I don't think I have ever seen a better advertisement for getting a lawyer

I don't think I have ever seen a better advertisement for getting a lawyer

@Anonymous Bosch Agree that it is manslaughter and the conviction was the correct outcome. BUT... it is also correct to say that the guy was a serious threat. After he shoved the shooter, he DID start to move towards him... and we can only speculate what would have happened had the shooter not brandished a gun. I dont think it is unreasonable to assume he would have put a serious beating on him. As Max said, only a dangerous person would react that way to a verbal argument.

@Nicholas Payne I'm not sure about that, imo the video doesn't decisively show that the victim was retreating. On the other hand, the victim had already acted violently seconds earlier so it stands to reason that he was likely to attack again.

@Nicholas Payne I'm not sure about that, imo the video doesn't decisively show that the victim was retreating. On the other hand, the victim had already acted violently seconds earlier so it stands to reason that he was likely to attack again.

@Max Schneiter Getting pushed isn't an excuse to shoot someone especially when they're backing away from you

@Max Schneiter Getting pushed isn't an excuse to shoot someone especially when they're backing away from you

@Max Schneiter The guy shouldn't have pushed him but he was backing up when he got shot there is absolutely no justification for that

@Max Schneiter The guy shouldn't have pushed him but he was backing up when he got shot there is absolutely no justification for that

Better call Saul. Though it is fictional

Better call Saul. Though it is fictional

Parked in the handicap. Then assaults someone...he definitely getting shot! Then lawyer up! You know how many people get stomped out in a coma or dead...

Parked in the handicap. Then assaults someone...he definitely getting shot! Then lawyer up! You know how many people get stomped out in a coma or dead...

@Neeltje Kijkt Joeptjoep in the US everyone has a right to an attorney and a fair trial.

@Neeltje Kijkt Joeptjoep in the US everyone has a right to an attorney and a fair trial.

And then what? Those kids grow up hearing the man who killed their father went free?

And then what? Those kids grow up hearing the man who killed their father went free?

This whole channel is a big ruse to get you to get yourself a lawyer then LCS will dm you and tell you he actually is one and he can help... Probably.

This whole channel is a big ruse to get you to get yourself a lawyer then LCS will dm you and tell you he actually is one and he can help... Probably.

@Ark worthy in that we agree, I negotiate things for a living and I sometimes forget all the ways we make points in loose talk when we’re casually writing

@Ark worthy in that we agree, I negotiate things for a living and I sometimes forget all the ways we make points in loose talk when we’re casually writing

@Anonymous Bosch That's exactly what I am doing.  We're likely in agreement that killing anyone (outside of wildly unfortunate aggravated circumstances) is not a decent thing to do.  That said, it's why I am remarking on how strange it is that in some cases, one is more likely to receive a tougher sentence if they DON'T pull that trigger.  I understand the logic behind it, but I wish there were a better precedent for it.

@Ark worthy I don’t think it’s a good idea to kill anyone unless absolutely necessary for the survival or defense from grievous bodily harm for yourself or others. The idea that I’m legally better off taking a life if I’ve needed to draw my weapon makes me concerned about your training and mindset more than I’m concerned about the legal trends in our country. I’m going to assume you’re simply using a bit of hyperbole to make a point about the sometimes absurd rulings of our courts than being literal about killing people

@Anonymous Bosch Sure, but there are lots of cases where the brandishing of a gun is legitimised by the use of the weapon, and vice versa the presence of the gun is de-legitimised by not having being used.  There are therefore plenty of cases where you would be better of just killing someone.  Or so it would seem.

@Ark worthy it’s totally legal to stop a threat with the presence of a gun if the conditions are legally justified. Brandishing a weapon when not justified is still very illegal

@Ark worthy it’s totally legal to stop a threat with the presence of a gun if the conditions are legally justified. Brandishing a weapon when not justified is still very illegal

@Anonymous Bosch if you draw your weapon and do not fire, in many US states, you're still off to jail. In many cases it is better to fire it than not

@Anonymous Bosch if you draw your weapon and do not fire, in many US states, you're still off to jail. In many cases it is better to fire it than not

@Michael Zomsuv No, that’s not my question. <br>Do you think that the same number of people are shot that fall down? Which is the more lethal mechanism?

@Michael Zomsuv No, that’s not my question.
Do you think that the same number of people are shot that fall down? Which is the more lethal mechanism?

@Christian Van Matre Why are you asking the same questions again?<br>I answered everything in my last comment. To repeat myself, deaths by falling is #4 cause of death in the USA. Death by gun shot is #14. There's 100 times more deaths by falling than death by gun shots in the US.

@Christian Van Matre Why are you asking the same questions again?
I answered everything in my last comment. To repeat myself, deaths by falling is #4 cause of death in the USA. Death by gun shot is #14. There's 100 times more deaths by falling than death by gun shots in the US.

@Michael Zomsuv Why cuss at me dude? Are you ok?

My larger point was a mental exercise; ask yourself these questions: How many people fall per day? How many people are shot per day? Which action results in a larger number of deaths per event?

@Michael Zomsuv Why cuss at me dude? Are you ok?

My larger point was a mental exercise; ask yourself these questions: How many people fall per day? How many people are shot per day? Which action results in a larger number of deaths per event?

@Michael Zomsuv I’d like to see the statistics of dying from falling weird. Do you think it causes more frequent deaths than bullets to the chest?

@Michael Zomsuv I’d like to see the statistics of dying from falling weird. Do you think it causes more frequent deaths than bullets to the chest?

Not going anywhere for a while?<br>Grab a Snickers.

Not going anywhere for a while?
Grab a Snickers.

@Max Schneiter Except his life was threatened. He was pushed from the back on a concrete floor. People DIE ALL THE TIME from falling wrong. He would have died or end up in a wheel chair had he fell on the head.

@Max Schneiter Except his life was threatened. He was pushed from the back on a concrete floor. People DIE ALL THE TIME from falling wrong. He would have died or end up in a wheel chair had he fell on the head.

@Michael Zomsuv Yes. I agree that this was justified self defense, but the shooter was also very stupid and largely responsible for his own predicament. He strikes me as very naive and childish, playing cop like a little kid. Worst of all, because of his ego I think he was afraid to admit to the police that he was scared after the push. You cannot claim self defense with a lethal weapon unless you feel that your life was in danger. His inability to admit that did him in.

@Max Schneiter You said it perfectly. The shooter responded to a physical aggression. And the aggressor responded to a simple verbal argument. It's a shame he went to prison for defending himself but at least he got rid of that animal. (whoever resorts to violence in an argument is an animal).

He shooted in response to a physical aggression while the first man assaulted him in response to fucking WORDS. Shooting in response to a physical aggression is 100% justified. Starting physical aggression in response to a simple VERBAL altercation, is NEVER justified. Furthermore, the physical aggression WAS life threating. Would he have fell wrong on the concrete floor, he would have died. All you here minimizing the push, but in reality HE COULD HAVE DIED. PEOPLE DIE ALL THE TIME FROM FALLING WRONG. The shooting was a 100% justified response to a life threating aggression.

NEVER EVER NEVER TALK WITHOUT A LAWYER.  The narrator of this video is bias - it shouldn’t be an opinion video

NEVER EVER NEVER TALK WITHOUT A LAWYER.  The narrator of this video is bias - it shouldn’t be an opinion video

@Alex Xela you're all across these types of videos laying blame when it appears you can't grasp context.

@Alex Xela you're all across these types of videos laying blame when it appears you can't grasp context.

@C. Elizabeth The jury system you have in the US is so bad. You basically need to play an fucking act as a lawyer to "please" the jury LMAO xDDD

@C. Elizabeth The jury system you have in the US is so bad. You basically need to play an fucking act as a lawyer to "please" the jury LMAO xDDD

@Kingof Grim It is not a "normal reaction" to blindside someone without saying a word just because he is arguing with your wife. If he had survived he would have been charged with assault. If you honestly think that it is acceptable to assault someone for arguing with someone you know than you need to get some anger management treatment.

@Max Schneiter
“Only a dangerously violent person would react the way he did to an argument”
I’m sure the people tore you a new one for this upsurdly hilarious claim. But to just make it easy
1. You require a reality check.
2. More importantly: if you saw ur wife and kids (or S/O and kids, family, etc) and there was a dude getting in their face, yelling and more, you’re not gonna do shit about it? LMAO please

@AugustusCaesar I agree, but if the accusation of over-escalation of violence is EVER thrown around here, then both parties are supremely guilty. The difference is:

1 Pushed a person to the ground
1 Shot a person

There is no comparison.

@AugustusCaesar I agree, but if the accusation of over-escalation of violence is EVER thrown around here, then both parties are supremely guilty. The difference is:

1 Pushed a person to the ground
1 Shot a person

There is no comparison.

Finally they must be a erasing all the comments were people use common sense. This is the first one I have seen and I have read a lot. Seems like you have to tiptoe around with your speech anymore or people want to use violence against you quick

Finally they must be a erasing all the comments were people use common sense. This is the first one I have seen and I have read a lot. Seems like you have to tiptoe around with your speech anymore or people want to use violence against you quick

Correct Marquis should have never  resorted  to violence over Words you don’t want to hear

Correct Marquis should have never  resorted  to violence over Words you don’t want to hear

@Pareen Pattni lol. wow. you said in your first comment (making the smart point, he shouldn't get a lawyer because he is guilty - isn't that you deciding smart guy?) because guilty people w/ lawyers have been found not guilty sometimes. my question was/is, HOW DO YOU KNOW THEY WERE GUILTY? because of the news? if they are found not guilty, they are...NOT GUILTY. but this is my fault...argue with a fool, look like a fool.

@N Anderson Did I once mention I will decide? Don’t say things I didn’t mean and make stupid assumptions. I was expressing my thought like a thousand other people here and you have no right to tell me not to comment. I don’t want to comment anything on America’s “ beauty of the legal system”. If you don’t agree with me, it’s fine. It appears that you tend to know everything and all the concepts and can’t stand anyone else to say anything against your thought process , good for you.

@Pareen Pattni "better that a 100 guilty men go free than one innocent man be punished".....again, it's the beauty of our legal system. Who decides they, "committed the crime and got away"? you? If you don't understand that concept you should probably avoid commenting. It's legal theory 101.

@N Anderson I am not a trump supporter, mate. Please don’t make such assumptions and no I do not know everything. I only expressed my thought because sometimes people who have committed the crimes get away by proving not guilty with the lawyers and it’s unjust. Nothing else 🙂

@N Anderson I am not a trump supporter, mate. Please don’t make such assumptions and no I do not know everything. I only expressed my thought because sometimes people who have committed the crimes get away by proving not guilty with the lawyers and it’s unjust. Nothing else 🙂

@Pareen Pattni of course...you don't? So if Pareen Pattni thinks he is guilty he shouldn't get legal representation? The beauty of our legal system is that everyone, guilty or not, is entitled to a lawyer. I know you know everything and you would never ever convict an innocent man but we are all not so perfect. Let me guess, Trump also had the election stolen from him, right?

@Max Schneiter I agree not only America but the whole world. But most of the times guilty people are made to win the case by the defenders attorneys manipulative talks which is unjust

@Max Schneiter I agree not only America but the whole world. But most of the times guilty people are made to win the case by the defenders attorneys manipulative talks which is unjust

@Pareen Pattni Of course, every American is entitled to legal representation. It's literally stated in the Miranda Rights that are read to people who are placed under arrest. There is also this little thing we call "Innocent until Proven Guilty".

@Pareen Pattni Of course, every American is entitled to legal representation. It's literally stated in the Miranda Rights that are read to people who are placed under arrest. There is also this little thing we call "Innocent until Proven Guilty".

So you think he should get lawyer protection? Huh? A man who played cop and killed a person?

So you think he should get lawyer protection? Huh? A man who played cop and killed a person?

i would have him out of jail and the case dropped in a week if he was my client. period

i would have him out of jail and the case dropped in a week if he was my client. period

It's great that this guy didn't get a lawyer. The world is better off without him on the streets.

It's great that this guy didn't get a lawyer. The world is better off without him on the streets.

@Jacob P Here is the difference: it is perfectly legal and not unreasonable to verbally confront someone if you disagree with what they are doing. On the otherhand, It is perfectly illegal and unreasonable to assault someone because they confronted someone you know. Freedom of speech does not allow you to assault someone, it does allow you to tell them you dont like what they are doing though.

@Jacob P I dont think it is ever a good idea to argue with any stranger about anything, but assault is never a legal response to an argument

@Jacob P I dont think it is ever a good idea to argue with any stranger about anything, but assault is never a legal response to an argument

@Max Schneiter If someone parking in a handicap parking spot is worth arguing with, you should just call the appropriate people to deal with it.

@Max Schneiter If someone parking in a handicap parking spot is worth arguing with, you should just call the appropriate people to deal with it.

@Max Schneiter wouldn't it be better and safer to report such a "crime" to the appropriate person. It goes both ways, instead of arguing with a female who obviously isn't going to listen. There are always better and safer options. You could always lock yourself in a closet and have the most scientifically safe water and food fed to you (can go on and on).

@Jacob P Your reaction is to blindside him without saying a word? Wouldnt it be better (and safer) to confront him man to man?

@Jacob P Your reaction is to blindside him without saying a word? Wouldnt it be better (and safer) to confront him man to man?

Corrrect indeed! As a matter of fact- EVERY video on this channel is a prime example of
NEVER TALK TO LAW ENFORCEMENT WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY PRESENT!!!!
I don’t care if police are interviewing you about your cat getting hit by a car.. HAVE A LAWYER PRESENT or end the interview. PERIOD THE END! People can be so clueless.  Smdh.

@DeludoSui thats not how self defense works. Much in the same way if someone pushed you and you punched them til they died you would be be charged, because somewhere in there they weren't a threat anymore and you used excessive force. Same applies here he pushed him which was assault, and like they said he had every right to pull his pistol out no ones arguing that. Now had the man kept charging him that would be self defense, but because he stopped and was in the process of retreating he was no longer a threat which makes shooting him unjustified and not self defense. So the video does not show self defense and therefore shows an unjustified shooting. And against your argument of him being doomed because it was political this whole video is the interrogation right after this incident happened, he was doomed that day. And like many others have said he's had a history of getting to altercations, even drawing his firearm on a woman with her kids in the car. He was pushed and wanted a chance to use his firearm plain and simple

No Fux I’m not into simple answers for a whole category as much as taking each shooting on a case by case basis and asking the most important question which is “Did the person have to shoot” and we use the standard of would a competent peer make the same judgment and in this case I don’t think they would

I know you guys hate to see the law not be on the side of your opinion. HAHAH

I know you guys hate to see the law not be on the side of your opinion. HAHAH

@DeludoSuiHe would be innocent if he fired immediately.  Instead he wait for the guy to no only back away but actually turning his body to leave.  At this point you can't argue, "I feared for my life" anymore.  Not to mention he started the entire altercation because in his mind he thinks that's his store.

It didn't matter though.  He was a political example.  He was fucked no matter what.  The video is proof of his innocence yet everyone in this here comment section thinks otherwise because why did he shoot the guy violently assaulting him... he backed up... yea nothing stopping that guy from charging him and killing him if he put the gun down.  Sorry they could have avoided the entire thing by not assaulting him and or not arguing in the first place.

@Anonymous Bosch Yep if he pulled his weapon and instantly fired it would have been self defense. The attacker wouldn't have had time to back off.

@Anonymous Bosch Yep if he pulled his weapon and instantly fired it would have been self defense. The attacker wouldn't have had time to back off.

Aly-Bocar Cisse Justice is also having a right to defend yourself in a court of law, but we see what you did there.

Aly-Bocar Cisse Justice is also having a right to defend yourself in a court of law, but we see what you did there.

I’m glad he did not get one. Weird how a lawyer, could have helped not get justice done that day...

I’m glad he did not get one. Weird how a lawyer, could have helped not get justice done that day...

@Jokul Snow What about shock?!?! 2.5 secs to react?!?!

@Jokul Snow What about shock?!?! 2.5 secs to react?!?!

@videocadet 6 months late, but you do NOT shoot for the limbs.  Your chances of missing (which are already high for people who don't train all the time) increase significantly and people can still die very rapidly from limb shots if it hits the right place.  If you pull the trigger, it is ONLY because your, or someone else's, life is in imminent danger, period.  As the prosecutor said, he was fully justified in pulling his gun, but he definitely should not have pulled the trigger as he was no longer in danger of life or serious injury as the guy was definitely no longer advancing.

Only had over an hour to come up with that plan! 🙄🙄🙄

Only had over an hour to come up with that plan! 🙄🙄🙄

I'm loving everyone's opinions on this case. Yes he deserved jail. The guy was protecting his lady, true that.

I'm loving everyone's opinions on this case. Yes he deserved jail. The guy was protecting his lady, true that.

@AndroidDoctorr ....no no respect your handcapped...dont put
  color politics... drejka definitely hit hard enough to be not thinking
      total clear..and the guy still there ..the girlfriend""??  who could
   have fixed was as i said before..getting out to do some more smartmouth it appears...  and 50-50 for sure self defense in fear
 of life..  ''remember dont doctor here''hah...''fear'' of''  life''  ...
    and if the black guy who hit him nfl hard could have killed anyway...
  u missing...and just bc he was bitching correctly...he had not done
 anything besides that and was ''away''from her car..enough...further
   than i have seen a lot of ppl do...so that was fair enough... so if
  the hard hit had killed the guy drejka...  drejka deserves doubt...
     cant tell if he was '''out in head'' or not...now u believe me...
  im older white [called white]  and i been in shock fear from getting
     hit...and i more believe the ''big bullies'' of any kind deserve it when
   the do that on purpose... u should too... had to answer a few of these
 for that reason..  30yrs of mouth and lip...in many places...needs to
come under control...and physical hard hitting...bc u think u gonna
  get away with it...needs to stop...   i wish a better way...
      and wish it was a wounded shot...but...    if anything ...whites
talking here need to ''wake''  ....  if anything...that was definitely a
    ''racial hate crime'' by marquis...and...girlfriend...she cranked it up...
          if we do call police as should and report...plz dont call the police bullies??     quit being such a trained oneway... i have seen black and
others not hire lawyer...get a public defender like in good old nyc or
chicago...and get away with something like that 2-3- times in my
 life when it was black shoot white...and one shoot a teen...and call
 it ''threats and racial hate name calling'' and get away with it...dismissed...
      totally no real proof always...
      and drejka maybe ddnt mean to shoot where he did...would have to
   determine that also...   any case,,  lighter sentence due to circumstance...

All these videos on this channel have convinced me

All these videos on this channel have convinced me

@scumshine Instigated what? He was just talking.

@scumshine Instigated what? He was just talking.

@Frank His defense was fucked as soon as he started blabbing to the cops, something a good lawyer would have never let him do.

@Frank His defense was fucked as soon as he started blabbing to the cops, something a good lawyer would have never let him do.

the tire tracks + boots one is a better one

the tire tracks + boots one is a better one

no name well he don’t own that parking spot so he should of minded his damn business.Dont let some white man tell you what you can and cannot do.Stand for something

no name well he don’t own that parking spot so he should of minded his damn business.Dont let some white man tell you what you can and cannot do.Stand for something

@Sentinel Liberty Protecting her from what exactly? Some guy telling her to move her car? Maybe he was less than polite, but that isn't an excuse to blindside someone.

@Sentinel Liberty Protecting her from what exactly? Some guy telling her to move her car? Maybe he was less than polite, but that isn't an excuse to blindside someone.

@Max Schneiter "Dangerously violent"? He was coming to the defense of his wife because another man was in close proximity and agitating her. 'Course he shouldn't have put his hands on another person legally not that anyone could've blamed him for it. Everyone was in the wrong. And it began with Drejka roleplaying a cop to mask his massive insecurities and physical weakness.

@Andrew Cargil I hope you're being sarcastic with your "are you saying men and women aren't equal?" comment.

@Andrew Cargil I hope you're being sarcastic with your "are you saying men and women aren't equal?" comment.

Jokul Snow not true, if you run in you in the open like that you risk getting shot on the back , plus he was judging to see if he would shot his wife are the kids in the car, he was still trying to protect. Did you know a mother put her body over her 6 month child when cops was shooting in the car and save her baby life. She did no crime she was a bysider. Yes, some people will only think of themself but there are people out there that think about others. A person did me like that when a gun was pull out, not everybody will run if they think you are the crazy one and trying to save a life. He was defending her and it show to the very end that was on his mind.

C. Elizabeth it was like the lawyer was working against him.

C. Elizabeth it was like the lawyer was working against him.

Brooke Lovett but that is the golden rule. Any decent human being knows that. I think the murder goes way past the point you are identifying. The lawyer part always comes much later, after the crime has been committed. JMO, of course.

Brooke Lovett but that is the golden rule. Any decent human being knows that. I think the murder goes way past the point you are identifying. The lawyer part always comes much later, after the crime has been committed. JMO, of course.

Max Schneiter Or not ending the life of a man in front of his family over a parking dispute? I think that’s clearly the more poignant lesson.

Max Schneiter Or not ending the life of a man in front of his family over a parking dispute? I think that’s clearly the more poignant lesson.

Frank woah hey, very few people are defending this guy in the comments. We’d still convict him, tyvm

Frank woah hey, very few people are defending this guy in the comments. We’d still convict him, tyvm

Ellipsis of Triple Tap<br>So basically, being pushed down is equivalent to being shot and killed? He easily could’ve gone for the legs and/or REASSESSED to confirm whether the “attacker” would continue to escalate the situation prior to ending his life. “Logic”, nowadays...

Ellipsis of Triple Tap
So basically, being pushed down is equivalent to being shot and killed? He easily could’ve gone for the legs and/or REASSESSED to confirm whether the “attacker” would continue to escalate the situation prior to ending his life. “Logic”, nowadays...

So you can get away with murder? Take accountability for your actions instead!

So you can get away with murder? Take accountability for your actions instead!

jmh4ggg No you don't do the same. You verbally attempt to resolve the situation. We're talking about superior human beings here.

jmh4ggg No you don't do the same. You verbally attempt to resolve the situation. We're talking about superior human beings here.

slowed down if he hadn't physically assaulted an innocent man in front of children hed be alive

slowed down if he hadn't physically assaulted an innocent man in front of children hed be alive

@Andrew Cargil You know what they say about hope. It breeds eternal misery

@Andrew Cargil You know what they say about hope. It breeds eternal misery

Sadly yes, everyone thinks they can talk their way out of a security camera. The only thing that could possibly happen from the whole interrogation is him screwing himself over.

Sadly yes, everyone thinks they can talk their way out of a security camera. The only thing that could possibly happen from the whole interrogation is him screwing himself over.

@Jokul Snow the thing is, his wife and kids were still there, so running is not an easy choice. I know I would have been torn between running and protecting my family. I've been in a situation where I had to stand between my wife and a very angry(for no reason) cop, the instinct to protect is a strong thing.

@C. Elizabeth That lady was not a juror, she was in the audience. They do not show the jurors on TV until after the case.

@C. Elizabeth That lady was not a juror, she was in the audience. They do not show the jurors on TV until after the case.

@Max Schneiter People have pointed out that he didn't step towards the shooter.  But he didn't run either.  Not sure how I feel about the shooter (even with time to think about it), but if I'm unarmed and I pushed a guy and he pulled a gun I'm sure I know what I'd do. Run to the other dudes car for cover.  If he shot him in the back 2.5 seconds after showing his weapon the hang him. But 2.5 seconds is a long time to not run away.

This guy carried a weapon with the wrong mindset. He was quick to be in an altercation which caused a man to come to his wife’s defense. He caused the event and responded in error with deadly force. He should have minded his own business. Right or wrong, he should have lawyered up.

Right! The whole time I was like this guy needs to STOP TALKING LIKE NOW! Geez.....he was wrong on so many levels.  He picked a fight and got made when he got pushed down in the schoolyard.  What was up with that sling that he made? Ridiculous, Im glad he got time.

Right! The whole time I was like this guy needs to STOP TALKING LIKE NOW! Geez.....he was wrong on so many levels.  He picked a fight and got made when he got pushed down in the schoolyard.  What was up with that sling that he made? Ridiculous, Im glad he got time.

@Ellipsis of Triple Tap You're very clearly racist and I hope you change. I don't have an opinion on this case but you're scaring me. Don't hurt people please and try to be less racist. Ik you probably won't listen to a random person on the internet, but your life will be a lot better through loving others.

@Alienated TV striking or pushing someone from a blind angle is both cowardly and dangerous. Plenty of people have died or become seriously injured by hitting their heads on asphalt or concrete.

@Alienated TV striking or pushing someone from a blind angle is both cowardly and dangerous. Plenty of people have died or become seriously injured by hitting their heads on asphalt or concrete.

@scumshine People have literally died from being shoved to concrete as well as have been stomped and kicked causing great bodily harm so, yeah, that shove could definitely be grounds for deadly force...

@scumshine People have literally died from being shoved to concrete as well as have been stomped and kicked causing great bodily harm so, yeah, that shove could definitely be grounds for deadly force...

Ellipsis of Triple Tap “fight fire with fire” are you actually trying to compare being shoved to being shot? and you talk about logic

Ellipsis of Triple Tap “fight fire with fire” are you actually trying to compare being shoved to being shot? and you talk about logic

@Ellipsis of Triple Tap if he hadn't approached the vehicle, called the cops or reported them to authorities (like he should have if he actually thought they were doing something wrong), and minded his business, this wouldn't have happened. this has nothing to do with your pre-existing biases.

@SatanIceCream Words are words, the "victim" initiated the ACTUAL battery: fight words with words, fight fire with fire...

@SatanIceCream Words are words, the "victim" initiated the ACTUAL battery: fight words with words, fight fire with fire...

The most damning thing was that he had done this 4 times before, no amount of lawyers can save you after that.

The most damning thing was that he had done this 4 times before, no amount of lawyers can save you after that.

Lawyers defend the innocent and the innocent are smart enough to get lawers. This guy shot a retreating man so he clearly is not intelligent. Wouldve been self defense if the guy wouldve kept at him but still why didnt he just get back and hit him back? It was a shooting of anger any normal person wouldve either fist fought or stopped after pointing the gun.

@Max Schneiter Depending on where you're from, you may have a different standard of dangerously violent. Seeing a guy knocked to the ground may be shocking to some people, other people might see that he didn't hit him when he was down. The victim was threatening but not life-threatening. I think the killer was motivated by his desire for revenge, not fear.

@scumshine There are endless videos of  black women ramping up and agitating their overly emotional "men" into furious/violent action. I imagine that it's what we saw here...

@scumshine There are endless videos of  black women ramping up and agitating their overly emotional "men" into furious/violent action. I imagine that it's what we saw here...

Absolutely, be it right or wrong, this guy more than likely would have walked if he had shut up and used his rights for a lawyer.

Absolutely, be it right or wrong, this guy more than likely would have walked if he had shut up and used his rights for a lawyer.

Max Schneiter if you point your weapon, which I have, at the threat and the threat is then over and you still shoot, murder

Max Schneiter if you point your weapon, which I have, at the threat and the threat is then over and you still shoot, murder

@Anonymous Bosch Or not resulting to violence in the first place.

@Anonymous Bosch Or not resulting to violence in the first place.

But not the guy that actually defended him. When he said that the parking lot commando was the "Real Victim" that got NO favor with the jury. That one lady was like WTF?!?!

But not the guy that actually defended him. When he said that the parking lot commando was the "Real Victim" that got NO favor with the jury. That one lady was like WTF?!?!

Max Schneiter or not shooting in moderate violence but yes lawyer for sure

Max Schneiter or not shooting in moderate violence but yes lawyer for sure


If Dreyka hit his head when he was viciously pushed and died or if his assailant finished what he started no one would make the race question.


“It’s our god given right as Americans to have guns” 🤣🤣


Man, the comment section is terrible. People just looking to excuse murder

@Chillin' Squirtle Fair enough. If the comments section was as you described, that is pretty messed up.

@Arif yee, must have just gotten a bunch of stupid comments around the time I watched it a few weeks ago. Glad to see it's not usually like that

From my view, most of the comments seem to be alluding to the idea that the perpetrator is a military wannabe/loser

@keian roth when I looked I was sorting by recent

All the top comments are mocking the shooter


This is a perfect example of who should not be granted a license to carry a firearm. Nobody is trying to take guns away from people. The vetting process needs to slow down and be done deliberately, with full on psychiatric evaluation being a part of it. In stages. Not unlike the process to obtain a pilot's license. Can't let sketchy people operate an airborne vehicle willy nilly, and can't let a sketchy person just be able to carry around a gun at the fkng Dollar store, enforcing parking laws. This is ridiculous. All you completely responsible folks who move around with firearms and know the severity of it, get on board keeping them out of the wrong hands please.