurd mindset. And change you stupid laws on fireweapon...or better...have some.
Yeah but it is harder to get him for murder, I'd say it's better to almost certainly get him for manslaughter than to take the chance that he walks free by going for murder.
@Jon Jackson You're not defending your wife because he isn't physically assaulting her. Verbal confrontations happen all the time. You'd be an idiot if you think him pushing the dude was justified. The gun pullout was.
2 likes
E H2020-09-09 08:37:40 (edited 2020-09-09 08:40:02 )
The problem with that, is it is a harder case to make and can be a possible "over charge". There are cases where people were over charged for a crime and the cases were dismissed or person was acquitted, but had they gone for a lesser charge would have gotten a conviction
As a gun owner it is your responsibility to de-escalate and retreat confrontations to secure the safety of all individuals involved. You shouldn't own a gun if you don't do this.
Well, that doesn't really work out does it. It seems to me that you can only say someone shouldn't own a gun. But as you can see that guy cleared the "test" or whatever to carry a gun, then 20 odd years later he fired it and killed a person. I don't see how that is only his problem when you have a dead father on the other side.
TAROT EXCELLENCE - cause he’s supporting a murderer, who killed a father in front of his wife and child for no reason. He tried to act like a father is out of line for protecting his family by shoving a threatening man away from them
oblivion tenant are you telling me that you saw this the first time you saw the video? Or, did you reach that conclusion after stop, pause, rewind was used? If you used those things to come to your decision, you failed. The guy on the ground had 2.5 seconds to realize and react. He didn’t have the luxury of extra time like the people who are watching the video.
How much can you accomplish in 2.5 seconds? Especially if you are in a heightened fight or flight frame of mind?
@TAROT EXCELLENCE none of these things justify what he did; merely explain. I doubt many people would say he probably wasn't afraid, but merely being afraid shouldn't give you license to end someone's life in a civilized society. Even if he were in fear of his life, it would be nonsensical to ignore the context of him just being pushed (which I know everyone in this comment section has been pretending is some tragically terrifying action, but, seriously, it's low-level assault at worst). If you react to being shoved with the use of deadly force, you should: 1) Not be able to own a weapon like a gun that gives you the ability to kill more easily 2) Be educated on reasonable force and force amplifiers 3) Probably get some sort of anger management or other emotional coping skills
He was stepping to him, before he saw the gun. In this situation you could overlook that the person is now actually reversed his direction. This is badly executed self defense, we shouldn't however forget who was the initial aggressor here.
@Zoop Defloop he took 1 step towards him and was still like 5+ ft away from him so it doesnt matter if he stepped towards him but once he pulled for his gun he instantly stepped back and froze dont defend this murderer one bit racist
@Twizzy lmao who’s defending him? I stated a fact. When I look at clouds I see faces, dogs, frogs. You probably see racism 😆 dude saying that he stepped to him was a half truth, you agree, then you make an assumption to put us in a victim state like everyone is racist, that type of victim stuff harms our community as much as racism . Gtfoh
@Connor Brearley You probly never been blindsighted and tackled hard on the floor...can't believe these stupid comments from know it all persons that obviously never had a rush of adrenalite after falling to the ground, with blurred vision and buzzing sound...Ever heard of people dying when falling on the ground or being severly injured?
@Twizzy You do know that if someone is within 12 feet you can cover they can cover that distance within a few seconds and still take your gun, especially when you're on the ground. Even if you hit them a few times if you don't puncture their heart or their brain they can easily shrug off the pain especially with adrenaline.
@Helen Webster its interesting to see their arguments from a non American point of view but also disturbing. The way i see it, woman parked where she shouldn't have, its a thing, whatever. guy thats larger than her comes over causing a scene about it, her man sees a threat to his woman and pushes him away... gets murdered.
There was not at any point in time a threat to that mans life to be shooting someone square in the chest. He couldn't wait to be 'defending himself'. This is a straight up murder and if these other commentors think parking in a handicapped spot deserves you to die then they lack a grasp on reality... and i have a disabled child, its not worth killing over. Take your knock for intimidating and verbally abusing a woman and walk away. He is not the law he is not above the law, if he had a problem its not his position to even confront, he has options to report it, easy, no life lost. She would get a fine and that kid would still have a dad! But from what i see in other comments there were reports of this man threatening others with his gun and throwing racial slurs, thats who they are defending and thats messed up.
@M Wilt how can people be so brainwashed? If you start shit and get hurt thats at the very least partly on you if not entirely on you. This over aggressive man got what was definitely coming to him. Starting fights with random people to protect your right to park wrong wasn't a recipe for a long life now was it?
@Helen Webster Just so you know shoving someone onto a hard surface like concrete can easily kill or lead to serious injury of the victim especially when they don't see it coming like in Drejka's case, this sort of thing happens all the time. If the black guy didn't want to be shot then maybe he should have thought about that before assaulting/attempting to murder someone over a verbal dispute.
@Helen Webster Because it's much easier to remember the name of a guy who's name is literally in the title of this video that just so happens to be focused on him unlike the guy who was killed.
I am using black as a descriptive term because it's simple and concise and you know who I am talking about. Would you prefer me to draw my sentence out even more and sound ridiculous by saying "if the guy who was shot didn't want to be shot" instead?
@Steven Thompson neither did they know he was armed. Saying he is a racist is a mere opinion that is not based on evidence. The agressor, even if being an ass was not being dangerous until he was violently shoved on the ground.
@Don't drink the Kool-Aid If someone is backing away from you once you draw your gun there is zero justification to fire. Look at the damn video. He starts backing away and is about to turn around. Very clearly was not going to charge the guy.
@Dio A maybe he shouldn't have been creating an altercation over a handicap parking spot, and the black man wouldn't have felt the need to protect his family. You do realize we can spin this any way we want. Admit that murder is wrong regardless of that shit you're talking about. Like wtf. If he felt threatened he should've just left or even just pointed the gun at him as a warning. People that are too ready to kill someone maybe shouldn't have a gun. That's stupid. Stop defending a racist murderer (not saying he was racist just bc the guy he shot was black, but bc he's actually apparently racist)
@Don't drink the Kool-Aid if you dont start an altercation or argument maybe you wont get assaulted. If you don't go to the store, maybe you won't run into crazy people. If you don't live, maybe you wont have to deal with bad people. That's a continuation of that kind of logic. That's stupid, and thats literally blaming a victim that got shot. In the video he said he knew that by approaching the car, he knew he could've started a serious altercation, and that he chose to still continue. So how are you blaming the black guy for protecting his family and not the white guy for starting it all?
@What If If you don't park in handicapped spaces & break the law then you won't have to worry about any confrontation. Why not just park in a regular parking space if you want to avoid confrontation?
@Vintage Gamez Once again this all could've been avoided had they not parked in the handicapped parking. Somebody broke the law 1st and it wasn't the shooter.
@Vintage Gamez He was defending his family by assaulting someone with their back turned towards him? Did the shooter assault his family before the altercation or were they just having words?
@Don't drink the Kool-Aid the way you said previous stuff made it seem like you are trying to justify what the dude did simply bc he parked in the handicapped place which was surrounded by free spaces to park, I would understand the upset if everything else was occupied but there is literally a free parking spot like 5 meters away
@M Wilt yeah, you're definitely not from the states if you're surprised by the parade of bigots trying to justify obvious hate crimes. This man instigated the confrontation, intimidated a family, and decided to shoot his gun and kill a man over a minor physical altercation. They'll argue till they're blue in the face about how justified this shooting was, but they're not interested in justice or they'd accept the guilty verdict. No, they just want to either live out their Frank Castle inspired vigilante fantasies either in person or vicariously through another so they can punish the thugs, (i.e. black people) in their neighborhoods. Anyone claiming that this man was acting in self defense or that the father deserved to die is just a violent bigot upset the system did not protect the racist.
@Steven Thompson aggressor/victim can swap in an instant. the second the man pushed him, he became the aggressor. the second he stepped back, he became the victim again
@MyChannel i think he just pulled the gun and shot because he was scared. but if he wasnt so worried about people parking in a handicap spot being a vigilante this wouldnt of happened. the guy shouldnt of pushed him either. its just a bad situation
@Twizzy for one nothing he said was racist at all people need to stop bringing race into everything it’s unrelated and frankly stupid and he’s not excusing shot he wasn’t 5+ feet away he’s just saying we do need to look at all the details the guy was the aggressor and was obviously about to beat him up pulling a gun out was the right choice I would argue but he didn’t need to shoot the threat was enough to make him back up
@Progressive Politics & Cannabis Culture don’t assault people seriously keep the argument verbal it was wrong of him to shoot but in the case of bodily injury it was right to unholster his weapon and again if you don’t want to get shot don’t commit aggravated assault don’t want to lose an eye don’t take one don’t won’t to do the time don’t do the time etc and it’s amazing that half the people condemning him only see color and choose to see it as racism and not the clear AGGRAVATED ASSUALT that it was
@François Gagnon Lemieux he had enough time to assess the situation, he thought he was some type of hero and that gun gave him too much confidence. He’s an idiot serving 20 years, cope harder.
@Father Father I am not saying the guy is not an idiot, I guess everyone has this kind of neighbors that is a prick a d annoy the neighborhood watching at every little insignificant things happening in the neighborhood. Still, I find it unfair to say he had, without a doubt, 100% certain, that his intent was murder and not to defend himself after being savagely pushed to the ground. The guy should have minded his own business but it was never reason enaugh to agress him by shoving him this hard on the floor. Being shoved like that on the floor and having a gun on myself, there s a good chance I'd use it too if I don't understand ehat is happening. 4 second is not much to assess the situation, but look at it, the guy that shoved did raise his pants and was about to move forward on the older guy while he was getting up. He only did start moving toward for a brief moment until he noticed the guy was pulling a gun, then he stopped and backed out.
@Connor Brearley I disagree I think it’s totally fine that he pulled his weapon. A guy who was much bigger had just shoved him to the ground and initiated a physical altercation. Now he should never have pulled the trigger that was absolutely unjustifiable
@Zoop Defloop if calling out racism makes someone a victim.....wouldnt that mean the system of racism, and the people who perpetuate it, CREATE victims? could I dare say that...racism victimizes people??? gasp
@Infamous News I'm not talking about other cases I'm talking about this one, and he only pushed him because he defending his wife and kids. What would you do if you felt like someone was threatening your family? They both overreacted but he only pushed him and he didn't have a weapon so they was no need to shoot him point blank period. Some people are scary af and they don't need guns if they are gonna kill people over a parking spot.
@Michaela Jenkins that’s an irrelevant tangent. He said I was racist for my factual comment, that delegitimization real racism. When you call every little thing racist then it loses its meaning
@MyChannel if you getting pushed is a "life or death" situation after walking up and inspecting someone's car when 1. Not your property or place of employment 2. You are not a law figure, you have no arresting rights, therefore no approach reason.
@Zoop Defloop that’s the thing boo. we live in america. every little thing is racist 💀 it has been bread and ingrained into every aspect of our lives. you’re in pure denial if you don’t think so. racism can’t be made illegitimate bc it is a self sustaining system. but go off i guess
I saw a pretty bad accident one day on my way to University, a young woman ran a red light, and hit a pedestrian who was crossing. She hit him hard man, like I don’t know anything about vehicular accidents, but I was starting to cross when he was already in the middle of the road, and to my eyes it looked like she was going at least 60 when she hit. It could have been less? I don’t know, it was intense. He flew onto her windshield and bounced off pretty far. He was pretty fucked up, but still alive, even from my viewpoint I could see his head moving, eyes open, but his arms and body were twisted pretty bad, and I saw blood on his face.
I called triple 0 and left, watching this stuff irl just feels to morbid for me tbh. But, before I left, all I remember is the utter despair of the driver, that young woman. She was sitting on the side of the road, screaming. She was convinced the victim was dead and she was devastated. Even though he was visibly alive. Like this is the only time I’ve ever seen anything like that, but her reaction is the one thing I always remember when I see these videos and I see the reactions the killers have when they are told the victim is dead. Faking that kind of instant and deeply guilty, traumatic emotion would be almost impossible, I’ve seen criminals try and again I remember that woman and her face. And that was true terror at herself for what she thought she had done, I’ll never forget it.
@Jenna Mattern they ask for your name and other info when you call triple 0… they can find them to use as a witness if they really wanted. if they didn’t call, then your comment would make sense
There’s this impact video I watched before I recently got my license.
That video made me cry, seeing victims who had successful lives, a family and one was a little baby.
Everyone needs to watch that video before they drive, I thought it was stupid at first because I already knew not to take my eyes off the road but after watching that video and crying for 30 minutes, I will literally never take my eyes off of the road nor run a red light.
I am not an emotive person and i don't know if I would scream or just staying silent, that's scares me because police could misinterpret my behavior :/
I once hit the rear tire of a bicycle.. I was going very slow as it was a turn and swerved a little because a bike came out of nowhere. Anyway the man on the cycle fell down, no scratches or nothing. I made sure he's ok and apologized so much. But just that shook me up so much and I felt such remorse..
@Jenna Mattern // it was a busy intersection, there where people everywhere, when I called emergency the person on the line told me they already had a few other ppl on the line calling about the same accident and she asked me to hang up after I gave her my name and number, there was cameras everywhere and the driver didn’t run. There was no need at all for me to stay except to stare at a person who was hurt badly. Having people gather around an accident only prevents emergency and cops from getting to it.
But look, I know none of this matters to you at all, you just want the moral high ground right? Gives you a high, feeling like your telling someone off for doing something bad, right?
Not to minimize what you’re saying but when I was like 13 this 16 year old was driving on my street and we had a husky that ran into the street. She killed my dog. It was not her fault and an accident she wasn’t speeding there was nothing she could have done truly. The driver was soooo upset crying as hard as we were and even tho my dog was dead I remember feeling bad for HER. Like she was equally traumatized as we were and it was just a dog
Joseph Coffey, a tough New York City detective sergeant once said- “Everybody wants to tell their story. They are either proud of their actions or will say nearly anything to get out of the interrogation room. They can’t stop talking when they should keep their mouth shut. It is amazing how they hear: “ anything you say can and will be used against you…” and they just keep talking.”
There’s some people who are just straight up looking for trouble. I know it’s not really a popular opinion considering I’m mostly pro 2a, but some people should just not have guns, period. Hell, I see people in my day to day life that shouldn’t even be allowed to drive a car.
@box the man was protecting his family by shoving him to the ground, he never stomped anyone's head into the pavement, wtf are you saying. Then he takes several steps back afterwards and still gets shot. The fact that you're defending this dude for shooting a person while unarmed and retreating is so stupid and ignorant.
As a very strong believer in second amendment rights, I agree. He had no reason to fire when he did, if he pulled the gun and the guy continued charging, then he could’ve shot. But I think he fired a little early and this mans life could’ve been saved. Very sad
@Uomo Americano Yikes! 😬 That dude’s a total meathead. I carry myself and know plenty others who do as well: NO ONE goes around hoping they’re put in a position to even have to CONSIDER unholstering their firearm defensively.
@steeveejee thank you for talking sense. Any responsible gun owner understands trigger discipline and how you don't touch the trigger unless your life depends on it. His did not.
@G Victor that's not how that works. You don't get to shoot an unarmed man like this. He was standing there with a gun pointed at him. He had already won the fight, he just wanted to pull the trigger.
@John Morin so if the couple in question we’re parked illegally and this man confronted them and they were to shoot him, would it be this mans fault? He has no authority to confront them, but put himself in that situation. Should the people who shot him go to jail or is it his fault he put himself in that situation? Your logic honestly doesn’t due the case any justice.
I’m gonna defend my life, I’m gonna make sure to defend myself outside your house and place of business. I’m willing to go to the depths end to defend my life which is why I carry everyday im just itching to defend myself
@box He certainly was assaulted first. But there's this word called "excessive". Due to the evidence of the camera an entire room of people agreed "he was not in danger for his life and shot a man who decided to back up after seeing the gun" These things happen fast and it may seem like a foreign concept to you but you can't just claim self defense, you have to actually be in defense for the sake of your life, not in defense because your ego can't take being pushed. In no way was that guy going to stomp that guy's head. The way it played out(on film I might add) was he got pushed, guy took a step towards him, he pulls out his gun out of fear, then the big problem is the guy saw the gun and backed up, he decided to shoot him while in control. That's the problem. So that you can carry this lesson and don't catch a murder charge, once you seize control of someone who pushed you to the ground, you have zero right to pull the trigger. This is proven in this court case alone but I mean I implore you to not test the theory. Biggest lesson from this you can take is don't antagonize people when you have a weapon. No matter what happens just that start point alone is something the court will consider with your case. People like that appear as a danger to everyone else, not just the guy that pushed him. If he would have simply drawn his gun and called the cops he could have gotten the guy who pushed him a battery charge. But nope, he seemed to want to play this out to shoot him.
@M Star My experience has been the opposite; the gun owners I know are professional, safe and considerate; but I suppose it depends on who you spend time with.
If you end up having to pull your pistol or be killed it's gonna be a hell of alot more hectic and unpredictable than this... with more of a chance of you being killed. If you have any sense you pray it never comes to having to pull a gun. I love guns. He I'd be tickled if you could buy a full auto at Walmart, but there's a few folks that don't have enough respect for em replying here.
Then how he shot no one for like 25 years of carrying? He said he never had to use his gun before, he didn't fight with anyone, he never got attacked before.
@Lost In Soho : Not necessary. I got attacked a few times. I was stepping off the bus, then someone did kick me in the head from behind. I did catch the person's clothes. I was almost blacking out, I had no idea if he was armed, if he had a knife, if he was retreating, if he was planning to attack me, I have barely seen anything for like 30 seconds, my jaw almost broke. It was not a fun experience. So maybe the guy had something like that, if he injured, people had to make really fast decisions during a physical attack.
@John Morin then why do we have a court system? How far do you take thos logic? If he was a vegetarian then he wouldn’t have needed that 7-11 beef jerky? bottom line, he got himself killed by wanting that Slim Jim?
@The Notorious Artorias guns aren't allowed for civilians in the rest of the 1st world countries and they work just fine with way less violent crimes than the US, and way less police violence. Ppl gon tell u that guns getting taken is stripping you of freedom, but i'd say the opposite. As a Swede, I would feel very unsafe and not as free if everyone around me were carrying guns
@steeveejee in norway, not even the police carry guns. It's no coincidence that police violence, and criminal violence is very low there. MUCH lower than the US. Norway and finland are very similar, and their crime rates are very low too. These are all in the top 11 most free countries according to the state of liberty index. The US falls 15th. Guns strip people of their social liberty, as you always run a risk at getting shot
Miss me with that "tHey'LL tAkE ouR fReEdoM awAy" bs
When the only tool you have is a hammer every problem is looks like a nail. When I carried a gun it seemed like every day there was a time when I thought I was going to have to shoot someone. Then when I didn't have it the situation changed. And made me wonder if it caused a change in way I was acting to bring the situation on that way. So I don't carry a gun
@Sophie Burgess Glad you have it all figured out. Its a shame that we cannot just call this for what it was. A sad situation. You could blame them both but in the end shit happens. They did what they thought they had to do. Only thing left are the consequences.
@Emanuel a Swede in the depths of YouTube calling for no guns with the name "anonymous". Yall weren't just scared in WW2.. it's really a hard wired core principle ain't it?
@The Notorious Artorias I agree with you, that not all people should be gun owners. That and improper handling and storage is my only problem with gun ownership. There's a concealed carry deaths by state report that I read over the summer that supports my 'handling and storage' comment. A lot of people leaving guns where the kiddos can get them as well as people playing around and accidentally killing friends and family. It's really sad.
@daniel bloedorn Imagine if this dude went all around town all day killing people in handicapped spots without a placard. He's probably one of those people that confronts people parked legitimately in handicapped spots that have "hidden handicaps".
@Schmoopy Von Boopy : I have doubts. If someone threatens people with guns, that person can't keep his carry license and probably get a jail sentence. (If those events were not self-defense situations.)
@BB -8 Bc social media carries a liberal bias & they have algorithms to automatically delete anything based on certain keywords. Usually involving statistics & race
@box please provide a link to the video of him doing that because from what i saw was he pushed him then stop and yelled at him, but at the end of the day if jackass with a gun didn’t yell at a stranger and their kids being a male Karen this whole incident would never happen, but I guess by your logic he is allowed to bully anyone and if someone dare stand up to him he is completely in the right to kill them.
That's my main concern about gun carrying. I'm a strong believer that gun shouldn't be legal anywhere. Less guns, less accident and less ego fight turning into kills.
@box u know him?did he tell you that he'd love to do that?bc if not, in the vid, all he did was get angry at the old fuck that was circling a car woth his wife and kid in it.
I find it odd for someone to sit up ileagaly in a handy cap stall being away that some tickets are over $300.00 .if l accidentally park in one & fine out.id get out of the stall so fast. I never got a ticket for parking in a handy cap stall.
I almost always agree with self defense, even with deadly force when necessary. But I have to agree with you. We’re less than 5 mins into the interview and he’s already using keywords like “21 ft rule” and “immediate threat”. Almost as if he’s aware of self defense terminology lol and let’s not forget he instigated this. He approached the car, he searched for handicap stickers, and raised his voice at a female. He got pushed once and pulled his weapon and fired before he even knew what was going on.
@Silent Life ok well when someone attacks you. You don’t know if they are armed . Second of all you don’t have time to let them beat you up more or wait to find out if he is armed or not. Yeah that’s why that sob dead
@Erica Mercado the fact is. . . HE started the entire confrontation. . . If you come out the mall and see someone walking around your car and arguing with your mom or sister in the passenger seat you're going to walk up quickly and see what the problem is, because he's clearly not a police cop so . . .
@Erica Mercado yes because there is an adult male yelling at his girlfriend 😂, what kind of pee wee herman man is going to walk up and be like "excuse me kind sir, what seems to be the problem???". . . It's bound to be a fight in this scenario 85% of the time. . . No man is going to watch another man yell at his woman, it's basic male instinct 🤷
@Erica Mercado maybe he knew he wasn't gonna attack when the man took several steps back and turned away. What's he gonna do pull a gun out and shoot him without looking? No one's saying the push was deserved but the murder to any sane human was far far far less deserved, hurts way more people than a push.
Exactly since most of this guys were cowards through out their lives they grow old and frustrated because they never felt like a real man so they go out looking for a fight and an excuse to pull their gun out to feel like the man they were never able to be without a weapon.
To have obtain concealed weapons license and to go through any gun safety course, it's made very clear that to pull your gun and shoot someone your life has to be in immediate danger. Meaning a gun needs to be pointed at u, a gun needs to be fired in your direction or a lethal weapon (like a knife) must be in a life threatening distance. U can't have a better example then this video.
@أبو ليلى He didn’t tackle him at full speed. What’s wrong with you. Look at the video again bro.
0 likes
Jim Bob2021-04-28 01:44:43 (edited 2021-04-28 01:45:57 )
@أبو ليلى It is not alright to forcefully push someone to the ground for arguing with your wife. Gun dude should of called police to have the guy charged with assault. Instead he took it into his own hands and murdered the guy. Hope he is enjoying his time in the pokey. If you carry a gun, you better know under what circumstances you can use it. He did not..
@Silent Life God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
@cxauo God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
@I Was A Saint God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
@I Was A Saint God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
@Little Death God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
@Shane Allder God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
@Nicholi Larson God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
Exactly what I was thinking...everyday he sees ""people"" park in the handicap space and today he was gonna defend the parking spaces and himself, even if it's cost's the other person their life😰
Would he have cared if he wasn't carrying a gun? I don't think so
Confronting them was only an issue because he used deadly force unnecessarily. It helps to establish that the defendant wasn't considerate of any harm that might befall anyone else because of the interaction. The prosecution even brought up how the defendant had every right to pull his firearm.
It's your line of reasoning that doesn't stand up to any scrutiny. If you shoot an unarmed individual as they are fleeing, you've lost any hope of claiming self-defense. It would not matter if the roles were reversed. It obviously isn't justifiable.
@G Victor right so getting pushed to the ground after you were circling someone’s car and arguing with their wife is enough of a reason to kill someone? He could have taken the gun out if he feared for his life and not shot. The other man clearly backed up once he saw the gun so this man had no more reason to fear for his life. And seriously dude? Saying the guy was a nuisance so that’s enough to kill him? What about this man that was going around everyone’s car and threatening them for being parked in the wrong spot?? He wasn’t a nuisance and a murderer that should get locked up?
Exactly. There is a subset of gun nuts that have a hero/martyr fantasy and are just itching for it to come true. Most gun owners with self defense reasoning for conceal carry hope to never have to kill someone. The video is pretty damning by itself but the history this guy has is icing on the cake.
@Andrew Crenshaw good. He will very soon learn that his tough guy attitude won’t help him at all, the prison guards certainly won’t help him as he’s assaulted in prison. Just like the child and mother were unable to do anything.
@Clint.Beastwood it depends if I’m in the streets and some dude is getting tough on me over something dumb like a parking spot I’m not gonna get tough on him and hope he doesn’t have a strap on him
WikiHowFrog 903 How did none of ya’ll catch that he was being sarcastic. He’s highlighting how ludicrous it would be to assume the dad as intending to curb stomp someone.
@Taco King it wasn't just "someone else", it was his girlfriend, no man is going to watch his girlfriend argue with a man without stepping in and saying something, the guy wasn't talking nice, so the black guy isn't going to walk up and talk nice either, not to mention this little issue called racism in America, racism makes it difficult for us to trust one another, white and black and vice versa... and the guy complaining is NOT handicap, it was not his duty to walk up to that woman and say anything, just call the cops 🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️, you cannot convince me that this man would've done the same thing if he didn't have that gun... this is where guns are a problem, they make people feel a little more tougher than they were without it🤷🏾♂️
He's been carrying it around for 20+ years and in no place in this entire video did he once flaunt any sort of eagerness to use the weapon - it was more of a paranoidal stance if anything.
@Nicholas Hazel so do you think he would've been just as agressive without the gun? the man was not handicap, nor was a handicap lady waiting to get there at that time . . . so there was no reason for him to walk over there other than playing cop, just call the cops 🤷🏾♂️ ... they wound up being called anyway, this is the problem with guns america... they make people feel tougher and more confident in conflict than they are without it 🤷🏾♂️...i am 5foot8inches 135 pounds, but we all know i will win a battle against Mike Tyson or any other muscular guy if im given a loaded gun before we start fighting 😂...this is a PROBLEM that will not be solved in our lifetime.
1 like
Nicholas Hazel2021-05-31 06:23:10 (edited 2021-05-31 06:23:42 )
@DeMond SWAGGERBOY I agree with every word you said. Of course he wouldn't have reacted the same without a gun. I don't recall ever saying that owning guns was a good thing.
I said that he DID own a gun and he reacted in a way I can comprehend when he used it. Let's not conflate points here.
@box where did you see him stomp somebody’s skull in? He didn’t even violently assault the guy he just pushed him to the ground and the dude pulled a gun
@DeMond SWAGGERBOY so it's the duty to push someone to the ground for asking them not to part in a disabled spot and expect to not have any retaliation? my oh my
Why no one talks about the fact that the initial physical aggression was a massive overuse of force. He pushed him from the back on a concrete floor for a verbal altercation. People have fucking died for falling wrong. It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself. At least he helped society by terminating an animal.
@Silent Life The guy attacked by the entitled and ignorant bully, was probably terrified for his life, as anyone would be, given that some ignorant, law-breaking JERK just hit him over WORDS.
@pattioknows Legally speaking, you're right, it was technically voluntary manslaughter rather than murder; I was using it in a less literal way. The intention of my comment was to restate what happened since a certain someone used racist stereotyping to attempt character assassination on the dead man that was ultimately victimized in the end. He didn't deserve to lose his life over some poor judgments because someone else had a bone to pick.
I’m not from America myself so I can’t really comment on laws etc, but if your leaving your house with firearms then you are just looking for trouble... same here in UK with deranged gang members carrying knives for “protection”.
@steeveejee i dont understand why americans be like: EvErYoNe ShOuLd HaVe AkS, and then they are like : WhY aRe We So DiSlIkEd, and : WhY aRe OuR PriSoNs sO FuLl
@G Victor H E W A S A H U M A N. you dont value human life? i do, thats why i (almost) a vegetarian, i dont want to hurt someone by not protecting them from global warming, (which btw is gona kill modern society becuse ppl dont take it seriusly)
@DeMond SWAGGERBOY solid point! I did it once to an old, well maintained Opel Ascona (had plates of a club for old historic cars) and the driver relised I was admiring it. He low the window (I hadn't noticed him up until then) and let me to take photo of his car and showed me the interior venue of the car. However, I understood I was acting bizarre 'cause I felt a little ashamed of my indiscretion.
I carry a gun most of the time I go out, difference is I'm well aware of when and when not to use it, unlike MR Drejka here, yes the guy pushed him down but there was also a good 5 or six seconds after he pushed him that the man just stood there looking like he wanted an explanation for why this random stranger is yelling? maybe yelling at his wife and kids.
I for one thing wouldn't bother talking to someone about a stupid handicapped space at all, because in reality it doesn't matter very much.
@Emobe would he have pushed a cop in that way? . . . if hes Smart, probably NOT... the young adults of today don't take kindly to being approached by non-authority figures, and I think he knew that... but... the presence of that GUN made him a little too froggy...just call the cops, they wound up being called anyway 🤷🏾♂️...(or just become a cop, if you have the desire to boss other adults around)
@thatmaninblack i know this is a late reply, but i’m assuming you missed the part when it was mentioned that he had, on several occasions, threatened multiple people with his gun? because this wasn’t a one time thing. he had a history of abusing his fire arm. what ended up happening was an eventuality. a really fucking depressing one when you think about how it could’ve been avoided.
@CEDEREL CACEDENCE : If he did that illegally, how the authorities didn't take his carry license? It's happened in Florida, so the guy had to have a carry license. Wiki says he had 3 issues (2 of them gun-related). So the question is, if those really happened, why the police did let him go? Why the police kept the guy's carry license? Sounds like the police didn't care enough, and they did let the guy carry, even though he made multiple scary situations for others. Sounds like the police made a huge mistake.
@The Notorious Artorias Yeah that's why I'm 100% pro 2a because he's a criminal and criminals will always find a way to get a gun. So I need to defend myself against guys like him
He shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
Unfortunately, you are too correct. I am a pro gun and pro self defense guy, but I am against most (if not all) stand your ground laws and so on. I am for castle doctrine laws as long as you were not found criminally guilty, but I digress and will get to the point. I think that cases like this should be taken VERY seriously. In addition, I also think that people should be made aware of laws (through a class, etc….) when applying for a gun permit, and specifically bring up when it is and when it isn’t a proper time to use a gun against an assailant, and make them sign off on it. This would make these situations much more prosecutable, and it may even save lives. I am from Pennsylvania and I have a permit to carry, and even I am embarrassed of how it requires no actual training/qualifications and/or classes on laws when you get your permit. Because it all comes down to the most important thing….. not all “assailants” are putting your life in immediate, fatal danger… I don’t understand why the majority of the pro gun community see it as one extreme or the other and think that because someone was name calling, that it justifies taking someone’s life….. it’s rather pathetic TBH….
@The Notorious Artorias out of curiosity, and as a swede who has never even seen an actual gun in real life, why should anyone carry them? won’t a weapon like that just make any confrontation escalate and make the situation worse?
@DeMond SWAGGERBOY Nice of you to avoid the fact that he shouldn't be assaulting people in the first place. Who cares if the "youths of today don't like authority"? Last I heard that's not a right to assault people
@box when did they stamp their skull? His kids were in the store and in the car, where they most likely wouldn't be able to see everything directly. See people like you are what's wrong with the world, always exaggerating everything.
@CEDEREL CACEDENCE : Eh? The gun laws are way too strict. I think you wanted to say that because that's the truth. Anyway, if the dude kills the other one with a knife, then what do you say about knife laws? What about the victims of the "knockout game" who die? Do you blame fists for that? Would you cut off people's fists because fists are too dangerous? Do you remember the news about the Canadian guy who killed 10 people with his van? I don't remember people speaking up against cars. Blaming objects is just utterly ignorant. Don't be like that...
speaking as someone with paranoia my thought process is dread that slowly decends into a dizzing panic its way i cant have a gun, i could hurt someone that wassint even attacking me when the paranoia hits... and in a situation where im assulted by someone like this guy was i could end up using the gun on them when i should not have.
@G Victor his account of the incident didn't match up with the video. How could the man feel threatened for his life still if the guy is already backing away.
@thatmaninblack if you had watched this video and actually listened then you'd know it's because they couldn't connect him to those cases until after he shot that black dude. Once his trial started is when earlier victims said they recognised him. There's your answer. All I'm saying is, it's highly likely he was being as aggressive and threatening to that woman whose man got shot as he was to all his previous victims. So your comment makes no sense at all! If you're out there threatening and harassing people in the streets then of course people will step in! Spouse or not!
@Frial S I did watch this video when? like months or years ago? I don't remember every single word they said. You are expecting me to remember this video word-by-word when someone jumpstarted a discussion about it 7 months later? I take this as a joke. :) It's just weird how nothing happened and he didn't get caught before. In fact, I did read that they didn't get him only once because the victims ( ? ) drove away without telling anything to the police. (I think it's on Wikipedia.) Wiki says all of these incidents happened at the same place, so there is no way that the police couldn't get him or get info about him. Sounds like pretty bad police work to me. Wiki says in the first case, the people didn't want him charged, in the 2nd case, the driver drove off and didn't even call the police. The dude is a weirdo, gun or not, that's for sure.
@thatmaninblack "Drejka called the Clearwater septic tank company Kelly works for to complain, telling owner John Tyler that he didn't like the way Kelly had talked to him and that he was "lucky I didn't blow his head off."
Tyler, a gun owner himself, told the Times he was shocked.
"I said, 'I'm sorry you feel that way, that you feel that it's justified to take someone's life over a parking space,'" he said. "That was the chilling part about it when I found out who it was with the (McGlockton) situation." go read the entire article, then come back and form a proper conclusion
@Frial S : Do I really have to spend more time on this? What would be the proper conclusion anyway? Saying that the police did an excellent job? Or the victims did great, as they didn't push charges, didn't report the threat or they even left the scene without a word? Why I'm not allowed to criticize the situation again? Why do I even have to talk about this long forgot case? Can we talk about Tony Timpa instead?
@thatmaninblack maybe try reading the article explaining all incidents because then you'd realise that what you are saying is not making any sense at all. Two victims literally recognised him because of his murder and the trial being televised. So again, read up on the incidents so you yourself can realise you're wrong, or stop making judgement calls that you present as facts based off no source other than Wikipedia (lmao). Either acknowledge the fact that you don't know anything about those incidents and are not willing to read up on it, or read up on it and rectify all that you've said. You can't just lie based off nothing and then refuse to face facts when confronted with them, very Trumpian.
@Frial S : Maybe try to comment to relevant things and don't expect people remember comments and videos 6-12-24 months ago. Wikipedia has the source on the bottom. That is what Wikipedia about. You don't even know how the Wiki works. Great... Yeah, I don't know much about a long time forgotten incident, why would I? I have no idea what did we even talk about it back in the days. No, I'm not willing to read all that crap again. 332 comments. "You can't just lie based off nothing and then refuse to face facts when confronted with them, very Trumpian." - Oh, now it's politics... Just wondering what is your politics, since you are extremely rude, prejudicial, and harassing others with long time forgotten stories. Calling a Ron Paul Libertarian guy "Trumpian" is pretty nonsense. Maybe cut back your antisocial, aggressive behavior. I don't want to talk about this story, and I'm not going to read back 332 comments. What you gonna do about it? You aim a gun at me, like Drejka? Some people, seriously....
@thatmaninblack so you forgot your replies in this thread and yet reply to me with the same nonsense, does that make sense to you? So you're comfortable making judgement calls without looking into facts? That's all I'm getting out of you. So you think Wikipedia is a legitimate source? Any reason why you're not allowed to use it in academic papers?
@Frial S : No, it doesn't make sense to me why are you bothering me with this case/video I forgot a long time ago. I'm saying that Drejka is an idiot. If you think he is not, it's your problem. It's you who judging me, you even got politics into this. I think Wikipedia has sources on the bottom of the pages. Maybe you should check those. The academic papers are usually at the bottom of the pages. Stop harassing me with stupid things, I'm not going to chew myself through his whole court case, just because you decided to pull me back into this nonsese. I'm saying Drejka is an idiot and he should get time in jail (probably he is behind bars already). If you don't think that he should be in jail, it's also ok. I'm not going to get triggered by your opinion. Bye.
@G Victor you absolutely do not get to shoot somebody because they parked in a handicap spot. your lack of sympathy for the victims is absolutely terrifying.. please do not own any guns. you do not have to be an angel to not get shot for stupid reasons, whether or not they were suffering drug addictions or working fast food jobs. your lack of respect for human life is disgusting
@Mastershake You're on the side of a woman who willfully broke the law, got an attitude when told so, and her husband that fights words with physical violence ...none of the 3 involved were exactly correct. However, the woman started the whole thing. If she'd have just moved her car out of respect for the law, and not just acted entitled to violate it, this would never have happened. It isn't even a question of who was right, nobody really was . The shooter shot as if he was in fear for his life, we can't really know for certain what he was thinking. The man that hit him was foolish Showing off in front of his wife, fighting words with violence. Why didn't he just tell the guy ok, we're leaving anyway? No, he had to blindside him. Big man...not! I wouldn't have fired. Not with all of my experience. I would have had the assailant arrested. SO....go ahead, call me names, its either my gender or my assumed race, isn't it?
@DeMond SWAGGERBOY Seems the gun was the equalizer. The big guy knocked a smaller guy down in a cowardly way, blindsided him. Didn't even try to acknowledge the issue first, had absolutely no respect at all.
@Screematu22 The father was teaching his kids that its ok to break the law, parking in handicapped spots, and ok to assault anyone who dares to speak out about it.
@Mastershake Hahaha! If ANYTHING I have stated is incoherent to you, I am afraid I must reiterate your need for proper education and perhaps, some counseling. Good luck!
@mike Mike not wrong but to attack someone cause they were complaining of not having a handicap parking seems also dumb like I said I could've seen this going either way.
@mike Mike but regardless he shot someone who was fleeing with out a weapon so if he just drawn the weapon he'd been fine but regardless the court decided the case.
@Nathan Bosher im not defending his actions, but he didnt “start shit.” he was telling them to get out of the handicapped spot when they were wrongfully using it
@zbrayden definitely starting something, he’s not the parking spot police. If he told an employee and then the guy pushed him, I could see your point, but it’s not the case.
@Dark and Edgy How was he fleeing, he shoved him to the ground and stood over him. The man who was on the ground had his life in the hands of the one who pushed him.
@HyperS that split second when he pulls the gun out he takes two steps back thats considered fleeing he is no longer engaging the target. Do I believe the dude was a victim no I believe he was was some hot headed idiot but that delay when he sees the firearm counts as attack being over.
@Dark and Edgy I understand where you're coming from, I understand your side. We looked at the same evidence and came to opposite conclusions. I pity the loss of McGlockton, and his family, I just can't justify him shoving an older man to the ground for having a verbal argument with his wife. Why should Drejka wait for McGlockton to begin further assaulting him before he has the right to defend himself?
@Dark and Edgy McGlockton did disengage after seeing the gun, a level headed man would not have pulled the trigger. However, Drejka was overpowered and shoved to the ground. I genuinly believe he feared for his life, or at least, his personal safety and wellbeing. The interrogation officer asked if Drejka ordered McGlockton to back up before he fired. However, McGlockton didn't order Drejka to back up before he shoved him to the ground. Do I think McGlockton deserved to die? Definitely not. But let's face it, he was the aggressor here.
@HyperS yes definitely agree on the aggressor part and to be honest I probaly would of scream back up back up before firing but I actually have military training I'd probaly would of waiting for him to leave my sight before getting up as well then called the police for assault.
@Dark and Edgy Do you think he deserved a 20 year sentence? I think the verdict is racially driven. I am still forming my opinion and would like to learn every detail before making up my mind.
@HyperS tbh I only watched half the episode as I watch in bits and pieces so say 20 years ehhh maybe a bit extreme as to say it's racially motivated crime is stretching it he didn't make them park in that handy cap spot nor did he assault them first.
@Dark and Edgy I do feel like if you have someone berating your wife you’re going to protect them. Regardless of whatever the topic is. When Michael was pushed over the father didn’t make another aggressive move. Michael took it to an extreme because his feelings were hurt. I’ve been shoved before but I’m not a pussy who would claim I feared for my life and shot the person.
@HyperS You have an entire video showing the detail. Man illegally parks next to car illegally parked and counters a shove to the ground with lethal force as a man was disengaging. We all watched it together quite literally.
@Sophos What I mean to say, is that it is a complex moral issue. It puts gun control into question, and it's a perfect encounter to assess the current state of the US. I don't think one can ever draw a black and white conclusion.
@HyperS Not without something like video evidence, no. He, in all reality, waited until his aggressor was walking away to fire a shot. No black/white conclusion; a documented conclusion. Defender can say he was scared and panicked but what the fuck kind of excuse is that to ending this other man's life? I'd give him a fair chance if that attack ensued but no, the guy thought that trigger pull out. We saw it in its entirety.
This was a politically motivated railroading. Nothing he said could have helped. The cops and prosecutors originally and correctly said it was self defense. This guy who couldn't walk without assistance was on the ground while a guy 1/2 his age and twice his size was over him.
@tarstarkusz Don't take the bar exam Bubba 😀. Even at the time, the guys who wrote the law, said this was not what it was for. Drejka is a raging, bully that has pulled his gun multiple times on unarmed citizens for trivial reasons. He was raging and pointing in an aggressive manner at a Woman and Small Kiddos.
@Alvan It was initially ruled a self defense shooting, which is what it was. What he allegedly did on some other day is irrelevant. He was not charged until the enemy of the people ginned up mobs against him all based on race.
@Ben McConnon The local officials(elected) who made that decision, made a mistake! They made a hastt decision, that doesn't mean it was right! Their decision also avoided a Toxicology Screen for Drejka, not incidentally. .Anyway, That's why we have trials so that QUALIFIED people can make the decision. You're so biased, that you don't get it. But the true facts all line up against you. --- Published Aug. 23, Jeff Brandes, a Republican state senator who had a central role in revising Florida's stand your ground law in 2017, said the statute should not apply in the recent high-profile Clearwater killing of Markeis McGlockto
@Ben McConnon You forgot some options: tarstarkusz is a bigot, or racist or Troll who doesn't care about the laws, or Drejka's history of pulling a gun or making threats and assaulting people. (worse assaults than what McGlockton did btw). The guy who wrote the law, says this was a bad shoot, that's proof enough for me.
@tarstarkusz What he did on anther day is not irrelevant if he has a pattern and practice of doing this exact same thing. And if there were multiple witnesses, and a Police report noting an unsecured firearm at the time the stopped him. He also Lied to the initial investigators; so again their decision wasn't based on all the facts. Learn from Drejka's mistakes and common sense. Don't be a Drejka.
@Alvan No. Stop lying. They had the video tape from the beginning and that is why he wasn't initially charged.
Stand your ground had absolutely nothing to do with this case. It was not a stand your ground defense. He could not retreat because he was pinned to the ground. The opposite of stand your ground is duty to retreat. You cannot have a duty to do something you cannot do. Duty to retreat ENDS when you can no longer retreat. If you retreat into a dead end and can no longer run because the path is blocked by a building or obstacle, you can now use deadly force assuming it is otherwise authorized.
That guy pushed drejka to the ground and then ran in for the finishing. He pulled the gun in self defense while pinned to the ground. That guy was going to cause him severe bodily injury. It was a political lychmobing.
I know that defense lawyer was just doing what he's paid to do, but damn did I want to slap him when he had the balls to say Drejka was the "true victim." Bro, your client just turned this family into a single parent household and the worst he suffered was a couple scrapes and a bruised ego. Marquis and his family are the real victims here, full stop.
I agree that he shouldn't have shot the guy, but there was no need to shove him to teh ground, and I can understand why ( in the moment) he felt the need to pull a gun.
@Uhuh.223 You're right, he was yelling at them for parking ILLEGALLY. There was no need to assault the guy first, especially when they were in the wrong. 🤦🏿♂️
I totally agree, I can't believe that puppeteer, kiss ass of attorney, how can he sleeps at night? To have the audacity to stand up in court and defend someone that the rest of the world knows is guilty.
@Ninja Shogun yeah but unfortunately having your kids near you doesn’t shield you from being killed infront of them- there is not magical force that does that. don’t assault people in front of your kids and chances of you being killed or assaulted back infront of them decreases significantly
@Erica Mercado girl wtf. he shouldn't die for trying to protect his wife and kids. even if he did shove the guy, that doesn't mean he needs to be shot for it...
@Aditi Joshi this is America what do you expect. Come on don’t act surprised. I mean I know not to go around putting my hands on people, no matter what the verbal argument is. Law of probability ( in America atleast) and what everyone should already know is put your hands on a person first = the person will retaliate even if that means with a gunshot
@Viscus No he shouldn't have, that dude even has a history of starting fights just to pull his gun he's an actual menace. The dud pushed him because like I said his vulnerable wife and kids were being yelled at
@AntiSocial Pleb Ok so basically you wouldn't have done anything because you're passive even though they were screaming at your wife and kids. Also it doesn't matter if he knew he had a gun or not because he's still yelling at them smh
@Uhuh.223 You do realise there are more options than just attacking him or doing nothing, right? There's a third option which is to discuss the issue rationally, which clearly he, and you, swept under the rug. Also, the reason why I pointed out that he didn't know he had a gun, is because in your previous comment it sounded as if you were trying to justify his actions because he had a gun on him- but at the time, he wasn't aware of that.
@AntiSocial Pleb Really doing everything in your power to defend this guilty man its crazy, and why would you think a man who parked illegally to yell at a woman and her 2 kids who weren't driving for parking illegally, is a man who wants to be reasoned with? In other situations maybe they could be reasoned with, but this dude has a whole past of starting altercations to pull his gun on people.
@Uhuh.223 Yes, a man who parked illegally can be reasoned with. Tf are you on about? Also, I'm not saying he should have shot the guy, but at the end of the day, he was the one who assaulted him first 🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️
@Uhuh.223 Should he have shot him? No. Should he have pushed him? No. I'm not trying to justify the killing, but the idea that the guy who shot him was completely at fault, and the guy who got shot was just an innocent victim is idiotic.
@Zwenk Wiel If I remember correctly 2 kids were in the car and 1 was taken out with the dad. Also if that's how you see it I don't care you're still wrong
@Zwenk Wiel dude, did you see that long ass pause before he shot him after he pulled the gun out? if nothing was said, there was no longer a threat.. if he shot him sooner I can see it possibly being an impulse reaction but he had the gun pointed at him waaaay too long to justify shooting him AFTER he has taken a few steps back.
@azathoth 988 this wasn’t a reasonable reaction though this guy was just itching to use his weapon he didn’t use the weapon defuse the situation he shot him as he was backing up just wanted to shoot that fucking gun
God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
@Zwenk Wiel God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
@Srb God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
@Real Gondal yeah we all saw that but was a shot to the chest needed? This was the first time he pulled a gun on someone he has done it before, look at the reports. Stop bringing race into everything. This situation didn’t require a gun at that moment.
@Mandavi Roldan he's doing his job. Someone literally has to defend these people to the best of their ability, it's their right. And if they don't perform to the best of their ability, they take the risk of being sued for misconduct. Quit looking at these thing through the lens of an emotional child. Do you honestly think that we should just throw our arms up and say "guilty" just because its obvious he did it? Everyone has a right to a fair trial. Grow up
@Joxman2k So you think him getting tackled was reasonable? He was a deadly accident waiting to happen, if you live in America, expect people to carry a weapon and use them to kill you if you provoke them. Fuck, this situation is just so sad. That dad obviously had issues if he sees it fit to tackle a guy like that, it's just sad that the one he tackled was carrying. If he hadn't been carrying a gun, the dad would have been convicted of assault.
@Ed I tend to agree, Ed. Drejka was attacked by surprise from behind, shoved heftily from behind/ left side that he fell to the floor and then overreacted, yes, but the initial aggression came from the victim. I do not condone what Drejka did, but he didn't deserve 20 years imprisonment, that was far too excessive - far worse criminals get less for far worse crimes.
This was so hard to watch.... the dad was literally backing up and even putting his hands up while moving backwards once he saw the gun, yet this POS still shot him. There was no threat after the push happened.... this guy deserves to be tortured in prison.
This man was looking for someone to shoot, when the detective asked him did he ever think about the fact that the person in the car might become confrontational and he said yes but I'm prepared for that so clearly he was waiting for the opportunity to shoot someone this man was the aggressor and he committed murder this was the 5th time he brandished his weapon on someone and he has absolutely no remorse
Diana Benson, Exactly. That "yes, but I'm prepared" gave him away. He was looking for an excuse to shoot someone. This was his 5th (known) time that he pulled his weapon on a person. He came there every day to mark 'his' sad little territory and to look for an opportunity and finally, he saw this easy target to play Cops and Robbers 'with'.
How about just don’t put your hands on people? That guy is dead because his only recourse in the event of an argument was to violence. So when his violence was trumped by that of another I am supposed to feel pity?Nope. I only hope more incipient aggression is met with responsive brutality. Maybe if this becomes a trend people will stop attacking other people for nothing more than the exchange of words.
@Maximos Wolfe yeah man exactly. they are saying its bad to use harsh words and to attack someone is a acceptable but it is not acceptable to defend yourself from violence.
@Maximos Wolfe So you're saying the answer to violence is more violence? If your friends jumped off a bridge, would you too? How is this common sense in any way. If a white man died instead of a black man, I'm sure you would've said differently.
Did not look unhinged to me. It seemed like a well-calculated move - took his time to aim, probably had been waiting for this moment his whole pathetic life.
@Maximos Wolfe how about dont get into the face of someone's wife and kids unless you want to get into a fight? You trying to say that you're going to try to talk and be sensible to a grown ass man shouting at your wife and kids about how you parked?
@jayson phillips that's just not true. I love how you make the government and stuff effective in your theories. The planet is literally dying and they do nothing. Their corrupt and useless, with incompetent people at the top
@Clown we can't assume his motivations, we can only assess his statements against the video evidence. He may have genuinely felt endangered, but his perception was obviously wrong, so it would be a mitigating factor, not an absolution of guilt. Amber Guyger, the cop who murdered a guy in his own apartment, thought he was an intruder in her apartment. Just because she felt in danger doesn't mean she wasn't negligent in her actions.
That sounded really weak, didn't? Like he was trying to imply that McGlockton wasn't really in the process of retreating when he pulled the gun, even when it's clear as day he was.
Yes, extremely weak defense. Why no just say that the defendant percieved a threat just having been knocked down and didn´t really see him reatreating. In fact after retreating you can see the victim kinda moving a little forwards. I don´t see how it can be that hard to claim reasonable doubt that he didn´t know if he was safe. Might not have saved him from a guilty verdict but video artifacts? Really bro? Maybe I should become a lawyer. Doesn´t seem that hard to top this performance.
B Z2020-08-21 04:06:48 (edited 2020-08-21 04:07:48 )
avenderiel the lawyer probably already knew he was done for & gave a bad defense. he pretty much already screwed himself over in the interview. u can’t save a sinking ship, but u still have to do ur job. maybe u should be a lawyer? not if u don’t realize these situations.
The detective doing the questioning was so incredibly professional. Think about all the questions he asked, the order in which he asked them, and how much information he obtained.
Shame. Only a dangerously violent person would react the way he did to an argument. He is the one who instigated the violence.
Mike started an argument. That is no reason for starting a physical aggression. Furthermore, he could have been killed had he fell wrong on the concrete floor.
People die all the time from falling wrong. His reaction was 100% justified to a life threatening aggression.
It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself but at least he got rid of that animal. (whoever resorts to violence in an argument is an animal).
Why no one talks about the fact that the initial physical aggression was a massive overuse of force. He pushed him from the back on a concrete floor for a verbal altercation. People have fucking died for falling wrong. It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself. At least he helped society by terminating an animal.
@southside yeah seriously. Dude assaults him out of nowhere. I agree that he didn’t deserve to get shot and killed but damn people. Don’t be shovin people over parking spots. How about “hey buddy what the hell ya doin”
He shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
@Michael Zomsuv you see after he pushed him that guy pointed out his gun the person who pushed backed up and was going to the store if that guy didn't shoot him he could have pressed charges now do you understand?
The wannabe military/cop thing is pretty common among hard core gun nuts. That's probably why they have such a strong need to have so many guns, to make themselves feel like military.
Thank God, but as we’ve seen far too often, this is the rule for most police personalities, not the exception. I think he’s overdoing it because he’s trying to be as cop-like as possible
All you people that can’t mind your own business I’m begging you to insert yourself into my business. The police can take care of the no parking and handicapped parking . Stay the hell out of peoples business , be it gay , religion,race or anything that does not concern you . If you see someone getting hurt or treated badly of course the rules change .
Bruh I was thinking the same thing. I wanna know what makes people talk like that. I’m guilty of it sometimes when talking to a professional of any kind but I don’t pretend to know more than them but I know people that think they do
@Linda Niemkiewicz Remember that Trump was the one who posted a full ad in the NYTimes saying the Central Park 5 should be executed and stood by that statement even after DNA evidence freed them.
@Logan , imagine half of your friends talk a certain way, and your teachers talk a certain way, and maybe even one of your parents too. Eventually, without your consent, you will likely find yourself talking in a similar way. For example, if you moved to a different part of the country, where the "normal" accent is different.
Now consider firearms enthusiasts. You are correct, that this group of people are not all police/military, though a good portion of them are, including many (in my experience, most) of the instructors.
So even if you hate this way of talking, it's not necessarily that the speakers actively chose to use it, I'd argue that it's often subconcious.
@Bo Riddley Because a man trying to stand up for his family when they are accosted by some lunatic is pretty normal contrary to someone who shots an unarmed man over a parking space.
@Sir Dankleberry Nope, but if you are such a horrible shot that you need 20+ rounds to hit a target, you probably shouldn't be handling firearms to begin with
@Sir Dankleberry You really only need a bootknife. This one time, I had a Tech 9, and I thought I was all badass, so shot it over my head and a bunch of rocks fell on me, and I dropped my gun. When I came to, this crazy guy with a sword came it at me and it wasn't a gun that saved me that day, it was just a simple bootknife. That being said, it's all in the reflexes.
I was the main suspect in my brother in law's murder about 15 years ago. I was 18 and dumb and I sung like a bird to the cops. I was innocent and the killer was caught a few weeks later. I didn't once consider that I should call an attorney.
Cops routinely propose suggestions because it raises suspicions if they just agree with all their suggestions, and they usually won't remember the suggestion if it wasn't true, and will change it if a conflicting suggestion is given.
Very common tactic. Make the suspect commit to lies then keep note of them. Chances are they will say something in the future to the contrary. Then you have a very strong reason in court to be suspicious that he is lying under oath. It's a very smart strategy
Taylor Loudenback ya I think my current school has official city police officers for our security guards, but my school before the current one had just plain people with no license wearing a shirt that said security
Drejka shot him once to stop further violence from Marquise who was high on MDMA and had a hx of drug abuse and assaulting a police officer. Funny that fact is NEVER mentioned. It was a very measured and controlled response given the high-pressure/adrenaline-fueled situation. Marquise just happened to bleed out b/c Drejka was a good shot but Marquise initiated the violence over a parking spot and got taught the ultimate lesson to keep your hands to yourself. Only reason Drejka was convicted was b/c he willingly cooperated with police instead of lawyering up and didn't immediately and repeatedly claim he feared for his life.
@HisokaMorrow he shoved him as a warning to back off, there are ppl who would have punched him, but what man argues with a woman he doesn’t knows or who wasn’t bothering him. He could have reported that shit to the store or the cops, but he was being a George Zimmerman. If he wanted to police ppl, he should have joined the academy, but his ass wouldn’t have been able to hang because he’s sorry and he would have shot many. I’m a woman and even I had fights in school.
@Sabrason Marquise was defending his girlfriend from Drejka, at least it could be argued better than Drejka was protecting himself from Marquise considering he was stepping away.
I am pro 2nd amendment, but I completely understand how some people would be against it because of people like Drejka. The guy can't fight, but is willing to put himself in controversial situation only because of the gun he carries in concealment. He is a coward.
@Cori K Not really fair to compare this case to Zimmerman. In that instance, Zimmernman's attacker was repeatedly striking and attacking him, whereas in this instance Drejka fired well after Marquise had backed off, stopped attacking and was no longer a threat.
@Cale David Zimmerman was told by police and back off, he wasn’t a cop like Michael wasn’t, he could have watched Trayvon from a distance as so could Michael, he could have taken down license plate number.
@Cori K That's true, and I can appreciate that Zimmerman's case is very controversial, but consider the fact that Martin attacked Zimmerman and inflicted a head injury (there are photographs you can find here: https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/media/images/60317000/jpg/_60317077_zimmermancomp.jpg). I'm not saying that Zimmerman's situation was ideal - a young man lost his life - but calling Drejka another Zimmerman isn't really fair considering Zimmerman killed in legitimate self-defense and Drejka didn't.
I think it's important to be careful about tarring everyone with the same brush when there's nuance to these cases, because it weakens accusations of actual misconduct and discredits people who are genuine.
@Cale David I don’t feel you instigating a situation being that you are the one with a gun is self defense. Trayvon did not start with Zimmerman, Zimmerman approached him. It seems like us blacks can’t mind our business enough without someone bothering us. If a crime is happening, nonpolice officers need to call the police. If I’m stealing out the store you are shopping in, you have no right to attack me because it’s non of your business, contact the proper channels.
@HisokaMorrow Drejka shot to stop, not kill...if he wanted to kill him he would've emptied the clip in Marquise. He shot ONE time = very controlled and measured response given the situation. Unfortunately for Marquise, Drejka was an experience gun owner and a very good shot. A verbal confrontation is NO reason to lay hands on somebody..... EVER! Hopefully some of you #$%^#$& learned that lesson or you may find yourselves taking the dirt nap with Marquise because of a gun owner who you cross. KEEP YOUR HANDS TO YOURSELF AND DON'T START FIGHTS WITH PEOPLE YOU DON'T KNOW!
@HisokaMorrow Of course it is, you've never taken a self-defense course, have you. You don't have to wait to be seriously injured before you defend yourself when there is no other option. The point of self-defense is to AVOID serious injury, not PREVENT additional serious injury.
@Sabrason you obviously didn’t watch or comprehend because he said he couldn’t fight nor has he ever. If you are carrying a gun, you don’t go out inciting shit, that’s exactly why his ass is in jail. Hopefully he doesn’t make it to see the light of day.
@Piero Fasulli All the more reason Zimmerman should be in jail because he having a gun instigated a situation instead of avoiding it and got his ass beat and couldn’t take it like a man. Him getting off was some strings being pulled by his father, just like with Casey Anthony.
@Piero Fasulli you on the internet, seems you know so much, look that shit up, how you posting and don’t know the whole story. He was told not to engage, 4 times. He even said he was walking around and it was raining, so he looked suspicious. He should be in jail. That’s what’s wrong with Karens and Kens, always think they know and own everything. If a crime isn’t happening, mind your business.
@Cori K he never talked or engaged with Trayvon before Trayvon assaulted him, and he only took out his gun when Trayvon try to steal it from him. night and day compared to Drejka case who actually shot for no reason
@Piero Fasulli that’s Zimmerman alleged story which is bullshit, he instigated the whole shit, point blank period, Trayvon didn’t sneak him, he walked up to him.
@Piero Fasulli plus if you look at the photos from where his body is, there is no where for you to park unless you drive up on the lawn along the walk path, so what, did he drive up on it and follow him?
@Piero Fasulli it’s easy to believe what others tell you to believe when a system tells you that blacks are bad and constantly paints the narrative for you, if only they broadcast the same amount of shit that other groups do equally. Imagine how many cases like Zimmerman or Casey Anthony that subtracts from the true numbers. This world is fucking sick.
@Piero Fasulli George Zimmerman was following a minor home. If anything, Trayvon had the best defense in this case because he was being followed by some strange man. From my understanding, Trayvon even called someone because he felt as if he was being followed.
@Cori K >It seems like us blacks can’t mind our business enough without someone bothering us.
Martin was casing houses to rob. I'd hardly call that minding his own business. And he attacked Zimmerman. That's been proven.
I appreciate that you feel there's a lot of prejudice and discrimination, and there absolutely is in some cases like the one in this video. But idolizing thugs like Martin and acting as if Zimmerman was in the wrong purely out of a sense of tribalism only makes you look bad.
>If I’m stealing out the store you are shopping in, you have no right to attack me You have no right to be stealing in the first place. What kind of example is that? Or is stealing from stores normal behaviour for you?
@Cori K Drejka did nothing illegal. McGlockton was high on MDMA, had a hx of drug abuse and assaulting a police officer and committed the first crime by assaulting Drejka....that's why many legal experts agreed that it was a justified shooting.
@Sabrason Michael should of kept his mouth to himself and not started a argument over a handicapped spot he can’t even use. He should of told the store manager and that would be the end of his involvement in the matter. Then the victim would of never been killed bc there would be no need to push Michael if he would of minded his own business.
@Borfis Jort or he could of minded his business and not say anything to the wife to begin with verbally attacking somone and circling their car ....while their kids are with them over a simple parking spot
@Borfis Jort the whole over all point is he should of minded his business they parked in the handy cap spot just to run into the gas station ...they would of been out the spot in a couple more minutes bottom line it was not in his place to even say anything to that family that's why he is convicted now
@Borfis Jort well legally, if I think someone approaching me is about to bring harm to me, I can legally assault you, you weren’t there no I, you approach someone aggressively and see what happens to you. I’m done on the matter and I said what I said.
Even while being interviewed in prison clothes this wannabe cop couldnt grasp the fact that maybe aggressively challenging someone doing something as harmless as parking in a handicapped spot without a badge, then pulling a gun on and shooting the husband when he arrives to defend his family from you, was the wrong way to go about the situation. This idiot literally said he wouldnt change a thing about what he did that day. I hope he rots away in prison.
Parking is a disabled bay is not a harmless act, that does not excuse murder but let's be clear, the victim and his wife behave selfishly and violently
He did not deserve to die but he and his wife were not blameless
@Jeffrey Bungle how is parking in a disabled bay a harmful act? It's there to make it a little easier for disabled people to get to their cars... That's literally it
@Jeffrey Bungle uh no, disabled people CAN shop. They just use a different car parking spot and walk a little further. That's literally the only way they're impacted. Don't try to excuse his behaviour.
Really makes sense to allow civilians to stroll around with guns "most of their adult life" doesn't it? I wonder how the rest of the world gets by without guns?
@Ding Dong the law said that guy is guilty. so what is your point? everyone breaks laws everyday. as long as you dont harm anyone its not a big deal. parking in a handicap spot is no big deal. unless you make it one. this Drejka guy decided to make it his problem. and he got what he wanted.
@RNDA Does not warrant but might GET you murdered. So why push instead of asking politely what the problem was? All he needed to do was to apologize (or even remain quiet) and leave the scene. When he pushed him to the ground, game changed. You do realize that if you slam your head to the asphalt after a push like that, it can be deadly?
@BLUT WURST Parking at a handicap spot is annoying and disrespectful for the community rules. Commenting on it is understandable and may lead to a verbal confrontation if/when the parking party is not too sophisticated. The whole situation changed the second he put his hands on the guy. That was totally unnecessary and escalated the situation. All he needed to do was to sit in his car and drive away ignoring the complainer. They would happily live their lives today.
@Decrepit Elmo Well as you saw, it did. I'd say it's an insane jump to start pushing arguing strangers to the ground. You never know if they're sane or not.
@Decrepit Elmo And that was never my argument. What I said was had he not pushed him, he would most likely be now alive.
0 likes
Jon Williams2020-09-14 09:47:07 (edited 2020-09-14 09:47:45 )
All you gotta do is make a conversation about the other person’s wellbeing. “Ma’am, I’m sorry to bother you but the police drive around this store a lot and I don’t want you to get a ticket for being in the handicap spot on accident. Just lookin out for you!”
Or he could've just minded his business... But he would never do that because he already admitted (without realizing he did) that he didn't care if an altercation ensued because he knew he had a gun..............
Or just mind your own business and let the police do their job to tell people they're not handicap and they have to move or get a ticket. Let them take a ticket instead of causing a altercation.
who knows who said what exactly during that exchange. I'm not sure but I think he said it was almost personal to him at the beginning, taking up the handicapped space. And that it happens often. He was annoyed, so I can understand why he just told them to move. It's innocent what they did but still illegal. You don't really tell a criminal hmm just looking out for you, don't kill that guy. Not his job to reprimend people, but still I get that it's not his job either to be nice to careless people.
@Ula G A "criminal"?? 🙄 Hope you didn't jaywalk today because, according-to-you, that would make you a criminal...
The Murderer Criminal was willing to kill over a parking spot... He knew that he was willing since he admitted he was fine with instigating a confrontation because he had his "force multiplier"... I'd rather be a parking space criminal than a murdering criminal...
@rachybaby72 lol I agree with you, all I was saying is you don't HAVE to be nice to people who technically don't deserve it. He overreacted (the lightest word to use here), which kinda makes sense psychologically since subconsciously he was already prepared to fire. Only pointing out you should, but sadly most likely won't be nice to people who break the law (law you apparently care about). No justification, just saying that the original comment and its solution wasn't so obvious in this situation.
Jennifer C if someone doesn’t have a handicap placard then they have no right to park in a handicap spot. It is a crime to park in one without a valid placard.
@Darth Balgarus It's a crime to jaywalk. It's a crime to smoke weed. It's a crime to kill. Which one is worse? Which one is a four-alarm fire? Which one do you normally get thrown on jail for? 🙄
Ula knew what he was doing when he chose to use the word "criminal", and 'who knew what words were exchanged' is bull$hit. He was trying to impugn the victim's character and blame him for his own death. Disgusting...
@D@rth Balgarus Pt. 2: Oooh, and I LOVE that you revealed your tell with an opinion: "severely". Not 'punished', but "severely punished". Thank you for (easily) telegraphing your true motive. :-D You're Sick...
Does he think he's drinking beers with the boys? He's talking like he's trying to impress people, not like his answers could land him in jail for decades. Christ.
He’s acting like a fanboy because odds are he’s a failed police officer and always wanted to be police officer his whole life. He probably thinks the cops are on his side what a naive fool lol
Is it normal for lawyers to say someone that was murdered simply “expired” like this psychopath’s lawyer did? That really irked me like how could you say he “expired” it makes it sound like he died by natural causes, not that your client litterally shot and killed him over a parking spot
to be fair, a defense attorney's job is to represent their clients interests and speak on their behalf. Sometime the words you use have negative connotations that imply guilt. Even though we as the audience know he was guilty after watching this, the lawyers still have the duty to make sure that people are treated as "innocent until proven guilty" throughout the proceedings since even the shittiest of human beings have rights to due process.
Anyone who carries should also be taught how to avoid conflict, and how to de-escalate a conflict, or even leave the area if possible. Discharge of a firearm is a last-ditch option, when retreat is not possible, and bodily harm is imminent. None of these were observed by the shooter. This is one interview that IK really didn't care to hear much from the shooter, as he initiated the conflict himself. "Feeling" threatened is not sufficient cause for the use of deadly force. Police do not have a duty to withdraw and disengage, but they are still trained to de-escalate, and even they fail to do that at times. I have carried for over 25 years, but fully understand the need to restrain myself, and to differentiate between "feeling" threatened, and actually being in imminent danger. It was clear that the victim began to withdraw when the shooter presented a firearm, and at that point the shooter had already stopped the threat before any shots were fired. Brandishing a firearm is far less serious than homicide, and much easier to defend under the circumstances. The shooter could have left without firing a shot, but chose to retaliate rather than to defend himself. It is a shame the victim did not get that opportunity, especially when it appears he was defending his loved ones from a potential threat as well.
Yeah, basically this guy had just built himself up over the years to be some sort of vigilante hero (he'd already had 4 previous altercations). It's really not got anything to do with his command of gun protocol, it's got everything to do with his self-image, and maybe some fantasy of a hyper-escalated sense of threat in his head.
A person like Drejka apparently cannot tell the difference between assault and self defense, and assumes no one else can either. People with his attitude should not even own a firearm, let alone carry one. Prison is the best place for him and anyone else who would act likewise. Michael McLaughlin had every right and reason to defend his wife and children from Drejka, and he did so without the use of lethal force. The defense attorney is as stupid as he is ignorant. I'm glad the jury had enough sense to interpret the situation for what it was.
He feels so educated on gun use but doesn't know that shooting because you are afraid of some kicks is absolutely absurd.. He just had a sick fantasy of saving his own life with a gun and being able to brag about it
@nunya I know they can easily kill, I have a black belt in karate. But still don't shoot until they are coming closer and "some kicks" aren't formulated by him like he felt life threatened.
@Maaike Rommens I agree, the guy was clearly moving away from him. It just seemed to me you were downplaying what kicks can do, but it wasn't a factor in this case.
also, the narrator says you would have "no need" to be in a defensive state of mind after being shoved over 5 feet onto the concrete. He said the defendent "appealed to extremes"... That is spoken by someone who has never been completely assaulted and nose stuck into a book.
@Rainy Days haha no. Adrenaline would have dissipated at that point because he believed the police were on his side, and now he was safe, if anything he would felt sluggish from the body releasing large amounts of adrenaline from firing the gun. In an altercation he started. Weak people look for power.
St. Matthew 6 Take heed that you do not your justice before men, to be seen by them: otherwise you shall not have a reward of your Father Lord God, the Great King who is in heaven.
2 Therefore when thou dost an almsdeed, sound not a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be honoured by men. Amen I say to you, they have received their reward.
3 But when thou dost alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth.
4 That thy alms may be in secret, and thy Father Lord God, the Great King who seeth in secret will repay thee.
5 And when ye pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites, that love to stand and pray in the synagogues and corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men: Amen I say to you, they have received their reward.
6 But thou when thou shalt pray, enter into thy chamber, and having shut the door, pray to thy Father Lord God, the Great King in secret: and thy Father Lord God, the Great King who seeth in secret will repay thee.
7 And when you are praying, speak not much, as the heathens. For they think that in their much speaking they may be heard.
8 Be not you therefore like to them, for your Father Lord God, the Great King knoweth what is needful for you, before you ask him.
9 Thus therefore shall you pray: Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name.
10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
11 Give us this day our supersubstantial bread.
12 And forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors.
13 And lead us not into temptation. But deliver us from evil. Amen.
14 For if you will forgive men their offences, your heavenly Father will forgive you also your offences.
15 But if you will not forgive men, neither will your Father Lord God, the Great King forgive you your offences.
16 And when you fast, be not as the hypocrites, sad. For they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Amen I say to you, they have received their reward.
17 But thou, when thou fastest anoint thy head, and wash thy face;
18 That thou appear not to men to fast, but to thy Father who is in secret: and thy Father Lord God, the Great King who seeth in secret, will repay thee.
19 Lay not up to yourselves treasures on earth: where the rust, and moth consume, and where thieves break through and steal.
20 But lay up to yourselves treasures in heaven: where neither the rust nor moth doth consume, and where thieves do not break through, nor steal.
21 For where thy treasure is, there is thy heart also.
22 The light of thy body is thy eye. If thy eye be single, thy whole body shall be lightsome.
23 But if thy eye be evil thy whole body shall be darksome. If then the light that is in thee, be darkness: the darkness itself how great shall it be!
24 No man can serve two masters. For either he will hate the one, and love the other: or he will sustain the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve Lord God, the Great King and mammon.
25 Therefore I say to you, be not solicitous for your life, what you shall eat, nor for your body, what you shall put on. Is not the life more than the meat: and the body more than the raiment?
26 Behold the birds of the air, for they neither sow, nor do they reap, nor gather into barns: and your heavenly Father Lord God, the Great King feedeth them. Are not you of much more value than they?
27 And which of you by taking thought, can add to his stature by one cubit?
28 And for raiment why are you solicitous? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they labour not, neither do they spin.
29 But I say to you, that not even Solomon in all his glory was arrayed as one of these.
30 And if the grass of the field, which is to day, and to morrow is cast into the oven, Lord God, the Great King doth so clothe: how much more you, O ye of little faith?
31 Be not solicitous therefore, saying, What shall we eat: or what shall we drink, or wherewith shall we be clothed?
32 For after all these things do the heathens seek. For your Father Lord God, the Great King knoweth that you have need of all these things.
33 Seek ye therefore first the kingdom of Lord God, the Great King, and his justice, and all these things shall be added unto you.
34 Be not therefore solicitous for to morrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof.
Word of the Blessed Lord God, the King. Thank You Blessed Lord God, the King and Savior Jesus Christ.
All you great numerous enemies; the enemy of the holy death of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ on the Cross of Calvary; the prince of darkness and iniquity, the father of all liars; I stand on the death of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ and offer His pains, wounds, and the Precious Blood of His left hand to the Eternal Father Lord God for your downfall, your destruction and your scourging. Amen. Precious Blood of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ - reign in me and in the lives of all men. Amen.
O holy loving Father, Lord God, the King of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Who protected the Israelites of old in His holy wings in the dryness of the cold and hot desert; I offer You the holy death of my Master and Savior, Jesus Christ, for the protection of Your people who are scattered all over the world. May the Blood and water wash and strengthen, save and cleanse us that we might find home in the Sacred Side of Your Holy Son that opens for all men. Amen. Sacred Side of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - be our home for safety. Amen.
Omnipotent and Omniscient Lord God, Lord God of Elijah and the prophets, look at the Sacred Head of Your only-begotten Holy Son and have mercy. Arise and save Your people. I offer You all the shame, the pains, the wounds and the Precious Blood from the Sacred Head of Your Holy Son for all Your children who are living in these perilous times. Strengthen our true faith through the mockery of Your Holy Son, Lord Jesus Christ, and save us through the Precious Blood from His Sacred Head. May we, through the sufferings of Your Holy Son, Jesus Christ, learn to suffer in You and die in You. Amen. Holy tortures of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - increase our true faith. Amen.
Merciful and holy loving Father Lord God, Your wish is that all men shall be saved. Kindly look on Your rejected and condemned Son Who suffered many tortures and will suffer many through the sins of Your people. Look and see what sin has done to your only-begotten Holy Son. I offer for all Your people who are living in these ungodly and wicked days, all the tortures, pains, rejection and shame of your Son, Lord Jesus Christ, to You, for the true faith to withstand trials and holy patience to withstand long torture. May they through the suffering of Your only Holy Son, fight to the end. Amen. Our Lord God, the King's torture - increase our true faith. Precious Blood of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - save us. Amen.
That’s what I’m saying. I know from prior experience that if this had happened in a predominantly white neighborhood it would have been there in under 10
How much the dad moved towards him changed so many times. “One step, almost two, he twitched, he moved, his feet said he was coming towards me, a couple feet” he knows that the poor dad didn’t come towards him but he needed some sort of argument for what he did. And failed miserably at it
The moment he starts realizing that the cops aren't patting him on the back and complimenting him is priceless. This dude is acting like he fouled somebody in basketball instead of shooting someone. He makes responsible gun owners look awful.
@gour Ranga he can defend himself, but with reasonable force to the threat presented. Shooting the man was unreasonable. It was excessive seeing as he just pushed him and was unarmed.
The only problem with that statement is there are far too many gun owners who would probably do what he did, only they haven't been stuck in a situation like this yet. Too many gun owners think they are responsible but probably aren't.
It’s almost like something like this is bound to happen as if you let the public own military equipment it’s quite possible some people will be irresponsible.
@gour Ranga why did you bring race into it literally nothing to do with race a man was trying to provoke a female alone in the car and her husband came out to defend her and got murdered people need to decide who is handicapped or or not or illegally parked
@Lex who mentioned a shotgun? What about an AR15, with tactical pistols, bullet proof vests and bump stocks? What about Las Vegas? What about the school shootings you have it seems every month? Everyone’s a “responsible gun owner” until they decide they aren’t anymore. You can talk about good areas and bad areas until the cows come home. We have a few bad districts in inner cities too. Yet we don’t have the same murder and violent crime rate. As I’ve said before, keep your guns, you can’t solve the issue you have. Nobody is giving them back. All I’m saying is it’s a stupid way to run a society and you should just approach it as a mistake the US made historically, rather than something to be proud of, as the entire world can see the violence, the over zealous police. The paranoia every time someone puts their hands in their pockets in an argument. We can all see it, and when we hear BS about good guys and bad guys we all know full well that we aren’t living in some criminal controlled gangland and things can be extremely peaceful and non-tyrannous without the need to own military equipment.
@Shyann Richards I don't like able-bodied people, especially if they come across thuggish parking in handicap spaces either but if I was carrying a gun, I definitely wouldn't say anything I might report it to the police, but that would be the extent of it. It's not worth saying anything, there's too many thuggish people out there and two wrongs don't make a "right" no way over a parking space is it justified, using deadly force, if you're carrying a weapon you have to think of that before you even initiate a contact where it can go, you don't want to get put in a position where you have to draw- down let alone fire on somebody if you have a C.C.W
@Kathy J it's not worth getting into it with somebody and having it escalate to a point where you need to use deadly force over a parking space? That's not your civic duty, it's not worth it in this day and age, with all the violent people around to even say anything to a stranger, if you're not in some official capacity, where you can actually write a citation.
@Frank Paya I honestly didn't realize when I wrote my comment cuz I used talk to text that it sounds weird but also I really don't think it has anything to do with race I just think two people were in the wrong no he shouldn't have pushed him like that that literally should have never happened but it wasn't something someone should lose their life over it that's it I think that nobody has the right to take somebody else's life away you don't get to make that decision and I really truly believe that if you have a gun you need to take hours and hours of safety and not walk around acting like you're big and bad because you have a gun
@gour Ranga well he pulled his gun and dude backed away so I think that was enough there he could have then got in his car and left but he shot a man who was backing up and no longer a deathly threat
@gour Ranga HE PUSHED HIM? that is NOT cause for use of deadly force? u wouldn’t last a day on my streets if you started drawing your weapon everytime someone got pushed.
@gour Ranga I do understand where ur coming from, as i grew up inna violent ass area everyone knew if u hit somebody u bound to get blasted n its smth u expect, but the way this man rly thought the murder was justified by law was kinda funny to me
Wow, one minute it's another day at the gas station and the next you're gone. All the father knew was that his wife was in trouble. I can only imagine what the father thought in that moment. If this scumbag didn't have a gun he wouldn't of even thought about getting involved. Hurts my heart that this really happened to a family
"All the father knew was that his wife was in trouble." Actually no she wasn't. The guy escalated it immediately to a fight and got himself killed. That was the exact WRONG move for him to make.
It is very sad for the family. But this is a case of TWO men both doing the wrong thing. The boyfriend shoving a man to the ground was committing battery. That was completely unnecessary. The man firing a gun back committed murder out of anger. Both men committed violent crimes to different degrees. Clearly, shooting is far worse than shoving. Neither one of these men was an innocent victim. If the boyfriend had just come out and confronted the guy verbally and asked him what the hell he was doing, there is a good chance he would have gone home that evening with his family. However, I suspect Mr Drejka would eventually have ended up in jail or dead from some other incident.
@Don Cross to be fair we have no idea what the man was saying to his wife. I mean just looking at his hand gestures he definitely wasn't being calm. And the husband didnt have any context besides seeing that he was literally in his girls face. If it were me I wouldnt have waited for him to get any closer. I 100% would have tried to get between him and my girl or move him away from her. Maybe not exactly to the extent of shoving him to the ground, but pushing him back a bit or grabbing his shoulders and moving him away while asking him what the fuck he was doing in my girls face.
@sexysolaire you are ridiculous. This whole situation should have never happened.
We can play the what if game all day but we both know the boyfriend should not have pushed mr. threat neutralised, and mr. threat neutralised should not have shot a man backing away.
You can’t justify pushing a person because the other guy committed murder. Both offences are criminal, one definitely has more permanent consequences than the other
@sexysolaire no one is showing sympathy to the murderer. They’re just saying that the father shoving him and escalating the situation was a very bad move and ended with him dying. The father, obviously, did not deserve to die for this, but he still should not have escalated the situation.
@çelikhan savaş You need to seek help. No one in their right mind would assert death is called for in a minor crime. The point is that the Dunn and Drejka cases are aberrations. In ALMOST ALL cases, if you stand up to ‘folks’ from the ‘hood, that are committing minor crimes like blasting music, etc, then it will be YOU who are attacked (and perhaps even die).
In the Dunn & Drejka cases, it is the boys from the ‘hood who were the ones attacked. NOW—>That’s a RARE situation
@Connection Lost he didn’t deserve to get shot tho a gun didn’t even need to be pulled he just pushed him then stood there he didn’t charge him or nothing then when the guns pulled he backs up there that’s it situation done that’s the farthest it should have gotten gun pulled dude backs up u get up and leave and no one’s hurt or dead but no u not only pull ur gun on a man who just pushed u and stood there u proceed to shoot him once he backs up a couple steps craziness
@sexysolaire he attacked a man he didn't know and you don't do that as you don't know what that man is capable of, is he a schizophrenic, mad, is he carrying? His mistake was that if you knock a man down you make sure he stays down, not turn your back to him, neutralize him. If he'd been army he would have known that. His own fault and his family has to live with it.
No one should get their hands put on them for words or screaming. Obviously we will in a world where people have to defend they hurt feelings, but if that guy never out his hands on Bro he wouldn’t of died. And no he didn’t deserve to die, and the shooter was wrong, but again would of never happened if the guy never out his hands on him in the first place.
@GreenMeanNumber4 Official sucks dude died, but don't act like he didn't have any other choice or was even remotely justified in pushing this dude. Same shit happens here in Baltimore. High school dropouts think words give you the right to physically attack people. It's sad.
The guy was just waiting for the right confrontation to "showcase" his self defense training. May be if he had remained silent and talked to a lawyer instead, he could have gotten out easily.
Having representation would have made the prosecutors job more difficult, but the video is damning. Not only that, he has a history of starting shit with people.
I am not sure if it’s damming. There is no audio, he could have claimed to have warned the person killed and he still kept making threats and getting closer. The video also shows him coming up unexpectedly when he was taking to wife and pushing him so he can argue he was startled and scare (which he probably was to an extent) so it partially would support him.
And it would depend on what he did in the past, but I think a lawyer could still work this to a mild sentence. It’s this questioning here and his responses that are damming.
Ok, I’m not in or from America, but why oh why do these people talk to the cops in these interrogations?…Especially in The USA? Do these suspects think these cops are psychologists, “someone” to open up to? Never ever ever ever talk to the Police, innocent or guilty!….Lawyer up immediately! After listening to legal advice and you know that you’re innocent, then maybe talk a bit with a lawyer present. If you’re guilty, never utter a word, and have a lawyer present for any possible discussion and point to him when the detectives question you!
However, having said that, I watch these videos because I do like to see the guilty get outwitted! It’s entertaining and fascinating at the same time! Like reading a murder mystery book or something!
Also just one other point, an afterthought I guess. I really hope when a cop shoot’s someone, they likewise get a similar interrogation experience. I want to believe it is always this way for officers being interrogated, but I’d settle for maybe 50% of the time, hopefully more! I’m not anti-police or anything, I have some in my family who are good men. Peace!✌️
It's frustrating that after Dreka was made aware of the footage, and it was probably shown to everyone (including himself) in court, that he still stuck to his story.
He could have just admitted to what he did and told the truth. "I panicked, I made a mistake and killed a man when I didn't have to"
Yes, I was wondering all the way through why he didn't say this. "I honestly thought he was coming for me and I feared for my life. Having seen the footage I can see that in the heat of the moment I was mistaken. I feel terrible but I honestly thought I had not choice in that moment." Perfectly plausible, if not entirely convincing.
@QuincelSC there's no way to reasonably believe he feared for his own life and was justified. The dude was literally backing up as much as he can. Admitting and presenting it in the way you did probably would have resulted in a reduced sentence and honestly from a media point of view it would have benefited him but tbh I think he's a racist and does not have any remorse for the victim.
The way he goes “aaah left hand” and also struggled to use that arm to shake the detectives hand, then flails it around in the air talking. And continues to act normally when not thinking about having to be in pain.
Also, never once did he seem remorseful for what he had done. Only said “thank you for telling me that.” When they told him he died. Nothing in his voice. He only had remorse for himself.
Why doesnt anyone ever remain silent? Thats a right we have and we should always use it. There is nothing a suspect can gain by talking to police. Even innocent people can only stand to lose by speaking with the law.
I think it has something to do with the age old idea that "only guilty people need legal counsel" and said guilty people (and sometimes innocent people) feel that they need to do whatever necessary to appear innocent even if it is to their detriment. They are in the flight or fight response so aren't thinking critically.
The lesson here, unless a person is attempting to assault you or someone with you, keep your hands to yourself. You just don't know how it's going to turn out. The shooter should have minded his own business. He obviously has a lose connection in the head. Hopefully he goes to jail for a very long time. It's a sad crazy world we are in. Because of it I carry for protection. I do my best to avoid people and confrontation. I go out of my way to do so. I mind my business and all I ask is don't mess with me.
@Gabe Shaw dude it doesn’t matter if I’m scared, this isn’t about me. It’s about this guy killing this man for no reason other than his own. He is in the wrong. Anyone willing to take a life with no remorse doesn’t deserve the life they have.
@Ghu Super yes because pulling your pants up and putting your hands on your waist is "setting your stance to fight" okay.
2 likes
Johnny Parker2022-03-02 03:24:12 (edited 2022-03-02 03:25:20 )
Should people illegally park? No.
Do people have the right to confront strangers while not being violent? Yes.
Do people have their rights to push/assault strangers? No.
Does someone have the right to shoot someone who is backing away? No.
Could either of them deescalated the situation? Could the lady have moved her car instead of going round and round? Could the victim have tried to figure out what’s going on? Should the defendant have verbally warned the victim to get back or he will shoot?
There is plenty of comparative fault in this situation. Why don’t we look at the faults of both parties rather than jump to baseless emotionalism?
Initially the victim and his wife were firstly in the wrong for parking where they did, the victim then was in the wrong for assaulting - up until that right the defendant himself did nothing wrong. I don’t even see where the defendant ever knew the woman even had a boyfriend, so it wasn’t pre Meditated.
I’ve been assaulted before and it makes your adrenaline go crazy. It’s easy to over react in that situation. Odds are he may have not even seen him taking a step back or it may have not registered. Nonetheless a life was lost and it was clear the victim was backing away so the defendant was guilty of something.
I believe in the jury system and justice was served but this isn’t a black and white situation and there are a lot of nuances. I can appreciate a system that allows 12 individuals to weigh a situation out and come to a determination of guilt or innocence.
Drejka strikes me as a real mall ninja. Wants to appear like he’s prior military or LEO by his haircut, presentation and use of jargon. He clearly felt as though he was some kind of Paul Blart “protector” of that establishment.
That’s usually pretty harmless, but when said individual is also a total coward, having a gun is a recipe for disaster. He initiated the confrontation out of a need for power, and when he was met with the slightest amount of force, he justified killing a man (in his mind).
An honest tragedy, brought on by a dork on a power trip. He’s earned every minute of his time behind bars.
I love how there's no commentary whatsoever over the Prosecution. Nothing extra needs to be added, the prosecution said absolutely everything that needed to be said.
Obviously it's good that this guy was found out and imprisoned, but does anyone know how it likely it is he would have gotten away with it had he not said a word and instead requested to speak to a lawyer?
He literally went into this knowing it was going to get physical. He 100% wouldn't even have confronted the mother if he didn't have a gun in his possession.
The shove to the ground gave him the opportunity that he had been awaiting for 25 to 26 years. That shot wasn't out of fear for his life; it was out of retaliation for being shoved to the ground. I can absolutely understand him drawing his weapon but he FAILED to completely assess the situation; His emotions along with the fact that he was a coward took over...
Clear threat, what a joke these defence lawyers are. He's pointed his gun 4 times at other motorists, God help you if you accidentally pull out on him, u get shot and killed. He definitely should not have a gun permit, no way. He's also a liar
I’m coloring on my iPad as I’m watching/listening to this video and the suspect’s story of what happened isn’t making sense to me; like, he’s coming off as if he’s trying to make himself sound like the “hero” in the shooting. What I love about the surveillance video, is that it tells a completely DIFFERENT story than what the suspect says what happened.
to me this case has some kind of racial bias in that the shooter may have believed the altercation could have been dangers on the victim's part because of the false stereotype that african americans are predisposed to violence (which couldn't be more idiotic). i also think that the victim and his wife may have thought the shooter was trying to break into the car and impose danger upon the mother and her children, and this assumption could have led to the initiation of the confrontation. i believe this case is associated with a misunderstanding beteeen an innocent family and a man with a superiority complex, which unfortunately led to the death of an innocent man.
not that anyone asked for my point of view.... lol
This is a perfect example of why it should be mandatory to receive proper training if you're gonna have a permit to carry. 99% of people with a gun don't even know how TF to take it apart or even properly use the dam thing. Need to actually train with the fuckin thing multiple times a week to even have a chance of it making a difference if you DID need it! Oh, and it was definitely fueled by race... if it was a hot white chick, he would've walked up to the car for a whole different reason.
The problem from the start is that this guy decided that he was an enforcer. He believed he not only had a duty, but a privilege, but correct and scold anyone in public for doing anything he believes to be illegal. In reality, of course people without disabled tags shouldn't park in handicap, it's a jerk move, but it isn't up to anyone but the owners/employee's and police, to do a thing about it, and that "thing", is simply to call a tow truck or give them a fine. It isn't to confront them. White dudes really need to stop believing they are in charge of society and get to reprimand everyone.
Had the incident occured exactly as he described and indicated when he sat on the floor. At the one moment when, upon adding both hands to hold the gun, ha motioned as though losing balance and leaning backwards. An argument could have been made that amidst disorientation, you could confuse distance and even falsely believe for a moment that movement occured when it didn't, particularly motions towards and away.
Buuuuuut the CCTV completely disproves that such a motion occured, so doesn't matter.
Having a firearm permit can make anyone BRAVE, BOLD AND DANGEROUS. Their hands would start to get itchy to USE THAT THING and they're gonna come up with different ways to make that happen. THEY'RE GONNA CREATE SUCH SITUATIONS AND USE IT AND THEN TRY TO PLAY THE " DEFENDING " PART.
The amount of violence a person uses is generally in relation to how much violence they think they can get away with. Except when it comes to their immediate family, then all bets are off.
@Gabe Shaw There is one great truth and that is when a person commits a violent act they always believe they used far less force than the person on the receiving end perceives it be. This then leads that person to strike back with much a harder force than the one they experienced and so on as the violence grows greater and greater.
The original violence began with the verbally abusive acts by the convicted killer.
Lmao his lawyer complaining about the quality of the footage although you can clearly see everything they used against him regardless of the "wavy lines" he said he saw
Wait this is now the second tree trimmer guy on JCS?! (Christmas with Cliff). And there’s seems to be a lot of commonality between the two. Both wanna be bad assess, seem insecure.
M J2021-12-27 19:48:33 (edited 2021-12-27 19:48:56 )
Micheal: Yeah, and then I like, totally shot him (smirks), kind of a badass moment if I do say so myself (chuckles and crosses his arms matter of factly) Cop: Sir, you’re being sentenced to 20 years
guys have you realized the guilty have a lot of thirst compared to the innocent. so far most of the videos I have watched all the guys keep drinking as if its hot in there
If he wanted to be traffic warden and police handicap spots, why didn't he do it for a living. A right old busybody who thinks he can take law in to his own hands. But to shoot someone for pushing you, overkill or what
16:29 Officer: Was the car running? Drejka: "I couldn't tell. It's so quiet. These damn cars." Damn cars? What, he's angry that some cars are too quiet? Huh?????
He got pushed after arguing about a disabled space being used by a non disabled person, it obviously boils his piss...he then took a life because the boyfriend was going to kick his ass. People get angry quick and carrying a gun, well, this shit is going to happen on a regular basis.
Very sad indeed.drayke did not show any sypethy or a care in the world about what he's just done. He never has any remorse at all ever .he had NO Right to shoot some one.at point blank range.. he got an appropriate sentence for his crime. He started.and could of prevented it any Time. Justice is served in the end
No gun on his hip and he wouldn’t have said a word to the lady in the handicap spot. He initiated and ended the altercation in less than 30 seconds…he’s been chomping at the bit to use that gun!
How does this person not say in his final interview that he wishes the guy he shot might have lived? It doesn't admit any ground in terms of a self defense case but could only make him look better. Truly horrifying that he actually is living that life right now. Complete denial and inability to express any remorse.
If this was in England that guy would have got up off the floor and got back in his car.When people argue they need guns to defend themselves against bad guys, this is what they mean. Thank god for the cameras or he’d be free.
This guy had been having this wet dream for years and finally got to act it out. What a pos. Although watching him tie himself up in knots because he thought he was justified was satisfying to watch. If he had shut up and got a lawyer he would have walked
the cop is listing out all the possibilities of threatening positions or movements that the victim could have portrayed after stating that in fact he did not walk towards him but did the exact opposite. the suspect denies all of them. didn't see his hands, didn't see his facial expressions, no words were exchanged, didn't see a weapon, basically saying he wasn't theatened.... then says "i know he was a black guy, that's all"
30 years? 30 years?! THAT is the maximum sentence? He can come out of prison still alive. Why does he deserve life when he took the life of an innocent defenseless man?
@Primacia He committed the crime of battery. Which is a felony. And you characterize the deceased as a purely innocent man?
And a defenseless man? The shooter was completely blindsided by a 20 year younger and much taller and stronger man. If this guy had not committed a murder he would be by far the more sympathetic figure here.
I really hated the defence attorney, not because he was defending an 'almost' racist killer, but because of how patronising it was to listen to the lawyer
Actually I'd indct for murder. Mike initiated the situation that he claimed dangerous enough to kill for. Marquis pushed him because he insulted girl. He turned in defense. Murder.
Kevin Porter2021-12-22 22:53:29 (edited 2021-12-22 23:35:59 )
The US is insane to let urban civilians own guns. In the wilds I suppose there is a small reason to do so for protection and hunting. But to be allowed to carry a gun when shopping is crazy. The number of deaths by firearms in the US is astronomical compared to any other modern democracy. A shameful statistic for a country so boastful of its freedoms.
That wasn't manslaughter, it was murder. A family is without a husband, father, brother, son because a racist would-be gunslinger carries a weapon with him when he goes to buy groceries.
Even if i waa handicaped i wouldn't even confront some one parked illegaly on handicaped space , ill just park the closest and make surw they see me struggling to get out and go in the store I will exagerate so the can see me and hopefully they wont do it again
The fact that he thought that the cops knew what "force multiplier" meant, shows how deluded he is into thinking he's "one of them" (and also the terms he uses: negative, neutralize threat, etc)
These videos are always proof that you can't underestimate how fast racists will come into these comments to pathetically attempt to justify a black man's death lmao
@Gabe Shaw Comment section tough guy and a know it all- chance of death from a kneecap shot, maybe 3/10 at most- doesn't surprise me that you need a gun to protect yourself lol
@Gabe Shaw Your grasp of grammar, spelling, and common sense are all tenuous at best- all of those are pretty good indicators of general intelligence- which I think you're most likely lacking
@Gabe Shaw Shooting someone in the upper body is far more dangerous than the lower body- you disagree with that- I think you're wrong, you think I'm wrong- I'm good leaving it right there
The black man had no respect for the parking, secondly the female shouldn't of opened her mouth and third of all the black man's intention was to get violent. So, it is do or die. Why don't they respect the parking space for people that really needs it. What a shame. Thank you Sir for speaking out for the handicap parking 👊
it's tragic that a life was lost because of something as trivial as parking in a handicapped spot. This guy was clearly just looking for an excuse to shoot somebody that day
This all could've been avoided if the dude didn't feel the need to approach them in the first place. He just wanted to be a jackass to somebody to feel entitled and ended up being a murderer.
42:32 defence was reeealy goin in on video quality like its not pretty good for an outdoor stripmall camera "not completely representative" fuck outa here
@Gabe Shaw Surely you’re not inferring that the fine young colourful gentleman who violently assaulted Mr. Drejka is responsible for his own actions and the controller of his own fate, are you? Because that kind of wrongthink can get you into a lot of trouble around here, mister! 😉
A lesson here is that escalating a situation involving words by getting physical opens up a huge realm of possibility. You never know how insane the other guy is.
So Firearms to erveryone makes your life safer??? Sry America I just don´t get it. There is just no Szenario, that anybody dies in this situation, without a gun in this public space. sry for my english^^
Yes! That's so true. I like that. I'm a dog trainer - I work with rescuing and rehabilitating dogs. On a regular basis, I am hired for dogs that people think are aggressive, mean, dominant, etc. But the most aggressive & dangerous dogs (applies for all animals) are the ones that are fearing for their well-being. Extremely nervous drivers are the most dangerous drivers. That applies to everything!
@Marina Keller even if it was the owner of the store, self defense is defined as killing someone because you BELIEVE that your life or someone else’s life is in danger.
@Terry Fulds Gaming The guy pushed him to the ground and stood back after he was arassing his wife and wouldn't live, he in response shot and killed him.
After watching a buch of these videos , I'm starting to get scared of visiting america ,It's like everyone has a gun and tries to find any reason to shoot it, I mean, I might just get shot for looking at someone funny ,like imagine this situation happening in europe or some other place Best case scenario : black guy pushes white guy ,he gets a little bruise , his ego gets hurt a little bit and NOBODY DIES Worst case scenario : black guy starts beating up the white guy in the ground but since they are in a middle of a gas station somebody would probably tried to diffuse the situation and then again, NOBODY DIES
@Shh my pup is sleepin he was looking for trouble, he found it. At the end of video, they said that he did it before, only this time 3 kids lost their dad.
@Terry Fulds Gaming terry it’s in your best interest to learn what self defense actually is. In a public setting proving self defense is much harder than when you’re protecting your home. even in states with castle doctrine you aren’t allowed to shoot someone just because they’re an intruder in your home. Someone has to believe their life is in actual danger to be cleared of a shooting. This isn’t my opinion these are facts. For your sake and the sake of gun owners stop justifying obvious bad shoots, it’s not a good look on the 2a community.
I can't tell if you're joking or not, but if not, then this is prob why he's scared of visiting, other countries think America is full of racists. Hard to convince them otherwise at this point. @OG Bob Bob
@Jack Tilghman yes, of course , but just the fact that anyone can get a gun is scary ,it gives too much power to the average guy , like uncle ben once said with great power comes great responsibility but a lot of people don't have the responsibility , I mean ,even I could shoot someone if I had a gun, in a bad day , in the heat of the moment ,or even just for morbid curiosity , people do stupid shit
The combination of people getting upset over the smallest things, and people having easy access to guns is really scary. The amount of stories like this I've read online, e.g. people getting shot for telling someone to please wear a mask... Glad I don't live in the US
@David Cisneros even then I can’t get behind cops killing people for handicap spots either wtf lmao I mean yeah it’s rude and inconsiderate but murder is a whole ass other ballgame
@Wize Wolf Whether you believe Michaels story about thinking his life was in danger or not, that doesn't take away the fact that the victim pushed him to the ground. From the footage it did look like the victim was going to give him a beating, but thats just speculation of course, but people do die from getting struck/kicked to the head, so its possible to believe he was scared for his life. The biggest problem with this case, and why Michael deserved his prison sentence i feel is that he didn't even consider the fact of just brandishing his firearm, it looked like his intension was to shoot right away. From the footage we can see the victim is retreating backwards when the firearm was brandished, and the situation should have ended there. I don't personally believe the guy was aiming to kill that person, he shot once and holstered his weapon to wait for police etc. Still though, in this circumstance it was very pre-emptive when you look how he was retreating, and michael lying about the fact and saying he was coming towards him after brandishing.
The fact that it took paramedics 19 minutes to get there is also insane, i suspect that perhaps it took a while before they where called to the scene, cause that response time was really out of this world. With the 1 gsw and a quick response the victims chances would be much better i think, but you never know.
After watching the video it feels like Michael purposefully wanted to shoot the guy once to dominate the situation, probably some revenge in there as well for pushing him to the ground. There are alot of things that could have been done differently to not instigate a fight or even worse the murder. The victim could obviously have had a verbal confrontation back like Michael was doing, and Michael could obviously have stopped and controlled the situation after just brandishing his firearm, there was no need for him to shoot.
@ciaoneef Where do you live? In the US, these incidents are pretty rare, and aren't a concern to the average person. That being said, my part of the country is very safe.
@ARCHITACADEMY I live in The Netherlands, basically only organized crime people have guns here. (Ironically an investigative journalist was actually just shot in broad daylight 2 days ago, but that's super rare.) If I lived in a concealed carry state in the US I'd be scared to get into arguments with people, might just get shwacked for pissing off the wrong old white guy
@Joel McKnight If the intent is murder then I agree but firing ONE well-placed bullet at center mass is solely meant to stop/neutralize further forward progress and likely bodily harm. Had Drejka wanted to kill McGlockton he would've emptied the clip. He demonstrated tremendous control and restraint despite being dazed from the violent push to the ground.
@Seek Wisdom Funny thing is, that's how it works everywhere else in the world. And yet, you guys in the US are the ones with the most police violence. So how is it helping exactly that everyone is allowed to carry a gun? Oh right, police are more paranoid, hence why they are more trigger happy than everywhere else.
@Wize Wolf You're misrepresenting my reply. I'm not justifying what he did, and i already said he deserved to go to prison for a long time because of what he did. I was merely presenting the facts of the video as i saw them. Which is there was more than 1 person who could have changed the outcome of the situation. From my perspective the victim was never in the wrong here, even when i dont agree with his first action being physical, i never said it was wrong either.
The focus of this video is to analyze the situation, not jump to emotional conclusions. This is only speculation of course, if push came to shove i would probably have pushed the guy as well. Hopefully not as a first response, i would hope that i'd have the capacity to try and de-escalate the situation verbally first. If that wouldn't work i'd have to either get physical or enter the car and drive away.
The only point i was trying to get across is we should very rarely turn to violence as a first response.
@Ainsley Oliver while that may be true, i’m failing to see where anyone has the right to take another human beings life over a parking spot. smfh if he cared about doing the right thing he would have taken pictures and reported it, he’s a man on a power trip looking to defend “his” store. pathetic that people are even defending that where is the humanity.
@Ainsley Oliver 😂 your kidding right? If he minded his own business then this wouldn't have happened he started and he is a wimp with a gun that just murdered someone because they shoved I'm on his arse for talking to their missus the way he was. He deserves to rot in jail forever. You justify his actions because he was "making sure someone wasn't taking advantage of our disabled parks" 😂😂🤦 you can't be that dull. Maybe live your life instead of thinking your above the law.
@el colito for sure if compared to several areas 19 minutes is fast. when it comes to people that are critically wounded though 19 minutes might be too long. I believe in the U.S they aim for a 5-7 minute response time for the ambulance to get there, and a 20 second response time on the call itself. When it comes to critical situations like these, it gets very difficult to save them if they are not treated by professionals immediately.
If he had just done nothing, or even just drawn his weapon but not fired, he could have sued the guy and lived happily ever after. But he wanted to shoot somebody, so that’s what he did.
I don't see it as he could have sued as to my mind he left this victim to feel the need to protect his family and create a safe space away from his family in that car. This wasn't even a reason for him to take it upon himself to play parking cop. The employee of the store could have been the one to deal with that if need be. It's just a ridiculous reason to confront anyone over this, at least up until they see a person needing that space and unable to do so. Senseless.. So many lives forever changed over stupid self inflated ego trips.
It's against the law in FL to pull a gun out or fire a warning shot to "scare" your attacker off. If you pull it out you better be in real danger and ready to pull the trigger.
@Cleborp IMO defending private property isn't justification to kill someone, you can get your TV back but that person can never get their life back. Likewise getting pushed to the ground isn't good enough reason to shoot someone. It really wasn't like his life was in danger here over a small altercation, he had no reason to fire.
@Cogs of Cogitation some laws you can kill if they are robbing. He still got assaulted, I think a scared 50 year old who didn’t mean to go for the kill shot didn’t deserve 20 years . Yes still killed even though the guy was backing away but still
@Cleborp You're high dude. The guy had used his gun multiple times as a leverage in heated arguments. The guy was fucking power tripping. A guy like that is not safe to have out on the streets at all. He shot to kill, not shot to defend.
17 likes
Jared Price2021-08-22 12:26:24 (edited 2021-08-22 15:10:36 )
@Cleborp I think the whole problem is that he actually wanted to go for the kill shot. He opened carried for years, probably just waiting for the golden opportunity. But the biggest point of all was that he initiated the whole altercation. You don’t go harassing a woman out in public and not expect her husband to defend her. I’d understand better if they were the ones harassing him, but still, even then it’s not justified. No one in their right mind would feel like their life is in serious danger at that point. They’re in public and the man is visibly unarmed.
@Jared Price disagree with some of your points. Ya he approached but at a safe distance and technically they shouldn’t have parked there, then he gets assaulted . Again the question is if he wanted the kill shot or not
@Cleborp Stand your ground laws are highly contentious and limited to certain states. Once more being scared doesn't make it suddenly okay to shoot an unarmed person, the level of violence he used was far greater than what was necessary. He didn't even give a warning shot first, he went straight for the center of mass, with a full 2 seconds to evualate things. The guy wanted to take out his anger, not to defend himself.
@Crystal Nobles That's fair, but would you shoot the person if they started to leave the house? Would you fire a warning shot? If you were alone would you try to leave the house before resorting to a possible kill scenario? Ultimately this isn't really about stand your ground laws anyways, it's just about at what point is it okay to kill someone? In this video's scenario, assault shouldn't be a basis for killing.
@Cogs of Cogitation so you’re 50 year old grandpa gets shoved to the ground would you think it’s ok if he shot to defend himself he was probably scared and dazed . Adrenaline pumping
Hey everyone don’t trip. @cleborp is the type to start a fight, get beat up and call the cops. Or start a fight in hopes too use his firearm. He is set in his logic. For now
@Cleborp if my 50 year old grandpa was being a jackass, aggressively harassing (it stated at the start of the video that there was a loud argument) a lone woman (as far as he knew at that point) for parking in a disabled spot without a permit, when there are clearly other places to park too, then yeah I wouldn't be surprised if her husband stepped up on him!
He also didn't engage in an argument with the male, he drew the power he'd bought himself on his hip, and fired without warning or clarifying the situation. He instigated the confrontation knowing he had a trump card on his hip. A man lost his life, a woman her husband and kids their dad because someone was a bit upset that a disabled parking spot was taken and a male Karen with a side arm took the law into his own hands. Ridiculous.
He could have reported the unauthorized parking to staff inside, or called the authorities himself. Instead he took responsibility because he knew he could end an altercation immediately and behaved irresponsibly. I'm writing this 32 mins in. It'd be interesting to know if he knew what the outcome would be at the end, when he first started his beef regarding the lack of a placard, whether he would still have started that argument. I'm going to assume he would and still be proud of it
@Cleborp you’re the one that said he ( the shooter) could have had adrenaline pumping. Justifying it. But I’m in no mood to go back and forth with stupid. Have a good one
@Cleborp he was harassing them well before he got pushed down. it was a push as well and the man had no weapon, yet he shot the man dead in front of his wife and kid. how the hell are you gonna say that’s justified? it’s not self defense if you threatened them first.
@Cleborp What's confusing you here. I responding to your comment. You wrote "People steal houses blah blah blah." I'm asking what you're talking about? How would anyone steal a house?
@Cleborp He’s not my grandfather and my grandfather is not stupid enough to threaten a 20-30 some year old man’s family for a property he doesn’t own. If he gets pushed, I’ll feel sorry for him, but he got what was coming. Which was literally just a push.
@VixenTheFox What bold words you have to say about Americans, I wonder what nation you are from but however let's give you a history lesson, before we proceed answer the simple question why does the US have the second amendment?
13 likes
Michael Grossman2020-10-08 08:41:51 (edited 2020-10-08 08:42:54 )
Vixenthefox The vast majority of people that get killed by guns here is by illegal gun owners. Nobody here is like this guy. And when a government tries to take your freedom away, our weapons is how we provent it. Western world? Lol almost every modern western society has some sort of gun laws allowing ownership legally except south america and man thats where illegal guns and murder rule. So what are you talking about?
I'm 110% for the 2nd amendment, I have 7 guns and working on getting another.. But people like this is what makes me worry about armed citizens going out like what happened in Kenosha (not here to argue whether or not it was justified.) My point is there are a lot of unstable people out there that have guns and that may not be an issue if they're just hunters but once they start putting on ballistic vests and patrolling like they're in Iraq, some bad shit is bound to ensue. I'm afraid we'll start seeing a lot more shootings related to armed citizens walking around if something doesn't change in our country on both sides of the problem.
@Keith Then that'd definitely land you assault and battery charges. If beating is involved then it's likely to go into the aggravated assault category.
woman complimenting strangers is sweet and wholesome, but men complementing strangers is pervy and simping. I'm not even disagreeing, I just find it odd. we truly do live in a society. lol
@The Man With No Name I completely agree. Society gives free passes to women where a man would not get one. But I wouldnt compare this situation to that.
@Lisa W this is exactly that. When you thought he was a woman, you thought it was sweet and wholesome. But when you realize it was a man, suddenly everyone started attacking him. Like I said before, I feel the same way, men complimenting strangers online (especially women) is creepy and weird. But nothing changed with his statements, they're the same posts as before, but now that you know they're from a man, it's simp shit. lol
@The Man With No Name It was sweet and wholesome whether it came from a man or woman. But I backed off after he put his instagram up there. A compliment is absolutely fine and I appreciated it, but trying to take it outside of youtube is where I backed out, that applies to females as well.
@The Man With No Name well it’s not really odd if you think about it...most of the time when men do that it does come off as creepy with weird intentions however it can come from both men and women
A push from a grown man on pavement can easily end up with someone dead. This isn't kids on a playground, two adult men putting hands on each other can get deadly real quick. That's why you don't want to get into situations like this. Bad decisions all around.
Why is nobody mentioning the fact that the victim parked in a handicap spot? Listen, I'm not justifying him being shot but I hate arrogant people who just think they can do anything they want - with an "IDGAF" attitude, such as parking in a disabled parking spot when they're not disabled. These types of people are scumbags. He did not deserve to be shot over this but unfortunately, he crossed somebody who was a little more arrogant than him that day and paid the consequences. Sorry but both the suspect and the victim can kiss my *
@The Man With No Name The problem, how did they assume it was a man, in the first place? was it via his actions which associated with how men like “them” act, since the commenter is ambiguous.
Because he's incompetent. There are a dozen times during that prosecutor's monologue on "Beyond a reasonable doubt" that any reasonable lawyer would have objected to. That man was misrepresenting a fundamental piece of our legal system and nobody called him on it.
The Evidence and Drejka's own testimony make a brutal case against him on their own, especially on the relatively low bar that is the charge of manslaughter. The only hope Drejka had was to desperately pull on the jurors heartstrings, so that's what defense did.
All the 'affirmative' and 'negative, sir' he said was so cringe knowing he doesn't even come from that background. He's probably one of those dudes who wears tacticool gear to go target shooting in the woods.
Don't assault people. Also don't agree with confrontation when not necessary. Pointless. Call the cops if you're concerned. An unjustified shooting though. Could've drawn and ordered him back but it's easy to play back seat quarterback. Get trained if you're going to carry, have Legal Shield and don't say a word until your attorney is present. Your bias is showing.
Dead giveaway when he says "i was trying to neutralize" - not only is he adopting police jargon to seem at kin with the cops, this statement in itself obviates the fact that he did not see the level of force necessary to avoid serious harm as equivalent to the use of a deadly force.. he has dug his own grave with that statement.
Don't like the prosecutors example, thunder smell of rain and lightning, then you wake up to water everywhere means rain. If I wake up and there is water everywhere, I'm going to immediately assume that a water pipe broke in my house, since I don't sleep outside. Fire pit out by helicopter with bucket meaning no sun tomorrow? Depends on how bad the fire is and the forecast for the weather. Awful examples. Doesn't mean I think defendant is innocent, just the prosecutor didn't drive his examples the way he thinks he did.
I personally think that he delusion himself into thinking that it was a self-defense. At that moment, the victim was probably the first one to actually "engage" a fight while he's carrying a gun. When he was pushed and felt threatened he probably have the thought "oh I was pushed and if I don't do something he will try more than that". He pulled his gun out and the victim move away, he registered that hence he hesitated but his reasoning made him think of "Its fine to shoot him now because it's self-defense" and that is most likely because he had fantasize or dream of the moment where he can finally use his gun. As it was said that he did like waving his gun around. He was consumed by his delusion that he fired the gun thinking that he can escape the consequences as he believed of it as self-defense.. But then again, it was just my opinion.
I think this kinda makes sense if you consider two things: First, It’s hard to find good ccw self defense shooting statistics, BUT I’ve heard that an average number of rounds fired is between 5-6 in an citizen shooting. Second, he fired only once.
When he thought about it he fired his first shot because like you said he thought he could blow some poor guy who was mad about his lady getting harassed then realized he probably shouldn’t have shot him and didn’t fire a second shot. A big thing for ccw consideration is how many rounds were fired and how “necessary” rounds were fired to essentially save you from whatever threat. Say an individual runs away or drives away after trying to car jack you and you keep shooting as they drive down the street the police are gonna be pretty upset about that. Knowing this, he probably shouldn’t have shot that man and that he wasn’t in any real danger he only fired once and instantly regretted it instead of trying to fire off more rounds.
Here's a bright idea: What if he just walked away. When the wife asked him why it was his business, walk away. When she got out of the car, walk away. When someone pushed him but backed up as soon as he pulled out the gun, walk away. This wasn't an inevitable situation and he was the instigator.
@Niebo even if, hypothetically, it was a justified self defense shooting, he is far from a hero. Even if it is a justified self defense shooting, he is a slow in the brain coward for shooting a man FATALLY, who was not a threat after pushing him down.
@Hunter Nichols The coward are the one who pushed him. Pretending to be disabled parked on site for people with disabilities. He got a bullet for being a dodger. A dozen years ago they would have considered it self-defense but now the law is strong for the weak and weak for the strong.
I mean the cops already had to be called on him in 4 separate road rage incidents in 10 years, 3 allegedly involving the guns he claimed to always carry with him since he was 22. Also: “Two involved allegations of Drejka showing a gun. In another, a trooper accused him of aggressive driving and cited him after a crash when Drejka braked hard in front of a woman driving with two children.”
His actions weren't justified but if you ever draw a weapon you train to shoot center mass, which is why you should NEVER draw unless you intend to kill. Shooting in the leg is movie b.s.
@Adrian Gorus yeah pushing someone over like that... I mean getting shot is not something you should expect but imagine if the guy was an off-duty cop. That's an arrest for assault. The victim was not very bright either. I've seen a person get pushed over like that, hitting their head on the concrete and going to coma (this was at school and it was way less powerful push). I had concussion from similar event, but I was drunk and got pushed for seemingly hitting on someone else's girl. My sister had her collarbone broken from being pushed like that. Like serious injuries can happen from being pushed over... yet he went out and with no context yeets the guy. I am niot justifying Drejka, just saying that both sides over-reacted to the situation.
@Adrian Gorus So, he should have just let the dude harass his girlfriend and kids while taking pictures of their car? He was clearly the instigator. Can't really avoid being shot by him when he's the one pointlessly starting it, expecting you to just stand there and take it.
@Soleilune he couldve stepped in like a normal human being and not start assaulting people🙃 as civilized people we should talk and not shove/hit... and tbh i didnt see him taking pictures either
@Soleilune how about you listen to it... he says that is what he usually does with people who park on a reserved parking spot... look at the surveillance it literally shows how he walks around and then proceeds to argue when he gets hit
@No Name im not saying that he doesn’t deserve it because he definitely does but the guy that got shot was about as stupid as he was... imo both were at fault big time and the one who did it got rightously punished
@TheVanBourner thats what i meaan. Im Not glorifying the shooter but jesus christ why provocate a fight by instantly escalating to violence. Its called being civilized about something and that dude surely wasnt
@No Name he got shot for assaulting him... why do you guys magically forget that it was escalated by the guy who got shot... like cmon i know you can think of an better argument
@No Name and btw im not saying the shooter was innocent because he definitely was not in imminent danger ANYMORE but the guy who got shot definitely escalated it to a level of physical violence and he was not a hero protecting his gf and kids like you depict him as.
they manipulated the video. FYI He was justified in his head, as he thought he was coming back, as did i when i first watched the video. It was only when i re watched it, in slow motion, i see what we all see. this is sad, but how our minds work, again, he was not lying, its what he really believes and saw, and in the splits second, so will you in that situation. MAKE AN EXPERIEMNT, WITH A FAKE GUN, AND KEEP GETTING RANDOM PEOPLE WITH A FAKE ATTCKER, AND SEE WHO PULLS TRIGGER, AND WHAT THE VIDEO SHOWS, TO THERE TESTIMONY, BEFORE WATCHING IT. I BET YOU WIL NOT LIKE THE RESULTS. THIS MAN SHOULD GET TIMED SERVED, AND MUCH NEED THEROPY. HE WA VIOLENTLY PUSHED AND ATTCKED TO THE GROUND WITH MANY MORE VERBEL THRATS OF HARM, HE IS THE VICTIM AND STILL IS.
@No Name i literally said twice that i dont justify what the shooter did... but im saying the guy who shoved him was also at fault because no shoving people out of the blue is not justified... violence is not the solution to a verbal argument.
@Adrian Gorus It wasn't out of the blue, bro. The guy was literally yelling at the top of his lungs towards his gf and kids. Like, this is VERY obvious.
@No Name and the guy who got shot is at fault because he escalated it and gave the shooter a possibility or rather an opportunity to use his power where the shooter thinks he is justified to shoot so he does. If the shooter is scared of consequences he wouldnt do it but in his mind he just got assaulted which he did and saw the chance to shoot him so he did
@No Name ??? Idk man you seem kinda obnoxious... the guy came up behind him and shoved him pretty hard without any declaration of intent or something... and also since when can you see sound because idk bout you but i feel like the video does not seem to have audio
4 likes
No Name2021-06-03 22:10:32 (edited 2021-06-03 22:10:47 )
@Adrian Gorus Lol... Dude... It was literally IN the video that he was yelling very loud for over a minute, to the point that it could be heard from the inside of the store... Stop being intentionally ignorant
@No Name Look I understand your point but just because he is the victim doesn't mean what he did was the right thing. Noone should shove anyone into the ground. Adrian is right on that point. I don't know why you get so worked up on a comment that is common sense. The killer def deserves for what he did, but the victim also shouldn't have retaliated in violent manner unless he was being physically threatened which he wasn't.
@Adrian Gorus I would just ingore this No Name dude. It's one of those people that doesn't see things from multiple perspectives. If someone dies, I guess that person to him/her was a pure angel that didn't do anything wrong.
@Douglas Moore Disparity of force. Using lethal force to protect oneself from an attacker that fails to display ability, opportunity, and intent to inflict death or grave bodily injury, is a no no.
@Adrian Gorus I agree this No Name guy does not understanding what you're saying at all. You may as well be speaking to a wall. Everybody in this situation is an idiot. Doesn't mean the guy deserved to die, literally noone said that.
@Bojidar Stanchev I didn't say that shooting is the correct response. I said that pushing someone over like that is also over-reaction and needlessly escalates situation. Simple as that.
he wanted revenge because he got shoved and was unprepared to defend himself otherwise. he didn't have instincts and self defense skills, just the ability to harass. he was overly obnoxious in the first place (actual police officers will start out polite and don't become defensive unless they suspect bodily threat-and yes they might overreact because they are trained to protect themselves and other officers' lives as a priority. they become irate, aggressive as well to intimidate someone who is a possible life threat). he might not have gotten shoved so hard. he thought it commendable he cared she was in that spot without a placard. he ended up doing something far worse. the father and child planned to be in there just a few minutes. if a disabled person needed the space, she would have been able to accommodate them right away.
3 likes
Douglas Moore2021-06-04 13:11:36 (edited 2021-06-04 13:12:23 )
@E its not a no no, if the guy was defending himself. The guy shouldnt of walked up to the car, but he did, the black guy shouldnt of pushed him on the ground, but he did. Drejka wasnt attacking the car or the women inside so there was no reason for the black guy to get physically agressive. Drejka made a split second decision to save his life, in the heat of the moment i think everyone wouldnt done what Drejka did. And Drejka only dischared his weapon once, after the attacker was "neutralized", Drejka had no reason to shoot again. Most people wouldve shot multiple times until the attacker fell to the ground
@virginia exactly, the victim has a family. His wife and children were all in the car and a man just popped out nowhere and suddenly started yelling at them, ofcourse you're instinct is to protect them. I dont get why they keep saying that the shoving was uncalled for, clearly they dont understand what it means to have a family of their own. The other guy should've just punch or matched the victim's intial response but since this other guy has always been assertive on every chance he gets to use his gun, coz this gun violence already happened 4 times prior to this. He also admitted that when approached the vehicle he knows there could probably an altercation but he was prideful coz he had his stupid gun.
@Soleilune there's a significant number of the population that fantasizes about "legally" murdering people. Thrills of the murder, but none of the consequences of it. Whatever it be jail or live as a fugitive, none of that and just remain living a middle-class life. After murdering someone, plus being treated a hero for that.
@Jaja Raguini Physically assaulting someone over a verbal altercation is the definition of uncalled for. You don’t do that shit. Be mature about things and actively seek to de escalate.
@TheVanBourner but Drejka went way across the line yes the altercation should not have gotten to that point but drejka shot someone who was walking away. My grammar sucks so just bear with me.
@Soleilune it doesn’t matter who started it or who the two people were, unless the actions in the past directly correlate to the current case, all that matters is that Drejka shot someone who was walking away and clearly was not reaching for a gun.
@ShietCard and I am not disputing that. My point is that Markeis' reaction was also over the top. But Markeis did not go ahead to kick the shit out of Drejka, he backed off when he saw himself that he may have hurt the man and situation is already in his eyes defused. Drejka on the other hand pulled out the gun when the situation was already defused and ended up shooting.
There's a clear line I am drawing - I am not defending Drejka. I am just saying that Markeis' reaction to the situation was wrong. It's the perfect example of two wrongs not making right. Both reacted wrong to the situation, except Drejka's "force multiplier" multiplied his wrong reaction above and beyond where it was necessary. That's why his actions that he deemed a self-defense are not valid. But I am pretty sure the situation would have ended up differently if instead of sucker punching a skin and bone piece of shit he initiated with "man get the fuck outta here" . Drejka was bound to kill someone with his demeanor and history of threatening people with his gun. But Markeis' actions were not justified either. If (and that is a big IF) Drejka had no intend on using his gun or had none - Markeis would be charged with assault. He'd go to jail and have legal trouble for what? Over-reacting to his wife being told not to park in handicapped spot?
My point is the situation was being defused by violence despite not needing any violence to be defused at all (by both parties). It was verbal altrecation that was escalated by Markeis and from Markeis' PoV defused at the same time. From Drejka's PoV he felt like his training at Gravy Seals finally paid off. He could have just holstered the weapon after Markeis took three steps back. There was enough time even for a person in shock to make that decision. For a person that is not ready or willing to kill that is. The correct course of action Drejka should have made would be to get up after noticing Markeis backed off, call the police and describe that he was just assaulted. That's what any reasonable person with pet peeves about handicapped signs would really do in the situation after the attacker is going back when "force multiplier" is introduced (in fact Markeis seems to be pulling back even before a gun is shown at all).
I am not fine with people shooting others for whatever reason. But are you seriously all fine with people pushing others like that? What if instead of Drejka there was an off-duty cop? What if after being pushed he splits his head open and gets internal bleeding to brain? Like you can get some serious injuries from being pushed over like that. Do you guys seriously consider Markeis' reaction to be justified? Is "defending your wife" who is clearly in the wrong (I mean why even park in handicapped spot especially when there are bunch of other spots next to it) and barely verbally attacked justifiable for you to make the move and push someone from behind? In my eyes Markeis' action was wrong. Not on the same level as Drejka's or anywhere near it. But still wrong. Drejka seems like the kind of guy that if a guy couple inches and few dozen pounds of muscle larger than him tells him "get fucked loser" that truly shits himself. But Markeis gave him his fantasy on a silver platter. He wanted to kill someone for a long time, it can be seen from the interview that he himself was in the "finally I could 'defend' myself" fantasy. If Drejka was kicking the car or posed any obvious physical danger towards Markeis' wife and children before the gun was pulled then I would say yep, Markeis' action to sucker punch him was justified and on the level of the threat. But it wasn't.
@Adrian Gorus why should the victim be the one to be “civilized?” Was the murderer civilized when he was harassing the victim’s family? NO! So he did what he had to do to defend his family. If you say he should’ve been the bigger person and talked calmly to a stranger YELLING to a woman and her kids then you should REALLY take a step back and rethink if that approach is based on your privilege as a white person, or just one that lacks critical thinking skills.
@jeremy ok ok so you just assumed my race mister... but besides that kinda racist thing i just wanna let you know that you should read before crying around because if you did then you would know that i am not justifying the shooter but im saying that the „victim“ is also at fault big time for escalating e verbal argument to a physical one... i dont know why you are so keen on glorifying anyone who gets shot
@Douglas Moore At the point Drejka fired, his life was not in jeopardy as his assailant was backing away and was unarmed and made no sort of verbal threat.
Sorry, that logic with someone taking back 0,5 or 2 steps shouldn't be takien into considaration. He is probably getting distance to hit/kick you with more force, run towards you to stomp on you, or there is something in the distance that can be used as a weapon against you. Pushing someone on the ground means that that person takes into account other hitting his head or breaking something. I would immiedietly treat this as an assault on my person.
@Soleilune "So, he should have just let the dude harass his girlfriend and kids while taking pictures of their car?" So his girlfriend should park in handicapped place, and he shouldn't take pictures for police, to not offend their feelings? She was clearly the instigator (assuming her idea, not her partners). And this argument was going on for a while, without any sign of her moving the esteemed car.
@Adrian Gorus THAT is how a normal human would behave. If I walk into a situation where my wife and children are being threatened by a stranger, I am taking defensive measures. That's the thing; the victim had the right to the self-defense defense as he had reason to believe he or his family were in danger of serious bodily harm or death. If you walked out of a store to see a stranger behaving erratically and threatening towards your family, why would you not believe they were in danger?
@James Franksain mabe because the gf/partner had the balls to open the door and try to step out idk didnt seem that hostile. And idk bout you but i feel like the part with the threat is an assumption on your side
@Adrian Gorus an assumption? It's a statement. Any reasonable person would have reason to believe the threat exists and, as the tragedy that followed indicates, they were correct in that belief. This situation just shows that, if you believe your life or the lives of your loved ones is imperiled and you are in the assailant's blindspot, don't shove; disable them and eliminate them as a threat because you never know how far the assailant is willing to go.
Man I'm just ~39% drunk, maybe more than I was ever before, I don't drink a lot, just once a month vine as I do now, I can tell you I would pull a gun out because I don't like to fight and probably would lose fight even in sober state, but still would think in this drunk state should I pull a Trigger even on a person who is holding gun pointed a me. He got what he deserved.
@Soleilune Both guys were being stupid AF, but if the other guy didn't push him on the ground none of this would have happened. All he had to do was talk to him like a normal person, if he didn't leave it alone then just move the damn car or leave it and he can call the cops if he wants to.
and people think its a good idea that everyone should be armed then there would be less shootings. Obviously they dont know the amount of people who own a gun just waiting for the slightest chance to use it
@Adrian Gorus yea, you kinda can. You are allowed to take action to defend yourself or others from a percieved threat. You put the victim on trial in this case and charge him with assault, you aren't going to get a conviction especially once the assailant's past record starts coming out. The victim's judgment of the assailant being a threat was absolutely borne out by both the events and the record of the assailant.
0 likes
Adrian Gorus2021-06-04 21:08:08 (edited 2021-06-04 21:08:21 )
@James Franksain lmao idek what your on but no violence is not broadly acceptable just because someone is standing there arguing. I dont see the immediate threat to any of the surrounding people. Following your logic the shooter was in imminent danger even though the „victim“ was walking away, ehich he wasnt. A person merely being and talking loudly is not a direct threat, only if you escalate which the „victim“ did
@JF LOVECRAFT Why his skin color is something you even consider on the justification a assaulting him is odd to me. How do you not get it? YOUR MINDSET is the SAME MINDSET he had, and turning to violence over a verbal altercation to “prove that you’re tough” is so unbelievably stupid. Dude, everyone either gets bullied or gets shit talked at some point in their life. Only hot headed people with poor self control and a childish mindset like “I’m tough I’ll show you” physically assault people over heated words. Grow up.
@JF LOVECRAFT And if you would, don’t assume I’d shoot someone in this stupid situation without actually having something to quote me on that would insinuate that. Me explaining the potential mindset of the shooter is not grounds for assuming I’d do the same.
@JF LOVECRAFT Nope. I explained the potential mindset of the shooter, and why it can be much more complicated than “shooting him because he was pushed.” I never once even implied that I shared the same mindset myself. And there’s no fighting that needs to happen at all. What is it with this “being a man” bullshit? The most mature thing you can do is not get into a fight over stupid shit. You’re just repeatedly projecting the same mindset that got him killed onto me. Just, don’t do what he did. As you can clearly see, it can lead to a fatally escalated situation in the blink of an eye. All you have to do is get your family and leave.
@Yung Tux bro yes it is. In a situation that’s obvious as fuck, every possible mindset possibly discussed already, dude was still determined guilty. He clearly was the aggressor, he clearly only felt compelled to say something because he knew he kill somebody, and dude was clearly backing away long enough for him to realize he didn’t need to shoot.
@Adrian Gorus here's the thing: I don't buy your argument. I don't even think you really do. It's nonsense. You're arguing that a strange man yelling into a car containing a woman and children and behaving erratically isn't threatening. Like. I don't even understand the thought process that would lead you to that conclusion. If a strange man started yelling into my vehicle I would feel threatened. More so if I wasn't in my vehicle but my wife and/or kid(s) were. In this case, you have a man yelling into a vehicle and behaving erratically; he is already engaged in a conflict. "Just walking up and talking to him" is bad judgment as you are ceding the advantage of surprise against an assailant of unknown strength but known agression. Basically, on that point, you're arguing that you shouldn't kick a guy mugging you in the testes because it's not sporting.
@JF LOVECRAFT Are we seriously pretending like I’m defending this guy? I know he’s guilty, and I know he deserves to be guilty. That’s not what we’re talking about anymore. What we’re talking about is the, frankly disturbing, fact that you can watch a video showing what can happen when you needlessly escalate a verbal altercation to a physical level, and still actively defend that behavior. This is why you lack self awareness. This mindset you’re supporting contributed to his death that day, and you think that needlessly starting fights has anything to do with being a man. Ignorance.
@Adrian Gorus I see. So you're not taking into account the volume of the altercation or his posture and body language. Or maybe you've just never been assaulted before so you don't know what threatening behavior looks like outside of a movie. If that is the case, I am truly happy for you with zero sarcasm. It is not a pleasant experience. As for the 'mugging' analogy; You said in an earlier comment something about guessing that next time you see some guys "yelling some meanies" at your friends you should WWE slam them on the hood of your car and attributed that to my argument. I don't believe you have the moral high ground here when it comes to artistic license.
@James Franksain ok my man idk if your being serious here and yes i have been assaulted and i literally just talked about his posture and body language so idk chief
@Yung Tux I got shoved in elementary school once does that justify me going on a John Wick adventure to assassinate him because he practiced the weakest piece of violence against me?
@JF LOVECRAFT The wife and children were in the car and in NO danger at all. Just because your gf has an argument with someone, doesnt give you the right to use violence. The man was not showing physical aggression. He went straight to the man and without a word shoved him heavy. I am not saying he deserved what he got, because clearly that is not the case.
@Soleilune Yes. He should not have been violent. Because shouting is not the same as actually getting physical. He could have killed the angry white guy. The white guy had no assaulted his girlfriend. The problem with some people is that they become physical. Under no circumstances should you assault another person unless it's in self defense. Here Drejka was not assaulting anyone. Now Drejka should not have shot the guy, for sure, but the incident would not have occurred if common decency and common sense was applied. US is a country full of guns and aggro people. You don't push people around. You de-escalate. You get in your car and you drive off. Be the more mature person. Don't be a child who was wrong anyway because it was a handicapped bay anyhow.
@Byronic 09 there’s no reason to say “I don’t think he deserved what he got” (which means you’re saying he’s the clear victim in the situation) then turn around and say he’s the reason he got shot. It can’t be both. He either caused his own death or he didn’t.
@JF LOVECRAFT No, what I am saying is the black man was wrong to shove the white man. The white man was wrong to shoot the black man. One wrong thing doesnt make another wrong thing automatically right.
@NotRelatedByBlood Nope. Especially considering the context of your situation was an elementary school quarrel. I don’t know why I need to explain the difference between the two situations and how that analogy doesn’t work. I also don’t know why I need to explain that I’m not defending his actions, because I’ve already stated that he was in the wrong. They were both in the wrong. It’s a given that the shooter is wrong in this situation, but I was explaining that he wasn’t shot FOR shoving him, but because of what that sudden turn to violence could have been leading to. The fact that he pulled out his gun is fine, the fact that he shot him after they had stepped away is the problem. I called out the “shot for shoving” thing because it rings the same bell as “shot for sleeping” or “shot for jogging down the wrong road”, where people conveniently skip one huge part of the confrontation that resulted in someone’s death for the sake of their narrative. So I wanted to explain the obvious that he wasn’t shot FOR shoving.
@JF LOVECRAFT He played a part in his own death. Had he not assaulted that guy for no good reason, he wouldn’t have gotten shot, but had that other guy NOT SHOT HIM, then he’d also still be alive. Shared blame for sure, but one guy is guilty of assault and dead, and the other is guilty of murder and alive.
@NJSmashBros If you consider yourself a reasonable person, would you shoot someone because they pushed away from his family because YOU were yelling at them? It’s a yes or no question.
@JF LOVECRAFT What do you not get?Starting a physical altercation over a verbal one is NOT CALLED FOR. Look where that gets you. Adults can’t just go around assaulting people who tick them off, it gets you arrested, and sometimes, hurt, clearly. That has been spelt out in front of you in this video and by me and you just don’t seem to care. Despite the horrible results of the behavior you support being shown to you, you’d still act like assaulting people over a verbal argument is acceptable behavior. DID YOU WATCH THE VIDEO?
@awesome sauce hahahaha man idk bout you but i think that shoving is definitely a prove of intent as agressive reaction and thereby giving the shooter an opportunity to use his power and still his hunger for might so i think that that guy would not have shot anyone if he didnt feel like he was in the right.
Sad that there are people defending this man. Did you hear him? In regards to people “being in that spot” and “waiting on somebody” he has a “pet peeve about it,” this man left his house and decided to be the handicap parking spot hero for the day, acting as judge jury and executioner to fulfill that role. It’s honestly sickening. Imagine being killed because this guy had a “pet peeve” about where you were parked. It’s scary, and if the guy hadn’t come out of the store when he did, I fear those babies would have been without a mother instead or even in addition. My heart hurts for this family. This guy is delusional.
I can’t speak for anyone defending Michael and I believe his conviction is probably justified, however, I have a hard time feeling bad for the man who pushed him, and for that reason feel a bit conflicted about this case. Think about it, if you go about life with a policy of physically imposing yourself onto people, especially complete strangers, you’re asking for a comeuppance. Think about how different this would have looked if Michael was an intimidating and physically imposing young man. Certainly, the victim would have considered a different route of action in confronting the situation nonviolently. However, Drejka isn’t any of those things, and when McGlockton escalated the situation to a level totally disproportionate to the threat present, he invited upon himself a retribution in kind. Drejka isn’t right in what he did at all, but anybody who goes through life with the same policy for physical escalation as McGlockton demonstrated should be prepared for when they run into triggerhappy nutjob.
@Kyle Guzzardo when someone threatens your wife and kids, especially some creepy old dude, you step in and try to force any kind of conflict onto you so that your family is safe. especially as the argument already seemed heated. you dont have time to reflect your life choices and think about the possibility of some lunatic immediatly gunning you down
@Kyle Guzzardo I dunno. Some weirdo circling you car with wife and kids inside? As a parent, I'd get pretty defensive too. Was it right he got shoved? No. But what did this jackwagon expect? He was looking for trouble. He already had complaints regarding road rage and threatening people with his gun. He wanted a fight so he could use it on someone and finally feel like a big man. Guy is as transparent as a ghost. He's a poster child for why not everyone should be allowed to carry.
3 likes
Danna Pettit2021-06-10 04:00:49 (edited 2021-06-10 04:01:35 )
@Kyle Guzzardo one of the tenets of conceal carry is to attempt to avoid confrontation to begin with because you DO have a weapon and you DON'T want to actually use it. This guy has spent the last 25 years of his life just hoping for the opportunity to shoot someone. If he was truly a responsible firearm owner he would have minded his own business when it came to ridiculous nit picky stuff like handicap parking spots at "his gas station".
@Nahala Stone I completely agree with your assessment of Drejka. I would go further and argue that any adult should understand that there exists Drejkas out in the world, that there are disempowered people just waiting for an opportunity to feel powerful. What I’m saying is that McGlockton escalated conflict with Drejka into physical assault in incredibly foolish manner. Why open yourself up to an assault charge, or worse, give a stranger any reason to return the use of force on you? Of course we should protect your loved ones, but a shouting match out in public is no cause to physically exert yourself on someone. McGlockton was understandably angry, but using physical force to intimidate submission from a stranger is foolish, foolish, foolish. Just tell the bastard to fuck off and leave, right?
It actually bothers me that if he had a lawyer and the lawyer told him exactly what to say to get off, that he most likely would've gotten off. That's messed up.
I agree with your point, however, I would bet that he wouldnt have gotten off scott-free, but likely could have gotten a lesser charge. Remember, it is better for us, the pleebs, to allow 100 guilty people free than falsely imprison 1 innocent person.
People walking around thinking they're G.I Joe, roleplaying as law enforcement lol. The way he was using certain phrases as if he was apart of the force. What a waste of atoms this guy is.
I could SEE how someone could make a case for being legitimately scared of significant bodily harm after being pushed from a sizeable dude like that and then him lifting his shirt waistband the way he did. But Michael waited enough time after pulling out his pistol to see the other guy wasn't about to keep being aggressive, then decided "you know what, I want to shoot this man for pushing me to the ground" which is NOT okay.
It is okay actually. That savage guy isn't going to be pushing innocent strangers to the ground ever again. Imagine how many people have head injuries, brain damage, or are unable to walk again etc. because of the violent rage from a guy that attacks people who are simply talking to other people.
@Kyle G He pushed him because small children were in the car and he see’s someone yelling at them. Maybe scary them. Since Mike initiated the fight, he also told the cops that he wasn’t scared because he brings a gun. Which means he put himself in situations where he may have to use a gun to get out of it
@Kyle G Um, he was yelling at his wife and the kids. I agree that the push was maybe not helpful, but it's understandable that a dad wants to protect his wife and kids.
@ann Early You realize that its not against the law to talk loudly to another person right? So he didn't do anything wrong there, they were the ones actually breaking the law which is why he confronted them.
@Josie Koch Do you believe that its a completely normal reaction to attack a person for yelling at your wife while she is currently committing a crime?
@Kyle G actually Michael was also parked illegally which is fucking ironic. He was confronting people with a gun in his pocket over illegal parking while parking illegally himself lmao
@Mira .45 did you watch the video? JCS even points out several times that Drejkas own testimony points out that he didn’t believe eh was actually in fear of his own life, he exited the scene with a SORE shoulder and arm. Didn’t even break.
I just don’t see how you can say it “hard. Really hard” it was a shove. It looks different to different people but the facts are facts. Drejkas own words, and the injuries he sustained combined with the fact the victim actually stepped away before being shot means drejka is simply a murderer.
Having a gun doesn’t mean you can shoot people because they’re mean to you. Even if they commit battery, you still don’t get to murder them outright.
@Mira .45 He did defend himself by pulling the gun. The guy retreats, he shoots him anyway. Thats not self defense.
And don't be berating someones family if you don't want an altercation. Mind your own fucking business and you wouldn't be in prison and a man wouldn't be dead and his family ruined.
@ann Early And seeing daddy pushing a man over isn't going to scare the kids worse? That poor Dad should have got in the car and left, but ultimately he was the victim here, even if his actions weren't ideal, he didn't deserve a bullet. Poor kids.
@Joel McKnight Doesn't matter how "hard" the push is, if you fall and fall wrong you can fucking die. Someone can punch you and if you are caught off guard and fall smashing your skull into the concrete you can die right there and then. This guy was pushed from behind so he certainly wasn't guarding against a sudden force and shouldn't have shot but simply called the police and waited, even so being rude and yelling at people is just that, being rude. We don't live in the fucking stone age and you don't have the right to physically assault someone because they're rude. He wasn't kicking or scratching at their car, he wasn't beating the shit out of his wife and kids, this guy came out of the store and his first reaction was not to tell the rude guy to back off and leave them alone but immediately launch into a physical confrontation. Play stupid games win stupid prizes. I can't imagine living in the U.S. where there are far more guns than people and just attacking someone who is being aggressive with no thought given that they just might be this way because they have a gun.
@Miadolph72 73 So you a think walking up to someone and starting a argument over a parking spot is reasonable? Especially if it's not affecting you directly at all. You think it's the guys fault who died? Are you serious?! The man who fired his weapon hand done that sort of thing 4 times prior and he isn't in the wrong at all? You disgust me...you ideology is screwed and you need help.
@Didace Matthews No I don’t, he should have minded his own business. However, once the guy came out of the store and escalated the situation it was a game on. There is no doubt in my mind that had he not shot him he would have done serious damage to him. What was he supposed to do, lay on his back and wait for this obviously bigger and clearly violent (already established) individual to pounce on him? You cant possible out yourself in that mans shoes who no doubt feared for his life. When you put your hands on someone there is no telling what will happen. Play stupid games get stupid prizes.
Yeah there is a solid case to be made the response was somewhat reasonable if not for the fact the camera caught that the guy was pulling away. As someone who's been in quote a few fights things can go south really quick. I have seen a guy be killed from a single punch when I was 15. If he had continued the killing would have been regrettable but could have been justified. But as soon as he started backing away the gun did it's job and that should have been the end of it.
@Josie Kosch No, it's not. If you engage with someone physically it's pure chance whether they die or not. As mentioned above I have witnessed firsthand someone die from a single punch. He shouldn't have shot him as he had started to pull away but it could very easily have been reversed roles.
You know, the laws were made for the law breakers. The guy should not have put his family in jeopardy and park where he would be legal. And when confronted even knowing he was in violation of the law would not accept reprimand and chose to push the guy. None of it's pretty. It's a case where evil is destroying evil. When do you start commending what's right?
@James Trail @James Trail "Evil is destroying evil", "Putting his family in jeopardy by parking". You guys need to stop with the victim blaming and grow a pair of brain cells. Hint: You don't deserve death for parking in a handicap parking for a couple of mins. It being brief doesn't justify breaking the law but it's far from warranting death. And no laws were not made for law breakers, they are *made to keep order* . Even so they are human made and they have flaws. There are plenty of non aggressive ways to resolve the situation and I guarantee you if a kid is tough enough to pick himself after getting hurt in the playground, it doesn't take much to suck up your pride. He clearly suffered no injuries from it while shooting a human dead was justified. The worst part of it all is that if he had a lawyer before speaking he probably would have gotten away with it too
This is the only reply that actually gets to the core of the issue.
I don't understand how some people interpreted this as him shooting someone over parking on a disabled parking lot—it's about him shooting after it was clear that he wasn't in any imminent danger after firing.
I'd say he was justified in and up to getting mad at someone for parking on a disabled parking lot illegally, and pulling a gun (in America) when assaulted from another unknown assailant. But, then pausing after his assailant stops his attack and backs off after seeing the gun, and THEN shooting after he has had time to deliberate is the crime.
@Oxydino oh Jesus christ. You can accidentally die if someone bumps into you, and you fall and hit your head on something. The likelihood of something like that happening is extremely rare
@Oxydino i don't think the guy should've shoved him? You're arguing that its reasonable for the dude to fear for his life because people die from getting shoved. Which is an incredibly dumb argument.
"I just love how because one guy pulled a gun, we must justify the other one using violence" ... I honestly have no idea what you're talking about dude. Should the guy have shoved him? No. Is it reasonable to fear for your life if someone shoves you, ESPECIALLY if you already have a gun on you? No. Dunno why you're getting so worked up about this
@ICryAllDayAllNight I never said he feared for his life, hell I said that he should be punished for killing a man so don't project. We don't know what was going on in his head, maybe he felt that fear and maybe he didn't. He looked like the type who'd think he was "weak" if he admitted that he was afraid so I don't really put much weight in his words. Don't act like your statement wasn't made to minimise assault, because it clearly was and in doing so you are trying to argue that the guy who died was innocent, which he wasn't. That being said, two wrongs don't make a right. This is just a situation that could have very easily been resolved had a single mature adult been involved instead it's just a bunch of children and lunatics.
Yeah maybe if he had shot a second or a second thirty before he did I would believe he was justified. This is just because 2.3 seconds (or whatever it was) in my opinion was enough to realize he was backing off. This going off of the footage of course
@Milktube You are not very observant, are you? Innocent stranger? The shooter started the whole thing, dude. He harassed the couple. There was nothing "innocent" about him--just the opposite. Pay attention to facts.
@Kyle G He was yelling at the couple and harassing them. He wasn't just "speaking" to the wife. He instigated the whole thing--and was happy to because he figured that he could just claim self-defense is anybody took exception to his bull$hit.
@Terrestrial Creature EXACTLY there were so many chances to avoid this situation,the only one i feel sorry for is the poor kid who had to watch his father die
None of it would have happened in the first place if the guy hadn't been parked in a handicap space with no right to do so. They had no reason to be parked in a handicap parking space.
War Dog that’s not what the jury thought. Self defense when the guy is walking backwards. That guy was waiting to do that to someone and he picked on the women because he’s a coward. Again he’s the last person who should own a gun.
@War Dog did you... not watch this video? the deceased shoved this guy and he fell on the ground. he pulled out his gun and aimed it, and the deceased took steps back, starting to turn away. and then this guy shot.
@War Dog ??? drejka pulled out his gun WHILE he was on the ground, meaning after he was shoved. drejka was never holding the gun while he was still harassing the woman in the car. and what do you mean "if he had backed away he wouldn't be anywhere near the gunman"? he shoved him, meaning space was created between the two of them. he was clearly about to approach him again, drejka pulled out his gun, and then he took steps back, like i originally wrote. or maybe you're just seeing what you want to see. do you need me to timestamp all of this? there is literal footage in case you forgot?? you're either confusing this footage with another incident or just making up an excuse for drejka to shoot a man outside a 7-11 over a handicap parking space. ridiculous.
Sir Leopold2021-06-02 22:34:51 (edited 2021-06-02 23:04:04 )
I'd honestly have a lot more respect for this man if he just said "i panicked because I was pushed, I wasn't thinking straight and shot first asked questions later." But instead he had to make a bunch of stuff up. This guy was cocky and angry and just looking for an excuse to use his weapons, imo.
This is one of the best responses on this page. I followed this case from the day it happened, and the shooting itself was pretty textbook self defense, it was the shooters actions before the shooting, and the way he responded after the shooting that got him thrown in jail. That said, shoving a man to the ground like that is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury, and had the guy that got shot continued his attack in any way, the shooter would have been completely justified. Dude panicked, like most of us would, and was likely knocked senseless in the initial attack, he should have just admitted it instead of pretending to be Capt swat commander.
@Don Quasebarth lmfao at "knocked senseless". I've been hit harder in pee wee football when I was 11 and I wasn't "knocked senseless". He had a full 2 seconds prior to pulling the trigger on a man backing away (read de-escalating). Seems like he though through his actions.
@Robert Slusher well yea at 11 you're healing faster, your fall isn't as high, you have better reflexes to catch yourself and prevent serious harm but I still agree the shooting was unjustified, even still the victim is at fault of his own aswell
@Robert Slusher I've gotten hit quite hard in my youth, and been hit quite hard later in life. Theres absolutely no comparison between a 12 year old playing football, expecting to be hit, and a middle age man blindsided and hit hard enough to throw him several feet. When I was twelve I used to jump out of trees quite high in the air, and just last week I tore my knee up walking into a table. Older bodies are more frail. If this guy didnt get the wind knocked out of him and become momentarily disoriented I'd be suprised, because that is the norm for these kinds of violent assaults. Nobody in this scenario did the right thing, from the illegal parking, to the stupid arguement, battery that prompted the shooting.
Fun fact: on average, it takes a person under stress roughly 1 second to process a changing situation and form a response to it. This guy took more than double that time. He thought about it, decided he had a case for self-defense, and went for the kill.
I think he might've went back and forth inside his mind at that time. First he drew the gun with the intention to shoot, then he thought about how he'd get charged for doing so, knowing that what he's doing is wrong, but then he realized he has an opportunity to kill someone and get away with it, since he can plead self defense, to then later brag about to friends. I hate his guts.
Keep in mind, he's 46 and so his brain probably processes slower than someone in their prime, also the pain from landing on concrete would've caused an adrenaline flood and would've clouded his thinking more
@Near pod Wtf lmao, me saying that landing on your wrist on concrete fuckin hurts makes me a racist? I'm just talking from experience since I've skated for 3 years. Maybe don't call people racist as your first argument because they say that landing on a hard surface hurts lol
@Autumn May ‘the average human’ has nothing to do with being in someone’s prime. Being 46 does not mean your brain functions twice as slowly as the average. That would also suggest that you believe the ‘average human’ is someone in their twenties or thirties. And that the study which results were referred to only used people in this age range in the study. Which doesn’t make any sense. Secondly, adrenaline flush happens in stressed quickly changing situations, which is exactly what was mentioned. Falling onto concrete does in no way change your bain’s capability to asses situations and form responses. The devil has enough advocates, please don’t try to discredit when your argument is so easily torn to shreds by common logic
@nat I simply don't believe someone with this low of brain capacity could jump back and forth and decide he could win a lawsuit before trying to kill, considering he didnt seem to know if his bullet even hit and wanted to know what happened. If he was trying to kill I doubt he'd shoot once, then assume he did it, he doesnt even seem like someone out for bloodlust. I think he fell down, misguidedly thought the man was stepping towards him and shot. We can all have our opinions but I dont believe he could logic out the situation in 2.5 seconds
@nat Also, yes, pain does affect alot. Your brain flushes your system with adrenaline to help with the pain so you dont feel it as immediately, that can also affect vision and thinking. Its dumb to think pain simply didnt factor into the equation
@Autumn May that pain argument isn't very powerful if you go back to around 18:40 he talks about how hard the shive was. But around that same time he says he felt non of it. Edit: He also specifies that he was only slightly dazed and not very dazed.
@Bizness man He didnt feel it at the time because of the adrenaline flush to block out the pain, because that's what the body does. I'm just saying that that probably had an effect on his thinking. Even pain aside I don't personally see this man as the type to be able to fully asses a situation and correct his decision accordingly in 2.5 seconds, especially after being physically assaulted just before
@Autumn May well even then he explicitly goes to out of his way to specify his condition to be a little dazed even when he wasn't asked im not saying your wrong but with him saying that he's implying the the pain was not enough to impair his judgement
@Bizness man Fair point, I think it's always up for debate, thanks for being civil about it all. Even though we have different views. I've been called racist more than once over this... because if you have an opinion someone disagrees with you're a terrible human now I guess
@AusDenBergen I've had people try to stomp my foot intentionally. I'd argue that it may be more painful than being pushed onto a flat concrete parking lot.
"Someone argue with my wife about wrong parking" "What happened next?" "I dont try to argue like a human being, and i brutally push this 50yo man on the ground" "What happened next?" "I thought i was the strongest alpha male, but no dice, he had a piece"
@Ahmed Hussain 21 feet is roughly thr distance an attacker with a knife can close the distance before a person can react draw and fire. Outside 21 feet the gun wins, inside 21 feet the knife (when gun is holstered) can win
Stop downplaying what the victim did.. if he didnt have a gun it was getting worse for him.. he pulled up his shorts before seeing a gun which is an offensive stance taken before taking a fight..he was untrained to hzndle such situation and and pressure blurred his thinking and fired when he shouldnt have
@N V the point is that getting punched is not the same as getting killed. Equivalent force rules are in effect when you have the upper hand. Restraint, willpower and discipline are required, things this guy clearly lacks.
@Jintaro Kensei and i agree with that.. but also.. arguing verbally is not the same as getting pushed to the ground.. he could have broken his arm.. and the guy was ready to do more... it sucks that the guys was stupid not to realize he was backing away... but we cant downplay how aggressive the victim was... if u have a much stronger and younger guy coming to fight u.. then its not really a fair fight.. so it is fair that he needed a weapon to defend him self.. its just stupid and wrong. that he took the decision to fire when he was backing away.
The guy views the police officers as equals and friends rather than superiors who are trying to send him to jail. But lol I’m grateful because this really fucked his case over
That's what police officers do. Civilians aren't allowed to lie to police but police are completely allowed to lie which really leads to scummy behavior. Furthermore, they are really focused on elevating their careers so they don't care about ensnaring innocent people. Then, you mix their intelligence and things like the blue line, you really get a screwed up justice system.
@Shnood typing emojis and mocking someone isn’t going to help push this argument. You need to be able to realize how that can trap and ensnare innocent people into coming across as guilty for a crime they didn’t commit
If he wasnt breaking the law, illegally parking in a handicapped space and unlawfully assaulted him he would still be alive today. Unfortunate the man he assaulted was likely a racist looking for a reason to kill a black man. But regardless it all started with him being a jerk. Sad story all around, except for the part where this guy spends his life where he belongs, in prison.
As someone who uses a wheelchair, I don’t consider it my job to police this type of situation. If someone is parking in a disabled parking spot then I would go into the shopping centre (for example) and speak to management. You don’t know who’s driving the car and what sort of person they are.
Exactly! I am disabled and have a placard but I don’t consider myself the parking police. If non-disabled people want to be allies, being the parking police is not the way to do it.
you never know someone's situation, so I definitely appreciate this. like I don't have a placard, but I just had heart surgery a couple of weeks ago and have found myself needing to do this for picking up medication or other small things
@Alli M. Exactly, you never know someone's situation. Not to mention, as someone with a disability that is evident and obvious to all, I get annoyed by always being labelled as it is. Subsequently, someone with a heart condition, for example, may not want to be labelled as disabled. It is just not up to the public to police these situations.
@Sounds of a Silent Mind correct, ultimately this was a traffic violation not a life or death/ combative/ emergency situation. It's so sad all those lives were forever impacted by something that should have been at most a ticket
@Sounds of a Silent Mind and as far as "disabled" I can't really get a placard because it was not a physical handicap as much as a rough recovery from a major surgery. My recovery period is not long enough to warrant a placard.
@Alli M. That must be annoying for you. I'm sure they could have handed out a temporary placard. Unfortunately, many people don't understand the reason why there are disabled allocated car parking places. Because a wheelchair symbol designates them as such, many people think that if you're not using a wheelchair or an ambulatory device, then you shouldn't use them. However, as you realise, they are put close to entrances of shopping centres so that people who cannot walk long distance can use them also. Having major surgery means the last thing you want to do is walk more than a minute to get inside the centre.
Besides, there are people who may have a good reason to use a disabled parking spot without having a disabled parking badge. A relative of mine suffers from a strange case of bowel incontinence - essentially, he can't feel when he has to go to the toilet, until it's extremely urgent. At times, this means he has to park his car and go to the toilet in a store - and sometimes, the parking spot for disabled people is the only spot left. The riddiculous thing is that this is recognized legally as a disability, but due to the laws here, you only get a parking badge if your disability affects your ability to walk.
@MechMK1 That's very unfair for your relative. Incontinence of any type is extremely socially isolating for the person suffering. It's hard enough people with that condition to go out as it is.
@Sounds of a Silent Mind Indeed, but it's the result of the law mandating that parking badges are only handed out to people with impaired mobility. It really is a shame.
I have had many instances where I have driven my disabled mother around and parked disabled. Sometimes my mother doesnt have the strength to stay in the store so will return to the car. My mother is only 45 and i am in my 20s so there have been a few times where i have been accused of "not being disabled" or "taking the spot from another person who needs it". But never have someone been this aggresive to me. It's really not that serious, nor is it your business to confront someone about it
@Crime Brûlée exactly mfs that try to be “allies” be doing the extremes that don’t actually help anyone. like go vote on something about rights for people with disabilities. don’t shoot someone who is using the EMPTY parking space like it’d be different if a handicapped person was in the parking lot but there was no one even trying to use the spot. in that situation you just ignore it……….
Lemme guess... he fantasied for 26 years using that fire arm, day after day he tried to put himself in such a position where he could escalate a situation until finally he could shoot at somebody.
Pretty much what he is, looking at his gun getting a hard on, thinking boy I cant wait to use this.. he had four prior road rage related incident where he threatened them with a gun. Even a mom and her kids.
Just like Michael Dunn. His neighbour from a place where he lived before Satellite Beach said Dunn previously stated that he would want to shoot someone (or something to that effect).
Interesting how his arm is so hurt he needs to use his shirt as a sling for it, but the moment he starts reenacting the scene from the floor he can gesture and all with it no issue....
Let’s all agree Dumb met Dumber that day. Marquis made a Grave mistake putting his hands on someone even if Moron was yapping about a Handicap Spot. Think before you react goes both ways.
@Poker Joker facts don’t go around pushing punching a guy cuz he is telling your girl friend to park correctly, maybe if he would’ve acted like a rational civilized human being he would still be living but nope wanted to act out now look he got killed at a gas station lmao xD
@semaj yar I agree that he shouldn’t have pushed the guy, but if you have a problem with someone parking in a handicap spot, you can easily tell someone in the store or call the police, it simple.
@Poker Joker Yeah agreed. They were both. Marquis didn't deserve nor was Micheal justified. A murd3r is a murd3r. But both parties were wrong in this one.
@commoguru What he did wasn't protecting his family. He blindsided a guy to the ground for being in a verbal argument with his spouse. An argument that he had 0 reason to believe was going to get physical since neither party was approaching the other.
If things had turned out differently and the other didn't have a weapon on hand, he would have been charged with assault.
@semaj yar shoving a man doesn't call for death. he clearly stepped away when the defendant pulled out his weapon, there was no need to shoot, he already made his point.
@semaj yar damn….I just seen you apologized …. I was going to delete my comment but that would be hiding my mistake. So my bad. Just got heated when I read your comment and responded with out reading any other comments. You apologized like a real one. My apologies.
@HELP!!! hOW dO InPUt uSeRnAMe? Yea, he was protecting his family, he had no way of knowing what that guy's intentions are. Could have easily been someone road raging. Simple fact is, you don't approach occupied vehicles in an aggressive manner like that, he's lucky he wasn't the one shot.
i think he realized that and thats when he brought up his arm hurting again 😄 this guy is so pathetic and lame. "Should the video show him charging at you?" "It should" what do you mean it should?
Yeah but he watched him run away. An argument could have been made that he didn’t want to kill him. Unfortunately he died but one bullet isn’t always fatal
@jeremy mullens Could've aimed at somewhere other than center mass then. The prosecution was right though; there was no reason to fire at all when simply keeping that gun raised had already neutralized the threat.
If he hadn’t had a gun and the guy pushed him down then stomped on his head, would it have been warranted? Was the pushing for talking to the woman warranted? These things are rarely so black and white affairs. The tragedy remains that a man died and another man lost his freedom. But, all parties involved seem like assholes to me. That’s all I call them: assholes. I’m not calling them evil or malicious. It’s a grey area, and I have no more righteousness in me than the poor wretches in this incident.
@rat bastian Yeah, I don't think any one action in that chain of events was justified. It was all stupid crap that got real damn serious. I'm not defending either party. And I don't think it's psycho to look deeper at things. If it was my jury I would want some critical minds on the bench. And yeah, it's a fucking tragedy that a man lost his life and a man lost his freedom. Maybe you've never had to take those things from someone. You can do it and it can be justified and you may have no regrets about it whatsoever, except that it is always an assault on your own dignity to have to take that from another. Leastways, if you're not a psycho.
@Bex Kroezen It's relevant because to justify the shooting Wannabe Cop had to believe that he was about to get his head stomped. As I said, that did not happen, so we cannot know.
@TheSirPrise Okay, so if you're always to aim for centre mass (interesting information btw, I didn't know that), you need to accept the fact that any shot can (and assume it will) be fatal.
@free_live_free - No I've certainly never taken someone's life and if you think having you freedom taken away for something like that is tragic, THAT is psychotic to me. Analytical doesn't mean you give both sides equal treatment, in fact it's exactly the opposite - you give each side it's DUE treatment. The jury had all the facts, it's literally on video. Glockerton pushing Drejka over is a hundred times more justified in terms of defense (he was defending his family), and anything else you try and make up is flat out wrong. That's the end of it.
@theninjascientist Exactly, you never aim your gun unless you mean to shoot to kill. It's a heavy responsibility. Warning shots are also illegal and you can be taken to court for shooting it in the air or at the ground etc. That's why in situations like these lawyers and gun instructors etc., always advice that you emphasise "my life was in immanent danger" because if the case goes to court then the prosecution can try and work all sorts of angles as to why the force was disproportionate to the threat. They also advise that if you do carry the gun and do follow through with using it in self-defence that you should always expect legal backlash in one form or another, it's inevitable. That's why you need to emphasise 'my life was in immanent danger' to put yourself firmly in the lines of self-defence and so the police and prosecution have no wiggle room to put you in a different category (e.g. manslaughter or homicide). The police don't care about who is right or wrong, they're there to fill quotas and to ascend the career ladder.
@rat bastian When you lock a man up, take him into custody, make him dependent on you for his survival, it is a hit on YOUR dignity. The criminal, presumably, got what he deserved. His incarceration is not something you should revel in. Unless you're a psychotic and then you shouldn't hold such power. Glockerton didn't deserve to die. That was tragic. Drejka got awarded what he was due from society, locked up. Correct and in line with the letter of the law and tragic. None of that dumb shit needed to happen.
everyone was in wrong here, she shouldn't have parked there, he shouldnt have tried to enforce the law without being law enforcement, the victim shouldn't have shoved him to the ground, and he shouldnt have opened fire.
When this first happened, I said that the case could go either way based on interviews/ confessions/ attorney/ and jury. But once I learned he pulled his gun multiple times during road rage incidents, he lost all possible support from me. Dude was looking for trouble and had an ego due to his gun. I know dozens of people that have carried for decades. I think there is 1 that actually pulled on a person and that was home intruder. I my self have around 15 years carrying and have never pulled but some how this dude has used his gun 4 or 5 times as a civilian in roughly 25 years? Nope. Nope. Nope.
@The PineApple definitely seems like he had an ego. I am kind of surprised that after 4 or 5 times being involved in road rage cases that included his gun they didn't revoke his concealed license/permit. Maybe I am just good at avoiding confrontation but I don't believe I have ever been in a road rage incident that goes further than getting cut off and having someone flip the bird.
This goes way beyond simple ego. You have to have a twisted mind to seek an opportunity to put a hole through someone with the intent to murder.
Plenty of people get pissed easily. Many more are way too prideful. But to let it get the better of you to kill someone without cause, and also seek to avoid taking responsibility for your actions? Evil.
@No Fux never said I was better. I might have better de-escalation ability. Might have more situational awareness. Might have better common sense. Probably better training. But I didn't say I was better than him.
Not once in my entire life have I even remotely considered getting on someone’s patreon but today is the day that changes. I’m officially addicted and ive burned through all your vids.
The only Patreon I’ve ever joined is JCS! He is brilliant and I can’t wait to watch him have his on show on the ID Channel someday or something! He’s brilliant!
It's not worth it. He's got 33,982 patreons. So he;s making $33,000 a month and in total on his channel he's got 24 videos. And I'm one of his Patreon subscribers. You're earning boatloads so make boatloads of videos!
@mweil1 He has several more videos on his Patreon. That's the point. A lot of this type of content is restricted or demonitized on YouTube so by paying as little as a dollar a month you have so much more of his content.
Like I said, he's got 24 videos on his patreon, I've watched them all. They're good, but for the amount of money he's making, he should be making wayyyyy more videos.
Today I've learnt that if a cop says "I'm just trying to understand" they already understand what happened
4897 likesReplies (28)
😂😂
16 likes"I'm just trying to understand how to get you the maximum sentence possible"
298 likes@White Fox as they should
33 likes@Shnood I would love to hear what they are really thinking while they are talking to the suspects.
65 likes@White Fox that's kinda what this channel is. inside the mind of an interrogator
46 likesIf they bother to bring you in at all they've probably got your azz nailed and are only tryin to provide context for the DA to further leverage against you.
11 likesJust like the ol' "It's not you..." when you breaking up w somebody.
6 likes@Portalmaster GC Not exactly, it explains their methods of interrogation, but we still can't know what were their personal thoughts.
6 likesOnce they read your rights, stop talking and get a lawyer. Cooperate with where they want you to go, but don't answer anything.
23 likesjust one of their many tactics
0 likes@White Fox most likely thinking about how to worsen the person there sitting across’s life as much as humanly possible
2 likes@Poker Joker Learnt and Learned, both are correct, smh.
3 likes@Rod Evans Most of the english speaking world uses learnt US and Canada uses learned
2 likes@William Knight the fact is, he was so happy to have murdered a guy that he needed to brag about it with the interrogators. And that's exactly how you tell a ruthless killer from a person who just temporarily snapped and made a stupid decision.
5 likes@Rod Evans mate you clearly live in a cave, "learnt" is indeed a valid word to be used instead of "learned"
0 likes@Rod Evans you and @Poker Joker need to chill... both words are correct lmao
0 likesLearnt 🤣
0 likesNever consent to police interrogation. Wait for your lawyer. You have your day in court. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
2 likesWrong lesson. The lesson you should have learned is "don't talk to cops" not "now I have a better understanding of what cops are saying when they talk to me"
0 likesMy ex used to do that. It was annoying AF.
0 likes@Portalmaster GC not really. The narrator has the power of hindsight.
0 likesFacts
0 likesIKR
0 likes@V -yrz The guy carries a gun with him when he's doing errands around his neighbourhood. He's lived his whole life waiting for his moment to "justify" murdering someone. How quickly he pulled out the "21 foot rule" implies he was hoping someone would act threateningly within 21 feet of him at some point in his life. This was like hitting the jackpot for this guy.
3 likesI’m just trying to understand, “you didn’t say anything to him?” He must have asked him that 6 times. He dug himself deeper every time he said no.
2 likesLike when a women says " i just want to know what happen... majority of the time she already knows, she just wants to see if your going to lie to her face
0 likesExcept all the times they obviously didn't understand
0 likesI've learned that if a cop is being nice to you, you're already fucked. Just shut up and ask for a lawyer.
0 likesThe irony of him parking illegally in order to tell someone they're parked illegally sums up the situation perfectly
2421 likesReplies (28)
I think he parked there temporarily because he actually wanted her parking space.
35 likes@Max 404 oooooh.... that makes it all better then.
42 likes@Patrick Baklava It does.
5 likesexactly what the judge said. I dont think he was even going into the store. I am certain he just drives by just to check if someone was there just to go start sh*t.
69 likes@Patrick Baklava I did not say that.
3 likes@Max 404 He didn't need the handicap spot. Even if he did, the open parking spaces in front of the store are much closer than the handicap spots anyway. And if he thinks they're violating the law then he should call the cops. Parking illegally then approaching their car is the wrong thing to do, even if they were illegally parked in the handicap spot
37 likes@S He retired in his 30s. Maybe he had the right to use that handicap spot.
5 likesI am just saying, i think he wanted the spot.
This is a perfect example of mind your own business on the shooters side, and fuck around and find out on the victims side. They were both wrong. Had the victim not immediately resorted to physical assault (what if the guy was just asking directions, and just because he’s talking to your old lady you assault him) then he could have likely avoided being shit. And if the shooter had not made it his business to enforce parking at a fucking gas station the whole situation could have been avoided.
17 likes@Shotty except that somebody went in and announced that there was a loud altercation outside between a man and a woman.
15 likes@Melinda Mahoney we don't know details of the level of confrontation between the shooter and the lady. Either the victim assumed that the guy is threatening his wife or he could hear some threat from inside the shop... else why did he come and push that guy to the ground without even talking to the guy! I wish ppl just remain calm during any argument... anger blinds the mind... unnecessary loss of life when it could have ended with just a simple argument. This is the bad aspect of owning firearms...anger + easy access to a weapon is a dangerous combination
8 likesExactly. This is just male Karen levels 🙄
5 likesPp
0 likesHypocrisy more than irony 😂
2 likes@Max 404 there's a difference between retirement and simply not working anymore. And even if that's true there's not a single argument that could be used to justify his actions. None.
11 likes@Dj Pierce Well, that's what JCS said. A lot of arguments have been made in the court case. The case is not as clear as day.
1 like@Shotty If good people mind their own business, bad people win.
1 likeBut one has to be cautious, when confronting bad or stupid people.
Sometimes two idiots meet and things go downhill fast.
These type of people have a superior complex. They believe that they are better than others and have a right to tell people what they believe is right.
4 likes900
0 likesSo going back if the other person just push him that hard to the ground injury this one iam guessing we won't be here watching and writing about this.... than probably it's how always should be treated throwing someone to the ground that hard( like imagine when you get involved in something like that). The handicapped place is there not for selfish or lazy people use them. Perchance. Most certain he don't like black people and shouldn't NEVER shoot to kill....
0 likes@christian Michael Drejka started a commotion and ended up in jail.His behaviour was foolish.Now he has lost his freedom and is in a world of regret for his unneccessary,unwanted actions.
0 likes@Max 404 it’s not his job to enforce who uses the parking spot at the gas station bro, what are you on about
5 likes@Stonk Nooby Anyone can argue with anyone. It's not a crime.
1 like@Max 404 in the vid you can hear him describing the altercation and saying when the women in the car asked ïs it any of your business" the shooter responded acording to him with "no but if my handicapped mother would have droven up it would be" so im going to assume he was not planning to stand there himself
1 like@TerribleZebra Yes, that became clear during the trial.
0 likes@Shotty Drejka wasn't "talking" to her, he was yelling and swearing at her, to the point where other customers, both coming OUT of the store and going in ALL stopped to watch and listen (they testified to this at the trial). If he had been speaking in a calm, polite manner I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have paid the least bit of attention. And he didn't need to touch the car. He had her trapped by standing blocking the door and he was speaking in a threatening manner which is part of the reason why he was convicted, because he instigated the entire incident. He is NOT the parking lot police. It's not his property so he had no right to walk over and say ANYTHING. In doing so he became the aggressor.
6 likes@lavya p Several witnesses testified at trial that Drejka was very loud and threatening. 2 of them immediately told the store owner and who they (correctly) assumed to be the woman's husband, Marquis, what was happening outside. If Drejka was a friendly man commenting on what a nice day it was or something then he wouldn't have been shoved to the ground.
0 likes@Max 404 I 🤔🤔
0 likes@Max 404 We all get to choose what battles are worth fighting for, and in this case, he should've erred on the side of caution & safety. It was only a matter of time before this wannabe cop made a bad decision. He will learn all about fear & pain. He claims that he's never been in a fight, good luck with that in prison.
0 likesWe miss you jcs. Been rewatching old vids of yours, hope yt stops being stupid and let's u come back! You're my fav channel 💓
1686 likesReplies (39)
Completely agree 🤜🏼
12 likesWhy can’t they post?
11 likes@Kaylee Ayres notice the only videos up. It's YouTube being racial
35 likes@Adam 😂🤡
20 likes@Adam what?
31 likes@Blissey why are you upset I noticed a pattern?
4 likes@Adam not upset I'm just saying of youtube had a problem with it than why is it up on other channels
5 likesWhat happened?
4 likesIt’s not necessarily YT. According to a Reddit thread, JCS started pulling videos off their own Patreon over a year ago saying the hosting fees were too high. Meanwhile according to the Reddit posters, hosting fees were only a few hundred dollars and they had 40k subscribers each paying at least 1 USD a month. You do the math. Allegedly when people called them out on it they deleted messages and blocked users. This all seems very odd.
36 likes@Charlie Brown
42 likesHe took all that patreon money and ran, it's blatantly obvious.
Youtube isn't "giving him problems", he's just done with the channel but won't admit it.
Views started reaching like 80 million and he just bounced.
@Charlie Brown what are hosting fees? It’s seems just as stupid as the idiots being interrogated in these videos because for someone who can make a very good living off of literally narrating an already made video(interrogation) which doesn’t seem like it would be incredibly time consuming and back breaking to just decide to stop when clearly the potential for an outstanding amount of money to be made seeing as some of these videos are viewed in the tens of millions!!
5 likes@Melissa Coulter Hosting fees are what you pay to Patreon to keep your content on their platform. JCS isn’t just one person, it’s a group of people and the ex Patreon members seem to think they got greedy and couldn’t agree on how to split the money fairly, so they are at an impasse when it comes to continuing with their content.
11 likesThe narrator is just the narrator. Jcs was a team not a person lmao….
22 likes@Vito Torpedo I don’t blame him though, he owes us nothing and the content he has is good enough
13 likes@Scott Baker
24 likesOh I know.
I'm just pointing out that the "youtube bad" excuse given has basically been proven to be a load of shit.
@SquidPW check their community tab posts
2 likesThey just announced they're done, unfortunately 😔. Youtube has demonizing every video isn't to their benefit 😕
3 likesare their any other channels like this? I just got into true crime and all that
2 likes@christian this is monsters
2 likes@christian matt orchard 10000% look him up, best JCS like by far. Offers so much more than many of the copycats.
5 likesME TOO.....I would seriously cheer if JCS returned
1 like@christian yup, many more videos of his on the “J C S” channel, and even on here but they’re unlisted, just type in this yt channels name and you’ll find playlists full of more videos than the one shown on this channel
2 likes@christian I just recently found a channel "explore with us". It reminds me of this channel I think it's pretty good. You may or may not like it but worth checking out and of course there's "That Chapter" as well. Hope this helps you find something you enjoy
4 likesthank you everyone who recommended I'll check them all out. I'll be working an overnight shift next week while our usual overnight person goes on vacation. this will really help. really appreciate it!
2 likes@Kathleen J Yes I recently found Explore With Us and it is really great
2 likes@Kirk B T Yes his other channel is Kizzume
1 like@christian I am totally hooked on @swordandscale
0 likesDrejka did the right thing, he was attacked, end of story.
1 like@Lee Davies I don't know if he did the right thing, however, I believe under US law he should have been dismissed. I have seen far more unprovoked cases beat the wrap.
1 likeMr Ballen. He's not JCS like but he has great stories.
1 likeIts wack because some of the stuff some of these channels get to post and keep on and dont get in trouble is crazy
0 likes@Kainan Hupp what do u mean? Why got in trouble?
0 likesthe "JCS inspired" channels are blooming, and they are JUST as good : )
1 like@christian “Stranger stories” is another channel to check out 👌🏻
1 likeYes
0 likes@christian Red Tree Crime is pretty good imo
1 likeIs there any way to watch the videos that have been removed from YouTube, or are they just lost to the ether?
0 likes@Jarthen Greenmeadow mr ballen is super addicting, ive watched all his videos already in one months time, hes amazing.
0 likesThat is one thing we can all agree on. They were the BEST.
1 likeThe fact that this guy feels the need to say "negative" instead of "no" after every question, just shows how hard he's trying to sound smart
1442 likesReplies (23)
I wouldn't say he's trying to seem "smart". He's trying to sound like law enforcement or military and I'm sure you know what people say about "Military Intelligence" (it's an oxymoron). Basically he's trying to talk like a cop/military to build rapport.
106 likesI don't know if the guy ever served in the military but that's just how we talk over a radio for the purpose of clarity. Yes and no are both single syllable meaning a split second of RFI can prevent clear reception - so we use "Affirmative" and "Negative" instead. Over static it's easier to tell the difference.
Same reason we use a phonetic alphabet over the radio because the letters "A", "J", "K" all rhyme; letters "B", "C", "D", "E", "G", "P", "T", "V" and "Z" all rhyme and can be mistaken. Instead we use Alpha Charlie Delta Echo Golf Papa - each one sounds distinctly different and that matters when lives are at stake.
Call in the wrong grid coordinates to DIVARTY and you might hit the wrong sector & take out an entire platoon of Rangers. I literally heard exactly that... ALMOST happen one year while on a CAX at 29 Palms. We were in the middle of nowhere; hot as hell; bored as fuck and guarding something I couldn't even see for HOURS. Just making sure nobody passed us on that road and didn't even know why. Our only entertainment was the FM radio so when I heard these excited calls coming over the radio my ears perked up; I sat up in my seat.
@liquidbraino that’s really interesting and I did not know the latter part of that.
3 likes@Michael his choice of intervention was to assault him without warning. Mike is a scumbag for his reaction but it was a reaction. Always use your words first if nothing else but to have the excuse of “well I tried to talk it out with him first”
12 likesfrfr
0 likes@811chelseafc if someone is verbally assaulting my family I'm going to assault them with proper force and he's not just "a scumbag",he's a convicted murderer... As a grown man I've come to realize no one makes you have any reaction, your in control of that.
5 likes@Bossman Biden if you don’t see how that behavior can so easily lead to escalation I can’t help you.
8 likes@811chelseafc don't need your help chelse...
1 like@Bossman Biden my thing is this. If someone is verbally assaulting your family, they’re clearly unhinged. Why would you then escalate. You say no one is responsible for their reactions but themselves. Turning a verbal confrontation into a physical one is escalation at its finest.
10 likes@Bossman Biden I'm in control of my actions that's why I will escalate an incident with someone who could be capable of anything"
6 likesAlso "proper force", lmao the internet matcho man.
@liquidbraino If the point is temporal clarity, wouldn't it be better to not use two words that both end in -ive? lol. If you catch the tail end of affirmative or negative they sound the same. It strikes me that "yes yes" and "no no" might be better for that task
2 likes@Jek True. But you probably already know what they say about "military intelligence" (it's an oxymoron). Probably still better than saying "Yeah" and "Nah" because both are one single syllable. Personally if I'm listening to a call go out over the radio and all I heard was the last syllable the next thing I'm going to say over the radio is "10-9" or "Say again, you're coming in 10-1; no copy". If I heard them clearly I'm still going to confirm "10-4, I copy that's a NEGATIVE". Just to be clear - IF it's about something super important... like coffee.
6 likesHe’s a wannabe police officer. When the judge gave reason for his 20 year sentence not the home probation the defense attorneys were requesting was so on point.
3 likes@Michael And by intervene you mean physically push someone and escalate the situation? How did that turn out for Markeis? Jacobs was not in any immediate danger and was inside her car. Markeis could have simply walked into the car and both could have driven off without incident. Unfortunately, Markeis pushed a hot headed individual who took SYG literally, got shot and died. Although I'm not blaming Markeis or Jacobs for what occurred, all could have been avoided if they would have parked in a different spot as well.
4 likes@Bossman Biden someone is arguing with your wife and you immediately spring to violence? Well, that would make you a criminal. That’s assault, and regardless how blameless you want to make the victims actions, assaulting a man who’s having words with your wife is the behaviour of a thug, it’s not reasonable. This isn’t to say the victim deserved to die, but it could have been completely avoided if he didn’t immediately spring to assault.
3 likesNobody here seriously believes that was a reasonable reaction, but they are pretending it is, so that they can maintain the victim/oppressor narrative.
Positive
1 like@ Michael so true
0 likes@Michael to be fair, intervening is not just quickly closing the distance and assaulting. Regardless of the law, dude would still be alive had he kept his hands to himself
1 likeNothing to do with him trying to sound smart. He's trying to use cop/military talk, which negative falls into.
2 likes@Michael if a stranger is arguing with your wife over a parking space, has not threatened physical harm or acted upon it in any way (court documents and evidence show this was the case here, even in Jacobs' own testimony), you DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASSAULT THEM. Had McGlockton not been killed, he would have had assault charges at the very least. You have the right to verbally intervene with the man, but you cannot approach and attack him out of nowhere.
0 likes@Bossman Biden bruh you can’t even spell, why should anyone listen to what you have to say. Not to mention your username.
1 likeI think he’s more trying to sound/feel like he’s one of them, talk in the cop talk he’s heard on TV, give himself this air of professionalism, he was just doing his job, defending his gas station. And I think he wants very badly to feel like a cop
0 likesHow saying "negative" instead of "no" makes someone sounds smart?
0 likes@Sofian because he's trying to sound like a buddy to the cops. He also uses military lingo when he has never served. It's almost like he learned about those words that day and was going to use them to the fullest extent. Soooo negative sir, it's affirmative this guy is peepee poopoo
0 likesWhen you carry a firearm, you NEVER instigate a conflict. Any fight you participate in becomes a deadly encounter as soon as you pull a gun out. Your job is to avoid confrontations and deescalate as much as possible. Pulling a gun out is your last resort in the face of a threat to you, your family, or your property. If you’re no longer in danger, you no longer have a legal reason to use that firearm.
2735 likesThis guy was looking for a fight so he could live out his mall ninja fantasy and therefore did every single one of those things wrong.
Replies (82)
Unless you're a cop, then do it to anyone everyday.
75 likes@keegan johnson yea I wonder how you survived this long with those cops hunting you. It's nuts.
48 likes@jacksobrooks lmao. It is truly luck. I've had 3 family members murdered by the police. I wouldn't call it hunting, as much as I would say it's extorting at gun point.
82 likes@jacksobrooks 2 were shot one was beaten to death on Christmas.
49 likes@keegan johnson why
13 likesThis. People probably don't know, but in the same year this man threatened four other people with his gun over traffic/parking incidences and also caused a crash with a mother and two children with aggressive driving and break checking. He was waiting for this.
76 likes@Ethan CR agreed.. dude was looking for an excuse so he could feel powerful.
40 likes@jacksobrooks all three are long stories.
4 likes@keegan johnson I understand, but you did bring it up. I just don't think that every cop or even close to half of them are chomping at the bit to kill "anyone everyday" as you said.
25 likesVery thought out and intelligent comment.....
1 likeAgree with everything but the property part. Property is never more valuable than a life
25 likes@Spliffed to The Gallows Even if someone was in the process of burning your house down....?
6 likesYou have the best comment on this stream. You have common sense and a good sense of reality.
3 likes@keegan johnson Wow. Sorry that happened.
5 likesMaybe don't have a gun. There really is no justifiable reason to have one.
11 likesVery well said.
1 likeTBF, The boyfriend shouldn't have pushed him down, he should have slowly walked up and just asked what was going on what they were yelling. Instead he chose to attack Michael.
20 likesWell he was just arguing with the lady. Technically her man instigated the whole thing when he put his hands on the other man. However that doesn’t make it right to shoot the man. He was not in any imminent danger. Nobody won this one. Sad outcome.
19 likesPolitely informing somebody they are parked in the handicapped spot is a decent gesture and even a moral obligation towards the community. The thing is that almost nobody in the world (sadly) will admit to being wrong and correct their mistake, so you better be ready to go on with your life or even accept some hard words from such people (as seen in Cart Narcs). Normally the situation should have ended (even after Drejka was shoved to the ground) in the worst case for the couple, with a parking ticket and a few hard stares. Instead, Drejka's actions were led by anger and ego (since the first moment really) and causd the death of a person. Drejka is guilty but things are not black and white.
9 likesEdit: I watched a bit more of the video, I fully agreed with the prosecution, justified in pulling the gun, unjustified in pulling the trigger.
@jacksobrooks i can understand the viewpoint (but to clarify i dont really agree 100%, i just can see where he and others are coming from). some people in my family have had bad run-ins with cops, especially one who was beat up really badly by police while he was defenseless. and just recently we got screwed over by a cop who didnt want to do his job after my little brother got jumped in a bathroom and had his phone taken. but i personally havent had any bad encounters with cops knock on wood
2 likes@Mr.Krabbb i thought so to. He had time to think, as he saw the gunman and his wife was quarreling and approaching. An ordinary person would walk up and ask what's wrong first. One thing lead to another, and I'm sure had he talked, the firearm would less likely to be pull out.
1 like@DeeABLO2 exactly
0 likesPulling the gun is one thing, firing it is another. You can pull just be sure its for the right reasons. And no, a fist fight isnt a reason.
5 likes@ethan
2 likesRegardless of what you claim the law allows, you shouldn't be able to just shoot someone simply for being on your property. There should have to be other variables that actually present some danger to your physical well being before you go that far in self-defense. But I'm pretty sure if some kid is retrieving a ball from your lawn, you can't get away with gunning them down.
@The Great Pumpkin No there is definitely other features to it, you have to be put in danger or feel your life is being threatened. so no obv you can’t kill the kid getting his ball but if he pulls out a strap he gettin smoked
2 likes@ethan
0 likesTBF, your previous comment read: "if someone’s on your property in most states you’re allowed to shoot them." But you can't (or at least shouldn't legally be able to) shoot someone for just being on your property. And I was responding to that. But yes, there's more to it than just that. However, I think it could lead to a lot of gray area or slippery slopes. For example, there's a case where a drunk woman steals a literal Nazi flag from a Nazi's trailer, and he shoots at her multiple times and by some miracle doesn't kill her. People are actually justifying his reaction, tho.
@ethan yep
0 likes@Spliffed to The Gallows
5 likesIf we use history as a barometer then property is far more valuable than life. It doesn't mean it's a great lesson in morality, but it's true that most wars cost lives, and are fought over resources (property.) As proof I would argue that battles are named for real estate, for example it's "the Somme." History forgets the name of even a single one of the 1M combatants who died.
@Captain Price Freedom over safety if you want to be safe live in a cage
2 likes@keegan johnson there's more to the story than that
0 likesninjas don't use firearms
0 likes@keegan johnson And I am sure they were stopped while helping little old ladies across the street and then complied with every request the cop made.
2 likes@Rodney Smith you don't have to obey an unlawful order
2 likestell the cops , let them know this
1 like@keegan johnson lmao what a stupid statement 😂😂😂 but it made me laugh tho
1 like100% ✅
0 likes@Rodney Smith nah they were stopped and murdered for going 1 mph over the speed limit. They didn't do anything wrong, cops just let the rounds fly as soon as he stopped.
0 likesAbsolutely right. I might even take it a step further and say it's not even worth it to protect your property. In my area recently there was a guy who saw some thieves taking the catalytic converter off of his car. He approached them with his firearm telling them to stop, but they were armed as well and then a gunfight took place. Guy was killed over a catalytic converter, not worth it if you ask me. I'll only result to violence to protect myself or others, property can be replaced
0 likesKinda like Kyle Rittenhouse went in with a weapon to a hostile scene and instigated the shooting and claimed self defense.
1 like@BambooScar ah, so you didn't watch any of the trial, look at any of the facts for that case. Good job. Stay woke.
3 likes@savethequeen78 wake up, yes I did.
0 likes@BambooScar well you need to wake up and actually read the facts of the case before spouting off. You're not better than the cult of the woke members if not.
3 likesYou can’t shoot someone if they’re destroying your property. Prolly some 13yo kid who’s dad took a conceal deadly weapons class.
1 likeThis is an important statement. I watched recently a man shoot his girlfriends ex husband over her not letting the father see his kids. It was a argument in front of a house and the BF felt a gun was necessary even tho the father was unarmed and he shot the father bc the father approached him to, likely disarm him but he killed him and was never charged due to self defense. Had they just called the cops those kids would still have a dad and not a murderer for a step dad.
4 likesToo many cowboy movies, not enough common sense.
1 likeYeah, not like the dude pulled up his shorts the minute he exited the store, preparing himself for physical conflict. He pushed the guy, whatever happens next is on him. It's one thing arguing with another person, but if you physically assault someone and end up shot, thats your problem lmao.
0 likes@Carinae Psychotic worldview. Attemptying to justify somebody using lethal force against a person who is backing away is just next level. I'll add the lmao as well, just to make myself seem cooler. lmao.
4 likes@Mr.Krabbb you mean use his words…😱
0 likes@CEREAL KILLER But it doesn’t work that way..if you are justified in drawing your gun that means you are in fear of your life because that is the ONLY reason to draw your gun.
1 like@Bettyboop Rocks LOL fr
0 likesHe got assaulted plain and simple. Yea he shouldn’t have shot him, but when you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes. Both won stupid prizes.
2 likesExactly, never pull your weapon, unless you intend to use it. And you better be right. This guy was looking for an excuse to use his weapon. A real jerk.
2 likesI personally don't love guns and don't plan on ever owning one, but I love it when gun owners are responsible and understand what it means to carry a firearm
1 like@Ethan CR This comment needs to be higher up! So many people are calling him completely justified in the situation, not realizing that he is telling his story in a way that isn't entirely honest.
1 like@keegan johnson Long stories are usually full of embellishments. Sorry for your loss, but sounds like it's a bit of a trend in your family. Much more likely that you've got a shitty family than for 3 separate mistakes to be made to the same family. That's just basic statistics. I've had many encounters with police, survived them all just fine.
0 likesAgreed 100%
0 likesImagine a world, In a developed country, in 2022, where some people carry firearms, and need all this self defence BS.
1 like@jacksobrooks it doesn’t matter why. They were murdered
0 likes@jacksobrooks actually you hit the nail right on the head buddy 🙂 good work 🙄💀
1 likeSo true
0 likesMall ninja fantasy 😂😂😂😂😂
0 likes@jacksobrooks would you make the same statement about the blatant extortion and abuse of civilians rights that occur on a daily basis! I guarantee you it’s way over half who conduct business in this manner! Furthermore the other ones don’t say anything for a band of brothers mentality and which has plagued many ugly instances in our armed forces and police brutality! The system is very broken and almost designed for cops and civilians to not get a long. I have seen some good cops so let’s be clear but the bad far outweigh the good! If it wasn’t for peoples story’s on here that show how their rights were abused then I wouldn’t of learned. Saying you just don’t think its not happening is not listening to people who have gone through it. We can tell our stories but until people choose to believe it to fit their narrative because they don’t wanna believe it.
0 likes@jacksobrooks one thing I will agree with is people do act like it’s worse now more then ever and that’s cuz of body cams and we can see with our own two eyes and it enrages the people who have went through it. Makes them relive the bad moments we had with cops. It’s not worse but it’s being filmed is all. Now everyone can see!
0 likes@Seahawkblazing "bad moments we had with cops". What bad moment did you have with cops?
0 likes@Captain Price You saying this is so damn ironic I’m convinced you’re a bot
0 likesThis is a great argument for requiring gun owners to know what they are doing...
1 likeI agree 100% .
0 likes@keegan johnson can we get the names of those three family members? I’d like to investigate this.
0 likesThe other guy instigated the fight. Legally, Drejka was in the wrong. Morally, I give him a pass. Don’t assault people. Dumbass thought he could attack someone without consequences. Stupid games, stupid prizes.
0 likesif you've seen the CCTV and have heard testimony of McGlockton's girlfriend (Jacobs), this is a more complex case than you make it out to be. It's true that Drejka is an idiot, wanna-be cop who murdered someone in the second degree as they were retreating from him. But it's also true that you are still allowed to initiate a disagreement with someone regardless of whether you're carrying. Such a verbal confrontation in and of itself is not a crime. You are not permitted to attack someone who is arguing with your girlfriend, even if it's over something petty or you feel he's in the wrong. Jacobs never testified that Drejka physically threatened her or acted in any way that would make a reasonable person feel as though her life or that of another was in danger. Additionally, she was in the driver seat of a vehicle, with the key, and she even opened her door and exited beside Drejka as McGlockton approached from the side. These aren't actions a person who fears for her life and the lives of her kids takes. On the contrary, it was she who threatened earlier to "get her man", which although not constituting all that imminent a threat by itself, clearly and reasonably can be thought of as a threat of harm in some regard. Both men made poor choices. And when you say "pulling a gun out is your last resort in the face of a threat to you", I agree. I would consider being tackled to the ground one of those instances. Firing upon someone who then retreats is of course another thing entirely.
1 likeWas he the one that started the physical altercation? No, that was the black
0 likesGreat system. Now, as long as everyone is disciplined and mature then the “everyone has a gun” world works. Sadly that isn’t reality, so you’ll have never ending tragedy, forever.
0 likesHaving a conversation in a parking lot is NOT "instigating" nor is it illegal. Getting pushed off your feet is definitely illegal and justified Drejka's heroic act. Bet them thugs in that neighborhood thinkin' twice before layin hands.
0 likes@rain tree I'm pretty sure if you killed someone for burning down your house you would go to jail.
0 likes100% correct. Very well said.
0 likes@keegan johnson Of course they were :-).
0 likesKinda like in Super when he beats the shit out of a guy with a plumbing wrench for cutting in line.
0 likes@Spliffed to The Gallows a humans rights are also important. The right to own and protect property. I don't care about your pathetic life if your trying to break in my house. I don't care if your homeless. I don't care if your starving. If you break in, I'm feeding you lead.
1 like@Captain Price oh no reason except to protect you and your family. Your property. Imagine captain price with no gun lmao
0 likes@Dangerous Dru it's almost like people think that it's not the criminals fault that they break into your house. Like they can't control it, you won't get shot if you stay out of my stuff! Easy, I avoid getting shot by doing this everyday. Here, a little guide, step 1) notice other persons stuff, step 2) leave other persons stuff alone, step 3) no shooting occurs. Look how nice I am, I didn't even ask for money for that!
1 likeAlso, the guy saying that 3 family members just so happened to get killed by cops while totally, no seriously, take my word for it, were not doing anything illegal, I am above and beyond skeptical that they weren't doing quite a lot wrong.
@Spades 75 yes dude a hundred percent! Then people ask what they did and all he says is "long story." If they were shot for no reason that's a pretty short story lmao.
0 likes@Dangerous Dru I was a Paralegal for eight years. I've heard a lot of "long stories". Usually it's people breaking the law and honestly just getting upset that they were held to task. There are bad cops out there, sure, same as there are bad plumbers and bad office workers, but it's hardly the majority.
0 likesSo, handicap spot or not, does anybody else think that a random man pulling up and immediately circling around a woman in her car with her kids might come across as a little creepy?
427 likesReplies (28)
Very much so.
20 likes@Roger The Shrubber Id be scared with my babies. People are crazy
32 likesIt doesn't matter if it comes to you as creepy. He was indeed looking for a plate, which is something normal if you are concerned about people missusing the handicap spot.
4 likes@Publio Virgilio The handicapped spot was not legal. The town did not approve of it. Drejka was parked illegally and shot another man because he thought he had a right. It was not normal for any rational human being.
33 likes@Looking 4 Things it also doesn't matter if the spot was legal or not, the thing is that the family parked in that spot, they wouldn't know it wasn't legal, they did wrong. The black man was stupid for pushing someone from a blindspot, and of course the shooter did absolutely wrong for shooting him to death, but it is true that he could have feared for his life. There is no need to divide people in good and bad, they were all wrong.
5 likes@Publio Virgilio Yes it does, at least if you have some sense of self-preservation when confronting strangers and managing the sort of reaction you elicit from them. Or at least understand the responsibility that you have as a gun owner to avoid escalating to lethal force.
16 likesHe could also have spoken to a store clerk or called the police.
@Publio Virgilio It very much does matter how Drejka's actions were interpreted, which is why several witnesses were called at trial to testify as to what they saw and heard between Drejka and Marquis' wife, and they all said he was loud and threatening. They even made mention of the confrontation when they went into the store to the owner which alerted Marquis as to what was happening.
10 likes@Porky I'm not saying that drejka did right, he is a murderer and he payed for his crime. But that fact doesn't delete the bad decisions the family made. They didn't care about an eventual handicapped persona and the man chose instant violence instead of speaking or calling the police like you said.
5 likes@Herbert West I'm split a little in this case. Both men made very bad choices. Drejka should have at most tapped on her window and said it's a restricted spot, chose more productive words for a reminder that its selfish behavior exploiting the handicaps of others. Perhaps tell the clerk about it if she's nasty in response or refuses to move. McGlockton should have de-escalated the situation and refrained from brazenly assaulting someone over a verbal argument. Drejka never made any specific threats of harm-- yes, he acted aggressively and inappropriately, and he's an idiot wanna-be cop. But why would a woman who felt like her life and kid's lives were potentially in danger, when she's the driver of the vehicle she's sitting in, open her door and get out beside Drejka? I never heard any evidence that he spoke words or took action that constituted an immediate threat to her or anyone else. I've had crazies and assholes approach me in public and get my heart racing, and guess what? Regardless or whether or not I'm armed, I de-escalate with words or leave the area if it only gets worse. I feel that by unconditionally supporting McGlockton because of Drejka's mistakes, you send those who listen and agree with you a message that it's ok to attack people in public if they're arguing with you or a loved one, and that the best course of action is to escalate situations like this. It's toxic behavior that gets people seriously hurt and killed. And even if the other party was in the wrong, does it matter when you're dead? Black leaders especially need to be sending this message to their communities, but instead seem to send the opposite: that you can do to people whatever you want if they start an argument with you. That culture of taking these situations into your own hands is causing generational trauma, harm, increasing violence and death. But I suppose we'll keep pointing the finger elsewhere...
4 likes@Publio Virgilio In my opinion there were much better ways to handle that concern than him encircling the car and escalating things himself from there. I think that at a certain point things should've been left to actual law enforcement, not some random guy wanting to play cop. At least if it's actual law enforcement inspecting my car and getting awfully close to my kids, I'd know what the intentions are.
4 likesI think that this guy wanted to take out some of his frustrations on his own by initiating this conflict. Maybe he didn't go in with the intent to kill, but he certainly had the intent to start an altercation of some kind.
End of the day, what a petty reason for anyone to die. A parking space.
@TRGB yeah bro. That's the thing
0 likesIn fairness i do let people know about their bad driving or parking but i keep my distance and typically start with do you need medical assistance? Then why the F are you driving/ parking like that. That being said i try very hard to not approach someone in a car as i know when folks rush my window i have pepper spray and other ready to engage the conflict.
1 likeYes. And his car was parked closer to the station so it's not like he was even affected at all by it.
1 like@Looking 4 Things doesn't matter if was illegal. There was no need to go policing the place
3 likes@Publio Virgilio "Something normal" like arguing with a woman seconds before you murder her boyfriend. Yknow, normal stuff.
3 likesIt’s not any less creepy than a random woman pulling up and immediately circling around a man in his car with his kids. Stop creep exaggerating. The kids weren’t even in the car with her, they went into the store with the father.
2 likesHe didn’t even circle the car you prude, he very obviously was trying to look at the plates.
1 like@Aaron King Timestamps for any of these claims? Also do you even know what the word "prude" means? Why do you sound so fatherless and mad Aaron? Got some problems irl? Got something you wanna share with us?
2 likes@_ haha no.
0 likesSo was anyone handicapped in the vehicle? Or what was the reason they parked there in the first place?
0 likes@happyfacefries I agree. Drejka was a jerk and he is right where he should be.
1 like@Maryland marijuana review I'll never park near you.
1 like@Looking 4 Things its about respecting and acknowledging that there are other drivers on the road. Theres no reason anyones driving should effect anyone elses journey if we all did what we were supposed to do. Thank god my grandmother doesnt drive but she can barely walk and the distance in that video would have taken her 30 mins to do on her own and thats with a good spot.
0 likes@Maryland marijuana review Funny I dont consider your comment stream to be very respectful to others. Just saying.
1 like@Looking 4 Things lol i dont care about others but also dont want to get ripped out of my ride and beat to death. This does happen every day and im not just talking about hurt feelings.
0 likes@Maryland marijuana review Ok. Well have a nice day.
2 likes@Publio Virgilio while he parked illegally himself..like I'm sorry he wasn't even handicap himself so why is he even looking for it..
0 likesHe's actually threatened a woman and her kids with a gun for...driving too slowly in a 15mph school zone.
1 likeMan is a habitual road rager who thought his gun made him king of the road.
This man was involved in 4 prior road rage incidents where he threatened drivers with a gun. He was looking for a reason to finally pull the trigger.
109 likesIt’s amazing how quickly his “soreness” went away while he was alone and then returned when the officers returned.
638 likesReplies (6)
you noticed that too huh
16 likesThe very first thing I noticed too
10 likesHe made a sling for his arm and shit🤣🤣
21 likesIt was ridiculous for him to even say he was hurt and insane for him to act like he did after having literally just having shot someone in the chest with a gun!!
11 likesMe too!
0 likesdefinitely
0 likesIf I had my kids and wife in the car, and some creep started walking around staring at my car I would be on full alarm too. The dad walking out not knowing what was going on, I’m sure he was also on full alarm. All of this is due to this guys ego, and his over inflated sense of justice.
126 likesReplies (4)
Drejka didn't confront the woman calmly either. Several people that pulled up to the store and got out of their cars as the confrontation was happening actually made comments to the store owner and Marquis about how loud and aggressive Drejka was. They testified to this at the trial. It was a very heated exchange. Marquis was defending his family like any man would do.
18 likesAlso they mentioned Dreka had a history of pulling out a weapon on 4 unarmed people (2 men, 2 women) in the past. His firearm should’ve been stripped from him a long time ago
11 likes@Herbert West I really don't think just shoving a man like that is good or defending your family. Maybe if he was actually threatening or it seemed like he was already about to get in, then yeah. If what the father did was shitty, then what Drejka did was pure evil. Again, shoving a man like that is a shitty move, unless the man was punching the car already, and I'm not justifying what Drejka did at all.
4 likes@Sittie Nakan if some guy is harassing a man's family I think a push would not be a over reaction with how stuff like this usually plays out a fight would breakout I feel as if we as Americans have belief of our right to fuck people up or just kill them for minors things which i
3 likeswhy situations like this are so common here all the guns floating around just makes things that would usually end in a beating more deadly then they would in other countries just reading some of the comments here believing this man desreved to die over a push just soldifys my belief
Crazy you haven't even been at it for a year and you're outclassing most content creators I can think of. Keep up the good work, Jim!
2477 likesReplies (32)
That's because this. Channel is made up of a few other content creators. It's not just one person. Love it all the same.
39 likesPotent Beauty good work from all of them
9 likesJim is daddy
8 likesOh hes at it... for 1 dollar a month you can have over 30 JCS videos you haven't seen that are usually an hour long and involve way more disturbing content ;) SERIOUSLY worth it for a measly $1 a month...
36 likes$10 is almost a year, treat yourself. Life too short and you been doing work recently IRL ( i feel )
4 likesMy 1 dollar is being spent well on his patreon. Such good content
13 likes@Anti - Ethnic Cleansing It is because I'm supporting my favourite youtuber who's content has flourished on Patreon due to our support. Don't hate, Be happy.
5 likes@Turtle NFTS 🐢 yes and I'm glad the team is making some serious cash cause patreon. I've been with em since day one and will be till the last day!
3 likesJim is amazing, isn't he??
2 likesIf you're not already subbed on Patreon, and can afford it, I'd highly recommend that too, some great videos on there that aren't on here.
2 likesYour absolutely correct. He’s been doing it since day one is the crazy part!
1 likeCantStopCor The Goat
3 likesYeah, he's banking off of Patreon. I'm happy to be a dollar of the $18,000+ he's making every month 😂
Potent Beauty That’s not correct. It’s all Jim.
1 likeBradley H That’s incorrect information. This is all Jim.
1 likeCrypticRaps wow that’s so much money a year! 😳🤯
1 likeI'm a big fan of this channel as well. Every video so far has been quality. 👍
2 likesThis🖤
2 likesDad TV Time
0 likeslol no doubt. And that's just $1,800 something if everyone pledged a dollar. Not taking into account all the ten dollar pledgers.
And yeah, I think Jim puts everything together, then has Kizzume do the reading.
He's been at it. Check his Patreon
0 likesHear, hear
0 likes@what stars really look like good ol haters
0 likesAnd please learn to swim
0 likes1,000th like. 😀
0 likesAt this point they need to create their own independent website were you can subscribe for their content. I will not give any money to patreon and would enjoy watching more of their content than what they offer on youtube. Also, what's with the pizza slice and the name latenight lowlife? A lot of people know what pizza means these days. Hopefully you're not involved in that or you will get what's coming to you.
0 likes@Cryptic Raps it's even more now
0 likesThis aged like cheese... I'm sorry @JCS that YT fucked you up :(
1 likeThis aged terribly
0 likes@Cespu_IV
0 likesWhy? What happened?
@Gregor Samsa He stopped doing videos man
0 likeshe stopped because youtube started demonetizing his videos. they did it to the newer channels as well. YT ruined it....
0 likesAnd for good reason. I can't stand most other channels in general and their failed cringe attempts at comedy every other sentence. It's like they r so excited narrating that they think they can become comedians or something. 🙄
0 likes@TahitianTreat SkeetJuice why they demonizing for?
0 likesHearing drejka say he "neutralized" a man who was clearly backing up made me really mad.
88 likesReplies (1)
FORCE MULTIPLIER
0 likesImagine a cop tells you that somebody has died because of you, and your response is "thank you for telling me that" instead of "im so sorry to hear that". Really shows how egocentric he is
9 likesReplies (1)
I think most reasonable people would have lost their mind if they found out they killed a man over an unused parking spot in front of his The level of grief would be too much to bare to continue with the interview.
1 likePeople freak out about handicapped parking. I lost a leg several years ago and often wear a prosthetic. Now and then I will use handicapped parking and even with the Florida tag endorsement I've been verbally attacked for parking in a spot designated for me to park at because I don't look handicapped enough. Folks need to learn to let police handle police matters.
28 likesReplies (1)
This is absolutely absurd to hear, the nerve of some people
1 likeSo sad that he cried over missing his dogs, but he had no reaction when he was told that he took the life of another human being. Lord, what kind of world has this become?
334 likesReplies (18)
maybe his dog not PUSH him first.
10 likes@舜帝 …
6 likesBut your above it all aren't you. Never mind that most of the things that you own were built in sweatshops by children.
0 likesnot just took a life but took a father away from his kids. I've seen some terrible things on this channel. obviously the guy that killed his family and the Casey Anthony case. but this one is infuriating for a whole other reason that being I cant believe how stupid it is. he killed someone over a parking spot. this is so bad I'm actually going to spell it out instead of using the the acronym: SHAKING MY DAMN HEAD
14 likes@christian No, he killed someone because he was attacked. He got into an argument with the WIFE over a parking spot.
2 likesI know. That guy Mike Dunn who shot the teen at another store, cried about his dog while on the stand. Not one tear for the teen. Crazy people
13 likesA dog loving world😍
1 likeexactly my thoughts.
2 likes@Ce'Anna Kae Smh 🤦🏾♀️
0 likes@Muskoka Mike He killed someone after getting shoved. I got fucking sucker punched in the gut in highschool, I dont think I had the RIGHT to shoot the guy, and I still dont think so to this day.
7 likes@Overly Aggressive Machine "I don't think" ...you could have stopped there.
0 likesYou DO have the right to defend yourself and if you believed it wasn't over you DO have the right to shoot the attacker.
Obviously you don't know your rights, which is a shame.
@Muskoka Mike so did u not watch the video and pay attention? he went to jail because the evidence was clear that he did not need to take someones life. at MOST all he needed to do was pull out his gun and scare the other guy off.
4 likes@sam grant I did watch the video and many people are arrested who haven't committed a crime. He was convicted due to his mindset of almost going out to look for something like this to happen.
0 likesIn many other places, he wouldn't even be arrested in the first place. "stand your ground" laws and all.
If you think a person isn't supposed to defend themselves when attacked, you should come up to Canada. Here if someone is breaking into our house and we stop them we get arrested too. If someone attacks us on the street and we defend ourselves, the same: we get arrested.
The point you all are missing is: you don't turn a verbal argument into a physical one because you never know if the other person is going to pull out a gun and defend themselves.
@Muskoka Mike He did have the right to defend himself, but if he chose to respond with deadly force then there would be a burden of proof he must meet that he genuinely felt his life was in danger.
3 likesNot to mention he said he didn't need or want to change the scenario....
1 like@舜帝 I can’t tell if your joking
0 likesWhat does his personal reaction have to do with the rest of the world?
0 likes@Brandon Massey It’s obvious that is his personal reaction. My point is that it is sad for anyone in this world to react that way.
1 likeThere was no chance he was going to ask to talk to a lawyer. This guy saw himself a cop basically, he was very happy to talk to the police and tell them what a good job he did. He probably thought they'd all take him out for a beer afterwards, and tell him that he could be fully in charge of that store parking lot from now on.
3102 likesReplies (70)
Lol probably thought his ass was going to get a job that day too 💀
195 likesThis. Exactly
44 likesI think he did wrong to protect himself. He should have asked for a lawyer first.
10 likesFunny lol
1 likeit's almost like the police actually do their job...
4 likes@Diamond Cooper I agree with active self protection. but in fairness he initiated the entire thing. if I go around starting shit with people and kill them as the become aggressive is that ok?
41 likes@CyberWolf
0 likesCanis Lupus
Howl baby..🌙 Long and Loud...
He did wrong by shooting him and especially shooting him in the body, but the other dude started being aggressive first. One thing is having a verbal argument, and the other one is using force.
7 likes@Fox Right. Like you wouldn't confront a man being aggressive with your woman. The shooter was being aggressive first with the victim's woman, so much so that people in the store could hear the altercation.
28 likes@William Graham has it been said that it was him who started being aggressive or you're just making this up? All I've heard that there were 2 people arguing. And anyway, he didn't touch her once, but her man comes out and starts being a macho by pushing him on the ground. Not that simple.
4 likes@Fox Dude, did you watch the video? Fact:
31 likesHe lied about his interactions with the victim. Fact: He has a history of pulling his gun on people. Four people to be exact including women. Fact: He walked around the car and rightfully the woman rolled down her window to ask him what he was doing. He approached her car when he had no right to do so. He went there with a confrontation in mind. That in itself is aggressive. Are we supposed to believe that a man who goes around pulling his gun on people was not aggressive 🙄
@William Graham You don't know what he was thinking when he pulled the gun out on this dude. You don't know what happened when he pulled his gun out before. He had full rights to approach someone's car, he didn't come that close nor did he touch it. He went there to tell her to park her car on the other spot, we still don't know who started the confrontation first. Even if he was aggressive, he didn't use any force first. All the people close to him say he was always calm and no one even knew he had a gun in the first place. I don't know what you see, but I surely don't see a psycho who wants to kill someone. Just a basic man who has a gun for self defense.
3 likes@Fox You dont need to write all that. Just think to yourself for a moment: Should I kill a guy because he took a step towards me? Did i really think he was about to kill me or was I just overreacting? I think overreacting. Case closed.
31 likes😂😂😂😂
2 likes@Violet Wade Exactly right.
1 like@cj Hall Be that as it may, what is wrong with it is knowing the encounter could end up in an aggressive confrontation and you being ok with that because you know you're packing. He confronted the driver with the knowledge that if things didn't go the way he wanted he could simply pull out his gun and shut them up. As he had done four times previously. It's clear it was only a matter of time before he killed someone.
22 likesAnd you have no right to confront anyone about parking in a handicap section unless you're in law enforcement.
@Violet Wade He threw him on the ground. Maybe he was overreacting, but everyone in the comments says that he's that pure evil who just wants to kill people, or that he's weak and wants to pour his anger on even weaker ones, and I think that's not the case. I don't see that amount of hate on videos of real murderers.
2 likes@William Graham Maybe stop pretending that there is only black and white and acknowledge that both did wrong?
2 likes@Fox See that's where you lost everyone. You dont shoot someone because they made you mad. Period. The fact that he shot a man shows that he's 1) Not fit to carry a weapon, 2) Not good at deescalating a situation, 3) YES overreacting. If he really thought the dude was going to kill him, then he was blowing the whole thing outta proportion. He had SO MANY OTHER OPTIONS to avoid further commotion. But he chose to pull out a gun and kill him. That makes you a murderer if you cant find any other way out of a pretty innocuous situation but to shoot and kill. This should be simpler than youre making it. Maybe u just want to justify the shooting cuz youre scared it'll become a racial thing? Whatever it is, stop over thinking it. The shooter belongs in an institution.
21 likes@Violet Wade ''the fact that he shot a man shows that he's 1) Not fit to carry a weapon'' so you carry guns for..?
0 likes@Brian Peters bruh
0 likes@Fox Um no. The white guy was swearing his head off. You can see that from his head rocking back and forth.
5 likes@Timberland Protection. Drejka did not need that kind of protection. He was overreacting and should have weighed his options. Dumb move.
9 likes@William Graham to say someone has to right to approach someones car is asinine and stupid. Solely because of that i think your argument is crap. Dude shouldnt be harassing people over handicap placards and he was a shit pile...but sneaking up on someone and shoving them to the ground like that would put some fear in you...he shouldn't have shot. If he was really in fear flashing it could've been enough but you are right...he wanted to kill him.
2 likesThing is these things do nothing but divide and make everyone hate each other. There is no way forward because that hatred is important to some.
@Fox the hate you see is racism my friend. It is blatantly pushed and rewarded. I'm not talking the shit they claim is the problem either....
2 likes@Fox they both did wrong, but one did significantly more wrong than the other. What next? Are you going to say jay walkers are just as bad as drunk drivers? Do you have no sense of scale?
3 likes@Violet Wade how can you state blatantly false information to make ones case look better? Saying the guy only took a step towards the shooter is just false. He violently pushed him down. They're not saying shooting him was the right call. They're just saying your argument is dogshit, and it is.
2 likes@pearswah except I fucking don't
0 likes@Violet Wade Exactly what I'm talking about. You don't take anything into the consideration. You see that someone shot someone and are fully convinced that he's a criminal or even a psycho, and the fact that he wasn't the one to start this is non-existent.
1 like@Frogstarr How come you don't work as a police officer yet if you can figure out what was everyone saying from a low quality video without sound showing only one person's back?
1 like@Zach Johnson Telling someone not to park on a handicap place is being a shit person? He wanted to kill someone so much that he initiated an argument just to justify himself after, even though he was characterized as a calm person? I don't even want to continue this discussion.
1 like@Fox logic.
0 likes@Frogstarr Logic what? You would have been hired if you had it at such level.
1 like@William Graham sticks and stones... but still that guy didn't continue being physically aggressive, so he was not in imminent danger. At that point if he would have called the cops he would have been in the right. Most likely would have even gotten compensation, if he sued the man.
2 likes@Mental Popcorn tf are you tryna say? Simplify your argument because it sounds to me you're just reiterating stuff I already talked about.
2 likes@Fox You keep harping on this crazy lunatic being a calm person. What are you basing this on? The guy has a history of pulling guns on people, even women, but yet here you are claiming insistently that he's a calm level headed person who's just misunderstood?
7 likes@Timberland People carry guns for all sorts of reasons. The predominant one being for protection. Some I believe carry guns because they relish the idea of having power or intimidating anyone who gets in their way or doesn't immediately do as they please.
2 likes@Zach Johnson Racism? Where? I'm white. Does calling out this trash of a human being for killing another make me a racist against my own kind?
1 like@Fox I find your defence of this murderer very strange.
3 likesThis murderer lied and tried to claim that the victim took a step towards him and so he fired his gun in fear for his life. The video evidence proves otherwise.
The clown then sat and blabbered to the investigators who he thought were his friends and would side with his brand of justice. They were able to get a true account of what happened out of his own clown mouth.
He deliberately approached that car knowing it might end in a confrontation. He didn't care because he had a gun on him, which he planned to use to solve any confrontation that might crop up. That's what gave him confidence as it had in the past.
In fact he didn't pull the trigger because he feared for his life, but because he feared a beating. He feared that he was going to be kicked and beaten, so he pulled out his gun and killed another human being.
And despite your repeated claims that he was calm during the initial confrontation, there was enough of an argument that people in the store heard and the woman's husband came out. Also a calm person would not have a history of pulling a gun on different people on multiple occasions.
A calm person would not have shot and murdered another person in this situation.
And finally the court judged him to be a murderer. End of story. Case closed
@William Graham I'm basing this on a fact that this has been said in the video. You don't know what happened when he pulled out his gun.
1 like@William Graham you don't know what was he thinking at the moment. You don't know what was going on in his head afterwards. You don't know with what intent he approached the car. You don't know he "planned to use a gun". I don't know what a saint are you if you won't use a gun even when you're being beaten. What's the point of having one then? Also, I never said that he was calm during the confrontation. I said that people who know him said he was generally a calm person. I don't know who started screaming and won't pretend that I know everything like you do. And as I said, you don't know what situation he pulled the gun out in. Ant the last part is just exactly my point: you accuse him of being a psycho-murderer with pure evil flowing through his veins just because the court said he did it intentionally. Same court released a person who murdered her own child, would you defend her then? I'm so tired of this argument.
1 like@Fox What are you on about? We do know what happened when he pulled out his gun. We saw the video. The victim AND another were turning away from him, not taking a step toward him when he fired his gun.
3 likes@Fox Um...I do know what he was thinking before and after. The guy told the investigators. Are you saying he was lying or did you simply skip the parts in the video where he said he feared a kick and beating?
9 likesActually no, I don't need to pull out a gun to feel big and strong. I don't own a gun and even if I did I would not be pulling and pointing it at people, because I feared being beaten up.
People might know him as calm, but his record says otherwise. He's pulled his gun on multiple people including women. A calm person would not do that. You can justify one incident of pulling a gun on someone, but 5 times? Where the fifth time ended with murdering another human being?
I'm seriously starting to wonder if you really watched the video. I'm not saying he's a psycho-murderer simply because the court said so. I watched him murder a person, try to cover it up by lying and the investigators got the truth out of him.
@William Graham whatever
0 likes@Fox LMAO imma go ahead and rub it in cuz I dont even need to say more, you lost that one chief. That was satisfying. Bravo William
4 likes@Violet Wade whatever.
2 likes@cj Hall confronting someone over handicap parking is stupid unless that person is intentionally preventing you from parking there when you have a legitimate need. Even then, you don’t know that they’re not allowed to park there. Maybe you can’t see the placard or the disability. My placard fell off the mirror a few times and I was ticketed, and I had to go and deal with enforcement and show I had the legal right to be there. You could watch me walk from the vehicle to the building and not realize I have a legit disability, but I do. I don’t think that’s the case here but none of this is anyone’s business unless they’re parking enforcement officers (or whatever that role is) or they are harassing a person with a disability. If Drejka or you or anyone else came up and acted like this I might tell you to F off because I don’t have to answer your questions. Or I might lol and say the placard falls down but it’s current, enjoy your day. Depends on my mood and the way I’m approached. But you don’t know someone is a shit person based on what you can’t see, and that’s what is wrong with just getting up in someone’s face over a handicap parking spot.
1 like@Sarah Nikas the only thing that is very clear is that he was attempting to enforce a law and in doing so he created a situation that resulted in a death.
0 likes@Fox reading on, I’m glad everyone else seems to see sense here. You are clearly trying to justify this man’s actions (and trying weirdly hard to do so) for whatever reason. Thank god the rest of us aren’t as fucking stupid
0 likes@Fox Tbh I couldn’t care less what you find funny because the rest of us are laughing at you
0 likes@Fox I’m gonna go out on a limb and say you’re definitely a seppo
0 likes@Georgia Baie Anderson goof for you.
0 likes@Zach Johnson 1st the issue with your argument is the man is not a police officer nor an employee of said store . He has no right to approach a vehicle for any reasons other than to see if the driver is in need of assistance. 2nd he had 4 cases of pulling his weapon out on people . 3rd if you walk out the store and see some random man yelling and cussing your significant other around your children , any man would immediately go into offense . He was the aggressor, and now he's in jail getting a train ran on him 🤷
0 likesI needed that !
0 likes@Fox I have a question. Beyond the "objective lens" or devil's advocate approach, what is your personal opinion on the matter? Obviously he killed someone which we all agree was horrible but your stance seems to be that unlike what the video stages, the man was a mostly normal citizen that was thrust into a situation in which he made a bad call. Do you mind exploring how you feel about it? I'm not here to ridicule or point fingers
0 likes@Noah Martinez I feel bad about any form of violence and in this situation it seemed to me like a victim was an initiator of violence. I think every conflict can be dealt with with words and people who can't do that are responsible for their actions, and this includes death. I can't imagine pushing someone when there's no threat, but I can totally imagine getting pushed or kicked because someone is just getting agressive towards me, so it's easier for me to understand what might have been happening in the mind of the attacker then what was happening in the mind of an initiator. Once again, I might be wrong, which I already said a couple of times. But I feel like given the story I heard in the video, I might also not be, but nobody wants to acknowledge this. Is that what you wanted to know?
2 likes@Fox Yup that's all I wanted, thank you for allowing me to see your point and sorry for everyone piling on you. Especially in cases like this it's easy to become blindsided by rage at the occurrence and hard to see someone else's perspective. There's a lot of truth to your words from my own perspective and these details are important. Have a good day
2 likes@Noah Martinez thank you for a good conversation. Sometimes it almost seems like people can only yell at each other and nice people get lost from the view. Sorry if it seemed that I was justifying killing someone, most of the time misunderstanding is the main problem in the argument.
2 likes@Fox Of course, and it's even worse when everyone dog piles without even reading the whole thread. Between 10-15 people just disregarded everything you said and questioned your pursuit for logic and frankly it was irritating. In a perfect world we wouldn't all be trying to cede power from one another and instead seek to understand and uplift one another but until then all we can do is try.
0 likes@Fox it was the right thing to be aggressive because his daughter and partner were in the car and a random dude is shouting at them! Natural instinct to protect your family
0 likes@Jayda J I don't think instincts apply to civil people. The instinct to rape someone is natural, too, but rape is bad and no one supports it, so no one should support aggression either.
0 likesExactly this
0 likes@Fox You already lost this argument to everyone on this thread when you replied "Whatever" to a logical argument.
0 likes@tmas the thing is, I didn't find it logical. By the time I already explained my position, and it was either ignored or not understood by the commenter. I'm over this argument, I explained myself, do what you want with this.
0 likes@Fox How it was illogical? Just did state facts you can hear in the video. Simple as that.
0 likes@tmas I already answered this, please read a thread.
0 likes@Fox I did read the whole thread. You didn't answer to that question. You only said "Whatever".
0 likes@tmas if you did read it whole, then you didn't really read into it. I thought my position was crystal clear, especially after my last conversation. I only stated that given his record, lack of information and the fact that he was attacked first, it's irresponsible to draw a conclusion that he is a cold-blooded murderer. I know it's easy to do so, but I literally said "it's not that simple" and people were triggered that I could even question their verdicts that were based on one video. They call me a defender of a murderer, even though my first comment read "what he did was wrong". That about sums it up, please, don't ask me anymore questions I already answered.
0 likes@Fox did you see the footage? he stared at the dude BACKING UP for MULTIPLE SECONDS
0 likesI think Drejka thought he was one of the guys and they thought as he did.
0 likes“Neutralize the immediate threat.” Dude is living in an action movie and he’s the main character.
84 likesReplies (1)
FORCE MULTIPLIER
0 likescrazy how his arm worked perfectly fine when he was alone, but as soon as the cops walk in it’s “owiee my poor arm i can’t even lift it 🥺🥺 shake my left hand instead 🥺🥺” absolutely pathetic
129 likesConclusion: On December 14, 2018, Judge Joseph Bulone set the trial of Michael Drejka to begin on August 19, 2019. Drejka was no longer using a "Stand Your Ground" defense. On August 23, Drejka was found guilty of manslaughter with the use of a firearm. On October 10, 2019, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit of 92 days for time served (he had faced up to 30 years in prison). McGlockton's family asked for the maximum, while the defense asked for house arrest and probation. The judge spared Drejka from the maximum sentence due to his cooperation with the police and his lack of prior convictions, but said that he was a wannabe cop and tough guy who tried to self-appoint himself as a handicapped parking space monitor.
668 likesHe is imprisoned at Lancaster Correctional Institution, near Trenton, Florida, where he was attacked and reportedly wounded by another inmate on February 11, 2020. In December 2021, a three-judge panel of the Florida Second District Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and the sentencing.
Replies (38)
Thank you for the update!
59 likesThanks! What about the lady? Does she still park in handicapped spaces?
59 likes@Squiggly Line Only when there are plenty of other available parking spaces to minimize the impact of her actions, from what I've heard.
51 likes@Metal Gamer Yes yes, I'm sure she's given careful consideration to all handicapped before parking in their spaces, weighing each scenario carefully before finalizing the park...........
22 likes@Squiggly Line she should
1 like@Metal Gamer Yet she fails to consider the plentiful parking spaces for herself to park instead of taking up the handicapped space..
13 likes@Johnny Natrium have you honestly ever seen a handicap person get out of a car and go “gosh I’m sure glad that this handicap parking spot was open, if it wasn’t, who knows where I’d be”. There’s a reason he was convicted of manslaughter.
26 likes@Zach Vinson This may be the most insanely nonsensical comment I've ever read.
56 likes@Metal Gamer Haha! Good one.
2 likes@Zach Vinson
28 likesYes. Too often I have seen truly handicapped people struggle when a non-stickered car parks in a handicapped stall. That man was wrong and deserves to be punished for what he did.
But people who wrongly park in handicapped stalls are scum.
Thank you!
0 likes@Squiggly Line u care about the law but u defend murderers over parking citations lol
48 likes@Red Diver I’m not referring to places like grocery stores or something. When you’re referring to something a little bigger, I totally get it. Biggest douche move in the world. I totally agree. There was a video I seen of a guy who couldn’t get his wheelchair ramp out because a lady parked in the middle of the lines on a spot. So I totally see what you mean. But because someone parked in one at a rundown gas station that was “his store” he felt he needed to do something about it. Which got someone killed. That’s what I meant when I’m referring to the handicap spot. If it’s Walmart or something, I totally get it. But a 10 second stop at a rundown gas station isn’t the same. I feel like context matters in these situations.
9 likes@Zach Vinson
8 likes"...a 10 second stop at a rundown gas station isn’t the same."
Yes, it is. It is exactly the same.
I’m dead
0 likesThanks for the update
0 likes@Zach Vinson We are VERY grateful for those spots, and we SAY SO too. I guess you're a teenager and yet to develop to the adult stage, why else would you make such an inane comment!? Hmm, he shot an unarmed man, perhaps that's why he was convicted of manslaughter. Just a guess, of course.
6 likes@Zach Vinson <---- this guy parks in handicap spots
7 likes@Johnny Natrium are you really suggesting that it was her fault her husband was shot and killed in front of their young children no less, because she parked in a disabled spot which was the furthest from the door and every single spot in front of the door was actually available. We don’t even get to see the actual spot!! It could be one that has no post and barely visible paint on the ground! I happen to live 20 mins from where this happened and I can tell you 100% that we have MANY spots where it’s not immediately obvious if your not specifically looking! But yea your probably right… it’s all her fault.
15 likes@Melissa Coulter How about you read my comment again; the answer to your question is right there. Do I really have to remind you that you completely made up your entire accusation upon which you base your gripe with me? Look at your first sentence, which is a question based upon sheer fantastical speculation about what I might be thinking, and then look at my comment to see that you never needed to ask that question.
3 likesSo now people should be mindful of not parking in certain spots so they don't get shot based on most arguments I've read that's the assessment I've come to make.
11 likes@Metal Gamer that's pretty weird that you think handicapped spaces should be given to non-handicapped people when there are other spaces available. that's almost like the exact opposite of how that should work
3 likes@Squiggly Line i am telling you this as a full time wheelchair user, it doesn't fucking matter. Her boyfriend was slaughtered in front of her over a miniscule misstep. She has no blame here, this man would have killed anyone who became slightly aggressive with his self-appointed entitlement to authority. Mistakes do not mean someone should die.
15 likesWhy did I read this with JCS narrator's voice?
3 likes@Jon Norwood thats not what they’re saying…
0 likesthat judge was a savage 🤣🤣🤣
1 likeThank you
0 likes@berry pretty macular degeneration in his leg?
0 likesSweet justice. I don't feel bad about it at all.
0 likes@Johnny Natrium The parking space was not a legal handicapped space with the proper signage approved by the town. As the deputy on the scene explained. Drejka was illegally parked.
7 likes@Johnny Natrium What a price to pay for an oversight. Just doesn't make sense to me as a mother myself.
1 like@Jon Norwood no, I didn't.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things Who said it makes sense to me? If I may humbly offer some advice: stop stressing yourself out by filling in other people's thoughts and views with negativity, based on some preconditioned assumption that people who say one person was in the wrong, automatically think the other person was right in doing what they did. This shapes such a common misguided worldview where people are reduced to one-dimensional evil or good, based on simplistic and generalizing interpretations of opinions.
2 likes@Johnny Natrium You gaslight people. Ok that's it for me. Bye
3 likesIn Florida he will pull what 85% of that..the dude didn't seem together his actions at all.
0 likes@Johnny NatriumAfter noticing your many condescending statements in this feed. Ive seen how you respond to others.-- You see in others what you cannot admit is in yourself.( Hint, nobody cares that much to attack you in any way.)
6 likesSomehow I found pleasure in hearing that.
1 like@Squiggly Line still it doesn't justify being killed by police wannabe person
0 likesYou'd almost think he caught his wife cheating on him in a car parked in a handicapped spot, or saw his father get killed by somebody who was parked in one with how OBSESSED his is with those handicapped spots and the inappropriate amount of rage he has for people who park in one without the placard. Chill dude. That's not exactly the most pressing issue in our society today.
16 likesReplies (1)
Your right in this case, many parking spots next to it available.
0 likesIf it was a full parking lot I could understand his pount of view to check.. (I have also the habbit to check for the card when I walk by a car parked in a handicap spot. And when I see non and someone sitting in the car they also get my dirty look pointed at them.. even I'm not a handicapted man)
The whole vibe I got from this guy was a denied soldier, an unfit cop, couldn’t even land a job as a security guard. I feel like this guy has been waiting his entire life for an opportunity to be a hero in some fantasy he conjured up. The way he spoke to these police officers made me feel that way.
9187 likesReplies (136)
You're right. That's why you don't physically assault people, because you might assault the wrong armed hothead.
394 likesYep..exactly..its kind of pathetic but when I was 21 I was hired as security to look for bombs in the Marriott hotel in times square new York City after a 12 hour class (which was 2 that tbe instructor gave us tbe answer for ..and I was on opiates) . ..he obviously had problems that other people saw in him .. BUT he was a neighborhood watchmen which is very prestigious ...
83 likesBen Kaplan haha that’s a cool tidbit about yourself. What a strange job, for stranger times.
27 likesLee Ham it’s true. I feel really sad for both men, especially Markeis. He made a decision to honor his family with considerable aggression, and moments later he lost his one and only life. That’s it. He was cast into the eternal mystery. All because Michael Drejka wanted to be somebody, and never was.
201 likesI got the same vibe, he was so ready to defend himself on the self-defense grounds and he seemed to be the classical gun owner, dont tread on my lands, i vote trump type
178 likesForgot to add: Drives a truck
89 likes@Christer Knutsen lmao that guys not your classical gun owner I’ve been around guns my whole life and have never met anyone or known of anyone in my family who went to prison for shooting someone. If anything my dads old pilot instructor went to prison for trying to kill his gf or some shit with a crossbow.
75 likesI work for a city and he’s the kind of guy who makes multiple parking complaints a day
47 likes@Lee Ham or... that's why you don't give away permits and guns to citizens as if they were, I don't know... TENNIS RACKETS ?
57 likes@Lee Ham black guy was defending his lady who was being verbally assaulted by a strange hothead white dude. He shouldn't have shoved him, no, but it was at least understandable as he was probably scared for his woman.
93 likes100% agree. That's exactly the vibes I got.
6 likes@Abby Cross Scared for his woman? Don't put your hands on another person. The crazy white guy was shouting, but shouting isn't a crime. Battery is.
42 likes@LEGO Ghost Yoda You are correct; that guy should not have shot the unarmed man who was walking away.
29 likesThis does not mean that the shooter shouldn't have had a gun; he just shouldn't have fired it. Guns save lives, too.
@Lee Ham Not in the US they don't.
42 likes@Abby Cross I believe they do. What evidence do you have to support this? If a criminal attempts to harm someone, a law-abiding citizen can use a gun to fend off the attacker. This happens often. The FBI statistics say it happen at least 500 000 times a year, or up to 3 000 000 times a year. It's pretty obvious that a tool designed for harm can be used to harm deviant individuals.
25 likesThat makes a lot of sense
1 like@Lee Ham 3000000 times a year? No.
17 likes@Abby Cross Even if we take the low number (500 000) it is still a lot. Guns are as much of a tool for self defense as they are for crime.
23 likesSeems to me like he was waiting for a moment to use it , on anyone or anybody
42 likesLol felt the same 😱
2 likesAgreed
1 like@helBob arhh no mate.
1 likeYou're describing a "Kyle"
5 likesAHAHAHAHAHA YESSSS
0 likes@alex esposito cast into the eternal mystery. That’s beautiful.
5 likesgolden shower king you’re right.
0 likes@Abby Cross Scared for his woman that an old man is scolding her? So scared of him that he has to assault him and throw him to the ground? Say what you will about grandpa's character and his shitty personality, but god damn assaulting someone like that especially when they're not violent or directly threatening is just stupid. Neither of these men made particularly good choices
18 likes@killsalot78 grandpa? He looks pretty middle-aged to me. And she wasnt getting a tsk-tsk finger-wagging from him, he was yelling at her. No, he shouldn't have shoved him. But the guy you think is ancient (???) shouldn't have shot a retreating man.
25 likesI agree, especially the way he was trying to police the handicapped parking spots. No normal person would even care about something so minor but I could see someone who wanted and failed to be a civil servant their whole life doing stupid stuff like this to feel important.
24 likesGot the same vibe, guy is the complete opposite of a responsible gun owner. Someone looking for confrontation because he can hide under the saftey of having a firearm with him. I feel like had the victim not shoved him he probably wouldn't have shot him but the clown clearly has never been in a fight at all and being scared he chose to murder someone else because of his own insecurities. Sad little man that Mr. Drekja
28 likes@Abby Cross nothing had happened to his woman. He wanted to be a big man and suffered for it. Words aren't equal to physical violence.
6 likes@Alastor true, and shoving isnt equal to getting shot.
11 likes@Abby Cross didnt say it was. Any other useless info you wanna throw my way?
12 likes@Grant M. Why? Some people are crazy. Don't play with crazy; you'll get sued or worse.
6 likes@Lee Ham You have to judge the situation as you would react in the moment. If all I saw was a random guy yelling at my wife and being aggressive, my first impulse would be to defend her in this case. I don’t think I would have attacked him, but that still would be a reasonable thing to do.
9 likes@Lee Ham you were the one who made the original claim that “guns save lives” therefore the burden of proof is on you.
5 likes@Lee Ham but we don’t know what this guy said to the wife to cause the aggression by the father. Is it not possible this guy threatened the wife? This guy is clearly unstable and has an aggressive history. Just another perspective to consider. Either way, we can’t have people shooting people like this.
5 likes@Priscilla I already gave evidence, Priscilla. The FBI statistics show that roughly 500 000 - 3 000 000 crimes are stopped by guns each year in the USA. From that data, we can assume that a portion of those crimes are life-threatening, and proves that guns save lives.
4 likes@Anavader Duo That is an excellent point, and one I did not not consider. At this point, I'll just have to accept that there is more gray area here than I originally thought. If he was threatening his wife, then I think it's justifiable; the black man would not be at fault.
11 likesI still stand by my thoughts of "don't mess with crazy" however. Being crazy isn't against the law, so there are crazies just waiting to do something like this. Be careful out there, people. You don't know until you have experience with someone like that, so try not to make your first experience with crazy your last .
@Anavader Duo the victim came out and saw an aggressive male arguing with his gf with his kids in the car. Im not surprised that he shoved this guy away. There are lots of incidences caused by cowards like the guy in this video who, after being confronted for trying to intimidate a woman, pulls a gun when faced with another male. He threatened another woman with kids before. Pathetic.
12 likes@Lee Ham gun self defense statistics are widely regarded as exaggerated, same as any self reported number. these “criminals” they defend against are almost never caught and almost never go to the hospital afterward so there aren’t medical records to support it. the amount of people who’ve said they’ve used a gun for self defense is about the same as as many americans said yes when asked if they believe in aliens. also 500,000-3,000,000 is one hell of a window, ain’t it?
8 likesYou just described my ex husband.
2 likesI Repent worry walked beside you.
0 likesUnfortunately there are a bunch of these types around.
1 likeI think he has a hatred towards black people and that fueled his verbal assault on this woman, I bet if it was a white woman parked like that he wouldn’t blink,
8 likesThat’s how all these killers think
2 likesNegative. Definately just trying to neutralize the area. Nothing to see here, officer.
6 likes😭🤦♀️ this was exhausting to watch lol
Why don’t you make your argument and leave your least favorite politician out of it? You went from making sense to illogically flawed nonsense in seconds.
1 likeHes trying soo hard to talk like a officer
3 likesHe retired in his thirties which I think is kinda pathetic.
1 likeAFFIRMATIVE
2 likesSome people here have really strange thoughts when it comes to "be a man". Beeing a man (in a situation like that) means to be in or to establish control. By sucker shoving the dude you only create chaos and that means anything can happen.
2 likesIts that false perception of "beeing a man" that escalted the situation. Yet people still brag that they would to the same. I dunno what to say about that.
You should meet some of the guys like him who barely did make it in...barracks life is interesting.
2 likes@Stoned97 I liked that one too.
0 likesits like he has a hero complex but wasn't good enough to join the army or become a cop
3 likesHe was the security guard over the handicap parking spots at his local gas station that he goes to every day!
1 likePaul blart gone rouge
1 likeprobably was too lazy to lift so he could not land any job where could be a bully.
1 like100%. He's a lame wannabe who thinks hes the baddest cop around. For some reason the vibe i got from his interview was that he felt like he was some sort of hero for shooting this guy. Especially when he sounded annoyed when he hard someone screaming about their kids and didnt bother to see if anything else was wrong because he didnt feel threatened (sorry er "neutralized the threat"
5 likes@Lee Ham are we talking about the guy murdering someone over a parking spot or the man protecting his wife?
5 likes100%
0 likesChrister Knutsen I get the vibe you are a city-slicker, that you don’t know how to change a tire, that you can’t feed yourself without a grocery store and would vote for Joe Biden 🤣
0 likes"This guy has been waiting his entire life for an opportunity to be a hero in some fantasy he conjured up" according to you. This should be applied to the person who pushed. He was the one who showed off and he bit the bullet.
1 likeDiamond Cooper I get the feeling you would shoot a man in the lower abdomen based on some get-even principle. Just like our pal Mike.
5 likes@alex esposito Don't try to change the topic. Please admit that your comment is flawed.
1 likeDiamond Cooper there are very clear variables behind the wrong doings of both of these men. One of them is dead. The other seemed satisfied the moment he heard about it. Glad to have policed a parking spot. Glad to have shot a father in front of his three children. Because in his own mind, he was a justified authority. Unfortunately, the dead don’t get to plead their case. But I bet Markeis wouldn’t have sounded anything like Michael.
5 likesImagine being unfit to be a cop lol. “Sir you don’t meet sack of shit standards. There’s the door.”
4 likesThat would hurt deep. Just as deep as his celly is going in tonight. Dry.
@STBD I should have just said this to begin with. “Peak”, considering he fucking killed a man. Couldn’t agree with you more.
2 likesMe too
1 like@Lee Ham - Not to mention you will to jail time for assault.
0 likes@Lee Ham - Agreed. The guy that pushed Mike to the ground, would have been charge with assault and done jail time, Mike should have just called the cops and let the law arrest the man that put his hands on someone. Talking in public isn't a crime so at that point they had nothing on the shooter, other than also parking illegally.
1 likeNah man, I know these kind of people. it's a guy who failed his life, is weak and has an inferiority complex, that's why he bothers random people, to take his anger out on them. Feel bad for the victim
5 likesSpot on.
0 likesThe way you felt is why the jury found him guilty. Everyone felt that, even the judge because the judge destroys him verbally during the court proceedings. I think the closing arguments or sentencing.
3 likesThat is rather tragic. How many families have been broken because of the power fantasies of those Punisher-wannabe losers
5 likesThis man is the physical embodiment of MAGA
6 likesI understand his anger. Stop parking in handicap spots if you aren’t handicap or have a placard. Nowadays, it’s a big difference. People just walking around with loaded guns may have a mom and gets irritated at the asshole who has parked wrongly. The courts would never select me as a juror. Get these damn guns off of the streets, it’s not okay. People get angry at this type of behavior. Wonder if the police or anyone told these people to park appropriately. Too many angry Americans in this world today. For example, I live in a adult only 1 bedroom apartment building and suffer from really bad headaches, so why is there a family of 4 including two children under 8 living above me. I have called many times and have even gone up the steps myself and remind them that the thumping and banging from the little boy is too much. I am putting my rent in escrow until that family moves. In the meantime, when they thump, I use a plastic baseball bat and bang on the ceiling. If it happens again, I will start banging at 2 and 3 in the morning. Besides I specifically asked before moving in if there were children in the building and I was told no. They lied. I know this doesn’t have much to do with the shooting but people’s actions can sometimes hit a nerve. I understand him. He didn’t need to kill anyone though. Have to be extra careful these days. Nice family above me but wrong place, they have to go where their children can do what children do, but after a year, I am not moving. They don’t belong in this building at all.
2 likesalex esposito He had no business parking in a handicap spot.
1 like@Mylesa Stinnette Michael Drejka had no business being a parking lot security officer.
4 likes"The way he spoke to these police" - I agree he was a fool however blabbling your mouth to the police will always get you banged up.
1 like@Bradley harness what!??? Your dad’s old pilot instructor tried using a crossbow to kill someone? Damn. That’s nuts
2 likes@Lee Ham He was physically assaulted first.
1 like@Applecompuser No the assault was the threats that drejka did first, what the woman should of done was called the cops on him and even could of said that he has a gun. If the operator heard kids in the background crying, there's a high probability that they would of rushed. But let's be honest, we are talking about the people of Florida.
3 likesYep, a wannabe cop, but couldn’t make the grade.
2 likes@Lee Ham my thoughts EXACTLY. What happened to McGlockton is tragic but was it really necessary for him to so forcefully push a guy he doesn't know because he had 45 second argument with his girlfriend (where she was at fault)?
0 likesJust ignore him, get in the car and leave. You NEVER know who you're dealing with.
Stand your ground needs to be amended.
@Bradley harness I think she meant classic gun owner who shouldn't be allowed to be in possession of a gun.
1 like@earentill best response on this entire video. This is the issue and this will always be an issue as long as owning a gun that can take a life in a matter of seconds is as simple as walking into Wal Mart and having a clean record.
2 likesIf he was a cop, it would have played...
2 likesDamn right.
0 likesI work with a couple of people who are desperate to be in leader positions but very obviously would make terrible leaders, their vision of leadership is how I imagine this guys vision is .
2 likesMore than likely President of the Moan & Groan Society... 🗣💤 🇬🇧
1 likeI got that vibe too. Hard not to.
1 likeNailed it Alex
2 likes@Lee Ham bro don't even walk to close to sme people
2 likes@Robert Bellamy Oh did he? You seem very weak. Very very weak.
0 likesI agreed
0 likesYes. You’re right. Wanna be Rambo
0 likesDEAD on, Alex.
0 likes@killsalot78
0 likesOh good lord, you must be very young… 😬😑
@Eye Gotcha lol, why are you projecting?
2 likes@Lee Ham pushing someone isn’t 🔋
1 likeExactly
1 like@alex esposito yeah I'm sure the career criminal was nothing but honorable, between taking a handicapped stall when plenty others are empty to blindsiding someone in the literal video in front of you, he just reeeks of honor
1 like@Trollashnikov Avtomat I’m sure most people can somehow identify with both Michael and Markeis. If I unknowingly walked into this situation as Markeis, I would probably have gotten myself killed also. I like to think that if I was Michael, I would have shown some legitimate restraint and didn’t pull the trigger.
1 likeWell said.
2 likesAffirmative
1 likeYES! I’m glad someone said it. The way he spoke made me angry since I knew he wasn’t in the military or a cop. And did he just want to do those things so he could finally use a gun? His Defense lawyer also sounded so full of shit. Even without knowing any of the case, I think I would have made the same face as that one lady in the jury. The prosecution team did a great job highlighting the FACTS
1 likeFacts!!
1 likeI completely, agree.
1 likeIt’s really sad, the desire for validation ate up his own morality, at least that’s how I see it
1 like100%
0 likes100%
0 likes@Didificcuideiidfdick could not agree more. So spot on. His life was completely sucked into some falsehood that never actually mattered. This was some kind of act of character for him.
1 like@Bradley harness I think @Christer Knutsen means stereotypical gun owner instead of classical gun owner. If so, then I agree. Where I live, everyone owns guns and people get stabbed more then they do shot.
0 likesi wholeheartedly agree with that.
1 like@Christer Knutsen he literally drives an suv I hope you don’t have kids or if you do they know the difference between a Toyota Tacoma and a Toyota 4 runner
0 likesTotally!!
1 likeI was also getting that vibe. I feel like he's one of those gun owners who is itching for an excuse to justify carrying. And now he's found himself in a situation where he can trick himself into believing that he has to shoot. Even though it's incredibly clear that this is not the case.
0 likesHis whole attitude makes him completely unfit to carry. It's perfectly legitimate to carry in the off chance you need to protect yourself or others, but it must be with an attitude of last resort. Of never wanting to ever utilize that EVER.
As I stated, I think he's tricked himself into thinking he's in the fantasy situation he's always wanted to be in, and thus I don't even think he was lying. Possibly the same goes for his "injuries" that he was over-playing. And because of his fantasies, a man, a father, is now dead.
The scariest and most pitiful thing is that he's not a rare sort.
0 likesI absolutely 💯 agree with you. 👏👏👏
0 likes@Lee Ham wow! Thank you for victim blaming That's so cool. Did you not hear the part where he aggressively threatened 4 other people with his gun? That one of those people was a mother with her two children? It seems like this man was looking for someone to hurt. How about we just say don't be this horrible person and leave it at that.
1 likeI agree with you.
0 likesAgreed
0 likesVery well said kind sir
0 likesHe walked around in our world with hate and depression. It found an outlet. It's sad to imagine what sort of family he grew up with.
0 likesThose children who are beaten will in turn give beatings, those who are intimidated will be intimidating, those who are humiliated will impose humiliation, and those whose souls are murdered will murder.
And a proper chicken without a gun
0 likes@Lee Ham Screaming in someone's face is a crime if you refuse to leave them alone lol
0 likes@Abby Cross Hes actually correct about that
0 likesSame. The way he says "negative" instead of "no", and uses bullshit words like "force multiplier" just SCREAMS "I idolize the military, but am too unfit to actually serve."
0 likesIt's embarrassing.
Well said. Absolutely 💯 agree
0 likesLol you got that “vibe” without speaking with him one word did you?? Wow you should be a private Investigator or at least a Homicide detective
0 likes@Lee Ham Scared for his woman lol
0 likes@Bradley harness he is though, just looking for that ideal scenario hes always dreamed of to finally have a legitimate use for his firearm. all gun owners have had that dream. except he got it wrong
0 likesFully agree
0 likesHe got a purple heart in naum
0 likes@Lee Ham love to see him outdraw me.
0 likesThis guy was so proud of himself, waited his whole life for it
10 likesReplies (1)
And he got exactly what he bargained for
0 likesAfter watching this video im inclined to believe if he would've lawyered up before this interrogation he might be walking free to this day.
116 likesReplies (18)
Unfortunately since Florida is a “Stand Your Ground” Law state, that very well may be true.
12 likesat which time in intergorrations can you get a lawyer? beause I havent seen a person in these videos who got one.
1 like@Moritz Dietrich at any time, the moment your Miranda rights are read to you, you can ask for a lawyer, and the interrogation has to stop right then and there.
15 likes@Moritz Dietrich Literally any point.
7 likesIt’s baffling to me how nobody does. From the moment they walk in they can sit down and refuse to speak until they get a lawyer. That’s the smart thing to do, but thankfully, these people aren’t very smart.
I agree. The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is a perfect example of what lawyering up will do for you. Had Kyle gone thru an interrogation like this one he would have also made statements that would have been used against him at trial. Regardless of anyone opinions of the wrongness or rightness of that case it’s just a fact that police are not trying to cut you slack.
10 likesThey are trying to get you to say incriminating things and to ask you what happened so that when you make errors they can claim you were being dishonest when most people have trouble relaying accurate details of a stressful situation that can stand up to scrutiny.
The cops would have asked Kyle a bunch of leading questions just like here and the strength of his case would have been weakened because he doesn’t know what a lawyer knows. And if he said the wrong thing it could have buried him.
Whoever convinced him to lawyer up deserves his eternal, lifelong gratitude.
There are plenty of innocent people in prison who wish they had just shut up and refused to answer any questions but it’s human nature to try and explain yourself. To try and justify your actions. And the police use this to their advantage.
@Moritz Dietrich usually cause lawyered up people who get off aren't interesting to watch
3 likes@Arctic Terra he’s not standing his ground when there’s clear video of the other person disengaging and walking away. Even if he had said nothing there was still the other man there the entire time that was not with them that witnessed the whole thing. This would never have been a case of stand your ground. The guy shot didn’t tackle him to the ground. He clearly pushed a clear threat away from his family. He pushed him away. He did not walk up and punch him.
2 likes@Melissa Coulter My point was less that this was justified (it was absolutely not), and more that a lawyer in a stand your ground state could make an incredibly convincing argument for this as self-defense, since really all you need in those states is “fear for your life”
1 likeIf he had spoken to a lawyer without this interrogation, this likely could have ended with his lawyer and him crafting a story that he was “shaken up” by the events and his adrenaline was pumping causing him to genuinely fear for his life or something.
You’d be surprised how easy stand your ground laws make it to get away with unjust killings when you have a good lawyer.
He absolutely would have gotten off with a great lawyer and if he kept his mouth shut. Saying that if the guy stood still, he would have no reason to shoot and saying that he couldn't see the guy's face were huge mistakes. If he kept his mouth shut, I guarantee a lawyer would've told him to say that he saw fury and rage in the victim's face and that he truly felt like the man was going to continue attacking him based on the look in his eyes. He could've also said the man verbally threatened him since the CCTV camera didn't pick up audio and the victim's face was looking away from the camera. Our justice system is broken and this guy definitely would've gotten off, or at least a significantly reduced sentence, if he had a good lawyer.
2 likes@Moritz Dietrich you can get one immediately and not talk to the cops at all. If the guy had done that and hired a good lawyer there's a very good chance he would have gotten off, or at least a much lighter sentence.
1 likeabsolutely. never talk to police.
0 likesbecause of Florida's stupid law you are probably right
0 likes@Moritz Dietrich you can ask for one immediately but they never do. I think the lady cop who committed murder was the fastest one on this channel to request a lawyer. I guess most of these criminals think the detectives are stupid and they can lie their way out of it. it's so funny too watch they are in over their heads. detectives are some of the smartest people on the plsnet its nothing like lying to your mommy about not taking any extra cookies. LOL
2 likesNot with the camera as evidence. No way
0 likes@Arctic Terra nothing wrong with standing ur ground
1 like@CounterSniper Kyle was interrogated he was defending hisself
2 likes@Arctic Terra Belief has to be reasonable §776.012(2) "A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony."
0 likesYes. Never talk to the police.
0 likesThis case is so sad - I can say for a fact, if my man saw another man yelling at me while he was inside of the store he would come out and attempt to protect me like this man did. The fact that he was killed doing so is so tragic.
3 likesI'm from the UK so I have no experience with guns, but I imagine 2 things:
40 likesBeing pushed after causing a scene, doesn't constitute a threatening situation (Unless the man had gotton ontop of him, but as we see here he pushed him and then stepped back to show restraint and willingness to stop this from escalating) I mean maybe when you're 7 years old you think being pushed over is the end of the world, but come on.
And secondly when you pull out the gun, the situation instantly comes to a stop. He ain't going to push the little crazy man over again while a gun is being aimed. Firing the gun is what doesn't make sense.
Replies (3)
I wrote this before finishing the video, the proscutor explained it well xD
1 likeThese are all good points
1 likeI live in Boston, MA, and if a cop saw someone with a weapon he'd have a gun to his head, be on the ground, and be handcuffed before he could aim a gun at someone. Up North, this doesn't happen. In the southern states, it does.
0 likesIf the cops are being nice to you; you're most likely going to jail for a long time.
64265 likesReplies (446)
Generally when they are very pissed, you won't spend a day in jail. That means their evidence is NONE.
6610 likesEvery cop I have talked to has been very nice with me
4050 likes@Samuel Ortiz so how's life in jail?
6755 likes@Lucía Rehermann We have cable
9139 likeslol that's what I've absorbed from watching these interrogations
1109 likes@Samuel Ortiz and internet apparently, still better than the cops being real mean.
455 likesNot condoning committing crimes, but if you are ever being interrogated by police always ask for a lawyer. Even if you're innocent, get one.
2092 likesTrue and if cops are being mean to you get a lawyer keep your mouth shut they got nothing on you
477 likes@West Taiwan this cannot be overstated. Especially if you feel like they think you did something.
493 likesor you're white
431 likestony F actually.... a lot of facilities have limited access. I used to love receiving snail mail from some of the offenders I deal with in my research but they’re all slowly getting eaten up by JPay and states are buying into their email stations and tablet programs. Now I have to buy “virtual stamps” to send messages
59 likes20 years for murdering a father
80 likesI had a good cop bad cop situation couple of times. They just wanted my money
43 likesChristian H ...yea right
5 likesNot exactly same degree of seriousness, but I got caught driving WO a full licence. (First snowfall, car slid, then car behind pushed me into parked bus as his car also slid)
86 likesThere were 3 people now involved...me, the other driver, and the car owner who was very close as I almost reached my destination.
So, cop asked me to sit in front w him. I was sweating a bit about that, as I was sitting beside his rifle (RCMP) . He asked the two men in back for usual info and describe situation. Then it was my turn. He asked for license, I said I didn't have it. I had none. I was unsure how he'd react. He asked me to describe situation, and he proceeded to compliment me on my handling of the car, said most wouldn't react that way. I forget now what I did lol as it was a Grand Marquis automatic!!! Lol
Honestly, he was the nicest cop I ever met! Ended up with a warning and 250.00 fine!
But I do agree with rest of the comments here, just sharing a memory I guess! Ty
But those nice cops released him. The public pressure is why he was indicted a month later.
60 likesTell that to Casey Anthony. The biggest failure of the us justice system recently
117 likesLmfao
1 likeGarrett Emrick Especially if you’re innocent. If you’re guilty as hell it might not matter, if you are innocent it sure as hell does.
13 likes@Samuel Ortiz were you being interrogated or were they talking tio you after pulling you over. Cause they can be alright and nice on a street stop but if they brought you in for a crime and suspect it's you but dont have enough evidence they go hard on you and try tio verbally beat you into submission hoping to crack you.
6 likesSamuel Ortiz may I ask what skin tone you are
4 likes@Properly Gaming good thing you don't have to say shit and just call a lawyer
3 likesSamuel Ortiz well he’s really it’s with detective not cops they are the other way around
1 like65% true
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz I mean if you are well informed you do, but not everyone is informed they need to immediatley ask for a lawyer and shut your mouth guilty or not.
5 likesDetectives, not cops. A nice cop is usually preferred over a prick during a traffic stop.
19 likes@Properly Gaming always observe the right to remain silent... especially if you really fuck up.
11 likesLiza Tanzawa what has blm done?
7 likesYou clearly don’t have law enforcement experience.
6 likesibliss Then why are they nice to me, a black mixed female?
26 likes@Liza Tanzawa yes they are soooo important. Look at all the good they've done for blacks! /s
8 likesThey don't have your best interests in mind.
Never, ever talk to cops without a lawyer present
8 likes@Samuel Ortiz "we have cable" solid reply
13 likesGarrett Emrick yes
1 likeYou don't use a semicolon in that sentence. You use a comma.
6 likes@Jack Mehoffer how do you get a lawyer? Youall talk like they grow out of the ground after the rain
6 likes@Samuel Ortiz Same, even when it wasn't in passing. I even had a cop shave off some of my speed when I was speeding so I wouldn't have extra problems on top of the ticket.
3 likes@Oleg de Papa how do you get a lawyer? You look at the cop and say..."lawyer"
23 likes@Liza Tanzawa only, it's decisively NOT necessary. In fact, the entire organization is based on a lie and is founded and run by Marxists.
5 likes@Oleg de Papa what you absolutely do not do after a shooting like this is sit blabbing with a cop. First thing out of your mouth needs to be "I need medical attention" ....anything at all you say after that a lawyer can say was under duress.
12 likes@Jack Mehoffer lol
0 likes@Jack Mehoffer thats the magic word? And the lawyer will pop out of the lamp and grant my three wishes?
6 likes@Oleg de Papa he will certainly keep you out of a 20 year jail sentence. You only ever should use 2 sentences with Cops...1) "I need medical attention" and 2) "I intend to fully cooperate with your investigation officer as soon as I have my lawyer present"
21 likesJack Mehoffer facts.
4 likesOleg de Papa ..you don’t, but yes trust me lawyers pretty much do grow on trees these days lol there r more than enough out there and I’m sure many, many competent ones if you may ever need one hopefully not tho.. too many lawyers to even choose from and they all want your business lol so anyways all I’m saying is only a fool would go talk to the cops thinking they’re smarter than them, without a lawyer present. Cuz If you’re like me and the common person then you probably don’t know ALL of your rights and the laws and also cops are allowed to lie to you, so it’s just not smart. Get a lawyer. They OBVIOUSLY don’t want to screw you over like a cop/detective would or trick you. They WANT you to win because that’s their job and it’s their reputation on the line.. understand?
6 likesSamuel Ortiz this is the best reply I’ve seen to a joke in the entirety of all youtube comments
4 likes@Properly Gaming makes no mistake about it, when you get pulled over the cops are actually interrogating you from thr first to last words spoken.
2 likes@aunt jenifer they wanna catch you slipping but they aren't going in for a confession because they don't have a specific crime they think you have committed other then you speeding or having something wrong with your vehicle most times.
1 likeThis guy thinks by calling the interrogators "brother" and "dude" and "man" and using military sounding language like "NEGATIVE" he will be seen as relatable.
10 likesAh okay..................................NURSE!!
1 like@Dianna Grady what?
1 likeThey are all racist thats most likely. They probably didn't care.
5 likes@Kyle Miller Pardon me but I wanted to understand your answer better. What?
1 like@Samuel Ortiz I beat someone up that pulled a knife out on me an the guy that pulled the knife out phoned the police and said I beat him up then pulled a knife out on him. They were such arse holes to me in the interrogation room and kept telling me they saw the cctv and they knew that I beat him up and pulled the knife out, I shit my pants thinking I'm going to go down for years in prison but I found out they had absolutely no evidence on me at all. The guy I "pulled the knife out on" also ended up with a hash wound to his hand and apparently I did that, that's how pathetic and desperate the case was.
5 likesHe did something wrong , very wrong but I don’t think he’s a bad man.
3 likesSamuel Ortiz 😹 and TikTok ive seen
0 likesHaha, right!
0 likesmichael boultinghouse like my boy Mike Ehrmantraut.
0 likesNope
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz you in prison yet in contact with anyone from around the world? Wtf
0 likes@Liza Tanzawa I stayed for the cable. Shark week was awesome.
5 likesSooo always get a lawyer lmao
0 likesBingo
0 likes😂😂😂😂😂
0 likesOr white
5 likes@Da Bossoh, right!
0 likesI didn't pass road test. I had the learner's permit, and was in process of achieving driver's license.
I was young at the time, not exactly best idea, but the outcome could have been way worse! Imo
i disagree ive had a few encounters where cops where nice to me and ive never been to jail
0 likesive been questioned like that twice
💡💡
0 likesibliss blah blah
2 likesGarrett Emrick yes totally agree
0 likesIf you speak without a lawyer
1 like@Samuel Ortiz Let me guess, are you white? lol
0 likes@QingYun No I'm not. I'm just lucky that the only racists I have encountered are some liberals and a trump supporter outside of a store.
4 likes@Lucía Rehermann :D
0 likesSamuel Ortiz lmao
0 likesI been found sleeping in my car once with the engine on at a store that closed like 3 hours ago or something. They asked if I was drinking, and I said yes and showed them that I drunk a whole bottle of smirnoff vodka. They just drove me home. But I will be honest, I think one of them was part russian, so I think he understood.
8 likes@Lucía Rehermann 😆😆😆
0 likesIf they start off with “Hey Buddy my name is Detective “ 😭
1 like@RiverOfSouls Has everything to do with race. That's American society in a nutshell. Covert racism
0 likesThey were really nice to me when I was a witness to a crime. though to be fair, the circumstances were such that there was always a 0% chance I was responsible for the crime.
1 likeSamuel Ortiz lmaoooooooo
0 likes@West Taiwan Oh yeah.... perfect advice. Nothing you say is helpful to YOU. Anything you say IS EVIDENCE, and will be used to put you away, even if you are innocent. If you have a lawyer, the lawyer can say anything needed, and none of it is EVIDENCE for anything. This is difficult to get across for many people. Imagine if he waited for a lawyer, the case would have gone differently.
4 likesPolice are motivated to close cases, with overwhelming evidence. What a gift for the police. He completely destroyed his own defense, while offering his statement.
He identifies as being one "of the guys", like he was a fellow law enforcer. They let him believe that narrative, while they extracted every bit of evidence they needed.
@michael boultinghouse Deep state will drone both Antifa and militias.
1 likeScary and funny but true
0 likeshaha. you are right. God bless you
0 likesThe unawareness is usually a side effect of privilege.
0 likesOh ho!!! My friend bill is a cop and he's very nice. He even bought me a beer... I'm gonna be locked up for a long time
2 likesCops: "Get on your stomach you piece of filth!!!!!!!!!"
3 likesMe: "Ahh, I'm safe!"
Yes, and no. they will try to make you think you're friends when trying to pry info, but when i went to jail when i was 17 they were pretty chill and all i did was get in trouble for drinking in public and being underage
2 likes@michael boultinghouse yeah if they are worried about the police, wait till they get rid of the police. They think that people in the suburbs are going to sit around while a mob surrounds the neighborhood? If there is truly no police groups like this will get massacred.
1 like@michael boultinghouse I wonder if people don't ask for a lawyer because either they think they didn't do anything wrong or if they ask for one then they look guilty.
3 likes@West Taiwan omg, ALWAYS - say you are in the right, you NEED a lawyer so you have a defense in a wrongful death lawsuit or any other personal injury/dmg claims
1 like@Samuel Ortiz 😂😂
1 likeif they let you smoke you go life no parole.
5 likes@ibyss Boring
2 likes@West Taiwan just say, SORRY IM TAKING MY RIGHT TO THE 5TH AMENDMENT AND I WISH TO REMAIN SILENT.
3 likesLet this be a lesson , do not park in handicap spot unless you have a plate. Handicap lives matter
3 likesUsually police conduct multiple avenues of enquiries and investigation which results in a lot of poeple being cleared of any involvement, not the other way around. This in turn makes the eventual evidence against the accused more concrete, as investigations have cleared all others.
1 likeWTF he’s not even in a parking spot himself.
2 likesImma cry I laughed so hard at this
0 likes@Cat Are you a white woman?
0 likes@Advanced Monkey nope. My girlfriend is, and she has gotten in a lot more trouble than I ever have just cus she's an asshole to the cops. I am a colored male. All it takes is being honest with them. Im not saying rat yourself out if you don't have to, but if you're kind it goes a long way since most people are not.
3 likesI got pulled over doing 100mph on the freeway and I was honest about the reason why, and got let go without a ticket. I've been caught with drug paraphernalia. I used hard drugs for 8 years.
All cops are not bad. Most are good people.
@Samuel Ortiz where are you headed? where are you coming from? you got ID? We got a call. I was in fear for my life. Where's your handicap placard? Not in that order.
0 likesYeah I’ve noticed that just from this channel. When they start offer drinks and saying take your time and acting like they believe you. You’re fucked. What I don’t get is why none of these people ever have lawyers. ?
3 likesJust get a lawyer and you'll be fine.
2 likesyeah, so if i am put in this situation i sjuld just piss them off
1 likethis shoulda been pinned on every video
1 likeIf you dont want to get shot dont cone out and go shoving people to the ground
2 likesfor real, don't talk to cops talk to your lawyer even when you're innocent.
3 likes@ibyss true, because if you are white you are racist But if you are a minority you are an angel, how stupid is that?
2 likesIm the woman in the back at 44:05
1 like@michael boultinghouse So in the USA there are psychos who believe in marxism/comunism taking over the press...we have this type here in Brazil too...and also we have the same kind of lunatic president. Where the hell these folks came from?
3 likes@mychannel302 Oh yeah..the public/press are guilty...the jerk who unloaded his gun during that altercation is waaay inocent to be blamed, right?
1 like@ibyss, I always wondered how sad it must be to someone with so little substance and intelligence, that all you ever contribute is racism.
3 likes@A Guy Named Something lived experience holds more water than mainstream media.
4 likes@Lucía Rehermann they're still building a case against him. He better lawyer up now.
0 likesYup i am a recovering addict... ive been arrested twice. Second time they offered me a cigarette and i was like “FUUUUUUCKKKKK.” Usually you could BEG and they wouldnt give you one but they offered lol. Bd sign trust me.
2 likes@K B D 2586 indeed. I'm glad you're covering. Keep it up. Get your self sorted out and stick with it.
1 like@Jack Mehoffer Although some people do, you should never speak to police before a trial, even with a lawyer present. Waiting until trial forces them to provide any evidence they will use against you which gives you a big advantage and you won't lock yourself into a story early. A good lawyer won't let you speak to the police even if they are present
1 likeLol
1 like@JS yeah, very true, sadly. I've just been very lucky and never had a bad experience with a police officer. Plenty of encounters with them..
0 likes@michael boultinghouse no
0 likes*prison
0 likesAfter reading this:
1 likeCop: Do you want a soda?
Subscriber: Oh no, I am flipping done 😭
@ibyss exactly
1 like@BaDaBoom wtf?
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likes@West Taiwan this the most true shit i’ve ever seen
0 likespeople think it’ll make them look innocent if they talk to the cops without a lawyer but it’s never a good idea
@sky the weeb even if you don't feel like they think you did something. If you're still in custody, you're involved and anything you say might make you a suspect, either in the current crime or another.
0 likes@ibyss ignorant comment. lol
1 liketrue dat, they prolly happy they wrapped up the case
0 likesNo true at all
0 likesU got that sht right
0 likesHave you seen Jeff :D
0 likesor you're white
1 like13k likes? You gotta give the good ones out there alot of credit. I'd probably end up being a dick. I mean, I've had more uneventful experiences with them than frustrating ones.. and I've been arrested like 4 times.
0 likes@Nicholi Larson there are no good cops
0 likes@Gwen well we didn't just decide we needed law enforcement for no reason one day. There might need to be a harder vetting process, because you definitely don't need bad cops; but there are some good honest people out there.
1 like@Nicholi Larson the police in the united states started as a force to capture runaway slaves.
0 likes@Nicholi Larson they protect the powerful and keep minorities in line
0 likesNice, mean ... or indifferent ... there is BIG money in arrests. We don't pour hundred$ of billion$ into the just us system for nothing.
0 likes@Toby Nixon right their job was made easy by the CCTV footage. You could hear the disgust In the sheriff's voice.
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz 🤣
0 likes@Tais's Tea Sad day in america. That man reacted how my father would of reacted. Nobody talks to my mom like she is below them.
0 likes😂
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz they always talk sweet to snitches 😂
0 likesRight?
0 likesOr your a white middle aged man....
2 likesThe entire world seems to need an indifferent law enforcement system. Any part our law enforcement played in capturing slaves is despicable. Since I am a white fella, I can't put myself in black people's shoes, it's hard to grasp the thought of my whole race having been through what black folks have. If a white cop doesn't have the guts or the brains to treat a situation the same because of skin color, then he's a bad cop. There ain't no place in an impartial system for any of that. Then the ones influenced by greed can't be a part of it either. Im not saying that alot of change doesn't have to happen. I dang sure believe that humans have been around long enough to understand there's gotta be some law out there, and punishment for breaking it. People are to ruthless and selfish to go without it. Especially if they're scared. Sometimes it takes an actual damn war. The people with enough character to be a good cop are important. That doesn't make me some kind of rat.. you're stupid if you go around snitchin and you ain't a cop.
0 likes@ibyss without doubt
0 likesI've never talked to the cops before. But from watching these the angrier they are the more they need what the criminal isnt saying.
0 likes@Katrina Punkari especially if you're gonna do the dance and find yourself caught.. it's just not something you do. For a couple reasons. There's something else to be said about seeing something serious and being called as a witness. It'd have to be very serious for me not to feel very uncomfortable. That's part of what makes a cops job hard, they have to be prepared that people don't like divulging a whole bunch of stuff to the law. There might be some ripple effect that bites even an innocent person in the ass.
0 likes@Toby Nixon that makes no sense, when they have no evidence they are very careful, the person can stop talking at any time and ask for a lawyer. Once they already got incriminating proof they get more agressive
0 likesi have just met the nicest cops ever last week. They took my identity just to "check". I now know that they were reporting me and my father to an nature enviromental agency for fliying on our paragliders over some tree line. Yesterday i realized that we got fined with 450euros each...
1 like@sergio urquijo I went to jail when I was 22 for a dui. I was drunk as shit nearly passed out in the side yard 50 feet from the car with the keys thown in the field somewhere.. way inside the property line when the cop pulled up. I told him I was on my property.. he shined his light on the tracks in the grass and said "that's how I know you were driving..". 12 hours in the drunk tank, and 500 bucks for a lawyer to write a letter to the judge and it was dropped. This guy just got mad at me and decided I was gonna get a DUI. People get stuck with that crap. There can't be cops like that, but people can't just be free to drive hammered either.
1 likeEither that or you're a white man.
1 likeCops are nice to me
1 likeBut that's probably because I'm nice
@Samuel Ortiz same here. I some times toss in a complement or two.
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz Then you don't get out much fella. That is for damn sure. Out of the 20 or so times I have had to interact with the police, in my 50 years of life, about 3/4 of them have been officers being overly assertive to outright bullying. Verbal abuse is pretty common.
0 likesNot true for me personally
0 likes@ibyss doing the race card... smh
2 likes😂 lol so true
0 likesThis comment with the posters pic that looks like a mug shot 😂
0 likesYep! When their mad its because they don't have enough evidence to convict you! And when there nice they have all the evidence that they need.
0 likesI've been to court, judges are like this too - but for a different reason. My lawyer said the reason they are being mean is because they aren't going to send you to jail but are still trying to send a message and really make you to reflect on your actions because they know it was a mistake and not a severe crime. On the flip side, if it's just a career criminal and what they did was evil, the judges don't waste their breathe.
1 like@ibyss Im black and any cop ive ever dealt with or have been arrested by was never a prick to me or most people I know that are also POC. With 90% of cops, if you show respect and act in a calm manner, you will recieve the same treatment, too many of our people think they can disrespect cops and talk to them like assholes and get surprised when they get the same treatment and wanna cry about race....smh watch a few episodes of Live PD and see how everyone is treated equal instead of victimizing yourself, brother, elevate your thinking snd stop trying to paint yourself as a victim
2 likesikr xD. He's singing like a canary, he thinks the cops are there to help him get off the hook
0 likes@Toby Nixon From experience, I can confirm this. Angry cops will swarm you, play mind tricks (lying), and theaten you (id est "we're gonna get dogs, or a warrant"), but eventually they just have to let you go because you refuse to admit to something you didn't even do ROFL. 😹
0 likesit's funny now, but at the time it was very nerve racking even though I knew I was innocent
@Samuel Ortiz This is true xD. It's one of the worst/best parts of the experience
0 likes@West Taiwan Lol people don't get how the judicial system works.
0 likes@Professional Hater Well mom raised you right then!!! You are a model citizen if you’re polite and just yes sir no sir them. I’ve had some crappy experiences as a teen with cops calling me all types of slurs. My experience before that was positive I even had a great officer who would take our skipping school asses back to school with McDonald’s breakfast. But most recently during the lockdown I was almost ran off the road by 2 cops who wouldn’t even pull me over but sandwich me into the guardrail. One riding my tail at a slow speed (50mph, HW limit is 55) and one on my left. But I don’t hold that against all cops. Like all humans there are good ones and a s s h o l e s.
1 like@wivuyao what do you mean?
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz 😂
0 likes@WhiskeyRick literally interrogation 101 nice cops are worse than good cop/bad cop
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likes@ibyss race has nothing to do with it
0 likes@ibyss Thanks for the generalization.
0 likesThat's not true at all. Do you think cops behave like assholes to people who are innocent? What's the logic here :D
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz and youtube apparently
0 likesLol would ya like a cup of sink water w ur 25 years good sir?!
0 likes@jes nemo there’s a reason it’s called the prison industrial complex
0 likesor it means that you're white
2 likes@ibyss i was about to say that XD
1 likeMadness is Sadness tattoo 👿👹
0 likesThis seems to be the case, I noticed.
0 likesLucía Rehermann 😆
0 likesThat's not true. When I had to use lethal force in a self defense situation the cops and the detectives were very nice and sympathetic towards me.
0 likesIt’s a technique we use 🙃 it works every well getting people to admit everything lol
0 likesIf the cops want to boost your confidence and act stupid like they’re believing your story you should be more aware because they’re waiting for you to incriminate yourself.
0 likesHe got 20 years
0 likesOr you're white.
1 like@AK Ken if you pan through that is the number one comment posted........
0 likesI can definitely agree with that.
0 likes@WhiskeyRick you're looking at a joke, sir
0 likesYou arent wrong
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz on a traffic stop or you ever been up on charges?
0 likesIdk why I laughed but it felt good lol
0 likesExactly
0 likesThis guy is a timebonb.
0 likes@mychannel302 power to the people
0 likes@mychannel302 thank god
0 likesWell, they might also want to date you because you’re handsome.
1 likeSo fucking true
0 likes@Lotus8 which one?
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz .
0 likesA detective bought me a soda and a bag of chips. Two and a half years later, I was out of prison.
1 likeIt's called "massaging" when they act all nice and try to be your friend! lol
1 like@Clee Boy I'd ask for a piece of paper and a pen with them thinking I'm going to write a statement. I'd write L-A-W-Y-E-R and push it back to them. lol
0 likesits an integrating room they dont act rude they r chill so the suspect doesnt get mad or feel any type of way to not answer questions so in this room they are nice to him for a reason
0 likesLmfaooooo
0 likes@Lucía Rehermann 😂😂😂💀
0 likesAs soon as the cops starting acting nice and ask for permission to use each other’s first names... it’s over ..
0 likes😭😭😭😭😭😭
0 likesCops actually took his side and refused to charge him until public pressure mounted.
0 likesyes, if cops are being nice to you and being pals with you. be worried, because they're getting what they want out of you.
1 like@Blu Peppers in the UK, they read tyour rights which are "You do not have to say anything. But, it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence". Plenty of prosecutors have use defendants being silent and emotionless when asked about serious crimes commited against a person as an indication of their guilt on involvement.
0 likes@wivuyao when you have cops playing the good cop. you're either a saint, or youre fucked.
0 likesExactly
0 likesThe cops say they're trying to help you oh, yeah I trying to help you go to jail
0 likes@Grimshaw Grummage If I'm ever in trouble, I'll remember this wisdom you shared in your comment.
0 likesWhy
0 likes😂😂😂😂
0 likesNah man I've had cops be nice to me plenty
0 likes@Hazed When you were detained and being questioned for murder, though?
1 like@Lucía Rehermann Ha! 😂
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz can I put a couple bucks on your books...?
0 likes@michael boultinghouse gay
0 likesNever talk to cops.
0 likesLol true but also sometimes they're just glad you're respectful. We gotta appreciate the good cops if we ever want more to come.
0 likesGood observation
0 likesHahaha true, thats what ive noticed watching this channel 😂
0 likesAm I the only one who comes into these replies to see if anyone else has mentioned the very strange use of a semi colon in the original comment
0 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesNo, theyre being nice to him because he killed a black man
0 likesor you're white
1 like@Samuel Ortiz, thank you. A lot of people just need to change their behavior.
0 likes... either that or you're white.
0 likes@Sonic RoachDoggJR /Raven ur cute
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz sports and news overrule
0 likes@tony F yes there is in BOP. we had TRULINCS. a limited email service
0 likesbut I have heard there are 4 that have complete internet access but VERY HEAVILY monitored. meaning teamviewer realtime type of monitoring
That makes no sense
0 likesdidnt see that way, now that you say....
0 likesO
0 likesYeah and prolly because your giving them everything they need by telling on you self the whole time.
0 likesYeah, in my experience you don't get much conversation in the initial contact. Just a few questions to set context, and these days they're pretty brusque. If they're being buddy buddy or more than standard polite, then they're setting the scene.
0 likesNo matter how nice though, and no matter whether you're innocent or not, shut your piehole and ask for legal representation! Plenty of innocent people get locked up because they thought they were chatting to a buddy at the bar and thought that being helpful was the right thing to do as they walk into a dozen traps they didn't see coming, and incriminate themselves for a crime they didn't commit.
or ur white
0 likesThat’s one thing I’ve learned watching these. Seems if they are calm it’s cuz they already know how this is going to end...
0 likesHe'll yeah lmao
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz lmaooooo
0 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesIve been told by a family that was a long time officer, even he told me never talk to the cops, tell them they have to talk to your attorney!
1 likedang everything he said rly was used against him in a court of law
0 likeshow would we ever have known that that would happen
Truff
0 likesOr you’re about to keep your big mouth shut, but that just about never happens.
0 likesBecause they’re tryna make you slip up your words
0 likes@metalgirl 84 you white?
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz that made me laugh thank you
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz LMAO
0 likes@He's got A Motor damn straight I would
0 likesOr you're white
0 likeshow did they know I was planning on taking over the world (for legal reasons this is a joke)
0 likesi really don't think they were being deceptive early on. being white and a legal gun owner will get you a long way in a lot ofsouthern police departments. luckily this guy was on camera and they had enough time to look at the video before interrogating him to catch him in all of his lies. also lucky this didn't take place 50 years ago, or might have gone home that night.
0 likesIt’s reverse psychology. Gets them to talk to make the confession or what they want easier.
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz LOL STOP😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂💀💀💀💀
0 likesic
0 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likes@Toby Nixon like how they acted with jeff
0 likes@jes nemo wow that is so disgusting
0 likes@tony F yea man a lot of jails give the inmates tablets and shi with WiFi
0 likes@michael boultinghouse r/ihadastroke
0 likesPretty much
0 likesor you’re just white
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz comedy genius xD
0 likes@H Sharma dont start that racist crap frfr
1 likeI guess they can’t come off aggressive to get answers
0 likes@ibyss here we go again .
0 likesYep but you can cut a bunch of years off your sentence by shutting up.
0 likesCops talking to a witness: WHY DID THEY DO IT slap
0 likes@West Taiwan for real, this whole, helping the police solve a case is bogus. You can help the police with a lawyer present who can save you helping them to a wrong conviction.
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz 🤣😭😂
0 likesThat part lol and if they say "sit tight" you is not sitting tight lol
1 likeThe correct use of a semi-colon is to separate two independent clauses and not a dependent clause and an independent clause as that is what a comma is for.
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz Were you ever in suspicion of murder ?....
0 likesFacts!!
0 likesTruer words are rarely spoken
0 likes@He's got A Motor And those Americans are well aware that if they shoot an innocent person for no good reason, they’re going to jail for a long time. Just like how if someone robs a house they’re well aware that they’re breaking the law and that the house owner may have a gun to defend themselves
0 likesthat’s such a good fucking point.
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz are you white passing ?
0 likesTrue I’ve noticed that myself . Binge watching these videos 😏
0 likesbecause kindness exhibits honesty and cooperation. if they’re being rude and raising their voice they want you to fold under pressure
0 likesThe first four replies lmaooo
0 likesAin't that the truth 😂 if you're in custody & there being nice, not that I've ever been in enough trouble to find out
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz the difference is were you being questioned, at the station or in custody? That rights thing we think we have...not so much.
0 likesOr you're white. Cops are nice to you if you have just murdered people , if you're white. (Kyle Rittenhouse)
0 likesGood... its a tactic so the guy trusts them..he'll talk more when he's comfortable
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz 😂😂
0 likes@ibyss ah yes bring race into something that has nothing to do with race
1 likeLol true
0 likes@sticks andDynamite oh yeah all my personal problems like institutional racism, police brutality, white supremacy, and american imperialism
0 likes@ibyss Then you haven't dealt with them.
0 likesOr they'll buy you Burger King.
0 likes@In Out Door if you're white
0 likesFucking Right lol
0 likesThat’s not true EVEN A LITTLE BIT,
0 likesCops & detectives are 2 VERY diff things also.
@Samuel Ortiz u a criminal just when u say every cop u talk to ?
0 likesthe little kid whos parents just died in a car crash 😥
0 likes@West Taiwan specially if you are innocent
0 likesI was blind sided by their niceness after binge watching a few vids in this channel... Now it all makes sense.
0 likesThey let him go that same day.
0 likes@West Taiwan get a lawyer for everything, even minor traffic tickets fight them use services such as off the record
0 likes@Toby Nixon likes the video where they wrongly arrest some black dude for a jewelry store robbery. And the detectives were lying to him and this fucking Chad of a man gave off the most dominant body language and laughing in the cops face lol
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz were you being interrogated for possible murder or getting a traffic ticket?
0 likesWell... most people are nice to you if they need something. And officers rarely want something more than confession from right man
0 likes💯, when the police r being belligerent they’re trying to get u to give them a case
0 likesGood call...
0 likes@Lucía Rehermann 🤣🤣🤣
0 likes@metalgirl 84 some are just guys doing a job. Some are ex soldiers with ptsd that just want to kill again
0 likesyeah if you’re white
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz Nevermind, I don’t have cable. I’m coming in so make a space for me
0 likesWell, that’s not ALWAYS true. Sometimes cops can be nice when gather witness testimony. But if they read your rights to remain silent and then are acting nice to you, yeah you are in trouble.
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz nice
0 likes@Tais's Tea who physically attacked him
0 likesEvery cop in uk I've spoke to are never nice ,especially wen they know one is innocent , but then frame one
0 likesI'm a Christian and my 18 year old is going to be a PA 👍🏻
0 likes@Lucía Rehermann that comeback 😂😂😂
0 likesFalse, but sounds like someone has done some illegal shit and is waiting for the cops to arrive
0 likes@West Taiwan No damn doubt👍👊
0 likes@Lucía Rehermann lol😂😂
0 likesnah they’re just being nice cause he’s WHITE
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz 😂😂😂😂😂😂
0 likesthat's an affirmative
0 likes@sky the weeb There's a great video on youtube of law professor James Duane giving a speech explaining why you should never give consent to any police interrogation or interviews without an attorney present, under any circumstances.
0 likesFalse
0 likesLiar
0 likesShit I can see her from here
0 likesThere’s tons of spots you killed a father for nothing
0 likesDude should have got a lawyer right off the bat
0 likes@Tais's Tea for murdering a violent bully* they're both perps
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz What are you in for?
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz lol you’re a cop huh?
0 likesYes sir, you nailed it
0 likesFacts! The nicer they are the longer you are going away!!!
0 likesfairly reliable rule of thumb
0 likes@Prettysag510 have you never seen any of jcs's vids before??? they are being nice as an interrogation tactic. be ignorant and racist though, im not gonna stop you.
0 likesIf you’re lawyer is trying to argue that the surveillance footage is grainy you’re most likely going to jail for a long time.
0 likesOr its a way of getting info
0 likesOf course theres the force. like raising your voice, getting 'hostile'
Then I think being nice is sometimes a tactic. Make them feel safe, make them trus tyou and such.
@Kevin Alrigieri what I’ve learned, get a lawyer
0 likesdude should have had a lawyer. never talk to police - they are there to pin crimes on people if possible. thats the sad truth - but they need to do that dirty job, coz the weak need to be protected from bad guys (like the big guy assaulting that old man from behind no less).
0 likesLol
0 likes@Lucía Rehermann 🤣💦🤣
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz 🤣💦🤣
0 likes@Battalon 🤔
0 likesCops are always nice to me! I should be worried!
0 likes@*username* purple. At least a bit of me is
0 likes@He's got A Motor that's ignorant. I carry a gun and I hope I never have to use it on any living being.
0 likesNever talk to the cops in this situation. Always ask for lawyer for the get go.
0 likesany last words, my dear and beatiful sir?
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz lol :)
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz LMFAOOO you funny 😭
0 likes@michael boultinghouse and in the event they do not accept that answer you may also provide an alternate answer - ATTORNEY
0 likesOr your white
0 likesThe sheriff's office refused to prosecute him, though. Because in America, shooting people over a parking lot argument is seem as perfectly acceptable by some people.
0 likesHe used excessive force.
0 likesViolence is not a solution.
Always video record confrontations.
Holy shit, facts.
0 likes@Toby Nixon STEPHEEEEEENNNN
0 likes@West Taiwan this. If you are in an interrogation room at all, you are a suspect.
0 likes@jes nemo Really? Because the people I know have smart phones in there. Doesn’t seem to matter how much their access is limited.
0 likes@Thomas Flores it really was a simple question, YOU are making it into a bigger deal. Why does everyone hate POCs bringing up race when it is the reality of our existence, yall say that because you don’t live in. We see it in everything and yes, 90% of the time we are treated differently because of it. It’s like you guys just refuse to see facts
0 likes@*username* 90% is not a real number. You see things the way you want to see them. Everyone does. “Life’s what you make it” I believe is the saying. I know plenty of PoC that would say that their race has not been an obstacle in their life of any kind, and another, in the same community that cannot even talk to some PoC because they don’t feel like they understand their struggles. Doesn’t seem to matter that they’re both black. Their experiences were completely different. That’s why you can’t say “the reality of OUR existence” there is no OUR, there is no shared experience other than the one you create by making a series of comparisons. But that’s not reality. Reality is there are a million things at play that create just one persons positive or negative experiences, to pile them all up and throw a big race blanket over them like that’s the simple explanation that outweighs all the other million factors at play, is shortsighted, and small minded. Every race doesn’t have its own separate cookie cutter life that ever member of that group gets the same cookie.
0 likes@Thomas Flores we don’t throw a race blanket over everything, there are times when it is just obvious a person he racial biases. It’s kind of disgusting that you, as a none poc would try and undermine and experience you have never been through. I wouldn’t talk about how easy or difficult it is for a white man because I’ve never lived their life. There are certain instances were a spade is just a fucking spade man. Don’t come here and try act like institutional racism isn’t a thing, yes racism has improved and isn’t overt especially in any kind of legal case. It is a FACT (proven so argue with yourself) that black men are prosecuted 4 times the amount of white men. I live in the uk
0 likesYou have a cute smile, but yes I agree with your statement.
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz and YouTube?
0 likes@West Taiwan that’s great advice though, because the most time you need one is when you’re innocent.
0 likes@Infernal Gate I made minute rice under a minute
0 likes@Blake Pls bring chips we ran out yesterday
0 likesThis is not the proper use of a semicolon. Both clauses need to be independent.
0 likesYessir definitely because they’re satisfied with the evidence
0 likesI never had a nice cop when getting a ticket so far.
0 likes@West Taiwan facts
0 likestrue
0 likes@michael boultinghouse your talk is exactly why this nation is screwed
0 likes@Samuel Ortiz 💀
0 likesI guess our school police officers hate me.
0 likesAre you people serious!? Listen, I am liberal for the most part. I do think everyone has the right to own a gun tho. But wrong is wrong.
1 likeThe black guy assaulted the guy first! The white guy was just talking and didn't do anything illegal.
You can say he was annoying or whatever but he didn't assault anyone. It's a free country. First ammendment. Say what you want but when you put your hands on someone and push them that hard to the ground, I no longer view you as the victim but the aggressor.
The black guy only retreated after he saw the gun pointed at him. It didn't matter if he was walking back at that point. The crime of assault was already committed. I am tired of my fellow liberals defending the suspects and victims of police violence no matter what they do. Resisting arrest, punching and cop, driving away, etc.
No one deserves to die for it but obey the law! Don't assault someone. Period. I dont feel bad for the guy who got killed in this situation at all. His girlfriend said, do I need to go get my man. They were the aggressors. The white guy was just annoying and nosy. But they were parked in the handicap parking spot which is also ILLEGAL!!!
@Milky Way so you think a push, deserves a gunshot? Not very liberal of you. Yes, don't push people. But also don't escalate the level of violence by shooting someone! Being a jerk isn't illegal. Murder is. Even though he was guilty of assault, he wouldn't have been give a death penalty, like he basically got. The other guy killed him, and was basically fine himself! The fact that they all were aggressors is not the point! You can get up from a shove, we can't bring back a life!
0 likes@Sarah Abramova So you think we have a 2nd amendment just to use against people who threaten us who also have a gun?
0 likesSo if someone breaks into your home in the middle of the night and you don't know if they have a gun, what should you do...take a chance and pat them down first or ask them if they have a gun before opening fire??
Real life situations happen with 3 seconds like this incident. That wasn't a light push. He took a running start and pushed as hard as he could AND HE WALKED UP ON HIM, PULLED UP HIS SHORTS READY TO FIGHT ONCE HE GOT BACK UP....THAT IS THE PART THAT JUSTIFIES USING THE GUN.
I am so tired of others liberal defending everything the "victim" does. Literally everything. It is just as bad as Trump and his supporters never admitting fault.
The mother and father should have known better! They acted like that in front of their kids. Call the cops. Use your words. Never get violent. And never park in a handicap spot especially when you got so many other spots right next to it!!! Smh. Those were not good law abiding citizens so stop it.
@Milky Way you're using strawman arguments.
0 likes@Milky Way nothing indicated he would continue, you saw the video.
0 likes@Milky Way if two people are fighting, and one has a weapon, guess who's more dangerous? If he just held it, it would've been fine. But he shot.
0 likes@Milky Way also, logically speaking, if the black guy was aiming to kill, then why just push him if he did have a gun, stretching your already ridiculous hypothetical scenario? This guy had a gun, and it was his opening move.
0 likes@Milky Way and it's not defending the victim at all. It's berating the killer. Learn the difference.
0 likes@Milky Way literally everyone did something wrong, but only one guy is going to jail because that's the one that lived.
0 likes@Milky Way there is a difference between defending a person, and saying someone took things too far. THAT'S what we're saying. Grow up if you don't understand that. We aren't grade schoolers. We're adults, it's time for you to learn some nuance.
0 likes.
0 likes.
0 likes.
0 likes.
0 likes,
0 likes,
0 likes.
0 likes,
0 likes,,
0 likes,,,
0 likesM
0 likesA
0 likesX
0 likesA
0 likesA
0 likesT
0 likesE
0 likesL
0 likesM
0 likesT
0 likesE
0 likesA
0 likesE
0 likesD
0 likesB
0 likesO
0 likesS
0 likesL
0 likesE
0 likesE
0 likesP
0 likesT
0 likesB
0 likesY
0 likesE
0 likesCause there is no argument to be had
0 likesAmen
0 likesLol true
0 likesWell it's either your a suspect or your not
0 likestrue statement. I’ve been interrogated before for something I didn’t do and I think they knew this but still tried to see what was up with me and oh boy were they rude.
0 likes@BaDaBoom lmao thank you. You’re hilarious.
0 likesin israel it"s the other way around .... hahahahaha our police force detectives have alot to learn from you guys
0 likesOr you’re white.
0 likesThat's highest number of likes I have ever seen on a comment
1 likeLol I mean, interrogators*. Cops are always friendly
0 likesYup... I would go to the bathroom in my pants on purpose and ask for 2 lawyers
0 likesAt 20:25 is probably the most important point. He provoked a confrontation know he was protected without consideration for the other party”. This is the kind of guy I hate. He wanted to use his weapon he wanted to shoot someone that was trying to look after his loved one. Regardless of the parking situation
0 likes@ibyss u just pissed off a lot of white folks lmao
0 likesor ur just white
1 like@Properly Gaming I was in a fairly bad situation once and I’ve could have gotten up to 10 year in prison and a 5000€ fine but the cops were genuinely nice to me they drove me back home gave me tea and talked to me for a bit I ended up getting everything sorted and I didn’t get a criminal record and I’m not planning to ever get one
0 likesAnd if they tell you that you can call them George you are facing a minimum 11 years for sure!
0 likesYuo
0 likesthey're only being nice to somebody bcuz they want and need information now if you notice they will be nice as long as they're getting what they want if they don't they get really pissed off. I always believe keeping your mouth shut and lawyering up is your best bet.even tho you won't get treated very nice and you're probly going to jail it's the best choice in the long run.
0 likesOne time a guy broke into my house and I heard him out there for awhile so I had my gun drawn and was hiding behind my counter and when I heard the window break I was screaming get out or I’m gunna shoot you and he ran away so fast and the amount of relief I felt not having to do anything. I couldn’t imagine wanting that kind of confrontation
4 likesWhy do some aholes insist on policing everybody else? If you’re that upset with her being parked there, either call the actual cops about it or just chill out and mind your own business.
6 likes“Haven’t been hit like that since I was in my 20s”
169 likesWe have found the problem, dude should’ve been getting his ass kicked for years.
Replies (6)
This is the only comment that makes sense. Our world needs more people like you
4 likeslmao
1 likeThat sentence doesn't imply he hasn't been getting hit over the years. He just hasn't experienced a hit like that since his 20s.
0 likesDon't blame him for drawing his weapon if that's the case.
Nice attempt on the manipulation of his words though
@Rob Oc cry me a river
1 like@Victoria Pitts Nah I'm good hunny, I'll stick to correcting people's atrocious reading/listening comprehension
0 likesGreat comment!
0 likesGreat video, interesting to basically hear a man say, "I've never been in a fight before and I thought a man was going to kill me because I've never been pushed before"
33 likesdefinitely not a justifiable homicide, when he pointed his gun at the attacker, there was no need for pulling the trigger as the attacker showed the sign of withdrawing
2561 likesReplies (64)
Yep just anger
125 likesAttacker or defender
5 likes@Independence Boyd in this case looks like he is not the attacker but he clearly went beyond the self-defense and when he said "this is my shop" and so on that may prove he wanted to be in charge, have control etc. and made him going beyond the self-defense, but there is always a doubt
29 likes@Sjwaria Law I agree
0 likes@Os ikr. It’s insane how stupid some of these comments can get.
79 likes@Os why is that?
1 like@submosphere u r right
1 like@Adam Raciecki I really hope you aren’t serious
29 likesThat is a tough one. You can not pull a weapon unless you are you in fear of your life. And you should pull out or discharge a weapon to scare someone or let off "warning shots". No brandishing.
8 likes@Louis McCaII "unless you are you in fear of your life", he was in fear of his life so he pulled a weapon, how about this?
5 likes@Adam Raciecki you completely missed the point. You’re not supposed to point a weapon unless you intend to shoot. In his mind, he could be correct in his immediate reaction. My point is not the end result of the case, my point is you should never take a weapon out unless you plan to use it. What happens in the split second between the weapon being removed from its holster and being fired is the debatable portion but leading up to that it’s reasonable to believe you should not simply point a gun unless you intend to use it to stop one’s behavior.
4 likes@Louis McCaII ok, I understand but let me flip a bit the assessment of the situation here, do you think removing a gun from the holster (but not firing it) would've been justified in that man's case?
4 likes@Adam Raciecki Yes. Unique state statutes aside, I do not see the issue with defending yourself in a tense scenario where you are blindsided, only to see a younger and stronger aggressor. The issue here is pointing the weapon as that would mean a greater level of threat is indeed in front of you. Pointing, coupled with hesitation makes one wonder about the nature of the threat as this was not necessary a split second decision. Basic legal counsel would have had a profound outcome.
14 likes@Louis McCaII Thank you very much for the explanation.
3 likes@rudy falcone Conflating two issues. No one is saying the guy was right, but it’s not completely unreasonable and the hardest thing to prove is intent so you have no idea what could’ve happened in that scenario.
8 likes@rudy falcone I'm glad too
0 likes@submosphere That's a lie. The video clearly shows the attacker still moving forward after this guy got pushed on the ground. He was never "turning to go back to the store". He only started moving back when he realized he was armed. Which makes his testimony actually true ; the attacker did move forward while he was picking up his gun, he just clearly backed out afterwards
10 likes@V Vey I'm not going to argue with dumb people, the argument will never end if I do.
10 likes@Adam Raciecki you don't shoot people "just in case" when they display no life threatening qualities. If you get pushed tell your ego and small pp to calm down and not pull a trigger, maybe hit the gym more so you don't go flying like this man did.
19 likes@JordanDrukqsz correct
1 like@Shane Allder u r right
0 likes@ben colbert exactly
0 likesyou say, safely behind your monitor
1 like@ben colbert 10 ft is literally less then 2 seconds worth of movement
4 likes@Skup Ire average human reaction time is about .3 seconds. He already had his weapon out and aimed. He was in that position for 2.5 seconds before he decided to fire.
7 likes@Skup Ire this also wasn't some wild wild west quick draw match. The other guy did not have a weapon present, so there was no imminent danger after his weapon was out and in position to fire.
5 likes@ben colbert damn, a whole 2.5 seconds. and that reaction time your quoting is superhuman, maybe if you count flinching with absolutely no conscious reaction id believe it was twice that
3 likes@Skup Ire well, all of us here are trying to judge this in the most objective way sitting behind monitors
1 likewhat a detective you are lol
0 likesAdam Raciecki there was no reason in the first place for him to be doing what he did , period.
0 likes@KristapsJJ no, it would've been a total havoc, without jobs, no income from taxes, police as paid killers, mass killings, rapes and suicides, society collapsed
1 like@Adam Raciecki "so he shot him just in case" Yeah that line of argument is manslaughter at best, murder at worst.
5 likes@Os I really hope he was joking... oh wait, he was
0 likes@Adam Raciecki still doesn’t justify it. I hope you don’t have a gun. And I’m not a liberal. You can just keep your gun on him... not pull the trigger as he’s backing up
1 like@Louis McCaII I don’t think it’s legal to even fire a warning shot as you don’t know where that bullet will labd
1 like@Jeremy Caulk there are no such things as warning shots. So that option is off the table, leaving doing nothing but stating you are alarmed or shooting to kill.
2 likes@Jeremy Caulk true, I don't have gun, and u r right
0 likesYou say that with hindsight and not in the adrenaline rush “heat of the moment” that this man must have been feeling.
1 like@JordanDrukqsz no amount of training in the gym would prepare you for getting blindsided like that. Your ass is going on the ground I don’t care who you are
0 likes@JordanDrukqsz or maybe people shouldn't assault other people. You think the guy shoves him to the ground if he knew he had a gun on him? I dont think so.
2 likesYeah withdrawing to get a glock in his glove compartment lmfao gtfo
1 like@Adam Raciecki Lol yeah cuz he would definitely walk away to just come back and grab his gun 😐
2 likes@Adam Raciecki PLEASE TELL ME YOU ARE JOKING
2 likesShouldn't have attacked him in the first place play stupid games win stupid prizes he's dead other guys in prison only real loser in this is the man's kid
1 likeI wonder if you apply that same mind set to government agents
0 likesty sherlock
0 likesWhat justified the aggressor to assault the victim in the first place? The most common cause of death in street assaults is hitting your head on the concrete when the criminal knocks you down. What is wrong with shooting someone who just tried to murder you?
1 like@GrvYrdRose - if you can risk killing someone for what they're saying, what can you do to someone if they risk killing you?
0 likesIf he just wouldve kept a cool head then the other guy wouldve went to jail. Wouldve gotten right back out, but still, would have definitely been arrested. More black people these days should watch this. Maybe they'll learn to not go straight to violence no matter how much they hate white people
1 like@submosphere He was still facing him, as he got shot in the chest, derp. You don't know what he was saying. Could have been threatening him, anything... best to get a lawyer regardless
1 likeHe was turning around though and you could clearly see that. "You don't know what he was saying." Well if he said something really bad that made him shoot, wouldn't you think that Micheal would have told us what he said? He wouldn't keep his mouth shut about it because that would help his case.
0 likes@Adam Raciecki yeah, guns are mostly used for intimidation, if he attacked him again it would've been justified, but the situation is almost like, you step on my toe, i break both your hands. its a good thing he got time, cause that shot wasn't in self-defense
1 like@submosphere incorrect, before he pulled the weapon he was approaching him on the ground, halfway through the pull he stops and starts to back up.
0 likes@GrvYrdRose manslaughter not murder
0 likes@75ur15 Even if that is true, It still does not make sense why he shot him. He was backing up, therefore why take the shot?
0 likes@Adam Raciecki During his interrogation, he never gave any indication of being someone who genuinely feared for his life.
0 likes@Sans yeah but I'm a bit smashed now so who cares...
0 likesAttacker. Mans was pushed to the ground for shouting at a woman at a car for little to no reason. Pulled a gun and pulled the trigger on a man who pushed him. That's not eye for an eye. That's eye for a head
1 like@Adam Raciecki bigot
0 likes@Christopher Darden u mean, i'm bigot?
0 likesWhy is nobody mentioning the fact that the victim parked in a handicap spot?
0 likesListen, I'm not justifying him being shot but I hate arrogant people who just think they can do anything they want - with an "IDGAF" attitude, such as parking in a disabled parking spot when they're not disabled. These types of people are scumbags.
He did not deserve to be shot over this but unfortunately, he crossed somebody who was a little more arrogant than him that day and paid the consequences.
Sorry but both the suspect and the victim can kiss my *
@pistol pete who cares what you think
0 likes@Sam Donohoe he saw a man swearing and yelling at his wife. i would push the guy too.
0 likes@customsongmaker the man didnt try to kill michael. he tried to get him away from his wife, whomst he was yelling and swearing at over a PARKING SPOT. and he landed on his elbow. he then waited 2.5 seconds on the ground w his gun out whilst the victim was backing up. Oh and, just to trigger you some more, this was definitely a racially motivated killing. This case would not have existed if the woman and kids in the car were white, instead of black.
0 likesI always stay in my lane and mind my own business. I let people do what they want to do and I do not interfere with others. This guy could have avoided this whole situation by just leaving these people alone 🤷🏼♀️
41 likesReplies (6)
Or they shouldn't have illegally parked in a handicapped parking spot. The murder is wrong, but as a person who was in a wheelchair 19 years and now walks with crutches all the time I always applaud people berating people who aren't handicapped parking at these spots. He obviously took it too far. But not interfering wouldn't have prevented this any more than not parking there in the first place would have.
8 likes@alldamnnamesaretaken It was not a legal handicapped spot. It wasn't approved by the town. It didn't have the proper signage. The car was not illegally parked. Drejkas space was though
11 likes@alldamnnamesaretaken How would him not arguing with the woman have caused her boyfriend to attack him?
2 likes@alldamnnamesaretaken idiotic take. if you’re not law enforcement then don’t act like it. PERIOD. report the issue and go about your day, causing a scene and making an ass of yourself is never the way to go. it’s just a great way to make sure everyone loses.
2 likes@Victoria Pitts why are you ableist
0 likes@alldamnnamesaretaken apart from the fact that there is literally parking space all around them, the girl was literally in the car, if a handicapped person needed the space I'm sure she would've moved, either way the dude literally parked illegally taking even more space
0 likesGrowing up a person like this was referred to by my parents as a "trouble maker" his interrogation proves that to be true. I feel for the victims family and friends.
29 likes30:52 - "The feet said he was coming towards me, and so did the hips!"
71 likesDamn, the guy trusted Shakira with this one.
Replies (3)
Dude💀😭😂😂
1 likeBro I had the same thought when he said hips 😂 you know they don’t lie!
0 likesHeey, hips don't lie...
0 likesThat's the second case on the channel which was caused simply because stupid people had an access to the gun. As someone who weren't raised in USA where it seems people are drilled "more guns = more freedom" from the young age, it's just sad.
18 likesReplies (1)
More guns generally means less freedom, because it allows enforcers to equip themselves dramatically better. It’s why the Governor of Colorado got away with deploying tanks and surface to air missiles to break up a protest back in 2015. You probably didn’t even hear about that because it struck everyone as reasonable given some of the most prominent protesters were actual combat veterans and theoretically could have been armed (they weren’t).
1 likeThis guy builds a better case against himself than any lawyer could.
5423 likesReplies (36)
The smug Megumin pfp makes this comment a dozen times funnier
63 likes@Joe Blow Why Is Every Word In Your Comment Capitalised
15 likes@Error 404 Titlecase, I Suppose.
4 likesYet got 100$ bond, the system fails and fails
5 likesYea actually absurd how big a ditch he dug just through acting pretentious. He's such a police wannabe it's insane. But the truth is just because you patrol and have a gun does not give you the right to use it...my god every time he said "negative" instead of "no" I vommed in my mouth a little lol
36 likes@Eric Borczuk This guy talks so arrogant, as you said with the negatives and the tough guy act, it makes me angry af, hes a perfect example of bad wannabe's.
11 likes@Greg Robinette yeah that dude wanted to say I’m so smart I really know what’s going on so bad that he ignores the fact that your comment is completely unrelated regardless of whether what he said is not is true there are still average people in society doing shit like this and getting arrested unless his point is anyone who does those crimes is in power which is pretty dumb.
1 like@xXfunk36Xx your comment makes zero sense, I cant understand a thing your saying
5 likesHe really thought the cops would be on his side.
8 likesI feel like he’s one of those guys who loves to play cop games and be the “good guy”
9 likes@Greg Robinette Yeah, he totally makes me want to neutralize him with a force multiplier.
2 likes@GrimeBot 3000 same
0 likesI see no justification in this shooting. He may or may not have been hit again , but I seriously doubt that he even thought his life was in danger .
6 likesThe funny thing is a cop friend of mine has said interrogations now are all about letting the suspect talk. Let them talk long enough they’ll close the cell doors on themselves.
2 likes@Greg RobinetteA racist may get some justification, but they would have to invert theirselves into it because I don't see anything racial in this at all .
0 likes@Randy Bonner well its a white guy killing a black guy, racists will defend Drejka for the sole reason of "a black life was erased", Drejka is probably not a racist, he talks like the avg white supremacist, they are all soldier wannabes, but I mostly think Drejka acted on the delusion that he owned the parking spot
4 likes@Eric Borczuk agree...this guy thought he was in the lords army or sum shit.
1 likeHe shouldve been given a medal... not jail time.
0 likes@ПIGΉƬMΛЯΣ hope youre joking, he commited a real crime
0 likes@Greg Robinette 100 dollars. Are you on crack🤣 a 100000 dollar bond equals out to 10000
0 likes@Robert Trujillo I'm not on crack, Idek why I said that, mustve meant 100,000
0 likesWouldn't it be a prosecutor or attorney?
1 likeNot sarcasm, seriously asking.
@Tony from my minimal understanding, lawyer and attorney are the same, and prosecuter is the lawyer/attorney that is on the suing party.
0 likesOr maybe lawyer and attorney means defense only
@Greg Robinette thank you.
1 like@Tony I'm talking about the suspect. He creates all the evidence for the prosecution and they don't even need to dig for anything. He pretty much handed everything to them. They could probably just show them the video of the incident and the interrogation and they would have had a guilty verdict.
1 likeSorry for the confusion. I just realized that this guy is very vague and it could also be referring to the interrogator.
It's hilarious he was his own prosecutor
2 likes@GrimeBot 3000 nice 🤣
0 likesThe sole purpose of ofc rehashing the incident @14:45 is to begin creating contradictions by inserting the police officers language to incriminate the defendant. Not the defendants words but a variation that he can further manipulate to the police officers criminal narrative. The product created with this technique is not the defendants statement but the Ofc narrative of a crime.
0 likesNever ever ever ever speak to a police officer. He is 100% of the time is going to lie. Don't speak at all let your lawyer speak at trial.
This isn't good police work this is scientifically designed deception. Carried out by a chud police officer patting himself on the back.
@Kaitensatsuma the inability to correctly articulate sentences put more people in prison than any police officer. The only thing this guy is guilty of is letting that officer feed him the cops narrative. Never ever speak to any government official even if you think you can help.
0 likes@Hairy Balling They didn't need him to contradict himself, there's video proof of him lying. His first recollection before he was asked to repeat it was a lie too, he insisted that his victim was about to "start finish what he started" when it shows him backing off once the gun is in view.
0 likesThen he started embellishing to make it sound like he was about to get jumped on by someone standing above him, "ready to charge".
The best or possibly worst part? When asked if he could change anything, anything at all there wasn't even a brief moment of "Well, I suppose I wish he hadn't died" coming across his mental state.
@Kaitensatsuma My dear, it is understandable that you believe this case turns on "His first recollection" which are your are your own words.
0 likesThe defendant, incorrect or not is not the question. State of mind is determined by "his perception" not yours or a video tape. It is the state of mind of the defendant or more correctly stated, weather he has a guilty mind. That is what is punished in the US.
Is it reasonable for the defendant to react with his defense training to attacked from behind and violently knocked to the ground in a vulnerable position?
Well? Try attacking a police officer from behind and knocking him to the ground and see if he doesn't employ the exact same defense.
Was he civilly wrong? He could be possibly liable in civil court, criminally he isn't guilty because he believed what he recounted as his first impression. Catching someone wrong in their memory of events is not a crime or evidence of a crime.
@Hairy Balling No sweetie, I don't believe that the case turned on his first recollection, that was something that you entirely implied on your own when you insisted that the, let's see, that the guy was guilty of "Letting the cops feed him his narrative" and that "The sole purpose of ofc rehashing the incident @14:45 is to begin creating contradictions by inserting the police officers language to incriminate the defendant." - Your words, not mine.
0 likesNow, that's an adorable misunderstanding of what happened in that video, it's so cute it's honestly something a little child would think of, like, again, they didn't have video evidence and reasonable case to make if the prosecutor wanted to take it up. I could just pinch your little cheeks.
Was this man a police officer? No
Did anyone argue that he didn't get assaulted? Also no
Did he, absent of any immediate threat to his life, use excessive force? Yes
Did he admit - with little additional questioning - that he was in a rational state of mind, capable of rational decision making? Also yes.
And that's the way the cookie crumbles! Did I argue that you are wrong about not talking to police? Of course not, the first thing he should have asked for was a lawyer.
Did he think he was enough of a Chad Pro-Police CCP license holder who read the USCCA website front to back? Seems like it.
Sweetheart
Poor guy. He thought he was only picking on a defenseless mother and her kids.
0 likes@Felipe Valencia by picking you mean objecting to their illegal activity in his community?
0 likesI checked the timer....this guy : https://youtu.be/hQAC2pPVu88 lasts exactly 7 seconds before incriminating himself in "to catch a predator" with Chris Hansen
0 likeshe goes on to confess crime after crime after crime, because "[he] has a compulsion for young girls"
too funny!
Especially with all that bullshit his lawyer said about the camera quality, as if it was scratched and burned
0 likes11:01
35 likesThis breakdown about how and why we react when asked questions was phenomenal.
He's trying to talk like a cop because he thinks the law is on his side. That's so pathetic. And the fact that he fucking killed a guy who just pushed him and made him scrape his arm is just so so scary.
18 likesHe had zero remorse during the whole interview / interrogation. Unbelievable. He better not step on the wrong line in the prison in next 20 years othwrwise someone may do the " self-defence" that he done to someone. Enjoy the prison. You deserve every bit of it
21 likesReplies (1)
it was reported he got beaten by a few black inmates and they stated "thats for your victim!" when the family heard, they said they never made a deal with anyone to hurt him. so yeah, hes walking around with a target on his back
8 likesWatching the victim take steps back… absolutely breaks my heart
75 likesReplies (6)
watch the dead guy push the shooter first,break my heart too.
8 likes@舜帝 are you saying what the shooter did was justified?
8 likes@舜帝 so you think the shooter was in the right?
2 likes@Jules I think the Russia is wrong,for the same reason.
0 likes@Biaru i hear you, but there is a difference between pushing someone, and taking their life.. should he have full on shoved him? No. Does that in anyway justify the shooter for taking a man’s life? Absolutely not.
5 likes@舜帝 We learn from as young as kindergarten what the appropriate response to physical provocation is.
2 likesHint; it's not murder.
It's amazing watching someone humblebrag themself into a conviction.
20695 likesReplies (90)
The Convict humblebrag.
442 likesWtf is humblebrag
108 likes@Mark Acklin It's when someone subtly brags about what they did and tries to sound humble while doing so.
945 likesHumblebrag!!! 🤣
145 likes@ProfessorBAG quite funny, I'm from U.K so that's unusual to me
142 likes...when someone humblebrags HIMSELF...
49 likesThe Humblebrag Conviction
72 likesAbsolutely! Like Micheal "fluid motion" Dunn. The definition of humblebrag fs.
130 likesCommunity refrence, shots!
9 likes@Mark Acklin I dont think that my comments are any good, but I get a lot of likes.
27 likesAmy Warren ugh, I just watched that one again last night. I can’t get over the fact that these two both referred to themselves as “the real victim here!” (This one by proxy).
40 likesDunn did so repeatedly... in a phone call that he knows is being recorded, yet somehow he can’t help but keep saying shit like “they’re violent” and that he’s glad he’s not in a cell with “those animals”... you can just hear the grin in his voice. It’s sickening.
Stop! You made me spit my gum into my facemask! Hahah
14 likesYESSS perfect wording.. I think this is what makes him being charged and convicted even more satisfying
27 likesI knew from a few minutes in that he would be a serial pest thinking he's a police officer. I wonder how many times he's called the police on his neighbours.
48 likesHahaha never heard this term before.....
5 likesLove it
... Exactly!! He was also hope the 'we're all white here' card would help him also. Sad man.
45 likesLove to see it 😁
2 likesLOL "Humblebrag" sounds like a character from Hogwarts!
21 likesBuddy ass thought he was justified going home to some ass. Oh yeah officer I took one shot as he stepped to me and I just feared for my life but I didn't over do it I only shot once. Then footage literally show us dude pushed him, stood there, seen the gun and backed up instantly, never even came forward. This guy just got the biggest goofy of the year award
14 likesTravis Brazil. Haha. That’s a weird surname! It’s cool though! Where is it from?
2 likes@Walker 50:51
4 likes@Sergio I got it from my dad but I'm not sure where it originated.
4 likesThe Humblebrag Conviction is actually the working title of John Grisham's next legal thriller. Looks like another Hollywood adaptation is in the works for ol Johnny boy.
10 likes@ProfessorBAG Do you think he'd have beat this if he just had shut up and got a lawyer?
5 likesHe talked himself into a murder charge
5 likesLmao humblebragged into conviction 🤣😂
3 likes@Mark Acklin im english. its a reddit thing. not an america thing.
5 likes@Special Investigations Unit why do you sound like on of them teens that watched that bloke drowned one of them kept saying "Buddy ass" what part of murcia uses that.
0 likesA humblebrag? That's an oxymoron if I've ever heard one
2 likesAmazing comment
2 likes@Dave Mojarra 2
1 likeThey obviously dont really know you.
@Mark Acklin I’m from America and I’ve never heard that either
1 like@Mark Acklin tryna sound like he’s a hero but ended up convicting himself
6 likes😂
2 likesI haven’t even watched video yet and read this with no context. I chuckled to my self and now am ready to enjoy and laugh at what I’m about to watch. Update after the video to come.
5 likesShould have got a lawyer before you said a word
3 likes@Mark Acklin a example like "i was walking to the store and i seen someone litter. So i rightfully removed the trash from the sidewalk and put it into the can. Its what anybody would do!" Of humble vrag
4 likesI know rig
2 likes@Nidoking Ōtsutsuki the expression humble brag surely predates reddit, probably started in the US tho.
4 likesSo satisfying I need a cigarette after watching
3 likesSo that's different from an explainabrag
3 likesOr a compasault !
@Simon ? wtf ?
1 likeLmao for real I was shouting shit uuuuup. Stop talking
2 likesLmao I hate humblebragging
4 likesSaw this comment at the top before the adverts even stopped playing, and it’s made me very excited to see the video... but in a way I think is ultimately going to upset me
4 likesEdit: 3 mins in and I already know my initial reaction to this comment was wrong. This is just disgusting
I'm held in high regard in my city for my unwavering modesty.
5 likesTravis Breazile *themselves / *himself
2 likes@Mark Acklin read a damn book
0 likesright
2 likesbest comment
2 likesWould the conviction been different if he said he was in fear of his life and shivering with his head down in the interview crying?
2 likes@honchoryanc I think it might have been different if he shut his mouth and asked for a lawyer.
6 likesHe’s alive so hahahahaa he gets to live and the loser than shoved him is in the ground
3 likesDon't talk to cops!!! Get a lawyer.
3 likesBahaha yes 🤣🤣🤣
2 likesCheck every rapper ever lol
1 likeso what I’m getting from this is......you killed an innocent man because YOU weren’t minding your business.......
5 likesNot very humble lol
2 likes@Amy Warren I don't want to cause u guys sleepless nights lol
2 likeshahaha i like that term Travis "humblenbrag" nice one ^^
1 likeMy ex humble bragged about his bank account when he started making $100/hr and then laughed at my broken down car. I hope he has a good time sleeping with his money at night.
4 likes@Mark Acklin it's unusual everywhere. Lol
1 likeThis comment is very accurate
1 likeWhat does that mean Travis?
1 like@Tania Haeussler i think it was just referring to the actual thing that was funny, not his gender or anything
4 likes@fae no biggie 😉
3 likes@Darryl Hart Humblebrag is the act of trying to act humble while subtly bragging at the same time.
3 likesHumblebrag sounds like a character that should have been in Harry Potter.
3 likes"themself" Please learn English lmao.
0 likes@Anonymous user
4 likesthem·self
/T͟Həmˈself,T͟Hemˈself/
used instead of “himself” or “herself” to refer to a person of unspecified sex.
It's proper English, my dude.
@CikisHelyzet What are you on about?
0 likes@Amanda Sack I never heard of humblebug in my life. New Yorker all my life. We don't use this term.
2 likes@Jason James I lived in NY my whole life. Never heard of humberbug. 🤯
2 likes@Mark Acklin I've never heard anyone say "buddy ass" as a phrase before.
1 likeFunniest part is knowing the cops are gonna turn from friends to his worst enemy but he has no idea at all so he’s talking away half way through he’s getting defensive lol
2 likesI'm just amazed at how many people don't know the term "humblebrag"
3 likesDon’t talk after an incident.
2 likesThe video was enough. The interview only served to elevate the conviction from manslaughter to first or second degree murder.
2 likesAt 40:49 he says “bbb” and just barely holds himself back from saying “black.”
2 likesScott Johnson He wouldn’t have beat this murder even if he had OJs defense team 😂
1 likeBad Cornflakes Well that one went right over your head 😂🤣
1 likehonchoryanc Not a chance..The video convicted him more than anything he said
1 likemai gabrielle Yea that about sums it up
1 likeIn case you’re wondering, the guy has no defense training, military training, or law enforcement experience. Hearing him respond “negative” to everything is hilarious. Like an ROTC kid
1 like@Amanda Sack but I totally understood what was meant
0 likesPhew! Thank god he was convicted. Too many guns in America.
1 likePublic Service Announcement $100/hr is way more than enough to put a few nice women in that said bed and have a good time to humble bragged about later
0 likesDamn, another new word added to the vocab, but thanks for that. 😂😂
1 like@Mark Acklin The best part is, that sounds like a British thing to say. HumbleBrag! I say!! HumbleBrag, good sir!!!!
0 likes@Mark Acklin hilarious that what it is.
0 likesImagine going to jail for 1/4 of your life, because you're unhappy with a strangers social etiquette 🤦♂
29 likesReplies (2)
He’s a man of principal.
3 likes1/3
0 likesPeople like this guy are the reason that one florida agency had to tell people not to shoot at a hurricane.
11 likesThe fact that he kept the gun pointed at him while he was running back into the store is just infuriating. I imagine that he was just living out his fantasy of being a ‘’heroic" cop, and he was enjoying it.
4 likesUpdate: He was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit for 92 days served and his appeal was denied. He was attacked by another inmate.
37 likesReplies (3)
Good.
7 likes@Pizzle Rot hahaha .. I agree!! 😂😂😂
1 likeoof good I was worried for a bad ending
0 likesCan you do a video about someone completely innocent being interrogated. I think it would be interesting to compare them to the guilty
5147 likesReplies (64)
Wow, what an idea! I want this too!
142 likesYes please!
7 likesTechnically they are all innocent until the verdict.
55 likesKLAbe technically not
222 likesleila lalala thanks!
0 likesHe has. I can't remember the name of the particular one I'm thinking of, but I'm sure someone can.
10 likes@leila lalala I saw one here on YouTube
3 likesHe's done it before, they were just removed cause of YT
8 likesleila lalala so no
0 likesleila lalala I feel you
0 likesSue Donnery what do you mean
3 likesHe already did
3 likesSue Donnery I would really like to know what you're implying here
3 likesPatreon 🤷🏼♀️🙌🏼
0 likesJust watch this one
2 likesHayden S Hi, could link this channel/website ? I look it and it’s something else.
1 likeYou should watch Internet historians video of balloon boy, there's no murder and stuff but I think you'd like it
3 likesFaustini I love that video haha
0 likesYeah yeah
0 likes@Faustini great recommendation. That's a great story, especially the follow up. I really felt for that poor dad
2 likesI have seen this exact comment on other crime related videos haha!
0 likesHe just made one today. Are u still here my dude?
16 likes@leila lalala and one guy in the video spent two years in prison for nothing.
2 likesYeysBaws! Lol nice! Didn’t even see that he posted. Thanks for letting me know
3 likesThink you’ll like the newest vid on his channel (:
5 likesGuilty until proven innocent video
20 likesHe just did one!
1 like@KLAbe No they aren't. They aren't innocent. They are TREATED as if they are innocent by the court.
1 likeThere’s already a video of Casey Anthony
1 like@Andrew Casey Anthony wasn't innocent.
27 likesYou finally got it !!!
1 likeSo was this guy innocent or guilty?
0 likesThere is. (I know 1 year later)
1 likeThere actually is. Look on this channels videos
1 like@Juubakka found the racist guys
1 like@Hayden S where's the patreon?
0 likesThere’s one I saw..” guilty until proven innocent “
1 likeYes please because while I agree with a lot of these theories as to how people behave. I know that not all of them are true for me and would get me in trouble if I was innocent. Lol
0 likesHe did. Multiple videos I think
0 likes@Tavawesome technically yes
0 likesHe's made 2 now
0 likes@Jacob lmfaoooo
0 likesThis exists now if you didn’t already know
0 likesThere are quite few lol 🤣🤣
0 likesI'd like to see the difference between one who is completely not guilty and ones (like him) who don't FEEL guilty or as if they did a single negative thing
0 likesHe's posted one but I'd like to see more
0 likes@Hayden S
0 likesPay wall
@KLAbe
0 likes😑
Look for the case of detective Thompson "wrong way to interrogate someone"
0 likesI've been waiting for this for so long
0 likesThey did, guy had been shot in the face, but they treated him as guilty. The guy was interrogated by detective Dalton. It's a grim watch
0 likes@Gordon Alias Me
0 likesWhat?
@R Nickerson Who ?
0 likes@Gordon Alias Me
0 likesWhich video?
Bit late but guilty until proven innocent did this. But you've probably watched it already
0 likes@Tavawesome uhhh, yes. Yes they are.
0 likesJeff
0 likes@KLAbe you know what he meant
0 likes@KLAbe i don’t think thats how it works buddy
0 likesWatch his "Guilty until proven innocent" video, that's one.
0 likesHe has
0 likesGuilty until proven innocent
@Gordon Alias Me The Michel Rafferty case was the one where he kidnapped an 8 year old, did inappropriate things to her and then killed her, there was no gun? no bullets involved??? as far as i was aware, just rewatched that one the other day and there was no mention of a bullet???
0 likes@Golly GodMy bad . Wrong name Ryan Waller, I think. Interrogated by Detective Dalton, bad cop
1 like@Tavawesome Yes technically
0 likesI think you're thinking of literally
So this guy walks around strapped looking to start shit with people and prepared to kill them if desired or if he feels scared. I consider him a threat to the community.
58 likesThis guy terrifies me because he's not a psychopath, he's not a sociopathic narcissist, he's not a serial killer, he genuinely believes that it's perfectly okay for him to murder a man after physically confronting the man's wife and face zero repercussions because "Well, they were doing something wrong and I'm jumpy with my gun." There are millions of Punisher-wannabes out there with this asshole's exact mindset trying to play vigilante, and the police are completely oblivious that they are worshiped by these trigger-happy animals.
36 likesReplies (5)
bruh how the fuck did he physically confront the man's wife?? it was a verbal confrontation at worst, and that's only if you're really that keen on calling it a confrontation; after all, he was just trying to explain to her that she isn't allowed to park where she had, and get her to park elsewhere, or at least get out of that parking spot
3 likesI seriously don't understand how everyone is venerating Drejka but meanwhile disregarding the fact that the other guy punted him to the ground.. he was not even slightly warranted in tackling and shoving him like that, like wtf everyone?
@David Sermek from what I know, if you were in this situation, you wouldn't know what the man was confronting your wife about. You are shopping and notice through the window that this older man is taking pictures of your vehicle, pointing and yelling at your wife, and you go out there and push him to get him away from her.
1 likeHe doesn't have the knowledge of why the man was confronting his wife, just that an older man was yelling and harassing her, photographing, and circling her car, while he and their child were in the store.
it's obvious he noticed through the window because his child stayed inside the store and didn't come out with him. I believe he absolutely thought his wife was in danger and was trying to protect her from a creep, which obviously he was because of what we know about this man now.
Did he maybe push him a little hard? Sure, but I completely believe he genuinely was concerned for his wife, and I have to say I would be the same way.
@David SermekI believe the words used in the video was a “verbal altercation”. The victim saw a stranger getting into a shouting match with his wife, and while shoving’s not my first response, I know I’d see red if that happened with me and my partner. At any rate, Drejka could have minded his own business about parking of all things.
2 likes@David Sermek because it’s not his job to enforce the law, not to mention DREJKA WAS ALSO PARKED ILLEGALLY AT THE TIME HE CONFRONTED THIS WOMAN. He had no right to tell anyone how to park anywhere and he definitely didn’t have the right to take a life because he was pushed over some bs that he started. Get real dude.
6 likesIf your first response to getting shoved, just a freaking PUSH, is to take out a gun then you’re pathetic and you need prison, just like Drejka.
@David Sermek Sorry, but no self respecting husband would ever put up with a man approaching his wife the way the shooter approached the woman. Most men classify another male who is within arms reach of his woman and being verbally aggressive towards his woman is a physical threat. In that scenario you will invoke the protective instinct of the woman's man.
1 likeWe can only speculate how the husband perceived the threat potential of the male acting aggressively towards his wife. The husband's perception resulted in his decision that physically removing the threat from proximity to his wife was deemed necessary.
It is very likely that Mike, feeling emboldened knowing that he had the fire arm, would have persisted in acting aggressively even towards the husband if the husband and simply engaged him verbally. Mike has a history of acting aggressively towards others and it is plausible to conclude that Mike might have pulled the gun on the husband regardless of what the husband did.
Drejka truly believes he was the hero in this situation. Everything he ever learned has been filtered in his head and changed the original meaning. He justifies all his actions, and embellishes those of others. Crazy.
10 likesNotice how when he is alone in that room he can move his right arm around freely and without any problems but as soon as the detective steps in he takes it off and isn’t even able to shake hands with the right.
9 likesThis man is so rough to watch. Neutralize, threat, target, negative... he's roleplaying like a cop. Embarrassing
7327 likesReplies (50)
nopixel cop rp POGGERS
171 likesWhich is why he went around looking for fights, so he would have an excuse to pull his gun and kill someone.
640 likesGuy thinks he's robocop
120 likesSO cringe
112 likesPeople like him make me question my own sanity he's so sure of himself
82 likesSee also: "force multiplier" 🙄😂
157 likesThey realized that right away and new exactly how to play him, calling him "partner" and cracking jokes about being handsome.
226 likesOfficer what was I supposed to do, the man was about to get a combo
77 likes@chum bucket guy just spent the whole fight crouched in the corner using his ranged attack
47 likesHe wants to act like he’s a big boy, and that he’s actually making a difference, even if he has to force it to happen
25 likes1 thousanth like ;)
1 likeAverage joes who talk like this are super duper cringe
30 likes@Blackened Featherz anyone who talks like this is cringey af, in my unit we only talk like that through a radio, and laugh at each other when we accidentally bring it into face to face or normal conversations
45 likesYou forgot "force multiplier"... Even them cops were like "what the hell boy?"
43 likes@Steven Glikin
8 likesLotta people in uniform say "copy that" and "negative". Nothing wrong with it as long as you're not a complete tool and a poser 😂
@Daily Dissent nah dude, in my unit it's cringy and made fun of all the time unless it's on the comms.
17 likespeople need to differentiate between language in day to day life and language for the comms and operational life
Not even cops should talk like that, soldiers should 😂
9 likes@Mr man
1 likeA few of the top police academies loosely model their programs off DOD tactics and training.
Even has a similar voice
0 likes@Jordan Denison He stands at the end and Shouts "You got HAWKED"
0 likesfr
0 likesAnd cops role-play like military personnel!
5 likesThese are the kinds of people that become cops.
13 likes‘Force multiplier’ wtf
3 likes@Jordan Denison Copixel
1 likeWants to be a soldier, but dislikes people shooting back.
10 likesHe sounds like my uncle lmfao
3 likes@Soleilune Yeah totally, thats exactly it
0 likes“Force multiplier” lmao
8 likesNot really
0 likesAnd there are actual cops that are like this
5 likesHe neutralized his life for 20 years and now he is a target for the homeboys on the mainline. He’ll have a negative experience.
16 likes35:00 min "force multiplier"
9 likesAnd all the "negative sir!", was so cringeworthy. If I it wasn't about a young father being shot, it would be even funny.
Totally. He is SOOO insanely arrogant and way too eager for an excuse to use his gun as “self-defense”
3 likesHe probably just got his gun and wanted to use it. He went looking for trouble.
4 likes@Daily Dissent might explain why they seem like an occupying force
1 likeHe thinks he's in SEAL team six.
3 likesright he so arrogant and annoying
2 likesI love how he used the word “neutralized” to get understanding from the cops and looked to them for approval, but the cop pretended like he had no idea what the word meant and said “What do you mean by that?” Lmaooo
5 likes@Random Rfkov by h
0 likesPlay stupid games, win stupid prizes!! That goes for both of them!!
1 likeRight.
1 like@chum bucket lol
0 likes@Soleilune kinda like a few actual cops
1 likeMan's definitely religiously drinks monster and listens to five finger death punch
0 likesHe’s role playing more like a mercenary…he came there with intent to interrogate and hopefully execute people…he’s been watching Deathwish too many times 😯
0 likeshis dad was a state trooper so probably why.
0 likes@Jordan Denison my two communities collide
1 likeIf that was a cop though, he would have been found not guilty....right?
1 likeThere’s a word for this:
0 likesTacticool
🙄
It sounded like the investigators were almost begging him to say he was fearful for his life, and the guy just couldn’t take a hint and instead kept digging himself into a deeper hole.
14 likesTo anyone trying to defend this dude, one of the first things he said is "he hit me from behind" He knows he had to lie cause he has no legal justification for shooting him down.
4 likesThis person is such a coward. He wants enforce laws, even though it’s not his job. But someone pushes him and he shoot’s him instead of defending himself with his hands like a real man. This guy is pathetic and weak.
25 likesThe man was remorseless. The only emotion I saw was when he talked about his dogs. Suburban vigilantes are the most dangerous.
17 likesReplies (1)
And these types almost always are middle to upper middle class men in suburban environments who despite, or perhaps, because of their material security, feel the need to larp as rambo if (poor) criminals step up to them. They’re also massive dorks.
0 likesNote that this shouldn’t be taken as a blanket statement on responsible gunowners, but rather a specific type of person who if they didn’t own guns would be just as confrontational or even call the police on little cause.
As a disabled person I get being frustrated with people who park in handicapped spots but I would never kill anyone over it
48 likesReplies (9)
Exactly. Who knows, maybe the woman and/or kids are disabled. Not like getting one of those damn "handicapped" parking plates are easy to acquire. Either way, this was not a life or death situation. Drejka should have minded his own business and left this family alone.
8 likesRU sure??? Just kidding
0 likes@Japheth Grimm Maybe the mother (who isn't disabled) should've parked somewhere else and led by example in front of her kids (who also aren't disabled). Maybe the father should've asked what was going on first instead of initiating physical violence. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes 🤷♂️
3 likes@Rob Oc you don't know who is disabled and who isn't. Regardless, that guy should have minded his own business and nobody should have been shot.
4 likes@Japheth Grimm the mother shouldn't be parking in spaces that are reserved for people with disabilities. The fact that the space was used and no one with a disability left the car is pretty ignorant. Not to mention, arrogant. Nobody would've been shot had the father approached the situation with civility. He acted in violence because of words. The subsequent response was wrong but so was every action leading up to that
2 likes@Rob Oc again, you don't know who is disabled and who isn't. You can't always look at someone, especially with a few seconds of grainy video, and determine whether or not they are disabled. Once again, that guy should have minded his own business and nobody should have been shot. There's nothing more to it than that.
2 likes@Japheth Grimm well I live in a country that calls out ignorant and arrogant people like that. If they were disabled, they would've had some sort of pass or sticker on their car. But they didn't. If anyone was disabled, it would've been a pretty big factor in the case. Considering it's not mentioned once, it's doubtful. Unless you know something the detectives don't? You're clutching at straws and it's embarrassing.
1 likePeople like them would get called out where I live. The arrogance is palpable and the people where I live wouldn't tolerate it. Then again, I don't live in a crazy gun toting country. It's incredible you're not even able to admit the family were wrong to park there to begin with.
@Rob Oc it doesn't matter what country you live in. I am a disabled person. I know plenty of other disabled people as well. It is ridiculous how difficult it is to get a placard for a vehicle, and even far more difficult than that to get a designated license plate, here in the USA.
3 likesThere was no justifiable reason for that man to approach that family; and far less justification for anybody to have been shot. It's disgusting and disturbing how you refuse to stop justifying the shooter shooting anybody.
What are you gonna do, a wheelie on them?
0 likesI do agree that Drejka shouldn't have been pushed, but if a random guy was snooping around my car with the mother of my children and aggressively speaking to her, as a man I would've considered doing the same thing. The evidence is clear that as soon as Drejka pulled out his fire arm the other man began to back away several steps before being shot. Drejka didn't give him a warning, shoot him somewhere that couldn't potentially end up fatal. Nothing. Not only that but he's had encounters with other people in traffic negatively and threatened them with his gun. All this over a parking spot he didn't even need himself. He was looking for a fight. He easily could have calmly said to the lady that it's rude to park there when she doesn't need to be and end of conversation. Bickering back and forth does nothing but cause a fight. He has no remorse for what he did and said he wouldn't have changed what he did. Hope he never sees his dogs again.
79 likesReplies (3)
Why only as a man?
0 likesI agree with a good chunk of what you said but one thing I wanted to mention is a point that is very often misunderstood. You said that he could have threatened him with the gun or shot him somewhere that wouldn't be as lethal. That's a very common mistake a lot of people make, and I understand why. "Common sense" would say anything that can be done to avoid killing someone is better than killing them, but what changes that is the presence of a lethal weapon. The short of it is that if you draw a firearm on someone, you SHOULD be shooting to kill. The reason is that, A: shooting to wound/warming shots are irresponsible and dangerous as a stray round could hit someone else and even shooting someone in an extremity can be lethal, from blood loss, shock, etc. and B: a firearm is a lethal weapon, so if you draw a firearm, you're doing so with the known risk of death, so to pull it out to "threaten" someone in the hopes they go away without shooting admits that you still believed that there was a chance the situation could be resolved without killing them. You're admitting through your actions that you opted for the lethal option without believing it was wholly necessary. The same goes for wounding someone. This is something that very few people seem to realize, and I figure a good portion of that is due to media (entertainment as well as news) and humans' natural instinct not to harm other people. Now, there are some things that change that depending on the situation and your duty as a private citizen vs. a government official (are you obligated to flee from or confront the threat) or if the nature of the threat changes on the fly, etc., etc., but for the most part, if you draw a lethal weapon on someone, the assumption is that you believe lethal force is necessary.
6 likesNever draw a weapon to injure you shoot to kill or not at all!
1 likeDive into his priors. If her husband hadn't showed up, he was going to use the gun on her. Kids or no kids. He did it before in a road rage incident.
8 likesso sickening how while michael is lying and fabricating his story, that woman must’ve been in so much pain at the loss she just witnessed
51 likesReplies (4)
I honestly can’t even tell if he’s intentionally lying I think he might just be delusional honestly.
1 likeMaybe she would not be in any pain if she would not have parked in an illegal parking spot!!!! She is the one that started the ball rolling!!!
0 likes@Danny J She was parked illegally but she didn't take the space from Drejka. There were MULTIPLE empty spots MUCH closer to the door so, unless someone pulled in in a handicapped van there was really no problem. Drejka is NOT the parking police nor is he the owner of the store therefore it was NOT his place nor his right to harass her about parking there. If he was so disturbed by it he should have either stayed in his car and called the police or gone inside and let the clerk/manager know. about it and let THEM handle it.
1 like@Danny J I watched the sentencing. The judge gave an excellent detailed step by step explanation of this incident and why it was not self defense. The judge also brought up previous incidents provoked by Drejka. Drejka was a wanna-be cop who appointed himself lot monitor of the convenience store parking lot. The store owner had told Drejka about confronting people for using the H/C parking space, saying something along the lines of "it's not worth it. You're going to run into the wrong person one day." Reportedly Drejka replied, "That's why I carry."
0 likesThe judge also noted how ironic it was that when Drejka drove into the lot to confront the woman parked in the H/C space, he himself parked illegally. Supposedly Drejka would sit in his car across the street and watch the H/C space. When someone without a H/C placard or plate parked in the H/C space he would drive into the lot kinda Starsky & Hutch style to confront them. I don't know what kind of car he drove, but I'd bet money it was a Crown Vic.
I love how these interrogations are always just slow, painful processes of letting the suspect know they’re fucked
8217 likesReplies (38)
excellent lessons to be learned by viewers though. after seeing all these videos, including the innocent ones, i am not talking to any of these guys without a lawyer.
374 likesLike an animal that's got caught in quicksand, they slowly sink, and the more they talk, the quicker they sink.
105 likesThey try so damn hard to get outta the pit they keep diggin themselves in 💀
68 likes@dethw1sh I'm kinda confused on this law stuff, so could you explain how or what a lawyer would do in this type of situation?
8 likesThis guy could have got away with it if he didn’t talk
18 likes@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ , anything you say in the interrogation can be used to incarcarate you. if you say nothing, which is completly legal, you have a much better chance of being proved not guilty.
57 likes@beezymeech That's sad. He is guilty.
11 likes@Luis Sanchez "bUt I fElT tHrEaTenEd bY ThE bIg AnD sCaRy BlAcK mAn!"
60 likesyupppp
1 like@trollolol ah yes pushing someone over = gunshot thru the head
11 likes@Luis Sanchez well innocent people are coerced into confessing a crime they didn’t do all the time, so whether you did it or not you should always ask for a lawyer and never say a word to the cops
36 likes@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ , advise you on what info you should and should not answer too how much you should divulge, and to what level of detail. generally a lawyer is gonna try and keep you from saying anything that will throw them the case
4 likesI love it because king YouTube videos are amazing
2 likes@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ , your lawyer will seal your mouth, keep lips closed at least...
0 likes@dethw1sh seriously. Don’t say a single word.
3 likesLOL I thought the same I said ‘this dude gave everything he needed to be locked up’
5 likes@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ , stop you from incriminating yourself and usually end these interrogations more quickly
2 likes@Wolfsit The man could've busted his head open on the concrete. Don't assault other people, and you don't get shot. Simple.
5 likes@trollolol could've is operative. Does possible injury warrant murder? Why not just press charges and waste everyones time and money, now someone's father doesn't have time with their kids to watch them grow up.
9 likes@Luis Sanchez sometimes you can be falseley accused too
1 likeHe could have ended the interview at any time.
2 likesLmao.. you're dead on right there. It's fascinating though.
2 likes@Deathw1sh. Totally agree, the police are always " if you're innocent, there's no need for a lawyer and we won't be able to help you once you lawyer up" which translates to "if you're an idiot, there's no need for a lawyer and we won't be able to trick you or into saying something incriminating". Side note, if you get arrested and are actually innocent , never agree to do a polygraph as generally non criminal people will be very anxious about what's going on and can easily fail a polygraph (At least that's what my criminology teacher taught us). Also , I am not trying to be anti police at all just pro individual rights. 😜
6 likesExcept they literally let the man go after the interrogation, and he was only taken off the street weeks later by instruction of the district attorney. The cops literally wanted to let him go.
5 likesthese are my favorite videos to watch. it’s so interesting to see what the tactics are and how planned and technical interrogations are
2 likesJust the build up is enough to keep me going😬😬😬
0 likesEven though they deserve it I still get second hand embarrassment
3 likesHe wasn't fucked yet, though. The detective sheriff deputy believed him and let him go, but the DA prosecuted him. He left a free man after this interview. That's why JCS put considerable emphasis on the fact that he didn't believe that his life was in danger at the time he was pushed. The district attorney chose to charge him with the crime because he gave no indications his life was truly in danger. He should have remained silent and spoken to a lawyer, but that would have most likely led to an arrest on probable cause.
0 likesFacts
0 likesWatch Jeff 😂
1 like@cats dogs baby yaaawwwnnn what's that word mean again
1 likeNot so much letting the suspect know as much as letting tge suspect unknowingly incriminate themselves.
0 likesWhen your freedom is on the line dont ever conswnt to these "casual" interviews...
Everything you say from then on needs to be well thought out from every perspective because it can and will be held against you.......you know the rest
Me, too.
0 likesThere's no more effective strategy than letting an idiot dig their own grave.
0 likes@Shawn no.
0 likesI remember watching another YouTuber that had a scale of how fucked the suspect felt. It was from “comfortable” to “i’m fuck for life”
0 likes@Vexinal "Lucky for me I always use a force multiplier to clear all threats."
0 likes@dethw1sh ohhhhh yeah never, no fuckin shot
0 likesHe was wrong for pushing him but pushing is not a reason to kill someone, these vigilantes look for any reason to spread the hate they keep
482 likesReplies (27)
If he pushes him and he hits his head he could die. In my opinion that is lethal force. Many people have died in fights. I also believe physical blows are lethal force. So I think it is more complicated than you suggest. Do I think he's a good guy? No, but do I think it is ok to sprint and push someone to the ground? Also no. I don't think it is ok to physically assault someone unless you are defending yourself. The dad should have been more mature and not so quick to escalate the situation. He should have handled that without sprinting and throwing someone to the ground unless his family was in danger.
35 likesI should clarify that I don't think he is in the right for taking a father from his kids. Especially since he took a step back. I'm not taking his side but I'm saying they were both in the wrong.
21 likes@Bellicose 20 yea right bud, if he did anything OTHER than run up and immediately shove someone to the ground would have surprised me. If you haven't seen a million other people just like him then you've never lived in a big city before, talking through a situation is not really their modus operandi. Best to just ignore and avoid, unless you want to be in jail for shooting someone because that would be the only way to 'win' any kind of encounter here.
13 likes“They were wrong for killing George but police negligence/brutality is not a reason to riot , loot, burn, murder, etc”
7 likes@mazystarr I’m confused… you think it was wrong for a man who stopped at a convenient store with his family minding his own business, when all of a sudden the people in the store start yelling and screaming that a man outside is being crazy and yelling at a woman in the parking lot, he walks out to make sure it’s not HIS wife/kids and when it IS he pushes the man AWAY from his wife. He didn’t walk up out of nowhere and punch a random guy in the face???!! That man literally said he was coming from the damn WAWA down the road!! He full on only stopped when he saw a car parked n that spot and he wanted to make sure it was someone parked there legally because as he stated…”people do it everyday and it’s my pet peeve” If you wouldn’t come out and push some lunatic who is screaming at your wife and kids, then I feel really bad for your wife and kids. People like you are the reason why we have such a disgusting society.
28 likes@Bellicose 20 I don’t know if your a man or women but I find it troubling that A, if your a woman and your in your own car with your young children in the back and some crazy man pulls up and starts taking pictures or your license plate and then comes around and takes pictures from the front where you can clearly be in them and then the guy starts yelling and walking up to your car, you wouldn’t want someone, anyone, but especially your husband to push the guy away from you and your children? B, as a man you wouldn’t try to protect your wife and children from a crazy man who when you walk out is yelling and approaching your family? That man is a clear psychopath and who knows if the husband didn’t come out and he kept yelling and arguing with the woman, would he have shot her if she moved her hand to get her phone? It seems extremely possible that could have been another outcome. So to say that anyone else other than Michael was in the wrong here is absolutely disgusting.
12 likes@Melissa Coulter Wow! Don't hold back now, tell me how you really feel.
2 likesLessons learned:
14 likes-Don't use handicap parking spots.
-Don't play parking lot's Batman.
-Keep your hands to yourself.
-Don't shoot a retreating man.
He was not wrong for defending his family against a strange man.
18 likes@Bellicose 20 you gotta be kidding me...
3 likes@meganjerai he could of handled it different. it was not smart to just run up on someone and shove them. you gotta be smarter than that. especially nowadays you dont know who is a psycho walking around with a gun. I never get into an altercation with anyone for that reason. if some punk is tailgating me I move and get out of their way. if someone tries to start something with me I back away and get out of there asap. because I'm not losing my life over some punk having a bad day or some loser wanting to act out his cop fantasy.
4 likesPushing someone away from your partner, who is being yelled at and abused by this, is self defence. He was protecting his wife because he thought she was in danger. Pushing isn’t wrong. Not in this case.
10 likes@Bellicose 20 Yea I agree, the other guy was in the wrong too, the irony is that if Drejka was a normal and good law abiding citizen he could have actually pressed charges for being pushed like that. But instead he prefers to be a murderer....
4 likesThat's debatable (whether he should have fired) but yes, pushing someone to the ground IS justification for pulling your weapon aka defending yourself.
3 likesYou are right on the first part: the husband shouldn't have turned a verbal argument into a physical one.
Couldn't have said it any better
0 likesI’m feeling like people are always looking for a reason these days. Best minding my own business, folks are crazy or the littlest things. Like the say, you never know. People are insane
3 likes@Melissa Coulter Defending someone does not necesseraly imply pushing by surprise someone to the ground so hard he could break some of his bones. Especially not when you're defending the person from the terrible agression of being talked too loud.
3 likes@Brooklyn B3 considering your perspective, which i really don' believe as honnest, in what kind of logic, yelling at someone allows you to assault the yeller and would make it self defense, because you suppose that it implies danger even though there was no phisycal harm no danger and no threat to her life.
2 likesBut in the other hand, getting assaulted by surprise, being pushed to the ground wich implies physical harm and possible threat to life, would be less legitimate as a reason to react with self defense ?
@Melissa Coulter you are thinking with your emotions just like they were and look how that ended up. I would protect my wife by going outside, asking what's going on, and calling the police. Like a rational responsible adult. Taking pictures of a license plate and arguing with a woman isn't actually assault or cause to assault someone in the real world. I have two cauliflower ears to prove I can beat someone's ass, but I know that the best fights are the ones you don't get in. Especially when crazy people own guns and you have kids. You are imagining a world where men defend their wives and everyone sings praises and nothing bad happens to the hero, but in real life sometimes the hero gets shot and killed. There were other ways to deal with that where cooler heads prevail. Just because reality isn't pretty doesn't mean I don't want to defend my wife.
2 likes@Nashoo O yes exactly
0 likes@mazystarr I live in a metro will just over a million people, I am not denying that these people exist, I am merely stating that they are in the wrong.
0 likes@Bellicose 20 I'm actually on the fence on this one. He was physically assaulted. I've seen "Stand Your Ground" cases that didn't even come close to this and never make it to a courtroom. I think any person that does this is a douche but as far as crimes go? The USA is the wild west and this guy goes to prison? It don't add up.
1 likeI'm no trained professional in confrontation but I would have to agree with his assessment. "If someone comes at me like that, I'm assuming their coming back for more".
Really tough call this one. A better lawyer would have got him off. Keeping silent would have too.
which is bullshit - pushing is often merely the first thing that happens - the head stamping comes later
1 like@StereoPatios Seeing how I have seen people literally shoot another for far less, and get off, numerous times, I'm scratching my head on this one. He was literally assaulted right?
2 likes@Christopher Chamberlain How are you confused? He literally provoked this whole situation…going out of his way to play handicapped police, verbally attacking a woman while she’s just sitting on her car with her kids and taking pictures of some random lady’s license plate is NOT ok!
1 likePushing him to the ground was wrong. And also, why park in a handicapped? But what about "de-escalate." Twenty years for manslaughter seems excessive. And also the decision by prison authorities to allow black prisoners to beat him up. Florida should admit they are not enforcing "stand your ground."
0 likes@Bellicose 20 he didn't sprint at all. He walked up and shoved him
0 likesInterviewer : Is there anything you would change , looking back?
4 likesSuspect: No...?
That shows why you belong in prison. The correct answer is " Yes ! I would never have approached the car." This stunning lack of insight and entitlement puts the suspect at risk for reoffending.
If a guy is running at you and still coming…by the time you fall, get your weapon, raise your weapon prop your weapon with the other hand, he would be on top of you before you turn over in that distance
3 likesThis guy so righteous, I can’t tell if he’s blatantly fabricating or if he is just one of those people that can’t fathom that he’s in the wrong so in his mind he actually remembers it the way he needs it to go.
The worst part is this guy could get the longest sentence and would never feel remorse because he really believes he is right…even if a video shows he’s wrong he would still disagree…craziness
He was so happy to find out he went from a victim to a killer, someone like him doesn't shoot someone because he wanted to deter him. He shot him because he wanted to kill someone.
3 likesthis guy was so ready for the approval from law enforcement, he spilled the beans on everything. the investigators played their hand very well, too - never seeming too judgmental, so he'll continue to elaborate on his motivations and intentions
917 likesReplies (14)
Oh yeah, he said literally everything that could incriminate him. I feel like you could just sense the absolute dumbfoundedness when he says “it felt like a split second” and the officer just says “ok......... alright Micheal uh, we’ll be right back.”
33 likes@Connor Grissett 31:11
5 likesHadn't thought about it much until now, but the detectives in these videos are genuinely just trying to get the truth and enforce justice by the book. By no means does this represent all of peace keeping, but it does a good job of showing how it is done when done correctly.
11 likesThese videos are strangely reassuring. I hope if I'm ever in a bad situation, I have one of these detectives figuring out what happened. Fingers crossed that this comment ages well.
@CACairns theres also ones who coax confessions from innocent people as well, theyre not all good
14 likes@G N Obviously, none claimed that.
1 like@G N I literally pointed that out in my comment.
3 likes"Some people aren't listening, just waiting for their turn to talk."
@CACairns Don't watch the "Guilty until proven innocent" one!
3 likesYEA, OF PROTECTING HIMSELF FROM THE VIOLENT ATTACKER.....o k..
0 likesas soon as the firearm came out, the victim backed up. he had a family.
1 like@la pace sia con voi yes. but the perspective of Michael, on the ground, as the attackers body turns, it looks like he was coming at him, and dazed and confused he reacted with one shot. bad luck for the attacker, he could have lived. he needs to appeal , and get a better lawyer, that wont allow video manipulation to fool the jury. slow motion and pausing , is not reality of decision making. THEY FOOLD THE JURY. He needs a lot of help after this.
1 likeit was on surveillance. how was it video manipulated? if the shooter was dazed and confused, he shouldn't carry a fire arm. the attacker backed off. even if mr drejka did not see that (which i don't believe. he was trigger happy), again he shouldn't be allowed to carry a fire arm. you don't shoot over an off guard bch shove
0 likes@la pace sia con voi there showing it in slow motion. and pausing reality. Also, the perspective is high and angled down. The perspective of Mikael is low and angled up. wHEN I FIRST SAW THE VIDEO, FOR ME, IT looked as if he did step towards him. after watching again, i was looking at his legs , not torso, you clearly see the attacker steps back. However again, after getting slammed to the GROUND HARD., from behind,!!! getting hurt and disoriented , in the split second, NOT PAUSED, NOT SLOW MOTION, He defended himself, and from the perspective of Mikael, not looking at legs, ONLY HEAD AND TORSO, ...IT WILL SEEM FOR A SECOND, HE WAS GOING TO CONTINUE TO ATTACK.... THIS IS MY OPINION. i FEEL BAD THE ILLEGALY PARKED ATTACKER DIED. BUT HE DID START THE VIOLENT ASSULT FIRST .....AND ILLEGALY PARKED.. PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT , AS MUCH OF A DICK MOVE IT IS, PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO TALK, AND EXPLAIN LAW, WITHOUT GETING VIOLENTLY PUSHED TO THE GROUND. They also plated the race card. ITS GETTING OLD. Being black does not give you the right to illegally park and violently push people to the ground because your mad they calling you out. WHAT IF MIKEAL WAS A COP. ALL CERCOMSTANCE THE SAME... PRETEND, IMAGINE, WHAT WOULD THE COURT CASE BE LIKE.....? EXACTLY, THERE WOULNT BE ONE. THE ATTACKER WAS KILLED, BECASUE HE ATTCKED WITHOUT PROVOCATION.
0 likeshe defended his life so he could spend it in prison. i thought what if that was a plain clothes officer. the victim would have assaulted in officer. i don't believe a trained officer would make a bch move like that or be off guard to someone rushing him from behind. if he did, the whole town would be on fire. i'm sorry too.
0 likesHe forgot he was yelling at a women shot an unarmed man because it’s HIS store also his arm hurts so bad he couldn’t shake a hand.
0 likesIt baffles me why these interviews last longer than 5 minutes. Even if it was a clear cut case of self-defense, the only sane thing to do is to ask for a lawyer straight away.
29 likesReplies (5)
The average person that is in these interview rooms isn't very intelligent. They don't realize how screwed they are. They think that they can talk their way out of the room.
3 likesThen we wouldn't have these interesting interrogation videos to watch and argue about. lol
1 likeIts the equivalent of those 5'11 bridge videos, it's obvious what to do but dumb *** still getting the roof ripped off their vans.
0 likes@Andy Carter lol u mean 11'8"
0 likes@HamsterFromAbove Yes, however it's like being without boxing experience and taking on a heavyweight Olympic boxer. It's uneven from the start, and there is no way they can win.
0 likesI like (in a morbid kind of way, I know this is a homicide and all) how the detective starts explicitly and clearly asking him "So you never heard a threat? Didn't say anything to him? No indication that he was going to continue attacking you?" at around 25:00 . Again, mind you, I'm aware that this is a real case and someone actually died, not trying to make light of it or 'root for' the suspect, but part of me was just going "dude should have asked for a lawyer, because he's handing the prosecution the case on a silver platter in that part of the conversation. This is textbook 'what not to say to cops'."
4 likesReplies (1)
Your comment could have been a 1/10th as long and still got your point across
2 likesThis situation for this man and his poor family who had to witness him be shot in front of them is so horrific. Prayers for his family ❤❤
6 likesYou can just tell that michael always wanted to use his gun. Its a sad case where 2 families have gotten destroyed just because because michael thought it was the only solution to end a fight. Michael killed a man that stepped up for his wife and kids. Even though the man shouldn't have pushed michael. Shooting was defenitely not the answer. He might felt threatened but thats never a reason to kill a father, a aggressor or just a loving man that backed away when the gun was pointed at him. There are no winners in this case. I just hope michael will come clean and feels bad ending a fathers life for a push. He got shot and killed right in front of the eyes of his kids and wife.
5 likesRest in peace and i really hope their families will do good without any fathers around.
My thoughts go out to them and its just sad.
No more words needed.
Replies (1)
The victim shoved him in response to a stranger getting into a verbal altercation with the mother of his children. Over a parking dispute.
0 likesHave some perspective
“Drejka was named as the aggressor in four prior road incidences where he threatened drivers with a gun”
2339 likesSurprise, surprise.
Replies (24)
i live nearby where this took place, and drejka absolutely had a reputation for being a loudmouth vigilante. a co worker of mine claims he got into a verbal altercation with him once, and i don’t doubt his claims.
69 likesthis was sadly inevitable.
THAT'S A YEILD GOD DAMNIT!
17 likespulls gun
Draco was named as the aggressor in for prior Road incidents I am not a grammar Nazi I just have grammar OCD. And I use the phone auto dictate, that’s why it says Draco. And who are we to judge Draco may well have been named in for prior road incidents. Thank you for the info.
1 likeim amazed at his capacity to threaten without shooting. cheers.
2 likesBecause he was?
0 likes@jjcoola998 and plenty of us blacks too ....
2 likes@jjcoola998 derp.... Sure there is and every person that slights you for whatever reason is racist too right?
4 likesSeriously if you spend all your time looking for it, don't be surprised you find it when it's not even there....
@Michael Stack his grammar is right and yours is wrong though..?
4 likes@Michael Stack he meant four not for I need you to know this you look very silly especially with the draco stuff
0 likes@scurvypilled he isn’t the first racist in the comments yet you point him out. Whack
0 likesImo this case is what happens when three idiots/hit heads collide. Natural selection occurred, 1 hot head leaves wit their life, without their loved one and without a felony. When stuff like this happens, it’s best to leave the situation. If a crazy person approaches your car, don’t engage, leave. The shooter was definitely justified but at the same time wasn’t as he had caused the entire conflict imo, this is why you don’t get physical with strangers, you have no idea if they have a gun.
2 likesThis man was LOOKING for a situation where he could kill someone in “self defense”
9 likes@Eddie How is that not natural selection? You mean to tell me that having a weapon isn’t natural? It’s 100% human nature to have/use weapons for self defense.
0 likesAt least we agree this was a case of stupidity at its finest. I carry a gun everywhere I go, I don’t walk around like a sherif like Dreika did, I avoid all confrontation and never want to use it. Not my job to tell an asshole they parked in the wrong spot, it’s law enforcement’s job.... if Dreika truly felt that the driver should have been in some sort of trouble, he should have just called the police, he wouldn’t be in prison right now if that was the case.
@jjcoola998 macaroon shouldn't have parked there
0 likes@James Tomasino that's absolutely crazy, man. I kinda shocks me that you knew this man almost personally, and now you're here. It truly is a small world after all.
0 likes@dsch1znit The shooter was just that. He wasn't threatened and he didn't feel.his life was in danger. He thought he was the arbiter of who should park where. He isn't.
8 likes@jjcoola998 how you gon bring race into this clown
1 like@James Tomasino just wondering was he also known for only targeting black people?
0 likes13/53
1 like@jjcoola998 same thing, swap white with black and legal kill to illegal kill. Lol.
1 like@Mercmad black people don’t refer to themselves as blacks...
1 like@jjcoola998 Shut it. It's enough they they're racist, you don't have to be as well.
1 like@jjcoola998 It's not just white dudes. Don't make this about race.
0 likes@jjcoola998 Not true at all.
0 likesThe truth is, had Drejka stopped when he fell down on the floor and called the cops, he probably would have won the "argument". But he decided to escalate and took out the gun 😕 that's when he screwed everything.
31 likesReplies (2)
Not necessarily. He approached a woman in a car with her children and was taking pictures of her license plate and then starts yelling at her and coming up on the car while inside the store people are yelling that some guy is screaming at a woman. The husband sees it’s his family and pushes the crazy man away to protect them. He clearly is trying to get this guy away from them which you can see by the way he pushes him. Where does the piece of shit land? Back and to the right of the car where his family is.
2 likes@Melissa Coulter what was he protecting is family from exactly? Like this guy was super wrong to shoot him, but you shouldn’t just walk up and shove someone ether. The victim made a big mistake. Just like you never mess with road rage because you never know how mentally unstable the other driver is. You have no clue how crazy someone is, so you should show a lot more tact when dealing with people
0 likesLove when geniuses incriminate themselves when they forfeit their rights and talk to law enforcement without legal counsel.
8 likesHim carrying a weapon made him feel superior therefore he had no problem starting a confrontation. He knew he was protected and gave zero sh*ts about any one else's safety. I'm sure he walked around feeling like a god.
4 likesI’m 5 minutes in laughing at this man saying “nothings broken, just scraped up” and then making a makeshift sling outta his shirt. Man’s is desperate for sympathy
20 likesHe seems to be the type of guy who thinks he's an Army Ranger after attending a free 1-hour self defense class..
4724 likesReplies (45)
Lmao
14 likesBOW TO YOUR SENSEI
38 likes😂😂 this is so accurate
4 likesThinks he's an army ranger because his great grand pappi showed him some 'military' moves when he was 12.
39 likesSomebody watched “what pretending to be crazy looks like”
6 likesA free 1 hour self defense class, online. 🤦🏼♀️ He's the worst type of human.
6 likesExcept he doesn't
0 likesDoes that hold true for every citizen who used their gun in self-defense after being attacked???
4 likesYes! Or someone that tried to get in the academy but was denied multiple times and now wanna be the neighborhood watch 😂
6 likesJust from his statements... all this negative, neutralize the thread and all this shit
4 likesHow dare you he served In call of duty modern warfare
13 likes@Sabrason he wasn't under attack. He was shoved to the ground for not minding his business and then shot an unarmed man. This man is a coward.
27 likesFrfr 😂😂😂
0 likesOr former army reserves, thinking he's a damn green beret lmao
1 like@7th Hokage 😂😂😂😂
0 likes@Sabrason No. Just this particular person. As he said in his later statement, he is a wanna be ranger but daddy didn't allow him to be one so he seek satisfaction with effing with people in a convenient store parking lot. He was angry that he felt useless when he was pushed to the ground like a little girl so he cowardly took another man's life with his gun. Few firearm owners are like this and would certainly react differently.
2 likesliterally all i could think while watching this
0 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likes@Sabrason not a lot of people think about the adrenaline that’s pumping when you’re in a situation like that. I don’t think what he did was right, but I could see how it would be justified if the other dude walked closer and didn’t back up but could just be me. I think it should be draw the gun and train it on the attacker and make it clear you will shoot if they come any closer. Then again, adrenaline might mess with your senses.
0 likes@max yoinkage he could’ve felt threatened but I don’t know. Adrenaline is a hell of a hormone. Nevertheless, he wasn’t in the right.
1 like@max yoinkage He was assaulted...you like that word better?? He had no way of knowing whether McG was armed or not in the split second he had to defend himself after being assaulted so he was correct in assuming that McG was armed and had further bad intentions. That's very reasonable and rational and is why many legal experts think it was justified use of the SYG law. You clowns using hindsight to incorrectly claim that Drejka had all this time to think and process information in slow motion only revealed by watching the video many times AFTER THE FACT are extremely ignorant and surely have never been in a life-threatening situation before.
2 likes@Indian Noodle McG took 2-3 steps towards Drejka AFTER the push, was high on MDMA and had a hx of assaulting a PO...only reason he didn't continue was b/c Drejka pulled a gun and fired. That bullet prevented a beating and possibly worse.
2 likes@Sabrason you have a point, but I think the gun would’ve been enough to scare him off. Nevertheless, it’s my opinion and not fact.
2 likesor the kind of guy that thinks hes a navy seal because he plays call of duty
1 like@Sabrason "the bullet prevented a beating"? The gun alone, if he just pointed it at McG, would prevent a beating. The bullet was unnecessary. It took a life; a husband; and a father from 3 kids
2 likes@Indian Noodle I know I have a point...it's the same point many legal experts have who agree that it was a justified SYG shooting. McG was high on MDMA and had a hx of assaulting a PO - were you aware of that?? He hiked up his pants and took 2-3 more steps TOWARDS Drejka AFTER THE PUSH making any reasonable person fear for their life so Drejka did what any reasonable/rational person would do in a high-adrenaline situation after being assaulted yet his response was remarkably calm and measured considering he only used one well-place shot on center mass. Amazing. Drejka didn't keep quiet and lawyer up immediately afterward and the Jury and Judge wanted to punish him for being a wannabe parking lot cop. That's the only reason he was convicted.
1 like😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
0 likes@Sabrason yeah ok edited.
0 likesLet go of my purse!
0 likesPlays COD thinks he's in the military lol
0 likes@Justin Gelvezon Sensei Michael 😂
0 likesIt’s the “free” for meeee 😂😂😂
0 likesFemale cop, “what does your tattoo say?…………Awhhh—ohhhh”. 😂
0 likesHe's a navy seal, not a ranger. And he watched a 4 hour dvd course.
0 likesSo he should hesitate and let the guy pull his own piece ? Should he let the man get in his vehicle where he probably has his own weapon ? What is your next step Dr Hindsight ? What would you have done in this high pressure incident ? You've been attacked, you’re on the ground, a big dude who may or may not want to kill you.... what do you do Matlock ? The only thing I can say is, even though I have military training and may not have handled it like this, the guy IS still alive and who knows what could have happened had he not fired.
1 likeholy shit yes. Give this man a fucking award.
0 likesCant stand men like this ... a license and a few hours at the shooting range and they think they can do whatever they want confronting people like they're police
0 likesI bet that’s how you felt. Takes one to know one.’
0 likes@Chuck Sheppard he should have just got in his illegally parked vehicle and driven off with the realisation that his nosey parker ways aren’t appreciated by all.
2 likesBro relax not everybody is as trained as you are
0 likes@Indian Noodle adrenaline? boy tf. adrenaline does NOT make you shoot a man who is backing away from you.
0 likes@Sabrason no, he didnt pull his gun then fire. He got shoved because he was yelling at a random mother w her kids (which he probably would’ve pulled his gun on, when you know his damn history), then he pulled his gun out, waited 2.5 seconds while mcg BACKED UP, then he shot him. He KNEW he was backing up, and he still shot. He was just waiting for a situation where he could shoot someone because he is a wannabe police officer /military officer.
0 likes@Chuck Sheppard he wasnt going toward his car, he was going toward the shop. I strongly believe that if the roles were reversed and the black man was shouting and swearing at a white mother with ther kids, and the white father came out to stop the situation which he then gets shot, y’all would be saying the black guy should get the death penalty.
0 likes@Indian Noodle You're all speaking in hindsight after watching the video 100 times. Real life doesn't happen like that. You have a split second to react in order to protect yourself and that's what Drejka did. He fired ONE well-placed shot AFTER being violently pushed to the ground with his attacker bearing down on him. Totally justifiable. Had he emptied the clip in him I would agree that it was excessive force but he didn't. Too bad for McGlockton that Drejka knew how to use his fire arm.
0 likes@Chuck Sheppard Exactly, thank you!! Drejka did the world a favor by taking out that POS drug addict McG even though that was not his intention. Hopefully McG's kids grow up learning not to lay hands on strangers like daddy did.
0 likesThe way he reenacts the event makes it seem like he's really proud of it...
1 likewhen i heard the details of the crime my heart broke for this poor woman and her family. she and her husband were just trying to have a nice time with their children. and this fuckin wanna-be cop decided to shoot her partner, the father of her children. and her poor son that was in the store with his father. i hope she and her family is able to find peace. this is heartbreaking, and michael is pure evil and stupid.
2 likesI miss this channel, they are the gold standard for this content.... Netflix needs to pick them up.
7 likesI never realized that a 48-year-old man could be so stupid! Talking to the police before even first talking to a lawyer?
3 likesNothing annoys a professional like an amateur pretending to be like them.
17231 likesReplies (102)
"Force multiplier"
1137 likesbut that exactly the reason why he shoot. he was amateur and he feels threaten (weakling). so he shoot.
406 likesyou see feeling threatened is "subjective". it is measured by who you are and what you are capable of.
if you pushed hard on arnold schwarzenegger down the floor.
he won't feel threaten at all he might come to you and break your neck.
if you pushed hard on tom hidelston down the floor. he'll feel threaten for sure.
and he'll stand up and say "I'm a god you dull creature" then get beaten to death.
2020 Trump it’s pretty complicated stuff.
60 likesJames Chua he said that if the man was backing up he wouldn’t feel threatened and thats what happened but he still shot
166 likesjay blanke affirmative
23 likesYou mean "Wannabe"s?
60 likesIf you don't already follow his escapades, you should check out Jeremy DeWitte.
He is a strangely fascinating individual that is very entertaining.
And they are lots of them!
7 likesJackDManheim hmmmm, tell me more... in what way?
6 likes@Bill Geo Oh boy, if you've never heard of Metro State Motor 1, you're in for a treat. He's taken YouTube by storm over the last several months.
68 likesHe's a Florida resident that owns(owned?) a funeral escort service company that he treated as his own personal police force. He wants to be police very, very badly but sadly his felony record & sex offender status will prevent that forever (thank goodness).
The real FL police have been cracking down on his reckless behavior and police impersonations lately. The body cam footage from the police and from Jeremy himself (because he and all his men also have body cams for some reason) have been getting posted to YouTube and are all so very interesting.
He's a crazy pathological liar who can't help himself. His stories are still be told because his court cases for his many, many crimes are still ongoing. I think around September of last year he was arrested for impersonating a police officer. When they took his body cam they looked at the footage and then pressed charges for the many offenses it showed.
I think this video might be best one to get you started:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r1czLNKjpU
(keep in mind that there is absolutely no reason for somebody providing a funeral escort to have a Kevlar vest, handcuffs, batons, pepper spray & fake handguns [air-soft pellet guns[)
JackDManheim that sounds like a video I saw recently. This guy was claiming to be part of RACES in part of it, which I could tell was bullshit right off the bat. It’s a ham radio emergency club and he didn’t even have a call sign. It’s not like that credential would have given him any of the privileges he was trying to use, anyway. Lol. Might be the same guy.
8 likesJackDManheim I just checked out that video you linked. It’s not the same guy, but similar situation.
4 likes@Bill Geo Lol.
8 likesIsn't it though? And absolutely an asshole supreme. It's so satisfying to see him get his comeuppance.
I haven't seen that website before, thanx for the hookup.
@Bill Geo Actually, speaking of his court appearances, I should offer a trigger warning there:
10 likesat one point he brings up his pregnant wife's multiple miscarriages to garner leniency from the judge. It's pretty gross. He will go to great lengths to paint himself as the victim.
You think cops are professionals? lol Have you SEEN the news since... oh, I don't know, 2007?
8 likes@Mike Bircher The news doesn't talk about the cops that do their job well; ie 'The Majority'. They sell sensationalism.
17 likesLearn to think for yourself, mate. Before it's too late.
Mike Bircher they’re more professional than that guy is, but I do see your point. Lol
5 likes@JackDManheim I'd suggest that same for you, sir. Particularly since you don't seem to live in the U.S. where police seem to think they're above the law. Either that or you have an unhealthy fetish with British comedians and the British way of life.
6 likes@Mike Bircher further evidence that you need to experience life in the real world:
9 likesjust because I called you "mate" does not make me British.
Born & raised in California.
@JackDManheim Actually, it was your playlists that gave you away, but edgy kids will be edgy kids. When you get your driver's license and have your first experience with a police officer outside of OAN or FOX, we can chat. See you in 3 years.
8 likes@JackDManheim Yeah, looking at your twitter account, and all of your cartoon memes/GIFs, I'm dead on here.
2 likes@JackDManheim Also, my mistake, you simply have the thought process of a young child. Carry on.
1 like@JackDManheim Yeah, I feel bad for them, but on the other hand there where a lot of clues that what they were doing was illegal. Your boss telling you "If the cops ask you about this, tell them this and that" for one! ;-)
6 likesA Reptile Disfunction I would consider a breaker-bar on a wrench a force multiplier.
5 likes@Aurtisan Miner thats fair
1 like@Brandon Sutton the dude is a trip.
8 likesHis trial for impersonating a police officer is supposed to start next month, meanwhile more & more footage of him acting a fool comes out everyday. He's crazy.
Imagine being a writer and reading YouTube comments.
1 likeJohn ha ha! I cant imagine!
1 likeprofessional murderers? like the cops we have today?
3 likesmaddog I’m referring to mcdonalds burger technicians.
0 likesHahahahaha😂😂😂
0 likes@jay blanke 🤣🤣🤣👌
0 likesjeremy dewitt vibes
3 likesTim Horton lol. Half this thread is about Jeremy “Motor 1” DeWitte.
5 likesAnd he's a murderer, that is also somewhat urkesome :')
0 likes“Fly home, buddy
0 likesI work alone”
@Cracker Dan That's a good one.
6 likesHe's got an appearance on Dr. Phil coming up.
I'm not sure how he was allowed to leave the state with multiple felony court cases coming up, but he did.
it should bother anyone that is normal. people don't talk like that.
4 likesThen that's probably one cocky pretentious professional. At the end of the day, it's all about the skills, not "pro" titles. (I mean in general, like a Baker, a basketball player or a photographer)
0 likes@Ben Ali Chante pretentious professional is an oxymoron.
3 likes@Aurtisan Miner nope, an oxymoron would be an amateur professional 😉
2 likes@Ben Ali Chante yes, that is another example of an oxymoron.
3 likes@Aurtisan Miner Idk, if I had to correct you, I would say a humble pretentious is the right oxymoron.
0 likes@Aurtisan Miner English is not at all my language but the concept of oxymoron is universal. Basically 2 opposite definitions used together. I guess we disagree on the fact that pretentious is the opposite of pro. To me, the only opposite for pro is amateur
0 likes“Affirmative”
5 likesTook the words out of me.
1 like@Tran That is indeed the correct term in force analysis. The fact that police officers aren't trained in a manner that uses the terminology according to the academia is strange, but I don't see an issue so long as they are trained in the basic concepts.
0 likesHow do you think God feels? Why do you think hell was created?
0 likesNarcs ?
0 likes@NWO Spidey I dont, personally.
0 likes@James Chua cringe
0 likes@James Chua Huh?
0 likes@Aurtisan Miner TDS
0 likesMost "pros" are bums with huge egos
0 likes@Jaded as a professional burger technician at micky-D’s I take offense to that statement.
0 likesYou can call me Betty, and Betty when you call me, you can call me Al😁
0 likes@James Chua very smart statement.
0 likes@Bill Geo omgggg you gotta look up the jeremy dewitt saga
1 likeedit: i just read the rest of the comments.
He was on Dr Phil a couple months ago as well😭😭Serial police impersonator .
“Yeah bro I’m a professional people shooter haha”
0 likesThe Dunning-Kruger effect is incredibly common.
0 likesSo annoying
@Sean O true story. I’m glad I dont suffer from it since I know everything.
0 likeswow do u literally have no idea what ur talking abt or what
0 likesso true, in every domain
0 likes@James Chua exactly. It's almost like if a 28 year old man with 50 lbs of advantage is a mortal threat to a 47 year old on the ground.
0 likesI laugh when I hear people who have little vegetable gardens in their back yards talk like they have 2000 acres of corn to plant. I find it amusing.
1 like@crowtservo like playing ‘Farmville’ gives them expertise. Lol
0 likes@Aurtisan Miner And then they’re shocked when they find out I work on weekends and all the other days of the week.
0 likes@crowtservo I see that same scenario with gold miners. It’s not quite the same as it’s portrayed on tv!
0 likesAs one of those professionals i'd like to ask what made you think he was trying to be like us. Sounds like the dude likes guns and knew the lingo to try and defend yourself. I'm confused as to why everyone keeps saying he's trying to be military.
0 likesJeremy DeWitte has entered the chat
1 like@James Chua ok mr tough guy
0 likes@Tran Since when this term is fucking weird?
0 likesYou can’t just shoot people!!!
0 likes@Soledad Alfaro-Allah You no say
0 likesCops themselves get away with "self defense" cases that are even more obviously not self defense than this one.
2 likes10-4
1 like@Xi Jinping QSO
0 likes@JackDManheim
3 likesHoly shit... I saw your comment about Jeremy DeWitte and I couldn't just leave well enough alone. I'm going on 4 hours of this ass hat's delusional antics and there are just no words. It's the most beautiful train wreck I never knew I wanted to see. Absolute insanity. I love it. Anyway I just wanted to let you know you have brought yet another soul over to "the DeWitte side". Lol and the idiocy is strong with this one. I am forever changed. And grateful. Thanks so much. Take care and stay safe.
@Vixen van Gogh Lol. You're quite welcome.
4 likesThis has gotta be one of the weirdest stories I've ever followed in real time. A psycho soap-opera.
I don't know how far you are into the story at the moment but once Jeremy is released from jail after the 2021 DV arrest, the level of crazy kicks it up another notch; primarily by way of the content coming out of his own YouTube channel.
White entitlement. Assumed that the white cops would give him an easy time, let him go and maybe have a beer afterwards. .
4 likes@ElliotWORLD I think that’s what he was hoping for.
1 like"Negative"
2 likes@Tran🤣🤣🤣
0 likesForce multiplier..I choked lol
1 like@Tran , lol
0 likes@jcs
0 likes@JackDManheim IDK I carry one of those thing into to bed meant for my offered once every few nights
0 likes@JackDManheim OP is referring to the producer of this video. The narrator is the amateur who is pretending.
0 likes@Withheld You might be bringing some of your own baggage to the table. The original comment is about Drejka’s sad attempts at cop talk. Jim Can’t Swim has been around for a minute or two.
3 likes@Tran "Negative."
0 likes"Affirmative."
Woman: “I can defend myself”
0 likesAlso woman: “Do I need to get my man so he can get shot for no reason”
@Tran I mean you can understand what he’s saying I don’t see the reason why the officers say they don’t know what they mean genuinely. I think they just wanted him to explain for the record.
0 likes@Niko he’s a scared uptight guy with a toy.
0 likesRight
0 likes@JUNKWAVE SOUND CHANNEL buncha wannabes!
1 like@James Chua w
0 likesWord.
0 likesBold of you to assume the police officer is a professional either
0 likes@Mike Toback well, we did just watch them work for almost an hour.
0 likesYes the hitman was sad that day but he got over it😂
0 likesHe is a professional,
0 likesA Professional Tw@t
@James Chua Had he been a professional (a cop). He could just come up to some random dude's hotel room, point an AR15 on him, order him on the floor, bully him for a few minutes with orders to perform some weird dances, and finnaly shoot him multiple times for no reason. Also catch that all on tape. Charges dropped. Yes, this had really happened few years ago.
0 likes@James Chua pfffhahahaha
0 likesI love how he slowly comes to the realization that not only is he NOT a cop and not in the right in the eyes of the real cops, but he’s DEFINITELY going to jail😂😂
1 likeI really like the analysis provided by this channel. If anything it shows me not to say a word if ever questioned by police and wait for a lawyer. 5th amendment people! Also this dude was just looking for a reason to shoot someone
1 likeThis man must want an incarceration term. There should be required intelligence quotient tests administered prior to approval for a weapon
3 likesHe could have avoided going to prison if he just used his 5th ammendment rights as he was going in for questioning. It doesn't matter if you think you're right or not, don't subject yourself to interrogation or an interview without a lawyer present.
12 likesHe just blew his whole defense by incriminating himself. If the interview takes longer than 30 mins, ask for a lawyer and invoke the 5th.
Replies (2)
The camera sealed his fate. At first, he lied claiming he ran at him and didn't retreat.
2 likes@Looking 4 Things If he had said nothing, he would have stood a better chance in court. A good lawyer could take something possibly incriminating and spin it to help the defense. Instead he gave testimony that contradicted the video evidence, which like you said, sealed his fate.
1 likeA lawyer, would have told him to be quite. He would have, if he's smart (which this guy isn't). Then the lawyer could have said that he was blindsided, shoved to the ground, and feared for his life in that vulnerable position.
Arguing without contradicting the evidence would have given him a a better defense, but probably still would have had him seen prison. Although since he wasn't caught lying the sentence would have also been lower, and a deal might have been made.
Contrary to popular belief, A terrified coward is actually very dangerous
26357 likesReplies (356)
Can be*** important distinction there
586 likesPowerful words to keep in mind
263 likesAmen brother and/or sister.
124 likesI guess that's what happens when people respond to words with senseless violence. Woops.
469 likesBingo!!
23 likes1966 Absolutely correct.
21 likesIt's part of why I swear by having some self defense skills if you are going to carry. You should be confident you can deal with an unarmed assailant to a reasonable degree.
117 likesB O U Y B O Y why we need to ban guns
82 likes19 66 whoever thinks strong men are dangerous haven’t a clue what weak men are capable of
120 likesLiving proof: 90% of "peace" officers!
22 likes"coward" is that what you call a victim of assault?
29 likes@Guitar of Destiny yip.. no need
2 likesyeah if someone is gonna incite violence over a parking spot is cringe. both were in the wrong.
64 likes@1onefix1 dude you won the internet today
3 likesTruest words ever typed on YouTube.
3 likes@John Doe wait how is the black guy a coward? Somebody starts harassing his wife, so he steps up. Guy pulls out a gun, so he starts to walk away and is shot TRYING TO WALK AWAY. everything in this video makes it clear that the guy with the gun in this situation is a coward.
137 likes@John Doe wow not only are you a racist. You aren't even self aware of your racism. Now that's dumb. I see you missed my point. And avoided answering all of my other points. Suppose you should have came prepared to play this game.....
40 likesThe white guy seemed very proficient and experienced with a gun. So could he not have shot the black guy in the leg, foot etc if any shooting had to be done? That would have neutralised the supposed danger without resulting in the black guys death. Its not like he'd never used a gun before and was just firing blindly in a panic, and just happened to hit the guy in a place that killed him.
64 likesAlso, don't go around confronting people. If you don't like their behaviour eg parking in a disabled zone, then report them to the appropriate people. Don't just go winding other people up, then killing them when they respond back.
I wouldn't call that popular belief. The saying about a cornered animal being dangerous is a common one and is pretty much the same thing.
14 likes@John Doe Wow you certainly are seeing this incident from a totally racist point of view. The white guy was harassing the mother in the car. From her saying 'do I have to get my man?' the white guy could have reasonably guess that he was pushed down by her man. Why? Because he was protecting his wife and kids from a threat. That seems reasonable to me. Would the white guy have harassed the black man in his car if the situation had been that the woman went in the store and left her husband in the car? I'm guessing no. The white guy was fairly convicted of manslaughter IMO
44 likes@Anne MacLeod I understand what you're asking, but that's not a realistic thing. It's very Hollywood. And it's actually easier to kill someone with a leg wound(more vital arteries closer to the surface) than with center mass shots. People quite often don't stop an attack even after multiple gun shots. Most civilian and law enforcement training emphasizes center-mass body shots until the threat is stopped.
47 likesHaving said all that, this incident was nothing short of a murder. The shooter manufactured the situation to produce that horrific result. My heart goes out to the victim and his family.
The MOST dangerous!
4 likes@Bob 1 Yeah, that's kind of a comforting stereotype for Brits to fall back upon when contemplating American culture. Betrays a total lack of understanding in the subject and a snide unwillingness to actually try and comprehend it. But I bet it makes all your friends nod sagely in agreement when you say it at teatime.
32 likes@Vance Palizzi You're peeing against the wind with this guy. All he's doing is trolling you to keep you spinning.
7 likesEspecially when you arm them
1 like@Taylor Libby Thanks for clarifying that. I know absolutely nothing about guns. But yes I guess you're right. Even after being shot the adrenaline is still running high and the person could continue to attack. When I was young I was chased and hit by a car and it broke my leg. But I continued to run home on it and only felt the pain when I reached my house and safety. Yes I agree with you regarding the incident being murder.
14 likes@John Doe How so? Please explain why you think this. Or have you no argument to put forward and are just trolling trying to get peoples backs up?
3 likes@John Doe Your argument is I am wrong? Super intellectual argument there. Great insight!! Lol
14 likes@1onefix1 all i got from that was "poor me,poor us,we are the victims" White men are NOT the victims. Anti-white movement is not a thing,people are just tired of the bullshit and are finally calling them out. This guy gets out of his own car which was his choice,starts yelling at the wife with the kids,over a handicapped spot which was again his choice. And when the man saw him yelling at his wife and pushed him ,michael played the victim and shot him.Getting pushed doesnt earn a death warrent. Sorry bout it🙅
30 likes@OspreyBravo18 100% agree otherwise your only move is to flee and shoot if trapped.
1 likeContrary to popular belief, a man, black or white who has gone out to see who is shouting at his wife , who is being aggressive towards her and ...oh...carrying a gun...her partner shoved him - did not PUNCH him (which I suspect he well could have done and decked our white 'victim' ) - he was killed with the wanton disregard of an idiot with a gun. The footage shows the maximum aggression shown by the victim was a shove - not a punch - and backed off when he saw a gun - the sentence was correct and a father and partner lost his life.
36 likes"popular belief"... I thought 99% of the population knew about the "cornered rat" effect.
6 likes@Vance Palizzi He is cruel and most probably a coward but the victim's actions were pretty cowardly too (leveraging his relative strength to 'win' the argument) and above all, stupid. In a situation like this you have to leave the antagonist an out - a way to retreat while retaining some pride. Otherwise if you get a coward/someone vicious/a narcissist etc then you are inviting something like this to happen.
13 likes@19 66 - Says the guy who wasn't shoved to the ground by an attacker.
5 likes@BiggestFoot Shoving a person backwards onto asphalt can kill them very easily. The video clip does not include audio, the black dude did not appear to try to de-escalate, he went just as cock-strong as the white dude, and up the pyramid they went. If the black dude survived the confrontation, you can bet your ass both of these men would be locked up.
33 likes@Bob 1 The the British navy orders a fresh batch of L85's. Who dies? "More guns less deaths" sounds a lot like you misconstruing someone else's statements and twisting them into your simpleton's worldview. "I don't need to comprehend stupidity because I'm not stupid." That's really funny, you know. Smart people have an easier time imitating stupidity than the stupid have imitating intelligence. A fool requires a wiser man to have fooled him.
13 likesYes,it's always the seemingly least likely to resort to deadly force that need to be watched out for.
1 likeAgreed
1 like@Sean Gilbertson then you lack self control and maturity. A man is capable of deescalating a situation.
17 likes@Sean Gilbertson and with your kids in the car hell yeah?! Thank you! I would want my man to get that random dude at my window away from me and my children too.
11 likes@Emmanuel Prikas such a great point!
1 like@BiggestFoot Absolutely right.
0 likesOh yes!! They are the most dangerous.
1 like1966 I haven’t even watched the video yet but yup fuckin spot on he is
0 likes@Sean Gilbertson using a firearm was an unnecessary escalation. As was pushing the dude from behind. I think acting as if he did nothing wrong is the point of contention here. No he should not have been shot. Also they shouldnt have parked in a disabled parking place without a permit or start hitting someone for a verbal altercarion
26 likes@Sean Gilbertson Just as being shoved to the ground in this case doesn't justify deadly force a few choice words doesn't justify getting hands on with someone. If someone is going to go around body checking strangers then they should be prepared to face the potential consequences of escalating a verbal confrontation to a physical one. You don't know them, you don't know what they're capable of or what lengths they're willing to go to. It is the lesson that should be learned from this.
22 likes@Torchy Brown Pointless question... The question is essentially already answered in his initial comment, which is a resounding no he should not have been shot.
1 like@Sean Gilbertson and that would be a very stupid thing to do, but whatever your preference is... (as you can see, this guy did exactly the opposite of protecting his family, he got shot in front of them bc he pushed some psycho)
8 likes@Sean Gilbertson there is a difference between victim blaming and not provoking. And please do not tell me that it is ok to change a heated argument into pushing bc it is not. Until the pushing nobody was threatened physically, they guy was not even invading the personal space of the woman.
19 likes@Rocky Waskahat Because attacking a guy way smaller and older than you is really brave right? Obviously shooting was excessive but the dead guy is not blameless. He'd still be alive if his reaction wasn't instant violence
25 likes19 case in point: current US President.
2 likesTrue. Its like they don't have time to do any rational thinking; or PTSD where they CAN'T think rational. He should have minded his own business. Such a sad situation all around.
2 likes@1onefix1 well the one with the gun was actually the one that uncontrolled emotions, no impulse control and actually using trained strategies but changing them to fit his motives. The victim was unarmed. The guy with the gun was the starting aggessor as he started the confrontation. There is ways to say to people to not cause a confrontation. The guy with the gun actions was that to cause a confrontation. Why would anyone walk around a car that has a woman and children in then start yelling at her.
12 likesHe could have asked did you know your parked in a disabled spot. A polite way of informing the person, they might have forgot to put there badge on display or they might just simply not realise. I know this happens as im disabled and yes disabled parking does get abused but you can educate why these parking stops are needed for people with disabilities so they know for future
@Random Name yet the guy with the gun said he carried a gun to protect his family but thats alright?? Are you kidding me??
4 likes@Stoic Observer yet American police don't have this as a tactic but other countries do. Strange that.
3 likes@Random Name the guy with the gun was the starting aggressor, he could have not got involved and report it to the shop. It's like he was out to create a confrontation as he saw it was a woman with kids. He could have done an interaction without the aggressive behaviour.
11 likesThe other guy came out walked up to him saw he wasn't stopping or leaving. Nobody knows what he said to the guy with the gun to try and de-escalate the situation prior to pushing him. But the guy with the gun should have walked away but he didn't, he also didn't care about the woman's personal space but did when it was his own.
The only criminal was the guy that shot someone who WAS walking away.
@Random Name the guy pushed the guy to defend his family.
6 likesThe guy with the gun would have just drawn his gun, which is worse?
A guy looking for a confrontation with a woman and her kids. Starts telling her about the rules of parking. What if she had been the one to come out of her car and then shoved him or hit him with the car door as she was stepping out?. What would his reaction be? Given his history of 4 attempts at pulling his weapon on 4 people, one being a young mother (similar to this case), i don't think we ever want to know that answer.
16 likesHe had 2.5 seconds to asses the situation. He already verbally stated how much distance/safety the other guy was between him. He states the guy was coming forward but as stated in court and in the interrogation backed up by CCTV, clearly shows he was already taking 3 steps back and headed towards the store. After 2.5 secs (which i would imagine is all he needed to steady his arm and pick the target area to fatally kill him.) he took the shot. His intent was to kill.
@OspreyBravo18
0 likesThat's not a bad idea.
@Taylor Libby
6 likesI gave you a thumbs-up on your comment Taylor but if you're asking, if I had a choice where I'd rather be shot center-mass wouldn't be the place. Seems to me all these shootings on TV that have resulted in fatalities have not been of the leg variety.
@mhern57 Have to disagree with you there- a leg shot will kill more easily than a torso shot, depending on placement of course. Wounds closer to the torso have a greater chance of hitting major arteries that are next to impossible to close up outside of an operating room. And the theory of "just winging them" to stop an attack has gotten a lot of people who believed in it killed.
4 likes@Taylor Libby
7 likesWell Taylor I agree with you that a leg shot can be pretty devastating and life-threatening for sure. But I just Googled and I don't necessarily believe everything Google says but Google said a headshot is most fatal followed by, they called it a body shot. So that makes a leg or arm shot around third or so. So I I guess if you're out in the boonies somewhere and get hit in the leg pretty bad you could bleed out before help arrives but in the city if you can get someone to wrap a tourniquet and get you to the hospital you have a pretty good chance. But the idea that cops are trained to shoot center-mass until the threat has means a lot of these cops are shooting four five or six times whether it's justified or not. Survivability at that point is fairly nil. Shoot the hell out of my leg and I'll take my chances.
@mhern57 Of course a head shot is the most fatal. It's also the most difficult target to hit on a human for a bunch of practical reasons. That's obvious and, I assumed (so that's my fault), not part of the discussion we're having.
3 likesAs far as Googling this information goes, I agree with you about treating Google info with a grain of salt. It would be interesting to drill down on the information and find out exactly where those "body shots" happened. My suspicious is that a large percentage of those would actually be in the joints closer to the extremities, i.e.- shoulders and hips close to major arteries and blood vessels that are very difficult to tourniquet off in the field. I think you're underestimating just how quickly a person can bleed out from an extremity wound even in a major city close to a trauma center. People are both a lot more delicate and surprisingly resilient all at the same time. Sometimes people survive despite no realistic probability, sometimes they die from the equivalent of a papercut.
About the specific tactics involved, well I'm not trying to be an ass about it but a threat isn't over until it's over. Maybe shot #1 wounds but doesn't stop/kill and the person is still moving forward. Same for shot #2. Shot #3 is the fatal one, but the person isn't down yet and is still coming but doesn't actually stop until shot #4, 5, or 6. And there are any number of other officers shooting also, so multiply the shots. It adds up quick. Not advocating this, just saying that I can see how it happens.
Ask me where I'd prefer to get shot, my answer is still that I'd prefer not to. ; )
@Taylor Libby
5 likesIt's not oart of the conversation. You're the one talking about it. I asked Google which is more deadly a center mass shot or a leg shot. It didn't answer me. It said head 1st (duh right? It's so duh I'm surprised you'd waste your thumbs talking about it.) Then body 2nd. At that point I had to assume the leg or arm would be 3rd. I was just passing it along. Anyway, I saw your crazy long text and wasn't interested enough to read it. You've worn me out. You win, leg very bad.
@David Stephens Well, the judge was a brilliant jurist and thought Drejka was the violent one.
0 likesthe coward blindsided a guy and it turned out to have been a very dangerous thing for him to have done. you're right, just not in the way you think you are.
5 likes@Sean Gilbertson "victim blaming", "racist".. I see you have rehearsed the scriptures of the church of progressiveism very well: all opposing viewpoints can be dismissed as a form of hatred/discrimination. You check all the boxes, don't you?
16 likesMy dad always taught me the most dangerous individual you will come across is not 'billy bad ass' in your face but a coward in the bushes.
7 likes@Juan Valdez Your father was correct!
4 likesI don't believe in good and evil but damn cowards cause so much damage it's terrifying. They'll do anything to not suffer for 1 second more than necessary.
4 likes@Bob 1 thanks for fighting the good fight bob. Proud to have you as my uncle. 🇳🇿
2 likesOnly if you give him a weapon that doesn't require physical strength and skill.
2 likesBob 1 you said it: “as a British man” ask the Cubans, Venezuelans and North Koreans and see what they tell you. 🙄🙄🙄
5 likesAnne MacLeod this is my thinking. He was acting all entitled from the beginning. I don’t think it necessarily has to do with the race of the guy that was shot, but if it would have been another white dude he would have done the same thing.
2 likesOf course, it doesn’t mean it wasn’t wrong. He should go to jail for what he did.
@Randummm Funniest Comment of the month and true!
0 likesI know this crazy idiot that bad mouths me. I know I could smash him but his crazy mind will have him burn my house down and obsess on revenge. Yes, a terrified coward is truly dangerous. It's not worth all the skirmishes. It takes a brave man to walk away. Especially if you have a partner and kids. Well stated mate
4 likesIf i could like this comment twice i would have, or even 3 times!!!
0 likesThats what heros are made of
0 likesWhen I was younger I would always come home with stitches. black eyes, and bruises from drinking and running the bar scene. My dad had a favorite saying he would regularly recite to me, he wouls say, "There are two things that aren't long for this world, a mean man and a fat hog". He meant that a mean man would scare someone enough to kill him. A scared, desperate person is unpredictable and very dangerous.
3 likesYep. Look at mostly every police shooting.
0 likes@Keyboard Warrior FACTS 👊 your the only person in the comments that I've seen who brought up this point.
2 likesSpence in this case it was
0 likes@Jason Henry your right about that.the prosecute pointed it out step by step closing statement.
0 likesBut he was also violently attacked by the perp. Im
0 likesAnd blindsiding somebody by shoving them down from behind isn’t cowardly at all, right?
4 likesSean Gilbertson even if she started it?
7 likesSo basically your position is “my girlfriend gets to do whatever she wants and nobody gets to call her out on it, and if they do I’m going to hit them” lol sounds reasonable
Would he have approached them about the parking spot if he wasn’t armed? If you want to look at it that way, would the victim have pushed him to the ground if he knew he was armed? That kind of logic leads to a circular argument.
2 likes@Sean Gilbertson He wasn't the victim he assaulted him first. Michael was the victim.
0 likesA possible threat, someone hitting you in a dangerous neighborhood.by a GANG BANGER.
0 likesEmpties clip of my .44 Desert Eagle
goes and gets a sandwich
The only coward I saw was the man who blindsided him with a vicious blow. Not man enough to do it face to face
3 likes@fnp9 Melton What we learned is if you meet someone's aggression with higher aggression they can't overcome, instead of fleeing, they can murder you and scar your son for life, and some rando on the internet will think that, to some degree, that it's just "what you get". I get that you think they're both "idiots" but I think we should be able to come to a point and say where something ended is so unjustly removed from where it started that any conversation about the preceding wrong is petty at best.
3 likes@RealityCheck1993 I don't thinks it's ok, at all, that the guy was shot and killed. I do think, like most people, that it's unreasonable to park in a handicap spot, put hands on people for words, shot people who are not a threat. I only point out that after watching the video and how it played out, you would still put hands on him...learning nothing from what you just watched. But you feel the need to inject poor reading comprehension huh
1 like@Sean Gilbertson Why? Just get between them and let him yell at you instead.
2 likesIt's not about cowardice. It's what is more likely to happen when someone is in a high-anxiety situation and hasn't had formal firearms training to know how to deal with that kind of situation. Even then, unless you've been in that situation, you don't know for certain how you will react until you're in it.
1 like@Sean Gilbertson as we just saw in this video, shoving a stranger to the ground for arguing with your woman is just as much a stupid decision as the guy who pulled the trigger too quickly. It could be argued that assaulting someone was the stupider decision because that guy is dead. People need to stop letting their emotions dictate their actions and, instead, engage their brains.
6 likes@Sean Gilbertson no, if anything should be banned, it's people who don't think before they act.
4 likes@Sean Gilbertson what does race have to do with anything? Are you one of those people who calls everyone a raaaaaaacist all the time without reason?
4 likes@Vance Palizzi I believe the shooter really believed the other guy was going to continue attacking him. We have the benefit of seeing the surveillance video after the fact. It's easy to say we wouldn't have done the same thing, but you really don't know until you find yourself in that kind of situation.
7 likes@Bob 1 you are correct about one thing: you really don't understand the importance of bearing arms. It's best to remain silent about things you don't understand.
2 likes@Anne MacLeod aiming for an attacker's foot or leg is something that only happens in movies. Anyone with any training knows you always aim for the chest. You're also incorrect about "winding other people up, then killing them when they respond back"... the armed man wasn't involved in a confrontation with the other guy until the other guy suddenly shoved him to the ground for no logical reason.
3 likes@Bob 1 you don't know as much as you claim to. All of the types of shootings you mentioned are a tiny minority of shooting incidents. The fact is that 2/3 of gun deaths in the U.S. are suicide.
4 likes@Anne MacLeod A lot of people are calling the guy a coward for firing his weapon. Even though I believe he fired prematurely, the fact is that he did fire only a single shot. As soon as he saw the assailant was not threatening him anymore, he stopped. In highly intense situations, people often continue pulling the trigger, which is frequently necessary to stop an attacker, for the reasons you stated.
3 likes@Leon R. your over-simplified version of events makes you come across as being a simpleton. Is that what you were going for?
1 like@Jill Kramer you seem to think that physical assault is a reasonable and logical action to take when two other people are arguing. You might want to rethink that.
5 likes@karah storm Physically assaulting a stranger is a very stupid thing to do.
5 likes@j9 Phoenix there is nothing called "maximum aggression," nor is there a legal difference between a shove and a punch. It's assault, either way. And it was a stupid move that he paid for with his life.
5 likes@David Ng correct. One never knows who they are messing with. The intelligent action is to de-escalate and remove oneself from the confrontation. Too many people have emotional reactions in tense situations instead of using their brain to act in a logical manner.
4 likes@Zeno's Grasshopper arguing with a woman and her children over a parking spot is a very stupid thing to do🤷
6 likes@Keyboard Warrior I was losing hope in humanity until I read your rational comments. Thank goodness there are still some logical people in the world.
2 likesElizabeth so are you saying you prefer a man who is ruled by random emotion, or are you saying you prefer dead men?
1 like@mhern57 no one who knows anything about guns is going to aim for a leg. Ever. That's only in the movies.
2 likes@Bob 1 we "Yanks" aren't wrong on guns. You simply don't know what you're talking about.
4 likes@Bob 1 gun violence in the U.S. has been dropping for a long time. When you make the correlation between New York banning guns and crime dropping in the state, you are not proving causation.
4 likes@Bob 1 you clearly have no understanding of the Second Amendment, and if you think the U.S. has a "bad gun problem," you are very misinformed. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid.
4 likes@karah storm brilliant.
1 likean armed coward.. extremely dangerous.
2 likesThat’s not contrary to popular belief 😂
0 likes@Guitar of Destiny so you think hes justified?
1 like@Maxum Absolutely. 100%
0 likes@Guitar of Destiny rewatch the closing statements and youll see in no way was he justified. if u still think its justified i want to hear why
1 like@Maxum haha "I wAnT tO hEaR wHy." How does it feel to want? I don't owe you a YouTube comment debate. We disagree. Now move on with your life. Lol
1 like@Scribbles exactly
1 likeYup, their week ego skyrockets causing neurotic reactions.
1 likeOnly when they have a gun. Good work, United States.
2 likesLol yup have you seen American cops
1 likeYeah.....big cowards always be blind side shoving you to the ground I agree.
3 likesao el haha
0 likesDing ding ding
0 likesTrue. Look at Nicholas cruz
1 like@Lord of the Harvest or pushed.......bayjones
0 likesThats the only reason he owned a gun
1 likeWe get to make the decision after careful review tho...this guy had maybe 2 seconds. Gotta take that into account at least.
1 like“With a gun”
1 likeWe don’t have guns in the UK for a reason and thank god for that.
2 likesabsolutely spot on! Powerful lesson
1 likeSo true especially when on an armed beer run.Rich
0 likes@Guitar of Destiny yeah whoops don't drop the soap
1 likeHe was pissed off not terrified.
2 likesYes you are so right, watch the movie called blue steel with Jamie Lee Curtis.
1 likeEh nah, Lashing out is a last resort. While it's true cowards tend to jump to the last resort conclusion faster, They also lack the confidence to follow through.
0 likes19 66 Right on the dot!
0 likes@Guitar of Destiny the guy has a record for pulling guns on mothers in front of her children all you holier than thou types saying "thats what they get for resorting to violence" seem to forget the dude is dangerous and has a history of this dangerous behaviour
5 likes@Bob 1 why do you brits always think your soo much smarter for not having guns. The second amendment isnt primarily about fighting our government before it goes rogue its an agreement that says you trust in our abitly to handle guns the second you take that right away you are effectively saying "you are too dumb to think and act for yourselves so we will do it for you" and that is something no foreigner seems to understand Americans dont want to be beholden to an almighty government who you can't question or criticize and whom thinks for you that is why we defend the second ammendment so hard
3 likes@Bob 1 just because thats what you are more comfortable and used to seeing doesn't mean its better people who want to hurt other people will always find a way for example people in prison without access to real firearms still find ways/weapons to hurt people with
2 likes@Bob 1 and way to miss the point, it isn't entirely about the guns its about not allowing a federal government to encroach upon or God given and unalienable rights
0 likes@Bob 1 No fool god given implying everyone is born with them and not just because the founding fathers said so as in you are born with the innate right to defend yourself and speak your mind as all human beings should be and not because the government says you do
2 likes@Bob 1 One more thing the term is called god given rights because the founding fathers were trying to illustrate that they are not the people granting us these rights but these rights are the right of every man because they are God Given, they are innate rights.
1 like@Bob 1 it makes sense in the context of forming a new country that wasnt supposed to be ran by an elite ruling class or monarch, when you consider the rights kings and old countries would take away/not give you, they use god as a way to appeal to everyone not to appear holier than thou, are you done pretending like you're smart yet?
3 likes@Bob 1 why are you so hung up on god Ive literally not said a word about him they used the term god given rights so that people like you in the future couldnt find a way to take them away from of us cuz we have plenty of people who think like you here in our own country
2 likes@Bob 1 you jumping to conclusions about my faith makes me believe you just assume anyone who has an opinion that's not yours is wrong
2 likesit doesn't matter how old something is if it applies in the modern day should everyone lose the freedom of speech just because sometimes some people say bad things? Should no one be allowed to have kitchen knives just because someone had murdered another person with one at some point in time
3 likesSean Gilbertson that’s awesome, same mind set and probably the same outcome. Did you learn anything here
0 likesThats probably the smartest thing I have read in a YT comment section
0 likesSean Gilbertson hope you catch lead
0 likesVance Palizzi haha
0 likes19 66 if though it’s fictional, tour comment makes me think of Arturo from Money Heist, dude was screwing up everything but, was a coward and still is but, he’s manipulative
0 likesEspecially when you live in a country with such insane gun laws!!
1 likethey are the most dangerous thats why we have so many stabbings here most ppl dunno how to fight but everyone carries a knife to defend themselves -.-
0 likes@B S the "victim" had a history of starting shit and waving his gun around. The "victim" started shit with the woman in the car, yes the other guy escalated things by shoving him to the ground but if you watch the video who did not start wailing on him. The conflict was over but the "victim" out of malignant anger pulled out his gun and aimed. The other guy backs away as the "victim" takes a aimed shot. Can't say he was in fear of his life he threw that defense away in his interrogation also in the state of Florida if you pull a gun you better fire it immediately or else it's brandishing a firearm which I argue he did when he took aim
1 like19 66 that’s only true in countries where dangerous cowards have access to guns. Over here people aren’t killed over parking spots. And, no, they don’t just use knives. And the homicide rates aren’t even comparable
0 likesI can’t possibly the first person to think, “like Trump?”
1 likeGood point. 👍🏻
0 likesSean Gilbertson ya that worked great with prohibition! All that happened was the criminals still had access.. and guess what would happen with a gun ban? The same!!!
1 likeAutoInfanticide 👍🏻
0 likes19 66 I know just look at cops
0 likesJordan Peterson a famous psychologist says this alot, someone who is dangerous and knows how to control themselves is alot less dangerous then someone who is simply harmless, weak or cowardly.
1 likeA strong person will confront you and give you a chance to back down especially if they are moral, a weak person will wait until your back is turned.
👏 exactly
0 likesSo, If the husband came out of store and seen his wife get pushed by the parking lot enforcer, could the husband pull out a gun and shoot him ?
0 likes@Guitar of Destiny Uh so like I agree that people shouldn't respond to words with senseless violence, but at least in this case he responded to physical contact with senseless violence.
0 likesif they’re at a significant advantage they’re extremely dangerous but if actually placed in a dangerous situation they would fold in every way possible
0 likesNice one.
0 likesB S If the “victim of assault” was begging for it and harassing and verbally assaulting a woman and children then yes absolutely we will call that “victim” a coward all day long
0 likesJoanie Bologna 🤦🏾♂️
0 likesOctowuss 😢😂😂
0 likeskarah storm The murderer was actually trespassing because he was banned from that store for harassing other customers and pulling guns on them..he had the cops called on him several times..he was an absolute menace to society
2 likesDavid Stephens So then why did the guy pull out a gun after he couldn’t handle the violence he provoked?
0 likesSharia LaBeouf 🤦🏾♂️
0 likesSnEaKeR S33kEr84 There’s a reason no one brought up that OPINION 😂
0 likesAshley Powers No where near as cowardly as being armed while verbally attacking women and children
0 likesDPofEternalnessity He’s so much a “victim” that he’s in prison for murder..makes sense 🤦🏾♂️😂
0 likesNic E your flawed logic would be hilarious if it wasn’t so idiotic..no wait it’s both 😂
0 likesCass Camden 🤦🏾♂️
0 likesMaxum You are absolutely right
0 likesScorch428 No..he really did not..the act was premeditated the victim just happened to give the murderer his fantasy
0 likesWe've all seen them at school. They fear everyone and then build up an anger and try to lash out at people for no reason. This guy was just going out looking for trouble to show he's more powerful because of his weapon.
0 likes@Guitar of Destiny This is what happens when you pull the trigger on a man already backing away from you after you pulled a gun out on him. Micheal was completely justified in pulling his gun out, but there was zero excuse for actually shooting and fucking killing a man in front of his family.
1 likeThe guy was still a punk for tackling him and initiating the violence.
1 like@Bob 1lol yes irresponsible firearm handling/storage is the guns fault. Guns arent dangerous, idiots and criminals with guns are. And i personally think wed be doing infinitely more good focusing on stupidity and crime than guns.
0 likes19 66 nothing is more scary than the rage of a nice man.
0 likesVery true
0 likesSO true. I had an ex bf, whom I loved—
3 likesBUT... he was a maaaajor puss/kinda had this cowardice?
He looks really tough. He had tattoos, he would wear a lot of muscle tees and cargo shorts/baseball caps...
But again.. he always carried his gun around! When we first started dating he thought I had a guy over, which I did not, however he came in my house with a gun! And made a comment like “oh I thought I was going to have to—“ and I’m like... “😳.......yeahhhh”
I was an inch taller than him at 5’8. I feel like shorter men have this cowardly way..much worse than others..only when they’re insecure about it. This guy actually reminded me of him.. not in look, but in the way he went about things. Way too quickly with no rationale. I do not believe he is innately evil. I just think this guy made really bad decisions, when carrying.
he is not a coward
0 likesThe attack on the shooter was also an cowardly act, the victim made sure he could push the shooter over before he could see him coming.
1 likeI swear the YouTube comment section is a mine for great quotes
0 likesWell put
0 likesSpoken like someone who has never had to take a life. I spent 8 years in the Army and was deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan. You may think that it is a cowardly thing to do to shoot someone, but it is the opposite, it takes a lot of courage to be willing to pull that trigger. I cant tell you how many friends I saw get killed because they didn't have the courage to actually pull the trigger. I don't think that Drejka was justified in shooting McGlockton, but I also believe that Drejka believed that his life was in danger. When your body is being pumped full of adrenaline your mind is clouded and you don't recognize things that you normally would, this is called "the fog of war," and because of this the brain can easily perceive a step back as a step forward.
2 likes@Vance Palizzi You are right, the shooter did the wrong thing, but like I said in my reply to the original comenter, an adrenaline surge that you are not used to experiencing can easily cause the brain to misinterpret things like McGlockton stepping back as him stepping forward.
1 like@Anne MacLeod Shooting someone in the leg is not always a good option. The vast majority of modern bullets (with the exception of hollow points) are designed to ricochet around inside the body and take you out of the fight. So let's say that Drejka had shot McGlockton in the leg. If Drejka shot McGlockton in the upper leg, the bullet could have EASILY struck McGlockton's femoral artery and McGlockton would have bleed out. If Drejka had shot McGlockton in the foot the bullet most likely would have ricocheted up his leg and into his knee and completely destroyed it.
0 likes19 66 29:17 I couldn’t see this argument actually working out in court. It’s clear he was simply shook up, scared and cowardly reacted with his trigger.
2 likesAs the defense, wouldn’t they just say he’s answering these questions based on his current emotional state? He’s no longer in “danger” of getting beat up, and can easily analyze a justifiable reaction in that situation. His rational thoughts after being taken out of the situation vs his reaction in the situation don’t align, because they’re two different mechanisms
Johnathan Hautz you really just said “The Fog of War” pertaining to a man being pushed in a gas station parking lot.
0 likesSeen a lotta dudes go because they thought somebody was a scared
0 likesI think we see that a lot in the police force. Oop
0 likesOmg your icon made my heart stop for a second because I just saw it out of the corner of my eye
0 likesTo be fair.. I think most of these concealed carry people are cowards. Not all, but most.
0 likesCool, you get what’s coming to you then
0 likesLa Doña Mariposa Vigilis “and/or” lmao 😂 I identify as a lamp
0 likesYou quoted contrary to popular belief. Sounds like Dave Chappelles lines
0 likesespecially in the US, where they can arm themselves to the teeth!
0 likes@mhern57 I got shot twice in both of my thighs. Bullets shattered my right femur...worst experience ever!!!! Literally missed my artery by a hair!!
1 likeVery well said. Another important fact is when someone says, “I am not afraid of you” That’s an indication that all is not good. This guy was complaining that his right arm hurt, got a bandage, but after 15:25 he’s moving his arm without pain. The problem here is he thought that since he goes to this store so often, he has the right to enforce order. He got pushed for probably disrespecting Bro’s lady, and because he felt disrespected pulled his gun and fired, without mentioning a word or warning. I personally believe that if someone pulls a gun on me and I don’t have one, I would hesitate and observe my situation. This is plain rage and he should go to jail. Fact is you should pick your own fights. To think of shooting someone over a parking place, or anything that you don’t own, and possibly killing them or wounding them, possibly gone to jail for murder, is plain STUPID!! But then again with the gun laws and the hate in America, it should be expected.
2 likes@Bashir Ahmad
0 likesYeah I've learned since that I got that one wrong.
Only if they have a gun.
0 likesAlthough I have witnessed this type of behavior before in the silverback cage at the zoo
0 likesCowards are sensitive ;meaning your ass is in danger. Captain America thought he could get away with it. Haha I work with people like him.
0 likesGuitar of Destiny yeah your right but jail is what happens to a man that uses a gun in irrationally. They found out her was riding around threatening people in traffic. Just saying.
0 likesGuy wasn’t using his muscle memory or grabbing frenetically for his gun. I bet he wasn’t terrified. This was just a ego battle.
0 likesA coward with a gun is one of the most dangerous people. I’m a 5ft tall white girl, my friend almost shot me unlocking and going in to MY house because he was startled. Fear is dangerous.
0 likes@La Doña Mariposa Vigilis just OR. Man or woman
0 likesWell put.
0 likesThats only if he has a gun., which unfortunately every lunatic can get in the US.
1 like@Emmanuel Prikas guns may allow weak men an edge in a fight, doesn't mean they are smart though.
0 likesSo true...... so fucking true....
0 likesYou forgot “with a gun”. A terrified coward with a gun is actually very dangerous.
0 likesGuns are very good at doing there job. Get one
0 likes@j9 Phoenix He pushed him hard from behind and the man fell onto concrete. People have died hitting their heads on the ground from a push. Keep your hands to yourself.
1 likeNot in most countries outside USA, as we don't carry guns around!
0 likes@fnp9 Melton I took that to mean he would defend her. But yes.
0 likesSounds like a lot of cops lol
0 likesLMAO. Your profile pic trolled me....I literally took my mouse arrow and went over it multiple times :). Im just imagining the amount of others that have done this.
0 likes@Jormangandur83 Deductive reasoning by authority...justifying ones mistake by coming up with a label/name for the "others" actions to justify horrible behavior with your behavior...aka the process of killing actual authority, and advocating for tyranny...piece by piece. It has to start somewhere...oh, is this the responsibility of authority...to keep yourself in check? Hmmm.
0 likesI like your avatar looks like a harmless grass spider
0 likesA cornered animal is the most dangerous you can have but only dumb animals jump into a corner
0 likesdude everyone knows this, it's not "contrary to popular belief"
0 likesOnly in a country which gives sells firearms like selling candy to kids. Guns are banned in the UK this crime would never of happened if it wasn't for the US horrificly lax gun laws
0 likesEverybody called him the coward of the county 🎶
1 likeIm sick of the presure over people to be brave... specially over men. Im ok with poeple that dont play hero and prefer to avoid confrontation.
1 likeSpence I think “Is” isn’t so far off the mark in America.
0 likesWord
0 likes@David Stephens yeah because it's super peaceful to get out of your car and scream at them...
0 likes@muddler minnow he had threatened someone with a gun 4 times before this. He was just looking for an excuse to use it. Stop justifying murder.
0 likes@angelfire532 white guy started+ escalated the situation first. Dont victim blame.
0 likes@Zeno's Grasshopper lol "acting out of emotion" while you defend a guy who had 4 previous counts of threatening with a firearm and got out of his car to yell at a woman and her kids over a parking spot...😆
2 likes@Zeno's Grasshopper he was backing away.
0 likes@Zeno's Grasshopper he started the confrontation.
0 likes@Zeno's Grasshopper and you think murder is a reasonable action to take when someone is backing away.
0 likes@Zeno's Grasshopper you defend the murderer by saying "you never know what you would do in that situation" but scold the victim for acting out of anger after seeing a random dude step out of his car to yell at his wife. Nothing but wind whistling between your ears.
0 likes@Zeno's Grasshopper there arent.
0 likes@Aniquin the aggressor was Michael, getting out of his car and causing a confrontation over a parking spot.
0 likes@lahokc59 racist.
0 likes@Derp stay in your car and don't yell at people over a parking spot.
0 likes@Taylor Libby What's this weird defensiveness over guns? This video is literally an example of what they can, and frequently are, used for by the morons who are permitted to carry them.
0 likes@S. A. The guy was only backing away with a gun in his hand. That's clearly indicative of non-agression. These people were actively attempting Kyle's life, but because the guy with a glock was backing up for a uninterrupted sight picture outside of arms length, he surrendered, even though he was brandishing a gun the whole time.
0 likes@Bob 1 Illiterate? Really?
0 likes@Bob 1 The people who came up with evolution say in their own works that they intend to use it as a weapon against Christian society. Far before any data was on the table (as if you can prove the unfalsifiable reductios of evolution with data, lol) and to this day, they believe in the greek creation myth, and will perform every mental gymnastic and every manipulation of the institutions they control to keep up their pathetic farce. Information Science has debunked evolution. Period. Just assuming that magic lightning made DNA happen isn't science.
0 likes@Bob 1 You don't know what god given aka natural rights are. "Who decides" means you don't know. Determining these things is a simple logical process. You have to kill me, or physically maim me to prevent me from exercising my rights. The very fact that such actions remove somebody else's rights means it's isn't one's right to murder someone. It's not because a law was written that I have rights. The law protects and recognizes the universally applicable and and absolute truth of natural rights. Universal and absolute truth is what determines what does and does not originate in the mind of God, and through logic, we share in it.
0 likes@S. A. I got your post confused with something actually relevant. "Just stop fighting in the middle of an adrenaline rush, man." You got some sorry ass expectations. It's called fight or flight for a reason. Not everyone is so mentally disciplined.
0 likes@S. A. Why should someone be allowed to illegally park in a handicapped spot without expecting old people to scream at them? What did they think was gonna happen?
0 likes@S. A. He might have done so, but was that information included in this video? You could just provide a few facts and some analysis, but instead you want to morally admonish year-old comments that you already know don't have all the facts.
0 likes@Lewis H Frequently compared to what?
0 likes@Lewis H "Weird defensiveness"🙄🙄 What's with the gaslighting and trying to restart a discussion you weren't part of near on a year after the fact? Everyone knows that lonely trolls need attention too I guess.
0 likes@Lewis H 🙄🙄See above reply. Thanks for doubling down and proving my point. Have a great day😁👋
0 likes@Emmanuel Prikas Weak and impulsive, no thought to consequences. When you pull a gun, your opponent will no longer be a threat. There was no need to shoot to kill.
1 like@Keyboard Warrior stop defending a violent murderer over a damn parking space.
0 likes@Keyboard Warrior it doesn't matter whether confrontations are legal or not, the point is, he instigated a fight and murdered somebody over a parking spot.
0 likes@Keyboard Warrior and you came to reply, what's your point???
0 likesThe most dangerous..omg
0 likes@Sean Gilbertson he was yelling at his woman...over a parking spot. The guy started the whole thing...then shot a guy " in defense"
1 like@19 66 I know the word war sounds oh so big and scary to you, but that concept is in play whenever someone is under the influence of adrenaline, as was just painstakingly explained to you.
0 likes@Mathias B If the guy hadn't pushed him, no combat would have been initiated. Up until that point, nothing that happened was against the law, outside of parking in a handicapped spot.
1 likeA terrified coward with a gun you mean. It's the gun that is dangerous
0 likes@Keyboard Warrior did you look into your crystal ball and saw that if the guy hadn't pushed, "no combat would have been initiated"? Maybe you could look in there and find yourself a brain.
0 likes@Keyboard Warrior I've known immigrants with a 3rd grade education who can string together a better, more coherent argument than this. You're making a joke out of yourself.
1 like@Keyboard Warrior True, but we aren't talking about legality. We are talking about initiation. Number one, All because the guy was within his legal rights to berate and tell off the driver doesn't make it right. Number 2, because he CHOSE to berate and tell off the driver in the way he did he got pushed. Thus, because he chose to be an asshole and do what he did he began the domino effect that led to him murdering somebody. This isn't a subjective argument. Its 100% objective. He decided to park illegally, get out of the car, and berate someone for parking illegally. Lmao.
2 likes@Mathias B Initiating a verbal conflict and initiating combat are two different things, regardless of the law, unless you don't think people should be expected to have self control.
1 likeHe is literally a predator that succeeds by his victim's lack of self-control. His ASSAILANT CHOSE to push him, that's what led to the murder. No combat = no murder. If this stuff is so objective and you're so confident, what is systems analysis and how do metaphysics apply to this discussion? Since you wanna talk about a first cause.
1 like@Mathias B Whether or not you think he invited it doesn't matter, that's subjective. Specifically, it is subject to how one views rationality, which is, to an extent, a matter of opinion. Attacking an old man because he's yelling at your wife, and not even caring whether or not you're setting yourself up to win the fight itself, much less avoid jail time (If this fight didn't result in a gun being pulled, the guy who died would have gotten charges, fyi.) isn't exactly rational. That's my opinion.
1 like@Mathias B The incident was initiated when the first couple entered the parking lot. The man didn't get shoved for exercising his right to be an asshole, he got shoved because the person who shoved him chose to do so. Throughout this discussion we've had to break this one incident down into stages of 1, the people entering the scene, 2, the initiation of verbal conflict, 3 the initiation of physical combat. This assumes that these are separate sub-incidences subsisting within a greater general incidence, which is why you yourself had to refer to it as a SEQUENCE of EVENTS. Whether or not you think circumstances permitted that he be pushed, or that he deserved it is irrelevant, This "sequence of events" would have left no one dead if everybody kept their hands to themselves. Your assertion that the initiation of a verbal altercation was the first cause of events that lead to death of a person is wrong, flat on its face. In no circumstances can that be correct. People don't die from verbal altercations. Other things had to happen that are dependent upon the choices people freely make. The only way you die from a hand-to-hand fight, that escalates to guns, is if COMBAT is initiated, not mean words. You are mathematically, strategically, ethically, logically, wrong.
1 like@S. A. Well since you entered the thread with the greater preponderance of evidence, knowing that Drejka gamified the situation in order to try getting away with murder, how is he going to do that attacking first in close quarters, exactly?
1 likeSince the alternative situation is that Drejka attacks first, which, according to his MO, he's not gonna do.
1 like@S. A. You've put yourself in a position where you have to argue that if the deceased didn't attack first, Drejka would have. Meanwhile the evidence you have available directly disputes that. It's not a defensible position.
1 like@S. A. FFS you can't even win a game of debate Nim YOU started. You're gonna call me brainless.
1 likeCovid19 fear-mongering has proven that, beyond a shadow of a doubt.
1 like@Bob 1 I'm American and I can see it! We're not all brain dead. Maybe one day our generation or our children can do something about this...
0 likesYou are a coward and that animal who when he saw the gun regretted for a few seconds and run inside the store. I hope the same happens to you because these animals do not discriminate between whites. You can be from Iceland and still an oppressor in their eyes. An ignorant lowlife scumbag with nothing to lose is actually very dangerous, especially when you don't defend yourself.
0 likesJohn Doe idk if u see this boss but ur comments got 0 likes and this Anne MacLeods comments got 15-20, I think the people have spoken
0 likes💯
0 likes@mac diggity he didn't stutter. A terrified coward will always be harmful to those around them. A coward will not try to help but just think of themselves. Wouldn't they?
0 likes@Anne MacLeod Exactly, on all points!
0 likes@Sean Gilbertson everybody will still have guns bobo lol
0 likesPeople who carry weapons tend to be looking for truble. Even when they clame that they only do it for "self defense" whitch is a lie. You carry weapong to GET in to trubble. By not carrying them, you'll do everything possible to avoid it in the first place.
2 likesDo what ever on your property, but keep your weapons at home.
Depends on the coward. Is he scared of death or is he scared of causing death/confrontation
0 likesYep
0 likes@Bob 1 I don't understand the knife culture in UK but I guess we all have our issues 💀
0 likesFacts
0 likesThen he is not a coward...
0 likesThen they're not really a coward, are they.
1 like@Sean Gilbertson why we need to ban democracy
0 likes"So you shot him-" "Well I have a permit ✨💅🏻😇"
0 likes@La Doña Mariposa Vigilis *spider
0 likes@Chris C I love that song 😍
0 likes@Mai Waifu why was I summond to this racist,toxic testosterone, gun nuts, pacifist lunatics, obvious trolls and victim blaming dumpster 🔥 🔥 fire?
0 likesDamn right, that’s why I always got my gun on me
1 likeYes
0 likes...when you give him a gun. That’s why only calm, responsible people should own guns.
0 likes14k likes. Legend
0 likesYup
0 likesGotta be honest, he convinced me in the first few minutes
0 likesLove the profile pic
0 likesEspecially in a country where guns and accessories are widely available and accessible. Never know what wanna-be Marine nutjob is packing heat with an itchy trigger finger who also thinks he's the town sheriff.
0 likesvery true.
0 likes@The Artist Formerly Known As Shitlord tbf, it was snowing... She may not have known it was handicap 🤷♂️
0 likes@Sean Gilbertson Really? Did not learn from this, did you?
0 likes@mac diggity more like is...
0 likesA specially if they have a gun. One more reason to change the laws regarding guns.
0 likesLet's see how brave you are when being attacked by a rampaging wild animal.
0 likesGimmie a K
0 likes👏🏼👏🏼K
Gimmie a Y
👏🏼👏🏼Y
Gimmie an L and an E
L 👏🏼👏🏼E
What's that spell?!
Kyle Rittenhouse.
@1966 only if hes in a country where hes legally aloud to carry a gun ?!!!
0 likesIf I give you a cell phone?
Do you think you are more or less likely to make a phone call?
Guns dont kill people,
People Do
@P L wait a minute. You actually believe this event was real? 🤣
0 likes@sammy Words don't hold power action does! Words can be said but without a movement or affirmative action words are just words in the end. However they sure can bring some love and hate.
0 likes@Guitar of Destiny America right now! lmao following the words of trump and get charged as dt's. Silly pants's
0 likesIts a well known fact; If you corner a rat, it will attack & go for the throat.
1 likeEXACTLY they have a high fight or flight response and you don't know what they will do.
0 likes@Sean Gilbertson they banned firearms in the UK and now knife attacks within black males are at an all time high, should they ban knifes as well?
0 likesEspecially if they have a gun
0 likes@Sean Gilbertson you are calling others cowardly while you pull out the race card and claim you are joking when you face confrontation about your flawed worldview. How brave you are
0 likesWell if he is armed yes cuz other wise he won't do shit
0 likesYou just acquitted him as not guilty
0 likes@Mer Der Right. That is why I said keep your hands to yourself.
1 likeNailed it
0 likesYes that is well known
0 likes@fnp9 Melton 357 learned nothing
1 like@Sean Gilbertson hell naw
0 likessaid the spider
0 likesThats a good description. Well stated too.
1 likeyour fucking pic scared the shit out of me
0 likesi tried shooing that spider 2 times 19 66 lol
0 likesi hate that profile picture
0 likes@Sean Gilbertson banning guns won't solve the problem. all that'll do is put more people in prison.
2 likesif a criminal wants to get a gun illegally; they will. especially in this country. the United States is already too far down the gun rabbit hole to climb out now.
@Anne MacLeod Your comment leads me to believe you don't shoot guns. You're taught to aim for center mass when firing. Shooting at limbs leads to missed shots on attackers and stray bullets.
0 likesEdit - Sorry missed your dialogue with Libby.
She is also correct about the leg shot opposed to body shot if she meant the pelvic shot. If you get the femoral artery in the groin it's over.
Take out the word "terrified" and read the sentence again. It takes a coward who starts a fight with a woman just sitting in her car.
0 likesyour profile picture made me a terrified coward omg why would u do that
1 like@singactjoke i agree
1 like@Sean Gilbertson You are right, people shouldn't correct other peoples behavior otherwise the person will yell at them and their low iq thug partner will shove them to the ground. Fantastic logic.
1 like@Sean Gilbertson
0 likesMe too. Especially if he's particularly aggressive
@fnp9 Melton
0 likes"Idiot". Coward. Or Evil man.
Evil is a strong word, but my definition of it includes: knowingly and willingly harming an innocent human for no reason that would be considered reasonable by any normal person, and deriving a satisfaction, or aiming to derive satisfaction, from this.
@Cross Terminal down here, in the bellows of the comments, I'm going to help you.).. you are correct, of course, but on paper only. In the real world stupid or evil - its the end result that holds the most weight. Stupid and evil are two roads to the same house. At the very least, conduct yourself accordingly.
1 likean armed terrified coward, yes.
0 likes@fnp9 Melton
0 likesTl;Dr version of my comment: An evil person is fully aware and intelligent about their evil actions. An idiot is not.
That's the destinction.
Hm. Idk. I myself have committed to what I describe as evil actions. Those times the evil person knows full well the situation they're in, and exactly how their actions will directly influence those around them and the innocent in negative ways that far exceed the positive consequences.
The evil person, or at least me, gets a kick out of how unjust the action of harming an innocent unjustly is. The fact that the person didn't deserve my crime and that I knew I was aware of that was what made me want to show it to the world and rejoice in it.
A stupid person does bad things because they're emotional or doesn't know better. Neither of those are particularly evil. The only exception of course is if what I previously described as evil is the emotional motivator for the idiot. But even then, such cunning requires... cunning, which is a trait with "smart" in its definition.
@Cross Terminal it does not matter to the victims.
0 likes@fnp9 Melton
0 likesI don't know. The victim can get confused if the attacker is just pure evil. "Why would anyone stab me like that? He didn't have any reason to."
It can take longer for them to process it
I thought a spider was on my phone thanks to your profile picture. That's a nice trick. I think I'm gonna use it on my facebook.
0 likesNothing is more terrifying than a mouse in a corner. Idk who or what said it, but after being bit several times I agree
0 likescowards are the most dangerous people on earth.
0 likesThe most dangerous type of person.
0 likesCorrection: A terrified coward WITH a gun is actually very dangerous (example: a vast majority of these cases with cops in recent years)
0 likes@B S A grown man who can't defend himself is indeed a coward
0 likesi can’t believe he took a fathers life over a parking spot when there were spots right in front of the door
11 likesI almost feel bad for the guy. He's been taught that this is all right, and he actually feels justified in shooting an unarmed man and putting himself in the position to do so. I have a gun, so I'm in the right, don't challenge me.
10 likesReplies (1)
Good analysis, this is very much a human disorder pride over humility
0 likesDrejka was sentenced to imprisonment for 20 years on October 10, 2019
5 likes48:19 Damn. From here, the prosecutor calls the victim "Michael" 7 times. RIP Marquis
13 likesIt’s funny how he forgets how much his arm hurts when he’s emphasising a point.
1702 likesReplies (32)
Meh. If it were a random conversation that would be one thing but he knows his future is on the line here. I'd put up with a little temporary pain to express myself as clearly as possible in that situation, wouldn't you?
24 likes@thrdeye no. Not unless I was faking it.
72 likesI was thinking that too.
1 likeAnd that pathetic sling he made with his shirt at the start, which he doesn't need any more half an hour later lmao
10 likesFunny how you omagine things, because its obvious his arm hurts and there is camera to prove it.
1 likeHe was hardly even hurt. !
4 likes@Cricket talk and chat surprising because camera clearly shows he was assaulted from the back and physically kicked to the concrete. He could had easily died there if he hit his head, but survival instincts kicked in and he was not only able to land on his hand but to answer to the attacker, albeit in wrong way, for which he is receiving a fair sentence.
4 likes@draqon ofwhitestars the only thing hurt was his ego. And he disturbed there peace instead of minding his own business he was to busy being the parking officer. He should be minding his own business was he clearly thinks he is the stores own parking inspector. Yes the poor dead guy over reacted to . But he didn’t deserve that.
11 likes@draqon ofwhitestars there was never a kick he pushed him. And he obviously didn’t mean him to fall on the ground . You obviously don’t know the difference between a push and a kick. He didn’t hit him in any way shape or form. Or he could of hurt him much worse if that was his intention
6 likes@Cricket talk and chat didnt mean him to fall on the ground? Oh i guess some dude coming from behind you and striking you down on concrete is totally fine.
2 likes@Cricket talk and chat WRONG. If the guy who was assaulted on the back didnt fall on his right hand, but fell on his head on concrete, the assailant would be the one serving 20 years in prison. Attacking someone from behind and assaulting them to the ground is not OK, it is physicall assault and the guy who fell has every right to defend himself. Unfortunately for the defender, he chose wrong method to do it and will serve the punishment to full extent.
2 likes@draqon ofwhitestars what part am I wrong about the part that if he didn’t have a gun on him they would of both gone home safely but him with a bruised ego . I’m sure the guy that actually died had made his statement. Shove off. He wasn’t looking for trouble trouble came to him. !
2 likes@Cricket talk and chat Come on. That push was aggressive and he landed hard on asphalt. Yes, he should've minded his own business, but had he not been blindsided and pushed to the ground, none of this would've happened.
2 likes@Cricket talk and chat You are wrong on the part that it is OK for anyone to physically assault a person and throw them down the ground. That is not ego, that is deliberate physical harm being done to another human being and that gives right to defend.
1 like@draqon ofwhitestars the guy was trying to run away he backed off. The poor black guy was innocent. The only thing he did wrong was protect his family . He was like wtf going on here. And he over reacted. How was he to know he was going to get killed because of a small shove
2 likes@Cricket talk and chat this isnt about black guy vs white guy. This is about being physically attacked and slammed on ground deal. Both men overreacted, both men were punished for it, neither is good.
1 likeYeah that right arm came outta of it's sling real quick 🤣
2 likes@thrdeye ....no because then obviously my pain isn’t that bad and I was just trying to act.
1 like@draqon ofwhitestars being pushed = worse than being shot and a totally good reason to shoot someone? What(?
1 like@Anonym saying one thing and another person shoving words in my mouth i never said do not equal. Shoving someone from the back down the ground with intent of physical harm is NOT OK and the guy had every right to defend himself, was a bullet shot the right way to respond? NO NOT OK. The problem I have here is that people are defending the guy who shoved response as adequate...IT IS NOT.
0 likes@draqon ofwhitestars who said it’s ok? But it’s no reason to shoot someone, THATS what it’s about. If you can’t understand that I’m sorry.
1 like@Anonym and if you cant understand that a person has a right to fight back for his life if his life is threatened with physical assault, than thats bad. No not by shooting obviously.
0 likes@draqon ofwhitestars he got pushed, not beaten
1 like@MrJamberee in usa if you are white man, you are automatically prejudiced against.
0 likes@Cricket talk and chat How many complete strangers have you pushed to the ground in a concrete parking lot?
0 likes@Cricket talk and chat People from different backgrounds live under different codes of acceptable conduct. That's why when you meet a complete stranger in a place you aren't familiar with, you should presume that you don't know the way he or she will react. From a common sense stand point you should be weary of strangers and try to be peaceful if possible.
1 like@Josh G that would be none.! I wouldn’t ever do that I’d try a different approach I’d say mind your own business. ! Stop playing parking ticketman when your not.!
1 like@thrdeye he had a scratch on his arm lol
0 likes@thrdeye the thing is he didnt do it temporary. When the officers were out of the room, his arm was suddenly okay.
0 likes@Anne Hedonia the mother and kids were blindsided when they tried to have a calm day, but no, a random white man with a gun (which, if he had gotten it properly, he would’ve had reason to fear his life. People who bear firearms know to always AVOID ALL CONFLICTS, NOT COME LOOKING FOR THEM, which is exactly what michael did.) thought he was a police officer, and decided to shout and take pictures of a random mother w her child.
0 likes@draqon ofwhitestars except, this really just boils down to race. I bet you all my money that if the mother was a white woman w her white kid, this situation would’ve NEVER HAPPPENED.
0 likes@draqon ofwhitestars but marquice didnt have the intent of physical harm, he had the intent to get a man who was threatening his wife and kids AWAY from his family.
0 likesimagine if he did get away with this. he would still be a total loser. 'oh, yeah. i shot a guy because he pushed me. and he pushed me because i was yelling at his wife, over a parking space. yeah, i didn't fear for my life. why are you walking away?'
27 likesReplies (1)
Exactly. He's so unbelievably pathetic and sad. This was the best thing he had to do with his time after retiring young and inheriting a bunch of money.
2 likesthat prosecutor deserves an award for his systematic dismantling of the plaintiff's "case"
1 likeNot enough people are taught that the only reason a weapon comes out in a situation like that is for shooting. The second it's out the situation escalates to life-and-death for everyone involved regardless of the state before that moment. Fight or flight is a thing but you can't truly flee from a weapon pointed at you, you must be allowed to flee. So if you take it out you must have made the decision and been willing to kill. Any hesitation means you could die. Whether you're the only one with a gun or you're matching someone else's gun.
8 likesThis guy was just a coward picking pathetic fights and the first time he gets put in his place his reaction is 'I'm gonna kill you'. He pulled out prematurely, saw he didn't need to shoot, and shot anyway. The hard shove was uncalled for. But going straight to nuclear in completely silence was beyond uncalled for. Glad this guy got locked up a long time. You can slightly make a case for being blinded by pain and fear here but you can't at all say he wasn't looking for trouble with the comfort of knowing he's armed.
Replies (4)
What are you trying to say? That he shouldn't pull the gun? Or that as he pulled the gun, now he can start kill everyone around? No matter pulled or not, you have to keep evaluation situation and only fire it when it's absolutely necessary, not just because you escalated situation by pulling it out.
0 likes@Nikolay Antipin It's not a laser pointer. It's not a warning tool or deterrent. I'm not saying you can't stop and put it away. I'm saying the only reason you should be taking it out is because you're past the point where you'd be stopping. If some bystander saw him on the ground pointing his gun at the guy and then pulled theirs and shot him, they'd be acting in an okay manner.
0 likesYou evaluate things and determine you're going to have to shoot. That's the only time when you bring it out and shoot. Yes some situations would be a little different. The guy in this case simply did the complete opposite of what should have been done.
@Nocare I agree on most of it, but not on statement that "it is not a deterrent". It certainly is in many cases, you just don't know upfront will it work as deterrent (95% of times) or will escalate it even more (5%). But if it is clearly working as deterrent after you pulled it out - you should NOT fire it.
0 likesI agree he should not even pull it out. But also even after he did he should not have fired it as it clearly worked as deterrent and there was no risk to his life from a guy he killed.
1 likeCan I just say I love how in response to the cop saying he believes that drawing your gun after being knocked down is a matter of opinion, this guy who ISN'T a cop tells him "Well that's not true, that's in your training, so..."
0 likesThe amount of people that don't shut up and just say "lawyer" is astonishing to me
1484 likesReplies (23)
They think they know better
60 likesThose are probably not worth a video ofcourse.
136 likesExactly what i was thinking. People are being way to friendly with detectives and end up screwing themselves over lmao
48 likesWhile I'm not saying he shouldn't shut up and ask for a lawyer, I think it's safe to say even the best lawyer wouldn't be able to dig him out. He was literally caught on video initiating a conflict and once he was shoved, he pulled out a gun and fired on a man who was backing up after seeing the gun.
66 likesThe reason he didn't is his confidence; He felt like what he did was the right thing and he was confident the police would feel the same way.
17 likesA lot of people are worried that asking for a lawyer will make them look guilty, and they underestimate how badly they can screw themselves over.
22 likesmy mother told me "they will keep you in arrest and wont let you out until you admit you are guilty!", spreading panic, anixiety and doubt
5 likes@Aaron glad he didn't ask for one, he deserved what he got.
3 likesThis guy genuinely thought he did nothing wrong so he did not see the need
5 likesHe genuinely believes he is innocent. He thought he would tell his story and go home.
2 likesShocked me too
0 likesIt's just so happens these people were caught doing some criminal activity. You know, commiting crime by itself is usually not the brightest thing to do.
1 likeThey haven't watched JSC
0 likesThey believe if they don't ask for a Lawyer that it will make them look innocent.
2 likesSurvivorship bias
1 likeWhy would he record a video about the people that do? I'm sure many take that route, but it obviously wouldn't be enough to make a video on.
0 likesThey only know as much as you tell them. Keep your mouth shut.
0 likesIkr like so many people would be free if they just STFU. My dad was a lawyer and he often won the ones where the dude said lawyer. He also hated police body cams. They invalidated any police brutality claims and also recommend the shooters face when cops where attacked.
1 like@Chloe Marlowe My dad was a lawyer and probably could have gotten him a great plea deal if he wouldn't have talked. Lots of clearly guilty people get good plea deals because they STFU instead of confessing.
0 likesSome of em think they can get off without a lawyer.
0 likesand thank god they don't court would just be so much more back and forth lies.
0 likesI had noticed on those to catch a preditor interrogation videos the ones that asked for a lawyer got 7 years plea bargain the people that sang like a canary got 14 years plea bargain. Which shows under any criminal accusation you can half your sentence by keeping your mouth shut
0 likesCops lied to him, they didn't say he was under arrest
0 likesHe was a time bomb 4 times he has pulled his weapon on people
6 likesI carry all the time and have been hit even wearing my gun but I knew
The person didn’t intend to kill me or really cause great bodily harm
I’ve never hid behind my weapon and you must have the ability to
Mentally see though a situation because you shoot to kill not wound
Your first thaught shouldn’t be your weapon that’s why you train and be able
To react in 10ths of seconds
Is it just me, or could have all of this been avoided if the shooter would have just shook his head and carried on with his business?
3 likesI'm a shooter myself, I know when and when not to pull.
And now, two families lost two fathers, brothers, uncles. Lives wasted over pride.
Replies (1)
Clearly. Drejka had no business playing parking inspector.
1 likeHeartbreaking, dying in front of his son😡
5 likes23:22 I have never been in that situation before... well maybe you shouldn’t be carrying a gun with intent to use it for self protection if you never properly trained when not to use it. This is when carrying for protection becomes a danger for everyone else. If you are willing to walk around with a gun, you must be willing to take responsibility, in whatever form it comes. He wasn’t prepared for that.
0 likesMichael Drejka , " After I was deployed to the parking lot, my mission was to take out illegal parkers' in order to neutralize the parking lot area'.
9247 likesReplies (70)
😂😂
41 likesExactly who employed him to be the sjw on duty
167 likesThen I would rendezvous back to the landing zone were I would meet the law enforcement to administer my briefing.
323 likesmb Safronovitz yeah, this cop-loving gun owner is just like an SJW 🙄
88 likesYeah, like who made him the parking police? Unless youre disabled and needed the parking bay yourself, its no ones business who has a placard or not. I have a placard and never use the disabled bays. Seems the other bays were closer than the disabled one anyway.
81 likes@blue ears There were so many spaces available, she was sitting in the car with the kids, he just ran in for a sec, and then gets murdered over this. Above and beyond sad and unbelievable but a highlight of what goes on here in America
118 likesUsing my tactical weapon. Negatory, no contact. Switching to secondary.
50 likesSo many people in the comments making excuses for people who are parking in spaces that are DESIGNATED HANDICAP ONLY. Meaning people who take those spots who aren't disabled, nor have they even gamed their way into getting a disabled placard at very least, they're just blatantly parking in a spot designated for someone with actual physical disabilities that prevent them from being able to move quickly or efficiently and without a ton of effort. That's a selfish, narcissistic, uncaring asshole move, regardless of how short a time they were gonna be in there or whether their kids were with them or whether parking spots were open all around them - which just makes them look even worse and like even bigger arrogant, ignorant jackasses for deliberately taking a handicap spot when you're surrounded by close, unmarked spots yet you choose to take the spot that a handicapped person might need. And to do this in front of their kids is disgusting and teaching them awful, disrespectful behavior.
38 likesNone of the excuses are anything more than just excuses. Excuses being made for really shitty, ugly behavior. And no, they didn't deserve to experience violence like that, especially in front of their kids, but they also shouldn't be absolved of their assholish behavior. Stop being inconsiderate pricks and you'll have a much less likelihood of ending up in a confrontation with one. You simply can't deny that this confrontation never happens if they didn't arrogantly take the parking spot of someone who actually needs it. Don't give maniacs like Drejka a reason to direct their ire and frustration with life at you.
Lmaaooo
3 likes@blue ears His calling was to be a parking enforcement employee.
11 likes@mb Safronovitz I dont think you know what that word means
8 likesseems about right!
0 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likes😂
0 likesxDD
1 like2 fucking funny!!!
0 likesAffirmative
3 likesLOL
1 like@Lilac Rain Indeed. He's self-righteously making people miserable in the name of some stupid, irrelevant cause nobody asked him to get involved in. On an abstract level that fits the SJW descriptor pretty damn well.
17 likes@Vestin Yup
4 likes@White Alliance If only he said that during the interrogation, i would have broken out the popcorn...
4 likesCart Narcs gone evil.
1 likeExactly, this case is the epitome of "Mind Your Business". If it isnt causing immediate life harm be on your way!
12 likes@Perplexer1 what kind?
2 likes@Lil Ant your name says it all
1 likeTattoo Madness is Sadness
2 likesMission Accomplished
0 likesLmfao 😂
0 likes"...It is not my problem that I also parked illegally, but it was all for the mission. i am not at fault for my actions because I was simply helping the society"
13 likesEven though he made his own parking space. In Oregon, if you have small children, you can get a Handicap Plaque, to make it safer for the family. What a shame.
0 likes@Perplexer1 What do school shooters look like if you don't mind me asking? lol
1 likeThis says it all.... the same type of people protecting parking spots are the same type of people who would walk by if somebody was getting raped right in front of them, as long as it's not a white person they don't care....I wonder if it was a white person in the car if he'd go robocop on them?
6 likes@Zach D I have fish foot, totally paralyzed, I DONT CARE AS MUCH ABOUT IT AS YOU OR HE DOES! its obnoxious but they'll get caught BY POLICE WHO CAN FINE & CHARGE THEM not CITIZENS POSITION to POLICE NON VIOLENT ISSUES like speeding or parking, etc. People need to mind their business unless its violent.....
22 likes@NA Aaron thank you!!
0 likesnegative
0 likesAnd he had German Shepherds.
1 like@Zach D it's not up to some random guy to check that though. Imagine if one of them WAS disabled and they had a guy interview them on it who was ready to KILL if they weren't. Nobody was saying that it's okay to park in disabled parking spaces but it's not that deep
4 likes@Zach D I mean, everyone was still in the car but the dad. I'm sure if a handicapped person were to pull up they would just move. The family was only there for a second anyway to buy snacks.
5 likesThey would have inconvenienced someone for, at best, 2 minutes. That and there were plenty of other spaces around anyway so what's it matter?
Also, we should kill people for parking in a handicap spot for 2 minutes while you run into the store? Wut.
LMAO
0 likesi surveilled the situation, assessed the perimeter and any unfriendlies I then proceeded to field strip my cigarette and put on my thousand yard stare face and moved ahead with the mission at hand.I also pee'd a little bit.
2 likes@Zach D hey, you just don't kill over parking lots. Argue ok, but you don't shoot near KIDS and IN PUBLIC without warning
8 likesLOL
0 likes@Zach D lol wtf an essay about a parking lot
8 likesYou’re delusional
Loooooool, funniest comment here
0 likes🤣🤣
0 likes@Lilac Rain Great, then all of you insane SJW should looooove him.
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likeslmaoo
0 likesWell ya, it was his store, after all. Went there every day. Had to protect it and all.
2 likes@The little red haired girl from across the street love u
2 likes@blue ears it is prohibited to use that parking space, If you see someone violating this, there is nothing wrong with pointing it out in a civil way. I really wonder why do some people need to be on one extreme on another? Haha
1 like@Lilac Rain people who cant understand sarcasm
2 likes@Sue Zuccati People start thinking about “tHe SjWs” and lose all critical thinking ability lmao
2 likesDelusions. He's thrash.
1 likeHad a date that talked to a driver who parked in handicapped spot to protect his Porsche & driver assaulted my date. Later I found that his mom is disabled & now I am so I am proud he stood up for these parking spots. At that time I was as puzzled as many as these comments r! Hope y'all don't know how important these parking spots r!
1 like@Zach D Thx for being thoughtful! Drs r not writing pain meds anymore & every step is so painful, glad someone cares about us!
0 likes@Phyllis Irwin I think everyone knows but also realize there was no one in the parking lot, they had a car full of kids, he just ran in to grab something so I don't think his life should have been taken in front of his wife and kid over a parking spot. Geeze
0 likes@Anon we can be pretty annoying lol
0 likes@Zach D You're really playing this up like spending 2 minutes in a handicap spot in a mostly empty parking lot can tell you enough about someone's character that you can then assume they kill puppies or something in their spare time.
3 likes🤣😂🤣 exactly
0 likes@Zach D go touch grass kid
1 likeThese comments are fkn 💀
0 likes@mb Safronovitz he employed himself
0 likes@Zach D Well said
0 likes...and he owns two German Shepherds; he would have fit in with Hitler's Brown Shirts.
0 likes@Zach D thank you , also why does the victim have to come out and push the guy so hard ? I mean he also could have acted correctly and contacted the police and everything that everyone is saying that the suspect should have done , the victim could have done all those things , but they were parked illegally like a bunch of assholes and knew if they called the cops they would get a ticket , so instead violently shoves a guy that could have caused serious injury , because of that this whole thing spiraled out of control , period , everyone take responsibility for their own actions , period .
1 like@ozzierabbit PEA, Parking Enforcement Agency, handicapped task-force unit
1 likeAnon so why watch Americans? Why come where Americans are sure to be? Just to post 💩 to get a rise? Gtfoh
1 like@mb Safronovitz I hate the fact that sjw is my initials
0 likesnononnononono LOOOOOOL
0 likesAnyone else catch during the interview when he tells him the family has been very descriptive about him as a person his facial expression and he mumbles "Oh, I've heard" ? The WAY he says it gives you a pretty good insight as to what type of person he actually is
2 likesThat prosecutor lawyer made some great points. Good job by him.
1 likeWell he had all the terms down pat even ones they didn't know "neutralize the threat" "21 feet rule" "force multipliers"? He figured the officers would relate to him like he is one of them
2 likesThis guy made me laugh so hard clutching at his arm saying how badly it was hurt and he could not move it. However it worked just fine when he drew his a gun took aim and fired.
2 likesMichael is the type of guy who joined JROTC in high school and made everyone salute him when he was in uniform.
1550 likesReplies (27)
lmao 😂😂
4 likesand he didn't join after he graduated because he said he would punch the drill sergeant in the face if he got his feelings hurt. 😒
53 likesI cant express to you how NOT surprised I would be if you were correct.
12 likesThis comment is too accurate. How do you know about these facts?! 😂
4 likesTyrone is the type of guy to push you on the floor because he has low impulse control.
9 likes@lol dunked on it actually does seem like he’s condoning the shooting for multiple reasons. One, the man’s name was not Tyrone and this person knew that. He used a racially stereotypical name to try and describe the actions of the deceased. The only people who use racially stereotypically names when describing the wrongful death of someone is someone who has some sort of prejudice. It’s already a stereotype that black men are violent so let’s not be obtuse. Joking about the murderer is perfectly fine because his actions were unjustified. It was not self defence. It was a reaction of anger. He was looking for a fight from the start when he started harassing this woman over a parking spot. Michael is the type of man to scream at a woman with children over the Mom trying a 2 grapes before picking which bag to use. He’s got anger issues. Markeis has just walked up to a man who was yelling at his wife, and pushed him. Was that a response of anger? Absolutely, but most men in these comments are saying they’d do the same. Are most men just angry little men who have no self control? Or do most men, like most women, feel protective over their loved ones.
26 likesI can’t say whether Holliday is racist, but I can say using the nickname Tyrone to perpetuate the violent black man stereotype desensitises the fact that a man was KILLED. He was not a threat to Michael.
@HLLDY who is Tyrone? Can you elaborate on why you’re using a stereotypical name? As opposed to the victim’s name?
22 likes@HLLDY big words from someone who listens to Iris by the googoo dolls... I would be quiet if I were you
9 likesAnd averaged about 16 minutes when they ran the mile
2 likes@Arek Pushing someone to the ground over a strictly verbal altercation is also uncalled for. Just saying. Anyone who says they would have done the same thing does in fact lack some degree of self control. Not excusing trigger happy’s actions, but an immediate violent response to a verbal dispute is absolutely 100% uncalled for and unnecessary.
3 likes@bw hah
1 like@HLLDY I hope you’re not married and if so I hope your wife never reads your comment knowing that if a man ever starts yelling at her with your small children with you nearby you’ll stand there and do nothing.
4 likesImagine being a grown man who argued with a woman in front of her small kids and then getting pushed by her husband who was unarmed and standing there and defending yourself with your hands they way it was intended instead of blowing the other guy away because you happen to be armed and too afraid to fight him like a man.
1 likeThese kinds of people are also the kinds that do become bad cops. I stand behind law enforcement %100 but people like this seek out positions of power.
7 likesYou mean he's just a kind of guy to wear a uniform when he's not supposed to
1 likeLads I’m not from the US; what’s JROTC?
0 likes@Jeremy Casey junior reserve officers training corps. Used in high schools to teach kids leadership and help them prepare if they decide to join the actual military
1 like@Jeremy Casey can also be a program in some middle schools too
0 likes@Christopher McLane cheers for clarifying I appreciate that mate 😬
1 like@Jeremy Casey Anytime!
0 likesI was in JROTC, and no one EVER did that in my school. I mean, we'd salute ourselves....for practice. XD
0 likesI'd be too embarrassed to go area making my fellow students salute me because of my uniform. Surprised he didn't get stuffed in a locker or teased relentlessly.
That doesn't happen. Any kid who tries that would get yelled out by the instructors.
0 likes@Yung Tux You're really overestimating shoving someone to the ground, buddy.
0 likes@Overly Aggressive Machine I think exaggerating is the word you’re looking for.
0 likes"You're disrespecting a future US army soldier" energy
1 likeHall monitor in junior high school.
0 likes"You're disrespecting a future army soldier" energy
1 likeThe prosecutor trying to run this back on the Curtis Reeves trial a few months back and failing miserably was nice to see.
1 like"So you just assumed he would finish the job"
2 likes"Any smart person would"
Any smart person would not shoot a man in front of his wife and children
Reporter: “Anything you would’ve changed?”
4 likesWhat he should’ve said: “I should’ve got a lawyer before speaking to police.”
Drejka's attorney was perhaps the least convincing defence attorney I have ever seen.
1 likeThat prosecutor did an incredible job of obliterating the defense's arguments... almost as well as Michael himself.
1913 likesReplies (27)
@Bubba master oof it’s embarrassing to be this wrong… yikes 😬🤡
83 likes@:I i punked that kalsimir kid out why would i feel silly
0 likes@Bubba master how does saying 'obliterating' shows your bias. Might be a strange choice of word, but shows his bias? Please educate me on your dumb logic. The op says nothing racial, yet you're the one who brought it all up. Idc about trump or biden or bla bla as i'm not from the USA (the only country you know). I pity you actually, go buy a map and see that there are more countries out there aside from USA so that could maybe stop you from bringing american politics to a random person on youtube who literaly never mention anything to give themselves away that they're american.
31 likesthe “michael mclaughlin” agonized the shit outta me
1 likeWtf is this conversation? Why yall still talking to bubba master obvious troll
4 likes@ancient lemon assuming everything is a troll makes the internet less fun for me
7 likes@ancient lemon you can never be too sure, because there are actual people like him out there
9 likes@Bubba master L human ngl
5 likes@Bubba master 🤡
1 like@Bubba master Touch grass x
2 likes@Bubba master its funny seeing all the likes of comments against you
4 likes@J that doesnt even make any sense lmfao
0 likes@Bubba master What is wrong with you? A man was killed and you bring politics into it. Have some empathy
4 likes@Bubba master or because the dude shot someone for no justifiable reason. The dude thinks it was his due diligence. This guy is literally animated in the fact that he does believe he is in the right , which shows how diluted his sense of the situation is. This dude only built a stronger case against himself, and on top of that he thinks the investigator / interrogator is on his side.
3 likes@Bubba master have your singular "yikes" sir 😬
2 likesYep
1 likeThat prosecutor explained it very concisely and put the jury into the moment expertly.
If you're the family member of a victim, he's the man you want in that courtroom, and he's the man you dread if you committed a crime and enter that courtroom.
@LJC Productions this is a line I will be borrowing 😂
0 likes@Bubba master i bet one day we get to see you in the interrogation room. Im waiting patiently.
2 likes@Big D I did the law aspect of the ciminal justice system. When I was started law school and even before that I did not want to be a cop/investigator so dont worry you wont see me in the interrogation room interrogating these people.
0 likes@Bubba master oh no i dont expect you to be the interrogating one 😂
5 likesI literally thought the prosecutor did a trash job, and i was like thank god he behind bars... but ofc opinions is subjective, and i thought he refuted a bit, but most of his arguement was just waffling about nothing :/
0 likes@Bubba master and he is, but that’s irrelevant to this comment babez
0 likes@LJC Productions c'mon, you know his sister-wife handles that for him.
1 like@Bubba master clown moment
0 likes@:I racist "hillbilly" though? Sounds kinda bigoted. Are you saying all southerners are racist or hillbillies or both?
0 likesAs f'd up as Bubba's comment was, it seems like it was factually acurate
@Bubba master go to bed old man. you have no power on the internet.
1 like@Bubba master lmaooooooo
0 likesIn sentencing, he got 20 years. His appeal to lower that was denied.
2 likesThe prosecution constantly calling Marquise the wrong name at the end was driving me insane
1 likeI know so many guys like him. Mr. "I gotta gun so no one can ever kick my ass and I can do and say whatever I want to people". They talk tough because they have a gun, but in a fight they are worthless.
6 likesHe was waiting for an excuse to use that gun and he knows it...
6 likesI can’t stop watching this channel! It’s like a Netflix docuseries.
2913 likesReplies (34)
Same, and honestly it should be a Netflix series. This shit is so crazy and interesting to see.
39 likesActually, I also can't stop watching dis channel
2 likesThose Netflix documentaries have done more wrong than good
10 likes@Dead Cowboy Netflix will ruin the quality, in my opinion! It'll be censored, unnecessary music will be added
29 likesHaha me too
0 likesTook the words out of my mouth. I finish an hour long interrogation video and end up clicking on the next one without hesitation😂
2 likesHave never watch an hour long on YouTube but watch 3-4 vids of an hour long from this channel I’m so interested and entertained the narrator did good job narrating and there’s no music on the background plus he is so detailed.
4 likesnetflix should coorperate with him
1 likeIt’s a great channel. I’ve been watching it everyday like you.
0 likes@J J Thats true that’s true
1 likeBut better
0 likesWait till you find @thatchapter 😳
0 likesMe too... I found this channel yesterday. Studying Criminology and this really helps to get some good knowledge out of these cases and classes.
0 likesI MADE IT GO FROM 1.1 TO 1.2K ISNT THAT SO COOK
0 likesCOOL*** not cook I ment
0 likesmeant****
0 likes@J J visionary 😂
0 likesi've been on a binge!!! ive even been telling my boyfriend about all of them like every day for the past week lol
1 likeHolly shit. This is so true. I hate the back voice over anything but still loving this channel no matter what. "Like and subscribe peeps!" Keep it going (:
0 likesIt’s like Netflix without the lgbtq brainwashing vomit
1 like@Dante Kenway what do you mean?
0 likesThis is better
0 likes100%
0 likesBeen binge watching this channel for a few days now.
I rest my case
0 likesomg same
0 likesIt's better than a docuseries
1 likeDang this it the most likes I’ve ever got on a comment and I didn’t even know lol
0 likes@Nagiwagi what you cookin? Some meth? Businesses? Thoughts? 🚀
0 likesIt’s better (and it’s free)! 😃👍
0 likesit drives me insane to people compare everything to netflix, or insist something be put on netflix. you must be paid to do astroturfed advertising for them. netflix is trash. all video content doesn’t have to be on that garbage streaming service.
1 like@J J exactly
0 likes@conzmoleman I just meant it’s really well done and high quality like it has some big backing. It’s a encouragement that the content is good not that it should be on that platform..
0 likes@conzmoleman
0 likesThank you!
True! And in true YouTube fashion, it killed it. :/
0 likesHow in god's name do you not have an attorney after you just killed someone on camera?
3 likesWhether you're in the wrong or not, always ask for a damn lawyer. You talk to the cops by yourself you're doing time even if you're innocent. Ask for a god damn lawyer you are not smarter than the law
0 likesThat was straight up murder, lock that man up for taking a father away from his kids.
2 likesThe only thing I agree with in the video is that he could pull his fire arm when getting sneaked by this dude BUT if I was in his situation I would pull it and let him know to get away from me without aiming it at him. Because once he got knocked down it didn’t appear to me that the dude was gonna attack him again. Once he seen his gun he was about to walk away. Then again I don’t think I would pull my gun in a situation like that cause even though the threat was there it wouldn’t be enough for me to pull my gun. Could’ve been avoided smh
1 likeHe says negative instead of no like he really thinks he is some kind of soldier reporting an incident
7231 likesReplies (47)
I think he thinks he's like on the level with the police. Like he's just another cop reporting to his buddies. It seems extremely socially awkward
1073 likesHe absolutely does. I live in an area FULL of these kinds of folks. They feed on a steady diet of Right-wing radio and TV, and combine a grandiose sense of self-importance with a finely-tuned persecution complex. I have friends and family just like this guy; talking to them leaves you with the disturbing sense that they are DYING for the chance to drop someone.
686 likes@Enclave Soldier That's not even close to what I said.
239 likesI spent 27 years in a cult. I know firsthand how indoctrination works. And in the same way that religious ideology can lead to extremism, so can political ideology.
Don't misunderstand - I don't for a SECOND believe that conservatives have the market cornered on insanity. You have zealots all over the place.
I do, however, have plenty of people in my life with a certain political narrative that sound exactly like Mr. Drejka. It's not hard to see how a constant reinforcement of that narrative can lead to direct action in the real world.
lmao so true
0 likes@JediNiyte fellow ExJW?
7 likes@Enclave Soldier It's all good. I do understand it's tough to convey context in a typed message, and for that I take responsibility.
9 likes~HUGS~
@Tom EvertonI didn't. If you'll read my second comment, I specifically laid out how it's a group of people I'm familiar with in my personal life that have a specific view on the world.
29 likesI personally think that most people - across the political spectrum - are basically decent. But we're all easily propagandized because of the tribal nature of our species.
All I'm saying is that the man in the video sounds identical to the group I happen to be familiar with.
@Enclave Soldier I wouldn't say "every". We don't live in a world of absolutes. And if you genuinely believe what you said then you have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe there's a higher percentage in the vehement Trump supporters, though still not *everyone*. But there's more variety throughout everyone who just voted for him in general. My parents alone disprove you. Not saying I agree with them just that not EVERYONE who voted for him wants a way to legally kill someone
14 likesAnd "neutralise", "one in the pipe"...
9 likesThat sounds terrifying.
0 likesOr maybe he just showing some respect to the officers hmmmm think about that for a minute.....
3 likes@Enclave Soldier every... Lol
0 likes@JediNiyte not just right wingers. there's a very specific demo the NRA has courted ....older, socially awkward, lonely men.....feeding them dumbass needlessly violent Michael Bay/Steven Seagal/Jack Bauer type shows and movies..... it's these older men, who somehow have failed at their own ambitions yet somehow have enough money to have a mini-arsenal of shotguns, assault rifles, etc.... their feelings of inadequacy force them to play rambo in shooting ranges and walk around everywhere strapped to the teeth.... these dudes, who didn't have the courage, intelligence, or mental fortitude to join the military or in law enforcement.... yet they are somehow allowed to walk around with guns on their hips .... these guys are everywhere.....
23 likesHappy LARPing around the 'hood.
1 likeForce multipilier 😂
1 like@Enclave Soldier "overexadurate"
0 likes@JediNiyte Ha, you tried and you failed HARD hee-hee!
0 likesLike Terminator lol
0 likes@JediNiyte thats crazy though
0 likes@Dr. Lex Winter crimes by the "left wing"? Like the Black Panthers, the Weather Underground? Those are the last "left-wing" crime syndicates I can think of and they were in the 70s. Unless you're trying to say ALL crime that isn't directly politically motivated must be "left-wing". And the statistics absolutely DO show that domestic terrorist groups are overwhelmingly right-wing. Multiple FBI reports have shown this since the Obama years. While the last major organized efforts were in the 90s (the armored car heist in Oregon, the OKC bombing), we have had plenty of people influenced by their rhetoric show up in unorganized events. Dylan Roof, the Charlottesville protest, etc. Many, many smaller less fatal incidents meant to harass and intimidate including temple and Jewish cemetery vandalism. Right wing rhetoric is on the rise here. No one feels safe because of it. It's an issue.
7 likes@Tommy steel ??? The Black Lives Matter movement is a protest movement to bring awareness to over policing, targeting and killing black people. It's a spontaneous movement that has been protesting changes since 2014. ANTIFA is some weird thing talked about on Fox News and by our president but isn't an organization. It means "antifascist", so any time you are fighting against a neonazi, or a draconian militarized police force or OUR PRESIDENT, you could be called Antifa. It's a series of tactics in RESPONSE to fascists. Fascists go away = Antifa goes away. I'm not saying people hurt during protests isn't "real" violence... but I am saying the militia group in the woods who has been stockpiling high firepower weapons for years and believes in "the White Replacement theory" is who you have to worry about, because they're planning something.
7 likes@Tommy steel Ps... "according to antifa"? Where are you getting this? Antifa is not an organization, they are tactics for fighting against fascism. If you meet a white supremacist tomorrow who wants to harass some black kids and you say 'No', that would make you antifa. So I don't get this idea that Trump supporters are being "targeted" by antifa. Doesn't make sense
5 likesIt's called respect...
0 likes@Tommy steel Who are Antifa? I already said: there is no organization called antifa. Antifascism is a movement or a set of tactics in the presence of those promoting fascist rhetoric. If you oppose racial injustice or are against jailing political opponents or fight for the equality of the working class YOU are antifa. Who is getting attacked (other than verbally) for supporting our dumb-as-bricks, divisive, corrupt, weak, do-nothing-but-blame-others, pushover of a president?
5 likes@Tommy steel Good. I'm glad to hear. Me too. Have a happy 4th!
0 likeswebnothing “Affirmative.”
0 likes@jegpad retreat, immediate threat
1 likeWhat's wrong with saying negative? It's the same as here
0 likesWhy are so many people obsessed with this? Who gives a fuck if he says negative instead of no?
3 likes@3D you didn't understand?
1 like@Joanie Bologna it is pretty funny how no trump supporters are irrational but they will come oyt of the woodwork to write essays about how THEY ARE TOTALLY NOT INDOCTRINATED AND THEY ARE ACTUALLY VERY SMART AND NOT AT ALL RACIST
4 likesThat’s what I’m saying like who tf he thinks he is🤔
0 likesRoger
0 likesHe's what I call a "military cosplayer". I am a little leery of guys that are always carrying a gun, like it's part of their identity. You know they aren't carrying that gun because they don't want to use it. Many of these guys are just dying to be a "hero".
2 likesHis lawyer - wavy lines means it’s not a completely accurate representation!!! It’s a video that is about as accurate as it gets!
0 likesHe's definitely a larper. As a soldier I've never seen anyone saying negative instead of no outside of being sarcastic
1 like@JediNiyte Only in America.
0 likes@jedi if you’re a progressive you’re still in a cult, you’d be surprised how many cults exist without religious associations.
0 likesSoldiers don't speak like this either, its cringy AF.
2 likesThe sign of a wanna be tough guy looking for an excuse to shoot.
1 like@JediNiyte They are a real life Boogeyman to me
0 likes@Cardin Cardini Right. Do NOT address women and children .
0 likesReminds me of that kid at school that would say affirmative
0 likesnegative.
0 likesyou're just bullying him for his usage of the word 'negative', probably don't deserve to be shot for that but it's the typical kind of aggression one experiences ,
0 likesOR HE HAS A CB RADIO...
0 likesPlaying too much damn COD or whatever these 30yo couch potatoes be on istg
0 likesOn one side i do perfectly understand thst sometimes you look at a situation in retrospect and realize you got it all crazy wrong.
4 likesI remember game of baseball when I was a teen, I confused one of my team members for playing the other team and hit the ball from their hand, only to proudly whatch my opponent making a home run.
It still creeps me out how I was able to not only confuse the easy rules of german version highschool baseball but also to feel like the hero for some minutes. I am the kind of person who gets everything wrong ALL the time.
Than I have a look on what is rooted deep in the white community in us and all over the world: "black people are gangsters"
I know consiously this is untrue. I even dated a poc guy, nicest and calmest guy i ever met. I would still cross the road if a huge black guy would head toqarda me at night. It is implemented in our heads that a character is worse the darker the skin is (starting with aladdin and lion kind where all good charakters are lighter coloured than the villians).
So I believe he truly was panicking. He was unconsiuosly racist thinking that his victim would come at him no matter what. Would kill him. He was scared.
But was he the victim here? No.
He got himself a gun permit. He qent into a store and purchased a weapon to carry along and to use if threatened. To kill.
He made the consious decision thst he would arm himself therefore he took on the responsibility of bringing a weapon into any conflict. He had the responsibility to make sure this weapon would not be used agsinst innocent people.
Than he startet the conflict. He felt the need to enforce the parking rules (which is ok in general, important even) but he admita he only did aproach the car because he was armed so he felt protected and he was facing a woman and her young children. Thats what gave him the courage, the fact thst he was an armed man going against a mom and children. He was sure to be winnning. But than he was thrown to the ground not feeling so big anymore and pulled the trigger because of what he thought he sees not what he saw.
He never took the time to ask himself: Can I be trusted with a gun? Am I the kind of person who can use a gun responsibly?
If you are to cowardly to approach someone over wrong parking without a gun, do not approach them.
This Is a pretty sad situation, The entire accident could’ve been avoided. Sure, They shouldn’t have parked in a handicap spot, but shooting someone is Way too extreme a reaction for being pushed down
0 likesThis guy was looking for a confrontation. At the end of the day, who cares if someone was parked in handicapped spot at a freaking gas station?
2 likes"The man that you shot is deceased" ...says thank you for telling me..😳😲 NO REMORSE WHATSOEVER...so SAD 😭😭😭
8 likes“Negative I applied Forced Multiplier”
4149 likesNegative I neutralized the threat”
“Negative I stood my ground”
This fool was so excited to be talking to the cops.
Replies (71)
He thought it would be all daps and handshakes. They were like nah dude you fucked up.
394 likes@Ra Yeah definitely. He thought they were all buddies. Which is a good one on the cops. He's way more likely to speak casually and not watch his words as carefully.
266 likesI hate this guy, he wants to be a victim so bad. Idk how the law is in america but here the only way to shot a person is in the leg twice . You have to have HUGE PROOF that you ACTUALLY WERE GOING TO BE MURDERED to even dare to shoot a person . Also here guns are illegal so...i think is better.
169 likes@Nyx Many people in this counrty use guns to legitimately defend themselves against violent criminals. Removing guns from our law abiding citizens would leave only the criminals with guns. This guy is a trigger happy nut, but don't judge all gun owners by the actions of this guy. Americans will never stand for the government to take our guns.
75 likes@Rhea B well, my country is a lot more peacefull, but the thing is, here nobody has acess to a gun. Only the police, so there is no way a criminal could buy one, there are no gun stores , not even online. But mabye i dont understand it because in the city i live the worst thing that can happen is to meet a bear random on the street. We had one seral killer in the 90' but he didnt have a gun, he just killed people with a knife. The only murders i heard of in the news had nothing to do with guns, never. Not even the police use them , and if they do, they shoot only in the leg. I know is more dangerous outthere but the thing is, if they were illegal , the rate of mortality will be lower. And what are the odds to have a gun on you when someone attacks you? What are the odds to actually have a chance to use them before is too late? Criminals kill more people with those guns than the number of people that save their lives with them. Well, it is anyways too late to make them illegal now.
103 likesit was self defense
3 likestheyre kindred spirits, after all
1 like@Nyx shooting someone in the leg is incredibly difficult and can be extremely deadly because there's massive arteries in the area and the gunshot victim can bleed out very quickly. If you're pulling a weapon in fear of your life you're aiming for the biggest target, the torso. But that's only if you're in true fear for your life.
13 likesThis isn't the movies where you can just pause time and aim wherever, if it was I'm sure most people would shoot knives and guns out of each others hands instead of ending a life, something 99% of gun owners in the USA hope to never do.
@Rhea B The main deaths are in cities anyways. Where I'm at this crazy stuff doesn't happen.
1 like@Gabby D no it wasn't. Self defense was over when he decided to walk back towards the store.
18 likes@Martin Øverby Guns aren't a luxury. They are tools.
3 likesDude is like he was on duty and now explains what happened to his supervisors
9 likes@ten i said i my country, where, again, only the police can use a gun, but still if they use it they have to plead for every single bullet. They have to first make a warning shot then they can use the gun to shoot , but they are not allowed to kill anybody, unless it will be 100% sure explainable in court. The leg thing and the warning shot is in the law i didnt make it
10 likes@Nyx dont shoot them in the legs. There are many many arteries and veins. Become more knowledgeable about using a firearm before you make statements like these👍
11 likesDwight Schrute
0 likes@Gwen hey i recognize you! you trolled that one thread calling everyone racist for saying 2 people look alike xD
1 like@Krubbe K hey aqwika
0 likes@Gwen hey, whats up? what is aqwika?
0 likes@Krubbe K our little secret
1 like@Gwen in my first comment to you i state "i recognize you" which would imply i can distinguish you from other asian people on youtube. think about it...
1 like@Krubbe K wow no need to brag. are you looking for a round of applause or something?
0 likes@Gwen nice banter... see you in the chats :D
1 like@Krubbe K i dont know who you are
0 likes@Martin Øverby USA is pretty much a country that being held together with duct tape. Sadly sensitive liberals and conservatives argue over petty bullshit. So change is really slow.
10 likes@Gary Garretson You don't really know socialism. America is far from socialistic. Just because the government does something doesn't make it socialism. Also grow up, using "libtard" just makes you sound like some teenager without actual points. American conservatives are liberals just with classic and judeo-christian beliefs. So they ironically insult themselves.
15 likes@Nyx dear it is very possible to buy illegal guns on whatever black market situation is going on over there. That happens in every country. I sleep next to my gun because my city is dangerous. Very dangerous.
1 like@Raven Beaudoin every country has its dangerous people, in my country we have reapers, killers , abusers etc but in my 20 years i have barelly barelly heard of shooting . It is far more dangerous to live in a bad place knowing they have acces to a gun as you are , are you 100% sure that you will have the gun on you when someone will try to kill you ? Because they will 100% sure have it on them. The point i am trying to make is ... if you try to ballance how many times people actually defended themselves with the guns and how many times inocent people was been murdered with them , the murder rate is so much higher. You loose more people with guns then without. And yes i might be black markets that i dont know about selling them, but if they are illegal and therefore more rare is a higher chance for the police to find them and a smaller chance for the bad people to find and buy them. Again, i have criminals in my country but none of them actually searched for guns from a dealer , if you cand get one that easy chances are that you will find another way. And i have no pro killer skills but i am pretty sure that a man with a knife is less dangerous than a man with a gun.
4 likes@Nyx you are correct, for me though I have to have this gun because like you said I'm 100% sure when they break into my home they will also have one. Ironically I'm much more afraid of being stabbed than shot lol. Glad you are in a safe place, I hope you never have to defend yourself. Happy holidays❤
5 likes@Lukas Reiche yeah, that kinda was my point...its the only place you can shoot that will make them stop running and not kill them...you have huge vains in your butt actually. If not in the leg where the police should shoot? In the arms ? That are a harder target and might not actually stop them? In the head or stomach or chest? To kill them instantly or slowly?
1 like@Tormentor Very well said.
1 like@Nyx I doubt violent crime doesn't occur in your country.
0 likes@Nyx
0 likes> "Criminals kill more people with those guns than the number of people that save their lives with them."
Statistically speaking; You're wrong.
@Danielle Dalton thanks!
1 like@Rhea B if overall it was harder to get guns then it would be harder for everyone to get guns. criminals are not a supply of evil minions entering our world through a portal, they are people. we need to be a lot stricter with existing gun laws and build our police force and it's affectiveness and abilities to be more helpful when needed, in my opinion.
3 likes@Axodus wtf think , what are the odds that you will have the gun on you when someone attacks you, and you will also be fast enough and have the precision in that moment to shoot them before they get the chance to shoot or catch you. where are we ? In some sf movies where you magically sesne the danger ,take the gun out of your poket, already loaded and ready to shoot, do a 180° and headshot him . Then you wake up , because this happens only in dreams.
2 likes"The latest data show that people use guns for self-defense only rarely. According to a Harvard University analysis of figures from the National Crime Victimization Survey, people defended themselves with a gun in nearly 0.9 percent of crimes from 2007 to 2011."
"The average person ... has basically no chance in their lifetime ever to use a gun in self-defense," he tells Here & Now's Robin Young. "But ... every day, they have a chance to use the gun inappropriately. They have a chance, they get angry. They get scared."
"The use of guns in self-defense by private citizens is extremely rare. VPC research has found a gun is far more likely to be used in a homicide or suicide than in a justifiable homicide. More guns are stolen each year than are used in self-defense."
"In 2017, the FBI reports there were only 298 justifiable homicides involving a private citizen using a firearm. That same year, there were 10,380 criminal gun homicides. Guns were used in 35 criminal homicides for every justifiable homicide."
Here you go buddy, these are articles wrote by people in your country not mine, ask them if they are right or wrong. Idk how the fuck can you say i am wrong when is just real life logic , i dont even need these articles, is just common sense.
The thing that you all dont seem to understand is that is not about YOU is about ALL OF YOU . Don't think just about you having a gun and being safe and probably never even use them. Think about that because you want to have a gun freely another 35 criminals have a gun and 35 people are shot, YOU might be one of those people . Sometimes we have to think ourselves as numbers. Its the same case for corona. What, if you know you have a body strong enough to get over corona, because it happens, i had corona and i was in pain 2 days then i didn't gave a fuck, does that mean you have the right to dont use a mask and go around with no care? No, because when you live in a society is not about you anymore, is about all of you and the number of people you might hurt for spreading corona , no one cares that you dont feel good staying home and wearing a mask, only you care, the society cares about how many people might be hurt if you dont do that.
@Fio Mori idk i think america is broken and couldn't help it so they just gave guns to people to save themselves because the system has failed . That's like giving a depressed person drugs and not actually helping with their problems in life. They might help at the moment but in the long run it does more bad than good. Also it is a bit too late to change anything now, It's not like they could get all those guns back .
3 likes@Axodus i mean you just have to act like in a hive if you want to live in a society , they dont care about you as an individual . For example, lets say your parents are abusing you, and after years of abuse you kill them to end your pain. You think the system would care that your daddy was spanking your ass and that gave you trauma? No, you end up in prison for murder, no one cares about you as an individual and about your feelings, they care about how many lives were lost because of you. I am going to say this again , and i am going to stop arguing because this leads nowere. The country needs to take better care of their people and not give guns to take care of themselves. My country is pretty poor but we don't cut eachothers throats to survive. We are one of the safest countries in europe , even tho usually poverty makes violence rise . We do have entire towns full of "dangerous people" but , again, we don't dare to kill people like they are nothing. We kinda have moral values and don't think only about ourselves , we raise our kids , actually RAISE them and not only gave them food and a bed and call it parenting so they dont grow up being criminals. We have been through communism so more than ever we were all we had, so we took care of eachother because we have never been a spoiled ass country as america. We have dark skin people too but never used them as slaves even tho they are a minority so we are in peace with them. We have good and bad people, educated or uneducated, poor and rich like any other country so how does it come that we can be peacefull and don't need guns and you need it? You don't. You need a better system, a better culture, and better people . You all love your country like a spoiled kid that loves his mother for giving him freedom untill they end up with the other bad kids, and america as a good mother tells him "you can beat other kids if you want " to protect him. Wouldn't have been better TO TAKE CARE OF HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE ?
2 likes@Nyx Who said I fear for my life?
1 likeIts crazy how someone can think they're so right despite being so wrong. ^_^
Whatever, stay blissfully unaware, if you dont care about your human rights you have nothing to worry about, just let them take more and more until you have nothing left.
You either have them or you don't, once you give up one of your rights it's already over.
@Rhea B Okay settle down. What is with you people? Nobody said anything about taking your guns. Is that some sort of verbal tick?
4 likes@Ra He had every reason to believe that he could get away with murdering a black man in cold blood. Thats all it is
2 likes@Raven Beaudoin I have two friends who got stabbed. They said it felt like nothing at all; didn't even realize it till they saw the blood. It's the recovery process that hurts I'd imagine.
0 likes@Natty by Nature wow that's fascinating. Where were they stabbed? I'm glad they're both okay, what an experience D:
0 likes@Raven Beaudoin Thanks, they're both doing OK, well recovered in all aspects ☺️ So, one was an incident at a party, which could have been deescalated (something to do with a woman they were both pursuing lol). The other was, unfortunately, a senseless and unmerited gang attack while my friend was studying in the UK. The knife crime there is just ridiculous.
2 likes@Lukas Reicheall im saying is that the argument "just teach them to shoot people in the legs" is not a good argument. You shouldnt be shot anywhere but unfortunately weapons and violence will always exist.
1 like@Natty by Nature as soon as you said UK I was like poor guy was probably just waiting for the bus </3 so glad they're okay!! stay safe out there people are crazy and will do the unthinkable to good people like you ❤🙏
1 likeHe was in his head like “this is my time to shine, they’re gonna give you an honorary badge and let you go, places everybody!”
4 likes@Nyx what country do you live in?
0 likes@Aleksi Suuronen left over from rich whites making poor whites in charge of slaves?
1 like@Aleksi Suuronen the psychology about why he felt like he was reporting to his supervisors when he was talking to the police. No need to get your panties in a bunch & cuss at me! Lol
2 likes@Lukas Reiche Canada has more guns per person but hardly ever have problems like the US.
0 likesMitch G He was lucky to be alive to talk to the cops and not brain hanging out from the back of the head if he was black
0 likes@A D This can certainly be a convincing argument for the 2nd amendment, however for me (an American citizen myself), but honestly based on my anecdotal experience, not to mention many studies and polls, I'm more afraid of the government that people who tend to care passionately about the 2nd amendment would want to implement by force, and see them as more likely to overthrow a legitimate democracy to enforce actual tyranny, than they are to resist any legitimate authoritarian takeover in the US (see: support for Trump, first president in US history to attempt a coup, whose supporters stormed the seat of our Federal Government).
0 likesBesides that, it all depends on who the US army sides with, and while a prolonged, armed insurgency within the US would be little match for the US Armed Forces, it would be apocalyptic for America as a whole, and make the US Civil War in the 19th Century look like nothing.
@The Morening I recently watched an episode of Band of Brothers & a soldier died after he accidentally shot himself in the leg
0 likesI love how one guy was like, in my country this ain't a problem and half of the people replying didn't even bother reading or comprehending his posts enough to realize he's not talking about america and all the bullshit they are saying is actually fuelling his points XD. Americans are so indoctrinated most of us can't even think for a second there might be other ways of life out there.
4 likes@Pneubeteube when some one says "in my country this ain't a problem" He is either lying or living in cuckoo land needing straight jacket.
1 like@Victoria Bishop Victoria, we live in a country where there are drive-by's. Other countries don't have those. We live in a country where parents, teachers, students, hell even cleaning staff have to worry about mass shooters. Other countries don't worry about those kinds of things, and when it eventually does happens they often react quickly with laws that prevent it from ever happening again or already have laws that stopped it in the first place.
3 likesHaving to sleep with a gun to feel safe actually /isn't/ normal for a lot of the first world. You are basically saying there that the US is the safest country in the world, and it frankly isn't.
Aside from what I'm assuming is ignorance of those real dangers that ARE apart of the American Zeitgeist and our day to day lives, who has taught you this way of thinking? The thinking that those who oppose this view point must be lying or crazy?
That is honestly a very unsafe way of thinking, because it disables your ability to ever think critically about your own viewpoints and causes the instant labeling of those people who think differently as enemies. Purely from the thoughts in their heads and the words on your screen. And often, it makes them enemies, because no one wants to be called crazy or attacked just because they share their experience.
I have a different view point from you Victoria, but I am not your enemy and you shouldn't attack my character just because you disagree with me. Even if you are right 99% of the time we all are human and should accept that we are fallible, and so are our opinions. Even Trump, even Biden, even our founding fathers we're slave owners Vicky.
America actually has a HUGE history of being wrong, and the sooner we try to be a better people the sooner we can pull the rest of the planet up with us.
@Pneubeteube If the President sides with gun lobby no wonder your sentiment of We live in a country where parents, teachers, students, hell even cleaning staff have to worry about mass shooters is correct and heart breaking. US is the NOT the safest country in the world, and agree she frankly isn't. Trump, even Biden, even our founding fathers we're slave owners Vicky. That's what i am shouting about. and that needs to change. America is not just Hollywood, there is downtown Disney and it is frightening place
0 likes@Victoria Bishop you didn't answer the actual question Victoria.
0 likesIf you think the US is unsafe then why did you say that anyone who says their country is safer without guns is crazy or a liar? Why did you have that reaction in the first place?
That, dear Vicky, is something I think you should explore.
@Pneubeteube I think we are getting to the stage, anything I say you question. FYI I agreed with you so now I stop replying to to your reply to my post. Let us talk about something else. Have a nice day It is sunshine out there and I am a very good mood because of the sunshine
1 like@Victoria Bishop I understand if this is overwhelming for you, and as such perhaps you shouldn't share your opinions publicly online if you don't want them scrutinized.
0 likesI've only questioned one thing you said, which you still have not answered. If anything, your dodging of the fact that you just unjustifiably called someone crazy and/or a liar makes the fact you did it even more concerning. Especially considering you seem to agree with my thinking, so where did that come from?
I will not stop replying to you on this Victoria, because by your age I'm sure you've learned there are consequences for your actions, both direct and indirect. I keep persisting because I'm just so tired of a lack of common decency in political discourse that I honestly fume about it, and frankly Vicky I'm being very patient with you, and consistently have been asking you the same thing because I'm trying to help you see how what you just did was uncalled for and completely ignorant of any experience that is un-american. We can pretend the person on the other side of the keyboard doesn't exist and judge them how we see fit, but the longer we do that the more we erode our ability to communicate.
So, again, Why would you think that man was a liar, even tho you agree that the US is not a safe place and has been wrong in the past?
@Pneubeteube Yes grandmother. I do not need your help teacher. Save it for some gullible soul. Scrutinizing and insulting are two different things. Look at your post- patronizing so and so. so take your custom to somebody. Are you his keeper? then you are not doing good job so go away and find someone to insult. I am done with you.
0 likes@Victoria Bishop I haven't insulted you once, just called you out for poor behavior. If you want to act like a child and ignore what you have done and try to attack someone actually being really kind to you on an internet full of hateful assholes then there is little hope for you.
0 likesI normally eviscerate those hateful people online Vicky, attack their ideas, not nicely explain to them why they might need to take a look inward for a second. Caring about someone isn't patronizing and the fact you are looking at it this way says my time has in fact been wasted on you.
You do not even know how mean I could have been, lady. How mean most people really would have been. My nice treatment of you is actually an outlier in online discourse. You are lucky. Just think for a moment how this conversation would have been if I had the same energy you had when you attacked that first guy. If I just attacked you instead of questioned your thinking.
@Pneubeteube you don't know me never met me and calling my poor behavior. How dare you. It is none of your business but I did not attack the first guy. Are you his keeper. This is exactly trolls behave. calling me a child is another of your grown up behaviour. I do not agree with you and that's my prerogative. Don't question my thinking first look after your thinking. English labuage is very rich you can chose the words not to offend and still put forward your side. not everyone would agree with you but that's exactly you don't like
0 likesif you want intelectual grown up discussion and agree to disagree the come back. unless that happens you are not welcome to comment on my comment. you will still do that but then I really don't care anymore what you have to say unless you stop insulting me. find someone else to troll....
@Victoria Bishop by replying to my comment you made it my business, that's how the internet works. How dare I? Lady you called a guy a liar or crazy and you don't even know him, so take some of your own medicine!
0 likesWhere were all these other words in the English language when you called that guy crazy or a liar? Calling someone a liar/crazy is an attack. My only insult was calling you childish which I feel like you are being as I have done nothing but try to get you to see how what you did was mean and you just won't do it.
Trolls do not try to reason, they only attack. The fact you think I am a troll is incredibly nieve of just how harsh and cruel (and sometimes utterly insane) political discussion on the internet is, probably because you are only used to talking on Facebook and the like with people who agree with you.
Someone who disagrees with you and presses you on it is not a troll. Some one who only replies "ok Boomer" is a troll. Do you see the difference in the amount of positive energy I have tried to push towards you in my comments, compared to someone who would just reply with a cold "ok Boomer, sounds like it's nap time".
Infact Vicky to the average internet user the way you are acting seems far more like you are a Russian troll then I seem like a, I don't know, tries to help old ladies see the error in their thinking troll. Just think about it, if I wanted to troll you I would be insulting you far harder then calling you childish. And I wouldn't be trying to reason with you.
@Martin Øverby Yesss
0 likes@mogi chi “settlers” you mean colonizers
0 likesgood he has hes right to talk the way he wants to
0 likes@Rhea B The only reason you think that is because of the 2nd amendment. Which was written 300 years ago. It has just become mythology, part of the founding myth.
0 likes@Pneubeteube I became an American citizen as a teenager. As an adult, I have done volunteer work overseas for years. I feel much safer in America.
1 likeHahahahhahahhaha
1 like@Rhea B ironically USA have the highest crime rate related to guns lol
0 likesI noticed that he went through a lot of trouble to avoid talking about what happened in the morning before he went to the store. Something probably set him off. No excuse, it’s just something I noticed.
0 likesThis fucking guy. People like that make it hard for level minded people to carry for self defence. Totally didn’t need to draw. Let alone fire.
14 likesReplies (1)
1.He can’t fight
2 likes2.He is use to picking on Women
3. Look how Injured he is from a push to the ground 😂
Life would be so different if he’d just minded his own business.
2 likesi cannot believe the defence said he was the real victim??? like wtf how heartless can you be
2 likesI love how he says his arm is really hurting, makes his own lil cast and then proceeds throughout the interrogation flail his arms around.
1956 likesReplies (19)
LMFAO
14 likesThiiiiiiiis tho
2 likesIt's like when you hurt your sibling and pretend you're also hurt 😂
73 likesRight. Also making it look like a sling even though he isn't claiming to have a broken arm. A bruised arm hurts, but it doesn't require a sling OR a cast. It just hurts.
30 likesoh yes, can't stop thinking the same the whole video :D
1 likeI mean I've had injuries like this and the pain comes on gradual and the pain can only be there with certain movements. I'm sure he's playing it up a bit but immobilizing your wrist/arm at the onset of pain is just kind of standard protocol but the pain might not be terrible yet to the point that you could flail your arm and not remember that it's been injured
5 likes@Saber.jpg. dude the guy is like 50, not in great shape and was blindsided by that douchebag who pushed him...it's pretty easy to sprain your wrist that way and the timeframe from when the incident happens to when he's being interviewed is in line with when the pain starts showing up in my personal experiences. Like I said I don't doubt he might be playing it up but to just straight up be like "he's lying" is the only unreasonable thing here.
10 likes@MoonMan Ah, hes hitting you with A D V A N C E D S A R C A S M
4 likes@butts yeah, because nothing about that situation is at all threatening.
12 likesLike, yeah, he did the wrong thing, but the guy just spent two minutes screaming and yelling because a car wasn't parmed where he thought it should be, its pretty reasonable to take hin for a threat.
i was surprised he actually shook the correct hand with the cops though. i would have forgotten that
0 likes@butts In the video it was stated that people in and around the store heard screaming coming from both a man and a woman. I think this is sufficient evidence that he was yelling at the woman.
7 likes@butts Why do you have to reply with so much hostility and cynicism? You're so angry I can feel it in my own liver just reading it.
4 likesRegarding the case, anyone with a small degree of civility can see that it was an over reaction and ridiculous to shove the man so hard to the ground and it's even more so to shoot him for it. How can there even be an argument about this?
@Poultry I'm from the city just how we talk here, swearing here doesn't mean you're hostile. Either way yeah you're right both overreacted. The juice drinkers want to pretend the original shoving scumbag was just "protecting his family" though lmao
0 likes@lucian 3 weeks before someone brought skin colour into it. Well done.
0 likes@Ubloo Oh really? Could you tell me the timestamp that shows him initiating the physical contact?
0 likes@butts Imagine being with your kids and a strange man is in such a hurry he parks in a non existent spot in order to walk around and around your car without any context and then starts verbally harassing you (as proved in video he escalates the situation by re approaching the car once he realizes someone was sitting in it and witnesses stated there was yelling as that was the whole reason the victim came out of the store in a hurry) approaching strangers and acting like you have authority over them and their actions when you have none all sounds pretty aggressive to me.
3 likes@Ubloo I asked about physical contact, not aggressive "harassing". If I was some bottom feeder that parks in handicapped spots because I felt entitled to it, I would think I would at least understand why people would call me out about it and I certainly would aggressively argue with them and escalate it even further when I'm in the wrong. I also wouldnt violently attack the person calling me out, even if they were yelling. Then again, I'm a civilized person living in a civilized area, you seem to identify more with the bottomfeeders.
0 likes@butts Shoving someone is violently attacking but shooting someone while they are retreating is an act of a civilized man? If someone parking illegally pisses you off more than killing someone who is retreating then you need therapy, but I have a feeling you dont really think that and like I said your true colors are showing. I'd rather be a bottom feeder than such a 🐱 coward that I bring out a gun in a shoving match in a situation i started
3 likes@Ubloo ITT: bottomfeeders defending bottomfeeders.
0 likesIf Drejka were telling the truth about the victim charging him after the first push rather than stepping back there may be room for debate here but the video doesn't lie. Justice was done. I with the victim's family well.
2 likesOut of all of these I’ve watched, he probably screwed himself the most by not requesting a lawyer when he first got interrogated
1 likeJIM YOUR ALMOST AT FIVE MILLION SUBS CONGRATULATIONS 🍾 !!!! You deserve it buddy!! + I am so happy I’ve been along for the ride! You are an absolute genius & I love your content !!!
3 likesWow. Why is another humans life regarded as so cheap? To pull a gun seems a drastic measure to take, but to then go one step further and shot another person is just appalling. If the gut was running at him with a knife then maybe, but he was backing off. Surely after the gun is pulled you would hope the person you are pointing it at retreats, which is what happened here. Why that man thought to pull the trigger is beyond me.
1 likeThis should be a lesson to all of us. The next time we think about shouting at somebody, or arguing, or belittling them, maybe stop and think. People have families, other people who love them. Some people are just having a bad day or a rough time of it. Try support, understanding and forgiveness first. It doesn't show weakness to be nice and it doesn't show strength to be cruel.
Seeing altercations like this is why I don’t get into confrontations with other people I don’t know. You never know what people are gonna do these days.
1289 likesReplies (45)
💯
12 likesFacts, I never trust any person in general. I gotta gain their respect by getting to know them first and vice versa before seeing someone regularly.
16 likesThat guy should have minded his own business.
25 likesConfronting somebody in Clearwater is a bad idea, I had some dude pull a gun on me for cutting him off a few years ago lmao
4 likes@Sophia P Really? Hmm. I think sometimes it is hard to be right and not tell another person that what they are doing is wrong no matter what race they are. Lol,
20 likesAustralia doesn’t have these problems with guns I don’t know why American doesn’t change there rules. In Australia we still own guns just can’t buy them at Walmart it’s honestly a joke
11 likes@Coast Life i agree man
0 likes@Coast Life once guns are outlawed in the US they will eventually be off the streets via the police. Then the black market price for guns will skyrocket and most criminals won’t be able to afford them. See Australia and most other developed nations that banned guns. Gun violence fell drastically not increased.
4 likesAnd that's why it's important not to allow pretty much anybody to carry a gun
1 like@Coast Life The reputation of living in the US has prevented me from gaining a work Visa in Europe.
1 like@Stringfellow Hawk don't let stuff like this influence your decision to come to the US. The vast majority of gun deaths in the US are suicides and gang crime. People do not go around acting like this guy. I mean, just look at all the comments from Americans about him.
3 likes@Michael Zomsuv I absolutely have to disagree, this was not self defense. Shooting someone over being pushed. His life was not at threat. The man just wanted to shoot. I mean when he drew his gun the black man started to walk back the altercation should have ended no need to actually shoot and kill.
14 likesAnd this is why guns are a mistake
2 likesSame here it's not the victim's fault. But I would have never pushed anyone over words.
1 like@Jason Enna
0 likesNice one 😂
@Trajan Barrera
0 likesTotally agree
@bwillsskates
9 likesYeah, sure you would.
An then everyone would have clapped and offered to pay your groceries. 🙄
I try not to even honk my horn anymore
0 likes@black_Ninja Just don’t argue with people. You have zero substance besides straw men arguments.
1 likeEasier if you're not in a country where any idiot can buy a gun.
0 likes@Plorin
2 likesAt what point exactly was i arguing?
I was simply pointing out how stupid all of those guys ‚argumants‘ sound, it wasn‘t meant to have any substance. 😊
I‘m not here to convert people, i‘m here to have my fun an cringe at peoples stupid excuses for a murderer.
If you‘re searching for intellectual discussions, then you might wanna leave Youtube comments and look for a discussion group in your area or something like that. 😂
@Sophia P N
0 likes@naegi makato Is it reasonable to attack someone in the first place? You're omitting the initial use of force. Using your metaphor it wasn't a swing (which is already a violent act with intent of dealing damage) but a delivered blow, a major one too. What's reasonable force when you're on the ground and an aggressive attacker is towering over you? Do you know how little time it takes to close the gap and continue the physical attack, maybe taking one's gun and using it against the victim? Do you think you'd be completely cool and rational in his place?
0 likes@bwillsskates and you'd get arrested and charged with battery.
0 likes@Wabi Sabi The fact that there IS a "vast majority of gun deaths" should be a huge red flag for anyone imo
0 likesHe shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
0 likes@hotdyme86 obviously shooting someone because they pushed you isn’t on the same level but pushing someone hard from their blind spot onto payment because of words is just as bad
1 likeI don't get in altercation either, because you never know.
0 likes@Coast Life How about you move to North Korea then. USA is a great country and just cause we have a gun problem doesn't make the USA a fucked place to live in we have the most rights out of every country yes every country you don't have the freedom of speech in Britian and Canada the governemnt has the right to stop newspapers from saying certain things in those countries. We also have baseball and football..
0 likes@Maxime B you obviously don't live in the US if you think it sucks because people have guns.
0 likes@Coast Life it’s a simple generalisation, don’t act like you’ve been a minority for centuries.
0 likes@Sophia P race has nothing to do with this.
1 like@Trajan Barrera Gun violence decreases, though in some cases it increases overall violence and even stabbings. Look at the U.K.
0 likesI don't think living in fear is the way to go. To each his own, but if I see someone parked in a handicapped spot and it's clear the person is not handicapped, I will tell them they are in a handicapped spot. Now I don't live in the USA, so I'm not afraid of someone pulling a weapon. Maybe that's a huge difference, I don't know.
1 like@FlymanMS He did NOT have to fire that shot over a petty fight and any reasonable man could've found other routes to take. Maybe use the gun as leverage if the thought of him taking it occurs to you?
0 likesThat’s a good thing
0 likes@Coast Life lmfao u can’t be racist towards white peoples?
0 likesUh oh he hit me.
0 likesGo tell your teacher don't grab a fricking gun!
Or talk it out like real men.
REAL MEN (and women) don't need guns. They have common sense
@Sophia P 😂😂😂
0 likesHe should’ve never approached the car to begin with. He went to the store to buy whatever it is he was supposed to buy. He should’ve minded his business and went about his day. He was trying to play police when he should’ve went about his normal day. There wasn’t a handicap person in distress for the spot. He wasn’t handicap so that spot is of no importance to him. While I agree it’s ignorant parking in handicap, it’s also none of my business.
1 like@Sincerely Shell All 3 adults involved in this altercation were god damn fools, lol.
1 like@Stone Devil there's always going to be a vast majority for any kind of statistic. that same statistic is also true in the UK. In the UK, in 2016, 107 deaths were caused by firearms. 85 of those were suicides. The vast majority of gun deaths in the UK are suicides. Ironically enough, despite some of the strictest gun laws in the world, guns still account for 8% of all homicides in the UK. Apparently criminals with the intent to murder aren't concerned with obeying gun laws.
0 likes@Axel I agree. I still think the main point is that unless there is something threatening happing in your surroundings, life is much smoother if you mind your business lol I grew up in a terrible area and I’ve survive it by just simply minding the business that pays me lol now I live in a completely different state and it’s more suburbs. While I know most of the people in my neighborhood by simply just living there... Guess what ? I still mind my business lol I own firearms but I would hope that I’m never put in a position where I have to use it. In this case, I think he definitely couldn’t wait.
0 likesHave not used my car horn in years because of this logic
0 likes@Wabi Sabi You know what? I didn't know that. Thanks. But truth be told, although I personally believe what I said meaning if i go somewhere where there is an official gun death statistic and guns were literally everywhere I would be scared out of my mind, it was made more as a snarky comment rather than a serious point or argument
0 likesHe protected his mother's children immediately
5 likesI blame the system allowing Tom, Dick and Harry allowed to carry a fire arm.
2 likesIf he didn't have the gun he would have ended up with some broken bones and a life would be saved and 20 years of his.
A man is not a camera, it would be interesting to know how much his brutal fall to the ground could have affected his perception of the "threat".
1 likeThis channel really teaches you to never fucking talk without a god damn lawyer but also to just not commit violent crimes…
1 likeIf anyone's after an update, he's been sentenced to 20 years.
16756 likesBtw, he got 20 years. And it was upheld in 2021 in appeals court.
2 likesMy favorite part was when Michael asked the sheriff if his gun would have been out...we all know the answer to that question.
0 likesNot to make light of the situation. Tragic
tell me just how was he first released without charge when the guy he shot was already dead? wtf is that? in my country he would be in jail no matter why he shot the other guy, and the trial would be 2 years later
2 likesHe was possessed by the killing power of that gun! Carrying a gun comes with the responsibility of handling it judiciously!
1 likeDude really thought the cops were his friends....in his head he really thought he would get away with this.
1419 likesReplies (28)
HE IS INNOCENT.
15 likes@Darren Chen lmaoooooo
29 likes@Darren Chen lmao
12 likesI disagree. He was trying to convince them, but he was also lying to them. He was hoping they would believe his lies.
14 likes@Narnia is great Nice, you're the only one who fell for the bait and got mad. Good job
3 likesQwhite interesting
4 likesA lot of gun nuts are very pro-cops. They think cops are on their side.
13 likesHe did the right thing though so he should’ve gotten away
3 likes@Zheka Zheka Maybe that explains the high number of shootings in America. Great job!
6 likeswhy didn't he just remain silent????? He could have avoided jail time!!!!
2 likes@Zheka Zheka he got PUSHED and retaliated with taking the life of another human. if you think that’s the right thing, you really need to reevaluate
14 likesProves how genuine he was in his explanation that he was just trying to neutralize the threat. Only used one bullet, waited for police, fully cooperated with police without an attorney (big mistake) and rid the world of one more drug addict criminal. WIN!!
0 likes@Sabrason at that range you should be able to hit a leg easily no he went for a kill
7 likes@Drunken Sheep Oh I wasn't trolling, I meant it.
0 likesLiterally if he shut his mouth and didn’t talk to the cops with an attorney present he would have beat it
0 likesGiven the fact that cops get away with murdering unarmed black men all the time, do you really blame him for thinking that?
1 likeHe did get away with it. The cops let him go free after this interrogation and stated in a public press conference that he wouldn't be charged. It's only because the district attorney independently charged him that he went to jail at all.
4 likesHe didn't just think the cops were on his side, they actually were on his side.
@Rockstar So, wdym ?
0 likesI didn't fall for his troll. Simply told him that no one falls for that kind trolls. I don't see any problems with that.
@Rockstar bothered me ? I just found him funny tho xD
1 likeStop assuming shit. I am muting your notifications.
@Darren Chen LOL
0 likes@Farco I think he had a legit claim to fear of greivous bodily harm. If he hadn't have pulled his gun I think he would have gotten his head stomped. He hesitated a little too long.
0 likes@Rose he shouldn't have attacked the guy over literally nothing lmfao
0 likes@Caitlin MacLeod Dude really thought the cops were his friends....in his head he really thought he would get away with this.
0 likes@ֹ Cops are rarely your friends unless you're one of them.
0 likes@Rose Exactly
0 likes@Caitlin MacLeod Dude really thought the cops were his friends....in his head he really thought he would get away with this.
0 likesDon't feed the troll everyone...he'll be late to his Trump rally
0 likes@Zheka Zheka If it was the right thing, then why is he in jail?
0 likesThe craziest part is this guy legitimately thinks he had no choice. The guy was 15 feet away from him with no weapon and he had no choice but to kill him because he got a shoulder boo boo. ROTC drop out at its finest
1 like33:57 of course at the moment that he opened his mouth without consulting an attorney he lost his case... But this dude said he was going to finish what he started... Man you started that whole altercation by confronting those people about a placard that you don't issue
6 likesThose kids lost their father cuz some wannabe cop was trying to find any reason to pull his gun
8 likesUnfortunately if I am the jury I find difficult to say it is a 'stand your ground' case. The victim didn't pose any threat, actually retreating, when his gun was pulled. There was no point pulling the trigger at that moment. Guilty of manslaughter is fair.
6 likesReplies (1)
Not only that but he was pushed in the first place because he was standing there taking pictures of a woman’s car and yelling at her! Obviously the one who was shot felt that piece of shit was threatening. That asshole can’t say he felt threatened when he was obviously the threatening one to everyone that was inside freaking out about him yelling at the woman!
1 like"The gentleman you shot is deceased"
3393 likes"Thank you for telling me"
Enjoy your 20 years buddy.
Replies (63)
Why would he care about some random guy who pushed him to the ground? Do you expect him to burst into tears? 😆
108 likesOnly 20!?
45 likes@Nathaniel Ward a random guy who he killed. Very different than some random guy you never met. Being responsible for the immoral death of someone else is a terrible thing
395 likes@Nathaniel Ward bro you’re soooo edgy! We’re all sooo impressed by your edginess! Mr Edgelord!!
157 likes@Brian Badonde if you would imorally kill someone in the first place willingly then I doubt you would care
9 likes@Ivy Brooks ? I'm not trying to be edgy, I'm saying he killed the guy for pushing him down so why would he care 😆 dnt get so emotional
20 likes@Nathaniel Ward you could show remorse, you know, like a normal human being..
67 likes@Nathaniel Ward broooo youre sooo right! I’m so emotional and you’ve never had an emotion in your life!! That makes you even more edgy bro 😩🙏 I’m sure you’re super popular with the ladies 😭
84 likes@Nathaniel Ward I wouldn't kill them though, and if I did,, I would feel the gravity of taking another humans life.. that's the difference between psychopaths and normal people
48 likes@Nathaniel Ward if your immediate response is to shoot someone who's clearly unarmed at the moment- then you lost your shit
40 likesTo be fair I could certainly see something like that being said out of shock but the way he says it is kind of odd
3 likes@Nathaniel Ward or you've simply never learned to write correctly
15 likes@Nathaniel Ward Dreyjka is that you?
17 likes@Ivy Brooks I don't think you know what edgy means. Their comment was very valid. Why would this man who doesn't know this guy (who had attacked him first) care whatsoever about the death of someone he had shot? Of course, he shouldn't have shot, and his response was weird, but what makes you think someone is edgy because the other user understands this crazy man doesn't care about the victim.
3 likes@Hallie Lola you called someone insane on the internet without knowing them, because YOU misunderstood their comment. That's quite embarrassing.
3 likes@Keep crying well seeing as though edgy is subjective, perhaps you don’t know what it means? The word valid is also subjective, do you know what valid means?
4 likesThe dude didn’t attack him to the point of needing to use self defense, hence why he’s in prison. To shoot someone in cold blood and not care that you killed them is psychopath behavior, and if you think that’s normal, maybe you have some psychopathic tendencies as well?
Thanks..I was looking to see how much time he got. Being that this was OBVIOUSLY NOT a justifiable homicide!!
1 like@P so pushing someone equals death to you, okay gotcha...found another psycho. Has nothing to do with perspective or MY opinion, it is a fact. Also we are not talking about someone random dying, we're talking about you killkng someone.
5 likes@Keep crying bro you just typed out 3 paragraphs to 3 different people 😂 who’s crying again? 😂
3 likesWhat about the real victims of this tho
0 likes@Nathaniel Ward you are not normal lol
2 likesAnother hero unjustly condemned by the literate masses
0 likes20 years seems a bit long considering he was still acting in self-defense for the most part. The fool shoved him to the ground.
1 like@Nathaniel Ward because you kill someone
1 like@Nathaniel Ward death is forever, being pushed on the ground is temporary.
2 likes@Nathaniel Ward schafer
0 likesI really doubt he'll finish his sentence, without having a freak accident in prison.
0 likesIn a case like this I think it should be life there was no excuse for that. He basically destroyed a family.
1 like@Nathaniel Ward you’re legal name is Nathaniel ward LMFAOOOO
1 likeWalking L
@Nathaniel Ward You’re not very good at getting the point across but I know what you’re trying to say
3 likesFor all of the goons sitting here acting like Nathaniel is gonna be in the next video, pay attention to what he’s actually saying. Why would Michael Drejka, a racist who happily shot a retreating man for pushing him, care about that man? Nathaniel isn’t saying that it’s the right way to respond but that’s literally just how Michael would, and it shouldn’t surprise anyone given his interrogation and actions up to that point.
It’s not right for him to think that way but unfortunately that’s just how it is
@Ivy Brooks nice one. Did you get that from r/rareinsults?
0 likes@Ivy Brooks Harry Ranyard and Nathaniel Ward are the same people. Just look at the punctuations and use of emojis. Same person bro. You busted his eggplant.
0 likesI think you have the context wrong, he says that nobody else would tell him how the guy is doing like he's asked and they've told him after nobody else would
0 likes@Farmer Fpv lmao wait you’re right. That’s awesome 😂
0 likeswhy just 20 years? why not life in prison?
0 likesimagine saying thank you for telling me lmao
0 likesThe entire argument I just read was completely idiotic.
1 like@Nathaniel Ward Let me guess, you are 15 and feel like you are cool because you can watch gore videos without flinching? Wow, such a big tough man.
1 likeChiled0g Ikr it's so full of misunderstandings but for some reason I'm quite hung up on it
0 likes@Nathaniel Ward you’re right. the moral, human reaction of someone after unintentionally killing another person is panic, uncertainty, remorse, sadness, etc. but since this man killed this other man out of cold blood it’s just right for him to react this way.
1 likeWow this comment thread is idiotic and you internet geniuses that believe you're the knights in shining white armour, allow me to translate what that Nathaniel Ward guy was saying:
1 likeIf the suspect was cowardly and cold blooded enough to shoot the victim after said victim shoved him because of an argument the suspect started himself, then he would act just as cowardly and cold blooded after learning he needlessly ended the victim's life, rather than being empathetic and remorseful like any normal person would.
Don't forget that the suspect is sticking to his version of events that makes the killing justifiable, so to learn that he justifiably took someone's life wouldn't bare much weight on his conscience. Even though in reality there was obviously nothing justifiable about it whatsoever. He was the instigator and the aggressor who is also trying to play the victim.
The lack of brain cells on the internet never ceases to amaze me. Mob mentality even when you're all wrong.
@GamingDober He's gonna rot there buddy
0 likes@Nathaniel Ward It’s only basic empathy. You should care what happens to anyone to a certain extent. Even if he made a deeply reprehensible decision at the moment, he could still have the humanity to regret it. It obviously doesn't begin to rationalize/justify what they did, but the point is how you can almost never have a precise understanding of another human's mind. While there's a common way which every mind works, it's in such a way where what's actually behind people's thoughts and decisions can range from interesting, to confusing, to outright delusional, and in analyzing those kinds of attitudes you can only really hope for a few of countless reasonable possibilities, some likelier than others. Sounds super pretentious, but that's just the way I see it and how it seems to work.
0 likesMore like "Kill confirmed." fucked up lol
0 likes@Ivy Brooks are you on the spectrum?
0 likes@Elia Elirko agreed. But there's some states that you have to be so careful with saying something like "I'm sorry".
0 likesOnce you say that.. they can shift the narrative around your apology.
So then you have to be more careful with words like saying "I am sorry to hear that."
But then they people can spin it in different ways.
Watching this video kinda shows how poor the law is. The narrator even says "a lawyer would have emphasized the safety of himself without a shred of doubt"
And considering how many people like him get a lawyer and say "I was scared he would kill me" and self defense is fine.
The fact we can watch this and say 2.5 seconds is a long time, if you've ever been in a situation where there's high adrenaline.. 2.5 seconds feels like forever and an instant. So.. realistically this guy would've probably gotten away with it if be had a lawyer.
Then at which case, we wouldn't see any of this and then we would claim unjust laws etc.
Watching this video really highlights the importance of lawyers words in determining someone's freedom or not. Which in my opinion is silly.
This turns the justice system into a joke almost. As this guy would've been free if he had a lawyer.
@Nathaniel Ward “if you would immorally kill someone you probably wouldn’t care. “ yes sir. That’s the point we are making. Most people don’t kill people. Most people would react with sadness and regret for having their actions lead to the death of another human being.
0 likes@Please Fire Greg Roman so just because it’s the internet, you’re going to just harass and bully a guy? That’s disgusting. He made a very serious point. Why is everyone in this thread thinking that this murderer is sane enough to care about killing someone? He’s disgusting, so he didn’t even think about his actions. That’s what Nathaniel was saying, and you think it’s okay to attack him? 😬
1 like@Bárbara Froto you clearly can’t read Barbara? Why are you lying about what I said? Your comment is irrelevant. Next time, make a valid comment, and don’t lie and say I was defending him? THATS weird😂
1 like@Farmer Fpv wtf are you on about? Are you insane? We were both making similar points. Could I argue that everyone else in the thread is the same person, because they all missed the point? The point they were getting across was that this racist murderer OBVIOUSLY wouldn’t care if he killed someone, because he is proud of it: do you understand now? I’m sorry your comprehension skills are awful, but it doesn’t mean anyone was defending his actions
0 likes@Oliver Reyes Oliver, can you not read whatsoever? They aren’t acting tough. All they were doing was pointing out that this racist murderer is so weird that he obviously wouldn’t care that he killed someone. You just misread it, and instead decided to attack this guy? Learn to read before typing out bs first😂
1 like@Overly Aggressive Machine are you okay? That’s exactly the point Nathaniel is making. That the man is psychotic, so he didn’t care, and why would he? He is a racist murderer who thought he did good, so of course he doesn’t care🤨.
1 likeLmao so much crying. He will enjoy his 20 years but that muppet who sucker pushed him to the ground he won't. The lesson is clear. :D if he just asks where is the problem and doesn't attack him he could live today.
0 likes@Inspeorama he paroled already
1 like@Dropit what’s the difference between “minor confrontation” and assault? I’m not defending the guy but just curious at this point?
0 likes@Nathaniel Ward I had to re read what you said to understand lol. People think you’re support the shooter when really you’re saying “why would this pos show any emotion”
1 like@Olive cheetoman YES THANK YOU! 😆 some people are understanding me, others think I'm with the killer. I really messed up that wording but I'll just let it rock 😎
0 likes@ME LOLZ in a good way?
0 likes@Nathaniel Ward nuh uh
0 likes@Nathaniel Wardif there’s one thing I’ve learned it’s that people read what they wanna read, they don’t necessarily think.
0 likesLiterally every single person angry with you is an absolute toddler with their cognitive thinking lollll
@greg77389 Tell that to the court, he got 20 years, with the prosecution basing their case upon prior incidents where he threatened people with a handgun over road rage, that he was willing to put himself in a situation, wherein any escalation would result in him using lethal force and even camera footage that did not put him in a good light to say the least
0 likes@greg77389 Not every physical assault has you in genuine fear for your life that justifies responding with deadly force.
0 likes@Herbert West
0 likesIf someone shoves you to the ground, that is reason enough to fear for your life. The reason he was found guilty is because enough time passed when he aimed the gun at him while he was backing away. If the guy kept coming towards him, it would be a different story.
This video is fascinating, he really really feels that he is not guilty of anything.
1 likeI certainly haven’t watched all of the court proceedings but from what was shown, his lawyer came off as very disingenuous and presented his argument in a very very poor way.
0 likesIf he didn't have a gun he wouldn't dare to mess with them
6 likesJust found out about this age and im on a streak for the past two days. Think ive seen 6-7 vids now and my psyche went up and down. Im getting smarter, dumber even, i laughed, cringed, swallowed my spit heavily a few times, watched a whole episode of 1.30 hr with my glass of water in my hand which i wanted to drink but really couldnt, and so on and on. Finally im out of the bullsh1t of those billionaires and finally watching some everyday stuff
1 likeNotice how in both the Michael Drejka and Michael Dunn case, neither of them show emotion when informed the person they shot passed away, but immediately start tearing up when you mention their dog?
4128 likesReplies (89)
Came to the comments section for this
89 likesThe lesson from this channel is never live in Florida, nor get into an altercation with a middle-aged Michael, especially if you’re a person of color.
449 likesHaha drejka will never see his dogs again infact he wont be seeing any dogs for many many years!!
71 likesHe didn't know him, he didn't even see the face of that man very well. He looked sad though, but there's no reason for him to tear up, even if he wanted to.
21 likesall these people are saying yeah well he didn’t know the guy, but like presumably it would be upsetting to know you killed a person even if you don’t know them.
148 likes@Sadie K What do you expect him to do? Burst in tears?!
16 likes@Dzidkapl haha I would, but I'm not saying that. Just that not knowing the person who died isn't really the point it's knowing that you killed a human being.
104 likes@Sadie K So what is even your point? What is so wrong about his behaviour? Why are you trying to disagree with me, yet you fail to do it?
3 likes@Sadie K You don't know what's going through his head and how he shows emotions so don't pretend that you do.
7 likes@Dzidkapl settle down lol never said I did
73 likesSo point being… don’t trust someone name Michael.
12 likes@E T Michael Afton?
1 like@Dzidkapl ?
9 likes@E T ummmm uhhhhh
1 like@Dzidkapl don’t know him
2 likes@E T You should buddy, you should.
0 likes@Dzidkapl doesn’t seem interesting to me buddy. It doesn’t.
24 likesYou must not be too well schooled. That "tearing up" in a natural visceral response. Your Dad must have taught you to keep yours so suppressed you wouldn't cry if a lost child was found. Poor you.
5 likes@Dzidkapl why would that be ridiculous, since he got choked up at the mention of his dogs?
32 likesSadie K i certainly wouldnt cry over killing a person who hurt me
1 likeI’ll be honest, I’ve always connected to that. Some people, like myself, just like dogs better than people. People suck. Dogs rule.
6 likes@Sadie K hey, he’s not getting heated Sadie. Let the femme boy finish.
0 likes@FC Mania I live in Florida and I’m black.
4 likesAll the stereotypes about Florida are about 70% true. Lol
@Traktor well you aren’t very mature, nor empathetic.
4 likes@Sadie K depends of your emotional predisposotion. I, for example, feel pretty numb in regards to a lot of things.
1 like@asdfomfglol yeah, of course! There's a wide range of reactions that you could have.
1 likeWell, people generally have an emotional attachment to their pets. This dude shot a guy who attacked him. The killing was unjust, but still, you don't just immediately slam someone into the pavement in front of your kids without at least asking them what the hell they're saying to your girlfriend.
3 likes@Sadie K yeah, but that takes time to set in. This guy was still in a mental tailspin. It would likely cause him to get emotional later on once it sinks in that he killed a father. If it were me and I felt justified in my actions, why would I be compelled to weep?
0 likes@asdfomfglol that's accurate. Everyone is different.
0 likes@Lester Napoleon Green yep! I agree, you definitely don't have to cry.
1 likeThat’s the traits of a physcopath
1 likeQuite obviously, this is because dogs are better than humans. Hope this helps!
1 likeIn conclusion, avoid michaels
0 likes@James Flaherty he chillin with the "dogz" in prison
5 likesThey're so far gone mentally speaking that they've either completely absolved themselves of any guilt in their mind (and therefore do not have any sympathy for their victims) or they simply do not care at all. Yet when their dogs are brought into the equation, when their families are mentioned, it is when their personal lives are brought up that they show actual emotion. Because they're going to suffer the repercussions of their actions, and harm coming their way is a completely different story than harm going someone else's way.
1 like@Sal Monella not much. My joke is that on this channel, there are coincidentally 2 cases where a middle age Michael shoots a black man to death.
1 likeIdk what you’re trying to argue.
@FC Mania Ah OK, I got you.
0 likesif they are playing the position that they felt their lives were in danger, (the only way that would justify what they did) they wont show emotion after finding out they killed the person that they "truly felt" was going to kill them, so in a way it makes sense in both cases for them not get emotional because they are playing the "it was him or me" obviously in both cases nothing was actually justified due to all of the evidence proving that neither were really in any danger,
0 likesMichael’s really just be like that
0 likesA dog matters more
2 likes@FC Mania Nothing to do with color or where you are from. People can be evil irregardless of what "color" they are.
0 likesWell atheist=Selfishness
0 likesNoticed that shit too
0 likesbruh I care more about my dogs then other random strangers
5 likesThey both also flaunt their self delusions regarding their combat abilities. Kids in the picture, asinine reason to pull and shoot, convinced that the police support their actions from the absolute start, zero emotion when they find out the opinion of law enforcement is that they killed without justification...Eerily similar; even the initials are accounted for :D
3 likesYou already know
1 like@FC Mania you really think it's coincidence? Really? Not that they deliberately picked them to point to an archetype and a pattern?
0 likes@michael boultinghouse Bit ironic considering your name.
1 like@Dzidkapl you make a good point, tears would’ve been absurd. We give you that.
0 likesAre you prepared to concede that an “oh well.” reaction is equally absurd, cause that was effectively his response to the news.
well, yeah, why would i care about someone that was attacking me? if you attack me your life doesnt matter to me. but dont touch the doggo.
3 likes@Alpha Wolfgang your life doesn't matter to me if you call dogs "doggo"
3 likes@Jack youre just a mad person because you have no puppers
2 likesSing of a good person.
0 likesThey don't cry for other people, they cry for themselves, and the things they know they will lose, like the dog.
3 likesOkay but I know a lot of guys who are like that. We were all in the military though.
0 likesIt's not a sign of anything on the suspect's part, it's you failing to understand human psychology.
1 like@James Flaherty Maybe a german Shepherd
0 likes@Andrew Wertz It's way different if he's in court, as im sure you know basically everything that happens in court is just acting cause that's what it takes to not get charged with stuff
0 likes@Dzidkapl GEEEZ someone got offended
1 like@Sadie K yeah they're not thinking about it in the fact of him killing him, just the fact that yeah they themselves wouldn't care much of a random person dying so why should he? But that is not what is the case, if you defend yourself with use of a weapon. Your aim is to protect yourself not kill the offender, you'd feel awful if you did, he doesn't care so I guess his aim was to, with intent, kill that man
0 likes@Professor Gunk that's stupid interpretation. I mean overall it's the messed up "everyone can own a gun"
0 likeslaw, but aside of thisif you feel in danger and we know the crime rates of random shootings or stabbings , IF you have an noradrenaline shoot you don't think "hm where can I aim that he won't die but just not stab or punch me to death?" no, he had no second. he turned and shot. And why would you feel awful towards someone hurting you? IF you do THAT would be messed up. It's karma. He didn't have to push him, he wouldn't have gotten shot. But the way he backed off into the store to me even makes me think the other guy planned to kill the guy with the gun on purpose.Also the dog thing: If there is a person hurting me on purpose (he could have hit his head on ground and also died on brain bleedings btw), why would I show a) mercy, b)remorse c) grief? But there is an innocent animal being and mabye you like dogs. Of course I would cry over a dog, a cat, another random pet oO
I would too..
1 like@James Flaherty police dogs 😂😂😂
0 likes@James Flaherty they prolly have narc dogs in the state pen
1 likeIt's called the John Wick effect
0 likesAlotta thet Shiet goin around apparently, eh?
0 likes@FC Mania he assaulted a guy and got shot without talking the problem out. same thing as kyle rittenhouse.
0 likes@Sadie K unless they were a criminal. criminals do push people alot. people that assault others tend to get shot
0 likesI was about to say the same thing. Nothing matters but what exists in their lives and not to families affected by what was done.
1 likeI was just about to comment how this case reminds me so much of that one!
0 likesdogs are better than MOST people.
1 likeWhat? But this guy clearly showed emotion? He became noticeably solemn. If I thought someone had attacked me for no good reason, I wouldn't start sobbing or anything if I learned that they had died.
1 likeYou know, if i would live in US, i would just called the cops.
0 likes@Sadie K No it's not. If i found out that you're dead i would be like "meh, happens". And there's nothing wrong with me, a lot of people dying everyday and i'm aware of that.
0 likesYou're about face charges and a lot of troubles because of that person. It's completely normal to not react to that. I'll give you another example: let's say a girl has been raped and she managed to hit him with a blunt weapon and get away quickly. Then she was told by the police that he actually died. Should she feel remorse or sadness for that matter? No.
Why on earth someone who assumed that he was in his right to shot the person would feel otherwise?
I mean, people are kinda crappy, I love my dog.
0 likesI mean he learned the man that assaulted him and he fired at died. That's the desired result when you shoot someone. Not sure what you expected
1 likeThats because there are sick people out there who actually put the lives of their dogs over human life.
1 likeNot all dog people are nuts but lots of psychos are dog ppl lol
0 likesYou mean they have more compassion for their loyal companion than their assailant? I don't find that odd.
1 like@Connor dogs are only as loyal as their food source. Try it.
1 likeIf you found out some angry man who shoved you died, would you be sad?
1 likeIf you found out your dog died, would you be sad?
Lol you know why
0 likesRight!! Like if I had been notified that I had killed someone I would probably break down into tears. I never could harm another person intentionally. If I ever did kill someone it would have to be like some freak car accident, and even then I would still cry over the loss of a life.
1 likeMichaels are bad?
0 likes@Sadie K He didn't care for him to the point he shot him. Get a life. Out of all the things to flex on, getting mad at a murderer for not feeling empathy for the stranger he killed is bizarro 101
0 likes@FC Mania No, that's not the lesson! The lesson is be an adult and don't escalate the situation when
0 likesI thought that was rich.
0 likesIf you actually cared about your dog 🐕 you wouldn't be commiting crimes that can get you 25-life !
1 likeWho's going too look after his dog now !?
@Jordan Storey Yeah, That's right! Like the time when the Police caught me killing my wife. I cried. I was crying because I got caught but, I still had the decency to cry! These people have no feelings! If I was the judge they'd get five years extra for not crying, shocking behaviour!
1 likeYep he'd already won the altercation in stand off terms. Shooting a backing off assailant is pure murder. He wanted the guy to keep coming, disappointed he shot him anyway. Super lame. Disgusting. Best defense: diminished mental faculties. 21:19.
0 likesWhen you chose violence, you will get punished.. In this case it happened to both aggressors
1 likeHe describes himself as an average, everyman guy with the same issues, just like most people. He neglects to mention the main difference between himself and most people, he was carrying a gun and thought it justified his actions. Most people don't carry guns.
1 likeIt's called Steel Courage.
1 likeThe question is would he have "checked for plaques" and engaged with the young lady if he was unarmed?
This guy was too stupid to recognize that he was being investigated and was instead so excited to perform for the guys around him
3446 likesReplies (19)
Affirmative
247 likessuprcrzy negative 😂
49 likesACombineSoldier lol you’re cringe for responding like that
147 likes@ACombineSoldier its just a comment, dont be so scared lmao
35 likes@I’m Trash kkkkkkkkkkkkkioo
0 likes@Jorge Blanco Your advice should be repeated all over the Internet on a regular bases. You are right, just a comment.
6 likes@Jonny V at some point he mentions that there's a camera on the handicap spot and the officers talk about the footage with him.
1 likeWhite Alliance ??
5 likesjohnb johnb what does a rocket mean? please I’m genuinely curious
0 likes@Jorge Blanco 🤣
0 likes@Terry C Yeah people can't get associate the difference between this and the real world and it's sad.
0 likes@ACombineSoldier The internet schooled you good son
2 likesThat’s soooo accurate
0 likes@suprcrzy hahaha great response to the original comment
1 like@GeneralCurtis3LeMay what are u on about lol
2 likesThe cop told him he saw video and the guy was not coming towards him. The dummy said he disagreed
0 likes@أبو ليلى he knocked him on his as* because he was arguing with his wife. The killer wasnt as smart as he thought.
0 likes@أبو ليلى to be a threat to him he'd have to be threatening him or coming at him. So no its not right but also no a little push and then not coming at him or trying to harm him any farther was not a reason to shoot him kids get pushed on the damn play ground. He wasn't coming at him he didn't harm him seriously he wasn't threatening him he didn't have a weapon. He had no reason to shoot him with his family right there.
0 likesIts because he can't imagine he is in the wrong. No crime was committed from his point of view.
0 likesWell it's all about degrees of escalation, being pushed entitles one to push back or reveal a concealed weapon at most.
2 likesNever go to the ground. Always ends bad for you on the ground . He was definitely going to get stomped out .
1 likeI love his speech. A true warrior, trained by nothing than the best, both of em, battlefield and CoD. He deserves a medal, no, the noble peace prize! Everyone should be a little cop like him. That's how we save america! God bless the USA, Donald Trump and the weapon industrie xD
0 likesThe cops could have directly asked if he thought his life was in danger and he would have said "negative", then still he wouldn't admit that he was in the wrong.
5 likes19 minute ambulance response time to a gunshot victim is prettttty terrible. Nobody going to mention that?
8174 likesReplies (188)
I was actually thinking about that shitty ass response he may have been able to been saved. I feel horrible for those kids who saw their father die in front of em.
1334 likesWhere was it? If it's a bigger city i could understand but if it was a small town then yeah, it's bullshit.
221 likesChances are the hospital was 19 minutes away. That seems close when you don't need a paramedic, but far when you do. They can speed, but generally not by all that much.
397 likes@Umatsu Obossa They are usually on patrol, the possibility is that they were preoccupied or this happened when ambulances were both equally far away from the incident. Meaning that they just happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time
251 likes@Metal Tao Well either way, the comments seem to mean to imply tge ambulance was deliberately slow in getting there, and I'm quite sure that's not the case.
177 likesWithout knowing how far the hospital is away how can you start forming an opinion about the response time?
92 likesAmbulances don’t rush into a shooting incident before police...they are not armed
207 likesThe hospital is like 5 minutes north up Fort Harrison Rd
26 likesI'm a paramedic supervisor with 25 years' experience.
381 likesA couple of things to consider (especially number 2):
1. There are some rural areas where it routinely takes 15 or 20 minutes to get an ambulance. I have no idea where this event occurred, but even in the city where I work, it can sometimes take fifteen minutes. We have approximately 5 to 8 ambulances, covering a city of 200,000 people. One patient can tie up an ambulance for an hour (extricating the patient, transport, cleaning, hand-off report, etc). All it takes is a single accident involving multiple patients, to tie up all of our ambulances.
2. (Most importantly) On a violent call, we don't enter the scene until it's been declared safe by law enforcement. So it's common-practice to "stage" several blocks away from the patient, until we are cleared to go in. This is entirely dependent upon law enforcement, but it's not uncommon for us to find ourselves staging for fifteen or twenty minutes.... or even up to an hour, in some cases.
@Jason Blum Good to have a clear, reasoned, comment with non emotional assumptions, and contrived expertise and knowledge. Thanks.
110 likesAs a paramedic, that's the first thing I noticed. Our average response time is less than 7 minutes and I can't think of any calls that required 19, even in rural areas.
64 likesRidiculous. Sounds wrong it's so bad.
4 likesThey had to stage for law enforcement to clear the scene then they could come in. That time is accounted in that.
13 likesThought the same
1 likeAn ambulance isn’t always just around the corner of any emergency.
23 likesI have a few paramedic friends who’ve shared their regrets that they were the closest unit to a situation but, were still too far away to get there in time enough to save the person in need.
Scene safety is the first thing ems thinks about when entering a dangerous situation. The police must secure the scene to make sure the threat is clear before ems moves in.
22 likesA big honour is being allowed to contribute to send a person to another world. > @Chris Uchiha17
0 likesRobert P in my city the ambulances come from a 3rd party company, not from the hospital itself. That being said, if you don’t how far away the ambulance is from the scene, you can’t really assume the response time.
4 likesCame here to comment this. Unreal...19 minutes?!
5 likesIf it were my friend shot I'd get him into the car and make it to the hospital before the AmberLance is even dispatched. But in some communities people just stand around watching and doing nothing but wait for someone else to help. Like David Dorn. Or that dude the woman ran over, spat on, and slammed the cars back bumper over his head. While everyone just watched.
3 likesI've had an ambulance come quicker for a severe migraine
4 likesI thought the exact same thing
0 likesOk it was terrible..now what?
0 likesThe racism in this entire case makes my blood run cold
10 likesWhen I called 911 for my mother when she stopped breathing, the ambulance took 30 minutes to get there. It's actually scary.
2 likesGG Allyn ems is not notified about the victims race when they are dispatched. The response time would not have been shorter if the guy was white
20 likesSeth Dixon it is in a bad part of town is why so long in my opinion
1 likeImagine how bad if they were already at another site helping someone else.
4 likes@NSA I call BS. It replies like this that is hurting our nation now. Ambulances are not hanging out on every damn corner. Speaking of knowing many drivers.
0 likes@Jason Blum Amen and thank you for doing your job.
3 likes@Michael Julian You live in a small area than. It takes over 20 to get to a local hospital. Less all the traffic in front of every single light. Here the ambulances are also at the Fire Departments.
0 likes@Metal Tao No, in Florida ambulance crews stay at their station until they get called out.
1 likeCould it be possible that the ambulance arrived 19 minutes immediately after the shooting or they arrived 19 minutes after 911 was called
4 likes19 minutes in a rural town is normal.
0 likesthe average response time is around 8-9 minutes, so this response time seemed low , but about 90 percent of all the response times are below about 15 minutes....which means 10 percent of the time they are longer than 15 minutes.
1 likein my area thats pretty good. we only have one ambulance and probably 120 square miles of county lol
0 likes911 dispatcher here:
3 likesAmbulances don't always come from the hospital. In many cases they come from their own private ems/fire station, and are sent by the county/city dispatchers. It's possible that the ambulance in that area was already on another call or transporting, and usually the ems supervisor or dispatch would organize the next closest, or tell the closest that's on a call to break off if they can and head that way. That said, in my area, ambulances won't proceed into any violent calls unless the scene is secure by officers, and that's also a possibility here. There's really no saying exactly what went on with response time without the call report.
@Frank Marano thats not up to anyone to determine! First responders are the only ones who can estimate the type and extent of victim's injuries. 20 min arrival time in a shooting like this ensures pretty much that our guy bled to death but thats easy to say with hindsight.
0 likes@Frank Marano I understand. Its just that I've been in situations where we called 911 (no shooting tho coz this is Europe) and the ambulance always arrived within 5 to 7 min max.
3 likesIt just blows my mind every time that this type of exchange can actually result in a death. Simply bc people are allowed to carry a gun. Where I live this may have been a nasty verbal argument and both parties would leave the place pissed maybe... but alive.
I'm an EMT. The town I grew up in was about 25 minutes from the nearest hospital. Not to mention, the closest ambulance was about 10-15 minutes away from the furthest part of their district. Sometimes we also run into problems when we are taking someone to the hospital while another call comes out. I agree 19 minutes is a long response time, but unfortunately sometimes it happens. That doesn't make it right, I'm just explaining some possible reasons for the 19 -minute response time.
0 likesCops gotta get therenfirst
0 likesI thought I misunderstood that but thank you for clarifying
0 likesBecause America
1 likeClearwater has unbelievable traffic. Some cases if an ambulance pulls up behind you there is literally nowhere to move out of the way.
2 likes@Robert P - Ambulance's don't respond from Hospitals, they are generally private companies and 99.9% of the time they are coming from some point in a zone that they drive around between calls or their Companies location.
1 likeThe average EMS response time in the U.S. is 7 minutes in the Cities and Suburbs to 14 minutes in the more rural parts of the Country, so 19 minutes is definitely NOT a very good response.
Welcome to America. If my memory is correct, the average ambulance response time in America is about thirteen minutes. I'm probably not remembering right, but I do know that the ambulance response time in America isn't very good.
0 likesMy first thought...
0 likesSeth Dixon said by a guy who either lives in a big city....and/or has zero idea regarding EMS....
1 likeRight?? Usually the victim is to the hospital and in the OR by 19 minutes!
0 likesin the uk, a much smaller place than the usa, an ambulance can take hours
5 likes@Riff Raff I said 'in this entire case' I wasn't even referring to the EMS. But thanks for the info that's good to know tbh
0 likesThey always do that where I’m from if they know wherever the bullet hit , head, stomach any main arteries they know 9 times out of ten they won’t make it so they take their time until they’ve passed then pronounce the deceased at the hospital. Sad
0 likes19 minutes is a really long time.. I live 15 minutes from any major town in rural louisiana and my dad had a brain hemorrhage and the ambulance was there in about 5 to 8 minutes. He ended up dying. But I was impressed with how fast they arrived.
0 likesPretty standard time for rural America
0 likes@Umatsu Obossa - There is a lot of traffic there too. I know I have driven in it a million times.
0 likes@ClockzTickin Exactly, I dunno why everyone acting like there's an ambulance on every block. I mean how often do you see an ambulance that isn't actively going to a scene or back to the hospital with sirens blaring? You almost never see them, so I dunno why people expect they should drop out of the sky when you need one.
0 likesYeah it does suck. By the injuries sustained there’s not a whole lot they could have done when they got there anyways. If it hit his lung, he’s gonna need a chest tube immediately and that’s not something paramedics can do unfortunately. To be totally honest though many southern states’ EMS is understaffed. Or at least from my experience. I work in emergency medicine in New Orleans.
2 likesin Iraq we call the ambulance three days before the emergency so they can arrive 2 days after, lol
1 like19 minutes and it costed almost 1000 dollars for it just to show up
0 likes@Umatsu Obossa nobody has implied that the ambulance got there slowly on purpose. That’s so stupid.
0 likesAmbulances often avoid ghettos and take their sweet ass time because ghettos suck
1 likeThe magic words are “motorcycle head injury” believe me...... I know
0 likesEverything's bigger in Texas 😶
0 likesbecause it is reasonable
0 likesFor example I live only 3-4 kilometers of a hospital but it would already take 5 minutes to get here plus probably +-1 min from the end of the call to actually leave the hospital. So if the hospital or fire station is like 10-20 kilometers away a 19 minute response is reasonable. 19 minute. drive isn't long but when you need an ambulance it will feel very long.
0 likesIf that had been the uk it would have been 2 hours +. Quite seriously
1 like@Matt Pike I've been an EMT in a medium sized city, we're stationed so that we have coverage over the city so that one of our ambulances is never more than six minutes away from any location in the city. A nineteen minute response time is abysmal.
0 likes@Caleb McIntosh well in a place like Kansas city, you'd never make it in 6 minutes. Its just too spread out. Even in the small town I live in, you might be waiting for 10 minutes
0 likes@Matt Pike I was in Colorado. It's not different here. In rural routes they try to make sure they have coverage for a 10 minute response time, but this wasn't rural. The only logical reason for that long of a response is if the scene was judged to be unsafe, which it often is with gunshots, but the police should also have a short response time to clear the scene.
0 likesSo you could do better? go ahead!
0 likesWell don’t knock people on the ground . Yu might get shot ** shocking **
0 likesDo the family get a medical bill after the husband dies? I mean how does it work in Murica if you get shot and maybe you don't have any insurance?
0 likes@Robert P Does beg the question though surely? Guy runs in wounded from a gunshot. You'd hope the staff kicked up enough to suggest the ambulance was needed urgently. Otherwise, if the paramedics are certain this guy is toast why bother at all? Then a follow up question: do USA districts have their own legislation over 'acceptable response times'? Anyway, 19 minutes is naff in a life threatening situation (could be anything, 19 minutes is plenty of time to die, do you think people are just hanging around thinking 'yeah, I've got 20 minutes in me no problem' then strike up a conversation about the weather?
0 likes@Lewis Lister Boo man. You get special treatment for unresponsive and not breathing. I appreciate where you're coming from; UK healthcare means if someone is less well than you, guess who gets the ambulance first? This 2 hrs plus thing isn't an accurate account of the whole UK ambulance service but is rooted in some truth I'll give you that.
0 likesIts not nyc.....
1 likeI said the same thing, how?? But when a cat is fractured it takes 3 min to respond, sad 😞.
0 likes@Umatsu Obossa deliberately slow? No. I would say the comments are pointing out that ambulances should be far more available and ready to deal with problems in any area. Rural areas excepted of course.
0 likes@Zei33 it takes longer to get to rural areas, they can just die? They have a limited number of ambulances, any number of which could be out on a call that very moment. You CANNOT make sure there's an ambulances just a few minutes from everywhere at all times, that's ridiculous. The INSTANT one was responding to this, that made the area it used to be in, no longer have one near it either.
0 likesIf the victim had been a wall street krony the time would have improved.
0 likes@Seth Dixon you should do more research, we dont sympathize with the murderer, were just taking a point someone made and making sure it makes sense before we blindly get behind it like ants. 19 minutes in the city is normal, and I don't doubt they were going as fast as they could while also avoiding arriving before the police do, all they are told is that someone was shot and only EMT Officers of private communities are armed.
0 likes@Source everybody reading into my comment a little too deeply, geez. My point was simply, when you’re lying on the ground bleeding out from a gunshot 19 minutes is an agonizingly long time to wait. I’m not suggesting the ambulance stopped for donuts.
0 likesIn my state as a tow truck driver if I do not get to a scene of an accident within 15 minutes I go to jail I get a $5,000 fine and my company gets a $50,000 fine
1 likeTHANK YOU I WAS GOING TO COMMENT THIS!!! i was like wait a damn minute
0 likesDepends where it’s at. It’s slower in rural areas most times, volunteer firefighters are usually first to the scene in my area.
0 likes@Matt Pike my parents live pretty far out in the country. It's a good 20 minute response for ambulances out there. They've seen several car wrecks near their house and it always takes a while to respond.
0 likesSome of you guys haven’t worked a day as a first responder and it really shows. Sometimes we have only have 11 paramedics and 4 Medic One aid cars in the entire COUNTY. Sometimes, units that are available are on the other side of the county. So yes, sometimes it takes units a while to arrive. If you want to whine and complain about the response time, go ahead and apply to be a first responder, God knows we are understaffed and need more people. All the public does is whine and complain, without even knowing what actually goes on behind the scene.
0 likes@Seattle Washington seems like you agree that a 19 minute response time is terrible. Thanks for providing some insight as to why it might take so long. Doesn’t make it any less sucky for the guy bleeding out for twenty minutes.
0 likesI was wondering if they knew he was black. Is that paranoid? Lol
1 like@Umatsu Obossa Ambulances don't come from hospitals, they have depots all over the place where they leave from.
0 likes@WatchMe Noobing better than literally all the other countries if you wanna live, and I'm from the uk
0 likes@Metal Tao Yeah. In Britian here the ambulances are always on road. Not dispatched from the hospital. Theres ambulances all over the road,so there hopefully should be at least one available in the local area who can attend in less than 19 mins.
0 likes@Umatsu Obossa Not one person said the ambulances took a long time deliberately
0 likes@Justice For Seth Rich WWG1WGA That's also correct. In Britain,ambulances cannot attend stabbing or shooting incidents unless police are already on scene, and have declared it safe.
0 likes@Kanye Breast People were REALLY implying it
0 likes@Robert P Because the ambulance wouldnt have been at the hospital
0 likes@Umatsu Obossa So what is if (in your mind) that they are trying to imply then?
0 likes@ShayTheEmpress That isnt true at all
0 likes@Umatsu Obossa it seemed to be about the abysmal time of the response in the situation of a gunshot victim. You attempting to imply that the commentor was making a stance that the ambulance responders had alterior motives is baseless and asinine.
0 likes@Michael Julian I worked in a larger city that also covered county (rural) and it’s taken me an hour to respond before. 19 minutes isn’t unheard of but obviously not the norm or ideal. I would imagine if transport medic wasn’t on scene at least fire or RRV would be there, and who knows how long it took PD to clear the scene
0 likes@Jason Blum thank you for the information.
0 likesBetter then flint of no response time.
0 likes@Angel Face but at least flint (genesee county) has paramedic deputies which is pretty badass
0 likes@Seth Dixon That's a very large leap in logic.... What does the ambulance response time have to do with the shooter? If anything the shooter would be way better off if the response time was faster and the guy lived because of it.
0 likesI agree. But it be like that sometimes for some reasons.
0 likes@Metal Tao ambulances do not go on "patrol" when you see them driving without their lights on it doesn't mean they're patrolling around like a cop would.
0 likesMust be a pretty rough neighborhood
0 likesPolice departments are struggling right now. They are underfunded and understaffed.
0 likes@Chris Uchiha17 most of them are too young to understand tho,
0 likesI had to call an ambulance the other day for a life threatening situation, the estimated time was 40 minutes and the hospital was only 2 minute drive away. They were just exceptionally busy that day
0 likesespecially since you have to pay for it. Terrible medical system in the US
0 likesParamedics had to stage until the police cleared the scene
1 like@Seth Dixon the paramedics have to stage until the police clear the scene my guy
1 like@Michael Julian How many shootings have you responded to?
0 likesThis being America they were probably preoccupied with getting a 600 pound lady off her toilet.
0 likes@Althea McNabb My county is 545 square miles, but we are very well funded.
0 likes@Dude, smell my helmet. in my 25 year career? Hundreds. I am now in an area where they are rare, however and am happy with that.
1 like@Quynh Le You may think I am joking, but we have a special ambulance just for those calls. It has an extra wide stretcher and a winch to pull it into the truck. Google "Bariatric Ambulance"
1 likeSeems pretty standared to me.
0 likesWell we’ll increase ur tax to 50% to fund the ambulance department
0 likesYeah, I was in a car wreck in Nashville and it took about 30 minutes for a response. Not a gun shot but still, too many people and not enough help or funding
0 likes@Jason Blum a big city only has 5-8? My small city has that lol
0 likes@Common Sense Sports It's a Union Fire Department that runs EMS in Nashville. You get a ride to the hospital and that's about it. I work for a nearby department that is, in my opinion the best care you can get in the State.
0 likes@Ben Hardcastle my department receives less than one half of one percent of property tax revenues. By comparison, the school system takes 70% and we still have a fantastic budget. If anyone says they need to raise taxes to pay for good care they are lying.
0 likes@Metal Tao I don’t think ambulances patrol same goes for fire trucks and such. Police are usually first on the scene because they patrol and clear the scene for EMT and such
1 like@Michael Julian Care wasn't bad and the people were extremely professional. Sounded like I was complaining but it was in response to what Seth said. Ambulances and police can't just appear because you need them to is what I was getting at
1 likenot rally doe thats kinda fast. depends on where it is aswell
0 likes. wait the ambulance costs houndreds of dollars? oh ye aits super slow now when i think bout it
@Justice For Seth Rich WWG1WGA thats a problem in my opinion, in my country the abulance whould be there before police (obv if there uis a gang or smthng like that then they arent going in you know)
0 likes@Matt Pike it’s pinellas county FL there are almost 1 million people who live there
1 like@Muffin Mendy ?
0 likesIt's way way too much time
0 likesWhen you have 5 minutes or less
To bleed out
One good thing about state healthcare is that if you are dying someone won’t get their Christmas bonus when the paramedics fail to make their target response time of 3 minutes.
0 likesWell, that's what happens when capitalism runs your healthcare.
1 likeYup horrible response time
0 likes@Metal Tao Where are you that ambulances drive around on patrol? Probably not in america I'm guessing lol
0 likes@Michael Julian
0 likesShooting incidents where shooter is still around?
Welcome to the ghetto where people abuse emergency medical care and call am ambulance for their 3 day abdominal pain and stubbed toe, just to get a ride across town to the hospital and then leave ama because they feel better. Tying up resources for people that need it.
0 likesIs that bad? Emergency response is so bad in my area that I've had the police call me back an hour later when I tried to report an accident I was in and possible injuries. All parties took care of it ourselves and went about our business before 911 answerwd.....
0 likes@Michael Julian thank you!
0 likes@Jeremy White Yes I know what you mean
0 likesLol good to know if I get shot I need to hold on for bout 20 minutes before medical get there
0 likes@May Sanchez Yeah, an ambulance can't teleport they have to get through traffic depending on the hospital location
0 likesYes! And this happened at the fucking parking lot, there were people with cars, somebody could've brought him to hospital. This whole situation seems so stupid. Almost like everyone around just accepted the fact that this man is going to die.
0 likesBut yeah, I wasn't there, so I guess (hope) there is a logical explanation.
@justanon Probably the fact that someone had a gun, he just got shot in the chest, it was their altercation, and the bystander effect. To be honest I think they're both stupid. Guy probably should've minded his own business but they also parked illegally. He also blind sided the guy but he was also screaming at the guys girlfriend. The other guy pushed drew a gun (fine) but then shot a man backing up who was no longer a threat. Pretty bad decisions from everyone
0 likesYou should always go to the hospital yourself unless you have no choice but to wait for the ambulance. Emts rarely deal with extreme emergencies. Some (pointless) procedures/panic/lack of experience slows them down.
1 like@Matt Pike , that's pretty weird because the average response time in that county is 4-6 minutes. Or so they boast.
0 likes@Umatsu Obossa , the ambulances aren't stationed by the hospital. EMS stages all over the county to give as much even coverage as possible. Possibly a lot of other things were going on that day.
0 likes@Persephone yep
0 likes@fox23vaj That is not how that works at all but you can assume that
0 likesTo be fair, I think a good amount of that time had to be spent waiting on the police. Ambulances can't just waltz on in to help someone who got shot, the police need to make sure that there's no chance anyone else gets shot.
0 likesNow should it have taken 19 minutes from the call to the ambulance to clearing the scene to then go help the guy? Probably not, it shouldn't really take 19 minutes to confirm that the "threat" only fired in "self defense" thus the scene is safe.
Yeah I was thinking that too. It is Florida though. This wasn't the only "Florida man" causing problems that day, I guarantee.
0 likes@Jason Blum And number 3. (imo as a basic EMT, not a paramedic) given that this guy was shot through both lungs and the [presumably] base of his heart, he probably wouldn't have survived even if he had gone directly into an ambulance. Is that a pretty fair assumption?
0 likes@CreamPuff Yeah, not if your migraine had somehow been the result of a violent crime with no law enforcement on scene, you wouldn't
0 likes@mufason That's my guess. The prosecutor later says it was "the perfect shot" to kill the man. Through both lungs and the heart. I don't think he would have survived if he'd been shot like that inside a trauma center
0 likes@Two meals a day. Based on the description of the injuries, I can't see how he wouldn't have bled out, even if the paramedics could have gotten him right away. Both lungs and the heart. You don't come back from that kind of trauma unless he could have gotten to a level one or two trauma center within a few minutes, I would guess.
0 likes@Joshua Barker emtb here. Don't you think he would have probably died anyway, even if the ambulance had been there when it happened? I can't say I've ever heard of anyone surviving a shot through both lungs and the heart.
0 likes@Matt Pike they park ambulances everywhere. Look closely next time you drive around you might think they are napping but their job is to be called upon in hotspots in town
0 likesrelying on the government? weak
0 likesThat's what I’m saying!!
0 likesThey would have just collected the corpse earlier in this case. With the projectile having gone through lungs and the heart, he might have died just mere seconds after getting shot.
0 likes@J that’s why in my liberal socialist utopia the ambulances show up within two seconds of gunfire.
0 likesMaking your way through Clearwater is difficult. The Prosecutor indicated that the bullet pierced his Heart; even if the Rig had arrived in 2- minutes, the likelihood of him surviving is about. 0%.
0 likes@Justice For Seth Rich WWG1WGA First rule of ALS... "Scene Safety"
0 likes@Matt Pike It was in Clearwater Florida
0 likesHe got shot through the heart man I don’t know if any better response time would have made a difference.
0 likes@K B Yeah, no they're not.
0 likesright like did they walk there or what
1 likeYeah he might have not died if they would have shown up within a decent amount of time . Sad
0 likesI feel like that's normal because police have to respond and declare the area safe for medical personnel before they can arrive on scene
0 likes@Robert P I am just spoiled on Phoenix response time, which is a few minutes. And also I am like "What could have prevented this?" about Marquis death. I assume everyone was doing their best. Everyone but the killer.
0 likesWhen seconds count, help is just 20 minutes away.
0 likes@Michael Julian my question to you is this? What would be the motivation for the paramedics to take their time? I guess I simply don't see the point. Is this comment section meant to say it's because he was black? I don't think they mention that on the calls do they? If so that's unfortunate and unforgivable imo
0 likesthis is exactly what i was thinking why the hell did it take 19 minutes bruh
0 likesIts fucking insane and terrifying
0 likes@Umatsu Obossa Here near Brisbane, it's actually quite common to see an ambulance on the prowl heading towards Ipswich, and in a few others near Brisbane. I more often hear them than see them.
0 likes@Anna Oddi Having their siren on means they're headed to a call, not "on the prowl"
0 likes@Umatsu Obossa I meant they don't have sirens on, so they may be just heading back to the office, but more often than not, they do go to emergencies. Sorry to confuse you.
0 likes@Anna Oddi You said you HEAR them more than you see them, so how is that they don't have sirens on? And most often they turn them off on the way to the hospital, even with a passenger on board.
1 likeIt's Clearwater. Fl. That's pretty usual.
0 likeswow, people get mad for 19 minutes while i wait for them minimum 90 minutes in my world 3rd country..
0 likesAnyone saying this is normal for rural areas- this is clearwater Florida, not even close to rural. This is a big city, known for beaches and for being the headquarters of scientology. Theres a hospital right down the road from where this happened. My guess is that it took so long because of a combination of horrible traffic (it can easily take 10-20 minutes to drive right down the road in some parts of pinellas county) and a lesser priority for being in a "bad part of town". Clearwater has its shining facades for tourists but there are a lot of poor and poorly maintained areas. Cops like to take their time when it comes to a case likely involving poor people or addicts.
0 likesIt really surprises me at the number of people in these comments who actually think ambulances can get there in mere minutes DURING AN ACTIVE SHOOTING, and that any minute passed where they don’t get the victim is somehow “deliberate” on their part for not getting there sooner.
0 likesOr that if you make mention of this, you’re “defending” the ignorant suspect. Do you all seriously lack basic critical thinking?
That is not how this works. That’s not how the protocol works. That’s not how they’re trained. REAL LIFE IS NOT LIKE THE MOVIES. They don’t get to just rush on the scene and everything magically be okay.
The emergency services knew it was an active shooting, but no paramedic — I repeat, NO PARAMEDIC — can enter the scene until it is safe. You all understand that, right?
When an active shooting is going on, they have to make sure the scene is secure and suspects apprehended before they can tend to the victim. That is protocol, no matter what your feelings are on the situation. It’s done that way so there isn’t anymore senseless deaths (and there have been towards paramedics who arrived on an active shooting scene that has also been killed by the suspect because they were trying to tend to the victim — THAT is what they want to prevent: more senseless deaths).
@Lauren W It was a scene with an active shooter. Paramedic and first responders can’t enter an area during an active shooting until the scene is secured to prevent any more senseless deaths. This is basic common sense.
0 likesTo also add: they have to secure the scene, make sure there are no any other suspects.
Do you know how many paramedics and first responders have been killed for tending to victims during an active shooter scene? Too many. This isn’t like tending to a heart attack victim or someone getting in a vehicular accident — there was an angry suspect who had shot someone during a hostile situation. They had to make sure the scene was clear with no other suspects or even any other victims in the vicinity that may have not been reported. They got there as soon as they could, point blank. Unless you are a first responder who has been in this situation, I don’t think it’s fair to bring up how close hospitals were during a situation like this. If anything, it’s disingenuous and makes it seem like you’re blaming the first responders more so than the shooter for doing this and causing an active shooter scene.
Way too many of you don’t bother looking into the protocols and go straight to blaming the people who spend their lives training and trying to help/save others because you think you could do better with 20/20 hindsight after the situation.
@Robert P - Good point. But I’m sure you know almost every commenter on here knows the whole story and everyone’s motivations and intentions. They wouldn’t be just talking out of their ass and slinging around judgements based on no evidence. No way, not YouTube commenters.
0 likesin my country it takes 5- 6 hours
0 likesdefinitely have to make sure the scene in safe so cops show up and do what they need to do and they get word out that medics can come in usually
0 likesLOL here in Brazil it takes about 1-3 hours
1 like@Ke -I- yep he uses "scare quotes " early on when referring to "people" (meaning black people)
0 likes@Addie Alexander no not paranoid
0 likesHe wants as much sympathy as possible with that hand BS. You can really tell he has never been in a fight because being pushed down wouldn't leave you sore all over unless it's down some stairs or something
2 likesHow is it they failed to charge the man right off when the one of the first things he says is a lie. He claims that he was hit from behind. Nowhere was he touched from behind. Even though she threw his firearm he paused as the man turned to walk away from him. You cannot shoot somebody who's retreating from you. That's murder.
5 likesFirst thing he did was assumed Authority he didn't have by accosting the female, and taking up an aggressive stance towards her and this man's protecting his girlfriend. Which he had every right to do. This man started the altercation and then escalated it to murder.
I wonder if he’s straight up lying or does he think this is the way he remembers things
1 likeThe Vidio tells the truth
I love how Drejka's arm is pitifully limp when he wants it to be, then perfectly fine at other moments.
3 likesPeople like Michael Drejka subconsciously assume that the law is on their side, which is why they have no fear of cooperating with the police in a self-incriminating manner. It's also why he feels there'll be no consequences to shooting someone as long as you cooperate and perform in the right way.
1951 likesReplies (44)
Hun, people like Michael Drejka don't KNOW the law, and that is the problem.
49 likesIf he didn’t have a gun he wouldn’t have even said anything to the woman in the car. Lol
100 likesEspecially when he kills a black man. He thinks the law will understand and not care either.
73 likesHit the nail on the head, I hate people like them so much
15 likes@Local_Brain_Error // Synaptic_Misfire_Detected 💯
4 likesYup because he's white. The privilege is strong.
29 likesBc he’s a white man
10 likesEven if you take a video of yourself killing an entire buses worth of people and show it to the police and give them the recording you absolutely do not talk to police without a lawyer present.
12 likes@j d Yeah and that's why a mostly white jury found him not guilty. Oh wait...
4 likesIt's scary how trigger happy people are. Gonna be this way with Rittenhouse too. Provoking people, history of aggressive behavior, no attempt to retreat or diffuse situation (during first shooting) all caught on various videos on YouTube. It really, really ruins your chance of having a legitimate defense case.
8 likesBecause he thinks he’s the law
2 likes@Nicholas Ramey No bs. I know people like him, grew up with some. They are all rough and tough with a gun playing super hero. But without they're scared little rats.
4 likes@Nicholas Ramey I read him like a book the moment he started talking to those cops man. Trust me I know him, with that gun he feels like a cop/military man/guard/security a HERO. Take that gun away he’s not approaching random strangers to tell them to move their cars I promise you. It’s like that for a lot of people not just him. They are so freaking rough and tough with a gun !
7 likesI used to feel like the cops were on my side. I know better now!
1 like@Ms Gigi Yea you shouldn’t kill people that walk away from you.
1 likeThat’s called write privilege.
1 likeHe didn't do anything wrong in his mind
1 likeHe was defending himself. Didnt you see the video? Its all good to push someone from behind while being in the wrong (meaning parking in the wrong spot). Ngga got what he deserves.
0 likes@Local_Brain_Error // Synaptic_Misfire_Detected sure, another psychic.
0 likes@Wize Wolf has nothing to do with race
0 likesOr... Here's a contraversial idea... He actualy defended himself and wasnt planning on killing nobody? Hence not feeling in the wrong?
0 likes@Nicholas Ramey I agree. It escalated too quickly. I guess im more disappointed at judical system and the investigators who were actively trying to trip the man up into talking himself into trouble. I mean you cant say 'oh he WANTED to kill him' based on minute words or actions you can interpret many other ways... 'oh, he said ALMOST so he is definitely racist!'... etc. etc. Thats petty and not serious. The prosecution talk at the end... Man THAT was some serious speculative word sallad. They are basically manipulating emotions and facts. I mean you can play the video EVEN SLOWER to make it seem like the dude was a bad person, like he had million years to think... When in reality, when i saw tbe video the first time, wasnt biased or anything, nothing seemed off or bad. But when yiu slow it down you manipulate it to appeal to the jury... This is dirty. This is not law... Its some sort of game.
0 likes@Woodsaras What makes u so sure?
0 likes@Nicholas Ramey @sinkiy was right and the narrator even said it at 34:15 so maybe watch the full video and understand that white privilege does exist. And by pretending it doesn’t you are only adding to the problem. White privilege doesn’t mean you are rich or have a stable income. It means when you are a young innocent person walking down the street minding your own business you don’t feel as if you “match the description” or as a mother you won’t have to think this is the day my child won’t come home because of the people who were supposed to protect me. Don’t make assumptions about the black community just like you dont want sinkiy to make assumptions about this random guy. If you want to stay in your bliss ignorance than stay there but don’t tell people who have gone through such trauma from a young age that their issues don’t exist or their being overly dramatic because you don’t know how that could affect them and how ignoring the bigger issue just breeds hatred. I’m not saying that everyone in the black community is a saint because we are all human, I’m saying that we all matter. Sorry for such a rant I just had to get this off my chest because if reading all of these comments and for those who read the whole thing, thank you for reading this and I hope you have an amazing day. 😊
1 like@Wize Wolf Could you please make a longer question? I dont know what you are refering to, sir.
0 likes@Woodsaras you responded to me saying this incident was not about race. I asked you what makes you so sure?
0 likes@Wize Wolf Well, you have to prove that it is. It is the burden of the prosecution to prove something like that beyond reasonable doubt. In my eyes its impossible. How can you prove a motif like that? You dont know what the person thinks or feels. I mean, just because the races of the murderer and the victim are different, it doesnt make it automatically a racial crime. A crime is a crime and i dont see how race can play into that. I mean, unless is its something like kkk march or something. I dont understand the whole hate crime subsection especially when used in neutral contexts like this one. I hope i was elaborste. English is not my first.
0 likesSame goes for, sexual orientations, disabilities and other minority groups. You cant project the motive onto the criminal, unless he himself CLEARLY states it in various ways. Breivik for example, had the whole manifesto written about the political party he opposes, and proudly motivated his actions. It was clear he was ultra nationalist right affiliate, extremist.
0 likesPeople throw the race thing around way too lightheartedly and with no clear grounds for that. It became a fad, and being called racist realy doesnt do anything because of that.
0 likes@Woodsaras although I agree it doesn't make it racial just because of the people involved you have to look at the situation as a whole. Down south. The man thought he was fine with berating a black woman with kids in the car. So he had no regard for who was present. He was quick to shoot the guy who was not advancing towards him. He acted very non chalant about what happened. Acted like the police would understand and it was no big deal. Faked his arm was hurt to garner sympathy that the black man was out of control and he had no choice but to out him down. His language he used to justify the shooting and once again showing no remorse.
0 likesHe may have not be a racist. But instinct tells me he is. And just because I can't prove it doesn't mean he wasn't. And you can't prove he wasn't either.
And your English is very good.
@Wize Wolf Well, you cant incriminate people based on instinct, thats what im saying. Knowing that he previously had altercations with other people (where the gun was also involved, but not used) again, he may be just that kind of person. If we force categories on every crime then its absurd. Man killes his wife, then it means it was a sexist crime... lol... How about its JUST a simple, old school crime with no irrelevant addons? // Anyway, Lets not pretend that he wasnt pushed violently also. Its not hard to react impulsively in a situation like that. Its easy to judge for us and the jury when you can slow the video down, think for an hour about it, analyze, sitting warmly and safely in the security of our own houses, analyse the steps, when and where one was stepping all that jazz..... but in the reality of the moment its a whole different game. Im no lawyer but and dont know ALL the details, but based on the accents of this video i see a reasonable doubt. Im with the defence on this one. Listening to the prosecution at the end made me hate the judical system overall. Its an emotional theatre and a contest of "who frames the crimes better" not realy based on cold facts. Since, you can interpret facts as you wish like shown in the video, when the dude cries when talking about his dogs... the defence gonna frame it "oh, he's sympathetic and has a heart"; prosecution: "vile person! self pity!"... hence reducing a whole person/personality to a one-dimentional and ridiculous. unhuman degree... One accidental word BAM youre racist! Its ridiculous. Of course, prosecution framed it in the worst possible light not caring where the actual basis for that or not... I dont see why they put such a big emphasis on "remorse", or "feeling guilt"... you can see that in the comments under these type of videos also. What does it matter? Its stupid. It should be irrelevant at the very LEAST. If one thinks that a person cant be remorseful and try to avoid jail at the same time... he's very naive! Life is not some primitive tv soap opera. Imagine your disabled parent youve been caring for years just died... you can feel sad because you lost your parent, relieved/happy because a huge burden of caring for an old person is lifted from you, and now you will be able to start a new chapter of your life (hopeful!), maybe you can feel angry because, your parent actualy set you back consderably and you have no wife, was forced to have two jobs, which you hate in order to take care of him... you can also feel ashamed and angry at yourself for thoughts like these, because he is your godamn parent who took care of you when YOU needed it... etc. etc. etc. etc. All these emotions at the same time! Everchanging! And what the lowyers do.. they take only a small part of that whole personality, a small subset of what that person is, and feels... and highlights, blows it out of proportion to further their own cause/goal (to defend, to prosecute...) .... That why using stuff like that is very, very stupid and should be irrelevant. Yet, we always hear people preaching about criminals.
0 likes@Woodsaras I can tell that you're young/naive because you don't seem to realize that "tricking" you into "talking yourself into trouble" is the entire point of these kinds of interrogations. It's not something these cops just did to this one guy, it's what all cops do to all guys nationwide. It's all a build up to court, they'll use anything they can to secure a conviction
0 likes@privileged um, thats exactly what im saying. Hence in the process, their goal is not the objective truthseeking, its incriminating, bending every neutral fact towards their goal.... With a huge ass bias, thats why the situation is absurd. Ive read many psychological assesments of criminals... Man, that is sad. In stead lf being objective, those 'experts' give them, no chance! If youre being bad in prison - you're bad! If you're being good - you're just acting for some egoistical cause... Prejudical damning and judgement just jumps out of the paper. Seems like painting people and personalities in the worst possible light, giving no chance of redemption... not caring for the Actual, which is offten times unknowable. Im mean people in prisions are screwed big time. No ones interested in actualy rehabilitating them. Its all theatre. And wheather im young or naive thats deffinitely off topic. I see big difference between finding out whether one is guilty or not vs. finding ways for him to be as guilty as possible.... There's a lot of latter when there should be only the first one
0 likes@Woodsaras i don't know what you're saying.. the interrogation process isn't pretty but in these cases they get a ton of info out of questioning people & there are super clearly defined boundaries, that's why they're recorded to show that there wasn't any 'improper questioning' etc & you can always just not say anything to them.. I'm not sure what an alternative would be. But i mean yes every prosecutors office in the country is set up to secure convictions & a lot of them use this metric as their main goal while at work, which as you can see results in overzealously just throwing as many people as you can in jail for anything possible.
0 likes@Nicholas Ramey Absolutely i speculate he's racist, why else would he almost proudly admit he killed this black guy that he keeps describing as a 'thug' 'animal' etc? We can speculate on why that is all day but the point stands that if he was black & just killed a white kid he would be insane to try that which you already agreed to. Hell even if it was a white kid he killed, he would not have used those words & he probably wouldn't have been so "scared" as to shoot him as he walks away. You seriously think it would have went down the same way? Do you live in the same world as everyone else...?
1 like@Wize Wolf Here comes the racism comment 😆
0 likes@Tamara Manheim Second racism comment 👍
0 likes@j d And there I spot the third one👍
0 likes@f Trigger happy? If you would suddenly fell to the ground and you had a guy standing above you,, then you wouldn't feel scared right? Of course not😏
0 likesWe used to be emperors of the earth, now people kill us by the trillions n shit
0 likes@Nicholas Ramey damn bro how's that boot taste?
0 likes@Nicholas Ramey did he tell the truth tho? He said his assailant took 3 steps towards him and we clearly saw he didn’t. (Well that’s what I saw I don’t know what your rose colored lenses perceived). You also said he owned up to his actions, well when confronted with the evidence that the events didn’t transpire the way he recounted he didn’t own up to his mistake instead he doubled down. So let me know where and when you saw a mature responsible adult being portrayed, I’ll wait.
0 likes@Woodsaras the split second decision to pull out his gun was a pure demonstration of intent. It was slowed down to get a better breakdown of what happened. But if you’ve ever been in a court you’d know the jury had probably seen the video a multiple times in real time as well as slowed down. The point is in a split second the plaintiff decided that being pushed to the ground after initiating the conflict that he was not going to tolerate that disrespect and made the decision to escalate the situation even further by withdrawing his weapon and shooting the defendant. If he had a moment of hesitation or the defendant even made a move towards him in a menacing way then his shooting would’ve been justified. But that was not the case and that measured the intent in the defendant. Even though he was in no imminent danger he still decided to shoot.
0 likes@cdskilla bro, im just too tired to argue with stupid people. i said what i wanted to say already. read more, read more thoroughly i dunno, some people cant be helped
0 likesthe moment the victim backed off, the self defense case was dead.
1 likesure, he shouldn't have been pushed, that was uncalled for... but what was truly uncalled for was getting shot for it. The victim and his wife were being assholes, but the punishment for the crime of being an asshole isn't death.
Never talk to the cops even if you believe you are 100% in the right. Ask for a lawyer.
0 likes"My upbringing,,, ' I'm a ranch kid, we own several firearms and never was I raised to have a pre-conceived opinion of any fellow human being based on their skin color or the language they speak. I'm disgusted by this guy, yeah, I own a gun too, it has a permit and I don't feel a need to carry it everyday since I was 22 and I don't have private parking lot I go play sheriff in. I DO have a disabled tag, and on days when I'm doing well, I don't use it, someone probably needs it more that day. I feel so sorry for this family that they had to encounter this concrete cowboy , these children had to watch their father die because some lunatic feels the need to personally enforce every state law and carry a gun "like a big boy."
2 likesReplies (1)
@Mystery Minx Did that good ranch learnin' teach you to not put your hands on someone over words? Because that's the direct precursor to this.
0 likesIf I came out of the store and someone was screaming at my wife like that, I would do the same thing. The guy didn't deserve to die for standing up for his wife.
26 likesReplies (6)
You got 5 seconds to look at the guy and size him up as your walk to him,if he's twice your size you'll push him over still but then what ?
1 likeFoolish! Both of these men overreacted to the entire situation.
0 likesHomie just had to confront whoever was parked there.. smh. And there was absolutely no need for the father to escalate the situation by shoving the guy to the ground.
When you live in a state like Florida, you gotta know what's up! In a "stand your ground" state, shoving someone like that could very likely lead to you taking your last breath.. When people like to shoot first then ask questions later, it leads to people losing their lives over trivial nonsense.
Some shit just isn't worth fighting/arguing over. I mean a damn parking spot! This man/father lost his life over a damn parking spot.
If it were just his wife in the car, I'ld say he was being overprotective. But with the kids.... I really can't blame the guy.
1 like@emordnilaP you condone pushing someone like that for a verbal dispute ?
0 likes@clive henry Unless I’m mistaken, witnesses said that the shouting match got pretty heated. And the man’s kids were in the car as well.
1 likeI wouldn’t commend it, but I wouldn’t condemn a guy for reacting like that.
@clive henry I wouldn't say condone. He shouldn't have done it, but I understand. The video doesn't have audio, but considering what we know about the guy, what do you think he was saying? I imagine he was being quite threatening. Plus the woman was sitting in the car, he was standing there. It would have been obvious to the victim that this guy approached the vehicle to yell at her. They also weren't on equal ground. Even if we aren't conscious of it, we read someone sitting down as passive, when someone else is standing during a conversation. The standing person has a great advantage if an altercation becomes physical. Plus this was a total stranger.
0 likesPut it all together, the man came across as a threat. Sure, the victim SHOULD have told the guy to back off first. But I think it's understandable if his instincts took over seeing a threat to his children, and their mother.
He definitely failed the psych eval when he tried to join the army out of high school and has never gotten over it.
2243 likesReplies (32)
Can u explain what the psych eval is?
3 likes@ioiaxopanel I think Psychiatrist Evaluation? Like they do a physical one, a mental one, an emotional one... or probably theres only 2, physical and psych evaluation.
25 likesI dont know, I've never took it but I think that's what it is meant.
☠️🤣
3 likesNo he's calm the whole time. He was pissed because he got pushed down hence he shot him.
2 likeshas anyone ever heard the saying, "I ain't a killer but don't push me"?
3 likes@Crime League what does race have to do with it ?
2 likesNever had a psych eval when I joined...
1 likeIdk if Americans see this the same way, but as an outsider this here seems like a clear case of racism gone way too wild.
6 likes@ioiaxopanel a psych evaluation is where a pyschiatrist/psychologist determines the person's mental state, like if they have any mental illnesses that could interfere with serving or if they have homicidal ideation or sociopathic tendencies. It's to weed out recruits whose mental state isn't stable enough to serve.
1 like@ioiaxopanel I don't know if the army uses a different test, but a regular psychological evaluation is over 500 questions long and fucking sucks.
1 likeI never took a psych eval lmaoooo idk maybe u meant ASVAP but that has nothing to do with testing someone’s mental state more intelligence
0 likesmaybe thats why gun ownership and permits need to have psych evalutions too, I dont get america and im one of them ugh
4 likes@Santiago oliva the problem with that is then u are creating a minority report calling people criminals when they haven’t committed a crime. So keeping someone from having a gun just cus they seem like a violent person but they never committed a violent act in their life would be a minority report
0 likes@Santiago oliva I have multiple guns I’m in the army and I use guns all the time guns has never been a problem of the US, criminals have. I understand if u can stop someone from committing a crime that’s a good thing I get it but when u categories a whole group of people as criminals and strip them of their rights just because they seem like they are high risk that’s a minority report now I’m not saying people with server metal illnesses should be allowed to own a gun I believe they shouldn’t I’m saying a psych eval isn’t a good way to keep guns from potential criminals especially if most criminals disregard the law in the first place and get guns illegally. Most gun crime is done with illegal weapons anyways. In California 99% of all gun crime is done with illegal weapons psych eval won’t keep criminals from committing crimes with guns
1 like@Hermes oh and where do you get your fake stats? And do you really believe them? And are you delusional enough to think stats you cant fact check will convince anyone with more than 1 brain cell? I would go on but there are too many holes in what you say to care
2 likes@Hermes but let me blow your mind. That stat saying most crime is done by illegally obtained guns... where were those guns originally purchased? Look it up, that stat includes guns bought in one state, and sold in another, not from a black market or anything like that, but people you wouldnt normally label as criminals. Say ex army vets that were dishonorably discharged? LoL Brother, youre so far gone you cant see and thats cute
3 likes@Santiago oliva and hence the people who purchase weapons from them are getting them illegally all your doing is proving my point doesn’t matter if they get them 3rd party they are still getting them illegally plus most people who get illegal firearms are getting them made for them illegally most are not buying them 3rd party this makes it harder to track because there is no serial number attached to the gun because a factory never made it hence a ghost gun
0 likesI never took a psych eval. 🤷♂️
1 like@Hermes Human evolution and societies struggles have always stemmed from greed and hatred, both things synonymous with Gun and Gun violence, you not willing to hear people out even if thats not your experience is beyond saving, this VERY STUPID. like I said, whether you believe your nonsense or you know the problem and are a part/dont want to fix it, just shows your character.
0 likes@Hermes my Sweet Jesus, I was done with you honestly but now... So you sent a link to CDC which im sure you didnt even fully read, if you did then didnt understand, because it proves me more on the right than yourself. then you post a link to an opinion piece based on a REPUBLICAN rep from New york state that has since been voted out of office now that trump people arent the majority. last but not least you send a link to a sketchy PDF that wont even load... buddy, youre part of the problem whether you want to admit it or not
0 likesJoined the Marine Corps with depression and full spectrum ADHD, you'd have to be stark raving mad to fail a military psych eval, like 'straight jacket' crazy. The psych eval doc is basically your recruiter.
2 likes@fox23vaj bro my god, are you serious or was that hyperbole? like was your psych eval actually done by your recruiter???
0 likes@Santiago oliva Hyperbole, as in how easy the psych eval is to pass.
0 likesMy friend had the same thing happened to him
0 likesThey dont really do a psych eval
0 likes@fox23vaj if you say you have depression that's an automatic disqualification
0 likes@Michael Sieber Never said i told them, ju said i had it
1 likeSantiago oliva you obviously don’t do your research. Once guns are gone there is always a spike in every other weapon category because if people want to kill they will find ways to kill.
0 likesSantiago oliva you sound authoritarian saying people don’t need power.
0 likes@Hermes ah you think that being diagnosed with a mental illnes means automatically that you are violent and/or a criminal
0 likesOr is that just how you see those with a mental illnes.
Damn. I got diagnosed 7 separate times for being violent and/or a criminal then...
@Chris Brooks YOU cannot be serious, how many people are killed in gun accidents every year.eg, cleaning, hair triggers.......?
0 likes"you sound authoritarian saying people don’t need power." ...really?
ordinary people may say they WANT power, only an authoritarian would claim he NEEDS power.
I'll LEAVE IT TO YOU TO WORK OUT WHY YOUR 1ST STATEMENT IS EVEN MORE FALLACIOUS THAN THE OTHER TWO!
@Chris Brooks I would never ever bet my life on that...
0 likesleaving a gun on a table loaded and cocked for a year also does not seem like a smart thing to do, but I get your point
He still thinks he’s right. Wouldn’t even say he would have chosen to just mind his own business.
2 likesThis guy was such a turd man.. doing what he did was one thing and just downright horrible.. (while illegally parked in the middle of the street btw)…but the guy literally pulled a gun on 4 other occasions. Including an instance against a woman with two children.. this guy was out of control and an absolute freak.
2 likesAll he had to do is mind his own business....
13 likesYou can tell that during his reenactment, he was reliving his emotions. Delusional old man...
0 likesFascinating to watch this guy gleefully provide more and more damning facts against himself because he’s certain he did everything perfectly and that the cops are on his side. “Oh no he was further away than that, keep backing up.” “No I didn’t say a word to him and he didn’t say a word to me.”
1056 likesReplies (12)
Doing the interrogator's job for him lmao.
44 likesThat's still within 21 feet, so... he felt he was right.
2 likes@CharlieTheTexan without a weapon
0 likesCharlieTheTexan Well his “feeling” was absolutely incorrect now wasn’t it?
0 likes@E Riv Yes. It was. Astute observation.
1 likeBut that matters little, seeing as how old boy is still just as dead now as he was then.
Face of someone who wanted to cash in his “while male privilege” card. Thankfully justice won.
1 likeIn this case, as well as in the Michael Dunn case, it all starts with this class of people who think that they are entitled to break the law.
0 likesin this case it was the selfish woman who parked illegally (in a handicapped spot), and in the Michael Dunn story, the thugs blasting music in close proximity of others trying to mind their own lives, but can't due to these people who have NO place in civilized society. And, when others try to defend themselves, or try to ask the miscreants to stop breaking the law (i.e. illegal parking, illegal noise violation), they are the ones who end up in prison. Society in these here United States of America, has become unbearable over time, due to this unfortunate evolution of society into one where one particular class of people makes life miserable for others
@E Riv Bullshit.
0 likesAloydius Devander Abercrombie If you “bullshit” you mean absolute undeniable FACT then yea you bet 🤦♂️😂🤣
0 likes@E Riv FR. Timmy is the kind of guy who would probably do the same thing as Mike and expect to be treated like a hero by the cops. Some ppl rlly need to have a reality check lmfao.
0 likes@Vitorruy1 Well, the video told people everything they need to know. The interrogation just made all the defense arguments weak. I mean the defense actually told the jurors to discount the video because it wasn’t uncompressed, high definition television.
0 likes“If Mr. Draco hadn’t pulled a gun, what would have happened to him.” Uh… his feelings would be hurt, he’d have some bruises and feel humiliated, and he could have called the cops and have the other guy arrested for assault. Instead, he murdered a guy because he got hurt after confronting a woman in a car with her children. How would the same guy reacted if he found some black (or white) guy confronting his wife at their car containing his kids?
@Timmy Vawwter They both ended up in prison because they used a gun to settle a problem that if they hadn’t had a gun would have resulted in angry words. Both men were busy bodies who took matters into their own hands because they felt strong and brave because they had guns.
0 likesso many issues in this world could be avoided if people just minded their own business.
5 likesReplies (1)
so true
0 likes“I’ve never been in that situation before” Like he didn’t put himself in that situation.
10 likesAre detectives always on the side of the prosecution, even when the suspect's guilt is not certain? This question doesn't specifically relate to this case since there is video evidence and he is clearly guilty. But I'm just wondering since it seems like the detectives often assume the suspect is guilty and lead the questions in a way that will trick them into saying self-incriminating things. I feel like even an innocent person would fall victim to their clever tactics.
0 likesReplies (1)
They dig towards what they suspect to be true in order to prove it. I think that in a more complicated case they would be pressing multiple people simultaneously.
0 likesI was fine up until the actual shooting.
4 likesWhile yes his argument with the lady wasn't necessary, he wasn't doing much wrong when the father pushed him. At that point the man pulled his gun, in this scenario, i say it would be necessary. But only to get them away.
By that point the father was backing up as soon as he saw the weapon as the video shows, he backed up, stood still and was shot or turned to his right and was shot. By that time there is no danger to the man, the father didn't have a gun, a knife, he was standing still, not advancing. He even backed up once he saw the gun.
Originally i thought "Self defense". But the video, thankfully there was one, shows that self defense was taken a step too far and turned into murder.
Replies (2)
Not murder, he could have had a gun and was turning to conceal his own draw. If he didn't want to get shot, he should have just stood there with hands up.
0 likesI think the same thing. The guy lost any claim to self-defense the moment he opened fire on him as at that point, he's the aggressor
1 likeIronically, that defense lawyer was arrested for pushing his ex-wife to the ground and kicking her. Not a joke.
1146 likesReplies (32)
You cant be serious, that's crazy.
64 likesWell shit 😂
10 likesCause she was cheaten around
7 likes@Manly Man'yo found the defense lawyer
158 likesShe didn't shoot him though, because she knew that although a kicking sucks, it probably won't kill you. Lol.
57 likesDo you have an article or anything that proves this I would like to read it so I can laugh at him
9 likesironic
1 like@Si74l0rd Stupid way to think, if you're getting kicked on the ground you are 100% clear to defend yourself with lethal force. People get killed all the time from getting kicked in the sides.
22 likesTrevena?
0 likes@yuun paan you on ever comment thread in here being a degen to defend the wrong side. I love it
9 likes@yuun paan Found Mr Dreika
9 likes@Sweet Willy gotta agree with them though if I got shoved to the ground by an adult male and kicked around gonna do what it takes to stop that even if its lethal
7 likes@Sweet Willy that being said the wife and the man in the video are very different this guy was clearly eager to kill someone
7 likes@Wayne Amelie hAhA funny meme
0 likesAnd that reflect on his case how?
2 likes@yuun paan I’m not exactly saying you’re wrong here, but I don’t entirely agree with that. I think being on the ground is a justifiable reason to feel threatened enough to defend yourself, and a somewhat justifiable reason to even fear for your life. But I think the lethality of being in that position comes from the possibility of being kicked, but instead from the possibility of getting your head stomped on. You can crush a person’s skull doing that. And even if it wasn’t enough to kill you, that kinda shit can induce seizures.
6 likes@Si74l0rd Unless you get kicked by Mirko Cro Cop. Ever hear of "right kick hospital, left kick cemetery" ??? 🤣
4 likes@PotawatomiThunderNew Yes absolutely being on the ground leaves you open to being stepped on the neck, they can kick your sides and puncture your lungs etc. But that still is only possible if they charge towards you. There is a gap they need to close to be able to do those things to do. He already had his gun aimed and pointed at the guy before the guy even stepped backwards. There was no aggressive movement. He was literally retreating before the shot was fired. He had time to meditate on the thought of shooting a retreating target. It was simply not logically or legally able to be considered self defense.
0 likesIronic. My problem with defense lawyers in these cases is they'll get you to embellish things, to try and justice a killing.
1 like@Manly Man'yo Cheating is not a criminal offense. Beating the shit out of people is. Get yourself a divorce not your ex-wife (I'd assume by now) broken bones.
2 likes@Evan Brackney People have killed others plenty of times for far less than cheating before. So you definitely should be allowed to defend yourself whatever it may take. Especially because I would assume there would be a physical power imbalance as he's a dude and she's a woman. She likely didn't have any other option to defend herself other than a weapon.
1 likeWoah? Lawyers can do bad things?!
0 likes@norbrook36 nice
0 likes@yuun paan this hypothetical and speaks volumes about your world perception as well as racial profiling. Were this a white woman shoving him, an obese mother perhaps, she would have the same capability but I doubt he'd shoot her. Studying forensic psyche, we have to perceive all angles of actions and behaviors (especially hypothetical) and figure out what was the turning point of escalation. Go back to school, bro. It's worth it.
0 likesAnd that has relevance because.......
0 likes@TK tonedead it’s called I R O N Y
1 like@PotawatomiThunderNew Exactly mate
0 likesWhats his name
0 likes@Manly Man'yo that doesn’t justify killing someone
0 likesThat's so ironic and sad
0 likes@yuun paan don’t take my previous comment as me defending the guy. I was speaking generally. I think this guy was 100% in the wrong and I don’t think the situation called from him to even draw his gun, let alone fire it.
0 likes@PotawatomiThunderNew He 1000% was in the right to draw it. He was assaulted. Just shouldnt have fired till he was sure the attack was going to continue.
0 likesThis has been seen before. The person who is in the wrong, threatening someone, is confronted by someone who is trying to "save" or protect the other person, and then the initial threatener shoots the savior, saying he was the one who was being attacked. Wow.
4 likes"Negative"
1 like"Force Multiplier"
"Neutralize the immediate threat"
What are you, Buzz Lightyear?
Why this guy felt the need to enforce parking over someone pulling into a handicap for a min or two idk. Not that serious & a life didn’t need to be loss. In the heat of the moment emotions take control not your mind if that makes sense. So both ppl acted out of anger without any thought
4 likesTo assume a racial motive for an allegation of murder obviously amounts to a corruption of law enforcement proceedings. In reality there is absolutely no evidence of such a motive, according to the facts alone. To suggest otherwise is simply irrelevant; the psychologist who interviewed the defendant in prison, mentioning Al Sharpton hearing about the case, was clearly baiting therefore making a mockery of the US legal system.
1 likeBesides this, the law of technicalities in potentially life or death situations is just overboard. I see people here say fights always happen and it's hardly ever assumed it should turn into a fatality, but the problem with that is:
1) unsuspected assault against an unknown person is not your classical, mouth to fists altercation between friends or acquaintances, in your everyday conventional human social settings.
2) In an environment of generally high rates of violent crime, it is reasonable to believe no manner of aggressive based assault can be deemed "safe" or non-dangerous by any stretch of the imagination.
The wider issue here is why there is such high rates of violent crime in a society, altogether.
This definitely the kinda guy who has a hard on for cops but never got into police school
2884 likesReplies (11)
And thank God too 😣 I hate to think of all the people he'd be hurting
75 likesOr failed the Police Academy
25 likes@Simren 72 I mean he clearly doesn’t need the badge to kill it just helps to avoid any responsibility when they do 😂🙃
31 likes@Sarah F right, because criminals are generally innocent.
7 likesAnd it’s easy to get on the force lol
2 likesWell it seems
I thought this comment said he was hard for cops but i wouldnt put it past that guy
2 likesF12
2 likesLmao or he’s a failed boot
1 likei mean thats true but we are the ones watching this channel haha
0 likes@Piagebot that is what it says
0 likesImagine the shit he would do with the badge. He would be the most hated cop in the unit. Most corrupt as well, judging by his "wave the gun this is GTA" behavior.
0 likesSeemed like the moment he got pushed, he was thinking to himself "finally my moment has come" and shot that man to death.. sad really, what a snack stop at the gas station can turn into
1 likeWho the F has the right to shoot someone because their gf was parked in a handicapped spot. I hope this man gets what he deserves! No one gets to play God
3 likesReplies (1)
Who the F has the right to push someone because they were simply telling a woman not to park in the handicap spot?
0 likesThat prosecutor mixed the two men's names up like four times at the end there lol
2 likes20 years for manslaughter over a parking spot that you didn’t even need to use. Two major lessons here: don’t push people because you might get shot and killed. And don’t meddle in petty trivial matters that don’t concern you because you might serve 20 years of your life for absolutely no good reason. Stupid and avoidable.
13 likesReplies (2)
Or don't have a gun if you can't fight and yt people need to mind their business and worry about themselves.
3 likesA stranger was yelling at the mother of the victim’s children. I’d be sure that in a similar situation you’d have done the same as him
0 likesEven if you’re innocent ask for an attorney. I can’t understand why anyone questioned by the police wouldn’t request legal council.
502 likesReplies (29)
I think they’ve explained that in some other videos, because yeah that kind of confuses me too. It comes from a guilty suspect trying to act innocent, because they feel requesting legal council will make them appear more guilty. So I actually think an innocent suspect might be more likely to request immediate legal council than a guilty one.
35 likesI swear I’m not grammar police, but the word is counsel, meaning advice :) A council is a large assembly of officials and it made me crack up, thinking of the guy requesting a whole panel of city representatives 😂😂😂 I was like, well that’s going a bit overboard hahaha. GODDAMIT OFFICER I WANT THE CITY MAYOR IN HERE AND THE WHOLE DAMN COMMITTEE, STAT, I KNOW MY RIGHTS
54 likes@Cure4Living lmao, tru
7 likesA lot of citizens just simply don’t know/understand what the right to legal council means.
8 likesHope. That they would be freed. That's it.
2 likesIgnorance, and occasionally being told they don't need one, or that they just want to talk.
9 likesDavid Davis makes them seem guilty. It’s the cops way of manipulating the situation for sure. They don’t want him asking for legal council they wanna act like his friend
10 likesThe arogence of a dim witted murderer will condemn themselves
8 likesSometimes they do, the police will say something like "yea we'll get a lawyer for you" and just keep talking to them and the suspect talks anyway. I'm not sure if that's entirely legal, but I've seen it so many times. Just saying "lawyer" doesn't make the interrogator throw up their hands and walk away. A lot of the time these people are either too trusting, too naive or too full of themselves to stay quiet.
6 likesIf you request council I think they’ll hold you until you can get in touch with your attorney or you can clear a public defender qualification. Who knows how long that takes state to state? I think most people would rather just answer the questions and hopefully be let out until their court date
2 likesRoodski true. They will just hold you until when and if bail is posted. But the way everything someone says is analyzed it would be the safest bet. When you’re swimming with sharks it’s safer to be in a cage.
2 likesSparrow Cunningham it’s totally legal because the suspect is giving up information voluntarily. If he said I want a lawyer and shut ups afterwards but the cops try to force him to speak then it becomes legally questionable.
2 likesElena B. Haha no problem. Your reply was so funny that I’ll leave my comment unedited so the comedy is retained.
3 likesBecause Drejka felt that he had every right in the world to kill the guy and he expected the cops to be on his side.
4 likesThis so true they all snitch on themselves. One of Jim's previos videos had a snipped of people who knew their rights and even a crackhead told the police they don't know anything when he was accused and asked to leave, he got them to give him a coke before the interview haha
0 likesA Beverage thank you for being such a good sport. Very few people can handle being correct with the grace you showed.
0 likesElena B. Brilliant comment!
0 likesBc he's the type that think he's smarter than everyone else.
0 likes@Ellie #Putin&HisBishTrump 🍆 TinyPeePees My Favorite Console is the Super Nintendo
0 likesA self righteous feeling of doing no wrong, for some people asking for a lawyer admits guilt with reasoning like "why would I need a lawyer if I'm innocent?" A very naive thing when the cops who at first seem like your friends don't give a shit about anything but hoping to find you guilty in any way possible. They aren't there to help you no matter how "friendly" they seem, people don't seem to understand this.
1 likeJCS already showed at least one case explaining why the lawyer up thing is not always the best thing to do. I think one of the reasons is pretty clear: guilty people don't wanna look guilty. I'm pretty sure that also happens when innocent people are questioned, although I think those tend to exercise their right for legal counsel more often, especially if they think cops are trying to frame them for whatever reason. But here's the thing I don't understand: I see comments like this in a lot of JCS videos, and I don't understand why, since showing and explaining investigator's techniques designed to, among other things, prevent a suspect from asking for a lawyer is one of the main focus of every single video in this channel.
0 likesSparrow Cunningham Exactly 👌🏼👌🏼
0 likesHe might have been able to avoid prison if he'd shut up and asked for a lawyer
2 likesHOW would a lawyer help in this case? With the cops had the video of the shooting? ... When he fired that shot, that dumbass pretty much burned that "pleading the fifth" bridge.
0 likesLet's say that he claimed "i shot him in self-defense", then lawyered up right away, and say not one word to the cops.
With any reasonble jury, what do you think the verdict would be?
@Sparrow Cunningham yep this is entirely legal, you should just answer any questions with 'no comment' until legal representation arrives.
1 like@Xiaomin L Feador A lawyers job is infinitely easier if you haven't just ratted on yourself to the cops, honestly I think this being Florida a good lawyer could have got him off even with the CCTV footage.
0 likes@kindgrinds Please explain to me, how would a lawyer explain away with CCTV footage, it shows that he shot the guy when that guy was down on the ground.
0 likesThis!!!! Regardless if you did a crime or not, always consult with a lawyer before giving a statement!
0 likes@Appie Bear
0 likesTIPICAL CRIMINAL MENTALITY!
He doesn't cry during interview about taking the life of a man who was a son, husband, father, brother etc with zero remorse. It was 100% bigotry. If a white young woman had parked there and the same incident took place I guarantee 💯 he wouldn't have pulled his weapon nor even reacted in such disbelief
1 likeMy second job is working for a call center for an outdoor retailer that sells firearms. Most of the customers I encounter are this man. They don't all kill, but they are horrendously racist. They demand "respect" but give none. They will try to guilt the hell out of you to get their way. I knew guns were a problem in America, but I did not see it for what it is until I had this job. These people are allowed to walk around with weapons with no training whatever and it is absolutely terrifying. I'm a moderate Republican and I do believe that people have a right to have firearms, but I believe it needs to heavily regulated and that people need to jump through hoops to get one. People would not believe the unspeakable things I hear and see every day.
0 likesLife Protip: Whenever you see someone parked in a handicap parking spot that they shouldn't be in, think to yourself "wow, what a c***" and keep on with your day like everyone else.
0 likesthe fact that he shot while his victim was backing up too. then to lie about it and say he had been taking steps toward him
1 likeThe one thing I've learnt from these videos is if the police take you to a room and start asking you questions, say absolutely nothing until you've spoken to a lawyer, even if you're innocent.
589 likesReplies (14)
Don't get me wrong, I'm very happy when criminals talk to the police and are arrogant enough to not shut their mouths, because it means more evidence for the police. However, ANY lawyer worth their salt will always, in any circumstance tell you to never talk to the police. Especially as an innocent person, you do not know how your words can be twisted to make it seems like you are guilty.
92 likesEspecially if you're innocent. You could easily talk yourself into prison.
60 likes@Miss Mcphee Yep. The police's job is to prove you're guilty, not to prove you're innocent.
44 likesRemember folks...police can legally lie to you.
43 likesYou have the right to remain silent. USE IT.
Yup. No matter how much they weasel up to you and pretend to be objective.
5 likesYeah If you look at interrogation/interviews in the UK 99% people just say "No Comment" to EVERY question.
9 likesYup. Virtually all of these people would get away with it if they didnt self incriminate
4 likes@Chris Bwee I thought the judge does that.
0 likesIt's not wise to say absolutely nothing because that leaves the person's intent unknown, therefore open to speculation by the courts. As silly as it might sound, what lawyers advise is to announce your intention to remain silent before remaining silent -- because then there's no room for interpretation. Even though that announcement isn't literally remaining silent. The 5th amendment is about abstaining from self-incrimination, not about trying to be #1 at the quiet game.
2 likes@Alan Falleur thats not true whatsoever. Silence is not an admission of guilt. “Beyond REASONABLE doubt” to get convicted. Cant do that without an admission of guilt or hard evidence. Silence means absolutely nothing.
6 likesYou are absolutely right, everyone should watch the video called "Don't ever talk to the police" here on YouTube
2 likes@Ron Fowler 11+
0 likesI'd say especially if you're innocent, dont talk to the police. Their tactics really dont differentiate between guilty and innocent people, they're looking for a confession whether it's the truth or not.
3 likesHow about, I don’t answer questions !
1 likeThe fact that he able to laugh when he kill a man is shocking
2 likesRegardless of what anybody thinks about this guy, the lesson in this is that there are people out there that will kill you. Always avoid confrontation and de-escalate, it's not about who's right or wrong, it's about getting home safe.
5718 likesReplies (203)
I knew a father who was shot and killed because he argued with a neighbor over trash. TRASH. Just swallow your pride and walk away people... You can be right or dead right.
483 likes@Fred Holtzclaw Wow...all over some trash.. 2 lives lost, the guy who's dead and the guy who pulled the trigger.
126 likesMan Hit the nail on the head i learned this valuable life lesson and realized its not worth loosing your life over pride. Ill be more than happy to take a walk if confronted but if u cross that line you will pay the fine.
78 likesGood point...
1 likeListen to the song Dead and Gone by T.I. It's all about him learning this same lesson
14 likesExactly what I always tell my husband
8 likes@Think Tank Nobody is saying it was wrong, but acting as the handicap parking police is just begging for a confrontation like this... is it worth 20 years of your life?
127 likes@Fred Holtzclaw I know another crazy one
27 likesA person from my town was killed on the street over a cigarette.
Witnesses said that a weird dude approached him, asked him for a cigarette.. the guy didn't have one .. bam .. 5 stab wounds, 2 were lethal .. the ER that day was full of blood.. poor guy.
It’s about family values.
66 likesIf you come outside and there is an irate male outside your car with your partner and child in it, how much negotiation would you do?
And how much negotiation did the murderer’s body language suggest?
@predattak not going to lie I'm next to New York city. I carry enough smokes for that reason
10 likesNah it’s about whose right, cause in the end, I’m dying out of the right thing.
3 likesI guess this is an American thing? (Sorry if that's offensive) I've never heard of someone getting shot over an argument..
82 likesSounds good but it don’t work like that in the hood 🤷🏽♂️
6 likesThank you Peter griffin
2 likesIn a society with so many guns and no mental healthcare that is the truest thing you can say.
39 likes@tony lopez daaaamn wtf is wrong with people
8 likesThank you Peter Griffin
2 likesSays the guy who fought a chicken over an expired coupon...@Peter Griffin.
11 likesThat's sounds real good...Almost Disney like. Unfortunately life doesn't work that way. People just react to situations, often there's no thinking involved till afterwards. If a dude violated your women or kid in front of you for no reason.. Looked at you and said "What the f**k are you gonna do about it" You just gonna walk away and de-escalate? Some people's 1st thought might be to protect, and not "Are they gonna kill me? Lets de-escalate"
19 likesAmerica is hell. Goodness me the comments
27 likesThere’s so many Peter Griffins on YouTube
2 likesThat isn't how one gains entrance into Valhalla.
4 likesVery well said!
1 likeFrom an European perspektive its very disconcerting that every grown up American is allowed to wear a gun and that pacifism is considered a bad thing.
34 likes@jibba rich I wouldn't just straight up push him to the ground, but then again, I was raised to be a decent and lawfearing person. The automatic violence as a solution of conflict tells me that man wasn't.
32 likes@ZeuszO_O I mean I think responding to a /push/ with a life ending /gunshot/ is a bit extreme tbh, dunno about you...
38 likes@ZeuszO_O yikes, reminds me of the man who killed a father in front his wife and children tbhtbh
30 likes@Fred Holtzclaw That doesn't always work either bud. You can refine your sentance down to "Just stand there and hope for the best". Ever met a complete meathead that's as smart as pondslime? Or a level 69 karen? There is no walking away, there is no confrontation...there is only, "The storm" and whether, you can weather it...ha ha.
3 likesWould you people cop on and take all those guns out of your society. It has been proven, in countries where carrying weapons is illegal there are much less crimes involving firearms. Allowing any auld eejit carry a gun is a recipe for trouble.
18 likesExactly, never push someone like that, they could have many different ways of striking back at you that are more deadly then that push.
10 likes@Tony Lawlor Ah yes like the UK, where im from... and the criminals still get them, it's just the every day people that can't get them (though we are barely allowed to defend with our fists now). Or germany? When will YOU people learn it's being done to basically control you? Oh that's right "MUH FEELIN'S!" People like you dude end up creating other people that fear guns or worship ithem, 2 extremes with no balance "Bbut-but-but-but muh fee fees! Im scared of big meanie boom stick so ban it!"
17 likes@who dis? I’m not American and senseless deaths like these are common outside of the US. People just don’t know how to articulate their frustrations properly that many lives get lost for no reason.
4 likes@Ike Rice 😂😂😂
1 likeLesson keep ya tool
1 likeYou have summed it up its not worth too many idiots out there that cannot think problems out .
2 likesPeople shouldn't have the power to kill this easily in the first place.
17 likesIf there wasn't a camera he could have very well got away with cold blooded murder.
@Alex_Inside you can knock someone down and stomp on their head and kill them about as fast if you're bigger than them
10 likesno doubt that was what was prevented here
but life should not be run by fear.
2 likes@Think Tank don't be yelling at their wives and probably threatening them 😅
4 likesThanks Peter Griffin, some of us need to hear that.
0 likesThe guy still had 5 to 10 seconds to see that the father legit wasn't going to do anything after that push. He even raised his hands a little bit but this guy shot him.
22 likes@Hendrick Cavvendish I wouldn't call an approximately 10-word youtube comment my "narrative" but ok
1 like@Camillo apparently this guy had 4 previous engagements where he pulled a gun on somebody before so I think he just saw an opportunity to shoot somebody and thought he would be justified
12 likes@Bobby Flay Wow that really sucks
0 likesIn that case. This guy should be in prison. He had no reason to go up to the vehicle and start a confrontation. Which resulted in him being pushed.
7 likesThanks Peter ❤
0 likesYea really. After the push he had no option. If you push someone to the ground and they pull a gun on you then it’s going to be hard to justify any form of self defense legally
0 likes@staticoverlay yeah he will jut do a 10m backflip on his head. Sure...
0 likes@staticoverlay "you can knock someone down and stomp on their head and kill them about as fast if you're bigger than them"
6 likesThat comment makes it seem as if, you sound like someone who has watched too many action movies, and also has never been in a fight or think that people act like mannequins when they are getting beat up. lol
I'm just saying that the COMMENT makes it seem like you think like that.
@Kokujin Black in context of an old man getting shoved to the ground by someone twice his size it has more bearing on reality
6 likesThis observation should be on every video like this, as well as the observation that when you confront cops, remember that there's a gun in the mix, if you resist you're liable to get shot.
1 likeI can't believe how popular it's been this year to resist arrest. The cop might be in the wrong & might face punishment if you resist & he shoots you, it happens, but that's no consolation to the dead.
This world is too crazy to take any chances, people don't fight anymore, they'll just blow you away
Thanks for the advice Peter
0 likeswise words right there.
0 likesThe guy violently pushed him for arguing about his dumb wife who parked in the one handicapped spot in an EMPTY LOT
8 likesThink Tank
8 likesDefending himself!? Guy was backing up as soon as the pistol came out, he wasn’t a threat any longer. That was a fucking murder, plain and simple. Hope buddy enjoys jail. 👍
@Sean Matthew King my attitude about this is that two asshole bullies who left the house looking for a fight everyday both finally found one
11 likesI agree. Getting home safely is more important
0 likesYeah I catch myself getting hot headed and my gf always gets mad I gotta work on it
0 likes@Sean Matthew King I'm not the one replying ta EVERYONE XD try not to swallow your own tongue or anything man :(
0 likesReally going to come onto this video and talk about how it's the possible victim's fault? You're going to take the blame off a violent person's shoulder and sit it square with the person who's life is at risk.
1 like@Fred Holtzclaw This is why Fawning is such a popular response to conflict, that being said I think it's interesting that its easier to buy a gun than a bullet proof vest,at least in Ohio anyways. Imagine if more people had bullet proof vests,so many people would have a higher chance surviving shooter encounters.
1 like@Fred Holtzclaw you can't be beta whole life
0 likesIt's a shame he didnt apply his own standard of thinking to himself. Imagine having the gall to berate someone who was in a convenience store for 90 seconds and then shooting them because you were in way over your head
0 likesApologize profusely and give him the finger while you are at home safe. As police always teaches people about road rage, avoiding any contact, not even eye contact.
2 likesSadly that is true.
0 likes@Think Tank It's really weird to me to think that some people watch that video and come away with that perspective.
1 likeI'm not a violent person, never been in a fight. But I'm not sure how I would react if I stepped out of a store to see a strange man screaming at my wife. A shove doesn't seem completely unreasonable to me. But putting a bullet through a man's heart as he is fleeing...
You are so correct! I cannot believe all the road rage murders that I read about! I mean someone will actually blow a bullet thru someone's heart for cutting them off... They will take a life, and spend the rest of their life in jail! Someone cuts me off I try to be cool, someone rides my ass I pullover let them pass... I do not have many issues.
0 likes@who dis? Particularly in the south in the US. It's a cultural remanent of the wild west. You can read more about it, there's a short wiki article on it, "culture of honor"
3 likesthe world is dangerous
2 likesThere was another guy who was going to help the guy who got shot and he put his tail between his legs and got farther away.
3 likesAmericaaa, lol
0 likesI love this comment so much
0 likes@chickonspeed99 That's not true not in NYC!!!
0 likes@Isam El-hussein you seem like the kinda guy who'd shove over an old man in a parking lot and think you're tough
3 likesFacts cause I'm gone shoot immediately... "Sorry officer he sneezed I thought he was reaching.."
0 likes@who dis? yes, it’s an American thing. Wish it wasn’t though but I can’t change how loose the laws are.
0 likesThat is the sad reality of USA an their gun laws. We can argue here all day, in worst case there is a fist fight a nose broken, a few bruises no one is dead. Then again, I heard americans only feels safe if they armed to the teeth and they fight tooth and nail for the right to be, so I guess some of them at least deserves it. (to live and die like in a western movie)
1 likeBeside that, never forget, whoever initiate the violence in an argument is the one who ran out of arguments. With other words if you can't justify your position with your words going violent won't justify it for you either.
I don't understand how people can act in such a dangerous way. Some ass hat tried to run me off the road once when I was on my bike just because I kept over taking him.
0 likesWell said.
0 likesTrue. I used to aggressively drive in my twenties and pissed off a lot of people. I know realize I could have been killed by someone who was having a bad day. I now walk less aggressively and try no piss off anyone.
0 likesWell said
0 likes@FIGGA then get outta the hood my friend
0 likes@ᴏғғɪᴄɪᴀʟᴋɪɴɢᴢ that’s why the reminder is good. That it’s not worth. Life may not be that way for you, but it makes me think twice before getting into a confrontation with people you don’t know
0 likesexactly... there was no physical altercation going on, the shooter was standing still arguing(which i can understand as it kinda annoys me too when people park on specially marked spots expecially when there are ton of other spots available), the kid was safe inside the car... the wife should been safe inside the car but then decided to get out of the car which could be seen as confrontational and then this guy comes and forcefully pushes the guy on the ground... not saying he deserved to get shot from it... but without that push if they would have just went back into the car and left... he would still be alive... you never know what other people are like so you should not needlessly start or escalate arguments with people... and never EVER turn things physical as you dont know how people will respond...
2 likesThat man was protecting his family, he had every right to do so
1 like@ZeuszO_O society better hope you’re not a coward like the guy in the video then.
0 likesExactly!
0 likesTHIS. People in the USA in particular feel entitled to deadly force at some indignities that are easily dealt with by other means. I was in the Nextdoor app the other day and some “cowboy” started bragging about pumping people who touch his grass with lead, he kept going on and on about his right and he was twisting castle law, stand your ground and hot pursuit.
1 likeOver and over this misunderstanding of exculpatory law caveats poses a MAJOR threat to the general populace.
People twisting the law to suit their bias and preference.
A total inability to deescalate or LEAVE stuns and chagrins me over and over.
@Jason Hendrick I’m not but what I’m saying is if someone shoved me onto the ground and keeps yelling at me and starts walking back towards me I’m not gonna just let him beat my ass. I’m not saying over an argument I’m saying if I was just waking down the street and someone just did it for no reason.
1 like@kate carew some “cowboy”? Oh god I’m dying inside
1 like@ZeuszO_O no, he’s literally trying to pass himself off as a cowboy. He’s all up in people’s DMs rattling on about rustling up coyotes and varmints.
0 likesEXACTLY. I was raised by a sociopath (diagnosed) and there's an epidemic of guys trying to puff up to preserve their "manhood". Let me tell you right now. That dude never fought fair and you can't defend yourself against crazy. And you never know. You NEVER KNOW when the person you're getting froggy with is crazy. Take it easy out there guys and stay safe.
0 likesya he screwed up when he fired, but for sure he was going to get curb stomped if he didnt have a gun
2 likes@Think Tank when you are engaging a woman and her children you better be looking over your shoulder. Dreika deserves whatever comes his way.
0 likesthanks peter griffin
0 likesBingo. Never know how crazy someone is or what they're packing. My main objective would be to just get out of the situation and live to see another day.
1 like"Okay Handicap Parking spot police, you win." And leave it at that.
@Isam El-hussein don’t push people if you aren’t ready for any consequences. This is America where people have guns, even the criminals. This should have been on his mind.
5 likesThat's what you get when you find guns like candies in your country.
0 likesHe’s an American with a gun
0 likes@ZeuszO_O i don't think anyone else with a brain would shoot someone for pushing them down
0 likes@who dis? I was thinking the same thing. I live in a very violent country and getting shot it's not a normal social outcome XD. The normal extreme is usually a fist fight. I think what the victim did is still dumb but it didn't HAVE to end like that. So people... please don't normalize murder 🤦
0 likesPeter Griffin That is perhaps the wisest take on this horrible incident.
0 likesDefinitely, remember tough guys, you have no idea what the other is carrying.
3 likesI bet if the father knew the guy was carrying a gun, he wouldn’t have pushed him.
Remember, you don’t know what they are carrying, they could be some psycho that is armed or a coward with nothing arm him. It isn’t right, but it isn’t worth losing your life over.
The man who got shot didn't even need to touch the guy! This is America! All he had to do was approach looking upset / angry and shout get the fuck away from my wife - guy could've pulled his gun, shot and said "I felt threatened!" People shoot u in America for nothing.
1 like@Jdb
1 likeI turn my head to the East
I don't see nobody by my side
I turn my head to the West
Still nobody in sight
So I turn my head to the North
Swallow that pill that they call pride
The old me is dead and gone
But the new me will be alright
Well shit I didn't know this song had that meaning on it
@Enden Verted Yeah man it has really powerful lyrics
0 likesAmen brotha
0 likes@Tony Lawlor yeah you know what crimes in those country's have other killing methods, stabbing, bludgeoning, ect.
1 like@Alex_Inside so take away the kitchen knives, hammers, and axes. Cars because of hit and runs.
0 likes@Killian B what makes it difficult in Ohio ? Just curious
0 likes@D Culican where do you live ?
0 likes@Clown From Clown Town move to the uk
0 likes@CraftyF0X in gun free country's people are stabbed in the streets and bludgeoned to death run over with vehicles. They are not just given broken noses.
0 likes@TheDamped Wikipedia right.....
0 likes@kate carew it's not just about defending your self it's also defense against government taking over. Look at the communist country's where the government rules with an iron fist and citizens can do nothing but oblige or die
0 likes@Dopamine Wikipedia is almost always fine for a birds-eye-view of noncontroversial topics. If there's a concern, you can always check the sources.
0 likesThis comment is from a UK perspective; In the States there's a misconception I believe that a permit to own a firearm is a permit to murder in the mind of a sociopath, probably internationally but certainly Stateside because of the violent history and legislation or 'legitimacy' of permitted ownership of the 'right'.......
0 likes@Moose Cannibal yes Moose, nailed it /\
0 likes"Beta" HAHAHAHAHAAHA
0 likesSorry I just find it funny whenever someone tries to apply wolfpack theory to the human race.
You do realise you're a human being right?, and you have the intelligence and emotional capacity to make decisions based off of THOUGHT and rational thinking, instead of some stupid "primal instinct" bullshit.
It's a toxic mentality and it breeds toxic behaviour, there's a reason people get made fun of for thinking like that.
@D Culican I'm trying to figure out what point you're making.
0 likesYou sound like you're saying something that affects what I said, but I know america has guns and that people get shot, that doesn't change anything??
Like... I'd be upset about the comment if it actually SAID anything, but you're just saying something that everyone knows like it changes something.
Genuinely not mad, just confused as heck as to what you're trying to say with that.
@D Culican Like legit, give me an explanation as to how what you said affects or changes what I said, 'cuz I'm not going backwards through the 190-something comments to find out that what your saying still doesn't make sense as an argument.
0 likes@Dopamine what do all those things have in common? They are tools used for cutting, transportation and general construction work.
0 likesA gun has one purpose and one purpose alone and it is to inflict as much damage to a human as possible over as long of a distance possible. You can't cut, screw, open or hammer with it anything.
I'm not arguing about your little gun rights which are stupid but work 99% of the time... The 1% of the time where they don't work, well kids in schools die and people on the streets die by the tens.
@staticoverlay maybe maybe not, pulling the gun isn't the issue but using it was. He killed that man without a reason to.
1 like@Alex_Inside one asshole is dead another is in prison nothing but a win from my perspective
1 like@Dopamine You do realize that you have to a be a "tiny bit more motivated " to bludgeon someone to death than just pulling a trigger. That is what NRA ppl seems to never grasp, the intent of killing can be there sure, but making it difficult instead of convinient might makes a huge difference. That is the main argument against automatic and semi-automatic rifles and high capacity mags. The damage what you can do in relation with the effort it takes to do it. Sure if you really want to kill you can kill without guns, but at least it is much harder, which means your victim may got a chance to survive or at least you can't just murder a crowd alone. Case in point, if the guy had a baseball bat in this instance he pulls out, the other guy backs off, situation deescalated. But he had a gun, so he pulls it off, other guy steps back, but since it is just the twich of a finger, and he is really mad, he shot the other one dead. The problem here as I see is that killing the other guy was just waaay too easy and convinient, and so in the heat of the moment he ended both of their life. I actually belive that he wasn't intended to kill the guy, but I also think he was like "Im gonna sting back to this madafaka" and since it was very simple and easy to strike back with deadly force that what happened.
2 likes@Think Tank no fuck no he yelling at his girlfriend with his kids inside the car he was protecting his family from some maniac. Plus the killer had time to sit up look at him and pull out his weapon while looking at him; if he was going to stomp him out he would have got on top of him immediately after pushing him down, but no he stop so don’t give me that shit about the killer being the victim.
2 likes@who dis? you right if this was the UK it would have ended right there, but unfortunately Americans have such quick access to weapons most arguments end in murder.
3 likes@ZeuszO_O so what the father was suppose to let him yell at his wife because this bully has a gun and is quick to shot anyone that dares stand up to him. Try this in shit in another country shit try this in the UK watch how fast you get folded. Because you don’t have easy access to a weapon.
0 likes@Oliver Ludwig that because you live in Switzerland, your citizens are not retarded.
0 likesThe lesson to be learned from this is that there is no place for firearms in the public. Some Americans seem to get so indoctrinated into this culture that they can't see the forest for the trees. It's very similar to an indoctrinated Christian or Muslim in that they cannot understand the most basic arguments against what they believe to be true or right.
2 likesWell, in my country its illegal to carry firearms to the store lmao
0 likesThe fact that this dude thought he was in the right- Escalating the situation is always considered legally wrong- He was presented with non-lethal harm, and in return, escalated the situation and returned with lethal harm. That makes self defense a non-excuse.
1 like@who dis? i was reading comments for this comment!
0 likesAnd the fact that it’s that way is horridly depressing.
0 likes@Tony Lawlor but those countries with no guns as you say, has high violence of knife attacks and other hand held weapons. Violence just gets up and close.
2 likes@who dis? do we gotta go bring up the countless cases from outside of the United States where petty arguments lead to death or serious injury?
1 likeJust uninvest yourself, don't invest your ego into anything at all. Never comes out in your favor.
0 likes@Fred Holtzclaw yeah we say that then laugh at people who walk away. Or call a family member a puss for not stepping up. Human psychology runs deeper than that. Even tho he was killed it was primal instinct as a man to protect his girl and his children. The man that shot him should of left them alone.
0 likes@True Sheamus We have no mental Healthcare? Then who the fuck is my wife paying $500 a session to every month? That lying....
0 likesAmen
0 likesThe best fight is the fight never fought.
1 likeIts stuff we don't have to think about for the most part as a rule guns are out of the equation
1 likeThis is quite the thread you've created.
0 likes@tony lopez Good point on that also. I'd rather die like a man then live like a coward.
0 likes@Ike Rice 😂😂😂😂😂👍🏽👍🏽
0 likes@ZeuszO_O So who's side are you on?
0 likesIt's about not living in a fucking country with guns hahaha
0 likesWell said
0 likes@who dis? There are a huge amount of people in the U.S. who carry weapons who are itching to use them regardless of the situation. Our culture promotes violence in every “hero” movie, and underneath it all is a screwed up concept of what it means to “be a man”: bravado, confrontation, standing one’s ground. Supported by the NRA and politicians cuz, you know, there’s money in guns, war, civilians killing each other. One of the sickest aspects of our society.
1 like@True Sheamus And no anger management.
0 likes@chickonspeed99 From this American’s point of view I feel the same way.
0 likes@predattak tbh the victim didnt even have a chance in this one
0 likes@chickonspeed99 ugh, you better read up on American gun laws. Your statement is so false.
0 likes@ZeuszO_O lol no? He was backing away and the weasel still shot him, an unarmed man.
0 likes@Tony Lawlor i wish but guns have been a part of america for a while... might as well be a deep part of our culture, really. gun control is the best we can do and even some people are STILL against that
0 likes@CraftyF0X well said.
0 likes@Moose Cannibal yeah, ok...remember that next time someone threatens your life. It's not ok to put your hands on people! And if you do, know that they have every right to fight back.
2 likes@pollitorsiones you ought to brush up on American gun laws because your comment is completely untrue. 🙄
0 likesThank you. Been looking for this comment
0 likes@James Brannigan as a women who doesn't want to be preyed upon while I'm out by myself, I have to disagree. I take great comfort in knowing I can protect myself if I need to.
0 likes@ᴏғғɪᴄɪᴀʟᴋɪɴɢᴢ violate? That's a seriously heavy term for a couple people verbally arguing.
0 likes...yep. Lessons Learned here:
3 likes1) don't park in Handicapped parking spaces unless approved to do so
2) don't shove people to the ground when a simple discussion would suffice
These 2 simple things would have saved 2 men's lives. So sad it came to this.
@Moose Cannibal keep thinking people are playing with you or everyone have the same ideology/philosophies as you and you won’t like what comes with it. You can’t shove someone to the ground and the excuse is “he was protecting his family from a man arguing with his wife”.
0 likes@Kirsty Ackah lol the comments aren’t only Americans though
0 likes@mortalkombatxvids I know (??) And I still said what I said
0 likesNice job victim blaming the man who was murdered in front of his children. "Always avoid confrontation" a strange man was harassing his family????
0 likes@The Blue Rock yikes this is old, can you guys stop thinking this is relevant still?, I'm tired of seeing you guys go off about a conversation that hasn't been active in ages.
0 likes@Moose Cannibal so go on about your business/day. I’ll continue commenting because I can.
0 likes@The Blue Rock I'm a bit confused as to why you're asking about my day, not gonna share that, but yeah. I'm done commenting here, thanks for not continuing whatever debacle I got myself into.
0 likes@mortalkombatxvids The best line of action is not to startle the idiot with the gun bc even a single syllable could've startled him. You're trying to say that the dad should've risked his life trying to reason with the guy instead?
0 likesYeah. Maybe don't start physical aggression in an argument and you won't risk getting shot. Keep it verbal all the time like a proper human being would do.
0 likesWtf, i don't want to be paranoid everywhere i go, i'd rather fix the system that allows and respects lunatics who start confrontations just to fucking claim self defense by killing someone who pushed you away
0 likesThat's so sad. Fortunately it doesn't happen a lot in my country. The US sounds absolutely terrifying 😔
0 likes@Blue Team in the UK it's completely illegal to defend yourself even with your fists for example if you have any martial arts training and fight back against an attacker the court will class your training as a "deadly weapon" and you'll do time. The only legal way to react is to call the police who won't turn up because they are too busy "patrolling" twitter for "mean comments"
0 likes@Kokujin Black why is that like an action move? It's happened loads of times in UK people killed on a night out in a fight over somthing petty. Someone gets knocked down and kicked in the head once or twice next thing they're dead or severe brain damage and the other blokes facing a lengthy prison sentence. Usually the person never intended to kill its almost always just a petty fight.
0 likesIn real life most people will guard their head with their arms and curl into a ball because its a natural reflex when getting attacked on the ground. You dont see that kind of behavior much in movies. Its really hard to actually kill someone on accident, but then we would have to play semantics with the word accident when two individuals willingly engage in hand to hand combat.
0 likes@Kokujin Black it depends, as I've said it's happened a few times usually young lads drinking get into a fight no one is trying to kill but one ends up dead. Get punched and hit your head on the ground is all it can take.
0 likesSo true!
0 likes@Ross Outdoors true
0 likes@bobby ray of the family smith Where are these fights taking place at? I don't really understand in what situation do lads go out and drink with the intention of starting a fight or waiting for the chance to get in a fight. These lads going out for the night and getting in a fight sounds like something you see in a movie.
0 likesBut shoving a guy over because he is arguing with their wife makes the response somewhat justified
1 like@Moose Cannibal if he fell a bit different and landed badly he would have been in a worse condition than a bruised back. So yeah, if he believed that he was going to be a threat to my life then I'd see it as fair
0 likes@Moose Cannibal it's threat against your life. That guy didn't push him over then back off, he stayed standing over him. That's how those things are normally viewed
0 likes@NINO SKILLZ guess you lose your guns then
0 likes@jibba rich Right answer: SOME. "What's going on? Oh, we are? OK, we should move then." That man would be alive if he knew how to use his words.
0 likesAlso, I didn't see any threatening body language from Drejka. I think walking up and knocking the guy down is threatening body language.
Where, in this situation, was violence introduced? At what point? We both know the answer.
@Goop Guy lmaaaaaao nice one, you nearly had me waste my time arguing on the internet again.
0 likesI honestly was ready to be on his side. Hate self entitled people...world is full of them. And to always resort to physical violence is never a good thing so yes, I thought this was justified. Until I heard that he literally had been involved in similar incidents a few times prior to this deadly confrontation. It’s like he was WANTING to confront someone and hopefully be assaulted so that he could pull that gun out and execute a person. So many wrongs on this one. All should be held accountable...the mom included. What an example she is setting for her children to not only show no regard to the disabled in our country...but to then throw an attitude when someone confronts her on her ride, self entitled behavior. All were in the wrong. Unfortunately, one paid the ultimate price. Is it so damn hard to just be a GOOD PERSON????? Last I looked...it’s FREE EVEN. People act like showing good manners and kindness cost dollars. Sad society.
0 likes@DeeDee Dee Couldn't agree more👍
0 likes@Moose Cannibal cool
0 likesThis guy was looking for trouble! He wanted any reason to use that gun and he was gonna find a reason no matter what.
0 likes@Latios Tech Yeah and who the fuck puts the handicap spot at the end of the parking lot. Almost every spot up front was open.
0 likesThat's my strategy in life tbh.
0 likes@jibba rich sorry but if my family is in a car and are dumb enough to stick around they are on there own -_-
0 likesMaybe if people weren't such violent messes then we wouldn't have fulcing homicides like this. (As in violent I mean fatal harming, aka gun shots, not little pushes)
0 likesfuck, those words are really going to stick with me. They are so terrifyingly true, there are some crazy scumbags out there
0 likesExactly, and that starts by NOT laying hands on people you don't know. That's a basic concept in civilized society.
0 likesYep. Just witness a fight the other day, and one dude grabbed a bat. But thank god the other person de-escalated it at that point.
0 likesHe didn’t have to go up to the car. He didn’t have to pull out his gun. He started the confrontation he killed. Now he can take that 20 plus years for the rest of his life. On his knees with black eyes too
0 likesthe guy tried to de-escalate but he got shot.
0 likes@CraftyF0X the dark guy pushed him to the floor
0 likesRemember everyone, it's best to live life constantly in fear of losing your life over banal conversations than to advocate for gun control!
0 likesAnd there are countries, like mine for example, where there would have been a fight, a little blood flowing from the nose, some insults and that's it..... No gun.
0 likes@Fred Holtzclaw exactly, everyone should think like this.
0 likesImagine wanting to be a cop so bad that you feel the need to enforce parking at a gas station.
4092 likesReplies (151)
How dare someone hold someone else accountable for their actions.
61 likesHe never enforced
9 likesLol. And the disabled parking signs were not legally installed by the town. Mr know it all was wrong regardless.
53 likes@Looking 4 Things " Police are entitled to operate on private property, such as a parking lot, based on statutory requirements for things like sufficient handicapped parking ..."
7 likesThe above applies in all 50 states.
First mistake: Illegally park in handicap stall
35 likesSecond mistake: Physically assault someone with a gun (How do you know if they have a gun? You don't).
"Imagine" Being locked up in prison like Michael, minding your business, then....
28 likesAn inmate stuffs a large metal object in his sock, and bashes Michael in the back of the head causeing 5 stitches to his cranium. And still looking forward to just 18 more years of this life! 🤣🤣🤣 I love happy endings!
@Trumpty The Clown the happy ending is that the guy who illegally parks in handicapped spots and then assaults disabled people who tell him that's a scumbag move is dead, that's the best part of all of this
14 likes@L X Nah, best part is Michael living a nightmare in prison being assaulted being the norm. Constant fear! They're already trying to take his life.
45 likes@Red Diver this is a very important point that few want to understand. He didn't shoot somebody out the window that was "innocent".
11 likes@PinkOld see my comment above.
0 likes@jaim haas
17 likes"... shoot somebody out the window that was "innocent".
What does that even mean?
@PinkOld non of this would have happened if the man didn't assault him for no reason.
14 likes@SuperSora No, none of this would have happened if Drejka hadn't decided that he was the appointed man-Karen.
52 likes@PinkOld the difference is that being a man Karen is legal while assaulting someone isn't.
18 likes@Red Diver You're not listening. The handicapped parking space was not legal. NOT LEGAL. Therefore the victim committed no crime. You are wrong.
26 likes@SuperSora If you're honestly taking the side of Drejka over the man he shot, you really need to get your moral compass recalibrated.
65 likes@PinkOld whatever you say bro, you go to Texas and start randomly shoving people and we'll see who's what gets recalibrated
11 likes@Looking 4 Things
5 likesAs stores can require masks and call cops on non compliance issues, so can handicapped stalls be enforced.
Sorry. Thanks for playing.
@Looking 4 Things
3 likesCasting aspersions about gender preference/sexual orientation of someone because they disagree with you on a subject.
Pathetic. Name calling is always the go to rhetorical move when one can no longer defend their POV.
LOL.
@Red Diver Man they just said it as a joke. They don't actually think you're drejka's bf lol
7 likes@Bob. The joke does not bother me. The pathetic rhetoric does.
5 likes@Looking 4 Things : I've read several articles on the case and every mention of the handicap space made it out to be legitimate. Also, the victim shoved the eventual shooter into the ground, which if he didn't get shot would've gotten him jail time.
4 likes@Poochie Collins It's astonishing how many men on this feed don't have the innate protective instincts to protect their families.
21 likes@Tyler Godby who are they to do so? Oh yeah nobody
1 likeDamn boot liquor
0 likes@L X and the one who shot him is doing hard time regretting that bad decision.
0 likesand worst . got a job as a parking meter attendant
1 like@Demagogue : please explain to me how parking in a handicap spot when not handicapped, and especially walking up and shoving someone to the ground with no warning for the crime of arguing (and would've gotten the guy a jail sentence) are "nothing wrong"?
4 likes@PinkOld what are you, a Canadian?!?! (I am, lol)
1 likeWhen I was in Ireland, a guy says to me, "how do you get 20 drunken canadians out of your swimming pool?"
...i dunno, how?
"Just ask one of them, 'hey man, do you guys mind getting out of my swimming pool?'"
I LOVE that that is OUR reputation across the pond
@Red Diver I'm sure your wife is thrilled to know that if you ever come out of a store and find some nosey stranger accosting her, that your first thoughts will be a)did my wife park illegally and b)"what if I step in and this guy's armed?!?!!?!? Better to let her deal with it alone..."
4 likesHahaha. When there is 8 open spots available
1 likeI don’t think you need to be a wannabe cop to get frustrated with someone who is illegally parked. I’m sure you get mad when you see someone parked in two or more parking spots.
3 likes@Tyler Godby "She was in a disabled parking spot, so I began harassing her, and her husband pushed me. Naturally I shot him and killed him. I was just holding her accountable!"
13 likesImagine walking up to someone and putting your hands on them just because they are arguing with your lady friend. The shooter was in wrong, his life was not in danger and he’s an idiot, but he probably would not have even pulled the gun out had the other man out his hands on him.
4 likes@L X what disabled person was assaulted? Are you saying that the shooter was disabled?
1 like@SuperSora non of it would have happened if the self appointed parking lot patrol would have minded his own business.
11 likes@Red Diver you missed something. That was not a legal handicap space designated by the city.
5 likes@Poochie Collins given a choice I think the man would have preferred jail time over dead
2 likes@Looking 4 Things that is exactly what I was thinking.
2 likes@TheMidnightCaptain You see someone yelling at your wife and two kids, they have a gun. What do you do? Stay out of it? Walk over and begin politely debating the man with the gun?
4 likes@Sheryl Ferraro
0 likesAs with fire codes applying to private properties, handicapped parking stalls that are required by law are legally enforced.
This was addressed in an earlier post.
@jaim haas I think you're referring to the Michael Dunn case. It's similar but Dunn shot and killed the victim through the car door. Same entitled attitude.
2 likes@Red Diver the guy had no legal authority to enforce anything. Jeesh
7 likes@Mont Gomery lol
0 likes@TheMidnightCaptain And it wouldn't have happened if Drejka hadn't approached the car with a mom and her babies as the self appointed disability police.
6 likes@Looking 4 Things great playlist on your channel...I would listen to 30 of 37 any day :)
0 likes@Sheryl Ferraro
3 likesDrejka wasn't enforcing anything. He was verbally harassing a woman illegally parked in a handicapped stall. The woman's husband physically attacked Drejka. Drejka then shot his attacker.
This is not a defense for Drejka.
@PinkOld
1 likeI don’t think apology was needed after he had been pushed. He should just have walked away.
@Red Diver I must be misunderstanding your overall point
1 like@Sheryl Ferraro As you do with the post I replied to.
0 likes@Red Diver oh great. Thanks so much for being succinct and clarifying.
4 likes@SuperSora it might get u arrested for murdering someone, too, obviously
0 likes@L X Are you saying the Shooter was handicapped?
0 likes@Looking 4 Things The Shooter would not have known it wasn't a legal Handicap Parking spot. He was functioning under the impression that it was. Legal or not, the idiot girl who parked there, didn't know if it was legal or not, either. Everybody in the scenario, in those moments, believed that it was. So, the EVENTUAL learning that it wasn't legal ( after the fact ) is irrelevant to the behaviors and actions of all these parties.
1 like@Looking 4 Things Shoving someone to the ground in those circumstances, is NOT protecting your family. It's a thuggish, stupid and cowardly move. How protected is his family now with a dead Father??!! :-)
1 like@Looking 4 Things Wouldn't people leaving water rings on tables at a party someone kindly invited them to, be an asshole? Obviously, if you didn't get basic common courtesy training in your family environment, it might be lucky if you had someone point out leaving water rings is not a nice thing to do.
1 like@Sheryl Ferraro He wasn't ENFORCING. He was pointing out that what they did was illegal.
1 like@Victoria Munoz my comment was somewhat sarcastic. Going into the store and notifying the manager Would have been much more appropriate. Even had he just said "hey, did you know this is handicap parking?" But that is not what he did.
0 likesI was parking once at a Best Buy. The car in front of me opened a door and dumped out a bunch of trash. I brought it up like hey, that is not cool. We have one planet together. People got really mad. Even though I then drove away and parked at another business I still came out to find a severely keyed driver side door. It's not worth it. If I saw someone abuse and am mal, a child, or any person I would intervene. Hopefully that would not be life threatening to me.
@Sheryl Ferraro He's an instigator Sheryl. He isn't interested in finding common ground. He looks for people to fight argue and disagree with. Don't bother using your common sense with him, it's a waste of time.
1 like@Looking 4 Things thanks for the tip!!
1 like@Victoria Munoz Nuff said. 🤦♀️
0 likes@Looking 4 Things
4 likesIt's astonishing how many men on this feed don't have the innate protective instincts to protect their families.So apparently you think men should agree that shoving someone who hasn't harmed you or yours is an appropriate action? You're confused: it's one thing to protect your family when there's an actual threat or harm occurring, but violently pushing someone who has not attacked you is something else entirely.
Just to be clear, I DON'T think Drejka was justified in shooting the man who pushed him either, and I do think the shooter should have been minding his business in the first place. But that is not ordinary behavior, to just run up on someone and shove them to the ground simply because they're arguing with your spouse. It's not only irrational and overly aggressive, it could be hazardous to your health.
@Mont Gomery
3 likesYou see someone yelling at your wife and two kids, they have a gun. What do you do?I mean, a normal person would probably try to find out what's going on before getting physical when no one else has put their hands on anyone. Also, I really don't think he saw that he had a gun, because if he did he wouldn't have pulled up on him like that.
As a few other people have said, there are no winners here and all three of these characters did something terrible. It's actually almost comical how every subsequent thing is just worse than the last:
1 like1. Parking in a handicap spot (which was believed at the time by all parties) is pretty shitty
2. Pushing a complete stranger to the ground when they haven't threatened or harmed you and when you aren't armed and you have no clue who they might be is indeed idiotic behavior, not to mention extra aggro. So that's worse than #1
3. Shooting someone who's just pushed you is not proportional unless they're actually further threatening you or you legit think your life's in danger and it's just stupid (from a legal standpoint) to shoot someone who's walking away and it's also pretty cowardly, esp. when you instigated the whole thing. And that's even worse than #2
@The Great Pumpkin don’t use logic on these people. They don’t take two seconds to think about the fact that he was attacked before he shot, regardless if it was a terrible shot to take.
5 likesNo, this wouldn't have happened if this violent high school dropout didn't attack the man. Same thing happens here in Baltimore. He had no business touching that man.
1 likeOther man should not have shot though. Once the guy backs up from you, call the police and have him arrested for assault.
@Sancho Panza
3 likesThere was actually a whole chain of events leading up to this. Part of that includes one person pestering another about where they were parked. I don't get people who are that intrusive and antagonistic. I mean I get that it's shitty but the guy who got pushed was LARPING as security/police, and look where it got him.
@The Great Pumpkin it gets tiring seeing people escalate to violence over words. There's nothing that can be said that justifies attacking someone over.
2 likesI made it clear the guy should not been shot, but until the shooter shot him, the shooter did nothing wrong.
@Sancho Panza
2 likesit gets tiring seeing people escalate to violence over words. There's nothing that can be said that justifies attacking someone over.At no point did I ever say the initial attack (the pushing) was justified. In fact I was very surprised when seeing this the first time and the guy just ran up and pushed Drejka to the ground. My only point was that Drejka did put himself in the position where things could have escalated (which they did) by accosting someone and basically being a male Karen, and he likely only did it because the weapon he was carrying clearly emboldened him to do so. Even one of the interrogators alluded to this at one point. I also made it clear I don't think he should have been pushed, but nonetheless Drejka ultimately inserted himself into that entire conflict.
Just like the guy who pushed him was incredibly reckless while acting out of proportion to the situation, the shooter reacted the same way when he shot the guy who wasn't even attacking him any longer. It seems we agree on that. But I'm also saying that Drejka acted without thinking or caring about the consequences before the push. Just like you don't run up and shove someone to the ground because you never know how they'll respond (among other things), you also probably shouldn't try to LARP as security because you never know how others will respond. Both men took a huge risk, albeit in different ways, and while I'm still not saying the physical attack was warranted, it was still a risk the shooter took and he evidently has a history of altercations like this. All because he's armed, entitled, and likely itching to shoot someone. Like I said, there are no winners here but Drejka inserted himself into someone else's life and it bit him because now he's in jail.
@Sancho Panza
2 likesI made it clear the guy should not been shot, but until the shooter shot him, the shooter did nothing wrong.This is where we disagree. How can you say the shooter did nothing wrong? It is not his job or responsibility to enforce parking restrictions. If it really bothered him his best course of action would have been to inform management inside the establishment or I suppose he could have reported it to police or something. But he took matters into his own hands for some reason. Like I said, while I personally don't think people should park in handicap spaces (which I think it came out later that this may not have even been the case), I also cannot understand what would drive a person to be so brazen and reckless as to confront another person over it. You have no idea what their situation is or who they are, or how they will respond. It's mostly just not worth the trouble.
@Sancho Panza The shooter had no qualifications to be approaching another vehicle for any such violation. If it upset the shooter for any reason the only action the shooter should have taken was to call 911 to report it The shooter shot a man for pushing him, after the victim witnessed him antagonizing his family which included 2 babies. What TF is wrong with you?!
2 likes@Looking 4 Things I think the problem is that they are missing a fundamental understanding of how the real world works honestly. It's like trying to explain that the sky is blue to a blind person, until they actually go out and experience things, they're not going to understand. Clearly, anybody with common sense would say that shoving somebody does not warrant getting shot and killed for it. Was shoving somebody a good or smart thing to do right off of the bat? Probably not. Also, we can't tell with the footage how loud the argument was, so the father was probably spooked with having a random man arguing with his wife with his children in the same car as well. It's also a ridiculous thing to be heated about in the first place, no matter what anybody says. But it obviously doesn't warrant getting killed over it. Anybody who disagrees either needs to go outside more or are intentionally being hard headed. (I feel like the people who argue about it are confused because they have to actually use their brain for something instead of having a perfect, clear cut answer in front of them)
0 likesMarkeis McGlockton was wrong to puch Michael Drejka, and Michael was SO wrong to shoot Markeis. Michael's life was not threatened, the guy didn't wanna kill Michael, he just wanted to get Micheal away from his girlfriend. Well, yes, the way that he did it was immature and irrational, but it didn't in any way justify Michael killing him. I will never understand the people justifying Michael's actions. I don't know if they realize that a man lost his life because this other man was stupid.
3 likes@Tyler Godby That's what we got 911 and police for. You wanna enforce the law, become a cop.
2 likes@Pardue The Holy Man Telling people 'hey you shouldn't be doing that' doesnt require a badge, just saying.
3 likesImagine being so petty and unthoughtful of the elderly that you park in a handicapped spot with multiple open spaces right next to you which could be taken by the time an elderly person comes along while you are parked there intentionally forcing them to park somewhere far away or in tight spots.
4 likesImagine being so violent and overprotective that you shove someone you don't know from behind just because you hear an altercation that you know nothing about and don't like it.
Yes, everyone involved made dumb decisions that could've stopped this tragedy from happening if they were just a bit more thoughtful and respectful.💯💯💯🤦♂️
@PinkOld Dont be such a spoiled brat that you think simply holding someone accountable and standing up for the elderly is wrong. If her disabled grandmother had to be forced into parking somewhere far away or in tight spaces that then caused her grandma to struggle or even suffer, then both the woman and her boyfriend would flip out that someone took a spot meant for people like her disabled grandmother and caused her grief, which is called being a hypocrite and petty.💯💯
2 likesIt is quite amazing to me the number of people going to astronomical lengths to justify this sorry excuse for a human being. Equating parking in a handicap spot (a pretty crappy thing to do tbf), & shoving a man harassing your wife who has your small child with her (a hasty, yet understandable response) to murdering someone for little to no reason is disgusting. I wonder if the victim's behavior would've been considered wrong & "thuggish" had he been a white man protecting his white wife & kids? To act like "illegal" parking & a shove is equivalent to whipping out your gun & murdering someone that didn't warrant that level of hostility is a very vile thing to do.
5 likesenforce? lol for what looking at the vehicle? fool
1 like@Tyler Godby Yeah, that's not what this is about. He was not an officer of the law, so he had no right to confront them about it.
2 likes@Red Diver Michael's first mistake: Confronting someone breaking the law.
1 likeMichael's second mistake: Expecting nothing to happen.
@Taylor Davison You don't need to be a cop to be like 'hey you shouldn't do that' to someone.
1 likeThere are plenty of people like that all around the world, unfortunatly. My dad has an handicap and owns the right to park in said spots. There are always people looking for the handicapped logo.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things ppl P
0 likes@Tyler Godby Fair enough, just so long as people don't take the law into their own hands when we have trained professionals for that very reason. I have no problem with people trying to call out illegal activity, hell, wish more people did.
1 likeForgot to put his lights on
0 likes@PinkOld Exactly. As a disabled person, I find that the Karens of all genders are far worse than those who aren't. I rather someone stand up for their spouse and children, but it's a damn shame it ended like it did in this situation.
3 likes@Megan Allen Perfectly stated. Thank you.
1 like@Japheth Grimm It really was terrible that it ended as it did.
1 likeI'm sure that the man who got shot would have done it differently if he had a second chance, but Michael Drejka made that impossible because he couldn't abide by the basic rules of self-defense.
@Japheth Grimm thanks. I'm glad to see another disabled person pointing out these people's bias
1 likeWhat blows my mind is how 3 things could have been done to have this never occurred: the couple don't park in handicap space. Michael minds his own business and ignores that that they are in handicap space. The victim sees Michael arguing with his girlfriend and doesn't shove him.
1 likeHe doesn’t want to be a cop…he wants to be a vigilante 😯
2 likes@Red Diver none of that is an offense warranting a death penalty though
0 likes@SuperSora how come he didn’t just call the police then? This guy isn’t the Batman you think he is roflcopter
0 likes@Tyler Godby there’s holding someone accountable for their actions (check out cart narcs) and then there’s murder. He pulled out his gun, the victim clearly backed away, the suspects ground was hell and yet he fired anyway. This was murder.
0 likes@TheDarkerKnight you have no legal obligation to call the police while a assault is in process.
0 likes@TheDarkerKnight
0 likesWhere did I say it did?
It’s not because he reacted unreasonably to being assaulted that he was in the wrong for holding the woman accountable for her actions. The way the woman parked in a handicapped spot, reacted to being called out and how her husband reacted to the situation shows their family’s self entitlement. They only think of themselves and couldn’t care less about others. Yes, this man was in the wrong for the way he unreasonably used deadly force, but had he acted reasonably, I guarantee this family would be the ones looking like the villains.
1 like@SuperSora except he wasn't randomly shoving people he heard this man loudly arguing with his wife for parking in a handicapped spot that wasn't even legally installed
0 likesI found it odd that no one brought up the fact that he had said he had just been at the WAWA down the road and obviously only pulled in as he was passing by because he saw someone parked in the disabled spot and he wanted to make sure they were actually disabled! He literally said that “IT HAPPENS EVERYDAY”. I can’t say that I he got the true charge of the situation. He clearly stopped to confront the person in the disabled spot knowing he could “defend” himself(which to him means “shoot to kill” and not “shoot in the foot/leg”) That entire situation was premeditated and it’s crazy they can’t ever try to charge these disgusting things correctly when they kill people and end someone’s life because here in Florida, they ALWAYS get off if they are white. I’m speaking as a 41 year old white female who has lived in Florida for 41 years and every year there’s someone who is more than clearly guilty yet somehow gets off!!! It’s maddening!
4 likes@Tyler Godby when they die because if it, yes.
0 likes@L X he’s not disabled, he didn’t need the spot.
0 likes@Rissa Romero Nah, we need a lot more vigilantes on the streets. What can go wrong 🤞
0 likesI didn’t realize parking in a handicap spot was a crime punishable by death I just thought you got a fine or something ?
2 likes@Tyler Godby that's one of the main things wrong with society today, people do what they want and if someone correctly corrects them they just go "mind your own business". That's why people put their feet on bus seats other people have to sit on, don't get up for elderly people or pregnant women, jump the queue, park in handicapped only parking spaces etc etc
0 likes@PinkOld The man who got shot couldn't abide by the basic rules of decent human behaviour and respect for each other. So couldn't his wife, obviously. I'm not at all defending the shooting, it was an extrem and terrible overreaction. But let's be real here. The man would have shoved some other dude to the ground sooner or later. Or attacked a police officer, because he was arguing with his wife (which would have continued to park in disabled parking spots), which would have also ended with him being shot. It then would have been yet another case of "racist blue man killed innocent black man for no reason". You can't just physically attack someone out of the blue. Even if your loved ones are in an argument. This is not how normal humans behave. Behave like trash, get handled like trash.
0 likes@TheDarkerKnight I never said that, but ok. I was saying that people who complain about people parking in handicapped spots aren’t wannabe cops.
0 likesIt's not that , it is the principal of the matter , some people just want to do wrong , if they didn't park on a disabled parking this wouldn't have happened , the wrong doings of a certain culture that don't care to brake the rules is causing friction amongst cultures that do obey the law and that piss them off .
1 like@Looking 4 Things no , it wouldn't have happened if the woman didn't park on a illegal parking , go to the root of the problem , don't start looking for the problem in the middle , some cultures are known for braking laws , that pisses off those that do care about law
0 likes@CHRISTO BOSMAN It wasn't an illegal parking space. It did not have legal signage approved by the town.
1 like@Looking 4 Things In the video I heard it was said , the only disabled parking
0 likes@CHRISTO BOSMAN for the fourth time, In another video the deputy sheriff on the scene said it wasn't a legal handicapped parking space.
0 likes@Poochie Collins You are WRONG. Swallow it like a man.
0 likes@Poochie Collins The jury, We find the defendant GUILTY!"
0 likesWow just wow!!!!😂😂😂😂
0 likesWhile illegaly parking yourself
0 likes@CHRISTO BOSMAN "Some cultures are known for breaking laws?" That is a racist statement and I'm calling you out on that. Do better.
0 likes@Ryan Hazel I know. Now she's packing a weapon. lol
0 likes@TheMidnightCaptain I grew up with five brothers if I was that mother and any of my five brothers were to see that bully harassing me, he wouldn't have the time to reach for his gun. Midnight Captain I'm safer with brothers thank you very much.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things you call it racist , I call it culture consios , their is a big difference between the two , look it up or go back to school
0 likes@CHRISTO BOSMAN Conscious is not spelled "consios" Perhaps you will take your own advice?
0 likes@Looking 4 Things thanks for telling me , you deserve a Noddy badge , English is my second language and I'm writing fast because I haven't got time to waist on you .
0 likes@CHRISTO BOSMAN I can appreciate that. By the way, it's "waste on you". not "waist" If you're going to tell me to go back to school you should be aware of your own shortcomings. Be well.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things I'm glad to see that you know now what the difference is between racist and culture conscious , you too , go well
0 likes@CHRISTO BOSMAN Well no I don't. No need to respond. I'm done. Be well
0 likes@Looking 4 Things Good luck in going back to school .
0 likesYeah really weird to get in a full fledge screaming match with a stranger for parking where they shouldn’t though it really had nothing to do with him. 😬🙄
0 likes@Sheryl Ferraro exactly the guy that got shot was just taking up for his gf who was getting screamed at by some stranger over a parking spot
1 like@Red Diver Nice way to blame the victim.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things As with fire codes, designated handicapped stalls are indeed, within the purview of city and township regulations.
0 likesDo your homework.
@rand0mn33ss As with many murders, the victims are often the more aggressive initiators of violence. As was the case here. This is not a defense for Drejka. But it is inaccurate to say that the victim was innocent.
0 likes@Tyler Godby I have never in my life checked the license plates in the handicapped spots. Who the hell does that? That's not holding somebody accountable, that is instigating.
0 likes@SuperSora Drejka's actions towards the family before he shot the father could have been considered harassment.
0 likesThe important thing to note is the series of escalation. The family had parked in a handicapped spot, Drejka harassed the family for it, the father assaulted Drejka, at this point Drejka would have been the victim and he could have even pressed charges for assault if he wanted to. The moment Drejka pulled out his firearm he was no longer the victim.
@Toomany Francis how does shooting his assailant change the fact that he was a victim of assault? Also what he did was in no way harassment, annoying maybe but still miles away from harassment.
0 likes@dearheart 3 Probably call the cops. Plus, it wasnt that much force, he literally had to fake being injured
0 likesExactly , When it's so much Other SERIOUS CRIMES being committed SMH Kids Being Raped , Beat , killed All Types Of Fucked Up Shit Smh
0 likesImagine telling people that’s my store because I go inside everyday.
1 like@Tyler Godby Ah yes how dare you hold them accountable only because you’re now bold enough from the presence of a gun at your side
0 likes@SuperSora actually he was harassing someone, which isn’t legal bud
0 likes@Tyler Godby He wasn't hired by the gas station and there were spots open much closer, it's not his place to hold anyone accountable. He was playing citizen tough guy over handicapped parking spots and took a father of 4 away from their family over that. This shit shouldn't even be a debate, it's pathetic that it is.
0 likes@L X these type of cases bring out the most pathetic people...
0 likes@Trumpty The Clown is that what happened to him?
0 likesBut it's his gas station
0 likes@Tyler Godby It's not up to Drejka to hold anyone accountable for anything. It was a situation that didn't concern him whatsoever.
0 likes@Red Diver
0 likesFirst mistake: Cosplaying as the handicap placard inspector
Second mistake: Thinking any kind of physical provocation give you the right to respond with deadly force
@L X Drejka wasn't disabled. Learn the basic facts of the case before commenting next time 👍
0 likes@SuperSora "non of this would have happened if the man didn't assault him for no reason."
0 likesHe was yelling at and threatening his wife while his small children were in the backseat. Try to pay attention.
@Herbert West I payed attention. It's not illegal to tell someone that is illegally parked that they are not allowed to park there. Maybe you should try and pay attention to the law.
0 likes@Herbert West
0 likesFirst mistake, illegally parking in handicap stall. Second mistake, physically assaulting someone that calls you out on it (that turns out to be a gun carrying nutcase).
exactly correct @Shotty
0 likes@Trumpty The Clown To be fair I think the guy was very dumb and careless but not malicious. I think he deserves some punishment but maybe not what he's going through rn...
0 likesFor anyone new here:
2104 likesMichael Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison on October 10, 2019. He was also seriously beaten in prison in february 2020.
He has no possibility of parole and he will be out when he is 67 years old.
Replies (100)
That’s a shame. He’ll never see his dogs again 😢
65 likeswell.... he got that beating he thought he was gonna get from a retreating subject. XD
175 likesThank you for sharing.
19 likes@WHITEB0NE someone else will take good care of the dogs, not a lunatic anymore
42 likes@Vilimir 40 years for this would be a medieval sentence. 20 years no parole is a pretty hardcore sentence given it wasn’t planned it was just a dumb gun nut itching to use what he’s learned in gun club. The fact he’s been severely beaten, again, medieval.
94 likesI mean, what’s the point in a massive sentence? He’s very unlikely to do it again. The US justice system snd it’s rapey/gang prisons seems very spiteful rather than rehabilitative.
@rafer Jefferson iii I think they could banish him to the neighboring village. Like in early middle ages. Mayby to yours my dear friend with stone age
38 likesmoral system.
@rafer Jefferson iii I mean He took someone’s life, he could have a good 30 years of life left at 67, kind of seems fair to have him rot for what’s left of his
51 likes@rafer Jefferson iii Three kids, have no father. and watched him get shot and killed.... He had a history of starting conflicts, WITH a firearm included. He had no remorse about the a life lost, AND at his hands...NOR for the 3 kids who have no father....
61 likesIslamic justice - got it
4 likes@rafer Jefferson iii And lets not forget who initiated the whole situation. He coulda just gone ahead and filled his car up and left. But naw. Dude is a self-appointed parking guard out looking for trouble.
29 likes@rafer Jefferson iii I've been to a islamic country. I've been to the states, twice. But I live in Sweden. You ain't need to sell me on how either of the two former justice systems are fudged.
15 likesBut I ask again: what's the correlation between an american shooting another american, a sentence passed in an american court - and islamic law? I fail to see the relevance. Why not just call it american law as that is what it is and islam is not involved in any way, shape or form?
So that's the racist comment.
@Rosa Lind That’s not logical. Why would comparing US justice (which I’m stating I find draconian and vengeful) with another form of governance which is de facto draconian and vengeful be racist?
14 likesI think you’re trying really, really hard to make it about racism.
Perhaps you feel any negative connection to Islam is a form of racism, snd we have a duty to ignore it. If you’re a Swedish liberal then that’s probably explaining that.
Another point is that Islam is a religious and political doctrine and not a race. Unless you’re trying to say that the Islamic republic of Iran has the same racial makeup as Jordan, or Egypt, for example.
@rafer Jefferson iii So you are saying if he had gotten 15 years all would be well and good. But 20 is akin to amputation of a hand?
13 likesI understand how one could make a comment like your first one about islamic law in an offhand way. But you still think it's a viable comparison? Even though they're not connected in any way and the american justice system is notorious in the whole world for being a piece of shit?
You went for a cheap point. It wasn't there. Now can we speak about why a 20 years sentence is barbaric when the defendant shot someone dead basically in cold blood and still considers himself the victim to this day?
@Rosa Lind he didn’t though, did he? He didn’t walk out the house and shoot someone in cold blood. Are you forgetting the part when the guy came and pushed him to the ground?
9 likesI wonder if the fact you’ve already brought up racism where none existed, that the colour of the perpetrator and victim is adding an element to this.
People molest children and get lighter sentences. If that guy hadn’t pushed him, he would be alive.
It is NOT the case he’s gone out and murdered someone in cold blood.
This man deserves a long sentence, but sentencing in general in the states is very harsh compared to European countries.
I would imagine in U.K. you would have got life, out on licence after 12-14 years which I feel is about right.
@rafer Jefferson iii And bro, stop assigning me a motive and assuming my life story cause you've read some funky politically motivated attack piece on our immigration policies or supposed no-go zones or whatever.
9 likesIt doesn't bother me in the slightest, but you're holding yourself back because you won't be able to understand what people are telling you if you continue to view us as caricatures.
@Rosa Lind Caricature is being kind. We have race baiting liberals in this country too and I’m not interested in finding consensus as I don’t think I can learn anything from you.
10 likesYou shoehorned racism in at the earliest point and didn’t really make a good explanation for it. I can only conclude it’s the same kind of name calling, finger wagging real politik we see from the left here and I have no interest in forming alliances with ideologues.
@rafer Jefferson iii So you don't want to speak to me because in your imagination you know that I'm a fool? 🤭
10 likesWhatever guy.
@rafer Jefferson iii "The shooting happened after McGlockton and his 5-year-old son went into the convenience store, leaving a car that was improperly parked in a spot designated for people with disabilities. Drejka confronted McGlockton’s girlfriend, Brittany Jacobs, and shouted at her about being parked in the spot.
7 likesA witness, concerned about Jacobs’ safety, went into the store and told a clerk, according to Wednesday’s ruling. McGlockton heard the witness, went outside and pushed Drejka to the ground."
@rafer Jefferson iii No. I mean, yes, I am logical. It's a shitty comparison you're making. Islam literally has nothing to do with this. You're basically changing the conversation from why the punishment is medieval to what's wrong with Islamic law. I shit on religions any day of the week but I still don't muddle a completely unrelated topic with weirdly passive-aggressive comments about catholicism or whatever. It doesn't make sense to describe the ACTUAL way the american justice system works with how you perceive "islamic justice" to work. The only reason to compare them is to take a dig at islam. And you said it yourself that muslim nations differ greatly. So that's another point deducted.
11 likesAnd yes, I'm a swede. But bro. Why are you automatically assuming you know my life story because of what some foreign press has reported on Sweden?
And why are you assigning me a motive and life story because you think you've guessed my political views? Like, do you generally have good conversations and gain new insight like this?
You're acting like you have all the answers and can't be bothered with people who don't agree. It's ridiculous.
@rafer Jefferson iii Look:
11 likesThe defendant had a history of starting problems. Fact.
He'd pulled his gun without justification before. In altercations he'd caused. Fact.
He approached an unknown woman because he felt moral indignation. Screamed at her. Fact.
Another arriving customer goes inside and warns the victim-to-be that his girl might be in danger outside. Fact.
He goes outside and some guy is screaming at his girl. Fact.
Victim pushes the defendant away from his girl. A crime. Fact.
The victim does not approach the defendant. Fact.
The defendant shoots the victim in the heart. Fact.
And is later convicted to 20 years. Fact.
His appeal fails. Fact.
The guy comes of as a fucking loose cannon waiting to clap. If that's not 20, what is?
@rafer Jefferson iii "Two involved allegations of Drejka showing a gun. In another, a trooper accused him of aggressive driving and cited him after a crash when Drejka braked hard in front of a woman driving with two children."
4 likes@Rosa Lind There are lots of positives in Islam like anything else.
6 likes“Islamic justice” as a way to deride a harsh prison sentence to me doesn’t seem edgy, it’s descriptive.
I’ll apologise provided you do the same for accusing me of racism.
@rafer Jefferson iii Right, for me prison is not for punishment, like forbid your kids candy for a week when they behaved wrong. It has the reason to protect others from dangerous people. A serial killer should locked up forever. He will remain a threat. A guy like this has leant his lesson and is not a threat to society. Be honest guys, with whom you’d rather share a bedroom for a night: this guy or Manson?
1 like@WHITEB0NE as much as this guy sucks so bad, that really made me sad. Thinking more about the dogs, like the dogs don’t know why he’s gone, they just know that he is. Great now I’m crying. Thanks for that lol
2 likes@MadMoose Exactly what you said. I have no sympathy for the maniac who owned him. But the poor dog… ugh. Can’t even think about it.
2 likes@Slowa rim *maybe.....maby is not a word
1 like@Aloysius Devander Abercrombie
1 likeThanks
Only 20 years?
0 likes@BrunoFC did everyone miss the part where the guy pushed him to the ground?
0 likesThe way you speak about it, it’s like he’s a serial killer looking for victims.
If you pushed someone over would you expect retaliation?
Why are we framing this as an innocent man being murdered for no reason.
If he hadn’t immediately sprung to violence over a minor disagreement he would still be alive.
Hence I don’t believe this guy would be out shooting people, only if they assaulted him
Damn. Who would've thought that Drejka would be victimised in prison? He's such a smooth-talkin' military man, I thought it'd take half a platoon of marines to bring him down.
1 likeThank you for posting the outcome xx
4 likes@Eileen Debling
0 likes😉
@rafer Jefferson iii Great argument. Why not just release him and let him live next to you, while you're raising your black kids. I'm sure you'd feel safe.
7 likes@jougetsu imagine if you’d said that the other way around for a black murderer.
1 likeSo that’s what this is about. Its not a man who shot another man. Its racism, of course.
@rafer Jefferson iii you are delusional if you think he was justified in doing what he did. as he said himself, he was not prepared for a fight, he knew that there was a good chance his actions would produce an altercation, and he only approached the car because he knew he was protected by his firearm. yes he should not have been shoved to the ground, yes he was justified in drawing his weapon, but thats it.
5 likes@Sasha Spano agreed then
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii Let me get this straight. You see a complete stranger harassing your wife and children and you just ask him what’s up? And you think murdering someone is a justified response to… being pushed over? He initiated this confrontation, and deserved to be pushed away. What kinda sensitive little soy-boy cant take a shove after picking a fight?
3 likes@BrunoFC yes. If he’s just talking to my wife and child, yes, I don’t walk up to them and push them to the ground.
1 likeI doubt you would either, but you’re going to play like it’s a reasonable reaction.
This is all tied up with race, I can see why this is a pointless discussion because whatever analysis you make, you’ll say that resisting arrest or pushing people
Over in the street is justified.
If the victim was a white guy you’d say he got what he deserved.
@Slowa rim I think the medieval way would withdraw his gun permit and let him get beat up hardcore every time in this until he learns his lesson of minding his own business
0 likes@Natlee Yes propably. I"m sorry but as an european I''am a little bit sceptical about this whole puting in sombody half of a magazine because he push me thing. But do what you want.
0 likes@BrunoFC it’s drawing attention to a double standard and hypocritical position. You can write it in upper and lower case, as a dog whistle to similarly childish and obsessive CRT advocates, but that merely underlines the ill thought through groupthink position to which you subscribe and the accusation of racism is just a stock response when you can’t win an argument and therefore resort to mockery and accusation.
2 likesYou’re even making things up. There was nothing said by the defendant which suggests he shot him because it was a black man, you’ve invented that because it suits you.
You’ve also mischaracterised assault as “defending his family”
You do not meet a verbal altercation with pushing people over, that is not a reasonable reaction, you know this, but seek to minimise it because you’ve got a prejudiced position and can’t judge the victims contributing actions without the racial narrative wrapped around it.
I prefer to judge both the victim and perpetrator by their actions, and not their skin colour.
If I saw my wife arguing with someone, and I immediately assaulted that person I wouldn’t be surprised if they retaliated.
Drejka is guilty of murder; simple, but he wasn’t walking around trying to execute Black people because they were black, no matter how much you want that to be true.
@john s lol 😆 😂 🤣 😅 😄.
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii I’m gonna go ahead and ignore everything you said due to the fact that it’s not a double standard. You are simply adamant that I would treat the situation differently when in reality I told you I wouldn’t. you just can’t accept that a white man being so intimidated by a black man pushing him that he killed them over it.
4 likes@BrunoFC you won’t learn anything if you don’t listen.
1 likeWhat I learned today: @rafer Jefferson iii would have done the same thing as Drejka.
4 likes@PG I’m a racist murderer then. Glad we sorted that out
1 like@rafer Jefferson iii I read it, it just contained no answer.
1 like@Shotty what difference would 20 or 15 years make?
1 likeI think many of you are just plain weird in not mentioning or discussing the part where he pushed him over and seem to think that’s reasonable and OK.
Really weird.
@rafer Jefferson iii I thought that, 20 years without parole is a very harsh sentence.
0 likesOnly 67? That's WAY too soon.
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii murder, is murder.
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii "it wasn't planned it was just a dumb gun nut" sounds like the perfect justification to put a dangerous person away for life
1 like@rafer Jefferson iii bro. I don't think some people understood what you mean. Sad you had a debate some random over Islamic system. When you never mention such thing. You had my like Champ. You have some very good points. 👍
3 likes@rafer Jefferson iii You have some issues man. Yea the shove was an overreaction. But Drejka diffused the situation the moment he pulled out the gun. You can see the dude clearly stop and back up and Drejka is dead focused on him knowing exactly what is happening. And yet he still decides to shoot him dead in the chest as the man is backing away.
2 likesIt blows my mind you are more sympathetic to the man who literally killed an unarmed man as he was backing away, than you are to the man who shoved someone after a loud and aggressive shouting match outside with your partner over nothing.
Drejka was the aggressor from the very beginning, he went out of his way to not only engage the verbal confrontation, but also use deadly force when he got a scraped elbow. He admitted that he didnt feel physically endangered because of the sole fact the he was armed. In the video you can actually see that after the initial shove the other man was already leaving a fair gap between them and likely wasnt going to engage further even if Drejka didnt pull out a gun.
Give this guy 40 years for widowing a mother and leaving 3 kids fatherless. He didnt feel in danger from the beginning and he admits that. He had 0 reason to use deadly force and if that's the type of person you want as your neighbor that's fine, but keep those crazy trigger happy nut jobs away from my town
not long enough
0 likes@MusicAmore you’ve misunderstood, I’ve been clear:
2 likesDrejka is guilty of murder
Drejka deserves a long sentence (I just find US sentences are draconian and 15 years inside is about what you get in England for murder, I don’t see why you need 20,30 or 40 year terms, just seems cruel and unusual)
The sentence shouldn’t be so the family can get revenge.
The victim didn’t deserve to die for pushing someone.
What I also said:
Drejka didn’t go out executing a black man. He was provoked and over reacted. You had people saying he went out executing people. He didn’t, if the dude didn’t start a fight with him, he would have never shot him.
I don’t like Drejka, he’s a gun nut douche.
I also think it’s US gun culture and gun obsession which causes this, he was full of terms like “force multiplier” and all these things like “his hips moved”,
It’s another death entirely because of 2A.
He learned all these ideas in some gun club and wanted to use it in real life.
This would have never happened anywhere else.
Good . Glad to hear that
0 likes@WHITEB0NE the dogs are better off without him!
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii Damn good to know there is no violence in prisons thailand, or china, or Nigeria.
2 likesIf you seriously believe there is only violence in US prisons you are further out of touch with reality then I thought
@Jockberg there's nothing to suggest this was racially motivated. I don't feel he would have given a white woman any slack either.
1 likeWay to go Justice System.
0 likes20 yrs isn't enough time
0 likesI mean 67 is still not that old he’s still got a pretty decent amount of life left to live . What blows my mind is people who legit kill other people still can get outta prison I was in detox and there was a guy also on detox that had come a few days ahead of me that had just got out of prison for a 25 year sentence for killing another guy with a hack at the time I was 25 myself that man had been in prison my whole life but what blow my mind even more was he was out free yet he took someone’s life.
0 likesgood
0 likes@Vilimir yeah some people shouldn’t have guns. The one line I always remember is “I don’t want a gun because I know I’ll use it.” If you don’t have a gun then you won’t use it.
0 likesIf you’re like this guy and have one you’ll find a reason to use it. Guy should’ve just fought with his fists but instead he’s trying to be a vigilante over a parking space at a gas station.
That's sad
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii , so being pushed over for abusing someone’s partner (in front of their children) justifies being killed?
1 like@Allan Wright no way. I agree it deserves a long sentence. I am explaining that this man wasn’t planning on murdering people. There were aggravating factors.
0 likes@K EE or the wif3 and mother who watched the love of her life shot and killed like a dog when he hurried out to defend her and the little children
0 likes@TheApp9 What makes you think he's " learned his lesson,"?
1 like@rafer Jefferson iii Every school kid knows pushing people is not always " justified". Most dont lesrn its PUNISHABLE BY DEATH.
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii The k8ller brought up ",black" , which ipens the doir to people's 'assumptions'
0 likes@MusicAmore ✊
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii you're right! I would send him rather to Kolyma. For hmm.... 2 years? There are many many fun things to do there and the weather is incredible!
0 likesThank god he is locked up for a while as the prosecutor was waffling about nothing to do with anything
0 likesFREE DREJKA
0 likesHe deserves a medal.
0 likesFebruary 11, 2020, if I'm correct or not.
0 likes@Slowa rim the rafer Jefferson man is criticizing the Vhyles man by comparing his proposed sentence to that of medieval times. Not saying that medieval law was morally proper. You need to practice reading comprehension
0 likesgood 🥰
0 likes@Turner Moczygemba Ależ ja doskonale zrozumiałem.
0 likesThank you for the update
0 likesGreat 👍
0 likesright now Drejka is being punked in prison.
0 likesPrison accelerates the aging process something awful. If he's still alive at 67, he'll likely be in no condition to enjoy his freedom.
0 likesGood
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii Islam isn't a race buddy. All this EvErYtHiNg Is RaCiSt nonsense has become the Boy Who Cried Wolf fable. It's insufferable at this point.
0 likes@vhyles It was only 20yrs because it was deemed Manslaughter, not 1st Degree Murder.
0 likes@WHITEB0NE they should let people take cats to prison 😅. Dogs are usually friendly enough to bond with someone else but many cats only love one person and they could definitely be more readily accommodated happily. Besides I reckon it would generally reduce violence in prisons and improve prisoners’ mental health to have pets
0 likes@BrunoFC well maybe you will learn something from this case. I once knew a Vietnamese guy who habitually pulled knives on people and had actually stabbed someone fatally and done time for manslaughter. He said to me once that these white guys were a foot taller than him and he was not just going to let them bash him. He is the only one I met that articulated it explicitly but there are many who subscribe to that train of thought. It’s no good expecting everyone to operate by the Queensberry rules just because they happen to work well for you. If you expect to be able to silence or subdue and humiliate other men through physical force then you are likely in this day and age to learn a hard lesson just like the victim here.
0 likes@yannick245 And several teardrop tattoos under his eye.
0 likesI can't say I cried over his beating. Perhaps prison justice will help Drejka finally self-reflect and admit responsibility for murdering a father who was justified to protect his family from danger.
1 likePoor dogs...
0 likesOoh tell us more about the beat down...did it hurt? LoL
0 likesYesssssssss thank you for this update
0 likesHe doesn’t look like he’d do well in prison but then again most men wouldn’t.
0 likes@Janoy Cresva yeah, because the government didn’t just literally just hand their citizens guns.
0 likesIf he lives to 67
1 likeNo tears from me. I have absolutely no empathy for this person.
1 like@Rosa Lind "You ain't need sell me..." Sound like you from the same hood as the victim. No wonder you think him attacking someone over words is justified.
0 likesI get the feeling that Michael is the kind of guy who spends his afternoons drawing a pistol in front of a mirror while quipping one liners
1215 likesReplies (44)
so he deserves to be in jail for 20 years? :D
5 likesMany people do that. But still I wouldn't shoot a person backing up
15 likes@MegaRagingBunny for killing someone who was backing off? Yes.
71 likesPlenty of folks draw their pistol in the mirror. Its good practice to make sure you can safely and quickly draw your firearm. Yeah the one liners would be over the top.
10 likesLol! Taxi driver
12 likes@MegaRagingBunny He deserves to be in jail for a lot longer than 20 years for shooting someone who was backing away. The virtual guarantee that he practiced this sort of thing in the mirror is irrelevent to that fact.
14 likes@CalCustom He wasn't "a man backing away" he was a man who thought he can beat the shit out of a guy with a gun.
4 likes@MegaRagingBunny You clearly have no experience or training with threat assessment or reactionary procedure.
15 likes@CalCustom the dude was assaulted, possibly hit his head while falling, he is afraid, confused and in panic. Did you asses that? Do you know how people react with head injuries? Obviously not, or you wouldn't be making stupid assumptions.
4 likes@MegaRagingBunny Actually, yes I have a lot of experience in situations exactly as you described. I was a Force Reconnaissance Marine, and I used to hunt rhino poachers for an NGO in Namibia. It was my job for a decade to assess threats in violent situations despite being confused, afraid, or even concussed. Also, he clearly didn't hit his head in the video, nor did he claim he hit his head, so your entire comment is baseless. The threat had clearly deescalated before he pulled the trigger, so much so that even a person with a head injury could see.
28 likes@CalCustom oh so while being a marine, you often got in to verbal arguments about parking and got battered by physically imposing husbands while hunting poachers? You are a joke :D
2 likes@CalCustom also I appreciate you liking your own comments :D
1 like@CalCustom uneducated? Baseless? Also its funny that after I call you out on liking your own comments they stop being liked 10 seconds after posting 🤣
1 like@CalCustom " I used to hunt rhino poachers for an NGO in Namibia"
14 likesAaand with that, you have won this argument and all future arguments on this subject.
You talking to me? There’s nobody else here, so you must be talking to me.
1 like@CalCustom ignore the 12 year old, thanks for your service
14 likes@MegaRagingBunny if someone came up to me and pushed me to the ground and I was scared and I had a gun, I still wouldn’t shoot the person. Anyone who automatically decides to shoot someone because that person pushed them shouldn’t own a gun and obviously has some issues. Shooting someone should be a last resort. Don’t defend a murderer that’s messed up
18 likes@Krissy Meow So you call me out for attacking his character, by attacking mine?
0 likesIts not even funny.
yeah? cause he killed somone in front of his literal kids who will now never be able to see there father and are probably now traumatized
0 likes@MegaRagingBunny yes because he killed someone after already harassing a woman infront of her kids. Regardless of a placard, you don’t get to random harass people.
0 likesHe probably thinks he's the main character of an anime
0 likes@Kimberly Diaz that definitely deserves assault? Right? So you think that if someone ever talks to you when you don't want them to, you think you can assault them? Of course you don't, you would be in jail otherwise. Shows how far you are willing to bend reality just to fit your narrative.
0 likesExactly. Seen Taxi Driver?
0 likes@MegaRagingBunny no
0 likes@Zen give me time stamps where he says he was ok with the assault? You think going to a person and talking to them is confrontation? its worthy of physical assault?
0 likesIf you say he has threatened with his gun that proves that he can control himself, if he still is allowed to carry the gun after multiple incidents means that he was justified to do it or police would have revoked his right to bear arms.
When you write stuff, do you even filter it? Obviously not, because you don't see your own contradictions.
Also calling out someone for doing something illegal is not "taking law into his hands", in some instances not calling out an illegal act and not reporting it is an illegal act.
@MegaRagingBunny mentality of a literal five year old
7 likes@MegaRagingBunny brah if someone push you down you can pull your weapon to defend yourself but if they give up and back away you can't shoot them XD if anything you win and just file assault charge, not become a murderer yourself and face prison time.
3 likes@qwerty asdf throwing around insults? yeah that is definitely mentality of five year-old.
0 likes@MegaRagingBunny did you do it? Did your 20 page long thread free your hero from jail?
1 like@MegaRagingBunny someone’s malding
1 like@Kaleb H What hero? What are you talking about?
0 likes@qwerty asdf please don't project.
0 likes@MegaRagingBunny chill 😂
0 likes@Java Ras Racist, what has race to do with any of this?
0 likes@Alexander Redhorse What tough guy, what the hell are you talking about? Learn to deal with people that might have different opinion, will save a lot of frustrations in your life.
0 likes@Tobias He did personal attacks, so I responded by pointing out his insecurity. And how much did I focus on it, calling him out once is now a focus? OK bro ;)
0 likes@Krissy Meowjust because i have a difference of opinion doesn't mean its snarky. Grow up, the world is not against you and you are not the center of it.
0 likes@Kimberly Diaz His lawyer didn't agree with you, most stand your ground states don't agree with you, also many sheriffs do not agree with you. Instead they clearly state not to assault strangers in states with lax gunlaws. Its not even something political - its common sense.
0 likesWhat am I bending? And why would I fight someone who has assaulted me? What kind of ghetto logic is that? No one should be assaulting anyone, keeping verbal arguments verbal is common sense. If your first reaction to a verbal argument is physical assault, then you need to seek treatment.
Talking about therapy, sheesh.
@Java Ras I am not trying hard to justify anything, i have an opinion, that i have not been swayed enough to change and the character attacks keep me entertained so I hang around.
0 likesAlso misrepresenting evidence? What evidence? And evidence for what? I think you are confused.
"You even lie and mention that he hit his head" You just make up stuff as you go, I never made that claim. I might have said, that he might have or could have, as no one knows other than the guy who shot.
So what other "evidence" have a lied for or have misinterpreted? As pretty much I have had only one point that iv been pushing through.
Could it be that maybe you are just not smart enough to understand my point, why isn't that option on the table? Just because you cannot comprehend someone else point, doesn't mean its flawed or wrong or with a bad intent.
@MegaRagingBunny I'm sorry but when you watch the same video and even the perpetrator doesn't say at any point that he hit his head and you say that he might so you can justify his actions I once again question your intentions. You may want to skirt away from the fact that you are making the claim that the possibility of him hitting his head could be good justification for his actions despite he himself not mentioning it. So yes I think with no evidence you are trying hard to justify a murder. And saying it's your opinion doesn't get you beyond that.
0 likes@MegaRagingBunny just because I'm petty 26:51 the cop basically asks did you realize they may not like that too much? And he basically says it was fine because he takes the proper precautions and "has a permit". He's ready to take a life over a fucking parking spot. He knows it may not go well and he had his gun ready to kill over it. Nuff said. That shouldn't be your mentality as a gun owner or carrier of a firearm. Your mentality as a gun owner should be "how do I make sure everyone gets home safe?". You don't do that by confronting someone when they aren't harming anyone, and are breaking a minor traffic law.
0 likes@Zen "how do I make sure everyone gets home safe?" if that was true, nobody would carry a gun as gun is a force multiplier.
0 likes@MegaRagingBunny bro how much attention do you need? Just take the L and leave like an adult.
0 likes@Melatonin i don't need attention, I have no idea why you are giving yours. :D
0 likesHe's talking to the police like he thinks they are 'brothers-in-arms' debriefing him after a successful mission. Then he rigs up a shirt-sling for his arm to act like he's the walking wounded but is soldiering on for pity.
1596 likesReplies (15)
Yes, and later he took his arm out of said sling and was gesturing with it like normal.
66 likes@Joseph Imbert ??? Bro they talk like this with any criminal no matter the fuckin crime bro they gotta get something out of the suspect and without abusing or harassing them
92 likesGood point. It's gross
0 likesthanks captain obivous
0 likes@Joseph Imbert I hate to be fair to a cop but I gotta say if you were trying to incriminate him this is exactly the way to do it.
19 likes@Teggiano Salerno The guy was counting on his white privilege getting him out of this situation but it backfired hard. I love that.
16 likes@Farco LOL so when a black man kills someone in cold blood and claims self defense (happens all the time) what is he counting on?
3 likes@Farco LOL "I hate to be fair to a cop" look in the mirror long and hard. You are a radical. No good can come from your worldview.
2 likes@Teggiano Salerno Oh yeah, a black man would treat the police just the same way this guy does. It's not like black communities think all cops are bastards or anything, that'd be ridiculous. They love the police.
3 likes@Teggiano Salerno he better pray to his god they have at least neutral position on his race because the slightest leaning to steryotyping and racisim and hes behind bars for life no matter what evidence they have against him
0 likes@Joseph Imbert Guy clearly thought he did something that would earn him respect, they exploited that.
9 likeshe wasnt acting so tough once he was in prison dress lol
3 likes@Joseph Imbert they do that to get information. If someone is intimidated by a cop in an interrogation room they’re not gonna wanna say anything and they’ll wait for a lawyer. It’s a tactic they use to get info.
2 likesSometimes the criminal is so obvious that his brothers sacrifice him. They are likely more pissed about that than the loss of life.
0 likes@silkyslim2111 humor me. How should it have been handled?
0 likesIf you are a concealed carrier you have a responsibility to be calmer and more responsible than the average person. It’s not your job to enforce parking laws. Just mind your business, be polite and respectful, and hope against hope you never have to draw that weapon.
1213 likesReplies (79)
Exactly
15 likesStatistically speaking CCW holders are some of the least likely people to commit crimes, one study said they commit crimes less often than police officers. Unfortunately, a few scumbags like this guy still slip through the cracks.
43 likesThis, 100%. He should have left the girl in the car alone, period. Concealed carriers need to try to diffuse and avoid as much as possible.
37 likes@Whiskey Mutineer less likely than cops? that’s like everyone... over 50 percent of cops admit to domestic abuse...
35 likesEXACTLY!Even if she didn’t need to park there it wasn’t his responsibility to check her!It would have been different if he himself or someone else needed the space but other than that all he had to do was mind his business.And not only that but he was parked illegally himself....
9 likesThat's what we hope. But Americans have super easy access to guns and way too many can't wait to pull them out.
4 likes@Kyler Sommer that many REPORT to lol
0 likesI legit just posted something very similar before I read your comment. You are so right!
0 likesJust by the sentence you said I can say with full confidence, I love you
0 likes@Ashencloud bruh google it
2 likes@Spencer Lenahan the pure stupidity of that statement amused me
4 likes@Kyler Sommer yeah and women make 73% income for the same job as a man right? 🤦♂️
4 likes@Spencer Lenahan No opinion on this situation - just want to point out that telling people to "just Google it" is dismissive to the point of being counterproductive. Assuming you're right, they could just selectively search.
7 likesThis mindset is the rot of society in my opinion. It is not the sole job of only the law enforcement to address bad behaviour. Everyone in society has that obligation. That handicapped spot is there for a reason. To ensure there is a spot left for handicapped people when it's busy, besides usually being the closest spot to the entry and having more space so somebody with a severe disability can more easily been helped out of the car. If you park there because you're lazy it serves you right if somebody asks you to park somewhere else and if it was an honest mistake be responsible, take the criticism and just move your car. If people are not supposed to address bad behaviour anymore lazy and egocentric people will only abuse that to try to get away with even more, or we will have to put a police officer on every single corner to make sure people behave decently.
2 likesThis whole incident to the point of shooting is completely to blame to both the woman and her husband. Obviously the shooting was absolutely unjustified and if he would've just pressed charges instead of shooting the couple would've ended up with assault and parking on a handicapped spot.
@___Meph___ I am fully with him standing up for handicapped people and parking laws that is just a part of being a decent human, but I do believe that he fired his gun prematurely, I get that it was in the heat of him being attacked by that other dude but he should’ve had better self control
5 likes@carly jeffrey what’s wrong with normal citizens standing up against wrong behavior? You really gonna say people who are not disabled and park on handicapped parking spots should have the privilege of not being told off?
3 likeswell if someone did try to enforce parking laws, i think they would have a reasonable expectation that someone else wouldn't push them to the ground.
1 like”hope against hope” what?
0 likesJust having people know you have a gun escalates the situation. Just knowing you have a gun escalates the situation. Stay away from anything that's made to kill things.
0 likes@Kyler Sommer cops dont admit to shit so I know that can't be a real fact lmao
0 likesHe wasn't enforcing anything; if you watch again you'll see he barely even moved his body at all while he argued with the woman- he was stationary and objectively non-threatening in posture. The one that attacked him by surprise on the street, was the one enforcing things. A bully. Parks in the disabled spot to stop for snacks and drinks, then immediately surprise attacks someone that verbally confronts his party.
0 likesIn my opinion taking advantage of handicapped people isnt a good thing, but thats a wild thing to say ig
1 like@BroudbrunMusicMerge They could have heard that stat on Fox News for all we know.
0 likes@Xelio our society has already agreed vigilante "justice" shouldn't occur because of psychopathic idiots like Drejka. This video is the perfect reason on why people SHOULDN'T randomly confront strangers as if they're a legal authority.
0 likes@battery did you miss the part of the video where they state people within the store could hear the two of them arguing? He was clearly being aggressive, it wasn't a simple "please move out of the handicapped spot," it was a dumb ass playing traffic cop, taking photos of liscencse plates, and then screaming at the woman for her mistake. The dude pushed him to get his aggressive ass away from his wife, and then IMMEDIATELY backed off before the gun was even pointed.
3 likes@samvale 1 person would already way too many. And yeah we have easy access to guns, but the VAST majority of gun owners would never fire it unless a life was legitimately in danger. We have easy access to guns because of America’s history, it’s an important thing for us.
0 likes@Whiskey Mutineer something I often wonder, if guns were to help for protection, order etc then why is the front rate so high and many homicides?
0 likesJust leave the gun at home.
1 likeThere are a couple of scenarios where having a concealed weapon make sense, but in everyday society it makes little sense. You’re just a potential liability. If you want to protect people that badly, join law enforcement.
💯
0 likes@Rainy Watch the footage again. The victim stands in the same spot the entire time he is arguing with the woman. He does not move, he barely moves his body - and does NOT look threatening in any way.
1 likeThe attacker saw him arguing with his wife and instantly lost his cool - escalating the situation from verbal disagreement to violence. Am I wrong? Did we not see the same footage? And like I say, there are 0 indicators in either witness accounts or body language that he was threatening anyone verbally.
I'd hope people watch that footage and think about how dangerous escalating a simple disagreement about a disabled spot into violence can be. You put your own life at risk when you attack someone, particularly by surprise and with such violence.
@battery first of all, the murderer is not the fucking victim. Secondly, he literally was walking around her car taking photos, and yelling at her (they literally say they could hear them screaming in the store) despite being a random civilian with NO AUTHORITY or right to accost them.
2 likesHe heard the man screaming at his wife and pushed him away from her before immediately backing up, this occurs before the gun was even drawn.
The shooting after that was not at all justified, doesnt matter what the actual victim was doing beforehand because he was not threatening the life of the murderer, this is so clear that he got sentenced for it. Maybe next time, some random psycho with a gun shouldn’t be playing traffic cop for fun.
battery, just in case you are NOT trolling, the murderer circling the women’s car and taking pics with kids in it, was enough for her to shot HIM in fear of her life. So no the murderer did not have a right to make people feel unsafe and threaten and then shot someone, only to claim that HE felt threatened, that’s not how self defense works.
0 likes@Rainy "Secondly, he literally was walking around her car taking photos" No, untrue. Like i said, when he notices the illegally parked car, he stops and stands in the same place. He does not "walk around her car". Look at his body language before he was attacked and see if he looks threatening to you.
0 likes"He heard the man screaming at his wife and pushed him away from her". PSA for you very young people learning life. You're not allowed to attack someone on the street if they start flaming you or your wife. You're allowed to insult someone, you're allowed to be very pissed off and furious with someone. You're not allowed to attack people. He misread the situation, and instantly attacked instead of thinking.
Had the victim not shot the attacker, he should have called the police and hopefully gotten the thug arrested and convincted for assault&battery. The footage shows what can happen if you mistake life for a cartoon and start attacking anyone who "screams at your wife".
Again, HE WAS STATIONARY THE ENTIRE TIME, THE ATTACKER CAME UP TO HIM, INSTIGATED THE VIOLENCE. Are we watching the same footage?
@Ashencloud its a common stat* that people use... no idea where it came from but you hear it a lot in the acab community... I couldn't find a source either could a fried when we looked.
0 likesSo not pulled out of his ass... but someone's.
@Rainy If you attack someone on the street by surprise, you lose your right to immediate safety. It's that simple. He chose to attack and put the victim in a state of life&death shock, and he paid for it with his life.
0 likesPSA to bullies and thugs like the attacker in this video:
If you are in the habit of attacking people by surprise on the street, make sure you're also in the habit of raising your hands as soon as a GUN GETS POINTED AT YOU IN SELF-DEFENCE...
@NateSanti ...What? Have you seen the footage?
0 likes@NateSanti You clearly haven't watched the footage carefully at all. 1:54 He does not "circle her car", but is at the front of the store, nearby where the attacker's car. I have done the same thing when seeing someone illegally park in a disabled spot. He is literally just standing infront of the store, pacing briefly and slightly, until he stands in one position- again just infront of the store, not up in the car, right till he is pushed.
0 likesDo me a favour and watch his body language, the way he moves his arms and body, if he is moving closer to the attacker's wife, etc. You will see someone having a perfectly normal heated disagreement about parking outside a store. People have mentioned her safety, but she was inside the car with the door closed for the entire sequence... The victim was only attacked once SHE stepped up into HIS personal space. I'm not making this up, try and watch the footage again carefully. He was not being threatening, and didn't even notice the attacker, because he was just focused on scolding this woman for taking up a disabled spot to buy snacks.
Taking pictures of someone doing a particularly nasty thing in public like that is NOT illegal, yes, EVEN if you have children! And you're allowed to criticise other american's in public, you know. People in the store heard "raised VOICES", not a "raised voice".
And again, The victim was only attacked once SHE stepped up into HIS personal space...
@Rainy I'm being rude because i disagree with you? We have come to different conclusion based on the evidence, is all. No need to embarrass yourself so much mate, calm down.
0 likesTotally agree.
0 likes@Rainy Try to watch the footage again but in reality this time- you'll see that much of what you said is simply untrue and misleading. He didn't "push him to get him away from her". She was in her car up until the second he was pushed. He stayed still, outside the shop, she started to stand up close to him- then he was attacked.
0 likesReality can be hard- when the narrative doesn't fit what you're seeing. so you get angry and childish :) Try to watch the footage again and really pinpoint the moments for YOU that justify using immediate violence against the man, okay?
@Mikko how am I being a hypocrite? Do you even know what that word means?
0 likes@Rainy I'm very glad a thug is off the street, but unhappy that the victim is in prison.
0 likes@Rainy "If things had gotten violent between those two". Baseless hypothetical. You cannot park in disabled spots, then attack anyone who shouts at you for it on the street. Simple as.
0 likes"hyperfocus on the relatively miniscule details" Like that he was standing in a normal spot, never threatened her, was not close to her, never showed any sign of indicating he would be close to her? And that SHE MOVED TO HIM just before he was attacked? I'm really sorry you struggle with reading comprehnsion and critical thinking, but don't worry! maybe stick to things like arts and crafts instead of trying to critically think
@Rainy
0 likesOh? Are you aware what jury duty is? Do you know that in this case, a group of people like ourselves had to decide who was the victim in this situation? You wouldn't have been allowed to serve on jury duty, with this attitude that those who disagree with your verdict are "filth" that you already had "pegged" as such :) They screen people with obvious bias and lack of perspective right away!
You continue your melodrama all you want. In my opinion based on the evidence, in this incident the victim is the one who was initially attacked. I'm sure my character will be able to take the blows you give it based on this hahahah
@battery if only those around you would see you as the monster you are. Just know that there are forces beyond your control that have observed your horrid essence and will respond accordingly. Sleep tight.
0 likes@Rainy "he directly threatened her by walking around her car taking random photos and screaming at her". You don't understand what a "direct threat" is. Nor a threat. He threatened no one, his body language was unthreateneing (as we can both plainly see), and he verbally argued with her for parking in the disabled spot illegally. Normal altercation. No reason to believe it was necessary for him to be attacked.
0 likes"My guess though is that you only care when the victim is white, there I read the elephant in the room, the lingo gave you away." More ENTIRELY baseless claims. My lingo? Genuinely don't know what you could be refering to. ..."Thug"? Not everyone lives in the USA, my friend, english is a vast language. Thugs are thugs.
@Mikko you don’t understand the definition of hypocrite, and you call me an idiot? Lovely honestly.
0 likes@Kyler Sommer This guy responded to the situation almost exactly like a cop would.
0 likes@battery what would YOU do if someone was in an altercation with your wife and looked threatening?
0 likesIt's funny how calm and polite others are when they know your carrying I've noticed. That being said, I agree 100% with your statement. Love thy neighbor
2 likes@] Mantis-Mike [ this is why I think everyone should open carry. People would think twice about starting useless confrontations.
2 likes@Ashencloud If you look it up, you'll find it, but the number is 40%, not 50.
0 likes@Grass Saint of course the cops wouldn't admit to that. The family would
0 likes@Joey Tompkins The only reason we really have a right to bear arms was the stand up against the government-not other people. Considering how much the military has advanced and has weapons the normal people aren't allowed to have, that amendment is really nothing more than a mockery to it's original purpose. It's outdated and the only reason people still want it cause they have this impression that a bullet is the only thing in this world that can save them despite other countries proving that sentiment wrong over and over again...
0 likesTy. I need my hip replaced but had a heart attack which makes me wait another year. I don't like how people abuse handicrap spaces,. But live and let live. Not for me to judge why someone needs one. Not a reason to show off my temper.
0 likes@battery if he called the police after being pushed, he probably would have gotten in trouble too. There are EYE WITNESS accounts of him circling around the car and then (where the recording starts) started screaming at her. The victim could very well counted (of course depending on how they decide to recount the story) that as self defense/saving another person since he's clearly just one word from getting violent. He'd get in trouble for verbal harrassment, and the victim would get in trouble for parking in a handicap spot.
0 likes@ShinySylvie That's Not the Only reason. It never fails- those who call our constitution "Outdated" area the ones who don't have a fundamental understanding of it.
2 likesThe right to defend yourself, loved ones, your nation and property, as well as against tyranny is timeless and will never end. Ask the people of Venezuela how it worked out for them after they lost their right to bear arms.
@ShinySylvie Ask yourself- Why has no other country even attempted to invade American soil? Do yourself a favor, look up what our enemies leaders said about doing that, and why it's never been attempted...
1 like@] Mantis-Mike [ People who want to helicopter parent the world like this guy are horrible for society.
1 likeAnd I hate to break it to all the social justice and anti-racism folks but your movement is a helicopter-parent-the-world movement. Stop it or you'll ruin lives like this guy or worse.
@Teddy don’t act like the shooting was in anyway the couples fault. It’s completely unexpected and Insane to think someone would pull out a gun in this situation. That’s like getting killed for petty theft
2 likesIt absolutely was his business with the parking spot though. She was parked in a disabled only parking spot and the guy with the gun was a disabled person. Saying "iTs nOt uR joB" when it literally affects him is just ignorant.
0 likes@carly jeffrey he was parked illegally because he was a disabled person and she took a disabled parking spot. educate yourself before making stupid comments
0 likes@yuun paan That's not an acceptable reaction to shoot the guy just because he pushed you though. Somebody losing their life over a parking spot, and pretending his reaction was okay because he says he was handicapped is just ridiculous
1 likeExactly, why do you start shit then when confronted,💥🔫💥🔫💥🔫 “I FEARED FOR MY LIFE😖!!!”
1 like@] Mantis-Mike [ Go ahead and point out where I said it was acceptable to shoot.
0 likes@yuun paan You're making excuses for the shooter and babbling about a parking spot, just as he was.
2 likes@Sean O The man came up to someone parked on a handicap spot and checked if they had a handicap placard, then he told whoever he saw inside the car to move the car somewhere else since they don’t have a handicap placard, that is very natural and good behavior, there’s nothing creepy about it, he even said he didn’t see the kids because the windows were tinted dark, and even if he saw them that doesn’t change the fact that his motive is good and there was nothing creepy about what he was asking... stop trying to make mothers invincible to being told off when they are found obviously doing something wrong and this situation has nothing to do with the kids or the fact that shes a woman.
1 like@MyTrashSchuulProjects I never did, like I literally wrote: "... the shooting was absolutely unjustified". Nevertheless, up until the push, the couple was completely at fault up to that point and the guy was completely in his right to address the egocentric behaviour of the couple parking on the handicapped spot. In my opinion the guy should not have been walking around with a gun in the first place, as it is not allowed in most countries that I know of to walk in public with firearms. Unfortunately the US is an exception where this is allowed and you get this unnecessary escalation of things.
0 likes@Rainy while I agree the shooting was completely unjustifiable (I don't think people should walk around or own firearms altogether and this is another tragic example for that opinion). Up until the point and including the assault the couple was completely to blame. If the shooter would've went to his car to call the police instead of pulling out his gun the woman would've gotten a ticket for parking at a handicapped spot and the guy would've been rightfully charged with assault.
1 like@ShinySylvie headcannon. scary delusion
0 likes@macuser1232 Lots of cavemen in the comments. I would not have instantly attacked a man telling off my wife for parking in the disabled spot through her closed window, standing still. no witness reports of threatening. witness reports TWO raised voices- a standard parking altercation. He victim wasn't ready for violence, he wasn't looking for violence- it's clear from his body language. He was just attacked by surprise, and put into a panic position with life and death consequences.
0 likes@Rainy "your soul is rotted, no need to defend the light". Good to know the kind of lucidity i'm talking with here. I sincerely hope you get past your delusions
0 likes@Teddy Yup. I don't understand how anyone watches this footage and doesn't see a violent irresponsible thug. I see this as akin to break testing someone in a car, then getting totalled. Obivously the shot isn't ideal, but the attacker put his own life at risk by initiating violence on the street.
0 likes@MyTrashSchuulProjects It's insane to think a 47 old year old man would draw his concelead pistol after being attacked by surprise, still recovering on the ground? Could you explain why you think that?
0 likes@] Mantis-Mike [ It's misleading to say he lost his life over a "parking spot". He lost his life because he attacked someone by surprise on the street. Very simply.
0 likesThe wife was shouted at and argued with "over a parking spot". The victim was attacked by surprise "over a parking spot". The attacker was shot over "a surprise violent attack".
@battery he shot too early. Plain and simple. There was significant separation between the two of them so he wasn’t attempting to “beat him to a pulp” and if the attacker had any weapon he would’ve pulled it out by then or even while approaching the shooter.
0 likes@Spencer Lenahan if you are gonna make a statement like that, you need to be able to back it up with some evidence, not just GoOGle It
0 likes@battery So you would've shot the guy in the face, and ended his life in front of his wife and kids just because he pushed you? And pushed isn't a "Violent attack". Anybody would've defended their woman the same way.
2 likesThere was Plenty of open spots available. This guy picked a fight over something so petty and was looking to use his gun, for any reason, and now he's where he belongs. All over a parking spot.
@] Mantis-Mike [ The bully parked his car in the ONLY disabled parking spot, to stop for drinks and snacks.
0 likesThe victim chose to confront and argue with the woman upon realising this, as I would. He was not in her personal space, nor did his body language indicate a threat at ANY TIME (go ahead, find the timestamps where you think you can see him be threatening).
The victim was arguing "over a parking spot", yes. He was attacked over arguing with the attacker's wife, however- not the parking space. If you fools think you're allowed to attack someone by surprise when they are having road rage on the street, you're in for a nasty shock in the real world...
The attacker chose to end his own life by putting himself in extreme life or death danger... by attacking someone by surprise- then taking 3 steps up to him on the ground, taking an extremely macho intimdating pose- and going to continue the assault. He ONLY started to move back once he saw the gun- he was about to keep going and bully the victim.
Looks like a great trip to the store for a bully to me. Thinks you can park in the sole disabled spot and not be picked up on it by the public verbally? Think you can attack someone instantly who is just speaking to your wife from inside her car, someone who has not even moved their body for 45 seconds, someone who was only attacked ONCE the WOMAN STEPPED UP TO HIM.
Really worth critically thinking about. Same for your statement that "and was looking to use his gun, for any reason".
Quite bizare to me, to be watching the same footage as you, of a 47 year old man being attacked by surprise in car park - and only taking out his pistol once recovering from the attack... on the ground... Are you trying to have a serious discussion here, saying that he "was looking to use his gun, for any reason"? How much more warranted and immediate does the use of a gun have to be, if not when you're violently attacked from behind all of a sudden??
I haven't even gotten 2 minutes into the video yet....paramedics took 19 minutes to get there?! Stay safe, stay armed. When seconds count, help is minutes away.
0 likesHe shot a man and the only accurate statement he made about the incident was that the man he shot was black. He legitimately could not accurately recollect anything except for the color of his victim's skin.
12 likesReplies (1)
One other thing - the kind of gun he used of course
3 likesThis guy pisses me off! When watching the interview I think he actually believes that he didn’t just straight up murder this man in cold blood!
0 likesThere's a Wawa across the street from me. I've been there pretty much everyday, usually multiple times per day, for about 7-8 years now. I've never once considered it "my" store, and I certainly didn't approach anyone for a mere parking violation.
1 likeyeah nah, he had no reason to shoot him, its not like the guy was still on top of him, he literally walked away. Michael just wanted to kill him at that point
2 likesI feel like this guy and the cops definitely think they’re both on the same team so to speak. Like when all this guy sees on the internet are police officers killing and using their guns so easily, he thinks that this is all justified from seeing the police do it.
4 likesLawyers be playing with they while soul. He could have giving that argument without saying the shooter was the victim. If there is a judgment day, someone is gonna ask him about that one
1 likeThe tellers voice is really great. Normally
0 likesI want see my video without someone talking in between. But not with JCS.
The teller should really ask for job in tv or something. 👍
The guy had no reason to shoot the fire arm you can clearly see the man back up and put his hands up but he chose to shoot the man without being in amy danger of his life
0 likesHow’s the maximum time only 30 years. There are many people in prison for much much longer time for much less offense 😳
2 likesImagine being THIS entitled.
2 likesWhen people say they sleep with their gun by their side this guy literally slept with his gun. If he could marry it I’m sure he would. He was looking for a fight because he knew his gun was there and sure enough he got to use it. Good for you gun lover! No need to use your fists because you’re a tough guy!
6 likesIt doesn't matter how you feel about someone parking in a handicap spot when they're not handicap. The fine for doing so is a couple hundred bucks, it's not worth death.
0 likesAnyone wondering this dude got his ass beat by a black inmate who claimed to be the victims brother. He had no relation to the victim but ayeee Karma works in mysterious ways
13 likesReplies (1)
You'll never have revenge.
0 likesI never get why, they do such a serious interview, with not a lawyer in sight, crazy
0 likesIf I've learned anything from this channel, it's to never stop at gas stations in Florida.
1 likeIf he felt the need to pull out that gun so bad, he could’ve simply jus threatened him with the gun and walked away did not have to shoot him
4 likesReplies (1)
he wouldn't of got the satisfaction of payback, which I think caused him to ultimately pull that trigger
0 likeswhat a weak move. He got pushed to the ground and shoots a guy?
4 likesHe was so calm about the fact he killed that man... his reaction after the detective let him know the man he shot was deceased... no guilt or anything
3 likesReplies (1)
Spot on. A genuinely innocent person would of at least showed some emotions after finding out they just killed somebody. His reaction told us everything we already knew. He finally got to realise his twisted dream of establishing dominance
1 likeThis the type of guy who dresses, talks and acts like he's Ex-Military without ever directly declaring it. But in everyway shape and form wants you to believe he was.
1983 likesReplies (23)
I got the same exact vibe.
27 likesThinks he's some kind of vigilante, the worst kind of dude
72 likesThis is common in southern small towns 😂 usually they're harmless, if annoying. They might even wear a veteran hat or something.
15 likesHe says…. his store. These demonic sadistic cowardly thugs out there Are very territorial from lots of things in the past I’m sure and there’s a big problem in America I’ve noticed and I’ve been all over the world of these nut bags protecting what they think are there material things, places, and or people. They can’t help but to get into other peoples business I can’t imagine how many people he has harassed before and got away with it and I hope to God he doesn’t get away with this murder. Those poor babies had to see all of this!!!!! Florida still has electric chair right?
10 likes@Hunter Hudgens to be real, if the population of all of those states were 98% neo-nazi I still wouldn’t want to actually bomb them. There would still be millions of not nazis.
5 likesDo we actually know if he was in the military or not? I don't see any info on that in the video.
3 likes@Damn Son Whered U Find This definitely true. Most military folk I know are quite reasonable.
3 likesAssumed Stolen Valor by proxy
1 like@Themistertaco yes that’s it. That’s why I’m furious. lol wtf mate.
6 likes@MrSnicker14 no he was not
0 likesYupp that was my conclusion after only a couple of minutes.
0 likes@Spelunking Monkey You can just say you were ex-military, no need to insert your humblebrag about killing.
1 like@prepvsions he never said he actually put it into practice. Just that he was trained to know when he was dealing with a credible threat
5 likesVeloxFelidae right
0 likesThe kind of guy who works mall security but acts like a U.S. Marshal.
3 likesEveryone would have went home that day if he just minded his own business
1 likePro tip: ex-military folks don't talk like that lol
2 likesEquivalent to ROTC students
0 likesI never actually got that vibe from him at all LOL
0 likesYep, i got the sale feeling about him
0 likesThemistertaco lololol best comment
0 likesМихаи́л Ростов Are you his mother? Come on YT to police the comments? You’re no better than the guy in the video 😂
0 likesWow way to disguise your hate for people in the military.
0 likes“There’s almost no way of me being racist. My upbringing prevents that from coming out of me.” Please, tell me how this man is capable of feeding himself…
39 likesReplies (3)
No way to win. “I’m not racist” oh that’s what a racist would say. “I live in the south so racism is pervasive (note in the south both black AND white people are often racist) but I don’t act that way
4 likes“Green eggs and ham you know.”
2 likesIt was strange the way he said that. As though he admits it is in him, but dosent let it out due to his upbringing. Maybe he is just terrible with words? Who really knows with crazy people like this.
1 likeThe way he describes the incident, you'd think a linebacker tackled him. Clearly he watches too much Serie A.
3 likesThe prosecutor delivered that beautifully.
0 likesI am 100% for people using force to defend themselves, however this arrogant guy fancied himself an armed guard of convience store and felt that he had some sort of authority because he carried a gun. I'm glad he was locked up, you can't go start confrontations if you're armed.
2 likesUsually, I’m upset when they talk to the detectives. This time?? I’m ecstatic!!! 🙄
0 likesHis right arm looked fine in the beginning with out the cops in the room then he acted like he was dying in pain
2 likesHe actually paused before he shot and the victim moved back!!!! DRAKYE WAS WRONG!!!!NEGATIVE !!!😭
1 likeThis is why I carry pepper spray along with my concealed weapon. It’s great for when force is necessary but deadly force isn’t
1 likeMike Drajka: Connivence Store Cop. This time it’s personal!
6 likesThe way this guy talks about what he did sounds way too much like Dwight Shrute. If you are a photocopy of a sitcom character that’s a good sign you’re in the wrong…
1 likeI live in Europe and the fact you can carry a gun in the US just like that is beyond me. Then people like him use it and defend themselves that they were in a danger, even though the victim did not have any gun or a knife. Ridiculous
10 likesReplies (1)
I used a handgun to defend me and my mom when I was 16 and my dad was on a fishing trip. The second ammendment saves so many lives per year you wouldn't even believe it. I have spent a lot of time in Europe for work. You don't have the save quantity of drug addicted nuts willing to skin your face for a beer. I now live in Mexico where there are very strict gun laws and there have been 6 shootings within 5 blocks of my house in 10 years. Three weeks ago there was a hit that occurred right outside a church while my mother in law was in mass. You don't even understand the issues in North America.
2 likesI would’ve asked some following questions after his “ I haven’t been hit like that since my 20s”…. ‘ were you verbally assaulting a young mother then too,? Or was that another handicap sticker check moment also,??”
0 likesfor as many times as ive watched this, i realized that markese could have ran away faster, but he wanted to protect his family and not leave his wife in the line of fire.... awww
16 likesReplies (1)
amd he ran to his child, I wonder if he was wanting to protect him with the little energy he had left... :(
2 likesIt’s also a pet peeve of mine when someone who isn’t handicapped parks in handicap parking but this guess doesn’t have a handicap sticker either!!
1 likeAfter watching it again when he falls to ground after being pushed he is appear ing to be looking at him and dude is still kinda moving forwards and then he lifted up his shorts but he was mad for the being pushed it's a dang shame over being a parking police that young man will never see his kid and wife again and other dude is in prison. Stupid people mind your own business
0 likesI know his lawyers had a huge uphill battle trying to defend him but man, some of those arguments are just awful.
0 likesThis narrator is always my favorite one cuz he really deconstructs what the persons state of mind is and the specific ways they’re attempting to convey themselves.
996 likesReplies (17)
Isn't that the purpose watching this channel?
11 likes@Florence Jones yeah, but if you notice with the different narrators, they aren’t as thorough as this one, in my opinion. This guy seems to give pause at the right times to set up the current state of what’s happening with the facts at the current moment of interrogation in terms of who knows what, at the current point in the timeline of events.
29 likesIf you notice in the descriptions, different people are analyzing the each video
@Kenny Hooker JCS is the real deal, all the other channels copy his style
10 likes@Kenny Hooker I agree with you. The narrator has a lot of experience and that’s why he’s so adept at putting in the right information for us at the right time. There’s very few other channels that can do this anywhere near as well as this one. Most of the others make way too many interruptions or don’t do it with as much intelligence of delivery.
8 likesThe narrator makes a lot of shit up. Hardly professional
0 likes@Schule04 such as?
0 likes@j0nnicage Basically everything he is saying about body language. Hindsight is 20/20
0 likes@Florence Jones yes it is. It always feels like someone is dumb trying to explain the most obvious Things. Idk Man..
3 likes@Schule04 then why you watching the videos ???
0 likes@DaddyDonGaming Because I get them recommended everywhere for some reason
0 likesNarrator has a name
0 likesAlso the reason it’s so easy to watch through his hour long videos, as someone with a short attention span, that’s a big deal
3 likes@willow I'm with you on that. I have a short attention span too.
3 likeshe voice is so nice too
3 likes@Schule04 you ever thought that you wouldn't get the recommended to you if maybe you stopped watching
0 likes@Tyler Cheung I havent watched it before
0 likes@Schule04 of course hindsight is 20/20 to civilians but for the police it becomes second nature even if they’re not consious of it at the moment
1 likeThis guy reminds me of prisoners I hated who think they're prison guards when I was locked up
0 likesSo he killed him over a handicapped parking spot that he didn’t need… wtf yt people
4 likesSuch a STUPID reason to take someones life.
4 likesThe defense had me rolling my eyes
0 likesimagine victimizing yourself for a wrist injury after shooting someone
1512 likesReplies (43)
Sounds about white
104 likes"Ugh oh nooo shooting that father in front of his own kids was really hard on my wrist 😩"
87 likes@Cwyan2483 imagine people who would villify people over their race🤔
24 likes@pryese7 Fighting fire with fire will only make the wildfire grow more out of control. Stooping to his level of judgement on people doesn’t really help anyone in the long run.
12 likes@Cwyan2483 Thank you
6 likes@pryese7 yeah I don’t get it man. Racists confuse me on both sides. I don’t get how people assume that because one race suffers injustices, then that justifies that race to behave improperly towards all others. It doesn’t make sense to me.
14 likesDoesn't look good walking in all fine and dandy when talking to the police about shooting a guy. Might have been one of his smarter moves.
3 likes@Cwyan2483 still funny stereotype
0 likes@Cwyan2483 Say all lives matter without saying all lives matter
9 likes@katrina -w- pardon?
9 likes@thisdudegotreal Thank you for this. I love times we actually get to use this line.
0 likes@katrina -w- what?🤨
0 likes@katrina -w- Seriously? What’s with the whole “with us or against us” mentality (talking about in general, no specific sides) that makes it appealing?
5 likes@XxDAMARIESU123xX {DA ACTRUAL MARU SUIE} uhhh yeah that's how life is to certain things
1 like"Oh I hate the color Blue" Good for you I don't care
"Oh I don't think racism is an issue" you are part of the problem :T
@katrina -w- Just because racism is an issue doesn't mean that the appropriate response to it is more racism but going in the opposite direction. If you're against racism be against all racism and not just the parts that you don't like.
8 likes@ddandymann sorry, did you get beat up on the street for being white? Did you not get the job for being white? Did the police stoped you just because you are white? Did your ancestors get considered less worth of being alive and wore slaved because of that? Did the ramifications of them being slaved continued for hundreds of years until the current day?
4 likesThere is no racism against the oppressor, and white people have being the oppressor for hundreds and HUNDREDS of years and now people are holding y'all accountable and your first reaction is play the victim...
@katrina -w- By that logic no white person can claim not to be racist as that claim has a direct implication that not all white people are racist and thus makes said white person part of the problem. Do you not see the circular nature of your logic here? Also you never did give any ideas on how to solve these problems that you seem so passionate about. If you would like some then just let me know.
3 likesFeeling bad for Paulo cause one dude made a stupid play-on-words joke and ragers had to make it this whole big racial injustice white-suffering thing
4 likes@Flavored Chip i think its pretty funny, i call it the franz ferdinand effect, you say something controversial then leave the scene and let the miserable people of the internet fight and watch the chaos unfold
4 likes@paulo amido lol true
0 likes@Flavored Chip there’d probably be the same reaction if someone said sounds about black instead
1 likeImagine the situation without a gun.
1 like@Mr. RocknRollah it couldve been a simple altercation that everyone walked away alive from but no dude had to shoot someone over being shoved, absolutely pathetic, if youre nothing without your gun you dont deserve the gun
6 likes@katrina -w- “did the police “STOPED” you?”
2 likesLmao ima “stoped” you right there because your spelling and grammar confirm your intelligence is sub par
@katrina -w- you love playing the victim don’t you? Has any of that happened to you?
2 likes@paulo amido so being shoved to the ground is a reasonable response to someone telling your girl that you parked in a handicapped spot for no reason. The whole situation would have been different if he hadn’t shoved him as a first response
0 likes@katrina -w- I agree that racism has been codified into institutions and that black people (and other minorities at that) experience racism on an unrivalled level compared to white people. It’s systemic racism, and white people do not experience it. That said, racism as a concept is universally applicable - you can treat anyone, regardless of their skin colour, poorly because of it. In striving for equality, first comes the social learning that we are all equal and interpersonal equality (not calling people slurs or names or propagating racist stereotypes) and then expunging those same mentalities from laws. In that subtext, racist treatment can occur to anyone provided certain context.
4 likes@Dylan Partyka I disagree with her too, but try to pick a different argument than “you’re playing the victim.” I’m sure that will change her mind and think of you better.
0 likes@Anthony Isabella I disagree with her but the name calling is a bit much. Find a better argument.
0 likes@Zachary Morritt claiming you disagree with her and then coming to her defense more than once makes you seem unstable, I don’t need you to agree with me, and I don’t need to not call out stupidity when I see it, so I will continue doing so, thanks.
0 likes@Dylan Partyka lol yeah :]
0 likes@paulo amido why did he put his hands on him at all? There’s not a good enough answer period. That dude didn’t look like he’d be able to fight
0 likes@katrina -w- Never said that racism wasn’t a problem. What I’m TRYING to say is fighting racism with more racism doesn’t help anybody at all. Knowledge, empathy, and basically listening to each other to SOLVE the problem helps. Fighting each other for whatever reason there is will only have the fighting grown on a bigger scale. You can see this on any news in any country that’s in conflict rn!
1 likeif their was no handicapped plaque they deserved this im sorry but you can't be a scummy human and expect to get off without consequence..
0 likes@Zachary Morritt based
1 like@Anthony Isabella Defending someone whom you disagree with from childish attacks does not discredit your argument with the person you may be defending.
1 likeI wouldn't approve of someone attacking you baselessly all the same, though we're in disagreement.
@PON PON PATA PON see that's why I think this comment section is so funny, I never said ANYTHING like that XDDDD
0 likes@thisdudegotreal This is the type of people that has 1 braincell and always finds a way to put race into situations like this.
0 likes@Cwyan2483 Lmaoo you literally can’t be racist towards white people but okay
1 like@Anthony Isabella You can call people stupid to your heart's content, but it is that precise failure to engage with someone's ideology that is a severe issue. If your aim really is to mend the flaws in the social, political, and economic fabric of your nation (I'm assuming you're a US citizen), then empathy is a valuable tool in your arsenal.
0 likesThe first step is in recognizing that the intent of most people is in doing genuine good, and if you see flaws in their methods, pointing them out to people is far more beneficial.
Also, don't you think it's a little too simple to say that the reason why your country is flawed is because of stupidity? I imagine there is far more than one reason.
@Anthony Isabella You addressed a lot there, so I'll go point by point.
0 likes- Too many people believe the government and mainstream media's propaganda.
I am no fan of the mainstream media, but not because I believe there is any sort of conspiracy between the government and media to stay in power. I believe that an administration will put out information it thinks is favourable to it, and the media is a for-profit system, so it appeals to its base. FOX presents the news in a particular biased way, as does CNN. But even the more liberal news networks cut out some left-leaning people, such as Bernie Sanders. Ultimately, the media is far more conservative in the US than it is really anywhere else globally. People listen to who they want to hear.
- Too many people don't question anything because they're too stupid.
Yes and no. Many people in the US are politically disinterested. They couldn't care less about the bulk of politics, but you wouldn't think that on internet comment threads such as this when you immerse yourself in a particular type of people - engaged people who are political. Many of my friends are politically disinterested. For those who are, many will ascribe themselves to a specific group of people with shared philosophies (their in-group), and in-group bias causes people to have a hard time engaging with ideology outside their circle. This is propagated by the internet, where it is easy to find other like-minded individuals.
- Education + Common sense would lead the nation down a better path.
Education? Yes. Common sense? What is common sense anyway? Common sense is in the eye of the beholder. What you might think is common sense, I may not, so I can't speak to your common sense. But education in the United States is massively undercut and underfunded, so I agree with you there. As for what you said about smaller governments, I think that smaller governments are only more effective than larger governments when corruption is rampant, and a state's democracy is weakened. The system of voting in the US is convoluted and painful. Corporations are allowed to give unlimited donations to fund charities, and the revolving door between Washington and Wallstreet practically spins off its own hinge. Address those things, in addition to education, and I think you'll see a major improvement.
- There are just too many morons. (People can't parse the difference between their / they're / there.)
What about spelling? Not sure why you're so hung up on that. People's ability to pick the right word doesn't correlate with their well-meant intentions. I do think there is a lack of education in the United States. Still, it is equally rivalled by widespread corruption and political divisiveness attributable, at least in part, to internet ideological echo chambers and for-profit corporate-run media.
- People assume we're equal, but we're not.
In ability? You're right; we all differ. In worth or intrinsic rights? We all must be treated equally under the law, and we should strive to treat others equally.
- You (you reading this) think you're stupid but still smarter than most people you meet.
I find that very judgemental - which I'm sure you'd agree with but say is justified. I just don't see the value of comparing people as opposed to ideas. I know too little about you to cast any judgement about you personally, so I don't (or at least not vocally, anyhow; we all have internal monologues).
- If you don't realize the above, you're an idiot too.
Guess I am.
@Anthony Isabella You're the first commenter I've seen on this video that isn't a lunatic. Based.
1 like@Based Lord cheers mate! I wish you the best.
1 likeThey both were looking for a fight tbh, dude comes, pulling up his shorts getting ready, and immediately pushed and looked for a fight as much as the other idiot who shot. He backed up because of the gun. If drejka didn't have a gun the other idiot definitely would have wanted a fight, loads are like this
0 likesHow did it possibly take 25 days to arrest him
2 likesNeutralize the threat!?! A parking violation?
2 likesNeutralize a threat it militaristic, dudes a public servant? Wtf
I’d be pissed if some guy charged me to the ground but if he doesn’t motion or have anything in his hands I’m not pulling that trigger.
4 likesReplies (1)
This murderer took a fathers life over a freaking disabled parking spot. Why are there people walking the streets like that?! It's none of their business. He is the male version of Karen
1 likeHe is the kid in school who’s way too obsessed with the military
6958 likesReplies (72)
Omg yes!! Those kids are so weird.
165 likesNothing wrong with that as lomg as you dont kill nobody
135 likes@Viper lmao bet youre an usamerican
48 likes@Arturo Ordaz
46 likesI agree with you but there is one thing I believe you are missing.....the original post he said "obsessed with" but you said "interested in"....
Big difference...
@Caden Luke I hate dudes like that. We
48 likesMarines don’t even talk like that. We use some of the jargon, but if u over do it, people will look at like you like you are a recruit. If u talk like a recruit, people will people will treat u like one.
Yeah but totally incompetent to join
6 likes@Caden Luke @Caden Luke He's one of the "I almost joined the military" or "I could have joined, but..." types.
22 likesAnd probably is frustrated because he failed to join because it’s too stupid to score good ; and lived whole life with some delusional pride and got a gun praying to have a chance to prove himself he is good
11 likesLegit all I could think of every time he said negative and neutralize
15 likesFree speech, yet consider broad comments like that may ruin someone's life unintentionally
1 like@Viper they are obsessed with it for the wrong reasons. The pride and violence.
14 likes@Viper most of the world however finds it odd that Americans are so often obsessed with the military
14 likesHe was bullied in his juniors for sure!
2 likesI wanted to be a man for ONCE.
rotc kids
1 likeOmg there’s one of those at my school... should I be worried 💀
2 likesYou dont need to be in the military to get to play w guns... you can go to the range
1 likeWho isn't, the military is cool as fuck
4 likesBut never got to serve.
0 likesLiterally oh my god hah. My ex.
3 likes@Wabbajock Dugatti ok I know that and I go shooting out in a field
0 likesLiterally
1 like@Dw3yN at what?
0 likes@TheSleepySnorlax because we are bullies who want to control everything. I am ashamed of my country. I would give up firearms in a heartbeat. If they don't have guns your chances of defending yourself with a knife or pepper spray has to increase even if they have a melee weapon. Not much you can do about a gun unless your quick draw mcgraw.
6 likesDid everyone have that kid in their school? Had one who when we had roll call (particularly in new school years or with substitutes) he would yell out “SIR YES SIR” and salute. Very weird
3 likes@Viper *as long as you dont push it on to others every chance you get
0 likes"NEGATIVE! I don't fight. Never have been a fighter." :D
0 likesthose were the laughing stock in the military.
0 likesI mean the military is sick with there massive warships and tanks and all round tactics and weapons
1 like@Mean Pee exactly. People act like it’s an honor, but the military is never used for good, just oppression
2 likes@Petit Bun men are bred for war
0 likes"You're disrespecting a future US Army soldier"
2 likes@Alli M. you might want to learn some grammar weren’t you supposed to pass high school
0 likes@Viper we need these type of people. You wanna get drafted? Of course obsessions aren't practical but a deep interest can be admirable
1 likeYep, and of course he wasn’t able to make it in. Funny how people who get scared by people who look different can’t manage to join a diverse organization.
0 likes@Caden Luke I know such a person, he is a cringe fest.
0 likes@Dw3yN do you disagree with his statement?
0 likes@TheSleepySnorlax what's wrong with supporting the people who protect you?
0 likes@Viper Technically there's nothing wrong with anything as long as you don't kill nobody, or harm nobody, or harm nobodies property.
0 likesBut never join.
0 likes@Dw3yN how that?
0 likes@Abelsm it's not wrong to support the army as such as the military has a use. But to most of the world America seems war obsessed, America also shows a much higher level of patriotism that most of the world sees as odd. That and Americans say they give utmost respect to veterans, yet a significant number of vets end up homeless.
2 likesYes!! All camoed out!! Marching down the hall ways lol
0 likesHey hey hey now you’re disrespecting a future US army soldier
0 likes@TheSleepySnorlax, most of the world doesnt understand what its like to be the most powerful nation in the world. A lot of the world knows nothing of patriotism and freedom and all they know is hate and jealousy of those that have it. Not everyone wants to be under the iron boot of tyranny and communism. 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
0 likes@Viper, lol amazing how you got so much hate from that one statement and some of it has nothing to do with what you said.
1 like@Brock Casey, so the military should have little warships and no tanks, tactics, or weapons?
0 likesDo you wish to be less able to defend yourself if there are people that want to kill you?
Then he should have got to birthing basic training or boot camp maybe he would have learned some trigger discipline but I’m sure he would have dropped out or recycled until he was discharged
0 likes@Dw3yN no butt hurt. He speaking truth full cap. You’re the one assuming lol
0 likes@Abelsm Canada’s better. Better beer. Better water..... better people in general clearly. Lol. This shit doesn’t happen. Nor do George Floyd incidents lmfao
0 likesAs one of those kids I can assure you I don’t and never have acted that way
0 likesI'm actually grateful to those guys because they're the ones bananas enough to enlist while walking away with their high school diploma in the parking lot.
0 likes@bigmac ndcheese should you be worried?
1 likeGoogle “school shootings”.
The USA is broken. Yes. You should be worried.
I was that kid until puberty, oh and hitting 16 and realising death and war isn’t the fantasy TV and movies portray.
0 likesthe jrotc kid who has too much interest in ww2 guns and military planes
0 likes@cara Can I ask What JROTC stands for please. New one for me thanks 🇬🇧
0 likes@Jambutty its an elective for highschool in the US that basically just promotes the army, they have to wear uniforms once a week and learn abt military leaders etc it stands for junior reserve officer training corps
0 likes@cara Thank you so much for taking the time to explain that. As being English I’m fascinated by your culture. Quite a lot of it seems confusing or goes over my head. Been watching some US university marching bands recently. They are really good bands. The costumes and dancing is alien to me but I’m starting to enjoy them,Thanks agin if you ever need anything explaining from our culture I’ll do my best .
1 like@Jambutty Its no problem man other cultures can be confusing i get it
1 like@Viper What do you think people do in the military?
0 likes@Dw3yN you seem defensive
0 likesHe's the ROTC kid whose takes it WAY too seriously.
0 likesI have to say, my brother knows his guns and knows how to handle them. And would do nothing like this, But this guy completely abused his gun rights and used excuses to make him seem like the victim. There are people like this guy vs people who really know how to behave in these situations. But I with your words. Take no offense to my statement
0 likesNot a problem bc people are obsessed with worse things
0 likesBut never joined.
0 likeshes the kid who takes a chicken nugget from your tray without permission and get all angry when confronted about it
2 likes@Dw3yN how is that being butthurt? Hahaha, everyone has a passion/obsession with something they really like, and the guy stated a true fact, you definitely sound like the weirdo here.
0 likes@Wabbajock Dugatti
0 likesOr Los Angeles.
@Sp0okykidd
1 likeAnd religion.
That was me and now I'm a pacifist.
1 like@Bird Europe isn't a country. 🥴😂😂😂😂
0 likes@TheSleepySnorlax I feel like you're the type of person to see a soldier homecoming video or heard a soldier being thanked for their service and believe that Americans in general are obsessed over the military
0 likesNEGATIVE
0 likesWavy lines?
0 likesWhat kind of absurd defense
I wouldn’t believe a work this joke of a lawyer was spouting.
The true victim?
Disgusting “defense”
20 years carrying a weapon so you can shoot someone who is attacking you.
1 likeCops are Varsity and he was coming off the bench from the Junior Varsity… but he finally had a chance to shoot at a REAL TARGET❗️
He didn’t spend 20 years AIMING AT TARGETS n🚫t to pull the trigger. 🤷🏼♂️
This man has no need to even go to court. It's all here lol
0 likesThat guy definitely didn’t have to shoot, the man was backing away from him, he should be in jail
0 likesOne thing I've taken from all these videos is never get interrogated without a lawyer.
388 likesReplies (17)
NEVER, specially when you're guilty but even more so when you're innocent cause it's then when you have the most to lose.
40 likesExactly!!
6 likesSaul Goodman taught me that years ago
14 likesAnd if your lawyer wants you to answer police questions, fire him.
11 likesCorrect. Under US law you have the right to a lawyer. You don't "look suspicios" if you execute your rights.
5 likes@J B My mom taught me that years ago lol
0 likes@503 Workshop You're full of shit. He was convicted because the interrogation was shown to the jury. The pigs took a three second event of a guy getting attacked by a powerful thug and expanded it to millisecond by millisecond Monday morning quarterbacking event.
3 likesThose pigs had him doubting his own judgement for crissakes.
It's cases like this that make me think there should be an IQ test to be qualified for jury duty.
I think its easier said then done... the cops are really good at manipulating the situation
2 likes@503 Workshop Watch the video again. Jim states that because of what he said he couldn't possibly say "I feared for my life and that's why I shot" anymore. A lawyer could've helped him there.
0 likes@503 Workshop Yeah, Drejka is the prime example of why regular Joes should not be carrying weapons.
2 likes@503 Workshop I beg your pardon?
0 likes503 Workshop Everything he said was facts. The gun won and the guy pushed him for no reason. Trying to call the guy a racist too lol and even said you’ll block him lol you’re pathetic
0 likes503 Workshop lol that’s what I thought you better delete that bullshit response
0 likesSteve Stampbach As Little Stevie Avery once said to his sister Barb, in MaM Season 2:
0 likesYouuuuuu got dat right!!!
503 Workshop reply to the racist comment I said then lol I know you won’t because I never said anything racist lol
0 likes503 Workshop that’s what I thought
0 likes503 Workshop im still waiting for you to reply to my racist comment lol
0 likes19 minutes for a medical response time? Seems like an eternity
1 like42:30 you know he is fucked when his legal team is trying to convince the jury non-hd video, and compression artifacts has any influence on this murder lol
1 likeIf someone pushed me I’m definitely not just pulling out the strap and shooting. It was wrong point blank. So many things to be mad about and you want to go off over a parking spot at some random convenience store. Even if you are handicapped. That’s fine, you get mad judge how you wanna judge then move on.
1 likeReplies (2)
“I’ve never been in that situation” Micheal said it himself. He was never in any kind of serious fight and his first instinct was to shoot this man. No words, just raw fear.
0 likes“I never said a word till I fired”
0 likesThe scariest part is that this guy thinks he did nothing wrong.
8 likesReplies (2)
Wanna know the worst part. This guy would have been a self described "responsible gun owner" before this incident. I wonder how many more "responsible gun owners" there are out there that are just like this guy. Living their lives every day hoping for the day they get to use their gun.
1 likeDoes he? How do you know that?
0 likesMr mindreader
Michael seems like the type of dude to say “gracias” at an Italian restaurant
30068 likesReplies (224)
LOL😂👍
181 likesAnd with a THICK Texan accent
1139 likesFuck that’s spot on.
409 likesYeah it’d sound like “grassy-ass”
1168 likes@YM Sx k 7
7 likes@sydney campbell 😂🤣 lmfao
66 likesThis is so spot on. Best comment. 😭
49 likes😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
5 likes@sydney campbell shit you totally beat me to it! Lol
26 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🥴 you right though
5 likesOh ya n guns aren't made for people who cant fight lol
9 likesHe looks more like the guy who says "CYKA BLYAT" in a russian restaurant
2 likes@kingpest13 Gracias is Spanish.. Grazie is Italian.
56 likesyup and pronounce is “grassyass”
18 likesIkr he is like a male Karen
38 likes😂😂😂😂
0 likesSorry if I don't quote you when using this in the future.
8 likes😂😂😂😂😂
1 likeLmao 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1 likePeople say thank you in Italian restaurants all the time 🙄
4 likesdamn. I feel personally attacked lmao.
3 likesDenada
4 likes👍👍🤣🤣
1 likeIt's really close in Italian: "grazie" pronounced "gratsie"
4 likesMakis makiavelis indeed Grasias is Spanish 😝
2 likes@berben tonny
3 likesI know. I meant that they sound similar. But I think in spanish the c sounds more like th
in italy a man like this will never have a gun and who have it are not allowed to keep it with themself outside from the house
9 likesDriftedKart259 geez, this had me in tears xD
1 like"Grassy ass"
6 likesHe is a hero
4 likesRicky Cairns that’s the point
0 likesI know cuz you're totally supposed to say "obrigado". I get it. Haha
4 likesMr bean
0 likes@Ricky Cairns duh, wtf!!!!!!! That joke went over your head huh?
5 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likesGarcias **
1 like🤣
0 likesGrazie would be Italian...go you!
0 likesThe comments are sometimes toooo genius. 🤣🤣🤣👍🏼👏
4 likes@Niebo
1 likeWho????
Thanks a LOT.
2 likesI just woke my kid and my dog up laughing.
Bahaha😂
0 likesHAHAHA
0 likesBest comment here
0 likes@sydney campbell people say that shit on purpose? I do it as a joke
0 likes@omerta jay lmao are you gonna say thank you in Russian at the next restaurant you go to?
5 likes@omerta jay lmao dude... it’s not your country. It’s the natives land that we stole. Plus English is not the official language of the US. Look it up.
12 likes@Makis Makiavelis only if you’re from Spain
1 like🤣🤣🤣🤣LOL
1 likeOr closes the fridge with his hips... Yuck...
0 likesSo..a Dad.
0 likes@Reggin Reggin The idea of a country is a construct of borders. Borders change all the time. Land is land. This was their land. Period. Their borders were based on tribes. My point still stands.
0 likesmost people working at Italian restaraunts nowadays are Mexicans...so...what are you saying?
4 likesAs italian, I feel it!
1 likeAND expect them to be grateful that he tried.
2 likesI don't get that caltural reference. Please explain. Thanks
0 likes@AL gracias means thank you in Spanish! So it's a way to say how ignorant they look trying to brag about what they think it's right.
5 likes@AL he’s attempting to connect with the investigators by saying stuff like”affirmative” and other crap, kind of like how an upper-middle-class adult would try to connect with a waiter/waitress at an Italian restaurant by saying “gracias” or thank you, in Spanish.
6 likes@DriftedKart259
5 likesI need a clarification on that :)
Is it frowned upon to try to connect with waitresses by thanking them in their own tongue, or is it because of mispronounced 'Grazie' ? Thanks.
PS I dont think that guy was saying 'negative' and other stuff to connect but rather he had been playing cop all his life, which clearly shows in other moments.
@Aurora Biondo so it's the ignorant bragging.
3 likesAsking coz in Europe there are dozens of languages. So when a foreigner tries to thank/greet a waitress or a store clerk in the local language, even with a very bad pronunciation, it is usually received kindly, as an attempt to be polite towards the local culture. But I guess it's a different story here.
how do you hilarious folks never fail to serious comments sections? Bravo. (ss they say in Greece)
1 likeArrivederci.
1 likeHe type to say "grassy ass"
0 likesAnd screams at foreigners very slowly, thinking that will help them understand a language they don't know.
1 likepretty funny , Italian food is terrible here in australia and Mexican is on a par with it.
0 likes@YM S Hahaha STOP IT 🤣🤣🤣👌🏾
0 likes@sydney campbell Hahahaha 🤣🤣🤣LEGEND
0 likesor "thank-uh you-uh"
3 likes@sydney campbell ok...dat made me chuckle a bit
0 likesAffirmative 🤗
0 likesAnd he would be so proud he would exclaim, "See! I can speak mexican too!"
3 likesLMAO
0 likesLMAO 😂
0 likes"grassyass"
1 like😂👏😜
0 likes🤣
0 likesI actually laughed out loud. Thank you I needed that 😂
0 likes@Long Dong shiver me timbers
0 likesThat and leave his phone number instead of a tip for the waitress
7 likesItalian ? Try Japanese !
0 likeshe probably says arigato at a chinese restaurant as well
4 likesLol! I've experienced that but the other way around: being a Spaniard myself living in an English speaking country, and a number of times someone tried to pleased me by uttering a word in Italian, just because my actual Spanish name feels Italian to them. At first I used to laugh and explain, last times though I would just answer in Italian myself and move on, I waste less time that way.
0 likesZangief The Red
0 likesikr 😅
Too true
0 likes"Grazie" is how to say thank you in Italian, so an Italian person would understand
1 likeLmao
0 likesLol
0 likes@sydney campbell 🤣🤣
0 likes@Maybo J Oh they are out there.
0 likes@spectrealangritch Ok 😂😂😂
0 likes@Park Chimmy Ok. WTH is a black African? Which is it fool? 😱
0 likes@Park Chimmy And then on top of that. The point is off people trying to use a language and chopping it up. He's/she's complaint about people using their own language.
1 like@T J I hate when people don't get it and comment messing up the whole joke.
2 likesevery fuckin one of us said to ourselves "grassy ass"
2 likes😂
0 likesYeah after asking for a taco salad.
0 likes@Dr. Funkinstine bean and cheese burrito 🌯
0 likes@Chubby Catfish ni
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likes@Maybo J male karens don't shoot
0 likesid say Prego anyways
0 likesDed
0 likesLMFAO
0 likes@YM S GRASSYASS SEENYOUR
0 likesThe first thing I said in my head was that the top comment is gonna be a joke. Everyone tries to be a comedian here.
0 likesunfunny
1 likeYeah right and the dead guy would lay his napkin in his lap and say Grazie As he held his wine glass for a refill
0 likes@cutieduke how so?
0 likes@cutieduke and yet it has 10k likes
0 likesAnd if yall made fun of the black dudes probable accent everyone would be screaming "racist"
2 likesOh the double standards
Or bonjour in a Chinese takeaway.
1 like@omerta jay racist
0 likes@Homunculus Rex ?
0 likes🤣
0 likesAnd you know he pronounces it GrassEeAss
0 likes@Homunculus Rex uh what?
1 like@sydney campbell Like Brad Pitt in Inglorious Basterds tier horrible pronunciation lmao
0 likeswe all know his type, how he votes, and who he supports. He's the kind of guy who is the first to wave the American flag, but the last to serve his country in the military. Your comment is a bit small minded though, as gracias is used EVERYWHERE where I come from.
1 likelike graci is so different from gracias
0 likesmooch-is grassy-is
0 likeshahahha lol
0 likes@Homunculus Rex
0 likesYou are!!
@Rita Kapia 0
0 likes@Homunculus Rex
0 likesProve it.
I'll give you 18 minutes.
@Homunculus Rex
0 likesI'm colored.
@Homunculus Rex
0 likesIt's the black bible. Written by black jesus.
The dude literally made himself a sling with his shirt....what a doofus.
1 likeBest comment
0 likes@Ricky Cairns he knows...dude...way to ruin the joke.
0 likesWhy no one talks about the fact that the initial physical aggression was a massive overuse of force. He pushed him from the back on a concrete floor for a verbal altercation. People have fucking died for falling wrong. It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself. At least he helped society by terminating an animal.
0 likes@omerta jay Olive Garden isn’t Italian. Go to Italy and try to use English. Grazzi or gtfo
0 likesAHHHH HAHAHAHAH TRUE LOL XD
0 likeshe would try to say gracias but would actually say grassy ass
0 likes@pink wolf Not really. They're made to protect hard-working people from lazy scum that are trying to swarm them to rob them.
0 likesThe assault a server for only serving Pepsi and not coke
1 like@Makis Makiavelis depends where in Spain, some parts use “C” other parts use “th”. All stems from a historic member of royalty who had a lisp, and his loyal subjects imitated him! Mad world :)
1 likeHe shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
0 likes@Chris Hopkins
0 likesHolly crap! I didn't know that. So, the "th" started when people wanted to make a member of royalty feel better about their speech impediment? They must have loved him very much or feared him very much.
@Makis Makiavelis It depends, in Spain c is closer to the "z" sound, but in most of Latin America it resembles more the "s" sound. Tho I recommend not generalising anything Spanish related since there are a lot of countries and they all make their little tweaks to the language.
1 like*"grassy-ass"
0 likes@Homunculus Rex Drejka sounds like a west Slavic name to me. If you are of the belief that Czechs, Slovenians, etc are not white then you really need to have your vision checked.
0 likes@Dio A I'm sure you're one of the geniuses who think whites and blacks are a race, right?
0 likesLmfaoo 😂😂😂😭💀
0 likesAny Italian would understand the Spanish way of saying thank you and vice versa. The difference is more like a different accent than a different language.
0 likesOh you know he does 💀
0 likesMi sento preso in causa
1 likeLol the color is off and it's not 4k so 🤷 this video isn't accurate. How many lawyers are going to hell? lmfao
0 likesBro I love YouTube just reading people comments fussing at each other over such pathetic stuff 😂😂 people are so sensitive.
1 likeBut said as “grassy ass”
0 likesLol this is fucken hilarious 🤣
0 likesDidn't get it
0 likesSheee Shee at the chinese buffet.
0 likesHaha!
0 likesGrazie! :)
1 likeLike Aldo from inglorious basterds
0 likesFlawless 😌
0 likesOh no! You shouldn't have said that! I say gracias! Lol!
0 likesGracy yis
0 likes@sydney campbell 666th like
0 likesThe bus boys and some of the servers are all hispanic most of the Italian restaurants so that would make sense.
0 likesI HOLLERED 🤣
0 likesYooooo 😂
0 likesIt's the accuracy for me...
0 likesHahaha great comment
0 likes@Sophia Troanska There were no ownership rights back then SOPHIA so stop perpetuating lies.
0 likes@Sophia Troanska Incorrect. Again, there were no land ownership rights for NA. They were nomads squatting on land that they themselves seized control of from the people who occupied it before them so it was up for grabs and constantly changed hands. I'm glad I could educate you because you desperately needed it. You're welcome.
0 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likes😂
0 likes@YM S arrivederci
0 likes@Sabrason I don’t remember what this comment thread was on. But I swear to God, if this is about Native Americans, ans you chose to call them squatters, we gonna have a problem
0 likes@Sabrason oh my God you were. It wasn’t up for grabs. They were using it. We took it from them. If you can recognize that at some point they took that land from other tribes, then you can also recognize that we conquered it. We didn’t just take land that was up for grabs. Nor do I need to be educated from a random man on the internet. You do not know my education level, and based off of the questionable language you used, I can tell your points are leaning towards prejudice more than fact
0 likes@Sabrason Ah. So you only believe if a government says so. Then only then it’s true. Societies existed before governments did. You seem to have no flexible understanding of human behavior. You must also believe that animals don’t claim territories since no government said so 🤡
0 likesI'll take an extra meatball amigo
0 likesYou're the type of dude who would ask criminals to kill you last and thank them for it.
1 like@Sabrason you’re just mad that you say gracias at Italian restaurant
0 likes@YM S Like Lt. Aldo pretending to be Italian talking to Hans Landa in Inglorious Basterds. “Reerbaderchi”
0 likesOr as he would say: The Eye-Talian restaurant.
1 like@Ricky Cairns that's the point
0 likesThat means that you think he is trying to help other people feel like they are at a restaurant in Italy, and not the United States. Even though "gracias" is a Spanish word, and not Italian, it's still the thought that counts.
0 likesOmg 😂😂 I lol’d
0 likesBruuuh 😂😂😂
0 likesHe probably also calls it “Eye-talian”
1 likeLmfaoo 🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭💀
0 likesArigato
1 likeOddly specific but I agree
0 likes@omerta jay you can’t decide what language people speak
1 likeWHAT 😂😂
0 likescan we not make jokes like this bcuz it humanizes him
0 likes@YM S aannnnd now he’s just Matt Damon in True Grit to me. Thanks.
0 likesSORRY TO BE SO DUMB. I WORKED IN ITALIAN RESTAURANTS AND NEVER HAD THIS HAPPEN..I DON'T UNDERSTAND , PLEASE EXPLAIN...
0 likes@YM S grahssy ahss
0 likesikr..... one of those!-
0 likes#eejit
And put ketchup on steak
1 likeBest comment ever
0 likesHahaha!
0 likesShit, i do that. But just to be facetious.
0 likesFor God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16❤️
0 likesFor God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16❤️
0 likes@Olivia Grace blah blah blah
1 like🤣😅😅😅
0 likesI think he'd just say "Gorlami!"
0 likesLmaoooo
0 likesOMG! My husband actually did that in Rome! When I told him he was in Italy not Spain I saw the waiter chuckle as he walk away. LMAO
1 like@Jules Asher 😄🌹
0 likes@Jeanne Miller You can use that against him ... for EVER :D
0 likesI’m dead
0 likes@spectrealangritch 😂😂😂😂😂
0 likesTHIS comment
0 likesLike 98% of 🇺🇸
0 likes@Ricky Cairns thats his point 🙌😂
0 likesLmfao
0 likesYou just gave me a laugh cramp
0 likes🤣🤣
1 likeRandom
0 likesWe’ve all been there, as Spanish and Italian are actually quite similar ( both languages are from the same origin, an evolution of Latin).
0 likesTo be honest some of the restaurant waiters are just as bad. Trying to give it that authentic feel by saying “Grazie” when you place your order, but it’s the only word of Italian he knows.
@Ricky Cairns yeah the joke is he would say it wrong
0 likes"Italian" restaurant. Where no one employed has ever been to italy, but are "Italian-american"
0 likesOr at a French restaurant.
0 likes🤣 LMFAO...
0 likes@Ricky Cairns Yes, that's the joke.
0 likesi do that whenever i feel like it really
0 likes😂😂😂😂😂
0 likes@Ricky Cairns thank you, you spared me the effort of correcting the error:)
0 likesHe probably lives in a Doomsday Bunker living off of rust riddled beans in a can.
1 likeThe interrogation here is extremely impressive in my opinion. At first I bought the cops' act as they were being friendly and polite to the suspect and I was horrified, before I realized they were acting exactly how they needed to to get Drejka to talk. I bought their act totally in the beginning.
3 likesAlso, I'm not surprised by the verdict at all. The defence attorney's closing statements to the jury was downright insulting to their intelligence.
He's on the ground after being shoved by the other man, when he positioned himself to reach for his pistol, from his point of view, it could look like the other man was advancing on him. The view distance shortens from in the lying position to the position he was in when he fired. Threatening other people with a gun? This to me could mean he wanted to feel dominant over others & got a thrill out of freaking people out?
6 likesIf the other guy got shot, but not fatality, then I would be in favour of the gunman, but he gave no warning that he was armed & the gunshot through the lung & heart was a precision shot. The gunman was looking for trouble & to find any excuse to use his weapon. How would you react if you were blind sided & you hit the ground hard? Through the shock, he fired with anger. If the black guy only kept things verbal, then maybe, all this would of only been a recording of a heated argument. It's unfortunate how things played out.
Replies (1)
He started this entire travesty upset about someone illegally parked when he himself was illegally parked. The guy was back away after the pushed because he saw he had a deadly weapon. As the guy is turning away or running away he shot him, it’s not self defense at that point.
0 likesThe worst part is that this guy could have just swallowed his pride, got up, and walked away and then press charges for assault if he wanted.
1 likeThis case teach us a lesson never physically push or assault anyone because you never know if they have any weapon.
6 likes“Negative” “neutralize the threat” “force multiplier” okay buzz lightyear
25343 likesReplies (215)
LOL
328 likesLOOL
151 likestake my like
236 likesHe sounds like he harbored secret desires to be a cop, and went around acting like he was one.
1469 likesMA ‘AM LMAO
65 likesAnd now "affermative" Sir, you're gonna be neutralized, and put behind an iron bars force demultiplier device called prison.
611 likesBrendan with honor
10 likesRuben75today not a force DEmultiplier 😂 bet he’s never heard of that one
19 likes@Fal go listen to the dark daddy. He is the dæmon king. And he is in nyc. All the rappers bow to him. Jay z learned about "do what thou wilt" from the dark prophet in brooklyn... And now the dark prophet has a youtube. Yay! God poured fire into his brain... And now, the angels bleed onto his feet. The dæmons cry tears of fire onto the dark prophets forehead. Jesus forces the dark prophet to drink his blood. NYC bows down to him now, he has collected all the spirits of covid 19 deaths....
4 likesHe used dark occult brujeria to take these souls. Now go to him. Love him. His beauty will destroy heaven forever. Amen æl dimm thaRR
White Alliance bro you’re terrifying please take this mumbojumbo dark fire daddy sh!t elsewhere. Over here sounding like you’re gonna be the main subject of JCS’s next video.
252 likes😂😂😂👏
8 likesbro I'm dying. didn't expect to find something funny in a murder case video lmfao
35 likes@White Alliance LOL
24 likes😂😂
1 like🤣
1 likeMore like Bud Lightyear
49 likesCoupolitics gotta lighten the mood somehow 😂
6 likesShe had the nerve to say, “okay buzz light year”.
10 likesI-....... 💀😂
💀💀💀💀
3 likes😂😂😂
2 likesWhite Alliance a bro chill
21 likesHe had to make it sound good for his movie directed by Clint Eastwood lol
11 likes“I then had to extract my hand” lmao
25 likesYou mean - buzz lightjail
5 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesLooL
0 likesOr John Correia lol
1 likeFal exactly! Like who tf does he think he is ?!?
4 likes😂😂😂😂
1 likethese people talk like that all the time
5 likes@Walker word delusional
1 likeThat’s fucking hilarious.
5 likesFal 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesLol
0 likes@Fal 👏😂
1 likeNah lmfaooooo
1 likedon’t disrespect buzz like that😡😡
8 likesHahahaha
0 likesYea, he got carried away on some of his training courses.
2 likesHe was hoping to sound like one of the guys.
6 likes🤣🤣
0 likesFal guy probably watches ASP
2 likesSarah Wilson What do you mean
0 likes“Black areas”?
OutlastU 2 low income and high in crime
0 likesLmao
0 likes😂
0 likesHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
0 likesBAHAHAHAHA....I fucking knew he sounded familiar 🤣😂🤣😅🤣😂...I'm dead!!!
3 likesThe million dollar comment.
3 likes@Smart Alix Soldier more like it.
1 like@BaconNDCheese yeah I carry and have been to classes plus I’m military so I’m definitely familiar with the use of those terms, but it sounds more like he is just pulling those words out of his vocabulary simply to impress the cop.
16 likesHAHAHAHAHAHA
0 likesGood one
0 likes😂😂oh shitt
1 likeLooool
1 like😂😂
0 likesLol the negative makes me feel like hes wannabe military/cop, but force multiplier and neutralizing the threat are accurate terms in force analysis. too bad for him his time spent studied force analysis didn't seem to get through in his 20+ years of firearm carrying 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
3 likes😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
0 likesholy shit my sides, going to use this later for sure
1 like*lightear
0 likesMan couldn't fight for real so he just played hero instead
3 likes"Force multiplier" is this term seriously used? xD
1 likeLol even the detective was like: what do you mean neutralize? ... lmao what a joke
3 likesThese are very common terms in armed self defense lessons and groups, however it seems the only information he retained from them was how to sound knowledgeable about self defense
6 likes@Joseph DiGiovanni that’s the joke. nobody uses technical terms like that outside of training purposes. I’m in the military but I don’t go around talking like homeboy did during his interrogation 💀 he just wanted to sound high speed for the cop so he could get a taste of his boot.
3 likesHahaha
0 likes🤣
0 likesMadness is badness
0 likesNo kidding 🙄🤮
0 likes@Soldaggi ain’t reading all that nonsense, homie. Happy for you tho. Or sorry that happened.
5 likesHAHA
0 likesGreat analogy
2 likes💀💀
0 likesHahaha😂🤣😂🤣 Dead AF!
1 likeYeah, and he shot that dude to infinity and beyond
0 likesAndy won't be playing with Mr Drejka anymore. Ew.
2 likesHe thinks the police officers are his friends lmao
1 likeLol
0 likes@Ruben75today LMAOOOOOOO
0 likesTo infinity and beyond
0 likes@Krisztián This reply im making is just a mark to see if an argument starts. Please ignore this reply
0 likes@Fal is u
0 likescool hair
0 likesTango down
0 likes@Ricardo Pesenti spent 20 in military.
2 likesYes it's an actual term.
Force additive like rearm and resuply.
Force subtractive. Wounded soldier or damaged equipment.
Force multiplier: medics hood comms situational awareness stuff.
Force divider. Wounded soldiers psy ops the like.
I've only encountered force multiplayer, when referring to weapons, be used to describe LMGs or SAWs. Recently it's been applied to squad deployed drones (aka raven) but that's an situational awareness platform.
I might have remember it being used in some self defense video or another though I'm not sure about that.
I personaly use negative when talking to people now adays.
Also say again roger Wilco(mostly on text)
I think I might have used a few others.
Luckily for me I d9nt have a career with threats in them so no need to say neutralize a threat.
Military prefers this term as it dosent automatically mean kill, taking control of a guy that drops his ak is neutralized, just as his budy who did not so got a chest full of freadom.
Its main purpose is as a reminder that killing shit ain't the only way to deal with it.
This guy is a turd he hyped himself up with that fire arm and training. Thinking he's an operator and shit.
@Fal imma be honest. What my boy White alliance is saying ain’t wrong
0 likes@spectrealangritch other than the part where he’s talking about love the demon he right. There’s people in power who do demonic stuff
0 likes@Bryan Wood this is the perfect name for them. Thanks, I’ll be stealing that.
2 likesThat’s the typical law enforcement euphemistic vernacular, clearly your vocabulary is low.
2 likes@Matt ‘The 1 in 26-1’ Hamill okay buzz lightyear
7 likes@Fal I don’t understand how speaking formally with the use of literary devices is an insult. Only the uneducated with learning deficiencies would say so.
3 likesHes one of those guys 🤦🏾♂️
1 likeGo vote for Bernie
0 likes@CarlosTheTrueDragon I’m gonna be real with you bro, this is neither the right time nor the right place 💀 but thanks I think
1 like@Drew Luoma I’m making fun of a murderer how is this political 😂
1 like@Matt ‘The 1 in 26-1’ Hamill take it easy on the thesaurus, homeboy. We get it, you want to sound smart. I’m knowledgeable about these terms he’s using, I’m in the military and I’ve taken classes for carrying. The thing that’s hilarious to most of us is the fact that he’s using them as if he’s an instructor teaching a class to the cop. You can tell he’s one of those people (much like you, apparently) who likes to use vocabulary like that to impress people. Meanwhile, he just killed a guy and the terms he’s using have nothing to do with justifying the murder.
4 likes@FalI learned what euphemisms were and the definition of vernacular in the 8th grade. Again, thinking I’m “trying to sound smart” because of one sentence I wrote is indicative of some sort of learning deficiency. That’s something a child would say to an adult when he’s frustrated and can’t interpret what the adult said. I won’t even dignify a response to your attempt at throwing me into the same crowd as the murderer.
1 likeYou know he prolly dresses up as him every Halloween 💀
0 likes@Smart Alix MY THOUGHTS EXACTLY
0 likesLMFAOOOOOO
0 likesPFFFT
0 likesHe wants to be a racist cop so bad he’s so trigger happy
1 likeSounds like a killer to me
0 likes@White Alliance ... ok
0 likes@Fal you lit 😆
0 likes😂😂
0 likes@Fal divider
0 likes@Ruben75today
2 likesiron bars force demultiplier has to be the funniest combination of words possible in this context
@Yami C that man is in a whole other world of his own completely detached from reality 😂😂😭
1 likeFunniest comment i have seen in a long while.
1 like@Brendan m kon moooonm kk mmkmonnnnooooknoooooooooo
0 likesThis comment smells like reddit🤢🤮
0 likesBuzzed Lightbeer
0 likes@DPS Cloud ta
0 likesLmao
0 likesFOR REAL the way he talks is so fucking bizarre. I cant imagine seeing the world in this way
2 likesI mean......he was delusional......fell with style and everything
0 likes😭
0 likesTacti-cool language from YouTube gun lovers. I've met many of them. It's an attempt to sound military and esoteric, in my opinion it instantly shows when a person is a gun but.
1 like🤣🤣🤣🤣I CANT
0 likesNOT BUZZ LIGHTYEAR I--
0 likesBYE!
😂😂😂😂😂
0 likesLol
0 likesif sniffed-his-own-farts was a verb... "I know, you have my absolute word, sir...", he SHOF'd.
1 likethis fucking cragked me so much wtf
0 likesHe sounds like me when I watch too much Active Self Protection
0 likes@Fal lmao
0 likes@IceJJFish Archive lmfao i love you for this, thank you
1 likeLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 likes“Tango down”
0 likesSTOOPP🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesLMAO
0 likeslol
0 likes@BeyondTheCamera the only person you shall promote is the youtuber named " share his vision". Now, silence. Know your place fool.
0 likes😂
0 likesHe's the kind of guy who wanted to be a police officer before he realizes that it requires work And isn't what it is on Tv
1 likeLike he want to be seen as someone on the same level as the police. "someone who talks like this clearly knows his stuff and can't possibly have done something wrong"
0 likesLMAO HAHAHHAA
0 likesWHY IS THIS TAKING ME OUT OLEASEEE
0 likesSounds dead on like a youtuber trying to stay within the youtube guidelines.
0 likes🤣🤣
0 likes@Ruben75today you got me rolling on the ground
0 likes😂😂😂
1 likeTalking about his specific vocabulary (which is being properly used) is totally irrelevant to the case itself, but yeah, I guess people need to feel better by making fun of someone else, as long as the person has a negative image, it's not bullying anyway haha
1 likeWheezing.
0 likes@Fimmt mate he just murdered a man who died at his child’s feet.
1 likeHim being bullied is the least of anybody’s concern.
@mark de rozairo it's not about him, mate, it's about one's lame attitude
0 likesUGH it's so bad 😷😷
0 likes@Fimmt Well it definitely is about him since the person is talking about him while watching him.
1 likeIt’s not as if his taking the piss out of an innocent child with learning difficulties the guy is a murderer.
Yes, that does sound pretty dumb. Besides, everybody knows it is negaTRON. Not "negative"
0 likes@mark de rozairo so? How is his vocabulary any relevant to what he's done? You clearly don't get the point here..
0 likes@Fimmt I believe it’s because he is trying to speak to the police officers in a way that makes him look as though he is as “qualified as them” or “he is one of them” as if he is knowledgeable but he really is not and it makes him look absolutely ridiculous.
0 likesPolice ask for a simple yes and no not a “negative” and he sounds like a twat.
It’s cringe and everyone (except you) finds it hilarious.
I love the fact he was convicted of murder even though he thought the police were on his side due to his buzz light year terminology as OP suggested.
Apparently “negative” doesn’t exempt you from the hideous murder charge of killing an unarmed black man infront of his wife a child.
I’m sure he will get over being called a twat on YouTube.
But will his child ever get over that image? I doubt it.
Your focused on the wrong thing here.
lol. If he didn’t have a gun he wouldn’t have even said anything to the woman in the car.
0 likes@Fal hahaha lol
0 likesLMAO
0 likestrying to sound smart lmfao
0 likes@MilkyWay2001 Trying to sound like a marine, cop or a soldier is what it is.
0 likesThose are actual therms, but they are generally spoken about in a martial context, it's really weird to hear this kind of jargon in an alleged self-defense
1 likeThe guy was out for blood, peace was never an option.
that is actually such a smart quip I am at a loss for words
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likesYears of academy training wasted
0 likes😂
0 likesCouch Commando in Lazy Company
1 likeGlad youre so informed on self defense law...
0 likes@nickoloes I am, thank you. Get bent. ❤️
0 likesYeah he’s a Cringelord
0 likesDon't forget "threat"
0 likes@Smart Alix he wanted to be a marine
1 likeI cannot 😅
0 likes😅😅😅😅
0 likes💀💀💀💀💀
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likesBut why are you so beautiful
0 likes@Fimmt are you really trying to guilt trip me for making fun of a murderer? 💀
0 likes@Fal I never meant anything about guilt, that's your take on it, I personally think it's irrelevant and basic to try to make fun about someone's correct/fitting vocabulary, regardless of who the person is.. I probably wouldn't use those terms myself, but if someone feels comfortable by doing it, then I don't really mind all that much as long as they are properly used. If the guy really tried to "impress" the interrogator, thinking correct manners would somehow counteract the crime he committed, that's just poor reasoning on his behalf..
0 likesGirl bye!😭👌🏾
0 likes'SNAP'
0 likesHis arm sure loosened up once he got into talking.
1 likewhats fals snap tho
0 likesHow dare you soil the good name of Space Ranger Buzz Lightyear of Star Command
0 likesLOL
0 likesLMFAO
0 likesSo many simps here lol
1 like@nix2025 Right 💀 And under a murder investigation vid no less
0 likesMarry me
0 likesWatched too many cop shows on tv
1 like"Neutralize the threat" is legalese, but saying it that way is a dead giveaway. You don't ever say you shot them to kill them. That's confessing to intent to kill. You say you shot to end the threat to yourself. "Neutralize the threat" is usually how this is explained in technical terms, so he's obviously read somewhere that he's supposed to say that and not realized that if you start quoting legalese at cops they're going to be like "...".
0 likesYooooo oh my god that’s perfect
0 likes“I’m not going to prison... I’m falling from grace with style !”
0 likesWhen you take CallOfDuty seriously
0 likes@Ricco Story son?
0 likesCrazy has arrived
0 likesWhats ur insta
0 likesLOL!!
0 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesI use some of those words but not negative. Im also prior military so it's just how I was taught how to shoot and the lingo stuck with me. This guy is acting like he is some hero that the cops should look up to.
1 like@CoolestBean 😎 shit if someone drew a gun on me I'd probably run. I carry but I'd rather not shoot someone. I'm capable of it but I don't want that. Granted I've also deployed and I can go into shooting mode but I don't want to kill anyone. Unless I can't run and it's my only option I'd rather not shoot someone.
1 likeMain takeaway: I never want to be in a position to shoot someone, the dude in the video wanted to be in a position to shoot someone.
@Fal I was thinking the same shit, he learned some lingo and thought he could dazzle the cops with his bullshit.
1 like@bucko fazoo LMFAO
0 likes@IceJJFish Archive he tried to dazzle people with his brilliance, now he is gonna baffle us with his bullshit.
2 likes@Smart Alix it was "his store", that's why
0 likes@Matti O Yeah, I think that's the real distinction. You can usually tell the actual military and police types from the wannabes because the former are usually humble about it while the latter act like they're Batman and everyone should respect them for it.
2 likes@Homer Simpson I appreciate the feedback, homer. I’ll work on that next time.
0 likeslmao buzz lightyear
1 likehe's like robocop if he had a broken calculator as his operating system
LMFAOO
0 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likes@White Alliance what are you talking about? You sound like you’re having a problem.
0 likes@Hailey Hayes sorry to burst your bubble princess, but theres 249 comments here, i dgaf about whatever you are talking about here. At this point i cant even remember what this thread is about, so... why are you important again?
0 likesNOOOO LMAO
1 likeDude we did not have the same thought just now no way
0 likesLmfao. Buzz lightyear to the rescue!
0 likes🤣😅🤣😅
0 likeseven the interrogator was like, “talk normal bruh”.
1 likeTacklebury
0 likesBuzz Lightyear 😂😂😂 I'm dead 😂😂😂
0 likesonly 20 years? that is so low for what he did wtf
3 likesBest DA ever. Very well thought out.
0 likesI would be ashamed if that was my dad. I would never want to see him or hear him ever again. Feel sorry for his kids.
0 likesHe greets those officers like he's expecting a medal for shooting a black man.
3 likesThis guy was so confident that he wouldn’t be charged.
2535 likesReplies (100)
@samuel cooper c’mon dude,look at America....I’d say that’s a pretty damn good “assumption”
281 likes@carly jeffrey what America are you talking about? No data support that stupid racist assumption and anti-White racism is the norm. It's disgusting. Let's stay with facts and not blm propaganda.
134 likes@CiskyFCC lol go pick up a football nerd.
125 likes@Bigdumbhorsebaby no he thought it was self defense, don’t bring race into it weirdo
35 likesAssuming everything is because of racism is really close minded.
53 likes@carly jeffrey Ye, I was. :thumbs up: ppl really gotta be blind to deny how much race plays into just... the history of America. :/ (Sorry if it seemed I was saying it to you, youtube comments are weird.)
19 likes@Icy Blackout LMAO??? So shooting someone who just push u on the ground is somehow self defense. Just say ur racist and get out of here.
22 likes@xeonic man... I guess when I get really weird looks from old white women it means nothing :)
7 likesOr I guess when old white men will say something incredibly racist and then look over me and smirk it means nothing :) thanks!
In fact you just solved racism! Hooray!
@Rob Wolfley There will always be ignorant people
4 likes@Terry Fulds Gaming Okay, so people who punch a bully who cornered them should be suspended?
5 likes@Bigdumbhorsebaby He might have shot the dude partly due to his race, but I doubt he would be any less fearful of getting jail time due to the race of the victim. That is a strange way of thinking.
5 likes@Terry Fulds Gaming What the hell do SJWs have to do with any of this?
5 likeshonestly if it was the 60's to even possibly the 90's he likely would have gotten off
1 like@CiskyFCC YOU ARE SO CORRECT
1 like@carly jeffrey What about america is racist in CURRENT TIME (2021)?
5 likes@carly jeffrey obviously it wasn’t a good assumption because he got 20 years.
0 likesI don’t get why while do the same argument every time. It’s true racist will never admit they’re openly admit they’re racist so even if you say to get statistics look at what happened at the jazz game I’m pretty sure those guys tried saying they weren’t racist after saying some stupid shit that would get your teeth knocked in.
0 likesWell that's the way it went down originally suprisingly the Sheriff was not charging him and said it was a fair use of stand your ground, but the District Attorney saw otherwise which was the right decision I think.
6 likesThis is one of these cases where people use as an excuse to kill people and it's a test of the law and there wasn't enough of a threat to justify a shooting. This stand your ground law needs to be more restricted and clearly defined with a minimum threshold like 'fear for your life or life of others'.
It should be where a person is brandishing a weapon or doesn't back away when you draw your gun or someone breaks into your property. Even then you've got to give a warning and chance for the perps to back off. Taking someones life or firing at such close range should really be a last resort. If he had fired a round off by the guys feet he would have backed off I bet and still be alive today.. so I think this guy misused this law.
@Baconside i was so agressive💀im so sorry,got triggered 4 a second😭
0 likes@Icy Blackout even if he wasn’t racist he definitely wasn’t defending himself. A real man won’t bring a gun to a fist fight
2 likes@I_Am_Asian_But_It_Doesnt_Mean_Im_Better_Than_You ! It's is legally not self defense indeed but i can not assume racism even when i would like to assume it because outside of how he looks i do not really have other information about the guy that could say he is racist. The way he talks about things he seems to be a person that is not in control of his anger whenever something is out of place for him.
3 likes@Bigdumbhorsebaby Pretty sure you need to be a cop to get that type of privilege
1 like@Bigdumbhorsebaby that’s the exact opposite of reality, when someone who is white shoots a black person there’s usually media coverage and people throwing accusations that the white dude is racist and killed the black person unjustifiably...
2 likes@Bigdumbhorsebaby True, anyone that thinks black people are disadvantaged in the court room is an idiot. It had nothing to do with the skin color.
3 likes...most of them feel that way.
0 likesI'm wondering (as a European) if a deep imprinted racism could be behind this belief he wasn't guilty. (no BLM adept).
0 likes@carly jeffrey the opposite is true
0 likes@Koen G more likely he felt justified due to the initial assault by the husband, probably enraged, and thereafter he felt he had a strong “self defence” argument so he was safe. But as a fellow European, (Balkans, so even less familiar with white racism than Western Europe), I don’t know anymore. Everything American is somehow made about race so I just choose to not participate in most discussions anymore lol
6 likes@Terry Fulds Gaming Glad he is spending his time in Jail, he is a weak little criminal.
1 like@Bored_ Person YES if the bully dies from it.
0 likes@Baconside No argument. Resorts to Reddit-level insults.
1 like@xeonic especially when your entire reason behind calling the person racist is because they're in fact, a different color🤦♂️😂
1 like@carly jeffrey why'd you put quotations around assumption? Are you implying that he/she wasn't assuming that he's racist?🤨
1 like@Victor S Once again, you're all hypothetical and no facts. Cant even answer a simple question.
0 likes@Bigdumbhorsebaby not because it's very close to being justified if he was any more violent it probably would have been self-defense
0 likes@I_Am_Asian_But_It_Doesnt_Mean_Im_Better_Than_You ! that's racist man
0 likes@mutz dude the only reason he wasn't justified is because his own words showed that he wasn't in fear of his life he paused and then decided to shoot if this situation was different and he truly was in fear which could have happened then he would have been justified
0 likes@Johnny MF still can't understand that u can't be racist to those who made the racist system.
0 likes@silas guzman it would’ve been worse probably cuz no cameras
0 likes@I_Am_Asian_But_It_Doesnt_Mean_Im_Better_Than_You ! of course you can
1 likeWhy did he got charged isn't self defense
0 likes@Patrick Huyghe ...And mostly the bully wins. There’s a reason why they’re the bully.
0 likes@YumiGacha Poor baby have to deal with bad stares of "old white men". Not women. Not middle aged. Only old white men. You're so credible. That's racism to you? Go in a ghetto by being white, and you'll see that staring wouldn't be your bigger problem. Watch tv and see a lesbian black mayor of a city being openly racist and getting away with it.
0 likes@Rob Wolfley an accusation doesn't prove itself. You have no argument.
0 likes@Bigdumbhorsebaby why do you race bait? It's so sad and pathetic
2 likes@CiskyFCC white people racism is not only directed towards blacks but also towards other ethnicities. Racism is deep rooted in American society. Pick up any American newspaper and you'll see most of the pages filled with diatribe against other people. Denigrating non democratic governments as barbaric, depicting asian men as feminine, forcing western values on others and intervening in middle East these things are racism too. American laws are targetted towards blacks. Just because a country has woman president doesn't mean the country is feminist or favourable to women.
1 likeMaybe that black woman was afraid the white man would twist her words to suit his own agenda.
We do not need data or evidence for something which is in front of our eyes.
@CiskyFCC why are you telling me that?
0 likes@CiskyFCC you aint the sharpest knife in the drawer, are ya?
0 likes@Lise Beeston There is no systemic racism in america, and THAT is a FACT. Definition of systemic racism is "systemic racism, is a form of racism that is embedded through laws and regulations within society or an organization. It can lead to such issues as discrimination in criminal justice, employment, housing, health care, political power, and education, among other issues" Now, EXACTLY what law or regulation within society is racist? Hint... you wont find one because it DOES NOT EXIST.
1 like@Rob WolfleyWow, imagine claiming a country is racist and not being able to articulate reasons why you think it is. "Look around" are you serious? Give me facts as to how america is racist. "Look around" doesnt mean crap all.
1 like@Michiah Ruby hahaha once again. Another reply from you STILL not explaining how america is racist. I have done my research which is why i know that America is not racist. You have given me absolutely no facts as to how america is racist. I specifically asked you like 3 times "how is america racist in 2021" It as if you're completely ignoring the 2021 part. Because you keep on saying how america was built on racism. Which is passed tense, and not 2021. You're side stepping the question and not answering based off of what I said. I say 2021 you talk about 1950s.
1 likeMustve thought he was a cop or somethin.
0 likes@Rob Wolfley I had to write something like "I can't wait until ignorant people like you no longer exist" or "stfu. Look around" to be "sharpest knife in the drawer", right? Nice arguments.
1 like@carly jeffrey if America is so racist, then why did this guy get charged for the shooting?
2 likes@carly jeffrey when was the last time in America a black man was killed by a white man and it wasn't just nationwide but world wide news?
1 likeYeah because he was innocent
0 likes@CiskyFCC So how should I refer to white people? Call them Pink people or what? There's a lot of politics behind all these progressive stuff like feminism and stuff I don't want to talk about them right now. But what right do you have to tell a country to become democratic feminist and tolerant? Who gave you right to intervene in other countries internal matters? LHBT and fedos might be seen as civilized high people in American society, but other people do not hold them in high regards why must you then force them to tolerate and promote these people just like you do? White values should be confined to white societies is all I'm saying. I'm not calling America a civilized country, you assumed, because of your inherent racism, that just because I disapprove of American values I must be an uncivilized person and American values are right and civilized! You just proved my point!
0 likesBottom line as a human being with a soul you have to know that even though I was shoved to the ground by someone that is obviously not a threat once I have my weapon drawn on him to leave well enough alone, he clearly was looking for a confrontation and he achieved his goal. Unfortunately it resulted in someone dying in front of their children. As a human you have to understand that.
0 likes@I_Am_Asian_But_It_Doesnt_Mean_Im_Better_Than_You ! wait its not?? genuinely curious
0 likes@Terry Fulds Gaming look how many steps the black guy takes back, it’s not like he was going in to shit kick the white dude.
0 likesHmmm sounds like some people here voted for trump
0 likes@Terry Fulds Gaming this was in no way self defense when they guy had a gun against an unarmed man. Period. Your feelings have no jurisdiction here, it is the law. Learn to understand that this is a crime and how you interpret that crime and how it makes you "feel" is beyond irrelevant.
0 likes@Static Gaming thumps up man. its rare to see a thinking person
0 likes@carly jeffrey "good assumption" lol tell that to all the democrat city's
0 likes@CiskyFCC cry my a river. "it's soooo hard to get made fun of for being white online. wahhhh"
0 likes@Bigdumbhorsebaby that's the most racist comment I have ever read
0 likes@V An unarmed person can in fact inflict grievous bodily harm or death. Which means under the right circumstances shooting an unarmed person is justifiable. There are literally dozens of cases over the years that set a precedence. The man in the video was judged by a jury of his peers so justice was met. However that doesn’t change the fact that an unarmed person can be a huge threat and people have been cleared of all charges when faced with such a threat. No matter how you feel about it that doesn’t change the law.
0 likesbecause he was white and the victim was black
0 likes@CiskyFCC compared to your no argument at all? I'll take it.
0 likesPeople just wanna bring race into everything, huh.
0 likes@Barnacleshould we pretend everyone is gray and that no one has any prejudices?
0 likes@carly jeffrey yeah and look at black people shoving white guys over an argument he was having. He started it. The white guy just used too much force. Black guy brought it on himself. Guy was responsible in only shooting one bullet. He didn’t try and kill the guy
0 likes@Rob Wolfley You got that entire sentence from a simple remark. If that isn't a straw man, then I don't know what is.
0 likes@Barnacle It was a question.
0 likes@Rob Wolfley Uumm, and? Not sure what that has to do with anything.
0 likes@Barnacle yeah, real tough question. I wouldn't answer either.
0 likes@YumiGacha He didn't say racism means nothing. He said assuming every single thing happens because of racism is a close-minded approach. I don't see how this is a surprising, never told before fact to you people. Not everything is about race.
0 likesBruh I have no idea what the top commenters are saying because the could mean anything
0 likes@Annie Skywalker Absolutely stupid way of thinking. Fist fight puts your life in danger even more if you lose. A gun ends the altercation all together. He shouldnt have shot, but he had every right to pull it out and force the attacker to back off. If they made any aggressive movements towards him then he had the right to shoot. Saying a rEaL mAn should have engaged in physical violence is toxic masculinity which goes to show how toxic of a person you are.
0 likes@Bigdumbhorsebaby 💯
0 likes@Terry Fulds Gaming just because you are intimidated by a larger man does not mean you can kill him. He got pushed which yeah is crime but his life isn’t in danger. Proper procedure would for him to have drawn his gun and told the man to stay back. People panic and make stupid decisions like shoot a man for just pushing you. This is manslaughter, and an example of what exactly not to do when you have a sidearm.
1 like@Dee K and get your groups out of Australia, And America Since Natives had peaceful trades with Africa and established routes and settlements before erupeans got here
0 likes@Dee K And make sure you take your covid19 with you
0 likes@Dee K Actually in truth Eropa isn't even your land. You stole that from an ancient Dark indigenous peoples.
0 likesEdit : as far as evidence goes you guys might not even be from this planet. the people from the ice were dark too. Even though your ancient historians claim to be from the ice mountains
@Bigdumbhorsebaby He was right. It took almost a month for him to be arrested and he was only charged with manslaughter.
0 likesin 1 day you have gotten more likes and replies in my years on youtube ):
1 like@Terry Fulds Gaming He shoved him because he was yelling at his wife. Is he not supposed to protect his family. He didn't even chase him after he shoved him. Mike pulled the gun out and he backed up further and he shot him. That's murder.
0 likes@carly jeffrey Statistics don't support systemic racism actually.
0 likes@Aquarius Coconut Derek only got trialed because if he didn't those riots might have continued. If there wasn't a media shitstorm he might not even be in prison at all.
0 likes@Michiah Ruby Its lovely to see you explain why media love to cover events where a white person(mostly a cop) shoot a black person, because they know they can get naive people riled up and so they get a lot of money from the clicks, one example of that is MaKhia Bryant’s shooting, a very obviously justifiable shooting that needs no coverage at all, but they still decided to cover the story and make the black person sound like the poor victim that was just a young girl that did tik toks about makeup knowing that the stupid people will buy any story that pushes the narrative of systemic racism and cops are bad, even though the girl was a criminal that tried to literally stab someone infront of a cop...
0 likesAnd lemme clarify what I meant about media coverage of these events, the rate at which the media covers shootings that involve a white person shooting a minority(mostly black) is much higher than the opposite where a minority shoots a white person which is very obvious since they like to cover the shootings where they can attach racism to the story and they can’t do that only if the shooter is white because thats how they make money through the naive people that push the story further.
the detectives sound sympathetic toward the victim. they know he shouldn't have been shot.
0 likes@Alex M. you people?
0 likes@Dee K right because you speak for all. I just wanted other people to see how fake that whole line of thinking is. You did your part. Thank you for your level of intelligence broski.
0 likes@YumiGacha Ughh... The person I responded to and the people who think like him?
0 likesGotta work on that reading comprehension buddy.
@Dee K your group won't even consider fixing damages and accountability lol. But ya go try you have my blessing
0 likes@Dee K ya no, thieves don't make demands first
0 likesHe wasn't charged at the first time actually, he got charged after the pressure from the BLM mafia. "Uuuhh.. there were no blacks in the judge", that was enough to put him in jail. That's how USA works now, without common sense.
1 likeI believe it was racism too. He was extra scared because it was a black man. It's ridiculous.
0 likesI mean, he shouldn't have been.
0 likes@James Shepherd and girls who manipulate boys into killing themselves shouldn't go to jail either, after all they didn't touch anyone right? The boy committed the act on his own . That's your logic. Sick people who manipulate situations without getting their hands dirty shouldn't go to jail or prison. That's what the police proved. Was he really a concerned citizen or a jackass looking for a reason to pull a trigger. They got em
0 likesHe's moaning about his arm after he murdered this innocent man. 🙄🤬
1 likeNotice how his poor, lame arm has healed itself during the interview.
3 likesEvery time he says negative instead of no, it makes me think he’s someone who wants to me police or military. He’s been waiting for someone to give him a “reason” to shoot
1 likeReplies (2)
Wanna know the worst part. This guy would have been a self described "responsible gun owner" before this incident. I wonder how many more "responsible gun owners" there are out there that are just like this guy. Living their lives every day hoping for the day they get to use their gun.
3 likes@HamsterFromAbove exactly!!
0 likesHis arm got better fast...good recovery time...must have been that warm fuzzy feeling the detectives were projecting...
0 likesHe was getting into traffic confrontations all the way back in 2012 where people reported that he pointed a gun at them threating to shoot them. He confronted a truck driver who was parked in a handicapped spot and then called the company the guy worked for to report him and said he was lucky "he didn't blow the guys head off". Dude was just a ticking time bomb who was eventually going to shoot someone.
580 likesReplies (24)
And the US government does not take guns away from people. I really don't get it.
45 likes@Theuthras Thankfully. I would rather have a weapon to defend myself, rather than rely on the government to protect me and expect everyone to follow the law.
26 likes@H Hasslinger Why would you have to defend yourself with a gun if the other guy didn't carry a gun? Please explain.
37 likes@MrSimram America is built on the second ammendment, disarming everybody would be practically impossible I reckon. anti-gun laws work well for places like the UK (where I live) because its been that way for a long time and our history is nothing like americas. Got to admit there are some places here that make me feel like I need a force multiplier but I dunno, I think the general lack of firearms in the public makes me feel safer and I tend to avoid dodgy areas!
23 likes@MrSimram You don't seriously think guns are the only thing people attack others with?
17 likes@MrSimram what makes you think criminals follow gun laws lmao
19 likes@Carryhandle Enjoyer what makes you think that you will be the first person to shoot if the other party has malicious intent and a gun?
6 likes@MrSimram I'm talking about it in general, not this specific situation. The criminals will always find a way to get guns whether they are illegal or not. I'd rather have one to defend myself
1 like@Bangkok555 well, I know what youre saying, a lot of this seems to go down in London which is a complete shithole imo, luckily I live out in the country. knives etc? well Im a 6 ft 1 big ish bloke which seems to repel most evil-doers, not that I come across any where I live or go. If I had to go anywhere dodgy id take the proper precautions of course, but who needs the stress =D
0 likes@H Hasslinger people with weapons know they can’t fight 🤣 need something far range to defend yourself huh
1 like@Theuthras Just a thinking : a gun doesn't kill anyone, it's the person who pull the trigger that kills. I'm in Europe and, as a husband and father, I would like to have the right to protect my familly against criminals wanting to hurt or kill them. Instead of that , by the law, if I shoot a burglar armed with a knife in my own house, I will be put on trial. Legitimate defense would be me attacking him with a knife, proportionnality !!! Do you think it's fair ?
4 likesyeah, unfortunately it took to this point, but never physically altercate yourselves for a woman.
0 likesHearsay. Dismissed.
1 like@H Hasslinger Most people want gun REGULATION like in Canada, where I am. In Canada, it's ridiculously easy to get illegal weapons thanks to the US, yet we have way less gun crimes in proportion and way less crime in general. Requiring people to have a license to have a weapon isn't a big ask. It's easy and inexpensive to get a hunting rifle if you have good mental health and no criminal record. Same with a handgun. Sure, we can't have assault weapons but why do you need and ASSAULT weapon to DEFEND yourself? Do you expect 20 murderers to storm your house at once? Regulation just makes sure people who are untrained, irresponsible, mentally unstable or who have criminal motives have the least access to guns as possible. And as someone who has been suicidal multiple times, I'm very grateful for it.
3 likesthe lady also used double standards to make her husband assault an old guy, after they parked in a handicapped spot. everyone in the situation was annoying. were not talking abt this or that, red herrings n false conclusions used to sway the jury, im sure ppl could paint u as a terrible person too, n thats literally the job of the prosecution.
0 likes@HailRider well I'm in mexico and I wish we didn't have so much gun control because you're left with nothing to defend yourself. I can tell you a shotgun or hunting rifle would not be options to defend yourself here
1 like@Francisco Rojas I don't know why you are replying to me. I was addressing the original post with the non-verified accusations that have nothing to do with the case. Hence I say "Hearsay".
1 likeAs for mexico... Eric Holder and obama didn't send you enough guns? I know, its the same thing the dummycrats want to do in the USA. They want legal owners not to have them so only criminals will have them.
Every country I have been to have thriving black market arms dealers. You can get one if you want...especially in mexico. I suppose the problem you would have is that the police there are as corrupt as the politicians. We have the same problem here but currently the politicians are far more corrupt than the cops.
In mexico the criminals own the cops and policians.
In the USA the politicans are the criminals and they use civilina criminals to reign terror on the population and both are trying to own the cops.
@Carryhandle Enjoyer Yes
0 likes@Joseph B It's do defend against others with illegal weapons. Not everyone follows the law.
0 likes@Joseph B yeah people with guns cant fight thats why military personal carry guns cuz they cant fight. Thats why cop carry guns cuz they know they cant fight.
0 likes@Felix B You need to be registered to legally own a firearm in the U.S. as well. Also, assault weapon is basically a made up term to demonize the AR 15 since it's technically not an assault rifle. I think people want it because they would like at least some form of defense in case something crazy happens like a massive riot or something. It's happened plenty of times in history, so it's not crazy to be prepared for it in the future.
1 like@MrSimram Because other guy can carry a knife or bat or whatever. Or maybe there are 2 guys. Literally dozens of possible reasons.
1 likeCrack is illegal and people keep buying it......
1 like@MrSimram also guns can be purchased illegally you know that right
0 likesIf this guy was a cop it would be different.
1 likeI've seen plenty of videos of cops getting shoved and their first line of defense is their pistol.
Guy shouldn’t have been billy badass and pushed him from behind like that. I guess it goes both ways, things like this usually happen before the right decisions can be made. Tragedy all around
0 likesUnjustified. If the assailant was approaching him? As a juror, I would give him every benefit of the doubt. Victim was retreating.
0 likesthere is no punishment cruel enough for people like Michael Drejka.
4 likesThe way he calmly acts and even jokes with the police so early on.. He was so confident that he was going to be let off.
428 likesReplies (7)
He could have been. Narrator is right if he was firm on the self defense and afraid he was going to get stomped out there's a chance he may have been let off.
17 likes@DeadArmed Even if he argued that he believed he really was going to be beaten to death, the evidence speaks for itself... Markeis McGlockton had stepped back three times, and turned around, and during that part of the interaction, several seconds passed. These facts nullify even the most bold self-defense argument.
36 likes@sokami He may not have gotten off completely free, but I'm sure a decent lawyer could've gotten him a significantly more lenient sentence. People can over-react with extreme, irrational fear, which could've been the argument if Michael didn't casually ramble on to police for two hours. I mean, I don't think he was truly scared for his life when he pulled the trigger, but I'm also not convinced he truly wanted to just kill a guy. Although, it does seem from his history that he likes to look for conflicts and in this interview he shows his boldness is just due to his firearm. It's most likely that he finally got the encounter he "wanted" and just got tunnel-visioned into the scenario he always played out in his head and couldn't adapt when the scenario changed.
14 likes@Ricky Janzen Exactly. He was a wannabe 'Murican hero who deliberately went out of his way to find an excuse to shoot someone. No one in their right mind would believe he shot him out of fear after looking at the evidence. I mean, the guy even had a record prior to this.
9 likesYeah. Notice the self-defense jargon he uses. As if he is a responsible, trained gun owner. He's trying to equate himself to law enforcement.
5 likes@Ricky Janzen this. I don't know if many people are ever consciously walking around thinking to themselves "I'm gonna find a black guy and kill him first chance I get." it's probably a minimally conscious thought process, it's moreso a matter of patterns of behavior, aggression and racial bias all coming together to get them to pop off. I mean it is effectively "I'm a time bomb for a black guy to give me the chance" for these people, but a lot of them probably have no idea they are racist and aggressive.
2 likesI disagree. Those jokes were nervous and initiated by police to relax him into his eventual confession. His feigning an injury suggests he believed there would be doubt cast over his report. The police did a great job relaxing him to the point of confession.
2 likes7:49 The way he says "She took that as an affront" tells you everthing about this disgusting man. How dare a young, Black woman not do exactly as he said.
4 likes"The true victim" (who's pulled a gun on 2 other people) shot some one for shoving him. A natural reaction for a man who sees his wife being berated by another man.
3 likesLOL at the cop telling him he doesn’t know what “force multiplier” means. It just goes to the guy’s state of mind that he thinks he’s talking cop language, when the cop is just making him spell it out and sound like a weeb.
0 likes‘It’s not completely representative of what occurred” What does that statement even mean? I see a man walking backwards as he looks at his murderer.
0 likesSounds like he went around looking for trouble. This guy is the wannabe cop/soldier that was never good enough to be accepted.
1464 likesReplies (38)
Scary thing is that lots of these types actually are allowed to enter the U.S. police force . We get proof of that on a weekly basis .
64 likesNot "not good enough". Not sane enough, obviously.
8 likesAs if people who are accepted as cops are good people HAHHAhahah...
17 likes@EQH1 not all are bad. There are good men and women in uniform that genuinely care
16 likes@PaulLonden yes
0 likesExactly
1 likeGeorge Zimmerman anyone?
8 likes@PaulLonden weekly basis my ass lmao
1 like@Jeremy Jolivet lol what? The victim went out to defend his partner from this lunatic. Who's to say if he would have shot the woman before the victim pushed him?
25 likesPlus did you see the video? The victim, and a bystander both reacted simultaneously when the maniac pulled out his gun. The victim took a step back when he saw the gun, he was no longer a threat and the gun toting Yahoo didn't need to shoot.
He wanted to be a hero that day and start trouble. I stand by my comment.
@Jeremy Jolivet the fact that he’s out there yelling/going back & forth with a woman about a parking space at a business he doesn’t own. Safe to safe if he knew how to mind his business, none of that ever occurs. You don’t seem to grasp that concept though.
9 likesBut go ahead, go try it yourself, defend a parking space that doesn’t need your protection and see who loves you for it.
Also, funny how you forget to mention the other people that came forward confessing he pulled guns on them, so who’s to say he didn’t have that in mind as well had the man not shown up to protect his family from a lunatic with a gun 🤷🏾♂️
Sounds like it? He’s on video looking for trouble! He’s a guy with nothing better to do in his life than to enforce parking rules, something NOBODY asked him to do, and someone died because of it.
8 likesExactly what I thought. Wasn't his job to police anybody.
1 likeThe true crime here is all of the grammatical errors in the comment feed " ambarass" come on people... This guy was a lunatic looking to play a "hero".
1 like"Afferimitve sir"
1 like@Jeremy Jolivet the other gentleman was in the wrong but I dont think the situation called for deadly force
0 likesToo be fair the person who started the fight is the man who was shot, Michael is guilty of overreacting with deadly force to a non deadly threat. But the fact still remains he did not start the physical altercation.
1 likerepsandgrooves, today we call this a male Karen :P
2 likes@c allen. Sounds like you're wrong. 😂 I mean, look at my picture! I'm sure that I'm not black.. but ok.
1 like@Crystal P Thanks for your input, Ms. Grammar cop. Thank you. Oh thank you! 🥺
1 like@Derek aka Derek Yes it's wrong that they parked in a disabled spot, but that doesn't mean Marquis had to die for it. Drejka himself parked illegally. Plus Drejka was in no place to police it Brittany parking in a disabled spot. Either let the business know or, you know, call the actual police? This could have been resolved without anyone dying or going to prison for.
1 like@The Helghast did nothing wrong Drejka was loud and aggressive with Brittany. He was arguing with her about parking illegally while he parked illegally. Brittany's boyfriend was defending her, simple. If someone is in your partners face, being loud and aggressive, while your kids are present, what would you do? Drejka didn't need to shoot. Once he pulled out the gun, Marquis stepped back. He was no longer a threat.
1 like@Derek aka Derek "You're arguments"... Good grief... 🙄😂
0 likes@Covidescapeslvl4biolab-this mask will stop it Why so angry, Lucy? Relax. Drejka was aggressively arguing with Brittany about parking in a disabled spot while he himself had parked illegally.
2 likesSecondly, he was being loud and aggressive with Brittany while her kids were with her (according to witness accounts). All he had to do was be nice about it, "excuse me miss, do you mind moving your car as this is a disabled spot?" - if that doesn't work, notify the business owner or police. Marquis came out to defend her as Drejka was moving in closer and closer.
When Drejka pulled out his gun, Marquis immediately stepped back, as you said. Threat gone. No need to shoot.
Michael Drejka was in no place to police them for parking in the spot. That's not his job. He wanted to start trouble that day. If it wasn't them, it could have been someone else.
@repsandgrooves you mention 'agressively arguing' - That's not against the law actually. You can argue with words on an agressive tone and still do nothing wrong but being a nuisance maybe. The assault however was against the law.
0 likesWhy mention aggression when the man only used words, kept his distance from the car too...
Also just to make things clear where i stand: the shooting was unjustifiable and therefor manslaughter.
@repsandgrooves You cannot physical assault someone for yelling, the way I see it, the unarmed man escalated a verbal conflict to a physical conflict and the other man in turn escalated it from a physical conflict to a use of lethal force. Both men unnecessarily escalated the fight beyond what they were permitted to do under the law. If you play silly games and throw your weight around you are bound to pick a fight with someone willing it escalate things to the death.
0 likesHe played a silly game thinking because he was big he could assault people for offending him or yelling, and he paid the price. They both did and good riddance to them both.
Here in Australia we have laws called one punch laws, throwing someone onto the concrete on their back has killed many people here initiating these laws.
Don't down play what marquis did, he played games by shoving people around and it was just a matter of time before a person he shoved around was a coward willing to shoot him over it.
@repsandgrooves Day nachos! That is Greek for my kitty wants his pants.
0 likes@AwoudeX I agree that the push was an assault, but being in that moment where Drejka was close to his girlfriend, and with Drejka being loud-likely saying nasty things to her, a push probably saved her life, but cost him his. If a man was in my woman's being loud and aggressive to her, I'd push him hard, too.
0 likes@The Helghast did nothing wrong I'm Australian too, mate. I agree Marquis pushing Michael is an assault. But in that situation, a man much bigger than his girlfriend was being verbally aggressive, and moving in closer to the car. Who knows what Michael would have done to Brittany when she stepped out of the car? When Marquis came out and saw that, his first instinct would have been to distance Michael from her. I've been in situations where I've pushed others off my mates during a situation. Mate, in games of league punches flew, I tell you. But that happens in moments oh heat and adrenaline.
1 likeBoth men we're wrong in their actions, but Drejka pulling the trigger was very unnecessary. And he even parked illegally to have a go at then parking illegally. He just wanted trouble.
@AwoudeX heat of the moment, mate. Seeing a man much bigger than his girlfriend standing in her face would have trigger the response to push him away.
0 likesWe can clearly see that Marquis took a step back immediately after the gun was drawn. His reaction was simultaneous with the other person heading to their car. Once the gun was out, Marquis was no longer a threat. The trigger should not have been pulled.
I'm not saying Marquis pushing Michael was right. Neither was Michael in getting out of his car to begin the altercation. If Michael minded his own business, nothing would have happened. If people have a problem with illegal parking, report it. Simple.
@AwoudeX remember that Michael had pulled his gun on others before this incident. So he's not afraid to use his gun, and he wanted to use it. Watch the video again
0 likes@repsandgrooves 'heat of the moment'
0 likesthe dude stood so far away from the car that she could open the door easily and step out, what she did at the exact moment her man came into her vision. There was no threat, there was no heat of the moment except heated words and heated words aren't cause to start shoving people that are keeping their distance.
On one side you have this guy shoving without just cause and on the other side you have someone shooting without just cause. You defend the one and not the other. I'd like you on my side and defend neither. Shoving is an escalation of a verbal conflict into a physical one. In this case an eye for an eye made someone DEAD. Or more accurate a NOTHING for a SHOVE for a SHOOTING. One dead, one for the better part of the rest of his life to rot in prison and another robbed of the father of her children. Eliminate the shoving and you have NOTHING of all these escalations and nothing would have happened other than words exchanged.
Also he made it his business to call out bad behavior in others without immediately reporting it to the police. What kind of world do you want, where people always resort to the most draconic measure of involving the government in something what we as a society should be able to take care of just by ourselves? I mean what kind of dick parks there? No empathy for the disabled? I would have briefly adressed it as i would consider it everybody's business, including mine. I don't wanna live in a community where assholes get away with making life harder for the more vulnerable in society. You seem to skip over this part a bit. Probably a heat of the moment thing again, lol, disregarding everything because you never learned to controll yourself, which is VERY important if you want a civil society. This case clearly proves that much.
@repsandgrooves I've watched and i've been disgusted at the time it took between the shopper walking away and him pulling the trigger. It was ages in my opinion. Nobody would be able to safely drive a car if they would need that much time making decisions and estimating situations.
0 likesI also was well aware of him pulling his gun in other cases, however he had no history of shooting anyone and on top of that, it was holstered, so what point are you making here? Could the dead guy read his mind? Did he know him? More wild assumptions are welcome, i'm always up for some entertainment
@repsandgrooves You cannot physically assault someone for what "They might do" for the same reason he was arrested for shooting someone for what "he might do"
0 likesIf someone was physically assaulting his wife it would be a whole other dynamic.
The examples you gave you state punches flew, and in that case that is the right time to defend yourself or your loved ones, shoving someone onto their back because they are being verbal is not ok.
Again I am defending neither party, I am glad Michael went to prison and hope he enjoys his stay, but if you go around shoving people for stupid shit like arguing you are bound to meet someone like Michael or some wannabe hardass who is willing to take your life over it.
Same applies to road rage, yeah 99 percent of the time you might get away with it, but one day you will meet that person who will happily chase you down, run you off the road and then beat you half to death.
Blind siding the guy wasn’t really called for. Shooting him wasn’t justified at all. But touching another person based on there words to you is an escalation of a verbal altercation. Always try to deescalated. Worst thing that can happen is it doesn’t work but at least try.
2 likes@repsandgrooves he has dreamt of beeing a hero for sure, he thought of beeing a justicer this time but i still trust him partially, under panick he could have "seen" him move (that phantom puch you avoid in boxing sometimes when you take a hit). it's always easier to relive the moment and do the right actions afterward but in the moment it's always harder...
0 likesbut it still doesn't justify his actions, a hit to the knee or leg would have been kinda ok i guess but aiming to the chest and shooting with two had stabilized is clearly over intensive use of force...
to me the real problem is guns in the usa, with a knife it would probably not have been a manslaughter
Gift cards
0 likesOk let’s talk about how dumb the dead guy was ...
0 likesHow right you are. His daddy was a state trooper and he ended up being a tree trimmer.
0 likesthis shows exactly why gun ownership in the US is life-threatening!
1 likeI guess he doesn't realize there was a video of this ordeal happening.🤦♀️
0 likesGuilty Oct 2019 - sentenced to 20 years. Dec 2021, appeal denied.
0 likesthe fact that this all happened in clearwater, a place i go to very often and have wonderful memories of, is absolutely insane to me lol
0 likesThis is the “You’re disrespecting a future US ARMY soldier” kid all grown up.
9846 likesReplies (58)
@SeanPMLeviathen i wont let anyone with a ronnie coleman playlist but no significant amount of muscle mass tell me this.
39 likesNEGATIVE!!!
47 likes@SeanPMLeviathen Don't you have a beta uprising to lead somewhere ya big gay bear
47 likesWell, that escalated...err...weirdly.
81 likesThis is the kid that got on everybody's nerve and when he finally got a gun he was like, "Finally! You will respect me!"
100 likesBeyond Tribalism why lol
2 likesRe Tard sorry to engage with you mr. troll, but I’m genuinely curious about something. Is “moon cricket” a racial epithet or something you made up? It’s astonishing the amount of slurs people have cooked up over the years.
13 likesoh my god literally
2 likes@J H Lmao 0 to 100 real quick
2 likesGeoff Lambert it’s a long standing racial slur.
2 likes@SeanPMLeviathen he is a good pro more gun laws poster child. People in the state of Florida gun law. the Floridian ban
0 likes@Stephen Stalking kids, kids go to your rooms
2 likesDämon Figgah ok demon niggah
1 likeYou left out the part where didn’t actually get into the military
5 likesLink?
1 like.
0 likesoh nina, the perfect politic talk...plz raise your male kids or familys male kids
1 likenot to act like ''marquis'' and try to hit ppl hard enough to kill them when
they are old...hear too many of u talk cant do but will judge...
and that comment...sounds like the late late show on too many pills
and coke.. ''disrespecting ''what'?? nobody could have thought that up...
anyways..luck when somebody drags u into the car or something...
@gary c Its a reference to another video, Gar but thank you for your kind words
1 likeHAHA yooooo😆
1 likeWell it looks like we need to show a little more respect for this man
0 likesLol why do people always get butthurt over this comment
2 likesActually, that kid went and actually became a US soldier and I believe he did a tour. lol THAT KID is the legit shit. This dude aint shit compared to that future soldier. God bless him. lol
10 likesNegative sir 🤣
0 likesNeuronalAxon Agree 🤔😲
0 likesremember the -you're disrespecting a futur army soldier kid-?
3 likesthis is him now
feel old yet?
That kid actually is in the army now 😭😂
8 likesHilarious 😂
2 likesThat kid actually became a US Soldier ajdjakxk he's a great man, this man is not XD
6 likesLol true
1 likeNegatory my friend, that kid actually joined up the madman.
2 likesI was thinking that very thing. Watching this guy and thinking this is the guy who would say in the bar "I was going to join but..."
1 likeWell, that kid is now a "SoundCloud(?)rapper"
2 likesbruuhhh 😹😹
1 likeUgh! What I would pay to hear his classmates talk about what he was like in school.
1 likejesus fucking christ i hate this comment but i love it at the same time
1 likeFun fact that kid actually did grow up to be a soldier in the army
1 likeYeah but that kid is grown up and actually joined the army lol
2 likesFun fact: the kid from that video actually did become an army ranger. Kinda happy ending for him
1 likeLies cuz he actually became a soldier lol
1 likeHe wasnt a future u.s. army soldier after all 😥
0 likesfunny that cause that kid actually went into the military.
1 like@Stephen Stalking also ik its been a year but what did he say?
0 likesthis that one rotc kid who thought they where the lieutenant of the high school
2 likesPut this comment in the vault
2 likesOmfg, yes! 😂
1 likeI'm pretty sure he's actually in the army now
1 likeLITERALLY 💀💀💀
1 like@Take a Byte out of Gaming it's “than“, not “then“ you dropout.
0 likesHa ha he. No, it's really not.
1 likeBut with the bad ending
0 likesSadly, it's the canon one
So basically he is threatening me with signing up with the military, going to Afghanistan, killing a couple of civilians, get PTSD, becoming homeless for being a "hero" of the states, and then what, in a drunken state of psykomode remember me in his childhood and kill me? Respect.
0 likesOmg omg omg omg omg omg.
1 likeWell the thing is he actually did become a U.S Army Soldier
1 like😂😂😂
0 likes@NagsterTheGangster no he didnt, hes a shitty sound cloud rapper now, look it up
1 like@Carmody Yo, I did, you're totally right, I got fuckin jebaited by the clickbait title and didn't actually watch the video to confirm the info. Took me all of 5 seconds after clicking that link to see verified footage of an actual interview with him and.... he most certainly is NOT in the army.... lmfaooo... I fuckin died laughing at how goddamn WRONG I was hahaha. Like I was the absolute farthest from correct I think I've ever been on a statement right there lmaoo. Like the total opposite of an army soldier.
0 likesThank you for setting me straight man, Im'a reply to my comment for the other people who upvoted it. Appreciate chu man.
Yo, downvote my shit here, cuz its totally 100% incorrect. He DID NOT join the army... It appears as if he may have had some kind of head injury sometime in his life, as will be apparent if you look up the actual interview.. XD lmao (jokes)
0 likes@Arc Warden Ok megaCRINGE man. PWND xD. Wait why aren't you laughing?
0 likesThis whole time I was looking for a handicapped space and realized this man got mad he got a BETTER SPOT than the handicapped spot
0 likesAnyone else notice how his arm goes from in pain to fine to in pain again lol.
2 likesThis p.o.s had no right taking that man's life.
3 likes"You know terminologies we don't" lol.
1 likePS: He was angry, thats why he shot him imo. His pride was injured when he got knocked on his ass while playing the vigilante.
Moral of the story, you don't shoot people, EVER. Especially if you're a father.
Replies (1)
Moral of the story dont assualt people who are not doing anything illegal
0 likesNot only did he shoot another man in the chest, he shot himself in the foot during that interview
2144 likesReplies (14)
Best comment
12 likesThis is very good
5 likes1 shot lol
0 likesI thought this dude got cleared and it caused an uproar? I haven’t finished video but I saw it on Active Self Protection awhile back
1 like@Hunter Flowerson No, he's definitely in jail: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Markeis_McGlockton#Trial,_conviction_and_aftermath
3 likesHyena
0 likesI swear
0 likesHaaaaa
1 like@Hunter Flowerson I thought the same thing, soon as I started watching this I almost turned it off cuz I was sooooo pisssssed when I heard he was all good cuz the “stand your ground” law so I didn’t even wanna watch this. But I double checked... and I guess eventually they did. Bastard got 20 years !!!!!!!!! I WAS AMAZED!!!!!!! What george Zimmerman did was 10x worse and he got no time, in the same state
2 likes@Laura Rowland don’t be an idiot. Zimmerman was getting his brains bashed against the concrete. Zimmerman killed his perpetrator in self defense, this guy shot his attacker after the perpetrator stopped the aggression.
1 like@Laura Rowland he didn’t chase he followed a suspicious thug, which is not against the law and he was attacked for it.
1 like@Map Led a suspicious thug? Oh I forgot it don’t matter how old a child is, if he’s black he’s a thug 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
4 likesNo that LITTLE BOY was being followed by a suspicious thug, after the 911 operators told him not too. He is no different than every karen we see on camera not minding his business.
Lmao man, the racism. A young boy buys some skittles and walks home, and now he’s a suspicious thug. Lmao okay buddy
@Map Led Zimmerman attacked a black child for buying skittles
3 likes@Map Led Do you acknowledge you’re racist?
0 likesI can appreciate self defense, but a good gun owner has a responsibility to everyone around them to make the right decision when exercising that defense. Gandalf sad it best. "True courage is not knowing when to take a life, but when to spare one."
0 likesJust wanna point out that the prosecutor’s explanation of beyond reasonable doubt doesn’t hold. Innocent until proven guilty. When you wake up and see the neighborhood soaked you immediately assume it rained whether you saw clouds, heard thunder, smelled rain, or none of those things. So what must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt is that the helicopter dumped water over the neighborhood.
0 likesThis guy is almost comically destroying his own defense with a stupid amount of confidence.
1564 likesReplies (7)
the defense himself was comically bad at his closing argument
33 likesHe definitely thought it would be a quick 5 minute explanation and he’d be on his way 😂
25 likesRacists are not known as the brightest
20 likes@Thunderstruck Not being racist doesn't mean to not see color or culture. That's also stupid. That guy is a racist though. Full on.
12 likesPlot twist: It was a negligent discharge, and he it too ashamed to admit it no matter what.
5 likesLmao fr
0 likesPart of this I'm sure had to do with the cordialness of the officers at first, which may have given him the idea that they were "on his side"... at least until he dug himself too deep with explanations.
0 likesThis is why you should avoid confrontation. Not because being confrontational is inherently wrong, but because there are way too many nut jobs out there who just want an excuse to kill someone.
5116 likesReplies (189)
"Would you be willing to spend the rest of your life in Prison, or Die?"
96 likesNo?
Then go on about your business.
Nah, none of that would’ve happened if the other guy didn’t push him for talking. He’s in the wrong first, then this guy is in the wrong. Obviously the shooter is more wrong but this wouldn’t have happened if the guy didn’t push
141 likes@Christian Deltoro Drejka was harassing the victems wife.
271 likesIf you walked into the parking lot, and some creep was badgering your Mother, Wife, or Daughter;
Would you be calculating and rational, or would you be furious?
@BlenderBanana I wouldn’t go up and push them I was just step in between and ask what’s happening while being assertive yet deescalating at the same time. Done it many times
179 likes@BlenderBanana they’re both acting out on immediate overreaction on a situation because of their beliefs of a threat on the other side. Get it?
48 likes@BlenderBanana I don’t think that guy would’ve pushed him if he had a gun himself. Who knows how he would’ve handled it differently
15 likes@Christian Deltoro That is your racism, turning an alarmed boyfriend into a "Thug".
98 likesYou need to be Better.
@Christian DeltoroCounterpoint: it also wouldn't have happened if the guy didn't start something with a gun and shoot at the unarmed guy as he was retreating.
95 likes@Christian Deltoro a push does not get you killed man, pulling the trigger does, big difference right there
72 likes@Alex bellamy you’re making your own argument lol
9 likes@BlenderBanana i would go ask them whats going on, but im white so its normal for us to talk before acting.
19 likes@Alpha Wolfgang Aaron Dean?
5 likesI don’t think Michael was a nut job. I just think he was mistaken about self defense laws and got it wrong. He thought it was justifiable when it wasn’t (there was no risk to life and it wasnt his last resort).
17 likesUnfortunately once he pulled that trigger there’s no going back.
@Not Me Not Me someone who thinks self defense allows you to shoot someone who is running away from you IS a nutcase imo 😒
66 likesOnly in the USA , avoiding the confrontation will not be a long term solution . Come here in Canada , we don't have these problem , and the main problem i see here is not humain poor judgement , but the easy possibility that anyone can carry a weapon . Take the weapon off the situation before hands , and we have no murder, and no case .
26 likesSince when is justified "confrontation" assaulting someone from behind? This story would be very different if the pushed guy had hit his head hard. Sure, he overreacted a LOT but you can't call the other guy innocent either, he also overreacted
29 likesThat's exactly why I let more people than I probably should act like a tough guy bc it's just not worth it. You never kno what can happen and I'm especially more logical since I have kids now. Especially this guy being in his 40s and starting drama like just go in the store and keep your comments to yourself man! He's carrying a gun and most people that carry a gun for "self defense" are either looking for trouble and just looking for any reason to shoot or in my honest opinion they are deathly afraid in general!
14 likes@BlenderBanana I'm not starting off with slamming the person to the ground as hard as I can.... This is the reaction if you came out of the store on he was actively beating the woman right there in front of you.
14 likesNot Me Not Me him thinking self defense allows you to shoot someone that’s backing away just cause he shoved him does make him a nut job lmao
9 likes@BlenderBanana He was using words. Stick and stones… it’s part of being a civil person. I wouldn’t aggressively assault someone for blabbing at someone I care about. And it doesn’t have to be a woman like you characterize.
13 likesHe was totally justified
3 likes@Rush Blyat Except he wasn't, because, ya know...he's now in jail for killing someone without justification.
30 likesAnd bully smaller ppl by knocking them to the floor for no reason.
5 likesdisagreed, both are in the wrong, the first guy went too far pushing the other guy, he was mad at the woman for illegally parking in a handicap spot which is understandable the first guy made it a confrontation by pushing the man but the second man is definitely also in the wrong for shooting him.
12 likes@Christian Deltoro As the DA said, he was justified in drawing his firearm but not in discharging it once he began backing up.
16 likes@KoKoNutt The guy was illegally parked himself & had previous incidents of pulling out his gun in road rage incidents. The guy was a psycho badgering a woman & child over a parking space that did not impact him.
21 likesWell someone yelling to my gf for over 5 minute is reason enought for a push..if hes too weak to be able to stand up and first reflex is to shot..then ye put that nutjob in jail for a while..he initiated the confrontation.
5 likes@Ben Coon yea, we know….. you arguing with yourself lol
1 like@BlenderBanana They do. So do Yellow, Brown, Red, Green and White. What is your point? Can you stop being racist?
9 likesor, you know, defend themselves
1 like@Andy Carver Was he "dedending himself" when he brandished a gun at another driver on a highway?
5 likes@Andy Carver Micheal Drejka had a history of drawing his weapon in frustration, in non-threatening situations;
16 likesthe relevant instance here is that he pulled a gun on a woman during a road-rage incident in which he was charged with brandishing.
That case was 3 years priors to the murder of Mkaries Mcglockton
Also something that anyone who carries concealed should know, to avoid confrontation whenever possible because it's a liability.
6 likes@Christian Deltoro He himself prompted the whole confrontation. Then shooting someone for pushing you over? Get real...
8 likesThis is why you shouldn't assault people* fixed it.
5 likes@Penguin of Death Nobody is defending the shooter, the point is that you don't just randomly assault people even if they are being annoying for the simple reason that they can be a maniac with a gun. If that guy didn't push him and simply got in his car and left, he'd be alive right now, but because he wanted to be a big alpha male beating up the guy bothering his girlfriend now he's dead, that's all.
15 likesExactly. Being in the right doesn't mean you're safe from harm from a psycho with a gun. Assume anyone in America is carrying.
3 likes@dhvyse he wasn't in the right, he parked in a handicap spot like a POS and then through someone on the ground for confronting him and his girlfriend about it.
4 likes@Christian Deltoro Right on , homey thought it was just going to be another 1 sided assault. Not today.
2 likes🤔👍🇬🇧
0 likes@Publius The Federalist and was given 20 years+ for killing someone in the wrong. Is that enough for you?
1 likeI don’t live in the states or anything, but I feel as if anyone were able to holster a weapon where ever, it makes peoples naturally aggressive. I don’t know, but I still don’t want to make excuses for this guy cause he looks like he just wanted trouble.
2 likesAll over a parking spot my first thought was excessive force.
5 likes@moneyball32 The guy who murdered the other guy simply spoke. don't pretend like thats on the same level as someone introducing violence by pushing someone. Thats just dumb.
6 likes@Christian Deltoro you really want Trump again I bet
2 likes@BlenderBanana I wouldn't knock them on their ass as my first action, no. People downplaying the stupidity of that are being dishonest. It's AS ridiculous to use that amount of force about a conversation AS it was for Drejka to shoot him after he was backing up. Both were extremely stupid levels of escalating force beyond what situation called for. Except the first one didn't kill anyone. There's a world where Drejka collapses and hits his head and dies if he's an older man and you shove him like that. Equally stupid actions. Just one had worse consequences AS it played out, that's all.
11 likesYou'd be surprised how much longer you live minding your own shit.
6 likes@Skelly Scary Why would you say that? I have not found a single clue towards any racist ideas in any of Christian Deltoro's comments. The only two people I've seen bring race up in this discussion are you and another person to blame Christian for racism.
5 likesHe's just saying that agressive overreaction is a bad thing, on both sides. Both guys overreacted, each time bringing the conflict to a worse level. Obviously the shooter is wrong for shooting this guy and it is very sad that had to happen. But not overreacting on either side could have prevented all this.
@BlenderBanana i would be rational.
3 likesyup!
0 likes@Christian Deltoro while there are definitely people that don't understand what they're talking about at all. Reacting to them by calling them the true racist social justice warrior children looking for the next enemy..does just as much harm, if not more, as the misunderstanding they originally had. It fuels that possible mentality of an enemy in every comment, and that hurts everyone involved. Things are changing very very quickly, compared to how stagnant things were for a long time. It makes sense there's confusion and anger, some of which might be directed at the wrong target. I appreciate your effort to have a rational conversation, but instead of trying to explain why they're wrong. Find a common ground you can agree on first. Like the planet burning more each day, or pollution killing our environments. We should ALL be on the same side there(yet some people are not). After you've realized you aren't that different, then bring up the uglier topics. Much less chance for aggression on both sides, who knows, you may learn something new about them and their life.
2 likesThaaat is sadly true
0 likes"This is why you should avoid confrontation."
6 likesNo, this is why you should have laws that stop the mentally unstable from owning guns, let alone carrying them around. And the main reason for this is to stop them from getting hot-headed and killing someone over a trivial f*cking incident in a car park.
Would Drejka have used a knife if he didn't have a gun? Maybe, but it's a lot less likely because using a knife, even against an unarmed person, requires that you get within striking distance so you might end up getting a beating instead. That's if Drejka even has the balls to fight at all, there's a reason he chose a gun over intelligent conversation.
And no, avoiding confrontation just means the bullies get whatever they want. The problem here is not that there was an conflict, the problem is that Drejka had a gun.
Like meeeee wooohoooo
0 likes@Christian Deltoro The victim shouldn't have shoved the shooter, no.... but its hardly justification for shooting him. Every bar fight, every street tussle, every sporting event where fans get a little too drunk and raucous would end in a fatal shooting if we all thought that.
7 likes@Guillaume Brouillard Fair idea, however when everyone else isn't playing by your rules and carries a gun?
2 likesThis only applies to countries where anyone can have a gun of course. Otherwise confrontation solved many conflicts in a peaceful way for me
2 likesWell confrontation is not inherently wrong but yea
1 like@Christian Deltoro Some people see racism in absolutely every situation. I see nothing about your comment that was racist.
3 likes@Christian Deltoro You're out of your mind.
3 likes@Christian Deltoro "The guy deserved to be shot, he pushed a guy down to the ground." you are saying.
6 likes@mark watts no reason??
1 likeOr maybe you just don’t go up to someone in that way, push them. I teach how to more appropriately confront and it can be done in much more beneficial ways.
2 likes@Koba no, and i don’t appreciate those words. I’m saying all could have been different in how they chose conflict. Of course he didn’t deserve to be shot.
2 likes@weavergrad It could be different with mechanisms that prevents actual nazis to become police officers.
2 likesPeople have gotten killed for being kind
1 likeThink so as well. Why push a man to the ground? I would never do that just because someone says something i dont like. He got punished for that pretty hard. Wayy too hard of course, by our law and standards. But in other countries or other times: being that aggressive and disrespectful often meant death.
2 likes@Christian Deltoro right ✅
1 like@alien so
1 like@alien so
1 likeOr you could vote for regulation that would prevent stuff like this... This usually never happens where I live because people cant just walk around with weapons just because they are Fing cowards and cant handle regular life and act like their little town is Mogadishu or something.
2 likes@BlenderBanana doesnt matter if theyre “harassing your wife” if they are standing at a distance and using words and you walk up and initiate violent force, you are the aggressor. Violent force can only justifiably be used to stop violence or the imminent threat of violence. You being furious at someone is not a justified reason to assault them.
6 likes@BlenderBanana why do you feel compelled to bring race into this conversation? No one said anything about race or anyone being a thug until you showed up.
5 likes@moneyball32 true that he didnt have to confront the woman about where she parked, but Michael didn’t initiate violence, but he certainly escalated it after the other man initially assaulted him.
2 likes@Alex bellamy shoving someone to the ground could be considered deadly force, people have been pushed or punched and hit their head on the concrete and died.
3 likes@Josh Bowen The person I was replying to called the Murdered man a "Thug", which in America has been a Racial-Designator since the 80's. See, "Trayvon Martin", or "Breonna Taylors Boyfriend for examples of the right villifying the victems by refering to them as such.
2 likesAs to the element of race, on the subject of Micheal Drejka (and his interraction during interregotation), pretending that it did not play a role in the decisions leading to this foolishness is either disengenuous or naieve.
@Josh Bowen It does not justify the actions of the dead man, but it is certainly relevant to the culpability of Micheal Drejka.
1 likeProvoking a fight, is not a shield from justice when the consequences of your behavior lead to tragedy.
@BlenderBanana i didnt see the thug comment maybe they deleted it, and what michael say that suggested that race was a factor? I must’ve missed that part.
2 likesNo. This is why you shouldn't put your hands on people. That guy assaulted him and got what was coming to him. He got assaulted right back for his trouble.
4 likes@Scott Aveles moral justification in your opinion but not legal justification
4 likesThis case is right on the borderline of legal justifiable homicide (the illegal side). Drejka was assaulted. Had Drejka a fallen and cracked his skull open and died, something not impossible with that hard of a push, MgGlockton would have been the one facing murder charges. Had the incident played out the same but Drejka not fired MgGlockton probably would be charged with assault. Personally if the attack was completely unprovoked I would feel Drejka is justified regardless of the law. However here he put himself in a situation that is going to escalate a good percentage of the time, and the coward is carrying a gun showing here he's ready to use it without hesitation. Do I think MgGlockton got what was coming to him? Yes that is my initial reaction to the assault. But you can't go instigating and shooting everyone violent bully you encounter.
2 likes@Josh Bowen No, they did not delete it. It is an inference from his description of the incident; in which he justifies Micheal Drejka's behavior as a rational response to "being attacked".
1 like@Dim Jong Un That's a sickly sanctimoniuos post you posted.
1 like@Michael McGee thanks. I call em like I see em. Are you one of his proud boy buds?
2 likesYeah this dude was looking for trouble and he felt an inflated sense of confidence because he legally cared a firearm. People really need to understand the carry laws and potential trouble they come with before taking that step
3 likes@Cory C This case is not close to legally justifiable homicide (I'm a lawyer, I would know). He shot him as he was walking away. He was in no danger. Shooting him while he was being rushed would be another story.
4 likes@BlenderBanana hey man welcome to America. Here it's actually perfectly legal to criticize someone for illegally parking in a handicapped spot, and in this country we've decided that people should be able to voice such an opinion without fear of being physically assaulted.
3 likes@Christian Deltoro
5 likesIf we're going to play the finger pointing game, he confronted a lone women over parking in a handicapped space in an empty parking, starting the conflict. Parking in that spot is inconsiderate and illegal, but it didn't personally effect him and certainly didn't warrant his reaction.
@Daniel Flanard if his mom that is handicapped was there, which she is frequently he says, then it would’ve affected him, so he’s trying to be considerate for others in the situation. What he did to start with was ok in everyone’s book. The other guy came in way aggressive and escalated shit. They could’ve gone about their ways if he hadn’t pushed like that. People are inconsiderate to everyone else. They shouldn’t have been parked there at the end of the day and thought they were entitled to it. So no, try again pal
4 likes@Christian Deltoro By that logic Drejka instigated the whole thing by approaching a young mother in her car who was not bothering anyone while armed with a gun.
8 likes@Christian Deltoro
6 likesSure, how about the several seconds in which he hesitated to pull the trigger after effectively making the threat dissolve. Brandishing a gun in a moment of panic is a justifiable escalation, and it works very well because most people don't want to die over a meaningless dispute, as displayed by the deceased. Since he didn't fire immediately, he had no reason to fire several seconds later once is was obvious that the attacker was backing off. There's also parking illegally to argue with someone about parking illegally, the length and nature of the altercation which ultimately didn't help anyone who would've needed the spot, and in conjunction with the second point, his calm composure during the interrogation. He lost his temper over the misuse of a parking space but was collected after killing someone. Have you really considered the kind of man you're defending?
@Daniel Flanard you’re arguing with yourself here bud, nobody disagreeing with you, in fact I’ve already stated all of this previously. You on the other hand are trying to deny what I’m saying is right and justify your own shit. Read before speaking because you talking to your self at this point.
3 likes@Christian Deltoro
5 likesYou have been dumping the blame on the victim since your first comment, so no, you haven't said the same things boyo; you won't condemn the shooters actions. Anyone who views a bruised ass and a bruised ego as grounds to take someone's life is a little nutty. They say my generation is the morally bankrupt one, good grief.
@Scott Aveles 😂😂 bet you can’t fight either
1 like@Daniel Flanard I really appreciate the thoughtfullness of your elaboration.
1 likeOr don't be a thug and park in handi-cap parking spot if your not handi-cap and don't push someone to ground or attack them for yelling at you for breaking law like wtf common sense. Thug got shot for it and died end of story stand your ground why he got sentenced for man slaughter is beyond me.
3 likes*Avoid confrontation in the USA
2 likes@Dorado De-Escalate. Re-Orient. Appeal to Consequences.
1 like@Brett K if you think a thug is someone that parks in a handy cap space……how do you even talk to girls 🤦🏾♂️
4 likesAlso…..he parked illegally as well…
3 likes@moneyball32 Building point: There wouldn't be a casualty if there were stricter gun laws
2 likes@Brett K he got sentenced for manslaughter because he was guilty of manslaughter. I don't think you understand stand your ground laws as well as you think you do.
4 likes@BlenderBanana He didn't know what was going on with the conversation. He ran up & escalated things by pushing this guy. He deserved something bad to happen but white dude with the gun overreached on what was allowed in this circumstance. For one thing, when you shove someone unexpectantly that hard onto the concrete, you can easily kill them if they hit their head. His butt should have been in jail but maybe not in the ground
5 likesWhat if the nut job is the one confronting? He's armed and he's standing just feet from your car.
1 likeThey're both unlikable character, though one more so than the other. Don't park in the handicap space without a sticker. Be more polite when talking to someone. Don't use violence to escalate things. Don't kill someone.
3 likes[insert comment about how removing the gun from the equation would have resulted in no loss of life, maybe even no initial confrontation]
3 likes@Alpha Wolfgang haha best comment so far. Lmao
0 likesIf Michael Drejka would not have a gun he will never start that confrontation
5 likes@Christian Deltoro Given the facts in this case, this was not a justification for self defense with deadly force. Yea he pushed him and when Mike drew his weapon the attacker backed up and disengaged. He is no longer the aggressor. It pays to know when and when not shoot.
4 likesA certain 17 year old did it best in Wisconsin, especially after fending off his 3rd and final attack, the others backed off and slowly backed away from him when he presented his weapon in their direction. Had he shot those people backing away from him, he would be in prison right now.
@jf 5-mars your country has a terrible judiciary system and an even worse PM
1 like@A.B I am, and I do. I'm the Miss Cleo of this thread, call me now.
0 likes@Row tell me what I said, repeat it back
0 likes@Christian Deltoro I agree with you. The guy was in the wrong for immideatly aussalting him but the shooter was also in the wrong for shooting him
2 likesjust move to europe lol
0 likes@BlenderBanana he could have died from being pushed over by hitting his head. no rational person would push like that, even if they were "talking" to your family
2 likes@riley bobbert But he did not.
3 likesInstead he murdered a man, after provoking a fight.
Which was after he brandished his gun at an unarmed woman, on a highway, during a road-ragd incident.
Which is why he was sentanced to twenty years in prison.
@BlenderBanana oh ok so no one said thug youre just inferring that
1 like@Josh Bowen American discussion one of euphamisms, especially on the topics of Racism.
1 like@BlenderBanana but your accusing them of racism and using a euphemism for “thug” simply because they said that he was not justified in assaulting the guy. Thats why i believe you are making it about race when no one else had made it about race before you entered the conversation.
1 like@Josh Bowen Christian Deltoro was making it about race by describing a Man Defending the dignity of his partner as "Violent", and "Brutish";
1 likeThe inferrence is very clear from the trajectory of his arguments and defense of Drejka behavior.
You are falling into the trap of many of America's moderate's where in you are ignoring the consequences of an implication, in favour of the pedant.
@BlenderBanana im not favoring the man who shot him at all. And you cannot legally defend someone’s dignity with the use of violent force. Theres nothing racial about it. If someone is threatening the dignity of your loved on you are not legally allowed to use violence to defend your loved ones dignity. If you say that its wrong to use violence against a bon violent person that doesn’t make you a racist. What youre trying to do is pull out the race card so that anything you say automatically becomes truth because if someone disagrees then they’re a
1 likeRacist.
@Josh Bowen I am saying Micheal Drejka was relying upon racism for the hope of being permitted to manufacture a murder,
2 likesAnd I am refrencing a pattern in Christians Delonto's accussation, that justifies Drejka's behavior by forcing the murdered man into an archetype as old as America's Caste System; that has been developed in such a way that calling the murdered man "a thug" is as unesscary, as calling him by the "traditional slur".
@Hayles lmao that was far from "slamming" him on the ground🤔🤔🤔.. That was a push, hard push but nonetheless a push.. nice try tho🤣
1 like@BlenderBanana thats your opinion. I dont see any evidence that race was a determining factor in any of this. The only evidence you have of racism being a factor is that the man is white.
1 like@Josh Bowen Do you consider the Presidency of Donald Trump to have been "racist" ?
1 like@BlenderBanana holy shit change the subject much? Lol. I know a red herring when i see one.
1 like@Strange Universe if that was your understanding from everything I said, then there’s no having a rational conversation with you because nowhere did I say that. Have a good day, stay ignorant
0 likes@BlenderBanana he was not touching her!!
0 likes@BlenderBanana he was not touching her. Keep hands off!
1 like@D K hell yeah murder is civil
0 likesSadly, many of those "nut jobs out there looking for an excuse to kill someone" also go by the description of "Cop"
1 like@BlenderBanana Sorry, but having a hot temper isn't a justification for assaulting somebody. You don't have a right to hurt ppl because they say mean things to you or a loved one lol. If you can't control your temper and approach things calmly and rationally, then you have a lot of growing up to do. A man with no self-control is no man at all. Neither of these men displayed such qualities, and now one is dead and one in prison. 99.9% of the time you reap what you sow. 99% of alllll the bad things that happen to you are things you've brought upon yourself in some way.
0 likesUh, how does a man avoid confrontation, involving a racist idiot harming your woman and kid?
0 likes@BlenderBanana he didnt provoke a fight. he was arguing verbally. then he was pushed hard, which could have killed him. people die from hitting their heads on the ground. you cant take earlier stuff into account or else they would talk about how saint geroge floyd was a career criminal
1 like@riley bobbert doesn’t justify taking his life
1 like@MastaKush427 unfortunately a lot of them do.
0 likes@saguirre760 So you’re saying that people in these neighborhoods are inherently violent? I mean those are your words not mine you’re saying it in the suburbs you can talk to someone like an adult but in “these neighborhoods” that shit won’t fly so you’re telling me that they are inherently violent people huh
1 like@BlenderBanana probably not assault the guy if they weren't in physical danger
0 likes@Kenny Phelps I had to reread my post as I forgot the context of what your post was. People in neighborhoods are aggressive. Same can be said of certain people in suburbs who take out their guns when a mouse farts. In most rough neighborhoods if you’re disrespecting someone’s wife don’t be surprised if you get a two piece to the face. It would be well deserved. By this opinion/post of yours it sounds like you think it was ok for the murderer to shoot the victim. I was on the fence with this case but JCS clearly explains the reasons why he was arrested, charged, and convicted. If the shooter would have minded his own business, the victim would be alive, the victim’s child would have a father, and the murderer would be out free.
1 like@One Above All Micheal Drejka was carrying a gun, and had previously brandished it at a woman during a road-rage incident.
0 likes@BlenderBanana don't push people and that should increase your life expectancy
1 likeYou forgot to add "in USA".
0 likesCoz the rest of the world is different
Some people should not take their gun out of the house.
1 like@Christian Deltoro he was talking though. He was yelling at a lady in the car with her young children. The ppl inside even heard the commotion.
1 like@BlenderBanana lol why do you keep deleting your comments? How is he racist saying they’re both in the wrong. Obviously the shooter went way over the line.
0 likes@Dave I am not deleting my comments.
0 likes@BlenderBanana The laziest response I have ever seen lol. "YOure RACist!"
0 likesI would have walked up and probably yelled at drejka, not pushed.
The guy shouldn't have been violent from the start of the confrontation, but the other guys shouldn't have harassed the mom in the car, and should have never pulled the gun. getting pushed =/= shooting. period. but to say they couldn't handle this differently, or that they both went to an aggressive option is simply not looking at the facts. drejka was obviously a monster that killed someone though.
@BlenderBanana you should calmly step in and ask if everything is okay and what's going on. Wouldn't it be best to remain calm and slowly try and edge towards the store or where people that are able to help can help. Its tricky, there no way to safely go about this. I would just avoid confrontation at all costs because mfs will be carrying and find any reason to cry about self defense
0 likes@BlenderBanana you should calmly step in and ask if everything is okay and what's going on. Wouldn't it be best to remain calm and slowly try and edge towards the store or where people that are able to help can help. Its tricky, there no way to safely go about this. I would just avoid confrontation at all costs because mfs will be carrying and find any reason to cry about self defense
0 likes@Christian Deltoro would you do the same if you got pushed like that? Would you taught your kid to do the same if you got pushed like that?
1 like@Christian Deltoro nah, none of this would've happend if the US were a normal country with normal guns laws, not a crazy place full of toddlers that can buy guns at walmart.
0 likes@Christian Deltoro this guy has a history of pulling his gun, he probably would have pulled it even if the guy didn't push him, also avoiding confrontation would be not pushing the guy because he clearly likes pulling out his gun on people which is what the original comment was saying
2 likesComments are stupid, yea he “shouldnt have” pushed Drejka , but drejka shouldnt have pulled up, parked and started harassing his wife for no reason, like the whole thing couldve been avoided completely due to drejka which is why people are more critical of him (+ the fact that he killed the dude for no reason. Someone pushes you push back lol guns make weak people feel strong )
2 likes@private static void you’re arguing with yourself……
0 likesChristian Deltoro You apparently didn’t see the video of the murder 🤦♂️
0 likesTheChocolateKiwii 💯💯
0 likesmoneyball32 Absolute FACTS!!!
0 likesAlpha Wolfgang It’s normal to verbally assault a woman over a parking spot that has nothing to do with you? Real rational “white guy” 🤦♂️
0 likesNot Me Not Me You literally just described a nut case..just saying 😂
0 likesKantanen Akseli He would have seen it coming if he would have been aware of his surroundings or better yet not actively verbally assaulting the guys girlfriend 🤦♂️
0 likesRush Blyat Except for the obvious fact that he was NOT “justified” at all 🤦♂️
0 likesmark watts So Bullying a woman over a parking spot that has absolutely nothing to do with you is ok? You have some twisted morals there kiddo 🤦♂️
0 likesKoKoNutt Only one of them was truly wrong and the complete cause of all of this and it absolutely was not the victim bud
1 likeCF At least someone here knows the facts of this case
0 likesStuart Gray 🤦♂️
0 likesAndy Carver 🤦♂️
0 likesBeardedcap 💯
0 likesPenguin of Death 💯💯
0 likesPublius The Federalist 🤦♂️
0 likesSaltan Of Swing What an idiotic statement 🤦♂️
0 likesDornpunzel 🤦♂️
0 likesLareese Blaque WRONG
0 likesScott Aveles Well the law doesn’t agree with you 🤦♂️
0 likesCory C Dreijka was pushed BIG DEAL 🤦♂️
0 likesB B 🤦♂️
0 likesDaniel Flanard 💯
0 likesBrett K 🤦♂️
0 likesriley bobbert He got pushed 🤦♂️
0 likesOne Above All 🤦♂️
0 likesTyler Jackson Context bud, context 🤦♂️
0 likesmmors 💯
0 likesThe victim was protecting his woman.
0 likes@BlenderBanana agreed
1 like@Kantanen Akseli watch the footage again.. Drekja has his arm raised in a threatening position as he is talking (probably yelling) to the woman.
0 likes@Josh Bowen "All I saw was that he was a black guy."
0 likesBut I also would've not been out bitching at people over a handicap sign in the first place ..
0 likes@Kenny Phelps Yes
0 likes@Alyx Coe protecting his woman from what ? Getting her feelings hurt slightly ? Over a guy asking about a parking space ???? HOW SENSITIVE CAN YOU GUYS BE 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1 like@E Riv well said kiddo 👏
0 likesThe most terrifying thing is that it took 19 minutes for paramedics to get to a gunshot victim
3545 likesReplies (79)
19 minutes isn’t too bad. I live in a rural area and the ranch I work at had an emergency once that took an hour and a half for any first responders to show up. We got lucky and the guy recovered fully in a few months
250 likes@Cody Ginther a gas station is gonna be located in town though, it's not exactly like they're out by the farms. I think a country as wealthy as America has a moral obligation to better subsidize adequate emergency services in rural and low income areas -- it's not fair people die because they lived in the wrong zip code. Obviously in rural areas, you're gonna have to leave the area for specialized/intensive care, but it's not like people in rural areas don't get shot or don't get mangled in equipment. To not even be able to get basic emergency response to a gas station within 20 minutes? It's embarrassing to be American at this point with how bad of a job we're doing. I mean, what if there'd been a fire??
223 likes@mmmk america is super spread out, idk where your from but i think it’s easy to underestimate that, there’s gas stations out in the middle of nowhere here
125 likes@mmmk Probably the terrible road design and spread-out-ness of america
55 likessucks living in the boonies doesnt it. here in CT might be quicker if 95 isnt in a stand still
10 likes@mmmk lmaooo I stop at a gas station that is like 45 minutes away from any emergency services all the time.
22 likes@mmmk wealth has nothing to do with ambulance times. Do you not understand the size of that country? every single town is different in that country, some ambulances will arrive quickly, others will be delayed. What is your comment?
33 likesI thought that was crazy too.
8 likes@Cody Ginther That store isn't that isolated.
11 likes@Cody Ginther Clearwater isn't rural.😂😂😂
19 likes@Derrick Oneal This happened in Clearwater. It's not rural, and it's not spread out. There are parts of Pinellas County that are both, but not Clearwater. It's a tech, tourism and Scientology town. They also host MLB spring training. There's no excuse for that response time. There are level 1 trauma centers in the same county. They could have sent a helicopter FFS. GSW to the chest is level 1.
35 likes@Patrick O'Neill Clearwater isn't the boonies.
7 likes@mmmk I agree with you on that one. Change needs to be made
2 likesno one drove him to the hospital??? especially the dude who shot him or the girl in the car
2 likesI see that somebody has commented that it's still ridiculous that it took 20 mins because it's not that type of area.. but I live in a small town. It's 35 mins away from any hospitals/medical care of any type but we still have a couple gas stations.
0 likes@quicksilver b did this occur in a small town area away from hospitals? NO Stop making that comparison. Did you even watch the video. It clearly says where the incident took place
8 likes@Cody Ginther This wasnt a rural area....
9 likes@Lebaron Jim I literally said that in my comment that somebody else already commented saying that wasn't the case in this specific situation. I merely said it is possible because another commenter said it wasn't. But it is if you live in that type of area. If you actually read you would know that, it's already been acknowledged. So thanks for your pointless comment.
0 likes@quicksilver b They werent in an unpopulated area. I wouldnt have made the comment i did if they were. The end. You act like its some revelation that if people live out in the sticks medical services will take longer. No shit Sherlock
5 likesI was thinking this too but remembered that police usually are required to be sure there is no longer a threat before paramedics can arrive. So I’m sure some of that time is the police clearing the scene
0 likes@Redd Bendd I wouldn't have moved him if I was his partner. Probably not the right thing to do, but 🤷
0 likesEven 5 mins wouldn't have saved him with the equipment they have, as he got shot in the lung and heart and as the prosecutor said "Perfect (kill) shot" I dont think anything could have saved him, sadly.
3 likeswelcome to clearwater lollll
2 likes@Wuntler tumbo I dont speak jogger. Can you translate to English please.
4 likesMaybe the medic that was stationed in the area was on another call and another station obviously farther away was sent.
0 likesIt's not ideal, I waited an hour on the phone while I was in anaphalaxis once when I lived ten minutes drive away from a hospital. Resources are horribly stretched
0 likesYou know how incredibly fast that is?
0 likes@mmmk The video also said that it happened at 3:30 PM and doing a quick Google search, 11 minutes is the best right now. There's also the fact that paramedics can't just teleport to their ambulance meaning they wouldn't start moving right away. Another factor is that it takes time for a 911 call to be made and an ambulance to be dispatched. Okay now imagine all of these things and it's the afternoon and there is tons of traffic, it makes perfect sense why it'd be 19 minutes but you don't seem to care about the reality of the situation, you just wanted to use this perceived wrongdoing (which it isn't) to complain.
5 likes@KingRezz Don't believe everything you read online
0 likes@mmmk Maybe you feel embarrassed all the time for reasons other than America.
0 likes@Cody Ginther
2 likesGiving an anecdote about a worst scenario doesn't make the lesser one better 😂 ya'll gotta stop thinking in rank order.
They might have been volunteers which would've added significant response time.
0 likes@Dan Nah. The standard for response times is that 90% of ambulance response times should be under 13 minutes, and for fire departments (which almost always respond to medical calls as well) under 6 minutes. It's absurd to think 20 minutes is fine.
2 likes@literal antifa terrorist "standard response time" doesn't mean much when, as stated by an above commenter, the physical distance between the nearest hospital and the gas station takes 11 minutes to travel with idea traffic. Plus dispatch and preparation time. 19 minutes is reasonable
0 likes@easypistachios I'm aware, I was responding to the commenter who said a 19 minute response time was the norm overall.
1 likeLmao that does sound like a lot to me In NYC. They’ll be anywhere in like 3-4 mins lol
1 likeplease , that's lightning fast
0 likesIts worth noting that Paramedics wont arrive to the scene until Police have cleared the area from any potential danger. This makes sense, considering there have been cases as recently as earlier this year when Paramedics have been attacked and even killed by their patients or by unrelated bystanders.
2 likesMy wife grew up on the Navajo Nation. The Indian Health Services ambulance is notorious for taking forever to respond due to lack of staffing and the remote nature of the reservation. Her grandma fell out at her ranch a few years back, i called the dispatch and they told me it would be 45 minutes to an hour. We had to meet them half way with my father in laws truck, flagged then down as they approached and they took her to the closest IHS hospital in Tuba City.
0 likes(Depending on the part of town) it's not. When I was younger and still with my ex husband I used to live in the worst part of town in my area and the cops barely even go near it because it's so fucked up. So when someone is being hurt or robbed IF the cops show up it will be quite a while before they get there. It's fucked up but true. In a way I get it but at the same time it's like... Your cops. You're supposed to put your life on the line for others. That's the whole purpose of them so... Do your fuckin job, y'know?
1 likeThey have other things to do. Caught in traffic? Blocked traffic? In the city he was lucky it was 19 minutes
1 like@Derrick Oneal Russia is spread out, half the population, more than double the area. The reason as to why it takes emergency services so much time to reach a shot person in USA is because that shot person is not the only one.
0 likesThat's why you call from the pay phone and say "officer down need immediate help by police and medical emergency services!" and hang up.
0 likes@Derrick Oneal If you want to know what the words "spread out" mean, come to Australia.
1 likeambulances have to get clearance from law enforcement before they are allowed to enter the scene and help the victim!!! only fireman and police are allowed on the scene for like the first 30 minutes atleast
1 likeA .45 response time is less then a second
0 likes@mmmk I don't think it's a funding issue, it's a logistics issue. We don't know the circumstances that caused the ambulance to take that long, but I don't think throwing more money at it would fix anything unless there was a shortage of medical personnel/vehicles/locations. But adding more ambulances to a crowded city doesn't make them get to their destinations any faster.
0 likes@Cody Ginther 19 minutes is very bad. Especially for a GSW.
0 likesAmerica is pretty spread out yes, at the same time we do have places that highly condensed. That means traffic, foot, bicycle and car. Like i remember that just in the early 2000s emergency services put out that they would follow speed limits and basically safely drive slightly faster than you. That's because we ended up getting more traffic and sometimes chases, rescue and fire emergency and other wrecks happen because of it.
0 likes@Keep crying fam for real
0 likes@Memecream You're right, but 19 minutes is inexcusable. We don't know the circumstances, maybe something happened that caused it to take that long but even with condensed traffic they control it.
1 like@Visassess for real, are none of y'all accounting for real life traffic
0 likes@Memecream Exactly, people assume ambulances or the cops start moving right away and drive straight to the scene at 80 mph
0 likes@mmmk I live near this area and the nearest hospital from this place is about 10-15 minutes away.. regardless though it shouldn't have taken that long
1 likeThat's the first thing that stood out to me as well
0 likes@Memecream false, EMS/Fire is allowed to exceed speed limits when responding to emergency calls. We still have to proceed with caution and we are not allowed to fly through red lights and stop signs. There is a law called Due Regard that basically states that a driver of a rescue truck or fire apparatus can be held liable if he or she drives like an asshole and gets in an accident.
0 likes@Dan You spelled "white neighborhoods" wrong
0 likesThat's Florida for ya
0 likesHere in the Netherlands there is a rule that an ambulance should be present at the scene within 6 minutes. Any place, any time of day. No matter how rural
1 likeamerican health system
0 likesThe UK had free universal healthcare and the best response times until the U.S. private healthcare invaded.
0 likes#SaveOurNHS
#EndYankeeOccupationOfBritain
@mmmk bruh your take is terrible
0 likesfor a shooting ems cant go on scene until it’s verified to be safe. this can take longer than people think, especially for a shooting.
0 likes@Jappie That's because the Netherlands is a better country than America, in pretty much every conceivable way. But Americans will ignore this fact and continue to declare that they have "the best response time in the world" lmao
1 likeThat's 'THE MOST TERRIFYING THING' are you serious...
0 likes19 is damn good depending where you live
0 likesThat's Pinellas County, FL for ya 🤷♂️
0 likesWelcome to the hood bud
0 likesIn my country's capital it sometimes takes more than 12 hours for an ambulance to respond to an emergency, regardless of the time of day.
0 likes@Derrick Oneal clearwater is a big city I live there
1 likeand this was in clearwater which isnt a bad bad place
1 like19 minutes?! That’s all?!
0 likesyou've never been to russia then :))
0 likesYea try not to get shot in a bad neighborhood, it’s a death sentence.
0 likes@Keep crying There’s a difference between calling an ambulance and calling in a chopper to be airlifted out. In rural towns airlifting patients is a very common thing especially how far away the hospital is and the severity of the emergency.
0 likes@mmmk you know, there is no illimited supply of ambulance, and person to drive the so called ambulance. Also trafic can be a bitch. Also sometimes what take the longer time, is just to take the phone call that lead to the ambulance rushing at the place of the tragedy. People often are to panic to answer the question correctly. Sometimes they don't listen the question you have to ask them, or they can even protest and waste some time before actually answering. When a bullet is fire at someone, there is no automatic bat signal that appears in the air. Most of the time the blame for late emergecy team arrival, is to blame on multiple factor. 19 minutes really is a great timer. Also, did you actually knew that most of emergency services, are most of the time, greet with some random dude, telling them they are to late and yelling at them. We are trying our fucking best. And we are sorry for the time we are to late, if we had to choose, don't have to think about it twice, we would save everyone. But it's not a matter of choice you see? And most of us handle very badly when people come to die because we wasn't able to save them. It's easy to blame us, because we are the person that should have save your relative.
0 likes@Visassess helicopters aren't available?
0 likes@Corky They aren't going to send out a helicopter for a location less than 20 minutes away in a crowded city.
0 likesI'm sure it was in a shit neighborhood where they don't put taxes towards things like that. Those people don't live in the best places ya know
0 likesI will never forget my stepdad pulling his gun in a confrontation. I was 12. I remember watching my stepdad get punched very hard in the face. He never fired a shot. He was barely standing up and was obviously stunned yet he had the awareness to recognize that the situation instantly de-escalated the moment he drew his weapon, exactly like what happened in this video. My stepdad would have said as soon as the dude started to step away, pulling the trigger would be murder and not self defense.
1512 likesReplies (37)
Your stepdad is a reasonable and level headed man, something rarely seen these days.
161 likesYet, if the other guy had a gun one of them would likely be dead.
35 likes@Magnus Carlsson Nope, I dont have a gun. My point is that people get shot because people get upset in the moment and just shoot. The idea that everyone has guns to protect themselves doesn't really work.
35 likes@Faktor114 I got you.
7 likesMy point was that your example was no good.
Also...next time I refer to "you", don't take it personally
@Magnus Carlsson Its difficult because there are people who think everyone having guns is a good thing...I forget that sometimes.
25 likes@Kyle Castloo bank robbers are the least likely to hurt you intentionally that makes literally no sense plus why shoot someone who’s robbing a business of a product already %100 insured
4 likes@Faktor114 "Yet, if the other guy had a gun one (1) if them would likely be dead"
5 likes...didn't you notice that one of them died anyway... without having a gun?
@Magnus Carlsson The comments are referring to the post about the stepdad pulling out a gun.
2 likes@Mark 1 Mod 0 Facts!! I wasn’t really into guns until I married my wife who comes from a family where she grew up shooting and learning how to properly use firearms.. Her father always told me no matter what, you never pull your firearm unless you are intending to kill.. And that should only be the case if you feel if your life, your families life, or an innocent persons life is in danger..
4 likesIt all depends on the situation which sucks the person assaulting you deserves what they get in my opinion which is why it's called assault the moment someone lays hands on you
0 likes@Faktor114 There's no differences between that story and the one on the video. Just another outcome.
0 likesThere's (must be) a reason why ppl doesn't shoot each over when in a standoff in the movies (which I don't understand)
@Faktor114 Yes because the cities with strict gun laws have such low gun crime! What a joke 😂 do a little research.
5 likes@Tommy Mc outside the US they do.
3 likesGuns are bad mmkay
0 likesAlways wait till the other guy kills you, then shoot, as to erase any doubt.
1 likeIf someone confronts me, you better believe I am gonna have my space or else, if my space gets invaded, they’re going 6 feet under. Let you taxpayers pay for my free food, housing, and medical care. 😂
0 likesExactly brotha God bless your stepdad
0 likes@Faktor114 nope it doesn't, look at all us guys ib UK.. we all get by with no guns, i rest my case...
0 likes@Noonyk2 Thats my point
0 likes@Faktor114 No probs
0 likes@Tommy Mc Yes, because knifves are much more deadly than guns. Therefore, everyone should have guns so that they don't use the more lethal weapon!
1 like@Tyrawr 😂🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
0 likes@Cole Games , using your analogy of a Herpetologist (A trained veterinarian who specializes in reptiles) being one of the few qualified individuals to own a python, at what point do we draw the line in training and experience being nessasary in owning a firearm? While I agree, prior to purchasing a firearm one should have basic training and familiarization with the weapon platform one seeks to acquire, yet how much training is needed?
1 likeAdditionally, criminals do not care about firearms legislation. If they want one, they will find one, and not submit to a 10 day waiting period. These days, 3D printers are getting good at making ghost guns as well. Then there are the other ghost guns, metal fully functioning 1911, Glock and Smith & Wesson replicas, chambered in. 40 Cal S&W and 45 ACP, made in the Philippines without Manufacturer / ATF&E Serial Numbers. Training, background checks and waiting periods only seek to hinder the responsible firearms owner, it is not a crime preventative, in my opinion.
Love how americans are convincing themselves that weapons are not the problem, only the human using it.... Lol go on with ur desillusions !
3 likes@John Smith have you ever seen someone using a gun that does not exist ?
2 likes@INEEDMONEY yeah legend has it they’re called ghost guns
1 likeWas he sucker punched like the guy in the video though? I've been sucker punch in the past and the surprise has a huge effect on how you perceive a situation. It goes from 0 to 9000 in a fraction of second and you don't understand what happened to you, every movement that happens afterward can be seen as an act of aggression. If I had been in this guy shoes I might have shot the dude as well. He was on the ground, shocked and hurt.
0 likesSmart man
0 likes@Chris Fernandez He said "that's why you shoot bank robbers. Texas style." Maybe you dont know a lot about legalities, but in texas you can shoot to kill someone that is actively stealing your property.
0 likesI’m glad he had restraint and was able to control himself.
0 likesYour stepdad shouldn't have been carrying a gun I the first place
0 likesYour step-dad knows how to handle a weapon. I'm sorry you had to go through that.
0 likesYou're right though, because I was initially thinking about it, and the guy fires one shot after he's already been attacked you know, so I was kind of mulling it over there... Clearly the guy is a pos just for doing this to a woman with three kids in the car, that parts are given but the rest... You're absolutely right.
0 likes@Faktor114 wrong. Ever heard of mexico
0 likes@Faktor114 i implore you to do some digging about countries outside of america. even if guns aren't available, people will still use what they can to carry out violence. humans by nature are flawed, and that's usually okay and fixable (based on the fact that we are humans and thus are usually able to ignore animalistic instincts or at least know what the consequences of their actions are), but an unfortunate amount of us slip between the cracks. for example, the UK has a huge problem with how they treat their jewish and romani citizens, as well as their migrant workers from eastern europe. in france, an elderly woman was defenestrated by an intruder who got triggered by her jewishness. despite making it glaringly obvious that he was proud to have killed a jew, he he was deemed unfit for trial because he was too high on weed. weed. it took forever for france to openly admit that it was a hate crime. he acted the same way nikolas cruz did - saying he was possessed by a demon - and actually got away with it. in contrast, nikolas cruz is under trial. the investigators knew he was trying to worm his way into making people believe he was insane.
0 likeswhat i'm trying to get at is that yes, america has a gun problem. but i'm tired of europe not being held accountable for their intense rise in anti-jewish hate crimes. even macron was heavily criticized for saying that her killer needs to stand trial.
you don't need a gun to kill.
@Faktor114 Also sweden has a low crime rate
0 likes@Rhys Cater dude dont be racist
0 likesHe violated everything that you learn in getting a CC license... especially the first rule, don't go looking for trouble. He was sentenced to 20 years BTW.
1686 likesReplies (62)
" He was sentenced to 20 years BTW. " AND someone kicked his as in prison! :)
180 likes@Mike Tayon really??? That's wonderful to hear hahaha
72 likes20 years of free food, housing, and medical care thanks to the American Taxpayer. Gotta love America. 😂
48 likesJust don't let him have a gun ever again when he gets out.
19 likesis there any way to find him and send him mail? id love to send him a couple words ya know? nothing bulgur of course i mean he is already being punished but idk maybe a friendly reminder that now there's children out there with no father who probably think about seeing their dad fall over in front of them.
38 likes20 years for leaving a family broken forever, hopefully one of those kids or a family friend goes for a little vigilante justice.
24 likes@Poker Joker lol funny, if it’s so great why not get yourself in there bud?…yeah didn’t think so
16 likes@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 Look at you. Reevaluate your life bud. Some risks are meant to be taken.
4 likes@Jax Anon I don't think you understand how long 20 years is, go ahead and reply to this comment in 20 years okay then we'll talk about it some more in 20 years.
25 likes@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 I don’t think you understand how important a human life is. 20 years is much shorter than eternity.
7 likes@Jax Anon I get the equibility of it, but it doesn't concern me. Everyone is born into their own shoes the way I see it, so I don't look down on anybody. I care more about what's practical. It's to contain a threat and provide a deterrent. That's the function of the penal system. Like I said before the guy is not even a threat without a gun. He was attacked first and that is not nothing, even though the vast majority of the blame is clearly overwhelmingly on him.
8 likesIs pointing out you're illegally parked on a disabled spot "looking for trouble"?
7 likes@Pietje Puk Yes.
12 likes@Jax Anon And parking illegally on a disabled spot is not?
8 likes@Pietje Puk No. Parking in a disabled spot is not “looking for trouble”
16 likesYep rule #1
1 likeThanks for update about the sentence
2 likes@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 20 years of imprisonment are not even close to 20 years of ordinary, free life. You feel like every day takes forever. Hour is like day, day is like a week, week is like a month and month is like a year but the single year is like eternity.
2 likes@js you're preaching to the quire. Is that at me?
0 likes@Poker Joker yeah don't try and act like prison is a walk in the park. I assure you it's not fun.
6 likes@Jax Anon
1 likeYes, it's more like causing trouble.
Concealed coward license
7 likesThe guy was attacked and he defended himself. He should not have killed him or shot his gun.. but thats what a weapon is for and that’s why people carry them around .. the guy attacked him first also.. I’m not saying he’s in the right , but I mean it’s one of those things were as sad as it is the guy was defending himself from 2 people one who had just assaulted him.. it’s either he sit there and not do anything or the latter
7 likesNot long enough.
0 likes@Bobby Dee and that would make carrying a gun without a license a coward.
0 likes@cam f the licence is irrelevant
0 likesWho killed intentioaly should be killed 20 year not justice
0 likesStand your ground law means you can fight with the same force as your attacker. He obviously gave him time to get up and fight but Drewhatever was too scared and used excessive force that was unnecessary. And who goes around looking for handicap stickers. I'm from the same neighborhood and heard the shots.
3 likesDeath sentence costs the taxpayer more than a lifetime in jail. Plus they have to suffer for years before they die
0 likesHe is only doing 10yrs...2 for 1 with good behavior
0 likes@Jax Anon Seriously? You want a kid to grow wanting revenge and then go to jail themselves? I hope you're not raising any kids of your own..
2 likesHe wasn’t looking for trouble though. He was being a good citizen, since the person was illegally parked. Then he gets assaulted by the deceased. Definitely not the instigator
2 likes@Poker Joker faaaaaaaaacts. But hopefully he meets some friendly bloods in prison :D
0 likes@Josh Ström probably not all of them, or even a large percentage of them you know, but possibly could stop a school shooting or two, maybe, if you think that's something worth doing?
0 likes@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 didn't say that no shit there isn't perfect solutions but wouldn't it be logical for law abiding citizens to have legally obtained guns to protect against those who have illegally obtained guns just seems like the best reality possible on the topic of guns and gun control
0 likes@Josh Ström is that the answer? You see because when you create a situation where everyone has a firearm that's a dangerous situation. You see I know that because I was in the military and I was in situations where every single person had a firearm and there were safety protocols and things that we did to avoid accidents that don't happen in civilian life so I want to know why you think that is a good idea without having something like that in place, or I want you to explain to me why the military didn't need to have those protocols in place.
0 likes@Josh Ström see I like guns. Guns are fun. Guns are badass. Guns are nice to have around and I wish we could live in a world where we could have guns around. But at the end of the day, what you have there is a tool that serves a purpose, and is also just a fun little thing to play with, you know, like anything else. Like say a Dremel tool for example. But let's say dremel tools were killing you know, however many people a year, and at some point the people around you decide that the benefit of you having a fun little toy to play with isn't worth the cost of that many human lives. Then in my book either you let that one go, or you decide blow them all off and live your life as a complete asshole. I guess do whatever you're comfortable with of the two.
0 likes@Poker Joker bro got his ass beat too but i bet he’s in special living now
0 likesSelf defense
1 likeThanks for the info
0 likesDamn, I just got to the part when he got let out after the interview, that’s good to hear
0 likesAnd he will never be able to own a gun again.
0 likes@Jax Anon and then Drejka can kill someone justifiably lol
0 likesGood :)
0 likes@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 Nobody needs to have a gub
0 likesi dont think he went looking for trouble, he told the woman off for parking in a disabled space the man made it trouble by pushing him
0 likesHe merely asked her not to park in a bay for disabled ppl...the big guy that knocked him to the floor had no need to get involved and be violent.
0 likesThank you so very much! I wanted to finish reading the comments before I started another JCS case and Googled the verdict 😁
0 likesTake care everyone, *please*! ❤
@Circassian Assasin well that was my measured position on gub control. I guess it's true what they say, you can't please all the people all the time, especially on the topic of gub control.
0 likesAre you people serious!? Listen, I am liberal for the most part. I do think everyone has the right to own a gun tho. But wrong is wrong.
0 likesThe black guy assaulted the guy first! The white guy was just talking and didn't do anything illegal.
You can say he was annoying or whatever but he didn't assault anyone. It's a free country. First ammendment. Say what you want but when you put your hands on someone and push them that hard to the ground, I no longer view you as the victim but the aggressor.
The black guy only retreated after he saw the gun pointed at him. It didn't matter if he was walking back at that point. The crime of assault was already committed. I am tired of my fellow liberals defending the suspects and victims of police violence no matter what they do. Resisting arrest, punching and cop, driving away, etc.
No one deserves to die for it but obey the law! Don't assault someone. Period. I dont feel bad for the guy who got killed in this situation at all. His girlfriend said, do I need to go get my man. They were the aggressors. The white guy was just annoying and nosy. But they were parked in the handicap parking spot which is also ILLEGAL!!!
@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 Om. You said you can only use force equal to the force being used against you.
0 likesThat goes both ways. The white was just using his words at first. Then the black guy escalated it by using physical violence.
So the black guy is wrong on every level here plus they parked in a handicap spot. Not good people. She probably got a settlement by suing someone too. I don't feel bad for them. They should have known a lot better.
@Milky Way okay you can't charge the black guy with assault because he is dead. Do you need me to explain anything else to you or are you done?
0 likes@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 Yes he is dead bc he broke the law and assaulted another man that was just using his WORDS. THATS ALL. You still don't seem to understand why assaulting someone is wrong.
0 likes@Milky Way so you're saying if someone doesn't agree with you that it's ok to murder someone on the spot for assaulting you, then you're saying that they "don't believe assault is wrong". That's pretty interesting. Do you find a lot of people agree with you about this?
0 likes@Trevor Lahey I'll back you up on that. Put my signature down for me.
0 likes@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 Smh. You are not making any sense. Assaulting someone is not "disagreeing". It is a crime that warrants self defense by any means necessary.
0 likesThe black guy was younger, bigger, stronger and clearly violent. He pushed him hard and then walked over him waiting for him to get up. He deserved it.
@Milky Way what if that was your kid and he got in a disagreement with someone and your kid through the first punch because the other kid was talking back to him any other kid was smaller and he took out a gun and shot him. How does that scenario play out now?
0 likes@Chad 1337P-De$tr0yer69 I am neither white or black. There are other races that live in this country that are not white or black. Or even Hispanic for that matter.
0 likesI am a dark skinned man from Southeast Asia. I have only voted for liberals all my life. But I call a spade a spade on both sides.
Most people are just like you, very partisan not just politically but culturally, religiously, even with your sports affiliations. Everyone is a fanboy of someone that they defend no matter what they say and do whether it be a musical artist, athlete, politician, cops, celebrity, etc.
I am not like that. I call a spade a spade. Chauvin deserved to go to prison.
Good
0 likes@Jax Anon Ah yes, the circle of death. At some point someone has to step up and be the bigger person
0 likes@Poker Joker sounds great on paper when u put it that way. But if you ain’t s tough guy (which he isn’t ) jail will be a fucking nightmare
0 likes@Jax Anon if you think not wanting to throw away your whole life because of a stupid ego is spineless, you're delusional
0 likesThis was the first video of yours that made me cry. A pointless loss of life because of some idiot. This poor poor family
2 likesReplies (3)
Way to defend a thug.. how would you like getting assaulted by one?
1 like@dabomboo7o I wouldn't have done anything to provoke an attack in the first place lol sure it sucks for people to park in a handicapped spot when they don't have a placard but I'm not a cop. It's not my job to bug people about minor infractions 🤷♂️
4 likes@dabomboo7o If you wouldn’t confront a stranger bawling out the mother of your children over a parking dispute, then you need your man card revoked.
0 likesAt minute 20:33 he forgot his arm was injured. He moves it in circular motion pretty well. Doesn't seem to bother him then
0 likesTo think that if he reacted reasonably it would be the other man being arrested for assault.
0 likesYeah he shouldn’t have shot... after he pulled the gun the father backed down and walked back and he still got shot
2 likesseems to me like this nut had firearm fascination. Felt it made him a big man who can go around poking people waiting to use his firearm! Almost as if he purchased the weapon with intentions to kill someone?
0 likesSecond degree murder, minimum. Prosecution went for the lesser crime to guarantee conviction. Too bad.
1 likehow come no more videos are being uploaded? i love these videos
0 likesHad the victim attacked after he shoved the perp down, this wouldn't be on YouTube as it would be justifiable homicide. His life was not in imminent danger. The victim wasn't armed as well.
0 likesHe clearly didn't realize there were surveillance turn the whole altercation
0 likesThat defense was fucking trash lmao thank god
0 likes"He wasn't happy when heard the guy died" he wasn't sad either
"Hurr durr the cameras are old don't represent what happened" you can see him get pushed over, the victim back away at the site of the gun, and the shot fire
"Uhh the cashier didn't know he had a gun" who cares and how's that relevant?
"Cashier described him as calm" just as i'm sure he was when he pulled the trigger and just as he was when he described the event to investigators, with a version full of cap
"There was clear reasonable doubt" my guy you can SEE the victim clearly back away
"One man is already gone, do you want to take another away" lmaoooooo really?
How I wish this prosecutor & jury were on the Casey Anthony case.
0 likesEverybody knows at least one guy like this: self appointed keeper of justice. The truly believe they are obligated to tell people they are not doing things the right way. Now it bugs me too when able-bodied people park in disabled parking spots. But unless I see a person with a visible disabled sticker (or 'placard' as junior G-man likes to call them) unable to park because an able-bodied person has occupied the spot, I'm not going to say anything. Even then, I'd like to think I'd be polite about it. After all, you never know a person's situation. There are plenty of reasons why they may not have a sticker displayed, or simply why they might need to park there. What I would not do is shoot a guy for defending his wife from some self righteous a$$hole.
0 likesThis guy exaggerates his hurt arm, puts it up on the table then forgets it's hurt and hides it again, makes a fake sling using his t-shirt, then proceeds to use his arm during the interrogation... Like I can't even right now...
1 likeThis man should of never fired his gun.. I understand being scared that a man bigger than you pushed you over but he had all control when he took out his fire arm and he definitely didn't have to shoot.
0 likesDetective - "I'm just going to ask you a few questions. Here's your shovel."
2 likesHope you do something with the Johnny Depp Amber Heard court trial
0 likesWow who reckons his lawyer actually believes the bs he is spouting the guy got pushed and killed a guy
0 likesYou can avoid so much drama and bullshit by just simply minding your own business
5 likesReplies (1)
💯💯💯
0 likesIt's sad knowing that if this guy was a police officer that got shoved to the ground there's no way he would have been convicted for murdering an unarmed person.
0 likesLock up and throw away key he took the time to shoot for the lungs he killshot him on purpose when he was backed off and not a treat it wasn't split seconds he had a full 2 seconds and he choose to murder like he was justified to
1 likeLove these vids and content. It sucks YT did you guys dirty. Glad you're coming back just please take it easy with the adds! Every 5 mins of this video there were adds. Super annoying
0 likesReplies (1)
Literally only 7 mins later and just had another freaking 2 adds! WTF!?
0 likes"Four prior road incidents where he threatened drivers with a gun." Why tf was this dude even allowed to have a firearm?
1447 likesReplies (44)
Florida's gun laws are extremely lax
65 likesFirst 2 victims didn’t press chargers, 3rd incident didn’t involve a gun but he was charged with aggressive driving, 4th incident happened at the same convince store with a truck driver parked in the handicap spot, he even rang the truck company saying he was going to blow his head off but no one reported it to police until after they saw the death of Markeis
98 likesFlorida
16 likesMurica.
33 likes2ND AMENDMENT BABYYYY
20 likes@Itay s I love it
3 likescause he is white
26 likes@Lara Coimbra lol you’re hilarious
12 likes@Lara Coimbra cry some more pls
12 likes@David de Cruz Had?
2 likes@Allan La Fontaine holy shit
1 likeSome people believe the right to carry arms also gives the right to kill. It's a mad mad country!
12 likesAmerican Exceptionalism my dude
4 likesCuz he's white
3 likes@Itay s WOP WOP he's in prison
1 likeEven dogs and pigs are allowed to have a gun in america.
1 likeBecause MUH MY SECOND AMENDMENT. That's 'murica for ya
6 likes@LostStarzOfTheSky as I'm from Tampa, I do think we need less relaxed laws, I want the freedom of protection, something thats a human right (the constitution made it not for that reason tho), but yeah after Drejka I think gun law needs to have psychiatry tests before issuing a gun.
1 likeBecause America
0 likes@Lara Coimbra what happened to your chin?
2 likesAmerica
0 likesThe way this is narrated, "Four prior road incidents where he threatened drivers with a gun, two were male, two were (emphasis in voice) FEMALE..." - is it worse to threaten females than males?
0 likes🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
0 likes@Greg Robinette
0 likesIt does sound like the prosecutor & jury got it wrong with George Zimmerman, he should have been convicted for something, because he did so many things wrong leading up to that and in the end, he shot a guy who did have business there and wasn't carrying anything more nefarious in his pocket than Skittles.
Somebody like Zimmerman makes the other gun owners look bad.
@David de Cruz gun rights not gun laws
0 likes@711honved guns weren't made for anything else homie
1 like@Reluctant Grower Haha playing the victim. Do something with your life if you haven’t already.
2 likes@Itay s ANY fool can own a gun
1 like@Eldred she right tho
1 like"Muh Freedums"
1 likeBecause he was never charged with or convicted of anything. In the United States, you have to go through due process to have your rights taken away.
3 likesBecoz Merica bro, yeehawww
0 likes@Allan La Fontaine yeah and i'd bet they didn't press charges out of fear of retaliation, had a situation like that before. In the process of pressing charges the accused has access to your home address and if that person will pull a gun in traffic who knows what could happen.
1 like@genki2genki you hit the nail on the head with your comment 👍
0 likes@Allan La Fontaine exactly. let this be a lesson. if one of those people hadn't taken the "no harm no foul" mentality and actually pressed charges, there's a good chance this would have never happened.
0 likesUSA
0 likesbecause AMERICAAA FUCK YEAH
1 like@Dave if he was black he wouldn’t have the gun anymore. He probably still be in jail. Can’t refute the facts…
0 likes@G you guys are not only ones who have lots of guns. In Europe there are pretty heavily armed counters yet we don't have problems like that. In whole history there are less school shootings in Europe then in US in a year, even if we count Russia. There is something wrong with your country that's it. That's great that you can own gun if its make you safe, but if all you need to kill someone and have no consequences is to say that you felt threatened... That's absurd, no wonder that you don't feel safe.
0 likesMerica
0 likesOne word, Florida.
0 likesBecause he's white
0 likesDepends on why he threatened them.
0 likes@Why We Love Film If he were black he would still have his guns and not be in prison. The first two people didn’t press charges. The third incident there was no gun. And the fourth was never reported.
0 likesThis white guy was definitely guilty of manslaughter.
BUT THERE IS NO RACISM INVOLVED IN THIS CASE. Definitely not the outcome right?
You say the “ so called 21 foot rule” like there’s no truth in this when in fact it’s well documented
0 likesReplies (1)
He never said it didn't have truth, its literally just a phrase to begin his explanation of it for people who don't know about it. He even described under what conditions you would be able to justify your actions based on said rule.
1 likeAh! I’m glad his shoulder miraculously healed after he realized he had to make up some bullshit to save his own ass.
0 likesHis pet peeve, people parking in handicap spots, my pet peeve, him rubbing his thumb and index finger together.
1 likeWhen man said "Neutralize," the cop sat up straight
0 likesIf your defense attorney is arguing that the video being SD and not HD means you can't trust its footage, your case probably is not very strong.
664 likesReplies (11)
Specifically in a case like this where one of the main arguments from Mr. Shooty is that the guy was walking towards him. Even SD video can show a footstep clear enough.
33 likes@Joseph Stauter Hell, the display on a TI-88 calculator could show that much.
14 likesI'm assuming his attorney is a court-appointed public defender (just started watching), but I hope he's not, honestly. Anybody having to deal with this guy and represent him in court deserves better pay than public defenders. yes I know it's awful that somebody even has to try to defend people like this, but it's the law and the foundation of our court system. The attorneys know there's no chance of winning, but somebody has to take the case. Usually an attorney in need of work/public defender.
They were trying to create any doubt they could in the jurors' minds. They knew they didn't have much of a case when they started.
1 likeif pixels have anything to do with not being able to see certain things in the footage, then it is an argument. Can't be your main one, but it can be used.
3 likesOr when you're arguing his reaction in the interview when he found out the guy he shot is dead. He didn't celebrate because he's not stupid. He's in front of two cops. He celebrates, that's an admission of guilt.
3 likescould be a valid excuse if there are a lot of artifacts present in the footage. could show something that clearly isn't happening on screen. definitely not the case for this footage though, but it could be valid for others.
2 likes@Kaas Perzik Agreed, but what people need to understand in this particular case is that the attorney is simply trying to create doubt, any doubt, especially when the client wants to take it to trial but there's not much to use for the defense. If he can cast doubt in just one juror's mind, that's all he needs to win the case. A defense attorney will advise a client with a bad case to settle or take a plea deal, but when the client refuses, they gotta do their job. Some clients just don't know what's good for them when they've already fucked everything up.
1 like@John Doe wasn't this guy represented by those NRA carry guard lawyers?
0 likesBasically lawyers paid to defend people that shoot people in 'apparent' self defense.
is it just me or does the defence attorney sound like Donald Trump (the way he stresses his words)
3 likes@Venalisa Yeah I noticed that, too.
1 likeHaha, true, even criticises the poor colour quality. Yeah youre going to jail bud.
0 likesDetective: "What kind of twitch was it?"
1 likeBill Burr fans: "Quick twitch!"
If he hadn’t had the gun he may or may not have approached the lady about being in the handicap spot but for sure that man would not have gotten shot and killed. It is mr drejkas fault for pulling the trigger, but who gave him the trigger to pull? Also yeah he was probably the type of guy that went to target practice every day. That close to the target he could have shot him anywhere to “neutralize the threat” , but he hit the guy in a spot that would kill him. And if I just found out somebody I injures accidentally had died because of me I would have been in tears. Michael didn’t even seem to care.
0 likesThis coward only felt ballsy with his gun. He would rather kill someone than get beat up.
2 likesThat lady during the defense is me during this whole interrogation
0 likesThat first detective wasn't lying about the other detectives being less handsome. Woof.
1 likeI'm sorry but who uses the word "expired" to describe someone's passing? It's a human being not a carton of milk. 🙄🙄
1 likeThat prosecutor though 👏
0 likesHe was itching to use that gun.
6 likesThis is a message to my fbi guy: These videos are really interesting, I swear I'm not planning anything
73564 likesReplies (443)
Planning what ?
367 likesYour 30 years Lompoc séjour ?
😂
She’s just planning to get a lawyer, it’s all good
1240 likesdon't park in the disabled spot
710 likesI actually laughed out loud at this.
377 likeslmao...same
101 likesWell played, that should throw them off the scent
395 likesWouldn't it be your NSA guy?
109 likes@Dan _ wtf is lompoc sejour
121 likeshahaha same, i went around listening to this, to Chris Hansen ''to catch a predator'' etc. I love the psychological aspect and how these subject weave their lies. If a FBI agent look at my youtube list, ill be thrown in jail
253 likesmhmmhm i believe u
19 likes@Dominic Lacroix I think most of us who follow these types of channels would be in the same boat. They can't come for us all, can they? Hey! At least if they get some of us, there will be new material for the others to watch!
183 likesRelax. Women are never held accountable for anything.
92 likesOmg girl I wrote nearly d same comment on another video, I love d way he stops n let's u know what's happening, bro has talent 💯💙💙💜💜
26 likesI was thinking the same thing.
9 likeslmao same, i just find human psychology interesting!
40 likes@SirKnight incel detected
175 likesTo my fbi guy: I concur
20 likesI'm sure he's watching
7 likesThe package has been delivered at our usual spot. I wasn't followed.
28 likes@Rayanna Gore i second this comment
2 likeskari c. Spinster/cat lady spotted
13 likesWell, I'm a fed and I'm STILL intrigued. Always have been. I watch to appreciate/criticize certain aspects. This cornflake using all those cop terms made me itch. Just a grown nerd
41 likesCandi S you’re not a fed you’re a full time YouTube watcher
34 likesGot some weird ass subscriptions
interacting with this comment so mine sees this
18 likes@rayanna gore If erbody who watched these types of videos/docs were flagged, about 1/4 of the entire population would be placed on a watch list. 👀💻
12 likesMy FBI guy lmao gtfoh
5 likesLmao
0 likesFBI agent: ...
18 likesMe: I'm a writer I swear!
Sounds exactly like something someone who was planning something would say.
19 likesDamn she bout to smoke her man
7 likesCoz you already did it. You just trying to figure out how to handle the cops.
3 likesyes
0 likesRiley Mosier facts 😂😂
0 likesYea seriously what she said lol
3 likesSuzanne Retallack i can tell youre a really rational, level headed critical thinker.
6 likesI feel like she’s the type of girl afraid to ask for more ketchup packets
7 likes😂😂
0 likesThey're are so entertaining. I'm starting to get concerned about myself. I have watched this for hours. All day yesterday 🤣😂😂
6 likesSame here!!! 😂
0 likes🤫🤫🤫
1 likeThatOneIntrovert probably cia before fbi I don’t think nsa does jack shit anymore than they have to. But idk I could be wrong, I was wrong once before. Well actually I wasn’t wrong, no see, it turns out I was just mistaken.
3 likesDavid Kinsella none of us have worry with that, we are just checking our facts as we go because we understand mid to middle intermediate English language, and that’s all ya gotta know!! Rack up a word for everything and then round up 2-3 synonyms and antonyms for each word a couple times memorize as much as possible and then the only fool for a lawyer is... well not me, I’m not a lawyer regardless of what I understand. I don’t know the law because it’s not readily available here for anyone (contestants batter up, east TN here) otherwise without snitches and innocent/guilty imbeciles they would make no further arrests. Ever: let’s find the key to this message; Miranda Rights means Miranda’s case was a case where he didn’t/couldn’t shut the fuck up, until he realized that he was actually in real time becoming a genius (he had no knowledge I’m sure, just a badass lawyer after the shit show he made) 😂
0 likes@josh cole Yeah because the meme was made by people who don't know about the government or cyber security
1 likeThe FBI doesn't monitor internet activity unless they are investigating you for a crime.
6 likesThe NSA does it passively.
@SirDistic I know, if you look in the comments section that's what I was saying!!
0 likesYoure not that important
3 likesFbi guy she's lying she tried to hire me as a goon
5 likesI like these for the human element. Working retail security you get to see all kinds of things.
2 likes@Dan _ down south they call it longpoke
0 likeslmao fr same
0 likesEveryone loves some good true crime
1 likeLol
0 likesIt’s cool, we know
0 likesI had that joke on vinyl
1 likeget out of my head woman
3 likes@Franchise Player grow up
4 likes@Just_Nate_Dogg are u jealous
0 likesI'm into true crime and I worry about this sometimes lol
0 likeswait, do we get our very own FBI person? Can we name them? omg, can i take it home with me???!!
6 likesThey're watching me too after that cookbook I looked at when I was 14 or so.
4 likesConfused ...
0 likes@SirKnight now THAT was funny 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
0 likesI swear I always think the same thing. It is ok, because we always watch different videos.
0 likes🤣💯on god
1 likeLmao i was thinkin the same thing
0 likesHeh... My message? "You'll never catch me"
0 likesGod mood! I’ve been sucked into these videos for like three days
0 likesThis is avaliable on youtube so your okayy
2 likesFml same here😂😂😂
0 likesU planning to oversmart the system CIA knows it 😂
1 likehahahahhaha same im also thinking about that whlie watching this kind of vifeos 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1 likeHaha =D
0 likesYessir
1 like😆😂
0 likesWhy would someone think you’re planning something over a murder case video on YouTube? 🤣
2 likesI concur with you
0 likessounds pretty guilty bro👀
0 likes@Amanda Kuhlman 🤣🤣🤣
0 likesI ordered a blink 182 shirt from Russia I'm pretty sure I'm being followed and it might be that aliens do exist. According to my FBI guy.
1 likeI am actually planning to join law enforcement so its alright i guess
0 likesright? lol
0 likesarrest her
1 likeHAHAHAHAHAH😂
0 likesYAS QUEEN. THAT WAS SO ORIGINAL. YOU DO YOU
2 likesWouldn't it be your NSA guy?
0 likesFBI are the true crooks
0 likesMe neither, me neither ha ha ha haaaaaa ha ha haaaaaa Hahaha HAAAAAAA HAW HAW HAW CAW CAW CAAAAAAAW!?!!??! wait I didn't mean to write the maniacal laughing out loud, damn it too late now, cats out the bag I guess.
0 likesok no worries
0 likeswait was i supposed to say that. fuck now theyre after me now
same LMAO
0 likesIm starting to see you on most of his videos im surprised his content aint free
0 likessame, please don't suspect anything
0 likesYep ignore that my search history is deleted and stopped I’m not hiding nothing
1 likeTo my FBI agent: I am planning something and you can’t prove what it is
0 likesLMAO 🤣 same
0 likesGot your own handler eh?
0 likesLOL FOR REAL
0 likesSo you're expecting a "spur of the moment" situation huh... Watch out for the twitch.
0 likesLmao same, the worst thing I'll ever do is speeding
0 likes@Turbhoe HD Remix Well the worst I'd ever do now is speeding.. But that's after spending 4 years in federal prison..
0 likesRay, you're like 14. FBI don't care.
1 like🤣🤣🤣
0 likesI am tho
0 likesNice try! You wanna tell us your real intentions the easy way or the hard way?
0 likesYou have a sus last name, and I have a sus first name. And no, that's not the beginning of a pick-up line; just an observation. 😇😂
0 likesCome to think of it, my last name is sus, too, since it's almost pronounced like "Insane". Lol
1 like“my fbi guy” lmao
0 likesLMAO SAME
0 likes@Candi S most of the population is on a watchlist anyways 😂
1 likeLmfao
0 likes@Omar Exactly. They even up on catchin u spelling shyt out. If u on the 📱 or email, don’t think just cuz u spelled out bizzzyizzzyomb instead of just sayin it, that erthing sweet. I know all the bangers and boosters WISH they had a time machine to beam their azzes back to when there were no CCTVs damn near in on er block, country full of semi-pro phone cameramen and computer, financial and med forensics. I idk y peep even bother anymore. 🤷🏻♀️ 😜
0 likesHahaha yes!
0 likesRight lol
0 likesIt's sad to me that this is now a real joke..
0 likesHahahaha!
0 likesLMAO
0 likesLol
0 likesto my fbi: me too
0 likesHahaha
0 likesCopied comment?
0 likesSaw it on the last one of these videos I watch.
Maybe you copied it, or maybe someone else copied from you. Either was, please make your own jokes, people. I don’t like the culture of comment stealing.
They are watching you now for sure 😂
0 likesThe fbi keeps track of herpies super spreaders ? Damn crazy world these days ......
0 likes🤣🤣
0 likesYou better hope nothing happens to your boyfriend now 😇
0 likesNSA guy*
0 likes@Hickory Dickory calm down Dickory
0 likes@ThatOneIntrovert you are the imposter
0 likesFucking dead lmao 💀
0 likesp
0 likes🤣😂
0 likesHahahaahahahahaha
0 likesI was thinking the same thing 🤣
BROOOOOOO SAME
0 likes😂
0 likesbe careful what you say here....these are incriminating evidence
0 likesHahah omg the relatability tho 😂 I’ve been binge watching this channel the realized my watch history.
0 likes😅😅😅😅😅
0 likesI am simply fascinated by human behavior, so, FBI, if you need analysts and interrogators..
0 likes@IcebergSlim 423 being mistaken and being wrong are the same thing.
0 likes@Mike Devyne oh I remember that cookbook , I skimmed through it quickly because a friend was showing it off. The A n a r c h.... 👨🍳 📚
0 likesLol nice 👏
0 likesYour FBI guy?...........how come I don’t have an FBI guy, why have I been singled out?
0 likesis your surname really gore, as in Al Gore, or are you one of those gore enthusiasts on those creepy snuff film websites?
0 likessame lmao
0 likesSAME
0 likeslast name gore, likes to hear gory stories. interesting.
0 likeslol
0 likesThis comment is on every video
0 likesYou mean CIA 😂
0 likesShe gets it, well done
0 likesspeak for yourself, im definitely planning some shit 😈
0 likesAre using a computer or phone ?😹😹😹😂the fbi investigating you rn like 👀👀👀
0 likesSilly 😀
0 likesLmfaoooll my fbi guy must be thinking the same lmfaooooo
0 likesNot funny, didn't laugh
0 likesHahaha right ??
0 likesComing from someone with the last name Gore 🤔🧐🤫
1 likeYou shouldn’t have to say that...
0 likesmy google search history got a bit weird too, with me searching for things like "first degree murder sentence"
0 likessame lol
0 likesaltho if i ever get in this situation i know what to do ( witch i wont )
0 likesUnderstandable.
2 likes😂😂😂😂😂😂
0 likesThis is the second or third time I’ve seen it. It’s like I’m really studying the crimes 😂 just cant get enough true crime.
0 likesi dont get it ? why would fbi be interested.
0 likes@ThatOneIntrovert she's went ahead to when she's already a person of interest
0 likes-yet
0 likessame dude 😂😂
0 likesBEST comment
0 likesPlaning on going to jail
0 likesi’m aware that’s a joke but it’s rooted in real narcissism. check yoself rayanna
0 likesWould love to see you in future episode.
0 likes@Just_Nate_Dogg My thoughts EXACTLY!!
1 likeSounds like someone broke your heart. Your better than that. You are writing things that are stupid. Dont go to prison. Have fun with that.
0 likesMade me laugh.
0 likessame @FBI!
0 likesSame
0 likessame,
0 likesCringe
0 likes2nd Amendment, Right to bear baby!
0 likeshahahaha
0 likes^
0 likes😭🤣🥂classic 🇯🇲
0 likesSays no one ever .....
0 likesYea, same. The algorithm is trying to tell me something
0 likesMe too FBI guy
0 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likesSAME
0 likesRayanna,hey. How ya doin?
0 likesNSA lol
0 likesGirl are crazy
0 likeshahahaha me either lol
0 likesI agree ..this is interesting, educational...Some of it is hard to listen to ..yet so intriguing.
0 likesSame.
0 likesYou're white you're not a threat to anyone but yourself
0 likesOmg I've been thinking the same thing. Watching crime documentaries one after the other, googling shit I don't understand. They'll probably investigate tf out of me and I'll probably say stupid things and go to jail for just watching these. 😭😂
0 likesI buy books about serial killers, true crime, etc. I also buy cookbooks. I assume the salespeople talk about me after I leave.
0 likesYou do
0 likesI’ve told my husband he can feel 100% safe permanently. I’ve read enough crime accounts to know I couldn’t pull off his murder.
0 likesSo your not planning any more insurrections this year ?
0 likesIndeed. Fascinating content!
0 likesI don't want to be around to find out 🙃
0 likesYou know what? Never thought I’d have to think about that.
0 likesFacts I second thy statement
0 likesSame here lol
0 likesSpeak for yourself!! Some of us are planning things 😂😆
0 likes@Eroldo89 😂😂😂
0 likesSame but I also study psychology 😅
0 likesIt’s true agent :)
0 likesScouts honor
0 likes@Okami-Rose If just watching true crime content gets you on a secret police file... you probably don't live in a "free country'.
1 like@Amanda Kuhlman In a truly free country nobody would ever be afraid that the security state have a file on them for simply watching true crime content. It's kind of sad how normal it has become to accept that level of paranoia.
0 likesThis is ahem definitely not your FBI agent. Could you maybe tell me what you’re planning so I can ahem get in on it too?
0 likesYah
0 likesSame. FBI guy if your seeing this, this guys videos are just really interesting and im trying to watch long stuff to stay up cus i messed up my sleep schedule. LOL
0 likesTrue crime is a popular genre. You think they keep tabs on everyone who watches videos like this?
0 likesI be saying the same thing💀💀
0 likesThere's nothing wrong with us having a deep interest or fascination in the psychology of a "fill in the blank," criminal mind. I've seen multiple cases and I find the interrogation very interesting. Part of me wants to get into law enforcement and another part me makes me realize I cannot handle this type of work. The victims stories are absolutely devastating to me and I get to a point as a viewer that I cannot watch too many of these videos as it takes a toll on my well being. So with that being said, I have the utmost respect for the officers who take these cases in pressing for justice.
0 likesIn the cases of paedophiles or other sex offenders walking that fine line of sociopath/psychopath, I wish there were an alternative to life without parole or death penalty.. I was thinking more along the lines of amputation.. Like removing their hands and feet.. Arms or legs so they can NEVER even think about committing any crime again as they physically cannot.. This would declog the justice system significantly..
Of course this guy shouldn't get that extreme.. But I'm referring to the more hanus acts on humankind. I can think of two cases where removing the limbs of these criminals would suffice.. 1) Nikko (forgot last name) and any child sex offender.. Yea.. Chop them hands off plz!!
@ThatOneIntrovert lol your display pic kills me.. Haha.. Dude
0 likesAlso.. 🐘 in the room 😆 we all commented on this as the op is 🔥 😆 op is nsa
0 likes@S Z 🤣🤣🤣
0 likesI like otttones comment lol!
0 likes@Isaac Brown who moi?😂
0 likesI don't know what what to be more worried about you or the 19,000 people that like this comment
1 likeHenrique Armani 😂😂
0 likesS Z Lmao these responses have me dying. He said you have some weird YouTube subscriptions 😂
1 like@Shi La simp
1 likeTony Dean Get in the shower and stop @ me 😩
0 likes@Shi La lol what does that mean
0 likes😂😂😂 me too
0 likesIm thinking Im now an expert... But I will reserve my right to remain silent
0 likes@Andri Þór I did too
0 likesLmao
0 likesDo you mean NSA?
0 likes@kari c. he probably is but like, rape charges for men are way higher than women. Along with almost every other crime.
0 likesNo mention of the fact that it wasn't his job to be the Parking Space Badge Wearer and intimidate the car users, whether they were supposed to be parked there or not.....
0 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likesFrom your FBI Guy: You might wanna get popcorn in that case I've been chowing down
0 likesI have got message from your fbi guy. "That's what some planning something would say."
0 likesLearn from others mistakes how to be a better killer
0 likes@Franchise Player yikes
0 likesWhen I’m stoned I feel that way.
1 likeI am the fbi guy and I will catch you one day🧐
1 likeHaha 😂 me too these vids are addictive for the innocent 😇
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likesTacos without cheese isnt a taco...its a disapointment
0 likes!!!!!!
0 likesYeah girl don’t. This comment will be used in court against you
0 likes@rayannagore
0 likesI'm with you! If anything else, watching these videos just makes me realize I would suck at trying to commit then cover up a crime.
@Dennis Golesz 😆
0 likes@BINGEBOY 🤣🤣🤪😵
0 likesFbi
0 likesFn
Big
Indian
U r 🔥
1 like@Ottone III Lol, keep away from the parking spots. They cause trouble.
0 likes@Dominic Lacroix Me too, most definitely. It wouldn’t even take 3 days for my trial, Lol
0 likes@Amanda Kuhlman I know, right, Lol
0 likes@Qgal5kap123 Lol
0 likesI dont think you'd ever be suspected. More likely, men like me who are in their late 20s and live alone would be a much bigger red flag.
0 likesBut I'm not gonna do anything either.
0 likes@Amanda Kuhlman I guess we can all sit behind bars together and watch how everyone got there
1 like@Henrique Armani federal prison big dog
0 likes@kari c. the exact same thing crossed my mind lol
0 likesNoted
0 likesKAYZE PLAYZ the amount of these videos that would have been no contest if they just said “lawyer please”
0 likesME TOO
0 likes@Dominic Lacroix hahaha same, i find the psychology behind it very interesting, I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who's thought about what would whoever sees my youtube history think about these videos lol!
2 likesWay to put it on social media. FYI look at this chick
0 likesI am planning something
0 likesthey dont care about what youre doing. it's just mass data collection just in case you actually do something.
0 likes✅✅✅
0 likesHe died because of his own bad decision
0 likesI tried telling my mom about the “fbi worker” watching each persons phone joke and she thought I was insane. I can’t stand millennial humour it’s like their brains don’t understand anything LOL
0 likesHa ha ha, I always think that, when I'm watching these
0 likesmy dad had loads of books about real life murders and we used to joke if my mum went missing, the police would see those books and start lifting the floorboards.
0 likesThen Fred West got charged with murdering about 20 women and their bodies were found in chimneys and walls and under the floorboards, he got rid of every single book.
Fax fbi I ain’t doing anything just mad interesting.
0 likesDear FBI agent, this ^
0 likesliterally made my day :D
0 likesUSP Bih Sandy
0 likesI hope we have the same guy, cuz I've fallen down a deeeeep hole!!!! lmao!
0 likesyesyes same pls dont be sus
1 likeYeah Im not planing anything either😉
0 likes@pais :3 if we all have the same guy, they seem pretty chill... 😏🤣😜
0 likesSaaaaame! I’m wondering how many I can watch before I’m on some sort of list
0 likesSAME
0 likesSame
0 likesLmfaooo omg noooo
0 likesNSA*
0 likes"I Swear I'm not planning to do anything fbi guy" gets shot 47 times and dump under a river in 6 pieces FBI agent: It was a suicide
0 likesnooooooo!!! 🤣🤣🤣
0 likes@RayannaGore that chick looks like stormfront from the boys tv show
0 likesFacts LMAO
0 likeslol right... me too!
0 likesLOL SAME
0 likesMy FBI guy puts this shit in my feed for real
0 likesLast name doesn’t check out 😂
0 likesJesus Christ, i've been interested in true crime since i was like 11, i wonder if i'm on a watchlist
0 likesOk, I leave you alone.
0 likesLove, FBI guy
if i ever get investigated watrching these will serve the exact opposite lmfao
0 likesdetective hands me water bottle
me
this is clearly a reverse psychololgy ploy to befreind me and gain my trust refuse the water
officer your just here to describe the fence that you saw a driver run into son your not here as a suspect you signed a witness waiver
me'
clearly im a prime suspect in this case now.
me too fbi guy
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likes@SirKnight . Then why are there women’s prisons?
0 likesYes, merely for entertainment. I'm not trying to learn from these people's short comings to make it more likely I can get away with murder.
0 likesHello babe
0 likesTHANK YOU FOR SAYING IT FOR ME
0 likesYa same wink wink
0 likesNice try, Ms. GORE.
1 likeYou think I wouldn't notice that? That you've got "gore" in your name?
@Montpelier Montgomery ha ha nice
0 likeslmao they like
0 likes"......hmmmmm a suspicious statement"
Yeah me neither
0 likes@nadine kayla #TheFam yeah he eat food in d kitchen and watches d tv during the hours he be awake in d house and d white man jealoh
0 likesHaha yes they are I'm just at home daily bored 😂
0 likesI would also like to let my fbi guy know these interrogation and criminal videos are just interesting and nothing more.
0 likesHer FBI man, tell mine that too pls 😂
0 likesToo late.
0 likesREAL FUCKING SHIT
0 likesExactly see this is what I wanted to say (to my FBI guy)
0 likesSUS
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likessame, i watched a shit ton recently
0 likes@SirKnight yes cuz they are the ones being killed or raped most of the times🙃
0 likesDitto
0 likesSame 😭😂
0 likesLikes would be 15k or less with a male profile pic
0 likes@SuperSaiyan Zero how do you figure that? A funny comment is a funny comment.
0 likesI am;)
0 likeshonestly
1 likeRight there with you
1 likeHe shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
0 likes@Michael Zomsuv dude had sevral times he pulled a gun and threatened people with a gun...he was playing cop....and got his ass checked....he shouldve called the cops on them parking in a handicap space. He wanted to be a cop so bad that he was playing a cop in rl
0 likesI click on these videos thinking they really need a juicy title but I'm bored I'll take a peek Then I end up watching the whole thing
1 liketerrible. but hilarious
1 likeI dont understand?
0 likes@Nick During Obama era, there was a huge controversy about fbi and government spying on american citizens. Obama was backing up the fbi to use social media data and phone conversations basically violating basic human rights. The joke is that we all have an fbi guy spying on us.
0 likesFBI guy gonna start building a romantic interest. He might still be 187ed
0 likes@Michael Zomsuv it's been that way since Bush dumbbell. The "Patriot Act" was the ultimate spy bill. Has nothing to do with Obama or Bush or whoever. They all want more power over us. Wake TF up
0 likesI have my eye on you.
0 likesFr 🤣🤣🤣
0 likesLOOK , I FOUND A FUNNY GIRL
0 likesyour name puts you in a tough spot
0 likesI mean even Jeff's interrogation?
0 likesBAHAHHAHAHAHHA
0 likesWhy specify huh maybe you are planning something?
0 likes@Ottone III how about don’t murder people?
0 likesDont worry youre a woman so youre most likely not even gonna go to jail
0 likes@Michael Zomsuv keep in mind he shoved hin because he was being aggresive towards his wife and child....he was tough then...and when confronted by a man was scared to death...anyone being aggresive towards my wife and child would probaly get more than a shove.dud e was walking away when he got shot...mike had NO business with a gun...he felt powerful with a gun and approaching people that was proven in court...theres a reason he will live in prison untill hes a old man.
0 likes@gray in fact, when you look in to the defenition of a incel im quite the opposite, and neither am i salty or sad. My life is going great and i got a loving bf.
0 likescant wait to watch you in a video
2 likesjk
Right?! I was thinking that too.... like damn.... they’ll think I’m up to something with all these YouTube videos I watch lol
0 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesWhat she said
0 likesHey Rayanna's FBI guy! Just wanted to let you know there's no need to open a case for me as well! xD
1 like@KAYZE PLAYZ mhm
0 likes1/4 of the population IS on a watch list
0 likesPretty much the entire population is on a watch list. Ubiquitous surveillance infrastructure and big data fusion centers weren’t built for nothing.
0 likesLukas, being not that important is the problem. The system is set up to protect the “important” at the expenses of the “not important”, which is the vast majority of the population
0 likeseverytime im watching one of these videos i genuinely get that feeling im not even kidding lmfao i watched a lot of murder cases lately cause it interests me and im interested to know what goes on in these peoples minds (even though its very hard to tell) and every time i watch one i have that thought lmfao
0 likesI want to learn how to identify people lying to me
0 likesSame
0 likesHaha now that the FBI is reading this comment thread. I swear I'm just curious 🥴🤣
0 likes😭
0 likesExcuse us?
0 likesI'm on my girlfriend's connection, they must thinks she's a complete psychopath.
0 likes@SteelioNow ya think?
0 likesLmao me
0 likesLOL
0 likes😉
0 likesThis is BS, he had the right to shoot that guy, the guy just assaulted him.
0 likes@Dan _ eeerereerereeeeeeeee edd e” I think I got a see
0 likesSame I’ve been binging these 👻
0 likesI can’t wait to see the video here about you soon!
0 likesVouch
0 likesLol.
0 likesSame.
0 likesI was thinking just the same lmao
0 likestheres no way thats your name
0 likesBacking this up
0 likes*NSA guy
0 likesDear My FBI Guy: I hold a B.S. in Psychology and going for my Masters, trust me this is just research!! lol
1 likePlease don’t come after me FBI dude.
0 likesThe fact that u even had to make this post is questionable 😂
0 likesbut if I were planning anything, these videos help a lot lmao
0 likes😂😂😂 for real
0 likesretweet.
0 likesI second this.. nothing going on here
0 likesSame
0 likesi concur 🤚🏼
0 likesSame
0 likes@Amanda Kuhlman my interrogation will be awesome I promise!! 😂
1 like@Holly A. Fabulous! Keep us entertained, please! I'm sure you know what to do!
1 like@Amanda Kuhlman I sure do! 😂 I won’t let you down! 😉
1 likeStop being basic
0 likescringe
1 likelmao same here
0 likesYea such a good way not to be watched by your government. By making a joke looking totally not suspicious.
0 likes@ThatOneIntrovert people still dont know who Snowden is or why they should. Legit people think they're not actually being monitored lol.
0 likesLmfao same asf 😭😭🤣
0 likesFacts.
0 likesLMAO yes same
0 likesRelatable🤣
0 likesExactly what someone who's planing something would say
1 likeHahah swear I been thinking the same thing cause my google searches are looking kinda crazy after watching these
1 likeThis is a message to my fbi guy: all my posts are serious, i am a threat to society
1 likeTbh I’ve been thinking of doing petty crime just so I can see how I’d fare during interrogation. Not sure who’d interrogate someone over petty crime, but fuck it: If nothing else, I’ll have a decent supply of candy bars.
0 likesyo same dont call fbi im just interested
0 likesRight here officer, this comment right here
0 likes@SirKnight lol this
0 likesLol funny
0 likes🤣 🤣 🤣
0 likesDid you ever have a dog called Doggy Dog?
0 likesi second this fbi guy
0 likes😭
0 likesHey fbi guy! Yeah me too ditto
0 likesAa
0 likesSame 🤣🤣
0 likesSame
0 likesThis one right here sir
0 likesLiterally 😂 I hope he sees this
0 likesI'm saying the same stuff on the phone when I fuck around with mates😂 just to be sure
0 likesThanks for clarifying, rayanna
0 likesNAH SAME😁😭
0 likesyes everyone has a guardian agent watching over them, a fbi guy...
0 likesThat's what they all say...
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likesThese were exactly my thoughts 😂 when i started whatching these awesome videos starting with "what pretendin to be crazy looks like"
0 likesYou should be more worried about the CIA and NSA. The fbi typically investigates after the crime is already committed
0 likes😂
0 likesWho’s your fbi guy ? Wtf
0 likesYou’re gorgeous
0 likesYeah same xD
0 likesTo my FBI guy: fuck off and let me mind my own business 4th Amendment should cover internet privacy
0 likesSo you're funny and cute 😅
0 likesWhiterun Guard: I've got my eye on you.....
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likesSure, same here
0 likesSAME LMAO
0 likesThis makes you so sus after that
0 likesOk glowie
0 likesAhahahah
0 likesLol
0 likesLook at the cops outside
0 likesLOCK UP THE HOUSE
The black guy took a running start and pushed him hard from behind, gave him whiplash and then was looking at him like, what's up!??? Pulled up his shorts again and was ready to fight, waiting for him to get up so he can punch him.
0 likesSo to say that guy was the victim is ridiculous. I am a liberal but I am so tired of people on both sides not being objective and honest.
lmao this is my fear
0 likesShit.... same!!
0 likesMessage to my fbi dude: I'm absolutely planning something.
0 likesI'm gonna commit tax fraud and you cannot stop me.
Rayanna that's a pretty name hope you don't mind me saying.
0 likesHe literally has training that made him think homicide was the proper action... like the worse advertisement for gun rights ever... and he laughs about using a gun as a "force multiplier"... yikes
1 likeI might add that every time he grabs his water is preparing to lie and it seems like self soothing behavior
0 likesthis guy reeks of someone who spends all their time in tacticool vigilante fantasy
1 likeIm very happy to see this. I lived in st Pete when this happened and remembered them releasing him and me think that was the end of it. I'm glad he got found guilty. Im going to check his sentence now.
2 likes"Negative."
1862 likes"Affirmative."
"Neutralize."
"Force multiplier."
Who talks like that?
Replies (104)
"he's taking his step!"
80 likesAn American
113 likesFake tough guys who are weak and insecure about it, so they get into hacky pseudo-military lingo to try to sound tough and decisive, when in reality, as in Michael's case, he's just a ball-less coward with a peashooter.
258 likes@Junny Conner had nothing to do with race in my opinion. Just a hyped up man too eager to pull a trigger
84 likes@Adam Stiff, dont forget that America has a lot of real supersoldiers too. Think Delta Force, Seal Team 6, Pararescuers, etc. Also dont forget that America has the most powerful military in the world. Kinda hard to have all that with just a bunch of wanna-be super soldiers and none of the real deal. With all the countries that hate America, amazing how none of them have bothered to try to take America on in a war. The whole world knows that would be suicide for anyone.
17 likes"Sheepdogs"
2 likes@Thomas Gambro Adamsson STAHP
1 likeYour mom
13 likesSometimes people who are raised in military families talk this way. My dad kinda talks this way and he’s a sweet heart lol
11 likes@Junny Conner I’ve seen people of all creeds talk like this so don’t be racist. It’s an unhealthy gun enthusiast trying and failing to get on the level of law enforcement.
23 likes@Adam Stiff Super soldier? What is this? Captain America? 🤣
5 likesAn ammosexual
9 likesHe'd get along with Jeremy dewhitt. Surprised he didn't say "Sargent"
2 likes@bernier alexandre don't bring cops into this please u don't fight discrimination and hate with more discrimination and hate in my area there was a shooting were 2 cops were killed 2 years ago we still have flags that say Gilchrist remember to honor those cops who gave their lives but I've seen please who praise the shooter for killing the cops yet my town trenton has only ever had 3 murders in its 150 year old history which were the 2 cops and the shooter he was kill by back up police in a gun fight it pains me to see people disrespect police
4 likes@Pixio lol underated comment
0 likesSomeone who believes they are an authority figure.
2 likes@Roddy Piper's Irritated Corneas nail on the head
0 likesThat’s the kind of talked that should keep you from owning a firearm.
2 likes@Junny Conner stop seeing racism everywhere
4 likes"Extricate myself from the situation"
4 likes@Adam Stiff maybe not, but he does have privilege
0 likes@Farhan Chowdhury I cried thought-out 8 mile. Such a great movie.
4 likesRoanoke Gaming lmao/
0 likesA little dork who wants to impress the cops
3 likesSomeone who wants to be a bigger man than he is
2 likesAs an actual Soldier, I was cringing throughout the video whenever he said "Roger", "Affirmative", etc. That's some straight up cultural appropriation.
5 likes@Junny Conner yeah y u gotta mention race ?
1 likeThe Terminatior
1 likeHim.
1 likeJeremy Dewitte
1 likeA range ninja, macho dirt bags that think they’re super soldiers because they bought gun and a camouflage jacket.
2 likesguy knew about yt safe words before they got implemented..
0 likes@2and900 - War Thunder Weekly
0 likesYeah, the Hollywood war movies propaganda does that to the feeble-minded
Someone with prior military experience, or a pretender.
1 likeAmericans
1 likeBattlefield 4 players.
1 likemy driving instructor did - it was annoying
0 likesWho talks like that? A 48 year old man who has learned and realized he lives in a dangerous world and ain’t playing games.
0 likesSomeone that thinks they are a badass, while at the same time getting all of their "training" from YouTube videos and batshit crazy gun forums online.
0 likesGamers.
1 like@Christopher Jacobs there's no way he's law enforcement or military
2 likes@General Leigh you sound like you would buy one if those "Too old to fight, too fat to run, so brother when I fight it ain't gonna be fair yeehaw giddyup" type shirts from a truck stop. Being old and scared isn't an excuse to shoot someone at the first sign of a confrontation
3 likesKillers?
0 likesNo remorse. He was planning to do this for a long time.
1 likeroanoke gamine talks like that.
1 like@Alex Winters name exactly what privilege this man has? Like is it privileged of getting a job just for his skin color? Or privilege of playing victim? So what is it? White privilege he would never have been arrested or found guilty!
0 likesA wanna be; thats who. You can hear it in the way he talks. The way he says he goes to that station every day and checked the car for handicap plates as if he has some right to dictate who parks where. On top of the fact he parks illegally to confront them
1 like@Farhan Chowdhury overweight doesn't mean fat. There's a lot of people who are over weight by a little bit. Or perhaps all the extra weight is muscle, or whatever. And these studies aren't always 100% accurate. Ther is a margin of error. The people in the U.S army, Navy and Airforce would have to be well trained and adept even if they were to be overweight by a little bit. Regardless, I still think that over half of America's people can hike that far. Or do even better.
0 likes@Aaron Smith japan did
0 likes@Brigham Cardon
0 likesI’m not a physical fighter and I’m not dumb enough to let myself get beat to death.
@Galacticz Randomizer if you don't know any physical activity consistently like lifting heavy objects consistently, you don't have above average muscle mass.
1 likeI'm reffering to the general.Americwn public. And most veterans let them selves go mainly because many of them have service connected injuries and.chronic pain to contiuenly being active.
@bernier alexandre please stop everyone's lives matter even cops
1 like@Aaron Smith You're just wrong on so many levels I don't even know what to say.
1 likeWannabe tough guy militia/military/law enforcement types. IMHO, he's trying to impress the cops with how "professional" he is, and place himself on the same level as them in their eyes.
1 likeI have a friend who's a police dispatcher, and they've said that these type of guys are a dime a dozen. They spew pseudo-military/law enforcement lingo, (usually incorrectly) but they're almost always just wannabe weekend warrior poseurs.
@Roddy Piper's Irritated Corneas THIS.
0 likesI just wrote a reply that's so similar to this that I even used a lot of the same words you did.
@Manecki Neckbeard hence why it was hilarious when the detective told him he doesn't know what a "force multiplier" was.
1 like@Dan C This!
1 likeI was an EMT, and most of the folks I did my medic training with were law enforcement, firefighters and/or former military. Out of all of them, only one guy (who had briefly served in the reserves) consistently talked like this. All the other actual military and LE people called him "Soldier of Fortune" or "Weekend Warrior" behind his back, and considered him a chickenshit poser.
Call of duty players
2 likesSomeone who has dreamed of the day that he could draw and use his weapon.The worst person to have a concealed permit.
1 likeA wannabe cop/soldier talks like that
1 like@Brooke Nance you keep some of the lingo. Time. Military alphabet. Affirmative, negative, etc.
0 likesEducated people, (like me, but not like you), speak that way.
0 likesThe characters in csgo. (Video game)
0 likes@Christopher Jacobs , he’s a “retired” tree trimmer.
0 likes@Farhan Chowdhury The generations are getting more dumb, it's rather... Unfortunate.
0 likes@Roddy Piper's Irritated Corneas now you just making things up, hes trying to use language that he things will help his connect and gain the trust of the people above him, nothing more nothing less
0 likesRepublicans
1 like@Simply_Based you must make a conscious and moral decision every day to dedicate, equip and prepare yourself to thrive in that toxic, corrosive moment when the illegal handicap parker comes knocking at the door
0 likesRobocop
1 likeA boomer who wants to pretend they're some kind of special operative.
1 like@Roddy Piper's Irritated Corneas if it were a peashooter it wouldn’t have killed that guy
0 likes@Farhan Chowdhury in fairnes I’m outta shape and 290 and was in the front of my hiking buddies for a 22 mile trail. That being said i was FEELIN that hike
0 likes@dashry 💯🤝
0 likes@Alex Winters 🙄
0 likes@John Turner 🤣🤣🤣
0 likesA wannabe cop
1 likeDude got what shot acting tuff lol
1 like@Aaron Smith I mean, there was the whole Iraq War in recent years, but most of that was miscommunication and lying about the area. Point is a group tried to fight America knowing the risks and lost.
0 likesAfter all, the US was literally made after a bunch of farmers fought the world’s strongest military.
Jeremy dewitte
1 like@2psah2 and cod players
1 like@Aaron Smith Name one proper success of your ''most powerful army'' in the world.
0 likes@Adam Stiff and what are other countries full of?
0 likes@Aaron Smith he knows that he's just jealous
0 likesSomebody that took being in the army to seriously.
0 likesYoutubers. Roanoake Gaming is the first one that comes to mind.
0 likes@Thomas Gambro Adamsson Arma players
0 likes@Adam Stiff It's the race that makes a person like this hyped up though. So, it could actually be about race since Black men are looked apon so negatively in general. Trayvon Martin, for example, wasn't a threat. It was the stereotype of being Black that got him killed though.
0 likes@Christopher Jacobs Damn man, care to tell us your experience?
0 likes@Christopher Jacobs Ahhh. Care to link these? I'm interested
0 likesA guy who plays too much call of duty
1 likeA concealed carrier
1 likeThat's pretty basic formal American English. That's how people at gun ranges talk.
1 likeThe guy on Active Self Protection says it all the time. It’s for wannabe combat people
2 likes@Brooke Nance people that volunteer to go fight people are not swearhearts lmao
0 likes@Christopher Jacobs in what country, exactly, do you think that would happen?
0 likesPsychopaths with no empathy.
0 likesliterally half of america. this is what happens when material things and hollywood movies rule your society
2 likesAs a proud American, not only do I not talk like that, I don’t like this guy
1 likeGerman Shepherds.
0 likes@John Turner correctly
0 likesCertainly not the sheriff!
0 likes@bernier alexandre he doesn't love you
0 likesDwight Shrute
0 likesBuzz Lightyear
1 likeImagine killing an unarmed man because of a handicap placard...
1 likePeople who buy guns are itching for the opportunity to use them. I talk with many people who support gun laws and that is the general consensus that I get from them. If they get the opportunity, they will use it. The concerning thing is what qualifies as an opportunity in your eyes vs. The eyes of the law
0 likesMan, just look at him absolutely MILK the fact that his arm is "hurt".
2 likes-Support
1 like-Tryna play the victim when he's clearly in the wrong since the guy had nothing in his hands and he was protecting his family. Jail him.
"was he this close?" "No, even further than that." Oh man you did not help your case at all with that one.
1626 likesReplies (6)
Yep
5 likesYea. Why the f did he say that. Think he couldve lied cos camera recording wouldn't be that accurate
6 likes@DME Not really, cops can probably recreate the scene where the crime took place based off the video footage lmao
15 likesMy thoughts were that when he said that, he was trying to say that when he was pushed, we was pushed that far away from him. Not that he was that far away that he wasn’t a threat.
3 likesI mean he was being honest, so what?
1 like😅 so still accurate enough
0 likesCould you imagine if this guy was a cop????
1 likeEvery lawyer watching this is pulling the hair out of their head.
1 likeI think he shot the other guy because he's image was damaged in he's hood at he's store. Like he said he come's there every day. He was embarrassed because of getting pushed over i think. Some people shouldnt be allowed to carry guns !
0 likesThe way he shows the cop his boo-boo lol. Like his scraped elbow was proof of some violent, over the top assault of hyper violence.
0 likesHow it went in his mind:
“That’s when I got this…” <points to elbow>
<cop projectile vomits all over himself>
"Paramedics arrived within 19 minutes..."
189 likesJeez. The national average, I think, is around 7 minutes. There's lots of reasons that can cause a delay, but regardless this definitely compels me to learn basic first aid and CPR, at least.
Replies (13)
Way too long. Not like they were in the boonies
4 likesThe scene was not safe so they had to stage. That's like the first thing you learn in EMT school (BSI, is my scene safe?)
18 likes- an actual EMT/Firefighter with a sweet stache
Yeah, actually the Tampa Bay area had one the fastest response times in the US, if not the fastest. I don't know if they still do or not. But I'm guessing it's because of all the old retirees that live there. At least, that's what i heard, I've never actually looked it up though
1 likeTrue however even if EMT arrived in 19 seconds probably wouldn't have pulled through with a shot that lethal.
1 likedang, what does that say about where I live that I thought 19 minutes sounded really quick... Ambulance took 40 mins to an hour to show up at my location when a friend collapsed and started having a seizure.
2 likes@Sparrow Cunningham lol nice
0 likesinteresting thought: the speed of arrival of the paramedics could determine the length of your sentence. early and he lives. late and he dies.
1 like19 minutes is a really long time to have to bleed out for until aid arrives
2 likesIn the case of gunshots ambulances may be delayed waiting for law enforcement to secure the scene.
2 likesIt’s Florida
0 likesI think I might wait a few minutes before responding to a shooting. let things calm down a bit.
0 likesThe best you can do is clear the airways, keep pressure on the wound, maintain chest compressions, and DON'T MOVE THE PATIENT! Any or all of those when applicable is the most an untrained person without supplies and skills with those supplies can really do. But that could be enough.
0 likes"Classic" CPR with the whole breathe in then push 10 times then breathe again is outdated and not really utilized anymore. Continuous chest compressions.
Edit: AND LEAVE THE PUNCTURE OBJECT (knife, spike, arrow, rebar, etc) IN!
@Rain eh, perhaps, but a lot of the sentence is determined by intent. A person could be made innocent even though the other person died.
0 likes”Force multiplier is a sidearm”… (i even had to think for a second what a sidearm meant) dude just say gun
1 likedefinition of spineless. if you instigate a conflict, be prepared to be retaliated against. it isn’t the other party’s fault if they match your energy. micheal did something, and the husband did something back, at which point they are effectively “even”. there was no reason for the conflict to then be elevated, this man was simply waiting for the opportunity to take “justice”into his own hands.
2 likesReplies (3)
Hmm, not really. There was no evenness at any point. You don't try to pick a fight over something that doesn't affect you, you don't push someone to the ground over an arguement, you don't shoot at someone that just pushed you to the ground. Unnecessary escalation in every step.
1 like@Zarco no i agree, i’m just saying in this situation, even at its most basic level without context, it still makes no sense for him to shoot. but yes everything was wrong from the beginning
0 likes@jeneral22 Yeah absolutely
0 likesI read online that this guy is not new to this kind of aggressive behaviour. This man is his first murder victim, but apparently the guy has a short fuse.
1 likeLost track of how many times that broken arm heals itself during interrogation, haha
0 likes“Did you serve?”
6253 likes“Affirmative sir, 5 years in the Boy Scouts”
Replies (36)
💀💀💀
70 likesGirl*
78 likesOh that had me laughing! 😂
36 likes🤣🤣
5 likes@nana me Including 6 tours serving under Major DeWitte - We can't talk about what we did or where we did it.
93 likesHe has the personality of Dwight Schrute from the Office, but only if Dwight was racist and evil
124 likes5 years... no merit badges!!
13 likes🤣😂🤓
1 likeThat reminds me of the 21 yo dude on TCAP!
3 likesLMAO
1 likeOof.
1 likeAffirmative!...Yes Sir!...Neutralize...these are the kind of people they have out there with guns in public for their own "protection"...what bullshit
16 likesWhat's the time stamp when he said that😂
3 likesI did my basic training on my couch ,, black ops
6 likesDid he say that?
2 likes@Junior Banyn No, I watched the whole thing again, he didn't say it. I thought the same thing
4 likesExactly! He was giving me Paul Blart Tees...🙄😏
1 likeBoy scouts at least means something whereas girl scouts is just cookies, sleepovers, and stupid girly crap. As a girl, I can confirm.
3 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesAffirmative..was a security guard for a hotel for a day
1 like..got to retire
8
0 likes@John Wood GET OUT OF MY FUNERAL!!!
1 likeNo joke, I had a coworker like that, he was a gun fanatic that although he had never been in the army was acting as if he were on "active duty" or something.
2 likesWhile walking with him to the station after work a guy tried to open my back pack, I confronted the would be thief about it while my coworker was cowering behind me. I am a 124 pounds 5'3 nothing of a woman. My coworker was 5'8 and around 300 or so pounds. I yelled at the would be thief and lucky for me the street had enough ppl that took notice and so he ran.
Afterwards my coworker was saying" The thief was smart to run away. I learned CQC in the army and would have beaten him up!"
Thankfully my coworker was just a veeerrryyy cringe guy. Still, I am happy that guns are regulated where I live and insecure idiots can't take out their insecurities on innocent ppl just because.
HAHAHAHA....
0 likesYES!!
0 likesDid you serve ...oh yes , custard in the school canteen ...
1 likeDon't make me laugh...gonna spit out my coffee! Lolz! : )
1 like😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
0 likesYo, roger that!
1 likeNo chill 🤣
0 likes@Junior Banyn it’s a joke dude.
0 likes@Ares Blanque I knew that 5 months ago... are you half reading
0 likesyou cant make this shit up
0 likes@Mo I haven’t watched the whole video yet so I haven’t heard him say anything racist but how is he racist? Is the very act of someone who’s white killing someone that’s black automatically make the motive one of race?
0 likesHe is a hero....i heard he sold over 600 boxes of peanut butter cookies
2 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesin my country we have this say "the soul is dear to God" so that the murderer ends by getting his punishement any way.
0 likesJust another violent racist who gets to rot in jail. RIP to the victim and God bless your family.
8 likesNever speak to the police without a lawyer present. Even if you didn't do it.
0 likesMy mother delivered the verdict in this case and sentencing
0 likesThe more I watch the more I realize how incredibly important is to have a lawyer present during these interrogations.
285 likesReplies (12)
so People like Mr. Drejka can get away pretending beeing innocent??! I tell you what i realize the more i think about what i've just watched for 50 Minutes and reading comments like yours: It's incredibly important not shoot at other people. Sadly there's one dead man and at least one family in tears and despair.
16 likes@SuperBalders Dude relax, I never said he was innocent. He is guilty but what you missed was that it's NEVER good talking to LEOs without representation.
30 likes@SuperBalders U can clearly tell That wasn’t the Intent of his message he was saying how the tactics they use to try and convict u are never In your favor wether ur innocent or guilty
33 likes@Dylan Druckman superbalders should image himself in a situation where some guys comes at him with a knife saying he will kill him but dies after being showed back and falling very unfortunately. See if then its good or bad to have a lawyer
0 likes@SuperBalders "it's incredibly important not shoot at other people" is oversimplifying it. Drejka's true motivation will only be known to himself. You have to give the benefit of the doubt when scrutinizing incidents shown in videos in slow motion or frame by frame. Confrontations happen fast and you'll be flooded with adrenaline. You really need to have a level head to make the right decisions in the heat of the moment. Even "trained" LEO themselves instinctively react wrongly and kill people. Having said this, I do think Drejka is a arrogant self righteous person based on the way he speaks, this incident and the 4 accounts of road rage.
4 likesD_Mat's point was that LEO will try to catch you from the first interaction and if they suspect you at all, you better get a lawyer. Notice, it had nothing to do with your guilt.
@SuperBalders But the point isn't whether or not the person sitting in the interrogation room is innocent or guilty, it matters that everyone has the right to legal representation, even arrogant assholes like this dude. More often, innocent people think they can just explain what happened and the police will let them go. Instead, they're often tricked into revealing information that can be used against them unfairly in court or into giving false confessions because they believe they're alone in there and if they do what the cops say, things will be easier. Every law video I've watched about the subject says don't talk to cops, get an attorney first no matter what. And that also doesn't mean that we excuse what he did or think he's a good person, ONLY that he has the same rights as everyone else
1 like@D_ Mat think i got your comment wrong in the first moment, sorry for that. i thought you've been only talking about this particular video and not several other JCS videos or related stuff.
1 like@Alkuf100 Not saying anything against the need for justice and the need for a fair legal representation at all. You're twisting the situation shown in this video, Mr. McGlockton died without having a knife or saying anything at all. No Lawyer in the world could have helped him as you know, because the guy he shoved away shot him dead. Where does this lead to? Society is in a bad state when everyone needs to expect violent escalation to the extreme before leaving the house. Does arming yourself make it better for others, or at least more safe for everyone?
1 like@SuperBalders Arming yourself, assuming you're not an idiot like Michael, absolutely makes it safer for everyone else. While I agree he was in the wrong, to play devil's advocate you could never know if the attacker had a knife stashed somewhere. Shit, for all the dude could have known the McGlockton could have been retreating to take cover and draw a gun of his own. The sheer amount of panic is enough to make anyone able to make stupid decisions. I don't agree with what happened, but given the circumstance I could see why someone in his position could possibly do such a thing.
1 likeThat being said, the way he conducted himself as well as previous traffic incidents clearly shows that Michael ultimately was the one in the wrong here.
@Jaze yeah, i think i got D-Mat's intention now :) .
0 likesTo the quote you're refering to: as the Prosecutor well explained, the problem is not drawing the gun when you feel in danger, but still firing it when you realized that your opponent freezes or turns away from you. And that's what Mr. Drejka did. Sure, Adrenaline is an important factor in such situations, though this situation is different. Drejka approached the car, realized at least then Mrs. Jacobs is waiting inside the car for someone, consequence is, that person will return sooner or later. I expect Drejka to have calculated all what might happen. So i don't think i am oversimplifying it, Drejka would still be free, McGockton would be alive - because this was no act of self defense like when he would be attacked out of nowhere. No. Drejka went into confrontations over and over again with the ill feeling of personal safety because he had a sidearm under his clothes.
@August McFarren okay, let's continue: Not only Person A (in this Situation Drejka) and B (McGlockton) who are the people in Center of the conflict are armed, but also C (why shouldn't the mother in the car be armed to protect her children aswell?) and of course Person D (The owner of the Shop has to protect his store!) and Person E (walking a Dog in daylight can get you into trouble!) and most the others around the shop all carry a gun. Remember it's around 3pm, there might be lots of customers.
0 likesThey are mostly strangers, only a few are somehow known to each other. F.e. Person D knows his regular customers, characterized Person A as calm guy who comes around quite often. Shit hits the fan if the first gun is drawn, would these people agree to calm down our would it end up in a even worse catastrophe? Yes, i am exaggerating of course...
But how do you know i'm not an "Idiot" like Drejka, the moment i grab my gun? How many people around you would make a mistake, or lose nerves? Back to the Picture: Imagine Person C who is worried about her children behind her and comes to conclusion that "neutralizing" Person A ist the best way to protect her kids or even her boyfriend, so she takes initiative. Would the suggested Person E, who arrived a moment later at the scene identify her in a defensive position or identify her as the aggressor? From my point of view, the more weapons (if gun, knife or whatever) in the situation, the harder to deescalate it is.
If weapons are in game, it's possibly someone makes use of them. the result in this case is obvious, we all know the story. and don't get me wrong, August, i can follow your arguments. Though, i would respond to your devils Advocate, the person you call attacker is defending his girlfriend from a stranger, if he had any kind of weapon other than his hands, he would have pointed it at Drejka and told him to leave the situation right now instead of attacking / injuring / killing a guy in front of his girl and her kid with a knife or a gun. Adding that Drejka just seemed to be unarmed himself before shit went wild.
Sorry, couldn't make it shorter. Greetings!
@SuperBalders I think EVERYONE should have an attorney before talking to the police and that NO ONE should carry weapons. Thats all
0 likesHe said he got “force multiplier” from the FBI and the detectives never heard that 💩 🤣 wanna be 12 so bad
2 likesThis snowballed out of control, because nobody (on either side) respects society's rules.
1 likeA normal average everyday person who REALLY wanted to use that weapon.
0 likesNEVER talk to the cops. Get a lawyer and shut your mouth. UnLeSs YoU hAvE nOtHiNg tO HiDE 🤪
1 likeAny legitimate firearms instructor that teaches carry classes always makes sure every student is aware that you should never put yourself in a situation that you need to use a firearm. They also teach that just making an aggressor aware that you possess a firearm is almost always effective enough to help you retreat to safety. I honestly believe this man wanted an excuse to take someone’s life and justify it.
319 likesReplies (8)
also the same country where you can shoot someone who assults you, jesus
7 likesYeah he shouldn’t have shot you will notice there 2 second delay when he pulled it out and the black guy backed away yet he still fired
10 likes@Stephanie coomey ?
5 likesBingo!
0 likes@macharin more like Stephanie Looney
6 likes@Stephanie coomey it's more dependent on context than that. You need to fear for your life and a serious assault is more than capable of doing that. It also depends on who provoked it and who initiated violence. If a van pulls up to a young woman and the doors open and a guy in a balaclava jumps out pulling her attempting to bring her into the van, but she manages to struggle and pull out a handg*n and shoot her assaulter, then hell yes it's a good thing she can shoot someone who assaults her.
0 likesI'm not certain he was "looking for an excuse to take a life" since it's possible he was using the gun to give him the security and confidence to confront people about anything that bothered him and feel powerful doing so. He may have fantasized about using that gun in what he saw as a justified way: like thinking he can confront someone, even be a real prick about it, but if someone escalates that to violence against him he'd happily pull out his g*n and use it if that person so much as takes another step towards him (or as this case plays out, takes 3 steps back and quarter turns away).
0 likesAs my dad would say "If you wouldn't go there without a gun, why would you go there with one?" Basically meaning exactly what you said. I hope that's something they teach.
0 likesI feel so sad for that family. The punishment is even sadder considering he feels no remorse, "wouldn't change a thing" and doesn't understand what he did was wrong. He didn't even blink when they told him he ended someone's life. He only ever shed a tear for his stupid fuckin dogs.
0 likesIf he had missed the round could have easily hit someone else in the store?
0 likesAt 36 min and 0 seconds: The Police finally say the guy he shot died, hahaha. He didn’t notice he was being led on all the way until the very end! Funny Police tricks!!
1 like“Anything, can and will be used against you.” Doesn’t say anything about helping you - why do they talk.
0 likesThis channel needs to be renamed "I should have called a lawyer"
5033 likesReplies (42)
More like- Shut the eff up!!
17 likesIts strange how people talk so freely to the police they work for the prosecution I mean its there job isn't it
53 likesBrian Woodruff “they’ll never suspect me, look they brought me water and everything! we’re friends!” idiots forget how the law works when they think they’re getting what they want
95 likes@loddydobbs yeah its like a script all cops follow I just finished watching the whole thing up to about 1.40 he's chatting like to mates in a bar
16 likesFuck yes it shoulda hahahah
5 likes@Ari C No, it actually is that easy. If you tell the police you don't want to answer any questions without a lawyer, the interview process stops.
46 likesIm learning just in case😂😂😂🙏
4 likes@Ari C I had no idea, I always understood that a public defender took a small nominal fee, and then their services are free. In the UK we have a legal aid system, if you cannot afford a lawyer, you can get one for free, granted, they are mostly useless and don't always have the best interest of their clients at heart.
4 likes@Ari C It seems so strange to me, that during the US presidential campaigns, the word "socialist" is thrown out as an insult, almost like you were calling someone a fascist. I am from Scotland, it is a socialist country, we have free primary, secondary and university education, free legal representation and i feel most importantly, free universal healthcare. It is terrible what your friend is going through, as an outsider it seems to me the values that the USA claim to be what makes America unique, never seem to be just. In the land of the free, nothing seems to be free.
28 likesThis channel has further inforced the need that I have to repeatedly tell my teenage to NEVER SPEAK TO THE COPS. Without me or his dad and an attorney. Ever. Even if he didn't do anything.
11 likesThis is what I never get with any of these videos. No lawyers. I don’t care what I’m being asked about I’m not calling a lawyer.
5 likes@loddydobbs while this is more of a comedic way to look at it i think it has to do with the suspects having that special snowflake feel about themselves, in their heads they're the main character in a story and everyone else is an npc so "there's no way that can happen to me" is in full active mode before well it isn't
3 likesLiterally
0 likesDon’t need a lawyer interrogators are your friends
5 likesYeah really, if you justifiably shoot in intruder in your home, don’t say anything without a lawyer.
6 likes@Brian Woodruff many people believe that they are innocent or that there is not enough evidence against them. That’s my guess
4 likesI been saying!!! Why don’t these suspects ever ask for a lawyer?!?!
3 likesBetter call Saul.
10 likes@Stuart Sibbald Scotland isn’t a socialist country. You have social welfare that doesn’t mean you’re socialist. Same in Ireland, “free” education, “free” healthcare, “free” legal aid (none of which is actually free by the way) and generous social welfare for those who refuse to work. You don’t know what socialism actually is.
5 likes@Stuart Sibbald social programs don’t equal socialism. We still have private ownership and the government doesn’t control the means of production. I can’t believe you think you live in a socialist country when the UK is thoroughly capitalist.
4 likesBut then there would be no interrogation vids for us to watch!
4 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likesThis guy should've consulted Jeff.
5 likesHe didn't even get a Coke outta the deal
Hahaha seriously. DON'T TALK TO THE POLICE. They have one job. And it isn't to protect and serve.
4 likesBetter call saul!
1 like@Andres Rodriguez 😂👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
0 likes@Tunechi Lee in U.S yes but Canada no
1 like@chefgav1 I suppose that sort thing is what you get when you are subservient to a crown.
0 likes@Andres Rodriguez 😂😂😂
0 likes@Andres Rodriguez Jeff never did get a butterfinger. 😢
1 like@Stuart Sibbald it’s not free if your taxes are more than half your income...
2 likes@Richard Granger As I am from the UK, and don't have any knowledge, what percentage of US tax payers would that relate to?
0 likesIkr I come from a family of lawyers prosecuters and judges. Every single one of them says the only sentence you should say is "I need a lawyer."
4 likes@Gachabrain I have no idea how many people get arrested daily my expertise is in electrical installation. How many people are arrested daily ?
1 like@Stuart Sibbald You don't live in a socialist country. At most, it is a Social Democracy. but it IS Socialist in the colloquial way that Americans use it, when the government collect taxes and pays for stuff beyond roads, military, and police.
1 likeSocial democracy is great. Socialism can be great to, but it means when the workers own the means of production. It gets rid of Owners being kings of their little fiefdoms, and brings democracy to the work place. decisions are made by popular demand. The wealth generated by that business gets divided up a little more fairly.
I don't know how it is determined who gets more or less money in that system. And I think that system is only really good to use with medium or large companies, so that workers get paid very well, and the CEOs don't get paid tens of millions for providing no where NEAR that level of value, despite what dim witted conservatives will tell you.
@Dennzer1 This.
1 likeFor sure agreed
1 likeOnly defendant who did was Casey Anthony and it saved her skin.
2 likesWhite man wishing he was a cop while saying he owns a store he does not own scared a innocent woman and kids over a parking space... Then kills her husband trying to protect them...
1 likeRacist in the comments: shoulda had a lawyer.
@Stuart Sibbald As an American living abroad, that IS the problem with America. Many Americans throw words like socialist out there, with no understanding as to what it means.
0 likesno literallt
0 likes@bntntnt g. g t t English please?
0 likesThey both used inappropriate force during the altercation. Marquis didn't "need" to shove on the ground a guy arguing with his girlfriend without even a warning. And Michael didn't "need" to shoot at a guy who is retreating in front of him.
0 likesBut one of the act ended up with a sore arm and a bruise. The other with a dead guy in a middle of a store, in front of his son.
I honestly don't think it was a racial crime, but I think it was a cowardly guy, feeling empowered because he was carrying a gun, and was trying to feel more important than he was.
As an European, the "disabled parking spot" is way more important than for an America. Here, we have a lot less parking spaces, so the disabled ones are really important, and people parking on them are really badly seen. but in America ? There's ton of parking spaces. Even on the video, there's 3 empty spots just in front of the store where a disabled person could have parked when Michael started his crusade.
So yeah, Michael probably didn't want to kill anybody, but he certainly wasn't in any danger as soon as he pulled the gun. As the prosecutor said, as soon as he pulled the gun, it was over, and the shot only happened after that.
insane that he wasn’t a cop.. trigger-happy r4cist? he’s perfect 😐
2 likes“It’s so quiet these damn cars. Doesn’t sound anything like mine.” Why am I not surprised?
0 likesI still really struggle with this one. The father was the first one to get physical, making him the assailant. Of course the shooter's a loon, but idk about this verdict.
1 likeReplies (6)
The guy who pushed him backed away as he saw the gun... Very unjustified shooting.
2 likes@zelenyy You can't just run up and physically assault someone tho. In what world is that the solution? For a grown man in front of his children? He attacked him first and took it there. Such a poor decision on his part which triggered the shooter's poor decision. Smh. Play stupid games...
2 likes@peps It was stupid of him to push him - but to get killed for it? Drejka was justified in pulling out the gun, but only to use as a threat - not a weapon.
2 likes@zelenyy I agree, but unfortunately that's not what happened and both failed to consider the consequences of their actions.
0 likesThe shooter was harassing the mother of his children with the children in the car still with her and the shooter could have minded his own business or tell a store clerk.
0 likesHave some perspective
@Porky verbal harassment doesn't mean you can escalate things to physical violence. The father wasn't even involved. He could have minded his own business. Just like you said, their kids were there. What a disgusting example to set for them. Be the bigger person. Use your words to problem solve like a big boy instead of pushing on the playground. That's the adult perspective!
0 likesI don't think I have ever seen a better advertisement for getting a lawyer
8741 likesReplies (115)
Or moving out of Florida!
395 likesLol
8 likesMax Schneiter or not shooting in moderate violence but yes lawyer for sure
316 likesBut not the guy that actually defended him. When he said that the parking lot commando was the "Real Victim" that got NO favor with the jury. That one lady was like WTF?!?!
220 likes@Anonymous Bosch Or not resulting to violence in the first place.
48 likesThe rest of Jim’s videos 😂
3 likesMax Schneiter if you point your weapon, which I have, at the threat and the threat is then over and you still shoot, murder
187 likesAbsolutely, be it right or wrong, this guy more than likely would have walked if he had shut up and used his rights for a lawyer.
53 likes@scumshine There are endless videos of black women ramping up and agitating their overly emotional "men" into furious/violent action. I imagine that it's what we saw here...
35 likes@Max Schneiter Depending on where you're from, you may have a different standard of dangerously violent. Seeing a guy knocked to the ground may be shocking to some people, other people might see that he didn't hit him when he was down. The victim was threatening but not life-threatening. I think the killer was motivated by his desire for revenge, not fear.
67 likesLawyers defend the innocent and the innocent are smart enough to get lawers. This guy shot a retreating man so he clearly is not intelligent. Wouldve been self defense if the guy wouldve kept at him but still why didnt he just get back and hit him back? It was a shooting of anger any normal person wouldve either fist fought or stopped after pointing the gun.
26 likesThe most damning thing was that he had done this 4 times before, no amount of lawyers can save you after that.
35 likes@SatanIceCream Words are words, the "victim" initiated the ACTUAL battery: fight words with words, fight fire with fire...
26 likes@Ellipsis of Triple Tap if he hadn't approached the vehicle, called the cops or reported them to authorities (like he should have if he actually thought they were doing something wrong), and minded his business, this wouldn't have happened. this has nothing to do with your pre-existing biases.
26 likesEllipsis of Triple Tap “fight fire with fire” are you actually trying to compare being shoved to being shot? and you talk about logic
32 likes@scumshine People have literally died from being shoved to concrete as well as have been stomped and kicked causing great bodily harm so, yeah, that shove could definitely be grounds for deadly force...
29 likes@Alienated TV striking or pushing someone from a blind angle is both cowardly and dangerous. Plenty of people have died or become seriously injured by hitting their heads on asphalt or concrete.
25 likes@Ellipsis of Triple Tap You're very clearly racist and I hope you change. I don't have an opinion on this case but you're scaring me. Don't hurt people please and try to be less racist. Ik you probably won't listen to a random person on the internet, but your life will be a lot better through loving others.
36 likesRight! The whole time I was like this guy needs to STOP TALKING LIKE NOW! Geez.....he was wrong on so many levels. He picked a fight and got made when he got pushed down in the schoolyard. What was up with that sling that he made? Ridiculous, Im glad he got time.
6 likesThis guy carried a weapon with the wrong mindset. He was quick to be in an altercation which caused a man to come to his wife’s defense. He caused the event and responded in error with deadly force. He should have minded his own business. Right or wrong, he should have lawyered up.
15 likes@Max Schneiter People have pointed out that he didn't step towards the shooter. But he didn't run either. Not sure how I feel about the shooter (even with time to think about it), but if I'm unarmed and I pushed a guy and he pulled a gun I'm sure I know what I'd do. Run to the other dudes car for cover. If he shot him in the back 2.5 seconds after showing his weapon the hang him. But 2.5 seconds is a long time to not run away.
13 likes@C. Elizabeth That lady was not a juror, she was in the audience. They do not show the jurors on TV until after the case.
1 like@Jokul Snow the thing is, his wife and kids were still there, so running is not an easy choice. I know I would have been torn between running and protecting my family. I've been in a situation where I had to stand between my wife and a very angry(for no reason) cop, the instinct to protect is a strong thing.
20 likesSadly yes, everyone thinks they can talk their way out of a security camera. The only thing that could possibly happen from the whole interrogation is him screwing himself over.
5 likes@Andrew Cargil You know what they say about hope. It breeds eternal misery
4 likesslowed down if he hadn't physically assaulted an innocent man in front of children hed be alive
3 likesjmh4ggg No you don't do the same. You verbally attempt to resolve the situation. We're talking about superior human beings here.
1 likeSo you can get away with murder? Take accountability for your actions instead!
6 likesEllipsis of Triple Tap
7 likesSo basically, being pushed down is equivalent to being shot and killed? He easily could’ve gone for the legs and/or REASSESSED to confirm whether the “attacker” would continue to escalate the situation prior to ending his life. “Logic”, nowadays...
Frank or just Casey Anthony’s jury 🤬
0 likesFrank woah hey, very few people are defending this guy in the comments. We’d still convict him, tyvm
1 likeMax Schneiter Or not ending the life of a man in front of his family over a parking dispute? I think that’s clearly the more poignant lesson.
5 likesBrooke Lovett but that is the golden rule. Any decent human being knows that. I think the murder goes way past the point you are identifying. The lawyer part always comes much later, after the crime has been committed. JMO, of course.
0 likesC. Elizabeth it was like the lawyer was working against him.
1 likeJokul Snow not true, if you run in you in the open like that you risk getting shot on the back , plus he was judging to see if he would shot his wife are the kids in the car, he was still trying to protect. Did you know a mother put her body over her 6 month child when cops was shooting in the car and save her baby life. She did no crime she was a bysider. Yes, some people will only think of themself but there are people out there that think about others. A person did me like that when a gun was pull out, not everybody will run if they think you are the crazy one and trying to save a life. He was defending her and it show to the very end that was on his mind.
1 like@Andrew Cargil I hope you're being sarcastic with your "are you saying men and women aren't equal?" comment.
2 likes@Max Schneiter "Dangerously violent"? He was coming to the defense of his wife because another man was in close proximity and agitating her. 'Course he shouldn't have put his hands on another person legally not that anyone could've blamed him for it. Everyone was in the wrong. And it began with Drejka roleplaying a cop to mask his massive insecurities and physical weakness.
7 likes@Sentinel Liberty Protecting her from what exactly? Some guy telling her to move her car? Maybe he was less than polite, but that isn't an excuse to blindside someone.
12 likesno name well he don’t own that parking spot so he should of minded his damn business.Dont let some white man tell you what you can and cannot do.Stand for something
2 likesthe tire tracks + boots one is a better one
0 likes@Frank His defense was fucked as soon as he started blabbing to the cops, something a good lawyer would have never let him do.
3 likesJefffffff
0 likes@scumshine Instigated what? He was just talking.
2 likesAll these videos on this channel have convinced me
0 likes@AndroidDoctorr ....no no respect your handcapped...dont put
1 likecolor politics... drejka definitely hit hard enough to be not thinking
total clear..and the guy still there ..the girlfriend""?? who could
have fixed was as i said before..getting out to do some more smartmouth it appears... and 50-50 for sure self defense in fear
of life.. ''remember dont doctor here''hah...''fear'' of'' life'' ...
and if the black guy who hit him nfl hard could have killed anyway...
u missing...and just bc he was bitching correctly...he had not done
anything besides that and was ''away''from her car..enough...further
than i have seen a lot of ppl do...so that was fair enough... so if
the hard hit had killed the guy drejka... drejka deserves doubt...
cant tell if he was '''out in head'' or not...now u believe me...
im older white [called white] and i been in shock fear from getting
hit...and i more believe the ''big bullies'' of any kind deserve it when
the do that on purpose... u should too... had to answer a few of these
for that reason.. 30yrs of mouth and lip...in many places...needs to
come under control...and physical hard hitting...bc u think u gonna
get away with it...needs to stop... i wish a better way...
and wish it was a wounded shot...but... if anything ...whites
talking here need to ''wake'' .... if anything...that was definitely a
''racial hate crime'' by marquis...and...girlfriend...she cranked it up...
if we do call police as should and report...plz dont call the police bullies?? quit being such a trained oneway... i have seen black and
others not hire lawyer...get a public defender like in good old nyc or
chicago...and get away with something like that 2-3- times in my
life when it was black shoot white...and one shoot a teen...and call
it ''threats and racial hate name calling'' and get away with it...dismissed...
totally no real proof always...
and drejka maybe ddnt mean to shoot where he did...would have to
determine that also... any case,, lighter sentence due to circumstance...
I'm loving everyone's opinions on this case. Yes he deserved jail. The guy was protecting his lady, true that.
2 likesHahahahhah right
0 likesOnly had over an hour to come up with that plan! 🙄🙄🙄
0 likes@videocadet 6 months late, but you do NOT shoot for the limbs. Your chances of missing (which are already high for people who don't train all the time) increase significantly and people can still die very rapidly from limb shots if it hits the right place. If you pull the trigger, it is ONLY because your, or someone else's, life is in imminent danger, period. As the prosecutor said, he was fully justified in pulling his gun, but he definitely should not have pulled the trigger as he was no longer in danger of life or serious injury as the guy was definitely no longer advancing.
5 likes@Jokul Snow What about shock?!?! 2.5 secs to react?!?!
0 likes@scumshine He stood their in shock?!?!
0 likesI’m glad he did not get one. Weird how a lawyer, could have helped not get justice done that day...
0 likesAly-Bocar Cisse Justice is also having a right to defend yourself in a court of law, but we see what you did there.
2 likes@Anonymous Bosch Yep if he pulled his weapon and instantly fired it would have been self defense. The attacker wouldn't have had time to back off.
1 likeIt didn't matter though. He was a political example. He was fucked no matter what. The video is proof of his innocence yet everyone in this here comment section thinks otherwise because why did he shoot the guy violently assaulting him... he backed up... yea nothing stopping that guy from charging him and killing him if he put the gun down. Sorry they could have avoided the entire thing by not assaulting him and or not arguing in the first place.
1 like@DeludoSuiHe would be innocent if he fired immediately. Instead he wait for the guy to no only back away but actually turning his body to leave. At this point you can't argue, "I feared for my life" anymore. Not to mention he started the entire altercation because in his mind he thinks that's his store.
2 likesI know you guys hate to see the law not be on the side of your opinion. HAHAH
1 likeNo Fux I’m not into simple answers for a whole category as much as taking each shooting on a case by case basis and asking the most important question which is “Did the person have to shoot” and we use the standard of would a competent peer make the same judgment and in this case I don’t think they would
0 likesThis whole channel!
1 like@DeludoSui thats not how self defense works. Much in the same way if someone pushed you and you punched them til they died you would be be charged, because somewhere in there they weren't a threat anymore and you used excessive force. Same applies here he pushed him which was assault, and like they said he had every right to pull his pistol out no ones arguing that. Now had the man kept charging him that would be self defense, but because he stopped and was in the process of retreating he was no longer a threat which makes shooting him unjustified and not self defense. So the video does not show self defense and therefore shows an unjustified shooting. And against your argument of him being doomed because it was political this whole video is the interrogation right after this incident happened, he was doomed that day. And like many others have said he's had a history of getting to altercations, even drawing his firearm on a woman with her kids in the car. He was pushed and wanted a chance to use his firearm plain and simple
3 likesCorrrect indeed! As a matter of fact- EVERY video on this channel is a prime example of
1 likeNEVER TALK TO LAW ENFORCEMENT WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY PRESENT!!!!
I don’t care if police are interviewing you about your cat getting hit by a car.. HAVE A LAWYER PRESENT or end the interview. PERIOD THE END! People can be so clueless. Smdh.
@Jacob P Your reaction is to blindside him without saying a word? Wouldnt it be better (and safer) to confront him man to man?
2 likes@Max Schneiter wouldn't it be better and safer to report such a "crime" to the appropriate person. It goes both ways, instead of arguing with a female who obviously isn't going to listen. There are always better and safer options. You could always lock yourself in a closet and have the most scientifically safe water and food fed to you (can go on and on).
2 likes@Max Schneiter If someone parking in a handicap parking spot is worth arguing with, you should just call the appropriate people to deal with it.
1 like@Jacob P I dont think it is ever a good idea to argue with any stranger about anything, but assault is never a legal response to an argument
0 likes@Jacob P Here is the difference: it is perfectly legal and not unreasonable to verbally confront someone if you disagree with what they are doing. On the otherhand, It is perfectly illegal and unreasonable to assault someone because they confronted someone you know. Freedom of speech does not allow you to assault someone, it does allow you to tell them you dont like what they are doing though.
6 likesIt's great that this guy didn't get a lawyer. The world is better off without him on the streets.
0 likesi would have him out of jail and the case dropped in a week if he was my client. period
1 likeSo you think he should get lawyer protection? Huh? A man who played cop and killed a person?
0 likes@Pareen Pattni Of course, every American is entitled to legal representation. It's literally stated in the Miranda Rights that are read to people who are placed under arrest. There is also this little thing we call "Innocent until Proven Guilty".
3 likes@Max Schneiter I agree not only America but the whole world. But most of the times guilty people are made to win the case by the defenders attorneys manipulative talks which is unjust
0 likes@Pareen Pattni of course...you don't? So if Pareen Pattni thinks he is guilty he shouldn't get legal representation? The beauty of our legal system is that everyone, guilty or not, is entitled to a lawyer. I know you know everything and you would never ever convict an innocent man but we are all not so perfect. Let me guess, Trump also had the election stolen from him, right?
0 likes@N Anderson I am not a trump supporter, mate. Please don’t make such assumptions and no I do not know everything. I only expressed my thought because sometimes people who have committed the crimes get away by proving not guilty with the lawyers and it’s unjust. Nothing else 🙂
1 like@Pareen Pattni "better that a 100 guilty men go free than one innocent man be punished".....again, it's the beauty of our legal system. Who decides they, "committed the crime and got away"? you? If you don't understand that concept you should probably avoid commenting. It's legal theory 101.
2 likes@N Anderson Did I once mention I will decide? Don’t say things I didn’t mean and make stupid assumptions. I was expressing my thought like a thousand other people here and you have no right to tell me not to comment. I don’t want to comment anything on America’s “ beauty of the legal system”. If you don’t agree with me, it’s fine. It appears that you tend to know everything and all the concepts and can’t stand anyone else to say anything against your thought process , good for you.
1 like@Pareen Pattni lol. wow. you said in your first comment (making the smart point, he shouldn't get a lawyer because he is guilty - isn't that you deciding smart guy?) because guilty people w/ lawyers have been found not guilty sometimes. my question was/is, HOW DO YOU KNOW THEY WERE GUILTY? because of the news? if they are found not guilty, they are...NOT GUILTY. but this is my fault...argue with a fool, look like a fool.
0 likesLol no sh!+
0 likesCorrect Marquis should have never resorted to violence over Words you don’t want to hear
1 likeFinally they must be a erasing all the comments were people use common sense. This is the first one I have seen and I have read a lot. Seems like you have to tiptoe around with your speech anymore or people want to use violence against you quick
1 like@AugustusCaesar I agree, but if the accusation of over-escalation of violence is EVER thrown around here, then both parties are supremely guilty. The difference is:
0 likes1 Pushed a person to the ground
1 Shot a person
There is no comparison.
@Max Schneiter
0 likes“Only a dangerously violent person would react the way he did to an argument”
I’m sure the people tore you a new one for this upsurdly hilarious claim. But to just make it easy
1. You require a reality check.
2. More importantly: if you saw ur wife and kids (or S/O and kids, family, etc) and there was a dude getting in their face, yelling and more, you’re not gonna do shit about it? LMAO please
@Kingof Grim It is not a "normal reaction" to blindside someone without saying a word just because he is arguing with your wife. If he had survived he would have been charged with assault. If you honestly think that it is acceptable to assault someone for arguing with someone you know than you need to get some anger management treatment.
2 likes@C. Elizabeth The jury system you have in the US is so bad. You basically need to play an fucking act as a lawyer to "please" the jury LMAO xDDD
0 likes@Alex Xela you're all across these types of videos laying blame when it appears you can't grasp context.
0 likesNEVER EVER NEVER TALK WITHOUT A LAWYER. The narrator of this video is bias - it shouldn’t be an opinion video
1 likeSo true!!
1 likeWhat the Chris Watts episode.
0 likes@SatanIceCream How did he assault her?
0 likesHe shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
2 likes@Max Schneiter You said it perfectly. The shooter responded to a physical aggression. And the aggressor responded to a simple verbal argument. It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself but at least he got rid of that animal. (whoever resorts to violence in an argument is an animal).
2 likes@Michael Zomsuv Yes. I agree that this was justified self defense, but the shooter was also very stupid and largely responsible for his own predicament. He strikes me as very naive and childish, playing cop like a little kid. Worst of all, because of his ego I think he was afraid to admit to the police that he was scared after the push. You cannot claim self defense with a lethal weapon unless you feel that your life was in danger. His inability to admit that did him in.
0 likes@Max Schneiter Except his life was threatened. He was pushed from the back on a concrete floor. People DIE ALL THE TIME from falling wrong. He would have died or end up in a wheel chair had he fell on the head.
1 likeNot going anywhere for a while?
0 likesGrab a Snickers.
@Michael Zomsuv I’d like to see the statistics of dying from falling weird. Do you think it causes more frequent deaths than bullets to the chest?
1 like@Michael Zomsuv Why cuss at me dude? Are you ok?
0 likesMy larger point was a mental exercise; ask yourself these questions: How many people fall per day? How many people are shot per day? Which action results in a larger number of deaths per event?
@Christian Van Matre Why are you asking the same questions again?
0 likesI answered everything in my last comment. To repeat myself, deaths by falling is #4 cause of death in the USA. Death by gun shot is #14. There's 100 times more deaths by falling than death by gun shots in the US.
@Michael Zomsuv No, that’s not my question.
0 likesDo you think that the same number of people are shot that fall down? Which is the more lethal mechanism?
@Anonymous Bosch if you draw your weapon and do not fire, in many US states, you're still off to jail. In many cases it is better to fire it than not
0 likes@Ark worthy it’s totally legal to stop a threat with the presence of a gun if the conditions are legally justified. Brandishing a weapon when not justified is still very illegal
0 likes@Anonymous Bosch Sure, but there are lots of cases where the brandishing of a gun is legitimised by the use of the weapon, and vice versa the presence of the gun is de-legitimised by not having being used. There are therefore plenty of cases where you would be better of just killing someone. Or so it would seem.
0 likes@Ark worthy I don’t think it’s a good idea to kill anyone unless absolutely necessary for the survival or defense from grievous bodily harm for yourself or others. The idea that I’m legally better off taking a life if I’ve needed to draw my weapon makes me concerned about your training and mindset more than I’m concerned about the legal trends in our country. I’m going to assume you’re simply using a bit of hyperbole to make a point about the sometimes absurd rulings of our courts than being literal about killing people
1 like@Anonymous Bosch That's exactly what I am doing. We're likely in agreement that killing anyone (outside of wildly unfortunate aggravated circumstances) is not a decent thing to do. That said, it's why I am remarking on how strange it is that in some cases, one is more likely to receive a tougher sentence if they DON'T pull that trigger. I understand the logic behind it, but I wish there were a better precedent for it.
1 like@Ark worthy in that we agree, I negotiate things for a living and I sometimes forget all the ways we make points in loose talk when we’re casually writing
0 likes@Ellipsis of Triple Tap wrong
0 likesThis whole channel is a big ruse to get you to get yourself a lawyer then LCS will dm you and tell you he actually is one and he can help... Probably.
1 likeAnd then what? Those kids grow up hearing the man who killed their father went free?
0 likes@Neeltje Kijkt Joeptjoep in the US everyone has a right to an attorney and a fair trial.
0 likesParked in the handicap. Then assaults someone...he definitely getting shot! Then lawyer up! You know how many people get stomped out in a coma or dead...
2 likesBetter call Saul. Though it is fictional
0 likes@Max Schneiter The guy shouldn't have pushed him but he was backing up when he got shot there is absolutely no justification for that
0 likes@Max Schneiter Getting pushed isn't an excuse to shoot someone especially when they're backing away from you
0 likes@Nicholas Payne I'm not sure about that, imo the video doesn't decisively show that the victim was retreating. On the other hand, the victim had already acted violently seconds earlier so it stands to reason that he was likely to attack again.
1 likeor reasons not to live in the States
0 likes@Anonymous Bosch Agree that it is manslaughter and the conviction was the correct outcome. BUT... it is also correct to say that the guy was a serious threat. After he shoved the shooter, he DID start to move towards him... and we can only speculate what would have happened had the shooter not brandished a gun. I dont think it is unreasonable to assume he would have put a serious beating on him. As Max said, only a dangerous person would react that way to a verbal argument.
1 likeWell better call Saul
0 likesIf Dreyka hit his head when he was viciously pushed and died or if his assailant finished what he started no one would make the race question.
0 likes“It’s our god given right as Americans to have guns” 🤣🤣
0 likesMan, the comment section is terrible. People just looking to excuse murder
13 likesReplies (5)
All the top comments are mocking the shooter
0 likes@keian roth when I looked I was sorting by recent
0 likesFrom my view, most of the comments seem to be alluding to the idea that the perpetrator is a military wannabe/loser
4 likes@Arif yee, must have just gotten a bunch of stupid comments around the time I watched it a few weeks ago. Glad to see it's not usually like that
1 like@Chillin' Squirtle Fair enough. If the comments section was as you described, that is pretty messed up.
2 likesThis is a perfect example of who should not be granted a license to carry a firearm. Nobody is trying to take guns away from people. The vetting process needs to slow down and be done deliberately, with full on psychiatric evaluation being a part of it. In stages. Not unlike the process to obtain a pilot's license. Can't let sketchy people operate an airborne vehicle willy nilly, and can't let a sketchy person just be able to carry around a gun at the fkng Dollar store, enforcing parking laws. This is ridiculous. All you completely responsible folks who move around with firearms and know the severity of it, get on board keeping them out of the wrong hands please.
0 likesIf anyone is wondering, Michael Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison.
2631 likesReplies (180)
@DSW22 I disagree that him being a Karen made him deserve to be knocked down. That was literal assault and totally overboard. However, he shouldn't have retaliated the way that he did.
193 likeshell yes
1 like@Palahume idk. I don’t think he necessarily meant to knock him down so much as just push him for harassing his wife. He was standing up for his family.
179 likes@Palahume protecting his family because this guy was yelling at his wife.
103 likes@Danielle Walker This is true, however I think both Marquiese and Michael handled this situation wrong, although Michael handled it by far the most wrong.
94 likesMarquiese responded to a verbal altercation with physical violence, which generally speaking is not the correct response and is not a proportional reaction. However Micheal responded to non-lethal physical violence with deadly force.
The most that should have happened here was he could have pulled his gun out without firing. Marquiese had already backed up probably 5+ feet from Michael by the time he fired, so the shooting was 100% unjustified, a verbal warning would have been enough to defuse the situation and prevent any further physical violence.
People like Michael are too irresponsible to carry a gun if they don't understand reasonable escalation of force. Generally speaking you should always respond in proportion to the amount of force being exerted on you in these situations.
@Danielle Walker My point is he didn't even have enough time to figure out if the guy was "harassing" and "yelling"... And even if the guy was, that's not justification to push someone down, assaulting him physically. 🤦
29 likes@Palahume Everyone around knew there was yelling, including in the store (1:20). It appears that the yelling is why he went out (without any purchases, and leaving his 5 year old son in the store) to see what was happening, realised it was around his families car, then went to defend his family from someone behaving aggressively toward them.
41 likes@Archer Still not convinced that assaulting someone was the appropriate method of handling the situation. By doing that, he set him self up for an unfavorable reaction. 🤨🤔🤦
24 likes@Palahume Assaulting someone isn't appropriate, but you have to ask why the muppet doing 20 years verbally assaulted the deceased guys family, ergo setting himself up for the unfavourable reaction of being pushed over.
36 likes@Palahume No one deserves to die because they pushed someone down once
45 likesShould have locked him up and thrown away the key. However at least he did get time.
8 likes@Archer I wouldn't say his asking the woman where her disability tags are "assaulting".... It's being a Karen, no doubt, but not assaulting. 🤦
6 likes@V L I agree. I don't see anyone saying otherwise. Hence, why I've said multiple times that the guy took it too far.
6 likes@Palahume He wasn't "just asking". As pointed out in the video: he was making a racket (so much so it could be heard in the shop itself). Assaults can be verbal you know.
26 likesHe got as much time as the girl who tried to have her husband killed. If that doesn't seem wrong I don't know what does. He might have overreacted but when you are trained to use a concealed firearm you're told that by the time you pull your gun is when you should be fire your gun and never pull it before then. He was attacked from behind and thrown on the ground and was not ready to be physically attacked.
9 likes@WandererTheLost oh no I’m gonna get punched and kicked! Lemme take a mans life and leave a young family fatherless…
23 likes@Some Guy Oh some guy is saying words at my wife. Better push him to the ground without saying a word to him. Don't start fights with random people. Some are crazy and some are paranoid. Why risk your life starting a fight with a random dude at a gas station? His bad decision lead to a widow and fatherless children. He may not have deserved it but starting fights is a good way to eventually lose one. And when you lose one to someone smaller than you, it is probably through excessive force.
10 likes@Danielle Walker words should never lead to physicality or the next step will take place. It's common sense. Both were to blame, But being pushed to the ground makes you fearful for your life because you don't know what's going to happen next. Should have threw both your hands up directly into the air. That is the obvious surrender stance. Since he wasn't in a full-blown surrender stance I'm not 100% convinced he was going to leave him alone, more like thinking of a way to get that gun.
3 likes@Some Guy I blame the left for perpetuating fear of blacks through the protests as of late.
6 likes@WandererTheLost i don't understand why you say the victim started the fight. Even the cops agree, this guy started the fight. He started it by starting the whole encounter. Why is it, people forget the aggressor in self defense cases? If you start the interaction, you started the fight. This guy wouldn't be in jail, if he had just gone into the store in the first place
21 likesTell the store if you care that much. He wanted to be an ass, he started it all.
@Ghost of Sparta I didn't say him dying was the right penalty. I will point out that when he was drawing the gun out, the person had just hit him from behind, put him in a compromised position he could not easily retreat from, and was moving towards him again. This all happened as an escalation of talking even if that talking was heated that is not the appropriate response. I would also like to say that if he wanted to kill him, firing one shot and then stopping is not how someone looking to kill normally would go about it. If you have the right to shoot one bullet most people will not give you trouble for shooting many. I don't think he intended to kill him. If you run around getting physically violent to people you can take in a fight, then eventually you will find someone who knows they can't win that fight and has a gun. It was a bad situation all around but the person to escalate it was the father. He was the one who had the most to lose and his family paid that price. Jail does not make up for it and it was at least a decent amount his fault.
5 likes@Robin Galbraith If I tell you that you are breaking the law on the street does that give you the right to hit me in the back? IF you are bigger then I am and have just sucker punched me from behind should I not be afraid? I don't care if he was yelling at the top of his lungs (which he wasn't) physical violence was not the right response. He was hit to the ground from behind by a guy that looked like he could have kicked his ass badly. If he let that guy who already demonstrated that he was going to use physical violence first get next to him all it would have taken was a few good hits and he could have easily been knocked unconscious or killed. The guy was moving towards him on the ground where he could not easily have retreated from so pulling the gun at that point was understandable. After doing so and holding it there for the amount of time he did the guy was backing off and at that point shooing was the wrong action. That said, that guy had every intention and moving toward someone he had just thrown helplessly to the ground who he probably could have taken even in a fair fight. He didn't deserve to die from the only one bullet the guy shot but just remember that he started it and if the guy wanted to kill him, he could have easily shot him multiple times. If he was not going to get in trouble for shooting, then shooting multiple times would have been just as defensible. He didn't intend to kill that guy. He even sat there waiting for the police. Basically don't physically attack people and then assume that there isn't a chance they will be ready to go to far just like the father went to far. Mistakes on both sides but as a father you have much more to lose and his family paid the price.
6 likes@WandererTheLost 47:25
1 like@WandererTheLost It is not your duty to enforce the law but it is a father's duty to protect his family. Regardless of assault, there is no justification to heart shot a retreating unarmed man.
9 likes@David If you watch the video he had already attacked him and was moving in up until the point where the gun was pulled. It was safe to assume he was going to continue his assault. That father sure did a good job protecting his family from words. Those hurt feeling he saved them from will comfort them in their nights without him.
3 likes@Tyler Hite, “perpetrating fear of ‘blacks?’” Lmao.
4 likesI feel bad for the guy 💁🏻 he should’ve got like 5 years max
1 like@Manuel Arango You can not honestly tell me that after he pushes the guy to the ground, you don't see the guy moving towards the now prone person. He is pulling up his pants and moving towards him after already pushing him down. If he didn't pull a gun that guy would have beaten that man for who knows how long. People who sucker punch people without a word are not the kinds of people who then have a rational conversation. Your only argument was they skinny guy was "attacking" his wife with scary words. That required physical violence on someone who didn't even know he was there.
5 likes@WandererTheLost Yes, he moves to him after the push to see what the fuck was happening with that man, and in that case it is the minimal result of being violent verbaly to a woman just because you think you are a policeman or a lawyer idk. You are normalizing verbal violence. I know he was wrong at pushing him, but if you put yourself in his shoes and you see a man being danger to your family, you will want to intercept him.
10 likesIdeally, they would have talked about it, but do you really think that screaming madman was going to speak civilly?
That's why he will get old in prison,
Should’ve got more 🙄
5 likes@Palahume how would you react if saw someone you didn't know harassing your wife from a distance and you have no idea what his intentions are with her?
3 likes@Manuel ArangoYou can't possibly believe that the guy advancing on the person he just assaulted was going to "see what was happening." You can't be that naive. You pull your pants up like that when you are preparing to do something physical and moving in on someone you just attacked who is prone on the ground gives few options of a physical nature that isn't horrible. The moment he stopped was when the guy reached for the gun and not one moment before. You can't lie about this. It is in the video you are commenting on. I am not saying the guy didn't move back AFTER he knew he could not just beat up a defenseless person who he had once again just attacked from behind. The guy on the ground had no chance of escaping the advancing thug. Also just so you know, violence is defined as "behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something." Verbal violence is a ridiculous claim.
3 likes@WandererTheLost After the push, if the man just apoligized, there would not be any beating. If a man is screaming at your wife or family it’s reasonable to push him.. maybe he’d have beaten his ass if he continued yelling shit, or maybe he would just chase him away and go back with his children
6 likes@Tyler Pearson That's easy... You walk up and figure out what's going on, then determine what first of action needs to take place. Most things can be handled through talking. But you wouldn't know if violence is necessary unless you listen/talk first. 🤦
2 likes@Manuel Arango Go around pushing people who "deserve" it. I hope they respond in the correct way of calling the cops on you. If you are really lucky, you might be the next conversation I have in the comments section.
1 like@David I think the fact he waited till the guy was retreating made shooting the wrong choice but pulling a gun was the only thing that stopped that guy from moving in on him to beat his ass. Being assaulted for saying something even if it is confrontational is wrong and that guy was very obviously getting himself ready to move in on him in a position he could not easily leave. Anyone who says physical violence is ok because they don't like what a person is saying is a criminal. I think he was in the wrong for shooting but he had every right to feel threatened.
5 likes@WandererTheLost ? Go around yelling at women. If you have luck they will call the police, but if not, you will be beaten instead you shoot to kill your “agressor” who is defending his family and you will spend your life in prison.
6 likes@Palahume Dude is yelling at his wife. Mikey D was coming for his wife. He was taking steps. He was gonna finish it.
1 like@DSW22 That was not “stupid and trivial.” Parking in a handicapped parking spot without a reason is illegal. There are people who legitimately need to use that spot. Michael was doing his civic duty.
8 likes@Ainsley Oliver No, no he wasn't. He would have taken a picture of the car in the parking spot and reported it to the police. As he himself said before, he only started the confrontation because he had a weapon. It is not his civic duty to confront people committing a very minor crime, in fact it is his duty to REPORT the crime so that police may handle the rest, since that is their job.
7 likes@SECONDQUEST I wished they would look at the actions they are promoting and make better life decisions. I wouldn't be here arguing with them about how assaulting random people is wrong if I didn't want them to change and be a better person. I am emphasizing the effects of someone's actions to show them that maybe physical violence isn't the answer. Unless you are trying to say that it should be. Is that what you are saying? Are you saying that there is no consequences (justified or not) that you should consider before making such a rash decision? Did you not see what happened to the person in the video who thought how the commenter did?
3 likes@WandererTheLost Yeah it's a sticky situation, but a failed attempt to flex the stand your ground legislation. Defendant would've been better off pleading guilty and blaming the shooting on nerves rather then getting caught up in the lie "he was taking 2-3 running steps towards me"
1 like@David He should have not talked to the cops. Innocent or guilty, they are there to use your own words against you. They NEVER use what you say to defend you you. Even if they should.
0 likes@Palahume He should've yelled "back off" and save his shot. It's an unfortunate situation for everyone really, dude wasted some great years for him, he was 48 durirng the interrogation, he's gonna leave prison at around ~70 if he ever does. And well, the man who died, well, we all know why it sucks for their family.
2 likesThere are so many ifs but sadly this is how things went. Hope both families can heal.
Is that all ,???
0 likes@Santiago I completely agree. He didn't have to shoot and should have just yelled a warning.
2 likesLife would’ve been great
0 likesThat sucks no justice here. Self defense
0 likesNot long enough
1 like@Heather Tzogas I could, but then people like you who feel like they have some authority on who has the right to speak and what people's option's should be. You would think no one disagrees with you and you are just objectively right. Heaven forbid any kind of conversation that isn't 100% what you believe. Next you are going to tell me someone should come up and assault me for saying things you don't agree with. Violence against people who don't agree with you is justified right?
5 likes@WandererTheLost So that would be a no, right?
0 likes@Heather Tzogas I mean you are the one posting things with no content in them. State your opinion unless you are afraid of how it makes you look. It appears you are on the side of random street assault but if you are just here to tell people not to talk, that would be an interesting stance to take, in of all places, a comment section.
3 likes@WandererTheLost So that's another no, huh?
0 likes@Danielle Walker a lot of people tend to have a bias that black women don't "need" or deserve to be protected.
1 like@nullin void ah the good old "anyone i disagree with is racist"
0 likes@WandererTheLost Still no, huh?
0 likesOnly?
0 likes@JunkEt yea and if anything like that guy said against Micheal he didn’t shoot him in the foot or leg, it was somewhere that would possibly kill him.
0 likes@DSW22 he shouldn’t have initiated the violence.
1 like@mdo686 Rioters rioted, Kyle wanted to save the local businesses and population, rioters attacked him, Kyle attacked them.
1 likeIs being a year too young to own a gun really that much of a crime in comparison to having an entire mob armed to the teeth trying to kill a 17 year old? People only bring up "he was too young to own an AR15!!!" because theres literally nothing else to go on in attacking him.
That’s great but them kids still ain’t ever ganna get back there dad is so terrible
0 likes@WandererTheLost actually that’s completely speculatory, as the defendant stated no words were exchanged, there is no direct evidence to suggest that he was intending to beat the man up other than the fact that he pushed him and the step forward advance, it was a completely nonverbal exchange. You clearly have zero sympathy for this poor man who lost his life and the family Michael Drejka left fatherless and I suggest you take the time to rewatch this video, consider your intentions in this conversation, and really think about what if motivating you to stick up for a man who committed murder without a second thought on an unarmed man in front of his family. He died in front of his five year old son, do you have no shame?
2 likes@WandererTheLost Drejkas own testimony in the video you clearly didn’t watch is that he wasn’t afraid for his own life.
2 likesSo idk what all these “fear of my life” arguments are. Doesn’t make sense given the full context.
he deserves more. he will be locked up for 20 years, the victim's kinds can never see their dad again.
0 likes@Selin Binay Your level of conviction for a person who assaulted someone from behind baffles me. I would like to think in society, we are above the worry that someone would become physical violent on a person they don't like from behind. The shooter was doing nothing provocative except saying things the assaulter either didn't agree with or in a way he didn't like. Neither is justification for the attack. He then pulled up his pants as I am sure many people do right before they intend to do something physical while moving towards a person they just threw on the ground. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to guess where a physical attack from behind is going from there. All of that said, the punishment for just an assault should not be death but I contend that the man with the gun had every right to both assume that man was coming after him as he had ALREADY come after him. He was also in a position that left little chance for escape. Him dying in front of his child is terrible but he showed his intentions and that man who pulled the gun had every right to assume he was going to be attacked not only by the actual recorded attack but his actions after. Who are you to say that he would have not beaten the shooter to death? As you said, you have no direct evidence that he wouldn't have killed the guy he just attacked. I do have the direct evidence of showing he was a violent person who intended to at the very least be ready to continue being violent. You bring shame into this like that somehow makes your lack of facts or acknowledging the ACTUAL EVENTS that are recorded in front of you a strong defense. And before you say "well he was proven guilty," have you not seen innocent people on many of these videos go to jail. When you say things like you last line, you are trying to push feelings to stop a conversation you are not winning with any evidence as you put it. For shame.
1 like@WandererTheLost girl BYE I just explained to u from a legal standpoint why your point makes no sense and your response to me is a non objective argument about how assault is worse than murder you need to zip it up before u hurt yrself I’m done lmao
2 likes@WandererTheLost and by the way since you seem to be completely ignorant to the way law actually works, verbal assault and abuse IS a crime and the legal definition of assault does not require an actual physical confrontation to take place. You are talking about battery.
1 like@Palahume you should let some guy start yelling and threatening your family and see what you will do. probably nothing.
0 likes@Nick I'd investigate to see what's going on first... Not just run up blindly and assault someone. Lmfao 😆
1 like@Selin Binay I was going by the actual quoted definition of assault in the dictionary. And is that really your whole takeaway from a paragraph reply? You instead of engaging in any defensible points to anything I said, you argue that I don't know what assault is when I directly quoted it from a dictionary? Furthermore, at least in the US, verbal assault is not a crime. It is only considered assault if you promise or imply violence that you can then actually back up. If he was looking at the license plates to see if the person had committed a crime, it is not far to assume that they were thinking about the law and not standing there promising the hurt the person but that I would have to listen to the trial directly to find out. That said it definitely was not brought up in the video and unless you have some evidence to his accusation of threatening them, then you are just grasping at straws. It is kind of pathetic that is all you had to focus on after the whole paragraph I had giving points. That was all you found to criticize and even then you were not correct. I am surprised you didn't just go with the moral high ground again with no supporting evidence. Be so outraged that you can't bother coming up with an argument. Nothing like trying to shut down conversation because of feelings. I would love for you to have an argument. I am open to discussion. Too bad that is not what is happening.
1 likeIf he didn’t have a gun he wouldn’t have even said anything to the woman in the car. Lol
0 likes@Palahume You were doing well until the end. SYG law in Florida states he had every right to defend himself the way he did but don't let laws and statutes get in the way of you supporting the afrocentric bandwagon agenda in here.
0 likes@JunkEt You just don't understand or agree with Florida SYG law. It specifically allows "deadly force" to be used.....those words are in the statute so go read it and educate yourself.
0 likes@Danielle Walker Nope, McGlockton committed the first crime by pushing Drejka = assault and rightfully ate a bullet for it. Bullets are great teachers...hopefully now his sons will learn that they can't lay hands on a stranger if somebody is talking to/yelling at mommy for breaking the law.
1 like@Archer Nope. Talking to a stranger is not illegal and never warrants being pushed = assault.
1 like@Local_Brain_Error // Synaptic_Misfire_Detected To be fair, he owned the store... So he probably would have anyways.
0 likesif it was backwards he would walk free cause blm
0 likes@Sabrason He evidently wasn't "talking".
0 likes@DSW22 Damn right. Good explanation man. Don’t fuck with people. Period. Stay in your lane and this doesn’t happen
0 likes@Palahume You obviously don’t have children…and if you do God help them because you’re not programmed to.
0 likes@WandererTheLost He didn’t start a fight genius. He perceived a threat with his children present. I know that’s hard to comprehend.
2 likesHe shouldn’t have got 20 years. He shouldn’t have fired yet but he didn’t set out to kill him. He should have shot the leg if he had to.
0 likes@John Kordulak Clearly you aren't programmed to assess people accurately... Lmao 😆.
0 likes@DSW22 I hope ur not saying kyle rittenhouse was innocent because he was provoking people to be able to claim self defense
1 like@Jeremiah S Kyle put out a burning dumpster and that angered a bald guy who ended up chasing and assaulting him (Kyle). Kyle ran til he was cornered and the bald lunatic that was chasing him, shouted "F-CK YOUUUU" and charged Kyle. Kyle opened fire.
1 likeKyle was trying to help said bald lunatic but the mob was gathering and the hostile heat/attention was rising on him so he ran away, then people started chasing him and you know the rest.
If putting out a dumpster fire that was intended to be pushed towards a wall of cops is provoking then I guess thats your perspective, I cant judge.
@Sabrason @Sabrason This is straight up incorrect. No SYG law will allow the use of deadly force when it isn't justified. This is a case where the use of deadly force was not justified because the subject in question was retreating at the time the gun was pulled, and no further acts of violence occurred upon the individual who fired. In fact no further threat, implicit or explicit seems to have occurred. Not to mention the subject was only pushed, he wasn't hit over the head with a blunt object, he wasn't stabbed, and generally he wasn't injured in such a way as to cause grievous bodily harm or death.
2 likesThe SYG law does not permit you to fire upon a retreating individual. Now if he was pushed and then his attacker continued his assault that's a different story, but that's not what happened here. Besides this is all a moot point anyway because he was found by a jury to be in the wrong here. Unless the jury and the judge are all not as informed about the statute as you, which seems to be what you are implying here, I would say he was wrong.
I sincerely hope for everyone's safety that you do not carry a firearm.
@Palahume The guy was instigating a fight with a woman sitting in a car with her children in the backseat. Any husband walking out would’ve had an issue with that. I know Minewood. He’s lucky all that happened was he got shoved
0 likes@Archer Really, because the video proves he was talking to her.
0 likes@John Kordulak By that logic the guy with the gun didn't just perceive a threat but acted on actual assault. You are promoting violence against people talking in ways you don't like. Drejka was not threatening them. He was telling them they broke the law. The funny part is they did break the law. Then when Drejka was telling them, he was pushed from behind and thrown to the ground. The guy then pulls up his pants and is ready to move in. That is not the action of someone defending someone. After he threw him to the ground he wasn't any threat to hurt them but that man wanted to hurt Drejka again because of words. IT IS ON THE VIDEO. From what you are saying, I should be able to beat you for your words on here. Words are not going to attack you. The person was not there to assault them. He said something they didn't like. Even giving them the most favorable opinion of him thinking there was a threat, he didn't respond by asking what was going on. He was mad and attacked. That is not a reasonable opening to a situation which AT BEST he didn't know well as he had just got there. You mentioned boarder policy as well. It sounds like you are the type of person to make this some sort of race thing and also try and change the argument because they have nothing that supports them. It is really kind of sad. Come back when you have more then emotions. It really makes you look like an idiot when you think that you can win an argument by trying to change the subject.
0 likes@Connie Talking is not instigating a fight. Having a different opinion is not justification for violence. She was not being threatened. You thinking that it is ok to hurt someone who is saying something you don't like. That is the reason there is as much violence as there is. Why would it be ok for someone to be attacked for voicing an opinion. You're doing it right here and not everyone agrees with you here, but I don't think you should be assaulted for it. You seem to think that would be fine and that actually scares me. He was not there threatening the kids or her safety. Being upset is not a justification for violence and if you think it is, that makes you a criminal.
2 likes@Connie I would hardly call someone questioning another person about handicap tags a "fight". Also, the truth is, the vast majority of people (including husbands) would not run up and shove someone like that guy did without knowing what was going on. He should have known by doing so he was risking his life by not knowing how the other person would react. Simply foolish behavior.🤦
1 like@Sabrason Statements from witnesses (and to an extent the video) proves he was making a racket and being argumentative. He was the aggressor, and if anyone wants stand your ground to have any legs, then it is the deceased who everyone should acknowledge had the right to defend their family from that aggressor.
3 likesThey shooters own words after a previous incident show he knew he was the aggressor in similar incidents, and he was causing himself trouble. He even said he couldn't help himself (and I doubt he knew where he could turn for help).
So no: I don't buy this "Drejka was innocent" or "Drejka was defending himself" mentality. He was the instigator of the incident, the aggressor, and the last person with any realistic right to stand his ground.
@Danielle Walker - But the problem is Drekja did fall down and that makes it assault. Battery is raising and arm/leg or object at someone, and battery is phyically causing harm.
0 likes@JunkEt - LOL - Apparently you need to read the law on assault. - Putting your hands on someone is assault. Look up the legal definition. People need to keep their hands to themselves - that is part of the law - it falls under "assault".
0 likes@Sabrason Yes, he was so upset about illegal parking that he parked illegally himself.
2 likesHe got upset over a lot of things, and repeatedly waved a gun around.
He threatened a few people, and commented that people were lucky he didn't blow their heads off.
He commented to the owner of this store that he kept getting himself into trouble, but couldn't help himself, and this is the real shame. He obviously needed help, but didn't know how to get it. Hence he continued to get triggered over things that he should have ignored (given he did these things himself), and that triggering led to him behaving in an agressive and abusive manner several times before this particular incident.
I have no reason, given his history, to believe he was "talking" or being generally peacable, and plenty of reasons to suppose this incident was caused by him behaving in an aggressive and abusive manner.
I think it would have been better, and this incident wouldn't have occurred, if he could have gotten the help he desperately needed. Instead a man is dead, and another is in prison, which suits noone.
@Nun Ya Ok? And? I never said it wasn't assualt or even implied that. I never even brought that up. I brought up the amount of force used, and how I share the opinion of the jury in that it was excessive.
0 likesI know this case is serious but I had to point out the man in the white shirt getting a good sleep in court at 48:40.
0 likes@Palahume He didn’t own the store it was just his local store. He probably thought he owned it like an entitled jerk but he didn’t own it.
2 likes@Palahume See the problem with you people going in here and saying that "he shouldn't have pushed him over" just lets people argue that he was in the right to shoot him, which he was not, in anyway whatsoever. Of course you shouldn't, or should I say, "your not allowed" to push people over. It doesn't really matter though because at the end of the day, the guy shot him and killed him. Like what is wrong with you, your basically saying it was his fault he got shot, like what lol, so if you push someone down, and they shoot you, and you die, your saying its your fault that they decided to take out a gun and shoot you.
0 likes@JunkEt See the problem with you people going in here and saying that "he shouldn't have pushed him over" just lets the worse people argue that he was in some way in the right to shoot him, which he was not, in anyway whatsoever. I know your not saying that, but your allowing other people to say that.
0 likesShould have gotten more, the amount of people in these comments saying he was somewhat in the right for doing what he did is depressing.
2 likes@Local_Brain_Error // Synaptic_Misfire_Detected Ah I see. If that's the case, then he was just being a major Karen. Still not sure that deserved to be assaulted though...🤔
0 likesShould have life
0 likesupdate: i just noticed they have the same name and I'm crying over it cfghmv
0 likesWOW this guy was looking for trouble and he found it, too bad the shopper got killed I just hope a guy walking around with a loaded gun in his pocket and looking for someone else with a minor infraction to bully unloads his cowardly venom and ends up killing the poor victim. SAD. Boy it makes you wonder what he’s going to do to minor infractions he finds in prison. Ha. Ha. Ha. Seriously hope he never sees freedom. Maybe some hard mean time in solitary and psych ward.
0 likesShould have gotten longer
0 likes@Archer "Yes, he was so upset about illegal parking that he parked illegally himself.
0 likesHe got upset over a lot of things, and repeatedly waved a gun around.
He threatened a few people, and commented that people were lucky he didn't blow their heads off.
He commented to the owner of this store that he kept getting himself into trouble, but couldn't help himself, and this is the real shame. He obviously needed help, but didn't know how to get it. Hence he continued to get triggered over things that he should have ignored (given he did these things himself), and that triggering led to him behaving in an agressive and abusive manner several times before this particular incident."
THE ABOVE IS ALL COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY IRRELEVANT TO THE INCIDENT THAT OCCURRED.
You have no reason (OTHER THAN THE VIDEO THAT PROVES HE WAS ONLY TALKING/ARGUING), given his history (WHICH IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT TO THE CASE), to believe he was "talking" (VIDEO PROVED HE DID NOTHING BUT TALK TO JACOBS!) or being generally peacable,(TALKING IS PEACEFUL) and plenty of reasons to suppose this incident was caused by him behaving in an aggressive and abusive manner (AGAIN, TALKING/HAVING A HEATED DISCUSSION ABOUT JACOBS BREAKING HC PARKING LAWS IS NOT ILLEGAL AND PERFECTLY WITHIN HIS RIGHT).
McGlockton was a deadbeat loser and dreg of society with a history of assault, a drug addict husband/father high on MDMA in front of kids, driving his kids around while high on MDMA, high on MDMA when he assaulted a guy almost twice his age - in front of kids and bled out - in front of his kids. Society is far better off without him and so are his kids.
@VELI That's only because you don't understand or agree with Florida's SYG law which clearly states that deadly force can be used if fear of bodily harm is present. McGlockton caused bodily harm by initiating the assault so Drejka using a gun was not only justified it was even more justified because it was used to prevent ADDITIONAL bodily harm.
0 likes@Sabrason That wasn't my point, my point is that your saying in that situation you would have shot someone too, which makes you a horrible person.
0 likes@Palahume He was known to cause trouble all the time in that parking lot. He is the very type of gun owner who should not own a gun. Dude was just itching to use it. Listen to him talk as if it's his store. Territorial loser who felt tough cause of a gun.. The guy's 3 young children and his wife was in the car it's a natural reaction to defend you family.
0 likes@Palahume Clearly you don't have the full story. This dude did this all the time. He was empowered from his gun and was just itcbing/looking for a chance to use it. If it wasn't this time it would be another time. You say if this guy didn't push him then all would have been fine. How do you know? They could have kept arguing and he may have done the same thing. Truth is if he didn't approached the family and start yelling at a woman and her three kids in the back seat, which is fucking wack to begin with, nothing would have happened and he wouldn't be doing 20 years for manslaughter and 4 children wouldn't be without their father. Did you even watch the video? He has issues bro. He should have just minded his own business. This is the perfect example of a terrible gun owner.
0 likes@Archer give it up dude didn't even watch the video. He is just defending his fellow karen.
0 likesThe irony is that he was parked illegally himself and complaining about someone else parking in a handicap spot. Smdh.
0 likes@Sabrason Honestly: you're advocating for a situation where any nutcase can come and terrorise you or your family, with "stand your ground" as their trump card against you trying to defend yourself.
0 likesThe guys mental state absolutely is relevant because you keep arguing as though he was just a normal guy talking. Witnesses stated that he wasn't just talking. The video shows it, but you're too blinded by some weird political motive to see it.
@Tommy Lin I agree totally. I actually think they both acted like idiots.
0 likes20 years of prison with parole, that's so cheap for intentionally killing another person. I guess being white helped him a lot
0 likesGood! I am all for carrying a firearm and definitely pro second amendment. But this shit here absolutely was not justifiable homicide. It was murder.
0 likesWas the jury made aware of the defendant’s prior history of aggravation to other motorists, admissible in this case? Or does Florida law not allow a persons previous conduct to be included in evidence?
0 likesI’m from Sydney, Australia.
@YouTubeUser747 What are you even talking about lmao
0 likes@YouTubeUser747 If you can't make a comment that makes any sense, that is your fault...Lmfao 😆🤦
1 like@Palahume work on your reading comprehension kiddie. You’ll go places. But with your current ability...yeah you’re headed for the short bus pal 🤣🤣
1 like@Tommy Lin McGlockton was a drug addict high on MDMA who had a history of assault including a PO so he "did this all the time" also. This time, he assaulted the wrong guy and died. Lesson learned.
0 likes@Sabrason does that make his life worth any less? Does that make this shooting any more justified? If no then wtf are you talking about!? Doesn't change anything in this case. Stop defending this action. He pushed someone who was yelling at his family cause he was defending them. Thus guy illegally killed him. Do you think we should just shoot people who push us? Do you own a gun cause if this is how you feel you should turn in your permit.
1 like@YouTubeUser747 Well then I'll see you there, cause I know you're already on it. Lmfao 🤣
0 likesso as soon as his child becomes adult, the man who killed his father will be free.
0 likesOnly 20
1 likeLesson to all, keep your hands to yourself, live and learn... Oh wait 😂
1 likenot enough smh
0 likes@tungusta Enjoy that word game rabbit hole of yours
0 likes@Tommy Lin Well, the fact that McGlockton was a horrible father and drug addict high on MDMA at the time and had a history of assaulting a PO makes his life worthless, so yeah. We certainly don't need those dregs of society living among us, that's for sure.
1 likeGood decision by the judge
0 likesShould have been given life or, at the very least, 60 years, just to ensure he doesnt go around being a Karen and then shooting people who are angry when their family members are practically getting stalked and harassed by him after he intentionally created an environment that made the wife and the kids feel threatened and unsafe. Please dont blame the father for reacting that way towards a man who was being intentionally hostile towards his wife and kids over gd parking.
2 likes@Sabrason talking about being high on ecstasy like it's the most morally bankrupt thing a person could do is hilarious. Even if someone was addicted to "hard" drugs and had assaulted a cop, they're still a human being with fundamental rights and inherent worth. You saying that people who don't cling to your conservative ideals are better off dead is super sus
0 likes@Palahume them you didn't watch the video. In the interview the cops DIRECTLY address that very aspect: "instigating and provoked a confrontation over a handicapped parking".
1 like@Curtis Jackson Oh, thanks for letting me know that I didn't really watch the video...I want sure what I actually did, cause you know... Others know more about what I do than I do..lmao 😆😉🤦
0 likes@WandererTheLost he shouldn't have pushed him down, but there was no need for a confrontation at all. The victim did move towards the shooter after pushing him, but looked like he was intimidating him and not attacking him physically. There's no justification for him to shoot, especially once the victim started backing away.
0 likes@DSW22 kyle went out looking for trouble and he found it.
0 likes@Palahume bye.
0 likes@Palahume he was being a karen. Its a convenient store. Not an important retail place like the mall or amusement park where a handicap spot is really needed. He was in the wrong place to think he can be handicap karen and shoot ppl that dont have the tag. Would hate for the same to happen to that baby in your picture. 🥲
0 likes@Bryan Wölfe You feel bad? What about the fatherless kids? Youre sick
0 likes@Palahume That would be horrid if the same happened to Gideon. If someone shot him would you change your point of view?
0 likes@Palahume Lets wait until Gideon is older ☺️See if he gets shot my a stranger for taking up for his wife. Hits home when its someone you love huh? Keep Gideon safe.
0 likes@L 432hz you’re sick and the black guy didn’t have to get aggressive 👌🏻 he didn’t know what the issue was in the first place.
0 likes@L 432hz Bye. Thanks for playing. Lmao 😆
0 likes@L 432hz That will never happen though because Gideon will know better than to just run up and push summer random dude down, like the tool in this video did. He'll be raised far better than that and will know the appropriate way to act. 🤦
0 likesThis is why I live in the state I do, u would never be found guilty, i dont remember alot of this but if push someone to the ground and walk up on them ur gonna get shot, point blank dont assault someone u never know what's gonna happen and alot of the time especially in my state its perfectly legal, especially if ur defense is correct, if he pushed u and kept approaching, even if all he did was push you and u hit ur head and feel like he could take ur weapon, I think it can be considered too far see now I'm talking myself in and out of if its justified it all depends
0 likesIt's not worth dying for to defend ur families pride, it's never worth it, he went out there worse case(which happened he gets killed) best case he catches an assault charge over a mistake he caused, yes fighting over a dumb parking spot doesnt mean anything to him but to some people it's a big deal..... and he lost his life over it, what most people dont seem to understand is dont let ur pride and ur emotions get u in trouble or killed, his wife I'm sure would much rather him be here right now then defend her honor by assaulting someone elderly. If he'd went out there and apologized or just left the area, or at the very least just yelled at the guy without violence we would have never heard about this. U never know how someone is going to react, I've heard so many stories of people getting road rage flipping someone off or yelling or following them only to end up getting shot, or in most cases their car shot up, just situations that u should never be involved with
0 likes@Palahume if you go around looking for trouble you can’t expect flowers. this guy had harassed people before and finally found himself with someone who wasn’t willing to take none of his shit. he knew that at some point he’d get his ass beaten, but of course he being the coward he is couldn’t take the heat and shot at him.
0 likes@Marcello Those words could never be more ironic... "If you go around looking for trouble (parking in places that aren't designed for you and assaulting people unnecessarily by shoving them to the ground)", then you're bound to get shot one day. The assailant should have known better and I'm sure that whole situation could have been resolved a better way. 🤔🤦
2 likes@Palahumeman pointed his gun at people before and you still think that “it could’ve ended differently”, yea no. if it wasn’t this guy, then it was going to be someone else. he had a gun ready with him in case of someone reacting, your argument is weak. he had no reason to shoot at the victim, and it was proven in court as well. there are many things you could do that aren’t defending criminals in youtube comments.
0 likes@Marcello "He had no reason to shoot.."
0 likesYea... Except for being violently diced to the ground for no apparent reason. 🤦
Good
0 likesBro even if I was pushed to the floor I wouldn't shoot the guy who did it wtf? There's getting beat up and there's getting killed. Guns should always be a last resort especially if the "attacker" doesn't have a deadly weapon
1 likeNot enough
0 likes@Archer has the most valid point here. Even if he was pushed down. You just shoot somebody? Cause you were on the ground, but still had the higher ground? I don’t understand. He got pushed, because the defender of the family saw a threat, harassing the nurturer of the family. Obviously he is the victor here, however, because the coward is still alive, unfortunately.
0 likesNOT ENOUGH
0 likesTy. I’ll finish watching now
0 likes@DSW22 "being an a** justified physical assault"
0 likesim glad you're not the one with the gun!
@WandererTheLost I actually agree 20 years is excessive, its just that the defence team he has were awful
0 likes@the truth ok. You sound emotional. An innocent person, woman, black woman was killed for no reason.
0 likesWhat do other situations have to do with this?
@nullin void Thank you for the love! So your saying you need to be emotional to be disgusted when a man knocks out his girl, his black girl? That makes zero sense. How bout you familiarize yourself with what your actually talking about & then try again. No woman was killed here. Smfh throwing insults when you have NO CLUE what your talking about. Typical
0 likes@nullin void Also you were talking bout black WOMEN not just this black WOMAN so you made every situation have something to do with it. That's what the Ray Rice incident has to do with this. Your trying to twist it now cause I called out your beyond inaccurate statement which is not very surprising seeing as you don't know what your talking about in the 1st place.
0 likes@DSW22 he shouldn’t have put his grubby hands on him. That’s what happens when you always respond with compulsive violence. Marquiese got a reality check
0 likesNot long enough, that was outright murder
0 likes@Palahume I agree totally with you it's all so sad anyway
0 likes@DSW22 no one has a right to do violence over your words. You can never justify violence in the situation. Mr Drejka however once his gun was drawn waited for police and charged the man with assault.
0 likes@Danielle Walker someone yelling at your wife is no means for assault. Granted he should have pulled the gun and backed off to his vehicle and called police. Charged the man with assault.
0 likesWhy not like 40-60 years - sure the other dude should have payed or sat some time for his assault aswell but this guy deserves even longer
0 likes20 years? Is all that man’s life is worth? What a shame. He deserves life in prison
0 likesway to spoil the recommended trial video on the right
0 likes@KoilBooly They actually weren't though but ok, and I'm not acting that way at all I never claimed that I would have done any different in that situation, so you bringing that up makes absolutely no sense.
0 likes@Rip Cartier ok
0 likesI just don't understand why the family was parked in a handicapped spot. Could they not park 10 extra feet away from the curb in a legal space? The whole thing is just stupid. Why tf were they even there? Like this could have been avoided if Drejka minded his own business, but it could have been avoided as well if they had just parked...legally.
0 likes@Connie Do you also park in a handicapped spot for fun? Like, I just don't understand why they did that to begin with.
0 likesThank you for telling me that. No one else was.
0 likes@Sebastian .Mel. Michaelis Awh shut up
0 likesPoint is he’s not a cop. You pick up your phone like a normal Karen and make a complaint if it’s that serious. No one deserved to die. Like you said he shudda minded his own business and like I said call a real cop. Just because you have a gun on your waste and you feel brave doesn’t make you a cop. He felt brave and he was looking for trouble bc if that gun was at home nun of that would have transpired.
@Sebastian .Mel. Michaelis Being called a Karen on social media for a month would’ve been a lot better than time in prison.
0 likes@DSW22 you know, If you re-watch the video, Marquise keeps moving towards Drejka after pushing him down. He only stops and backs up when the gun starts coming out. I had first disbelieved Drejka when he said that Marquiese took a step towards him. I now believe he was right about the forward step, but wrong if he said that the step happened after the gun came out. Marquise wasn't done with the pursuit, even after the shove. If MK had not had the gun, I think Marquise was still intent on further battering Drejka, if he had kept talking in any way unapologetically. The skinned arm was completely Marquise's fault. When you shove someone, you take responsibility for whatever happens to them until they regain control of their situation. In the video where the narrator says "Marquise sees this, and starts backing up", the narrator SHOULD have said, "Marquise sees this, and reverses his forward motion."
0 likes@V L It isn't about whether or not someone "deserves" to die, its about imminent threat.
0 likesPeople have been kicked and stomped while on the ground and killed in his same situation
good. Should be more.
0 likesI always told myself if I ever owned a weapon . Wich i don't and never will because it is illegal in the state I live in , but if I was able to or lived in a state where u can carry , I would never leave my house with it for any reason . It will jus be home for protection purpose only and protection of my family . When someone Carry's it jus opens the window for you to use it in any little situation. Even if I got into a fight I wouldn't get any weapon . It would literally have to be like someone coming into my home to cause harm or death to me and my family . That's exactly what happen to this dude . He carried a weapon and any little situation or argument give him the reason to fire his weapon
0 likesAt least justice was served since that rarely happens now a days. Especially in places like the US, England, and Japan.
0 likesi'm shocked that he only got 20 years
0 likesThis is why you do not speak to the investigator until you have a lawyer present - Miranda says "Anything you say can and will be used against you..."
0 likesIt does NOT say "Anything you say might let you go free" or "Anything you say will be used as evidence FOR your defense".
Be as innocent as an angel, get a lawyer. The slightest misremembering of a single fact can slaughter you in court. A lawyer will stop you from talking yourself into prison.
Let's talk about how the detectives interrogation started off with unhooking Drejka's cuffs.... Pure genius move.
558 likesThis guy now for sure, 100% thinks he is being let off the hook, lets his guard down and buries himself.
Replies (9)
@M D it really does not.
35 likesMany interrogation rooms have tables with metal loops in them for the specific purpose of running chain through.
It has everything to do with what message they are trying to convey and to whom.
@M D further still, often the individual is not even cuffed in the first place.
13 likesThey just ask them to come down to the station for a chat. And for some reason they actually come down.
....
So no.
@drebk well put!
1 likeM D he’s literally right tho LOL
14 likes@M D I don't like to edit.
11 likesAlso, when you say not X, you're just plain wrong.
So if the tale is not riveting, you shall take most of the responsibility. Perhaps if your counter had any semblance of support.
I was more impressed with their choice in personnel to do the interview, perhaps it was coincidence due to region but looked like a bunch of “good ole boys” that he thought he’d get props from. His language made me laugh and I can imagine the officers thought it was a gas too. Laughed out loud at the part where he used “force multiplier “ or whatever and it just fell dead.
8 likesThey are so smart. I hope to never be in that position of being interrogated. If I was though I would definitely get a lawyer immediately.
2 likes@titlewave yup
0 likes"buries himself", exactly the verb I was thinking of the entire time through the interview as he made more and more damaging statements for his defence.
0 likesThe defense said the color being off, and the wavy lines makes the video not 100% accurate. 🤦🏽♀️ Sir, it still shows what happened you potato!
1 likei honestly dont see that he feels any remorse from what he did he feels he did the correct thing his just crazy i feel sorry for the victim family n his family for having a crazy person, omg he was pushed by the victim for yelling at his wife or girfriend dont get things twisted
0 likesIf he really thought he was at harm, I think he could have made the dude back off from just pointing the gun at him. Shooting the guy was without a reasonable doubt, murder. I'm glad people like this get locked up, I'm just sad he took that family's father forever.
1 likeReplies (6)
He gets locked up but he’s alive. Dude that shoved him is dead. There is a clear and obvious message to this situation/case.
0 likes@The Blue Rock and what is that message?
0 likes@Herbert West never underestimate your opponent. Or, don’t put your hands on someone and expect them to play the same rules as you. Thought this was common sense...I mean if it wasn’t obvious can you go around putting hands on people and expect not to get hurt?
1 like@Skull Crusade343 nah if the man knew the white dude had a gun would he still had shoved him?
0 likes@The Blue Rock I don't get your point. Obviously I don't like any of the things they did, shoving people isn't a solution. Then again, shooting someone isn't either. Both of them had issues controlling their anger when confronted.
0 likesAnd to answer your question, in my opinion, no one in their right mind would threaten someone with a gun, heck I wouldn't shove someone wielding a knife.
@Skull Crusade343 ok the guy who shoved him was wrong wrong end of discussion.
0 likesHe acts as if he’s another officer. Fact he used terms as “force multiplier” “neutralize the threat” “clear the area” “negative” shows this guy was looking to (in his mind) legally kill someone. 100% bwanna be L.E.O. but only to kill. He was simply pushed yet he says tackled.
1 likeReplies (2)
Yep, he had some serious delusions of grandeur...
0 likesLike Buzz Lightyear
0 likesHeight of hypocrisy? parking illegally to argue with someone else parked illegally. Shows how self righteous he thinks he is.
614 likesReplies (11)
That’s a great point
28 likesHe is of the mindset that he can do whatever he wants. It’s everyone else they has to follow the rules.
31 likes@The 4th Reich how he managed to get a permit? I'll never know
4 likes@The 4th Reich No, he isn't. His mother is. He says so in the interview.
14 likes@Laika Thunder Child Exactly what the Judge said today @ sentencing. 20yrs
6 likesSome asshole looking for problems! Hoping to have to use his big man weapon, and looked for any reason to!! Can’t stand people like this!
8 likesI personally ran into a busy body just like this with my daughter last summer! We were at Lowe’s, and they had a sale on hanging baskets of petunias for $5 apiece (they were red white and purple, for Independence Day, and they were clearing them out as the holiday had passed). I bought 10 baskets ($50 worth, we have a half acre garden, and a swimming pool, so plenty of room for them. I just don’t find 10 THAT over the top!). We hadn’t planned on this large flower purchase, and my daughter, who was 16 and a new driver at the time, was driving. She drives a small car and granted the flowers stuffed inside of it looked a little ridiculous, and a tad overkill, but I had loaded them off of a set of hanging bars right in front of the stores front doors (in front of Lowe’s employees, and other customers coming in and out) and in a normal, calm way (not like I was trying to grab as many as I could and GO!!).
Anyway, I had just finished loading the flowers, rolling the cart back up, and was getting in the car when my daughter noticed in her side mirror that there was a woman behind her car.
Apparently this busy body old bag thought it looked suspicious and assumed that we were stealing them, and she nominated herself Lowe’s security, and was taking pics of my daughters license plate. This didn’t click for us at the time (because we weren’t doing anything wrong)!!
So she then walked up (as I was putting on my seatbelt and getting settled in the car) to the drivers window and my naive sweet trusting RULE ORIENTED daughter put the window down to see what she wanted, at which time she shoved her camera in my daughters face, continued filming both of us and the flowers in the car, and asked us what we thought we were doing, and then for a RECEIPT for the flowers!!!! Can you imagine!?!
I told her I don’t owe you an explanation for ANYTHING, lady! At which time she said she was calling the police. I said you GO RIGHT AHEAD! Seems to me like THAT would be the APPROPRIATE thing to do!!!
Anyway my scared daughter (she thought it was going to devolve) drove away at that point, but I had to make her pull over about 500 feet away (in the same parking lot but where PSYCHO BROAD couldn’t see us and come continue her inquisition and videoing) so that she could calm down enough to drive home safely (upset, shaking, mad about being video’d by some STRANGER, and with a car FULL of petunias)!
I’ve played that incident over in my mind at least 20 times since it happened, wishing I’d have handled things differently. Maybe teach the BUSY BODY A LESSON! (Not physically of course- but possibly driving away WITH her iPhone.. which I’d have of course taken directly to the police station, so that SHE could explain WHY she was trespassing, accosting and being OBNOXIOUS)! In most of those scenarios, it’s probably a good thing I wasn’t quick witted at that moment, because it likely WOULD have devolved a bit! 🤬
Anyway, that’s the story of my run in with a busy body bitch! They’re out there! I can’t IMAGINE behaving like that! Inserting myself into ANY situation like she did, and especially how this guy did. Terrible. At least crazy loony bitch didn’t fire a GUN at anyone!!
Some people are simply RIDICULOUS!!!
Jubilee So was the deceased.
0 likesAlex Xela - By removing the man that was shouting into the car where his wife and children were. If the deceased were a white man your comments would be a lot different. We have to start checking ourselves for prejudices. Let’s be honest.
2 likesJimmy Pesto Let us be honest and admit that the deceased was wrong to do what he did. The shooter was also wrong to do what he did after. I don't see him as deserving of the kind of assault that could have killed him, which is what the deceased did.
1 likeIs that honest enough for ya?
Alex Xela - No it’s actually not enough if I’m being honest. The deceased pushed him after hearing his wife yelling outside, and going outside to see a man aggressively shouting into the car that his wife and children were in. His job was to remove that threat away from him family. He removed the threat and stepped back. The fact is, the man was shot as a result of pushing the shooter. But the shooter wouldn’t have been pushed if he hadn’t approached the car in the first place. So if anybody is to blame it’s the person who initiated the entire altercation. He’s not a police officer or security so it wasn’t his place to address them about where they parked. There are people payed to handle those situation so he and others don’t have to. He could’ve called the police and let THEM do their job. If these were 2 white men you’d see more clearly but your eyes and brain are blocked by your prejudice. You’re not allowing yourself to see past it. That man would’ve found any reason to use that gun and you would’ve found any reason to justify that use.
2 likesAlex Xela - Hey Alex, you deleted your response (I assume you knew how crazy you sounded) so I’ll post it back so I could respond.
3 likes“As I said, he wasn't doing anything that warranted such a blind sided push which could have even killed the shooter. If he had survived he'd be charged with assault.” - Alex Xela
Excuse the deceased for blindsiding the shooter and catching him off guard while he was busy screaming at his wife and children. How could that push have killed him? The only thing he got was a fake wrist injury which was later revealed to be fake. Let’s not talk about what COULD’VE happened and let’s focus on what DID happen. Again, you’ll play devil’s advocate in the shooters favor no matter what because you’re a racist who will defend him no matter what. The man could’ve came out speaking peacefully and you’d argue that the way his hands were moving were threatening. Despicable.
This guy talks like Mac from 'It's Alway Sunny In Philadelphia' in the episode where he's bragging about his his ability to assess threats. I wonder if he ever uses the phrase 'ocular patdown'.
1 likeReplies (1)
OMG I was thinking the same thing!
1 likeguys hear me out what IF, he just fucking minded his business, went into the store, did his thing and got the fuck out? wild idea ?
2 likeshe dehumanized them .. even if I was annoyed at her being parked there I would've backed off and left once I saw kids in the car .. but he didn't see them as a family
0 likesA He said a clear threat against his life..the defence attorney should be charged with lying.
1 likeCan we just take a minute to all agree that the “what pretending to be crazy looks like” has snowballed into everyone getting recommended all of his other videos and thus watching them all ?
20278 likesReplies (471)
Oh, I'd watched all of them before I got a notification for that one. It did get me wanting to go back and rewatch them all though. So, here I am.
343 likesI have watched all his videos in two days the vietnam vet one was well done
81 likesYup
34 likes@Andrew Jenkins Same
6 likeswait thats how i got here too
73 likesLiterally never heard of this until that video popped out of no where now I’m watching hour long YouTube videos daily💯💪🏽👌🏽
104 likesAnd this video was posted a year ago and has comments a minute before my first one🤯
18 likesI feel personally attacked lol
32 likesSame. His breakdowns on that idiot were legit
26 likesThat’s why I’m here 😂
17 likesyep
3 likesAgreed. Wish he had more videos though. Breezed through them all in a day.
11 likesAhhh... I'm not the only one.
5 likesLol yep. Couple days ago I got that video recommended been watching him every since
5 likesTrue
0 likesTHATS the one that got recommended to me. I’ve already watched all of his videos in like 3 days lol
7 likesThe question is...
12 likesWhy have WE been targeted with these videos?
Eerie
N-..... no u don’t know that
4 likesFr I'm out here tryna make my own prosecutions like I'm not laying in bed at 2 am
5 likesGet out of my computer NSA agent
8 likesOop.. yea that's exactly what happened to me. I'm in love with this content. Also seeing that kid try and self harm with a band-aid. It's surreal how violent and stupid these people can be.
7 likesCorrect
1 likeI started watching him after the Story of Jeff.
2 likesWas thinking about that seconds before I saw your comment lol.
2 likesGreat job on these policemen btw.
That is exactly what happened
2 likesYeah and Jennifer Pan got me going 😅, it's so interesting and informative about the law and what happens in courts and investigations
0 likesYes i agree and that demon got some funky music taste and i like it
3 likesSame
0 likesOMG SO TRUE
0 likesNew viewer as well, true crime is a lot cooler than I thought it was.
0 likesYes
0 likesLiterally binging the whole channel since I saw that one lol crazy how all you need is one hit video and you’re on the track to fame !
2 likesDamn! That’s true
0 likesAbsolutely!! Damn!
0 likesI got hooked by guilty until proven innocent
1 likeYes
0 likesI started watching these last nights after that video and I’m honestly really glad I found that video
0 likesYes this channel is gold
0 likesI’ve been binging it for days
1 likeSo happy it’s not just me.
1 likeRight?!
0 likeslmao we all livin the same life
0 likesYes!!!! Since that day I’ve watched literally ALLLLL the videos. This is the last one 😩 I’m really sad. How did I not know about this channel with how many millions of views they get?!?
3 likestrue, but I love it! :D
0 likesnot for me i havent watched that one yet but i keep hearing abt it. "guilty until proven innocent" is why im here
2 likesLITERALLY i got that recommended to me 2 days ago, and i haven’t been watching anything else since
2 likeslmao it all started with that video me too haha
0 likesNo regrets!!!
0 likesThat is exactly my situation. And now I'm rewatching them all bc I was laughing so hard at Stephanie the sociopath and her ridiculous facial expressions that my family became curious so now we're just binging them all on tv. And I didn't think this kind of thing would interest me. I only really watch YT for ghost hunts
0 likes@Geno I saw a community post, I believe, maybe 2 days ago that said many more are to come and much more frequently. I think YT is pushing the channel bc it's about to change into a more regular upload kind of thing
0 likesexactly what happened to me
0 likesThat's how I got here. Well it got recommended to my son, he watched it then put me on it. Now I'm hooked.
0 likesI’m glad I got the recommendation because this is the most interesting YouTube channel I’ve come across
1 likeYep. I'm binge watching all of them!
0 likesYes 🙋
0 likesUhhhh that’s exactly what happened in my case... crazy!
1 likeSame
0 likesoh yea always
0 likesYep
0 likesMatrix bro
1 likeI’ve already seen this. But I’m doing the rounds again. And I am very giddy.
0 likesYes...but ehy is this accurate
0 likesShit lmao this is spot on
0 likesNo I’ve been watching him for ages and I’m rewatching them all now
0 likesHaha yea..
0 likesExactly yes
0 likesBro I’m addicted I never watch videos that are this long but it’s an exception. This dude has gotten like 400k subs since that came out
0 likesTRUEEE
0 likesYeah
0 likesoh my god yea
0 likesI'm re-watching them all after that. This is an amazing channel, with great content!
0 likesIt's so creepy how thousands of people including me are doing the exact same thing. I'd be interested to see the social blade over the last two days
0 likesDUDE for real, this is so fascinating! I never considered myself a "true crime" buff but I think I need to get into it, a lot of this stuff is really compelling watching.
0 likesI’ve watched almost this entire channel because of that one video lmao
1 likedude i havent heard something that true in a while wtf lmfaoooo aye but that video was interesting atleast also lmfao
0 likesYep
0 likesExactly
0 likesI'm french and i have no idea why i gotthis in my feed,but i have no regrets
0 likesyes
0 likesYeah lol
0 likesyou bet
0 likesliterally
0 likesDamn the algorithm got us all
0 likesI binge watcher his whole channel in 3 days
0 likesYUP
0 likesLOL You got it man.
0 likesI'm starting from the beginning
0 likesThis is true
0 likesNot just me then
0 likesYessss
0 likesyeah thats what happened to me now i have a new found interest in criminal psychology lol
0 likesYuuuup
0 likesI remember watching the Stephen McDaniel one a long time ago, but the 'what pretending to be crazy looks like' is what got me into the rabbit hole, yeah.
0 likesYep, exactly
0 likesits been a wild road from there
0 likesТочно) Даже в России.
0 likesliterally popped up yesterday and I already watched a bunch of his videos since
0 likeslmao exactly
0 likeslmao exactly
0 likes👍 yes
0 likesAny similar channels out there which have real footage ?
0 likesI am craving for more, 😂😂
@shobith shetty I was wrong. It was actually just a pinned comment on the "what pretending to be crazy looks like" video.
0 likesEh it's more like every time there's a new video, I binge watch all of them.
2 likesthe worst part is i’ve already watched them all so now i’m just waiting for the next upload
0 likesThis channel is currently being watched on 3 devices in my house including the main tv. It's an epidemic
0 likesThat’s what happened to me. I’m now on like my 20th video lol o
0 likesYup that's what got me
0 likesYep😅
0 likesExactly what happened to me
0 likesI will stop, I promise =)
0 likesLmao I swear. Running through the whole account
0 likesman thats true as fuck! how d fuk the algorythn works then? are you in usa? coz i am in lithuania, east europe, near russia :D funny shit
0 likesYep
0 likesYes
0 likesfacts, i have gotten easily interested. i wonder if i got recommended this cause of pheonix wright memes ive watched?
0 likesyess
0 likesi watched rhe chris watts one and it was amazing
0 likesNo, I've watched them all too soon after to get them recommended.
0 likesYesssss he need to post more of those!
0 likesSame
0 likesRight 😂
0 likesFacts
0 likesSame haha
0 likesYes and I am okay with this
0 likes@jcmick84 #me too
1 like5000 % true
0 likesAgreed
0 likesYep... that's how I got here
0 likesHahaha so true
0 likesMannn for real 🤣🤣🤣
0 likesThe demon told me to watch every video on this channel.
0 likesYesss lmao
0 likesYes
0 likesFor real
0 likes100% agreed, it has happened to me too....
0 likesThis is to relatable
0 likesFacts 😂💯
0 likesI'm so happy that video has made other JCS videos blow up.. I love all of his videos and he puts a tremendous amount of time and effort into these case evaluations.
0 likesI was wondering how come all these videos were posted years ago but the comments are very recent 😂😩
1 likeTrue
0 likesYep
0 likesI wanna be a detective
0 likesYes!!
0 likesYup, first watched that then I got hooked all the way.
0 likesI’ve been watching non-stop ever since... I’ve never been into criminal physiology but now I can’t stop watching these!
0 likesDefinitivamente
0 likesThat was the first one I saw-
0 likesWord
0 likesyea same for me :D
0 likes@Andrew Jenkins hahaha, exactly! XD
0 likesyes
0 likesExactly that happened to me and I recommended the channel and talked about the content to couple of my friends. I've seen he wasn't uploading regularly, so I don't know what would I do if I watched them all.
0 likesBro fr
0 likesl just subbed at that point
0 likesYou know me too well🤣🤣
0 likesYou’re 100% correct
0 likesYou're right, and I hate it
0 likesI- yes very accurate
0 likesomg yesss
0 likesLiterally 💀
0 likesEXACTLY!!!!! Hahahahaha
0 likesDon't @ me dude
0 likesI confirm and agree with the comment sir
0 likesAffirmative
1 likeI stayed up for hours last night watching a bunch of videos.
0 likesYES 😂😂
0 likesgreat content overall sells this channel not a rehash like so many others.
0 likes@Red Reddington same lol
0 likesYeah, I'm in such a rabbit hole right now, been watching this shit for 2-3 nights now.
0 likesOH MY GOODNESS, YES!!
0 likesThat's exactly what happened!
0 likesAMEN
0 likesjesus christ this is accurate
0 likesLiterally
0 likesThat’s how I got here haha
0 likesyesssssss
0 likesExactly what got me into this channel, I ignored that video for a good few days, finally gave in after a friend sent me the video to "what pretending to be crazy looks like"
0 likesytesl yttuerseee
1 likeWhat's funny is that, that video was the least interesting one because the guy kept saying demons and voices in here (pointing to his head)..
0 likesomg yes
0 likesim doing this instead of studying
Yuh
0 likesyep me and my girlfriend bidged watch this and we didn't know till now...
0 likesdude yea wtf
0 likesThis happened to me but idk like a year ago with Jennifer's Solution. Still the most interesting one imo
0 likes5000%
1 likelmao so true
0 likesYes
0 likesNo way, I was watching this channel for a very long time.
0 likesLol yes!
0 likesthats why im here lol
0 likesSo? We still need to do research for how legal system works before we try to eat the rich.
0 likesyep lmao
0 likesThat's literally exactly what happened to me.
0 likesThat’s EXACTLY how I got here
0 likesAnother video of his got recommended to me before that one
0 likesTrue for me
0 likesWoah
0 likes@Elias Boyle not me haha. I watched a video of his where it talks about a murderous escort who married some guy
0 likesliterally. i’ve watched at least half of the videos on this channel now
0 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesAgreed
0 likesI been watching since his first video
0 likesLol that’s exactly what happened to me
0 likesGlad I'm not alone 🤣
0 likesCan you see me?
0 likesI'm guilty as Chris Watts on that one
0 likesSame
0 likesBwah hahaha! That's exactly what I was thinking.
1 likeIf you watched all these videos in one day, I'm sorry but you have no life wtf 😆😆.. these vida like a hour + long
0 likesI only came across the channel last week and am suddenly obsessed.
0 likesuh oh ive been spotted
0 likesFacts now we're all just down a rabbit whole withbthis channel
0 likesNo
0 likes@Andrew Jenkins o j oj oh. oho. o oh. oh h h. ohh ih hmm
0 likesYes
0 likesHeck yaaa
0 likesWe seam to be on the same path
0 likesWe're really all living the same life huh?
0 likesFor me it was the guilty until proven innocent video. Got that into my recommendations and here we are. Do damn interesting
0 likesno literally imagine the ad $ hes getting rn
0 likesYOOOOO YOU ARE ME
0 likesYep
0 likesSame
0 likesI agree
0 likesme asf
0 likeslmao
0 likesYou're right "What pretending to be crazy looks like" got me too
0 likesaccurate lol
0 likesA hundred percent
0 likesThis channel is genius
0 likesis that why we r all here?😭 that’s why i’m here
0 likesThanks youtube
0 likesSAME
0 likesIVE BEEN WATCHING THIS FOR TWO DAYS BECAUSE OF THAT VID IM ADDICTED
Hahah facts !
0 likesBro, a damn meme pagei follow posted some of his thumbnails
0 likesHow'd you know 🤨
0 likesHOW DID YOU KNOW
0 likes@Hailey Walle I noticed that on every single video of his there are comments from 1 - 2 days ago, so I assumed we all got recommended that first video (because I did) and couldn’t stop there haha
0 likesOMG YEeeeeees
0 likesPretty much
0 likesI literally got that exact video in my feed, and no here I am. No idea where it came from, but hey...
0 likesFAAAAACTS!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesThat exact video was also why I'm here. Been binging this damn channel since this morning lol
0 likesNo, because thats new subscribers such as yourself, being late to the party, thus assuming that everyone must be, and is therefore not late.
0 likesDamn... You right.
0 likesI cam from Jeff
0 likeshaha yes
0 likesWow spot on, you really know how YouTube works
0 likesYup
0 likesI think that's exactly how it happened for me, pretty sure that's the first video I watched
0 likesYup
0 likesMan I'm in a deep rabbit hole the last week I've watched all of jcs vids after this one, going to have to start watching csi
0 likesyup been using this channel as background noise for a week now
1 likeBruh the vid 1 year old and u comment just now and still get 9k likes and 269 comments in 2 days
0 likesI admit I’ve become addicted to these!
0 likesYou are about like 5 milions views late
0 likes@Geno how's your productivity?
0 likesSo many people knew of his channel before, stop being cringe af
0 likes@A B well obviously but there is a reason why there are 2 day old comments on most of his videos, and that’s because everyone is getting recommended his videos now, exactly as I wrote, stop being edgy
0 likesyup
0 likesFacts
0 likesOh 100%, I've been binging these all week
0 likesI know right? JCS’s channel was always doing pretty well, but I came back recently and all the vids have like 10mil views. Pretty crazy.
0 likesYeah yeah sure, algorithms and shit. Just lemme watch the guy try to talk his way outta this shit
0 likesYep
0 likes@Andrew Jenkins This is truth
0 likesYeh
0 likesWoah! How did you know?
0 likes@Yummy Master where did I write I was special for watching his videos ?
0 likesSeems like that video got recommended a lot and then people started watching the rest of the videos.
0 likesDude same algorithm
0 likesExactly
0 likesLmaooooo
0 likesHappened to me. I'm not mad about it LOL
0 likesTotally and fucking yeees! Greetings from Germany :D
0 likesI cannot agree he was pretend to be crazy, I think he was pretending to be smart.
0 likesI like how everybody got recommended “what pretending to be crazy looks like” and now we can’t stop watching this videos 😂
0 likesYUP
0 likes@Samir Dončić Not this video. The guy's channel has a recent video about people who do try to pretend to be crazy and apparently a lot of us had it suggested to us and ended up watching all the channels videos.
0 likes@pmclem02 ahh yea I see it now, I've read first comment slowly this time, I'm drinking alcohol which I don't do very often and felling very dizzy, probably I didn't understand context of comment at first, jesus I made 7 spelling mistakes writing just that first part of comment, autocorrect corrected it :), it's nice to be drunk I can tell you, I understand why people who are sad drink.
1 likei didn't watch that but i wanted to so i went back to find it and found this instead
0 likesOmg lmao
0 likesfor sure
1 likeyes
0 likesLMAOOO so true
0 likesI've been watching him for about a year now
0 likes“Jennifer’s solution” got me originally and “pretending” got me back =) I love this channel!
0 likesWell fuck aleast i dont feel left out
0 likesLITERALLY, I’VE WATCHED SO MANY AFTER GETTING RECOMMENDED THE PRETENDING TO BE CRAZY ONE-
0 likesWow, you're right - now that I think of it.
0 likesYESSSSS DUDE!!!!
0 likesi’m actually in the middle of watching all of his video, this content is so good and really should be on Streaming platforms !
0 likesHahaha so true
0 likesHaha exacly, been binge watching ever since
0 likesMy first video was the chris watts case
0 likesNo, it had just been a long minute since he had uploaded, and the new video got my addiction going again 😅
0 likesI can't stop now 🤚😭
0 likesThis is my last one. What am I supposed to watch now lol?
0 likesDude..... yes.
0 likeslmao yea thats exactlly whats happened to me
0 likesummm wow well yes good prediction
0 likesWe are all the same
0 likesWord
0 likes@Andrew Jenkins yeah I’m the same, had watched them all previously but since that one I’ve gone back and started watching them all again
1 likeYes!
0 likesyes
0 likesYeah LOL
0 likesGuilty
1 like? it's awesome that you found this channel but like no one cares
0 likesPrecisely.
0 likesExactly
0 likesYes and I'm happy it has :)
0 likesCan we agree that I literally see this comment under every video now?
0 likesno. he has 3 million subscribers. people have been following this channel well before that.
0 likesFacts
0 likesEverytime he uploads I do it lol
0 likes@Andrew Jenkins Same. It can be morbid, but people need to see this stuff. It's important to see how the system works and what builds cases.
0 likeswth, you are absolutely correct.
0 likesLet's just say that I know more about police interrogations now than I did before that first video
0 likes"Guilty until proven innocent" got me in
0 likesMm, and you can see it in his social blade
0 likesLMFAO
0 likeslol yes
0 likesOh yeah, welcome to one of the best hidden gems on youtube.
0 likesYes 💯
0 likesyes
0 likesThis is the last video for me to watch before I finish them all
0 likesYYYYYEEEEEESSSSSSS
0 likes@Speedy Mu heeez good job lol
0 likes🤚 yup. I've been binge watching these worse than a Netflix season. I can't help it!
0 likesYeah 😭😭
0 likesyep
0 likesHow did this happen to all of us? Lmao
0 likescan you take a min and stop seeking approval
0 likesBruh thats me rn, I cant stop watching 💀
0 likeshahahaha oh my god yes!
0 likesYes
0 likesWe can also add to that minute that this comments highlighting this are starting to take on their own.
0 likesyup
0 likesYESSIR
0 likesFr look at the views
1 likeNope been watching these for years
0 likesYes and I am her now
0 likestrue :D
1 likeYeah that was the first vid I watched xd
1 likeYUP!!!
1 likeSounds about right
0 likesjup^[
0 likesyeah my first one to watch
0 likesYup
0 likesCan we just take a minute to think why people beg so hard for likes
0 likescant say i mind these are great. I watch them when im feeling shitty about myself..... makes me realize im actually a saint lol
0 likes@Spencer James no there are just shittier people
0 likesThis is a true statement.
0 likesDefinitely how I found myself here. Hope he continues making more.
0 likesYes
0 likesThat’s exactly what happened-
0 likesglad he’s getting a new audience
0 likes@bafooligan I cared
0 likesexactly tho
0 likesnever seen a blow up so fast maybe all gas no brakes
0 likesyes, and now we are all addicted and having problems cuz we have no more vids to watch after finishing all of them
0 likesYou're waiting to be recommended?
0 likesI'm binge-watching this shit newest to oldest.
sameeee
0 likesTrue
0 likesExact same thing here lmao
0 likesdidn’t even need the recommendations 😂
0 likesThey’re good though
0 likesI’ve been here since the Stephen McDaniel case was released but I’ll admit “what pretending to be crazy looks like” definitely jolted me back into watching again after a couple week hiatus
1 likeI’ve been absolutely binging all of these
0 likesI don't agree as I have no idea what you're on about. I already watched a lot of his stuff and was subscribed.
0 likesWelcome to the club, bruv!
0 likes@Andrew Jenkins I’m in the same boat
0 likes@thibault l yup seen that one too
0 likesYou must be new here 😂
1 likei watched that video and immediately started binging criminal psychology videos
0 likes@Water is wet what are you on about?
0 likesIndeed
0 likesAnd now am watching all
0 likesThis case is a bit boring imo
0 likes@DaceLovesTime Look it up chomsky honk. I have been on and about and over it.
0 likes@Water is wet you’re telling me you don’t want JCS to grow as a youtube channel and expand his audience?
0 likes@PackApunchV1 I hope that isn’t the message but I’m not so sure personally I too find it irritating when others adopt something I felt attached to in an obscure personal level. That being said I’m glad that JCS is getting so much more attention on a video “pretending to be crazy” (which I consider not his best work but one of) and hope that it encourages him to narrate more of these videos as more people watch his content
0 likesI'm in this photo
0 likesSo it's not just me! I've been watching them in a random order, and this is one of the last ones. I hope JCS has some more content coming, his better videos are amazing!
0 likesWhy did you say this in such a confusing way
0 likesI’ve been watching this channel for a while. But that video did send me down another rabbit hole of watching the videos I haven’t seen yet.
0 likesLmao it happens with every upload
1 likeya got me!
0 likesLIES!
0 likesLet's take a minute to ponder what we've all learned and that's never talk to the cops ever
0 likesYes, and I don't regret it!
0 likesThe question is why and how did YouTube do this to all of us
0 likeshow did i get here ?!?!?!
0 likesYessss!!! I’ve been watching these videos all day 😭
0 likesI’ve watches this channel since he uploaded the Jennifer investigation video, it’s so good
0 likesmy country is still in quarantine and this syit is interesting so yea.
0 likesSo😳 accurate ... I
0 likesHA! NOOOOB
0 likesYes. So True. I am hooked now.
0 likesThis is precisely what happened
0 likesno i’ve been watching for a while and sleep to these videos, he’s very soothing to listen to
0 likesVery true🤣🤣🤣
0 likesExactly wtf
0 likes100% for me, but i'm pretty glad i found out about the channel, top tier content
0 likesYass
0 likesYea, it's fuckin weird man
0 likesNo
0 likesNah it was the crazy ex video I first watched lol
0 likesFact.
0 likesYou are absolutely right!
0 likesAbsolutely
0 likesNo I watched this channel a year ago.
0 likesNope, not the case for me.
1 like100% that's what happened to me xD
0 likesDo we really need this comment on every single one of his videos. Relax
0 likes💯
0 likesThat video pulled me right in. Subbed immediately.
0 likesBruh this is my 3rd video lol and I’m in the D.R supposed to be relaxing 🤣
0 likesWeirdly yeah although I watched before it was posted
0 likesyep and it was worth it
0 likes100%
0 likesyes
0 likesthe legend of jeff was what got me here
0 likesRightly so.
0 likesGood content
Yes. You are absolutely correct.
0 likesI got recommended the one about Col. Russell Williams a few years ago on my school laptop of all things, and I've just sort of come back to them all every few months.
0 likes100% accurate.
0 likesSo we're getting into personal attacks heh?
0 likesNo, but for real, I’m happy this dude got the recognition that he deserves, amazing content
0 likesYes. Exactly the reason I'm here
0 likesThis literally me. I’m now 4 days deep
0 likesWell, that's me called out.
0 likesI've already binged all of his videos before but that one got me binging them again lol
0 likesYeah you can stop fucking posting this on every single one of his videos now.
0 likesAll hail to the YT algorithm.
0 likesI've been watching these things since he had 3 videos on the channel and I'm really happy to see how much the channel has grown ever since. Insane quality content, very somber and educational.
0 likesThat video is the gateway video.
0 likesI cant believe I'm watching videos like this that are so long.
Yes, and now I'm stuck watching all this criminal psychology and true crimes and I'm like AAAA
0 likesOkay, I'm not alone then!
1 like😂 The algorithm spread that video like a virus. Millions and millions of views on every video of his.
0 likesThis is a fascinating channel. The narrator reminds me of Ron Howard.
0 likesAye.
0 likes100% 🤣
0 likesAbsolutely and now I want more
0 likesTrueeee
0 likesindeed
0 likesso true
0 likesMe too
0 likesAgreed
0 likesExactly
0 likesIt's so true I forgot that that was the one that started it I'm already in 10 hours later.
0 likesToucheeee
0 likesYES !!!!!! I keep going back to the
0 likes“what pretending to be crazy looks like” video
I've been subscribed to this guy since his Chris Watts videos.
0 likesyes.
0 likesabsolutely, these are so interesting
0 likesYes
0 likesHow moment
0 likesFacts
0 likesThis is last video I had left
0 likesLol that's what happened to me
0 likesAbsolutely 😂, and telling everyone I know about them too
0 likesVery good.
0 likesHow about we just thanks notifications for bring this amazing content into my life...don't hate...appreciate.
1 likeexactly
0 likes@Robert Why Robert? WHY?
0 likesYes lmao
0 likesThis comment gets more and more original everytime someone posts it
0 likesabsolutely
0 likesNo I watched that video because I've been watching this chanel for a long time. Like with most videos I watch🤷♂️
0 likesThat’s terrible. Their children don’t get to grow up with a dad, and he collapsed in front of his son, that is terrifying.
2531 likesReplies (80)
Yep, this poor family man
55 likesIt’s sad. I have 4 kids. I could not even imagine dropping in front of them knowing I wouldn’t see them again. I just can’t imagine.
79 likesI completely agree-- but that dude shouldn't have pushed the guy down like that to begin with. Not saying Drejka isn't in the wrong, but still.
95 likes@Dekoto true but to him, all he saw was a man loudly arguing with his wife about something. I've seen a lot of those end up with someone being suckered punched and in the floor bleeding and stunned so I kinda understand why he did that
125 likesPerfect recipe for creating a monster inside some craniums
1 like@Twoozy Uzi yeah, but he could’ve asked what the hell was going on. Aggression shouldn’t be the first step.
51 likes@Some Dude yea but everything is based on personal experience yknow? And we know is Michael's experience of no fights so I have to guess the victim's. Everything is 20/20
4 likes@SpookyActionAtADistance while technically illegal, I think pushing someone down and then back up isn't that bad. Bad sure but nothing you should go to jail for yknow? Like when two drunks get in a fight, illegal sure but if no one is badly beaten, I'm not calling the cops
30 likesMost black kids don’t grow up with a dad, whats new?
20 likesBro he literally got pushed down for nothing and sprained his arm maybe shooting was bad but at that point you can’t blame he if he didn’t shoot what if that guy tackled and shot him
13 likes@Miller Time he was yelling arguing with his wife with his kids near, also the victim didn't have a gun and didn't tackle him so don't bring what if's that changes the whole situation
40 likesMost of their kind don’t.
1 likeAs much as I agree that this was excessive (guy thinks he's some kind of police officer after duty and is clearly a wannabe superhero), you have to say that maybe they shouldn't have parked on a handicapped only spot and maybe the guy should first ask 'hey, what's going on?' instead of attacking him right away?
7 likesI know, right? One of the few times the father is still around and then he gets shot for punching somebody.
1 like@Hugh Mongous Not punching. Pushing. He simply pushed someone being up in his girlfriends face, out of the way. Wich is a rational action, when an aggressive dude is acting threatening towards a woman in the car.
15 likes@Hypogonadism Pushing someone so they fall down on a hard surface is even more dangerous than punching. It is not a rational action, it is assault, it can be deadly and it is inexcusable. If you act like an asshole like the guy who got shot, you sooner or later piss of the wrong people. Shooting him was overkill of course but this aggressive behavior is something that is simply not acceptable as a first resort without any warning.
13 likes@Poker Joker 🤡🤡
7 likesThey were both in the wrong, maybe the man shouldn’t have committed aggravated assault.. maybe they would both still be there.
2 likesHe was clearly teaching his son about how to attack.
0 likesIs it really terrible?? Would it be equally as "terrible" knowing that the kids were being raised by such arrogant, entitled and violent people such as their parents? Do you even consider that option? If you violently push or touch someone then in reality you forfeit your right to life and you should be ready for consequences. You do not know what kind of person you are pushing or punching! If people would keep their hands off of each other then maybe the world would be that much better!
0 likesHe was protecting his family? Yeah right! Lol
3 likesmaybe he shouldn't of assaulted people then?
2 likes@Dekoto It was barely a push. Dude must have the balance of my drunk uncle.
5 likesOn the plus side, the kids are so young that they likely won't remember. I think its kind of noble that the man's last instinct was to run to his kid in the store. I can tell by that act that he's a much better person than this arrogant parking lot cop.
0 likes@knast trast idc any of ur rationalism, the shooter needed cause a scene and it’s an assault in the first place. Get your nuts fixed
1 likeTheir Real Dad is the United States Government; the Taxpayers funding the Welfare Queen.
0 likesDo you think that if he had not immediately assaulted Michael he might still be alive?
0 likes@SpookyActionAtADistance Ah yes, because lightly shoving someone to get them to stop harassing your wife and kids justifies murder.
1 likeI'm starting to think the people in this comment section have a very low value for human life if a pacifying move from someone who was clearly not intending on hurting the dude justifies his death.
@SpookyActionAtADistance Have you never seen the way adults interrupt people when others get into an argument with a loved one? Shoving is a common thing because the person yelling at your wife or child isn't going to listen when you say, "hey stop that". All their attention is directed at the person they are yelling at.
1 like@SpookyActionAtADistance It was a light shove. You can tell by the video. There was very little force behind it. A normal person would be able to balance against it but for some reason this guy fell over.
2 likes@Dekoto The victims also illegally used a handicap space, and got aggressive when called out for it. No one's a winner in this story
3 likes@Some Dude yeah but yk when u see another man full on yelling at ur wife ig u can get scared.
0 likes@SpookyActionAtADistance it's also wrong to argue with strangers trying to provoke something
1 like@Hypogonadism yeah do so if you want to scare ur kids.
0 likes@Miller Time how are you gonna say "what if" about the guy who got shot dead. boo hoo dude got pushed to the ground and hurt his wrist, that will heal. can't bring someone back to life and can't have his family unsee what they saw.
2 likesI think we can sum up this entire comment thread with: PLAY STUPID GAMES WIN STUPID PRIZES
1 like@Nafi n found the racist
0 likes@Hugh Mongousfound another racist
0 likesShouldn't have parked in that handicap spot then eh?
2 likes@Chris Phillips did you not hear that this guy had harrassed other people with a gun in the past including another woman with her kids in the car? did they all push him too?
1 like@kameisha4eva2 I understand that but the past is the past. We are talking about the events that happened in this situation. Are you saying that because he did that in the past that he is no longer allowed to defend himself when the situation arises? I don't know you or what you have done in the past but I would want you to defend yourself if you needed to.
0 likes@Twoozy Uzi No excuse. Drejka did nothing illegal before the push. McG committed assault by pushing = illegal.
1 like@Chris Phillips lol the past is the past. This is something he goes around doing. He does not have any type of authority not to mention he has pulled his gun on others including women and children. They were 100% wrong for parking there. The father had no right to push him either. But you cant ignore the fact that this is a reoccurrence lol he goes around literally looking for this type of shit. Im curious as to what made him pull his gun on the women and children prior...
1 like@Sabrason if the cops do shit, sure lol. But most of the time they won't personal experience
0 likes@kameisha4eva2 haha... wow... none of that matters. He was violently pushed down and had no idea what was coming next. I don't care what he did in the past, it has no bearing on the assault that was inflicted on him in that parking lot. Even if he wished for this situation every day it doesn't matter.
0 likes@Chris Phillips hes in jail...
0 likes@kameisha4eva2 let me ask you this. What if a police officer was thrown on the ground like that, do you think he would be justified in shooting? The answer is yes, yes he would. So why are most people treating this situation differently? Are officers lives worth more than micheals or yours or mine? The answer to that is no!
1 like@Hypogonadism Do you have any idea of how many people die by hitting their head in the concrete?
0 likesDrejka was in the right until before he shoot. This is obvious to everyone who saw the footage and the case was handled correctly. Since the aggressor was clearly stepping back, Drejka had no business to shoot his guns, but he had thousands of reasons to draw it
@Chris Phillips all these what ifs. the man has a pattern of behaviour that led to this moment lol
1 like@Sabrason doesn't matter much to the police, honestly if you call saying you got pushed after an argument, the most they'll do is put it on a record and tell you to stop getting into arguments with strangers
0 likesi got a what if. What if that dude didn’t park in the handicap spot like a jackass in the first place
0 likesHe lost his life for parking like an asshole and attacking a person. Maybe his kids will grow up to not attack people... they might use their words.🤷♂️
0 likes@Nafi n ..l
0 likes@Piero Fasulli Drejka had no business walking up to the car, being a threat towards a woman in the car with her child, screaming and instigating a fight.
0 likesAnd it doesnt matter if the dead man stepped back or not. He could have stepped forwards, screaming at Drejka, and he still would be murdered if Drejka pulled a gun and shot him. American society is truly pathetic.
@Milka What on earth are you on about?
0 likes@Maria Santos Sure. He underestimated how big of a lunatic Drejka was. But he was well within reason to push him out of the way. As Drejka was the aggressor, picking a fight with his wife and kid.
0 likes@Hypogonadism relax man lol
0 likes@Nafi n Uncalled for to bring something like that up when it has nothing to do with this innocent man who died infront of his son. Come on man, at least set aside your hate in moments like these and reserve it for BLM posts or something.
0 likes@Dekoto some random man approached his girlfriend hostile over a parking sticker which was none of his business anyway, he had every right to push him and im sad he did not get to beat his face in
0 likes@Hypogonadism I understand the reason. He was protecting his family. It's a natural reaction. I can see many other men doing the same. However, it's not the best option. The reason why, as you have stated, is you don't know what kind of person you are dealing with. As you can see in Drejka's case, he has a history of creating conflict. Before the shooting, he had drawn his gun on at least 3 people. 2 times during road rage incidents, and one over the very same parking spot. His only means to defend himself is his gun. It is his first resort. And, it is what emboldens him to confront people. This is why pushing the guy is not a wise idea. If you must get physical with him, the correct thing to do would have been to kill him. 10 years sentence for manslaughter, 5 years with good behavior.
0 likes@Some Dude facts....anyone who gets physical gets killed now a days....it's natural to defend yourselves when physically attacked
0 likes@Abel Jacobo You can't shoot someone as revenge over a push. It's not reasonable force.
1 like@Maria Santos One could even argue, that knowing who Drejka is, knowing he had a gun, it was more important to push him away from his family. This was literally an armed lunatic, who picked a fight with his wife and kid, acting aggresive, shouting at them
1 likeI find it incredibly strange, that anyone would try make it out as if the dude who got shot, was the aggressor. Thats my only objection.
@Hypogonadism No. If he stepped forward, threatening etc it would have been attempted assault (which can result in murder) by definition
0 likes@Abel Jacobo so you’re saying a guy deserves to be murdered in front of his wife and kids because he pushed him? I understand a fight breaking out, but shooting a feller?
0 likes@Hypogonadism Knowing Drejka, it is most important not to engage with him. You avoid people like this. But if you choose to engage, you must assume he is armed and act accordingly. Shoot first, then ask questions later. That's how it was when I stayed in Miami.
0 likesAs for people making out Marquise as the aggressor, well, he's was a Black man. Some people here do not like Black people and will villainize them no matter what. It's clear he was defending his family. Drejka is the aggressor.
@Hypogonadism in russia we do it without guns. Nice and simple
0 likes@Luke Callahan Verbally arguing is not illegal or injurious, no matter how dumb or in poor taste it was. That argument is dead in the water.
0 likes@Abel Jacobo You really think a man who defended his wife deserved to die? So you don't think Drejka deserved to be in jail at least? I mean, even before this he was going around intimidating people with his weapon (one of which was a pregnant lady). He is a wannabe cop who goes around bosting with his gun to feel superior, but in reality he's just a coward eager to use his gun for any reason whatsoever.
0 likes@Bullshit Department Shoving and pushing is normal here in Norway aswell. One simply doesnt need a deadly weapon to protect us against a fucking push.
0 likes@SpookyActionAtADistance it doesn’t matter. Michael made the choice to kill a man over a god damn push. He should keep his calm, knowing he’s a gun owner, & de-escalate if he had genuine intention of just getting abled people out of a disabled parking spot.
0 likes@Miller Time “what if”‘s are meaningless in this case Bc a character in this “what if” situation is dead. Michael was a pussy that saw a black man, & personally didn’t know how to fight, so he hit the unarmed victim w the only weapon he had on him. As the term goes “you don’t bring a gun to a knife fight”.
0 likes@Some Dude Aggression was Michael's first step.
0 likes@Nafi n What an ignorant comment. "It's perfectly acceptable that this guy shot and killed someone after he went out of his way to be aggressive.
0 likes@Some Dude why does he feel like it’s his responsibility to patrol a handicapped parking spot in the first place??? If he would’ve minded his own business to begin with he wouldn’t have been pushed down. People need to take accountability for things that they start.
0 likes@Some Dude and what abt all the other instances of his road rage and aggression ??? Drejka already had underlying issues to begin with.
0 likes@Hypogonadism problem in US is the 450 million guns in circulation, the army 3% of that...there's literally nothing they could do to fix that problem unless they completely ban them for 150 years or however long it would take for them to rust...but that is like banning alcohol, it won't work and cause more problems than it solves...in america, anyway. So imo their situation is hopeless.
0 likes@Bullshit Department So true. Australia did something radical. Bought back guns. Wich actually worked for them. But i dont think it will work in America.
0 likes@Hypogonadism These people grow up with so little confrontation that feel they can justify carrying a gun and "defend" themselves in the most cowardly manner.
0 likes@Melissa S never said it was illegal jus said he shoulda been doin it 🤷🏽♂️
0 likesA responsible gun owner dreads the day (if ever) that he has to use it. This guy was looking for an opportunity. Poor child lost his father because of it.
2843 likesReplies (100)
*children 😔😔
135 likesThe threat of the weapon would’ve been sufficient for protection, there was no need for discharge.
185 likes@Boris Johnson definitely. And I can also imagine, if you really feel there is a need for discharge, aiming at someone's chest would probably be your last option, and a warning shot would probably be the most logical next step. So yeah, this guy was out for blood
77 likes@Madenique van Wyk I think this guy was wrong to fire. But all safety courses teach you that you aim for center mass (chest and abdomen) as it's the largest target on a person. Also warning shots only really exist in movies, a warning shot can get you arrested for a negligent discharge. The brandishing of a gun is warning enough. You're taught that you only fire when aimed at a legitimate threat, and ensuring no innocents are in the background.
98 likesThis is the major issue, Drejka was not facing a legitimate threat, he was some idiot who wanted to play badass with a woman trying to mind her business, but when someone his own size appeared, he chose to use lethal force instead of defusing or accepting the fight he started.
It's seems Drejka had training in
howto a gun, but notwhento use a gun. And that is arguably most important.As a gun owner and concealed carrier I know the chances of me ever having to draw my firearm is pretty damn slim, but even if that does happen the chances of me actually firing it is far slimmer. The simple fact of knowing a person is armed is enough to deter most people. Hell even in the video you see Mr McLaughlin immediately back away and recoil at the sight of the gun, but that murderer Mr Drejka was out for blood anyway
55 likesblack dude ain't angel either, he should not have escalated
33 likesI agree, yes the guy assaulted him but he litterly took a a few seconds thinking to shoot him or not and he was definitely itching to kill someone and the victim gave him a reason to do so.
34 likesAND had to see his father collapse in front of him. That has to be a traumatic experience. Rest easy :(
13 likesAs a responsible gun owner myself it sickens me. You should be doing everything possible to diffuse these types of situations. He STARTED a confrontation by starting the argument with her which was the first major problem. After he got shoved and pulled his weapon he knew the dude was no longer a threat and shot anyways hoping he could get away with it. What an asshole.
46 likes@Boris Johnson in some states that’s also illegal, but you are probably right.
1 likeGenuine fear of mine to ever have to shoot someone in a fast paced situation like this
4 likes@Madenique van Wyk he thought about that shot too...
3 likes@Madenique van Wyk warning shots are illegal in alot of states
2 likes@Boris Johnson your not allowed to just pull out your gun in America. You have to use it. It's a catch 22.
0 likes@socks man thanks, I'm not American so I have no idea what the "just carrying firearms around in the street" protocol is, however I do have to say that in the long run, if I had to weigh up shooting an illegal warning shot, and illegally shooting someone in the chest, I'd probably choose the former. Sorry to Drejka but I'm different 😂
5 likes@A N X I E T Y yeah the sad thing is how inevitable this was, dude was a bit trigger happy
7 likesTbf that Father was very irresponsible, you can't just go around and shove any to the ground
2 likes@Superior Intelligence 122 did we both watch the same video, the victim stopped after he pushed the dude. dude could have not shot him and all this shit in the video would have never happened
7 likes@Keovey did I SAY it was a good idea? Are you saying it's a BETTER idea to just straight up shoot a man? Oh yeah you are, you think they're all equally guilty. Shooter started the whole fight, and immediately whipped his gun out and shot in a couple of seconds. Nothing you say can defend that.
4 likes@Keovey there is literally no one I feel pity for in this story except for the kids. The dude is horrible person, the parents were/are horrible people.
2 likesTrue. The guy was itching to finally use the gun that he bought.
2 likesTruth. Very sad.. some people get a CCW and think they are captain dick.
3 likes@IITim2:15yep I'm exactly the same
0 likes@Madenique van Wyk He didn't start the fight?!?! The guy literally came over and shoved the guy to the ground not knowing what's even going on, not a very responsible dad now is it, not a good role model. I feel sorry for no one here apart from the kids
2 likesA responsible gun owner.....? How about u stop letting everyone have guns America is backwards cos they like making money
1 likeI came here to say this. I am 17 and a future gun owner. I don't ever ever ever ever ever want to use a gun to hurt anyone. I hate that the chance that I may have to, is above zero.
1 like@Caleb Barker Even brandishing a weapon in a situation where you wouldn’t be otherwise justified to discharge it is enough to get you charged in many places.
0 likes@Frog in A bucket yes they do, they give you a sense of invulnerability and ultimate power over others. im not gonna argue if guns are bad, but to say there not mind altering is pretty stupid...
0 likes@Ashencloud i can't believe that every person who replies to my warning shot suggestion would gladly defend the guy not making a warning shot, because it's illegal and could lead to an accident, thereby confirming to me that you'd rather shoot someone straight in the chest for pushing you, rather than take your chances with a shot that's not aimed at someone directly. Am i losing my mind? How do these two actions compare? This man went to jail for manslaughter, and you're telling me in no way would there be better consequences if he decided not to aim the bullet at the father's chest???
0 likes@Keovey so you think that a shove like that justifies his murder? Okay then, I'd rather not think that anyone has such skewed morality, but I wasn't planning on visiting a coutry with more open gun laws than open mindsets, so thanks for providing me another excellent reason.
0 likesBoth messed. If the Drieka just walked away and called the police he’d have a very solid case of aggravated assault. Instead he wanted to be a wannabe hero protecting “his store”
0 likes@Keovey you literally agree with Batman that you don't feel bad for anyone except the kids, and told me everyone was in the wrong here. The only way someone wouldn't feel remorse over someone else dying, is that you think they deserve it. Over a shove. "nobody said that so don't make assumptions" no bucko it's called extrapolation based on evidence and you were practically saying EXACTLY that. I just put it into more clear wording so that you can see what you're advocating for, and rightly realise that it's a radical stance. Now go over your previous comments and tell me what exactly you were trying to say then 😂
0 likesHaven’t looked at all the comments, but this comment section so far is 10/10
1 like@Madenique van Wyk No, i thin k if your going to take a man to the ground for no reason you should expect something back, now shooting the man was out of order and I never said he was in the right but that dad caused this situation though! No very responsible as a dad...
0 likes@Keovey okay, you've stated your case. You don't see how, in this man's mind, a random stranger harrassing your family while you're away could justify a confrontation. We don't know anything about the circumstances, and while yes, I agree that a rational person would probably start with something like "Hey! What's going on here?", I still don't see the point of this reasoning. So what if he was in the wrong? Drejka was a million times more in the wrong, and a person ended up dead because of it. I don't see how sprinkling a bit of victim-blaming onto this case, just for the flavour, changes anything about this case or proves anything other than what we know already. People are human, they make mistakes, nobody ever acts 100% justifiable in a situation, which often leads to it worsening. It doesn't at all take away from what Dejka has done, and in fact I hope everyone you love acts coolheaded in every situation, no matter what happens to them. I really hope so.
2 likes@Madenique van Wyk You just wrong though, how is he possibly not to blame also!?!? I fell like your arguing that its only the guy whose shits fault
0 likes@Keovey you're getting a bit unintelligible, so I'm not really sure what to respond to. And as you're also not getting what I'm trying to say, I think we can just end it here then.
1 like@Madenique van Wyk What a charming way to try and end a discussion, your really trying to squirm your way out of this one ay
0 likes@Keovey 😂😂😂😂 oh honey, I could talk to you all day. And seeing as you're so eager to talk back, I'm more than happy to oblige. I just don't know what you want me to say? What exactly is your argument? You turned my "he was in the wrong, but Drejka was more in the wrong, and trying to say that he deserves this in any way sounds like victim-blaming" into "uUHM you're saying that this is not his fault at all?!?" and first off I don't think your line of reasoning is well-supported, and when I point that out to you, you don't have any more of an argument to defend your standpoint, rather you just try and invalidate my argument by reiterating it wrongly. Am I right, or did you actually understand what I'm saying and you're simply choosing to misinterpret it so that you don't have to admit to being biased? And please answer back with something coherent.
0 likes@I do a little trolling I was searching for this comment. It was avoidable from both sides. And the shooter was too unstable to responsibly handle a gun IMHO. - I know my view can be a little bit skewed due to the fact, that I have german opinions where guns are not allowed at all.
1 like@Keovey Stop excusing homicide
2 likes@Eeeertoo Never did.
0 likes@Keovey sure did
1 like@Eeeertoo How so?
0 likes@Sen Li he don't need to escalated by just pushing him without knowing the situation first, if he just ask him why an what happened this should have not happened, every action have consequences, sory for butchering english
0 likes@Mikael B dont talk for me.. not all of the rest of the world agree with u. i want to have the ability to defend myself and my family from harm, people like u think its ur right to stop me from that.. my edc include a knife AND first aid its to handle extreme situations in my everyday life.. if i someday would need my knife for self defence i need it at that time not 20min+ when police maybe come help me.. if i need to use my first aid i need to use it right at that time not 20min+ when the ambulance get there.. but u fine with waiting for someone else to save u... im not.
2 likes@Naka Chinjah
1 likeNobody portrays the victim as an angel. What you do right now is trying to divert the attention from the murderer to the victim. Also known as victim blaming.
@Naka Chinjah
0 likesSaying "black dude" also makes me think that you have a racial bias here.
@Khazrak is he not black, he is black , so that is why i'm calling him black dude. im not trying to offended ya'll i just said he ain't no angel. nothing after that.
0 likes@Keovey What are you gonna do if you see some grown man arguing with your wife probably nothing
0 likesYes this man was definitely enjoying every moment of the altercation. I doubt race had anything to do with it, he just wanted to shoot someone, literally anyone.
1 like@408. Cheytac Evaluate the situation and if it escalates and he best violent I'll sort him out But I won't just shove him to the ground straight away that's called ASSAULT.
1 like@Keovey “im not saying he deserved to be shot BUT dont shove people” shitty excuse for homicide
1 likeSeriously. This guy was clearly looking for confrontation considering he'd been arrested for pulling out his firearm in FOUR previous roadrage incidents. And multiple of those, again, being at women with their kids with them!
2 likes@Madenique van Wyk no, if you're ever in the situation to shoot someone you don't give warning shots, and you shoot for center mass.
1 likeNot saying this was justified, but your statement is completely wrong.
@Keovey
1 likeNot saying the dad should've escalated the situation by shoving him, I think that was wrong. The guy was clearly looking for confrontation though. Violent confrontation apparently, considering his gun swinging history. Feel really bad for the mom and kids. I seriously hope the kids were to young to be aware of the situation.
Period!
0 likesYeh well it seems theres a hell of a lot more "wish someone woulds" than responsible "i hope i never have to" gun owners. In fact its almost embedded into gun culture and advertisements.
1 like@Madenique van Wyk a warning shot could’ve hit someone or something else. You’re trained to hit center mass. I don’t agree with this shooting tho
0 likes@Madenique van Wyk I agree but things happen so fast and anger probably had a huge part of it I say 10 percent of people would of shot him are egos are way 2 much nowadays.
0 likes@Naka Chinjah agree both parties faults mostly the black dude .
0 likesYeah to be honest I'm convinced that 90% of all gun owners fantasize about the day they'll finally get the opportunity to legally murder someone. It's so creepy and weird, and tbh, people like that are not much better than the would be robber or whatever.
0 likes@Madenique van Wyk I dont understand what do you mean, he was tackled to the ground ,he was on fight or flight mode
0 likes@I do a little trolling no mate you dont tackle someone to the ground and expect nothing do happen ,I am not saying that the white dude is innocent but in my eyes he was a mad with a gun on on fight or flight mode that's why you should avoid street fights ,you dont know if the persone that you are fighting is sane or not
0 likes@Madenique van Wyk The issue with warning shots is that the bullet could hit someone else, you've got no idea where that bullet might end up if it ricochets. Sorry you seem to be getting dogpiled for not knowing why warning shots are seen as a bad idea.
1 likeAgreed. The assailant wanted to shoot someone for whatever reason he could find. A gun is something the owner hopes never has to use it other than target practice. The assailant went out that day to see if he could find any possible tiny excuse he could find to shoot someone, anyone. It did not matter who it was. He was going to shoot someone that day.
1 like@Boris Johnson There was likely not even a need to unhoster the weapon. He could have just pointed at it. Micheal is a guy that should have never had a weapon if he was so quick to fire with so little provocation.
1 likeme waiting ffor the day i get to put a niggai nthe grown for trying me: whattt ykw thats very true thank god im responsible
0 likesMany cowards with guns out there. That being said, your best defense is de-escalation and loving your neighbor.
0 likes@Caleb Barker It was a legitimate threat! The guy was violently shoved to the ground, the victim was not justified in any way to do so.
0 likes@Ben Grimm People that want to defend themselves? I would say that's everybody.
0 likes@Madenique van Wyk In real life, there's no such thing as aiming for the leg, or a warning shot. Aiming is surprisingly difficult under the best of circumstances. If your wrist flicks up a millimeter, that's a deadly shot.
0 likesThat's why you never ever ever point a weapon at a person unless you want to kill them. Any responsible firearm owner knows that rule. It's deadly serious. Pointing a weapon at a person unintentionally, even with your finger off the trigger and the weapon unloaded, is called "flagging", and you just don't do that. It's so dangerous. A deadly weapon is just that-deadly.
@___Meph___ I agree with you but I'm annoying so I have to tell you that it's "defuse" not "diffuse". Diffusion is in chemistry. Defuse is in social situations.
0 likes@Mikael B I'm sorry dude, but as a Marine that makes no sense. So, I'm a responsible gun owner now, but in a few years when I leave the military I suddenly become irresponsible?
0 likes@LeRoy Boxley Drejka was harassing his wife for minutes and minutes. He started it.
0 likes@Keovey Micheal was literally yelling at his girlfriend so the boyfriend reacted. Micheal did start the fight.
0 likes@ShinySylvie Your allowed to be annoyed at someone that doesn't justify an assault
0 likes@Naka Chinjah doesn’t justify firing though he was backing away as soon as he saw the firearm
0 likes@Keovey That's not even the argument. You said the boyfriend started the fight which is false statement. Sure, he shouldn't have pushed the man, but the man shouldn't be harassing people.
1 like@Forrest Taylor Still not a reason to blindside someone. Drejka didn't place a hand on anybody.
1 like@LeRoy Boxley true that
0 likes@ShinySylvie it happened to quick. Should never have shoved that guy, would still be alive today.
0 likes@Madenique van Wyk Only one was his!
0 likes@Madenique van Wyk
0 likesNo. No, no, no.
Warning shots are always a bad idea. Illegal, too. You don't warn people with a gun, you shoot people with a gun. Aim center mass so as not to miss and end up striking a bystander. If your goal is not to shoot someone with a gun, you shouldn't be pointing your gun. Guns are a lethal force and are only to be used as such.
It's honestly concerning so many people are agreeing with you.
As someone who doesn’t have a father: it could be worse. They will remember their father as a man who died trying to protect their mother and them. Obviously not trying to downplay, but it’s a good way to remember him
1 likeThat’s what happens when you make a whole nation gun crazy and glorify killing. 🤷🏻♂️
1 like@Slick Astley Gayming but honestly most people aren’t scared when they see a gun because the fact they know most people won’t use it
0 likes@AJ3K killing has always been glorified now days it’s not so wym? When criminals had to fight in the arena for there freedom was having killing glorified
1 likeThis is not an adequate reason to use a gun for sure
0 likes@Nba Prince true. But shooting somebody seems to be very popular with rappers nowadays. I don’t think killing is less glorified today.
0 likesFather should never had laid hands though....keeping it real.
0 likes@Madenique van Wyk No, NEVER DO WARNING SHOTS. When you use a gun you aim to kill, not injure, or warn. Warning shots have more of a chance of harming or killing other individuals rather than the one that you are trying to get away from therefore making you the murder.
0 likes@I do a little trolling Absolutely true. Poor child. But awful parents.
0 likes@AJ3K it is lol back then everyone and there grandparents use to love to watch it which I think I would’ve to imagine watching groups of people fighting to the death in the arena for there freedom omg would be so cool mb I got totally off topic
0 likes@Nba Prince lol what my dude?
1 like@Randy Trashcan ma'am, where are these people who are agreeing with me?? So far I only see 20+ replies about what a bad idea it is. I think, any rational human being would get the idea by now.
0 likes@___Meph___ Correction: he started a confrontation with the guy's girlfriend, then the guy himself attacked our lovely peach of a concealed-carry-case.
0 likes@Mikael B Found the European
0 likes@ShinySylvie 1 saying that you disagree with what someone is doing is not starting a fight.
0 likes2 shoving someone to the ground is starting a fight.
@Madenique van Wyk
0 likesYou seem to be pretty fond of strawman arguments. I never defended Drejka and never will defend him for anything. Your assumption that I would rather shoot someone then take a warning shot is one formed from a place of ignorance and a ridiculous situation. I must ask why you think that those are the only two options?
In the case of concealed or even open carry there is a set of guidelines that everyone ought to follow. First being not to get yourself into incredibly stupid situations. Michael in his genius actively searched for these situations. The second is to simply walk away or otherwise get out of the situation through nonviolent means. Michael skipped this one. Third being If you absolutely must, then draw your weapon. In the vast majority of confrontations involving a gun this is where they end. The gun never even being fired. And the aggressor leaves. This is where the altercation between Michael and Markeis would have ended, had Michael not been so trigger happy and moved on to number four, where he fired his weapon at Markeis. Markeis was backing away at the moment and the situation was almost totally diffused when Michael fired. In this situation even if Michael had not fired his weapon he still would have possibly been charged with brandishing a firearm, once again because he started it all and had the opportunity to walk away. In these guidelines, the fourth one is to shoot at center mass. Not to shoot a warning shot. This is because if a warning shot scares someone off, they certainly would have just been scared off by the sight of the weapon. And if they aren’t scared off by the sight of the weapon, then they have no regard for their life and it is more than safe to assume that they will do anything to get you.
In conclusion, I think you need to stop arguing about things you know little about. You need to learn and research so you don’t make these half assed arguments. Michael Drejka did not follow the guidelines.
1. Don’t get yourself in bad situations.
2. Get out of a bad situation through nonviolent means.
3. If you must, draw your weapon.
4. If the danger of death or serious bodily harm persists. Fire your weapon.
And I realise these guidelines can be flawed, that's why they are guidelines, sometimes you must draw your gun and fire immediately. But as I said earlier the extreme vast majority of confrontations involving a firearm never result in anyone getting shot.
Source:
https://fee.org/articles/guns-prevent-thousands-of-crimes-every-day-research-show/#:~:text=Guns%20prevent%20an%20estimated%202.5,crimes%20are%20prevented%20using%20firearms.
This scares me way more than crazy serial killers: guys who do stupid things with their weapons and think they've got the law behind them.
2476 likesReplies (101)
What scare me more that's people who think it's normal to push an old man on the ground cause he's yelling at you..
35 likes@Marchkofeeling that scares you more than someone who killed a man in front of his child???
156 likes@tiffany heart that's your right to think that as that's my right to think different cause we live in a free world, i don't want you to think same as me i'm not a fascist.
0 likes@Marchkofeeling no i get it everyone has opinions! i just feel bad that someone died over something so trivial. have a good night!
22 likes@tiffany heart I'm from Belgium and it's 9AM but thank you and wish you the same for you sweet heart
2 likes@Marchkofeeling Historically very few white people have been killed for their race by black people, when compared to the reverse
24 likes@Alex Glick I'm not sure what the connection is? I'm just saying that if he hadn't been aggressive towards this man twice his age and attacked him unjustifiably out of surprise he wouldn't have died like an idiot in front of his family.
8 likes@Marchkofeeling pushing does not justify killing, it was unnecessary to push him but the guy with the gun was definitely way worse, I don't see how he could be justified
32 likes@Jim Havelaar I agree and I'm not saying that, I'm just saying that he is the initiator of the first assault and unlucky he ran into an unstable ... if he had jumped in his car and left he would be safe but he preferred to be the author of violence.
5 likes@Cylox5 what happens did he get a sentence
0 likes@Marchkofeeling you're supposed to meet force with the same amount of force if you want to prevent yourself from looking like the aggressor vs the defender. Shooting a man taking steps back not moving his hands is uncalled for as much as him shoving him to begin with. Both in the wrong
15 likes@Armando Pacheco-Soto that's why i call him "unstable" and that's why he get 20 years.
3 likesI was in town a week ago and during rush hour and heard what I was convinced was gunshots and quite a lot of them and I was in a lane I couldn't get put of and do carry a pistol with me often, and was sure I was going to have to engage and come to find, its some moron in a sports car of some sort with am exhaust that sounds like gun shots.
0 likes@Alex Glick biggest death tally is war, perpetuated by globalist bankers and neo cons.
4 likesyou just described white people
6 likesWhy? Do you go attacking people from behind?
1 likeDon't push anyone and you'll be safe..
2 likes@tiffany heart Being physically assaulted is NOT trivial.
4 likesWell I guess don’t assault random because you don’t like what their saying lol you might get shot in the chest but feel free to take your chances, we might get more videos like this.
1 like@Marchkofeeling I would rather even go as far as risking a beating in a public area than waste however many years of life the person doing so lived, alongside of potentially destroying the lives of all those around them. Why cause all that undo suffering, just because I can't take a punch? Last I checked assault is not punishable with the death penalty, so why should someone in the situation have the right to issue it. Especially in a situation like the one depicted where they are in a public location and the guy didn't seem to do anything further besides pushing him.
8 likes@Catsquidcat Overlord One punch is often enough to kill someone, especially from behind by surprise BUT to respond you i've said he (shooter) is an unstable and i've never said he (deadman) deserve to die BUT he initiated the assault so he's up to that.
2 likesBecause America's Law enforces such behaviour. And Donald made it even worse.
1 likeGotta wait and see, if Joe can lead towards the first steps of a "solution" to prevent it.
@Atom Teuoxtonion i’m just telling the truth
1 likeso you can put your hands on someone and get away with it? I guess dude didn't get away with it though , he is dead. Should have kept his hands to himself, tough guy is gone!
1 like@GarxGar it’s actually called harassment, not complaining. 🤷♂️ Good thing you weren’t on the jury, you’d probably have been disqualified for bias and psychopathy
1 like@Marchkofeeling you don't see a difference between pushing someone, and murdering someone?
8 likes@GarxGar you dont get to murder someone -- EVEN IF THEY PUSH YOU!!🤯
8 likes@Marchkofeeling so , how was it not 'self defense' for the guy to push him? Maybe they 'feared for their life", cuz HE started it. Right?
1 like@Leland Bourdages Use your brain just for one time, if he didn't push him down from behind the shooter do not open fire at him self defense have nothing to do with that.
3 likesHe got what he deserved. Maybe the next aggressor will think twice about assaulting a man twice his age over a parking space they were parked illegally in in the first place.
3 likes@StacheOperator Ah yes, he absolutely deserved the death penalty for that, thank god we had this hero on site to deliver justice so quickly
7 likes:|
@Marchkofeeling that's not an old man
7 likes@Marchkofeeling wow so you wouldnt defend your wife and kids from some crazy guy at a gas station?
5 likes@Borfis Jort maybe the guy should mind his business and not harass women and children
7 likes@Marchkofeeling no ur wrong. the shooter was the one to initiate three confrontation
4 likes@Borfis Jort i didnt say that i meant that the whole situtation was over a parking spot. the whole world is a mess i just wish people would stop hurting eachother
1 like@tiffany heart don't argue with them. These people have been radicalized by gun manufacturer and NRA for a very long time. They have normalized the idea of taking away lives over minor things. Like the narrator says: "appeal to extreme". Their world view of themselves is that dangerous minorities are everywhere and they must remain hyper-vigilant, as if they are now in a doomsday.
7 likesIk it was dumb and he shouldn't have pulled a gun on that man, but he was threatened. It turned from a argument, to being shoved to the ground. At that point i agree with him shooting the other guy.
0 likes@Juan And latinos.
0 likes@Kozak isgod Not really. If someone pushed you from behind would you feel threatened. Yes you would, it would activate your fight or flight. Do I think he should've pulled his gun? Yes. Do I think he should've shot him? NO! But you're not a coward for feeling threatened or wanting to defend yourself.
2 likesY’all have a screw loose if this scares you more than serial killers.
0 likes@SticksForChicks I'd say it is scarier only in the sense that the chances of you getting murdered by a serial killer are slim compared to the chances that some stupid vigilante with a gun and a chip on his shoulder will shoot you for running a stop sign.
6 likes@GarxGar Old dude? Ok. Presenting the weapon was good enough. He decided to shoot. Rot in jail :)
5 likesHow can that, realistically scare you more than a serial killer?
1 like@Elle Did you not see the attackers posture before he saw the gun. He was going after an old man on the ground so in terms of stand your ground he had every right to protect it.
3 likesAs for harassing the couple. He just asked them to move from the handicapped parking spot as it is illegal and they didn't have the sticker.
If a man gets to mad you just simply asked his wife to move out if the handicap spot and attack an old man, I stick by what he said. He deserved it.
@tiffany heart I've taking a few talibans life's during my few tours. I sleep like a baby.
2 likesI also would sleep just fine if someone broke I to my house with my wife and kid and I terminated the threat.l which would definitely happen because I sleep with an AR pistol, specifically a MK18 mod 1 with a suppressor (yes its registered and legal with the ATF) by my bed, wifes keep her glock 43 and I never travel without my glock 23 chambered in .40 with a + 5 baseplate.
That's just my defensive guns. That's not even my safe lol.
@StacheOperator thats you, and i totally understand, but i personally couldnt do that without living my life with guilt
0 likes@tiffany heart some people aren't meant for it. I do want to speak on the case though. The guy backed up once he saw the gun and me personally wouldn't have shot, just retreated to a defensive position to my vehicle and called the cops since the threat seemed to be over.
1 like@B they were bot handicapped lol they were parked illegally. Remember feelings do not equal facts
0 likesI think it's more of a lesson that you shouldn't put your hands on people.
0 likestbh citizens should never have been allowed weapons. and now that people have weapons it is gonna be almost impossible to ban weapons
3 likes@Sooraj The majority of crime is done in places where guns are almost impossible to get and bought illegally and done by a certain minority lol
2 likesCome. And. Take. Them.
@Alex Glick have you done any research? You are 10x more likely to be killed as a white man feom the opposite race. Good God just go to government domains and you'll get all the real info you need. Again, feelings do not equal facts.
2 likes@GarxGar I wasn't aware that old men were a good basis for issuing death penalties.
0 likes@StacheOperator We got a certified badass over here. Your country still has a much higher crime rate than comparable first-world countries. I wonder why 🤔
5 likes@Shannon Hanley Here's another one from the same website. The crime index of the USA is 47.7. The crime index of comparable first-world countries are as follows; Canada: 40.64, Australia: 41.61, New Zealand: 42.19, UK: 44.54, France: 47.37, Germany: 35.14, South Korea: 27.33, Japan: 21.67.
0 likeshttps://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/crime-rate-by-country
@Xero Exactly. Even if we're only going by the enthnocentric "first-world" data moniker, and if we're going for comparable in terms of population/city distribution, then Sweden, France, Ireland, Belgium, Palestine, UK, Italy, and India are all within three points of the US. I really don't believe most people would consider that "much higher."
0 likes@Shannon Hanley Are Palestine and India really comparable countries to the US? You still skipped Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada, Japan, Germany etc.
0 likes@Shannon Hanley And if we look at homicide rate, the States hits 4.96, while France is 1.2.
0 likes@Xero India more so than New Zealand, a tiny, isolated, sparsely-populated island? Yes. I'd say so. Anyway, the reason I chose those countries and "skipped" others was simply to address your statement that US has a much higher crime rate than comparable first-world countries. By which, I'd assume you meant all comparable first-world counties. Which is patently untrue.
0 likes@Marchkofeeling Old man? lol. He was 48.
0 likes@Blakes Vidgamagame Diaries Almost 50 is not young he could be the grandfather of a teenager..
0 likes@GarxGar Firstly, Drejka was 47 at this time. Far from an "old dude." Plus he doesn't even have grey hair or anything else in the video that would make him look old at a glance. So I don't know where you got the impression that he was just some frail old guy, shouting at the clouds and could not have been perceived as a threat to anyone.
4 likesJust as you justify Drejka shooting based on feeling threatened by an "aggressive macho dickhead", consider that the man who was shot was in the store during the argument. He, just like the rest of the customers, didn't know that it was "just about parking." When he goes outside & sees that the male & female voice arguing is his wife and a man who has come near her car, where their children are sitting? By your own logic, he likely felt that he needed to defend his family. So he pushed the guy (clearly not a tackle, as shown on video). Apply your analysis consistently. What should the victim have done to defend his wife & kids against an overly-aggressive man who has just approached their car?
Edit: I just realized he even says his age in this video! He was actually 48 (1 year off from what wikipedia said). Not an "old man." People don't crumble into dust after age 30, you know. Also, Drejka had 4 previous cases of pulling guns on people in road incidents, 2 of which were women? And you call the guy he killed an "aggressive macho dickhead"? Either you are didn't watch the video, or you are so blinded by bias that you really shouldn't even be commenting.
@Marchkofeeling Drejka was 47. He was not an old man and he doesn't even look like one. He has perfectly brown hair & no saggy skin or anything. The only thing that might look old about him is his posture. But he was not old & other than being a bit hunched, he doesn't look old either.
1 likeHe also wasn't yelling at the person who pushed him, he was yelling at the wife of that guy. Imagine walking out of the store & seeing that some random man has approached your car where your kids are sitting and is arguing with your wife? Maybe he thought that his wife was in danger & made a snap choice?
@jarry Dee Oh, you people are so blatantly biased. If you came out of a store & saw that some random man had approached your car with your children in it and was arguing with your wife... how would you react?
1 likeThat's not about being a "tough guy." Just like you can claim that Drejka had to respond to someone being a "tough guy", so did McGlockton. You don't get to play cop-wannabe and expect people to treat you the same as someone with actual authority.
And no, you can't physically attack someone and get away with it. That's what the legal system is for. If you were assaulted, then get the person arrested. A gun is not a tool of retribution or justice. That's the problem with these types. A gun is a last resort. That man knew that his life wasn't in danger, as he clearly showed in his interrogation.
@jarry Dee …shooter should have gone about minding his own business that day. In the eyes of the law and his peers, he got 20 years for pulling and a gun for being “pushed”. In his own words he had never had a physical fight but willingly use a gun and take the life of another in place of his fists - gutless!
1 like@Marchkofeeling … correction…. The shooter is not an old man!!
0 likes@StacheOperator Glad someone is not blind and see the same as me 👍
0 likes@StacheOperator The shooter is in prison. I’d say he got what he deserved.
0 likes@Tavat i'm not racist fact are fact and not telling the truth about some people just because they aren't white is the true racism and made by you what about farmer advantage if they are black? what about the mayor of New York not wanting to meet white journalists? all years long since b.lm bullshit etc etc etc your progressive and globalist way of thinking is the new fascism. and let me tell you by advance this post will be deleted soon cause it's telling the truth and i live in a free world if i want to speak i speak, period (5 posts deleted before)
0 likes@Xero Minorities lol that's why
0 likes@Marchkofeeling 48 years old to be accurate
0 likes@GarxGar Getting pushed over doesn't justify shooting and killing. That's insane. The 'old dude' was in his 30's.
0 likes@GarxGar if the old dude had any sense he wouldn't place himself into this situation. did you miss the part of the video where he was accused of threatening other drivers with his gun? he was the instigator and he only did it because he was packing. i have no sympathy for him
1 likeYes illegally park somewhere then your boyfriend illegally attacks him. He shouldn't of shot but def should of pulled out gun or the black dude would of killed him
2 likes@maximumviper I gave $1,000 to Kyle Rittenhouse defense :)
2 likes@GarxGar very very irrational thinking. Please dont carry a weapon for the safety of everyone.
0 likes@First Time Long Time Absolutely no evidence that the perpetrator would've been killed. That's nonsense.
0 likes@Cylox5 gee I wonder who does that. It must just be gun enthusiast white men and no other demographic whatsoever.
0 likes@Tavat actually i've said "Globalism is the new fascism" disguise the thought and distort the words without being able to capture the nuances and at the same time to call me an idiot, thank you for this nice piece of laughter.
0 likes@Reborn 777 @Reborn 777
2 likesInterracial Violent Crime 2018:
B on W: 547,948
W on B: 59,778
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization Survey
And just this year alone in Chicago B on B shot and wounded is so far at 1,371 with 281 shot and murdered lol
Cope.
@Baby Snake Have you made my sandwich, yet?
1 likewell obviously it does since 99.8 % of victims die to such cases and not serial killers lol.
0 likesBut just imagine having gun laws, no one dies to stupid people :O Glad to not have this problem here were worst case scenario is a pocket knife.
@Son Scarra don't forget your acid attacks
0 likes@Son Scarra also don't forget your mass immigration policy that brings no go zones
0 likesYeah definitely not as scary as serial killers
0 likes100%, you understand the serial killer's purpose, and understand who they are immediately. It's the one's that are outlandish and irrational with a deadly weapon that are worse, it could be LITERALLY anyone
1 like@Marchkofeeling That "old guy" was yelling at his wife. So no, no one would expect him to ignore that and "just drive." Maybe if someone is yelling at your loved ones you just walk away but that's not what others would do as well. Calling him stupid because he acted on someone he thought was a threat to his wife is really weird tbh
0 likes@Marchkofeeling so everyone who initiates an assault is "up to being killed"? I feel sorry for your children and relatives. Smh
0 likes@Cylox5 ^
0 likes@tiffany heart yes obviously. The guy isn’t gonna shoot you if you did nothing.If you aren’t a savage and keep your hands to yourself you don’t got much to worry about😂. But again I don’t condone what he did, but the other dude was in the wrong too
0 likesThere was a case in my country where a young man used a "boga", it's like a gun but it only make noise and usually used during New Year, and a cop and his daughter walk up to them. They argued and the cop decided that he will take the young man to prison. The young man's mom which is very old then cling to his son and started to defend her child by trying to reason with the cop. The cop's daughter brags to the woman that her dad is a policeman as if to tell that her dad has the right to take the young man so the woman should just let go. Obviously, the woman just held her son and said she doesn't care about the cop's status. The cop cursed at the woman and screamed "Do you want me to finish you off right now?!" with that he took a shot to the woman then to the son. The two dropped and the people around them that was unable to help cried and begged the cop to stop. What's horrid is that the cop and his daughter doesn't seem affected by what just happened, they walked away as if nothing happened. It was all caught on camera and a lot of people just witnessed a murder in cold blood. I wouldn't even want to think about if he killed people before catching him in action, he has no remorse that it may be possible. "Boga" may have been banned because it had a lot of self-injury cases but that issue was completely thrown as the cop clearly just wanted to show off his position and that he has a gun.
1 like@The Boyfriend Of Your Wife Okay.
0 likes@Kozak isgod "people that aren't fucking frail push a lot". Act like an animal, get treated like one.
0 likes@Will Maud No, if you've been in a heated conversation before you'd know they walked up and pushed each other. That's fine tho I don't believe you have that much outside experience.
2 likes@Mikoto Suoh Remind me, if Trump's America was so bad for black people, why did police shootings against unarmed black men go down every single year he was in office? Why is black on white crime up?
0 likes@Cole Marshall Do you have any stats for that? With how many people get murdered by serial killers versus to how many people are killed by people like that?
0 likesAnd as you said, a physical attack initiated it. He didn't just say the wrong thing to the wrong person. Are there people who will kill you just because you said the wrong thing? Sure, but again, they're rare just like serial killers.
And serial killers are rare but one serial killer could kill a bunch of people since he's trying not to get caught, whereas an idiot like that will probably get caught and put behind bars after his first and only murder since he will do it in front of everyone at the heat of the moment without having pre-planned the hell out of it first.
@Jack Walters No, I have no stats. But I also have no need to defend my opinions to a stranger. ✌🏻🙂
0 likes@Cole Marshall OK?
0 likes@tiffany heart He wasn't saying any of that at all. I wouldn't bring race into it for no reason. He's saying that it's wrong to come out of nowhere and push someone like the victim did. Yeah; the victim didn't deserve to die for it- but the victim definitely escalated things by choosing to push him rather than telling him to leave or just move his car(because they WERE parked in the wrong spot).
0 likesMicheal had been in several altercations before. Not just against people of colour. He was waiting for an excuse to use his weapon; and he thought the push justified it. Doesn't make it right, but the victim was acting inappropriately too.
You can clearly see in the footage that came up cockily(hands on hips), pushed him, and then seemed to go in for more; only backing up when the gun came out.
You can also CLEARLY see the bystander at the door(who witnessed the push) going in to stop the victim before the Assailant pulled the gun.
If not for Michael shooting his gun; the one that would've gotten arrested would've been the victim; Markeis.
he was right to pull it he got blindsided but he shoulda kept his finger off the trigger long enough to realize the dude was turning away not stepping toward him
0 likesI'm a legal concealed carrier, & this guy & guys with his attitude (people who feel like they need to confront others & enforce the law while not carrying a badge) should NOT be carrying a weapon. Of any kind. He was either taught poorly by his instructor, or misunderstood what personal defense is. My instructor put it this way: when you're carrying, you need to be Zen. Nothing bothers you. You avoid confrontation, you don't SEEK it out like this guy did. You don't get into little pissing contests or ego fights, you don't even flip some D-bag the bird after he cuts you off on the freeway. You need to apologize, you need to de-escalate. You need to do everything in your power to NOT draw your weapon. It's a huge responsibility. That being said, don't ever talk to cops without a lawyer.
1354 likesReplies (45)
Yeah Philip I can appreciate that. The definitely seems like the correct behaviour you should follow when legally carrying a weapon. I just find it hard to believe that a large majority of gun owners are even capable of such a mindset and behaviour.
69 likesYou I trust with this kind of thing. It's just the majority of people I don't.
@Philip Maras: You make too much sense. Thank you for being rational.
27 likesMost rational, constructive, helpful comment ever.
34 likesWell your perfect world isn't what happens
8 likesIf everyone spoke to police only with lawyers, this channel wouldn't exist LOL
14 likesI carried too, I got into a scuffle with a guy and I never drew my XD 40, I felt no need to un holster it, the guy was at Walmart and he started beating his wife like she was a man, no one wanted to step, just record it, I stepped in and he got physical with me, I may have been carrying but I can fight too, I probably would've got my ass kicked but I realized this guy can't fight, he just knows how to hit women, blah blah blah i put him down and cops seen the surveillance and took him to jail like the loser he is!. Some carriers are bullies and just look for trouble and try to be dominant like this guy in the vid, pppffftttt pathetic! R.I.P to the man.
26 likesI was just watching Cart Narcs and one dude announced he had a concealed carry and could pull it, all because he was asked to return his cart at the supermarket. He needs to read this message
5 likesgood gun owner! we need more like u
0 likesThe problem being that there is no onus on other gun owners to seek the training you have.
1 likeIts called power trippin
2 likesAnd that is why you can't give everyone blanket permission to carry a weapon. You'll never know how a gun carrier will behave in any situation, especially a stressful one.
6 likesI agree WHOLEHEARTEDLY! I was taught how to use my fire arm from a cop and the one thing I learned is exactly what you said. But you learn all that stuff in martial arts as well. I am also trained in muay thai, but I dont go looking for a fight I avoid them. you have to be calm to assess the situation before you use it of any force that can cause harm, Cause if you use it it's something you cannot take back.
3 likesNobody should carry a gun.
1 likeFragile egos and fire arms don’t mix
9 likesF
0 likesHeck, any self defense teacher worth his salt should teach that lesson. I learned that in hand to hand. Avoid the confrontation. And when it rises, talk it back down. There is valor found even in fleeing...
2 likesAnd the biggest lesson he taught me was to do as little damage as I can when physical altercation arises. Aim not for the head, when you can knock out a leg.
I got my conceal carry just by filling out an application. No classes or anything, I think this should probly be harder to get 😬
3 likesI am also a responsible gun owner and behave accordingly. Often people’s egos, cause them to be confrontational. Someone who flips the bird in traffic or loses control by screaming and shouting is someone I avoid. Being taught to immediately recognize all possible conclusions, I avoid putting myself in precarious positions. Although I am willing to defend my life, I avoid these situations. Someone willing to argue over a parking spot is looking for a fight that I won’t give them.
0 likes"He was either taught poorly by his instructor,"
0 likes*No* instructor would ever think that this guy's actions were justified. Normally, CCW instructors are so paranoid for getting sued that they will basically tell you never to shoot someone in self-defense. I shit you not, in my first CCW class a female asked if it was OK to shoot a man about to rape her. He told her that she would have to wait until he was actually in the act of penetrating her before she could shoot.
@Jacob Thompson wtf really? But I wonder what is the correct answer tho
0 likes@Simple Human, Complex Ambitions. That sheriff actually was going to let him get away with it!!
1 like@Xanthia Fantom That person doesn't have a fragile ego! He thought and probably still thinks that he stands way above anyone that isn't white and can kill them just like that.
1 like@J b oh come on man
0 likes@Daniel Hristov or, or, and hear me out, mace/pepper spray, or a Tazer. Non-lethal deterrants that are just as effective at stopping a threat as a gun would be.
0 likesYeah some people aren't affected by tazers or mace, but same goes for bullets. If someone's insane enough, they'll take shots and keep attacking. At which point you need to improvize. Guns are just unnecessary, and having mace or a tazer instead would save many lives.
Guns are stupid, and that's just a fact. Only people who should be armed at all are law enforcement and the military.
@Domen Kalan 😭I’m wrong?
0 likesI wish that every pro-gun person was more like you, a logically thinking human being
1 likeJust don't carry guns.
0 likesMy guess would be that carrying a gun in public means they CANT WAIT to pull it out or brandish it in some manner. I bet 90% of the conceal/carry guys are basically thinking "I wish a mfer WOULD".
0 likesThen maybe we should do something at a higher level to encourage people not to take up a handicap parking space when they don't need it - by the time the police were notified, they'd have been gone and then no one would even fucking care, except maybe a handicapped person who needed that spot in the meantime ...
0 likes@TazzyTheDerg ALL firearm laws are infringements and everyone should carry a firearm.
0 likes@William L. a11a11
0 likes@Here lies Kitty Thomas either that, or nobody carries one and everyone uses mace instead
0 likes@TazzyTheDerg there are many people in the police and military that are wholly unprepared to carry a gun. Also, a mace or a taser are perfectly fine option in many cases, but in one vs. many situation they can cost you your life by escalating the situation without serving as a sufficient deterrent. Guns are useful but the gun control and the requirement for qualities of the carrier should be much more strict than they are otherwise their benefit is vastly overweighed by the harm they will cause.
0 likes@Daniel Hristov or just don't have guns, simple fix.
0 likes@TazzyTheDerg I would have to disagree I think every state and every place should test someone's mental state and of they're able to keep a level head in these situations. People have the right to defend and protect themselves in extreme circumstances yes we should have more control on who has a gun cause not everyone should own one. But yeah we should have the right to project ourselves
0 likes@TazzyTheDerg but like you said they aren't always effective and most likely won't be intimidating enough to scare them, especially big people.
0 likespsh, you may have even insinuated controlling who has guns, so shove it and move on 😂 this is America, this is the American Dream he’s living. What a fantastic country.
0 likes100% agree. He pulled out his gun for something that could have been solved just by walking away. Guns and open carry are supposed to be used for emergency situations where all other options are being exhausted and the other person is within a hair's breath of doing something awful to you.
0 likes@Sibs same with guns (if you even read that far into my comment)
0 likesIn which case you have to improvise or defend yourself
Thank you for being a responsible gun owner Philip...
0 likes@Zap Rowsdower 🤝
0 likesAnd yet, so many of these people DO carry.
0 likesHe probably only got the permit and weapon to be able to “defend himself”
0 likes@BigMac you like cupcakes?
0 likesCase closed "hands" are lethal weapons.
0 likesThe woman’s face when the defense attorney said “this man is was the true victim” fully encapsulated my reaction to this whole video. The audacity of this man is ridiculous
2492 likesReplies (45)
This guy is the definition of why people think lawyers are scumbags
152 likes@Dajinn he has a job to do. morality has no place in court unfortunately
97 likes44:30 the face
42 likes@Densified it's really horrible. it fills me with rage when they defame the murder victims in their death just to defend the literal murderers
74 likesshould see the black lady on the left. She rolled her eyes so hard she became part of the exorcist.
50 likes@Dajinn lol
2 likes@rsbandbj1 Too funny. 🙄
2 likes@Dajinn very true
0 likesWell in a sense, he was the one who initially got attacked. Just because you’re arguing with someone doesn’t mean you get to attack them. So up until he pulled the gun and shot someone who clearly yielded to him, he was the victim.
17 likes@Michael dude. He isn't defending the shooter. He's explaining an angle that the defense attorney was suggesting.
6 likes@Michael he didn't escalate the fight. The black man did it by aggressively pushing him to the ground, potentially making him hit his head on the ground.
10 likesHim pulling out his gun was to a degree justified, but everything after that showed that he is just a guilty murderer.
The right thing to do would be to not immediatly kill a man like a dumbass, but to go away and report the assault to the authorities
The black guy was also wrong. Without even enquiring for a second about what's happening, he just push the man to the ground within one second just because the man was arguing with his wife. If he didn't pull out his gun, who knows what's gonna happen next. The audacity of this comment just so you don't look racist is more baffling.
11 likes@Miriam Bamford i never said he was right? But there was no need for him to be shot. “Commenting this as to not seem racist” no im just baffled that the attorney would say this, chill out
5 likes@Jack Eternus
2 likesI've seen attorneys justify their job by saying "Its better to let 10 criminals free than imprison a civilian"I'm not familiar with the trial you referenced (Jodi Arias), and while I don't like attorneys twisting the truth like that, I do agree with this quote, 1000 percent. The actual quote is “It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.” I think the quote is more meant to highlight flaws with the justice system with regard to how much of an injustice it is that anyone should ever be wrongly incarcerated, rather than to let criminals off the hook.
@CallDwn theSky So bro, you’re saying that if you saw someone screaming at your wife you wouldn’t go to defend her? I sure as shit would.
11 likes@Alexander Bell
10 likesDude, calm down. You can deal with someone talking to your wife without putting your hands on them.
@Flzrian same with rape victims. one of the reasons I never came forward legally was I didn’t think I could mentally handle a lawyer trying to defame my character
1 like@Michael mike deserves to be in prison. But the dude assaulted him rather than conduct verbal argument first to resolve the matter. Mike and the woman had ample space and inside a vehicle so the man pushed Mike out of pure over reaction. Woman could have also just moved the car since the lot was empty but then we can justify a handicapped person could park next to them, but she could also just move the vehicle, should mike keep making an issue, dial 911. Out of personally dealing with folks who think their made up neighborhood watch is a federal funded regime, I rather just keep space, speak out my discomfort and for them to cease the issue, and if it doesn’t occur I call the police and make sure I’m recording the freak out, Mike’s biggest issue is he really wanted to live out his fantasy and you see it though his interrogation he’s happy to retell the moments
0 likes@Dankey Kang Yep, your right. The victim shouldn't have pushed him like that. He should've remained calm and figured out what was the deal. You can't get violent and assault someone for no good, i.e., legal reason, especially when you have a family with you. The only time anyone should put their hands on someone, let alone get violent, is when there is a real and immediate danger. It's the same with this guy because it was clear to him and everyone else that he was in no immediate danger. Just really disappointing, and bad decisions were made by all involved.
0 likesIts his job so .. yea
0 likes@Miriam Bamford did you even watch the video? He could've easily pulled out his gun and the guy who pushed him wouldn't have kept going. The video shows that very clearly.
3 likesWell who tf do you think you are to park in a handicap spot without being handicapped and then assault another person that points IT out?
2 likesMost people would have done the same. Most people that want to live in a civilized country at least. Of course pulling out the gun was the big error from the other guy. But both did their part to get to this outcome that nobody wanted.
@Azure D Yea but only one ended up dead💀
2 likes@Densified it is the courts responsibility to uphold the truth and enact justice. So morality has everything to do with the court
0 likes@Dajinn dude he is just doing his job why the hate? I feel bad for lawyers everyone has a negative opinion on them but it's their freaking job man
1 like@The Great Pumpkin and u get get pushed to the ground without shooting someone through the heart!!! If he had pulled the gun… COOL! We all agree. If mclogton had advanced at that point, COOL! but he didn’t!!! I don’t think dreka is a DUNN level racist idiot, but, he is a fake military/police guy, and, as a combat veteran(Iraq) u can’t understand how much guys like that gross me out. Vets don’t deserve any more respect that any person… but, a guy like this clearly thinks we do… guess what… he shoulda joined in that case. They were literally giving away multiple thousands of dollars as a signing bonus… to sign up. The army(which I joined) and the marines were desperately short of volunteers in 2003/04. Why didn’t he just sign up?
0 likesdefense attorneys are emotional enablers
1 likeI’m not defending Drejka but Will not defend his victim, because he should keep his hands to himself. Especially when you are much younger and stronger. You don’t know if the other guy have a weapon. Hurting man’s pride can result in death. In Chicago people die over words every day.
1 like@Mr Bonjangle ohhhh nooooo grown man got pushed to the ground what will he ever do now:(((((((((((((
0 likes@Dankey Kang Drejka instigated and escalated the whole issue... He was screaming at a woman but the second he was confronted by a man he had to pull a gun out.
1 likei i got got
0 likes@Azure D I promise you, most people would simply mind their own business.
1 like@The Great Pumpkin "You can deal with someone talking to your wife without putting your hands on them."
2 likesHe wasn't "talking" to her. He was yelling and swearing at her. To the point where other customers, both coming OUT of the store and going in ALL stopped to watch and listen. If he had been speaking in a calm, polite manner I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have paid the least bit of attention. And he didn't need to touch the car. He had her trapped by standing blocking the door and he was speaking in a threatening manner which is part of the reason why he was convicted. Because he instigated the entire incident. He is NOT the parking lot police. It's not his property so he had no right to walk over and say ANYTHING. In doing so he became the aggressor.
@Marvin Salmeron "Mike’s biggest issue is he really wanted to live out his fantasy and you see it though his interrogation he’s happy to retell the moments"
1 likeThis is a key element of Drejka's character that was a focal point of the trial. He had a history of instigating these sort of incidents. Something like this was bound to happen with him one day. He was continually looking for trouble rather than minding his own business and enjoying his retirement peacefully.
@Miriam Bamford "If he didn't pull out his gun, who knows what's gonna happen next."
2 likesDo you... at any time... see any continuation of aggressive action on the part of McGlockton, after the initial push? "Stopping the threat" was achieved by pulling out the gun. What is supposed to be the goal? Stopping
the threat or ending any possibility of a threat. You don't seem to take into account that "the fear" he was under is automatically reversed by the fact that he has a gun and McGlockton doesn't. Is this whole thing as simple as "you pushed me"... "I feel threatened"...."now I can kill you"?
Once Mr. McGlockton shoved Mr. Drejka down... and the Mr. Drejka subsequently removed his gun.... the gun itself was obviously a deterrent to any further escalation of the incident ... because Mr. McGlockton backed up at the point the gun was withdrawn. The drawn gun and Mr. McGlockton backing up was supposed to end this situation. It is IMPOSSIBLE to make the case that a man, who is backing up at the sight of a gun, is a threat to the person with the gun. The gun should have served as the "end-all" to the situation.
@Herbert West
0 likesI agree he's the original instigator, and that he's not the parking lot police. I already said this, in fact. Still, generally, you don't run up and shove someone or put your hands on someone at all who hasn't put their hands on you first. That's just escalating the situation.
@G. Marie
0 likesIt's just not wise to escalate. You saw what happened here. One idiot pushed another idiot. and that idiot got shot by the idiot who overreacted just as much. You can't let your emotions overtake you like that. You're not an animal.
@The Great Pumpkin i saw a father and husband defefend his family. That isnt animalistic, thats fatherly instinct.
0 likes@G. Marie
1 likeYou can defend without immediately resorting to force, depending on the threat. You have to use reason a little bit too. Force may be warranted, but not as the only go-to response for literally any provocation. That's just being ruled by short-sightedness. But actually, even most wild animals avoid physical conflict because they know injuries are costly and could lead to infections, which can lead to death. So this is actually even less wise than that. And in this case, it cost him his life.
EDIT: except, when defending their infants, but then animals are just acting purely on instinct and it could cause them to sacrifice themselves. Giving up your life for your child just leaves them with one less parent. Not very smart imo.
@G. Marie
0 likesHim defending his family caused his family to not have him in the picture any longer. Was that a wise decision? It wasn't a decision at all, but a brute instinct that should have been tempered.
I'll never forget the lesson an uncle taught me. We were driving and some a-hole cut him off or did something crazy, and I was like "Why don't you give him a honk?" My uncle looked at me like I was a damn fool, and told me that we have no idea who that person is, what they have on them (E.g. a gun) and that it just isn't worth it. That person was in the wrong, but running up on them at a stop light would have been irrational and from a legal perspective could have gotten my uncle in trouble.
@The Great Pumpkin in this case he couldn’t have done anything other than use force. idk if you saw the video, but michael was agitated and i have no doubt in my mind he would’ve pulled the gun on that woman and her kids, just like he had on another woman w her kids.
0 likes@G. Marie
0 likesWell, he did use force but it still cost him his life. Maybe if McGlockton had himself been armed, he could have been first to draw, but only to deter Drejka. So that wouldn't have been a use of force, but the threat of it, towards a defensive end. On the other hand, you're still just speculating b/c even if Drejka was worked up you don't know what he was actually going to do. In that moment he was just using words.
I hate being put in the position of explaining this because I don't think what Drejka did was right, but speaking in general you don't just shove someone immediately even if they are yelling at someone else. Unless they are expressing actual explicit threats, which IDK if Drejka was doing at that moment. It was obviously just a wannabe rent-a-cop ranting, although McGlockton couldn't even have known that much. That's basically my problem with his actions, is that he didn't actually know anything and he just acted out of impulse.
@The Great Pumpkin babes. i think you’re ignoring the point that michael has been doing this alot. he starts arguments just so he can flaunt and show his gun. for gods sake, he did it towards a woman with her kids! he was definitely just waiting for someone to fight back, so he could shoot. he was a wannabe police officer. and i dont have a doubt in my mind, he would have pulled his gun out on that mother with her kid.
0 likes@The Great Pumpkin and no, as i’ve already said it wasnt impulse it was instinct. if someone is yelling and swearing at my wife, i would push them too because who the hell does he think he is?
0 likes@G. Marie
0 likesYes, *WE* know Drejka's history NOW, because we've read up on it. But McGlockton didn't. For all he knew it was just some random dude shouting at his wife. I'm just saying, there's steps before violence, in general. Otherwise, you are legally viewed as the initial aggressor.
this narrator is an absolute genius. The way he breaks down this whole story line, without over narrating is incredible. super super intelligent!!
991 likesReplies (10)
The nattator isn't the writer though, check the bio
32 likesSo true, there great, really good at reading people too
4 likes" you are probably wondering why there are asking such specific questions." he says as I'm wonder that exact thing.
6 likesYea its refreshingly good!
0 likesYou should really consider his pateron. It’s only a buck and it’s ALL amazing material. All of his videos are 10/10
1 likeagree
0 likesThat’s the main reason why I watch this channel
0 likestotally agree thanks
0 likesAll of these videos are like this, i love hearing the breakdown, its so interesting
0 likesYes, proper narration, it's definitely an art in itself
0 likesSo if anyone is wondering, this guy got sentenced to 20 years and at the beginning of this year he was attacked by another inmate resulting in a head injury with 5 stitches. Wonder if he still thinks he made the right choice that day?
1803 likesReplies (108)
Thanks man I was just about to look it up
105 likesDammn that messed up
9 likesDefinitely shouldn't have shot the guy after he backed away, big mistake.
91 likesAlso, Markeis definitely should not have come up and shoved him to the ground. Bigger mistake.
@Disgusting he could have just stayed on the ground and played the victim, played up some injuries, then the fact that he was being a jerk in the first place would have been forgotten. Everyone would have moved on, a little pissed off but still alive and out of jail
123 likesHe can't use a gun in there. 🤷
19 likesAnd I was just thinking to myself, his I am god and nobody else matters mentality won't go over well in prison.
30 likesNobody made a good decision that day. Dead guy shouldn't have put hands on someone. Dead guy was shot wrongfully as a result. Wife or baby-mama or whatever she is made the mistake of taking a handicap space. The kids didn't have any choice but hopefully they end up better than their stupid parents.
68 likes@john papple the chain reaction of events really could have been stopped. This is something everyone needs to keep in their minds as they go about their day. Being courteous goes a long way to make positive changes
35 likes@john papple you know that's a dumb thing to think. That family had no fault.
53 likes@john papple No need for a speech. It's so irrelevant.
20 likes@Disgusting A shove is a bigger mistake than killing someone????????????
62 likes@Disgusting shoving a person to the ground is very different from shooting one. I can't comprehend how you can compare those two. Yeah both would hurt and are wrong, but one is a LOT WORSE than the other. And you're just saying "yeah its bad he shot the person, but the other guy shouldnt have shoved him in the 1st place."
66 likeswhatt????
@Satisfying Whirlpools Yes, biggest and last mistake that guy ever made, right?
4 likesOh yeah the guy that attacked him was the brother of the person he killed
4 likes@Disgusting Biggest mistake was Michael not minding his own business.
37 likes@john papple opinions like these get me into trouble with females when i voice them
1 like@Satisfying Whirlpools if ur white, sure it would seem right to u
1 like@john papple i agree, chain reaction. Bad behavior create bad things. Some people don't know your point, they just focus on the shooting and the murderer.
12 likespresumably the inmate was defending himself from an imminent threat....
1 like@john papple or maybe that guy shouldn’t be allowed to carry a gun. Ever think of that? That would have totally prevented this situation.
17 likes@Satisfying Whirlpools the shove got him killed. Guy who shot is essentially locked in a hotel.
1 likehaha yessss
0 likes@Disgusting Drejka was looking for any excuse to shoot someone. Even if not pushed.
18 likes@SuperAussieOi Anything can be a weapon. Also, it doesn't matter what you think. It's my right to bear arms. It's mine.
5 likes@john papple people like you make me feel sorry for a lot of Americans. Hopefully you don’t become the next Michael Drejka 🙏
16 likes@godspeeding Defending? He attacked him from behind. It's on video. "OOGA BOOGA! MY WOMAN! LEAVE ME WOMAN ALONE! OOGA BOOGA!" News flash. It's not an attack to speak to someone. Normal people don't just go around shoving people for speaking to someone they know.
8 likes@john papple While I agree with much of what you said theres one problem. The aggressor in this matter was the guy with the gun from beginning to end. Not only did he park ILLEGALLY to yell at someone who parked illegally, but he then aggressively confronted and started yelling at her. Here lies the problem he should of just parked and went into the store. He isn't a cop, he isn't a parking authority, so he has no right to chastise someone who is parking illegally. Especially since he himself parked illegally. As with the man coming out of the store; all he saw was a white man screaming, not talking, to his significant other. I would of walked up to him and got into his face in order to protect my wife and loved ones. The push might have been over board but he was more in the right than you think.
19 likesYou have the perspective of someome who hasn't had someone do what he did to a love one. So you dont know how you would react. It's easy to take a high ground and say what you say when you are so detached from this situation. You have the ability to look at the situation without emotion attached and with absolute logic. That doesn't apply to this situation at all.
@Satisfying Whirlpools apparently to some people. Hence this case.
0 likes@john papple Worse, baby-mama waited till she saw "her man" sneaking up to get out of the car and in his face to make herself appear in need of defense to her man. Baby-momma was so happy to see Drejka knocked down, but she got her man killed.
7 likes@Mathias B “all he saw was a WHITE man”
4 likesThat’s racist.
5 stitches? I tripped and fell down the stairs and broke my nose, bruised my ribs, had stitches in my forehead and lip. Lmao.
1 like@SuperAussieOi
4 likesAnd people like you make me happy I live in America.
Just goes to show to mind your own business. Yes, people who illegally park are douchebags. Yes, people who are arguing with your significant other should make you angry. But it’s better to de-escalate the situation and swallow your pride for a minute to just be able to walk away. You’ll always be grateful when you think about what COULD have happened if you reacted the wrong way.
7 likes@Johanna Patlan no, it's not irrelevant.
1 likeThe other guy is dead and left 4 kids with no father figure, because he felt like charging at a man having an argument.
1 like@Mathias B I totally agree with you! Well said..blessings🙏🏻💖
0 likes@john papple where are you getting your information from? Do we know for a fact that both the victim and his partner were fully able-bodied? Do you know what the victim’s partner said to warrant you referring to her as “dumb.” Do you know what was said between the two parties for the victim to push the perpetrator to the ground?
5 likesYou’ve made so many assertions based on a footage without audio that it is astounding!
@Just CHI-CHI
2 likesThis little clip was actually a pretty big story. I, for one, followed it because it had a lot to do with the gun world and stand your ground laws. They were yelling at each other and the shooting victim pushed the shooter. At that point, he is the primary aggressor even if he or his wife were disabled. Words are not a reason for violence. It’s a god damned shame he was killed but his actions lead to the shooting. It’s called a “but for” in legal jargon
@Just CHI-CHI She didn't have a handicap pass. She had no right to be there. This all started because she was parked illegally. Of course that's a very minor thing compared to the rest, but yes this could have been avoided at so many different points. The shooter is guilty, but don't get your feelings in a twist because a commenter pointed out she also had done wrong.
4 likes@Otoshi God but I didn’t “get my feelings in a twist” lol. Did you read what I wrote or did you respond impetuously?
1 likeI’m saying that the commenter made a lot of judgement - particularly moral judgements - about the victims based on a clip.
Everything will be alright. It’s not that serious! Calm down, silly
@Just CHI-CHI I am calm and I read your comment. No need to further speculate and give her more benefits of a doubt. Parking in a handicap spot doesn't make her evil, just inconsiderate and selfish. But even in the case that she or her boyfriend is disabled despite moving around just fine to the store which tells me other parking spots would have been fine, she didn't have any plates or signs and the confrontation started there. It doesn't cost you anything to be decent and as a result you can better avoid these confrontations. I am not victim blaming, but I do think you shouldn't take away from a self-teaching moment regardless of whose side you take.
1 like@Otoshi God that’s the thing, I am not taking a side. I feel sympathetic for the victims, but that is a very logical and normal response to the situation.
1 likeFirst, there are different forms of disabilities. Being able to walk to the store does not completely erase the fact that anyone of them could still suffer from a disability
Second, I recognize that tragedy still happens to those who make all the right decisions and avoid confrontations. The point that the shooting would have been avoided is moot for this reason. Also, according to the video and the murderer’s interrogation, he is an aggressor and carries around a weapon to intimidate people.
I can recognize this murder as an unfortunate event with several people being at the wrong place at the wrong time, regardless of whether their individual choices led them to where they are. And most importantly - while I recognize that you’re not doing this - I strongly believe people should reserve morally judging the victims based on this silent clip. We’re all lacking context. We can avoid victim blaming by logically observing the altercation for what it was - an unfortunate misunderstanding that resulted in murder. We actually know more about the murderer from his interrogation and I can safely say he seems to live a sad life
@Just CHI-CHI They could suffer a disability. But not one warranting that parking space. Usually that parking spot is reserved for ramp access considering that the other spots are about equal distance to the door way anyways. Not really an excuse for that. No need to dig for one either. You can remain sympathetic for the victims and still be unbiased. It's obvious the murderer just looks for confrontations and if not this family it could have easily happened to another. It seems like this was just something waiting to happen. But any action you can take to minimize these kinds of unnecessary confrontations is still a good thing. In the comment section of YouTube that's something I will maintain for others. Of course if I were talking with the family I wouldn't feel the need to mention anything about that. They are well aware I am sure of the chain of events that occurred and how they could have done things differently. But no excuses need to be made. We should not attack the victims, but we should still caution against careless behavior.
2 likes@Otoshi God ok. While I disagree with you, I really don’t vehemently disagree. You seem rational and level-headed enough. My comment was really in response to the person who said this: “wife or baby-mama or whatever she is made the mistake of taking a handicap space”
2 likesIf that comment isn’t loaded with a whole lot of stereotyping, insults, and condescending judgements about the victim’s character, then I don’t know what is. Of course the poster said more but I don’t care to copy the rest.
I hear you. I don’t agree but I don’t also disagree entirely.
@john papple Just because someone makes the dumb decision to park in a handicap space, it shouldn’t lead to someone getting shot and/or killed. This guy was looking for trouble.And, Even if someone gets
1 likeshovedto the ground by a non-armed person, it should not lead to someone getting shot and/or killed, it’s insane.@Karolin It shouldn't escalate. That's my point. How did it start? Blame the guy who cares about his community enough to call someone out who is inconsiderate about the needs of disabled people? Or blame the guy who attacks another man from behind like some kind of idiot? If talking to someone is where it escalated, then I guess I'm lucky as hell that I've never been shot. It couldn't have anything to do with my keeping my hands to myself and being reasonable. You say "looking for trouble". Seemed like the dead black guy had no problem starting trouble. I wonder if he thought about how bad of an idea shoving him was. We'll never know if he learned. Hopefully his kids learned to mind their manners and keep their hands to themselves. That's the only way that his death could have any meaning.
4 likesThese people never learn. He no doubt blames someone other than himself
0 likes@Just CHI-CHI I can understand your perspective. Although it's clear we have a slight difference in opinion. Thanks for the civil discussion.
0 likes@john papple is it that serious? People need to mind their own business.
1 like@nunya bizness you're assuming
1 like@G Victor like you wouldnt do the same?
1 likeIf someone is talking down to one of your loved ones, you're not gonna do anything?
Maybe not get physical but you would approach.
This dude is an UBER snitch.. He snitching on people he don't even know on a citation level offense. I bet this dude is in PC snitching on EVERYONE to try to be buddy buddy with the CO's. "Excuse me officer! Officer! I have some very important Intel on the Surenos bringing in 2 oz of black tar. That's Heroin apparently.."
1 like@elly you can say that everyone made a mistake while also realizing that one stupid mistake leads to another. He should never have shot him and being pushed to the ground doesnt warrant being killed, but to only fault one person for this entire situation is also dumb...clearly no one is saying that killing someone is fine. everyone needs to use their big boy brains and realize everyone fucked up. the guy who fucked up the most was the guy who committed, in my opinion, first degree manslaughter. actions have consequences this is the real world
2 likes@Ronin Kraut exactly
0 likes@Amara M yes. That’s exactly the point. In most countries it is forbidden to even carry a small screwdriver without a good reason.
0 likesPeople do not seem to understand that guns are not used for defense at all. Look it up. People who have a gun or a knife are very likely to use it for what they think is justified but is not at all.
@Amara M I agree. More than one person made a mistake that night, and as you pointed out, there is a huge difference in the degree of the mistake one person commited versus the other. To compare those actions as if they were on the same level seemed wrong to me. The commenter i was replying to seemed to think that shoving a person to the ground is bigger of a deal than shooting and killing an unarmed man. Or even vice versa: that murdering a person is just a minor offense comparable to pushing the person to the ground. I thought that kind of mindset quite disturbing.
3 likes@Nathan van Dalen Wait what?? I was being sarcastic. Guns are used defensively 2.5 million times a year. vs around 50k gun deaths, half of those are suicides, the other 40 percent are gang violence, and they often use illegal firearms...I did look it up...you look up the FBI stats lol
1 like@Amara M they are banned. You aren’t allowed to carry a knife in public and cannot use one as a weapon.
0 likes@SuperAussieOi that's not my point but ok 😅 regardless if you make things illegal or not people will find a way to use them incorrectly. In America we have our second Amendent rights. Guns are used in self defense 2.5 million times per year vs 50k gun deaths per year. again half of those are suicides and most of the rest are gang violence (illegal weapons). And semi auto pistols account for the vast majority of gun violence. Very rarely are rifles or "assault rifles" (as some people like to incorrectly label them) used to kill people.
0 likes@Disgusting How was that the bigger mistake? The other guy literally killed him. If he couldn't take an ass whooping he should've just left that family alone tf. They were minding their business.
2 likesHe made a better choice than the other man . 🤣
0 likes@Ronin Kraut couldnt have said it better myself!!
1 like@Satisfying Whirlpools well I mean who's still alive?
0 likes@Devin Watson everyone in jail for murder is still alive while their victims are dead. That doesn’t make them in the right.
2 likesI think he might have, haven’t watched the full episode tho, only some of it.
0 likesAlexa, play “Choices” by E-40
0 likes@Tobias Engel feel ya
0 likes@Francesco Vassallo 😂😂
0 likesOfficer: "So explain to me... If the deer was 50 yards off the road in the field adjacent to the road... How exactly were you in imminent danger"
3 likesDimwit: "Well I had to neutralize the threat"
Officer: "But the deer was 50 yards off...the road"
Dimwit: "He twitched"
Officer: "So you swerved off the road to ... Neutralize the threat"
Dimwit: "Affirmative delta, tango, foxtrot, anal plug"
#Justice
1 like@john papple just because it's yours doesn't give you the right to use it against or to whatever the fuck you want
1 like@happyfacefries It sure doesn't. You have any other helpful, yet obvious information to share with us?
0 likes@elly Escalating a verbal confrontation into a physical one is the greater mistake. You can't die by yelling back and forth. But when it's physical, you can die. Even without weapons involved.
1 likeLMFAOOO THE LAST SENTENCE
0 likes@Johanna Patlan LMFAOAOAOAOAOO BAHAHAH
0 likesLol good
0 likesseeing this made my day better
0 likesYall got excuses for everything. Trayvon was walking doen the street and got shot and ysll made excuses for the white man who shot him too. Let the roles have been reversed though 😒
1 like@john papple The most reasonable assessment of this whole incident that I’ve seen on these comments. I couldn’t have said it any better.
0 likesBarney Fife wannabe should have just minded his own business .
1 like@B was it her not him parked in a disabled spot?
0 likesBless you for the update. I needed to hear this
1 likehe doesn’t have his gun now does he
1 like@Chicken Pizza Uhmm.. did anybody say that shoving someone is okay? 🤔
0 likesInmates probably finally got tired of him saying “negative “ and “neutralize” all the time.
0 likes@Johanna Patlan You mean apart from the women who took up a disabled space when her and her man and kids were not, and he should not have just pushed the man over No Fault,really
0 likesKarma
0 likes@Keith Lillis I read he has threatened ppl with his gun before, and even pointed his gun during a road rage incident, and I think it said he even shot, just to scare someone tho. That man was def looking to use that gun. Have you watched the Michael Dunn case? Same sort of outcome. That guy is the biggest prick I ever saw.
1 likeOnly 20 years? I was expecting him to stay there all his life?! Isn't that how it usually is?
1 like@Orlando gonzales Really?
0 likes@john papple clutching at straws
1 like@Jimbo Jones Painting a window.
0 likes@Disgusting the bigger mistake was shoving a dude compared to KILLING someone? WTF? Get your priorities in order.
0 likes@elly Well it is a bigger mistake because he triggered an stramger that might react overboard,as it happened in this case. Smarter approach would be to ask what's the problem and yield to the request to move the car as the idiot with the gun was correct in his assertion in the first pkace.
0 likesThank you i was thinking he will get 10-12 years but 20 is better.
0 likes@john papple How about you get off the comments and go shout at a woman and some children since apparently you find that totally ok. Don’t come crying to me when the husband shows up, I tried telling you.
0 likes@Dobby From Harry Potter I didn't hear any shouting. I don't shout at people. I don't know what you mean by that. Nice strawman. Keep on track if you want to disagree with me civilly. Don't just make stuff up and put words in my mouth. I won't have any problem with anybody because I don't start problems. If problems come up, I know how to solve them. No need to worry about my safety. Sorry you're so upset about some dead guy you never knew. You should think about why it's causing you to behave so irrationally. It's pretty weird.
0 likes@Dobby From Harry Potter Also, that's fascinating that so many of your friends put themselves in dumb situations. I hope you learn to cope with your personal problems. You seem to be harboring a lot of anger. Were you raised by a single mother? I ask because you act much like a woman. Calm down a bit. Anger just makes you tired and confused.
0 likes@Dobby From Harry Potter Maybe take up a hobby to occupy yourself. Use that energy for something productive. You're poisoning yourself by letting the anger take control. Men don't act this way. I hope you start to feel better :)
0 likes@Dobby From Harry Potter Also I only asked questions. I don't assume much but you're pretty blatant so you seem pretty familiar. I know people like you. You seem to be talking to me as if you're talking to the shooter from the video. I really couldn't care less about either of them. I only joined the discussion here and now you're throwing a fit. Think about that. Again, I hope you feel better.
0 likes@john papple The way you talk about the shooter vs the dead father is really telling of your morals. Hope you unlearn all that ugliness before you hurt someone.
0 likesmissmerbella here is the church and here is the steeple, you can’t be racist towards white people.
0 likes@Ed Zamper I agree that it is smarter to try solving problems through discussion instead of resorting to violence right away. Though, can you imagine if one day you go towards your car, and an adult man is right outside it, having a heated argument with your wife while your young son/daughter is also there nearby... I think the dad's impulse when he tried to shove away the dude is coming from the instinct of protecting his family and not just pure dumb aggression.
0 likesSo I still would not equate shoving someone to the ground with shooting someone multiple times, then playing the victim afterwards.
@Ed Zamper also I'm kinda curious if you would actually do that... Let an annoying dude shout at your wife/mother/daughter over parking space, keep your peace, and do his bidding without context of iis he carrying a gun or not.
0 likesIf you actually would do it for fear that a random guy carries a gun, i think there could be some problems there in itself. Maybe societies and parking spaces should be safer than that. Just my thoughts
@elly Well, do not confuse prudence with cowardice. You never know with people out there what are their true intentions. You certainly should not push anyone like that because you don't have context on what was happening, and still the guy knew he was right even though he was being a moron. You must approach and try to be reasonable. If the guy keeps at it, best course of action is still say okay, shut up and leave. If the guy continues to intimidate AND pushes you or makes a hint at harming your family, then you better be prepared to fight and turn it into a mush right there with all your might and as fast as possible. There is only so many seconds of adrenaline in the body and better to use it appropriately, the guy must be neutralized as fast as possible. That should always be the last resort.
0 likesHowever, in this particular situation, that the stupid moron was going to pull a gun and actually shoot it, was totally unexpected....
@SuperAussieOi No. what would have prevented the situation is following the rules. 1. Don’t park illegally in a handicapped spot. 2. Don’t shove people to the ground. 3. Don’t fire your weapon if someone is backing away from you.
0 likes@Ed Zamper I wont ever disagree that prudence is a good thing. But if you say the man who got shot made the bigger mistake because he happened to lack prudence, i cannot agree at all. One guy died because he wasn't prudent, while the gunman killed an unarmed individual in front of his family because of parking space issues. To those who insist that the victim made a bigger mistake, i just dont know what to say.
0 likes@Ed Zamper This sad tragedy can serve as a lesson to all of us. And i'd agree with u, we should be careful and tactful when interacting with people we don't know.
0 likesBut I dont think there is any need to blame the victim. Afterall, how sure are we that the issue would've been resolved peacefully if the guy didn't shove the shooter. I mean, he was probably itching to use the gun. He had it in him, ready to pull it out at the slightest provocation. Was he waiting for physical threats at all? Maybe a bad word or odd tone was all it takes for that man to pull it out. What are the chances that, even if the guy just talked, he would shoot him anyway?
I’m speechless. This guy is everything you should aspire not to be. I hope the children of the man he killed grow to be wonderful people… sad their father lost his life due to Michael…
1190 likesReplies (32)
Dude shouldn't have assaulted this man and he would still be alive. Starting a fight is always a stupid idea
39 likes@Jimbo Jones i think he just wanted to protect his girlfriend, i mean yea at some point it sure was unnecessary, but if you think about it, it may or may not seem justified. people could argue about that all day, what matters is the fact that killing someone really is not an option, nor should it ever be one. starting a fight is one thing, but killing a breathing person because you just feel like that’s the only thing that’s going to protect you is 1. not only pussy behavior but 2. also a completely different chapter
113 likes@sürpriz.dersim62 yeah there's no justification for the man shooting him. He held up the gun paused for a second and then shot a man just standing and looking at him. Some people have a messed up idea of what self defence is they think if someone hits them they can use any level of violence they want.
55 likesIt doesn't matter whether the victim was right or wrong, he started an unnecessary fight with an idiot and it cost him his life, if he just talked to him and wasn't so aggressive he would be alive. The other man was 100% wrong but it was the victim that escalated it to violence.
@Jimbo Jones as i said, it started because the victim couldn’t hold himself back, but shooting someone is really just so disgusting. agreed.
15 likes@Jimbo Jones who knows? Michael just threatened another person in that same parking lot the month before, in other words, he had a history, i think if it wasn’t this guy, it would’ve been anither guy as he was most likely just looking for a person to “rightfully” shoot. As for the victim, we won’t ever know if he was “starting a fight” or simply trying to defend his girlfriend because he never got to give his side of the story, regardless, the consequence doesn’t fit the action, he literally only pushed him, he didn’t beat him up or anything, he was objectively not a threat and it’s obvious from the video Micheal knew that.
33 likes@Jimbo Jones I agree violence is wrong but that doesn't deserve death
20 likes@sürpriz.dersim62 the victim didn’t start it tho, he was defending his family, id do the same thing if anyone started walking towards my girl and yelling at her. the suspect initiated the entire thing and the victim was just protecting his family for a split second.
32 likes@Mateo Certain yess that’s what i‘m saying. i can totally understand the way the victim reacted, i mean, who wouldn’t. there’s literally nothing that could convince me the shooting was justified, because it simply wasn’t. i’m really sorry for his family especially his children and i hope they all have a good life despite the circumstances
11 likesLook at the double-standard here in the comments.
7 likes"Just because a guy shoves you doesn't give you the right to shoot him"
True... but apply the same reasoning to the following.
"Just because someone is arguing with a woman (wife, girlfriend, stranger... I don't know their relationship) it doesn't give you the right to tackle him to the ground."
The yelling back and forth, obnoxious as it might be, is completely legal. Deal with it legally.
The victim is the first person to push this confrontation over the threshold into assault. Well congrats... you got shot. Bet you wish you hadn't assaulted him, huh?
Now of course, I'm not saying I think that shooting was justified. It wasn't. But as I see it, the victim assaulted an innocent man (legally, that man WAS innocent at that time) and Michael murdered a man who assaulted him. Both are guilty of taking a bad situation and making it worse.
If Michael had just used his gun justifiably, the man who shoved him would most likely have been charged.
You can't dig yourself out of a hole. Both of them are guilty of trying.
@Run the Numbers yikes, for a lot of fake legal talk you sure don’t seem to understand the definition of legal assault. Assault is not physical, verbal assault is infact perfectly legal cause for self defense/protection defense. The man had legal right to shove him given that he feared his wife was in danger due to the verbal assault. Michael saw the man back up and start to turn away, michael had no reason to shoot him because the man was not at all showing any sign of hurting him further then a shove.
17 likes@Run the Numbers honestly dude, this was a lot. you’re spitting so much to make the victim look like some bad dude. he believed his wife and children were possibly in danger. the fact that you automatically start calling him a bad person for a simple shove says a lot. all these other things you bring up are fine points if the defender hadn’t genuinely shot and killed the victim. if the defendant had punched him then sure you could say that was justified and they’re equal parties. but if someone starts walking towards my wife screaming profanities, im not gonna stop and listen if they specifically say they’re gonna harm her, i am gonna be sure as hell to walk right towards him and put distance between him most likely gonna shove him. he had no right to shot, any person who has any common sense would feel that shove and be like “alright sht i was getting too much” and walk away or just get up and continue. he took his gun pointed it at a man backing away and shot him.
12 likes@Mateo Certain
2 likesDude... skip jury duty. You don't have the temperment for it.
I hope the children grow up to be wonderful people, too! They are the only victims here.
0 likesAgainst all odds of being raised partway through childhood by two classless, entitled people that park in handicapped spaces, assault people over words, and then raised the second half of their childhood without a father thanks to Johnny Shooter that was just itchin' to use those hollow points.
That child father was going to a local store to get a milk !!! I wonder why he doesn't return yet🤨🤔🤔🤔
1 like@Mateo Certain defending his family from what? A guy literally asking why they parked in a handicapped parking space? Zero prefrontal cortex
3 likes@Mateo Certain if you think physically assaulting someone because they yelled at your girl, you might catch a bullet just like this man did. Words are words. Dying over words isn't very manly.
1 like@Sancho Panza A push is a push, killing someone because of a push is pretty pathetic.
4 likesit's not sad he's obviously not capable of controlling his actions. In what world are his actions okay? You understand you can easily kill someone pushing them like that right? Yeah I'm sure his kids will be great people lol what a great role model father they had
0 likes@Bio mutant It is stated that the argument between Michael and the Girlfriend could be heard from inside. He left his son inside because he knew he was safe. It is safe to assume he thought Michael was a threat to his wife(and baby), because he heard the argument and pushed him. To use Micheal's words, the Boyfriend tried to neutralize the threat, unlike Michel it wouldn't of involve casualties. If he wanted to beat up Michael he could've easily done so from behind, a good blow to the head is an easy way.
3 likesyea, right
0 likesThe guy pushed him over.
1 likeHe was defending himself.
Should be end of story
@Mateo Certain And the guy who was on the floor was defending himself.
0 likesSo what's your point.
@Mateo Certain I agree. I can't believe Drejka found someone to marry him. No job, no ambition, no brains, no guts, no honor.
0 likes@Mateo Certain Thanks for your comment. It's nice to see someone with knowledge reason and brains.
1 like@Run the Numbers No that's you. You think is reasonable to pack a gun while antagonizing women and children. It's disturbing that you can't see why it's a problem. Perhaps you think Drejka should have gotten out of his old truck pointing the weapon at her and the kids.
2 likes@Looking 4 Things
1 likeSo now you're anti-gun?
It was a perfectly legal firearm, so the first point is... he didn't break the law by simply having the gun... just like driving a car isn't illegal. But if a person driving a car doesn't stop at a crosswalk, THEN it becomes illegal.
Same thing in this case. Having a gun was not the illegal part of what transpired. The illegal part of what transpired isn't even that he shot a man who assaulted him (which is also legal). The part where what he did became illegal is when he used the gun to stop the assault... and then WHEN THE ASSAULT WAS CLEARLY OVER, he shot. Matter of fact, he probably could have legally justified shooting this man while he was being assaulted. It's the pause between the actions that made this a felony (and rightfully so... as the pause between shows that self-defense was NOT the purpose of shooting)
And if you truly are anti-gun, just look at violence statistics in areas with more gun control. It's ALWAYS higher (both raw AND per-capita). Somehow, people are safer around people with guns than they are around people without them. It's almost as though the guns served as some sort of... great equalizer or something.
It's my personal opinion that if you are a woman of gun carrying age and you aren't carrying one, you're retarded. Guns are good. Guns are hand-held steel "mutually assured destruction" and if we're going to talk statistics, women are the BEST people in the world to have guns. Even though women are not as competent with pistols, they use them more responsibly than men.
What the world needs is more men with guns... and WAAAAAAAAY more women with guns.
Lol. "Aspire not to be" Hilarious. Hes lived his life having no sense of ambition whatsoever. Retired at 30 and looking to shoot someone everyday since.
3 likes@Run the Numbers Wow. Lets hope you dont have a family with babies to protect.
1 like@Mateo Certain Thanks your protective instincts are intact. Its pretty frightening to read so many argue the father shouldn't have pushed Drejka. Im shocked by it.
3 likes@Mateo Certain “defending his family”
0 likesAn argument with words doesn’t require physical intervention.
He saw someone arguing with his wife, and thought, “I’ll show you, you SOB”
It was malice and anger, not protection.
My wife has argued many times but I don’t immediately come in and attack people.
Father loses his life over a parking spot! I can't understand this and sort it out in my head.
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii
0 likesThe world needs more of that attitude.
There needs to be a mutual understanding between a man and a woman... and it is so easy for it to fall apart.
The woman needs to understand that when she starts shit, she might be putting her husband in actual physical danger (because there might come a point where the situation escalates, and when it does... it becomes the man's problem).
The man needs to TRUST that when his wife finds herself in a conflict that it truly was unavoidable, and therefore the man needs to take over and perhaps threaten violence.
This all falls apart if you've got a domineering woman that doesn't like to back down from conflicts. Makes it impossible for her man to tell the difference between petty bullshit and a real honest-to-goodness volatile situation.
If you're her man, you have to look at that situation like, "I see that you're yelling... but I don't trust that. You start shit over dumb conflicts all the time and then expect me to back you up with violence... and this habit will EVENTUALLY get me shot."
It's a terrible situation for a man to be in... not knowing whether his wife is in a situation that calls for violence... or if she's writing all sorts of checks that you can't cash because she's a self-centered impulsive hag.
I love the confidence he has when he's making incriminating statements. Its actually hilarious.
416 likes"Did he do anything to make you shoot him?" "No negative, absolutely nothing."
Replies (6)
Tyler Ramos dude. No. Now you’re looking for the stupid petty arguments.
7 likesIKR lmmfao
1 like@Pwnstar unfortunately he wasn't innocent!
0 likes@Fringa Lof I didn't mean to imply he was innocent. My point was that NOBODY should talk to the cops.
4 likes@Pwnstar sorry, misunderstood. But in this case I'm happy he talked.
2 likes@Tyler Ramos I dont think pwnstar was implying that. sounded to me like he was saying everyone has a job to do. Cops are obligated to arrest and provide evidence, your job is to ask for a lawyer, the lawyer makes the cops find the evidence for themselves
1 likeCant imagine how traumatic this is for the kid watching his dad dying on the floor of a gas station when you guys just went there for snacks
1436 likesReplies (45)
He kills and destroys for nothing another one's life and within his own too...
3 likes@Last One or maybe the stranger should mind his fucking Business
15 likes@Jaeger Bartlett what a troll you are lol
6 likesNigga played the old uno flip card
5 likes@Last One why even take the time to downplay trauma? I will never understand people like you 🤨
8 likesCan you imagine that “kid” watching his father beating people for arguing with his monk.. mother that she parked on handicapped spot?
10 likes@Shjkesnc man if you really think that you’re fucked in the mind. There’s so many ways he could have confronted her with out being disrespectful. If he did that then there wouldn’t have been any conflict. It’s his fault he messed up. I hope he rots in jail. 🤷🏿♀️
18 likes@Sidus Pulverem huh? Your comment doesn’t make any sense...
6 likes@Sidus Pulverem why is kid in quotation marks
3 likes@Neeners i think he said monk... instead of monkey and kid in quotations because he thinks black people arent people
16 likes@Dean McKenzie well that’s messed up. Guess he’s a troll
8 likes@Dean McKenzie that is what you think... obviously
2 likes@NotFine phone keyboard autocorection and fat fingers all in one
2 likes@Neeners i hope it makes sense to you soon 😉
1 like@Sidus Pulverem it won’t
7 likesbet they don't park in disabled slots, ever.
0 likesSeriously that makes me sick & to see this guy in the interview crying because he misses his dogs 🙄😒🤢🤮
6 likesHopefully the kid learned a valuable lesson from his dad...
2 likes🤣
0 likes@Sidus Pulverem you're trying too hard.
0 likes@Gdadder that's a bit over dramatic on your part too, don't you think mate?
0 likes@Shjkesnc The white man himself parked illegally. Don't even try to bring up handicapped parking when he himself intentionally violated laws relating to handicapped parking.
8 likesMaybe he shouldn't push some guy who wasn't doing anything
4 likes@Clover MX "who wasn't doing anything" A man who has for months been threatening black families who were minding their own business with their lives, for months on end. A man who was doing the same thing to his family. Considering that's literally illegal, I don't think that the white man "wasn't doing anything". Tell me, if a man was threatening your family with their lives right in front of you, would you do whatever you could to protect your family? Would you defend your family from the undeniable aggressor, who we now know will not hesitate to end a human life? If your answer is "no" then you're a coward, and a fucking hypocrite considering what your personal politics probably are. If you answered "yes", then you're saying that the man who was shot did the right thing, and that the white man was absolutely wrong. So, is it a yes, or is it a no?
8 likesWas his fault he payed the price
0 likesThere are a lot of very racist people in this reply thread holy crap. Or at least self centered/extremely narrow minded.
10 likesLike, chill. Killing isn't all black and white (unintended racist pun sorry). "Well, he's black and he pushed the guy so fuck him he gets to die"
Curb your fascism
Eh whatever, its the internet. What can you do about it?
(also I applaud all those who think for more than 2 seconds before they speak and defend this poor bastard and his son.)
@Skeleton bones Ghoulie Unfortunately, the GOP can't seem to die off fast enough to get their racist and morally wrong views out of the system. The only thing we can do about it is call them out for it, and educate others so they don't become like these very people.
2 likes@Clover MX he was doing something lmao did you even watch the video??
2 likes@{XUVX} Inframare well it didn’t go that way did it? I don’t know why you brought that up.
0 likesHid dad should’ve kept his fkn hands to himself!!
4 likes@Chris Topher aww go cry about it lmaooo
3 likes@NotFine he probably saying she cheated on him with another man •_•
0 likes@Dean McKenzie Dude he was just joking you really think he would say something like that for no reason
0 likes@Phillipe Sebolte he's not the parking authority. He had no business verbally accosting the woman sitting in the car. And he wasn't in fear of his life when he pulled the trigger. Case closed.
1 like@God Wins As I've stated before, entirely correct.
1 likethese kinda things wouldn’t happen if people didn’t park in handicapped spots and didn’t act like ignorant people when someone challenges they’re actions. if people just acted and did as they were supposed to shit wouldn’t happen
0 likes@pilt bike These things also wouldn't happen if people didn't illegally park next to handicapped parking spaces, didn't mind their own business, and/or didn't shoot a retreating and unarmed person. These things also wouldn't happen if people didn't threaten other people over minor and inconsequential matters. The woman is only guilty of a thing hat should just give her a ticket, her boyfriend is guilty of nothing, and the murderer is guilty of exactly that: murder. Due to this murderer's past, it's pretty clear that he might have started threatening her even if she hadn't done something, so it's still on him for making this whole thing an issue, it's still on him for threatening a person while he's armed, and it's still on him for taking another person's life in cold blood.
0 likesHe should've thought about that before pushing the man with that amount of force could've killed the old man so karma strikes again
0 likesJust because of a shove
0 likesThat was my first thought too was about the kid. That's so tragic.
0 likes@Neeners bro sure it was disrespectful to confront someone but maybe don’t illegally park and then assault somebody
0 likes@Neeners how many comments can a person make. Calm down kid, take a nap
0 likesbro fr
0 likes@A kid lol? I can make as many comments as I want why does that bother you?
0 likes@A maybe don’t shoot someone and then act like youre innocent. Plain and simple :)
0 likesThis is messed up on so many levels. This guy wasn’t even handicapped and still acted as the parking lot guardian who eventually ended a man’s life in front of his wife and kids...
91 likesSpecial Agent(guardian of the safe mart) Drejka deployed himself across from the handicap parking suspect and scanned the area as any navy seal spec ops operator with class S training would do. He was then assaulted by the opposing force and was able to launch a counter attack with a superior weapon, that being glock 22 cambered in .40 S&W with a hensoldt red sight and poly mag grip and titanium bolt carriers. The enemy was 0.0005 clicks away when special forces master agent Michael "the terminator machine force XTreme" Drejka eliminated the unarmed enemy force before they had time to retreat.
1351 likesIn short, the mission to protect the handicap spot the quik mart was a total success. I recommend a gold star for agent ninja assassin Drejka, the president sends his regards. The country thanks you
Replies (45)
I’m crying
72 likes💀💀💀
44 likesFucking gold 😂😂
52 likesCounty*
7 likesLMFAOO I feel you could make a decent living by creating animated satire clips
35 likesThis needs way more “likes”
14 likesLol. I bet he'll go to his grave defending himself and drive the other inmates to help him there.
21 likes@Jake of All Trades nope
6 likesLiterally a fucking genius lmao
7 likeshis whole life has been leading up to this
12 likesHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
5 likeshahahah magnificent!
5 likesI nominate this comment - for the - 2021 comment of the year.
8 likesYour version probably has less superlatives than what was actually going on in his head.
11 likes@HEAVENS TO BETSY lol probably.
5 likesBest comment by far, kudos
4 likesyou have a way with words, brandon 😂
3 likes@Kaleb Peters 😊 thank you. 😊
1 like@Looking 4 Things im sorry wtf did you just say?
1 likesounds like an open and shut case
2 likesDamn
1 likeI concur with the assessment of Operator Drejka's noble actions. This after-action report has been accepted and filed. I will be recommending Special Agent Drejka for the congressional medal of honour.
9 likesYou guys are laughing but it leads me to being sad when I realize that this is probably along the lines of how the guy really thought of himself
6 likesExtremely professional use of force multiplier. Rumour has it the police chief shed a tear when he got to shake Drejka's hand. The nation salutes you, sir.
4 likes@peccantis 😁
0 likes@Deans Deck i actually knew guys like that.
1 likethe world needs more people like u
1 like@Alligator Magnet Man ahh, stop, *blushing*🥰
1 likesalutes
1 likewhole thing was funny but I lost it at "ninja assassin" lmaoooo
1 like“class S”
1 likeLMAO NINJA ASSASSIN
1 likeBro, this comment is GOLD! 😎
1 likeOh hell know
1 likeCr1tikal is that you?
1 likeLmfao this is absolute gold
1 likeThis is brilliant, suits this guy to a tee. Drejka reminds me of the meme "Wtf did you just say to me you little bitch? I'll have you know I'm a spec ops sniper etc etc..."
1 likeIf I didn't know that a person was murdered because of that, I would say it's hilarious.
1 like@Agfd humor can have a way of Illustrating ideas that are more difficult to express directly. The real idea is kind of horrible though, a man had to be murdered for michaels ego to be satisfied.
2 likesNoooooo
1 likeNow THIS is delicious copy pasta.
0 likes@Grau Gaming its not copy pasta, its original. But you are welcomed to steal it if you want.
1 like@Alby is that the moist critical guy? Ive seen some of his clips, hes really funny. Thats a real compliment, thanks!!!
0 likesI know this is a joke, but please don’t praise this man.
1 like?? The Quick Mart was not under attack - it was being patronised as requested and desired.
0 likes`` Mr. Draco was the victim here `` well done defense.
1 likeDon’t talk to police. Lawyer. Remain silent. Repeat.
1 likeme rewatching these videos until he uploads again
2 likeshe's so wrong like he says i got tackled then the guy pushed him without walking / running toward him. put yourself in the position of the guy who got shot, you walk out of the gas station and some middle aged tatted dude is screaming at your gf, i probably would open the same way that guy who pushed him did.
0 likesNot justifying the shooting but why park in a handicap spot? Especially with all those open spots? Some of these handicapped people are pissed off at the world. I got cussed out by a guy in a wheelchair for using the handicap entrance for the metro even though he wasn’t anywhere near me.
0 likesI cannot believe he was allowed to leave that interview room! 😮
0 likesDude went out looking for shit to get into and he knows it. "Manslaughter" my ass
0 likesThis idiot was on the floor looking at the guy who just hit him who is already backing up, and yet he fired anyways? Timing is everything. Sure he was attacked from behind, but if your attacker yields you don’t get to shoot him.
1 likeBoth guys overreacted. This guys reaction was just over the top tho.
0 likesThe poor guy who got shot was absolutely justified in pushing the other guy away aswell. He was acting aggressively to his wife! Of course you would want to defend/protect your significant other. RIP.
1 likeReplies (3)
No actually, he wasn’t. It was a verbal argument and he escalated it into being a physical encounter. If he had landed any different like hitting his head he could have died and that’s not an exaggeration. Fact is, the entire situation was wrong moves by both parties. Illegal parking, unnecessary force, and then the use of a gun unnecessarily.
0 likes@BrandenJ29 yikes
0 likes@BrandenJ29 If the verbal exchange occurs in such a manner as to make one fear for their safety, it's assault. He's standing at her door. He has her trapped in the car as he's berating her. His verbal barrage was sufficient to draw the attention a customer who exited the store and then just sat in her car as well as the two drivers who pulled in AFTER the exchange started.
0 likesIf a cop had been there Drejka would have been instructed to walk away and, had he not, he would have been arrested for assault.
Legally: the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim.
This guy talks like he is apart of local militia. He knew he was shooting when he hit the ground
1 likeHow is no one talking about the guy sleeping in the courtroom at 47:41, if you rewind a bit you see him awake
0 likesAnd then at 50:37 he is removed from the courtroom, I would assume because of sleeping
This is like a television commercial for "Say Nothing but Attorney Please". Good cop bad cop, just trying to understand. Look the dude with a gun was in the wrong for firing but NEVER EVER EVER speak to the cops without representation and NEVER EVER EVER consent to anything. The video may be damning, but perhaps while he was looking at the guy, before he shot, he saw the guy's face and eyes and maybe saw him swell up like one does before the attack.
0 likesTotal coward... There was NO reason to fire the gun...
2 likesThis guy is a Kevin.
31 likesHe’s been waiting to confront someone for a while and he knew he had a gun to ultimately win when he finally did
Replies (1)
What is a Kevin? Is that supposed to be a male Karen or something lmao
2 likesI mean i get frustrated when non handicapped people park in handicapped spots too, but id never leave my vehicle and and cause a conflict. Id just think "That's inconsiderate" and walk away. No harn done.
0 likesThis guy HAS to be related to Jeremy Dewitte. Could you imagine those two idiots together roaming the streets. Instituting law and order.
0 likesWell, two wrongs definitely don’t make a right
0 likesImagine taking 3 seconds to accurately aim at a vital target when your life is in "danger"
7 likesPeople think the world would be safer if everyone carried. I imagine cases like this will jump 200%. People with guns do stupid things.
1 likeThere’s so many famous Florida cases. This ones in my home city where I still live
0 likes" it hurts where he pushed me " ok? you just shot someone.
1 likeI truly understand his point of view I dont think its racially charged at all I think hes a good guy who was genuinely scared and that arm crunching pain is enough to daze anyone. I'm not saying he should have pulled the trigger or hes innocent but honest to god the guy probably was in.shock considering he kind of just stands there dead focused as if his life literally depended on it. Him deciding to fire is his mistake outside of that people aren't breaking down his story and giving credit where credit is due.
0 likesReplies (3)
i agree, obv you can look at the footage with hindsight and say he shouldnt of pulled the trigger, but with the adrenaline and the heat of the moment i can understand why he would still pull said trigger.
1 like@ImFresh agreed I just hate how people immediately attacked him as the worst it could be in the comments. It seemed several people ignorantly just assumed it was racial even though it genuinely doesn't seem that way.
1 likeRacially charged? Probably not. Some suburban commando who has no one to blame but himself for the consequences of his actions? Absolutely.
0 likesThis man threatened people with a gun in road rage incidents 4 times prior to this shooting. Not the type of person who should be allowed to carry a firearm with them.
Too many jittery, weak and feeble minded people are allowed to carry a gun
1 likeHuh that’s interesting. He was Sentenced on the same day as I was born (10th october) not the same year ofc
1 likeDrejka seems like a typical Kid Rock fan.
2 likesThank you for telling me he says. No remorse.
0 likes1. You have to be respectful towards everyone and follow the rules
2 likes2. You can't be reinforcing the rules because you are not a police
3. Don't bring violence to a discussion and ovoid doing stupid shit
If you’re being interrogated and the cop says “I’m just trying to understand…” you’re basically fucked.
0 likesI know if you want talk to law enforcement you're risking rights
0 likesReminds me of that guy that fired into a car full of teens because their music as too loud. killing one claiming self defense.
2 likesReplies (1)
That's Michael Dunn
1 likeLol he really wanted to be a police or something they rejected him 🤣
0 likesProsecution really said "but can u fight?"
0 likesTotally avoidable situation, lives ruined over a trivial matter.
0 likesthe dude said he couldnt see a change in the events that played out
1 like"force multiplier" bro thought he had a power up card
2 likesThis is a self-appointed-vigilante type of situation. He probably at one point harboured dreams and aspirations of joining the police or army. Clearly took it upon himself to seek out those he perceived as wrong-doers and threaten them with his 'firearm'. His use of police jargon is annoyingly evident of this.
2053 likesReplies (33)
I agree with you. He seems so prepared with his answers it’s actually quite worrying. However he’s not smart enough to understand that assumptions do not get you off a present sentence.
81 likesRight. A reasonable person would go inside and report it to management.
37 likesYeah, I think you nailed it.
11 likes@Mel Does Stuff yes when in reality hes the bad guy
12 likesStrikes me as the law enforcement/military obsessed (but not actually a trained member of those groups) type that is far too trigger happy. Probably watches tons of self defense videos on YT and fantasizes about himself getting in those situations so he can play hero. A legit danger to society when someone has that mindset
33 likes@what That wouldn't do. He wants to show them what they should be doing. He knows they wouldn't do what he does.
1 likeHe should be in jail…. But the black dude who shoved him was a moron as well. You don’t just immediately shove someone to the ground who’s in the middle of a disagreement. Weird reaction by both men here.
10 likes@Tommy Mc idk I dont think the black guy is a moron because the video did state the disagreement was so loud they could hear the both of them from within the store. The dude was mad this wannabe was yelling at his lady like that
14 likes@Jesley Peralta Doesn’t matter man you don’t just run up and shove someone to the ground because they are yelling at each other…. Doing that is idiotic and immediately escalates any situation.
8 likes@Tommy Mc it does matter. I guess you’d be just fine with some random man screaming at your wife in front of your kids though, right?
16 likes@Marcus Wodstrup Exactly. Guy didn’t have to shove him, was acting like a hot head. Sadly the man he shoved was clearly a psycho
2 likes@what Not everyone can get right jn. Medical keeps a bunch out. Laziness. You name it.
1 likewell said
0 likesSo true or false? He was assaulted before he fired his weapon. Telling an asshole off because he/she is in a parking spot, meant for people with disabilities, is totally fine. More people should be doing that.
2 likesI couldn’t agree more. I believe when people like this begin using this jargon, they think this will put them on the same level as law enforcement. It really just makes them look like they’re looking for a reason to justify using a weapon.
0 likes"Legend in his own mind..."
1 likeWell put.
0 likesI just realised, imagine how many war crimes he would commit if he actually became a soldier. Civilian casualties would peak
2 likesSuch a tired take. I guess you disdain every security officer you see on the same grounds. Weak
0 likes“Neutralize the target” “That’s my store” the convenient store handicap parking spot police… owner of the store probably didn’t even know who this guy was before this day..
0 likes@Micmimi56
0 likesIt wouldn't matter as the US, Iran, China and a few other nice countries didn't ratify the ICC Treaty, so US soldiers are free to play as they wish.
Eerily reminds me in a slightly less macabre and sinister way of the Todd Kolhepp interview. He used all kinds of jargon and bragged about his "skills" in marksmanship etc... almost trying to play buddy-buddy with police and relate to them in some kinda tactical way. I find it super distasteful and vomit inducing lol 😅
0 likes@sinkingship5 then report them to the store management or something. Don't stand there and keep screaming at them like a goddamn barbarian. It won't solve anything. Also, being pushed to the ground doesn't justify shooting a man, especially when said man is backing off. Did you even watch the video? Why are you defending that wannabe vigilante?
1 likeI believe men should be built like men and should face up like a man instead of drawing up a weapon. Imagine Ronnie Coleman or Dexter Jackson standing there and arguing with someone. Would somebody dare to push them or be aggressive with them? However, if you're a pigeon shoulder, chicken leg specie arguing with someone's gal they'll most likely try to fry you up. Your only possible response is then to shoot and take somebody's life. Strange gun laws though btw in the US. I mean I wouldn't keep any weapon even if the Nemesis from Resident Evil gifts me a Rocket Launcher. Not because that I don't like weapons but rather because it is an affront to my manliness to carry one. The best motivation for bodybuilding for me is that when I go out on the streets people would think twice before getting physically confrontational.
0 likes@Hassan Tirmizi r/iamverybadass
0 likes@Kierra Shaw the worst thing about it all is that the murderer will never mature sufficiently to realize he was the bad guy. In his kiddie mind, he will always be the hero. He's probably already truly convinced himself that he would have been killed if he didn't fire.
1 likeThis is why we need guns off the streets. So little boys in old bodies don't go around murdering people this way.
@Tommy Mc shoving someone escalates the situation, but most people won't expect a gun to come out immediately
1 like@bigsmall246 yes exactly
0 likes@gabrielle roberts And who do you think would be the one getting charged if he hadn't had a weapon? You'd be singing a completely different tune right now.
1 likeYeah you shouldn't accept crap from people. But immediately putting your hands on someone for arguing about a parking spot is pretty stu pid.
First of all, they shouldn't even have been there. Its a disability spot, and there many other free spots. Secondly, he didn't physically threaten nor attack anyone. So you're still in the wrong and could be charged with assault for striking first. Thirdly, he probably didn't even know what was going on, but immediately resorted to violence.
The guy isn't justified for shooting (obviously), but none of them are in the right and none of them were innocent (except the kids). Fact is he initiated assault. What he got in return was way worse and totally unnecessary, but that doesn't somehow except it.
@Hassan Tirmizi lmao sounds like jon koppenhaver got himself a computer
0 likes@HELP!!! hOW dO InPUt uSeRnAMe? People arent saying he was justified in shoving or that it wouldn't have been assault. Granted the man was shouting at his parter and there was kids in the car, so that could be considered some kind of justification, although he should have used his words first. But the fact that your trying to in any way say that him being shot was a reaction to his assault is INSANE. Was it assault, yes. Would he have been in the wrong had police shown up and no gunshot fired? Yes. Would he have got a misdemeanor assault charge (50$ fine) yes. Is there any possible situation where michael whatever his last name is was justified in ANY WAY to fire a gun and kill a man? NO FUCKING WAY. You are victim blaming. And its not okay.
0 likes@Lucas Booth Me: "The guy wasn't justified in shooting him (obviously) they were all in the wrong".
0 likesYou: *accused me of trying to justify the culprit and victim blame*.
Gee, and here I thought literally spelling it out and it saying it in the most clear way possible would convey my intention but nope.
@Lucas Booth "People aren't saying he was justified"
0 likesI can literally point you to a threas where someone tried to argue the guy was justified. And its not the only thread either. In fact, this very same thread is doing that.
So on top of putting words in my mouth (words which I literally preficed against), you say no one is justifying him when the literal comment I'm replying to is saying "Its justified cause he was screaming at his spouse".
I can't tell if you're confused or intentionally being dishonest at this point but I'm leaning towards the latter.
Lmao he's all acting like his arm hurts at first then when they leave he clearly forgot about and is leaning on it and right when they come back all of a sudden it's back to hurting and can't shake hands with it. He must not know he's being video taped...
0 likesso nice to see how he digs his own grave
1 likeImagine getting pushed, and thinking the logical course of action was to pull out a pistol and shoot
4 likesReplies (6)
Ignoring the guy who started the physical altercation? Course, we never can hold them to the same standard…
0 likes@NFAisNFGAY You can't respond to any and every physical assault with deadly force, especially if you're the one who provoked the confrontation by threatening a man's family.
1 like@Herbert West threatening? Seriously? You really don’t want to hold those people to the same standard. Guess they’re naturally that easily violent. No wonder people carry guns to defend from them, then.
0 likes@NFAisNFGAY If the verbal exchange occurs in such a manner as to make one fear for their safety, it's assault. He's standing at her door. He has her trapped in the car as he's berating her. His verbal barrage was sufficient to draw the attention of a customer who exited the store and then just sat in her car as well as the two drivers who pulled in AFTER the exchange started.
1 likeIf a cop had been there Drejka would have been instructed to walk away and, had he not, he would have been arrested for assault.
Legally: the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim.
@NFAisNFGAY I think the racial element was definitely overblown in this case (as it is in many cases today), but even without it, there was still enough evidence against Drejka to support his conviction.
0 likesMarquis and his wife were no angels. I have no doubt that she mouthed off to Drejka, and the shove from Marquis was pretty excessive. I think Marquis could've gotten within 10 feet, shouted at Drejka while marching towards him and it would've made him back off.
However, once Marquis shoved Drejka down... and Drejka subsequently removed his gun.... the gun itself was obviously a deterrent to any further escalation of the incident ... because Marquis backed up at the point the gun was drawn. The drawn gun and Marquis backing up was supposed to end this situation. It is IMPOSSIBLE to make the case that a man, who is backing up at the sight of a gun, is a threat to the person with the gun. The gun should have served as the "end-all" to the situation.
The bottom line is though that there never would've been any confrontation had Drejka minded his own business. He wasn't disabled himself. He didn't pull up to a full parking lot with his disabled mother and then politely ask someone without a placard to park somewhere else, he was a serial pest that was looking for a confrontation and a reason to use his gun.
@Herbert West can’t wait for someone to have the same energy defending them when one of them does something to you.
0 likesThat lawyer should just go home and retire. He just looked like such a jackass
1 likeI can't legally purchase a firearm but if I were to pull out any weapon because I feel threatened, if they put their hands up and back away im backing away too. I don't want to hurt you but if you give me a reason to I probably will lmao.
1 likeAs the old saying goes "I don't want NO SMOKE". It sucks that sometimes we have to because people are....ya know.
This person on the other hand is clearly a coward who's pride caused another person to lose their life.
44:33 that womens expression says everything
0 likesDrawing a gun is expected to kill or to be killed
2 likes10:26 the attacker must be within 21 feet to be considered inside the splash zone
0 likesGuy's been watching too many "Active Self Protection' clips...
1 likePoor man’s Paul Blart. Have fun in prison clown.
1 likeOh but yeah, second amendment, every ass in the street should have a firearm to defend themselves. Right.
1 likeGee guess he hasn't ever seen interrogation videos before .... He's obviously putting on the act for detectives while they're in the room. Two seconds before they entered the room his arm looked perfectly fine . What a pathetic human being
0 likesThe people taking the offenders side are the same people that think the “Reid” technique is based on science
0 likesKilling someone for pushing you is crazy
1 likeI thought that was not supposed to be any firearms in the interrogation room. Note that the office is wearing his.
0 likesI'm starting to think that detectives and interrogators have the highest IQ. Is it the training or they are just gifted?
0 likesReplies (1)
they're just trained to keep people talking. most of it is just being non threatening and backing off when they're getting to a sore spot. buddy buddy. even just sitting in the room like they are is an act.
1 likeWhy did he agree to questioning? Isn't it general consensus by now with all these videos and tv shows that you're better off never saying anything and waiting for a lawyer to represent you?
0 likesYou can just see this guys lawyers face when the prosecution is talking to the jury @50:22 he's like yea man it's over . I know we bout to lose
0 likes"with this kind of doubt in this case" sir there isn't any doubt lmfao, tf is he going on about
0 likesTook ambulance 19 minutes to arrive? Thats a long time
2 likesAre we not going to talk about how fucked up it is, that paramedics took 19 minutes to get there? What a mess.
1 likeI'm not 1/3 through the video, and I haven't reached a conclusion as of culpability (yet). But sweet baby Jesus!, after you've been mirandized, why do you keep talking?!? I'm guessing (fairly certain) that he's going down.
0 likes"That's my store, I'm there every day. Plain and simple."
0 likesNot saying he should've shot him or argued with the mother after circling her car, but what is the correct response when someone illegally parks in a handicap spot? If they could leave in just 30 seconds never to be seen by you again, just to park somewhere else illegally in a handicap spot, are you just supposed to take their license plate number and report it or is it even treated like a law? I personally hate when people do this as I have an elderly grandmother who has to use a walker and needs the space that sometimes isnt given by selfish individuals. Please give clarity someone
0 likesThis is a interrogating detective's dream....accused answering every question like it's nothing and embellishing it with all the details....proud as a peacock.
411 likesReplies (7)
I got the impression he genuinely thought the guy had stepped towards him and so he was in the right and that's why he was co-operating
17 likes@Syed Hasan Ali Mahdi well done on completely missing my point. I'm saying that he seemed to believe the story he was telling the police and that's why he was so quick to answer all the questions and didn't ask for a lawyer etc
10 likes@Dean King Gotta remember that almost all the people on this channel don't believe in innocent until proven guilty, and only believe evil exist and not stupidity/muddled memories and perception. They've never had to be interrogated under stress and don't know what remembering under stress does to your perception, probably wouldn't be able to describe their breakfast if you asked them at noon while they're stressed.
5 likes@Lala Baba Pretty darn stupid indeed to discharge your gun at an unarmed man. Doesn't make him innocent though
10 likesHe had his training... If you are carrying, the first rule of conduct if you are confronted by anyone is to inform them that you are carrying a firearm. This includes everyone that have any kind of "confrontation", which includes bystanders, and Law Enforcements.
What do you do when you get stopped by a traffic cop and you're carrying? Inform them that you are carrying
What do you do when someone is throwing hands at you when you're carrying? Inform them that you are carrying
You do not reach for it until you are in an immediate threat and danger to your life. That's what cops are also supposed to do when they need to pull out their gun, also that is why you shouldn't holster your gun somewhere hard to reach like tucked on the back of your pants, always holster them in an easily reachable but secure place. Falling down to the pavement because you were pushed by an unarmed dude is not a threat to your life.
Just saying anyway, it's a fine assesment in your end about testimonies. But the act is clear as day
@Syed Hasan Ali Mahdi No, you just haven't read up on the case. I read about those incidents, and even the cops themselves say that only two of those times was he said to have pulled a gun, and both those times the "victim" didn't press charges and he was released immediately. The other two times no one claimed he pulled a gun, and he was immediately released on both those times as well. You're so happy to paint this guy as some bad guy without even knowing all the facts. And yeah, it won't help. But I can still point out this subversion of justice. I feel bad for the US if this is their version of "justice".
1 like@Alien Tree Guy He was not "tackled to the ground". He was pushed BIG difference. You're trying to paint this guy as the victim when he's not. This guy saw someone parked in the handicapped parking spot (which someone shouldn't do if they're not handicap) and thought he should play cop instead of inform the store he was at. Him circling their car and arguing with someone's wife she was probably scared of him at that moment. And this guy rightfully so saw a guy yelling at his wife and pushed him down. Backing away, the other guy pulled out his gun and started shooting. How are you fearful of someone backing away? A handicapped spot shouldn't end someones life. And like someone prior said he was supposed to inform him that he was carrying which he didn't.
2 likes@Alien Tree Guy i don't see the point of having to yell and intimidate someone because of them parking on the wrong slot. He knows there's a kid with the woman. He shouldn't have yelled at her, nor acted like a cop/body guard/storemanager when he isn't in the first place. Letting them know they are in the wrong parking space IS ENOUGH. Walking away, informing the store would be better. Also the store have cctv's right? If they didn't give a damn about a stupid parking space, why would he be so triggered out of something he wouldn't be fined for? I also want to point out that when this guy was pushed to the ground, the moment the one who pushed him back down, it just means he did it out of father instinct, trying to protect his family, He saw a random guy, yelling to his wife and kids. He didn't have any weapon with him that could threaten his life enough to SHOOT the gun. The moment he pointed the gun, the father stopped, so what the shooting is for?
0 likesHere’s a quote after Drejka was sentenced to 20 years from Markeis’s father: “In the Bible, it says that in order to get into heaven we must forgive those who trespass against us. At this point in my life, I am not there yet. And if it just so happens that the Lord chooses to take me before I come to terms with this, then I will see you in hell, where you and I will finish this. Mark my words.”
0 likesReplies (1)
Here's a quote from Joe Biden: hairy legs
0 likesYou get inro altercation that is none of your bussiness, you get pushed to the ground you draw your gun. Okay. The one who pushed you takes two steps back. WTF are you thinking that you shoot him ? ..... The threat has stopped. Get up and gtfo.
0 likesFollow the law and this wouldn’t have happened
0 likesSeems like a good guy moral of the story is don’t go around shoving people to the ground
3 likesReplies (2)
true, adrenaline in the heat of the moment. i dont think he meant to kill but when ur surprised and look up to see a bigger man, who already resorted to violence, its understandable why he could pull the trigger.
0 likesIf you let some stranger harass the mother over your children over a parking dispute, you’re a wuss
0 likesI like how he turned his jacket into a sling for his arm. He must have leveled up his field medic skill to level 10 to unlock that perk.
723 likesReplies (8)
carlwinslo hahahaha so true
11 likesLove that name too
You watching out for Urkel?
Miraculously "healed" at 1:17 :00 timestamp🤔
21 likesMedicine +5
9 likesthat is a regeneration multiplier right there
9 likesMy favorite comment in this section
2 likesSame hand he shot with as well
5 likesBest comment
0 likesThat was the first thing I noticed.
1 likeThese dude kill me they creat a situation then claim to be victims ,mind your damn business problem solved
0 likesHe illegally parked to kill someone who was illegally parked.
8 likesMarkeis McGlockton (drug dealer) won't be attacking people in parking lots anymore and the gun happy Michael Drejka is off the streets. A win-win situation. Too bad the didn't ticket the girlfriend.
1 likeShooting a man over a parking violation that is none of your business?
5 likesReplies (3)
He murdered the guy after he was physically attacked. Still not justified in my opinion but come on the guy who got shot behaved poorly aswell.
0 likes@Root Beer Did he though? I mean sure, going immediately for a push to the ground is not right, but his girlfriend was getting yelled at by some old sack o' bones. Of course he would go and intervene. To me, this case is 1% the guy getting a bit to aggressive with the push and 99% that old nut-job just wanting to roleplay a cop or a GTA character so bad he was willing to shoot someone and go to jail over it.
0 likes@Mitko Donchev Is physically assaulting someone in response to and verbal altercation warranted because there was a women involved or are you virtue signalling?Stunning and brave. Had he walked up and said sorry we where in a rush man do you think the "sack of bones" would still have shot him? If the colour of their skin was reversed would you call the black guy a "sack of bones"? Just being devils advocate here i feel both parties acted poorly and infront of children.
0 likesI've seen a lot of people talk about this but I want to clarify that the altercation was over when Michael drew the gun, the father backed up when he saw the gun. Yes the father should not have pushed him, but his wife was being yelled at, and he made a decision to push Michael in the moment. That however is not enough justification to shoot some who is unarmed and backing up.
345 likesReplies (28)
You can tell who grew up in bama snacking on their sister based on who thinks who was wrong in this video
14 likesYes I’m honestly quite shocked at the people defending Michael. I won’t even say it’s bias (although it’s obvious it runs deep) - it’s just blind ignorance. God help me if I ever marry a man who doesn’t defend me - or a man who gets aggressive with women and then feels justify shooting his way out when confronted about it. Michael is a weak man. How do people not see this? A really statement about society.
22 likesYou guys know they can both be in the wrong, right? Yelling at women isn't cool. Neither is pushing people for yelling.
16 likes@Becky Clawson so, both of these "men" are weak. Correct.
3 likes@Wabi Sabi my wife would lock the door and call me to handle it. She knows better.
3 likesHe was not raising his hands. I watched the video specifically looking for that - he started to back up when Drejka reached for the gun, and was in the middle of turning away when he got shot, but he never threw his hands up. You know you don’t need to lie to make Drejka look like the bad guy right? The case was pretty clear cut without lying about how innocent the victim was, or the erroneous insinuation of racism. The shooter’s response was still obviously way past the point of being justifiable in any case.
8 likes@Maddock Emerson correct. Both are in the wrong.
1 like@Maddock Emerson 1. Don't play handicapped parking police.
8 likes2. Don't yell at women.
3. If you are a woman dealing with a threat that you can't physically overcome. Go somewhere safe and be smart.
4. Violence is a last resort. Period.
5. If you can't argue with the handicapped police with no badge I don't know what to say to you.
6. People are crazy. If you put your hands on them, expect the worse.
@Maddock Emerson You are correct, I'm sorry I made that mistake I genuinely thought I saw that he did, I'll edit the comment
2 likes@Becky Clawson Becky was never raised in the hood and has no experience there. I guarantee it.
2 likes@Homunkulus you better handle that $hit and disarm him if you push him. It's game on once it gets physical.
2 likesIt wasn’t just a push. He dropped him to the concrete.
4 likes@Choose Your Own Path he pushed him and the push caused him to fall over, he didn't push him to the ground, Michael just fell over because he wasn't expecting it
2 likes@Choose Your Own Path completely agree with you. Im just more experienced with this than the average person. The system is in their favor. I don't get any heat in the hood out of respect.
0 likes@RabbitFangs Understandable. I just kinda unloaded here (no pun intended) because I saw a lot of comments playing up the innocence of the victim as if he were completely blameless, when he did assault the soon-to-be murderer just for being rude.
0 likes@Homunkulus what world do you live where it's ok to get physical with someone who isn't threatening you with physical violence?
1 like@RabbitFangs oh yeah it's like saying "I didn't kill him, the bullet did". Shameful attempt at justifying violent actions of a not so bright man.
1 likeOne man made a decision " in the moment" and then the man he assaulted also made a decision "in the moment". Funny how everyone can see this as a black and white issue when quite frankly it's gray at best.
1 likeOnly a dangerously violent person would react the way he did to an argument. He is the one who instigated the violence.
0 likesMike started an argument. That is no reason for starting a physical aggression. Furthermore, he could have been killed had he fell wrong on the concrete floor.
People die all the time from falling wrong. His reaction was 100% justified to a life threatening aggression.
It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself but at least he got rid of that animal. (whoever resorts to violence in an argument is an animal).
@Michael Zomsuv I was with you up until you said the reaction was 100% justified. Drejka's reaction was not a defense against an assault that was ongoing, but a retaliation to an assault that ended a solid moment before the shot.
1 likeI've been there, in a situation where I felt so threatened by a large and unreasonably aggressive man that I drew a weapon. I used it to warn him as I backed off. And that guy continued being aggressive after I drew the weapon. Fortunately I didn't have to use it, and I didn't because I saw that I didn't need to. That guy was more bark than bite. Point is, I didn't get that solid moment to think before acting, and I still didn't resort to killing or even wounding.
Meanwhile, Drejka had two seconds to get his bearings and realize that he was no longer in immediate danger. He had a moment to think, and then he shot the already-defeated opponent who was visibly retreating. The only way this could be clearer was if the victim was shot in the back.
"but his wife was being yelled at"
4 likesI don't know why people keep saying this. They were not married. She was just his baby momma. She had three kids by him, all under six. Which means she was squeezing out puppies as fast as possible to keep her welfare checks padded and arriving on schedule.
@Don Miller lol, I don't know about that, but one thing is sure is that "being yelled at" is not an excuse for shoving someone on a concrete floor. Only an animal would react that way to an argument.
1 likeWell only animals would kill someone for being pushed, was the pushing unnecessary yes but did he deserve to die? No and definitely not infront of the mother of his child and his kids. Do you realize how traumatizing that is? High school kids push each other alot for stupid reasons does that mean they are animals? Does that mean they should die? He did not deserved to be killed. The LEAST u could do is to respect the dead man not calling me an animal and mind you that's the very LEAST you could do. He did not deserve to die. If you believe other wise then I strongly Suggest you never purchase a gun cuz with you're mindset you could kill a human being for the simple case of him or her pushing. Of course this is just a suggestion do with it as you wish thank you and hopefully someday you realize how disturbing this comment was and grow up. Take care
1 like@Michael Zomsuv oh so pushing someone is animal behavior but not killing someone, makes perfect sense
1 like@Axel Agree. Definitely did not warrant lethal aggression, however.
0 likesConcretely put; violence was not necessary, even if it’s a very natural response to these situations. After being pushed and falling onto the pavement, the officer had clear time to make a decision as the perpetrator disengaged. The officer then made a conscious choice to shoot the disengaging perpetrator.
To say that pushing a man for an argument is wrong should subsequently be to say that Shooting a man for a push is wrong. Racial bias or otherwise, This comment section needs a desperate cleanse of double standard syndrome.
@c2.whitty That is definitely true too. As someone who does conceal carry, he was completely in the wrong. You only use a firearm if you are in fear for your life and you should never even think about touching it if you are angry. This is what is taught to those who are issued CCWs. This douche gives level headed gun owners a bad reputation. As soon as the initial attacker backed off after seeing the gun, this situation went from self defense to murder.
0 likes@JenEx high school kids are kids.. adults have to know better. Not justifying murder. But an adult can’t shove another man like that. That was a violent assault.
0 likes@FlymanMS no, I live right next to the hood. I don't play weed smoking police either because it's none of my business.
0 likesImagine the kids life after witnessing your own father die infront of you jesus
0 likesThis guy was low key excited to execute a black man let's be real. How are you gonna say you've never been in a fight and over someone pushing you, the immediate response is pulling out + gun and firing?
0 likesPLEASE KEEP MAKING VIDEOS JCS
0 likesNew imidiatly he was guilty when he started faking the injury haha
0 likesIf you pull a gun and they back away, then the gun has served its purpose. Shooting them at that point is just murder.
17431 likesReplies (358)
Actually I heard that pulling a gun without the intent to use it is illegal. Haven't read it anywhere just heard.
570 likesEdit: Aight guys, I get it, brandishing a firearm with the purpose of warding off an attacker is justified.
1 or 2 seconds isn't enough time to reassess the situation and decide that the threat no longer exists, especially right after being blindsided and dazed with a cowardly violent attack. The dead thug was hiking up his pants and advancing toward the victim to continue his violent assault, and only stopped after he saw the gun. That gun saved the victim's life. It's our crap INJUSTICE system that is in the wrong here.
336 likes@J T it didn't save his life it saved him from a beating at most
1493 likes@J T Pulling the gun saved him from a beating. Shooting the guy did nothing but get him pulled into a homocide investigation. I've been attacked randomly on the street as well. Your ability to reason does not magically disappear.
1551 likesHe's at gunpoint. You can shoot in a fraction of a second if he starts coming at you again or makes a move that looks like he's going for a weapon. It's not about how far he has walked away, it's about the fact that he is actively retreating from you. This means that you're in control of the situation at that point, and if that changes you can pull the trigger. And to address some other comments, I have been assaulted multiple times. Once I was attacked by four people in the middle of the street. Your ability to reason does not disappear. There is a reason that using deadly force in self-defense legally requires a legitimate fear for your life. A person actively backing away from you does not justify use of deadly force, even if they did push you down beforehand. If they are retreating then pulling the gun has worked to stop the attack. You are now in control of the situation. Unless that changes, there is no legally justifiable reason to shoot them at that point. This is not my opinion about the situation, it is my interpretation of self-defense laws in America.
727 likes@Geordie 1974 Oh haha my bad, I read it the other way.
13 likes@KillSpawn47 no I agree 1000% percent, and I know my response sounded immature. I think as humans we've become desensitized to human life. We watch ppl die on a daily basis, wether it be through movies, games , youtube. What I saw was a man attacking a man yelling at his wife . And the minute the "Victim" points the gun at him you clearly, CLEARLY see my mans backing up lol. If he lunged forward after he pulled out the gun, then I can understand . All human life is precious.
226 likes@Cliff Nasa absolutely.
26 likesThe guy was assaulted. He was pushed and fell to the ground. A firearm is a deadly force level of force. It is to be used in a deadly force situation. Once the guy pushed him to the ground he didn't continue to advance. There was no risk of death. He had no reason to pull his firearm and even less to fire it.
396 likes@꧁ ꧂ question, if you come from the store and you see someone yelling at your wife how would you react?
199 likes@J T A shove is what you get for meddling in affairs that are not your problem. Michael had absolutely no reason to argue with someone about something as insignificant as a missing handicap pass. I hope ur joking around.
296 likes@Amina Ballerina I don't have a wife, but also I'm not sure what you're getting at. I never said anything about whether I thought the initial push was justified or not. All I said is that it's not self defense to shoot someone who is retreating.
135 likesWrong but whatever you think
2 likes@Wowzapalooza I get it. I can sort of understand the pulling of the firearm for self defense. It might be a bit of a stretch though. But I agree the shooting was definitely not justified. He shoved him and was not advancing. The guy on the ground had time to see he was not advancing (although I understand time dilation in a high stress situation could impact his perception.) But once the gun was out, the other guy was clearly retreating. The guy on the ground had time to realize that and decide NOT to shoot.
41 likes@Wowzapalooza How can you be pro gun when things like this happen? What is so unique about the US that the average person needs a gun when all other countries around the world manage without? We still have to deal with our fair share of killings but it eliminates your average confrontation like this, from escalating.
68 likes@Amina Ballerina The shove wasn’t justified. It’s defined as battery, a crime. But shooting an unarmed man backing away is murder. Agreed? I understand that shoving someone arguing with your spouse might feel justified or relatable. And it doesn’t justify being murdered. I’m not saying that the victim bears any responsibility, not in anyway. As we know, the whole thing was instigated by the self appointed parking lot monitor. Just the same, the shove wasn’t legally justified—if the man hadn’t been killed, he might have faced his day in court.
82 likes@Alexander D You can pull a gun out legally if you feel you are threatened for your life (and can definitively prove this when/if it comes down to that). It is illegal to threaten someone with a firearm, or to "brandish" a firearm implying you have a firearm as a means of intimidation.
24 likes@J T saved his life? Bro, he pushed him and started to back away. He wasn’t showing any other signs of advancing on him. He should not have pushed him, but he was not going to end the murder’s life.
83 likes@Take a Picture it'll last Longer clearly not because he was walking away after pushing him
3 likesI mean, reaction times are an important factor, I think it was justified to pull the gun, but the guy backed away and he shoulda made a retreat. The father was mad, and truth be told he should not have pushed Mike over, that's assault, but he pushed him and then backed up, and then Mike should have seen that and not shot.
50 likesI get things can get hot when someone disrespects your woman. But there were bad things on both sides, very bad decisions, Mike especially. He was justified until he pulled the trigger.
@John Smith Exactly how I feel about it.
3 likesYeah pulls a gun guy runs. Job done. Guy runs and gets his gun. Now someone is dying lol.
6 likesPerfectly stated. So sad and difficult to watch. :((
2 likes@NicoNick ok????
8 likes@Monique L "How can you be pro gun when things like this happen?" - This really is a rare event. Think of the amount of times people have properly and effectively used guns to defend themselves. The numbers are hard to get just because a gun can be anything from simply pulling, to shooting and missing but enough to deter them, to shooting and them surviving, shooting and killing. Its estimated around 500,000- 2 million cases where firearms protect someone.
26 likesYour also ignore the main reason that it exists is because its a deterrent for a tyrannical government. Its very difficult to suppress your people when they have a means to fight back. Every case of a tyrannical government that succeeded first disarmed their people and you can't sit there and say that the American government wouldn't ever become tyrannical because they are human and can still be corrupted.
@Honest Jim Reading these comments is honestly turning me anti-gun in a general sense, and I've rarely felt like that. What I'm seeing here is a disturbing trend of people that think it's justifiable to escalate a fist fight situation to a murder. Shit like this happens all the time. A pissed off guy at a bar punches someone from behind who is hitting on their girlfriend, etc. Millions of times a year. That doesn't justify an escalation to gun use unless they're taking out a knife/gun/blunt object/or specifically vocalizing intent to kill or taking it beyond a typical man on man fight.
57 likes@Ellie Baker He was backing away for less than 2 seconds, which is not enough time for his victim to decide that he is no longer threat, after just being blindsided and dazed by a sudden violent assault. Right before he started backing away, he was hiking up his pants and advancing toward the victim, getting ready to continue violently assaulting and possibly killing him. THis shoot was 100% justified. The victim should not be in jail. The dead thug got what he had coming.
13 likes@J T "The dead thug was hiking up his pants and advancing toward the victim to continue his violent assault, and only stopped after he saw the gun." Nah fam, you are just racist. If they guy DID back away the gun served it's purpose
84 likes@Obedient Drone lol so u agree with my guy in this video?? He doesnt deserve to be in jail, so that what you're saying. My opinion on guns has nothing to do with this case
0 likes@Alexander D so it’s better to fucking use it?
1 like@Cliff Nasa I think part of it is these softies see shooting someone as a way to hit back. I had a old guy pick a fight with me once and when I stood my ground he want and got a gun. Im probably lucky he didnt have it on him and had to beg the old guy not to shoot me once he retrieved the firearm. His parting words were I may not be able to fight but I can still shoot.
11 likes@J T I carry every day you're wrong to think that shooting was justified. 2 seconds is a LIFETIME during an altercation. You get tunnel vision and things slow down. He was laser focussed on the guy and knew he backed up. He gave him enough time to back up several feet
44 likesCouldn't agree more. Absolutely no reason to shoot if the guy is backed away. He got what he wanted a shove, the guy was on the ground end of. But the other guy had to shoot him coz he lost that altercation. I hate how he was complaining about his arm when that guy is dead.... He has no remorse!
15 likesI think they're both in the wrong, they were only having an argument over a parking spot and then he got tackled to the ground, but then Michael shouldn't have shot, that was an unneeded decision.
13 likes@Alexander D doubt that
0 likes@steelguitarboy wym?
0 likes@steelguitarboy Because I don't make YouTube videos, obviously.
1 like@Mike2014 PS every single gun training class you get bombarded with the phrase "never look for an altercation."
38 likesWhat do you call playing parking lot police with random people on a property you don't own?
@Monique L ok and where there isnt guns there are acid attacks,stabbings,bludgeoning,strangulation, etc
8 likes@Not a great name your getting checked if your arguing with some dudes SO while theyre sitting in their car
2 likes@J T no, the word thug was made to be used against black people. It has always been like this. A black criminal is called a thug, a white criminal is called a criminal. Its like a murderer getting told hes a murderer because hes standinh on the dead body, and he says because they assume that a dead body means a murder has happened, the accuser is the murderer
16 likes@Joseph Moncada I didn’t say that murder doesn’t happen but in your everyday encounter like this, it doesn’t escalate to this, because normal people are not armed. This was a simple argument that people get into, its natural but within a society where carrying a gun is legal things can get out of control a lot easier. If you are carrying any other type of weapon it is illegal and is therefore far less common.
4 likes@Mike2014 oh really? So because a bunch of proffesionals deem this guy guilty, its obv because its a race issue? Your worrying about the wrong aspect of race buddy. This guy also illegally parked, and started verbally assualted the women. Hes a thug and the black couple were fearing for their safety so he was attacked
7 likes@Monique L acid attacks are still very frequent, and just as fast as getting shot. They literally run past you as they huck acid on you. Guns are not the problem. Black markets cannot all be stopped so to put efforts in tackling the existence of guns is fruitless
5 likes@Joseph Moncada Acid attacks are rare in western countries, I’m comparing the US to Europe, which has high levels of economic and political stability. Western countries are no way near as violent as the US. People are relatively comfortable, there is support for people of all social backgrounds and there is not a need to carry weapons in a high functioning society.
9 likes@Monique L thats literally propoganda. Like me saying that if you move over here your guaranteed a life of riches and prospect
1 like@Joseph Moncada It’s not propaganda, I’m just wondering why the US is so unique from most other countries where your average person wants or feels the need to be armed in order to solve problems. Societies that are equally as violent as the US tend to be poverty stricken, unstable countries.
7 likes@J T what a fantastic rebuttal
11 likes@Spring Bloom "mechanical process" except hes not a machine. Hes a human. A human who was trying to live a fantasy as a hero who defended himself. You are right on one thing tho. This man decided on the ground that he was going to shoot him. Regardless of him fully realizing he is backing up. He wants to end this story as a hero
4 likes@Spring Bloom excellent rebuttal
0 likes@Spring Bloom and all the credibility is thrown out the window in you saying this guy couldnt have stopped himself from shooting
1 like@J T the only victim is the man and his family
10 likesprobally would of never said anything without it
0 likes@J T He illegally parked to complain about her illegal parking, there should not have been an altercation between them in the first place. Our justice system worked perfectly in this instance. I don’t believe the family was completely in the right either but he didn’t need to kill that man.
20 likes@J T i actually agree on that one. i mean yeah its not good that he killed him, but that was clearly self defense AND way to less time to asses the situation, whats going on after being blindsided and maybe that guy would also have the gun?he clearly didnt mean to kill anybody.i dont know about the judge decision whether he should get a jail time or no, its really difficult case in my opinion. i would say ok, if he gets a jail time, it should be no more than 3-5years with a chance to get out earlier.
1 like@fasfan I agree with not shooting, i'm however fine with him pulling out to stop the assault. the 'no reason' part is silly. He was on the ground, arm hurt and he lurched over him. I agree with the guy that said: after he backed off, the gun had served it's purpose and no shooting should have followed
3 likes@Amina Ballerina i'd try to defuse for one instance, and if that doesn't work, i'd leave. If things get physical, i'd defend myself and my family. The assault was not needed.
4 likes@AwoudeX I’m from the U.K. I can’t imagine a situation where I would need a gun. I can’t imagine many situations where I would be prepared to shoot anyone. I’d just rather call the authorities to deal with such matters.
7 likes@AwoudeX If my life is sheltered then I’m very grateful. The whole of Europe manages to live their life without guns. People don’t live their lives expecting the worse.
8 likesThere should be more pressure on your government to provide a safer environment for their citizens instead of trying to arm the general public. For someone to own a gun they need at least some military training. You could not arm somebody like me, who is emotional and can react out of fear in particular situations. Fear is subjective and is not grounds to shoot somebody which will likely result in death. Being threatened and being robbed of property isn’t grounds to take a human life.
I’m not a religious person but I’m just not prepared to have somebodies life on my back. I think you are naive in thinking you could kill somebody so easily. Normal people aren’t killers, no matter how justifiable the reason.
@Monique L
3 likesFirst of all, thanks for keeping things polite. Seems rare these days online regarding topics that have the potential to heat up quickly.
<<If my life is sheltered then I’m very grateful. The whole of Europe manages to live their life without guns. People don’t live their lives expecting the worse.>>
the worst? no, i don't live like that either. I however do reserve a level of being on guard when in unfamiliar places. Life has taught me this the hard way. It's different for women however, you do realise that, don't you? There's far less empathy towards men in general. 'safe the women and children first' in disasters or in hostage situations, the men apparently are expendable and to a degree, society is harder towards men this way.
Switzerland has a 40% or more gun ownership rate, is it part of Europa? Is Switzerland known for having problems with guns? The USA is a rather new experiment regarding individualism, it takes it to the extreme and from my perspective that more than anything else causes certain issues that are amplified when a force multiplier is at hand. My suggestion is to adress the issues and keep the guns and become more like Switzerland: guns but not the bad gun reputation.
<<There should be more pressure on your government to provide a safer environment for their citizens instead of trying to arm the general public.>>
The government is already way too big in most western countries and the tax burden is increasing over time. The system already is stretching beyond what's wise to do.
On top of that, i don't want a few people having more and more power. It's a recipe for future tyranny.
<<For someone to own a gun they need at least some military training.>>
Do you need to be able to drive a tank in order to get a driver's license too? Leave out the militairy, they train to kill potential enemies. I do agree however that a level of proficiency with guns can be demanded of gun owners. A mandatory practice at intervals to keep you sharp is not a bad thing either, just like we demand from armed cops.
<<You could not arm somebody like me, who is emotional and can react out of fear in particular situations. Fear is subjective and is not grounds to shoot somebody which will likely result in death.>>
If you say so, but is it reasonable for you to demand this of others because you personally aren't suited for carrying a gun? I rather foster responsibility instead of dependancy on government. Imagine an old lady in her 70's too afraid to go and walk her dog without a gun, but with she's comfortable because her bodily frailty is no longer part of the equation.
<<Being threatened and being robbed of property isn’t grounds to take a human life. >>
You have the right to defend your property and yourself. If a robber insist despite you aim a gun, then it's not on the victim of a robbery that a life was ended. I don't want to live in a society where i'm not allowed to defend myself and my property.
<<I’m not a religious person but I’m just not prepared to have somebodies life on my back.>>
I hope i never have to be in that situation, but i'll choose my own life over that of someone who's willing to risk it for some trinkets or money.
<<I think you are naive in thinking you could kill somebody so easily.>>
I think i'm capable but i also think it would scar me for life and still i think it's better than keeling over to crime and just let it happen.
<<Normal people aren’t killers, no matter how justifiable the reason.>>
Sure, but defending yourself does not equate to being a killer. Don't conflate these 2 things. Defending yourself also doesn't mean that you'll always fire the gun. A show of this force multiplier can be enough and that would be the ideal situation.
On top of that, criminals don't play fair, they will have guns wether they are allowed or not. At some level it's better that law abiding citizens at least have some measure of equal force to defend themselves, because cops 15 minutes away aren't going to stop their bullets.
@AwoudeX If you read my other comment you will see I did agree that an argument could be made for at least pulling his gun. I kind of go either way on that one. But I do not see the other guy continuing once he was on the ground. So the shooting is definitely unjustified. Especially when the guy was clearly withdrawing.
2 likes@fasfan yeah, i read that later, we're almost completely in agreement i see. Shoving him full force on the ground from a blind side is a low act and in my eyes proves you're a potential threat and that justifies the showing of a gun and firing if the assault continues. That threat was ended with a mere show of the gun however, as he clearly backed up. The guy then watches this happen and still shoots... If i had been on the jury i'd have voted guilty of manslaughter for sure.
3 likes@Murderificationism I'd expect it in many instances where a show of force makes an aggressor back down... Not always though. On top of that if you are carrying and get knocked out and the gun is discovered, it might be used against you, so better pull it when assaulted and hope it stops the agression without needing to fire it. By your reasoning if a cop aims, there should always be shooting and no de-escalation? What nonsense are you spewing here???
2 likesHe was just blind sided by a furious guy, and said guy stood there over him. I would have been dazed and really frightened. The shooter sounds careful and concerned about kids. If the furious one would have yelled at least, what is going on, that instead of threatening shove that put him on his back helpless.
0 likes@Sven the Bananaman I was also thinking that. Imagine you walk out of the corner store because you hear arguing and it ends up being some random stranger arguing with your wife. Although the argument shouldn’t have taken place at all, and the husband shouldn’t have completely shoved him to the ground I do understand why he reacted in a violent way. It shouldn’t have been taken to the next extreme by the man who pulled up to complain about their parking job.
2 likes@Sa DMS right humans always overreact
0 likes@J T In those exactly 2 and a half seconds all this guy thought was that he had better not miss his only chance at a free kill.
5 likesTrue
0 likes@Smoke Break MMA lol you're weird. Human life has become worthless overtime.
0 likesCliff Nasa take responsibility and accountability for your actions. That thug who got killed has to take responsibility for his actions, the same for the guy who shot him, he has to take responsibility for that.
0 likes@Smoke Break MMA of he didnt die I'm sure he would've, lol wtf.
1 like@Amina Ballerina you don’t run up and shove them from behind. That’s a coward move. Use your words and try to deescalate the situation. This was all egos.
0 likes@Alexander D if you pull it out to defend yourself then that is legal. If it turns out you dont have to use it then that doesnt make it illegal.
0 likesdoes anyone know if he was finally found guilty? I hope he'll rot in jail
0 likesThe white guy was the aggressor by starting a fight for absolutely no justifiable reason. The black guy was just defending his family from some random guy yelling at her. Therefore there isn't a single aggressive action he could take that would be justifiable. If you're the one being aggressive you do not have the right to self defence. You can't just pick fights and shoot somebody.
11 likesHim parking in a handicapped spot was none of that punks business and even if he was a cop, they would just get a ticket or a tow. That's literally it. There would be no argument.
This is how the confrontation should go even if he was a cop:
"Ma'am, are you aware you're parked in a handicapped space?"
"(No)Yes"
"(Well, you are and) You can't do that, it's against the law. You do it again and I'm gonna have to ticket you."
@J T yea to protect his family who were being harrased by a stranger with CHILDREN in the car! That father had every reason to believe that stranger was threat to his family!
7 likes@J T so the guy defending his wife is a thug but not the guy with the gun? What made the victim a "thug" if you don't mind me asking? Is it because he was intimidating? The shooter kept saying it was his store during the interrogation even though he was just a patron. That sounds more "thug" like to me but I could be wrong
10 likesAgreed!!!
0 likes@J T well Dreka was screaming and yelling at a woman and her kids....so he probably came out of the store and wanted to defend his wife and kids...Dreka isn't an officer or a parking attendant, what is his authority to approach someone and start and altercation? He could have called the police if illegally parked vehicle was an issue....he also mentioned that he sees this all the time and it's a pet peeve so why did he only approach this family????
7 likes@J T he stopped after he saw the gun, you just said it 😂so there was no reason to shoot.
3 likes@J T Words DO have a meaning and if someone is directing some bad ones towards your family and you sit there and do nothing then you would be considered "a pussy" . I think the white man was in the right to pull out his weapon because if not he was gonna end up beaten like my meat at the start of september but nothing justifies him shooting it. He killed a man and got sentenced the maximum amount. It was not self defense bcs when he had the gun in his hands he was already pretty well defended. Also 2.5 s is ALOT of time to make a reflex decision on this situation. Only by his first step back you already know you are very well safe. You can go watch the ending of the video bcs you havent aparently at least you havent interpreted what was said
1 like@Alexander D Not true. If there is not threat, it is called brandishing, which is a crime. With a threat, you may pull your gun, as a deterrent and a protection.
0 likes@Damjan Ilic Wanting revenge and taking a life are two different things. Wanting is not an action.
0 likes@Castle Training Group Escalating a lot, because the other guy was unarmed, but I guess it was still legal before he shot.
1 like@J T That was not a violent attack. lol
1 like@MarcosElMalo2 By Florida law, that "shove" did not rise to an assault charge.
2 likes@John Smith The shove was not assault, according to FL law.
3 likes@Ellie Baker Oh, it's bad. You have no idea. My state got rid of the requirement to take gun safety classes before getting a concealed carry license so everyone thinks they are justified in shooting someone else over the slightest grievance.
1 like@Honest Jim If you think your gun going up against the government, with all of its military might, is going to end well, then I wish you luck.
2 likes@J T Again, not a violent assault.
2 likes@Monique L Honestly, it's the 2nd amendment and how it's been interpreted, then the gun lobby scares people into thinking they need an arsenal and need to carry to go to the grocery and then top it off with a HUGE problem with mental health and, well, that's the United States of Gunmerica.
4 likesPeople that call themselves pro-life don't care about school shootings. It's pretty sick and sad.
@J T Ah, says the guy who no doubt supports the president with over 20,000 documented lies! You are PRICELESS! You should take your comedy routine on the road!
1 like@Joseph Moncada JT is a bit of a one-trick pony.
1 likeYeah guns save more lives than they take just by being brandished.
0 likes@Schmoopy Von Boopy Site your source. I don't know any place in the whole US where a shove isn't viable for an assault charge.
0 likes@Schmoopy Von Boopy You mean how the government has done so well in afganistan? Issue is that if you have to view then entire population as an enemy, then you aren't going to have many friends inside your own country. You don't fight on their terms as a large military might, but other means.
0 likes@Amina Ballerina You assess the situation, if no physical threat is immanent you step between the man and your wife. Calmly ask what is happening, and try to diffuse the situation.
0 likes@AllEy3s0nMe i’m sorry but if someone is harassing any of my family members i will react accordingly
1 likeYeah then you just brandished a firearm, a guns purpose is to shoot a target not intimidate a target
0 likesCorrect. The most significant part of self defense is that you are not pursuing another, and in most jurisdictions that you are also attempting to take evasive action.
1 likenot true. watch some police videos of police getting rushed after the person pretends to step back
0 likes@J T The fact that you called the dead man a thug doesnt sit right with me. You dont know the life he lived.
5 likesHow you gon tote a strap n not use it?
0 likesHow you gon tote a strap n not use it?
0 likes@J T “the violent assault” the man was screaming at his family and he pushed the guy to the ground, STOOD STILL, and the dude shoots him as he is backing up. That’s a violent assault? Seriously? Being PUSHED is not life threatening. No weapon, backing away once the gun was pulled, RETREATING. that’s murder. I know you probably own guns and that’s terrifying that you don’t even know that’s at the least manslaughter
8 likes@Smoke Break MMA okay bad ass!
1 likeCh3k420 never said I was bad ass but it doesn’t take a bad ass to defend yourself when thugs attack you.
0 likes@Smoke Break MMA so anyone that pushs someone for yelling at their family is a thug? what gives you the idea that this guy was a thug?
3 likeswell put
0 likese vj you obviously don’t know the laws. There is a law called self defense and there is a law called stand your ground. Stand your ground allows you to shoot them even if they are running away from you as long as you believe your life is in danger. Self defense once they run away you can’t shoot them because the threat is over. You don’t know the difference between the two
0 likesHe's not supposed to be making any kind of confrontations while carrying.
2 likesMitch Setterman 😂😂😂😂 he didn’t start anything. He sure ended it though
0 likes@Smoke Break MMA Lol he started a homicide investigation
2 likesSkiplock Fredo better than the thug in the dirt right?
0 likesPeople do things under stress/fear that they wouldn't normally do under normal conditions. Especially if they have not conditioned themselves to it through training. Even then nothing prepares you for the real thing. Once the adrenalin dump starts coursing through your veins your brain will want to do anything but think clearly. Heart rate shoots up, tunnel vision, auditory exclusion etc.. FIGHT OR FLIGHT! . All you see is what you may perceive as a viable threat coming at you. Some people just freeze. Unfortunately, for all involved, his brain under the influence of all of that adrenaline/fear told him that that man was a deadly threat and he had better defend himself and shoot before the gun is taken away and possibly used on him. Just my perspective/opinion of course. We can agree to disagree.
0 likesNah he did nothing wrong
0 likes@Alexander D Not true. You can brandish a weapon without using it if you believe you are at risk of serious bodily harm.
0 likesExactly. Brandishing a weapon is part one. This guy was unarmed (but still dangerous)..... and the situation didn’t warrant the guy wanting to inflict serious bodily harm. Even as a woman, unless he pulled out a knife or continued trying to assault me (randomly. I’m not stupid enough to start a fight), I would brandish and possibly fire depending on the severity of the situation. This guy was just looking for a fight and looking for a reason to use his gun. He was specifically looking for trouble, which is one of the biggest DON’Ts when you’re carrying a deadly weapon. Don’t look for trouble, and pray to God that trouble never looks for you.
3 likesMurder.
0 likes@J T 😂😂😂😂😂
0 likesSeriously!
0 likesYes! 👏🏽
0 likes@J T this is a bit late, but why have a gun if you are incapable of assessing a situation. If the purpose is to prevent/deter attackers from advancing, and you already have it on your persons, you should be mentally prepared to use it. Other wise what the purpose of the gun?
4 likesHow is he supposed to be sure he won’t be attacked again? You’re wrong and you’ve clearly never been in a situation like this.
0 likes@Blaine Klaus idk, maybe the fact that he can shoot in literally a fraction of a second if he comes at him again? I've been in much worse situations than this, getting pushed down outside of a gas station in broad daylight is really not that scary.
3 likes@Blaine Klaus He initiated the confrontation even though he “hasn’t been in a fight in his life” clearly stating he was planning on using a gun and careless of the safety of others and himself. he’s pathetic and shouldn’t have owned a gun he deserves to rot in prison
4 likesAlways been told, don't use a gun as muscle. If you pull it, use it
1 like@Alexander D I think it's more so gun safety, don't pull a gun unless you're going to use it.
0 likesBtw, the police and criminal justice system both agree with me, considering he was charged with homicide as a result of him pulling his weapon and deciding to use it with no regard for how the situation was unfolding.
3 likesDisagree. What if the victim had a gun and just backed up to grt ready to pull a firearm
0 likes@J T the victim was the guy who died
3 likesEasy for you to say... sitting here writing this comment in your cozy house. You really think it’s that easy in a chaotic situation to decide? Bozo
1 likeSo you don't think at all he would be abit disoriented after taking that hard of a fall? maybe he didn't have eyes on the target before he was backed up... saw the victim move his leg and then shot him. This case is not easy and i think a 30year punishment for something that is not 100% clear is way too harsh.
0 likes@Amina Ballerina I know i would just ask what is happening... Throwing yourself at someone for talking loudly is way overkill.
0 likes@Damjan Ilic Thats what i was thinking dude pushed him first cuz he knows he's bigger
2 likes@Sensei .22 Nigga learned in hood and prison to punch before and talk later. This wisdom cost him his life.
1 like@KillSpawn47 but he didn’t and now that coward is finishing the last chapter of his life locked behind bars and getting beat with combination locks 😆
1 likeIf he would have shot him 2 seconds earlier it would have been clear self defence but because he waited and the guy had time to take two steps back its a different story.
1 like@fresh donkey ummm you can’t murd3r somebody for just pushing you right..? I feel like the prosecutor would be on his a** if he shot while he was first approaching bc where is the threat to your life? Maybe if he kept advancing after he was on ground could’ve been an argument for his lawyers there.
1 like@John Samos I mean I think he could of more legitimately claimed he feared for his life and that the guy was about to pounce on him and it was a split second life or death situation, but after the guy takes two steps back its pretty clearly not self-defence.
1 like@Alexander D it is illegal to threaten someone with a gun with no intention to use it or reason to. Like if someone cuts you off and you flash a gun. That would def be illegal.
0 likes@J T someone died over a missing parking pass. That's very stupid.
2 likes@J T it's just a parking spot man calm down. The way you keep typing "THUG" in all caps makes me feel like you had some personal problems with the victim even before the push.
8 likes@Kamel Purnell The victim is the guy in jail who got railroaded for defending himself against a violent, rabbid, THUG.
0 likes@J T he wouldn't be in jail if that was the case but sure buddy
6 likesObviously, this is the same feeling that the entire jury had. Your pointing out a known fact, but behaving as if any rationale person wouldn't reach the same conclusions.
0 likesDon't steal disabled parking places. That's just rude.
1 like@Alexander D that doesn't apply to self defense. Ffs.
0 likes@Mike Oxlong it's not insignificant to disabled people who need the space.
1 like@J T thug? Why thug?
1 like@Sergeant Speed exactly. Michael Dunn ring à bell ?
0 likes@Monique L it's in the Constitution. It's a right people want.
0 likes@J T p
0 likesPresident Biden is doing a GREAT job.
@J Tbro he killed a man for pushing him
4 likes@Kokonut It was a cowardly and VIOLENT shove, and the thug was approaching the victim to continue his assault when the victim thankfully was able to lawfully defend himself with his gun. The jury got it wrong.
1 like@J T if a 10 year old pushes another kid on the playground that must also be grounds to shoot, correct?
7 likesHe did not even need to show the gun its a case of minding your own dam buiness. And worst case senario take the illigal and show you have a weapon.... but if you have to show gun then you probally have to use it.... and this guy just straight up murdered a guy he was in the wrong and in the video it looked like the guy backed off any way
1 like@Video et Taceo I highly doubt any disabled person would think of Michael as their knight in shining armor for harassing poc.
1 likeDO NOT draw a weapon unless it is already time for something to be destroyed. There is no step inbetween drawing the weapon and using it. It is not a threat. It is not a show and tell object. It is not a toy.
0 likes@Sa DMS A person can die from a beating.
1 like@Alexander D yeah but once you pull it... with the intention of using it you can put it back!
2 likes@Vandal Nope. The violent THUG who attacked the victim was IN THE STORE at the time, and came out and BLINDSIDED the victim with a violent and dangerous shove out of nowhere, simply because he didn't like the words that the victim was saying! I'm glad he got what he had coming.
1 likeI holded the power of your 3.9k likes or 4.0k likes. I played with it for full 2 minutes lol
2 likes@Emil Rimac Hahaha
1 like@Sand in my Toes there's no point, he's been at it for like 7 months; he's not gonna stop
0 likes@J T "Violently attack someone you think is weaker." That's literally what the guy with a gun did to like 20 people before this confrontation (let's say that they were even whiter than him so that you wouldn't put the blame on them).
3 likes@Alexander D I’m sure 10,000 people have already said this but in case they haven’t, I think you’re thinking of “brandishing a weapon”, which wouldn’t apply here because brandishing a weapon applies to situation where you are using it as a threat instead of as a defense.
2 likesHonestly if someone that much bigger than me came up and pushed me on the ground that easily, I would shoot too. I wouldn’t have even confronted the woman in the first place though, which I think was looking for trouble, and very irresponsible to do when you know you can kill somebody easily. Context is very important, but getting pushed to the ground like that I think is enough to shoot.
1 likebut he didnt back away
0 likes@charles wheelock OK nevermind, I've been getting replies from this and I've agreed from the first one. So I guess I'm replying just to say I'm agreeing.
0 likes@J T except this guy has pulled on gun on several people before... pushing someone once isn't enough to kill someone and calling someone a thug cause their black and a killer innocent cause he's white is telling..
2 likes@J T first off it was closer to three seconds, and even two is enough knkw what someone right in front of you is doing, but you surprisingly said something correct here: He did stop when he saw the gun. That means he was no longer attacking him. What Michael did was escalate a situation unnecessarily after it already ended.
1 like@Damjan Ilic that’s not justice though. Even if we all believed in “an eye for an eye”, that wasn’t an eye for an eye, that was more of “blowing a hole in your chest for pushing me”.
1 like@fasfan since he had no idea who the guy was or what he was doing it was fine to pull the gun, but afterwards he stopped moving towards him there was no reason to shoot him.
0 likes@Mike Oxlong and he parked illegally to so he was just looking for trouble by then
1 like@John Smith it was three seconds though, and the man was right in front of him. In fact by the time he pointed his gun the man was backing away, and by the time he fired he took 2-3 steps back.
1 like@Joseph Moncada he was unarmed though. The man not once said he was afraid the guy would acid attack/stab/bludgeon/strangle/etc him in any way. He just wanted a reason to shoot him and thought the shove was enough.
0 likes@Sean Gallagher I covered that in one of my replies. I said pulling the gun was a gray area. I don't know if I would have pulled it, but an argument could have been made making it justified. But I think we all agree that the shooting was not justified.
0 likes@James Kraatz Look up the "21 foot rule." 5 feet, you say? Takes a quarter second to be on someone ...
0 likes@J T dead thug huh? Tell us how you really feel, this guy got sent away for no reason huh?
2 likes@Honest Jim no, that's not how that works. If you follow someone screaming at them at the top of your lungs gs for Instance, they get mad and push you, then you shoot them cause they pushed you, thats actually on you hun! And you'd know that, if you watched the video :)
1 like@Dahliah b. only in the context you are giving which is very specific. In that scenario I am harassing you. So I am committing a crime. You cannot claim self defense if someone was defending themselves from you who is committing a crime. Its a false equivalence.
0 likesThat is not at all what I said. If you assaulted me with your fists. You were the one committing the crime, I am not obligated to match you with the same level of force.
Griffin Jones you must not know the difference between stand your ground law and self defense. You should look up the difference between the two
0 likes@Friendly Player That's a lie. NO threat was made whatsoever. You clearly haven't read the transcripts.
0 likesLiterally.
1 like@J T yikes, if you’re racist just say that and move on
1 likePeople shouldn't walk around with loaded guns in the first place.
1 like@Amina Ballerina i'd ask them what's going on and why they are so excited. And then i'd listen, understand their perspective and probably end up saying that i understand his anger and that we'd move the car. In return he'd realize that he overreacted and apologize as well. We'd shake hands, continue shopping and go home to make dinner 😊
0 likes@J T How did it save his life? Did the other guy have a knife out ready to stab him? No. He backed away. If he got closer even with the gun pointed then yes you can say he had intention of harming the other person even with the gun pulled out. But he didn't.
3 likes@J T bro what makes him a thug? And also I hope you don't own firearms because your way of thinking and processing reality might put you in the same spot as the wannabe in this video.
1 likemanslaughter
0 likesI agree the the man shouldn’t have been shoved, I agree that the man did the right thing pulling out the gun because he felt his life was being threatened. I don’t understand why he shot though. The man was clearly backing away slowly. And he didn’t even have to say “BACK UP OR I’LL SHOOT”. He just shot the other man. Also, if the man wanted to beat him up, wouldn’t a sucker punch be the better option? And it’s not like he intended for him to fall on the ground, he just wanted to provoke him and push him away from his wife.
1 like@Alexander D Self defense doesn't just apply to shooting someone. You can brandish a firearm as long as it is in self defense.
0 likesUnfortunately the Kevins and Karens of the world WANT to use their guns that is why they approach people as if they entitled to enforce some law.
2 likes@J T sure, someone is going to kill you because u talked to their wife agressively, it is this character of being selfish, thinking that everyone is bad, that lets these situations unfold in the first place. And also contributed by his bossy nature to begin with. See good in people.
0 likes@Monique L If you watch the video dispassionately you can see the guy IS advancing before the gun comes out, presumably to attack the guy on the ground. He ONLY stops because the guy draws his weapon. The shooter WAS wrong to shoot after the guy backs away, but stopping that threat is precisely why being pro-gun/carrying a weapon can be a life saver. Having some interpersonal skills, instead of blindsiding a guy might go a long way to de-escalation as well. Again, this situation went bad, but guns save thousands of innocent people a year in situations similar to this.
1 like@Ellie Baker You do know you are exaggerating/lying to try to make your point? Not just anyone can buy a gun, there isn't a "significant" number of people who think shooting someone is the answer. There are clear thinking folks who are wise enough to know there are bad people out there who will do good people harm if not stopped, hopefully that means before the gun comes out, and surely before it's fired. You can't legitimately make a blanket statement like that and expect any intelligent and honest people to take it seriously.
0 likes@Honest Jim Bravo, sir.
0 likes@J T man your classmates at recess must've hated you
0 likesHe killed the guy that had just assaulted him. It wasn’t murder. Manslaughter at most.
1 like@Alexander D there’s a difference between scaring a threat with a firearm and flaunting a gun in a threatening manner. Ones illegal, the others not.
0 likesHe should have never pulled the gun. One of three things will happen at that point.. You will shoot them, they will take it from you and shoot you or if you are lucky they back away and nobody gets hurt. At any rate the chance that the third option will happen doesn't justify the risk of the first two. This guy just clearly wanted to kill someone.
2 likes@Deep Blue I was told that the police actually had a talk with him about this exact sort of thing a few days before this incident, where he was basically told to stop playing parking lot cop.
0 likesExactly. Not man slaughter.
0 likes@Sa DMS A beating? Dude, you realize people die from beatings right? Also, you are allowed to use deadly force when you believe either a) your life is in danger or b) you are in danger of serious bodily harm
0 likesThis is self defense
@fasfan He had time to decide, you can see the moment of hesitation. He decided to shoot anyway after he paused seeing the man back up. He was tryin to protect his fragile ego, not his racist ass from a beating.
1 like@Sergeant Speed Thank you for speaking up. Appreciate and respect
0 likes@Damjan Ilic its not natural to kill someone or try to kill them when they shove you
0 likes@Malik Jones he pulled the gun the guy backed away this guy was waiting for an excuse to shoot someone give his one incher pincher the thrill of his life and that about sums it up
0 likes@The Sauce just for further context FOR YOU. The first thing I said was this
0 likes"This really is a rare event. Think of the amount of times people have properly and effectively used guns to defend themselves." - in other words this was not right what he did, but there are situations that using a gun is justified to defend yourself. So once again, learn to read because you say something idiotic
Totally agree, if he really wanted to use the gun he cold atleast have fired a warning shot
0 likesYou could even see when he pulled it out, EVERYONE backed up, 3 seconds later he still shot.
0 likesHe's careless and uncontrollable.
@Lottie Gallagher Got it. So words you don't agree with is justification for violent assaults. I'll keep that in mind. I don't like your words in particular.
0 likesIt's about sending a message that everybody will understand.
0 likes@Sadistic Demon yeah, they understand they will go to jail if they do it also lmao.
0 likesWtf you talking about lol
@J T why do you call him a thug??? From his POV some random stranger was in a altercation with his wife while he went to get snacks with his son. That sounds like a caring father and husband to me.
0 likes@mechtech256 True but people are keeping guns only because physical violence is not punished hard enough by the courts.
0 likes@J T no way you’re actually defending this guy. If some old ass man was trying to pick a fight with your girlfriend and children, what would you have done?
0 likes@willshealy556 He wasn't "picking a fight." If I saw a guy TALKING to my girlfriend, I'm not going to run up and blindside him with a violent shove and then continue to threateningly advance toward him to continue beating him while he's on the ground...
0 likesWhy are people here saying that the guy got tackled? Did they not watch the surveillance footage that was shown many times throughout the video, or do they just not know what tackling is?
0 likesbest comment so far
0 likes@J T of course, the black dude who was protecting his wife is a “thug” whereas the guy who shot the dude for pushing him is the “victim”. Wonder where I’ve seen this one before?
0 likes@꧁ ꧂ beating sometimes is dead
0 likes@J T Holy racist delusions
1 like@J T maybe he shouldn't be screaming at a woman and children for committing a traffic violation. last I checked that's not random citizen man's job. like what the fuck?
0 likesthere is no justification for this. it was a fucking parking violation, and the victim pushed this dude to the ground because this dude had been screaming at his family until he walked outside. so his response to being pushed is to shoot him and take his life.
that's not self defense. his life was not in danger. he created the situation, and could have left at any moment.
@J T 🤡🤡🤡🤡
0 likesyep
0 likes@J T 1. the man never steps toward him once he hotd the ground not once he was levaing 2 your only calling him a thug cause hes black you have some obvious underlying racism cause the man was protecting his family from a kan yelling at his wife and kids
0 likes@Sa DMS You have no idea b/c you don't know what McGlockton - a younger, larger, stronger, faster human being who was high on MDMA at the time - was planning had Drejka NOT pulled his gun but it certainly seemed like he was going in for more.
0 likes@Cliff Nasa Incorrect assessment. That is not how SYG works which is why many experts agree that it was a justified shooting. Drejka had reasonable reason to believe his safety was in jeopardy AFTER being violently assaulted and injured and took measured action (ONE bullet) to neutralize the threat. Totally justified.
0 likes@fasfan McGlockton was high on MDMA, had a hx of assault, pulled up his pants and advanced towards Drejka 2-3 steps AFTER THE PUSH before the gun was pulled and used - totally justified shooting and many legal experts agree.
0 likes@Monique L lol...b/c the gun saved Drejka from further bodily harm and possibly death at the hands of a younger, stronger, faster drug addicted aggressor like McGlockton who had a hx of drug abuse and assaulting a police officer....that's how.
0 likes@Sabrason First of all... you're being just as much of an armchair attorney as the rest of us so slow your roll. Your opinion is just as valid as everyone else's. Make no mistake... that's all these are... opinions. We are all basing our opinions in our own experiences. I'm basing my opinion in my years in law enforcement as well as what I'm seeing in the video. But at the end of the day... none of our opinions mean squat. The only opinions that DO matter is the opinion of the court. It doesn't matter how many "experts" you say say it was justified, there are just as many other "experts" who say it wasn't.
1 likeSo again... relax. These are YouTube comments where people are just having a conversation about their opinions. That's it. If you're getting that worked up over them then I suggest maybe contacting betterhelp.com.
@JJ Hancock I like YOU
1 like@J T alright you got me in a bubble now man
0 likes@Sean Gallagher Of course there was b/c he STILL didn't know if McGlockton was armed or what his next move was.
0 likes@fasfan I agree with many legal experts around the country who agreed that it was a justified SYG case. Valid opinions can only be based on FACTS and the LAW. Your personal agendas, experiences and biases should not and do not have anything to do with it. The SYG law in Florida is quite clear. Lethal force is allowed if a person reasonably believes they're at risk of bodily harm = SYG. Very simple, point blank, period. Drejka was violently pushed to the ground, injured his arm while McGlockton hiked up his pants and advanced 2-3 steps AFTER the push to continue the assault. That's reasonable fear of ADDITIONAL bodily harm since Drejka was already on the ground and injured. Drejka was NOT required to wait until McGlockton jumped on him before he fired. Your years in "law enforcement" are questionable and irrelevant particularly since a cop would immediately draw their weapon and fire at a violent offender who assaulted them the way McG did to Drejka and they'd shoot to kill. There are videos of that same thing all over YT Mr. "law enforcement."
0 likes@Sarah Coomer <---forgot to go to her electroshock therapy session.
0 likes@Sabrason Police do not "shoot to kill" so you obviously do not know what you're talking about. And I maintain my stance that all these comments, including yours, are just opinion and conjecture. I also think you need to do more research. Police do not shoot people just because someone pushes them. There are rules that govern the use of deadly force. If you're so sure this was justified under Florida SYG law... then why is he in prison? You know what... don't answer. Because I don't care. As I stated... you have your opinion. I have mine. I'm not trying to change your opinion. I was merely stating mine. You can either choose to accept it, ignore it, or continue to let MY opinion live rent free in your head threatening your world view so much that you feel the need to continue to waste your time. It's all up to you.
0 likes@Sabrason ok vintage royal ripper
0 likesNope, you are not a person in power whatsoever, everyone on earth is equal and jesus is coming soon repent now before it is to late. GOD IS WATCHING YOU SIN EVERYDAY!!
0 likesCan’t agree more with this statement.
2 likes@Alexander D you are correct. Kinda like how discharging a fire arm is also a felony.
0 likesAvishai H Both of the people endangered them selfs because they were too quick to resort to aggressive confrontation. Both of them paid a heavy price for this. However, at the end of the day the gunman should not have fired. Watch the footage, as soon as he pulled the gun out the black man froze. The black guy halted the aggression as soon as the gun came out, he was also unarmed. The white guy was in the wrong and deserved time. 21 foot rule is invalid because he did not have a knife and he was not sprinting towards him. Lethal force is a last resort not a first resort. I don’t blame him for drawing his weapon per se but he should have used verbal commands and then retreated away.
2 likes@Smoke Break MMA internet tough guy
0 likes@J T "hiking up his pants" is not a sign of continuing "violent assault". It's a sign of preparing for a fight. He pushed the man, then backed up and readied for a fight. As soon as he saw the gun, he started to retreat, and then was shot.
0 likesIf you pull a gun it's to shoot it, anything else is illegal.
0 likesSimeon Roban you obviously don’t know the difference between self defense and stand your ground. I suggest looking it up. Everything you said is incorrect. If you attack me I can legally defend myself, that’s self defense, if you attack me or a family member and then run I can legally shoot you in the back. That’s called stand your ground. See the difference?
0 likes@Magnetosphere I fully agree
0 likes@Simeon Roban Well, yeah. Fair enough. I meant in the context of the video though, where the guy who got shot is pretty clearly trying to disengage.
0 likes@Melarus I live in the U.K. and yes there is a small section of society that carries knives but it is a very small group and they on the whole are not threatening to the wider public. I don’t worry about your average person carrying a knife. As for the state, the police only respond to a gun threats with a gun. So I don’t have to worry about being shot by police either. If course there are other ways of killing people but without guns any conflicts between anyone are far less fatal.
1 likeWhy would pulling a gun without intent to use it be illegal? I mean that would just cause people to use the guns more if they are already getting into a trouble for it.
0 likes@Melarus In the US you have people from all walks of life possessing guns. This is not the same in the U.K. for knives. Like I said, it’s a very small cross section of society, usually poor working class, who live in particular areas, boys between the age of 15-25. Like I said, only for reports of gunshots do a special force come out to deal with such cases. Your average policeman is not armed. That’s the way it should be.
1 likegood
0 likesThat’s 100% true. What is also true is you don’t attack people. Not only because they might be armed, but because it is a shitty thing to do and if you happen to get shot because you wanna look tough, I’m not gonna cry over it.
0 likes"Pull a gun and they back away, then the gun has served its purpose" I guess it depends on the country, as a cop i would say yes, as a civilian i would say, meh why a civilian has a gun? But i know that you have the 2nd amendment here, i respect that and i understand that. It's an institution and a part of the USA's History.
1 likeBut as a European it's hard to think that a civilian can use a weapon like guns, assault rifles like AR-15 etc. I think it should be only used for military purpose, by cops and soldiers and not by any civilians.
Guns need a human to be deadly, but humans can be so dumb sometimes and it can escalate so quickly and it can literally erase the existence of a person, so i guess it's hard to trust that it will always be used on purpose. :(
(I don't want to do Europe vs USA thing, because i love USA, guns are a part of USA, i know that!!! I accept that!
And USA isn't only about guns. It's an awesome country with many beautiful landscapes many awesome and different ppl and cultures. It's just hard sometimes for me to see a civilian with a gun :( )
(and i'm sorry for my bad english by the way)
@J T "The dead thug", don't tell on yourself TOO hard there, totally not racist guy. How could the shooting NOT be justified...THE GUY'S A THUG!
1 like@꧁ ꧂ Very well written! 💯💯
1 likeNot accurate at all. You shoot until the threat is eliminated. Of course everyone will back away at the sight of a gun. However you don’t know what’s going to happen next. If they too have a gun, they will then use it because now THEY are in fear for their life. Like how stupid are. If a burglar points a gun at you, do you think backing away will make him back away lol
0 likes@Damjan Ilic I've been pushed and spat on and walked away and I'm alot more proud of it and didn't need gun
0 likes@MarcosElMalo2 u have no clue what was said and what he heard, you would've done the same thing if some things were said to a person u hold dear
0 likes@MarcosElMalo2 plus that's not what the case was about after the gun is pulled he's perfectly safe and the person was backing up , if he just stood up and walked away pointing the gun at him as he walked away they both woulda been fine and the other guy would have actually got in trouble but now they both ruined their lives
0 likes@Honest Jim after he pulled the gun the guy was walking away if he just stood up and walked backwards away it would have been fine also apart of the evidence that made him become guilty is the fact he said he is not a fighter he even states he never fought in school and says he is not a fighter and he even admits people can feel confronted when he checks for stuff and stating the reason he feels safe is the fact he has a permit to carry a weapon so he states he will rely on his weapon , what if he said he was a trained and was in ufc and was said he wasn't worried he could just subdo someone without getting hurt or said he wasn't worried because he can run fast but he doesn't say any of that he says he feels safe cuz he has a permit ,and its also cleary shown the victim was walking away . The shooter was in the absolute right until he shot a person that was backing away and was not doing any more harm. If u were approaching someone with a knife to kill them and they gta style pull a rocket launcher from their ass and you start walking back do you think you think that gives someone the right to kill you. If if you started it and were going out to kill them it doesn't matter like you said the ignorance doesn't justify anything. Your words not mine dumb ass. Get wrecked.
0 likes@Smoke Break MMA alright I hate blm and all that other shit and I love mma I just got back from a 5 day wrestling camp and as a another fighter bro you can't just be assuming he's a thug. Like I make racist and I've said the n word im not perfect but I love black people they are the same as all of us ,don't judge a book by its cover. He could have been anybody , he might have been the next Israel adesanya for all we know.
0 likes@Smoke Break MMA it isn't about the gun or none of that i know for a fact my dad a white guy would 100 percent would have done the same thing in the victims shoes and I would also be very concerned and prolly frustrated for someone disrespecting my family.
0 likesThank you for putting together the words that I couldn’t
2 likes@Theunkown guy LMAO, are you sure you're responding to the right person? Because what you said doesn't go against anything I've said thus far. So get wrecked? lol
0 likes@Rumchata Not accurate from you aswell, you dont shoot untill you eliminate the threat, you shoot to kill, and if he just survives your bullet, ok good.
0 likes@J T 21:00-21:50 Why are you defending a liar so much?
0 likesWhat we've learned from this case is that if someone pushes you from behind, you can fall, take your gun out, turn around and shoot him.
0 likesWhat you can't do is hesitate for a second before shooting, cause than 20 years bro.
Anyway my first comment was a Star Wars quote, so the joke's on all of ya.
@Damjan Ilic Uh, no. What you can't do is still shoot when you hesitate long enough to see them clearly disengaging from the situation. Not to mention, parking lot cop was legally the aggressor in this situation so he'd have a tricky time defending it even if he had instantly shot. Waiting until they put their hands up and back off just makes it even more clear cut.
0 likes@꧁ ꧂ If parking lot Batman shot without hesitation, he could sell being in shock and get less years.
1 like@Honest Jim prolly did respond to the wrong person , so much wasted typing lol
0 likes@Theunkown guy lol thats the problem with a conversation of 400 comments. I wish they had a way to sort of filter some out.
0 likes@Honest Jim yeah I know there's no way I was gonna go back and see who I mightve replied to and see why I replied saying that, I would have to search for like 10 minutes
0 likes@Damjan Ilic Hahaha that's certainly true
0 likesJust makes them pull theirs.... Bad idea, use it!
0 likes@Damjan Ilic so now that I have your IP what should I do with it
0 likes@Nadia Mendes tattoo it
0 likesUnfortunately, the law in most states, that would be considered "brandishing".
0 likesYou're told in CCW training time and time again. You ONLY pull out your gun when you HAVE to use it. Any other time is illegal.
depends on the state
0 likesWhat an idiotic comment. First :"Murder" was never an issue, there is a big difference between "murder" and "manslaughter". Second : He was attacked from behind, he obviously did not see it coming. So he was in a state of shock. Do you really think in such a panic state, you can differentiate, whether the attacker has made a step forward or backward?? I don`t think so. He just realized that the threat was still there and shot out of panic. Blacks nowadays are sacred in the U.S. , that s why he got punished like that.
0 likes@J T so the man is a thug for trying to protect his wife and family from a man aggressivly berating them over a frivolous mistep. Cool. Cool.
1 likeExactly
0 likes@J T well said, that is exactly what accurately happened. The guy who was shot was larger and bigger was indeed hiking up his pants, and advancing towards the victim who was lying on the floor, after being pushed down violently . The only reason he stopped and backed is after seeing the gun. Michael would have been in a hospitalized or killed if it wasn't for his self defense.
0 likesAll the ‘adults’ in this situation were in the wrong. Right from the beginning.
0 likesQuick story, yesterday i got my first car, i also own several firearms, and my father brought up that if i were to ever get in road rage or a public incident don’t pull your Glock out. I said” HAHAHAHA, Dad literally what the fuck are you talking about” and word for word what you said here is what i said yesterday to him. Like deja fucking vou.
0 likesAlso your opinion(s):
If someone was trying to run you off the road while driving, very aggressive like. Is it right to hold your fire arm out the window to show them you’re not one to mess with? Rather is it legal, cause I’m pretty sure someone trying to run you off is an endangerment to your life? Am i right or am i wrong?
@Damjan Ilic so if some else of a different color had pushed, then no revenge naturally? Wow.
0 likesNot all the time
0 likes@Gerhard Hauptmann you should go watch the verdict for this guy. its not the first time he has harrased people in a parking lot. he is wanabe cop who took things too far, he thought it was his duty to police the disabled place in that parking lot. he would sit in the gun shop accross the street waiting for someone to park there. most ironic thing is. when he pulls into the parking lot he parks iligally himself. then proceeds to verbally attack a pregnant woman an her kids for parking in a disabled space. He admitted in an interview that he would not have aproached people and confront them if he never carried a gun. he had it comming. Im glad he wont see the light of day outside iron gates again.
1 like@Sa DMS Beatings don't kill? Sure, bud.
0 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton what kind of a racist bs is that? If someone pushes you like that, the dark side will command revenge or it will feed of you for the rest of your life. In the end you will hurt someone innocent.
0 likes"Do what must be done Lord Drejka, do not hesitate, show no mercy."
@Redd Someone I know got arrested for doing literally that exact thing and went to prison for a few months. So, not legal where I live at least.
0 likes@꧁ ꧂ state?
0 likes@꧁ ꧂ I’m in tn, open/conceal carry is legal now without a license. So if that tells ya something
0 likes@Damjan Ilic wow...you brought race into this by what is expected when it is a n****. It is your choice to allow it to feed you in a negative way. Revenge comes in many forms; murder is one but often you end up screwing yourself. That is what Drejka did.
1 likeTo continue your view, you can argue that the McGlockton’s response was natural seeing an adult man yelling and intimidating his fiancée and his children. He was pushing away the perceived threat. He also had the natural reaction of backing away when he saw the gun as shown in the video.
There was no need for you to bring race into and use the n-word
@Redd AR
0 likesI want to thank everybody for so many replies.
0 likesSo much hypocrisy on both sides.
@J T 100%
0 likesMaybe don't impulsively shove people to the ground from a blind angle? That would have saved the mans life.
1 like@꧁ ꧂ "homocide" 😂 LAWL
0 likes@Sa DMS you should look into accidental deaths during fist fights.
0 likesCan someone explain this, coz I feel I don't understand this part. Why did the Markeis shove Michael as soon as he came out of the store? He was just having a verbal disagreement with his wife right? Did I miss something?
1 like@Dr. House trying to be a badass because someone was "disrespecting" his old lady.
0 likes@Wes Treadwell I know that's a thing but what's worse a situation that could have happened or a situation that did how many gunshot survivors are there compared to fight survivors lol
1 likeHas it? Or am I just giving a threat the chance to get his gun?
0 likesAfter being pushed to the ground, he took around 1 second to draw his firearm, and took three seconds to decide to shoot the man while he was about to turn around.
1 likeWhen you have a gun in a hostile situation you yourself will become hostile and something you naturally wouldn’t. A gun makes people stupid.
1 like@Cliff Nasa You might be desentized Cliff. Probably should check that shit homie.
0 likes@Joe Lovell Yaaaaah!
0 likes@John Kordulak Yaaaaaah!
0 likesYou’re right the fact that he deemed this a worthy time to shoot his gun off INTO HIS CHEST just shows he was waiting for this moment
1 like@J T…and 1 or 2 seconds of minding his own business would have costed the “victim” his freedom. You don’t walk up to somebody’s car trying to check them over a parking spot like you’re the police. He wanted that authority he should’ve joined the police department. Now I do agree that man should not have pushed him but as far as he knew some random dude was a THREAT to his family. And why does he have to be a thug? FOH!
2 likes@Racheal Silburn Pretty obvious that some of these people think he's a thug because he's black. If he was white they would have been shitting all over the shooter for instigating. Btw, my CCL instructor (ex-cop / cop shooting instructor) showed us this video as an example of a blatantly unjustified shooting and told us that the actual police had warned this guy to stop playing parking lot cop for pretty much the exact same thing a week before, when he caused another incident.
0 likes@꧁ ꧂ well stated!
0 likes@Racheal Silburn How many people have you pushed with full force for talking to your family? None I presume, because people have ability to speak and most people will not use force before they try to resolve a situation verbally.
0 likesYou never know if a guy will respond to force with a force multiplier :)
@J T Take justice. The justice system is compromised, it’s a joke.
0 likesFalse assertion.
0 likes@Sa DMS still self defense.
0 likesapply that logic to choosing between blindy assaulting a man who is right about your car being in a place where it shouldn't VS. admitting your fault, apologising and immediately moving your car.
0 likesthere lies the issue.
@Adil Hlol you literally just typed that he only stopped after seeing the gun. So shooting the dude wasn't necessary. Thanks for playing.
0 likes@mechtech256 maybe dont vote anymore if youre so easy to influence that youtube comments are changing your stance on gun control
0 likesAgreed
0 likes@Alexander D It depends on where you live and what the situation is on whether or not brandishing is justified. In mostly all states youre gonna get fucked if you pull out your firearm without your life being seriously in danger. You really just gotta look at the laws in your state itll give you the answers even tho they may be vague which is done on purpose 🙄 hate it. In this case brandishing and using his firearm both arent justified, he just got pushed and there was no threat to his life. Sorry im late just thought id add my 2 cents since ive been in a brandishing incident. Also the rule if you carry is you dont pull it unless youre going to use it that way it keeps you out of that stupid brandishing bullshit laws 🤷♂️
0 likes@J T “dead thug” cool story bro.
0 likesso based
0 likes@J T not u defending a murderer
0 likes@Monique L Monique - two sisters were stabbed to death in a London park recently by a man who had written a contract with some demon offering sacrifices in return for money. Their final selfie apparently shows them looking anxiously to the side as they see him approaching. I wish one of those sisters had been carrying. The police would never have got there in time. I hear of situations literally every week in which innocent lives could've been saved had the victim been carrying a firearm for self defence. But you 'can't imagine' a situation where you would need a gun? I would respectfully say that in that case you're not paying attention, or else you assume that things which happen to others on a weekly basis could just never happen to you.
0 likesThis whole 'I trust my life to the authorities' attitude is why Americans are rightly loath to give up their firearm rights. Why on earth would would you be happy to entrust your life and safety to 'the authorities'? There were 700 homicides in the UK in the last year we have figures for. The authorities didn't save those 700 people. That's 2 people per day. Sure, they weren't you, but they still matter, right?
@gharqad That happened very close to where I live. It was very sad and it is actually a rare event. Of course we never think these things will never happen to us but there are precautions I do take. I personally never stay in Parks after dark. It’s something I stand by even if it’s only 5pm in the evening. It’s something I absolutely never do.
1 like@Monique L Yes, a really tragic case. It's a sad fact that we take these precautions, but the fact that you do is ample demonstration that you know the authorities do not, and cannot, protect everyone, all the time, so what right do these authorities have to say to a citizen that they may not carry a device that could safeguard their own life? The law enforcement apparatus cleans up the mess and takes offenders off the street after the event - but 700 times a year that is too late, and does not bring loved ones back.
1 likeI respectfully disagree with your position, but I want to thank you for your courteous and civilised reply, which is an increasing rarity in this day and age. Have a wonderful and safe day Monique.
@gharqad This is a major cultural difference. When you grow up in a society where citizens don’t carry guns, the idea of having to, is completely foreign and alien.
2 likes@Monique L Yes, I appreciate that. That's true. I grew up here in the UK, in a country where citizens aren't allowed to carry weapons, but having seen how utterly ineffectual the authorities are, and how pathetic the justice system has become, my natural inclinations have changed. I would also say that nobody 'has to' carry a weapon in the US. The individual has a choice. Unlike here in the UK, where only the state is armed, and everyone else has to avoid certain places or situations and keep their fingers crossed.
0 likes@gharqad Oh I see, you are from the U.K. aswell. In that case, mental health services should have been alerted. He must have displayed some sort of strange behaviour before committing that crime. He was also failed by his family and community.
0 likes@Monique L I don't disagree. But this is always the British way: hold an enquiry after the event and find out what went wrong, then fail for different reasons next time. All of which, in my opinion, lends weight to what I'm saying: the authorities do not and cannot protect everyone, of course they can't! So we should be allowed to protect ourselves. If one of those girls had been carrying a weapon, they maybe get him to back off. Maybe. I don't say guns are a panacea, of course not. I dislike them, and wish they were never necessary. But there are times when they save innocent lives.
1 likeCompany policy sir if you pull it you got to use it
0 likesWhite Trump fans do not care.
0 likesTrue
0 likesThe guns purpose is to kill
0 likesIf you were in the same situation you would probably do the same thing. When you are attacked it often impairs your judgement.
0 likes@Alexander D dont think it matters if its illegal at the point in which your life is endangered
0 likeswait… this is a really good point. thank you for sharing! i wouldn’t of thought about it this way
0 likesTho pulling the gun is still illegal , you can’t do that for being pushed down , at least here in Florida
0 likes@꧁ ꧂ actually about everything you said is 100% in correct
0 likesWill he push someone to the ground for no reason ever again? Nope
0 likes@Ramanesh Minister of Truth yes he is in Florida state prison he got 20 yrs but will be out in 10. I live 8 mins from where this happen on sunset point.
0 likesi'm a complete gun fan and collector, i think we have in Swiss even more gun's then the US p. Capita, but the main difference is our gun culture, our cops have by every search warrant to expect, that someone could stay behind a door with a gun, but we still never enter a house with a gun pointed to the people, we have a complete other modus operandi, ok, in Europe cops have at least 3 years of school, tactic, law training, especially psycho test, when they note, you are a little bit trigger happy, you don't pass the school, when he would do that in Swiss, he would loose the job and go too jail like every other citizen, maybe even a stronger sentence, because a cop should know how to handle or at least in Europe, they expect that from a Cop
1 likeWhat if they back away to their vehicle or behind cover to pull out their piece safely and retaliate? Shooting them would make them think twice about retaliating while severely injured.
0 likes@꧁ ꧂ It’s hind sight 20/20 for a reason.
0 likes@Nicholas Jones You may be shocked to find out that some people actually have foresight as well
0 likes@Sa DMS And how do you know that? The dude could have been armed and retreat behind his vehicle to start a shootout. He could have lunge to the person on the ground and stole his gun. Also a beating can 100% kill someone. If someone shoved me by surprise that violently I would consider him a lunatic and unpredictable.
0 likes@Sa DMS Not over a parking spot no, over someone attacking me violently from behind... And I'm not American.
0 likes@J T lol if you support all lives matter just say that
0 likes@Sa DMS A beating is death for some people
0 likes@Nathen especially when the guy on the other end of the gun is backing away even if you shoot the gun learn how to use it shoot in the knee not in the chest what are the chances of getting killed by a gun to a beating 🤔
0 likes@J T Bullshit. Saved his life? The victim backed away he had no reason to pull the trigger.
1 likeUnderstood!!!
0 likesOnly when someone turns their back is it no longer deemed self defense, so the guy backing up shouldn’t take self defense off the table, since logically the guy still is in a position to move forward & attack the gun man. I don’t think it was a justified shoot, but at the same time these situations are made within a fraction of Second sometimes, not easy scenarios to make the right decision in especially if you aren’t trained with a firearm or situational awareness.
0 likesAbsolutely true
0 likesAt the end, prosecutor keeps calling the victim Michael McLogdan😒
0 likesI feel like all of these criminals are named Michael
1 likeCrazy stepped back was not in no threat and waited a few seconds after drawing his gun to shoot.
0 likesShooting a man this way is unjustifiable and deserves to be punished severely. But I think how the victim pushed him in the first place is also very aggressive and potentially dangerous (if you hit head first on the ground). I think this triggered the shooter for revenge.
1 likeReplies (1)
Its called the man assaulted him and got shot in return. The one who died is a criminal
0 likesRight hand - left hand handshake is the most revolutionary technique we've seen in this series so far. I'd be getting anxious just from how casually both officers just went with it.
312 likesReplies (8)
Lmao
3 likeshis right arm was injured?
5 likes@Saiyan Buu that's the joke.
4 likesKendo I don't get it then lol, he's got way bigger problems than a handshake
2 likes@Saiyan Buu Jim always elaborates on all these unique techniques cops use to get a suspect to reveal info. The joke Latenight made is that this was one of those neat techniques.
12 likes@Saiyan Buu his arm was not injured it's a sympathy card he knew he fucked up lol
9 likesHe hurt his wrist because of his own damn gun. He looks ridiculous using his shirt as a sling for a damn bruise.
5 likesSaiyan Buu his arm seemed fine during the part when he was waiting in the room by himself at the beginning. It wasn’t until the police were there and he tried to play it up like he was so injured he could t use his arm as a defense for shooting the guy.
3 likesIt's clear that once he was shoved to the ground, Drejka was going to get kicked- possibly by more than one person. The dead guy only backed-up when he caught a glimpse of the gun. This all happens within seconds. It's difficult to imagine your state of mind when you've been tackled to the ground by an enraged person. What would you do?... Oh, and don't park in the handicapped space; being black isn't a disability.
1 likeJust watching this one cause I wanna watch wrath of Jodi but don’t have the time lol good stuff sir
0 likes"the color on the video is off" oh so I guess since the color is off he didn't shoot the man since it wasn't in HD.
1 likethat defense attorney was absolutely terrible. reminds me of the one in the bee movie
1 likeI’m surprised nothing was mentioned of him faking an arm injury. When the detectives are out of the room he moves it completely normally, then when they come in he cradles it and says he can’t even shake hands with that arm. Then a minute later he is signing his name with that arm
556 likesReplies (18)
He just did it to seem like the victim even though he just killed a man
49 likesAnd drinks water too
3 likesI broke my arm and signed paperwork at the hospital with the same arm, I am not gonna doodle my signature man I have class
11 likes@Ioan Gisca 😂who asked u?
17 likes@Mary Beth it seems like he was joking. What kind of name is Mary Beth?
12 likes@GamerNot Valid it's a standard name for a female bro lmao
12 likes@Devin Watkins it was a joke. Like Patrice O'Neal making fun of white people for having black names and vice versa. "Yamanika Watkins" bit on The Black Phillip Show or Dave Chappelle's "Draymond Green bit. Y'all need to watch more comedy.
2 likes@Mary Beth the same person who asked you
1 like@GamerNot Valid thank you for trying to defend but being mildly racist and assuming i was joking it's not the way man
5 likes@GamerNot Valid I feel like if I watched thoes and understood the joke. It would still not be funny. Seems dry asf but I'll check it out.
1 likehaving them sign the paper is a tactic, its such a routine thing to sign your name that people who are faking hand/arm injuries just do it, not realizing they are giving themselves away.
1 likeMany of these videos show the aggressor trying to act like a victim
3 likesyes indeed...i noticed the same
0 likesFirst thing I noticed
0 likesI thought he said "Left hand" because he was left handed but he drank with the right hand. Bruh
1 like@Mary Beth uh, they are saying they broke their arm and could sign their name. The shooter didn’t have a broken arm or any actual injury, so I think they were just showing if you can sign your name with a broken arm then you can do it with a mildly sore one.
0 likes@Devin Watkins I guess if you’re over 70 or amish or Mormon it is.
0 likes@C PA yea, they think it’s gonna get them sympathy I guess? Even if he was injured they dont feel sorry for killers, especially ones lying to them taking them for fools. Reminds me of the creature who abducted Elizabeth smart whining that the detective tapping him on the arm was assault.
0 likesReally feel bad for the son that saw his dad collapse in front of him. Kids gonna grow up without a dad over a parking space and some jackass who couldnt mind his own business
1152 likesReplies (59)
Out of curiosity, were the family handicapped? Not that it really matters either way this guys in the wrong
19 likesTo be fair, it's bullshit to see perfectly abled people park in those spots designated for handicapped. But no one should loose their life over a parking space. If he was that concerned, he should have called the police or something but they might laugh him off.
110 likesPrecisely… he should have gone about his ‘own’ business that day. Cost him 20 years not to!
17 likesCould have been avoided, by not parking where you shouldn't
20 likesMoral of the story: dont park in handicapped parking spots
15 likes@atom omnis i thought it was genius, i mean it is true. Is it not?
8 likes@atom omnis it wasn't victimless, there is a guy doing 20 years because of it. Also JFK wasn't doing anything wrong by not staying inside.
7 likesShe was very inconsiderate of handicap people.
People all the time stop and put people on thier place for stuff like this, without the extent of someone getting killed, and usually people say good for them, we need more people like that. All could have been avoided, by following a simple "community" rule, actually a law!
@atom omnis cause and effect. The cause she parked in a handicap spot, the effect someone got killed. Regardless of a handicap needing it at the time, is not relevant.. i mean shit someone died, because she parked there. Your not getting it, and i am grown, grown enough to know better to park in a handicap spot, well not without my handicap permit.
4 likes@atom omnis i also guess you are assuming all handicaps are visible? That's pretty stereotypical, to assume, that you need to be in a wheel chair, cane or limping.. you people, are typical :)
5 likes@JRugg1 1980 The fact that is what you take away from this really shows what a cold and sociopathic person you are. Nobody deserves to be murdered over violating a small rule. Perhaps they should have been fined for being inconsiderate but I wouldn't give a man the death penalty in front of his three young children for making a handicapped person have to travel a couple few more metres from their parking space. Nobody deserves that for such a petty reason.
37 likes@JRugg1 1980 no it is not true
3 likes@Local Pleb im pathetic for saying how it could have been avoided? They would have never been approached if they didn't park where they didn't belong. Hell, it could be argued she actually started the confrontation when rolling the window down and asking what the problem was. Pathetic!
3 likes@JojoplusBo also cost three kids their father
1 like@y/n probs not otherwise it would've been mentioned
0 likes@Local Pleb they are trolling and you're taking the bait 🤦♂️ just let them be
1 like@JRugg1 1980 I'm not sick as long as I'm the one showing some kind of emotion toward the death of a man in front of his family due to spite and revenge from some wanker with a gun
12 likes@JRugg1 1980 You should seriously consider taking a test friend
10 likesHe was not a father, but a boyfriend of that women as it said on the video. Maybe i did not understand
1 like@TheMachineHeraldim not white enough to be racist. my wife and kids are black, and im Puerto Rican, can i be racist, in this situation? Nice try
3 likes@TheMachineHerald sounds like your at a loss, of words..
2 likes@JRugg1 1980 yeah, that's why i wrote 3 comments trying to explain a very simple thing to you, jesus christ i feel like im talking to a preschooler
12 likesdid you have lunch today? do you need to go to the bathroom? did you do your homework?
@JRugg1 1980 "it's not victimless, a guy is doing 20 years for it"
13 likesYou're a clown if this is your takeaway from this
@david vargas it matters, i would also say something. Im also handicaped though, and know how inconsiderate people are who park where they should not, because they are lazy.
4 likes@Kiza and a universal; if it isn’t killing or hurting someone, just mind your business
3 likes@Luxer true, but that entire situation could have been avoided if they simply parked in one of the many available parking spaces, and if the Husband didn't escalate the situation by getting physical.
6 likesI feel bad for the son whose father was a drug addict with a hx of assault. Kid is better off and will hopefully learn from his drug addict father's stupid mistake of laying hands on people.
4 likes@Winter Moon Along the same lines, NOBODY should be assaulted for having a conversation/argument with a stranger illegally parked in a HC spot either.....works both ways.
5 likesIt's probably for the best. If the kind of lessons you teach your kids are to attack people who "wrong" you, you don't need to be raising kids. They'll grow up as bad or worse.
2 likes@boi boi Of course it is, bullets are great teachers especially in SYG states. Keep your hands off strangers or you could be forced to take the dirt nap.
5 likes@kb I know, you probably have people in your life who share your victim mentality, feckless weaklings who would cower in the face of a life threatening situation, frozen with fear and incapable of pulling a firearm and actually using it in self defense, helpless and totally beholden to a violent attacker and begging for their lives. In life, you're either a hammer or a nail. Drejka's a hammer, you're a nail.
1 like@y/n no. But they just stopped to get get snacks. It shouldn't take more than 3 minutes
0 likes@Kek Lard probably the best thing for Michael Drejka’s kids to lose their father. He would have taught them to get their LTC and purchase a handgun and then start arguments since they have a gun and if things get heated they can just shoot the person. Those kids are lucky they lost their pos dad.
1 likeI had a pos dad but my mom divorced him when I was little and I don’t have a relationship with him. Good thing too because if I had, I probably would be an alcoholic, aggressive asshole that hits women. Sometimes losing a parent is the best thing for a kid.
@Deja Xyz read what you said here, it actually makes no sense.. from reading your cause and effect scenario, id say no, your right in your thinking, but i call how you explain it. "Natural selection "
0 likes@Deja Xyz i think your the type of person, who parks in handicap spaces, and makes handicap faces! lol
1 likeOr maybe she shouldn’t have parked in that space? Or maybe that guy shouldn’t have pushed him for no real reason. Complex. Stop pretending like you’re some moral authority.
3 likes@Man with No Name the case isnt really that complex. I agree that parking in that space is wrong and pushing the dude was uncalled for however getting shot over it is unreasonable especially considering the dude was retreating. Any other situation and I would see more room a stand your ground case
2 likes@marjhonna brown Wrong. He went to prison because he shot someone that was retreating and no threat, but the husband just had to park in the handicap spot and then escalate the situation further by pushing him when his family was rightfully called out on parking there.
3 likes@JRugg1 1980 I see your point(s) and don’t think you’re a bad person for raising them, but the ‘he was no angel’ argument being rolled out into the obviously biased comment section isn’t a good look the same way as saying ‘if he didn’t resist George Floyd would be alive’ probably wouldn’t be a good look in certain areas. If you don’t want people to assign conservative frameworks to your comments I’d just watch and move on. Also, against your point of ‘if he didn’t push him buddy would be alive’ how do you know that when he brandished his weapon on several occasions against men and women in traffic disputes, one of which there were children in the car... you saying ‘if x then y’ could be extrapolated in any direction our imagination will let us.
1 like@Bumpy Bandwagon im not sure i said anything about, if he didnt push, if i did, it was in response to the cause and effect point. I mainly was saying it all could have been avoided if she didnt park thier, because so many people were saying he should have left them alone. Yes, he should have, but first thing that happened thier was the parking job, started it all.
1 likeI think it sucks a man died, it all could have been avoided, that ultimately is was my point. After that, i was intentionally trying to get a rise from commenters, who were pretty much attacking me, for my comments. It was entertaining for a bit, gave me a few laughs. Especially when the comments about being racist stopped when i said i was Puerto Rican with a black wife and kids.. it all stopped like you can only be racist if your white. Im actually Italian and married to a Italian..
Your comment sir, very classy. You are appreciated
yeah hes probably going to be sad when he finds out that his dad laid out an old man for confronting a woman on breaking the law and got shot for it.
1 like@JRugg1 1980 See a psychiatrist man. You have me a little concerned.
0 likes@y/n unimportant
0 likes@Patrick Rudolph my wife is one. Actually is the director of the practice she works for. I know what im doing.
1 like@JRugg1 1980 I ain’t gonna lie to you here man I’ve never seen somebody get bodied in a thread as hard you have.
1 likeYeah you know what reading these comments made me realize that his wife was all like my man is gunna beat ur ass and shit like she didn’t have to be so rude and then buddy did assault him so like yeah messed up situation lol
2 likes@Not Me i work in the construction field as a pipefitter/welder.. i have thick skin, and i would bet i make more money than most of them.. not that, that matters to me, but it will make some of them even more butt hurt
0 likes@Alex Carson yup, ultimately it was her fault, she parked there and actually made the first confrontation when she asked him what the problem was.
1 like@Russell Smedley you sir have a brain and can think for yourself.. you have something, most these posters, dont have..
1 like@atom omnis but is he wrong? Dude wouldn’t of thought he was doing a public service yelling at her about where she parked if she had parked in the next spot over
2 likes@Dro yea no one had to die but they parked In a handicap spot than when they got confronted he shoved the dude so hard to the ground. He did that in front of his kids. So ya it coulda been avoided
0 likes@Patrick Rudolph maybe look at the other perspective? When you are violent against a stranger you can be shot. And that’s what happened.
0 likes@atom omnis If they hadn't parked in the disabled spot nothing would have happened. The guy was verbally berating them, nothing more. Then the guy comes out the store and escalates the situation by getting physical and pushing the moron to the ground. I say that because getting in an argument over a parking spot is moronic, I don't condone what he did but it was just words at that point. The victim died because he turned the situation from a verbal confrontation to a physical confrontation. No matter how much we say it was wrong, and it is, the series of events the victim enacted was what caused it to end the way it did. Don't get me wrong, no one should have died that day, taking a life for something so stupid is just sick, but the victims created the situation and then escalated the situation because the victim had to "act like a man" in front of his woman.
0 likesI've got a nephew with muscular-dystrophy and it p!sses me off when I see an able bodied person parking in a disabled bay, but I just go about my day knowing they're scum and there's probably worse things in their life than their parking habits. If this situation remained verbal, and the victim hadn't gotten physical, no one would have died. The whole thing sucks, but it's not like it just fell out the sky from nowhere.
@Joe Blow hell yeah, this guy here gets it!!! The first victim, and the one still alive to paying for it decided he wasn't going to take a chance on continuing to be the victim. I myself wouldn't have used my gun, id fought back, but then she may have shot me in the back, or one of the damn kids where prolly packing too. Illegally of course.
0 likes@TheMachineHerald that im not racist but you tried to make it out to be. Cry baby generation
0 likes@TheMachineHerald you just apologized for saying i was racist and then called me racist again..
0 likes@TheMachineHerald so you also feel my frustration?
0 likes@tutorial: brush him it wasnt murder, it was manslaughter
0 likes@tutorial: brush him go play your COD and minecraft with you butt buddy Trevelon
0 likes@Ronan Helvey he definitely did die... absolutely thats a fact, and its all her fault.
0 likesThis is a man who has waited his entire life to use that gun, and that’s exactly the type of person who should never have a gun.
2326 likesReplies (86)
Yes, and it was clear he was looking to pick a fight. He wouldn't have needed to have that gun on his person while going out to rant at the couple if he didn't think he'd ultimately need it.
87 likesHe pointed that gun at at least 4 other drivers - 2 men & 2 women -wakey wakey
21 likesHe should have joined the police first. Cop in the same situation gets away with this, no question.
66 likesNo one should have it
16 likes@just another youtuber jeez calm down. You're literally on a channel where a guy shares his opinions without actually being able to know what the person in the video is thinking
2 likesAs a CHL carrier I while heartedly agree. If you choose to carry you hold a major responsibility to never abuse that type of “power”. Never ever pull that trigger if your life is not in immediate danger. If you pull that trigger you better be damn sure that there is no dispute on the fact that you were in real danger and things could not have been settled in a non-fatal manner.
23 likes@Lauren Daryani it’s legal to open carry is it not in different states? Not only that he was shoved so he prolly panicked seeing someone as big or bigger just attack him I don’t think he should’ve shot the dude but I don’t think the dude should’ve just pushed him either it’s all stupid.
6 likesIs this a normal emotional state of someone who just shot and killed someone because he feared for his life? No emotion of fear or shooting or killing, just another day. Just another life.
4 likesHe is a normal dude. Regular people like him shouldn't be able to ever have a gun. Just make guns illegal for normal people and stuff like this doesn't happen. It's either that or tragedies such as this one will keep coming, 1 father dies and another father gets sent to prison.
15 likes@Lauren Daryani he didn't rant at the couple. He told the girl to move out of the spot the car was illegally parked in, the man came out and pushed him to the ground from behind.
4 likes@Offilaw Noone you sound as if you've never held a gun
4 likes@Lukas Lu yeah, that way when a criminal that doesn't care about the law comes into your house you can't defend yourself! Super smart
14 likes@tie the noose Doesn't change the fact that normal people can't be trusted with guns or these situations will keep happening. If guns were illegal these children doesn't lose their father and a normal guy doesn't get thrown in jail. Just stating facts here. What happens in a potential burglar case and wether you have a gun or not is irrelevant. But someone dying in such a case if no gun is involved is highly unikely.
7 likes@Lukas Lu and the chance of an innocent man dying in a mugging are much higher if people can't arm themselves. Don't take this one example out of the hundreds of thousands to make an argument against every single responsible gun owner.
10 likes@Lukas Lu wanna talk facts? Guns stop an estimated 1-2.5 million crimes every year. The only thing taking away guns does is give more power to corrupt cops, criminals and people that plan to take advantage of others.
10 likes@Lukas Lu I have several guns, I myself had actually stopped a man from raping my cousin and someone trying to break into my house. If you want to get anecdotal, we can do that. Just because Michael misused his guns doesn't mean every law-abiding citizen needs to get punished. I can understand making classes compulsory if you are purchasing a gun, but not taking the guns away.
6 likes@Lukas Lu so the overall crime rate is 7x higher but the gun-related crime is only 2x higher? That is AT best a correlation and not a causation which is how you seem to be explaining it. The crime rate is higher for a lot of different reasons than gun control. And comparing one country, regardless of size, to an average of over a dozen is a poor way to compare.
7 likes@tie the noose My comparison was merely a response to you claiming that guns somehow would prevent crimes rather then cause them. Even though there may be other reasons to your comparativly high crime rates I highly doubt the whole gun situation isn't one of the major ones. I understand where you are coming from though. If I were to live in a society such as the US I would probably prefer being armed myself. But that doesn't change the fact that putting firearms in the hands of normal citizens kill people.
5 likes@Lukas Lu I never said all guns would be used to stop crimes and never be used to cause them.
5 likes@Lukas Lu and it isn't that guns "somehow" stop crime/would. They have and still will here and of course guns will still be used to commit them, but that is in every country (I understand the US has more). I'm glad you can at least see how here you'd want to be armed
4 likes@elijah fox exactly!!!! My husband is a licensed carrier and he would never do what this guy did.
1 likeAs an outsider, America has a gun problem and needs to deal with these types of people getting hold of weapons.
4 likes@nightw4tchman As an outsider, your opinion carries no weight with most people in America. It doesn't matter which country you're from or currently live in either
8 likes@Lukas Lu Sometimes its best to look at the bigger picture. The shooter getting beaten to a pulp and dying would have been a tragedy, but the gun saved his life. His decision making after the gun was pulled is where fault lies.
6 likesAbsolutely
0 likes@Stephen Paddock ?
5 likesI am looking at the bigger picture? America would be a better place without all the guns, doesn't matter if this guy would die without it in this situation.
@Stephen Paddock Although I highly doubt his life was truly in danger in that situation. He wasnt cornered by a common thief with nothing to lose but by a family man just trying to protect his loved ones. The guy clearly overreacted given how hard he got shoved to the ground. But it is highly unlikely anyone would die in that situation if it weren't for the gun, that much is obvious.
6 likesNoone should own a fkin gun
0 likes@skithe00 🤡
1 like@Paul Cowherd Exactly, people often try to shift blame every chance they get. Some times it's just human error, we wont be able to always make the right decisions and nobody should prosecuted for that. If the boyfriend lived i think nobody would make a big deal out of the situation.
0 likesCouldn’t of said it any better & that’s what makes you a YouTube hero!
1 likeI'm a HARD 2 AMENDMENT supporter, I agree with you to some point, no one can determine that for sure on others. And, no one should loose their right to bare arms because of this schmuck.
3 likes@Lauren Daryani, he apparently has a long history of being a "hall monitor" so to say.
2 likes@skithe00 Many more lives are saved by guns each year than taken. Mine included. It's a right that should not be infringed upon. We have a right to defend ourselves. Govt gun grabs only remove guns from law abiding citizens, not criminals.
4 likesAnd absolutely, we should leave ourselves completely helpless to Govt because Gov't is trustworthy and always here to help, right?
Violent crime rates typically increase when guns are removed from society.
More people die by knives than guns; should we remove those too?
@• Monkey Matters • This is the mindset people from actual industrial states are laughing about. Look at the UK or Germany. You think people there dont need to protect themselves? America will stay a joke until you guys work on your priorities.
0 likes@• Monkey Matters • Really REALLY good point you make here, honestly I can’t help but agree with you.
1 like@Lukas Lu Guns are illegal in Mexico and yet there are still massive gun battles that involve crew served machine guns, rocket propelled grenades, hand grenades, and firearms that are even illegal in the US. Cartels ride around with .50 cal machine guns mounted to their vehicles. Murder is already illegal yet it happens anyway. It's almost as if criminals don't give a damn about the law.
4 likes@GRAPE Jam 67 I completely disagree.
0 likes@GRAPE Jam 67 You just call every one you disagree with a trump supporter, like thats an insult lol
2 likes@Jellyfish Josh you clearly cannot comprehend my POV so stop trying
0 likes@GRAPE Jam 67 Trump 2024
1 like@Stephen Paddock no beating. Fantasy to justify murder.
0 likes@Cuzinnn McGee Any sensible person would just walk away from the situation but ego comes into play and the guy escalates the situation by physically attacking. Lack of confidence and low IQ were abundant.
2 likes@Stephen Paddock Stephen, there is no doubt in my mind that Drejka would have opened fire on the victim even if he hadn’t been touched. That’s what wannabe snowflakes do. It’s their fantasy.
1 like@Beardly 01 it’s just sad that you have to compare Mexico with the U.S.
0 likes@tie the noose wrong. This is the type of bogus nonsense that drives the firearm industry to record setting sales of their inventory. Don’t believe the NRA propaganda.
0 likes@Cuzinnn McGee I'm confused propaganda you're referring to.
1 like@Cuzinnn McGee I have also never read anything the NRA has put out. I educated myself pretty well and from varied sources
2 likes@Cuzinnn McGee Oh I100% believe you, as thinking with emotion has become more common, you are a shining example. I prefer facts and logic over emotional response.
3 likes@Lauren Daryani he ways brings it
0 likesBro you really think they guy who parked in a handicap spot when he wasn’t handicapped and then through a man on the ground for being confronted ab that . is in the right ?
3 likes@Offilaw Noone "Most gun owners who are not professional or hunters are pathetic weak people...."
1 likeWhat an absolutely asinine statement.
@skithe00 "Look at the UK...." Yes, look at the UK, a virtual police state at this point, that could go topsy-turvy at any moment, and the people are defenseless.
1 like@Heidi Schultz ja natürlich benutzen die Messer oder schlagen Leute. Es wird immer Kriminalität geben. Was schusswaffen allerdings bewirken ist eine Vereinfachung von Mord oder können Sie sich etwa nicht vorstellen, dass ein Mord sehr viel einfacher mit einer Pistole als mit einem Messer von der Hand geht ?
1 like@Beardly 01
0 likesWhere do you think these weapons come from? Maybe you think the cartels in Mexico import their weapons from China like with everything else? Guns are imbued in the American culture and its economy. Weapons manufactured for use both in the US-military and the public market obviously gets smuggled across the border in the same way drugs are. The criminals are responsible for performing the crimes, sure. But it is your culture and laws that allow them to have access to their armaments in the first place.
@Stephen Paddock The reason these types of offenders often are "family men" speaks to my point. Just another proof of why it is generally a bad idea to give these people easy access to deadly weaponry. It doesn't take much for someone to aim a gun at someone else and pull the trigger, anyone could do it depending on the situation. Take the gun out of the equation and it's an entire different situation since stabbing or beating someone to death is not even comparable to shooting someone. The reason your "family men" is killing eachother more then in other countries is because they have guns, end of discussion. Say it's a price to pay for your freedom instead. Atleast that's an intellectually defendable viewpoint and something I would be able to accept.
1 like@Lukas Lu it's funny that you mentioned China and then immediately dismissed it. Are you familiar with Norinco??? We can't get Norinco in the US ever since Tiananmen square yet somehow fully automatic Norinco rifles show up in Mexico all the time. Yes, some guns do cross the border from the US but the automatics are coming from elsewhere for the most part.
1 like@Stephen Paddock You call me overly emotional and illogical when I'm the one with the facts, if anything that is just comical. All I'm saying is that if you put guns in the hands of the regular population accidents such as this one is more likely to escalate into deadly violence. This is then proven by the numbers and statistics of said accidents in your country. You are the one desperatly trying to defend this mans right to have a gun in the first place, with no other argument other then saying that he could have died without it. Which is a rather extreme example of speculation that is obviously based on your own beliefs and culture. In contrast when did I ever "speculate" about anything?
1 likeWhat exactly are you trying to prove with your nonsentical argumentation? That your gun-laws somehow make your people safer? Just look at your numbers and it is easy to see that this isn't the case. I'm sure it makes you personally feel safer and also gives you more control over the safety of others around you but you seem to be blind to the fact that when anyone around you could wear a gun that makes your surroundings more deadly aswell. Again, you are for some reason calling me sensitive, slow and speculative when I'm literally trying to give you the intellectually defendable arguments for your own stance on the topic. Resorting to personal attacks, especially when they make absolutely zero sense what so ever is a clear indication that you don't have anything else to say so please just don't. Listen, you ARE entitled to having a gun, I'm not trying to take that away from anyone. But you need to accept the fact that situations such as this one is a direct correalation to said entitlement or else you are just being an ignorant and selfish prick.
@Beardly 01 When googling the matter it seems to me that the Norinco brand is commonly used by the mexican army. Therefore I don't see why it would be strange for that brand to also show in the hands of the cartels and other criminals. Still, all the numbers I could find was that most firearms confiscated comes from the US and smuggled across the border.
0 likesBut does it really matter where the guns come from when the problem is your attitude towards them?
This is basically the reason why you can’t have guns here in Germany unless you’re a hunter or any kind of law enforcement. The amount of shootings here is as low as the IQ of the guy being interrogated.
0 likesMy wife and I are armed and we are terrified with the prospect of ever having to actually pull the trigger. My wife deterred a would be attacker by pointing it at him after he grabbed her arm and she swung around and palmed him in the nose which gave her time to draw. She had been walking alone at night in an off site hospital parking lot as she was staying with me in my hospital room on a lumpy cot as she refused to leave me alone there. She had been my girlfriend at the time. She didn't tell me about it until well after I was released from my six month hospital stay.
2 likes@Lukas Lu lmao that's some piss poor google-fu you've done there. The Mexican army is not equipped with Norinco brand small arms. Most of their equipment is made either by the German company Heckler & Koch, the Belgian company FN Herstal, their own domestic arms industry and some M16 variants from the US.
1 likeThey're not equipped with Norinco AK47s. Furthermore Norinco clones every popular pattern rifle e.g. M16s and others.
My attitude towards guns has absolutely no impact on drug cartels in Mexico but nice try at deflecting. In fact I'd go as far to say that the US does not have a major gun crime issue. Europe has had more deadly mass shootings than those in the US and they have extremely strict gun laws. The vast majority of the US has literally no issue with gun crime including the areas with the highest per capita gun ownership. We have like 4 cities that account for the vast majority of the gun crime in the US and the people commiting violent acts with guns are already in violation of our existing gun laws. Just like how during alcohol prohibition people still somehow found a way to get drunk and how during drug prohibition people still find a way to get high.
Of course, you'd think that it was not self defence, but nobody would like to have their head stomped on the parking lot. He had no choice.
0 likes@Beardly 01 Whatever you say man, choosing between believing an online article or a guy in the comment section is about the same thing I guess. Its whatever anyway. But bro you have like 10 times more gun-related deaths in the states and mexico when compared to developed European nations. If you don't think thats an issue I can't see why I would continue bother arguing with you.
1 like@Beardly 01 But sure, it might be unfair to compare the US as a whole considering that the tallies and laws regarding guns are so different depending on the state. It's the culturally ingraved belief that you need rights to weapons that is my issue.
0 likesIt wouldn't be a problem in itself if not for the fact that people are idiotic, selfish and emotional. If put in a stressful situation such as this one some might handle it poorly, which results in unnecessary deaths. If anyone that can get hold of a gun can be put in this situation and pull the trigger something is wrong since it could have been conpletely avoided simply by removing the gun from the situation.
The problem is, how can you tell him apart from everyone else when he comes to buy a gun and apply for a permit? You can't tell who should have a gun and who shouldn't just by looking at them. You'll only know that after he has shot and killed someone. So, perhaps no one should have a gun in the first place, no?
2 likes@Lukas Lu You'd fit right in with all the dictatorships in history, sheep.
1 like@Hickory45acp But honestly man.. Where did you get ridiculous idea from? And how can I be a sheep and a dictator at the same time...
0 likesThis might be the dumbest comment I have ever seen anyone make on the internet. Congratz man.
@Hickory45acp Eh, what???
0 likesDon't just come here and throw insults at people for no reason what so ever. Atleast try and take part in the discussion first. Normally this is how people settle their disputes.
Look bro, I have no idea why your brain seem to have exploaded with emotion but try and calm yourself down a bit.
@Lukas Lu lol you're telling me to calm down when you're the one having a conniption fit because I criticized you on how you are incompetent about the right to bare arms. I have a differing opinion to yours to which I expressed it. My freedom pal just like the the right to bare arms is my freedom too. Bet that really infuriates you :)
0 likes@Lukas Lu it's funny to see how you also deleted your comment about you freaking out in order to cover your tracks
0 likes@Hickory45acp When I'm reading your comments I can literally feel your anger seeping in from between the lines, you are not very good at hiding it.
0 likesIf you actually read through my comments you would know that I actually don't want to take your freedom to carry firearms from you. That wouldn't be realistic. You missed the main talking points by about a mile bro. But hey, atleast you explained your own stance on the matter this time before continuing to disrespect me with your made-up remarks. An improvement to say the least.
Also, the comment I removed was just me laughing at the absurdity of your comment. I could write it out again if you really want me to.
@Offilaw Noone I think some wish this were the wild Wild West again.
0 likesI could not agree more.
0 likes@Lukas Lu this guy is not a normal dude lmao. This guy is the type of guy in class when he reaches for his backpack everyone takes a deep breath and crosses their fingers.
0 likesGee, really Dumbo?
0 likes@Lauren Daryani ranting at a young woman
0 likes@Tyler Noble Haha yea, true.
0 likesMost likely just a troll though.
@Michael Watson with paid leave an pension too....
0 likes@Lukas Lu America can be better without gun? That’s laughable. You use Europe as an example without realizing it goes from one dictator to the next while the US didn’t. Now you don’t have freedom of speech also because you’d rather put someone in jail than having someone being offended. Sure it’s safer to put under control everyone you deem dangerous. But safety should never triumph rights. Never use people as a mean to an end. I used to be like you.
0 likes@Thien Nhat La Removing your rights to carry guns will not solve anything, I also never said that it would. I'm just acknowledging that there is a problem since everyone wants to ignore it. Also, as I just said it is unfair to compare the situation over there to europe since every nation here is so different. All I can do then is relate to myself and where I live. In doing that it becomes quite obvious what your issues are.
0 likesThen I really don't know what you are talking about when mentioning dictators in Europe. You could maybe argue that Putin is one but I'd still prefer him over the kind of people you vote into power.
@Lukas Lu Not in the modern time, but since the US was created, there have been several dictators in Europe. The gun law was created to prevent dictators. Seriously, the US just can’t become a totalitarian government because the citizens hold most guns, they might not win against the military but a military take over will just cost too much for them to consider. The gun rights also make the US impossible to be invaded.
1 like@Lukas Lu All nations are different? Is it as different as each US state to each other? The US is like Europe 2.0 more diverse, yet more functional. There are states that have the best education in the world where you are require to be fluent in 3 languages to graduate high school and there are states that are agriculturally oriented so people don’t go to college as much. Europe isn’t empires anymore, yet that condescending attitude that make them think their culture is better and they try to change other cultures is still there and you are an example.
0 likes@Thien Nhat La I'm not going to pretend that I know how things are in the different states compared to one another. I don't know that much other then what I can read online. But here in Europe we literally have some of the richest and poorest countries in the world at the same time. The cultural differences between borders is also massive. I don't doubt that there are significant differences between your states but definitly not to the extent that exists in Europe and its nations. I'm not saying that either cases are better or worse, just that it is unfair to compare the two.
0 likesWhen I was younger I used to really look up to your nation and what it stood for. The concept and idea behind the economy really intrigued me. In most ways it still does. But nowadays I'm just constantly finding traces of more corruption and injustice on a daily basis.
0 likesI definitly do not think of myself as better than you guys, but I do pity your people and the ones that have to live under such stressful conditions when the potential of your nation is so much higher. Way higher then anywhere else.
@Lukas Lu Do you notice when you buy things from American companies, they don’t include VAT? that’s because each state has a different VAT. Not just VAT, the whole tax system of every state is different. Each state also has its own state government with its own laws because every power not granted to the federal government is preserved for the states. Each state has different accent and cultures. You will need to take into consideration which state the person come from to adjust they way you speak to them. Some states are crazy and wild but friendly and some are polite and highly educated. The street cultures, food, working cultures are also different. Some state are so wealthy that if they secede they would be in top richest countries while some states are very poor. You know most of these states used to belong to other countries. They still have the old cultures before the merge. That adds to the European root, the diversity in ethnicities, the influence of the native American cultures, and the geographical differences in every state make the US culture very complex.
0 likesGod, that CCTV footage is insane. Dude looks a man in the eyes, sees the man backing away, and shoots to kill anyway. Monstrous.
342 likesReplies (12)
He deserves longer than 20 years.
28 likesHe'd been carrying a gun for 26 years waiting for his chance to use it. This was his dream come true and he wasn't about to let it slip away.
44 likes@Darren Smith i completely agree! he’s so embarrassing to watch
4 likes@Carlos Jimenez and with recent "hold your ground laws" increasing across the US, it's far more likely for people like him to get away with this.... Just have to call 911 and say "I was afraid for my life and had to defend myself", then get a lawyer (the NRA is happy to help)
2 likesIts self defense
1 like@Ingmar Van olffen it’s like you didn’t even watch the video. Did you watch it on mute? Or space out? You clearly missed some key points if you think this murderer is in the right.
8 likes@Ingmar Van olffen he KILLED, too a mans LIFE in front of his own FAMILY.
0 likesEhhh, that's why you don't go around just attacking people like that. If someone just charges you and throws you to the ground out of nowhere, it's not unreasonable to assume they will do something else to further harm or even kill you. The guy would still be alive if he didn't attack this guy, let's not completely shift the blame here.
1 like@Melz Is Weird The guy shouldn't have attacked him and he would still be alive
0 likes@xXSgtWolfXx I don’t think that’s how it works... you can’t shoot people backing away
2 likes@Carlos Jimenez so sick
0 likes@P. Roud Tobi Mi A random dude is shouting at your wife and your kid, of which you don't know anything of the context. You come into the situation only seeing a guy with his back to you shouting at your family. Anyone who doesn't get physical has more patience, but brandishing anyone who shoves Michael in this scenario is not "an absolute douchebag" and to frame it this way is to just be a complete asshole. Patience is a virtue, but there are many shades of grey here. If the victim went for a punch or some other strike, sure. But he didn't, he pushed him. Michael just happens to be a small guy with poor balance.
0 likesI love these shows but who else is developing a fear of potentially being a suspect in a crime you never committed and then having these really well trained detectives poke holes in a true story, causing doubt, leading to your death sentence or lifelong imprisonment.
1202 likesReplies (94)
🙋🏾♀️
34 likesThat's why the cheat is, you should never ever agree to talk to the cops
134 likesYes, me too!
3 likes@Moetez Ouelhazi This. It baffles me that everyone is just blabbing away, no one asks for a lawyer, no one refuses to answer. Most likely because it would make them suspicious - but they are suspects to begin with. If you don't say anything, nothing can be used against you.
81 likesHowever, I am glad most do blab away making it easy for the detectives so they can rot in prison for the rest of their lives.
Well he should have just said one word "Lawyer".
16 likesI'll just shut up as soon as they read me my Rights 🤐🤫
5 likesYes!! But I've also learned from these videos just how crucial the word LAWYER is!!
9 likesMy Anxiety has entered the chat
15 likesI swear, all these meticulous notes are NOT for the purposes of trying to get away with anything, have an advantage in the interrogation or get one over. I’ll never be in that situation, (God! I hope I’ll never be in that situation.) (Makes more notes.)
2 likes@NPC_1138 we aren’t seeing those. Our host is giving us the interesting ones. The boring, “I’m taking the 5th’s are filtered out so it seems like everyone is stupid. But I totally agree with you.
8 likesThe only thing you ever say to law enforcement is you want a lawyer.
1 like@NPC_1138 its because innocent people think they have no use for a lawyer,because they are innocent,so wasting time on a lawyer may seem like a waste of time to them
0 likes@Y AB That's a weak explanation because as we can see, many guilty people also do not ask for a lawyer.
4 likesDONT TALK TO THE POLICE
2 likesHahahaha 😂
0 likes@Y AB and the guilty feel it would be suspicious to immediately ask for one
2 likesHe didn’t think he needed a lawyer because he killed a black man and thought the detectives would automatically be on his side lol he used words like ‘immediate threat’ and even suggests that the black woman was a potential threat!! He’s racist end of!
3 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likesNo. I'm just watching to learn how to interrogate liars, be strong.
1 like@Alexander insubordinate lol nice
0 likesif you are a master troller, you can poke holes in their logic and then start manipulating your story to sound more like the life of the detective. just be like "oh i was just taking a walk"
0 likes"ok you got me, i was actually on my way to work to conduct interviews"
"ok you got me, i'm actually an undercover detective that conducts interrogations, and this one guy i once interrogated kept changing his story and he started pretending like he was a detective or somethin', crazy i know."
They'd pull me apart in 5 mins even if. I was totally innocent.. Id come away thinking i did do that 😂
3 likesIf I were a suspect I would want competent detectives, because they would be able to confirm my innocence.
0 likesThat is a valid fear, which is why you never ever ever speak to cops without a lawyer, unless someone's life is in immediate danger and you have information.
1 likeI am a criminal justice major and I am not a genius by any means but if you’re self aware and have a form of protection you’re ok. Victimisation is not as likely as you think
0 likesWhen the cop quips about how attractive he is, ask for a lawyer!
1 likeIt’s called don’t answer questions without legal council
1 likeI’m sure those who have later been exonerated wish they hadn’t said a word to the police. People really do make false confessions under the pressure of a police interrogation.
3 likesI actually feel more confident that they would believe my true story after watching these. I always thought holding in emotion and being matter of fact was best to hurry and eliminate yourself and the actual culprit can be found. It seems that lack of affect and appropriate response makes you look guilty tho. Now I know.
0 likesI just ask for my lawyer, no information for these well trained detectives, just stay silent 😂
1 likeYeah and also your google and YouTube search history will be used against you! It will show as evidence that you were researching ways to avoid being found guilty of your obvious future crimes!!! ;-)
0 likesWell-trained detectives - AND indisputable video proof.
0 likes@Blu bell Quickly, he said the magic word! Run!
0 likesNaa not really
0 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likesRight, lol
0 likesjust remember: stick to truth always. your heart knows the truth and eventually it will always come out for others to know.
0 likes@Yahya Duale You'd think so, did you watch Stephanie Lazarus, shes Investigator herself, and these guys cracked her.
1 like@Moetez Ouelhazi Better cheat is not shooting anyone ;)
0 likesI FEAR IT EVERY SINGLE SECOND!!!
0 likes@Jaden Halstead get a great attorney
0 likes@NPC_1138 As long as they are guilty
0 likes@mozzy5150 He's like well I'm calm, I know whats going on, I identify as white and these guys are chill so I'll be alright
0 likesif you didn't do it, you didn't do it.
0 likesIf you allow cops to believe you did a crime you were innocent of, and couldn't even prove your case enough to keep you away from being a suspect... you are stupid enough to go to jail anyways.
It’s all fine by me guys, that he should have stayed silent.. I guess you ' Trump' fans next thought would be like: He’s soft he only fired 1 time...
0 likesThis only occurs when they have evidence. In every video on the channel, the investigators had some piece of critical evidence they dropped towards the end of the interview. But even if you did end up in this spot you keep your mouth shut and don't say anything. Don't even nod or move your head just stare up at the ceiling and close your eyes. You don't have to answer them and you have every right to demand your lawyer be present. It is foolish to speak without a lawyer
0 likesThat's why you get a lawyer for questioning!
0 likesI think I've learned I don't speak to an officer without a lawyer.
0 likesThe guy started as an aggressor and ended up as a murderer. Paul, what business did he have confronting that woman? Now there is a widow ...and fatherless children and it all started because of a parking slot? Yet he had already parked his own car? Hope he stays locked up for a long long time, may have some sense in him when he comes out. Sad for all of the people involved though.
0 likesall the time
0 likesSAY NOTHING TO THE COPS! lol
0 likesNever speak to cops without legal council. Even if you are innocent. Even if you have an unquestionable alibi. Even if you are just a witness.
0 likes@Porpois Stanley Never shoot people in the streets over minute issues like parking without legal counsel sounds great.
0 likes@Mariel Nice people who have good intentions must always talk openly, frankly and truthfully to all COPS. LOLEST.
0 likesNo.🙄
0 likes@Porpois Stanley You don't need to speak to the cops even when you have an attorney; he/she would speak for you.
0 likeswelcome to America buddy, now you know how it feels to be a minority in a police state
0 likes@Josh Murphy tell us more about how minorities are not treated with kids gloves else there will be numerous lawsuits against the departments alleged to be responsible by various minority action groups?
0 likesNever talk to a cop without the presence of a lawyer.
0 likesThis dude was soft. Cant fight but because he buys a gun feels like he can get in peoples face...that gun gave him courage. Not his manhood. How many commenters here cant fight but walk around feeling brave with a gun...go to the gym cowards...
0 likesThat's why you should always invoke your 5th adement right away and don't talk to cops untill you get a lawyer.
0 likesAsk if I’m being arrested if I’m not leave. And if I am being arrested Plead the fifth and get my lawyer down there ASAP.
1 likeOmg I thought there was something wrong with me!
0 likesOr you could just invoke your right to remain silent and let the lawyers haah it out.
1 likeI've been thinking about it for yeaaaars like imagine I get arrested and they send me to prison for something I know I didn't do
0 likesTrue but this guy was guilty you can tell in the video it was ego that made him shoot. He was heated that the guy pushed him soo hard. The guy stepped away as soon as he saw the gun. This guy was the one being confrontational in the first place
0 likesdo not go out at night bad things happen at night
0 likesthe truth is in the video
0 likesThanks a lot Paul.
1 likeSincerely ,
Anxiety
Lol! Watch his false imprisonment video ;)
0 likesI have pretty bad memory issues. But I can tell you that, if you are present for something traumatic enough to be facing life in prison/death sentence chances are, every millisecond will be engraved in your memory.
0 likesWith that said, also just like don't talk to them. Say I understand my rights. I am innocent. I would like to speak to a lawyer. I also would like a coke. Thank you.
@Moetez Ouelhazi pull a Jeff lol
0 likesTrue but most will panic and forget all that
0 likes@Quanyai Terrell I know right?!
1 likeThat's why you potentially need to say nothing at all and ask for an attorney immediately. You wouldn't be the first second third or fourth innocent person in prison because cops twisted their story against them. There's a whole league of lawyers that have to work their ass off getting them out of prison and not all get out. Not even most get out. The Innocence Project.
0 likes@blobsndrees detectives are NEVER there to confirm your innocence. Never! They would get fired if they went into interrogations trying to confirm the suspect's innocence. Don't get silly and start thinking like that. Your LAWYER is there to confirm your innocence and you should stfu immediately and ask for one or you are going to be in for quite a surprise about the officer's "competence". They are going to do their job and bust you the first chance they get.
0 likesTheres a video on this exact same channel that speaks more to that exact scenario you laid out.
0 likesYou have the right to remain silent. Let the lawyers/court figure out if yo are guilty or not. No need to help the cops/prosecuting attorney. Never ends well when people do thinking its ok because they didn't do anything wrong.
0 likesThat’s why as soon as they start asking questions and read you rights you only say “lawyer”
0 likesYou smoke to much
0 likesHey don’t you eat some botty
0 likesLol your Dunn’s
0 likesLol my store his taxes pay for that
0 likesMet head only
0 likesYou got some skeletons in your closet aye? 😂😂😂 Better get to studying these videos!!
0 likes@Fee Narvaez thats step 2.... step 1 is get rich
0 likesThats why you get a lawyer... they can be well trained but so can you.....
0 likesIt’s needs evidence to back it up as well
0 likesNo.
0 likesSmall people with big guns and no life. Except prison life I guess
0 likesIf I ever get to visit an interrogation room, I’ll be seeking counsel immediately! Lol
0 likesThese people are clearly astray and brainsashed severely by the education system and TV
0 likesThe fact you posted this statement means you have done something wrong. Do you need a personal/safe "describer."
0 likesHappened to me, I got done for drink driving and theft of motor vehicle when I was 15 and I told the whole truth and the judge called me a compulsive liar and sentenced me, was the day I realised you can't trust anyone not even the justice system.
0 likesYou can tell from the second the interview starts, he thinks he is getting away with it. The confidence and entitlement is screaming through the screen. Fascinating.
158 likesReplies (11)
l know right? lt was surprising to me how confident he was despite how damning the footage was for him.
9 likesHis confidence and entitlement got someone murdered. Its astounding. May he rot in prison for the rest of his life.
10 likesTemps I wouldn’t say entitlement. Ignorance really.
0 likesIs that the same as the "confidence and entitlement " of believing you can park in a handicap zone?
3 likes@A T They definitely shouldn't have parked there. No arguments there but he shouldn't have killed a guy for doing so!
4 likes@A T Thanks A T. Also I like saying A T. Has a great ring to it. Makes me feel like we're old friends.
0 likes@A T lol park in handicap spot without handicap decal = death sentence. makes sense. clearly these two actions are the same. /s
7 likes@A T Then the jury felt entitled to finding him guilty for manslaughter and the prosecution felt entitled to ask for the max sentencing.
3 likes@A T Just finishing where you left off.
2 likesHis last comment was so stupid, he deletes all of them. Wise.
4 likes@princesstamika just gonna ignore the part where he was assaulted first? Typical.
0 likesDrejka's issue is that he's a pretend soldier who wanted to put himself in a 'life or death scenario' so he could live out his fantasy. He uses military language like 'neutralize the threat' and brought his gun everywhere, deliberately seeking conflict in the hopes that he would get a chance to shoot someone.
509 likesReplies (20)
Force multiplier 😂😂😂
20 likesHe got 20 to life tho. That's what people get when they plot and kill their wife in her sleep. Obviously what he did was wrong but it wasn't premeditated and it was provoked by violence. That's manslaughter at best. That 3-10 years.
5 likes@Eric G Because he killed someone when they were demonstrably not a threat to him. And it was also demonstrated in the video that he habitually put himself in these situations. This conflict didn't happen by accident. He orchestrated it to happen.
37 likesYes. Prob listens to police radios all day
11 likesRoger that.
6 likes@Eric G he started the confrontation with the woman sat in the car with her kids. The dad saw this and pushed him away. This guy pulls out his gun. Points it, the dad actually steps back away and then shot. This wannabe law inforcer just wanted a reason to shoot someone. He feels so utterly inferior he has to patrol the disabled spots at "his store" and he shoots an unarmed man who is now backing away.
20 likes@Izzy Kitty I really don't wanna be defending this guy so I'm gonna just shut up but my point is that it was obviously not premeditated and he was not the aggressor. Yelling at someone for parking in a handicap is not the same as initiating violence. He may have been the original verbal aggressor and started the confrontation but he did not escalate it. When he was physically assaulted that's when the confrontation was wrongfully escalated to violence and then subsequently he unlawfully escalated further violence. He is dead wrong for that but again, it was not premeditated and nor was it unprovoked.
2 likes@Izzy Kitty I really don't wanna be defending this guy so I'm gonna just shut up but my point is that it was obviously not premeditated and he was not the aggressor. Yelling at someone for parking in a handicap is not the same as initiating violence. He may have been the original verbal aggressor and started the confrontation but he did not escalate it. When he was physically assaulted that's when the confrontation was wrongfully escalated to violence and then subsequently he unlawfully escalated further violence. He is dead wrong for that but again, it was not premeditated and nor was it unprovoked.
0 likesGimme a B
1 likeGimme a I
Gimme a N
Gimme a G
Gimme a O
It’s interesting to not that done view his taking out his weapon was not being an aggressor.
0 likesStrange that.
He also got out of his vehicle to play cop of the world.
Also, he has a history of aggression.
He was looking for trouble & he got his wish.
He watched a few episodes of ASP and thinks he’s a marine.
0 likes@Eric G I think it was premeditated if he went out armed and started an argument in the hope he'd get to shoot someone
3 likes@stewqrt rankin u need proof that he left home with a pre arranged plan to kill. You need evidence of planning. That's why the DA didn't charge first degree because he couldn't prove premeditation. My point is he was sentenced as if it was premeditated even though he wasnt charged with premeditated murder.
0 likesEric G
2 likesSorry mate ... I had to reply to your assertion that this shooter “wasn’t the aggressor” ...
I’m guessing that you aren’t a father yet , because no father would say what you did .
If my wife and children ( I have 3 ) are approached by some belligerent , imma do exactly the same the now-dead father did .
When you have a woman you love to death and children you love to death , you will understand ✌️
You’re right, there’s had people like this. That’s why people always say be careful who you mess with.
0 likesEric G Premeditation does not, under US law, have to occur in advance of a crime. From the Wikipedia entry on "malice aforethought" (which is another term for premeditation) wherein the 4 categories of malice aforethought are described: "It is easiest to break these categories up by premeditation, or express malice and reckless endangerment, or implied malice. Intent to kill or to inflict serious bodily injury would be considered express. This does not mean that the accused made a plan far in advance, but it could even be in the moment of the crime. If the person did the action knowing it would hurt or kill the other person, there was express malice involved, which is a form of malice aforethought.
2 likesEric G he was known to start fights before. The store owner has complained before of him starting confrontations and harassing customers in the past. He carries a gun and starts fights, why do you think he does that?
3 likes@Eric G He started something in an aggravated fashion he knew he could potentially kill in and as soon as he was challenged he shot to kill. To my eyes he looks like a bully and a wimp, 2 things I don't like. Was it in cold blood? No. But apart from that this guy killed a father in front of his family over an incident he started. He's a terrible human being.
2 likesYeah you hit the nail on the head here.
0 likes@Gary Vlahos actually if u knew my wife she would have been punching him before I could even get a chance to push him lol.
0 likesHere's the thing that is terrifying to me. This guy openly admits that he was not in fear for his life. He openly admits that he knew the confrontation he started could get physical. But he's not worried because he's just going to turn around and kill anyone who lays a finger on him. The scary part isn't so much that he feels justified in doing this. Murderers feel justified all the time. What is truly freaky to me is that he clearly believed that the law was going to be on his side. He truly believed he had the legal right to end somebody's life because he got a scrape on the elbow and was worried he might get some more. That level of unthinking entitlement is astounding to me.
3845 likesAnd he keeps himself separated from the reality of what he is risking and doing by using euphemisms. "Neutralizing the threat" sounds cooler than "murdering a father in front of his children," I guess.
And it's not just the fact that he killed the guy attacking him. When you bring a gun into the equation, someone who was not your intended target could get hit. You can kill bystanders. There were children there that could have gotten injured or killed.
If you're going to start shit with strangers, you need to accept the fact that you might get your ass kicked. A gun is not supposed to be an all access pass that allows you to provoke people when you're angry without suffering any consequences yourself. A gun is not a tool for winning arguments. A gun is not a tool for manipulating others into doing what you want.
What an absolute garbage human being. Why does this make me so much angrier that some of the other cases on here?
Replies (264)
👆🏿^^^^^^^^^^THIS RIGHT HRE^^^^^^^👆🏿
203 likesWell no... you don't have to accept you'll get your ass kicked, the other guy pushed him first, humans aren't all the same or have the same combat experience so why should they play by your stupid rules of self defense and get into a fight they didn't consent to? In saying that...the shooting in this incident was not justified, it was revenge, he had quite a bit of time to line up that shot when the guy backed off, it was calculated and evil
120 likesTo me this is at the core of the problem in allowing just anyone to carry firearms in public - it emboldens them to get into situations they wouldn’t have gotten themselves into if unarmed and once they are in that situation nothing says they’ll have the cool to correctly judge how to use the weapon nor the skills to use it safely.
219 likes@Anthony Dunkley I think you’re missing a key point here…the shooter wasn’t just minding his business when he was pushed.
248 likesHe was in a shouting match with the victim’s girlfriend. This was a confrontation he provoked. It was a confrontation HE thought COULD get physical.
I haven’t been in a fight for almost thirty years. But if I were to get into a loud, aggressive shouting match with a stranger in public, I’m going to watch my back.
You never know who else is with them or how they’ll approach you. Maybe “accept” is the wrong word. “Expect “ is more appropriate…
What you said perfectly encapsulates my thoughts about this case. This dipshit feels empowered to play amateur cop because he believes the law is on his side.
150 likesAnd in his defense, if I were a white man living in Florida I might believe that too. The guy who killed Trayvon Martin initiated a confrontation and then killed him. He got off scot free…
Let’s be honest, these kind of situations are the INTENDED consequence of the “Stand Your Ground” laws being propagated in states around the country. That’s why this is so horrifying…
@Christiaan Ingram "the shooter wasn’t just minding his business when he was pushed. He was in a shouting match with the victim’s girlfriend. This was a confrontation he provoked. "
40 likesLiterally none of that matters in a self defense case. Had Markeis McGlockton continued to assault Michel Drejka he would have been legally justified in self defense. What ultimately put Drejka in jail wasn't the interaction with the girlfriend, it was the timing of the shot and his interview with the police. He made it clear he wasn't in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm. You say he "provoked" yet that isn't how provocation works. McGlokton coming out and pushing Drejka is a second encounter completely separate from the initial interaction with the girlfriend.
@Robu Hmmm it’s not exactly clear what your point is or why you’re making it. I bet you really impressed yourself by writing it though? 😁
75 likesI think what separates this case from the others from me is 1) that the victim’s wife and children witnessed his death. 2) the perpetrator thought the law would be on his side despite him not only also parking illegally but also killing an unarmed man in broad daylight. Two wrongs don’t make a right, as they say.
35 likes@Christiaan Ingram If I was you I wouldn't be trying to brag about my inability to comprehend English. You misrepresented the basic facts of what constitutes self defense and I replied with how self defense actually works in the legal world.
37 likesThe only thing I'll say is that he was absolutely wrong, but this is a good example of not starting fights or participating in fights in public. You never know what someone is all about
15 likes@Robu Absolutely. But lets not forget his young children were in the car as well. What kind of father would have reacted any differently? His innate defenses to protect his family kicked in and he behaved appropriately in my opinion. Any real family man would.
50 likes@Looking 4 Things Yes, but his kids being in the car is not a legal argument. Had he continued to attack Drejka it wouldn't have mattered. The initial encounter is irrelevant to the encounter that ultimately led to the shooting.
14 likes@Christiaan Ingram
27 likes1) As this case shows, you would be completely unjustified in feeling that you could kill someone and get away with it. The Trayvon Martin case is fundamentally different in that the physical evidence pointed to Martin smashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete when he was shot. It may have been morally wrong for Zimmerman to confront Martin, but not illegal. The fact that you would just ignore this part of the case demonstrates how little you truly know about it.
2) This is most certainly not the "intended consequence" of stand your ground laws. They are specifically written to exclude cases like this. Florida is a stand your ground state; the fact that Drejka was convicted directly contradicts your statement.
You made dumb comparisons and claims that are easily refuted. Not only that, you had the nerve to condescend toward people that point out how flawed your understanding of provocation is in regard to criminal law? I think you need a hard dose of self-awarness quick.
@Looking 4 Things All right, that's cool and all, but that doesn't have a bearing on the self defense argument, or why Drejka was convicted. Its not about liking legal arguments, its about reality. When somebody like Christiaan Ingram brings up and misuses provocation, it muddies the waters of eveyones understanding of what truly went wrong here.
12 likesAnd this is why you don't give anyone a gun, but only the ones that are emotionally and mentally stable enough, with thorough training and restrictions on storage so they're stored safely, where no children and no one unauthorized has access to them.
21 likesFrom a non American perspective, that these things can happen and getting shot by a possibly unstable or emotionally immature person on the street is just... Wild.
We have guns here. My dad owns a gun and always has. I have friends who do and I guarantee that most farmers have at least one too.
But these kinds of things don't happen here.
The last school shooting i recall was over 5 years ago, probably more like 7, cannot recall any other mass shooting really, and especially not someone getting killed in a case like this one.
To these weird "they wanna take away ma guns" people
No, no one wants to take away your guns unless you are mentally unstable or emotionally immature or underperform in the required training to get your license (a bit like failing a driver's test) or there's any other reason that might indicate you owning a gun has some potential to hurt yourself or others
So if you're still worried about your gun being taken away, you probably should've never owned it in the first place, because that'd mean you aren't mature or stable or qualified enough to own it.
Fkin murricans and their dystopian issues goddamn
That father should've never been shot and those kids should've never had to witness that whole incident
@Robu Actually, provocation has a great deal to do with self-defense, under 776.041.
24 likesYou might be interested in what the vague phrasing of "Initially provokes the use or threatened use of force against himself or herself" constitutes, but you can look to something like Johnson v. State, 65 So. 3d 1147 to see that an action such as banging on the back windshield of someone's car can constitute provoking a physical altercation, which will then bar the provoker from applying self-defense to their shooting in the aforementioned physical altercation.
Of course, one could argue that force provoking self-defense wasn't even applied by McGlockton, but that is also a vague line that could be argued each way.
My point with this isn't that you are necessarily wrong, but that you weren't correct in dismissing Ingram's assertions as completely false.
@The Lone Wanderer By your own definition, we can dismiss Ingram's assertions as completely false.
7 likesProvocation of force may be a vague line, but this case doesn't even approach it. The case you cited included actual physical aggression in the form of banging on someone's car. This was an argument over parking in a handicap spot. Against someone that was not even the target of the alleged self defense. A verbal argument is in no way equivalent to a physical altercation. This holds true especially in American law.
No fists were thrown. No physical aggression was made. As far as we know, no verbal threats of physical force were made either.
Drejka was most certainly in the wrong here, but not due to any sort of provocation as the law defines it.
@The Lone Wanderer 776.041 says you are allowed to defend yourself if you are in fear of great bodily harm or death even if you provoked something. If Drejka is on the ground getting attacked it dosnt really matter if anything was provoked. He would be in enough reasonable fear to defend himself.
7 likesWhatever was happening between Drejka and the girlfriend doesn't really matter because Mcglocklin hadn't seen it. He had no reason to believe Drejka was enough of a threat to his girlfriend to attack him. You can't go backwards with provocation. You can't say Drejka provoked the push with an altercation with another person that the attacker had no knowledge of.
@Junior I never meant to allege that Ingram was right, only that he wasn't completely wrong, like some others said. Provocation does have a place in U.S law.
4 likesProvocation, as defined by Cornell Law, an Ivy league law school, "'Provocation' is that which causes, at the time of the act, reason be disturbed or obscured by passion to an extent which might render ordinary persons, of average disposition, liable to act rashly or without due deliberation or reflection, and from passion, rather than judgment."
As we can see from this legal definition of provocation, someone acting in a hostile way, such as screaming point-blank at a loved one, could incite a person to be "disturbed or obscured by passion to an extent which might render ordinary persons... liable to act rashly..."
You are right, though. Nothing physical happened, although the victim had seen his loved one being yelled at. It could be argued either way, really, if provocation occurred in this instance. I never meant to assert that there was provocation, only that provocation is an important element in self-defense and that one could potentially argue it in this case.
Probably bc slavery didn’t end that long ago and this is one of the many lingering residues that it left…
7 likes@bewing77 i like it....
3 likeshad the guy not ATTACKED
Mike 1st he'd still be alive...
@Looking 4 Things a lot of people...maybe most would DE-ESCALATE & just leave !!!! keep your family safe....
2 likes@Little Loner Ahh so nice of you to put words in my mouth that I did not say instead of actually refuting my argument. Of course I have problems with mentally unstable people owning firearms. As a police officer, I consifiscate firearms off mentally unstable individuals and domestic abusers (before they're even convicted of a crime) on a normal basis. You, on the other hand, attacked Americans who rightfully believe people in the Government are coming for their guns because numerous people in the Government openly stated that as their objective. Brush up on your reading comprehension chap.
13 likes@jordan p how do you think the whole gun thing and the 3 armed robbers plays out in every other country?
10 likesAnd have you ever noticed that other countries don't have public opinions formed through fake arguments and agendas being pushed to the extreme?
Have you every like, given a thought to how other countries function or do you exclusively lap off the american plate bc y'all are so special nothing else compares?
@Little Loner So do you have any actual argument or are you just going to keep throwing personal insults? That's something who knows they clearly lost the argument and has nothing of substance to say.
7 likes@jordan p I'm sorry if questions and facts about gun regulations in other countries make you feel insulted.
12 likes@Gary Schultz A real man would have done exactly what that father did.
4 likes@Looking 4 Things A real man wouldn't run out a store and push a guy to the ground without figuring out what was going on and put his family in more danger.
11 likes@Robu 👈👈🐓
4 likes@Looking 4 Things
2 likesHes dead .... I'm alive .
So, he's obviously been to at least some conceal carry courses. He was using canned phrases from those courses. You're taught "neutralizing the threat" is a term utilized to show that you were in fear of great bodily harm or death, which you are allowed to use deadly force to protect yourself from. The thing he forgot from the CCW course is that if you are carrying, it is also your duty to try and AVOID confrontation and the people I talk to in the 2A community are all on the same page about that. When I carry I am looking to back off, and get out of there, you never want to skin that pistol unless you're certain you cannot get out of the situation safely.
7 likesA well adopted solution would be to let the police carry and put the rest in jail for possessing a gun -
6 likes@Anthony Dunkley In America; to be licensed to carry a concealed weapon is to accept responsibility for the awesome power it conveys.
19 likesYour are explicitly told to avoid confrontations, to defer from belligerent conversation, and to de-escalate non-threatening circumstances.
This is not about "Honor" or "Rules of Engagement",
This is a case of, Micheal Drejka having a history of brandishing his weapon- wrecklessly, when frustrated in public, and inevitibly shooting someone.
In this instance, during an incident that he provoked, while carrying a gun.
@jordan p Do you have a source for the claimof the "FBI attributing a quarter of a million lives saved by gun ownership"?
8 likes@Robu If I was out with someone of your mindset a criminal could attack me take my purse and knock me to the ground while you're trying to figure out legal arguments. Very scary
8 likes@Looking 4 Things Show me how that's is comparable to this situation.
6 likesIf he was gonna get "beaten" and "kicked" then he probably would've been justified imo.
11 likesHowever the guy was backing away and clearly did not want to do those things to him.
@Gary Schultz Perhaps, but you'd be behind bars
2 likes@Looking 4 Things I am Grateful that You are as direct with Your misgivings and disgust with these peoples behavior,, as You are.
3 likesTheir pretensions and rage in response to the necessary Changes of our Nation are a threat to all of us. Our Welfare, Democracy, and Empire.
@Looking 4 Things Lady, I'm literally a lawyer. I've been telling you for weeks now how this works from a legal perspective and your beloved chocolate kiwi isn't right about provocation. This weird freak out session you're having in the comments needs to stop. You're embarrassing yourself.
10 likes@Robu If you're a lawyer Im the President of the U.S.
8 likes@Looking 4 Things Well Ms. President I got my Bachelors from EWU and my JD from the University of Idaho, so its little awkward for you here.
9 likes@Robu The attorneys I know are too busy to argue with people on YouTube.
7 likes@Looking 4 Things Ah yes, 10 short comments spread across two weeks. Very time consuming.
14 likes@Robu could've been the president, man. Stop wasting so much damn time! 🙄
0 likes@Charles Gutierrez My bad. I'll be sure to work more at the job I definitley don't have.
5 likesThis video was on a self defence YT channel. Guy thought he was justified in shooting. Totally crazy to me.
4 likes@Robu didn’t ask
1 like@Racmaster00 Nephew, go pay attention in class. The grown ups are talking right now.
8 likes@Robu didn’t ask
1 like@Robu cringe
2 likes@Racmaster00 I don't believe you're aware of what a real life conversation is if you think a discussion where people dissagree is "cringe" and one party of the 10+ participating is just here because they love to argue. I suggest going outside and talking to people. It will help you once you get out of middle school.
10 likes@Nic B If we are being honest we've failed the youth of today if this is the best trolling they can produce.
4 likes@Robu ok internet warrior, keep fighting the needless fight
2 likes@Racmaster00 The irony here is almost palpable.
8 likes@Robu nice try
1 likeAgree with all this, but need to add also that the victim also started shit with a stranger and was actually the one who made it physical...
1 likeI couldn't or wouldn't have said it better!!! Except last sentence i think u ment "then not that" 2 thumbs up anyway TY
2 likes@Robu no, you really didn't.
1 like@TWW Buddy, I have a dozen comments on here. You're going to have to be a bit more specific in what you're talking about.
5 likesWell... why not? Statistically the people who think like him in such situations get to live far more than the people who do not hink like him and just sit there hoping for the best. In this instance the attacker was (probably)not going to attack a 2nd time but in many other instances the attacker goes berserk and kills the attacked.
1 likeHello he was looking for that energy ! Wen he 1st woke up this morning
0 likesI love your closing argument..you make better sense than his own lawyer.
2 likesWell by the same token, the victim also initiated a fight against a man for whom he knew nothing, he ignored whether he was carrying a gun or not. But he thought of it smart to go from behind and push him extremely violently. Now I get it, he had his kids and wife there but still the shooter was not yet aggressive, he did not do anything physical, he was just arguing with his wife. The victim thought he had the advantage coming sneakily from behind and pushing him literally flying him in the air and dropping him on the ground which of course initiate the knee-jerk reaction of taking out his gun and shooting him. Wrong to do so? Wrong of course. But we need also to remind the wrong doing of the victim no matter if it was on a lesser degree. I mean, beyond any legal concerns here, you don't go around in a country where there is high percentage of gun ownership to start physical fights like these precisely because you never know if the other person is carrying a gun.
4 likesI think in here there is a lot of racism against the white guy. If you reversed the races there would be far more people trying to find excuses for the shooter - and don't even try to say otherwise. That sneaky push from behind was extremely violent. It does not matter if it was not lethal (which could actually be in case he landed with his head down - people died by far less violent falls), it was still extremely violent and extremely vicious. If the victim just went in front of the guy between him and his wife none of that would had happened.. But the victim chose to attack from behind. The viciousness of his attack triggered the violent reaction from the shooter. Now don't get triggered by that, Ii am just explaining the basics here, I am not morally, let alone legally, justifying the shooter : this was still a murder, but not a cold-blooded one. It was a hot-blooded murder in the middle of a violent physical fight. The shooter did not kill the victim for fearing his life but rather for revenge for that vicious attack. It is clear cut.
He would come in handy now with all the carjackings going on.. 🤣🤣
1 likePretty much nailed that.
1 likeAgreed! I wouldn't be surprised if this exact thing happened but rather than a push, he yelled and grabbed his shoulder
2 likesThe thing is, the other guy felt justified to slam him against the ground
0 likes@mantenimiento Isn’t it a bit unfair to compare slamming someone to the ground to shooting someone who is backing up
10 likesIt makes you angry because a rat killed a dog after a man gave the rat a lethal dog whistle.
0 likes@Christiaan Ingram --- exactly; Drejkla was in the habit of confronting people who parked in handicapped parking without a permit. He was a self-appointed 'enforcer' going around irritating people to no good purpose.
6 likesIn other words, NOT minding his own business.
Michael heard raised voices and went outside to see Drejlka arguing with his wife.
Basically, Drejlka was harassing her --- a mom with 2 kids in a car waiting for her spouse to return. If Drejlka had let them be, Michael would have returned to the car, and the family would be on their way.
It made me feel sick to see that creep walk around the car, with a presumption that he needed to bother people who were simply going about their day.
I guess this case really bothers me more than others I've read.
@bewing77 ---- Please, please, do NOT judge law abiding citizens who have a CCP.
2 likesThis guy, Drejlka, is an idiot.
He went looking for trouble, bothering people who are simply living their lives.
He's a bully, and a dangerously ignorant one, at that.
He had NO reason to pick an argument with Michael's wife.
HE was the aggressor -- confronting and bothering people who aren't harming anyone. The parking lot was mostly empty, ffs!
People who educate themselves about firearm laws, and attend firearm safety lessons (which are required) know that carrying is not the means to solve arguments.
It's bully's like Drejlka who make the rest of the law abiding, reasonable people who carry look bad.
He is the exception, not the rule.
@Gabriel Huss THIS ONE
0 likes@Little Loner well said 👏
0 likes@Soraya Kapetti So, genuine question. If I blindsided you, pushed you to the ground, and continued to attack you, are you not allowed to defend yourself with deadly force because I don't have a knife or gun? If I had a gun or knige are you going to wait until I have my gun out ready to shoot or my knife within stabbing distance to try and draw on me when I already have the upper hand?
3 likes@Oritsu He wanted to. He just saw the gun and went 'nope'
0 likesJust imagine this crime long ago. No questions asked he’d be free because of race. But now cameras are everywhere and finally we are able to see the truth. From thugs to police officers.
3 likesI agree. But he does have the right to defend himself by someone he tackled him
1 like@Anthony Dunkley I agree with apart of what you said. But disagree with the part where u said "he had time to line up that shot when the guy backed off" he had time to NOT fire that shot when the guy backed off but because Drek's thought it was revenge he had time to fire his weapon.
2 likes@BlenderBanana Jordan P does. According to 2019 data between 60000 to 2.5 million acts of self defense MAY jave occurred during that year. He chose the highest number to help his case. Almost an impossible statistic to prove given how many aren't reported, false reports, but the report admits this data is unreliable.
0 likes@Brad Saunders Cannibals may have murdered and stewed between 0 and 1.9 Million American Orphans last year.
1 like/s
If you can't provide a method or a source, a guess that ranges almost 2 Million occurences is rediculous.
@BlenderBanana Pretty much.
1 likeAlso, no where in the article does it state that guns saved 2.5 million lives only that it was possible that up 2.5 million situations where a gun was used in self-defense. A good person with a gun MAY save lives but we have far too many that have no business being near a weapon.
0 likesYea but if you think about it, before he pulled a gun he wasn't the "garbage human being" he was just someone pissed off that someone that wasn't handicapped is parked in a handicapped spot, even though there was a bunch of other open spaces to park.
0 likesThat's what's really scary.
@Ezpzcz You could easily use the other side of the coin. It's better not to be obnoxious by being lazy parking in a handicapped spot cos you don't know who its going to piss off.
0 likesAt the end of the day the victim in this scenario is the man that died. Not the guy in jail. So if lessons should be taught its teaching how to stay alive not "how to stay out of jail"
That "father of 3" (as if that's some heroic & hard accomplishment)..... WON'T ever again be meeting a situation with unnecessary violence !
0 likes@Robu weird flex because this case absolutely didn’t go the way you’re saying it should’ve. Perhaps you’re not the best attorney. 🤡
6 likes@Becky Clawson Becky, I suggest actually reading and putting your thinking cap on because the conversation we were having was a little more nuanced than that. I never said the outcome of this case was wrong.
4 likes@Christiaan Ingram that and the guy wasn’t even really fighting with him when he got shot. He backed away, literally walked backwards as soon as the guy fell to the ground. Had he not shot, it most likely would’ve been done and over with.
2 likes@jordan p I will gladly take over from @little loner and provide some statistics. "Gun violence was the leading cause of death for all children and teens ages 1-19 in 2018, surpassing motor vehicle accidents for the first time in history. Children and teens are far more likely to die from gunfire than COVID-19. In 2019, nine children and teens were killed with guns each day in America—one every 2 hours and 36 minutes." (Wisqars data from the CDC)
5 likesTo me, this seems enough information to change some beliefs regarding gun- safety.
Also, I am not impressed by 'what ifs... scenarios', like the FBI one: "Our FBI has stated that somewhere between 200,000 to 2 million lives are saved each year by legally owned firearms used for self-defense." You just cannot know what would have happened if there was no firearm in the situation. That's why it is such a ridiculously broad range, they simply don't have a clue.
@carmenl163 You do realize that those teens killed by gun violence are overwhelming teens in gangs the gun eachother down every single day. Gangs never aquire guns legally and a lot of the guns they use are already banned outright in the entire country. Try again because passing more laws will never remove that gun from situation considering the ridiculously large black market for firearms that already exists and regulating firearms more would increase the black market.
1 like@carmenl163 Also even if it is a "ridiculously broad range" the bare minimum is still 200,000 every year which vastly outweighs the amount of deaths by firearms each year which over 60% is suicide and the deaths that aren't justifiable self defense cases are majority gang on gang violence. All you have to do is look at the statistics of one city, Chicago, to see how much gang violence adds to tally. You claim to provide statistics to backup your point but only provided one with absolutely zero context.
1 like@bewing77
0 likesThat’s where the term Dangerous Freedom comes into play.
Everyone should be responsible with their actions equally , regardless of being armed and or able to defend oneself by hand.
Peace and Grace.
@Junior
0 likesYou saved many from having to say that.
@Anthony Dunkley he didn't consent to it...he started it
1 like@Christiaan Ingram well said
2 likes@Anthony Dunkley If someone pushes you, that's not a fight. You enter the fight when you physically retaliate. You can always just walk away. Getting pushed does not "get you into a fight you didn't conscent to". If you get pummeled with no chance of escape, that is when you're in a fight you didn't consent to.
2 likes🙌🙌
0 likesYou are INCREDIBLY dismissive of MANY of the facts in every statement u make.. Would the matter be different if it was a 80 year old women that he pushed over??? or.. what if HE had died from the push?? Thousands die from what look like innocuous falls and scrapes on the daily!!! you down playing the violence that was propagated against this man is just as egregious as any statement made in FAVOR of the murderer..
0 likesBecause he's a grey everyday unremarkable individual that behaved like the whole world owed him ? He placed more importance on himself than he was worth, thought he was special and above the law. A nuisance, and a quick-to violence one at that.
1 like@ClydeJarrod37UK I agree he was a bit odd.. and yes.. he did seem to think he belonged in a cop uniform.. but i certainly think HE thought that he was innocent and had done nothing wrong.. my worst impression tho.. was when he was told the guy died.. if that was me.. i would have gone to absolute pieces.. he barely showed any emotion.. this is what convicted him for me!
1 like@Robu the legal system, you know, the professionals in the judicial system disagreed with you. It is the same on McMichaels and Bryan case.
1 like@M. Diane Julie Benton You clearly don't understand what you are talking about. This is a vastly different case than the Ahmaud Arbery case was. You should be embarrassed for even making that comparassion . Also, call up any one of the lawyers in this trial. Provocation, as Chris and the dumb lady insinuated, is not what got Micahel Drejka convicted.
2 likes@Robu what got him convicted was that he murdered a man when he had other choices. You calling me names shows your lack of intelligence. In bother cases, the perpetrators thought that self-defense was their claim to being found not guilty. It was not.
4 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton I didn't call you a name. I said you should Be embarassed, which you should. There is no one size fits all of self defense. If you're going to just throw in recent high profile self defense cases you may as well throw in Rittenhouse and Thedore Edgecome, because they are all the same to you. No nuance to any of it right? All self defense claims are the same according to you.
2 likesAlso, you're wrong again. What got him convicted wasn't "murdering a man when he had other choices. He very well could have had a lawyer put together a decent self defense case, but his insistence to the police he wasn't in fear of hisife is what screwed him over.
Great observations! I tell my concealed carry students they should never do anything WITH a gun that they wouldn't do WITHOUT one.
0 likes@Robu he had choices. He made an illegal choice. The same is true with the McMichaels and Bryan. Naming two cases does not mean I think all self defense cases are the same. Had Drejka chosen to have legal representation, lawyers may have been able to help him. But, there were witnesses, the video, and his actions in approaching others in a threatening manner. Like Travis, he probably would have not done well on a cross examination. Drejka is a danger to society and he is where he belongs. I have not followed nor plan to follow the Rittenhouse or Edgecomb cases, so I will not and have not commented on either.
5 likesThe two cases I have followed involved people who made the choice to initiate contact, provoke, and confront people who had been minding their own business. I’m both cases, if they were so concerned about an alleged violation of the law, they could have called the police. Instead they chose to take the law in their own hands. According to the outcomes in both cases, the judicial system found their actions and choices did not met the criteria of self defense. They provoked unarmed people and then wanted to say they feared for their lives. In both cases neither victim verbally threatened these criminals with words or a gun. Fear for your life has to meet certain legal standards. Drejka’s victim did push him and if he had been arrested, he may have been found guilty. However, a lawyer might argue that he was defending his family. But that should have been decided in court.
BTW, I am not embarrassed nor is the woman you referred to dumb. If you think you know more than the the legal entities in the Drejka case, you should offer your insights.
I was assaulted by an armed person who was unprovoked. I understand fear for my life and had to make choices.
@Robu your interpretation. We will never know if the victim was legally provoked because Drejka murdered him. Socially, most people will respond to protect their families from a verbal assault by a stranger. Drejka probably thought he was getting an aggressive freebie because the woman was alone with her small children. In the end, he is a coward. If he knew a McClockton existed in relation to this family, he would not have been so cavalier. As he said, he has never been in a fight, but he hides behind a gun. He is a convicted murderer no matter your legal interpretation.
5 likesHe legal claim if fear for his life did withstand the legal criteria of a reasonable person. The prosecutor spelled it out in the closing. In the end Drejka is a danger to society and is where he belongs as a convicted murderer who is also a coward.
You can tell me that I don’t understand a 100 times. It does not change the legal facts. It seems you want to make him some sort of hero and victim when he is just a criminal.
Didn’t the guy initiate physical aggression first though?
0 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton I'm not trying to make Drejka out to be a "hero." Stop with that. Evey adult in this situation was an idiot and should have done things differently. That being said, you cannot provoke an attack from a person you don't know exists. You don't understand how this works legally. Explain to me, how one legally provokes an attack from somebody they don't see. Don't start with any of this "his family" bs that you were just going with. if you're going to sit here and grand stand by telling me I don't understand my profession. Explain legal provocation and it works in a self defense case in Florida.
2 likesYou say things like, "He legal claim if fear for his life did withstand the legal criteria of a reasonable person" It didn't matter how a reasonable person would receive the incident because he admitted to the police he wasn't in fear. You don't understand the words you are saying.
@Robu you can have his admission as well as the reasonable person standard. If they followed your rationale, the prosecution could have simply read his statement to the police and called it a day. Yet, they had a full trial with evidence, witnesses, and a defense. I paraphrased the Florida prosecution’s closing statement about the reasonable person standard in response the the defense attorney’s argument to justify self defense. I am pretty sure he is quite familiar with the laws in his own state. The judge nor the defense stopped the prosecutor to correct him because he was right according to the laws of the state for which he worked.
2 likesI understand quite well as did the jury.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Yes, obviously they had a trial that's how things work. I don't think the levels are here for us. You're clearly off in la la land if you think what I was saying was that's all they had to do show a line from his interrogation and there would be no trial. Now, no more skirting around the question. If we are going to continue, I need you to explain how I am wrong about provocation and how provocation works in a self defense case in Florida because you keep making these points to try and argue with reality but you refuse to expand on anything past a service level.
1 like@Robu you seemed to miss the point. Your logic that he was he was found guilty because of his “confession” and that nothing else matters… your logic which might lead someone to think that you do not believe in a trial and how things are done.
3 likesI will humor your provocation criteria. if someone, a stranger, breaks into my house, i am provoked to act and defend myself. If someone assaults or verbally threatens or seems threatening to my neighbor, even if they do not know I exist, I am provoked ir give cause to act. If a stranger attempts to kidnap my child, I am provoked… that is, given cause to act even if they do not know me or that I exist. It doesn’t matter whether they know I exist, I can have justifiable cause to act. The crux of your argument seems to be that Drejka did not know the victim existed. It doesn’t matter whether he knew that McClockton existed. If you are walking down the street and you see a child, woman or older person being attacked verbally or physically, you might consider cause for action. Some people would and have. What might be seen as an impending threat can be a cause for action. You are suggesting that you would not…you consider it “bs”…eh, that is your view. However,a reasonable person might feel provoked to intervene.
I do not care if you continue or not. You do not see your understand certain types of rhetoric. You do seem to think that you know more about Florida law than the prosecution, the defense, and the police. Interesting. In the end, a dangerous criminal (and a coward) is where he belongs.
@M. Diane Julie Benton No, you think you know Florida law better than they do because you are spouting nonsense. That's not how provocation works in a legal sense. And even if the push was provoked, which it wasn't, you are still allowed to defend yourself if the threat level rises to you reasonably fearing for your life. A conversation, even a heated one, does not rise to the level of provoking an attack from a third party. If, by your example, you see somebody yell at an old woman im the street and push the person yelling to the ground, you're more than likely getting charged with an assault. I'll reiterate again because you're getting it. You do not understand the words you are saying.
1 likeAgree for the most part. But i do have to say that him saying "neutralizing the threat" isnt a thing of him separating himself from the gravity of the situation. If youre getting robbed, and lets say you wrestle the gun out of the perpetrators hands and shoot him. You might feel completely justified. But someone could come up and say "Wow you just murdered a guy who has a wife and kids instead of giving him your wallet". You can always make whatever shooting, justified or unjustified, seem batshit insane.
0 likesClearly if he thought the law was on his side, he would take the "neutralizing a threat" instead of the "murdering a guy in front of his wife and kids" route. I dont think its nefarious.
@Robu LOL.. McClockton was not on trial. I said earlier that he might have been arrested if he had not been murdered.
3 likesBut his action were not enough for self defense on the part of Drejka. The evidence, video and witnesses, showed McClockton backing away. Retreating and not verbally threatening harm to Drejka.
Nor did Drejka try to ascertain if he was a threat.
According to the Florida police, prosecutors, judge, and jury, Drejka’s self defense claim did not meet the criteria of the Florida laws on self defense. What part of the Florida legal action don’t you understand. It was under the Florida system that he was this discussion convicted. It seems that you are not understanding the words. I have not changed my stance throughout discussion. I have repeated statements and because you are having difficulty, I have been more explicit.
BTW, you know that Drejka wa doing more than just a yell at the woman and children. He was circling the car and behaving in what one might deemed as a threatening manner to total strangers. He felt entitled to do so and emboldened because he was armed with a gun. Here was this seemingly defenseless woman with her small children. I know that you think that is bs…maybe you do not have children. I might have stepped at 5’2” and at 72 years to confront him on behalf of this family. More than likely, I would have stepped in to tell him to leave them alone. But, in the end, Drejka was proven to be a murderer and threat to society. He is where he belongs.
I know, according to you, I do not understand my words. You are hilarious and feel so entitled that you are right that you ignore the Florida judgment.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Well yeah, it's hard to put somebody on trial when they are dead. You say you haven't change your position but your position is nothing. My original comment on here was correcting Chris' misunderstanding of provocation and you less eloquently continued the trend of not understanding how it works. I'm a lawyer this is my field of expertise. I'm telling you you don't understand what you're talking about. You're taking bits and pieces you midly comprehend and are spewing them out. Which somehow you are conflating that with making a cogent point.
3 likes@Robu I doubt you are a lawyer. You cannot seem to understand the Florida law as presented in this case. You certainly don’t understand what the Florida prosecutor argued on the reasonable person standards l, his words, not mine. You fail to address his argument during the closing of the case. Attacking my character and my linguistic and cognitive abilities seems to be your best tactic which is truly sad for you. I have worked with many lawyers as have friends who are lawyers. I do not believe you are a practicing attorney.
3 likes@jordan p BBB
0 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton Explain provocation then and how it works in a self defense case. You can sit here and say the prosecutor said all you want you don't understand what you are saying. Stop beating around the bush and explain. Shut me up by proving me wrong.
3 likes@Robu you will keep just keep ranting like a William Faulkner character. you, like some failed rhetoricians or alleged rhetoricians, keep changing your claim and supporting evidence. You can keep ranting. I have explained it more than once. I have pointed to experts from Florida since you claim is based on Florida law.
3 likesI do find your rants amusing. In many ways you are like your friend Drejka. He is a bully trying to make others bend to his will because he believed he was the only one who was right. Your claim about provocation is not logical. You can rant all you want.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Diane, Julia, whatever your name is. You're choosing to be ignorant at this point. You don't understand provocation from a legal stance. Please contact one of those many lawyers you know and get back to me. The fact you keep insinuating that I am for what Drejka did just shows how the nuance of the conversation was lost on you.
2 likes@Robu dear, dear…you have yet to explain provocation from a legal standpoint. I do not have to call upon my lawyer friends. I will take the words of the Florida lawyers. It is interesting that you refuse. I will keep saying that in the end, it doesn’t matter. The Florida legal system has spoken and Drejka is where he belongs. Your ranting will not change that. Rant on Robu…rant on
2 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton I very much explained to you that you can't reasonably provoke a third party you don't know exists, especially not one that has no idea what is going on. You then went on a rant about women, children, and the elderly despite none of them getting special provocation privileges.
2 likes@Robu your explanation is wrong; it is not logical; it is simplistic and can certainly be argued in court. It certainly can be argued in court . McClockton was provoked when he say his family under what he probably believed was a verbal attack on his family. He is not a third party to use your premise. Was he justified based on this provocation would have been decided in court if he had not been murdered.
3 likesI know you will continue because you want to be right but you are not. You ignore what the Florida court decided or inferred even though you initially used Florida law as your evidence for your position. But rant on…
@Robu "had he" but he dindt
1 like@Anthony Dunkley yeah "defending" yourself when he took steps back already
3 likes@omarajax2 Yes, which part of that is confusing to you? We were talking about a hypothetical that changes the dynamics of the situation.
1 like@Robu Gee, Robu, you are misrepresenting what McClockton did and what I said about the high possibility that he would have been arrested. Something I said more than once. So, when you are wasting your time and the time of your colleagues with lies about what position I took, and what McClockton actually did, make sure you show them unedited copies of our dialogue. Not only will they see what I said and your misrepresentation but your attack on my character and unnecessary cursing. You are doing a good job of representing yourself and your colleagues. I doubt you have what it takes to be that honest with them or yourself.
2 likesI would actually love to be there when you have this conversation with them. Watching their embarrassment would be amusing.
@M. Diane Julie Benton Should I include all of the times you called Markeis McGlockton "McClockton" or would you rather I clean it up a bit to make it look like you aren't completely clueless?
0 likes@Robu if you are so petty to be distracted by a typo…go for it. I will find it even more amusing. It does not change your misrepresentation one iota, a far mor egregious act than a typo.
2 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton Well no, typo would be how you just spelled more without the e. You called him the wrong name over and over again that's not a typo. If we're being honest though, the rampant misuse of ellipsis bothers me much more than you not knowing his name or your misunderstanding of provocation.
0 likes@Robu please share your concerns about my typo or misspelling and my habit of using the ellipsis. Again, I will be amused while your colleagues read your comments to me…the unwarranted attacks and cursing (oops, another pesky ellipsis). Your misrepresentation of McClockton’s actions as well as my position should interest them. Again, I doubt you will follow through.
2 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton They were very impressed with your legal takes. If you ever find yourself in the PNW you've got yourself a job.
2 likesI think it is fair to say that the shooter's actions leading up to the shooting are indefensible. Common sense dictates that angrily yelling at strangers in public is a bad idea.
1 like@Robu did you share your comments as well? Did they give you a pat on the back with a good job Robu? Misrepresenting yourself again? You have a bad habit of not being truthful. Why would anyone want to work next to such a rude liar?
2 likesProbably the same reason many of Us Are angrier... This was an Unnecessary murder !!! NOT a good enough reason, no motive, just stupidity,maybe even racism on His part... I think pointing the gun was sufficient enough that stopped the fight... This is even scarier of a situation because it was just a random murder...
2 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton Well DJB. That's simple. As attourneys, they enjoy working next to somebody who knows how the law works.
0 likes@Robu Again, why anyone would want with a firm that hired you? I never claimed to be a lawyer. I just pointed out some facts and observations that are part of the public record. That seemed to trigger a hissy-fit on your part devolving into misrepresentations and attacks. If your colleagues are gullible enough to believe you, I have to wonder about your firm. Keep prattling about whatever you are allegedly doing.
2 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton Gullible enough to believe what DJB? I earned my PD. From where I'm sitting, you're the one who threw a "hissy fit" when they failed to understand the nuance of the conversation and prattled on about things they don't fully comprehend.
2 likes@Robu gullible enough to believe your misrepresentation of McClockton’s actions and my actual words. I do not know whether you earned a PD or why it matters. You are not truthful and you engage in character attacks to make your points. Your hissy-fits about typos or misspelled words and the ellipsis and the Florida prosecutor’s discussion of provocation in this case. No one had said McClockton should have pushed Drejka but he did not do it on a whim. But that is neither here or there. McClockton was not on trial. We do know that if you were in the store and your wife and children were in the car and someone came in said a man was yelling at a woman and her children, you would do nothing because what is the big deal. You would not be provoked; you would be okay. That is your right. Others would be. The legal system in Florida recognized that others might be. No one said it was legal, just that it was understandable. It was not that McClockton was found innocent but the Drejka started this series of events and is responsible for the outcome, McClockton. You don’t need to be a lawyer to understand. You believe you are the only capable of understanding. You are not. You even refer to “they”
2 likesI expect you will continue.
@M. Diane Julie Benton DJB, I believe there are many people capable of understanding a simple concept. I believe you are too you are just choosing not to. You still don't even care enough to say the man's name right. Stop being disprectful to the dead.
2 likesAlso, my wife would never get into a shouting match over a parking spot. Nor would I let her sit in a parking lot by herself, so I will never be in this situation. If I was, I wouldn't run out of the store and attack a guy.
Exactly if ur gonna be the type a person to get crazy over a handicap spot then u know this guy causes a fuss over small stupid shit and if he gets pushed it’s license to kill wtf hell no
2 likes@jordan p youre really trying to argue that fists and blunt objects kill more people than guns in the usa
1 like@Robu It certainly was not my intent to be disrespectful to Mr. McGlockton, my error. At the same time, I am not choosing to ignore any simple concept because it is not simple but complex under varying circumstances which the legal system considered if you listen to the questions the police asked the defendant nuanced as they were, and the points the prosecutor raised in questioning and in his closing.
2 likesI am also sure you care about your wife and, if for some reason, she chose to wait in the car and someone came into your location to say a man was yelling at a woman, you would go check. I too would not engage in a shouting match with anyone. That is maturity. Everyone responds differently to verbal attacks and what they may view as threatening behavior.
In the end, Drejka is where he belongs. There is no need to belittle me and my intelligence or attack my character because we disagree and have different perspectives. There is no need to misrepresent what I have claimed or not claimed. Nor, is there any need to misrepresent Mr. McGlockton’s actions. That is even more disrespectful than spelling his name with a C rather than a G.
Don't put your hands on people if you value your life.
0 likes@M. Diane Julie Benton DJB, I'll start this message off nicely for you and we can find some common ground. I agree that Drejka deserves to in prison. You not agreeing with me on how provocation is applied as a legal concept dose not mean I think l he is a good guy or wasn't in the wrong. It isn't also isn't disrespectful to review the actions of Markeis McGlockton, because had he approach things differently he would be alive today. You have people in this comment section saying that his pushing Drejka is what a "real man" would do. Thats a dangerous social contruct that leads to incidents like this. Had Markeis' girlfriend ignored Drejka, drove away, said, " I'm sorry, I didn't see the sign" the shooting, most likely, dosnt happen. Her essentially threatening Drejka with "wait till my man gets here." Didn't help the situation.
2 likesI truly believe he had the gun with intent to start a confrontation in hopes of it getting physical and killing someone with cries of self defense.
2 likesB
0 likesVery well said!!
1 like@bewing77 The genie is now waaay out of that bottle in America though.
0 likesExceptionally said, OP!
2 likesI will just say, as a guy who carries legally daily, I actually am even more studious about avoiding confrontations because of that.
Deadly force is only legal (and moral) when either an innocent bystander or I am in danger of death or serious bodily injury, and the problem with confrontations is that they can all too easily escalate into something far worse than a shove to the pavement.
None of this would have happened if this guy hadn't decided to play junior parking enforcer, but once he made that mistake and angered the husband of the woman he was berating into shoving him to the pavement, he should have just cut his losses and apologized for his own boorish behavior and let things deescalate.
@Anthony Dunkley I do agree, you shouldn’t just take it when someone is attacking you. It didn’t seem that he would have been in the position of accepting being in a fight he didn’t consent to. This guy was looking for a fight.
1 likeScrap on the arm, that push would have easily killed a human. Regardless of what is what - They both got what they were looking for!
0 likesHandguns are supposed to be the ultimate equalizer when it comes to combat situations but they really aren’t. They just push people to get into confrontations they otherwise would not have gotten into if they are unarmed. People will start arguments because they know they are armed; they are automatically willing to use it as well because they are armed. There has to be some kind of rules and regulations regarding guns and deadly force. It’s a good thing we had video evidence in this case but the fact that he felt entitled to use deadly force to equal being pushed speaks to how bad the situation really is.
1 likeYou cannot use deadly force because you were pushed. You can’t use deadly force because someone threatened you. You can’t use deadly force just because you saw someone with a firearm. Even the states that don’t have a “duty to retreat” place restrictions on when you can use deadly force or not. You can only use proportional force; force equal to that of the initial aggressor. You can’t go around executing people because they punched you in most situations either. I guess some of the people in this very thread don’t know these things.
1 like@Pugachev's Kobra It really is amazing how you have all this insight about handgun carriers, totally confident in your false convictions.
0 likesabsolutely. you summed up all my statements for me here. thank you. good day!
0 likeslol I'm entitled to my life I would like to think
0 likesBackseat he got off with less than 5 years for a remorseless killing that easily could've been avoided. You got pushed and escalated a shove to actual murder
0 likes@Christiaan Ingram want to watch your back all you want, any good lawyer will use that quote to pin any "self defense" as a predetermined murder, like this guy deserves. Yes he got pushed, that doesn't equal deadly weapon. Self defense in this case is a joke this guy is a heartless killer
1 like@Robu he shouldn't have been convicted of manslaughter, he's a remorseless murderer
2 likes@Robu if you're a lawyer I am seriously worried about the remainder of your victims, I mean clients
2 likes@Robu no, you disgust me with how vehemently you support actual murderers, there was no equal force.
1 likeDefend all you want the guy chose to kill a man
@Robu it's all good smoothbrain agree to disagree I don't care he got 20 years. Should've been longer but hey at least it's something
2 likes@Bojang Bugami That's not how the law works omegabrain. A shove can aboslutley be a deadly force attack.
0 likes@Bojang Bugami You clearly have no idea how the law works. The self defense claim was there for Drejkas lawyers to make. Courts aren't about feelings they are about facts. Once you get out off middle you can back and try again.
0 likesnice but i ain’t reading all dat
1 like@Robu Haha! YOU'RE an attorney! What area of law do you specialize in? It must have been trolling because you seem particularly gifted in that regard.
2 likes😄
@Augusta Septemberova you made an excellent point that a lot of people just overlook...pushing someone down isn't "fighting".
2 likesThink of it this way, if the victim had punched Drejka instead of pushing him that's an entirely different scenario.
Pushing someone is battery.
Punching someone is ASSAULT and battery.
I don't think that justifies a lethal response, but at least he'd have more of a case.
@M. Diane Julie Benton That was such a well written, well REASONED response. You're an excellent writer...
2 likes@Christiaan Ingram Why you looking to retain me? I started out as a criminal defense attourney and after years of that I left the firm I was at and stated primarily focusing on estate planning. Infinitely easy and pays better.
2 likes@Robu obviously it matterrd he’s in prison . you clearly don’t have a permit probably an open carry fool . gun class 101 you can not provoke an altercation and then claim self defense!
0 likesyou started a fight with a gun ..
@Robu bizarre
0 likes@Robu this isn't a courtroom
0 likesThe factors youre erasing carry obvious significance in the moral world.
This is real life.
The significance of these factors is instantly comprehensible to reasonable people.
@Robu Legalism petsonified.
1 like@Robu he had ' no reason' to believe his sweetheart and tiny children were in danger or under threat ?
0 likes@jordan p THAT'S ALOT.^
1 likeTHE ONLY THING THE KILLER SAW WAS THAT IT WAS A BLACK MAN
@Anthony Dunkley if you push someone down who picked a fight " its only fair" to be SHOT ???
0 likes@Robu Retain your services? Haha!
3 likesYou’re not even winning arguments in this thread! The prisons in your state must be packed with your former clients. 😂
@D D L What in the world are you on about? "This isn't a court room" We're talking about committing and being convicted of a crime. Do you understand how the legal system works? There's a court involved in that buddy. With lawyers who make arguments for and against you.
2 likesAlso, yes, when you walk out of a store and all you see is a man next to your car, a reasonable person dosnt assume that man needs to be assaulted.
I feel like he wouldnt have pulled the gun if the guy didnt get aggressively physical. In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it. If he got physical then the guy would wanna get back at him harder, which is shooting the gun. Theres no equal revenge at that point.
0 likes@Robu well you know that is not all that was going on. 'A man standing next to a car' lol
0 likesC'MON 😂! C'MON, GUY !
AND I AGREE with you !
IT WAS ABSOLUTELY
UNREASONABLE to barrel over and push the rude guy down
The man who was out of the blue out there hollering at your sweetheart and the 2 toddlers
Making a terrible commotion !
It was hotheaded and atrocious to race over and shove him !
It was rash !
A customer had just rushed in to raise the alarm that a woman was out there in an altercation he was concerned for her safety he and the 5 year old could hear the hollering some guy going to TOWN on a Mom and 2 tiny toddlers when you'd left them moments ago sitting peacefully in your car minding their own business safe snd sound while you and 5 year old big brother dash in to grab some snacks for the family on a beautiful day like a million times before a family outing a beautiful day and - what?
A msn is going crazy out there
He raced over and pushed the guy!
Bad move!
Because the guy WAS a volatile grenade with a long string of road rage and other offenses with a yen for going after people in cars and threatenig them with guns going after WOMEN in cars
Certainly if he had groveled and apoeased and deescalated and validated the outragious strange man's ego apologized and smoothed the waters and made peace at all costs he might have escaped with his life !
If he hadn't been the one this gu6 went after who taken the bait and used his hands instead of an apoeasing he might not have been executed without mercy in front of his sweetheart and 3 precious kids for doing something we learn is a nono in preschool..
The killer shared that he then whipped around to see if the woman needed to be shot too and then decided nobody else needed to be shot and coolly set his gun aside and waited for the law to arrive confident he had done everything just right while she wailed in her grief and the little children were yrapoed in the car and he was annoyed by all this inexplicable noisy yelling about "' the kids! The kids!"
NO HUMAN CONNECTION.
NONR. JUST SATISFACTION. .
HE PICKED YET ANOTHER OF MANY FIGHTS THAT HE USED HIS GUN TO DOMINATE AND HE WON THIS ONE WITH HIS GUN THE HARD WAY.
This is a human story, not solely a legal lesson.
This is a story with many lessons, moral, legal, survival...
If only both men had been more wirried about everyone's safety than Right and Wrong and not being or letting dear ones BE DISTESPECTED AND DEGRADES. if they had been more concerned with SAFETY than with RIGHTING WRONGS here maybe a relatable hotheaded dispute over principles wouldnt have ended in unspeakable tragedy.
If only either man - and the mama bear there - had been quick to self- humble in the face of the slap in the face of shocking unpleasant provocation if only all 3 or even Any of the 3 had reacted to being challenged by rising above that feeling of having their buttons pushed by a Bully by apoeasing the bully Apologizing. Retreating. Making Peace at all costs if only their kneejerk reaction to what was percieved as disrespect was to be instantly humble, salf-effacing respectful and conciliatory
If they had put their Pride aside the victim might be alive today and well the killer would probably still be out there going after people since he was a volatile repeat offender - a powderkeg ac- horror or incarceration just waiting to happen, but maybe he'd still be at least outside and free to treasure his blessed life with his own dear ones and his two beautiful dogs.
@D D L No, that's not all that was going on, but Markeis McGlockton wasn't privy to any thing that was going on. You cant say Drejka provoked Markeis when Drejka didn't know he existed and Markeis didn't know anything about what was going on. For all he knew, Drejka was a third party checking on his wife after the argument. Markeis heard there was an argument outside, walked out there, and then attacked a man who was next to his car. He had no reason to believe that Drejka was a danger to him or his family. It wasn't until Drejka pulled out his gun that Markeis back away from him. Until he started going for the gun, Markies was standing over Drejka. He is 100% justified in pulling iut the gun.
0 likesThe argument was there to make that Drejka reasonably believed the attack wasn't over. Whether the jury would buy it or not is another story.
@Robu ah... i see what you mean.. about the chance of some mistaken-identity fluke..
0 likesHe Wasn't wrong, but its a point.
I agree that the men. And MamaBear too were all rising to passionately champion PRINCIPLES and put their sense of commitment to Righting Wrong above that of seeking to protect physical safetyat all costs.
And it couldbbe argued that all 3 felt it was incumbent upon them to step up to Bulkying and STOP thr bullying in its tracks.
I agree with that arguably the father the killer killed was CHAMPIONING his sweetheart and toddlers agaist bullying or degradation more than protecting them from a volatile deadly threat - and if hed known what a deadly threat it was he might have handled the confrontation much more cautiously the hothead had been repeatedly a hairsbreath away from a fatal shooting in numerous roadrage altercations he'd dominated with his gun they might have swallowed their Pride and apologized and attempted to placate and appease him at all costs, even groveled , and given him his satisfaction.
You are right -
While if the family perceived the killer as an unstable deadly threat they were certainly RIGHT -
they arguably didn't perceive the extreme danger they were in well enough until it was too late
As you said, the slain man rushed over to the man who had been hollering at his sweethesrt and 2 tiny children and pushed him down before backing off. Then he was shot to death by the angry man in front of the woman and small children he'd tried to stand up for.
Arguably, they didn't expect this.
Arguably. they presumed that confronting this bully would be a self-affirming lesson in the value of standing up for yourself and your loved ones and not a trap door to a horrible sudden death
Of Course we are taught we use our words and not our hands. - or our force multipliers - to resolve non~deadly disputes - by the time we are schoolchildren weve been
taught the wholesome lesson that solving a problem by rushing over and Pushing others is a NoNo.
Like you said -- Drawing the gun, arguably reasonable - it was the killer's judgement in pulling that trigger that was horribly flawed
[.i know i sound like a douche as i try to muddle through this -- 😆- I'm doing other things and keep getting pulled away and distracted so I'm just giving up and posting this trash just to get back to real life so sorry for all the flaws 🤓😆]
@D D L See, I like you. Obviously in a perfect world all three adults in this situation acted differently. I don't think Drejka is a good guy, but many people on here are conflating morality with the law. I didn't come her to champion Drejka. The entire point of my initial comments were about the misunderstanding of how provocation is applied.
2 likes@Oritsu A person in his position and seeing what he was seeing might not 'clearly know' an aggressor taking several steps back did not want or intend to to 'do those - or other - things' such as drawing his own weapon and shooting.
0 likesBut contraints to pulling the trigger dont require it to be CLEAR lthat the aggressor IS NO THREAT AT ALL.
UNLESS it is Clear the aggressor DOES present a deadly threat you don't pull that trigger. That's My Understanding. r
But this killer EXPLAINED HIS OWN THOUGHT PROCESS and justifications AT THE TIME and IN HIS OWN WORDS and as he stated them they fell short of rising to the level required for a finding of justifiable homicide.
But a man speaking to your girlfriend in the wrong tone justifies aggravated assault? Justice isn't blind, but people sure are. Both the victim and the shooter in this are idiots.
0 likesLive by idiotic uneeded violence and die by it too. I dont think the shooting was justified but when you start a conversation with violence you don't get to cry when the person you attacked has the capacity to be more violent.
The same way OP claimed that the shooter should have accepted that him using words somebody else might not like could escalate to him getting physically hurt as consequence for starting a verbal confrontation. The shooting victim has to accept the consequence that for starting a physical confrontation without ever saying a word.
@Annabella LeForce might have been looking for a fight but he didn't start it in this instance. Other guy cheap shotted him, and that's when the violence started so at that point self defense was justified except in this case it wasn't self defense.
0 likesSo a guy thinking he's a big shot doesn't justify someone putting their hands on him
@Anthony Dunkley I don’t think he was justified for pushing him. He took the fight onto another level but, there was a fight that was already started at that point.
0 likes@Michael Lamb right, cause if someone makes physical contact with you in the slightest, you have every right to murder them. Sounds to me like you're itching for a opportunity, and given that you admitted you beat people until they didn't get up, I'm getting the feeling you're the exact kind of person you want to protect yourself against. A person who believes that they have the right to kill another person, nah. Inalienable right to life, you don't get to just take a life and get away with that shit (Nor should you) regardless of circumstances.
0 likesBeating someone’s ass (victimizing them) for being antagonistic is also highly illegal. Why do people start physical violence over arguments or being insulted? This guy committed crime of assault then the subject of the video committed the crime of retaliating with deadly force when he wasn’t in fear of his life. He should have used the gun as a tool to get the other guy to back down. You can point the gun and give commands to back off etc and you have a very strong self defense case. The perp should have given the Man opportunity to back off and wait for police. You can’t shoot until the attacker continues to move towards you in a violent/threatening manner after you have produced the firearm. This creates legal fear for your life because if the attacker manages to disarm you they can then kill you with your own gun.
2 likesI’m trying to say that both of the men in this altercation committed crimes. Both played stupid games and won stupid prizes. If someone is having a verbal altercation it is always best to attempt at de escalation before resorting to physical means. If you go for violence just know there may be a violent retaliation. And if you are an armed citizen it is IMPERATIVE that you learn the laws and understood rules around firearm ownership. It is a HEAVY responsibility. Do not take it lightly. And do not shoot someone that is backing away from you for fucks sake.
In all seriousness although the dude was 100 guilty, that didn’t stop the POS who without physical provocation to push him all ghetto like. An eye for an eye.. and before anyone pathetic gets ancy… his culture reflected his actions… I mean intimidate someone obviously taking smack but you condemning solely the dude who brought a piece out is kind of ironic given the fact the same can be said for anyone retaliating back with force…you yourself don’t know who’s armed….
0 likes@Michael Lamb So killing someone is okay?
0 likesThis is everything that Active Self Protection TEACHES gun owners to be considerate of. Thank you
0 likesHe is a dangerous man
0 likes@Looking 4 Things if that is what you think is appropriate in a man then I hope your partner doesn’t end up like the victim here. He pushed an older, smaller man in the back with as much force as he could muster onto concrete. He didn’t deserve to be murdered but it was a cowardly and stupid thing to do imo. You can de-escalate or stand up for yourself or your family but it’s just common sense to leave room for the other person to retreat while retaining some pride.
1 like@David Ng Your protective instincts are lacking. If you're truly an honest person show this to your partner and ask if he or she feels safe with you. I happen to have 5 brothers and one sister and we were raised a very different way when it's a man against a woman.
0 likesLol you’re rambling; it’s absolutely Hilarious thst you blame the victim instead of blaming the aggressor; you then go on to to play the what if game; what if he shot an innocent bystander; if you knew what you were talking about you would see that no one is behind the aggressor when the shot was fired; the children were also in the car 🤦♂️ I’m assuming the aggressor hefted the other child in the store; because the Narrator says the aggressor took a child in the store; you’re also slandering the victim he didn’t murder anyone it’s as clear as day the shooter was attacked un provoked
0 likes@Christiaan Ingram lol the victim was the shooter smh 🤦♂️ the victim was “minding his own business “ smh it’s sad when the victim was physically attacked clear as day unprovoked . &. Not one of you blame the aggressor
0 likes@Christiaan Ingram lol guess you forgot that George Zimmerman was a minority a Hispanic; or that doesn’t fit you victim Mentality 🤦♂️
0 likes@Little Loner I'm sorry America makes you feel so insecure.
0 likes@Robu Lawyer here. You’re completely wrong. It matters.
0 likes@HypnoToad Also, a lawyer here. You're going to have to be a bit more specific I have about 30 messages in this thread. What matters?
0 likes@William Blackfyre I mean id litterally be losing some of my rights due to being disabled so uh
0 likesYeah doesn't instill much confidence
@Looking 4 Things you have no proof of that.
0 likes@Drdrjr hmm maybe we think its a good idea because two years ago I was able to prevent myself from being carjacked. Guy pulled a knife and told me to open the door. I pulled my pistol from the holster in my door and he turned and ran. I didn't have to shoot anybody. But I was able to protect myself and my children. Why do you want to take that ability away from me? Why do you think people should be at the mercy of criminals? Are you a criminal and just don't want to have to deal with innocent people defending themselves?
0 likes@Becky Clawson nice racism
0 likes@umungus I think that the opportunity to defend yourself like that is a great thing. However I also believe guns cause way more harm than mercy. I could compare it to nuclear weapons. If one country produces nuclear weapons, other countries have to do it too, in order to put things in a stalemate. However it is far from likely that a stalemate like that will last forever. It would be much safer if no country had nuclear weapons in the same way that it would be safer to prevent people from getting their hands on guns.
0 likes@Drdrjr i would totally agree with you, unfortunately statistics here in the US completely prove you wrong. The amount of crimes stopped by legal gun owners far outweighs the crimes committed with guns. Gun safety should be taught in schools, the gun laws for each state should be drilled into kids heads. The problem is nobody wants to have an actual discussion about the issue here in the US. There are two sides, either ban all guns or dont ban any. Neither side is willing to budge. You also have to consider how the US was formed, why it was formed, and what the second amendment was created for. Not only was it created so that each person has the right to defend themselves but also to prevent governments from abusing the people. Whats the first thing every dictator does when they come to power? They immediately disarm the population. Let me ask you this, do you agree with the Ukrainian government arming citizens to fight Russia?
0 likes@umungus Absolutely, but it is a complete different situation. The Russians are entering Ukrainian land and are killing civilians. It would be stupid not to arm the people. Guns in every day life however can turn a petty crime, a misunderstanding or an argument, into death. At the same time I agree with some of your points. It’s unfortunate that guns are the choice of solution in America. I live in Sweden where the system works much better in my opinion. There are better solutions than guns.
0 likes@Drdrjr no its not. See thats one of the reasons we have the second amendment. Its not different at all. Those Ukrainians would be much better off had they been allowed to own those weapons, learn how to properly use them, fire them at ranges. The fact that you think its a seperate issue shows how little you understand about the issue. When I say everyone should have the right to defend themselves I dont just mean in certain situations against certain people. I mean against any threat foreign or domestic. Imagine how much better those Ukrainians would be able to defend their homes if they had experience with those weapons. Imagine how much more quickly they would have been able to respond to the threat if they were allowed to own those weapons. Do you think putin would have thought twice about invading if he knew most Ukrainians had weapons to fight him and had experience using them? The answer is yes he would have. Good thing people like you made sure putin didn't have to worry about that. How is defending their lives, their loved ones and their homes any different to defending their lives, their loved ones and their homes? The only thing that differs in this scenario is its a foreign force invading and not a couple of criminals breaking into your house. Either you support the right to have a gun to defend yourself or you dont. Gun safety should be taught in schools. Why do you not advocate for the banning of cars? Cars kill more people than guns do. Often because someone is driving recklessly but I dont see you calling for cars to be banned. Why is that?
0 likes@umungus Clearly we have different opinions on the matter. To me there is a difference being able to defend yourself and owning a gun. The Ukrainian people are arming themselves because they are under attack. Arming yourself just in case you ever are under attack is a different thing. People like you might be able to realize when, and when not to use the gun. The problem is that some people are going to misbehave. An example of that is this case, where an innocent life was taken. In an ideal world having the possibility for people to fully defend themselves whilst also making sure that no unnecessary damage is done is possible. But not in reality. Making sure that guns don’t get in the wrong peoples hands is hard and is clearly not working.
0 likes@umungus wut
0 likesWhy are you lying about being a lawyer? It's sad. You have a disconnect with people. It must suck to be like that.
1 like@Bojang Bugami👈💪 Awesome! There is a gentleman right here.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things The irony of you saying I'm not a lawyer all because I'm talking about the legal defense of somebody you don't like isn't lost on me.
0 likes@umungus It was said by the GF's testimony during the trial.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things youre thinking of a different video on this channel but okay
0 likes@Looking 4 Things so because another guys girlfriend said her boyfriend was racist means this guy is also racist? Is that your "proof"?🤣
0 likesDont touchy me & you'll be fine...
0 likes@Looking 4 Things
0 likeslet it go hon...its been awhile
@Looking 4 Things It's crazy. It's almost like I can do my job and take 30 seconds to send a message every few days. I do love your continued attempts to make it seem like this is some monumental task that takes hours to come write up a reply.
0 likes@Robu Ok.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things Maybe you should spend less time arguing with people on here and find a good man to defend your honor.
0 likes@The Lone Wanderer 👋👋👋
1 likeWell said. I wish I could "like" your comment a million times.
1 like@M. Diane Julie Benton Imagine Robu in prison. OMG, They would kill him to beat the arrogance out of him.
0 likes@Christiaan Ingram Yes she is.
1 like@Christiaan Ingram Lol 🤸♀️
1 like@Christiaan Ingram Well said. I agree with you 100%
1 like@Looking 4 Things One, weird flex saying I wont make it in prison. I'm sure its a world you're very familiar with. I don't commit crimes though so we're good on that front.
0 likesTwo, "left the firm" is actually code for I stopped doing criminal work and started my own smaller practice where I do various things relating to contracts. Once again, weird that you want to project your sad life onto me and make assumptions about my personal relationships with my coworkers.
@Looking 4 Things hello there. 🙂 I've enjoyed a number of your comments in this thread btw. Which comment of mine did you agree with?
0 likes@Looking 4 Things Once again, I'm sure you are intimately familiar with what an empty bag of potato chips is like,
0 likes@Christiaan Ingram All of them. You get it and you speak from your heart
1 like@Looking 4 Things thank you 😊
1 like@Robu You should know your legal claims just don't ring true. Why do you care so much that strangers on youtube people you will never meet believe you? Something to think about.
0 likes@Bojang Bugami I like your style. 💪🤸♀️
1 liketo me is because the murderer is white and the victims were poc and he thought is actions would be justified for that reason alone.
1 likeThere's another one where the murderer, again a middle aged white man, indiscriminately shoots at 3 young black men because they were playing loud music again in a store parking lot. That one makes me so mad too!
@Little Loner "the ones that are emotionally and mentally stable"! 😂 then noone here not even cops should own guns!! People eat antidepressants for breakfast!
0 likes@Looking 4 Things Well they do because that's how the law works and I don't care if you believe it or not. Why do you care so much I'm correcting people on the law?
0 likes@Michael Lamb Your response is exactly why "Stand Your Ground" is a bad idea.
1 likeYou and I are the same when it comes to this: we're grown men not looking to pick fights with anyone.
We're also not going to let someone just come up and assault us.
We differ in the use of deadly force.
I was in a CVS a while back, when one of the customers started causing problems. He was disruptive to the point where the rest of us asked him to leave.
Well another customer took the initiative to start pushing him out the door and they start fighting.
I went to try and break it up. The disruptive guy was younger, bigger and stronger than me. He pushed me off of him so forcefully my glasses flew off my face and I was on my ass.
I was fine. I got up, found my glasses and helped break up the fight. I bought my stuff and went home.
No one died. I'm not in prison. Dozens of lives aren't destroyed forever.
I guess you would have just started shooting and let the chips fall where they may....
@Christiaan Ingram There's a lot more nuance to my thought process than you're gonna get in a YouTube comment section and I hope that would be the case for everyone.
1 likeIt's just simple to me in the aspect of keep your hands to yourself. Words are just that and while they might be offensive or even terrible they aren't justification to put hands on anyone. If things have gotten to the point of someone assaulting me there is a problem as I'm going to respond accordingly. I don't want to hurt anyone but if I have to I will so I don't get hurt and I can make it home to my family. I'm also not going to assault someone walking away.
I've seen and been thru some things that have made my attitude the way it is. I got into a fight in my mid 20s with someone who was high on something in my place of business. I went about things correctly until he swung on me at which point we fought and once he was on the ground I stopped and called the police. Literally as I was on the phone with the police the guy had found a pipe and hit me in the back of my head and after I dropped continued to hit me. I got hit in the head a couple more times but not as solid and he cracked two of my ribs. I have permanent hearing and vision loss (I already wore glasses so definitely didn't need that) to go along with the seizures that I still suffer from occasionally all thanks to that. This is why if I get into an altercation I won't stop until the other person is immobile. I have 3 kids and a wife that need me to make it home.
Also I own one gun and it's at my home 90% of the time. The only time it's on me is when I go out of town for business and I'm in unfamiliar areas. I don't feel the need to carry it around but at least here in Florida people expect you to be carrying so they at least think before they do stupid things. That's why I believe there should be stand your ground.
This case is not stand your ground. This guy is an asshole that was looking for problems. The guy who assaulted him was walking away. They guy had no right to do that but he shouldn't have died for it. Gone to jail a couple days yes but not die.
Breaking up a fight is a different thing altogether. If I'm doing that I know I'm doing it to try to create peace and I also expect to get pushed and possibly punched in that situation. That's a completely different scenario.
So with all that said yes I stand by what I said but there is much more nuance to it. I just want to live my life peacefully. There needs to be something in place to stop people like this guy that thinks you can just shoot over anything and also something to stop people like the guy that pushed him which was also not okay. Not on the same level of not okay obviously but still not okay. Everything about this situation was wrong especially with the guy who committed the murder.
@Michael Lamb I like what you said and appreciate the thoughtful response.
1 like@Christiaan Ingram Thank you. I read my first comment and realized that it came across aggressive and extreme. I don't want to promote violence. Have a great day and stay safe out there!
1 likeBased on the order of events he started the conversation with the woman, the victim had no reason to push him and if he had not fired a shot he would be able to sue the victim. The fight was started by the victim and he is not blameless in this. However his response to being shoved was way more than equal force.
0 likeshe doesn't have to be in fear for his life, at all, only if he believes he is at risk of serious bodily harm. He was at risk weather he understands it or not, and should have been found not guilty.
0 likesWhy do you say he was killed the guy attacking him?
1 likeHe was the aggressor, he killed the guy protecting his family. He killed the guy that defended himself.
All while the guy was walking away
@Anthony Dunkley Simple as this: You don't bring a gun to a fist fight... Even if the person initiated the first punch or shove in this case. It seems as though you're more focused on the fact that the other dude pushed the guy who was next to their girl's car instead of the fact that the actual instigator had walked up to the defendants car and proceeded to harass them over a parking spot he had no right to enforce. Either leave it to the police so they can handle the situation and/or get written up or charged for unlawful use of a firearm, or you ignore it and mind your own business like the one guy shown in the footage who darted to the right to avoid any such confrontation.
1 like@Robu how do you say that he had no knowledge of it when there were literally witnesses in the store that said they could hear shouting outside between a man and women. Then he walks out and see the man having some of conversation or alterncation with his girl, I'm pretty sure most people are smart enough to put two and two together
0 likes@Anthony Dunkley ah yes, because pushing someone to the ground because they seem to be threatening someone you love is the same thing as aiming a shot and shooting that person because you are mad that you got consequences for something you started
0 likes@jeremy pool How do you know the man isn't an innocent bystander who stopped to help? When McGlockton walked out of that gas station he didn't know what was going on. His presumption of what was going on wasn't reality and it certainly didn't justify him pushing Drejka to the ground.
0 likes@Robu it did, but ok. I'm pretty sure if you hear two people shouting and then the same two people when you walking at still having some sort of heated conversation, it's pretty easy to put two and two together. As a supposed lawyer, you would think that you would think of an actual rebuttal to that argument since it would actually be an argument used in court by either a witness or even the prosecutor
0 likes@jeremy pool This is where you're wrong. You wouldn't be allowed to say what the state of mind of McGlockton was in court. There is no way to prove what He saw or perceived. That's why you said. "Pretty sure. Nobody knows. The way you would argue it in court would be through the testimony of witnesses surrounding the intial confrontation and possibly even your expert testimony and let the jury assume.
0 likesBut please, go on and tell me more about how somebody would argue the state of mind of another in court.
@Robu it's really funny you say that when there are literally witnesses that could tell you his facial expressions and video evidence of his expression and how he was acting. So we don't actually have to guess what his state of mind was and we do in fact know what his state of mind was
0 likes@jeremy pool No, see once again you don't understand how this works. The things a witness would be testifying to are extraneous details that you are going to use to fit your narrative. You don't get to have the clerk come up and say, "Yes, McGlockton heard noise and was told something. So he went outside and thought there was a threat to his wife." That's not how it works.
0 likes@Briala B
0 likesI have to disagree.
If you start a VERBAL altercation / argument - you NEVER SHOULD have to expect "to get your ass kicked" - so PHYSICALLY attacked. THAT thinking shows how wrong your perception of human interaction is. NEVER should ONLY words be the reason for a physical attack.
In contrast to that - if you START a brawl, YOU should epxect that this can escalate up o the use of leathal force.
Thats why the black guy would have been charged if the gun would have not been pulled out. Assaulting someone is a crimal act. A verbal argument is not (expect insulting etc.)
The reason this guy went to jail is because the "attacker" is stepping back and there is a delay between pulling the gun and shooting.
I agree generally speaking, but I completely think your values are twisted if you believe it to be reasonable that, if you approach anyone and verbally have an exchange about something they're doing that's against the law, you should "accept the fact you might get your ass kicked". That is some BS right there, that goes against every facet of the concept of freedom. What the victim in this case did was completely and utterly despicable. It is absolutely NOT acceptable for someone to silently approach an unsuspecting person who's having a verbal, sufficiently distant exchange with anyone including the family, to come out of nowhere and blindside knock him to the curb, and you know he was still approaching him UNTIL he saw the gun coming out, just look at the footage. There's no telling what he was going to do if he didn't see the gun, but it is clear that he was displaying physical superiority over the killer and up to that point was using brute force to injure and dominate a weaker person 'to solve an argument' just like you posited the other person used his gun.
1 likeIs it more despicable to shoot the perpetrator after he backs off at the sight of the weapon and clearly retreats? YES. The killer was more despicable in his actions and the way he justifies them. That does not mean you should condone anything that the deadbeat sob did BEFORE he unfairly was robbed of his life. In fact what the poor dead guy did - I feel horrible for his kids - was highly criminal and should not have been expected, much less accepted by anyone who simply has a verbal argument with another person whether they were the one to confront the other first or not. It is very concerning when that has become the kind of values that America lives by, because it perpetuates the normalization of physical violence as a reasonable response; the very thing you're contradicting yourself with by condemning it later.
@Johnny Natrium don't start shit if you can't handle the consequences whether you are in the right or wrong
0 likes@jeremy pool This is only reasonable when the consequences are reasonable. And being assaulted for talking to someone, is not reasonable. That's normalizing violent behaviour.
0 likes@The Lone Wanderer The point you're arguing about provocation actually works much better when you use it for the case of the shooter. Being blindsided and thrown to the curb by a large stranger is much more provocative in terms making someone act rashly in 'self defense' than seeing someone argue from a safe distance verbally with no matter whom, and he took much more time quietly walking over to him before throwing him off his feet. So neither of us are really arguing that either defense should be accepted, but it strikes me that you use the 'provocation' argument only in favor of the aggressive dad and not the killer.
0 likes@Johnny Natrium I didn't mean to argue either way in terms of provocation, only on the basis that provocation, both physical and not, is a legal concept.
0 likesYou can really argue provocation either way, like what you said. But to say that Person A was provoked by Person B after Person B was provoked by Person A might not logically follow.
@Anthony Dunkley the other guy pushed him first, because he was getting aggressive with the man's girlfriend. The victim didn't just walk up and push him. He did what other men are supposed to do when a fellow man gets aggressive with the woman he loves. Point is, he had no business shouting at that woman over a parking violation. Period.
0 likes@Dinos you really are soft, if that looks like a vicious attack. Damn. What's wrong with people?
0 likesLesson: mind your own business, avoid petty confrontation
1090 likesAlso, don't talk to cops until you've spoken to a lawyer.
Replies (39)
makes me wonder the cops' intentions when they are interrogating this guy. I feel like they are pushing for the guy to incriminate himself rather than trying to find out what exactly happened after the guy had clearly shown that he was willing to cooperate. I think they should have shown him the video and have him explain what happened as events transpired.
11 likes@Sereti Lee I guess you don't know how interrogations work do you.
81 likes@Sereti Lee they already saw the video. They knew what happened.
27 likes@Justin Hill they saw the video but did not actually hear the audio.
3 likes@FallenAngel true, I don't know much about interrogation, but in my opinion, these cops were framing their questions to get a narrative that was convenient to them.
6 likes@Sereti Lee The whole point of not showing video evidence or any incriminating evidence against him is to catch him in a lie. Even though he was cooperating he was willing to change the narrative to try to make himself look less guilty. The video showed other wise and that helps the prosecution have an stronger case.
25 likes@Sereti Lee Race has nothing to do with it. This guy just has an inferiority complex and fell powerful while carrying a gun. Remember he has taken his gun out to intimidate five or four other people before he killed this man.
17 likes2 lessons here mate; avoid jail by avoiding confrontation over silly things.
16 likesAvoid getting shot by crazy mofos by not parking in disabled spaces.
@Sereti Lee
2 likesRegarding how interrogations work...
I think a key word here is "suspect". The police try to find "suspects", who the police "suspect" of doing something. I hope that may help in understanding how the police operates.
Anyway, I kind of think that the police should find the truth. But at the end of the day, they really just do try to get damning evidence or even confessions. "Finding" the "truth" is something the court of law has to figure out. The police is presenting interrogation footag, often. And it often is uses as evidence, successfully, as we see here.
Cheers
And don't park in handicapped spaces if you are healthy.
10 likes@Ras Mus So true. Guilty or not, never talk to the police without a lawyer present.
1 like@Ras Mus sometimes things are not as they seem to be, i came across some documentary where that best explains my point in this regard. a welfare check was requested on a couple. the cops knocked on the door and guy opened. he had a black eye which he couldn't explain how he got it. his girlfriend lay dead on the couch and he just assumed that he was sleeping. his he was interrogated for hours by cops who wanted to get nothing but a confession out of him. he kept saying that they were attacked but the cops weren't buying it. after several hours the cops realized that he was telling the truth and he had been shot 4 times in the head and somehow he managed to survive.
0 likes3 great points every parent should tell their kids
1 likeUnless you are a car Park enforcement civilian officer
0 likesyou forgot a couple: don't park in a handicapped spot, move your car if asked to, don't violently assault random people.
4 likes@Ras Mus and police never show evidence if they not have to. If he get the paperwork and see the cctv he can fit his statement to the evidence.
0 likes@Sereti Lee ehhh, 4 headshots and explained himself for hours... Sounds very improbably
3 likesHis lesson should of been don’t be tough with women he was tough until her husband came out and pushed him I hate how people are scary now a days
1 likeLesson of today: dont murder someone
0 likesfucking seriously, Capt. America here left a family without a father and he went to jail for saving the day, great job capt america!
0 likesnah murderers and rapists and pedophiles should def talk up a storm to the cops!!
0 likesno , why ? are u saying the lesson is that its fine that you kill someone just dont incriminate yourself?
0 likesNo the lesson is the aggressor got what he wannted
0 likesAnd don't park in the handicapped stall unless you are legally allowed to do so.
0 likesYep. I live in TX where it feels like everyone but me is armed to the teeth. Therefore, I avoid confrontation. It’s absolutely not worth losing your life over a parking spot, your place in line, or some other inconsequential thing.
0 likes@Sereti Lee good for you for watching a documentary about a few bad cops. Your parents must be so proud of you for watching that. Too bad that case has nothing to do with this case. It was an okay try though.
4 likes@Devada he didn't say that🤣 youre gonna have to try harder than that to put words in someone's mouth. "Avoid petty arguments" he wouldn't have shot anyone had he not started a petty argument.
0 likesDon’t talk to the cops, period.
0 likesnot even if you have spoken to a lawyer. Never speak to any police officer or investigator not one word. This man is only in jail because he is inarticulate. He isn't a master liar or even a criminal.
0 likesBeing wrong about your perception of events, is not a guilty mind.
He doesn't understand the role of the police officer whose sole goal is to make him appear guilty. This man lacks the requisite intent "mens rea" or guilty mind to be guilty. This is obvious, as he even tells the cop if the video showed differently he wouldn't believe him. There isn't a shred of evidence this man thought or believed he wasn't under attack and at risk for serious bodily harm.
Almost all the comments are about him being wrong in his memory of events. This man did not prepare his responses or review a video tape and simply told his perception. Being wrong is not a crime. 2.5 seconds? Not guilty Sad part is this man probably got reaction training from the same police department.
Not going to argue your last two points cause I agree with them but the first point "mind your own business" is a bad take. In Philadelphia a man groped a woman on a train with her trying to make him stop and no one told him to fuck off or tried to help the woman. Should people just mind their own business when a sexual assault happens?
0 likes@TheNeomaster15 Philly resident. Valid point but sure we are talking about a handicapped parking spot and comparing it to sexual assault. Come on now dawg
0 likes@TheNeomaster15 Well yea, you are 100% right. I would probably get involved, but I meant in petty confrontation like in this video. Confronting someone over parking in a handicap spot in an empty parking lot couldve saved 2 lives. Both McGlockton and Drejka's since there is a high chance he will die in prison.
0 likes@Gerald McDermott I am just taking the original post at face value. We should definitely encourage others to follow the law, even something like a person littering people should be give them the stink eye. Shouting and then pulling a gun... hmmm, that is not the type of encouragement I am thinking of or suggesting.
0 likes@R J I think the fact he went up to the woman in the car and started shouting was definitely the wrong way to go about it.
0 likesA simple "hey I see you don't have a disability placard, I know you are in a rush but someone might need this spot." Would have been much more tactful.
America, the land of the free: Mind your own business, do not speak out against offenses because you should expect to get hurt. Ahh that good old freedom of speech thing still alive and well, in their fantasies...
0 likes@Sereti Lee No matter what if you’re in the interrogation room you should never talk without a lawyer present. It’s very easy to incriminate yourself even if you are not guilty. In this case however this guy is guilty.
0 likesBro, the best advice you could give someone.
0 likesSeems the other guy got a bigger lesson.
0 likesLesson 3: dont walk with gun if you dont know when or when not to use it 😂
0 likesThe 'Miss my girls' comment, referring to his dogs, is a perfect example of how deluded he is. Bro, you offed a person por pushing you. You're crying about your dogs but didn't shed a single tear when the detectives told you that you murdered that man. Ridiculous.
894 likesReplies (32)
hahahah I had no Idea he was referring to dogs.
21 likeshis comment about missing his dogs is so trivial when the children of the man he murdered will certainly miss their father. truly fucked up.
65 likesOr it shows he truly felt justified in self defense. Anything outside of the video like trying to explain someones feelings is speculation.
6 likes@tenkomori bc he is responsible for the unwarranted death of a man and a family with children now suffer, if an animal who’s life is completely pointless is seen as more valuable you have a problem
29 likes@tenkomori people are stronger companions than animals, you know this
15 likes@Sabrason hey, way to victim blame though.
21 likes@Sabrason Woooow! And I totally don't suspect any bias in this comment. (sarcasm, mind you) Did you not watch the whole video, or are you just racist, because I sure don't want to make any assumptions like Michael.
21 likes@Baiaku @Brooke Earhart @Shinozu @Psi
2 likesGuys, let's be fair. Clearly what Michael would be feeling is shame and guilt when he killed him. However, shame, guilt and lonliness are not the same things. Feeling shameful or remorseful for killing someone would not assert a feeling of sadness. Therfore, Michael would not be crying because of guilt either. He may feel guilty, and feels like he deserves what's coming to him, but he still wouldn't feel lonely because he murdered someone he didn't know until a couple of hours ago. When he misses his dogs, he is feeling lonely. He wants a sense of friendship in him, but was sad when he couldn't meet that need. He could have been deluded, but let's be honest here. wouldn't we all be depressed if we were lonely.
Technically, he didn't murder the man. It was manslaughter. Murder is homicide with intent, or homicide that was planned out. Michael was acting in the moment, he didn't plan on killing Markus the night or week before. making it manslaughter, homicide without malice aforethought.
1 like@Sabrason violent animal? Wow
6 likes@Sabrason you just gave an excuse for someone to get killed
0 likesMaybe cause that man attacked him an he shit in self defense?
0 likes@n p their father brought it in himself my attacking Michael
1 like@PhoenixSidePeen Way to side with a drug addicted aggressor
0 likes@Nadia Mendes Anybody who lays hands and commits assault deserves whatever force the victim feels is necessary to prevent further bodily harm = SYG law.
0 likes@Zheka Zheka Exactly, same here and people will continue to do the same thing but they'll be smarter about what they say to police afterward. Many legal experts thought it was a justified SYG shooting but Drejka made the mistake of cooperating with police instead of shutting up and lawyering up and the Judge wanted to punish him for being a wannabe parking lot cop. That's the only reason he was convicted.
0 likes@Sabrason Respect me, i'm not your mother. Don't mistake me for her.
4 likes@Anna Arkless Sabrason has said this same bullshit on multiple other comment threads. He claims to be a gun owner with a concealed carry license, and if that's the case, I fear for the community that he lives in. He has no idea what proper SYG is, and if he were put into this situation, he might've even followed McGlockson into the store and shot him again in the head while he's laying in a pool of blood. I'm a gun owner and I can confidently say that anyone the defends Drejka as Sabrason does, does not deserve to have their 2nd amendment right.
12 likes@Justin thats terrifying, I absolutely agree. Even as a non american, i'm completely in favour of the 2nd amendment and am pro gun - but people like sabrason who clearly pose a threat to people around them should forfeit this right.
8 likesi cant understand how someone could watch this video, learn about the case, see the literal video evidence of mcglockton retreating, and still try to defend his killer. not only that, but call the victim a "violent animal", its honestly a horrifying outlook.
He widow a woman and orphaned a child yet he feels nothing but self pity
0 likesYeah that interview was WTF
0 likes@Anna Arkless I get what your saying but you absolutely can shoot someone for assaulting you because you are afraid that they might kill you. The problem here is that the defendent basically destroyed any defence he might have had by talking to the police as if he was a hero who calmly and sensibly eliminated a threat. Thats a position that you can't really defend.
0 likes@FlavoredRice no, not if he's clearly and obviously retreating. did you watch the video?
0 likes@Anna Arkless "I didn't know he was retreating, all I know is that he was attacked me and wanted to kill me. I was very afraid." This argument has been used to win many, many self defence cases. The defendent here clearly didn't think this was the case and tried to get revenge on an attacker which is obviously not OK.
0 likes@FlavoredRice even if he didnt retreat, killing an unarmed attacker 2 seconds after you were pushed over is an extreme overreaction. he had a lot more time to think and assess the situation, but he was just a trigger happy moron who killed a guy who was trying to protect his family
0 likes@Anna Arkless Shoving a man half your size and twice your age to the ground without so much as a word for talking to your wife is not defending your family. That's assault.
1 like@FlavoredRice yes, its assault. but he wasnt "talking" to his wife, he was shouting at her. and assault, unless theres a clear reason to believe that the other person is armed and ready to kill (which obviously wasnt the case), is no excuse for shooting to kill without even thinking
0 likes@Anna Arkless Yelling at someone isn't grounds for assault. And you don't have to be armed to kill. You can kill someone with your bare hands. You dont need to verify that the man has a weapon to be justified in self defence. In this case, the defendent was in the wrong. His actions would have been justified if he had shot multiple times immediately after drawing his firearm(or in other words, in a panic). But he waited 2-3 seconds, fired once, then boasted about it to police. He wasn't afraid, and so it wasn't justified.
0 likes@Psi He took a step back but could've pulled a firearm and fired back at Drejka at the same time so there was no way to know in that moment. It's not like he put his hands up and said "don't shoot" --- he didn't say anything. A hoplophobe is somebody who's anti-gun, not pro-gun. If you don't live in the US and are not familiar with our SYG laws then you're not qualified to offer an intelligent opinion about it.
0 likes@Baby Face My gf's black so how can I be a racist?
0 likes@filler Not true but anything can be used as a weapon including body parts (hands, feet, etc). SYG laws define when a person can use LETHAL force to prevent further bodily harm, not you and your nonsense opinions.
0 likes@Sabrason firstly, you have no clue what MDMA does. If anything, it would make someone the opposite of likely to kill someone.
0 likesSecondly, the video evidence clearly shows mcglockton retreating. if you watch the literal video tape of the killing, there is absolutely no other conclusion you can come to unless you delude yourself.
im no hoplophobe, i love guns and think all people, other than dangerous people who think its okay to shoot someone who's retreating, should be able to carry one.
please just watch the video with your eyes actually open, and at least try to leave your racial bias at the door beforehand, okay?
I hate that their children witnessed their dads death like that. That must've been so hard to get over :(
389 likesReplies (14)
No getting over that shit... That's a scar for life
77 likes@More Human Than Human As a person who has lived though something like this and not having a dad. Yes. It is a horrible and painful scar you will have to deal with no matter what. Nothing can replace the person who put you in this world.
48 likes@CR3MLINS unless they like abused you
3 likesBut he didn't so what you say is true.
@Hollow (Trapped in a elevator) even when parents abuse children they still love them. people can’t really tell the difference between love and abuse
2 likesI'd say impossible to get over
2 likes@Obi-Wan Kenobi “Mike is the dumbass”
3 likesYes but are you implying that the guy who shoved him wasn’t also unbelievably stupid? lol
Its terrible man. I do think the guy is an asshole for pushing and staying at a handicapped spot, but holy shit be killed over that is crazy. And those kids, that's seriously terrible.
5 likesSad face :(
0 likes@Brent Gocavs You too.
2 likes@The_Gamer_Dad_79 Ja
0 likesYup, they never getting over that, they just have to deal with it...
0 likes@Obi-Wan Kenobi “more stupid”
0 likesSo by this I’m gathering that you agree the physical aggressor was stupid as well? I’m glad we agree.
I think you missed the part of my original reply where I said “Yes” as in “I agree Mike is a dumbass.”
@George Clarke Im pretty sure they were 4 years of age minimum.
0 likes@ThunderChungus the child is unable to tell the difference between a loving family and an unloving one
0 likesAs a someone who also conceal and carries, this is so out of line... carrying a gun doesn’t make you a tough guy. His life was never in danger. He was looking for a reason to pull his weapon, also he has a history of it. He’s the type of person who wants everyone to know that he carries and it strokes his ego by doing it... the outcome of this doesn’t surprise me at all.
610 likesReplies (21)
Exactly! I have a CCP and being a disabled vet with a handicap placard I get annoyed when people park in handicapped spots when they don’t have one. Yet I never go off on someone for it to create a problem or say anything. Maybe a shake of my head that’s it. Which is funny because people have no issues saying stuff to me assuming I must of stole my grandmas placard. Lol
19 likesExactly! Hes got an inferiority complex he trys to fix prophalactically with a gun. Rich
8 likessad weak man...his fragile EGO...how dare someone push me to the ground...over something he started...
10 likesDamn straight
0 likes@EL34Glo Damn gay
0 likes@rogue eskimo lol
0 likesConcealed carry everyday because I live in the woods and it’s kind of necessary. I’ve even been in fights while carrying and never drawn my firearm! I believe in gun rights but people should have to get a real psychological evaluation before you can concealed carry or own anything besides a 22 caliber.
9 likeswrong, store owner had no clue he carried
0 likesDude blind sided him and he hit pretty damn hard on the pavement. All because his lazy ass didn't park in a regular parking spot. To say his life wasn't in danger is a total lie. The reason people carry is to protect themselves, and the only reason the attacker didn't follow up with punches and kicks was that he saw the man had a gun. If he didn't have a gun he would have been seriously beaten.
4 likesJust took the course; we covered this case.
0 likesWait a min he could've died on the spot if he hit his head bouncing from that sidewalk like whaaat ? He was assaulted
2 likes@S P That's why you don't talk to the cops. Even when you're innocent, they'll pry and pry until they get a contradiction in your narrative. They're the second prosecution attorney.
0 likesWe all know he was about to get a beating , the woman got out of the car as soon as she seen her man come out of the store . If he didn't pull out that gun It was going down . Truth is everyone was at fault, the woman started everything by parking in a handicap spot , the shooter should have just minded his own business, but to ignore the victim was acting aggressive, he stepped it up , escalated the situation , violence was not called for and he paid the ultimate penalty.
0 likes@Jac S Right. Assumed the "Black guy", who immediately begin to retreat once he knew the killer was armed with a gun, his hands clearly visibleand empty, was armed "to". Even thre killer admits that he saw nonweapon, and that he thought that he was about to be attacked "kicked". If you want to defend this lying murderer, just try and defend him outright. Don't try and defend him while pretending to be objective in the face of facts which clearly prove otherwise.
1 likeHow would he know his life wasn’t in danger when he was pushed hard to the floor??
0 likesAnthony Michael Durkin so it’s ok for somebody to put their hands on him when he was just shouting? She was shouting to! He was not the first person to use violence the dead guy is!! See how that turned out for him! Maybe he shouldn’t have pushed him over!?
0 likesLuna EB fucking idiot!! What a stupid comment
0 likesHow interesting Americans frequently talk about using and having guns for defense. This guy bought into that sales pitch. It cost a young man his life. This consequence is surely foreseeable. He is a victim of his self righteousness and fear. The young man who died too eas a casualty of the gun loving culture that is everywhere.
0 likesWell, my thing is this, if you get attacked and pushed to the ground how do you know they're not about to stomp you or take your weapon?
2 likesThat’s why everyday citizens should not have access to guns!! It is insane, America’s gun laws are NUTS.
0 likes@Cheryl Lees nah thats exactly why they should have guns. And anybody with a gang affiliation needs to be detained immediately 👌🏻
1 likeNot enough people are mentioning (although I only thought about it when someone else mentioned) this dude flat out drove up to the woman's car, parked illegally himself, and then started yelling at her loud enough to get her husband's attention inside the store.
319 likesHe certainly doesn't care about law and order, and thinks he's above the law in enforcing his will on others, so he can feel like a big man with a gun.
He must've seen who was in the car from a way off, and for some reason decided to antagonize her.
Replies (6)
Exactly, I would only add to your first paragraph, WITH A LOADED GUN??!?! This man is clearly insane
16 likesWe all know why he started the argument after seeing a black woman in the car
4 likesracism indeed
0 likes@largestbiddie if he’d done his due diligence and waited half a second after drawing his gun they guy probably would have backed off. Self defense with a firearm doesn’t have to equate to shooting someone with it. It happens without a shot fired all the time. <edit> he was already backing off 🤦♂️
1 like@Mike Neuburger the gun wasn't there for self defense. It was a "force multiplier" to win fights.
0 likes@Hammerest yep, see my edit. He clearly had no intention of avoiding a confrontation from the beginning. He’s not a cop, or the proprietor so where they parked was literally none of his business.
0 likesSuch a senseless loss of Life. Those children are now left without a daddy not to mention that little boy has got to have PTSD from watching his father die in front of his eyes. People need to learn (or Re-learn,) how to de-escalate.
1074 likesThis dude is a CLOWN. He makes self defenders look bad. He was thinking “oh yess I finally get to use my pistol as self defense” that’s why it took 2 seconds to pull the trigger. He couldn’t help himself. He wanted to use it
1231 likesReplies (53)
So if someone throws you to the ground over a verbal dispute would you be comfortable trusting your aggressor to not kick you in the head? I personally would not trust a person physically attacking me. Being on the ground is a dangerous place to be. Look at the the people being attacked while on the ground in the recent riots. I already had to relearn how to walk once, and really don’t want to go through that again.
20 likes@Spektor 22 umm yea, if it happened exactly like it DID happen. Dude pushed him and backed away. He wasn’t charging. And I would have seen that and told s him I don’t want any trouble. If u carry a gun it’s on you to de escalate so u don’t have to use your pistol. At the very MOST all he had to do was pull his pistol out and show the dude.
157 likes@Spektor 22 so you’re supporting on what he did
26 likes@Spektor 22 It seems like everyone defending this guy has an equally stupid false dichotomy. "Would you rather do nothing?" "Are you supposed to just take it?" "Would you just trust your attacker?"
77 likesNone of you seem to understand the fact that he could have kept the gun aimed at him until he left, then call the police and/or leave the area.
@Balloon Eater You don't get to shoot someone just because they "might" have a gun. Anyone could pull a gun on you, that doesn't give you the right to shoot them just in case.
59 likesIf that's the case then the push was also justified because he "might" have attacked his wife.
@Think Tank ummm okaaay.....?
15 likes@-- perfect counter argument. i didnt think of that
5 likesWe don’t live in a war zone, so it’s not wise to get training on using deadly force - your subconscious might seek out a situation where you could use it. One slip and you might get your fantasy, but at the cost of your freedom (society needs to be protected). Why society is keen to put shooters in jail, but strongly resists gun control is a bit of a paradox however. It seems the spirit of the law and special interest lobby groups are in a tug-of-war.
10 likesbeing a self defender is important. Doesn’t matter that we don’t live in a war zone. Some people are just too stupid to own guns. But tha law is tha law and it won’t change just cuz he was irresponsible with a firearm
6 likesExactly this CLOWN is the reason people want to repeal the 2nd amendment.
7 likesThe preamble of the narrator made it sound like the other guy was on top of him. When I saw a guy on his knees aiming a gun at a guy that really wasn't moving it threw me for a loop. The presentation of a firearm was an escalation of force, the use of a brandished firearm is too convey that further aggression will.be met with deadly force.
5 likes@Riptide omg NO, how did u not understand what I said? It’s quite simple to read
0 likesJust saying “Self defenders” already makes you look like someone who is waaaay too in self defense
4 likesYeah once I saw the video and the amount of time it took for him to draw, aim, and fire. He was 100% in the wrong. He got shoved. That act alone does not warrant a deadly force response.
7 likesshane glass Don’t like the option of your life being taken from you? Don’t put your hands on another human being, and your chances of surviving go way up. Words are not a reason to ever throw someone to the ground, and if you do then you may not being going home.
0 likes@Spektor 22 understanding force escalation is also key because you could also use too much force.
7 likesYea like he literally just pushed him. I feel this guy was just going out to make someone mad so he could shoot someone and say he did it if u get what I’m saying
3 likes@Spektor 22 don’t start pointless arguments with women in a car then
4 likesDon't even bother, most men in the comment section here haven't even been in a brawl before.
1 like@Bobby Flay that’s what any logical person would think
0 likes@Mr D he hasn’t responded to ur msgs lolol
0 likes@BABY ALEX idk what you’re talkin about...?
0 likesYep and he’s the reason why we need mental screenings before owning a carry permit
0 likes@--
0 likes>You don't get to shoot someone just because they "might" have a gun. Anyone could pull a gun on you, that doesn't give you the right to shoot them just in case.
Not really what happened here. You conveniently didn't include the part where he got violently shoved to the ground out of nowhere...
Thank you. I agree.
0 likesWhy was he only charged with manslaughter?
@Spektor 22 man pull the gun but if the guy is clearly backing away then your point is proven, you’re safe.
0 likesReading through this thread makes it seem like Americans care more about freedom than people's life. "Even if he’s in the wrong it’s not the risk of my freedom." No emphasis on the life you would take. (I'm for self-defense, but the mentality I see surrounding it is worrying)
1 likeWhat this guy said
0 likes@Mr D I've been involved in multiple situations unfortunately where someone gets shoved, then gets up and fights. What follows is a pissed off person with backup and weapons to retaliate. It's not so cut an dry like you make it seem. If you push/punch/whatever someone to the ground, expect retaliation. I'm not justifying anything, just saying what is real.
0 likes@Robert Mercer That's what I'm seeing people don't how to use fists anymore.
0 likesAnyone defending this mans actions on killing a man proves that all of you should not beyond any circumstance, own or operate any firearm. Y’all are clowns and cowards. I wouldn’t trust y’all with karate lessons. Focus on growing up as human beings instead of reverting back to children in adult bodies.
1 like@Timothy Bayliss watch closely 2:30 black guy walk to shooter before he pull gun and after pushing him. It is preposterous to asume that pulling up gun was escalation because it prevent white guy to get beat up. And rightly so because when You have a gun you have to pull it before someone can take it from you or beat you because then it was to late. BUT when black guy back down and don't move ONLY THEN white guy can deescalate situation, as he should. Killing him in this situation was murder, he should have call cops if he fell hurt by that push, but killing someone for that is crazy.
0 likes@Bobby Flay no you can't. Pleace yourself in that situation. If You have a gun you cant take kick in head because you provide gun to someone who have no boundies. You can't do that. Thats why pulling gun in this situation was 100% correct. BUT shoting someone was simply wrong, and only that part.
0 likes@Spektor 22 he was literally looking for trouble. It’s not his job to see which car should be in a disabled parking spot or not, if there was a problem he should have called the right people to deal with it. He intentionally started a fight and even had his pistol on him. He just wanted to boost his ego with his gun
1 likePersonally I don’t trust violent thugs
0 likes@sc666666well I wouldn’t have shot I woulda showed the pistol and put distance between us.. I get it tho, you play stupid games you win stupid prizes. But the punishment didn’t fit the crime. The fact is, he wasn’t gonna keep attacking. He pushed and walked away a little. And if he did everything he did BESIDES shoot, it woulda ended there
0 likes@-- that’s real!!!!
0 likes@Brandon Ice they parked illigaly thats why he was pissed at them and annoying them to get them to move there car lol
0 likes@Gordon Collins WHEN your in a sitation like that you dont know whats happening im not saying the guys a good person but i think its compleatly justifyable him pulling the gun out i dont think people relise how much damage someone can do to you if your on the ground kick to the head could give you brain damage you dont want that shit he wants the agressor in this sitaution either he was the one that got attacked
0 likes@-- yup
0 likes@sc666666 "most likely a thug" uhh slightly sus on the racism scale
0 likes@Gordon Collins sooooo his thug violence in the video doesn’t count?
0 likes@Mr D so you would’ve brandished a firearm without feeling the threat to use it? You realize there have been deaths from throwing people to the pavement with that force.
0 likes@sc666666 ok, will do. Thanks
0 likes@sc666666 are you okay?
0 likes@William Sundbaum fine! But your asking is racist.
0 likes@sc666666 no what you said was suspiciously racist, i'm not a racist for pointing it out lol
0 likes@William Sundbaum sure you are. Probably a colonist also.
0 likes@sc666666 bold accusation from one that assumed that the man who died from a "self defense" act was "most likely a thug" because of his skin color.
0 likes@SizzleBae what? “Even if he’s in the wrong it’s not the risk of my freedom”. Yeah that’s right. I carry and if I was in this situation, I would have not shot at alllll! Because I don’t wanna kill him OR go to prison cuz I woulda known it wouldn’t be justifiable
0 likes@sc666666 true with “play stupid games win stupid prizes” but he clearly didn’t have to shoot. And that’s just a fact. It doesn’t matter how hard the shove was. He’s wasn’t going to do anything more. Especially when he saw the pistol coming out. Dude even pointed the pistol at him for 2.5 seconds and the dude was backing away. He DIDNT have to pull the trigger. U hold your aim on him, get up, back away and leave and call police. If he done that he’d be free and the dude woulda got his due punishment for the assault
0 likes@Mr D It does matter how hard the shove was, you don’t know if he would’ve done anything else, you don’t know if anyone was coming out of the car to aid in the attack. It is questionable how long it took for him to shoot.
0 likes@sc666666 well u made my point. It’s questionable. The fact there was enough time for him to assert the situation, and NOTHING WAS GOING TO HAPPEN. But he still pressed the trigger. And that’s why he lost in court too
0 likesThis is the guy who binge watches all Active Self Protection videos, skipping over all the lessons and then carries a handgun around just PRAYING he get's the chance to use it. He's the perfect example of a person who shouldn't carry and we can all do our part to grind our teeth from all his cringe and learn his stupid lessons too.
1552 likesReplies (15)
The entire time all that kept going through my mind was active self protection...although i KNOW he would NOT approve even if he hasn't already went over this exact video I just had a feeling it was those videos or those types that made him feel like it was ok...clearly only taking bits and pieces out he has missed the bigger picture. All the tactical shit he claims to have done he did horribly even if in the moment u should still be able to tell if someone is holding still or moving towards or away from you and why start some shit if you need to bring a pistol to a fist fight!?
14 likes@Vivi Gesso Really?
5 likesI have to agree with you 100%. So many people carry that should never even have access to a firearm.
4 likesMost that carry are very responsible and the last thing they want is a confrontation of any kind.
6 likesPretty sure that's you dude lol
0 likesHe did not cover his asp
0 likes@Vivi Gesso So Happy to read that. Myself would have done the same, maybe worst
2 likes@Liyakun Montenegro Yep, a dude in jail has beat him with a lock in a sock, he was maybe trying to protect the handicap toilet and forgot that he didn't have his gun in there. The guy with the sock should have a medal for that.
7 likes@Andrew Aeterno Sad to hear what happened to you, but don't let it ruin your life today. Put it behind you and stay positive. Hope you have a lucky and happy future.
3 likesDefinitely a lesson to be careful of confrontation, if you address something with negatively what do you expect to get out of it. There is a way to educate someone about a wrong doing without creating confrontation, not they they aren’t like this guy. I guarantee had he been the one in the car it would have ended the same way he wanted a negative reaction probably based off first glance of the person sadly.
2 likes@Andrew Aeterno Okay
0 likeswell said
0 likesThis is why people need to learn actual gun safety and learn how to act with guns. Guns are just tools. No different from a power saw or a drill. Humans are the only thing that can add intent to any action carried out with any firearm. This is what happens when idiots get ahold of dangerous tools. Just like the kind of idiots who cut their finger off with a circular saw or hit themselves with a chainsaw because they aren't practicing basic safety protocols. Except this guy was a step beyond, he wanted to cause an accident with the tool he didn't understand.
2 likesI watch those vids alot but I'm not permitted to carry my pistol concealed so I never do but even if I did I'd think 3 times before pulling it out especially when I know I'm not a fucking navy seal or anything like that god forbid a stray bullet hits a kid or something like that I couldn't live with myself if I did that and I never put myself in positions like this or start fights because I feel all big with a gun in my waistband. This man should obviously never owned a firearm some people can't handle having all that killing potential in their holster and let it get to their head. My brother got rid of a rifle he had because he was having mental issues and knew it wouldn't be responsible for other people around him to keep it. Responsible gun owners usually never let it be known they have a gun and don't act offensively. Especially don't go looking for trouble
0 likesActive Self Protection 😂😂😂 He probably pictures himself like he's Bruce Willis in "Die Hard" 😂😂😂
2 likesWhen you are carrying a firearm, you have a moral obligation to avoid and de-escalate confrontation at all costs. Even if it means seeming like a coward to someone being aggressive.
296 likesYou definitely don't start screaming at people for stuff like parking in a handicapped spot. The gun isn't a second dick. It doesn't make you a tough guy.
Replies (4)
Glad to see there are SOME people in the comments who know the first thing about CC.
13 likesWell said Bigfoot
5 likesyes this.
0 likesSee I’m anti-gun, but I love this take, we need more people like you, it would make America a much safer place
1 likeWow, the defense attorney was reaching... ''The colour was off, definitely not HD quality video''
0 likesThere was no need for him to shoot the guy but man he did only pull the trigger once. Most ppl survive when getting shot once unless it’s a bullseye in the head or heart
0 likesif he was there everyday then he would know that there are cameras. guess he forgot that
0 likesHe’s so “Tacticool”.
0 likesNothing is more dangerous than a American who failed to become a cop or who wants to be one and can't be
1 likeDefense lawyer sounded like he was reading a lullaby 😴😴😴
0 likesI got a Cheerios ad before this video. A video that the first sentence starts with "The definition of justifiable homicide..."
1 likeYou know, he initiated the first confrontation with the woman. Then In hand to hand, he shot a man. The man had no weapon, and a few seconds went by then he’s shot. I carry every day, but I’d never shoot unless they shoot at me first. Otherwise we can do hand to hand combat. I’d rather a few bumps and bruises and a headache than taking a man’s life. I’ve done two tours in Afghanistan as an 11B. I’ve boxed since I was 9. I’d rather give or take an a••whooping than to take that person’s last breath from them. Just my opinion though🤷♂️. But he could’ve avoided all this, he just felt too big. He misused his rights. People like him are scum, and impulsive.
0 likesMy heart breaks for Marquise McGlouglin, Brittany Jacob’s and their precious children. Michael Derek’s is a vigilante run amok. He wasn’t your regular vigilante. He was out looking to kill someone and he did. First degree murder.
0 likesTo collapse in front of my son.. What gives me life itself... Idk.. My thoughts wouldve been of him and thinking ive got to make it, I cant leave him/them.. Im just speculating here but the white guy couldve actually been fearing for his life but if it was me. If I had to pull the gun out it wouldve been because the other guy pulled a gun out. A man defending his woman is nothing the be killed over and all over parking in a handicapped space? Dude your not batman! And he doesnt look handicap himself! Just park somewhere else and go on about your business.. But no instead hes got to make a big deal about it and take a father away from his children.. In front of them no less.. These are reasons I hate my own race.
0 likesHe caused everything by being a Karen. The father was doing what a father is supposed to do.
0 likesLol I'm assuming the racism from the convict here is so painfully obvious that no one felt the need to comment on it. "She was probably smoking crack" and the concept of black children losing their father and a wife losing her husband to gun violence at the hands of a self-entitled white man.
0 likesBut genuinely, also appreciate the comments detailing gun ownership responsibilities - very cool
Replies (1)
Would it be any different if he lost his life to gun violence at the hands of a fellow black?
0 likesThere is another one not minding his business and playing the enforcer and starting stuff then when overpowered talks about "self defense". If someone is physically assaulted you should intervene if you can. But if some idiot is parked in a handicapped spot, as uncivil, selfish, pathetic (and criminal) as it may be, just mention it to the person if you want, but don't start something, then talk about self defense. Had he not started this he would never have had to self defend himself. You can't instigate a situation then claim to be the victim.
1 like19 min to respond to someone being shot.... 19 min...... wow.
0 likesHe just needs a little PRISON in his life and he'll be alright.
0 likesThat cop reminds me of Hank from Breaking Bad
1 like40:26 Definitely a stretch in basically accusing him of being a racist.
0 likes39:30 "anything you would change about what happened"... and he says no...
0 likesWho does he work for? The enforcer without pay? He has had issues from Childhood! I bet that to be true!
0 likesThis man was prepared to kill that whole family
1 like19 minute reponse time by EMS is insane, I thought America was a 1st world country
0 likesYou know what a force multiplier is. Ah no, we don’t lol
1 like43:18 People said the same thing about Jeffrey Dahmer.
0 likes19 minutes for someone who got shoot wow we all know why it took so long........
0 likesCops asking questions = Nails in the coffin
0 likesI completely agree that this guy is guilty of murder. But the thing that annoys me is that a police officer would have done exactly the same as him in his situation. Both murderers that can't fight fairly.
0 likes"I neutralized the threat"... said the wanna be.
1 likeHis hand got healed miraculously by the 18th minute
0 likesHe was itching to use that gun for decades.
1 likeThis is why you shut up and never speak to the cops!
2 likesAn Armed Karen, what a coward
2 likesViolence has consequences.
1 likeAs a human being, we are born with ego, self-esteem, pride and hot temper. From what i saw in this, the black guy came and pushed the white guy fall down to the street. What else has fallen? All the listed above, and that'd trigger the incident causes both of them paid a very high price.
0 likesLol again still laugh at this heres an idea iv had people argue with my girl friends before unless they physically harm her I see no point in shoving a man to the ground. XD Poor guy he went before his brother Fentanyl Floyd. THUG LIFE
0 likesIt's the little things about this story. The way he describes shooting a man in the chest as "neutralizing a threat". The way he snidely reacts to the fact that she has kids in the car 24:50 , and the way he balks at even taking the bullets out of the magazine, as if it's ridiculous not to be ready to kill someone at a moment's notice. This is not the first time he confronted random people with a gun, either. He was waiting for something like this to happen so he could be G.I. Joe. This guy is self-righteous POS and deserves to be locked up.
11 likesIs this the mythical "good guy with a gun"?
1 likeI'm shocked this guy doesnt work for Metro States Jeremy DeWitt.
2 likesReplies (1)
They look related 😂
0 likesnot really the point of the video but 35:30. HOW the hell can you be a Cop and not know what "force multiplier" means I'm in the UK which has the rarest shooting instince and still know what that means. Weird.
0 likesHe quite eloquently convicted himself....bawahahaha
1 likeThe disabled parking enforcer is so inspiring! What heroism and bravery, to stand up for what is just and right, acting with such level headed judgment in the face of danger, he puts even the most hardened war veterans to shame!
2 likesI park far from all when I go anywhere. The world is to crazy to make a mistake these days.
0 likesDrejka is disgusting, to watch him cry bc he missing his children was really pathetic.
0 likesThe little children they were in the car have now a life without a father and his wife without her husband. Just bc some moron wanted to play a cop ?? I mean 30y are not enough. The man lost his life and not only 30y. I would give drejka life in prison without a parole.
from the CCTV footage you can see the black dude backing off once he pushed. that alone means a threat is gone.
0 likesIsnt it funny how people look the part? You can take one look at this guy and go "yeah, I can totally see him flipping his shit at the slightest provocation"
2 likesHe ask the detective where did the guy even come from?? U no where he came frome because in the beginning u said the guy ran back into the store after u shot him y would u say back into the store 🤔 because u see him coming the whole time
1 likeNext time you park in a handicap spot think: is this spot to die for?
1 likehes not a racist a narcissist is more fitting for this guy he thought he was the dark knight of handicap parking spots
9 likesReplies (1)
Ehhhh I'd still call him a racist but I get what you're saying
1 likeI mean obviously you don't go shooting people.
0 likesThat aside, the illegal parking of the woman and the shove of the man is also an "interesting" feature.
It's more like two bad things collide and the worse "wins".
Somehow the defense attorney is worse than his client, he's trying to do that "Alternative Facts Trump" voice thing
0 likesgood work from the pro
0 likesI see a lot of people saying the shooter was in the wrong and people saying the other guy shouldn’t have assaulted him.
0 likesLegally speaking. Yes. You are correct. Unless he was verbally threatening the guys wife with violence - he legally should not have shoved him like that.
However. As a man. I don’t get why anyone would make such a big deal about him being parked there for 2 minutes. And if I came out and some guy was screaming at my girlfriend and saying god knows what .. I would probably either yell at him or push him or some shit
I think this guy took an over dramatic dive when he pushed him. And I think this guy WANTED to shoot this man. Like he 100 percent did it out of anger. And not self defense. Which is fucking insane.
If I had a gun on me. I would NOT be going out of my way to potentially get into a physical altercation. I think you are agreeing to certain principles when you carry a gun.
Guy shouldn't have been shot, but I don't see why he ran up and pushed the shooter. They were just arguing. A friend of mine pushed a drunk guy who fell, hit his head on the concrete and died. A family man. My buddy had his life pretty much destroyed because of that incident.
0 likesI'm not sure why, but him complaining about his arm and pretty much acting like it's broken really pissed me off. You're fine, the guy you killed....isnt
1386 likesReplies (39)
because he is manipulative pretending his arm is hurt
50 likesYou see him lean on it so many times and propping himself up using his "injured" arm. That part really pissed me off too, like a school yard bully who cries the second someone hits them back.
39 likesHe was able to flick his cap onto the table using that arm, amazing how his arm also got better as the interview went along, he forgot to pretend it was injured!!
18 likesI thought the exact same thing.. such a coward
7 likeslove how he smacks his arm against his body to show how he fell, moves it around all the fucking time, then goes back to acting like he can’t move it
17 likesExactly what I was thinking. Disgusting guy.
8 likesRight! He's acting like ohhh poor me, my arm hurts. And as you guys said, it's clearly bullshit and he's completely fine. It's also pretty chilling how he legit doesn't seem to think he did anything wrong and talks to the cops as if he's one of them. This guy is legit dangerous.
14 likesHe was attacked first though.
10 likes@Ismail He was pushed to the ground for harassing someone he really had no business harassing. Call the cops if you must. The point is drawing the gun was more than enough, he had zero reason to pull the trigger. That man is dead. As others have pointed out, it seems pretty clear he is exaggerating his "injury", and is looking for pity when his idiotic actions resulted in someone dying.
14 likesAlthough I would agree that he shouldn't have shoved him. I prefer using reason first. But there was zero justification for him pulling that trigger. You watched the video I assume, so you know that. No one is going to feel bad for his bruised elbow (and ego clearly) when he shot and killed a man because he felt like it.
8 likes@Jakub Lizon him saying something about a handicapped space isnt 'harrassment' .. (at all ..!) and no one has any right to get VIOLENT when someone points out youre parked illegally in a handicapped spot .. had the other guy not gotten violent, he'd still be around .. period .
7 likesHow would you like it if somebody hurt your arm? This man needs medical attention and the case should be postponed until he is at 100%
3 likes@taliwakka27 Lmao!
1 like@BEAUTYnIQ It doesn't matter if he pushed him, using a gun on someone is always the most extreme option you can take in any situation. He could have used the gun to get him to back off, get himself on his feet, and leave, but instead he pulls the trigger, even as the guy is backing off. Self-defense stops being self-defense once the person you feel endangered by is no longer a threat.
9 likesHe wasn't just pointing out she was in a handicapped spot, he was apparently angrily confronting her and screaming at her at the top of his lungs, and you can see this from the gesticulating in the footage, so her boyfriend probably assumed he was a threat to her and pushed him to get him to back off. No, he shouldn't have pushed him, but he was all too eager to use that gun, even after the pusher backed off. And the shooter should have just reported them to the store, because no, whether or not someone is in a handicapped spot is not his business and if he thinks someone shouldn't be there the easiest avenue is to talk to store management who'll get them towed.
True, but the dead guy had it coming
2 likesSo if he broke his arm he is not allowed to complain about it?
3 likesDude got freed @ last - freed @ last.. Freed from this Insane asylum where diversity is our strength
2 likes@Phil Mycrackin .Thank you Phil for noticing. It's very kind of you.Well, I'm off to see the Wizard.
0 likes@Dr. Lex Winter .I can't wait to see how the media spins this race war when it goes off soon.kinda like all the other Polls I suppose...LOL
1 likeThat wasn't even much of a push. A normal guy would lose and then catch his balance. So much for his self-defense reaction. The guy was so intent on yelling at the woman that he allowed someone to blindside shove him.
2 likes@Phil Mycrackin I agree with you.
1 likeif he truly broke his arm he would be crying in pain, broken bones hurt with the slightest movements
3 likes@vaneast411 Yeah also him as a kid learned from someone if he does anything wrong put it on his own pain for the sympathy and changing subject. Kids acts like that usually.
0 likes@sugo - That's not true actually, I broke my arm when I was 18 and didn't feel a thing. I was at work at the time and a colleague rushed me to the hospital, I was telling them to slow down because I wasn't going to die FFS! Lol... While there the nurse took off my shirt and said "you're long", I replied "that's what they all say", she went bright red! Lol I'm 6'4 and so long arms obviously...
0 likesAny way I was convinced I had dislocated my shoulder. They gave me an x-ray and after that was done came back in and said I wouldn't make a very good doctor, because it was broken! XD
All that time I felt no pain and was laughing and joking. I was in shock though most likely.
snaz27 same here actually, ive broken both within the last 6 months, i was laughing and joking too, it just hurt on the car ride there, any bump got amplified
0 likes@vaneast411 Did you watch him take that hard shove and fall directly onto his arm without breaking his fall? Yeah... It's not acting. That guy really assaulted him. He really hurt his arm.
0 likes@ian mcavoy he needs fluids and lots of rest to help prevent the bruising from worsening. And no handcuffs, they could disrupt the blood flow
0 likesThe guy pushed him from behind. For talking to his Baby mama. .
0 likesYou really believe these cops dont realize what hes doing by favoring his arm like that? Lol theyve seen it all
0 likesIf the black guy didn't blindside Michael Drejka, he would be alive today. FACT!
0 likes@Dr. Lex Winter tell you what I wouldn't do if someone pushed me onto concrete and I had no serious damage. I wouldn't jump up like a cowardly psycho and kill someone with a loaded gun.
1 like@xlr8r2010Oh you're just saying huh? And if drejka wasn't cold blooded enough to shoot a man because he felt like it, he'd be alive. He is in prison for good reason. It wasn't self defense, this man was no longer any theat, he was backing off. Are you saying it was appropriate for drejka to shoot and kill him after simply pulling the gun had already ended it? Your choice if words is very telling, as if you don't want to say it, but genuinely don't give a shit drejka wrongfully killing this man. Or you just have a disturbingly twisted sense of justice, and believe we should just kill each other in revenge. If I'm wrong, go ahead and explain.
2 likes@Dr. Lex Winter Would you start an argument you didn't need to with someone parked in a handicapped spot? Then proceed to raise your voice so loud that someone felt the need to defend the person you were clearly yelling at? Of course YOU wouldn't. But he did, and he was all too quick to use his gun. In a situation that really didn't call for it.
0 likes@Lookingglass Yeah, nah. You're simplifying too much. Homeboy obviously felt the need to defend his woman. Plus this dude had a gun, he shouldn't even be in a position where's he arguing with anyone. Most people who have their arms registered don't go start fights for no reason.
0 likes@James Ryder, it seems the guy went out with the intention of starting an argument then shooting someone.
0 likes@Roc ROCA EXACTLY!! Thank you!
1 like@xlr8r2010 Nice bait, cute.
0 likes@James Ryder If the shove never happened...the gun, never gets fired. TRUTH!
0 likes@xlr8r2010 Nah. If homeboy just minded his own business and stayed in his car. Didn't start an argument with oldgirl. He wouldn't be in jail right now.
0 likesAs well like I said. He knew he had a gun with him, legally he had no business trying to start or have an argument with anyone, period.
If I registered my arms/hands as lethal weapons legally I can't start an altercation, or be apart of one because my hands are registered weapons. All anyone has to say is that they saw me raise my hand/arm, and I'm liable to get life just by swaying my arm. Even if no one got seriously hurt.
am I the only one here who sometimes just scrub through the JCS videos until I hear commentary?
0 likesHow to dig your own grave with idiotic statements...
1 like47:20 Protect your family from what a white dude talking about how you shouldn't be parked there ohh yeah that's a valid reason to go and tackle someone to protect your family right imagine
0 likesThe cadence and tone of the defense attorney is INFURIATING.
0 likesBruh... dude literally pulled the gun out saw him backing up not wanting to piss off a dude with a gun then he just shoots hin like wtf? And thats aftet the fact hes just defending his wife and child from some strange old dude all im their face arround their car
1 likeYa this guy thought he was a cop meathead poor fella that got killed right in front of his family hope his family is doing OK.
0 likesDamn this is why if u ain’t got one on you, you don’t put your hands on no one. This world is ruthless
0 likesHis lack of remorse is likely due to being celebrated and protected by the white power/Nazis in prison while also being surrounded by people who confirm the bias that led him to shoot the victim in the first place, so I'm not sure why I was so shocked when he said it.
0 likes“I neutralized the immediate threat🤓🤓🤓🤓”
3 likesManslaughter is bs in this case
0 likesHis Lawyer sounds so bored.
2 likesBemuses me why people in America are allowed to have firearms legally on their person. A gun makes you a coward in my opinion, if he felt threatened he should have got up and fought with his fists like a real man.
0 likesReplies (1)
Thats how someone gets killed. "Fighting like a real man" 🤓
0 likesWait now...is he at a parking lot or on the battlefield??
0 likeswhy did the ambulance take 90 minutes to get there wtf thats so long
0 likesAs soon Drejka entered detectives AZZ I knew no remorse whatsoever, no guilt in his mind, like he will get scott free, well it aint 50s and yeah, CCTV brah.
0 likesHow many times has this man seen John wick?
0 likesPoor little boy seeing his dad shot ☹️🥺
2 likesReplies (1)
Don't push people. Mess around and find out lmao 🤣
0 likesMichael’s lawyer DESTORYED
0 likes1 word....TRAGEDY !
0 likesA coward with to much time on his hands
2 likesReplies (1)
And he supposedly retired at 35.
0 likeshad little to do w/parking enforcement.
0 likesOver a fuckin parking spot...he makes me physically ill. His demeanor urkes me
0 likesHis lawyer seems tired haha
0 likesMiss you Jim!!!
0 likesHe keeps forgetting about his hurt arm. When he first started he couldn’t hardly move it. During the interview he forgets it’s hurt at times.
1297 likesReplies (16)
Sudden recovery what a miracle..
52 likes@moskov1 the sudden injury....
2 likesIt’s possible adrenaline produced from playing through the scenario probably helped him forget about the pain. He may also have been given a pain pill at some point.
34 likesIncredible that injuries can heal over time isnt it
15 likes@Pepsolman the adrenaline from lying to the cop?? Lmao
38 likes@Haley T yes. 💯 %
14 likes@Pepsolman it’s also possible he is a clown with bad acting skills.
21 likes@Haley T I was once interrogated by cops i didn't do anything and i was so scared and pumped with adrenaline for sure. I didn't lie, didn't do anything wrong and yes it was horrible experience ......... Especialy in times of internet and hundred of cases of falsely accused people that ended up in prison for long time. It's no joke iam telling you ........ It mostly depends on person, but i have ptsd to this day from that interrogation, just because iam very emphatic person, who just couldn't believed, that somebody could accused me from harming anybody or commit armed robbery.
7 likesamazing observation! i saw this comment before watching and am glad to know to look out for this
0 likes@Pepsolman adrenaline works the opposite way.... it’s an immediate physiological defense to pain and shock that wears away over time. so technically, whether the adrenaline was from the incident and/or being interrogated, the pain would’ve worsened the longer he sat there. unless of course lying to the authorities kept fueling his adrenaline 😬
0 likes@ufiCz r/thathappened
0 likes😂😂😂
0 likesdelayed adrenaline
0 likesIt’s not unreasonable to ignore the pain when under interrogation. Adrenaline helps you ignore pain.
0 likes@Ryan Rose it's pretty understandable considering that it's a conversation that can rob you of your freedom
0 likes@CrazyMiles not the place for that dude
0 likesThe black dude shouldn’t have got violent tbh. Hot temper played a part in his demise. Wrong parts on both sides. Tough to make good decisions in the heat of the moment I’m sure.
1 likeY’all take 19 minutes to get to a dying person
1 likeThe whole my arm sore set up jus a big sign of his lack of ability to readdd the mfin roommm 😭😭
0 likesdrejka's problem was that he was attempting to play cop.....
0 likesif not him, it may have been someone else....
just imagine for a moment, that if there were a non disabled parking space..........
humanity suffers from a multitude of self inflicted failures.......
Investigator: Do you have any military training?
1471 likesSuspect: Yes Sir, I served on all the CALL OF DUTY games on all platforms and watched Police academy twice.
Replies (14)
THIS 👏🏻
11 likesWatched police academy all the way through
8 likesLol. Affirmative. 10-4. Over and out. 😆😆
5 likesFOHDY FIVE LAWNSLIDE WIT LAZUH SIGHTING
2 likesHe better be quiet about gta..)
1 like@John Do not go with him!
1 likePolice Academy 😂😂
1 likeTrained under Motor 1 himself sir
1 like@2 Brownish Girls 😂💀
1 likeLmao
1 likeAnd he is a 9 level prestige
1 like😂😂😂😂😂
1 like😂😂😂
1 likeOnly the last Police Academy though. Mission to Moscow.
1 likeWhat Michael did do to be pushed with that level of aggressiveness? I mean she did park in the handicap area. If that guy could push a man like this, why can't Michael self-defense?
1 likeYou were pushed in the back???…. No you were bushed on to your back big difference cowboy honest did he die in jail I need to know blatant disrespect for the life of another man
0 likesWhen he on the ground his arm don't hurt at all.. that's hilarious..
0 likes26:40 'just one shot, no reason to go overboard'
0 likesAt the point he had pulled his gun out and the other dude stepped back and took a more defensive body posture, I can't believe with good heart that the shooter still felt in danger. Even in moments of stress, when the counterpart starts acting defensively and backing up, this immediately registers with all your senses, consciously and unconsciously.
606 likesReplies (13)
He 100% thought "i should shoot him before he gets away" cause his ego was bruised and he didn't wanna miss his chance to kill someone for doing it.
123 likes@Mondester ABSOLUTELY
14 likes@Mondester I don't think so
3 likesThat’s the most disturbing moment for me.
3 likesThat black dude did assault him first but he had no right to shoot him like that! He wasn’t in any danger
10 likesI say, lucky the guy had a gun to defend himself from the black man, the aggressor.
4 likes@RAF Mag he was harassing his partner, the man should’ve reacted better and probably spoke rather than using violence but when ur seeing ur childs mother in a verbal conflict with a grown man you’re obviously gonna go full protector mode
8 likes@Mondester you 100% don’t know the full story.
0 likesI agree, he was backing up, thats when you get up, get in your car and leave. Him saying he needed to nuetralize the threat, the threat had been neutralized as soon as he pulled the gun. There was no reason to fire.
9 likes*subconsciously
0 likesThe guy went out to protect his family. This dummy is lucky that he only got a push instead of a knuckle sandwich!
2 likesHe sure as hell felt in danger, but only because this was a black man that had just hurt him and his ego. The racist undertones are hard to deny, he definitely felt threatened by this powered black man who he believes would kill him. I imagine it'll be a while before society kicks down racial stereotypes, especially with strong black men defending their families.
1 like@Tina Louise fr
0 likesthat man was NOT a threat to him. yes, he pushed him, but he was not going at him. this idiots ego was bruised, so he shot him
1 likeWe want more JCS
1 likeLet’s forget that the idiot is yelling at a lady for parking illegally while he is parked illegally as well. I can somewhat understand why he drew his weapon after being pushed to the ground. However, there was absolutely no reason for him to pull the trigger at that point, and he knew that. Once you pull that trigger in any situation, your life changes forever one way or the other.
5 likesReplies (1)
Drejka had pulled this shit on like 4 different occasions in just the last 5 years. He retired early because of wear and tear on his body and also because he had a decent inheritance left to him. Unfortunately he had no aim or purpose in his life. He was looking for a situation where he could create a conflict and then shoot someone in self defense, in some bizarre kind of hero fantasy he had. He wanted to be a cop or in the military but wasn't cut out for either. Being some heroic citizen that saves the day was the next best thing for him, only that scenario isn't so common to find yourself in, so he was trying to make one happen. He was a ticking timebomb.
2 likesI will never ever understand how bootlickers don't know better then to willingly speak to cops (after killing someone) or give them permission to do anything (like search a car)... like seriously... what are you thinking?
0 likesEven if I was 200% innocent I would know better then to do that!
UPDATE: On October 10, 2019, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit of 92 days for time served. He is imprisoned at Lancaster Correctional Institution, near Trenton, Florida, where he was attacked and reportedly wounded by another inmate on February 11, 2020
263 likesReplies (20)
That's so fucked up. The 'justice' system is corrupt.
10 likesHow? It wasn't murder in the aspect that he thought he was doing self defense. 20 years is an adequate sentence.
46 likesFrog he straight up killed someone that pushed him so hopefully he’ll get karma
41 likes@Frog Please explain what is fucked up about it.
11 likes@Frog are people not suppose to be punished for murder?
25 likes2/11 never remember
8 likes@Vincent its not about sadism, its about keeping him away from the public for our safety
9 likesGood, fake tough guys get exposed real quick in prison.
10 likes@Casey Not really. Those kids are going to miss out on their dad taking care and providing for them for their entire lives. He won't be at their weddings, he won't be coming home to play with them. The fact that the father lost his life over a parking space and the perpetrator only gets 20 years is an injustice. Couple that with the fact that Drejka threatened other people with a gun before this, not just once but multiple different people - he is a hazard to be on the street. This might have been prevented had anyone stopped him to begin with. But I suppose someone had to lose their life before this loser received time. The fact is, it was preventable, all of it. If he didn't agree with the woman parking in the space, he could have said something. But he lingered, raising it to a shouting match. Husband comes out, thinks someone is threatening the wife... the victim did what any husband would do, and tried to make the crazy man back off. Twenty years isn't enough, because those kids will now not have the finances to do better in life, because their father isn't there to provide for them.
9 likes@Let the No One meme die already I honestly think Frog meant that he should have been given more. The max was thirty years. I honestly felt, myself, that Drejka should have been given thirty years on account of how he threatened others with a weapon, and it culminated in him killing someone. So maybe I am reading what Frog said as being wrong, but I thought Frog wanted more time for Drejka.
9 likes@BlackSeranna if that's what he meant, I can agree to that but the comment was vague. At least he's been put away and his life ruined
1 like@BlackSeranna oh okay. Yeah that makes more sense
1 likeFrog is just trolling.
2 likesHe wasn't afraid of for his life by his own words just was playing out a script in his mind. He's Karen with a gun.
6 likes@BlackSeranna This is way too grammatically correct and valid of a point for a YouTube comment.
1 like@Frog id like to know if that other inmate felt 'threatened' and 'didnt want to go overboard'
1 likehe'll be out in 2 years
1 like@vaas d the point is no matter who started the fight, an innocent. man is dead for no reason. By 5he way., the victim did not start the fight.
3 likes😂😂😂😂
0 likesDrejka was struck repeatedly across the head by another inmate, who used a lock inside a sock as a weapon. He received head wounds which needed stitching back together.
4 likesThat’s why I am against guns!
0 likes'I know this store'
0 likesGets caught on the store cameras
He genuinely thought what he was doing right. He shouldn't have start a fight with the lady in the first place. It wasn't his job. But he ended up killing someone without believing he did something wrong. He should have never escalated the situation to the point of needing a gun. The poor kid who lost a father. I hope this man regrets shooting that gun.
2 likesI’m glad he’s off the streets
1 likeI love how everyone is collectively binge watching these videos so despite this video coming out well over a year ago the comments are really recent
707 likesReplies (15)
everyones interested, this and tiny house
7 likesIt shows up in recommended.
6 likesQuite
1 likeIkr, I love the fact that everyone got recommended the "pretending to be crazy" video
14 likesHis latest video was super popular
4 likesI am definitely one of those people. Watched like 7 videos in the last 3 days haha.
5 likesconfirmed
1 likeYou got me so good. These videos are addicting
1 likeits all with that damn fake guy video's fault
2 likesConsidering your comment is only a day old and already has a lot of upvotes, we both are not alone
3 likesMe: I'm not that easily influenced!
3 likesAlso me: Adds 3 more JCS videos to queue
@Dustin Bridges yea i have been seeing a lot of these this week
0 likes@Blake Sweeney me too
0 likesim only 2 videos away of watching all of them in just 3 days
1 likeWild, huh?
1 likeStuff like this is very common in Florida and Texas. People get kill for stupid reasons. I remember when some dude was killed for a parking spot
0 likesDid the car have that invaloid parking permit? IF you park in Inva-park without a permit, something like this will eventually happen, albeit not deadly incident each time necessarily. Also, when do they teach people to ask for lawyer? Oh, they do. Stupid and overaggressive, to the jail, please.
0 likes"Racial Overtones"? Is that asked in every and each time regardless of the races of the victim and the killer when they are not of same race, all directions?
What a lame defence.... "It's not HD or good colour so the CCtV isn't a good representation of what happened"
1 likeyou know he was just waiting for an excuse to use that gun 🤣
3 likesThis guy makes me think of Trevor of GTA
0 likesHe should have minded his effin business!
2 likesmannn i wish marquise ran... i bet he didnt think hed b getting shot
1 likeDo you mind if I call you Michael? You can call me George. George Michael 😂 I'll show myself out.
0 likesI’m a highschool psychology teachers assistant and your channel makes my job 100% easier and effortless haha. Whenever the professor calls sick or anything I just play one of your videos and assign worksheets correlating to your vids. Thank you a ton
265 likesReplies (18)
🍻
0 likesMr Torres please report to the office. Mr Torres
18 likesBro, you're a highschool psychology teachers assistant, your job is ALREADY 100% easy and effortless lmao! (Just fuckin with ya to get a laugh, I dont actually believe that)
10 likesYour class sounds like fun! Good job 👍
5 likesMr.Torres is that you ?
2 likesI don’t really like getting called “mr” so I doubt it tbh. I just have my students call me by name
3 likesSo you’re a glorified student aid
4 likes@PrfctPlyr why are you putting him down?
5 likes
4 likesSARAit was a joke relax. I forgot jokes are not tolerated.Not gonna lie, pretty much
2 likesBrandon Torres haha thanks for not being offended. Rare commodity on this internet thing.
2 likesI’m a full time paramedic. I only work 2 days a week, I choose to be a sub on my days off because it’s fun. So no, I’m not qualified for “fuck all”. I can tolerate banter but that’s disrespect.
8 likes@Brandon Torres Lol you should edit that to "substitute" instead of "sub"... might give the wrong impression ;) lmfao
0 likesSub in the school, dom in the sheets
11 likes😂✊🏻
0 likesI’m a substitute, Our jobs as subs is to loosely follow lesson plans and make sure the kids don’t murder eachother. You must be one extremely miserable person if you need to rage over a simple comment, hope everyone is going well at home 🙏🏽
4 likesGreat job...
1 like@Dr. Phil Good it's free content, no one is obliged to donate.
0 likesI don’t think Drejka could have had a worse lawyer.
0 likesthe parking lot was friggin empty at the beginning !!!
1 likemichael gives me r/niceguy vibes '-'
1 likeShould have just become a cop.. they get do do that shit without cause all the time
1 likeHe parked illegally to confront someone else parking illegally.
6831 likeslOgIc
Replies (88)
Karen type of "human"
117 likesKA- BOOM!!! Oh my god your way of thinking makes my iq drop... the only guy here in the wrong is the dude with the gun. Everyone with simple logic thinking understands this.
129 likesThe essence of a bully.
19 likesGrannvale Flame Emperor HIs "force-multiplier"😂Freudian overtones on that one there.
10 likesLike the parking Robin Hood.
10 likesKA- BOOM!!! He actually said he approached the vehicle while he was already walking to the store.
10 likes@KA- BOOM!!! You do know he pushed him non-lethally and backed up as the guy shot him, right? Pushing someone who is yelling at your wife and kids is grounds for death? You're not going to win this one...
66 likes@KA- BOOM!!! Also, the gunman has a history of pulling guns on people including on a mother in front of her kids...
19 likes@KA- BOOM!!! Pushing someone is not grounds for killing someone. It's literally that simple. You aren't convincing anybody. With every post you just show your ignorance.
26 likesyes, but the rest of us are perfect.
0 likesunlike the rest of us perfect people without a blemish.
0 likes@nogh Thangs Nobody said anyone was perfect... What are you even on about?...
9 likesSleeved Heathen That’s not what i’m saying? Is it ok to shoot someone dead because he pushed you because that guy was yelling at your girl? Totally! Makes sense! Haha!
8 likes@Lars van Zutphen I know what you mean. I tell my employees if there is a confrontation and you do not deescalate, you are the problem.
7 likes@KA- BOOM!!! I'm not okay with being pushed but I would never respond by murdering the person. Are you out of your mind?
11 likesthose of you defending the father's actions must have not watched the surveillance video, it's an obvious assault, I'd have done the same
1 like@GorillionDollarExtreme the father was in the wrong but that doesn't mean he should have been shot. And if you really would do the same and shoot someone over a shove, you should get 20 years too.
15 likes@Anthony Valenti nah, he just said too much.
0 likesPulling out the pistol was justified use of force, shooting after he stepped back was the issue that was looked at in court.
2 likes@KA- BOOM!!! then he shouldn't have a gun if he doesn't have the mental faculties to handle a gun responsibly. The guy murdered someone over a shove. He deserved to be put in prison. If you honestly think he's justified in murdering someone, you need to take a step back and examine why you would come to that conclusion. What in your head could possibly allow you to take this side?
11 likes@KA- BOOM!!! first off, I said he was in the wrong for shoving the guy, but he didn't deserve to be shot for it. 2nd, pulling it out was one thing, i would even understand brandishing it, but firing after the man backed away and not even giving so much as a warning is unacceptable. 3rd, let's take your same stupid logic and apply it to Markeis: he sees a man screaming at his wife and children. He gets a burst of adrenaline and can only think that his wife and children are in danger. So he pushes the aggressor. Why is that an excuse for the shooter and not Markeis? What about the shooting is justified in your eyes but not the shove? I don't believe either was in the right but clearly the man who takes another's life is worse. So what the hell is your justification?
9 likes@KA- BOOM!!! Shooting someone for shoving you is not justified. ( for some reason you think you can just shoot people for a shove, weird flex but ok).
7 likes@KA- BOOM!!! couldn't tell? Yeah maybe he should have took a split second to check before killing him. Or maybe brandish the weapon, make it known he'd shoot if Markeis continued the assault and then make a judgment call on whether he is still a threat? 99.9999% of times, just showing the gun is enough.
3 likes@KA- BOOM!!! great bodily harm? He was fine, other than a scuff on his arm as he said in the interrogation. Markeis is DEAD. No longer among the living.
8 likes@KA- BOOM!!! and of course he was justified; that's why he was found innoce... oh wait..... he was charged with manslaughter and got 20 years.... huh.
6 likesThere is no logic in the mind of a WS
3 likes@KA- BOOM!!! he had a lawyer lol
1 likeHe had 2 lawyers actually lol. "Drejka was represented by criminal defense attorneys John Trevena and Bryant Camareno." -wiki.
4 likes@KA- BOOM!!! @KA- BOOM!!! again both are in the wrong but Markeis DIDN'T SHOOT ANYONE. Any rational person should expect more restraint from a person holding a weapon that can end a life in an instant. Again, you seem to be not able to understand the difference in consequences between pushing someone and shooting someone. Also, unless you have a death wish, if someone pulls a gun on you, you stop messing with them. I can't think of any situation where any half functioning human being would continue an assault on someone who just pulled out a gun.
4 likesAnd also now you're just making shit up. Drejka had 2 lawyers and Markeis did not punch him. Did you even watch the video? You've resorted to lying at this point lol. Listen, we all know why you really think Drejka was justified in shooting Markeis; you can stop pretending now...
@KA- BOOM!!! Yes I am. I never said i was different. I don't drink because it makes it a problem for me so you are right. Doesn't mean my reasoning is wrong, it just means i am flawed in the same way.
3 likesThis is 'MERICA pew pew
1 like@KA- BOOM!!! meanwhile, in reality, more Americans have renounced their citizenship this year than any prior year. The Americans who CAN get away are. God bless America.
6 likes@Grannvale Flame Emperor 👆 Truth.
0 likes@KA- BOOM!!! Jesus Christ O.e
0 likesLars van Zutphen yes! I’m thinking maybe he saw it as his chance to shoot a black man since he initiated the physical altercation. He had no right to pull his gun and kill a man over getting pushed! This pisses me off
4 likesCops do this. He thought he was a cop.
1 likemake it make sense
0 likesKA- BOOM!!! He was not facing an immediate threat to his life by being pushed down lol. This guy 100% looked for yet another opportunity to abuse his second amendment right after he had a history of threatening women and children with his firearm in the past. Should have been taken away from him a long time ago. Idc what the other people in the handicap spot were doing, they were not trying to take his life, he felt safe going after those people because he had a gun and wasn’t afraid to use and abuse it. Period.
6 likesKA- BOOM!!! i hope he texts you back
2 likesYou strike first, be prepared to go down!
0 likes@KA- BOOM!!! You would never make a great detective. You are assuming intention and many other things. You have no idea what this man's intentions were. And, that he "illegally parked" himself definitely shows his "principles" are subpart at best. Whether he was parking his car to curse her out and then go park again or not he still was chastising someone for doing the very thing that he had just done. That my friend is called: hypocrisy -- no matter how you slice the cake. You seem hell bent on trying to justify this man's actions in some way or another I. You're more concerned with someone parking in a handicap space at a store with multiple parking spots available than someone shooting another person at point blank range simply because they got pushed to the ground. Yes, it was assault. Yes, the boyfriend should not have come out and pushed him. But, we are never justified in fighting pushes with bullets.
2 likes@Hybrid Ronin I believe that is precisely the issue. He's a racist person and therefore cannot see the humanity of the black man. If this were two white people in the same scenario I truly doubt he would be in this comment sectionbbeing so defensive of a murderer. People shove, hit and get into physical altercations all the time. Even brothers and sisters get into fist fights. But, normally we don't grab a gun and shoot the person afterwards. If they shove us then we generally shove them back. He understands this but he cannot see the humanity of the African-American man and thus, regardless of whatever, he will find a way to justify the white man's actions. Racism is wrong and murder is wrong. I believe these two facts elude Mr/Mrs. Kaboom.
6 likesIkr. He parked illegally next to someone parked illegally to confront them about their illegal parking and then shot someone for pushing him over even though there was no evident threat of serious harm to him or threat to his life after he was pushed.. Did we just witness a male Karen?
2 likes@Grannvale Flame Emperor na he would,he wanted to use that gun
0 likes@KA- BOOM!!! it was justifiable to pull out the gun, not to fire it.
0 likes@Sleeved Heathen if that person is harrassing your wife and children, then yeah, it may be justified to shove a person away. What's not legal is shooting someone dead just because they shoved you.
2 likes@KA- BOOM!!! Not from a legal perspective it isn't, that's why the shooter is in jail. You know what I think? I think if the races were reversed in this case, and a white man walked out of a store and saw a black man harrassing his wife and children, and shoved that man, and then got shot to death while retreating, you'd be calling the white guy a hero for protecting his wife and children, and the black guy a violent thug.
3 likes@KA- BOOM!!! you just keep telling yourself that, your comments say otherwise.
1 likeLogic 101🤣
0 likes@KA- BOOM!!!
0 likesYou're right, Drejka didn't have a lawyer...he had two. Three if you count the one who was dismissed from the case early on.
"The conviction came after 6½ hours of deliberations by the jury of five men and one woman. It was read aloud at 10:41 p.m. Drejka stared straight ahead, standing beside his lawyers. He could face up to 30 years in prison."
It's hard to tell if you're deliberately lying about this case, or if you're genuinely ignorant.
KA- BOOM!!! Quick thing here. Taking the mans history of brandishing his weapon when there is no threat on his life out of the equation, if you watch the video there IS a second that the man with the gun takes before he shoots. I’d say it’s more like 2. In that time the other guy clearly has his hands up and is backing away. The father is also far enough away once he’s on the ground to give him plenty of time to pull his gun AND get into a kneeling position. The man shot him in cold blood. Shoved or not. It’s cold blood. Now if you take his history of blatantly waving his gun around as a power play whenever he damn well felt like it into consideration as well, he is very clearly not aware of the responsibility of having a gun. And being shoved, while it can count as assault, especially since he fell over, is not valid as a life threatening situation. This man should be in jail and should not have access to fire arms. He started the altercation, and while he didn’t start the physical aspect of it, he went in looking for a fight and a way to swing his dick around. The ultimate truth of the matter is that this man is looking for any reason to use his gun. Any. And his mind will create scenarios to make it justified as you can tell when he says the woman was not a threat to himself “anymore”..... from a psychological perspective.
4 likes@KA- BOOM!!! you're literally lying about lying now lol. You said if the shooter had a lawyer instead of representing himself. You're not even good at lying.
2 likes@KA- BOOM!!! except I'm not what did I lie about
0 likes@KA- BOOM!!! Had Michael not had a firearm, he never would've approached the car to begin with. This is evidenced from his history.
2 likesBut, let's play this out. He accosts the car occupant. The parking offense probably isn't worth getting that worked up over, but sometimes you just gotta vent, OK. Boyfriend/husband comes up and pushes him. Definitely assault, but potentially could've been reduced in court due to circumstances (was concerned for his partner). Michael instantly draws his weapon. Definitely justified, as conceded by both sides at his trial--blindsided and very easily in fear of bodily harm. Victim sees the gun and instantly backs up. One Mississippi two Mississippi three. Not a long time, but an eternity to see a guy react to your aggressive defense and back up. Unless you never considered the mere threat of a gun could stop anyone and needing to draw equates to always needing to fire. That's where Michael screwed up and a jury of his peers called him out on it.
@KA- BOOM!!! he literally says he was justified in pulling out the gun BUT was not justified in shooting
0 likes@KA- BOOM!!! literally watch 46:35 onward dude + 48:54
0 likes@SARAI Dawta of ISRAEL Of course right you are, that is why he got 20 years obviously because he is white and privileged.
0 likes@xc WotRS Love playing the racist card. Nothing intelligent to add to the discussion just the one liner that is used over and over and over oh did I mention over again ? When all else fails always keep that card in your pocket and pull it out every chance you can . Please. Keep it alive. Whether or not racism plays or doesn't play a factor in the situation, doesn't matter , by god use it anyway . It never gets old and seems to apply to every situation. Unbelievable mind numbing. Don't use this line sparingly. Keep it front and center Again, even if it doesn't apply keep adding it. Thank you for adding deep intellectual dialog . Keep it up, it helps so much.
1 like@orX a what about the woman that parked in a handicap spot? Coming from a disabled individual I find it infuriating when others that do not need the spot somehow justify their entitlement to do anyways. Simple fact when people park in a handicap spot and don't need it is just plain lazy. Ì most definitely say something as well. Not a Karen but if you had a loved one that needs this spot because they have cancer, 😜😜😜
1 likeThe big difference here was someone was illegally using a space intended for someone with a disability. Why? These type only think of themselves and pure laziness. Again, against the law if you do not have a placard or license plate indicating you may park there. The other vehicle involved may have been a inconvenience to some but was not illegal. Huge difference between the two. Not once has anyone stated how these folks must feel entitled to park illegally because it is convenient for them. I also at every chance I get let people know that it is illegal and she is showing her kids a fine example of what not to do.
1 like@Brea Devlin whooosh
2 likesWell he was authorized duhhh, didnt you listen? It was HIS market
1 likeGuy lives "right around the corner" and still drives to the market? Stupid in every way.
1 likeHow did he park illegally
0 likes@Sophia Troanska Well his car was left in the middle of the parking lot. Not in a parking spot.
0 likes@✿MJF✿ looked like a parking spot to me 🤷🏽♀️
0 likes@Sleeved Heathen it’s not, but should that equal death?
0 likes@GorillionDollarExtreme you would have killed a man after he pushed you bc you started a confrontation w/ his wife?
0 likes@Jordan Darrell that’s a really broad generalization. There are bad cops, bc they’re people. There are bad ppl like this guy...
0 likes@Jeremy Caulk 1 he shouldn't have attacked him 2 he didnt know who started what 3 dude had no idea what might happen next and just tried to defend himself asap
0 likesThey were both in the wrong and yeah, when a 1m90 black guy push me to the ground almost breaking my arm, I will defend myself.
0 likes@Antonio Montana 😂
0 likesI actually see that more than once
0 likes@Lars van Zutphen it was literally self defense he was put on the ground
0 likesEXACTLY!!
0 likes@Brea Devlin are you for real? You're comment is all about the parking spot and how infuriating it is to see someone with out a handicap. So it's ok to shoot someone over it? I don't understand your whining in the comments while the man was shot. That what was infuriating to you? Lol gtfoh
3 likesWas he in a illegal spot? I couldn’t see
0 likesYou cannot park illegally on private property. You can trespass or commit other crimes but the laws of the road do not apply on private property.
1 likeOtherwise how could we have racetracks?
american parking makes no sense
0 likesmotive
0 likesKilling someone when they are trying to kill you is legal.
0 likes*Logic.
@Lars van Zutphen y Opo
0 likeshe did not. delete your comment.
0 likes@Anthony Valenti it's funny how you ignore the fact that all of this would have been avoided if he didn't push the guy
0 likes@DBZ BT4 Gameplay it's funny how you ignore the several times I said the guy was in the wrong for pushing him yet that doesn't warrant shooting him. Learn to read.
1 likeEdit: it's even funnier that you are ignoring the fact the guy was harassing the dude's family and had a history of making threats to shoot people before. Funny how you left all that out.
@Anthony Valenti because they started it 🤦♀️ why would you want me to include something that proves my point and if you really understand the guy was in the wrong for pushing him then you would have known consequences come with that
0 likes@Sleeved Heathen you actually think the man pushing him ks wrong ? He protected his wife n kids.
0 likesThe dead guy had a right!
@Lars van Zutphen I agree, only people who are simply think the guy with the gun is at fault here.
0 likesIs he leading the jury?
0 likes20 minutes to respond to a gunshot wound????????
1 likeThat defense was pathetic
1 likeTherapist: Male Karen doesn’t, exist he can’t hurt you.
0 likesMale Karen:
This dude had pulled his pistol on 4 other people prior?? It sounds like he just wants a reason to use it
3606 likesReplies (55)
Exactly
60 likesYou can tell by how practiced and confident his language was during the interrogation that he'd been fantasizing and preparing for something like this. The fact that he had multiple run-ins where he was the antagonist further suggests that this was a man who had a gun and was looking to use it.
249 likesStill I guess it's not a good idea to push shove someone to the ground just because you're younger and bigger and you can.
39 likesTake a walk in a ghetto somewhere, preferably at night, being pushed violently on the ground from behind and then sit there and wait to be more violated.
5 likes@Chad K Right. I understand what you are saying. This is not quite the same as some of the other cases you mentioned. On the video it looks as if the decedent was backing away at the sight of the gun. I think the decision to fire had already been made it just hadn't gone from brain to finger. Im not so much defending the shooting as pointing out that the criminal conduct of th decedent in initiating the use of force and violence was a key factor even if it doesn't fully justify the shooting. At the end of the day, he'd still be alive if he wasn't so aggressive and quick to violence.
8 likes@Chad K I don't know about other cases, all I'm looking at is this case. If there were prior incidents where he inappropriately pulled a gun, which is a use of non deadly force, why wasn't he prosecuted? If he was, he should have lost his carry permit? He never should have made that statement to police, he definitely should have invoked his right to an attorney and said nothing. I think in his mind the decedent was closing on him even though the video doesn't show that. The left turn all kinds of legitimate uses of self defense into media fiascos so this is nothing new.
5 likes@Neil Siebenthal He wasn't breaking any law in being nosey about their parking violation. Like i said, the decedent would be alive if he told drejka to shut up and drove off. Yes they could spend the entire car ride home demeaning white people for not minding their business and caring about trivial parking laws. This is the United States of America, outside of threats or a direct incitement to violence, you can say what you want, even if people think it's not your business or think it's dumb...violence in response to speech you think is annoying or dumb isn't appropriate. Besides, although he had the right to say what he said, he couldn't compel them to listen. They were free to drive off without hinderense, had he attempted to prevent that, the use of force would have been appropriate.
11 likes@James W Stop defending racist murderers. How about that.
85 likes@Neil Siebenthal defending in a cowardly sneak attack, but died a hero's death anyhow. They both earned their outcomes.
6 likesYea, he couldn't find one so he pressed it.
0 likes@c ss I agree, talk to a lawyer. Plenty of time to talk to police later.
2 likeshow do we know? There is a video of it.
How do we know the other times? Common sense.
Yea, UK needs a massive reformation over there. Ban guns, stabbings go up. Ban knives, clubbings go up. Ban clubs, strangulation goes up.
Guns get it as close to a fair fight as it can get.
@James W And, at which point does any of that justify anyone to pull a glock, take his time, aim, and shoot, AT A MAN ALREADY RETREATING?
29 likes@James W "I'm not so much defending the shooting as..." "He'd still be alive if..." That means in some form, you are defending the shooting, while simultaneously blaming the victim.
35 likes"...even if it doesn't fully justify the shooting." So there's partial justification in your mind for this shooting?
No. There was no justification here, as was legally decided. What are you smoking?
"The left turn all kinds of legitimate uses of self defense into media fiascos."
"They could spend the entire car ride home demeaning white people."
Ah, so you're paranoid about liberals. That would explain the cognitive dissonance.
@James W if you cant handle getting pushed after YOU start an argument with someones woman, maybe dont carry a gun or idk maybe dont start shit?
23 likes@Yannis Martynov The fact that this was a violent encounter initiated by the "victim". When someone is suddenly and deliberately attacked from behind, something no descent self respecting human would do...
2 likesThis is not a situation where you can sit down and aynaliticlly weigh the factor for and against danger from the attacker and the pros and cons of taking immediate action. Human instincts evolved not for use in the courtroom but for survivalival in nature.
What happens in a case like this is that the decision to shoot had already been made before he began to back off, so him backing off had nothing to do with the decision to shoot, there is just a slight delay as your subconscious mind tells your conscious mind you need to shoot, messages between neurons travel fast but not instantly as your brain as the thoughts travel to all centers of the brain necessary to complete the task, then it again takes time for the message to shoot moves to the muscles in your hand to actually do it, all this takes some time, it may be a second or less but it's enough time for the circumstances to change somewhat, but the call had already been made.
@James W Look. We can debate here, for an eternity, on wether this was some extraordinary situation, or how he was pushed, or no,t, but, it will be looping around, avoiding the main question, me, and several others asked. How does any of that justify cold blooded murder, with the time luxury to properly aim, before firing, more specifically. Havin your opinions, and beliefs, and agenda, is all fine and respected, but, using that to excuse something that's, frankly, beyond reasonable excuse, is best left to defense attorneys, in courtrooms, not youtube comments, because, the only "gain" of this , will be giving everyone the opinion that you use politicalbias to excuse murder. And, that, is not good.
9 likes@Fenix Nobody is arguing that the victim also wasn't an asshole for shoving him in the first place. Why bring it up?
2 likes4 times sounds like a lot. It doesn't when you know he's been carrying for 24 years.
0 likes@James W Dude just pushed him he didnt pounced or anything he pulled a gun over a handicapped spot and opened fire for no reason . When some random dude screams at your girlfriend cause i doubt you are old enought to have a wife do you walk away?
4 likesYep. A powerless 'man' who only felt powerful wielding a gun.
2 likesThat’s what I was thinking
0 likes@Bani Mil ????????
0 likes@Fenix dont try to justify it. hes been itching to use his gun since the day he bought it, just like most of the gun owning community in the south were hes from.
5 likes@Iain Bailey deadly weapons like guns should be only for cops and army, nothing else...
2 likes@Iain Bailey nah, look what's people do with fire arms, lmfao it doesn't make sense to have one
1 like@Iain Bailey he knows more than you, obviously.
0 likes@Bijyo one, he may be mistaken in the heat of the moment doesn't mean it was a lie (lie is telling something you know not to be true, with the intent to deceive), second, whether he was yelling or not, any justification to push him went out the windows when SHE GOT OUT OF THE VEHICLE and closed the distance between them. The shove was assault (or battery) and could be prosecuted, the others actions don't justify it. The man was approaching him on the ground, the drawing of the gun was also justified. He noticed and started to move away, the SHOT was not justified. Lastly, he was charged and found guilty of manslaughter (agreed, good verdict) not murder. The shot was 100% NOT JUSTIFIED, however, the push was 100% not justified. as for yelling, as long as you are not threatening, and you are yelling at each other, it isn't illegal to tell someone what you think of them breaking the law....having said that, his history would suggest he was doing so with the intent to find an opportunity, and THAT is not justifiable either.
4 likes@antzielioXD you certainly don't attack the man. well, maybe YOU would but any normal human being with common sense wouldn't.
2 likes@James W Your whole argument is void for simple fact that the victim would not have been had the murderer just did one simple..mind his business or maybe even call the police non emergency line. Most men heck people would react the same say if someone was threatening your family the guy was in enough distance to pull his fireame and kills how girlfriend..you defend Michael for wanting defend his self but blame the victim for doing the same thing for his family. Think about what you are saying
1 like@Kellen Wheeler No, most people are not that aggressive, not that quick to violence. I get it, this is the new dynamic, if someone mouths off, you can attack them. Again they could have flipped him off, left and spent the entire ride home complaining about white people not minding their own business and caring about stupid things like parking...they are going to park wherever they want. If they had done that, he'd be alive. Watch who you go shoving.
2 likes@Fenix funny how nobody seems to ask the question, what would've happened if he doesn't have a gun? The shooting was not justified but let's entertain that hypothetical situation.
1 like@MoahGentle not much, even before the gun, it doesn't look like the victime had any intention of further aggressing the shooter.
0 likesPlus it is broad daylight and there are clearly plenty of people around that could have come to help him if he'd actually been beaten up
@James W he did it because he saw this individual was yelling through the driver window at the mother of his children. Don't sit there and say "he did it because he could"
1 like@Bobby Sells from what we do know, she was almost certainly shouting back at him too. I don't know where you guys live but the entire world isn't Harlem, outside of the hood you can't attack and use violence against anyone you perceive as having disrespected you or your girl in any way. Enough with this silly macho man I'm a badass chest banging, if we all lived like that we'd scarcely go 15 minutes without seeing a brawl in the street. This is not the rec-yard at the penitentiary.
2 likesHe carries it around waiting for a reason to shoot someone no doubt in my mind
2 likes@Bigboikilljoy Too bad someone gave him the opportunity
2 likes4 minorities*
0 likes@James W not a good idea to have an altercation with a woman with children in a car without taking in account that you could stumble upon the man and be pushed by him cos he might feel something bad in your attitude towards the family.
0 likes@JH vibes thank you man!!! He is yelling at a woman and kids and simply gets pushed. Come on man
0 likesGood
0 likes@K. A. Benitez I mean, all cases of use of a firearm in self defense are treated like this, so most gun owners will watch videos or go to classes to understand where/when they are legally allowed to carry, what the circumstances are for when it's legal to draw, and when to make the decision to pull the trigger and what to do following such an occurrence. I don't necessarily see it as a red flag that he knew the terminology, at least aside from other evidence. Having drawn 4 times previously, it does make it more damning. Despite all this, he still didn't say the right things
0 likes@Fenix I think it's much more complicated than that, how would you feel if a guy was at the window if your car yelling at your wife while your kid was also in there? I'd be furious. Then if I was pushed from behind, I'd def be afraid that it would continue while I was on the ground
0 likes@James W this is officially the dumbest take I've seen on this case
0 likes@James W yes she probably was shouting. a strange man is approaching and circling her car, why would she not? He initiated the situation, before further escalating it by pulling out a deadly weapon. He was the threat, and what do people do when they feel threatened?
0 likes@Yaya G. You could say he was being annoying, but it's not against the law to walk around someone's car, it's not against the law to be annoying, it's not against the law to be overly zealous in wanting traffic/parking laws to be enforced. He hasn't done anything that indicated he was a threat to actually physically harm anyone. The is not the rec yard at the penitentiary, you can't attack someone simply for being annoying or bothering your girl.
0 likesSo he would have had to said a verbal threats or said something that amounts to an incitment to violence. I'd let's say the man was shouting derogatory racist dribble at them, you could argue that would be a incitment to violence, it's something that could cause an otherwise rational person to became so enraged that it's a provocation. We don't have that here, we have a guy being nosey about how their car was parked. You probably have mutual shouting on both sides,
The gun: so yeah it's easy for us to sit back and watch the video and critique what happened and what would have been the better options. Things aren't so simple or cut and dry in the moment. When you are attacked like that your body releases a rush of adrenaline and the fight or flight response takes over and it's almost a totally automated response. Throughout most of human evolution the world was often a very hostile places, there were no police or judges to sit in judgment of a violent encounter. If upon attack you strike hard and fast, you are going to have a better chance to walk away front the incident, every moment you delay makes it more likely you don't walk away alive. This is just the reality of the situation.
@Yaya G. Why is it dumb to point out that the use of violence to teach someone who was being annoying a lesson isn't appropriate or legal?
0 likes@James W actually what he was doing could very well be elevated to a crime. Its called harrassment, and she had every right to tell him off, or to even call the cops. Once he saw that she wasn't moving, he should have left. But instead, he decides to stay there and shout at her. Now he's a threat. And as I said, we know what people do when they feel threatened.
0 likes@James W also he was only pushed, which is to be expected when your shouting at someone. Again, the blame comes back to him for initiating the shouting and making himself a threat.
0 likes@Yaya G. we don't know who started shouting or precisely what was said. We would just be speculating. The most rational series of events was probably that: he was seen walking around the car, she knew they were illegal parked and she wanted to know what he was going to do about it, if he was a cop etc. If he started the verbal exchange it would have most likely been a remark about their illegal park job. Yes I know, why would anyone care? They could have flipped him off, told him to eat shyt and mind his own business. They could have spent the entire car ride home complaining about white people for caring about dumb parking laws. Except that's not what happened. We had a guy mistake the free world for the prison rec yard where it's expected that you attack anyone who slights you in any way or you lose respect or however their prison rules work. The difference is, you can be pretty sure in the rec yard that the person who looked at you the wrong way won't pull a gun on you when you go to knock him out. If they are armed it's usually going to be small jabbing or slicing blades. It not common for them to carry a 9mm.
0 likesRegardless of who's fault you think it is, or who is more to blame in this situation, the man is still dead. Had he not been so hyper-aggressive he'd almost certainly be alive. You could probably get away with shoving 99% of people without getting killed in retaliation, he picked the wrong guy on the wrong day.
@Yaya G. There is no crime in Florida called "harassment". Even in a states that have such laws, I don't think anyone would consider just telling someone they did something illegal would constitute harassment. It's not against the law to not mind your own business. You just wouldn't have enough time in this case to approach that. Harassment would be an ongoing course of conduct.
0 likesFor example in a state that does have such laws: If they had got in the car and drive off and he followed them all the way home, blaring his horn and shouting at them and anyone who could hear about their illegal parking.
Surely they should have removed his permit to carry a gun because of this!? Gun laws in America are crazy
0 likes@Fenix he should have fired a warning shot.
0 likes@B leck nope- it was 2012 to 2014 and all pulled on other drivers.. as if it matters, you think everyone who has a gun more than 23 years will inevitably pull it on a pregnant woman and her children in he car while driving? Or 20 years? How long have you had your gun? Have you done it yet?
0 likes@James W She parked in handicapped spot, not innocent.
0 likes@Phyllis Irwin what do you mean?
0 likesHe whole demeanour changes after he’s told about the possible video
0 likesHow many times they gunna ask him the same question holy fuck
0 likesImagine getting murdered for a fucking parking spot
0 likesI bet she never park in a handicap parking spot ever again
3 likesThis goes completely against the whole idea of self defense. He just straight up wanted to shoot someone
621 likesReplies (19)
He didn’t pull it out until he hit him on the ground
1 like@MarquiseTheFirst his life wasn’t in danger. If he was pushed down and started to get beaten, it would have been justified. But the fact that he backs away after the gun is drawn just shows that this was excusable homicide...
59 likes@Z_ROck Inexcusable, I think you mean
31 likes@Z_ROck Someone else who knows exactly what they're talking about. Hallelujah!
4 likesTrue story
0 likesDude was blindsided and taken off his feet. Could have yelled as soon as he saw what was happening. But nah, quietly crept up on him.The shooting wasn't self defense but the victim wanted to be a tough guy and paid the price. Your life is more valuable than some posturing.
0 likes@YouJustAmazeMe Yes however he shot him after he was clearly moving back, if someone is moving back they are not a threat to your life (for the most part) looking at his body language once the gun came out he was in a submissive and in flight mode. I’m sure you have made mistakes in your life, the victim did as well, but does that mean you need to die for it?
13 likes@Gvistic Read my comment again. I said the shooting wasn't in self defense. The rest of your comment has nothing to do with anything I said. All you did was describe the video. Which by the way, I watched too.
0 likes@YouJustAmazeMe The part of your comment that warranted my response, was that "he paid the price" so he paid the price of death for trying to protect his family?
10 likes@Gvistic this is the last time I will respond to you, because your reading comprehension is not my responsibility. He "paid the price" for posturing as a tough guy. Again, he could have yelled at the man as soon as he saw what was happening. Telling a freak to get away from your family IS defending them, and from there he can assess the situation and decide how to handle it. Stop painting it black and white like he didn't have more wise and careful decisions available to him.
3 likes@YouJustAmazeMe All I'm saying, just because he was acting a tough guy shouldn't mean death, that's just my opinion.
8 likes@YouJustAmazeMe U know when u say "He "paid the price" for posturing as a tough guy" ur pretty much justifying someone shoting him even if ur saying its not self defence. Sure you could say his actions where bad, but nowhere bad enough to say he deserved death. I think even if he started kicking him and shit, it wouldnt warrant killing him becuse that would still be a massive excessive force becuse you know there is alot better ways to break up a figth that doesnt result in shooting someone.
8 likes@Andor if he did in fact start moving towards Drejka that would be enough of a ground for a pretty simple defense to get him out of it. If person1, having no opportunity to disengage, demonstrates lethal intent by pulling out a gun and explicitly warning person2 about that intent, they expect the other side to act accordingly to that knowledge, and if person2 reacts to it by closing the distance, it's safe to assume for person1 that person2 has acknowledged the lethal outcome of the situation and has something they could respond with, likely on a lethal / great bodily harm level. However, if person2 is demonstrating any signs of disengagement, all the easy self defense routes are off the table. Had Drejka not told the policemen that he wouldn't have a reason to shoot if Markeis hadn't continued the approach, maybe a good defense attorney could figure out a line, I'll take JCS's word on that. But the fact there was no warning and the victim was retreating put the final nail in the coffin, not that he would "only" get beaten the shit out of. Physical assault is a serious threat to your autonomy and shouldn't be taken lightly if you agree with your right to defend yourself, so if you could prove you perceived no realistic ways to escape, you're justified in showing a gun and demonstrating and voicing your lethal intent, and carrying through with it in case the assault continues. You should study the laws in your specific state in case they differ in any way though before you practice anything of what I said, I'm in no way qualified to make any suggestions, just basing what I'm saying off of some prior cases and the rights you're supposed to have on paper.
2 likes@Andor I don't think he said he "deserved" to die. But the guy did "pay the price" for acting though... Meaning that him getting shot was a direct consequence of that. Not that he deserved. Not that it was justified. But it was the price paid.
0 likes@Pig Parade You are right, in the end all that matters is that a family lost a loved one without a reason... But even so, I think it is important to reflect about the behavior of the guy that pushed, if only so that you wouldnt do something like that, because it could be avoided if he acted differently.
0 likesEdit: I am not in anyway whatsoever justifying the behavior of the guy that shot, just to be clear.
@Z_ROck yeah. There is that long pause after the draw where the decedent steps back and angles his body away. Hands visible. It is a bad shooting, meaning unjustified.
0 likes@YouJustAmazeMe or here's an idea; if you mind your business and let people deal with their own choices maybe you won't get pushed for not staying out of other people's business.
1 like@Z_ROck if he shot him 2 seconds earlier this wpuld have been justified. The moment he paused and realized the threat was over was where he made his mistake
0 likesSo shooting someone after they violently attack you goes against the whole notion of self defense?
1 likeExplain to me how that works exactly?
that was an ego shot
0 likesI HOPE HE IS IN PRISON TOSSING SALADS EVERYDAY. AND AFTER THAT ATTENDING MANY MANDINGO PARTIES.
2 likesWonder if the gf got the fine for illegally parking in a handicapped spot? Orrrr why was this great dad on ecstasy? Less then 5 seconds all that happened wise ones, and before the guy who got shot saw that a weapon was being pulled he was hovering a few feet from the guy. The guy reacted. I wonder what would have happened if he didnt have a gun. Oh wait ive seen what happens when someone gets blindsided unarmed the aftermath isnt pretty. And it wasnt defended as a stand ur ground case.
0 likes4:05 damn those handshakes make me cringe
1 likeCop: “I saw the video and he did not take a step toward you. He was moving back”
653 likesPOS: “I would disagree”
Cop: “Sir...I’m not sure you understand...it’s a video. Disagreement is actually not one of your options”
Replies (21)
nO If I dEnY iT tHAn IT's NoT TRue!!!!!
16 likesAlso 69 likes nice
3 likesWorking security, I had a guy accuse me of faking video. Criminals gonna crime, man. Logic be damned.
14 likesHe did take steps towards him. Watch the video. The assaulter violently shoves, approaches, sees the gun being pulled, then backs up. Within less than 3 seconds the old guy who was violently shoved to the pavement had to recognize that he no longer needed to fire at the assailant who was backing away. He didn't recognize, so now he is in jail for 20yrs.
2 likes@KuhEssen There were 3 seconds of time after he pulled the gun out and was pointing it at the man who was actively backing away.
9 likes@KuhEssen He was not moving towards him after he pulled out the gun but he says he did. He is either misremembering or simply lying. It's also pretty hard to believe he did not "recognize" that his gun was no longer needed.
3 likesWhen you pull out a gun and somebody walks away from you there is simply no reason to think you have to shoot. He had enough time to asses the situation and at that point nothing was threatening him. He had the upper hand and used it to retaliate for beeing pushed.
@KuhEssen first, marquis wasn’t the assaulter. He was getting a man away from his wife using non deadly force. He pushed him away and that was that he didn’t try and attack him or anything. Drejka then shoots at a man who is walking away from him—drejka knows damn well marquis wouldn’t have killed him if he didn’t shoot your comment Is ridiculous
3 likes@KuhEssen drejka is the start of the confrontation point blank. Why start an argument with a woman who has children in her car? The empty spots in the front of the store would have been easily accessible to a handicap person as they are usually in front. He had no reason to police where someone parked it wasn’t his business and if he was that concerned he coulda called the cops. You’re defending someone who quite clearly has been waiting for this opportunity
6 likes@Boarmans world Most of these responses to my comments are disagreements about whether he had time to react and decide he did not need to shoot after being violently shoved to the pavement in his old age and being approached as a follow up. Even the prosecution concedes the threat justified pulling his gun. Until people backed away, the threat justified firing the gun too. With perfect information maybe the shooter would have used restraint to preserve life. I could say the same thing about the assailant who violently shoved him to the pavement. Being shoved off balance like that into the pavement can end your life. Also, this is tangential, but the assailant's kids were in the store not the car.
0 likes@Boarmans world indeed
0 likes@KuhEssen well if guns were forbidden in the us this wouldn’t have happened
1 like@KuhEssen in the first minute of the video, up to 1:07 or so, it is very clearly stated that marquis had 3 children, all under 6, in the car, and that he took only his 5 year old son in to the store. The other two children are not mentioned as having gone in to the store, and as such can safely be presumed to be still in the car.
2 likes"in the passenger seat was her 28 year old boyfriend Marquis McLaughlin, while in the backseat were their three children, who were all under the age of six at the time. When they got to the store Brittany parked the vehicle in the stores only handicapped parking space located on the side of the building. Marquis then got out and went into the store with their five-year-old son[...]"
@Sasha Valeria Ah that is true. I recalled the guy died in front of his kid in the store, but there were others in the car too.
0 likes@Robert Sorry guy, but that was a lot of red herring. I am just going off the facts of the case. I agree that if he decided to shoot to kill a retreating assailant, then he was in the wrong. I am not confident that he decided that since he was probably disoriented, but could be! I am still surprised by the verdict, except for that the shooter had a big mouth an incriminated himself.
0 likes@KuhEssen I get your point, however 2 of his kids were in the back of the car, stated at the beginning
0 likes@Jordon Houston Would I be okay with being shot? I don't think it is about being okay with that. It is about whether it was justified and reasonable. I would not violently sucker-punch-style shove an old guy into the pavement without saying a word to him. If I did, I would go to jail.
0 likesVideo CAN be misleading, but clearly not the case here.
1 likeThe guy was innocents, and a hero. Check your priveledge white girl.
0 likes@himynameistim Check your spelling first <3
0 likes@MB Smith I refuse to use the spell chacker.
0 likes@KuhEssen A sucker punch is a punch, intended to do damage. A shove is intended to create distance. If someone was having a heated argument and was directing aggression towards your family, I'd say you would be justified in shoving someone away. Deadly force is not the appropriate response to a shove.
0 likesmaybe america should just ban guns🤷🏽♀️
0 likesReasons why everyone shouldn’t just be carrying guns around thinking they can use it for self defense.
0 likesYou can tell he was hard the entire time
0 likesWhy can't people just mind their business ppl pop in and out of the store. Don't let ego get you locked up for life.
0 likesA little pib squeak, that a glock 43 is too heavy to hold with one hand, shouldn’t even be allowed to own a gun. Let alone shoot it
0 likesa major issue in this country is that ppl equate self defense to shooting at first confrontation. it should always be a last ditch resort.
0 likesDid he ever feels sorry about kids father whom he killed for nothing??
0 likesPros lawyer kept calling victim the murderers name smh
0 likesHe’s treating this interrogation like an audition to be a police officer!
1037 likesReplies (14)
If he hadn’t been convicted I’m sure a police force would’ve hired him.
62 likesgun nuts ARE wannabe cops. Some go on to become cops. Few end up like this dude.
91 likes@Bruce Wayne too many end up cops snd not enough end like him
39 likes@Nick Orsini Agreed. 100%
9 likesWell he created an altercation, escalated the situatuon, used very excessive force and murdered an unarmed black man. I’m surprised they didn’t deputize him on the spot, to be honest.
31 likesHes going about it the right way
1 likeWell cops arrest people for no mask, being outside, etc. this guy would fit right in
1 like@Crispy . because there is a whole lot of racist white people with that guys exact attitude so it's very likely that the victim being black had alot to do with it
4 likes@Democrat Pro no one has been arrested fir not wearing a mask outside. Most cops don't even wear masks outside
1 likeBruce Wayne this is so sad yet so true
0 likesTbh if he's auditioning to be a cop, he passed with flying colors. Shooting an unarmed black man gets you passed the academy and into a cruiser real quick.
1 like@Rodgerwilco91 6 unarmed black men were killed by police last year. Most resisted arrest. The others resulted in police being criminalized.
1 likeThere are millions of police interactions with black people every month.
@Nick Orsini well to end up like him it seems someone has to die..
0 likes@Rodgerwilco91 LMAO
0 likesShows more emotion for his dogs than the man he "accidentally" killed, disgusting
2 likesReplies (1)
The dog was the shooter, that's why. The dog took the gun many times
1 likeNEVER TALK TO COPS - also - DONT KILL PEOPLE
0 likesif this man is policeman he will lose his job but wont be in jail
0 likesI mean this dude acts like it’s the Wild West out here. Like you can you cap people he attack you as your first response
0 likesHonestly this is one of the kinds of people I hate the most, people who buy a gun and fantasise about using it for self defence, being the hero. People who think they're some mini commando. Because when they get into a situation like this, they'll definitely pull the trigger.
815 likesReplies (23)
I understand 100% but this is the US were a gun culture and built around them. If somebody gets shot. They get shot. If somebody dies in a car wreck they die in a car wreck.
3 likes@Spencer Jay that doesn't change how disgusting that culture is. It doesn't matter if it's USA or not. Environmental factors can only excuse so much.
81 likesIf you hit someone with your car your insurance goes up, you get points on your record, and sometimes lose your license, too.
0 likesSane people buy a gun with the plan to never shoot it.
24 likesthats what is gonna happen if you allow any and all random apes to use a lethal affordable ranged weapon, especially in a still primitive society
5 likes@B Ntagkas you wrote that and thought you did something.
1 likePeople say that watching action movies isn’t harmful. And while I don’t think it turns people to serial killers it can confuse people on what is law on when you can use a gun. People like him assume the gun can be used even with mildest threats, and not only when it’s a question of life and death.
2 likes@promontorium ? This guy wasn't handicapped either. He says in-video he has a "pet peeve" about people parking in the handicapped space, likely because his mother-in-law is handicapped.
0 likes@Meghan Sweeney i disagree
0 likesIt doesn't matter what a single persons opinion is. You will not take our guns. Your will not make any gun laws restricting our guns. Freedom will win.
1 like@Autumn Contingency let me guess you are below six foot and post pride month on your story… I am surprised that you have watched this video (and have proven that by citing the camera recording) and do not seem to realize that he fired out of fear. He clearly states that he thought the man who just got physical (out of no where and for no justifiable reason; words would have been fine to “protect” his family) was advancing towards him. It is all about HIS perspective because humans do not have omnipresent views and that is probably indeed what he saw when he finally looked up and broke out of shock.
0 likesI can’t wait to read what an ape below the 99th percentile of intelligence has to respond so please make it quick.
This is the kind of guy who spends his entire life waiting for a moment where he feels justified in shooting someone.
1 likeEvery man has a right to defend his family. You don't have to think your badass but you better belive they'll pull the trigger.
1 like@Autumn Contingency in case you have not been outside, when you get randomly blindsided not a lot of things go on in your brain correctly. I know it is hard to understand for someone who has probably left their basement once every week to get food, but in the real world there is no such thing as perfect judgement. You are using hindsight bias too liberally in his situation. (Im not sure you know what google is, so the definition is when you judge events based off of information received after the fact) He got pushed on to the ground, his brain won’t be going “okay let’s analyze the threat and what’s happening”… he is going straight into self defense. Like I said this may not make sense for someone who doesn’t leave their parents basement once but every week for food but this is how it works in the real world buddy. Fight or flight. Im sure the hardest “fight” you’ve ever been in is the one against diabetes, so don’t try too hard to understand what I’m typing.
0 likes@Autumn Contingency in case you have not been outside, when you get randomly blindsided not a lot of things go on in your brain correctly. I know it is hard to understand for someone who has probably left their basement once every week to get food, but in the real world there is no such thing as perfect judgement. You are using hindsight bias too liberally in his situation. (Im not sure you know what google is, so the definition is when you judge events based off of information received after the fact) He got pushed on to the ground, his brain won’t be going “okay let’s analyze the threat and what’s happening”… he is going straight into self defense. Like I said this may not make sense for someone who doesn’t leave their parents basement once but every week for food but this is how it works in the real world buddy. Fight or flight. Im sure the hardest “fight” you’ve ever been in is the one against diabetes, so don’t try too hard to understand what I’m typing.
0 likes@Will H I mean, living in parent’s basement seems far better than having no parents to teach you a shred of empathy for other human beings. After all, if you did have empathy, you wouldn’t be making this lonely argument with insults you practiced in the shower before typing this. 😴😭😭
2 likes@White Van Epidemic ..wait, you're assuming Will showers?
1 likeBasically Michael Scott with a gun.
1 likeSara Samaletdin the basic laws you need to know to be a productive responsible member of society, should be taught in high school. Even citizens who have no plans to own a gun should be educated in gun safety.
0 likes@Qdude that's absolutely silly, you don't buy a gun just to look at it, and it's dangerous to have a gun if you're not comfortable welding one...
0 likesI think you mean "sane people never plan to shoot anything except targets or quarry"
@Ozymandias ! No shit. You took my quote too literal.
0 likes@Spencer Jay i didnt say "took". im saying they CAN TAKE your guns by passing a law. learn how to read jesus christ
0 likes@Canavero any law formed against the second amendment is unconstitutional. Just like the national firearms Act of 1936 which made it illegal for felons to own firearms.
0 likesThe laywer: video wasn't clear...
0 likesShoot, it was clear as day to me🤦🤷
Not sure if it was mentioned but he did this with two other people before he killed someone. This happened in a very rough area too.
0 likesReplies (1)
The other people were at fault. Micheal is a good guy who wanted to make sure people weren't preventing disabled people from parking. The other two cases were people who were naughty people and needed go be neutralized.
0 likes30 Years!!! Jackpot!!!😱👍🏻🤣🤣
0 likesGeorge Zimmerman is that you ?
6 likesHe was choked that "they" were at "his" cornerstore in "his" neighborhood, and what are "they" doing there ?
He seized the opportunity to play neighborhood cop in order to discourage "them" from coming into "his" neighborhood again, by harrassing them....playing it off like he's doing the store management and the neighborhood a favor, and likely expected affirmation by others.
Thus, after fully embracing the starring role as the armed neighborhood racist bully....he falls shamelessly backwards into the character of the helpless victim, though he was superman 2 minutes ago.
I believe he was looking for a confrontation where he could brandish his weapon to scare them away, and he shot the husband purely out of retribution for ending the power trip he was waging on the man's wife.
He instantly lost all his power and lost face in front of everybody present, so he makes a move to reclaim power and control of the situation. It has nothing to do with self defence.
Replies (1)
Johnny O Day died defending his right of way.
0 likesI like how he was all worried about that handicap parking spot seeing as he just pulls in and illegally parks his vehicle in an unmarked area that is definitely NOT a parking spot. Guess when you’re the parking lot protector the same rules don’t apply to you 🤷🏽♀️
681 likesReplies (17)
Was looking for someone else pointing out his hypocrisy :)
39 likes@Jasko Pdx
19 likesYes, it is even said in the video that he had 4 road rage incidents before this one. He is as much a coward a man can be.
Its only illegal to park in a handicap spot. It's not illegal to park anywhere els in a parking lot. There are no laws saying where you can park (except the handicap spot). It's not a public street. That being said who gives a shit if the guy was illegally parked in the handicap spot.
0 likes@Diddley Squat Wrong but ok 😂😂
9 likes@Ecko that explains it
0 likes@Diddley Squat that’s not how it works old man you can park between lines, in the middle of the parking lot, on the curb, etc. there’s a reason there’s lines displaying where you can park. What they both did was illegal if a non serious crime expect for the trigger happy murder
5 likes@Pie I'm not defending the shooting at all. A cop can't give you a ticket for parking there. A cop can give you a ticket for parking in a handicap spot. They can call the cops to get them to have ask the guy to leave, and if he doesn't he can get a trespassing charge. He can't get a ticket for parking anywhere in the lot, other than the handicap spot. The city didn't put those lines there, the owners did.
0 likesbut you dont get it! that's HIS store!!! lmao /s
0 likes@Adriana Villarreal Lopez lol no it's not watch it again. He said that it was his the way you would say that's my school. The actual owner even said he's a reoccurring "customer"
0 likes@Pie i was referring to him telling the officer that it was his store and that he was a regular lol i know it’s not actually his store that’s why i put (/s which means sarcasm)
0 likes@Adriana Villarreal Lopez ooh okay sorry lol
0 likes@Diddley Squat you are correct. It’s private property and it’s not illegal to park over the lines or with a tire on the curb... whatever. It is illegal to park in an area designated as handicapped parking.
1 likeIt would be illegal to double park, take up two spots, park on the sidewalk, etc., on public property or “government property” like city streets.
Most people don’t understand this. I would encourage everyone to read their local and state laws.
@Pie unfortunately, Pedro, you’re wrong.
1 like@Melody & Her Girls amen
0 likes@Diddley Squat you made two accounts to Pat yourself in the back?
0 likes@Pie oh yeah I made that account 13 years ago so I can argue with you yesterday.
0 likes@Pie I was responding to somebody that said beating a chick to a pulp was alpha. I told him no alpha is a leader that takes care of people. Alpha doesn't mean you're the baddest in the room. What's wrong with that?
1 like“no reason to go overboard”
0 likesmurders
That shooting was stupid. Jeez. His pain in his arms are probably over reacted.. Shooting someone for getting pushed, might've been hard, but still.
0 likesAs a black person this was a self defense but his mistake was instigating the pushing which makes the self defense invalid.
0 likesKeep your hands to yourself, no verbal argument should warrant you putting hands on anyone.
This guy got convicted of manslaughter but an underage boy who committed a federal offense by crossing state lines with an unregistered to kill some has all his charges dropped.
This is self defense, he was only convicted because of the skin color of the person he killed.
Listen to the defense attorneys opening statements around 44:00. This fool is doing a trump impression.
0 likesPretty cringe the guy talking about all the “drills” and scanning for threats and saying affirmative and neutralise.. especially when he has no military or police background.
1846 likesReplies (40)
He was looking for someone to shoot. Honestly, some people take patriotism too far and start having military fantasies about how they "protect and serve" their communities. This guy's having a power trip cause he's got a gun and he thinks he something near police. A family lost their father over that. Disgusting.
324 likesA freaking wannabe
29 likesAlso cringe in how hard he was trying to tell the investigators, “Guys, guys! I’m one of you!”
95 likesYou realize in the military we don't talk like robots right😂 thats just shit that nerds and rejects say cus they saw it in a movie.. common misconception
65 likesseamen caldwell yeah I know lol I’m serving I just think it’s cringe when a civvie tries so hard to act like that
13 likesLegend in his own mind, hero of his own comic book.
10 likes@✪Hidden really what branch bro??
1 likeseamen caldwell Australian army
4 likes*Neutralize
0 likes@A Guy Named Something I’m Australian that’s how we write it
13 likesFunny you say that, I've noticed the only people I have ever heard casually talk like this either had no or very little background in police/military..while everybody I have met who actually did have such backgrounds are personable and try to be casually relatable, instead of impressive.
15 likesdo you have to have military or police background to be educated and informed?
1 likefarmer864 no but this guy is neither
13 likesI thought the same! He plays too much video games in his retirement 🤣
5 likes#SerialPusher
1 likeCici B. most likely just LARPs as a epic special forces secret agent but forget to break character before going to the store
6 likesAs former Navy, I can attest that we talk normally
5 likesOnly when a superior wants our attention do the familiarity gets dropped
@✪Hidden reading these comments on here makes you realize just how many wannabe military members are out there like this guy
6 likes@MysticDragonWolf I got out in April and this is a fact lol
1 likeCaunadan yeah if you find someone talking about this day to day, they’re either wayyy too green or they are acting
0 likesAaron Thompson airsoft warriors
4 likesIt was almost like he was trying to act like he is one of the cops. That's why he asked the cop if he would have done same.
1 like@yodasodaskoda I'm confused over the relationship between the two, are GSD's linked to nazis?
0 likes@jessica romanoff agreed, so many places without guns that are doing just fine, and even then it's not that the US should just completely ban them, but it definitely should be a bit more difficult to obtain a gun.
1 likeGuns won't kill people, but they sure do make it easier.
@caleb Caldwell bro do u really have your rank in your profile name? BOOT
0 likes@farmer864 thank you
0 likes@Jim lahey no I have what I am in my name cus I'm proud to be in the navy? Goodbye bum
1 likeEspecially when he says “negative” cringe
0 likesSo people are only allowed to be knowledgeable if they have worked for the government?
0 likes@caleb Caldwell whatever boot
0 likesYou probably wear your dress blues off base for fun
3 likes@Jim lahey PERFECT RESPONSE
0 likes@A Guy Named Something
0 likesNeutralise is the English way of saying it, and considering the language is English, you are probably more wrong than he is. lol
Yeah he sounds like Mac from always sunny
0 likes@seamen caldwell @Jim lahey in my experience, running into fellas from the navy, its more likely that it's his drink of choice, not his rank
0 likesWild f*ing west - taking a gun in your pocket to go to the store!!!!!!!!only in US
0 likes"I shoot to save my own ass" - be better to shoot with your voice aca communication/ a warning
0 likes01 00 you don’t, his drills suck though and it’s the only thing he talks about
0 likes@Annie Chorley wait til the games start here soon. you ain't seen wild west yet.
0 likes@Annie Chorley but hey, atleast the democrat cancer will be eradicated afterwards
0 likesSo sad when they abuse the second amendment. You miss your girls, ok. Don't you think them kids miss their dad?
0 likesI was in the process of typing "fuck florida" but, woah I am pleasantly surprised
0 likesHe probably would have got head stomped if he would have not had a firearm,but handicapped illegal parking confrontation??? I would have just went in the store.
1 likeReplies (1)
Don't go around provoking confrontations and you'll never have to worry about getting head stomped.
1 like19 minutes for an ambulance???
1 likethis dude talks way to confidently for someone who didn’t even ask for a lawyer
1110 likesReplies (20)
So cringy 🙉
7 likesThats how being in the military can change you! smooth, relax in any situations
1 likei guess he was rooting for this day
3 likesHe though he was all cool with the police and that they were on his side. Little did he know they were just trying to get his trust to confess things
8 likesInsane that he didn’t ask for a lawyer. Insane.
2 likes@happyfacefries bruh, I swear if I see one more fellow internet dweller call other people narcissist
2 likes@Epoch of An Era I didn't call the poster a narcissist, I called the criminal a narcissist. And if you looked up the definition, you would agree that the criminal IS a narcissist
1 like@happyfacefries He might be. I'm not saying he can't be. It's just that people who throw that word around at every opportunity seem kinda sus to me.
2 likes@Epoch of An Era look up the definition of a narcissist. I am not throwing the term around loosely. If you think Michael isn't one, go get your head checked, but he not only matches the definition but reminds me of my birth father who is a diagnosed narcissist
4 likes@John Mullin his lawyer did a really bad job in the end.
5 likesHe only had to say that Michael didn’t see the first step because he was recovering from the push, he didn’t see the second because he was occupied drawing his gun and the 3rd step unfortunately look to him as a forward step (although in reality it was a turning step).
-should have made clear that he was not racist, as the only reason he approached the car was because it was parked in the discapacitated slot and at first Michael was unaware of the family’s race.
-should have also made clear that he didn’t shoot out of anger. And that the reason there was just 1 round fired is because he no longer felt in danger.
- it was a nasty surprise when he learnt that the man he shot died.
And that’s it!!!! The man would be free.
I mean, I still think he shot out of anger but that’s not the point.
@happyfacefries I still haven’t looked it up but I think you’re wrong saying that somebody in your family is medically described as a narcissist. Narcissism as well as hypocrisy can’t be medically measured.
1 likeIn Spanish we have an other term that’s “megalómano” to which English translation you might have wanted to refer to.
@metaphysicalgraffiti yes, those narcissists amirite 🤦♂️
1 like@happyfacefries Thank you, man. Sorry if I misjudged you. It's just that people tend to throw that word around and their actions show how ironic they're being. Case in point, Mr. Educated a.k.a. metaphysicalgrafitti over here.
2 likesNegative. Force multiplier. Tango down. Neutralize the threat. TIRANDO GRENADA!!! UAV incoming.
3 likesHe made the mistake of trusting the system. Never ever talk to anyone except a lawyer.
0 likes@TheDuranceFurnace I mean to be fair he also killed a man after starting an altercation over a parking spot.
1 like@Epoch of An Era 80% of people don't even know what narcissism is. I bet they couldn't even recognize most narcissists. Also, narcissism shouldn't be stigmatized as it is a permanent mental condition which brings many disadvantages with it.
0 likesHe probably believes he is a lawyer. People like him believe that they know everything about everything.
1 likeToo*
0 likes@unai_a secas Narcissistic Personality Disorder is literally in the DSM, what are you talking about? Of course it can be medically measured, it's disordered by psychologists.
0 likesJeeesus I’m never parking in a handicap spot ever again
2 likesReplies (2)
Honestly I doubt you did before you watched this video... You have you have to have a certain... mindset in order to park in handicapped spots.
2 likesThe state I live in, it's a $581 fine and 1 demerit point for illegally parking in a handicap spot.
0 likesThe prosecutor giving off huge Chewbacca defense vibes.
0 likesHe speaks so oddly to me
1 like4:17 i visibly frowned oh no
0 likesSo basically this guy was angry at someone’s crappy parking decisions YET he himself isn’t even parked in a DESIGNATED PARKING SPOT
1711 likesReplies (59)
He's special. He has a gun. Who else is going to be the last bad ass left on Earth?
57 likesSeriously, though, you're right. That Rittenhouse kid who went off killing people with a gun he should have never had in a community he wasn't from is another case. They're LARPers looking for a reason. And the second comes up, they fire. Probably with the words, "okay man, it's all been leading up to this" going through their mind.
In that other case, the kid had to illegally bring an AR15 across state lines without an FOID card into another community. He was even one of those kid police cadets. The law doesn't matter to those people no matter how much they like to pretend.
Doesn't much matter to me, either, but I've never pretended the "law is blind" or whatever they chant while falling asleep holding the blue line flag.
HOW ABOUT THEM YANKEES
3 likes@Random Username wow you need help and eye glasses.
10 likes@Ogre what are you talking about.
4 likesirrelevant
4 likes@senorbeast09 I mean, it kinda is considering his "I'm going to start an altercation over illegal parking while parking illegally.
9 likes@Random Username
6 likesparking like that isnt illegal, parking in a designated handicap spot is illegal
@senorbeast09 so I can just pull into a parking lot and park my car outside of a designated parking space. Thanks for the tip! You'll pay my parking tickets, yea?
12 likes@Random Username
10 likescorrect. you can park wherever you want at a gas station as long as it doesn't impede traffic on public roadways. the worst that will happen is you will be asked to leave for parking like an idiot.
bottom line: Michael didn't "illegally" park, the single mother did, however
Inquisitive Cameron I live in a city and there’s city codes for parking regulations.
6 likesSo what we do here is WE PARK BETWEEN WHITE LINE DESIGNATED PARKING SPOTS
@john dodo exactly, I agree. That wasn't a designated parking spot, therefore he is illegally parked.
7 likes@senorbeast09 you would have to source that, I cannot find any legal precedent for that claim. Cars are to park in designated parking spaces.
3 likesInquisitive Cameron I AGREE 100%
2 likes@john dodo well.... Good! lol. I just find these people to be ridiculous. If you want to play Johnny Law, be a cop. I mean, don't, please, but you know what I mean. And if you are going to do some dumb stuff like this, don't start off the bat with blatant hypocrisy.
7 likesI'll never get these cop LARPers or the idiots who defend them.
Inquisitive Cameron LARPERS 😂😂😂 thats is a hilarious term
2 likesYou forget how this guy looked for trouble while rittenhouse actively avoided shooting until the last moment
8 likes@john dodo
2 likesoh man, somebody give this intellectual a Nobel Prize, he single-handedly just BTFO any dissenting opinion/counter-argument with one simple trick
senorbeast09 reveal the simple trick!
2 likessenorbeast09 So killing someone for this when you are a citizen is ok?
1 like@Lars van Zutphen
1 likeyou're the only one ITT saying that, chief
@Random Username I think there is a huge difference between Rittenhouse and this case.
10 likesIn this case, at the sight of a gun the attacker immediately retreated, and was shot while he kept increasing the distance, not facing the person laying down and not showing any intentions to attack.
In case of Rittenhouse , he was running away from attackers, he got pushed and they kept on charging expecting him not to shoot.
Intentions of being armed in both cases are irrelevant. For me Rittenhouse self defense was very rational.
Riddickk Are you saying it’s okay that he killed that man because he pushed him?
3 likes@Random Username This was refuted Kyle Rittenhaus didn't bring the gun across state lines. I reccomend you watch Colion Noir's vides
5 likes(Oh and he then killed someone, but you know whose paying attention right?)
1 like@Random Username Did you have prolonged restrictive breathing in the birthing canal? How can you compare this to the Rittenhouse case? You have a short circuit between what your eyes see and how your brain interprets it. Get help!!
3 likes@Random Username Careful, you have inaccurate facts regarding the self defense situation surrounding the incident with the rioters. There's a lot of wrong information floating around from when it first went down that has now been entirely discredited. Using early and often highly inaccurate information, especially from sources such as the mainstream media that feeds off of chaos, to form the basis of your ideology or opinions on topics is dangerous as the information is almost always misleading or wrong when incidents like that happen and not until much later does the more nuanced truth of reality begin to shine through.
3 likes@Random Username rittenhouse did nothing wrong
2 likes@M Verheul k. Objectively wrong, but k.
2 likes@Random Username lets wait for trial
1 like@senorbeast09 not a source. But if you want to be technical about it...
3 likesIn FL, parking lots are considered private property. That, in itself, makes any collisions in said parking lots a lot more difficult to handle. That being said, either neither were parked illegally due to private property, could have called for a tow but that's it.
And as far as asking for a source? That's standard from anyone countering an argument. If you stayed in school and paid attention, you'd know that. So essentially you would then have to go looking for precedent that argues in your favor.
This isn't difficult. I may have been a bit hyperbolic in the legality considering the circumstances of private lots, but not inherently wrong. To say both people were incorrectly parked would be more accurate on a technical level.
Doesn't change anything, dude still went all Evil Barney Fife.
@M Verheul let's not. IDC about trial. I'm not on the jury. I know what happened. I watched what happened. He should have been at home in Illinois with a bedtime.
2 likes@Random Username Kyle was a minuteman, not a cop larper, tool. These people were in kenosha helping the police, with their blessing. There with others to prevent damage to buildings (because the people doing it won't want to get shot.) and give first aid. You're comparing a warzone to not a warzone. A violent mob chasing a person to an altercation between two people. You're not very inquisitive. I doubt you could define inquiry.
4 likes@Random Username of course you don't care about a trial once you're called out on the bullshit you're spewing. Kyle is a hero, your opinion on that does not change anything.
2 likes@William Gruff one can argue that, sure. One would objectively be wrong for solely putting the incident on said couple, but yea, anyone can argue anything. And had the situation played out differently, it may even be agreeable.
2 likesThat being said, it didn't and it's not.
@Random Username
3 likes"glad to know you're rooting for the super villain"
hahahaha what is with you soyboys thinking everything is a Marvel movie?
@senorbeast09 fantasies all they know, he doesn't know anything about the case clearly.
1 likeI remember recently parking next to a car in the handicapped spot. I got upset someone was parked there... and I went by and looked at the license...and she had a handicap license plate... I felt silly (and thankful). On the other hand, I have seem a restaurant owner go after someone for not legitimately parking in a handicapped spot and made the man move. It was a ugly scene.
2 likes@Trepidity Trepidity generally speaking I agree with you. In this particular case I don't think that is what it was based on the information we saw.
2 likes@Random Username you're incredibly wrong about the kenosha events.
4 likesDrejka didn't ATTACK anyone, either.
2 likes@;askoefj k. Not sure how. There are many reports of Kyle brandishing his weapon before hand, he was given water and encouraged by the police, he illegally brought a gun out of state from Illinois to WI without an FOID card, he was the stressor and aggressor by open carrying said illegally brought AR15, and I have merely added the not so illogical conclusion he was there to use his weapon and make his cop daddy's proud. He just needed the perceived excuse. So regardless if you're given that excuse or not is irrelevant.
3 likesIt was HIS store. He goes there EVERY DAY.
1 likeHe can do what he wants!
I get angry when people park in disabled spots without a permit card up because im disabled myself but all i do is take photos of the car and license plates and forward the details to the council to fine them id never actually get into a physical altercation or kill someone over it that’s ridiculous (plus I physically couldn’t even if i wanted to due to my disabilities).
2 likes@senorbeast09 doesn't matter. If her parking bothered him that much ...report it and move on. Even the owner of the convenient store told him to stop harassing the customers and the judge who sentenced Drejka said he found it ironic because Drejka himself parked illegally.
3 likes@senorbeast09 It still wasn't his job to police the parking lot. He could have taken the plate number and reported it. Michael admits however to doing stuff like this on multiple occasions. Also, pretty sure it's illegal to murder someone. Which Michael did.
1 like@Nrg Bunni - Well, yeah. Of course it's totally unreasonable to SAY something to the aipette... These things are animals who have NO IMPULSE CONTROL, and it got it's ass shot off due to it's unwarranted violent outburst.
1 likeLandontalks
1 like@Random Username Did you watch the video's about Kyle? Why start this conversation at all? Really weird to compare this with Kyle..
2 likesHe actually was there to help. You do know that the only reason people were going after him is because he put out a fire? Then a suspected crazy person with a death wish(literally!) starts to charge him, understandably gets shot. Then an unknown number of people want to lynch him and it doesn't go their way. I suspect you're butthurt because you see yourself as one of those people, but hey, if it went the other way round I'd be mad too.
If he was there to mow down people he would have done a hell of a better job
You fail to understand that he's THERE everyday and that's HIS store, bro
1 likeITS HIS STORE!
2 likesHIS HUNTING GROUNDS.
PERIODT
KA- BOOM!!! So he didn’t cross state lines ?
3 likesKA- BOOM!!! This excuse doesn’t work for weed that come from Colorado in Utah so definitely shouldn’t work for firearms
2 likes@KA- BOOM!!! Didn't look like he was very well supervised when he was shooting protesters.
2 likes@Dogald Trump Rittenhouse is a different case. The question of whether his life was in danger because he willingly placed himself in a dangerous situation is the one that needs to be answered. From there, it snowballs... If you see someone shoot someone else, and you shoot them, are you justified? If someone tries to detain you after you have used deadly force. do you have the right to self-defense?
1 likeIf he was on private property on behalf of someone, there is no argument. If he was retreating from a demonstration, or even a riot, there is no argument. If people went after him after putting out the dumpster, there is no argument. The lack of experience may have prompted him from leaving the danger to going through the danger to find the safety of the police.
One of the big arguments I think will be made is, did Kyle Rittenhouse fear for his life because he was concerned someone would take his weapon and use it on him? That can go the way of 3rd degree murder. It doesn't matter who he was, or who he shot (and their records), the initial circumstance sets the stage for what follows.
Hey, what are you talking about, It’s “his” store.
1 likeAnd he's angry to be living in Florida.
1 likeWell it’s different for him. He owns the place 🙄🙄. Oh wait no he doesn’t.
1 like@Random Username -Look up the laws in the State you live in. In public parking lots of stores in Florida there is no law that says you HAVE to park in the drawn spaces.
1 like@Nun Ya I did. And I've gotten a ticket before for not parking in a designated parking spot in a parking lot. And that's when I owned parking.
1 likeDefinitely NOT justifiable. Ridiculous.
1 likewere did all the comments go ? was this video private?
5 likesReplies (1)
it was taken down by youtube for some violating the terms of service, he is reuploading them now. They were all gone (or at least most of them) for some time.
0 likesit seems like he was looking for trouble.
0 likesYou could say he.... Jumped the gun
2 likesReplies (1)
Nice
0 likesThis guy has psychological issues for sure. His confidence is terrifying, he was going to kill someone eventually.
851 likesReplies (12)
@CrazyMiles I see Jesus Christ also spams YouTube comment section with irrelevant dogma
83 likes@CrazyMiles Have you ever thought about defending Deutschland?
1 like@Lord I can understand it. I just don’t get the it in my reality lol. Something made this dude snap. Prior to this incident no doubt.
1 likeClearwater FL is the scientology city after all.
1 like@CrazyMiles lol. Why spam that message on the internet. Do you believe you’ll have a better chance of crossing the pearly gates for it?
3 likes@JoEnUtZ23 I think their trying to help others cross the pearly gates, they need a better strategy
0 likesYeah, you can see how calm he is. Collective, friendly even. But you can here the subtle tremble in his voice. Not fear, no no, not fear at all. He was mostly honest, eerie in his language. I wouldn’t say he was in the wrong, but neither the right.
0 likes@Lord someone who got pushed around in high school
0 likesYou see confidence I see extreme insecurities
1 like@Mikael B wait wait wait. What do you think people are going to hell for?
0 likes@Lord well the point is, if you are blindside hit in public onto concrete, naturally, any humans fight or flight response will kick in, which is survival instinct and you would draw ur weapon almost automatically (especially if he’s telling the truth of carrying a gun more than half of his life).
1 likeWhen he pulled out the gun, it was justified because, well frankly you never know what can happen. What if instead of it being that dad it had been an actual assailant or someone who intended on kicking his ass? That’s why drawing the gun is justified. At that point the interaction peaks and in this case, the father tried to get away and took multiple steps away before being shot.
In conclusion,
His reaction to being pushed was justified scientifically and with common sense, however once it continued, it definitely was an evil act of some sort as that man posed absolutely no threat
He didn’t have psychological issues he just thought he would get away with it
0 likeshe was parked closer to the fucking entrance than they were: choose ur battles
1 likeReplies (1)
So you condone violence on a person just talking? Odd.
0 likesEven with that guy humblebragging himself in to a conviction, that video evidence was honestly open and shut on his fate. Yeah, the guy pushed him down, but he was clearly not a threat and even was walking away when Michael shot him.
3 likesReplies (1)
and he did what everyone would do in the same situation.He was yelling in his wife's face so he just pushed him away
0 likesHe shot the unarmed gentleman. In the situation he caused, then cry victim in the very situation he created and shoot and kill a unarmed man who tried to back away.
0 likesReplies (1)
He didnt have any idea he would be assaulted for simply telling someone not to park in a handicap spot. The deceased man broke the law when he assaulted Drejka by the way.
0 likesUpdate: He was sentenced to 20 years in prison 🙏
1 likePLEASE post an interrogation where investigators are trying to get a confession but eventually he is proven innocent (like really innocent, not just by law)
278 likesReplies (9)
usually its 8 hours long interrogations where the innocent is psychologically tortured bc police chose them as guilty. I think Cofession tapes has some cases.
25 likesSometimes they just give false confessions to end the torture. Look up false confession tapes
10 likesIs there a different kind of innocent ?
2 likes@drebk Innocent by law = prosecution cannot prove guilt (even tho you may have done the crime), true innocence = you really didn't do it
11 likes@notsure ifsrs ok, i guess that makes sense, but there is actually no verdict of 'innocent' at law.
3 likesWhich makes the question even more strange, particularly since 'facts' and 'evidence' get their own special definitions in the courtroom as well.
So, are we talking about being factually innocent as something completely different than what the facts on evidence at trial show?
Or a scenario of wrongful conviction, Where for example DNA evidence exhonerates the accused who was interrogated and confessed and we have that confession on tape. (because that would be interesting to see). Unfortunately wrongful convictions aren't as rare as one might like.
being ajudicated guilty or innocent is a legal concept.
@AG AG why bother with anything else?
2 likesnotsure ifsrs if someone could get footage of the Israeli police coercing a rape victim into self-blame, that would be tremendous.
1 likeThere are actually two that have been posted which fit your description. One was a black dude who was riding a bus who was incorrectly accued. The other was some white lady from Texas if I remember correctly who's boyfriend committed suicide and the cop was screaming at her trying to get her to say she murdered him.
0 likesLook up the "west memphis three" case. Not wuite the same thing but its very interesting.
1 likeHe seemed a little trigger happy ngl
0 likesHe's a coward
0 likesThis is why scared people should not carry a guns. He didn't notice any 'threath' by analysing the mans face or body movements, the only thing he noticed is that he was black. That is so telling, scary and sad. I am so glad that i live in a country where these irrational people are not allowed to carry guns.
1 likeA verbal confrontation should absolutely never turn into a physical one. As a matter of fact, a strong push such as the one this man experienced could have killed him! I wonder what people would be saying if that push would have killed the white guy and the black guy had never been shot. I suspect the black guy would have experienced a lot more scrutiny. people who solve their problems with their fists are like brute beasts. I am not defending the white guy in the least bit. Both the black and the white guy were wrong! Actually, I'm pretty sure that if the white guy had never pulled out a gun, he more than likely could have pressed charges against the black guy! I have been robbed and roughed up by a group of black guys. I was also beat up pretty badly by one of my ex girlfriend's step dad and I couldn't figure out why! Getting violated in that way is absolutely traumatizing. I dealt with anger for years after that! putting your hands on another human being to inflict harm is a gross violation of their basic human rights. most of you have your morals all screwed up that's why this world is so screwed up
0 likesCan we talk about how the handicap spot was the farthest parking spot from the actual store.
756 likesReplies (28)
Thank you, Sara!!
17 likesThat’s what I noticed.
6 likesok and
2 likes@Ali Mashhour sadly, if someone has to explain it, you probably dont care.
100 likesLITERALLY
1 like@Ali Mashhour ok and
3 likesSorry i'm thick, whats wrong with parking there?? /Gen
4 likes@J.RABBIT its meant for people with disabilities only. (to make it easier for them) meaning people shouldnt park there if they dont have a disability thats all.
15 likes@J.RABBIT the handicapped parking spot is usually located closer to the entrance of the store so that it's easily accessible without needing to walk a long distance, so it should be right in front of the convenience store (or closest spot to the entrance for other locations) but it's actually furthest away. It's meant for people with disabilities, and parking there if you don't have a disability takes away the access from people who need it.
41 likesPretty sure there was a ramp or something there tho
17 likesSeriously wtf is up with that 😂
0 likesYes we can... Thats where the ramp is. Have a nice day.
5 likesThat's probably because the store and the building is old and the ramp up to the sidewalk was put in later to bring the building up to code, therefore the place they built the ramp dictated where they put the handicap spot.
0 likesPossibly an answer? The corner of a sidewalk is the easiest and safest spot to drop the curb down so wheelchairs can get onto it. I'm pretty sure some city codes require curbs in front of a glass store- fronts to be high enough that a parked vehicle can't roll up and smash it.
4 likesSource: my uncle lays sidewalks for my city
they put handicap parking spots closest to ramps so they dont have complications with ledges/drops and whatnot, hope this helps
2 likesCan we talk about how the driver of the car, that parked illegally in the handicap spot, is the first one at fault for her man dying?
0 likes@Ali Mashhour there is good chance you nay need to use the hanicap parking spot!
0 likesI can see there is a ramp there, and there is a bright (probably yellow) colored step in the spots in front of the door, not to mention it's to tight to squeeze a wheelchair through those parking curbs
1 like@JRugg1 1980 We can talk how it should never have escalated to him shooting the guy in the first place because of a Handicap Parking spot.
1 likeHe can inform whoever else that suppose to deal with that kind of stuff; the store's clerk, a Parking Warden, or... You know... The police... after he reminded the woman inside the car to move Instead of Arguing with a woman like an Idiot. He can inform the dude, whose also unarmed mind you, that pushed him that he's packing by either verbally saying it and/or show the holstered gun, which a Licensed and Trained Gun owner should do according to their Rule of Conduct when they are confronted with a Bystander.
But of course, Illegal parking should be sanctioned by death I guess
@Ari Bantala absolutely.. if there was more of this, people would start thinking of the consequences, and less of it would happen.
0 likesAs someone who has to drive a wheelchair bound person around I honestly love the spots that are off to the side (assuming they have cordoned off space to pull a wheelchair ramp out of the vehicle.) Feel less guilty about taking up 2 prime spots by the doors. Obviously not for every disabled person as some can still walk.
0 likes@Robert Carsten i have COPD and have a placard. Its not all so obvious to people, some of the handicaps
1 likeGood point and one the Judge made but it remains illegal for somebody without handicap tags to park there so that was violation #1 followed by McGlockton assaulting Drejka which was violation #2.
1 likeIt looks like that there is a ramp right next to the spot. So it makes sense for that specific parking spot to be the handicap one. Agreed that it should be closer to the main entrance but as far as I know near the ramp is where it's technically supposed to be.
0 likes@Sabrason finally someone with some senses
0 likesLol 😂
0 likes@Shawn Myers I was high when I wrote that my apologies
0 likes@Ali Mashhour fair lol
1 likeDraco?? His ma' must have loooooved Harry Potter!
0 likesHis initials are M. A. D. 🤣🤣🤣
1 likeThis guy is a coward
2 likesNo placard?? Who the hell has placards?
2 likesHe gives off wanna be cop to me, type that never made it in & goes about town acting like he's cleaning up the town.
2646 likesReplies (22)
Exactly...The sad thing is if he was an off duty cop he would be walking around free. This dude thought was was going to get the same special treatment that police officers get after they pull the trigger.
131 likes@DrNogueiras White guy shoots gun:
2 likesSJW: Reminds me of Zimmerman
@SqueakyCheeks loool mate just stop you're embarrassing yourself
49 likes@DrNogueiras I'd actually love to have an extensive collection of pink and purple guns. Just imagine that. Maybe some kittens and puppies on them, too, who knows. Gotta embrace the stereotype amirite :P
14 likes@Baruuu100 Well if you are the type to identify yourself as an extensive gun owner when no one asked 🤷
2 likes@DrNogueiras Sorry, I didn't know that vague book you wrote in the comment box was supposed to be a comparison to anything that actually happened. I guess everything can be related to zimmerman if you simplify it enough.
1 like@DrNogueiras Oh my gosh, I'd love to see those! Do you have any pictures of them to share? :3 and nah, I'm not fussed, 'men' who berate women are dumb and boring and need to sit down :D I'm sure he's a mommy's boy anyway :P
9 likes@Baruuu100 I'm not an incel, but sick burn! I was referring to elena. There I fixed it. I just know the type. Guns should be respected not something you collect in every color. I was correct as well.
2 likes@DrNogueiras Maybe you should look up the buzzwords because you were doing just that. Dude was convicted in some kangaroo court after his case was all over the local news... I watched the video I never saw him screaming. She actually escalated the situation by getting out of the car. Amazing how she "is backed up by complete strangers" as she gets out of the car to yell back while your good guy attacks. Lets not minimize physical violence, that's what started the whole deal. Anyway if the dude was waving guns around before he should go away for that, not for defending himself. 20 is crazy.
3 likesYeah the wanna -be cop type that ends up a Security Guard or Mall Cop 😒
1 likeHe probably tells people he "thought about joining the military a lot"
3 likeshe's underequipped, it screams whacker.
0 likesI guess he wanted to be something like Jake Gylenhall from Prisoners
0 likesAnd it’s not even hard to be a cop. You don’t even need a college education.
0 likes@Default Account Holy fuck that comment is just dripping with racism... amazed that no one called this shit out.
0 likesEvidently he did
1 likeone handicapped parking spot at a time.
1 like@Trevor Jones Lmao
1 likehe did clean one potential criminal off the streets
0 likesok i get it. so if you warn somebody not to use the handicapped spot or call out someone for behaving unlawfully, which is bedides compulsory for every citizen, then you are a wannabe cop... interesting, now we know this too. what else? free LCD TVs?
1 likeTaxi driver
0 likes@Krisztián we don't say coloured anymore. It's deemed as racist.
0 likesSay nothing. Wait for your lawyer.
0 likesI've just noticed his right are has miraculously healed....praise the Lord.
0 likesForce Multiplier= Escalation
0 likesThe way he’s literally acting like his arm is broken and trying to play victim is disgusting.
1358 likesReplies (14)
he’s not trying to play the victim as much as he is trying to garner sympathy and paint himself as a righteous vigilante.
35 likesAround 28 mins I believe, he’s waving his right arm around, using it to make points while hitting it on the table etc. Must hurt reeeal bad, lol.
59 likesOne minute he had his arm up his shirt as broken the next it’s right there on the table lmfao
20 likes@Siham'stakeon I was literally wondering where his sling went when I read this 😂
8 likesHe's got that little makeshift sling on his arm it's pretty funny
11 likesit's too bad that he didn't lawyer up. a better outcome would have resulted.
5 likes@Jimbo Jones gotta live the part 🤣
0 likesHe's a weak angry man who thinks he's tough for no other reason that he had a gun and the ability to kill anyone who stood up to him after he initiated a confrontation
9 likesDude was like “I’m still sore from when he hit me from the back”💀
0 likesI love how the cops keep reminding him he's supposed to be faking an injury, low key, and he's like "nah, it's good."
6 likesThe man was just deffinding himself they put an innocent hero in jail i bet she don't park in no handicap kno mo lol.
0 likes@Manuel Olivas He killed someone over a parking spot????
2 likesyea like when the cop says " anything broken " he says "no"
2 likes@Timmy Vawwter
0 likesit's too bad that he didn't lawyer up. a better outcome would have resulted.A better outcome for him, but not for society. Dude has a history, and while I don't think he should have been shoved to the ground he did kind of initiate the entire chain of events that led to his own demise.
I'm always amazes me how investigators are calm ,friendly, like they're buddies with murderers of the worst kind. They'll sit face to face with child molester murderers and are able to maintain their calmness. They teach me to be calm in such a chaotic world.
1519 likesReplies (32)
Exactly my thoughts. It would be a hell of an effort for me to stay zen while facing a criminal racist piece of shit who thought he did the right thing.
39 likes@Carlos V Yeah I know. It amazes me.I couldn't,not with such calmness,with his kind sitting inches away from me.
4 likesWhat amazes me even more, is the fact that these criminals never seem to understand that they are being played by the interragators. These ppl think the police are their friend and are on their side, when they are the exact opposite.
38 likesthats why there are so few female investigators
8 likes@escalopes you mad because its true
2 likesIt's great how the police just let them dig themselves into a deeper and deeper hole.
6 likesIt's actually really easy to be friends with a murderer. Imagine how many people you hate that that murderer could take care of for you.
3 likesI agree, although this was a heat of the moment situation between two adults which in my opinion is different to a man who has stalked, plotted, sexually assaulted then murdered a defenceless female victim or worse still a child as we have seen in other JCS videos. In some cases the victims were even dismembered.
5 likesI wouldn’t call him the worst kind, he did get pushed to the ground first. But ya, he didn’t have to shoot him.
0 likesLol it’s a psychological game to them. Probably no greater rush then being the reason a murderer tells on themselves
7 likesthe calmer they are, the more likely these horrible people will end up convicted
6 likesYou should watch the detective interrogating The amazon killer aka Todd Kohlhepp. He (the detective) makes the murderer so calm and friendly that he (the murderer) literally admits to every single thing he’s done lol it’s infuriating to watch how he’s treated (the killer) even fed like a king. Until you realize it’s all an act to get him to confess
4 likes@escalopes defending cops and villainizing teachers is so crazy
1 like@NoraAlbo And what would you do if he was sitting inches away from you? lol
1 like@Iv JO My phsyce wouldn't be as layed back as these guys lol These guys are detectives and phsychologists . I watched the Chris Watts interrogation holy mother i was blown away how calm they are sitting 3 ft across from a guy who killed his pregnant wife and 2 children. I know they're phsycologically trained in dealing with criminals and murderers...I couldn't.
1 likeThey've heard and seen it all
1 likeAnger and fear can cloud judgement. Just like how the defendants fear & anger clouded his judgement right before he pulled the trigger. I'm sure there's a relevant "Yoda" quote about fear and anger but I can't think of it.
1 likeYeah not everyone is an emotional wreck
2 likesLike managers in a workplace, great with you until its time for redundancies then youre a number
1 likeDude had to sit there thinking “wait, so this guy’s about to tell me a whole story explaining how/why he shot someone because they were parked in the handicap and pushed you down?”
1 likeI can’t talk to my boyfriend of 3 years when he gives me the ick 😂 I’d be so mean to these doouche bag strangers
1 like@Olivia Pennington 😄😆
0 likesIsn't part of their training to pretend they're calm and somewhat friendly, so they make sure the suspect gives enough information?
1 likeOr am I wrong?
I see it as completely performative and I am sure most of them must have a really strong composure to deal with every case.
@Kalypso Theodoreskou Yes of coarse, it's part of their training. What I meant was,when I watch detectives calm and collect, with the most vile murderers ,it makes me want to practice to be as calm in these crazy times we are living in,with some nutty people out there.The nuttiest we've seen in our lifetime. As for detectives in a box size room,with say a child molester serial killer? God bless them for their patience....I couldn't.
0 likesI could never! The patience it takes is just out of this world
1 like@mirrbot Exactly. You need crazy amount of patience. In a nut shell ,that's been my point.
0 likesYou don't have the experience in interviewing people to understand
0 likes@MTRA oh wow you really managed to make something misogynistic. good job bro.
1 likeAds are outrageous
0 likesI think its easy. Think about it, cops are probably suspicious about this guy's intent. They probably saw the camera footage first before interrogation and can immediately tell this guy is sus. So the key to getting the suspect to getting arrested is to play buddy. It puts the suspect in a false state of security and will make them admit things that they normally wouldnt disclose. That is the key to criminal interrogation and psychology. Its not for everyone but the ones that are able to play friend tend to excel in this line of work.
0 likesI would guess those talents are developed so that a suspect is a lot less likely to ask for a lawyer or clam up.
0 likesIts basic interrogation tactics, how's that hard to comprehend?
0 likesFor anyone defending this guy, take this into consideration. This dude illegally parks his car to scream at that lady for illegaly parking. Also, this guy was a public menace. This was the 5th recorded incident of him pulling a gun out on someone, 2 of the previous people were unarmed women. I think he's been dying for an excuse to shoot someone for a long time and he finaly put himself in a situation where he thought he'd get away with it.
1915 likesReplies (183)
He got shoved ONE TIME. That alone shouldn't be used as a defense.
152 likesL Vader I agree he shouldn’t have pushed him, but it’s kind of harsh to call a guy a thug for trying to protect his family
307 likesL Vader what exactly is a thug?
56 likes@L Vader Ok, let me make sure I understand. By saying that Markeis "assaulted" first, you agree that some form of escalation is warrented or should be expected. Maybe not murder, but something, right? HOWEVER, Michael is the one who assaulted first, he was yelling at his wife in a "threating", "angry", and "authorative" maner. The husband hears, a comotion doesn't know the context, but sees an angry man yelling at his wife (In the south, I may add), so he uses his arms as a "force multiplier" to neutralize the threat to his family. Why shouldn't Michael have expected escalation when HE is the one who started the confrontation? Following your logic, why doesn't Michael recieve all the blame for starting the incedent in the first place?
162 likesLet's look at this objectively, he was only PUSHED to the ground, he was not met with lethal force by the victim. While he probably felt embarrassed and emasculated, that was no reason to kill the man. Drejka could of likely had an assault case against him had he not killed him. He didn't pull a weapon out or anything. While yes, he shouldn't of pushed the man to the ground, Drejka should of just minded his own damn business.
105 likes@L Vader you got it all wrong. If we all acted like we should have, we wouldn't be where we are. But he overreacted, simple
8 likesIf the guy was coming back at him when he shit it would be different but this guy was begging for an excuse to shoot someone "in self defense"
26 likes@L Vader and a crazy man parking illegally and screaming at a woman with children in the car is bringing thug energy before her boyfriend even arrived. The boyfriend pushed a thug who was harassing his family. How did you miss that fact?
48 likesYeah I agree he was probably looking for a reason. You could tell the way he hesitated before he shot him.
3 likes@beakt A thug? For defending his family? I doubt Markeis would have immediately resorted to violence, without talking, if Michaels had first directed his vitriol towards him.
22 likes@Unknown Chick My b, I didn't see that you already had this covered, cheers, man.
1 likeExactly.. He absolutely did NOT have to shoot that man. Yes he got pushed, but he did not have to use deadly force. The victim obviously pushed him and took 2 paces back (everyone can see that). The victim did not take even one step towards him.. Was definitely unlawful for him to shoot the man.
16 likesL Vader I agree with what you said, except calling him a thug. I don’t think he was a thug. If McGlockton was a thug then so was Drejka. Where is the line between being a thug and being protective of your family? I think McGlockton overreacted , he was standing in the store and heard Robert Costello come in and tell the Store owner, “ There’s an altercation out there, you’d better intervene.” That’s what Robert Costelli testified he said ....the lady who was in the store at the same time, Vicky Conrad, who also testified said that Costelli had said “ there’s a problem out there, you’d better go check...” in either event, Costelli entered the store and implied something dramatic was happening in the parking lot and required the Store owner’s assistance. Most likely this caused McGlockton concern knowing his partner and two young babies were out there. Conrad also testified that she could hear the yelling from inside the store. Whatever the level of yelling, when McGlockton went out of the store. Costelli felt the need to go after him and was ready to intervene if necessary. This tells me that whatever Costelli said greatly concerned Markeis and when he went out and saw Drejka yelling at his girlfriend, and as he walked over, his concern and need to get Drejka away from Brittany was the only thing on his mind. All he knew at that point was that a guy had come in to the store very concerned about an altercation in the parking lot, he goes out and sees it’s right at his car with his partner and babies, Drejka was most likely still yelling as he didn’t see Markeis coming his way. Markeis‘ instinct was to shove the guy away from Brittany, who by that time had gotten out of the car. Now, I don’t agree with Markeis just coming up behind Drejka and shoving him. It was a very hard shove, and since Drejka was blindsided he didn’t have any chance to stop the impact of hitting the ground. Markeis absolutely should have stopped and told Drejka to talk to him about the issue, not Brittany. Now that doesn’t diminish Drejka’s mistake either. Drejka should not have approached Brittany and the car. Plain and simple, he was in the wrong. Especially after it was discovered that the Store owner had specifically asked Drejka NOT to accost the customers who parked in that handicap spot without the proper placards. We also learned that Drejka had a ha it of approaching cars and drivers and reprimanding them for parking there. Drejka is not the handicap parking police, as much as he wants to think he is. Approaching a woman alone in her car with the specific purpose of telling her she doing something wrong is completely inappropriate. After Markeis shoved Drejka he does in fact take two steps towards Drejka but to me it seemed to be more out of the continuing momentum of his body going forward, part of the same action as the shove. Then, he stops. Drejka rolls up and already has the gun in his hand and shoots. When Drejka shot, Markeis was not moving forward at all. This is Drejka tragic mistake. Had Drejka sat up with the gun in hand and stopped, everything would have turned out differently. Instead, he shot without waiting for his brain to register that Markeis had stopped moving. Markeis was in the process of turning away from Drejka when the gun was shot. I don’t think Markeis was in the right to shove Drejka and had Drejka slowed his panic, taken just a few seconds to analyze what was happening he would have realized he didn’t need to shoot. There were multiple witnesses, he could have called for help, Costelli was right there, and he could have called 911 and since it was all on video which Drejka knew already, he would have had a pretty solid case for assault. However, it’s my opinion that Drejka knew he had been told by the Store owner not to approach cars illegally parked, he knew he had already been involved in at least 5 separate incidents doing the exact same thing he just did, he knew wasn’t supposed to be approaching people and reprimanding them and he said as much in the February incident with Rick Kelly. He told police at that time “ he couldn’t help himself” from doing this. He admitted that reprimanding people for parking in Handicap spots was his “ hobby”. Drejka is another example of a white man with a gun actually creating the entire situation that caused him to feel the. Need to “ Stand his ground”. Like Michael Dunn, who yelled at 4 black teens to turn down their music , their “ thug” music , as he called it. An argument ensued that completely manufactured by Dunn, and he then shoots at the car 8 times because he “ felt threatened”. Then drove away, went to his hotel, ordered a pizza and made a stiff rum and coke, all the while never calling 911. The McMichels, in the Ahmaud Arbery case, they got guns, jumped into their trucks and tried to corral Arbery ( which is illegal detainment and kidnapping) and then when Arbery was shot by their shotgun it was because he was attacking them? George Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin in the dark rainy night, stalked him, and then when Trayvon tried to get Zimmerman to leave him alone, Zimmerman shot him and claimed self defense? So, my point is that in all of these cases and hundreds of others, the “ shooter” actually created the altercation and then claim self defense when the victim tried to “ stand their ground”. Drejka was a wannabe law enforcement officer who wasn’t one, he pulled a gun and killed a man ...had Drejka not been carrying a gun none of this would have happened, and I doubt he even would have gone up to Brittany in the first place. The gun gave him a false sense of courage.
11 likes@Paul Ok, "Verbaly Assailing", are you happy now? Not entirely sure what kind of point you're trying to make, you kind of look like a troll tbh.
10 likes@Peter Richard-Johnson 'Racist'? The only one who entangled race into this were you.
5 likes@Cj Looklin Odd, I remember typing a reply today, but it's gone. Anyway, yes, it's a thug move to shove someone so hard to the ground in that situation. I mean, anyone would be pissed seeing some asshole standing there yelling at your wife with your babies in the car, but you can't go broadsiding him like that. McGlockton would have been charged with assault and battery at least, and if he had seriously injured Drejka, which could easily have happened, felonies. As it turns out, he learned a lesson that when you overreact so violently, you never know when you've just provoked a sociopath with a gun. He only had a few moments to ponder his lesson, though, before his life was over.
2 likes@Paul It's exhausting dealing with you people, these will be my last responses. Michael was a dangerous pyscopath that seemed to get off on provoking people into confrontations that he himself started, then pulling his gun on them, waiting for a chance to gun them down. He has done this at least 5 times, (I say at least because not everyone files a police report), and all of his victims were black, hence the reasonable assumption he was a racist. You can believe he was not, but honestly it would take a lot more effort to prove otherwise. It seems you are more concerned that the 5th recorded individual, that is Mcglockton, was succesfully provoked into a violent altercation, than you are with the fact that this lunatic has repeatedly done this within his community. I can't discern your reasons for thinking this way, but I assume it's some combination of smug sophistry, Trolling, or infact being a racist yourself. Only your conscious can know the truth. As to me being a loon. I suppose my lunacy derives for me being better able to empathize with a man overreacting to a percieved threat to his family (Remeber, that this has occured many times, even within the same year, and it is possible that Markies had seen Michael pull a gun out on an unarmed black women before), than a man who is willing to kill someone over a parking spot. But, I shall have you know if that's the case then I take pride in being a "loon". Good day.
16 likes@beakt Yes, mcglockten overreacted and that was not smart. Emotion has a way of clowding ones judgement. I still don't understand your insistance on blaming the victim. Lastly, I'll direct you to my comment up above, incase you feel the need to engage further with me.
9 likes@Psalm If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it's probabaly a duck. This man has pulled his gun on many unarmed black men and women in this community. Quite frankly it's astounding to assume he his anything other than a racist and the burden of proof lies on you to prove otherwise. If you do manage to find proof he wasn't a racist I will be compelled enough to engage with you in further discussion.
10 likesIf that was true, why didn't the cops take the gun away from him?
0 likes@Jenny clark Ask the police, did you even watch the video? One of those 4 other people even testified. Do you think they'd let him Take the stand if he bullshiting? I guess the police were just willing to give hime the benefit of the doubt. There are plenty of articles on this subject
4 likesThe simple fact that the guy was clearly backing away the instant the gun was pulled when he was shot, that wasn't out of self-defense, he just wanted to shoot him in spite. There's not way to justify it, he did not handle his firearm in a responsible and level-headed manner and killed someone because of it.
11 likesI don’t get how you can defend this behavior , same type of people that are going to try and re-elect Trump
6 likes@Cj Looklin "Blaming the victim" is a loaded statement that doesn't aid discourse. It implies only one or the other can be wrong. Both were wrong in this case, Drejka far more wrong both for starting the confrontation and for shooting McGlockton without justification.
3 likes@Cj Looklin I wasn't vocalizing about Drejka at all, he labeled L Vader as a racist so I chipped in. It's not that hefty of a thing to interpret chap.
1 like@Paul That's overly harsh and rude.
3 likes@Bobby It was that the guy was on the ground, and the other guy was standing over him. He had a right to protect his life.
0 likes@Peter Richard-Johnson But legally he should not have answered a shout with a physical push.
0 likes@Unknown Chick You don't defend a shout by pushing a guy to the ground.
0 likes@Stan Yes it should.
0 likes@L Vader Yes, parking in the handicapped space is a big deal. Why do you think there is such a big fine on it?
0 likes@Cj Looklin Because the one who parked in the handicapped space is the one who started it. She should have been confronted, and just doing that is not assault.
0 likes@Burpo Stockings He HAD a reason. A thug had knocked him to the ground and was standing over him.
1 like@Trevor Awesomness He had reason to fear for his life. He was justified.
1 like@Peter Richard-Johnson Yes, he was justified in confronting the woman. There were many empty legal spots for her to park but she decides to park in the handicapped space? No, she should not have pushed him to the ground. The guy on the ground was justified in protecting his life or body from further assault.
0 likes@Jenny clark She was still in her vehicle and the engine was running. Legally she couldn't be ticketed or fined. However, notice how Michael parked his car in the middle of the parking lot, which is VERY ILLEGAL, in order to accost this women over her questionable, not illegal, idiling location. If he was so concerned about the law why didn't he take the time to legaly park his vehicle before getting out?
7 likes@Peter Richard-Johnson Yes I do understand that, but it had nothing to do with his guilt or innocence in this case. And no, parking in the handicapped space is not better.
0 likes@Cj Looklin Your are right about all that, but no matter how stupid the guy was acting, it has no bearing on his guilt or innocence in this case. Once a guy pushes you to the ground and is standing over you, you have a right to protect your life and body.
1 like@Jenny clark that's fine. Of course he had the right to defend himself, you coukd even argue that it was perfectly reasonable for him to pull out his sidearm, BUT he didn't have the right to KILL someone. What sane individual fear for their life after being pushed? I've had drunk man follow me out of a bar and punch me (for talking to his girl) he was much taller than me, did I have the right to kill him?
3 likes@Jenny clark I do have a permit by the way. But would never cary if I intended to drink.
2 likes@Peter Richard-Johnson What makes you think his life or body was not in danger? If I had just been knocked to the ground and someone was standing over me, I would think that more was probably coming, and I don't think he should have to wait until he was jumped and beaten. That's what the gun is for, to prevent him from being beaten or killed.
0 likesNo I am not saying that he was right to illegally park and yell at someone in the handicapped zone. He should have parked legally. But people who park in the handicap should be called out for it. I don't know if you are correct that it is ok if the motor is running. But really none of that is relevant. The only thing that is relevant is that the guy reacted to a verbal confrontation with physical assault and the guy had a right to protect himself from any more.
@Peter Richard-Johnson You shouldn't bother man. This guy is definitely a troll, there's no point in entertaining the peanut gallery.
2 likes@Peter Richard-Johnson The guy backed up after he saw the gun, but if the gun hadn't been there he probably would have been kicking the guy.
0 likes@Jenny clark maybe, if you look the video again, he was placing his hands on his waist (Thats a very awkward position to kick someone in) it seems more likely that now that the immediate threat to his wif was over, he'd wait to hear what michael had to say, then michael shot him.
2 likes@Cj Looklin Well in that position, in that tiny amount of time, the guy on the ground did not have time for that. He had to protect himself.
0 likes@Unknown Chick defending them from what? From being asked to move their car? Anyone who turns a verbal confrontation into a physical one should be taken out of the gene pool same with anyone who defends them.
0 likesProtect his family? There was nothing physical until he pushed him! I hate that what i think was possibly good man lost his life but im telling ya if im having a heated conversation and end up on my ass from someone out of sight i would also be very defensive! And the fact that he was retreating after that does not matter and if you think it does youve never been hit or treated unjustly!
0 likes@Jenny clark The dude backed up once weapon was drawn. There was no reason to fire. There was at least a solid 3 seconds before he fires AFTER he backs up. There was no reason to fire and no immediate threat. This was murder.
5 likes@AustenKY 77'Lt Well it does matter that he was retreating, but in that instant, in that moment of fear, the guy on the ground didn't have time to think about that and was just protecting himself. Yes, it is a tragedy. All involved acted like idiots, and a man with a family lost his life.
0 likes@Alec Serrano How do you know there were three seconds? The film was speeded up. Anyway, I think the guy on the ground did not know what he guy was going to do next, so he shot him.
0 likes@Cj Looklin well they did park in a disabled persons spot
0 likesFACTS he was purposefully trying to start fights
3 likes@jane kennedy She was in the vehicle and the engine was on. She was idiling, which isn't illegal. Micheal on the other hand illegaly parked his vehicle in the middle of the parking lot to start shit with a stranger.
4 likes@lizzie may you
0 likes@Bobby I am in no way shape or form saying Drejka isn't guilty, but why should anyone be expected to take an ass kicking rather than shoot? The victim in this case was definitely retreating after the gun was displayed. The shooter definitely initiated the conflict from the start and has zero reason to claim self-defense. It's just odd to me that gun owners are expected to take a beating rather than defend themselves with their gun. I'm not entirely sure from your comment, but you seem to be suggesting that you shouldn't be allowed to shoot someone if they are using less than lethal force. Why does anyone owe their attacker a defense only equal to the attack? Guns exist so that we don't have to engage in hand to hand combat.
1 likeAndy Tyler think I was misunderstood here. I am a gun owner myself and absolutely stand for mine, yours and everyone’s right to protect themselves and their loved ones with them, however, if once you draw your firearm, and the attacker ceases to attack and surrenders, maybe firing at them isn’t the best idea. Let the courts sort out the assault/battery charges, no reason to take it to the point of ending the surrendering persons life just because you got beaten up, especially in this case for not minding your own damn business. His kids now get to grow up without a father. I don’t think people realize just how valuable the soul is, extinguishing a human life should never be an easy decision imo.
1 likeMy Boring Adventures I want to start by saying I am not defending Drejkas actions here because he was wrong to of fired on the victim, however, let’s be rational here. Was it necessary for the victim to shove Drejka without engaging him first in conversation? No. Had things of likely not ended so tragically here had be not if shoved him immediately without first speaking to him, probably. I mean, Drejka wasn’t physically attacking the mans family, it was verbal. We use our words, diplomacy in America. Walking out of that store like some tough guy and shoving him to the ground was the wrong move, was it worth his life, no, it wasn’t. However, no, you’re wrong, he had no justification for engaging Drejka in violence, just as Drejka has no justification in using lethal force.
0 likes@Bobby I agree. My assumptions with my comment are that a gun owner is being attacked without provocation, and displaying the gun doesn't end the attack. Over and over, however, the fact that an unarmed person is shot is the main focus of high profile police shootings while disregarding every other fact. "Stand your ground" laws always cause controversy. When you said he was only pushed, it reminds me of so many other comments where the gun owner is criticized because he shot someone that was "just going to beat him up." It's truly bizarre logic to me. Even when we have footage of officers being punched, there's still a significant portion of the population that thinks it is wrong to shoot.
0 likesAbsolutely right!!!
2 likesHow did this guy NOT get arrested 5 incidents ago???
Jenny clark sure, by drawing his firearm, forcing the other man to surrender and run, which he did. He however did not have the right to shoot the man, who shoved him, in the back. There’s no honor in that.
2 likes@Bobby Let the games begin. lol. Maybe we can see my point illustrated in real time now. I have been called a racist SO many times for expressing the opinion that maybe fighting with armed people is a bad idea. Good luck buddy.
0 likesPeter Richard-Johnson not that he deserved to die, but he really should not of shoved Drejka, not that Drejka shouldn’t of minded his own damn business but the victim here did escalated it to violence by putting his hands and shoving him. Unfortunately he met another man who wanted violence, he had not predicted the other man however was armed and ready to kill. Most tragic for the kids who now have to grow up without a father, in my opinion.
2 likesNice to know if I shove you.. you won't retaliate 👍🏼
1 like@Cj Looklin nice to know I can use a "force multiplier" against you if I hear you yelling 👍🏼
0 likesName Withheld 🤣
0 likes@Name Withheld Hey, man if i piss you off and you start swinging, I'll swing right back. But, you can rest assured that It's unlikely that I'd ever pull out my Taurus on you unless you come at me with your boys or pull out your own piece 👌🏿
0 likes@Jenny clark Because it literally said 2.5 seconds in the video. Did you even watch this thing?
2 likes100%
0 likesThis!! 👍
1 likeThe point of this original comment above is that he has a history of pulling his gun on unarmed ppl. How many times can you pull a loaded gun on random strangers before someone gets hurt? The only sad thing is that he didn't pull his gun on someone who was also carrying and a better shot. This guy was a do nothing edgelord.
3 likesL Vader some random dude screams at your partner with your kids in the car u come out with no context I dont blame him for making space mabey words would have worked mabey not either way he didnt jump on him and start beating the shit out of him like a THUG (whatever that means to you ) the end of the day dude started the whole thing over petty bs and could've a got up left and called the cops if his pride /arm was hurt that bad
1 likeBut, he did get assaulted
0 likes@Peter Richard-Johnson nonsense...you don't get to assault people over words. That's nonsense and thuggish...
0 likesCj Looklin you are probably right. He is a male Karen who should have minded his own business. But the other guy put himself in the situation by assaulting this guy, thus giving this male Karen an excuse.
0 likesI feel for the kids that had to witness their father’s killing.
He was found to be in the wrong but 30 years? Harsh
2 likesIf somebody starts shouting and screaming and getting in your face or somebody you care about you may push them back its a natural reaction. Also Michael Drejka could be seen as the aggressor depending on the language he was using. it can take surprisingly little force to knock somebody over instead of just pushing them away. This guy from previous incidences was out to kill someone it was premeditated murder he was purposely doing it. 1 or 2 times maybe but 5 times in a row. His mistake was there was a camera there to prove it.
2 likesDid he really need to push him that hard? That’s a clean shoot!
0 likesSarah Pittard He was trying to be a hero and ended up the opposite.
0 likesL Vader stop perpetuating the mentality that black men are “thugs”. The victim saw a random stranger screaming and gesturing at his wife and reacted. Sure, pushing someone isn’t the mature thing to do- but it does NOT warrant being shot, let alone murdered in cold blood. How is Drejka not the thug for shooting at an unarmed man who pushed him once?
2 likes@L Vader Totally agree. Both did wrong and its a tragedy, but dont assault people, especially not from behind and you wont get shot...easy as that. And tbh a guy that assaults you from behind, isnt the most honorable, so I wouldnt know what he does next...
0 likesSpot on.
0 likesHis first mistake was talking to the police without a lawyer present he's pretty much talking himself into jail. And number two there's no law that says you have to let somebody beat you up or cause you bodily harm.. and number two if you don't want to get shot don't try to assault a random person at a gas station
0 likes@L Vader The guy was protecting his family. I can almost guarantee if the guy was white you wouldn't have used the word "thug" to describe the guy who pushed Drejka. Just the word thug insinuates violence. Noone should be killed for pushing a sensitive and insecure man. Gtfo here. 🤦♂️
2 likes@Paul Its the connotation of the word thug. It's been used to negatively portrait men of color for generations. Particularly associating black men as violent criminals. The gentleman was protecting his wife. Alot of people would argue protecting your wife would warrant far greater force than he used against his wife's aggressor. You cant start a confrontation get pushed then claim you were the victim.
1 likeHe's disabled so how did "dude illegally park"? Was he not in a designated parking spot? Everyone keeps saying that he illegally parked but how so? What's illegal about it & how did he deserve to be knocked to the ground. It didn't look like he was screaming.
0 likesThe only thing I see in the video that makes me see him as guilty is that the dude that knocked him down retreated on seeing the weapon come out.
Paul oh i bet you have a 3000 iq
0 likes@Diego He wasn't protecting his family. His family was in no immediate danger. They were safely inside a motor vehicle. And even if a motor vehicle isn't completely safe, it's still safer than out on the street. She had no reason to exit the vehicle. If you feel unsafe, what logic tells you to get closer to the threat? She was planning to confront Drejka when she could have ignored him, rolled her windows up, and locked her doors. This is not an excuse for Drejka's actions. This is more of a declaration that every party involved with this incident did not act in a sensible or intelligent manner. They all fucked up. Learn how to interact with people before you leave the house.
0 likesWho the hell is defending this guy?! The victim stepped back while the gun was pointed at him. That is extremely clear. There was no imminent threat to the suspect of bodily harm. Bullshit.
2 likesWhen the gun was drawn, the victim BACKED UP. WE SEE THIS. that immediately negates any justifiable manslaughter defense. Forget that the victim pushed the suspect. Forget that. The moment the suspect pulled his gun, the victim disengaged. End of altercation. Victim backed up. He got killed NOT because he pushed the suspect. He got killed because the suspect was committed for whatever reason to shoot the man who pushed him. It’s unjustifiable. Plain and simple. The victim would still be alive if the suspect hadn’t fired his gun when the victim backed up. End of.
1 like@L Vader Michael Drejka has 3 time before threatened to shoot some over for driving or parking disputes.
1 likeFacts
0 likes@L Vader cuz if a black man was the one who shot him it would have been a 1st degree murder
3 likes@L Vader watch wat you say
0 likesCj Looklin it’s O.K. he won’t be doing this again. Just listen to the way he sweetly explains how polite he was.
1 likeI was laughing at his lawyer when he said he is the real victim, and said the footage isn't that great either. Oh hell noo
1 like@Peter Richard-Johnson Instead of shoving him he should shown him the disabled parking permit. They were wrong to park on that spot and not display the permit. RIGHT???? And if they shouldn't have been parked there - then a simple sorry would have sufficed.
0 likes@Peter Richard-Johnson clearly you are not interested in defending disabled people right to have a parking spot, and ok if people use it even when there are other options. This is a common problem, and I guess you want the disabled to fight their own corner. But many of them cannot do so, and they do not have to beg for something as simple as that.
0 likeslegally you may be right. So law over the disabled ... right? sad
I guess you think those of us willing to stand up for the disabled ... its okay to push them to the floor? I don't think so.
Either show the permit.... or say sorry and move out. Don't get violent.
But even a violent guy did not deserved to be killed. And this man was clearly retreating, so the verdict was a good one.
@Peter Richard-Johnson Ok, apologies I shouldn't have assumed that. But my personal view is
0 likes1. that if there are other parking options available, then don't take up the DISABLED SPOT.
but if you accidentally do and
2. If someone checks whether you have a disabled permit, don't get violent and push.
That's my view. You seem to be too interested in saying... well technically no law of the land was broken. That's why I assumed the above.
Thanks for the conversation. Bye.
Yeah he straight up said he wouldn’t change anything about how he handled the situation so, in short, he ain’t shit.
1 like@L Vader I don't blame the victim at all. If we put ourselves in his position, he comes out of the store and some nut is yelling at his loved one. I think most people would've put hands on him just out of instinct to protect. Would a nice calm conversation have been nice? Sure. But this guy seems totally nuts and he's lucky he didn't get more than a shove. If some weirdo was circling my car, I'd feel incredibly threatened.
0 likesL Vader so a father protecting his wife and kids from a man by pushing him away is a thug !!? Wow your unbelievable
3 likes@Javiani Andino I'm gonna say it. I feel the only reason he got described as a "thug" is because he's black. Even if it was a white man and people still didn't like that he shoved someone, I don't think "thug" would've been used to describe him.
3 likesClaire Bee yess I total agree with you
0 likespeople who are defending him do so bc they don’t value Black lives. there is no trying to reason with them
3 likesI couldn't agree more
0 likestottaly what I thought he must have done this before at "his store"
0 likes@L Vader no more shoving people to ground for that fella
0 likes@Peter Richard-Johnson he used to be a shover. Not no more
0 likesI don't think I saw one person defending this guy. But yea I think we all agree
0 likesJust tossing in my 2 cents. The push was an assault but the shooting was not self defense either as the boyfriend backed away afterward, clearly disengaging. Yelling is not assault, as some are trying to say, so in no way was the push, especially of that level, warranted and that was a very hard push. Pushes that causes falls have been know to kill people unintentionally, or even cause brain damage, if the person happens to hit his head on the ground or other object.
0 likesWhat the boyfriend did was VERY bad and unjustified. He would have been arrested hands down if he'd lived and no amount horrible behavior on the other man's part will change that. DO NOT THINK ITS OK! DO NOT RAISE YOUR KIDS THINKING ITS OK! YOU WILL HAVE A VERY SAD LIFE FAR FROM YOUR FAMILY WHEN THEY NEED YOU!
@Paul Your last comment is evidence enough, the (not so) subtle racism is oozing out of it.
1 likeGenuinely dude, the amount of people calling you racist in this one corner of the internet should be even more evidence for you. You're just delusional. Or a troll. Either way, I'm looking forward to your next novel.
@Peter Richard-Johnson I agree totally, if some man was screaming at me when I had my kids in the car I would expect my husband to remove the threat. Why did he have a gun if he was just popping into the shop, this guy was also parked illegally and i believe he was itching to shoot someone. He apparently has threatened and pulled a gun before this murder. Some people need a psych evaluation before getting a weapon. Plus wtf is this negative instead of just no, does he think it makes him sound clever? What the hell does the quality of the colour in the CCTV? Why is colour necessary to hav colour
1 likeHe was pushed by a man that was not running towards him, not tackled by a man charging at him, if a man was screaming at me with my kids in the car I would hope my husband would remove the threat away from me. I think that race may have been hiding beneath the surface. The guy was carrying a gun to pop to the shop ffs who needs a gun to pick up some loo roll and munchies? The colour quality seems not as important as content! The other question is why doesnt Michael take a defensive shot rather than a kill shot?
2 likesExactly.
1 likeMeh, he was assaulted and defended himself. We should all do the same and maybe people will stop assaulting others... my $0.02
0 likes@lizzie may someone who assaults someone else from behind definitely falls under thug.
0 likes@Matt Phillips and if the ignorant woman hadn't parked in a handicapped spot it all could have been avoided, or had she moved when it was pointed out, or if the dead guy hadn't shoved him... i mean there were a lot of points where something and should have been done differently.
0 likesDiego since when is pushing someone to the ground after a discussion “protecting your family”.
0 likesStan n mom
0 likesMatthew Meyer ...I'll assume you are saying this about the gunman also. That anyone who escalates words to the physical should be removed from the gene pool? Don't forget he has pulled a gun on multiple unarmed ppl before this incident. Those are only the ones that we know about, which got reported to police. I'd say that's an insane variety of escalation every time you find yourself feeling uncomfortable about something. I doubt this happens more than once to most ppl, if at all. Clearly, this guy feels threatening excessive force is the answer in pretty much any situation.
2 likesJenny clark WRONG. He admitted himself if a person is retreating or even standing still there is no reason to aggress them.
1 like‘Malignant Narcissist’ is EXACTLY! Right!... exactly my thoughts.
0 likes👏👏👏👏 On point. The only thing I don’t agree with is that he shot him in a panic. It seemed to me he aimed, paused for a second or two and then shot. Had he shot as he was swinging the firearm I might agree. But it seemed like the gun was visible to everyone and that is why the victim turned to run. The shooter should have registered his retreat as he was seated and stationary, looking directly at the victim. It’s almost as if he was insulted by the retreat and thought, “ Oh no you don’t!” Your synopsis of the facts I feel are quite accurate. Thanks for the additional info also. It really does flesh out the details of what I feel was a racially motivated attack.
0 likesIf you are saying that words met with violence is an unnecessary escalation, you’ll also have to acknowledge that murder is an unnecessary escalation of physical violence.
1 likeI’m just gonna guess here.... but this happened in the USA correct?
1 likeActually Jenny, only a ‘thug’ repeatedly pulls guns on unarmed women and children. It was only a matter of time before Drejka’s gun killed someone the way he was constantly threatening ppl with it. I don’t have a dog in this fight, these are facts. If you refuse to acknowledge that Drejka had a history of manufacturing circumstances that justified his control of other ppl with a sidearm... you are CHOOSING willful ignorance.
2 likesBut what about random ppl who are armed and start random fights with you?? 🤷🏻♀️
1 likeJust pointing out that if you flip your own script the same can be said for Drejka. He is not a cop. He should not have verbally attacked a stranger and most importantly, should have minded his own business, as you suggest. ....and none of this would have happened. Please don’t disagree and make Canadians looks stupid.
1 likeYou’re assuming to know what would have happened if..
1 likeBut the fact is, pulling a gun on unarmed ppl is a hobby of Mr.Drejka. We can’t assume that time and again everyone would walk away unharmed when a gun is pulled at every provocation. When someone is this careless and gun happy ... ppl will be hurt. This was not a one-off incident. This man had serious issues.
@Ben Doverson No it fucking isn't, how can you even make an equivalent comparison between the two? Sheesh.
0 likesGun ownership 101: Don't pull a gun unless you plan on using it, this man had priors of pulling that gun, that day he finally used it. He put himself in a situation where it was a possibility to be able to use it, all he needed was an excuse. Most gun owners will never be in that situation, it's a safeguard, not a reason to start a confrontation.
2 likesHave You Heard Of The High Elves? He calls the guy a thug while active like Michael is some angel, he’s racist.
0 likesDeana Cagle but that’s not what happened. Did you watch the video? Honest question. After the weapon was pulled Marquis stands still for a second and then backs up two steps starting to turn away from McGlockton. He was not hovering over him, he was not charging towards him, he was retreating.
0 likesJenny clark so you admit Marquis was backing up and unlikely to engage in a physical confrontation because he saw the gun but...because he might have beat McGlockton up if he didn’t have a gun it’s ok he got shot and died?
1 like@L Vader act like a thug or stand up for his women and children? He parked illegally to see if someone was parked illegally to pace around her car and yell at her about being parked illegally... wtf do you expect. Just for him to walk down n scream at people and not get what he deserves.. a shove? He can scream at a women but the second he gets into a physical altercation he can't duke it out like a real man. Some people can't take a L. But at the end of the day someone died because someone didnt mind their business and children wont have a father to grow up with and a women with no man.
1 likeThis dude was waiting to use that firearm. He was chomping at the bit. He used tactical type words when talking to the cops, like it was just three public servants having a conversation. If he wasn't in the military, he wanted to be. If he was never a cop, he wanted to be. He wants to be an authority figure for all the wrong reasons.
1 likeL Vader no he acted like someone protecting their family, Michael acted like a thug, it’s already been spelled out for you. How about your step out of that racist viewpoint you have and start viewing situations for what they are
0 likesL Vader I know with 100% certainty if the skin colors were switched, your comment would have read “maybe if Michael wasn’t acting like a thug pulling up on that lady none of this would have happened.” “Marques was clearly just trying to defend his family from a thug.”
0 likesL Vader you wanna know how this actually wouldn’t have happened? This wouldn’t have happened if Michael wasn’t putting himself in situations where he thought he could get away with shooting someone.
0 likes@OgPage If you didn't see who pushed you, and you look up and see someone hovering over you, you don't know what he might do.
0 likesDeana Cagle he wasn’t hovering over him, he took three steps back and began to turn around. That’s why he was shot in his side. Did you not see the video? You can only shoot someone if your life is in immediate threat, an unarmed man backing away from you is not a threat especially when you have the gun. Why am I explaining this? Is this a difficult concept?
0 likesJenny clark you missed a glaring fact. The victim was backing away and turning around. He was no longer a threat and shot him anyway.
1 likeJenny clark Maybe, but that’s why you have a gun. He successfully used it to nullify the threat. But when the threat was over he fired anyway. When you shoot someone who is not a threat to you its just murder. You see that don’t you? Or are just trolling us?
0 likesJenny clark actually he did, you can see in the video of him training his firearm at him as he was backing away. Which means one he knew he was backing away.
0 likesMatthew Meyer okay so when you see a creep yelling and screaming at your girlfriend/wife and kids you’d run away? Nah, I think you’d probably man up and confront the guy. A real man protects his family, a coward shoots a man in the back.
0 likesJenny clark video has a time stamp... duh.
0 likesAndy Tyler use of firearms is to nullify immediate threats. If you fire at an unarmed person who is not a threat to you it’s murder, you understand that right? The proper course of action was to call the cops after he was pushed not to play judge, jury, and executioner.
0 likesAndy Tyler except he wasn’t attacked without provocation. He was yelling and screaming at a woman with children a confrontation which he started. He carries a gun and starts fights, why do you think he does this? The man was protecting his family, the coward shot him in the back.
1 likePaul pulling a gun in self defense wasn’t the issue here, you know that right? The irony.
0 likesPeoples KarmaSquad actually it’s the male Karen that started the whole thing so it’s him that put himself in that situation.
1 likeJacques Malan I’m sorry brother, when see a creep screaming and yelling at my wife with children pushing him away is not assault especially when he started the confrontation.
0 likes@Michael Manalang If I was in that position I would not be sure the guy was no longer a threat.
0 likesUberAV first he was not at the designated parking spot and second witnesses went in the store to tell the owner that the guy was back harassing people. This was his fifth time initiating confrontation with people and twice he pulled his gun out on two unarmed women.
2 likesRobert Laplante classic troll move... nice.
1 likeMSA if that was the story, but witnesses told a different story. Drejka was yelling at the woman with her children, the victim did not know what’s going on. He saw a man verbally assaulting his girlfriend with his children so he shoved him away. Maybe too hard but instead on pressing charges to the police he shot him.
2 likesOnba I think if you see a creepy man yelling at your wife and kids you would push him away too. The creep started the confrontation, you cannot say that he is also the victim.
1 likejohnmann not a random dude but a man yelling at his girlfriend with his children who started the confrontation. He was defending his family and only cowards shoot unarmed people in the back.
1 likeJohny Blitz it wasn’t a discussion, witnesses reported yelling and screaming from Drejka. Also, this was not the first time he’s done this. He carries a firearm and starts confrontation with people, why do you think he does that?
2 likesJenny clark except he wasn’t hovering over him, he was backing up when he pulled the gun. Also, he carries a gun and starts fights (this is the 5th time he’s done this) why do you think he does this?
2 likesJenny clark uh right, he was no longer a threat and shot him anyway so we agree it’s murder. Cool.
1 like@Stan keep your hands to yourself
0 likes@Novascotia Skater good read but next time sort long comments into paragraphs lol was hard to keep up.
0 likesL Vader is thug is a racially charged word imo
0 likesThank you. I cant believe theres people defending a murderer.
2 likesNone of which justifies the violence against him, and the man was clearly going to commit further violence upon him.
0 likes@Conservative Copwatch We have different definitions of "cleary". In the video, after pushing Michael to the ground, Markies takes one step further and puts his hands on his hips. How is that "Clearly" a sign of further violence?
1 likeI wonder if all of the people in this comment thread saying he was acting like a thug would be saying that if this was an incident that happened between two white guys. My guess is probably not. He was backing away before he was shot, there's no justification for that.
1 like@Bobby I agree with you but lets be clear that being pushed to the ground 'can' be lethal. You only have to smash your head if you have poor mobility or balance, or other medical issues. But quite clearly the guy with the gun was looking for an opportunity to kill someone. He was probably bullied a lot as a child and was looking for some twisted revenge. Look what happened to that Buffalo man who was 75 - pushed by Police. I know he survived but it was very serious.
1 likeCj Looklin I completely agree with you. This guy was looking for trouble. Anyone gives me shit or gets heavy with me, I'm going to blow them away. He is going out looking for that situation.
1 like@Cj Looklin I don't know what got said in that parking lot. Both men in my opinion used excessive force. The shooting victim should not have pushed the other man to the ground in the first place. But the other guy should not have shot him. I think it was unnecessary, I think he was acting on temper rather than fearing for his life. Watch the police interview and the prosecution and defense arguments in court aswell as this video. Who takes a hand gun with them to the store and purposely looks for a argument? Knowing full well that things will get heated and no one will back down. Also I think this guy has a history of doing this sort of thing. A car parking space? That didn't effect him in anyway. It's not like he saw some people beating a old person up or vandalizing something. He was looking for confrontation.
0 likes@L Vader Yeah defending your family from someone who has no business being in their face is being a thug. Just say you're a racist and move on
1 like@L Vader how is he acting like a thug?? The guy notices a stranger yelling at his girl and comes to her defence.
1 like@L Vader Or the guy who shot him could have left the woman alone and gone in the store. Don't get the South Side of Chicago reference
2 likeslizzie may ppl use thug to say black ppl
0 likesJenny clark so forget this guy has done this 4 other times
0 likesBobby Reports yes just like he verbal abuse an waves his gun at 4 other damn ppl
0 likes@L Vader "well, he was assaulted first" not justification for homicide. getting pushed down to the ground is different then being grounded and pounded.
0 likessounds about right...
0 likesPeople saying that it's alright to attack someone over words, how many times have you beat up your family members then? Or workmates? Everyone acts like they are a tough guy, but try this in person, then let us know how it works out. Nothing good will come of it.
0 likesNovascotia Skater stopped reading after you said a push was too fucking much. It’s a push on the floor. boohoo, get up.
0 likes@L Vader a thug?? Is that bc he is black? Poor choice of words you could’ve kept that to yourself.
0 likes@IAmAutumn It does not justify killing him for revenge. He had a reason to believe his life was in danger.
0 likesHaving 5 prior incident of pulling a gun and not firing shows he's always had good restraint until the day he though his life was in danger.
0 likes**This guys step dad was in the military for 20 years.
1374 likes**He was in ROTC all four years of high school.
**He sets his clock in military time and uses words like “copy that” or “roger that”.
**After 17 attempts he finally passed the ASVAB and joined the military.
**He made it a month into bootcamp before getting discharged for failure to adapt, blames it in a back injury and calls himself a veteran.
Those are the vibes I’m getting.
Replies (54)
Perfect description
44 likesComes home, tries to get a job as a police officer or security guard. Isn’t hired anywhere. Decides he’s just a retired veteran that protects his neighborhood
179 likesOMG ! That was the best☆ comment ever on YouTube
16 likesYou will thank him for his service!
12 likesAbsolutely you can by the way he talks to cops. He sees himself as there equal. One of the good ole boys.
48 likesIt's negligent of anyone carrying a firearm to be a vigilante or hell, just get into any negative interaction. It's having an ace up your sleeve, except when it's revealed the other party dies. It's a fucked up loophole I'm sure thousands have been murdered under in the name of 'self-defense'
22 likesTHANK GOD FOR CAMERAS
"Affirmative."
5 likesImma push that guy and cry if he responds evenly unproportional as I did.
0 likes+Valencia Williams
4 likesSorry I'm a bit confused. Are those facts you've learned about his life, or are you speculating?
Because 'Those are the vibes I'm getting.' Could be read two ways as 'here are some facts, and he naturally gives off those vibes' or 'This guy gives off vibes like someone who has had this sort of theoretical chequered history.'
@BODHI lol this is self defense. dont attack people if you dont wanna get shot the concept is simple. drejka got manslaughter if the guy didnt push him drejka wouldve got murder and something crazy
4 likesMichael dredjka sentencing
0 likesHis specialization is escalating minor victimless bylaw infractions into murder. Callsign Private Pindick
8 likesWe all know this guy. Unfortunately
9 likesPerfect perfect description
1 likeLmao im sitting here reading this like, it all makes so much sense.
2 likesWhen you only know Control + C but not Control + V
0 likes@Kylie Andrea you’re the damn cherry on top 😂😂😂
1 like**eats fried chicken
4 likes**father in prison
**on welfare
those are the vibes I'm getting
Lol. I'm retired navy, in Hawaii I was moving into my apartment after deployment just ending. I remember nothing, I was put in a coma by getting assaulted and my right arm is paralyzed and hand doesn't work. Getting assaulted, even though he instigated you never know what can happen. He only shot once, and again I think taking aim without shooting of stopped it. If he still approached then go head. But he discharged kind of early.
2 likesmilitary time is not a thing. time is time.
1 like@BODHI God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)
0 likesI get the vibe that he called somebody out for parking in a spot they shouldn't have been and then a bully came over and blind sided him.
3 likesMore than one person was in the wrong that day.
r/Gatekeeping
0 likes@Brandy Harding he could call the freakin cops if he's sooooo worried about illegal parking (while parking illegally himself), instead of taking it upon himself to be some kind of aggro vigilante. He was accosting the woman, and the victim was defending his wife.
7 likes@Petru It’s a huge pain in this ass.
1 like@Brandy Harding No one rejects that. You just can't put a corpse on trial. If Drejka hadn't shot him, then Drejka would have been free and McGlockton would have been on trial for assault. That doesn't absolve Drejka of killing a man who was obviously trying to retreat. Any firearm owner should be aware of this simple rule.
7 likesDon't knock 24 hour time. It is an immensely useful system for communicating time. The /entire/ federal government uses it. The computer science world lives by it, as well. Copy that and roger that are just fun to say.
2 likesHaving said that, everything else you said I agree with the implicit accusation that he was in the midst of some law enforcement or military fantasy.
What is ROTC?
0 likes@hohoho hehehe Reserve Officers' Training Corps
1 like@Shimrra I’m retired military and still HATE military time.
0 likesi passed an ASVAB practice test a recruiter sent me and i spent about 5 seconds on each problem. skipped over the engine parts and scored so high he wouldn’t stop calling me for almost a year. Shits RIDICULOUSLY easy.
3 likesdidn’t end up joining cuz it was always a last resort option, and i got a job that pays well and offers free college like a month after i spoke to the recruiter. Also found out it’s an 8 year contract not a 4 year and that shook me a bit to how serious the commitment was gunna be. I’m fine with signing 4/5 years of my life away to serve but almost a decade? nah that ain’t for me.
2 likesWhat's wrong with 24-hour time?
0 likes@Shimrra and if the Drejka didn’t have a gun he would of been head stomped, not saying he had to shot but the aggressor didn’t back down from his assault until seeing the gun.
5 likes@Clown World Resident "and if the Drejka didn’t have a gun he would of been head stomped" Possibly not probably.
6 likes"not saying he had to shot but the aggressor didn’t back down from his assault until seeing the gun." It can certainly be argued that he shoved the guy and then did not press the attack further before he saw the gun. He was just holding his ground until he saw the gun, at which point he began to retreat. Yes, Drejka could have pulled the weapon and used the threat of it to escape. However, he still was the aggressor of the whole situation and /any/ use of a gun, at that point, is going to end up with a brandishing charge.
Drejka was a fool for getting into an argument. Any sane concealed carrier knows to /never/ instigate an altercation. Once you instigate, you lose much of your rights to self-defense claims.
*Thug’s Dad left him before birth. His step dad was in prison for 20 years.
1 like**He stole wallets and dropped out of high school.
**He has a fake bling watch and doesn’t know what military time is.
**After 17 attempts, he finally won $5 on a scrather ticket.
*^He made it a month in middle school before getting kicked out for stealing wallets.
**He was on “disability” for “anxiety” like his entire family.
These are the vibes that I am getting.
Can’t pass the ASVAB, it only determines placement in the army.
1 like@Joseph Dale You really think you did something
0 likesHow tf does one fail the asvab
0 likes@paul p how would u approach a racist who os accosting ur family?
2 likes@L.Q's Black Life Matters unfortunately you cant steal or park in a handicap spot then cry racism if someone of a different race "accosts" you for doing something illegal. as far as racists are concerned, black lives matter is a black supremacist organization who hypocritically believe the KKK is immoral for doing the exact same things they do, several nba players have used the term whiteboy, and beyonce released a movie called black is king (referring to black race) all in 2020. that said racism is freedom of speech/freedom of beliefs. if you want to hate on a race, gender, religion, disability, etc you can as long as you dont attack them, rob them, etc. unfortunately you can accost whoever you want for whatever reasno you want, especially if theyre doing something illegal
0 likesSpot on.
0 likes@Paddy Mc Not facts. He's using it as a metaphor to describe him.
1 likeWhat is the average number of tries to pass the ASVAB?
0 likes@T. B. one
2 likes@paul p yes u can. He targeted her cuz hes racist. No other reason.
1 likeHe has a history of targeting women of color with their children.
@Brandy Harding yeah, one person pushed a guy, another person murdered someone. Both are in the wrong. Lol how evil.
1 likeRoger that
0 likes@dead yami imagine being offended at all lives matter but saying "black is king" or black lives matter is somehow okay this is laughable we live in a messed up world it seems where people will literally say a white man insulting, robbing ir killing a black man is evil and racist but a black man doing the same things to a white man is somehow not wrong
0 likesThis guys taking up way to much air
0 likesmilitary time is actually quite common... where i live we dont even use that AM PM bullshit
0 likesLmao I bet he is a volunteer firefighter.🤣🚒🚒🔥
0 likesLmao @ some of these responses. I was a recruiter for 4 years and yes you can technically fail the asvab. 35 and above is typically passing and anything above 50 is considered upper mental group.
0 likes@matthew radabaugh dude I recruited for the navy for 5 years. You take the test, and if you don’t get a certain score you cannot join. So, while it is still a “placement test” you aren’t joining if you don’t make that score. You know…like a pass or fail…
0 likesI didn’t even realize how much this guy was in the wrong until i noticed how many steps the victim took to get away from him. like he was trying to get away and he still got shot. may his soul rest easy tho
1886 likesReplies (168)
I kinda thought he was wrong from the beginning. He said he guy pushed him and nothing else. There was no threat of death or major bodily harm.
188 likes@DankEngine like bro was in the wrong when he illegally parked and then wanted to harass somebody else about parking in the handicap space
176 likes@Boba MacLeod - That is also fair lol
11 likesLol
1 like@Micheal Linne exactly
9 likes@Micheal Linne bro having a gun or being disabled doesn't give him a right to start some shit and then shoot when the shit escalates. If you start it and it escalates to the point you gotta shoot you are 100% at fault
133 likesat 2:29 the gun is pulled and you see the victim start to step backwards and away, at 2:31 the shot is fired. Only a few seconds but you can see that the victim was clearly trying to retreat from the situation before he was shot. There was no present threat when the gun was fired.
74 likes@Enter the Abyss that's where you're wrong. Confronting someone isn't illegal and even if he had been provoking violence by saying racial expletives it still would have been self defense so long as he didn't start that altercation with violence or a serious and inherently dangerous crime. The violence started when that man pushed a disabled man off his feet essentially for confronting his wife about a crime they were committing and it wasn't just none of this man's business because it was a crime that directly effected him as he was disabled and when people so nonchalantly park illegally in those disabled parking spaces they are taking those spaces from people who need them.
24 likesI never once said having a gun gives you the right to shoot nor did I say being disabled did. What I did say was it's not like this guy had his back to this man, he had one foot towards him and was facing towards him, there was no way to know in my opinion if that guy was going to try to continue beating this disabled man or actually turn away and run until after he'd already been shot but when your attacker is that close it's easy to see why you'd be in a mindset of I either shoot or I risk this continuing and getting beaten to death.
@Sleepy Frog he stopped stepping back and did take a step closer while facing this man
3 likes@Micheal Linne Dude gets pushed over, pulls a gun, doesn't take enough time to assess the situation, (didn't even look at the guys hands or face,) kills someone who was moving away.
53 likes@Micheal Linne you are arguing eith idiots. They seem to be so confident in a broken “justice system”. Clearly they dont realize you in fact guilty til proven innocent
5 likes@Lewis McCombe you don't have that time to take. He was facing him and did take a step forward in that video in my opinion. It doesn't matter if someone took 2 steps back right before, that happens in fights all the time but as soon as he took that leading step forward and was facing him that was enough to honestly believe he was in a fighting position and was going to beat that disabled man right there.
6 likesPeople talk about the 21 foot rule and mention it's meant for knife wielders but that man was considerably closer, was essentially within 5 feet and within plenty of range to lunge and kick that man and start a struggle over the gun which could have easily ended in the disabled man's death. You can't wait for the lunge, as soon as that man took that step forward, even if he took 2 steps back first, he was a threat and that's exactly when he was shot and that disabled man had just barely got his bearings and hold on the gun not giving him enough time to have even seen that man take 2 steps back.
@0xbowman yeah, especially when it comes to self defense.
2 likes@Micheal Linne also very true
1 like@Micheal Linne all I can say is watch the video .. it completely lays your argument to rest. And for the record.. this “disabled” man is not visibly disabled so no one would know that unless he told them
34 likes@Micheal Linne at the beginning of the Interrogation the detective asks if the handicap spot being occupied effects the suspect and he says “if my mother in law pulled into the parking lot then yes” and he never said anything about being disabled so I dont know where you got that from? Clearly the family shouldnt have parked in the handicap spot but the man did not need to harass the woman in the car about it. He initiated an argument when he could have just made a report to the police instead.
40 likes@Jude L I'm not sure he initiated it. I don't know if you can tell but I definitely couldn't tell when that window came down so who talked to who first is up in the air in my opinion. The only thing we know is that his testimony that she rolled down her window and talked to him first was contested in court and I actually think this video takes a biased view in that woman's favor because even though it wasn't something that was established the narrator spoke as though it was established he had spoken to her first. It could have very easily ended with him taking pictures of the license plate and the handicap parking spot in my opinion especially if she was the one to call out to him and not the other way around but also even if he had talked to her first, it's no more inherently dangerous than seeing someone shoplifting and calling them out on it. Being shoved to the ground from behind definitely wasn't foreseeable especially since it didn't even look like a heated argument or anything. I still think it should be self defense
1 likeHe didn’t even have a weapon, and a step to the side is no reason to kill a man.
9 likes@Micheal Linne In the video, you can see before he walks toward the driver window he stands in front of the car and seems to be gesturing and speaking. Its true, you cant be 100% sure who was the first to speak to the other but its easy to conclude that the man initiated the argument by parking (illegally, also) and walking around the womans car. The victum shouldn’t have started a physical fight but the suspect didn’t have to use excessive force. Its obvious that once the suspect pulled out the gun the victum immediately backed away, but the suspect still shot him. The suspect also did not state that he felt his life was in danger, he just thought he was going to be beaten and shot the man to “save his own ass” as he puts it. The suspect didnt shot in fear for his life, therefore it is not self defense.
15 likes@WAFFLE123 nobody is getting educated to use excessive force. They are taught that if your life is in danger defend yourself.
2 likes@Jude L what he stated is a verbal threat against his life was never made. He never once said he felt secure that his life was not in danger, he said he was saving his ass and he thought he was facing getting kicked and beaten which kicking someone is deadly force btw, it is very easy to kill someone from kicking them.
2 likes@Finite Automata that is only from our perspective with the camera and still he was facing the man and stepped with his leg towards him in the video. And there's no way someone could have seen from the ground like that the direction his foot was facing so there's no way he could have known if it was turning to get away or turning to fight him. The camera gives you a privileged and biased view that he simply didn't have. That could have easily been seen as a step towards him and I think a lot of people would have made the same exact conclusion in fear for their life after being ambushed like that. This man probably isn't thinking at that moment that the guy that violently attacked him out of nowhere is going to run away especially if he moved his leg and hips in that man's direction like that.
1 like@Micheal Linne thats true, but the surveillance footage clearly shows that the victim had no intention of further harming the suspect. He took three steps back as soon as the suspect reached for the gun and was turning to leave when the suspect shot. I don’t see how anyone could believe their life was in danger from a person who is turning to walk away from them. The suspect says that from the time he took out his gun and shot it was a split second, but there is at least a 2.5 second interval where the suspect has his gun trained on the victim before he shoots. During this tome, the victum is actively retreating. You could argue all day long that the suspect was so distraught that he couldn’t think straight enough to see that the victim was backing away, but he obviously was able to think straight enough to pull out his gun, aim, and kill this man.
9 likes@Finite Automata and you make that determination from a privileged point of view. Its skewed from being both after the fact and a much better point of view. People who hesitate die and from that man's point of view he did step towards him. You assume that man could somehow know that leg going towards him while his torso and head remained completely pointed towards him was just rotating so he could turn around but there is no way he could have known that especially when laying on the ground on his side aiming up over his back and unable to see his feet.
0 likesIf you think that if someone who just shoved you to the ground from behind who as far as you can see is stepping in to attack you may not be attacking you and you should take the extra second to make sure than you are already being kicked and grappled and you are already fighting over your gun. If there is any sign they are coming in to attack you, you do not hesitate. It is you or them until you know otherwise and not the otherway around unless you would willingly die just to be sure you don't accidentally kill someone who attacked you and may or may not be trying to continue their assault.
Bro he literally slammed him into the ground the black guy was like a foot taller than him and had 60 pounds on him, he felt that his life was threatened so he shot. I guarantee that the black guy would have beat him further on the ground
2 likes@Micheal Linne I base it on your illogical comments and denial of reality.
8 likes@Jude L he didn't have his gun out for 2.5s. It took 2.5s from the time he reached for his gun until he fired it. 95% of that time was getting the gun out and aiming in his general direction
1 like@Sean O except he wasn't really yelling at a woman and her child, her kid was inside the store first of all and we're given no indication of shouting whatsoever. Again we disagree, that doesn't make you right, you're still not considering that his point of view is way worse than ours. I think from his point of view it would have looked like he was coming in to attack again
0 likes@Micheal Linne He was backing up. End of story. He was rightfully convicted because of that. You're tilting at windmills
10 likes@Finite Automata there is no such thing as shooting to disable or disarm. When you have to shoot someone you shoot to kill or you fail to hit them. You don't have the right to defend yourself in other countries, also, this has nothing to do with stand your ground laws, which remove the duty to retreat, because if you cannot get away you don't have a duty to retreat in the first place and he was on the ground aiming up at his attacker. Again you say he was retreating but you have a privileged point of view and self defense must only be seen as necessary from their point of view not the bystanders. If he could reasonably think that he was about to be attacked from his point of view, and he could, it would've looked like a step towards him from his point of view, then it should be self defense. The reason he was convicted is because people think he had enough time and a big enough field of view to determine his attacker was backing away but what they don't consider is that their point of view isn't his point view and that the 2.5s it took to draw the gun and shoot was 2 seconds of pulling it, half a second of aiming and seeing this man step towards him and a single moment of pulling the trigger.
2 likes@Finite Automata also that "step to the side" was behind this guys back that he had to aim over and getting behind an armed person is exactly how someone who is about to rush you and wrestle your gun out of your hands to shoot you will choose to approach you.
0 likesHindsight is 20/20, try saying that while you've just been pushed into the ground probably in atleast a slight daze.
0 likes@Jude L It's a pet peeve. He goes there everyday, and sees it everyday. Telling someone to move shouldn't be a problem regardless.
2 likes@Finite Automata And in "no other country" will you get shoved into the ground for telling someone to move away from a handicap spot either. Regardless of the verbal confrontation the man was having with the woman, shoving him into the ground for no other apparant reason than that is clearly very wrong
0 likesLol you must be misinformed. It was clear he was wrong from the gate. ONCE SOMEONE STOPS BEING A THREAT YOU CAN NOT SHOT THEM!!!! Then claim self defense.
2 likes@Enter the Abyss only person starting stuff was the thug that pushed the guy down
1 like@Sleepy Frog false he made a jerk toward the guy prior to the shot.
0 likes@Finite Automata false it is 100% acceptable to shoot if you feel threatened. That is how the law works.
1 like@Micheal Linne it seemed to me that it was 50/50 until the end where you find out he threatened people with his gun regularly. He was someone looking to use that gun.
3 likes@Finite Automata killing somebody is life altering, and probably the most stressful thing imaginable, or one of. To me the average person, would want to avoid that senrio at all cost. I aslo wouldn't seek confrantations with people knowing I'm strapped, . I'd avoid that too.
3 likes@Finite Automata they probably give sympathy for school shooters, as long as they've been bullied. Because clearly assault (without a threat to your life) is clearly an excuse to kill someone/s
2 likes@Micheal Linne the fact that he was shot in the side means he wasn’t facing Michael when he shot him.
5 likesThat’s all you need to know.
Stop talking.
@Enter the Abyss He didnt say he wasnt at fault, he said the guy that got shot was also in the wrong, which he 100% was. he ASSAULTED a DISABLED PERSON
1 like@ментыdestroyer good bait
1 like@Micheal Linne did you watch the video? The victim had three children. Oh, wait you're just here to be offended for, and defending someone being charged with manslaughter
4 likes@Micheal Linne Oh yes, please, defend the guy who murdered a man in front of his family and then got off on a charge lighter than murder.
4 likesSmallest violin for the killer.
@Micheal Linne It wasn't self defense to shoot a man because he shoved him.
2 likes@Vilesentry and you had to make it about race even though literally no one else suggested it was racially motivated. That says more about you than this man
1 like@Dawn Miskar I apparently didn't catch that part but that changes the entire context if that was in fact true.
0 likes@Micheal Linne He was not disabled and also parking illegally.
1 like@Hooyahfish he was still facing him and he still stepped closer, especially from his viewpoint. We disagree about this let it go
0 likes@Richard Morrow what part about this makes it racist?
1 like@Storm™ I didn't see the other two, my bad. I'm not offended by your view on this, you're offended by mine
0 likes@Vilesentry we disagree, get over it. I think it was reasonable self defense, you think it was cold-blooded and calculated. At worst he made a mistake in my opinion.
0 likes@Micheal Linne “you’re offended by mine” you’re shocked people aren’t peachy with you defending a murderer who instigated a confrontation, harassing a mother with children and then unlawfully abusing his legal weapon? the law isn’t even on your side.
2 likesyeah. if he hadn't moved back, or actually took a step while the gun was out it would be different. But the step towards him was just before drawing the weapon - which in Michaels mind must have happened at the same time as he confused trying to take his gun out.
1 likeSo if he was looking for oppurtunity to use his gun, or maybe wasn't as steady in a stressful situation as a gun owner really should be - I cannot judge. But he should not have shot him - the drawing seemed enough, otherwise a warning shot seems to have been quite enough even if Michael was extremely startled, confused and stressed in the situation. Just imho.
@Micheal Linne We have no confirmation of the disabilities of the child or the disabilities of the wife and/or husband who was shot dead. I don't believe that it's fair to assume that they are physically threatening considering that the guy was shoved for being pissy about a parking-space when we don't know anything about the others.
0 likes@Micheal Linne it said only said one child came out the car so that means 2 or 3 kids were still
0 likesin the car by the time the mom was in the car?
@Micheal Linne if he was facing him, how did the bullet enter from the side? Hmm? 🤔
1 like@brit instigated how? By confronting someone, who talked to him first btw, for being a deuchebag and parking in a handicap zone?
1 likeHe wasn't yelling at them, he wasn't kicking the car or threatening them or calling them names, he was blindsided from behind, thrown to the ground and as he's pulling his gun out his attacker is stepping behind him and what easily appears to be in his direction and keeping his torso faced towards him and he shoots the guy that easily appears to be stepping towards him especially if you consider he was on the ground at this point, has to aim over his back as he's on his side and can only see the legs and upwards of this man that just attacked him. I think if you saw this from this man's point of view it would have looked like a step towards him to you. We can't help that he couldn't see from a good angle and couldn't see this man's feet.
@End My Suffering Please except they didn't have placards and as far as we know he was just going to report them to the police until he was attacked. People illegally parking in disabled parking is despicable and should be reported every time.
1 like@Micheal Linne the victim walked away . There is no way to see someone walking away from you as walking towards you, it is literally the opposite direction. The shooter isn’t disabled, your arguments are flawed and bias. You appear to be grasping at straws.
1 like@Micheal Linne report it to the police or the store owners, no reason to go up to the car and take pictures like that and be confrontational.
0 likes@Finite Automata Wow, look who's overgeneralizing an entire people and culture.
0 likes@Hooyahfish it didn't, it entered from the front left side of this guy's abdomen, it was more front than side and again he put a leg towards him, that's the angle that you expect in that situation.
0 likesWow, At first I was on the fence but you made me go back and oh my god, he was totally backing away after he pulled the gun. There were at least a couple seconds of little danger and he still shot him. What a worthless human being.
1 like@Micheal Linne meh. Whatever you say big guy. You need glasses. The video shows a different story.
2 likes@Micheal Linne Man Idc what you say... you're still defending a murderer. Both were in the wrong and one got completely out of line. Period.
3 likes@Micheal Linne was he disabled?
1 likeYeah ...trying to get away why he already pushed him to the ground....he could have hit his head on the concrete...
0 likes@Enter the Abyss As much as I believe he was in the wrong, I strongly disagree with your statement "If you start it and it escalates to the point you gotta shoot you are 100% at fault"
1 likeIf I were to, hypothetically, complain to my neighbor about his mulberry tree making a mess on my lawn and he escalated the situation to potentially fatal violence, I would absolutely not be at fault to respond in turn.
@Micheal Linne Confronting maybe not. Verbally abusing however. Fighting words often kills any self-defense claim because that IS in fact starting the incident.
0 likes@The Seeker except he doesn't get shot until after he takes a step behind and towards him
0 likes@Finite Automata you mean the country that less than half the population controls and has controlled consistently for the last 50 years and has somehow been able to blame their mistakes on the rest of us like they weren't the ones pushing the bills that have financially ruined this country and also pushed mass incarceration? The country where when one side cheats it never gets investigated because they control both the media and all the major government bodies like the fbi, Cia, and homeland security? Guess what? I'm not on that side and I'm definitely not happy about it. The rest of us believe in individual freedom so we can free ourselves of tyranny if we need to. The biggest reason the other side is able to control us so much is because they don't believe individual freedom is important nor do they believe tyranny is a bad thing. They believe they need to babysit and force their viewpoints on everybody else to get their perfect society and they try their best to accomplish it.
0 likes@sean ajolo I thought so at first but now its unclear. He said something about what if his step mom was there according to someone else. But even if he wasn't disabled, calling someone out on doing something as deuchy as parking in a disabled parking space doesn't warrant a violent ambush and the question of self defense comes after.
0 likes@KuariThunderclaw what verbal abuse did he throw though? We didn't see any of that. He didn't even talk to her until she talked to him first.
0 likesWow you sure do enjoy running your mouth. Problem is, you don’t understand what “imminent threat” means. It is not some subjective thing that yo get to decide on, it’s a threat that must be real, not simply perceived, and would occur in an immediate time frame, and the most important part, “could result in death or serious bodily harm.” This legal definition is quite narrow, and all criteria must be met, not just one or two. People like you keep spreading this false narrative that if you catch a burglar in your home you have the right to shoot them. You confuse duty to retreat with criteria to imminent threat. If the burglar surrenders and is no longer an imminent threat, you can’t shoot them unless they do something to again become an imminent threat. And I really don’t know why you’re on here arguing with every single person. Doesn’t make me very confident that you understand law very well.
1 like@Micheal Linne So like, I'm not going to come into this trying to actually argue against your points, because you've made your stubbornness concerning where you stand on the matter extremely clear.
1 likeBut just fucking imagine actually defending someone who shot an unarmed person. It doesn't fucking matter who started it, it doesn't fucking matter if the person who shoved him down was going to start beating him up, you don't just pull a glock on someone and open fire. You're literally escalating the confrontation for no reason.
I will say that the person who shoved him shouldn't have done so. That was wrong. But the fact that his response in any capacity is to just pull out a gun and shoot a bullet into the victim is just wrong on so many levels. I hope he had his license to carry revoked(if he even had one in the first place) and his firearm(s) confiscated.
I just find the fact that you're actually defending this guy sickening.
@Micheal Linne the killer was NOT disabled . Any "self defense is required to be reasonable and proportionate.. frankly the killer started it from starting a shouting match with his victim's wife.
1 like@NeoSaurfang at this point the wife had just got out the car, , the husband saw a fat stranger harassing his wife, , ➡️ in most places the guy would have been pushed away from any man's wife.
0 likes@Micheal Linne no, I also carry my FMK 9mm on me always everywhere and when you carry, you do not start a conflict, confrontation, arguments ect. He should have just went in and told the store manager and let them handle it from there. When you carry a gun you must know where the very very thin line between self defense and murder is, and you can see it in the video. When the victim took two steps back and not forward, he was showing he no longer was a deadly threat, now should he had pushed him NO, but all this could have been avoided, if the shooter did believe he had the right to confront the woman and escalated the situation.
0 likes@ментыdestroyer Pulling the gun isn't the problem. And if he had shot while the guy was still coming forward, I doubt he would have been convicted. But he didn't. He waited until the guy was backing away and then shot him. That isn't self defense, by definition.
1 likeDid you catch the part where Drejka had, in the past, threatened other drivers during road rage incidents with his gun (including a woman with kids in her car)? Wonder how he justified that to himself. Other people in this thread can make all the unfounded excuses for him that they want, but your comment shows that you see the picture clearly.
1 likeHe was standing over him being a thug when he shot him. Then ran away after he'd been shot. He wouldn't have run off otherwise, he would have stayed there to stomp him out.
0 likesYour right. Unarmed and in the interview he cited the only thing he noticed was the man was black.
0 likesVictim? You mean the guy who assaulted him and provoked the entire situation/ Go to hell.
0 likesHe just had to take the gun out he didn't have to fire it. come on
1 like@Micheal Linne Na it was clear from the footage there was plenty of time between when the man was pushed to where he was shot and he was clearly standing or retreating. Not following up and attacking
0 likesyea he was physically in the wrong but its hard to know what he was actually thinking. Its possible he just wasnt thinking right since he had just hit the ground.
0 likes@Micheal Linne you make a lot of assumptions. I'm not offended, I'm arguing for justice. I don't believe this was racially motivated, although the confrontation with the mother, before the shooting, was instigated by him as he was the individual whom came up to another individuals vehicle and proceeded to circle it and then wait around until noticed and asked why he was there.
0 likes@Iridium Apple Absolutely. Just say "what's the problem bro?"
0 likesHot head 1 turned it into a fight, and hot head 2 murdered him.
Don't be a hot head kids.
@Micheal Linne while I see your point that he shouldn’t have shoved a disabled man
0 likes1) why confront the victim’s wife with aggression
2) if you saw some guy screaming at your wife, you’d be pissed so rationality and patience goes out the window
3) why in the FUCK did this man have a firearm on him, he didn’t get it from his car, he had it in his person for whatever reason (I don’t give a fuck if “it’s his right to own a gun”, why would you go outside with a fucking firearm just use a taser or pepper-spray)
4) this man made the victim’s son see his father’s life fade away, in front of him
I dont care how you pin it, Michael was in the wrong for killing the victim and hopefully he thinks twice or thrice before opening fire because he couldnt handle a shove after yelling at another man’s woman
@Enter the Abyss black shoved disabled man first, he escalated it to assault. Disabled man shot in self defense afraid for his life.
0 likes@Micheal Linne so you don’t think pointing your gun and giving him a warning would have been enough to stop the other guy from attacking? Did he really have to kill him dead? Just cause he’s disabled? I agree that you shouldn’t shove someone just like that but it does not justify murder. Y’all not living in the Wild West anymore, it’s the 21st century! But then again, I’m just a European who doesn’t get this whole gun fetish...
0 likes@Micheal Linne oh and parking in a disabled spot is not a crime, it’s a violation at best. You’re trying to justify cold blooded murder and it’s making me worried for the community you live in, if you think that’s an okay way to handle confrontation.
0 likes@Micheal Linne Also, you say it’s “disgusting” to park illegally in a disabled spot when you’re not disabled but seem to have no problem with the illegal parking of the guy who then went on to harass a woman with her children. I’m sure it has nothing to do with the skin colour that you still think the white guy is in the right for killing a man and traumatising a whole family - just cause someone parked wrong and then someone was shoved cause they’re provoking a confrontation that could’ve been handled in a peaceful manner. You’re also not wondering why this guy walked up to a black woman and her kids with a gun on him. Yep, you’re totally not racist. 😂
0 likes@Micheal Linne what planet are you on
0 likes@Bella N 😂
0 likes@Bella N crying over the internet wont bring the black dude back from the dead
0 likes@Micheal Linne It wasn't just "confronting" tho. Witnesses in the building referred to it as a loud argument, which generally translates to a screaming match. It doesn't matter if someone is taking the disabled spot. It's not on you as a citizen to confront someone over it, especially a woman who looks to be by herself in the car with a child there, and especially not screaming at her. Her boyfriend was honestly completely justified in pushing the guy over and away from his girlfriend, as he obviously posed a threat to her. You don't just pull a gun on someone because you got pushed for being an asshole, and you especially don't fucking shoot it at someone when they're obviously backing away because you have a fucking gun pulled on them.
0 likes@Micheal Linne You need help, you should go to therapy.
0 likes@Micheal Linne agree both men way overreacted. but did he say was disabled ? he doesnt look it. All about him seems he just want to bully someone .
0 likes@MrManic52001 I have a weird feeling if it was a white guy who pushed another man to defend his family you wouldn’t use the term thug.
0 likes@Micheal Linne Fair point about him pushing the guy, that seemed pretty unnecessary. But once he had a gun trained on him and was taking several steps back he stopped being a serious threat. I don't really see a justified killing here, but it could've looked different from his perspective.
0 likes@Micheal Linne It's common sense to use a gun as a threat. You don't just pull it out and shoot immediately. There is nothing to defend.
0 likes@Micheal Linne You are changing your own arguments. In the beginning u said "we can't be sure who spoke"
0 likesAnd then u said "by confronting someone, who talked first by the way!"
Also, that "douchebag" has 3 kids
The suspect is not disabled
And his behavior from the very beginning is aggressive.
@Micheal Linne if u r not trained enough to not just randomly shoot someone the moment u panic, then u shouldn't have a gun in the first place.
0 likesSo by now we got
1. Not disabled
2. Aggressive
3. Parked in illegal spot himself
4. Shouldn't have a gun
5. Shot a guy who was clearly stepping away, the only reason he was unsure for a split second was bc his wife was still near the psycho.
He took 3 steps back, then stumbled for a split second, which u can tell it's bc his wife and kids r near the car dammit.
6. The suspect was there long enough to know ab kids
@Vilesentry People like you make every situation worse. All of this is off of uninformed assumptions that can't be proven one way or another.
0 likes@Jon Osterman Most people that see a burglar in their home won't give them a chance to surrender. I can't say that "imminent threat" is subjective but at the same time, an imminent threat may be different to everyone. Look at Kyle Rittenhouse, a case where a lot of people believe he murdered 2 people just because the media created a narrative when in reality it was the most textbook case of self defense, possibly in the history of self defense.
0 likes@Jon Osterman well in the us we have what's called a castle doctrine which means we don't have a duty to retreat in our own homes. Also this man couldn't retreat because he was laying on the ground and the imminent threat was his attacker stepping towards and behind him. Perhaps I know how that law works better than you because it actually isn't about objective levels of danger it's about subjective levels of danger. If someone is running towards you and looking at you angrily and focused and reaching for something for example, you don't have to take into consideration whatever they might be reaching for because you may not see it until it's too late. That's a deadly threat even without the context of being violently thrown to the ground first. That person could be handing you a summons, but so long as the item they're reaching for is unclear, you have any reason to believe your life might be in danger, and they are targeting you, shooting them would be self defense if you couldn't retreat. Say you were a paraplegic sitting on a park bench with your wheelchair too far out of reach for you to grab it and get away for example.
0 likesWell this guy's attacker took a step towards him from his point of view, its the same principle as reaching for something, it doesn't matter what they are stepping towards you for or reaching for so long as you have a reasonable belief the purpose is to assault and seriously harm you, like you know, right after having thrown you to the ground and potentially killing you.
@Angela Halliwell except he didn't start a shouting match, it's debatable wether he even spoke first and also he was going to just take pictures and report them until he got into that argument and was violently ambushed
0 likes@G Victor but it's all good though, you'll get yours💯
0 likesA lot of debate going on here. My biggest take away is you get assholes who create problems and get into confrontational predicaments regularly. When you disrespect someone's partner, a lot of the time, you will get a rise.
0 likesI know people are saying he didn't have the right to push him, legally, but in a lot of cases that's what will happen in a situation like this. And confrontations like this happen everywhere, all across the world and all of the time.
However, in most other countries, you don't have a significant portion of society carrying a firearm.
@Oklahoma southerner except he made a third step towards and behind him after those 2 steps back and it was only then that he was shot. The biggest reason he lost his trial was because he was too stupid to ask for a lawyer before trying his best to convince the cops it was necessary when the cops will only ever use what you say against you in court even if you fabricate parts in order to make yourself appear better and the truth would have happened to give you a better defense. He stated he was watching his feet because that's what training taught him he was supposed to do, but he was aiming over his back, there was no way he could have seen the guys feet but what he could see was leg moving towards him, upper torso pointed towards him. It would have been better for his defense if he told the truth instead of trying to convince the cop that through virtue of his training it could only have been self defense because his training might suggest he knew how to identify a threat and what he saw specifically constituted that threat but then he added in details he couldn't have seen like the man's feet.
0 likes@Noah Housh well the court decided who was wrong
0 likes@Noah Housh is it reasonable to shoot somebody over a parking space?
0 likes@bornstandin he's in prison because he both lied to to make him appear in better standing to the police, and talked to the police in general without council there to advise him not to make false, exaggerated or reductive statements or to just not say certain things in general.
0 likes@Mimi Adams so that's what the other guy was talking about. Apparently I missed that. If that's true then it definitely speaks about this man's general inability to make sound decisions about gun safety. At the same time though people act like seeing a holstered gun is threatening people with that gun so I could see someone reporting falsely that he waved it around just because of road rage if he just had it on him at the time. Had they provided a picture or video of this behavior?
0 likes@Bruokoli he stepped towards and behind him on the third step and kept his torso pointed towards him, that's enough in my opinion
0 likes@Bruokoli one kick to the head and he would have died. Or if he just hit his head when he fell. He was going to continue the beating until he had drawn the gun, if he hadn't he'd very likely have been the one in a coffin. The matter of self defense comes after though and it hangs entirely on wether you believe that from the shooters perspective it would be reasonable to believe he was stepping forward to continue the beating and from the shooter's perspective I do believe that's the case as he was aiming over his back and could only watch the man's leg and torso which were both towards him as the leg moved towards him
0 likes@Chris Marklowitz he stepped in and behind him on the 3rd step and hadn't been shot until that moment. Our point of view was privileged and we have to consider that this man had to aim over his back and make that decision with a much more limited field of view
0 likes@Storm™ that's fair enough but the question becomes if that constitutes a situation where you should expect to be ambushed and are therefore provoking violence against you.
0 likes@Micheal Linne sitting in a car, his holstered gun would not be visible to people in other cars.
0 likes@Higai you carry a gun in case you need to defend yourself. You may not realize it but you generally don't hear about the mass shootings that are stopped by civilians defending themselves with guns, nor do you hear about robberies stopped by gun owners, nor do you hear about violent gang attacks stopped by gun owners. All you ever hear about is shootings that weren't stopped. If gun owners didn't ever carry their guns on them, that's all there would ever actually be.
0 likes@Micheal Linne who are you trying to kid, he wasn't exactly quoting love poetry to her 🙄..the body language is clear to see in the video, he was trying to intimidate the woman, seeing her as an easy target ...the guy has form, he had on at least FIVE different occasions (that we know of, likely more) brandished a firearm in road rage incidents...this was part of a pattern of well established behaviour, but this time he shot and killed his victim in front of both CCTV and eye witnesses
0 likes@annabanananaaaa it's actually a bad idea to try to give a verbal warning most of the time especially in up close situations because speaking forces you into a moment of hesitation and being unfocused and you'd be unable to pull the trigger if that person had reached for your gun or kicked you in the head. Talking only gives your attacker an opportunity. Some attackers may know and use this but also attackers sometimes just do it without even knowing this information.
0 likesI wish he would have given a verbal warning in this case or if his attacker had said something like we're good man, no need to shoot or something because at least then there would have been a better chance the shooter could have realized he was in fact backing off and also verbally warning him may have prompted a response to take an action that would more visibly signify surrender like say put your hands up or don't move could have lead to compliance that would clearly pointed to the shift from chaos to control of the situation.
Also it's not really about severity of the actual crime of parking in a disabled parking lot, I think people absolutely should take pictures and report illegal parking in disabled parking spots, it's one of the scummyest things someone can do.
@annabanananaaaa it's entirely different from parking in disabled parking also, he approached the car long before knowing anyone was inside let alone who was so no I don't think it was racially motivated. If you assume that just because they did happen to be black, that means he must be racist than I'm afraid you are the racist.
0 likes@Offended the blue one
0 likes@Bella N the situation is horrible, that doesn't make it not self defense
0 likes@Ben Smith yeah, other countries just deny that their people are dying and how because they're afraid of the sensitive subject🤣🤣. Self defense has to be protected or else you just tell people to accept their fate and die or spend their life in prison if their attacked
0 likes@Micheal Linne Seeing as how there's no audio, it is impossible for us to know the tone of the conversation. Assuming voices were raised, and the assailant, and victim in this situation, the man who was shot fatally, may have acted proportionally if he believed his wifes and children's life was in danger, the shooter, who claims to have acted in self defense did not react proportionally to being pushed, and clearly excessive force was used simply because it was available to him. The fact that he shot him after walking three steps apparently away from him, and according to his own account shows that he was note acting whole heartedly and entirely in self defense.
0 likes@Uuuh h "defending" I presume. He took a step forward and behind a guy that was aiming over his back because he had just been violently thrown to the ground and his torso was still facing him. That would look like coming at him from the shooter's point of view.
0 likes@Micheal Linne I think the one thing you're not paying attention to at all is the more emotional side of things. Because I highly doubt that the victim was going actually start beating him up in broad daylight with a bunch of spectators including some of his kids.
0 likesIf anything, he would have yelled some more at the perp and then either gone back to his business(more likely) or helped him to his feet(less likely).
And this is all besides the fact that the perp shot a man with a family despite having time to really think over his decision.
@LesbianWitchAcademia he would have reported it to the police with pictures if either she hadn't rolled down her window to talk to him or he hadn't ambushed him from behind. I think people should report illegal disabled parking, you can't get much scummyer than doing that.
0 likes@LesbianWitchAcademia also he took a step towards and behind the shooter with his torso facing him on the third step and wasn't shot until that exact moment. The shooter had to aim over his back and had a limited field of view and not the privileged one we enjoyed ergo self defense
0 likes@Ben Smith definitely. I think everyone probably should go to therapy. That's how we stop exploited and unhappy people from exploding some day when they decide they've had enough and the pressure has become too much. Its a way better solution than just telling people to suck it up
0 likes@Ronnie Heuveltje I was actually kinda corrected on the disabled part, it's either that both he and his step mom are disabled or just his step mom because he brought up his step mom as one reason he didn't like people parking illegally in the disabled parking. People are saying it was just a pet peeve but also I think people should report illegal disabled parking, it's one of the scummyest things you can do.
0 likes@Razvan Nestor none of us use our real names for accounts, or at least I hope so. I don't know if I would have shot, I personally wouldn't have gotten into or continued that argument, but if I had and had been shoved I'd hope that I'd be able to tell he was surrendering because I like everyone else would rather not take a life if I don't have to and would hope I never feel like I have to. If I had taken the shot I'd hope I wouldn't lie to the police about things like he did and I'd hope I would remember to ask for a lawyer before speaking to them in the first place. He was so focused on trying to protect their perception of him he got rid of his legitimate claim to self defense and frankly cost himself his case.
0 likes@Micheal Linne The fact you're justifying what was obviously murder speaks volumes on your psych. Go get help before you end up being the guy in one of these videos
0 likes@Bob that's my whole point. I think the third step where he gets shot would look like a step at the shooter from the shooter's point of view
0 likes@Someone I've been corrected about the disabled part, apparently it was his stepmother, either way I think it should be documented and reported when someone illegally parks in disabled parking. Also I said at best we can't tell who spoke first though I do think it was probably her, I was just pointing out that you can't tell when the window was rolled down and decided it's pointless to get into a he said she said so I just decided to believe she spoke first because that's what it looks like to me.
0 likes@Someone it doesn't matter if he had 3 kids or 100 kids, he started the violence and I think it would look like he was coming back for more from the shooter's point of view
0 likes@Jayden that kid had such impressive levels of self control, he didn't shoot a single person who wasn't clearly from any point of view trying to hit him over the head with something, pinning him against a wall while trying to wrestle his gun away from him, or leveling off to shoot him while he couldn't get away. It doesn't get more self defense than that.
1 like@B49ify when did he say something racist? Was that even alleged?
0 likes@Mimi Adams road rage often entails exiting the vehicle. It doesn't usually go reported when people stay in their vehicles
0 likes@Micheal Linne Exactly. I feel like it has been turned into a race issue as much as this has.
0 likes@Micheal Linne Should be reported, okay
0 likesBut the guy started walking around the car first, meaning he was already trying to engage. There is a chance she started first, but u can see that he is the one looking at her car, and going around it, so it's still no problem that she would ask him what he is doing.
And again, perspective doesn't give u rights to distort real footage, the guy took 3 steps back, it's common sense to use a gun for threat only, and attack only if u r actually getting attacked, if u r incapable of understanding a man who took 3 steps back is backing down, then you should NOT have a gun. If u r incapable of controlling yourself under pressure, u should NOT have a gun.
And lastly, ofcourse having kids matter. If u r that innocent of a person, u would think at least twice before shooting someone, u would think a million times before shooting someone in front of their family and kids.
The victim did wrong by attacking so violently, but it can by no means justify the guy shooting him.
@Angela Halliwell I'm not sure he actually brandished the firearm. People will see a holstered weapon and think its a threat, that doesn't make it brandishing the firearm. If there was picture or video evidence though I would have to agree that it speaks to his inability to safely handle a firearm
0 likes@Micheal Linne Neither u, nor the suspect understand the scale of tragedy of someone getting killed in seconds in front of their family, and collapsing in front of their kid.
0 likesU can not hold that kind of a horror equal to being shoved or parking in a handicapped place.
@Storm™ it is impossible to know. I just think that third step would look from his point of view like he was coming back for more.
0 likesIf we had evidence that he was yelling racial expletives at her or threatening her I would throw self defense out the window because that would constitute asking for violence and a readily present need for the man to use violence to defend his wife
@Jayden Yet you have no issue with the "uninformed assumption" the guy had that he was going to be attacked, which led to a man's death.
0 likesSeems like the only reason that wouldn't bother you is because you don't see him as a real person.
@Micheal Linne also your whole argument is wrong. He gets shot in the third step. He doesn't even have time to do anything.
1 likeSees the gun
One full step
Second full step
Third, his back is turned, still looking at the guy, u can see he is stepping forward, away from the suspect, and without being able to complete the third step he gets shot.
U can tell that the guy shoved to the ground wanted revenge. It's not brain surgery.
@SIAED actually you have a good point. I didn't consider this would have been in front of his kids. I don't think that necessarily removes self defense though unless we can prove the shooter knew those kids were there and that they were this man's kids. If those two things are true I think that definitely changes things especially since it's not like this man had been verbally threatening him as it was all purely physical threats.
0 likes@Micheal Linne U know that your argument doesn't make sense.
0 likesIf someone is moving away from u, someone is moving away from u
Again, if u r that bad at judging threat, then ofcourse u should NOT have a gun. And if u r not trustable with a gun, then that means u should NOT have it.
If u r capable of hurting innocent ppl, at the first problem U face, it means u shouldn't have it.
That easy.
@Bella N I must have missed the part he had said that but while that speaks to his character that doesn't make it not self defense. Another commenter gave me a new viewpoint on the matter though and I kind of agree with him that the man probably wouldn't have beat the shooter in front of his own kids so I think if we had proof the shooter had definitely known those kids were there and were this man's kids it would throw self defense completely out the window.
0 likes@Vilesentry What are you even talking about. I never said it was justified or argued for it. I'm just saying that you went after someone's character for hypothetical situations that are made up by you. The whole "Bet you wish he shot his whole family too" rant you went on about is just baseless assumptions and you never challenged his argument, you just assume racism and used it as a crutch. Which is annoying to see. The case didn't have anything to do with race besides the fact that race exists in our civilization and the people in the confrontation were 2 different races.
0 likes@Micheal Linne Gun is for life or death situations
0 likesUsually if u face danger, if u get shoved to ground
U Back down, call police
So untill the point to murdering someone
U have a bunch of things u could go to.
But if u see gun as the easy option so when u face any level of danger, u just shoot someone
It means, u r incapable of understanding the responsibility, controlling yourself, and judging a situation. It's the same for driving. If u r incapable of sensing when to stop, if u r too slow at reacting to sudden things, then it means u should not drive because u t putting other's life at danger.
@Someone i agred with that last part assuming the shooter knew those kids were there and were this man's kids. If he knew then that throws self defense out the window because it seriously reduces the likely hood this man would have beat him because it was in front of his kids
0 likes@Someone again i think it looked very different from the shooter's view point. I think that third step looked towards him and I think his torso was still towards him at that moment.
0 likes@Bella N you have to argue not only that he knew they were there but that he knew they were his.
0 likes@Micheal Linne I checked , so TWO incidents where he was reported to police for physically threatening other road users with a gun, a further incident for which he was accused of Dangerous Driving by police after he deliberately caused a crash out of spite, and more interestingly a few months earlier he has had a standoff over the same parking spot !! threatening to shoot the person parking in the handicap bay, and using racial slurs towards him...it's very much a pattern of behaviour, , I get the uneasy feeling that that confrontation earlier that year was a form of "dress rehearsal" he was waiting for the right "opportunity"
0 likesSee quote from Wikipedia ""Ricky Kelly, a male truck driver claims Drejka confronted him over parking his employer's tanker truck in the handicapped space. He accuses Drejka of threatening to shoot him and using a racial slur. The store owner Salous intervened and ordered Drejka to stop or else he would call the police, to whom Drejka replied, "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After the incident Drejka calls the company the driver works for and complains to the owner John Tyler, reportedly saying the driver was "lucky I didn't blow his head off." The driver reports this incident to the police in July after the shooting of Markeis McGlockton at the same location.
@Angela Halliwell yeah he's guilty. Or at least deserves to be in prison. I wish I'd known that sooner. There's no arguing with that.
0 likes@Uuuh h I agree now but only because another commenter gave me more information that made it clear that this guy definitely deserves jail time. Context that wasn't in the video
0 likes@Micheal Linne Mmk from what I saw on the camera footage he had a clear view of him and he was not charging toward him at all.
0 likes@Micheal Linne then ... why didn’t he..?
0 likesWoop- Didn’t see that this ended. Don’t reply.
@Micheal Linne If it were about subjective threats, no one would ever be convicted because they could just use "I was scared" as a defense. That shit only works with cops because of qualified immunity and all that nonsense. The castle doctrine is NOT stand your ground, and there is more to it than duty to retreat. Only in stand your ground laws is there no longer any duty to retreat or refrain. But with castle, you cannot shoot a burglar who has surrendered to you, because it means they are no longer an imminent threat. This is absolutely objective too. It is not "oh, well, I certainly felt threatened, even though he was on his stomach with his hands behind his head." That doesnt work with castle doctrine, and depending on the prosecutors office, it might not work with stand your ground either. There is a very narrow legal definition of "imminent threat," which "means a condition of noncompliance that is reasonably certain to place life or limb in direct peril and is immediate and impending and not merely remote, uncertain, or contingent." That last part is particularly important here, and totally contradicts everything you just said. Perhaps you don't know more than me about law, perhaps because you didn't bother doing some basic googling. NOT MERELY REMOTE, UNCERTAIN, OR CONTINGENT. Get that through that thick skull of yours. it might save your ass someday from a manslaughter charge.
0 likes@Jon Osterman except;
0 likes1, this guy was prone and his assailant was still standing
2, his assailant was from his point of view maneuvering to step behind him and towards him. That's where the subjective part becomes important btw, the point of view of the person in question claiming self defense is not only important, it's everything. He had to aim over his back, he did not have the privileged view that we do. Point of view is subjective because it relies on the position of the person in question. That person could not have seen what was happening from a disembodied overhead point of view like we did. He was after all, on the ground.
3, stand your ground isn't even necessary to apply to call it self defense, he was on the ground and thus unable to retreat so the only thing that matters is if from his point of view a reasonable person would percieve a threat on their life.
4, it wasn't remote, uncertain or contingent on anything as his assailant was less than 5 feet away and was stepping behind and towards him, had just thrown him to the ground in a surprise attack, and hadn't given any indication that if he did something specific he'd assault and kill him, the assault wasn't even clearly linked to any actions he had taken at this point, we only know why he did it after the fact.
5, I already agreed this guy deserved to go to jail after another commenter gave information that wasn't provided in this video that made it very clear way beyond what the video covered that this guy very likely was looking for a fight, so why don't you pay attention instead of continuing an argument that ended so long ago that you're not only late to the table, the bank is foreclosing on the mfing house and the guy you're looking for has already moved twice?
@Jon Osterman you're the one that called me out after the argument was already over and insulted me. Responding may not have been necessary but don't worry, I figured I'd explain to you why nothing you said contradicted anything anyways. If you still don't get that then you're just choosing to ignore the facts and arguing because you're upset that I disagree with you. If you don't think point of view is important there are thousands of cases for you to go find where it was ruled self defense because the person would reasonably percieve it that way from their point of view even when evidence shows that person wasn't in danger from a better and ultimately privileged point of view.
0 likesMy husband is a quadriplegic in a wheelchair, and uses a lift that requires handicap parking. Typically people that misuse handicap spots do so because theyre in a hurry, and not malicious. Sometimes I just park right behind them perpendicularly and slowly take my time unloading my husband. My hope is that I slow them down enough to make them think about thier choices next time. Maybe seeing a helpless man being loaded or unloaded from a handicap van might show them another perspective. But I damn sure am not gonna kill or hurt someone over a parking spot.
1411 likesReplies (49)
Love your comment. Good judgement. No one deserves to die over something that can be fixed. I don't like people who park in a disabled lot but we can't solve that with violence.
97 likesI mean he didn't kill anyone over taking up a handicap spot, he did so over being pushed to the ground. Everything he's done was perfectly fine and justified, until he pulled the trigger.
33 likesHe didn't shot him for parking wtf !!! r u saying, he shot him because he thought that guy was gonna fck him up, he was arguing with that women from a good distance it was her husband who thought its ok to assault a man just because he was bigger than him imagine if that man was an officer on duty would he do that NOOOOOO he would talk first .. so why did he assault him??
32 likes@Girish Gopal the guy was already walking away????
38 likes@Girish Gopal dude pushed him because he was getting aggressive with his girlfriend. How was he to know if that coward was going to lay hands on her or not? He defended his woman as he should have.
62 likesI love this comment.
7 likes@Unfriendly Black Hottie It's really hard to think right when meeting this kind of situation, he just pushed him showing maybe his anger towards this man's wrong decision to occupy the space wc suppose only for disable person, but the reaction was too much, to take someone's life for such a senseless reason
9 likeswhy not
0 likesBless you for loving your husband and helping him through his struggle. Being a quadriplegic must be a nightmare, it is good that he has you to help care for him.
14 likesYou are brilliant. That is the best solution to this problem Ive ever heard
9 likesThe problem with boxing them in is the same ignorant jerk who parks in the handicap spot is sometimes the same ignorant jerk that will shoot you for boxing him in. I wouldn't take that risk if I was concerned about my spouses safety.
6 likesI also have had this problem before when people yell at my mother in a wheelchair asking if they could move to the next spot. If I was older at that time I would also be charged with manslaughter.
1 likeyeah whenever my dad parks in one I always remind him but he always makes sure that whatever he does he does it fast. we never go into an actual store while in a handicapped parking its usually a convenience store or the cleaners
2 likesThis dude definitely deserved to go to prison and that dude didn’t deserve to get shot. However, if this had been a black guy shooting a white guy in the same situation, this comment section would have A LOT more “they shouldn’t have parked handicap” or “he shouldn’t have shoved them to the ground” because it’s completely okay to hate white people purely for the color of their skin.
11 likesThat’s the most profound learning lesson. Can’t say I’ve ever parked in a handicap spot(usually park farthest away from cars as possible so no one hits my car). Lol
7 likesBless you for being so damn patient and a better person then me cause I know If I was in your shoes there’s no way I’d handle it as mature as you do.
Do you think it’s wise to escalate a situation or cause confrontation when you have a handicapped spouse? Does it make your day better?
3 likesBetter to be fined than to lose your husband right? I completely agree. That family didn't deserve what happened to them.
3 likesNYC we mind our own business and smile a lot.
0 likes@YOU ⬋ ༼ ༼ ༼ ⃝ꅟ𓂺⬅ME if somebody's arguing with your wife are you going to push them down to the ground
2 likesHe didn't kill him over the spot but because the clown out of nowhere comes out and pushes him I woulda beat tf outta that clown for doing that tf he think he is
1 likeThat sounds kinda humiliating for your husband
1 likeNo the correct way is to mag dump into the car yelling about disabled stickers!
0 likesYes Carlita
0 likesWould you expect to be pushed to the ground if you did decide to explain why someone shouldn’t park in a handicap spot? I think there’s no question this was manslaughter...but I also think the man would be alive if he didn’t attack the man in the first place. Personally, I don’t think it’s his job to police the parking lot...but he did.
2 likes@Saltcor I think when you try and reverse the race in this situation it’s hard to say what exactly would happen. Especially since I see that you’re trying to make a point so obviously you’re going to state what you’d expect others to comment. If in fact this did happen, it would be reverse racism.
0 likesYou just never know, my theory is to continue on my errand and bitch about it later to my husband... If I were with a genuinely handicapped person I would probably tell the clerk.
1 likeThis guy deserves 15 years in prison for killing. But being physically assaulted with intent to be harmed, thats not ok.
2 likesAgreed
0 likesThe passive approach - priceless.
1 like@Girish Gopal Its emotions, its emotions simply because if something like that has not happened before there is no way to prepare for it. Some people are better able to deal with pressure.
0 likesParking in a handicapped space without permit IS malicious regardless of the justification or reasoning.
2 likes@Nikita Zagorodniy yeah OK then keyboard warrior 🤣 this is why Murica needs gun regulation. Y’all are crazy AF
1 like@Nikita Zagorodniy you got me good 🤣🤣🤣
1 likeyeah so you park and intentionally slow down someone who isn't trying to take up a spot for very long? That makes you just as petty as the person you are talking about. 99% of the time handicapped parking spots don't even get used so if I gotta take up that spot for 30 seconds I don't feel bad about it. I find it irritating that all the good parking spots up front and close are almost always empty.
0 likesI think it’s about reasonableness. If there’s a lot of free spots and someone is in a rush I’ll give them a pass. It’s just about being considerate to others
0 likesbrilliant response
0 likes@YOU ⬋ ༼ ༼ ༼ ⃝ꅟ𓂺⬅ME you don't put hands on people ..personally I wouldn't shoot someone, but I am not the type who gets hands put on him( not saying I'm a tough guy , but I try to just live and let live) , but when you put your hands on people especially smaller people than you are taking a huge risk
0 likesIf there is someone in or near the car I walk upto the car and flick my flashlight on and off on my phone too pretend I've taken a photo, 8/10 times they move within 2 mins if they see me, the other 2 times they freak out and ask me to delete the photo 🤣
0 likesTill an angry man comes out and pushes your husband out of his wheelchair onto the ground... Then starts to kick him on the ground into a bloody mess and he wishes he had a gun for self-defense but didn't and ends up handicap and now many injuries.
1 likeI think both parties messed up big time, so not taking sides. But fact is this man with his family would still be alive if he didn't come out resorting to violence first off and the other man didn't need to pull the trigger but was in-line to have his gun out and aimed and if further aggression, I'd imagine their would be no prison time. Lack of consideration for handicap(general lack of consideration too) is annoying and I actually respect the man going up to the car and his first initial complaints, it's just he took it too far at the end with the gun shot.
If he really was annoyed or concerned about the spot he would have politely ask the woman in the car to tell his husband or whoever was driving to be mindful where he parks next time and see if there's a way to move the car (spare key or if it's going to take a while maybe go get the keys and move it), that was not the issue. The issue is that he wanted to start a fight and feel superior in some way, then he got physically attacked and because he is a coward pull out he is gone and on top of that he was waiting to any excuse to use it so he did
1 likeHe def wasn’t intending to kill anyone over a handicap spot , it was after he got push and slammed to the floor , in my eyes he defended himself. The guy should of never put his hands on him. You do that and what happens after is a consequence. Period.
0 likes@YOU ⬋ ༼ ༼ ༼ ⃝ꅟ𓂺⬅ME if someone is verbally arguing with your wife or significant other in a distance .. is ok to slam them to the floor out of nowhere instead of saying hey what’s going on or saying something to stop it or deescalate the situation like a normal person?! If he couldn’t do that than the guy who shot him couldn’t either. Both were wrong.
0 likesYou don't have to, this guy will 👍
0 likesMicheale Currin he was arguing from a good distance away, he couldn't have hurt her in the car anyway. Marquez could have come out and confronted Drejka, instead he assaults him from behind, and though the arm injury seems to have been fake, he could have very well shattered his arm, broken his hip, his leg, or caused any kind of other injury because he was arguing over a parking spot. His first act is violence, so I doubt he would have stopped after just pushing him.
0 likesI'm not trying to defend Drejka, but Marquez was just as stupid here
@Rich Schnippel The situation was very specific , and both parties acted inappropriately . (Killing person too far ) usually happens a lot watching cinema being annoying angering other party the killing them because they attacked him .
0 likesIn Washington that would be considered unlawful imprisonment the person would be legally allowed to shoot you at your husband
0 likes👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿 That's what's up.
0 likesI love the fact that you take care of your husband. Gives me faith in humanity
0 likesLike your style
0 likesI am disabled veteran. I have a handicap placard. Sometimes I use it and at times I don't. It all depends on how much I hurt that day. I see cars park in the handicap parking all the time. I would never confront a person for doing this to avoid what happened in this video. I would rather limp a little further to get to my destination. I've seen enough blood for one life time. With that said I do believe in protecting myself or anyone else. A fine line I try to avoid at all cost.
952 likesReplies (41)
Good man
16 likesThank you for your service moe ❤️
25 likesthank you for serving, and thank you for facing horrors so my generation didn’t have to. I really do appreciate it and i hope you’re doing well!
14 likesI can’t imagine what you’ve seen but as a person who suffers from PTSD I understand how hard it is to live with, much love to you 🥰
But there is another point to be had here: everyone in this altercation was wrong in their actions, and a whole bunch of lives got ruined for it.
15 likesEven just parking in the handicap spot should make you question yourself, "should I really be doing this?"
@TransRoofKorean Kay but shooting someone and killing them in front of their children unnecessarily should give you a *little more pause than parking in a handicap spot. I get what you’re saying, but no.
45 likes@TransRoofKorean To even suggest that parking in the handicap spot and killing another human being are even in the same stratosphere of wrong is completely dehumanizing the victim and the situation, are you insane.
40 likesThank you for your service 🙏🏽
2 likes@Grimm Reaper another disabled vet here. Glad to have both of y’all back at home brotha!
3 likes@Patroclus unfortunately that is an issue and nothing can replace a human life but fear and trauma is a thing that can twist the mind so terribly that even the most logical solution or the most morally correct solution is ignored.
1 likeI’m certainly not proud of my country’s history, though i’d like to have faith in people no matter what they’ve done as long as they have humanity
i think everyone should be held accountable for their actions, but shouldn’t be shamed for their actions as long as they are willing to learn and grow
0 likes@gothic_ratboi I respect the individual on a certain level for putting their life on the line. But let's not create a narrative that they've given freedom to their country in regards to wars and conflicts where that was never in contention.
3 likesVery few service people outside of say the second world war have ever fought for anything remotely meaningful. They deserve pity, but they shouldn't be honoured as custodians of freedom when that is far from the truth.
@Patroclus i think i miscommunicated my point, i totally agree with you, american history tends to idolize meaningless wars and say that it provided freedom when in reality it fueled fear. i meant to show that i respect this person for putting their life on the line because though i haven’t seen death, i have PTSD from past trauma and couldn’t imagine how much more scarring it would be to have to be to fight on the field
4 likes(i was diagnosed btw)
thank you for your service sir
1 likeIve had disabled friends who have been harassed even having a handicap placard. Its actually becoming a pretty common thing
3 likesThank you for your service. God bless you.
1 like@TransRoofKorean you are absurdly upset
2 likes@Be Bold Mmmmhmmmmm.
1 likethank you 🙌
0 likesThank you for your service
0 likes@INFinitePain ok
1 like@TransRoofKorean you absolutely implied they were equal, apparently not intentionally. But no point in arguing with the delusional.
0 likes@TransRoofKorean can’t convince the delusional
2 likesWell said
0 likesNowhere near the same circumstances as you, but I agree that there is absolutely no reason to escalate such a trivial interaction to the point of a confrontation let alone a fatal confrontation.
2 likesThank you for your service.
0 likes@LeciPeci because teaching your son that you can do whatever you want and treat people however you want is a great lesson. I'm sure the kid is better off without this wonderful role model
1 likeIv used a placard on and off depending how I feel that day. I also would never feel the need to confront someone that I just felt was being selfish or lazy. Maybe they just didn’t notice. It’s not the crime of the century
0 likes@Cobalt360Degrees I don't think your comprehension skills are too good.
0 likesRespect
0 likesOK...! I'm 74 year old man, got a really beat-up set of legs...I could get a 'Card' but just let it go to others who need it more...I can just walk a hundred feet more, like I did at CostCo yesterday....still funny to see able-bodied people 'circling' the parking lot, waiting for a closer space to the store.
1 likethank you for serving, hope it gets better
0 likesI don't know, something is wrong wegen you live in a country where you constantly think about life and death.
0 likesThe black guy took a running start and pushed him hard from behind, gave him whiplash and then was looking at him like, what's up!??? Pulled up his shorts again and was ready to fight, waiting for him to get up so he can punch him.
2 likesSo to say that guy was the victim is ridiculous. I am a liberal but I am so tired of people on both sides not being objective and honest.
@TransRoofKorean My boy here would look at that dad who killed his child for eating his father's day cake and unironically say "everyone in this altercation was wrong in their actions, and a whole bunch of lives got ruined for it" lmao
3 likesDude awesome. Thank you so much for serving.
0 likesWise
0 likes@Patroclus
0 likesBut I also don't think that individuals should be demonised for being in the armed forces. It's, unfortunately, really not up to them what horrific shit show they're going to be expected to involve themselves in.
@Kira Py'romantic
0 likesI saw a really depressing documentary a little while ago and a young guy (about 20?) with terminal cancer was relentlessly harassed by strangers, even though he had disabled plates on his car. He even went so far as to carry around a signed note from his doctor confirming his terminal diagnosis. People are arseholes.
probably smart. I'd avoid people who park illegally in handicapped spots too. I'd assume they were bad and dangerous people to begin with. If they dont care about the disabled, they sure wouldnt give a damn about the safety of people around them.
0 likes@Cobalt360Degrees
0 likesI mean...fuck, dude. All that fella actually said was that parking in a disabled spot is wrong. It's not like the dude was dancing on anyone's graves. Do you really think that acknowledging that parking there was wrong suddenly means he's comparing an illegal park with murder? That's kinda fucking dumb, dude. He explicitly said that dude A did something wrong and didn't deserve to die for it, right?
Pretty fucking weak, my dude.
@Cobalt360Degrees Did the other guy not shove Dreyka onto the concrete?
0 likesTHIS IS A SHAME
2 likesWtf kills a man in cold blood and they gave him a bond….. wtf 🤬
0 likesEvery right comes with a responsibility. As someone concealed carrying you have a responsibility not to instigate situations that could escalate to physical confrontations. He should have minded his own business.
68 likesReplies (3)
Saphirefenix nope u can talk all u want its a free country
3 likes@Gsfbffx Pdhhdf And he got 20 years of that sweet, sweet freedom
19 likesGsfbffx Pdhhdf Good, thanks to his right to free speech, he talked himself into a jail cell for 20 years.
8 likesI did notice when Michael pulled up, there were parking spots open along the entire front of the building-(much closer to the door) but he choose to pull in right next to their car instead-which certainly shows he wasn't just 'shopping' but in reality, he was just looking for trouble and a fight.
114 likesReplies (6)
it was his spot for him because it was his shop.. hes there every day
13 likesbill nalder you missed my sarcasm
5 likes@No Name haha, im sorry, im usually good at that, my apologies sir!
1 likebill nalder ——He mentioned ‘protecting his family’, I’m kinda thinking he lives w/his elderly mom and he has some way of knowing when someone parks in that spot, as if that’s his job.
3 likes@Judy Wright the "protecting his family' quote was in regards to the victim running to the aid of his wife during the confrontation to with Michael.
1 likeBill nalder
6 likesHe didn't park in a space. That corner where he parked, was not a parking space. They were in a disabled space, but he chose to park illegally so that his car was closer to hers. He drove up to her car, illegally parked, got out and circled the car, then went up to the window, and then from the video, he seemingly started yelling at her. The man comes out and sees some random dude is screaming at his wife, and so he shoves angry gun guy. That was a bad idea, but I get it. Angry gun guy saw his opportunity to shoot up a black man, assuming that nobody would give two fucks. That was really, really bad idea.
You just know this little man had been waiting for this his whole life. Unfortunately for him he didn’t end up as the superhero he was in his head.
411 likesReplies (12)
Love your profile pic
2 likesThis guy gives me this vibe aswell. Feels like he’s been looking to get a “legal” kill for a while and finally saw an opportunity.
36 likesToo bad for him, the PD where he lives actually does its job.
he was waiting for this moment so he could post it on reddit and get good boy points
4 likes@Savannah Coles It’s Trixie Mattel! ❤️
0 likesExactly what I was thinking. He obviously always had his gun on him to be ready to pull it out and use it. And I could imagine he was provoking confrontation all the time simply to justify using his gun. Not with equal opponents though, always weaker, unarmed people because he’s a coward.
12 likes@annabanananaaaa very much a coward
3 likesI call this scenario “ the conservative wet dream”
8 likesTiny peepee
2 likes@annabanananaaaa I agree.
1 like@Quynh Le yes
1 like@Doll face oh honey, i know the skinny queen 👑
1 likeu literally dont know that.
0 likesThis is irrelevant, but this dude slightly sounds like tobey maguire when he says somethings
0 likesWoman shouldn’t have parked her car in the handicap spot. Her bf shouldn’t have blindsided this guy. This guy should not have shot the bf. Everyone in this situation is wrong. That being said, the shooter definitely belongs in prison.
1 likeYeah. Subtitles would help instead the random odd line here and there.
0 likesSt. Matthew 5 And seeing the multitudes, He went up into a mountain, and when he was set down, his disciples came unto him.
0 likes2 And opening his mouth, he taught them, saying:
3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 Blessed are the meek: for they shall possess the land.
5 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
6 Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice and righteousness: for they shall have their fill.
7 Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
8 Blessed are the clean and pure of heart: for they shall see Lord God, the King.
9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called children of Lord God, the King.
10 Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11 Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake:
12 Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. For so they persecuted the prophets that were before you.
13 You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt lose its savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is good for nothing any more but to be cast out, and to be trodden on by men.
14 You are the light of the world. A city seated on a mountain cannot be hid.
15 Neither do men light a candle and put it under a bushel, but upon a candlestick, that it may shine to all that are in the house.
16 So let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father Lord God, the King who is in heaven.
17 Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
18 For amen I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot, or one tittle shall not pass of the law, till all be fulfilled.
19 He therefore that shall break one of these least commandments, and shall so teach men, shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven. But he that shall do and teach, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20 For I tell you, that unless your justice and righteousness abound more than that of the scribes and Pharisees, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
21 You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not murder. And whosoever shall murder shall be in danger of the judgment.
22 But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou Fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
23 If therefore thou offer thy gift at the altar, and there thou remember that thy brother hath any thing against thee;
24 Leave there thy offering before the altar, and go first to be reconciled to thy brother: and then coming thou shalt offer thy gift.
25 Be at agreement with thy adversary betimes, whilst thou art in the way with him: lest perhaps the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
26 Amen I say to thee, thou shalt not go out from thence till thou repay the last farthing.
27 You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not commit adultery.
28 But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.
29 And if thy right eye scandalize thee, pluck it out and cast it from thee. For it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell.
30 And if thy right hand scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell.
31 And it hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a bill of divorce.
32 But I say to you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, excepting for the cause of fornication, maketh her to commit adultery: and he that shall marry her that is put away, committeth adultery.
33 Again you have heard that it was said to them of old, Thou shalt not forswear thyself: but thou shalt perform thy oaths to the Lord God, the King.
34 But I say to you not to swear at all, neither by heaven, for it is the throne of Lord God, the King:
35 Nor by the earth, for it is his footstool: nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great king:
36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.
37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.
38 You have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.
39 But I say to you not to resist evil: but if one strike thee on thy right cheek, turn to him also the other:
40 And if a man will contend with thee in judgment, and take away thy coat, let go thy cloak also unto him.
41 And whosoever will force thee one mile, go with him other two,
42 Give to him that asketh of thee and from him that would borrow of thee turn not away.
43 You have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thy enemy.
44 But I say to you, Holy Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you:
45 That you may be the children of your Father Lord God, the King who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust.
46 For if you love them that love you, what reward shall you have? do not even the publicans this?
47 And if you salute your brethren only, what do you more? do not also the heathens this?
48 Be you therefore holy perfect, as also your holy heavenly Father Lord God, the King is perfect.
Sweet gun laws. Good job americans
0 likesSince the dawn of time I'm sure men have pushed other men, especially when their woman is being harassed for a stupid reason. Is that grounds to kill someone? His life wasn't in danger. He needed to mind his p's qnd q's and walk away after being pushed.
1 like42:24 why does the prosecution looks familiar to current FIDE Russian President
0 likesRevelation 18 And after these things, I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power: and the earth was enlightened with his glory.
0 likes2 And he cried out with a strong voice, saying: Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen; and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every unclean spirit, and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird:
3 Because all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication; and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her; and the merchants of the earth have been made rich by the power of her delicacies.
4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues.
5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and the Lord God hath remembered her iniquities.
6 Render to her as she also hath rendered to you; and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup wherein she hath mingled, mingle ye double unto her.
7 As much as she hath glorified herself, and lived in delicacies, so much torment and sorrow give ye to her; because she saith in her heart: I sit a queen, and am no widow; and sorrow I shall not see.
8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine, and she shall be burnt with the fire; because Lord God is strong, who shall judge her.
9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication, and lived in delicacies with her, shall weep, and bewail themselves over her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning:
10 Standing afar off for fear of her torments, saying: Alas! alas! that great city Babylon, that mighty city: for in one hour is thy judgment come.
11 And the merchants of the earth shall weep, and mourn over her: for no man shall buy their merchandise any more.
12 Merchandise of gold and silver, and precious stones; and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner of vessels of ivory, and all manner of vessels of precious stone, and of brass, and of iron, and of marble,
13 And cinnamon, and odours, and ointment, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.
14 And the fruits of the desire of thy soul are departed from thee, and all fat and goodly things are perished from thee, and they shall find them no more at all.
15 The merchants of these things, who were made rich, shall stand afar off from her, for fear of her torments, weeping and mourning.
16 And saying: Alas! alas! that great city, which was clothed with fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and was gilt with gold, and precious stones, and pearls.
17 For in one hour are so great riches come to nought; and every shipmaster, and all that sail into the lake, and mariners, and as many as work in the sea, stood afar off.
18 And cried, seeing the place of her burning, saying: What city is like to this great city?
19 And they cast dust upon their heads, and cried, weeping and mourning, saying: Alas! alas! that great city, wherein all were made rich, that had ships at sea, by reason of her prices: for in one hour she is made desolate.
20 Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for Lord God hath judged your judgment on her.
21 And a mighty angel took up a stone, as it were a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying: With such violence as this shall Babylon, that great city, be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.
22 And the voice of harpers, and of musicians, and of them that play on the pipe, and on the trumpet, shall no more be heard at all in thee; and no craftsman of any art whatsoever shall be found any more at all in thee; and the sound of the mill shall be heard no more at all in thee;
23 And the light of the lamp shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth, for all nations have been deceived by thy enchantments.
24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.
This wouldn’t have happened if Karen was minding his business smh
3 likesRIP Marquese
2 likesDoesn't look like self-defense to me. It looked like he got pissed off that a black man pushed him to the ground, so he shot him
3 likesReplies (2)
Also, that defense attorney must have huge hands to be grasping at so many straws
1 likethat's exactly what I thought too. even if the man hadn't died, a person who will shoot to kill just for fear of his ass getting "moderately" kicked, I do not think someone like that should be left out to his own devices. he's clearly got a few screws loose.
2 likesTrim trees for 15 years and then retire for the rest of your life?
0 likes39:08 this is the best cleanest pleasure!!! So glad this pile of crap is sad..boo hoo
1 likeWhat happened to Mr Funny Hair during the final statement?
0 likesCan you read me a bed time story please?
0 likes"...no reason to go overboard."
0 likes:|
The audio on this is terrible and could've been adjusted with basic video editing software
0 likeshe reminds me of some pathetic character from Deadwood.. maybe the guy who shot wild bill in the back.. idk
0 likesWhile the guy shouldn’t have pushed him the guy who was pushed shouldn’t have shot him over that
0 likesUmm... what's up with the white shirt dude with the hair sitting in the courtroom behind the prosecutor? He looks dead. 48:02
0 likesLesson learned here: Fuck society. If you see someone doing something wrong, just walk away.
0 likesHe pulled out a gun on a women with her 2 children???
0 likesWhy was the handicap parking not right up front?
0 likesMen..pushing, shoving, shooting..wtf!
0 likesAll hand posture and i can’t shake hand normally is act !!! Obviously just for inducing the idea I am hurt ! This man is a failure as human being!
0 likesThis whole interview pissed me off
0 likes"No reason to go overboard."
0 likesYou shot and killed someone, my dude, that ship has sailed.
Two years old video, five comments, looks like YouTube strikes again
3 likesWhy shoot him in the chest?
1 likeReplies (1)
"Aim for the center mass."
0 likes“Don’t start no sh*t, there won’t be no sh*t” Gandhi
0 likesThis dude was looking for any excuse to shoot a person.
0 likesThe way he pretended his arm was hurt is just about the worse acting I've ever seen.
2 likesReplies (4)
even if your arm is broken you can move it what are you talking about
0 likes@Jake Jason Does it go from being broken to not broken depending on who's watching you?
2 likes@Dog Space Cadet noone said that
0 likesIt reminds me of when kids get in trouble for fighting and start playing up their injuries to seem like the other is in the wrong, but eventually becomes like a badge of honour. Like a “yeah… my arm really hurts, I’m a tough though so it’s not a big deal”
0 likesYet another reason to stay out of florida.
1 likeLoL he didnt wanna get punched in the face bc he cant fight
0 likes"Loose lips sink ships."
0 likesWhen you don’t follow rules and put hands on another man , what you think gonna happen???
0 likesReplies (3)
Mike, you internet time is up for the week. Back to pre
0 likesYou learn from as young as kindergarten what an appropriate response to physical provocation is. You can't murder someone for pushing you over, especially if you're the one who initiated the confrontation by acting aggressively and threatening towards a man's wife and small children.
1 like@Herbert West lol how is the guy being aggressive he just ask why you parked on the wheelchair execrable parking spot. Instead of just moving you wait for your husband to take it physical and the guy protect himself
0 likesBro was looking for a reason to shoot
0 likesAnd this is why guns should be outlawed to the public
2 likesReplies (1)
agreed
1 like2nd Amendment bs
2 likesI am totally against and outraged at every action this guy took from beginning to end. Being handicapped myself and requiring the handicapped spot, I still get confronted by people like this guy who wants to challenge why I’m parking in the spot. One time I forgot to put the placard out and had some guy get in my face about stealing the spot and being lazy, etc. I then told him I’m a veteran, I’ve had 5 surgeries and more hardware in my body than he had in his shopping cart. He then apologized and said “thanks for your service and reached his hand out to shake mine. I then told him to go eff himself. People should just mind their own business. There are times I use the spots when I’m feeling terrible, and there are times I don’t use it and want to walk in the store like everyone else. To people watching this video and empathizing with this guy because they take the same position as he does - which is confronting people and not minding their own business - use this POS as a warning to you. You have no right to challenge anyone just because you feel like you’re entitled to. People, even if they are wrong by mistakenly or on purposefully parking in the wrong spot, have the same rights as you do. MIND YOUR OWN FREAKIN BUSINESS and keep your noses where they belong. If you’re a police officer on duty, that’s one thing. But if you’re a private citizen that’s quite another. This guy got exactly what he deserved for not minding his own business. And to the family of this gentleman that was merely protecting his wife, I am terribly sorry for your loss. I stand with you!
2 likesBottom line both men were wrong. The man that shoved him to the ground was wrong to put hands on him. And this guy's response was inproportionate. On the flip side of that;the guy that shoved him ha@to know that there are people like this out there. I'm not blaming the victim here I'm just saying that he bares some of the responsibility here. But in the end the verdict was correct.
0 likesReplies (2)
“I’m not blaming the victim here” … “[the victim] bares responsibility here”. This is cognitive dissonance. Does someone deserve to die because they shoved you?
1 like@James Mel bares "SOME" of the responsibility here. If you are going to comment and quote the other person's comment you at least need to be cognitive enough to get it right.plus you cherry picked a portion of it to try and make a point that quite frankly is moot if you leave out portions of the comment that are key components in what the person is saying.
0 likeswho tf does he think he is?!
0 likesLesson from this channel: don’t say a word before speaking to your lawyer
627 likesReplies (20)
i think the wildest thing is the suspect never notices the change in questions that it starts becoming about the person talking and not the events.
14 likesalso: dont kill the guy
72 likesThe actual lesson: don’t park on a handicap spot cuz you might get killed by a psycho.(bruh...as a european im totally confused how the prosecuter says he was even in his right to grab the gun after he got pushed).
23 likes@bert wert Why? It makes sense to me as a european. If this isnt the time to grab a gun when is it then? Firing after the guy would charge (which didnt happen) makes sense too. But he obviously did a terrible mistake in firing at a retreating man
18 likes@Guyin Apocket Yep, that's how I see it. Grab the gun to get the assaulter to back off...which he did. But that guy was LARPing and had to pull the trigger.
6 likes@bert wert yeah you don’t speak on behalf of all Europeans, I’m afraid I must disagree
4 likesOr better yet just walk away if you aren’t under arrest. Don’t give them anything if you don’t have to.
2 likesIt amazes me even after they are read their rights they decide to talk away.
1 like@FallenSully That's what I say. If the police start asking questions I would ask if I was under arrest. If they say no then I would leave. If I'm under arrest then I get my lawyer. Never talk to the police!
4 likesthats because this man really didn't think he didn't anything wrong. In his mind, he was completely justified. "Man pushed me, I shot man. Oh well" He didn't even care if he knew he killed the guy because he didn't see anything wrong
4 likesForeal lmaoo
0 likesDude, that's the scariest part of all these videos!! The lunatics REALLY think they're gna walk away from this shit with their spectacular skills in manipulation
0 likes@Prius Girl 🧚♂️ That seems logical, but someone who honestly thinks they did nothing wrong would want to speak to the police to, in their minds, clear the air about what happened. In that situation refusing to talk to the police would seem suspicious. I believe this guy still to this day thinks he was in the right.
0 likes@Guyin Apocket that's why it would've been better if he didn't carry one in the first place.
0 likes@Panagiotis Manologlou In this case yes, but that doesnt rule out all possibilties of actual selfdefense.
0 likesFACTS! 💯
0 likesInnocent or not… Don’t give a statement or talk to police / investigators without an attorney present.
@bert wert As a European it makes sense. Pushing someone to the ground, gives him a significant disadvantage.
0 likesSomeone with a gun is especially in danger. I can even see justification for shooting him.
If you’re guilty of murder maybe 😂
0 likesI think speaking to a lawyer should be automatic, people don't really understand their rights when they agree to talk. Not speaking to a lawyer should be an opt-out type of thing.
0 likesNope Jeff made the rules
0 likes1) ask him if you are under arrest, if no leave, if yes
2) what am I under arrest for?
3) what is the evidence against me
4) ask to be taken to the cell
5) ask for coke and pizza if they want to talk
6) tell him you know what he is doing trying to make you say incriminating stuff
7) ask him if they are playing good cop, tell him he is a prick.
8) only say simple facts about the time of arrest and repeat them a million times like I was just walking home when you guys assaulted me.
9) don't discuss the crime itself,
10) keep taking shots at the police
No offense to whoever that deffence lawyer is but he needs to get a new job. He just gives off villain vibes, he sounds like hes trying to manipulate the jury and judge.
1 likeTerrible defense attorney 🤦🏽♂️ it’s not in HD 🤧😂
1 likeThis guy cries over some dogs but doesn't cry over his wife being left behind or the children who lost their father for no reason...or the woman who lost her husband.
0 likesI would have done the same thing , after being assaulted and shoved to the ground its not because the guy backed that he is not a treat anymore , specially since while backing up he kept his hands down and could have easily pulled a gun , we see it in many police shootout videos , a man being held at gun point by officers and get blown away for having their hands doing sketchy stuff
3 likesAlso ,Its not because you know that you can provoke an altercation that its excuse the fact that he got assaulted ... wtf is that argument
That video just shows one thing , what ever you get arrested for either if you did the right or wrong thing, dont talk to the police. They can only make things work for you , they are not there to help you
AND DONT TALK TO REPORTERS
The fact that this dude straight up murdered someone and is still more concerned about the handicapping spot than he is about the life he took is just awful
135 likesReplies (2)
Hes a cop in his imaginary world, so he's just doing his imaginary job.
28 likes@David Reeding good description I like it
8 likesThat lawyer was laughably terrible lolool
0 likesOf course his daily carry is a g23
0 likesHis defense lawyers voice... need mute button. Lol
0 likes44:30 the 😦 face.
0 likesThe lawyer has a stupid point about the camera footage. Who cares that the camera is standard quality and doesn't show saturated colors. As far as I am concerned, a dude backing away without color is still a dude backing away.
1929 likesReplies (45)
A lawyer has a duty to his client to make the best possible case and exhaust every argument in their defence. It's a pretty rubbish point I'll agree, but while his client was pleading innocent he was right to make it.
128 likesJust as an example of what I think is the prosecution doing the same sort of thing - he talks about how he didn't shoot in the "toe foot knee calf thigh" etc etc but it is my understanding most gun self-defence experts will tell you that if you intend to stop someone you should aim centre of mass, and at that range its not going to veer off to hit a leg or a hand. And it is the prosecutions duty to exhaust all possible arguments so again he is right to make it.
34 likesthat's a lawyers job? defend the sometimes indefensible, which means using any arguments they have
13 likes@drysoup That apparently means dropping any kind of humanity for some. Defending such cases which such arguments, is nearly justifying what he did. Horrible in my opinion
11 likesDiceble ok then i wouldn't recommend being a lawyer..?
44 likes@drysoup I second this.
50 likesIt is the very nature of the US legal system, known as the adversarial system, to work in this way: A lawyer has a duty to give the best possible case for their client, and we have two lawyers to make the best possible for and against case. THAT then goes to an independent jury to decide guilt based on those arguments. THAT then goes to an experienced legal expert, the judge, to determine an appropriate sentence.
It can "feel" like a defence lawyer is protecting evil people if you assume someone is guilty, but the defence lawyer is part of the system to ensure justice and every part must do their best to ensure justice comes out the other end.
It is a foundational statement in US justice that is better to let ten guilty men go free than to punish an innocent man (Black Stone's ratio from Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765 and inherited by the US legal system) and that is why the defence lawyer must make the best possible case. To do anything else, literally any thing less than their very best, is to fail their duty to their client, to the citizens of the USA, and the very concept of justice.
Attorneys aren't required to always get their defendant off scot-free. Their duty is to provide the fairest trial possible. If that means grainy footage comes into question, then he has a responsibility to make that argument, however silly.
12 likesThat was his best defense there was literally nothing the lawyer couldve done
3 likesA dude backing away after assaulting another man and realizing his victim has an equalizer.
3 likes@Mark Farmer pushing someone away who is harrassing your wife and children isn't grounds to be killed, which is why the shooter is in prison. If the victim had pushed the shooter and then proceeded to continue attacking him, it might be a different story, but that's not what happened.
11 likesHe got shot within half a second of starting to back away, which wasn't enough time for the shooter to decide to risk his own life by allowing that thug to continue his attack. The THUG was indeed continuing to advance toward the shooter to continue the violent assault, and only STARTED to back away when the gun was pulled. The shooter was justified in fearing for his life.
6 likesHorrible lawyer
0 likes@b gilley Nah, the THUG who violently shoved the real victim is the one who initiated it. People are allowed to peacefully speak to other people, which is what the victim was doing when he was wrongfully attacked by the now dead thug.
1 like@James O'Blivion exactly, I don't understand why these people think that any physical confrontation automatically justifies a lethal response. It's scary to think that some of these same people are probably walking around armed. If the victim in this case had tried to beat the shooter while he was on the ground, then maybe a shooting would be justified. In this case though the victim was backing away and was executed in cold blood. Look at the way the shooter tracks him with his gun when he's running into the store, this is not the action of a man who's not in control of his actions.
10 likesb gilley I agree. And his face when the policeman told him that HIS victim was dead. He didn’t care AT ALL.
5 likesHe knew from the beginning that going towards a person and asking this person justification for whatever reason knowing he was NO ONE could have turned ugly. But he felt safe BECAUSE he had a gun. It is normal for him to go towards someone LESS than 21 feet from this person (when he went to the window of the woman’s car and even in front of her car), but when someone does the same : he has to shoot for his own safety. Wtf?
Even if the victim had kicked him or whatever (and it didn’t happen), it was not a reason to be killed.
AND it is said it’s not the first time his doing it. He was used to provoke people and show his gun when people got mad at HIS BEHAVIOUR!
If it was not for this family, this incident would have happen someday.
I can’t get how those people in the comments can defend a trash like him...
That guy belongs to jail. I hope he’s gonna be rotting there for life. He’s dangerous.
@Lily Ka's Vegan garden exactly, this guy had pulled his gun in road rage incidents multiple times before, he shouldn't have been allowed to legally carry. And yes, I'm sure if the races of the people in this shooting were reversed, these people would be calling the shooter a thug, and calling the victim a hero for defending his family. It's sick.
8 likes@Steven Gomez Sorry but shoving someone isn't grounds to be shot in cold blood, which is why the shooter is in jail. It's sick that you don't care at all about someone actually dying, but you're all bent out of shape over someone being shoved?
3 likes@Steven Gomez and again, you totally downplay the actions of the shooter, and attack the victim. The victim in this case did not start the altercation either, the shooter did. Anyone with half a brain knows that if you randomly start a verbal altercation with a woman in public, there's a significant chance you're going to anger her spouse or significant other who may be nearby, and yet you place no responsibility for starting the altercation on the shooter. And given the shooter's clear lack of judgement in this case, how can you be sure he wouldn't have ended up shooting the woman if the victim hadn't intervened and shoved him away? We also don't know what the shooter was saying to the woman, if he was being verbally threatening, then again, the victim would have had every right, both morally and legally, to push him away. Yet you act as if you know for certain the victim was morally wrong, when you don't even know key info on the case. Whether the victim was right or wrong for shoving the shooter, his act was at worse a misdemeanor, and should have been handled by law enforcement, what he did in no way warranted him being shot.
4 likesSD video footage is the only real defence they had left.
0 likesI was stunned when I saw the lawyer's argues that nonsense about the allegedly poor quality of the footage (which, for the purpose of the prosecution's case, was good enough). Quibbling about the quality of the footage? Really?! In such a case the entire focus of the defence should be on one thing and one thing alone: the self-defence argument.
0 likesI think the lawyer’s biggest mistake was his tone. He sounds condescending af, like he thinks he’s talking to a bunch of morons.
1 like@Raverly G But he didn't continue to attack, and he was backing away, which is why the shooter is in jail. Sorry but the possibility that someone might attack, when they are not in the process of attacking, and in fact are retreating, isn't grounds to execute them.
0 likesb gilley Thank you!
1 likeIt’s just the defendant’s attorney looking for literally any excuse at all to use to “prove” his client’s “innocence.”
0 likes@Andrew I totally agree, the shooter clearly had to know he could trigger a confrontation by verbally harrassing a woman and her children in a public place. As a gun carrier you have an increased responsibility to avoid creating any type of conflict, you absolutely cannot just go around picking fights and then shooting anyone who responds in a way that you don't like.
0 likes@Porkchop Periwinkle one, he pushed him from the side, not from behind. Two depending on the situation and what is being said, you absolutely can legally push someone who is verbally harrassing your wife. Two it doesn't matter even if the push was an unjustified assault, that doesn't give Drejka the right to execute a man in cold blood, which is why he's in jail.
1 like@Porkchop Periwinkle haha, yeah you're right, Drejka isn't rotting in jail, he's on some beach somewhere sipping a nice cocktail. Jesus you trolls get more delusional every day.
2 likes@Steven Gomez I'm glad you love it. I love your false equivalency. Smooches.
0 likes@Porkchop Periwinkle Guy, there's a term called excessive self-defence. Which basically means that you shouldn't punch someone in the face because of a shoulder pat, or shoot them because of being pushed. This is also brought up in the "The case of Michael Dunn" video on this channel. To narrow it down to when guns are in the picture you could generally say that you don't have the right to seriously harm or kill someone with a firearm when attacked/threatened as long as there's not enough reason to believe that the other party is actually capable of doing serious harm themselves. To apply this rule on this case. Since the victim was unarmed and therefore unable to seriously harm Drejka he didn't have enough reason to shoot the victim. Especially because the victim wasn't advancing towards Drejka.
1 like@Porkchop Periwinkle And you might say "well Drejka didn't know if the victim did or didn't have a gun". But if there is no indication of a gun or knife you should always start out from the assumption that the other person is unarmed. Because you as the armed person start out from a position of power against unarmed people and hold a responsibility to not use your weapon recklessly. You clearly haven't seriously studied the law so please stop talking from ignorance.
0 likes@Turquoise Cheetah actually it very much depends on what was being said. Freedom of speech doesn't apply to threatening someone. If Drejka was making threatening comments while standing in such close proximity to the victim's family, he would be absolutely within his rights to push Drejka away. So no, it isn't automatically an assault charge, it very much depends on the circumstances. For example what if Drejka had said something like "if you don't move this car I've got the firepower to fucking make you move it", or made some other reference to getting violent towards her or the child involved. In such a case the victim would absolutely be within his rights to push Drejka away from his family. On the other hand it could also be an assualt depending on what exactly was said and how Drejka was behaving, but even so it doesn't matter, Drejka still had no right to shoot the man, which is why he's in jail.
0 likes@Porkchop Periwinkle sorry but no, there are absolutely situations where it's ok to shove someone away from yourself or other people based on verbal threats. If someone comes up to you in a public place and begins threatening you and or your family for example, if you shove them away it's not necessarily a case of assault, it can be viewed as an act of self defense. You're assuming that in order to push someone away from yourself or your family they need to touch you first, this simply isn't true. And the scenarios I'm putting forth could absolutely apply to the case, because we don't know what Drejka said, there's no audio recording of the confrontation. Drejka literally has a history of threatening others in road rage incidents, with his gun, and you're going to pretend it's beyond the realm of possibility that he threatened these people in this case? How fucking dishonest can you get.
0 likes@Porkchop Periwinkle one, Drejka was shoved from the side, not from behind. Two you can't provide any law whatsoever that makes it illegal to shove someone away from yourself or your family if they are threatening them and you genuinely perceive them to be a danger to yourself and/or your family due to their threats. Three, no matter how you try to deflect and pass blame, even if this shove was an assault, it didn't give Drejka the right to then shoot the victim, because there was no further physical force used by the victim, and he was literally retreating when shot. You act like you care so much about the law, yet you can't even process the fact that this wasn't a justified shooting, even with stark video evidence, and a guilty verdict.
0 likes@Porkchop Periwinkle The deceased pushing Drejka is indeed an excessive response as long as Drejka wasn't threatening the victim, which indeed we don't know and would have a decent chance on landing the victim an assault case depending on the circumstances (Depends typically on the state laws, police & how hurt Drejka would have gotten if he had fallen to the ground). This however doesn't mean the shooting from Drejka wasn't an excessive response either and therefore excessive self-defence. A counter response can also be excessive and since lethal force weighs far heavier than non-lethal force the victim would most likely be aquitted if he had survived the shooting since the jury would most likely not find him guilty. The fact that the victim pushed as you said "Drejka into combat"(although I'm personally of the opinion that simply pushing someone doesn't already constitute a fight) doesn't mean this gives Drejka a free card to push the situation into deadly combat. So even though you argue that the victim is also in the wrong this doesn't negate that Drejka is guilty. This would only be applicable on the length of his sentence, not whether he'd get a sentence.
0 likes@J T Your racial insecurity is showing
0 likesBut but but... the wavy lines tho
0 likes@Lily Ka's Vegan garden, Completely agree with you, I’m very happy this dude ended up in jail. But I do think it was wrong that the father shoved this guy. He could of confronted him in a verbal manner and not a physical one. But that does not mean this dude should of shot his aggressor. Especially since he backed up as soon as he pulled out his gun.
0 likesNow my family is wondering why I am laughing at 6 in the morning like I am mental.
0 likesHe absolutely infuriated me, especially with the part where he said "a man's life has been taken, don't take another man's life away", maybe no lives would be fucked if Michael minded his own business or EVEN BETTER hadn't killed the poor guy!!! now he needs to pay for his actions
0 likesI dont get why a jury of average people get to make these decisions, there are so many people convinced by stupid defense like that. Its basically giving regular schmucks to be manipulated when a judge can make an informed opinion.
0 likes@Porkchop Periwinkle Like I said in my previous comment. It doesn't matter that Drejka was pushed from behind. Like a normal person he should have assumed from the start that the other person was unarmed unless he had found reasonable counter observations that the guy was armed. As long as there's no indication that someone is armed you should assume the person won't use lethal force against you. And the guy wasn't even in punching range from him when Drejka finally shot. Drejak should first have assessed the situation before shooting, which he either negligently or deliberately didn't do. Either of which would lend him a guilty verdict since his gross negligence would still lend him a damning case. You can say "oh but it was in the spur of a heated moment" but you lose your freedom of acting in the spur of the moment the moment you bought your gun since that's the moment you became obligated to not recklessly use your firearm.
0 likes@Alec I never once mentioned race. If you hear the word "thug" and immediately think "black person," then YOU are the racist.
0 likes@reticent Such eloquence.
0 likes@Crusader1089 I don't think he was arguing that the drejka should've aimed for a non-lethal area, he was saying that the shot was perfect, which would be much harder to do and less likely to happen if he truly thought his life was in immediate danger and was injured like he claimed.
0 likesThe lawyer saw the interrogation and was like FFS MAN we gotta pull some elaborate shit from our arse...and then failed hahaha
0 likeshe looks like a coward lol
2 likesReplies (1)
no wait this is Micah Bell
0 likesThose cops know sure as shit what a force multiplier is
0 likesReplies (1)
Only cops in movies say that cringe
1 likeThis is murder to me
1 likeWhy does this stuff fascinate me?
0 likesMichael: it’s illegal for you to park there!!!”
1771 likesAlso Michael: illegally parks to confront her
Replies (11)
"It's illegal for you to park there!"
241 likes*𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐦𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫
if it was good enough for her it was good enough for him.
3 likeshey can i have some ketchup i heard you were the ketchup maker
4 likes@marvingardens
8 likes“hey you can’t park there!”
commits several ethnic cleansings
@marvingardens manslaughter**
0 likes@Fuz ah yes when shooting someone on the torso you never mean to kill
2 likesSerious question though... would the man who was shot / the woman recieve a parking ticket in this situation?
1 like@Bowser Houdini you get fined a lot for using the spots if caught
2 likes@Safia B. i keep it all
1 like@Bowser Houdini they said she moved her car so she must have thought so
2 likes@Bowser Houdini Yes definitely, better than dead tho... Specially dead by a """"vigilante""""
0 likesI’m a bit late to this video but what about his complete disregard of firing a gun towards the store? Lucky nobody else got hit too
0 likesWhat a killer
0 likesi swear the comments be the funniest shit in all these vids 😂
0 likesSoooo it wasn't about race?
0 likesHe’s really milking that arm “injury” as much as he can.
1666 likesReplies (20)
I see I'm not the only one who thinks that. 👍
32 likesThat sling he made out of his shirt had me cracking up
79 likes@B Sheppard wait that's his SHIRT?? holy fuck I didn't realise
29 likes🤣
3 likesshirt sleeve FORCE MULTIPLIER
17 likesWhen he was moving his arms around while the officers were out of the room the first time...
12 likesRight - the way he (later) demonstrated the cupping of the gun and pointing with his "injured" arm fully extended?
9 likesIsn't that the injury from his wood chopping job? Idk just asking
1 likeHe's milking everything as much as he can
10 likes@KowalSky nah he said he landed on that arm, and "hurt" his wrist because the gun was in his pants and when he fell his wrist was between the gun and the concrete
4 likesYou can literally see him playing it up like big-time. Wook at my widdle big injuwy.
4 likes@ThunderstruckMedia : Haha that had me laughing. I bet he's the type of guy to say that unironically.
1 like@B Sheppard lol, i thought he was given it by the cops. you can see him push himself off the floor to get up with that arm, yet he has his own made up sling. I hope this was used in court to demostrate his ability of deception.
1 likeI sprained my wrist at work, I couldn't even pick up a shopping bag. I would grimace every time I inadvertently grabbed something heavy
Right 100%, but I mean that guy did rock his world when getting pushed
1 like@KowalSky that’s why he’s retired, I think He’s being a baby about his arm cuz the guy who got shot rocked his world before being shot so he probably fell on it pretty hard
1 like@Angie Sin : I can't tell if you think he deserved to be pushed or not. I hope you do think that push was justified.
1 like@Robin C oh my goodness of course he deserved to be pushed Im just saying yes he didn’t need to go that extent to put his arm in his shirt and be dramatic about it and be so calm about everything but he did get his shit rocked and probably fell on it pretty hard I’m glad he got that push in before what happened...I wish he could’ve done more and I wish people aren’t so fucked to just pull a gun out on a man and shoot him over something so unnecessary it’s absolutely terrible I feel so much and I send all my love to his family and to the people who loved him dearly and he did not deserve what happened to him
2 likes@Angie Sin : I just wasn't sure from your comment but yeah, I agree 100%.
1 likecos he's the REAL victim.
1 likeHAPPY 1984 😂😂😂
1 likeTwo arrogant people met and it didn’t end well for either.
0 likesWhy were they in the handicap spot tho
0 likes48:11 WTF is with the guys eyes in the Background. Omg
0 likesHahaha Al Shaprton. What a tool
0 likesThis guy wanted to get into a confrontation and wanted to shoot someone. I would guess that he routinely fantasized about it. He didn't want to go to prison though. A person like this sees a "stand your ground" law as a way to kill someone and get away with it. He set up the entire series of events and made it happen. Maybe he didn't know exactly when it would happen or who he would kill. But he was wandering the neighborhood accosting people while carrying a gun. He was getting a little thrill from being able to act like he owned the town, and waiting for a chance to kill.
303 likesReplies (9)
is this an example of "Folie a Deux" ?
1 likeso awful
1 likeThat is not how stand your ground laws work. Stand your ground laws allow an individual to use lethal force in very select circumstances such as a forcible criminal sexual assault, a homicide, a forcible rape, a burglary, a kidnapping, or a robbery. Outside of those specific circumstances an individual is REQUIRED to withdraw from the situation and communicate that they have withdrawn as long as they are able to unless the individual is in their own home. This is the difference between a stand your ground law and castle doctrine. Castle doctrine makes it so that an individual does not have to retreat from their own home if they believe that their life is in danger from a third party.
4 likesAll I can say is - he picked a good target.
2 likesSpot on. And these kind of vigilantes are infuriating. But he’s obviously a very damaged person too we mustn’t forget.
1 likeWe call this the andy warski defense
1 likeVapid Toast I remember an old boy in the close I grew up in called old George. He was a pilot of a Lancaster bomber. But he was like that and used to chase us for being cheeky.
0 likes@KR Standridge I never once said that McGlockton should have been shot. The purpose of my comment was to show that a stand your ground law is not a way to get away with killing someone because it doesn't apply in the vast majority of cases.
0 likes@Alexander Carder who was more damaging? The person using words to talk about the parking spot....or the dude who ran up to someone and pushed them on the ground? Mouth breather
2 likesParamedics arrived after 90 minutes
0 likes...
This is not legitimate defense with such a lack of proportionality
0 likesMr. Paul Blart, parking lot cop over here
0 likesIf they hadn't taken a handicapped spot or the victim hadn't assaulted the shooter, none of this would have happened. Shooting the assailant at that distance after the assault ended looks unnecessary though.
0 likesReplies (3)
It was none of Drejka's business. If he hadn't confronted them then none of this would've happened.
3 likesSo the victim wasn't supposed to be defending his wife from a threatening man??
0 likes@S Fooshy The deceased impulsively knocked Drejka to the ground without warning. The "wife" was in the car behind a closed door. The unstable Drejka was triggered and we know the result. A verbal argument with Drejka would likely not have been fatal but the deceased upped the ante by turning things physical.
0 likesMy husband and I once parked at a stork/family parking 2 weeks after my c-section while my son was still in the NICU. I was just going to pick up some items from the store for him. A woman and her husband saw me going back to the car (my husband was still inside paying for stuff. I had to go in the car first cause I was starting to feel uncomfortable) and this woman and her husband starting yelling at me because I neither looked pregnant nor did they see a baby. Wouldn’t even let me explain, I was on the verge of passing out and had to sit down and they wouldn’t let me in the car. They tried to call the cops until I a worker came up to me with my husband and argued with them. They wouldn’t leave until the store employee threatened to call the cops on them.
2304 likesIdk why people like this exist.
Replies (80)
I'm so sorry that happened to you, I know if it were me, I'd be so emotional about that confrontation. (Embarrassed, angry, physical pain) I've had three. Sounds like you have a good man that stood up for you though! They should have felt like jerks and apologized. I've had 3 c sections, they are tough, major abdominal surgery!
98 likesAs if that was something worth calling the cops for in the first place. How absurd.
11 likes@Nic B
99 likesThey very clearly said it was not handicapped parking, so why would you assume that?
@Nic B
66 likesNope, you do not need a permit to park in stork/parenting parking. Disabled parking =/= parenting parking, in any way.
You fail both at reading and at knowing what you're talking about.
yeah this woman and her husband don’t have any right talking to you and you don’t owe them any explanation. just because you don’t look pregnant doesn’t mean you don’t reserve the right to use that parking spot. a perfect example of you haven no idea what kinda shit someone else is going through just by looking at them. i’m sorry you went through that.. i don’t know why they wouldn’t let you in the car, either, it seems ridiculous that they’re simultaneously telling you to get out of the parking spot, but also blocking your way to the car??????
29 likes@Nic B meh, people come up to folks with legitimate handicap placards and yell at them if they don’t look disabled enough.
40 likesSigned,
A person with a dad who had his first heart attack at age 48 and definitely would have died from it had he not been in the hospital already when he had it, who (due to his surgery and now compromised heart function) now needs a handicap placard. I distinctly recall one time where my dad parked in a handicap spot as normal, and proceeded to walk with the rest of us who were all in the car to the restaurant for dinner. My dad’s handicap is not immediately visible. Hence, one entitled couple decided to tell us off for parking there when we clearly didn’t need it. We shot back at them with “He’s had heart surgery. We can have him lift up his shirt to prove it to you.”
Luckily that shut them up but some aren’t so lucky.
@Nic B also, where the hell do you live with stork signs that say you need a permit? Lol
34 likes@PianoDisneygal10 i'm so glad your dad was ok!!
10 likes@Nic B you don’t care about random people’s stories, yet…you cared enough to try and take this commenter down a few pegs 🙃 whoops.
49 likes@Nic B you sure seem to care about random people’s stories when you think you know better and can “educate” people on the law or whatever the hell it is you’re trying to do. But then when someone else brings along another story that talks about people acting like how you just did (inappropriately telling people where they can or cannot park based on perceived eligibility), you suddenly don’t care.
33 likes@Nic B you can comment but not when you then go and say “I don’t care about rando internet person stories” after just criticizing a rando internet person’s actions in their rando internet person’s story. 😉
33 likes@Nic B you cared enough to tell her she was wrong to park there. When in actuality, you have zero clue if that’s true. Where I live, stork parking permits aren’t a thing. They’re on the honor system. And new mothers who are still recovering from a c section can certainly park there sans baby. No cop is gonna come and arrest somebody for parking there because it isn’t illegal to do so under any circumstances where I live. Maybe the OP also lives in a place like that.
27 likesSo, yes, your opinion on the rightness or wrongness of the OP’s actions is literally your perception, even by your own definition of how perception works. Because you don’t have the whole story or all of the answers.
@Nic B lol, I’m on the high horse, okay
23 likes@Nic B You kinda missed the part where she was literally recovering from a C Section, and was physically weak. I guarantee that baby parking, or whatever the fuck it’s called is specifically for new mothers, baby or not; because as it turns out, childbirth is an extremely painful and draining experience, more so if they have to use surgery to get the baby out.
32 likesAlso, if it’s in America, I guarantee there was no permit required like a handicap placard. Literally everything other than handicap parking is usually just done by the store, and goes off the honor system that someone wouldn’t lie about needing a space closer to the store. So, getting mad because some internet stranger took a parking spot that they needed, that wasn’t against the law, is kinda… pointless. It’s not like her story is going to embolden people to park in the pram parking or whatever because they hate new mothers.
But I’m sure you know that, and are just trolling in the most obtuse and circular way possible. That’s at least what it seems like, and you’re not even good at it, because you just keep repeating the same dumb shit over and over.
@Dornpunzel does that justify shooting people who have parked illegally because you got into a fight you had no business getting into?
15 likes@Dornpunzel Be careful before you do something stupid that you will regret. You become the guy who escalates minor inconveniences into shouting matches or even physical violence and still thinks he is in the right.
5 likes@Nic B it’s pretty rich you telling someone to get off their high horse when you’ve legit been acting like stork/family parking is the most important thing in the world. As far as I’m concerned, if a permit isn’t required to park there, it’s a free spot. There’s legit zero legal requirement to park there. It’s a courtesy spot only. There has never been a permit, requirement, nor fine for parking in stork/family parking and never will. Wanna know why, because it’s literally considered a courtesy spot by the companies that place them there. However there’s no legal standing or authoritative body that can tell you to move or punish you for using it. It’s the same idea as the larger toilet stall for older or handicapped people, ideally you shouldn’t use it if you have another option, but no one can prevent you, fine you, or detain you from using it as it is only a courtesy. It’s absurd to judge a new mother for using the spot especially when there’s no one vying for it or in need of it in that moment.
16 likes@Nic B “Mothers recovering from c section shouldn’t be driving”
14 likesWho said OP was?
Would I be annoyed? Maybe, but more than likely, I’d hardly be paying attention and policing whether or not someone actually needs to be parking there. Definitely would never dream of directly confronting them.
@Nic B OP was likely in a grey area where she was fit to leave her house, but wasn’t driving and still was very much recovering from major surgery. People don’t just suddenly cease to have needs to go out shopping for stuff while recovering.
14 likesAlso as someone else pointed out to you, stork parking isn’t like a legally regulated thing like handicap parking. So…it really is just a parking spot with a fancy sign. It is not legally enforceable to get someone to move from there. You should be wondering why the confronters of the OP were threatening to call the cops lol.
@Vitorruy1 I know what you mean, buddy. This is why i ALWAYS kept calm and silent in tense situations in real life. Even tho sometimes i felt like regretting this since i was upset afterwards for months and asked myself why i let other people shout at me for no reason.
0 likes@PianoDisneygal10 Absolutely not of course. As mentioned: He had the right to pull his gun to defend himself but pulling the trigger showed that he not fired because of self defense but more out of being angry/mad or tired of being pushed around. I guess both did wrong and paid the price.
0 likes@Nic B never said that you said that. But you’re acting like it is, because you basically sided with the people that were confronting the OP. Anyways, I can tell you just want to be argumentative, and this is exhausting. I’ll let you have the final word if you wish.
7 likes@Nic B why do stork people get a special place to park? They are the ones that got to have the fun. Now I have to listen to their screaming monsters when I go shopping 3 years later. I park sideways in stork spots
3 likes@Nic B So, why did you, a commenter, as after watching a video, feel obliged to argue in the comment section for unrelated causes, with multiple assumptions, even though you clearly need not get out of anyone's way - the people who “yelled” at you obviously feel justified in questioning in other's experiences, understandably so from your own point of view, without considering the world is vastly different from whatever place you're from. It wouldn't hurt to use a period and get off your high horse.
5 likesI'm sure you deserved to get called out for not having anything to prove that you can use the parking lot, but yelling, blocking you from getting in the car, and attempting to call the cops... That's just harassment.
1 like@Nic B Holy shit dude, you're exactly like the people that end up in these videos.
11 likes@Nic B There's a reason why Nic B commented to the OP like they did, and by the looks of it they certainly realize who/what they are. 17 days.....17 days of them acting like a keyboard warrior. love it
6 likes@Nic B There it is! so damn predictable, I may not know you but I know what type of person you are. So awesome how this works LOL
10 likes@Nic B LOL Nicolas stop. Please its too much
8 likes@Nic B she was in stork/ family parking.
4 likesShe was called karen.
2 likes@Nic B Do you have nothing better to do than get up in arms over a youtube comment? Scrolling through and seeing how many times you’ve replied makes me feel like you need to go touch some grass or something
5 likes@Nic B If you think it took any more time out of my day to write that comment than it does yours then your are mistaken
2 likesI'm curious why people confront people over this. Just take a cell photo and turn it in. Confronting people will only lead to escalation. So don't be surprised if someone delivers you several ham sandwiches.
4 likesPeople like that get on my nerves. Mind your business. Trying to play cop, judge, and executioner.
1 like@Nic B his staring does not make sense. Why should he care or anyone for that matter? What does he have to gain but waste my time? Point is people need to mind their business. Period.
5 likes@Nic B what reality is, is that I can’t stop someone from staring, looking as reality is I can’t control people obviously . The difference between myself and that person (for all intensive purpose) who stared, got upset for no reason is the point. I wouldn’t. Reality is some people put themselves into a precarious situation and instigate it when they don’t need to. Staring or recording fine but to further escalate from a position of being passive on up is what I’m talking about. There’s a thing called “ownage” where some people think that they own people they come into contact with, with words and gestures and also directive(s).
6 likesYou don’t know someone from atom. You don’t know what the are holding, if he or she is crazy etc. and yet and still force your way into their life disingenuously. That’s a no.
I can record someone as well as you can, (as I assume you did a background check on me) but if I were to go into their AO, as I don’t care what does that make me!? If I walked pass someone’s car (and I am disabled) and I don’t see a placard (mind you I don’t care) I don’t have dog in the fight. Now I have confronted someone for parking in a disabled spot why? Because I needed to park and because that affected me. There’s a difference.
Trouble makers
0 likesMurika for you
0 likes@Nic B you’re right. I could have could have been passive but I’m not. I detest when people stare for instance and not nod or say hi or hello or how are you. That’s rude. Going back to the guy, he was pacing and staring. There’s more to this story though but I just gave you a glimpse.
2 likesStory in short. He stares and looks all over the front of the car. As you mentioned and we know why. Searching half desperately for a placard. He goes inside the building and complains. Setting off a chain reaction to others. Comes back outside and does the same thing. I pull the window down and ask “the heck are you looking at..”
he asks about the placard and I ask “have you checked the back of the car?” He does and his suspicion is now quelled. Meanwhile the people inside who heard his complain started to wonder as they know him and probably trust him. They become suspicious about me and wonder. We are outside talking about misunderstandings while the manager inside become upset because no one quelled his suspicions based on the guy’s complaint. The guy leaves and I go inside and was confronted (chain reaction). The manager and I talk about it and once again I had to quell his suspicions. We talk and talk until my wife shows up, saying she was worried because our daughters’ class was over 10 minutes ago. The teacher called. Distracted, my phone was left in the car talking to a complete and utter stranger. While talking to the manager I could see my daughter dancing and playing and thought nothing of it. Was harmless. My wife saw on the news that there was a car accident and was worried that we could have been in it. She was relieved when she saw me.
Now. Do you see how one person being a somewhat parking vigilante could cause a chain reaction for so many people. A complete stranger who I will never see again probably and serve 0 purpose in my life affected at least myself + 6 other people in a manner of 20 minutes and for what? What was the outcome to his query? Why? What purpose did it serve? But to relinquish his own “personal” insecurities and or past about people parking in a handicap space with a placard not showing? When he couldn’t take the time as the video showed to look around the entire car? What then? Would he still complain after seeing plates that it wasn’t warranted or still complain that or as you put it “supposed to be hung from the mirror so that it can be seen fore and aft”.
Tell me what was the end goal. You see it was a selfish move by that guy and I will never know the back story to it. Meaning, there must have been a past story as to the ultimate “trigger”.
Referring to inviting potential confrontation is actually being the antagonist. The guy was.
Scenario: he could have just walked past the car and went home.
Or: (his actions) created an inescapable situation where a person has to be involved. What if he called the police? Invited you say to this confrontational party, sorry my guy. That was something I preferred to stay away from but I will oblige rude and disrespectful people and THAT I do not need an invitation for. I’m buying drinks for that party/roast/confrontation.
Make excuses for him all you want. The point is and will every be. Mind yo damn business. (Unless there is a direct threat to self and others) otherwise he wa just a male Karen. Hopeless and alone, not a single life and probably full of disparity. Wanting, thriving the need to feel important and heard. To be seen as some people stay hidden from others. Knowing that time is against him in life.
Some sad shit after you deconstruct it. Thoughts?
@Nic B also also. You don’t have to know someone to read them to tell and possibly predict their future outcome(s). Live life long enough to gain a 3rd/4th eye based off of countless unbiased experiences with various people. The point is mastering to “read” people. Body language, response, eye contact, mannerisms, etc. etc. etc. good talk though.
1 like@Nic B thank you for that also. I’m an intellect and I indulge in adult conversations. Thank you for being persistent and articulate. There are many people especially on YT that are quick to insult, shame etc. and do not possess or can construct a simple dialect but feel the need to be right based on their own opinion(s) and not the views of others: especially to things/situations that he or she has no direct impact in. Not. A. Dog. In. The. Fight as you will. I appreciate the back and forth sir!
1 like@Nic B It's always hilarious when a narcissist tells other people to get of their high horse. Just let the woman park wherever she wants, if she is close to passing out. If you disagree you're nothing but a psychopath. Get lost.
3 likesI'm so sorry. I have a disability that affects my mobility on different days. I have a disability placard and just because I can walk on some days I've been accused of having a fake placard and had the cops called on me.
1 likeBecause they dont want their country to be like nicaragua. and when you come live among them you live by their rules and not bring your 3rd world lawlessness
1 like@Nic B So you think it was right that the couple prevented that poor woman from entering her vehicle?
3 likesThey wouldn’t even let her sit down.
America is surely a scary place, I've never seen people like that here.
0 likes@Nic B ok Karen
3 likes@Nic B didn’t ask
5 likes@Nic B also your response was really cringe
5 likes@PianoDisneygal10 bro your beating his ass lmaooo
2 likes@Ohmykitten Give me your autograph👏👏👏👏
2 likes@Racmaster00 You sir get the "good person" award
1 like@M STL king shit
0 likes@Racmaster00 You know what's cringeworthy? Trying to shut down a conversation with the words "OK Karen". Instantly makes you look like an edgy 14 year old, regardless of whether or not you're in the right.
0 likes@Ivar The Boneless cool?
2 likes@Racmaster00 That's the point. You aren't.
0 likesSo sorry that happened to you. The world is cruel. We live in a modern dark age. Please take care.
0 likes@Ivar The Boneless oh damn look at you go
0 likesI’m sorry to hear you went through this. Healing after a c section is very painful and I got lightheaded and tired easily for a month afterwards. I hope your son is healthy.
0 likesDon't think he had a c section.
1 like@Michael Beattie True lol
0 likesI think people that make a big deal out of someone using disabled parking are deep down really just jealous they don’t get to use it. Otherwise why do they care so much. I doubt they are just concerned for all the “real “ disabled people. What I see most of the time is all the disabled parking is left empty at the front of the store and no one is using it so it’s just going to waste.
1 like@Nic B I’m sorry I didn’t read every single one of your comments, sheesh. Also, we only received the perspective of the OP. Based on her explanation, which isn’t very complicated. It’s clear that the stork parking was permit based (and literally none of them are because it would be 100% pointless to do so, furthermore, they’re put there by the companies, not mandated by legislation). My point is I don’t see why you’re arguing against the OP in the first place. What she did isn’t illegal, or even unethical, it seems like you just wanted to argue for the basis of arguing only as there isn’t a resolution. You say you’ve been alluding to what I said, but you did it in such a roundabout and obtuse way. If that’s what you meant then just say it.
1 likeAw, I'm sorry that happened to you. Some people are insane and cruel.
1 liked
0 likesI don't know why such people have to appoint themselves as law monitors like the community needs their services. Hopefully you and your family are well and have recovered from this.
1 like@Nic B but think about this it doesn’t warrant a fight even if there not allowed to park not there job to enforce that
1 like@Nic B She literally explained in her original comment that she parked in a "just had a baby" parking spot... BECAUSE SHE JUST HAD A BABY.
2 likes@Nic B wrong
1 likeBecause these are demon possessed people.
1 likeThese people are bitter and antisocial. Karen's. They have nothing better to do with their time.
1 likeJust white people things lol
0 likesSo because I got shot twice and survived, and am still recovering from my surgeries a month later, can I park in a handicapped spot?
0 likes@Nic B So to you "stork / family parking" is the same as parking for disabled ?? Then I guess in that parking lot there were no spots marked for disabled, as they would be the "stork / family parking" ones, right ?
0 likesPeople like this exist because if we tell people that they can harass other citizens - even preventing someone from entering their car like in your case - and nobody is allowed to even touch them while they do the harassing - a lot of wannabe alpha, frustrated losers will be very happy to jump on that opportunity.
0 likesYour case is quite different from the video though.
Obviously the shooter is a coward who first engages because he only sees a woman and children, and then draws the classic coward's preferred weapon - a gun, meant to hit from a distance - as soon as he receives one push even though the other guy was not following it up and instead was getting farther.
This is voluntary homicide to me, there is no way the shooter had valid reasons to think his life was in danger if he didn't shoot.
But the victim was not blameless like you were. For starters they had chosen to park in a space reserved for handicapped persons despite there being other spots available right there. Big red flag. Plus he pushed the guy while the guy was not looking - not a very manly approach - and while the guy was just talking. This is very different from a woman who had a C-section 2 weeks earlier and needs to sit in her car as she is on the verge of passing out.
Doesn’t matter. You’re not legally allowed to park there without a placard
0 likesThat's awful. I'm sorry you had to go through that.
1 like@Nic B So you are admitting that this "Nic B" personality you display here in the comments of a youtube video does not even exist.
1 likeYou are pretending just to start pointless discussions with random people on the inernet.
Maybe you should go out to a barber - there you have someone to talk to in real life.
Need a duos partner?
0 likesRevelation 20 And I saw an angel coming down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit, and a great chain in his hand.
0 likes2 And he laid hold on the dragon the old serpent, which is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.
3 And he cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should no more seduce the nations, till the thousand years be finished. And after that, he must be loosed a little time.
4 And I saw seats; and they sat upon them; and judgment was given unto them; and the souls of them that were beheaded for the testimony of Lord God Jesus, and for the word of Lord God, and who had not adored the beast nor his image, nor received his character on their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Lord God Christ a thousand years.
5 The rest of the dead lived not, till the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection. In these the second death hath no power; but they shall be priests of Lord God and of Lord God Christ; and shall reign with him a thousand years.
7 And when the thousand years shall be finished, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and shall go forth, and seduce the nations, which are over the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, and shall gather them together to battle, the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.
8 And they came upon the breadth of the earth, and encompassed the camp of the saints, and the beloved city.
9 And there came down fire from Lord God out of heaven, and devoured them; and the devil, who seduced them, was cast into the pool of fire and brimstone, where both the beast
10 And the false prophet shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
11 And I saw a great white throne, and one sitting upon it, from whose face the earth and heaven fled away, and there was no place found for them.
12 And I saw the dead, great and small, standing in the presence of the throne, and the books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged by those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and hell gave up their dead that were in them; and they were judged every one according to their works.
14 And hell and death were cast into the pool of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life, was cast into the pool of fire.
Hopefully McGlockton learned his lesson!
2 likeswhy r there so many Michaels on this channel should we be worried
0 likesim so glad not to live in the us
0 likesThis is the kind of guy to pull a citizen's arrest on a jay walker
4911 likesReplies (45)
Can't stand people like him.
136 likesKARENious Maximus
53 likesWish it had been that simple.
8 likeshe is not a bad guy i don't think he should of gotten that long
5 likes@stevan saucedo id say well dad ya fucked up
6 likesTo be fair they were taking a spot away from a potentially disabled person
14 likesMarelody ehhhh... is that really a reason to shoot and kill someone...
153 likes@Young minds podcast anyone who draws a weapon on someone after being pushed, said person who pushed you backed off and then you still choose to fire then you are in fact a bad guy who deserves to be off the street because you are a threat to people around you.
115 likesliller definitely not. I’m just saying that it’s kinda an asshole thing to do. But this guy went way way too far
8 likes“He’s not a bad guy” Did you turn your ears off at 36:40 were it’s proven he pulled a gun on 4 other people AND he was the antagonists in those situations?!
76 likes@Young minds podcast Bro, this guy was a public menance this was the 5 recorded incident of him pulling a gun out on someone 2 of the previous people were unarmed women. I think he's been dying for an excuse to shoot someone for a long time and he finaly put himself in a situation where he thought he'd get away with it.
44 likesOne of the comments here was made by a Smooth brain
9 likesThe guy who he shot wasn’t even the one who parked there! He was literally a concerned father/ husband who saw a man extremely close to his family and shoved him away. So all this “ to be fair he was parked in the handicapped parking spot“ is bullshit
22 likes@HanZ Bananz plus she was in the vehicle and could have moved the car or got her man to do it. It's not the end of the world, an inconvenience but not life ending worthy.
11 likesVagabond_Charlie the “physical assault” was being lightly pushed over because he was getting too close to his wife and yelling at her. Not a reason to shoot someone at all
16 likesVagabond_Charlie sure, but that doesn’t mean he had a right to shoot an unarmed man, he had no weapon and just shoved him god damn
5 likesstevan saucedo well I would hope my dad would have enough sense to not shove a crazy guy on the ground
3 likesMarelody ... No. because there were plenty empty spots closer to the door. The guy was a wannabe enforcer. Not to mention with a disability sticker you can park on roof of a house and no one will ticket you. While it's true ppl are assholes for taking up those spaces it did not prevent anyone from accessibility.
10 likesProbably make a citizens arrest for walking on his pavement and breathing
1 like@Young minds podcast why dafuq u lyin'?
3 likes@HanZ Bananz "extremely close", she was in a car, she basically could just drive away lol. This is the situation of a crazy gun freak, a probable Karen and an aggressive man having a dispute together. Karen escalates a dispute , aggressive man becomes violent and crazy cold blooded gun freak has been waiting on a moment to pull a trigger and kill someone..
2 likes@el not a reason definitely, but it is not lightly being pushed, this is really lightly being pushed and look what consequences it can have if you happen to fall on your head https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR5tIELdM-g. It was undeniably an aggressive move to go there and push him over immediately. He didn't had to get shot for it which was unnecessary and over exaggerated in the situation but the victim was far from an innocent father, he resolved immediately to violence.
1 like@Tom Anderson gun laws are much tighter than that. At least in larger cities. Like Chicago, and see how well gun laws work there. The real problem is this “see something say something” mentality we have developed since 9/11. This guy didn’t need to start shit over a parking spot. It was a convenience store, every single spot at the store is closer to the door than the handicapped spots you find at Walmart.
0 likesthis is gold. I witnessed some lady get hit while jaywalking. The driver called the cops driver was off the hook and she was hit with a ticket for jaywalking and a big Hospital Bill.
0 likes@Tom Anderson In US you have to be 18 to have a gun, but you can own a car at 16. So your murders will have to be vehicular manslaughter for a couple years before you can get a gun. This guy's permit should've been revoked due to the previous incidents. I'm not sure the process to revoke an owner's permit.
0 likes@Lukkaboc You can buy yourself a gun before you can buy a pint, lol. Why do people even NEED guns anyway? I certainly get along fine without. As does much of the developed world's population
4 likes@Marelody so kill them? Huh seems really balanced
0 likes@Tom Anderson no, that's not accurate. In many states you have to be 21 unless it's with a hunting license or as a member of law enforcement, like my state of Florida, where even for longarms one must be 21 unless their a member of law enforcement or military service.
0 likes@Marelody is punishable by death?
0 likes@Mike Mc so your dad wouldn't defend your family from a crazy dude he doesn't know yelling at his girlfriend and two kids?
3 likeslike mine your business did you see all those empty parking spots 😭
0 likesOr a hall pass monitor
0 likesFax
0 likes@Young minds podcast it’s not like he’s had multiple arrests or anything
0 likes@Truthsoldier cant stand people that park in handicap spots because they feel entitled.
0 likes@el ehhhhh is a verbal argument really enough of a reason to shove that man to the ground like that? They all made poor choices and they all have to deal with the consequences that's life. The only victims are the children its really that simple I don't feel sorry for any of them.
0 likes@Tom Anderson bud you have to be 21 to have a handgun first off... Secondly you don't see 16 year old's walking around with shotguns and rifles in 99% of the country. People like you believe the media the same media that wants guns banned and that's the only problem America has. We have so much corrupt media and biased media and it doesn't help that liberals own social media.... Sorry bud but I've never heard gunshots outside at night meanwhile most people around me have firearms. Most of these shootings take place in areas with laws that prevent law abiding citizens from defending themselves. Heck most of these mass shootings are really just gang related shootings but saying we have thousands of mass shootings a year sounds better especially when you can try and associate mass shootings with straight white men which happen to be the enemy in this country right now.
0 likesEventually things will change and social media sites etc will get proper regulations that they deserve that away they cant keep pedaling BS while claiming fake news and linking CNN as the source I mean really.... How bias do you have to be to call a tweet fake news and then use a CNN article as a legitimate unbias source not some bias media company.
@Taco King it was justified, video evidence showed exactly what happened, he got pushed fell to the ground black father didn't go charging at him to pummel him while on the ground after he pushed, him guy pulled gun black father proceeded to back up and he fired anyways. He got charged and convicted cause what he did was wrong. You can boohoo about it all day doesn't change the fact he got punished rightly for his actions
1 like@HanZ Bananz havent read the whole chain yett, but to be fair, he wasn't "extremely close" to his family. as the man walked up he was more than an armslength from the vehicle, SHE got out, removing the door as a defense, the drive away option, and closing the distance, so the shove was not justified. The shot was also NOT justified and I support the verdict.
1 like@el manslaughter, not murder
0 likes@Properly Gaming to be fair, the man did approach him after he went down, it was after he noticed his hand that he started to back away. The shove wasn't justified, the draw WAS 100% justified, the SHOT was not justified, and I fully support the verdict. Had he fired several shots I would have supported a second degree verdict.
1 like@75ur15 I meant he wasn't charging in to start pummeling the man whilst he was on the ground. He took a step forward and looked like he was asking him something. Probably "why the fuck are you berating my wife"
0 likes@Marelody Well, Mr. Michael just committed a far worse crime than parking in the handicapped spot
0 likesWhy is nobody mentioning the fact that the victim parked in a handicap spot?
1 likeListen, I'm not justifying him being shot but I hate arrogant people who just think they can do anything they want - with an "IDGAF" attitude, such as parking in a disabled parking spot when they're not disabled. These types of people are scumbags.
He did not deserve to be shot over this but unfortunately, he crossed somebody who was a little more arrogant than him that day and paid the consequences.
Sorry but both the suspect and the victim can kiss my *
Funniest shit
0 likesState vs. Civilian. It seems only normal that state prosecutor has way better suit than the defence attorney???
0 likesThe thing about fake jakes is that they never shut the hell up and enjoy digging theirselves into holes
0 likes19 minutes for paramedics to arrive???
0 likesAll he had to do is not talk
0 likesI physically cringed every time he said “negative” and I feel like the cop did, too.
145 likesReplies (1)
The worst was when he used "Force Multiplier" a military term. Like clearly this guy has watched too many movies
18 likesRevelation 17 And there came one of the seven angels, who had the seven vials, and spoke with me, saying: Come, I will shew thee the condemnation of the great harlot, who sitteth upon many waters,
0 likes2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication; and they who inhabit the earth, have been made drunk with the wine of her whoredom.
3 And he took me away in spirit into the desert. And I saw a woman sitting upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
4 And the woman was clothed round about with purple and scarlet, and gilt with gold, and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand, full of the abomination and filthiness of her fornication.
5 And on her forehead a name was written: A mystery; Babylon the great, the mother of the fornications, and the abominations of the earth.
6 And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Lord God Jesus. And I wondered, when I had seen her, with great admiration.
7 And the angel said to me: Why dost thou wonder? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast which carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
8 The beast, which thou sawest, was, and is not, and shall come up out of the bottomless pit, and go into destruction: and the inhabitants on the earth (whose names are not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world) shall wonder, seeing the beast that was, and is not.
9 And here is the understanding that hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, upon which the woman sitteth, and they are seven kings:
10 Five are fallen, one is, and the other is not yet come: and when he is come, he must remain a short time.
11 And the beast which was, and is not: the same also is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into destruction.
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest, are ten kings, who have not yet received a kingdom, but shall receive power as kings one hour after the beast.
13 These have one design: and their strength and power they shall deliver to the beast.
14 These shall fight with the Lord God Lamb, and the Lord God Lamb shall overcome them, because he is Lord of lords, and King of kings, and they that are with him are called, and elect, and faithful.
15 And he said to me: The waters which thou sawest, where the harlot sitteth, are peoples, and nations, and tongues.
16 And the ten horns which thou sawest in the beast: these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her with fire.
17 For Lord God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of Lord God be fulfilled.
18 And the woman which thou sawest, is the great city, which hath kingdom over the kings of the earth.
conclusde wrong place for HC spot closer to the door is more like it. bad argument when it looks so far away. too much anger there for everyone
0 likesIt really irritates me when someone parks in a handicapped spot without the plates or placard. But the worst I would do is shake my head at them. I believe karma will do the rest, I'm not spending possibly the rest of my life in prison over a dang parking spot.
2 likesVery bad shoot! No reason to fire at all but lawyers tell us to SHUT UP and that guy should have listened. Talk about destroying a defense .......
0 likesThe fact that he says he wouldn’t change anything says a lot about him
518 likesReplies (7)
Fr, that ended the reasonable doubt you could give him, unless he totally misunderstood the question
11 likesikr, he could have at least said "I'd hope my shot didn't kill him" or something, since he was still doing the self defense thing at that point
30 likesplayed that perfectly. putting minorities down is good
2 likesI just don't think redoing the scenario was at the forefront of his mind, even if he did say he would've done things differently we probably wouldn't have believed him lol
0 likesHe will get what he deserves in jail.
0 likesThat was only to not fuck up his legal defense i imagine
1 likeHe needed to stand by what he said because it would kill his defense
1 likeObserve and report vibes
1 likeIt's classic 2nd degree murder it was his emotions that caused this the guy was unarmed.It went from him able to file charges of assult against him to being a murder and he stated in interview he don't know his face just that he was black and when he shot he didn't see his hands or face just his hip twitch he got manslaughter that's the Justus system.
0 likesReplies (8)
He got manslaughter and 20 years.
0 likes@Yotsuba Space and Music that's something cause he will be 80 when he gets out.2 lives lost except one is still breathing if he would have checked his emotions before shooting he would still be free.
0 likes@F m 55. He was in his 30s when the incident happened.
0 likes@Yotsuba Space and Music he stated in interview he was 48 years old where 30 something came from idk
0 likes@F m the interrogation.
0 likes@Yotsuba Space and Music yea listen to him say 48 when they ask his age during interview.Manslaughter has a max sentence of 15 years and 15 probation.So if they hit him with 20 and manslaughter how many more years is that could be another 15 years on top of 20.
0 likes@Yotsuba Space and Music the difference between an interview and an interrogation is an interview your not under arrest and is willfully talking to police an interrogation is gathering information on a person who is detained/arrested.
0 likes@F m I checked the follow up news on this guy. He lost appeal. He's sentenced to 20 years in prison for manslaughter.
0 likesSo it's self defense. ??? That's disgusting
0 likesHe barely fell over... this micheal is a out of control KAREN...
0 likesNever watched an interrogation where the suspect, with a pretend broken arm, gets on the ground and re-enacts everything. What a fool.
122 likesReplies (4)
I was just thinking that too..😂 when he got on the ground .😂
3 likesActually I have seen reenactments during interrogations, even on this channel.
0 likes089eva Really? Pretend broken arm, while rolling around on the floor? I feel like this is a unique one.
0 likes@meow meow Oh okay, no, that's a first for sure.
0 likesDid he get the max, does anyone know?
0 likesReplies (1)
20 years
0 likesThis shit is fucked, not only did this man kill someone who didn't have the intention of harm but to protect his wife and children, but he was then shot, most likely of the victims ethnic group. The victim did not try to harm the murder after he was shoved, but instead as cameras shown started talking to him, to figure what the case of dramatization.
1 likeThis would be like me pulling a Deagle chambered in 50 AE on a six year old with a sockem-bopper
0 likesI'm sure he's getting graped every day.
0 likesi understand that the husband pushed his murderer because he heard his wife screaming at him and thought he was about to attack him, I understand that you would get confrontational after getting pushed by arguing or maybe even pushing back, but to bring out your gun as soon as you're down from a shove, watch him back up and try to get away as you proceed to shoot him and claim he was coming towards you and then try and act like a hero while using military 'lingo without being in the military is kinda pathetic, this guy really thought he was the law, but guess what? he wasn't..he was just trigger happy and foolish.
806 likesReplies (69)
@Ding Dong breaking the law doesn't inherently justify being killed
94 likes@Ding Dong The man was defending his WIFE, if I saw a random person yelling at my partner, while my kids were in the car I would react the same way. Does parking illegally mean you deserve to get shot wtf? Also what does that have to do with Floyd? This is a completely different situation, and his death was unjust as well. If your racist just say that smh
113 likes@Ding Dong some real smooth brain thinking. How does it feel to mix so many unrelated things together and feel like it's smart enough to share with the public.
22 likes@Marven Corrielus ikr he litteraly could've minded his damn business but he wanted to play police officer so bad
11 likes@Ding Dong why carry a gun to the shop
7 likes@Baddy Pleash 'Murica
6 likesHe is a real mall ninja
0 likesLove how he starts backing up AND THEN the guy shoots. I don't really get pulling out the gun, but at the very least, shooting it? Very sad the children were there as well.
8 likes@Ding Dong he heard his wife yelling and assumed some shit was going down, of course he'd shove the guy, he randomly came up to her to argue (even if she wasn't in the right), and the floyd case has nothing to do with this.
8 likes@Foshy Urgason very sad that he said he never got into a fight, claimed he was prepared to fight, and when there was almost a fight he shot the guy down and never regretted it.
2 likes@Milo Spivak No, but physically attacking someone you don't know might get you killed as it happened here. He might have been a pro boxer and punch him to dead instead of a gun. It was a purely verbal altercation until he attacked.
3 likes@Gucci Couture So are you saying that you would violently push someone to the street like that if he was arguing with your wife? I sure as hell wouldn't. I would go and ask what his problem is. You realize that if the shooter would have slammed his head on the asfalt when pushed, he might be dead now? The physical attack was completely uncalled for and dumb.
1 like@What DoIPut Unrelated to you and clear to many others. How does that feel?
0 likes@Baddy Pleash Because he might get physically attacked at the parking lot perhaps? He was carrying that gun for decades and nothing happened as long as nobody started pushing him to the ground. Yes, it was totally wrong that he shot but then again it wouldn't have happened without the push. Both were at fault.
0 likes@Jon Carl The Floyd case has a striking similarity in the sense that both would now be alive if they acted civil. Start violence, bad things tend to happen.
0 likes@Ding Dong you know that feeling when you lean too far back in your chair and almost fall back, but catch yourself at the last minute? I feel like that all the time.
4 likes@Ding Dong Like I said he saw a stranger yelling at his wife, who could've been armed (in which he was) even witnesses stated that they heard violent yelling, the man came to out the store, saw what was happening and reacted. I would say he even saw him as a threat, a threat to his family, and sadly he was because now they lost a father and a husband
5 likes@Ding Dong ok but going up to someone's car and yelling might get you killed so what's your point exactly. The mf had a gun what would you say if he shot the wife or even the kids? did you even watch the video at all? everything you're saying has already been addressed in it.
7 likes@Ding Dong you’re name fits you very well. You ain’t that bright I see.
8 likes@Ding Dong And last thing, since you're so hooked on the pushing thing, maybe people shouldn't start yelling at others because they might get "pushed to hard"🙄
4 likes@Jon Carl ^
0 likes@Ding Dong Ok, first of all, the guy heard the old bastard arguing with his wife and thought she was in immediate danger, his kids were in the car and the old guy was escalating things. The old guy said "I never got into a fight, even in school!" but said "I was prepared to fight if it had to come to it!", well, when that man who was defending his family shoved the bastard, what did he do? did he start getting physical? No, he immediately unholstered his gun while the father/husband started backing up and got shot, then the bastard claimed that his victim was running towards him, your name is pretty accurate so far, which is the only fact you have that is currently accurate.
3 likes@Gucci Couture I would not start pushing or striking him, I would calmly ask what his problem is. Only if he poses a physical threat, I would even touch him. Complaining about a parking spot is not a physical threat.
0 likes@Gucci Couture He had no justification to push the man. He started the violence and made this poorly judged man decide that he had to defend his face by shooting him. It would neve have happened unless he pushed him.
0 likes@Gucci Couture Well obviously yelling didn't get anyone killed but physically attacking did.
0 likes@Jon Carl What was his justification for shoving the man? Nothing. The man was yelling and being aggravated by the loud mouthed wife in the car apparently (judging from how the discussion heated very quickly). He could have gone there and talked to the man politely and the situation would have dissolved. But no, he chose to act like a macho hothead and attacked the guy. And paid the ultimate price for his bad choice.
0 likes@Ding Dong So you're saying it's justified to shoot down an unarmed man who was already about to back off as soon as he saw the gun come out? the guys kids were there and his wife was yelling at the guy not as if it was a petty squable but as if it was a big deal, while yes it was illegal that she parked there and yes it was wrong of him to shove the guy. it's understandable as to why he'd do it, his motives were his wife and kid and he thought the guy was crazy, you're just saying it's the fault of the man and woman (it's their fault for parking there, and while yes he could have reacted differently it doesn't mean he should get shot down while unarmed and EVEN TURNING BACK AS TO GET AWAY FROM THE GUN TOTING IDIOT), the man could have handled that better, he's at fault for shooting down a father and husband who was assuming the guy was crazy, if the father shot down the guy i'd say the father was at fault for shooting the guy down, if the wife shot him down i'd say she's at fault for shooting him down in an argument, but it was a petty argument that turned physical due to a misunderstanding, then turned into a murder charge because the guy was trigger happy and KNEW the father was running away from him.
2 likesLived as a thug, died as a thug.
2 likes@Ding Dong this was never a game of comparison. You commented what you did though, and it was just a sad that that’s how you took this story. You could be an intelligent man/woman that lacks empathy, compassion, and the concern for lives. I can give a fuck less if you’re smarter than I am, ding dong. Have a wonderful day & be safe out there. 👍🏼
3 likes@promontorium Tf?
1 like@Jon Carl If you read my replies I have repeatedly said I don't justify the shooting in any way. I'm just saying that the victim caused the situation to escalate to the point it did by physically attacking the shooter, for no reason expect than showing off what a big man he was. If he would have acted in a civilized manner, only thing that would have been shot would be a couple of f-bombs and they drive away.
0 likesExactly, that long pause before he shot have it away. He was having a bad day. I get pissed with people parking in handicap spaces as well but if I confront some one about I know what I'm getting myself into. I can throw hands so I'm not relying on a weapon in case it goes south. That was his intentions from the start. If the lady would have gotten out he would of did the same. Too my black brethren out there we got to start playing smart because we play by Men rules and some people play by being cowards. I have a best friend who will always run in a fight but would never pull a weapon. That being said if the dude never laid hands on him he would be alive. Stay calm and walk away people ain't worth the trouble.
1 likeI agree. He took out that gun so fast... Way too fast. And the guy was just defending his family
3 likes@Ding Dong By your logic, the subject of this video should’ve been minding his own business and not gotten confrontational over someone else’s parking – and therefore got entirely what was coming.
3 likes@Cobra McJingleballs A citizen is well within his rights to comment when someone is violating either the law or moral standards. He did not physically assault anyone until being assaulted upon.
0 likes@Ding Dong can tell who wrote this is a white male. Why bring Floyd into this? This video has nothing to do with Floyd. Sounds like “if you follow the law nothing will happen to you”
2 likes@ Gucci Couture
1 likePushing someone because there is yelling is also illegal. If he has fallen so that his head had hit the ground and it could have resulted in serious injury (or death in a extreme case) so it would also have caused a court case. It’s far less likely that pushing causes death than gun causing death. But it’s still not legally justified for you to push people over them yelling, it’s just usually don’t cause any serious injuries so it won’t cause followup. But it’s not what you should do in either legal standpoint or practical like here where the guy had a gun and thought it was fine to kill the person who pushed him.
Ding Dong Exactly right. People saying here that he didn’t deserve death. Obviously! The thing is every action has consequences. The victim chose to get aggressive and physically violent. He committed assault and got one-upped. The victim is not entirely blameless for the events that transpired. He would be alive today if he chose words.
0 likes@Ding Dong your name is fitting
0 likes@Ding Dong I can just imagine the putting on clown makeup meme with your comment all over it
2 likes@Ding Dong “physical” doesn’t matter . A threat is a threat .
0 likes@Ding Dong the dude pushing him didn’t die from the push . The dude who was oddly carrying a gun around is what killed him . Using ur logic ur contradicting urself LOL
0 likesLiar
0 likes@Cesar Bernal This would have been true in both cases, yes. Don't act violent and chances are you won't get hurt either.
1 like@YoMamas TheMailMan Trying to insult me results only in your personal shame.
0 likes@Sleep Which part of it exactly? Or did you just not understand what you read?
0 likes@Deja Xyz Uhh Floyd violently resisted arrest which was the only reason he got put to the ground. He was already in the patrol car going by his merry way until he went crazy. Had he sat there he would now be alive and we'd avoid all the BS. Doing drugs and attacking the police is not just "a mistake". It has consequences.
1 like@Deja Xyz "physical" matters. Words are words, when you push someone to the ground violently, it can potentially result to a serious injury or death. There are countless cases where people died from hitting their head to sharp objects (or hit by a passing car) after being pushed like that. Moreover that attack triggered the gun man to pull, which would most likely not have happened if only words were exchanged.
1 like@YoMamas TheMailMan Learn to read please. I never claimed to do anything. I said that if you physically attack an unknown person, that person may respond with deadly force as happened in this case. You never know who you push, it might be a veeeery bad idea. Like the guy who got caught stealing Chuck Liddels truck lol.
0 likes@Ding Dong the victim didn’t cause anything he protected his wife from a man who was violently yelling at her when his kids were in the car
0 likes@Olufunso Fawole violently yelling? Lol u messed up in the head.
2 likesYe all that terrible violence he inflicted reprimanding her for parking in a handicaped spot.
Nobody is defending what the shooter did. But what the father did was still assault. Not defending his family.
@Xander Houston For the n:th time I'm not defending him I'm accusing the hothead for the initial physical attack that got him killed. Act civil, live. Simple.
0 likes@Olufunso Fawole He caused a physical confrontation with a man who had that far only yelled some words. He had no need to push him, he could have gone between the argument and told him to piss off and leave. But no, he chose violence and lost.
0 likes@Olufunso Fawole I'm pretty sure the wife was extremely rude to the man, which is why the verbal argument escalated in a few seconds. Had she said "oh sorry, we didn't realize" the whole argument would be over and the husband had no excuse to start pushing armed gunmen to the ground. They learned the thug life lesson the hard way.
0 likes@Cauchy Schwarz I can’t even remember your initial comment and I don’t have the energy to scroll
0 likes@Olufunso Fawole Reading comprehension please. I said "judging from the speed of which the verbal argument heated up". If the wife would have given a civil answer, there would be no need for a heated argument. But I guess this concept is too hard to grasp for some. It's easier to close your eyes from facts and throw insults and accusations.
0 likes@Cauchy Schwarz I'm not saying he should have pushed him, I'm saying i understand his reasoning for it, a random guy yelling at his wife in front of his kids and he's unsure as to who the guy is, he shouldn't have pushed him but then again the guy who shot him shouldn't have shot him down, he claimed that he had known that it could have gotten physical and said "I was prepared for it to get physical" but then claimed "I've never gotten into a fight, even in school!" as a reason to why he was a good man.
0 likes@Jon Carl I understand both peoples reasoning and both were wrong in what they did. Of course the shooter was off a lot more.
0 likesI just read things from others things like "defending his family" and that is just absurd. A young man pushing an older person to the floor just because of a heated verbal argument is simply assault.
@Ding Dong
0 likesNothing says land of the free quite like field administrations of capital punishment for any suspected breaking of the law
@MisterMan Heh, while it may have used to be like that as we saw the system doesn't exactly support it anymore or the society morally condone it :)
0 likes@Kristian no matter what I said they still weren't getting it🙄
1 like@Ding Dong if he had slammed his head. But that is not what happened. Maybe the husband over reacted with the shove, maybe not. I don't believe there was any audio in that clip. We have no idea of what was being said and at what volume. Too bad the guy didn't just mind his own damned business.
0 likes@Ding Dong Also would not have happened if the guy had minded his own business about the parking. He could have notified the store manager about the parking "problem". Pretty sure no one would have gotten killed.
0 likes@Ding Dong no man, you are wrong about that.
0 likes@Sheryl Ferraro No, this whole thing started with them parking to a handicap spot. They and they only were the cause for the whole altercation. And in addition to parking bad, the husband got violent and dangerously pushed a man who was only commenting on them violating the rights of disabled people.
0 likes@Kristian LOL now that was a seriously mental thing to say. If you can't see how pushing a man to the ground could get you in trouble, how can you call me stupid?
0 likesI dont fully blame him for pulling the gun because the situation of being knocked to the floor from behind and having no clue what could be happening, but firing the gun was the dumbest shit.
0 likesThis is exactly why people shouldn't attack strangers. You never know if it's a low self esteem maniac who just waits for an excuse to shoot or a cop with a bad day and a heavy knee.
0 likes@promontorium The "thug" is in prison.
0 likes1 Timothy 2 I desire therefore, first of all, that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all men:
0 likes2 For kings, and for all that are in high station: that we may lead a quiet and a peaceable life in all piety and holy chastity.
3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of Lord God our Saviour,
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth.
5 For there is one Lord God, and one mediator of Lord God and men, the man Lord God Christ Jesus:
6 Who gave himself a redemption for all, a testimony in due times.
7 Whereunto I am appointed a preacher and an apostle, (I say the truth, I lie not,) a doctor of the Gentiles in faith and truth.
8 I will therefore that men pray in every place, lifting up pure hands, without anger and contention.
9 In like manner women also in decent apparel: adorning themselves with modesty and sobriety, not with plaited hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly attire,
10 But as it becometh women professing godliness, with good works.
11 Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection.
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence.
13 For Adam was first formed; then Eve.
14 And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression.
15 Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in true faith, and holy love, and sanctification, with sobriety.
Daren gone lethal
1 like1 Timothy 5 An ancient man rebuke not, but entreat him as a father: young men, as brethren:
0 likes2 Old women, as mothers: young women, as sisters, in all holy chastity.
3 Honour widows, that are widows indeed.
4 But if any widow have children, or grandchildren, let her learn first to govern her own house, and to make a return of duty to her parents: for this is acceptable before Lord God.
5 But she that is a widow indeed, and desolate, let her trust in Lord God, and continue in supplications and prayers night and day.
6 For she that liveth in pleasures, is dead while she is living.
7 And this give in charge, that they may be blameless.
8 But if any man have not care of his own, and especially of those of his house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
9 Let a widow be chosen of no less than threescore years of age, who hath been the wife of one husband.
10 Having testimony for her good works, if she have brought up children, if she have received to harbour, if she have washed the saints' feet, if she have ministered to them that suffer tribulation, if she have diligently followed every good work.
11 But the younger widows avoid. For when they have grown rebellious in Lord God Christ, they will marry:
12 Having damnation, because they have made void their first faith.
13 And withal being idle they learn to go about from house to house: and are not only idle, but tattlers also, and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not.
14 I will therefore that the younger should marry, bear children, be mistresses of families, give no occasion to the adversary to speak evil.
15 For some are already turned aside after Satan.
16 If any of the faithful have widows, let him minister to them, and let not the church be charged: that there may be sufficient for them that are widows indeed.
17 Let the priests that rule well, be esteemed worthy of double honour: especially they who labour in the word and doctrine:
18 For the scripture saith: Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn: and, The labourer is worthy of his reward.
19 Against a priest receive not an accusation, but under two or three witnesses.
20 Them that sin reprove before all: that the rest also may have fear.
21 I charge thee before Lord God, and Lord God Christ Jesus, and the elect angels, that thou observe these things without prejudice, doing nothing by declining to either side.
22 Impose not hands lightly upon any man, neither be partaker of other men's sins. Keep thyself chaste.
23 Do not still drink water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake, and thy frequent infirmities.
24 Some men's sins are manifest, going before to judgment: and some men they follow after.
25 In like manner also good deeds are manifest: and they that are otherwise, cannot be hid.
I literally cannot fathom giving any sort of a fuck about someone parking in a handicap spot even if i WAS handicapped. You're not a cop or a security gaurd. Hell even if a cop saw that they weren't handicapped he would've just given them a ticket like its not that deep bruh
1 likeReplies (2)
@Bryan Holden no i wouldn't bro. It's a gas station not a fucking walmart parking lot
0 likes@Bryan Holden it doesn't matter bro its a gas station all the parking spots are right in front of the store
0 likesThere’s something to be said about the fine art of minding ones own business.
2656 likesReplies (121)
That's what I said. I know it bothers me to see someone taking up a handicap parking if they don't need it, or don't have a permit but I wouldn't go up to them and tell them to move. Thats just super stupid especially in this country where almost everyone has a gun and most people are crazy.
127 likeswhat if the white guy was legitimately handicapped and upset about people constantly violating the protocols? It is OK for the black guy to assault him and shove him to the ground?
55 likes@Jon BonBon The thing is that he shot himself in the leg when he said he wasn't worried about the reaction he could cause by doing this cause he carried a gun. In other words, he was just waiting for this opportunity to use it.
95 likes@Jon BonBon Even if he was handicapped, him being shoved did not mean he could fire his weapon straight into that man
80 likes@Jon BonBon Guy thought the dude was gonna hurt his girlfriend, lmao. So he shoves him away. Doesn't justify lethal force. You can't use lethal force to get revenge, which is what this guy did. He could have just got up walked away, filed a police report for assault. But the guy backs up and starts turning when the gun is pulled out, threat is moving away, you lose your justification for lethal force.
127 likesI'm a hardcore gun rights supporter, and this was a bad kill. No matter how you spin it, who gives a fuck what he was upset about. you contact the relevant agency, report it, walk away and go home. You CANNOT use your firearm for revenge, cause you're mad.
It's a lost art in a society filled with narcissists.
20 likes@Blackhand Spectre You watched the same video as everyone else right? Dude got found guilty lol.
39 likes@Blackhand Spectre You said there’s something to be said about the fine are of following the rules (laws). The courts found that Drejka did not follow the law (rules) in regards to when you can discharge a firearm. Maybe he should have minded his own business and not broke the rules too?
39 likes@Blackhand Spectre Lol he only claimed he thought he was gonna get stomped cause it looked better than what really happened. A coward who shot a man trying to walk away from him.
27 likes@Peef Rimgaar And he shouldn't have. The assault was initiated by the the thug. Not this guy. He was defending himself after being assaulted.
5 likesVery well said. thank you
1 like@Jon BonBon if? The facts is , he is not.
0 likes@Money Mix Machine yes, but how exactly was the African-American criminal supposed to KNOW that he wasn't handicapped from the brief visual assessment he arguably performed in the short amount of time between exiting the store and attacking him? (As if that makes a difference to him, my guess is he would have assaulted the man just for being white and having the audacity to speak up against his criminal conduct EVEN IF he was handicapped)
2 likesHe simply couldn't have known that unless he had all the information that we have now. From his perspective, he's just assaulted someone who was potentially handicapped.
Hindsight is irrelevant.
Nothing but a sad future ahead in your life, going around with the mentality you have, bud!
@Blackhand Spectre and it's this thought process that because you carry a gun you have a right to police others who do not follow the rules why people like Michael and maybe you end up in situations like this.
7 likes@Blackhand Spectre probably shoved him because he was an old white man
0 likes@Jon BonBon “what if”. Right there your argument collapses. Had he not killed the guy he could have had him arrested for assault. You’re a dope.
2 likesI practice this art quite intently.
2 likes@Blackhand Spectre yeah but you also don't undermine a father in front if his family
0 likes@Blackhand Spectre parking in a handy cap spot might have harmed someone but it didn't in this case
1 like@Blackhand Spectre funny how the predator will end up being the prey in prison when Jamal and his friends make him their bitch over being pushed lol
1 like@Shelly Shelly I agree, I think they should do away with handicaped spaces everywhere except hospitals and doctors offices where they are most likely to be used for the intended purpose, now a days so many non disabled people have a plackard/plates just to take advantage, my mom is 88 and has never gotten one, I have real issues that would warrent me to have one but I also refuse since I can walk on my own without a wheelchair,walker or cane, I also adhere to "If you don't use it you lose it." when it comes to mobility.
0 likes@Peef Rimgaar It still doesn't exonerate the man who shoved him or his baby momma parking in a handicapped spot when 4 were open, ultimately the guy shot got the dealth penalty for his actions regardless.
2 likesThe very fact that he knew he had a gun on his person gave him the balls to do what he first did in the first place. Which is why he circled the car looking for a handicap tag/sticker and started the argument. If he didn't have the gun w/him he wouldn't have even started anything. Basically a coward. Big man WITH a gun.
4 likes@E Rivers They need to do away with handicapped spaces period, I know from experience if you are truly handicapped you have someone else taking care of you and you can never park in those spaces because someone who is not handicapped is in them, you are also right about (no pun intended) walking away from them, the self entitled narcissist doesn't and never will care, so you are talking to a brick wall.
0 likes@Blackhand Spectre 1. Who cares that he parked illegally? Was he the handicap parking police? As Timothy Collins so eloquently put it, "There's something to be said about the fine art of minding ones own business."
1 like2. If he had minded his own business, no assault would have taken place. Your can't control what the other person's reactions are going to be, but you can control yours. And I'm not defending either guy. The guy that got shot could have come out, defused the situation somehow. But no, unfortunately for him he chose violence first and look what happened to him.
And to think, this whole thing could have been avoided if that LAZY idiot driver would have just parked legally in the first place. Ok, time for me to let this one go. LOL!
@Blackhand Spectre You do not fire your weapon after being pushed. Drejka already had the gun unholstered, victim did not approach further and was still gunned down.
0 likesThis dude was a ticking time bomb. He was always going to kill someone.
5 likes@Jon BonBon You yell at my wife over nothing, and a shove is the LEAST you're going to get.
3 likes@Peef Rimgaar ya and they would’ve filed assault charges against the original assailant were he still alive, I bet his former women doesn’t park in handicapped places anymore , lolololol
1 like@A-a Ron 4tw The Irony here is he parked illegally to do so 😆
3 likesAmen.
0 likesI haven't watched this yet but erryone needs to learn to mind their own
@Jon BonBon the door seems to actually be further from the handicapped spot- there was open spots directly in front of the door.
2 likesAnd you don’t walk up to someone and immediately shove them or assault them.
3 likes@Jon BonBon god damn dude, if racism was a smell you would be putrid.
6 likesYeah but honestly the black guy doesn’t need to shove him like that wtf, should’ve just told him to back off.
1 likeLike honestly the white guy was being civil and just talking things out but then out of nowhere he gets shoved to the ground and gets hurt.
He definitely didn’t need to shoot him, probably a bit trigger happy, it’s self defense as the end of the day tho.
I don’t think the white guy will be convicted considering that.
@Daniel Cruz exactly bruh you can’t just assault someone and think they aren’t gonna do something black guy was at fault didn’t put his arms up in the air or nothing. You can see the black guy pick up his shorts cuz they were sagging and that in itself showed bad intentions. Both are at fault but to say the other guy was the aggressor is baffling
2 likesAren’t you glad you’re not that guy? I’m referring to Drejka.
0 likes@Daniel Cruz he was not being civil. He was harassing the wife. He got shoved because of that. Because he was too chickenshit to shove him back he decided to kill the man.
2 likesExecution is not the appropriate response to getting shoved. Doesn't work on the playground, doesn't work in adult life either. Why does this need to be explained to you?
And the guy was sentenced to 20 years. Which is too short in my opinion.
I learned that in prison.
0 likes@Jon BonBon the guy is in the wrong he should of minded his business but no that gun made him feel tuff yelling at a girl then her boyfriend step in him he got push for running his mouth plus he always had other cases for stuff just like so he shoots a man that was backing up .could of held him at gunpoint for johny law to show up but no he shoots him as he was backing up .he was just looking for a reason to use his gun because instead of being a man taking a 1v1 when he had no business trying to enforce a law when it's not his job
3 likes@Wes Mantooth wouldn't ever been assaulted if he didn't get in a man's wife's face yell at her with her kids in the car thinking it was just a woman the guy has other cases of pulling guns on women and men white and black he's a dangerous individual he put his self into a situation instigated it and then shot somebody because he was scared because he was doing something he wasn't supposed to do and then shoots a man while he's backing up
4 likes@Blackhand Spectre a coward yells at a woman while she has her kids with her a man defends his wife and his kids
4 likes@Wes Mantooth Worst take of the century
2 likes@Jon BonBon then he should call an authority cuz THAT AINT HIM. Instead he went and shot her husband and youre defending him, over a damn parking space? Gtfoh.
4 likes@Jon BonBon two wrongs dont make a right, man. It was obviously not okay for him to shove the guy. But a shove is NOTHING compared to shooting a guy in front of his kids. The fact that you are arguing they are in any way shape or form comparable is sick. Why would you even push that narrative? I honestly dont get it.
4 likes@TimTim Smith and you think that's not worse? Wtf?
1 like@TimTim Smith why are you asking me to clarify your own thoughts? You good bro?
1 like@TimTim Smith you asked me to clarify what you think. Literally word by word thats what you asked.
2 likesBut sure, you implied not respecting parking spaces somehow justifies getting shot
@TimTim Smith immediately after asking "I think what?" You also asked me to clarify your thoughts. I dont wanna get hung over semantics, but you didnt ask me to clarify my question, you asked me to clarify your answer which you hadnt yet given to me.
1 likeAnd Im sorry bro, confronting someone over a parking spot and getting shot have absolutely no causal relationship. You tell them to move out of the parking space and if they dont you move on with your day.
Drejka was asked if he was aware that walking up to a car and confronting the passanger over a parking spot could have started a confrontation, to which he replied "yes" then he was asked if he would do the same if he didnt have his gun to which he initially replied that he wouldnt because he was aware that there might have been a confrontation, showing he was fully prepared for the use of lethal force the moment he walked up to that car. Which is needless to say, completely insane.
And why on Earth would you assume Im trying to turn this into a race thing? Are you?
@TimTim Smith you have no idea of any of that, it all conjecture.
1 likeDrejka is the one who instigated the confrontation, and by his own adimssion he wouldnt have confronted the woman if he didnt have his gun(showing he was willing to use deadly force roght from the get go)
Again, we have no idea if djerka would have shot the man regardless of getting body checked, he has a history of pulling out his gun over minor incidents. And he shot him when he was already backing away and even turning around.
His perception of apropiate use if force was already skewed to begin with.
He also didnt make any attempts to defuse or remove himself from the situation once his gun was out.
You cant just ask yes or no as if thats the only valid answer. They are not valid answers. The only valid answer is: we dont know.
@TimTim Smith why do you keep asking if Im trolling, and I am using my common sense,use yours. If derjka hadnt pulled the trigger no one would have died, thats the only action that directly lead to a death. All other actions could have potentially had so many other results we just cant assume the outcome because of "common sense". If that was the deciding factor then its also common sense not to get into a heated argument with a stranger iver a praking lot, its common sense not to rush a stranger before defusing, its common sense not to shoot a man before trying to remove yourself from the situation, its common sense not to shoot a man who is backing away and turning his back on you. If it common sense was common we wouldnt have these type of cases. You have no idea how poeple would react, all we can go by is what did happen.
0 likes@TimTim Smith bro, if common sense had prevailed a man wouldnt have been shot and killed in front of his 5 year old...OVER A PARKING SPOT.
0 likesC'mon man, don't be that guy. This is what I was talking about right from the beginning. Parking in a disabled spot is not even remotely close to a reason for getting shot. Not even close.
@TimTim Smith and it also wouldnt have happened if the shooter just moved on with his life instead of making a scene. See how that works? Its a non point. Its irrelevant.
0 likes@TimTim Smith how many people get shot over parking on disabled spots? You are acting as if getting shot over that is a given. Its not. No one in their right mind would think that. Why you keep acting as if it somehow adds up?
0 likes@TimTim Smith oh, so now you are interested in the particular context instead of what ifs yes or no questions? Its a start.
0 likesMaybe they actually moved their cars, maybe he didn't confront them and was lying, maybe one of those instances was one of the other times he pulled out his gun for no reason and they booked it before he got a shot. Because he has done that in the past you know? It wasnt the first time he pulled a gun over car related incidents. Maybe this time he actually went through with it. By his own admision he does not confront people with out his gun. Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not.
Or living in a country where people don't walk around with so many guns, maybe? A fistfight is not optimal, but way less lethal.
0 likes@Jon BonBon No, and he could have potentially been charged with that if he had been alive instead of a victim of vigilante justice.
0 likesOf course there is. But surely allowances should be made for speaking to a fellow citizen about their possibly violating a rule meant to help the disabled?
0 likesHe shouldnt have shot his gun, but He was assaulted and maybe He felt threatened so He could draw his Gun. That would end it. He didnt need to shoot.
0 likes@BigBlack Drejka its obviously an insecure, unnestable, not smart person. He could have defend himself with the gun and not finish in jail if he hasnt unnecessarily killed a man. CAN'T YOU SEE THAT??
1 like@Wes Mantooth wouldn't have to defend himself if he didn't get that liquid courage tries to enforce the lot like he owns it . I bet he was having a bad day wife cheating on him daughter dates black guys so he found a place where he can seem big and bad with a gun on his hip trying to check people over parking in handicap spaces smh
1 likeThere’s something to be said about physically assaulting somebody first.
0 likes@M C no he approach an was the reason for the drama an even said he does it all the time the guy had other case of pulling guns on people an approaching people like he was a cop .he would never got pushed if he would of minded his business frfr an didn't yell at ladys an after he get pushed an he falls he so scared now wasn't scared when he was the windows yelling at a woman but when a man gets involved he scared .y do u think he is in prison because he was wrong theres nothing really to say about it he shot a man that was backing walking away didn't hold him at gunpoint for assault he shot him because he was scared but he put his self in the situation in the first place who the f*** hangs out at a store and wait for people to pull in a handicap spot so they can get out their car and talk s*** to them because he thinks he a cop just because he a drunk with a gun killing people that's unarm after he instigated the assault put his self in that situation but still at the people believing that he was in the right that's why he's in prison right now in anybody thinking that he was in the right let them do some stuff and they be in prison right along with him
2 likes@M C plus he parked illegally trying to tell somebody that they was parked illegally
2 likes@Holy Cannoli why was he shoved couldnt just talk had to straight to violence
0 likes@RiotEpidemic You can be verbally aggressive you know that right? Raising your voice is an overtly aggressive act, you can be an aggressor without raising a hand to a person.
0 likes@Lara Nelemans and that logic goes vise versa wife was yelling back trying to justify herself for who knows what. Whatever I could care less about this case it’s just common sense whose in the right here. Hope this guy got off free no charges and given a medal for a waste of his time interrogating him
0 likes@RiotEpidemic You could care less or you couldn't care less? The first one means you care about it very much and the second one means you don't care a out it at all. Here's an example for you: I couldn't care less about your opinion.
0 likesYes!
0 likesThere some peoples can't stop how gangster they think they are.
0 likes@Lara Nelemans comment got deleted you must of reported it
0 likes@Jon BonBon no, it would not be ok. But that does not deserve death. As you've heard (if you finished the doc) it's not his first time threatening people, including mother's with children in their vehicle, with a gun.
0 likesA rational thinking person may pull out the fun but didn't fire on someone stepping back. Showing the fun alone is stating "step back." You don't shoot someone stepping back. Or even a dog stepping back.
I'm not saying it's racism at all, I actually don't think it is. And I say that as a black man. It's simply poor judgement. Terribly poor judgement, and/or lack of value for human life
@Blackhand Spectre wrongs were done on both sides here guys, face it. The guy coming out of the store should have used words first, yes.
1 likeThe guy who got pushed should not have used a weapon on an unarmed backstepping person. You can pull the gun, that sends a message. But if they step back you don't fire. It's a gun, a deadly weapon, not a rubber mallet. How isn't this common sense. Gun=deadly weapon, it's not a fist. Drawing it says enough
@Blackhand Spectre ok thanks for clarifying brother. I'm just confused as to what is being argued here 👀 I thought that was it, as the rest just doesn't make sense
0 likesSame can be said about attacking someone for NO REASON.
0 likes@Exarch Gaming it DOES justify lethal force if you believe your life is in danger.
0 likes@Jon BonBon no no I get your logic let’s VAR check. Women (maybe unintentionally) parks in handicapped spot. A clear non handicapped guy gets out to look. STARTS the argument. boyfriend comes out who’s clear role will be to protect his wife shoves the guy away. The guy then proceeds to pull out a gun. when he BACKS UP. There is at least a 3 second gap between him walking back after the gun is revealed and him firing. There is no defense he could have got up kept the gun pointing and either called the cops or drove away. Sorry Nazi not all of us like shooting blacks with our guns you might tho...
0 likesHow long have you been this way?
0 likesOk, I must be missing something. I know that area of Clearwater and quite literally anything can happen being the extremely unpredictable Floridians that we are. You don't hard check a man into the the street from behind for arguing with your girlfriend - my ass would be dead fifty time's over (rightfully so) if I didn't ya know use my words before resorting blind violence. Black, White, Green, Yellow or indifferent you're going to catch shrapnel if you assault someone in the Crazy Capitol of these United States. Sadly, it is the society we live in until we fully evolve.
1 like@Jon BonBon If I was so worried about someone in a handicapped spot if or if not I was handicapped I would have called the police to report. Was it ok for the victim to come out the store and push the man to the ground? No.
1 likeWhat makes me call bullshit is that Michael Drejka had his gun on him when he went to complain to the female in the car. It makes me feel like Drejka was looking for trouble. He found a black woman in a handicapped spot and got involved when he didn't need to. It smells like old fashioned American racism to me.
There is something to be said about self-defence. If 2 animals came towards me and one of them attaxks me without questioning the situation, i would loose it too. I would, sorry! He didn't mind his own Business, but the dead one didn't too!
0 likesThere's also something called standing up for what's right, i.e being a good citizen. Illegal handicap parking is actually a major issue in the US, and have caused serious issues to people with actual disabilities, but judging on your comment, you don't seem to care much about that, at all, and would let everyone and anyone ILLEGALLY park on a handicapped spot, because, after all, you're only "minding your own buisness", right?
3 likesIn regards to standing up for what's right, Drejka did what every good citizen should do when he confronted the woman in the car about it. Now, if he was hostile in this confrontation, it's obviously the wrong way to go at it.
Now, to the actual violent confrontation; The victim pushing him like he did was stupid and reckless. Seemed like he barely even said a word, before pushing him to the ground. Being so quick to violence against someone you don't have a single clue of what he/she is capable of, simply doesn't seem like a smart move, and unfortunately he paid the ultimate price for it. With THAT said, the fact that Drejka actually SHOT the man for pushing him to the ground is of course more stupid and reckless. If he just pulled the gun, WITHOUT shooting, it would've been fine, but the fact that he actually shot and killed the victim even though he's backing up was so utterly cowardly and pointless.
The whole scenario is just filled with stupid shit that could've easily been avoided. Sad, really.
@June Bug Get a grip. For starters, you don't even know who started the yelling. For all we know, it's the LADY who parked her car ILLEGALLY that started. And, him "defending" his woman by basically walking up and pushing him hard to the ground without barely even saying a word is NOT being a man, it's just being stupid. Being prone to violence doesn't equal being a man, and if you think so, you're in serious need of a reality check. If he would've actually talked to him instead of pushing him, this all would've most probably been avoided.
0 likesAlso, how nice of you to justify assault, and not even caring even ONE bit that she in fact parked her car illegally on the ONE and only handicapped spot. She was NOT a victim here, which you seem to imply when you claimed the guy who got shot "defended his wife". You seem to forget the fact that she BROKE the LAW. As I see it, the kid is the real victim here, losing his father to something that could've been so easily avoidable, if they just thought before acting.
For the record, your sense of "justice" is just so off and biased it's surreal. Luckily, I am 99,99% sure you aren't a legal worker with that "logic", so at least we can rest easy on that knowledge.
Now, did the guy deserve to get shot and killed? Of course NOT. It was a stupid and cowardly thing to do, considering he was backing up when the gun was pulled. But then again, this whole scenario is just filled with stupid and avoidable events.
@Daniel Vergara lmfao who started the man admits he did ..ur like him I bet got a gun to act TUFF like I said people like u and him got picked couldn't fight so u get a gun instead of fighting it like a real MAN
0 likes@June Bug He said he started yelling? Where exactly? But yea, it really isn't that important who started the yelling. It's when it turned physical the real issue began. And no, I don't own a gun. Actually, I don't like violence at all, let alone weapons, and I would certainly think twice and try to descelate a situation like this instead of just rushing in and pushing someone. Why? Because I don't know how the person I push would react, AND more importantly, I don't know if he/she is carrying a weapon. The person I start a fight with can literally be carrying a gun for all I know (like Drejka did), so please, tell me again how it's so "manly" and "tough" (oh yea, it's spelt tough, not tuff) risking your life to start a pointless fight?
0 likesI did, for the record, box for almost a year, so I CAN fight, I just don't like it. Violence only leads to more violence, which this video clearly demonstrates, yet you still seem to think it's a good solution. Sad.
you want me to.... MIND MY OWN....
0 likesBUISNESSSS??
*pulls out a glock, because that's obviously the way to handle disputes as rational adults
@Barrak Smokebama best comment I seen in here frfr
0 likesAnd to the fine art of not going up to people and shoving them to the ground.
0 likes@gfelipe1 u kno he got found guilty right plus he parked illegally his self to try to check some one being pushed to the run for running your mouth doesn't give u a license to kill that's why he is dropping the soap as we speak no guns in prison an we kno he cant fight lmfaoo
0 likes@Jon BonBon if he was legitimately handicapped he could have walked into the store and reported the infraction. It would be the responsibility of the store owner to decide whether or not to take action. He had no right or responsibility to enforce the regulation.
0 likes@Wes Mantooth can’t help but think that your answer would be different if the races wee switched. Black man approaches and begins yelling and gesturing at a car with a white woman and children. The white man runs out to see who is threatening his family. He runs to protect his family, shoving the black man, who stumbles and falls. You never in a thousand years would have described the white father protecting his family as a “thug”.
0 likes@Jon BonBon no, the shoving was not ok. However, killing him over it is even more not ok
0 likes@Jon BonBon never okay! I would have gotten up and walked back to my car after i 📷 the license plate; layer pressing charges for an assault. But this guy clearly was too busy huffing glue as a child so it's as expected for a low-iq human
0 likes@Jon BonBon the guy definetly shouldn't have shoved him to the ground, without even speaking to him he came up to his side and shoved him like that. That was wrong however then the other guy shooting him is like wtf levels of stupid. Both were wrong and what followed is very sad
2 likesYes! I have to tell my stepdad that all the time. He’s a well to do white lawyer, and he has the ridiculous belief that everyone is equal and you can talk to everyone the same way. I keep telling him he is going to get killed. Getting onto people for cutting the line at the store and for not pulling up far enough at the gas station. He’s need to do like me. Head down, eyes on feet. I find it greatly increases life expectancy.
0 likes@Holy Cannoli I disagree with that but he did provoke the situation knowing he was armed and shot the man after provoking him.
0 likes❤️❤️❤️
0 likes@ghostdog2041 we talk; confrontential and all that then something happens but when you see that walk then hard shove; the man had some sort of confidence thinking that he can do it and nothing could happen and it was wrong; he got a bullet. That's that.
0 likes@Peef Rimgaar someone stole the handicapped spot and got confronted. While confronting he was attacked while on the ground he shoot 1 shoot to get the attacker away.
0 likesCourt may find him guilty but the simple fact remains. If he didnt assault him first he would not be dead.
The death was most likely an accident and he acted in self defence. Looking at it afterwards does not justify the situation in the moment.
The black man was a protecting husband who instead of questioning the situation took action (which is not wrong or right)
The action took the white guy by surprice and once on the ground he was in a defenseless position where he tried to take control. After he fired and noticed what just happend everyone just stopped what they were doing.
Even if its clear the guy was backing off before he shoots when playing it in slowmotion (like they do) 2-3 seconds after being pushed to the ground is not a long time to determ u are safe.
Hard to judge this one but it is not fair to play it in slowmotion so it look like the white guy purposly acted in a bad way
@Jon BonBon You can't just kill someone for shoving you there is rules to force. Now say he pushed him to the ground and proceeded to cause life threatening harm it may be a bit different. Poor guy didn't need to get shot he was protecting his family like we all would.
0 likes@Jon BonBon the husband heard the confrontation & sees a man standing outside the car with his wife & children. He reacted spontaneously as he didn’t know what the guys intent was with his family!
0 likes@Jon BonBon it was okay for him to harass a woman then couldn’t fight like a man?
0 likesThis is everything wrong with the Americas gun policy...
0 likes@Wes Mantooth Sure the "thug" initiated the assault, but he was sentenced 20 years for a reason, and a very good one at that. This was a simple case of revenge, he had no reason to fire that weapon unless he was in actual danger. If he wanted to handle this situation like it should've been handled then he would've called the police or tried to resolve it right then and there, but he chose the manslaughter route. Anyone who uses a gun for getting pushed to the ground is a complete coward, and if you justify that mans actions then you are also a coward
0 likesIt was way more idiotic to push someone down from behind when there's just a loud dispute. Violence should always be a last resort, and the guy who fired his gun is a massive wimp
0 likes@Jon BonBon nobody said that showing him to the ground was ok..?
0 likesWuway
0 likesWell said
0 likes@Terry Bird What do you like about Biden? Why did you vote for Biden? what do you expect him to do that will surpass trumps many accomplishments and kept promises?, why is Biden better than Trump?
0 likes@Terry Bird I bet you don’t even have an answer like Everyone else I asked this question to, they act like they didn’t see it
0 likes@Wes Mantooth troll or bot?
0 likes@Little Red Writing Head I know you did not read all of my post either or you would not have said what you did.
0 likes@Terry Bird still hiding?
0 likes@Jon BonBon short answer
0 likesYes...
@A-a Ron 4tw dude i’ve pulled into handicapped spots on accident before, it happens. get off your high horse you’re clearly mad as hell you don’t need to take it out in the comments
0 likesThat's exactly what it is though. A fine art. Not every one has an ability or willingness to practice and maintain a high level of minding ones own business.
0 likes@Jon BonBon no one should be killed over something like that simple I'm all for gun rights but instances like this where someone kills someone over dumb shit pisses me off
0 likes@Exarch Gaming exactly same thoughts here man this could've went perfectly in the way of the shooter with out the murder
0 likesTrue. He has no authority to enforce anything. You can't go around finding people doing something you hate with a gun. It's almost like he wanted a reason to kill someone
0 likes@Jon BonBon he's not legitimately handicapped and he has no authority to enforce laws. And why you trying to make it about race? I don't think it matters that he was black.
0 likesNo doubt! People are ruining their lives left and right by not minding their own business.
0 likesThere are so many yt folks like this in the bay…
0 likesOne day, U.S.A will be the real-world equivalent of murim-world. Bloodbath occurs by a mere offend.
0 likesA: "You offend me by not greeting me"
B: "Heh a mere third-class citizen with no cultivation dares to talk-shit !? Be gone !"
A: "Insolence ! Courting Death !"
*Death-match happen
dude should be happy he only got prison time, that wasnt self defense by any stretch.
0 likesCommon fuggin sense
0 likesJust listen to his military, talk as if he was on a mission because he was. He was walking around HIS neighborhood to HIS store so he felt powerful and he felt like the protecter. He had that gun on him which made him feel like a god.
205 likesReplies (15)
Ahsharya Malaak he’s so pretentious
6 likesWhy do people repeat what's already been established in a video. We saw and already heard it. That's why we're here! You're not teaching anyone anything by repeating someone else's examination.
5 likesShhhhhhhh!
@Didi Cortez No one here is obligated to teach you anything. The author's pinned comment is "share your thoughts" . The comment section is primarily used just for that. Each person sets their own topic of discussion by choosing a particular event or statement from the video. If that bothers you - get your ass out of the comment section.
8 likes@Didi Cortez lol not how you thought that'd play out...
5 likesI sorta see it as it's "his" store because he's probably there every day. He admitted he lives not that far away, probably sees a lot of the same people and same things everyday and thought maybe if he made an effort to keep inaproppriate people out of the handicapped spot that maybe the 90yr old WWII vet could get in the store without having to park around and hobble in and explain it over and over everytime the two run into each other
0 likesI guess I'll be the first to admit I have a gas station that's 'my spot' because I go there every time I need gas and I'm not traveling out of state in my commute.
0 likesAh-shar-ya YUP exactly. You know he wouldn’t start that confrontation if he didn’t have his gun on him. This guy is fucking disgusting and makes me want to weep for humanity. I wish I could give Markeis’s family a hug.
2 likes@TMAG MFPP
3 likesPerhaps that inadequacy accounts for why he has dogs instead of children.
@Didi Cortez What is it about "Add a public comment" that you don't understand...?
2 likes@Publius Bang on, mate.
0 likesVery well put
0 likesJoseph Robinson The man was backing away when he saw the gun, so he executed a man for knocking him down. The problem with these guys who get into these situations is 1) they let their fantasies influence their real world decisions, and 2) they don’t recognize the humanity of their victims.
1 like@TMAG MFPP ask his cellmate its size lmao
0 likesI caught that too. He calls it HIS store
0 likes@Joseph Robinson What I would have done is not carry a gun in te first place, because I know that carrying a gun makes it more likely that I murder/manslaughter someone. If I had carried a gun I would have made sure not to seek out confrontations with that woman, since I know that I'd have an increased chance of murdering someone in a confrontation. And if I did carry a gun and sought out confrontations, I would make sure that I knew exactly the rules about which extraordinary situations I would be allowed to shoot and be extremely hesitant to do it, because I would really hate to kill anyone. So if someone retracted I would make sure not to shoot. Because I know that if I carry a gun then the responsibility falls on me not to kill people with it. It's called responsible gun ownership. Being pushed hurts my pride but is not life threatening.
0 likesI mean, assaulting someone because you don’t like what they’re saying is a good way to get shot.
0 likesReplies (1)
Yelling at someone’s family and then shooting them is a good way to get sent to jail.
0 likesMy immediate reaction is, “I wonder if Marquis would still be alive today if some bystander had heard the argument between a clearly antagonistic white man and a black woman and told him to back off and mind his own damn business.”
0 likesThis is why I always pay close attention to arguments whenever I hear them, especially if they involve people of color and white folkx. I’m white and female, I may have the ability to help level the playing field in similar situations by sticking up for someone just minding their business trying to go about their day.
Some of these people can get scared off if someone like them makes them feel even a little bit self-conscious, like nobody wants them there and they’re not being the hero they think they are.
Paramedics arrived within 19 minutes. That’s a joke right.
0 likesHes a guy Karen
5 likesI am extremely glad that you analyzed this shooting.
63 likesWhen I heard about it, I was very upset. It's a situation I feel like I could have been in, my kid in the car and my wife, some maniac approaching with the intention to start something.
I won't and haven't parked in a handicapped space, and I try my best to NOT participate in road rage because of shit like this.
Replies (9)
Oh yeah I would never do that if I lived in America. The chance that anyone has a gun, including a crazy person is far too high.
7 likesWhy the fuck would you feel sympathy for the guy who died, he literally violently pushed the killer to the ground before anything other than a verbal exchange had occurred, heated or not. I understand sympathizing with the kids or the woman, but the guy?
4 likes@trime so the risk of being beat up for something he started justifies taking a man's life?? If he was moving toward him he might've had an argument but once the man starts to back up when he pulls his weapon that shoulda been the end of it. They both shoulda went home.
6 likesThe Platinum Tugboat in all fairness the guy he shot had no right body slamming him to the ground over a verbal altercation. Never would have happened if he kept his hands to himself
5 likesYes, don't approach strangers to start shit.. you never know who it is
1 liketrime you’re gunna let some random man yell at your lady and children without stepping in at all?
2 likesEvan bodyslam? That was a shove at best if he would’ve body slammed him he might still be alive honestly
1 like@Big Fish No, but I'd refrain from violently assaulting the guy when all he's done is TALK to her.
0 likes@laprimavera_ racist? what?
0 likes@10:36 you leave out alot of variables, let a black man attack you.
1 likeMichael Dunn's cousin.
3 likesReplies (1)
For those who haven’t seen it.
0 likeshttps://youtu.be/sVF_SlzxBJ4
I know too many guys just like this. . .
1 likeThat’s ‘Murica for ya. Handing out guns to everybody who wants one. Guns should be reserved for law enforcement only. Letting the public have access to these deadly things causes stuff like this.
6 likesSelf defense doesn’t mean create a situation where you would possibly want to shoot someone.
904 likesReplies (30)
spamking1000 you mean someone SHOULDNT harass a woman by herself until a man comes to her defense and then shoot him claiming self defense? Lol
44 likeshere's what I think, I think drejka shouldn't have fired. But I'm also 100% sure that had he not pulled the gun the man who was shot would have continued to attack him, you can see him walk forward and pull up his pants. He only walks backwards because drejka pulled the gun and the man feared for his life, not because he pushed him down and thought that the argument was over.
23 likesagree in any self defense training they say " find a way out of the situation because 99% of the time there is a escape route or maybe you have to make a presence of a firearm then assess the situation. If he or someone he was with needed wheelchair access then yes he could confront the woman and I am sure the woman would have moved her car no problem but he did not need the use of the ramp so it was NOT HIS PROBLEM!!!! egotistical racist prick.
13 likesSinister Dog but none of that ever transpired. And we can’t police what people “might” have done in a situation if they didn’t do it. So what’s the point?
10 likesSinister Dog false. If I pushed an old man and he’s done and can’t move. That’s it I walk away
2 likesAnd that's all anyone should need to hear! Summed it right up.
2 likesThis.
1 likeTbh, had I been assaulted on the parking lot whilst carrying a glock, I'd empty the magazine on them.
2 likesHe didn't create the situation at all though
2 likes@Wesley Mullins Then he didn't even have to fire it, and like the detectives kept asking, he didn't even say "back off" or anything. It was completely unnecessary for him to fire, even the father started backing up when he pulled it.
6 likes@Mikey Honestly I don't agree with 100% getting rid of them, but just putting much tighter restrictions on them. The restrictions that are there are only for who can and can't buy them, but there's no requirement of knowledge of most handguns or how to operate them. I don't think you should be able to buy anything other than a handgun with a low rpm, and honestly the main reason I still support them is because most death by weapons in America are vastly due to melee weapons such as knives, and a good 90% of firearms that are tied to crimes are illegally obtained which doesn't trace back to a source such as a gun shop. They do a good job at providing self-defense for those who otherwise can't defend themselves in the case of an aggressor, but honestly the man in this video shouldn't have shot it period and the father was already backing off when he did. Also pepper spray would've probably worked really well too, he didnt need a gun.
3 likesCalmly talking to somebody is not "creating a situation." VIOLENTLY shoving somebody out of the blue because you don't like the words they are saying IS "creating a situation." If the dead THUG didn't want a "situation," then he shouldn't have acted like a THUG.
0 likes@deidara _ tough guy alert
1 likeThe other guy shouldn't have pushed him. In America, almost EVERYONE has a gun. If I was the man who got shot, I wouldn't have been so aggressive and stupid to push this other guy on the floor who definitely looked like trouble. 0.0
0 likesThis is one of the reasons I am reserved, especially with those who are clearly looking for a fight.
3 likesHe was asking for it, he shouldn't have been dressed like that. He should know better than to address his African American superiors in such a manner.
0 likes@deidara _ Anime avatar
1 likeIt’s not self defense if you shoot an unarmed man.
2 likes@Mikey " It's also true that, if every Uk citizen had a permit to carry a big fucking weapon, the number would be about 10x that. " - BAHAHAHA. Based on what evidence would that be true? How about you cite some sources, because last I checked there are multiple countries that have really high gun ownershit and low crime. Finland, denmark, france, norway.
0 likesSo those already contradict your claim.
Fun fact, in the UK there is a very high chance that when a breakin happens they do it when the owners are home, somewhere around 80%, but it happens only about 15% of the time in other countries with gun ownership..... i wonder if that has to do with anything.
@Mikey You know when asked to cite something it helps to actually list something useful to what you are claiming. That does not have anything to do with what you just claimed. Tell me did you just find some random link and copy it?
0 likes@Clint McCaleb And the other man embarked on physical assault over just words. Lets not forget the part the other man played. You don't use physical actions against just words. No matter how triggered you are.
0 likes@T. Meyer Well old can be subjective. To a 12 year old 24 years of age can be considered old.
1 likeSaying someone makes less then 100K a year isn't really an insult because you can live a very enjoyable life below that. Also doesn't include possible inheritance, partner making the money. But if you're saying life is miserable under 100k a year, there is a problem.
Limited education, well if you're referring to the school system as it is, that isn't much of an insult anyway. An education doesn't reflect intelligence since its more about memorizing information and just writing it out on tests to get a good grade. That's more of an appeal to authority fallacy since you find default value in the education system that not everyone does.
The same applies to traveling, not everyone cares to travel and you don't need to travel to learn about other cultures. You can talk to people from other cultures over the internet.
A body cannot be shapeless unless it doesn't exist. The concept of shapes were taught in kindergartner.
IF you're trying to say these apply to me, no. Most do not, and the ones that do are not an insult at all, and makes you seem really shallow if those are points that are that valuable to you.
@T. Meyer lol you don't actually know that. Thats also not what makes an alpha. Thats beta talk for a wanna be. But good try.
0 likes@T. Meyer lol leave it to a beta to think they need to start talking trash because they feel the need to prove themselves.
0 likesBefore he even got out of his own vehicle he checked the mag, loaded and cocked the .40 in preparation for his actions while on camera.
0 likesPulling the firearm out gave him an exit. He didn't have to shoot his life was not in damger.
0 likes@COUNTRYBOI I can afford a lawyer, I'll be fine.
0 likes@JokerSleuth Well no but actually no! It's self defense even if you start the altercation as long as you don't escalate the altercation to something physical, since it was a verbal argument and the black guy did what's legally defined as, oh ASSAULT. Then it was most definitely self defense.
0 likesShooting was not justified at all. But he did blind side him. He could of easily said something to the guy and deescalated and went home to have dinner.
0 likeswhen you say create a situation do you mean interact with other people? because I think when that man came up from behind and attacked him he had no idea the man was even there so i dont see how he created the threat as far as he knew she was alone...
0 likesThis guy should not have hired Dom DeLuise as his attorney.
0 likesI’m an average person…ahhh nope!
0 likesThis guy could be played by Christian Bale
0 likesthey got ben shapiro as the prosecutor
0 likesSuspect: “Detective is it okay if I go home after all this?”
2116 likesDetective: “Negative”
Replies (25)
And then they send him home for 25 days
22 likes36:30
@Ostaf yah and then sentenced for 20+ years
20 likes@Ostaf does that even matter Lmaoo dudes in jail for years at the end of the day
3 likes@Ostaf glad we agree
4 likes@Christian Marin Saddest comment I've seen
1 like@Grant Sch how so
1 like@Crockinator07 yah I’m sure he was. But that doesn’t mean you kill someone who is stepping back.
14 likes@Ostaf not necessarily agreeing with Mr. Crock, but i also don't like your insinuation that having an opinion is a criminal offense.
2 likes@kasagure I think it’s just a joke but I get what you’re saying
0 likes@kasagure killing someone for parking in a handicap spot is definitely a criminal offense. Or "teaching people you can't get away with everything and to follow the damn rules" as Crock put it.
13 likes@Ostaf of course! i wholeheartedly agree. however, Mr. Crock has his opinion and you have yours. neither are criminal offenses, merely opinions on said criminal offense.
0 likes@kasagure u thick?
4 likes@LewisÆØÅ asf baby 😩🥵👍
6 likes@Christian Marin even though he didn't do nothing wrong
0 likes@DerPro 2021 his sentence would disagree!
11 likes@Crockinator07 ur a coward bro u get pushed and u think it’s ok to kill ? That man pushed him If he was a man and fought back they’d both be alive
12 likesthe video shown self defense though. the guy was pushed to the ground not asked to step away or police was phoned.
2 likes@Crockinator07 i get what you mean, the woman was wrong for parking there and her husband was an asshole for pushing him. But thats no excuse for shooting him.
4 likesShould've gotten life in prison but i guess 25+ is okay
3 likes@David Cabrera u peep how he ain’t feel no remorse when they told him they victim passed away
3 likes@MMA Reviewer. lmfaooo
0 likes@sam ً you know I love you too right?
1 like@Crockinator07 The only problem is Micheal Drejka is a fearful little puppy that couldn't handle the little tussle that he admitted to starting. When things got real he pulled a gun in a fist fight. That's not self defense, that's being a coward. His life wasn't in danger, only his embarrassment.
2 likes@MMA Reviewer. omg are we married now
0 likes@Crockinator07 If guns did not exist these men will have no way to defend themselves like a true man
0 likesWhy park at a disabled parking spot though? As a disabled person it annoys me to no end to see people who don't have a disabled parking card park because "it's just 5 minutes"
4 likesStill you don't kill them, you talk to people parking there and appeal to their sense of doing the right thing and their sense of shame. Or you approach a nearby police officer who has the car towed (did that a few times) or you deflate their tires (my dad used to do this when I was a kid and people would illegally park on disabled spots)
The guy with the hero complex looking for an excuse to shoot someone is just that and his actions are reprehensible. But I do condone berating people who park in those spots and shouldn't. I drove a car for a while that isn't associated with handicapped people so people would often yell at me or keep watching me as soon as I parked only to apologize when I place the card and take my crutches. That's the preferred method of dealing with people that park at the disabled spot. Not bringing a gun to find an excuse to shoot someone
Replies (2)
I don’t even understand why you feel the need to also berate the woman in this situation? Why bring it up? Anyone who watches this video has no idea what this disabled spot even looks like! I live here and between the rain, heat, and traffic, if a disabled spot has no post and the paint of the ground is not kept up, it can be overlooked if your not specifically looking for it. So for you to even bring up the wife parking there is shitty. It’s like saying she kind of deserves what happened just a little bit… The only reasonable comments should be about how tragic this was not “yeah the guy shouldn’t have shot him but she also shouldn’t have parked there”
1 like@Melissa Coulter If there wasn't a shooting involved this would be a story about a person berating shitty people parking on handicapped spots and then getting violently attacked.....
1 likeThe shooting is tragic but as a disabled person who often has to deal with the handicapped spots (and often toilets too) being taken by shitty people who are healthy I can't sympathize with the woman. it sucks for the kids and the man that got killed. And none of it would have happened if that woman wasn't a terrible person who parks at the handicapped spot
This is the firts interrogation i saw here cops shake his hands with the.....object...
0 likesIn the UK the push would have ended it. However, the USA have guns...I'll say no more.
0 likesHe would of been quiet as a church mouse if he wasn't strapped
0 likesHe should have lost his gun rights after he drew his weapon in four other road rage incidences.
1075 likesReplies (46)
@Robert Grosser well, not for "no" reason; he did assault him. Although it may not have been justified, it's not like he was shot for just standing there.
34 likesPeople shouldnt have a gun at all except for hunting. 33 thousand deaths per year due to weapons in america vs 70 in germany. Adjusted to the same populations thats around 280 deaths, so not even 1% of the weapon deaths
31 likes@Michael B lol bro stop. He killed him for no reason. He wasn't fearful of his life. So basically no reason.
33 likes@TURD BURGLAR Wow bro. Wow
11 likesTURD BURGLAR dude he was backing up when he shot him. I mean I get drawing a weapon when you’re scared, but he was literally backing up. That is absolutely not a deadly threat.
36 likesTURD BURGLAR exactly what I’m saying dude. Nothing wrong with showing a gun if you feel threatened, but theres absolutely no reason to shoot someone dead without giving them a chance to back up.
18 likes@Hagen Re
2 likesMore like 12,000. That number doesn't add-up, probably accidentals, suicides and OIS incidents thrown on top of gang bullshit.
Michael B he WAS shot for just standing there. Once he backed away and wasn’t coming towards him he was no longer a threat. He was shot for standing 6 feet away under the guise of “I thought he was going to hurt me.”
12 likes@TURD BURGLAR Except they can relatively easily "come take it" when they create a massive power discrepancy in favor of the military and police by limiting what 'the people' can legally own.
1 like@Hagen Re, the argument for taking away guns runs contrary to the 2nd Amendment to our Constitution, which says this right may not be abridged or infringed upon, period. It's not a gun problem, it's the criminals who use guns against police and citizens that are the real problem. Your argument has no merit in my country.
6 likes@Hagen Re, our 2nd Amendment to our Constitution doesn't say guns in civilian hands are only for hunting, but this right shall not be abridged or infringed upon, period. The vast majority of the problem here is criminals who use guns to perpetrate crimes against police, business owners, home owners, their spouses and their children. Go pontificate somewhere else.
7 likesFLORIDA
1 like@Michael B , Well, If I was in a car with my kids and a man harassed me I might think he was a kidnapper or something. If she had a gun then she could probably argue justifiable action based on imminent threat. That guy was looking for trouble so he could fulfil his fantasy.
7 likes@TURD BURGLAR good point.
0 likes@Ven Gray Its a right in america not a human right lol. Guns would disappear over time mostly cause they break and other stuff
2 likesTURD BURGLAR you know that there is such a thing like calculating per capita... so yes you can compare these countries. You mention diversity yet everyone knows that the biggest differentiator of the US from developed countries is the lack of good and accessible education and healthcare and the lack of societal accountability in favour of extreme individualism. Sprinkle accessible and widespread gun usage = Todays US. Of course a country wide ban would extremely decrease this scenarios. You can carry arms in many countries but you have to go through a process and you can not buy them at a supermarket. However without proper education and healthcare gun violence will be very desired as a result of the idiocratic development in the US.
7 likes@TURD BURGLAR the victim didn't use deadly force, and may have felt his family was in danger. We can't ask him for his side. If he pulled a gun, I'd agree.
5 likesClassic scared person
1 likeMatthew Burgner yeah the government wants to take your AR because they aren’t sure their tanks, missiles, and bombs are enough.🙄Orr there’s just a horrendous gun problem in America. And I say that as a gun owner.
2 likes@Hagen Re comparing suicides in this type of scenario doesn't really feel fair to me...
0 likes@Michael B I guess you still don't understand that you can't shoot someone who is clearly retreating even if you got shoved and butthurt.
2 likes@Hagen Re people kill not guns. If he didn't have a gun but had a knife would you want to get rid of knives? What if he had a stick? You can go on and on about a killing
1 likeMichael B wow way to take a murders side wanna cookie ?
0 likes@TURD BURGLAR where he fired, but mainly where he apparently didn't actually feel like his life was in danger, and further, where he even continues in the interview after having plenty of time to reflect on the situation that he wouldn't have done anything different. I could find some sympathy for his situation if he misread things in the heat of the moment, but he didn't. He's just a person who spent a lot of time convincing himself that he was man enough to kill someone at the first opportunity, and he did.
0 likes@Hagen Re And there are so many wannabee law enforcement people in Germany, people who would go to your car and lecture you for not having the handicapped sticker. That would be ugly if we had guns everywhere.
0 likes@Colin Nadeau No problem with my guns, if you having a gun problem take it to a gunsmith.
0 likesGrill side Pickin the guy that broke no laws is the only one not alive and thats not right. This should concern you more considering there are people who arent skilled to carry, that carry
1 like@TURD BURGLAR I'll say this. The push was unnecessary. The criminal lies to police, shows no remorse and admits he would just shoot someone instead of fighting them. A threat to his life?A beating isn't the end of the world and it would maybe make guys like this think twice before they draw a weapon infront of kids and take away someone's father over petty nonesense. His god complex and lack of responsible gun use got him in trouble but someone else lost their life. I don't see a push as equal to a killing a human being, nor does the law and nor would you if you had compassion for the victim
3 likesHagen Re except those statistics are skewed, 2/3rds of those are gang on gang violence and the majority of the rest are suicides, I don’t think a German should be throwing stones when it comes to laws put in place to stop tyranny...
0 likesThe 2nd Amendment is not limitless. Many states'
0 likesspecific restrictions carry a provision to the effect that the state legislature may enact laws regulating the carrying, concealing, and/or wearing of arms. The more idiots misuse their gun rights, the more likely this will lead to further restrictions. Which makes perfect sense.
That escalated quickly :DD
1 like@Bobby Dotson Tell this the victims of school shootings. Guns make killings way easier, which is why they are used...and also cowardly from a larger distance. You would not seriously state "bombs don't kill people, so it is ok for everybody to carry a bomb". Maybe gun ownership should only be legal after passing a really complicated test, that might prevent fools from having one
1 likeHahahaha true
0 likes@TURD BURGLAR ahahhhhh gottem, like every one of you guys I call out I stomp so hard you can't even respond lol - you guys fall apart at ANY arguement that's even SLIGHTLY articulated I swear LOL.
0 likes@handsomesmartass.. completely disarming us is probably not going to work. But I am in favor of a closer assessment of the gun owner. If you don't have the capacity to have great respect for guns, and aren't interested in spending time learning how to handle them, or spend time getting familiar with when you might have to protect yourself with one.. consequences. If having to shoot or be killed isn't something you never want to happen. Then I wouldn't trust you with a gun.
1 like@TURD BURGLAR that's what I've always learned. Act responsibly, until someone acts irrationally towards you, then behave 100 times more irrational.
0 likesSmart leaders with a gift for coming up with solutions can influence the attitude of a whole damn bunch of people. I'm a Republican, fairly conservative, and I don't see things the way a whole hell of a bunch of the left does. But they all are my countrymen. That has to carry some weight with the American people. Just the balls to sit down and see if anything can be worked on or solved can have a big effect on people willingness to compromise.
Or we can fight until it's a war.
But your promise to come at folks 100 times more viscous is not very scary.
Probably a better chance you'd start crying to your mama if things ever got as horrible as a war.
Right.. I think it might not be right to start trying to mess with you. But since I know you work out, now, you might find out you enjoy a good ol fight.
0 likes@TURD BURGLAR uh, just no. Nothing about this says, 'white people cannot protect themselves if someone who's black attacks them.' This is about going 0 to 100 in a moment.. using deadly force when none was called for. Not protection. Someone shoves you to the ground (over a confrontation that you started, no less) and your reaction is to shoot them? Fear of getting beat up shouldn't justify using a device that kills easily.
1 like@Ronald Raygun I know, it was likely already addressed later on. I was responding to something that Mr. Turd wrote early on that caught my attention. I didn't scroll through all of the comments to see if anyone had already replied to his statement.
0 likesDon't park in handicap spots.
0 likes@TURD BURGLAR The only reason why the US government isn't taking away firearm ownership rights is because of money. The NRA funds politicians. No government would ever be afraid of those millions of firearm-wielding individuals because a crowd with rifles an army does not make. Actually that's the reason why the National Guard exists: They've got tanks, fighter aircraft, leadership, the whole lot. No amount of individuals with rifles can challenge that. And that's why the "liberty" argument albeit true when it was conceived, doesn't stand any more. It was destroyed the moment the National Guard (let alone the Army and the Marines who would also intervene in a generalized uprising) got tanks, artillery and fighters. They would just pulverise everyone and step on their corpses to get to the rest.
0 likes@Michael B "well, not for "no" reason; he did assault him. "
0 likesHe defended his wife. If he really assaulted Drejka then Drejka would definately not have a change pull out a gun, he'd be on the ground bleeding from a gaping headwound as he was getting kicked in the face.
@Hagen Re guns are only a force amplifier also use per capita numbers not absolute ones
0 likesI disagree guns should be hard to acquire but not illegal
To be fair we have more arson and other violent crime
@Hannah
0 likesIf that would have been you he had shoved down hard to the ground your outlook would be totally different
@Love Pet 🪶
0 likesWe the people will protect ourselves
@yellow95111 lol
0 likessling made from your shirt, nice touch
0 likesYou walk around my car with my wife and kids in it you better have a big gun and don’t miss.
0 likesHe got 20years.
0 likesIf he just minded his own business, this would’ve never happened
5 likesWorst thing anyone can do (guilty or innocent): talk to the police without a lawyer present. That being said, this guy didn't have to shoot as the guy stopped as soon as he saw the gun was being drawn. And then he backed up.
283 likesReplies (16)
Amen. Deny, deny, deny and keep quiet. You're right.
7 likesExactly. The father moved back.
47 likesThis guy was looking for trouble and had no business policing the parking spot.
What’s the legality of brandishing a firearm in self defense? I’m just curious. I thought it was illegal. But yeah ofc I don’t think the dad had murderous intent, just wanted to show who he thought was a jerk to go away (I do not support shoving a dude but I don’t think it constitutes death).
6 likes@spaghetti hi spaghetti, i agree with you and am also curious about its legality.
10 likesALSO FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE: no matter how minor you think the offense your being accused of is (even if its just like shoplifting) ALWAYS ASK FOR AN ATTORNY IMMEDIATELY ! the phrase "anything you say can and will be used against you" is so true. your words will be manipulated even if you are innocent, it is CRUCIAL to have an attorney present whenever you are speaking to officers/investigators, because they are really brutal.
@spaghetti It's sort of a grey area influenced by your jurisdiction's definition of self defense. In most areas (in the US, anyway), if someone verbally threatens you or physically menaces you but has no weapon, and you pull a weapon in response, the person commiting armed assault is *you*. You are the clear-and-present danger to the health and safety of everybody around you.
5 likesIf you're in a situation where someone is threatening you with a weapon (such as a knife, club, or firearm), responding by clearing leather is generally a legally acceptable response. Keeping in mind that pulling the trigger if they're not aggressively trying to homicide you to death immediately swings the other way back into illegal, and 'warning shots' or 'firing into the air' should generally always be considered illegal almost without regard for context.
Insert the usual not-a-lawyer stuff here, etc, etc; I'm just a guy who works in a field where being robbed is an everpresent hazard, knows a couple cops, and has done some independent research.
EDIT:
Apparently Stand Your Ground laws (which state you can respond to deadly force with deadly force) are actually super uncommon east of the Rockies, so legally the correct response—if you're not in a Western Expansion state—is actually probably to run like a mofo if someone is threatening you, even if you believe they're a clear and present threat to your life and have a weapon to counter that threat. shrugs Weird.
@Judy Cook but he assaulted the guy....he asking for trouble.
1 likeHe was probably raised to be aggressive....and he met the real world.
@Abel Jacobo there is a matter of degrees. There was wrong doing at several stages in this affair, but some were worse than others.
6 likes1) parking illegally
2) starting a shouting match, probably not illegal but escalating the situation. Should have taken photos and reported them if he wanted to do something.
3) the push. This was an overreaction, probably a minor assault.
4) the shooting. This was a massive overreaction. Probably murder.
Only one of these acts demands significant jail time.
@Test Test this had nothing to do with a parking spot....this happend because the boyfriend thought he was in a video game and assaulted a guy unprovoked. He had every right to do so under federal law.....state law probably not.
0 likes@Gabe Jenkins I don't own guns personally.....rather fight.....but I completely avoid even fighting because someone could have a gun....you never know...it's best to respect the law and everything will be fine.
0 likes@Abel Jacobo he stopped and backed up there was no reason for him to be shot maybe as a warning he could have just held the weapon out but the guy wasn’t coming at him at the point in the video
4 likes@spaghetti many people have this misconception. It's not true and makes no sense. For instance, I might need to use my gun. Pull it out to prepare myself. Realize I don't need my gun. Put it away. Not illegal.
0 likes@Abel Jacobo I repeat: massive overreaction. I guess we will see if the jury agrees with your interpretation.
2 likes@Test Test legally it was wrong to push the guy.....and also shooting the guy....all.
0 likesMy point is these animalistic impulses to react violently is hidden in everyman....just how the black dude needed to escalate from words to assault.....the white dude felt needed to escalate from assault to homicide.....
It's best not to escalate at all.
Because there's always a level more extreme that can be reached fast.
It depends. If someone assaults you, there is a real possibility that person could knock you out or down and get your gun. Now you're the one who's dead.
0 likes@Brian Schaefer yup...what if the girl shot him right after maybe....he was attacked and out numbered.
0 likes@Abel Jacobo yes, if the incident had stopped at the drawing of the gun I would say the armed man did nothing illegal. It would have been appropriate to make an arrest for the assault and punishment (if a first offence) could have been suspended jail time and a small fine.
4 likesBut no, instead we have a dead man and a murderer because the man with the gun lost all sense of proportion. The only thing that would justify shooting a person is if his own life was in danger, and the video clearly shows that the attacker was backing off once he saw the gun. Firing under those circumstances is murder. "But he started it" is not a justification. It is not his place to dispense "justice" as he sees it, only to defend himself and he went further than that.
So many people here are debating whether or not the father should have pushed Drejka, as if he was somehow asking for it by doing so. That's bullshit. This strange guy was yelling aggressively at his wife with his kids in the car - if anything, Drejka was the one asking for it. In fact, it seems to me he made this whole scene on purpose because he had a territorial delusion about "his store" and an itchy trigger finger. He wanted to shoot someone, and the fact that he wasn't at all sorry for what he did just proves that. You don't start screaming at strangers and then claim you're the one who was wronged when shit goes south. Life doesn't work that way. Drejka is the aggressor here, and a pathetic gun-happy lunatic at that.
2 likesReplies (2)
nope
0 likes@WhiteWolf yep
1 like48:35 The prosecutor calls Markeis McGlockton, Michael several times.
0 likes:"(
0 likesGuns are the main reason I won't go to USA even for a vacation.
0 likesThis is the perfect example of when you have a hammer everything looks like a nail.. he put himself in situations knowing he had a gun, he just wanted to use it.
1155 likesReplies (65)
I don't know about this whole you carry a hammer everything looks like a nail business. I carry a knife with me everyday and I'm not stabbing and cutting s*** all the time.....
36 likes@steelrain7.62API Why would you carry a knife with you everyday ???? WEIRDO !!!
47 likessteelrain7.62API Yea obviously it’s not applicable to everyone but a lot of people think like that
17 likes@steelrain7.62API Exactly. Nothing makes a coward feel brave like a gun.
31 likes@C Jones Not everyone lives in a safe area
22 likes@Jared Dopps No shit Sherlock. . I don’t live in a safe area but I don’t carry a knife with me everyday.
15 likes@C Jones Big difference between a gun and a knife, bro. One is purely for hurting/scaring people and one is an everyday tool. I've carried a pocket knife since I was a Boy Scout, 40+ years ago. I'm hardly going to pull out my Swiss Army Knife in a conflict situation. But, if you're talking switchblades, I'd certainly agree.
25 likes@C Jones A LOT of people carry a knife in their pocket every day. Purely utilitarian.
13 likesI've carried a gun for years and years. I've never shot anyone or even taken it out of its holster.
9 likesWell put! Yes indeed
1 likeAll I Know is that in a street fight Anything can Happen!! Anything it's a very Dangerous situation You Can't Compared a Boxing Fight or a MMA Fight to a Street fight! But if I ever get in a Actual Street fight my Mission is to get the DUDE out!!! ASAP by a Knockout!!! And Bounce
3 likesI have been in 2 real fights during the past 15 years. Luckily not recently. The first one I was cornered in a hallway. I'm gonna be real honest here. The man didnt like me sleeping with his ex in his house. Luckily we weren't doing that but I was cornered. I grappled him, got around, as soon as I let go telling him I wouldn't fight back, he gave me a well deserved black eye. I made amends later by splitting a 12 pack with him months later. The 2nd was just a wrestling match where my opponent threatened to throw me off a 2 story deck. I'm afraid of heights and didnt know that karate moves are my strong point. He ended up face down. No punches were thrown. This guy on the other hand is the instigator but trying to be the enforcer of a parking space and a bully. The gun allowed him to be a bully when he is actually not a good fighter and a pussy. I feel so bad for that mom and her kids. Its men like that coward who will leave the most messed up lasting impression on them. I have a ton of black friends
1 like.. yes invited to come to my house anytime, we talk on the phone, etc. I'm doing everything I can to connect with friends in Liberia, Cagayan de Oro... I have a Muslim gf in Indonesia who is going to visit me in Texas this year if possible. I'll doing my part as many people these days are in making MLKs dream come true. But shithead bullies and murderers like this asshole send us 2 steps back everytime! Pardon my language. Just really sad
@Erik Molnar I don't Trust NO MAN period
1 like@Dog Tube Me neither but I'm not afraid of other men either. I take care of myself so no problems. I'm not criticizing you. But I would like to say that people arent that bad. And if you always stay on the right side of the law, you will have protection. Once you cross that line, your screwed so that's my best advise
1 like@Erik Molnar Yeah I get you , Me either I'm not afraid of no one! What I'm saying that in a street fight it's a whole different World from what I train As a Fighter ..and that my Mission is to Get the K.O ASAP if I ever have to Get in a street fight
1 like@C Jones Self defense? Like legitimate self defense. Or you're regularly doing jobs where it's handy to have a knife on you. In general it can be handy to have a knife. It's a multi purpose tool
2 likes@Seymour Cox So what about situations where people's lives are clearly in danger? The video shows us a case of a legitimate coward, as he had no reason to shoot. However, if say I were to get into a legitimate fight when I wasn't the one to instigate it, and I'm at risk of serious injury or death? I have the right to defend myself. Calling anyone who holds a viewpoint like that a coward shows an ignorance to reality. Most of the time it's not about proving some perception of manliness or bravery, it's merely about defending yourself. Just because cases like the one documented here do show a coward, that doesn't mean most cases follow the same line as this one.
3 likes@steelrain7.62API because a knife has other uses. A gun doesn't. I know ppl just like that. They are constantly wanting to find themselves in some situation where they can blast someone. Those guys are out there. BTW, I'm not directing that at all concealed carriers, just ones like him.
3 likesAlso I work in construction and have many hammers and only nails look like nails. Since you want to get all serious about it lol.
1 like@Rodney Fisk guns are used in the Olympics all the time they have many other purposes than just to kill.....or scare Democrats.
3 likesSteelrain he was talking about Drieka mate, NOT YOU!
1 likeC J a lot of people carry pocket knives lol weird you’re not surprised by that
1 likeLesson learned, dont assault people. You might get shot one day
1 like@Johnathan Busse the saying isn't meant to be literal lmao. guns literally have 2 uses, make loud bang bang and to hurt/damage something/someone.
2 likes@lifesarisk actually there are more than 2 uses. There are let's see flare guns,squirt guns, bb guns, hand guns, rifles, signal guns that only shoot blanks to signal the start or end of somthing I could go on all day. You need to do some research with your entire bang bang theory. Its ignorance that kills people not guns
1 like@Johnathan Busse when you mentioned why a knife might be useful you stated what any knife can be used for, you didn't say a knife can be used for many things like kitchen knives, pocket knives, etc.
1 likesquirt guns and bb guns are completely irrelevant as they aren't what we're talking about, a signal gun is less relevant as it's just a gun without the damage part, hand guns and rifles are used for loud bang bang or to hurt/damage something/someone, that just leaves flare guns which could be grouped with squirt guns and bb guns but they're pretty different so we can add to my list "make big light (in the case of a flare gun)"
although everything you mentioned falls under the title gun there is a big difference between a mansion and a shack or a lamborghini and a honda.
@steelrain7.62API - I think you missed Maurice's point - when Drejka was asked by the cops why he wasn't worried that by initiating a confrontation that confrontation could escalate, his answer was that he wasn't worried because he was armed.
1 likehe basically admitted that he was happy to escalate any confrontation to the point that he would shoot his way out of it.
that is very much a "carry a hammer everything looks like a nail " kind of mindset
@steelrain7.62API not everybody who's carrying is just looking to shoot somebody, but everybody that's looking to shoot somebody is carrying
1 likeam i wrong to lack empathy for people who responds with violence before anything else, im not saying the dude deserved to get shot but idk be civilized? and you will never get shot by stupid people.
4 likes@C Jones A lot of people carry a pocket knife..
1 likeExactly
1 likeYep and they gave him a reason too
1 likeif you dont want to get hurt, dont go brutally pushing people to the ground and making them fear for their life. he was 100% justified, deal with it.
1 likeC J some people either carry a knife (like a pocket knife) or a gun, depending on where you live or the kind of life you live, I don’t think it’s weird
1 like"everytime someone cuts me in line at whole foods i think to myself, am i about to smoke this motherfucker?"
1 like@C WG well obviously he wasnt since hes serving 20 years right now lol. The guy was backing of. He wanted to take revenge, which is why hes serving right now.
1 like@Gorgeous George ..... I'm not carrying a knife to feel more secure in social situations... It is a tool. I've never been afraid to go down dark alleyways knife or no.
1 like@Gorgeous George Fear is not my friend it is the mind killer.
1 likeOne guess, which party do you think he votes for?
1 likethis is the exact scenario for which the hammer and nail analogy was made, superbly put
1 like@Jangus Roundstone i dont consider courts infallible. nah, dont want to get shot, dont lay a hand on someone. simple as that.
0 likesSpot on
0 likes@Seymour Cox or just not have gotten into a fight about shoes? Take the ego hit and walk away, but that's too much for some people.
0 likesWas just thinkin the very same thing.! 👌 Every one is a hard man when packin heat! A real hard guy Startin a fight with a woman too.. He shoulda kept his mouth shut there was plenty other non handicapped spaces that were even closer to the shop door, so yeah I think he definitely wanted to use his gun man! ✌
0 likes@C Jones I'm a carpenter and live on a farm I carry a knife every day too coz I need one every day.. Do t carry it to go shopping and shit though lol
0 likes@C WG if your wife or GF an kids are being shouted at aggressively you'd wanna protect them. But your right. He coulda talked to the guy instead of pushing for sure man. I think the guy that shot wouldn't have acted so brave pickin on a woman if he didn't have a gun.!
0 likes@Gorgeous George u live in uk I bet mate yeah? Coz I understand what u mean. Most young guys that carry knives there end up killed or slashed up on a daily basis! Knife crime in UK is outta hand. It's crazy, I'm from Ireland so I see an hear it all
0 likes@ken dalton women can stand up for themselves better than many men can. it usually ends in the harasser giving up and walking away with their tail between their legs. but once a white knight gets involved? then it suddenly turns into a potentially deadly situation.
0 likes@Jangus Roundstone thats not how this works. no matter how deeply someone offends you with their words, once you escalate to violence anything that follows after that was your gamble.
0 likesVast, vast majority of ppl who carry never use it. You don’t hear about it because it doesn’t make news.
0 likes@steelrain7.62API you are 100 percent more likely to stab someone that doesnt carry a knife tho aint u......
0 likesNew M00N did he tho? The law says different.. he started an issue with someone’s wife and kids over something that didn’t have anything to do with him and then he couldn’t take his ass whooping like a man so he shoots him.. that’s the type of man you respect? One that can’t pick up his fists and fight for himself? Couldn’t be me
1 likeDont expect to walk out of a situation unscathed after attacking someone. Glocktons death was a suicide
1 likeAnd Americans still believe it's nothing wrong with their laws when in comes to gun licensing. Everyone running up and down with guns like back in the days in wild wild west
1 like@Jangus Roundstone
0 likesIf he wasnt a threat he would still be alive...
Great comment because it fits perfect to what happened.
0 likes@Jangus Roundstone
0 likesYou do realise this case is waiting for an appeal and will be thrownout and gone to retrial right?
@Jangus Roundstone Low IQ Summation... See: Darren Wilson
0 likesNew M00N if you are THAT SCARED of being pushed like that, you should not interact with any strangers in public! NONE! You should hide at home!
0 likes@boagski
0 likesboagski
If you are scared of being shot dead after pushing someone like that, you should not interact with any strangers in public! NONE! You should hide home!
Dominant Persona hahaha your name is ironic! I get it
0 likes@Jangus Roundstone
0 likesGood Job, reaffirming my point.
@Jangus Roundstone
0 likesLollllllllllll Projection noticed
Perfect way to summarize it. It's just like owning a sports bike and getting that itch to go on a white-knuckled ride.
0 likes@Sydnarella Exactly. The same is true of 99.9% of guns in the US. Now, imagine a society where nobody carried guns. Wouldn't that be nice? Well, that is the rest of the developed world. People only carry guns around in war-torn, third world countries. Americans are unique, in that they will give up 50 of their children every week, for their "right to be bear arms". Yet, their right to bear arms is all based on fear. So, their fear is greater than their love for their children. The rest of the world can't understand that.
0 likesIts Back!
11 likesThat is REALLY not a smart guy.
0 likesits at that moment he knew fucked up ....
0 likes“THE HIP TWITCH”
1 likeReplies (1)
Haha yeah the ol' hip twitch 🤣
1 likeIt just amazes me that people just blab away and don't lawyer up. Unbelievable. 🤦♀️😓
53 likesReplies (6)
Frees Peach Why does it make y’all so mad that they talk? We get justice thanks to them being stupid enough, and the detectives doing their job. It’s the best that can happen
3 likes@Míriam Who is mad?
8 likesjonnygotagun I don’t mean mad, mad. I mean the comments that seem to find it so disappointing. Makes me feel like they’re telling the murderers to be safe lol
0 likes@Míriam You're reading your own bias into it. I made a statement about how incredible it is that they don't know their rights and don't shut up and lawyer up. Their Mirandized, but just ignore that and dig themselves in deeper. I'm talking about their rights! It's got nothing to do with wanting them to get away with anything.
4 likesIn this case I think it demonstrates an overall lack of intelligence, something which is almost a mitigating factor.
2 likesFrees Peach I didn’t mean it like in a super serious way. I was following the conversation with my point of view. Also, I’d like to think even if they got a lawyer, they would end up screwed anyway, just because karma, or the astronomical stupidity that made them murder someone in the first place. Like in this case, this shithead’s narcissism made him think he was gonna get away w it and he was friends w the detectives 🤦♀️
0 likes50:14
0 likes"I am fucked"
Mind your own business!! Don't start shit for no reason .
2 likesdrekja just mind your own business
0 likesA Male Karen. People just mind your own business.
0 likesIf you’re the type to let illegal parking bother you, you aren’t cut out to be the type who carries a gun.
402 likesReplies (18)
I agree. If illegal parking bothers you , get a ticket book.
27 likes😂😂😂😂
1 likeIt was almost certainly racially motivated- not illegal parking. After all, he illegally parked next to the woman to badger her about her parking. The illegal parking was an "excuse to rightfully get pissed off at some black people" and the push was clearly an "excuse" to shoot a black man as well.
16 likesIf he even once said the word "violent thug" in reference to that man, that's proof enough of racial motivation. He was just looking for an opportunity to shoot someone and get away with it. If the CCTV wasn't there, he probably would've gotten away with it because that's unfortunately how the police and judicial system also paints black men. He probably would've gotten away with the "self-defense" defense if it hadn't been for that CCTV footage.
He clearly wanted to shoot someone and has this gross fetish with the military (which he was probably prohibited from enrolling in because he made it too obvious that he wanted to shoot someone) shows that his admiration with the people who serve is connected with his sick desire to just shoot people in the name of "justice".
Kat Howard ok Kat... media got you goood
11 likesExactly. I don't think anyone here is saying parking in a handicap space, and even shoving a man to the ground for harassing your wife/gf is right, but it is absolutely no reason to kill a man over. Especially when him just pulling the gun ended the altercation completely. But his ego, and wannabe cop bs made him get into a situation he had no business being in and lose his restraint and pull the trigger when it was absolutely unnecessary. People like this cannot be allowed to carry a gun.
4 likesLaces out no doubt
3 likes"If you’re the type to let illegal parking bother you, you aren’t cut out to be the type who carries a gun."
3 likesYou realize that you're describing all police officers, right? LOL
Voluntarist Shitting on the cops in 2020. So edgy.
1 like@V Lol, you are not wrong.
0 likes@Kat Howard I agree that there some racial motivation is likely, mostly because he mentioned how he tries to "not let that come out of him" or something along those lines, mentilning his grandfather I believe. Sorry, I honestly didn't feel like searching the video from it. But I just don't know if that's really what made him oull this trigger, seems like a wannabe cop more than anything.
0 likesGood point
1 like@The Fourth Man Don't you understand how big it is to take someone's life? You have to take a measured approach, otherwise why not just give the death penalty for any law broken for any reason? You're thinking about you're right to shoot and likely kill. Think about the victim that is killed over something that's just a good reason to be killed over. Don't you see how he waited, and then shot?
0 likesLook at that... they're little footballs
0 likesThe Fourth Man if the shooting was justified he wouldn’t be in the penitentiary, friend.
1 likeThe Fourth Man oh... you’re one of ‘those’ people.
1 likeThe Fourth Man Am I being detained?
0 likesGenius profile picture!!! Finkle IS Einhorn... Einhorn IS Finkle!
1 likeThe Fourth Man thank you Fourth Man. Very cool!
0 likesAbout 15 minutes into this interview, he should have uttered the following words, "I want a lawyer"! I cannot emphasize enough the value of legal representation in this situation.
1 likeReplies (2)
That’s your take? Sounds like you are preparing for something….
0 likes@Ur Duffer I wouldn't call it my take, I just feel that this peanut would have done himself a favour by asking for a lawyer.
0 likesDon't talk to the police. Ever.
0 likeshe sounds like adam sandler
0 likesTo say that he is the victim is seriously offensive...
0 likesI love SO much when they ask a million questions just to get the person deeper and deeper into the lie...all the while the suspect thinks the police are believing them so they just keep talking and talking.
181 likesReplies (2)
Y’all didn’t report that guys comment? He talked about jizzing in that persons hair. Not the right place.
0 likes@AppleSauwse not everyone is a cry baby who likes to tell on everyone
0 likesDefinition of mind ya buisiness
0 likes34:36 Say no more 🤐.
0 likesThat's why I hate gangster's nowadays scared to fight act tuff behind a gun ...
0 likesANYONE ELSE JUST SO FLABBERGASTED THAT THIA MAN IS SO CHILL THAT HE TOOK SOMEONES LIFE JUST LKE THAT
0 likesReplies (1)
like he does not feel bad for that poor guy at all and fully beleives he had a right to do that🙁
0 likesPeople who are secretly *hoping* that they will have to use their guns are pathetic. And they shouldn't own a gun.
261 likesReplies (7)
@BlazingRage ew
7 likes@gumshake jokes on you I don't even own a gun and said this just to trigger
10 likesThat is why he would go to his store looking to see who was parked in the handycap space.
4 likesI hope I never have to use it but, better to have one and not ever need it then to need one and not have it. I go to the range too. Have a lil fun.
3 likes#AlpineShootingRange
welcome to america
1 like@BlazingRage nice gun pun
1 like@gumshake you were the first to notice here 🍪
0 likesHah got one good job
0 likes4:04 - marquise not found
0 likesYou know, we are all smart asses when we sitting at home watching this but if we stuck in the same situation, we would be worse than animals
1 likeThis dude thought that just because he had a gun he could do whatever he wanted and treat people however he wanted.
6 likesIt's so scary to see someone truly think they did nothing wrong and behave so calmly after shooting and killing someone. Like they expect high-fives or something and don't feel at all guilty.
495 likesReplies (11)
Exactly It's the same entitled demeanor as the 3 in Ahmaud Abery murder and that murderer guy- Dunn,
11 likes@Looking 4 Things
2 likesLol actually it has nothing to do with that case at all... but ok
It's due to the fact that a lot of ppl don't understand laws... in fact probably only 20 or 30 percent of the American population really have decent understanding of laws I'm guessing and most of them are probably lawyers or involved in law in some way. Ppl think that of u get into an altercation u can just shoot someone and say u were defending yourself. The law is pretty complex and the statutes put in place are for specifications of situations. Most ppl don't understand the law or have misconceptions which lead them to thinking things like this are ok for them to do and then they're surprised when they go in front of actual lawyers and prosecutors who inform them they can't
3 likesIt is truly disturbing
0 likes@Looking 4 Things
0 likesLol maybe in the other cases but I'm not sure there was honestly any racism in this case. The guy shot some guy he felt threatened by and made a terrible decision, that's pretty much it.
It's got nothing to do with his race
Hmm....I don't know. Michael could've legitimately feared for his life in that moment with a big black man who just shoved him to the ground standing over him. He shouldn't have shot, especially if the black guy backed off after the firearm was brandished...but I don't know if this situation is so black-and-white (excuse the pun).
1 likeCalm down folks. The guy ran up and assaulted him. You shouldn't assault people....when you hit someone they can escalate to shoot you . It's sad the msn died....he should not have been assaulting the man...the consequences were a fatal shooting...
1 like@Looking 4 ThingsIt is also because of people like you that racism will never end. New generations are much more tolerant, but there is always someone out there that make sure the word racism it's daily mentioned.
1 like@F T "The cornerstone of mental health is accepting reality" --Dr. Bessel Van der Kolk
1 like@T W Any real man would have reacted exactly the same way. When your family including your young children are risk a real man would do everything he possibly could to protect them. He behaved exactly as Id want my father to in the situation.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things I honestly can’t tell if you’re a troll or a genuine crazy person.
0 likesRevelation 21 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth. For the first heaven and the first earth was gone, and the sea is now no more.
0 likes2 And I John saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from Lord God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
3 And I heard a great voice from the throne, saying: Behold the tabernacle of Lord God with men, and he will dwell with them. And they shall be his people; and Lord God himself with them shall be their Lord God.
4 And Lord God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes: and death shall be no more, nor mourning, nor crying, nor sorrow shall be any more, for the former things are passed away.
5 And he that sat on the throne, said: Behold, I make all things new. And he said to me: Write, for these words are most faithful and true.
6 And he said to me: It is done. I am Alpha and Omega; the beginning and the end. To him that thirsteth, I will give of the fountain of the water of life, freely.
7 He that shall overcome shall possess these things, and I will be his Lord God; and he shall be my son.
8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, they shall have their portion in the pool burning with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.
9 And there came one of the seven angels, who had the vials full of the seven last plagues, and spoke with me, saying: Come, and I will shew thee the bride, the wife of the Lord God Lamb.
10 And he took me up in spirit to a great and high mountain: and he shewed me the holy city Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from Lord God,
11 Having the glory of Lord God, and the light thereof was like to a precious stone, as to the jasper stone, even as crystal.
12 And it had a wall great and high, having twelve gates, and in the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel.
13 On the east, three gates: and on the north, three gates: and on the south, three gates: and on the west, three gates.
14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them, the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lord God Lamb.
15 And he that spoke with me, had a measure of a reed of gold, to measure the city and the gates thereof, and the wall.
16 And the city lieth in a foursquare, and the length thereof is as great as the breadth: and he measured the city with the golden reed for twelve thousand furlongs, and the length and the height and the breadth thereof are equal.
17 And he measured the wall thereof an hundred and forty-four cubits, the measure of a man, which is of an angel.
18 And the building of the wall thereof was of jasper stone: but the city itself pure gold, like to clear glass.
19 And the foundations of the wall of the city were adorned with all manner of precious stones. The first foundation was jasper: the second, sapphire: the third, a chalcedony: the fourth, an emerald:
20 The fifth, sardonyx: the sixth, sardius: the seventh, chrysolite: the eighth, beryl: the ninth, a topaz: the tenth, a chrysoprasus: the eleventh, a jacinth: the twelfth, an amethyst.
21 And the twelve gates are twelve pearls, one to each: and every several gate was of one several pearl. And the street of the city was pure gold, as it were transparent glass.
22 And I saw no temple therein. For the Lord God Almighty is the temple thereof, and the Lord God Lamb.
23 And the city hath no need of the sun, nor of the moon, to shine in it. For the glory of Lord God hath enlightened it, and the Lord God Lamb is the lamp thereof.
24 And the nations shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth shall bring their glory and honour into it.
25 And the gates thereof shall not be shut by day: for there shall be no night there.
26 And they shall bring the glory and honour of the nations into it.
27 There shall not enter into it any thing defiled, or that worketh abomination or maketh a lie, but they that are written in the book of life of the Lord God Lamb.
I wonder what went through the victims head when he desided to initiate physical violence. "Somebody is arguing with my partner so I'm going to push them to the ground."
1 likeDid he deserve to die? Probably not. Was he a "good guy"? Definitely not.
Replies (1)
Yeah he was the one who escalated the situation from verbal to physical. Dude won a Darwin award as the strange folk over on reddit like to say.
0 likesany notice the guy in the white shirt during the prosecution's closing arguments? bruh looks straight up dead lmao
0 likesHey mike mind ur fkn business n things like this dont happen
1 likeI don’t think he was ever scared for his own life, I think he was ticked off he was pushed and wanted to get him back. His ego got really bruised and he felt he had the right to retaliate.
729 likesReplies (26)
This guy wont do well in jail. It will be hell.
16 likesHe carries the gun because he wishes to take it out and use it
16 likesI'm not saying you're wrong, it's clear this guy was far too ready to use his gun and had road rage issues but... Why the hell did the guy shove him to the ground?
6 likesWell said
1 likeI think so too. The Guy backing Up after the Push.. obviously...
1 like@Magical fairy Oh I agree he didn't deserve to die for the decision, absolutely - it's just I don't understand it. It might be because I'm British, but in a country where it feels like everyone seemingly has a gun - and especially in a state with the SYG law - it just seems absolutely insane to attack the guy instead of getting in between the situation and saying "hold up, what the hell are you doing?"
3 likesDrejka is guilty as hell obviously, but it's not hard to imagine a situation where the shooting is reasonable; if the guy didn't take half a step back, there's suddenly a world of reasonable doubt in play.
@Lee K i apologize for coming off as defensive or rude. I wasn’t expecting such a mature and actually thought out reply so I appreciate it actually and can see your point
2 likes@Magical fairy I didn't see your reply as defensive and rude at all ^^ No problem whatsoever. I can see why you'd think I'd be one of those internet nutters trying to excuse the murder (and perhaps I should have detailed more in my initial post given the issues around discussions on race/police excesses of power etc. in modern society), but no, it's honestly just the mentality of the situation that intrigued me.
0 likesThank you for your replies :)
I disagree honestly. While he was probably pissed hindsight is 20/20, if I got pushed like that I would’ve definitely pulled my gun. But I likely wouldn’t have fired that quickly when he backed up.
1 like@Zasha exactly pulling the gun is a thing most people would do if they were armed, but he watched him take 3 steps back and still kept pulling the gun out waited 1 second and shot him, no reason for that coulda said back up or something instead of shooting him after watching him back off
0 likesDrejka wanted to be that guy on the news who was forced to shoot someone to save his own life. He was looking to pick a fight so they would attack him and give him the ability to kill someone. I think he paused before firing the shot so that he could go over a check list in his head. I hope he never gets out of prison and I hope he lives a long time.
4 likes@Lucius Kiirus His plan fell down the sink when was discovered that he harassed people previously in the same location and the gun threats that he did in the past. Some people want to violated the speed limit after buying a car, Drejka was itching for use his concealed carry and gun to kill someone.
1 like@P L I believe you are right, he wanted to kill someone. In my mind, a rational person who buys a gun might do so for defense with the hope they never have to use it. I think a person who is armed needs to actively avoid trouble when any other option is available. That does not however mean they don't go out and enjoy life. Just avoid known trouble. Drejka was looking for it. I hope people view this case as an opportunity to learn. So sad for the victims.
0 likes@P L wow. This shows it was waiting to happen... He was so eager to use the weapon.
0 likesHe literally flew when my dude shoved him, to be honest I don't think it he pushed him that hard, rather it was a solid push and Michael went down because for one, he was no match to the other guy, physically and second he was in a bad angle and didn't stand his ground when the push came, meaning his gravity center was immediately fucked and he flew. That shit certainly bruised his ego bad. Also, he took his sweet time before shooting, sooo the intent was there. My dude backed away a lot and froze, he probably would've dipped if it wasn't because hi girlfriend and the kids were RIGHT THERE.
1 likeHe's a racist looking for a fight.
0 likesConsidering that he was awkwardly down on the ground, once he drew the pistol his options to respond were drastically reduced.
0 likesAbsolutely agree
0 likesVery well said and this is exactly what happened i think, he hesitated to shoot. It took a couple seconds, but he was so angry that he still shot him
1 like@Lee K he might have been an aggressive type of person. His wife + kids were in the car and a stranger is making trouble with her. Not everyone handles everything with talking, and he's wrong for pushing him. Doesn't mean he had to be shot
0 likes@Lee K i agree..
0 likesTrue and I think it was also because the man was black.
0 likes@Tim if the state would have said what Diana said I think the jury would have given him the maximum! He got off easy
0 likesYes, exactly what I see. As a Marine we are trained to employ violence at a threat. The only threat I see is his ego was bruised because he was pushed to the ground quicker than he could have repelled it. He was attacked, this is obvious and it was a bad decision on attackers part, however...this idiot said attacker stepped toward him, thus tripping the 21 foot rule. Total bullshit. The victim now is the person shot. Drejka should have admitted he made a bad call, got up and walked away. Instead he decided to shoot a man that 'put him in his place', rather than be a man and leave, which is probably what he'd have done if he hadn't been armed, he did the ultimate stupid and cost a man his life over a fucking parking place...un fucking real.
0 likes@Ricky Rickardo he ain’t in jail, he’s a free man.
0 likesYou don’t know what he was feeling
0 likesWhat did he get
0 likesWhat's the name for a male Karen?
0 likesWhen stupid meets nasty. If only stupid's partner had parked properly
0 likes40:40 voice did not match lol
0 likesI’ve always been taught everyone who carries a weapon has an obligation to avoid confrontation unless completely necessary.
633 likesReplies (41)
Exactly. You certainly don't go out of your way to look for a confrontation.
35 likes@Youtube person Well the criminal case wasn't about whether he should've been there or not, it was whether he used self defense in a legal manner which he did.
16 likesBy the way, these two situations, Rittenhouse and this have absolutely nothing to do with each other besides the fact that someone used a gun and someone died.
Then why even carry a weapon when confronting is like a necessity in the society we are in.
2 likes@Youtube person can you explain how you know that kyle rittenhouse intentionally put himself into a situation to use his weapon? Did he telepathically convince those men to attack him? Was it that he simply existed in the area with a gun? Do you know that it is legal to stop people who are actively committing a felony? So if someone is looting/rioting those are felony offenses, if you try to stop them you are 100% allowed to do so, and when they violently attack you then you’re allowed to protect yourself.
21 likes@Youtube person id argue theres nothing illegal or wrong about trying to stop or prevent the commission of a felony. I could argue that the aggressors shouldn’t have been there. Kyle Rittenhouse was there NOT committing crimes surrounded by people who WERE committing crimes. And he’s in the wrong in your opinion?
12 likes@N Lyne if you can confirm visually that the attacker has a knife/gun and ready to use it on you/someone else and there is a threat of loss of life then you can use your handgun. Otherwise it's walking on thin ice and you have to be ready all the time. You're right. It would be worth it to just carry a taser or something. I think anything but a gun would be easier to explain.
1 likeI learned that point from Active Self Protection so so important that you are a sane level headed and do everything in your power to avoid confrontation and even when faced with verbal or physical confrontation that you just keep trying to apologise/ take it on the chin or keep trying to move away - better you let someone push you and you just get up and move away than resorting to lethal force - total Discredits the actual purpose of having it which is only for true life or death scenarios
5 likes@cjjj e glad i amuse you. Can you tell me which of his points i didnt answer? And of course it wasnt a coincidence, if i were going to be in an area surrounded by violent felons i’d want a rifle too. I still dont see how that makes kyle the instigator in the situation. In my opinion you’re willfully ignorant.
4 likes@Josh Bowen so u agree that he left his home with a loaded rifle and crossed state lines with the intention to be violently confrontational, how does that make him any better than these "violent felons" when violence was his first and only resort/intention?
4 likes@cjjj e well if you watched any of the case you’d know that he didnt cross state lines with the rifle (which isnt even a crime had he done so), his father lived and kenosha and kyle also worked in kenosha. Hes better than those violent felons because he wasnt committing felonies, and its solely your speculation that he went there with the intention of hurting anyone. He only shot people who were violently attacking him. Him being there with a weapon isn’t provocation, he has a constitutional right to be there with a firearm for his own protection. Please show me the evidence that he went there with the intention of shooting people. And again, possession of a firearm isn’t evidence of someone intending to shoot people.
5 likes@Josh Bowen and its solely your speculation that he didn't go there with the intentions of being violently confrontational, what other reason would he have for being right there right then with a loaded weapon on display? Do u think he wanted to have a friendly and peaceful conversation with a rifle slung over his shoulder? What were his intentions seeing as you're so sure it wasn't confrontation and violence?
5 likes@cjjj e well im not speculating im just stating the facts as they were layed forward in the case and going off of the evidence. You asking me for evidence that he didnt have certain intentions is asking me to prove a negative. Look up “burden of proof”, when you make a claim the burden to provide evidence is on you. Its not my job to disprove your claim, its your job to prove it. And yes he very well could have had a peaceful interaction with a rifle slung over his shoulder. Someone exercising their second amendment right is not evidence that they are looking for a fight.
5 likes@zero8kira In the case of Kyle Rittenhouse the actual perpetrators testified that they did indeed threaten to take Kyle Rittenhouse's life within his earshot while on trial. They denied that fact on the media but they did admit it on trial.
6 likes@OneManWolfPack i didn't mention anything about Rittenhouse in my comment. Nor was it mentioned in the original comment so where did that come from?
1 like@Youtube person Rittenhouse isn't a vigilante, he was running away, a crowd of people chased him, and he defended himself. You can't say he put himself in that situation when he was literally running away from the situation. Running away from someone is about the most non threatening thing you can do to them
6 likes@Youtube person he didnt commit any crimes though
3 likes@Dynamo_0 the fact is he shouldn’t have been there with a weapon in the first place.
0 likes@N Lyne yuh cause it's normal to confront someone by sneaking up on them and shoving them lmfao
0 likesI guess I'll just start cutting in front of cops in line at my local 7-11 :)
0 likes@cjjj e - no, he did NOT “leave his home with a loaded rifle” NOR did his actions recorded earlier in the evening and up
3 likesto the attacks on him by criminals, display ANY “intent to use it”
You are HORRIBLY mis informed on the sequence of actions and events. I forgive you for that, to the extent that the MSM has been repeating outright lies about the case from the moment it happened.
@Youtube person - starting dumpster fires and threatening the guy who puts them out, before the CRIMINALS could roll it up to the gas pumps in a gas station, is NOT “interrupting a crime in progress?”
2 likesYOU have SERIOUS logical, and factual issues...
@Youtube person Fact is the law and the jury are in Rittenhouse's favor. The fact you don't acknowledge his innocence just goes to show how even cops like you can be ignorant of the law and fail to understand such a basic verdict.
2 likesGood thing you weren't on that jury.
@Youtube person - then you and your compatriots should have refused to stand down while Kenosha burned! Kyle had and has every right to be there, every right to be armed, and every right to defend himself when attacked by CRIMINALS... As we both know, your job does not legally require you to protect and serve... So someone’s gotta do it, and Kyle did more to protect and serve Kenosha than any of the officers “standing down” that riotous evening. But it sounds like you are the type of “just following orders” officer, who would have been with the redcoats, in 1776, and the third reich, during WWII.
2 likesI’ll take a single, well armed citizen of righteous morals, over a hundred of you..
Worked for Kyle Rittenhouse
0 likes@Youtube person false
0 likes@Youtube person kyle rittenhouse was there in the first place because the police (you probably being one of them) weren’t there to stop people from committing felonious crimes. Its a bit moronic to say “kyle rittenhouse shouldnt have been there he should let the police do their jobs and not be a vigilante” meanwhile the police are nowhere to be found while people are creating anarchy. Touch grass.
2 likes@Youtube person also funny that you call rittenhouse a “kid” but the prosecutors didnt view him as a kid when they tried him as an adult. I bet money if he was found guilty and sent to prison for life you wouldnt be arguing that hes just a kid. Youd be treating him like an adult and youd be glad hes in prison with other adults.
1 like@Youtube person so a 17 year old kid doesnt have the right to self defense that an 18 year old has? Where does it say that in the law? You swore an oath as a police officer to protect and uphold people’s constitutional rights, you should know that the right to self defense is afforded to people of all ages. Why wasnt the 14 year old who shot the robber in the face arrested and tried as an adult? Because people have the right to protect themselves is why.
1 like@N Lyne What kind of confrontations do find find are necessary? You carry a gun to protect yourself and those immediately around you from deadly force. You avoid using deadly force unless deadly force is brought upon you. If somebody wants a fistfight you try to avoid it at all costs, and if you can't avoid it you use the appropriate amount of force to the force being applied to you. Guy has fists and just punched you? Fight your way out or run away (running is the first option!), but unless you are sure they intend to kill you why would you take their life? If somebody punches someone do they get the death sentence? Should they? I would hope you think not.
0 likes@N Lyne depends on the state but Kyle Rittenhouse didn't start any of the conflicts he was involved in unlike this guy who initially started the problem.
1 like@cjjj e the rifle wasn't at Kyle's house and the rifle never crossed state lines... Maybe if you want to pretend to be smart you should learn the facts of the case you are lying about..
1 like@Adian Alvarez the rioters shouldn't have been there either
1 like@Visassess Explain how he used his weapon in self defence…where was his life threatened for him to use deadly force?
0 likesReally? I've not heard that particular ethical consideration when it comes to carrying a weapon. That said, I'm Canadian and there are no weapons here except those legally employed for hunting....I wish more people had the same approach as you when it comews to carrying a weapon. The world might be a bit gentler and safer place.
0 likes@Josh Bowen Rittenhouse was 17 at the time. Isn't that illegal?
0 likes@Looking 4 Things nope, watch the court case. That charge was thrown out because it was not illegal for rittenhouse to have the rifle. More people need to watch the case, and watch less biased lying media, and maybe people wouldn’t be so uninformed.
1 like@Surinaam false.
0 likes@Josh Bowen Very convincing argument.
0 likes@Surinaam same to you.
0 likesAgreed. It’s what we like to call “mind your own business”
0 likesGood for you?
0 likesThe black guy was also wrong. Without even enquiring for a second about what's happening, he just push the man to the ground within one second just because the man was arguing with his wife? Who knows what's will happen if he didn't pull out his gun. Everyone commenting and justifying the black guy just because they don't want to sound racist? That's absurd. I'm not on the killer's side, he is guilty no doubt. But the guy who got shot was also definitely on the wrong.
3 likesReplies (2)
@ethancx Fan Yes he is. He is not the victim until he got shot and died. He was the first abuser. Open your eyes!
0 likestru
1 likeNot saying this guy was justified but tbh this whole situation could’ve been avoided if they just parked legally and it’s even worse when you see all the available spaces they could’ve parked but all in all he shouldn’t have shot at that man
1 likeReplies (7)
Remind me where Drejka parked again?!?!?
0 likes@Herbert West in one of the many
0 likesOpen spaces available at that gas stations parking
@Chef dat boi rd 3 Nope. Try again.
0 likes@Herbert West go watch the video footage. Your don’t have much of an argument here 😂
0 likesSo it’s okay to park illegally as long as you’re telling someone else not to park illegally?
1 like@Chef dat boi rd 3 Drejka was parked illegally himself which is the ultimate irony of this whole thing 😂🤣
0 likes@Herbert West yeah but Drejka isn’t the one dead the point of my comment was to point out how that man could still be alive today had he just parked legally
0 likesthat man is lieing wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 likesRevelation 19 After these things I heard as it were the voice of much people in heaven, saying: Alleluia. Salvation, and glory, and power is to our Lord God.
0 likes2 For true and just are his judgments, who hath judged the great harlot which corrupted the earth with her fornication, and hath revenged the blood of his servants, at her hands.
3 And again they said: Alleluia. And her smoke ascendeth for ever and ever.
4 And the four and twenty ancients, and the four living creatures fell down and adored Lord God that sitteth upon the throne, saying: Amen; Alleluia.
5 And a voice came out from the throne, saying: Give praise to our Lord God, all ye his servants; and you that fear him, little and great.
6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of great thunders, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord Godd our God the Almighty hath reigned.
7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give glory to him; for the marriage of the Lord God Lamb is come, and his wife hath prepared herself.
8 And it is granted to her that she should clothe herself with fine linen, glittering and white. For the fine linen are the justifications of saints.
9 And he said to me: Write: Blessed are they that are called to the marriage supper of the Lord God Lamb. And he saith to me: These words of Lord God are true.
10 And I fell down before his feet, to adore him. And he saith to me: See thou do it not: I am thy fellow servant, and of thy brethren, who have the testimony of Jesus. Adore God. For the testimony of Lord God Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.
11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called faithful and true, and with justice doth he judge and fight.
12 And his eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many diadems, and he had a name written, which no man knoweth but himself.
13 And he was clothed with a garment sprinkled with blood; and his name is called, THE WORD OF LORD GOD.
14 And the armies that are in heaven followed him on white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
15 And out of his mouth proceedeth a sharp two edged sword; that with it he may strike the nations. And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness of the wrath of Lord God the Almighty.
16 And he hath on his garment, and on his thigh written: KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun, and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the birds that did fly through the midst of heaven: Come, gather yourselves together to the great supper of Lord God:
18 That you may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of tribunes, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all freemen and bondmen, and of little and of great.
19 And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war with him that sat upon the horse, and with his army.
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet, who wrought signs before him, wherewith he seduced them who received the character of the beast, and who adored his image. These two were cast alive into the pool of fire, burning with brimstone.
21 And the rest were slain by the sword of him that sitteth upon the horse, which proceedeth out of his mouth; and all the birds were filled with their flesh.
“On October 10, 2019, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit of 92 days for time served.He is imprisoned at Lancaster Correctional Institution, near Trenton, Florida, where he was attacked and reportedly wounded by another inmate on February 11, 2020.” Couldn’t find it in the comments so here ya go, great vid JCS
282 likesReplies (22)
Thank you!
7 likesHe got hit with a lock now he's at Columbia annex
9 likesOh ya Lancaster is a jungle lol
1 like@Nick Martin is that solitary confinement or something? I’m green when it comes to these types of things.
3 likes@Nick Martin what does it mean?
0 likesThere really aren't maximum security prisons in Florida besides union ci and Florida state prison. It just means he was transferred to a prison away from his assailant. But once you are attacked in this manner, or if you are in fear for your life, you get moved to protective custody. Fear would move you to a different unit on the same compound, where as a serious attack will call for a transfer to another compound and being placed in a pc (protective custody) unit.
2 likesBut yes protective custody will move you too the close management unit aka segregation. 23 hour a day lockdown.
2 likes@Nick Martin gotcha, thank you for the explanation. Ironic tho how his fear is what landed him into prison and then got him transferred essentially
9 likes@Jay Turn exactly! He's going to learn how to fight for real now 😆
10 likesThank you!!
0 likes@Jay Turn I felt a bit guilty for that thought.
0 likesThought: I bet he wish he had his gun.
I'm glad this guy is serving time
3 likesBecause this guy has been looking for people to shoot every day..he was not a cop why in hell
He was checking license plates for handicap plates or stickers.
Is not even his problem. He was just stocking people
@Your husband is my boyfriend I think so they’re calling it “protective custody”
0 likes20 years ? This guy is very ego ,annoying .Thank you for sharing this btw
1 like👍🏼🤣👍🏼
0 likes@Jay Turn simple push he was thrown to the fucking ground, i hope you get these simple pushes every day :) Maybe will knock some sense in to you.
1 likeGuess he doesn't win altercations without weapons, he is a coward.
4 likesI love you!
0 likes@MegaRagingBunny Imagine defending a murderer who had threatened 4 other people with his gun in similar situations prior to this one 🙃🙃🙃
3 likes@AlienInDisguise Imagine judging the person instead of looking at the situation itself. It's the same case with zimmerman where everyone just bitches about how much they hate him instead of looking at the actual self defense situation.
1 like@[Todd disliked that] Sure hope you stretched before that reach. This guy literally murdered someone and had threatened 4 people prior with his gun. Did we watch the same video? The situation was over once he pulled his gun. No one had to lose their life. If you’re defending him, you’re sick.
5 likesThanks for the memo my man!
0 likesnever relax
1 likeHe was in the wrong because the assailant backed away yet he still shot. But there clearly are eased circumstances. The black guy shouldn't have pushed him to the ground.
1 likeReplies (1)
Yes you are correct. This was the correct outcome of this case. This is one of the reasons why it is incredibly important to be trained and knowledgeable about the law in relation to firearms. I had to defend myself when my oldest son was a baby and in the heat of the moment you are very likely to make a wrong move if you are poorly trained which the suspect clearly was.
0 likesHe Sound's So Pathetic
0 likesSome people should never carry. When the gun goes on, your ego goes off. Good riddance on both ends. Dude was advancing pulling his pants up until he saw his life was ending
1 likeI know they’re not criminals, but it would be interesting to do a similar type of analysis video on the psychology of a high profile defense attorney when they know their clients are guilty. His attorney was shaky as hell lol
135 likesReplies (4)
So, in speaking to some of them...they are trying to make sure the govt does their job and proves the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt...it's not about if their client did it, it's about if the government can prove their client did it...
9 likes@C.A. Marg that is horrible decision
1 likeyeaaahh man that would be great. can't imagine they sleep at night
3 likesI imagine they sleep pretty well, considering they're protecting a defendant's right to be presumed innocent unless proven guilty. You know, that little idea that is the fundamental building block or American justice?
2 likesBruh got rocked
0 likesWhite dude murdered a black man over a parking spot, then was treated like a victim. Hope he gets what's coming to him
2 likesReplies (2)
He did, 20 years without early parole. Eligible for for release at age 67. He was also terribley beaten in prison in 2020. Happy ending for him.
1 like@Trumpty The Clown excellent (:
1 likeWhy is his defense attorney Trump though 42:20
0 likesI would be scared to if a large man shoved me to the ground
0 likes"neutralize, negative" this guy thinks hes a character in call of duty and the cops are there to give him a medal
1833 likesReplies (21)
@1 2 he was using technical terms that are actually used.
19 likesi don't think he play call of duty
1 likeIts a whole culture...breeding for centuries. Its got to stop. This is murder.
27 likes@1 2 call in air strikes?
1 like@Jhon Famo assaulting someone who's armed is a mistake.
8 likes@some dudeso is accosting strangers over public parking on multiple occasions . He knew his actions could provoke people which is why he carried a firearm. He said so himself in the video.
44 likesAlso im pretty sure the victim didn't know he was armed until after he pushed him away from his woman and kids. Hence why he backed away.
@some dude If an armed stranger is yelling at my wife for seemingly no reason, and my young children are in the car, I think I'd be justified to push him out of the way. Plus, this guy was WAITING for someone to "assault" him. He wanted to fire that weapon. He admits himself that he carried a firearm because he would do things like this all the time. Guys like this look for excuses to "be the hero".
37 likes@Blkeclipse L I don't think accosting is the right term, he was known to confront people parking in inappropriate places which on the one hand I can commend for the fact that I have had friends and family greatly inconvenienced by inconsiderate people taking the parking designated for those who need while on the other hand I don't think Michael should have been the "Parking Lot Vigilante" he was acting as. I think the prosecutions last statement was the most apt, he was right the brandish the weapon but not to discharge it. The man took it way to far by throwing Michael to the ground, that was over the top and my initial reaction if I were in that position would be that he wanted to seriously injure me. I don't think you can reasonably defend his actions by saying "he didn't know he was armed". And the only thing I could think of the whole time they debated the steps forward was that Michael likely had whiplash from being thrown to the ground thus impairing his perception of the situation.
6 likessome dude yeah it’s just totally normal to talk like that. I’m sure it has nothing to do with him larping as the armed protector of a food store, desperately waiting for that one moment in his life where he would finally be able to shoot someone.
12 likes@Squid Lounge : Accost: to approach and address (someone) boldly or aggressively. I'd say that's an adequate word to describe his actions .
9 likesHow is it that you can say Accost isn't the right term but in the same sentence you acknowledge that he was known to "Confront" people ? Confront: to meet (someone) face to face with hostile or argumentative intent.
I am a legal gun owner with a CWP. People like him are the reason why things that go without saying has to be taught in course. Such as carrying a firearm does not give you the clearance to needlessly insert yourself into a situation that may force you to have to use your weapon much less become a provocateur to incite altercation.
He has confirmed that he had no hand to hand combat skills and that he's never been in a fight a day in his life. If he wasn't carrying - he wouldn't have been so bold as to "confront" strangers over public parking. Thus making him more inclined to use a deadly weapon. Which means he knew exactly what he was doing and what could come of it in the event someone challenged his self appointed authority . In short if you can't fight for shit - don't go around starting it . A gun doesn't give you the right to be billy badass - It comes with serious responsibilities and serious consequences.
How you could commend such nonsense is beyond me . From a legal standpoint - Mr. McGlockton shouldn't have pushed him. However I can understand why he did and at the end of the day it made no difference when the judge handed down Drejka's sentencing . When a man sees a random stranger shouting at his woman in the presence of his children it's completely plausible that he will perceive him as a threat and no one knows how a man will react when he thinks you're threatening his family.
And the united states of america is the only place on earth that gives these people the right to carry a fucking gun at all times.
4 likesIf he had done it in 2020...
0 likes@Blkeclipse L I can appreciate the thought process behind what you are saying all except for the last paragraph. Drejka was criticized for not making a verbal warning before firing and yet McGlockton isn't, if McGlockton had called out for instance before causing a violent situation I can't say for certain things would have gone different but I believe it would be more likely. At the end of the day I can not agree with Drejka firing the weapon, but I cannot agree with saying he needlessly accosted people. From the video you can see he didn't take an aggressive stance when speaking to the woman and was said to be a very calm man be people who knew him. No one likes being corrected, which is why I really have to assume the reports of him "accosting" other drivers is exaggerated. I think Drejka was demonized far more than was earned and the sentence they are after is extreme. But I do think it is a good teachable story for people who would like to carry a weapon, fire only when you think a life is at risk if you don't.
0 likes@Allison If an armed stranger is yelling at someone, and you assault him, you've fucked up. Because this is what could happen.
1 likeThere's a word that people need to learn: "deescalation." No one seems capable of it any more, and so we see people getting killed over incredibly petty matters because people appear to feel obliged to take things a step up and make matters worse rather than try to calm people down.
This is foolish, dangerous behavior that needs to stop. If someone is yelling, you need to try to calm them down. Attacking them is the very definition of escalation. Stop it.
@Johnny sack Wouldn't have even made local headlines since he wasn't a police officer. Doesn't fit their narratives.
0 likes@some dude he is using jargon which is usually done to signal your membership in a group. Calling a stipulation a stip is gonna signal to people that you are a lawyer or some sort of legal professional. If you are actually just a dude who watches lots of legal dramas then you're just a dork.
2 likesSame goes with him and his use of militaryaw enforcement jargon.
@some dude he never saw his holster side. no way he could have known he was armed before he pushed him
3 likesJhon Famo yes, what happened to honor? You’re never supposed to shoot an unarmed man! He could have just called the police if it bothered his so badly that they were in a handicapped space. It’s not his job to enforce the law.
2 likesIt’s white knighting. Just having a gun makes people think they are some kind of vigilante, above the law, despite no training. It’s the “good guy with the gun mentality” and it’s dangerous
2 likes@Allison
0 likesThere's a world of difference between treating someone with kid gloves and shoving them to the ground. McGlockton could've yelled "hey, get the fuck away from my wife and kids, you mall cop wannabe son of a bitch motherfucker" and that would be been an ultimately better option than what he did. Even the prosecutor stated an argument could be made that Drejka had every right to pull his gun at that moment. This doesn't excuse shooting McGlockton once he had clearly started to back up, obviously.
There needs to be better training when it comes to firearms. I believe Drejka genuinely thought he was in the right. That's why he was so forthcoming with the police, and why he failed to speak with an attorney first. There's a great deal of responsibility when it comes to owning a firearm, and Drejka clearly failed to display any responsibility here.
Kinda yeah. He screwed up.
0 likesI feel so sorry for that sweet baby, he had to see his dad drop dead in front of him. The audacity of this man to play victim when he started it is astounding.
295 likesReplies (6)
It is extremely sad. The guy definitely did not deserve to die. Unfortunately, this sad tale reinforces something I believe in: Always think twice before laying your hands on people on the street. You can be morally in the right. But you can never tell if someone is a crazy with a gun.
16 likesA scumbag parks in a handicapped zone. Another scumbag takes issue with it being wrong and/or illegal and mouths off to the lady in the car. Mr. Outraged runs up and physically accosts Drejka.
And, in this case, the guy attacked pulled out a gun and killed him. Doesn't matter what the right and wrong was when you're dead.
One minor violence can lead to bigger violence.
3 likes@Sherab Thomey wow so deep and thought provoking......
10 likes@Patrick Baklava lmao stop 💀
3 likesBut it’s HIS store smh this guy was pissing me off.
0 likesHorrible!
0 likesHis use of terms like "neutralize" and that one about force that I can't remember is so hilarious, like he thinks he's speaking the cop's language
654 likesReplies (17)
He does it to dehumanize his victim. “Neutralize” in place of murder. “Threat” instead of anything to say he killed another man. Considering how calm he is talking about ending someone’s life over a handicap spot shows how effective it was for him. It’s honestly crazy how much time he has to discern that this man is no longer a threat. Considering how much he pats himself on the back for beings so “firearm trained”
79 likesYa, seems like he was playing like he was a cop.
22 likesHe calls his gun a "force multiplier" and the cops mock him for it
62 likesCringeworthy
9 likes"force multiplier"
17 likesBro played cod too much
10 likesWas thinking the exact same thing. "Holstered my weapon" "altercation" "21 foot rule" he's trying to gain the respect of the police by using their terminology. The guy watches too many cop shows...
13 likesA cop wouldn't say the word neutralize.This guy saw too many movies.
2 likesHes the kind of guy who wanted join the military but was denied. Wannabe Veteran.
7 likes“Negative sir”
3 likes“I can’t fight that’s why I need a force multiplier”
5 likes@Caleb Ale Drejka also says "expired" instead of "died".
4 likesCop language or military language. He sounds like someone who has delusions of being in some kind of armed organisation. He reminds me a bit of that Jeremy Whateverhisnameis who is a serial police impersonator.
5 likes@David de Witt
4 likes@Liesbeth Klap That's the one
3 likes“force multiplier” as a weapon 💀
1 likeFORCE MULTIPLIER
0 likesThis guy was just looking for a fight. There was absolutely no justification for this shooting. So they were illegally parked, the video says that Drejka was also illegally parked. Man, the confrontation over a handicap placard is just stupid. I’m glad he got 20 years for this. That man should have never lost his life over something so trivial.
133 likesReplies (5)
Thx for the spoiler
0 likes@Da Boy I know for a fact you didn’t just say that
6 likes@Da Boy I- A man died, you know, I dont think you should be upset you got spoiled.
4 likes@Da Boy Why go down to the comment section before watching the video?
3 likesYou mean the black guy who went physical for no reason?
1 likeHe was just looking for an excuse to use his pistol. Just because someone pushes you and takes several steps back doesn’t mean they deserve to die.
282 likesReplies (37)
I agree. However, the other lesson to learn here is that you shouldn't assault people who are just talking.
11 likes@Jarrad Pechie they weren't just talking, a strange man was yelling at his wife and kids and he reacted to protect them
24 likes@gay renaissance ok, so he was yelling. So what? Raising your voice isn't assault and it doesn't warrant physical violence.
18 likes@Jarrad Pechie being pushed after inciting an argument doesn't warrant premeditated murder
29 likesIf you have someone at gun point and then after a few seconds decide to shoot that's a sign you're a psychopath.
@vocal procrastinating yeah I never once implied it was justified. But it does go to show that you'd be better off taking a second to make sure it's worthwhile before you assault someone for yelling. Right or wrong between either of them, that guy wound up shot. There were several ways either party could have de-escalated that situation and they both failed at every opportunity.
7 likesAlso, you apparently don't understand what premeditated means.
@Jarrad Pechie I think it’s pretty obvious that he shouldn’t have pushed the guy, but i think we all agree it’s very obvious the guy took it to a whole new level of escalation by pulling out a gun.
9 likes@Jarrad Pechie yeah you should always think twice before getting physical with a stranger because you don't know if they have a weapon.
4 likes@Yuki Amano I did watch the video. Regardless of his history, the husband had no indication that he was going to do anything other than just gripe.
3 likes@vocal procrastinating premeditated means planned my guy
3 likes@Jarrad Pechie It's weird bc your same logic applies to the murderer. You should never approach strangers and yell/ become aggressive with them bc you don't know if they will become violent. That's the problem with vigilantes. Seeing someone commit a minor traffic violation shouldn't lead to you confronting and screaming at a random stranger. Had he not done two lives and two families would have been saved.
2 likes@UltimateRiceWater Challenge I have a hard time calling someone who bitches somebody out for parking in a handicap spot a "vigilante." Any of that aside, he was totally in the wrong for shooting a retreating man and the jury reflected that. It's already a non-variable that doesn't need highlighting. My comment was based on the fact that shoving someone to the ground over a verbal confrontation might just end your life, which I don't think is being examined enough. Like it or not, Marquis was the initial aggressor in this situation. People have public disagreements with strangers all the time. It doesn't give you license to go around shoving people.
2 likes@Jarrad Pechie well, then I supposed that's where I have to leave the conversation. You think of it as mere “bitching” to me it was a sign of aggression. And with any sign of aggression, you never know if the other guy will take it to a ten. Ppl violate minor traffic laws all the time it doesn't mean you get to display signs of aggression towards them.
2 likes@Jarrad Pechie as a final note, we are actually making the same point. I would just like you to apply that same logic to the gunman. Nonphysical aggression is well studied in the social psychology of mammals. Verbal aggression is one of the most common types in most mammals. Imagine for a moment a pit bull is in front of you growling and barking, you would take that as a sign of aggression. You might believe he is ready to attack you. Perhaps you might even attempt to strike it as a response or some other way to chase it away...
2 likes@UltimateRiceWater Challenge pitbulls don't understand complex ideas or emotions that humans can employ to resolve conflict. Not an apt comparison. All Marquis had to do is walk up and say "Whoa what's the problem here man?" and I guarantee Drejka would have tucked tail and ran or at least calmed his tone. Instead he immediately resorted to physical violence and got killed. It's too bad that we can't ask him if it was worth it.
0 likes@Jarrad Pechie animals tend to respond instinctually when meeting aggression. Even humans. Do you deny that yelling is a sign of aggression? (a quick google search will show that psychologists say it is). If not, then based on your logic above, the shooter was the initial aggressor and thus began the unnecessary cycle of aggression. No, but we can ask the gunman, I bet he wishes he’d never become aggressive with that woman
1 like@UltimateRiceWater Challenge so you're saying that humans are no better than animals with regard to the ability to reason? Yelling may be an aggressive act, but even in the eyes of the law it doesn't by itself present a clear and present danger for which you're authorized to assault someone.
0 likes@Jarrad Pechie there are millions of cases that prove humans reason terribly pretty often 😂 this case is one of them.
0 likesWe weren't talking about the law though, were we? The law was already used to decide the case. The murderer was convicted. We were talking about your logic, your argument. And you have just admitted that the victim was not the initial aggressor. All the other acts were a result of that initial aggression. Therefore the surest way to avoid this all would have been for the murderer to not have acted aggressively in the first place.
@UltimateRiceWater Challenge my logic is based on the law. If you feel any differently, I encourage you to start shoving anyone who raises their voice and see hiw that works out for you.
1 like@Jarrad Pechie and that kids is how you use someone’s logic against them 😂😂
0 likes@UltimateRiceWater Challenge lol gloat all you want. Your argument is based on humans lacking the ability to reason and therefore somehow excusing them from culpability. It's absurd and flimsy.
1 like@UltimateRiceWater Challenge and let's be real clear here: your argument is basically "talk shit get hit," which is not exactly surprising to me. Wonder where you'd land if there was a little bit of role reversal in this situation.
0 likes@Jarrad Pechie wrong. My argument and your argument are one and the same. Being aggressive is stupid and should be avoided, as it leads to situations like this. We agree. You are just so biased that even though you admit the murderer was the initial aggressor you refuse to apply the logic to him as well.
0 likes@UltimateRiceWater Challenge I didn't ever say he was the initial aggressor. Initializing a disagreement isn't in and of itself aggressive, and it in no way justifies assault. If Drejka hadn't have shot his attacker, he could have easily pressed charges on him.
0 likes@Jarrad Pechie you admitted that yelling was an act of aggression. Therefore making the shooter the initial aggressor. It's amusing watching you tiptoe around what you want to say. Why would you believe I'm okay with “Talk shit get hit?”. After I've blatantly said I think aggressive actions led to other aggressive acts, after I've said I found it stupid to do so. What a curious assumption 🤔
0 likes@UltimateRiceWater Challenge actually the initial act of aggression was the woman parking in a handicap spot. In cases where the law is broken and there is no material victim, the state is held as the victim, therefore she committed an act of aggression against the state. Regardless, Marquis was the initiator of violence. A needless escalation of the situation that cost him his life because he was unable to control himself. Sad.
0 likes@Jarrad Pechie by no definition of the word aggression does that make any sense. No human would take that as a sign of aggression. Which is a “readiness to attack or confront” according to modern dictionaries 😂😂 you really are terrible at this. A person can commit a crime against the State, never in U.S history has any lawyer or judge said “This person committed aggression against the State” 😂😂😂Nice job ignoring my other question. Why you you think that about me ?. Let's leave it here buddy ✌️🏽
0 likes@UltimateRiceWater Challenge I know you're desperate to illustrate that your boy did no wrong. We all know why, it's all good.
0 likes@Jarrad Pechie if you weren't blinded by your own bias you would realize I have agreed with you that aggression leads to escalation. The shooter aggressively yelled. His push led to the escalation of aggression, the shot. Ahh he wasn't a boy Jarrad, he was man.
1 like@UltimateRiceWater Challenge you are incapable of admitting that Marquis was in the wrong for pushing him. Yelling at someone- and we don't even know if he was yelling- isn't a crime, and responding to it with physical violence IS a crime. This nonsense tale that you're trying to spin of the man being outside of the control of his faculties and therefore excused of his role is fantasy. Even the prosecutor said that Drejka was justified in DRAWING his gun, which an intelligent person would only be to conclude would be because he was unexpectedly attacked for no good reason. Drejka did nothing illegal or warranting of physical violence until he pulled the trigger.
0 likes@Jarrad Pechie sigh. I have already admitted all the acts of aggression led to greater acts. This is circular and ridiculous.
1 like@Rob Oc right?
0 likes@Jarrad Pechie and yet you could not form a a better argument. Let it go friend.
0 likes@UltimateRiceWater Challenge I have let it go. I wasn't replying to you. I'm not going to bother with someone who thinks repeating the same nonsense over and over means they've won.
0 likes@UltimateRiceWater Challenge Your arguments are weak tbh. The blatant bias your showing(and we all know why) is incredible. Words aren't violence no matter how you spin it. Shouting, loud speaking etc none of it's violence. I live in a country that would call out the mother's incredible ignorance and arrogance. That's the first mistake in this story. I can already tell you won't look at this objectively purely because of skin color. The first, FIRST...act of violence was by the father. You don't get to put your hands on someone because of words. Yes, to some extend I disagree with the subsequent response but let's not get it twisted who started and escalated the situation.
1 likeMaybe stick to your rice a Roni hair tutorials
@Jarrad Pechie She's obviously obsessed and bias to some extend. You were talking to me but she felt the need to respond. She seems emotionally invested too. Sad.
1 like@Jarrad Pechie You are correct.
0 likes@EPIC Films 4 life Premeditated in a legal sense could mean you took 2 seconds to decide to kill someone.
0 likesHe is so proud of what he did. Manslaughter is ridiculous! The victim retreated and he murdered the man after being pushed. The guy should not have pushed him, but he didn't deserve to die behind it.
42 likesReplies (3)
Murder charges are a lot harder to prove because they’d have to prove premeditation. He still got 20 years and manslaughter charges were a slam dunk case vs murder charges.
4 likes@Alex Burke plus he was already nearing 50 at the time of the shooting. Not sure how much time he’s got left after he gets out
1 like@Greigames I think the maximum sentence is 30 years so he’d be 80+
0 likesI would love to see a video of the most not guilty appearing suspect in an interrogation that was ultimately guilty
12 likesAt 29:32 the police officer asks this murderer, "What were his (the victim's) hands doing?" And "Were you able to see them, were you able to see the guy's hands?" The lying murderer responds, "I have no clue." While simultaneously repeating the exact hand gesture that his victim demonstrated before he gunned him down in cold blooded first degree MUR-ER-DER .
76 likesAnd at 39:30, just after the murderer cries about missing his dogs (not about him being the only reason his victim's children will NEVER see their father again) the interviewer asks this murderer if there was anything that he would change. And the cold blooded murderer actually said no!!!!!!
Replies (5)
what is a mur-er-der
5 likesMurder.
3 likes@ryan izak maree Do you really need someone to spell it out for you?
0 likes@Looking 4 Things I think it was called a joke, they spelled murderer wrong. Ryan jokingly asked what a Murerder is. Get over yourself will you? Thanks.
1 like@Santa Claus Im not the one being nit picky about how to spell murderer. What shall I get over Santa? lol
2 likesYou got to respect the officer he was leading him to at least say “he was in fear for his life” and it never crossed this idiots mind! He was looking for trouble and trouble he found! Blessings for the family that’s suffering 🙏and the victimMarquise 😇 All because some loser wanted to play cowboi🤠💥💥..Truly sad, the whole situation, thank god Mr Drejka 🗣 talked himself into jail that’s the best part 😂😂of the whole unfortunate day…
4 likesAs a european, I just started to grasp the full effect of american gun laws after binge watching JCS vids. I could not walk the streets peacefully, when every idiot could possibly carry a gun on him.
29 likesReplies (2)
As a Canadian, it's honestly insane to me.
2 likesLand of the Free (to own a gun XD)
0 likesThese cases are invaluable to concealed weapons carriers. Some people like to talk tough about how they handle themselves in rough neighborhoods, but everyone needs to know the weapon in the last resort, not the initial response.
7 likesHint: Never talk to the police, even if you’re innocent. Always lawyer up immediately!
34 likesReplies (2)
You can talk to the police and just answer every question with "I'm not sure." There was one murder case where this wife of a killer does was say "I'm not sure." And the detectives would get frustrated and say "It's a yes or no question" And she replies with "I'm not sure." LOL The detectives were trying to figure out if she help her husband cover his crime so they can charge her. But because all she says is "I'm not sure." they can't pin her on anything. LOL She did this without any lawyer.
0 likes@Walden dont do that, dont say anything without a lawyer present. If they offer water say nothing and dont drink it. If they ask how the weather is say nothing. Say nothing. Say absolutely nothing except "I want a/my lawyer."
1 likeJust seeing him wait over 5 seconds after pulling his gun to shoot shows he wasn’t in fear of his life. He thinks he’s a vigilante but In reality he’s a villain
1 likeThis man had many other options then to shoot. Pulling out that gun was not where he was in the wrong, it was firing the gun at the man that was the problem. He should have pulled it out and warned the man that if he got any closer he would fire or he should fire a warning shot (he should have a blank on the first round that way no one else gets severely hurt if he messes up the warning shot) He had so many other options and I think especially if he stated that he didn't even fear for his life he should have not shot that man.
2 likesThis guy was looking for trouble the minute he pulled in the lot. Circling the woman’s car looking for a handicap sticker so that he could start some shit. And look what It got you buddy!! You have/had NO right to take a life over a scraped elbow!
15 likesIt's really interesting to see him complain about his arms, when they leave - he isn't really showing any signs of discomfort or soreness but soon as an officer comes back in, "left hand, left hand" and acts like he is in complete discomfort, again.
7 likesTo de-escalate a problem that can get physical he could’ve apologize (regardless of what they were doing,he was in no business to enforce a parking issue) mind his own business and go upon the rest of his day. But his idea of de-escalating a problem he created is to k1ll the man?? That was someone’s child,that was someone parent (who also witnessed it all)..the complete disregard of life is insane,all over a parking spot.Yeah I see people that use those spots to wait on someone,or hop out looking completely capable but it ain’t my business..people have disabilities that aren’t visible and they can very well have an issue I do not see so I do not bother them and keep to myself. This guy thought he could use the stand your ground law as excuse to start crap with people and not receive the consequences.
2 likesThat sheriff gave Drejka the shovel and Drejka dug a grave so goddamn deep. The epitaph would read, "He never said a word."
1 likeThe sheriff handled this beautifully. He set up Drejka time and time again to essentially confess to murdering someone aaaaaand Drejka was none the wiser.
His reaction when told the victim was dead speaks for itself. zero remorse.
2 likesReplies (2)
Well, it followed the line that what he said.. he did what he had to do. So it was on the the deceased's his own death (according to his point of view)
1 likeWhat I am trying to show is had he shown remorse it would have been detrimental to his argument.
1 likeHes a bully. He lacks control and authority so instead he takes it out on strangers.
60 likesHe saw a woman alone with kids in the parking lot. She was the perfect victim to bully. So that's what he did.
Replies (9)
"Hes a bully. He lacks control and authority"
3 likesAre you describing people who push others to the ground because they can't control their temper?
@*ᴥ* obvious bait
5 likesWell they guy is a weirdo but they did park on a handicap spot.
1 like@StoutJudas guess what? families with young kids do this stuff sometimes. it's not bullying. it's called.. tired.. taking a short cut.. . not right .. but hardly crime of the century
2 likes@Eva-Imogene Wharehoka Friend Eva. I didn't call it a "Crime of the century" nor was it justified gunning down the guy with the anger issues. I just find those people extremely annoying.
0 likes@StoutJudas nobody cares if you find them extremely annoying. i just hope you realise that you’re infact sitting here trying to justify this man shooting a father.
0 likes@G. Marie I don't justify it. He belongs in prison.
0 likes@StoutJudas then why are you sitting here acting like you are? because absolutely nobody cares that you think its «extremely annoying» that people who arent handicapped parks in the handicap spot, because it really had nothing to do with this
0 likes@G. Marie You seem to care though. Otherwise you wouldn't have responded...
0 likesOn October 10, 2019, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit of 92 days for time served
4 likesIn the interview at end of video the shooter is to dimwitted to realize he is being setup when interviewer ask him if there was anything about that day he could change what would it be? He's focusing on the specific mechanics of the incident from the point of view you can't change what has already happened rather than if you had the whole incident to do over. It is stated that he had 4 previous altercations with strangers in the past 18 months and did not have the capacity, such as fist fighting, to defend himself. It does lead one to believe when he holsters that Glock 40 he also holsters an attitude with it. None of this negates the fact that a younger, stronger and physically bigger individual initiated a physical confrontation violently shoving him to the ground. His biggest mistake was not (1.) requesting to go to the hospital to document injury to arm, (2.) not speaking to police until he obtained an attorney and(3.) waiting 72 hours, as police all across the country do after a police involved shooting, before speaking with the police.
0 likesWhen you are in a police interrogation room the police are not your friends no matter. How friendly they may seem.
the amount of "negative" he said in the whole conversation is enough to ionize the air and purify the whole room.
2 likesLesson to be learned here: don’t put hands on someone (you might get shot) and don’t shoot someone because of a confrontation/assault unless you’re in imminent danger.
7 likesthis is absolutely heart breaking
0 likesThis must be the quintessential video interview for the saying "Get a lawyer and don't talk to the cops".
1 likeLess than two minutes into this, Drejka is a killer, pure and simple.
1 likePeople can make all the JCS inspired videos they want, and I like a lot of them, but nothing compares to the real deal JCS.
1 likeBest channel out there. Pure awesomeness content
1 likeWhat kind of psychological test do you have to go thru to get a permit to carry a gun in the US?
0 likesSeems like none by the look of the interview of this video.
20 years in prison for stealing someones life away isnt fair at all
1 likeThe scary thing is that Michael seemed to be sure he will get away with that. Hell, he might even truly believed that. The second scary thing is, that, without a CCTV, he possibly would have been right with that assumption.
335 likesReplies (12)
i noticed that he believed he was gonna be let free too, made me wonder why he was so confident!
14 likesYou get the impression this guy carries his gun around waiting for a chance to kill someone.
37 likes@Meep Meep that's what I thought immediately after seeing him purposely pick a fight over a parking spot. he probably thought he could cry self defense when he shot and killed the guy when he provoked him into pushing or hitting him. what a despicable human being this guy is...
14 likes@Amber D. kinda grateful my country doesn't allowed to have a gun
7 likes@Maxso hey nice bait! do you fish a lot? lol
6 likesThe 3rd scary thing is how indifferent he acts when given the news that he's just uhhh idk TAKEN SOMEONES LIFE!! I'd hope that any sane person (as I would be personally) would be beside themselves learning this if they truly were simply trying to defend themselves...but that was never Michael's intention, all along he simply wanted to hurt, kill and get revenge. Sick!
5 likes@Hanna Lester You haven't been around men, have you, especially some who are into guns. It's a different relationship with death.
0 likesDo you blame him for thinking he’d get away with it? The police murder unarmed black men with impunity all the time. He probably thought they’d deputize him on the spot.
1 like@Meep Meep yep. One of those lunatics who fantasize about being in a situation where they can use justifiable homicide as a defense. George Zimmerman Jr.
0 likesThe cops tried to let him get away with it. The local sheriff declared he couldn't be jailed because of stand-your-ground laws in a public press conference. It's only when the district attorney decided to charge the man with manslaughter that he got taken off the streets.
1 likenot really, the girlfriend was a direct witness and there were many other witnesses at the scene
0 likesHe didn't think he would get away with anything, because he doesn't think he committed a crime.
0 likesI think my favorite and only think I like about cops is that they pretend to care about people personal life “ awww that’s dope” 😂😂
0 likesHappened right down the street from me. Been to Circle A dozens of times.
0 likesNo reason to go over board .this guy is deluded .so he feels his actions are normal to do . This is why everyone shouldn't have access to fire arms
1 likeThat's what happens when u allow every clown that wants a gun to own and carry one in public
2 likesThey were both in the wrong, the shot guy started the physical damage, and the shooter took it too long, it could have stayed as a verbal fight.
1 likeReplies (1)
No, it couldnt have stayed a verbal fight, because drejka wouldve 10% pulled his gun no MATTER what marquice did or said, he was literally KNOWN for doing that.
0 likesonce he pulled the gun, and had the target zero'd in...there was no reason to pull the trigger. you HAVE TO respect the power you possess in your hands. you have the situation completely deescalated...BACK AWAY AND CALL 911 UNLESS THERE IS ANOTHER GUN BEING DRAWN!!!!!!!!!!
1 likeI've yet to see one of these where the forensic lady ISNT a smoke show...
2 likesThis broke a part of my heart that will Never UnBreak .
0 likesLol the clown is taking notes in his trial like he is at a university lecture. Hahah
3 likeswhy did the detective ask if his arm was broken when he was brought in? was that just a “wanna seem friendly” or was he just genuinely nice or is there a legal reason they have to check his health?
0 likesReplies (1)
It's probly to see if it's justified,a bit atleast.
0 likesHe say's "He hit me from behind." despite being shoved from the front.
3 likesJust imagine that guys like this are given a badge and a gun everyday.
2 likes20 years for: cold-blooded killing of an unarmed young father defending his family who had started backing away once this guy pulled a gun on him was an insult and unjustifiable. This guy then overplayed his right hand injury, lied that Markeis McGlockton was advancing towards him and that was why he shot him. The video clearly showed Markeis backing away.
0 likesI don't care about any idiot who might question my personal opinion, but I've wondered so many times about what the outcome would've been had the roles been reversed and it was Markeis who had shot and killed this man in the same manner. I bet the sentence would've been much heavier, and the treatment by the cops would've been so much different from the car park, through these interviews to the Court as we have seen them treat this guy.
Incidentally, when this self-appointed car park attendant approached Britani Jacobs's car, he himself was parked illegally.
Replies (1)
Easily could have been charged with 1st degree and given life without parole.
0 likesI think he was embarrassed and angry at being pushed so he shot him, not justifiable at all.
2 likesThis guy is the result you get when sit on a computer all day and think you “operate”. Jesus he’s cringe
1 likeAmazing interview by the sheriff. I was not expecting much to be honest.
0 likesHe didn't have to shoot him. He could've threatened him with the gun until he left him alone, or he could have shot him in the foot to keep him away. He deserve 20 years in prison this was not out of self defense this is murder!
1 likeReplies (1)
foot has veins... bad idea
0 likesaiming with a gun isn't easy on such a small target which would make him shoot the leg.. a problem even worse than the first one
Man these cops actually gave this guy many chances to help his own case….he’s not very bright
0 likes"I carry a gun so I might as well just go out and start arguments with everybody"
2 likes- This guy probably
"Never been a fighter" seals it for me
1 like4:10 that handshake went as smoothly as the confrontation Michael was in.
0 likesTotally avoidable situation by all 3 involved
0 likesEmboldened by the Zimmerman verdict.
2 likesHe ran into trouble when “his store” had his derrière on camera.Otherwise he walks in Florida, regardless of his truly self damning statements.
Never forget Trayvon.
Replies (1)
Trayvon got what was coming to him after beating a man. Watch zimmermans trial. This is not the same situation at all.
0 likesWith a defence and defence lawyer that bad he should have just pleaded guilty
0 likesin the first 4 minutes, "just scraped up." so mild bruises and scrapes make it alright to kill a man? bro really dug his own grave💀
0 likes"Shoot just the once, no reason to go overboard" yeah right, you really took a step back and recollected yourself SMH and then they say have a tendency to get hysterical!
0 likesWhat a pansy! (not the p word i wanted to use) He strikes me as the kind of person that's been itching for ANY reason to use the gun on someone.
2 likesWow they really took 20 mins to get to someone with a gunshot wound?!
0 likesWe should teach gun safety and legal use in schools
0 likesIf you can sit there on the ground for a couple seconds, slowly pull up your shirt to grab your gun, and then point the gun for 2 seconds before finally firing while the “threat” stands three feet away from you backing up. It’s pretty safe to assume they’re not an immediate threat anymore and were clearly just pissed off you were screaming at their wife. After the push, I can honestly bet nothing worse was going to happen had the man not pulled out his gun instantly.
0 likesI think Drejka's lawyer knew that Drejka was probably gonna be convicted.
1 likeAnd Im saying that because his whole defense was "dont believe the video because its standard definition" and "Drejka is the real victim lol trust me"
Replies (1)
LOL yup. Imagine the lawyer saying "You can't convict someone on 720p quality, it's has to be above 1080p HD."
0 likesThis Guy F….d up his Life for a Parking Spot.
8 likes25:26 In a way, they're giving him plenty of opportunities to try and lie about what they could have said
2 likesThough, I think his tears when his dogs are brought up, are actually of compassion, he is a racist. You don't need to express "green eggs and ham" if your comfortable when it comes to black people. You just say "you're not racist", period!
0 likeswhy does this guy remind me of my "step dad" ofc I wouldn't imagine this happening but yeah
0 likesJustice SERVED!
0 likesJust watched video may change depending on audio but i say guilty he shot after the man was away you should war first there was no direct threat
0 likes50:19 "But could he have killed him?!"
1 likeDeath Stare You're damn right I could have."
This guy is the epitome of a Gravy SEAL
1 likenow imagine the scenario if gun wasn't so easily accessible to the general population.........they would both survive maybe with bruises and maybe broken ribs if they got into a big fight............but they would be alive.
1 likeHe is the type of guy to direct foot traffic at a grocery store bc he open carries.
0 likesI have a disabled parking placard. When you get one, you get a paper with helpful info. It states that your physical status is between you and the police. You are only obligated to produce the placard when a police officer asks for it. Because of all that, it really pisses me off when people try to police the disabled parking spaces. If you must cause a problem for someone parked in a disabled space, call the police. Let them deal with it.
49 likesReplies (5)
The man would've attacked the police and the same thing would of happened. In both scenarios it was a justified shooting.
2 likesFind Me there’s absolutely no reason to think he would’ve attacked a cop. This guy was arguing with the man’s wife, he was concerned for his wife and family’s safety. It would’ve been a very different scene if he emerged from the store to see his wife calmly talking to a cop,
3 likesit's against the law to ask WHY someone is disabled, if you have the legally required materials, they are required by law to leave you alone... learn your rights
2 likes@FolkPunk MusicJunkie you ever spoken to a cop who is having a bad day/is just in a shitty mood? you have too much faith in police
0 likes@FolkPunk MusicJunkie also, what if it was an off-duty cop? he would have gotten off
0 likesHe really though he did something 🤣
0 likesOk, very european statement: this is why i feel americas laws about guns are FUCKED UP!
13 likesSomething tells me that if he had no gun, he would have never confronted anyone. He's a little Bish.
1 likeHe forgot his arm was injured pretty quickly.
0 likesI wonder why was he arrested 25 days after instead of on the spot after interrogation? I mean the cctv footage was so clear.
0 likesJustice served
1 likeThis lawyer for Drejka is DAF! Nobody in their right mind would celebrate something like that, especially during a MURDER interview! Drekja is guilty AF! Bury him under the prison
0 likesHe did not shoot him in self defense, he shot him because he was mad he got shoved and fell over. This was murder.
1417 likesReplies (97)
I agree but he got the shit knocked out of him. It wasn't some simple shove and he happened to trip and fall over, ffs.
56 likes@Jack Burton Don't start confrontations if getting knocked over once makes you feel the need to kill in order to protect yourself. Guy was clearly looking for a reason to draw his gun, and any person mature enough to carry can see that.
244 likesedit: Oh, and he got charged. So clearly the justice system agrees with what I said.
@Grilled Leeks incorrect, he was charged with manslaughter, not murder
35 likes@DMitri Tompkins I just said he got charged lol. If you need to reach that hard maybe you dont really want it xD
84 likesLet's see how you react if you get knocked down and someone is standing over you. Situations like that easily devolve into getting your head beaten to a bloody pulp, kicks, punches to the face included, brain damage imminent. How about just don't assault anyone, period. Really not that hard.
56 likes@Intimacy He was not standing over him lol. Watch the video before you quote what happened xD
87 likes@DMitri Tompkins Yeah ok. Thanks for the input.
15 likes@Intimacy well play by play the dude wasn't walking towards him after the shove and then he pulled a gun again nothing too wrong at this point and then he points it at him for around 2 seconds before firing durring this time the man is clearly backing up and is clearly unarmed he just isn't a threat anymore
66 likes@Intimacy or maybe don’t think you’re the handicap parking hero and start harassing people for no reason? He had more than enough time to think and not shoot. The man froze when he saw the gun, he just wanted to shoot him. Probably waiting his entire life for the moment.
40 likes@Taco King Normally when people are hostile, they don’t tend to back off from whomever they confront after the hit. Usually after a shove anyone with malice intent would’ve continued their assault with a flurry of blows. He was not a threat at all, especially not with a gun in his face.
42 likes@Taco King Because a single gunshot would be all it would take to end his life, and both parties were clearly aware of that. If you whip out a pistol and your unarmed opponent backs up and you think they’re still a threat, you must be a paranoid nutjob. “Well for all I knew he was the fucking juggernaut and would tank my bullets as he magically accelerated forward.”
35 likes@Taco King to be a threat and a deadly threat are 2 different things and to pull a gun and fire it are 2 different things as well. If i get blindsided and fall to the ground i may pull out a gun and threat to shoot if the attacker continues but if he is unarmed and take 3.5 steps back i have the situation under controll and there is no threat. I become the threat. Now the right thing would be to talk and relax the situation, call the police, and press charges on the attscker with assault. Not kill him.
30 likes@Taco King okay yeah. After Markeis shoved Drejka first and took a few steps toward him after he did that. What did Makeis do after that?
3 likes@Taco King I’ll leave a time stamp for you to see the flaw in this as well. 2:26 the shooter is beginning to draw. Seeing him draw, the man who attacker is now backing away literally covering his body defensively. There is a 2 second period between shots. If this isn’t Billy Badass trying to look for an excuse to shoot somebody, then why didn’t he just stand up, keep the gun trained on him, and call the police? Instead of doing this, he aims after fumbling with the holster, registers where’s he’s aiming and actively fires a lethal shot. Again, why not just shoot the shoulder or leg if you are going to “fire for self defense”. He had plenty of time to do so.
9 likes@Taco King You’re still not recognizing the fact that if Markeis really wanted to hurt this guy, why would he give him anytime to reach for anything to begin with? Why not just beat Drejka to a pulp? Maybe it’s because he didn’t see this situation worth pursuing anymore altercation and decided to take a reprieve and wait for Drejka’s next move to decide what to do. Oh well, I guess the only proper thing to do when someone pushes you is too 𝑓𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚.
14 likes@Taco King “hyperviolent”. When he saw him draw the gun he backed up. If Drejka wasn’t an utter idiot he wouldn’t have started that confrontation in the first place. Sure, Markeis overreacted but are you telling me seriously with as much macho aura you radiate if someone was aggressively barrading your wife with little context you’d not do the same thing he did? Put yourself in Markeis’s shoes. His life wasn’t indanger he fell over lol. He himself said he just had some scrapes and bruises. Compared to what poor Markeis got, who wasn’t even armed btw, he seems to have got off fine. If anything, I’d say Drejka is hyperviolent here. He’s the one who turned a push to the ground into a lethal gunshot wound.
12 likes@Taco King Also, if someone were to be an actual threat to your life. You wouldn’t take 5 seconds to think before shooting them. You would immediately start dumping rounds into them. Drejka knew this guy wasn’t a threat, he just wanted to take this man’s life.
8 likes@𝑆𝑎𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠 this
2 likes@Jack Burton when he feel over the guy who shoved him didn’t jump on top of him or anything. Even when he pulled the gun for a solid 2-3 seconds he didn’t do anything. He killed him to protected his honor
4 likes@Christopher just watched the vid and the victim pulled up his pants before shoving then took two steps toward the shooter and was pulling up his pants again but started backing away when he saw a gun. The shooter definitely did not need to shoot but the victim was definitely planning on making his battery charge worth it by doing some more damage.
5 likesYeah no, it's not murder, it's manslaughter. It wasn't premediated and it's not like he pulled the gun on the guy in the middle of an argument, which would be 2nd degree.
2 likes@valko ki To be clear, he only backed away AFTER the gun was being drawn. The BEST case scenario here would be if the guy drew his gun, guy backed up and then he just kept it on him until police came and arrested the other guy. Pulling out the gun was 100% warranted because he DEFINITELY was about to get his ass beat, that much at least is not a lie. The problem is the shooting part.
2 likes@Ryan Scott sure I can agree that if the person didn't have the gun he might have gotten seriously injured I just don't agree he should have taken the shot and I feel very bad for the children I think best case scenario he pulls the gun he backs off and then calls the police and then the man who got shot instead gets arrested for assault or battery
3 likes@Taco King At this point you’re irredeemable.
8 likesI see so much bias in your language it’s unbelievable when you say shit like “𝑏𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 shoved“ and “𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑛 to the ground“. I have one final question for you, and I’ll be done with this entire argument. Do you think that the courts were correct in charging Drejka with manslaughter? Yes or No.
@Taco King because as soon as he saw the him reaching for the gun he starts backing up and then from about about 2:30 he is pointing his gun at him and then at 2:32 is when the shot is fired this whole time the man is backing up there isnt a reason to shoot, now let's say when he was pointing a gun at him he was still going towards him or maybe he was going for his pockets for a possible weapon then sure that's justified but he was clearly backing away and then he lied to detectives saying he was still approaching which means he knows he was in the wrong
6 likesNot to defend the idiot who took a man's life but that other guy had no need to push him with the force that he did. Don't be either of these people.
6 likes@Taco King that wasn't self defense lmfao. i'm not defending markeis because he's in the wrong too. nigga was asking to get shot if he was picking petty fights like that. but if you're the owner of a gun, you have a responsibility to use it, well, responsibly. you ever heard of the lines "with great power comes great responsibility"? drejka was not in a life or death situation, nor was markeis a threat to him. if anything drejka should've called the police so that things could've been handled from there. he's in the wrong for trying to take "justice" into his own hands. if you are in possession of a gun, you need to act like the bigger person in a situation. do not try to escalate things, and do not use a gun for petty things like being pushed down. hell, you can visibly see markeis walk away after pushing him down. he wasn't going to back to attack him (unless maybe if drejka retaliated) this is clearly not a case of self defense
7 likes@Leeroy Jenkins No doubt. I don’t think anyone is saying he was right in shoving him, but the escalation of the situation on Drejka’s part is completely unnecessary. Not the draw, but the shot.
2 likes@Taco King “Stepping towards him like he was going to stomp Drejka’s head in...”
6 likesThe over exaggeration is damn near poetry.
Are you Drejka himself?
You sure know how to 𝕖𝕤𝕔𝕒𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕖 𝕖𝕧𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕤.
Ya prob won’t shove anyone again...
0 likes@Taco King You still haven’t answered my question... Do you think the courts are correct in their decision?
2 likes@Taco King This man will not answer the question. 😂
6 likes@Sean Gallagher he killed him because he's a nut case and paranoid.
6 likes@Taco King All you gotta say is that you’re biased bro... 😌
8 likesI’m not defending Markhies on the shove.
I’m not attacking Drejka on the draw.
The shot is where everything takes a turn.
And in my eyes, and many others.
You are defending a manslaughter.
I’m not here for name calling or none of that. But, to sit here and defend some shit like this. That’s wild. 🤣
@Taco King say it
1 like@Grilled Leeks if i get knocked over im going to do whatever to keep me and my family safe, no matter the situation.
1 like@Taco King lets think about this rationally. Drejka has just started a confrontation with someone over a parking space. Markeis comes over and pushes him down. The adverbs you put before this, do not matter. He was pushed down. Markeis takes a step towards him. Looking at the entire scenario, either Drejka must have provoked Markeis’ wife to an extreme degree or Markeis was simply threatening Drejka. Drejka, then, pulls out a gun. Markeis takes a couple steps backwards and seems to flinch at Drejka pulling out the gun. Drejka fumbles with the gun for a second before firing at Markeis’ midsection. The moment Drejka had the gun out, he was no longer a victim. Markeis had stepped back trying to de-escalate the situation. What may have called for Drejka to fire, is if Markeis ran at Drejka after he pulled the gun. It would’ve only been justified then as he would’ve still been a threat.
5 likes@Intimacy agreed, only if its a civil situation. Civil as in its not a lynching or an immediate dangerous situation for one or the other.
0 likes@Ethan Irizarry You took the words right out of my mouth.
2 likes@Taco King dude the video explains how Drejka was in the wrong and the Father turns around his body, and gets shot.
2 likes@Ryan Scott agreed
1 like@Taco King Do you really think that living in a society where people park in handicapped spaces and people get pushed is worse than a society where people are shot over parking spaces. I have legitimately been pushed harder than Drejka playing flag football in middle school. I don't understand how you could possibly consider this situation self-defense.
5 likes@Taco King Did you watch the video? It was explained.
1 like@Taco King You can not shoot a person that is fleeing or withdrawing. Doesn't matter what he did beforehand.
3 likes@Taco King He did not launch him "like 5 feet" you called out someone for exaggerating how many seconds it was, so why are you doing the same? Also are you going to ignore that Drejka used the fact he had a firearm to make threats 3 times between 2012-2028?
2 likes@Taco King 36:55 literally talks about how he pulled the gun on other people…but okay. If I walked outside seeing my wife in an altercation with my kids in the car I wouldn’t know what to think. Like I don’t know what he is doing to them or saying to them.
4 likes@Taco King You have been using biased language: animal, hyperviolent/aggressive, brutally shoved, flung 5 feet, aggressively walked.
3 likesAfter the shove he wasn't running, he wasn't jumping on him, his body language didn't show he was mid attack; he slowly walked while pulling up his pants. Going from body language, he was either going to stand over him or wait and see his response.
@Taco King You do realize that is unacceptable, right? He stopped and began to move away from Drejka before the firearm was completely drawn and aimed.
5 likesThe things you're saying are not acceptable as self defense or proper gun usage. You should also understand that he was hit in the lower side, not around the center of the stomach or chest. The former further shows that he was turning and moving away when the shot was fired.
Please never buy a gun because you will most definitely shoot someone at the slightest bit of a physical altercation. Like your not going to give any warnings or see if they're backing off. That also reminds me that Drejka never gave any warning.
IF he had just stayed down he could've sue for being shoved and the guy probably end up few thousand dollar richer.
0 likesKeep your hands off people and you won't get shot.
2 likesI'm not here to protect the perpetrator, but if he had intended to kill the victim then he would not have shot just once but several times. He had enough time to shoot several times because he had him in his sights the whole time, even after the first shot. To me it looked like he wanted to push him back so he didn't shoot again. A murderer would either have fired a fatal shot directly or shot several times. I just wanted to say that because many here omit these facts completely.
2 likes@DMitri Tompkins chill
0 likesThey were both in the wrong but Drejka was more in the wrong, no intelligent lifeform would disagree with this statement.
3 likes@Tachibana nah its murder.
1 like@Taco King 2:28 - 2:32 Markeis is backing up. The situation was deescalating and Markeis was stepping away. He could have very easily just kept the gun trained, stood up and not shot. Why was killing him necessary? There is a 4 second window of opportunity before he shoots. The reason I’m stating this is murder not manslaughter is due to the fact he’s got 4 seconds of thought and time to simply put the weapon away. He would have been in the right here had he just called the police and told them to stay at the situation. Instead, he used that 4 seconds to kill a man over a handicap parking spot. A true American hero.
2 likes@Aidan Davis He wasn't shot over a parking space, he was shot for attacking someone and making that person feel like his life was in danger. Saying shot over a parking space is a lie, which you're using to manipulate the narrative and you know it. Be real. Also, getting pushed hard while playing football in middle school isn't an attack, it's part of a game. Are you saying these men were playing football so it's fine that the victim got pushed? They're two entirely different situations you're again trying to conflate.
1 like@Baby He wasn't 'doing' anything to them, he was just standing there. Bringing physicality into it makes your 'saying to them' comment less dumb so you used it to make it seem like the man was a threat for just talking to the attacker's wife. Attacking someone for saying something you don't like is clearly stupid, so you're trying to make out the man was doing something to them too, which he clearly wasn't, he was just standing there, so what's your argument?
0 likes@Grilled Leeks Telling someone not to park in a handicapped parking spot is not instigating conflict unless the person you're saying it to is extremely mentally unstable and thinks physical violence is an adequate response. In which case, physical violence is an adequate response to the physical violence, which is what happened. Don't turn things physical if you don't want to be physically injured as a result. Logic.
1 like@Puchowska anyone who actually watched the video can see how he instigated it, plus he has a history of it. If you dont know the details why are you typing?
1 likeAnyone arguing for the innocence of Drejka really just sounds racist lmao
2 likes@Puchowska I wasn’t making an argument I was talking about myself because I have anxiety and tend to over think…that’s why I said I wouldn’t know what to do. I know he shouldn’t have pushed him and the guy also shouldn’t have shot him.
0 likesManslaughter. Not murder.
0 likesHis first thought when pushed was probably absolute joy to the fact he’s able to kill someone followed by
1 like“why aren’t you moving towards me”
@Intimacy actually he could just point the gun at him without shooting him or at least at his leg to stop him but no shoot him at his chest very smart
1 like@Alexander Chess really he could have just avoid killing someone by pointing the gun because he started to go back but he shoot him if he is that scared shoot his leg
0 likes@MrJibakuwhat's the difference between these two?
0 likes@Intimacy He backed away once he drew his gun. There was no danger imminent. He did not have to shoot.
1 like@Intimacy yeah except that wasn’t what was happening. This wasn’t a case where the guy was on top of him the whole time or even a sense of desperation. He got knocked down, the guy was a good distance away. The guy just killed the other dude because he was embarrassed.
1 likeBased on?
0 likes@Taco King damn we got a real paranoid 2a nutjob here.. watch out bro they‘re coming for your guns smh
2 likes@Intimacy Imagine if he had pepper spray instead, the guy seeing it if he gave a warning would probably disengage and even if he didn't his life wouldn't be lost
0 likes"Got shoved and fell over", funny how you try to put blame for other man's aggressive actions on the victim of these actions, as if it's his fault that he fell to the ground from applied force. Your bias is seen miles away.
0 likes@Grilled Leeks so you're saying shoving someone over for being loud and annoying is ok? Where have you been growing up?
0 likes@Grilled Leeks lol "justice system" isn't some god or higher being, it's people who make decision and people are not always right.
0 likes@Grilled Leeks now you're trying to wiggle your way out with wordism, "I didn't say that exact thing so I'm still correct", pretty weak
0 likes@Jack Burton He put himself in that situation thinking he was a cop out enforcing the law. After he was shoved there was no follow up assault, he decided to commit murder out of anger. I think he felt brave because he had a gun and felt entitled to take it upon himself to enforce the law.
1 like@𝑆𝑎𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠 so I guess you defend an unprovoked physical assault?
0 likes@Intimacy Stop your non sense, this dude committed murder. First of all, he should not be acting like he is a law enforcement officer out enforcing the law and then get into a verbal argument with that woman. Second, the victim should not have pushed him but the victim did not follow up with kicks or punches. As a matter a fact once this murderer pulled out his weapon the victim actually backs away, it's on video in case you didn't see. He should of called the cops but this turd was already predisposed to this type of behavior.
1 like@FlymanMS I literally said that Markheis shouldn’t have shoved him to begin with... I just don’t think a push warrants a manslaughter.
1 likeNo, he was assaulted and outnumbered by people who were clearly violent and possibly armed. The illegal handicapped parking attacker did not even try to engage in conversation
0 likes@Henry Jubeda Outnumbered...?
1 likeOh well
0 likes@Grilled Leeks The justice system obviously didn't work here. I was against him at the start, then on the fence, then completely on his side towards the end. He did nothing wrong like wtf was the Jury thinking? and THIRTY YEARS? For a 2 second mistake? Its not like he kept shooting. He only shot once. This is just so stupid to me. Why does it matter he started to move away? He just SHOVED HIM, without ANY reason. "Protecting family" my ass. He was just talking to them.
0 likesHonestly.. its clear that everyone underneath this thread has certain opinions about what is deemed “a threat” and not. And although, I have my own it’s quite frustrating to see that.. why don’t we all just mind our own damn business so this does not have to happen anyways. Like everyone’s really arguing over the fact someone tried to do a good deed but in reality the kind of world we live in. Maybe there’s a different way you can go about positivity, but that’s just me. Mind our own business and live. Never had to be this complicated
1 likeAgreed. If the ethnicity was switched. Would there be all this questioning and reasoning.
0 likesHe shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
0 likes@Taco King If he was defending himself, he would have pulled out the gun, seen the guy backing away, and then not shot and called 911. Do you think an unarmed guy would decide to tackle a guy pointing a gun at him point blank. This isn’t a “court wants to blame white people” issue.
1 like@Puchowska I'm allowed to use examples to prove a point. He may have felt his life was in danger, but that doesn't give him a free pass to kill someone. It's obvious on the video that his life wasn't actually in danger, that's why he was sentenced and in jail for killing somebody. He wasn't in the right.
1 like@Taco King what is wrong with you, he killed someone because he was pushed not punched not shot not stabed pushed and markeis was clearly backing of once the gun was drawn yet drejka still shot.
1 like@valko ki You need to understand what an escalation is. When people are yelling, adrenaline is pumping. When you get knocked over, you are in a vulnerability situation. The victim wanted to de-escalate the situation and did so by asserting his power over the situation and knocked the guy with a gun down. Backing away doesn't matter. He escalated the situation. Doesn't means he "deserved" to die. No one "deserves" anything. The point is if you want to de-escalate a situation, don't escalate it.
0 likes@Dax Ratbone Calling Whites for everything they do "racist" makes you racist. Sorry but whenever a white person does something, it is directly racist, but the fact that whites are immediately referred to as such is also racist towards whites. Skin color shouldn't matter, we are all human.
0 likes@Skip the Chip he was retreating and not charging the guy he didn't need to shoot
0 likes@Mr abd The guy who was shot never said anything and just run towards the other one without him seeing the guy cuz he was out of his sight. Imagine someone does that to you what would you think while you are falling to the ground? Well he thought he get punched or something or worse. I don't think to shot someone is a good thing but it was his instinct at that point. He shot him one time, not several time otherwise he would've thought he wants to kill the other guy with several shots.
1 like@R B that's only first degree, 2nd degree doesn't require premeditated but this was still not 2nd or even 3rd degree murder. Manslaughter fits it perfectly.
0 likes@valko ki Well how about writing like a adult instead of insulting someone you don't know, huh? I'll ignore everything else what is coming from you from now on have a nice day.
0 likes@Annie Lin yeah, im not gonna "type like an adult" to someone trying to justify an unwarranted shooting
0 likes@JIM wow wow careful there badass, you might be too cool for this comment section to handle
0 likesBeing pushed doesnt give you the right to murder a man... I feel so horrible for his family. RIP
33 likesReplies (6)
True, but nobody has the right to push somebody that hard on the street also. Without having asked what the trouble is about. I do not think he got what he deserves but he provoked it.
6 likes@Holly Hope I'm seeing a lot of comments going "I'm not saying he deserved it BUT"
2 likesPeople are more focused on the push than the mediated murder
@vocal procrastinating Nobody deserves to be killed. In the most terrible occassions it takes two to tango. Fact.
0 likes@vocal procrastinating It was a cold-hearted murder by a narcissist who shows no remorse for his actions, better (or worse) yet he actually feels proud of what he has done to ''protect and serve''. But you can't deny that the push was kinda unneeded at the moment. It was mostly justified, he saw his girlfriend getting yelled at so he obviously, like any loving man, jumped in to protect her, but immediately going for a push is not the first thing you should go for. Regardless of whether the push was needed or not, that heartless jackass will be spending 20 years in jail. And seeing what a little coward he is, I'm sure he is getting his ass handed to him in prison. One comment said he already got folded by another inmate on Fab 11 2020, so at least life is giving him a little bit of the karma he deserves.
2 likes@Holly Hope it really isn’t hard to grasp why a man witnessing his significant other (with their children in the car with them) being confronted by an aggressive stranger would go and respond with aggression.
0 likes@Victoria Pitts Well, I live in Germany. But I have also been to the States for a year. And there are significant differences in mentality and behavior. "Open" agression you do not find as often as in the States, also racism and for sure NO GUNS. Nobody (few expeptions) is allowed to own a gun or carry around. If somebody gets shot here you know it is a motor gang or the mafia ;-) Regards from Berlin!
0 likesHe killed a guy cuz he got pushed to the floor, how pathetic.
2 likesthe other part of that rule he quoted is to aim at center mass before you fire...he wanted to kill the guy...
0 likes"I've never been in a fight", i just kill people
3 likesAll because this clown couldn't just mind his own business. 2 tough guys, one armed, one just younger and bigger. Her bf had absolutely no right to just walk straight up and assault him as he did, normal reasonable people are able to talk before resorting to violence. And likewise the shooter had absolutely no right to fire his weapon, he was in no danger, ego bruised, just producing the pistol was probably unwarranted at that time
0 likesThought his right arm was hurt 🤨
1 likeLol this fool “I looked around to make sure there weren’t any more threats” 😂 He’s such a cringe poser. And at 1:17 when the detective asks what he does when he finds/doesn’t find wheelchair placards, he can tell the questions aren’t really going his way so he puts his arms on the table and forgets all about his “injury”, the one so bad he had to tie it up with his shirt and shake hands using his left side. This is too fun to watch 🤣
0 likesHis lawyer is so pretentious
1 likeWhat worries me is why did he take the gun to his regular store which was minutes from his house. Why the need?
1 likethe sad thing is, if he had a lawyer, he likely would have gotten off
0 likesHe's going to get lessons in fighting without a glock. Why wasn't that premeditated murder? He was warned not to do it. He plans it by looking for it, with a gun. He stalks the area. What exactly were his movements that day? Then he ambushes a woman and children. Shoots and kills a fleeing man. Something I saw was the gun follow Marquis as he retreated to the store. He has no record, yet there are other people including women and children he threatened with a gun. I don't get that part. imho this is murder and who says he has just not been caught for other crimes? He knew he was on camera and there was a witness, so of course he would wait for police and play justified. He was too calm for a first kill. Remember how calm the defense said he was? Especially if he was on energy drinks. Hmm possibly a By-law enforcement officer by day and energy drink night stalker ...by night.
1 likeInterviewer: I want you to tell us about yourself
0 likesHim: I'm a piece of sht human
the prosecutor said marquis name wrong multiple times, why didn't the defendant used that as a defense
0 likesAlthough I do believe this is murder, this just goes towards never, ever talking to the police. In an interrogation they are never there to help, even if you're innocent. A detectives job is to convict, never exonerate
2 likesi would not want that defense attorney to defend me in court
1 likeThe reporters voice took me by surprise, it's just so odd
0 likesI will not answer any questions without an attorney present
1 likeThis is educational to me tbh
0 likesProbley should have just parked in one of the many open parking spots.. ya know
1 likeI love this channel sm
0 likesStop with the moral equivalency of shoving someone to the ground and shooting someone. I get it you have an absolutist view of both morality and the law; bad is bad is bad. That mindset works great in whatever cartoon world the people who believe it live in. There are misdemeanours and felonies. There are classes of felonies (in some states). Clearly, there is some collective understanding that assault is worse than shoplifting. You know what is absolute though? Death. People are dead or alive and that father is dead.
1 likeI even feel sorry for the guy. He's just dumb. No critical thinking in a certain situation, just blindly following some rules whether they're applicable or not.
0 likes“When i come up on target!!” Straight up talking about the person he shot moments ago like it’s range day. People like this don’t NEED a gun. Damn.
3 likesIt takes so much Karen energy to inspect someone's car for handicap tags.
6 likesThat guns ownership and open carrying is legal in the USA is absolutely beyond me, this is another life lost because this nutter has a gun. And don't even start about 'responsible gun owners', look at the rest of the world, if there is no gun threat, you don't need a gun. Sure in ie. the UK people are using knives and it is also a problem, but knives will always be inherently less dangerous than a gun.
1 like39:50 on changing the way he did things
1 likeI see that arm hurt whenever it feels.
0 likesWow this incident is extremely disturbing. So much is wrong with this and the woman is sitting in the driver's seat at a convenience store with the child in the car he's such a liar the man was protecting his own and he was backing up when he saw the gun. This guy had murder in his heart his conscience had been seared I'm very angry at his actions extremely angry. WOW. SMH
0 likesPeople legit be so crazy now and days he went looking for a problem like and because I’m psych major bio minor I do understand that people are sometimes disturb but it’s just always be so unprovoked with all these cases
0 likesOmg If I see this guy in real life
0 likesIf JCS has taught me anything it's.. DO NOT FUCKING TALK TO THE POLICE WITHOUT A LAWYER
0 likesJust imagine a country where guns aren't freely available😵
0 likesThey sent in white bald detectives to put him at ease, brilliant.
1 likeWe veterans refer to these kinds of guys as GI-Jerkoffs
1 likeSay yes to self defense weapons😂 sick world
0 likesThis guy is the shooting range die hard, that acts like normal life is one big tactical excercise he did on the range last week. The instructor said he did a good job so he thinks he is a real seal or green beret in combat.
0 likesThe worst thing is that I truly feel bad for Drejka. He is fully guilty, has deep issues, and belongs in prison. But I feel so bad... He genuinely believes he was doing the right thing and that that's how it's supposed to thing. It seems like because of the level of his emotional awareness, he hasn't been able to process beyond "self-defense" and has remained at a certain developmental stage, at least regarding this issue. Imo, that makes him a danger to society and that's why he should be put away. I feel so sad for him though. He seems like a well-intentioned man (does not mean he actually does have good intentions..).
0 likeshe was right to pull his gun he was attacked, but only to defuse what might have happened next, no right to fire his gun.
0 likes32:05 thats the cutest forensic team I have ever seen.
0 likesTelling his story, he is SO enjoying himself.
0 likesA small part of me feels bad, because I don’t think this is a man who is purely evil, or has any evil intentions. However, his problem is that he feels like he’s invincible because he’s carrying around a firearm. Sure, McGlockton’s car shouldn’t have been parked in a handicapped spot, but the argument never should have escalated as far as it did. Drejka knew his life wasn’t in danger, but in his mind, being shoved to the ground is a valid reason to take someone’s life. He was so eager to use his gun that once he was in a situation where in his eyes could be justified in the slightest, he took that opportunity. My heart goes out to McGlockton and his family, and his son who had to watch his own father collapse right in front of him.
5 likesThat wasn’t self defense, it was revenge:
1107 likes“You pushed me, I have the right to shoot you.”
We cannot have people like this guy in a society, if we want that society to be safe. What’s really disturbing - it chills me to the bones, frankly; when you think about it, is that he was armed already when he argued/had a heated conversation with the woman in the driver’s seat, with her small children in the car..
Replies (40)
I swear these exact words were in my mind when I heard the prosecution's testimony. It was revenge. Drejka was pushed, he fell on his sorry ass, got angry and punished the guy by shooting him to take revenge for shoving him. The angle at which the bullet entered the body was another argument which I thought should have been risen. It wasn't the front side of the chest or torso, nor anywhere near the sternum. The wound was almost a perfect flank underneath the ribs. This case was simply about a small angry petty little SOB pretending to be a cop who wasn't even fit to be a security guard at a remote petrol station.
61 likesAbsolutely. This man has a classic Napoleon complex that directly coincides with his fetish for being a hero. He's a danger to everyone around him. He was battered first, yes, but that wasn't grounds to shoot someone who was stepping away from you. They were already showing a digression in escalation. The 2 seconds between the two men before he decided to shoot, regardless of circumstance, is what really gives me chills.
50 likes@Zachary Green thank you for an even better explanation. Notes taken. Cheers
5 likesI think you are doing Michael a bit of a disservice here. That was more than just a tiny push. Markeis pushed him so hard that he flew onto his back. If you have ever been attacked, beaten, or knocked prone then you would know how terrifying that is. Michael was justified in pulling his gun but shooting an unarmed man who was clearly trying to escape is disgusting. I get this sick feeling in my gut while watching the video and seeing it happen. That being said, every American has the right to bear arms (with the exception of felons) and there was nothing wrong with Michael having one on hand to defend himself. If you aren't physically powerful and know that a small breeze can knock you over let alone a grown 200-pound man then I suggest you buy a gun to protect yourself. It might save your life someday.
35 likes@InlikeFlynn i think the guy was not 'fleeing' but trying to rub it in his face along with is wife when he saw the gun and tried to deescalate the situation with a hero wannaber who was very angry at the time so i say it should have been 2 years in solitary not 20 in reg.
3 likes@Zachary Green You're right seeing someone yelling at your wife over a stupid parking space in a nearly empty parking lot would make anybody pissed off but I would say that most people wouldn't resort to violence immediately. Most people would use words first, yell at Michael tell him to go away but Markeis said nothing and attacked Michael causing Michael to panic and pull his gun. They both handled this situation poorly the difference is that one of them walked away from this instance and the other is dead and that fills me with sadness. It shouldn't have turned out this way.
16 likes@Zachary Green no what i see is a white dude with anger issues and a black dude with WORSE ANGER ISSUES
10 likes@Deathkillshoot The Brony of Naboo I'm not, I simply represented what I would also do in that case, had I been him.
15 likesI have a concealed carry and have been in confrontations before. Hell, I've been sucker punched and didn't feel the need to pull my gun. This man let his ego be inflated by the fact that he had a firearm. Plain and simple.
@Zebness If the white guy was bigger, would the black guy have been so aggressive or would he have shown him more respect and tried to de-escalate? It goes both ways.
5 likes@Zachary Green Napoleon complex? Interesting take... Funny how there's no word for overly aggressive tall men who take advantage of their size to bully shorter men. It's always the short guy's fault. As if short guys don't have it hard enough already from the get go.
7 likes@InlikeFlynn Absolutely correct!
0 likesWell you can be armed whenever you want. What's disturbing to me is that he thinks it makes him some sort of arbiter of law. I couldn't imagine starting a fight when I carry
3 likesIt's also VERY worth mentioning 4 others came forward to attest he harassed them in their vehicles as well, one of which was a woman with two children in the vehicle as well, and stated he even threatened them that he had a gun. That's pretty much all I need to hear to know he'd been thinking of doing it for a while, even if just subconsciously him doing it consistently was just a means to give him the opportunity.
5 likesdont push people that might help
4 likes @Sharpshooter You're right, a light shove done against someone who is unbalanced will cause them to fall over but this was no light shove. Even with the grainy footage, you can see Markeis putting his weight behind that push. Fighting for most people is uncommon as most people try to resolve situations using words and only use violence as a last resort. As to whether or not being knocked prone and helpless against an unknown assailant is terrifying or not I suppose it depends on whether or not you like being helpless. It shouldn't just be the yanks who are soft, fighting is assault and carries a jail sentence and ultimately I wouldn't say Americans are soft so much as cautious. In the U.S. people like suing each other. The national pastime is not baseball it's suing your neighbor's pants off for every tiny infraction of the law. Imagine trying to start fights in a society that wants to steal your money at every opportunity.
3 likes@InlikeFlynn Hell I saw a handicapped person park in a able spot. Man was I angry. How dare they. I let the tyres down on his wheel chair.😜
0 likesAlso cant have guys shoving people over blind sided 🤷♂️
2 likes@The Adventures of Steve-Marco sorry, was he supposed to ask for consent to shove him? Did he ask consent to go harassing that woman about how the car was parked?
0 likes@Lotus Auer telling someone they shouldn't be parking there isn't harassment 🤦♂️🤦♂️
2 likes@data exactly.
0 likesLike when I played dodgeball and really got this kid good. He was so enraged that he came up right behind me when I wasnt looking and through the ball hard on my back... Nothing but racist inferiority complex, and revenge or a mix
0 likesA push can lead to someone's death though... there was a story of this renter who was pushed by the young man he was trying to help, and he died cause he landed hard on his head. Sorry, if you're going to physically assault someone get ready for the consequences. Of course, since the guy initiated the shouting match and was the original aggressor his claim to self defense is gone. But your statement “You pushed me, I have the right to shoot you.” is absolutely correct, despite your sarcasm. If you go around assaulting people for no reason, a simple push could be the end of your life as well as the life of the person you pushed.
1 like@Kira but the push did nothing.. no threat remained. Done deal
0 likes@Kira Nopeee. In most countries and states, its `You push me , i can shoot you` If you have a gun in hand and a person pushes you to ground you can use it( or tries to push you to ground). I think kyle rittenosue case is a perfect example of that. But you can't use the gun the way this guy used. Practically as soon as markeis stopped advancing after michael draw his gun. The reason to fire it was gone. He could've kept it drawn as a protective measure but shooting was totally illegal.
2 likesthats what I saw, if the dude continued to attack and charge then maybe, but he stopped next to his wife. That looks like a man protecting his family, dude should have minded his own business, its a frikking parking spot!!!
0 likesI gotta say that I do not feel sorry for the guy who got shot at all. At the end of the day you cannot sneak up behind somebody and fucking assault them just because they were arguing with your wife. The fact that he had zero issue immediately reacting with violence(in front of his kids no less) says everything I need to know about him. Hell just the fact that they decided to park in a handicapped zone with their kids present leads to me to believe that they were teaching their kids all kinds of fucked up behavior.
1 like"Oh but he was yelling at her!" I don't care, don't assault people you fools. Come on now we learned this in kindergarten.
Let me be clear however, Michael was NOT within his right to kill this man and absolutely deserved his sentence. He could have easily charged this loser with assault and would have won 100%.
That said all I'm seeing here is natural selection at play. If you think you can just go through life assaulting people who inconvenience you then good luck because you're going to need it. Say what you will but at the end of the day I've already won because I'm not some dumbass who got shot for trying to be tough.
@Joe King assaulting someone deserves death in your view? Even in these circumstances ? Man you're brutal in a bad sense.
1 like@Joe King personally I disagree, but that is an interesting perspective.
0 likesHow dare you challenge my ego?! I'm self-appointed parking inspector; I was just doing my job. Drejka was in fear, not for his life, but in fear of another ego blow. We HAVE to learn to tame that ego.
0 likesThe fact that he said he literally could not imagine if he would approach someone if he didn’t have a firearm because he has never ever gone without carrying one.. man is looking for an opportunity to shoot someone
0 likes@Deathkillshoot The Brony of Naboo but it doesn’t matter if the black man has “worse anger issues” - he didn’t deserve to get shot!! Nothing he did, nothing he said would have made him a fair target for deadly violence. No one had any right to shoot him since he wasn’t any deadly threat to anybody anywhere.
0 likes@Annabella LeForce that’s fucking scary 😟
1 like@Rosemary ehhhhhh
0 likesDid they check this gun man's criminal history? He doesn't look like a good person.
0 likesI feel like he wouldnt have pulled the gun if the guy didnt get aggressively physical. In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it. If he got physical then the guy would wanna get back at him harder, which is shooting the gun. Theres no equal revenge at that point.
0 likesThe victim stepped back 3 times and he still aimed and shot him. I feel he would still pull the gun without the victim pushed him on the ground.
0 likesi could do without either of them. fortunately thats kinda what we got.
0 likes@Rosemary Agreed it doesn't matter legally, but still a dumb idea to go around pushing people to the ground. Being legally in the right doesn't mean you won't end up dead. Never know who has an itchy trigger finger and looking for a reason to shoot someone.
0 likes@InlikeFlynn I completely agree with this statement.
0 likesself defence is generally considered to be arguable when it is evident that the victim is incapable of escaping the situation. if the perpetrator here had just got up from the ground, turned around, and attempted to dash away, and the man who pushed him followed even by one inch, then the perpetrator turned around and shot him, it would be arguable as self defence
0 likes19 minutes for cops?!?
1 likeno way Mr.McGlockton was killed by a Glock.
0 likesWhat I’m shocked by is that the prosecutor uses the term “perfect shot”, with the bullet going through the lungs and heart.
0 likesThat would never be used here in Europe, as it’s quite the opposite of perfect. Only in America I guess. Gun slingers...
Replies (1)
You missed the point. The shot was perfect in that it was extremely likely to be lethal. That’s virtually impossible to dispute. It would be a lethal shot in the U.S., Europe, and anywhere else in the world. He’s not saying that it was morally or ethically perfect.
1 like35:02 Gun Control Now because people with deadly weapons often cannot control themselves when they are frightened, angry, drunk or depressed. 'It was over when that gun came out.'
0 likesEye for a eye. Just cap the genius and be done with it.
0 likesThat poor women and her kids :(
2 likesAbsolutely heart breaking. My prayers go out to her
Lost her lover and father to her kids for absolutely no good reason other than (in my opinion) racism… I have a strong feeling that he wouldn’t have shot him if he was white- also assumed authorities would take his side 🙄
Replies (1)
Theres nothing racist about this case at all.
1 likeCarrying a weapon will give any normal person an elevated sense of safely, which easily can become a sense of empowerment to initiate confrontation that they otherwise would not engage. This video is a perfect example, he is walking up to a parked car with unknown people inside, is verbally aggressive over parking in a handicap spot, and then find himself pushed to the ground from someone he did not expect. Psychologically, this is very likely a moment he has been anticipating for many years, some type of confrontation that he perceives requires deadly force. He is, the real life example of Travis Bickle from the movie Taxi Driver. In his mind, he is the vigilante hero that was confronting out of control criminals. What I wonder about, is how many unreported confrontations had he initiated over the years, but the people backed away because they became aware he had a gun. Such confrontations would further escalate his increasing sense of power and authority over others that led to this deadly encounter. He had developed a bit of a God complex. In otherwords, he was going to shoot somebody someday, it simply was a matter of time. And it would not surprise me if, like in the movie Taxi Driver, he practiced at home in the mirror saying something similar to "Are you talking to me?" and then practices repeatedly pulling out the weapon pointing it at himself in the mirror as if mirror image were someone pointing a gun at him. Another common term that could be applied is Self-fulling prophecy.
1009 likesReplies (42)
Good comment. It is absolutely right that the person with the weapon is more likely starting a confrontation because last but not least he will not get harmed in a fight. Maybe Dr. Grande is known here. Within another but similar case he stated, that the one with the weapon has the duty to care about calming down and de-escalating the situation.
29 likesyeah this is basically what happens when people dont train or check laws, a gun is an extremely usefull self defense tool but this guy really didnt know how to use it hell he could have just flashed the gun at him the confrontation probably would have finished then still tho he should not have started the confrontation by parking by them and making an argument
12 likes@OceanSwimmer Yeah. I don't make sweeping assumptions about those who own guns. I lived in Alaska where is it was wise to own a gun because bears are everywhere, including the major cities. Such people tend to be smart about owning a weapon. Hypothetically, it is reasonable to conclude that Drekja could have just as easily run another car off the road with his truck because the driver did not properly signal a lane change. The driver dies as a result, and Drekja justifies his actions to the police in same way, he perceives that his actions were required, it was him or the driver of the other car, which he would point out the driver started the deadly the counter by not properly signaling a lane change and Drekja had no other course of action to save himself.
7 likes@cika blyat Ideally, the gun lobby and avid gun owners would be the ones who push the strongest to keep firearms out of the hands of people who are likely to misuse weapons. Such as levels of proficiency and ethical use of weapons. Level 1: demonstrate that a person can handle a weapon correctly, store is safely, know what to do after it has been fired, etc. Advancing to higher levels would entitle individuals to own more powerful weapons because they have proven to the gun owning community (their peers) that they have acquired the skills and experience needed to handle those weapons and are emotionally\mental stable. They rise to become the best of the best, highly respective individuals for their skills and very high ethical standards on how they use of weapons.
3 likesHey "F Lee Bailey",
1 likejust stick to the facts, don't creatively make- up a story, that you have no way of knowing has any truth, whatsoever.
You are obviously are unfamiliar with the subject matter.
3 likesYour describing criminal behavior, not normal people who are able to defend themselves, armed or not.
3 likes@P M The description is about mental and emotional instability\maturity that can lead to a crime. A stable adult of his age would have unlikely fired the weapon. But, even before it got that far, a stable person would most likely walked away rather than continue to escalate the confrontation over a car parked in a spot reserved for handicap drivers.
8 likesAny normal person carrying a weapon gets a heightened sense of responsibility, as would any normal martial artist, that’s why you don’t see normal people (meaning what’s common) flipping out on handicap parking and firing shots when they don’t have to.
1 likeWhich would be criminal. Which is what you described.
@P M Yes, all normal individuals that carry a weapon should have sense of responsibility but is not always true. I assume it is for most.
5 likes@Neal Noble
1 likeI appreciate the reply.
@P M The contents of the video are very interesting as well as the ripple effects.
2 likesBravo 👏🏼
0 likesU summed up cops 👮♀️
0 likes@Neal Noble -- yeah, I agree about Drejka. He had complaints on the record of brandishing his weapon at other drivers, one of whom had children in the car.
1 likeHis attitude is scary & creepy.
Parking in the handicap spot and pushing someone on the ground over an argument, knowing cops won't do shit about it is the type of thing that Taxi Driver is based on though. The assault was as unjustified as the shooting and they both paid severely.
0 likes@Bender_82 moral equivalency at its finest.
1 likeapparently he had threatened people before with his gun several times, so you are correct. This guy is a wuss wuss
2 likeslmao i could picture him saying thay inside my head as i read the words:-) damn that movie is so good ……..
0 likesI think he was mad at them parking at the disable parking spot. I feel like he wouldnt have pulled the gun if the guy didnt get aggressively physical. In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it. If he got physical then the guy would wanna get back at him harder, which is shooting the gun. Theres no equal revenge at that point.
0 likes@Christina Galler they were both in the wrong, but if Drefka had been a man and fought with his fists instead of immediately going to the gun like a coward, a father would still be alive and Drefka would have his worthless life back.
4 likesOof- yeah I can agree with that, tho I live in alaska and I open carry/conceal carry a lot. Mostly when I’m going fishing. I grew up shooting guns (it’s literally one of my earliest memories) but I was also taught at a young age that you don’t A) point that thing at anyone or anything you don’t plan to shoot B) a very high level of muzzle awareness/gun safety C) you’re absolutely RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERY BULLET that leaves the chamber so you better know your target and know your backdrop.
0 likesWe don’t require any kind of formal training here to open carry/conceal carry and to me it is concerning. I think people should at least have to pass a basic safety course and background check in order to carry a gun. I agree that it gives some a false sense of security and they think they’re a badass and don’t fully comprehend or understand pulling a gun on someone. I was also in the military for 14 years where I deployed 4 times and carried at least one gun 24/7 during that time. It’s nothing for me to carry a gun/just feels like an extension of myself- BUT pulling that same gun on someone is a huge deal to me- it’s something I NEVER want to have to do and I find the though actually terrifying. I’ve used it for warning shots for a moose when I was with my dog team once and also to warn off a sow grizzly bear who had a cub when I was salmon fishing. That was incident enough for me but it’s also a great tool to have to protect yourself in the back woods. I don’t carry it if I go to the gas station or grocery store (unless I’m going fishing)
I really can agree with the fact that not all people should be able to carry firearms if they have a history of violence or are not right in the head. But on the flip side- there are just regular people like me that use it for self protection/protection of my dear sleddogs when in the Alaskan back country.
@Christopher Anderson He turned a verbal fight to a physical one. He aggressively started the physical fight first. That’s why you don’t do that to stranger coz u don’t know who has weapons.
2 likes@Christina Galler A lesson for the living, never get physically aggressive with anyone, lets alone a stranger who might be unstable and carrying a weapon. The killed man was ticked off that some strange man was verbally hostile to his wife\GF, and ended up dead because he over-reacted. The same can be said for Drejka, he over-reacted to someone parking in a handicapped spot, and now he will spend the rest of his life in prison. Bottom line, two strangers over-reacted to a very trivial situation, and both lost their lives over it.
2 likes@Frank Paya I heard most Franks can't type their way out of a wet paper Youtube comment.
0 likesHave you heard about a very similar case when the shooter, Mike Dunn shot a teenager in a truck at a convenience store for playing loud music. Dunn said, "Are you talking to me?"
1 likeI like it. You make good sense
0 likes@Christopher Anderson lol
0 likesYou could've just said Ban guns. The thing about that is, in countries where guns are banned, people actually don't feel afraid to verbally speak their mind when they see someone breaking the law, like the person parking in a handicapped space. It's win-win, both sides. No overly aggressive responses to verbal confrontations; no vigilantes.
0 likesVery well said. I agree. You are so smart
0 likes@Christina Galler
0 likesIn a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it.Technically the guy who appointed himself the parking space monitor (Drejka) initiated the entire subsequent chain of events that led to his own demise and the death of another person. He created the conflict even if for some perverse reason he felt in his head that he was in the right. And I do think the push was a violent overreaction, but nonetheless Drejka inserted himself into those people's lives that day. And he did it while carrying.
@The Great Pumpkin was that a disabled parking space? If so then Drejka was just telling them to not use that space. If Drejka is that bad, he would have shot those people in the car. It was only until someone else got physical when he took out his gun. That’s how I judge the video. I don’t know him or the full story that we don’t get to hear or see.
0 likes@Christina Galler
0 likeswas that a disabled parking space?I've actually read that it wasn't [a legal handicapped parking space], although this came out after the fact. And Drejka might have been justified in drawing his weapon because he was attacked, however he was not justified in shooting the weapon. Drejka was also a guy with a documented history of confronting people over the same parking spot (which at the time was poorly painted and easy to miss if you weren’t paying attention).
@Christina Galler
0 likesI would suggest you look into Drejka's history, too. He had been pulling the gun when people’s driving annoyed him at least four times, meaning it's possible there are more undocumented instances. Two of these were on women with kids in the car. He also pulled on two teenagers who slowed down for a yellow instead of running it. In short, he - much like many aggressive cops or wannabe vigilante/security/police types - has a past history of aggressive and anti-social behavior prior to some case that ends tragically for someone.
@The Great Pumpkin I never did say what he did is justified. But if you start being physical then you’re asking for it. You don’t know if these people are crazy and might have a weapon. If he didn’t push him like that, I’m sure the outcome would be so much different. Maybe I’m watching too many instant karma videos.
0 likes@The Great Pumpkin I never did say what he did is justified. But if you start being physical then you’re asking for it. You don’t know if these people are crazy and might have a weapon. If he didn’t push him like that, I’m sure the outcome would be so much different. Maybe I’m watching too many instant karma videos.
0 likes@Christina Galler
0 likesif you start being physical then you’re asking for it. You don’t know if these people are crazy and might have a weapon.I don't know that you're ASKING TO BE SHOT, but I do agree that if you do this you're inviting trouble. But the fact remains that Drejka ultimately initiated the entire sequence of events:
If he didn’t push him like that, I’m sure the outcome would be so much different.True, but also, if Drejka didn't harass someone over a parking space, NONE of what followed would have transpired, either. And he has a history of doing this, so maybe he was asking for it? Considering the following history, it follows that if the shooting was "instant karma", then Drejka getting pushed and ultimately incarcerated was "delayed karma" for all of the following:
A truck driver parked in that same spot.
3 months prior to this incident, Drejka confronted one Richard Kelly, who claims that at some point during the argument Drejka told him he was going to shoot him.
A woman who drove too slow through a school zone: On December 12, 2012, a woman told a Largo Police Department officer that a man driving a black Toyota truck (later identified as Drejka) pointed a gun at her and the passengers in the vehicle.
A teen didn’t drive through a yellow light. On January 10, 2012, Tyler Smith was driving with a friend when a traffic light turned yellow. Smith decided not to drive through the light and stopped his vehicle. Drejka honked his horn and yelled at Smith. Drejka held a black handgun out the driver’s side window of his vehicle and motioned for Smith to walk back to his truck.
Then there was also a brake-checking incident. What he did can cause a major accident. And Drejka was cited for this.
I carry and avoid all confrontation at all costs. I never want to actually have to use my weapon on a living being but will if my kids' lives are being threatened. It's very last resort. Just difference in personalities I guess.
0 likesOoh. You put so much effort into sounding like the JCS narrator, then hit us with "self-fulling" 🥴
0 likesCan I like your comment 100 more times? 🤸♀️🤸♀️🤸♀️
0 likesI disagree that carrying a gun gives you a sense of safety making you more likely to confront. My husband carries and he avoids any and all conflict BC he is carrying and would never want to use his weapon. People who carry don’t automatically want to use the gun…most de-escalate bc they don’t want to have to hurt anyone. This man was absolutely looking for a reason to use his gun…it was not self defense. In my opinion if you’re the aggressor then you are not acting in “self defense” you’re the perpetrator, the violent one…and this man took away a father, husband, son, and friends life away from many who loved him, for no reason at all. I pray for the victims family, and I pray this is a lesson that carrying a gun should be reason to avoid confrontation and like the commenter said it’s a LAST RESORT when you feel like you or a loved one is in serious danger. The LAST resort.
0 likesPeople who lawfully carry weapons stop criminals and defend themselves and others lawfully every day, my husband included. This man was mentally unstable. I am for the 2nd amend, however, I am also for background checks and not letting people with mental histories of any kind purchase weapons.
0 likesALL HE DID WAS PUSH HIM WTF
0 likesBlah blah comment. Love you JCS. I know what you stand for, keep being based.
0 likesFor anyone who is interested in how long he got: He was sentenced to 20 years for this in October 2019. Also 2 days ago, Feb, 2020 he was attacked in jail with a lock in a sock and had to be put in protective custody for his own safety..
339 likesReplies (28)
Joseph N you mean feb 2020?
19 likesgoddamn, this man is a time traveler too! you'd ought to expect he'd go back and fix this from ever happening
15 likesThey put him in protective custody? Shame.
21 likesHuh..no shit
1 like🤣😂🤣😂
0 likesHe means 2 days ago February 2020
5 likesAh, the old Lock in a Sock.
18 likesbeat. Surprised prisoners can still have locks. They were using the lock sock as a weapon in the 90s and probably earlier.
4 likesbeat with a lock in a sock, falls to ground...reaches for gun, here we go again...remembers where he is, oh shit!!!
24 likesGood lol
1 likeHe probably had an altercation with another inmate for using the handicap toilet 😂😂😂
29 likesLock in a sock.
1 likeSounds like a new product thats just came out.
@S K Sounds like a Dr Suess book gone wrong...
10 likesJoseph N so he’s not that tough in jail.
4 likesJustice 🦾
2 likesI knew him getting hurt in prison would happen 🤣
6 likesRyan Depaulo: Degenerate Gambler Yeah, sorry. I meant to say Feb 2020. 😅
2 likesRichard Porter needs the lock in a sock himself. He can't possibly know what's being said between the parties. But what is abundantly clear is that the G.I. Joe wannabe is the one who initiated everything. Sure looks to me like the boyfriend was offended by what he was saying to his girlfriend and pushed him down. He got a boo boo and his feelings were hurt so he shot him. Too scared to fight him like a real man would do. By the way, how do you know he got the lock in a sock?
10 likesPOS, placard cop
1 like@Jordan Brooks 😀😀
1 likeHaha what a threatening world he lives in 😂
0 likes20 years!! This is not fair at all. A guy with money and fame killed his ex wife and friends and got free of all charges. On the other hand, a guy trying to do the right thing was attacked by wrong doer and had to kill the guy for self defense is sentenced to 20 years. You Americans are funny.
2 likes@Jordan Brooks OMG That made me laugh so hard. Many thanks
2 likes@Kristi Morrison LMBAO!
1 likeHurrah... hope it was a right clunk on top of his ridiculous empty bullying dome.
0 likesThow him back to the wolves
0 likes@Erin Dorrell , I remember the cans from old prison movies like Bad Boys
0 likes@blacknosugarnocream so im an idiot because our opinions are different from each other.!! You let OJ get away with murder. Your American system is funny from an unbiased foreign person. Im from Nort East India, we are not these typical Indian rather a tibeto burman decindent.
0 likesSo,
Why they park in handicap spot.?
Why the father shoved him instead of trying to reason him. The driver was physically big and was a bully here, he knew he can slapt around that little guy, that's why he pushed him. But he bullied the wrong person. Clearly we all knew the killer is some sort of a looney.
just whos side was this defendant guy on?
0 likesI was waiting for him to use the Shakira Defense, 'Hips don't lie.'
1 likehe def doesn't look like he talked to her "politely" in the video......
0 likesLaying in bed 🛌 all comfy 🛌 Watching these fools smash 💥 there lives up 🔝😜👍 I’d sure hate to be you 😜👍 especially being 5/o 👮🏻♂️
1 likeHe had no reason to shoot...
0 likesThe scary part of this is the man genuinely believing he did no wrong. He was scared of a big black guy that pushed him to the ground because of a confrontation he started of him yelling at his girlfriend with his multiple children around so like a coward he pulls his gun out presumably from racial stereotypes assuming the mans going to shoot or stab him and purposely takes aim and shoots this man knowing damn well he was backing away. He was just looking for an excuse to shoot somebody.
30 likesReplies (8)
You’re terrible person, too say such a thing, no matter what a person has done no one deserves death. Mistakes don’t =death, then everyone in the world would be dead. Pls think before you comment
4 likes@SushiNoodles I'm just trolling
3 likes@COD ProCamp You know this is about serious stuff, right? These are real people who have gone through real shit- is this really the right place to troll?
7 likes@COD ProCamp based
1 like@COD ProCamp coke is probably better for lives than cod
1 like@Kat L-K the blow habit is killing me and I quit playing COD 2 years ago
0 likes@COD ProCamp based
0 likesyou're literally the only person perpetuating racial stereotypes, OP.
0 likesGet pushed to the ground
0 likesGet shot dead
Yep, seems equal to me...
iffy 1 never put your hands on folks 2 if u seen him stop shouldn't have shot just tell him to back up but then again I wasn't there in the heat of the moment he probably legit thought he was in some shit cant say if I would have shot or not but u feel like if he gave homeboy a verbal warning after he pulled the gun nobody would have died
0 likesThe defence attorney was awful and cringe. I almost couldn’t even get through that
0 likesWhat sucks is that the sheriff first declined to charge, it was the state prosecutors who came through on this.
0 likes11:13 too many smart people words
0 likeshe forgot his hands were achy lol
0 likesIs anybody else curious what the face is behind the magnificent voice of JCS?
0 likesLawyer job is basically a class competition who made better presentation, Exept evryone hates u 😭
0 likesAnyone notice how this guys sprained wrist seems to become painless every time he gets hot and bothered and starts raising his voice, talking fast, and whipping his sore wrist around, then he babies it again when he starts to calm down?
0 likesThe fact that he’s making false statements about the nature of the initial engagement tells you all you need to know about a man walking around with a gun. He’s instigating conflict in the HOPE that he’s able to use his weapon.
231 likesReplies (3)
Tbh, even if you're in the right, it's not surprising to be in a defensive state considering the fact that you could think you might've just done something wrong. When things like these happen in the spur of the moment, you can never tell.
1 likeCouldn't help but feel that way when I first saw the video. Deep down he's been waiting for that day. The sick power fantasy.
8 likesHell_Pike there are plenty of folks walking around with that mentality. They all have this perverse hero fantasy rattling around their skulls. Many of them literally praying they are involved in a scenario where they are the “good guy with a gun”’ that puts a halt to some forthcoming tragedy. It’s extremely misguided, and makes for dangerous gun owners.
4 likesStrange..... So this is what we call justiice...
0 likesIt’s truly amazing how many times the interrogator asks him “so he did something to provoke a fear for you life, right?” only for him to respond “no! Absolutely not! I had no reason at all to fire!”
290 likesReplies (17)
Interrogator was trying to help him.. sounds about white
70 likes@J B bruh
11 likes@J B fr, normally they pick apart people like this but these guys were like- trying to hold his hand the whole time
15 likes@J B you understand WHY.... he’s not trying to help him. He’s trying to be his buddy so the dude doesn’t lawyer up. And so the perp can incriminate him self more. Is this your first video? You should watch more videos to understand this tactic
39 likes@Jennifer x9000 that's why I love opinions. We all have them.
0 likes@Nigel TV What you mean by "opinion"? What Jennifer said is not a matter of opinion bruh :D It's a fact
8 likes@J B What the other commenter said. Watch some other videos so you'll understand. He definetly wasn't trying to help him.
2 likes@Nigel TV not a opinion a fact.
0 likes@Jennifer x9000 Michael Drejka was released from custody right after this interrogation. He killed a black man and he was allowed to walk free for a month. Didn’t even have to make bail. If that isn’t the epitome of white privilege then please tell me what that is.
10 likes@Jennifer x9000 i read your other comment and that tactic makes sense, so ill agree on that
3 likesstill don’t just say people who disagree with you are either dumb or kids lmao.
@J B It’s a little childish to assume he was let go because he was white. Sure it isn’t fair when it happens, but there are plenty of black, Hispanic, and Asian people who were allowed to leave after interrogation despite being guilty. It is not a color thing, it’s a criminal justice thing; claiming it to be the former is lazy, and you can’t even prove it, so why say something like that which only spreads separation and does not really aim to fix the problem you’re pointing out?
3 likes@Kayla Short oh yeah.. pointing out systemic racism “spreads” separation. Let’s all just ignore it then. Wouldn’t want to “spread separation” because apparently that’s all that matters.
6 likes@J B 36:39 child. This has nothing to do with race but how this shit goes. You clearly don’t understand how some INVESTIGATIONS are handled .
0 likesY’all need to take investigators with a grain of salt. These people are not your friends. But you think they are on your side Bc that’s what they want you to think. I’ll stop trying to teach the ignorant and hope your knowledge of police work/ investigation has nothing to do with race IN THIS CASE.
0 likes@biggie maggot talking about the other comment
0 likes@J B It sounds like he was trying to help him but he was actually just trying to cooperate with him in a way that he would not ask for legal counsel or not stop giving information
0 likes@J B Nah but fr. What do you say to the fact that blacks, hispanics, asians, and other races are also sometimes let out during investigations??
0 likesThis is what Michael McGlockton's Father said to Drejka in court:
1055 likes"You deserve to die in prison," he said. "In the Bible, it says that in order to get into heaven we must forgive those who trespass against us. At this point in my life, I am not there yet. And if it just so happens that the Lord chooses to take me before I come to terms with this, then I will see you in hell, where you and I will finish this. Mark my words."
Holy Shit
Replies (25)
Is there a video of him saying that?
46 likesAlso I don’t wanna be one of those assholes that correct people but you got the names switched up, it’s Markeis McGlockton
Damn
0 likesWow if that is true it's one of the most badass & beautiful things ever said in real life.
58 likesholy fuck that was powerful....
16 likes@Zombie4Skin nah I said his father
4 likes@Jon Lees you wrote Michael, not Markeis. Not important though haha...is there a video of his dad's statement?
2 likes@Jon Leesyou said Michael McGlocktons dad, it’s Markeis McGlocktons dad
7 likes@Zombie4Skin ah shit must have autocorrected or something
2 likes@Juan Vidaurre it was a quote in an article, I think I just searched for where drejka was now
2 likesVery powerful statement.
4 likes@Sadistic Demon What do you even mean by this
1 like@Sadistic Demon I can’t tell if you’re a troll or not with a screen name like that and with you expressing such a lack of empathy with such conviction
7 likes@Sadistic Demon hope you're joking, everyone just report him
1 likeI hope he doesn't mind if I take that and use it at some point. Hopefully I won't be in that situation, but damn that's good
0 likesImagine being ordered to forgive someone who rape and murder your whole family. You hug and forgive this man, or you arent allowed in to heaven. Sounds like a good god doesnt it?
2 likesTo me it sounds more like the Devil having a little fun, before you stand infront of him.
I understand that going through life, with hatred or revenge serves no one any good. But what i cannot do, with someone who murder my loved ones, is forgive them. Atleast not nilly willy. Because a book commands me to do so.
Cringetianity.
2 likesThe prosecutor says Michale macglockton about 10 times.... I thought Michal was the defandants name ...
0 likesThat was pretty good
0 likesHateful person who attacked a man's hateful father condemning himself to eternal damnation. I'm not religious but this is hilarious.
0 likes@Gunnysmack I'm not. I just hate when people start fights and then cry about the consequences.
0 likes@LL Why? You seem to give me attention. I like it here :)
0 likes@Jon Lees Fortunately, I am not. The country needs to be cleansed.
0 likes@Brandon Rogers True, and that's what people in the YT comments don't seem to understand. Threatening and insulting criminals does not make them better than the criminals. Yet I am labeled as the troll here and the angry, violent YT mob thinks that they are the "good" people. I bet half of them would do the same or even worse if they were in Drejkas position.
0 likes@Cindy Tartt I know. You wanting me to die makes you just as evil as me. But don't worry, that's just human nature. I'm not taking it personally.
0 likes@Hypogonadism Don't do it then?
0 likesI hate it when people without a disability park in disabled spaces, but I wouldn't kill them.
4 likesReplies (3)
Well, if you say that either you didn't watch the video, or you did not understand it.
0 likesI mean you’re right, but disabilities aren’t always visible.
0 likes@Sa Kura luckily in this country, we have disabled badges to help us with that.
0 likesI can only imagine how this case would’ve been if there hadn’t been security footage.
478 likesReplies (25)
Scatmanfan45 they’d be giving him a medal and a parade
64 likes@Daveyhavok832 probably. Pretty disgusting how biases show up without video evidence.
32 likes@Daveyhavok832 doubt it. There were witnesses.
9 likes@Jessica Rich your point being? There were witnesses in Breonna Taylor’s murder and nobody got arrested.
31 likesScarey thought.
1 like@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ shutup
4 likesWithout the CCTV there wouldn’t have been sufficient evidence to prove what actually happened. He would have walked away a free man. Witnesses aren’t as reliable and affective as you’d like to think in cases like this.
14 likes@Daveyhavok832 I mean he does kinda have a point, people aren’t just gonna “forget” that he shot the other person. No matter how much you twist the story there’s not gonna be much room for reason.
1 like@Chel Dorado A-fucking-men Macay.
3 likes@Liz C ironic how you put a swear in the middle of a holy word
0 likes@Typical Yugosuavian well Bigo Bear, that's because I have a foul fucking mouth and somehow Jesus loves me anyway, and you as well for that matter.
2 likes@Liz C you sound like a woman of God
2 likes@Daveyhavok832 what witnesses? People who claim they heard/didn’t hear the police announce themselves? I don’t think that counts as being a witness to the shooting.
0 likes@Kurt Mattox was her boyfriend not in the house at the time? He is a witness to her murder no matter how hard the police attempt to discredit him to save their own asses.
1 like@Daveyhavok832 Him shooting at police upon their entry does not categorize him as a witness since he is directly involved in the incident itself. There were no witnesses
2 likes@Kurt Mattox if you want to maintain a childlike understanding of a very simple word in an attempt to uphold some bullshit definition that is purposefully twisted to shield those in power, I can’t stop you. No sense in arguing with a victim of brainwashing. Regardless of what happened after Breonna Taylor’s murder, the atrocity was witnessed by everyone in that house. Their involvement in it does not mean that they are not witnesses, except perhaps in a court of law. Even then, that is a severely flawed argument. When someone sees something happen, they are a witness. Period.
0 likesNow, you mentioned the neighbors that have all said the police did not announce themselves. These people are witnesses. You will try to convolute things by saying that they only heard but didn’t see. Hence the term “eyewitness.” People are smart. So people came up with different words for similar things. If I say a bench with a blindfold on and the person next to me had an argument with his father and his father murdered him on the spot, am I not a witness to the murder having only heard it? Of course not.
@Daveyhavok832 lets see, Police officers had a warrant to search the apartment. Her boyfriend was a suspected cocaine dealer and his listed home address was hers. (which later turned out to be true, he was arrested for cocaine trafficking) her boyfriend fired at the police first. They returned fire and accidently killed Breonna Taylor. Thats why nobody got arrested.
1 like@Daveyhavok832 You mean the guy who shot at police and was later arrested for Cocaine trafficking. You mean the guy who the search warrant was intended for? YA thats what we call a credible witness.....
1 like@Daveyhavok832 So you think the polilce went in to murder HER but not her boyfriend and because he had no ties to drug dealing? They just did it because WHY? Why? let me guess, he was black. But wait!?!? Why didnt they kill him?
1 likeya your explanation makes alot more sense.
0 likes@Daveyhavok832 Her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, admitted to firing at police as they entered the apartment but claimed he believed the officers were intruders. He allegedly struck Officer Jonathan Mattingly.
1 likeIn the search warrant affidavit filed before the raid of Taylor’s apartment, police said they believed Glover could be keeping drugs and money at her home. During the recorded jail call after the raid, in which Glover said Taylor was "hanging onto my money" for him, he claimed she had about $14,000 – and that he could walk into her home and find it.
"She had the eight I gave her the other day ... and she picked up another six," Glover told an unidentified man
Apparently she bailed Glover out of prison before, who she had dated in the past. They also had evidence, including phone conversations which stated Glover was hiding money with her.
She was interviewed about the homicide of Fernandez Bowman. Ms. Taylor rented the car he was found in. She was dating the victim’s brother’s drug-dealing associate, Jamarcus Glover. The brother is Demarius Bowman.
Ms. Taylor posted a bond for Glover on two occasions. Glover was believed to be involved in very violent crime in the area. Glover was committing crimes in a car registered to Breonna Taylor.
People calling from jail called her phone number 48 times from January 1, 2016, to January 3, 2020. Glover called her 26 times and another felon with drug possession charges, Curtis Palm, called her 7 times.
The Glover car was at Taylor’s house 6 times. It had been tracked numerous times to trap houses but the car was hard to surveil because Glover performed “heat checks.” The detectives had a GPS put on the car. They found that he left her house with USPS packages.
They also discovered that Glover had ties to the narcotics trafficking in Mississippi where he once lived.
They observed Ms. Taylor on February 13th of this year drive Glover to a trap house and wait for him. At one point, she got out of the car in front of one of the trap houses and looked around. Glover got in the car a short while later. They found a large amount of drugs hidden out in back of that property. They also found illicit firearms.
They also found an LG&E bill with Adrian Walker’s name on it.
By February 20th, Glover was using Taylor’s address.
A search warrant was executed in March for Breonna Taylor, and the address. Kenneth Walker was now living at the address.
Wow looks like I did get some facts wrong. It wasnt Her current boyfriends fault at all. Well except for the part where he opened fire on police. That was kind of his fault.
@Daniel G that’s a big problem. I’m against cops killing anybody that doesn’t present an immediate threat. But I don’t work in the media so I’m not going to take the blame for what they choose to cover. Having said that, I’ve seen firsthand how black people can be treated differently by police. Too often, there is no attempt to de-escalate a situation regardless of the race of the person. Too often, police respond to calls that they’re untrained and illequipped to handle. So my problem, as I said before, are when racist dipshits flock to the internet to defend people that are killing other people. I make mistakes at work. But when I make a mistake, nobody is going to die. If I were in a position where that was a possibility, I’d be speaking up. I would be demanding proper training. I wouldn’t want to worry about how I was going to sleep at night. I wouldn’t be walking around with my chest puffed out, acting like my “brothers” are above the law and can do no wrong.
0 likes@Extraordinary ActSofGlasS Google “speaking figuratively meaning” that should help an odiot
0 likes@u.gly_d.uckling But there was evidence, so how do you know what bias would've showed up, had there not been evidence?
0 likesHe would hae probably walked, sadly, in todays climate and how things are.
0 likesIt baffles me how little understanding he had of the severity of his situation, it seems like he thought that he would walk out of there and be celebrated as a hero
858 likesReplies (39)
If this took place in 1949 there would have been a parade in his honor 😂
59 likesYt Sup. Don't feel very superior in jail I'm sure ehehhhahhaa
6 likesUnfortunately a lot of people who conceal carry think they would be celebrated in this situation
8 likes🇿🇦
1 like@electrojones lmaooo 😂😂 u got other people triggered too 💀
14 likes@Po Al and rightfully so.
1 likeFox News was celebrating him as a hero so there’s that
6 likes@I Review Things Good tbh
0 likesHe thought that privilege was going to save him.
5 likes@Shay Love if he had privileges then he would have been saved no? I don't think you grasp what a privilege is.
4 likes@Ruben Leavell wrong, the only reason privilege didn't save him this time because the video told the true story.
9 likes@Shay Love so he doesn't have privileges??? Haha dude look up the definition of a privilege.
1 likeHe DID walk out like a hero that day, only protests brought charges had there been no video he'd be free today.
0 likesHow is he not a hero?
0 likes@Enrico Pallazzo He murdered a man that was backing away from him.
6 likesEver since Trayvon martin these clowns got real confident.
5 likes@Enrico Pallazzo Are you not listening to JCS & the interrogation? Sheesh!
1 like@Cesare Cesare wtf are you trying to convey? Use English man
0 likes@Don't watch CNN ! Fake News ! Nah, he’d still be in prison.
0 likesyup that was the plan
0 likesGeorge Zimmerman was portrayed as a hero by conservative media, so I guess he thought he would be too
1 like@Cesare Cesare wtf language was that
0 likes@RLTW ok since he refuses to return and explain himself wtf did the guy hes responding to mean
0 likesHe probably still is hailed as a hero to his like minded friends and family and would be to all of America if it weren't for the video cameras that caught it.
0 likes@Cesare Cesare hey republican, could you give me the freedom of being able to understand the fuck you said?
2 likesi wonder whyyyyyyy he thought that? thats SO strange
0 likesalso before someone calls me stupid, that was sarcasm
0 likes@gabrielle roberts But that guy put his hands on him first tho
0 likes@Makima Tier 3 Sub He pushed him to put distance between his family and a strange man yelling at them. Would you be fine with some strange man screaming at your wife and children?
0 likesA gunshot is not an equal response to a shove. He hesitated and waited until the deceased was BACKING AWAY FROM HIM (meaning he was no longer a threat) when he pulled the trigger. That’s why he’s in prison today.
@gabrielle roberts No i won’t be fine with that but at the same time i ain’t letting anybody touch me and getaway with it scotfree either. Now where i live we don’t carry guns like in america but some of us keep knives on us just incase for instances like this. Nobody should be allowed to get their hands on anyone else no matter what reason. I’m not siding with the guy in the video either because he is obviously very dumb for not getting a good lawyer for this
0 likes@Makima Tier 3 Sub And would you have stabbed this man as he was backing away from you after you produced whatever weapon you’d be carrying? Or would you realize the threat had passed? And no, a good lawyer wouldn’t have gotten him off. He screwed up because he’s BEEN wanting to use his gun and jumped at the opportunity to fire at someone that was retreating. He was going to prison whether he had the best lawyer in the country or not.
0 likes@gabrielle roberts actually any good lawyer could have gotten him off
0 likes@Makima Tier 3 Sub I wouldn’t say he caused it. Drejka parked illegally to go confront someone else about being in an handicapped space unnecessarily. THAT’S what caused this. Who gets in a screaming match with someone over a parking space (that he didn’t need himself, mind you) when simply telling them, “hey, you shouldn’t do that if you don’t need this spot” then moving along would suffice? I’m not enabling the victim here… he’s dead. I’m placing blame on the one that TOOK A LIFE over a shove.
0 likes@Shiloh Wehrmacht Absolutely not, not only given the circumstances of this case, but all relevant past encounters he’s had on the road or in parking lots. As the narrator pointed out, Drejka had pulled this same gun on two men and two women (one with children in her vehicle) on four separate occasions, prior to killing this young father. He was itching to use it.
0 likes@gabrielle roberts any good attorney would ensure none of those prior incidents could be brought up during the trial (its prejudicial evidence not directly relevant to the case and doesnt directly show his state of mind either)
0 likes@Shiloh Wehrmacht They could argue that it’s prejudicial, but since he’d confronted at least one other person at that store over that same space AND threatened to shoot him, that would likely be allowed in and would directly show a pattern of behavior that preceded the fatal shooting. Drejka was a ticking time bomb. Unfortunately for this young father, Drejka finally thought he was justified to use lethal force. A jury of his peers disagreed, thankfully.
0 likes@Shiloh Wehrmacht Also, if the defense accidentally opens the door for prosecutors (claiming Drejka was just an easy going guy trying to “better society,” as they did) to bring forth character witnesses as well as those who’d been confronted by Drejka in a particularly hostile manner, the judge would have no choice but to let that evidence against him in.
0 likes@gabrielle roberts thats a mostly fair argumemt but Ive seen good lawyers get all evidence the other side thrown out by questioning officers and getting one link in the evidenciary chain to be labeled questionable then damnable
0 likes@Shiloh Wehrmacht I’ve seen it and done it before as well, but I don’t think it would have been so easy in this case. I would have encouraged him to take a plea, but, if I recall correctly, Drejka wasn’t offered one.
0 likesWhat a character lol, this guy is talking to the police like he’s part of the team smh
1839 likesReplies (52)
Exactly what I said! He is such a clown.
24 likesIn his distorted mind, he thinks he is. He just has his “us” vs “them” mixed up.
27 likesHe is...a confident, experienced and law-abiding gun owner...I'm very proud that he used his gun in SYG self defense regardless of the injustice he was the victim of.
1 like@Sabrason if he was experienced he would not be in prison right now
19 likes@MarvNoGood I mean, he could be experienced and delusional, that is a possibility
2 likes@Sabrason you need to read over it again because Drekja did not even see the attack coming to believe he was in any kind of danger. When Drekja saw his attacker he was already on the ground pulling out his weapon and his attacker immediately retreated even before Drekja pulled his weapon. So how is it a justified shooting when he was no longer in danger? You can’t just go around shooting people because you were shoved
42 likes@MarvNoGood Your comment proves what a dunce you are. Drekja didn't think he was in danger BEFORE the attack, he reasonably believed he was in danger AFTER the attack -- as any reasonable person would after being violently shoved to the ground and injured like he was -- which justified lethal force with a gun particularly since McGlockton continued towards him for 2-3 steps AFTER the push and only slightly turned to the right once the gun was pulled but said nothing. You call that slight partial turn a "retreat" but I would argue that in that instant there was no way for Drejka to know if that was a half-hearted/reluctant "retreat" or if McGlockton was evading and repositioning to draw his own weapon so Drejka correctly fired ONE bullet to neutralize the threat and prevent further bodily harm to himself = clear cut, textbook SYG. Look it up. You are NOT required to wait for a violent aggressor to CONTINUE to inflict bodily harm more than once before you use lethal force. This is not difficult to understand if you understand the SYG law which states that if you reasonably feel your life is in danger or bodily harm is imminent you can use lethal force. Period. End of discussion. You say "you can't go around shooting people because you were shoved" but the SYG law says otherwise in certain instances and I'd add that you can't go around laying hands on people and violently pushing people to the ground and not expect a defensive response. It's that simple.
3 likes@Sabrason by that logic, you can’t go around antagonizing/yelling at people and playing vigilante just because people parked in the wrong spot. McGlockton could have argued that he had no way of knowing if Drejka was going to cause the mother of his children bodily harm as the man aggressively yells at her over a parking spot. I can’t stand able bodied people who park handicapped parking spots either but it’s not my job to correct that behavior. Report it to the property authority and move on with life.
36 likesAlso, you’ve missed a very clear indicator that you’re not as law savvy as you’d like to believe. The SYG law states that you can meet force with force (including deadly force) if you REASONABLY feel your life is in danger. That’s the key word and that one word is why this man was arrested and later found guilty. By his own admission, he thought he would be kicked - not killed. Kicked. And if he thought the kick was enough to have killed him then he would have phrased it that way. Given how forthcoming Drejka was with proving justification for his actions, if he genuinely mistook McGlockton pivoting to leave for reaching for his own gun then he would have said as much. Not once did he say he feared McGlockton had a gun despite the officers continuously providing him with the opportunity to do so.
@Sabrason Lol, is there Internet in prison, Mr. Dreyka?
23 likes@Sabrason Nah, I dont agree. That shit wasnt right whatsoever.
11 likes@Sabrason your bias is clouding your reading comprehension and you’re judgement.
9 likes@Painted Collection thank you for writing this out for @sabrason and possibly saving his life/someone else’s life.
8 likesjermey dewitte
1 likelol, that's because, in a way, he is.
0 likes@Sabrason - Aw shucks. Egg on my face, man. I’m so sorry. I didn’t realize I was talking to an expert. I hear Drejka is looking to appeal. You should offer your expert legal services. He’ll be free in no time.
18 likesEvery time he uses what he perceives to be police terminology or jargon I want to cut my ears off.
8 likes@Sabrason "Like every other anti-white racist in here with an afrocentric agenda, you have little if any understanding of the SYG law"
19 likesYou are showing zero integrity for discourse with speak like that. It makes your bias and views see-through, especially after laying out several chapters of pseudo facts which only you find convincing.
@Sabrason Pal, McG obviously retreated after he saw the gun, never reached towards his pocket or any place he could've held the weapon. He was backing the f away from that situation sooo, no, no way the shooting was justified. These are clear facts you can see from the recording, no matter how much you try to twist the situation.
8 likes@Painted Collection I'm certainly no expert (although still A LOT brighter than you) but, again, per the defense team, there' are legal experts around the country who agree that is was a justified use of SYG so all of you amateur armchair attorneys should consider some self-reflection as to why you disagree with those experts when the SYG law is quite clear. You're free to contact any one of those experts including Drejka's defense attorneys and I'm sure they'd be happy to explain it to you also.
1 like@Sabrason Whaaaa?! A convict’s defense team says they’re innocent?! Holy crow! That’s certainly a new one. That means there’s a whoooole lot of people who should be set free right away. We should let someone know. But wait... what about all the legal expects who say Drejka WASN’T justified in his actions? Hmmm. Guess we’ll just pretend they don’t exist. Makes sense to me. You’re a genius!
10 likes@Sabrason - That turn around might have worked if I had been trying to claim people weren’t outraged by a white dude killing a black dude. They were outraged by it. So what? That doesn’t make RoboCop wannabe any less guilty of shooting a man who was retreating away from him. Anyone who is that that jumpy shouldn’t carry.
5 likesBut I’ll entertain your silly game one last time. A black guy starts screaming at a white woman for parking in a handicap spot. Her white husband comes out and shoves the black man away from her. Black man pulls a gun, the white man starts to retreat but black man shoots anyway and the white man dies in front of his children. You think the black shooter wouldn’t have been charged? You think the black shooter wouldn’t have gone to prison? Not only would the black shooter have gone to prison but he would have deserved it. I get the feeling you wouldn’t be over here crying about the injustice of it all had the races been reversed but I hope I’m wrong. Either way, I think I’ve had my share of entertaining your delusional confirmation bias. Cheers bud.
@Painted Collection I have no need to read the entirety of your nonsense b/c I don't agree with your false premise that Drejka KNEW in a split second of time that McGlockton was "retreating."
0 likes@Lobo Lara Yes, yes it does and if you understood the SYG law you would know that. "Possibly getting beat because you were an asshole justifies a kill? = fear of imminent bodily harm = justifies lethal force. Certainly no "free license to kill" but it is a license to defend oneself from imminent bodily harm or fear of death which is perfectly legitimate and justified. Innocent citizens should not be defenseless victims to criminals with no legal ability to defend themselves by whatever means necessary.
1 like@Sabrason how is getting pushed to the ground a deadly force? this man was NEVER in danger of death and you can see that clearly in the tapes. you assume you’re the only one who knows the law and everyone else is stupid, but the truth is that you’re grasping at straws and not even reading people’s answers because you’re trying to cover up your own idiocy. there’s a reason drejka is in prison! i don’t see how a youtube comment from someone who can’t find anything better to do with their life than pretend law in youtube comments is going to change that.
6 likes@Sabrason im sorry but no. He was simply shoved not punched, stabbed or held by the throat he was shoved theres no reason anyone should be pulling a weapon on a person that simply shoved them and didnt keep going towards them especially since he was the one that started the altercation. And mister trigger happy also had a pretty long time to realize that the “agressor” wasnt really trying to attack him anymore
3 likesA lot of these self designated "Neighborhood Watch" fantasy policemen waiting to murder someone
1 like@clara Clara, you're not getting it because you don't understand the SYG law. In danger of death is NOT the only circumstance that the law allows deadly force to be used for. It's also imminent bodily harm (look it up and keep reading it) which Drejka was reasonably in fear of since he was ALREADY harmed once by McGlockton. That's why the legal experts agree that it was a justified shooting. Somebody violently pushes you off your feet out of nowhere most normal people would fear further bodily harm which is a reasonable and rational fear in that situation. Some of you seem to want to the shoot messenger when in reality you just don't agree with the SYG law and apparently want victims to remain defenseless after being assaulted.
1 like@Jeff Au_blum Well, you have a right to disagree with the SYG law but being violently "shoved" to the ground injuring an arm would make most reasonable/rational people fear further bodily harm which justifies deadly force = SYG. It's that simple. Let's be clear that McGlockton started the physical altercation and committed the first illegal act by laying hands on Drejka and nobody has a right to get physical b/c of a verbal confrontation...NOBODY. LOL...Drejka "had a pretty long time" to realize that an aggressive/hostile drug addict with a history of assault wasn't going to attack him AGAIN???......what do you call a long time??? He had maybe 1-2 seconds to make a decision while McGlockton was repositioning to do god knows what else in that instant. He could've been retreating, getting ready to attack again, pull his own firearm or other weapon...no way for Drejka or anybody else to know in that quick instant. That's why it was a justified shooting per legal experts.
2 likes@MarvNoGood I'd say if the judge didn't want to punish him for being a wannabe parking lot cop and if the jury wasn't afraid of retaliation and violence in the streets had they found him innocent he wouldn't be in prison right now. It was another anti-white racially-motivated injustice.
1 like@Ítalo Brito I realize that. I'm far too intelligent for you to understand the basic concepts that I'm explaining in clear and thoughtful detail.
1 likebc he white
1 like2 things come to mind: (1) Boomer (2) Privileged
1 like@Sabrason I don't really remember exactly what Twain said about the idiot, but all I know is that I'm not gonna waste my time in a yt chat fight.
1 like@Sabrason crybaby
1 like@Sabrason ANTI WHITE??? AFROCENTRIC??? BYEEE i am not arguing with you again it is clear that you have issues and that is not my problem goodbye
4 likesReal life Dwight from the office
3 likes@Zak Potato Because you can't, my logic is undeniable so you've reached the end of any weak attempt you made to argue against it. SYG law is SYG law.
0 likes@clara That's what I thought, Clara...and nobody is arguing here...we're all just chatting and discussing differing opinions but, like many in here, your parents did a horrendous job raising you so you can't handle a differing opinion calmly and either get triggered into rage or you refuse to communicate and run away. I get it.
1 like@yerro oh look.. another non American passing judgement on American law and firearms like anyone cares what you think!
0 likes@Sabrason WTF……….”a confident, experienced and law abiding gun owner”….are you serious?? He was a gun owner, he had a responsibility to avoid confrontations including any other situation which might require him to use his gun. Everyone around him warned him about his unacceptable behaviour. He was told to stop confronting and harassing people. So what does he do? He decides to carry his gun next time he harasses people. This guy is dumb! He went out of his way to confront the lady. This is not an isolated incident. Others testified in court that Drejka made threats to use his gun and kill. He should not have been given a concealed weapon permit. Like the judge said “believe your eyes” he lied to the police, not realising the entire incident was on cctv. He deserves to rot in prison. He shot and killed a man over a car parking incident….seriously…is that was America is reduced to….killing each other over a car park! He did not have either the right or the authority to confront and harass people over a car parking infringement. He most likely stalked the car park, waiting for his victim. This guy most likely has mental health issues. No one in their right mind would get involved in this situation. The judge summed it up perfectly, Drejka is a wannabe cop. Smile Drejka, you are on candid camera…..haha
1 like@Sabrason you intelligent, Sabrason? Haha…you are delusional….
0 likes@Sabrason two and a half seconds is not a “split second” Drejka had sufficient time to make a reasonable decision….gotta love how defendants choose to wear glasses in court…..must think it gives them credibility…….ha ha ha ha……only in America can you be killed over a car park infringement!
0 likesI'd say that him getting convicted for this would set precedent that this wasn't in the scope of SYG law. But. What do I know.
0 likes@LJ B clearly what I think is true, if there's people as entitled as you who think people should be allowed to carry weapons that can kill in an instant.
0 likes@LJ B also, I live in America currently lmao. I don't want to consider myself an American tho cuz of people like you
0 likes@yerro "clearly what I think is true"
0 likesLol. Omg I can't stop laughing at that ridiculous statement
@Sabrason bro if it was justified why tf was he found guilty?
0 likes@Acedman190 Bro, it's very simple: because the criminal justice system has become politicized and controlled by the angry, afrocentric left so jurors are afraid of retaliation and local government officials are afraid of leftard rioting and looting in the streets. That's why.
0 likes@clara Good choice. You're vastly overmatched.
0 likes@Guy Dude Is yours?
0 likes@Light Dud Exactly, what do you know??
0 likes@Gabriel T Yes, a confident, experienced gun owner. A wannabe cop for sure, but my point remains the same. There are 300 million guns in America owned by over 100 million law-abiding gun owners including me. Get use to it.
0 likesthe defense lawyer is a joke
0 likesHis whole argument was that there was a woman parked in a handicapped spot when she shouldn't have been.
1307 likesSo, in order to confront her, he parks ILLEGALLY next to her. Hypocrite
Replies (41)
@Peter Brown Police are trained and employed to determine and use the best strategy and also reasonable responses. They wouldn't park illegally to confront someone, who was causing no danger to the public or herself
57 likes@Peter Brown comparing a murderer to a authorised police officer, are we? 😐
85 likes@Peter Brown ha?
0 likes@Pranav Limaye no
0 likesIf that was all he did, he wouldn't be getting interrogated. He thinks he's a normal, average guy?! Thank God he is not. He most definitely is racist, in my opinion, but whether his hatred stems from that, or not, this man should not be freed. The man who was shot, did not deal with the situation very well, but he wasn't pointing a gun at the defendant!
25 likesI do feel that the gun laws in the United States, are so out dated.
11 likesI know the second amendment is like a religious deity to some Americans, but the intellect and training needed to responsibly own a firearm is seldom attained. And as we know there are far too many deaths because ordinary citizens use their firearms without assessing the situation and drawing on adequate professional training!
@Bendygedy 100%
5 likesYou should be required training even if you know how to handle a weapon.
There should also be restrictions on what weapons a normal citizen is able to have.
There's no need for us to have AK-47's for self-defense.
In Australia, they have guns. But they do extensive research and background checks on the purchaser and take many other precautions.
And guess what, there are no school shootings over there even though they have guns.
@Sheila Hammond
1 likeBut would he be pushed over if he was black though?
@Buster Scruggs cool
1 like@Buster Scruggs so edgy bro
5 likesWell if you take the spot without a permit and refuse to move im likely to park behind you and than you can wait to leave.
2 likes@Simon Black I have no clue what you’re talking about.
0 likes@hi thisthers I was certain it was you who stated earlier that you so no reason to allow Citizens firearms such Ak47s and also, am I confusing you with a different person, or did you make a comment about people who hold the 2nd amendment sacred treat it almost like a religion?
1 like@hi thisthers I might owe you an apology.
0 likes@hi thisthers okay, the guy before you made the religious comment, and you talked about Australia, yes?
0 likes@Simon Black I can't remember. I commented a month ago.
1 likeBut, I do believe that assault rifles are not necessary for regular citizens.
@Simon Black I don't believe I brought race into it! The shooter very well may have been a racist. One thing is for sure, that being pushed doesn't warrant murder or manslaughter. That man was deranged. I feel so sorry for all the victims loved ones. His wife, his children, his family and friends, and him for losing his life.
2 likes@Sheila Hammond perhaps you should read your own comment.
1 like@hi thisthers this is why having views about something without information is dangerous.
2 likesPlease, I beg you, define assault weapon.
@Sheila Hammond how I feel about the loss of a life, is irrelevant about my 2nd amendment right. I think it was Fort Henry? An entire fleet of British ships had their cannons and weapons trained on the American flag. The British Admiral commanded the troops (Americans soldiers) take down that flag, or we will obliterate it. Our boys refused. For hours into the night, they fired on Fort Henry and the flag. At times it would disappear in the smoke, reappear standing, but on an angle. The flag stayed up all night. In the morning, it became visible why the flag couldn't be shot down. Because every time it was, another soldier came out to hold that flag up. The pile of dead soldiers is why the flag couldn't be shot down. I get choked up every time I think about that. I can never repay those brave men. But I will be damned if I don't fight for what they stood for. Freedom is everyone's job, responsibility. Not just some guy 250 years ago.
1 like@Simon Black If you do not know what an assault rifle is, then I can't participate in this conversation with you.
0 likes@Simon Black I think that you're responding to the wrong person.
1 likeYou're getting worked up over nothing.
@hi thisthers I never understood why people think they know what another person's emotional state is. Why is that even part of your comments?
1 likeOkay, the original comment comes from that "Benygendy" person who claims the 2nd amendment is out dated. Then, YOU , yes, YOU replied by stating there should be restrictions, and people don't need AK47S. you said that. I'm responding to that.
@Simon Black Yes. What’s your point?
0 likes@hi thisthers I'll answer your question. Then answer mine.
1 likeMy point is, too many people have a point of view about the 2nd amendment, but their point of view has no factual information, and that is dangerous.
I can, and already have elaborated on that.
QUESTION: Can you provide a definition of assault rifle, or admit that you didn't understand the phrase in the first place?
@Simon Black oh dear you are upset.
1 likeFirst of all I have a point of view, which if you don’t like is fine by me.
Second, you are allowed guns,and I didn’t say they should be taken away.
Third, I don’t see the problem in making people safer in the use of firearms, through education, and the need to address any problems by people who are a bit unhinged. Or stupid for that matter!
Fourth you can spot the stupid and the unhinged by the way they highlight things in block capitals ,as if shouting.
Fifth , the government here doesn’t execute anybody. And we don’t carry guns.
Sixth 🇬🇧
@hi thisthers Define assault rifle then.
0 likes@Stephanie folks, we have one of those special ones here.
1 likeFIRST OF ALL, I WAS BORN AND RAISED IN THE ACTUAL WORLD, NOT CYBER FLAKE LAND. THIS ISN'T ME SCREAMING, I DO THIS FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE A HARD TIME FOCUSING ON WHAT THEY SAY, MUCH LESS ME.
WHAT DO I MEAN?
YOU NOW CLAIM YOU DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT GUNS BEING TAKEN AWAY .
BUT A FEW COMMENTS AGO?
"I DON'T THINK PEOPLE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO OWN AK47S. IT WORKED OUT GOOD IN AUSTRALIA "
YOU MEAN WHERE THEY TOOK AWAY THE GUNS FROM PEOPLE?
oh brother.
Sigh...
When people can't keep track of what I say, I can understand that.
But when they don't bother to pay attention to their own words? I start scratching my head wondering why I bothered to listen.
WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU ASKING ME TO DEFINE AN ASSAULT RIFLE?
THERE'S NO SUCH THING?!?!
YOU ARE THE PERSON WHO USED THAT SILLY, CARTOON CHARACTER WORD.
TELL ME, IF YOU SEE A RABBIT, DO YOU THINK YOU'RE LOOKING AT BUGS BUNNY?
@Bendygedy and oh brother, do you read like every third word out of a sentence?
1 likeI didn't say every country, I said most countries with a military. Tell you what, want to look like really bad if I give you the long list of countries that did?
@Simon Black I think you’re responding to the wrong person. I wasn’t asking you.
1 like@Stephanie yep, I'm the bozo on the cheese buss for sure.
0 likes@Stephanie Google it?
0 likes@Djdj Hsjsjs pretty much haha
0 likesExcept that it wasn't illegal parking if it's private property. :)
0 likesHandicapped spots are illegal by the law, parking in two spots, etc, isn't illegal on private property (and why you don't get a ticket from them). For example, in a WalMart or a quick-e-mart.
@Rundvelt Of course! Let’s justify him shooting at someone over parking!
0 likes@Mylesa Stinnette The black man didn’t even park there. That was another woman.
1 likeAnd regardless of illegal parking, no one deserves to be shot at.
hi thisthers I totally agree with you. I hate guns and in Florida, they carry them around like chapstick. Luckily where I live it’s against the law. The guy was definitely wrong for taking that man’s life. I am a black disabled woman and it’s highly irritating to see someone in a handicap parking spot who should not be there. The suspect had other choices. I have had cars ticketed and towed because of a spot I needed. I just think that in today’s crazy world with so many angry people in the US, the least you can do is not park in handicap spots. I am black and I find where I live that it’s always blacks that I encounter parking wrongfully. That’s all I am trying to say.
0 likes@Buster Scruggs No one thinks you’re funny.
0 likes@Mylesa Stinnette Exactly!
0 likesI agree with you 100%
We need more restrictions on guns for everyone's safety
Lulu bugz I don't think he was joking
0 likesYeah then he tells a cop without a lawyer present that it's his pet peev and that he takes " precautions " when confronting people !
0 likes"Neutralize eminent threat" is he in a fucking action movie or something? xD
2 likesHe's retired lol
0 likes“Is there anything you would change about that day?”
1824 likes“Not off the top of my head”
Guess it was a pretty good day for him then
Replies (17)
I mean, in the end, she did move her car.
59 likesMission accomplished....?
i think hes afraid of being misunderstood and smeared
9 likes“I’ve had lots of time to think” “no not off the top of my head”
21 likesI mean saying "yes I wouldn't have shot him" would have been an exceptionally bad choice for him, because it would essentially have him admit that shooting was a mistake and that he should be punished.
29 likes@wesb2410 he could just say I wish no one died
36 likes38:50
1 like@wesb2410 You are as wrong about the concept of self-defence as the murderer in this video. There should be no doubt in any sane mind that it was a mistake to shoot him. The jury is not there to determine if it was "good to shoot him" as it is obvious to everyone on court that it was a mistake- the man bleeded to death in front of his children over a parking lot argument... The only question is if he was threatened enough to justify his mistake of shooting him. To regret the loss of life would only do him good.
8 likes@Guy Owl Sure but that's a bit hard to defend if you so obviously shot someone with the intent to kill though.
1 like@wesb2410 you can’t prove that his intent was to kill. Nobody could, that’s why he was charged with manslaughter and not murder.
2 likesNo, it would be a legal trap
0 likes@wesb2410 Not sure why that would even be a thought. The obvious answer for someone who had to kill in self defense and isnt a psychopath is "I would change whatever I could so that a man didn't have to die."
1 like@Jordan Martin That's not what manslaughter and murder are. Manslaughter is killing someone intentionally and unjustly without thinking about it beforehand. Murder is carrying out a plan to kill someone.
2 likes@lucid hominid It most definitely wasn't self defense.
1 like@Soleilune Doesn't matter what should happen. He's not going to sit up there and confess to fucking up before the trial. Nobody would, that would be fucking stupid.
1 likeCould have gone with “not confronting a family that wasn’t doing anything to me personally”
0 likes@Gachabrain No you.
1 like@atheistmecca Clearly. The point is that even if it was self defense, he's clearly fine with having a man's death on his hands. It also makes it even more difficult to believe that he thought his life was actually in danger because if he did, you would at least expect that he would regret letting himself end up in that position. I think this all makes it pretty clear that he had been wanting a chance to shoot and kill someone for awhile and legit thought this was his chance to get away with it.
0 likesEveryone who ever met this guy must have chills running up their spine.. knowing that this guy was on a hair trigger everyday of his life
285 likesReplies (4)
I've known people like this who just snapped one day, it's scary.
4 likesLots of people are like that, unfortunately, looking for any reason to start possible argument. I will park on a regular spot today for sure.
5 likes@ezra cramer so true
1 likeThat’s what he would want. The Punk.
0 likesthis guy pisses me off. hopefully he rots in prison.
1 likeReplies (1)
@Herbert West thank you for informing me. glad karma caught up to him.
1 likeAs someone who is actually disabled, and has the right to use disabled parking, and who rarely does so, I too have a pet peeve with people using disabled parking.
509 likesHowever, first off, I am not a parking enforcement officer, and two, I sometimes forget to put my placard on the mirror. I am an amputee and only use disabled parking if I can't use my prosthesis or I am hurting that day. It blocks my view so I have to take it down to drive.
Unless it's your job to enforce the law, don't. Call the police, take a picture of the violator and pass it to the police, but don't confront people.
People who use disabled parking illegally are entitles assholes. You are very likely to find yourself in a fight. It's a very petty thing to get in a fight about.
Even if you know you can hold your own in a fight, the other party could be armed or just a better fighter than you are.
No one is going to think you a hero for telling off assholes.
Replies (47)
I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said, these kinds of incidents wouldn't be so common if people would just stop policing each other like this.
22 likesin San Francisco we have a problem with people breaking into apartment complexes and folks in the buildings feel the need to police instead of following what most apartments tell residents which is to report suspicious activities to police or security but they don't listen, then you have to hear about it in the news.
@jairtzinio I used to own a sporty little 4X4. I once parked in disabled parking because I wasn't wearing my leg. I got out, standing on one foot, but before I was able to grab my crutches this guy got in my face and started yelling at me.
19 likesI just looked down and asked, "Isn't having just one foot considered a "disability?"
This happened in Fairfield, by the way. But now I live in Oregon. I grew up in Fairfield.
I have very steady balance on one foot, because I lost my leg when I was just 3 years old.
I bet the lady is still parking in handicapped spots
9 likes@Rex Arms Crypto i wouldnt doubt that, some people never learn
5 likes@Eric Taylor Great comment . It's just not worth the hassle . Marquis should've learned to count till ten also though, the way he immediately pushed Drejka to the ground , and kept towering over him.
12 likesAnother driver saw Drejka going for a gun and ran while Marquis kept hanging around for over a second, which was an eternity in this situation ......2:23
i once was so exhausted after a 14 hour shift i parked unknowingly in a handicapped space, came out to.a police officer who questioned my morality and tried to shame me, and with my sincere response saying i had no idea he said yeah right and i got a ticket.
1 like@PaulLonden And how would you respond if you saw someone yelling at your wife?
17 likesIs Marquis suppose to just bow down and say "Yes massa, whatever you say. I's just the dumb nigga here."?
Marquis was not the aggressor, the white guy was the aggressor, and that is why he was convicted.
He had EVERY right to push the guy down. In fact, had Marquis been armed and pulled his gun out to shoot the black guy, THAT would have been ruled self deference.
I grant you, the lady was wrong parking in disabled parking, but that was a matter for parking enforcement. It's not even a traffic infraction.
The guy was wrong to say anything at all.
@Eric Taylor .... I probably wrongly got out of your comment , that it's not worth the misery to stand on your immediate rights , which might result in disaster. Both sides in this case blundered. It's obvious ofcourse Drejka is guilty of (premeditated ) manslaughter.
2 likes@Eric Taylor you dont need to insert racist ideology into this situation. And your plainly wrong when you say this man was the aggressor. He was pushed down after being physically dominated by a larger man. I disagree with this man being a busy body and confronting theses folks parked in the handicapped spot, nor do i condone him shooting the other man. But he clearly reacted. Wrongly to the other mans aggression.
9 likesI believe she did that because she was in the car. She probably would have moved if someone needed the space.
3 likes@Scorpio83 I doubt it. Also, it is still illegal and rude to use a disabled space if you don't need it.
7 likes@The Human Journey You deserved to get a ticket, even though it was a mistake.
2 likesMost people can be motivated to be careful not to do something like that by mistake. Others require more motivation.
If you made a mistake, fine, pay the fine and be more careful next time.
@C. J. Lau You clearly didn't read my comment properly, otherwise you would understand why I used "racist ideology"
5 likesHe was pushed down after verbally assaulting someone's wife. Are you telling me you would not attack someone who was attacking your wife?
@anis sofea He carried a gun for the wrong reason. He carried a gun so he could have the confidence to confront others.
7 likesHe said as much in this video.
@ilaDali What case do you think I'm trying to make here?
2 likesTo be clear, my case here is, one should not confront others over minor things like this unless it's your job to do so.
I think there’s an app where people can send in pics of someone using a handicapped spot when they shouldn’t be, bc honestly cops don’t want to be bothered with that stuff, but also people need to not be using the spot if they don’t need it.
0 likesC. J. Lau dude was screaming at a woman that was by herself. That’s pretty aggressive
3 likes@srcworm She wasn't by herself. She had her kids with her.
2 likes@srcworm I agree.
0 likesmore people need to write a paragraph like this way easier to read
1 likeAnd they had 3 kids, like if anyone was to use a handicap spot it would be them
0 likesI ABSOLUTELY agree with everything you said and only wished that Marquis hadn't resort to "pushing" someone when he could've easily just talked or asked Drejka "what's the problem" and not to scream at his wife with their kids present. Had Marquis not chosen violent over staying cool and calmly talking to Drejka while resolving the situation...Marquis could've gone home with his life and family that day...Smh
4 likesPeople who choose to deal everyday's problems with "violent" will always get more "violent problems" in return. Two wrongs WILL NEVER make a right! So, had these two hot headed idiots kept their "cool" on that day...they could've enjoy the rest of their lives with their loved ones. Such USELESS idiots & morons of the world...lol smh
Educated and reasonable people DO NOT use violent to resolve situations in life...
"Sometimes you have to be a lion so you can be a lamb that you really are" great saying from Dave Chappelle's mom to him as a teenager. Means a person has to learn to talk their point across strongly so they can live a life not involved in physicality.
@Google User I do agree, but for the "Educated and reasonable people DO NOT use violent to resolve situations in life"
0 likesI would drop the "educated" part of the statement.
You can be uneducated and responsible, while an educated person can be irresponsible and a hot head.
I am not "officially" educated (I have no degree) but I still know things and I consider myself fairly responsible.
At the same time you have a guy like Trump, who is said to be educated and he does have a degree, but he is still ignorant and irresponsible.
I agree that Marquis should have got in the guy's face before pushing him, but he was not the aggressor, and he was backing off when the gun came out.
You can't put yourself in this situation, then claim self deference.
Even if you have a permit to carry, and the situation is 100% self deference, if you use your gun it will cost you at least $10000 because even if you are 100% justified you are going to get sued, and there will be an extensive investigation if a life is lost.
This guy got a gun so he could have the confidence to be aggressive with others. He was looking for an excuse to use the gun.
@Eric Taylor Yes, while I agree that Drejka was definitely "trigger happy" and being very aggressive with his belief. Marquis acting like a "thug" with violent (which escalated the bad situation real quick) then, he's going to be met with violent in returned. Both are at equal FAULTS and should've choose better...be better as human beings. Neither of these idiots were ever "right" in their own reactions or caused.
4 likes@Google User Well, I think Marquis had the right to defend his family, and his over aggressive attitude got him killed, had he survived, would he have been charged with assault?
1 likeIs the murder charge against Drejka appropriate?
I think it should be yes to both questions.
@Eric Taylor Listen man, you really need to let this go and admit that "it is what it is". Both of these idiots are clearly in the wrong on ALL of their actions which have lead to their now "really bad" out comes...like i said before. Two wrongs don't make a right. Neither one of them were "right" in their own actions...PERIOD! Smh
2 likes@Google User And what part of my comment makes you think I don't agree with that?
1 likeBesides the "It is what it is" comment, yes, both of these guys were wrong. But this guy was looking for a situation where he could have the opportunity to shoot someone. This is why he was convicted of murder.
@Eric Taylor Fairfield, CA? Next to Napa?
0 likes@Maryflor Frias Not exactly "next to" but close enough.
0 likesI lost my right leg in 2014 at age 26 so I understand and agree with you
1 likeThere was a case in the UK where a lady and her husband parked in a disabled bay of a supermarket. They had gone inside but forgotten their bags? and so the husband had came back out to get them from the car. While at the car he was verbally attacked by a male in a vehicle in the parking lot. The male accused the husband of not being disabled or needing the blue badge (needed to park in a disabled bay). He continued to attack the husband and then got out the car and punched the husband killing him. Whilst in custody the male was questioned and he alluded to the catalyst of the argument being that the husband didn't have the right to park there because he had no visible disabilities, then the police informed him that he was in fact shopping with his wife and that it was her that was disabled. It was all captured on CCTV and the interview too, all available to watch online. I think it's called 'One punch kill' or something along those lines. A tragic lesson of minding your own business
1 like@T3ddySpaghetti To kill over a parking violation is just stupid.
1 likeAlso, not all disabilities are visible.
I walk into the store to get an electric cart for my elderly neighbor to use, then I put it back after she is done shopping.
If anyone ever asks, I just explain what I'm doing. It's never a problem.
“A Wise man told me don’t argue with fools cause people from a distance can’t tell who is who.”
1 like@Eric Taylor yeah I was just making sure we were talking about the same Fairfield... not many people r from here
0 likes@Maryflor Frias How is Fairfield these days. I've been living in Oregon for 15 years.
0 likesThere are several celebrities from Fairfield, including some who went to my high school (Fairfield High).
When I was their there was only 2 highs schools. Armijo and Fairfield. Now I think there are 5.
@Eric Taylor Pushing someone is assault. He would've been charged too if he didn't die.
1 like@I R Putting your hands on anyone in an unwelcome way is assault.
0 likesHowever, in that case, he could have argued he was defending his family against an aggressor.
In this case, I'm not sure he would have been successful.
The reason the shooter's self deference argument failed was HE WAS THE AGGRESSOR
@Eric Taylor How was he the initial aggressor when he only verbally argued, until being assaulted by the person coming out of the store? Being an asshole doesn't automatically make you the aggressor.
1 like@I R Did you bother reading my comment?
0 likesI said the pusher could argue he was defending his family. I didn't say he was right to push the guy down.
However, yelling at someone DOES aromatically make you the aggressor.
Imagine you accidentally rear end someone in traffic.
The other driver gets out and starts screaming at you. Would you say that other driver is being aggressive? Would you feel safe staying in that situation? Would you be justified in leaving the scene of the accident?
This guy wasn't just arguing. He was yelling at the driver.
@Eric Taylor I did and found them to be unreasonable.
1 like"He who begins, a quarrel or dispute, either by threatening or striking another. No man may strike another because he has threatened, or in consequence of the use of any words."
Either by threatening or striking.
There is definitive evidence that he did not strike the vehicle's occupant and it is also impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he threatened the occupant.
@I R What is wrong with you?
0 likesI'm not going to reply if you are not even going to bother reading my responses.
He was physical and confrontational in his approach toward a car filled with a family.
0 likesMarquis pushed him in order to diffuse this confrontation out of concern for his family’s well being
@SkeletalSounds _ But was he justified in doing so? Did that action defuse the situation, or did it escalate the situation?
0 likes@Eric Taylor i cant say either party was justified in their actions. i can only speculate on motive
0 likes@Tasha Vladimiroff As someone who is disabled, I understand.
0 likesBetter to put wood screws under their tires than to confront them.
@Eric Taylor Marquis came out and was the first to be violent. That makes him the aggressor.
0 likes@Daniel G Was it this guys job to enforce parking laws? No, it was not.
0 likesHe stated that he had the gun as an "equalizer" for exactly these sorts of situations.
Did I say he had every right to push him down? I don't think he did, so I doubt I said it, unless I was quoting some other person.
In the end, this guy had no right to shoot the man who pushed him.
If you walk around shouting at people, you are going to get hit sooner or later, regardless if it is right or wrong.
Yes a video I haven't seen yet
1 likeWhy do ' Murcans need those curb things in parking lots? What function do they serve? What do they call them?
0 likesHe had been involved in 4 other documented altercations. Guy was just looking for trouble and he found it. 20 years to think about it now.
346 likesReplies (24)
@WETiLAMBY you can literally shoot someone for pushing you in Florida though
1 likeAs someone who has been to prison for two years and seen some shit I can tell you, he is about to see a lot more trouble over the next 20 years as well. This time however, the coward won't have a gun to deal with the trouble that he causes.
10 likesLOL
0 likesThis is a powerful comment
1 likeWatch the video. It states that they're going for the maximum of 30.
0 likesZachk he got 20 though. Probably be let out in 10 at the earliest.
0 likesHe’s sitting in prison right now thinking he did nothing wrong and was railroaded by an anti-white male society. He’ll get out with the same sociopath attitude.
2 likesI saw a man paralyzed from getting pushed...hit his head on a handrail. You can kill someone by pushing them in front of, off of, or
3 likesonto something.
@SPIDERM0OSE ye completely rational to shoot people when they push you, like geez, pushing ppl is the mist direct sign that they are probably going to kill you
1 like@Mekon Headed Freak
0 likesTruth has a way of standing the test of time like that.
@Justin W
0 likesReal life man. Respect is a two way street.
Since you brought up Mr. Drejka's history I think you should also bring up Mr. McGlockton's.
3 likes@siberwolf33
0 likesWhy would he do that when we live in a simple world where the designated perfect people wear white hats & get victimised by the evil bad guys who wear black hats.
@SPIDERM0OSE in what way was it life threatening for the shooter, and do u really think you can justify a killing through "he failed to show enough respect"? Hope you have a good time binge watching alex jones though
0 likes@SPIDERM0OSE triggered from youtube comments PepeLaugh
0 likesThis guy doesn’t strike me as someone who does a lot of thinking to begin with so I doubt he’ll have come up with an insightful thought in the next 20 years...
0 likes@John Jimbob In fear for life or bodily harm...
0 likes@Justin W true dat. Dont harrass women. Its wreckless, rude, unchivalrous etcetcetc
0 likes@siberwolf33 why dont you just share it with us
0 likes@Lady Kdog 17 I don't know it. Just think that would be the fair thing to do
0 likes@Lady Kdog 17 well if the "lady" was not breaking the law and taking advantage of the handicapped people of the community. He wouldn't of said anything at all. Just another person sick of seeing lawbreakers turn his community into 💩 nice victim blaming. As I recall the law breakers boyfriend came out with out saying a word and assaulted somebody. Great people
1 likeclearly saw a black woman in the car and thought bingo!
0 likes@Oskar winters Sounds like your projecting your way of thinking.
0 likes@Todd Baker he's not in law enforcement. He thinks someone is breaking the law, he should call the law
0 likesNo matter what you feel about the guy pushing him, shooting someone who is retreating and at that point poses no risk is completely wrong.
2413 likesReplies (74)
Hey it’s kinda illegal to shoot someone if they turn around and start retreating/running away, sooo….he kinda just killed that dude in cold blood.
113 likes@Venge Drip uhh, yeah? Sorry I’m confused is that not the basic point of my comment or are you reiterating it for emphasis?
129 likes@LyssaGames I totally understand the point @Dystroxy TG is making, but I am not sure I understand your point?
16 likesDon't you know that it is illegal to shoot someone who is retreating and poses no risk no matter how you may feel about them? 🙃
@Cybertech66 it’s both legally and morally wrong. Of course it’s illegal, but it’s also a terrible thing to do.
60 likesI saw a few comments where people said the husband shouldn’t have pushed the shooter to begin with, so I’m saying no matter how you feel about the pushing, shooting him was wrong, both legally and morally (so completely). That is exactly what my comment is saying.
@LyssaGames I was being facetious and just joking. I totally understood your point and was merely playing on the fact @Dystroxy TG repeated your comment, so I repeated it again. 😉
30 likes@Cybertech66 lol your powers of sarcasm are too strong, I bow to you 😂 went right over my head
38 likes@Cybertech66 for future reference when someone uses 🙃 it's always sarcastic lol
16 likes@Cal Thanks...I will use that from here on out!
6 likesHe started a conflict. If I leave a store and find a man squared off against my wife and kids, I will also come out throwing punches.
54 likes@Cybertech66 oh shit i realized i replied to the wrong person
4 likes@Maximilian Raley I don't disagree with that. I think people went inside and told the guy that someone was in the parking lot cursing out his girlfriend so he came out hot. That mistake cost him his life, but it shouldn't have. No winners here.
25 likes@Venge Drip That's exactly what she said..... Lmao you disagreeable guy you
2 likesGuy got smoked because he was angry and got physical before verbal
8 likes@Cybertech66 Absolutely not. I've had someone confront my fiance for the exact same thing. We had a handicapped placard though and they said we didn't "look" disabled. Whatever that means. I ran out. I didn't run up to the guy, just ran close enough that I could see what was happening. I walked up calmly and introduced myself as the ladys fiance and then we talked about it. The craziest part is we walked away from that with us both disagreeing. He didn't like that we didn't appear handicapped. I told him she had scoliosis and such. He didn't want to hear it and cussed me out. Sure i could have gotten aggressive back but that serves no purpose. As adults we need to start choosing our battles far more wisely and stop thinking the aggressive one is somehow the winner.
24 likesWait to cast judgment until you're in that split second decision and scared you're about to get hurt badly with adrenaline coursing through your body.
7 likes@Bobby Dee pushing to the ground someone who is shorter and weaker than you isnt brave either
11 likesBut Brotha should have maintained his temper by not putting his hands on Drejka. Regardless, like it or not, Drejka is still alive and will serve maybe 35 percent of his 20 year sentence.
6 likes@Patrick O'Reilly Yep. The only reason Drejka is in jail is that he didn't speak to a lawyer immediately. 22:15 for commentary essentially saying it.
3 likes@Venge Drip he didn't though. She shot him once after getting pushed to the ground, and then the victim began to flee.
1 like@Poker Joker 100% agree. bro shouldnt have pushed him. man was tryna be a hero in front of his girl and unfortunately caused his demise. i personally would never shoot someone if they werent a threat but i would also never be treated like sh.t either, especially if i wasnt causing no sort of physical altercation. big bro was asking for trouble when he pushed him to the ground, and even though shooting him was not the right thing to do, i don’t completely blame him for doing so.
10 likes@saintretep I agree with you , it’s sad and should not have happened, but the guy was in the right I feel.. I mean would u let some random guy come up and push u down like that ?he also looked like he was going to keep attacking him , The guy was acting way to tough for his own good. I feel sorry for him and his kid.. but the dude really put himself in that situation
4 likes@L4m3nt0 fair but if you keep trying to attack after the gun is pulled it is on you if you get shot.
0 likesHe did what cops do everyday. He provoked the situation waited on the perfect opportunity and as soon as he saw that opportunity he got him one.
13 likesTrue
1 like@Gl 1100
4 likesYou're speaking about your own comment because the news proves what I said to be true everyday.
Yea the girl shouldn’t have parked there in the first place. She gets out of the car when her an who got shot comes up and pushes the guy when they were just yelling. They’re all at fault.
2 likes@E T To an extent, but the fact is you DONT SHOOT SOMEBODY IN THE BACK WHO IS FLEEING. How is this such a hard concept?
4 likes@Ricky Ray and where did I say it was justifiable to shoot??
1 likeLEARN TO READ!! Is that hard to understand??
@Bobby Dee you seem very passionate about this.
0 likesAmerican logic heck yeah freedom brutheeer
0 likeswrong ... keep ur hands off others period
3 likesI mean, TrayVonTe JuWan Jenkins or whatever Drejka's "victim's" name was would be alive if he hadn't committed an unjustified assault on a much older man who was in no way a threat to Shaniqua.
3 likesThere's this thing called the totality of the situation. When someone pushes you down, then steps towards you to do something else (as the video shows), and then steps back when you produce a weapon, you don't know if he's retreating or if he's turning to pull a weapon out of sight.
11 likesThe jury got this 100% wrong. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes, for both the murdered man and the defendant here.
Yeah, i mean he stood by the car a long time, he sure was waiting to shoot someone. He probably almost shot the kids and the wife in the car. I'm just glad the comment section understands that this is not a back white issue. Problem is both had anger issues, its an anger contest, the one with more anger "won"? idk.
0 likes@FIREBLACK 74.14 “the news” eh? Last “unprovoked shooting” i heard of was a dude who attacked a cop with a rock and tried to steal his gun, after attacking several other couples and stealing a car. Got any others more recent? Sounds like you see at least a couple hundred every year
1 likeL4m3nt0 agreed!
0 likesThere have been all types of murders lately. This is certainly not the America I once knew. I get along with everyone. Sensitive subjects are just not discussed and we can still enjoy ourselves. America is just not a happy place to live anymore. I stay solely to myself. That helps relieve my stress and anxiety because people have gone nuts everywhere.
1 like@S Ss You could've just said "I'm a racist" and your point would've come across in much fewer words.
3 likes@Sloth
1 likeOnce you're WRONGFULLY attacked @Sloth, there's no legal obligation on YOU to prove what degree you BELEIVED he/she intended their attack.
@William Parker Actually you can. Someone stepping backwards isn't a retreat, it can be to conceal pulling a weapon, etc. Here's a good video of someone walking away who ended up shooting a police officer...
1 likehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=884W4l3eoQg
Was he retreating? Come on man, at least look into your claims before you make them.
duh?
0 likes@Maximilian Raley I agree. I don't understand this vigilante mentality that is seemingly erupting. I had a handicapped parking permit for my mother who suffered from congestive heart failure. I had let her off at the door of a store and then parked in a handicapped space with permit displayed as I would be escorting my mother back to the car. I went into the store to join my mother. When we returned to the car, there was a scribbled note on our windshield in the most foul language accusing us of fraudulent use of the handicapped space. People, YOU ARE NOT THE POLICE. Call the police if you perceive an issue. DO NOT TAKE ON THIS RESPONSIBILITY WHICH IS NOT YOURS!!
0 likesSo if someone steals the only food you have left and is running away, you don't feel morally justified in shooting them in the back? Hmm.
0 likes@James Edward Sterling no I definitely don’t feel the need or justification to murder someone.
0 likes@LyssaGames its either that or starve to death. You would choose starvation over stopping the person who is trying to take your means of survival? I think you're just virtue signaling at this point.
0 likesno it is not. it is sadly the result of the law. threating the aggressor and brandishing the gun usually comes always with a penalty for the victim, shooting the aggressor should be covered under Floridas stand your ground law. if the skin color would be reversed no one would line up and march for the guy who got shot
1 likeTrue, the act of the guy was killed was to aggressive, but the shooter, he was to angry and he shoots not because he was on danger o losing he’s life, because is was to angry.
0 likesTrue, the act of the guy was killed was to aggressive, but the shooter, he was to angry and he shoots not because he was on danger o losing he’s life, because is was to angry.
0 likes@James Edward Sterling no really I wouldn’t. I can go another day without food, I’ll survive, or I know several people who would give me food. Shooting someone in the back over food is something only a friendless coward would do.
0 likes@LyssaGames What if someone kept taking from you every day? Everything you traded your labor for, they stole. You would essentially be a slave. Nothing wrong with taking the life of those who act like cockroaches. After all, humans are just animals, and I'm not saying you should take pride in having to kill someone, I'm just saying that sometimes its necessary to kill other animals for your own survival. Food for thought.
1 like@James Edward Sterlingthat is an entirely different situation from this one or the one you described. You’re just trying to up the ante to get me to say “okay yes I would kill them” at this point.
0 likes@LyssaGames The point I'm trying to make is that shooting someone in the back can sometimes be justified. Sometimes that should be left to the discretion of the victim. YOU yourself may not shoot someone who has robbed you and is running away, but that shouldn't be any of your business if a victim decides they WANT to shoot their assailant as they try to flee. This is how the world should work if we want to decrease the amount of criminals victimizing others.
0 likesSome people still try to defend the shooter by saying it is self defense despite it not being so whatsoever. If people are this confuse on to what counts as self defense then I am scared to go outside with my child.
1 likeWho knows what his intentions were when pushing him to the ground… when you feel your life is in danger you do some pretty wild things. Not saying it’s okay to kill someone but if things got out of hand he could have been the one killed. You always have to look out for yourself in this sick world.
1 like@ProdByPrimal Who knows what my intentions are walking down the street towards you? How far do we extend this logic? Is it to the point where violence occurs? Who knows my intent in flicking my best friend? Is it to the point of obvious physical confrontation? Who knows some guy's intent in getting into a bar fight with some other guy who hit on his wife? Are we really going to argue that anyone that gets shoved or punched or attacked in any way has the right to shoot their attacker?
0 likes@Tojki no I’m not saying that at all, it’s a lot different if it’s your friend rather than a complete stranger. I’m not justifying that it’s right to shoot someone or kill anyone. The situation could have been handled without lethal force. Obviously this man thought his life was in danger.
0 likes@Tojki people shouldn’t be allowed open carry of fire arms in the states then and this stuff wouldn’t happen.
1 likeI’m not sure I would have pushed him but boy do i understand why he did.
0 likesLooked to me as if he got shot in the front not the back only retreating after the man had shot him. Hardly a retreat. I'm not saying what he did was right or wrong because I would have defended my woman and my kid just the same as dude did, and if it was in reverse and I got pushed down I would have got back up and settled it with my hands but I been boxing for a decade and a half and I'm a very able bodied person so if I wasn't it's hard to say. It does seem a bit aggressive to shoot him but hey it's a bit aggressive to shove a handicap person to the ground when it was their fault for parking in a handicap spot in the first damn place.
0 likes@Leeartlee completely agree, gun owners like the manchild in this video who treat their guns like toys are the reason gun advocates look bad. What’s insane to me is there are people in this comment section who seen the beginning footage of marquis backing away from the gun, watching the psychological examination in the video, and the guilty verdict and still think that he was in any way in the right.
1 likeif someone pushed me like that, i'd definitely take a kneecap , thats just me
0 likesWhat a life. Your whole life revolves around who parks in a handicap parking spot.
0 likesbest summary of this case
0 likessad that the obvious isnt obvious for most americans
1 likeEnd if story shooting the guy was wrong. And honestly I think he had rights to push the guy as he was defending his wife...though maybe a bit excessive.
0 likes@caleb masters You don't have the right to assault somebody just because of an argument. It's also not a good idea as it will only escalate the situation.
0 likesAre you people serious!? Listen, I am liberal for the most part. I do think everyone has the right to own a gun tho. But wrong is wrong.
2 likesThe black guy assaulted the guy first! The white guy was just talking and didn't do anything illegal.
You can say he was annoying or whatever but he didn't assault anyone. It's a free country. First ammendment. Say what you want but when you put your hands on someone and push them that hard to the ground, I no longer view you as the victim but the aggressor.
The black guy only retreated after he saw the gun pointed at him. It didn't matter if he was walking back at that point. The crime of assault was already committed. I am tired of my fellow liberals defending the suspects and victims of police violence no matter what they do. Resisting arrest, punching and cop, driving away, etc.
No one deserves to die for it but obey the law! Don't assault someone. Period. I dont feel bad for the guy who got killed in this situation at all. His girlfriend said, do I need to go get my man. They were the aggressors. The white guy was just annoying and nosy. But they were parked in the handicap parking spot which is also ILLEGAL!!!
@Milky Way It absolutely matters that he was walking back, why do you think he got jailed for 20 years? Aggressor or not, this wasn't self defence, he was no longer a threat, nor would he have been without the gun. I'm not saying the assault was justified, assault is still assault, but the shooter was looking for trouble and committing an assault doesn't justify you to shoot somebody retreating. If you don't feel sorry for his death, then how can you believe nobody deserves to die for it? Also, the shooter was parked in an illegal spot as well, so that's a double standard.
1 likeI completely agree BUT maybe he wouldnt have got shot if he didnt push him? Dont immediately resort to violence, use your words like a grown adult, they both effed up here.
0 likesNo it’s not. By that logic they can shoot your child and run away and can’t be punished
0 likesI agree it was totally unnecessary and could have been completely avoided.
1 likeI could if he pushed him and then went on top of him and started punching the crap out of him but it was one push and then he backed off which is what you are supposed to do and then if that person that is pushed escalates it from there then its the next persons turn and on and on.
That guy should never have been allowed a gun but of course its never that simple, AND Michael Drejka arrived and parked perpendicular to Jacobs’ car, was also illegally parked and blocking alternate access to that same ramp. Furthermore, while both Drejka and McGlockton were regular customers, the store’s owner, Abdalla “Ali” Salous (not present at the time of the shooting), said he had previously had issues with Drejka at his business. Another customer, Richard Kelly, told Spectrum News that he had an interaction with Drejka after parking in the same improperly marked handicapped parking space weeks prior to the fatal shooting.
@L4m3nt0 Verbal and physical conflict are two different things. Screaming and cursing never killed anyone.
0 likesNot defending Drejka here, but there are enough cases of people dying, after someone pushed them. Not even to mention throwing someone. Completely stupid and dangerous thing to do
@LyssaGames It's also a terrible thing to knock a stranger down who was not being violent.
0 likesAgreed.
0 likesOn the other hand i can kind of relate if you made that being pushed experience often enough. You are full of adrenaline when pushed down.
He's far more persistent on making it seem like he was "using a gun correctly" rather than "being innocent". Its stupidly hilarious.
290 likesReplies (12)
That's what people get taught. I've always been told that if someone picks up a gun or brings it with them, that they are fully prepared to use it to kill something so it shouldn't have ever been about whether it was legal to carry the gun
1 likeYeah, so what? He was a calm, experienced and confident gun owner who DID use it correctly and responded to a hostile aggressor in a very limited and measured way considering he only shot one, well-place bullet AFTER being violently assaulted by an aggressive drug addict.
1 like@Sabrason I beg to differ, as the prosecutor stated clear as day he was justified in pulling the weapon, but considering the victim (who isn't a drug addict) was not only backing off, but was already a considerable distance from the defendant, AND was unarmed, he was completely and utterly unjustified to fire. Which is why I believe he should rot in jail, as he not only killed a man while not justified to, but is also a threat to society in my eyes.
11 likes@Sabrason a Trump supporter i see
6 likes@ChrisW Stop lying. McGlockton had several amphetamines like Molly in his system which causes, among other things, aggressive/violent behavior....look it up. He was a drug addict with a history of assaulting a police officer so he thought he could lay hands on people and did so in front of his little kids....not exactly a healthy father figure and certainly no model citizen. He also took 2-3 additional steps TOWARDS Drejka AFTER the push which would make any normal person who was violently pushed to the ground and injured reasonably fear further bodily harm which justifies the use of lethal force = classic SYG law which is why many national legal experts agreed. McGlockton slightly turning his body to one side meant nothing in that instant as he could've just as easily been repositioning to pull his own firearm so Drejka had NO choice but to fire. This is basic common sense. Had McGlockton immediately put his hands up and said "don't shoot" I could agree with you but he didn't. Any opinion to the contrary relies on hindsight and additional information obtained long AFTER the fact that Drejka did not have at the moment of the conflict.
2 likes@Sabrason well placed bullet?? Do you know anything about self defense?
4 likes@Lancaster Oh yeah, and Drejka's single, well-placed bullet hit center mass (albeit a tad to the left b/c McGlockton half-turned at the last instant) ripping through the lung and heart and forced a guy high on Molly to run and hide before bleeding out. Threat neutralized. That's what I call phenomenal self defense!! I only hope my training allows me to perform as well with my .357 Magnum if/when the time comes.
0 likes@Sabrason ok cultist
3 likesI think law enforcement should already be looking into Sabrason's identity, as this guy is just as much a threat to society as the criminal in the video. Hopefully nothing happens, but if Sabrason ever commits a crime, it would be nice to have the prosecution use these comments as proof of his crooked mental state.
2 likesPS can't wait for his reply 🤣
@The Real Maxis sadly there are plenty of people like them
1 like@The Real Maxis dude he is obviously trolling...
0 likes@Juhu Mamamam hope so
0 likesThree kids lost their dad over a parking spot. THAT'S ALL I'D SAY IN COURT.
2014 likesReplies (106)
Moral of the story:
123 likesDon't do something that could bother crazy people, even like parking ilegaly.
These loonatics could kill you for something insignificant. They just need a small reason to pull a gun and shoot.
This moron was acting like that parking lot was his private propery and that guy was there trespassing with intent of stealing something.
Lawyers dressed him in a suit, (probably for the first time in his life) gave him glasses, and instructed him to take notes at the trial (i mean for real, bro lawyer ?) 😂 ..
Trying to make him look like a sweet member of high society that was brutally attacked by a bad black man.
When the loser was in shorts and slippers for his entire life, watching military training documentaries from his mama's couch.
@Dan _ excuse me but they didn't park illegally. the shooter was the one parked illegally. not to mention why should people have to alter what they do because some people can't keep their gun i their pants
57 likes@tierra is lame xx
82 likesYou're excused.
Watch the video again.
Seems like you've missed the part where his wife's car is parked on a handicap spot.
The crazy dude wouldn't have had a reason to start a fight that ended up with a man losing his life, if she parked in front of the store where there were alot of empty spaces.
As i've said:
Everybody should avoid doing things that could bother the crazy ones. It could make the difference between ending up in a morgue, or at home playing with your kids or watching tv.
✌️
No he’s not, he’s making a valid point. He’s not saying “they parked in a handicapped spot so they got what they deserved” or that “...it’s there fault”, he’s saying that there are crazy people like this guy who are looking for even the most minor things to create conflict from. He’s saying that through avoiding such minor things, in which your avoidance doesn’t really create any extra burden, you avoid the situation of someone getting mad at you for it.
119 likesPlease take a second to think about someone’s stance/comment before getting mad and belittling someone on the internet ya bum.
He died cause he parked illegal then used violence. It was mostly the violence
42 likesDon't fkn push people who you don't know. Lots of people carrying these days.
20 likesHe shoved him to the floor NOT bc of a parking spot. It starters over that and he was attacked and then he shot. just like if a person is pulled over for a broken tail light and shoot police I guess they died over a broken tail light.
6 likesSad. But let’s not pretend that the victim also played a role in his own demise. Yelling at someone isn’t a good excuse to get physical with anyone. Two people did stupid shit and one died. It’s like a trashy Greek tragedy.
17 likes@Neil Siebenthal
8 likesSome intelligent fella just explained with a reply, to the ones that are a lil bit slow, what i was saying.
Please read my comment again. Maybe you'll get it too.
✌️
@Dan _ Look man, you gotta go into hiding. There are a lot of dangerous types on YouTube, and you cannot go around speaking these kinds of truths. I will have to delete my account after commenting this to you, so don’t waste this opportunity.
5 likes@AppleSauwse
2 likes*Error. Account not found!
@Weezy Peezy
2 likesThank you, intelligent and reasonable person !
Looks like there are alot of captains slow (not james may kind of slow) out there.
Take care and
Stay safe, man !
✌️
@Fetal Cop If the guy hadnt raised his voice and was actively looking for trouble, as you said, with a gun packed, it wouldnt have happened either, you know that, right? Funny how you consider only one side, namely the man who wants to get the crazy yelling person away from his family with a push is in the wrong, not the lunatic with a gun. And the more people like you defend such instances, the more gun violence will be justified and brushed off as "Oi, he pushed someone, good that he got shot." Sad views.
6 likes@Holy Hand Grenades Love you too babe
0 likes@Dan _ Only in America!
0 likesSalQ 100% agree.
2 likesNeil Siebenthal maybe dont push ppl to the ground ??? smh
3 likesThey lost their dad because he couldn't control his violent impulses. This trait is very common amongst the left.
6 likesDan _ you can’t live your life at the mercy of what a crazy person might do because there isn’t a logical connection between actions
7 likesThree kids lost their dad because he assaulted Billy Badass for a verbal altercation.
7 likes@SalQ I think that the folks you are conversing with already know who is right and who is wrong and have moved on.
4 likesThey are engaged in the conversation of what the father of three could have done to get himself home safe to see his kids grow up. The father is not in the wrong and I don't think that anyone is saying that he asked for it by his behavior. He is dead though and sometimes there is better than being righteous.
At the end of the day we are all working through that a man that shouldn't be dead is, and a man that probably deserves to be dead isn't. Some of us just wish this hadn't happened so much that we work through the what ifs that would leave the innocent unharmed. Anyway that's how I read things. Take care.
Edit: Okay I read farther down and "anyone" might have been overly optimistic.
Maybe when you should assume everyone is armed before you assault someone. Jogger got Jogged.
2 likes@Kevin Sargeant I fully understand your point and the what ifs also do interest me. However, like you probably also now saw after the edit, some people don't see it as an option to think "what if" from the side of the shooter and just put blame on the murdered. It is not a solution to live life on eggshells because of the slight possibility someone loses their temper and unnecessarily shoots. So I fully understand the "What if this man hadnt pushed him but had yelled at him instead" but there's a lack of "What do we change so this wont happen again".
1 likeTake good care, stay healthy.
Civilian Expunged Thank you! I’ll say it again... if he would have handled it like a MAN (men talk through problems by the way...not charge at someone like a football linebacker without even knowing the situation) and not like a child. He would still be here....
3 likesI hope some of you guys in the comments don't have a wife or girlfriend, because if I come out the store and see a man aggressively talking to my wife or girlfriend I'm doing the same thing..
2 likesmaybe the dad shouldn't go picking on the weak. They might be packing. Nothing of value was lost that day.
1 likeDan _ this i honestly don’t know how people aren’t understanding what you said.
2 likesmathew cuthbert except he didn’t have his weapon out therefore not a shooter in the moment. meaning the father attacked him and hey i don’t agree with shooting him, but people are crazy so always be careful
1 likeJerry Alexander you’re going to attack someone because he’s yelling? and then risk getting shot or even worse your girl?? then how would you feel after she’s dead because you couldn’t control your temper? trust me i don’t think he should’ve shot, but cmon now
2 likes@shoo sheep you know what's funny(not funny) is that if the roles were reversed and the black man was yelling at a white woman in the car with her kids and her husband came out and shot the guy that was yelling y'all would be defending that too..
2 likes@Dan _ moral of the story is mind your own business, he had no right to approach that woman and yell at her but he has about 20yrs in prison to think about minding his own business
1 likeJerry Alexander what are you talking about? i’m not defending the shooting lol but of course you bring race into this. i said that there are crazy idiots with guns out there and this is what happens when you don’t make the best decision. what you said has nothing to do with what i said and on top of that you of course bring race in even though i’m not white
0 likes@shoo sheep defending your wife or girlfriend from a crazy man yelling is what most any other man would've done.. You don't just there and allow a man to yell at your wife and do nothing because he might be crazy or he might have a gun..
0 likes@shoo sheep I think that you have attack and defend confused, he DEFENDED his wife and kids from an aggressive crazy man..
0 likes@shoo sheep the guy with the gun was the aggressor, he started with that woman in the car, she was minding her own business, HE INITIATED EVERYTHING, and I guarantee he was yelling and being aggressive because he knew he had a gun on him, he felt like he had power and authority because he was carrying.. But he has about 20yrs to think about it now, the best years of his life wasted because he didn't know how to mind his own business
1 likeI am a handicapped person. I have mobility trouble and I have handicapped placard. And I would walk from the back on the biggest mall parking lot rather than see someone lose their life over a fuck*ng parking spot. I agree with you. This is a tragedy
2 likesbravo1IsixI I mean tbh I think he was just trying to protect the people he loved a lot of people are basically victim blaming they shouldn’t have parked in the spot but it’s still not their fault I genuinely believe he thought that Drejka was going to do something to his girlfriend and just wanted to push him away from her Drejka shouldn’t have acted like some amazing hero protecting the parking lots of Florida everyone has pushed someone before look back at a time you did and then tell me that if you died because of it that it was kind of your fault I mean come on it was a push and he acted like he was tackled by some football player
2 likes@violetangel exactly, he was protecting his family..
0 likes@shoo sheep
0 likesSome are slow, man..
Take care.
✌️
@Angel Santos
2 likesUS seems like such a terrible place to live in.
I just saw another video - a black doctor was arrested in front of his house when he was loading a van by a cop not wearing a mask, also spitting in his face.
He had to yell for his whife to come outside and confirm that he lives there.
I would have sued that cop for everything he's got.
Not the police department.
How come it's called the "land of the free", when you can get your freedom away from you, in a finger snap, just because you're sitting in front of your house... 🤦🏻♂️
"American dream"
More like american nightmare. :(
@Jerry Alexander He was trying to protect his family by coming out of the store and immediately escalating the situation by shoving the guy? I'm sorry, but that's not how to protect a family. It was a verbal argument, until the guy who got shot made it physical. He didn't deserve to die, but I can't be sad about an asshole like him dying either.
1 like@モチポンズ what are you talking about?? The situation was escalated when the guy pulled up and went to the lady's car and started a confrontation.. 😂😂😂🤦🏾♂️
1 like@Jerry Alexander He told her it's not OK to park in a handicapped spot. We don't see her or him gesturing, so I'm assuming it was only a verbal altercation, no one was getting hurt. People only started to get hurt when the father joined in by immediately shoving the guy so hard he fell to the ground.
0 likes@Jerry Alexander Oh and regarding "protector of a family"... are you saying it was the right thing to do for the father to attack the guy, just because he saw him arguing with his wife?
1 like@モチポンズ YES, it was ok to defend his family, if I'm arguing with your wife and you don't do anything about it then you might as well get a divorce right then and there because you'll never be respected in that marriage again 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
0 likes@モチポンズ it wasn't his place to tell anybody anything, so soon as he confronted her about a parking spot that is what escalated the situation.. If he minds his own business then he wouldn't be spending the best years of his life in prison 🤷🏿♂️, I hope that parking spot was worth 20yrs of his life 🤷🏿♂️
0 likes@モチポンズ bottom line is he had a gun and felt like he was a big bad authority figure and was looking for confrontation, now he has 20yrs to think about his errors, end of story ✌🏿
0 likes@Dan _ the black guy wasn't shot over a parking spot, he was shot over assaulting a man. And while I think he shouldn't have been shot in the first place, the guy had no business assaulting him.
3 likes@Dan _ if your racist, just say that
2 likes@Lili
0 likesAnother one ! 🤦🏻♂️
Who said that the guy deserved to be killed ?
Well, the way the black man pushed him to the ground also doesn't seem justifiable.
2 likes@Иосиф Steelin nope, but his punishment shouldnt have been murder, and it didnt need to be.
0 likes@JH vibes Of course, they were both in the wrong. The convicted is not able to carry weapons responsibly and is trigger happy.
0 likes@Jerry Alexander the reaction, from a normal person, to a verbal argument is to de-escalate the situation verbally. the father initiated the violence. you are just mad that your fellow black man lost.
2 likes@Artruis Joew so you call 20yrs in jail winning?? 😂😂😂😂 🤦🏾♂️, NOBODY Won..
0 likes@Dan _ the parking spot is not what got the black dude killed. what got him killed was him shoving the guy to the ground. the black dude initiated the violence but was not prepared to finish it.
2 likes@Jerry Alexander compared to the dead guy? yes.
1 like@Artruis Joew that's up for debate..
0 likes@Artruis Joew that guy is 47 years old, he'll be damn near 70 by the time he's out, that's if he doesn't die in prison, and hopefully he can get through his 20yrs without being beaten and or raped.. It's safe to say that both of their lives ended on that day, all because a guy with gun tried to play police.. It's a shame, smh
0 likesthank god you're not a lawyer then
1 likeThis guy took more time killing someone than anyone would have sitting in that handicap spot.
0 likesWell... lost their dad because their dad turned a verbal argument over a parking space into a physical confrontation
3 likes@Ow me ed there were no winners, like I said.. 🤷🏿♂️
0 likes@Dan _ imagine having a few lunatics dictate how you live your life must be freaking sad huh
0 likes@MarshmallowWaffleXP
0 likesWell.. i guess you haven't seen the video ?
😂😂🤦🏻♂️
Over illegally parking
1 likeOver assault
Over two men and one woman thinking they're badassess.
Three kids are without their father because three adults never stopped being kids.
@S Con yes one person lost their life and everyone else life has been affected forever all because someone thought that they were the police because they had a gun.. It's a truly Sad story 😔
0 likesWell he attacked a guy also. He lost his life for attacking the wrong guy
1 likeShe shouldn’t have parked there tho 🤷🏼♂️
2 likes@Welder Drew what's funny(not funny) is that the guy with the gun wasn't even in a parking spot either so they both were illegally parked 🤷🏿♂️
0 likes@tierra is lame xx parking in a handicap spot without a placard is illegal. But dude shulda minded his own business nobody had to die. It's sad....
0 likesJerry Alexander It’s not illegal if your white 🙄 come on this is common sense.
0 likesMoral of the story..dont push people, watxh your parking and bann guns america xD
0 likes@Dan _ just in america..
0 likes@Dan _ An alternative would be a civilised world where a threatening second Ammandement doesnt excist and people don't execute self justice upon each other.
0 likesPoke Poke You mean a ‘Proud Boy.’
0 likes@Jerry Alexander ya for sure. Violence is never the answer. They all learned a lesson that day
0 likesSnapper well that wasn’t self defense, he was trigger happy and because of that he will go to jail 🤷🏼♂️
0 likesSnapper that’s not a reason to take away everyone else right to self defense
0 likesSnapper I agree
0 likesSnapper I responded to you thinking you were someone else in the comments who said that all guns should be banned lmao
0 likesNO!! HE LOST JIS LIFE BECAUSE HE THOUGHT HE WOULD ATTACK THE GUY AND GET AWAY WITH IT.
1 likeNeil Siebenthal Dude would still be alive today if he hadn’t shoved a dude half his size that was zero threat to him or his family so hard that he bounced off the fucking parking lot. Drejka would be free today if he had called the police over the parking lot if he felt the need to do something.
2 likesThere was no good guy in this story.
@T L my point exactly!! Bless you for using reason and logic in your statement.
0 likesBoth men are to blame. The man who shoot is just more at fault. 100% both are at fault.
0 likesThis is American. Dont catch you slipping now.
0 likes@Weezy Peezy think about ur own logic: These crazy people will find any minor thing to attack u over.. So even if u do everything right THEY WILL STILL FIND SOMETHING if that's their intention. It is easy to pick a fight with someone over nothing. The family being in the handicap parking spot had nothing to do with his obvious dream to kill someone and get away w it via "self defense." He purposefully started confrontations w random people on the road on multiple occasions.
1 like@Nomana yeah that’s a great point. He was looking for something and he found it.
2 likes@Dan _ i think the killer should maybe be at fault? it is not her fault that hes crazy, and a handicap spot is not, at all, a reason to shoot and kill someone
0 likesThey're better off wihtout him, that is for sure
1 like@mathew cuthbert so what youre saying is it is ok to be violent with someone over a verbal altercation? Interesting train of thought you have there.
0 likes@bigbodyrover you act like dan was saying the shooting was justified. Dan was talking about how to avoid a situation that ended up with the father dead because he got violent over a verbal altercation. You people are wild do you also support antifa as well?
0 likes@dualspectrumreality ytilaermurtcepslaud careful man you can go spreading truths like that on the internet
0 likes@Jerry Alexander and youll likely end up getting shot for assaulting someone like the father did here. This is what i dont understand with people now that they think it is remotely ok to become violent over a VERBAL ALTERCATION. The father could of VERBALLY defended his wife rather then physically assault the guy which lead to his own demise. Not victim blaming but like people need to act civilized for fuck sakes.
0 likes@Cynicalsinner91 bruh he wasnt even trying to be violent he was literally pushing him away from his girlfriend its not like he went up and tried to beat the crap outta him
0 likes@mathew cuthbert he ran up behind and shoved him. I hate to break it to you but that falls under being violent. Why couldnt he walked up and ask what the the fuck is going on instead of shoving the dude from behind? Why is it such an odd stance to not react to something verbal with something physical?
1 like@Cynicalsinner91 and you'll likely end up in prison 🤷🏿♂️..
0 likes@Cynicalsinner91 your logic makes no sense. You're saying it's not ok to escalate from arguing to shoving but it is ok to escalate from shoving to killing.. I swear some of you folks just be saying anything, you all are out here defending the offenders better than their lawyers.. 😂😂😂🤦🏾♂️
0 likes@Jerry Alexander i never once said it was kosher for the guy to shoot him, in a comment earlier i said the shooter should be fried for what he did. I also said both played the stupid game and won a stupid prize. But its ok be selective about what i said. Take it easy bub
0 likes@Cynicalsinner91 yea and earlier I said that there were no winners, soooo who's being selective?? You take it easy too ✌🏿
0 likes@Dan _ Moral of the story: Don't live in America where everyone can have a gun.
0 likesThats what he gets for pushing a stranger
0 likes@Neil Siebenthal it was the victims fault
0 likesawful .. just awful .. and painfull.
0 likes@SalQ As the spouse of a disabled person....THOSE SPOTS ARE NOT FOR YOUR USE.
0 likes@Jerry Alexander Son, I've been in this kind of situation, and the man I was with didn't even have to say a word...he walked over and got the little twerp to back off. This young man did NOT deserve to die. But unless that dipwad was moving towards me, or putting hands on me, the guy I was with wouldn't have pushed the twerp.
0 likesWhat a sad sad angry little man.
1 likeReplies (1)
He took one for the team 🤭
0 likesThis guy was waiting for this moment his whole life. He’s the self-proclaimed security guard of that store. Oh lord.
161 likesApparently there were several previous incidents of him drawing his gun at people for really minor things (like if he thought they were driving too slowly etc) so this guy is a danger to society. It was only a matter of time before he killed someone.
641 likesReplies (38)
Dang
2 likes@Southern Soul unfortunate that you weren’t one of this guys victims
31 likes@Southern Soul that makes absolutely no sense. The word 'thug' has obvious racial connotations, knowing these connotations do not make you racist alone. When you start using this word in the context you just did (saying you're happy that this person died) is when it becomes racist. Next you'll say that knowing the meaning of the n word makes you racist, that would be pretty silly obviously. It's okay that you don't know that though, we all have to learn!
48 likes@Southern Soul So exactly why did you " consciously " choose the " violent thug " description then ?
17 likes@July Bailey I didn't see any thuggish behavior either . I saw a man putting himself between his family and a belligerent a-hole.
19 likesi saw all the thuggish behavior i can imagine. First he stops in the only one place he shouldnt, then his girl sees hes coming, he puts his pants in its place and she gets out the car just perfect timing for him to become unnoticed, then the first thing he does is to kick his ass to the floor... the killer is a killer, but the thug is a thug, and the lady is not exactly a lady
8 likes@Southern Soul LMAFO... true. Still sad but true.
4 likes@Oxey I always associated "thug" with anybody violent or criminal. The douchebag murderer was clearly several feet from the car of the lady he was arguing with when and a man shoved him hard enough for him to fall several feet. Any rational and normal person would have come outside and either yelled at him to back away from his car or if they're extra normal they would have just talked and maybe even apologized for parking in a handicapped spot.
7 likesFurther, after a bit of research the origin of thug has nothing to do with black people, and I can find no evidence supporting your theory that it has ever been racially charged. The only thing I found that can associate thug with black people is the idea that thugs are generally "gangsters" which a large proponent of black people consider themselves to be gangsters. On this note, it would be stereotyping to consider all black people gangsters and thus thugs, which I wont do. The fact that you want to reserve a word like thug for an entire race of people is in and of itself rather racist in my opinion, of which I will have no part of.
Perhaps you should take a moment to reflect and instead turn to a quote by MLK “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
@Southern Soul jesus this guy has problems.
3 likes@Southern Soul maybe he wasn't the nicest person but i think pushing the guy yelling at your wife is something bad but not insane, now shooting a guy you don't know and the only think you know is he pushed you but backed up once he saw the weapon is intentional murder
4 likesYou gotta be crazy if you think killing people is fine just because they were angry or agressive when you could end it just pulling the gun out
Yes the video mentions some
0 likes@Bunni Bunni what they say?
0 likes@Southern Soul why did you delete the comment if it wasn’t racist
1 like@Southern Soul the murderer is obviously in the wrong he started the argument and it wasn’t the first time he pulled his gun
0 likes@Oxey what did he say? He deleted his first comment to make himself seem more reasonable.
0 likes@Hugh Mayle that's what I saw and the dude shot him after he stepped back.
1 like@AmanOU2be the guy was harassing and depending on what he said assaulting his wife. His push was justified. Are you stoned?
0 likes@king which is why everyone should carry one in my opinion. Though I agree yea egos and guns never mix. People need to remember, a firearm can take someone's life so you got to treat them as such.
1 like@AmanOU2be stand your ground does not protect you when you started the confrontation such as approaching someone's car and berating them or making demands. I live in a stand your ground state and you have no idea what you are talking about.
0 likes@AmanOU2be btw you ruined you own argument. You are probably right she did not send a text so all he saw was a guy having an altercation with his wife while his child was in the car. Most father's and husbands are going to take an aggressive approach to defending their family.
0 likes@Matti O Thanks for clearing me up on assault vs battery. That just makes your argument worse, though.
1 likeNo, he was NOT at minimum harassing his wife. Was it ever stated what either of them said?
Acting accordingly is not committing battery. He should have just gotten in between them.
With your own argument, MIKE took action on someone that was a potential threat.
Finally, don't be a hypocrite. Don't cry about me calling you an idiot when you insinuated I was high.
@Matti O The laws vary from state to state. I live in Ohio. The law here may differ from yours. Also, don't forget which people constitute the parties and who actual escalates the situation. The father is the one who started THAT confrontation.
1 likeIf you and other people continue to make poor decisions, people will continue to get shot.
@AmanOU2be I think you to be argumentative to be argumentative. The state has agreed with me.
0 likes@Matti OThe state agreed with you, when? With the conviction? If that is what you are saying, the state agreed with you (after not wanting to press charges in the first place) because he paused before firing and the victim was not advancing DURING that pause. The only reason he was convicted was the CC footage. The only witnesses seen in the footage are all party of the plaintiff's party. It would have been them vs him. Also, since the victim backed away and was shot in the front, that would have been even harder to convince a jury that the victim was not retreating. The trajectory of the projectile tells them that the two men were close.
0 likes@AmanOU2be the dude who pushed him immediately deescalated when he stepped back. Michael escalated it. The state agreed with man slaughter because he fired once and it happening be a shot that resulted in his death
0 likes@AmanOU2be the victim backed up with 3 steps when he started drawing and had begun to turn. That is evident in the video.
0 likes@AmanOU2be also did you forget he other guy that was in front of he store that saw what happened? So no even then your claim that it's only the victims family. Btw the plaintiff is the state. You keep using words like Michael does without really knowing what you are talking about.
0 likes@Matti O Right. What does that have to do with what you are arguing?
0 likes@AmanOU2be you mean the fact that you are misusing words? That is to show that your knowledge on the subject is lacking. It's less for you are more for others to see that your arguments have less weight because you don't really grasp what you are talking about. Sorry, I did drop a few comments together. Probably should have put them in 1 comment.
0 likes@Matti O You can keep correcting me on my word usage and still be wrong, as well. I thought the other guy was a relative. Also, he was moving away and it looks like he was focused on Mike (as he should be). All mike would have to say to the court is he was watching all "threats" and noticed that the man was watching him.
0 likes@Matti O No, not really. That is what you THINK. You can know the name of something and that is ALL you know about it.
0 likesDo you even remember what you were arguing? lol. The confrontation between the father and Mike is what is important, not the one between the wife and Mike. The father started the confrontation by shoving Mike down. HE started it and Mike responded by drawing his weapon. That should have been the end of the confrontation but we will never know that.
@Fancy Pants lol u really think u r bether?? U wich someone dead thats sick
0 likes@Bunni Bunni So how are you any better? Lol! You know there are many black people have been calling themselves "thugs" right? You mad at 2Pac?
0 likes@Bunni Bunni what was his comment?
0 likes@Fancy Pants what was his comment?
0 likes@Mus Mo scroll for the bs🙄
0 likes@sinkingship5 man thats cool cause he like that but not all of us thugs just like how all white people arent hateful pieces of shit😌🗒🖌take note. Be blessed
0 likes@Southern Soul why delete your original comment if you didn’t think you said anything wrong?
0 likesHe said he's been carrying for 26 years. I can't imagine how many times he would've gone on his little power trips by revealing his gun to threaten others over minor infractions
631 likesReplies (9)
I believe it said He had been reported 4 times between 2012-18 for pulling out a gun as the accused aggressor. timestamp 36:49
56 likesTo quote the wiki artical of this mane. " He accuses Drejka of threatening to shoot him and using a racial slur. The store owner Salous intervened and ordered Drejka to stop or else he would call the police, to whom Drejka replied, "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After the incident Drejka calls the company the driver works for and complains to the owner John Tyler, reportedly saying the driver was "lucky I didn't blow his head off." The driver reports this incident to the police in July after the shooting of Markeis McGlockton at the same location. " This is a man who thinks he is just in being king shit, and that taking someone's life is proper justification for 'doing the wrong thing'
45 likes(from 22 to 48 years old = 26 years of carrying a gun - not 16)
9 likesMillions of american citizens carry everyday. Most people aren't roaming around flashing their gun...
2 likesLol this guy went around trying to be a hero when no one asked for one. Unfortunately this game ended very badly.
3 likes@Mrbeanzzz lol oh wow look out guys, another white boy from the suburbs hopped on the keyboard
3 likes@Mrbeanzzz idk if i agree with that but still going for kill option instead of threating to shoot or asking them why he got pushed could've worked better. He fucked his own life and other dude's
0 likes@Kirsten Bakker Thanks, i thought he said he was 38. Him being 48 makes it even more pathetic in my eyes. Quite a good example that being older doesn't necessarily mean one's wiser
0 likes4 that are in the light, but only God knows how many went under the rug.
1 likeI can just picture this guy is in prison trying to be best friends with the officers.
1790 likesReplies (37)
Blatantly a snitch that thinks they’re all his friends when they would screw him over in a heartbeat
70 likesahahah!
0 likesYeah, he obviously saw himself as some kind of busy body, wannabe cop.
30 likes@KOLLUSION Transistor Funk - Topic please explain how you thought he wanted to be a cop? All I see is a man carrying a gun in a bad neighborhood because people will attack you for no reason like this.
6 likes"Yes sir"
4 likes@PlanBneverFails lol yeah he attacked them by talking to them. Haha.
13 likes@R. M. you’re trying way to hard to get a rouse out of ppl bud.
25 likes@D0P3PRIEST hey some people are violent. There's a reason you lock your doors and roll up windows in some neighborhoods.
8 likesLol
0 likes@R. M. nice trolling, kid. opponents have been neutralized
6 likes@PawlOwl ;)
1 like"negative" - this guy is basically a cop wanna-be
10 likes@PlanBneverFails He got blind sided and shoved to the ground. He was assaulted
4 likes@Tyr he in jail because the state the judge jury and persecution felt he was guilty his life in life not manslaughter
1 like@R. M. if you live in the kind of neighborhood you're painting right now, you wouldn't walk up to some random car and look for a sticker. He knew it might become confrontational. He literally said it in the video.
8 likes@R. M. I think you're the one with the toxic ideas here bud... Good luck with that
9 likes@Simea van Reenen just remember to keep your hands to yourself and you won't get shot, lol
5 likesUnless they have a good, solid PC unit, if he starts kiss up to COs he'd get stomped senseless to the point he'd never think about doing it again. If it continued he'd get wet up.
0 likesYoung bucks now don't give a damn. The order don't need to be given. They smoke people just to watch them bleed.
A lot of prisoners do this. It’s not a bad thing. It’s actually a really smart move.
2 likes@R. M. Yeah right? I dont get why everyone is bashing the guy with the gun just because he defended himself. Yes he was looking for a sticker on the car which could lead to trouble but that is no excuse for the dead guy to charge at him. I am not saying the dead guy was at fault but neither was the guy with the gun. The dead guy should have talked it out, the other guy wouldnt have pulled out the gun and every body would have been safe
4 likes@DaB if the FBI statistic fits, then use it, lol
2 likes@R. M. yeah uh huh i bet youre at least 100 lbs overweight and reek of cigarettes.
5 likes@DaB so this is what you're resulting to? Random personal attacks? Well you're wrong on both accounts and now you're blocked, lol
1 like@R. M. oooo did i offend u by calling u out for being racist? I'm sooooo sorry
6 likesLol I totally see this
0 likes@peps "mansplaining vibes" wtf does that even mean
1 like@peps funny considering I'm either around your age or younger then you but then again your probably 7 😐
1 like@peps 😐 ur like 12 please stop aren't you supposed to be in school
0 likes@peps That was a very uneducated comment. Many people are in school.
2 likes@peps plenty of people in school. Not everyone is scared of the plandemic with a 99.98 percent survival rate. Higher for kids.
1 like@R. M. If you're gonna side with the unpopular opinion, you need to know how to posit your arguments better. Usually the popular opinion is the right one. But it's good practice arguing for the wrong side for those rare times when the popular argument is wrong, cause you'll know how to persuade people better.
0 likesIn this case though, the shooter is clearly some dude who was waiting for an opportunity to shoot someone. I think his hesitation in shooting suggests that he had to think about if it was justified, and it wasn't, but for someone wanting an excuse to use their gun, their mind is gonna justify any little thing.
@R. M. " so this is what you're resulting to?" You meant to say/write, RESORTING to?
1 likeAnyway, you're a good patriotic American. A tad white racist, but a patriot nonetheless.
@R. M. Sure, you "win". Congrats.
0 likes@R. M. You got it! You(re) a genius! I wish there were more people like you in this country. Hahahahah.... Ooops, what does "hahahahahah" mean?
0 likes@R. M. “Hahaha” indeed. Now, in case by some miracle you outgrow your sophomoric talent for self entertainment I could be actually interested in what you have to say. It’s also called “growing up “. You know, when adults discuss things so that they may learn from each other. Which is quite different from talking to yourself so that you can claim “victory “.
0 likesLike I said, it’s part of growing up.
Why are people even trying to argue with R.M.? He should have been ignored the second he tried to justify the shooting of an unarmed man walking away from an altercation he didn’t start. He should have been dismissed a second time when he proved to be an actual racist. He should have definitely been dismissed when he proved to be COVID-denier.
0 likesI mean come on guys, you aren’t going to convince somebody 3 layers (and probably more) deep in their delusions. How anybody liked any of their comments is beyond me, but there are a lot of awful people.
Patrolling the corridors with Jeremy dewitte, unit 1 on the move
0 likesTIMMY! And lords of the underworld!
0 likesThe fact that he felt he was entitled to walk around her car looking for placards as if he was the police is mind boggling. THEN had the audacity to approach her. His only duty at that point was to call the police.
96 likesReplies (6)
checking the vehicle and talking to her aren't morally or legally wrong.....it needn't be audacity. If he feels that telling her is better than trying to get her a ticket that is well within his rights. The shove wasn't legal or moral, the draw was perfectly legal, after the shove the man was walking toward him, during the draw, he stopped, started to back away and turn, therefore the SHOT was 100% illegal and not justified.
2 likes@75ur15 It was actually the audacity as Drejka parked illegally and wanted to call someone out on their faults. McGlockton's gf was pregnant at the time, it wasn't okay to shove but at least it made sense that he was trying to protect her. We can quit the bs and not pretend as if Drejka wasn't looking for a fight and a justification to fire his gun at someone.
7 likes@comp uter based solely on the one instance that conclusion can't be drawn, so no way to know that as the father/husband.....with knowledge of his past i agree with you about him looking for his "chance". Lastly, the shove can't reasonably (imo) be defended as the man is approaching the shooter is more than an arms length from the vehicle, and in his sight she gets out (removing the door as a shield, and the drive away option) and closes the distance by HER choice. can't justify the shove.....that still doesn't make the shot ok. many bad decisions
2 likes@75ur15 He did not care if she got a ticket or not. He is not the police so that is the audacity of him approaching her as if he is the police. He wouldn't have approached her if he didn't have a gun. He wouldn't have approached her if she was white. He saw a black woman and thought he could impose his will over her. He felt, as most racist whites do, that he was teaching the black a lesson.
4 likes@luvbig41 lotta assumptions there chief
1 like@Mars Experience.
1 likeI was hassled in a parking lot before because I didn’t “look handicapped” even though the car I was in had a handicapped placard. I am not handicapped but my mother is and she and my father and aunt were inside the store where we were parked. This person was very aggressive and it’s scary to think how it could have escalated. Also it’s incredibly ignorant for a grown adult to accost someone over “not looking handicapped” when there are many conditions which are not immediately visibly apparent that are eligible for handicapped parking placards.
339 likesReplies (15)
Exactly. Dude needs life! I hope hes on write a prisoner so I can troll him 🤪
10 likesGlad you’re safe & nothing crazy happened
6 likes"Oh you're handicapped? NAME 3 HANDICAPS!"
17 likes‼️‼️‼️
0 likes@Mad Mike *all handicaps
0 likesAs a disabled vet, I worry about this because I don't "look disabled" on my better days.
6 likesIt's also ignorant to walk up and shove someone from behind instead of talking first.
0 likes@jfrsnjhnsn Agreed. That doesn't really have anything to do with what happened to me.
2 likesWell, did you shove the guy too?
0 likes@L 432hz he needs a life but your looking to write him letters to "troll" him? i think you might need life too bro
0 likes@Ruby Tuesday outright outlawing all guns is foolish, and it won't curb gun violence completely, or violence in general. criminals will just get craftier if they can't access formerly-legal guns as easy. dangerous explosives are outlawed, yet we still see those being used to hurt people, right?
0 likesdon't want to start political discourse in the comments, but i can promise you as a person in a right to carry state, gun violence isn't as common as you think it is. yes, gun violence is a very troubling issue in the u.s., but not enough to warrant taking away the weapons that give us the right to defend ourselves in case our government gets too corrupt.
Don’t you have the handicap sign you in your windshield?
0 likes@Vacherie De Vacherie Yes, this person was angry and confrontational over the fact that I "didn't look handicapped."
0 likes@guildpactminish if you have the sign, you have the sign. Don’t even answer them.
1 likeI don’t get why anyone tries to make it their business? Who cares if someone parks in a handicap spot, whether you think they’re handicapped or not , who are you to make that judgement, you don’t know them or their situation? I’ve carted around my mother in law without a placard because she’d accidentally leave it in her car, and she was legitimately handicapped. I’ve parked in the handicapped spot at the gas station when I was 9mos pregnant and my feet were so swollen I could feel the water sloshing when I shook my foot. Although I didn’t have a placard nor was I handicapped, I had parked at a gas station that literally had one car parked at the pump. It’s not up to you to play judge, jury and (literally) executioner. I just don’t get why people can’t mind their own business.(By you I don’t mean OP in general, or anyone else on this thread, just adding to the conversation so please don’t think I’m being a jerk😌)
0 likesYeah dude…he fired the gun as his pusher was backing up. The pusher saw the gun, realized he was about to get shot and started backing up, and 2 seconds later (one-hippopotamus-two-hippopotamus) he THEN fired. That’s NOT self defense. He shot him for revenge.
724 likesReplies (21)
you put it perfectly. this was revenge. being pushed over, even if it was sudden, the victim was not actively attacking him when he took his gun out. literally if my partner & 2 of my kids are in the car and there is a freakin' guy screaming at them, i certainly go into protection mode.
111 likesExactly what I saw, he pushed him and immediately ceased combat, even backing off, and this was initiated by the guy with the gun, he was out of lines the minute he took it into his own hands against a woman.
29 likesIf he had such an issue, his options were call the cops or notify the store manager, anything outside of that became grounds for confrontation.
It's appropriate you show your fire-arm FIRST before making the shot. It's to show the attacker they'll most likely lose everything within a few seconds.
12 likesI don't think it was "revenge". I think it was more that he believed the push gave him justification to fire unless the other guy turned and ran away. Backing up a few steps wasn't enough to show that the other guy was disengaging from the fight.
37 likesPulling the gun was enough. If it had ended there I think all parties involved would have been justified in their actions.
Confronting a person parked in a handicap spot without placards, not necessary but justified.
Shoving the guy screaming at your wife and children not necessary but justified.
Pulling a gun on the guy that shoved you to the ground, not necessary but justified.
Shooting that man, not necessary and not justified.
@John Glass Killing someone purely because you think it can be justified legally is actually worse than killing someone because you're angry and want revenge- it's calculating and cold-blooded. Also, walking away from someone is pretty much the most basic definition of disengaging from a fight- anyone who got in a fight as a kid will probably have been told 'next time, just walk away'. Given his history of threatening people with his gun in other instances, you might well be right about his motivation, though- he seems overly preoccupied with the idea of shooting someone, and may have been looking for any excuse.
41 likes@John Glass Perfect, balanced summation there (without the crock of sh*t some others are spouting on here).
3 likesProblem with guns is that some use them out of all proportion to the situation; simply showing the pistol would have worked (most probably). Some people tend to go 'Route 1' when armed.
@Gavin H showing the gun actually did work, that guy was backing down according to his body language. I'm sure his words were not so friendly, but words are not enough to justify shooting.
13 likesWhen people are free to posses arms there will be tragedies.
When people are not free to posses arms there will be genocides.
@John Glass your reasoning is spot on
1 like@John Glass I agree with that. If he would have shot a second earlier I think he gets off. It looked to me like he was about to get kicked in the face before he pulled the gun.
1 like@John Glass cool analysis
0 likes@John Glass
3 likesNot defending the murderers actions at all.
But pushing someone to the ground is assault and is not justified, even if someone is shouting at your loved ones.
Exactly
0 likes@Verena Valo
0 likesAnd depending on what you do, you might get shot
that’s right. multi cultural societies don’t work. white men are being challenged in our countries and this is the result(it’s gonna get way worse)
0 likes@stay triggered snowflakes … what?
3 likes@Hit Rapper and Artist Dababy I have no idea... No idea at all... 🤦
1 likeWrong it was not revenge. It was murder. He waited whole life to some victim gives him "lawful reason". Unfortunately for him, there was a camera, victim reacted perfectly and BLM changed in america a lot. But because his intent was to kill someone in fact anyone, it is clearly 1st degree murder and because of circumstance (killing father in front of family) he should get injection.
0 likes@squarecracker WTF, open ur eyes man. Thats not true. He just pushed him away and then he back up. He didnt do anything to let the other guy feeling he should put out his gun. Ur just crazy as this guy.
0 likes@John Glass hey man, that’s a little too much logic for a YouTube comment section. Gonna need you to tone it down, champ.
0 likes@John Glass It is not justified shoving somebody like that for merely screaming, at whomever that might be. He lost his life because of that, plain and simple. Don't write stupid things like that making people belive violence is allowed at the cost of verbal onslaught. Children at school would get shoved every each day, and that's just wrong. Not justified.
0 likes@Verena Valo to be fair I would have approached the situation by telling my wife to roll up her window and talk to the guy myself.
0 likesIf there’s one thing this channel has taught me it’s don’t name a child Michael
1337 likesReplies (46)
Little Mac has spoken.
19 likesShit
49 likesHALLOWEEN
7 likesFreal. There are 3 micheals within a span of 5 videos. And in one of them, another criminal named michael is mentioned.
24 likes🤣😅 ✅ noted
4 likesGosh darn dang it
10 likesNice pic 😂 🥊
1 like🤨
12 likesMichael is a cursed name. My older brother, Michael, would hit me so often as a kid that I can't break my habits related to it in my adult life. For example, I can't leave my bedroom door open without feeling like a threat could be coming through the doorway. Not to complain about minor trauma, but Michael is indeed a very cursed name.
12 likes@Giovanni Aguirre I literally just noticed that and I’m upset because my name is Michael
8 likesI dated a Michael and can confirm that it’s bad ju-ju.
7 likesY’all wild
3 likesthat's my dad's name! thankfully the most cursed things he has ever done were limited to wearing shorts in below-freezing weather (he still does this), and accidentally ripping a door off its hinges once lol
6 likesMy brother is a Michael and hes a hero
2 likesWell shiiieeet, my middle name is michael, guess mom wanted me to become a murderer.....
2 likesI think i finally found out why im a disappointment :)
YES! (BTW, "Peterson" is the most dangerous surname!)
4 likesI'll make sure to remember that.
2 likesJust another Michael passing through.
2 likesMichaels are dangerous
0 likesHave a father and a cousin Michael and can confirm
0 likesToo late.....
0 likesEven games know this
1 likeJaws music intensifies
1 likeOne of the reasons i go by Mickey lol
1 likeHi
2 likesWhat about Micheal Jordan, Micheal Phelps, Micheal Collins?
1 like@Willy Pete lol exactly
0 likes😔
1 likegoogle search "top boys names in the 80s" and guess what name was #1 at that time? So it's no surprise that there are a bunch of youngish and middle-aged men today are named Michael. This is simple statistics and nothing to do with the name itself.
0 likesOr Chris
0 likesHAHA!
0 likesOof... In our defense, Michael is like the 2nd most common name in the world behind Mohammad I think lmao
4 likes;(
1 like@MICHAEL CHUKWU same
0 likesIt’s so hit or miss lol like you either get Michael Jordan, Michael Phelps or Michael Myers lol Mike Tyson was pretty much both leaning towards Phelps and Jordan these days
0 likesMichael is an incredibly common name.
0 likesMy mom said that . For certain reasons.
0 likesWhat about Michael jackson
0 likeshaha i hate my name
0 likesThe Name Michael means who is like God or Gift from God although the name doesn't fit or match everyone given the name it isnt the name that is the problem its the bad choices humans make in their lives
0 likesThe first guy in the video guilty until proven innocent from this channel was named Michael
0 likesThe guy who got shot is also named Michael
0 likes@LxlShyne well luckily anyone from here who can't read katakana wouldn't be able to tell
1 likeWell my name is Karen. I have never asked to speak to the manager and the Karen memes and the behaviour of those people makes me cringe. I don't relate. So yeh we don't choose our names we choose our behaviour.
0 likesNot gonna lie, four Mikes in my family and all of the douchebags (alcoholics, child abuser, cheater, wife beater). Then there was the one co-worker named Mike who OD'd and died. And the other co-worker who was a nice enough guy, but almost had a stroke at work due to his severe diabetes...not his fault but damn. It's like a curse. lol
0 likesDespite understanding that Micheal is a very common name, I am a bit dubious when I meet a new person with the name. I have Mike PTSD. 😆
Hi
0 likesDon’t go to 7/11 for snacks folks
1 like👍👍👍
0 likesthe second hand embarrassment from him fashioning a sling for his arm is unparalleled
1639 likesReplies (17)
this is the comment that i was looking for.
35 likesSomeone saw No Country For Old Men and thought he'd be a badass.
36 likesfrrr
0 likes@ReMattch 💀💀💀💀
1 likeWhite boy was milking it! Surprised he didn’t come in the interrogation room in a wheelchair. Always gotta play the victim
49 likes@Caleb Money hollis What do you mean
3 likes@Mike The "always gotta play the victim" part.
5 likesDude . Seriously .
2 likes@John J he was playing the victim by putting his arm in a sling trying to garner sympathy and pretending to be hurt, it’s pathetic
16 likes@nyx literally 😆
0 likesWeird how it was working just fine when he was holding his gun. Now he’s all “i can’t shake hands because i have an owie!”
3 likesJust like how he got up, put his gun in his car, then sat down on the ground again, because “big scary black man pushed me”
@Caleb Money hollis foo acting like he broke his arm. Meanwhile killed a good father. This guy probably a horrible father. Smells like beer and gunpowder I bet
2 likes@banjaxeguitars banjaxeguitars nah. 20 years in prison.
0 likesDude saw Taxi Driver and said “he’s just like me fr”
1 likeMISTER MOONEY(I luv lucy) IN COURT
0 likes@Caleb Money hollis this is racist lol
0 likes@banjaxeguitars banjaxeguitars
1 like1) he also illegally parked
2) being shoved to the ground once is not “being ground into the pavement”
3) ferociously? really?
4) the father, who was murdered in front of his own kid, was walking away
did you even watch the video ?
Damn I want to watch this but 8 different ads in 15 minutes
0 likes"Were you in the service?"
6449 likes"Yes'sir"
"Which branch?"
"US Postal"
Replies (35)
They have been known to be pretty deadly.
419 likes@Daniel Martin So after reading your comment I thought "oh yeah, that lady that murdered a ton of her former coworkers in Cali" but I couldn't remember her name, so I googled "postal worker shooting" and DAMN. I now know where the phrase going postal comes from...
226 likes@Daniel Martin especially their special forces branch.
88 likes@Liz C and there was the Edmond Oklahoma post office massacre in the 80s.
22 likesLOL
5 likes"Social Security, I've been collecting for years after falling in a DMV"
9 likesNo fuckin way! Did he say that and I missed it?🤣🤣
25 likesLOLLLL you sir won the internet
5 likesHAHAHA I never usually laugh out loud at comments, but this made me belly laugh
11 likeswell he went postal allright..
11 likesHey hey hey now. They deliver in rain and sleet and snow. Have some respect 😂
18 likesfunny lol
2 likes"Going postal"
6 likes"I'm pretty sore." What an absolute clown. As a supporter of the second amendment, people like this should never be allowed to own a gun. Him and Jeremy Dewitte would probably be best friends. Shooting an unarmed man cause he pushed you after getting into an argument with someone who was minding their own business. He's a big ol' boy too. Everything about this guy screams academy drop out. The lesson: don't park in a handicapped space without placards or this guy will shoot someone you're with.
21 likesHahahahahaha
2 likesHAH that is amazing
2 likes🤣
2 likes@Alpha ω Damn, thin postal line.
2 likes@Daniel Martin us postals surpass the marines at this point
3 likesThe Salvation Army 😂
5 likesSpecial needs forces
1 like@Gutter Bear lowkey i feel like taking away his guns and permit forever and giving him a milder sentence would absolutely wreck him as a person and push him to rethink his actions far more than 20 years
2 likesBranch? Cutting trees
1 likeThere's a reason the head of the postal service is called the Postmaster General.
1 likeIronically the postal service "serves" the usa much more then its army. Especially domestically.
4 likes😂😂😂
0 likesDecember 21st, 1989
6 likesThe letters are becoming too much. My position is overrun and I'm buried up to my eyes in packages. Letters to santa are flying over my head. I think Jimmy got taken out by a paper cut. I pray the communique demanding better overtime pay reaches HQ. In the meanwhile, I write to you, dearest Wilma. I know it will not get to you soon, because I have far too many letters to deliver before I can come home. I don't know if I'll even see the next sunset.... As I have to sleep for work the next day.
LMAO!!
0 likesi legit cackled
1 like@Daniel Martin 🤣
0 likesJROTC!
2 likesLMAO
1 like😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
0 likes@TurtleSauceGaming lmao great job
0 likes@Daniel Martin it’s more than deadly, PAPERCUTS... oh god THE PAPERCUTS
0 likesDon't talk to the police
0 likesHe was totally milking that arm-injury.
4095 likesReplies (42)
Absolutely trying to concentrate as much as he can from it
74 likesDude made his shirt into a fucking sling 🤦🏻♂️
256 likeshe had to pretend he was hurt in order to justify the innocents man murder
158 likesHamming it up quite a bit, yes.
21 likes@Scoots McGee really? Didnt even notice it was his shirt
12 likesTbh that fall should've hurt a lot. Guns are quite tough
2 likes@RZVT he could have just really heavily emphasized his fear of darkness
6 likesOh for sure.
3 likesFor sure! Almost pulled a muscle rolling my eyes so hard "left hand please sir" 🙄 "when he hit me from behind" no, sir, just no
21 likesWhite Alliance ... Dang it... I watched it.
4 likesPlaying it alright!
2 likes@RZVT well the man was not innocent he still pushed the dude. I know he's dead but that doesn't mean we have to pretend that he shouldn't have pushed that guy. The dude that shot him Is a piece of shit and should be in prison for a long time but that dude got slammed. That isn't "nothing."
5 likes@Jerel Wayne Florida has stand your ground law.
0 likesButtercup58 ... Thats true. Also nobody has the right to shoot people as they flee in fear.
4 likesAt 20.34 his arm is fixed
3 likesi didn't see any milk come out of it 😕
1 like@Swamp hawk, this loser scraped his elbow pulling out that gun! His elbow was hurt and so was his pride/feelings!
2 likesIn the first part of the interrogation, he uses the scrapped up arm/elbow freely, and then intermittently, throughout the investigation/interrogation. WHAT?!!!
@Chaldean Guy Wasn't really a strawman... Unless it was a joke/sarcasm, Andrew seemed to infer with his 'he could have hit his head and died' statement (nevermind that he was hit from the side so hitting his head in the fall would've be highly unlikely) that he was saying that either both attacks were equal or that the response with the gun was justified.
0 likes@Chaldean Guy Now who's employing a strawman here... He said more than that. The second-half of his comment was telling when he said the guy could've been killed. Not only is a death from a push like that unlikely since Drejka was shoved from his side, but that random part of the comment speaks to more that just an "observation"... He wasn't simply stating anything...
2 likes@rachybaby72, omg, you really are that dense, eh? Andrew said the guy wasn't innocent, because he attacked first. Whether he died from the fall or not, is irrelevant, as it has nothing to do with the innocence of the man being killed. You're grasping at straws, here.
0 likes@Chaldean Guy Sorry, you defending the dude who pulls guns on women for no reason?
1 like@Andrew Jackson He literally pulled a gun on 4 different people and 2 of them being women. He was looking to pull it and knowing his past probably would've anyway. He was also lying.
2 likes@Niceock man, how am I defending him? I've already stated, he shouldn't have shot him. What I'm arguing is, how the guy that pushed him isn't innocent, either! Those two idiots were pulling straw mans left and right.
1 like@Chaldean Guy He is though. All the dude did was push him because he was harassing his girl. Also, what's the point of even pointing it out unless you're suggesting something?
1 like@Niceock man, you don't touch someone, unless they touch you or touch someone else (if not in self-defense). The whole point Andrew was making was that the guy who pushed him wasn't innocent. That's a fact. Whether he brought up he could've died from the push or not is irrelevant; the guy who pushed him wasn't innocent.
1 like@CanadianPYRO 604 WTF? What would you have done if some stranger was in your loved ones face? Ask them kindly to stop?
0 likes@Buttercup58 Uhm yeah they do. Its called PROTECTING LIFE AND PROPERTY
0 likes@blazeaglory, I would have gotten in between him and my wife, but not touch him, until he touched me, first. That's the law, something you guys clearly don't understand. Doesn't matter how loud someone's yelling at your wife/child/friend, etc...You don't put your hands on people. Seriously, I stopped thinking like you guys, when I got to high school. He's not innocent; live with it.
0 likesJerel Wayne do you make people wanna push you? It’s not normal for that to happen to people over a dozen times.
0 likesThat barely fall...
1 likeHe seems like the kind of guy who tips 8 percent and says "get a better paying job"
2 likeswell he was violently assaulted , is he supposed to pretend he was not hurt?
1 likeHe doesn't look that hurt to me... 29:39
0 likes@Scoots McGee yeah the average person wouldn't think of that, it was actually cool I learned something BUT that suggests survivalist training to me along with all his other jargon
0 likesLike it was a war wound
0 likesIkr, you’d had to be pushed by the Rock to have such an injury.
1 likeIt had no bearing, we know he got knocked down. Even if he went to the hospital for x-rays it wouldn't have changed a thing. Once the assailant/victim started backing up - it was over.
1 likewe all saw him waving his right arm around, right? if your shoulder was that badly injured you would not be able to raise it above your head. Is his arm sore? yeah probably but just take some tylenol and he should be fine
0 likesHowling 🤣
1 like'Arm injury'
1 like🤣🤣🤣🤣👍🏼👍🏼
1 like@Scoots McGee 🤣
0 likes“Paramedics arrived in 19mins” OMG 😱 I’m a paramedic and that’s just an ABSURD response time 😞
2142 likesReplies (57)
That stood out to me too.
208 likesYes! Amongst other things, this was also apart of the problem!
84 likesout of everything in this video that hurt the most.
101 likesEspecially after being shot
52 likesThey heard black male shot and said let's take our merry time.
198 likesYeah, pretty abysmal.
9 likesThey were probably in one of those areas where a single station services 4-5 of the local towns, response times always suck as a result. It's really a shame.
78 likes@Wize Wolf comments like this are why there will forever be division in society. Eternal victim mentality
54 likes@Beyond Backwater so because of a random person commenting on YouTube there will forever be division? Lmao. Come on dude you don't even understand sarcasm. Sad.
69 likes@Jack Churchill man I wonder what about the town made someone think one small station was enough? 🤔
12 likesikr?? EMS in my city are en route 2 mins after a call & there within 7 minutes of leaving the station. wtf happened there?
4 likes@Wize Wolf if that was sarcasm I'm not sure you do either.
16 likes@Jason Weaver Bystander effect
7 likes@Wize WolfPara: Mickey D's has that new nugget special guys
2 likesIf only you saw how slow paramedics in the dc area drive
1 likeProbably response time plus police clearing scene time time on patient kinda stuff
3 likes@Maria Gabrielle Not everything. But many things are still. Because this is America.
7 likesI was thinking the same thing. 19 minutes. Craziness.
1 like@Still Sidda How am I pretending to be a victim? I honestly believe cops, hospitals and the like treat minorities different. You don't have to agree. I don't care.
17 likesThats a long time for sure but with a bullet going through the lungs and heart, i doubt they could've done much anyways.
3 likes@Beyond Backwater youre so dramatic lol
1 like@Still Sidda L
3 likes@Wize Wolf don’t argue with people who can’t see, or refuse to things from black peoples perspective. There’s really no point in it because what you’re saying has been proved time and time again but there’s always going to be those people who will argue you to the death because they would hate to accept it. It’s a loss, just focus your energy on keeping yourself safe from it.
13 likesIf it was a white guy, they would’ve arrived sooner.
3 likesAll lives matter!
@Nicholas Ramey if people are dying because they had a slow response time then they do lmfaooo
2 likes@Jack Churchill Indeed.
0 likes@Nicholas Ramey whatever you say buddy 😅
1 like@Maria Gabrielle Stay blind
0 likes@Still Sidda You who ignore the truth in your face.
0 likes@Myraven Appleberry Exactly
0 likesI work in the tenth busiest ems system in the us as a paramedic... That's normal for us.
3 likesNext unit available all day long.
Must not work for a busy service lol .. it’s a shame how low staffed EMS is these days and people calling for bs reasons ( calls that do not require an ambulance and are not life threatening) is what causes us to not have trucks available for serious calls like that.. been a medic for 8 years and it’s only getting worse.. not to mention PD has to arrive and clear the scene before EMS can even work the patient.. also depends how long it took to call 911 as well.. a lot of factors..
4 likes@Still Sidda "even including the excessive racism towards white people" yeah, as a white person, this tipped me off to not take you seriously at all lol. Sorry you're unfamiliar with the ABUNDANCE of research that shows that minorities ARE treated worse within several american institutions than white people - including in Healthcare, the justice system, & in educational institutions. It seems you just want them to shut up about the injustice they face. Sorry people speaking up for themselves hurts your sensibilities so much
7 likesIt might be a really small town far from dispatch. I live in a town like that and EMS is always 30 minutes or more away whenever we call for an ambulance.
2 likesThat's part right but if you put in consideration the people who take to much time to stop or move over to the side or stop on the traffic lights to let the emergency vehicle pass
1 like@Beyond Backwater racism is a very real thing that black people have faced since the atlantic slave trade when white people invented race. very weird that you're blaming black people for recognizing that as an issue that affects us. you're actually the reason why this wont get solved, you wont take accountability for perpetuating racism.
0 likesPathetic really.
0 likes19min. What a joke. The paramedics should be charged as well.
0 likes@ShamW0Wzer pretty normal in Toronto
0 likesThat's exactly how my mother died too. Paramedics took 45 minutes, for some strange reason. She was kept alive by my aunt via CPR but you know what can happen when your heart fails for too long aaa..
1 likedepends where you live
0 likesIn argentina if u get shot and call paramedics, they will arrive in 1-5 hours minimum, if u are not that lucky they probably dont arrive, but in EE UU 19 minutes is a lot...
1 like@el colito really depends, in Germany there are towns in the Mecklenburgerische Seenplatte Area where 20 minutes is a minimum
0 likesResponse time and training are probably the biggest factors in someone living and dying. I’ve overdosed quite a few times. Friends of mine overdosed once and never came back. They say 3 minutes, but I’ve seen someone come back after 8. Couldn’t walk for a while though
0 likesMy 3 year old nephew had passed out, gone limp and turned blue while out with his parents apartment hunting the other day. It took over 25 minutes for the paramedics to arrive :/
0 likesMy mom was an EMT for 25 years and that made me cringe
0 likesI live in Victoria Australia in a regional country town. Our nearest hospital is 45 mins away. 19 mins would be fast for an ambulance to get to us ...
0 likesLol in South Africa it can be 8 hours 😂😂
0 likesThose response times are criminal, a politician somewhere has a lot to answer for
0 likesI was rear ended by someone driving 110 and the paramedics took 45 minutes to get to me
0 likesI thought that’s disgusting….but, the neighborhood must be busy
0 likes@Wize Wolf not really what he was getting the YouTube part is irrelevant your thinking is what's a problem
0 likes@Dan Lienheart My thinking is that Marquise should still be alive.
0 likes@Wize Wolf lmao living with that mindset, unbelievable
0 likesWhere I used to live there was a 45 minute response time, that is if there were any ambulances around at all. If there weren't you could expect an hour and a half. Don't even want to think about if something like this happened.
0 likesNot for a homicide. Our medics stage until the scene is secure. It could be 19 minutes depending on the chaos.
0 likes@ShamW0Wzer EMTs in my district have to travel 55minutes to get from one end to the other end of the area
0 likesThere are a lot of wanna be cop/wanna be tough guy, vigilantes, who don’t need to be carrying firearms. This guy is one of them.
355 likesReplies (8)
@Blackhand Spectre I wouldn’t disagree with that either
1 like@Blackhand Spectre Looks to me like a man defending his family from a Karen that had too much time with too little to do. He had a right to pull the gun, but he is a coward for making the decision to elevate the situation. You two are cowards as well for condoning this, what he shouldve done is take their plates and have the man reported for assault , but because of his rash decision and bad temper, two families are affected and without male figures.
24 likes@Blackhand Spectre 🤦🏾♂️most men would push someone who’s shouting at their wife.
12 likes@———————————— only the ones that haven’t seen this video.
2 likesIt was a good clean kill
@Blackhand Spectre shove =/ shot while walking away
2 likes@Blackhand Spectre He got 20 years too so the jury didn't agree...he probably won't make it 20 years..hope the parking spot was worth it lol
3 likes@sean dent Defending his family from what, impotent whining? Maybe if he'd learned to distinguish between an annoyance and a threat he'd still be alive and his children's last memories of him wouldn't involve being ventilated for trying to be a badass.
5 likesabsolutely agree
1 likeThis is one of the reasons america shouldn't have guns
1 likeI think people that defend Drejka fail to realize that he could have handled this situation so much more reasonably by telling his victim to back off and then pressing charges for assault. Instead he murdered a man who backed off at the sight of his gun. There are solutions other than murder. The dude didn't even have a weapon for crying out loud.
443 likesReplies (30)
Would you say the outcome would be different if there where stricter laws that maybe made it illegal to carry a concealed fire arm in public? Or maybe even make it harder to get a gun? Or would you say that maybe stricter gun laws all around could have made these incidents alot les frequent?
25 likesI think most people who defend him can also empathize over the fact that people make mistakes. When you are suddenly attacked and you get a surge of adrenaline, your vision, your sense of time, judgement, etc. - all can get clouded. The reality of this case is that it was an unfortunate misunderstanding with no intentionos to kill from either party.
30 likes@ThisIsMeArnold that sounds like the perfect argument against weapons
53 likes@ZebraJess92 People do the same thing with knives, umbrellas, bare hands smashing a head against the pavement. I'm not trying to argue for or against guns, I'm only talking about this criminal case. Sometimes people just need to accept that unfortunate misunderstandings happpen.
12 likes@Busky yh then mainly criminals would have guns PERFECT. I live in a country where it's illegal to own guns... Guess what criminals still have guns and ordinary citizens can't protect themselves
22 likes@ThisIsMeArnold It literally takes less than a second to pull a trigger, whereas stabbing/beating someone up is an act that takes way longer, maybe even minutes. Dont tell me he would have beat him to death in his "lapse of judgement". From what I`ve seen he just could have not shot. That easy. He maybe pushed him (which wasnt great) but he didnt proceed to attack him, so it definitly wasnt self defence and I understand what you mean when you talk about getting a adrenaline rush, but even if that was the case it doesnt make him not guilty, it doesnt make that round un-shot. It doesnt change anything in my opinion. And you could use the "People make mistakes" argument for any case.
12 likes@Jonathan Rampersad Whether legal or not, thats still lesser guns. In which country do you live?
5 likes@tomtomtom There's a difference between approaching a person, blasting them in the head, grabbing their wallet, running and being suddenly attacked, shooting a gun in retaliation. Also I think it's safe to assume there was no intention to kill. That is also very significant. The man got a 20 year sentence and this year he was already attacked and wounded in the prison. Some people get shorter sentences for intentional murder of their own kids. In my opinion it isn't fair to paint this man as some evil criminal who deserves to suffer. That's the typical public sentiment around this case.
9 likes@ThisIsMeArnold If you dont intend on killing someone, then maybe dont shoot them in the chest? He could have just held him at gunpoint and backed off, but he decided to pull the trigger. I am not throught the whole video yet so I cant say anything about the setencing, but as OP already said there was a solution other shooting that guy, maybe he is made out to be worse than he really is, but he is still the sole reason he is where he is now
11 likesThomas Gerl not to mention the man also took two steps back when the gun was pulled so it’s not like he was going to try to kick him (his words “I thought kicks were coming”) the man saw him yelling at his wife and kids and pushed him, there was no chance the man on the ground would be killed
6 likesThisIsMeArnold if you can’t control yourself, you shouldn’t have a weapon
3 likesYeah because our INJUSTICE system would totally help him track down the scumbag attacker to place the charges. Fists ARE a weapon. It's not murder, it was self defense. The jury is WRONG. This is a win for THUGGERY. It is now acceptable to violently assault somebody, because the victim is no longer allowed to fight back.
2 likesYou could also like, not circle a car like it's a fucking gazelle n you're hungry, and mind your business about someone taking a parking spot for 5 minutes.
4 likesIt's not defending him. Fact is if you approach someone with violence you're likely to get violence back. Unfortunately on this occasion the person who had violence brought upon them was a coward with a gun. Lesson to be learned here is learn to have dialogue before pushing/shooting someone.
0 likes@Busky laws won't prevent human tragedy my guy. Stricter gun laws means average citizens can't protect themselves. We can't always rely on the police and attacking that right isn't the answer.
5 likesHe could have handled it better but so could the "victim", who initiated the violence. He brought hands to a gunfight.
4 likesWell, the same goes for the desisted guy, He could give some warning first too,, what happened to good old talking and arguing? lol, they are both guilty, two bullies !!!!
1 likeThe redrumers in Chicago should take this advice
0 likes@Ocean Man Definitely agree with that. Coming out of the store, I'd definitely give a loud, "hey!" to get the guy's attention away from my wife and engaged with me while I'm still far enough away to assess the situation. However, I'd probably still have gotten shot because I'd also still be moving towards the guy just so we didn't have to yell from 20 feet away. Trouble is, I'm sure Michael trained a fair amount. Probably on his own or with like-minded people (ie not professional security/self-defense experts). In his mind, any altercation WOULD escalate to deadly force, so that's all he trained for. Once he felt he was threatened, he was on autopilot. There was no concept of de-escation or disengagement--it was on a course he had completely predetermined in his mind a hundred times already. Heck, I bet the victim could've turned around and ran and Michael would've shot him in the back saying, "he was going to get a weapon to bash my skull in--I had no other choice to save my life."
1 like@J T I mean if some one was yelling at your wife would you not want to beat that dude up?
1 like@ThisIsMeArnold He clearly had intentions to kill. You DO NOT pull your weapon out unless you intend to use it. Guns are not tools to intimidate people. They are to kill. I'm a responsible gun owner who has been in this situation with a gun on me. I DID NOT pull my weapon out. I did take a punch to the face but managed to get out of there. If they had wrestled me I would have used it. Because if they took it from me I was dead. But it never went that far. And I didn't feel it was life threatening. I'm not in jail right now because I chose to not use my gun when it wasn't called for. He is in jail for being a psychopath.
1 likeExactly, he shouldve taken her plate number and reported it to the police. Thats reasonable and adult like 👌
0 likesAlso notate he could’ve minded his own business and went on about his business. He wasn’t an officer of the law and had no business approaching anyone but because they were black he felt it was his God given right to correct them.
0 likesHands can be deadly weapons..
0 likesIf you pull your gun and don't shoot, you will be charged with a slew of crimes.
Don't pull, unless you're prepared to discharge.
@Jonathan Rampersad I live in a country with heavily restricted gun use. Yes I can't have an assault rifle. ..and in exchange for that? We've never had a mass shooting. Not one. And 'mistakes' like this don't ducking happen. Perfect trade off ino
0 likes@Jose Sosa LOL, that's a completely ridiculous assumption. If you want to know the reality - ask the guy himself.
0 likesThe dead thug could have handled this situation better by not VIOLENTLY shoving somebody simply because he didn't like the harmless words that were being said.
1 like@J T Some sensible words, finally.
0 likesI’m licensed to carry concealed weapons in my state, and I’m surprised this wasn’t a second degree murder charge. When you carry a gun you have a responsibility to keep everyone around you safe, and that starts by NOT being an egotistical ass that ordains himself the enforcer of ADA compliance. You choose to put that gun everyday, the people around don’t choose to have a loaded weapon concealed from them feet away, and we need to respect that. It’s a microchasm of determining how someone handles power that they’re given. Do you use it to elevate yourself, or to serve others who don’t have it? If somebody illegally parks in a handicap spot, politely let the STORE know and go on about your day. The best outcome you can get as someone carrying a lethal weapon is to de-escalate a violent situation to the point where nobody gets hurt. He escalated this, maneuvering himself into a verbal altercation that escalated and ending the argument with a pistol like he lives on a pirate ship... tells me he was looking for trouble and found it. He bought himself 20 years of prison food.
1 like@Jonathan Rampersad Same. I wish more honest citizens were armed. This whole situation was caused by two violent men overreacting instead of de-escalating the situation. Using this as if it was the normal way people would react is disingenuous.
0 likesThebdude backed up because he pulled out the gun but the queation is what the dude would have done had he not pulled out the gun
0 likesReplies (1)
maybe was going to say "my bad" and lend him a hand?
0 likes19 minutes? C'mon America....
0 likesThe fact that the dude had previous incidents threatening people with guns is scary.
349 likesReplies (8)
And now in Texas you don’t even need a license to carry a gun anymore. Feels like the country is moving backwards
10 likesPeople have the right to be armed… but people like him do not.
0 likes@Ant Dav you haven’t need a permit in New Hampshire for decades and they certainly don’t have epic levels of violence there.
0 likes@your Girrrl and who decides who gets to keep a gun and who doesn't? We're in really ambiguous territory cause people's character comes into play here. Something that can't be measured with a gauge. That's why we have laws
0 likes@your Girrrl literally no one has the right to harm anyone with lethal force, allowing people to own lethal weapons such as a firearm is encouraging shootings, murders homicides (etc.) to happen
2 likes@Ant Dav 98% of gun owners don’t act like this
1 like@May Sanchez Then it's not an issue of relieving the remaining 2% of their weapons, if they're provocative and trigger happy like mr Drejka.
0 likes@May Sanchez That's a lot of words for someone unable to form a coherent sentence.
0 likesThe real victim is the kid, had to watch his father die, and now has to grow up without a father.
1194 likesReplies (62)
Yes..this idiots actions are gonna have a ripple effect with those kids and cause so many issues down the road.
54 likesActually I’m pretty sure the guy who got shot and killed was the victim too
110 likes@Mom’s Cat Videos they didn't say he wasn't...?
11 likes@Kei “real victim” implies that the person who died wasn’t actually the victim, and instead the son. Maybe they didn’t mean it and were trying to sound deep or w/e
57 likes@CamCritical How was the father violent? Guy was harassing his wife and kids, he gives him a lovetap of a push, guess he can die now.
23 likesLike Batman
2 likes@G l i c k hOw WaS hE vIoLeNt
8 likesIdk bro. Maybe the battery that’s on video?
@CamCritical So are you saying that shove, that had all the power of a speeding snail behind it, was worthy of being shot to death?
29 likesAnd it took 19mins for anyone to show up!! I wonder, if he would have survived if paramedics showed up sooner..
12 likes@PandaKitty come on, kitty, you know you may give orders to your guinea pig at your best.
0 likes@Martin Bjalončik it’s called defending your scared girlfriend who’s being yelled at by a random man. Yes he could have solved it without a shove but that in no way justifies being shot
23 likesThat’s what hurt my heart the most ! That little baby will carry that trauma forever. And he feels no remorse what so ever .
4 likes@Old Ironsides no, you do not get to pin this on her. Micheal Drejka shot a man in cold blood when he was in no danger.
13 likesLol prob doesnt mean anything, his parents werent married and they probably wouldve broken up so kid was gonna grow up without a father anyways.
1 likeIf the father's first response to someone arguing with his girlfriend is to immediately go to physical violence and attack someone, then he would not have been able to teach that kid a great many things worth of value. Uncivilized brutes, on both ends of the gun.
2 likes@Asma Daud Judging by your comment, Asma, I guess there is more that you don't understand, not only my ease.
2 likesYes, you are certainly alowed to guess whatever you wish. Just let me comment that your thought/premise is just a moronic prejudice. I do not care about that guy's colour at all. I just hate that kind of violent primitivism.
@Grace V I like how martin never responded man know he lost lol
0 likes@Martin Bjalončik and it's not violent to shoot someone dead for pushing you? You're not making sense.
4 likes@pearswah lmaoo ikr, but still replying to other people meaning he definitely saw my comment lol
2 likes@Rumchata ratchet ???? You have let anti blackness jump out immediately you didn’t even try to hide it .By defending herself from creep that feels entitled to take the law into his own hands I will be labeled as “ratchet” Like I said these comments are exposing y’all racism. The fact you label someone ratchet bc of emotions running high is disgusting. Bc you will never refer to a white expressing herself as ratchet. Please please before you even respond just comprehend what I said. Why do you people hate us so much ? Why do you think we can’t feel pain, emotions, like any other human being. Why can’t y’all give us the decency to be a human.
3 likes@Asma Daud I believe what I see with my own two eyes, I don't need some spirits of the ancestors bullshit to confirm what is video evidence.
0 likes@Mom’s Cat Videos he’s the victim but he definitely could’ve prevented being a victim
0 likes@Dee Riggs He was defending himself.
0 likes@Avocado Toast the brutalit and ignorance you would so like to show that you are fighting are in your own silly words.
0 likes@Asma Daud well, for a moment it seemed you can realise how stupid your arguments and acusations are. But then... there you go again!
0 likes@Martin Bjalončik I am just curious. Would you ? Kill my over a parking spot ? Honest question? One can conclude from your argument that you would.
0 likes@Martin Bjalončik and your argument is immoral. What your point ?
0 likesThat's deep
0 likesYou do know that people remarry, right? I guess not.
0 likes@G l i c k "Lovetap" Pushed him to the ground. You do realise if you push someone they can fall wrong and hit their head right? Don't get physical with someone unless they're doing the same.
0 likes@G l i c k i know someone that is doing prison because of one of those "lovetap of a push". He was working as a bodyguard, an inebriated person got into his face which made him push the guy back. That guy hit his head and died in the hospital.
0 likesAT LLEAST HE LEARNED TO NOT PARK INN HANDICAP SPOTSSS
0 likesThat kid will get to watch this video and watch the guy who killed his father lie about what happened
0 likesi do not like this comment. are u implying his father did deserve it?
0 likesWhat's new?
0 likesAnd the father that died?!
0 likesWell maybe people shouldn't be physical when there's no reason to be.
0 likes@G l i c k Yes because being pushed down makes you vulnerable, and when you're put in a vulnerable position in public out of nowhere your going to take the most efficient route to defending yourself which is a gun. What was he going to do after he pushed him down? Leave him alone?
0 likes@Henni Gadient Well he shouldn't have escalated the situation that far when he didn't need to like a bonehead. Nobody deserves to die, but people can be stupid and die from that.
0 likes@Tyler Hite Shame on you just shame on you! yes people are stupid.
0 likes@Henni Gadient So do you think it's fine for anyone who gets into a verbal fight to push the other person to the ground?
0 likes@Tyler Hite He did not appear to be approaching him after he shoved him, even before pulling the gun. Even so, taking the gun out was all that he needed. Shooting was completely unwarented, the guy was clearly triggy happy.
0 likes@Tyler Hite You think its gine to shot back?! thats the question here. shame in you !
0 likes@Tyler Hite He maid 3!!!! steps back and was unarmed!!!!! €&@&€@&€&&€€&
0 likes@Old Ironsides exactly. And not bx of the fucking murderer that shooted him without any reason?! This comment section.... SHAME
0 likes@KillerShark And you know that bc?
0 likes@Sightless Sniper SHAmE on you!
0 likes@Henni Gadient He didn't know that he was unarmed, he was pushed to the ground. So it's okay for you to just randomly shove people to the ground? You must have a lot of friends. You are literally not even reading what I'm saying so I'm honestly done with you. If you can't see the hysteria around George Floyd protests influencing people into states of fear, you need to do some research. People are so uninformed ffs. No wonder Biden won.
0 likes@Henni Gadient also quit being emotional, And start being logical.
0 likes@Tyler Hite that your country lives in the 3-Reich doesnt make it logic.
0 likes@Tyler Hite if laughting about you is emotional😂
0 likes@Travel with Tony yeah no shit, hindsight is 20/20. Doesn’t mean it was deserved, like the other guy was implying
0 likes@Henni Gadient You're a bad dad joke incarnate, Jesus. Make sense sometime please.
0 likes@Tyler Hite You want some cold hard logic? Here you go:
0 likes1. McLaughlin shouldn't have escalated the conflict to a physical level.
2. Drejka shouldn't have fired his gun in light of the fact that McLaughlin was clearly backing away.
3. Floyd was murdered by Chauvin, the act was unequivocally caught on tape and the outrage about it is fully justified. Neither hopeless Chauvin apologetics based on laughably irrelevant circumstances nor fake news outlets denying it altogether won't change that reality.
@Frederik L. Fentanyl Floyd? You completely lost all leverage with me. Try idolizing someone who doesn't put gun barrels to pregnant women's stomachs rips someone off and then plays it off like he's a good guy. Not to mention the criminal record beforehand. Face it, everything you know is a lie. Do research that isn't from front page news if you want the real truth my friend.
0 likes@Tyler Hite
1 likeYou: "everything you know is a lie"
Also you: "I get my info from unverified fake news outlets and I'm proud of it!"
Face it, I never even needed "leverage" with you in the first place, you've decided to live in a fictional alternate universe long ago.
@Frederik L. You know where I get my news? Ok Mr.Stalker. idk about you but I just look at the toxicology report and eyewitness accounts. What do you listen to? CNN? Blm rhetoric that is in no way true?
0 likes@Tyler Hite There you go proving my point. Chauvin literally choked Floyd to death. Claiming Floyd would have survived being literally choked to death if not for previous intoxication is equivalent to claiming that a victim of a fatal shot to the head would have survived if only the round had been fired from a handgun instead of an assault rifle. It's murder no matter how you try to twist and turn it.
0 likesThis is exactly what I'm talking about, marginal circumstances are either fabricated out of thin air or blown out of proportion by fake news outlets like Fox News, Daily Wire, Infowars and all their even cheaper copycats, but all they can ever hope to achieve are very exhausting and completely unconvincing excuses for what every reasonable person can recognize as obvious crimes.
@Frederik L. Did you not read a word I just said, he was already going to die of fentanyl overdose. Not to mention being on 3 other things, dude literally held up his pregnant wife to try to save his skin. Dude was a degenerate.
0 likes@Tyler Hite Oh I am reading every word you say, but all I see is more hysteria and alternative facts as if the scene wasn't actually caught on tape.
0 likesI could ask you the same thing, you know? Cause it seems to me like you're very eager to gloss over the fact that Chauvin commited manslaughter "at best" and outright murder at worst.
@Frederik L. Do you not realize when you are high on multiple drugs your heart is beating incredibly hard. And you will freaking out and be uncooperative af around cops because you don't want to get taken in to a police station high af as Floyd was to Chauvin if you watch the whole video.
0 likes@Tyler Hite Did you not see Floyd begging for his life, clearly unable to breathe, and Chauvin still not moving an inch. Excuses along the lines of "it's not as bad as it looks", "he could easily have survived" or "he was dead anyway" are
0 likesa) inaccurate to begin with,
and
b) irrelevant to the irrefutable crime that was commited by Chauvin.
Why was the lady in the background of the Defense's closing statement circled? What does the yawn mean?!
0 likesReplies (1)
I think it was a look of shock, not a yawn
1 likeThis guy was looking for an excuse to use his pistol.
2103 likesReplies (45)
I think he was looking for an excuse to test his aim.
5 likes@Enoch Powell really? lol
86 likes@Enoch Powell 🤣k
5 likes@Enoch Powell He's serving 20 years. The court determined it wasn't a legitimate reason.
88 likes@Enoch Powell you are the deciding factor about what's right from wrong, hmn?
60 likes@Enoch Powell At the end of the day, both of them were in the wrong. The guy should've never pushed the other guy, and likewise, that guy shouldn't have shot him for getting "pushed".
15 likesHe found a good one then 😎
1 likeAJ Archibald - The court didn’t want another Michael Brown, they just delayed it.
0 likes@Enoch Powell ya im sure we should all turn to people like you to determine the proper sentencing, you know people who failed high school and are now someone legal experts.
15 likes@NevadaR6 you are 100% correct
2 likesIsn't that what all americans boil down to?
1 like@Enoch Powell FYI, I am flagging every comment you make. You cam blame me for you being censored. Racism is unAmerican and we will wash you down the drain of history.
15 likesHere are other incidents involving this piece of trash:
12 likesClaim Drejka pointed a gun and followed them. They take down his license plate number and contact authorities. Drejka claims the driver cut him off and says he honked his horn and yelled at them but denies pointing his gun and following them. The driver and passenger decline to press charges.
Claim Drejka threatened them with a gun. They report the incident to a Largo police officer, who pulls Drejka over. Drejka claims the driver drove too slowly in a 15-mph school zone and says he honked his horn at them but denies pointing his gun. The officer declines to arrest Drejka since the victims drove off.
Claims she was waiting for Drejka to pass while in the center lane waiting to turn. Drejka claims the woman nearly hit him and admits to brake-checking her, causing her to rear-end him. A Florida Highway Patrol trooper accuses Drejka of aggressive driving and cites him for the collision.
Claims Drejka confronted him over parking his employer's tanker truck in the handicapped space. He accuses Drejka of threatening to shoot him and using a racial slur. The store owner Salous intervened and ordered Drejka to stop or else he would call the police, to whom Drejka replied, "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After the incident Drejka calls the company the driver works for and complains to the owner John Tyler, reportedly saying the driver was "lucky I didn't blow his head off." The driver reports this incident to the police in July after the shooting of Markeis McGlockton at the same location.
And that thug was looking for an excuse to use his hands.
1 likeGrow up, don't attack old or crippled people you bigot.
@Shyhalu Don't go up to a women with her child and start acting out.
9 likes@Veloxy Don't park in a crippled person's handicap spot.
1 likeYou lose.
Ra HoWa Bahaha, I wonder if you deleted your comment or it got marked as spam. Regardless, they say “imitation is a form of flattery.”
2 likes@Enoch Powell Holy shit found the crazies up in this YouTube comment section
6 likesYeah those kind of people are particularly violent. He would've done way worse if not for the gun drawn. Cant say I feel bad for the jogger.
0 likes@Enoch Powell Yeah everytime I so much as criticize jogger behaviour my comment is insta removed.
0 likesThese people are factually violent and over aggresive. Why don't people get this. I'm almost positive all these BLM types have never lived in their neighborhoods before, never forced to go to school with them. They're not human in my opinion. And anyone who puts one down should be awarded for public service.
0 likes@Enoch Powell - welp just lost a paragraph.
0 likes@Enoch Powell if you have instragram add @jogslayer what they fear the most is white unity. Growing a community of like minded individuals is crucial.
0 likesRa HoWa getting pushed to the ground is not a reason to kill someone 🤯
4 likes@AJ Archibald The court determined the victim was black, and thus the white man was automatically guilty.
3 likesNo Fux ah that’s racist 😬 he wasn’t “jumping” anyone, he shoved someone on the ground 😬 no further action. Calling someone a thug to demonize someone, yikes
9 likesRa HoWa the first amendment protects you from the government ya simpleton. Google is a private company and they can censor whoever they want without disrupting anyone's first amendment rights.
9 likesFocused Bear how?
0 likes@Enoch Powell "In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
6 likes1) George Orwell never said or wrote this.
2) NiNeTeEn-EiGhTy-FoUr reeeeeeeeee
3) Why would you quote someone who, even if he had written that, so vehemently opposes you and everything you stand for?
@Enoch Powell Jesus was black
6 likes@Enoch Powell You obviously haven't read any of his work if you have to ask that. His writing is some of the most anti-conservative writing of his time.
8 likesBesides which, Orwell is misattributed those words, from a book published in 1982 -- 30 years after his death. He never said or wrote anything of the sort in his lifetime. Nobody knows who said that, but the fact that I guessed -- without Googling -- that you were implicitly referencing 1984 & alluding to Orwellianism, should speak volumes as to the veracity of anything you have to say... specifically the lack thereof.
I mean the black guy was unecassarily aggressive, but it still wasn't completely okay.
0 likesEnratic he fired one round. Hardly the action of someone wanting to “use” their pistol when he could have emptied the mag.
0 likeshe was trigger happy
2 likesJust like World War 1 countries looking for a excuse
0 likes@Ra HoWa pls tell to us what ReHoWa means, it will explain a lot about your mind & ideology 🤣😂😭
3 likesDaniel Morris I’ve reported you to my local ZOG chapter. Your name is in the system. Good luck.
1 like@Enoch Powell no. The minute he pulled out his gun he neutralized any perceived threat. Not only was this asshole wrong, he was behaving in a threatening way toward a female!
3 likesI think so, too.. considering the 4 past incidents invoving him with his gun (without firing it). Now this time, he seemed to have the chance to fire it.
1 likeEnoch Powell there is nothing revolutionary about shooting an unarmed father for 3 kids right in front of his kids lol.
1 likeFor sure
0 likes@Enoch Powell the guy also parked illegaly next to her. He shot someone because he was pushed. He was no in any imediate danger. He was looking for trouble. He confronts people infront of stores for a disabled parking spot when he didnt need it. He instigisted the confrontation. He paused and thought before pulling the trigger while the man was backing away.
0 likes@Enoch Powell Sounds like somebody is filtering a lot of information through some prejudices
0 likes@Enoch Powell His reason was NOT justified.
0 likes@ exactly what I was thinking throughout this whole video
0 likesProsecutor was pretty good here. Shat the bed for Curtis Reeves though.
0 likesThis guy wasn't going out looking for someone to murder, but he WAS living the gun owner's dream. This is exactly why these people want guns, and exactly the excuse they want to use them. "They came at me" is all the justification they need to end a life and prove what a dominant alpha they are. Don't give this guy a gun and this situation wouldn't have escalated past him being on the floor. Hell, he would be the victim of assault. But as soon as you give someone the "easy option", they will take it, and they will flaunt it, and society crumbles.
8 likesInvestigator: " were you in the military? "
886 likesDude: " Yes sir, Mall Cop training, a whole 30 minutes"
Replies (2)
Wow! This is where they got the "Mall Cop." movie idea from...😐
3 likes@Adam Ferguson bro it was a joke
0 likesSomeone died defending his family from a wacko who thought life was gta. I’m glad justice was served in he end, i hope the victim’s family eventually recovers.
555 likesReplies (17)
I wouldn't say the guy "defended his family" he definitely assaulted the guy for no reason. The subject of this video was undoubtedly guilty of murder and was wrong for even drawing his weapon, but if he hadn't the father would have recieved assault charges, and for good reason.
43 likes@patrick kinnear I'm not American, but where I'm from what the father did wouldn't even count as a proper crime, it would be a tort. If the same thing happened here and Michael hadn't acted like a complete psycho, he could have probably sued, but the father wouldn't have gotten prison time, just would have had to pay some money.
24 likeshonestly the whole situation is insane and nobody is in the right imo
51 likes1. family parks in disabled spot
2. weirdo who thinks his life revolves around defending his local gas station confronts the mother
3. argument ensues instead of the mother avoiding confrontation by something as simple as "sorry, I will move the car"
4. father comes out and his first reaction to a verbal argument is to get physical
5. weirdo finally gets to shoot his gun after waiting for so long to use it
Moral of the story: don't hook up with a classless girl who is going to drag you down with her!
1 like@Squiggly Line 1. No Don't be a pos
17 likes2. If someone is idling in a parking spot leave them alone
3. Ignore the wannabe cop they have no authority and they want attention
4. There's no reason to fight anyway. Don't push anyone Don't shoot anyone and everyone gets home safe
@Manuel Olivas That random father was evil because he wanted to defend his partner and the mother of his kids?
10 likes@Manuel Olivas You are literally worse than Michael
3 likes@Ireneusz Swierczynski His life wasn't ever in danger
1 likeJustice was not served. he only got 20 years and will be released with good behavior in 10
1 like@E H-I amen to that
0 likesDefending his family by running back in the store when he got shot with the woman and her kids in the car?
0 likes@Mark Muir he got shot in the chest and then ran into the store for help where he collapsed and died… white fit was scared that a black guy was going to beat him up that’s all it was and pulled out his gun … he needed that hun cuhz he never won a fist fight a day in his life
7 likes@Mememaster 69 where i live his actions wouldn’t count as a crime either.
1 likeIt's as esy as to buy guns in ur Country compared to gta. That's so unreal I can't imagine. Here in Germany we don't sell guns to any idiots who don't live in reality. And guess what, spoiler alert we don't have shootings here by us. (compared to America)
0 likes@John Doe defending them from a verbal confrontation by sprinting at and pushing a guy over? That was not „defending“. Not saying that the shooter was right though
0 likesJustice was served
0 likesIt was only because he's black. This is a wrongful conviction. I would've done more than he did
0 likesHonestly the part that ticked me off was that after he had a month to think about it, he said he wouldn’t have done anything differently. I can understand making an irrational split second decision, but there truly was no need to fire, & the man he killed had a wife and kids. He should’ve regretted what he’d done at the very least
422 likesReplies (22)
Yeah..
2 likesHe showed ZERO emotional connection or reaction to the sudden tragedy. NONE. NONE.
36 likesthe only time he shows any regret or remorse is when the interviewer asks him about his dogs. not the fact that he took a husband and a father away from their family over a stupid parking space.
8 likes@christian No one should get killed over a parking space BUT let's put this in perspective:
1 likeThe guy wasn't shot and killed over a parking space, he was shot and killed because he turned a verbal altercation into a physical one.
Let's also not forget:
He wouldn't have been killed if his wife had respected the parking laws
He wouldn't have been killed if his wife had said "sorry, I didn't realize it was a handicapped spot" and moved her vehicle
He wouldn't have been killed if he didn't go hands on to Drejka
Yes, Drejka should have pulled his weapon and backed the guy off, NOT fired, but don't dismiss all the events leading up to that.
It wasn’t his Wife. They were not married. Most likely being on Welfare and Food Stamps is why they weren’t married. They didn’t have the same last name.
0 likesTotally agreed!!
0 likes@Muskoka Mike ok MikeCORRECT, if we were in a perfect world and everyone made the right choices!!! However, in the scheme of living life this shouldn’t have happened over a parking space!!!
3 likes@Nikia White See, these situations give fuel to the anti gun nuts saying "see this is what happens when you allow someone to arm themselves".
1 likeBTW: this didn't happen over a parking space, this happened because the man turned a verbal altercation into a physical one.
I wouldn't even say "in a perfect world", I'd say even in the most basic civilized world. There's a theory called "the shopping cart theory" and the basis is "if you were raised right, you return the shopping cart to the corral" and they continue from that extrapolating on how "civilized" a society is.
The kicker is: there are actually people who argue that they are RIGHT in not returning the shopping cart.
Now using that in this scenario: the woman shouldn't have parked in the handicapped spot. When she was called out for it, she should have said "sorry, ok, I'll move" but in today's UNcivilized society, women are taught to be "bad bitc&es" and of COURSE she wouldn't react properly and admit her error, HOW DARE A SOMEONE CALL HER OUT? "oh no you dinnit"!!!
@christian Micheal Dunn the other shooter at a convenience store killing a teen cried on the stand when they mentioned his DOG. I love dogs with all my heart but it didn't make him look empathetic he looked like a selfish jerk not one tear over the teen he murdered.
5 likes@Poker Joker Wow! that's hateful. I'm calling you out for your racist comment. Be better.
8 likes@Muskoka Mike no the preceding events aren't brought up because doing so lays equal blame on the victim when thats just not the case.
4 likesThe murder instigated the conflict by turning a minor event of someone parking illegally into screaming for several minutes. Lets also not forgot all his actions leading upto the event.
He was stepping outside of his authority social obligation, and had had this kind of conflict several times before. Even after being told to stop by the owners of the gas station. This shows a patern of agressive behavior reinforced by the 4 other times he pulled a gun on others in that month alone.
The extent of the victims blame is a minor infraction and the single battery of pushing the man. The extent of the murders blame is a history of starting arguments over something that is not his business, and he was prohibited from doing. Having a history of agressive action culminating in reacting to being pushed by pulling a gun, and shooting a retreating man after having seconds to see he was no longer in danger.
Nothing but him is the reason why people are anti gun. People like him get guns and look for a reason to use them. In this case policing something not in his right, escalating every argument caused by his behavior, and shooting someone not on rushed reaction but because he wanted to. That murder deserved everything he got and is getting.
@Muskoka Mike your second comment about the shopping cart theory is almost irrelevant as it just adresses a form of social contract. In no way does it justify stepping outside of a reasonable social escalation, and breaking the social contract yourself by screaming at someone. Nor does it justify you shooting someone if they push you to get you away from them for screaming at them about the cart.
2 likes@Shadow nice rant, but who said it did? (justify shooting someone for not returning the cart).
0 likesHere's how escalation works:
Person A doesn't return their cart
Person B says Hey return that cart (rightfully)
Person A says F you
Person B says OH yeah? (rightfully)
Person A pushes person B
Person B defends himself (rightfully)
The whole situation could have been avoided if Person A was raised correctly. If Person A was taught from an early age, when you get called out for your misdeeds, there's punishment, they would learn. Instead? They react with aggression "don't tell me what to do". Hence why the prison population is so large in the US.
@Shadow Nice rant, but you skipped and minimized the "minor event" which was the catalyst.
0 likesShould she have parked in the handicapped spot? NOPE.
Should she move the second someone called her out on it? YUP.
But as my previous response: she wasn't taught right from wrong and instead of admitting her mistake and correcting it, she went ballistic.
@Muskoka Mike ah yes thats escilation with a normal person. This was more like
2 likesPerson A: Doesn't return cart
Person B: Tells them to put the cart back, or overblows the situation and is rude in their suggestion
Person A: (rightfully,) Indignant at person Bs rudeness"f off."
Person B: indignant (debatable,) begins yelling at person A and acting in an aggressive manner
Person A: pushes person B
In order for your idea to make sense person B has to have been raised well themselves and engage withing the confines of social contract. Thus in step 4 they cannot break the social contract. He could have done this by threats of legal punishment, insults of his own, etc. He instead yelled and acted aggressively, he as person B cannot do so he has to keep within social convention.
If not then Person B has no moral ground to stand on, as they are committing the same action of violating the social contract and decency. The murderer did not act within the social contract. He stepped beyond this responsibilities, and ignored direction from those with the authority he did not. He was raised just as if not more poorly to escalate the situation further then normal, and kill someone over something that was not his place and was actively made not his place.
He had no right to do any more then the social contract allows. This line of logic stopped applying to this situation as soon as he started yelling. In the absence of physical altercation the theories logical end point is to step away and call those who can rightfully handle the situation. Whether that may be a manager who can ban person A or the police who can punish the person ignoring the parking laws.
This of course does not bring in the other evidence of ill rearing. Those being escalating conflict by threatening death at inappropriate times on at least 4 other occasions.
@Muskoka Mike It should also be noted that Michael himself was parked illegally. If Person A doesn't return their cart and Person B tells them to return it (while also not returning their own cart). Person A now has every right to be indignant. Person B, however, does not have the right to escalate the situation by being aggressive and yelling when they themselves are being hypocritical. While Person C should not have pushed Person B, they did it to protect Person A. Person B should not have shot Person C in response to a push and assumed they would continue the altercation.
1 likeAll in all, a man died over a woman parking in a handicapped spot. Maybe she shouldn't have parked there, but it was not her fault that her boyfriend decided to push Michael, and it certainly wasn't her fault Michael shot her boyfriend. Michael could have reported her instead of getting involved directly, especially since it didn't directly affect him.
Well his irrational split second decision had dire consequences.
0 likes@christian Exactly!!
0 likes@Muskoka Mike Anti-gun nuts? As opposed to the sensible gun enthusiasts?
1 like@crypt The scary part? Here in Canada the politicians making the rules don't even know this. They recently banned "AR assault rifles" FFS.
0 likesYOU LUNATICS.....how about you learn what the hell you're talking about before talking about it.
@Muskoka Mike literally not the point. We aren't discussing of the confrontation was justified, or if he shouldve parked in the parking space in the first place, or the fact that the gun was even justifiably pulled out. You can argue all those things but that's not what this case is trying to prove at all. It was asking whether or not the use of deadly force was justified. Maybe if the man who was shot was still alive, all of these things would have been discussed, but the fact that he died? It voids all of it.
0 likes@Muskoka Mike OK but hear me out, our person B here fucking murdered person A. Sure, none of this would have happened if person B never did something wrong, but person B also wasn't aware of the whole situation. Person B just saw someone berating his wife and children, and (in my opinion rightfully) shoved him off. Had person B known the full story, maybe it would have turned out a bit differently, after all, it's not as if person B was aware the his wife was being rude to person A, and most likely did not know that he parked in a handicap spot. A little push ain't going to kill anyone, and person B was already backing up after the fact, untill person A turned the situation from a relatively small altercation about a parking spot, to a full blown man slaughter case. There was no reason for person A to believe that he was even gonna be hurt at that point, maybe if he tried to explain himself to the man and why he was upset, things would have went smoothly. But no, he just took his gun out and shot a man who was already backing up in the first place. And you say that person B escalated? Person A both instigated the altercation, and escalated it to heights I don't think person B really thought it was ever gonna go.
0 likesThat was a roller coaster to watch, thank christ this guy got what he deserved !!
118 likesWatching that defence attorney was like watching a child attempt to convince a bunch of other children that someone didn't steal all the cookies from the cookie jar.... if I were part of the jury involved in this case I would feel as though he was insulting my intelligence with the way he speaks, did he really believe those arguments stood any fucking chance?
Replies (4)
Same. I’m just sitting here like how can the defense attorney actually take himself seriously by trying to defend Michael. I mean it’s clear as day that Michael didn’t care about shooting someone because it’s clear that the guy he shot was walking away and therefore clearly not a threat. A normal person’s reaction to getting shoved like he did would have been to say like what the hell or whatnot not to grab a gun and shoot the person.
3 likesHe probably didn’t think any of it would work. Someone has to take these dumb cases in order for them to stand trial. An attorney is required to give their best to a case or else they face losing their ability to practice. Seeing how incriminating the case was, I can see why his best was so awful.
20 likesWell even in a lost case you have to say SOMETHING as a defense lawyer if you want to write a bill, even if it's just some mumbo-jumbo word salad.
2 likesI am always astonished at how defense attorneys justify defending murderers with lies and trickery. I couldn't sleep at night.
0 likesThank god for video cameras. It makes me sick to think of all the horrible injustices that have occurred in the past due to there not being video evidence to expose the lies of people like drejka.
16 likesSomeone died all because this guy was mad about a parking spot and got a boo-boo on his elbow. His head is warped. I can only imagine how the family of the victim must feel. That has to be one of the hardest things to see. :(
108 likesReplies (3)
Can't imagine anything much worse. Just watch out for the defenders of this guy, they like to stalk the comment section spilling their nonsense of why the dead guy had it coming.
13 likesFor me, I would rather get beat up and live than not get beat up but kill a father in front of his child.
@Gifted Fox it's because he's black, I'm just saying it
7 likesRevise the races nobody would be trying to justify it
@vocal procrastinating 100% this. people can try to tell us that it wasn’t, but it is. And im willing to bet, that if it was a white woman who had parked in the handicapped spot, he would’ve either just ignore her or kindly ask her to move from the parking spot.
1 likeThat prosecutor nailed it. I am glad justice was served!
25 likesReplies (1)
Yeah he did a great job but unfortunately the guy isn’t serving life
2 likesI saw this in a CCW class once. The instructor asked the class if he/she would rule this as justified. The instructor left the answer open ended in order to encourage discussion. But ultimately, the instructor said that regardless of the verdict, the shooter's behavior leading up to the shooting was unacceptable. The shooter was way too aggressive, irascible, and unobservant (he just let the other guy blindside him with the shove). I wouldn't rule this as a justified shooting, but then again, I'm not a jury of 12 people from a different state.
5 likesI carry too, but you have to understand what an imminent threat is. I understand he's annoyed that someone who isn't handicapped is taking up the space. That said, there weren't any other cars, that I could see, and the man was in and out quickly. He had an aggressive reaction over a relatively minor issue. Being pushed is not an immediate threat of serious injury or death. I've been trained with firearms since I was a kid, I'm 46 now. Thankfully I've never had to pull my weapon. In my opinion this guy wasn't properly trained. Don't carry if you have anger issues. He didn't need to draw. Usually if someone sees your weapon they will walk away. This is a speculative opinion, but I think this guy was looking for a fight. If the victim had begun kicking, beating, or stomping him, this would be an entirely different situation. Unfortunately, he's an angry person, with a lower than average intelligence. His goal was to become police or military, but couldn't hack it. He tries, and fails, to use military and police terms. It's pathetic. and he took it out on someone defending his wife. The shooter knows he made a mistake, that had deadly consequences. He immediately begins to spin a narrative, giving too much irrelevant information. His body language, sentence structure, pronouns, and he's being overly polite are all indications of deception. He killed the victim in cold blood. The detectives are on him from the jump.
21 likesReplies (4)
Being pushed could absolutely lead to death if the person lands on their head wrong. There was literally a case of a landlord who died this exact way when his tenant pushed him, happened this past week I believe. Drejka was found guilty due to his comments he made to the police and because he shot the victim that was clearly stopping his attack and backing away when he saw the gun. If the guy had continued to try and assault Drejka, the sentencing outcome could have been very different. But if you go around pushing people while YOU'RE the aggressor, they have every right to self defense.
0 likesYeah the issue is that NO ONE has to be trained correctly to have the weapon. So people like him are all over just waiting for a chance to use their courage enhancer
4 likes@Kira Yea, Ok lol
2 likes@Kira the case you’re talking about is not comparable because that man was pushed off the edge of a staircase, hit his head and died. Drejka was on level ground and the worst “injury” he could claim from that altercation was a little boo boo on his arm.
0 likesHave several seats and be quiet.
The way he acted about his little injury was so funny, I mean come on! insisting on greeting with his left hand, buttoning up the shirt into a sling... and then he completely forgot whenever he was asked to act out what happened.
31 likesIf he was a better actor I bet he would be the type of guy who got himself in accidents and then sued for made up injuries
Replies (1)
Yeah it was funny when all of a sudden his shirts in a damn sling lol he acted like he got tackled the dude literally just gave him a good push he wasn’t running at any point lol dudes a wimpy clown
5 likes"The defendant is guilty because he is a good shot" might be the dumbest legal argument I've ever heard (not commenting on the overall justifiability or verdict in this case).
8 likesIt's a sick society when you think the right reaction to being shoved is to pull your gun and shoot. 🤦♂️
6 likesReplies (1)
Had he not pull the gun, he'd get his head stomped in the next second for sure. Judging by the moral character of the dead guy who escalates, at that point, a purely verbal confrontation to physical. His mistake was panicking and firing, since from the cctv footage it seems like the dead guy reacted wisely at having a piece pointed at him and maybe was even about to retreat.
0 likesI love how the cops were playing dumb on everything I love how they stayed they didn’t know what a force multiplayer was you know damn well they did also you know damn well if a cop got shoved like that they would of fired too that’s what pisses me off about this whole situation and the fact that If he would of said he feared for his life he probably wouldn’t be in prison. The guy just got shoved to the ground violently and they expect him to know exact distances and time elapsed between him pulling the gun and firing in high stress situation no body counts that it’s not like he’s at the range with his beeper lol . He definitely should of said he wanted a lawyer before he said anything even if it pisses them off or makes you look guilty cops can be very dirty and lie in there interrogations always always ask for a lawyer
3 likesReplies (1)
Usually when a cop gets shoved or pushed or whatever, they are dealing with a criminal.
0 likesBut no matter how he reacted, there were no words interchanged between the two men. Plus, he never charged him. The guy took three steps back once he saw the gun. In a situation like that, three seconds is an eternity. Watching the video, that gun followed that man.
Just that alone is enough.
The funny thing is that had he not shot the guy he could’ve easily gotten him fined, even though the other guy didn’t start the fight.
3 likesThis guy just really thinks he was in the right, huh? Honestly, that’s what I think is the difference between someone like this guy and someone like Michael Dunn. Michael started the fight with the intent to shoot someone, the fact that he followed them and kept shooting and then his fleeing the scene shows that. He knew he was in the wrong, but he did it anyway. This guy thought he was fully in the right, he frames it like he was nobly correcting an injustice, I don’t even think he meant to kill the guy with his 1 shot. But that’s what makes it worse, I don’t think he feels bad or even recognizes that he did a bad thing. He just coldly brushed past it, and doesn’t care that someone died. He feels entirely justified and that someone died from his actions is just a side effect. It’s so gross thinking about it. It’s almost worse than the alternative to me.
0 likesI like how the investigators even ask politely.. Like can I call you Michael? Here in India if they knew who the culprit was he would have been trashed black and blue without even flinching for a second. I've seen so many cases on here. They really take it slow to gather all the possible evidences. They listen to their side while they already have their own proofs and know everything about it. In India it's over even before it starts.
1 likeIf you carry you should actively avoid confrontation not look for an excuse to be involved in one.
8 likesDefense Lawyer: "He's not happy. He's not celebrating."
21 likesOh, thank God he's not clicking his heels together and popping champagne bottles. He has 0.00000008% of humanity in him.
Replies (1)
I bet the only reason he wasn’t looking visibly happy was bc he thought he had to put up a serious+sad persona for court
0 likesThank god they found him guilty. I was worried that jury would acquit him. Phew
3 likesThe fact that the defense lawyer said that drejka was the real victim when someone literally died….
1 likeHe’s not pretty much a normal average everyday guy. He’s a coward nothing more.
6 likes"He gave me no reason to shoot him but I had a gun on me so why not?" - Michael
21 likesTalk about a plethora of bad decisions. You have an entire parking lot of empty spaces yet you choose to park in the one space designated for handicap/van accessible patrons. Barney Fife pulls up with a hard-on for parking violations, and probably minorities, and starts a confrontation. Alpha male comes out of the store and without have any info at all he shoves Barney Fife to the ground forcibly. Barney pulls a weapon and fires against Alpha Male who probably regretted escalating the confrontation physically once he saw the gun and decides to slowly backpedal like he’s confronted a bear. Fife, sensing he is losing his chance to shoot an unarmed black man, let’s lose a shot. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything as senseless as this.
1 likeIf you can’t use your hands or know how to avoid / diffuse a confrontation, and carry a weapon for self defense you should get some situational awareness and social skills under your belt.
3 likesThumbs up for that prosecutor, great job.
3 likesit's crazy how quick he went for the gun, at no point did the victim show he had any weapon he just pushed him to the ground, it could of just been a fist fight but no he went straight for the kill, that to me is 1st degree murder, he had multiple options instead of pulling the trigger, he could of let it go and went about his day, he could of started a fight or called the police to report assault but nope he went with kill first ask questions later
0 likesSomething I literally just thought of because of this case. How effective do you think it would be to require a verbal "gun owner's oath" upon receiving a concealed carry permit? Or, perhaps, upon the purchase of any firearm? Verbal self affirmations are an effective tool for overcoming trauma, achieving goals, affecting your mood, and much more. You're much more likely to perform a task better if you say outloud to yourself "okay, I got this...". What if we required gun owner's to verbally speak a well-written and easily understandable oath? I'm no wordsmith, but something like:
9 likes"This firearm is not a reason to start fights. It is not a tool for winning arguments. It is a responsibility. It is a last resort. I swear to do my best to avoid confrontations and de-escalate situations before considering drawing a firearm."
Do I sound like an absolute fool for thinking this oath might've helped avoid this situation? I mean, you're a gunowner now, you took an oath. You're going to think of that when a confrontation arises. You're going to think of it when you notice you're mouthing off, and probably start to de-escalate. Idk, anyone have thoughts?
Replies (2)
Great idea - and they should verbalize it every time they strap their gun on.
0 likesI don't think it will really help much ( I am 90% sure I am wrong so any gun owners out there feel free to correct me) since to me gun owners are one of 2 types. You got responsible gun owners, who resort to using guns as a last effort to save yourself and then you have nut-jobs like ol' Mike did there. So you got people who don't need to take an oath since they are already responsible and you got people who would probably just say the oath and forget it the next day. But it's still possible introducing some kind of oath could help with these cases even if just a little bit. Just my thoughts.
1 likeDude thinks he's a cop, describing the craziest on-duty story of his career. he seems so proud when telling his story
0 likesIt took a life to get this maniac that thought was an authority off the streets. He liked getting into confrontations and it got one killed and him in jail for life. How dumb can someone be.
2 likesReplies (1)
Wanna know the worst part. This guy would have been a self described "responsible gun owner" before this incident. I wonder how many more "responsible gun owners" there are out there that are just like this guy. Living their lives every day hoping for the day they get to use their gun.
0 likesI have a question for any people watching this in the US...... is the threat of violence so bad that people just carry guns in their car? Driving seems to be a situation where easy access to a weapon may be asking for trouble. (Road rage is a problem in UK, I can only imagine what would happen if some of the muppets here had access to firearms) I apologise in advance for my ignorance 🙃
0 likesReplies (1)
It depends on where you live. There are cities in the US that have big problems with crime, gang violence or poverty (to name a few factors) that contributes to high homicide rates compared to the rest of the country, and people living in those cities might opt to carry a firearm as a means of self defense.
0 likesIn other places, people might still carry because even though homicides are lower where they live, they'd still rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it just in case. Some might say that speaks to paranoia on their part, but I personally don't see it that way for the majority of gun owners. There's also the belief that if more people are armed (and responsible with the use of their guns) then would-be criminals would think twice about committing crimes because they don't want to find themselves in a situation where they don't know who's armed and who isn't.
I mean, if you wanna defend yourself, you kind of should think of shooting the leg or arm, as that is the least likely hood of killing someone, I have often thought that people think after they have shot, so they generally have no idea what they have done before they have done it....
0 likesSpeaking of, I can see how it is a difficult scenario, you are under distress and you act by instinct, so... with that in mind, anything could really happen, this person could've accidentally gone with a headshot as well, you never really know
he knew EXACTLY what he was doing. This man is the definition of a self righteous asshole. That man did not diserve to die. he wanted to protect his children. It infuriates me this man didn’t get life
0 likesAubrey’s killer admitted he never heard him say a word. He was still chased down, defenseless, and murdered. Marquis came out of a store to defend the mother of his children from a self righteous lunatic. He too never said an utterance, was defenseless and slain. Both deaths hold the same thought process and energy. Fear and delusion is what was standing behind those triggers. One was coming the other was going. This dunce even admitted he never has been in a fight. Yet, he’s willing to assert that he has a full fledge understanding of how this escalated situation should have worked. He’s where he needs to be so he can think about all the times he wanted to be in charge because he had no real power in his weak small little world.
2 likesReplies (1)
I don't really feel these two cases are that similar... Arbery did nothing wrong aside from trespassing, and even then he did nothing but look around and leave without causing any damage. The guy in this video pushed someone from behind and won a Darwin Award, both men in this case were in the wrong in my opinion.
2 likesThis dude just looks like he was bullied all his life. Probably couldn't wait to get into an altercation with his "force multiplier"
1 likeToday. I have learned I will NEVER become a lawyer. I would say “yes, he is guilty. He thinks because he has a gun he can confront people no matter what”. I would loss my job so fast.
80 likesReplies (6)
You mean defense attorney. A prosecutor would be doing their job correctly for doing that.
9 likesBecome a prosecuted
3 likes@Hyper Stormy being prosecuted isn't very fun either
8 likes@nep disc i think he meant a prosecutor
2 likes@nep disc lmao w reply
0 likesIn Portugal Theres no prosecuters
0 likesIn the footage you can see a guy in the blue/purple shirt standing in front of the store, where he immediately got away when Michael pulled out his firearm. Good quick thinking!
0 likesAlternate title: man not minding his own business starts a conflict he chooses to end with a deadly weapon
3 likesDrejka is the kind of guy that recites his Miranda rights every night before he goes to bed.
6 likesReplies (1)
Lol
1 likeThe fact that he feels no remorse for his actions speaks volumes! He's a pos.
0 likes"Mr Drejka was a victim here" - I couldn't have laughed harder at that sorry ass defence lmao
1 likeMaybe he thinks it’s the Wild West and it’s his job to protect disabled parking spaces.
1 likeThere’s an old saying I think it’s biblical .It’s better to grab hold of a vicious dog by the ears than to get involved in an argument that doesn’t concern you..
He’s ended up doing twenty years and got battered in prison for sticking his nose in ,as well as causing a terrible loss to a loving family ..
He feigns the arm injury as soon as the detectives enter the room. Then forgets all about it 10 minutes into the interview.
0 likesthis "man" could harass a female by herself for a minor traffic violation, but could not take a beat down once he's approached. Weak-minded individual.
1 likeLeaves home armed with a lethal weapon, provokes violence by threatening unarmed mother, gets pushed over a little bit, fires to kill on a person retreating. "Manslaughter"
1 like16:30
0 likesPolice: "Was the car running?"
Drejka: "I couldn't tell, maybe? It's so quiet. These damn cars, doesn't sound anything like mine."
God, as if I needed another reason to hate this guy; on top of being an entitled murderous racist, he's also one of those shitheads that feels emasculated unless he drives a loud car.
had a feeling that if he hadn't come out of the store, the wife would've been killed.
1 likedefense lawyer gave me super creepy vibes, he sounds so slimy whereas the prosecution lawyer was awesome! so glad this guy went to jail what an asshole.
0 likesFrom my point of view, and I am not taking sides here, All could have been avoided with just a few words and some "hands up"
0 likesFor a while I thought that his lawyer was going to break down and cry---for the sympathy vote for the killer...
0 likesThis guy is delusional. Seems to say exactly the wrong thing always
1 likeSolution: US gun laws need to be changed asap.
2 likesThis guy literally blew any possible defendse for him😭😭
0 likeshis interview was actually infuriating to listen to.
0 likesI live in Florida. I've been around guys like this my entire life. I guarantee you he's a Republican who voted for Donald Trump.
0 likesThat first lawyer has the most punchabe condescending tone Ive ever heard.
2 likesYou know, you don't have to implicate yourself. Better yet don't do the crime. Second best thing; i want an attorney. Sit in county jail until you are free, i mean if you didn't do it.
0 likesThat's not your burden of proof to prove.
These are almost cringeworthy to me lol
So glad we have different gun rules in germany
2 likesLesson learned from this case, mind your business and don't get killed for any female.
0 likes16:33
0 likesDetective: was the car running
This guy: maybe it was so quiet… these damn cars
Detective: oh well its the car’s fault youre free to go
idk why he still allowed to carry a gun despite the previous incidents reported.
2 likes20 yrs and the victim’s family got a life sentence, just not fair!! He died in front of his son!
0 likesSad he misses his dogs... but dont worry about the victims wife and children
2 likesit’s a good thing none of the people in the comments are lawyers, judges, or apart of the jury
0 likesMicheal did make 2 steps towards Drejka after pushing him, implying he's not done yet. He did not try to warn Drejka about the use of force but cheapshotted him basically. Up to that point, there is 0 awareness of any threat or premeditation, as Drejka will only then for the 1st time see his attacker after Micheal is already making those 2 steps forward.
4 likesThe outcome of this case should have set an example in public that no form of aggression
Is allowed.
Did Drejka have to shoot, no!
Could he have shot in the air.. yes, i think it would have desired effect.
Was he surprised and scared, no doubt.
In my eyes, he's guilty for taking mans life, and him carrying a gun around well thats america.. him playing a role of some local protector warning about wrong parking could be easily seen as a positive thing in different circumstances.
Drejka was attacked from behind and Michael kept walking towards him.
You've heard many times, do not pull a gun if you have no intent to shoot. From the moment he went for the gun to shooting it took 2.5 sec, are those 2.5 sec enough for anyone to change thier mind in situation like this... im not so convinced.
I'd shoot in the air.. i think... its hard to imagine as im not carrying a gun walking the streets of america.
It's almost like the sheriffs were leading him to give the "right" answers after he confirms over and over that it didn't go how they are suggesting. Not a great interview imo
1 likeDid drejka know that the shooting was actually recorded? Because his attempt to justify his actions based on the claim that Markeis was 'taking steps towards him' after he drew his gun is blatantly false, and he would surely have known that you would think?
0 likesThank god for video cameras, because if this event was not recorded, drejka would still be out there with his beloved gun looking to start more confrontations.
This is what happens when possession of a pistol lull's one into a false sense security.
0 likes10:03 "then as I draw my weapon he makes his step towards me" lol he literally backed up then like 5 seconds he then shoots.
0 likesThe guy actually steps away from him when he fired at him.
0 likesThose handshakes were the most awkward things I have ever witnessed.
0 likesIts a multiplier situation by going to jail (shanks everywhere) 🤷♂️
0 likesIt’s so sad because something as petty as this could have never happened if so many things didn’t go wrong. It’s a butterfly effect that could’ve been solved at any point. The lady could’ve apologized for her wrongdoing and moved the car, fixed. The shooter could have not started arguing, fixed. The husband could have not pushed him down immediately, fixed. This doesn’t justify anything the shooter did, but it just seems crazy to me that something this insignificant led to something like this.
3 likesHow flexible his arm suddenly is when he reenacts the scene
1 likeMind ya business, old man. IMO he had no damn business telling that young lady whatever he told her now a young black man is gone because this old man stuck his nose in someone's shit...lose/lose
1 likeAlways lawyer up even if you are only an eye witness!!!!!!
0 likesMaybe when he gets out he will mind his on business and quit trying to police people. That's what the police get paid to do don't confront call the police
0 likesmost of the problems in the USA comes from letting normal people have deadly guns,
2 likesif guns were illegal or just harder to get they could have prevented useless loss of life
Replies (1)
Without a doubt.
0 likesyou can tell he loves retelling his stupid story like he’s proud to have killed a father
0 likesnever talk to the police, only with a lawyer present even if you are innocent
1 likeReplies (1)
I agree! Everything you say will be used against you, so I believe you should always ask for an attorney.
0 likesFight or flight makes people stupid. It is multiplicative with people who are already stupid. These people can carry firearms.
0 likesNot saying that concealed carry is inherently bad or anything. My brother's one of the most level headed people I know and he conceal carries. but in this case, with someone this stupid, he had no business carrying a gun.
When asked by the press about is he racist, Micheals response was “there’s almost no way….”. Maaaad
1 likeThis was a reasonable reaction
1 likedoes everyone jus drive/walk around with a gun in their pocket in america? its madness!!!
1 likeThis Happened Just Miles from my Home I remember The Breaking News the day It happened.
0 likesI’ve haven’t heard illegal parking get that violent
0 likesUgh he's so sickening. He wants to be a police officer so bad. You can tell he's the type that says "I couldn't be in the military because if the drill Sargeant got in my face, I'd beat the shit out of them".
0 likesDreijka: I need a force multiplier
0 likesCop:huh?...oh...you mean a courage multiplier
I wish he only knew just how to mind his own business.
0 likes3 things here .. 1 they did park in a handicap spot for no reason ... 2 he was trying to play cop and decides to confront her ... 3 he panics because he is a bitch and pulls his weapon ... dude BACKS AWAY and he still fires ..... that is murder
0 likesBest question, " would you approach these people without a gun".
0 likes50:00 i wonder what he was writing down at this moment? probably something like "oh shit im fucked"
1 likeHe didn't want to take the chance of fighting back & possibly losing so he chose to shoot him instead. #coward
0 likeshe's like "it was his fault that he got shot"
0 likesWhat kind of a defense is "He wasn't happy to learn that he was now a murderer"?!?!
0 likesHe should of gotten more time based on The other 4 times he did this. What a skum bag. 40yrs when I gets out he’ll be in his 80’s. I guess 🙄
0 likesPlease do a video on Jacob Stockdale
0 likesThis is why you never talk to the police without your attorney present.
0 likesIf you have a lawyer with a mohawk youre going to prison
0 likesI live in NC and there are too many of these fucking guys around, and they love talking about "what they'd do." Not a little. A lot.
0 likes"quicker than a flash" I hit the like button.
0 likesI live in Belgium, here it takes 5to10min for an ambulance to get to a scene. I understand usa is a big country. But 90min? I don´t understand this. How can it take that long? Is that normal for america?
0 likesTypical example of a guy looking 4 trouble ...hiding behind his gun
0 likesHe should have got life if u ask me
He a little confused but he got the spirit
0 likes“Does it affect you directly?”
1 like“Well if my mother-in-law pulled in, then yes it would”
That’s a no then bud
people need to mind their own business
2 likes“Madness and Sadness” how very fitting
0 likesThis dude is the real deal. seal team 7/11 👌
0 likesDude’s name was McGlockton and got killed by a Glock. Life’s little circles ☺️
1 likeReplies (1)
🤣
1 likeThe interviewer looks so much like the guy from Pawn Stars it’s distracting.
0 likesLet me get an expert in here who knows over aggressive assholes with guns.
Ok best I can do is 20 years in prison.
god is anyone else cringing at the way the defence is speaking in his closing statement or whatever. it feels so condescending. like im a three year old and someone's overprotective mom is telling me how its actually my fault they threw sand in my eyes
0 likesFree JCS, YouTube. We demand this content.
1 likeThis is so sad. The fact that this father collapsed in front of his son and died before he could raise his children and live out his life hurts my soul. Obviously he shouldn’t have pushed the man down like that but the man could have just pressed charges for battery yet he chose cold blooded murder of a father. I’m so glad police came back to this case and did the right thing.
1647 likesReplies (71)
If you do not want things to get violent, don't get violent. The psycho exited a building and immediately engaged in violence. Up to that point it was a non violent situation.
121 likesI think it’s got a happy ending. Two fewer violent people in the world and not endangering me.
58 likesHe made the correct choice
8 likes@J Money He used his gun because he misunderstood the law and he thought he was good to go to use whatever force necessary to end what he considered a legitimate threat. Like street justice is somehow US law. And shit like you just said is probably why buddy was actually scared for his life and used the gun. His father probably said those exact words to him just like you're probably gonna say to your own kids and your and my father said to us. So you're perpetuating the same nonsense that precipitated this incident in the first place. On the other side, you and I both know people that are okay with what Drejka did even in light of the retreat once the piece came out. Setting what is actually legal aside, they would say he got what was coming to him for attacking someone unprovoked like that. How about we find a middle ground here where we can acknowledge that it's: 1. not cool to physically attack someone just because they said something to your woman you didn't like, and 2. also beyond insane to think you get to shoot someone for pushing you to the ground. There's no good guy here. Drejka should have been minding his own business, yes. Still dude shouldn't have run up and pushed him to the ground over words. Ultimately, Drejka was way out of line pulling the trigger and he's legit a murderer, but if any one person in this scenario had actually had a cool head and actually behaved civilly, everybody goes home intact and no babies lose their fathers, right in front of their own innocent eyes. I just cannot imagine the damage this did to those children. I give nobody a free pass when it comes to how it effects their kids.
62 likes@FullMetal_ They both thought they were above the law. The family thought they could illegally park and physically attack people with no consequences and the gun dude thought he could murder people free of charge. Lesson learned.
50 likes@Frederik Brandt if you are inside the car you made a stop, is not the same as parking.
16 likes@Cody Parin That "psycho" was protecting his family from a crazed aggressor.
55 likes@commoguru What aggression exactly? I see him talking then gets pushed…. The issue is people want to be able to assault you without being shot.
11 likes@Jonathan Walker He was acting aggressively towards the woman & 3 children. You don't approach a car like that & confront the occupants, that's how pretty much every road rage incident starts out. The victim had no way of knowing his killers intentions towards his woman & 3 kids, you can't fault a man for getting a bit too aggressive when they feel their family might be in danger. The bottom line is the shooter is 100% in the wrong, you don't initiate confrontations like that when you are concealed carrying a firearm, that's the first thing you are taught in CC class. This entire thing could have been avoided by the shooter simply minding his own business & not getting involved which is EXACTLY what he should have done when carrying concealed, this is 100% the fault of the shooter.
57 likes@Frederik Brandt I think illegally parking is a little less severe than shooting someone because they pushed you...
42 likesWell they also train you (at least I was) when you have a firearm on you NEVER put yourself in a bad spot. I.E. yelling at a lady about a parking spot. Keep to yourself and drive on.
11 likes@Frederik Brandt 💯 this. Moral of the story for all parties: don't break the law. This tragedy could have been prevented if a) the family hadn't taken up a handicap spot, b) the father hadn't physically assaulted the guy (could've just said "leave my family alone" and gotten in his car to drive away), and/or c) the dude hadn't responded to a shove with deadly force. This is what happens when people let their egos cloud their judgment 😑
11 likesdont go around getting violent and not expecting repercussions lol
6 likes@bongobruh It’s not too late to delete that.
13 likesY’all will really perform useless mental gymnastics to defend murder, especially if a black person is the victim. Even when there’s an entire video dissecting why it was wrong. I can’t bro-
31 likes@:Whatarehumans:3 I may be misreading things, but I think the majority of people here are in agreement that violence is not the answer when it comes to solving problems. Out of the two, the shooter was by far the most violent and was punished for it (though not severely enough imo). I'm sure there are a couple of exceptions, but I don't think most people see what the shooter did as OK.
5 likes@Linkreincarnation92 I don’t get why you’re telling me this, since my comment is aimed at specific people. Obviously the people that actually don’t think that murdering that father was right are not the ones that I’m addressing.
4 likes@:Whatarehumans:3 ah I gotcha. Wasn't sure who you meant by y'all cuz the original comment and most of these replies seem to agree with you. But yeah there are always those few people who just don't get it 😑
1 like@:Whatarehumans:3 that's okay I don't plan on deleting it
1 like@bongobruh That’s too bad, shame you wasted a whole reply only to say something so incredibly stupid.
5 likes@Cody Parin true words
1 like@Frofro frofro yes, that man should never have pushed the other man down. It was aggressive, scary, and certainly uncalled for however, the point is that taking a life is going so much further. The guy who got pushed had every right to brandish his firearm but when he did, the black guy was turning away and stepping back. The fight was over. That’s how it should have ended yet the white guy decided to shoot when the threat was no longer present. That’s what we in the western world call murder and it is highly immoral and illegal. You don’t get to take someone’s life just bc they pushed you. If the man was still attacking him, then it would be justified but that’s not what happened here.
21 likesI agree with what you said. He shouldn’t have put hands on him, doing that cost his life. Smh
1 like@Cody Parin one how is he a “psycho” man was yelling at his partner with kids in the car like that’s an okay thing to do. yes maybe he wasn’t able to see the kids but to yell at someone for just parking there while they went in quickly should’ve not been that big of an issue you have to yell at someone because people do it all the time. he was concerned for his parter and i would have tried to stop someone from yelling at my partner too. secondly he wasn’t even ruining out of the store he seen waht was going on and tried to stope because how could he see the situation from inside the store. in the video you can see him try to move AWAY from the guy when he seen the gun but he yet shot him. so you tell me how he’s a “psycho”
5 likes@Jonathan Walker just because someone pushes you don’t mean you shoot. think about it kids fight in school and they fight back when have you ever seen someone pull out a gun and shoot at someone for being pushed.
2 likes@bongobruh how is shooting someone okay? i was raid to use equal force not to shoot there’s a difference. he was unarmed and had no clue of the situation but seen him yelling at his wife and kids in the car.
2 likes@Cody Parin I'm a little unclear. Are you defending the shooter? And are you calling the victim a psycho, or the shooter?
1 like@Cody Parin are you slow or something?
2 likesYou mean "obviously he shouldn't have assaulted someone." It's sad that people can't seem to think clearly when looking at this video. The demonstrated action is violence on the part of the man who was shot. Him taking a step back and turning doesn't indicate retreating, he could easily be pulling a weapon.
1 likeMichael here shouldn't have shot, but the idea that the slightest backward motion indicates retreat is absurd.
@Jasper Holloway as yes self defense and school shootings
1 like@Grimm Reaper Moving backwards isn't retreating. It could be a lot of things. Retreating would be running the fuck away, not simply turning and taking a slow step away.
1 likeDo that when a cop orders you to freeze and see if you're shot or not. You most probably will be, because the officer might think you're trying to remove a concealed weapon, etc.
Lately it seems that so many people are angry so we must do the right thing. I hate knowing that people are just walking around with loaded weapons. That man had other choices.
1 likeThe sa truth Is that not only was he a victim of this assholes action but his own as well
0 likes@Cody Parin If someone was yelling and arguing with MY WIFE, the love of my life, I would too get confrontational, a man has to protect what he loves.
0 likes@Michal Sextion I think verbally reprimanding someone for illegally parking their car is a lot less severe than pushing somebody to the ground from behind.
1 like@Jasper Holloway shut up ❤
0 likes@Michal Sextion pushed you to the ground than stood above you? Yeah he deserved it I would have done the same. That’s why I live in Florida I wish someone would try to do this to me
0 likes@IAM ChickenSalad I guess you conveniently forgot the shooter was assaulted 1st. Good shooting!
2 likes@dean corrigan who
0 likes@Bill Bradsky drejka literally said he was scared to get a beating, he never said he was scared for his life.
0 likes@Cody Parin.. I’m sure you’d do the same thing if you saw a random ass man yelling in your girlfriend’s face, weirdo. He had every right.
0 likesso what? Who tf told him he could park there? he didn't look disabled, his wife didn't look disabled, the kid didn't look disabled, ALL OF THEM WERE PERFECTLY OK AND HEALTHY ENOUGH TO PARK SOMEWHERE ELSE AND WALK TO THE STORE. He didn't to himself
0 likes@Zedmouse maybe not die, but he had to learn why it's so important to have some manners and follow the rules. He really had no need to park there. He was a stupid man.
0 likes@Jan Lima I don’t think stupid is right but probably careless and a bit selfish which is worse but he was also a father and he didn’t need to die in front of his kids over a parking spot
1 like@Zedmouse And that's why it's better to ALWAYS follow the rules. You never know when you're gonna encounter a crazy guy like the one from the video. Like I said, he did it to himself.
1 likeIf my husband saw some guy at the car window yelling at me and we had small children in the car, he would definitely push him down. He was protecting his family from this wanna be mini mall security guard.
2 likes@Cody Parin If someone was harassing your wife, would you just sit there and let them in front of your children? Shooting someone for pushing you isn't the response.
0 likes@Cody Parin If you watched the CCTV footage, Marquis (I'm not sure how to spell his name) simply pushed this man away from his wife. Witnesses say there was a lot of yelling which could have caused this reaction. However, you can see Marquis back up and put his arm across his wife in a protecting manner. Until Michael shot him. I also believe that Michael brought up that his shoulder hurt as soon as he was in the room with the detective. Now, I'm not saying you're wrong but I think Marquis is more justifiable in this situation than Michael is.
0 likes@Jasper Holloway Not the stereotypical racist comment. Yes there is gang violence but you cannot assume that every person of color isn’t carrying to protect themselves or their family. Guns do fall into the wrong hands ALOT, and it falls into hands like this man who knows his white privilege, as to how he talks to officers, and they act like they are equal or above the law (vigilante).
0 likes@Cody Parin i guess you missed the part where he has been aggressive to four other people with a gun. This man is a psyco.
0 likes@Cody Parin Psycho? He was defending his wife that coward was verbally abusing. He drew a firearm and shot despite the man backing away. You don't get a license to kill because someone touched you.
0 likes@Kim K you don't know if someone is unarmed. You can have knife or gun hidden
0 likesDefending his women from a argument? Be honest and don’t appeal to extremes.. he was murdered but he definitely was the first to physical but a push doesn’t make it okay to shoot someone
0 likes@J Money Agreed 100% that that would have been my advice. Don't bother people or play policemen. Especially if you are an armed lard ass that asks to get his ass kicked.
0 likesHe pushed him because that SH was behaving threatening to his kids and girlfriend. The violence was started verbally by this guys shouting violently.
0 likes@dean corrigan who?
0 likes@Frederik Brandt I don’t think it’s that simple.
0 likes@Jonathan Walker Wow.
0 likes@Frofro frofro Attack my family in a violent shouting tantrum and I’ll end up in jail because I’d do more than push. He wouldn’t have a chance his gun.
0 likesHe did nothing wrong. If a MAN is arguing with his woman he should defend her and get the “man” tf outta her face. This weak yt man couldn’t stand being pushed by a stronger man- he’s weak and was butt hurt period.
0 likes@Staci W We shouldn’t encourage everyone to do whatever they want, break the law, get aggressive when confronted for breaking a law. This guy didn’t have to fire his weapon, no idea why he would do that, but let’s not pretend the fake disabled guy who shoved someone onto the pavement is a victim, because he’s not.
0 likesThe father was the aggressor. The father pushed him hard after a running start and was looking at him like what's up, waiting for him to get up so he can punch him and fight.
0 likesI found the white guy to be very honest about his actions and the distant between them. And I am a liberal who wanted kyle and Chauvin to be found guilty. But I can also understand why Kyle was not.
Don't assault people. Period. The black guy and his girlfriend were looking for a fight after the white guy simply spoke his mind about them illegally parking in a handicap spot with plenty of spots around them. That was stupid and ignorant of them. This guy did nothing wrong.
Shouldn't park in a handicap spot
0 likes@:Whatarehumans:3 haven’t seen anyone really saying it’s okay. Only one weirdo saying he deserved it. All they’re saying is he didn’t need to get violent with him that quickly and that situation more than likely wouldn’t have happened. Still, the shooter was 100% in the wrong
0 likes@Schmidtygt I didn’t say anyone said it was okay. And besides I’ve seen at least 12 comments in this reply defending the murder of that man. I don’t even see why you’re telling me this? If you feel the shooting was wrong then just say that, you don’t have to tell me that you don’t see any proof of my statement when there is- because a single push is not enough to justify taking someone’s life. Especially when there’s a video that has already dissected the situation.
0 likes@Cody Parin ‘psycho’? A man is shouting at his wife and 2 kids while circling their car. Maybe you don’t have the balls to confront someone that’s harassing your family, but other men do. Yeah he probably shouldn’t have pushed him over, but don’t try to act like him being pissed was unjustified.
0 likesWe all should learn from that. Dont attack strangers just because you dont like what they say. Moronic move bitterly punished.
0 likes@Cody Parin Nobody needed to die here. It's plain and simple. Marquis wasn't threatening anyone with serious injury or death. It really didn't escalate that much, and anybody who is well trained with firearms will tell you that if someone is BACKING AWAY from you, nonthreatening, walking away after you point a gun at them, you don't shoot.
0 likes@Cody Parin he was a man protecting his own. mind your own fucking business and things would never have a reason to escalate. if the races were flipped he’s be seen as a hero for doing this
0 likes@Carl Johannesburg I literally considered that in my original comment. What’s wrong with you? You don’t have to be so rude. I get everyone has an opinion but you could at least be respectful about it. And the stupid thing is I totally agree with you.
0 likes@The Ikon Channel This case showed that it indeed is. He paid a pretty high price for that. I dont think he would have been shot down when he just intervened verbally but he wanted to show his "alpha" status there. This ignorance did cost him pretty much everything. (watch him walking to his car kinda relaxed with hands in pockets. He wasnt really concerned)
0 likesThis is why 1v1 Street fights should be legal nationwide. No jumping, no stomping after a knockdown, just fair one v one hand to hand fuckin combat lol
1 likeHe was there harassing the woman for parking in a handicap spot but was parked illegally himself.
0 likesdon't park in a handicap spot if you don't have the sign on your dashboard...you wont get killed
1 likeReplies (1)
a fucking parking violation doesn’t mean you should get murdered. if your father was speeding would you blame him for getting murdered?
0 likesIf you get arrested 1 word Lawyer, and this guy reminded me of tackleberry, and Karen 😳
0 likesclassic case of mind your own business and dont start shit
0 likesJim, I cannot express enough how your work has impacted me. Seeing the way you break these videos down is awe inspiring. Your the detective I never want on my case because I know you would get me no matter what. Your intelligence and delivery is impeccable.
42 likesBecause of you and how you do this I have been inspired to go back to University and take Criminal Psychology. Truly interesting material. Thank you my friend and I hope your channel never stops. #Lifelongfan
Replies (1)
Good luck to you in pursuing your dreams! I live hearing things like this happen. This channel is changing lives! 😀
2 likesI'M SORRY BUT FIRST OF ALL, WHY DO PEOPLE JUST CASUALLY HAVE GUNS IN THEIR POCKETS? LIKE WTF? fricking America and their laws..
2 likesThing is , there were open spots. Just park in a different spot dude. Could of been avoided easily
0 likesReplies (1)
oh my fucking god how many more times do i have to say this PARKING VIOLATION DOESNT NOT EQUAL TAKING SOMEONES LIFE
0 likesBeing a white knight never pays off
1 likeHe really got mc glocked
0 likesIs anyone going to point out that strange handshake at 4:10
0 likesThis guy is such an idiot. If you’re ever in this situation you just say ”I don’t remember” and “things just happened so fast. I have no idea.”
0 likes- So where did he come from?
“I really have no idea.”
- At what point did you fire your weapon?
“Things just happened so fast. I have no idea.”
- What would you say if I told you he didn’t step towards you and in fact took a couple steps back instead?
”I would say that I wish that the entire thing was a blur. I’m just trying to tell you how I remember it happening the best way I can. I was scared for my life.”
Lawyers can be such soulless people. Both of them, not just the defendant.
0 likeshis wrist sure did heal quick
1 likeHe shot the guy only once, his intent was not to kill.
0 likesIn his own (wrongful) mind it was self defense.
A woman (i saw on this channel) had killed her baby and lied to the cops....and was let free.
This man, yeah, shot and killed a guy, but it clearly wasn't his intent and he told the absolute truth about what happened.
See the difference?
A baby murdering psycho got away LEGALLY, while this guy got 20 years.
Replies (2)
LOL she was smart enough to hire a capable defense attorney.
1 like@J Q true dat
0 likesZero self deffence that was murder ur life was not in danger he did not continue to assault u after he pushed u he was simply getting u away from his women because u were Ina hostile state of mind you are simply a nosey coward who should have minded his business
1 likePeople shouldn't have a gun in the first place
0 likesGeorge and Michelle talking. 🤣
0 likesLol @ 50:13 , what the hell is he writing!? XD
0 likesPut him under the jail
0 likestbh... I feel like the black man was aggressive (understandably) from the time he pulled his pant's up until the time he made first contact with the victim. What a weird way to ask someone what the problem is. pushing them to the ground...
0 likesReplies (1)
Some might say it's a deadly threat considering the age gap...
0 likesThat is the problem why is someone not teaching them 1. Mind their business and 2 they can go to jail just was well as everyone else…. Just stupid he really looked like he thought he did what was “ok” for “him” to do. Smh he thought it would be nothing even in his verdict he looked angry that how dare they hold him accountable. Smh
0 likesFrom the tape I see that the guy from the shop applied physical force first (so, he escalated the existing conflict started by the armed guy), and he intended to do something else right before the guy pointed a gun at him. The fatal mistake of the armed guy was to shoot in the impulse of feelings for revenge. Do not escalate conflicts. The big guy from the shop evaluated the guy as a danger for the family? I do not think so, he, apparently, simply did not like the rude tone and allowed himself for the escalation. He is also sort of guilty, though, the price he paid was way too high. Peace.
0 likesI usually don’t feel much empathy for anyone, but this is just stupid. That life just got wasted. Someone died for NOTHING no reason at all 💀
0 likesPsychos They aren’t good liars
0 likesI'm getting sore cause he pushed me... * moves around alot for 30 minutes the officer comes in* ohhhh ow left hand....
0 likesclearly racially motivated
6 likesDamn Florida man, as usual.
0 likesIt’s fascinating to me that when the detective asks him how many steps the man took toward him, he says in full confidence, “One,” like he’s some kind of super-observant marksman; when in reality he just gave away that he understood what he was doing and was in complete control the whole time and not reacting out of fear/perceived threat.
45 likesEdit: nevermind the fact that the man actually stepped AWAY from the shooter
His response to finding out the guy died is so hollow.
129 likesSad someone died because he felt trigger happy
Replies (2)
Christopher Crentsil he got quieter but I think that was only because he realized that he was in deeper shit at that point. All he had to say was more to try to justify his shitty actions. I hope he gets the full 30 years behind bars.
9 likesHis lawyer had the nerve to say the defendant is the true victim.....he clearly didn't give a shit about his client to come up with a better closing argument
2 likesThese videos make me very happy that I am not American. Greetings from Denmark
0 likesAre we gonna ignore the fact that this clown started a quarrel with the family for illegally parking despite him ILLEGALLY parking too?
2107 likesReplies (57)
It’s what racists do. Berating black people just for the sake of it.
141 likesRules for thee but not for me
52 likes@CatRoxy86 not just blacks tf
22 likes@CatRoxy86 so what? He's another potential killer off the streets
3 likes@CatRoxy86 actually,he approached the car not knowing the fact that the woman was black so I think he could have done that to anyone. He just wanted to seek for trouble..
54 likesnah its every other comment saying that lol
1 like@Gioconda He wanted and was looking for trouble.
6 likes@DjkittyOTK we know the truth
1 like@DjkittyOTK whatever weeb
4 likes2 wrongs dont make a right.
0 likes@Gioconda nah those windows weren't tinted he saw she was black don't play yourself even from far you can tell....
3 likesI think it’s more for the fact that they were in the handicap stop and not the fact that it’s illegally parked
1 likeThe difference in that is that one is enforceable and one is not. One inconveniences average people, the other does a lot more than inconvenience people who already have it hard enough.
1 like@Gordoarturo69 dunno..you(and I ) weren't in the scene so..
0 likes@Mansnotprot what are you trying to say with that comment?
0 likes@Mansnotprot And?? Nobody said they wasnt breaking the law, but ultimately their actions didn't put anyone life in danger. That's like saying jay walking is as bad as 1st degree murder. No matter if his intentions were good, the killer can't just go around acting like he can enforce laws as he pleases: he's not being paid to be a recognized figure of the public that knows & enforces laws. His initial confrontation can be seen as harrassment, doesnt mean I can try and arrest him for it. Harping on what the victims did just distracts from the fact that the killer should've just called police instead of acting like he is.
3 likes@Gioconda me being a good person would approach the vehicle and tell them that they parked in a handicap spot without a tag, and hope that they respond nicely rather than start yelling at me.
0 likesThe problem is, is that she wasn't illegally parked in the first place. handicap spaces have the same law as fire zones: you can park in them as long as the driver is in the car and can get out of the way if needed, which is why the detective asked him around 16:30 if the car was running. She literally did nothing wrong.
5 likes@FistSaidToTheFace Hmm I did not know about that. I would like to apologize for my previous comments then.
1 likeThank you for informing me on that.
are we also gonna ignore the fact that someone assaulted another human being for...getting angry at their wife...?
1 like@Master Dodger ah yes, as if that excuses manslaughter.
2 likes@Gioconda and the guy who shoved him to the ground wasnt seeking trouble?
0 likesThe last thing the comment section has done is ignore that
0 likes@Deshra Dine All parking spaces in front are closer to entrance. I'm handicapped. She was in the car, as allowed by law, and could move out, if needed.
0 likes@Mansnotprot ...and use the bathrooms, elevators, ticket lines, transit seats, et al.
0 likesAnd then they assaulted him...
0 likes@Giocondapeople I know own a buisness here in town.. People are always parking in handicap spots in front if his store.. He tells them to move 4 a few reasons... A. Police will ticket you.
1 likeB. Handicap people require those spots.
C. Open your eyes.. Wake up.. Don't be a Dick to handicap people..
He was disabled he was in the army get ya facts straight before using the race card
0 likes@Paul Burke yeah...but that doesn't explain why he shot him though..
1 likeI mean,I perfectly agree with what u said,but still he illegally parked too and shot a man that was retreating..
@Gioconda I hear you... Its full of aggravated intent and action on both sides... Plenty of personal choice.. The problems arise because at least in my mind is that while one person may shy away from a gun in hand like they don't want to get shot it doesnt mean its ever over. In fact its often just begining... And it can be an ongoing issue for all people involved... I think fear of those conciquences caused a man to shoot another...consider why one man physically assaults tge other and that could be a deciding factor in pulling the trigger... Sane people don't attack others over a verbal argument... He may have thought if I don't he will just attack k me later when my gun is concealed and my back is turned.. Clearly it wasnt an issue debated for long in regards to the initial assaulter because he assaulted an unaware individual.. How many people have died from being blindsided and punched?? Plenty... No gun or weapon doesnt mean the assault isn't deadly... I tho k he shot the man because he was afraid for his life... An attack liie this is quite jarring.. Sudden.. The choice to shoot looked like he paused and decided that the assault was enough no matter the manner of retreat.. Ive been tge victim of a senseless physical assault.. Not committing to my iwn defense has left me with a tbi and has stolen aspects of my personality... If I had followed through in my own defense ID at least not be burdened with a disabling reminder... Uf Soneone assaults you your best to just defend yourself fully. Its not worth it to allow the resulting issues from giving the assaulter the bennifit of doubt... Because some people don't stop until you or someone else stops them.. With a bullet or fist.. In this case the man whom was assaulted his disadvantage is his size.. Strength and his inability to have seen the threat until it was assaulting him and then the further steps past the assault to further the intimidation and threat... I say justified... Hell have to disappear fir his protection...
0 likes@dadillonful ?
0 likesVery VALID. CLOWN is a terrific word for that punk.
0 likes@Frances Gray he wasn't disable thou...
0 likes@Jesus Valdez I think that u don't really have the right to say what's wrong or not,because it will always be your opinion,and what is right for u can be the opposite for another. Anyway,I think that if they swap places (the black man shot the white man) we wouldn't be here talking about it..
1 like@Jesus Valdez do u know how many people do that right?..
0 likes@Paul Burke I'm sorry, I don't understand. Even though u were so scared that u would pull a gun,if u saw him retreating (almost) no one would have took a life for nothing. He could have pull the gun then,Seeing him retreating, he could have said a simple" Come any closer and I will shoot",or I don't know.. ANYTHING. And there's the fact that,as we know,he was in the military so he knows what he's doing and where he is shooting...so why the heck shoot him in heart?? I'm talking about an experienced man here. Why not,as the lawyer said, in the foot or In the shoulder,in one of his leg ??? I don't know...I mean I think it's better Hurt him than kill him. If someone with no experience at all(about shooting a gun) was that scared to shoot him in a pretty deadly/dangerous place,he still wouldn't shoot him in the heart because he isn't capable of (the black man was walking/moving,so if u really have no experience is really hard to shot him straight in the heart) .
1 like@Gioconda I think life shows us different... I think one man chose to violently assault another.. Blindsided... While you or Someone else would have done differently the fact is we werent there.. We arent the one being attacked...i think he was within his rights to shoot due to the nature of which he was assaulted.. Meaning no reason for the initial assault or physical violence.. The driving force and motive seem to me to be reckless..ill advised..unsane... As if there was no concern or discerning of threat requiring actual violence... Meaning psychotic... The treat to life still exists... Bottom line...irrational actions of violence shouldnt be given leanancy in a defense... The psychotic assault is enough to warrent defense of individual life and liberty with deadly force...
0 likes@Paul Burke as I said before,he was in the military. I don't know what u exactly do in there(I've never been in the military) but the thing that I'm certain is that it's not easy to get in. this kind of experience he all have been practicing it. So what I'm saying here is that he knew what he was doing,and instead of hurting him badly he decided to kill him. There's no justification in that. I wouldn't have said all this if he was a person without an experience in this kind of things. Secondly,no one is in right to kill another human being.
1 like@CatRoxy86 Right..not because of their actions.
0 likes@Gioconda I agree.. He knew what he was doing... Training kicks in... I do kniw that.. But training gets amendments as you survive and watch others die... It looked to me like the guy that got shot was all pumped up to make some hurt on the other guy until the defensive weapon was out . fear yes comes next for both... Could you imagine surviving war just to come home to be snuffed out by some jerk off wanna be bad boy??? Out to flex on you??.. Over a verbal argument involving parking issues???... Arent you mad that this was part of what at least one black male thought was appropriate actions???.. I am... And im only black by association...
0 likesHall Monitor syndrome. Probably wanted to be a cop, probably couldn't do it. It's the same issue plaguing the "bad" cops.
0 likes@Dave Baton do these confrontations involve people threatening him with physical violence when hes only verbally confronting others???... And is he justified or within his rights like everyone else to take part in verbal discorse without a need for physical violence until a threat is made to harm him or someone else??.....
0 likes@FormulaZR that's everybody... Everyone git bad attitudes... Delusions of being bigger and badder than the situation or life requires... And usually its been found to be true that these incidents require several Narsacistic and deluded personallities to transpire.. One side will argue they have the right to physically assault someone because of words they over heard... In this case it seems that it indeed is the case.. To prevent being shot in this senario or shooting someone lets walk through it to see what's causing the event to unfold and willingly manifest... Did anyone have to assault someone physically here.??... Did someone physically assault someone??.. Did the assault seem justified as a defensive act??.. Is tge shooting required?? Is the use of a firearm justified by law and by threat???... Is there a history of threat to harm physically a valid reaction??.. If the verbal arguments didn't involve the shooter initiating a physical threat verbally or physically than depending on state or county laws he is within his rights to announce his firearm as a defensive weapon if there is a threat made verbally or physically by other parties involved... Meaning if one person isn't making threats to harm or in any way hurt or kill in the space or duration of a verbal argument and another party is threatening physical harm to body or property either in the moment or as a promusary threat of intention than a verbalized announcement of intent to defend ones life is legal.. And it is the instigating threat if violence death or bodily harm that is seen as the guilty or offending party... Meaning arguments can be had over parking spaces without threatening to harm someone... But physically assaulting someone like we see in the video is not legal and can be seen as intent to do all the things criminally people have problems with... If one person says anything about harming another or states intent to kill before the mention of a gun then it is the original offense of threat physically that isn't justifiable with physical assault... That's self defense law..
0 likesNo, that’s was very obviously implied in the video and I doubt anyone missed it
0 likes@Mansnotprot You were correct. @fistsaidtotheface is incorrect.
0 likes@Zono It would've been ruled justified had he let his lawyer do the talking.
0 likes@Jésus S Killing isn't necessarily illegal, murder is. If someone attacks you and you take their life in self defense it is a justified killing, not murder. Intent is a necessary component.
0 likes@Gioconda Why shoot in the heart? Because we are trained to aim for center mass.
0 likes@Gioconda How did he know that Markeis didn't have a weapon and wasn't taking cover to fire back?
0 likes@Gioconda self-defense, Florida is a stand your ground law state, meaning no duty to retreat and justification for deadly force when someone assaults you. (as always with the law, it depends on the situation, but the law reads "right to use reasonable force" applying it to this case, Drejka was on the ground after being assaulted, he would've been justified legally had he not spoken to police and let his lawyer use the law for his defense).
0 likes@FormulaZR incorrect assumption. Many precincts have a program that will allow citizens to send pictures of vehicles that park illegally in handicap spaces so that they can ticket the offenders. Doesn't require being an officer.
0 likesShe did. She even admitted to speaking with him first.
0 likes@Cecile King Incorrect. From the 2020 statues on handicap parking in Florida. "316.1955 Enforcement of parking requirements for persons who have disabilities.—
0 likes(1) It is unlawful for any person to stop, stand, or park a vehicle within, or to obstruct, any such specially designated and marked parking space provided in accordance with s. 553.5041, unless the vehicle displays a disabled parking permit issued under s. 316.1958 or s. 320.0848 or a license plate issued under s. 320.084, s. 320.0842, s. 320.0843, or s. 320.0845, and the vehicle is transporting the person to whom the displayed permit is issued."
This is similar to how EVERY handicap parking law is written. So NO, one cannot even STOP a car in a handicapped space without having the proper placard/tag.
The ONLY exception in FL is this; " (3) Any person who is chauffeuring a person who has a disability is allowed, without need for a disabled parking permit or a special license plate, to stand temporarily in any such parking space, for the purpose of loading or unloading the person who has a disability. A penalty may not be imposed upon the driver for such temporary standing."
The law is clear, if you don't have a plate/placard, you don't even stop your vehicle in that space.
It would behoove you to actually know the laws before making incorrect statements regarding them. Yes she was illegally parked, and in the wrong.
@Paul Burke No matter what...you feel murdering another for a push is justified. If you saw a man verbally assaulting your wife with children in car ...would you be concerned? The gun holder was a coward and made an irresponsible irreversible decision regarding another human's life that he did not value in his rush to be right
0 likesRight!
0 likes@Cecile King i feel murder can happen from a push... It has happened.. One punch can and has killed people old and young... Further more an argument over a parking spot does not require a physical assault like we saw here... Do you??... Its a sign of really poor judgment... Possibly an issue regarding psychosis.. I played football and getting hit from behind is illegal for a reason... People can get extreemly hurt ir worse... Those that commit the fouls get flagged or ejected... Penalties... Im not saying life is a game of football.. Its dead serious... And everybody needs to see that as clear in this video...
0 likes@Cecile King secondly... I don't have a wife.. If I did she wouldnt be knowingly parking in a handicap spot.. And she wouldnt be arguing with someone over it if she had.. And of course im not into women that would..
0 likesThis is America
0 likesDon't catch you slippin' now
Don't catch you slippin' now
Look what I'm whippin' now
This is America
This is what this case remember me
the cops were so nice to this guy to keep him talking and make him comfortable. if the the cops were aggressive with him he probably would have asked for a lawyer.. they did a great job..
573 likesReplies (22)
He should have asked for a lawyer. Any decent lawyer worth their salt would have had the charges dismissed before ever going before a jury. The lawyer would have instantly pointed out that the moment of "hesitation" before firing was caused by disorientation from falling so violently.
27 likes@Southern Soul do not tell me ur trying to defend this guy and justify his actions wtf?
16 likes@DoyouknowJOGIJOGI? No, I'm not a defense lawyer, something he never had.
7 likes@Southern Soul too bad you weren’t there to save your brethren
5 likes@Ichinek I don’t think he’s defending him he’s just making the point that with the correct legal team this guy could’ve gotten away with murder
34 likesHe doesn't deserve a lawyer anyway.
2 likes@Southern Soul lol no he would go to prison all day guy
1 like@Southern Soul Nah it's on video, you can't initiate a confrontation and then kill someone when they react to you shit talking their wife and children.
6 likes@Southern Soul bad bait
1 like@Southern Soul a lawyer would tell him to say nothing at all to anyone.
1 like@DoyouknowJOGIJOGI? you know there’s plenty of lawyers who defend killers, rapists, pedos because it’s their job? have you seen the other video of a lawyer smiling after getting a Mom who drowned her daughter a Not Guilty verdict? while completely morally wrong, it’s their job
4 likesi usually watch that part of the video but i couldnt watch it this time, he took a mans life but it feels like he got a slap on the wrist
0 likes@Southern Soul i see you're getting targeted by everybody for defending the guy though you're just saying what he should have done FOR HIMSELF and to save himself and not what he should have done for justice
4 likes@pyluts 2 there has to be people who defends the bad guy as hard as they can, just in case things were more complicated than it appears to be.
2 likesnot a big deal for us who watch, just another fucked up guy better throw him in prison anyways, but no it's still a life on the line
@Southern Soul how did this get any likes. No defense lawyer would have got him off. From a criminal justice lawyer
0 likesTRUMP 2020-FOREVER So if the dead victim was your loved one, you'd want the shooter to be pardoned?
0 likesTRUMP 2020-FOREVER And did you notice the victim was already backing off? This doesn't appear to be self-defence.....
0 likesSouthern Soul I have to agree. No one should talk to the police without a lawyer, regardless of the situation/innocence/guilt....
1 likeReading someone their right should be interpreted as "do you want a lawyer? Because here's the part where we incriminate you." So many people disregard their rights n sign away like it's the check at the end of a meal.
1 like@0 0 Everyone should demand a lawyer to be present, 'deserving' or not.
1 like@Lloyd Cipher He got 20 years for manslaughter, I think. Not a slap on the wrist (although he did hurt his wrist in the assault, apparently) 😁
0 likesThey played their cards well
0 likesAs a disabled veteran with handicap plates on my vehicle, it is a pet peeve of mine as well when people take up ADA handicap designated parking without proper plates or placards, but I wouldn't shoot someone over it. Even if the gentleman pushed me down, I'd just call the cops and press charges for the assault. It was wrong for that guy to shove the shooter down, but that definitely wasn't an "eye for an eye" situation. The shooter was definitely in the wrong for shooting that man.
778 likesReplies (57)
i can understand drawing a firearm after the initial shove to the ground, but once the guy saw the gun, he backed off. thats when Michael here should have put his gun away and called the police.
86 likesAn eye lash for an eye
38 likesKAREN!!! & BOOMER LOL
3 likesThe funny thing is that the Ada designated parking slot was further away from the entrance than the normal parking area 🤪 to say anything to the woman parking further away would be stupid af.
14 likes" gentleman"
3 likesI’m sure you wouldn’t yell at a woman in a parking lot either! Of course the boyfriend would’ve felt protective over her, with some random strange man yelling at her in front of their kids. No excuse for what he did at all.
25 likesHow bout gun control. It's a serious problem in the US. A person got killed here and he's not even sorry one bit and worried about his injured arm and his family. Like dude you just killed a father in front of his kids for absolutely no reason. We didn't hear the argument but Marquist saw Michael being 'aggressive' with his wife and arguing and shoved him as a 'wtf get away from my wife and kids' reaction. Seriously though GUN CONTROL! Cause these situations only happen in the US.
20 likesI think we all know what he really felt threatened by. It wasn't being pushed to the ground - it was being pushed by a black man. No amount of backing away could have altered that perception.
12 likes@Litzalocks Get yourself a drink and calm down🤦♂️😅 your aggression is ridiculous and would probably lead to the same situation we saw here.
4 likesI see no problem in parking in a disabled spot, as long as I'm in the car and can get away immediately when a disabled person arrives.
My point was that the disabled parking spot was further away than the ordinary ones which makes no sense. So if I couldn't walk that good I'd prefer to take a spot closer to the door.
Where I'm from disabled parking spots are the ones that are closest to the door and that by law....
@Litzalocks Don't assume they need to ask me🤦♂️ I'll leave immediately as soon someone arrives... It's absolutely OK and I never had any problems with any kind of aggression or even a bad look.
1 likeand yes, you sound aggressive. If this I your normal behavior I know why you can't see this...cause it's normal for you.
I said where I'm from. Where could you know where this is and how it's handled here? 😅🤦♂️
@Litzalocks 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
0 likes@Litzalocks I'm the reason for disabled person getting their life harder and I don't respect them cause I park in a disabled spot while sitting in the car and leaving immediately as soon as another car arrives? You're insane
0 likes@Rowan Thomas sadly gun control wouldn’t really work in America since they already have so many guns. It really only works if a country does it before they have a lot of guns in circulation
1 like@Fluse Int. ur not in the right. But going up to someone and fighting them in a parking lot about it is not ok. I would just assume they are a asshole and move on.
0 likesAs a non disabled regular guy I feel the same way.
0 likesI completely agree!
1 like@Milos Korenev bc they are more likely to commit a violent act? seems racist....
0 likes@Diego one word Australia. It can be done. It might be be easy because of what everyone is used to, but like I said, Australia did it, so it can be done.
0 likesWell they were parked there for literally two minutes .... some people just have a problem with minding their own business
0 likes@Rowan Thomas you think people in America would give back their guns?
0 likes@Litzalocks i park where I please. Most people who have handicap permissions are fat. They can use the exercise
0 likesTwo wrongs don't make a right after all.
0 likes@Fluse Int. Bruh I don’t know where you are from but parking in a handicap stop is definitely illegal, definitely not ok and it’s usually the most expensive ticket you can receive from police. It’s more expensive than parking in a fire/emergency Lane.
1 like@Epicriku91 no one is saying that it’s a good reason to shoot someone just because they parked in a handicap spot. If this dude has health problems, he’s not going to want to get into a physical fight. This dude told her to move and that it was wrong and immediately she’s like let me get my man. He gets shoved and he’s already in a bad position defensively. He should’ve pulled his gun and not shot but if the dude was going to keep coming with him on the ground in a terrible position to defend himself then yeah I can see someone getting shot for that. The guy shouldn’t have shoved him just for talking to his girl about parking in a handicap parking spot illegally. Like seriously look at both sides of the ridiculousness here. Drejka shouldn’t have shot, but he also shouldn’t have gotten shoved either.
0 likes@Diego Done control with and work here in America not because of how many guns they already are...... But because it's already so much gun control laws anyways that people just don't realize. Clearly Michael Not have the shoot that guy for getting stuff down but it is justified that if he was being attacked that he was able to pull out his gun. Crazy thing is though is if he didn't have ACWP which is a license to carry a fire arm which I do have then He was carrying a gun illegally... Which is against the law.... Unless of course this is a open carry State
0 likes@Litzalocks he didn’t deserve to die over a handicapped spot though it’s like literally not that serious I understand that it’s a jerk move but like you can’t just go around shooting people he was arguing with a woman and her husband came over and pushed him away because he was probably being aggressive and he shoots him like he didn’t even need to shoot him even if he pulled out his gun he purposely shot him while the dude was backing away from him that dude just wanted to kill somebody
0 likesAs a person with a three digits IQ, I figured out he shiot the dude over physical assaults (that was to be followed by a beat up on the ground), and not over the plate
0 likesGranted the family shouldn't have parked in the disabled spot, but I can understand why given that she had several young kids who can be a handful at times.
0 likesNor should the father shoved the guy for harassing his wife about it. But there was no justification for shooting him after he'd spread his hands and stepped back several times.
My thoughts exactly
0 likes@Rowan Thomas It can't realistically be done. There were just 3 army personnel charged in connection to a huge gun supply ring. Military weapons being stolen and sold on blackmarket inside the US. It will only raise the value of weapons and ammunition and for years only the law abiding citizens will suffer for it, as always. As long as police and military have weapons, they will make their way to the criminals. Are you for diisarming the police? Honest question
1 like@Milos Korenev I bet your black arnt you. I live in London and have been stabbed 3 times. Dosnt mean I carry a knife. I stand my ground and fight. I box travellers often. I don’t often win. But we both walk together with open palms and fight like a man
0 likes@Rowan Thomas "Self defense" on a fleeing assailant has always been murder, doesn't matter what tool is used.
0 likes@Rowan Thomas that’s not going to happen any time soon, seen as the government of texas has allowed that anyone can have a gun.
0 likes@Rowan Thomas gun control won't work most countries that implemented it have ended up with worse problems such as higher gun violence/more tyranny in the government Venezuela (I think) or a increase in knife attacks in the case of Britain or people won't turn in guns at all such as Norway in some place like Australia it does work. Also situations like these don't happen in the U.S. only you just watch news from the U.S. more than you do other countries
0 likes@0riginal what are you, nine?
0 likesWhen the guy backed up after pulling the gun, that could have been enough. Don't shoot the guy geez
1 like@adsffdaaf Because white americans have been conditioned for centuries to perceive blackness as inherently threatening. Which is horrifying, lest you misunderstand me.
0 likes@boozoochamp Standing there and sitting in the car so that you can leave immediately causes no harm and no trouble. This is ridiculous.
0 likes@JungHoseok Slays many of them sound like the guy who shot someone over the parking spot... It's insane 😅
0 likes@Fluse Int.Because i highly doubt you're moving away for every car. Why can't you just park in a normal spot like the rest of us?
0 likesI mean the guy was yelling at his wife while all his kids were in the car, I’m not a father but I’m sure that anyone would get defensive of their family in that situation.
1 like@0riginal Huh
0 likes@Fluse Int. Bruh, why don’t you get it? Just literally don’t park there. What the hell, it’s for their convenience. You just don’t wanna back down huh, literally everyone is agreeing with the disabled spot not being for everyone.
1 like@Epicriku91 It wasn’t a good reason, but it’s a great topic to talk about. Just cuz what happened wasn’t right, doesn’t mean that the victim’s family was spotless clean as well.
0 likes@EXCUSE ME? There is no problem if you don't block it.
0 likes@Fluse Int. Sure, you could be guarding the parking lot and drive away as soon as you see someone, but I highly doubt you're paying that much attention. So why not just park in a normal spot like the rest of us? There's no reason not to.
0 likesIf I was a disabled vet I'd probably draw too, but he clearly backed off after that. There was no reason to shoot except bad judgement. Hard to comment though since I've never been in the military, or pushed down in public, or get annoyed enough to make a scene about some asshole's parking.
1 like@Milos Korenev Sombody always gotta play the race card.
0 likes@JWD It's the reality people live with. No use denying it.
0 likesim not handicapped and that's my biggest pet peeve too i hate when i see people parked in blue parking spaces, but I've never seen one. I've also heard police respond just as fast to illegal handicapped parking don't understand why he took into his own hands except he's a psychopath.
1 like@Milos Korenev I don’t know about that. Being pushed to the ground when you don’t expect it really gets your adrenaline going, the fight or flight reaction takes over.
0 likes@Luuk Where I'm from, and I'm happy it's not America, it's allowed to stay 3 min on almost every spot even if parking isn't allowed there. This short period disturbs nobody and requires your attention to keep an eye on the road...so yes I think I would see it. Anyway in my home country are that much disabled parking spots that this situation never ever occurred.
0 likesViolence causes Violence, don't push people!
0 likes@Upshit Downshit More like an eye for an eyelash.
0 likes@Litzalocks the rest of the world shouldn't have to make your life easier. We didn't make you disabled. Improvise adapt and overcome.
0 likesThe dude wouldn't have even confronted the car if he wasn't carrying a gun. He was looking for trouble.
0 likes@boozoochamp Like I said here before, where I'm from its allowed to stay for 3min almost everywhere while sitting in the car. So don't speak about ridiculousness and tell me I get a ticket😅
0 likesIt's ridiculous that you think I'm doing this to provoke someone. Sometimes it's just the best option. I'll give you a little example perhaps you guys calm down then a little bit since you all seem to have a huge lack of fantasy.
In front of the doctor, where my mom has to go on regular basis just to get a new recipe... So it usually doesn't take longer than the magical 3 mins, which are allowed to stay on a disabled spot while sitting in the car. (Again: Where I'm from🤦♂️😅)
I do it and it's perfectly fine. My mom isn't the youngest woman anymore and I can't go in for her. There has never ever been a salty situation l. Never. Cause everytime a car arrives you'll just leave immediately. This means the disabled person who wants to park has to wait approximately 5-10seconds till I parked out. If this is behaving like an asshole when I'm staying in every rule and law there is, than I'm guilty of being an asshole. But again there has never been a aggressive or stressful situation for anyone. Perhaps it's also the people here without guns and much more respect for each other than in the US I don't know. But here the people are not that aggressive in general. The least of them here could even imagine to kill someone to defend themselves cause there is no need for that. I think the people here are just much more realistic and calm compared to you in the US.
Not the brightest potato peel in the compost heap
1 likeWatching the interview the only thing I’m thinking is this guy has no consideration or no thoughts about the possible consequences or ramifications of his actions. I’m not talking jail time, I’m talking about the possibility of ruining someone’s life, or ending it or both. In this instance he’s ended 1 and ruined 4. Yet at no point in the interview did he put any thought into it, even when he said he heard someone shout “my kids”.
459 likesEdit: it also sounds like this was one of those situations where a lawyer would not have just been good but great. A lawyer would have actually been the difference between jail and walking free. Glad he didn’t get one coz I know that dad didn’t deserve being shot let alone murdered.
Replies (28)
Meh, dead dude was the only one to introduce violence. They're both stupid, but you start swinging for any reason you'd better expect to be smacked back.
19 likes@harrod19 without sound its hard to say. Imagine being in his position, coming out of a store and seeing some random dude shouting at your wife/kids. On top of that he didn't pull out any weapons himself and just like the police and everyone else said the guy was actually retreating the moment he recognised a gun was being drawn. At that moment the dude on the floor can't claim self defence as the presence of a gun had basically eliminated any threat without actually needing to be fired
53 likes@harrod19 it's beyond clear that he didn't need to shoot the gun because the moment he pulled it out the other guy distanced himself from him. He could've easily put an end to the situation (a situation he deliberately started), but chose to shoot him instead. It's also beyond clear that the armed dude was one of dem wannabe 'Murican heroes looking for an excuse to shoot someone because he stopped and parked illegaly in order to start a heated (and hostile) argument with a stranger over something that didn't concern him, and got the response he wanted when the other guy pushed him after being provoked when he yelled at his girlfriend. Anyone in their right mind would've come to the same conclusion: the use of deadly force was unjustified no matter how you look at it, and he escalated the whole thing because he deliberately wanted to. Also, he already had a record. Don't try to defend the undefendable.
32 likesIn fact, according to the evidence, if anyone had a reason to escalate the situation and whose actions might be justified, it was the black dude. He saw his girlfriend being yelled at by a stranger in a hostile manner and did what he felt was necessary to protect her. Many more people would buy this narrative over the other, basically because it seems to be true.
@Yasin Syed exactly, once the gun was brought out the conflict was basically ended. He could've gotten back in his car and drove away, there was no need to actually fire. The dude was definitely not engaging with him at that point. Of course that being said, he shouldn't have shoved him to the ground in the first place. They both overreacted but the push definitely wasn't going to kill someone, the bullet did.
23 likes@Yasin Syed If someone was yelling at my wife and kids I would yell at him, not shove him into the pavement.
7 likesThat doesn't mean Drejka was justified in killing him, of course, but the dead dude initiated the violence when it was previously not on the table.
If you want to imagine being in anyone's position, imagine being in Drejka's position, where you're arguing with an obtuse woman who has violated the law and essentially disrespected the disabled, which you consider yourself to be, greatly inconveniencing you all the while, and you are stricken to the pavement from behind without any warning or hints of violence. You get your gun out to face your assailant, and you see him move. You've just been thrown to the pavement; is he moving towards you or away from you? If he's moving towards you, do you have time to tell before he's upon you and swipes your gun from you?
In hindsight we can tell the dead guy was moving away from him, but if you've just been thrown to the ground unexpectedly when adrenaline is already high, and are responding to an attacker, movement is movement.
Again, I don't think Drejka was justified in a hindsight 20/20 scenario where everyone has a built in Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System and can slow down time to see what exactly the threat is while also distancing yourself emotionally from the engagement, but in regards to what went down I think it was tricky and unfortunate.
However, this tricky and unfortunate situation was entirely brought on by the dead dude, who initiated violence when it was not necessary, even emotionally. The natural response to shouting is to shout back, not to assault someone from behind.
harrod19 Getting shot is more than “a smack back”. Sure he shouldn’t have pushed him but if you hear loud yelling and come out to see a dude in your girls face you’re probably not thinking too straight. A push is not punishable by death.
14 likesI don’t think he would have walked free but his lawyer probably could have convinced people to go easy on him if were for the lies and calloused statements.
0 likesHe did destroy himself with the statement about he doesn’t need to shoot if he want coming forward.
1 likeharrod19 he didn’t “smash” anyone. He pushed the guy away who was being verbally aggressive towards his family. In no way does that justify the gun being fired. Maybe a fist fight? Maybe just drawing the gun? But to fire it directly at him was uncalled for
7 likesUncleBourbon Imagine typing multiple paragraphs of nonsensical, video game character tier speculation
2 likesIf you're immediate reaction to somebody calling you out for taking somebody's handicap spot is violence then you SHOULD be put down. You have no place in polite society
0 likes@SpydersByte So if I smack you in the face and then turn around and walk away you're just going to get in your car and drive away?
1 like@Green Anon no, but if you smacked me in the face and then I drew my gun and you backed off then I would consider the conflict ended and I would drive away. You kinda forgot the whole gun part eh?
7 likes@Green Anon or would you rather I killed you for smacking me?
0 likes@Yasin Syed Exact conversation I was looking for. The guy should have never pushed him on the ground. But does that justify shooting someone? I don't think so. Also like you said and its obvious, as soon as he pulled out his handgun the incident was immediately neutralized.
2 likes@Yasin Syed He was definitely looking for trouble and was wishing one day to use the "self defense" card
3 likes@SpydersByte "No, but"..."I would consider the conflict ended and I would drive away." Do you want to try again and get your story straight?
0 likes@Green Anon I missed the "and then turn around and walk away" part of your amazing example. Why exactly would you randomly smack someone and then walk away? How am I supposed to answer such a ridiculous question in the first place? I mean I wouldn't start chasing you to smack you back but I certainly would be shouting "what the fuck was that for"?! The conflict in the video wasn't just a random shove, there was a reason behind it and the dude obviously wasn't aiming to continue the fight or he would've been on him and kicking him immediately, not slowing to a stop and adjusting his pants like we see in the video. So I'm sure the "fight" could've stopped right there and it DEFINITELY could've stopped once the pistol was out and both the black dude and the white dude on the sidewalk take multiple steps away from it.
2 likesThis man was berating a woman for foolishness, he absolutely initiated the whole issue. Verbally abusing someone is a violent act. Furthermore he is a man doing this to a woman. Wtf - he had done this previously and pulled a gun on other people including a mother and children. He was looking for trouble, had that woman asserted herself a certain way he would have likely shot her.
4 likesHow does it work in America? 100.000 dollar and he got released after a month? How he get his hands on that amount?
0 likesmike h doubt that would’ve helped much. Other guy was actively looking to cause problems and would have found another excuse. Moreover, if it wasn’t this dad, it would’ve been someone else soon
3 likesYou talk about lives ruined and lost, but imagine a world where the first person to introduce violence into a non violent situation was shot and killed. EVery. Time.
2 likesThere would be many less lives lost and ruined once we cut out those weeds from society.
True that
0 likesLoralei Jessick imagine a world where people don't go around inciting violence just because they're bored off their asses
0 likesDogald Trump people aren’t saying he’s not responsible for his actions the black dude that is. We’re just saying you don’t murder people because you get pushed over that’s common sense
2 likesexactly none of them do.
0 likesDogald Trump I think the guy realizes he made a mistake in the heat of the moment, but that’s why this is a manslaughter charge. It’s why you shouldn’t look for confrontation without being trained in how to deal with it, because even if you’re innocent your life will be hell for a bit as you get cycled through the justice system.
0 likes@Scott Jackson he wasn't innocent, he was guilty. It is very clear. And at no stage does he ever show "realization that he made a mistake". He shows zero remorse. He has a record for threatening to shoot people.
1 likeThe lady’s face behind the defense attorney saying “One man is already gone, do we want to take another mans life away” is accurate. That attorney was ridiculous!
171 likesReplies (5)
The defense attorney calling him “the REAL victim” was even more ridiculous. I’m sure the jury responded realllly well to that. That defense attorney is just atrocious!
32 likesMeh, I don't know I thought he was doing ok. Hitting the patriotic notes, and yada yada. You never know, he might snag a sympathetic juror. Seriously though, there are worse defenses, the Twinkie defense for one. I think the real tragedy here is his tie.
7 likesHe had a really difficult case to defend. The video said it all, there was enough time to realize that the aggressor was backing off and not a threat anymore and there ain't no way you're gonna defend your way outta that.
10 likes@Zamerus People tend to forget that defense lawyers are required to defend their client regardless of how defensible the client is. An attorney's not an asshole for being on the "wrong side," there has to be a defense to test the merit of the prosecution's case. Sometimes there's no convincing argument to make, but you can't just pull an ...And Justice For All and proclaim your own client "should go right to fuckin' jail."
9 likesI thought that attorney was going to start crying at one point.
1 likeI cringed so hard I lost feeling in my neck.
This guy highlights the type of person we shouldn't let be a cop.
642 likesReplies (18)
Yeah, like michael dunn..
8 likesMannn imagine if he became a cop :(
4 likestoo bad, there's plenty of em
20 likesPeople like this often try to become cops and fail so they just go around acting like cops anyway.
19 likesto be fair either of these guys being cops would probably end up the same, the guy who was killed here was no angel
5 likesOliver Heaviside that doesn’t matter. He defended his wife. A logical thing to do.
5 likesKingstreet RC Sweden He's the victim!!!
0 likes@a nu start Assault ...yes. Aggressive... definitely not. The attack wasn't even sustained it lasted a fraction of a second. Cars are not bulletproof so you can't say she was safe in the car.
1 likeThis guy had a history of actively getting himself into confrontational situations and flashing his gun. The actions of a fragile mind.
A cop would have been exonerated. This man was in the right to defend himself. He should not have pulled the trigger but in that moment i feel hes still justified in his actions because you dont have years, months, weeks, days, hours, or even minutes to make heads or tails of whats going on. They railroaded this man
1 likeDancingOdie I actually don’t think he was railroaded. His response was disproportionate. He was the victim of a single push and there was no signal of anything further. No threats were made. Marquise wasn’t approaching him. So what exactly was he defending himself from?
2 likesToo bad we Don’t need em we got enough bad police around...
0 likes@a nu start
3 likesPlain wrong.
The video shows that the wife has stepped out of the car and is standing in front of Drejka at the moment her husband pushes him. I think he was prompted to push Drejka away from his wife because he felt Drejka was threatening his wife, it's clear that voices are raised. He didn't take a run and tackle Drejka, and he didn't punch Drejka. Do you think Drejka would've taken a step back if the husband had asked him nicely? I think the husband's actions were instinctive and the level of force proportionate. What happened afterwards was just 'revenge' from a scumbag who felt belittled and had had his 'authority' questioned. The husband was backing away when he pointed the gun. Cold-blooded murder.
Ah, yes, and the guy who pushed him highlights the type of person who doesn't know how NOT to escalate a situation
0 likesIf you fuckin' attack someone expect to get attacked in return, if its a gun, sucks for you
also really highlights why allowing everyone to have a gun is a really really bad idea
1 likeRob Lena I am no fan of obnoxiously loud music coming from cars, but did I miss something? Was loud music a factor here?
1 likeThomas Jefferson Wolfcall the woman was out of her car before the gun came out. Just FYI.
2 likes@Rat Terrier Dog Mom Nah, she was parked in a handicapped spot I think, and she isn't handicapped
0 likesidk I'm like 0:19 in and he seems cool
0 likesIt would be interesting to see an interrogation of an innocent person to see how they would react. Like if the interrogator isn't professional or correct in the readings of body language and behavior of the person.
91 likesReplies (5)
I believe there was actually one on this channel but it looks like it's been moved to the Patreon. Forgot the name of the guy but they essentially lied about evidence to get him to admit to it and he never cracked and was found not guilty.
12 likeshambo yeah the police talked about getting camera footage and the guy was like “Good, lets go see the camera footage”
10 likes@hambo Can you remember the name of the video?
0 likes@mongopoju
3 likesThere's two videos I know of that feature it but they're both Patreon only.
One is an interview of Michael Dixon, you can find the video link on their Patreon post "TMCPI (1-7)"
The video is called "Michael Dixon, Shayna Hubers, Thomas Chan"
The other is actually an anonymous sexual assault victim being sternly questioned by a detective who tries to get her to admit she is lying or embellishing details about the assault.
The video link is in their Patreon post called "The Most Compelling Police Interrogations Part 9"
@Madi Meyer Thanks dude I recently subbed since it is only 1 usd
2 likesI did a little digging about Drejka after watching this video again (great content, btw!). Turns out, one of those previous incidents that JCS mentioned was at the same location, over the same dumb parking space issue. Ricky Kelly, a truck driver, alleged that Drejka threatened Kelly's life with a firearm and used racial slurs during the altercation. The owner of the store came out and threatened to call the police if Drejka didn't cut the shit, Drejka allegedly replied "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After that interaction, Drejka made a complaint to the company that Kelly drove for. In the recorded call saying that Kelly was "lucky I didn't blow his head off."
212 likesDrejka has done this bullshit song and dance before, throwing around his weight like the big boy he thinks he is only emboldened by the presence of a deadly weapon, with zero regard for the damage he could cause using it. He knew exactly what he was doing.
Replies (11)
If true, that makes sense. He dreamed of this for years. I suspect he lived in a right-wing bubble where he believed cops held different standards for some than others, and that he would be treated as a hero by them for exercising his 2nd amendment rights. However, you can't go pick a fist-fight and then shoot a guy running away. But he does have SOMETHING in common with heroes... the superpower of 'super healing.' He was in such pain he couldn't talk at the start but within minutes he was 100% fine.
11 likesI've heard the term 'lead confidence' before, how certain people will act knowing they are armed and usually when they are sure another person isn't.
4 likesAll the video evidence supports this a man who is defending himself wouldn’t shoot a man backing up he even backed up almost to the point of turning around completely and he still shot the guy, this was something he wanted to do for a long time the man wants a problem with anyone and in jail he’ll get plenty but won’t have a gun to hide behind.
3 likesWow thanks for sharing. Good research friend! ✌
2 likesAnd now he got assaulted in jail and doesn’t have his weapon to save his ass lol. Coward doesn’t know what to do now that he doesn’t have his gun to save him lmao.
3 likesDrejka is probably salty he dropped out of mall cop basic training and spent his time fantasising about this.
0 likes@Jagrofes c m Xbox n CNN
0 likes@M Brown if he is living in a right wing bubble I would hate to see what ppl living in the left wing bubbles looks like
1 like@Ninja Shogun You don't want to live in any bubble. Right, Left, or otherwise. If you want to see what a Leftist bubble looks like, go search "Rose Twitter." If you want to see what a Right Wing bubble looks like, watch this disabled guy humble-brag to police about killing a man while using stilted gun-magazine tacticool lingo.
2 likes@Seth Hamm based on everything else people in the comments have added about his character. it really does makes sense, he had been looking for this opportunity to shoot someone. it took him 20 years to plan and try to find even the slightest of reason to pull out his firearm.
1 likeAgreed, this would have worked in the 50s and 60s.
0 likesIt's coming right for us!..
0 likesBOOM!
Guys clearly traumatised from his time in the service - guy killed a lot of trees in his time man, and was severely wounded in a bonsai attack which left him stumped for life. As a Sapper myself, I treely understand his plight.
1054 likesReplies (28)
🤣 stop it!! 🤣🤣
33 likes@Christine Barry stop your pineing! I live fir bad puns! Oakay though, I willowallow your request and give it a rest 😉
82 likes@rockstarJDP oakee dokie but I don’t want yew to leaf!!
40 likesThat was terrible 🤦♀️😆
13 likes@Christine Barry clearly your bark is worse than your bite. You need to root first and ask questions later (I'm seriously reaching now 😄)
45 likes@rockstarJDP well done 👏👏👏👏
9 likes@Christine Barry you were a worthy adversary. Good game 😉
16 likes"Sapper" fuck that got me good. Nice word play.
12 likesIf only all youtube comment chains were like this
12 likesHe can't even relax at his favourite Vietnamese restaurant anymore because he just hears them speaking tree 😔
20 likes@Scruffy Bones he should have just palmed them off really
6 likesEssayons
0 likesI wonder if he's twigged that his conduct is logged with a criminal record that will never leaf him no matter how hard he tries to branch out. It's in his best interest to get to the root of the problem. I hope his therapist takes trunk calls now that he's in custody as he's clearly barking mad.
10 likesI love this comment and all of the replies
4 likes@fourstar fuel I'd say you've if not topped at least equaled the OP. I salute you! lmao
4 likes@Sinister Minister 👍
0 likesShear genius
4 likes@Mike Thomas it leaves me thinking the same.
1 like@Mike Thomas it's a shame I was cut down in my prime
4 likesWell done sir
3 likes👏🤣
2 likes@rockstarJDP 🏆🏆🏆
1 likeFucking hilarious.
0 likesCobra Kai forever!
0 likesI don't get the context, explain 🙈
0 likes@silas frisenette he speaks and acts as though he's a military or police veteran, but his actual trade was as a tree surgeon so we're just ripping on him for acting like he knows what he's talking about 😅
0 likes@rockstarJDP I yes, I forgot he was a tree surgeon haha 😀
1 like@rockstarJDP it's just too bad he had to draw xylem. It saps me down to my roots that a stick in the mud like dumb-ass Douglas here can cause such pain.
0 likesWeeping willow
The fact that he said "thank you" to the officer after being informed he killed a man, a father, a husband in front of his family made me SCREAM. This man is absolutely vile.
46 likesReplies (2)
he said thank you because he legit though " officer is white like me .. what could happen" . and he thought " did y'all a solid "
4 likesTimestamp?
1 likeEdit: 35:58
Oh okay
0 likesNow I see it
Imagine if this "defund the police" movement actually gets some ground and there's an armed vigilante like this man on every street corner.
1 likeReplies (1)
We would all be dead dude acted like he got tackled n his poor elbow n wrist what a wimp and then said he was coming at him when the gun clearly made him back up. N the thing is if u wanna fuck someone up n u got to start off pushing like that u prob gonna charge immediately seemed like he just pushed the shit out of him but still a normal push not a running push even but just a push to say wtf u doing yelling at my wife not a im gonna fuck u up type of movements dude was backing up wtf manslaughter ?!??
0 likesThose closing arguments were terrible. Did he write them on the way in that morning?
0 likesSad thing is there are literally 4 free parking spots when he arrived, 3 of which arguably closer to the entrance than the handicapped spot.
1050 likesReplies (21)
I know. For real. This guy acting like the driver sped into the last available handicapped parking spot to beat out another car with an actual placard. And even if this was the case, him shooting the man as he was backing off was way overboard.
137 likesThe spot was easy to drive into and clearly shes still in the car. This dude was looking for trouble...
66 likesIt breaks my heart this happened to that poor family
32 likesIts also sad that the couple didnt respect that it was a handicap parking spot.
41 likes@nonni139 yeah I don't think you should get the death penalty for it tho
91 likes@nonni139 yeah i’m pretty sure most people in this comment section agree that it’s wrong to take handicap spots if you don’t have a sticker, but that doesn’t justify being shot to death for. don’t know why you even bother bringing that up.
87 likesSometimes handicap spots are not necessarily closest to the door, but closest to wheelchair accessibility.
15 likes@nonni139 the fact is this guy ONLY started anything because he had a gun and was ready to use it. His gun was his motivator, not the handicapped spot. I guarantee he wouldn’t have said anything to her had he not been hiding his gun. That’s what these guys do. They start trouble then when someone responds, they keep pushing until it gets physical. Then they can use their gun and claim “self defense”.
42 likes@nonni139 The reason all this happened was because a guy left his house, with his gun, looking for a reason to shoot someone.
25 likes@carlo Wallee she didn't die for parking in the handicap spot
3 likesI couldn't help but think both of these men are at fault for their lack of being able to control their emotions. The homie shoving a handicap man over for his confrontation about the spot. Then Micheal responding with shooting him dead. Both unable to control themselves.
9 likes@Mitchell Monroe I feel the victim is a little more justified as there were children in the car. I’m pretty sure race influenced both their actions, as a black man seeing a white man yelling at his family in a parking lot he thinks the worst… the shooter also was probably more scared because he is black.
6 likesWether your racist or not- your perception of a threat is naturally increased if said threat is coming from somebody of a different race. I believe studies have shown that this most apparent between black and white people, even if the threatened person is racist or not.
@Mitchell Monroe Dude who shot isn't handicapped. He's a he-karen. Should have minded his own business.
13 likes@sammygirl6910 probably should of went to a nicer gas station lol.
2 likes@nonni139 the reason it happened is because the shooter was a psycho.
9 likesthere were empty parking spaces on all sides of her. assuming a handicapped person drove up they could just park in the next one over no fuss. this dude was just looking for an excuse to get in a fight
5 likes@nonni139 Have you considered that they might have had the placard, just not put it out? You don't need to be wheelchair-bound to be handicapped..
3 likes@nonni139 agreed!!
0 likes@Jim Jo only because of this??? How did you read this bit of his mind? Must be a billionaire fortune teller your capable self....
0 likes@Nate McCollum I don't get the point of your comment. Regardless of if the victim acted out of racial motivation, if he "assumed the worst" clearly he assumed right.
0 likesAmerica scary
1 likeAmen
0 likesNot sure if you're aware but there is a fake 'JCS' YouTube account which seems to have some of your videos on it, the profile picture is of a cat.
1 likedude parks illegally to complain about someone parking illegally..
8274 likesReplies (61)
He's a karen
503 likes@A Gough but it’s true..?
18 likes@A Gough let me guess, you think it’s racism? Lmao
35 likes@Amy Mendez Privilege is an attitude not a colour.
121 likes@Daniel G literally not at all lmao they were parked there probably no more than 15 minutes, making a big fuss about this when no other disabled person needed the spot at that time is the definition of a Karen tho
52 likes@A Gough uh I never called u white tho? Also, how’d tf u know I’m hispanic
9 likes@Daniel G it’s only a problem when a disabled person needs the spot and the non-disabled person doesn’t leave from the spot. There were people waiting in the car so that seemingly means that they were only gonna stay there for a little bit & ready to leave.
28 likes@Daniel G you just used a reductio ad absurdum. Which even the narrator of this video said (in another video) that this kind of logic is used by guilty people. Not a good way of proving a point and makes you sound like the 5 year old
28 likesThis is the most American thing I've ever seen unfortunately
21 likes@A Gough 😆
0 likes@A Gough whats the MSM?
0 likes@Kim Berly what is this mess about do you know?
0 likes@A Gough Your racism is showing
8 likes@Amy Mendez A Gough has a good point.
6 likes@Daniel G bruh did you really copy paste the definition lmao
0 likes@Aussie Jules yeah I noticed it wasn’t the literal closest, but was the most convenient in terms of getting in and out—thanks for catching that & informing me about how that spot wasn’t even considered a proper handicap spot
1 like@A Gough Because names have race exclusivity....... ok, Karen.
1 likeThis comment should be pinned.
0 likes@Daniel G wow. They were BOTH parking illegally, regardless, this shouldn't turn into an argument. I wouldn't be yelling at a mother in front of her kids to move their car unless I was disabled and sincerely needed that spot, its called minding your business. The husband would have taken less than 5 minutes to buy the snacks and they would have left peacefully. No one should have gotten shot over this. Husband was defending his wife against her aggressor.
5 likeshongpingmike by his logic, you would end up with a never ending line of people shooting each other forever.
1 like@A Gough just because a bipoc is privelaged doesn’t mean white privelage still doesn’t affect them ..
2 likesKaren bundle includes: not only mental pain but physical
0 likes@A Gough MSM is not responsible for the term Karen, that was started by memes on the internet the news was just late like everything else
2 likes@A Gough you sound like michael drejka
0 likesHe parked illegally to murder someone for parking illegally*
4 likes@ng h No telling how many babies Karen's have aborted.🤣
0 likeswhy would someone care if someone parked illegaly thats so weird
0 likesOP ding ding ding
0 likes@Cpt Dinosaur Parking in a handicap spot shouldn't put your life in danger.
2 likesThat's how it goes down when a guy is Karen.
0 likes@Taryn Thomas A normal person wouldn't park in a handicap spot in the first place, a normal person would park somewhere else if pointed out she is parked in a handicap spot, a normal person than wouldn't start a dispute when she is in the wrong especially with her children in the car, a normal person doesn't start immediately with a physical confrontation, definitely with his children in a car, and a normal person obviously doesn't shoot someone when pushed on the ground in front of the victim kids. There is no innocent person in this situation. One person is just way more horrible than the other two
11 likesAnd then he chooses to take someone’s life
0 likesDoesnt matter it isnt his job to be policing dam parking spaces. What an azz..whole
1 like@Amy Mendez You look white
0 likes@mark still more cultured than all the white Americans combined
0 likes@Amy Mendez Wait are you talking about intelligence and education? Because that’s what “being cultured” means. If so, then white Americans are more cultured than most other races.
2 likesThe male Karen
0 likes@Amy Mendez Care to elaborate?
1 likehandicapped means something empty space that isn't a spot is damn near meaningless.
0 likesCop doubles the speed limit to catch the guy that's speeding.....
0 likesI don't see the point you're trying to make.
Like all Uk parking wardens 🤣
0 likes@Frank White I am always right because I’m intelligent & hot sf
0 likes@Amy Mendez wow! Racist much! Smh
2 likes@POETICWORLD cry about it
0 likesTHAT'S WHAT I WAS SCREAMING IN MY MIND THE WHOLE TIME
0 likes@Amy Mendez bruh your name screams Hispanic, latino at the very least.
2 likes@GothBoiClique someone’s triggered lmaoo
0 likes@Amy Mendez Hi, actual disabled person here (paraplegic), while I don’t think anyone should have been killed for parking in the handicapped spot, they shouldn’t have parked there if they were not disabled. It’s not a “I’ll only be here for a minute” spot, it’s a spot specifically for those with disabilities. I’m sure you’re aware of that. The spots are bigger to allow for wheelchair users to be able to get out of our cars. We have no way of knowing if there was a disabled person watching her in her car waiting for her to leave so they could park there in order to go into the store. Able bodied people can literally go anywhere, the whole parking lot is yours aside from a few spaces, we unfortunately don’t have that luxury because of curbs/bad terrain/distance and whatever else. Again, her guy shouldn’t have been shot over it, but she shouldn’t have parked there. You defending her parking there because she wasn’t going to be there for long is straight up ableism, and I encourage you to listen to more disabled people on the issue because it’s something we deal with everyday. It’s very frustrating when the one spot we can access isn’t accessible for us because an able bodied person decided to be lazy.
6 likes@Amy Mendez Side note: Hispanic and latinas girls 125% have access to “white privilege”
1 like@Amy Mendez Plus they got the extra cake privilege so stop it
0 likes@G O A T never said they didn’t—but doesn’t apply to non-Afro latinx folks it’s mixed Latinx folks
0 likesdude pushes a dude into the ground for arguing with his wife
1 like@Amy Mendez nicly sayd ❤️
0 likesTo shoot someone because ...
0 likes@Amy Mendez for what its worth I agree with you 100% that the response was totally disproportionate.
0 likesIt was lazy and selfish parking in the disabled bay - especially as there were other spaces. Someone in a wheelchair needs extra space to get out of the car - and they can't get out to knock on the window and ask the person to move. Annoying, but not the end of the world.
In no way whatsoever does it warrant a confrontation like that, and being murdered over it is sickening. I agree it wasn't malicious parking there, it was ignorant - and I should know, I'm paraplegic so I deal with this a lot. I manage just fine without shouting at people and definitely haven't shot anyone.
Dude is a coward but dude shouldn't have pushed him.
0 likesNo illegal parking in a private lot actually with exception to ADA rules.
0 likes@Amy Mendez um I know you're Hispanic based on your last name your profile picture and the previous comments you have left...all very easy info to acquire simply by simply checking your public profile.
0 likes@Paul Hamlyn lmaooooooo alrighty than
0 likes@Amy Mendez 15 minutes? More like 2 minutes.
0 likesI know
0 likesAmazes me how stupid his defense lawyer sounds...
0 likesHe's like one of those "town guys" that likes to police everyone.
1812 likesReplies (17)
literally what i thought
17 likesSame here, especially using the "my store" type of language then picking a fight with the woman when he isn't handicapped or have anyone handicapped in his car. Dude gets pushed over for fucking with his old lady, turns around and shoots dude in the chest without even saying "back up" or "stop or ill shoot" or anything, just sat up and pulled the trigger 🙄 poor guy was even waking away sideways away from him. Shit is overkill and sad because he's got a family too. Never should have gave that guy a weapon or a chance to use it.
89 likesI have a guy on my street in town who’s a towny. But he’s cool at least. Wears the same red shorts and T-shirt EVERYDAY! Straightens people garbage cans and sweeps the sidewalks and shit lol
19 likesNobody pushed him yet
5 likes@Mike we gotta get that son of a bitch
5 likes@WrathofButch 🤣🤣💀
1 like@Accuser_of_the_Brethren nah some people are just dangerous
1 like@Accuser_of_the_Brethren yeah, if he really felt threatened i feel like he could've shot his knee or foot at the very least. anywhere below the abdomen is survivable, so is above but its less likely, then again you dont really have time to think in that type of situation. Depends on perspective.
7 likes@Chronospa Bro, shooting in the legs is difficult, even more so when you're shooting relatively small targets, like knees and feet, as they're not as big as torso and are moving. Even if you shoot in the legs though, you can shatter bones, pieces of which can rupture the arteries in particular the big femoral artery and good luck recovering from that, you can pass away within minutes. If an ambulance took 90 mins in this video, if what I described above were to happen, the person wouldn't stand a chance. So, my point is, "anywhere below the abdomen is survivable" is not always true. And yes, the situation matters a lot. You simply don't have enough time to think in general, not that this applies to this case
7 likes@Dima-X – Gotoro Of course. I didnt mean to say its 100% survivable, but more than not i’d say. Various things could happen like you said, low chance but you could bleed out. And yes, the leg is way harder to hit b, even if he had missed i feel like it would be enough to get him away. Im not sure if he had any intent in killing or not though.
0 likesYes sometimes it's best to mind your business
4 likesBeautiful description of the classic wannabe cop 😂
4 likes@Chronospa i feel like he could have totally shot his knee or leg and still "neutralized the threat" or whatever he thought was happening. Nope, center mass, kill shot immediately without either of them saying a word. 20 years warranted.
2 likesmale karen, or in other words, kyle
0 likes@Accuser_of_the_Brethren Also, notice how he complains that "every day there's a car in the handicap spot "waiting for someone."' Like... maybe it's THEIR store too? Maybe they are there every day to shop, just like he is? But he never considers that, of course. Because he thinks that he's the protagonist & everyone else is a side character or antagonist, only acting in response to him.
3 likes@Elle That's it: only discharge the weapon if you're trying to kill the attacker. All this 'shoot in the hand/leg' is bollocks.
1 likeI remember this case. A lot of people under another video supportet the murderer.
2 likesThats insane
Wtf was drejka’s attorney saying?
1452 likes“The camera was low definition. Even the color was bad” as an argument like wtf?? Was it in reverse too?
Replies (18)
He didn't have anything else to argue on is my guess.
123 likeswhen you're doing an exam and you don't know the answer so you just write the very first bullshit that comes to mind
97 likesI think it's a pretty good defense when you don't have much else to go on - since they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, pointing out that the camera footage isn't super clear is a good thing to bring up. I mean like maybe he was pulling out a banana! We don't know! It was a good effort for a defense team that didn't really have much else to use for their defense. But then the "he's the real victim here! uwu" part just trashed their already not super great defense argument.
70 likes@Banjo Peppers thats how I felt watching it. No matter what, every arrow pointed to him. I hate it for both parties but he was in the wrong. In the heat of the moment who knows what he was seeing through his eyes. But the way the defense attorney talked really killed it. The other guy did an incredible job on proving why he was in the wrong though. I would hire him.
20 likes“your honor, if played backwards, the video will show that my client was victim to satanic brain washing.”
18 likesNo audio....😆
0 likes@Clifford Gill ???
1 like@Mettallica0
1 likeYeah the defence attorney could've brought that aspect up as well I guess, it's just as idiotic as everything else he said
???
0 likesDon't they know about ESRGAN ? Just saying haha
0 likes"And you're gonna see there are some wavey lines..."
1 like@Banjo Peppers thing is, even if the guy that was shot was a straight bar of 5 pixels and Michael was another, you would still clearly see the one bar moving away from the other. The definition of the camera is totally irrelevant, and in my opinion even bringing it up only further weakens their already pathetic defense
3 likesThe guy self incriminated himself several times during the interrogation. The lawyer's job was impossible
6 likesThe deceased man is lucky he isn't being charged wuth attempted murderer. Michael Drejka was lucky he had a gun in his hand and was able to use it to catch the impact of the bullet the man shot from his belly
0 likesDidn’t the guy that offd Floyd have a lawyer that said “space aliens invaded his mind” or something along those lines?
0 likesThe argument was weak, but I'm not sure what else he could have argued after his client said he was scared for his life and the video proved that the victim was retreating, other than casting doubt about the video itself. His tone of voice bugged me, though.. was the jury made up entirely of children?
1 like“Your honor... THIS was the camera being used in the facility!” pulls out potato
1 likeI think its pretty common actually for arguments used by the defending party to be petty or insignificant like that. Its just a little detail that seeds extra doubt in the prosecution's case. Ideally they would build a wall of little things like this to tilt the jury in their favor, but its pretty hard to do that here. Its a point. The jury probably isn't convinced, similar to you and I, but the man's job is to try and build a defense for his client.
0 likes"released for 25 days" imagine if he was black
0 likesReplies (1)
exactly. if these roles were switched he would be dead too
0 likesI can't believe the patience of these officers, that CCTV is a godsend.
209 likesReplies (1)
@Christa Hefley agreed 💯
0 likesNobody wins ego battles
2 likesI hate this attitude that he has that he is obligated to approach vehicles, circle them, take photos, and antagonize the passengers about being in a handicap parking spot. He pretends to be a cop and tries to use all of the same lingo to make himself sound intelligent, but in reality he is some guy with a gun looking for trouble and starting trouble where he wants to.
596 likesReplies (21)
He acts like he is knowledgeable about law enforcement but he said ALL the wrong shit.
31 likesexactly
0 likesAt the same time, parking in handicapped places is a shitty move and the response they offered when confronted is equally shitty. People should call out BS behavior like this, but not with guns.
20 likes@Kaylus While I definitely agree that it is shitty to park in handicapped spaces, that is really so far beyond the point. It’s like saying that we should all learn from Breonna Taylor not to date drug dealers. Like, sure, maybe that is good general life advise, but this is a murder, and the relevance of that fact is borderline tangential.
19 likes@Kaylus i don't think this was his first time doing this ... He said that he always carried a gun, all his life ... And the fact that he fired the gun after the guy backed up makes me think that he wanted to use his gun eventually, that in his head was something like "okay, this guy pushed me to the ground, i'm justified to shoot him " ... plus, i don't think that if the guy was white and the same thing happened , things would've gone the same way ... but hey, that's just my opinion.
15 likes@VeloxFelidae EXACTLY! People are having a hard time getting that people are mad because a guy died over parking in a handicap spot. No one is saying yeah it was ok for them to park there. No one is 100% innocent in this but the consequence is not equal dropping dead in front of your 5 year old child.
14 likesThat question when they said would you do the same thing if you had a gun switched my mind about the situation... but all n reality the dude made a violence offense ... I do think this guy was looking for trouble.
2 likesyup a lot of that out there these days
0 likeswhy is it his business anyways on who parks in handicap spots, he never mentions hes handicapped. thats between the person who needs that spot and the person whos parked in it
5 likesYes....he has pulled his gun on other people before. They mentioned it after the verdict.
3 likes@Kaylus Please, don't try to divert blame. Nobody ever denied that stealing handicapped parking spaces is wrong, but it is ignorant at best and outright malicious at worst to act like that is anywhere NEAR the plane of murder.
5 likes@tutorial: brush him Exactly. Parking in a handicapped parking lane is a bad thing to do but that doesn't justify murder.
1 likeWould you have wanted him to call the cops? For someone parking on the handicapped spot?
0 likesFavorite part was the detective indirectly telling him he would not have done it if he didn't have a gun lol
0 likes@brenna in reality its between the person parked there and law enforcement
0 likesI'm disabled and I really appreciate people who put idiots who park in the handicap spots in their place. Especially since there was clearly other free parking spots in this case.
1 likeI bet she won’t park illegally in a handicapped spot again.. lesson learned the hard way
2 likes@Kaylus No, no they shouldn't call out this behavior. They should anonymously report them and that's it. Anything else is crossing a line. Confrontation is entirely unnecessary in this situation.
1 like@Wes T looking at her profile picture she’s already in her 60s, this is how she’ll be forever, sadly
0 likeslol I rest my case 😂
0 likes@Adam Jensen science space creepy stuff LMAO 🤣 go away ADAM!!!
0 likesI don’t like lazy ass ppl who take handicap spots but even if that’s the case that’s no excuse to murder someone wtf
0 likesI CANNOT with this guy and his improvised arm sling.
1636 likesReplies (20)
Oddly enough, I've watched this one before. I'm now on my second watch through, and I realized how his "sling" evolved from him just holding his arm funny to using his shirt as a sling like that. It's interesting to see how he was trying his hardest to look like a victim in all this.
100 likesIt's so funny lmao
7 likesI'm wondering why did he need an arm sling? Arm sling is for either to reduce the blood flow to the forearm when there is a cut or stitch, or when an arm is dislocated in order to keep it back in place 😄
15 likes@Kendra Baird and then says "oh yeah don't worry about that"... smh.....
4 likesNot to mention he barely uses it
4 likesYoure hot Chelsea.
1 like@Kendra Baird Remembering he entered the room cuffed from behind..so could the handcuffs caused his injury or maybe the toilet lid in the restroom as thats when he began using his shirt as a sling, on his return..or maybe..
0 likes@Kendra Baird Remembering he entered the room cuffed from behind..so could the handcuffs caused his injury or maybe the toilet lid in the restroom as thats when he began using his shirt as a sling, on his return..or maybe..
0 likesDefinitely 🤦♂️
0 likesRight!?
0 likesHe’s not going to survive prison
2 likes😅🤣😂
0 likesI know I wish I didn't find it funny!!!🤷♀️
0 likesHe was special ops, don't you know? Survival techniques can come in really handy, especially when you're being interrogated for manslaughter
2 likesThe Black guy really did push him pretty Hard tho
0 likes@John Reynolds he did, but that's no reason to shoot a man in front of his family, a man that was walking away.
2 likesIt's also funny how the moment the officer leaves the room he stops acting.
1 like@Kendra Baird they where both at fault
0 likes@John Reynolds for verbally harassing his FEMALE partner in front of their children. If I was a man, I would’ve done the same exact thing to protect my woman and children.
0 likes@TRIPLE X he wouldn’t have had to defend his woman if a man wasn’t verbally harassing her in front of his children, so the shooter was in the wrong.
0 likesOmg that defense lawyer is so annoying!
0 likesMe on my 5th video: “DOES NO ONE UNDERSTAND HOW IMPORTANT LAWYERS ARE!!???”
3266 likesReplies (73)
These videos are astounding aren’t they! I would be Hellen Keller until a lawyer was present.
160 likes@David S well, i think the difference is, if youre smart enough to ask for a lawyer, you're also smart enough not to do horrible crimes.
446 likesI think he was so sure that he was justified in his actions, that it never crossed his mind that he could get into trouble.
107 likesKinda funny though isn't it? Like there's an entire field of experts who spend years if not decades studying and practicing law precisely for situations like this. They're such a fundamentally important profession in our country that 1) They can't even ask you any questions until they've told you that you have a right to a lawyer, and 2) THEY'LL FUCKING GIVE YOU ONE FOR FREE IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD IT. We go out of our way to show people how important lawyers are...
49 likesAnd yet time and time again these guilty people waive their right to a lawyer thinking they're actually smart, or cunning enough to save their own ass better than an ass-saving expert could lol 🤦♂️. This guy is what happens when you're so ignorant about a subject that you don't even realize that you're totally out of your depth. Let the experts work in their areas of expertise people. I promise you, you aren't qualified to do their job.
@Ella Walsh A police officers job is to make evidence stick to the suspect, whether that suspect is actually innocent they don't know.
25 likesAlways assume if you are arrested innocent or not that you are in a bad place and need to lawyer up and shut your mouth.
Hindsight That’s what smart people do, but obviously many people are delusional. They think they can outsmart the police.
6 likesI know, right? NEVER TALK TO POLICE- that is your lawyer's job, everything will come out in court.
10 likesSpaceMissile tell that to “Jeff” lol
10 likesHindsight exactly right. If only he would have kept his mouth shut there is no way he would have gotten 20 years.
3 likes@MetaL BraiN \m/Extreme Metal Enthusiast \m/
2 likesThat is an excellent point.
@EliasDanger Not true. There are many cops, judges and even lawyers themselves who commit horrible crimes like murder and rape. The serial killer with the highest body count in history is a doctor in the UK called Harold Shipman. He murdered at least 218 people. You have to be reasonably smart to be a doctor.
2 likesYeah this guy is clearly guilty but how can't anyone think of calling a lawyer first? Never talk to the police without a lawyer.
5 likesthe defense lawyer in this video helps put that in to perspective too. when you feel like a murderer, just have a lawyer prove you aren't!
2 likesJeff does.
5 likesI think most people's first reaction is "I want to get out of here ASAP, a lawyer is just going to make this drag on and on."
3 likesBut never say a word to law enforcement until you've spoken to a lawyer/solicitor no matter how long it takes or what you have or haven't done.
@George Taylor True. And the thing is, laws are constantly changing, being revised, etc., common people cannot keep up with the changes because they are not in the field dealing with them every day of their lives. Our justice system right now is so complicated, even lawyers have a tough time keeping up! You re right, let the lawyers do the job for you, you'll be glad you did. 🙄
2 likeshonestly a lawyer could get u out of alot of shit weather u are in the right or in the wrong
3 likesOkay, I agree, but this advice should NOT be impressed on the guilty criminals. Too many get off Scott free for horrible, horrible Crimes! With so many laws protecting the wrongdoers and the lenient punisment they hand out, now, that is a crime!!! Too many innocent victims go without justice being done them because lawyers defend them right and left. 🤔😐😤😒
2 likes@Jo Letty they are doing their job. over 90% take a plea deal in that their lawyer convinces them to just plead guilty. its on prosecutors to convince the jury in other cases. if they cant do that, they must go free. its not always perfect, in fact i would say the bigger problem is innocent people being convinced to plead guilty cuz they are afraid they will lose the case and get a harsher sentence.
7 likesmisplaced arrogance—it kills.
3 likesListening to his defense attorney rambling about the "wrong colors" and "standard definition" in the CCTV footage makes me want to disagree with you ;) :D
2 likes@Hostile At Heart you cant blame him for trying, you could only blame the jury for believing it or the prosecutor for not doing a good job of pointing out how ridiculous of an argument that is.
1 like@EliasDanger No use making a logical statement in response to a joke. :)
0 likesOccasionally they say at the end of the video they say "I think I need a lawyer". Cops are thinking dude you needed a lawyer an hour ago it's too late now.
1 like@EliasDanger And how much Eviljuice do you need to drink to become a murderer??
2 likes(My point is: Circumstances, individual psychological structures and socialisation can make literally everyone a killer.)
VinnieThePuuh individual psychological structures can result in a person doing evil things, knowing how evil those things are and enjoying them thus making that person evil. The psychological structures don’t force someone to commit evil acts. It’s their own evil choices. We aren’t just bags of meat that do what our paychological structures and circumstances dictate. If that was the case, our whole justice system is misguided. Punishment for crimes doesn’t make sense, as they are no ones fault.
1 like@Tom Britton probably right, but with proper education and advice most would realize a lawyer would prevent much interrogation from happening. a lawyer will provide the angle the police are taking before you can sabotage it intentionally or unintentionally. we are the first to look at the guy in NCIS who says, "i want my lawyer" as a guilty guy with everything to hide, rather than a man being snatched up by the legal system on circumstantial evidence.
1 likeBruh, I’m listening like “these dudes stupid” 😂🤣
0 likesIt is amazing what people will tell you if you just ask them, even after you tell them they can remain silent.
0 likesEveryone- go give “ Vinnie The Puuh “ a like for the best name on YouTube.
0 likesRight?!?!
0 likespeople don't ask for loyal cause they think it make them look guilty
0 likesor at LEAST not talking
0 likes@EliasDanger not true. Any true criminal knows to never talk to the cops.
1 likeThat's how I feel when watching First 48. Half of those cases would be cold if people would just shut the fuck up and ask for a lawyer.
0 likes@Ella Walsh and carry guns
0 likesAt the point in a police interrogation where you are laying on the floor explaining things, yeah, you should have a lawyer there for that!
0 likesSame here. I wish it was required to be taught in schools
0 likes@EliasDanger Sometimes a good person do a crime too, yes the bad people most likely who will do it
0 likesbut accidents happen or a person has a psychological problem or losing your temper and do a stupid act
B24 Liberator He didn’t care that he killed someone and he would have absolutely gotten time no matter what he said..the video of the murder said it all
0 likesFarhan Yousaf It’s truly pathetic when you think about it
0 likes@George Taylor I agree 100% but I can tell you that at least on smaller cases, it can be hard to resist when it's something like DUI or drug possession and you know they have you but the best advice is "make them work for it" meaning don't consent to FST's (in PA, YMMV), don't consent to car searches, don't consent to blood draws. the problem is, I know around here at least that if you cooperate and just give in to everything and give them all the evidence they need, they often let you go home/get picked up by someone and at 2am on a Friday evening (which could mean several days before you see a judge) that just seems like such a better option than making the cops work for it because if they do then they are almost always going to book you jnto jail and tack on every charge possible before. cooperating with an officer for small misdemeanor infractions does actually get you cut some slack with the cops sometimes with the charges. and then if you cant afford a private attorney, its a toss up if you're going to get a PD who is willing to go through all tje discovery and try to find loopholes to get evidence dismissed and if the cops did eberhthjng right, constitutionally, you dont get off and the cop and rhe prosecutor might be less lenient with your plea deal. its fucked up and not how the law is supposed to work but it haopens every day, all the time and its really easy to talk about standing up for your rights and can be much harder to do the right thjng in the actual moment.
0 likesnow, a murder charge or any felony really? or really any time they bring you into an interrogation room, i would hope that i have seen so many cases of false confessions and/or self incrimination that the only phrase out of my mouth would be "get me a lawyer now please" but I can see why and how people get themselves into these situations even though they were JUST reminded of their rights. my experience is just with roadside misdemeanor drug offense arrests. I csnt imagine how much more stressful these situations are, especially wirh seasoned detectives using the Reid method
No kidding
0 likesIf they did we wouldn't be hearing about them.
0 likesNever talk
0 likesWell it wouldn't be as interesting of an analysis of they asked for a lawyer straight up.
0 likesim glad these disgusting demons don't.
1 likebetter call saul
0 likesThe only time I was booked was because I plead the fifth when four other folks that I was with sang like birds... I was a college freshman busted by campus police for a super petty weed and simple paraphernalia possession charge (less than a g, and a $5 glass pipe found in a backpack within arms reach of my person’s inside the driver’s vehicle ((I was sitting in the seat directly behind the driver)).
2 likesThe four folks who gabbed got tickets, a proper court date, and released from the scene back to their dorms. Cop said that I gave him a hard time simply by stating that “I don’t speak to police”, and that he took me to jail that night on account of my disrespect, (aka not incriminating myself by pleading the 5th)...
Matter of fact, I was very respectful and did nothing but comply to his orders (other than when he was asking me any incriminating questions which were politely refused).
Needless to say, I spent 8 hours in an East Knox holding cell between some dude with face tattoos who got caught trafficking a shit-ton o’ cocaine from Atlanta up north and another kid about my age who got called in for beatin’ his lady. They were nice in a “oh I fucked up tonight” kinda way. The coke dude was little wide-eyed and the lady-beater was a charismatic sketchy lowlife, which was disturbing... I trusted neither, and for the eight hours I was with them, I was on edge... but for that moment they were both still nice to a fellow accused criminal.
After 8 hours, I was released on my on recognizance and had a court date which ended in a plea deal. No probation or anything crazy. Shit got expunged after a year. Never had been in trouble before and since then...
Oh and little fun tie bit, the cops started to make fun of me when they emptied my backpack at the station and found my choir book for men’s chorale. Fml.
They do not read your rights to you during basic questioning. However, they do for an interrogation.
0 likesCorrect me if I am wrong, but that is what I have gathered from the countless hours of crime videos that I have watched.😅
It was not something that I knew before and I doubt many others know it either.
(Besides us crime addicts.)🤣
I’m from this area I’d like to know why it took 19 minutes for EMS to get there
0 likesTrue but if you straight up shoot someone in the wrong on camera 📸 it's tough
2 likesyeah, INNOCENT people should get a lawyer. guilty people should confess.
0 likes@EliasDanger I can confirm there are no smart people in prison. Jesus, how could this nonsense comment attract 300 likes?
0 likesBaerchenization get rekt
0 likesI know right U would think ppl would have enough sense to exercise their 5th amendment privilege IMO why Casey Anthony walked herself out from facing the death penalty.
0 likes@EliasDanger We'll agree to disagree.Ur right she talked alot of BS but never did incriminate herself Argue this case w good attorneys Sad to say they got it right Chaney Mason's handiwork Jose didn't have the experience Just the hustle to get great legal minds behind him Everybody in the world knows she's quilty But the law worked for her Reasonable doubt. Personally I'd rather one walk than an innocent person be incarcerated
0 likesHarper Mac dude, she was covering up and lying for something and her car smelled like death and she led the detectives on wild goose chases...I think there was a bunch of other stuff too. It was obvious. I woulda convicted her easy
0 likes@EliasDanger I have to disagree. I know a lot of people from a lot of different walks, and I've seen very intelligent people do very stupid things. Smart people get desperate, and then they commit crimes because they feel they have no other option and sometimes they didn't. No one is going to help them, they have kids to feed, they are carrying the weight of the world. In this case and in many a stupid man did something stupid and spoke before thinking. Because that's what stupid people do. They're too dumb to fathom all of the potential consequences of what they are saying or doing.
0 likesJust don't assume all criminals are stupid is all 😊 I have never been arrested but I've watched a lot of good people do terrible things in my life and it just takes a little thought and empathy to realize why. We are all a few missed meals or a few losses away from being the people we judge.
jo mob it was just a harmless generalization. You still have to do something stupid to end up there, usually.
0 likesI smell racism
0 likesAvery Garner who brought up race? That means your just smelling yourself, stop projecting
0 likesEliasDanger lmao sorry i was trying to comment on the video in general not your reply
0 likesIt's people like him who have enough balls to think there's no way they could be proved wrong. Narcissistic, aggressive, chip on their shoulder people.
0 likesGUYS NO ONE WHOS BEEN UNDER ARREST WOULD MAKE THIS DUMB COMMENT. I swear its like you guys think they’re like, “ok love bug, lawyer will be here in ten. Here’s a crumpet while you wait.”
0 likesNow this guy had the right to leave. He’s an idiot. He should have left, if nothing else. Bc he wasn’t under arrest...
But generally speaking...
If you dont have a lawyer on retainer (WHO DOES? What are you tony Montana?) you have to wait and be transferred to county UNLESS you can get someone to send a paid lawyer over. LAWYERS DONT KNOW OR CARE ABOUT YOU. If you get arrested on Friday night, do you think theyre coming in on Saturday morning LOL? if you dont have someone to send them money, do you think they’re coming? NO. And the public defenders, again, are at county, at the courthouse... meaning you have to voluntarily wait to be transferred. When innocent, thats even harder, but when guilty its even harder bc you already fear staying in jail...
When youre under arrest, all you want to do is leave, and they fuck with you BIG TIME.
You guys are thinking of interrogation. If youre being interrogated, turn on your heel and leave and come back with a lawyer, but if youre under arrest, unless youre like a murderer and think you cn get off with a lawyer... no one waits for a lawyer. Like I’m staying in jail three days to wait for an interrogation for a minor possession charge or something? Never. You THINK you would do that bc youre calm in your bed. Talk to me after you’ve been strip searched and handcuffed to a bench for three hours. Anyone would crack before the lawyer got there. Also, not in this case, but 8/10 times when you get arrested youre drunk or high, people forget that too. I’m talking about small crimes people in this common section are more likely to be accused of.
This guy is so convinced the cops will take his side that hes falling for all the tricks they play on him. He didnt wait for a lawyer bc he thought he’d be home for supper. And thats what everyone thinks. It’s very hard to willingly stay in jail longer to wait for a lawyer, even if you’d likely end up there anyway....
All I’m saying is, if you’ve been under arrest.... you wouldnt say it. Not even if you HAD waited for a lawyer, bc you’d understand.
I've watched at least 5 hours in a row since the first click
0 likes@EliasDanger well not all the time...there are smart criminals unfortunately
0 likessinging like a canary, he thinks the cops are there to protect his rights 😹😹😹
0 likesHe would have gotten away with it for sure with a good attorney
0 likesI'm in law school and your comment made me feel important and happy 😊
0 likesGirl🤣🤣🤣 but I'm kinda happy though. Smh. Humans are ridiculous
0 likesThe problem, the lawyer would try and throw a smokescreen around a jury to protect a guy whom is clearly guilty.
0 likesIn my opinion, it’s a GREAT thing that criminals like this don’t immediately call for a lawyer. Go ahead and dig yourself into a worse situation so you can be justifiably arrested - you know?
0 likesGlad i don't live in the US
1 like“Paramedics arrived within 19 minutes”
1024 likesI’m sorry but that’s way too long. You’d be annoyed if they took that long with a broken leg let alone a bullet in the chest. Poor guy. No one deserves to go out like that.
Replies (65)
only so much they can do there’s so many people who call them daily, I’m currently working towards that profession to hopefully help reduce that problem
70 likesThey have to arrive a little later because they have to make sure the scene is clear and safe. Can't be too sure that whatever shooter wouldn't open fire on them
32 likesThere can be reasons for it. I was a 911 dispatcher for a few years, and my husband has been a paramedic since forever.. We’ve both worked for cities and rural communities, both have times where EMS can take a while to make scene. Either they did not have any available ambulances and had to request mutual aid, they could have been fairly rural, or could have been staging for scene safety. Our goal was to have EMS dispatched within 30 seconds of receiving a call, have EMS en-route within 1 minute from dispatch. It didn’t always happen that fast, but there are a few reasons why EMS may take 19 minutes to arrive on a scene and that’s why it’s important that you know basic skills like cpr and how to help stop bleeding, it could save someones life.
45 likes@Nex Wex 3 what?
20 likesEverything surrounding the incident took seconds...except for the paramedics arrival smh they killed him...he probably woulda been alive
7 likes@Mark Bötefür drax them sklounst
1 like@Heather D'Gallegos huh?
5 likesIt's unfortunate that anyone loses their life, but you really need to understand emergent medicine and the strains on it in today's environment. Patient location, Current location of emergent providers (enroute to another call or transporting a patient), dispatching time, asking another Municipality for back up etc.. it's overwhelming with so many baby boomers at the age they are and the shortages in funding for the municipal emergency providers to the point they subcontract the work to privatized ambulance companies to cut the costs on pension/health care/vehicle costs. The cure is instead of complaining, do something within your community to help ensure this doesn't happening to you or yours.
5 likesBTW, scene safety is a priority when there's a violent crime and the scene isn't secured(perpetrator isn't in custody, explosive devices haven't been located etc..), then the medics are not obligated to assist the patient since it's redundant to try to help someone when your own life could be jeopardized. I've had people in the worst neighborhoods throw empty glass bottles at the ambulance to get us to stop...
.then they'll try to either steal/car jack the onboard medications or the entire ambulance itself because their momentary emotional decision felt better than the rational long term repercussions.
where they supposed to bend the fabric of time and space to get there faster? lol
12 likes@Keila Myles as an EMT, your expectations for our ETA is ridiculous. We literally cannot teleport on scene, and we have to make sure the scene is secure before even setting foot on the premises. Especially when a firearm is involved.
8 likesDude our agencies don’t even like us going more than 10mph over the speed limit. How is that the medic’s fault? Plus the police typically have to give us the go-ahead to get on site when guns are involved. I’ve been shot at while staging for a SWAT team, and that day I learned my lesson about how far back I want to be before the scene is clear. Point is, there are protocols to keep us safe. Can’t do much for people if we’re dead.
10 likes@A J you are absolutely correct.
6 likesParamedics don't rush to a gun scene especially if the area is high crime. They wait for the potential retaliation to disperse.
3 likes@Matt D thank you 🙏🏻
1 likeenglish is not my first language so i umderstood 90 minutes instead of 19 and i thought that was a crazy amount of time, but now that i know that it was 19 minutes it is still a lot of time
1 like@sweet paulaina it really isn’t. If someone there kept pressure on the wound, depending on where he was shot, to keep him from bleeding out, it might’ve had a different outcome. 20 minutes to arrive on scene after a shooting is standard to make sure the area is safe for the medics and EMTs to enter. And you have to take into account traffic on the way there. So, say you’re held up 10 minutes from traffic, even with lights and sirens. Then you still have to make sure you’re not walking into something potentially dangerous. Our first priority is making sure we go home at the end of the day. I don’t care what people have to say about that, but we are not law enforcement.
5 likes@A J Well somethings gotta give...maybe I’m wrong for blaming y’all if y’all have to wait on police to give y’all the “go” but it is what it is...and 19 minutes seems like too long of a time regardless of whose to blame so forgive me not knowing protocol...it still sucks, I said what I said...but I know better now
2 likesWell u don’t know the whole story, there might be 100 cases going on
0 likesI have to be honest, I thought the video said "90 minutes" and I was like "90 MINUTES???" Now that I've read your comment, I can understand a little better. I'm extremely sorry for the guy, no doubt at all, but I don't think there was malicious intent with arriving 19 minutes later. The causes can be many, like the fact that they have few ambulances and/or operators, or the station was far from the place where it happened and there was a lot of traffic. I don't know, honestly. I pray for the poor man who died and for his family....
2 likes(Edit: I'm Italian, that's why I didn't understand the right thing at first. And my brother is a volunteer paramedic here in Italy, so I kinda know how it works arous here. So before people start blaming paramedics, they should ask themselves "do I donate to their associations so that they can have enough and adequate material to do their job? (If the the association is independent from the govt) and would i be willing to be a volunteer like them, doing this FOR FREE, putting my own life on the line?" Again, I'm not American and I don't know how it works over there, nor I know if your paramedics are volunteers like here in Italy, but if they are, AT LEAST show some respect for them. Show it even if they are paid. They're doing an important job AND trying to get their own skins home in the meanwhile. Try to be more understanding, they didn't get on the site 2 hours later.)
@Mark Bötefür Indem er diesen Kerl zeigte, benimmt er sich wie Douche und bezahlte diese Demütigung mit seinem Leben.
0 likes@GauntletTCF it’s very similar over here. There are some days where I’ll have a call 45 minutes away because that region is so backed up with calls. Some days it’s just a mess.
1 like@B Sheppard ahja genau. You can just tell me that in English cause that was just harder to understand 😂.
0 likesIm guessing you were trying to tell me that the black dude got what he deserved for pushing the guy?
@A J I totally get you. My town's paramedic association only has only 2 ambulances and they often have to operate in the nearby towns too because some towns don't have them at all, or they have even smaller associations with maybe even only one ambulance, and if more than 1 case happens, they are in trouble and need to call for backup from other places.
2 likesI once got crucified, THREE WHOLE DAYS later god brought me back from the dead, fyi, death SUCKS ASS. 19 minutes is far too long.
0 likesNex Wex 3 You wouldn’t protect your woman from a man confronting her while she sits in the car? My man would, no questions asked. He could see there was an altercation going on.
0 likes@Nex Wex 3 tf are you talking about?
0 likes19 minutes is pretty quick
0 likesI live in Clearwater (where this happened). People will legit ignore emergency vehicles and not move out of the way. I see it all the time. It’s heartbreaking.
0 likes@A J The hospital is like maybe 5 minutes away from that store. People do not give a crap about emergency vehicles here. They just ignore them and don’t move. It’s heartbreaking.
1 like@Alli In Wonder yeahhh I used to operate around I4 in central Florida and it was a nightmare.
0 likesWho calls 911 from a broken leg?
1 like@Legend says depends how bad the break is lol but I see your point.
1 likeAs soon as you go to violence as your first response? All bets are off. Sorry.
0 likeshere in Australia if a paramedic took that long the government would have an inquest or royal commission into it ...Just not acceptable.
1 like@Josh Gee right, so your government would have medics run in without law enforcement clearing the scene after shots are fired? You realize we’re not cops, right? Not allowed to be armed. Read the comments above, please.
1 like@Josh Gee our average response time is 7 minutes here. But it will always vary when a gun is involved.
1 like@TRIPLE X not exactly, just a bad medical service. Most aren’t very busy, and even when they are, most get places drastically faster.
0 likes@Matteo Collins was referring to city’s and i feel like your incorrect
0 likes@Matteo Collins most aren’t busy? What’re you talking about?
0 likes@Matteo Collins I’ve had shifts where I couldn’t get 10 minutes of sleep without a call.
0 likesRight because no one else in the city needed an ambulance, heavy traffic does slow things down, some people won't even move for one, maybe it was coming from cross town. I had my horse roll on me knocking me out, took a good 10 minutes for the ambulance to arrive and the hospital is a mere 15 minute walk. I see what you are implying and its disgusting.
2 likesThe whole thing could’ve been avoided if that bastard would’ve mind his own beeswax. That would’ve been a Karen in a female version.
1 likeScene has to be secured by law enforcement before ems will respond in, so that adds time to the response. Some rural areas do have lengthy response times, where I live in Alaska the outlying areas can take 30 minutes
0 likes@Nex Wex 3 believe what you want buddy.
0 likes@Keinlieb how in the world is a push comparable to literally firing a gun at someone with intent to hurt/kill?
1 likeThe difference is that the defendant went there looking for trouble. He started and intense argument with a woman who was minding her business, of course her partner is going to come out and tell the guy to get lost.
Saying "violence begets violence" in a situation like this is incredibly tone deaf.
@TRIPLE X lol how are you going to help reduce that problem
0 likes@Secret Unknown become a paramedic
0 likes@Nex Wex 3 wym?
0 likes@TRIPLE X I don’t think one person is going to make a difference but that’s awesome you want to do it
0 likes@A J I don’t doubt that, but every place I’ve lived departments have never been that busy, places are definitely different, but smaller town departments definitely aren’t an every 10 minutes department, or even every hour.
0 likesHave you had any experience with traffic in pinellas county, florida? It's a madhouse. People dont even bother to pull over for emergency vehicles most of the time, and they're forced to slowly weave in and out of traffic.
0 likes@Keila Myles the paramedics killed him?
1 likeJesus get your feet out of victim mentality.. it's pathetic
We are doing everything in our power to make it asap.
1 likeIn South Africa, our government issued ambulances take 3 hours.
0 likesI was involved in a hit and run broke my ankle and couldnt move, it was raining and I was on the side of the road wet, cold and in a lot pain. It took paramedics 3 hours to arrive, 19 minuets is extremely fast.
0 likes@Keila Myles He was shot in the heart according to the lawyer... not much you can do
0 likesIn the UK they arrive under 5 minutes normally
0 likesIt’s Florida, don’t expect too much.
0 likes@K3NZ1E this was the uk and no they never arrive in under 5 minuets what kind of fantasy world do you live in xD
0 likes@Nightcore Demon No, this took place in the US and every time I have ever called for an ambulance it has come around the five minute mark.
0 likes1. scene must be safe and cops have people specifically trained in EMS to go in with the team clearing the scene to start any immediate care. By the looks of the background and scene the area it happened in can be a very remote area. They try to keep emergency services within a few minutes of any given resident but when you have a small town in large (by area) states theres people that live 30+ minutes away from anything but trees and wild life so these little gas stations and mini marts open to be closer to them but not near the center of town where the emergency services are. Those two factors come into play. The you add traffic and weather
0 likesFacts
0 likes19 minutes is a joke
0 likesIn my country if you are shot, paramedic dont even show up unless you call them 100 times with 10 phones
0 likesThe american health care system is not dissimilar to a third world or developing nation.
0 likescop gave him countless chances to say "i felt my life was in danger"
582 likesReplies (19)
🤣 true
5 likesOmg it’s painful 😂🤦♀️the cop asks him the same question like 10 diff ways, only thing left for him to say was “ OK we will do this multiple choice - did you A- feel your life was in danger B- afraid you were gonna die or C- both ?? 😂
41 likesMichael Dunn could've coached him up beforehand.
7 likesCan we all agree that if the man wasn't black this 99% would't have happened? He said he is not racist, but in that moment he was 100% . Mabye not actively racist but in that moment damn sure the thought " he is black so he wants to kill me" .
32 likesyeah, I think their trying to squeeze him to tell them that he only did that bec of self defense 😂
2 likesLol in 34:02 he literally hint him to say that he felt in danger
2 likes@Amber’s ALERTTS option D: I wanted to use my toy that I got
2 likesHe never outgrew the "cap gun, bang I got you phase" or something.
0 likesA life time of south park has taught me you can shoot something if you shout. " it's comming right for me!"
2 likes@Nyx Not so sure. Did he say "He is black so he wants to kill me."? It came up in investigations that he was involved in four previous incidents of aggression. What were the racial types of the others involved in those? The way I see it, he didn't have to say anything about the car being parked in the Handicapped zone. The deceased victim didn't have to shove him to the ground and Drejka didn't have to shoot his gun. At each point of the whole episode, the two men escalated to unnecessary levels and the actual issue was left far behind. Drejka was absolutely wrong in shooting him. It was not necessary at all and his conviction, based on past incidents and the testimony and footage of this one, is justified.
4 likes@Nyx Why should we all agree on something with no evidence to suggest it is true? Why are you so eager to make this a race issue?
0 likes@Jdb i am not ...but in my country people with dark skin are always perceived as "more dangerous and unpredictable" and i really hate that. Racism feels pretty illegal there in america but here is "acceptable", it should be but well... And i do see white people always throwing blame on the dark ones
1 likeHe said that he thought they beat him to "a pulp". 1 hit or kick can kill a person.
0 likes@Nyx But you have to stick to the facts of a case. Yes, you have seen/witnessed/been a victim of racial prejudice in your own country, but there is no evidence that the above clip contained anything provoked by racial prejudice. If you are going to claim that about the white guy, the same useless surmising could be made about the black guy.
0 likes@Nyx If the guy wasn't black he probably wouldn't have shoved the dude.
1 likeBlack guys have aggression issues. Imagine if that dead idiot was an Asian guy - he would probably have parked in the right spot thus avoiding the whole issue. And even if he did park in the wrong spot an Asian dude surely wouldn't shove the guy down.
Black guy, though? Yup - lawbreaking and physical aggression. "HE ONLY SHOT HIM CAUSE HE'S BLACK!"
🙄🙄🙄
@Larry Chunk somehow i hope that you are trolling my comment and not actually have the adaucity to say that intentionally
0 likes@Nyx Does the logic used in my comment look like a troll?
0 likesYou know deep down what I said matches reality. You just hate admitting to yourself that the real world doesn't match what you wish the world was.
Frankly, I find YOUR comment to be the audacious one as it insults victims of REAL racism AND insults non-Black people.
@Nyx Another racism mind reader. You would think psychics to be rare. But here we are.
0 likes@Nyx I agree with you.
1 likeAmazing how quickly his arm healed during the interrogation. It’s miraculous
164 likesReplies (7)
I laughed when he walk in using his shirt as a sling but next thing you know it’s was good as new 🙄
12 likesIdk why more people aren’t talking about it lmao, ironic how he claims that his arm hurts, wonder how the guy he shot felt
10 likes@Booch I heard gun shots are not painful. Death isn’t always painful.
0 likes@SeEpiN That makes sense, I would assume it’s because of the adrenaline
0 likesLol I was looking for this comment! He makes a point of letting the detectives know his arm is hurt. They leave for so long he sets it on the table like nothing but when They come in catch him off guard and starts faking it again
1 like@SeEpiN ur joking right? You think having a hole in ur chest or worse stomach isn't painful. U should search up getting shot in the belly button, one of the most painful things one can experience. Also it doesn't feel nice feeling ur organs slowly failing and the bleeding out.
2 likesWolverine healing
1 likeWho I their right mind would be willing to go to prison over people parking in a handicap spot ? This is totally insane !
121 likesReplies (10)
Seemed to me like he wanted an opportunity to kill with less risk of imprisonment.
17 likesI think it has more to do with the guy just pushing him to the floor
6 likesSwissJoker Hi from what I understand , this Guy lived in his neighborhood and would on a consistent basis Would Hassled people on a daily basis about parking in the handicap spot , even the owner of store was aware of what he was doing. He knew there was a chance of confrontation when he would approach these people without a handicap emblem...
4 likesThat’s not what it was about lol it started as that, but then it escalated to a physical altercation; which is what the shooting was about. Obviously lol
5 likesTyler Grant He was looking for troubled
0 likesHoward Manley Indeed but I dont think that justified the guy just shoving him to the floor.... Thats why this is even a close case and self defense is a viable defense strategy
3 likesHoward Manley well I don’t believe he approached her looking to shoot somebody. I think he was trying to play cop in a situation that was that big of a deal to begin with. I know people like him. My brother used to be like him. We worked at Burger King together and everyone hated him because he would try to tell everyone how to do their job and stuff. He wasn’t a manager. He was in no position to beaming demands of the employees. This guy is similar. He believes he’s morally superior, so he feels that it’s necessary for him to address when people are breaking the law. It’s not his job, he’s not helping the cops out, he just does it. I agree that he was aware that it could cause a confrontation. But he wasn’t afraid because he had his gun on him. I think he should have been charged with 2nd degree murder instead of manslaughter, but I definitely don’t think he did it simply to cause a scene or start an altercation. He did it because he had an authority complex like he’s morally superior to everyone else. Like it’s his job to make sure people are following the law. It’s equally dumb of him, but I don’t think he was looking for trouble. He would have felt perfectly happy and accomplished if she said, “I’m sorry, I’ll em my vehicle as soon as my husband gets back with the keys.” I didn’t think he would have continued to push the issue.
4 likesTyler Grant vThanks Tyler ur explanation makes sense in some kind of odd way, I personally don’t have that kind of personality so it’s hard for me to relate. I do know the store owner told him time and time again not to do what he was doing, however I guess he couldn’t help himself like you said it was just his style do you want to tell people how to act. I think ur talking points was right on tho. Be blessed ...Howie <><
2 likes@SwissJoker Yes indeed. The significant delay in point and shoot is what would have made me vote guilty... I didn't notice the decedent retreating at first presentation.. So I believe the defendant thinking that wasn't happening. I think manslaughter was an appropriate charge... I think asking for the max sentence was over the top... mitigating circumstance of having been violently assaulted without warning should be taken into account.
0 likes@Tyler Grant Is someone in his family handicapped? I'm curious if there was some other personal motivation. But yeah as you say he may just be one of those busy bodies.
0 likes"I've never been in that situation before"
469 likesWhen I was a kid I liked reading science books. One time I read a book about snakes and it said baby snakes were actually the most dangerous. Baby snakes don't have the skill or control of their venom glands that an adult has. As a result a young snake might inject you with all their venom in a single bite rather than giving a small dose. That's what this guy is. An inexperienced baby.
Replies (22)
Mate that's actually a brilliant analogy I'll definitely remember that.
42 likesThats a nice analigy
3 likesI hear that notion of baby snakes is false or at least unreliable.
20 likesOn topic though, I think this was a bit different. I think this guy was itching to use his gun.
Evidenced by how he had previously aimed it at 4 other people in traffic related incidents.
You mean to say to us that Youtube vids arent legit experience??
1 likeBaby snake actually do have control of their venom release. The reason they tend to inject all their venom is because they don't have the body mass, speed or stamina of adults during confrontation (whether hunting or defending themself) so they make sure that their bite is lethal as quickly as possible.
11 likesI just learned something about snakes under a video about an unjustified shooting lol
6 likesWow. Excellent.. this is why more kids need to READ. You develop badass analogies....
4 likesYou placed that analogy so perfectly! 👌
It was self defense if he didn’t pull the gun out he would’ve got beaten
0 likesthe victim was a baby too. he ran right out of the store and immediately jumped the guy. drejka wasnt even being physically threatening.
1 likeI disagree. I believe if he would not have shot that man, that man would have beat him senseless...
1 likeWrecked.
0 likesBAAAAABYYY Snake doo,doo...doodoo..doo,doo !
3 likes@Liberty Prime He and Dunn both had an itch
0 likes@Dudeno. That's not the case. After he showed the gun the black guy was trying to get away. Just watch the footage again.
2 likesMaybe you are right and the black guy would have beaten him up if he had not pulled out the gun. I give you that. But there was NO need to shoot the weapon at a person that is clearly retreating.
Honestly I’ve been in a situation where while at a indoor play area I saw my 2yr old daughter was being pinned against the wall and being yelled at by a much older boy probably 9yrs old. I can’t explain it or really remember but all I know is I must of run across the area and shoved the boy down. I don’t even remember running or anything I just remember coming out of a fog and after seeing my baby was okay realizing I just pushed a kid down. He wasn’t hurt and thankfully no one saw lol but I was in shock that I did that. I learned that day what momma bear means. I think that might be what this man experienced when he walked out of the store and saw a man yelling at his wife with his child in the car.
3 likesI agree with the other commenters great analogy and quite thought provoking
1 likeLove this
0 likesGutted
0 likesThis is so well said.
0 likes@Ana R if he was concerned about his kids safety he wouldnt start a fight in front of them especially in a gun friendly state like florida. he technically threw the first punch. he was being a thug. he even hesitated before he pushed him. quite different than your incident. he didnt deserve to get shot though
0 likesWhat a beautiful analogy :)
0 likes@Virgil that analogy still works for this baby
0 likesClearly murder.
1 likeReplies (2)
Self defense*
0 likesYup, definitely murder
0 likesHe's like that kid in primary school who always faked injuries to make it seem like nothing was his fault or justifiable or they just wanted pity.
293 likesReplies (2)
i was that kid 😭
0 likes@Beth McNeilly Beth?? Remember me??
0 likesYou should never be this nonchalant after shooting someone. Even if it was justified which this clearly wasn't lol.
222 likesI feel like I would be getting over the trauma for years.
Replies (7)
@Antonio man lol maybe, still open carrying requires a lot of restraint. I think most people after shooting someone even if they were attacked, if they are a civilian and not use to kill or be killed of say war. Killing someone would affect them you know.
23 likesThere’s a whole thread on Reddit of people who have killed someone legally, a lot of them have admitted their own shame in feeling nothing at all afterwards, so it’s not necessarily an admission of being guilt to be this nonchalant. Having said that though this guy is guilty, the other dude didn’t advance once the weapon was drawn and he made no attempt to tell him to back off, he just fired.
0 likes@Antonio man Look where being 'hard' got this dude. The dude so 'hard' he had never got in a fight and only had the balls to confront people because of his gun.
5 likesHow brave.
Nobody should be expected to feel traumatized after shooting an aggressive animal that physically attacks you without provocation. I would have felt proud of being able to protect myself.
0 likesPerplexer1 i genuinely can’t tell if you’re joking or not .... if you aren’t YIKES
2 likesYes, show some empathy for another human being, especially when the man had his family with him. Terrible thing to do and an awful waste, for parking in a handicap space!!!???
1 like@Derk you can say the same thing about the guy trying to yell at a woman with a kid not considering she may have a big husband coming around the corner. he picked the wrong woman to try to scare and feel manly about it
1 likeI love how his right arm stops "hurting" when he forgets to pretend it hurts. Then he remembers and goes back into the act.
555 likesReplies (5)
The detective kept grabbing his arm where he said it was hurting. The detective was intentionally grabbing him, Which would have made it hurt. Prompting him to tell the detective to stop grabbing his arm.
26 likesFeigning sympathy while grabbing his hurt arm to cause pain, is often a technique of psychopaths and cops.
1:44:41 exactly !
2 likesChris - I KNOW, RIGHT?
0 likesRoss Smith victim?
0 likes@xXi-MexicaN-iXx Would you mind telling me what leads you to believe that racism was a motivating factor in this crime? Honest question.
0 likesHe basically said because he always carries a gun, he had the safe feeling that he could confront people in this way. So hes basically prepared to shoot someone at any time if he perceives a threat, whether logical or not.
283 likesReplies (4)
Yup pretty stupid but you'd ne surprised how many ppl have this mindset
20 likesYes, he instigated a confrontation and then immediately resorted to shooting the first person who pushed him.
20 likesAnd it's the exact other way around. If you're carrying a gun (which I encourage), you're now responsible for the gun you carry, and whatever comes out of it, always. You should always try to de-escalate, but if you're armed, you have a double duty to not get into stupid arguments, and de-escalate situations. Just as you have a duty to not drink, for example (while carrying the gun, if you're gonna go out drinking, leave the car and the gun at home). It's also your duty to protect your gun, if somebody takes your gun from you, be it a kid because you left it unprotected, or a criminal. You're responsible for keeping it secure.
4 likesA gun brings new responsibilities. This guy, instead of responsibilities, thought "I can do whatever I want, because I have a gun".
Did he have pepper spray on him? You don't want the only defense tool you have to be a deadly weapon with nothing in between. Had the guy backing up still been a threat in his mind then mace him and thats that. Even if you were deemed to not be in the danger you thought those kids still have their Dad and you're facing prob at most simple assault and likely no charges as dude did push him. Have some mace in addition if you choose to carry a firearm. Would have saved multiple lives including the kids and the moms who don't have their Dad now. Lose lose lose all the way through.
0 likesEgo bull shit. Ego, ego, ego.
0 likesThe detectives gave him every chance to say he felt his life was in danger. This kind of situation scares the $hit out of me! My man would have done the same thing if he came out of the store and saw some guy in my face. This guy only felt brave enough to provoke this situation because he carried a gun. He is not the victim. He is a coward! My opinion!
244 likesReplies (17)
Amen
6 likes100%!
6 likesHahaha use your man like that. You married to him?
0 likesGet a pitbull ladies, they make better attack dogs than boyfriends....
0 likes@hm rq did you watch the video? the shooter had 4 previous encounters where he pulled guns out on people for ridiculous reasons.
12 likes@hm rq i don't think you watched the video in full big lad
5 likes@Jim Bob Pitbulls are one of the most sweetest breeds I've ever known of. 😍
2 likesSHE"S SAYING HER BOYFRIEND WOULD HAVE DONE WHAT MARKIES DID, WHICH WAS ABSOLUTELY THE WRONG THING. HAD HE NOT GOT KILLED HE'D HAVE BEEN GUILTY OF ASSAULT. DREDJA NEVER RAISED A HAND TO HIM WHEN MARKEIS SHOVED HIM DOWN. BEING AN ASSHOLE ISNT GROUNDS FOR ASSAULT. HIS WIFE ALSO SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN THE CAR, SHE"S ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR ESCALTING THE SITUATION - ALTHO DREDJKA STILL HAD NO RIGHT TO SHOOT HIM... HE COULD HAVE JUST GOT A PLATE AND CALLED THE COPS... OR IF MARKEIS CAME AT HIM, BACKED MARKEIS OFF WITH THE GUN WITHOUT KILLING HIM. NOW HAD DJEDKA BEEN HANDICAPPED, AND MARKEIS CAME AT HIM AGAIN, HE LIKELY WOULD HAVE HAD GROUNDS... OR HAD HE CLAIMED HE WAS IN FEAR FOR HIS LIFE HE"D HAVE HAD A BETTER CASE, BUT YA CANT BRING A GUN TO A FIST FIGHT WHEN YOU'RE PHYSICALLY CAPABLE. THESE STAND YOU GROUND LAWS ARE CRAZY< PEOPLE THINK THEY CAN JUST SHOOT SOMEONE WITHOUT MEETING THE CRITERIA.
2 likes👌🏻
0 likes@Brett Allen maybe start typing like a sane person if you want to have your thoughts read by others?
2 likesThe definition of a coward .
1 like@jimbo Meadows So if someone is threatening your wife, husband, SO, whatever, your just gonna stand there and let it happen?
1 like@jimbo Meadows also if your gonna shoot someone for pushing you, then you needa go back to 2nd grade
1 likeAnd all he had to say one time was he felt fear for his life .. i felt they basically was trying to give him multiple outs !! Smh
0 likesYou don't get to tackle someone just because they are yelling at your wife. Of course he shouldn't have been killed for it and it's good they found Michael guilty. But if you think getting physical with someone because they are trash talking is OK then I'm sorry you weren't raised right.
0 likesExactly. Fools like him are emboldened by carrying a gun, and have a chip on their shoulder, just daring someone to knock it off, so they have an excuse to shoot. It had nothing to do with self-defense. He was the aggressor.
1 like@David I never said that the boyfriend was right for charging at Michael, although I wouldn't blame him for doing so because Michael shouldn't be instigating people in the first place. I was simply saying that the one post was pointing that the boyfriend was deserving of what he got (which he absolutely did not). If saying that triggered you then you probably should get some help as you may likely be one of Michael's kind and end up shooting someone unnecessarily and unlawfully.
0 likesThis dude will always believe what he did was justified, even as he sits in prison. I bet he learned nothing.
153 likesReplies (5)
Na in prison you have a lot of Time to think. Im sure he analyzed what happened from everyone’s perspective
4 likesThey parked illegally. He confronted them about it, which was probably a bit much, but understandable. Victim walks out and pushes him hard, which was a big overreaction. He pulls out his gun and shoots which is indefensible.
10 likes@Youssef Elhenawy I don't believe he did. The dude is sick. He seems to not care at all. Even in prison he's probably still saying that he's in there for no reason. Some BS like that
2 likes@Sebastian Thorsen Keeping in mind that he himself parked illegally.
3 likes@J K Why you gotta bring race into this? Maybe he had a family member who's disabled and is tired of people taking the parking spot? Maybe he works for a parking firm and deals with this often, etc. etc. Could be a thousand reasons. You really can't break a law and complain that it's enforced or that people complain about it when you do.
0 likesNear as I can tell, this guy was carrying a gun for the sole purpose of someday getting the chance to shoot someone.
2712 likesReplies (48)
There are too many in the world with this mindset.
139 likesExactly how I felt
7 likes@NLR 1996 Why are you so scared dude? Please seek help before you hurt someone.
73 likesNLR 1996 so you’re defending this guy huh? Lol
11 likesReally though?
0 likes@Yes exactly
0 likesNLR 1996 thank god I’m not American!
5 likesThe thing with carrying a weapon is, that it's not always a security measure but just dialing up the degree of violence. If a criminal knows that victims might carry a gun, they're more likely to take one as well. If guns are involved, they're more likely to get used. And you probably won't get to pull a weapon if a criminal has a gun themselves. Unless you have some time to prepare for an attack.
12 likesGUYS!! I'm pro gun, including concealed carry. And secondly I have been attacked and nearly killed, from behind and if I was carrying a gun he would have killed me with it he actually got exhausted trying to crack my head open with his Nikes and gave up. I'm just saying THIS INDIVIDUAL rings true to me as a guy just waiting to kill someone. That's all.
12 likesWhy the fuck else would you? Lol
0 likes@1onefix1 when someone is on a video like this defending the shooter, yes you should shame them.
3 likesNo one said all gun owners, no one said any generalizations, but this guy mustered up a whole braindead rant that isn't even related to the situation.
@Trouble_Always_Inbound Seriously. And he had 4 prior incidents of drawing his gun on other people - how did he still have a license?
6 likes@Reb el If you carry a gun and people know it you are much less likely to be robbed because its just too dangerous for the criminals
1 likeSee “Michael Dunn” < another example of this kind of person.
3 likesAs most gun nuts do.
0 likesLong Bong Bro not everyone lives in the suburbs like you. People get their homes broken into a lot.
2 likesAnd finally he gets what he wished for! YAY!
1 likeNow he has 20 years to celebrite his accomplishment. In prison.
@A Blank Slate
2 likesMost aren't actively looking for it, though.
He shot the right one! LMAO
0 likesI think it was to defend himself but he overeacted
1 likeWhat do you Americans call it... wannabe hall monitors?
2 likesA lot of comments here are basically the comments that the rest of the world will never agree with. The "America needs more guns" mindset is utterly baffling.
3 likesEXACTLY
0 likesFacts
0 likes@WalknTalknStevnHawkn best reply here
0 likesPlenty of people like this with itchy trigger fingers who think they're justified simply because they have it.
1 like@Reb el Do you have any basis for this? From what I know with researchers interviewing prisoners, criminals in general will avoid potential victims if they think they may be carrying a weapon.
0 likesIf what he said in the interrogation was true then he's been conceal carrying for 26 years and apparently has gotten into some kind of traffic altercations with 4 people before this incident. If he was really looking to use the gun trying to be a hero he sure waited a long time to do it.
1 likeI mean, that's why most people carry technically
2 likesremember guns dont kill people... it is the unicorn flying over the pink clouds
0 likesHe was soooo proud to kill himself a black man. So obvious
2 likes@Long Bong He has a point though, you cannot under any circumstances count on the Police to show up, protect you and save the day. It just doesn't happen, it takes minutes at best for the Police to arrive when seconds of your life are at stake.
0 likes@Tall Dwarf but someone did die neccesarily wouldn't you agree?
0 likesJohn Costa definitely he could have just whipped his gun out as a threat but he had to shoot straight away even though the other guy had no weapon.
0 likesYou mean like every gun owner in America?
1 likeHere's a comforting thought...we have hundreds of cops with the same attitude. Giving people like this a firearm is like giving a 6 year a brand new bicycle and telling them they can't ride it.
0 likes@CrunchyWolf that logic is extremely flawed
1 like@Long Bong Ok, and statistically it's unlikely for my house to burn down considering what I cook and how much I cook. Does that mean I shouldn't have a fire extinguisher? The point of having it is to remove the worry. Especially for people in bad neighborhoods where those types of things ARE a common occurrence.
1 likeWhich, according to the actual statistics from the US Department of Justice, there are about 1 million burglaries every year where a member of the household is present. There are 128 million households in the US. So just base numbers here... there's a 1 in 128 chance your house will be robbed while you're home, which isn't exactly a safe situation to be in.
@Long Bong I'm going to repeat what you said. Reading comprehension. I didn't mention gun control. I'm only talking about that preparing for a technically unlikely but still very possible situation, is perfectly fine. You sound like a complete fudd. People aren't constantly worried, it's just they prepare. Not that hard to understand. And it's not as unlikely and you're making it out to be. The statistics show that.
1 like@Borkborknomnom 9000 0.78125%. That's a 0.78125% chance with your own cherry picked statistic. Sounds like i'm hitting close to home for you. I'm sorry you're scared all the time dude, maybe try less Fox news?
0 likes@Long Bong That's a .78% chance, in a year. This isn't a cherry picked statistic. One of the main reasons people own firearms for home defense. Home invasions are incredibly common. And self defense uses of firearms is fairly common too. According to a CDC study done during the Obama administration, the lowest estimate was 60-150 thousand self defense uses a year.
1 likeIf we're going to use your argument, well why lock our doors? Why teach our kids not to follow strangers? Why wear seat belts? Follow the rules of the road and the chance you'll be injured or worse in an accident isn't really much higher. Wearing a seat belt doesn't make someone scared. It's just called being prepared for a possible reality. Now, if the subject was preppers with hundreds of guns and hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammo, you'd have a point. But we aren't talking about those people, we're talking about the average gun owner who owns a gun for self defense. And even if some people do own guns because they're scared something might happen to them or their family, so what? If I lived in the worst block in Flint Michigan, and there are gunshots just about every night right outside my door, I'd be scared for my family. I pity you if you wouldn't feel the same.
He covered his ASP!
0 likesI don’t think so. I think he thought it was a good idea, but he was weak and afraid when a confrontation actually happened. This is exactly what makes out of shape and afraid cops dangerous. They don’t “want” to shoot anyone, but they as so afraid they resort to deadly force quickly.
0 likes35:00 is why not because he wanted to kill
0 likestrolling fun...dont u get the point...u should do better..marquis ddnt..im careful
0 likeslots of people like that
0 likes@A Blank Slate I can't help feeling this sentence could only be said by someone living in the US or some 3rd world country
0 likesAgreed.
0 likesUpdate, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison. He'll be 69 years old at his release date. I wonder if his arm will have healed by then...
278 likesReplies (5)
Nice
16 likes@TrashBoat 🙏🏻
4 likesDam only 20? that’s a shame.
12 likesWonder how long after he gets out before he "defends himself" again.
7 likes@Jeff Kaplan got a lot of free time on your hands, eh Jeff ?:D
0 likesthe fake ass sadness he puts on after they tell him the man died is pathetic
1 likeReplies (1)
exactly. he’s literally proud of his crime. it infuriates me
0 likesThis guy couldn't wait to pop somebody. These types of guys go to bed at night just dreaming about shooting "bag guys", but are actually the bad guys themselves.
1584 likesReplies (31)
@moshtito I agree with the notion that aggressing strangers is dangerous
3 likes@moshtito my understanding is that the guy who had the gun confronted the other guy inside the the store before the incident. I could be wrong though. Either way, don't start fights if you're not prepared to deal with a crazy guy with a gun
3 likes@moshtito He pushed the guy for screaming bloody murder at his wife and getting close to the car. This isn't a justification whatsoever, not for the shots fired during that whole event.
32 likesIt's also worth noting that Drejka had a concealed carry license. The gun wasn't visible - it wasn't SUPPOSED to be visible. If it were, perhaps McGlockton wouldn't have pushed him, but even then, you never expect to get shot over a parking space. And no one should have to.
Bag guys
10 likes@Pauul Kubasek i see them all the time at my local supermarket
11 likesLmao I bet he brought that gun everywhere with him just waiting and hoping he could use it. When he got shoved I bet he thought “This is my chance!”
15 likes@Andrew Francis 💯
4 likes@Andrew Francis it's not that funny, because that's exactly what happened... that same guy had been part of multiple incidents before that thankfully didn't escalate to the level of this.
7 likesbag guys
0 likesYES
0 likes@Yoyi Yoyo someone pushing you onto the ground over a parking dispute is in no way an excuse to pull a gun under any circumstances, regardless of how the gun is going to be used.
10 likes@Yoyi Yoyo I agree, he was probably scared half to death but he did have enough time to assess the situation before shooting
4 likesPoor bag guys, they just try to float around the sky, why he gotta shoot them
3 likes@auto144p He started a fight. That is what happens when you shove somebody. He could have just as easily walked to his car rather than shoving the guy....
3 likes@AlmedinG maybe he was more sane previously. People don't become hungry to shoot over night. It's a process. Just like very few people with gambling and alcohol addictions don't just become addicted overnight.
0 likesI work at a gun store and, yes, you’re right. I see these kinds of people all the time. It’s so disappointing to hear them try to deny their wishing of being put into a self defense situation, while waxing about their ability or capacity to “do what they gotta do”. I’m sure this type of case is much, much too common.
8 likesaccurate
0 likesRonnie from Observe and Report.
0 likesI know of some of them kinds of people and yes.
2 likesThose bag guys are nothing but trouble
0 likes@Gronald Scratch you clearly don't understand what im saying. Its fine. Its youtube. Good luck in life
3 likesYup, got that impression too. The way he thinks he knows how to talk to the cop's on a technical level, the way he seems to know the intricate details of fire arm self defense. The previous 3 events with road rage incidences with him drawing his gun.
3 likesThis guy in my opinion was just looking for altercations to get into and trying to provoke the other person into a response that he thought would justify him discharging his firearm.
Ironically and without realising it, I think Markeis was the one standing up to the loud mouth bully that day, not Durkeri.
@Justin Holmes Markeis may have made the first physical move, but Drejka started the altercation. If some guy started screaming in my wife/partners face I would have probably done more than shove him. Let's face it, that's why he screamed at his wife, he knew it'd get the bigger reaction, its a male pride/spouse defense thing and most of us know it.
2 likesYou can't provoke someone deliberately then claim self defense when it escalates and a bullet isn't the next level response to being pushed.
Regardless, Drejka pulled his gun and Markeis backed up, if he'd stepped towards him again then things might be a little 'greyer' but if you shoot someone who's backing down, your f@&ked.
He didn’t force the guy to assault him from the back much less be a dibshit and park in a handicap spot lol
0 likesIt amazes me how many barney bois i see
0 likes@uncledibby barney bois? Can you explain?
0 likesI do believe he was looking for trouble. And while I also believe this was definitely murder, her boyfriend absolutely should not have pushed him, or at least not that hard.
0 likesIt doesn’t matter what this guy says, to your girl or in front of your girl. Until physical threat is displayed, you cannot lay hands on someone. He should’ve practiced some self-control. Just walk away, direct your woman and kids back in the car; let the moron who’s looking for trouble, find the trouble somewhere else.
Just because someone else is in the wrong, doesn’t mean it’s up to you to make it right. Because sometimes making it right, will cost you something.
@SOLDIER DRUM CHANNEL facts
0 likes@TTV_MrJack People die from getting shoved dude, If you hit your head wrong its lights out, game over. A violent thug creature attacked him from behind. He got what was coming to him.
0 likes@SCFan 07 Nice b8 m8, I r8 8/8.
2 likes@SCFan 07 SCAM CITIZEN!
0 likesOklahoma USA 🙏🇺🇸❤️👍
0 likesIn case anyone is wondering, he was sentenced for 20 years in October 2019.
280 likesReplies (14)
I was wondering, and that is exactly what I was searching for in these comments. Thank you
19 likesBeautiful Boy you know there’s a thing called google too!
3 likes@SittingBearProd yes, im aware.. I was reading to see more than just that. Thank you for your help advice regardless.
11 likesSo he'll be out in 8 years
12 likes@Logan Frost yeah, probably 😖 The way of the world really is something else.. full of people that feast on being below zero..
3 likesThis channel shows the contrast. That girl who murdered her daughter is free right now
8 likesnot from us, but i love to see trials and stuff, and i know usa have harsh sentences ( max here is 25 for the worst crime), but 20 for this in the usa context i think its not "many" ( but i belive\agress that a 25 limit is adequate). just feels to me "low" for the usa standards. this guy just killed because he wanted, i guess he should have been acused of murder not Manslaughter.
0 likesSittingBearProd not rly worth my Google time
1 likeLogan Frost violent cases are usually still 85% of the sentence. Non violent can drop to 33%.
1 likeGlad, he should of got more time.
0 likesmedx44 👏🏻
0 likesSaffier Van der hoef would be less usually in Canada.
0 likes@Saffier Van der hoef 20 for this and i saw a kid 17 old that go on to a robbery with a uncle, dont do anything, and got 40 [even when he was clear reabilitated, but the judge give him the finger] ( he was black)
0 likesI think he is already out because of covid....
0 likesIs JCS on any other platform active?
0 likesHis lack of remorse after having just killed a father is pretty shocking. Hearing that he had used his firearm in other traffic incidents raises major red flags.
833 likesReplies (25)
they see all the red flags and STILL let it slide. Always.
38 likesThe father who also assaulted him?
28 likes@RiotEpidemic bruh
14 likes@khali edwards him being a father is relevant to his lack of remorse. And you can see him come to that realization at the beginning when he talks about how all he remembers after going to his car are people talking about kids.
14 likes@khali edwards If the idiot with the gun had called the police and reported the tags, this whole situation would not have happened.
35 likesHe had no business approaching the car and circling it. NONE. He is not an authority figure.
@khali edwards
11 likesFirst of all I'm not pivoting. I'm directly addressing your, "if he hadn't pushed him" arguement. I'm taking it further and saying if the gun toter had taken the plate number and dailed 911, this whole situation wouldn't have happened.
I personally don't care how pissed off someone is about a parking space that no handicapped person is complaining about. If a handicapped person had confronted her, then MAYBE my opinion would be different. Michael was not in need of that spot, and if he was pissed off over concrete with painted lines over them, he needs to get a life. He claims he was retired at 30, which stands to reason why he has no life. Which also explains why he is patrolling a gas station parking lot.
You know nothing of what i believe politically. I don't care about people having guns. I have a problem with idiots shooting and killing someone with it because they were pushed, after starting a confrontation for no reason
@khali edwards I trully hope you dont genuinely believe that, I really hope that if you killed a man in fron of his kids you would at least feel remorse(which is the only relevant part of being a father here, the remorse).
7 likesAnd yeah the decition to immediately shove him was horrible. But then again, drejka also placed himself in a situation that he admits coupd have been dangerous and he also admits that if he didnt carey a gun, he wouldnt have confronted the woman over a parking space. And by that logic if drejka hadnt shot a man he wouldn't be doing 30 years in prision.
And we really dont know if michael would have shot him either way, he was found guilty of brandishing his gun at other people over traffic and stuff like that. And the shot was unessary to begin with, just showing his gun was more than enough force and would have been the best response, but then he went on and shot a man who was walking away "in self defense".
It seems to me he was just scared and has no idea what self defense means, but given his past behavior of brandishing guns its also possible he was just waiting for an excuse to use it.
@khali edwards and I get that, but no one was saying that him being a father was relevant to the assault(which even then it kinda is my man, drejka was shouting at his wife, who was there with his kids in the middle of the night) so its not like marquis assaulted him for "no reason", even if its not justified, he had a pretty good reason:protect his wife and kids.
3 likes@khali edwards and Im not answering your "what ifs" because I dont think they are relevant. We have no idea how Michael would have responded if marquis shouted instead of shoving, shooting him was already an over reaction, we cant know for sure if he wouldnt also overreact to a man shouting at him. Hes pulled out his gun over less in the past.
7 likesI didnt get that part of slugging, do you mean if marquis slugged michael or if michael slugged marquis?
And the last point we can also say "if drejka hadnt gotten into a heated argument(that he instigated) he wouldnt be serving a 30 year sentence in prision".
I just dont see the point in questions like that, theres a million what ifs that would have changed everything, but things happened the way they did and thats we can really go with.
@khali edwards once again. completely different situations. if he had just never approached the car then i could arguably say then none of this would have happened. someone pushing you does not give the right to shoot someone. it would’ve been a different story if they were both armed or the other guy had beaten him to a pulp. if it was a women then it once again would’ve been a completely different situation. as explained in the video. the father takes his step back away from the gun after seeing the gun and is then shot after. if this situation happened where a women was pushed and then soon after the pusher was backing up and shot then yes maybe she would be put to court for manslaughter. i wasn’t bringing attention to the fact that he was a father in anyway. in fact was not responding to that part of your comment at all. you saying that is he was a father is irrelevant is a part of your argument rather than the whole argument.
3 likes@khali edwards There were witnesses that said there was loud screaming, so it is justified that he is defensive once realizing that a grown man is screaming at his girl. You’re defending him, period. No matter how you phrase it, no matter how many metaphors or hypothetical situations you create...your end point is: he should’ve never “assaulted” him. So at the end of the day, you are still on the shooters side and throwing a tantrum that people “aren’t understanding your point”. No, we understand it, and it’s wrong.
3 likes@khali edwards how do you see a guy getting pushed away from the lady and children he had no authority to be yelling at as "assaulted for no reason"?
0 likes@khali edwards I wasn't really speaking legally. I was just pointing out he had a reason to push him. He wasn't yelling at him. He was yelling at a his wife and 3 kids under 6 yrs old. I'd imagine pushing him away would be a somewhat natural response for a dad/husband who thinks his family is being threatened.
0 likes@khali edwards dude, of course he did wrong assaulting him... but doesn't justify killing him!! in front of his wife and three kids!! absolutely outrageous to read people defending a KILLER.
0 likesAccording to the interrogation he didn’t even know if he hit him. So how is he supposed to know he killed him?
0 likes@khali edwards dude don’t argue with a black dudes wife or your are subject to get done like he did dude
0 likes@khali edwards I’ve been assaulted plenty of times in school out of school in jail and If I were to do what he did id be in jail for life lol
0 likesHe defended himself
0 likes@Mark Stark The wife was a grown ass woman and it takes two to argue. You can't put it all on Drejka and even if you could it wouldn't justify physical force in response to a mere argument. Especially if you're going to keep coming at someone after you've knocked them to the ground. That's a serious threat.
1 likeAnd being black has nothing to do with it. Not even sure why you think that matters. Black people can control themselves just like everybody else.
@khali edwards he could’ve just blatantly smoked dude for walking up to his car and claimed he thought his wife was in danger right? He wasn’t in deadly situations got pushed . People get shoved all the time . When you got shoved at school did you pull out a 45 and shoot probably not . We all have our opinions but even if you break it down in the law dude was bogus
0 likes@thrdeye the disrespect you would have to even have the gall to walk up to my car talk shit to my wife bro and speak to her without me present knowing I’m around and we could talk it out ? Nah that’s not how that work
0 likes@Mark Stark McGlockton was inside the store well before Drejka arrived. Not that it matters because we don't live in some backwards honor culture where a woman must be spoken to through her husband (which he wasn't, they were only boyfriend/girlfriend) and disrespect is answerable with violence.
3 likes@khali edwards mate it was hardly assault
0 likesHe assaulted him and he also didn’t know if he even hit him at this time so. I think they are both in the wrong the guy should not have pushed him outta nowhere like that for no reason and Michael shouldn’t have shot him as he backed away
0 likeswhen he was brought in for the interrogation, was the guy pronnounced dead yet?
0 likesThe moral of the story: Park wherever you god damn please, and push people around and get physical if they dare to confront you about it. Oh and NEVER talk to cops without an attorney present.
0 likesYou're welcome.
Replies (1)
Moral of the story; Don’t initiate an altercation cos you think you’re a big man, and then shoot a person cos they push you over when you are appearing to be a threat to his wife and family. This man deserves to do prison time, he took a life, that he clearly shouldn’t have. Your view of this is skewed. You’re welcome.
0 likesYea 25 to life
0 likesWow, what a sad case. I feel terrible for the victim, and their family.
1 likeI entirely agree with the sentence, but I do believe that Michael didn't have malicious intent. I believe that he was already in a frantic state from his argument, and with his mind racing wasn't thinking properly. But that doesn't excuse the fact that he shot a man who was protecting his family, and then retreating when he saw the gun.
Yes right
0 likes"It's not very polite to park here"
2796 likes>proceeds to murder a man
Replies (76)
He was fucking attacked.
61 likes@serpens8 he had several road rage incidents in which he threatened other drivers with his firearm. He may have been attacked, but he sure as hell was looking for any reason to shoot someone.
302 likes@serpens8 you should put some money on his books so he can buy some snacks for the next 20 years
106 likesThis is a sad story, all the way wrong.
11 likes@serpens8 the man was pushed yes but if you look in the security footage the man who pushed him backed up was soon as he saw the gun and stood there. he literally just shot someone who backed up from him. the man didn’t even have a weapon. he shot someone for them pushing him. please rewatch this if you still think he was in the right.
161 likes@lex the imposter It was half a second, the guy with a gun was in a strong emotional arousal, and if he felt somewhat threatened, he was not really mistaken. He got 20 years because the "victim" was black. Just imagine the situation in reverse, a black samaritan and an arrogant white family. Do you think he would get 20 years prison? I don't think so.
22 likes@serpens8 you think black people are given preferential treatment in the criminal justice system 🤣🤣🤣🤣
207 likes@Henry Balling exactly!
8 likes@serpens8 Exactly, he was decked from the blindside, who knows what was coming next. He needed a lawyer here, not running his mouth off.
22 likes@✿MJF✿ First the (gunman) made it clear that he felt he safe to approach the car, because he had the gun. When the husband came out due to the commotion, had the (gunman) not been so close to the car - and the wife getting out of the car - I really think the husband would have verbally confronted the (gunman) rather than giving him the sharp shove. The (gunman) had clearly made his point to the wife that he was offended by her parking in the handicap spot but couldn't let it go at that. He made his point to the husband that he was offended by being shoved, and even though the husband demonstrated he got the point by backing away, the (gunman) couldn't let it go at that. So very sad, such a senseless tragedy.
30 likesYup. When I was young I was ignorant of how long white supremacy and nationalists specifically have had their culture in US. I though because I grew up in a time of “hey it’s not murder central” that racism wasn’t so prevalent. But I was wrong. And shamefully adopted cultural norms I thought were norms but were just norms inside these circles of racists that they try making mainstream. Literature has been one cultural tool they’ve used for a long time. White supremacists literature exists and is disgusting. Propaganda tools used to infect our minds with double thinks and double speaks. Telling ourselves “we love freedoms and small government🇺🇸“ but being ok with banning gays from marry (let alone live for a long time) women to make bodily decisions, migrants come to this country just like how our ancestors did , etc. hypocrite are designed and made through the factories of information like movies, books, tv, events, family stories, opinions, religion, idols,
17 likes😂😂😂😂😥😮
0 likesI just LMAO...out of the extreme irony you pointed out- not the situation, of course.
0 likes@serpens8 I think you juxtaposed your colors.
11 likes@serpens8 He was shoved and the attack stopped, dude was observably in no immediate danger and shot a guy
36 likescnn?
1 likeNo it is because you has a weak body and got slammed on the floor while the father was slightly stepping backwards and he did not want to wait until the father pulled out a gun or rushed him.
3 likes@Balloon Eater your name is fitting
16 likes@Tobi XD. He did not know if the father had a gun so he could have used the car as cover.
2 likes@Tobi you either support the father or the guy who shot him. They were both engaged in combat and were trying to kill each other when the guy with the gun won. How is the guy with the gun supposed to know that the father would have used his gun behind cover when he pulled out his gun? There are many unexplored factors
5 likes@Balloon Eater i- I really hope you don't own any firearms. You are the type of person who makes me concerned.
15 likes@✿MJF✿ If someone punched me I would absolutely shoot them - punches can fucking KILL you. So can shoving someone down.
3 likesStop defending assault you lowlife.
American beings americans. 2nd amendment AMARYTE !?!?
11 likes@serpens8 It's a push, dont be a soft american.
13 likesYeah that's not very polite 😜
0 likesAlso why does someone walk around with a gun LOADED in his pocket to go to the store ????
5 likesWhy are men 95% of the prison inmates? Is it because of female supremacy, and because men are oppressed by our criminal justice system? Remember that all your answers about men will also apply to black men.
0 likes@customsongmaker That's uhh...not how equivalency works, my guy.
2 likes@Funny Valentine Did Nothing Wrong - so you don't define black men as "men".
0 likes@customsongmaker No, I do. But, your analogy incorrectly assumes that black men are not frequently given harsher sentencing for the same, or often lesser, crimes. What lands a white guy two years probation and community service can often land a black man even longer in prison. Hence why I called out your false equivalency.
2 likesNice attempt at trying to insinuate I'm racist though. Ten points for that.
@Funny Valentine Did Nothing Wrong - why are there more white men in prison than black women?
0 likes@customsongmaker Okay, I see what you're trying to do here. So, let me break this down to a much more simple analogy.
5 likesLet's say you, me, and a third person are all at a party, right? The host starts serving drinks. The random guy gets a full glass. I get half a glass. You get 1/4 of a glass. We are not on equal footing simply because we're both not getting a full glass, because you very clearly received less than I did.
Similarly, just because men are all incarcerated at a higher rate than women, does not mean black men are not discriminated against more than white men.
Doubling down on logical fallacies doesn't make the first one magically accurate. It just makes your argument worse.
@Funny Valentine Did Nothing Wrong - men are the ones with the 1/4 glass, women are the ones with the full glass. What's your point? And women are the ones hosting the party and deciding who gets what, since women have been the majority of voters for 100 years and decide every election.
0 likes@customsongmaker Oof. Touched a nerve on that one huh. Poor guy.
6 likes@Funny Valentine Did Nothing Wrong Yep, he is defo an Incel.
5 likes@Larry Chunk I'm defending a man that was killed for pushing someone. If you think I'm a disgusting piece of shit for that so be it
4 likesDoes anyone have an explanation for why white men go to jail more often than black women?
0 likes@ShadowDante Gaming - the police asked him if he knew talking to someone might lead to a confrontation. Oddly, they didn't ask the same thing of the man's wife after her mouth got him killed.
0 likes@Lili Da - if an old man standing there makes you want to push him down, possibly killing him, then don't be so surprised if you get shot. Remember the cop that barely pushed an old man, and the old man fell over and hit his head and almost died? People wanted to kill the cop for that, because idiots only look at who won and feel sorry for the loser who started it and couldn't finish it.
0 likes@✿MJF✿ cops do
1 likeAll the time..
They cant wait for an altercation
@Think Tank >Person who routinely harasses people over minor transgressions and immediately reaches for his gun to threaten people when things aren’t going his way.
1 like>Person who shoots an unarmed, retreating man in the chest.
>Person who was proven guilty in court and rightly spending most of his remaining years in prison.
>Weakass man who has no gun in prison
@Jaco Oosthuizen I’m American and support this message. Too many terrified pussies with guns.
1 likeWhat percent of shoves end up in someone beating a defenseless man to death? This guy is with his family. Yes, he crossed the line shoving the guy, but nothing suggests he’s about to give up everything over this.
@Sean Matthew King - you say "if the guy had hit his head and died, the other guy should go to prison".
0 likesIf you're dead, it doesn't help you at all that your killer is sent to prison. Would you like to see some videos of men on the ground being kicked in the head repeatedly, their attackers stealing their pants and laughing and dancing?
Scream at my gf and see what happens. It's not a tough guy thing it's a protection thing
0 likesthe shooter was trigger happy. This isn't his first rodeo
0 likes@serpens8 he was pushed and walked away from. He was under no threat.
0 likesi see we have a BLM persone here you didnt see the attack on the person just the criminal being hurt lol
1 likeWow, my comment really created a thread of stage-4 cancer huh
1 like@Lafonda williams "the criminal being hurt" You mean murdered. The word you're looking for is murder, there. And, also, y'know. Guy wasn't a criminal. Saw someone acting in a threatening manner towards his significant other and acted. Saw the murderer-to-be was armed, visibly retreated, only to be shot anyway.
0 likesserpens8 that’s not an argument :))
0 likes@serpens8 awww a push
0 likes@✿MJF✿ to be clear, watch the video agaiin (haven't read this full thread yet, specifically responding to "And then the guy backed away but he pulled the gun out anyway." He was APPROACHING the shooter as he drew, he started to back away in the middle of the draw, likely once he knew what was coming. having said that, the shove wasn't justified, the draw was 100% justified, the shot was NOT justified, and I support the verdict.
0 likes@Zeron Peat racism is ok then when blm does it? side note, let women decide, the problem is whether or not another human life is involved. I don't share the opinion that a zygote is a human life, nor do i support the option to abort and kill a baby up to 9 months, at SOME point between those two it becomes a human life, and has its OWN rights to life. Before that happens if she doesn't want it then let her do as she wishes. The only seriously controversial part i think i have, is that a man should also be able (without HER consent) to sign away all rights and responsibilities (she must be made aware while she still has a choice) toward the child, just as she can.
0 likes@charlymaoo he was shoved, the man still approached him, the draw was justified, the shot (as he changed and started to move away) was not
0 likes@Scott Lyman he was walking towards him as he started to draw, that said it also isnt necessarily a lie if you believe what you are saying. Keeping in mind, I am not defending the shot (just the draw) and I fully support the guilty verdict.
0 likes@Skylar Weekes murder is incorrect, it was manslaughter
0 likes@customsongmaker there is a difference between men and women biologically, that is not a comparison to black men.
0 likes@Funny Valentine Did Nothing Wrong that is usually based on history not race
0 likes@Tom La Pont manslaughter*
0 likes@Lil Valor no, pushed then approached, he started to move back mid draw as he saw what was happening, that said the shot is still unjustified.
0 likes@Sean Matthew King to be fair, there are people in the comments defending the shove.
0 likes@Sean Matthew King the "shove for yelling at his wife" cant be justified as he was more than an arms length away from the vehicle when the husband came out, she got out and approached the shooter by her own choice, removes any justification
0 likes@Tanner then if you do you should also be in jail, scream or talk or chastise isnt illegal, and she got out and closed the distance, clearly not concerned he was a threat.
0 likes@TacoKat he was still approaching after the push, until he saw the draw happening, sooooo justified pull, not justified shot
0 likes@Nytric Oxide still incorrect, he was approaching the man on the ground before the draw started
0 likes@Henry Balling pretty much the internet, you just had a place to let some grow
0 likes@Funny Valentine Did Nothing Wrong she got out and approached him in sight of her husband, no grounds to shove him. the draw was also justified as he was still approaching him on the ground, halfway THROUGH the draw he starts to back away, shot not justified.
0 likes@75ur15 no, you’ve got your order mixed up there. He shoved him to the ground, stood still for a split second as the suspect fell, suspect immediately draws weapon, man notices it and starts backing up as soon he saw... then was shot as he took multiple steps back. Unjustified indeed, case closed and I don’t even see why you felt the need to refute what I’ve said before.
0 likes@75ur15 - so you're saying that the reason black men to to jail more often than white women is that you think black men are biologically more violent?
0 likes@serpens8 getting pushed is not a reason to kill someone lol
0 likes@serpens8 he also threatened multiple other women and men saying he would kill them. But that oks?
0 likes@Terri Kay if someone is that lightweight then at that point they should just live in a hamster ball bubble because them falling down 1 feet would cause their legs to snap
0 likes@Tobi He already tried to kill him by pushing him onto concrete, who's to say?
0 likes@-- it a absolutely does. People die all the time from shoves and punches that cause their head to hit the ground.
0 likes@serpens8 He pulled the gun and chose to shoot, but 2 people he was aiming towards were already attempting to flee with even less time to react.
0 likes@serpens8 he just fell on the ground, I have seen ppl punch each other faces, they still don't f***ing kill each other.
0 likesGot to admire how smart these police officers are in making Drejka feel like comfortable about being under arrest. Lots of Please. Thank you. Can I get you anything? Are you OK? He clearly thinks\feels that they are on his side and fully sympathize with everything he has to say. He is made to feel that they are THERE for him, and that he is the victim who was about to be killed if he did not use his gun.
113 likesReminds me of Michael Dunn who shot at the red car and killed a young guy because they played loud music. Both cases could have been easily avoided..but they just had to get confrontational and use their guns.
182 likesReplies (16)
Exactly, yet they claim self defense.
32 likes@Guy Lindquist Literally all of history? Ever heard of the Tulsa Massacre?
13 likesYes, I remember that. Both seemed to have waited for a chance to show how "smart" they are. Loser. Both.
6 likes@Guy Lindquist that’s just completely incorrect wtf is wrong with you?
3 likesBoth events are also "man bites dog" scenarios as usually it's the black teen doing the shooting
2 likesI was thinking the same thing
1 likeJust watched him before this almost the same situation
1 like@Guy Lindquist sounds like somebody got triggered.
0 likes@Melatonin Yah, the dead guy literally did. lolz
0 likesBoth George Zimmerman Wannabe s
0 likes@Guy Lindquist That's...not accurate at all, but go on, I guess...
0 likes@Robert Campbell no you go ahead and tell me what’s inaccurate.
0 likes@Guy Lindquist There was no rape. Even the girl said he just grabbed her arm. The fact that there were already over 1,000 white people present, some were armed, and that they had already demanded Rowland be given to them is not in dispute. Nor is there dispute that the 75 black men offered to help the sheriff protect Rowland from the already formed mob. NOR is there any question that the first act of violence was a gun battle, not a "mass slaughter." I understand you want to frame it in the way that best fits your "blacks are violent criminals" narrative, but none of this is in doubt, even at the time.
0 likes@biscaya08 The Dunn case is very different from this. In the Dunn case the victim didn't initiate the confrontation.
0 likes@Tonja Catchings You mean the Tulsa Race Massacre, the one where 75 black guys decided to play cop and start a mini racewar?
0 likesWell, other than the fact that one case was instigated by loud music and the other was instigated by being shoved 5 feet in the air, sure. Exactly the same .
0 likesI love your videos is saddens me that YouTube is doing this to all these channels. I really hope you guys can make it through! Much love and appreciation for all the work you put into these ❤️
21 likesReplies (3)
What happened?
1 like@Zeze Omer YouTube keeps removing videos and then letting them back up on their channel for whatever reason, but all these other channels can have the crime scene photos and what not and never be taken down so it makes no sense
0 likes@Hanan Jackson thats absurd
0 likesIt’s really interesting how the defendant uses phrases like “force multiplier”, “neutralize the threat”, etc etc. Are those police/military terms? Because I don’t think the defendant served in those fields, which makes me think he’s using them to impress the officers—frame himself as an extrajudicial authority—or because he’s watched too many war movies and it seems cool.
26 likesReplies (2)
I think it's just to sound proficient, that way they can deflect the idea that they acted on anger or fear, which judging by the facts by themselves seem to be exactly what happened
3 likesYeah he’s a wannabe
1 like"the gentleman you shot is deceased"
38 likes"Thanks for that, what else you got? Can I go now?"
The lack of shock or remorse is stunning
"Did he say anything?"
50 likes"N e g a t i v e"
I hope this guy enjoyed his fifteen minutes of role-playing a soldier.
How can this guy think that he was not to blame for this?!?!?! He instigated the entire event. Sure, the victims should not have parked in the handicap spot illegally, if that is in fact what they did. Either way, that was none of his business, also, he parked illegally as well. He wasn’t even in a parking space. Had just parked, and entered the store to do whatever it was that he was stopping there for, this horrible tragedy would never have occurred. I feel horrible for the victim and his family, Especially his children that witnessed their father being murdered in cold blood.
10 likesReplies (1)
Exactly. No where does it ever even say if one of them was allowed to park there and not only that but we do t even know what that spot looked like. It might not be obvious it’s a disabled spot
1 likeThe biggest tragedy is the son who had to watch his dad die in front of him.
47 likesReplies (1)
That a nice thing to say. But we all know the bigger tragedy was the dude who died. Get real.
1 likeThis is ironically the third episode where a Floridian felt threatened enough to pull a gun to defend. These videos are awesome documentaries. NOT JUSTIFIED and NOT truly unjustified. What's the odds that 3 criminal cases on multiple channels were 3 stories of white men feeling they were threatened by black men encounters. Is this a southern concept??? If you grew up in Brooklyn NY I lived a similar fear of "cultural" or "race" misunderstanding. Sure haters will say I'm a Yankee from NYC but the ripple effect of slavery-era American history haunts me and will my son and his kids.
3 likesWe will not all think or act the same... Ever! We have a different history and upbringing. All our discussion is not going to erase English domination or colonization (including slavery). The realism is that despite our ugly past, the present (survivors) are still battling whether the confederate flag should appear embossed on State flags. Whether Statues of Christopher Columbus should be staged in city parks. We here in the USA just celebrated MLK Day. For many it is a day off from school and work.
Instead of erasing history, celebration of people that made (at the time acceptable choices) Let's not erase our past but pose counter statues in those parks, accept (not mistakes) but consider it was the norm and without those (looking for words YT will find offensive) people who were [Hitler-like] enslaved tens of thousands to be enslaved. Made this country great and something we all should be benefiting from.
I say forget tearing down the memorials and focus on moving forward. What is to come next... blow off 2/3 of the Mount Rushmore monument because someone disagrees? Rename the capitol of our country and a state? Slave owners. Discredit them all but you can't change the future by forgetting your past. Everyone suggesting Washington as a hero was only made so by his use of slave labor. SO easily forgotten.
I've said too much and will clearly draw haters.
I believe we should all get along as Christ would want us to. I hate politics but I love my fellow man regardless of skin color, faith or origin.
It's a New Year... I wish all that read my sermon to find peace and happiness for themselves and their families and let's all work to make this a better life (outside of the media and politics)
"no need to be in a defensive state of mind"
6 likesAs an extremely defensive person, to my own detriment, being defensive is 100% not an indication of guilt.
I dunno man, the moment you pulled a gun on someone that arent with a gun or a knife on hands, you pretty much won the encounter 9 out of 10 times, because anyone who has at least 3 working braincells know you dont try to draw when you are on someone's aim.
1 likeNever, ever, talk to the police without consulting a lawyer first.
0 likesWow, he is very confident in himself interacting with those police officers as they take him into the interview room for somebody who shot someone!
1 likeIf I’ve learned anything from this channel is not to talk to the police without a lawyer.
1 likeCase in point. He hasn't fought anyone who wasn't half his size since he learned a lesson in his twenties. That's when he bought a gun. Just in case someone his size reacted to his nonsense again.
1 like"There's no reason to go overboard." Says the person who just murdered a man in cold blood for pushing him. 🙄🙄🙄
16 likesReplies (1)
To be fair. In that moment I don't think he knew the other guy was dead. He waited in his car for the police. The man wasn't declared dead until he got to the hospital. Before you talk to your lawyer they are very tight lipped about information. He probably didn't know the guy was dead during this interview.
0 likesI like how people think that their last ditch effort doesnt just make it worse, its a paradox
0 likesRIP MY CONDOLENCES TO THE FAMILY
4 likesOMG, NEVER talk to the cops without a lawyer, especially if you think you're justified in what you did. He dug his own hole.
0 likesI've now learned after hours of this: Don't talk to the police without a lawyer. Also don't kill anyone
1 likeIf we would all just mind our own business , what a great world we could have.
1 likeimagine being the loved ones and families of the victim and hearing that your dad who was unfairly taken from you was the one in the wrong and the man who killed him was the victim. that would just be heartbreaking on every single level.
4 likesLove these breakdowns man!
1 likeThere was plenty of parking at that store,... It looked to me that the disability parking spot was father than all the other empty parking spot,. I'm disabled and there are some occasions that people irresponsible,. And take a spot for hurt people and that can be irritating,... That poor family, honestly didn't probably see the spot,... This guy is a nut,.,. He should never be let out of prison
0 likesWhen told the man he shot is dead, he had no reaction whatsoever. His speech, reactions, everything, was pure video game. Not real life.
3 likesImagine being a lawyer, seeing the video, and still defending the man. Wow. Lawyers man
1 likeThe opposite of this cry baby coward is the cop who proudly, rightfully so, retires never having discharged their firearm. Kudos to not using too much force.
1 likeI've seen so many cases where the prosecutor mixes up the plaintiff and defendant's names and I just want to scream at the video and correct them lol
0 likesAfter read Miranda rights, best thing to do is refuse to speak until your lawyer is present.
1 likeI wonder if the victim would push the wacko to the ground if he knew he was packing heat. My bet is no, he wouldn´t. I say this because during a confrontation what you want is a de-escalation, not snapping into physicallity and pushing a possible nut-job to the ground. Either you should call the cops straight away or at least calmly talk to the guy and try to make him realise how much of an idiot he was being at that moment. I find it always sad to see someone die, but this was perfectly avoidable if the victim didn´t decide to play the hero in a country where black people are deemed as a threat even by police let alone gun-happy wackos.
0 likesReplies (1)
You don’t get into a shouting match with a man’s wife or girlfriend with their small children in a car over a parking spot.
0 likesSome people pack heat because they think it saves them from consequences, and the shooter seems to me like a prime example. I don’t understand why you’re more upset about the shoving rather than the shooting
27:00 basically translates to "I can start all the arguments I like, because I've made sure I will win them. Yeah, the other guy might be dead, but I knew I'd be fine."
1 likePersonal weapons are a really bad idea.
Conceal carrying,super truck driving, training in close quarters combat disciplines,puts time in on the range regularly and most definitely shoots with heavy bore long range rifles....starts moving his arms and body like a robot and could pretty much be wearing slings for both his arms cos he got shoved and or pushed with slightly excessive force and hit the ground.
0 likesThis is the type of person who makes legal gun ownership look bad. Irresponsible and cowardly. If you won’t confront someone without a weapon you have even less business confronting them with a weapon.
7 likesReplies (1)
Wanna know the worst part. This guy would have been a self described "responsible gun owner" before this incident. I wonder how many more "responsible gun owners" there are out there that are just like this guy. Living their lives every day hoping for the day they get to use their gun.
2 likesNot cool to park in a disability space, but this guy didn't even need the disability space. He could have just kept his mouth shut and called the police.
2 likes"That's my store"...... "I live just around the corner" - and that extends to he owns the store carpark, the street, and everybody who dares enter the area. Territorial issues, among other things.
1 likei love how in America there are people like this walking around with guns.
1 likeI might have missed it, but appears no words spoken. First person knocked second person to the ground with no warning. Second person shot first person, again with no warning. They both over reacted to a real or perceived threat and no one said a thing.
0 likesSo he illegally parked to ask why someone else was illegally parked? Why pick that car or bother to harass the woman?
1 likeThis guy had a hard on for his gun and is obviously a racist. He approached her because he saw a black woman.
Sometimes it is as simple as that. There are bad people in this world and they show it in varying ways.
I hadn't heard about this case and was literally holding my breath waiting for the verdict. I think I would have thrown my phone in disgust if he been found not guilty. What an absolute waste of a life... I am so glad that these entitled despicable people are arrogant enough to believe they don't need a lawyer.
36 likesReplies (1)
@Keith M Rookie mistake! Never read the comments until after ;) Sorry though! Still awesome x
1 likeDon’t be a placard police. Let it up to the real cops.
2 likesThe father's first instinct was to protect his partner. After getting shot, his first instinct was to run back to his kid inside. Even with no sound you can see how tragic the situation was. That poor brave man and his family suffering by the cruel hand of an evil coward.
31 likesReplies (10)
Crazy part about it he didn’t park in a designated parking spot. One of those “look in the mirror” moment.
1 likeYou literally just saw an hour long video proving how violent force was unjustified, and here you are praising the victim who also used unjustified force in a verbal argument. The sweet irony. Both these guys should not be free to roam in the streets if they have to resort to violence in a situation where violence was not needed in the first place.
7 likes@F R So you're telling me that if someone walks up to someone you care about and start arguing with them for--to you--no apparent reason, you wouldn't get confrontational?
6 likes@meme lord 9000 Is that really what you understood from my comment?? Try reading it again. Read it as many times as you need in order to grasp what I meant. Maybe ask your parents help if you have to.
3 likes@F R I totally agree that they should not have parked in the handicapped spot and that him pushing him was unnecessary, but he was scared for his partner and the kids in the car. I understand one act of transgression to protect loved ones. He also stopped when he realized how much the situation escalated, it's not like he also took out a gun or beat the guy's face in. He didn't deserve to get shot for his actions. Just because you don't approve of what someone does doesn't mean they deserve death.
5 likes@Sophia Goodman-Merel Well that act of transgression cost him his life and left a fatherless child. If you have to resort to violence when someone argues with you, then you are just as guilty as the shooter. Absolutely no pity for neither of them. And people who share your mentality of justifying a violent act when someone who poses no physical threat, are the reason we have overcrowded prisons.
9 likesThink of it this way. If we were arguing about this in person, and I had a loved one near me, would I be justified to knock you down simply because I want to protect my loved ones?? Absolutely not.
@F R trailer park mentality right? Thanks for interpreting the situation for us all to understand. We appreciate your experience.
1 like@Jon Mancuso Go try and make some friends kid. That way you wont be bored wasting your time with useless comments on youtube.
1 like@F R if you think shoving a guy who is actively threatening your wife and kids over a parking spot, (micheal would’ve pulled the gun if mcg didnt come out of the store btw. Hes done that to another mother w kids bc of road rage…) is unreasonable and unjustifiable, i really hopr your partner and children gets threatened by a guy w a gun. Lets see what you do.
0 likes@F R «argues»? The man came up to a black woman w her child unprovoked JUST because they were parked in a handicapped spot. He was dangerous.
0 likesThis entire thing gave me second hand embarrassment 😩what kind of defense was that? I’m not laughing at the situation. God rest this poor man’s soul and God be with his little family😔 but this idiot really thought he was doing something great. He’s a racist mall cop who wanted brownie points for murdering an innocent man
0 likesThank you for pointing out that womans face around 44:34, that absolutely kiilled me
0 likesFor a parking spot come on man. Mind your own business and you do you and this never happens
0 likesHe said he was smart but he ratted on himself for 60 minutes 😂😂😂
0 likesSo he had numerous cases where he threatened other motorists with a gun and they didn’t lock his ass up then? They didn’t do shit to him until he murdered a man for a physical assault, after confronting the victim’s wife over a parking violation, only because he was armed and felt powerful enough to bully her.
0 likesImagine ending someone else's life ALSO your life for parking?.. people who uses gun to win an argument are cowards.
1 likeReplies (1)
he'll get out when he's 70 don't think he ended his life quite yet lol
0 likesi don’t understand why people think that just because they claim “sELf dEfEnSe” that they will get off scot free. Sometimes even abuse victims or actual self defense victims get jail time.
0 likesHe’s had firearms most of his life but I bet he hardly has had any interactions with black people.
1 likeThese goons that like to play war heros… All this “eliminate the threat” and “neutralize him”. He reminds me of Todd kohlhepp.
1 likeI gotta say, he had a really, really poor defense, I could her people yawning and falling asleep
0 likeshe did get assaulted first but he had no right to use the gun, though they have the evidence
0 likesWhy is it so difficult for some people to just mind their own business? The entitlement of some individuals to just say and do what they want and think they’ll face no consequences, is just lost upon me🤦🏽♀️
4 likesits amazing how easy it is for self defense to turn into a violent crime. If the guy did take a step towards him it would have very easily been considered self defense. Drejka is a fool for firing his weapon at that time. situation was defused for at least 2 and a half seconds.
0 likesI know a lot of people will disagree with me, but situations like this are why I generally think it's a bad idea to walk around armed all the time. I don't think the guy should have shoved him, but there was no reason to escalate the situation that much farther. It's not like the handicapped parking spot was going to thank him for defending it against people who don't have the appropriate placards. This reminds me of the Michael Dunn case where he shot at the car and killed a boy with the whole altercation starting off because he thought their radio was too loud.
0 likesThe system doesnt work, but I think in history of the Americas in some nations, the society functions when 1 life is taken, and not 2, and not many. I think Drejka shouldve been revoked and banned from owning a gun.
0 likes44:32 bro my jaw literally dropped when I heard him say that lol
0 likesI noticed at 28:00 the detective asks, "would you be willing to confront people if you didn't carry a weapon?" The suspect responds, "I've been carrying most of my adult life so I can't really answer that." The detective restates his question and the guy repeats his answer. The inability to answer or even entertain a hypothetical question is a significant indicator of cognitive impairment. This probably feeds the suspect's psychopathy, as he is unable to imagine scenarios or lived experiences that are not his own.
8 likesReplies (1)
super interesting observation, makes sense with how he didn't seem to care about his victims face, wellbeing or anything.
0 likesToo bad he couldn’t fight him like a man after getting upset because someone parked illegally. Sounds like a wimp!
1 likeThe interview at the end. I’m just an average person with average problems…. Everything about this guy is below average in my opinion
0 likesDid anyone else notice the lawyer's ears perking up at 47:08? LOL🤣
1 likeThat defense lawyer sounds so unconvincing hahahaha
0 likesI swear I remember Jim did a video on jussie smollett.? Right? It started with news clips about the “attack” then it went to him breaking down Jussie early life and how it may have impacted his approach to life and decision making or something like that?
0 likesThis guy was the aggressor!…. Just because everyone has the right to carry doesn’t mean everyone should carry! WTH
0 likesForce multiplier?!! Wtf
It’s called a force continuum! 🤣😂
Nice analysis of reasonable doubt.
1 likeThe doubt has to be reasonable. Not just a doubt.
gun control is so important and this case can be used as an example were someone is going around confronting people with a weapon and no fear for his life, its disgusting
16 likesReplies (2)
"gun control" you mean the safety?
2 likesToo bad the Mrs. wasn't carrying.
0 likesPeople need to mind their own damn business more often
0 likesBold strategy of Drejka's to hire Garfield as his attorney.
1 likeJust to be clear. He went in there to get snacks on EBT... not with his own money... I guarantee it
0 likesAnd I'm sorry but when you assault someone you just might get shot, my opinion is his own fault
Totally devastating. This guy is a complete arse. A whole family broken coz of his out of control behaviour. A father loses his life when all he wanted to do was get snacks for his kids. So sad. And he'll get out and be able to live his life. The wife and kids should sue him and take every dollar he has now and every dollar he makes in the future. F him.
0 likesWe miss you JCS!
2 likes19 minutes for a paramedic to arrive in response to a gunshot! Not okay!
0 likesin some countries you cant just pull out your gun against someone just pushing you.Forces must be equal in situation. is there something like that is US? in addition you cant just buy a gun without psychology test. İ think these are good things.
0 likesWhat a terrible crime against an innocent family.
0 likesThis dude likely would have gotten off in trial if he’d shut up and gotten a good attorney. A good attorney likely could have convinced a jury he was reasonably in fear of his life if he hadn’t already made so many incriminating statements. Like I always say, I am glad these people talk to police without a lawyer.
0 likes19 minutes for paramedics to arrive?! That's awful for a large city
0 likesif you belive it was self defense or not, pushing someone should NOT justify their death... some of your thought processes are messed up because micheal escalated the situation for no reason! he did not need to jump straight to the use of deadly force, and if he had just threated the guy he would be an asshole, but he couldn't stop there.
1 likeWait they released this man after having him on camera murdering someone???
1 likePoor family was probably terrified the 25 days he walked free makes me sick
0 likesThis jerk got what he deserved. But why did the victim push him? I feel it was a moment of unbridled ego to "defend" the wife. So many cases of men doing stupid things to defend others, often females.
3 likesReplies (3)
who cares
0 likes@Justin Spirito that 'female' was the mother of his children. She was alone with their kids when the jerk(who also by the way parked illegally) accused her of parking illegally and screamed at her. Any man who get pissed of at that. A random dude who has screaming and shouting in front of his kids
1 like@Adwaita B. I know. That's just the issue, he need not have done that. Put the wife in safety, stand in front, reduce the tension, bring calm. Being the tough guy is not always smart. Remember the fireman who shot at the young black boy because his wife cried out, and the guy who killed a man because his girlfriend was angry at the man for not buying her meal.
0 likesOne guy starts conversation with pushing other person quite violently, the other guy immediately ends "the conversation" by shooting. Both overreacted, but obviously jail and death are not exactly the same outcome.
0 likesTbh, I would have parked in a handicap parking space as well.
0 likes3:13 At that point you have nothing to worry about. Cowards are only dangerous when they have guns. That's why they need them.
0 likesThis dude keeps incriminating himself with every second passing by. Should've shut his mouth
0 likesOMG, do you really think this man is worse than Casey Anthony?!
0 likesHis defence lawyer talks to the jury as if they are children.
0 likeswhat made him think he's smart?
1 likeif this fool says the word placard one more fricken time
2 likesI live very close to the exact store where this happened. He killed that man in cold blood. The whole neighborhood knew it. The state knew it. The world knew it. I’m glad he got charged and let’s see what comes of the sentencing.
33 likesGlad to live in Canada where regular people dont carry guns
0 likesstill don’t understand how anyone can just own a gun in America…
0 likesIf it would mind his business that wouldn't happen
1 likeHe probably creamed his pants when that detective shook his hand. What a weirdo lol
0 likes"I didnt see his face at all" proceeds to shoot guy in the face
0 likesAnybody that forces anybody to shake their left hand should go to jail
0 likesThis guy complaining that his wrist hurt after he just shot and killed a man is disgusting
179 likesReplies (7)
That's what I was thinking. You just took someone's life and a few children's father, your poor little scratch does not matter.
7 likesTo be fair, I don't think he knew the man died. But, yeah, it's disgusting. He knew he shot A man and thought his wrist hurting was more important
4 likes@Isaac Q That was probably calculated though, because if nothing had happened one could think it was less of a threat. By virtue of pretending to have been severely injured (oscar-worthy performance btw...) he was trying to raise the level of the threat he was under. So him getting injured and being in pain could add a further step to trying to convince that he was in fear. Let me put it this way, Scenario 1. A guy comes up and pushes you, you get pushed two steps back. Scenario 2, A guy comes to you and pushes you to the ground breaking your arm and you bang your head on the pavement leaving a bloody mark on your face. Which one of these scenarios would most likely give a better ground for self-defense? The second clearly. I doubt his arm was really hurting much or anything, it was more about trying to demonstrate that he was injured and in pain (oscar-worthy performance by the way, how he can barely move it and then just is totally fine waving the arms around later)
1 like@Random Guy
0 likesActually, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation
I think in his own mind he is the victim and doesn't thought he did anything wrong. He assumes he is in the right. He might not even know he just killed a man
0 likesDude panicked and didn't think things through clearly. I feel bad for both of them.
0 likes@The Crypto Pimp one dude died and the others life is ruined/ death sentence didn’t finish it so don’t know
0 likesI feel that people like this who own guns and are gun fanatics are secretly just hoping that there will come a day when they need to use it on someone...
2 likesReplies (2)
Nah, I own a gun, guns are a fun hobby for me, and I hope I never have to use it. I don’t want the responsibility of taking a life and I don’t want to ruin my own life in the process. I have a lot to lose and I don’t want to kill someone’s son, father, brother. But if it came down to protecting my child and wife from an actual threat, like a TRUE us or them situation, I’d have to do it. Guns should be used as shields, not as weapons. Not everyone is fortunate to live in a safe area either. In the super slim chance someone breaks into my house and tries to harm us, you better bet I’m using it. Or carjack my car with my child inside.
1 likeSaying all people who are into guns are looking to shoot someone, is like saying every black guy who shoves you is a deadly threat. The world doesn’t work in absolutes. But there’s always a subset of insane people in every hobby or every mundane facet of life.
That’s like saying everyone who owns a sports car and is a car fanatic is secretly hoping they can kill someone in a fatal accident when they speed. That’s ridiculous
@sabretechv2 I'm not saying ALL gun owners are like that. I'm only saying people like this man who think its all a game or something are like that. I understand shooting guns is a fun hobby, I've shot guns myself in the past, but when you're like this guy talking about the details like its no big deal that he just shot someone to death, that's where it's a problem.
0 likesI'm just saying it seems like this guy was just waiting for a fight to break out some time so he has an excuse to use his gun. So I agree that this guy is an example of one of those insane people in this hobby who take it too far.
Also I'm pretty sure it wouldn't make any sense for the owner of a sports car to want to get into a fatal crash while speeding because the whole reason they own it is to have it and use it for fun. The point of a car like that is to look nice and drive fast, the point of a gun is to shoot it. Where and how you wish to shoot the gun is what makes the difference I guess.
This man’s its a real life dwight from the office
1 likeDoesn’t he feel silly?
1 like40:00
1 likeWould you change anything?
I think, doing it again knowing what I know now, I'd still shoot him while he backed away.
!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Big Barba energy coming off the prosecution lawyer
0 likesCan you imagine how many African-American people died in those circumstances? Especially during segregation? They had no voice, there were no video cameras, nothing to defend themselves.
1 like19 minutes for police to arrive. Yet i pass a cop every mile while in Clearwater.
0 likesI seriously can not believe that they let this guy leave the police station. And also, what would have happened if that man didn't come out the store? Would Michael have justified killing the woman?!? This guy is crazy.
0 likesYouTube algorithm clearly doesn’t include comparing ads with content. Midway through this vid and a shooting game ad happens! 🤦🏽🤦♀️
0 likesHate when he uses terms to look so smart and hate when he says negative...negative...negative...he killed the family person....if he not fire the wife of that guy would stop everything...he would not end him up especially with children in car...sad when person died...because of someone feeling like he control shops parking and that ot his shop...because he goes there everyday...
0 likesI’ll be mortgage free when his out
0 likesthis case hurts me, but I did like the attorney shit. didn't know they present like that.
0 likesTo be fair, if he didn't push him he'd be alive, but he had no right to shoot either, moral of the story : calm the fuck down before you do something unessesarily stupid (yell at a car, push someone to the ground)
1 likeReplies (1)
No, if the guy didn't shoot him he would be alive to day.
1 likeThat is ultimately caused his death.
Using the logic you want we could say if Drejka minded his own business the other guy would be alive so it still comes down to Drejka
That was murder not man slaughter
0 likesThis guy cares more about the parking spot then the kids around
0 likeswhat a good looking cop lol
0 likeswhy don't the police ever have now a sort of contraption with 'true' or 'false'? They used to have them years ago. Surely that would help a great deal?
0 likesWe love you, J C S!
1 likeLawer on 50:20: case lost
0 likesLet this be a lesson for women that like to get their men into fights. It's not worth it.
0 likes15 months after this interview this You Tube video was uploaded!
0 likeswhat did he expect
0 likesThe suspect is a bad person and was looking for trouble. I am glad he will be locked up for a long time. But I’ve noticed very few of the comments point out that the victim should not have shoved the suspect like that. I’m not victim blaming, as obviously he didn’t deserve to die, just saying that you can’t just violently shove people if you don’t like what they’re saying. If he had just ignored him things would have turned out better. Very sad story and I hate that someone lost their life and that the victims wife and kid(s) had to experience that. But just makes you wonder what if he hadn’t done that. Although with this suspect it was just a matter of time before it happened.
0 likes“I knew he was a black guy, that’s all I knew.” Yeah, there we go. That’s a good summary of events
2 likes"I didn't see anything, I know he's a black guy that's it" - that was a real damning statement
2 likesIs this normal American behaviour? i mean from the murderer to the cops?
0 likesThis was fake bravery because he had a gun. He had no problem screaming at a woman..
0 likesSorry personal opinion, he thinks he's got authority and is a bad a$$ because he carries a gun. These are the type of people that don't deserve to carry a gun, theybare dangerous. A young man, father lost his life because this bully tried to enforce a rule.. he could have call the police. 😪
Sorry, you don't get to kill someone because they shoved you.
1 likeThis is what you call jobless behaviour 🥴
74 likesAnd this guy cries about missing his DOGS!? He has just robbed a family off an important figure...a husband and father and he shows no remorse about it!
No lawyer should get people like this off by instructing their statement.. the video is clear. Yet.. that’s what criminal defense lawyers do. I hate criminal defense lawyers.
0 likes3 lessons from this case:
20 likes1. Don't escalate a confrontation by assaulting a stranger.
2. Know when to pull, or not pull the trigger.
3. Keep your mouth shut and get a lawyer whether you believe you were 100% justified or not.
Replies (4)
Rule 1 is certainly true in the USA.
0 likesAnd don't park in handicapped spaces if you are not handicapped.
0 likes@Ras Mus It's true everywhere
0 likes@Rand Paul2024 which is what the suspect did anyway
0 likes22:17 He sounds like Mr Mackey from South Park.
0 likesWhy does the defense attorney talk like Trump? 😂
1 likeIt's situations like these that make the point clear:
35 likesWhen you carry, a gun should not be your first answer for anything. It's the last answer to a life-threatening situation. Obviously, those things happen. But if you can make sure you don't have to draw? If you can ensure the fight doesn't even happen? THAT should be your first answer. De-escalation.
Replies (5)
I think the immediate availability of the weapon alone compels certain people to use it, even when wholly unnecessary.
3 likesThere are so, so many homicides these days over situations that likely would have ended in a fistfight in a time when less people were walking around armed.
There are responsible gun owners out there, but there are also people who believe they're responsible gun owners, yet pull their weapon after being cut-off in traffic or during a verbal dispute with a family member.
Mi Miedo Exactly why I’m all for stricter regulations with guns. There are too many Drejkas in this world.
1 likeGetting rushed from behind by a black guy younger and bigger than you, and him moving in on you once you are down, is absolutely a life-threatening situation.
1 likethis is what happens when lethal weapons are ready and available in fucking supermarket stores.
0 likeswimpymind n I love it when the racists tell on themselves. What does him being black have to do with anything?
0 likesSomebody is dead, because people can’t mind their business!
0 likesLol the shakers defence … the hips don’t lie hahah
0 likes47:49 that guy in the background fell asleep i guess
0 likesI was just a fucking parking space!
0 likesFeed him to the Rats cuz even rodents gotta eat
0 likeshow much did he get?
0 likesIt’s amazing how the jury’s skin color always comes into play when the prosecution is black.
0 likesWe live in America, which is about 13% black. Juries are chosen randomly. It’s about the luck of the draw, not skin colors of the parties.
Replies (1)
that’s your takeaway from this video?
0 likesHow stupid does it sound this all happened over a FUCKING handicap spot. I’m glad he’s jailed.
0 likesThe defendant lawyer sounds so simpering, condescending, and annoying.
0 likesBRING JODI BACK, IT DOESN'T BREAK TOS
0 likesThat man was just waiting for a day he could use his gun. He wanted to be billy badass with a woman and kids in a parking spot but when the man comes to protect his wife and kids suddenly hes weak and scared for his life? Disgusting.
324 likesReplies (32)
That is why you never start a confrontation by pushing someone to the ground. You never know if you're dealing with Mr. Bean or Billy the Kid.
18 likesWaiting for a day? Dude shoved him to the ground. You speak of this from a outside prospective in hindsight. Why are you all of a sudden justifying physical assault? He wasn't attacking her, he was using his 1A to address somthing he saw was a problem. Did he use excessive force? Maybe. But don't use that stupid shit of "hE wAs pRoTeCtInG hIs wIfE"
12 likes@Wooden Monkey Sooooo shoving someone to the ground is now equal to shooting someone and killing him... oookkk!! cool!
43 likes@Ishizu09 no, the charge fit the crime. He definitely committed manslaughter. Hence why he wasn't charged with murder. Just because the man killed him doesn't excuse the physical assault.
5 likes@Ishizu09 you should learn from this not justify physical assault.
2 likes@Biggie Smalls Calm down buddy... You got the point, but that's a bit harsh, aye?
0 likes@Biggie Smalls The DEAD. man... is the ine at fault? Oh wooow, you need to check yourself
6 likes@Marielle Gonzalez they are both at fault, but the victim was the first one to use force.
4 likes@De Kip the man that laid dead inside the store and the terrified wife and children are, at the end of the day, the sole victims. The man with the gun was shoved, yes, but there was plenty of time for him to see the guy backing up, backtracking and then running in the opposite direction.
10 likesHe is a murderer. Nothing more. The only one at fault is him, not the dead man
@Marielle Gonzalez I think you're too imprecise. The killer was in the right until he pulled the trigger. Before that, clearly the victim was at fault for escalating a situation that was entirely caused because he couldn't be bothered to park elsewhere.
3 likesHe was attacked by some random guy and he pulled out his gun in self defense. The guy was just yelling at a woman for disobeying the law by and he decided to get violent as soon as he saw him by pushing him to the ground. There's literally nothing wrong with that. Anyone else in that situation fearing for their life would have done the same.
2 likes@Marielle Gonzalez If he honestly thought a man talking to his wife because he obviously parked on a spot reserved for disabled drivers was attempting to hurt them, the victim has serious problems comprehending situations.
4 likesWhat likely happened was that the victim realized he was in the wrong but couldn't accept that someone dared to complain about him. Afterwards he decided that starting a fight would be the best options to either look good or be "intimidating". Why else would someone attack a guy discussing something with your wife?
The shooter took the other guys action too personal and wanted revenge. I'm not justifying his action in any way.
This is the most plausible scenario:
1. Person A is lazy and parked in disabled spot
2. Person B comes in and discusses why it's wrong (I'm assuming)
3. Person A feels attacked and pushes B to the ground
4. Person B pulls out weapon, Person A retreats.
Up until this point Person B demonstrated perfectly legal behaviour. He was attacked and pulled out a gun to defend himself. Lethal action is only permitted however, if the threat continues to persist, which it definetly did not. This leads to:
5. Person B shoots Person A retreating
This changes the entire scenario. I doubt that the shooter intended to shoot the victim from the getgo, all he wanted was likely to confront the victim (which is perfect behaviour, people abusing disabled parking spots are egoistical assholes).
@Ishizu09 How does that excuse the physical assault?
1 like@Don't drink the Kool-Aid
0 likesDon't physically escalate situations. That was very stupid.
0 likesHe would most likely be alive if he hadn't come out and attacked the dude.
@8jij Joo he’s not a cop he approached as a threat
0 likes@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ I think this is the most acurate comment, in my opinion at least.
0 likesMaybe the lesson with this video is: don't let anger take control, you never know how people will react.
@Joe Mo he’d also be alive if the guy just minded his business, like at the end of the day, he had zero authority to get bitchy w the woman in the car bc it wasn’t his job and it wasn’t any of his concern. People keep trying to be fair by saying “moral of the story is, don’t approach someone with violence bc you don’t know how they’ll react” but are ignoring the fact that the shooter actively and knowingly (he said himself that he knew it could cause problems) put himself in a potentially dangerous situation without knowing how those around him would react. The main difference is that the shooter openly stated that he was confident BECAUSE he had his gun, this is not justified gun use and it’s good that he got time, shit the man literally had a history of threatening people with his gun, like cmon
2 likes@Biggie Smalls fact..
0 likes@Ishizu09 so your saying the guy that blindsided him from behind was weak? Dude really, yeah he shouldnt of shot him but the fact is the deceased shouldn’t pushed, thats not something a weak person would do, so many people like you trying to justify assault, lol pathetic, both are in the wrong........ and if he didnt shoot him this case would have been very different, but people are ignoring the assault because he pulled a gun.
0 likes@Biggie Smalls He should’ve never approached the car to begin with. He went to the store to buy whatever it is he was supposed to buy. He should’ve minded his business and went about his day. He was trying to play police when he should’ve went about his normal day. There wasn’t a handicap person in distress for the spot. He wasn’t handicap so that spot is of no importance to him. While I agree it’s ignorant parking in handicap, it’s also NONE OF MY BUSINESS. I can’t tell a man how to react to seeing another man yelling at his wife while his children are present. But I carry and it’s common sense that you don’t shoot at someone walking away.
0 likes@Sincerely Shell Okay, you say he's in the wrong for approaching the car, let's unpack that. You see somebody doing something illegal(barely illegal in this case, I know, just a minor infraction at this point), some people may just ignore it, and get on with their day. That's fine, as long as it isnt a severe crime being committed. On the other hand, some people may just find out why, which is not getting in other peoples business, because they're openly doing something wrong. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, I have done the same thing before........
0 likesAnd you said "its common sense that you don't shoot at someone walking away", I don't think you understand there is a major major major difference from watching the surveillance footage 10x over at 25% speed, frame by frame, and actually being in that moment. If somebody blindsided you, and they're quite larger than you, and you are laying on the floor not knowing what just happened or what is coming next, you would definitely think differently than how you are now. Everybody likes to play tough man behind a computer screen. Sure Drejka shouldn't have shot, the situation would have been suffice with just brandishing his weapon. But again, heat of the moment situations like this, I can absolutely see how he thought the deceased was a threat.
I still think the deceased handled it just as badly. A fall like that (people in that are 40+ especially), can kill people. It happens more than you would think.
What is even worse is that the family of the deceased is playing 110% victim........ That mentality disgusts me. Assault somebody and then cry when it backfires.
Why didn't the deceased verbally amend the situation? Instead he walked out with ZERO KNOWLEDGE(aside from someone was telling his wife she was breaking the law), and fucking slammed him from behind to the ground....
@Braeden Walster Yup you say that sitting in your home watching the surveillance at 25% playback speed 10x over....... Put yourself in Drejka's shoes, you wouldn't have fucking seen that he was backing up. Stop acting like you're hot shit, In situations like this, the brain functions WAY differently than it does when you aren't in any danger.
0 likes@Chris Hansen Alright, your idea of what happened is twisted, you don't know enough about the situation. Drejka did not start the altercation, and he did NOT yell at her first. They weren't even yelling at each other by the time the deceased walked out, making it 110% unjustifiable to walk up behind someone speaking to your wife and fucking blindside him. If he hadn't done that, and maybe just got in the middle of Drejka and his wife, this whole fucking story wouldn't be a thing. But nope, big man has to play tough guy and violently slam Drejka.... I don't think Drejka is a murderer, and it's a fucking shame he's locked up for twenty years.
0 likes@d i n g d a n g If you read my comment I never excused the murder at all. Because it is nothing more than cold blooded murder. What I am saying is that the shooter did not do anything wrong until he pulled the trigger.
0 likesComplaining about someone deliberately parking in a wrong space and pulling a gun after being attacked is not illegal. I would probably do the same. What is despicable is the fact that he shot someone retreating.
My opinions would not change if the skin colours were reversed.
@Marielle Gonzalez I don't think you release how stressful a situation like this is. when the attacker took a step forward, that was probably the last thing his brain processed.
0 likesThat being said, brandishing the firearm was appropriate because he was on the ground with no means of escape, however, he should not have shot once the attacker took a step back.
At the end of the day, the shooting was not justified, and manslaughter would be the correct charge
I mean the dude ran over there and pushed him hard enough for him to hit the ground, over a conversation. If you on that type timing be prepared for anything people will defend themselves to the fullest
0 likes@Xavi If you view the situation as a man pushes someone to the ground and gets shot, your framing the situation incorrectly. nobody is defending the shooting, but pushing someone to the ground from their blind-side is assault and could be lethal if they are unable to break the fall with their hands.
0 likes@Biggie Smalls Nah, taking it to 100 is pushing him and immediately closing the distance to stomp his head in... or sucker punching him. You don't push someone to the ground and stand and wait for a reaction 'cause you want to kill them.
2 likesThe victim shouldn't have went straight to pushing him, but you're acting like they're both as bad as each other when the shooter is much worse. He didn't need to pull that trigger and he knows it, he DID have ample time to make the decision. He didn't draw, aim and immediately fire - if he DID, that would have been much less damning than pointing the gun long enough to see that the guy is unarmed, moving away and still pulling the trigger.
Poor little man isn't going to have his gun with him if someone pushes him in the chow line while he's serving those long years in prison and I bet he won't be mr. big balls ready to start arguments over dumb shit without it either, will he? He'll just hand over his pudding and say "please don't hurt me!" 'cause he's not a dumb guy, just a bad one that felt temporarily empowered.
Yeah especially considering how they said the information came out that in the couple years leading up to this he had already been in multiple other similar situations where he threatened people with a weapon. I think it said 2 of those incidents were women too
0 likes@Biggie Smalls pushing somebody has never in history been taking it from 0 to 100. Getting pushed on the ground is how 11, 12 year old kids fight. Pulling out a gun and right then and there because it happened to you, and then shooting the person who did it to you is taking it from 0 to 100
0 likes@Wooden Monkey so if the wife shot this guy to death because she thought her life was in danger, you’d be cool with that, right? Don’t be a hypocrite.
0 likesI've carried for my entire adult life too...when you carry, you don't start trouble. You don't flip the bird in traffic, you don't puff your chest out and get in shouting matches, you walk away. Really, it's a good policy whether you're armed or not, but you never create a situation where you might have to shoot someone.
164 likesReplies (17)
ThaNK YOU!!!! man.
7 likesIf only this was a universal rule!
EXACTLY,mind your business,be polite & make sure you don’t make anybody feel threatened by your actions,unless you witness someone in REAL potentially fatal danger,don’t go waving guns around,that’s not going to end in a good way for anybody.Basic rules to live by
2 likesIt already kind of is, any concealed carry instructor worth a damn does their best to hammer it into folks' heads. You've got the means on you to elevate the stakes to the highest they can go, so don't voluntarily get into anything.
3 likesThis guy got into the minutiae, which I try to stamp down to the best of my ability when folks are looking for information. JCS got one thing wrong on the 21 foot rule, it does not require the person to be visibly armed. Now, if you're grounded and someone unarmed is coming at you, yes. You can shoot. You get fists or feet to the head, you can't roll with it, and you've only got concrete to stop the rearward movement.
This is the minutiae, and while it's true, it's not what a carrier should be actively thinking about. The only question that's truly important is "did you HAVE to?" This man didn't, and most people don't. Most situations, if they get to the point of a weapon being produced, end there. Unless the person is mentally deranged, too stupid, or just too hot to cease. The man in this situation was not one of those, he disengaged instantly, the man had no right to shoot. If he wanted to press charges on the matter, that would've been a reasonable course of action. The second the man stopped, he lost all right, legal and moral, to use force, deadly or otherwise.
And.. always obey rules. You don't know you might run into Karen one day. And when Karens or anyone confronted you or doesn't look right, even if he's being rude to your wife, don't be hero. You never know if the Karen is armed or mentally unstable.
1 likeAs others have said, any decent instructor will inform you of your duty to always de-escalate and avoid confrontation at all cost when carrying. This is why they say that an armed society is a polite society. Please go to a legitimate instructor and continue training with said instructor so you don't end up like this guy.
2 likesAustralian here. May I ask why you carry?
1 like@Eiraqucam Of course. I carry as a plan Z, when there's no other options left but to give up and let what happens happen. That's about the long and short of it.
4 likesFew times in my life, I've had random violence spring up around and towards me, I was lucky enough to talk my way out or otherwise remove myself from the situation intact, but it just as easily could've gone the other way. I've had to call the police before, and by the time they arrive, whatever is going on has been done and over with.
Honestly, though, I think the biggest thing to understand is that it's really not an active thing. I've heard the same from locals, not just folks in other countries. "Why do you carry a gun to *?" or ever. When I leave the house, it goes in a secure holster, and it's on my belt inside the waistband of my pants.
Barring extreme circumstances, it just doesn't come into play, it's not going to go off, it's not going to FALL off. It's well concealed, so it doesn't play a role on any social interactions. It's just there. If all goes well, then the only time it's an issue is when you're a little too enthusiastic out to dinner, and you kinda wish it wasn't in your pants.
It's probably most apt to think of it like an Epi-pen. Unless something very bad happens, it's just one more thing you've got on your person. I remember a girl I had recently started dating at the time asking if I really thought I was gonna need it while we were out grabbing dinner, told her that if I thought I did, we'd be getting delivery instead.
I thought that the video is the most disturbing thing, but the comments oh boy. So many proud gun carrying people. It is like reading stories from a post-apocalyptic dystopia 😱.
2 likesYeah man I roll extra low key if I'm holding peoples souls in my magazine
0 likes@SavageGerbil Thanks for such a considered response. It's very foreign concept to me so it's great to hear first hand from people their rationale. Cheers.
0 likesAbsolutely
0 likes@Eiraqucam Any time, always happy to help.
0 likesEiraqucam American here and I am wondering why others do not carry? There are MANY crazed people out there who would love to harm a woman, sneak in my home and hurt/kill me and even my kids. There are countless stories out there where a woman has been raped and murdered in her own home and these stories will continue to happen as long as mankind exists. Sometimes, the children are even murdered aling with the mother. These types of scenarios occur much more often than many people realize. I read about this stuff because I want to remain aware and I am also curious as to how the minds of psychos work.
0 likesAnyway, when you see the things I’ve seen and have the knowledge I have, to know your life(or your kids lives more importantly)could be over in a second because you were unable to protect yourself, then you want to carry a gun. Just for protection. Or at least that’s the reason I have a gun in my home. It is under lock and key and behind a safe with a code. We also have one in a bolted down locked box beside our bed. My husband travels often at times and I will take full advantage of my right to protect myself and my loved ones.
I suppose men or women who don’t attract a lot of attention would t get as scared as I have been before staying home alone. I have had a man come into my home in the middle of the night years ago before we moved down to Tn. I had no gun then and luckily I am a very light sleeper because I have kids. I heard him before he made it to one of our rooms. He heard me on the phone with the police and likely saw the light from my phone. I heard him walk out swiftly and I ran to lock the door. To be honest, I was younger and more ignorant to what people are capable of doing to others back then. The cops took 40 mns to get to my home because it was in the middle of the night and the few on duty were on another call completely on the other end of the county. It was a terrifying experience.
With all that said, I would never ever get angry enough to shoot someone over something stupid like this fella in the video. I would absolutely be terrified enough to use a gun however in a situation where a man much larger and stronger than myself has broken into my home. I would unload on him without a single second thought.
I have a couple stories things that have happened to myself or a close relative that have caused me to feel the way I do about guns. I have a cousin who was married and had a new baby when they were young. A large man showed up one winter night to their home in the middle of nowhere. To make a very long story short, of my cousin hadn’t had a gun, he would likely be dead. The second time the police had to come to my cousins house that night, the man heard the sirens and ran off again only to be struck by a vehicle in the dark. One of his legs were ripped from his body. The police soon figured out who he was and it was found he had beaten his wife almost to death a couple miles down the road. He was trying to find a place to hide. He was out of it on drugs.
I simply don’t want to be a victim. That’s why most people carry. For protection.
@BS17 Your reasons are perfectly valid and truth be told, if I didn't live in Australia perhaps I would carry / own a gun myself. However, there is no justification for civilian gun ownership here and one thing that makes me feel safe in Australia is the fact that the "crazy" people you mention can't get hold of deadly weapons. Petty criminals can't get hold of them. Wannabe vigilantes like Michael Dunn can't. Truth be told, I feel bad for Americans that gun ownership feels / is necessary.
1 likeI disagree, deadly violence should be met with deadly violence we have a right to defend ourselves
0 likes@Eiraqucam I wish guns didn't exsist honestly. I just know how many are out there and a lot of them are in the hands of bad people. Also, smaller, older, and less physical people need something to equalize the force. To be honest I carry a large handgun because I spend a lot of time hiking and camping in the deep woods and I do not want to become dinner for a bear.
0 likes@Luc welcome to reality
0 likesI can't believe he's tryin to use "the camera wasnt hd" as his defense. It only took one time of watching it to see exactly what happened. It was more than clear enough
181 likesReplies (2)
LOL yup. He's like ahhhh... i got nothing... this guy literally sentenced himself already.
7 likesThe defense must use everything in their arsenal
1 likeMichael seems like the ROTC kid who treated highschool hallways like an Iraqi warzone
3472 likesReplies (49)
Yesssssss that's exactly it.
69 likesYes, the kid who grew up watching way too many military documentaries
130 likes@A K With no actual service to speak of! Complete joke.
79 likesSo basically here's SpongeBob
5 likesI know, usually those kids become cops
40 likesOh that's perfect
1 likelol accurate and concise. I've met a fair few of these types and was never able to describe it so well.
16 likesAgreed. As a former US paratrooper, I've ran into a few wannabes like this. They don't have the intelligence, courage, or mental stability to make it past Basic (if they can even get in) so they adopt the slang (poorly) and become firearm fanatics. I'm an 11B combat vet and I don't even see the need to own a sidearm. These guy's are dangerous because they're a sad combination of abject fear and self-hate.
95 likesOf course he is. He’s the guy who carries and envisions he’s gonna be some hero vigilante when he’s really just a trigger happy misfit itching to shoot someone. Can’t believe he didn’t become a cop himself.
30 likesHe's the hallway monitor who aspired to be a cop but could only make it to security for a mall parking lot.
10 likes@06hatter Direct your anger to the real enemy, the government
6 likes@Angie T look up the iraq winter soldier testimonials please
0 likesUnironically living, "You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself be the villian."
2 likes@Activate Kruger guy thinks he's FBI
0 likes@3VILmonkey thank you for your service!
4 likes@3VILmonkey Well, my grandfather served and owned a sidearm, he got from a German who didn't need it anymore in southern France in the summer of 1944. But it was more of a showpiece.
4 likesAnd walked about in his grandfathers camos and with head band just like frog brothers in lost boys flick
1 like06hatter LOL. Feel better?
1 likeC. Elizabeth You’re welcome.
0 likesAlienated TV I’m not saying it’s bad to own a sidearm. Especially because your grandfather was highly trained by the military so he at least respected it unlike this guy who obviously just wanted to kill someone.
4 likessafnhuo Thank you for sharing your story and I’m glad you beat him up. He needed a wake up call. Guys like that drive me absolutely crazy. Sort of like guys like 06hatter who call people names, promote lies about soldiers in YouTube comments and are probably Chinese government finger puppets.
1 like@3VILmonkey lol. We'll put. You said it better than I ever could. I met a hugely overweight, 6'5" diabetes ridden ex-bouncer who "had to" carry for his "protection." Would walk around scanning the area like he was in the middle of a conflict zone. He worked as a mall cop. Absolutely everything was about drama. Dude could make a simple woman shoplifting sound like he was out punching artillery with his bare hands in order to save his platoon. So freaking sadly amusing to watch.
4 likes@Angie T grow up. There is no boogie man under your bed called "the government." There are many good people doing everything they can to ensure this nation keeps running smoothly and is safe from predation by enemies, psychopaths and/or liberals.
3 likes@06hatter They need to have that in order to break it "properly" and shape it into the much revision needed version of a soldier the U.S. wants for their military.
0 likesTo clarify, I say "much revision needed" because the type of soldier they cultivate is easily susceptible to becoming the [Complete Obedience] type and or the [Control First] type. There's possibly other types, and let's not even mention the myriad of delusions or warped ways of thinking that can culminate during or after a battle situation.
LMAO. I remember that guy from ROTC.
1 likeYou never had a amnesia bruise ?
0 likes@3VILmonkey Thank you! I live in a liberal bubble and I need to read something from a person who has had to use a gun.
1 like@3VILmonkey Of course there's a need to protect yourself. It's a dangerous world out there sometimes. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it. I was one of the few women that made 0311. We've seen the shit. Your hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
1 likeNatalia Kruschev Congrats on making it to Infantry. I met a female 1st Lieutenant with a Ranger tab a couple of weeks ago at Bragg, btw. Even through her BDUs, I could tell she was cut. I’m sure you’re aware how ridiculously hard Ranger School
1 likeIs
@3VILmonkey Ranger School is difficult. I heard they lowered standards for some women, and that pissed me off. I had to meet the standards. I earned the right to have my MOS. Good to know there's a few out there who make the cut like they should be.
2 likesI wanted to go for Marine Force Recon, but then I got married to my wife and she had our kids through sperm donation, so now I'm just Missus Dad. Gonna be buying the boy his first rifle soon and taking him hunting.
AliEvaMari 😂😂😂😂
0 likes@3VILmonkey Let's hope for two things: They'll be able to Ranger up if the time comes, and that we never get to a point where they need to Ranger up. I've met more anti-war people in the military than I have in civilian life. And that's a good thing. It means we have boots on the ground who are smart. They know when to shake hands and when to pull a trigger.
0 likesYeah without knowing all the facts that's my impression
0 likes@06hatter MiLiTaRy BaD
0 likes@Natalia Kruschev This is the cutest fucking story I have ever read in a YouTube comment. You seem like a really good citizen, let alone a good parent. Congratulations on getting where you are now, I know I couldn't do most of what you did.
1 like@GregK terrifying thought
0 likesI didn't even treat the Iraqi warzone like an Iraqi warzone. LT found a hedgehog and we named it Sonic.
0 likes- An actual war story
*JROTC. They're the obnoxious ones. ROTC is in college, and from my experience at least, they're much more chill and not all "wannabe" or whatever.
0 likes@Focused Future ROTC is for people who actually want to be in the Army, not for people who like the idea of being in the Army for the sake of boosting their ego
1 like@Aidan Cone yea, that's exactly right. Dudes in rotc are like regular people who just happen to want to be in the military. JROTC people are like the "you're disrespecting a future US army soldier" kid 😂😭
0 likes@3VILmonkey do u get to parachute a lot. Must be nice just free falling and parachuting
0 likesHe does not represent our program if so
0 likesJust you wait until we have space force rotc kids or guardians in training or something.
0 likes@GregK And get married to the rude popular girls that all become nurses for some reason.
0 likesNew a dude who would practice reloading animations of guns while just sitting in class with his hands. He looks genuinely insane.
0 likes@Shwilliebum Stephen mcdaniel
0 likes@safnhuo ok sure you did, kid with the anime profile picture
0 likes👍😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
0 likesThis is a sad thing that happened , it breaks my heart for his family,
0 likesBut you just made lol , I needed that 🤣
Yet again, a small dose of “minding one’s own business” goes a long way
444 likesReplies (5)
People want to play god themselves smdh
7 likesSpoton.
2 likesThat is true. At the same time it would have been just as easy for her to park in a legal spot.
7 likes@Jmac Playsball Mind your own business.
0 likes@Jmac Playsball is a honest mistake that shouldn't have lead to the murder of her husband
1 likeits insane how avoidable all of this was!! none of this needed to or should have happened! so sad
191 likesReplies (26)
The guy was looking for a fight. It was clearly established this would have been his 5th attempt in so many years of his road rage antics, pulling his gun on people. This time he had the perfect excuse.
23 likesIt was a bit of a dick move to park in the only disabled parking spot, he shouldn't have got so confrontational towards the mother, the father should not have tried to calm things down by pushing him before talking to him and the guy just took it way too far. This whole thing could have been avoided if everyone involved wasn't petty in their own way. (Of course the defendant was the worse though and it's good he's locked away)
26 likesBarber Dee Right? Don't park in handicap spaces
5 likes@Tomasz Losinski
3 likesIts easy to be wise after the event.
An asshole, an armed asshole at that, was in his own world managing his hatred n venting it upon someone who absent minded but harmlessly parked a car full of her family in a disabled spot among many other empty parking spots.
That family was also in its own world, minding their own business n looking after themselves, nobody had any right to interrupt them so its understandable that the father would react physically.
Not only is tha world we live in politically charged it is fulla creeps n perverts, any man in any country who reacted the same way would be forgiven for doing so.
It was a fucked up situation.
Its the price of freedom.
Tragic events n misunderstandings happen.
@Billy Batson
4 likesThe parking lot was all but empty, the parking spaces beside the disabled space were just as advantageous to anyone needing a disabled place, nobody deserved to be interrogated by an armed psycho imitating a police officer let alone gunned down in front of their children because of it. Also the video stated that the disabled space isnt clearly marked.
The driver was in the car, I assume if a disabled persons car pulled up needing the space & it was explained to the parked driver that she would have moved, at the very least she would deserve to be asked before justifying the killing of her children's father in front of them just because she parked in a vaguely marked disabled space.
@Zeon Eons This is why diversity doesn't work in my opinion. Different people have different genetics. White societies are high trust. They get pissed when you break the law. This high trust is what keeps the value of all white neighborhoods so high, clean, and quiet. African societies do whatever they want. Survival of the fittest. This is a clash. It doesn't work. The African clearly had a melt down over being confronted for doing something he was not supposed to do. Africans believe in "mind your own business" "or else". Diversity is a failure.
5 likes@Zeon Eons Yea this guy is pretty racist lol
6 likes@Zeon Eons Everybody involved should have handled it better. Baby mama couldn't be bothered to park legally. And she let a disagreement over her shit parking turn into an argument and eventually get the police and morgue involved. Baby daddy saw an argument and let that be his excuse to escalate to violence. Nobody had touched anybody else till he stormed out and made things physical. Now she's a single mom and he's worm food. And our guy here in the video, he made somebody else's crappy parking job his business, let it turn into an argument that turned physical, and ended up in the slammer for it.
4 likes@giantpune If only he hadn't parked face forward in an illegal parking spot himself.
0 likesIf only he hadn't gone and confronted the passenger, once he noticed her in the car with her kids. If only he hadn't been looking for an excuse that day to finally pull the trigger. His 4 other attempts had failed in escalation over the years.
The guy is now jail bait and ripe for the picking. 20 years to think of his wrongful choice to fire his weapon.
@Zeon Eons I'm not disagreeing that this guy was just waiting for something like this to happen. My point was that everybody involved acted with their ego instead of thinking. They all 3 wanted to be right and assert their dominance. Police the parking lot, park wherever the hell they want, pick a fight with strangers, push over strangers. And all 3 of them lost a lot that day. We can acknowledge and learn something from all of their mistakes. If any one of them would have acted like a grownup that day, they all 3 would have gone home.
2 likes@giantpune Hindsight is a wonderful thing. So is the human condition. What if buts and maybes play second fiddle to the reality now.
0 likesAs soon as he pulled his gun out he had time to stop. He didn't. That's where he lost any sympathy and a court defense.
@Zeon Eons Its reality for them now. The rest of us watching at home can learn from their mistakes. I'm not suggesting any of them can do squat about it now. But maybe it helps somebody else see what can happen when you act as stupid as they did that day. They let some trivial little thing escalate and snowball and it ended up hurting everybody.
0 likes@giantpune People won't learn from this though. Some will react in all sorts of ways. Some hate confrontation regardless.
0 likesUnless they are good at suppressing their anger. If someone was hanging around my family like that, i'd be pretty fucked off myself.
Would i be more wary now after watching that incident? Yes, but in a couple of weeks i'd forget all about it if i was in a similar situation.
I am not saying he was right to shove a guy to the ground but the reaction that followed was extreme violence that the shooter could have easily avoided IF he chose to do so.
You definitely have a point no ones blameless in any of this and lessons can be learned on both sides. Dont park in handicap spaces, Dont play cop, Dont shove someone before even exchanging words with them, and finally Dont shoot an attacker that is clearly backing away which now neutralizes the immediate threat. It was the perfect storm an angry gun toting vigilante meets hot headed father. No one wins.
0 likes@Zeon Eons But people are unpredictable... obviously shooting him in the chest is a massive overreaction. but had he simply walked in front of him and said: "what the hell man?" then he would still be breathing today. The best way to get out of a dangerous situation is to not be in the situation in the first place.
0 likes@Trusspike15 That would mean something but given his previous history (4 attempts pulling his gun on people, including a young mother) the argument would have escalated.
2 likesThis still comes back to the time he pulled his gun out and paused for 2.5 secs. While all this time observing the other guys actions. Which was one to flee. He shot him regardless. People may be unpredictable but I don't hear of many people dying in car parks cos some random person decided to be a traffic warden.
You can say it's an overreaction but he fully intended to kill him.
@Zeon Eons hes not innocent if he attacked the guy
0 likes....yup. truly.
0 likes@Billy Batson ....doesnt deserve THIS...FOR PARKING IN WRONG SPOT. STOP, REALLY.
2 likesfacts
0 likes@tari813 but the point is that it still got him killed.
0 likes@TWON The point is that Drejka shouldn't have been policing parking spots. If he didn't kill this guy he probably would have killed someone else.
0 likesTotally agree!!
0 likes@J. Doe The white guy should have minded his own business and none of this would have happened.
0 likes@Caleb There is plenty of data and evidence but it is all suppressed because it will destroy the narrative of being able to weaponize them to create social chaos, to usher in the new world order. Ever hear of "The Father of DNA" you know the nobel prize winner. Expert in real science DNA. Well he disagrees with with you with facts and data, MRIs', measurements of grey matter. The "problem" is not that they are differences. the "problem" is in denying it because it prevents us from being able to have open dialog to develop solutions. Lookup James Watson, discoverer of the double-helix. When you get beyond the millennial cultural marxism and dig down into the science come chat. People are different and that's fine. It's not fine when problems are not addressed.
0 likesYes
0 likesHe was 100% sure he was getting away with this on self defense grounds
110 likesfucking force multiplier lmaooooo
0 likesGood stories but the constant interruptions make these a bore to warch....
0 likesThis dude looked for it. He had the time of his life. You can tell how proud of himself he was when he acted it all out for the detective.
133 likesTo see his father fall dead in front of his eyes, the child is scarred for life.
1003 likesReplies (35)
all over something so petty too. it’s wicked. i saw my fathers body the night he died n never got the imagine out of my head. can’t imagine how much worse that would be if it had been murder. those children will NEVER forget that shit and the man responsible aint even sorry
82 likeshopefully he was young enough to not have conscious memory
26 likes@andoy gump If they wrre all under the age of 6, then maybe.. But it can still cause underlying mental issues even if they dint remember what happened.
19 likeshe would have left anyway lmao
6 likes@sophiaa Ew
2 likes@sophiaa Lol I know
0 likes@Emily Gendreau ok
0 likesWatch As that becomes a villan backstory
0 likes@Morgan Freeman Yea nevermind that he saw the gunshot, his father fall unconscious in front of him as he bled out, none of that counts towards trauma 🙄
14 likesOver a freaking parking space
4 likes@Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Thats a bit harsh
1 likeSadly, this seems to be a pretty common occurrence with children of all ages being a witness.
0 likesWorst part of this whole case honestly.
0 likesHe should of have minded his business 🤷♂️
1 likeHopefully he learns not to violently throw strangers on the ground.
1 likeI just found my father face down in a pool of blood. I'm 50. I don't know if I'll ever get over it. I can't imagine what that would do to a child.
1 like@sophiaa cringey and disrespectful to post on a comment about a young child watching his father murdered infront of his eyes
1 likeThe child won’t remember that
0 likes@FFk iTaze are you that child? kids can remember trauma i remember trauma from when i was 5 so its not unfeasible for that child to remember that
0 likes@Razor Gray Listen Mr. Razor, .. did you talk to the kid? Do you know if he knew or not? I didn’t think so, I’m just stating facts and it looks like a weeberboi like u isn’t liking it
0 likes@Razor Gray you’re completely out of your mind
0 likes@Morgan Freeman im a women so miss and tf you on about, im saying kids CAN remember that shit and unless you are that kid you cant speak for him its that simple, litrally says he collapsed infront of his childs face
0 likes@Razor Gray I’m saying he didn’t die in front of him, what’s so complicated, and congratulations would you like earrings? Or maybe a 6 piece?
0 likes@Morgan Freeman explain how stating that kids can remember trauma is out of my mind, yore clearly dence
0 likes@Morgan Freeman how could a child comprehend if he was dead or not if he collapsed in front of him covered in blood
0 likes@Morgan Freeman I don't think you understand that if someone collapses in front of someone covered in blood and his motionless they look dead I've witnessed it
0 likes@Razor Gray it clearly states he didn’t die and right how could he comprehend it I don’t know where you’re getting at but I got a snickers, here
0 likesI feel for that child. I was 12 when I saw my 4 year old brother get run over by a truck and saw his body all the blood etc. I'm now 30 and there is not a day I don't think about it and see the imagine clear as day. The kid will remember that unfortunately 😔
0 likes@sophiaa Stop spamming your link...nobody cares and if you insist on continuing to do so. At least have the balls to turn on comments so people can tell you how they really feel.
1 like@Emily Gendreau I have a very strong memory of something for the last time over 25 years later. I was only 3 years old but I remember the back seat of the cop car. I remember the blood. The bits of teeth. I dont think that goes away.
0 likes@Zachary Joubert I cant speak from experience so I appreciate you sharing yours. I hope your doing well, and I hope I didnt offend
0 likes@Emily Gendreau no no I wasent offended. I just hope those kids are okay.
0 likesbet he taught his kid a final lesson
0 likesHonestly so sad :(
0 likes@Tsunayoshi Sawada Yup the lesson to be learned here is dont randomly assault people over words because you never know what kind of crazy ur fuckin with. He didnt deserve to get shot over this but the rule is play stupid games win stupid prizes, unfortunately this guy won the jackpot of that game life over.
0 likesThird Michael on this channel 😬
0 likes" just so you know the guy you shot died"
42 likes" ok thank you for telling me that I did ask" So much empathy and remorse. Just wow.
Replies (1)
sbluewoody same thing I thought
0 likesthe one video on this channel… come on man
0 likesImagine shooting someone point blank in front of their family and being like, "owww, I can't shake with this hand."
1899 likesReplies (51)
wasnt point blank but still you got a point
8 likes@kaz bonked u
100 likes(of a shot, bullet, or other missile) fired from very close to its target.
"the bullet was fired at point-blank range"
@Lucas Duenez Now he gonna say that definition came from the media
51 likesImagine pushing an adult to the ground like some child. Who knows what that man could’ve done if he was willing to physically shove a person down over a parking altercation. Both sides acted idiotic and an idiotic outcome occurred
55 likes@SOLOWECR while I agree that the dad could have asked first what was happening, this man was harassing his wife . You don’t know wtf that guys up to. If I saw someone harassing my partner I would be ready to protect them. A shove doesn’t justify murder to any degree and trying to equate them is absolute bs.
139 likesI don’t own a gun but my brother and dad are huge gun nuts but they’re VERY vocal about gun safety first and trigger discipline. Shooting should not have been the immediate response. Honestly this guys biggest fault was irresponsible use of a gun.
@Athena Familar no his fault is walking up on someone and made a huge issue of something that wasnt his fight. Nothing would have happened if he would have just went about his day and this is coming from someone that is disabled AND carries a firearm. What got him convicted was how he told misinformation after that fact. Depending on how he told his story or shut his mouth lawyered up and if he had said I was in the fear of my life after a violent push, things might have gone different. Of course the case went nuclear and into orbit based on how present day is when a white guy shoots someone.
16 likes@SOLOWECR Shooting someone who backed away after you pulled out a firearm is unjustifiable.
59 likes@Lucas Duenez it was not point blank. very close is different from point blank. Otherwise you would just say very close. lol
1 like@SOLOWECR ah yes. a shove justifies murder. good thinking!
44 likesImagine asserting yourself into a situation and pushing a guy for no reason. Joggers.
5 likes@Athena Familar Unfortunately he has to live amongst savages who push a guy because they have low impulse control.
6 likes@HLLDY you don’t think a man should intervene if his wife is getting screamed at?
13 likes@Justin Ferguson really? Because it looks like they're pretty interchangeable.
14 likesI think we've established you shouldn't go around shoving people (not tackling, like this fool suggests. Where tf did this guy play football?). But when there's an imminent potential threat to your (wife/gf) AND your young children, you can see why things escalated. It doesn't justify a shove, but let's say husband/bf doesn't quite make it outside: now let's say gf/ wife was as confrontational as shooter suggests, after all she did get out of her vehicle. So if things had gone another way, what if gf/ wife were to be the pusher? Who's to say shooter wouldn't have popped her? With the benefit of hindsight, it seems reasonable to suggest, especially considering shooter's history, that he was waiting to use his firearm. It seemed to be the only reason he had confidence aggressively addressing someone about a goddamn parking spot at "HIS STORE." Obviously husband/bf wasn't privy to all this info, but again coming into a situation where your significant other, and by default your children, is being confronted by someone who clearly sees themselves as at the very least equal to law enforcement, including packing heat, you can see why bf/ husband responded. Not that it was the smartest maneuver, but pretending a shove that led to a scraped elbow and a point blank shot that led to a death are equal (cause some ppl still believe in eye for an eye) is ludicrous. Prosecution spelled it out perfectly, and y'all still confused.
@SOLOWECR a push is childish. I push my siblings for breathing on concrete. That’s nothing to shoot about.
10 likes@HLLDY He shouldn’t have pushed him but it doesn’t justify the shooting.
6 likes@Arek Imagine being childish enough to assault someone because they're arguing/yelling at a woman.
1 likeI can’t can’t imagine that at all
0 likes@Athena Familar how was he harassing? The father didn't know what was going on, his wife could have done something seriously bad and he would still have assumed her innocence. He attacked the man without absolutely any reason in a really agressive way, it's obvious he would have continued if the guy didn't pull his gun. While I think the shot was unnecessary and this guy knows it too, I understand where he's coming from.
3 likes@Kratos510e still he shouldn’t have shot him just because he pushed him. The only time it’s justified to shoot someone is if your life is literally in danger and it wasn’t just “a women” that was his wife and his kids were in the car
4 likes@Hannes_MLBX it is as the point they made in the video. He was doing this activity knowing that it may lead to confrontation. It was none of his business to go up to the person in her car. If he had an issue he could have told the store manager to deal with the situation. Also I don’t know where you get the impression he would have continued. He already shoved him to the ground, dad wasn’t looking to pummel the guy
3 likes@Peter Vansan The cop screamed at a woman over a parking spot and shot her husband over a shove, but yeah, the victim was the crazy one. The fact people like you can drive and vote is the reason why our country is doomed to always be the laughing stock of the world
6 likesImagine blindsiding someone because you parked illegally and the dude you hit was packing. oh wait, he cant imagine
3 likesthat now nvm!
@Dr. Vedlkin Lmao “blindsiding”. He shoved him and then immediately backed up, he didn’t have a weapon and he certainly wasn’t out to fight the man. The fact that you jump to such manipulative and emotive language to try and label the victim of murder as responsible for their own death makes it clear that you are not defending the shooter out of any sense of moral character
6 likes@Athena Familar Yes I also absolutely agree with that point, something like that should be such a minor altercation with civilised people, but yeah you never know (for both sides). And if somebody attacks you that hard from a blind spot with absolutely no other reason but blind aggression, then it's only reasonable to assume he will continue. There's been many cases like that and I have experience too.
0 likesDepends on the situation
0 likesImagine losing you childrens father because you were in the wrong but wanted to argue about it instead of just moving parking spots.
3 likes@Dark Meme Magician Exactly
1 like@Gachabrain I don’t know about you but if I came out to see a man screaming at my wife I wouldn’t stop to ask questions
1 like@Sean Reilly that would be really stupid of you
1 like@Dr. Vedlkin yes, but this also doesnt excuse Michael Drejka of taking LARPing as a meter maid too far. But the woman was wrong to argue about it, the guy who died was wrong to physically Assault someone, and Michael was wrong for shooting someone retreating.
0 likesOnly Michael and the mother get to live with those mistakes though.
@Gachabrain interesting. I didn’t say anything about right wing in this comment. I said “next he gonna say this definition came from the media” which can be said from both, but is more used by the right wing side I can agree.
1 likeHe said it wasn’t point blank. The next person put a definition of it under, showing it’s wrong. I made a joke about it and now you’re accusing me of shit lol
@Sujbubby she’s not saying it’s justified I think it pretty stupid and unjustified and both parties didn’t do the right thing
0 likes@Sean Reilly there’s other ways to intervene you don’t have to get physical
1 like@Gachabrain replying to ur next comment: again, from a different perspective, most people find this pretty justified as what’s going on constitutes it in many’s minds. You’re right, he shouldn’t have pushed him, but that certainly is a viable reaction to finding someone POTENTIALLY (from his perspective) threatening or getting ready to cause harm to the people you love the most. Unfortunately we don’t know what went thru his head at that exact moment but I can say he did a wrong for the right reason, which is certainly justifiable in my and many’s opinions, but to each their own.
2 likes@Dark Meme Magician Agreed.
0 likes@HLLDY So shooting someone without a second thought isn’t pOor impuLse cOntROL?
1 like@Kratos510e imagine being cold blooded enough to shoot a man in the stomach because he shoved you because YOU started unnecessary conflict. After the "assaulter" stepped back.
1 like@SOLOWECR He was gonna stomp Michael, he pulled up his pants while walking toward him. It looks to me like he was going to assault him further.
1 like@Kingof Grim you'll beat the shit out of someone for them asking you to free a handicap spot you have no right being in? Disregard this case and who sounds ignorant now...
1 like@❤️🔥 yes this is true but shoving someone to the ground for asking someone to move out of a spot they had no right or need to be in is unjustified as well
1 like@Kingof Grim it's called diffusing a situation...its what more intelligent people do; however, if you're parked in a handicap spot, and your wife is a chicken head squacking...chances are the husband isn't too bright either.I guess grandma has one less mouth to feed at her house.
1 like@Joshita it took more than a dozen comments...but there it is! You won the 'call someone a waycist prize!' Race card co,ment officially pulled people. 1st place goes to....
0 likes@destrocrimson bet you’ve pushed someone before. also bet you’ve started a fight before. yet still blaming the dead man 😞 what is wrong with you? do you actually think that mans actions justified murder in front of his family?
0 likes@Hello-Again man you’re so triggered 😂😂😂. The guy was found guilty, sorry you lose. Damn it’s funny how mad you people get.
0 likes@kaz bonked u it wasn't far enough for the bullet to drop so yeah it was point blank range
0 likes@❤️🔥 It's also cowardly.
0 likes@stephen shivery damn. Not only did you not read my comment, but u also just over exaggerated it, saying the man was beat up….
0 likesHe was SHOVED YALL
If he was not busy yelling at the wife he left wouldn’t even have fell to the ground, still pulled his gun probably, and coulda been way worse
@stephen shivery and also still, ur talking about a family parked in a handicap space for a few minutes.
0 likesWas it right? Not exactly
Does it effect absolutely anyone? 99/100 times no. And I’m sure if a handicapped person came by they’d move but i digress
@SOLOWECR ones a physical confrontation of the lowest caliber. Yeah starting a physical confrontation is not good, but all he literally did was push him over, that's something a fucking primary schooler does, worst case this guy gets a bruise. His response was to reveal a gun and then start shooting, not even showing it as a threat, he goes trigger happy. One was slightly stupid but understandable, the other was absolutely fucking nutty and not understandable in the slightest
0 likes@Kingof Grim "🐑 i swear you people will let the media tell you anything these days. hell i bet you think gay people should be allowed to live too dontcha ya communist"
0 likes@HLLDY not all of us are weak beta soyboys who won't fight for a loved one being screamed at by a complete stranger.
0 likesIf someone screamed at my mom, I sure as hell would have pushed him too.
cant say i feel bad for him. he knew wtf he was doing at every step of that situation. sure he didnt start yelling at her because he was looking for a reason to kill somebody, but he was 100% looking for trouble and couldnt wait to have a situation that he could reasonably claim that pulling his gun and firing was within his rights.
188 likesReplies (8)
I don't feel bad for anyone at the scene. 3 people had plenty of time to prevent this from happening.
7 likes@M H THEY DID have time to react and that is why he is serving time. He waiting until AFTER the victim started retreating before he fired.
1 likeHe would have got off if it wasn't for the video showing the delay between him falling, pulling his gun, and shooting.
6 likesIronically had he drawn and fired far faster he would have been OK here
It’s amazing all of you knew what his motivations were. Y’all should have been at the trial to testify and let the court benefit from your super powers.
2 likes@Bbfishman - Sure buddy. It’s called jumping to conclusions based on your bias. You have zero evidence of his intentions.
4 likes@Stephen Tumlin You don't go up to people and start trouble, while having a concealed firearm, and not plan on trying to use it in some way.
4 likes@FullMetal_ - Maybe YOU don’t, but you have no evidence that he thinks the same way. You’re simply speculating.
1 like@FullMetal_
1 likeYou don't go park on a disabled spot when you're not disabled either, nor make a big stink when someone verbally expresses their objections too that, nor push that person over because of it.
But he shouldn't have shot him.
It is sooo annoying to see this wannabe fake his injury - grunting, and moving slow 🙄🙄🙄 ugh.
1 likeHis reaction to him dying was emotionless. That’s bad for his defence.
445 likesReplies (19)
my thoughts exactly. no remorse at all...
31 likes@Robo Sushi especially when you know several children will now be fatherless
25 likesI agree. Most people would devastated if they discovered they had taken another human life, even if they felt it was in self defence. Especially if you killed a man in front of his wife and children.
42 likes@Dirk Gently
14 likesYou have no idea how the man in this video was speaking to the woman? He could have been incredibly rude, even violent.. Maybe the victim's behaviour was warranted? The whole basis of your point is questionable. The man in this video is most likely one of those closest racists too. Just waiting for an opportunity to shoot a black man. You have to be so weak to shoot someone over being shoved over.
@Dirk Gently being pushed to the ground does not warrant lethal force, his life wasn't in danger and the man was backing up. Thats why that lowlife is convicted with manslaughter.
12 likesNotice that, even in hearing that he'd killed Markeis, he managed to cast himself as the victim with the "Thank you for telling me, no one else would tell me".
4 likes@Dirk Gently I'm sure that'll hold up in court. Those exact words too lol. Instant acquittal
1 likeDirk Gently really? killing a man in front of his babies is completely justified by a shove? no.
1 like@Stiffilater Plays depends on who the jury is.
0 likesExactly. Even if the man were beating him while he’s lying on the ground, wouldn’t it make a person emotional and upset to know they killed someone?!
1 like@Dirk Gently you are just as sick as him
2 likes@myles rucker Yes, Myles, but you and your short little bus are even more special.
0 likes@James Snow 1) being rude doesn't justify a blindsided assault with lethal force.
0 likes2) Show us in the video where the shooter was being violent the woman who had committed typical black scofflaw behavior by parking in the handicapped spot.
The basis of MY point is right there in the video and the police report. YOUR point is on the top of your head.
@Mongo Del Lango And if you DON'T KNOW, you thereby have reasonable doubt, and must vote to acquit the shooter. OJ Simpson was CORRECTLY acquitted because the LA Police themselves had introduced reasonable doubt into the case by being unable to account for over a quart of blood. With a quart of their blood, I can make ANYBODY look guilty, even if they were documented to be living on the other side of the planet at the time.
0 likes@Mongo Del Lango It's very easy to see that the man was stepping away when seen from where the camera is located. However, when you're on the ground, and focussing on the front sight post of your weapon, and trying to get the proper sight picture -- aligning the fuzzy image of the rear sight with the sharp image of your front sight and overlaid on the even fuzzier shadow of your target, you don't notice movement towards you on the level of a couple steps towards or from you. Add in a HUGE adrenalin dump, which, among other things, causes tunnel vision, and you're unaware of target motion, unless it's lateral or vertical (forcing you to swing the weapon to keep it aimed at the target).
1 likeThe prosecutor also made a big deal of the fact that the shooter hit his target center of mass, and not "in the arm, or in the ankle" -- well, yeah, his target was less than 10 feet away. If his aim was so bad at that distance that he would hit his target in the foot, he wouldn't even qualify for a concealed carry permit (states want concealed carry holders to HIT THEIR TARGET, not people or things downrange past the target).
What you do know is that your head is only a foot above the payment, and is an EXCEEDINGLY easy target if the man who just pushed you down no wants to double-down and try to remove your head from your shoulders with a kick. In that position, one kick to the head could very easily be lethal.
I think what really got him wasn't so much what happened that day, but that he had brandished his weapon in 4 previous altercations in traffic. If it hadn't been for that, the cops would have said, "hands down good shoot" and told the prosecutor he would be nuts to waste the taxpayer's time and money trying the case. It's those OTHER 4 incidences (which probably weren't admissable in court as evidence, but nevertheless, would provide motivation the cops and prosecutor) which drove this case into the courtroom.
Prosecution wisely chose to prosecute for manslaughter rather than 2nd degree murder, because they never would have got a conviction on Murder-2.
I think JCS said in one of his police interrogation videos that some suspects just don’t show any emotion until after the fact, just like for example if someone’s mother dies some people cry immediately don’t some don’t, you’re not a murder you just behave differently.
0 likes@Dirk Gently key word there being 'could have'. More people are killed by guns than by a damn pavement. I've hit a concrete floor before (attacked etc) and i am still alive. I also know others who have too. I'm not excusing the guys actions. It's not good to shove people to the floor, I understand that and agree. I'd always be for talking things through with people as a first resort, before resulting to further actions.
1 likeHowever the comment, we are all replying to here, isn't about what he did, its about how he was completely emotionless to finding out he'd killed the guy over LITERALLY a bloody shove. He didn't stab him, he didn't pull a gun on him, he didn't fucking kick or do anything to him yet, other than pushing him to the ground after he was making such a scene with his wife (enough for him to hear, from within the store, and come out to see what was happening). And yes he MAY have ended up hurting him more, who knows, it never happened. But being hurt by someone still does not justify death. No sane minded person would be all 'ah okay, ah well, serves him right for pushing me'. only people void of empathy it seems.
@Dirk Gently 'Typical black scofflaw behaviour' That speaks volumes on you as a person. What a wonderful person you must be. Clearly an asset to society.
2 likes@Dirk Gently i did 70 in a 65 the other day, you gunna shoot me?
1 likeThe worst thing here is the cops having to act like his Madness is Sadness tattoo is cool
1585 likesReplies (14)
That tat was pretty cool and really clever tbh
45 likesIt was tho
4 likesThat wasn't just his tattoo, it was his autobiography.
26 likesMe through gritted teeth: “wow sweet ink”
53 likes@Proud Tobestraight Hey Michael!
15 likes"worst thing here"? Careful with your phrasing mate, a human being died "here".
24 likes@RealExony “Now I wasn’t talking about the actual incident of the shooting”
6 likes@Yoyoma I get you, it's just the way you phrased it that bothered me.
6 likesI think it’s part of their training; make the suspect sooo comfortable in the hopes they might get something out of his mouth.
14 likesImagine if they were rude from the very start causing him to fully shut himself down, saying only “i need a lawyer”.
This sentence made zero sense.
0 likesI’m not saying your mother tongue isn’t English, nor that you didn’t communicate perfectly clearly, I was solely throwing that out as a general consensus btw I totally agree with your sentiment lawl!
0 likes@alqaadi yesss it’s literally called the “Ego-Up technique” bahahha how ridiculous is that 😅
3 likes@patrick gorski it made perfect sense on first read... what do you need help understanding?
4 likes@RealExony yo dude it's a joke
0 likesWhy did they swab his DNA? What good does that do?
0 likesReplies (1)
1. Matching DNA from the crime scene and from the weapon fired.
2 likes2. For future reference if he ever commits a crime if he was let go due to a technicality or mistrial or on appeal or any of the other thousand loopholes in the American justice system.
I love how JCS's videos just end with the final facts of the case. It's tempting to implore others to "Like and Subscribe" and "Hit the Bell", etc. but ending videos this way seems much more professional and leaves you with a better impression at the end.
75 likesWow. I would have never expected that (the verdict). Sad. Your ability to positively assess a situation like this while you’re in it is impossible, same w/ recounting it afterwards. He really goes to jail for what he did… scary. Are we supposed to wait till after we received the second blow before we self defend and are we supposed to have abilities not possible for a human to possess in regards to positively access a situation while we are in it
0 likesReplies (1)
He shot an unarmed person....there was ZERO evidence of HIS life EVER being in danger bud.
2 likesIt's sickening how ready he was to take someone's life over the dumbest shit. I mean it's really disgusting. The man was not armed, and he stepped away when he saw the gun. There was no justification for shooting him at that point. I just don't understand how people do it. They must be wired completely different than me. This guy is what's wrong with America
621 likesReplies (26)
Exactly, it seems that he shot him as a sort of revenge for being pushed instead of defending himself. How entitled do you have to be to shoot someone for pissing you off
50 likes@kit fisto
62 likesEdit: The guy I responded to deleted his racist comments! I wasn't ranting over nothing lmao. Don't come for me!!!
Shut up dude. This guy, knowing he was armed and looking for trouble, instigated a fight over a parking spot, and then pulled out his gun at the first instance he possibly could and murdered someone on the spot. But somehow, the black guy is the 'impulsive buffoon' in the situation? That guy got 20 years in jail for what he did, because his actions were not justified. You are blatantly ignorant and racist, and you choose to ignore the reality that the color of your skin does not determine your choices. I am African American by the way, and I have never gotten into a physical altercation in my life. I can hardly fathom the idea of physically assaulting someone, let alone murdering them. It is not in my genes to do anything other than be human. You comment was really unnecessary
@kit fisto >black guy was impulsive for shoving man violently arguing with his wife
39 likes>white guy pulls out gun over impulse decision from being pushed
hm
@kit fisto Thank you for admitting that he wasn't justified in shooting him. You could have just said that without adding the ridiculously unnecessary racism, but okay. Have a great day
17 likes@kit fisto agree, good thing that impulsive buffoon got put down before endangering another human
1 like@Content Ganja good thing the shooter got arrested before endangering another human*
9 likesI regret that I can only hit the like button once and not more times. This guy IS what’s wrong with America.
3 likes@Cheong-San The Baddest Or you know, they were both in the wrong? Take race out of it for a second. One of them is definitely more in the wrong and a horrible person but there were two in this ugly dance. You don't put your hands on someone else at the least because you don't know how they'll react or what they'll do. It doesn't have to be a gun right in the moment, people can seek vengeance for what you thought was the smallest of transgressions.
1 like@kit fisto he may be black but I hate to break it to you black people are human beings so him pushing was a human response but I love your racism
3 likes@Cheong-San The Baddest you dont why he shot him, personally i would’ve been very angry if someone pushed me to the ground and stood over me. on the other hand i wouldnt argue with a female over a parking spot thats why its so hard to understand what hes thinking. he seems to be trying to get revenge for being pushed and shooting just because he has the shot, hes wrong. but i understand why hes angry.
0 likes@RunTheFade so you would've shot a person dead because they shoved you to the ground and you got angry? If you can't control yourself when you get angry you shouldn't own a gun.
4 likes@RunTheFade so you would've shot a person dead because they shoved you to the ground and you got angry? If you can't control yourself when you get angry you shouldn't own a gun.
0 likes@ShockanPlays i didnt say that dont talk to me if your gonna say stupid stuff like that
0 likes@Andrew Francis Especially when he was the one who provoked the entire incident. If he had minded his own business in the first place, none of this would have happened.
0 likesAmerica?
0 likesit's "The WORLD Chico... and everything in it"
Bruh handicap spot or not, you approach my vehicle, or my significant other’s vehicle, in a confrontational manner like that and start shouting in her face, that shove to the ground is the minimum that’s justified dude. If you can’t see that than you can’t be helped
3 likesLet me be clear, the overwhelming majority of Europeans are just disgusted with the american gun culture!
1 likeAnd I mean disgusted to the core of our beings. Nowadays you have more racist Nazis over there than Germany ever had and it is popular with about half of your population. It makes me happy, that in this case the perpetrator got 20 years in prison and hopefully he will get into more trouble there so he will never get back on the streets, because he does not belong there. He did this in cold blood in front of the family of the victim. He shot the father and protector of those kids in front of their eyes. Yes, the victim pushed him to the ground, but he was harassing his wife and kids and that is what protective men do, if they perceive you as a thread to their family. If the victim family would have been white and the shooter would have been black, he would have gotten life without parole! That is what is so fundamentally wrong with America. I just hate that culture so much, that I will never visit that country in my lifetime...
Well I am not making a comparison but this logic also holds true for Markeis as well . There was absolutely no reason to physically assault a person when all he was doing was having a verbal altercation . Lets remember that if anger can make you violent enough to hit a person then anger can also have an effect on the other party as well and you never know the degree of that effect .
0 likes@Jip Jackson I agree!
0 likes@Death2Boredom The person I was responding to (kit fisto) deleted their first 2 comments, which said something like, "The black man was unable to think rationally because he is an impulsive buffoon, not surprising because of his skin color". So what he said was very racist, I responded to that. I don't think any of them were right in this situation
1 like@Cheong-San The Baddest Oh damn, that's the worst kind of coward huh.
0 likesHow is being scared after someone attacks you "the dumbest shit"
0 likes@Brandon Driver I'm referring to the unnecessary altercation that HE himself created. Oh, so HE'S scared, after starting a fight with someone (with the knowledge that he was carrying) luckily for him, someone pushed him, so it was his time to murder them! The opportunity he's been waiting for his whole life. Yeah, it's fucking dumb
1 like@Cheong-San The Baddest he didn't start a fight though. He was talking to her, and her partner attacked him from behind
0 likes@avi the issue is a father come out and saw the mother of his child being harassed. Sounds like a case of little body white not knowing how to fight
1 like@murderbits Everyone saw the video. The victim pushed him (aware from the car containing his wife and kid) before backing away. No one was "baring down on him." 24:12 the officer even says as much.
0 likesYou literally sound as hysterical as the P.O.S shooter. What kills me is how you seem to think you're coming across as nuanced and it reeks of enlightened centrist who's proudly neutral on whether or not someone should have died over a parking spot. This psuedo intellectualism is more frustrating to me than trolls or out and out racists.
I guess you should think twice who you push in america
0 likesThere’s something ethereally beautiful about just minding your own damn business..
450 likesReplies (6)
Exactly.
12 likesI was tempted to argue this point, but I will follow your advice ;p
10 likesI mean. Tell that to the weirdos that aporoach me.
4 likesTrue.
1 likeliterally! bro is a top of the line buster.
1 likeYes but also maybe don't park in a handicapped spot. Also don't shove someone if they are just arguing. I'm not saying he isn't guilty, but verbal assault doesn't justify physical assault.
3 likesThis guy has created so many scenarios in his head before this incident. He wanted something like this to happen to justify killing someone to "defend" himself.
321 likesReplies (15)
To be fair, I've never met a guy who doesn't have these fantasies, they just never accelerate these scenarios. That's the difference. Why make a situation more hostile than necessary
4 likesI think besides that he was just looking for a situation like this. I agree. Not only he wanted a situation like this to happen he was looking for it
3 likesMaybe that is true, but push any stranger onto the ground in public and you should know you just created the chance you may be dead in the next few seconds. That's just life. Don't be stupid people. Buddy didn't need to shoot him, but get physical with anyone, you just increased your probability of dieing. When you have kids, you dont do that.
8 likes@Sean Winters Fantasize? Hell no I've never fantasized about killing anyone. Maybe you should look up the definition of that word -- "indulge in daydreaming about something desired". Maybe everyone has thought about such a situation but it is obvious from his background and prior incidents that he actively desired such a case. No one like that should have access to a firearm, and should probably seek therapy as well.
6 likes@Mottbox That's pure ignorance. It's obvious what he did and why he did it. You people tryin to argue his life was in danger are absolutely delusional..
13 likes@Mottbox Then you're arguing it....
4 likesIf you dont visualize, you won't win.
1 likeI wouldn't have shot the guy. But that doesn't change the fact that visualization is a valid tactic in self defense.
So many (all) trump supporters with guns are like this waiting for any opportunity as an excuse to use their gun
1 like@Dontbetreadin ^^^
0 likes@Sean Winters exactly, even in Michaels own words, he would have no reason to shoot him if he backed up or was stationary. I’m not defending Michael, but I think the man who shoved him over took a very stupid decision and isn’t blameless for what happened. Even though he didn’t deserve it, there’s tapped people out there and I really don’t understand that way of approaching situations.
2 likes🤡
0 likes@Sean Winters Not fantasize about rapists, murderers, or home intruders in the first place.
0 likesHe creamed his pants when this happened I swear
0 likes@Sean Winters Yeah, but while a lot of guys fantasize about being a hero. Not quite as many carry a gun, research exactly what they can get away with and walk around hoping they'll get attacked so they can use it. This is the type of guy who practices 'clearing' his house
0 likesfacts, he was literally feening for this moment, he couldn’t wait lol.
0 likesThis is horrific
0 likesI’m not over how a father was killed because of a ‘pet peeve’ and the murderer doesn’t think he didn’t anything wrong
93 likesReplies (4)
"..but as far events that could change, i cant think of any. No."
0 likesEven if it was justified how does he not feel sick knowing he killed someone? Soldiers kill people in war and years later still feel guilty so why isn't he sad?
2 likes@donny trumpster 😂😂😂 bro you’re so triggered. He murdered someone, was found guilty, and given 20 years, in one of the most trigger happy backwards states too. Sorry you lose 🤓
3 likes@Jenna Mattern All the veterans I know that have issues aren't from killing but the situations surrounding it. Like I know people messed up from watching "their guys" get chewed up by AKs but not be allowed to help because the shots are coming from a school house or not from killing 10+ people over 9 months but the 1 kid that got ran over during an ambush.
0 likes48:09 dude in the back... asleep?
0 likesWhat's really crazy is he doesn't see that he did something wrong.
494 likesReplies (18)
He really did go bop bop with the gun lol
6 likesBecause he didn't
12 likes@LordBattleSmurf according to his sentence I'd beg to differ.
39 likes@LordBattleSmurf yes he did. He kind of killed a man in cold blood.
47 likesNo he obviously knows he did something wrong, but his limited understanding of the law allows him to believe he might get away with murder.
34 likes@SOAPANDISHESFORSALE LEBANONCANADAboom 💥
1 likeHe's a mr.know it all
2 likes@SOAPANDISHESFORSALE LEBANONCANADA I think he understood what happened was bad and negative but I don’t think he believes he was wrong or what he did was wrong. But I do agree with you that he thought he’d get away with it due to his limited understanding of the laws. I think he believed he was within the law to shoot someone in that situation without receiving time.
0 likesI heard he got busted up in prison haha
1 like@No Homo I see your point, but you can't expect everyone to act the way you would. People react to high tension situations differently and some are more protective than others. You can make the argument that shoving the guy harassing your wife was excessive, but we can both agree he didn't deserve to lose his life over some idiot trying to be a tough guy because he had a gun.
2 likes@LordBattleSmurf I hope you don’t own a firearm let me break it down for you. You cannot kill someone because they put hands on you, if your life is in danger then you can do what ever it takes to stop the attacker. But physical harm does not relate to life endangerment.
6 likesI swear, these people will attack and claim they’re innocent and they wonder why no one else likes them 🤦♂️
1 like@Michael I bet you're fun at parties
2 likes@Michael he was attacked, yes. But this wasn't self defense at all. A warning would have sufficed, and it did suffice as the guy was already backing up. No need to shoot.
5 likes@Sxiller
0 likesDc. He fought back. Gg. Major W to wyte gang
@Michael The only one who fought back was the white man and that was after the black man had already surrendered and shot him straight for the heart , not even in the leg He went straight for the kill . There is no buts.
1 like@Sxiller
0 likesHe never surrendered, he stepped by one foot. In most cases, the attacker will run at the guy with the gun anyways. The threat wasn’t eliminated. I guess it’s easy for you to make such a life threatening decision on your armchair as for me, but you don’t know what you would’ve done if you were attacked in that position.
@Michael if your reaction time is as slow as taking 2.5 seconds to shoot, you shouldn't bear a firearm. that was no "heat of the moment" and stop with the bullshit "you dont know what you would have done in that situation" argument.
0 likesI love how he forgot his wrist was suppose to be hurt at several points.
711 likesReplies (5)
I was like DUDE, YOU'RE FORGETTING HOW TO ACT
36 likesThat's me when I'm actually in (slight) pain, I'm a wimp about the pain until I forget all about it because I get into whatever I'm doing, then I feel a twinge and start wimping out again.
13 likes@c99kfm then you’re not that hurt. Obviously not enough to make a makeshift sling out of your shirt 🤨
6 likes@Mariah _ Marzades Don't underestimate my wimpiness, the actual level of damage has nothing to do with my reaction to it. ;)
2 likes@luis I self-edited out a couple of worse terms than "wimp" from my original post, one of which was the term you just suggested. ;)
1 like"Not opinion. It's training."
1560 likesSays the retired tree-trimmer to the sheriff.
Replies (7)
Im a marine and he has no idea about escalation of force.. Once he drew his weapon he should have yelled get back if he kept coming then he could have shot in self defense and in the state of Georgia I dont know about florida because I know they have "stand your ground" but self defense is below the waist.
13 likes@Jason Cardwell Yah, Marine here too. Our ROEs are much more strict, even more so than civilian law enforcement. I cringe when I see Police handle a firearm. But even Florida laws you can only use lethal force in self-defense to prevent "grievous bodily harm or death" and being shoved to the ground does not meet that standard.
5 likes@Nicholas Feiock rm
0 likesA
Guy threatened people with a gun in four other incidents. Only training he ever got was on Xbox.
5 likesTraining videos are also available on this platform bud😂
0 likesnot like sheriffs get that much training regardless LOL
0 likesAnd Abbot thinks people don’t need training to handle a fire Arm. Lol.
0 likes“I should have called a lawyer” is definitely the right title for all of these videos
2161 likesReplies (14)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
3 likesmost...I don't think any lawyer could have helped War Machine. Which is still my favorite JCS video. But your point most certainly stands with the majority.
22 likes(and now I have I've got a brand new pair of roller skates stuck in my head again)
@Scott Kirby the little montage at the end of that vid 🤧 hit different
3 likesA "good guy with a gun" doesn't need a lawyer, he's oooobviously the hero in this story so he'll be tucked in bed, fast asleep by the end night, right? 😆
12 likesBetter call Saul!
7 likes@Martín exactly what I was thinking
1 likeIronically “Jeff” was the only one who played his interrogation correctly
11 likesFire alpaca pfp
1 likeFor fuckin real dude I don’t understand why everyone thinks they can handle these interrogations
6 likesMy thought exactly, that is the lesson that i could take from all these videos... just lawyer up when dealing with the police.
2 likesRight? Like I dunno (I‘ve never dealt with police in that kind of way before) but for me in this kind of situation to call a lawyer and keep my mouth shut would be the first thing to do.
1 likewhy are you copying comments for likes ? get a life
0 likesPrecisely hahahahaha
0 likes@Martín that guy is great!
0 likesThe fact that people will talk to the police after *shooting someone*, without a lawyer present is bonkers to me.
453 likesReplies (10)
The fact that people will shoot someone is bonkers to me.
80 likesYou've probably heard this before but narcissists don't think they need any help and are absolutely right in everything they do. It says a lot about his character that he threatened others with a gun.
47 likesEvery one needs a lawyer, even lawyers have their own lawyers
11 likesOnly a fool make any kind of statement without a lawyer present!
4 likes@Frank Paya does that include you?
0 likesWhen my dad shot my uncle (my dad was afraid my uncle was going to hurt us kids at the time [there's a long complicated history between those two that I don't want to get into]), point is, when my dad shot him, he went out to the front yard, sat down and waited for the cops. He admitted everything and cooperated entirely. He also felt really guilty about it despite the fact that it could have been considered justifiable. (Uncle also lived, I don't want to know what my dad would be like if he'd actually killed him).
2 likesYeah but this guy actually thinks he's like a cop. It permeates everything he does and the way he talks.
1 likeThat's Drejka in a nutshell
0 likesI could be out of the country when a crime happened with a bounty of camera footage to prove it and I’d still ask for a lawyer.
1 likeI'm glad they don't. That just gives us another great murder interrogation to analyze, chat about and rewatch. lol
2 likesThe fact that he thought it was a justified shooting is kind of scary..like, he's been carrying a gun for years and he felt if he got pushed he should shoot right away.
331 likesReplies (27)
One should not start a physical altercation and think the other won't escalate.
39 likes@Aiea Slippers Very true..I'm sure the man that pushed him liked his chances if their were no gun involved..People should assume the other person is crazy and will shoot. Need to avoid altercations.
25 likes@Alysha Lol!
3 likesAgreed. He decided that he would respond to any altercation with immediate lethal force when he packed it on him. Loaded, in a easily accessible holster, and possibly with the safety off, i might add. Walking through a unfamiliar neighborhood at night, in a high crime area. Then I can understand why you might want a gun. But quickly dropping in at a store he goes to everyday that is right near a main road, near his car, in broad daylight? That's just paranoid. If he goes around harassing a woman in such a aggressive way, it is inevitable that someone might stand up to him, and shove him away. Everything he did was escalating the situation, and he made no effort to find a non-lethal solution. I hope he won't go wandering around freely, pretending to be a cowboy for some time.
21 likes@Korey Paul The man with the gun was the one that started it, though. It looked like he may have hurt the woman if nobody intervened. Or at least that would be a reasonable conclusion to come to. Not really self defense if you start and escalate the conflict to something lethal or likely to cause (serious and not exaggerated) injury.
10 likes@Geek Freak Your point is spot on and very scary. So you park illegally and approach someone parked illegally, packing a gun just in case you don't get your point across without backlash. Scary.
5 likes@Aiea Slippers correct one should also learn justifiable force on force interactions and not carry a firearm otherwise :)
1 likesure though what's scarier is that so many people like this exist and they all own chl (ccw) and a firearm and have absolutely no clue about force on force interaction or the laws surrounding justifiable force.
1 likeHe could’ve atleast simply pointed it yes he was pushed / assualted but to point and shoot an unarmed man with his wife and children adjacent to him was just simply wrong. Disgusting this guy even thought he was justified in shooting.
6 likesAnton Chigurh asshike😂😂😂and you aren’t wrong it all just depends on the state law. Here in California is very liberal and strict which is why people like to say commiefornia.
1 likeCan we talk about the fact the guy walks out of the store, shoves someone so hard they hit the asphalt, without any degree of humanity or what most people would do and ask what's going on and tell the guy he's a pretentious fuck. Dude could have cracked his skull, had underlying health conditions, this could have been manslaughter the opposite direction easily. He shouldn't have shot him and his death is sad for damn sure, I hope his kids get counseling.
7 likesModerndaydrifter92 no shit sherlock dude hit the floor damn hard but to pull out a gun and start shooting? That’s not enough to take another human life especially infront of his wife and kids
3 likesModerndaydrifter92 this is a different scenario. That was his wife and kids that were being harassed. I’d do the same thing without thought if my family was being attacked.
1 likeBro, and with all the advancement we’ll have made by the time he gets out, he’ll be even more dangerous. Good thing ex-cons don’t have the right to carry.
0 likesAlysha Jenkinson have a box that says, “How much do you know about guns?” And if you check “I’m an expert,” then you can’t legally sell them the gun lol too cocky
0 likesKorey Paul I can see how it’s justified , pushing someone to the concrete like that could easily kill you
0 likes@ILikeKnafs No, that's not how it works...
0 likesG4H BARRETT eh not really man. Even if he actually legitimately feared for his life...did you not see once he saw the gun he backed off? There was a pause before he shot and you can clearly see the man backing up a few steps before the shot came out. Nothing justified about it
3 likes@SlitWristMisfit irl livestreaming was a mistake
1 like@Corey Ray He wasn't physically attacking anyone. He was being an asshole for sure and most definitely shouldn't have just shot the guy, but the guy just walked up and shoved him without even asking what was going on first. If you wanna fight the guy after that, go ahead, but you never know who you're dealing with. He could have tried to make the guy leave by getting in his face and telling him to fuck off before taking it to violence.
1 like@Aiea Slippers Ah yes, let's blame the victim.
0 likesThat mans been wanting to use that gun to kill someone his whole life. Was just waiting for the perfect "self defense" situation
0 likes@Geek Freak You can't carry a Glock with the saftey off because Glocks have no external safety. As long as nothing is inside the trigger guard a Glock will never go off.
0 likesHe should have just pulled his weapon, not fired it. Just the presence should have “deescalated” the altercation especially considering it appears the boyfriend was backing up. It never should have reached this point in the first place but...people be weird
3 likes@Lil Asthma Pump moral of the story being, Don't put your hands on other people and you won't have to worry about being shot.
0 likes@Lil Asthma Pump Yes. Again, don't put your hands on people. It's that simple. You can not be sure if the person you shove will defend with the same amount of force or excessive force.
0 likes@Bryant Sims If that's the moral of the story, than that seems to suggest it's justified to shoot him...
0 likes“I understand my Miranda rights” continues to talk without a lawyer.
3793 likesReplies (60)
Alex Carter amazing how many people do not understand the power of the rights they have, especially the 5th
92 likesTalking to a lawyer is only important if you're guilty
8 likes@Intrspace Wrong. Innocent people can often say things to incriminate themselves for no reason. Always talk to a lawyer
461 likes@Intrspace No not at all. Innocent people have gone to jail before and will go to jail again. People can legit be framed. People can be in the wrong place at the wrong time. People can be misunderstood and face extremely harsh penalties despite reasonable mitigating circumstances if they don't know how to prove them. Pro tip: Never consent to a field sobriety test even if you are sober. Many sober people fail them and are taken into custody. Always always do a breathalyzer if you are sober. A sobriety test does not prove you are sober, it can only give reason to believe you are under the influence. Similar concept to pleading the 5th and seeking lawyer.
195 likes@09Drdray glad I'm not the only one who pointed this out lol
26 likes@Хэтчбек умереть I honestly hate arguments like "Oh if you're innocent you have nothing to hide" and shit like that. its so ignorant and foolish
116 likes@Intrspace ....ever heard of Rubin "the Hurricane" Carter? He to used to think that only the guilty needed lawyers too. Until he was convicted of a murder he never committed. He served 20 years in prison. You need to read his book The 16th Round.
69 likesHe does not believe he did anything wrong. This was a big case.
13 likesQualified immunity..let em go.
0 likesEverybody understands their rights... but you’d be shocked at how many people think NOT talking makes you look guilty lol
19 likes😂😂
0 likesYet another example on why you don't talk to the police without a lawyer. Especially when you're innocent. And this man is innocent. More than that - he is the victim. And his lawyer did a bad job. And that's why more and more people are minding their own business and chose not to get involve. And our world and humanity goes to shit. "Divide and conquer."
9 likes@Intrspace Nope. An attorney's job is to provide roadblocks for the prosecution to prove that somebody committed a crime, so that we are sure beyond a reasonable doubt that they did it. No problem with an innocent person using that right that is afforded to them to strengthen the argument of the defense.
8 likes@Intrspace lol way wrong
2 likesIntrspace you are presumed guilty.
2 likes@Kangoshi The surveillance video, witness accounts and the killer's OWN account disagree with your summation. He is decidedly guilty. You can blame his legal council or anything else, but objective reality demonstrates otherwise. Just curious, what mechanism can we use to delineate your beliefs from delusions? Surely you care whether or not your beliefs comport with reality, right? Can you meet your burden of proof and exonerate him? I guess it's more comfortable for you to accept a grand conspiracy to divide and control the populace (which I'm not saying isn't happening at some levels), which this case somehow plays into, than to accept that this guy is demonstrably guilty as charged. Anyway, do share your independently verified, falsifiable and peer-reviewed evidence for "innocence" as well as your methodology for distinguishing fact from fantasy.
13 likesIntrspace Talking to a lawyer is the most important thing if you are innocent. What matters is how 8 to 12 people think about you, and the cops are trained to get you to trip up and accidentally lie. If you’re guilty as hell, it doesn’t matter. If you are innocent you NEED a lawyer.
10 likes@xebek Watch Rick's Gore initial analysis of the shooting. GoodLuckAmerica is his channel.
1 likewalter kersting Actually no. The prosecution’s job is a lot harder than the defense’s because you’re presumed innocent.
0 likesIt shocks me that so many of these interviews are made without lawyers!!!
5 likes@Kangoshi Just paraphrase Rick's most succinct piece of data that would exonerate this guy. Also, why hasn't Rick sent his datum to his council to instantiate an appeal?
1 likeMike Jones 1 in 4 or 25% of people that Project Innocence, who had DNA evidence to help prove their innocence were convicted because they didn’t invoke the 5th amendment.
5 likesArrogance is a helluva drug.
2 likes@Abraham Johnathan just curious, I take it you're referring to tiktok?
0 likesIntrspace Every single person should refuse to speak to a police officer without a lawyer. No matter what, period. There’s a reason you have that right, exercise it. These cops are not your friend, guilty or innocent.
5 likes@Biohazard 001 it shouldn't, that's why we're watching lol
0 likes@D Po Dead serious. And I'm straight white male, so I'm a racist by default. Or so left tells me every day.
2 likes@xebek Too much to "paraphrase". Trained police kill people with lesser justification and they're fine; when you decided to pull the trigger - it's almost impossible to reverse that decision in the next seconds; you don't give statements after an incident because they'll catch you lying, because in your mind you can see things different, like ask 10 witnesses what happened and you'll get 10 different stories; he didn't know if there was another attackers and he had a gun - they could've take it from him and kill him even though they wasn't armed, and there are videos of that, including when a suspect throw a brick at a police officer, took his firearm and killed him; etc.
1 likeYou need to watch many of Rick's videos to understand all of this and more.
@Kangoshi fuck the left, and I don't know you so I don't really think you're racist, but theres no fucking way you can genuinely believe this dude to be innocent lol
5 likesCorrine Vermette holy shit I went to amazon and looked and apparently the Nelson Mandela wrote one too
0 likesKangoshi what surveillance video did you see because like the narrator even pointed out once a gun was drawn, the man backed away which signaled in body language that he’s not wanting to escalate anymore and not be a threat, even with hands up like as if he’s a cop. Then after backing up with his hands which showed there was not a threat any longer, he still proceeded to pause a moment and shoot him in the chest. That’s innocent, then heelllllll the whole system of people convicted of domestic violence, abuse, or even murder should be let out, cause they probably didn’t have the witnesses, self-admittance, and VIDEO to prove it. 🤷🏻♀️
3 likesOne of tge few situations talking to them directly may be a better play.
0 likes@landofthelivingskies hurrican was guilty as fuck man, they just chose not to retry him after 16 years lmao
0 likes@walter white now there's a troll if I've ever seen one LOL. or, MGTOW?
0 likes@Mikayla H He made a decision to shoot as soon as he landed on the ground. And when you make that decision - it's almost impossible to reverse it. He didn't even see the dude took 3 steps back - that's how terrified he was.
1 likeBut sure, it's easy to judge looking at your screen. Watch actual cops - they can tell everything about it. And I don't mean ASP.
Intrspace nice try copper
1 like@Kangoshi I do understand how cops sometimes react, however:
5 likes1) This guy is not a cop. Not all cop killings are justified and this particular civilian's shooting was objectively not justified.
2) Your rationalizations are full of hypotheticals and logical fallacies.
3) Why not present your BEST piece of evidence ("what ifs" and "this is what cops do in some scenarios" aren't substitutes for actual points of data)? Can you demonstrate the shooter perceived more than one assailant or that the one known assailant was advancing on him?
4) Yes or No, was this shooting justified and what standards of evidence did you use to arrive at that conclusion?
5) If standards for lethal force are this low, does this apply to anyone who's been pushed? What about a punch? Bar-fight? Is this the precedent you want to set?
@xebek "Totality of circumstances".
0 likesAt this point let's just agree to disagree and move on.
That's why when you did nothing wrong you choose a judge instead of a jury.
@xebek So, I couldn't find Rick's first video, because it's no longer available on youtube - I don't know why. YT probably took it down and Rick doesn't even know that.
0 likesThis is the second part, when he's commenting on the comments on that video.
But fear not! Ever since his other channel got deleted without "due process" (wasn't a single strike on that channel) - I'm copying every video he puts up on my hard drive. So I'll upload it to bitchute and post a link.
For now search for the "Florida Stand Your Ground Video Discussed & Review Law & Slow Motion Video".
I'll put up a link in my next comment, but it might be get scrubbed.
Most people feel theyre less likely to be found guilty if they arent getting a lawyer. In the back of your mind you think that if you ask for a lawyer you seem guilty from the beginning
2 likes@Intrspace no, some inocent people fall in this police tactics and "confess" to shit they do not do just to have some relive from the pressure and tension of the room (if u notice even the roms are small and the suspect its put against the wall just for that purpose).
2 likesHe really believed the cops were on his side, and initially they were. Public pressure forced this into court, thank goodness
1 likeyea cause he was falsely convinced by himself that he was innocent.
0 likes@Kangoshi you mean the dude that shot was in the wrong.
1 likeGuy is guilty of being trigger derp
@Intrspace false
0 likesIf he was smart he would not have murdered anyone!
1 like@Intrspace exactly why he needs a lawyer!
0 likes@Vadim VeeVoit Innocent people lawyer up every day. Its innocent until proven guilty, not tell us you're innocent and we'll leave you alone. Even if you're innocent you can still be falsely imprisoned.
2 likes@Vadim VeeVoit im not arguing if they do or they dont. Im saying you should always speak to a lawyer first. The reality is people get falsely accused or other avoidable complications can occur. The system isnt perfect, and humans are flawed. It is a valid precaution and a right to speak to a lawyer.
1 like@Intrspace noooooooooo no no no no. believe me it is not. i'm saying this for your own benefit. PLEASE get a lawyer if you are interrogated for a crime.
1 likePencil neck. That is all.
0 likesHe thinks they're on his side. He figures they agree with his decision...
0 likes@Intrspace wrong fully wrong when you’re under investigation they’re going to press you to the maximum and use different strategies to make you look guilty and not everyone is going to be smart enough to protect themselves
1 like@Intrspace you are definitely new to the channel.
0 likes@Fancy Pants he was already guilty
0 likes@Intrspace you need to watch more of these then . Lol
0 likesPerfect comment 😂
0 likesRegardless, just demand a Lawyer and shut up!
0 likes“Never talk to a cop without a lawyer “ your mama
0 likes@Intrspace wrong
0 likesThe detective, George, was recently arrested for showing up to a crime scene drunk. Doesn’t add anything to the story, just thought it was interesting. Also, this Michael guy is delusional, glad he is serving time.
219 likesReplies (14)
Thanks
1 likeLink to story, perchance?
3 likes@scoremat google.com
8 likesLol
Finley The Golden dude that’s sad! He was off duty and had four drinks, came to the crime scene at 10:30 pm! He should’ve just said he wasn’t able to come or something :/
25 likesSad. No surprise. I hope he beats it because too many do not.
1 likeThat sucks. He seems like he's good at his job
4 likes@nevadie133 he should have not driven while drunk. Pretty simple.
9 likesHis lawyer’s best argument: video’s not HD.
2 likesHe doesn't appear impaired in this interview. In fact the interview is near perfect.
1 likeWhat if he was drinking at home before he got called out? How does that usually work? Are they on a shift, or expected to stay sober on call or something?
2 likesAlso the defendant's lawyer was arrested for a DUI. This is so textbook Florida, can't make this shit up
6 likes@BrandonLA1983 You know, I 100% believe that
0 likesWow. Thank s
0 likes@j mula when you drive there u do lol
0 likesMichael Drejka was sentenced to imprisonment for 20 years on October 10, 2019 if you were wondering.
220 likesReplies (23)
Hella yeah. Thx for the info
9 likesthanks, i wasn't gonna be able to watch this if he got away with this shit.
22 likesThank goodness
3 likesAnd his early retirement continues...
4 likesScrolling just for this update. Thanks!!
3 likesThanks for the update.
1 likewow JUST 20 years for murder
2 likesHe's getting released this year. Justice is served!
0 likes@GlitchyRhythm woah wait he's getting released?? Why that?
1 likeGood
0 likes@sadly not Xiao no he isn’t being released
1 like@Vibeswell i think 20 years is enough no one deserves life in prison imo
2 likes@1023sdot oh, good! I hope he has to serve the whole 20 years in prison. It's kinda not much actually cuz I mean he took a persons life.
0 likes@Elmo Vanners if he gets back out he’ll do something like this again. You have a high opinion on murderers.
5 likes@Elmo Vanners No one deserves to have their partner and dad murdered. 20 years is kind. He has a second chance at life when he's released when the victim doesn't.
6 likes@Vibeswell yep. Imagine if it was backwards and the black gentleman killed the white guy.
1 like@MRDTH I agree with you but no one should be locked in a cage like they are an animal especially not for the rest of their lives many other countries handle criminals better by actually rehabilitating criminals rather than locking them up in a cage
0 likes20 years seems a bit much. 10 would seem more appropriate for this case.
1 likeThats 21 days before I lost my virginity.
0 likesIf someone pushed me like that I would have aimed for the head
1 likeThis was all I was digging through the comments for, thank you!
0 likes@MRDTH Absolutely. He deserves life in prison. You wrongfully take someone else's life (murder) you don't deserve a second lease on life 20 years later. In front of their kids too. Evil!
0 likes@Robin Luv who got assaulted first?
0 likesProsecution: Here is security footage that shows he is guilty
1575 likesDefense: But it isnt in HD!
Replies (15)
I think he was trying his best. He is required to do whatever he can to win the case, otherwise it could end in a mistrial. Even the worst person needs their lawyer to do the absolute best to fight for them in order to ensure that the case against them is sound. Numerous bad people have been released or had their cases drawn out needlessly simply due to their lawyer not trying very hard.
63 likes@Boanerges57 Well, his job is to give him the best defense possible, not necessarily to win the thing. If your client is caught dead to rights, if you can get him twenty years instead of thirty or the death penalty, you've done a good job.
22 likesProsecution*
9 likesTHE COLORS WERE OFF! HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO KNOW WHO IS WHO AND WHAT IS WHAT WHEN THE HUE IS SLIGHTLY OFF?
8 likes@Peter Alexander Danneskiold-Samsøe You don't force a client to do anything, you counsel them (hence why lawyers are also call counsellors). At the end of the day, the defense lawyer gets paid either way, so forcing a client to enter a particular plea holds no advantage for the lawyer.
4 likesAnd I never said anything about being righteous or lawful, I just said what the role of a defense lawyer is... That lawyer did his job well because his client was facing a maximum of 30 years and he got him 20 years...
@Marco Polo 'Supposed to know hue is hue' you mean ;)
3 likes@anddudewaslike It's his job to make the best defense possible, even for the worst people. It doesn't mean he believes or even likes his client, but if bad guys don't get adequate defense then good guys won't either. It's how the system has to be to ensure protection for everybody.
2 likesI read this comment to see if someone would correct : prosecution 😃
2 likes@anddudewaslike its just his job mate
0 likesLawyers will try anything. They get paid good to lie
0 likesAh yes a little wave here and there so you can’t see anything clearly. Oh and the color is black and white which makes a large difference as well, he’s innocent
0 likesIs it really him if it isn't in 4k?
3 likesI mean the defense is the defense for a reason, regardless of what happened they gotta try and sell something
0 likesI'm wheeziiiingg
0 likesThe video I saw was of a man getting jumped because he complained about a woman parking in a handicapped spot. I guess you all saw another video.
2 likesHe seems pretty proud to me of his shooting skills and how he used his “training” as a “force multiplier” he seemed pretty damn proud to me!
184 likesReplies (5)
he'll get "force multiplied" in prison
13 likes3Ring Binder lmaooo
3 likes@ActionGolfers lol yep lol
0 likesHe should be proud. He obtained those skills so thugs don’t get away with attacking him. Even if the black guy wasn’t going to attack him after shoving him so hard he smacked the pavement, you don’t get to just assault someone for a trivial reason as arguing and get away with it. The world would be a lot safer if you assumed you’d get shot for so much as pushing someone
2 likes@Deez Nuts I agree but your comment will be deleted as well
1 likeGuy claps at 33:33, pog
0 likesand this is why you always ask for a lawyer, ALWAYS
1 likeHow did he instigate being attacked? I really dont feel telling someone they're illegally in a handicap spot warrants a freak out or especially physical assault. The camera footage shows he never got physical or violent, im having a hard time understanding why the guy is allowed to attack him for speaking?
1 likeReplies (1)
He's not allowed to attack him Justin. I don't think you understand that being pushed over still doesn't warrant kill someone.
1 likeSt. Matthew 7 Judge not, that you may not be judged,
0 likes2 For with what judgment you judge, you shall be judged: and with what measure you mete, it shall be measured to you again.
3 And why seest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye; and seest not the beam that is in thy own eye?
4 Or how sayest thou to thy brother: Let me cast the mote out of thy eye; and behold a beam is in thy own eye?
5 Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam in thy own eye, and then shalt thou see to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
6 Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their feet, and turning upon you, they tear you.
7 Ask, and it shall be given you: seek, and you shall find: knock, and it shall be opened to you.
8 For every one that asketh, receiveth: and he that seeketh, findeth: and to him that knocketh, it shall be opened.
9 Or what man is there among you, of whom if his son shall ask bread, will he reach him a stone?
10 Or if he shall ask him a fish, will he reach him a serpent?
11 If you then being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children: how much more will your Lord God, the Father who is in heaven, give good things to them that ask him?
12 All things therefore whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you also to them. For this is the law and the prophets.
13 Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat.
14 How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life: and few there are that find it!
15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
16 By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit.
19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire.
20 Wherefore by their fruits you shall know them.
21 Not every one that saith to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven: but he that doth the will of my Lord God, the Father who is in heaven, he shall enter into the kingdom of heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have not we prophesied in thy name, and cast out devils in thy name, and done many miracles in thy name?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, you that work iniquity.
24 Every one therefore that heareth these my words, and doth them, shall be likened to a wise man that built his house upon a rock,
25 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat upon that house, and it fell not, for it was founded on a rock.
26 And every one that heareth these my words, and doth them not, shall be like a foolish man that built his house upon the sand,
27 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat upon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall thereof.
28 And it came to pass when Lord God, the Great King Jesus Christ had fully ended these words, the people were in admiration at his doctrine.
29 For he was teaching them as one having power, and not as the scribes and Pharisees.
Word of the Blessed Lord God, the King. Thank You Blessed Lord God, the King and Savior Jesus Christ.
All you great numerous enemies; the enemy of the holy death of my Lord God, the King and Master Jesus Christ on the Cross of Calvary; the prince of darkness and iniquity, the father of all liars; I stand on the death of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ and offer His pains, wounds, and the Precious Blood of His left hand to the Eternal Father Lord God for your downfall, your destruction and your scourging. Amen. Precious Blood of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ - reign in me and in the lives of all men. Amen.
O holy loving Father, Lord God, the King of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Who protected the Israelites of old in His holy wings in the dryness of the cold and hot desert; I offer You the holy death of my Master and Savior, Jesus Christ, for the protection of Your people who are scattered all over the world. May the Blood and water wash and strengthen, save and cleanse us that we might find home in the Sacred Side of Your Holy Son that opens for all men. Amen. Sacred Side of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - be our home for safety. Amen.
Omnipotent and Omniscient Lord God, the King, Lord God, the King of Elijah and the prophets, look at the Sacred Head of Your only-begotten Holy Son and have mercy. Arise and save Your people. I offer You all the shame, the pains, the wounds and the Precious Blood from the Sacred Head of Your Holy Son for all Your children who are living in these perilous times. Strengthen our true faith through the mockery of Your Holy Son, Lord Jesus Christ, and save us through the Precious Blood from His Sacred Head. May we, through the sufferings of Your Holy Son, Jesus Christ, learn to suffer in You and die in You. Amen. Holy tortures of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - increase our true faith. Amen.
Merciful and holy loving Father Lord God, the King, Your wish is that all men shall be saved. Kindly look on Your rejected and condemned Holy Son Who suffered many tortures and will suffer many through the sins of Your people. Look and see what sin has done to your only-begotten Holy Son. I offer for all Your people who are living in these ungodly and wicked days, all the tortures, pains, rejection and shame of your Son, Lord Jesus Christ, to You, for the true faith to withstand trials and holy patience to withstand long torture. May they through the suffering of Your only Holy Son, fight to the end. Amen. Our Lord God, Jesus Christ the King's torture - increase our true faith. Precious Blood of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - save us. Amen.
It wasn’t self defense it was revenge.He was embarrassed that he got pushed.Blind rage is still man slaughter
299 likesReplies (9)
Not even revenge, he's been waiting for this moment to have a legal excuse to shoot someone
14 likesYou dont go around throwing people on the floor and then step up to them in a threatening manner . He could of easily load out his clip on him but he just shot once. Just like a cop would !
9 likes@Dj d I agree there was no need for physical escalation. That wasnt a light push, and pulling the gun probably would be necassary. However, I dont think he needed to shoot, once the gun was drawn the guy backed up. It would be different if the guy kept advancing. No need to shoot.
2 likes@Dj d I agree with everything you said. I wasnt trying to disagree with you, just point out that the shooting part was not necessary. N yes all over stupid stuff.
0 likesLol i was looking for this comment cause thats exactly what happened.
0 likesANHZ 52 I didn’t realize that hand gun had a clip? Or was he using a hand gun variant of a M1 Garand with a stripper clip?
0 likesBlind rage is second degree murder
1 like@Dra6onfly let's see how that works out for you ...maybe if he had not pushed him to the floor . He wouldn't have take out his gun and shoot him on the spot . Maybe ! How is that playing hero ? He just wants to have the space reserved for handicap people ...its that so wrong to just asking them to please move ? But people are dumb and have big egos ,so they tend to get offended for everything ,thus he got shot and his wife is a widow and the shooter is in jail ! No one wins because everyone had a huge ego .
0 likes@ANHZ 52 Smart enough to admit and correct a mistake, Pythagoras! 😂
0 likesI bet he’s short....
0 likesWhere's your other vids!!!!
0 likespeople should just mind their own business, who cares if someone parked illegally just move on dummy lmao
0 likesGive a peasant a sword and he'll pretend he's a knight.
2 likesI live in this area. This man caused issues at this store constantly. I love how he called it HIS store when the owner of the store loathed whenever he visited and caused issues like this. It was only a matter of time for it to escalate
705 likesReplies (29)
What?! He seems like an upstanding citizen!! /s
50 likesLike what would he do?
1 likeThis whole thing is a karen situation, he’s one of those people that think they own places
54 likesI'm calling bs
7 likesIf more people around the store had guns too, they could've stopped him!
2 likes@High Speed 74D we've got a detective, folks. The people's champ.
13 likes@Kwon i hope you're being sarcastic.....he pulled his weapon and fired in an instant. No one, with a weapon or not, could have stopped that man from being shot to death.
9 likesThe only thing that could have stopped that was the father choosing to use words instead of physically assaulting the shooter.
@Far from Irrational He actually paused for 2.5sec before shooting. Which mattered a lot in this case.
6 likes@Kwon To me that says "Should...yeah, fuck it. Ima shoot him." Premeditated, not quite but he DAMN sure decided to.
13 likesSorry you guys had to deal with that.
0 likes@Finished!!!!!! There is nothing in the video to suggest he was racially motivated.
8 likesYup. All this situation needed to blow up was another reckless and violent person.
0 likesWat am i missing here seems like he acted in self defense from video
0 likes@Gordon Zimmerman It seems like the controversy is around whether the shot was justified. The prosecutor says the black guy disengaged the situation and there was no need to shoot.
1 likeThe other side is once he pulled the gun what else can you really do other than hold him at gunpoint or shoot. If you lower your firearm to disengage what’s stopping the other guy from going to his car and grabbing his piece?
If it wasn’t high profile for the race and 2nd amendment issue. He probably could have gotten a better deal like reckless use of a firearm. He was justified in pulling it out but whether it was the best decision to make is a different story.
He is the male Karen
1 like@Coyote Rx he was justified in drawing his weapon, but the problem was the actual shooting. In conseled carry classes (at least the one i took) you are taught to draw your weapon at perceived danger, but to confirm the danger before firing. By drawing his weapon and immediately firing, he did not give himself a chance to assess the situation and see that the other guy is backing away.
4 likes@Blake Wilson I get that’s the rule but once you have a person at gunpoint what else are you really going to do other than shoot? Backing up doesn’t necessarily mean disengagement. The other guy can back up to their glove box and pull out their piece to retaliate. Would you really give them that opportunity?
0 likesIf he told the cop he was scared and it was self defended he probably would not be charged with manslaughter. He was aggressively shoved to the ground by a 3rd person during a 2 person verbal confrontation. People have been shot over a toaster on Black Friday sales. The black guy should have approached it better rather than start a N***a moment.
@Coyote Rx Really don't see your point here. Drejka never even gave any opportunity for anything to happen. Backing up is a clear sign of disengagement. What you do after that may change the situation, but the act itself is a sign of disengagement. Drejka had the upperhand in the situation, he could've waited to see what Marques was going to do, but he chose to fire without even looking at his face. I 100% agree that Marques shouldn't have pushed him and that he was justified in pulling his gun. But shooting? No. Drejka was at an advantage when he pulled the gun and he had the time to wait and see what Marques was going to do. Even if Marques chose to keep the confrontation, he needed time to get a weapon, or to approach Drejka to beat him up. Drejka didn't even consider giving him this time, he just shot.
3 likesObs: your statement about the "N word moment" is so racist I had to stop and read it again to make sure someone said such a thing
@Far from Irrational you just skipped so many key factors just like the dude who committed the crime..
0 likes@pepelapiu2004 facts, definitely can’t say it was race but he still murdered him
2 likes@Coyote Rx You seem to think that once you pull out a gun, there are only two options: shoot or lower your gun.
3 likesYou could keep your gun on him until he is established to no longer being a danger to you.
You could keep your gun on him while you walk back and out of this situation. You could keep your gun on him until the cops arrive.
You can't shoot a man based on what you think he might do in the future.
@Jojo Cottrell04
2 likesYup, it was a murder alright. But I don't appreciate when ppl try to twist everything for their political agenda.
@pepelapiu2004 i feel u lol, wouldnt really consider dude calling the shooter racist political
0 likes@Jojo Cottrell04 It's called identity politics. The result is a divided populace more easily conquered.
0 likes@pepelapiu2004 If he just turned around and shot though he would be justified. The fact that he stopped for a second is what did it. It’s a tough one to call because gun violence is so rampant in today’s society there’s little recourse.
0 likesYou can keep your gun on him while you walk back and out of the situation.
-if you’re standing up yes you can. He was on the ground though that’s considered a disadvantage.
You can keep your gun on him until the cops arrive.
Someone has to call the cops to begin with. If you’re holding someone at gun point you’re not going to take your eyes off them to unlock your phone dial 911. That’s why cops have radios on their shoulders to call for backup so they can hold up a suspect without taking their eyes off him.
You can’t shoot a man based on what you think he may do.
No you can’t but once physical aggression has been established that rule kind of flies out the window. The black guy already established he’s willing to cause physical harm over the altercation. It’s not unreasonable at that point to think a person will continue aggression.
There’s many options to what you can do but what you can do and what’s feasible are completely different.
If 2nd amendment issues and race cards weren’t at play this situation would probably be completely different. Manslaughter I feel is justified because shoving him to the ground is engaging in combat. I would personally charge him with reckless use of a fire arm. Based on an apparent previous situations where this guy was waiving his gun at people.
I believe this guy was looking for an excuse to legally shoot someone one day. So he probably was a bit quick to escalate the situation to drawing his gun. However, the black guy took it to the next level by engaging in physical violence. If the white guy had a lawyer with him during questioning. This would definitely had a different outcome.
@Coyote Rx The black guy was clearly stepping back, not forward. It's clear he was not a threat to anyone while stepping backwards.
1 likeYes, if you are on a ground, you are at a disadvantage, but not if you have a gun pointed at your assailant.
That shooting was clearly not justifiable.
Wow! That is quite an insight.
0 likescomplete bullshit lmao
0 likes@Don't watch CNN ! Fake News ! ur name is hilarious
0 likesthe lawyer talks like trump lol
0 likesWHY ARE YOU DELETING YOUR VIDEOS PLEASE STOP PLEASE
0 likesDon’t answer any questions.
0 likeswhat amazes me is that none of these people talk to a lawyer before they give information to the investigators
3 likesReplies (2)
You look guilty when you ask for a lawyer. But yeah, very stupid of these guys not to.
0 likesIf they did jcs would be boring
1 likeI am so glad this incident was caught on tape so the actual events could be seen!
108 likesReplies (2)
yeah and he's acting like nothing was taped 😂
4 likesME TOO. I hate that we’re under constant surveillance except for when it calls out liars.
4 likes31:58
1 like''NeGaTiVe''
0 likesNah thats Murder
0 likes29:53😳😳😳
0 likesso, while as the sole caretaker of a disabled parent, it does frustrate me when able bodied people use the handicapped parking because "they'll just be a minute", "real quick in and out", just grabbing a to-go order or picking up their mail, but inevitably they're now an obstacle in a disabled person's ability to freely move about society, and disabled people should never have to beg abled people for their own dignity.
656 likesbut this man isn't disabled, and isn't defending anyone who is. he's a little man with a hero complex who likes waving his gun around to make himself feel like a big tough man who has the right to boss others around. parking in the handicapped parking when you aren't handicapped is not an offense worthy of death. no one in that family deserved to die for any of their actions. that man was clearly riding a holier-than-thou hero complex high and wanted to get revenge like a school yard bully for someone daring to stand up to him and shove his ass to the ground. he deserves every single day of jail time he gets for this senseless, needless, completely avoidable loss of human life. the trauma that now lives in that woman and her children is far worse than anything suffered by a disabled person unable to momentarily use that specific parking spot.
Replies (37)
@Jpse Barton a lot of them are, often it's to put them next to a ramp so that wheelchair users can get up the curb but a lot of places don't give a single fuck and just put it wherever they want "out of the way" bc they legally have to have at least one but there is absolutely nothing actually stopping them from making it the most useless parking spot ever, which is another huge problem, but yet another reason why this whole ordeal is so fucking stupid.
67 likesIf i had my own store and if it was legal to do i would have NO disabled parking area for one it causes waaay to many idiots to act and two it always amazes me when nearly all people just jump out the car and wander around a store for x amount of time so it always makes me think why do they want to
3 likespark nearer to the store because it makes not a bit of sense ? So if there was no disabled parking area this and many other disputes would never ever happen.
@Moon-Vixen Your original comment on top was perfectly conveyed. I agree with everything you said because that’s exactly what was going through my mind as I started reading the comments. Trust me, it’s not every week that I agree without a reasonable doubt.
9 likes@Jpse Barton exactly what I was thinking
0 likesThe accused did not go to play the hero there. It is just that some people like to play the policeman whenever they see other people breaking the rules. When he first approached the vehicle he just saw a female driver there (did not see the kid behind, the windows were tinted) and he started telling her off maybe in a stern voice. But her reaction to him was more rude than his stern way - and it is certain that she reacted that way because she knew her boyfriend was inside and would come out to protect her. We need to acknowledge her role in this too, she was not OK having parked in the disabled area and then swearing at the man who made a remark. She could de-escalate saying that she did not notice this is a disabled area and that she was OK to change the position of the car and it would had ended all there. Instead she started up a verbal fight with the man. The victim then got out and sneakily pushed the man from behind. This was a vicious move. Yes we can say he was protecting his family there, but to do so would mean to go inbetween the man and the car where his girlfriend was in. The accused was clearly not physically aggressive, only having a verbal fight with his woman. So the victim really escalated it and did so viciously attacking from behind. An attack from behind is particularly vicious in the sense that it can be interpreted as a sign of a will to do far more harm than an attack coming from in front. The victim literally pushed the man, older in age, into the air and fell to the ground. Yes he did a step back but in many fights attackers take a step back only to take more momentum and attack again with kicks nailing the guy to the ground. People have killed other people with kicks to the head in that way. You never know how it will go on.
13 likesFrom the accuser's point of view, taking out the gun was indeed correct, precisely as the prosecution lawyer said in the court. He had the right to do so in this situation. But he had no right to shoot. This is the thing : owning a gun is good... until you have to use it. The devil is in the details. When you use it you are burdened with the need to prove that the circumstances called for the usage of the gun. In this case, one cannot establish that he had to use the gun, even to wound, let alone to kill. The accused pulled the trigger not because he felt the threat was continuous but rather because of the shock he received during his fall. It was more of a tit for tat kind of escalation : the victim escalated by viciously-violently pushing him to the ground, and the accused then went on to escalate more by pulling out his gun and shooting him.
Speaking of the racism connotations here, if one is to use the racist card on the accused, i.e. that he pulled the trigger too easily because the victim was a black guy, he cannot avoid then the same token being used on the victim, i.e. that he went on to escalate and attack in such a vicious manner (and dangerous one - if he fell with the head he could even die, people have died with such falls....), precisely because what he saw there was an older white guy.
@Dinos angry bc you're just like him and don't like seeing him get what he deserves aren't you
16 likes@Moon-Vixen He didn’t seem angry
7 likes@Kat Page lmao sweetie, look at it. he wrote 5 large paragraphs (now edited down to 3) more or less about how he did nothing wrong and didn't deserve his sentence bc it was all her fault and she should have de-escalated the situation by basically groveling at the feet of the random angry white man who approached her car out of nowhere over a crime he too in that moment was guilty of. he's absolutely seething
10 likes@Moon-Vixen They didn’t say that he did nothing wrong. Yes, they said that it was not wrong to take out the gun: “taking out the gun was indeed correct,” and “he had the right to do so in this situation”, but they did say it was wrong to shoot; “But he had no right to shoot,” and “one cannot establish that he had to use the gun, even to wound, let alone to kill.”
8 likesSo it’s clear they directly acknowledged the fact that it was the wrong course of action to shoot at all, regardless of whether the intention was to kill or to injure, so they definitely didn’t suggest that the killer didn’t do anything wrong.
I never detected anger from their reply honestly. None of the language they used emitted anger, and what they said was all simply from an open standpoint. They pointed out the right and wrong in both parties. Just because they recognized that they all did something incorrect doesn’t necessarily mean that they think the girlfriend, victim, and killer were equally all at fault. The wrong of murdering someone far, far outweighs the wrong of using rude language or pushing someone, and nothing they said suggested otherwise.
I just notice that a lot of people sometimes assume that whoever disagrees with them is angry. Or when someone writes a lot of words regarding a sensitive topic, it means they had strong motivation to do so which must have stemmed from anger. Or maybe if you felt anger towards them for pointing out the incorrect actions of the victim and his girlfriend, you automatically read their reply in an angry tone that matched how you felt. I know I do that sometimes.
But the point is, maybe they were in fact angry, but nothing they said actually showed they were angry. Maybe I missed something they said, so if you want to give some pieces of evidence from their text that show they were potentially seething by all means go for it. Or there was something that suggests anger in the deleted paragraphs?
@Kat Page if you can't see it I can't help you hun. you have fun with your own cope tho lol
9 likes@Dinos "the accused was clearly not physically aggressive "
0 likes@Kat Page He didn't seem angry, and he didn't seem bothered by the outcome. Zero emotional connection or reaction.
3 likes@D D L I’m talking about a commenter though
1 likeI love watching mobility disability videos on YouTube. Always good for a proper laugh.
0 likesThe kicker is that particular disability space was not a legally designated disability parking space issued by the town.
1 likeI wonder why the wife moved the car to a different parking stall.
0 likes@Red Diver Why would that matter at all?
0 likes@Red Diver So the children would be nearby after the shooting when she went into the store to check on him.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things
1 likeHAHAHA!!! If you believe that, I have some property on the moon to sell you.
HAHA!!!
@Looking 4 Things And you make up things about what happened. The view is always nice from LaLa Land, isn't it?
0 likes@Red Diver Cackling and sarcasm are your weapons. Be better.
0 likes@Looking 4 Things
0 likesLOL
If you're going to go swimming, you're going to get wet.
@George Findlay Well then disabled people wouldn’t have a place to park and have room to get out of their car so they can access the store…
4 likesYou’d further disable disabled people by taking away disabled parking areas because of idiots who fight over or take up those spots?
In all honesty, this man is the type of guy who would harass someone who isn't visibly disabled using a handicap parking spot.
2 likesI don’t think he killed him for the parking spot. He argued with the wife over it but when the husband came he shot because he was pushed. I think the parking spot was incidental and it was more that having a gun makes some people like him just itching to use it.
1 like@Dinos And all that stuff you wrote STILL does not justify the crime of shooting a man dead in front of a gas station because he pushed you for harassing his wife and kids. That's the key thing that the separated this from him getting off on Florida's (often stupid, coming from a fellow Floridian) stand your ground laws. The question was never "was he wrong to take out the gun," the question was "was he right to SHOOT AND SHOOT AND KILL SOMEONE."
2 likesShe was parked in a handicap spot and the rest of that might have occurred, sure, but he literally posed no threat to his life and he decided to take his gun out and fire anyway even though he backed up 3 steps and turned away to walk away. All that stuff you wrote literally DOES NOT MATTER. He diffused the situation when he took out his gun, and he decided to shoot the one shot that ultimately killed him anyway, and for that, he's guilty.
Why did he do it? I don't know. I'm not a professional psychologist. If I had to speculate, I'd say when he took out the firearm, the rush to an untrained person (because let's face it, gun training is not that thorough in this country) was enough to make him see everything in "fast motion." And in that moment of heightened adrenaline that comes from pointing a gun at someone, sure, maybe it seemed like the right thing to do and made it seem like the guy kept coming at him. But that's not reality. In reality, he pulled out the gun, the guy who pushed him took three steps back (WITH HIS HANDS UP, might I add), turned around to walk away, and then he got shot and killed.
The guy who killed him tried to argue the same thing you did. In his paraphrased words, "I don't know what he was going to finish but to me it looked like he was going to finish what he started." And as we can see, in Florida (and even in common sense once you take out your fucking gun and they start backing away with all their body showing signs that they "give up" as the prosecutor said), that is not a justifiable reason to KILL SOMEONE.
"She could have de-escalated by saying she was not aware" or whatever, is not a justifiable reason to take out your gun let alone discharge it and kill someone. Him shoving you to the ground, as the prosecutors acknowledged, is a reasonable cause to reach for your gun. But once he starts backing away three steps with his hands up and turning to walk away, the situation is diffused, and you have NO REASON to fire your gun. And furthermore, why are you only thinking of DREJKA'S perspective in the situation? From the guy who shoved him, all he saw was his wife and kids getting harassed so he got confrontational. Where's the rationalization for him, whose only "crime" was pushing the guy who was yelling at his wife and kids?
No amount of shit you write can justify what he did in taking another person's life who was just trying to buy some shit from the gas station.
@Saito Dosan agreed he had no reason to use the gun. He was not in a right state of mind. Possibly earlier too but certainly after the violent push. A push which was also unwarranted itself. A tragedy altogether for no reason. One man 10 feet under, another in jail for life. For no reason.
0 likes@George Findlay I will say, people wouldn’t know I’m disabled if they saw me, because I can walk around and go through stores and stuff, but I’m 100% through the VA for major medical issues, which does have to do with walking a lot and standing for long periods, it’s hard to judge just because someone steps out of a car and walks around. In order for you to even get the handicap plaque you have to get a letter through your doctor. And it’s hard to get one.
0 likes@TonksArt I always find it so funny when a "handicapped" person says that they want to be treated like a normal person......until it comes to putting there hand in there pocket...i wish and hope for the day when someone "handicapped" wants to pay normal prices that the able "able bodied" have to pay.
0 likesHow do you deal with handicapped spot parkers who shouldn't? If they are still present I show my disabled parking placard and they'll usually apologize and drive off to park somewhere else. I've also when the drivers aren't there, approached nearby police officers who would then have these cars towed (meaning the owner will get a fine for illegal parking, and have to pay the towing costs). In other cases I've done what my dad used to do when I was a kid and someone parked at the disabled spot without a placard: deflate the tires of those cars.
0 likesThe killer is in the wrong for shooting, obviously. But I can't bring myself to sympathize with the victim either considering how often I've had to walk long painful distances with my crutches due to these types.
@moon-Vixen not to mention this specific disabled spot is actually the furthest from the actual door and when he first pulled up every spot in front of the door was available! Plus he told the cops he was coming from WAWA down the road and obviously only stopped because he saw a car in the spot and he wanted to make sure they had a tag! These kind of people are not looking out for people, this kind of person is looking for a confrontation.
0 likesi'm gonna say a lot of disabled people have it off worse than the family of a dead guy
0 likes@Red Diver The allow the ambulance to easily pick up her husband.
0 likes@Kat Page at the end of the day killing somebody for pushing you is excessive force which was obviously conveyed during his trial. Michael would’ve never beaten the case seeing as thou his life was never in danger and that he was just scared. When Michael takes his gun out there’s at least 4 feet between him and the victim. Victim slowly starts retreating and yet Michael still sees fit to shoot this man in “fear” of his life. He might as well have had his back turned
0 likes"...parking in the handicapped parking when you aren't handicapped is not an offense worthy of death."
2 likesAgree. The offense was running up to an individual and knocking him to the ground. Drejka definitely escalated things by pulling his gun. Drejka deserves to go to jail. AND people who illegally park in handicapped stalls and refuse to move are still scumbags.
@George Findlay what are you on about? Do you just have hatred for disabled ppl or something?
0 likes@Alicia Taylor No its just that they want they want to be treated as a "normal" person until it comes to putting there hands in there pockets then they want all the money etc etc
0 likesI like how the cop asked him “do you think you could have taken him in a fair fight?” …(that was brilliant). By asking the question the officer revealed just how faint hearted (a coward) this guy is.
386 likesReplies (27)
No, thats a foolish question for the officer to ask. The only correct answer is no.
15 likesI'm sure it would've been a brilliant question to ask Marquis too, considering he blindsided someone who clearly wouldn't have stood a chance of fighting back.
25 likes@J3 Omega idk man. What if that was your girl? Idk how you feel about a man getting up in your girls face and yelling at her. If it were me I would have acted very similar. I guess I am more of the protective type but i mean that man wasnt just close to her he was close and I would not wait for him to get any closer before putting myself between him and my girl or pushing him away. Maybe not as hard as he did but adrenaline is a hell of a drug. And with the only context being this crazy man up in your girls face and yelling saying god knows what you better believe I'm intervening and putting him in his place. Just a slight shove to create distance or just grab him by the shoulders while talking to him. Anything to make sure he can not harm my woman. But thats just my take on it.
30 likesI dont think it was meant to show him as coward, i think it was meant as to show if there was any other option. If Drejka would answer "yes" to that question it would show that he could defend himself fighting instead of shooting. Answer "no" was the right one in term of his defense but not the answer cop was looking for. What do the cop care if he is a coward or not.
11 likes@Killer Macchiato he wouldn't know what having a girl is like
8 likes@J3 Omega Dont wanna be blind sided? Don't confront women with children in parking lots huffing and puffing
32 likes@J3 Omega You completely implied that through your choice of words
9 likes@J3 Omega wow, you need a lot of attention. A review of your channel is a real eye opener to your motives for comments on this video. I like how many vids in your playlist mention the N word. Real classy. #racist #racistpos
14 likesLet me explain the question of "do you think you could have taken him in a fair fight?" since some people got side tracked or uptight in their own pity issues.
2 likesIt is not a fair fight if you are trying to fight someone with your fists and the other person draws a gun. That is a very unfair fight since they have more range, can inflict greater damage, and be very safe while doing it all. It is still an unfair fight if someone brings a knife since it can do greater damage as well despite the closer range.
By asking him if he thinks he could have taken him in a fair fight was to see if he could handle himself without a gun or any other weapon. If someone says yes than they answered the weapon wasn't needed. These questions are about the contents of the situation and the answer of the person in question. It really speaks out, when looked further into, their mindset.
Really that is all there is, by saying it was pointless just tells us that you would be clueless on how to interrogate someone. It is okay to not know how and to blindly suggest otherwise, but not so great if you keep up a pointless act and show everyone you have so much free time to stalk down a post you made a month ago to "defend" yourself by attacking everyone else. Just put the gun down.
@Melatonin That's about the response I expected. XD How disappointing.
2 likes@Aljoša P I think there was an argument there either way. I agree if he said yes then what you said would be the argument by the prosecution. Since he said no, I think they were showing that the only reason he decided to approach the situation was that could become physical was because he had a firearm on him. He was confident because he had a gun. He wouldn’t have even tried to find another way out of this confrontation other than shooting an unarmed man.
2 likes@J3 Omega you got dragged and owned trailer park native.
4 likesLove love love it
1 like@Greg Perry thanks babe, you too 😘
2 likes@Jon Mancuso 100%. So fucking fragile its sad
0 likes@Greg Perry to be fair, clowns bring some happiness and fun. This snowflake just brings fragility and disappointment
0 likesThe whole concept of a fair fight is non-existent here. If he hadn't carried a gun, the fight would also not have been fair, because physically the black dude completely outclassed him, and clearly bullied him. And before you put words in my mouth, although the dad was acting despicably, the shooter was obviously far more despicable in shooting the man as he backed off and robbing him unfairly of his life.
2 likes"Coward." Not, "...cowered."
0 likes@Johnny Natrium careful there, my dude. With sound logic like that, you're bound to get called racist by fragile, ignorant hypocrites with no actual argument.
1 like@J3 Omega He was protecting his wife, who probably wouldnt hold a fight. He did what he had to do
0 likes@Aljoša P hes making him realise his actions were wrong
0 likes@J3 Omega ur acting like the guy on this video, go do calculus bro
1 like@nebula donuts He did what he had to do protecting his wife from someone arguing with her by assaulting that person? How do you not get how silly and hypocritical it is trying to justify Markeis's foolish escalation of the situation while lambasting Michael's foolish escalation of the situation? Michael shouldn't have shot Markeis, and he should go to jail for killing him, but Markeis shouldn't have assaulted Michael, and he shouldn't be treated as if he was right for doing so.
3 likesAlso, you want to talk about acting like the guy in the video, when his argument for the entire video sounds a lot like the one you're making for Markeis. "He was protecting h̶i̶s̶ ̶w̶i̶f̶e̶ himself, who probably wouldn't h̶o̶l̶d̶ ̶a̶ ̶f̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ shoot at him. He did what he had to do." Who acts like who again? Go do some critical thinking bro.
@Killer Macchiato
2 likesWhat if that was your girl? Idk how you feel about a man getting up in your girls face and yelling at her.It doesn't matter how people feel. Emotional reactions are by definition irrational. And you just told us that you would overreact to a verbal altercation between two outside parties. It'd be one thing if Marquis walked out to find Drejka actually physically assaulting his girl. That'd be a very different scenario. And surely we can both agree that Drejka was in the wrong, but blindsiding someone violently who has not physically attacked you or your significant other is very abnormal behavior. It's an escalation.
Ultimately, this all occurred because Michael Drejka thought it was his job to make sure people parking in handicapped spots had placards - something I don't think he should have been doing btw. But the pusher escalated, and so did the shooter, and BTW both were wrong. This is what happens when two adults act without thinking.
@J3 Omega A push ≠ a shot to the lung
1 like@Killer Macchiato sounds like a good way to get shot or stabbed. you can defend by inserting yourself in between, and asking the guy to step back from a person or a car, ask the girl to step away. if he follows her then that can be threatening. even just holding someone in place can be perceived as a threat as there's obviously 2 choices, talk or strike. and no adult beging held by a stranger expects a conversation
0 likesyou cant say that when he was sucker pushed
0 likesIt’s interesting how much he stressed that he’s never been a fighter. Anybody that’s been in a fight would know how to avoid starting one.
94 likesPuppies learn how to play safely by playing unsafely, and learning to stop when that violence causes someone else pain (biting too hard gets a yip and ends the fun). They learn, while too weak to do any real damage, where the boundaries are.
Drejka thought he was portraying himself as a gentle person. All he did is show he has no idea how to respond to a little violence. Anybody that’s been in a fight would have taken that push, then seen Marquis back up, and know that no more harm was coming. But Drejka didn’t understand that, and escalated things even more.
Replies (10)
Truth. The other thing he could have done if he suspected he was getting a whooping would be to simply draw the weapon snd back off. Or even fire over his head.
4 likesI can’t say just how lucky I feel that in my. Country, even criminals don’t regularly use guns snd I don’t have to worry in every argument there’s someone like this ready and willing to use a gun.
@rafer Jefferson iii I’ll mostly agree, except people absolutely should NOT fire warning shots. You might as well blindfold yourself, spin around and fire randomly.
1 like@rafer Jefferson iii well dont go pushing random people to the ground or robbing them or looting their neighboorhood store and youll be fine
2 likesAnd, if on top of that, you live in one of the very few fucked-up countries where owning a gun is a constitutional right, you see where this can go.
1 like@Gifted Fox cases like Drejka’s are extremely rare. It’s not wannabe heroes that make the streets dangerous, especially if they get even the slightest bit of training.
0 likesMost gun owners aren’t wannabe heroes, scouring dark alleys for an excuse to kill a would-be robber. They’re just normal people that want to be prepared for an extreme situation, and are smart enough to avoid those situations entirely when possible.
Edit: also, why are you using weapon and gun as synonyms? Knives, bats, rocks and basically anything can be a weapon. It’s not about the tool, it’s about the user.
@GP question: if I’m at home and a bear starts mauling my family member what should I do? Stab it? Hope it doesn’t maul them too bad?
1 like@Normal Human 2-5 people die from bear attacks every year, more than 45000 die from gun accidents. I think your argument is pretty dumb....
1 like@GP well at least where I live the threat of a bear attack is bigger than the threat of being shot because the gun owners around here know how to be responsible
0 likesSo at the very least I think gun control should be determined by the local government
@GP the people here own guns for hunting animals
0 likesThere is absolutely no intent to hurt anyone
@Normal Human It doesn't matter. Regardless of where you live, I bet more people got killed by guns than by bears. I bet whatever you want.
0 likesThis guy is the type that has been waiting to inflict violence upon a person. The just give me a reason type of guy. His moral compass is clearly faulty. To feel justified about murdering man over a parking verified that. Wouldn't be surprised if he has a hero complex as well. Bet he wasn't counting on that security camera disproving his story. Good thing it was there or he would have probably got away with it.
53 likesReplies (1)
And the black guy who assaults you for talking to a person outside his car is a model citizen
1 likeThis officer does a great job playing buddy while gathering information all the way. Almost got this guy bragging. Smart cat.
20 likesi always get goosebumps when the narrator at the end of the videos explains the sentencing and how many years the person got.
6 likesI went to high school with this dude. I was a senior when he was a sophomore. He was a strange bird!
13 likesReplies (1)
How often did he volunteer to be hall monitor?
1 likeFrom the video alone this was completely unjustified.. he wasn't in fear for his life for even a second, just indignant at being put in his place by a black man for harassing someone. My own personal views aside that kind of behaviour is unacceptable.
24 likesReplies (2)
Maybe follow the rules of society and not attack people who you don't know? Is that an option?
1 like@Chris or mind your own business and don't go yelling at women in parking lots? Would you just let someone yell at your wife?
0 likesThe prosecution hit the nail on the head in its arguments. I was nodding along with every point made. Where as the defense was as dumb as Michael himself. They had no leg to stand on. Video evidence case closed!! Just leave people alone.
2 likesThis dude definitely seems like he really wanted to be in the armed forces, but they wouldn't let him for physical reasons.
13 likesRemember when you were a kid and someone pushed another kid on the playground? You’d think an adult could do the same as kids and get up and go tell an adult (because he clearly wasn’t one)
4 likesGreat channel and amazing breakdown of each case
3 likesHe's the type of guy to say "I would have joined the military but I would have knocked the drill instructor out" and own at least 2 dozen Tapout shirts.
8 likesHoly cow even his defense Attorney knew he was guilty.
37 likesReplies (2)
Usually the case.
6 likesHis attorney probably told him to plead guilty but the guy is so self centred he refused to, nothing the attorney can do there but give the best defence possible, but there was no good self defence
1 likeInitiates a confrontation over the pettiest of issues, gets shoved down, draws, no warning, hesitates, fires at least one shot at the retreating target- with an occupied public building as his backstop. He can't even claim self-defense at the very last second, because the dude was 100% retreating and in defensive posture when he shot him.
33 likesAs a firearms enthusiast and studier of conflict for many years, my assumption here is that this is the scared white bully situation. He probably bullies all races, but he was extra-scared by the sudden escalation from the young black male in the middle of his bullying of the black female in the car. The old white dude came from a different world than the young black man, and one is much more accustomed to handling a physical situation without fearing for his life at the early stages of physical intimidation.
It's murder, pure and simple. This is what the insane mainstream media so desperately wanted to make out of the cut-and-dry Rittenhouse case.
Replies (13)
well said, im not one to pull the racist card on people, but there seems to be no other reason to shoot dude after he was trying to flee. Or he is just a sico who wanted an excuse to kill.
1 likeThe rittenhouse case for me was determined by one factor, whether he was legally allowed to be in possession of that firearm at that time. If he wasn't supposed to have the gun it was his fault, if he was allowed to have it then it was self defence, simple as that
0 likes@Lilith-Rose that may be your opinion, but that doesn't determine weather someone should be tried for 1st degree murder. lets say he was not allowed to have the gun, would the fact that he was acting in self defense, be completely negated because he was not allowed to own the weapon that he used to keep himself from harm? no. Thank god an argument like that would not hold up in court, because If I did, many people would not even get a chance to testify in court, because they would be dead..
2 likes@LODUS yes it would absolutely be negated by that fact, and he would have been charged with manslaughter because of it, as would anyone else in that situation. If you are not legally allowed to possess something it is physically impossible to legally use it to defend yourself because the very act of possession is illegal, end of story
3 likes@Lilith-Rose are you a lawyer?
1 likeTo be honest, as much as this man is in the wrong, the family’s self-entitlement and non-civil nature is only being overshadowed here. The woman parks in a handicapped spot, instead of admitting her error and moving when called out, she escalated it into a verbal argument. Her husband then came out and assaulted a man for arguing. The only reason they’re not the ones who came out as villains is because this man was even for self-entitled and non-civil to the point of using deadly force unreasonably. Had he reacted differently and called the police instead of shooting, the perception of this whole thing would be completely different.
1 like@Michael James Yea, bad take.
0 likes@Jon Mancuso The only people who have a “bad take” are the ones who aren’t reasonable enough to see a story has more than one point of view with multiple possible endings. All 3 adults in this video made calls based on bad judgment. If I were put into any of all three situations, I would have reacted differently than they did. Only one of them had a weapon and used deadly force which over shadows the rest. Parking in a handicapped spot is lack of common courtesy, being called out on it and arguing back is a display of self-entitlement. Seeing a man argue with your wife and lunging at him without first using verbal communication to dessiminate the non-physical altercation shows the man’s lack of judgement and willingness to act before he thinks. Shooting someone because you were pushed down to the ground is also an impulsive, bad judgment call. If you can’t see that, you’re letting your emotions guide you rather than your logic, thus giving YOU a bad take.
0 likes@Lilith-Rose The worst take in this thread so far comes from you. Had Kyle not had the rifle with him, the pedos would catch him and kill him. He did what needed to be done to save his life. Simple as.
0 likesBut the most important point is that illegal possession of an object does not disqualify one from their right to defend their life with reasonable force. There have been countless cases in multiple different legal systems and an opinion such as yours is never even considered. I remember a case of a person who literally grabbed an unregistered pistol from a mugger and killed the perp with it and the illegal possession of an illegal firearm didn't even come up in court.
@laszu in your example they took the weapon from the attacker, they weren't carrying it already so that's a completely different situation. Plus if Kyle wasn't there with a rifle he wouldn't have been chased and wouldn't have needed to use the rifle so again your point is invalid
0 likes@Lilith-Rose Which brings me to another interesting thought. By your logic the dude that got his arm shredded up would be held accountable for ALL events that unfolded there, since he drew his illegal glock.
0 likes@laszu you do know that if someone is killed during the commission of a felony all involved are charged with it, so yes he should have been charged
0 likes@Lilith-Rose Again. What for? ??? What article of which law criminalizes the act of removing politically-extreme graffiti and extinguishing fires? ???
0 likesif there is one thing I've learned watching these videos, it's that you aren't convincing the police by yourself, get a damn lawyer that's the only thing that should be coming out of your mouth.
0 likes35:00 . Standing up for the rules of society doesn’t mean you’re “bold”. It means you are a good citizen.
3 likesAsian country’s are a good example of this. They don’t want trouble, but will call you out when you’re in the wrong.
This man shouldn’t have been attacked for mere words. The fact they consider using that against him, calling someone out for not follow the rules, is down right SHAMEFUL!!!
The death of the young man is absolutely tragic and shouldn’t have happened. The physical altercation should have never happened either. My heart and prayers goes out to the kids.
Replies (3)
my thoughts exactly, I wonder what the cops' intentions were when they are interrogating this guy. I feel like they are pushing for the guy to incriminate himself rather than trying to find out what exactly happened after the guy had clearly shown that he was willing to cooperate. I think they should have shown him the video and have him explain what happened as events transpired. And also have the witnesses on the scene corroborate with the CCTV footage.
0 likesThose “mere words” were loud, angry threats against that man’s wife and children. He reacted like any protective father would, or should.
1 like@zgra74 we didn't actually hear the words that he said, the CCTV footage didn't have any audio to actually hear the threats against the wife and the children.
0 likesI watched the cctv footage once, and knew he was going to get convicted. The prosecution should have needed only to have played the footage and rested their case.
4 likesI'm a gun advocate, but this is exactly why I believe that there needs to be longer and better processes of someone being able to legally get a gun and be able to actually carry that gun. When I went to get my CPL I had went to the range for 9-10 months after buying my pistol to practice with it and get comfortable and knowing I knew how to use the gun properly and safely, was able to take it apart and put it back together. I then felt comfortable being able to take a class properly to actually carry something that could end somebodys life. I've been around guns and shot guns my whole life and even after that amount of time I still didn't think I was ready to actually carry something that could be used to harm/kill another person.
34 likesThe FIRST THING they teach you is that actually using the gun is the absolute last thing that you should ever do and to completely avoid confrontation or putting yourself in a scenario that could be confrontational. The scariest part about that class was when we went to the range and you had to actually demonstrate you could shoot the gun properly and reload it etc. Everyone in that class besides myself and 3 others, literally DIDN"T know how to shoot a gun and take it off safety or could even shoot straight. Shit some of them have never shot a gun before in there life. I was in shock that these people could actually be carrying something that could harm somebody.
I think you do have the right to own guns and that shouldn't change but what needs to change is the process of getting the guns and being able to carry those guns. This whole situation should never have happened over a stupid ass handicap spot.
Replies (2)
I am a uk military medic and love guns but 100% agree with you
2 likesExactly
1 likeNo responsible gun owner actually wants to shoot anyone
imagine if he didnt talk to police and made his case about how he could have possibly died from the push if he hit his head. he could have argued that in the shock state he was he was fearing for his life after the possible assault on his life
4 likesI could never be a defense lawyer in these situations. The minute I see the video I would just tell the judge to lock him up lol
7 likesReplies (2)
😅🤣
1 likehe would go to jail if he were guilty, good lawyer or not. lawyer gets paid either way for their argument.
0 likesI would understand if the man actually did come at him after he knocked him down and then he fired his weapon that’s understandable but the video it clearly shows after he draws handgun the man backs up and he’s not a threat because he clearly noticed the handgun aimed at him all around a bad situation you shouldn’t be going up to random people knocking them to the ground and you should not immediately draw your firearm
2 likesCan you guys please make more videos. This helps alot with me studying human behavior
4 likesReplies (1)
Quality over quantity
1 likeClassic example of a questionable defensive shooting leading to a easy conviction by the shooter not getting a good lawyer immediately.
1 likeGuy was picking fights and had to pull the gun the second he gets knocked off his high wall. What a pathetic excuse of a human tbh.
6 likesAt around 11:50 the Explanation for the term “ apeal to extremes”. Was explained very well.
1 likeHe got 20 years in prison, he might still be able to go home after prison and enjoying life. What happens with the entire family he just destroyed? 20 years ladies and genttlemen is what it costs to destroy a human life and family. I would say death sentence
2 likesReplies (1)
Yeah its insane!!!!!!
0 likesWow, his arm didn't hurt at all while he was in the room by himself but as soon as they walked in he went straight into acting mode
0 likesDrejka kept raising the level of aggression while armed just so he could put himself in this position so he could do what he has been fantasizing about.....killing someone in 'self defense.'
2 likesOfficer: "I just wanted to tell you... the man you shot is deceased"
6 likesKiller: "Thank you"
bro...
What I hate most about this case, is that if the people who had been threatened with the gun in previous events had just told the police... He would not have a firearm. This was a failure by the American people to report a dangerous individual.
9 likesi seem to remember my parents watching fox news and discussing with me why they thought this seemed justified
1 likeThat sigh in the officers voice at 21:56 when he gets him off the floor, he knew in that moment what had happened, he knew he had to keep humouring him to get him to dig his own grave.
1 likeThe prosecutor closing argument was all over the place.
1 likeOMG he's so faking that arm 'injury'. It moves just fine when he needs to use it to make a point.
2 likesWow, when the defense says a literal video recording is not 'representative of what happened' because it wasn't in HD. What a joke.
1 likewhy shoot once if the ''threat'' was coming towards you ... he shooted once because he was backing away ...
1 likeCarrying a gun and going shopping is beyond my comprehension!
1 likeWhy did he have a gun? Was he looking for a fight? He wouldn’t change anything!!? How about not approach a women alone in a car with her children or have a loaded fun in your pocket. He is an angry person, and was looking for trouble! Syncopate!!!!
2 likesIf he had talked to a lawyer before hand, would he have won the case?
0 likesHe is pretty inconsistent in how injured his arm is supposed to be.
0 likesonly bit I have a problem with is this "perfect shot" the guy ran back in the store, 5 seconds, plenty of time to return fire, a "perfect shot" head shot, the person drops instantly, no chance of return fire.
0 likesGonna be a sad day when I finish this whole channel..
0 likesQuality viewing
Well done J. C. S
The way he’s sat with his glasses on the end of his nose writing notes like an intellectual he’s a frickin murderer smh!
4 likesReplies (1)
I ACTUALLY THOUGHT HE WAS A DA ngl
1 likeThis guy probably would have walked if he had just kept his mouth shut and got a lawyer. Thankfully he wasn't that smart
1 likeIt's crazy to think these are the same mindsets that think a 6 foot distance during a pandemic isn't necessary. However. "gotta save my life after harassing others " is. Yeesh.
1 likeI’m a cop…that defense never works, Homicide implies a motive..
0 likesI find it baffling that these disgusting people of the “law” can defend these criminal’s. Exactly why I don’t stick my foot in the mud
2 likesReplies (1)
This. Man was an ex-con AND massively escalated te situation INFRONT of his family. Was fresh out of prison and looking for trouble. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. A tragedy, in a sense.
0 likes"It was an assumption DEFINITELY"
1 likeJ.F. Christ, just hand the prosecution the win why dont you.
28:13 The arm seemed to make a miraculous recovery.
0 likesAt around 1:40 onwards on the clock top right, his right arm comes to life when he gets defensive, waving arms and everything
0 likes@ 40:00 that was a lie intended to justify his actions to the court , but it prolly had to opposite effect. Anyone that has killed someone do not want to go through it again .
0 likesThis dude is such a coward. Starts a confrontation with a woman with her kids present, then when confronted and defended by her boyfriend, his reaction is to shoot first. Such a Pathetic Coward. 😡
3 likesReplies (1)
The boyfriend is a coward. The guy shoots him with a gun and he runs away while the wife is helpless with their child.
0 likesThis couldve all been avoided if he minded his own business not saying the lady was in the right but her boyfriend wouldve been alive
0 likeswhat I see here, is that this dude, thinks it's normal that someone had died, for a parking place.
1 likeplease come back, i love this account, i need more!
0 likesWhy didn't he give him a warning?
0 likesSeems pretty strange to me
That black woman’s expression in the back was more hilarious than that lady’s when that lawyer said he was the victim.
0 likesthe defense attorney lmaoooo they look like clowns when they try to defend people like this
1 like19 mins! Within 19 mins the first responders showed up. You’re as good as dead in these streets with response times like that
0 likesHe murdered a father and husband for what? Stupid everyday fight. There wasn't any imminent threat for his life. The person who pushed him, stepped away while he was aiming! I believe he didn't mean to kill him. But because of that he deserve's a second murder degree charges.
1 likeThere was no immediate threat until you showed up 🙁
1 likeDid anybody tell this guy that he is not a parking inspector?
1 like@ 16:19 how did you determine the moment the window was opened?
0 likesThough I hate ppl that park in handicapped spaces I find it odd he would make a big deal about it when there were so many actual closer parking spaces that were closer to the entrance of the store. Recognising of course most handicapped spots are usually wider than most for obvious reasons. If he was so concerned about the situation he could have called the police (not using the 911 #) and report the person) he had no justification for shooting this guy as the man was not armed
0 likesThese videos are my lifeline
0 likesHe probably woulda got away with it if there wasn’t surveillance sadly
0 likes29:38 - the following 10 seconds explains everything
0 likesShoots someone dead , shows no emotion. Talks about his dogs and starts crying
0 likesWanna know someone? give him power.
1 likeUSA: Let's give everyone a firearm, I want to know every citizen's true form.
why the heck did that detective shake the hand of the man that he KNOWS just murdered a guy in cold blood
0 likesim mad that his tattoo was actually quite clever and cute
1 likeToo many men exactly like him among us
1 likeDrejka looked for trouble and so did McGlockton.
0 likesJFC. "I couldn't see his hands, his face, if he had a weapon, if he had others with him, where he came from... He didn't say anything, either. But I can tell you he was Black, at my store, and coming to finish me. I had those reasons to shoot." I wonder what news station this tool watches.
1 like#BlackLivesMatter
Funny this guy calls this his store and he's there every day and yet somehow hss no idea of the servalance cameras!
0 likesCouldn’t he have meant he had a permit to park in the handicapped spot? Or does he? Lol wtf this whole thing is so sad honestly: over a parking spot.
0 likesThe guy you shot for no reason is dead, ok thank you for telling me 😶
0 likesThere were empty parking spaces all over. They should never have parked in the handicapped spot. The driver's behavior was inexcusable!
1 likeReplies (4)
Do you have any feeling about the murderer also parking illegally?
3 likes@Taarkin No. He was on a mission!
0 likesI can't decide what would be worse: if you actually believe that Drejka was justified in his actions or if you're just trying to stir shit up. At a certain point, it's all the same I guess.
1 like@nolanone I don't think the shooter was justified. I do think that each party, the driver, the assaulter, and the shooter were culpable in the outcome of this tragic event. What if the driver had simply moved her car? What if the assaulted had said something, instead of blindsiding the shooter? What if the shooter had minded his own damn business?
0 likesugh it's sickening to see how many people in these comments are defending this murderer. parking in the wrong spot does not justify murder. failing to de-escalate and shoving someone during an argument also does not justify murder, wtf is wrong with y'all?! just say you're racist and go.
2 likesThese videos tell me 1 important thing. Guilty or innocent. Shut up. Let your lawyer speak for you.
1 likeMichaels lawyer makes me so angry
1 likeWhere does he get these interview tapes from??
0 likesThis man really talking ab “surrounding threats” sir it’s not Vietnam this is a gas station
1 like35:20 bookmarking the force multiplier bit for future reference
0 likesI am a military medic 100% he be alive if the paramedic got there in 5 minutes but thay have to wait for the police i think i from the uk in the uk we have to wait for the armed police before paramedics go in to help RIP buddy
0 likesIt's the way he made an arm sling out of his shirt for me
0 likesI understand that he had him on gunpoint, but not that he pulled the trigger
0 likesall this "immediate threat" this "potential threat" someone tell him life isnt a COD lobby???
1 likeliterally nothing he recalls was what actually happened..
0 likesOver a parking spot? Insane.
0 likesThe fact that just about any idiot can walk around with a gun is a real problem. The situation only arises because he knows that he’s armed.
8 likesReplies (2)
His first problem was walking up to the car. When you’re armed, you still try to avoid any type of confrontation. If he would have just minded his own business, everything would be fine. Nobody would have gotten hurt, and this moron would be still walking around armed.
1 like@1jayteeemel I wish he would have done that. Clearly his mentality was to bait someone into a situation where he could plausibly pull his firearm. Cowardly behavior if you ask me.
2 likesThis was a hate crime.
0 likesDid anybody else hear him refer to the mother of three as "probably smoking crack"?
Hell even #Mac from It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia gives an ocular pat down before taking action. 🤷🏼♂️
0 likesThis is example A.... Take the 5th, get your attorney! These guys railroaded him!
0 likesI am all for self defense, but this wasn't self defense. #1 - This guy should have minded his own business. #2 - Even if you get shoved to the ground, take a moment to assess everything. The victim was turned away in a non-aggressive stance and got shot. Unbelievable.
1 likeReplies (1)
You're on the ground for no reason, and someone else is obviously mad at you and God knows what can happen next, it's not so easy you know.
0 likesI'm not American, never touched a gun in my life. But...idk, is it that hard to aim for the leg? Isnt a shot in the leg enough to "neutralize" any " immediate threat"?
3 likesOne person dead, several lives ruined in a matters of seconds for NOTHING! HORRIBLE
0 likesHe obviously got medically discharged the the tree trimming front lines. They trim with M60’s.
0 likesI love seeing Drako get knocked off his feet!
0 likesdude just looked at him when he drew the pistol he should have ran wtf
0 likesLesson : Don’t ever be the Parking Police.
0 likesFuck, I am so happy to live in a society without civilian ownership of lethal firearms for self-defense.
2 likesReplies (2)
That wastns self defense. After the push there was no aggression behavior. His body language is relaxed and is even walking backwards
1 like@D2x I know that, it wasn't legitimate legal self defense use of a lethal firearm. I watched the entire video (a couple times). I'm just saying that having a gun in a dumb situation is a really, really regrettable thing sometimes (such as this).
1 likeI honestly dislike every single person involved in this incident, but the sentence is justified imo
0 likesGee, I just shot someone. Should I consult with an attorney? Nah, I'm sure the cops have my best interests in mind.
0 likesit's funny how he's coddling his arm and explaining his injuries when he just shot a guy. like, ever wonder how the other guy felt?
0 likesAnyone notice at the 28 minute mark his right hand starts to work again?
3 likesReplies (1)
that's a miracle shirt that he buttoned it in. Only 5,98 in selected stores near you.
0 likesHe was 100% in the wrong for shooting the man, he's not in the wrong for 'defending' himself. he was arguing with a woman, a couple meters away from her, didn't verbally threaten her, then her husband knocked him to the ground. If he wasn't shot dead, the husband could likely be jailed for assault. Not defending Michael's actions, the man didn't take a step forward and go to attack him like Michael said, and certainly didn't deserve to die. But he likely wouldn't have been shot dead if he didn't knock Michael down.
2 likesReplies (2)
True,but if that was happening to your partner/wife what are your first instincts??"hey can't we just get along?"
3 likesNo,it's who the fuck you think you are talking to my girl like that🥊🥋🤬
@ova lē fia poko you're proper solid eh
0 likesThe argument that the cameras aren't high definition is extremely weak. Almost irrelevant
0 likesIn my country it is illegal to fire a gun into a crowd of young people.
0 likes30:56 “What kind of twitch was it?”
2 likes“Duuuh hiptwitch!”
Update: He is at the Florida Columbia Annex Prison. Satellite shows he will be able to see the handicap spaces, near the visitors’ entrance, from the prison yard. Fence is about 40 feet from the parking area. He will be squinting to see the handicap tags on windshields. If you see his latest prison mugshot he is drenched in sweat...and he was complaining about Pinellas county jail AC being too cold. There are no AC or fans in Florida prisons. If you are unlucky enough to have your bunk on the sunny side of the dorm...the concrete wall gets vert hot.
3 likesReplies (1)
Lmfao 🤣
1 likeBest comment!!
19 minutes for a gunshot wound!
0 likesAs a Scot, I am horrified, yet again, that all these nutcases are allowed guns.
0 likesThis is why cowards shouldn't have guns..They shoot first ask questions later.
1 likeThe fact that he had pulled his gun on multiple people before is SCARY. Like he set off that day to kill someone.
31 likesMy best friend is in a wheelchair, and we never even use the handicapped parking spaces cuz we can do without it, and we think others may need it more. There have been so many times that the handicapped spots have been filled with those not needing it, and we just roll past them and smile. To us, that's enough to get the message across. NOT SHOOTING SOMEONE. Holy cow!
If you want to have a weapon you should have a lot more training on the what you can and cannot do with your weapon and if you kill someone without a real reason you should sign something that say you understand you will go to prison if you misuse your weapon. I would have said the guy who got killed should have not gone straight into pushing the guy he should have at least spoken to him. The guy with the gun gets his gun out maybe that is fine but to just shoot with out any warning or the fact the guy who got killed had no weapon show this guy either wanted to shot someone or did not have the IQ or skills to have a gun.
0 likesReplies (1)
Ohhh training will prevent criminals from being criminals
0 likesWow his lawyer was bad. Compared to the prosecutor, it's night and day.
0 likesA shove to the pavement does not justify shooting someone. But don’t lose sight that it was beyond stupid to shove someone like that who posed no immediate danger. Do that and you increase the odds of a violent response.
12 likes29:29 "all I saw was a man trying to do me"
0 likesWhy does the prosecutor refer to the victim as Michael and not Marquis towards the end of the video?
0 likesOver a parking space???
1 like2 lessons:
1 like- It was stupid for the guy to push him. Just don't do that.... nothing good is gonna come out of it.
- if your country is not at war; don't carry a gun. It's just dangerous. All of us have rage and fear in our heart. So it is very tempting to grab a gun if you know you have it. But your brain does not think of the consequences so fast. This guy has thrown his life because he made a decision in 1 second, based on the fact that he had firepower with him. If he didn't it would have been a fistfight and everyone would be at home the same night with their loved ones.
Replies (1)
Many good people are alive today because they WERE carrying a gun when violently attacked. This guy used very poor judgment.
0 likes“Expired” ?? Wtf damn.
0 likesIt's the "green eggs and ham" for me.
0 likesWhy only 20 years?
0 likesHe Shoulda plead the 5th... Speaking only solidified the fact he is an idiot.... u killed a man over a parking spot. Crazy shit...
1 likeThis is the first video of this chanel where I disagree with quite some of the given explanations.
0 likes“It’s not very polite to park here”. It’s not very polite to shoot people, don’t you think 😂
0 likesOh, it's not HD? If it's not HD then you betta get it outta here! NOT GUILTY!
0 likesamericans and guns. I'm in Canada, I don't need a gun, have no desire to have one. 25% of the population in Canada are gun owners. The laws for having them are much stricker. background checks are thorough, criminal record, even mental health issues are taken into consideration. We have our problems with them but nothing like in the USA!
0 likes"So anyways, I started blastin"
1 likeI don't get why people can't just mind their own fucking business.
2 likes19 mins to get to a gunshot victim smh
1 likeReplies (1)
my thoughts exactly
1 likenot the force multiplier
0 likesTo be honest if he just filed for assault he would have probably won in some way, cause that push was a unnecessary even if he was a hypocrite.
0 likesReplies (2)
How was it unnecessary? He was acting aggressive towards his wife that was just minding her own business. The husband had no context on the situation
0 likesBruh, that’s called assault, doesn’t make what way you make it. There’s nothing illegal about informing someone about legality of parking in a disabled space.
0 likesNow he's gettin his fudge packed ober a handicap sign!
0 likesThis is why I ALWAYS keep a secret yogurt inside my grandmother's mind.
2 likesLock him up for using the word negative instead of no. I hate that.
0 likesThere are lot of space to park the car..why is he quarrelling with the woman at the first place..🙄
0 likesThat defense was fucking terrible wtf was that😂
0 likes34:07 i thought that I got a notification for a moment ahah
0 likesZero remorse. This is an adult male. Ticking time bomb.
0 likesReplies (1)
So was obviously the guy who shoved him.
0 likesYou can see him put on the whole “my arm hurts” act when the detective first walks in to begin the interview. That waiting period after they took the cuffs off of him he acts fine, then suddenly when someone walks in he can’t even use the arm to shake hands. He deserves to rot in hell for what he’s done.
57 likesReplies (2)
you made me laugh so hard with that last sentence!!
2 likes27:26 just makes no sense.. or I mean it does... but then when altercations happen.. whaa? He could have pulled a gun... obviously wasn’t going to but he could have.. :/
0 likesOh and also he is fabricating the arm maybe but also you clearly haven’t ever fallen over hard. Or are young...
You’ll stiffen up 30 mins later and then be ruined for days... much like this guy is. He got shoved pretty hard unexpectedly to the ground... and he already looks like hammered shit.. ain’t no spring chicken is he.
He’s guilty because he can recall his actions almost perfectly which shows ( as well as him not confessing either ) that he was never scared for his life. It’s not instant at all and he just guns someone down really maliciously and thoughtfully/reasonably ... but bad reasoning... thoughtfully. Hahaha. You know what I mean.
As a handicapped person that needs a close parking spot I really can't stand the self appointed Handicapped parking police. Please don't be that person. Its not really helpful. You are not being helpful by confronting strangers and making them feel as if they are under attack. You don't know their story. I have been in situations where I was driving a friends car and I didn't have a placard and I used the space anyway because I was in pain. I also know if I got a ticket I would be able to protest it. If someone would confront me I would just wave my fake leg at them.
579 likesAnyway with this situation why is he going around packing a gun as he confronts strangers? Would he do it without a gun? Admittingly he wouldn't even though he recanted I think his original response was the truth.
He wanted a reason to use his gun and he was out looking for it.
Replies (12)
"I would just wave my fake leg at them" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 that'd end the confrontation real quick
55 likeslegend
It’s also a gas station where about every parking space is super close. It’s not exactly forcing a disabled person to walk from the back of a parking lot. He didn’t care about disabled people he wanted a fight.
47 likesMy step mom has MS and its really annoying when all the handicapped places are full, but at the same time a lot of these gas stations have really shitty handicap spots that just feel like they were thrown in to meet regulation. I don't even see a ramp anywhere near that parking spot. Unless there are no other close spots or the spot is in front of a ramp, its not worth it. Even then, you could just ask them to move their car like a sane person.
6 likesYeah I feel the same way he definitely instigated it and the guy stopped when he seen the gun.. also the victim was in the wrong to though you shouldn’t be able to push people to the ground for yelling at your girlfriend without expecting to get shot.. in my regular civilian opinion man slaughter is the appropriate charge
0 likesEXACTLY!! He didn’t walk in the damn store once! He went there looking for someone to give him a reason to use that weapon! So irritating!
6 likesdamn straight. looking for a cause to use his gun.
2 likesLol he probably just got the gun too
0 likes@EtelorveHc49 Um just because someone push you down , doesn't necessarily mean you should shoot them 😕 . When the guy take out the gun the victim was ready to back off . He could of easily just threaten him to stop with the gun.
5 likesIf you're REALLY concerned about handicap parking enforcement, then call the actual parking enforcement people! I think the guy was really just upset that there were strange black people at a gas station he goes to every day (also why tf does he go there every day??)
2 likes“ I had never been in this situation before” that’s the problem with people like this, if someone had knocked him on his ass a long time ago he wouldn’t have made it this far in life still acting like a fool. He was so surprised that someone actually stood up to him.
1 likeI don't confront them. I just call the cops and give them them the license plate number
1 like@EtelorveHc49 shooting someone for pushing you is a little overkill no matter the situation. If you can’t control yourself with a firearm you shouldn’t be allowed to carry one. As a man you get into physical altercations throughout your life. A punch in the face shouldn’t mean a guy loses his life. You can get beat up and just fight back without unloading your gun.
1 likethis guy freaks me out. he really believes that his interpretation of the situation justified his response, even though the circumstances pointed to him being the primary aggressor and didn't warrant such a response. It's a weird situation, that happened incredibly fast
219 likesReplies (26)
yes, he was the original aggressor, but the victim escalated it into a physical altercation; he should've de-escalated the situation, not shoved the guy. i'm not saying he's was justified in killing the guy, but tbh, if someone suddenly shoved me down, i'd be scared af that he was gonna start pounding me.
4 likesyou should watch the story of lukas strasser-hird, very sad and senseless
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZryGyYiU2U&t=1270s
@lang 1007 it’s not the victim’s responsibility to not get shot while he’s visibly backing off. it’s a bigger issue than that. this guy was looking for a chance to shoot someone and he got it.
18 likes@zooportal he wasn't backing off. he only backed off after he got shot. he went up to the guy and shoved him. he was also looking for a fight. he just picked the wrong guy, some trigger-happy guy that yes, "was looking for a chance to shoot someone." they were BOTH looking for a fight. the victim wasn't there to diffuse the situation, but to use physical force to intimidate the guy.
6 likes@lang 1007 "he wasnt backing off" . I am kindly gonna ask you to rewatch the clip at least 5 times and tell me the truth next time . The black man was just unfortunate to pick a fight with a kill-ready sensitive wussy . There was a WHOLE 2.5s of backing up . You can take from this that he just wanted to shoot his weapon . You cant say otherwise
7 likes@Sxiller you're not "kindly" when you insinuate i'm lying. YOU rewatch the clip, because he walked right up to him and shoved him without even trying to diffuse the argument. there was NOT 2.5s of him backing up. YOU rewatch the clip and tell me the truth next time.
3 likesi'm not going to go into this with you. i'll just agree to disagree.
@lang 1007 This is largely how I feel about this whole event as well. And I can kindof see how in such a moment, immediately after being shoved from behind with clear intent to harm you, any movement could be perceived as a further threat. I think Drejka was just acting on reflexes. Just my opinion but I think 20 years is a bit harsh all things considered... 15 seems better.
2 likes@lang 1007 There is no many ways around it, either you didn't watch the video or you are lying.
2 likesHe wasn’t the primary aggressor for the physical fight, although he was for the verbal one. I think his response was justified in my opinion
2 likes@zooportal how do you know that. Did you know him personally?
1 like@lang 1007 yes
1 like@Sxiller he took a step back that doesn’t indicate his no longer a threat. Maybe if he didn’t want to get into a fight that would potentially cost his life, maybe don’t go around shoving random people
2 likes@AFluffyWhiteKitty I think he should have been released
1 likeIn what way is he the primary aggressor?
0 likes@Sxiller "The black man was just unfortunate to pick a fight with a kill-ready sensitive wussy" He didn't pick a fight with him, he blindsided him and knocked him over. That was the 'wussy' move.
2 likes@lang 1007 No there was , it even said on the screen 2.5s . He took 3 steps back and turned his body towards the other side and then got shot straight in the heart, not even in the leg just went straight for the kill because he is obviously not okay in the head. You just don't want to accept reality and admit to being wrong...
2 likes@lang 1007 2:28 to 2:31 . Here is just evidence that you missed
3 likes@lang 1007 Here is also 21:00 to 21:08 that you also missed where it says the second and steps outloud
1 like@Tyler Shea Here is also 21:00 to 21:08 that you also missed where it says the second and steps outloud
1 like@Tyler Shea if you think he should’ve been released, I know not to take anything you say seriously.
1 like@lang 1007 he WAS backing off before he got shot. please rewatch the video because you clearly missed that part.
2 likesTo those who missed it, the victim AND the witness saw the guy on the ground pulling his gun and both started backing the fuck away. The shooter said in the interview that the victim twitched and he shot him.
0 likes@Matías Fernandez I think you didn't watch, he clearly pushed him and got shot after
0 likes@Louis G I did, you should listen to the closing argument of the prosecutor. When he took the gun out the situation was defused, You can see it in the video, you have the right to defend yourself, not to avenge an offense.
0 likes@Matías Fernandez Sorry, made same mistake somewhere else. Indeed he pushed ,walked towards him ,saw the gun, clearly stepped back and only then got shot. There was enough time to realize the treat was "neutralized", no need to shoot
0 likesit's not weird. it's the problem with being able to own a gun without education. he knows nothing about why self-defense and gun laws are implemented much less how to interpret them.
0 likeshe did back off, there's no arguing that, but ONLY after he saw him reach for a gun. the wife didn't need to get out of the car either. they're both hot heads. i can't say for sure, but in most cases that shove would've been proceeded with kicks and swings. if he was okay with blindsiding a guy and pushing him from behind to the ground, he'd be okay with any other hits he could get in.
0 likesThe way he's faking his shoulder and arm injury is so cringy.
1203 likesReplies (15)
I kno I was like, come on dude ur a lil ridic
31 likes@Katy Bug65 he does not look like riddick, kinda weird bro
14 likesAnd he sometimes forgets that he's hurting, especially when reenacting the incident :')
55 likeshe leaned on his shoulder for the 45 mins he was waiting and the second they came back in the room...aww my arm hurts sooooo much
16 likes@natasha yeah hunny boo boo we are serious dudes phantom injury to draw sympathy especially when he shows the detective how he pulled his gun
4 likes@natasha your in agreement, hey that's my bad then... that was extrrreeemely very transphobic of you and it's not cool at allllll and I am totally outraged right now.🤬🤬lmao 👍😜😜
1 likeThat's a little far fetched, i've hit the ground on Rock solid road,Yes it is enough to do that.
2 likesFML i mean it was self defense in a way. A random dude attacked him from behind
3 likesBut he should not have shot the Gun he should have just haved point it at the Guy and if the Guy attacked him again he could shoot
2 likes@FML I know I shouldn't laugh, but.......
0 likesthug felt entitled to block a handicapped parking spot, violently attacked person standing near his car without warning, striking him to the ground, got his just pay in “hard currency” ... sh@t happens ... move right on, nothing to see here...
0 likesReally? Gosh dang it why do I believe everybody. I’m mad at myself. I’d be a terrible detective
0 likesRight??? I had a man twice my size pick me up, and THROW me onto asphalt hard as hell, and I wasn't as hurt as he's pretending to be. I was covered in blood. But I didn't wine about it...
1 likeIt’s not easy playing the victim after killing someone
3 likesFr 😂😂
1 likeThe dude cries because he misses his dogs. But no consideration for the mother and kids that miss their father. That he killed.
1535 likesReplies (44)
@highlandrab19 yeah idk what video you watched but the guy took several steps back after he had pulled out his gun and proceeded to shoot him while the dad was retreating...
90 likes@highlandrab19 plus you are telling me you wouldnt push a guy away from your WIFE if they are screaming at her? Would you just let it happen and submit to the situation? A push should not be justifiable means for a shooting..
94 likes@Luis Lozano try to think from the guys perspective, a much bigger man runs put and pushes you, he could've impossibly known what his intents where and likely panicked.
18 likesBut yes, shooting him was an unnecessary, but there really aint much to do.
@Drained ever heard of de escalation? That's what you do.
22 likesNot to suggest that this shooting is justified, but this is a good reminder not to put your hands on people. Dead guy made a huge mistake just the same.
19 likes@Drained i agree, the only thing thwt troubles me is he waited pretty long to shoot, well atleast in my perspective, could that have been enough time to assess the situation and realize the larger man was not approaching him anymore ? How much time has to pass for it to be considered unethical to shoot someone? 2,3 or is after 4 seconds way to long to then shoot someone? Horrible situation all together anyhow.
9 likes@Luis Lozano yes, any rational person could've probably assessed that the threat was gone when he backed up. But his intentions behind shooting were probably not to "Kill him cus hes black". It's very difficult to know what his thinking was. Maybe he was just insanely scared? Who knows, but dont be to judgemental on this man. Its america after all, and there aint really a barrier that keeps dumbasses from obtaining lethal weapons.
6 likess
0 likes@Drained The victim Did. Not. Have. A. Weapon.
19 likesWhat do you expect from dog people
2 likes@DivideBy Zero yes i am sure from my comment you can tell I don't understand some dog people , not all of them but this man for instance , he killed a human like his life doesn't matter he didn't even have any remorse for a whole ass human being I don't understand how he is capable of loving another life that is even less than a human ( dog).
1 likeI am all for being kind to animals and animal right and stuff it's cool.
I mean I'd miss my dogs too but I understand ur point. Plus I wouldn't murder someone just because they parked in a handicapped area smh
2 likes1:56 if you watch the vid closely, the real problem is created BY THE WIFE once the confrontation occurs. The WIFE exits her vehicle - perhaps after seeing her husband coming, perhaps not, but she endangers herself and husband by escalating the situation by getting RIGHT IN THE NUTTY GUY'S FACE.
1 likeAt first,I said the husband should have placed himself between his family and the nut, but there's no room. The man walks at regular speed before his wife plays the fool, and while he still didn't have to use violence and escalate things, the natural reaction of shielding his wife was taken away by the wife herself
The wife was determined that things would go badly
That said, the shooter should have just called the police and gave them the plate and never confronted strangers
@highlandrab19 He shouldn't have been messing with people to begin with, it wasn't any of his business. I never understand why people can't just mind their damn business. Dude was defending his family from a nosy idiot, he pushed him and then backed away when he saw the gun. He didn't threaten him any further and didn't beat him up. A push doesn't equate to gunning someone down.
6 likes@Drained what I don't think you understand was racist about his actions was the fact that he went up to the family's car (whom he could clearly identify as black), provoked them, then the moment they retaliate he perceives the father as a "threat" and assumes his actions before giving him much of a chance to react. we all know the stereotype that black men are "aggressive thugs" and this was the exact stereotype he projected onto the father, despite the fact that the father was only defending his family. you can hear it in his language when he's being interrogated, he even admits that all he had to go off was an assumption of the father's actions.
5 likes@godspeeding if i was a weak man getting pushed by a much bigger man, id react the same, whether he was black or not.
3 likesYour argument is stupud, he shot because he was a threat, but he overreacted.
@Jack Of Blades welcome to america, i didnt write the gun laws. Maybe im pathetic, but im just stating a fact whilst youre drowning in your own hateful emotions. Maybe his actions are unjustified
1 like@miguelitoven 👍exactly. Self defense vs retribution.
0 likes@highlandrab19 ummmm what I saw was a man got pushed for harassing a mans wife and the dude pulled out a gun and the man who pushed him backed away immediately and still got shot
2 likes@Crystal Coleman ok thank you for your service
0 likesAgree
0 likes@highlandrab19 tbh he kinda deserved to be pushed. He’s a weak manlet.
2 likes@Thobeka Ngwenyama as i said:
0 likes"THIS IS AMERICA" is it really that suprising, been 2 school shooting in a year nearby
@Thobeka Ngwenyama How many times does the "shoot in the leg" meme have to be debunked? The legs are home to many major arteries. If he gets shot in the leg, yeah good luck saving him when blood is coming out of him like a garden hose. There's a reason you don't shoot the legs.
0 likes@Drained This is like this everywhere. Shooting the legs is a universal stupid idea.
0 likes@Thobeka Ngwenyama Most Americans? Perhaps the criminal ones, who carry illegally obtained firearms.
1 likeThe whole point of an open-carry/concealed-carry is to be able to defend yourself when your life is being threatened. That doesn't mean idiots won't abuse it to kill somebody and claim self defense. Good thing the courts threw the book at him.
@DivideBy Zero LOL fkn baby
1 like@Mustaqeemah Oni sociopaths r more inclined to intensely bond with animals actually
1 like@drained you are offended by us calling a murder to a black person racist, you are calling us sensitive for accusing racism but you are the one offended for it being called racist.
1 like@drained even you Admit saying “welcome to America where no one gets shot in the leg” the American gun system is corrupt. Anyone can get a gun and shoot someone and half the time get away with it because it’s “self defense”
2 likesHad the black guy not unnecesarry pushed him nothing would have happened and he would still be alive today.
0 likes@highlandrab19 I’m gonna say what others have already said, DID YOU NOT WATCH THE VIDEO? The man shot took several steps back and retreated when the gun was pulled.
2 likes@G Ham it doesn’t ur right but it can.....oops
0 likes@Bob Marley you clearly know nothing about America
0 likesso so sad
0 likes@Drained do you have any sympathy, why are you defending this monster, if you was in this man shoes watching someone yelling at your wife someone that gave you a child, someone you love, you would prolly do the same, that man is a selfish coward I wouldn’t show any empathy towards that man, he killed him when he was backing off , That’s the same small minded thinking that ruins society.
1 like@Luis Lozano Dude wasnt near his wife.
0 likes@Drained cap
0 likes@Incubeau?
0 likesmaybe don’t violently attack people and you won’t get shot to death?
0 likes@Mike D yea
0 likes@G Ham nah it was self defense the guy shouldn’t have pushed him... it’s not racism
0 likes@miguelitoven He is an irresponsible weapons handler to say the least. But at least when he gets out he will never be able to possess a firearm ever again.
0 likesWhy I would care more about some random irrelevant guy instead of my own dogs?
0 likesSerious question.
Dude's like this are why I don't engage road-ragers anymore. I just move over and let 'em pass. Too many people out there who just can't wait to defend themselves....
767 likesReplies (44)
This.
14 likesstep dad had a gun pulled on him in OUR DRIVEWAY while selling a lawnmower.... things escalated somehow and my step dad said he needs to leave or he will be put into the dirt and the guy pulled a gun...... I hate people that cant wait to defend themselves. they look for any possible opportunity.
53 likesAnd the gun nuts want to arm everyone....
12 likes@Willy Bones he might have been more hesitant to draw his gun if there was a stronger possibility the other man (or his wife) had one and could return fire. Guys like this are only so confident with their guns because there are too many Americans that are afraid of or against owning guns. The power trip stops if everyone has the power. No, I don't own guns. I'm a truck driver, I can't have firearms in a commercial vehicle. I don't ever want to have to shoot anyone, and my truck is honestly way more dangerous than any pistol.
15 likesI had a guy in a pickup truck road raging at me, trying to get me to stop my semi by getting in front of me and braking. I just layed on my highway horn. He didn't keep it up, that thing is ridiculously loud.
11 likes@Cole Black Yep...trucks kill more than guns do. That dude was itching to cause a situation to shoot someone. As I understand it he got 20 years. Probably should have been more.
11 likes💯
1 like@BlurbyBoo sounds like step dad talked to much! Lol
0 likes@A Mo i mean maybe but he asked them to leave the property and they didnt. Once that happens i think he’s allowed to talk all he wants
1 like“Defend”
4 likes@Phatman420 HEAVY quotes around that
4 likes@Cole Black idk who told you that you can't have firearms in a commercial vehicle but it's not true. I've literally been searched with two guns in my truck and they just gave them back to me after they were done looking.
1 like"Defend" themselves
2 likes@Emperor Ziko state by state have different legislation and also his company may not allow ot
3 likesYup.
0 likesMERICA FUCK YEAH!
0 likes" just move over and let 'em pass. " - I wish all American drivers would do this. It should be done EVERY time. I've been living in the US for half my life and I still hate American drivers. Why do they hog the left/passing/overtaking lanes on 2 lane highways, rarely check their mirrors and be utterly selfish when driving? If someone wants to go faster than you, just move over and let them passed FFS. It's called driving courtesy but Americans, in general, never show any driving courtesy on he road. Most other countries do.
2 likes@Cole Black That is insanely incorrect. If what you are saying is true, there wouldn't be situations of people robbing gun stores, or shooting at cops, or robbing homes of tens of guns at once from known gun owners. Every criminal in the entire US pretty much knows there are more guns than humans here, and all these crimes happen anyway. The only difference if every single person here owned a gun would be more shootings in total and more retaliation shootings as well. (Example- Person breaks into your house, you shoot them, a week later you get a drive by on your house and your whole family is now dead.)
2 likesMost crimes (especially property crimes, like theft) are done by drug addicts, and usually while they are under the effects for drugs, or possibly in withdrawal. In case you have never seen or known a drug addict, they frequently lack logical thinking ability and the lack of giving a fuck about their actions. A homeowner with a gun isn't going to scare them, they don't care if they die (at the very least they don't fear dying more so than they fear not having drugs), clearly, as they are blasting street fentanyl up their veins 20 times a day. A good anecdotal example for this that I have is someone down the street always had a bunch of crazy pro 2a signs on his lawn, pretty consistently, this led to his house being TARGETED to be robbed, probably because they knew he had plenty of guns in there. They stole 11 guns from his house in total. (this was about 25 years ago or so, in upstate NY)
@Emperor Ziko huh, I was always told otherwise. Thanks for the information.
0 likes@rdizzy1 I'm aware of much of this information. But I was specifically referring to this case in particular. With this kind of person. He did not appear to be on drugs. He just seemed like he was itching for the chance to use his gun to "defend himself." HE might have been more hesitant to draw and shoot if there was a strong possibility he could be shot in return by either the man or the woman involved. Also, I don't want to make any assumptions on your stance regarding gun control. But from your words I take it that you may be in favor of heavier gun control. In which case, let me ask you this: who does gun control affect? In reality, who are the people that are mostly affected by laws preventing average citizens from buying guns through legal channels?
0 likes@Cole Black No, my personal beliefs are very left wing, more left wing than corporate dems, and you'll see more pro gun individuals when you hit the far left. I believe the cat is out of the bag here in the US, but I also believe that adding more guns to the mix does not make things better. More citizens with guns=more criminals with guns, it never ends.(There are over 200,000 guns stolen in property crimes every year in the US, and 80% of those guns are never recovered and are then in the hands of violent criminals) Almost all of the guns that are illegal and in criminal hands originally came from legal gun owners.
1 likeThere is no real solution to the shooting issue. If they wanted to enact strict gun control or regulations that had actual teeth and would have statistical beneficial effects, it needed to be done 50 years ago, it is far too late now.
@rdizzy1 Yes, you do have a point, and don't mistake me for being right wing, left wing, centrist, buffalo wing, none of that shit. But once again, I was mainly referring to the specific situation in the video, as well as situations like it. Had the victim been armed, or his wife, as well as if there were a more likely possibility that they did have a gun, there may not have BEEN any victims. THAT guy presents to me like someone who only did that because he thought there wouldn't be any real consequences. I'd say a strong possibility of getting turned into swiss cheese by the man he drew the gun on, or by his wife, would be a pretty strong deterrent. And yes, absolutely, there will always be people who get fucked up on meth, heroine, etc. That don't fear death because they don't even currently fully grasp the concept they could die. There will always be psychos as well. Ones who don't care if they die. But genuinely, if I ever had a kid, raised them, and sent them off into this fucking disaster of a world to work at a job, and get their own apartment: I'm going to feel a lot better if I know they have a gun and are able to use it effectively. Not just them, but my girlfriend, wife, boyfriend, husband, whoever the fuck I'm with at the time, I'd love for them to be armed, because I worry. Same with friends, family, etc. There are very few people I personally know that I wouldn't want to have a gun. And most of those are not in my life anymore.
0 likesLiterally. I'm not trying to have to defend myself for murdering some psychopath riding my tail, so I just pull over
0 likesSo you agree that an armed society is a polite society. Cool
0 likes@Willy Bones if you don’t want to protect yourself that’s your option, I’m not going to force you to arm yourself. Just don’t start looking around when evil happens to you.
0 likes@Slappy McFace Apparently the irony was lost on you.
0 likes"Defend themselves" when the only threat is to their masculinity.
0 likes@Willy Bones guess so.
0 likes@Slappy McFace If everyone is armed...that means all the nutcases too. The ones with anger issues as well. It'd be the wild wild west.
0 likes@Willy Bones who suggested we give everyone a gun?
0 likesits funny you said so
0 likeswhen you see he was arrested before on threatening drivers with a gun on the road for reason such as Driving too slowly ,Parking in handicapped space .Stopping at yellow light
that guy was looking for a chance to use his gun no matter what
I couldn't agree more. Not worth the risk.
0 likes@Cole Black well that's just objectively not true. People like this are hinged and crazy. they do not think that far ahead, quite the opposite. If more people would have guns, people like this would use that as a defence to shoot on sight, as they would see the "bad guy" probably carrying so he should defend people from this bad guy quicker! sooo no, more people owning guns would not help in situations like this or with people like this. other cases? I don't know, maybe it would help, im not against guns, nut i am against bad arguments.
0 likes@jukkis6699 "objectively" is a bit of a strong word in this case. If you genuinely think he wasn't thinking that far ahead, you're probably a bit naive. I would bet a lot of money that he thought about an "opportunity" like that ALL THE TIME. Fantasizing about it, thinking about how cool he'll look in news interviews, shit like that. This situation happened as if he planned for it to go like that, at least for the most part.
2 likesWell just dont shove some random dude to the ground from behind and you'll be fine lol
0 likesThey need a return on investment somehow, guns are expensive and these nutcases want a reason to use them legally and if they can, sound like some sort of hero in the process.
0 likesMe too. It just isn't worth it. Too many men like this, emboldened by the fact that they carry a gun, will act on the slightest sign of disrespect.
0 likesYep, same, I gave the finger to a guy once after he cut me off and he followed me for quite a while, that sobered me up, now I just curse in my car lol
1 like@Cole Black You're welcome. Idk why people always say this. Tons of truckers carry lol. You still have to obey local laws. If you're going to a state that doesn't offer reciprocity for your CCW, then you can't carry there, and your company can set a policy against carrying, but it's not a law, so the only thing they can do is fire you if they find out. Even then, that's mostly just big companies.
0 likes@Now as I was saying... Yeah but his company isn't the law. Only thing they can do is fire him for violating policy. If you don't tell them, they'll never know.
0 likes@Emperor Ziko I do know a fuck ton of shippers and receivers won't allow firearms on their property, so at the very least it could be inconvenient to carry.
0 likes@Cole Black btw, that's how it is with any private business that doesn't allow firearms. If they find out you're carrying, and they ask you to leave, and you refuse, and they call the police, and the police get there and you STILL haven't left, you can be charged with civil trespassing. Not even criminal trespassing.
0 likes@Emperor Ziko gotcha. Alright then, good to know.
1 likeDon't start stuff
0 likesDetective: “Did you like,,, ask him to back up?”
936 likesMicheal: oh of course not, why?
Replies (10)
I like your head
8 likes@fallout new vegas lonesome road dlc I like your head too :$
6 likes@kade stanford you two are destined to each other <3
34 likes@Timur1214 oh for sure, me and fallout new vegas lonesome road dlc make a great couple!
51 likes@kade stanford 😭😭😭
2 likesMichael; No, he was already backing up, so I fired into his chest !!...now can I get the hell out of here?! I need to feed my dogs...
8 likes"Why would i, he was already doing that on his own?"
4 likes"If I tell him to back up, then I might not get to shoot him :("
11 likes@Closet Pankin stoppp😂😂😂😭😭
0 likes@Baba Booey 😭😭😭😭😭😭
0 likesAll he had to do was pull the gun out. The guy was backing off. This wasn't manslaughter this was a straight up murder.
1032 likesReplies (32)
@A Real Religious Man still better than murder! 🤣
149 likes@A Real Religious Man You can pull a firearm with the full intention of shooting and then not actually pull the trigger when circumstances change. That's exactly what should've happened here. He was fully justified in pulling his gun. He was just assaulted and put into a very vulnerable position--he had every reason to "intend" to shoot the threat at that moment. However, as the gun came out, the threat instantly dissipated. At this moment, Michael should've reassessed the situation and not fired. That's not brandishing, but simply elevating your defense to match a threat. That defense just needs to adapt as the threat changes, though.
61 likesHe didn’t even need to that.
3 likes@blappinOncoppaz He wouldn't of pushed the old man if he knew he had a gun, that guy was a hot head who pushed him without knowing what was going on. With a name like that you cant talk about what's right and what's not anyway.
10 likes@Gunkanjima You do agree that it is right that the man who shot the other man is getting punished though, right? while he had his reason, you have to agree that the man who shot went over the top and just and killed somebody after he backed up and wasn't a threat anymore. I just want to know what side you're on, because i, like you, agree that he shouldn't be charged for murder, which he wasn't.
3 likesTell that to kyle hHhHa
1 like@matt smith put him in for life? Cant happen this america baby.
3 likesConsider the fact that from the downed man's view, it MAY have looked as though the standing man was turning to draw a gun. I know he didn't say that, perhaps the defense lawyer would have if the old man had just shut up.
1 likeAlso, most people take a step back to "wind up" a kick
1 like@blappinOncoppaz No, because now you've escalated the situation. Now others would be justified in pulling a gun on you. Best case scenario would have been to call the cops when the lady refused to move her car, he's not a traffic cop.
3 likesWhen you have no clue what you’re talking about, it’s better to keep your ignorant comments to yourself
1 like@Ricky Janzen This. The man he shot wanted non of it after Dreika pulled his gun out.
0 likes@harrod19 Is he pulling a gun or winding up a kick? and it usually doesn't take 3 steps back.
0 likes@J0kerclash perhaps not "usually", but it's definitely a possibility. I'm not betting my life in what usually happens. Someone's that violent with me and you'd better believe it's serious now.
0 likes@harrod19 If you're going to shoot first ask questions later then you're probably better suited not owning a gun to begin with; you create no possible avenue for de-escalation.
10 likesHe pushed him and waited, and when the gun was drawn he backed off, if he was on top of him winding up to punch him whilst he's down then it would be more reasonable, but that's not what happened, and knowing when to observe when the conflict is de-escalating is an important part of gun ownership, which is why what he did was classed as a crime.
Legally it couldn't be murder. Because, it was negligent and reckless. Not knowingly and purposefully.
4 likesThey would have most lost the case, because of legal definitions had they charge him with murder. They would have to prove he knowingly and purposefully killed him ( which would be almost impossible in this case). So it is better to charge someone with something you know you will win, then to try and stretch your luck and most likely lose.
Gunkanjima nah
0 likesM doesn’t matter her was backing off oh well
0 likesI've seen a video or two about someone getting knocked out while standing up, then die from their head hitting the pavement. A push like that is nearly attempting murder as well.
1 likeNope. Marquis the thug started the violence with the push. Don’t bring a push to a gunfight.
2 likesNot murder, but manslaughter for sure. Thug started the confrontation by knocking old man down. But you can't shoot someone that is backing away from you
0 likes@Francis Balfour Oh I don't disagree, he was clearly in the wrong. The guy did back up. It was okay for him to pull his gun out (even the prosecuting attorney said that) But it was not okay for him to shoot. He was looking for a reason to shoot, in my opinion
0 likesPwnagePanther5 yaaaaaa. Learn somethin
0 likesmatt smith No, it wasn’t murder. He was assaulted by a man. He defended himself.
0 likesOnly Americans can think that it is ok to aim a gun at someone for being pushed. Period. You guys have to change this absurd mindset. And change you stupid laws on fireweapon...or better...have some.
3 likes@Ricky Janzen I cant imagine a better way to describe this situation.
0 likesYeah but it is harder to get him for murder, I'd say it's better to almost certainly get him for manslaughter than to take the chance that he walks free by going for murder.
0 likes@Ricky Janzen he should have minded his business
0 likesIn the U.K this would have been a fist fight at best. In America it's bleeding to death in front of your children. What a freakshow.
0 likes@Jon Jackson You're not defending your wife because he isn't physically assaulting her. Verbal confrontations happen all the time. You'd be an idiot if you think him pushing the dude was justified. The gun pullout was.
2 likesThe problem with that, is it is a harder case to make and can be a possible "over charge". There are cases where people were over charged for a crime and the cases were dismissed or person was acquitted, but had they gone for a lesser charge would have gotten a conviction
0 likes@E H wait minute theres a video of him backing away. That makes the case right there. He lied in the interrogation saying the dude charged him.
1 likeAs a gun owner it is your responsibility to de-escalate and retreat confrontations to secure the safety of all individuals involved. You shouldn't own a gun if you don't do this.
71 likesReplies (9)
Enfant Des AMEN
3 likesSeems like they can't inhibit that since it infringes upon your rights..
0 likesWell, that doesn't really work out does it. It seems to me that you can only say someone shouldn't own a gun. But as you can see that guy cleared the "test" or whatever to carry a gun, then 20 odd years later he fired it and killed a person. I don't see how that is only his problem when you have a dead father on the other side.
0 likes@Pescatoral Pursuit "Baby-mama" ..?
1 likeFires And Flowers how is Mr Cee Gee “...promoting violence and death...”?
2 likesTAROT EXCELLENCE - cause he’s supporting a murderer, who killed a father in front of his wife and child for no reason. He tried to act like a father is out of line for protecting his family by shoving a threatening man away from them
0 likes@Pescatoral Pursuit or just start the sentence with "i'm a racist"
0 likesoblivion tenant are you telling me that you saw this the first time you saw the video? Or, did you reach that conclusion after stop, pause, rewind was used? If you used those things to come to your decision, you failed. The guy on the ground had 2.5 seconds to realize and react. He didn’t have the luxury of extra time like the people who are watching the video.
0 likesHow much can you accomplish in 2.5 seconds? Especially if you are in a heightened fight or flight frame of mind?
@TAROT EXCELLENCE none of these things justify what he did; merely explain. I doubt many people would say he probably wasn't afraid, but merely being afraid shouldn't give you license to end someone's life in a civilized society. Even if he were in fear of his life, it would be nonsensical to ignore the context of him just being pushed (which I know everyone in this comment section has been pretending is some tragically terrifying action, but, seriously, it's low-level assault at worst). If you react to being shoved with the use of deadly force, you should:
0 likes1) Not be able to own a weapon like a gun that gives you the ability to kill more easily
2) Be educated on reasonable force and force amplifiers
3) Probably get some sort of anger management or other emotional coping skills
LAWYER up people
0 likesthe way he stepped back when the gun was pulled, and didn’t take “one step” like Michael claimed is just awful.
849 likesReplies (55)
His body language tells a lot too
15 likesIt looked to me like he did pull his pants up and take a step toward him. Then he saw the gun and backed up 3 steps. So it’s a half truth
27 likesHe was stepping to him, before he saw the gun. In this situation you could overlook that the person is now actually reversed his direction. This is badly executed self defense, we shouldn't however forget who was the initial aggressor here.
31 likes@Zoop Defloop he took 1 step towards him and was still like 5+ ft away from him so it doesnt matter if he stepped towards him but once he pulled for his gun he instantly stepped back and froze dont defend this murderer one bit racist
57 likes@Twizzy lmao who’s defending him? I stated a fact. When I look at clouds I see faces, dogs, frogs. You probably see racism 😆 dude saying that he stepped to him was a half truth, you agree, then you make an assumption to put us in a victim state like everyone is racist, that type of victim stuff harms our community as much as racism . Gtfoh
33 likes@MyChannel it doesn’t matter that he got pushed he wasn’t in a life or death situation. He shouldn’t have even unholstered his weapon.
57 likes@Twizzy quit parking in handicapped spots then and don't assault people that could have weapons.
11 likes@Don't drink the Kool-Aid How about don't shoot people that are already backing up?
49 likes@Connor Brearley You probly never been blindsighted and tackled hard on the floor...can't believe these stupid comments from know it all persons that obviously never had a rush of adrenalite after falling to the ground, with blurred vision and buzzing sound...Ever heard of people dying when falling on the ground or being severly injured?
7 likes@Twizzy You do know that if someone is within 12 feet you can cover they can cover that distance within a few seconds and still take your gun, especially when you're on the ground. Even if you hit them a few times if you don't puncture their heart or their brain they can easily shrug off the pain especially with adrenaline.
2 likes@MyChannel No. It was not self defence. Pulling the gun was self defence. Firing it, when the guy was backing off, was murder.
24 likes@Don't drink the Kool-Aid Mmm. You’re dangerous.
3 likes@Bonesintheocean.mp3 Fucking hell. Pushing someone over now carries a death sentence. Shit, I missed that happening!
15 likes@François Gagnon Lemieux These comments are not stupid. They are based on facts and law. I take it you don’t trade in those things!
6 likes@Helen Webster its interesting to see their arguments from a non American point of view but also disturbing.
25 likesThe way i see it, woman parked where she shouldn't have, its a thing, whatever. guy thats larger than her comes over causing a scene about it, her man sees a threat to his woman and pushes him away... gets murdered.
There was not at any point in time a threat to that mans life to be shooting someone square in the chest. He couldn't wait to be 'defending himself'. This is a straight up murder and if these other commentors think parking in a handicapped spot deserves you to die then they lack a grasp on reality... and i have a disabled child, its not worth killing over. Take your knock for intimidating and verbally abusing a woman and walk away. He is not the law he is not above the law, if he had a problem its not his position to even confront, he has options to report it, easy, no life lost. She would get a fine and that kid would still have a dad! But from what i see in other comments there were reports of this man threatening others with his gun and throwing racial slurs, thats who they are defending and thats messed up.
@Connor Brearley Wrong, he was in his right to pull a weapon. Even the officer said this.
0 likes@Helen Webster he wasn't charged with murder.
0 likes@M Wilt how can people be so brainwashed? If you start shit and get hurt thats at the very least partly on you if not entirely on you. This over aggressive man got what was definitely coming to him. Starting fights with random people to protect your right to park wrong wasn't a recipe for a long life now was it?
1 like@François Gagnon Lemieux no lol
0 likes@Helen Webster Just so you know shoving someone onto a hard surface like concrete can easily kill or lead to serious injury of the victim especially when they don't see it coming like in Drejka's case, this sort of thing happens all the time. If the black guy didn't want to be shot then maybe he should have thought about that before assaulting/attempting to murder someone over a verbal dispute.
3 likes@MyChannel I know. In my view the guy was lucky to get just a manslaughter charge and the prick even fought that!
2 likes@Helen Webster Because it's much easier to remember the name of a guy who's name is literally in the title of this video that just so happens to be focused on him unlike the guy who was killed.
5 likesI am using black as a descriptive term because it's simple and concise and you know who I am talking about. Would you prefer me to draw my sentence out even more and sound ridiculous by saying "if the guy who was shot didn't want to be shot" instead?
@Steven Thompson neither did they know he was armed. Saying he is a racist is a mere opinion that is not based on evidence. The agressor, even if being an ass was not being dangerous until he was violently shoved on the ground.
4 likes@Don't drink the Kool-Aid whatt?? Maybe he shouldn’t murder people trying to defend their wives.
8 likesSo you’re totally cool with assault then? Different culture I guess
1 like@helena Don't run around assaulting people. You never know who has a gun on em, he started the altercation.
0 likes@Don't drink the Kool-Aid don’t defend murderers
5 likes@prahanormal and proud of it, I love my people
0 likes@Don't drink the Kool-Aid If someone is backing away from you once you draw your gun there is zero justification to fire. Look at the damn video. He starts backing away and is about to turn around. Very clearly was not going to charge the guy.
2 likes@Matt Sure. Then again if you don't assault people you don't have to worry about someone making a split decision with a gun.
0 likes@Dio A maybe he shouldn't have been creating an altercation over a handicap parking spot, and the black man wouldn't have felt the need to protect his family. You do realize we can spin this any way we want. Admit that murder is wrong regardless of that shit you're talking about. Like wtf. If he felt threatened he should've just left or even just pointed the gun at him as a warning. People that are too ready to kill someone maybe shouldn't have a gun. That's stupid. Stop defending a racist murderer (not saying he was racist just bc the guy he shot was black, but bc he's actually apparently racist)
5 likes@Don't drink the Kool-Aid if you dont start an altercation or argument maybe you wont get assaulted. If you don't go to the store, maybe you won't run into crazy people. If you don't live, maybe you wont have to deal with bad people. That's a continuation of that kind of logic. That's stupid, and thats literally blaming a victim that got shot. In the video he said he knew that by approaching the car, he knew he could've started a serious altercation, and that he chose to still continue. So how are you blaming the black guy for protecting his family and not the white guy for starting it all?
4 likes@What If If you don't park in handicapped spaces & break the law then you won't have to worry about any confrontation. Why not just park in a regular parking space if you want to avoid confrontation?
0 likes@Don't drink the Kool-Aid No, trigger happy people just exist. You can try blame the victim here as much as you want to, but it’s not his fault.
2 likes@Matt And people that break laws just exist. Don't break the law if you don't want potential confrontation.
0 likes@Don't drink the Kool-AidI guess no one has looked after you like that. Pulling out the gun was okay but firing it was evil..
3 likes@Vintage Gamez Once again this all could've been avoided had they not parked in the handicapped parking. Somebody broke the law 1st and it wasn't the shooter.
0 likes@Vintage Gamez He was defending his family by assaulting someone with their back turned towards him? Did the shooter assault his family before the altercation or were they just having words?
0 likes@Don't drink the Kool-Aid the way you said previous stuff made it seem like you are trying to justify what the dude did simply bc he parked in the handicapped place which was surrounded by free spaces to park, I would understand the upset if everything else was occupied but there is literally a free parking spot like 5 meters away
2 likes@M Wilt he was murdered, because he decided to assault the man instead of using his words
0 likes@M Wilt yeah, you're definitely not from the states if you're surprised by the parade of bigots trying to justify obvious hate crimes. This man instigated the confrontation, intimidated a family, and decided to shoot his gun and kill a man over a minor physical altercation. They'll argue till they're blue in the face about how justified this shooting was, but they're not interested in justice or they'd accept the guilty verdict. No, they just want to either live out their Frank Castle inspired vigilante fantasies either in person or vicariously through another so they can punish the thugs, (i.e. black people) in their neighborhoods. Anyone claiming that this man was acting in self defense or that the father deserved to die is just a violent bigot upset the system did not protect the racist.
5 likes@Steven Thompson aggressor/victim can swap in an instant. the second the man pushed him, he became the aggressor. the second he stepped back, he became the victim again
1 like@MyChannel i think he just pulled the gun and shot because he was scared. but if he wasnt so worried about people parking in a handicap spot being a vigilante this wouldnt of happened. the guy shouldnt of pushed him either. its just a bad situation
1 like@Twizzy for one nothing he said was racist at all people need to stop bringing race into everything it’s unrelated and frankly stupid and he’s not excusing shot he wasn’t 5+ feet away he’s just saying we do need to look at all the details the guy was the aggressor and was obviously about to beat him up pulling a gun out was the right choice I would argue but he didn’t need to shoot the threat was enough to make him back up
0 likes@Progressive Politics & Cannabis Culture don’t assault people seriously keep the argument verbal it was wrong of him to shoot but in the case of bodily injury it was right to unholster his weapon and again if you don’t want to get shot don’t commit aggravated assault don’t want to lose an eye don’t take one don’t won’t to do the time don’t do the time etc and it’s amazing that half the people condemning him only see color and choose to see it as racism and not the clear AGGRAVATED ASSUALT that it was
0 likes@François Gagnon Lemieux he had enough time to assess the situation, he thought he was some type of hero and that gun gave him too much confidence. He’s an idiot serving 20 years, cope harder.
0 likes@Father Father I am not saying the guy is not an idiot, I guess everyone has this kind of neighbors that is a prick a d annoy the neighborhood watching at every little insignificant things happening in the neighborhood. Still, I find it unfair to say he had, without a doubt, 100% certain, that his intent was murder and not to defend himself after being savagely pushed to the ground. The guy should have minded his own business but it was never reason enaugh to agress him by shoving him this hard on the floor. Being shoved like that on the floor and having a gun on myself, there s a good chance I'd use it too if I don't understand ehat is happening. 4 second is not much to assess the situation, but look at it, the guy that shoved did raise his pants and was about to move forward on the older guy while he was getting up. He only did start moving toward for a brief moment until he noticed the guy was pulling a gun, then he stopped and backed out.
0 likes@Connor Brearley I disagree I think it’s totally fine that he pulled his weapon. A guy who was much bigger had just shoved him to the ground and initiated a physical altercation. Now he should never have pulled the trigger that was absolutely unjustifiable
0 likes@Zoop Defloop if calling out racism makes someone a victim.....wouldnt that mean the system of racism, and the people who perpetuate it, CREATE victims? could I dare say that...racism victimizes people??? gasp
0 likes@Helen Webster exactly
0 likes@Infamous News I'm not talking about other cases I'm talking about this one, and he only pushed him because he defending his wife and kids. What would you do if you felt like someone was threatening your family? They both overreacted but he only pushed him and he didn't have a weapon so they was no need to shoot him point blank period. Some people are scary af and they don't need guns if they are gonna kill people over a parking spot.
1 like@Michaela Jenkins that’s an irrelevant tangent. He said I was racist for my factual comment, that delegitimization real racism. When you call every little thing racist then it loses its meaning
0 likes@Twizzy RACIST? Why? How is that even racist?
0 likes@MyChannel if you getting pushed is a "life or death" situation after walking up and inspecting someone's car when
0 likes1. Not your property or place of employment
2. You are not a law figure, you have no arresting rights, therefore no approach reason.
Are you just blatantly racist or..
@Zoop Defloop that’s the thing boo. we live in america. every little thing is racist 💀 it has been bread and ingrained into every aspect of our lives. you’re in pure denial if you don’t think so. racism can’t be made illegitimate bc it is a self sustaining system. but go off i guess
0 likesI saw a pretty bad accident one day on my way to University, a young woman ran a red light, and hit a pedestrian who was crossing. She hit him hard man, like I don’t know anything about vehicular accidents, but I was starting to cross when he was already in the middle of the road, and to my eyes it looked like she was going at least 60 when she hit. It could have been less? I don’t know, it was intense. He flew onto her windshield and bounced off pretty far. He was pretty fucked up, but still alive, even from my viewpoint I could see his head moving, eyes open, but his arms and body were twisted pretty bad, and I saw blood on his face.
570 likesI called triple 0 and left, watching this stuff irl just feels to morbid for me tbh. But, before I left, all I remember is the utter despair of the driver, that young woman. She was sitting on the side of the road, screaming. She was convinced the victim was dead and she was devastated. Even though he was visibly alive. Like this is the only time I’ve ever seen anything like that, but her reaction is the one thing I always remember when I see these videos and I see the reactions the killers have when they are told the victim is dead. Faking that kind of instant and deeply guilty, traumatic emotion would be almost impossible, I’ve seen criminals try and again I remember that woman and her face. And that was true terror at herself for what she thought she had done, I’ll never forget it.
Replies (20)
So basically you admit to leaving despite being a witness? That's kinda a crime...
21 likes@Jenna Mattern they ask for your name and other info when you call triple 0… they can find them to use as a witness if they really wanted. if they didn’t call, then your comment would make sense
161 likesThere’s this impact video I watched before I recently got my license.
32 likesThat video made me cry, seeing victims who had successful lives, a family and one was a little baby.
Everyone needs to watch that video before they drive, I thought it was stupid at first because I already knew not to take my eyes off the road but after watching that video and crying for 30 minutes, I will literally never take my eyes off of the road nor run a red light.
I am not an emotive person and i don't know if I would scream or just staying silent, that's scares me because police could misinterpret my behavior :/
10 likes@Giacomo Culcasi No. There is a fine difference between faking emotion and genuine emotion.
37 likesI once hit the rear tire of a bicycle.. I was going very slow as it was a turn and swerved a little because a bike came out of nowhere. Anyway the man on the cycle fell down, no scratches or nothing. I made sure he's ok and apologized so much. But just that shook me up so much and I felt such remorse..
20 likes@Jenna Mattern // it was a busy intersection, there where people everywhere, when I called emergency the person on the line told me they already had a few other ppl on the line calling about the same accident and she asked me to hang up after I gave her my name and number, there was cameras everywhere and the driver didn’t run. There was no need at all for me to stay except to stare at a person who was hurt badly. Having people gather around an accident only prevents emergency and cops from getting to it.
73 likesBut look, I know none of this matters to you at all, you just want the moral high ground right? Gives you a high, feeling like your telling someone off for doing something bad, right?
That’s kinda sad.
@SIMP POLICE hey now, no need to project your insecurities on the internet.
4 likes@SIMP POLICE Oh noooo. Guess I’ll die.
3 likes@SIMP POLICE I didn’t do anything you’re being a bit overdramatic.
4 likes@SIMP POLICE I did say I was gonna die? I don’t remember that? Show me where :)
3 likes@SIMP POLICE are you seriously liking your own comments lmfao
3 likes@SIMP POLICE Currently looking for therapists that might be able to help you, hang tight. Help is almost there.
4 likes@Mia I love that you posted this story and I love your response. I would watch your podcast. Lol
0 likesma vacagar
0 likesnot everyone reacts the same with faced with bad news. most men are taught since childbirth to suppress their emotions
0 likesNot to minimize what you’re saying but when I was like 13 this 16 year old was driving on my street and we had a husky that ran into the street. She killed my dog. It was not her fault and an accident she wasn’t speeding there was nothing she could have done truly. The driver was soooo upset crying as hard as we were and even tho my dog was dead I remember feeling bad for HER. Like she was equally traumatized as we were and it was just a dog
4 likes@Jenna Mattern That is not a crime if you call 911.
3 likesWhat are you smoking bud?
@Flaming Tacos Studios Another situation of “I have no idea what happened but I’m gonna say you were in the wrong anyway.”
2 likesNothing I said was hurt anyone, thanks for budging in though.
So sad... I'm almost certain I would end up killing myself.
0 likesJoseph Coffey, a tough New York City detective sergeant once said- “Everybody wants to tell their story. They are either proud of their actions or will say nearly anything to get out of the interrogation room. They can’t stop talking when they should keep their mouth shut. It is amazing how they hear: “ anything you say can and will be used against you…” and they just keep talking.”
65 likesReplies (1)
Im tough too 😎
0 likesThis guy probably leaves his house every day with his gun thinking “I cant wait to defend myself”
17181 likesReplies (263)
Exactly. Now he gets to defend himself in prison. But now he has no gun. Uh-oh!
468 likes@box
41 likesWhat kid ?
@box lmao, interesting inference, kid.
130 likesThere’s some people who are just straight up looking for trouble. I know it’s not really a popular opinion considering I’m mostly pro 2a, but some people should just not have guns, period. Hell, I see people in my day to day life that shouldn’t even be allowed to drive a car.
328 likesMy thoughts exactly
2 likes😂😂😂
1 likeNot probably, but definitely
3 likes@Cheeto.
37 likes“I’m a big, strong guy! I can park wherever I want and assault whomever I want to when I go to the gas station! What’s the worst that can happen?!”
Lolol
yeah bro ur probably right
1 like@box the man was protecting his family by shoving him to the ground, he never stomped anyone's head into the pavement, wtf are you saying. Then he takes several steps back afterwards and still gets shot. The fact that you're defending this dude for shooting a person while unarmed and retreating is so stupid and ignorant.
202 likesYou are EXACTLY right
1 like@hearteater FOR REAL how tf did this guy get to that conclusion???
3 likes@G Victor the guy was still in the wrong
10 likes@box wait where and when did the stomping happen
39 likes@box show me the time stamp of the head stomping. I missed it
60 likesScary concept for sure!
0 likesAs a very strong believer in second amendment rights, I agree. He had no reason to fire when he did, if he pulled the gun and the guy continued charging, then he could’ve shot. But I think he fired a little early and this mans life could’ve been saved. Very sad
18 likesI know several people who carry. But one in particular absolutely can't wait to use his gun. It's just a matter of time before he does.
18 likes@Uomo Americano Yikes! 😬 That dude’s a total meathead. I carry myself and know plenty others who do as well: NO ONE goes around hoping they’re put in a position to even have to CONSIDER unholstering their firearm defensively.
20 likesOhhhhhhhhhhhh yes
0 likesexactly... and sadly many around just like him in the good old USA.
7 likesThat's exactly right, I think. I think this is the type of guy who fantasized about this and unconsciously made it happen in some way.
12 likes@M Star idk who you’ve been interacting with but everyone i know who carries has the exact opposite mindset lololol
0 likes@box lmao 🤣 that dad was minding his damn business what is wrong with people. The man was asking for it
10 likesA good chunk of these gun nuts do
2 likes@steeveejee thank you for talking sense. Any responsible gun owner understands trigger discipline and how you don't touch the trigger unless your life depends on it. His did not.
14 likes@G Victor that's not how that works. You don't get to shoot an unarmed man like this. He was standing there with a gun pointed at him. He had already won the fight, he just wanted to pull the trigger.
27 likes@John Morin so if the couple in question we’re parked illegally and this man confronted them and they were to shoot him, would it be this mans fault? He has no authority to confront them, but put himself in that situation. Should the people who shot him go to jail or is it his fault he put himself in that situation? Your logic honestly doesn’t due the case any justice.
6 likesI’m gonna defend my life, I’m gonna make sure to defend myself outside your house and place of business. I’m willing to go to the depths end to defend my life which is why I carry everyday im just itching to defend myself
1 like@box wtf
2 likes@box He certainly was assaulted first. But there's this word called "excessive". Due to the evidence of the camera an entire room of people agreed "he was not in danger for his life and shot a man who decided to back up after seeing the gun" These things happen fast and it may seem like a foreign concept to you but you can't just claim self defense, you have to actually be in defense for the sake of your life, not in defense because your ego can't take being pushed. In no way was that guy going to stomp that guy's head.
27 likesThe way it played out(on film I might add) was he got pushed, guy took a step towards him, he pulls out his gun out of fear, then the big problem is the guy saw the gun and backed up, he decided to shoot him while in control. That's the problem. So that you can carry this lesson and don't catch a murder charge, once you seize control of someone who pushed you to the ground, you have zero right to pull the trigger. This is proven in this court case alone but I mean I implore you to not test the theory. Biggest lesson from this you can take is don't antagonize people when you have a weapon. No matter what happens just that start point alone is something the court will consider with your case. People like that appear as a danger to everyone else, not just the guy that pushed him. If he would have simply drawn his gun and called the cops he could have gotten the guy who pushed him a battery charge. But nope, he seemed to want to play this out to shoot him.
"I wish someone would punch me or something so I could shoot"
1 like@John Morin You can't start a altercation and then claim self-defense
9 likes😂😭😭😭😭
0 likesBasically
0 likesI know right? I mean who goes to the local store for essentials and carries a gun?
1 like@M Star My experience has been the opposite; the gun owners I know are professional, safe and considerate; but I suppose it depends on who you spend time with.
1 likeYeah. I remember arguing with my dad about this guy. I felt Michael was 100% in the wrong.
3 likes100%
0 likes@box the most GOP comment i have seen today
7 likes@serpens8 you’re oooozing racism
6 likesWe LOVE when people identify their true selves 😂
he'd make a good cop
0 likesIf you end up having to pull your pistol or be killed it's gonna be a hell of alot more hectic and unpredictable than this... with more of a chance of you being killed. If you have any sense you pray it never comes to having to pull a gun.
1 likeI love guns. He I'd be tickled if you could buy a full auto at Walmart, but there's a few folks that don't have enough respect for em replying here.
Probably? More likely than not? How do you know his thoughts? Do you know him personally and he confess that to you?
0 likes@box lol this
0 likesMy thoughts exactly.
0 likesLET'S GOOOOOOO FREE MICHAEL
0 likesThen how he shot no one for like 25 years of carrying? He said he never had to use his gun before, he didn't fight with anyone, he never got attacked before.
2 likes@thatmaninblack He lied. Bottom line. The guy he shot was backing up. Period. Surveillance footage shows he lied. That matters.
11 likes@Lost In Soho : Not necessary. I got attacked a few times. I was stepping off the bus, then someone did kick me in the head from behind. I did catch the person's clothes. I was almost blacking out, I had no idea if he was armed, if he had a knife, if he was retreating, if he was planning to attack me, I have barely seen anything for like 30 seconds, my jaw almost broke. It was not a fun experience. So maybe the guy had something like that, if he injured, people had to make really fast decisions during a physical attack.
3 likes@John Morin then why do we have a court system? How far do you take thos logic? If he was a vegetarian then he wouldn’t have needed that 7-11 beef jerky? bottom line, he got himself killed by wanting that Slim Jim?
0 likesKyle Rottenhouse Coward type act
3 likes@The Notorious Artorias guns aren't allowed for civilians in the rest of the 1st world countries and they work just fine with way less violent crimes than the US, and way less police violence. Ppl gon tell u that guns getting taken is stripping you of freedom, but i'd say the opposite. As a Swede, I would feel very unsafe and not as free if everyone around me were carrying guns
2 likes@steeveejee in norway, not even the police carry guns. It's no coincidence that police violence, and criminal violence is very low there. MUCH lower than the US. Norway and finland are very similar, and their crime rates are very low too. These are all in the top 11 most free countries according to the state of liberty index. The US falls 15th. Guns strip people of their social liberty, as you always run a risk at getting shot
3 likesMiss me with that "tHey'LL tAkE ouR fReEdoM awAy" bs
Yup. He just wanted to use his gun.
1 like@box who? Yeah, he shouldn’t have shoved the man, but one should lose their life over one moment of defensive (in his mind, righteous) anger.
0 likes@Russ Mess it’s an opinion. He did soften it with probably. He didn’t make a declarative statement of fact. .
0 likes@Anonymous i agree
0 likesWhen the only tool you have is a hammer every problem is looks like a nail. When I carried a gun it seemed like every day there was a time when I thought I was going to have to shoot someone. Then when I didn't have it the situation changed. And made me wonder if it caused a change in way I was acting to bring the situation on that way. So I don't carry a gun
6 likes@Sophie Burgess Glad you have it all figured out. Its a shame that we cannot just call this for what it was. A sad situation. You could blame them both but in the end shit happens. They did what they thought they had to do. Only thing left are the consequences.
1 like@John Morin so people who park in a handicapped stall should die? I think you spelled your last name wrong. There's an i instead of an o.
1 like@box
0 likesA man was murdered and the other man in question did the killing, don't get it twisted.
@G Victor the guy park illegaly to complain about someone else park illegally...
2 likesBut yeah you are right Victor
@Bob Thompson no one should tbh
0 likesIt seems as if he only pushed him after he was yelling at his wife.
0 likesYeah probably
0 likesSounds familiar...
0 likesgood...
0 likes@86Corvus no that's the issue with people having guns
0 likes@30 -0 It's not okay but you don't shoot someone after the fact like that. Even you should understand this.
1 like@Emanuel a Swede in the depths of YouTube calling for no guns with the name "anonymous". Yall weren't just scared in WW2.. it's really a hard wired core principle ain't it?
2 likesDreaming of a shootout at Subway!
0 likes@The Notorious Artorias I agree with you, that not all people should be gun owners. That and improper handling and storage is my only problem with gun ownership. There's a concealed carry deaths by state report that I read over the summer that supports my 'handling and storage' comment. A lot of people leaving guns where the kiddos can get them as well as people playing around and accidentally killing friends and family. It's really sad.
1 like@Chad Kirk These wannabe badasses always embellish what happened. It's good that there's video.
1 like@thatmaninblack He had 4 instances of threatening people with it, so this was inevitable.
1 like@daniel bloedorn Imagine if this dude went all around town all day killing people in handicapped spots without a placard. He's probably one of those people that confronts people parked legitimately in handicapped spots that have "hidden handicaps".
1 like@Schmoopy Von Boopy : I have doubts. If someone threatens people with guns, that person can't keep his carry license and probably get a jail sentence. (If those events were not self-defense situations.)
0 likesYep. Too many people like that with firearms.
0 likes@BB -8 aww I see my comment was censured
0 likesWho do you think the over whelming majority of gun crimes are committed by year after year ?
@Dylan W
0 likesWhy censored?
Because mostly the wrong people have guns. And it will remain that way until they invent a trigger a criminal can't pull
@BB -8 Bc social media carries a liberal bias & they have algorithms to automatically delete anything based on certain keywords. Usually involving statistics & race
2 likesHe will not have to do this for the next 25 years and when he gets out he will not be able to own a firearm.
0 likes@box please provide a link to the video of him doing that because from what i saw was he pushed him then stop and yelled at him, but at the end of the day if jackass with a gun didn’t yell at a stranger and their kids being a male Karen this whole incident would never happen, but I guess by your logic he is allowed to bully anyone and if someone dare stand up to him he is completely in the right to kill them.
0 likes@Andrew Crenshaw Actually he failed to defend himself, he was injured on February 11th 2020 by another inmate XD
0 likesThat's my main concern about gun carrying. I'm a strong believer that gun shouldn't be legal anywhere. Less guns, less accident and less ego fight turning into kills.
2 likesHis Favorite movie; Taxi Driver
0 likes@box Wait what happened that's making you liken him to people that curbstomp other people
0 likesBest comment
1 likeNot anymore.
0 likesYep, that's the vibe a get from him.
1 like@box ur such a drama queen dude he literally just shoved him
1 like@box u know him?did he tell you that he'd love to do that?bc if not, in the vid, all he did was get angry at the old fuck that was circling a car woth his wife and kid in it.
1 like@DeMond SWAGGERBOY hit the nail on the head here i agree with the batman reference and walking around ones car
1 like@G Victor you say nothing of value lost his kids Nd family valued him
0 likesShit! I commented almost the same thing. Then I saw this. So.... Great minds think alike, obviously. Lol!
0 likesYeh that’s Americans for ya
0 likesWow that's the same exact thing l was thinking .yes he's dieing to kill someone , not necessary black.
0 likesI thought the same thing.🤔
0 likesI find it odd for someone to sit up ileagaly in a handy cap stall being away that some tickets are over $300.00 .if l accidentally park in one & fine out.id get out of the stall so fast. I never got a ticket for parking in a handy cap stall.
1 likeI almost always agree with self defense, even with deadly force when necessary. But I have to agree with you. We’re less than 5 mins into the interview and he’s already using keywords like “21 ft rule” and “immediate threat”. Almost as if he’s aware of self defense terminology lol and let’s not forget he instigated this. He approached the car, he searched for handicap stickers, and raised his voice at a female. He got pushed once and pulled his weapon and fired before he even knew what was going on.
0 likes@box At which point did you see him stomp anything? I missed that part. Can you post a link?
0 likes@Andrew Crenshaw Yeah. Cant wait for the part two of this video called ‘Michael drejka drops the soap. Body language analyst.’
1 like@Sheik Bombalot foreal that’s why he dead. He honestly had that coming
0 likes@Silent Life ok well when someone attacks you. You don’t know if they are armed . Second of all you don’t have time to let them beat you up more or wait to find out if he is armed or not. Yeah that’s why that sob dead
1 like@Erica Mercado the fact is. . . HE started the entire confrontation. . . If you come out the mall and see someone walking around your car and arguing with your mom or sister in the passenger seat you're going to walk up quickly and see what the problem is, because he's clearly not a police cop so . . .
1 like@DeMond SWAGGERBOY he didn’t come to see what the problem js thoe he came like it was MMA league
2 likes@Erica Mercado yes because there is an adult male yelling at his girlfriend 😂, what kind of pee wee herman man is going to walk up and be like "excuse me kind sir, what seems to be the problem???". . . It's bound to be a fight in this scenario 85% of the time. . . No man is going to watch another man yell at his woman, it's basic male instinct 🤷
1 like@Erica Mercado doesn't change the part where the man took several steps back and the part where he was unarmed.
0 likes@Silent Life too late. And how was he suppose to know he’s unarmed or that he wasn’t gonna attack him? Hmm yeah lesson is don’t assault people
2 likes@DeMond SWAGGERBOY a man who would of lived another day in life/ a smart Man would of
1 like@Erica Mercado maybe he knew he wasn't gonna attack when the man took several steps back and turned away. What's he gonna do pull a gun out and shoot him without looking? No one's saying the push was deserved but the murder to any sane human was far far far less deserved, hurts way more people than a push.
0 likes@Silent Life na honestly can’t pitty stupid people. Don’t mess with the bull if you don’t want the horns
1 likeExactly since most of this guys were cowards through out their lives they grow old and frustrated because they never felt like a real man so they go out looking for a fight and an excuse to pull their gun out to feel like the man they were never able to be without a weapon.
0 likes@G Victor YOU Victor, did your homework ! 😎🇺🇸
0 likesSad but true!!!!
0 likesTo have obtain concealed weapons license and to go through any gun safety course, it's made very clear that to pull your gun and shoot someone your life has to be in immediate danger. Meaning a gun needs to be pointed at u, a gun needs to be fired in your direction or a lethal weapon (like a knife) must be in a life threatening distance. U can't have a better example then this video.
0 likes@F Trakk so True!
0 likesHe has rights to do so.You have as well so far.
0 likes@أبو ليلى He didn’t tackle him at full speed. What’s wrong with you. Look at the video again bro.
0 likes@أبو ليلى It is not alright to forcefully push someone to the ground for arguing with your wife. Gun dude should of called police to have the guy charged with assault. Instead he took it into his own hands and murdered the guy. Hope he is enjoying his time in the pokey. If you carry a gun, you better know under what circumstances you can use it. He did not..
1 like@Silent Life God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
0 likes@cxauo God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
0 likes@I Was A Saint God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
0 likes@I Was A Saint God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
0 likes@Little Death God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
0 likes@Shane Allder God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
0 likes@Nicholi Larson God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
0 likes@it's ok you’re very slow
0 likes@Silent Life I dont believe you can just shove people when your wife questions what thier doing cause they are nosey.
1 like@Jon Campbell how do you think a woman or a cop wouldve responded to someone questioning thier action then shoving them lol
1 like😂😂
0 likes@it's ok he s just playing smart with the baby brain he has
0 likesThe dad was obviously an angel
0 likesWhether he does or not doesn't negate the fact he got assaulted by a guy in the wrong, so defended himself
1 like@The Notorious Artorias Id take it farther and say that everyone should be able to own a aircraft carrier, exept politicians and crazy dudes
0 likesExactly what I was thinking...everyday he sees ""people"" park in the handicap space and today he was gonna defend the parking spaces and himself, even if it's cost's the other person their life😰
0 likesWould he have cared if he wasn't carrying a gun? I don't think so
Wel no more baby mama drama for him
0 likesConfronting them was only an issue because he used deadly force unnecessarily. It helps to establish that the defendant wasn't considerate of any harm that might befall anyone else because of the interaction. The prosecution even brought up how the defendant had every right to pull his firearm.
0 likesIt's your line of reasoning that doesn't stand up to any scrutiny. If you shoot an unarmed individual as they are fleeing, you've lost any hope of claiming self-defense. It would not matter if the roles were reversed. It obviously isn't justifiable.
@Steve Rogers Ha also likes the series Florida vigilante man and the mini-series force multiplication.
0 likesSadly I know people that do that
0 likes7
0 likesexactly
0 likeswe have the same icon yo
0 likes@G Victor right so getting pushed to the ground after you were circling someone’s car and arguing with their wife is enough of a reason to kill someone? He could have taken the gun out if he feared for his life and not shot. The other man clearly backed up once he saw the gun so this man had no more reason to fear for his life. And seriously dude? Saying the guy was a nuisance so that’s enough to kill him? What about this man that was going around everyone’s car and threatening them for being parked in the wrong spot?? He wasn’t a nuisance and a murderer that should get locked up?
0 likesRight like a punk coward 🤣
0 likesExactly. There is a subset of gun nuts that have a hero/martyr fantasy and are just itching for it to come true. Most gun owners with self defense reasoning for conceal carry hope to never have to kill someone. The video is pretty damning by itself but the history this guy has is icing on the cake.
0 likes@Silent Life woah dude déjà vu
0 likes@Andrew Crenshaw good. He will very soon learn that his tough guy attitude won’t help him at all, the prison guards certainly won’t help him as he’s assaulted in prison. Just like the child and mother were unable to do anything.
0 likes@box What's that from?
0 likes@Clint.Beastwood it depends if I’m in the streets and some dude is getting tough on me over something dumb like a parking spot I’m not gonna get tough on him and hope he doesn’t have a strap on him
0 likes@box did you watch the video?
0 likesFacts.
0 likesIm sure he and EVERYONE who has a heart beat leaves their home, thinking, i do not want to be a victim today.
0 likesnot anymore....
0 likesLightoftheWest7 Bruh ya’ll really not understanding his sarcasm. He’s pointing how ludicrous that assumption would be of the dad that was shot.
0 likesWikiHowFrog 903 How did none of ya’ll catch that he was being sarcastic. He’s highlighting how ludicrous it would be to assume the dad as intending to curb stomp someone.
0 likesOh he definitely did, like being pushed for harassing someone’s wife is something so many people would do. Even my dad would do that
0 likes@bonchidude he won’t be able to own a firearm legally anywhere? Is that how it works?
0 likes@Erica Mercado everyone ignoring that he attacked first instead of asking questions
1 like@Rei1sBa3 being racist is a compliment
0 likes@Silent Life protecting from what ? The guy was just arguing with his wife haha
1 like@Chad Kirk you dont wait for it to get to that point or it's to late
0 likes@box he shoved someone that was harassing his wife..
0 likes@Taco King it wasn't just "someone else", it was his girlfriend, no man is going to watch his girlfriend argue with a man without stepping in and saying something, the guy wasn't talking nice, so the black guy isn't going to walk up and talk nice either, not to mention this little issue called racism in America, racism makes it difficult for us to trust one another, white and black and vice versa... and the guy complaining is NOT handicap, it was not his duty to walk up to that woman and say anything, just call the cops 🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️, you cannot convince me that this man would've done the same thing if he didn't have that gun... this is where guns are a problem, they make people feel a little more tougher than they were without it🤷🏾♂️
0 likesHe's been carrying it around for 20+ years and in no place in this entire video did he once flaunt any sort of eagerness to use the weapon - it was more of a paranoidal stance if anything.
0 likes@Nicholas Hazel so do you think he would've been just as agressive without the gun? the man was not handicap, nor was a handicap lady waiting to get there at that time . . . so there was no reason for him to walk over there other than playing cop, just call the cops 🤷🏾♂️ ... they wound up being called anyway, this is the problem with guns america... they make people feel tougher and more confident in conflict than they are without it 🤷🏾♂️...i am 5foot8inches 135 pounds, but we all know i will win a battle against Mike Tyson or any other muscular guy if im given a loaded gun before we start fighting 😂...this is a PROBLEM that will not be solved in our lifetime.
1 like@DeMond SWAGGERBOY I agree with every word you said. Of course he wouldn't have reacted the same without a gun. I don't recall ever saying that owning guns was a good thing.
1 likeI said that he DID own a gun and he reacted in a way I can comprehend when he used it. Let's not conflate points here.
the fact that this comment already has 220+ replies says it all
0 likes@Rei1sBa3 Dude, just use it properly, even when you're trying to insult someone
0 likesLook at the time, it's glock' o' clock
0 likeswait, that's not normal?
0 likes@box where did you see him stomp somebody’s skull in? He didn’t even violently assault the guy he just pushed him to the ground and the dude pulled a gun
0 likesyup
0 likesI think the same way but doesn't mean im looking to kill. I mean it as i hope im around when a shooter decides to try something
0 likes@DeMond SWAGGERBOY so it's the duty to push someone to the ground for asking them not to part in a disabled spot and expect to not have any retaliation? my oh my
0 likesThose types usually do.
0 likes@Broke Man you don’t shoot someone for pushing you
0 likesWhy no one talks about the fact that the initial physical aggression was a massive overuse of force. He pushed him from the back on a concrete floor for a verbal altercation. People have fucking died for falling wrong. It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself. At least he helped society by terminating an animal.
1 like@box you right. i hate those people.
0 likes@Silent Life He should have been a man and said something instead of criminally assaulting the guy who ended up shooting him. Both overreacted
1 like@Mastershake His girl started the whole thing.
1 like@Daniel Flanard It was manslaughter
0 likesI'd call it murder if the guy who got shot hadn't been the first one to become violent
@AWAY By law, you can't put your hands on someone for yelling.
1 like@Michael Zomsuv if youre racist just say that and move on 😂
0 likesHe obviously was looking for trouble. Did he have a disabled placard or something? I think he saw the black woman and thought she was alone.
0 likes@Silent Life Put your hands on people, especially from behind over a verbal altercation, you could get shot.
0 likes@Silent Life The guy attacked by the entitled and ignorant bully, was probably terrified for his life, as anyone would be, given that some ignorant, law-breaking JERK just hit him over WORDS.
0 likes@pattioknows
1 likeLegally speaking, you're right, it was technically voluntary manslaughter rather than murder; I was using it in a less literal way. The intention of my comment was to restate what happened since a certain someone used racist stereotyping to attempt character assassination on the dead man that was ultimately victimized in the end. He didn't deserve to lose his life over some poor judgments because someone else had a bone to pick.
@Jim Bob He had no right legally to put hands on someone over words.
0 likes@Clint.Beastwood You are. Hitting over words is not justifiable.
0 likesYeah seems the type you see in the "Karen" videos...goes out looking for trouble!
0 likes@psychic function No justification exists for putting hands on.
1 like@CoolingOD A hard shove to knock someone down is VIOLENT.
0 likesI’m not from America myself so I can’t really comment on laws etc, but if your leaving your house with firearms then you are just looking for trouble... same here in UK with deranged gang members carrying knives for “protection”.
1 like@G Victor that doesn't give justification for murder, did you watch the video sweetheart?
0 likes@box whut? he didnt stomp someons head in lol he just pushed him and hten got shoot
0 likes@steeveejee i dont understand why americans be like: EvErYoNe ShOuLd HaVe AkS, and then they are like : WhY aRe We So DiSlIkEd, and : WhY aRe OuR PriSoNs sO FuLl
0 likes@G Victor H E W A S A H U M A N. you dont value human life? i do, thats why i (almost) a vegetarian, i dont want to hurt someone by not protecting them from global warming, (which btw is gona kill modern society becuse ppl dont take it seriusly)
0 likes@Pills Here Incorrect. 99.9% of the time, you're merely trying to make sure you won't be robbed and killed.
0 likes@DeMond SWAGGERBOY solid point! I did it once to an old, well maintained Opel Ascona (had plates of a club for old historic cars) and the driver relised I was admiring it. He low the window (I hadn't noticed him up until then) and let me to take photo of his car and showed me the interior venue of the car. However, I understood I was acting bizarre 'cause I felt a little ashamed of my indiscretion.
1 likeI carry a gun most of the time I go out, difference is I'm well aware of when and when not to use it, unlike MR Drejka here, yes the guy pushed him down but there was also a good 5 or six seconds after he pushed him that the man just stood there looking like he wanted an explanation for why this random stranger is yelling? maybe yelling at his wife and kids.
0 likesI for one thing wouldn't bother talking to someone about a stupid handicapped space at all, because in reality it doesn't matter very much.
@box he stomped on him? Lmao stfu he pushed him and the guy fell. And then he started backing up and the guy shot
0 likes@The Notorious Artorias Who are you to say who should and shouldn’t have guns though?
0 likes@Nicholas Hazel okay, I read your point the wrong way. . . 👌🏾
0 likes@Emobe would he have pushed a cop in that way? . . . if hes Smart, probably NOT... the young adults of today don't take kindly to being approached by non-authority figures, and I think he knew that... but... the presence of that GUN made him a little too froggy...just call the cops, they wound up being called anyway 🤷🏾♂️...(or just become a cop, if you have the desire to boss other adults around)
0 likesThe father was just protecting his wife the shooter did not have any reason to shoot the father
0 likes@Lololol Lolololol it’s just my opinion my guy.
0 likesThis guy is soooo over dramatic
0 likes@The Notorious Artorias who chooses?
0 likes@thatmaninblack i know this is a late reply, but i’m assuming you missed the part when it was mentioned that he had, on several occasions, threatened multiple people with his gun? because this wasn’t a one time thing. he had a history of abusing his fire arm. what ended up happening was an eventuality. a really fucking depressing one when you think about how it could’ve been avoided.
0 likes@CEDEREL CACEDENCE : If he did that illegally, how the authorities didn't take his carry license? It's happened in Florida, so the guy had to have a carry license. Wiki says he had 3 issues (2 of them gun-related). So the question is, if those really happened, why the police did let him go? Why the police kept the guy's carry license? Sounds like the police didn't care enough, and they did let the guy carry, even though he made multiple scary situations for others.
0 likesSounds like the police made a huge mistake.
@box don’t speak when you have a sponge-bob pfp.
0 likes@The Notorious Artorias Yeah that's why I'm 100% pro 2a because he's a criminal and criminals will always find a way to get a gun. So I need to defend myself against guys like him
0 likesYup, a good 50% of gun owners most likely think the same way. Sad.
0 likesHe shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
0 likesThat’s you, that’s how you’re able to relate.
0 likesUnfortunately, you are too correct. I am a pro gun and pro self defense guy, but I am against most (if not all) stand your ground laws and so on. I am for castle doctrine laws as long as you were not found criminally guilty, but I digress and will get to the point. I think that cases like this should be taken VERY seriously. In addition, I also think that people should be made aware of laws (through a class, etc….) when applying for a gun permit, and specifically bring up when it is and when it isn’t a proper time to use a gun against an assailant, and make them sign off on it. This would make these situations much more prosecutable, and it may even save lives. I am from Pennsylvania and I have a permit to carry, and even I am embarrassed of how it requires no actual training/qualifications and/or classes on laws when you get your permit. Because it all comes down to the most important thing….. not all “assailants” are putting your life in immediate, fatal danger… I don’t understand why the majority of the pro gun community see it as one extreme or the other and think that because someone was name calling, that it justifies taking someone’s life….. it’s rather pathetic TBH….
0 likes@steeveejee 100%!!!!!!!
0 likes@box all he did was push him.
0 likesYeah exactly why on gods green earth would you bribe a gun to the supermarket?
0 likes@Denis the stuffed animal the shooter is over dramatic a scratch and acts like he has a dislocated shoulder
0 likes@The Notorious Artorias out of curiosity, and as a swede who has never even seen an actual gun in real life, why should anyone carry them? won’t a weapon like that just make any confrontation escalate and make the situation worse?
0 likes@jordan5221 doesn't matter if you care about them or not. . . call the police. . . they wound up being called anyway 🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️
1 like@steeveejee at least you're objective
0 likes@DeMond SWAGGERBOY Nice of you to avoid the fact that he shouldn't be assaulting people in the first place. Who cares if the "youths of today don't like authority"? Last I heard that's not a right to assault people
0 likesSpot on!!
0 likes@box also spot on!!!
0 likes@box 1) Why are you lying? 2)Why are you so bad at it? We've seen the video, we all know that he didn't do anything like that?
0 likes🤣rip bro lol
0 likes@box when did they stamp their skull? His kids were in the store and in the car, where they most likely wouldn't be able to see everything directly. See people like you are what's wrong with the world, always exaggerating everything.
0 likes@thatmaninblack i’m not sure if he was arrested for threats of violence - either way, yeah, gun laws are way too lax.
0 likes@box yeah especially when a strange man is yelling at his wife with his kids in the car in a loud and threatening way
0 likes@CEDEREL CACEDENCE : Eh? The gun laws are way too strict. I think you wanted to say that because that's the truth.
1 likeAnyway, if the dude kills the other one with a knife, then what do you say about knife laws? What about the victims of the "knockout game" who die? Do you blame fists for that? Would you cut off people's fists because fists are too dangerous? Do you remember the news about the Canadian guy who killed 10 people with his van? I don't remember people speaking up against cars. Blaming objects is just utterly ignorant. Don't be like that...
Yet he waited 26 years...
1 likespeaking as someone with paranoia my thought process is dread that slowly decends into a dizzing panic its way i cant have a gun, i could hurt someone that wassint even attacking me when the paranoia hits... and in a situation where im assulted by someone like this guy was i could end up using the gun on them when i should not have.
1 like@box he only pushed him to ground, if your referencing another video, make that clear or you are being dishonest... i cant let that stand.
0 likesTHIS
0 likes@G Victor his account of the incident didn't match up with the video. How could the man feel threatened for his life still if the guy is already backing away.
0 likes@Frial S : True, but why the cops didn't revoke his carry license? That's the weird part.
0 likes@box hey nice sarcasm
0 likes@box he got one of them “beware of man with guns” signs on his fence I bet
0 likes@Andrew Crenshaw no force multiplier smh ✋😔
0 likes@thatmaninblack if you had watched this video and actually listened then you'd know it's because they couldn't connect him to those cases until after he shot that black dude. Once his trial started is when earlier victims said they recognised him. There's your answer. All I'm saying is, it's highly likely he was being as aggressive and threatening to that woman whose man got shot as he was to all his previous victims. So your comment makes no sense at all! If you're out there threatening and harassing people in the streets then of course people will step in! Spouse or not!
0 likes@Frial S I did watch this video when? like months or years ago? I don't remember every single word they said. You are expecting me to remember this video word-by-word when someone jumpstarted a discussion about it 7 months later? I take this as a joke. :)
0 likesIt's just weird how nothing happened and he didn't get caught before. In fact, I did read that they didn't get him only once because the victims ( ? ) drove away without telling anything to the police. (I think it's on Wikipedia.) Wiki says all of these incidents happened at the same place, so there is no way that the police couldn't get him or get info about him. Sounds like pretty bad police work to me.
Wiki says in the first case, the people didn't want him charged, in the 2nd case, the driver drove off and didn't even call the police.
The dude is a weirdo, gun or not, that's for sure.
@thatmaninblack "Drejka called the Clearwater septic tank company Kelly works for to complain, telling owner John Tyler that he didn't like the way Kelly had talked to him and that he was "lucky I didn't blow his head off."
0 likesTyler, a gun owner himself, told the Times he was shocked.
"I said, 'I'm sorry you feel that way, that you feel that it's justified to take someone's life over a parking space,'" he said. "That was the chilling part about it when I found out who it was with the (McGlockton) situation." go read the entire article, then come back and form a proper conclusion
@Frial S : Do I really have to spend more time on this? What would be the proper conclusion anyway? Saying that the police did an excellent job? Or the victims did great, as they didn't push charges, didn't report the threat or they even left the scene without a word? Why I'm not allowed to criticize the situation again? Why do I even have to talk about this long forgot case? Can we talk about Tony Timpa instead?
0 likes@thatmaninblack maybe try reading the article explaining all incidents because then you'd realise that what you are saying is not making any sense at all. Two victims literally recognised him because of his murder and the trial being televised. So again, read up on the incidents so you yourself can realise you're wrong, or stop making judgement calls that you present as facts based off no source other than Wikipedia (lmao). Either acknowledge the fact that you don't know anything about those incidents and are not willing to read up on it, or read up on it and rectify all that you've said. You can't just lie based off nothing and then refuse to face facts when confronted with them, very Trumpian.
0 likes@Frial S : Maybe try to comment to relevant things and don't expect people remember comments and videos 6-12-24 months ago.
0 likesWikipedia has the source on the bottom. That is what Wikipedia about. You don't even know how the Wiki works. Great...
Yeah, I don't know much about a long time forgotten incident, why would I? I have no idea what did we even talk about it back in the days. No, I'm not willing to read all that crap again. 332 comments.
"You can't just lie based off nothing and then refuse to face facts when confronted with them, very Trumpian." - Oh, now it's politics... Just wondering what is your politics, since you are extremely rude, prejudicial, and harassing others with long time forgotten stories. Calling a Ron Paul Libertarian guy "Trumpian" is pretty nonsense. Maybe cut back your antisocial, aggressive behavior. I don't want to talk about this story, and I'm not going to read back 332 comments. What you gonna do about it? You aim a gun at me, like Drejka? Some people, seriously....
@thatmaninblack so you forgot your replies in this thread and yet reply to me with the same nonsense, does that make sense to you? So you're comfortable making judgement calls without looking into facts? That's all I'm getting out of you. So you think Wikipedia is a legitimate source? Any reason why you're not allowed to use it in academic papers?
0 likes@Frial S : No, it doesn't make sense to me why are you bothering me with this case/video I forgot a long time ago. I'm saying that Drejka is an idiot. If you think he is not, it's your problem.
0 likesIt's you who judging me, you even got politics into this. I think Wikipedia has sources on the bottom of the pages. Maybe you should check those. The academic papers are usually at the bottom of the pages. Stop harassing me with stupid things, I'm not going to chew myself through his whole court case, just because you decided to pull me back into this nonsese. I'm saying Drejka is an idiot and he should get time in jail (probably he is behind bars already). If you don't think that he should be in jail, it's also ok. I'm not going to get triggered by your opinion. Bye.
@box If you’re racist just say that
0 likes@G Victor you absolutely do not get to shoot somebody because they parked in a handicap spot. your lack of sympathy for the victims is absolutely terrifying.. please do not own any guns. you do not have to be an angel to not get shot for stupid reasons, whether or not they were suffering drug addictions or working fast food jobs. your lack of respect for human life is disgusting
0 likes@Silent Life Protecting them from knowing they should not park in handicapped?
0 likes@Mastershake You're on the side of a woman who willfully broke the law, got an attitude when told so, and her husband that fights words with physical violence ...none of the 3 involved were exactly correct.
0 likesHowever, the woman started the whole thing. If she'd have just moved her car out of respect for the law, and not just acted entitled to violate it, this would never have happened.
It isn't even a question of who was right, nobody really was .
The shooter shot as if he was in fear for his life, we can't really know for certain what he was thinking.
The man that hit him was foolish
Showing off in front of his wife, fighting words with violence. Why didn't he just tell the guy ok, we're leaving anyway? No, he had to blindside him. Big man...not! I wouldn't have fired. Not with all of my experience.
I would have had the assailant arrested. SO....go ahead, call me names, its either my gender or my assumed race, isn't it?
@Emanuel Those are tiny countries...no comparison . And there's plenty of home invasions and rapes there.
0 likes@DeMond SWAGGERBOY Seems the gun was the equalizer. The big guy knocked a smaller guy down in a cowardly way, blindsided him. Didn't even try to acknowledge the issue first, had absolutely no respect at all.
0 likes@CoolingOD Of course he violently assaulted the guy, or he wouldn't have been on the ground!
0 likes@Clint.Beastwood And you don't assault people for words.
0 likes@Screematu22 The father was teaching his kids that its ok to break the law, parking in handicapped spots, and ok to assault anyone who dares to speak out about it.
0 likes@Mastershake Hahaha! If ANYTHING I have stated is incoherent to you, I am afraid I must reiterate your need for proper education and perhaps, some counseling. Good luck!
0 likeslol probably
0 likes@box No, but you and your friend Michael sure seem to support that logic.
0 likes@Sheik Bombalot that’s literally the same exact this this criminal did, illegally parked and shot a personal
0 likesHis life wasn’t in danger his pride was smh
976 likesReplies (28)
Yeah true , pride made him use the gun
24 likes@Wes Braz that's a bold statement
60 likesSpeculation.
0 likes@I need a break he put hands on him he has medical issues (back issues ie the retirement)I could've seen the case going the other way to be honest
4 likes@SithVicious so now we know you have no clue what pride is
2 likes@Dark and Edgy when you mind your busniess you usually stay out of problems like this🤡
12 likes@mike Mike not wrong but to attack someone cause they were complaining of not having a handicap parking seems also dumb like I said I could've seen this going either way.
1 like@mike Mike but regardless he shot someone who was fleeing with out a weapon so if he just drawn the weapon he'd been fine but regardless the court decided the case.
0 likes@Nathan Bosher im not defending his actions, but he didnt “start shit.” he was telling them to get out of the handicapped spot when they were wrongfully using it
3 likes@zbrayden definitely starting something, he’s not the parking spot police. If he told an employee and then the guy pushed him, I could see your point, but it’s not the case.
12 likes@Dark and Edgy How was he fleeing, he shoved him to the ground and stood over him. The man who was on the ground had his life in the hands of the one who pushed him.
3 likes@HyperS that split second when he pulls the gun out he takes two steps back thats considered fleeing he is no longer engaging the target. Do I believe the dude was a victim no I believe he was was some hot headed idiot but that delay when he sees the firearm counts as attack being over.
4 likes@Dark and Edgy I understand where you're coming from, I understand your side. We looked at the same evidence and came to opposite conclusions.
2 likesI pity the loss of McGlockton, and his family, I just can't justify him shoving an older man to the ground for having a verbal argument with his wife.
Why should Drejka wait for McGlockton to begin further assaulting him before he has the right to defend himself?
@Dark and Edgy McGlockton did disengage after seeing the gun, a level headed man would not have pulled the trigger. However, Drejka was overpowered and shoved to the ground. I genuinly believe he feared for his life, or at least, his personal safety and wellbeing.
2 likesThe interrogation officer asked if Drejka ordered McGlockton to back up before he fired. However, McGlockton didn't order Drejka to back up before he shoved him to the ground.
Do I think McGlockton deserved to die? Definitely not. But let's face it, he was the aggressor here.
@HyperS yes definitely agree on the aggressor part and to be honest I probaly would of scream back up back up before firing but I actually have military training I'd probaly would of waiting for him to leave my sight before getting up as well then called the police for assault.
0 likes@HyperS he shouldn't have to wait but that is the law if we had more fuck around and find out laws this shit wouldn't happen.
0 likes@Dark and Edgy Do you think he deserved a 20 year sentence?
0 likesI think the verdict is racially driven.
I am still forming my opinion and would like to learn every detail before making up my mind.
@HyperS tbh I only watched half the episode as I watch in bits and pieces so say 20 years ehhh maybe a bit extreme as to say it's racially motivated crime is stretching it he didn't make them park in that handy cap spot nor did he assault them first.
0 likes@Dark and Edgy I do feel like if you have someone berating your wife you’re going to protect them. Regardless of whatever the topic is. When Michael was pushed over the father didn’t make another aggressive move. Michael took it to an extreme because his feelings were hurt. I’ve been shoved before but I’m not a pussy who would claim I feared for my life and shot the person.
3 likesHit the nail on the head!
0 likesYes it was you fool don’t hurt people
0 likes@Kronyx no it’s not
0 likes@HyperS You have an entire video showing the detail. Man illegally parks next to car illegally parked and counters a shove to the ground with lethal force as a man was disengaging. We all watched it together quite literally.
2 likes@Sophos What I mean to say, is that it is a complex moral issue. It puts gun control into question, and it's a perfect encounter to assess the current state of the US. I don't think one can ever draw a black and white conclusion.
0 likes@HyperS Not without something like video evidence, no. He, in all reality, waited until his aggressor was walking away to fire a shot. No black/white conclusion; a documented conclusion. Defender can say he was scared and panicked but what the fuck kind of excuse is that to ending this other man's life? I'd give him a fair chance if that attack ensued but no, the guy thought that trigger pull out. We saw it in its entirety.
2 likes@Nathan Bosher he didn't start anything; the dude pushed him
0 likes@I need a break No they deserve punishment for physically assaulting someone
0 likes@Wes Braz your last name is underwear bahahahahahahahaha
0 likesCop: "Are you able to answer a 'yes' or 'no' question like a normal person?"
686 likesDrejka: "Negative."
Replies (18)
He's like a wannabe cop. I find it disgusting to hear.
38 likes@Lu Valour I mean he basically did their job so like
3 likesDrejka trying to be tacticool
15 likes"Uh, Roger, that's a Negative"
6 likesBut He was thrown out of military after 2 months tho, right?
I’m ex military i still use negative all the time. It’s hard to drop after 18 years of service
2 likes@JudwahWere you in for only 2 months like him, tho? 😄
4 likes@Alvan Negative ;)
7 likesWheres Stephen McDaniel when you need him
1 like@Judwah "Copy That."
2 likesAnd TYFYS.
:-D
@Alvan Perfect set up
1 likeThis was a politically motivated railroading. Nothing he said could have helped. The cops and prosecutors originally and correctly said it was self defense. This guy who couldn't walk without assistance was on the ground while a guy 1/2 his age and twice his size was over him.
0 likes@tarstarkusz Don't take the bar exam Bubba 😀. Even at the time, the guys who wrote the law, said this was not what it was for.
1 likeDrejka is a raging, bully that has pulled his gun multiple times on unarmed citizens for trivial reasons.
He was raging and pointing in an aggressive manner at a Woman and Small Kiddos.
@Alvan It was initially ruled a self defense shooting, which is what it was. What he allegedly did on some other day is irrelevant. He was not charged until the enemy of the people ginned up mobs against him all based on race.
0 likes@Ben McConnon The local officials(elected) who made that decision, made a mistake! They made a hastt decision, that doesn't mean it was right! Their decision also avoided a Toxicology Screen for Drejka, not incidentally.
0 likes.Anyway, That's why we have trials so that QUALIFIED people can make the decision.
You're so biased, that you don't get it. But the true facts all line up against you.
---
Published Aug. 23,
Jeff Brandes, a Republican state senator who had a central role in revising Florida's stand your ground law in 2017, said the statute should not apply in the recent high-profile Clearwater killing of Markeis McGlockto
@Ben McConnon You forgot some options: tarstarkusz is a bigot, or racist or Troll who doesn't care about the laws, or Drejka's history of pulling a gun or making threats and assaulting people. (worse assaults than what McGlockton did btw).
0 likesThe guy who wrote the law, says this was a bad shoot, that's proof enough for me.
@tarstarkusz What he did on anther day is not irrelevant if he has a pattern and practice of doing this exact same thing.
0 likesAnd if there were multiple witnesses, and a Police report noting an unsecured firearm at the time the stopped him.
He also Lied to the initial investigators; so again their decision wasn't based on all the facts. Learn from Drejka's mistakes and common sense.
Don't be a Drejka.
@Alvan No. Stop lying. They had the video tape from the beginning and that is why he wasn't initially charged.
0 likesStand your ground had absolutely nothing to do with this case. It was not a stand your ground defense. He could not retreat because he was pinned to the ground. The opposite of stand your ground is duty to retreat. You cannot have a duty to do something you cannot do. Duty to retreat ENDS when you can no longer retreat. If you retreat into a dead end and can no longer run because the path is blocked by a building or obstacle, you can now use deadly force assuming it is otherwise authorized.
That guy pushed drejka to the ground and then ran in for the finishing. He pulled the gun in self defense while pinned to the ground. That guy was going to cause him severe bodily injury.
It was a political lychmobing.
@tarstarkusz McGlocton was Backing Away and turned when shot. No amount of whining about "Politics" can change that.
0 likesI know that defense lawyer was just doing what he's paid to do, but damn did I want to slap him when he had the balls to say Drejka was the "true victim." Bro, your client just turned this family into a single parent household and the worst he suffered was a couple scrapes and a bruised ego. Marquis and his family are the real victims here, full stop.
282 likesReplies (33)
maybe he shouldn’t have assaulted someone over an argument he had no involvement in starting - play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
21 likes@azathoth 988 He shouldn’t of pushed him but shooting him was so overboard.
12 likesHe would have gotten much more than a couple scrapes if he wasn't carrying. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
8 likesI agree that he shouldn't have shot the guy, but there was no need to shove him to teh ground, and I can understand why ( in the moment) he felt the need to pull a gun.
4 likes@Uhuh.223 You're right, he was yelling at them for parking ILLEGALLY. There was no need to assault the guy first, especially when they were in the wrong. 🤦🏿♂️
9 likesI totally agree, I
0 likescan't believe that puppeteer, kiss ass of attorney, how can he sleeps at night? To have the audacity to stand up in court and defend someone that the rest of the world knows is guilty.
Well don’t put your hands on people. ThTs what he gets :)
1 like@Ninja Shogun yeah but unfortunately having your kids near you doesn’t shield you from being killed infront of them- there is not magical force that does that. don’t assault people in front of your kids and chances of you being killed or assaulted back infront of them decreases significantly
1 like@Erica Mercado girl wtf. he shouldn't die for trying to protect his wife and kids. even if he did shove the guy, that doesn't mean he needs to be shot for it...
5 likes@Aditi Joshi he wasn’t protecting his wife and kids. He was the one people needed to protect them selfs from.
0 likes@Erica Mercado how? the guy was screaming at his wife and kids so he just pushed him away so they wouldn't get hurt... dude i think you're just biased
5 likes@Aditi Joshi if you push someone for a verbal argument. You automatically lose
5 likes@Aditi Joshi this is America what do you expect. Come on don’t act surprised. I mean I know not to go around putting my hands on people, no matter what the verbal argument is. Law of probability ( in America atleast) and what everyone should already know is put your hands on a person first = the person will retaliate even if that means with a gunshot
0 likes@Viscus No he shouldn't have, that dude even has a history of starting fights just to pull his gun he's an actual menace. The dud pushed him because like I said his vulnerable wife and kids were being yelled at
0 likes@AntiSocial Pleb Ok so basically you wouldn't have done anything because you're passive even though they were screaming at your wife and kids. Also it doesn't matter if he knew he had a gun or not because he's still yelling at them smh
1 like@Uhuh.223 You do realise there are more options than just attacking him or doing nothing, right? There's a third option which is to discuss the issue rationally, which clearly he, and you, swept under the rug. Also, the reason why I pointed out that he didn't know he had a gun, is because in your previous comment it sounded as if you were trying to justify his actions because he had a gun on him- but at the time, he wasn't aware of that.
0 likes@AntiSocial Pleb Really doing everything in your power to defend this guilty man its crazy, and why would you think a man who parked illegally to yell at a woman and her 2 kids who weren't driving for parking illegally, is a man who wants to be reasoned with? In other situations maybe they could be reasoned with, but this dude has a whole past of starting altercations to pull his gun on people.
0 likes@Uhuh.223 Yes, a man who parked illegally can be reasoned with. Tf are you on about? Also, I'm not saying he should have shot the guy, but at the end of the day, he was the one who assaulted him first 🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️
0 likes@Uhuh.223 Should he have shot him? No. Should he have pushed him? No. I'm not trying to justify the killing, but the idea that the guy who shot him was completely at fault, and the guy who got shot was just an innocent victim is idiotic.
0 likes@AntiSocial Pleb Just replied and it got deleted but whatever ion even care anymore
0 likes@Uhuh.223 Ok then.
0 likes@Zwenk Wiel If I remember correctly 2 kids were in the car and 1 was taken out with the dad. Also if that's how you see it I don't care you're still wrong
0 likesso you think assaulting people on the street is common every day practice?
0 likesif a handicapped person came driving by and wanted to park, he/she would also be the victim here.
0 likesWell.. have you ever had your ego bruised? That shit hurts for real! We have to nip that in the bud!
0 likes@Zwenk Wiel dude, did you see that long ass pause before he shot him after he pulled the gun out? if nothing was said, there was no longer a threat.. if he shot him sooner I can see it possibly being an impulse reaction but he had the gun pointed at him waaaay too long to justify shooting him AFTER he has taken a few steps back.
0 likes@azathoth 988 this wasn’t a reasonable reaction though this guy was just itching to use his weapon he didn’t use the weapon defuse the situation he shot him as he was backing up just wanted to shoot that fucking gun
0 likesGod bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
1 like@Zwenk Wiel God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
1 like@Srb God bless! Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering! God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead! Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you! Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)✋😌
1 like@olivia grace earth was made by the Big Bang lmao
0 likes@Real Gondal yeah we all saw that but was a shot to the chest needed? This was the first time he pulled a gun on someone he has done it before, look at the reports. Stop bringing race into everything. This situation didn’t require a gun at that moment.
0 likes@Mandavi Roldan he's doing his job. Someone literally has to defend these people to the best of their ability, it's their right. And if they don't perform to the best of their ability, they take the risk of being sued for misconduct. Quit looking at these thing through the lens of an emotional child. Do you honestly think that we should just throw our arms up and say "guilty" just because its obvious he did it? Everyone has a right to a fair trial. Grow up
0 likesHe was sentenced to 20 years today. The judge made a comment about him parking illegally to confront the woman.
211 likesReplies (5)
@Joxman2k So you think him getting tackled was reasonable? He was a deadly accident waiting to happen, if you live in America, expect people to carry a weapon and use them to kill you if you provoke them. Fuck, this situation is just so sad. That dad obviously had issues if he sees it fit to tackle a guy like that, it's just sad that the one he tackled was carrying. If he hadn't been carrying a gun, the dad would have been convicted of assault.
4 likesk1j2f30 exactly. Shoved and fell over. Deadly force was absolutely not the right call.
7 likesThat judges comment is a cold comfort to the dead mans children.
0 likes@Ed
0 likesI tend to agree, Ed. Drejka was attacked by surprise from behind, shoved heftily from behind/ left side that he fell to the floor and then overreacted, yes, but the initial aggression came from the victim. I do not condone what Drejka did, but he didn't deserve 20 years imprisonment, that was far too excessive - far worse criminals get less for far worse crimes.
That was pretty fun, since he was so upset at someone else parking where they aren't supposed to, to then do it himself.
1 like1:46 its back in sling lol
0 likesThis was so hard to watch.... the dad was literally backing up and even putting his hands up while moving backwards once he saw the gun, yet this POS still shot him. There was no threat after the push happened.... this guy deserves to be tortured in prison.
2 likesThis man was looking for someone to shoot, when the detective asked him did he ever think about the fact that the person in the car might become confrontational and he said yes but I'm prepared for that so clearly he was waiting for the opportunity to shoot someone this man was the aggressor and he committed murder this was the 5th time he brandished his weapon on someone and he has absolutely no remorse
76 likesReplies (2)
TheHumanity! Michael is that you?
7 likesDiana Benson,
2 likesExactly. That "yes, but I'm prepared" gave him away. He was looking for an excuse to shoot someone. This was his 5th (known) time that he pulled his weapon on a person.
He came there every day to mark 'his' sad little territory and to look for an opportunity and finally, he saw this easy target to play Cops and Robbers 'with'.
1. Don’t go around trying to police people even when they’re clearly in the wrong.
95 likes2. Don’t put your hands on people because you never know how unhinged they might be and what they may be carrying.
Replies (14)
How about just don’t put your hands on people? That guy is dead because his only recourse in the event of an argument was to violence. So when his violence was trumped by that of another I am supposed to feel pity?Nope. I only hope more incipient aggression is met with responsive brutality. Maybe if this becomes a trend people will stop attacking other people for nothing more than the exchange of words.
13 likes@Maximos Wolfe yeah man exactly. they are saying its bad to use harsh words and to attack someone is a acceptable but it is not acceptable to defend yourself from violence.
4 likes@Maximos Wolfe So you're saying the answer to violence is more violence? If your friends jumped off a bridge, would you too? How is this common sense in any way. If a white man died instead of a black man, I'm sure you would've said differently.
10 likes@Maximos Wolfe what are you smoking
2 likes@Violet Alice Evans what are you smoking
2 likesDid not look unhinged to me. It seemed like a well-calculated move - took his time to aim, probably had been waiting for this moment his whole pathetic life.
12 likes@Maximos Wolfe you start arguing in public with my wife/GF and my kids nearby, you're catching hands, no question. If you're lucky, only hands.
9 likes@Maximos Wolfe actually he’s dead because an unhinged and irresponsible gun owner was looking for an excuse to kill.
9 likes3. Don't shoot people if your life isn't actually in danger.
4 likesHello? How about don't shoot people unless your life is under threat?
6 likes@Ajdin Cerenic Yup, that too
0 likesWow ...best comment
0 likes@Maximos Wolfe how about dont get into the face of someone's wife and kids unless you want to get into a fight? You trying to say that you're going to try to talk and be sensible to a grown ass man shouting at your wife and kids about how you parked?
2 likesWow, check out all the victim blaming in the thread. How about:
2 likes1. Mind your business.
2. Stop harassing black people and mind your business.
3. Don't look for an excuse to kill someone and mind your damn business.
this whole thing is disgusting but seeing him take his arm out of the "sling" to use it IS SO FUNNY
1444 likesReplies (8)
Fellow Frank respecter. Mwah mwah
4 likesWhat time stamp
2 likes@Happy CG 51:26
4 likes@Happy CG 12:02
1 like@jayson phillips that's just not true. I love how you make the government and stuff effective in your theories. The planet is literally dying and they do nothing. Their corrupt and useless, with incompetent people at the top
4 likesWait what minute
0 likesPlease be respectful that’s not funny to pick on him, his other hand was hurting!
1 like@Aaron what did he say?
1 likeI couldn't even watch the whole thing... Wow wow wow..... Humans...??
0 likesThat's a pretty strong defense: "The video of my client murdering the victim as he backed away isn't in high definition."
619 likesReplies (20)
Based 1080p
3 likesWhat about the wavy lines?
19 likesYeah I agree! I hear lawyers give bad defenses sometimes if they know the suspect is guilty. Maybe this is that kinda situation?
19 likesGotta make do with what you got.
12 likesI liked the part where he said Drejka didn't seem happy when the detectives told him the guy died.
15 likesWell no shit, now he's looking at even more serious charges.
I started to laugh when he was explaining artifacts. Like no bro a person walking backwards is not an artifact of SD video. Hahahaahahha
8 likes@EJ this guy isn't guilty
1 likeI've got something to say...
2 likes@Patrick Carpenter When a lawyer starts arguing with video evidence, you know they don't have a strong defense, lol.
9 likesBut he’s right lol
0 likes@Clown innocent people don't lie about facts or make false statements to police, guilty people do.
5 likes@Erik Neumann he was under pressure, I'm sure he gave his recollection of events as he remembered them
0 likes@Clown we can't assume his motivations, we can only assess his statements against the video evidence. He may have genuinely felt endangered, but his perception was obviously wrong, so it would be a mitigating factor, not an absolution of guilt. Amber Guyger, the cop who murdered a guy in his own apartment, thought he was an intruder in her apartment. Just because she felt in danger doesn't mean she wasn't negligent in her actions.
9 likes"The wavy lines" hahahha i loved that shit
5 likesWelp, it's how r Kelly got away with it.
2 likes@Verhoeven1980 the lady doth protest too much
1 likeThat sounded really weak, didn't? Like he was trying to imply that McGlockton wasn't really in the process of retreating when he pulled the gun, even when it's clear as day he was.
1 likeYes, extremely weak defense. Why no just say that the defendant percieved a threat just having been knocked down and didn´t really see him reatreating. In fact after retreating you can see the victim kinda moving a little forwards. I don´t see how it can be that hard to claim reasonable doubt that he didn´t know if he was safe. Might not have saved him from a guilty verdict but video artifacts? Really bro? Maybe I should become a lawyer. Doesn´t seem that hard to top this performance.
2 likesHe heard about compression artifacts yesterday.
1 likeavenderiel the lawyer probably already knew he was done for & gave a bad defense. he pretty much already screwed himself over in the interview. u can’t save a sinking ship, but u still have to do ur job. maybe u should be a lawyer? not if u don’t realize these situations.
1 likeThe detective doing the questioning was so incredibly professional. Think about all the questions he asked, the order in which he asked them, and how much information he obtained.
58 likesReplies (2)
Ya. He nailed this. Great job.
0 likesHe couldn't have done it better, he didn't put words in Drejka's mouth and everytime asked is this correct? To confirm his actions.
0 likesIf anyone wants to know, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison on October 10th, 2019.
113 likesReplies (10)
Didn't it say he got out on $100,000 bond? Or was that something else
0 likesYay!!
6 likesNot enough time
4 likes@Tjakko Bosma haha sweet!!!
1 likeand is currently getting spit-roasted on the daily, lol
3 likesgood. i’m tired of these power-crazed gun toters thinking they’re vigilantes.
2 likes@Tjakko Bosma good
0 likesLove it
0 likesShame. Only a dangerously violent person would react the way he did to an argument. He is the one who instigated the violence.
0 likesMike started an argument. That is no reason for starting a physical aggression. Furthermore, he could have been killed had he fell wrong on the concrete floor.
People die all the time from falling wrong. His reaction was 100% justified to a life threatening aggression.
It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself but at least he got rid of that animal. (whoever resorts to violence in an argument is an animal).
I'm glad he got time, but not enough...
0 likesSociopath should not be able to own a gun but hey it’s America.
2 likes“I’m just your normal average everyday person with average problems”
3844 likesHis problems: Murder charge
Replies (27)
Anime protag be like
40 likes@Karama I love this reply
5 likes@Jeff -66 he gone claim self defense again 🤣
16 likesHe said he had money problems. He could’ve used that assault caught on tape to get a big pay day. Instead got 20 years.
9 likesOur problem: He thought that was legal and reasonable.
6 likesI have 4 charges of vehicular manslaughter, and 1 case of murder.
17 likesI’m just a normal average person with average problems
Guessing he’s referring to life with exception of this recent event..
0 likeswhat’s with all the recent comments???
0 likes@kam the almighty algo guides us where it guides us 🙏
2 likes@seasoda. i like your profile picture
0 likes@Jeff -66 I wont care if hes gone forever this kind of people carry weapons and try to make people angry so they can use them
0 likesLesson learn respect every person around you. if they looking for trouble, back up take q deep breath, and live him at the end is not worth it.
2 likesAnd then Americans get offended when the rest of the world perceives them like this...
0 likes@kam lmao
1 likeWhy no one talks about the fact that the initial physical aggression was a massive overuse of force. He pushed him from the back on a concrete floor for a verbal altercation. People have fucking died for falling wrong. It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself. At least he helped society by terminating an animal.
0 likesIn prison killing is very average and you can be average person with average problem :D
0 likesHe spend too much time reading military and.survival mags.
0 likes@southside yeah seriously. Dude assaults him out of nowhere. I agree that he didn’t deserve to get shot and killed but damn people. Don’t be shovin people over parking spots. How about “hey buddy what the hell ya doin”
0 likes@Gregor Heisenhorn I don't get it what is the difference between manslaughter and murder?
0 likes@Mr abd Manslaughter is the simple act of killing while murder is the act of making a plan of killing someone and executing this plan.
2 likesHe shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.
1 like@SquishyOfCinder sadly, even though he aimed at the victim's chest, who was backing away from this guy
0 likes@Michael Zomsuv you see after he pushed him that guy pointed out his gun the person who pushed backed up and was going to the store if that guy didn't shoot him he could have pressed charges now do you understand?
0 likes@Gregor Heisenhorn ok thank you :)
0 likes@Michael Zomsuv thanks I didn't know that :)
0 likes@Karama 💀💀💀
0 likesJust a regular everyday normal guy 😂 can't stop thinking about this song when I heard him say this lmao
0 likesSounds like a wannabe police officer/militant who never actually became one
9536 likesReplies (103)
That would be a nightmare of a police officer
451 likesLidia De la Rosa I agree but it just makes me laugh when he says negative
268 likesSeems like he trained with Jeremy Dewitte.. or maybe they're related.
76 likestotaly
5 likesThe wannabe military/cop thing is pretty common among hard core gun nuts. That's probably why they have such a strong need to have so many guns, to make themselves feel like military.
325 likes“nEgaTiVe”
144 likesExactly
3 likesThis guy is the kind of police officer that if he became one, he'd be the face of the next unjustified killing.
86 likesI think you've hit the nail on the head
9 likesEven had two German Shepherds
12 likes@Jack Burton this guy was well known for acosting people verbally at that store - it wasn't his first time.
22 likesHe's the guy in police training in the Simpsons screaming FORGET ABOUT THE BADGE, WHEN DO WE GET THE FREAKIN GUNS?!?
34 likesMay be a coincidence, but the shade of green of his top is similar to the Sheriff's. Perhaps he did see himself as an honorary police officer?
19 likesOpinionated Kraken Troll I didn’t even notice it, he’s acting so normal lol 😆
1 likeNew sheriff in town!
5 likes@darrenmuse absolutely!
4 likesThank God, but as we’ve seen far too often, this is the rule for most police personalities, not the exception. I think he’s overdoing it because he’s trying to be as cop-like as possible
9 likesSpot on.
3 likesLidia De la Rosa unfortunately most are just like him
2 likesWow thank you for all the likes and it’s really interesting to see everybody’s comments and opionions
3 likesThat’s people with superiority complexes. It’s pitiful.
13 likesHero complex. This guy was a ticking time bomb that doesn't use rational thinking.
18 likesAll you people that can’t mind your own business I’m begging you to insert yourself into my business. The police can take care of the no parking and handicapped parking . Stay the hell out of peoples business , be it gay , religion,race or anything that does not concern you . If you see someone getting hurt or treated badly of course the rules change .
16 likes@Greg Black "If you see someone getting hurt or treated badly of course the rules change." THIS!!
6 likesWell he's never been in a fight before so there goes the combative portion of training...
2 likesI A. S. 😂😂
0 likesBruh I was thinking the same thing. I wanna know what makes people talk like that. I’m guilty of it sometimes when talking to a professional of any kind but I don’t pretend to know more than them but I know people that think they do
4 likesGood thing to. He would have killed another george floyd. Ironic the guy he killed is black.
2 likes@Liza Tanzawa yes
0 likesWho gave him the carry permit,
1 likeyou mean cops? then security are people who failed at both but have a huge ego or god complex.
1 likeI totally agree with you.
6 likesMy favorite perplexing quality about these people is they're mostly in horrible physical shape.
@Linda Niemkiewicz Remember that Trump was the one who posted a full ad in the NYTimes saying the Central Park 5 should be executed and stood by that statement even after DNA evidence freed them.
1 likeWhat's a militant?
0 likesHe was waiting for his moment...and to him whose a young blk man....no one
3 likes@Shannon oFARRELL can you English better?
1 like@Shannon oFARRELL I'm from the states. Your wording was just awful it made me lol reading it. No hard feelings aye. I was being cheeky is all.
1 like@Logan , imagine half of your friends talk a certain way, and your teachers talk a certain way, and maybe even one of your parents too. Eventually, without your consent, you will likely find yourself talking in a similar way. For example, if you moved to a different part of the country, where the "normal" accent is different.
2 likesNow consider firearms enthusiasts. You are correct, that this group of people are not all police/military, though a good portion of them are, including many (in my experience, most) of the instructors.
So even if you hate this way of talking, it's not necessarily that the speakers actively chose to use it, I'd argue that it's often subconcious.
zzz well that was rather thought provoking
2 likes@Logan comment policing is thought provoking
0 likesShanie Cakes ?
0 likesin other words just average cop material
0 likesIf he was a cop this would have been excused
1 like@Eric Johnson 👏👏👏
0 likes21 FOOT RULE
0 likes@Anthony Delara 21 yrs for murder
1 likeHe just never reached that educational level of receiving enough Cs on his report card to reach cop status as a vocation.
3 likesWell I'm damn glad he didn't but the fathers life being lost to him... disgusting g... We already have too many violent dolts working as police.
1 like@Bo Riddley Because a man trying to stand up for his family when they are accosted by some lunatic is pretty normal contrary to someone who shots an unarmed man over a parking space.
1 like@Greg Black Good advice. By minding one's own business this will eliminate a lot of conflict and needless killing.
1 likeThere are many like him that did made it.very trigger happy
2 likesOnly difference is like 8 months of training ..
0 likes@Mikayla H it’s almost like he didn’t kill a person
1 like@Ayessa V. Cruz are you saying he’s convincing or innocent, making sure I’m not misreading it.
0 likes@L lovly wouldn’t be the first like him
3 likesFor real!!
0 likesCowardly actions
0 likes@Logan Rodger i copy.
0 likesROTC kid all grown up lmaoo
1 likemost cops act exactly lik ehim
0 likesRoger that! Affirmative.
1 like10-4, KMG365 Rampart.
Maybe for good reason, too
1 like@Will G this one eas already unjustified, and made no sense
0 likesIt's so cringe I had to take breaks from his interview.
0 likes@Michael Kennedy It'll be his last for the next 20 years. If he survives that long inside. An inmate has had a pop at him already.
0 likesWell said.
0 likesOn point !
0 likes@L lovly I work security and I've met way too many like that.
0 likesAnother proud boy
3 likesThank god for that
0 likes@Jack Burton And they are so obviously insecure..
2 likes@Jack Burton A wise man once told me, "Never go full sheepdog"
0 likes@Humberto Cobian same I felt like I was having stroke trying to read that sentence 😂
1 like@Shannon oFARRELL I had a hard time trying to understand what you just wrote..
0 likes@Shant Faith we got people out here talking cursive. Uh wurds hard.
0 likesHe never should of violently pushed him like that. That was very uncalled for. It’s still no excuse to fire a gun at the man
0 likes@Fishbone twunteh when fut rull
0 likes@Eric Johnson Well yeah, these are literally the types of people most likely to want to be cops.
0 likesHe was overqualified.
0 likesThe male Karen
0 likesa good one
0 likesCarry permits are not something to be given by the king they are a right.
0 likes@L lovly the sad thing is, a guy like this could easily become an officer, and there are MANY men just like this
1 likeIf you assault a cop like that and then back off I doubt you won't be shot at
0 likes@Jack Burton ever shot a gun at the ranges? That shit is fun
0 likes@Humberto Cobian a militant is someone in a war, like the word belligerent. It’s just a more complicated way to say soldier.
0 likesSounds like a trump maga supporter/proudboys
0 likesClearly never had the discipline
0 likesSounds like your average proud boy
0 likes@darrenmuse My thoughts exactly.
0 likesI think the term is "Gravy Seal" lol
2 likesWe should all thank whatever force is protecting us that he never did.
0 likes@kimberly s handicap people that need to go to that store
0 likesExactly what I thought
0 likesAnd we see now why he’s never become one.
0 likes@Will GGood. He would have probably gotten away with it if he were a cop
0 likes@Jack Burton Hurr durr guns bad
0 likes@Jack Burton Next you'll tell me we need to ban assault guns.
0 likes@Sir Dankleberry Nope, but if you are such a horrible shot that you need 20+ rounds to hit a target, you probably shouldn't be handling firearms to begin with
0 likes@Jack Burton By that logic why do you need 7 rounds in a M1911A1?
0 likes@Sir Dankleberry If you suck at aiming, no amount of rounds is going to help
0 likes@Sir Dankleberry You really only need a bootknife. This one time, I had a Tech 9, and I thought I was all badass, so shot it over my head and a bunch of rocks fell on me, and I dropped my gun. When I came to, this crazy guy with a sword came it at me and it wasn't a gun that saved me that day, it was just a simple bootknife. That being said, it's all in the reflexes.
0 likes@Jack Burton Where the fuck were you to have rocks fall on you and to have a guy fight you with sword, is this Skyrim?
0 likesI don’t care if you are 100% innocent with literally nothing to hide….ask for a lawyer.
579 likesReplies (14)
It's better for innocent to have a lawyer
17 likesAnd this man wasn't innocent
58 likes@David Middleton definitely not
15 likes100% wont get a peep outta me without a lawyer. Even if i had 10 witnesses and video evidence proving my innocence. Lawyer
30 likes@David Middleton Of course he was and the video proves it.
1 like@Andre fruth man ..what’s it like to be you?
14 likes@Andre fruth you must be slow
8 likes@Joey Rogan I want you to read what you just wrote very slowly.
12 likes@Robert Larsen same here, I’ve seen too many innocent people sent to prison. There is often a misunderstanding of what lawyers are for.
2 likesLawyers are there to make sure an innocent person doesn’t get convicted! Innocent people shouldn’t talk to police without an attorney present.
I was the main suspect in my brother in law's murder about 15 years ago. I was 18 and dumb and I sung like a bird to the cops. I was innocent and the killer was caught a few weeks later. I didn't once consider that I should call an attorney.
3 likes@Sabrason how was he innocent everything points to deez nutz
1 likeEven with a lawyer the answer should always be no comment
1 like110%. Don’t. Talk. To. The. Cops. They are not your friends.
3 likes@Joey Rogan agreed. But the #1 rule is to have a lawyer present. Never ever talk to the cops.
2 likesDude the cops are literally feeding him a proper defense and he's just digging himself deeper and deeper 😂😂
347 likesReplies (6)
Ah yes, police work
12 likesCops routinely propose suggestions because it raises suspicions if they just agree with all their suggestions, and they usually won't remember the suggestion if it wasn't true, and will change it if a conflicting suggestion is given.
16 likesPsychos love to talk.
1 like@Umatsu Obossa damn that's smart
0 likesVery common tactic. Make the suspect commit to lies then keep note of them. Chances are they will say something in the future to the contrary. Then you have a very strong reason in court to be suspicious that he is lying under oath. It's a very smart strategy
0 likesHe's a cops kid. They tried to let him get off with self defense but it created public outrage so they charged him
1 likeMega fake sling nonsense. Couldn't even do a handshake. An hour later he's rolling around on the floor in full reenactment.
0 likesHe acts like that one school security guard that didn’t get accepted to be a actual police officer
498 likesReplies (9)
an actual*
1 likeMad Dog Tannen what
0 likes@Mango Water an actual*
2 likes@Mad Dog Tannen an actuelle*
1 likeWhere I grew up, the school SRO's were actual sheriff's deputies assigned to a school. Lol.
0 likesTaylor Loudenback ya I think my current school has official city police officers for our security guards, but my school before the current one had just plain people with no license wearing a shirt that said security
0 likesoh yeah. observe and report with seth rogan
1 likeSpot on!
0 likesClassic, spot on!! 👮♂️👮♀️
0 likesDude really took someone’s life over a parking spot, that he wasn’t allowed to use.
282 likesReplies (46)
Drejka shot him once to stop further violence from Marquise who was high on MDMA and had a hx of drug abuse and assaulting a police officer. Funny that fact is NEVER mentioned. It was a very measured and controlled response given the high-pressure/adrenaline-fueled situation. Marquise just happened to bleed out b/c Drejka was a good shot but Marquise initiated the violence over a parking spot and got taught the ultimate lesson to keep your hands to yourself. Only reason Drejka was convicted was b/c he willingly cooperated with police instead of lawyering up and didn't immediately and repeatedly claim he feared for his life.
13 likes@Sabrason Getting shoved is no reason to shoot and kill someone, how the hell can you even think that
95 likes@HisokaMorrow he shoved him as a warning to back off, there are ppl who would have punched him, but what man argues with a woman he doesn’t knows or who wasn’t bothering him. He could have reported that shit to the store or the cops, but he was being a George Zimmerman. If he wanted to police ppl, he should have joined the academy, but his ass wouldn’t have been able to hang because he’s sorry and he would have shot many. I’m a woman and even I had fights in school.
19 likes@Sabrason Marquise was defending his girlfriend from Drejka, at least it could be argued better than Drejka was protecting himself from Marquise considering he was stepping away.
9 likesI am pro 2nd amendment, but I completely understand how some people would be against it because of people like Drejka. The guy can't fight, but is willing to put himself in controversial situation only because of the gun he carries in concealment. He is a coward.
20 likes@Cori K Not really fair to compare this case to Zimmerman. In that instance, Zimmernman's attacker was repeatedly striking and attacking him, whereas in this instance Drejka fired well after Marquise had backed off, stopped attacking and was no longer a threat.
2 likes@Cale David Zimmerman was told by police and back off, he wasn’t a cop like Michael wasn’t, he could have watched Trayvon from a distance as so could Michael, he could have taken down license plate number.
6 likes@Sabrason glad Michael got taught the ultimate lesson too :)
2 likes@Cori K That's true, and I can appreciate that Zimmerman's case is very controversial, but consider the fact that Martin attacked Zimmerman and inflicted a head injury (there are photographs you can find here: https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/media/images/60317000/jpg/_60317077_zimmermancomp.jpg). I'm not saying that Zimmerman's situation was ideal - a young man lost his life - but calling Drejka another Zimmerman isn't really fair considering Zimmerman killed in legitimate self-defense and Drejka didn't.
2 likesI think it's important to be careful about tarring everyone with the same brush when there's nuance to these cases, because it weakens accusations of actual misconduct and discredits people who are genuine.
@Cale David I don’t feel you instigating a situation being that you are the one with a gun is self defense. Trayvon did not start with Zimmerman, Zimmerman approached him. It seems like us blacks can’t mind our business enough without someone bothering us. If a crime is happening, nonpolice officers need to call the police. If I’m stealing out the store you are shopping in, you have no right to attack me because it’s non of your business, contact the proper channels.
4 likes@Cale David And I stand by what I said, like it or don’t 👌🏿
1 like@HisokaMorrow Drejka shot to stop, not kill...if he wanted to kill him he would've emptied the clip in Marquise. He shot ONE time = very controlled and measured response given the situation. Unfortunately for Marquise, Drejka was an experience gun owner and a very good shot. A verbal confrontation is NO reason to lay hands on somebody..... EVER! Hopefully some of you #$%^#$& learned that lesson or you may find yourselves taking the dirt nap with Marquise because of a gun owner who you cross. KEEP YOUR HANDS TO YOURSELF AND DON'T START FIGHTS WITH PEOPLE YOU DON'T KNOW!
0 likes@Cori K Shoving = assault = illegal.
1 like@HisokaMorrow Of course it is, you've never taken a self-defense course, have you. You don't have to wait to be seriously injured before you defend yourself when there is no other option. The point of self-defense is to AVOID serious injury, not PREVENT additional serious injury.
0 likes@Sabrason you obviously didn’t watch or comprehend because he said he couldn’t fight nor has he ever. If you are carrying a gun, you don’t go out inciting shit, that’s exactly why his ass is in jail. Hopefully he doesn’t make it to see the light of day.
11 likes@Cori K Zimmerman backed off, he was assaulted as he was coming back to his car. He didn't see Trayvon once during the call with the cops
0 likes@Piero Fasulli that is a lie, and that’s not how the story goes
6 likes@Cori K proof?
0 likes@Piero Fasulli when he was on the phone he was told not to bother him, 4 times, he engaged, someone else called the cops because of the fighting,
5 likes@Piero Fasulli All the more reason Zimmerman should be in jail because he having a gun instigated a situation instead of avoiding it and got his ass beat and couldn’t take it like a man. Him getting off was some strings being pulled by his father, just like with Casey Anthony.
7 likes@Cori K cops told him to not bother him and he came back towards his car
0 likes@Piero Fasulli you on the internet, seems you know so much, look that shit up, how you posting and don’t know the whole story. He was told not to engage, 4 times. He even said he was walking around and it was raining, so he looked suspicious. He should be in jail. That’s what’s wrong with Karens and Kens, always think they know and own everything. If a crime isn’t happening, mind your business.
2 likes@Cori K he never talked or engaged with Trayvon before Trayvon assaulted him, and he only took out his gun when Trayvon try to steal it from him. night and day compared to Drejka case who actually shot for no reason
0 likes@Piero Fasulli no he did not, he was walking, that how the ppl in the apartments heard because he was walking in the direction of home.
2 likes@Piero Fasulli that’s Zimmerman alleged story which is bullshit, he instigated the whole shit, point blank period, Trayvon didn’t sneak him, he walked up to him.
4 likes@Piero Fasulli plus if you look at the photos from where his body is, there is no where for you to park unless you drive up on the lawn along the walk path, so what, did he drive up on it and follow him?
1 like@Piero Fasulli it’s easy to believe what others tell you to believe when a system tells you that blacks are bad and constantly paints the narrative for you, if only they broadcast the same amount of shit that other groups do equally. Imagine how many cases like Zimmerman or Casey Anthony that subtracts from the true numbers. This world is fucking sick.
1 like@Sabrason This is a really soft skull comment.
1 like@Piero Fasulli George Zimmerman was following a minor home. If anything, Trayvon had the best defense in this case because he was being followed by some strange man. From my understanding, Trayvon even called someone because he felt as if he was being followed.
4 likes@Paracetamol Girl You have no defense for their argument. Admit you're wrong.
3 likes@Sabrason this guy didnt see the evidence
2 likes@Sabrason then why didn’t he shoot into the air? And wtf are you talking about stopping him that black man was backing away
1 like@Deep Space All the information about the case is public. That never happened, Zimmerman never saw Trayvon once he got out of his car
0 likes@Piero Fasulli Didn't Trayvon hide from him?
0 likes@Cori K >It seems like us blacks can’t mind our business enough without someone bothering us.
1 likeMartin was casing houses to rob. I'd hardly call that minding his own business. And he attacked Zimmerman. That's been proven.
I appreciate that you feel there's a lot of prejudice and discrimination, and there absolutely is in some cases like the one in this video. But idolizing thugs like Martin and acting as if Zimmerman was in the wrong purely out of a sense of tribalism only makes you look bad.
>If I’m stealing out the store you are shopping in, you have no right to attack me
You have no right to be stealing in the first place. What kind of example is that? Or is stealing from stores normal behaviour for you?
@Cori K Drejka did nothing illegal. McGlockton was high on MDMA, had a hx of drug abuse and assaulting a police officer and committed the first crime by assaulting Drejka....that's why many legal experts agreed that it was a justified shooting.
0 likes@Sabrason 🤣
3 likes@Sabrason Michael should of kept his mouth to himself and not started a argument over a handicapped spot he can’t even use. He should of told the store manager and that would be the end of his involvement in the matter. Then the victim would of never been killed bc there would be no need to push Michael if he would of minded his own business.
0 likes@Sabrason please stop...everything you said was invalid this man was found guilty and sentenced
0 likesNo he was defending himself against a violent man
0 likes@HisokaMorrow It kind of is...
0 likes@Cori K Nobody is legally obligated to "take it like a man." You are, however, legally obligated to NOT assault anyone
0 likes@Borfis Jort or he could of minded his business and not say anything to the wife to begin with verbally attacking somone and circling their car ....while their kids are with them over a simple parking spot
0 likes@Borfis Jort the whole over all point is he should of minded his business they parked in the handy cap spot just to run into the gas station ...they would of been out the spot in a couple more minutes bottom line it was not in his place to even say anything to that family that's why he is convicted now
0 likes@Borfis Jort well legally, if I think someone approaching me is about to bring harm to me, I can legally assault you, you weren’t there no I, you approach someone aggressively and see what happens to you. I’m done on the matter and I said what I said.
0 likes@Maria Santos well said
1 likeJust a thought...Imagine this was a cop/security guard on the ground... and the outcome of the case...
0 likesEven while being interviewed in prison clothes this wannabe cop couldnt grasp the fact that maybe aggressively challenging someone doing something as harmless as parking in a handicapped spot without a badge, then pulling a gun on and shooting the husband when he arrives to defend his family from you, was the wrong way to go about the situation. This idiot literally said he wouldnt change a thing about what he did that day. I hope he rots away in prison.
56 likesReplies (6)
Well said. How anyone can think this man is in the right is beyond me.
8 likesParking is a disabled bay is not a harmless act, that does not excuse murder but let's be clear, the victim and his wife behave selfishly and violently
0 likesHe did not deserve to die but he and his wife were not blameless
@Jeffrey Bungle how is parking in a disabled bay a harmful act? It's there to make it a little easier for disabled people to get to their cars... That's literally it
1 like@YSAmmo if able bodied people use disabled bays it means that when the car park is full the disabled cannot shop
0 likesThat is harmful, it does not excuse this man's behaviour but this tragedy would have been avoided if the driver had not behaved selfishly
@Jeffrey Bungle uh no, disabled people CAN shop. They just use a different car parking spot and walk a little further. That's literally the only way they're impacted. Don't try to excuse his behaviour.
0 likes@YSAmmo at no point did I excuse his behaviour. He used deadly force to a criminal degree and was rightly imprisoned
0 likesHowever if you behave selfishly you will provoke anger, if you respond to that anger with violence you will provoke more violence.
The selfishness of the driver and the violence used by the victim provoked the violence of the killer. None were blameless
Really makes sense to allow civilians to stroll around with guns "most of their adult life" doesn't it? I wonder how the rest of the world gets by without guns?
1 likeUgh not another Michael.
0 likesI love hearing “I’m a very careful person” from someone who committed a murder in the cold light of day over a parking spot at a gas station.
211 likesReplies (12)
On the other hand he was physically assaulted by someone who was breaking the law.
6 likeswith cctv
1 like@Ding Dong parking in handicapped space + a push does not warrant murder
16 likes@Ding Dong the law said that guy is guilty. so what is your point? everyone breaks laws everyday. as long as you dont harm anyone its not a big deal. parking in a handicap spot is no big deal. unless you make it one. this Drejka guy decided to make it his problem. and he got what he wanted.
3 likes@RNDA Does not warrant but might GET you murdered. So why push instead of asking politely what the problem was? All he needed to do was to apologize (or even remain quiet) and leave the scene. When he pushed him to the ground, game changed. You do realize that if you slam your head to the asphalt after a push like that, it can be deadly?
1 like@BLUT WURST Parking at a handicap spot is annoying and disrespectful for the community rules. Commenting on it is understandable and may lead to a verbal confrontation if/when the parking party is not too sophisticated. The whole situation changed the second he put his hands on the guy. That was totally unnecessary and escalated the situation. All he needed to do was to sit in his car and drive away ignoring the complainer. They would happily live their lives today.
0 likes@Ding Dong murder is quite annoying and disrespectful as well.
2 likes@Joelberg11 True and goes a long way in proving that it's a very bad idea to go assaulting armed deranged people lol.
1 like@Ding Dong Pushing someone over does not mean you shoot them. That's an insane jump
0 likes@Decrepit Elmo Well as you saw, it did. I'd say it's an insane jump to start pushing arguing strangers to the ground. You never know if they're sane or not.
0 likes@Ding Dong I never said pushing someone was okay, just that it doesn't mean you automatically go straight to murder
0 likes@Decrepit Elmo And that was never my argument. What I said was had he not pushed him, he would most likely be now alive.
0 likesAll you gotta do is make a conversation about the other person’s wellbeing. “Ma’am, I’m sorry to bother you but the police drive around this store a lot and I don’t want you to get a ticket for being in the handicap spot on accident. Just lookin out for you!”
282 likesReplies (20)
not only this prevents confrontation, it also has higher chance that the person would do what u wanted. interesting 😯
73 likes@Ong Phui Shan yeah, it's a concept called reciprocity!
13 likesYup being able to communicate is key is any situation
11 likesYahhh and the driver is in the car he could've asked nicely for her to move to another spot.
3 likesOr he could've just minded his business... But he would never do that because he already admitted (without realizing he did) that he didn't care if an altercation ensued because he knew he had a gun..............
29 likesOr just mind your own business and let the police do their job to tell people they're not handicap and they have to move or get a ticket. Let them take a ticket instead of causing a altercation.
11 likeswho knows who said what exactly during that exchange. I'm not sure but I think he said it was almost personal to him at the beginning, taking up the handicapped space. And that it happens often. He was annoyed, so I can understand why he just told them to move. It's innocent what they did but still illegal. You don't really tell a criminal hmm just looking out for you, don't kill that guy. Not his job to reprimend people, but still I get that it's not his job either to be nice to careless people.
2 likes@Ula G A "criminal"?? 🙄 Hope you didn't jaywalk today because, according-to-you, that would make you a criminal...
9 likesThe Murderer Criminal was willing to kill over a parking spot... He knew that he was willing since he admitted he was fine with instigating a confrontation because he had his "force multiplier"... I'd rather be a parking space criminal than a murdering criminal...
@rachybaby72 lol I agree with you, all I was saying is you don't HAVE to be nice to people who technically don't deserve it. He overreacted (the lightest word to use here), which kinda makes sense psychologically since subconsciously he was already prepared to fire.
0 likesOnly pointing out you should, but sadly most likely won't be nice to people who break the law (law you apparently care about). No justification, just saying that the original comment and its solution wasn't so obvious in this situation.
Jennifer C if someone doesn’t have a handicap placard then they have no right to park in a handicap spot. It is a crime to park in one without a valid placard.
2 likes@Darth Balgarus It's a crime to jaywalk. It's a crime to smoke weed. It's a crime to kill. Which one is worse? Which one is a four-alarm fire? Which one do you normally get thrown on jail for? 🙄
4 likesUla knew what he was doing when he chose to use the word "criminal", and 'who knew what words were exchanged' is bull$hit. He was trying to impugn the victim's character and blame him for his own death. Disgusting...
@rachybaby72 a crime is a crime, and all criminals deserve to be severely punished
1 like@D@rth Balgarus Pt. 2: Oooh, and I LOVE that you revealed your tell with an opinion: "severely". Not 'punished', but "severely punished". Thank you for (easily) telegraphing your true motive. :-D You're Sick...
0 likesNah, if no one is getting hurt, mind your own damn business
2 likes@rachybaby72 imagine trying to hold the moral high ground with conditional morals
2 likes@Patricia Villanueva A crime is a crime. All people who commit crimes deserve to be brought to justice
0 likes@James Rustles test
0 likes@Darth Balgarusin this case no, that crazy man with a gun should have minded his business. That way an innocent man would still be alive.
1 like@Patricia Villanueva the dead guy shouldn't have broken the law. the victim was just doing his civic duty
0 likes@Darth Balgarus by shooting him!? You're obviously a troll lol
1 likeCrying cuz he misses his girl I bet those kids are crying because they miss their dad who they can never go see well anybody can come visit you
0 likesDoes he think he's drinking beers with the boys? He's talking like he's trying to impress people, not like his answers could land him in jail for decades. Christ.
284 likesReplies (5)
He is crazy!
2 likeshe’s just being honest
0 likesHe’s acting like a fanboy because odds are he’s a failed police officer and always wanted to be police officer his whole life. He probably thinks the cops are on his side what a naive fool lol
4 likesI think he legitimately thought he was saying all the right things. He was truly clueless
2 likesPerfect way of putting this 😂
0 likesIs it normal for lawyers to say someone that was murdered simply “expired” like this psychopath’s lawyer did? That really irked me like how could you say he “expired” it makes it sound like he died by natural causes, not that your client litterally shot and killed him over a parking spot
143 likesReplies (6)
It's courtroom verbiage. They say its easier for family hearing the case, rather than saying "killed"or"died".
26 likes@Jesus Orozco it seems dehumanizing to me, makes the victim sound like sour cream or a steak you left in your fridge too long
37 likes@Echo UV i hear you and agree with you 100% but thats what they came up with amd think it's best.
13 likesto be fair, a defense attorney's job is to represent their clients interests and speak on their behalf. Sometime the words you use have negative connotations that imply guilt. Even though we as the audience know he was guilty after watching this, the lawyers still have the duty to make sure that people are treated as "innocent until proven guilty" throughout the proceedings since even the shittiest of human beings have rights to due process.
18 likesIt’s medical terminology for died. That’s what doctors call it too.
3 likes@Jessica Michael true. When my great aunt died at the age of 86, the nurse at the hospital told me she had “expired”
1 likeNotice how his arm seems to get less and less “injured” over the course of the interview
228 likesReplies (6)
Joy Woffindin he was regenerating
24 likesHis arm was force multiplying
12 likes@C L Lol😃
0 likesC Loving 😩😂😩
0 likesLol yeah
0 likesThat’s what the human body does sometimes
0 likesAnyone who carries should also be taught how to avoid conflict, and how to de-escalate a conflict, or even leave the area if possible. Discharge of a firearm is a last-ditch option, when retreat is not possible, and bodily harm is imminent. None of these were observed by the shooter. This is one interview that IK really didn't care to hear much from the shooter, as he initiated the conflict himself. "Feeling" threatened is not sufficient cause for the use of deadly force. Police do not have a duty to withdraw and disengage, but they are still trained to de-escalate, and even they fail to do that at times. I have carried for over 25 years, but fully understand the need to restrain myself, and to differentiate between "feeling" threatened, and actually being in imminent danger.
73 likesIt was clear that the victim began to withdraw when the shooter presented a firearm, and at that point the shooter had already stopped the threat before any shots were fired. Brandishing a firearm is far less serious than homicide, and much easier to defend under the circumstances. The shooter could have left without firing a shot, but chose to retaliate rather than to defend himself. It is a shame the victim did not get that opportunity, especially when it appears he was defending his loved ones from a potential threat as well.
Replies (4)
it’s tragic.
1 likeYeah, basically this guy had just built himself up over the years to be some sort of vigilante hero (he'd already had 4 previous altercations). It's really not got anything to do with his command of gun protocol, it's got everything to do with his self-image, and maybe some fantasy of a hyper-escalated sense of threat in his head.
1 liketerra andrew I 100% agree.
0 likesA person like Drejka apparently cannot tell the difference between assault and self defense, and assumes no one else can either. People with his attitude should not even own a firearm, let alone carry one. Prison is the best place for him and anyone else who would act likewise. Michael McLaughlin had every right and reason to defend his wife and children from Drejka, and he did so without the use of lethal force. The defense attorney is as stupid as he is ignorant. I'm glad the jury had enough sense to interpret the situation for what it was.
0 likesI'm that handicapped parking monitor as well.....don't park in handicapped.
0 likesReplies (1)
Michael Drejka is not the kind of man you want to emulate...
0 likesHe feels so educated on gun use but doesn't know that shooting because you are afraid of some kicks is absolutely absurd.. He just had a sick fantasy of saving his own life with a gun and being able to brag about it
371 likesReplies (11)
@Ruby Tuesday Yeah thats even more accurate I think..
6 likes@Lord Frieza thats stupid
2 likes@Ruby Tuesday That's ridiculous. You have zero reason to think that, you are just obsessed with racism.
11 likes@Ruby Tuesday
4 likes>but that's a very probable option
How is that very probable?
>Another option is that he just wanted an excuse to kill no matter who for pleasure
There could be a hundred different options. We don't know.
A force multiplier
0 likesWhat happened here was wrong, I want to be clear about that, but kicks in the head can easily kill.
2 likes@nunya I know they can easily kill, I have a black belt in karate. But still don't shoot until they are coming closer and "some kicks" aren't formulated by him like he felt life threatened.
0 likes@Maaike Rommens I agree, the guy was clearly moving away from him. It just seemed to me you were downplaying what kicks can do, but it wasn't a factor in this case.
1 likeFl law 'stand ur ground' is dumb AF
0 likes@aceous99 What's dumb about stand your ground?
1 like@Based Lord dont mind me i just want to see when he responds and what
1 likeNote to self: lawyer up before ever talking to cops
1 likeReplies (1)
Don’t talk to cops ever
0 likesYESSSSSSSS
0 likesHe was sentenced to 20 years.
1 likealso, the narrator says you would have "no need" to be in a defensive state of mind after being shoved over 5 feet onto the concrete. He said the defendent "appealed to extremes"... That is spoken by someone who has never been completely assaulted and nose stuck into a book.
1 likeThey made him re-enact the scene perfectly with an arm that couldn’t even be lifted to shake a hand. 😂😂
308 likesReplies (6)
Funny isn't it
12 likesThat was an act
6 likesThat could've been adrenaline
1 like🤣🤣🤣🤣 bro it's funny
0 likesMy favorite part
1 like@Rainy Days haha no. Adrenaline would have dissipated at that point because he believed the police were on his side, and now he was safe, if anything he would felt sluggish from the body releasing large amounts of adrenaline from firing the gun. In an altercation he started. Weak people look for power.
1 likeSt. Matthew 6 Take heed that you do not your justice before men, to be seen by them: otherwise you shall not have a reward of your Father Lord God, the Great King who is in heaven.
0 likes2 Therefore when thou dost an almsdeed, sound not a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be honoured by men. Amen I say to you, they have received their reward.
3 But when thou dost alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth.
4 That thy alms may be in secret, and thy Father Lord God, the Great King who seeth in secret will repay thee.
5 And when ye pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites, that love to stand and pray in the synagogues and corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men: Amen I say to you, they have received their reward.
6 But thou when thou shalt pray, enter into thy chamber, and having shut the door, pray to thy Father Lord God, the Great King in secret: and thy Father Lord God, the Great King who seeth in secret will repay thee.
7 And when you are praying, speak not much, as the heathens. For they think that in their much speaking they may be heard.
8 Be not you therefore like to them, for your Father Lord God, the Great King knoweth what is needful for you, before you ask him.
9 Thus therefore shall you pray: Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name.
10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
11 Give us this day our supersubstantial bread.
12 And forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors.
13 And lead us not into temptation. But deliver us from evil. Amen.
14 For if you will forgive men their offences, your heavenly Father will forgive you also your offences.
15 But if you will not forgive men, neither will your Father Lord God, the Great King forgive you your offences.
16 And when you fast, be not as the hypocrites, sad. For they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Amen I say to you, they have received their reward.
17 But thou, when thou fastest anoint thy head, and wash thy face;
18 That thou appear not to men to fast, but to thy Father who is in secret: and thy Father Lord God, the Great King who seeth in secret, will repay thee.
19 Lay not up to yourselves treasures on earth: where the rust, and moth consume, and where thieves break through and steal.
20 But lay up to yourselves treasures in heaven: where neither the rust nor moth doth consume, and where thieves do not break through, nor steal.
21 For where thy treasure is, there is thy heart also.
22 The light of thy body is thy eye. If thy eye be single, thy whole body shall be lightsome.
23 But if thy eye be evil thy whole body shall be darksome. If then the light that is in thee, be darkness: the darkness itself how great shall it be!
24 No man can serve two masters. For either he will hate the one, and love the other: or he will sustain the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve Lord God, the Great King and mammon.
25 Therefore I say to you, be not solicitous for your life, what you shall eat, nor for your body, what you shall put on. Is not the life more than the meat: and the body more than the raiment?
26 Behold the birds of the air, for they neither sow, nor do they reap, nor gather into barns: and your heavenly Father Lord God, the Great King feedeth them. Are not you of much more value than they?
27 And which of you by taking thought, can add to his stature by one cubit?
28 And for raiment why are you solicitous? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they labour not, neither do they spin.
29 But I say to you, that not even Solomon in all his glory was arrayed as one of these.
30 And if the grass of the field, which is to day, and to morrow is cast into the oven, Lord God, the Great King doth so clothe: how much more you, O ye of little faith?
31 Be not solicitous therefore, saying, What shall we eat: or what shall we drink, or wherewith shall we be clothed?
32 For after all these things do the heathens seek. For your Father Lord God, the Great King knoweth that you have need of all these things.
33 Seek ye therefore first the kingdom of Lord God, the Great King, and his justice, and all these things shall be added unto you.
34 Be not therefore solicitous for to morrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof.
Word of the Blessed Lord God, the King. Thank You Blessed Lord God, the King and Savior Jesus Christ.
All you great numerous enemies; the enemy of the holy death of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ on the Cross of Calvary; the prince of darkness and iniquity, the father of all liars; I stand on the death of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ and offer His pains, wounds, and the Precious Blood of His left hand to the Eternal Father Lord God for your downfall, your destruction and your scourging. Amen. Precious Blood of my Lord and Master Jesus Christ - reign in me and in the lives of all men. Amen.
O holy loving Father, Lord God, the King of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Who protected the Israelites of old in His holy wings in the dryness of the cold and hot desert; I offer You the holy death of my Master and Savior, Jesus Christ, for the protection of Your people who are scattered all over the world. May the Blood and water wash and strengthen, save and cleanse us that we might find home in the Sacred Side of Your Holy Son that opens for all men. Amen. Sacred Side of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - be our home for safety. Amen.
Omnipotent and Omniscient Lord God, Lord God of Elijah and the prophets, look at the Sacred Head of Your only-begotten Holy Son and have mercy. Arise and save Your people. I offer You all the shame, the pains, the wounds and the Precious Blood from the Sacred Head of Your Holy Son for all Your children who are living in these perilous times. Strengthen our true faith through the mockery of Your Holy Son, Lord Jesus Christ, and save us through the Precious Blood from His Sacred Head. May we, through the sufferings of Your Holy Son, Jesus Christ, learn to suffer in You and die in You. Amen. Holy tortures of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - increase our true faith. Amen.
Merciful and holy loving Father Lord God, Your wish is that all men shall be saved. Kindly look on Your rejected and condemned Son Who suffered many tortures and will suffer many through the sins of Your people. Look and see what sin has done to your only-begotten Holy Son. I offer for all Your people who are living in these ungodly and wicked days, all the tortures, pains, rejection and shame of your Son, Lord Jesus Christ, to You, for the true faith to withstand trials and holy patience to withstand long torture. May they through the suffering of Your only Holy Son, fight to the end. Amen. Our Lord God, the King's torture - increase our true faith. Precious Blood of Lord God, the King Jesus Christ - save us. Amen.
More guns is needed to fix it.
0 likesReplies (1)
@Herbert West I was sarcastic.
1 like19 min for an ambulance?!
0 likesReplies (2)
That’s what I’m saying. I know from prior experience that if this had happened in a predominantly white neighborhood it would have been there in under 10
0 likesexactly!!! if this man was in a higher position it would’ve been there in a second.
0 likesDESTROYED*
0 likesHow much the dad moved towards him changed so many times. “One step, almost two, he twitched, he moved, his feet said he was coming towards me, a couple feet” he knows that the poor dad didn’t come towards him but he needed some sort of argument for what he did. And failed miserably at it
50 likesThe moment he starts realizing that the cops aren't patting him on the back and complimenting him is priceless. This dude is acting like he fouled somebody in basketball instead of shooting someone. He makes responsible gun owners look awful.
883 likesReplies (35)
@Gormless Shlorm u big mad, I'm the big homie we can square up.
2 likes@gour Ranga I ain't mad but you sure are sad homie
41 likes@Gormless Shlorm i am black white boy. U dont kno shi
2 likes@gour Ranga he can defend himself, but with reasonable force to the threat presented. Shooting the man was unreasonable. It was excessive seeing as he just pushed him and was unarmed.
42 likes@gour Ranga just cause your black doesn’t mean u have an excuse to be racist
32 likes@gour Ranga you’re embarrassing af😹
28 likesThe only problem with that statement is there are far too many gun owners who would probably do what he did, only they haven't been stuck in a situation like this yet. Too many gun owners think they are responsible but probably aren't.
3 likesIt’s almost like something like this is bound to happen as if you let the public own military equipment it’s quite possible some people will be irresponsible.
1 like@gour Ranga why did you bring race into it literally nothing to do with race a man was trying to provoke a female alone in the car and her husband came out to defend her and got murdered people need to decide who is handicapped or or not or illegally parked
3 likes@rafer Jefferson iii a Glock is military equipment lol?
0 likes@avenger31X preventing government tyranny while having the highest per capita prison population in the developed world
3 likes@avenger31X tf are you replying to lmao I said skin color was not relevant
1 likeAgreed.
0 likes@Lex who mentioned a shotgun? What about an AR15, with tactical pistols, bullet proof vests and bump stocks?
1 likeWhat about Las Vegas? What about the school shootings you have it seems every month?
Everyone’s a “responsible gun owner” until they decide they aren’t anymore.
You can talk about good areas and bad areas until the cows come home. We have a few bad districts in inner cities too. Yet we don’t have the same murder and violent crime rate.
As I’ve said before, keep your guns, you can’t solve the issue you have. Nobody is giving them back.
All I’m saying is it’s a stupid way to run a society and you should just approach it as a mistake the US made historically, rather than something to be proud of, as the entire world can see the violence, the over zealous police. The paranoia every time someone puts their hands in their pockets in an argument. We can all see it, and when we hear BS about good guys and bad guys we all know full well that we aren’t living in some criminal controlled gangland and things can be extremely peaceful and non-tyrannous without the need to own military equipment.
@Shyann Richards I don't like able-bodied people, especially if they come across thuggish parking in handicap spaces either but if I was carrying a gun, I definitely wouldn't say anything I might report it to the police, but that would be the extent of it.
1 likeIt's not worth saying anything, there's too many thuggish people out there and two wrongs don't make a "right" no way over a parking space is it justified, using deadly force, if you're carrying a weapon you have to think of that before you even initiate a contact where it can go, you don't want to get put in a position where you have to draw- down let alone fire on somebody if you have a C.C.W
@Kathy J it's not worth getting into it with somebody and having it escalate to a point where you need to use deadly force over a parking space? That's not your civic duty, it's not worth it in this day and age, with all the violent people around to even say anything to a stranger, if you're not in some official capacity, where you can actually write a citation.
0 likes@Frank Paya I honestly didn't realize when I wrote my comment cuz I used talk to text that it sounds weird but also I really don't think it has anything to do with race I just think two people were in the wrong no he shouldn't have pushed him like that that literally should have never happened but it wasn't something someone should lose their life over it that's it I think that nobody has the right to take somebody else's life away you don't get to make that decision and I really truly believe that if you have a gun you need to take hours and hours of safety and not walk around acting like you're big and bad because you have a gun
0 likes@Frank Paya totally agree!
1 like@avenger31X It is depending on what country you live in.. numerous militaries around the world use Glocks..
0 likes@rafer Jefferson iii idiotic comment
0 likes@gour Ranga well he pulled his gun and dude backed away so I think that was enough there he could have then got in his car and left but he shot a man who was backing up and no longer a deathly threat
0 likes@gour Ranga HE PUSHED HIM? that is NOT cause for use of deadly force? u wouldn’t last a day on my streets if you started drawing your weapon everytime someone got pushed.
1 likeAgreed
0 likesI carry daily, and this man brings nothing but disrepute to us.
@Lily lily I would be quiet if I were you I know you’re 500 pounds in real life
0 likes@gour Ranga "defend themselves,"
0 likes@avenger31X you soft like cotton my brotha
0 likes@Nikki W • 69 years ago nikki is big mad
0 likes@gour Ranga I do understand where ur coming from, as i grew up inna violent ass area everyone knew if u hit somebody u bound to get blasted n its smth u expect, but the way this man rly thought the murder was justified by law was kinda funny to me
1 like@Nikki W • 69 years ago nikki more like Becky
0 likes@Serena Hope Isabella Welcome to the hood.
0 likes@Jon Mancuso It seems like trailers are on your mind bruh. Did you just move into a new double wide?
0 likes@gour Ranga No, I live in a big house on the west coast and have a really good job. My life rocks.
0 likes@Tim Nelson I know this is anecdotal but I’ve lived in a community full of gun owners my entire life and I have never once worried about getting shot
0 likes@Mani I live in a rural area of the US
0 likesThere are bears here
What do I do if someone is getting mauled by a bear? Try to stab it?
@Normal Human no. knives can kill people. you have to try to reason with the bear, violence is never an option
0 likesWow, one minute it's another day at the gas station and the next you're gone. All the father knew was that his wife was in trouble. I can only imagine what the father thought in that moment. If this scumbag didn't have a gun he wouldn't of even thought about getting involved. Hurts my heart that this really happened to a family
310 likesReplies (18)
"All the father knew was that his wife was in trouble." Actually no she wasn't. The guy escalated it immediately to a fight and got himself killed. That was the exact WRONG move for him to make.
44 likesIt is very sad for the family. But this is a case of TWO men both doing the wrong thing. The boyfriend shoving a man to the ground was committing battery. That was completely unnecessary. The man firing a gun back committed murder out of anger. Both men committed violent crimes to different degrees. Clearly, shooting is far worse than shoving. Neither one of these men was an innocent victim. If the boyfriend had just come out and confronted the guy verbally and asked him what the hell he was doing, there is a good chance he would have gone home that evening with his family. However, I suspect Mr Drejka would eventually have ended up in jail or dead from some other incident.
43 likes@Connection Lost Yep, the father started the violence and paid for it with his life.
22 likes@Don Cross to be fair we have no idea what the man was saying to his wife. I mean just looking at his hand gestures he definitely wasn't being calm. And the husband didnt have any context besides seeing that he was literally in his girls face. If it were me I wouldnt have waited for him to get any closer. I 100% would have tried to get between him and my girl or move him away from her. Maybe not exactly to the extent of shoving him to the ground, but pushing him back a bit or grabbing his shoulders and moving him away while asking him what the fuck he was doing in my girls face.
28 likes@sexysolaire you are ridiculous. This whole situation should have never happened.
21 likesWe can play the what if game all day but we both know the boyfriend should not have pushed mr. threat neutralised, and mr. threat neutralised should not have shot a man backing away.
You can’t justify pushing a person because the other guy committed murder. Both offences are criminal, one definitely has more permanent consequences than the other
@sexysolaire no one is showing sympathy to the murderer. They’re just saying that the father shoving him and escalating the situation was a very bad move and ended with him dying. The father, obviously, did not deserve to die for this, but he still should not have escalated the situation.
19 likes@çelikhan savaş You need to seek help. No one in their right mind would assert death is called for in a minor crime. The point is that the Dunn and Drejka cases are aberrations. In ALMOST ALL cases, if you stand up to ‘folks’ from the ‘hood, that are committing minor crimes like blasting music, etc, then it will be YOU who are attacked (and perhaps even die).
4 likesIn the Dunn & Drejka cases, it is the boys from the ‘hood who were the ones attacked.
NOW—>That’s a RARE situation
@Don Cross I couldn't agree more.
0 likes@Connection Lost he didn’t deserve to get shot tho a gun didn’t even need to be pulled he just pushed him then stood there he didn’t charge him or nothing then when the guns pulled he backs up there that’s it situation done that’s the farthest it should have gotten gun pulled dude backs up u get up and leave and no one’s hurt or dead but no u not only pull ur gun on a man who just pushed u and stood there u proceed to shoot him once he backs up a couple steps craziness
4 likes@外国人 symbiote what are you even saying?
3 likes@Melatonin It’s bad when my name in another language and I cringe trying to find out what yours even means
0 likes@Timmy Vawwter HAHAHAHAHA! You.... My god...
1 like@sexysolaire he attacked a man he didn't know and you don't do that as you don't know what that man is capable of, is he a schizophrenic, mad, is he carrying? His mistake was that if you knock a man down you make sure he stays down, not turn your back to him, neutralize him. If he'd been army he would have known that. His own fault and his family has to live with it.
0 likesHow dare that white guy ask a black person to observe rules! The gall!
1 like@外国人 symbiote again, what are you even saying? My dude, get a dictionary and open it
0 likes@sexysolaire 2 IQ statement
0 likesNo one should get their hands put on them for words or screaming. Obviously we will in a world where people have to defend they hurt feelings, but if that guy never out his hands on Bro he wouldn’t of died. And no he didn’t deserve to die, and the shooter was wrong, but again would of never happened if the guy never out his hands on him in the first place.
0 likes@GreenMeanNumber4 Official sucks dude died, but don't act like he didn't have any other choice or was even remotely justified in pushing this dude. Same shit happens here in Baltimore. High school dropouts think words give you the right to physically attack people. It's sad.
0 likesThe guy was just waiting for the right confrontation to "showcase" his self defense training. May be if he had remained silent and talked to a lawyer instead, he could have gotten out easily.
161 likesReplies (4)
Having representation would have made the prosecutors job more difficult, but the video is damning. Not only that, he has a history of starting shit with people.
5 likesYea, what point would you think this trailer park tommy would get off free?
2 likesI am not sure if it’s damming. There is no audio, he could have claimed to have warned the person killed and he still kept making threats and getting closer. The video also shows him coming up unexpectedly when he was taking to wife and pushing him so he can argue he was startled and scare (which he probably was to an extent) so it partially would support him.
0 likesAnd it would depend on what he did in the past, but I think a lawyer could still work this to a mild sentence. It’s this questioning here and his responses that are damming.
@Sara Samaletdin Oh really? Then why didnt he mention that in the interrogation genius.
0 likesThis is a great channel, love it!…
26 likesOk, I’m not in or from America, but why oh why do these people talk to the cops in these interrogations?…Especially in The USA? Do these suspects think these cops are psychologists, “someone” to open up to? Never ever ever ever talk to the Police, innocent or guilty!….Lawyer up immediately! After listening to legal advice and you know that you’re innocent, then maybe talk a bit with a lawyer present. If you’re guilty, never utter a word, and have a lawyer present for any possible discussion and point to him when the detectives question you!
However, having said that, I watch these videos because I do like to see the guilty get outwitted! It’s entertaining and fascinating at the same time! Like reading a murder mystery book or something!
Also just one other point, an afterthought I guess. I really hope when a cop shoot’s someone, they likewise get a similar interrogation experience. I want to believe it is always this way for officers being interrogated, but I’d settle for maybe 50% of the time, hopefully more! I’m not anti-police or anything, I have some in my family who are good men. Peace!✌️
Replies (1)
@Aiden Stroisch I agree!
0 likesIt's frustrating that after Dreka was made aware of the footage, and it was probably shown to everyone (including himself) in court, that he still stuck to his story.
35 likesHe could have just admitted to what he did and told the truth. "I panicked, I made a mistake and killed a man when I didn't have to"
Replies (2)
Yes, I was wondering all the way through why he didn't say this. "I honestly thought he was coming for me and I feared for my life. Having seen the footage I can see that in the heat of the moment I was mistaken. I feel terrible but I honestly thought I had not choice in that moment." Perfectly plausible, if not entirely convincing.
9 likes@QuincelSC there's no way to reasonably believe he feared for his own life and was justified. The dude was literally backing up as much as he can. Admitting and presenting it in the way you did probably would have resulted in a reduced sentence and honestly from a media point of view it would have benefited him but tbh I think he's a racist and does not have any remorse for the victim.
1 likeThe way he goes “aaah left hand” and also struggled to use that arm to shake the detectives hand, then flails it around in the air talking. And continues to act normally when not thinking about having to be in pain.
19 likesAlso, never once did he seem remorseful for what he had done. Only said “thank you for telling me that.” When they told him he died. Nothing in his voice. He only had remorse for himself.
Why doesnt anyone ever remain silent? Thats a right we have and we should always use it. There is nothing a suspect can gain by talking to police. Even innocent people can only stand to lose by speaking with the law.
22 likesReplies (2)
I think it has something to do with the age old idea that "only guilty people need legal counsel" and said guilty people (and sometimes innocent people) feel that they need to do whatever necessary to appear innocent even if it is to their detriment. They are in the flight or fight response so aren't thinking critically.
2 likesIdk but I’m glad he did he deserves way more than the 20 years he got
2 likesAnother interesting point this video makes is to never assume the cops are on your side, only speak to a lawyer
1 likeThis guy assumed from the start that he was going to not only be exonerated, but would be hailed a hero.
8 likes"I'm not worried about safety in that parking lot, I never have been."
Yet, you feel the need to carry a firearm and shoot someone while you're there? Because you felt "safe?"
I’ve learned from JCS that when a detective says “cross our t’s and dot our i’s” you are about to be sewed up with a murder charge.
9 likesThe lesson here, unless a person is attempting to assault you or someone with you, keep your hands to yourself. You just don't know how it's going to turn out. The shooter should have minded his own business. He obviously has a lose connection in the head. Hopefully he goes to jail for a very long time. It's a sad crazy world we are in. Because of it I carry for protection. I do my best to avoid people and confrontation. I go out of my way to do so. I mind my business and all I ask is don't mess with me.
2 likesThis man is disgusting, the fact that that poor man ran back to see his son one last time broke my heart, because I wish my father loved me that much
11 likesReplies (4)
@Gabe Shaw did you watch the video? He shot the guy even when he backed off, he didn’t engage. You are the problem
4 likes@Gabe Shaw dude it doesn’t matter if I’m scared, this isn’t about me. It’s about this guy killing this man for no reason other than his own. He is in the wrong. Anyone willing to take a life with no remorse doesn’t deserve the life they have.
2 likes@Gabe Shaw again, you are the problem.
2 likes@Gabe Shaw You should keep away from people
1 likeThis could have 100% been avoided if dude had just MINDED HIS OWN DAMN BUSINESS
120 likesReplies (8)
he legit parked illegally, to yell at someone for parking illegally… if he would’ve just _not _ confronted them, everything would’ve been fine :(
10 likesMaybe, if the thug haven't pushed him too
16 likesthankyou
0 likes@Mike Taylor are you serious?
10 likes@Mike Taylor this is colored language . Trump jr.
3 likes@Conform x Freethink for the record I think this guy was completely in the wrong....and deserves to be locked up...dont bring politics into this
0 likes@Ghu Super yes because pulling your pants up and putting your hands on your waist is "setting your stance to fight" okay.
2 likesShould people illegally park? No.
0 likesDo people have the right to confront strangers while not being violent? Yes.
Do people have their rights to push/assault strangers? No.
Does someone have the right to shoot someone who is backing away? No.
Could either of them deescalated the situation?
Could the lady have moved her car instead of going round and round?
Could the victim have tried to figure out what’s going on?
Should the defendant have verbally warned the victim to get back or he will shoot?
There is plenty of comparative fault in this situation.
Why don’t we look at the faults of both parties rather than jump to baseless emotionalism?
Initially the victim and his wife were firstly in the wrong for parking where they did, the victim then was in the wrong for assaulting - up until that right the defendant himself did nothing wrong. I don’t even see where the defendant ever knew the woman even had a boyfriend, so it wasn’t pre
Meditated.
I’ve been assaulted before and it makes your adrenaline go crazy. It’s easy to over react in that situation. Odds are he may have not even seen him taking a step back or it may have not registered. Nonetheless a life was lost and it was clear the victim was backing away so the defendant was guilty of something.
I believe in the jury system and justice was served but this isn’t a black and white situation and there are a lot of nuances. I can appreciate a system that allows 12 individuals to weigh a situation out and come to a determination of guilt or innocence.
Drejka strikes me as a real mall ninja. Wants to appear like he’s prior military or LEO by his haircut, presentation and use of jargon. He clearly felt as though he was some kind of Paul Blart “protector” of that establishment.
4 likesThat’s usually pretty harmless, but when said individual is also a total coward, having a gun is a recipe for disaster. He initiated the confrontation out of a need for power, and when he was met with the slightest amount of force, he justified killing a man (in his mind).
An honest tragedy, brought on by a dork on a power trip. He’s earned every minute of his time behind bars.
Replies (1)
Agree 100%
1 likeI love how there's no commentary whatsoever over the Prosecution. Nothing extra needs to be added, the prosecution said absolutely everything that needed to be said.
2 likesObviously it's good that this guy was found out and imprisoned, but does anyone know how it likely it is he would have gotten away with it had he not said a word and instead requested to speak to a lawyer?
0 likesHe literally went into this knowing it was going to get physical. He 100% wouldn't even have confronted the mother if he didn't have a gun in his possession.
6 likesThe shove to the ground gave him the opportunity that he had been awaiting for 25 to 26 years.
23 likesThat shot wasn't out of fear for his life; it was out of retaliation for being shoved to the ground.
I can absolutely understand him drawing his weapon but he FAILED to completely assess the situation; His emotions along with the fact that he was a coward took over...
Clear threat, what a joke these defence lawyers are. He's pointed his gun 4 times at other motorists, God help you if you accidentally pull out on him, u get shot and killed. He definitely should not have a gun permit, no way. He's also a liar
0 likesI like how he tried explaining how he was so hurting and everything and when the cop realized it was just sore he did not give a shit
0 likesI’m coloring on my iPad as I’m watching/listening to this video and the suspect’s story of what happened isn’t making sense to me; like, he’s coming off as if he’s trying to make himself sound like the “hero” in the shooting. What I love about the surveillance video, is that it tells a completely DIFFERENT story than what the suspect says what happened.
0 likesHe's the type of guy who wants to be saluted but never served.
4 likesThe most amazing thing about this is that this guy says he's retired at 48.
1 liketo me this case has some kind of racial bias in that the shooter may have believed the altercation could have been dangers on the victim's part because of the false stereotype that african americans are predisposed to violence (which couldn't be more idiotic). i also think that the victim and his wife may have thought the shooter was trying to break into the car and impose danger upon the mother and her children, and this assumption could have led to the initiation of the confrontation. i believe this case is associated with a misunderstanding beteeen an innocent family and a man with a superiority complex, which unfortunately led to the death of an innocent man.
2 likesnot that anyone asked for my point of view.... lol
Note to self: if I ever happen to commit a crime, NEVER answer any questions without a lawyer present
0 likesReplies (1)
Even if you don't and you're talking to police reserve the 5th and ask for a lawyer.
0 likesNo signs of remorse whatsoever….it’s like he feels what he did was justifiable, the children have no father really sad..🥺
0 likesProsecutor: "You shot to death a man who pushed you."
2 likesDrejka: "Well yeah, but he started it."
This is a perfect example of why it should be mandatory to receive proper training if you're gonna have a permit to carry. 99% of people with a gun don't even know how TF to take it apart or even properly use the dam thing. Need to actually train with the fuckin thing multiple times a week to even have a chance of it making a difference if you DID need it! Oh, and it was definitely fueled by race... if it was a hot white chick, he would've walked up to the car for a whole different reason.
8 likesThe problem from the start is that this guy decided that he was an enforcer. He believed he not only had a duty, but a privilege, but correct and scold anyone in public for doing anything he believes to be illegal. In reality, of course people without disabled tags shouldn't park in handicap, it's a jerk move, but it isn't up to anyone but the owners/employee's and police, to do a thing about it, and that "thing", is simply to call a tow truck or give them a fine. It isn't to confront them. White dudes really need to stop believing they are in charge of society and get to reprimand everyone.
2 likesReplies (1)
ABSOLUTELY
0 likesI noticed how a man held the door for the woman behind him. a simple act of kindness before a family is split apart.
12 likesReplies (1)
@Trollashnikov Avtomat I mean probably
0 likesThe guys self promoted himself into the cop of the parking lot
3 likesAlthough Drejka considered it "My store," in offering his bs account of the events, he somehow didn't realize the place had outdoor security cameras.
1 likeInteresting observation (altough meaningless).
0 likesHad the incident occured exactly as he described and indicated when he sat on the floor. At the one moment when, upon adding both hands to hold the gun, ha motioned as though losing balance and leaning backwards. An argument could have been made that amidst disorientation, you could confuse distance and even falsely believe for a moment that movement occured when it didn't, particularly motions towards and away.
Buuuuuut the CCTV completely disproves that such a motion occured, so doesn't matter.
Having a firearm permit can make anyone BRAVE, BOLD AND DANGEROUS. Their hands would start to get itchy to USE THAT THING and they're gonna come up with different ways to make that happen. THEY'RE GONNA CREATE SUCH SITUATIONS AND USE IT AND THEN TRY TO PLAY THE " DEFENDING " PART.
0 likes"I'm a very cautious person I have my permit" the cop on his phone texting his boss "we got this idiot"
2 likesThe amount of violence a person uses is generally in relation to how much violence they think they can get away with.
1 likeExcept when it comes to their immediate family, then all bets are off.
Replies (2)
@Gabe Shaw There is one great truth and that is when a person commits a violent act they always believe they used far less force than the person on the receiving
1 likeend perceives it be.
This then leads that person to strike back with much a harder force than the one they experienced and so on as the violence grows greater and greater.
The original violence began with the verbally abusive acts by the convicted killer.
@Gabe Shaw
1 likeIs English your second language and you truly don't understand the difference between talking and being verbally abusive.
I live in Clearwater and was about 2 miles away when this happened. It was nuts.
1 likeThis happened down the street from my old job. Just unnecessary
1 likeDude walked around for 26 years just itching to pull the trigger on someone
1 likeIs anyone else suprised they take a gun into the room? I know they all carry firearms but do they ever leave them outside?
0 likesLmao his lawyer complaining about the quality of the footage although you can clearly see everything they used against him regardless of the "wavy lines" he said he saw
1 likeeasiest day for those cops, dude was really talking like he had a good shoot
0 likesThey really need to add the questions on the firearms background check , Have you ever been called a Karen or accused of being a Karen?
2 likesFrom a fiscal confrontation that scalate to the death of a human being , unnecessary use of a gun 🤔
0 likesWait this is now the second tree trimmer guy on JCS?! (Christmas with Cliff). And there’s seems to be a lot of commonality between the two. Both wanna be bad assess, seem insecure.
1 likeImagine living with a dude like this
1 likeMicheal: Yeah, and then I like, totally shot him (smirks), kind of a badass moment if I do say so myself (chuckles and crosses his arms matter of factly)
2 likesCop: Sir, you’re being sentenced to 20 years
guys have you realized the guilty have a lot of thirst compared to the innocent. so far most of the videos I have watched all the guys keep drinking as if its hot in there
2 likes39:30 messed a good opportunity to at least lie and say hed change everything he did
0 likesI’m back rewatching all your videos for the 3 time, this is just such good background noice haha
1 likeSpeaking of "self defense", what is going on with the popcorn killer? The guy who killed someone for texting in the movie theater?
0 likesTacticool hobo attire 😂 the cargo shorts, flops and oversized button up concealment garment. I wouldn't leave the house like that if I was blind.
1 likeIf he wanted to be traffic warden and police handicap spots, why didn't he do it for a living. A right old busybody who thinks he can take law in to his own hands. But to shoot someone for pushing you, overkill or what
1 likeCop: So what if the video footage showed that he was actually backing up when you shot him?
0 likesGI Joe wannabe: I would disagree
🤔
"I didn't want to go overboard"......
42 likesShooting someone because they pushed you is GOING OVERBOARD!
He probably did it because he knew it would only be 30 years max to kill someone he was so jealous of he felt it would be worth it
0 likesOf course he uses all the “personal protection” dork language
1 likeIt will always be bonkers to me how you lot walk around carrying guns and shit, wtf bros
1 like16:29 Officer: Was the car running? Drejka: "I couldn't tell. It's so quiet. These damn cars."
0 likesDamn cars? What, he's angry that some cars are too quiet? Huh?????
He talks about the self defense like he reads and watches too many "tactical" videos lmao
0 likesAll of this would have been avoided if you had just minded your own damn business 😒
0 likesHe got pushed after arguing about a disabled space being used by a non disabled person, it obviously boils his piss...he then took a life because the boyfriend was going to kick his ass. People get angry quick and carrying a gun, well, this shit is going to happen on a regular basis.
0 likesThank god i was bt to flip out if they said he ain't guilty
0 likesYou should really do something against your liberal weapon laws in the states… Other countries dont have such Problems
1 likeVery sad indeed.drayke did not show any sypethy or a care in the world about what he's just done.
0 likesHe never has any remorse at all ever .he had NO Right to shoot some one.at point blank range.. he got an appropriate sentence for his crime.
He started.and could of prevented it any Time.
Justice is served in the end
No gun on his hip and he wouldn’t have said a word to the lady in the handicap spot. He initiated and ended the altercation in less than 30 seconds…he’s been chomping at the bit to use that gun!
0 likesIt's like watching Dwight K Schruit snitch on himself
0 likesJust caught this, the 21 foot rule does not require a weapon to be applicable.
0 likesWhat would be the outcome if he would not have talked to police? What if he stated it was an accidential discharge?
1 likeHow does this person not say in his final interview that he wishes the guy he shot might have lived? It doesn't admit any ground in terms of a self defense case but could only make him look better. Truly horrifying that he actually is living that life right now. Complete denial and inability to express any remorse.
1 likeI like it better when the perp stews for an hour or two. This coward thinks he’s going home until he knows he’s not. Good riddance.
0 likesIf this was in England that guy would have got up off the floor and got back in his car.When people argue they need guns to defend themselves against bad guys, this is what they mean. Thank god for the cameras or he’d be free.
1 likeHe was sitting there writing "I am F´CKED!" over and over on his notepad.
0 likesThis guy had been having this wet dream for years and finally got to act it out. What a pos.
2 likesAlthough watching him tie himself up in knots because he thought he was justified was satisfying to watch. If he had shut up and got a lawyer he would have walked
Lawyer: "Mr Drejka was the victim here."
5 likes... Tell that to the man he shot. Oh, right, you can't. Because he's DEAD.
Shameful.
Replies (1)
Lawyers have to defend the person no matter what they personally think about the case. If not it wouldn’t be fair
0 likesthe cop is listing out all the possibilities of threatening positions or movements that the victim could have portrayed after stating that in fact he did not walk towards him but did the exact opposite. the suspect denies all of them. didn't see his hands, didn't see his facial expressions, no words were exchanged, didn't see a weapon, basically saying he wasn't theatened.... then says "i know he was a black guy, that's all"
0 likes24:43 time to ask to see your lawyer
0 likes100% guilty
1 likeJUSTICE WINS AGAIN
0 likesThis guy with his telling lies like there isn't surveillance footage!
0 likes“never have been a fighter” yeah it shows, bud.
2 likesNot for nothing but they virtually never care about the law. Hard to believe law breakers have a hard time with police.
0 likes30 years? 30 years?! THAT is the maximum sentence? He can come out of prison still alive. Why does he deserve life when he took the life of an innocent defenseless man?
1 likeReplies (4)
@Drake London Figures...
0 likesDo you realize that said 'innocent' man committed a felony right before he was shot & killed?
1 like@Primacia He committed the crime of battery. Which is a felony. And you characterize the deceased as a purely innocent man?
1 likeAnd a defenseless man? The shooter was completely blindsided by a 20 year younger and much taller and stronger man. If this guy had not committed a murder he would be by far the more sympathetic figure here.
@Anon Ymous Basically. Although I was much more civil about it and still got an "omg gasp!" response lol
0 likesThe eyes of fear are big Absolutely unjustified killing.
0 likesReal crime is that it took 19 mins for help to arrive.
0 likesThis dude really thinks highly of himself yikes
1 like"No reason to go overboard"
0 likesafter going waaaay overboard
Blood thirsty he was looking for trouble
2 likesThis all goes back to the belief that some people have that THEY have the right to police other people.
1 likeReplies (1)
@Gift omg "scamdemic"?!?! y'all weirdos realliy getting great at protemanteaus.
0 likesDon't park in handicap spots without a placard. 😂
0 likesCan we talk about the guy falling asleep at 48:02
0 likesI really hated the defence attorney, not because he was defending an 'almost' racist killer, but because of how patronising it was to listen to the lawyer
3 likesActually I'd indct for murder. Mike initiated the situation that he claimed dangerous enough to kill for. Marquis pushed him because he insulted girl. He turned in defense. Murder.
2 likesThe news making it about race and then complaining about the jury not being diverse enough is such a news thing to do
0 likesSo he was doing black magic and then pull out power off bullet incitement so which entity was he conferring Raphael Green I see everything clearly
0 likesI don't think people should retire. Having something to occupy your mind is very important. "Idle hands are the devil's workshop"
0 likes“No reason to go overboard”
0 likesWhy is it that lawyers that defend guilty people are so c r e e p y????
0 likesWho doesn't know that in America 2021 you aren't allowed to challenge a certain fragile demographic about their criminal wrong-doing?
1 likeReplies (1)
Are you a cop? Live and let live bro
0 likesHe he got 20 years in prison at his sentencing.
0 likesThe US is insane to let urban civilians own guns. In the wilds I suppose there is a small reason to do so for protection and hunting. But to be allowed to carry a gun when shopping is crazy. The number of deaths by firearms in the US is astronomical compared to any other modern democracy. A shameful statistic for a country so boastful of its freedoms.
0 likesThat wasn't manslaughter, it was murder. A family is without a husband, father, brother, son because a racist would-be gunslinger carries a weapon with him when he goes to buy groceries.
Do we have to be concerned with the wellbeing of others? No. And that is just fine.
0 likesMoral of the story: MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS.
1 likeEven if i waa handicaped i wouldn't even confront some one parked illegaly on handicaped space , ill just park the closest and make surw they see me struggling to get out and go in the store
0 likesI will exagerate so the can see me and hopefully they wont do it again
This is why US gun laws need to change, 100%
1 likeDamn I gotta get checked out by that forensics specialist.
0 likesI watched this on Active Self Protection.
0 likesHe took away those kids' father. Hope he rots in jail, its senseless and pure evil.
1 likeThe fact that he thought that the cops knew what "force multiplier" meant, shows how deluded he is into thinking he's "one of them" (and also the terms he uses: negative, neutralize threat, etc)
54 likesThese videos are always proof that you can't underestimate how fast racists will come into these comments to pathetically attempt to justify a black man's death lmao
2 likesYep could of aimed for leg too, he aimed high for a torso shot.
0 likesForce multiplier 🤓
0 likesAt the end of the day what difference is it going to make about who parked where?
2 likesReplies (1)
@Gabe Shaw Was it worth going to prison? And who is " Your Community?
0 likesJoey the want to be Peace Officer was playing Dirty Harry for the day. Dangerous type.
0 likesFirst amendment… give every fool a gun 🇱🇷
0 likesLmao is my guy asleep in court at 48:00
0 likes“Jim Can’t Swim” has the best interrogation analysis videos on the internet, hands down! I know my shit, you got a gift for this.
0 likesYall skip to 47:47 and tell me that's not hilarious.
0 likesForce Multiplier 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👏👏👏👏👏
0 likesHe is gunna get his prison wallet stretched.
0 likesThese stand your ground tools really have to start considering the kneecap
0 likesReplies (3)
@Gabe Shaw Comment section tough guy and a know it all- chance of death from a kneecap shot, maybe 3/10 at most- doesn't surprise me that you need a gun to protect yourself lol
0 likes@Gabe Shaw Your grasp of grammar, spelling, and common sense are all tenuous at best- all of those are pretty good indicators of general intelligence- which I think you're most likely lacking
0 likes@Gabe Shaw Shooting someone in the upper body is far more dangerous than the lower body- you disagree with that- I think you're wrong, you think I'm wrong- I'm good leaving it right there
0 likesMichael "hips don't lie" Drejka
0 likesThe black man had no respect for the parking, secondly the female shouldn't of opened her mouth and third of all the black man's intention was to get violent. So, it is do or die.
0 likesWhy don't they respect the parking space for people that really needs it. What a shame. Thank you Sir for speaking out for the handicap parking 👊
Replies (1)
Ok? But killing someone over it lmao.
0 likesit's tragic that a life was lost because of something as trivial as parking in a handicapped spot. This guy was clearly just looking for an excuse to shoot somebody that day
108 likesReplies (2)
This all could've been avoided if the dude didn't feel the need to approach them in the first place. He just wanted to be a jackass to somebody to feel entitled and ended up being a murderer.
3 likesYeah, he clearly was. Please judge over people more :)
0 likesmcglockton killed with a glock... bitter irony
1 likeWow, that's a techno dj name if I've seen any.
0 likes42:32 defence was reeealy goin in on video quality like its not pretty good for an outdoor stripmall camera "not completely representative" fuck outa here
0 likesI’m sorry, but the news always bringing race into every crime is just ridiculous
0 likeswtf was the green eggs and ham sh!t about?... 🧐
0 likes“Don’t push.”
1 like-Stewie Griffin
Words to live by.
Replies (1)
@Gabe Shaw Surely you’re not inferring that the fine young colourful gentleman who violently assaulted Mr. Drejka is responsible for his own actions and the controller of his own fate, are you? Because that kind of wrongthink can get you into a lot of trouble around here, mister! 😉
0 likesyou dont shoot someone over a parking situation you may want to but it's not wise
0 likesOk, is it me or does his defense attorney sound like he’s patronizing the jury? Lol I hated him immediately
3 likesA lesson here is that escalating a situation involving words by getting physical opens up a huge realm of possibility. You never know how insane the other guy is.
34 likesReplies (1)
Alternative lesson, mind your own business and don’t try to enforce petty law because you never know how irritable the other person is.
4 likesSo Firearms to erveryone makes your life safer??? Sry America I just don´t get it. There is just no Szenario, that anybody dies in this situation, without a gun in this public space. sry for my english^^
1 likeMy Dad told me this a long time ago, there isn't any more dangerous than a scared coward.
164 likesReplies (7)
Your dad obviously never faced sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads
22 likesYes! That's so true. I like that.
7 likesI'm a dog trainer - I work with rescuing and rehabilitating dogs. On a regular basis, I am hired for dogs that people think are aggressive, mean, dominant, etc. But the most aggressive & dangerous dogs (applies for all animals) are the ones that are fearing for their well-being.
Extremely nervous drivers are the most dangerous drivers. That applies to everything!
Mmm....that's good. Agreed.
1 likeThis guy wasn't scared, he was pissed because the guy shoved his Bubba ass to the ground and he was embarrassed
1 likeOmg my dad told me this too!
0 likes@Stargazer Lily Damn right!
0 likesor a quiet mild mannered person
0 likesWe call his kind a yellow belly.
0 likesHe didn't mind his own business. He put himself in that situation just because he had a gun.
469 likesReplies (14)
Pretty much this. He's fishing for a situation where he could pull out his gun and kill someone in self defense.
53 likesBecause it’s HIS store🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️really? To say it’s his store is ridiculous! Just because I go to a restaurant every day, it does t mean I own it!
22 likes@Marina Keller even if it was the owner of the store, self defense is defined as killing someone because you BELIEVE that your life or someone else’s life is in danger.
4 likes@Terry Fulds Gaming The guy pushed him to the ground and stood back after he was arassing his wife and wouldn't live, he in response shot and killed him.
16 likesAfter watching a buch of these videos , I'm starting to get scared of visiting america ,It's like everyone has a gun and tries to find any reason to shoot it, I mean, I might just get shot for looking at someone funny ,like imagine this situation happening in europe or some other place
6 likesBest case scenario : black guy pushes white guy ,he gets a little bruise , his ego gets hurt a little bit and NOBODY DIES
Worst case scenario : black guy starts beating up the white guy in the ground but since they are in a middle of a gas station somebody would probably tried to diffuse the situation and then again, NOBODY DIES
@Shh my pup is sleepin the way he kept repeating “my store” was very telling. You can’t separately one fact from another.
4 likesguy from europe here. in my country there's not even access to hand guns let alone automatics. guess how many shootings in last 5 years we had?
2 likes@Shh my pup is sleepin he was looking for trouble, he found it. At the end of video, they said that he did it before, only this time 3 kids lost their dad.
4 likes@Terry Fulds Gaming terry it’s in your best interest to learn what self defense actually is. In a public setting proving self defense is much harder than when you’re protecting your home. even in states with castle doctrine you aren’t allowed to shoot someone just because they’re an intruder in your home. Someone has to believe their life is in actual danger to be cleared of a shooting. This isn’t my opinion these are facts. For your sake and the sake of gun owners stop justifying obvious bad shoots, it’s not a good look on the 2a community.
3 likesif youre not handicapped you shouldnt park on handicap spots
0 likesI can't tell if you're joking or not, but if not, then this is prob why he's scared of visiting, other countries think America is full of racists. Hard to convince them otherwise at this point. @OG Bob Bob
0 likesNot everyone in the U.S. is a trigger happy, wanna be cop, gun nut. :) @Eduard
0 likes@Jack Tilghman yes, of course , but just the fact that anyone can get a gun is scary ,it gives too much power to the average guy , like uncle ben once said with great power comes great responsibility but a lot of people don't have the responsibility , I mean ,even I could shoot someone if I had a gun, in a bad day , in the heat of the moment ,or even just for morbid curiosity , people do stupid shit
0 likes@Hatin Life its not his job or duty to police it, nor did he know whether they were disabled or not
0 likesGoogle 'killed/shot/stabbed over parking' and you'll realize just how many lives are destroyed by someone wanting to play parking warden.
1126 likesReplies (41)
And then our FBI agents will come for us
11 likesIt is our job as citizens to make sure people aren’t taking advantage of the handicapped.
27 likesA side effect of laws that let anyone carry a gun and feel like tough guys because of it.
58 likes@Ainsley Oliver Nah bro that's the cops job, not yours.
107 likesThe combination of people getting upset over the smallest things, and people having easy access to guns is really scary. The amount of stories like this I've read online, e.g. people getting shot for telling someone to please wear a mask... Glad I don't live in the US
81 likes@ciaoneef keep watching the bbc and cnn..
10 likes@David Cisneros even then I can’t get behind cops killing people for handicap spots either wtf lmao I mean yeah it’s rude and inconsiderate but murder is a whole ass other ballgame
25 likes@Ryan Laprade I don't watch either but nice try. Keep watching Fox & OAN :)
17 likes@Ainsley Oliver and so it’s okay to shoot someone over a handicapped spot?
8 likes@Chris M it was after he was physically assaulted.
3 likes@Glen Forde no it wasn't dummy.
5 likes@Wize Wolf yes it was TARD wolf.
4 likes@Wize Wolf Whether you believe Michaels story about thinking his life was in danger or not, that doesn't take away the fact that the victim pushed him to the ground. From the footage it did look like the victim was going to give him a beating, but thats just speculation of course, but people do die from getting struck/kicked to the head, so its possible to believe he was scared for his life. The biggest problem with this case, and why Michael deserved his prison sentence i feel is that he didn't even consider the fact of just brandishing his firearm, it looked like his intension was to shoot right away. From the footage we can see the victim is retreating backwards when the firearm was brandished, and the situation should have ended there. I don't personally believe the guy was aiming to kill that person, he shot once and holstered his weapon to wait for police etc. Still though, in this circumstance it was very pre-emptive when you look how he was retreating, and michael lying about the fact and saying he was coming towards him after brandishing.
7 likesThe fact that it took paramedics 19 minutes to get there is also insane, i suspect that perhaps it took a while before they where called to the scene, cause that response time was really out of this world. With the 1 gsw and a quick response the victims chances would be much better i think, but you never know.
After watching the video it feels like Michael purposefully wanted to shoot the guy once to dominate the situation, probably some revenge in there as well for pushing him to the ground. There are alot of things that could have been done differently to not instigate a fight or even worse the murder. The victim could obviously have had a verbal confrontation back like Michael was doing, and Michael could obviously have stopped and controlled the situation after just brandishing his firearm, there was no need for him to shoot.
@Ainsley Oliver lmfaoooo bro this aint the place to be clowning around
5 likes@ciaoneef Where do you live? In the US, these incidents are pretty rare, and aren't a concern to the average person. That being said, my part of the country is very safe.
0 likes@Ainsley Oliver by killing them over it? No
1 like@ARCHITACADEMY I live in The Netherlands, basically only organized crime people have guns here. (Ironically an investigative journalist was actually just shot in broad daylight 2 days ago, but that's super rare.) If I lived in a concealed carry state in the US I'd be scared to get into arguments with people, might just get shwacked for pissing off the wrong old white guy
6 likesWhat ? Why ? Does people searching for starting arguments and love to bring a weapon to shooting people..for a parking spot ???
4 likesCrazy people !!!
Provokes a confrontation over parking in a handicap spot, WHILE PARKING ILLEGALLY HIMSELF .... height of irony
5 likes@Joel McKnight If the intent is murder then I agree but firing ONE well-placed bullet at center mass is solely meant to stop/neutralize further forward progress and likely bodily harm. Had Drejka wanted to kill McGlockton he would've emptied the clip. He demonstrated tremendous control and restraint despite being dazed from the violent push to the ground.
1 like@Sabrason I had a feeling you were trolling, glad i didnt bite lol
4 likes@Joel McKnight "Trolling" = TRUTH
1 like@Unikatze Only cops should have guns, right? Because they are so much more important and responsible
1 likeI dont understand how one is wired to start shit over a parking spot. Those people convince me democracy is actually a shitty idea.
2 likes@Seek Wisdom Funny thing is, that's how it works everywhere else in the world. And yet, you guys in the US are the ones with the most police violence.
5 likesSo how is it helping exactly that everyone is allowed to carry a gun?
Oh right, police are more paranoid, hence why they are more trigger happy than everywhere else.
What about real Parking wardens? 😨
0 likes@piippiz placed behind sandbags, armed with m60's and mortars 😂 cause Merica!
0 likes@Unikatze I wont discuss with you
0 likes@Wize Wolf You're misrepresenting my reply. I'm not justifying what he did, and i already said he deserved to go to prison for a long time because of what he did. I was merely presenting the facts of the video as i saw them. Which is there was more than 1 person who could have changed the outcome of the situation. From my perspective the victim was never in the wrong here, even when i dont agree with his first action being physical, i never said it was wrong either.
1 likeThe focus of this video is to analyze the situation, not jump to emotional conclusions. This is only speculation of course, if push came to shove i would probably have pushed the guy as well. Hopefully not as a first response, i would hope that i'd have the capacity to try and de-escalate the situation verbally first. If that wouldn't work i'd have to either get physical or enter the car and drive away.
The only point i was trying to get across is we should very rarely turn to violence as a first response.
@Ainsley Oliver if you kill to make sure that doesnt happen then your moral high ground comes crashing down.
0 likes@ciaoneef good god i know. Im way to european to understand some of these people that think shooting means back off.
1 like@Ainsley Oliver while that may be true, i’m failing to see where anyone has the right to take another human beings life over a parking spot. smfh if he cared about doing the right thing he would have taken pictures and reported it, he’s a man on a power trip looking to defend “his” store. pathetic that people are even defending that where is the humanity.
1 likePeople need to mind their mf business, they’re acting like they’re getting paid for the bs. Off duty parking lot warrior.
1 like@Wize Wolf well written. Thank you.
1 like@Chris M Well at least they'd be parked in the right spot then
0 likes@Ainsley Oliver 😂 your kidding right? If he minded his own business then this wouldn't have happened he started and he is a wimp with a gun that just murdered someone because they shoved I'm on his arse for talking to their missus the way he was. He deserves to rot in jail forever. You justify his actions because he was "making sure someone wasn't taking advantage of our disabled parks" 😂😂🤦 you can't be that dull. Maybe live your life instead of thinking your above the law.
1 likeGot the nerve to park in the handicap and then shove me out of no where. Yea he getting shot unless he was running back!
0 likes@almightyorange 19 minutes is light fast bro, where i live its minimum 30 minutes, and it can arrive in more than 1 hour, yes i live in South America
1 like@Ainsley Oliver no it isn’t bigot
0 likes@el colito for sure if compared to several areas 19 minutes is fast. when it comes to people that are critically wounded though 19 minutes might be too long. I believe in the U.S they aim for a 5-7 minute response time for the ambulance to get there, and a 20 second response time on the call itself. When it comes to critical situations like these, it gets very difficult to save them if they are not treated by professionals immediately.
0 likes@almightyorange in argentina, fast is less than 1:30 hours, no seas pete
1 likeIf he had just done nothing, or even just drawn his weapon but not fired, he could have sued the guy and lived happily ever after. But he wanted to shoot somebody, so that’s what he did.
117 likesReplies (5)
Mr. Strawmann sure the guy for what lol
0 likes@Jedidja B Likely assault, he did shove the guy to the ground.
13 likesMr. Strawmann my guess is he was embarrassed that he got pushed down so he was after retribution
3 likesI don't see it as he could have sued as to my mind he left this victim to feel the need to protect his family and create a safe space away from his family in that car. This wasn't even a reason for him to take it upon himself to play parking cop. The employee of the store could have been the one to deal with that if need be. It's just a ridiculous reason to confront anyone over this, at least up until they see a person needing that space and unable to do so. Senseless.. So many lives forever changed over stupid self inflated ego trips.
1 likeIt's against the law in FL to pull a gun out or fire a warning shot to "scare" your attacker off. If you pull it out you better be in real danger and ready to pull the trigger.
0 likesNEVER PUT YOUR HANDS ON ANOTHER PERSON
5 likesReplies (1)
Not his first rodeo. Imagine the guy’s surprise when the fella pulled a gun out
3 likeslawyer!
0 likesIf anyone wants an update : He was sentenced to 20 years in jail.
598 likesHe was also assaulted in prison by another inmate because of what he did.
Replies (45)
Did he pull a gun on the other inmate?
68 likes@The Galactic Emperor haha no. But the inmate hit him with a padlock inside of a sock. He required several stitches afterwards.
97 likesHow do you know this I'm impressed your able to keep tabs on people. How u do that lol also u look cute in ur pfp. Lol chill just compliments 🐱 🔥
9 likesAhh ok thank you for the update! onto the next vid/case 🙂
2 likes@Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Haha thanks, I guess =P
0 likesGood.
0 likesHope he gets more padlock treatments
32 likes@Jared Price wonderful to here!
1 likeDid we all forget he was assaulted? People steal houses and get shot and that’s justified
5 likesHow do y’all know ?
0 likes@Cleborp IMO defending private property isn't justification to kill someone, you can get your TV back but that person can never get their life back. Likewise getting pushed to the ground isn't good enough reason to shoot someone. It really wasn't like his life was in danger here over a small altercation, he had no reason to fire.
11 likes@Cogs of Cogitation some laws you can kill if they are robbing. He still got assaulted, I think a scared 50 year old who didn’t mean to go for the kill shot didn’t deserve 20 years . Yes still killed even though the guy was backing away but still
3 likes@Cleborp You're high dude. The guy had used his gun multiple times as a leverage in heated arguments. The guy was fucking power tripping. A guy like that is not safe to have out on the streets at all. He shot to kill, not shot to defend.
17 likes@Cleborp I think the whole problem is that he actually wanted to go for the kill shot. He opened carried for years, probably just waiting for the golden opportunity. But the biggest point of all was that he initiated the whole altercation. You don’t go harassing a woman out in public and not expect her husband to defend her. I’d understand better if they were the ones harassing him, but still, even then it’s not justified. No one in their right mind would feel like their life is in serious danger at that point. They’re in public and the man is visibly unarmed.
11 likes@Jared Price disagree with some of your points. Ya he approached but at a safe distance and technically they shouldn’t have parked there, then he gets assaulted . Again the question is if he wanted the kill shot or not
0 likes@Cleborp Stand your ground laws are highly contentious and limited to certain states. Once more being scared doesn't make it suddenly okay to shoot an unarmed person, the level of violence he used was far greater than what was necessary. He didn't even give a warning shot first, he went straight for the center of mass, with a full 2 seconds to evualate things. The guy wanted to take out his anger, not to defend himself.
5 likes@Crystal Nobles That's fair, but would you shoot the person if they started to leave the house? Would you fire a warning shot? If you were alone would you try to leave the house before resorting to a possible kill scenario? Ultimately this isn't really about stand your ground laws anyways, it's just about at what point is it okay to kill someone? In this video's scenario, assault shouldn't be a basis for killing.
1 like@Cogs of Cogitation so you’re 50 year old grandpa gets shoved to the ground would you think it’s ok if he shot to defend himself he was probably scared and dazed . Adrenaline pumping
1 likeHe deserves more than 20 years 🤷🏻♀️
4 likes@Aryn ❤︎ nah he got assaulted
3 likes@Cleborp smh
2 likes@Aryn ❤︎ same here
1 like@Cleborp how does one shoot someone in the chest and “not mean to go for a kill shot”
3 likes@Lewis a lot survive from the chest
0 likes@Aryn ❤︎ big head to shake
0 likes@cleborp take a ccw class learn something
1 like@Andrew Lopez just saying it was self defense. Killing was unnecessary
0 likesHey everyone don’t trip. @cleborp is the type to start a fight, get beat up and call the cops. Or start a fight in hopes too use his firearm. He is set in his logic. For now
2 likes@Jahi Gibbs I think you all have trouble with what the law is. If I argue and someone hits me then yes they will be breaking the law.
0 likesI’m glad
0 likesThats called a force multiplier
0 likes@FFS baggebo for a 50 year old man getting his ass knocked to the ground? The gun was necessary, killing was not
0 likes@Fancy Pants more pad dock treatment.
0 likes@Cleborp lot's don't..
0 likes@Cleborp if my 50 year old grandpa was being a jackass, aggressively harassing (it stated at the start of the video that there was a loud argument) a lone woman (as far as he knew at that point) for parking in a disabled spot without a permit, when there are clearly other places to park too, then yeah I wouldn't be surprised if her husband stepped up on him!
2 likesHe also didn't engage in an argument with the male, he drew the power he'd bought himself on his hip, and fired without warning or clarifying the situation. He instigated the confrontation knowing he had a trump card on his hip. A man lost his life, a woman her husband and kids their dad because someone was a bit upset that a disabled parking spot was taken and a male Karen with a side arm took the law into his own hands. Ridiculous.
He could have reported the unauthorized parking to staff inside, or called the authorities himself. Instead he took responsibility because he knew he could end an altercation immediately and behaved irresponsibly. I'm writing this 32 mins in. It'd be interesting to know if he knew what the outcome would be at the end, when he first started his beef regarding the lack of a placard, whether he would still have started that argument. I'm going to assume he would and still be proud of it
@Cleborp troll 😂
0 likes@Cleborp you’re the one that said he ( the shooter) could have had adrenaline pumping. Justifying it. But I’m in no mood to go back and forth with stupid. Have a good one
0 likesThanks for the update!
0 likesperfect, and even should got more time
0 likes@Cleborp he was harassing them well before he got pushed down. it was a push as well and the man had no weapon, yet he shot the man dead in front of his wife and kid. how the hell are you gonna say that’s justified? it’s not self defense if you threatened them first.
0 likes@Cleborp How do you steal a house?
0 likes@Cleborp What's confusing you here. I responding to your comment. You wrote "People steal houses blah blah blah." I'm asking what you're talking about? How would anyone steal a house?
0 likes@pineapple do you know what assault is
0 likes@Cleborp
0 likesDo you know what murder is? Both happened, but by no means does a light shove justfiy getting shot
@Cleborp
0 likesHe’s not my grandfather and my grandfather is not stupid enough to threaten a 20-30 some year old man’s family for a property he doesn’t own. If he gets pushed, I’ll feel sorry for him, but he got what was coming. Which was literally just a push.
He got pushed not hit, all on camera
1 likeThis is a great lesson to anyone that carries. Don't be like this guy.
159 likesReplies (7)
Facts
3 likes@VixenTheFox What bold words you have to say about Americans, I wonder what nation you are from but however let's give you a history lesson, before we proceed answer the simple question why does the US have the second amendment?
13 likesVixenthefox The vast majority of people that get killed by guns here is by illegal gun owners. Nobody here is like this guy. And when a government tries to take your freedom away, our weapons is how we provent it. Western world? Lol almost every modern western society has some sort of gun laws allowing ownership legally except south america and man thats where illegal guns and murder rule. So what are you talking about?
5 likesI'm 110% for the 2nd amendment, I have 7 guns and working on getting another.. But people like this is what makes me worry about armed citizens going out like what happened in Kenosha (not here to argue whether or not it was justified.) My point is there are a lot of unstable people out there that have guns and that may not be an issue if they're just hunters but once they start putting on ballistic vests and patrolling like they're in Iraq, some bad shit is bound to ensue. I'm afraid we'll start seeing a lot more shootings related to armed citizens walking around if something doesn't change in our country on both sides of the problem.
2 likes@Jocco Second amendment is not for hunting
2 likesMost men would shove someone to the ground for berating their wife and kids. true story.
1 like@Keith Then that'd definitely land you assault and battery charges. If beating is involved then it's likely to go into the aggravated assault category.
1 likeI was praying he won't ask for a lawyer. Like a good soldier he (imagines he) is, he didn't let me down.
132 likesReplies (1)
Haha, I will admit, these videos motivate me to ALWAYS get a Lawyer!😂
0 likesWow, that man recovered from his injuries right on camera. Amazing
38 likesMichael gets pushed : "So there I was on the battlefield..."
4969 likesReplies (40)
LOL I cant 😂
44 likesThe ptsd of the time he tripped over a pebble kicked in lol
157 likesLOLL
3 likes@Kember Walkin no you
21 likes@Kember Walkin I dont need to 😙
9 likes@Kember Walkin why did I think you were a girl? I was trying to do the whole woman empowerment thing
35 likes@Kember Walkin thank you for keeping YouTube comment sections unsafe
59 likes@Erik Uden 😂
5 likes@aniBlush no, it's really just sad.
18 likesExactly... 😬😄
0 likesYou got a pretty mouth
3 likes@Kember Walkin :(
2 likesExactly
0 likes@Dre Flacko smh. why are you simping in chat on a murder interrogation breakdown video.
16 likes🤣🤣🤣🤣
1 likewoman complimenting strangers is sweet and wholesome, but men complementing strangers is pervy and simping. I'm not even disagreeing, I just find it odd. we truly do live in a society. lol
4 likes@The Man With No Name I completely agree. Society gives free passes to women where a man would not get one. But I wouldnt compare this situation to that.
6 likesLMFAOOO
0 likesHere for the comments 😂 🍿
5 likes@Lisa W this is exactly that. When you thought he was a woman, you thought it was sweet and wholesome. But when you realize it was a man, suddenly everyone started attacking him. Like I said before, I feel the same way, men complimenting strangers online (especially women) is creepy and weird. But nothing changed with his statements, they're the same posts as before, but now that you know they're from a man, it's simp shit. lol
2 likes@The Man With No Name It was sweet and wholesome whether it came from a man or woman. But I backed off after he put his instagram up there. A compliment is absolutely fine and I appreciated it, but trying to take it outside of youtube is where I backed out, that applies to females as well.
10 likes@Lisa W aight that's fair. It just seemed like it was the realization that it was a man that suddenly made everyone attack him.
3 likes@Dre Flacko did you delete your insta?
1 like@Dre Flacko incel
2 likes@The Man With No Name well it’s not really odd if you think about it...most of the time when men do that it does come off as creepy with weird intentions however it can come from both men and women
0 likes@Lisa W f
0 likes@moe lestor coward 🤨
0 likesA push from a grown man on pavement can easily end up with someone dead. This isn't kids on a playground, two adult men putting hands on each other can get deadly real quick. That's why you don't want to get into situations like this. Bad decisions all around.
3 likesAnyway I just started blasting
1 likelmaoo
0 likesHaha! 😂
0 likes😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
1 likeWhy is nobody mentioning the fact that the victim parked in a handicap spot?
3 likesListen, I'm not justifying him being shot but I hate arrogant people who just think they can do anything they want - with an "IDGAF" attitude, such as parking in a disabled parking spot when they're not disabled. These types of people are scumbags.
He did not deserve to be shot over this but unfortunately, he crossed somebody who was a little more arrogant than him that day and paid the consequences.
Sorry but both the suspect and the victim can kiss my *
@pistol pete he also illegally parked.
0 likesSo anyway, I started blasting
1 like@Duo chill lmao
0 likes@The Man With No Name The problem, how did they assume it was a man, in the first place? was it via his actions which associated with how men like “them” act, since the commenter is ambiguous.
0 likes🤣💀🤣
0 likes😂
0 likes@dre.flacko I'm uncomfortable with the energy in the reply section
0 likeswhy does this guy’s lawyer sound like he’s giving a middle school persuasive essay presentation rather than a closing statement thing
1349 likesReplies (12)
Because he's trying so hard to find any small proof of his innocence. So he's nitpicking every small detail he can find.
61 likesBecause he's incompetent. There are a dozen times during that prosecutor's monologue on "Beyond a reasonable doubt" that any reasonable lawyer would have objected to. That man was misrepresenting a fundamental piece of our legal system and nobody called him on it.
25 likesThe Evidence and Drejka's own testimony make a brutal case against him on their own, especially on the relatively low bar that is the charge of manslaughter.
14 likesThe only hope Drejka had was to desperately pull on the jurors heartstrings, so that's what defense did.
1
1 like@MJubeily other dude sounds like ben shapiro
4 likesminimum effort on defending a criminal
0 likesBecause it's not TV or a movie.
1 like@Sabrason Michael is that you?
3 likes“So in conclusion, my guy was literally the good guy and the other guy was literally the bad guy, no cap.”
4 likesHe is the worst lawyer I've seen. I'm glad though.
1 likeHis manner of speaking is just like Donald trump’s.
3 likesI think its because the guy who shot alrewdy ruined it for himself in the interogation and the lawyer was grasping for any small thing that could help
0 likes"Did you serve?"
2096 likes"Affirmative, officer. 12 years, hallway monitor."
Replies (11)
😂😂😂
13 likesAll the 'affirmative' and 'negative, sir' he said was so cringe knowing he doesn't even come from that background. He's probably one of those dudes who wears tacticool gear to go target shooting in the woods.
170 likes🤣🤣🤣
1 like@Aura1337 you’re talking about Dwight lol
2 likes😂
1 likeLater to parking monitor
4 likes😂
0 likesI missed that
0 likesLove your Ralph profile pic! 😉
1 like🤣🤣🤣
0 likes🤣
0 likesBulls it I bet the guy who it shot was a criminal
1 likeDon't assault people. Also don't agree with confrontation when not necessary. Pointless. Call the cops if you're concerned. An unjustified shooting though. Could've drawn and ordered him back but it's easy to play back seat quarterback. Get trained if you're going to carry, have Legal Shield and don't say a word until your attorney is present. Your bias is showing.
0 likesReplies (1)
Legal Shield? LOL 😆
0 likesDead giveaway when he says "i was trying to neutralize" - not only is he adopting police jargon to seem at kin with the cops, this statement in itself obviates the fact that he did not see the level of force necessary to avoid serious harm as equivalent to the use of a deadly force.. he has dug his own grave with that statement.
30 likesReplies (1)
Billie Posters yup
0 likesDon't like the prosecutors example, thunder smell of rain and lightning, then you wake up to water everywhere means rain. If I wake up and there is water everywhere, I'm going to immediately assume that a water pipe broke in my house, since I don't sleep outside. Fire pit out by helicopter with bucket meaning no sun tomorrow? Depends on how bad the fire is and the forecast for the weather. Awful examples. Doesn't mean I think defendant is innocent, just the prosecutor didn't drive his examples the way he thinks he did.
0 likesI personally think that he delusion himself into thinking that it was a self-defense. At that moment, the victim was probably the first one to actually "engage" a fight while he's carrying a gun. When he was pushed and felt threatened he probably have the thought "oh I was pushed and if I don't do something he will try more than that". He pulled his gun out and the victim move away, he registered that hence he hesitated but his reasoning made him think of "Its fine to shoot him now because it's self-defense" and that is most likely because he had fantasize or dream of the moment where he can finally use his gun. As it was said that he did like waving his gun around.
74 likesHe was consumed by his delusion that he fired the gun thinking that he can escape the consequences as he believed of it as self-defense.. But then again, it was just my opinion.
Replies (1)
I think this kinda makes sense if you consider two things:
6 likesFirst, It’s hard to find good ccw self defense shooting statistics, BUT I’ve heard that an average number of rounds fired is between 5-6 in an citizen shooting.
Second, he fired only once.
When he thought about it he fired his first shot because like you said he thought he could blow some poor guy who was mad about his lady getting harassed then realized he probably shouldn’t have shot him and didn’t fire a second shot. A big thing for ccw consideration is how many rounds were fired and how “necessary” rounds were fired to essentially save you from whatever threat. Say an individual runs away or drives away after trying to car jack you and you keep shooting as they drive down the street the police are gonna be pretty upset about that. Knowing this, he probably shouldn’t have shot that man and that he wasn’t in any real danger he only fired once and instantly regretted it instead of trying to fire off more rounds.
This is so painful to watch. This guy thinks his actions are 100% justified. Clearly a little prejudice mixed with a long term hero complex.
36 likesReplies (3)
id say the prejudiced was justified considering the guy immediately pushed him to the ground with out saying a word.
0 likes@Toob247 Toob247
1 likeHere's a bright idea: What if he just walked away. When the wife asked him why it was his business, walk away. When she got out of the car, walk away. When someone pushed him but backed up as soon as he pulled out the gun, walk away. This wasn't an inevitable situation and he was the instigator.
His actions were 100% justified.
0 likesDude was acting like he was a rockstar being interviewed
2335 likesReplies (17)
That was the moment of his life.
72 likesHe's famous, now.
I bet the cops loved how much of a talker he was.
77 likesliked it then took it back to keep it at an excellent number
0 likes@Rene Silva Was it 666
0 likes@Connor Jones nah 420 someone ruined it
1 likeHe is a hero
1 like@Rene Silva It was I...and I'll do it again, too.
1 like@casual listener You say what the media tells you and shows you
1 likeSky, he didn't think he did anything wrong. He thought that because he had a gun permit, it was his store, he could do what he liked.
5 likesHe was looking for an argument, not just this time, but 4 other times.
@Niebo even if, hypothetically, it was a justified self defense shooting, he is far from a hero. Even if it is a justified self defense shooting, he is a slow in the brain coward for shooting a man FATALLY, who was not a threat after pushing him down.
1 like@Hunter Nichols The coward are the one who pushed him. Pretending to be disabled parked on site for people with disabilities. He got a bullet for being a dodger. A dozen years ago they would have considered it self-defense but now the law is strong for the weak and weak for the strong.
0 likes@Niebo No one is gonna feed that, but nice try mate
3 likes@zaer ezartzt just don't cry
0 likes@pain uchiha english is not my national language
0 likes@Niebo I have to say HOLY SHIT he looks and sounds like a white supremacist when he's in prison 37:00
0 likesI mean the cops already had to be called on him in 4 separate road rage incidents in 10 years, 3 allegedly involving the guns he claimed to always carry with him since he was 22. Also: “Two involved allegations of Drejka showing a gun. In another, a trooper accused him of aggressive driving and cited him after a crash when Drejka braked hard in front of a woman driving with two children.”
2 likes😂😂😂😂
0 likesHe was so crushed when the detectives told him they didn't know what "force multiplier" was. Lmao he was sooo sure he knew the cop lingo.
71 likesReplies (1)
The shooter got that phrase from the YouTube channel “Active Self Protection”.
3 likesif he didn't put hands on him... he wouldn't of got shot.
1 likeyou couldn't shoot his leg?
0 likesReplies (1)
His actions weren't justified but if you ever draw a weapon you train to shoot center mass, which is why you should NEVER draw unless you intend to kill. Shooting in the leg is movie b.s.
0 likesDrejka: "He took a step towards me, so I fired"
1625 likesCCTV: clearly shows victim backing off when Drejka draws his gun
Replies (86)
He wanted to shoot someone so bad. Every day, he was just waiting for an opportunity.
149 likes@Adrian Gorus yeah pushing someone over like that... I mean getting shot is not something you should expect but imagine if the guy was an off-duty cop. That's an arrest for assault. The victim was not very bright either. I've seen a person get pushed over like that, hitting their head on the concrete and going to coma (this was at school and it was way less powerful push). I had concussion from similar event, but I was drunk and got pushed for seemingly hitting on someone else's girl. My sister had her collarbone broken from being pushed like that. Like serious injuries can happen from being pushed over... yet he went out and with no context yeets the guy. I am niot justifying Drejka, just saying that both sides over-reacted to the situation.
46 likes@Adrian Gorus So, he should have just let the dude harass his girlfriend and kids while taking pictures of their car? He was clearly the instigator. Can't really avoid being shot by him when he's the one pointlessly starting it, expecting you to just stand there and take it.
79 likes@Soleilune he couldve stepped in like a normal human being and not start assaulting people🙃 as civilized people we should talk and not shove/hit... and tbh i didnt see him taking pictures either
36 likes@Adrian Gorus How about listening to what he himself admitted to in the video. 😂😂😂
47 likesHe was taking pictures of the car, buddy.
@Soleilune how about you listen to it... he says that is what he usually does with people who park on a reserved parking spot... look at the surveillance it literally shows how he walks around and then proceeds to argue when he gets hit
5 likes@Adrian Gorus The guy went to prison like he deserved. Cry about it.
43 likes@No Name im not saying that he doesn’t deserve it because he definitely does but the guy that got shot was about as stupid as he was... imo both were at fault big time and the one who did it got rightously punished
19 likes@TheVanBourner thats what i meaan. Im Not glorifying the shooter but jesus christ why provocate a fight by instantly escalating to violence. Its called being civilized about something and that dude surely wasnt
12 likes@No Name he got shot for assaulting him... why do you guys magically forget that it was escalated by the guy who got shot... like cmon i know you can think of an better argument
7 likes@No Name and btw im not saying the shooter was innocent because he definitely was not in imminent danger ANYMORE but the guy who got shot definitely escalated it to a level of physical violence and he was not a hero protecting his gf and kids like you depict him as.
8 likesthey manipulated the video. FYI He was justified in his head, as he thought he was coming back, as did i when i first watched the video. It was only when i re watched it, in slow motion, i see what we all see. this is sad, but how our minds work, again, he was not lying, its what he really believes and saw, and in the splits second, so will you in that situation. MAKE AN EXPERIEMNT, WITH A FAKE GUN, AND KEEP GETTING RANDOM PEOPLE WITH A FAKE ATTCKER, AND SEE WHO PULLS TRIGGER, AND WHAT THE VIDEO SHOWS, TO THERE TESTIMONY, BEFORE WATCHING IT. I BET YOU WIL NOT LIKE THE RESULTS. THIS MAN SHOULD GET TIMED SERVED, AND MUCH NEED THEROPY. HE WA VIOLENTLY PUSHED AND ATTCKED TO THE GROUND WITH MANY MORE VERBEL THRATS OF HARM, HE IS THE VICTIM AND STILL IS.
5 likes@No Name i literally said twice that i dont justify what the shooter did... but im saying the guy who shoved him was also at fault because no shoving people out of the blue is not justified... violence is not the solution to a verbal argument.
6 likes@Adrian Gorus It wasn't out of the blue, bro. The guy was literally yelling at the top of his lungs towards his gf and kids. Like, this is VERY obvious.
24 likes@No Name and the guy who got shot is at fault because he escalated it and gave the shooter a possibility or rather an opportunity to use his power where the shooter thinks he is justified to shoot so he does. If the shooter is scared of consequences he wouldnt do it but in his mind he just got assaulted which he did and saw the chance to shoot him so he did
4 likes@No Name ??? Idk man you seem kinda obnoxious... the guy came up behind him and shoved him pretty hard without any declaration of intent or something... and also since when can you see sound because idk bout you but i feel like the video does not seem to have audio
4 likes@Adrian Gorus Lol... Dude... It was literally IN the video that he was yelling very loud for over a minute, to the point that it could be heard from the inside of the store... Stop being intentionally ignorant
21 likes@No Name im confused... why was the black family in the handicapped spot?
2 likes@Jack _ Clearly, it must just be because they're black, right? That's the reason you want it to be, I'm guessing.
14 likesThe suspect. Not the victim, the suspect died that day and the victim was protecting himself
1 likeIt's very different to see that CCTV in slowmotion versus in realtime after you got hit by a truck.
0 likes@No Name no it was stated that they were yelling at each other. No one knows for sure who of them started the yelling.
0 likes@No Name Look I understand your point but just because he is the victim doesn't mean what he did was the right thing. Noone should shove anyone into the ground. Adrian is right on that point. I don't know why you get so worked up on a comment that is common sense. The killer def deserves for what he did, but the victim also shouldn't have retaliated in violent manner unless he was being physically threatened which he wasn't.
3 likes@Adrian Gorus I would just ingore this No Name dude. It's one of those people that doesn't see things from multiple perspectives. If someone dies, I guess that person to him/her was a pure angel that didn't do anything wrong.
2 likes@Douglas Moore Disparity of force. Using lethal force to protect oneself from an attacker that fails to display ability, opportunity, and intent to inflict death or grave bodily injury, is a no no.
3 likes@Adrian Gorus I agree this No Name guy does not understanding what you're saying at all. You may as well be speaking to a wall. Everybody in this situation is an idiot. Doesn't mean the guy deserved to die, literally noone said that.
0 likes@Bojidar Stanchev I didn't say that shooting is the correct response. I said that pushing someone over like that is also over-reaction and needlessly escalates situation. Simple as that.
0 likeshe wanted revenge because he got shoved and was unprepared to defend himself otherwise. he didn't have instincts and self defense skills, just the ability to harass. he was overly obnoxious in the first place (actual police officers will start out polite and don't become defensive unless they suspect bodily threat-and yes they might overreact because they are trained to protect themselves and other officers' lives as a priority. they become irate, aggressive as well to intimidate someone who is a possible life threat). he might not have gotten shoved so hard. he thought it commendable he cared she was in that spot without a placard. he ended up doing something far worse. the father and child planned to be in there just a few minutes. if a disabled person needed the space, she would have been able to accommodate them right away.
3 likes@E its not a no no, if the guy was defending himself. The guy shouldnt of walked up to the car, but he did, the black guy shouldnt of pushed him on the ground, but he did. Drejka wasnt attacking the car or the women inside so there was no reason for the black guy to get physically agressive. Drejka made a split second decision to save his life, in the heat of the moment i think everyone wouldnt done what Drejka did. And Drejka only dischared his weapon once, after the attacker was "neutralized", Drejka had no reason to shoot again. Most people wouldve shot multiple times until the attacker fell to the ground
2 likes@virginia exactly, the victim has a family. His wife and children were all in the car and a man just popped out nowhere and suddenly started yelling at them, ofcourse you're instinct is to protect them. I dont get why they keep saying that the shoving was uncalled for, clearly they dont understand what it means to have a family of their own. The other guy should've just punch or matched the victim's intial response but since this other guy has always been assertive on every chance he gets to use his gun, coz this gun violence already happened 4 times prior to this. He also admitted that when approached the vehicle he knows there could probably an altercation but he was prideful coz he had his stupid gun.
1 like@Soleilune there's a significant number of the population that fantasizes about "legally" murdering people. Thrills of the murder, but none of the consequences of it. Whatever it be jail or live as a fugitive, none of that and just remain living a middle-class life. After murdering someone, plus being treated a hero for that.
0 likes@Jaja Raguini Physically assaulting someone over a verbal altercation is the definition of uncalled for. You don’t do that shit. Be mature about things and actively seek to de escalate.
1 like@TheVanBourner but Drejka went way across the line yes the altercation should not have gotten to that point but drejka shot someone who was walking away. My grammar sucks so just bear with me.
1 like@Soleilune it doesn’t matter who started it or who the two people were, unless the actions in the past directly correlate to the current case, all that matters is that Drejka shot someone who was walking away and clearly was not reaching for a gun.
0 likes@ShietCard and I am not disputing that. My point is that Markeis' reaction was also over the top. But Markeis did not go ahead to kick the shit out of Drejka, he backed off when he saw himself that he may have hurt the man and situation is already in his eyes defused. Drejka on the other hand pulled out the gun when the situation was already defused and ended up shooting.
1 likeThere's a clear line I am drawing - I am not defending Drejka. I am just saying that Markeis' reaction to the situation was wrong. It's the perfect example of two wrongs not making right. Both reacted wrong to the situation, except Drejka's "force multiplier" multiplied his wrong reaction above and beyond where it was necessary. That's why his actions that he deemed a self-defense are not valid. But I am pretty sure the situation would have ended up differently if instead of sucker punching a skin and bone piece of shit he initiated with "man get the fuck outta here" . Drejka was bound to kill someone with his demeanor and history of threatening people with his gun. But Markeis' actions were not justified either. If (and that is a big IF) Drejka had no intend on using his gun or had none - Markeis would be charged with assault. He'd go to jail and have legal trouble for what? Over-reacting to his wife being told not to park in handicapped spot?
My point is the situation was being defused by violence despite not needing any violence to be defused at all (by both parties). It was verbal altrecation that was escalated by Markeis and from Markeis' PoV defused at the same time. From Drejka's PoV he felt like his training at Gravy Seals finally paid off. He could have just holstered the weapon after Markeis took three steps back. There was enough time even for a person in shock to make that decision. For a person that is not ready or willing to kill that is. The correct course of action Drejka should have made would be to get up after noticing Markeis backed off, call the police and describe that he was just assaulted. That's what any reasonable person with pet peeves about handicapped signs would really do in the situation after the attacker is going back when "force multiplier" is introduced (in fact Markeis seems to be pulling back even before a gun is shown at all).
I am not fine with people shooting others for whatever reason. But are you seriously all fine with people pushing others like that? What if instead of Drejka there was an off-duty cop? What if after being pushed he splits his head open and gets internal bleeding to brain? Like you can get some serious injuries from being pushed over like that. Do you guys seriously consider Markeis' reaction to be justified? Is "defending your wife" who is clearly in the wrong (I mean why even park in handicapped spot especially when there are bunch of other spots next to it) and barely verbally attacked justifiable for you to make the move and push someone from behind? In my eyes Markeis' action was wrong. Not on the same level as Drejka's or anywhere near it. But still wrong. Drejka seems like the kind of guy that if a guy couple inches and few dozen pounds of muscle larger than him tells him "get fucked loser" that truly shits himself. But Markeis gave him his fantasy on a silver platter. He wanted to kill someone for a long time, it can be seen from the interview that he himself was in the "finally I could 'defend' myself" fantasy. If Drejka was kicking the car or posed any obvious physical danger towards Markeis' wife and children before the gun was pulled then I would say yep, Markeis' action to sucker punch him was justified and on the level of the threat. But it wasn't.
He was the victim, dummy.
0 likes@Adrian Gorus why should the victim be the one to be “civilized?” Was the murderer civilized when he was harassing the victim’s family? NO! So he did what he had to do to defend his family. If you say he should’ve been the bigger person and talked calmly to a stranger YELLING to a woman and her kids then you should REALLY take a step back and rethink if that approach is based on your privilege as a white person, or just one that lacks critical thinking skills.
0 likes@jeremy ok ok so you just assumed my race mister... but besides that kinda racist thing i just wanna let you know that you should read before crying around because if you did then you would know that i am not justifying the shooter but im saying that the „victim“ is also at fault big time for escalating e verbal argument to a physical one... i dont know why you are so keen on glorifying anyone who gets shot
0 likes@Douglas Moore At the point Drejka fired, his life was not in jeopardy as his assailant was backing away and was unarmed and made no sort of verbal threat.
0 likes@TheVanBourner you never drew a clear line you only said that both the reactions were over the top
0 likes@TheVanBourner the other stuff you said in the response was just added on later to better support a loose statement
0 likesSorry, that logic with someone taking back 0,5 or 2 steps shouldn't be takien into considaration. He is probably getting distance to hit/kick you with more force, run towards you to stomp on you, or there is something in the distance that can be used as a weapon against you. Pushing someone on the ground means that that person takes into account other hitting his head or breaking something. I would immiedietly treat this as an assault on my person.
0 likes@Soleilune
0 likes"So, he should have just let the dude harass his girlfriend and kids while taking pictures of their car?" So his girlfriend should park in handicapped place, and he shouldn't take pictures for police, to not offend their feelings?
She was clearly the instigator (assuming her idea, not her partners). And this argument was going on for a while, without any sign of her moving the esteemed car.
@Soleilune "He was taking pictures of the car, buddy." As he should have as a proof for police.
0 likes@Adrian Gorus THAT is how a normal human would behave. If I walk into a situation where my wife and children are being threatened by a stranger, I am taking defensive measures. That's the thing; the victim had the right to the self-defense defense as he had reason to believe he or his family were in danger of serious bodily harm or death. If you walked out of a store to see a stranger behaving erratically and threatening towards your family, why would you not believe they were in danger?
2 likes@Jooyeon Kim why is it that the only people entitled to the self-defense defense in your mind are the ones that succeed in killing the other person?
0 likes@James Franksain mabe because the gf/partner had the balls to open the door and try to step out idk didnt seem that hostile. And idk bout you but i feel like the part with the threat is an assumption on your side
0 likes@Adrian Gorus an assumption? It's a statement. Any reasonable person would have reason to believe the threat exists and, as the tragedy that followed indicates, they were correct in that belief. This situation just shows that, if you believe your life or the lives of your loved ones is imperiled and you are in the assailant's blindspot, don't shove; disable them and eliminate them as a threat because you never know how far the assailant is willing to go.
0 likesMan I'm just ~39% drunk, maybe more than I was ever before, I don't drink a lot, just once a month vine as I do now, I can tell you I would pull a gun out because I don't like to fight and probably would lose fight even in sober state, but still would think in this drunk state should I pull a Trigger even on a person who is holding gun pointed a me. He got what he deserved.
0 likes@Soleilune Both guys were being stupid AF, but if the other guy didn't push him on the ground none of this would have happened. All he had to do was talk to him like a normal person, if he didn't leave it alone then just move the damn car or leave it and he can call the cops if he wants to.
0 likes@No Name bro what? I was just asking why they were parked there in the first place. I don’t care that they’re black
0 likesand people think its a good idea that everyone should be armed then there would be less shootings. Obviously they dont know the amount of people who own a gun just waiting for the slightest chance to use it
1 like@Adrian Gorus yea, you kinda can. You are allowed to take action to defend yourself or others from a percieved threat. You put the victim on trial in this case and charge him with assault, you aren't going to get a conviction especially once the assailant's past record starts coming out. The victim's judgment of the assailant being a threat was absolutely borne out by both the events and the record of the assailant.
0 likes@James Franksain lmao idek what your on but no violence is not broadly acceptable just because someone is standing there arguing. I dont see the immediate threat to any of the surrounding people. Following your logic the shooter was in imminent danger even though the „victim“ was walking away, ehich he wasnt. A person merely being and talking loudly is not a direct threat, only if you escalate which the „victim“ did
0 likes@Yung Tux what you’re saying is that YOU would shoot someone, because they pushed you away from their family.
1 like@Adrian Gorus you’ll never have a wife if that’s how you act when it’s to defend her from some unknown man.
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT Why his skin color is something you even consider on the justification a assaulting him is odd to me. How do you not get it? YOUR MINDSET is the SAME MINDSET he had, and turning to violence over a verbal altercation to “prove that you’re tough” is so unbelievably stupid. Dude, everyone either gets bullied or gets shit talked at some point in their life. Only hot headed people with poor self control and a childish mindset like “I’m tough I’ll show you” physically assault people over heated words. Grow up.
1 like@JF LOVECRAFT And if you would, don’t assume I’d shoot someone in this stupid situation without actually having something to quote me on that would insinuate that. Me explaining the potential mindset of the shooter is not grounds for assuming I’d do the same.
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT Nope. I explained the potential mindset of the shooter, and why it can be much more complicated than “shooting him because he was pushed.” I never once even implied that I shared the same mindset myself. And there’s no fighting that needs to happen at all. What is it with this “being a man” bullshit? The most mature thing you can do is not get into a fight over stupid shit. You’re just repeatedly projecting the same mindset that got him killed onto me. Just, don’t do what he did. As you can clearly see, it can lead to a fatally escalated situation in the blink of an eye. All you have to do is get your family and leave.
1 like@Yung Tux bro yes it is. In a situation that’s obvious as fuck, every possible mindset possibly discussed already, dude was still determined guilty. He clearly was the aggressor, he clearly only felt compelled to say something because he knew he kill somebody, and dude was clearly backing away long enough for him to realize he didn’t need to shoot.
0 likes@Adrian Gorus here's the thing: I don't buy your argument. I don't even think you really do. It's nonsense. You're arguing that a strange man yelling into a car containing a woman and children and behaving erratically isn't threatening. Like. I don't even understand the thought process that would lead you to that conclusion. If a strange man started yelling into my vehicle I would feel threatened. More so if I wasn't in my vehicle but my wife and/or kid(s) were. In this case, you have a man yelling into a vehicle and behaving erratically; he is already engaged in a conflict. "Just walking up and talking to him" is bad judgment as you are ceding the advantage of surprise against an assailant of unknown strength but known agression. Basically, on that point, you're arguing that you shouldn't kick a guy mugging you in the testes because it's not sporting.
0 likes@James Franksain his posture and body language dont seem aggressive threatening in any way and thats where i draw my conclusion from
1 like@James Franksain and also wtf he is not mugging him that example does not really fit
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT ok chief... and you might just get shot if you behave like that dude did... i mean ask him on how it turned out for him
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT Are we seriously pretending like I’m defending this guy? I know he’s guilty, and I know he deserves to be guilty. That’s not what we’re talking about anymore. What we’re talking about is the, frankly disturbing, fact that you can watch a video showing what can happen when you needlessly escalate a verbal altercation to a physical level, and still actively defend that behavior. This is why you lack self awareness. This mindset you’re supporting contributed to his death that day, and you think that needlessly starting fights has anything to do with being a man. Ignorance.
0 likes@Soleilune it started when he parked in the handicap stop. Then she should have just ignored the guy and driven off
0 likes@Adrian Gorus I see. So you're not taking into account the volume of the altercation or his posture and body language. Or maybe you've just never been assaulted before so you don't know what threatening behavior looks like outside of a movie. If that is the case, I am truly happy for you with zero sarcasm. It is not a pleasant experience.
0 likesAs for the 'mugging' analogy; You said in an earlier comment something about guessing that next time you see some guys "yelling some meanies" at your friends you should WWE slam them on the hood of your car and attributed that to my argument. I don't believe you have the moral high ground here when it comes to artistic license.
@James Franksain ok my man idk if your being serious here and yes i have been assaulted and i literally just talked about his posture and body language so idk chief
0 likes@Andre Kebala Yeesh....
0 likes@Yung Tux I got shoved in elementary school once does that justify me going on a John Wick adventure to assassinate him because he practiced the weakest piece of violence against me?
0 likesIon trust people that dap with the left hand
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT The wife and children were in the car and in NO danger at all. Just because your gf has an argument with someone, doesnt give you the right to use violence. The man was not showing physical aggression. He went straight to the man and without a word shoved him heavy. I am not saying he deserved what he got, because clearly that is not the case.
0 likes@Douglas Moore I wouldn't shot someone if I was pushed... I think it s normal not to shoot someone and take a life so easy
0 likes@Soleilune Yes. He should not have been violent. Because shouting is not the same as actually getting physical. He could have killed the angry white guy. The white guy had no assaulted his girlfriend. The problem with some people is that they become physical. Under no circumstances should you assault another person unless it's in self defense. Here Drejka was not assaulting anyone. Now Drejka should not have shot the guy, for sure, but the incident would not have occurred if common decency and common sense was applied. US is a country full of guns and aggro people. You don't push people around. You de-escalate. You get in your car and you drive off. Be the more mature person. Don't be a child who was wrong anyway because it was a handicapped bay anyhow.
0 likes@Byronic 09 there’s no reason to say “I don’t think he deserved what he got” (which means you’re saying he’s the clear victim in the situation) then turn around and say he’s the reason he got shot. It can’t be both. He either caused his own death or he didn’t.
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT No, what I am saying is the black man was wrong to shove the white man. The white man was wrong to shoot the black man. One wrong thing doesnt make another wrong thing automatically right.
0 likes@NotRelatedByBlood Nope. Especially considering the context of your situation was an elementary school quarrel. I don’t know why I need to explain the difference between the two situations and how that analogy doesn’t work. I also don’t know why I need to explain that I’m not defending his actions, because I’ve already stated that he was in the wrong. They were both in the wrong. It’s a given that the shooter is wrong in this situation, but I was explaining that he wasn’t shot FOR shoving him, but because of what that sudden turn to violence could have been leading to. The fact that he pulled out his gun is fine, the fact that he shot him after they had stepped away is the problem. I called out the “shot for shoving” thing because it rings the same bell as “shot for sleeping” or “shot for jogging down the wrong road”, where people conveniently skip one huge part of the confrontation that resulted in someone’s death for the sake of their narrative. So I wanted to explain the obvious that he wasn’t shot FOR shoving.
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT He played a part in his own death. Had he not assaulted that guy for no good reason, he wouldn’t have gotten shot, but had that other guy NOT SHOT HIM, then he’d also still be alive. Shared blame for sure, but one guy is guilty of assault and dead, and the other is guilty of murder and alive.
0 likes@Yung Tux no good reason. Ok
0 likes@NJSmashBros If you consider yourself a reasonable person, would you shoot someone because they pushed away from his family because YOU were yelling at them? It’s a yes or no question.
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT What do you not get?Starting a physical altercation over a verbal one is NOT CALLED FOR. Look where that gets you. Adults can’t just go around assaulting people who tick them off, it gets you arrested, and sometimes, hurt, clearly. That has been spelt out in front of you in this video and by me and you just don’t seem to care. Despite the horrible results of the behavior you support being shown to you, you’d still act like assaulting people over a verbal argument is acceptable behavior. DID YOU WATCH THE VIDEO?
0 likes@awesome sauce hahahaha man idk bout you but i think that shoving is definitely a prove of intent as agressive reaction and thereby giving the shooter an opportunity to use his power and still his hunger for might so i think that that guy would not have shot anyone if he didnt feel like he was in the right.
0 likes@Andre Kebala hahahahaha yeah something like that
0 likes@NJSmashBros says the guy who’s clearly only comfortable throwing insults like that over YouTube
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT Id probably still insult you in person too. What do I have to lose from it?
0 likes@JF LOVECRAFT what would you beat me up for it and prove me right?
0 likesSad that there are people defending this man. Did you hear him? In regards to people “being in that spot” and “waiting on somebody” he has a “pet peeve about it,” this man left his house and decided to be the handicap parking spot hero for the day, acting as judge jury and executioner to fulfill that role. It’s honestly sickening. Imagine being killed because this guy had a “pet peeve” about where you were parked. It’s scary, and if the guy hadn’t come out of the store when he did, I fear those babies would have been without a mother instead or even in addition. My heart hurts for this family. This guy is delusional.
39 likesReplies (7)
I can’t speak for anyone defending Michael and I believe his conviction is probably justified, however, I have a hard time feeling bad for the man who pushed him, and for that reason feel a bit conflicted about this case. Think about it, if you go about life with a policy of physically imposing yourself onto people, especially complete strangers, you’re asking for a comeuppance. Think about how different this would have looked if Michael was an intimidating and physically imposing young man. Certainly, the victim would have considered a different route of action in confronting the situation nonviolently. However, Drejka isn’t any of those things, and when McGlockton escalated the situation to a level totally disproportionate to the threat present, he invited upon himself a retribution in kind. Drejka isn’t right in what he did at all, but anybody who goes through life with the same policy for physical escalation as McGlockton demonstrated should be prepared for when they run into triggerhappy nutjob.
4 likes@Kyle Guzzardo when someone threatens your wife and kids, especially some creepy old dude, you step in and try to force any kind of conflict onto you so that your family is safe. especially as the argument already seemed heated. you dont have time to reflect your life choices and think about the possibility of some lunatic immediatly gunning you down
8 likes@Kyle Guzzardo I dunno. Some weirdo circling you car with wife and kids inside? As a parent, I'd get pretty defensive too. Was it right he got shoved? No. But what did this jackwagon expect? He was looking for trouble. He already had complaints regarding road rage and threatening people with his gun. He wanted a fight so he could use it on someone and finally feel like a big man. Guy is as transparent as a ghost. He's a poster child for why not everyone should be allowed to carry.
3 likes@Kyle Guzzardo one of the tenets of conceal carry is to attempt to avoid confrontation to begin with because you DO have a weapon and you DON'T want to actually use it. This guy has spent the last 25 years of his life just hoping for the opportunity to shoot someone. If he was truly a responsible firearm owner he would have minded his own business when it came to ridiculous nit picky stuff like handicap parking spots at "his gas station".
1 like@Nahala Stone I completely agree with your assessment of Drejka. I would go further and argue that any adult should understand that there exists Drejkas out in the world, that there are disempowered people just waiting for an opportunity to feel powerful. What I’m saying is that McGlockton escalated conflict with Drejka into physical assault in incredibly foolish manner. Why open yourself up to an assault charge, or worse, give a stranger any reason to return the use of force on you? Of course we should protect your loved ones, but a shouting match out in public is no cause to physically exert yourself on someone. McGlockton was understandably angry, but using physical force to intimidate submission from a stranger is foolish, foolish, foolish. Just tell the bastard to fuck off and leave, right?
0 likesthis comments good and all but i enjoy the name
0 likes@Hannah where do you live if getting pushed to the ground by total strangers is a common occurrance?
0 likesIt actually bothers me that if he had a lawyer and the lawyer told him exactly what to say to get off, that he most likely would've gotten off. That's messed up.
29 likesReplies (2)
AGREE! I can’t stop thinking about that either.
1 likeI agree with your point, however, I would bet that he wouldnt have gotten off scott-free, but likely could have gotten a lesser charge. Remember, it is better for us, the pleebs, to allow 100 guilty people free than falsely imprison 1 innocent person.
0 likesIts giving michael dunn..
0 likesPeople walking around thinking they're G.I Joe, roleplaying as law enforcement lol. The way he was using certain phrases as if he was apart of the force. What a waste of atoms this guy is.
185 likesReplies (3)
iMmEdIaTe ThReAt NeUtRaLiZeD
6 likes"Waste of atoms" 🤣🤣🤣 but for real tho
2 likesbased avatar
1 likeAnd that ladies and gentlemen, is why I will never move to the U.S.
0 likesI could SEE how someone could make a case for being legitimately scared of significant bodily harm after being pushed from a sizeable dude like that and then him lifting his shirt waistband the way he did. But Michael waited enough time after pulling out his pistol to see the other guy wasn't about to keep being aggressive, then decided "you know what, I want to shoot this man for pushing me to the ground" which is NOT okay.
642 likesReplies (50)
This is exactly it. You can tell he thought about it, then decided he should shoot him. I think the Jury got it right.
93 likes@steviewonder105 exactly
8 likesAgreed. The full 30 years would be a bit harsh but he definitely should do some time.
3 likes@Kyle G idk 30 years sounds about right. That kind of rage plus a firearm is dangerous to have running around out there.
67 likesIt is okay actually. That savage guy isn't going to be pushing innocent strangers to the ground ever again. Imagine how many people have head injuries, brain damage, or are unable to walk again etc. because of the violent rage from a guy that attacks people who are simply talking to other people.
22 likes@Itz Deer Everyone here was wrong. They shouldn’t have parked there, he shouldn’t have pushed, the man shouldn’t have shot.
42 likes@Josie Koch I would agree if he was not attacked first. The man attacked him for simply speaking with his wife.
9 likes@Kyle G He pushed him because small children were in the car and he see’s someone yelling at them. Maybe scary them. Since Mike initiated the fight, he also told the cops that he wasn’t scared because he brings a gun. Which means he put himself in situations where he may have to use a gun to get out of it
32 likes@Kyle G Um, he was yelling at his wife and the kids. I agree that the push was maybe not helpful, but it's understandable that a dad wants to protect his wife and kids.
27 likes@Milktube nice troll. Either that or you're delusional.
18 likesYou can feign surrender/pacification.
0 likes@ann Early You shouldn't push someone simply because they're yelling.
9 likes@ann Early You realize that its not against the law to talk loudly to another person right? So he didn't do anything wrong there, they were the ones actually breaking the law which is why he confronted them.
8 likes@Josie Koch Do you believe that its a completely normal reaction to attack a person for yelling at your wife while she is currently committing a crime?
6 likes@Kyle G actually Michael was also parked illegally which is fucking ironic. He was confronting people with a gun in his pocket over illegal parking while parking illegally himself lmao
21 likes@Joel McKnight He was parked illegally also? I didn't know that..but that doesn't make any real difference because two wrongs don't make a right.
3 likes@Kyle G I’m not sure where you’re going with this tbh given your previous comment but suffice to say dude deserved more time for this murder
8 likesIts a tricky situation... Honestly this case is fascinating. Removing the personality of this case and the emotions... I am really 50 50 on this one.
7 likesHe was shoved hard... Really hard, adrenaline kicks in... Shoved from the back too. Id have drawn too, and probably shot too.
The difference is I wouldnt be causing drama like a meathead.
@Kyle G "committing a crime"? she was in the handicapped parking space, not shooting up the store.
15 likes@Mira .45 did you watch the video? JCS even points out several times that Drejkas own testimony points out that he didn’t believe eh was actually in fear of his own life, he exited the scene with a SORE shoulder and arm. Didn’t even break.
13 likesI just don’t see how you can say it “hard. Really hard” it was a shove. It looks different to different people but the facts are facts. Drejkas own words, and the injuries he sustained combined with the fact the victim actually stepped away before being shot means drejka is simply a murderer.
Having a gun doesn’t mean you can shoot people because they’re mean to you. Even if they commit battery, you still don’t get to murder them outright.
@Joel McKnight You are so bias...
1 like@Mira .45 He did defend himself by pulling the gun. The guy retreats, he shoots him anyway. Thats not self defense.
10 likesAnd don't be berating someones family if you don't want an altercation. Mind your own fucking business and you wouldn't be in prison and a man wouldn't be dead and his family ruined.
@ann Early And seeing daddy pushing a man over isn't going to scare the kids worse? That poor Dad should have got in the car and left, but ultimately he was the victim here, even if his actions weren't ideal, he didn't deserve a bullet. Poor kids.
1 like@Joel McKnight Doesn't matter how "hard" the push is, if you fall and fall wrong you can fucking die. Someone can punch you and if you are caught off guard and fall smashing your skull into the concrete you can die right there and then. This guy was pushed from behind so he certainly wasn't guarding against a sudden force and shouldn't have shot but simply called the police and waited, even so being rude and yelling at people is just that, being rude. We don't live in the fucking stone age and you don't have the right to physically assault someone because they're rude. He wasn't kicking or scratching at their car, he wasn't beating the shit out of his wife and kids, this guy came out of the store and his first reaction was not to tell the rude guy to back off and leave them alone but immediately launch into a physical confrontation. Play stupid games win stupid prizes. I can't imagine living in the U.S. where there are far more guns than people and just attacking someone who is being aggressive with no thought given that they just might be this way because they have a gun.
5 likes@Oxydino what a long way to say “what if”
6 likesI mean shit Batman if you want to get into what if’s... what if drejka didn’t confront people over parking spaces with a gun in his pocket?
But regardless battery doesn’t equal murder, good luck with that argument in court bud
@The Mudpit tf if I see a man yelling at my wife and kids I’d push him too
3 likes@Miadolph72 73 So you a think walking up to someone and starting a argument over a parking spot is reasonable? Especially if it's not affecting you directly at all. You think it's the guys fault who died? Are you serious?! The man who fired his weapon hand done that sort of thing 4 times prior and he isn't in the wrong at all? You disgust me...you ideology is screwed and you need help.
1 like@Didace Matthews No I don’t, he should have minded his own business. However, once the guy came out of the store and escalated the situation it was a game on. There is no doubt in my mind that had he not shot him he would have done serious damage to him. What was he supposed to do, lay on his back and wait for this obviously bigger and clearly violent (already established) individual to pounce on him? You cant possible out yourself in that mans shoes who no doubt feared for his life. When you put your hands on someone there is no telling what will happen. Play stupid games get stupid prizes.
2 likesYeah there is a solid case to be made the response was somewhat reasonable if not for the fact the camera caught that the guy was pulling away. As someone who's been in quote a few fights things can go south really quick. I have seen a guy be killed from a single punch when I was 15. If he had continued the killing would have been regrettable but could have been justified. But as soon as he started backing away the gun did it's job and that should have been the end of it.
1 like@Josie Kosch No, it's not. If you engage with someone physically it's pure chance whether they die or not. As mentioned above I have witnessed firsthand someone die from a single punch. He shouldn't have shot him as he had started to pull away but it could very easily have been reversed roles.
2 likesYou know, the laws were made for the law breakers. The guy should not have put his family in jeopardy and park where he would be legal. And when confronted even knowing he was in violation of the law would not accept reprimand and chose to push the guy. None of it's pretty. It's a case where evil is destroying evil. When do you start commending what's right?
2 likes@James Trail @James Trail "Evil is destroying evil", "Putting his family in jeopardy by parking". You guys need to stop with the victim blaming and grow a pair of brain cells. Hint: You don't deserve death for parking in a handicap parking for a couple of mins. It being brief doesn't justify breaking the law but it's far from warranting death. And no laws were not made for law breakers, they are *made to keep order* . Even so they are human made and they have flaws. There are plenty of non aggressive ways to resolve the situation and I guarantee you if a kid is tough enough to pick himself after getting hurt in the playground, it doesn't take much to suck up your pride. He clearly suffered no injuries from it while shooting a human dead was justified. The worst part of it all is that if he had a lawyer before speaking he probably would have gotten away with it too
4 likesThis is the only reply that actually gets to the core of the issue.
3 likesI don't understand how some people interpreted this as him shooting someone over parking on a disabled parking lot—it's about him shooting after it was clear that he wasn't in any imminent danger after firing.
I'd say he was justified in and up to getting mad at someone for parking on a disabled parking lot illegally, and pulling a gun (in America) when assaulted from another unknown assailant. But, then pausing after his assailant stops his attack and backs off after seeing the gun, and THEN shooting after he has had time to deliberate is the crime.
@Kyle G Maybe 5 years tops
1 like@ObiWAANKenobi 44 another man intimidating and yelling at his wife and children? Idk, can't really blame the dude for shoving him
1 like@Oxydino oh Jesus christ. You can accidentally die if someone bumps into you, and you fall and hit your head on something. The likelihood of something like that happening is extremely rare
0 likes@Oxydino i don't think the guy should've shoved him? You're arguing that its reasonable for the dude to fear for his life because people die from getting shoved. Which is an incredibly dumb argument.
1 like"I just love how because one guy pulled a gun, we must justify the other one using violence" ... I honestly have no idea what you're talking about dude. Should the guy have shoved him? No. Is it reasonable to fear for your life if someone shoves you, ESPECIALLY if you already have a gun on you? No. Dunno why you're getting so worked up about this
@ICryAllDayAllNight I never said he feared for his life, hell I said that he should be punished for killing a man so don't project. We don't know what was going on in his head, maybe he felt that fear and maybe he didn't. He looked like the type who'd think he was "weak" if he admitted that he was afraid so I don't really put much weight in his words. Don't act like your statement wasn't made to minimise assault, because it clearly was and in doing so you are trying to argue that the guy who died was innocent, which he wasn't. That being said, two wrongs don't make a right. This is just a situation that could have very easily been resolved had a single mature adult been involved instead it's just a bunch of children and lunatics.
0 likesI’ve had worse injuries from tripping over my own feet than this guy had from being shoved
1 like@Terrestrial Creature Finally. This is the correct take.
0 likesYeah maybe if he had shot a second or a second thirty before he did I would believe he was justified. This is just because 2.3 seconds (or whatever it was) in my opinion was enough to realize he was backing off. This going off of the footage of course
1 like@Terrestrial Creature Bingo.
0 likes@Milktube You are not very observant, are you? Innocent stranger? The shooter started the whole thing, dude. He harassed the couple. There was nothing "innocent" about him--just the opposite. Pay attention to facts.
0 likes@Terrestrial Creature You seem to be suggesting the three things are comparable when they are anything but.
0 likes@Kyle G He was yelling at the couple and harassing them. He wasn't just "speaking" to the wife. He instigated the whole thing--and was happy to because he figured that he could just claim self-defense is anybody took exception to his bull$hit.
0 likes@Richard Ernsberger What do you mean?
0 likes@Terrestrial Creature EXACTLY there were so many chances to avoid this situation,the only one i feel sorry for is the poor kid who had to watch his father die
0 likes@Nicole VintagePigeon Bruh that wouldn’t have solved anything
0 likes@Terrestrial Creature Broskin……sarcasm…..he was aggressive near her and her children though
0 likes@Nicole VintagePigeon Ah lol
1 likeDam so basically got killed for using the wrong parking spot
0 likesJudge: “How do you plead?”
931 likesMike: “Negative”
Replies (2)
Im weak 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
5 likes🤣 “say again, you honor.”
4 likes25 days later..?!?
0 likes>gets mad at a family for parking in handicapped spot
355 likes>illegally parks to confront them
Replies (6)
illegally kills them
28 likes@Fluffy Pancakes trolling, much
0 likeswe do a little bit of trolling
0 likes@Blue Skies we do a little trolling
0 likes@Fluffy Pancakes substantial amount of trolling today
0 likesLOL cause those two things are deifnitely the same 🤣
0 likesNone of it would have happened in the first place if the guy hadn't been parked in a handicap space with no right to do so. They had no reason to be parked in a handicap parking space.
1 likeThe scariest person out there. Someone looking for trouble with a gun holstered. Tries to sound militant which makes him extremely dangerous.
277 likesReplies (11)
Ew I know someone like that. They have a complex. "Dare to disrespect me?!" Type of controlling issues
24 likes@газировка Obscured watch out for them
11 likesYeah cause When i think military i think grenades.
0 likes@War Dog yeah, so justified he's serving 20 years. in THE stand your ground state 🙄
14 likesWar Dog that’s not what the jury thought. Self defense when the guy is walking backwards. That guy was waiting to do that to someone and he picked on the women because he’s a coward. Again he’s the last person who should own a gun.
6 likes@War Dog a jury of his peers disagree with you. Have a seat
2 likes@War Dog did you... not watch this video? the deceased shoved this guy and he fell on the ground. he pulled out his gun and aimed it, and the deceased took steps back, starting to turn away. and then this guy shot.
3 likesthat's running at someone?
@War Dog ??? drejka pulled out his gun WHILE he was on the ground, meaning after he was shoved. drejka was never holding the gun while he was still harassing the woman in the car. and what do you mean "if he had backed away he wouldn't be anywhere near the gunman"? he shoved him, meaning space was created between the two of them. he was clearly about to approach him again, drejka pulled out his gun, and then he took steps back, like i originally wrote. or maybe you're just seeing what you want to see. do you need me to timestamp all of this? there is literal footage in case you forgot??
3 likesyou're either confusing this footage with another incident or just making up an excuse for drejka to shoot a man outside a 7-11 over a handicap parking space. ridiculous.
@War Dog annnnd there it is. thanks for making your bias crystal clear
5 likes@War Dog you can keep that sorry. I'm not hurt over a random dude on the internet being a racist. I'm unsurprised.
5 likesO Med well said!!
2 likesI'd honestly have a lot more respect for this man if he just said "i panicked because I was pushed, I wasn't thinking straight and shot first asked questions later." But instead he had to make a bunch of stuff up.
134 likesThis guy was cocky and angry and just looking for an excuse to use his weapons, imo.
Replies (5)
Exactly what I was thinking
6 likesThis is one of the best responses on this page. I followed this case from the day it happened, and the shooting itself was pretty textbook self defense, it was the shooters actions before the shooting, and the way he responded after the shooting that got him thrown in jail. That said, shoving a man to the ground like that is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury, and had the guy that got shot continued his attack in any way, the shooter would have been completely justified. Dude panicked, like most of us would, and was likely knocked senseless in the initial attack, he should have just admitted it instead of pretending to be Capt swat commander.
6 likes@Don Quasebarth lmfao at "knocked senseless". I've been hit harder in pee wee football when I was 11 and I wasn't "knocked senseless". He had a full 2 seconds prior to pulling the trigger on a man backing away (read de-escalating). Seems like he though through his actions.
15 likes@Robert Slusher well yea at 11 you're healing faster, your fall isn't as high, you have better reflexes to catch yourself and prevent serious harm
1 likebut I still agree the shooting was unjustified, even still the victim is at fault of his own aswell
@Robert Slusher I've gotten hit quite hard in my youth, and been hit quite hard later in life. Theres absolutely no comparison between a 12 year old playing football, expecting to be hit, and a middle age man blindsided and hit hard enough to throw him several feet. When I was twelve I used to jump out of trees quite high in the air, and just last week I tore my knee up walking into a table. Older bodies are more frail. If this guy didnt get the wind knocked out of him and become momentarily disoriented I'd be suprised, because that is the norm for these kinds of violent assaults. Nobody in this scenario did the right thing, from the illegal parking, to the stupid arguement, battery that prompted the shooting.
0 likesGiving very much Michael Dunn t’s
0 likesFun fact: on average, it takes a person under stress roughly 1 second to process a changing situation and form a response to it. This guy took more than double that time. He thought about it, decided he had a case for self-defense, and went for the kill.
186 likesReplies (12)
I think he might've went back and forth inside his mind at that time. First he drew the gun with the intention to shoot, then he thought about how he'd get charged for doing so, knowing that what he's doing is wrong, but then he realized he has an opportunity to kill someone and get away with it, since he can plead self defense, to then later brag about to friends. I hate his guts.
24 likesKeep in mind, he's 46 and so his brain probably processes slower than someone in their prime, also the pain from landing on concrete would've caused an adrenaline flood and would've clouded his thinking more
8 likes@Near pod Wtf lmao, me saying that landing on your wrist on concrete fuckin hurts makes me a racist? I'm just talking from experience since I've skated for 3 years. Maybe don't call people racist as your first argument because they say that landing on a hard surface hurts lol
21 likes@Autumn May Well, it still is one hell of a stretch to say his judgement was clouded because he hurt his wrist, let alone compare it with skating.
4 likes@Autumn May ‘the average human’ has nothing to do with being in someone’s prime. Being 46 does not mean your brain functions twice as slowly as the average. That would also suggest that you believe the ‘average human’ is someone in their twenties or thirties. And that the study which results were referred to only used people in this age range in the study. Which doesn’t make any sense. Secondly, adrenaline flush happens in stressed quickly changing situations, which is exactly what was mentioned. Falling onto concrete does in no way change your bain’s capability to asses situations and form responses. The devil has enough advocates, please don’t try to discredit when your argument is so easily torn to shreds by common logic
0 likes@nat I simply don't believe someone with this low of brain capacity could jump back and forth and decide he could win a lawsuit before trying to kill, considering he didnt seem to know if his bullet even hit and wanted to know what happened. If he was trying to kill I doubt he'd shoot once, then assume he did it, he doesnt even seem like someone out for bloodlust. I think he fell down, misguidedly thought the man was stepping towards him and shot. We can all have our opinions but I dont believe he could logic out the situation in 2.5 seconds
1 like@nat Also, yes, pain does affect alot. Your brain flushes your system with adrenaline to help with the pain so you dont feel it as immediately, that can also affect vision and thinking. Its dumb to think pain simply didnt factor into the equation
0 likes@Autumn May that pain argument isn't very powerful if you go back to around 18:40 he talks about how hard the shive was. But around that same time he says he felt non of it.
0 likesEdit: He also specifies that he was only slightly dazed and not very dazed.
@Bizness man He didnt feel it at the time because of the adrenaline flush to block out the pain, because that's what the body does. I'm just saying that that probably had an effect on his thinking. Even pain aside I don't personally see this man as the type to be able to fully asses a situation and correct his decision accordingly in 2.5 seconds, especially after being physically assaulted just before
1 like@Autumn May well even then he explicitly goes to out of his way to specify his condition to be a little dazed even when he wasn't asked im not saying your wrong but with him saying that he's implying the the pain was not enough to impair his judgement
1 like@Bizness man Fair point, I think it's always up for debate, thanks for being civil about it all. Even though we have different views. I've been called racist more than once over this... because if you have an opinion someone disagrees with you're a terrible human now I guess
0 likes@Autumn May ah man im sorry to hear that. And yeah i agree no matter what the argument, its important respect on another's opinion
1 like"Someone stepped on my foot"
4030 likes"What happened next?"
"I carpet bombed the area. 21 foot rule"
Replies (31)
LMFAO. I had to read that 2x lol
9 likesLmao dude you made me laugh ahha thanks
3 likes😂😂😂
2 likesStepping on someone's toe is unintentional.
6 likes@AusDenBergen that depends
2 likes@Jintaro Kensei it was just a false equivalency is all
4 likes@AusDenBergen I've had people try to stomp my foot intentionally. I'd argue that it may be more painful than being pushed onto a flat concrete parking lot.
20 likesHere you go : https://youtu.be/pMl3_cz05Jo
0 likesGod bless America 💪😩🤏
1 likeLmao fucking leveled the entire city because someone scuffed my shoe.
13 likes@Zeroshiki I always carry a tactical nuke in my pocket for such occasions.
22 likes"Force multiplier" this guy speaks weird.
0 likes21 foot rule what da fuck
0 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likes🤣🤣🤣
0 likesOmg, this is perfect
0 likesRoflmao
0 likes@Cow gang hm
0 likesOmg it's 3:37 am, I shouldn't be laughing this hard right now lol
2 likes😂😂😂
0 likes🤣🤣
0 likes🤣
0 likes"Someone argue with my wife about wrong parking"
2 likes"What happened next?"
"I dont try to argue like a human being, and i brutally push this 50yo man on the ground"
"What happened next?"
"I thought i was the strongest alpha male, but no dice, he had a piece"
Isn't that the Vietnam war in a nutshell?
0 likes@Cow gang Holdup
0 likes@Ahmed Hussain 21 feet is roughly thr distance an attacker with a knife can close the distance before a person can react draw and fire. Outside 21 feet the gun wins, inside 21 feet the knife (when gun is holstered) can win
0 likes@AusDenBergen ehhh not really since stepping on someone's toe is as threatening as someone walking back from you when you have a gun on them.
0 likes@Cow gang hold up-
0 likesStop downplaying what the victim did.. if he didnt have a gun it was getting worse for him.. he pulled up his shorts before seeing a gun which is an offensive stance taken before taking a fight..he was untrained to hzndle such situation and and pressure blurred his thinking and fired when he shouldnt have
0 likes@N V the point is that getting punched is not the same as getting killed. Equivalent force rules are in effect when you have the upper hand. Restraint, willpower and discipline are required, things this guy clearly lacks.
0 likes@Jintaro Kensei and i agree with that.. but also.. arguing verbally is not the same as getting pushed to the ground.. he could have broken his arm.. and the guy was ready to do more... it sucks that the guys was stupid not to realize he was backing away... but we cant downplay how aggressive the victim was... if u have a much stronger and younger guy coming to fight u.. then its not really a fair fight.. so it is fair that he needed a weapon to defend him self.. its just stupid and wrong. that he took the decision to fire when he was backing away.
0 likes19 MINUTES 😧
0 likesThe guy views the police officers as equals and friends rather than superiors who are trying to send him to jail. But lol I’m grateful because this really fucked his case over
366 likesReplies (3)
That's what police officers do. Civilians aren't allowed to lie to police but police are completely allowed to lie which really leads to scummy behavior. Furthermore, they are really focused on elevating their careers so they don't care about ensnaring innocent people. Then, you mix their intelligence and things like the blue line, you really get a screwed up justice system.
5 likes@Shnood getting a confession from innocent people is literally counterintuitive to the system
1 like@Shnood typing emojis and mocking someone isn’t going to help push this argument. You need to be able to realize how that can trap and ensnare innocent people into coming across as guilty for a crime they didn’t commit
0 likesIf he wasnt breaking the law, illegally parking in a handicapped space and unlawfully assaulted him he would still be alive today. Unfortunate the man he assaulted was likely a racist looking for a reason to kill a black man. But regardless it all started with him being a jerk. Sad story all around, except for the part where this guy spends his life where he belongs, in prison.
1 likeThis is for the forensics girls. Are you single?
0 likesAs someone who uses a wheelchair, I don’t consider it my job to police this type of situation. If someone is parking in a disabled parking spot then I would go into the shopping centre (for example) and speak to management. You don’t know who’s driving the car and what sort of person they are.
639 likesReplies (21)
Exactly! I am disabled and have a placard but I don’t consider myself the parking police. If non-disabled people want to be allies, being the parking police is not the way to do it.
46 likesEspecially in Florida.
7 likes@UselessJr yup Don’t mess with those folks
3 likesyou never know someone's situation, so I definitely appreciate this. like I don't have a placard, but I just had heart surgery a couple of weeks ago and have found myself needing to do this for picking up medication or other small things
13 likes@Alli M. Exactly, you never know someone's situation. Not to mention, as someone with a disability that is evident and obvious to all, I get annoyed by always being labelled as it is. Subsequently, someone with a heart condition, for example, may not want to be labelled as disabled. It is just not up to the public to police these situations.
8 likes@Sounds of a Silent Mind correct, ultimately this was a traffic violation not a life or death/ combative/ emergency situation. It's so sad all those lives were forever impacted by something that should have been at most a ticket
7 likes@Sounds of a Silent Mind and as far as "disabled" I can't really get a placard because it was not a physical handicap as much as a rough recovery from a major surgery. My recovery period is not long enough to warrant a placard.
3 likes@Alli M. That must be annoying for you. I'm sure they could have handed out a temporary placard. Unfortunately, many people don't understand the reason why there are disabled allocated car parking places. Because a wheelchair symbol designates them as such, many people think that if you're not using a wheelchair or an ambulatory device, then you shouldn't use them. However, as you realise, they are put close to entrances of shopping centres so that people who cannot walk long distance can use them also. Having major surgery means the last thing you want to do is walk more than a minute to get inside the centre.
5 likes@Alli M. blessings bud Go apply for one though it’s a hefty fine
1 likeAlternatively, you can mount a minigun on either side of your wheelchair and just start blasting. XD
4 likesBesides, there are people who may have a good reason to use a disabled parking spot without having a disabled parking badge. A relative of mine suffers from a strange case of bowel incontinence - essentially, he can't feel when he has to go to the toilet, until it's extremely urgent. At times, this means he has to park his car and go to the toilet in a store - and sometimes, the parking spot for disabled people is the only spot left. The riddiculous thing is that this is recognized legally as a disability, but due to the laws here, you only get a parking badge if your disability affects your ability to walk.
5 likes@MechMK1 That's very unfair for your relative. Incontinence of any type is extremely socially isolating for the person suffering. It's hard enough people with that condition to go out as it is.
2 likes@Sounds of a Silent Mind Indeed, but it's the result of the law mandating that parking badges are only handed out to people with impaired mobility. It really is a shame.
2 likesI have had many instances where I have driven my disabled mother around and parked disabled. Sometimes my mother doesnt have the strength to stay in the store so will return to the car. My mother is only 45 and i am in my 20s so there have been a few times where i have been accused of "not being disabled" or "taking the spot from another person who needs it". But never have someone been this aggresive to me. It's really not that serious, nor is it your business to confront someone about it
2 likes@Crime Brûlée exactly mfs that try to be “allies” be doing the extremes that don’t actually help anyone. like go vote on something about rights for people with disabilities. don’t shoot someone who is using the EMPTY parking space like it’d be different if a handicapped person was in the parking lot but there was no one even trying to use the spot. in that situation you just ignore it……….
2 likes@MechMK1 No offense, but can't your relative wear adult diapers? There isn't always a bathroom around and he won't break the law this way..
0 likesLove your moniker.
0 likes@Alli M. - You also don’t know if someone had a gun to defend themselves, so maybe don’t push them to the ground.
0 likesliterally.
0 likesLol so send some poor cart pusher to deal with the unknown danger.... nice
0 likesAlso you have a right kinda because you’re disabled this guy isn’t
1 likeI know this isn't a popular view point.
1 likeHowever, I think it's undeniable he could have been killed being pushed that hard blindside onto concrete.
surprise surprise the wannabe cop has German Shepard’s
0 likesLemme guess... he fantasied for 26 years using that fire arm, day after day he tried to put himself in such a position where he could escalate a situation until finally he could shoot at somebody.
420 likesReplies (11)
The mind of 98.99% of gun owners. I know, I live in Alabama, the NRA's red-light district.
23 likesIts ok he is suffering in prison now.
4 likesIf you notice, this is always the case...
4 likeshe really did hope for it. also pulled the gun on a mother with her two children. what a coward
4 likesYou're exactly right. And I wish more people would understand this.
1 likeYou just hit the nail in the torso
1 likePretty much what he is, looking at his gun getting a hard on, thinking boy I cant wait to use this.. he had four prior road rage related incident where he threatened them with a gun. Even a mom and her kids.
8 likesHe should haved joined the police.
1 like@Dalion Heart What a drag. Here in Ireland, the cops don't even have guns.
2 likesSuper Sonico what a waste of life. In many cities they shoot at each other at younger age 🤷🏻♂️
0 likesJust like Michael Dunn. His neighbour from a place where he lived before Satellite Beach said Dunn previously stated that he would want to shoot someone (or something to that effect).
0 likesInteresting how his arm is so hurt he needs to use his shirt as a sling for it, but the moment he starts reenacting the scene from the floor he can gesture and all with it no issue....
1379 likesReplies (28)
Let’s all agree Dumb met Dumber that day. Marquis made a Grave mistake putting his hands on someone even if Moron was yapping about a Handicap Spot. Think before you react goes both ways.
43 likesYeah! He forgot he was pretending his arm was soooo injured.
9 likesHaha his hand is way up now.
3 likes@Poker Joker facts don’t go around pushing punching a guy cuz he is telling your girl friend to park correctly, maybe if he would’ve acted like a rational civilized human being he would still be living but nope wanted to act out now look he got killed at a gas station lmao xD
7 likes@semaj yar I agree that he shouldn’t have pushed the guy, but if you have a problem with someone parking in a handicap spot, you can easily tell someone in the store or call the police, it simple.
31 likes@Shronk Woozonski you’re right people loved and still love that person i have no right to speak on another persons death, i am sorry i said that.
15 likes@semaj yar it's not like you can't talk about it. Just don't laugh about it.
4 likes@Poker Joker Yeah agreed. They were both. Marquis didn't deserve nor was Micheal justified. A murd3r is a murd3r. But both parties were wrong in this one.
2 likes@HELP!!! hOW dO InPUt uSeRnAMe? Negative, you can't fault a man for protecting his family from some random person who's intentions are unknown.
6 likes@commoguru What he did wasn't protecting his family. He blindsided a guy to the ground for being in a verbal argument with his spouse. An argument that he had 0 reason to believe was going to get physical since neither party was approaching the other.
1 likeIf things had turned out differently and the other didn't have a weapon on hand, he would have been charged with assault.
@semaj yar shoving a man doesn't call for death. he clearly stepped away when the defendant pulled out his weapon, there was no need to shoot, he already made his point.
9 likes@semaj yar damn….I just seen you apologized …. I was going to delete my comment but that would be hiding my mistake. So my bad. Just got heated when I read your comment and responded with out reading any other comments. You apologized like a real one. My apologies.
4 likeshuh. almost like he's acting.
0 likesXxx
1 like@Poker Joker Yes. I'm not condoning what happened. But the whole situation was incredibly dumb.
0 likes@HELP!!! hOW dO InPUt uSeRnAMe? Yea, he was protecting his family, he had no way of knowing what that guy's intentions are. Could have easily been someone road raging. Simple fact is, you don't approach occupied vehicles in an aggressive manner like that, he's lucky he wasn't the one shot.
2 likes@Poker Joker a simple push and a murder are not comparable.
5 likesImagine if you pushed someone and he shot you in the heart as a response.
@Stacey Obrien he was injured so shut up about it
0 likes@Сергей Владимирович Таборицкий It’s called DO NOT PUT YOUR HANDS ON ANYONE! You can’t do it or expect consequences. That’s just the way it is.
0 likes@semaj yar If she’s not His Wife, she’s not His anything except His Turn.
0 likes@Poker Joker so you're saying, ones response to a slap to the face should be a shotgun round through the head?
1 likeShould a mistake or misbehavior cost you your life without any chance of improvement?
@semaj yar he made one unseen fatal mistake, does that really justify clowning on him?
0 likessemaj yar joking about and making fun of somebody who died for no good reason is absolutely pathetic there is something wrong with you, get some help
0 likesi think he realized that and thats when he brought up his arm hurting again 😄 this guy is so pathetic and lame. "Should the video show him charging at you?" "It should" what do you mean it should?
0 likes@semaj yar and the cowardly bully and murderer who was not minding his own business is in prison where he belongs
0 likes@White Alliance where was he injured?
0 likesThe “ughh,, left hand”
0 likes@Poker Joker so the differences in feeling how to protect someone depend on legal contracts? That’s just silly come on man
0 likesAnd to think, this could have all been 100% avoided if good ol' Michael hadn't started acting like a Karen 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
1 like51:05 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOF
0 likes"neutralize the immediate threat no need to go overboard"
613 likesbruh you fucking killed him
Replies (23)
Yeah but he watched him run away. An argument could have been made that he didn’t want to kill him. Unfortunately he died but one bullet isn’t always fatal
5 likesBut he didn't overkill
7 likesIt’s the American way.
5 likes@jeremy mullens Could've aimed at somewhere other than center mass then. The prosecution was right though; there was no reason to fire at all when simply keeping that gun raised had already neutralized the threat.
67 likesThe guy acts like it’s a gta mission
13 likes@a1000island Just a regular kill not an overkill
6 likes@jeremy mullens Why was it okay to shoot him over a push? Pushing someone harassing your family warrants the death penalty now??
26 likes@rat bastian so if he got shot but didn't die then its fine? Is the problem that he died?
1 like@Bryan Flores No? He shouldn't have been shot either way
13 likesIf he hadn’t had a gun and the guy pushed him down then stomped on his head, would it have been warranted? Was the pushing for talking to the woman warranted? These things are rarely so black and white affairs. The tragedy remains that a man died and another man lost his freedom. But, all parties involved seem like assholes to me. That’s all I call them: assholes. I’m not calling them evil or malicious. It’s a grey area, and I have no more righteousness in me than the poor wretches in this incident.
9 likes“Murderd”
0 likes@rat bastian amen
3 likes@rat bastian Yeah, I don't think any one action in that chain of events was justified. It was all stupid crap that got real damn serious. I'm not defending either party. And I don't think it's psycho to look deeper at things. If it was my jury I would want some critical minds on the bench.
0 likesAnd yeah, it's a fucking tragedy that a man lost his life and a man lost his freedom. Maybe you've never had to take those things from someone. You can do it and it can be justified and you may have no regrets about it whatsoever, except that it is always an assault on your own dignity to have to take that from another. Leastways, if you're not a psycho.
Basically wants a pat on the back for not proceeding to kill other people in his line of sight.
2 likes@O_and1193 Lmao
0 likes@Bex Kroezen It's relevant because to justify the shooting Wannabe Cop had to believe that he was about to get his head stomped. As I said, that did not happen, so we cannot know.
0 likes@TheSirPrise Okay, so if you're always to aim for centre mass (interesting information btw, I didn't know that), you need to accept the fact that any shot can (and assume it will) be fatal.
1 like@free_live_free - He may have believe that, but the guy backed right off the second he saw the gun, no need to shoot.
3 likes@free_live_free - No I've certainly never taken someone's life and if you think having you freedom taken away for something like that is tragic, THAT is psychotic to me. Analytical doesn't mean you give both sides equal treatment, in fact it's exactly the opposite - you give each side it's DUE treatment. The jury had all the facts, it's literally on video. Glockerton pushing Drejka over is a hundred times more justified in terms of defense (he was defending his family), and anything else you try and make up is flat out wrong. That's the end of it.
0 likes@theninjascientist Exactly, you never aim your gun unless you mean to shoot to kill. It's a heavy responsibility. Warning shots are also illegal and you can be taken to court for shooting it in the air or at the ground etc. That's why in situations like these lawyers and gun instructors etc., always advice that you emphasise "my life was in immanent danger" because if the case goes to court then the prosecution can try and work all sorts of angles as to why the force was disproportionate to the threat. They also advise that if you do carry the gun and do follow through with using it in self-defence that you should always expect legal backlash in one form or another, it's inevitable. That's why you need to emphasise 'my life was in immanent danger' to put yourself firmly in the lines of self-defence and so the police and prosecution have no wiggle room to put you in a different category (e.g. manslaughter or homicide). The police don't care about who is right or wrong, they're there to fill quotas and to ascend the career ladder.
1 like@carpetfluff false, if you're going to "aim not at the center of mass" don't pull your gun at all.
0 likes@theninjascientist Yes.
0 likes@rat bastian When you lock a man up, take him into custody, make him dependent on you for his survival, it is a hit on YOUR dignity. The criminal, presumably, got what he deserved. His incarceration is not something you should revel in. Unless you're a psychotic and then you shouldn't hold such power.
0 likesGlockerton didn't deserve to die. That was tragic. Drejka got awarded what he was due from society, locked up. Correct and in line with the letter of the law and tragic. None of that dumb shit needed to happen.
Ridiculous
0 likeseveryone was in wrong here, she shouldn't have parked there, he shouldnt have tried to enforce the law without being law enforcement, the victim shouldn't have shoved him to the ground, and he shouldnt have opened fire.
0 likesReplies (3)
Who gives a flying F&%$ about the parking spot lol
0 likes@Music Life because its the thing that triggered the case to unfold
0 likes@A No it's not. The initial trigger is this maniac starting a confrontation which he doesn't need to do.
0 likesI am not anti-gun but it is apparent to me that this guy has been looking for an excuse to use his cool Glock for quite a while.
2 likesWhen this first happened, I said that the case could go either way based on interviews/ confessions/ attorney/ and jury.
82 likesBut once I learned he pulled his gun multiple times during road rage incidents, he lost all possible support from me.
Dude was looking for trouble and had an ego due to his gun.
I know dozens of people that have carried for decades. I think there is 1 that actually pulled on a person and that was home intruder. I my self have around 15 years carrying and have never pulled but some how this dude has used his gun 4 or 5 times as a civilian in roughly 25 years?
Nope. Nope. Nope.
Replies (5)
If you can't control your ego, you shouldn't have a firearm
7 likes@The PineApple definitely seems like he had an ego.
5 likesI am kind of surprised that after 4 or 5 times being involved in road rage cases that included his gun they didn't revoke his concealed license/permit.
Maybe I am just good at avoiding confrontation but I don't believe I have ever been in a road rage incident that goes further than getting cut off and having someone flip the bird.
This goes way beyond simple ego. You have to have a twisted mind to seek an opportunity to put a hole through someone with the intent to murder.
1 likePlenty of people get pissed easily. Many more are way too prideful. But to let it get the better of you to kill someone without cause, and also seek to avoid taking responsibility for your actions? Evil.
@No Fux Who was that directed at?
0 likes@No Fux never said I was better.
2 likesI might have better de-escalation ability. Might have more situational awareness. Might have better common sense. Probably better training.
But I didn't say I was better than him.
20 minutes?
0 likesWTF!
3 likesCrazy
0 likesWhy did they need a Buccal swab for a shooting.
0 likesNot once in my entire life have I even remotely considered getting on someone’s patreon but today is the day that changes. I’m officially addicted and ive burned through all your vids.
360 likesReplies (24)
SAME 🙋🏽♀️
1 likeSammmmmmmeeeeeeeee!!!
2 likesCONCUR
2 likesSame:) Polish boy :)
1 likeRight, you use the term "vids" but today is the first day you consider Patreon...mmkay. Sounds a bit paid off to me.
1 likeExactly what I thought, and exactly what I did two months ago. Utterly worth it...
1 likeThe only Patreon I’ve ever joined is JCS! He is brilliant and I can’t wait to watch him have his on show on the ID Channel someday or something! He’s brilliant!
2 likes@Molly Mellinger
8 likesLol, what a ridiculous comment.
@Molly Mellinger yeah just wondering what you meant about the term "vids" what did that imply to you
3 likesDid you join Jim's patreon? I honestly would if that video at the beginning with the guy saying I didn't do it is there
1 likeIt's worth it.
0 likesSounds like he got you hook line and sinker. Gave u a taste and now your hooked. Luckily its JCS criminal psychology videos and not Jake Paul videos
1 likeSame tho
0 likesHow do I become a patreon??
1 likeDebbie Pendleton there is a link in the video description. You pay a dollar a month for it I think. It’s worth it.
1 likeAlex Friedman How is Patreon immoral?
0 likesMolly Mellinger what?
0 likesSame! 😃
0 likesHelen Maeve Smith it's worth it for a month but he doesn't have lots more videos but yeah some more on there are good. It's only a buck def worth that
0 likesHelen Maeve Smith - JCS is the only person i support on patreon
1 likeIt's not worth it. He's got 33,982 patreons. So he;s making $33,000 a month and in total on his channel he's got 24 videos. And I'm one of his Patreon subscribers. You're earning boatloads so make boatloads of videos!
0 likes@mweil1 He has several more videos on his Patreon. That's the point. A lot of this type of content is restricted or demonitized on YouTube so by paying as little as a dollar a month you have so much more of his content.
0 likesMe too 🙋♀️
0 likesLike I said, he's got 24 videos on his patreon, I've watched them all. They're good, but for the amount of money he's making, he should be making wayyyyy more videos.
0 likes27:10
0 likesim so glad this guy is locked up for 20 years
0 likes😳 WATCH MIKES FINGERS ?
0 likes