I would love to see a video of the most not guilty appearing suspect in an interrogation that was ultimately guilty


At 29:32 the police officer asks this murderer, "What were his (the victim's) hands doing?" And "Were you able to see them, were you able to see the guy's hands?" The lying murderer responds, "I have no clue." While simultaneously repeating the exact hand gesture that his victim demonstrated before he gunned him down in cold blooded first degree MUR-ER-DER .

And at 39:30, just after the murderer cries about missing his dogs (not about him being the only reason his victim's children will NEVER see their father again) the interviewer asks this murderer if there was anything that he would change. And the cold blooded murderer actually said no!!!!!!

At 29:32 the police officer asks this murderer, "What were his (the victim's) hands doing?" And "Were you able to see them, were you able to see the guy's hands?" The lying murderer responds, "I have no clue." While simultaneously repeating the exact hand gesture that his victim demonstrated before he gunned him down in cold blooded first degree *MUR-ER-DER* .

And at 39:30, just after the murderer cries about missing his dogs (not about him being the only reason his victim's children will *NEVER* see their father again) the interviewer asks this murderer if there was anything that he would change. And the cold blooded murderer actually said no!!!!!!

@Santa Claus Im not the one being nit picky about how to spell murderer. What shall I get over Santa? lol

@Looking 4 Things I think it was called a joke, they spelled murderer wrong. Ryan jokingly asked what a Murerder is. Get over yourself will you? Thanks.

@ryan izak maree Do you really need someone to spell it out for you?


You got to respect the officer he was leading him to at least say “he was in fear for his life” and it never crossed this idiots mind! He was looking for trouble and trouble he found! Blessings for the family that’s suffering 🙏and the victimMarquise 😇 All because some loser wanted to play cowboi🤠💥💥..Truly sad, the whole situation, thank god Mr Drejka 🗣 talked himself into jail that’s the best part 😂😂of the whole unfortunate day…


As a european, I just started to grasp the full effect of american gun laws after binge watching JCS vids. I could not walk the streets peacefully, when every idiot could possibly carry a gun on him.

As a Canadian, it's honestly insane to me.


These cases are invaluable to concealed weapons carriers.  Some people like to talk tough about how they handle themselves in rough neighborhoods, but everyone needs to know the weapon in the last resort, not the initial response.


Hint: Never talk to the police, even if you’re innocent. Always lawyer up immediately!

@Walden dont do that, dont say anything without a lawyer present. If they offer water say nothing and dont drink it. If they ask how the weather is say nothing. Say nothing. Say absolutely nothing except "I want a/my lawyer."

You can talk to the police and just answer every question with "I'm not sure."  There was one murder case where this wife of a killer does was say "I'm not sure."  And the detectives would get frustrated and say "It's a yes or no question"  And she replies with "I'm not sure."   LOL  The detectives were trying to figure out if she help her husband cover his crime so they can charge her.  But because all she says is "I'm not sure."  they can't pin her on anything. LOL   She did this without any lawyer.


Just seeing him wait over 5 seconds after pulling his gun to shoot shows he wasn’t in fear of his life. He thinks he’s a vigilante but In reality he’s a villain


This man had many other options then to shoot. Pulling out that gun was not where he was in the wrong, it was firing the gun at the man that was the problem. He should have pulled it out and warned the man that if he got any closer he would fire or he should fire a warning shot (he should have a blank on the first round that way no one else gets severely hurt if he messes up the warning shot) He had so many other options and I think especially if he stated that he didn't even fear for his life he should have not shot that man.


This guy was looking for trouble the minute he pulled in the lot. Circling the woman’s car looking for a handicap sticker so that he could start some shit. And look what It got you buddy!! You have/had NO right to take a life over a scraped elbow!


It's really interesting to see him complain about his arms, when they leave - he isn't really showing any signs of discomfort or soreness but soon as an officer comes back in, "left hand, left hand" and acts like he is in complete discomfort, again.


To de-escalate a problem that can get physical he could’ve apologize (regardless of what they were doing,he was in no business to enforce a parking issue)  mind his own business and go upon the rest of his day. But his idea of de-escalating a problem he created is to k1ll the man?? That was someone’s child,that was someone parent (who also witnessed it all)..the complete disregard of life is insane,all over a parking spot.Yeah I see people that use those spots to wait on someone,or hop out looking completely capable but it ain’t my business..people have disabilities that aren’t visible and they can very well have an issue I do not see so I do not bother them and keep to myself. This guy thought he could use the stand your ground law as excuse to start crap with people and not receive the consequences.


That sheriff gave Drejka the shovel and Drejka dug a grave so goddamn deep. The epitaph would read, "He never said a word."

The sheriff handled this beautifully. He set up Drejka time and time again to essentially confess to murdering someone aaaaaand Drejka was none the wiser.


His reaction when told the victim was dead speaks for itself. zero remorse.

What I am trying to show is had he shown remorse it would have been detrimental to his argument.

Well, it followed the line that what he said.. he did what he had to do. So it was on the the deceased's his own death (according to his point of view)


Hes a bully. He lacks control and authority so instead he takes it out on strangers.

He saw a woman alone with kids in the parking lot. She was the perfect victim to bully. So that's what he did.

@G. Marie You seem to care though. Otherwise you wouldn't have responded...

@StoutJudas then why are you sitting here acting like you are? because absolutely nobody cares that you think its «extremely annoying» that people who arent handicapped parks in the handicap spot, because it really had nothing to do with this

@G. Marie I don't justify it. He belongs in prison.

@StoutJudas nobody cares if you find them extremely annoying. i just hope you realise that you’re infact sitting here trying to justify this man shooting a father.

@Eva-Imogene Wharehoka Friend Eva. I didn't call it a "Crime of the century" nor was it justified gunning down the guy with the anger issues. I just find those people extremely annoying.

@StoutJudas guess what?   families with young kids do this stuff sometimes. it's not bullying. it's called.. tired..    taking a short cut.. .  not right .. but hardly crime of the century

Well they guy is a weirdo but they did park on a handicap spot.

"Hes a bully. He lacks control and authority" <br>Are you describing people who push others to the ground because they can't control their temper?

"Hes a bully. He lacks control and authority"
Are you describing people who push others to the ground because they can't control their temper?


On October 10, 2019, Drejka was sentenced to 20 years in prison with credit of 92 days for time served


In the interview at end of video the shooter is to dimwitted to realize he is being setup when interviewer ask him if there was anything about that day he could change what would it be? He's focusing on the specific mechanics of the incident from the point of view you can't change what has already happened rather than if you had the whole incident to do over. It is stated that he had 4 previous altercations with strangers in the past 18 months and did not have the capacity, such as fist fighting, to defend himself. It does lead one to believe when he holsters that Glock 40 he also holsters an attitude with it. None of this negates the fact that a younger, stronger and physically bigger individual initiated a physical confrontation violently shoving him to the ground.  His biggest mistake was not (1.) requesting to go to the hospital to document injury to arm, (2.) not speaking to police until he obtained an attorney and(3.) waiting 72 hours, as police all across the country do after a police involved shooting, before speaking with the police.<br>When you are in a police interrogation room the police are not your friends no matter. How friendly they may seem.

In the interview at end of video the shooter is to dimwitted to realize he is being setup when interviewer ask him if there was anything about that day he could change what would it be? He's focusing on the specific mechanics of the incident from the point of view you can't change what has already happened rather than if you had the whole incident to do over. It is stated that he had 4 previous altercations with strangers in the past 18 months and did not have the capacity, such as fist fighting, to defend himself. It does lead one to believe when he holsters that Glock 40 he also holsters an attitude with it. None of this negates the fact that a younger, stronger and physically bigger individual initiated a physical confrontation violently shoving him to the ground.  His biggest mistake was not (1.) requesting to go to the hospital to document injury to arm, (2.) not speaking to police until he obtained an attorney and(3.) waiting 72 hours, as police all across the country do after a police involved shooting, before speaking with the police.
When you are in a police interrogation room the police are not your friends no matter. How friendly they may seem.


the amount of "negative" he said in the whole conversation is enough to ionize the air and purify the whole room.


Lesson to be learned here: don’t put hands on someone (you might get shot) and don’t shoot someone because of a confrontation/assault unless you’re in imminent danger.


This must be the quintessential video interview for the saying "Get a lawyer and don't talk to the cops".


Less than two minutes into this, Drejka is a killer, pure and simple.


People can make all the JCS inspired videos they want, and I like a lot of them, but nothing compares to the real deal JCS.


Best channel out there. Pure awesomeness content


What kind of psychological test do you have to go thru to get a permit to carry a gun in the US?<br>Seems like none by the look of the interview of this video.

What kind of psychological test do you have to go thru to get a permit to carry a gun in the US?
Seems like none by the look of the interview of this video.


20 years in prison for stealing someones life away isnt fair at all


The scary thing is that Michael seemed to be sure he will get away with that. Hell, he might even truly believed that. The second scary thing is, that, without a CCTV, he possibly would have been right with that assumption.

He didn't think he would get away with anything, because he doesn't think he committed a crime.

not really, the girlfriend was a direct witness and there were many other witnesses at the scene

The cops tried to let him get away with it. The local sheriff declared he couldn't be jailed because of stand-your-ground laws in a public press conference. It's only when the district attorney decided to charge the man with manslaughter that he got taken off the streets.

@Meep Meep yep. One of those lunatics who fantasize about being in a situation where they can use justifiable homicide as a defense. George Zimmerman Jr.

Do you blame him for thinking he’d get away with it? The police murder unarmed black men with impunity all the time. He probably thought they’d deputize him on the spot.

@Hanna Lester You haven't been around men, have you, especially some who are into guns.  It's a different relationship with death.

The 3rd scary thing is how indifferent he acts when given the news that he's just uhhh idk TAKEN SOMEONES LIFE!! I'd hope that any sane person (as I would be personally) would be beside themselves learning this if they truly were simply trying to defend themselves...but that was never Michael's intention, all along he simply wanted to hurt, kill and get revenge. Sick!

@Maxso hey nice bait! do you fish a lot? lol

@Amber D. kinda grateful my country doesn't allowed to have a gun

@Meep Meep that's what I thought immediately after seeing him purposely pick a fight over a parking spot. he probably thought he could cry self defense when he shot and killed the guy when he provoked him into pushing or hitting him. what a despicable human being this guy is...

You get the impression this guy carries his gun around waiting for a chance to kill someone.

i noticed that he believed he was gonna be let free too, made me wonder why he was so confident!


I think my favorite and only think I like about cops is that they pretend to care about people personal life “ awww that’s dope” 😂😂


Happened right down the street from me. Been to Circle A dozens of times.


No reason to go over board .this guy is deluded .so he feels his actions are normal to do . This is why everyone shouldn't have access to fire arms


That's what happens when u allow every clown that wants a gun to own and carry one in public


They were both in the wrong, the shot guy started the physical damage, and the shooter took it too long, it could have stayed as a verbal fight.

No, it couldnt have stayed a verbal fight, because drejka wouldve 10% pulled his gun no MATTER what marquice did or said, he was literally KNOWN for doing that.


once he pulled the gun, and had the target zero'd in...there was no reason to pull the trigger.  you HAVE TO respect the power you possess in your hands.  you have the situation completely deescalated...BACK AWAY AND CALL 911 UNLESS THERE IS ANOTHER GUN BEING DRAWN!!!!!!!!!!


I've yet to see one of these where the forensic lady ISNT a smoke show...


This broke  a part of my heart that will Never UnBreak .


Lol the clown is taking notes in his trial like he is at a university lecture. Hahah


why did the detective ask if his arm was broken when he was brought in? was that just a “wanna seem friendly” or was he just genuinely nice or is there a legal reason they have to check his health?

It's  probly to see if it's justified,a bit atleast.


He say's "He hit me from behind." despite being shoved from the front.


Just imagine that guys like this are given a badge and a gun everyday.


20 years for: cold-blooded killing of an unarmed young father defending his family who had started backing away once this guy pulled a gun on him was an insult and unjustifiable. This guy then overplayed his right hand injury, lied that Markeis McGlockton was advancing towards him and that was why he shot him. The video clearly showed Markeis backing away.
I don't care about any idiot who might question my personal opinion, but I've wondered so many times about what the outcome would've been had the roles been reversed and it was Markeis who had shot and killed this man in the same manner. I bet the sentence would've been much heavier, and the treatment by the cops would've been so much different from the car park, through these interviews to the Court as we have seen them treat this guy.
Incidentally, when this self-appointed car park attendant approached Britani Jacobs's car, he himself was parked illegally.

Easily could have been charged with 1st degree and given life without parole.


I think he was embarrassed and angry at being pushed so he shot him, not justifiable at all.


This guy is the result you get when sit on a computer all day and think you “operate”. Jesus he’s cringe


Amazing interview by the sheriff. I was not expecting much to be honest.


He didn't have to shoot him. He could've threatened him with the gun until he left him alone, or he could have shot him in the foot to keep him away. He deserve 20 years in prison this was not out of self defense this is murder!

foot has veins... bad idea<br>aiming with a gun isn't easy on such a small target which would make him shoot the leg.. a problem even worse than the first one

foot has veins... bad idea
aiming with a gun isn't easy on such a small target which would make him shoot the leg.. a problem even worse than the first one


Man these cops actually gave this guy many chances to help his own case….he’s not very bright


"I carry a gun so I might as well just go out and start arguments with everybody"<br>- This guy probably

"I carry a gun so I might as well just go out and start arguments with everybody"
- This guy probably


4:10 that handshake went as smoothly as the confrontation Michael was in.


Totally avoidable situation by all 3 involved


Emboldened by the Zimmerman verdict.
He ran into trouble when “his store” had his derrière on camera.Otherwise he walks in Florida, regardless of his truly self damning statements.
Never forget Trayvon.

Trayvon got what was coming to him after beating a man. Watch zimmermans trial. This is not the same situation at all.


With a defence and defence lawyer that bad he should have just pleaded guilty


in the first 4 minutes, "just scraped up." so mild bruises and scrapes make it alright to kill a man? bro really dug his own grave💀


"Shoot just the once, no reason to go overboard" yeah right, you really took a step back and recollected yourself SMH and then they say have a tendency to get hysterical!


What a pansy! (not the p word i wanted to use) He strikes me as the kind of person that's been itching for ANY reason to use the gun on someone.


Wow they really took 20 mins to get to someone with a gunshot wound?!


We should teach gun safety and legal use in schools


If you can sit there on the ground for a couple seconds, slowly pull up your shirt to grab your gun, and then point the gun for 2 seconds before finally firing while the “threat” stands three feet away from you backing up. It’s pretty safe to assume they’re not an immediate threat anymore and were clearly just pissed off you were screaming at their wife. After the push, I can honestly bet nothing worse was going to happen had the man not pulled out his gun instantly.


I think Drejka's lawyer knew that Drejka was probably gonna be convicted.

And Im saying that because his whole defense was "dont believe the video because its standard definition" and "Drejka is the real victim lol trust me"

LOL yup.   Imagine the lawyer saying "You can't convict someone on 720p quality, it's has to be above 1080p HD."


This Guy F….d up his Life for a Parking Spot.


25:26 In a way, they're giving him plenty of opportunities to try and lie about what they could have said

25:26 *In a way, they're giving him plenty of opportunities* to try and lie about what they could have said


Though, I think his tears when his dogs are brought up, are actually of compassion, he is a racist. You don't need to express "green eggs and ham" if your comfortable when it comes to black people. You just say "you're not racist", period!


why does this guy remind me of my "step dad" ofc I wouldn't imagine this happening but yeah


Just watched video may change depending on audio but i say guilty he shot after the man was away you should war first there was no direct threat


50:19 "But could he have killed him?!"

Death Stare You're damn right I could have."

50:19 "But could he have killed him?!"

*Death Stare* You're damn right I could have."


now imagine the scenario if gun wasn't so easily accessible to the general population.........they would both survive maybe with bruises and maybe broken ribs if they got into a big fight............but they would be alive.


He is the type of guy to direct foot traffic at a grocery store bc he open carries.


I have a disabled parking placard. When you get one, you get a paper with helpful info. It states that your physical status is between you and the police. You are only obligated to produce the placard when a police officer asks for it. Because of all that, it really pisses me off when people try to police the disabled parking spaces. If you must cause a problem for someone parked in a disabled space, call the police. Let them deal with it.

@FolkPunk MusicJunkie also, what if it was an off-duty cop? he would have gotten off

@FolkPunk MusicJunkie you ever spoken to a cop who is having a bad day/is just in a shitty mood? you have too much faith in police

it's against the law to ask WHY someone is disabled, if you have the legally required materials, they are required by law to leave you alone... learn your rights

Find Me there’s absolutely no reason to think he would’ve attacked a cop. This guy was arguing with the man’s wife, he was concerned for his wife and family’s safety. It would’ve been a very different scene if he emerged from the store to see his wife calmly talking to a cop,

The man would've attacked the police and the same thing would of happened. In both scenarios it was a justified shooting.


Ok, very european statement: this is why i feel americas laws about guns are FUCKED UP!


Something tells me that if he had no gun, he would have never confronted anyone. He's a little Bish.


He forgot his arm was injured pretty quickly.


I wonder why was he arrested 25 days after instead of on the spot after interrogation? I mean the cctv footage was so clear.


This lawyer for Drejka is DAF!   Nobody in their right mind would celebrate something like that, especially during a MURDER interview!  Drekja is guilty AF!   Bury him under the prison


He did not shoot him in self defense, he shot him because he was mad he got shoved and fell over.  This was murder.

He did not shoot him in self defense, he shot him because he was mad he got shoved and fell over.  This was murder.

@JIM wow wow careful there badass, you might be too cool for this comment section to handle

@JIM wow wow careful there badass, you might be too cool for this comment section to handle

@Annie Lin yeah, im not gonna "type like an adult" to someone trying to justify an unwarranted shooting

@Annie Lin yeah, im not gonna "type like an adult" to someone trying to justify an unwarranted shooting

@valko ki Well how about writing like a adult instead of insulting someone you don't know, huh? I'll ignore everything else what is coming from you  from now on have a nice day.

@valko ki Well how about writing like a adult instead of insulting someone you don't know, huh? I'll ignore everything else what is coming from you  from now on have a nice day.

@R B that's only first degree, 2nd degree doesn't require premeditated but this was still not 2nd or even 3rd degree murder. Manslaughter fits it perfectly.

@R B that's only first degree, 2nd degree doesn't require premeditated but this was still not 2nd or even 3rd degree murder. Manslaughter fits it perfectly.

@Mr abd The guy who was shot never said anything and just run towards the other one without him seeing the guy cuz he was out of his sight. Imagine someone does that to you what would you think while you are falling to the ground? Well he thought he get punched or something or worse. I don't think to shot someone is a good thing but it was his instinct at that point. He shot him one time, not several time otherwise he would've thought he wants to kill the other guy with several shots.

@Skip the Chip he was retreating and not charging the guy he didn't need to shoot

@Skip the Chip he was retreating and not charging the guy he didn't need to shoot

@Dax Ratbone Calling Whites for everything they do "racist" makes you racist. Sorry but whenever a white person does something, it is directly racist, but the fact that whites are immediately referred to as such is also racist towards whites.  Skin color shouldn't matter, we are all human.

@valko ki You need to understand what an escalation is. When people are yelling, adrenaline is pumping. When you get knocked over, you are in a vulnerability situation. The victim wanted to de-escalate the situation and did so by asserting his power over the situation and knocked the guy with a gun down. Backing away doesn't matter. He escalated the situation. Doesn't means he "deserved" to die. No one "deserves" anything. The point is if you want to de-escalate a situation, don't escalate it.

@Taco King what is wrong with you, he killed someone because he was pushed not punched not shot not stabed pushed and markeis was clearly backing of once the gun was drawn yet drejka still shot.

@Taco King what is wrong with you, he killed someone because he was pushed not punched not shot not stabed pushed and markeis was clearly backing of once the gun was drawn yet drejka still shot.

@Puchowska I'm allowed to use examples to prove a point. He may have felt his life was in danger, but that doesn't give him a free pass to kill someone. It's obvious on the video that his life wasn't actually in danger, that's why he was sentenced and in jail for killing somebody. He wasn't in the right.

@Taco King If he was defending himself, he would have pulled out the gun, seen the guy backing away, and then not shot and called 911. Do you think an unarmed guy would decide to tackle a guy pointing a gun at him point blank. This isn’t a “court wants to blame white people” issue.

@Taco King If he was defending himself, he would have pulled out the gun, seen the guy backing away, and then not shot and called 911. Do you think an unarmed guy would decide to tackle a guy pointing a gun at him point blank. This isn’t a “court wants to blame white people” issue.

He shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.

Agreed. If the ethnicity was switched. Would there be all this questioning and reasoning.

Agreed. If the ethnicity was switched. Would there be all this questioning and reasoning.

Honestly.. its clear that everyone underneath this thread has certain opinions about what is deemed “a threat” and not. And although, I have my own it’s quite frustrating to see that.. why don’t we all just mind our own damn business so this does not have to happen anyways. Like everyone’s really arguing over the fact someone tried to do a good deed but in reality the kind of world we live in. Maybe there’s a different way you can go about positivity, but that’s just me. Mind our own business and live. Never had to be this complicated

@Grilled Leeks The justice system obviously didn't work here. I was against him at the start, then on the fence, then completely on his side towards the end. He did nothing wrong like wtf was the Jury thinking? and THIRTY YEARS? For a 2 second mistake? Its not like he kept shooting. He only shot once. This is just so stupid to me. Why does it matter he started to move away? He just SHOVED HIM, without ANY reason. "Protecting family" my ass. He was just talking to them.

No, he was assaulted and outnumbered by people who were clearly violent and possibly armed. The illegal handicapped parking attacker did not even try to engage in conversation

No, he was assaulted and outnumbered by people who were clearly violent and possibly armed. The illegal handicapped parking attacker did not even try to engage in conversation

@FlymanMS I literally said that Markheis shouldn’t have shoved him to begin with... I just don’t think a push warrants a manslaughter.

@FlymanMS I literally said that Markheis shouldn’t have shoved him to begin with... I just don’t think a push warrants a manslaughter.

@Intimacy Stop your non sense, this dude committed murder. First of all, he should not be acting like he is a law enforcement officer out enforcing the law and then get into a verbal argument with that woman. Second, the victim should not have pushed him but the victim did not follow up with kicks or punches. As a matter a fact once this murderer pulled out his weapon the victim actually backs away, it's on video in case you didn't see.  He should of called the cops but this turd was already predisposed to this type of behavior.

@𝑆𝑎𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠 so I guess you defend an unprovoked physical assault?

@𝑆𝑎𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠 so I guess you defend an unprovoked physical assault?

@Jack Burton He put himself in that situation thinking he was a cop out enforcing the law. After he was shoved there was no follow up assault, he decided to commit murder out of anger.  I think he felt brave because he had a gun and felt entitled to take it upon himself to enforce the law.

@Jack Burton He put himself in that situation thinking he was a cop out enforcing the law. After he was shoved there was no follow up assault, he decided to commit murder out of anger.  I think he felt brave because he had a gun and felt entitled to take it upon himself to enforce the law.

@Grilled Leeks now you're trying to wiggle your way out with wordism, "I didn't say that exact thing so I'm still correct", pretty weak

@Grilled Leeks now you're trying to wiggle your way out with wordism, "I didn't say that exact thing so I'm still correct", pretty weak

@Grilled Leeks lol "justice system" isn't some god or higher being, it's people who make decision and people are not always right.

@Grilled Leeks lol "justice system" isn't some god or higher being, it's people who make decision and people are not always right.

@Grilled Leeks so you're saying shoving someone over for being loud and annoying is ok? Where have you been growing up?

@Grilled Leeks so you're saying shoving someone over for being loud and annoying is ok? Where have you been growing up?

"Got shoved and fell over", funny how you try to put blame for other man's aggressive actions on the victim of these actions, as if it's his fault that he fell to the ground from applied force. Your bias is seen miles away.

"Got shoved and fell over", funny how you try to put blame for other man's aggressive actions on the victim of these actions, as if it's his fault that he fell to the ground from applied force. Your bias is seen miles away.

@Intimacy Imagine if he had pepper spray instead, the guy seeing it if he gave a warning would probably disengage and even if he didn't his life wouldn't be lost

@Intimacy Imagine if he had pepper spray instead, the guy seeing it if he gave a warning would probably disengage and even if he didn't his life wouldn't be lost

@Taco King damn we got a real paranoid 2a nutjob here.. watch out bro <b>they‘re coming for your guns</b> smh

@Taco King damn we got a real paranoid 2a nutjob here.. watch out bro *they‘re coming for your guns* smh

@Intimacy yeah except that wasn’t what was happening. This wasn’t a case where the guy was on top of him the whole time or even a sense of desperation. He got knocked down, the guy was a good distance away. The guy just killed the other dude because he was embarrassed.

@Intimacy yeah except that wasn’t what was happening. This wasn’t a case where the guy was on top of him the whole time or even a sense of desperation. He got knocked down, the guy was a good distance away. The guy just killed the other dude because he was embarrassed.

@Intimacy He backed away once he drew his gun. There was no danger imminent. He did not have to shoot.

@Intimacy He backed away once he drew his gun. There was no danger imminent. He did not have to shoot.

@MrJibakuwhat's the difference between these two?

@MrJibakuwhat's the difference between these two?

@Alexander Chess really he could have just avoid killing someone by pointing the gun because he started to go back but he shoot him if he is that scared shoot his leg

@Alexander Chess really he could have just avoid killing someone by pointing the gun because he started to go back but he shoot him if he is that scared shoot his leg

@Intimacy actually he could just point the gun at him without shooting him or at least at his leg to stop him but no shoot him at his chest very smart

@Intimacy actually he could just point the gun at him without shooting him or at least at his leg to stop him but no shoot him at his chest very smart

His first thought when pushed was probably absolute joy to the fact he’s able to kill someone followed by<br> “why aren’t you moving towards me”

His first thought when pushed was probably absolute joy to the fact he’s able to kill someone followed by
 “why aren’t you moving towards me”

@Puchowska I wasn’t making an argument I was talking about myself because I have anxiety and tend to over think…that’s why I said I wouldn’t know what to do. I know he shouldn’t have pushed him and the guy also shouldn’t have shot him.

@Puchowska I wasn’t making an argument I was talking about myself because I have anxiety and tend to over think…that’s why I said I wouldn’t know what to do. I know he shouldn’t have pushed him and the guy also shouldn’t have shot him.

Anyone arguing for the innocence of Drejka really just sounds racist lmao

Anyone arguing for the innocence of Drejka really just sounds racist lmao

@Puchowska anyone who actually watched the video can see how he instigated it, plus he has a history of it.  If you dont know the details why are you typing?

@Puchowska anyone who actually watched the video can see how he instigated it, plus he has a history of it.  If you dont know the details why are you typing?

@Grilled Leeks Telling someone not to park in a handicapped parking spot is not instigating conflict unless the person you're saying it to is extremely mentally unstable and thinks physical violence is an adequate response. In which case, physical violence is an adequate response to the physical violence, which is what happened. Don't turn things physical if you don't want to be physically injured as a result. Logic.

@Baby He wasn't 'doing' anything to them, he was just standing there. Bringing physicality into it makes your 'saying to them' comment less dumb so you used it to make it seem like the man was a threat for just talking to the attacker's wife. Attacking someone for saying something you don't like is clearly stupid, so you're trying to make out the man was doing something to them too, which he clearly wasn't, he was just standing there, so what's your argument?

@Aidan Davis He wasn't shot over a parking space, he was shot for attacking someone and making that person feel like his life was in danger. Saying shot over a parking space is a lie, which you're using to manipulate the narrative and you know it. Be real. Also, getting pushed hard while playing football in middle school isn't an attack, it's part of a game. Are you saying these men were playing football so it's fine that the victim got pushed? They're two entirely different situations you're again trying to conflate.

@Taco King 2:28 - 2:32 Markeis is backing up. The situation was deescalating and Markeis was stepping away. He could have very easily just kept the gun trained, stood up and not shot. Why was killing him necessary? There is a 4 second window of opportunity before he shoots. The reason I’m stating this is murder not manslaughter is due to the fact he’s got 4 seconds of thought and time to simply put the weapon away. He would have been in the right here had he just called the police and told them to stay at the situation. Instead, he used that 4 seconds to kill a man over a handicap parking spot. A true American hero.

They were both in the wrong but Drejka was more in the wrong, no intelligent lifeform would disagree with this statement.

They were both in the wrong but Drejka was more in the wrong, no intelligent lifeform would disagree with this statement.

I'm not here to protect the perpetrator, but if he had intended to kill the victim then he would not have shot just once but several times. He had enough time to shoot several times because he had him in his sights the whole time, even after the first shot.  To me it looked like he wanted to push him back so he didn't shoot again. A murderer would either have fired a fatal shot directly or shot several times. I just wanted to say that because many here omit these facts completely.

Keep your hands off people and you won't get shot.

Keep your hands off people and you won't get shot.

IF he had just stayed down he could've sue for being shoved and the guy probably end up few thousand dollar richer.

IF he had just stayed down he could've sue for being shoved and the guy probably end up few thousand dollar richer.

@Taco King You do realize that is unacceptable, right? He stopped and began to move away from Drejka before the firearm was completely drawn and aimed.

The things you're saying are not acceptable as self defense or proper gun usage. You should also understand that he was hit in the lower side, not around the center of the stomach or chest. The former further shows that he was turning and moving away when the shot was fired.

Please never buy a gun because you will most definitely shoot someone at the slightest bit of a physical altercation. Like your not going to give any warnings or see if they're backing off. That also reminds me that Drejka never gave any warning.

@Taco King You have been using biased language: animal, hyperviolent/aggressive, brutally shoved, flung 5 feet, aggressively walked.

After the shove he wasn't running, he wasn't jumping on him, his body language didn't show he was mid attack; he slowly walked while pulling up his pants. Going from body language, he was either going to stand over him or wait and see his response.

@Taco King 36:55 literally talks about how he pulled the gun on other people…but okay. If I walked outside seeing my wife in an altercation with my kids in the car I wouldn’t know what to think. Like I don’t know what he is doing to them or saying to them.

@Taco King 36:55 literally talks about how he pulled the gun on other people…but okay. If I walked outside seeing my wife in an altercation with my kids in the car I wouldn’t know what to think. Like I don’t know what he is doing to them or saying to them.

@Taco King He did not launch him "like 5 feet" you called out someone for exaggerating how many seconds it was, so why are you doing the same? Also are you going to ignore that Drejka used the fact he had a firearm to make threats 3 times between 2012-2028?

@Taco King He did not launch him "like 5 feet" you called out someone for exaggerating how many seconds it was, so why are you doing the same? Also are you going to ignore that Drejka used the fact he had a firearm to make threats 3 times between 2012-2028?

@Taco King You can not shoot a person that is fleeing or withdrawing. Doesn't matter what he did beforehand.

@Taco King You can not shoot a person that is fleeing or withdrawing. Doesn't matter what he did beforehand.

@Taco King Did you watch the video? It was explained.

@Taco King Did you watch the video? It was explained.

@Taco King Do you really think that living in a society where people park in handicapped spaces and people get pushed is worse than a society where people are shot over parking spaces. I have legitimately been pushed harder than Drejka playing flag football in middle school. I don't understand how you could possibly consider this situation self-defense.

@Taco King dude the video explains how Drejka was in the wrong and the Father turns around his body, and gets shot.

@Taco King dude the video explains how Drejka was in the wrong and the Father turns around his body, and gets shot.

@Ethan Irizarry You took the words right out of my mouth.

@Ethan Irizarry You took the words right out of my mouth.

@Intimacy agreed, only if its a civil situation. Civil as in its not a lynching or an immediate dangerous situation for one or the other.

@Intimacy agreed, only if its a civil situation. Civil as in its not a lynching or an immediate dangerous situation for one or the other.

@Taco King lets think about this rationally. Drejka has just started a confrontation with someone over a parking space. Markeis comes over and pushes him down. The adverbs you put before this, do not matter. He was pushed down. Markeis takes a step towards him. Looking at the entire scenario, either Drejka must have provoked Markeis’ wife to an extreme degree or Markeis was simply threatening Drejka. Drejka, then, pulls out a gun. Markeis takes a couple steps backwards and seems to flinch at Drejka pulling out the gun. Drejka fumbles with the gun for a second before firing at Markeis’ midsection. The moment Drejka had the gun out, he was no longer a victim. Markeis had stepped back trying to de-escalate the situation. What may have called for Drejka to fire, is if Markeis ran at Drejka after he pulled the gun. It would’ve only been justified then as he would’ve still been a threat.

@Grilled Leeks if i get knocked over im going to do whatever to keep me and my family safe, no matter the situation.

@Grilled Leeks if i get knocked over im going to do whatever to keep me and my family safe, no matter the situation.

@Taco King All you gotta say is that you’re biased bro... 😌
I’m not defending Markhies on the shove.
I’m not attacking Drejka on the draw.
The shot is where everything takes a turn.
And in my eyes, and many others.
You are defending a manslaughter.
I’m not here for name calling or none of that. But, to sit here and defend some shit like this. That’s wild. 🤣

@Sean Gallagher he killed him because he's a nut case and paranoid.

@Sean Gallagher he killed him because he's a nut case and paranoid.

@Taco King This man will not answer the question. 😂

@Taco King This man will not answer the question. 😂

@Taco King You still haven’t answered my question... Do you think the courts are correct in their decision?

@Taco King You still haven’t answered my question... Do you think the courts are correct in their decision?

@Taco King “Stepping towards him like he was going to stomp Drejka’s head in...”
The over exaggeration is damn near poetry.
Are you Drejka himself?
You sure know how to 𝕖𝕤𝕔𝕒𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕖 𝕖𝕧𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕤.

@Taco King “Stepping towards him like he was going to stomp Drejka’s head in...”
The over exaggeration is damn near poetry.
Are you Drejka himself?
You sure know how to 𝕖𝕤𝕔𝕒𝕝𝕒𝕥𝕖 𝕖𝕧𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕤.

@Leeroy Jenkins No doubt. I don’t think anyone is saying he was right in shoving him, but the escalation of the situation on Drejka’s part is completely unnecessary. Not the draw, but the shot.

@Leeroy Jenkins No doubt. I don’t think anyone is saying he was right in shoving him, but the escalation of the situation on Drejka’s part is completely unnecessary. Not the draw, but the shot.

@Taco King that wasn't self defense lmfao. i'm not defending markeis because he's in the wrong too. nigga was asking to get shot if he was picking petty fights like that. but if you're the owner of a gun, you have a responsibility to use it, well, responsibly. you ever heard of the lines "with great power comes great responsibility"? drejka was not in a life or death situation, nor was markeis a threat to him. if anything drejka should've called the police so that things could've been handled from there. he's in the wrong for trying to take "justice" into his own hands. if you are in possession of a gun, you need to act like the bigger person in a situation. do not try to escalate things, and do not use a gun for petty things like being pushed down. hell, you can visibly see markeis walk away after pushing him down. he wasn't going to back to attack him (unless maybe if drejka retaliated) this is clearly not a case of self defense

@Taco King that wasn't self defense lmfao. i'm not defending markeis because he's in the wrong too. nigga was asking to get shot if he was picking petty fights like that. but if you're the owner of a gun, you have a responsibility to use it, well, responsibly. you ever heard of the lines "with great power comes great responsibility"? drejka was not in a life or death situation, nor was markeis a threat to him. if anything drejka should've called the police so that things could've been handled from there. he's in the wrong for trying to take "justice" into his own hands. if you are in possession of a gun, you need to act like the bigger person in a situation. *do not* try to escalate things, and *do not* use a gun for petty things like being pushed down. hell, you can visibly see markeis walk away after pushing him down. he wasn't going to back to attack him (unless maybe if drejka retaliated) this is clearly not a case of self defense

Not to defend the idiot who took a man's life but that other guy had no need to push him with the force that he did.  Don't be either of these people.

Not to defend the idiot who took a man's life but that other guy had no need to push him with the force that he did.  Don't be either of these people.

@Taco King because as soon as he saw the him reaching for the gun he starts backing up and then from about about 2:30 he is pointing his gun at him and then at 2:32 is when the shot is fired this whole time the man is backing up there isnt a reason to shoot, now let's say when he was pointing a gun at him he was still going towards him or maybe he was going for his pockets for a possible weapon then sure that's justified but he was clearly backing away and then he lied to detectives saying he was still approaching which means he knows he was in the wrong

@Taco King At this point you’re irredeemable. <br>I see so much bias in your language it’s unbelievable when you say shit like “𝑏𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 shoved“ and “𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑛 to the ground“. I have one final question for you, and I’ll be done with this entire argument. Do you think that the courts were correct in charging Drejka with manslaughter? Yes or No.

@Taco King At this point you’re irredeemable.
I see so much bias in your language it’s unbelievable when you say shit like “𝑏𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 shoved“ and “𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑛 to the ground“. I have one final question for you, and I’ll be done with this entire argument. Do you think that the courts were correct in charging Drejka with manslaughter? Yes or No.

@Ryan Scott sure I can agree that if the person didn't have the gun he might have gotten seriously injured I just don't agree he should have taken the shot and I feel very bad for the children I think best case scenario he pulls the gun he backs off and then calls the police and then the man who got shot instead gets arrested for assault or battery

@valko ki To be clear, he only backed away AFTER the gun was being drawn. The BEST case scenario here would be if the guy drew his gun, guy backed up and then he just kept it on him until police came and arrested the other guy. Pulling out the gun was 100% warranted because he DEFINITELY was about to get his ass beat, that much at least is not a lie. The problem is the shooting part.

Yeah no, it's not murder, it's manslaughter. It wasn't premediated and it's not like he pulled the gun on the guy in the middle of an argument, which would be 2nd degree.

Yeah no, it's not murder, it's manslaughter. It wasn't premediated and it's not like he pulled the gun on the guy in the middle of an argument, which would be 2nd degree.

@Christopher just watched the vid and the victim pulled up his pants before shoving then took two steps toward the shooter and was pulling up his pants again but started backing away when he saw a gun. The shooter definitely did not need to shoot but the victim was definitely planning on making his battery charge worth it by doing some more damage.

@Jack Burton when he feel over the guy who shoved him didn’t jump on top of him or anything. Even when he pulled the gun for a solid 2-3 seconds he didn’t do anything. He killed him to protected his honor

@Jack Burton when he feel over the guy who shoved him didn’t jump on top of him or anything. Even when he pulled the gun for a solid 2-3 seconds he didn’t do anything. He killed him to protected his honor

@𝑆𝑎𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠 this

@𝑆𝑎𝑢𝑐𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠 this

@Taco King Also, if someone were to be an actual threat to your life. You wouldn’t take 5 seconds to think before shooting them. You would immediately start dumping rounds into them. Drejka knew this guy wasn’t a threat, he just wanted to take this man’s life.

@Taco King Also, if someone were to be an actual threat to your life. You wouldn’t take 5 seconds to think before shooting them. You would immediately start dumping rounds into them. Drejka knew this guy wasn’t a threat, he just wanted to take this man’s life.

@Taco King “hyperviolent”. When he saw him draw the gun he backed up. If Drejka wasn’t an utter idiot he wouldn’t have started that confrontation in the first place. Sure, Markeis overreacted but are you telling me seriously with as much macho aura you radiate if someone was aggressively barrading your wife with little context you’d not do the same thing he did? Put yourself in Markeis’s shoes. His life wasn’t indanger he fell over lol. He himself said he just had some scrapes and bruises. Compared to what poor Markeis got, who wasn’t even armed btw, he seems to have got off fine. If anything, I’d say Drejka is hyperviolent here. He’s the one who turned a push to the ground into a lethal gunshot wound.

@Taco King You’re still not recognizing the fact that if Markeis really wanted to hurt this guy, why would he give him anytime to reach for anything to begin with? Why not just beat Drejka to a pulp? Maybe it’s because he didn’t see this situation worth pursuing anymore altercation and decided to take a reprieve and wait for Drejka’s next move to decide what to do. Oh well, I guess the only proper thing to do when someone pushes you is too 𝑓𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚.

@Taco King I’ll leave a time stamp for you to see the flaw in this as well. 2:26 the shooter is beginning to draw. Seeing him draw, the man who attacker is now backing away literally covering his body defensively. There is a 2 second period between shots. If this isn’t Billy Badass trying to look for an excuse to shoot somebody, then why didn’t he just stand up, keep the gun trained on him, and call the police? Instead of doing this, he aims after fumbling with the holster, registers where’s he’s aiming and actively fires a lethal shot. Again, why not just shoot the shoulder or leg if you are  going to “fire for self defense”. He had plenty of time to do so.

@Taco King okay yeah. After Markeis shoved Drejka first and took a few steps toward him after he did that. What did Makeis do after that?

@Taco King okay yeah. After Markeis shoved Drejka first and took a few steps toward him after he did that. What did Makeis do after that?

@Taco King to be a threat and a deadly threat are 2 different things and to pull a gun and fire it are 2 different things as well. If i get blindsided and fall to the ground i may pull out a gun and threat to shoot if the attacker continues but if he is unarmed and take 3.5 steps back i have the situation under controll and there is no threat. I become the threat. Now the right thing would be to talk and relax the situation, call the police, and press charges on the attscker with assault. Not kill him.

@Taco King Because a single gunshot would be all it would take to end his life, and both parties were clearly aware of that. If you whip out a pistol and your unarmed opponent backs up and you think they’re <i>still</i> a threat, you must be a paranoid nutjob. “Well for all I knew he was the fucking juggernaut and would tank my bullets as he magically accelerated forward.”

@Taco King Because a single gunshot would be all it would take to end his life, and both parties were clearly aware of that. If you whip out a pistol and your unarmed opponent backs up and you think they’re _still_ a threat, you must be a paranoid nutjob. “Well for all I knew he was the fucking juggernaut and would tank my bullets as he magically accelerated forward.”

@Taco King Normally when people are hostile, they don’t tend to back off from whomever they confront after the hit. Usually after a shove anyone with malice intent would’ve continued their assault with a flurry of blows. He was not a threat at all, especially not with a gun in his face.

@Taco King Normally when people are hostile, they don’t tend to back off from whomever they confront after the hit. Usually after a shove anyone with malice intent would’ve continued their assault with a flurry of blows. He was not a threat at all, especially not with a gun in his face.

@Intimacy or maybe don’t think you’re the handicap parking hero and start harassing people for no reason? He had more than enough time to think and not shoot. The man froze when he saw the gun, he just wanted to shoot him. Probably waiting his entire life for the moment.

@Intimacy or maybe don’t think you’re the handicap parking hero and start harassing people for no reason? He had more than enough time to think and not shoot. The man froze when he saw the gun, he just wanted to shoot him. Probably waiting his entire life for the moment.

@Intimacy well play by play the dude wasn't walking towards him after the shove and then he pulled a gun again nothing too wrong at this point and then he points it at him for around 2 seconds before firing durring this time the man is clearly backing up and is clearly unarmed he just isn't a threat anymore

@DMitri Tompkins Yeah ok.  Thanks for the input.

@DMitri Tompkins Yeah ok.  Thanks for the input.

@Intimacy He was not standing over him lol.   Watch the video before you quote what happened xD

@Intimacy He was not standing over him lol.   Watch the video before you quote what happened xD

Let's see how you react if you get knocked down and someone is standing over you. Situations like that easily devolve into getting your head beaten to a bloody pulp, kicks, punches to the face included, brain damage imminent. How about just don't assault anyone, period. Really not that hard.

@DMitri Tompkins I just said he got charged lol.  If you need to reach that hard maybe you dont really want it xD

@DMitri Tompkins I just said he got charged lol.  If you need to reach that hard maybe you dont really want it xD

@Grilled Leeks incorrect, he was charged with manslaughter, not murder

@Grilled Leeks incorrect, he was charged with manslaughter, not murder

@Jack Burton Don't start confrontations if getting knocked over once makes you feel the need to kill in order to protect yourself.  Guy was clearly looking for a reason to draw his gun, and any person mature enough to carry can see that.

edit:  Oh, and he got charged.   So clearly the justice system agrees with what I said.

I agree but he got the shit knocked out of him. It wasn't some simple shove and he happened to trip and fall over, ffs.

I agree but he got the shit knocked out of him. It wasn't some simple shove and he happened to trip and fall over, ffs.


Being pushed doesnt give you the right to murder a man... I feel so horrible for his family. RIP

@Victoria Pitts Well, I live in Germany. But I have also been to the States for a year. And there are significant differences in mentality and behavior. "Open" agression you do not find as often as in the States, also racism and for sure NO GUNS. Nobody (few expeptions) is allowed to own a gun or carry around. If somebody gets shot here you know it is a motor gang or the mafia ;-) Regards from Berlin!

@Holly Hope  it really isn’t hard to grasp why a man witnessing his significant other (with their children in the car with them) being confronted by an aggressive stranger would go and respond with aggression.

@vocal procrastinating It was a cold-hearted murder by a narcissist who shows no remorse for his actions, better (or worse) yet he actually feels proud of what he has done to ''protect and serve''. But you can't deny that the push was kinda unneeded at the moment. It was mostly justified, he saw his girlfriend getting yelled at so he obviously, like any loving man, jumped in to protect her, but immediately going for a push is not the first thing you should go for. Regardless of whether the push was needed or not, that heartless jackass will be spending 20 years in jail. And seeing what a little coward he is, I'm sure he is getting his ass handed to him in prison. One comment said he already got folded by another inmate on Fab 11 2020, so at least life is giving him a little bit of the karma he deserves.

@vocal procrastinating Nobody deserves to be killed. In the most terrible occassions it takes two to tango. Fact.

@Holly Hope I'm seeing a lot of comments going "I'm not saying he deserved it BUT"

People are more focused on the push than the mediated murder

True, but nobody has the right to push somebody that hard on the street also. Without having asked what the trouble is about. I do not think he got what he deserves but he provoked it.


He killed a guy cuz he got pushed to the floor, how pathetic.


the other part of that rule he quoted is to aim at center mass before you fire...he wanted to kill the guy...


"I've never been in a fight", i just kill people


All because this clown couldn't just mind his own business. 2 tough guys, one armed, one just younger and bigger. Her bf had absolutely no right to just walk straight up and assault him as he did, normal reasonable people are able to talk before resorting to violence. And likewise the shooter had absolutely no right to fire his weapon, he was in no danger, ego bruised, just producing the pistol was probably unwarranted at that time


Lol this fool “I looked around to make sure there weren’t any more threats” 😂 He’s such a cringe poser. And at 1:17 when the detective asks what he does when he finds/doesn’t find wheelchair placards, he can tell the questions aren’t really going his way so he puts his arms on the table and forgets all about his “injury”, the one so bad he had to tie it up with his shirt and shake hands using his left side. This is too fun to watch 🤣


What worries me is why did he take the gun to his regular store which was minutes from his house. Why the need?


the sad thing is, if he had a lawyer, he likely would have gotten off


He's going to get lessons in fighting without a glock. Why wasn't that premeditated murder? He was warned not to do it. He plans it by looking for it, with a gun. He stalks the area. What exactly were his movements that day? Then he ambushes a woman and children. Shoots and kills a fleeing man. Something I saw was the gun follow Marquis as he retreated to the store. He has no record, yet there are other people including women and children he threatened with a gun. I don't get that part. imho this is murder and who says he has just not been caught for other crimes? He knew he was on camera and there was a witness, so of course he would wait for police and play justified. He was too calm for a first kill. Remember how calm the defense said he was? Especially if he was on energy drinks. Hmm possibly a By-law enforcement officer by day and energy drink night stalker ...by night.


Interviewer: I want you to tell us about yourself

Him: I'm a piece of sht human


the prosecutor said marquis name wrong multiple times, why didn't the defendant used that as a defense


Although I do believe this is murder, this just goes towards never, ever talking to the police. In an interrogation they are never there to help, even if you're innocent. A detectives job is to convict, never exonerate


i would not want that defense attorney to defend me in court


The reporters voice took me by surprise, it's just so odd


I will not answer any questions without an attorney present


Probley should have just parked in one of the many open parking spots.. ya know


Stop with the moral equivalency of shoving someone to the ground and shooting someone. I get it you have an absolutist view of both morality and the law; bad is bad is bad. That mindset works great in whatever cartoon world the people who believe it live in. There are misdemeanours and felonies. There are classes of felonies (in some states). Clearly, there is some collective understanding that assault is worse than shoplifting. You know what is absolute though? Death. People are dead or alive and that father is dead.


I even feel sorry for the guy. He's just dumb. No critical thinking in a certain situation, just blindly following some rules whether they're applicable or not.

Надежда Неженка


“When i come up on target!!”  Straight up talking about the person he shot moments ago like it’s range day. People like this don’t NEED a gun. Damn.


It takes so much Karen energy to inspect someone's car for handicap tags.


That guns ownership and open carrying is legal in the USA is absolutely beyond me, this is another life lost because this nutter has a gun. And don't even start about 'responsible gun owners', look at the rest of the world, if there is no gun threat, you don't need a gun. Sure in ie. the UK people are using knives and it is also a problem, but knives will always be inherently less dangerous than a gun.


39:50 *on changing the way he did things*


Wow this incident is extremely disturbing. So much is wrong with this and the woman is sitting in the driver's seat at a convenience store with the child in the car he's such a liar the man was protecting his own and he was backing up when he saw the gun. This guy had murder in his heart his conscience had been seared I'm very angry at his actions extremely angry. WOW. SMH


People legit be so crazy now and days he went looking for a problem like and because I’m psych major bio minor I do understand that people are sometimes disturb but it’s just always be so unprovoked with all these cases


If JCS has taught me anything it's.. DO NOT FUCKING TALK TO THE POLICE WITHOUT A LAWYER


Just imagine a country where guns aren't freely available😵


They sent in white bald detectives to put him at ease, brilliant.


We veterans refer to these kinds of guys as GI-Jerkoffs


Say yes to self defense weapons😂 sick world


This guy is the shooting range die hard, that acts like normal life is one big tactical excercise he did on the range last week. The instructor said he did a good job so he thinks he is a real seal or green beret in combat.


The worst thing is that I truly feel bad for Drejka. He is fully guilty, has deep issues, and belongs in prison. But I feel so bad... He genuinely believes he was doing the right thing and that that's how it's supposed to thing. It seems like because of the level of his emotional awareness, he hasn't been able to process beyond "self-defense" and has remained at a certain developmental stage, at least regarding this issue. Imo, that makes him a danger to society and that's why he should be put away. I feel so sad for him though. He seems like a well-intentioned man (does not mean he actually does have good intentions..).


he was right to pull his gun he was attacked, but only to defuse what might have happened next, no right to fire his gun.


32:05 thats the cutest forensic team I have ever seen.


Telling his story, he is SO enjoying himself.


A small part of me feels bad, because I don’t think this is a man who is purely evil, or has any evil intentions. However, his problem is that he feels like he’s invincible because he’s carrying around a firearm. Sure, McGlockton’s car shouldn’t have been parked in a handicapped spot, but the argument never should have escalated as far as it did. Drejka knew his life wasn’t in danger, but in his mind, being shoved to the ground is a valid reason to take someone’s life. He was so eager to use his gun that once he was in a situation where in his eyes could be justified in the slightest, he took that opportunity. My heart goes out to McGlockton and his family, and his son who had to watch his own father collapse right in front of him.


That wasn’t self defense, it was revenge:
“You pushed me, I have the right to shoot you.”
We cannot have people like this guy in a society, if we want that society to be safe. What’s really disturbing - it chills me to the bones, frankly; when you think about it, is that he was armed already when he argued/had a heated conversation with the woman in the driver’s seat, with her small children in the car..

self defence is generally considered to be arguable when it is evident that the victim is incapable of escaping the situation. if the perpetrator here had just got up from the ground, turned around, and attempted to dash away, and the man who pushed him followed even by one inch, then the perpetrator turned around and shot him, it would be arguable as self defence

@InlikeFlynn I completely agree with this statement.

@InlikeFlynn I completely agree with this statement.

@Rosemary Agreed it doesn't matter legally, but still a dumb idea to go around pushing people to the ground. Being legally in the right doesn't mean you won't end up dead. Never know who has an itchy trigger finger and looking for a reason to shoot someone.

i could do without either of them. fortunately thats kinda what we got.

i could do without either of them. fortunately thats kinda what we got.

The victim stepped back 3 times and he still aimed and shot him. I feel he would still pull the gun without the victim pushed him on the ground.

I feel like he wouldnt have pulled the gun if the guy didnt get aggressively physical. In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it. If he got physical then the guy would wanna get back at him harder, which is shooting the gun. Theres no equal revenge at that point.

Did they check this gun man's criminal history? He doesn't look like a good person.

@Annabella LeForce that’s fucking scary 😟

@Annabella LeForce that’s fucking scary 😟

@Deathkillshoot The Brony of Naboo but it doesn’t matter if the black man has “worse anger issues” - he didn’t deserve to get shot!! Nothing he did, nothing he said would have made him a fair target for deadly violence. No one had any right to shoot him since he wasn’t any deadly threat to anybody anywhere.

The fact that he said he literally could not imagine if he would approach someone if he didn’t have a firearm because he has never ever gone without carrying one.. man is looking for an opportunity to shoot someone

How dare you challenge my ego?! I'm self-appointed parking inspector; I was just doing my job. Drejka was in fear, not for his life, but  in fear of another ego blow. We HAVE to learn to tame that ego.

@Joe King personally I disagree, but that is an interesting perspective.

@Joe King assaulting someone deserves death in your view?  Even in these circumstances ? Man you're brutal in a bad sense.

I gotta say that I do not feel sorry for the guy who got shot at all. At the end of the day you cannot sneak up behind somebody and fucking assault them just because they were arguing with your wife. The fact that he had zero issue immediately reacting with violence(in front of his kids no less) says everything I need to know about him. Hell just the fact that they decided to park in a handicapped zone with their kids present leads to me to believe that they were teaching their kids all kinds of fucked up behavior.

"Oh but he was yelling at her!" I don't care, don't assault people you fools. Come on now we learned this in kindergarten.

Let me be clear however, Michael was NOT within his right to kill this man and absolutely deserved his sentence. He could have easily charged this loser with assault and would have won 100%.

That said all I'm seeing here is natural selection at play. If you think you can just go through life assaulting people who inconvenience you then good luck because you're going to need it. Say what you will but at the end of the day I've already won because I'm not some dumbass who got shot for trying to be tough.

thats what I saw, if the dude continued to attack and charge then maybe, but he stopped next to his wife.  That looks like a man protecting his family, dude should have minded his own business, its a frikking parking spot!!!

@Kira Nopeee. In most countries and states, its `You push me , i can shoot you` If you have a gun in hand and a person pushes you to ground you can use it( or tries to push you to ground). I think kyle rittenosue case is a perfect example of that. But you can't use the gun the way this guy used. Practically as soon as markeis stopped advancing after michael draw his gun. The reason to fire it was gone. He could've kept it drawn as a protective measure but shooting was totally illegal.

@Kira but the push did nothing.. no threat remained. Done deal

@Kira but the push did nothing.. no threat remained. Done deal

A push can lead to someone's death though... there was a story of this renter who was pushed by the young man he was trying to help, and he died cause he landed hard on his head. Sorry, if you're going to physically assault someone get ready for the consequences. Of course, since the guy initiated the shouting match and was the original aggressor his claim to self defense is gone. But your statement “You pushed me, I have the right to shoot you.” is absolutely correct, despite your sarcasm. If you go around assaulting people for no reason, a simple push could be the end of your life as well as the life of the person you pushed.

Like when I played dodgeball and really got this kid good. He was so enraged that he came up right behind me when I wasnt looking and through the ball hard on my back... Nothing but racist inferiority complex, and revenge or a mix

@Lotus Auer telling someone they shouldn't be parking there isn't harassment 🤦♂🤦♂

@The Adventures of Steve-Marco sorry, was he supposed to ask for consent to shove him? Did he ask consent to go harassing that woman about how the car was parked?

Also cant have guys shoving people over blind sided 🤷♂

Also cant have guys shoving people over blind sided 🤷♂

@InlikeFlynn Hell I saw a handicapped person park in a able spot. Man was I angry. How dare they. I let the tyres down on his wheel chair.😜

@Sharpshooter   You're right, a light shove done against someone who is unbalanced will cause them to fall over but this was no light shove. Even with the grainy footage, you can see Markeis putting his weight behind that push. Fighting for most people is uncommon as most people try to resolve situations using words and only use violence as a last resort. As to whether or not being knocked prone and helpless against an unknown assailant is terrifying or not I suppose it depends on whether or not you like being helpless. It shouldn't just be the yanks who are soft, fighting is assault and carries a jail sentence and ultimately I wouldn't say Americans are soft so much as cautious. In the U.S. people like suing each other. The national pastime is not baseball it's suing your neighbor's pants off for every tiny infraction of the law. Imagine trying to start fights in a society that wants to steal your money at every opportunity.

It's also VERY worth mentioning 4 others came forward to attest he harassed them in their vehicles as well, one of which was a woman with two children in the vehicle as well, and stated he even threatened them that he had a gun. That's pretty much all I need to hear to know he'd been thinking of doing it for a while, even if just subconsciously him doing it consistently was just a means to give him the opportunity.

Well you can be armed whenever you want. What's disturbing to me is that he thinks it makes him some sort of arbiter of law. I couldn't imagine starting a fight when I carry

@Zachary Green Napoleon complex? Interesting take... Funny how there's no word for overly aggressive tall men who take advantage of their size to bully shorter men. It's always the short guy's fault. As if short guys don't have it hard enough already from the get go.

@Zebness If the white guy was bigger, would the black guy have been so aggressive or would he have shown him more respect and tried to de-escalate? It goes both ways.

@Deathkillshoot The Brony of Naboo I'm not, I simply represented what I would also do in that case, had I been him. <br>I have a concealed carry and have been in confrontations before. Hell, I've been sucker punched and didn't feel the need to pull my gun. This man let his ego be inflated by the fact that he had a firearm. Plain and simple.

@Deathkillshoot The Brony of Naboo I'm not, I simply represented what I would also do in that case, had I been him.
I have a concealed carry and have been in confrontations before. Hell, I've been sucker punched and didn't feel the need to pull my gun. This man let his ego be inflated by the fact that he had a firearm. Plain and simple.

@Zachary Green no what i see is a white dude with anger issues and a black dude with WORSE ANGER ISSUES

@Zachary Green You're right seeing someone yelling at your wife over a stupid parking space in a nearly empty parking lot would make anybody pissed off but I would say that most people wouldn't resort to violence immediately. Most people would use words first, yell at Michael tell him to go away but Markeis said nothing and attacked Michael causing Michael to panic and pull his gun. They both handled this situation poorly the difference is that one of them walked away from this instance and the other is dead and that fills me with sadness. It shouldn't have turned out this way.

@InlikeFlynn i think the guy was not 'fleeing' but trying to rub it in his face along with is wife when he saw the gun and tried to deescalate the situation with a hero wannaber who was very angry at the time so i say it should have been 2 years in solitary not 20 in reg.

I think you are doing Michael a bit of a disservice here. That was more than just a tiny push. Markeis pushed him so hard that he flew onto his back. If you have ever been attacked, beaten, or knocked prone then you would know how terrifying that is. Michael was justified in pulling his gun but shooting an unarmed man who was clearly trying to escape is disgusting. I get this sick feeling in my gut while watching the video and seeing it happen. That being said, every American has the right to bear arms (with the exception of felons) and there was nothing wrong with Michael having one on hand to defend himself. If you aren't physically powerful and know that a small breeze can knock you over let alone a grown 200-pound man then I suggest you buy a gun to protect yourself. It might save your life someday.

@Zachary Green thank you for an even better explanation. Notes taken. Cheers

Absolutely. This man has a classic Napoleon complex that directly coincides with his fetish for being a hero. He's a danger to everyone around him. He was battered first, yes, but that wasn't grounds to shoot someone who was stepping away from you. They were already showing a digression in escalation. The 2 seconds between the two men before he decided to shoot, regardless of circumstance, is what really gives me chills.

I swear these exact words were in my mind when I heard the prosecution's testimony. It was revenge. Drejka was pushed, he fell on his sorry ass, got angry and punished the guy by shooting him to take revenge for shoving him. The angle at which the bullet entered the body was another argument which I thought should have been risen. It wasn't the front side of the chest or torso, nor anywhere near the sternum. The wound was almost a perfect flank underneath  the ribs. This case was simply about a small angry petty little SOB pretending to be a cop who wasn't even fit to be a security guard at a remote petrol station.


no way Mr.McGlockton was killed by a Glock.


What I’m shocked by is that the prosecutor uses the term “perfect shot”, with the bullet going through the lungs and heart. <br>That would never be used here in Europe, as it’s quite the opposite of perfect. Only in America I guess. Gun slingers...

What I’m shocked by is that the prosecutor uses the term “perfect shot”, with the bullet going through the lungs and heart.
That would never be used here in Europe, as it’s quite the opposite of perfect. Only in America I guess. Gun slingers...

You missed the point. The shot was perfect in that it was extremely likely to be lethal. That’s virtually impossible to dispute. It would be a lethal shot in the U.S., Europe, and anywhere else in the world. He’s not saying that it was morally or ethically perfect.


35:02 Gun Control Now because people with deadly weapons often cannot control themselves when they are frightened, angry, drunk or depressed. 'It was over when that gun came out.'


Eye for a eye. Just cap the genius and be done with it.


That poor women and her kids :(
Absolutely heart breaking. My prayers go out to her
Lost her lover and father to her kids for absolutely no good reason other than (in my opinion) racism… I have a strong feeling that he wouldn’t have shot him if he was white- also assumed authorities would take his side 🙄

Theres nothing racist about this case at all.


Carrying a weapon will give any normal person an elevated sense of safely, which easily can become a sense of empowerment to initiate confrontation that they otherwise would not engage. This video is a perfect example, he is walking up to a parked car with unknown people inside, is verbally aggressive over parking in a handicap spot, and then find himself pushed to the ground from someone he did not expect. Psychologically, this is very likely a moment he has been anticipating for many years, some type of confrontation that he perceives requires deadly force. He is, the real life example of Travis Bickle from the movie Taxi Driver. In his mind, he is the vigilante hero that was confronting out of control criminals. What I wonder about, is how many unreported confrontations had he initiated over the years, but the people backed away because they became aware he had a gun. Such confrontations would further escalate his increasing sense of power and authority over others that led to this deadly encounter. He had developed a bit of a God complex. In otherwords, he was going to shoot somebody someday, it simply was a matter of time. And it would not surprise me if, like in the movie Taxi Driver, he practiced at home in the mirror saying something similar to "Are you talking to me?" and then practices repeatedly pulling out the weapon pointing it at himself in the mirror as if mirror image were someone pointing a gun at him. Another common term that could be applied is Self-fulling prophecy.

People who lawfully carry weapons stop criminals and defend themselves and others lawfully every day, my husband included. This man was mentally unstable. I am for the 2nd amend, however, I am also for background checks and not letting people with mental histories of any kind purchase weapons.

I disagree that carrying a gun gives you a sense of safety making you more likely to confront. My husband carries and he avoids any and all conflict BC he is carrying and would never want to use his weapon. People who carry don’t automatically want to use the gun…most de-escalate bc they don’t want to have to hurt anyone. This man was absolutely looking for a reason to use his gun…it was not self defense. In my opinion if you’re the aggressor then you are not acting in “self defense” you’re the perpetrator, the violent one…and this man took away a father, husband, son, and friends life away from many who loved him, for no reason at all. I pray for the victims family, and I pray this is a lesson that carrying a gun should be reason to avoid confrontation and like the commenter said it’s a LAST RESORT when you feel like you or a loved one is in serious danger. The LAST resort.

Can I like your comment 100 more times? 🤸♀🤸♀🤸♀

Can I like your comment 100 more times? 🤸♀🤸♀🤸♀

Ooh. You put so much effort into sounding like the JCS narrator, then hit us with "self-fulling" 🥴

I carry and avoid all confrontation at all costs. I never want to actually have to use my weapon on a living being but will if my kids' lives are being threatened. It's very last resort. Just difference in personalities I guess.

@Christina Galler
if you start being physical then you’re asking for it. You don’t know if these people are crazy and might have a weapon.

I don't know that you're ASKING TO BE SHOT, but I do agree that if you do this you're inviting trouble. But the fact remains that Drejka ultimately initiated the entire sequence of events:

If he didn’t push him like that, I’m sure the outcome would be so much different.

True, but also, if Drejka didn't harass someone over a parking space, NONE of what followed would have transpired, either. And he has a history of doing this, so maybe he was asking for it? Considering the following history, it follows that if the shooting was "instant karma", then Drejka getting pushed and ultimately incarcerated was "delayed karma" for all of the following:

A truck driver parked in that same spot.
3 months prior to this incident, Drejka confronted one Richard Kelly, who claims that at some point during the argument Drejka told him he was going to shoot him.

A woman who drove too slow through a school zone: On December 12, 2012, a woman told a Largo Police Department officer that a man driving a black Toyota truck (later identified as Drejka) pointed a gun at her and the passengers in the vehicle.

 A teen didn’t drive through a yellow light. On January 10, 2012, Tyler Smith was driving with a friend when a traffic light turned yellow. Smith decided not to drive through the light and stopped his vehicle. Drejka honked his horn and yelled at Smith. Drejka held a black handgun out the driver’s side window of his vehicle and motioned for Smith to walk back to his truck.

Then there was also a brake-checking incident. What he did can cause a major accident. And Drejka was cited for this.

@Christina Galler
-if you start being physical then you’re asking for it. You don’t know if these people are crazy and might have a weapon.-

I don't know that you're ASKING TO BE SHOT, but I do agree that if you do this you're inviting trouble. But the fact remains that Drejka ultimately initiated the entire sequence of events:

-If he didn’t push him like that, I’m sure the outcome would be so much different.-

True, but also, if Drejka didn't harass someone over a parking space, NONE of what followed would have transpired, either. And he has a history of doing this, so maybe _he_ was asking for it? Considering the following history, it follows that if the shooting was "instant karma", then Drejka getting pushed and ultimately incarcerated was "delayed karma" for all of the following:

_A truck driver parked in that same spot._
3 months prior to this incident, Drejka confronted one Richard Kelly, who claims that at some point during the argument Drejka told him he was going to shoot him.

_A woman who drove too slow through a school zone:_ On December 12, 2012, a woman told a Largo Police Department officer that a man driving a black Toyota truck (later identified as Drejka) pointed a gun at her and the passengers in the vehicle.

 _A teen didn’t drive through a yellow light._ On January 10, 2012, Tyler Smith was driving with a friend when a traffic light turned yellow. Smith decided not to drive through the light and stopped his vehicle. Drejka honked his horn and yelled at Smith. Drejka held a black handgun out the driver’s side window of his vehicle and motioned for Smith to walk back to his truck.

Then there was also a brake-checking incident. What he did can cause a major accident. And Drejka was cited for this.

@The Great Pumpkin I never did say what he did is justified. But if you start being physical then you’re asking for it. You don’t know if these people are crazy and might have a weapon. If he didn’t push him like that, I’m sure the outcome would be so much different. Maybe I’m watching too many instant karma videos.

@Christina Galler <br>I would suggest you look into Drejka's history, too. He had been pulling the gun when people’s driving annoyed him at least four times, meaning it's possible there are more undocumented instances. Two of these were on women with kids in the car. He also pulled on two teenagers who slowed down for a yellow instead of running it. In short, he - much like many aggressive cops or wannabe vigilante/security/police types - has a past history of aggressive and anti-social behavior prior to some case that ends tragically for someone.

@Christina Galler
I would suggest you look into Drejka's history, too. He had been pulling the gun when people’s driving annoyed him at least four times, meaning it's possible there are more undocumented instances. Two of these were on women with kids in the car. He also pulled on two teenagers who slowed down for a yellow instead of running it. In short, he - much like many aggressive cops or wannabe vigilante/security/police types - has a past history of aggressive and anti-social behavior prior to some case that ends tragically for someone.

@Christina Galler
was that a disabled parking space?

I've actually read that it wasn't [a legal handicapped parking space], although this came out after the fact. And Drejka might have been justified in drawing his weapon because he was attacked, however he was not justified in shooting the weapon. Drejka was also a guy with a documented history of confronting people over the same parking spot (which at the time was poorly painted and easy to miss if you weren’t paying attention).

@Christina Galler
-was that a disabled parking space?-

I've actually read that it _wasn't_ [a legal handicapped parking space], although this came out after the fact. And Drejka might have been justified in _drawing_ his weapon because he was attacked, however he was not justified in _shooting_ the weapon. Drejka was also a guy with a documented history of confronting people over the same parking spot (which at the time was poorly painted and easy to miss if you weren’t paying attention).

@The Great Pumpkin was that a disabled parking space? If so then Drejka was just telling them to not use that space. If Drejka is that bad, he would have shot those people in the car. It was only until someone else got physical when he took out his gun. That’s how I judge the video. I don’t know him or the full story that we don’t get to hear or see.

@Christina Galler
In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it.

Technically the guy who appointed himself the parking space monitor (Drejka) initiated the entire subsequent chain of events that led to his own demise and the death of another person. He created the conflict even if for some perverse reason he felt in his head that he was in the right. And I do think the push was a violent overreaction, but nonetheless Drejka inserted himself into those people's lives that day. And he did it while carrying.

@Christina Galler
-In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it.-

Technically the guy who appointed himself the parking space monitor (Drejka) initiated the entire subsequent chain of events that led to his own demise and the death of another person. He created the conflict even if for some perverse reason he felt in his head that he was in the right. And I do think the push was a violent overreaction, but nonetheless Drejka inserted himself into those people's lives that day. And he did it while carrying.

Very well said. I agree. You are so smart

Very well said. I agree. You are so smart

You could've just said Ban guns. The thing about that is, in countries where guns are banned, people actually don't feel afraid to verbally speak their mind when they see someone breaking the law, like the person parking in a handicapped space. It's win-win, both sides. No overly aggressive responses to verbal confrontations; no vigilantes.

Have you heard about a  very similar case when the shooter, Mike Dunn shot a teenager in a truck at a convenience store for playing loud music. Dunn said, "Are you talking to me?"

@Frank Paya I heard most Franks can't type their way out of a wet paper Youtube comment.

@Christina Galler A lesson for the living, never get physically aggressive with anyone, lets alone a stranger who might be unstable and carrying a weapon. The killed man was ticked off that some strange man was verbally hostile to his wife\GF, and ended up dead because he over-reacted. The same can be said for Drejka, he over-reacted to someone parking in a handicapped spot, and now he will spend the rest of his life in prison. Bottom line, two strangers over-reacted to a very trivial situation, and both lost their lives over it.

@Christopher Anderson He turned a verbal fight to a physical one. He aggressively started the physical fight first. That’s why you don’t do that to stranger coz u don’t know who has weapons.

Oof- yeah I can agree with that, tho I live in alaska and I open carry/conceal carry a lot. Mostly when I’m going fishing. I grew up shooting guns (it’s literally one of my earliest memories) but I was also taught at a young age that you don’t A) point that thing at anyone or anything you don’t plan to shoot B) a very high level of muzzle awareness/gun safety C) you’re absolutely RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERY BULLET that leaves the chamber so you better know your target and know your backdrop.
  We don’t require any kind of formal training here to open carry/conceal carry and to me it is concerning. I think people should at least have to pass a basic safety course and background check in order to carry a gun. I agree that it gives some a false sense of security and they think they’re a badass and don’t fully comprehend or understand pulling a gun on someone. I was also in the military for 14 years where I deployed 4 times and carried at least one gun 24/7 during that time. It’s nothing for me to carry a gun/just feels like an extension of myself- BUT pulling that same gun on someone is a huge deal to me- it’s something I NEVER want to have to do and I find the though actually terrifying. I’ve used it for warning shots for a moose when I was with my dog team once and also to warn off a sow grizzly bear who had a cub when I was salmon fishing. That was incident enough for me but it’s also a great tool to have to protect yourself in the back woods. I don’t carry it if I go to the gas station or grocery store (unless I’m going fishing)
   I really can agree with the fact that not all people should be able to carry firearms if they have a history of violence or are not right in the head. But on the flip side- there are just regular people like me that use it for self protection/protection of my dear sleddogs when in the Alaskan back country.

@Christina Galler they were both in the wrong, but if Drefka had been a man and fought with his fists instead of immediately going to the gun like a coward, a father would still be alive and Drefka would have his worthless life back.

I think he was mad at them parking at the disable parking spot. I feel like he wouldnt have pulled the gun if the guy didnt get aggressively physical. In a way, the guy who pushed him hard was instigating it. If he got physical then the guy would wanna get back at him harder, which is shooting the gun. Theres no equal revenge at that point.

lmao i could picture him saying thay inside my head as i read the words:-) damn that movie is so good ……..

（｀・ω・＇）＜３　？？

apparently he had threatened people before with his gun several times, so you are correct. This guy is a wuss wuss

@Bender_82 moral equivalency at its finest.

@Bender_82 moral equivalency at its finest.

Parking in the handicap spot and pushing someone on the ground over an argument, knowing cops won't do shit about it is the type of thing that Taxi Driver is based on though. The assault was as unjustified as the shooting and they both paid severely.

@Neal Noble -- yeah, I agree about Drejka. He had complaints on the record of brandishing his weapon at other drivers, one of whom had children in the car. <br>His attitude is scary & creepy.

@Neal Noble -- yeah, I agree about Drejka. He had complaints on the record of brandishing his weapon at other drivers, one of whom had children in the car.
His attitude is scary & creepy.

@P M The contents of the video are very interesting as well as the ripple effects.

@P M The contents of the video are very interesting as well as the ripple effects.

@P M Yes, all normal individuals that carry a weapon should have sense of responsibility but is not always true. I assume it is for most.

Any normal person carrying a weapon gets a heightened sense of responsibility, as would any normal martial artist, that’s why you don’t see normal people (meaning what’s common) flipping out on handicap parking and firing shots when they don’t have to. <br>Which would be criminal. Which is what you described.

Any normal person carrying a weapon gets a heightened sense of responsibility, as would any normal martial artist, that’s why you don’t see normal people (meaning what’s common) flipping out on handicap parking and firing shots when they don’t have to.
Which would be criminal. Which is what you described.

@P M The description is about mental and emotional instability\maturity that can lead to a crime. A stable adult of his age would have unlikely fired the weapon. But, even before it got that far, a stable person would most likely walked away rather than continue to escalate the confrontation over a car parked in a spot reserved for handicap drivers.

Your describing criminal behavior, not normal people who are able to defend themselves, armed or not.

You are obviously are unfamiliar with the subject matter.

You are obviously are unfamiliar with the subject matter.

Hey "F Lee Bailey",<br> just stick to the facts, don't creatively make- up a story, that you have no way of knowing has any truth, whatsoever.

Hey "F Lee Bailey",
 just stick to the facts, don't creatively make- up a story, that you have no way of knowing has any truth, whatsoever.

@cika blyat Ideally, the gun lobby and avid gun owners would be the ones who push the strongest to keep firearms out of the hands of people who are likely to misuse weapons. Such as levels of proficiency and ethical use of weapons. Level 1: demonstrate that a person can handle a weapon correctly, store is safely, know what to do after it has been fired, etc. Advancing to higher levels would entitle individuals to own more powerful weapons because they have proven to the gun owning community (their peers) that they have acquired the skills and experience needed to handle those weapons and are emotionally\mental stable. They rise to become the best of the best, highly respective individuals for their skills and very high ethical standards on how they use of weapons.

@OceanSwimmer Yeah. I don't make sweeping assumptions about those who own guns. I lived in Alaska where is it was wise to own a gun because bears are everywhere, including the major cities. Such people tend to be smart about owning a weapon. Hypothetically, it is reasonable to conclude that Drekja could have just as easily run another car off the road with his truck because the driver did not properly signal a lane change. The driver dies as a result, and Drekja justifies his actions to the police in same way, he perceives that his actions were required, it was him or the driver of the other car, which he would point out the driver started the deadly the counter by not properly signaling a lane change and Drekja had no other course of action to save himself.

yeah this is basically what happens when people dont train or check laws, a gun is an extremely usefull self defense tool but this guy really didnt know how to use it hell he could have just flashed the gun at him the confrontation probably would have finished then still tho he should not have started the confrontation by parking by them and making an argument

Good comment. It is absolutely right that the person with the weapon is more likely starting a confrontation because last but not least he will not get harmed in a fight. Maybe Dr. Grande is known here. Within another but similar case he stated, that the one with the weapon has the duty to care about calming down and de-escalating the situation.


Blah blah comment. Love you JCS. I know what you stand for, keep being based.


For anyone who is interested in how long he got: He was sentenced to 20 years for this in October 2019. Also 2 days ago, Feb, 2020 he was attacked in jail with a lock in a sock and had to be put in protective custody for his own safety..

@blacknosugarnocream so im an idiot because our opinions are different from each other.!! You let OJ get away with murder. Your American system is funny from an unbiased foreign person. Im from Nort East India, we are not these typical Indian rather a tibeto burman decindent.
So,
Why they park in handicap spot.?
Why the father shoved him instead of trying to reason him. The driver was physically big and was a bully here, he knew he can slapt around that little guy, that's why he pushed him. But he bullied the wrong person. Clearly we all knew the killer is some sort of a looney.

@Erin Dorrell , I remember the cans from old prison movies like Bad Boys

Hurrah... hope it was a right clunk on top of his ridiculous empty bullying dome.

@Jordan Brooks OMG That made me laugh so hard. Many thanks

20 years!! This is not fair at all. A guy with money and fame killed his ex wife and friends and got free of all charges. On the other hand, a guy trying to do the right thing was attacked by wrong doer and had to kill the guy for self defense is sentenced to 20 years. You Americans are funny.

Haha what a threatening world he lives in 😂

Richard Porter needs the lock in a sock himself. He can't possibly know what's being said between the parties. But what is abundantly clear is that the G.I. Joe wannabe is the one who initiated everything. Sure looks to me like the boyfriend was offended by what he was saying to his girlfriend and pushed him down. He got a boo boo and his feelings were hurt so he shot him. Too scared to fight him like a real man would do. By the way, how do you know he got the lock in a sock?

Ryan Depaulo: Degenerate Gambler Yeah, sorry. I meant to say Feb 2020. 😅

I knew him getting hurt in prison would happen 🤣

Joseph N so he’s not that tough in jail.

@S K Sounds like a Dr Suess book gone wrong...

Lock in a sock.

Sounds like a new product thats just came out.

He probably had an altercation with another inmate for using the handicap toilet  😂😂😂

beat with a lock in a sock, falls to ground...reaches for gun, here we go again...remembers where he is, oh shit!!!

beat. Surprised prisoners can still have locks. They were using the lock sock as a weapon in the 90s and probably earlier.

They put him in protective custody? Shame.

goddamn, this man is a time traveler too! you'd ought to expect he'd go back and fix this from ever happening


just whos side was this defendant guy on?


I was waiting for him to use the Shakira Defense, 'Hips don't lie.'


he def doesn't look like he talked to her "politely" in the video......