Laying in bed 🛌 all comfy 🛌 Watching these fools smash 💥 there lives up 🔝😜👍 I’d sure hate to be you 😜👍 especially being 5/o 👮🏻♂


The scary part of this is the man genuinely believing he did no wrong. He was scared of a big black guy that pushed him to the ground because of a confrontation he started of him yelling at his girlfriend with his multiple children around so like a coward he pulls his gun out presumably from racial stereotypes assuming the mans going to shoot or stab him and purposely takes aim and shoots this man knowing damn well he was backing away. He was just looking for an excuse to shoot somebody.

you're literally the only person perpetuating racial stereotypes, OP.

@Kat L-K the blow habit is killing me and I quit playing COD 2 years ago

@COD ProCamp coke is probably better for lives than cod

@COD ProCamp You know this is about serious stuff, right? These are real people who have gone through real shit- is this really the right place to troll?

You’re terrible person, too say such a thing, no matter what a person has done no one deserves death. Mistakes don’t =death, then everyone in the world would be dead. Pls think before you comment


Get pushed to the ground
Get shot dead
Yep, seems equal to me...


iffy 1 never put your hands on folks 2 if u seen him stop shouldn't have shot just tell him to back up but then again I wasn't there in the heat of the moment he probably legit thought he was in some shit cant say if I would have shot or  not but u feel like if he gave homeboy a verbal warning after he pulled the gun nobody would have died


The defence attorney was awful and cringe. I almost couldn’t even get through that


What sucks is that the sheriff first declined to charge, it was the state prosecutors who came through on this.


Is anybody else curious what the face is behind the magnificent voice of JCS?


Lawyer job is basically a class competition who made better presentation, Exept evryone hates u 😭


Anyone notice how this guys sprained wrist seems to become painless every time he gets hot and bothered and starts raising his voice, talking fast, and whipping his sore wrist around, then he babies it again when he starts to calm down?


The fact that he’s making false statements about the nature of the initial engagement tells you all you need to know about a man walking around with a gun. He’s instigating conflict in the HOPE that he’s able to use his weapon.

Hell_Pike there are plenty of folks walking around with that mentality. They all have this perverse hero fantasy rattling around their skulls. Many of them literally praying they are involved in a scenario where they are the “good guy with a gun”’ that puts a halt to some forthcoming tragedy. It’s extremely misguided, and makes for dangerous gun owners.

Couldn't help but feel that way when I first saw the video. Deep down he's been waiting for that day. The sick power fantasy.

Tbh, even if you're in the right, it's not surprising to be in a defensive state considering the fact that you could think you might've just done something wrong. When things like these happen in the spur of the moment, you can never tell.


Strange..... So this is what we call justiice...


It’s truly amazing how many times the interrogator asks him “so he did something to provoke a fear for you life, right?” only for him to respond “no! Absolutely not! I had no reason at all to fire!”

@J B Nah but fr. What do you say to the fact that blacks, hispanics, asians, and other races are also sometimes let out during investigations??

@J B It sounds like he was trying to help him but he was actually just trying to cooperate with him in a way that he would not ask for legal counsel or not stop giving information

@biggie maggot talking about the other comment

Y’all need to take investigators with a grain of salt. These people are not your friends. But you think they are on your side Bc that’s what they want you to think. I’ll stop trying to teach the ignorant and hope your knowledge of police work/ investigation has nothing to do with race IN THIS CASE.

@J B 36:39 child. This has nothing to do with race but how this shit goes. You clearly don’t understand how some INVESTIGATIONS are handled .

@Kayla Short oh yeah.. pointing out systemic racism “spreads” separation. Let’s all just ignore it then. Wouldn’t want to “spread separation” because apparently that’s all that matters.

@J B It’s a little childish to assume he was let go because he was white. Sure it isn’t fair when it happens, but there are plenty of black, Hispanic, and Asian people who were allowed to leave after interrogation despite being guilty. It is not a color thing, it’s a criminal justice thing; claiming it to be the former is lazy, and you can’t even prove it, so why say something like that which only spreads separation and does not really aim to fix the problem you’re pointing out?

@Jennifer x9000 i read your other comment and that tactic makes sense, so ill agree on that

still don’t just say people who disagree with you are either dumb or kids lmao.

@Jennifer x9000 Michael Drejka was released from custody right after this interrogation. He killed a black man and he was allowed to walk free for a month. Didn’t even have to make bail. If that isn’t the epitome of white privilege then please tell me what that is.

@J B What the other commenter said. Watch some other videos so you'll understand. He definetly wasn't trying to help him.

@Nigel TV What you mean by "opinion"? What Jennifer said is not a matter of opinion bruh :D It's a fact

@Jennifer x9000 that's why I love opinions. We all have them.

@J B you understand WHY.... he’s not trying to help him. He’s trying to be his buddy so the dude doesn’t lawyer up. And so the perp can incriminate him self more. Is this your first video? You should watch more videos to understand this tactic

@J B fr, normally they pick apart people like this but these guys were like- trying to hold his hand the whole time

Interrogator was trying to help him.. sounds about white


This is what Michael McGlockton's Father said to Drejka in court:
"You deserve to die in prison," he said. "In the Bible, it says that in order to get into heaven we must forgive those who trespass against us. At this point in my life, I am not there yet. And if it just so happens that the Lord chooses to take me before I come to terms with this, then I will see you in hell, where you and I will finish this. Mark my words."

Holy Shit

@Cindy Tartt I know. You wanting me to die makes you just as evil as me. But don't worry, that's just human nature. I'm not taking it personally.

@Brandon Rogers True, and that's what people in the YT comments don't seem to understand. Threatening and insulting criminals does not make them better than the criminals. Yet I am labeled as the troll here and the angry, violent YT mob thinks that they are the "good" people. I bet half of them would do the same or even worse if they were in Drejkas position.

@Jon Lees Fortunately, I am not. The country needs to be cleansed.

@LL Why? You seem to give me attention. I like it here :)

@Gunnysmack I'm not. I just hate when people start fights and then cry about the consequences.

Hateful person who attacked a man's hateful father condemning himself to eternal damnation. I'm not religious but this is hilarious.

The prosecutor says Michale macglockton about 10 times.... I thought Michal was the defandants name ...

Imagine being ordered to forgive someone who rape and murder your whole family. You hug and forgive this man, or you arent allowed in to heaven. Sounds like a good god doesnt it?

To me it sounds more like the Devil having a little fun, before you stand infront of him.

I understand that going through life, with hatred or revenge serves no one any good. But what i cannot do, with someone who murder my loved ones, is forgive them. Atleast not nilly willy. Because a book commands me to do so.

I hope he doesn't mind if I take that and use it at some point. Hopefully I won't be in that situation, but damn that's good

@Sadistic Demon hope you're joking, everyone just report him

@Sadistic Demon I can’t tell if you’re a troll or not with a screen name like that and with you expressing such a lack of empathy with such conviction

@Sadistic Demon What do you even mean by this

@Juan Vidaurre it was a quote in an article, I think I just searched for where drejka was now

@Zombie4Skin ah shit must have autocorrected or something

@Jon Leesyou said Michael McGlocktons dad, it’s Markeis McGlocktons dad

@Jon Lees you wrote Michael, not Markeis. Not important though haha...is there a video of his dad's statement?

Wow if that is true it's one of the most badass & beautiful things ever said in real life.

Is there a video of him saying that?

Also I don’t wanna be one of those assholes that correct people but you got the names switched up, it’s Markeis McGlockton


I hate it when people without a disability park in disabled spaces, but I wouldn't kill them.

@Sa Kura luckily in this country, we have disabled badges to help us with that.

I mean you’re right, but disabilities aren’t always visible.

Well, if you say that either you didn't watch the video, or you did not understand it.


I can only imagine how this case would’ve been if there hadn’t been security footage.

He would hae probably walked, sadly, in todays climate and how things are.

@u.gly_d.uckling But there was evidence, so how do you know what bias would've showed up, had there not been evidence?

@Extraordinary ActSofGlasS Google “speaking figuratively meaning” that should help an odiot

@Daniel G that’s a big problem. I’m against cops killing anybody that doesn’t present an immediate threat. But I don’t work in the media so I’m not going to take the blame for what they choose to cover. Having said that, I’ve seen firsthand how black people can be treated differently by police. Too often, there is no attempt to de-escalate a situation regardless of the race of the person. Too often, police respond to calls that they’re untrained and illequipped to handle. So my problem, as I said before, are when racist dipshits flock to the internet to defend people that are killing other people. I make mistakes at work. But when I make a mistake, nobody is going to die. If I were in a position where that was a possibility, I’d be speaking up. I would be demanding proper training. I wouldn’t want to worry about how I was going to sleep at night. I wouldn’t be walking around with my chest puffed out, acting like my “brothers” are above the law and can do no wrong.

@Daveyhavok832 Her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, admitted to firing at police as they entered the apartment but claimed he believed the officers were intruders. He allegedly struck Officer Jonathan Mattingly.

In the search warrant affidavit filed before the raid of Taylor’s apartment, police said they believed Glover could be keeping drugs and money at her home.  During the recorded jail call after the raid,  in which Glover said Taylor was "hanging onto my money" for him, he claimed she had about $14,000 – and that he could walk into her home and find it.

"She had the eight I gave her the other day ... and she picked up another six," Glover told an unidentified man

Apparently she bailed Glover out of prison before, who she had dated in the past. They also had evidence, including phone conversations which stated Glover was hiding money with her.

She was interviewed about the homicide of Fernandez Bowman. Ms. Taylor rented the car he was found in. She was dating the victim’s brother’s drug-dealing associate, Jamarcus Glover. The brother is Demarius Bowman.

Ms. Taylor posted a bond for Glover on two occasions. Glover was believed to be involved in very violent crime in the area. Glover was committing crimes in a car registered to Breonna Taylor.

People calling from jail called her phone number 48 times from January 1, 2016, to January 3, 2020. Glover called her 26 times and another felon with drug possession charges, Curtis Palm, called her 7 times.

The Glover car was at Taylor’s house 6 times. It had been tracked numerous times to trap houses but the car was hard to surveil because Glover performed “heat checks.” The detectives had a GPS put on the car. They found that he left her house with USPS packages.

They also discovered that Glover had ties to the narcotics trafficking in Mississippi where he once lived.

They observed Ms. Taylor on February 13th of this year drive Glover to a trap house and wait for him. At one point, she got out of the car in front of one of the trap houses and looked around. Glover got in the car a short while later. They found a large amount of drugs hidden out in back of that property. They also found illicit firearms.

They also found an LG&E bill with Adrian Walker’s name on it.

By February 20th, Glover was using Taylor’s address.

A search warrant was executed in March for Breonna Taylor, and the address. Kenneth Walker was now living at the address.

Wow looks like I did get some facts wrong. It wasnt Her current boyfriends fault at all. Well except for the part where he opened fire on police. That was kind of his fault.

ya your explanation makes alot more sense.

@Daveyhavok832 So you think the polilce went in to murder HER but not her boyfriend and because he had no ties to drug dealing? They just did it because WHY? Why? let me guess, he was black. But wait!?!? Why didnt they kill him?

@Daveyhavok832 You mean the guy who shot at police and was later arrested for Cocaine trafficking. You mean the guy who the search warrant was intended for? YA thats what we call a credible witness.....

@Daveyhavok832 lets see, Police officers had a warrant to search the apartment. Her boyfriend was a suspected cocaine dealer and his listed home address was hers. (which later turned out to be true, he was arrested for cocaine trafficking) her boyfriend fired at the police first. They returned fire and accidently killed Breonna Taylor. Thats why nobody got arrested.

@Kurt Mattox if you want to maintain a childlike understanding of a very simple word in an attempt to uphold some bullshit definition that is purposefully twisted to shield those in power, I can’t stop you. No sense in arguing with a victim of brainwashing. Regardless of what happened after Breonna Taylor’s murder, the atrocity was witnessed by everyone in that house. Their involvement in it does not mean that they are not witnesses, except perhaps in a court of law. Even then, that is a severely flawed argument. When someone sees something happen, they are a witness. Period.

Now, you mentioned the neighbors that have all said the police did not announce themselves. These people are witnesses.  You will try to convolute things by saying that they only heard but didn’t see. Hence the term “eyewitness.” People are smart. So people came up with different words for similar things. If I say a bench with a blindfold on and the person next to me had an argument with his father and his father murdered him on the spot, am I not a witness to the murder having only heard it? Of course not.

@Daveyhavok832 Him shooting at police upon their entry does not categorize him as a witness since he is directly involved in the incident itself. There were no witnesses

@Kurt Mattox was her boyfriend not in the house at the time? He is a witness to her murder no matter how hard the police attempt to discredit him to save their own asses.

@Daveyhavok832 what witnesses? People who claim they heard/didn’t hear the police announce themselves? I don’t think that counts as being a witness to the shooting.

@Typical Yugosuavian well Bigo Bear, that's because I have a foul fucking mouth and somehow Jesus loves me anyway, and you as well for that matter.

@Liz C ironic how you put a swear in the middle of a holy word

@Daveyhavok832 I mean he does kinda have a point, people aren’t just gonna “forget” that he shot the other person. No matter how much you twist the story there’s not gonna be much room for reason.

Without the CCTV there wouldn’t have been sufficient evidence to prove what actually happened. He would have walked away a free man. Witnesses aren’t as reliable and affective as you’d like to think in cases like this.

@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ shutup

@Jessica Rich your point being? There were witnesses in Breonna Taylor’s murder and nobody got arrested.

@Daveyhavok832 doubt it. There were witnesses.

@Daveyhavok832 probably. Pretty disgusting how biases show up without video evidence.

Scatmanfan45 they’d be giving him a medal and a parade


It baffles me how little understanding he had of the severity of his situation, it seems like he thought that he would walk out of there and be celebrated as a hero

@Shiloh Wehrmacht I’ve seen it and done it before as well, but I don’t think it would have been so easy in this case. I would have encouraged him to take a plea, but, if I recall correctly, Drejka wasn’t offered one.

@gabrielle roberts thats a mostly fair argumemt but Ive seen good lawyers get all evidence the other side thrown out by questioning officers and getting one link in the evidenciary chain to be labeled questionable then damnable

@Shiloh Wehrmacht Also, if the defense accidentally opens the door for prosecutors (claiming Drejka was just an easy going guy trying to “better society,” as they did) to bring forth character witnesses as well as those who’d been confronted by Drejka in a particularly hostile manner, the judge would have no choice but to let that evidence against him in.

@Shiloh Wehrmacht They could argue that it’s prejudicial, but since he’d confronted at least one other person at that store over that same space AND threatened to shoot him, that would likely be allowed in and would directly show a pattern of behavior that preceded the fatal shooting. Drejka was a ticking time bomb. Unfortunately for this young father, Drejka finally thought he was justified to use lethal force. A jury of his peers disagreed, thankfully.

@gabrielle roberts any good attorney would ensure none of those prior incidents could be brought up during the trial (its prejudicial evidence not directly relevant to the case and doesnt directly show his state of mind either)

@Shiloh Wehrmacht Absolutely not, not only given the circumstances of this case, but all relevant past encounters he’s had on the road or in parking lots. As the narrator pointed out, Drejka had pulled this same gun on two men and two women (one with children in her vehicle) on four separate occasions, prior to killing this young father. He was itching to use it.

@Makima Tier 3 Sub I wouldn’t say he caused it. Drejka parked illegally to go confront someone else about being in an handicapped space unnecessarily. THAT’S what caused this. Who gets in a screaming match with someone over a parking space (that he didn’t need himself, mind you) when simply telling them, “hey, you shouldn’t do that if you don’t need this spot” then moving along would suffice? I’m not enabling the victim here… he’s dead. I’m placing blame on the one that TOOK A LIFE over a shove.

@gabrielle roberts actually any good lawyer could have gotten him off

@Makima Tier 3 Sub And would you have stabbed this man as he was backing away from you after you produced whatever weapon you’d be carrying? Or would you realize the threat had passed? And no, a good lawyer wouldn’t have gotten him off. He screwed up because he’s BEEN wanting to use his gun and jumped at the opportunity to fire at someone that was retreating. He was going to prison whether he had the best lawyer in the country or not.

@gabrielle roberts No i won’t be fine with that but at the same time i ain’t letting anybody touch me and getaway with it scotfree either. Now where i live we don’t carry guns like in america but some of us keep knives on us just incase for instances like this. Nobody should be allowed to get their hands on anyone else no matter what reason. I’m not siding with the guy in the video either because he is obviously very dumb for not getting a good lawyer for this

@Makima Tier 3 Sub He pushed him to put distance between his family and a strange man yelling at them. Would you be fine with some strange man screaming at your wife and children? <br>A gunshot is not an equal response to a shove. He hesitated and waited until the deceased was BACKING AWAY FROM HIM (meaning he was no longer a threat) when he pulled the trigger. That’s why he’s in prison today.

@Makima Tier 3 Sub He pushed him to put distance between his family and a strange man yelling at them. Would you be fine with some strange man screaming at your wife and children?
A gunshot is not an equal response to a shove. He hesitated and waited until the deceased was BACKING AWAY FROM HIM (meaning he was no longer a threat) when he pulled the trigger. That’s why he’s in prison today.

@gabrielle roberts But that guy put his hands on him first tho

also before someone calls me stupid, that was sarcasm

i wonder whyyyyyyy he thought that? thats SO strange

i wonder whyyyyyyy he thought that? thats SO strange

@Cesare Cesare hey republican, could you give me the freedom of being able to understand the fuck you said?

He probably still is hailed as a hero to his like minded friends and family and would be to all of America if it weren't for the video cameras that caught it.

@RLTW ok since he refuses to return and explain himself wtf did the guy hes responding to mean

George Zimmerman was portrayed as a hero by conservative media, so I guess he thought he would be too

@Don't watch CNN ! Fake News ! Nah, he’d still be in prison.

@Cesare Cesare wtf are you trying to convey? Use English man

@Enrico Pallazzo Are you not listening to JCS & the interrogation?  Sheesh!

Ever since Trayvon martin these clowns got real confident.

@Enrico Pallazzo He murdered a man that was backing away from him.

He DID walk out like a hero that day, only protests brought charges had there been no video he'd be free today.

@Shay Love so he doesn't have privileges??? Haha dude look up the definition of a privilege.

@Ruben Leavell wrong, the only reason privilege didn't save him this time because the video told  the true story.

@Shay Love if he had privileges then he would have been saved no? I don't think you grasp what a privilege is.

He thought that privilege was going to save him.

He thought that privilege was going to save him.

Fox News was celebrating him as a hero so there’s that

@electrojones lmaooo 😂😂 u got other people triggered too 💀

Unfortunately a lot of people who conceal carry think they would be celebrated in this situation

Yt Sup. Don't feel very superior in jail I'm sure ehehhhahhaa

If this took place in 1949 there would have been a parade in his honor 😂


What a character lol, this guy is talking to the police like he’s part of the team smh

What a character lol, this guy is talking to the police like he’s part of the team smh

@Gabriel T Yes, a confident, experienced gun owner.  A wannabe cop for sure, but my point remains the same.  There are 300 million guns in America owned by over 100 million law-abiding gun owners including me.  Get use to it.

@clara Good choice. You're vastly overmatched.

@clara Good choice. You're vastly overmatched.

@Acedman190 Bro, it's very simple:  because the criminal justice system has become politicized and controlled by the angry, afrocentric left so jurors are afraid of retaliation and local government officials are afraid of leftard rioting and looting in the streets. That's why.

@Sabrason bro if it was justified why tf was he found guilty?

@Sabrason bro if it was justified why tf was he found guilty?

@yerro "clearly what I think is true"

Lol. Omg I can't stop laughing at that ridiculous statement

@yerro "clearly what I think is true"

Lol. Omg I can't stop laughing at that ridiculous statement

@LJ B also, I live in America currently lmao. I don't want to consider myself an American tho cuz of people like you

@LJ B clearly what I think is true, if there's people as entitled as you who think people should be allowed to carry weapons that can kill in an instant.

I'd say that him getting convicted for this would set precedent that this wasn't in the scope of SYG law. But. What do I know.

@Sabrason two and a half seconds is not a “split second” Drejka had sufficient time to make a reasonable decision….gotta love how defendants choose to wear glasses in court…..must think it gives them credibility…….ha ha ha ha……only in America can you be killed over a car park infringement!

@Sabrason you intelligent, Sabrason?  Haha…you are delusional….

@Sabrason you intelligent, Sabrason?  Haha…you are delusional….

@Sabrason WTF……….”a confident, experienced and law abiding gun owner”….are you serious??  He was a gun owner, he had a responsibility to avoid confrontations including any other situation which might require him to use his gun. Everyone around him warned him about his unacceptable behaviour. He was told to stop confronting and harassing people. So what does he do? He decides to carry his gun next time he harasses people. This guy is dumb! He went out of his way to confront the lady. This is not an isolated incident. Others testified in court that Drejka made threats to use his gun and kill. He should not have been given a concealed weapon permit. Like the judge said “believe your eyes” he lied to the police, not realising the entire incident was on cctv. He deserves to rot in prison. He shot and killed a man over a car parking incident….seriously…is that was America is reduced to….killing each other over a car park! He did not have either the right or the authority to confront and harass people over a car parking infringement. He most likely stalked the car park, waiting for his victim. This guy most likely has mental health issues. No one in their right mind would get involved in this situation. The judge summed it up perfectly, Drejka is a wannabe cop. Smile Drejka, you are on candid camera…..haha

@yerro oh look.. another non American passing judgement on American law and firearms like anyone cares what you think!

@clara That's what I thought, Clara...and nobody is arguing here...we're all just chatting and discussing differing opinions but, like many in here, your parents did a horrendous job raising you so you can't handle a differing opinion calmly and either get triggered into rage or you refuse to communicate and run away.  I get it.

@Zak Potato Because you can't, my logic is undeniable so you've reached the end of any weak attempt you made to argue against it.  SYG law is SYG law.

@Sabrason ANTI WHITE??? AFROCENTRIC??? BYEEE i am not arguing with you again it is clear that you have issues and that is not my problem goodbye

@Sabrason I don't really remember exactly what Twain said about the idiot, but all I know is that I'm not gonna waste my time in a yt chat fight.

2 things come to mind: (1) Boomer (2) Privileged

2 things come to mind: (1) Boomer (2) Privileged

@Ítalo Brito I realize that.  I'm far too intelligent for you to understand the basic concepts that I'm explaining in clear and thoughtful detail.

@MarvNoGood I'd say if the judge didn't want to punish him for being a wannabe parking lot cop and if the jury wasn't afraid of retaliation and violence in the streets had they found him innocent he wouldn't be in prison right now.  It was another anti-white racially-motivated injustice.

@Jeff Au_blum Well, you have a right to disagree with the SYG law but being violently "shoved" to the ground injuring an arm would make most reasonable/rational people fear further bodily harm which justifies deadly force = SYG.  It's that simple.  Let's be clear that McGlockton started the physical altercation and committed the first illegal act by laying hands on Drejka and nobody has a right to get physical b/c of a verbal confrontation...NOBODY.  LOL...Drejka "had a pretty long time" to realize that an aggressive/hostile drug addict with a history of assault wasn't going to attack him AGAIN???......what do you call a long time???  He had maybe 1-2 seconds to make a decision while McGlockton was repositioning to do god knows what else in that instant.  He could've been retreating, getting ready to attack again, pull his own firearm or other weapon...no way for Drejka or anybody else to know in that quick instant.  That's why it was a justified shooting per legal experts.

@clara Clara, you're not getting it because you don't understand the SYG law.  In danger of death is NOT the only circumstance that the law allows deadly force to be used for.  It's also imminent bodily harm (look it up and keep reading it) which Drejka was reasonably in fear of since he was ALREADY harmed once by McGlockton.  That's why the legal experts agree that it was a justified shooting.  Somebody violently pushes you off your feet out of nowhere most normal people would fear further bodily harm which is a reasonable and rational fear in that situation.  Some of you seem to want to the shoot messenger when in reality you just don't agree with the SYG law and apparently want victims to remain defenseless after being assaulted.

A lot of these self designated "Neighborhood Watch" fantasy policemen waiting to murder someone

A lot of these self designated "Neighborhood Watch" fantasy policemen waiting to murder someone

@Sabrason im sorry but no. He was simply shoved not punched, stabbed or held by the throat he was shoved theres no reason anyone should be pulling a weapon on a person that simply shoved them and didnt keep going towards them especially since he was the one that started the altercation. And mister trigger happy also had a pretty long time to realize that the “agressor” wasnt really trying to attack him anymore

@Sabrason how is getting pushed to the ground a deadly force? this man was NEVER in danger of death and you can see that clearly in the tapes. you assume you’re the only one who knows the law and everyone else is stupid, but the truth is that you’re grasping at straws and not even reading people’s answers because you’re trying to cover up your own idiocy. there’s a reason drejka is in prison! i don’t see how a youtube comment from someone who can’t find anything better to do with their life than pretend law in youtube comments is going to change that.

@Lobo Lara Yes, yes it does and if you understood the SYG law you would know that.  "Possibly getting beat because you were an asshole justifies a kill? = fear of imminent bodily harm = justifies lethal force.  Certainly no "free license to kill" but it is a license to defend oneself from imminent bodily harm or fear of death which is perfectly legitimate and justified.  Innocent citizens should not be defenseless victims to criminals with no legal ability to defend themselves by whatever means necessary.

@Painted Collection I have no need to read the entirety of your nonsense b/c I don't agree with your false premise that Drejka KNEW in a split second of time that McGlockton was "retreating."

@Sabrason - That turn around might have worked if I had been trying to claim people weren’t outraged by a white dude killing a black dude. They were outraged by it. So what? That doesn’t make RoboCop wannabe any less guilty of shooting a man who was retreating away from him. Anyone who is that that jumpy shouldn’t carry.

But I’ll entertain your silly game one last time. A black guy starts screaming at a white woman for parking in a handicap spot. Her white husband comes out and shoves the black man away from her. Black man pulls a gun, the white man starts to retreat but black man shoots anyway and the white man dies in front of his children. You think the black shooter wouldn’t have been charged? You think the black shooter wouldn’t have gone to prison? Not only would the black shooter have gone to prison but he would have deserved it. I get the feeling you wouldn’t be over here crying about the injustice of it all had the races been reversed but I hope I’m wrong. Either way, I think I’ve had my share of entertaining your delusional confirmation bias. Cheers bud.

@Sabrason Whaaaa?! A convict’s defense team says they’re innocent?! Holy crow! That’s certainly a new one. That means there’s a whoooole lot of people who should be set free right away. We should let someone know. But wait... what about all the legal expects who say Drejka WASN’T justified in his actions? Hmmm. Guess we’ll just pretend they don’t exist. Makes sense to me. You’re a genius!

@Painted Collection I'm certainly no expert (although still A LOT brighter than you) but, again, per the defense team, there' are legal experts around the country who agree that is was a justified use of SYG so all of you amateur armchair attorneys should consider some self-reflection as to why you disagree with those experts when the SYG law is quite clear.  You're free to contact any one of those experts including Drejka's defense attorneys and I'm sure they'd be happy to explain it to you also.

@Sabrason Pal, McG obviously retreated after he saw the gun, never reached towards his pocket or any place he could've held the weapon. He was backing the f away from that situation sooo, no, no way the shooting was justified. These are clear facts you can see from the recording, no matter how much you try to twist the situation.

@Sabrason "Like every other anti-white racist in here with an afrocentric agenda, you have  little if any understanding of the SYG law"<br>You are showing zero integrity for discourse with speak like that. It makes your bias and views see-through, especially after laying out several chapters of pseudo facts which only you find convincing.

@Sabrason "Like every other anti-white racist in here with an afrocentric agenda, you have  little if any understanding of the SYG law"
You are showing zero integrity for discourse with speak like that. It makes your bias and views see-through, especially after laying out several chapters of pseudo facts which only you find convincing.

Every time he uses what he perceives to be police terminology or jargon I want to cut my ears off.

@Sabrason - Aw shucks. Egg on my face, man. I’m so sorry. I didn’t realize I was talking to an expert. I hear Drejka is looking to appeal. You should offer your expert legal services. He’ll be free in no time.

@Painted Collection thank you for writing this out for @sabrason and possibly saving his life/someone else’s life.

@Sabrason  your bias is clouding your reading comprehension and you’re judgement.

@Sabrason  your bias is clouding your reading comprehension and you’re judgement.

@Sabrason Nah, I dont agree. That shit wasnt right whatsoever.

@Sabrason Nah, I dont agree. That shit wasnt right whatsoever.

@Sabrason Lol, is there Internet in prison, Mr. Dreyka?

@Sabrason Lol, is there Internet in prison, Mr. Dreyka?

@Sabrason by that logic, you can’t go around antagonizing/yelling at people and playing vigilante just because people parked in the wrong spot. McGlockton could have argued that he had no way of knowing if Drejka was going to cause the mother of his children bodily harm as the man aggressively yells at her over a parking spot. I can’t stand able bodied people who park handicapped parking spots either but it’s not my job to correct that behavior. Report it to the property authority and move on with life.

Also, you’ve missed a very clear indicator that you’re not as law savvy as you’d like to believe. The SYG law states that you can meet force with force (including deadly force) if you REASONABLY feel your life is in danger. That’s the key word and that one word is why this man was arrested and later found guilty. By his own admission, he thought he would be kicked - not killed. Kicked. And if he thought the kick was enough to have killed him then he would have phrased it that way. Given how forthcoming Drejka was with proving justification for his actions, if he genuinely mistook McGlockton pivoting to leave for reaching for his own gun then he would have said as much. Not once did he say he feared McGlockton had a gun despite the officers continuously providing him with the opportunity to do so.

@MarvNoGood Your comment proves what a dunce you are.  Drekja didn't think he was in danger BEFORE the attack, he reasonably believed he was in danger AFTER the attack -- as any reasonable person would after being violently shoved to the ground and injured like he was -- which justified lethal force with a gun particularly since McGlockton continued towards him for 2-3 steps AFTER the push and only slightly turned to the right once the gun was pulled but said nothing.  You call that slight partial turn a "retreat" but I would argue that in that instant there was no way for Drejka to know if that was a half-hearted/reluctant "retreat" or if McGlockton was evading and repositioning to draw his own weapon so Drejka correctly fired ONE bullet to neutralize the threat and prevent further bodily harm to himself = clear cut, textbook SYG. Look it up. You are NOT required to wait for a violent aggressor to CONTINUE to inflict bodily harm more than once before you use lethal force.  This is not difficult to understand if you understand the SYG law which states that if you reasonably feel your life is in danger or bodily harm is imminent you can use lethal force. Period. End of discussion.   You say "you can't go around shooting people because you were shoved" but the SYG law says otherwise in certain instances and I'd add that you can't go around laying hands on people and violently pushing people to the ground and not expect a defensive response.  It's that simple.

@Sabrason you need to read over it again because Drekja did not even see the attack coming to believe he was in any kind of danger. When Drekja saw his attacker he was already on the ground pulling out his weapon and his attacker immediately retreated even before Drekja pulled his weapon. So how is it a justified shooting when he was no longer in danger? You can’t just go around shooting people because you were shoved

@MarvNoGood I mean, he could be experienced and delusional, that is a possibility

@MarvNoGood I mean, he could be experienced and delusional, that is a possibility

@Sabrason if he was experienced he would not be in prison right now

@Sabrason if he was experienced he would not be in prison right now

He is...a confident, experienced and law-abiding gun owner...I'm very proud that he used his gun in SYG self defense regardless of the injustice he was the victim of.

In his distorted mind, he thinks he is. He just has his “us” vs “them” mixed up.

In his distorted mind, he thinks he is. He just has his “us” vs “them” mixed up.

Exactly what I said! He is such a clown.

Exactly what I said! He is such a clown.


His whole argument was that there was a woman parked in a handicapped spot when she shouldn't have been.<br>So, in order to confront her, he parks ILLEGALLY next to her. Hypocrite

His whole argument was that there was a woman parked in a handicapped spot when she shouldn't have been.
So, in order to confront her, he parks ILLEGALLY next to her. Hypocrite

Yeah then he tells a cop without a lawyer present that it's his pet peev and that he takes " precautions " when confronting people !

@Mylesa Stinnette Exactly!
I agree with you 100%
We need more restrictions on guns for everyone's safety

@Buster Scruggs  No one thinks you’re funny.

hi thisthers I totally agree with you. I hate guns and in Florida, they carry them around like chapstick. Luckily where I live it’s against the law. The guy was definitely wrong for taking that man’s life. I am a black disabled woman and it’s highly irritating to see someone in a handicap parking spot who should not be there. The suspect had other choices. I have had cars ticketed and towed because of a spot I needed. I just think that in today’s crazy world with so many angry people in the US, the least you can do is not park in handicap spots. I am black and I find where I live that it’s always blacks that I encounter parking wrongfully. That’s all I am trying to say.

@Mylesa Stinnette The black man didn’t even park there. That was another woman.<br>And regardless of illegal parking, no one deserves to be shot at.

@Mylesa Stinnette The black man didn’t even park there. That was another woman.
And regardless of illegal parking, no one deserves to be shot at.

@Rundvelt Of course! Let’s justify him shooting at someone over parking!

Except that it wasn't illegal parking if it's private property.    :)

Handicapped spots are illegal by the law, parking in two spots, etc, isn't illegal on private property (and why you don't get a ticket from them).   For example, in a WalMart or a quick-e-mart.

@Stephanie yep, I'm the bozo on the cheese buss for sure.

@Simon Black I think you’re responding to the wrong person. I wasn’t asking you.

@Bendygedy and oh brother,  do you read like every third word out of a sentence?<br>I didn't say every country, I said most countries with a military.  Tell you what,  want to look like really bad if I give you the long list of countries that did?

@Bendygedy and oh brother,  do you read like every third word out of a sentence?
I didn't say every country, I said most countries with a military.  Tell you what,  want to look like really bad if I give you the long list of countries that did?

@Stephanie folks,  we have one of those special ones here.
FIRST OF ALL,  I WAS BORN AND RAISED IN THE ACTUAL WORLD,  NOT CYBER FLAKE LAND. THIS ISN'T ME SCREAMING,  I DO THIS FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE A HARD TIME FOCUSING ON WHAT THEY SAY, MUCH LESS ME.
WHAT DO I MEAN?
YOU NOW CLAIM YOU DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT GUNS BEING TAKEN AWAY .
BUT A FEW COMMENTS AGO?
"I DON'T THINK PEOPLE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO OWN AK47S.  IT WORKED OUT GOOD IN AUSTRALIA "
YOU MEAN WHERE THEY TOOK AWAY THE GUNS FROM PEOPLE?
oh brother.
Sigh...
When people can't keep track of what I say, I can understand that.
But when they don't bother to pay attention to their own words? I start scratching my head wondering why I bothered to listen.
WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU ASKING ME TO DEFINE AN ASSAULT RIFLE?
THERE'S NO SUCH THING?!?!
YOU ARE THE PERSON WHO USED THAT SILLY, CARTOON CHARACTER WORD.
TELL ME,  IF YOU SEE A RABBIT,  DO YOU THINK YOU'RE LOOKING AT BUGS BUNNY?

@hi thisthers Define assault rifle then.

@hi thisthers Define assault rifle then.

@Simon Black oh dear you are upset.
First of all I have a point of view, which if you don’t like is fine by me.
Second, you are allowed guns,and I didn’t say they should be taken away.
Third, I don’t see the problem in making people safer in the use of firearms, through education, and the need to address any problems by people who are a bit unhinged. Or stupid for that matter!
Fourth you can spot the stupid and the unhinged by the way they  highlight things in block capitals ,as if shouting.
Fifth , the government here doesn’t execute anybody. And we don’t carry guns.
Sixth 🇬🇧

@hi thisthers I'll answer your question.  Then answer mine.
My point is,  too many people have a point of view about the 2nd amendment,  but their point of view has no factual information,  and that is dangerous.
I can, and already have elaborated on that.
QUESTION: Can you provide a definition of assault rifle,  or admit that you didn't understand the phrase in the first place?

@hi thisthers I never understood why people think they know what another person's emotional state is. Why is that even part of your comments? <br>Okay,  the original comment comes from that "Benygendy" person who claims the 2nd amendment is out dated.  Then, YOU , yes, YOU replied by stating there should be restrictions, and people don't need AK47S.  you said that.  I'm responding to that.

@hi thisthers I never understood why people think they know what another person's emotional state is. Why is that even part of your comments?
Okay,  the original comment comes from that "Benygendy" person who claims the 2nd amendment is out dated.  Then, YOU , yes, YOU replied by stating there should be restrictions, and people don't need AK47S.  you said that.  I'm responding to that.

@Simon Black I think that you're responding to the wrong person.<br>You're getting worked up over nothing.

@Simon Black I think that you're responding to the wrong person.
You're getting worked up over nothing.

@Simon Black If you do not know what an assault rifle is, then I can't participate in this conversation with you.

@Sheila Hammond how I feel about the loss of a life,  is irrelevant about my 2nd amendment right. I think it was Fort Henry? An entire fleet of British ships had their cannons and weapons trained on the American flag.  The British Admiral commanded the troops (Americans soldiers) take down that flag,  or we will obliterate it. Our boys refused. For hours into the night,  they fired on Fort Henry and the flag.  At times it would disappear in the smoke,  reappear standing,  but on an angle.  The flag stayed up all night. In the morning,  it became visible why the flag couldn't be shot down.  Because every time it was, another soldier came out to hold that flag up. The pile of dead soldiers is why the flag couldn't be shot down.  I  get choked up every time I think about that.  I  can never repay those brave men. But I will be damned if I don't fight for what they stood for.  Freedom is everyone's job, responsibility. Not just some guy 250 years ago.

@hi thisthers this is why having views about something without information is dangerous. <br>Please,  I beg you,  define assault weapon.

@hi thisthers this is why having views about something without information is dangerous.
Please,  I beg you,  define assault weapon.

@Sheila Hammond perhaps you should read your own comment.

@Simon Black I don't believe I brought race into it! The shooter very well may have been a racist. One thing is for sure, that being pushed doesn't warrant murder or manslaughter. That man was deranged. I feel so sorry for all the victims loved ones. His wife, his children, his family and friends, and him for losing his life.

@Simon Black I can't remember. I commented a month ago.<br>But, I do believe that assault rifles are not necessary for regular citizens.

@Simon Black I can't remember. I commented a month ago.
But, I do believe that assault rifles are not necessary for regular citizens.

@hi thisthers okay,  the guy before you made the religious comment,  and you talked about Australia,  yes?

@hi thisthers I might owe you an apology.

@hi thisthers I might owe you an apology.

@hi thisthers I was certain it was you who stated earlier that you so no reason to allow Citizens firearms such Ak47s  and also,  am I confusing you with a different person,  or did you make a comment about people who hold the 2nd amendment sacred treat it almost like a religion?

@Simon Black I have no clue what you’re talking about.

Well if you take the spot without a permit and refuse to move im likely to park behind you and than you can wait to leave.

@Sheila Hammond<br>But would he be pushed over if he was black though?

@Sheila Hammond
But would he be pushed over if he was black though?

@Bendygedy 100%
You should be required training even if you know how to handle a weapon.
There should also be restrictions on what weapons a normal citizen is able to have.
There's no need for us to have AK-47's for self-defense.
In Australia, they have guns. But they do extensive research and background checks on the purchaser and take many other precautions.
And guess what, there are no school shootings over there even though they have guns.

I do feel that the gun laws in the United States, are so out dated. <br>I know the second amendment is like a religious deity to some Americans, but the intellect and training needed to responsibly own a firearm is seldom attained. And as we know there are far too many deaths because ordinary citizens use their firearms without assessing the situation and drawing on adequate professional training!

I do feel that the gun laws in the United States, are so out dated.
I know the second amendment is like a religious deity to some Americans, but the intellect and training needed to responsibly own a firearm is seldom attained. And as we know there are far too many deaths because ordinary citizens use their firearms without assessing the situation and drawing on adequate professional training!

If that was all he did, he wouldn't be getting interrogated. He thinks he's a normal, average guy?! Thank God he is not. He most definitely is racist, in my opinion, but whether his hatred stems from that, or not, this man should not be freed. The man who was shot, did not deal with the situation very well, but he wasn't pointing a gun at the defendant!

@Peter Brown comparing a murderer to a authorised police officer, are we? 😐

@Peter Brown Police are trained and employed to determine and use the best strategy and also reasonable responses. They wouldn't park illegally to confront someone, who was causing no danger to the public or herself


"Neutralize eminent threat" is he in a fucking action movie or something? xD


“Is there anything you would change about that day?”
“Not off the top of my head”

Guess it was a pretty good day for him then

@atheistmecca Clearly. The point is that even if it was self defense, he's clearly fine with having a man's death on his hands. It also makes it even more difficult to believe that he thought his life was actually in danger because if he did, you would at least expect that he would regret letting himself end up in that position. I think this all makes it pretty clear that he had been wanting a chance to shoot and kill someone for awhile and legit thought this was his chance to get away with it.

Could have gone with “not confronting a family that wasn’t doing anything to me personally”

@Soleilune Doesn't matter what should happen. He's not going to sit up there and confess to fucking up before the trial. Nobody would, that would be fucking stupid.

@lucid hominid It most definitely wasn't self defense.

@Jordan Martin That's not what manslaughter and murder are. Manslaughter is killing someone intentionally and unjustly without thinking about it beforehand. Murder is carrying out a plan to kill someone.

@wesb2410 Not sure why that would even be a thought. The obvious answer for someone who had to kill in self defense and isnt a psychopath  is "I would change whatever I could so that a man didn't have to die."

@wesb2410 you can’t prove that his intent was to kill. Nobody could, that’s why he was charged with manslaughter and not murder.

@Guy Owl Sure but that's a bit hard to defend if you so obviously shot someone with the intent to kill though.

@wesb2410  You are as wrong about the concept of self-defence as the murderer in this video. There should be no doubt in any sane mind that it was a mistake to shoot him. The jury is not there to determine if it was "good to shoot him" as it is obvious to everyone on court that it was a mistake- the man bleeded to death in front of his children over a parking lot argument... The only question is if he was threatened enough to justify his mistake of shooting him. To regret the loss of life would only do him good.

@wesb2410 he could just say I wish no one died

I mean saying "yes I wouldn't have shot him" would have been an exceptionally bad choice for him, because it would essentially have him admit that shooting was a mistake and that he should be punished.

“I’ve had lots of time to think” “no not off the top of my head”

i think hes afraid of being misunderstood and smeared

I mean, in the end, she did move her car.<br>Mission accomplished....?

I mean, in the end, she did move her car.
Mission accomplished....?


Everyone who ever met this guy must have chills running up their spine.. knowing that this guy was on a hair trigger everyday of his life

Lots of people are like that, unfortunately, looking for any reason to start possible argument. I will park on a regular spot today for sure.

I've known people like this who just snapped one day, it's scary.


this guy pisses me off. hopefully he rots in prison.

@Herbert West thank you for informing me. glad karma caught up to him.


As someone who is actually disabled, and has the right to use disabled parking, and who rarely does so, I too have a pet peeve with people using disabled parking.
     However, first off, I am not a parking enforcement officer, and two, I sometimes forget to put my placard on the mirror. I am an amputee and only use disabled parking if I can't use my prosthesis or I am hurting that day. It blocks my view so I have to take it down to drive.
     Unless it's your job to enforce the law, don't. Call the police, take a picture of the violator and pass it to the police, but don't confront people.
     People who use disabled parking illegally are entitles assholes. You are very likely to find yourself in a fight. It's a very petty thing to get in a fight about.
     Even if you know you can hold your own in a fight, the other party could be armed or just a better fighter than you are.
    No one is going to think you a hero for telling off assholes.

@Daniel G Was it this guys job to enforce parking laws? No, it was not.
      He stated that he had the gun as an "equalizer" for exactly these sorts of situations.
      Did I say he had every right to push him down? I don't think he did, so I doubt I said it, unless I was quoting some other person.
     In the end, this guy had no right to shoot the man who pushed him.
      If you walk around shouting at people, you are going to get hit sooner or later, regardless if it is right or wrong.

@Eric Taylor Marquis came out and was the first to be violent. That makes him the aggressor.

@Eric Taylor Marquis came out and was the first to be violent. That makes him the aggressor.

@Tasha Vladimiroff As someone who is disabled, I understand.<br>      Better to put wood screws under their tires than to confront them.

@Tasha Vladimiroff As someone who is disabled, I understand.
      Better to put wood screws under their tires than to confront them.

@Eric Taylor i cant say either party was justified in their actions. i can only speculate on motive

@Eric Taylor i cant say either party was justified in their actions. i can only speculate on motive

@SkeletalSounds _ But was he justified in doing so? Did that action defuse the situation, or did it escalate the situation?

He was physical and confrontational in his approach toward a car filled with a family. <br>Marquis pushed him in order to diffuse this confrontation out of concern for his family’s well being

He was physical and confrontational in his approach toward a car filled with a family.
Marquis pushed him in order to diffuse this confrontation out of concern for his family’s well being

@I R What is wrong with you?<br>      I'm not going to reply if you are not even going to bother reading my responses.

@I R What is wrong with you?
      I'm not going to reply if you are not even going to bother reading my responses.

@Eric Taylor I did and found them to be unreasonable.
"He who begins, a quarrel or dispute, either by threatening or striking another. No man may strike another because he has threatened, or in consequence of the use of any words."

Either by threatening or striking.

There is definitive evidence that he did not strike the vehicle's occupant and it is also impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he threatened the occupant.

@I R Did you bother reading my comment?
      I said the pusher could argue he was defending his family. I didn't say he was right to push the guy down.
      However, yelling at someone DOES aromatically make you the aggressor.
     Imagine you accidentally rear end someone in traffic.
    The other driver gets out and starts screaming at you. Would you say that other driver is being aggressive? Would you feel safe staying in that situation? Would you be justified in leaving the scene of the accident?
     This guy wasn't just arguing. He was yelling at the driver.

@I R Did you bother reading my comment?
      I said the pusher could argue he was defending his family. I didn't say he was right to push the guy down.
      However, yelling at someone *DOES* aromatically make you the aggressor.
     Imagine you accidentally rear end someone in traffic.
    The other driver gets out and starts screaming at you. Would you say that other driver is being aggressive? Would you feel safe staying in that situation? Would you be justified in leaving the scene of the accident?
     This guy wasn't just arguing. He was yelling at the driver.

@Eric Taylor How was he the initial aggressor when he only verbally argued, until being assaulted by the person coming out of the store? Being an asshole doesn't automatically make you the aggressor.

@I R Putting your hands on anyone in an unwelcome way is assault.
       However, in that case, he could have argued he was defending his family against an aggressor.
      In this case, I'm not sure he would have been successful.
        The reason the shooter's self deference argument failed was HE WAS THE AGGRESSOR

@I R Putting your hands on anyone in an unwelcome way is assault.
       However, in that case, he could have argued he was defending his family against an aggressor.
      In this case, I'm not sure he would have been successful.
        The reason the shooter's self deference argument failed was *HE WAS THE AGGRESSOR*

@Eric Taylor Pushing someone is assault. He would've been charged too if he didn't die.

@Eric Taylor Pushing someone is assault. He would've been charged too if he didn't die.

@Maryflor Frias How is Fairfield these days. I've been living in Oregon for 15 years.
     There are several celebrities from Fairfield, including some who went to my high school (Fairfield High).
     When I was their there was only 2 highs schools. Armijo and Fairfield. Now I think there are 5.

@Eric Taylor yeah I was just making sure we were talking about the same Fairfield... not many people r from here

“A Wise man told me don’t argue with fools cause people from a distance can’t tell who is who.”

“A Wise man told me don’t argue with fools cause people from a distance can’t tell who is who.”

@T3ddySpaghetti To kill over a parking violation is just stupid.
     Also, not all disabilities are visible.
     I walk into the store to get an electric cart for my elderly neighbor to use, then I put it back after she is done shopping.
   If anyone ever asks, I just explain what I'm doing. It's never a problem.

There was a case in the UK where a lady and her husband parked in a disabled bay of a supermarket. They had gone inside but forgotten their bags? and so the husband had came back out to get them from the car. While at the car he was verbally attacked by a male in a vehicle in the parking lot. The male accused the husband of not being disabled or needing the blue badge (needed to park in a disabled bay). He continued to attack the husband and then got out the car and punched the husband killing him. Whilst in custody the male was questioned and he alluded to the catalyst of the argument being that the husband didn't have the right to park there because he had no visible disabilities, then the police informed him that he was in fact shopping with his wife and that it was her that was disabled. It was all captured on CCTV and the interview too, all available to watch online. I think it's called 'One punch kill' or something along those lines. A tragic lesson of minding your own business

I lost my right leg in 2014 at age 26 so I understand and agree with you

I lost my right leg in 2014 at age 26 so I understand and agree with you

@Maryflor Frias Not exactly "next to" but close enough.

@Maryflor Frias Not exactly "next to" but close enough.

@Eric Taylor Fairfield, CA? Next to Napa?

@Eric Taylor Fairfield, CA? Next to Napa?

@Google User And what part of my comment makes you think I don't agree with that?<br>     Besides the "It is what it is" comment, yes, both of these guys were wrong. But this guy was looking for a situation where he could have the opportunity to shoot someone. This is why he was convicted of murder.

@Google User And what part of my comment makes you think I don't agree with that?
     Besides the "It is what it is" comment, yes, both of these guys were wrong. But this guy was looking for a situation where he could have the opportunity to shoot someone. This is why he was convicted of murder.

@Eric Taylor Listen man, you really need to let this go and admit that "it is what it is". Both of these idiots are clearly in the wrong on ALL of their actions which have lead to their now "really bad" out comes...like i said before. Two wrongs don't make a right. Neither one of them were "right" in their own actions...PERIOD! Smh

@Google User Well, I think Marquis had the right to defend his family, and his over aggressive attitude got him killed, had he survived, would he have been charged with assault?
      Is the murder charge against Drejka appropriate?
     I think it should be yes to both questions.

@Eric Taylor Yes, while I agree that Drejka was definitely "trigger happy" and being very aggressive with his belief. Marquis acting like a "thug" with violent (which escalated the bad situation real quick) then, he's going to be met with violent in returned.  Both are at equal FAULTS and should've choose better...be better as human beings. Neither of these idiots were ever "right" in their own reactions or caused.

@Google User I do agree, but for the "Educated and reasonable people DO NOT use violent to resolve situations in life"
      I would drop the "educated" part of the statement.
      You can be uneducated and responsible, while an educated person can be irresponsible and a hot head.

      I am not "officially" educated (I have no degree) but I still know things and I consider myself fairly responsible.
      At the same time you have a guy like Trump, who is said to be educated and he does have a degree, but he is still ignorant and irresponsible.
       I agree that Marquis should have got in the guy's face before pushing him, but he was not the aggressor, and he was backing off when the gun came out.
      You can't put yourself in this situation, then claim self deference.
    Even if you have a permit to carry, and the situation is 100% self deference, if you use your gun it will cost you at least $10000 because even if you are 100% justified you are going to get sued, and there will be an extensive investigation if a life is lost.
      This guy got a gun so he could have the confidence to be aggressive with others. He was looking for an excuse to use the gun.

I ABSOLUTELY agree with everything you said and only wished that Marquis hadn't resort to "pushing" someone when he could've easily just talked or asked Drejka "what's the problem" and not to scream at his wife with their kids present. Had Marquis not chosen violent over staying cool and calmly talking to Drejka while resolving the situation...Marquis could've gone home with his life and family that day...Smh

People who choose to deal everyday's problems with "violent" will always get more "violent problems" in return. Two wrongs WILL NEVER make a right! So, had these two hot headed idiots kept their "cool" on that day...they could've enjoy the rest of their lives with their loved ones. Such USELESS idiots & morons of the world...lol smh

Educated and reasonable people DO NOT use violent to resolve situations in life...
"Sometimes you have to be a lion so you can be a lamb that you really are" great saying from Dave Chappelle's mom to him as a teenager. Means a person has to learn to talk their point across strongly so they can live a life not involved in physicality.

And they had 3 kids, like if anyone was to use a handicap spot it would be them

And they had 3 kids, like if anyone was to use a handicap spot it would be them

more people need to write a paragraph like this way easier to read

more people need to write a paragraph like this way easier to read

@srcworm She wasn't by herself. She had her kids with her.

@srcworm She wasn't by herself. She had her kids with her.

C. J. Lau dude was screaming at a woman that was by herself. That’s pretty aggressive

C. J. Lau dude was screaming at a woman that was by herself. That’s pretty aggressive

I think there’s an app where people can send in pics of someone using a handicapped spot when they shouldn’t be, bc honestly cops don’t want to be bothered with that stuff, but also people need to not be using the spot if they don’t need it.

@ilaDali What case do you think I'm trying to make here?<br>      To be clear, my case here is, one should not confront others over minor things like this unless it's your job to do so.

@ilaDali What case do you think I'm trying to make here?
      To be clear, my case here is, one should not confront others over minor things like this unless it's your job to do so.

@anis sofea He carried a gun for the wrong reason. He carried a gun so he could have the confidence to confront others.<br>     He said as much in this video.

@anis sofea He carried a gun for the wrong reason. He carried a gun so he could have the confidence to confront others.
     He said as much in this video.

@C. J. Lau You clearly didn't read my comment properly, otherwise you would understand why I used "racist ideology"<br>     He was pushed down after verbally assaulting someone's wife. Are you telling me you would not attack someone who was attacking your wife?

@C. J. Lau You clearly didn't read my comment properly, otherwise you would understand why I used "racist ideology"
     He was pushed down after verbally assaulting someone's wife. Are you telling me you would not attack someone who was attacking your wife?

@The Human Journey You deserved to get a ticket, even though it was a mistake.
      Most people can be motivated to be careful not to do something like that by mistake. Others require more motivation.
     If you made a mistake, fine, pay the fine and be more careful next time.

@Scorpio83 I doubt it. Also, it is still illegal and rude to use a disabled space if you don't need it.

@Scorpio83 I doubt it. Also, it is still illegal and rude to use a disabled space if you don't need it.

I believe she did that because she was in the car. She probably would have moved if someone needed the space.

I believe she did that because she was in the car. She probably would have moved if someone needed the space.

@Eric Taylor you dont need to insert racist ideology into this situation.  And your plainly wrong when you say this man was the aggressor. He was pushed down after being physically dominated by a larger man. I disagree with this man being a busy body and confronting theses folks parked in the handicapped spot, nor do i condone him shooting the other man. But he clearly reacted. Wrongly to the other mans aggression.

@Eric Taylor .... I probably wrongly got out of your comment  , that it's not worth the misery to stand on your immediate rights , which might result in disaster. Both sides in this case blundered. It's obvious ofcourse Drejka is guilty of  (premeditated ) manslaughter.

@PaulLonden And how would you respond if you saw someone yelling at your wife?
      Is Marquis suppose to just bow down and say "Yes massa, whatever you say. I's just the dumb nigga here."?
      Marquis was not the aggressor, the white guy was the aggressor, and that is why he was convicted.
     He had EVERY right to push the guy down. In fact, had Marquis been armed and pulled his gun out to shoot the black guy, THAT would have been ruled self deference.
     I grant you, the lady was wrong parking in disabled parking, but that was a matter for parking enforcement. It's not even a traffic infraction.
    The guy was wrong to say anything at all.

@PaulLonden And how would you respond if you saw someone yelling at your wife?
      Is Marquis suppose to just bow down and say "Yes massa, whatever you say. I's just the dumb nigga here."?
      Marquis was not the aggressor, the white guy was the aggressor, and that is why he was convicted.
     He had *EVERY* right to push the guy down. In fact, had Marquis been armed and pulled his gun out to shoot the black guy, *THAT* would have been ruled self deference.
     I grant you, the lady was wrong parking in disabled parking, but that was a matter for parking enforcement. It's not even a traffic infraction.
    The guy was wrong to say anything at all.

i once was so exhausted after a 14 hour shift i parked unknowingly in a handicapped space, came out to.a police officer who questioned my morality and tried to shame me, and with my sincere response saying i had no idea he said yeah right and i got a ticket.

@Eric Taylor      Great comment .   It's just not worth the hassle . Marquis  should've learned to count till ten also though,  the way he immediately pushed Drejka to the ground , and kept towering over him.

Another  driver  saw Drejka going for a gun and ran while Marquis kept hanging around for over a second, which was an eternity in this situation ......2:23

*@Eric Taylor*      Great comment .   It's just not worth the hassle . Marquis  should've learned to count till ten also though,  the way he immediately pushed Drejka to the ground , and kept towering over him.
Another  driver  saw Drejka going for a gun and ran while Marquis kept hanging around for over a second, which was an eternity in this situation ......2:23

@Rex Arms Crypto i wouldnt doubt that, some people never learn

@Rex Arms Crypto i wouldnt doubt that, some people never learn

I bet the lady is still parking in handicapped spots

I bet the lady is still parking in handicapped spots

@jairtzinio I used to own a sporty little 4X4. I once parked in disabled parking because I wasn't wearing my leg. I got out, standing on one foot, but before I was able to grab my crutches this guy got in my face and started yelling at me.
   I just looked down and asked, "Isn't having just one foot considered a "disability?"
     This happened in Fairfield, by the way. But now I live in Oregon. I grew up in Fairfield.
     I have very steady balance on one foot, because I lost my leg when I was just 3 years old.

I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said, these kinds of incidents wouldn't be so common if people would just stop policing each other like this.

in San Francisco we have a problem with people breaking into apartment complexes and folks in the buildings feel the need to police instead of following what most apartments tell residents which is to report suspicious activities to police or security but they don't listen, then you have to hear about it in the news.


Why do ' Murcans need those curb things in parking lots? What function do they serve? What do they call them?


He had been involved in 4 other documented altercations. Guy was just looking for trouble and he found it. 20 years to think about it now.

@Todd Baker he's not in law enforcement. He thinks someone is breaking the law, he should call the law

@Oskar winters Sounds like your projecting your way of thinking.

clearly saw a black woman in the car and thought bingo!

@Lady Kdog 17 well if the "lady" was not breaking the law and taking advantage of the handicapped people of the community. He wouldn't of said anything at all. Just another person sick of seeing lawbreakers turn his community into 💩 nice victim blaming. As I recall the law breakers boyfriend came out with out saying a word and assaulted somebody. Great people

@Lady Kdog 17 I don't know it.  Just think that would be the fair thing to do

@siberwolf33 why dont you just share it with us

@Justin W true dat. Dont harrass women. Its wreckless, rude, unchivalrous etcetcetc

@John Jimbob In fear for life or bodily harm...

This guy doesn’t strike me as someone who does a lot of thinking to begin with so I doubt he’ll have come up with an insightful thought in the next 20 years...

@SPIDERM0OSE triggered from youtube comments PepeLaugh

@SPIDERM0OSE in what way was it life threatening for the shooter, and do u really think you can justify a killing through "he failed to show enough respect"? Hope you have a good time binge watching alex jones though

@siberwolf33 <br>Why would he do that when we live in a simple world where the designated perfect people wear white hats & get victimised by the evil bad guys who wear black hats.

@siberwolf33
Why would he do that when we live in a simple world where the designated perfect people wear white hats & get victimised by the evil bad guys who wear black hats.

Since you brought up Mr. Drejka's history I think you should also bring up Mr. McGlockton's.

@Justin W <br>Real life man. Respect is a two way street.

@Justin W
Real life man. Respect is a two way street.

@Mekon Headed Freak <br>Truth has a way of standing the test of time like that.

@Mekon Headed Freak
Truth has a way of standing the test of time like that.

@SPIDERM0OSE ye completely rational to shoot people when they push you, like geez, pushing ppl is the mist direct sign that they are probably going to kill you

I saw a man paralyzed from getting pushed...hit his head on a handrail. You can kill someone by pushing them in front of, off of, or <br>onto something.

I saw a man paralyzed from getting pushed...hit his head on a handrail. You can kill someone by pushing them in front of, off of, or
onto something.

He’s sitting in prison right now thinking he did nothing wrong and was railroaded by an anti-white male society. He’ll get out with the same sociopath attitude.

Zachk he got 20 though. Probably be let out in 10 at the earliest.

Watch the video. It states that they're going for the maximum of 30.

As someone who has been to prison for two years and seen some shit I can tell you, he is about to see a lot more trouble over the next 20 years as well. This time however, the coward won't have a gun to deal with the trouble that he causes.

@WETiLAMBY you can literally shoot someone for pushing you in Florida though


No matter what you feel about the guy pushing him, shooting someone who is retreating and at that point poses no risk is completely wrong.

No matter what you feel about the guy pushing him, shooting someone who is retreating and at that point poses no risk is completely wrong.

Agreed.<br>On the other hand i can kind of relate if you made that being pushed experience often enough. You are full of adrenaline when pushed down.

Agreed.
On the other hand i can kind of relate if you made that being pushed experience often enough. You are full of adrenaline when pushed down.

@LyssaGames It's also a terrible thing to knock a stranger down who was not being violent.

@LyssaGames It's also a terrible thing to knock a stranger down who was not being violent.

@L4m3nt0 Verbal and physical conflict are two different things. Screaming and cursing never killed anyone.<br>Not defending Drejka here, but there are enough cases of people dying, after someone pushed them. Not even to mention throwing someone. Completely stupid and dangerous thing to do

@L4m3nt0 Verbal and physical conflict are two different things. Screaming and cursing never killed anyone.
Not defending Drejka here, but there are enough cases of people dying, after someone pushed them. Not even to mention throwing someone. Completely stupid and dangerous thing to do

I agree it was totally unnecessary and could have been completely avoided.

I could if he pushed him and then went on top of him and started punching the crap out of him but it was one push and then he backed off which is what you are supposed to do and then if that person that is pushed escalates it from there then its the next persons turn and on and on.

That guy should never have been allowed a gun but of course its never that simple, AND Michael Drejka arrived and parked perpendicular to Jacobs’ car, was also illegally parked and blocking alternate access to that same ramp. Furthermore, while both Drejka and McGlockton were regular customers, the store’s owner, Abdalla “Ali” Salous (not present at the time of the shooting), said he had previously had issues with Drejka at his business. Another customer, Richard Kelly, told Spectrum News that he had an interaction with Drejka after parking in the same improperly marked handicapped parking space weeks prior to the fatal shooting.

No it’s not. By that logic they can shoot your child and run away and can’t be punished

No it’s not. By that logic they can shoot your child and run away and can’t be punished

I completely agree <b>BUT</b> maybe he wouldnt have got shot if he didnt push him? Dont immediately resort to violence, use your words like a grown adult, they both effed up here.

I completely agree *BUT* maybe he wouldnt have got shot if he didnt push him? Dont immediately resort to violence, use your words like a grown adult, they both effed up here.

@Milky Way It absolutely matters that he was walking back, why do you think he got jailed for 20 years? Aggressor or not, this wasn't self defence, he was no longer a threat, nor would he have been without the gun. I'm not saying the assault was justified, assault is still assault, but the shooter was looking for trouble and committing an assault doesn't justify you to shoot somebody retreating. If you don't feel sorry for his death, then how can you believe nobody deserves to die for it? Also, the shooter was parked in an illegal spot as well, so that's a double standard.

Are you people serious!? Listen, I am liberal for the most part. I do think everyone has the right to own a gun tho. But wrong is wrong.

The black guy assaulted the guy first! The white guy was just talking and didn't do anything illegal.

You can say he was annoying or whatever but he didn't assault anyone. It's a free country. First ammendment. Say what you want but when you put your hands on someone and push them that hard to the ground, I no longer view you as the victim but the aggressor.

The black guy only retreated after he saw the gun pointed at him. It didn't matter if he was walking back at that point. The crime of assault was already committed. I am tired of my fellow liberals defending the suspects and victims of police violence no matter what they do. Resisting arrest, punching and cop, driving away, etc.

No one deserves to die for it but obey the law! Don't assault someone. Period. I dont feel bad for the guy who got killed in this situation at all. His girlfriend said, do I need to go get my man. They were the aggressors. The white guy was just annoying and nosy. But they were parked in the handicap parking spot which is also ILLEGAL!!!

@caleb masters You don't have the right to assault somebody just because of an argument. It's also not a good idea as it will only escalate the situation.

@caleb masters You don't have the right to assault somebody just because of an argument. It's also not a good idea as it will only escalate the situation.

End if story shooting the guy was wrong. And honestly I think he had rights to push the guy as he was defending his wife...though maybe a bit excessive.

End if story shooting the guy was wrong. And honestly I think he had rights to push the guy as he was defending his wife...though maybe a bit excessive.

sad that the obvious isnt obvious for most americans

sad that the obvious isnt obvious for most americans

What a life. Your whole life revolves around who parks in a handicap parking spot.

What a life. Your whole life revolves around who parks in a handicap parking spot.

if someone pushed me like that, i'd definitely take a kneecap , thats just me

if someone pushed me like that, i'd definitely take a kneecap , thats just me

@Leeartlee completely agree, gun owners like the manchild in this video who treat their guns like toys are the reason gun advocates look bad. What’s insane to me is there are people in this comment section who seen the beginning footage of marquis backing away from the gun, watching the psychological examination in the video, and the guilty verdict and still think that he was in any way in the right.

Looked to me as if he got shot in the front not the back only retreating after the man had shot him.  Hardly a retreat. I'm not saying what he did was right or wrong because I would have defended my woman and my kid just the same as dude did, and if it was in reverse and I got pushed down I would have got back up and settled it with my hands but I been boxing for a decade and a half and I'm a very able bodied person so if I wasn't it's hard to say. It does seem a bit aggressive to shoot him but hey it's a bit aggressive to shove a handicap person to the ground when it was their fault for parking in a handicap spot in the first damn place.

I’m not sure I would have pushed him but boy do i understand why he did.

I’m not sure I would have pushed him but boy do i understand why he did.

@Tojki people shouldn’t be allowed open carry of fire arms in the states then and this stuff wouldn’t happen.

@Tojki people shouldn’t be allowed open carry of fire arms in the states then and this stuff wouldn’t happen.

@Tojki no I’m not saying that at all, it’s a lot different if it’s your friend rather than a complete stranger. I’m not justifying that it’s right to shoot someone or kill anyone. The situation could have been handled without lethal force. Obviously this man thought his life was in danger.

@ProdByPrimal Who knows what my intentions are walking down the street towards you? How far do we extend this logic? Is it to the point where violence occurs? Who knows my intent in flicking my best friend? Is it to the point of obvious physical confrontation? Who knows some guy's intent in getting into a bar fight with some other guy who hit on his wife? Are we really going to argue that anyone that gets shoved or punched or attacked in any way has the right to shoot their attacker?

Who knows what his intentions were when pushing him to the ground… when you feel your life is in danger you do some pretty wild things. Not saying it’s okay to kill someone but if things got out of hand he could have been the one killed. You always have to look out for yourself in this sick world.

Some people still try to defend the shooter by saying it is self defense despite it not being so whatsoever. If people are this confuse on to what counts as self defense then I am scared to go outside with my child.

@LyssaGames The point I'm trying to make is that shooting someone in the back can sometimes be justified. Sometimes that should be left to the discretion of the victim. YOU yourself may not shoot someone who has robbed you and is running away, but that shouldn't be any of your business if a victim decides they WANT to shoot their assailant as they try to flee. This is how the world should work if we want to decrease the amount of criminals victimizing others.

@James Edward Sterlingthat is an entirely different situation from this one or the one you described. You’re just trying to up the ante to get me to say “okay yes I would kill them” at this point.

@LyssaGames What if someone kept taking from you every day? Everything you traded your labor for, they stole. You would essentially be a slave. Nothing wrong with taking the life of those who act like cockroaches. After all, humans are just animals, and I'm not saying you should take pride in having to kill someone, I'm just saying that sometimes its necessary to kill other animals for your own survival. Food for thought.

@James Edward Sterling no really I wouldn’t. I can go another day without food, I’ll survive, or I know several people who would give me food. Shooting someone in the back over food is something only a friendless coward would do.

True, the act of the guy was killed was to aggressive, but the shooter, he was to angry and he shoots not because he was on danger o losing he’s life, because is was to angry.

True, the act of the guy was killed was to aggressive, but the shooter, he was to angry and he shoots not because he was on danger o losing he’s life, because is was to angry.

no it is not. it is sadly the result of the law. threating the aggressor and brandishing the gun usually comes always with a penalty for the victim, shooting the aggressor should be covered under Floridas stand your ground law. if the skin color would be reversed no one would line up and march for the guy who got shot

@LyssaGames its either that or starve to death. You would choose starvation over stopping the person who is trying to take your means of survival? I think you're just virtue signaling at this point.

@James Edward Sterling no I definitely don’t feel the need or justification to murder someone.

@James Edward Sterling no I definitely don’t feel the need or justification to murder someone.

So if someone steals the only food you have left and is running away, you don't feel morally justified in shooting them in the back? Hmm.

So if someone steals the only food you have left and is running away, you don't feel morally justified in shooting them in the back? Hmm.

@Maximilian Raley I agree. I don't understand this vigilante mentality that is seemingly erupting. I had a handicapped parking permit for my mother who suffered from congestive heart failure. I had let her off at the door of a store and then parked in a handicapped space with permit displayed as I would be escorting my mother back to the car. I went into the store to join my mother. When we returned to the car, there was a scribbled note on our windshield in the most foul language accusing us of fraudulent use of the handicapped space. People, YOU ARE NOT THE POLICE.  Call the police if you perceive an issue. DO NOT TAKE ON THIS RESPONSIBILITY WHICH IS NOT YOURS!!

@William Parker Actually  you can.   Someone stepping backwards isn't a retreat, it can be to conceal pulling a weapon, etc.   Here's a good video of someone walking away who ended up shooting a police officer...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=884W4l3eoQg

Was he retreating?   Come on man, at least look into your claims before you make them.

@Sloth

Once you're WRONGFULLY attacked @Sloth, there's no legal obligation on YOU to prove what degree you BELEIVED he/she intended their attack.

@Sloth

Once you're WRONGFULLY attacked @Sloth, there's no legal obligation on YOU to prove what degree you BELEIVED he/she intended their attack.

@S Ss You could've just said "I'm a racist" and your point would've come across in much fewer words.

@S Ss You could've just said "I'm a racist" and your point would've come across in much fewer words.

There have been all types of murders lately. This is certainly not the America I once knew. I get along with everyone. Sensitive subjects are just not discussed and we can still enjoy ourselves. America is just not a happy place to live anymore. I stay solely to myself. That helps relieve my stress and anxiety because people have gone nuts everywhere.

@FIREBLACK 74.14 “the news” eh? Last “unprovoked shooting” i heard of was a dude who attacked a cop with a rock and tried to steal his gun, after attacking several other couples and stealing a car. Got any others more recent? Sounds like you see at least a couple hundred every year

Yeah, i mean he stood by the car a long time, he sure was waiting to shoot someone. He probably almost shot the kids and the wife in the car. I'm just glad the comment section understands that this is not a back white issue. Problem is both had anger issues, its an anger contest, the one with more anger "won"? idk.

There's this thing called the totality of the situation.   When someone pushes you down, then steps towards you to do something else (as the video shows), and then steps back when you produce a weapon, you don't know if he's retreating or if he's turning to pull a weapon out of sight.

The jury got this 100% wrong.   Play stupid games, win stupid prizes, for both the murdered man and the defendant here.

I mean, TrayVonTe JuWan Jenkins or whatever Drejka's "victim's" name was would be alive if he hadn't committed an unjustified assault on a much older man who was in no way a threat to Shaniqua.

wrong ... keep ur hands off others period

wrong ... keep ur hands off others period

American logic heck yeah freedom brutheeer

American logic heck yeah freedom brutheeer

@Bobby Dee you seem very passionate about this.

@Bobby Dee you seem very passionate about this.

@Ricky Ray and where did I say it was justifiable to shoot?? <br>LEARN TO READ!! Is that hard to understand??

@Ricky Ray and where did I say it was justifiable to shoot??
LEARN TO READ!! Is that hard to understand??

@E T To an extent, but the fact is you DONT SHOOT SOMEBODY IN THE BACK WHO IS FLEEING. How is this such a hard concept?

@E T To an extent, but the fact is you DONT SHOOT SOMEBODY IN THE BACK WHO IS FLEEING. How is this such a hard concept?

Yea the girl shouldn’t have parked there in the first place. She gets out of the car when her an who got shot comes up and pushes the guy when they were just yelling. They’re all at fault.

@Gl 1100 <br>You're speaking about your own comment because the news proves what I said to be  true everyday.

@Gl 1100
You're speaking about your own comment because the news proves what I said to be  true everyday.

He did what cops do everyday. He provoked the situation waited on the perfect opportunity and as soon as he saw that opportunity he got him one.

He did what cops do everyday. He provoked the situation waited on the perfect opportunity and as soon as he saw that opportunity he got him one.

@L4m3nt0 fair but if you keep trying to attack after the gun is pulled it is on you if you get shot.

@L4m3nt0 fair but if you keep trying to attack after the gun is pulled it is on you if you get shot.

@saintretep I agree with you , it’s sad and should not have happened, but the guy was in the right I feel.. I mean would u let some random guy come up and push u down like that ?he also looked like he was going to keep attacking him , The guy was acting way to tough for his own good. I feel sorry for him and his kid.. but the dude really put himself in that situation

@Poker Joker 100% agree. bro shouldnt have pushed him. man was tryna be a hero in front of his girl and unfortunately caused his demise.  i personally would never shoot someone if they werent a threat but i would also never be treated like sh.t either, especially if i wasnt causing no sort of physical altercation. big bro was asking for trouble when he pushed him to the ground, and even though shooting him was not the right thing to do, i don’t completely blame him for doing so.

@Venge Drip he didn't though. She shot him once after getting pushed to the ground, and then the victim began to flee.

@Venge Drip he didn't though. She shot him once after getting pushed to the ground, and then the victim began to flee.

@Patrick O'Reilly Yep. The only reason Drejka is in jail is that he didn't speak to a lawyer immediately. 22:15 for commentary essentially saying it.

@Patrick O'Reilly Yep. The only reason Drejka is in jail is that he didn't speak to a lawyer immediately. 22:15 for commentary essentially saying it.

But Brotha should have maintained his temper by not putting his hands on Drejka. Regardless, like it or not, Drejka is still alive and will serve maybe 35 percent of his 20 year sentence.

@Bobby Dee pushing to the ground someone who is shorter and weaker than you isnt brave either

@Bobby Dee pushing to the ground someone who is shorter and weaker than you isnt brave either

Wait to cast judgment until you're in that split second decision and scared you're about to get hurt badly with adrenaline coursing  through your body.

Wait to cast judgment until you're in that split second decision and scared you're about to get hurt badly with adrenaline coursing  through your body.

@Cybertech66 Absolutely not. I've had someone confront my fiance for the exact same thing. We had a handicapped placard though and they said we didn't "look" disabled. Whatever that means. I ran out. I didn't run up to the guy, just ran close enough that I could see what was happening. I walked up calmly and introduced myself as the ladys fiance and then we talked about it. The craziest part is we walked away from that with us both disagreeing. He didn't like that we didn't appear handicapped. I told him she had scoliosis and such. He didn't want to hear it and cussed me out. Sure i could have gotten aggressive back but that serves no purpose. As adults we need to start choosing our battles far more wisely and stop thinking the aggressive one is somehow the winner.

Guy got smoked because he was angry and got physical before verbal

Guy got smoked because he was angry and got physical before verbal

@Venge Drip That's exactly what she said..... Lmao you disagreeable guy you

@Venge Drip That's exactly what she said..... Lmao you disagreeable guy you

@Maximilian Raley I don't disagree with that. I think people went inside and told the guy that someone was in the parking lot cursing out his girlfriend so he came out hot. That mistake cost him his life, but it shouldn't have. No winners here.

@Cybertech66 oh shit i realized i replied to the wrong person

@Cybertech66 oh shit i realized i replied to the wrong person

He started a conflict. If I leave a store and find a man squared off against my wife and kids, I will also come out throwing punches.

He started a conflict. If I leave a store and find a man squared off against my wife and kids, I will also come out throwing punches.

@Cal Thanks...I will use that from here on out!

@Cal Thanks...I will use that from here on out!

@Cybertech66 for future reference when someone uses 🙃 it's always sarcastic lol

@Cybertech66 for future reference when someone uses 🙃 it's always sarcastic lol

@Cybertech66 lol your powers of sarcasm are too strong, I bow to you 😂 went right over my head

@Cybertech66 lol your powers of sarcasm are too strong, I bow to you 😂 went right over my head

@LyssaGames I was being facetious and just joking. I totally understood your point and was merely playing on the fact  @Dystroxy TG repeated your  comment, so I repeated it again. 😉

@LyssaGames I was being facetious and just joking. I totally understood your point and was merely playing on the fact  @Dystroxy TG repeated your  comment, so I repeated it again. 😉

@Cybertech66 it’s both legally and morally wrong. Of course it’s illegal, but it’s also a terrible thing to do.

I saw a few comments where people said the husband shouldn’t have pushed the shooter to begin with, so I’m saying no matter how you feel about the pushing, shooting him was wrong, both legally and morally (so completely). That is exactly what my comment is saying.

@LyssaGames I totally understand the point  @Dystroxy TG is making, but I am not sure I understand your point? <br>Don't you know that it is illegal to shoot someone who is retreating and poses no risk no matter how you may feel about them? 🙃

@LyssaGames I totally understand the point  @Dystroxy TG is making, but I am not sure I understand your point?
Don't you know that it is illegal to shoot someone who is retreating and poses no risk no matter how you may feel about them? 🙃

@Venge Drip uhh, yeah? Sorry I’m confused is that not the basic point of my comment or are you reiterating it for emphasis?

@Venge Drip uhh, yeah? Sorry I’m confused is that not the basic point of my comment or are you reiterating it for emphasis?

Hey it’s kinda illegal to shoot someone if they turn around and start retreating/running away, sooo….he kinda just killed that dude in cold blood.

Hey it’s kinda illegal to shoot someone if they turn around and start retreating/running away, sooo….he kinda just killed that dude in cold blood.


He's far more persistent on making it seem like he was "using a gun correctly" rather than "being innocent". Its stupidly hilarious.

@The Real Maxis dude he is obviously trolling...

@The Real Maxis sadly there are plenty of people like them

I think law enforcement should already be looking into Sabrason's identity, as this guy is just as much a threat to society as the criminal in the video. Hopefully nothing happens, but if Sabrason ever commits a crime, it would be nice to have the prosecution use these comments as proof of his crooked mental state.

PS can't wait for his reply 🤣

@Lancaster Oh yeah, and Drejka's single, well-placed bullet hit center mass (albeit a tad to the left b/c McGlockton half-turned at the last instant) ripping through the lung and heart and forced a guy high on Molly to run and hide before bleeding out. Threat neutralized.  That's what I call phenomenal self defense!!  I only hope my training allows me to perform as well with my .357 Magnum if/when the time comes.

@Sabrason well placed bullet?? Do you know anything about self defense?

@ChrisW Stop lying.  McGlockton had several amphetamines like Molly in his system which causes, among other things, aggressive/violent behavior....look it up.  He was a drug addict with a history of assaulting a police officer so he thought he could lay hands on people and did so in front of his little kids....not exactly a healthy father figure and certainly no model citizen.   He also took 2-3 additional steps TOWARDS Drejka AFTER the push which would make any normal person who was violently pushed to the ground and injured reasonably fear further bodily harm which justifies the use of lethal force = classic SYG law which is why many national legal experts agreed. McGlockton slightly turning his body to one side meant nothing in that instant as he could've just as easily been repositioning to pull his own firearm so Drejka had NO choice but to fire.  This is basic common sense.  Had McGlockton immediately put his hands up and said "don't shoot" I could agree with you but he didn't.   Any opinion to the contrary relies on hindsight and additional information obtained long AFTER the fact that Drejka did not have at the moment of the conflict.

@Sabrason I beg to differ, as the prosecutor stated clear as day he was justified in pulling the weapon, but considering the victim (who isn't a drug addict) was not only backing off, but was already a considerable distance from the defendant, AND was unarmed, he was completely and utterly unjustified to fire. Which is why I believe he should rot in jail, as he not only killed a man while not justified to, but is also a threat to society in my eyes.

Yeah, so what?  He was a calm, experienced and confident gun owner who DID use it correctly and responded to a hostile aggressor in a very limited and measured way considering he only shot one, well-place bullet AFTER being violently assaulted by an aggressive drug addict.

That's what people get taught. I've always been told that if someone picks up a gun or brings it with them, that they are fully prepared to use it to kill something so it shouldn't have ever been about whether it was legal to carry the gun