I am disabled veteran. I have a handicap placard.  Sometimes I use it and at times I don't.  It all depends on how much I hurt that day. I see cars park in the handicap parking all the time. I would never confront a person for doing this to avoid what happened in this video. I would rather limp a little further to get to my destination. I've seen enough blood for one life time. With that said I do believe in protecting myself or anyone else. A fine line I try to avoid at all cost.

@Cobalt360Degrees Did the other guy not shove Dreyka onto the concrete?

@Cobalt360Degrees
I mean...fuck, dude. All that fella actually said was that parking in a disabled spot is wrong. It's not like the dude was dancing on anyone's graves. Do you really think that acknowledging that parking there was wrong suddenly means he's comparing an illegal park with murder? That's kinda fucking dumb, dude. He explicitly said that dude A did something wrong and didn't deserve to die for it, right?

Pretty fucking weak, my dude.

probably smart. I'd avoid people who park illegally in handicapped spots too. I'd assume they were bad and dangerous people to begin with. If they dont care about the disabled, they sure wouldnt give a damn about the safety of people around them.

@Kira Py'romantic <br>I saw a really depressing documentary a little while ago and a young guy (about 20?) with terminal cancer was relentlessly harassed by strangers, even though he had disabled plates on his car. He even went so far as to carry around a signed note from his doctor confirming his terminal diagnosis. People are arseholes.

@Kira Py'romantic
I saw a really depressing documentary a little while ago and a young guy (about 20?) with terminal cancer was relentlessly harassed by strangers, even though he had disabled plates on his car. He even went so far as to carry around a signed note from his doctor confirming his terminal diagnosis. People are arseholes.

@Patroclus <br>But I also don't think that individuals should be demonised for being in the armed forces. It's, unfortunately, really not up to them what horrific shit show they're going to be expected to involve themselves in.

@Patroclus
But I also don't think that individuals should be demonised for being in the armed forces. It's, unfortunately, really not up to them what horrific shit show they're going to be expected to involve themselves in.

Dude awesome. Thank you so much for serving.

@TransRoofKorean My boy here would look at that dad who killed his child for eating his father's day cake and unironically say "everyone in this altercation was wrong in their actions, and a whole bunch of lives got ruined for it" lmao

The black guy took a running start and pushed him hard from behind, gave him whiplash and then was looking at him like, what's up!??? Pulled up his shorts again and was ready to fight, waiting for him to get up so he can punch him.

So to say that guy was the victim is ridiculous. I am a liberal but I am so tired of people on both sides not being objective and honest.

I don't know, something is wrong wegen you live in a country where you constantly think about life and death.

thank you for serving, hope it gets better

OK...! I'm 74 year old man, got a really beat-up set of legs...I could get a 'Card' but just let it go to others who need it more...I can just walk a hundred feet more, like I did at CostCo yesterday....still funny to see able-bodied people 'circling' the parking lot, waiting for a closer space to the store.

@Cobalt360Degrees I don't think your comprehension skills are too good.

Iv used a placard on and off depending how I feel that day. I also would never feel the need to confront someone that I just felt was being selfish or lazy. Maybe they just didn’t notice. It’s not the crime of the century

@LeciPeci because teaching your son that you can do whatever you want and treat people however you want is a great lesson. I'm sure the kid is better off without this wonderful role model

Nowhere near the same circumstances as you, but I agree that there is absolutely no reason to escalate such a trivial interaction to the point of a confrontation let alone a fatal confrontation.

@TransRoofKorean can’t convince the delusional

@TransRoofKorean you absolutely implied they were equal, apparently not intentionally. But no point in arguing with the delusional.

Thank you for your service. God bless you.

Ive had disabled friends who have been harassed even having a handicap placard. Its actually becoming a pretty common thing

@Patroclus i think i miscommunicated my point, i totally agree with you, american history tends to idolize meaningless wars and say that it provided freedom when in reality it fueled fear. i meant to show that i respect this person for putting their life on the line because though i haven’t seen death, i have PTSD from past trauma and  couldn’t imagine how much more scarring it would be to have to be to fight on the field<br>(i was diagnosed btw)

@Patroclus i think i miscommunicated my point, i totally agree with you, american history tends to idolize meaningless wars and say that it provided freedom when in reality it fueled fear. i meant to show that i respect this person for putting their life on the line because though i haven’t seen death, i have PTSD from past trauma and  couldn’t imagine how much more scarring it would be to have to be to fight on the field
(i was diagnosed btw)

@gothic_ratboi I respect the individual on a certain level for putting their life on the line. But let's not create a narrative that they've given freedom to their country in regards to wars and conflicts where that was never in contention. <br>Very few service people outside of say the second world war have ever fought for anything remotely meaningful. They deserve pity, but they shouldn't be honoured as custodians of freedom when that is far from the truth.

@gothic_ratboi I respect the individual on a certain level for putting their life on the line. But let's not create a narrative that they've given freedom to their country in regards to wars and conflicts where that was never in contention.
Very few service people outside of say the second world war have ever fought for anything remotely meaningful. They deserve pity, but they shouldn't be honoured as custodians of freedom when that is far from the truth.

i think everyone should be held accountable for their actions, but shouldn’t be shamed for their actions as long as they are willing to learn and grow

@Patroclus unfortunately that is an issue and nothing can replace a human life but fear and trauma is a thing that can twist the mind so terribly that even the most logical solution or the most morally correct solution is ignored.<br>I’m certainly not proud of my country’s history, though i’d like to have faith in people no matter what they’ve done as long as they have humanity

@Patroclus unfortunately that is an issue and nothing can replace a human life but fear and trauma is a thing that can twist the mind so terribly that even the most logical solution or the most morally correct solution is ignored.
I’m certainly not proud of my country’s history, though i’d like to have faith in people no matter what they’ve done as long as they have humanity

@Grimm Reaper another disabled vet here. Glad to have both of y’all back at home brotha!

@TransRoofKorean To even suggest that parking in the handicap spot and killing another human being are even in the same <b>stratosphere</b> of wrong is completely dehumanizing the victim and the situation, are you insane.

@TransRoofKorean To even suggest that parking in the handicap spot and killing another human being are even in the same *stratosphere* of wrong is completely dehumanizing the victim and the situation, are you insane.

@TransRoofKorean Kay but shooting someone and killing them in front of their children unnecessarily should give you a *little more pause than parking in a handicap spot. I get what you’re saying, but no.

But there is another point to be had here:  everyone in this altercation was wrong in their actions, and a whole bunch of lives got ruined for it.
Even just parking in the handicap spot should make you question yourself, "should I really be doing this?"

But there is another point to be had here:  *everyone* in this altercation was wrong in their actions, and a whole bunch of lives got ruined for it.
Even just parking in the handicap spot should make you question yourself, "should I really be doing this?"

thank you for serving, and thank you for facing horrors so my generation didn’t have to. I really do appreciate it and i hope you’re doing well!

I can’t imagine what you’ve seen but as a person who suffers from PTSD I understand how hard it is to live with, much love to you 🥰


Wtf kills a man in cold blood and they gave him a bond….. wtf 🤬


Every right comes with a responsibility. As someone concealed carrying you have a responsibility not to instigate situations that could escalate to physical confrontations. He should have minded his own business.

Gsfbffx Pdhhdf Good, thanks to his right to free speech, he talked himself into a jail cell for 20 years.

@Gsfbffx Pdhhdf And he got 20 years of that sweet, sweet freedom

Saphirefenix nope u can talk all u want its a free country


I did notice when Michael pulled up, there were parking spots open along the entire front of the building-(much closer to the door) but he choose to pull in right next to their car instead-which certainly shows he wasn't just 'shopping' but in reality, he was just looking for trouble and a fight.

Bill nalder<br>He didn't park in a space. That corner where he parked, was not a parking space. They were in a disabled space, but he chose to park illegally so that his car was closer to hers. He drove up to her car, illegally parked, got out and circled the car, then went up to the window, and then from the video, he seemingly started yelling at her. The man comes out and sees some random dude is screaming at his wife, and so he shoves angry gun guy. That was a bad idea, but I get it. Angry gun guy saw his opportunity to shoot up a black man, assuming that nobody would give two fucks. That was really, really bad idea.

Bill nalder
He didn't park in a space. That corner where he parked, was not a parking space. They were in a disabled space, but he chose to park illegally so that his car was closer to hers. He drove up to her car, illegally parked, got out and circled the car, then went up to the window, and then from the video, he seemingly started yelling at her. The man comes out and sees some random dude is screaming at his wife, and so he shoves angry gun guy. That was a bad idea, but I get it. Angry gun guy saw his opportunity to shoot up a black man, assuming that nobody would give two fucks. That was really, really bad idea.

@Judy Wright the "protecting his family' quote was in regards to the victim running to the aid of his wife during the confrontation to with Michael.

bill nalder ——He mentioned ‘protecting his family’, I’m kinda thinking he lives w/his elderly mom and he has some way of knowing when someone parks in that spot, as if that’s his job.

@No Name haha, im sorry, im usually good at that, my apologies sir!

it was his spot for him because it was his shop.. hes there every day


You just know this little man had been waiting for this his whole life. Unfortunately for him he didn’t end up as the superhero he was in his head.

@Doll face oh honey, i know the skinny queen 👑

I call this scenario “ the conservative wet dream”

Exactly what I was thinking. He obviously always had his gun on him to be ready to pull it out and use it. And I could imagine he was provoking confrontation all the time simply to justify using his gun. Not with equal opponents though, always weaker, unarmed people because he’s a coward.

he was waiting for this moment so he could post it on reddit and get good boy points

This guy gives me this vibe aswell. Feels like he’s been looking to get a “legal” kill for a while and finally saw an opportunity.

Too bad for him, the PD where he lives actually does its job.


This is irrelevant, but this dude slightly sounds like tobey maguire when he says somethings


Woman shouldn’t have parked her car in the handicap spot. Her bf shouldn’t have blindsided this guy. This guy should not have shot the bf. Everyone in this situation is wrong. That being said, the shooter definitely belongs in prison.


Yeah.  Subtitles would help instead the random odd line here and there.


St. Matthew 5 And seeing the multitudes, He went up into a mountain, and when he was set down, his disciples came unto him.

2 And opening his mouth, he taught them, saying:

3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

4 Blessed are the meek: for they shall possess the land.

5 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.

6 Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice and righteousness: for they shall have their fill.

7 Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.

8 Blessed are the clean and pure of heart: for they shall see Lord God, the King.

9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called children of Lord God, the King.

10 Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

11 Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake:

12 Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. For so they persecuted the prophets that were before you.

13 You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt lose its savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is good for nothing any more but to be cast out, and to be trodden on by men.

14 You are the light of the world. A city seated on a mountain cannot be hid.

15 Neither do men light a candle and put it under a bushel, but upon a candlestick, that it may shine to all that are in the house.

16 So let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father Lord God, the King who is in heaven.

17 Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.

18 For amen I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot, or one tittle shall not pass of the law, till all be fulfilled.

19 He therefore that shall break one of these least commandments, and shall so teach men, shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven. But he that shall do and teach, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

20 For I tell you, that unless your justice and righteousness abound more than that of the scribes and Pharisees, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

21 You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not murder. And whosoever shall murder shall be in danger of the judgment.

22 But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou Fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

23 If therefore thou offer thy gift at the altar, and there thou remember that thy brother hath any thing against thee;

24 Leave there thy offering before the altar, and go first to be reconciled to thy brother: and then coming thou shalt offer thy gift.

25 Be at agreement with thy adversary betimes, whilst thou art in the way with him: lest perhaps the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.

26 Amen I say to thee, thou shalt not go out from thence till thou repay the last farthing.

27 You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not commit adultery.

28 But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.

29 And if thy right eye scandalize thee, pluck it out and cast it from thee. For it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell.

30 And if thy right hand scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell.

31 And it hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a bill of divorce.

32 But I say to you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, excepting for the cause of fornication, maketh her to commit adultery: and he that shall marry her that is put away, committeth adultery.

33 Again you have heard that it was said to them of old, Thou shalt not forswear thyself: but thou shalt perform thy oaths to the Lord God, the King.

34 But I say to you not to swear at all, neither by heaven, for it is the throne of Lord God, the King:

35 Nor by the earth, for it is his footstool: nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great king:

36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

38 You have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.

39 But I say to you not to resist evil: but if one strike thee on thy right cheek, turn to him also the other:

40 And if a man will contend with thee in judgment, and take away thy coat, let go thy cloak also unto him.

41 And whosoever will force thee one mile, go with him other two,

42 Give to him that asketh of thee and from him that would borrow of thee turn not away.

43 You have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thy enemy.

44 But I say to you, Holy Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you:

45 That you may be the children of your Father Lord God, the King who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust.

46 For if you love them that love you, what reward shall you have? do not even the publicans this?

47 And if you salute your brethren only, what do you more? do not also the heathens this?

48 Be you therefore holy perfect, as also your holy heavenly Father Lord God, the King is perfect.


Since the dawn of time I'm sure men have pushed other men, especially when their woman is being harassed for a stupid reason. Is that grounds to kill someone? His life wasn't in danger. He needed to mind his p's qnd q's and walk away after being pushed.


42:24 why does the prosecution looks familiar to current FIDE  Russian President


Revelation 18 And after these things, I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power: and the earth was enlightened with his glory.

2 And he cried out with a strong voice, saying: Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen; and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every unclean spirit, and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird:

3 Because all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication; and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her; and the merchants of the earth have been made rich by the power of her delicacies.

4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues.

5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and the Lord God hath remembered her iniquities.

6 Render to her as she also hath rendered to you; and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup wherein she hath mingled, mingle ye double unto her.

7 As much as she hath glorified herself, and lived in delicacies, so much torment and sorrow give ye to her; because she saith in her heart: I sit a queen, and am no widow; and sorrow I shall not see.

8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine, and she shall be burnt with the fire; because Lord God is strong, who shall judge her.

9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication, and lived in delicacies with her, shall weep, and bewail themselves over her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning:

10 Standing afar off for fear of her torments, saying: Alas! alas! that great city Babylon, that mighty city: for in one hour is thy judgment come.

11 And the merchants of the earth shall weep, and mourn over her: for no man shall buy their merchandise any more.

12 Merchandise of gold and silver, and precious stones; and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner of vessels of ivory, and all manner of vessels of precious stone, and of brass, and of iron, and of marble,

13 And cinnamon, and odours, and ointment, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.

14 And the fruits of the desire of thy soul are departed from thee, and all fat and goodly things are perished from thee, and they shall find them no more at all.

15 The merchants of these things, who were made rich, shall stand afar off from her, for fear of her torments, weeping and mourning.

16 And saying: Alas! alas! that great city, which was clothed with fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and was gilt with gold, and precious stones, and pearls.

17 For in one hour are so great riches come to nought; and every shipmaster, and all that sail into the lake, and mariners, and as many as work in the sea, stood afar off.

18 And cried, seeing the place of her burning, saying: What city is like to this great city?

19 And they cast dust upon their heads, and cried, weeping and mourning, saying: Alas! alas! that great city, wherein all were made rich, that had ships at sea, by reason of her prices: for in one hour she is made desolate.

20 Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for Lord God hath judged your judgment on her.

21 And a mighty angel took up a stone, as it were a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying: With such violence as this shall Babylon, that great city, be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.

22 And the voice of harpers, and of musicians, and of them that play on the pipe, and on the trumpet, shall no more be heard at all in thee; and no craftsman of any art whatsoever shall be found any more at all in thee; and the sound of the mill shall be heard no more at all in thee;

23 And the light of the lamp shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth, for all nations have been deceived by thy enchantments.

24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.


This wouldn’t have happened if Karen was minding his business smh


Doesn't look like self-defense to me. It looked like he got pissed off that a black man pushed him to the ground, so he shot him

that's exactly what I thought too. even if the man hadn't died, a person who will shoot to kill just for fear of his ass getting "moderately" kicked, I do not think someone like that should be left out to his own devices. he's clearly got a few screws loose.

Also, that defense attorney must have huge hands to be grasping at so many straws


Trim trees for 15 years and then retire for the rest of your life?


39:08 this is the best cleanest pleasure!!! So glad this pile of crap is sad..boo hoo


What happened to Mr Funny Hair during the final statement?


Can you read me a bed time story please?


The audio on this is terrible and could've been adjusted with basic video editing software


he reminds me of some pathetic character from Deadwood.. maybe the guy who shot wild bill in the back.. idk


While the guy shouldn’t have pushed him the guy who was pushed shouldn’t have shot him over that


Umm... what's up with the white shirt dude with the hair sitting in the courtroom behind the prosecutor? He looks dead. 48:02


Lesson learned here:  Fuck society.  If you see someone doing something wrong, just walk away.


He pulled out a gun on a women with her 2 children???


Why was the handicap parking not right up front?


All hand posture and i can’t shake hand normally is act !!! Obviously just for inducing the idea I am hurt ! This man is a failure as human being!


"No reason to go overboard."

You shot and killed someone, my dude, that ship has sailed.


Two years old video, five comments, looks like YouTube strikes again


“Don’t start no sh*t, there won’t be no sh*t” Gandhi


This dude was looking for any excuse to shoot a person.


The way he pretended his arm was hurt is just about the worse acting I've ever seen.

It reminds me of when kids get in trouble for fighting and start playing up their injuries to seem like the other is in the wrong, but eventually becomes like a badge of honour. Like a “yeah… my arm really hurts, I’m a tough though so it’s not a big deal”

@Jake Jason Does it go from being broken to not broken depending on who's watching you?

even if your arm is broken you can move it what are you talking about


Yet another reason to stay out of florida.


LoL he didnt wanna get punched in the face bc he cant fight


When you don’t follow rules and put hands on another man , what you think gonna happen???

@Herbert West lol how is the guy being aggressive he just ask why you parked on the wheelchair execrable  parking spot. Instead of just moving you wait for your husband to take it physical and the guy protect himself

You learn from as young as kindergarten what an appropriate response to physical provocation is. You can't murder someone for pushing you over, especially if you're the one who initiated the confrontation by acting aggressively and threatening towards a man's wife and small children.

Mike, you internet time is up for the week. Back to pre


And this is why guns should be outlawed to the public


I am totally against and outraged at every action this guy took from beginning to end. Being handicapped myself and requiring the handicapped spot, I still get confronted by people like this guy who wants to challenge why I’m parking in the spot. One time I forgot to put the placard out and had some guy get in my face about stealing the spot and being lazy, etc. I then told him I’m a veteran, I’ve had 5 surgeries and more hardware in my body than he had in his shopping cart. He then apologized and said “thanks for your service and reached his hand out to shake mine.  I then told him to go eff himself. People should just mind their own business. There are times I use the spots when I’m feeling terrible, and there are times I don’t use it and want to walk in the store like everyone else. To people watching this video and empathizing with this guy because they take the same position as he does - which is confronting people and not minding their own business - use this POS as a warning to you. You have no right to challenge anyone just because you feel like you’re entitled to. People, even if they are wrong by mistakenly or on purposefully parking in the wrong spot, have the same rights as you do. MIND YOUR OWN FREAKIN BUSINESS and keep your noses where they belong. If you’re a police officer on duty, that’s one thing.  But if you’re a private citizen that’s quite another. This guy got exactly what he deserved for not minding his own business. And to the family of this gentleman that was merely protecting his wife, I am terribly sorry for your loss. I stand with you!


Bottom line both men were wrong. The man that shoved him to the ground was wrong to put hands on him. And this guy's response was inproportionate. On the flip side of that;the guy that shoved him ha@to know that there are people like this out there. I'm not blaming the victim here I'm just saying that he bares some of the responsibility here. But in the end the verdict was correct.

@James Mel bares "SOME" of the responsibility here. If you are going to comment and quote the other person's comment you at least need to be cognitive enough to get it right.plus you cherry picked a portion of it to try and make a point that quite frankly is moot if you leave out portions of the comment that are key components in what the person is saying.

“I’m not blaming the victim here” … “[the victim] bares responsibility here”. This is cognitive dissonance. Does someone deserve to die because they shoved you?


Lesson from this channel: don’t say a word before speaking to your lawyer

Nope Jeff made the rules
1) ask him if you are under arrest, if no leave, if yes
2) what am I under arrest for?
3) what is the evidence against me
4) ask to be taken to the cell
5) ask for coke and pizza if they want to talk
6) tell him you know what he is doing trying to make you  say incriminating stuff
7) ask him if they are playing good cop, tell him he is a prick.
8) only say simple facts about the time of arrest and repeat them a million times like I was just walking home when you guys assaulted me.
9) don't discuss the crime itself,
10) keep taking shots at the police

I think speaking to a lawyer should be automatic, people don't really understand their rights when they agree to talk. Not speaking to a lawyer should be an opt-out type of thing.

@bert wert As a European it makes sense. Pushing someone to the ground, gives him a significant disadvantage.<br>Someone with a gun is especially in danger. I can even see justification for shooting him.

@bert wert As a European it makes sense. Pushing someone to the ground, gives him a significant disadvantage.
Someone with a gun is especially in danger. I can even see justification for shooting him.

FACTS! 💯 <br>Innocent or not… Don’t give a statement or talk to police / investigators without an attorney present.

FACTS! 💯
Innocent or not… Don’t give a statement or talk to police / investigators without an attorney present.

@Panagiotis Manologlou In this case yes, but that doesnt rule out all possibilties of actual selfdefense.

@Guyin Apocket that's why it would've been better if he didn't carry one in the first place.

@Prius Girl 🧚♂ That seems logical, but someone who honestly thinks they did nothing wrong would want to speak to the police to, in their minds, clear the air about what happened. In that situation refusing to talk to the police would seem suspicious. I believe this guy still to this day thinks he was in the right.

Dude, that's the scariest part of all these videos!! The lunatics REALLY think they're gna walk away from this shit with their spectacular skills in manipulation

thats because this man really didn't think he didn't anything wrong. In his mind, he was completely justified. "Man pushed me, I shot man. Oh well" He didn't even care if he knew he killed the guy because he didn't see anything wrong

@FallenSully That's what I say. If the police start asking questions I would ask if I was under arrest. If they say no then I would leave. If I'm under arrest then I get my lawyer. Never talk to the police!

It amazes me even after they are read their rights they decide to talk away.

Or better yet just walk away if you aren’t under arrest. Don’t give them anything if you don’t have to.

@bert wert yeah you don’t speak on behalf of all Europeans, I’m afraid I must disagree

@Guyin Apocket Yep, that's how I see it.  Grab the gun to get the assaulter to back off...which he did.  But that guy was LARPing and had to pull the trigger.

@bert wert Why? It makes sense to me as a european. If this isnt the time to grab a gun when is it then? Firing after the guy would charge (which didnt happen) makes sense too. But he obviously did a terrible mistake in firing at a retreating man

The actual lesson: don’t park on a handicap spot cuz you might get killed by a psycho.(bruh...as a european im totally confused how the prosecuter says he was even in his right to grab the gun after he got pushed).

i think the wildest thing is the suspect never notices the change in questions that it starts becoming about the person talking and not the events.


No offense to whoever that deffence lawyer is but he needs to get a new job. He just gives off villain vibes, he sounds like hes trying to manipulate the jury and judge.


Terrible defense attorney 🤦🏽♂ it’s not in HD 🤧😂


This guy cries over some dogs but doesn't cry over his wife being left behind or the children who lost their father for no reason...or the woman who lost her husband.


I would have done the same thing , after being assaulted and shoved to the ground its not because the guy backed that he is not a treat anymore , specially since while backing up he kept his hands down and could have easily pulled a gun , we see it in many police shootout videos , a man being held at gun point by officers and get blown away for having their hands doing sketchy stuff

Also ,Its not because you know that you can provoke an altercation that its excuse the fact that he got assaulted ... wtf is that argument

That video just shows one thing , what ever you get arrested for either if you did the right or wrong thing, dont talk to the police. They can only make things work for you , they are not there to help you

AND DONT TALK TO REPORTERS


The fact that this dude straight up murdered someone and is still more concerned about the handicapping spot than he is about the life he took is just awful

@David Reeding good description I like it

Hes a cop in his imaginary world, so he's just doing his imaginary job.


That lawyer was laughably terrible lolool


His defense lawyers voice... need mute button. Lol


The lawyer has a stupid point about the camera footage. Who cares that the camera is standard quality and doesn't show saturated colors. As far as I am concerned, a dude backing away without color is still a dude backing away.

The lawyer saw the interrogation and was like FFS MAN we gotta pull some elaborate shit from our arse...and then failed hahaha

@Crusader1089 I don't think he was arguing that the drejka should've aimed for a non-lethal area, he was saying that the shot was perfect, which would be much harder to do and less likely to happen if he truly thought his life was in immediate danger and was injured like he claimed.

@Alec I never once mentioned race.  If you hear the word "thug" and immediately think "black person," then YOU are the racist.

@Alec I never once mentioned race.  If you hear the word "thug" and immediately think "black person," then YOU are the racist.

@Porkchop Periwinkle Like I said in my previous comment. It doesn't matter that Drejka was pushed from behind. Like a normal person he should have assumed from the start that the other person was unarmed unless he had found reasonable counter observations that the guy was armed. As long as there's no indication that someone is armed you should assume the person won't use lethal force against you. And the guy wasn't even in punching range from him when Drejka finally shot. Drejak should first have assessed the situation before shooting, which he either negligently or deliberately didn't do. Either of which would lend him a guilty verdict since his gross negligence would still lend him a damning case. You can say "oh but it was in the spur of  a heated moment" but you lose your freedom of acting in the spur of the moment the moment you bought your gun since that's the moment you became obligated to not recklessly use your firearm.

I dont get why a jury of average people get to make these decisions, there are so many people convinced by stupid defense like that. Its basically giving regular schmucks to be manipulated when a judge can make an informed opinion.

He absolutely infuriated me, especially with the part where he said "a man's life has been taken, don't take another man's life away", maybe no lives would be fucked if Michael minded his own business or EVEN BETTER hadn't killed the poor guy!!! now he needs to pay for his actions

Now my family is wondering why I am laughing at 6 in the morning like I am mental.

Now my family is wondering why I am laughing at 6 in the morning like I am mental.

@Lily Ka's Vegan garden, Completely agree with you, I’m very happy this dude ended up in jail. But I do think it was wrong that the father shoved this guy. He could of confronted him in a verbal manner and not a physical one. But that does not mean this dude should of shot his aggressor. Especially since he backed up as soon as he pulled out his gun.

@Porkchop Periwinkle The deceased pushing Drejka is indeed an excessive response as long as Drejka wasn't threatening the victim, which indeed we don't know and would have a decent chance on landing the victim an assault case depending on the circumstances (Depends typically on the state laws, police & how hurt Drejka would have gotten if he had fallen to the ground). This however doesn't mean the shooting from Drejka wasn't an excessive response either  and therefore excessive self-defence. A counter response can also be excessive and since lethal force weighs far heavier than non-lethal force the victim would most likely be aquitted if he had survived the shooting since the jury would most likely not find him guilty. The fact that the victim pushed as you said "Drejka into combat"(although I'm personally of the opinion that simply pushing someone doesn't already constitute a fight) doesn't mean this gives Drejka a free card to push the situation into deadly combat. So even though you argue that the victim is also in the wrong this doesn't negate that Drejka is guilty. This would only be applicable on the length of his sentence, not whether he'd get a sentence.

@Porkchop Periwinkle one, Drejka was shoved from the side, not from behind. Two you can't provide any law whatsoever that makes it illegal to shove someone away from yourself or your family if they are threatening them and you genuinely perceive them to be a danger to yourself and/or your family due to their threats. Three, no matter how you try to deflect and pass blame, even if this shove was an assault, it didn't give Drejka the right to then shoot the victim, because there was no further physical force used by the victim, and he was literally retreating when shot.  You act like you care so much about the law, yet you can't even process the fact that this wasn't a justified shooting, even with stark video evidence, and a guilty verdict.

@Porkchop Periwinkle sorry but no, there are absolutely situations where it's ok to shove someone away from yourself or other people based on verbal threats. If someone comes up to you in a public place and begins threatening you and or your family for example, if you shove them away it's not necessarily a case of assault, it can be viewed as an act of self defense. You're assuming that in order to push someone away from yourself or your family they need to touch you first, this simply isn't true. And the scenarios I'm putting forth could absolutely apply to the case, because we don't know what Drejka said, there's no audio recording of the confrontation. Drejka literally has a history of threatening others in road rage incidents, with his gun, and you're going to pretend it's beyond the realm of possibility that he threatened these people in this case? How fucking dishonest can you get.

@Turquoise Cheetah actually it very much depends on what was being said. Freedom of speech doesn't apply to threatening someone. If Drejka was making threatening comments while standing in such close proximity to the victim's family, he would be absolutely within his rights to push Drejka away. So no, it isn't automatically an assault charge, it very much depends on the circumstances. For example what if Drejka had said something like "if you don't move this car I've got the firepower to fucking make you move it", or made some other reference to getting violent towards her or the child involved. In such a case the victim would absolutely be within his rights to push Drejka away from his family. On the other hand it could also be an assualt depending on what exactly was said and how Drejka was behaving, but even so it doesn't matter, Drejka still had no right to shoot the man, which is why he's in jail.

@Porkchop Periwinkle And you might say "well Drejka didn't know if the victim did or didn't have a gun". But if there is no indication of a gun or knife you should always start out from the assumption that the other person is unarmed. Because you as the armed person start out from a position of power against unarmed people and hold a responsibility to not use your weapon recklessly. You clearly haven't seriously studied the law so please stop talking from ignorance.

@Porkchop Periwinkle Guy, there's a term called excessive self-defence. Which basically means that you shouldn't punch someone in the face because of a shoulder pat, or shoot them because of being pushed. This is also brought up in the "The case of Michael Dunn" video on this channel. To narrow it down to when guns are in the picture you could generally say that you don't have the right to seriously harm or kill someone with a firearm when attacked/threatened as long as there's not enough  reason to believe that the other party is actually capable of doing serious harm themselves. To apply this rule on this case. Since the victim was unarmed and therefore unable to seriously harm Drejka he didn't have enough reason to shoot the victim. Especially because the victim wasn't advancing towards Drejka.

@Steven Gomez I'm glad you love it.  I love your false equivalency.  Smooches.

@Steven Gomez I'm glad you love it.  I love your false equivalency.  Smooches.

@Porkchop Periwinkle haha, yeah you're right, Drejka isn't rotting in jail, he's on some beach somewhere sipping a nice cocktail. Jesus you trolls get more delusional every day.

@Porkchop Periwinkle one, he pushed him from the side, not from behind. Two depending on the situation and what is being said, you absolutely can legally push someone who is verbally harrassing your wife. Two it doesn't matter even if the push was an unjustified assault, that doesn't give Drejka the right to execute a man in cold blood, which is why he's in jail.

@Andrew I totally agree, the shooter clearly had to know he could trigger a confrontation by verbally harrassing a woman and her children in a public place. As a gun carrier you have an increased responsibility to avoid creating any type of conflict, you absolutely cannot just go around picking fights and then shooting anyone who responds in a way that you don't like.

It’s just the defendant’s attorney looking for literally any excuse at all to use to “prove” his client’s “innocence.”

It’s just the defendant’s attorney looking for literally any excuse at all to use to “prove” his client’s “innocence.”

@Raverly G But he didn't continue to attack, and he was backing away, which is why the shooter is in jail. Sorry but the possibility that someone might attack, when they are not in the process of attacking, and in fact are retreating, isn't grounds to execute them.

I think the lawyer’s biggest mistake was his tone.  He sounds condescending af, like he thinks he’s talking to a bunch of morons.

I was stunned when I saw the lawyer's argues that nonsense about the allegedly poor quality of the footage (which, for the purpose of the prosecution's case, was good enough). Quibbling about the quality of the footage? Really?! In such a case the entire focus of the defence should be on one thing and one thing alone: the self-defence argument.

SD video footage is the only real defence they had left.

SD video footage is the only real defence they had left.

@Steven Gomez and again, you totally downplay the actions of the shooter, and attack the victim. The victim in this case did not start the altercation either, the shooter did. Anyone with half a brain knows that if you randomly start a verbal altercation with a woman in public, there's a significant chance you're going to anger her spouse or significant other who may be nearby, and yet you place no responsibility for starting the altercation on the shooter. And given the shooter's clear lack of judgement in this case, how can you be sure he wouldn't have ended up shooting the woman if the victim hadn't intervened and shoved him away? We also don't know what the shooter was saying to the woman, if he was being verbally threatening, then again, the victim would have had every right, both morally and legally, to push him away. Yet you act as if you know for certain the victim was morally wrong, when you don't even know key info on the case. Whether the victim was right or wrong for shoving the shooter, his act was at worse a misdemeanor, and should have been handled by law enforcement, what he did in no way warranted him being shot.

@Steven Gomez Sorry but shoving someone isn't grounds to be shot in cold blood, which is why the shooter is in jail. It's sick that you don't care at all about someone actually dying, but you're all bent out of shape over someone being shoved?

@Lily Ka's Vegan garden exactly, this guy had pulled his gun in road rage incidents multiple times before, he shouldn't have been allowed to legally carry. And yes, I'm sure if the races of the people in this shooting were reversed, these people would be calling the shooter a thug, and calling the victim a hero for defending his family. It's sick.

b gilley I agree. And his face when the policeman told him that HIS victim was dead. He didn’t care AT ALL.

He knew from the beginning that going towards a person and asking this person justification for whatever reason knowing he was NO ONE could have turned ugly. But he felt safe BECAUSE he had a gun. It is normal for him to go towards someone LESS than 21 feet from this person (when he went to the window of the woman’s car and even in front of her car), but when someone does the same : he has to shoot for his own safety. Wtf?
Even if the victim had kicked him or whatever (and it didn’t happen), it was not a reason to be killed.

AND it is said it’s not the first time his doing it. He was used to provoke people and show his gun when people got mad at HIS BEHAVIOUR!
If it was not for this family, this incident would have happen someday.

I can’t get how those people in the comments can defend a trash like him...
That guy belongs to jail. I hope he’s gonna be rotting there for life. He’s dangerous.

@James O'Blivion exactly, I don't understand why these people think that any physical confrontation automatically justifies a lethal response. It's scary to think that some of these same people are probably walking around armed. If the victim in this case had tried to beat the shooter while he was on the ground, then maybe a shooting would be justified. In this case though the victim was backing away and was executed in cold blood. Look at the way the shooter tracks him with his gun when he's running into the store, this is not the action of a man who's not in control of his actions.

@b gilley Nah, the THUG who violently shoved the real victim is the one who initiated it.  People are allowed to peacefully speak to other people, which is what the victim was doing when he was wrongfully attacked by the now dead thug.

He got shot within half a second of starting to back away, which wasn't enough time for the shooter to decide to risk his own life by allowing that thug to continue his attack.  The THUG was indeed continuing to advance toward the shooter to continue the violent assault, and only STARTED to back away when the gun was pulled.  The shooter was justified in fearing for his life.

@Mark Farmer pushing someone away who is harrassing your wife and children isn't grounds to be killed, which is why the shooter is in prison. If the victim had pushed the shooter and then proceeded to continue attacking him, it might be a different story, but that's not what happened.

A dude backing away after assaulting another man and realizing his victim has an equalizer.

A dude backing away after assaulting another man and realizing his victim has an equalizer.

That was his best defense there was literally nothing the lawyer couldve done

That was his best defense there was literally nothing the lawyer couldve done

Attorneys aren't required to always get their defendant off scot-free.  Their duty is to provide the fairest trial possible.  If that means grainy footage comes into question, then he has a responsibility to make that argument, however silly.

@drysoup I second this.
It is the very nature of the US legal system, known as the adversarial system, to work in this way: A lawyer has a duty to give the best possible case for their client, and we have two lawyers to make the best possible for and against case. THAT then goes to an independent jury to decide guilt based on those arguments. THAT then goes to an experienced legal expert, the judge, to determine an appropriate sentence.

It can "feel" like a defence lawyer is protecting evil people if you assume someone is guilty, but the defence lawyer is part of the system to ensure justice and every part must do their best to ensure justice comes out the other end.

It is a foundational statement in US justice that is better to let ten guilty men go free than to punish an innocent man (Black Stone's ratio from Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765 and inherited by the US legal system) and that is why the defence lawyer must make the best possible case. To do anything else, literally any thing less than their very best, is to fail their duty to their client, to the citizens of the USA, and the very concept of justice.

Diceble ok then i wouldn't recommend being a lawyer..?

Diceble ok then i wouldn't recommend being a lawyer..?

@drysoup That apparently means dropping any kind of humanity for some. Defending such cases which such arguments, is nearly justifying what he did. Horrible in my opinion

that's a lawyers job? defend the sometimes indefensible, which means using any arguments they have

that's a lawyers job? defend the sometimes indefensible, which means using any arguments they have

Just as an example of what I think is the prosecution doing the same sort of thing - he talks about how he didn't shoot in the "toe foot knee calf thigh" etc etc but it is my understanding most gun self-defence experts will tell you that if you intend to stop someone you <b>should</b> aim centre of mass, and at that range its not going to veer off to hit a leg or a hand. And it is the prosecutions duty to exhaust all possible arguments so again he is right to make it.

Just as an example of what I think is the prosecution doing the same sort of thing - he talks about how he didn't shoot in the "toe foot knee calf thigh" etc etc but it is my understanding most gun self-defence experts will tell you that if you intend to stop someone you *should* aim centre of mass, and at that range its not going to veer off to hit a leg or a hand. And it is the prosecutions duty to exhaust all possible arguments so again he is right to make it.

A lawyer has a duty to his client to make the best possible case and exhaust every argument in their defence. It's a pretty rubbish point I'll agree, but while his client was pleading innocent he was right to make it.


Those cops know sure as shit what a force multiplier is


Michael: it’s illegal for you to park there!!!”
Also Michael: illegally parks to confront her

Michael: it’s illegal for you to park there!!!”
Also Michael: *illegally parks to confront her*

@Bowser Houdini Yes definitely, better than dead tho... Specially dead by a """"vigilante""""

@Bowser Houdini they said she moved her car so she must have thought so

@Bowser Houdini you get fined a lot for using the spots if caught

Serious question though... would the man who was shot / the woman recieve a parking ticket in this situation?

@Fuz ah yes when shooting someone on the torso you never mean to kill

@marvingardens
 “hey you can’t park there!”

commits several ethnic cleansings

@marvingardens
 “hey you can’t park there!”

*commits several ethnic cleansings*

hey can i have some ketchup i heard you were the ketchup maker

if it was good enough for her it was good enough for him.

"It's illegal for you to park there!"<br> *𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐦𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫

"It's illegal for you to park there!"
 *𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐦𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫


I’m a bit late to this video but what about his complete disregard of firing a gun towards the store? Lucky nobody else got hit too


i swear the comments be the funniest shit in all these vids 😂


He’s really milking that arm “injury” as much as he can.

@Angie Sin : I just wasn't sure from your comment but yeah, I agree 100%.

@Robin C oh my goodness of course he deserved to be pushed Im just saying yes he didn’t need to go that extent to put his arm in his shirt and be dramatic about it and be so calm about everything but he did get his shit rocked and probably fell on it pretty hard I’m glad he got that push in before what happened...I wish he could’ve done more and I wish people aren’t so fucked to just pull a gun out on a man and shoot him over something so unnecessary it’s absolutely terrible I feel so much and I send all my love to his family and to the people who loved him dearly and he did not deserve what happened to him

@Angie Sin : I can't tell if you think he deserved to be pushed or not. I hope you do think that push was justified.

@KowalSky that’s why he’s retired, I think He’s being a baby about his arm  cuz the guy who got shot rocked his world before being shot so he probably fell on it pretty hard

Right 100%, but I mean that guy did rock his world when getting pushed

@B Sheppard lol, i thought he was given it by the cops. you can see him push himself off the floor to get up with that arm, yet he has his own made up sling. I hope this was used in court to demostrate his ability of deception.

I sprained my wrist at work, I couldn't even pick up a shopping bag. I would grimace every time I inadvertently grabbed something heavy

@ThunderstruckMedia : Haha that had me laughing. I bet he's the type of guy to say that unironically.

You can literally see him playing it up like big-time. Wook at my widdle big injuwy.

@KowalSky nah he said he landed on that arm, and "hurt" his wrist because the gun was in his pants and when he fell his wrist was between the gun and the concrete

He's milking everything as much as he can

Isn't that the injury from his wood chopping job? Idk just asking

Right - the way he (later) demonstrated the cupping of the gun and pointing with his "injured" arm <b>fully extended?</b>

Right - the way he (later) demonstrated the cupping of the gun and pointing with his "injured" arm *fully extended?*

When he was moving his arms around while the officers were out of the room the first time...

@B Sheppard wait that's his SHIRT?? holy fuck I didn't realise

That sling he made out of his shirt had me cracking up

I see I'm not the only one who thinks that. 👍


Two arrogant people met and it didn’t end well for either.


48:11 WTF is with the guys eyes in the Background. Omg


This guy wanted to get into a confrontation and wanted to shoot someone.  I would guess that he routinely fantasized about it.  He didn't want to go to prison though.  A person like this sees a "stand your ground" law as a way to kill someone and get away with it. He set up the entire series of events and made it happen.  Maybe he didn't know exactly when it would happen or who he would kill.  But he was wandering the neighborhood accosting people while carrying a gun. He was getting a little thrill from being able to act like he owned the town, and waiting for a chance to kill.

@Alexander Carder who was more damaging? The person using words to talk about the parking spot....or the dude who ran up to someone and pushed them on the ground? Mouth breather

@KR Standridge I never once said that McGlockton should have been shot. The purpose of my comment was to show that a stand your ground law is not a way to get away with killing someone because it doesn't apply in the vast majority of cases.

Vapid Toast I remember an old boy in the close I grew up in called old George. He was a pilot of a Lancaster bomber. But he was like that and used to chase us for being cheeky.

Spot on. And these kind of vigilantes are infuriating. But he’s obviously a very damaged person too we mustn’t forget.

All I can say is - he picked a good target.

That is not how stand your ground laws work. Stand your ground laws allow an individual to use lethal force in very select circumstances such as a forcible criminal sexual assault, a homicide,  a forcible rape, a burglary, a kidnapping, or a robbery. Outside of those specific circumstances an individual is REQUIRED to withdraw from the situation and communicate that they have withdrawn as long as they are able to unless the individual is in their own home. This is the difference between a stand your ground law and castle doctrine. Castle doctrine makes it so that an individual does not have to retreat from their own home if they believe that their life is in danger from a third party.


Paramedics arrived after 90 minutes

...

*Paramedics arrived after 90 minutes*

...


This is not legitimate defense with such a lack of proportionality


Mr. Paul Blart, parking lot cop over here


If they hadn't taken a handicapped spot or the victim hadn't assaulted the shooter, none of this would have happened.  Shooting the assailant at that distance after the assault ended looks unnecessary though.

@S Fooshy The deceased impulsively knocked Drejka to the ground without warning.  The "wife" was in the car behind a closed door.  The unstable Drejka was triggered and we know the result.  A verbal argument with Drejka would likely not have been fatal but the deceased upped the ante by turning things physical.

So the victim wasn't supposed to be defending his wife from a threatening man??

It was none of Drejka's business. If he hadn't confronted them then none of this would've happened.


My husband and I once parked at a stork/family parking 2 weeks after my c-section while my son was still in the NICU. I was just going to pick up some items from the store for him. A woman and her husband saw me going back to the car (my husband was still inside paying for stuff. I had to go in the car first cause I was starting to feel uncomfortable) and this woman and her husband starting yelling at me because I neither looked pregnant nor did they see a baby. Wouldn’t even let me explain, I was on the verge of passing out and had to sit down and they wouldn’t let me in the car. They tried to call the cops until I a worker came up to me with my husband and argued with them. They wouldn’t leave until the store employee threatened to call the cops on them.

Idk why people like this exist.

@Nic B So you are admitting that this "Nic B" personality you display here in the comments of a youtube video does not even exist.
You are pretending just to start pointless discussions with random people on the inernet.
Maybe you should go out to a barber - there you have someone to talk to in real life.

That's awful. I'm sorry you had to go through that.

That's awful. I'm sorry you had to go through that.

Doesn’t matter. You’re not legally allowed to park there without a placard

Doesn’t matter. You’re not legally allowed to park there without a placard

People like this exist because if we tell people that they can harass other citizens - even preventing someone from entering their car like in your case - and nobody is allowed to even touch them while they do the harassing - a lot of wannabe alpha, frustrated losers will be very happy to jump on that opportunity.

Your case is quite different from the video though.

Obviously the shooter is a coward who first engages because he only sees a woman and children, and then draws the classic coward's preferred weapon - a gun, meant to hit from a distance - as soon as he receives one push even though the other guy was not following it up and instead was getting farther.
This is voluntary homicide to me, there is no way the shooter had valid reasons to think his life was in danger if he didn't shoot.

But the victim was not blameless like you were. For starters they had chosen to park in a space reserved for handicapped persons despite there being other spots available right there. Big red flag. Plus he pushed the guy while the guy was not looking - not a very manly approach - and while the guy was just talking. This is very different from a woman who had a C-section 2 weeks earlier and needs to sit in her car as she is on the verge of passing out.

@Nic B So to you "stork / family parking" is the same as parking for disabled ?? Then I guess in that parking lot there were no spots marked for disabled, as they would be the "stork / family parking" ones, right ?

So because I got shot twice and survived, and am still recovering from my surgeries a month later, can I park in a handicapped spot?

So because I got shot twice and survived, and am still recovering from my surgeries a month later, can I park in a handicapped spot?

It wasn't your fault you have to let me go

These people are bitter and antisocial. Karen's. They have nothing better to do with their time.

These people are bitter and antisocial. Karen's. They have nothing better to do with their time.

Because these are demon possessed people.

Because these are demon possessed people.

@Nic B She literally explained in her original comment that she parked in a "just had a baby" parking spot... BECAUSE SHE JUST HAD A BABY.

@Nic B She literally explained in her original comment that she parked in a "just had a baby" parking spot... BECAUSE SHE JUST HAD A BABY.

@Nic B but think about this it doesn’t warrant a fight even if there not allowed to park not there job to enforce that

@Nic B but think about this it doesn’t warrant a fight even if there not allowed to park not there job to enforce that

I don't know why such people have to appoint themselves as law monitors like the community needs their services. Hopefully you and your family are well and have recovered from this.

I don't know why such people have to appoint themselves as law monitors like the community needs their services. Hopefully you and your family are well and have recovered from this.

Aw, I'm sorry that happened to you. Some people are insane and cruel.

Aw, I'm sorry that happened to you. Some people are insane and cruel.

@Nic B I’m sorry I didn’t read every single one of your comments, sheesh. Also, we only received the perspective of the OP. Based on her explanation, which isn’t very complicated. It’s clear that the stork parking was permit based (and literally none of them are because it would be 100% pointless to do so, furthermore, they’re put there by the companies, not mandated by legislation). My point is I don’t see why you’re arguing against the OP in the first place. What she did isn’t illegal, or even unethical, it seems like you just wanted to argue for the basis of arguing only as there isn’t a resolution. You say you’ve been alluding to what I said, but you did it in such a roundabout and obtuse way. If that’s what you meant then just say it.

I think people that make a big deal out of someone using disabled parking are deep down really just jealous they don’t get to use it. Otherwise why do they care so much. I doubt they are just concerned for all the “real “ disabled people. What I see most of the time is all the disabled parking is left empty at the front of the store and no one is using it so it’s just going to waste.

I’m sorry to hear you went through this. Healing after a c section is very painful and I got lightheaded and tired easily for a month afterwards. I hope your son is healthy.

I’m sorry to hear you went through this. Healing after a c section is very painful and I got lightheaded and tired easily for a month afterwards. I hope your son is healthy.

@Ivar The Boneless oh damn look at you go

@Ivar The Boneless oh damn look at you go

So sorry that happened to you. The world is cruel. We live in a modern dark age. Please take care.

So sorry that happened to you. The world is cruel. We live in a modern dark age. Please take care.

@Racmaster00 That's the point. You aren't.

@Racmaster00 That's the point. You aren't.

@Racmaster00 You know what's cringeworthy? Trying to shut down a conversation with the words "OK Karen". Instantly makes you look like an edgy 14 year old, regardless of whether or not you're in the right.

@Racmaster00 You sir get the "good person" award

@Racmaster00 You sir get the "good person" award

@PianoDisneygal10 bro your beating his ass lmaooo

@PianoDisneygal10 bro your beating his ass lmaooo

@Nic B also your response was really cringe

@Nic B also your response was really cringe

America is surely a scary place, I've never seen people like that here.

America is surely a scary place, I've never seen people like that here.

@Nic B So you think it was right that the couple prevented that poor woman from entering her vehicle? <br>They wouldn’t even let her sit down.

@Nic B So you think it was right that the couple prevented that poor woman from entering her vehicle?
They wouldn’t even let her sit down.

Because they dont want their country to be like nicaragua. and when you come live among them you live by their rules and not bring your 3rd world lawlessness

Because they dont want their country to be like nicaragua. and when you come live among them you live by their rules and not bring your 3rd world lawlessness

I'm so sorry. I have a disability that affects my mobility on different days. I have a disability placard and just because I can walk on some days I've been accused of having a fake placard and had the cops called on me.

@Nic B It's always hilarious when a narcissist tells other people to get of their high horse. Just let the woman park wherever she wants, if she is close to passing out. If you disagree you're nothing but a psychopath. Get lost.

@Nic B thank you for that also.  I’m an intellect and I indulge in adult conversations. Thank you for being persistent and articulate. There are many people especially on YT that are quick to insult, shame etc. and do not possess or can construct a simple dialect but feel the need to be right based on their own opinion(s) and not the views of others: especially to things/situations that he or she has no direct impact in. Not. A. Dog. In. The. Fight as you will.  I appreciate the back and forth sir!

@Nic B also also. You don’t have to know someone to read them to tell and possibly predict their future outcome(s). Live life long enough to gain a 3rd/4th eye based off of countless unbiased experiences with various people.  The point is mastering to “read” people. Body language, response, eye contact, mannerisms, etc. etc. etc.  good talk though.

@Nic B you’re right. I could have could have been passive but I’m not.  I detest  when people stare for instance and not nod or say hi or hello or how are you.  That’s rude. Going back to the guy, he was pacing and staring.  There’s more to this story though but I just gave you a glimpse.

Story in short.  He stares and looks all over the front of the car. As you mentioned and we know why. Searching half desperately for a placard.  He goes inside the building and complains. Setting off a chain reaction to others.  Comes back outside and does the same thing. I pull the window down and ask “the heck are you looking at..”
he asks about the placard and I ask “have you checked the back of the car?”  He does and his suspicion is now quelled.  Meanwhile the people inside who heard his complain started to wonder as they know him and probably trust him. They become suspicious about me and wonder.  We are outside talking about misunderstandings while the manager inside become upset because no one quelled his suspicions based on the guy’s complaint. The guy leaves and I go inside and was confronted (chain reaction). The manager and I talk about it and once again I had to quell his suspicions. We talk and talk until my wife shows up, saying she was worried because our daughters’ class was over 10 minutes ago. The teacher called. Distracted, my phone was left in the car talking to a complete and utter stranger. While talking to the manager I could see my daughter dancing and playing and thought nothing of it. Was harmless.  My wife saw on the news that there was a car accident and was worried that we could have been in it.  She was relieved when she saw me.

Now.  Do you see how one person being a somewhat parking vigilante could cause a chain reaction for so many people.  A complete stranger who I will never see again probably and serve 0 purpose in my life affected at least myself + 6 other people in a manner of 20 minutes and for what? What was the outcome to his query? Why? What purpose did it serve? But to relinquish his own “personal” insecurities and or past about people parking in a handicap space with a placard not showing? When he couldn’t take the time as the video showed to look around the entire car? What then? Would he still complain after seeing plates that it wasn’t warranted or still complain that or as you put it “supposed to be hung from the mirror so that it can be seen fore and aft”.

Tell me what was the end goal. You see it was a selfish move by that guy and I will never know the back story to it. Meaning, there must have been a past story as to the ultimate “trigger”.

Referring to inviting potential confrontation is actually being the antagonist.  The guy was.
Scenario: he could have just walked past the car and went home.
Or: (his actions) created an inescapable situation where a person has to be involved.  What if he called the police? Invited you say to this confrontational party, sorry my guy. That was something I preferred to stay away from but I will oblige rude and disrespectful people and THAT I do not need an invitation for.  I’m buying drinks for that party/roast/confrontation.
Make excuses for him all you want. The point is and will every be. Mind yo damn business. (Unless there is a direct threat to self and others) otherwise he wa just a male Karen. Hopeless and alone, not a single life and probably full of disparity. Wanting, thriving the need to feel important and heard. To be seen as some people stay hidden from others. Knowing that time is against him in life.
Some sad shit after you deconstruct it.  Thoughts?

@Nic B what reality is, is that I can’t stop someone from staring, looking as reality is I can’t control people obviously .  The difference between myself and that person (for all intensive purpose) who stared, got upset for no reason is the point.  I wouldn’t. Reality is some people put themselves into a precarious situation and instigate it when they don’t need to. Staring or recording fine but to further escalate from a position of being passive on up is what I’m talking about.  There’s a thing called “ownage” where some people think that they own people they come into contact with, with words and gestures and also directive(s).

You don’t know someone from atom. You don’t know what the are holding, if he or she is crazy etc. and yet and still force your way into their life disingenuously. That’s a no.
I can record someone as well as you can, (as I assume you did a background check on me) but if I were to go into their AO, as I don’t care what does that make me!? If I walked pass someone’s car (and I am disabled) and I don’t see a placard (mind you I don’t care) I don’t have dog in the fight. Now I have confronted someone for parking in a disabled spot why? Because I needed to park and because that affected me. There’s a difference.

@Nic B his staring does not make sense.  Why should he care or anyone for that matter? What does he have to gain but waste my time? Point is people need to mind their business. Period.

@Nic B his staring does not make sense.  Why should he care or anyone for that matter? What does he have to gain but waste my time? Point is people need to mind their business. Period.

People like that get on my nerves. Mind your business. Trying to play cop, judge, and executioner.

People like that get on my nerves. Mind your business. Trying to play cop, judge, and executioner.

I'm curious why people confront people over this.  Just take a cell photo and turn it in.  Confronting people will only lead to escalation.  So don't be surprised if someone delivers you several ham sandwiches.

@Nic B  If you think it took any more time out of my day to write that comment than it does yours then your are mistaken

@Nic B  If you think it took any more time out of my day to write that comment than it does yours then your are mistaken

@Nic B Do you have nothing better to do than get up in arms over a youtube comment? Scrolling through and seeing how many times you’ve replied makes me feel like you need to go touch some grass or something

@Nic B she was in stork/ family parking.

@Nic B she was in stork/ family parking.

@Nic B LOL Nicolas stop. Please its too much

@Nic B LOL Nicolas stop. Please its too much

@Nic B There it is! so damn predictable, I may not know you but I know what type of person you are. So awesome how this works LOL

@Nic B There it is! so damn predictable, I may not know you but I know what type of person you are. So awesome how this works LOL

@Nic B There's a reason why Nic B commented to the OP like they did, and by the looks of it they certainly realize who/what they are. 17 days.....17 days of them acting like a keyboard warrior. love it

@Nic B There's a reason why Nic B commented to the OP like they did, and by the looks of it they certainly realize who/what they are. 17 days.....17 days of them acting like a keyboard warrior. love it

@Nic B Holy shit dude, you're exactly like the people that end up in these videos.

@Nic B Holy shit dude, you're exactly like the people that end up in these videos.

I'm sure you deserved to get called out for not having anything to prove that you can use the parking lot, but yelling, blocking you from getting in the car, and attempting to call the cops... That's just harassment.

@Nic B So, why did you, a commenter, as after watching a video, feel obliged to argue in the comment section for unrelated causes, with multiple assumptions, even though you clearly need not get out of anyone's way - the people who “yelled” at you obviously feel justified in questioning in other's experiences, understandably so from your own point of view, without considering the world is vastly different from whatever place you're from. It wouldn't hurt to use a period and get off your high horse.

@Nic B why do stork people get a special place to park? They are the ones that got to have the fun. Now I have to listen to their screaming monsters when I go shopping 3 years later.  I park sideways in stork spots

@Nic B never said that you said that. But you’re acting like it is, because you basically sided with the people that were confronting the OP. Anyways, I can tell you just want to be argumentative, and this is exhausting. I’ll let you have the final word if you wish.

@PianoDisneygal10 Absolutely not of course. As mentioned: He had the right to pull his gun to defend himself but pulling the trigger showed that he not fired because of self defense but more out of being angry/mad or tired of being pushed around. I guess both did wrong and paid the price.

@Vitorruy1 I know what you mean, buddy. This is why i ALWAYS kept calm and silent in tense situations in real life. Even tho sometimes i felt like regretting this since i was upset afterwards for months and asked myself why i let other people shout at me for no reason.

@Nic B OP was likely in a grey area where she was fit to leave her house, but wasn’t driving and still was very much recovering from major surgery. People don’t just suddenly cease to have needs to go out shopping for stuff while recovering.

Also as someone else pointed out to you, stork parking isn’t like a legally regulated thing like handicap parking. So…it really is just a parking spot with a fancy sign. It is not legally enforceable to get someone to move from there. You should be wondering why the confronters of the OP were threatening to call the cops lol.

@Nic B “Mothers recovering from c section shouldn’t be driving”
Who said OP was?
Would I be annoyed? Maybe, but more than likely, I’d hardly be paying attention and policing  whether or not someone actually needs to be parking there. Definitely would never dream of directly confronting them.

@Nic B it’s pretty rich you telling someone to get off their high horse when you’ve legit been acting like stork/family parking is the most important thing in the world. As far as I’m concerned, if a permit isn’t required to park there, it’s a free spot. There’s legit zero legal requirement to park there. It’s a courtesy spot only. There has never been a permit, requirement, nor fine for parking in stork/family parking and never will. Wanna know why, because it’s literally considered a courtesy spot by the companies that place them there. However there’s no legal standing or authoritative body that can tell you to move or punish you for using it. It’s the same idea as the larger toilet stall for older or handicapped people, ideally you shouldn’t use it if you have another option, but no one can prevent  you, fine you, or detain you from using it as it is only a courtesy. It’s absurd to judge a new mother for using the spot especially when there’s no one vying for it or in need of it in that moment.

@Dornpunzel Be careful before you do something stupid that you will regret. You become the guy who escalates minor inconveniences into shouting matches or even physical violence and still thinks he is in the right.

@Dornpunzel does that justify shooting people who have parked illegally because you got into a fight you had no business getting into?

@Dornpunzel does that justify shooting people who have parked illegally because you got into a fight you had no business getting into?

@Nic B You kinda missed the part where she was literally recovering from a C Section, and was physically weak. I guarantee that baby parking, or whatever the fuck it’s called is specifically for new mothers, baby or not; because as it turns out, childbirth is an extremely painful and draining experience, more so if they have to use surgery to get the baby out.

Also, if it’s in America, I guarantee there was no permit required like a handicap placard. Literally everything other than handicap parking is usually just done by the store, and goes off the honor system that someone wouldn’t lie about needing a space closer to the store. So, getting mad because some internet stranger took a parking spot that they needed, that wasn’t against the law, is kinda… pointless. It’s not like her story is going to embolden people to park in the pram parking or whatever because they hate new mothers.

But I’m sure you know that, and are just trolling in the most obtuse and circular way possible. That’s at least what it seems like, and you’re not even good at it, because you just keep repeating the same dumb shit over and over.

@Nic B you cared enough to tell her she was wrong to park there. When in actuality, you have zero clue if that’s true. Where I live, stork parking permits aren’t a thing. They’re on the honor system. And new mothers who are still recovering from a c section can certainly park there sans baby. No cop is gonna come and arrest somebody for parking there because it isn’t illegal to do so under any circumstances where I live. Maybe the OP also lives in a place like that.

So, yes, your opinion on the rightness or wrongness of the OP’s actions is literally your perception, even by your own definition of how perception works. Because you don’t have the whole story or all of the answers.

@Nic B you can comment but not when you then go and say “I don’t care about rando internet person stories” after <b>just</b> criticizing a rando internet person’s actions in their rando internet person’s story. 😉

@Nic B you can comment but not when you then go and say “I don’t care about rando internet person stories” after *just* criticizing a rando internet person’s actions in their rando internet person’s story. 😉

@Nic B you sure seem to care about random people’s stories when you think you know better and can “educate” people on the law or whatever the hell it is you’re trying to do. But then when someone else brings along another story that talks about people acting like how you just did (inappropriately telling people where they can or cannot park based on perceived eligibility), you suddenly don’t care.

@Nic B you don’t care about random people’s stories, yet…you cared enough to try and take this commenter down a few pegs 🙃 whoops.

@Nic B you don’t care about random people’s stories, yet…you cared enough to try and take this commenter down a few pegs 🙃 whoops.

@PianoDisneygal10  i'm so glad your dad was ok!!

@PianoDisneygal10  i'm so glad your dad was ok!!

@Nic B also, where the hell do you live with stork signs that say you need a permit? Lol

@Nic B also, where the hell do you live with stork signs that say you need a permit? Lol

@Nic B meh, people come up to folks with legitimate handicap placards and yell at them if they don’t look disabled enough.

Signed,

A person with a dad who had his first heart attack at age 48 and definitely would have died from it had he not been in the hospital already when he had it, who (due to his surgery and now compromised heart function) now needs a handicap placard. I distinctly recall one time where my dad parked in a handicap spot as normal, and proceeded to walk with the rest of us who were all in the car to the restaurant for dinner. My dad’s handicap is not immediately visible. Hence, one entitled couple decided to tell us off for parking there when we clearly didn’t need it. We shot back at them with “He’s had heart surgery. We can have him lift up his shirt to prove it to you.”

Luckily that shut them up but some aren’t so lucky.

yeah this woman and her husband don’t have any right talking to you and you don’t owe them any explanation. just because you don’t <b>look</b> pregnant doesn’t mean you don’t reserve the right to use that parking spot. a perfect example of you haven no idea what kinda shit someone else is going through just by looking at them. i’m sorry you went through that.. i don’t know why they wouldn’t let you in the car, either, it seems ridiculous that they’re simultaneously telling you to get out of the parking spot, but also blocking your way to the car??????

yeah this woman and her husband don’t have any right talking to you and you don’t owe them any explanation. just because you don’t *look* pregnant doesn’t mean you don’t reserve the right to use that parking spot. a perfect example of you haven no idea what kinda shit someone else is going through just by looking at them. i’m sorry you went through that.. i don’t know why they wouldn’t let you in the car, either, it seems ridiculous that they’re simultaneously telling you to get out of the parking spot, but also blocking your way to the car??????

@Nic B
Nope, you do not need a permit to park in stork/parenting parking. Disabled parking =/= parenting parking, in any way.
You fail both at reading and at knowing what you're talking about.

@Nic B
Nope, you do not need a permit to park in stork/parenting parking. Disabled parking =/= parenting parking, in any way.
You fail both at reading and at knowing what you're talking about.

@Nic B <br>They very clearly said it was not handicapped parking, so why would you assume that?

@Nic B
They very clearly said it was not handicapped parking, so why would you assume that?

As if that was something worth calling the cops for in the first place. How absurd.

As if that was something worth calling the cops for in the first place. How absurd.

I'm so sorry that happened to you, I know if it were me, I'd be so emotional about that confrontation. (Embarrassed, angry, physical pain) I've had three. Sounds like you have a good man that stood up for you though! They should have felt like jerks and apologized. I've had 3 c sections, they are tough, major abdominal surgery!


Revelation 20 And I saw an angel coming down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit, and a great chain in his hand.

2 And he laid hold on the dragon the old serpent, which is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.

3 And he cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should no more seduce the nations, till the thousand years be finished. And after that, he must be loosed a little time.

4 And I saw seats; and they sat upon them; and judgment was given unto them; and the souls of them that were beheaded for the testimony of Lord God Jesus, and for the word of Lord God, and who had not adored the beast nor his image, nor received his character on their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Lord God Christ a thousand years.

5 The rest of the dead lived not, till the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection. In these the second death hath no power; but they shall be priests of Lord God and of Lord God Christ; and shall reign with him a thousand years.

7 And when the thousand years shall be finished, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and shall go forth, and seduce the nations, which are over the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, and shall gather them together to battle, the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.

8 And they came upon the breadth of the earth, and encompassed the camp of the saints, and the beloved city.

9 And there came down fire from Lord God out of heaven, and devoured them; and the devil, who seduced them, was cast into the pool of fire and brimstone, where both the beast

10 And the false prophet shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

11 And I saw a great white throne, and one sitting upon it, from whose face the earth and heaven fled away, and there was no place found for them.

12 And I saw the dead, great and small, standing in the presence of the throne, and the books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged by those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

13 And the sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and hell gave up their dead that were in them; and they were judged every one according to their works.

14 And hell and death were cast into the pool of fire. This is the second death.

15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life, was cast into the pool of fire.


Hopefully McGlockton learned his lesson!


why r there so many Michaels on this channel should we be worried


This is the kind of guy to pull a citizen's arrest on a jay walker

This is the kind of guy to pull a citizen's arrest on a jay walker

Why is nobody mentioning the fact that the victim parked in a handicap spot?
Listen, I'm not justifying him being shot but I hate arrogant people who just think they can do anything they want - with an "IDGAF" attitude, such as parking in a disabled parking spot when they're not disabled. These types of people are scumbags.
He did not deserve to be shot over this but unfortunately, he crossed somebody who was a little more arrogant than him that day and paid the consequences.
Sorry but both the suspect and the victim can kiss my ***

@Marelody Well, Mr. Michael just committed a far worse crime than parking in the handicapped spot

@75ur15 I meant he wasn't charging in to start pummeling the man whilst he was on the ground. He took a step forward and looked like he was asking him something. Probably "why the fuck are you berating my wife"

@Properly Gaming to be fair, the man did approach him after he went down, it was after he noticed his hand that he started to back away. The shove wasn't justified, the draw WAS 100% justified, the SHOT was not justified, and I fully support the verdict. Had he fired several shots I would have supported a second degree verdict.

@HanZ Bananz havent read the whole chain yett, but to be fair, he wasn't "extremely close" to his family. as the man walked up he was more than an armslength from the vehicle, SHE got out, removing the door as a defense, the drive away option, and closing the distance, so the shove was not justified. The shot was also NOT justified and I support the verdict.

@Taco King it was justified, video evidence showed exactly what happened, he got pushed fell to the ground black father didn't go charging at him to pummel him while on the ground after he pushed, him guy pulled gun black father proceeded to back up and he fired anyways. He got charged and convicted cause what he did was wrong. You can boohoo about it all day doesn't change the fact he got punished rightly for his actions

@Tom Anderson bud you have to be 21 to have a handgun first off... Secondly you don't see 16 year old's walking around with shotguns and rifles in 99% of the country. People like you believe the media the same media that wants guns banned and that's the only problem America has. We have so much corrupt media and biased media and it doesn't help that liberals own social media.... Sorry bud but I've never heard gunshots outside at night meanwhile most people around me have firearms. Most of these shootings take place in areas with laws that prevent law abiding citizens from defending themselves. Heck most of these mass shootings are really just gang related shootings but saying we have thousands of mass shootings a year sounds better especially when you can try and associate mass shootings with straight white men which happen to be the enemy in this country right now.

Eventually things will change and social media sites etc will get proper regulations that they deserve that away they cant keep pedaling BS while claiming fake news and linking CNN as the source I mean really.... How bias do you have to be to call a tweet fake news and then use a CNN article as a legitimate unbias source not some bias media company.

@el ehhhhh is a verbal argument really enough of a reason to shove that man to the ground like that? They all made poor choices and they all have to deal with the consequences that's life. The only victims are the children its really that simple I don't feel sorry for any of them.

@Truthsoldier cant stand people that park in handicap spots because they feel entitled.

@Young minds podcast it’s not like he’s had multiple arrests or anything

like mine your business did you see all those empty parking spots 😭

@Mike Mc so your dad wouldn't defend your family from a crazy dude he doesn't know yelling at his girlfriend and two kids?

@Tom Anderson no, that's not accurate. In many states you have to be 21 unless it's with a hunting license or as a member of law enforcement, like my state of Florida, where even for longarms one must be 21 unless their a member of law enforcement or military service.

@Marelody so kill them? Huh seems really balanced

@Marelody so kill them? Huh seems really balanced

@Lukkaboc You can buy yourself a gun before you can buy a pint, lol. Why do people even NEED guns anyway? I certainly get along fine without. As does much of the developed world's population

@Tom Anderson In US you have to be 18 to have a gun, but you can own a car at 16. So your murders will have to be vehicular manslaughter for a couple years before you can get a gun.  This guy's permit should've been revoked due to the previous incidents.  I'm not sure the process to revoke an owner's permit.

this is gold. I witnessed some lady get hit while jaywalking. The driver called the cops driver was off the hook and she was hit with a ticket for jaywalking and a big Hospital Bill.

@Tom Anderson gun laws are much tighter than that. At least in larger cities. Like Chicago, and see how well gun laws work there. The real problem is this “see something say something” mentality we have developed since 9/11. This guy didn’t need to start shit over a parking spot. It was a convenience store, every single spot at the store is closer to the door than the handicapped spots you find at Walmart.

@el not a reason definitely, but it is not lightly being pushed, this is really lightly  being pushed and look what consequences it can have if you happen to fall on your head https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR5tIELdM-g.    It was undeniably an aggressive move to go there and push him over immediately. He didn't had to get shot for it which was unnecessary and over exaggerated in the situation but the victim was far from an innocent father, he resolved immediately to violence.

@HanZ Bananz "extremely close", she was in a car, she basically could just drive away lol. This is the situation of a crazy gun freak, a probable Karen and an aggressive man having a dispute together. Karen escalates a dispute , aggressive man becomes violent and crazy cold blooded  gun freak has been waiting on a moment to pull a trigger and kill someone..

Probably make a citizens arrest for walking on his pavement and breathing

Marelody ... No. because there were plenty empty spots closer to the door. The guy was a wannabe enforcer. Not to mention with a disability sticker you can park on roof of a house and no one will ticket you. While it's true ppl are assholes for taking up those spaces it did not prevent anyone from accessibility.

stevan saucedo well I would hope my dad would have enough sense to not shove a crazy guy on the ground

Vagabond_Charlie sure, but that doesn’t mean he had a right to shoot an unarmed man, he had no weapon and just shoved him god damn

Vagabond_Charlie the “physical assault” was being lightly pushed over because he was getting too close to his wife and yelling at her. Not a reason to shoot someone at all

@HanZ Bananz plus she was in the vehicle and could have moved the car or got her man to do it. It's not the end of the world, an inconvenience but not life ending worthy.

The guy who he shot wasn’t even the one who parked there! He was literally a concerned father/ husband who saw a man extremely close to his family and shoved him away. So all this “ to be fair he was parked in the handicapped parking spot“ is bullshit

One of the comments here was made by a Smooth brain

One of the comments here was made by a Smooth brain

@Young minds podcast Bro, this guy was a public menance this was the 5 recorded incident of him pulling a gun out on someone 2 of the previous people were unarmed women. I think he's been dying for an excuse to shoot someone for a long time and he finaly put himself in a situation where he thought he'd get away with it.

“He’s not a bad guy” Did you turn your ears off at 36:40 were it’s proven he pulled a gun on 4 other people AND he was the antagonists in those situations?!

liller definitely not. I’m just saying that it’s kinda an asshole thing to do. But this guy went way way too far

@Young minds podcast anyone who draws a weapon on someone after being pushed,  said person who pushed you backed off and then you still choose to fire then you are in fact a bad guy who deserves to be off the street because you are a threat to people around you.

Marelody ehhhh... is that <i>really</i> a reason to shoot and kill someone...

Marelody ehhhh... is that _really_ a reason to shoot and kill someone...

To be fair they were taking a spot away from a potentially disabled person

@stevan saucedo id say well dad ya fucked up

@stevan saucedo id say well dad ya fucked up

he is not a bad guy i don't think he should of gotten that long

he is not a bad guy i don't think he should of gotten that long


State vs. Civilian. It seems only normal that state prosecutor has way better suit than the defence attorney???


The thing about fake jakes is that they never shut the hell up and enjoy digging theirselves into holes


I physically cringed every time he said “negative” and I feel like the cop did, too.

The worst was when he used "Force Multiplier" a military term. Like clearly this guy has watched too many movies


Revelation 17 And there came one of the seven angels, who had the seven vials, and spoke with me, saying: Come, I will shew thee the condemnation of the great harlot, who sitteth upon many waters,

2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication; and they who inhabit the earth, have been made drunk with the wine of her whoredom.

3 And he took me away in spirit into the desert. And I saw a woman sitting upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.

4 And the woman was clothed round about with purple and scarlet, and gilt with gold, and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand, full of the abomination and filthiness of her fornication.

5 And on her forehead a name was written: A mystery; Babylon the great, the mother of the fornications, and the abominations of the earth.

6 And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Lord God Jesus. And I wondered, when I had seen her, with great admiration.

7 And the angel said to me: Why dost thou wonder? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast which carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.

8 The beast, which thou sawest, was, and is not, and shall come up out of the bottomless pit, and go into destruction: and the inhabitants on the earth (whose names are not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world) shall wonder, seeing the beast that was, and is not.

9 And here is the understanding that hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, upon which the woman sitteth, and they are seven kings:

10 Five are fallen, one is, and the other is not yet come: and when he is come, he must remain a short time.

11 And the beast which was, and is not: the same also is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into destruction.

12 And the ten horns which thou sawest, are ten kings, who have not yet received a kingdom, but shall receive power as kings one hour after the beast.

13 These have one design: and their strength and power they shall deliver to the beast.

14 These shall fight with the Lord God Lamb, and the Lord God Lamb shall overcome them, because he is Lord of lords, and King of kings, and they that are with him are called, and elect, and faithful.

15 And he said to me: The waters which thou sawest, where the harlot sitteth, are peoples, and nations, and tongues.

16 And the ten horns which thou sawest in the beast: these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her with fire.

17 For Lord God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of Lord God be fulfilled.

18 And the woman which thou sawest, is the great city, which hath kingdom over the kings of the earth.


conclusde wrong place for HC spot closer to the door is more like it. bad argument when it looks so far away. too much anger there for everyone


It really irritates me when someone parks in a handicapped spot without the plates or placard. But the worst I would do is shake my head at them. I believe karma will do the rest, I'm not spending possibly the rest of my life in prison over a dang parking spot.