Today I've learnt that if a cop says "I'm just trying to understand" they already understand what happened

I've learned that if a cop is being nice to you, you're already fucked. Just shut up and ask for a lawyer.

Except all the times they obviously didn't understand

Like when a women says " i just want to know what happen... majority of the time she already knows, she just wants to see if your going to lie to her face

I’m just trying to understand, “you didn’t say anything to him?” He must have asked him that 6 times. He dug himself deeper every time he said no.

@V -yrz The guy carries a gun with him when he's doing errands around his neighbourhood. He's lived his whole life waiting for his moment to "justify" murdering someone. How quickly he pulled out the "21 foot rule" implies he was hoping someone would act threateningly within 21 feet of him at some point in his life. This was like hitting the jackpot for this guy.

@Portalmaster GC not really. The narrator has the power of hindsight.

My ex used to do that. It was annoying AF.

Wrong lesson.  The lesson you should have learned is "don't talk to cops" not "now I have a better understanding of what cops are saying when they talk to me"

Never consent to police interrogation.  Wait for your lawyer.  You have your day in court.  Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.

@Rod Evans you and  @Poker Joker  need to chill... both words are correct lmao

@Rod Evans mate you clearly live in a cave, "learnt" is indeed a valid word to be used instead of "learned"

@William Knight the fact is, he was so happy to have murdered a guy that he needed to brag about it with the interrogators. And that's exactly how you tell a ruthless killer from a person who just temporarily snapped and made a stupid decision.

@Rod Evans Most of the english speaking world uses learnt US and Canada uses learned

@Poker Joker Learnt and Learned, both are correct, smh.

@White Fox most likely thinking about how to worsen the person there sitting across’s life as much as humanly possible

Once they read your rights, stop talking and get a lawyer. Cooperate with where they want you to go, but don't answer anything.

@Portalmaster GC Not exactly, it explains their methods of interrogation, but we still can't know what were their personal thoughts.

Just like the ol' "It's not you..." when you breaking up w somebody.

If they bother to bring you in at all they've probably got your azz nailed and are only tryin to provide context for the DA to further leverage against you.

@White Fox that's kinda what this channel is. inside the mind of an interrogator

@Shnood I would love to hear what they are really thinking while they are talking to the suspects.

"I'm just trying to understand how to get you the maximum sentence possible"


The irony of him parking illegally in order to tell someone they're parked illegally sums up the situation perfectly

@Max 404 We all get to choose what battles are worth fighting for, and in this case, he should've erred on the side of caution & safety. It was only a matter of time before this wannabe cop made a bad decision. He will learn all about fear & pain. He claims that he's never been in a fight, good luck with that in prison.

@lavya p Several witnesses testified at trial that Drejka was very loud and threatening. 2 of them immediately told the store owner and who they (correctly) assumed to be the woman's husband, Marquis, what was happening outside. If Drejka was a friendly man commenting on what a nice day it was or something then he wouldn't have been shoved to the ground.

@Shotty Drejka wasn't "talking" to her, he was yelling and swearing at her, to the point where other customers, both coming OUT of the store and going in ALL stopped to watch and listen (they testified to this at the trial). If he had been speaking in a calm, polite manner I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have paid the least bit of attention. And he didn't need to touch the car. He had her trapped by standing blocking the door and he was speaking in a threatening manner which is part of the reason why he was convicted, because he instigated the entire incident. He is NOT the parking lot police. It's not his property so he had no right to walk over and say ANYTHING. In doing so he became the aggressor.

@TerribleZebra Yes, that became clear during the trial.

@Max 404 in the vid you can hear him describing the altercation and saying when the women in the car asked ïs it any of your business" the shooter responded acording to him with "no but if my handicapped mother would have droven up it would be" so im going to assume he was not planning to stand there himself

@Stonk Nooby Anyone can argue with anyone. It's not a crime.

@Max 404 it’s not his job to enforce who uses the parking spot at the gas station bro, what are you on about

@christian Michael Drejka started a commotion and ended up in jail.His behaviour was foolish.Now he has lost his freedom and is in a world of regret for his unneccessary,unwanted actions.

So going back if the other person just push him that hard to the ground injury this one iam guessing we won't be here watching and writing about this.... than probably it's how always should be treated throwing someone to the ground that hard( like imagine when you get involved in something like that). The handicapped place is there not for selfish or lazy people use them. Perchance. Most certain he don't like black people and shouldn't NEVER shoot to kill....

These type of people have a superior complex. They believe that they are better than others and have a right to tell people what they believe is right.

@Shotty If good people mind their own business, bad people win.
But one has to be cautious, when confronting bad or stupid people.
Sometimes two idiots meet and things go downhill fast.

@Dj Pierce Well, that's what JCS said. A lot of arguments have been made in the court case. The case is not as clear as day.

@Max 404 there's a difference between retirement and simply not working anymore. And even if that's true there's not a single argument that could be used to justify his actions. None.

Exactly. This is just male Karen levels 🙄

@Melinda Mahoney we don't know details of the level of confrontation between the shooter and the lady. Either the victim assumed that the guy is threatening his wife or he could hear some threat from inside the shop... else why did he come and push that guy to the ground without even talking to the guy! I wish ppl just remain calm during any argument... anger blinds the mind... unnecessary loss of life when it could have ended with just a simple argument.  This is the bad aspect of owning firearms...anger + easy access to a weapon is a dangerous combination

@Shotty except that somebody went in and announced that there was a loud altercation outside between a man and a woman.

This is a perfect example of mind your own business on the shooters side, and fuck around and find out on the victims side. They were both wrong. Had the victim not immediately resorted to physical assault (what if the guy was just asking directions, and just because he’s talking to your old lady you assault him) then he could have likely avoided being shit. And if the shooter had not made it his business to enforce parking at a fucking gas station the whole situation could have been avoided.

@S He retired in his 30s. Maybe he had the right to use that handicap spot.<br>I am just saying, i think he wanted the spot.

@S He retired in his 30s. Maybe he had the right to use that handicap spot.
I am just saying, i think he wanted the spot.

@Max 404 He didn't need the handicap spot. Even if he did, the open parking spaces in front of the store are much closer than the handicap spots anyway. And if he thinks they're violating the law then he should call the cops. Parking illegally then approaching their car is the wrong thing to do, even if they were illegally parked in the handicap spot

exactly what the judge said. I dont think he was even going into the store. I am certain he just drives by just to check if someone was there just to go start sh*t.

@Max 404 oooooh.... that makes it all better then.

I think he parked there temporarily because he actually wanted her parking space.


We miss you jcs. Been rewatching old vids of yours, hope yt stops being stupid and let's u come back! You're my fav channel 💓

That is one thing we can all agree on. They were the BEST.

@Jarthen Greenmeadow mr ballen is super addicting, ive watched all his videos already in one months time, hes amazing.

Is there any way to watch the videos that have been removed from YouTube, or are they just lost to the ether?

@christian Red Tree Crime is pretty good imo

@christian “Stranger stories” is another channel to check out 👌🏻

the "JCS inspired" channels are blooming, and they are JUST as good : )

@Kainan Hupp what do u mean? Why got in trouble?

Its wack because some of the stuff some of these channels get to post and keep on and dont get in trouble is crazy

Mr Ballen. He's not JCS like but he has great stories.

@Lee Davies I don't know if he did the right thing, however, I believe under US law he should have been dismissed. I have seen far more unprovoked cases beat the wrap.

Drejka did the right thing, he was attacked, end of story.

@christian I am totally hooked on @swordandscale

@Kirk B T Yes his other channel is Kizzume

@Kathleen J Yes I recently found Explore With Us and it is really great

thank you everyone who recommended I'll check them all out. I'll be working an overnight shift next week while our usual overnight person goes on vacation. this will really help. really appreciate it!

@christian I just recently found a channel "explore with us". It reminds me of this channel I think it's pretty good.  You may or may not like it but worth checking out   and of course there's "That Chapter" as well.  Hope this helps you find something you enjoy

@christian yup, many more videos of his on the “J C S” channel, and even on here but they’re unlisted, just type in this yt channels name and you’ll find playlists full of more videos than the one shown on this channel

ME TOO.....I would seriously cheer if JCS returned

@christian matt orchard 10000% look him up, best JCS like by far. Offers so much more than many of the copycats.

are their any other channels like this? I just got into true crime and all that

They just announced they're done, unfortunately 😔. Youtube has demonizing every video isn't to their benefit 😕

@SquidPW check their community tab posts

@SquidPW check their community tab posts

@Scott Baker
Oh I know.
I'm just pointing out that the "youtube bad" excuse given has basically been proven to be a load of shit.

@Vito Torpedo I don’t blame him though, he owes us nothing and the content he has is good enough

The narrator is just the narrator. Jcs was a team not a person lmao….

@Melissa Coulter Hosting fees are what you pay to Patreon to keep your content on their platform. JCS isn’t just one person, it’s a group of people and the ex Patreon members seem to think they got greedy and couldn’t agree on how to split the money fairly, so they are at an impasse when it comes to continuing with their content.

@Charlie Brown what are hosting fees? It’s seems just as stupid as the idiots being interrogated in these videos because for someone who can make a very good living off of literally narrating an already made video(interrogation) which doesn’t seem like it would be incredibly time consuming and back breaking to just decide to stop when clearly the potential for an outstanding amount of money to be made seeing as some of these videos are viewed in the tens of millions!!

@Charlie Brown
He took all that patreon money and ran, it's blatantly obvious.
Youtube isn't "giving him problems", he's just done with the channel but won't admit it.

Views started reaching like 80 million and he just bounced.

It’s not necessarily YT. According to a Reddit thread, JCS started pulling videos off their own Patreon over a year ago saying the hosting fees were too high. Meanwhile according to the Reddit posters, hosting fees were only a few hundred dollars and they had 40k subscribers each paying at least 1 USD a month. You do the math. Allegedly when people called them out on it they deleted messages and blocked users. This all seems very odd.

@Adam not upset I'm just saying of youtube had a problem with it than why is it up on other channels

@Blissey why are you upset I noticed a pattern?

@Kaylee Ayres notice the only videos up. It's YouTube being racial


The fact that this guy feels the need to say "negative" instead of "no" after every question, just shows how hard he's trying to sound smart

@Sofian because he's trying to sound like a buddy to the cops. He also uses military lingo when he has never served. It's almost like he learned about those words that day and was going to use them to the fullest extent. Soooo negative sir, it's affirmative this guy is peepee poopoo

How saying "negative" instead of "no" makes someone sounds smart?

I think he’s more trying to sound/feel like he’s one of them, talk in the cop talk he’s heard on TV, give himself this air of professionalism, he was just doing his job, defending his gas station. And I think he wants very badly to feel like a cop

@Bossman Biden bruh you can’t even spell, why should anyone listen to what you have to say. Not to mention your username.

@Michael if a stranger is arguing with your wife over a parking space, has not threatened physical harm or acted upon it in any way (court documents and evidence show this was the case here, even in Jacobs' own testimony), you DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASSAULT THEM. Had McGlockton not been killed, he would have had assault charges at the very least. You have the right to verbally intervene with the man, but you cannot approach and attack him out of nowhere.

Nothing to do with him trying to sound smart. He's trying to use cop/military talk, which negative falls into.

@Michael to be fair, intervening is not just quickly closing the distance and assaulting. Regardless of the law, dude would still be alive had he kept his hands to himself

@Bossman Biden someone is arguing with your wife and you immediately spring to violence?  Well, that would make you a criminal.  That’s assault, and regardless how blameless you want to make the victims actions, assaulting a man who’s having words with your wife is the behaviour of a thug, it’s not reasonable.  This isn’t to say the victim deserved to die, but it could have been completely avoided if he didn’t immediately spring to assault.  <br>Nobody here seriously believes that was a reasonable reaction, but they are pretending it is, so that they can maintain the victim/oppressor narrative.

@Bossman Biden someone is arguing with your wife and you immediately spring to violence?  Well, that would make you a criminal.  That’s assault, and regardless how blameless you want to make the victims actions, assaulting a man who’s having words with your wife is the behaviour of a thug, it’s not reasonable.  This isn’t to say the victim deserved to die, but it could have been completely avoided if he didn’t immediately spring to assault.
Nobody here seriously believes that was a reasonable reaction, but they are pretending it is, so that they can maintain the victim/oppressor narrative.

@Michael And by intervene you mean physically push someone and escalate the situation? How did that turn out for Markeis? Jacobs was not in any immediate danger and was inside her car. Markeis could have simply walked into the car and both could have driven off without incident. Unfortunately, Markeis pushed a hot headed individual who took SYG literally, got shot and died. Although I'm not blaming Markeis or Jacobs for what occurred, all could have been avoided if they would have parked in a different spot as well.

He’s a wannabe police officer. When the judge gave reason for his 20 year sentence not the home probation the defense attorneys were requesting was so on point.

@Jek True. But you probably already know what they say about "military intelligence" (it's an oxymoron). Probably still better than saying "Yeah" and "Nah" because both are one single syllable. Personally if I'm listening to a call go out over the radio and all I heard was the last syllable the next thing I'm going to say over the radio is "10-9" or "Say again, you're coming in 10-1; no copy". If I heard them clearly I'm still going to confirm "10-4, I copy that's a NEGATIVE". Just to be clear - IF it's about something super important... like coffee.

@liquidbraino If the point is temporal clarity, wouldn't it be better to not use two words that both end in -ive? lol. If you catch the tail end of affirmative or negative they sound the same. It strikes me that "yes yes" and "no no" might be better for that task

@Bossman Biden I'm in control of my actions that's why I will escalate an incident with someone who could be capable of anything"

Also "proper force", lmao the internet matcho man.

@Bossman Biden my thing is this. If someone is verbally assaulting your family, they’re clearly unhinged. Why would you then escalate. You say no one is responsible for their reactions but themselves. Turning a verbal confrontation into a physical one is escalation at its finest.

@811chelseafc don't need your help chelse...

@Bossman Biden if you don’t see how that behavior can so easily lead to escalation I can’t help you.

@811chelseafc if someone is verbally assaulting my family I'm going to assault them with proper force and he's not just "a scumbag",he's a convicted murderer... As a grown man I've come to realize no one makes you have any reaction, your in control of that.

@Michael his choice of intervention was to assault him without warning. Mike is a scumbag for his reaction but it was a reaction. Always use your words first if nothing else but to have the excuse of “well I tried to talk it out with him first”

@liquidbraino that’s really interesting and I did not know the latter part of that.

I wouldn't say he's trying to seem "smart". He's trying to sound like law enforcement or military and I'm sure you know what people say about "Military Intelligence" (it's an oxymoron). Basically he's trying to talk like a cop/military to build rapport.

I don't know if the guy ever served in the military but that's just how we talk over a radio for the purpose of clarity. Yes and no are both single syllable meaning a split second of RFI can prevent clear reception - so we use "Affirmative" and "Negative" instead. Over static it's easier to tell the difference.

Same reason we use a phonetic alphabet over the radio because the letters "A", "J", "K" all rhyme; letters "B", "C", "D", "E", "G", "P", "T", "V" and "Z" all rhyme and can be mistaken. Instead we use Alpha Charlie Delta Echo Golf Papa - each one sounds distinctly different and that matters when lives are at stake.

Call in the wrong grid coordinates to DIVARTY and you might hit the wrong sector & take out an entire platoon of Rangers. I literally heard exactly that... ALMOST happen one year while on a CAX at 29 Palms. We were in the middle of nowhere; hot as hell; bored as fuck and guarding something I couldn't even see for HOURS. Just making sure nobody passed us on that road and didn't even know why. Our only entertainment was the FM radio so when I heard these excited calls coming over the radio my ears perked up; I sat up in my seat.


When you carry a firearm, you NEVER instigate a conflict. Any fight you participate in becomes a deadly encounter as soon as you pull a gun out. Your job is to avoid confrontations and deescalate as much as possible. Pulling a gun out is your last resort in the face of a threat to you, your family, or your property. If you’re no longer in danger, you no longer have a legal reason to use that firearm.

This guy was looking for a fight so he could live out his mall ninja fantasy and therefore did every single one of those things wrong.

@Dangerous Dru I was a Paralegal for eight years. I've heard a lot of "long stories". Usually it's people breaking the law and honestly just getting upset that they were held to task. There are bad cops out there, sure, same as there are bad plumbers and bad office workers, but it's hardly the majority.

@Spades 75 yes dude a hundred percent! Then people ask what they did and all he says is "long story." If they were shot for no reason that's a pretty short story lmao.

@Dangerous Dru it's almost like people think that it's not the criminals fault that they break into your house. Like they can't control it, you won't get shot if you stay out of my stuff! Easy, I avoid getting shot by doing this everyday. Here, a little guide, step 1) notice other persons stuff, step 2) leave other persons stuff alone, step 3) no shooting occurs. Look how nice I am, I didn't even ask for money for that!<br>Also, the guy saying that 3 family members just so happened to get killed by cops while totally, no seriously, take my word for it, were not doing anything illegal, I am above and beyond skeptical that they weren't doing quite a lot wrong.

@Dangerous Dru it's almost like people think that it's not the criminals fault that they break into your house. Like they can't control it, you won't get shot if you stay out of my stuff! Easy, I avoid getting shot by doing this everyday. Here, a little guide, step 1) notice other persons stuff, step 2) leave other persons stuff alone, step 3) no shooting occurs. Look how nice I am, I didn't even ask for money for that!
Also, the guy saying that 3 family members just so happened to get killed by cops while totally, no seriously, take my word for it, were not doing anything illegal, I am above and beyond skeptical that they weren't doing quite a lot wrong.

@Captain Price oh no reason except to protect you and your family. Your property. Imagine captain price with no gun lmao

@Captain Price oh no reason except to protect you and your family. Your property. Imagine captain price with no gun lmao

@Spliffed to The Gallows a humans rights are also important. The right to own and protect property. I don't care about your pathetic life if your trying to break in my house. I don't care if your homeless. I don't care if your starving. If you break in, I'm feeding you lead.

Kinda like in Super when he beats the shit out of a guy with a plumbing wrench for cutting in line.

Kinda like in Super when he beats the shit out of a guy with a plumbing wrench for cutting in line.

@keegan johnson Of course they were :-).

@keegan johnson Of course they were :-).

@rain tree I'm pretty sure if you killed someone for burning down your house you would go to jail.

@rain tree I'm pretty sure if you killed someone for burning down your house you would go to jail.

Having a conversation in a parking lot is NOT "instigating" nor is it illegal.  Getting pushed off your feet is definitely illegal and justified Drejka's heroic act.  Bet them thugs in that neighborhood thinkin' twice before layin hands.

Great system.  Now, as long as everyone is disciplined and mature then the “everyone has a gun” world works.  Sadly that isn’t reality, so you’ll have never ending tragedy, forever.

Was he the one that started the physical altercation? No, that was the black

Was he the one that started the physical altercation? No, that was the black

if you've seen the CCTV and have heard testimony of McGlockton's girlfriend (Jacobs), this is a more complex case than you make it out to be. It's true that Drejka is an idiot, wanna-be cop who murdered someone in the second degree as they were retreating from him. But it's also true that you are still allowed to initiate a disagreement with someone regardless of whether you're carrying. Such a verbal confrontation in and of itself is not a crime. You are not permitted to attack someone who is arguing with your girlfriend, even if it's over something petty or you feel he's in the wrong. Jacobs never testified that Drejka physically threatened her or acted in any way that would make a reasonable person feel as though her life or that of another was in danger. Additionally, she was in the driver seat of a vehicle, with the key, and she even opened her door and exited beside Drejka as McGlockton approached from the side. These aren't actions a person who fears for her life and the lives of her kids takes. On the contrary, it was she who threatened earlier to "get her man", which although not constituting all that imminent a threat by itself, clearly and reasonably can be thought of as a threat of harm in some regard. Both men made poor choices. And when you say "pulling a gun out is your last resort in the face of a threat to you", I agree. I would consider being tackled to the ground one of those instances. Firing upon someone who then retreats is of course another thing entirely.

The other guy instigated the fight. Legally, Drejka was in the wrong. Morally, I give him a pass. Don’t assault people. Dumbass thought he could attack someone without consequences. Stupid games, stupid prizes.

@keegan johnson can we get the names of those three family members? I’d like to investigate this.

@keegan johnson can we get the names of those three family members? I’d like to investigate this.

This is a great argument for requiring gun owners to know what they are doing...

This is a great argument for requiring gun owners to know what they are doing...

@Captain Price You saying this is so damn ironic I’m convinced you’re a bot

@Captain Price You saying this is so damn ironic I’m convinced you’re a bot

@Seahawkblazing "bad moments we had with cops". What bad moment did you have with cops?

@Seahawkblazing "bad moments we had with cops". What bad moment did you have with cops?

@jacksobrooks one thing I will agree with is people do act like it’s worse now more then ever and that’s cuz of body cams and we can see with our own two eyes and it enrages the people who have went through it. Makes them relive the bad moments we had with cops. It’s not worse but it’s being filmed is all. Now everyone can see!

@jacksobrooks would you make the same statement about the blatant extortion and abuse of civilians rights that occur on a daily basis! I guarantee you it’s way over half who conduct business in this manner! Furthermore the other ones don’t say anything for a band of brothers mentality and which has plagued many ugly instances in our armed forces and police brutality! The system is very broken and almost designed for cops and civilians to not get a long. I have seen some good cops so let’s be clear but the bad far outweigh the good! If it wasn’t for peoples story’s on here that show how their rights were abused then I wouldn’t of learned. Saying you just don’t think its not happening is not listening to people who have gone through it. We can tell our stories but until people choose to believe it to fit their narrative because they don’t wanna believe it.

@jacksobrooks actually you hit the nail right on the head buddy 🙂 good work 🙄💀

@jacksobrooks actually you hit the nail right on the head buddy 🙂 good work 🙄💀

@jacksobrooks it doesn’t matter why. They were murdered

@jacksobrooks it doesn’t matter why. They were murdered

Imagine a world, In a developed country, in 2022, where some people carry firearms, and need all this self defence BS.

Imagine a world, In a developed country, in 2022, where some people carry firearms, and need all this self defence BS.

@keegan johnson Long stories are usually full of embellishments. Sorry for your loss, but sounds like it's a bit of a trend in your family. Much more likely that you've got a shitty family than for 3 separate mistakes to be made to the same family. That's just basic statistics. I've had many encounters with police, survived them all just fine.

@Ethan CR This comment needs to be higher up!  So many people are calling him completely justified in the situation, not realizing that he is telling his story in a way that isn't entirely honest.

I personally don't love guns and don't plan on ever owning one, but I love it when gun owners are responsible and understand what it means to carry a firearm

Exactly, never pull your weapon, unless you intend to use it.  And you better be right.  This guy was looking for an excuse to use his weapon.  A real jerk.

Exactly, never pull your weapon, unless you intend to use it.  And you better be right.  This guy was looking for an excuse to use his weapon.  A real jerk.

He got assaulted plain and simple. Yea he shouldn’t have shot him, but when you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes. Both won stupid prizes.

He got assaulted plain and simple. Yea he shouldn’t have shot him, but when you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes. Both won stupid prizes.

@CEREAL KILLER But it doesn’t work that way..if you are justified in drawing your gun that means you are in fear of your life because that is the ONLY reason to draw your gun.

@Carinae Psychotic worldview. Attemptying to justify somebody using lethal force against a person who is backing away is just next level. I'll add the lmao as well, just to make myself seem cooler. lmao.

Yeah, not like the dude pulled up his shorts the minute he exited the store, preparing himself for physical conflict. He pushed the guy, whatever happens next is on him. It's one thing arguing with another person, but if you physically assault someone and end up shot, thats your problem lmao.

Too many cowboy movies, not enough common sense.

Too many cowboy movies, not enough common sense.

This is an important statement. I watched recently a man shoot his girlfriends ex husband over her not letting the father see his kids. It was a argument in front of a house and the BF felt a gun was necessary even tho the father was unarmed and he shot the father bc the father approached him to, likely disarm him but he killed him and was never charged due to self defense. Had they just called the cops those kids would still have a dad and not a murderer for a step dad.

You can’t shoot someone if they’re destroying your property. Prolly some 13yo kid who’s dad took a conceal deadly weapons class.

You can’t shoot someone if they’re destroying your property. Prolly some 13yo kid who’s dad took a conceal deadly weapons class.

@BambooScar well you need to wake up and actually read the facts of the case before spouting off. You're not better than the cult of the woke members if not.

@BambooScar well you need to wake up and actually read the facts of the case before spouting off. You're not better than the cult of the woke members if not.

@BambooScar ah, so you didn't watch any of the trial, look at any of the facts for that case. Good job. Stay woke.

@BambooScar ah, so you didn't watch any of the trial, look at any of the facts for that case. Good job. Stay woke.

Kinda like Kyle Rittenhouse went in with a weapon to a hostile scene and instigated the shooting and claimed self defense.

Kinda like Kyle Rittenhouse went in with a weapon to a hostile scene and instigated the shooting and claimed self defense.

Absolutely right. I might even take it a step further and say it's not even worth it to protect your property. In my area recently there was a guy who saw some thieves taking the catalytic converter off of his car. He approached them with his firearm telling them to stop, but they were armed as well and then a gunfight took place. Guy was killed over a catalytic converter, not worth it if you ask me. I'll only result to violence to protect myself or others, property can be replaced

@Rodney Smith nah they were stopped and murdered for going 1 mph over the speed limit. They didn't do anything wrong, cops just let the rounds fly as soon as he stopped.

@keegan johnson lmao what a stupid statement 😂😂😂 but it made me laugh tho

@keegan johnson lmao what a stupid statement 😂😂😂 but it made me laugh tho

@Rodney Smith you don't have to obey an unlawful order

@Rodney Smith you don't have to obey an unlawful order

@keegan johnson And I am sure they were stopped while helping little old ladies across the street and then complied with every request the cop made.

@keegan johnson And I am sure they were stopped while helping little old ladies across the street and then complied with every request the cop made.

@keegan johnson there's more to the story than that

@keegan johnson there's more to the story than that

@Captain Price Freedom over safety if you want to be safe live in a cage

@Captain Price Freedom over safety if you want to be safe live in a cage

@Spliffed to The Gallows <br> If we use history as a barometer then property is far more valuable than life. It doesn't mean it's a great lesson in morality, but it's true that most wars cost lives, and are fought over resources (property.) As proof I would argue that battles are named for real estate, for example it's "the Somme." History forgets the name of even a single one of the 1M combatants who died.

@Spliffed to The Gallows
 If we use history as a barometer then property is far more valuable than life. It doesn't mean it's a great lesson in morality, but it's true that most wars cost lives, and are fought over resources (property.) As proof I would argue that battles are named for real estate, for example it's "the Somme." History forgets the name of even a single one of the 1M combatants who died.

@ethan
TBF, your previous comment read: "if someone’s on your property in most states you’re allowed to shoot them." But you can't (or at least shouldn't legally be able to) shoot someone for just being on your property. And I was responding to that. But yes, there's more to it than just that. However, I think it could lead to a lot of gray area or slippery slopes. For example, there's a case where a drunk woman steals a literal Nazi flag from a Nazi's trailer, and he shoots at her multiple times and by some miracle doesn't kill her. People are actually justifying his reaction, tho.

@ethan
TBF, your previous comment read: "if someone’s on your property in most states you’re allowed to shoot them." But you can't (or at least shouldn't legally be able to) shoot someone for _just being_ on your property. And I was responding to that. But yes, there's more to it than just that. However, I think it could lead to a lot of gray area or slippery slopes. For example, there's a case where a drunk woman steals a literal Nazi flag from a Nazi's trailer, and he shoots at her multiple times and by some miracle doesn't kill her. People are actually justifying his reaction, tho.

@The Great Pumpkin No there is definitely other features to it, you have to be put in danger or feel your life is being threatened. so no obv you can’t kill the kid getting his ball but if he pulls out a strap he gettin smoked

@ethan
Regardless of what you claim the law allows, you shouldn't be able to just shoot someone simply for being on your property. There should have to be other variables that actually present some danger to your physical well being before you go that far in self-defense. But I'm pretty sure if some kid is retrieving a ball from your lawn, you can't get away with gunning them down.

@ethan
Regardless of what you claim the law allows, you shouldn't be able to just shoot someone simply for _being_ on your property. There should have to be other variables that actually present some danger to your physical well being before you go that far in self-defense. But I'm pretty sure if some kid is retrieving a ball from your lawn, you can't get away with gunning them down.

Pulling the gun is one thing, firing it is another. You can pull just be sure its for the right reasons. And no, a fist fight isnt a reason.

Pulling the gun is one thing, firing it is another. You can pull just be sure its for the right reasons. And no, a fist fight isnt a reason.

@Mr.Krabbb i thought so to. He had time to think, as he saw the gunman and his wife was quarreling and approaching. An ordinary person would walk up and ask what's wrong first. One thing lead to another, and I'm sure had he talked, the firearm would less likely to be pull out.

@jacksobrooks i can understand the viewpoint (but to clarify i dont really agree 100%, i just can see where he and others are coming from). some people in my family have had bad run-ins with cops, especially one who was beat up really badly by police while he was defenseless. and just recently we got screwed over by a cop who didnt want to do his job after my little brother got jumped in a bathroom and had his phone taken. but i personally havent had any bad encounters with cops knock on wood

Politely informing somebody they are parked in the handicapped spot is a decent gesture and even a moral obligation towards the community. The thing is that almost nobody in the world (sadly) will admit to being wrong and correct their mistake, so you better be ready to go on with your life or even accept some hard words from such people (as seen in Cart Narcs). Normally the situation should have ended (even after Drejka was shoved to the ground) in the worst case for the couple, with a parking ticket and a few hard stares. Instead, Drejka's actions were led by anger and ego (since the first moment really) and causd  the death of a person. Drejka is guilty but things are not black and white.<br>Edit: I watched a bit more of the video, I fully agreed with the prosecution, justified in pulling the gun, unjustified in pulling the trigger.

Politely informing somebody they are parked in the handicapped spot is a decent gesture and even a moral obligation towards the community. The thing is that almost nobody in the world (sadly) will admit to being wrong and correct their mistake, so you better be ready to go on with your life or even accept some hard words from such people (as seen in Cart Narcs). Normally the situation should have ended (even after Drejka was shoved to the ground) in the worst case for the couple, with a parking ticket and a few hard stares. Instead, Drejka's actions were led by anger and ego (since the first moment really) and causd  the death of a person. Drejka is guilty but things are not black and white.
Edit: I watched a bit more of the video, I fully agreed with the prosecution, justified in pulling the gun, unjustified in pulling the trigger.

Well he was just arguing with the lady. Technically her man instigated the whole thing when he put his hands on the other man. However that doesn’t make it right to shoot the man. He was not in any imminent danger. Nobody won this one. Sad outcome.

TBF, The boyfriend shouldn't have pushed him down, he should have slowly walked up and just asked what was going on what they were yelling. Instead he chose to attack Michael.

Maybe don't have a gun. There really is no justifiable reason to have one.

Maybe don't have a gun. There really is no justifiable reason to have one.

@keegan johnson Wow. Sorry that happened.

@keegan johnson Wow. Sorry that happened.

You have the best comment on this stream. You have common sense and a good sense of reality.

You have the best comment on this stream. You have common sense and a good sense of reality.

@Spliffed to The Gallows Even if someone was in the process of burning your house down....?

@Spliffed to The Gallows Even if someone was in the process of burning your house down....?

Agree with everything but the property part. Property is never more valuable than a life

Agree with everything but the property part. Property is never more valuable than a life

Very thought out and intelligent comment.....

Very thought out and intelligent comment.....

@keegan johnson I understand, but you did bring it up. I just don't think that every cop or even close to half of them are chomping at the bit to kill "anyone everyday" as you said.

@jacksobrooks all three are long stories.

@jacksobrooks all three are long stories.

@Ethan CR agreed.. dude was looking for an excuse so he could feel powerful.

@Ethan CR agreed.. dude was looking for an excuse so he could feel powerful.

This. People probably don't know, but in the same year this man threatened four other people with his gun over traffic/parking incidences and also caused a crash with a mother and two children with aggressive driving and break checking. He was waiting for this.

@jacksobrooks 2 were shot one was beaten to death on Christmas.

@jacksobrooks 2 were shot one was beaten to death on Christmas.

@jacksobrooks lmao. It is truly luck. I've had 3 family members murdered by the police. I wouldn't call it hunting, as much as I would say it's extorting at gun point.

@keegan johnson yea I wonder how you survived this long with those cops hunting you. It's nuts.

@keegan johnson yea I wonder how you survived this long with those cops hunting you. It's nuts.

Unless you're a cop, then do it to anyone everyday.

Unless you're a cop, then do it to anyone everyday.


So, handicap spot or not, does anybody else think that a random man pulling up and immediately circling around a woman in her car with her kids might come across as a little creepy?

He's actually threatened a woman and her kids with a gun for...driving too slowly in a 15mph school zone.

Man is a habitual road rager who thought his gun made him king of the road.

@Publio Virgilio while he parked illegally himself..like I'm sorry he wasn't even handicap himself so why is he even looking for it..

@Maryland marijuana review Ok. Well have a nice day.

@Looking 4 Things lol i dont care about others but also dont want to get ripped out of my ride and beat to death. This does happen every day and im not just talking about hurt feelings.

@Maryland marijuana review  Funny I dont consider your comment stream to be very respectful to others. Just saying.

@Looking 4 Things its about respecting and acknowledging that there are other drivers on the road. Theres no reason anyones driving should effect anyone elses journey if we all did what we were supposed to do.  Thank god my grandmother doesnt drive but she can barely walk and the distance in that video would have taken her 30 mins to do on her own and thats with a good spot.

@Maryland marijuana review  I'll never park near you.

@happyfacefries I agree. Drejka was a jerk and he is right where he should be.

So was anyone handicapped in the vehicle? Or what was the reason they parked there in the first place?

@Aaron King Timestamps for any of these claims? Also do you even know what the word "prude" means? Why do you sound so fatherless and mad Aaron? Got some problems irl? Got something you wanna share with us?

He didn’t even circle the car you prude, he very obviously was trying to look at the plates.

It’s not any less creepy than a random woman pulling up and immediately circling around a man in his car with his kids. Stop creep exaggerating. The kids weren’t even in the car with her, they went into the store with the father.

@Publio Virgilio "Something normal" like arguing with a woman seconds before you murder her boyfriend. Yknow, normal stuff.

@Looking 4 Things doesn't matter if was illegal. There was no need to go policing the place

Yes. And his car was parked closer to the station so it's not like he was even affected at all by it.

In fairness i do let people know about their bad driving or parking but i keep my distance and typically start with do you need medical assistance?  Then why the F are you driving/ parking like that. That being said i try very hard to not approach someone in a car as i know when folks rush my window i have pepper spray and other ready to engage the conflict.

@Publio Virgilio In my opinion there were much better ways to handle that concern than him encircling the car and escalating things himself from there. I think that at a certain point things should've been left to actual law enforcement, not some random guy wanting to play cop. At least if it's actual law enforcement inspecting my car and getting awfully close to my kids, I'd know what the intentions are.

I think that this guy wanted to take out some of his frustrations on his own by initiating this conflict. Maybe he didn't go in with the intent to kill, but he certainly had the intent to start an altercation of some kind.

End of the day, what a petty reason for anyone to die. A parking space.

@Herbert West I'm split a little in this case. Both men made very bad choices. Drejka should have at most tapped on her window and said it's a restricted spot, chose more productive words for a reminder that its selfish behavior exploiting the handicaps of others. Perhaps tell the clerk about it if she's nasty in response or refuses to move. McGlockton should have de-escalated the situation and refrained from brazenly assaulting someone over a verbal argument. Drejka never made any specific threats of harm-- yes, he acted aggressively and inappropriately, and he's an idiot wanna-be cop. But why would a woman who felt like her life and kid's lives were potentially in danger, when she's the driver of the vehicle she's sitting in, open her door and get out beside Drejka? I never heard any evidence that he spoke words or took action that constituted an immediate threat to her or anyone else. I've had crazies and assholes approach me in public and get my heart racing, and guess what? Regardless or whether or not I'm armed, I de-escalate with words or leave the area if it only gets worse. I feel that by unconditionally supporting McGlockton because of Drejka's mistakes, you send those who listen and agree with you a message that it's ok to attack people in public if they're arguing with you or a loved one, and that the best course of action is to escalate situations like this. It's toxic behavior that gets people seriously hurt and killed. And even if the other party was in the wrong, does it matter when you're dead? Black leaders especially need to be sending this message to their communities, but instead seem to send the opposite: that you can do to people whatever you want if they start an argument with you. That culture of taking these situations into your own hands is causing generational trauma, harm, increasing violence and death. But I suppose we'll keep pointing the finger elsewhere...

@Porky I'm not saying that drejka did right, he is a murderer and he payed for his crime. But that fact doesn't delete the bad decisions the family made. They didn't care about an eventual handicapped persona and the man chose instant violence instead of speaking or calling the police like you said.

@Publio Virgilio It very much <i>does</i> matter how Drejka's actions were interpreted, which is why several witnesses were called at trial to testify as to what they saw and heard between Drejka and Marquis' wife, and they all said he was loud and threatening. They even made mention of the confrontation when they went into the store to the owner which alerted Marquis as to what was happening.

@Publio Virgilio It very much _does_ matter how Drejka's actions were interpreted, which is why several witnesses were called at trial to testify as to what they saw and heard between Drejka and Marquis' wife, and they all said he was loud and threatening. They even made mention of the confrontation when they went into the store to the owner which alerted Marquis as to what was happening.

@Publio Virgilio Yes it does, at least if you have some sense of self-preservation when confronting strangers and managing the sort of reaction you elicit from them. Or at least understand the responsibility that you have as a gun owner to avoid escalating to lethal force.

He could also have spoken to a store clerk or called the police.

@Looking 4 Things it also doesn't matter if the spot was legal or not, the thing is that the family parked in that spot, they wouldn't know it wasn't legal, they did wrong. The black man was stupid for pushing someone from a blindspot, and of course the shooter did absolutely wrong for shooting him to death, but it is true that he could have feared for his life. There is no need to divide  people in good and bad, they were all wrong.

@Publio Virgilio The handicapped spot was not legal. The town did not approve of it. Drejka was parked illegally and shot another man because he thought he had a right. It was not normal for any rational human being.

It doesn't matter if it comes to you as creepy. He was indeed looking for a plate, which is something normal if you are concerned about people missusing the handicap spot.

@Roger The Shrubber Id be scared with my babies. People are crazy


This man was involved in 4 prior road rage incidents where he threatened drivers with a gun. He was looking for a reason to finally pull the trigger.


It’s amazing how quickly his “soreness” went away while he was alone and then returned when the officers returned.

It was ridiculous for him to even say he was hurt and insane for him to act like he did after having literally just having shot someone in the chest with a gun!!


If I had my kids and wife in the car, and some creep started walking around staring at my car I would be on full alarm too. The dad walking out not knowing what was going on, I’m sure he was also on full alarm. All of this is due to this guys ego, and his over inflated sense of justice.

@Sittie Nakan if some guy is harassing  a man's family I think a push would not be a over reaction with  how stuff like this usually plays out a fight would breakout I feel as if we as Americans have belief of our right to fuck people up or just kill them for minors things which i<br> why situations like this are so common here all the guns floating around just makes things that would usually end in a beating more deadly then they would in other countries just reading some of the comments here believing this man desreved to die over a push just soldifys my belief

@Sittie Nakan if some guy is harassing  a man's family I think a push would not be a over reaction with  how stuff like this usually plays out a fight would breakout I feel as if we as Americans have belief of our right to fuck people up or just kill them for minors things which i
 why situations like this are so common here all the guns floating around just makes things that would usually end in a beating more deadly then they would in other countries just reading some of the comments here believing this man desreved to die over a push just soldifys my belief

@Herbert West I really don't think just shoving a man like that is good or defending your family. Maybe if he was actually threatening or it seemed like he was already about to get in, then yeah. If what the father did was shitty, then what Drejka did was pure evil. Again, shoving a man like that is a shitty move, unless the man was punching the car already, and I'm not justifying what Drejka did at all.

Also they mentioned Dreka had a history of pulling out a weapon on 4 unarmed people (2 men, 2 women) in the past. His firearm should’ve been stripped from him a long time ago

Drejka didn't confront the woman calmly either. Several people that pulled up to the store and got out of their cars as the confrontation was happening actually made comments to the store owner and Marquis about how loud and aggressive Drejka was. They testified to this at the trial. It was a very heated exchange. Marquis was defending his family like any man would do.


Crazy you haven't even been at it for a year and you're outclassing most content creators I can think of. Keep up the good work, Jim!

@TahitianTreat SkeetJuice why they demonizing for?

And for good reason. I can't stand most other channels in general and their failed cringe attempts at comedy every other sentence. It's like they r so excited narrating that they think they can become comedians or something. 🙄

he stopped because youtube started demonetizing his videos. they did it to the newer channels as well. YT ruined it....

@Gregor Samsa He stopped doing videos man

This aged like cheese... I'm sorry @JCS that YT fucked you up :(

At this point they need to create their own independent website were you can subscribe for their content. I will not give any money to patreon and would enjoy watching more of their content than what they offer on youtube. Also, what's with the pizza slice and the name latenight lowlife? A lot of people know what pizza means these days. Hopefully you're not involved in that or you will get what's coming to you.

@what stars really look like good ol haters

Dad TV Time

lol no doubt. And that's just $1,800 something if everyone pledged a dollar. Not taking into account all the ten dollar pledgers.
And yeah, I think Jim puts everything together, then has Kizzume do the reading.

I'm a big fan of this channel as well. Every video so far has been quality. 👍

CrypticRaps wow that’s so much money a year! 😳🤯

Bradley H That’s incorrect information. This is all Jim.

Potent Beauty That’s not correct. It’s all Jim.

CantStopCor The Goat

Yeah, he's banking off of Patreon. I'm happy to be a dollar of the $18,000+ he's making every month 😂

Your absolutely correct. He’s been doing it since day one is the crazy part!

If you're not already subbed on Patreon, and can afford it, I'd highly recommend that too, some great videos on there that aren't on here.

@Turtle NFTS 🐢 yes and I'm glad the team is making some serious cash cause patreon. I've been with em since day one and will be till the last day!

@Anti - Ethnic Cleansing It is because I'm supporting my favourite youtuber who's content has flourished on Patreon due to our support. Don't hate, Be happy.

My 1 dollar is being spent well on his patreon. Such good content

$10 is almost a year, treat yourself. Life too short and you been doing work recently IRL ( i feel )

Oh hes at it... for 1 dollar a month you can have over 30 JCS videos you haven't seen that are usually an hour long and involve way more disturbing content ;) SERIOUSLY worth it for a measly $1 a month...

Potent Beauty good work from all of them

That's because this. Channel is made up of a few other content creators. It's not just one person. Love it all the same.


Hearing drejka say he "neutralized" a man who was clearly backing up made me really mad.


Imagine a cop tells you that somebody has died because of you, and your response is "thank you for telling me that" instead of "im so sorry to hear that". Really shows how egocentric he is

I think most reasonable people would have lost their mind if they found out they killed a man over an unused parking spot in front of his   The level of grief would be too much to bare to continue with the interview.


People freak out about handicapped parking.  I lost a leg several years ago and often wear a prosthetic.  Now and then I will use handicapped parking and even with the Florida tag endorsement I've been verbally attacked for parking in a spot designated for me to park at because I don't look handicapped enough.   Folks need to learn to let police handle police matters.

This is absolutely absurd to hear, the nerve of some people


So sad that he cried over missing his dogs, but he had no reaction when he was told that he took the life of another human being. Lord, what kind of world has this become?

@Brandon Massey It’s obvious that is his personal reaction. My point is that it is sad for anyone in this world to react that way.

What does his personal reaction have to do with the rest of the world?

Not to mention he said he didn't need or want to change the scenario....

@Muskoka Mike He did have the right to defend himself, but if he chose to respond with deadly force then there would be a burden of proof he must meet that he genuinely felt his life was in danger.

@sam grant I did watch the video and many people are arrested who haven't committed a crime. He was convicted due to his mindset of almost going out to look for something like this to happen.

In many other places, he wouldn't even be arrested in the first place. "stand your ground" laws and all.

If you think a person isn't supposed to defend themselves when attacked, you should come up to Canada. Here if someone is breaking into our house and we stop them we get arrested too. If someone attacks us on the street and we defend ourselves, the same: we get arrested.

The point you all are missing is: you don't turn a verbal argument into a physical one because you never know if the other person is going to pull out a gun and defend themselves.

@Muskoka Mike so did u not watch the video and pay attention? he went to jail because the evidence was clear that he did not need to take someones life. at MOST all he needed to do was pull out his gun and scare the other guy off.

@Overly Aggressive Machine "I don't think" ...you could have stopped there.

You DO have the right to defend yourself and if you believed it wasn't over you DO have the right to shoot the attacker.

Obviously you don't know your rights, which is a shame.

@Muskoka Mike He killed someone after getting shoved. I got fucking sucker punched in the gut in highschool, I dont think I had the RIGHT to shoot the guy, and I still dont think so to this day.

I know. That guy Mike Dunn who shot the teen at another store, cried about his dog while on the stand. Not one tear for the teen. Crazy people

@christian No, he killed someone because he was attacked. He got into an argument with the WIFE over a parking spot.

not just took a life but took a father away from his kids. I've seen some terrible things on this channel. obviously the guy that killed his family and the Casey Anthony case. but this one is infuriating for a whole other reason that being I cant believe how stupid it is. he killed someone over a parking spot. this is so bad I'm actually going to spell it out instead of using the the acronym: SHAKING MY DAMN HEAD

But your above it all aren't you. Never mind that most of the things that you own were built in sweatshops by children.


There was no chance he was going to ask to talk to a lawyer. This guy saw himself a cop basically, he was very happy to talk to the police and tell them what a good job he did. He probably thought they'd all take him out for a beer afterwards, and tell him that he could be fully in charge of that store parking lot from now on.

I think Drejka thought he was one of the guys and they thought as he did.

I think Drejka thought he was one of the guys and they thought as he did.

@Fox did you see the footage? he stared at the dude BACKING UP for MULTIPLE SECONDS

@Fox did you see the footage? he stared at the dude BACKING UP for MULTIPLE SECONDS

@tmas if you did read it whole, then you didn't really read into it. I thought my position was crystal clear, especially after my last conversation. I only stated that given his record, lack of information and the fact that he was attacked first, it's irresponsible to draw a conclusion that he is a cold-blooded murderer. I know it's easy to do so, but I literally said "it's not that simple" and people were triggered that I could even question their verdicts that were based on one video. They call me a defender of a murderer, even though my first comment read "what he did was wrong". That about sums it up, please, don't ask me anymore questions I already answered.

@Fox I did read the whole thread. You didn't answer to that question. You only said "Whatever".

@Fox I did read the whole thread. You didn't answer to that question. You only said "Whatever".

@tmas I already answered this, please read a thread.

@tmas I already answered this, please read a thread.

@Fox How it was illogical? Just did state facts you can hear in the video. Simple as that.

@Fox How it was illogical? Just did state facts you can hear in the video. Simple as that.

@tmas the thing is, I didn't find it logical. By the time I already explained my position, and it was either ignored or not understood by the commenter. I'm over this argument, I explained myself, do what you want with this.

@Fox You already lost this argument to everyone on this thread when you replied "Whatever" to a logical argument.

@Fox You already lost this argument to everyone on this thread when you replied "Whatever" to a logical argument.

@Jayda J I don't think instincts apply to civil people. The instinct to rape someone is natural, too, but rape is bad and no one supports it, so no one should support aggression either.

@Jayda J I don't think instincts apply to civil people. The instinct to rape someone is natural, too, but rape is bad and no one supports it, so no one should support aggression either.

@Fox it was the right thing to be aggressive because his daughter and partner were in the car and a random dude is shouting at them! Natural instinct to protect your family

@Fox it was the right thing to be aggressive because his daughter and partner were in the car and a random dude is shouting at them! Natural instinct to protect your family

@Fox Of course, and it's even worse when everyone dog piles without even reading the whole thread. Between 10-15 people just disregarded everything you said and questioned your pursuit for logic and frankly it was irritating. In a perfect world we wouldn't all be trying to cede power from one another and instead seek to understand and uplift one another but until then all we can do is try.

@Noah Martinez thank you for a good conversation. Sometimes it almost seems like people can only yell at each other and nice people get lost from the view. Sorry if it seemed that I was justifying killing someone, most of the time misunderstanding is the main problem in the argument.

@Fox Yup that's all I wanted, thank you for allowing me to see your point and sorry for everyone piling on you. Especially in cases like this it's easy to become blindsided by rage at the occurrence and hard to see someone else's perspective. There's a lot of truth to your words from my own perspective and these details are important. Have a good day

@Noah Martinez I feel bad about any form of violence and in this situation it seemed to me like a victim was an initiator of violence. I think every conflict can be dealt with with words and people who can't do that are responsible for their actions, and this includes death. I can't imagine pushing someone when there's no threat, but I can totally imagine getting pushed or kicked because someone is just getting agressive towards me, so it's easier for me to understand what might have been happening in the mind of the attacker then what was happening in the mind of an initiator. Once again, I might be wrong, which I already said a couple of times. But I feel like given the story I heard in the video, I might also not be, but nobody wants to acknowledge this. Is that what you wanted to know?

@Fox I have a question. Beyond the "objective lens" or devil's advocate approach, what is your personal opinion on the matter? Obviously he killed someone which we all agree was horrible but your stance seems to be that unlike what the video stages, the man was a mostly normal citizen that was thrust into a situation in which he made a bad call. Do you mind exploring how you feel about it? I'm not here to ridicule or point fingers

@Zach Johnson 1st the issue with your argument is the man is not a police officer nor an employee of said store . He has no right to approach a vehicle for any reasons other than to see if the driver is in need of assistance.  2nd  he had 4 cases of pulling his weapon out on people . 3rd if you walk out the store and see some random man yelling and cussing your significant other around your children , any man would immediately go into offense . He was the aggressor,  and now he's in jail getting a train ran on him 🤷

@Fox I’m gonna go out on a limb and say you’re definitely a seppo

@Fox I’m gonna go out on a limb and say you’re definitely a seppo

@Fox Tbh I couldn’t care less what you find funny because the rest of us are laughing at you

@Fox Tbh I couldn’t care less what you find funny because the rest of us are laughing at you

@Fox reading on, I’m glad everyone else seems to see sense here. You are clearly trying to justify this man’s actions (and trying weirdly hard to do so) for whatever reason. Thank god the rest of us aren’t as fucking stupid

@Sarah Nikas the only thing that is very clear is that he was attempting to enforce a law and in doing so he created a situation that resulted in a death.

@Sarah Nikas the only thing that is very clear is that he was attempting to enforce a law and in doing so he created a situation that resulted in a death.

@cj Hall confronting someone over handicap parking is stupid unless that person is intentionally preventing you from parking there when you have a legitimate need. Even then, you don’t know that they’re not allowed to park there.  Maybe you can’t see the placard or the disability.  My placard fell off the mirror a few times and I was ticketed, and I had to go and deal with enforcement and show I had the legal right to be there.  You could watch me walk from the vehicle to the building and not realize I have a legit disability, but I do.  I don’t think that’s the case here but none of this is anyone’s business unless they’re parking enforcement officers (or whatever that role is)  or they are harassing a person with a disability. If Drejka or you or anyone else came up and acted like this I might tell you to F off because I don’t have to answer your questions. Or I might lol and say the placard falls down but it’s current, enjoy your day. Depends on my mood and the way I’m approached. But you don’t know someone is a shit person based on what you can’t see, and that’s what is wrong with just getting up in someone’s face over a handicap parking spot.

@Fox LMAO imma go ahead and rub it in cuz I dont even need to say more, you lost that one chief. That was satisfying. Bravo William

@Fox LMAO imma go ahead and rub it in cuz I dont even need to say more, you lost that one chief. That was satisfying. Bravo William

@Fox Um...I do know what he was thinking before and after. The guy told the investigators. Are you saying he was lying or did you simply skip the parts in the video where he said he feared a kick and beating?

Actually no, I don't need to pull out a gun to feel big and strong. I don't own a gun and even if I did I would not be pulling and pointing it at people, because I feared being beaten up.

People might know him as calm, but his record says otherwise. He's pulled his gun on multiple people including women. A calm person would not do that. You can justify one incident of pulling a gun on someone, but 5 times? Where the fifth time ended with murdering another human being?

I'm seriously starting to wonder if you really watched the video. I'm not saying he's a psycho-murderer simply because the court said so. I watched him murder a person, try to cover it up by lying and the investigators got the truth out of him.

@Fox What are you on about? We do know what happened when he pulled out his gun. We saw the video. The victim AND another were turning away from him, not taking a step toward him when he fired his gun.

@William Graham you don't know what was he thinking at the moment. You don't know what was going on in his head afterwards. You don't know with what intent he approached the car. You don't know he "planned to use a gun". I don't know what a saint are you if you won't use a gun even when you're being beaten. What's the point of having one then? Also, I never said that he was calm during the confrontation. I said that people who know him said he was generally a calm person. I don't know who started screaming and won't pretend that I know everything like you do. And as I said, you don't know what situation he pulled the gun out in. Ant the last part is just exactly my point: you accuse him of being a psycho-murderer with pure evil flowing through his veins just because the court said he did it intentionally. Same court released a person who murdered her own child, would you defend her then? I'm so tired of this argument.

@William Graham I'm basing this on a fact that this has been said in the video. You don't know what happened when he pulled out his gun.

@William Graham I'm basing this on a fact that this has been said in the video. You don't know what happened when he pulled out his gun.

@Fox I find your defence of this murderer very strange.

This murderer lied and tried to claim that the victim took a step towards him and so he fired his gun in fear for his life. The video evidence proves otherwise.

The clown then sat and blabbered to the investigators who he thought were his friends and would side with his brand of justice. They were able to get a true account of what happened out of his own clown mouth.

He deliberately approached that car knowing it might end in a confrontation. He didn't care because he had a gun on him, which he planned to use to solve any confrontation that might crop up. That's what gave him confidence as it had in the past.

In fact he didn't pull the trigger because he feared for his life, but because he feared a beating. He feared that he was going to be kicked and beaten, so he pulled out his gun and killed another human being.

And despite your repeated claims that he was calm during the initial confrontation, there was enough of an argument that people in the store heard and the woman's husband came out. Also a calm person would not have a history of pulling a gun on different people on multiple occasions.

A calm person would not have shot and murdered another person in this situation.

And finally the court judged him to be a murderer. End of story. Case closed

@Zach Johnson Racism? Where? I'm white. Does calling out this trash of a human being for killing another make me a racist against my own kind?

@Zach Johnson Racism? Where? I'm white. Does calling out this trash of a human being for killing another make me a racist against my own kind?

@Timberland People carry guns for all sorts of reasons. The predominant one being for protection. Some I believe carry guns because they relish the idea of having power or intimidating anyone who gets in their way or doesn't immediately do as they please.

@Fox You keep harping on this crazy lunatic being a calm person. What are you basing this on? The guy has a history of pulling guns on people, even women, but yet here you are claiming insistently that he's a calm level headed person who's just misunderstood?

@Mental Popcorn tf are you tryna say? Simplify your argument because it sounds to me you're just reiterating stuff I already talked about.

@Mental Popcorn tf are you tryna say? Simplify your argument because it sounds to me you're just reiterating stuff I already talked about.

@William Graham sticks and stones... but still that guy didn't continue being physically aggressive, so he was not in imminent danger. At that point if he would have called the cops he would have been in the right. Most likely would have even gotten compensation, if he sued the man.

@Frogstarr Logic what? You would have been hired if you had it at such level.

@Frogstarr Logic what? You would have been hired if you had it at such level.

@Zach Johnson Telling someone not to park on a handicap place is being a shit person? He wanted to kill someone so much that he initiated an argument just to justify himself after, even though he was characterized as a calm person? I don't even want to continue this discussion.

@Frogstarr How come you don't work as a police officer yet if you can figure out what was everyone saying from a low quality video without sound showing only one person's back?

@Frogstarr How come you don't work as a police officer yet if you can figure out what was everyone saying from a low quality video without sound showing only one person's back?

@Violet Wade Exactly what I'm talking about. You don't take anything into the consideration. You see that someone shot someone and are fully convinced that he's a criminal or even a psycho, and the fact that he wasn't the one to start this is non-existent.

@Violet Wade how can you state blatantly false information to make ones case look better? Saying the guy only took a step towards the shooter is just false. He violently pushed him down. They're not saying shooting him was the right call. They're just saying your argument is dogshit, and it is.

@Fox they both did wrong, but one did significantly more wrong than the other. What next? Are you going to say jay walkers are just as bad as drunk drivers? Do you have no sense of scale?

@Fox they both did wrong, but one did significantly more wrong than the other. What next? Are you going to say jay walkers are just as bad as drunk drivers? Do you have no sense of scale?

@Fox the hate you see is racism my friend. It is blatantly pushed and rewarded. I'm not talking the shit they claim is the problem either....

@Fox the hate you see is racism my friend. It is blatantly pushed and rewarded. I'm not talking the shit they claim is the problem either....

@William Graham to say someone has to right to approach someones car is asinine and stupid. Solely because of that i think your argument is crap. Dude shouldnt be harassing people over handicap placards and he was a shit pile...but sneaking up on someone and shoving them to the ground like that would put some fear in you...he shouldn't have shot. If he was really in fear flashing it could've been enough but you are right...he wanted to kill him.

Thing is these things do nothing but divide and make everyone hate each other. There is no way forward because that hatred is important to some.

@Timberland Protection. Drejka did not need that kind of protection. He was overreacting and should have weighed his options. Dumb move.

@Timberland Protection. Drejka did not need that kind of protection. He was overreacting and should have weighed his options. Dumb move.

@Fox Um no. The white guy was swearing his head off. You can see that from his head rocking back and forth.

@Fox Um no. The white guy was swearing his head off. You can see that from his head rocking back and forth.

@Violet Wade ''the fact that he shot a man shows that he's 1) Not fit to carry a weapon'' so you carry guns for..?

@Violet Wade ''the fact that he shot a man shows that he's 1) Not fit to carry a weapon'' so you carry guns for..?

@Fox See that's where you lost everyone. You dont shoot someone because they made you mad. Period. The fact that he shot a man shows that he's 1) Not fit to carry a weapon, 2) Not good at deescalating a situation, 3) YES overreacting. If he really thought the dude was going to kill him, then he was blowing the whole thing outta proportion. He had SO MANY OTHER OPTIONS to avoid further commotion. But he chose to pull out a gun and kill him. That makes you a murderer if you cant find any other way out of a pretty innocuous situation but to shoot and kill. This should be simpler than youre making it. Maybe u just want to justify the shooting cuz youre scared it'll become a racial thing? Whatever it is, stop over thinking it. The shooter belongs in an institution.

@William Graham Maybe stop pretending that there is only black and white and acknowledge that both did wrong?

@William Graham Maybe stop pretending that there is only black and white and acknowledge that both did wrong?

@Violet Wade He threw him on the ground. Maybe he was overreacting, but everyone in the comments says that he's that pure evil who just wants to kill people, or that he's weak and wants to pour his anger on even weaker ones, and I think that's not the case. I don't see that amount of hate on videos of real murderers.

@cj Hall Be that as it may, what is wrong with it is knowing the encounter could end up in an aggressive confrontation and you being ok with that because you know you're packing. He confronted the driver with the knowledge that if things didn't go the way he wanted he could simply pull out his gun and shut them up. As he had done four times previously. It's clear it was only a matter of time before he killed someone.

And you have no right to confront anyone about parking in a handicap section unless you're in law enforcement.

@Fox You dont need to write all that. Just think to yourself for a moment: Should I kill a guy because he took a step towards me? Did i really think he was about to kill me or was I just overreacting? I think overreacting. Case closed.

@William Graham You don't know what he was thinking when he pulled the gun out on this dude. You don't know what happened when he pulled his gun out before. He had full rights to approach someone's car, he didn't come that close nor did he touch it. He went there to tell her to park her car on the other spot, we still don't know who started the confrontation first. Even if he was aggressive, he didn't use any force first. All the people close to him say he was always calm and no one even knew he had a gun in the first place. I don't know what you see, but I surely don't see a psycho who wants to kill someone. Just a basic man who has a gun for self defense.

@Fox Dude, did you watch the video? Fact: <br>He lied about his interactions with the victim. Fact: He has a history of pulling his gun on people. Four people to be exact including women. Fact: He walked around the car and rightfully the woman rolled down her window to ask him what he was doing. He approached her car when he had no right to do so. He went there with a confrontation in mind. That in itself is aggressive. Are we supposed to believe that a man who goes around pulling his gun on people was not aggressive 🙄

@Fox Dude, did you watch the video? Fact:
He lied about his interactions with the victim. Fact: He has a history of pulling his gun on people. Four people to be exact including women. Fact: He walked around the car and rightfully the woman rolled down her window to ask him what he was doing. He approached her car when he had no right to do so. He went there with a confrontation in mind. That in itself is aggressive. Are we supposed to believe that a man who goes around pulling his gun on people was not aggressive 🙄

@William Graham has it been said that it was him who started being aggressive or you're just making this up? All I've heard that there were 2 people arguing. And anyway, he didn't touch her once, but her man comes out and starts being a macho by pushing him on the ground. Not that simple.

@Fox Right. Like you wouldn't confront a man being aggressive with your woman. The shooter was being aggressive first with the victim's woman, so much so that people in the store could hear the altercation.

He did wrong by shooting him and especially shooting him in the body, but the other dude started being aggressive first. One thing is having a verbal argument, and the other one  is using force.

@CyberWolf
Canis  Lupus
Howl baby..🌙  Long and Loud...

@CyberWolf
Canis  Lupus
Howl baby..🌙  Long and Loud...

@Diamond Cooper I agree with active self protection.  but in fairness he initiated the entire thing. if I go around starting shit with people and kill them as the become aggressive is that ok?

it's almost like the police actually do their job...

it's almost like the police actually do their job...

I think he did wrong to protect himself.  He should have asked for a lawyer first.

I think he did wrong to protect himself.  He should have asked for a lawyer first.

Lol probably thought his ass was going to get a job that day too 💀

Lol probably thought his ass was going to get a job that day too 💀


“Neutralize the immediate threat.” Dude is living in an action movie and he’s the main character.


crazy how his arm worked perfectly fine when he was alone, but as soon as the cops walk in it’s “owiee my poor arm i can’t even lift it 🥺🥺 shake my left hand instead 🥺🥺” absolutely pathetic


Conclusion: On December 14, 2018, Judge Joseph Bulone set the trial of Michael Drejka to begin on August 19, 2019. Drejka was no longer using a "Stand Your Ground" defense. On August 23, Drejka was found guilty of manslaughter with the use of a firearm. On October 10, 2019, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit of 92 days for time served (he had faced up to 30 years in prison). McGlockton's family asked for the maximum, while the defense asked for house arrest and probation. The judge spared Drejka from the maximum sentence due to his cooperation with the police and his lack of prior convictions, but said that he was a wannabe cop and tough guy who tried to self-appoint himself as a handicapped parking space monitor.

He is imprisoned at Lancaster Correctional Institution, near Trenton, Florida, where he was attacked and reportedly wounded by another inmate on February 11, 2020. In December 2021, a three-judge panel of the Florida Second District Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and the sentencing.

@Squiggly Line still it doesn't justify being killed by police wannabe person

Somehow I found pleasure in hearing that.

@Johnny NatriumAfter noticing your many condescending statements in this feed. Ive seen how you respond to others.-- You see in others what you cannot admit is in yourself.( Hint, nobody cares that much to attack you in any way.)

In Florida he will pull what 85% of that..the dude didn't seem together his actions at all.

@Johnny Natrium You gaslight people. Ok that's it for me. Bye

@Looking 4 Things Who said it makes sense to me? If I may humbly offer some advice: stop stressing yourself out by filling in other people's thoughts and views with negativity, based on some preconditioned assumption that people who say one person was in the wrong, automatically think the other person was right in doing what they did. This shapes such a common misguided worldview where people are reduced to one-dimensional evil or good, based on simplistic and generalizing interpretations of opinions.

@Johnny Natrium What a price to pay for an oversight. Just doesn't make sense to me as a mother myself.

@Johnny Natrium The parking space was not a legal handicapped space with the proper signage approved by the town. As the deputy on the scene explained. Drejka was illegally parked.

Sweet justice. I don't feel bad about it at all.

@berry pretty macular degeneration in his leg?

@Jon Norwood thats not what they’re saying…

Why did I read this with JCS narrator's voice?

@Squiggly Line i am telling you this as a full time wheelchair user, it doesn't fucking matter. Her boyfriend was slaughtered in front of her over a miniscule misstep. She has no blame here, this man would have killed anyone who became slightly aggressive with his self-appointed entitlement to authority. Mistakes do not mean someone should die.

@Metal Gamer that's pretty weird that you think handicapped spaces should be given to non-handicapped people when there are other spaces available. that's almost like the exact opposite of how that should work

So now people should be mindful of not parking in certain spots so they don't get shot based on most arguments I've read that's the assessment I've come to make.

@Melissa Coulter How about you read my comment again; the answer to your question is right there. Do I really have to remind you that you completely made up your entire accusation upon which you base your gripe with me? Look at your first sentence, which is a question based upon sheer fantastical speculation about what I might be thinking, and then look at my comment to see that you never needed to ask that question.

@Johnny Natrium are you really suggesting that it was her fault her husband was shot and killed in front of their young children no less, because she parked in a disabled spot which was the furthest from the door and every single spot in front of the door was actually available. We don’t even get to see the actual spot!! It could be one that has no post and barely visible paint on the ground! I happen to live 20 mins from where this happened and I can tell you 100% that we have MANY spots where it’s not immediately obvious if your not specifically looking! But yea your probably right… it’s all her fault.

@Zach Vinson <---- this guy parks in handicap spots

@Zach Vinson We are VERY grateful for those spots, and we SAY SO too. I guess you're a teenager and yet to develop to the adult stage, why else would you make such an inane comment!?  Hmm, he shot an unarmed man, perhaps that's why he was convicted of manslaughter. Just a guess, of course.

@Zach Vinson

"...a 10 second stop at a rundown gas station isn’t the same."
Yes, it is. It is exactly the same.

@Red Diver I’m not referring to places like grocery stores or something. When you’re referring to something a little bigger, I totally get it. Biggest douche move in the world. I totally agree. There was a video I seen of a guy who couldn’t get his wheelchair ramp out because a lady parked in the middle of the lines on a spot. So I totally see what you mean. But because someone parked in one at a rundown gas station that was “his store” he felt he needed to do something about it. Which got someone killed. That’s what I meant when I’m referring to the handicap spot. If it’s Walmart or something, I totally get it. But a 10 second stop at a rundown gas station isn’t the same. I feel like context matters in these situations.

@Squiggly Line u care about the law but u defend murderers over parking citations lol

@Zach Vinson
Yes. Too often I have seen truly handicapped people struggle when a non-stickered car parks in a handicapped stall. That man was wrong and deserves to be punished for what he did.
But people who wrongly park in handicapped stalls are scum.

@Zach Vinson This may be the most insanely nonsensical comment I've ever read.

@Johnny Natrium have you honestly ever seen a handicap person get out of a car and go “gosh I’m sure glad that this handicap parking spot was open, if it wasn’t, who knows where I’d be”. There’s a reason he was convicted of manslaughter.

@Metal Gamer Yet she fails to consider the plentiful parking spaces for herself to park instead of taking up the handicapped space..

@Metal Gamer Yes yes, I'm sure she's given careful consideration to all handicapped before parking in their spaces, weighing each scenario carefully before finalizing the park...........

@Squiggly Line Only when there are plenty of other available parking spaces to minimize the impact of her actions, from what I've heard.

Thanks! What about the lady? Does she still park in handicapped spaces?


You'd almost think he caught his wife cheating on him in a car parked in a handicapped spot, or saw his father get killed by somebody who was parked in one with how OBSESSED his is with those handicapped spots and the inappropriate amount of rage he has for people who park in one without the placard. Chill dude. That's not exactly the most pressing issue in our society today.

Your right in this case, many parking spots next to it available.<br>If it was a full parking lot I could understand his pount of view to check.. (I have also the habbit to check for the card when I walk by a car parked in a handicap spot. And when I see non and someone sitting in the car they also get my dirty look pointed at them.. even I'm not a handicapted man)

Your right in this case, many parking spots next to it available.
If it was a full parking lot I could understand his pount of view to check.. (I have also the habbit to check for the card when I walk by a car parked in a handicap spot. And when I see non and someone sitting in the car they also get my dirty look pointed at them.. even I'm not a handicapted man)