Are we gonna ignore the fact that this clown started a quarrel with the family for illegally parking despite him ILLEGALLY parking too?

@Cecile King secondly... I don't have a wife.. If I did she wouldnt be knowingly parking in a handicap spot.. And she wouldnt be arguing with someone over it if she had.. And of course im not into women that would..

@Cecile King i feel murder can happen from a push... It has happened.. One punch can and has killed people old and young... Further more an argument over a parking spot does not require a physical assault like we saw here... Do you??... Its a sign of really poor judgment... Possibly an issue regarding psychosis.. I played football and getting hit from behind is illegal for a reason... People can get extreemly hurt ir worse... Those that commit the fouls get flagged or ejected... Penalties... Im not saying life is a game of football.. Its dead serious... And everybody needs to see that as clear in this video...

@Paul Burke No matter what...you feel murdering another for a push is justified. If you saw a man verbally assaulting your wife with children in car ...would you be concerned? The gun holder was a coward and made an irresponsible irreversible decision regarding another human's life that he did not value in his rush to be right

@Cecile King Incorrect. From the 2020 statues on handicap parking in Florida. "316.1955 Enforcement of parking requirements for persons who have disabilities.—
(1) It is unlawful for any person to stop, stand, or park a vehicle within, or to obstruct, any such specially designated and marked parking space provided in accordance with s. 553.5041, unless the vehicle displays a disabled parking permit issued under s. 316.1958 or s. 320.0848 or a license plate issued under s. 320.084, s. 320.0842, s. 320.0843, or s. 320.0845, and the vehicle is transporting the person to whom the displayed permit is issued."
This is similar to how EVERY handicap parking law is written. So NO, one cannot even STOP a car in a handicapped space without having the proper placard/tag.
The ONLY exception in FL is this; " (3) Any person who is chauffeuring a person who has a disability is allowed, without need for a disabled parking permit or a special license plate, to stand temporarily in any such parking space, for the purpose of loading or unloading the person who has a disability. A penalty may not be imposed upon the driver for such temporary standing."

The law is clear, if you don't have a plate/placard, you don't even stop your vehicle in that space.

It would behoove you to actually know the laws before making incorrect statements regarding them. Yes she was illegally parked, and in the wrong.

She did. She even admitted to speaking with him first.

She did. She even admitted to speaking with him first.

@FormulaZR incorrect assumption. Many precincts have a program that will allow citizens to send pictures of vehicles that park illegally in handicap spaces so that they can ticket the offenders. Doesn't require being an officer.

@Gioconda self-defense, Florida is a stand your ground law state, meaning no duty to retreat and justification for deadly force when someone assaults you. (as always with the law, it depends on the situation, but the law reads "right to use reasonable force" applying it to this case, Drejka was on the ground after being assaulted, he would've been justified legally had he not spoken to police and let his lawyer use the law for his defense).

@Gioconda How did he know that Markeis didn't have a weapon and wasn't taking cover to fire back?

@Gioconda Why shoot in the heart? Because we are trained to aim for center mass.

@Gioconda Why shoot in the heart? Because we are trained to aim for center mass.

@Jésus S Killing isn't necessarily illegal, murder is. If someone attacks you and you take their life in self defense it is a justified killing, not murder. Intent is a necessary component.

@Zono It would've been ruled justified had he let his lawyer do the talking.

@Zono It would've been ruled justified had he let his lawyer do the talking.

@Mansnotprot You were correct. @fistsaidtotheface is incorrect.

@Mansnotprot You were correct. @fistsaidtotheface is incorrect.

No, that’s was very obviously implied in the video and I doubt anyone missed it

No, that’s was very obviously implied in the video and I doubt anyone missed it

@FormulaZR that's everybody... Everyone git bad attitudes... Delusions of being bigger and badder than the situation or life requires... And usually its been found to be true that these incidents require several Narsacistic and deluded personallities to transpire.. One side will argue they have the right to physically assault someone because of words they over heard... In this case it seems that it indeed is the case.. To prevent being shot in this senario or shooting someone lets walk through it to see what's causing the event to unfold and willingly manifest... Did anyone have to assault someone physically here.??... Did someone physically assault someone??.. Did the assault seem justified as a defensive act??.. Is tge shooting required?? Is the use of a firearm justified by law and by threat???... Is there a history of threat to harm physically a valid reaction??.. If the verbal arguments didn't involve the shooter initiating a physical threat verbally or physically than depending on state or county laws he is within his rights to announce his firearm as a defensive weapon if there is a threat made verbally or physically by other parties involved... Meaning if one person isn't making threats to harm or in any way hurt or kill in the space or duration of a verbal argument and another party is threatening physical harm to body or property either in the moment or as a promusary threat of intention than a verbalized announcement of intent to defend ones life is legal.. And it is the instigating threat if violence death or bodily harm that is seen as the guilty or offending party... Meaning arguments can be had over parking spaces without threatening to harm someone... But physically assaulting someone like we see in the video is not legal and can be seen as intent to do all the things criminally people have problems with... If one person says anything about harming another or states intent to kill before the mention of a gun then it is the original offense of threat physically that isn't justifiable with physical assault...  That's self defense law..

@Dave Baton do these confrontations involve people threatening him with physical violence when hes only verbally confronting others???... And is he justified or within his rights like everyone else to take part in verbal discorse without a need for physical violence until a threat is made to harm him or someone else??.....

Hall Monitor syndrome. Probably wanted to be a cop, probably couldn't do it. It's the same issue plaguing the "bad" cops.

@Gioconda I agree.. He knew what he was doing... Training kicks in... I do kniw that.. But training gets amendments as you survive and watch others die... It looked to me like the guy that got shot was all pumped up to make some hurt on the other guy until the defensive weapon was out . fear yes comes next for both... Could you imagine surviving war just to come home to be snuffed out by some jerk off wanna be bad boy??? Out to flex on you??.. Over a verbal argument involving parking issues???...   Arent you mad that this was part of what at least one black male thought was appropriate actions???.. I am... And im only black by association...

@CatRoxy86 Right..not because of their actions.

@CatRoxy86 Right..not because of their actions.

@Paul Burke as I said before,he was in the military. I don't know what u exactly do in there(I've never been in the military) but the thing that I'm certain is that it's not easy to get in. this kind of experience he all have been practicing it. So what I'm saying here is that he knew what he was doing,and instead of hurting him badly he decided to kill him. There's no justification in that. I wouldn't have said all this if he was a person without an experience in this kind of things. Secondly,no one is in right to kill another human being.

@Gioconda I think life shows us different... I think one man chose to violently assault another.. Blindsided... While you or Someone else would have done differently the fact is we werent there.. We arent the one being attacked...i think he was within his rights to shoot due to the nature of which he was assaulted.. Meaning no reason for the initial assault or physical violence.. The driving force and motive seem to me to be reckless..ill advised..unsane... As if there was no concern or discerning of threat requiring actual violence... Meaning psychotic... The treat to life still exists... Bottom line...irrational actions of violence shouldnt be given leanancy in a defense... The psychotic assault is enough to warrent defense of individual life and liberty with deadly force...

@Paul Burke I'm sorry, I don't understand. Even though u were so scared that u would pull a gun,if u saw him retreating (almost) no one would have took a life for nothing. He could have pull the gun then,Seeing him retreating, he could have said a simple" Come any closer and I will shoot",or I don't know.. ANYTHING. And there's the fact that,as we know,he was in the military so he knows what he's doing and where he is shooting...so why the heck shoot him in heart?? I'm talking about an experienced man here. Why not,as the lawyer said, in the foot or In the shoulder,in one of his leg ??? I don't know...I mean I think it's better Hurt him than kill him. If someone with no experience at all(about shooting a gun) was that scared to shoot him in a pretty deadly/dangerous place,he still wouldn't shoot him in the heart because he isn't capable of (the black man was walking/moving,so if u really have no experience is really hard to shot him straight in the heart) .

@Jesus Valdez do u know how many people do that right?..

@Jesus Valdez do u know how many people do that right?..

@Jesus Valdez I think that u don't really have the right to say what's wrong or not,because it will always be your opinion,and what is right for u can be the opposite for another. Anyway,I think that if they swap places (the black man shot the white man) we wouldn't be here talking about it..

Very VALID. CLOWN is a terrific word for that punk.

Very VALID. CLOWN is a terrific word for that punk.

@Gioconda I hear you... Its full of aggravated intent and action on both sides... Plenty of personal choice.. The problems arise because at least in my mind is that while one person may shy away from a gun in hand like they don't want to get shot it doesnt mean its ever over.  In fact its often just begining... And it can be an ongoing issue for all people involved... I think fear of those conciquences caused a man to shoot another...consider why one man physically assaults tge other and that could be a deciding factor in pulling the trigger... Sane people don't attack others over a verbal argument... He may have thought if I don't he will just attack k me later when my gun is concealed and my back is turned.. Clearly it wasnt an issue debated for long in regards to the initial assaulter because he assaulted an unaware individual.. How many people have died from being blindsided and punched?? Plenty... No gun or weapon doesnt mean the assault isn't deadly... I tho k he shot the man because he was afraid for his life... An attack liie this is quite jarring.. Sudden.. The choice to shoot looked like he paused and decided that the assault was enough no matter the manner of retreat.. Ive been tge victim of a senseless physical assault..  Not committing to my iwn defense has left me with a tbi and has stolen aspects of my personality... If I had followed through in my own defense ID at least not be burdened with a disabling reminder... Uf Soneone assaults you your best to just defend yourself fully.   Its not worth it to allow the resulting issues from giving the assaulter the bennifit of doubt... Because some people don't stop until you or someone else stops them.. With a bullet or fist.. In this case the man whom was assaulted his disadvantage is his size.. Strength and his inability to have seen the threat until it was assaulting him and then the further steps past the assault to further the intimidation and threat... I say justified... Hell have to disappear fir his protection...

@Paul Burke yeah...but that doesn't explain why he shot him though..

I mean,I perfectly agree with what u said,but still he illegally parked too and shot a man that was retreating..

He was disabled he was in the army get ya facts straight before using the race card

@Giocondapeople I know own a buisness here in town.. People are always parking in handicap spots in front if his store.. He tells them to move 4 a few reasons... A. Police will ticket you.
B. Handicap people require those spots.
C. Open your eyes.. Wake up.. Don't be a Dick to handicap people..

@Mansnotprot ...and use the bathrooms, elevators, ticket lines, transit seats, et al.

@Deshra Dine All parking spaces in front are closer to entrance. I'm handicapped. She was in the car, as allowed by law, and could move out, if needed.

The last thing the comment section has done is ignore that

The last thing the comment section has done is ignore that

@Gioconda and the guy who shoved him to the ground wasnt seeking trouble?

@Gioconda and the guy who shoved him to the ground wasnt seeking trouble?

@Master Dodger ah yes, as if that excuses manslaughter.

@Master Dodger ah yes, as if that excuses manslaughter.

are we also gonna ignore the fact that someone assaulted another human being for...getting angry at their wife...?

@FistSaidToTheFace Hmm I did not know about that. I would like to apologize for my previous comments then.<br>Thank you for informing me on that.

@FistSaidToTheFace Hmm I did not know about that. I would like to apologize for my previous comments then.
Thank you for informing me on that.

The problem is, is that she wasn't illegally parked in the first place. handicap spaces have the same law as fire zones: you can park in them as long as the driver is in the car and can get out of the way if needed, which is why the detective asked him around 16:30 if the car was running. She literally did nothing wrong.

@Gioconda me being a good person would approach the vehicle and tell them that they parked in a handicap spot without a tag, and hope that they respond nicely rather than start yelling at me.

@Mansnotprot And?? Nobody said they wasnt breaking the law, but ultimately their actions didn't put anyone life in danger. That's like saying jay walking is as bad as 1st degree murder. No matter if his intentions were good, the killer can't just go around acting like he can enforce laws as he pleases: he's not being paid to be a recognized figure of the public that knows & enforces laws. His initial confrontation can be seen as harrassment, doesnt mean I can try and arrest him for it. Harping on what the victims did just distracts from the fact that the killer should've just called police instead of acting like he is.

@Mansnotprot what are you trying to say with that comment?

@Mansnotprot what are you trying to say with that comment?

@Gordoarturo69 dunno..you(and I ) weren't in the scene so..

@Gordoarturo69 dunno..you(and I ) weren't in the scene so..

The difference in that is that one is enforceable and one is not. One inconveniences average people, the other does a lot more than inconvenience people who already have it hard enough.

I think it’s more for the fact that they were in the handicap stop and not the fact that it’s illegally parked

@Gioconda nah those windows weren't tinted he saw she was black don't play yourself even from far you can tell....

@Gioconda He wanted and was looking for trouble.

@Gioconda He wanted and was looking for trouble.

nah its every other comment saying that lol

nah its every other comment saying that lol

@CatRoxy86 actually,he approached the car not knowing the fact that the woman was black so I think he could have done that to anyone. He just wanted to seek for trouble..

@CatRoxy86 so what? He's another potential killer off the streets

@CatRoxy86 so what? He's another potential killer off the streets

It’s what racists do. Berating black people just for the sake of it.

It’s what racists do. Berating black people just for the sake of it.


This is America
Don't catch you slippin' now
Don't catch you slippin' now
Look what I'm whippin' now
This is America
This is what this case remember me


the cops were so nice to this guy to keep him talking and make him comfortable. if the the cops were aggressive with him he probably would have asked for a lawyer.. they did a great job..

@Lloyd Cipher He got 20 years for manslaughter, I think. Not a slap on the wrist (although he did hurt his wrist in the assault, apparently) 😁

@0 0 Everyone should demand a lawyer to be present, 'deserving' or not.

Reading someone their right should be interpreted as "do you want a lawyer? Because here's the part where we incriminate you." So many people disregard their rights n sign away like it's the check at the end of a meal.

Southern Soul I have to agree. No one should talk to the police without a lawyer, regardless of the situation/innocence/guilt....

TRUMP 2020-FOREVER  And did you notice the victim was already backing off? This doesn't appear to be self-defence.....

TRUMP 2020-FOREVER So if the dead victim was your loved one, you'd want the shooter to be pardoned?

@Southern Soul how did this get any likes. No defense lawyer would have got him off. From a criminal justice lawyer

@pyluts 2 there has to be people who defends the bad guy as hard as they can, just in case things were more complicated than it appears to be.<br>not a big deal for us who watch, just another fucked up guy better throw him in prison anyways, but no it's still a life on the line

@pyluts 2 there has to be people who defends the bad guy as hard as they can, just in case things were more complicated than it appears to be.
not a big deal for us who watch, just another fucked up guy better throw him in prison anyways, but no it's still a life on the line

@Southern Soul i see you're getting targeted by everybody for defending the guy though you're just saying what he should have done FOR HIMSELF and to save himself and not what he should have done for justice

i usually watch that part of the video but i couldnt watch it this time, he took a mans life but it feels like he got a slap on the wrist

@DoyouknowJOGIJOGI? you know there’s plenty of lawyers who defend killers, rapists, pedos because it’s their job? have you seen the other video of a lawyer smiling after getting a Mom who drowned her daughter a Not Guilty verdict? while completely morally wrong, it’s their job

@Southern Soul a lawyer would tell him to say nothing at all to anyone.

@Southern Soul Nah it's on video, you can't initiate a confrontation and then kill someone when they react to you shit talking their wife and children.

@Southern Soul lol no he would go to prison all day guy

@Ichinek I don’t think he’s defending him he’s just making the point that with the correct legal team this guy could’ve gotten away with murder

@Southern Soul too bad you weren’t there to save your brethren

@DoyouknowJOGIJOGI? No, I'm not a defense lawyer, something he never had.

@Southern Soul do not tell me ur trying to defend this guy and justify his actions wtf?

He should have asked for a lawyer. Any decent lawyer worth their salt would have had the charges dismissed before ever going before a jury. The lawyer would have instantly pointed out that the moment of "hesitation" before firing was caused by disorientation from falling so violently.


As a disabled veteran with handicap plates on my vehicle, it is a pet peeve of mine as well when people take up ADA handicap designated parking without proper plates or placards, but I wouldn't shoot someone over it. Even if the gentleman pushed me down, I'd just call the cops and press charges for the assault. It was wrong for that guy to shove the shooter down, but that definitely wasn't an "eye for an eye" situation. The shooter was definitely in the wrong for shooting that man.

@boozoochamp Like I said here before, where I'm from its allowed to stay for 3min almost everywhere while sitting in the car. So don't speak about ridiculousness and tell me I get a ticket😅
It's ridiculous that you think I'm doing this to provoke someone. Sometimes it's just the best option. I'll give you a little example perhaps you guys calm down then a little bit since you all seem to have a huge lack of fantasy.
In front of the doctor, where my mom has to go on regular basis just to get a new recipe... So it usually doesn't take longer than the magical 3 mins, which are allowed to stay on a disabled spot while sitting in the car. (Again: Where I'm from🤦♂😅)
I do it and it's perfectly fine. My mom isn't the youngest woman anymore and I can't go in for her. There has never ever been a salty situation l. Never. Cause everytime a car arrives you'll just leave immediately. This means the disabled person who wants to park has to wait approximately 5-10seconds till I parked out. If this is behaving like an asshole when I'm staying in every rule and law there is, than I'm guilty of being an asshole. But again there has never been a aggressive or stressful situation for anyone. Perhaps it's also the people here without guns and much more respect for each other than in the US I don't know. But here the people are not that aggressive in general. The least of them here could even imagine to kill someone to defend themselves cause there is no need for that. I think the people here are just much more realistic and calm compared to you in the US.

The dude wouldn't have even confronted the car if he wasn't carrying a gun. He was looking for trouble.

The dude wouldn't have even confronted the car if he wasn't carrying a gun. He was looking for trouble.

@Litzalocks the rest of the world shouldn't have to make your life easier. We didn't make you disabled. Improvise adapt and overcome.

@Litzalocks the rest of the world shouldn't have to make your life easier. We didn't make you disabled. Improvise adapt and overcome.

@Upshit Downshit More like an eye for an eyelash.

@Upshit Downshit More like an eye for an eyelash.

Violence causes Violence, don't push people!

Violence causes Violence, don't push people!

@Luuk Where I'm from, and I'm happy it's not America, it's allowed to stay 3 min on almost every spot even if parking isn't allowed there. This short period disturbs nobody and requires your attention to keep an eye on the road...so yes I think I would see it. Anyway in my home country are that much disabled parking spots that this situation never ever occurred.

@Milos Korenev I don’t know about that. Being pushed to the ground when you don’t expect it really gets your adrenaline going, the fight or flight reaction takes over.

im not handicapped and that's my biggest pet peeve too i hate when i see people parked in blue parking spaces, but I've never seen one. I've also heard police respond just as fast to illegal handicapped parking don't understand why he took into his own hands except he's a psychopath.

@JWD It's the reality people live with. No use denying it.

@JWD It's the reality people live with. No use denying it.

@Milos Korenev Sombody always gotta play the race card.

@Milos Korenev Sombody always gotta play the race card.

If I was a disabled vet I'd probably draw too, but he clearly backed off after that. There was no reason to shoot except bad judgement. Hard to comment though since I've never been in the military, or pushed down in public, or get annoyed enough to make a scene about some asshole's parking.

@Fluse Int. Sure, you could be guarding the parking lot and drive away as soon as you see someone, but I highly doubt you're paying that much attention. So why not just park in a normal spot like the rest of us? There's no reason not to.

@EXCUSE ME? There is no problem if you don't block it.

@EXCUSE ME? There is no problem if you don't block it.

@Epicriku91 It wasn’t a good reason, but it’s a great topic to talk about. Just cuz what happened wasn’t right, doesn’t mean that the victim’s family was spotless clean as well.

@Fluse Int. Bruh, why don’t you get it? Just literally don’t park there. What the hell, it’s for their convenience. You just don’t wanna back down huh, literally everyone is agreeing with the disabled spot not being for everyone.

I mean the guy was yelling at his wife while all his kids were in the car, I’m not a father but I’m sure that anyone would get defensive of their family in that situation.

@Fluse Int.Because i highly doubt you're moving away for every car. Why can't you just park in a normal spot like the rest of us?

@Fluse Int.Because i highly doubt you're moving away for every car. Why can't you just park in a normal spot like the rest of us?

@JungHoseok Slays many of them sound like the guy who shot someone over the parking spot... It's insane 😅

@JungHoseok Slays many of them sound like the guy who shot someone over the parking spot... It's insane 😅

@boozoochamp Standing there and sitting in the car so that you can leave immediately causes no harm and no trouble. This is ridiculous.

@adsffdaaf Because white americans have been conditioned for centuries to perceive blackness as inherently threatening. Which is horrifying, lest you misunderstand me.

When the guy backed up after pulling the gun, that could have been enough. Don't shoot the guy geez

When the guy backed up after pulling the gun, that could have been enough. Don't shoot the guy geez

@Rowan Thomas gun control won't work most countries that implemented it have ended up with worse problems such as higher gun violence/more tyranny in the government Venezuela (I think) or a increase in knife attacks in the case of Britain or people won't turn in guns at all such as Norway in some place like Australia it does work. Also situations like these don't happen in the U.S. only you just watch news from the U.S. more than you do other countries

@Rowan Thomas that’s not going to happen any time soon, seen as the government of texas has allowed that anyone can have a gun.

@Rowan Thomas that’s not going to happen any time soon, seen as the government of texas has allowed that anyone can have a gun.

@Rowan Thomas "Self defense" on a fleeing assailant has always been murder, doesn't matter what tool is used.

@Rowan Thomas "Self defense" on a fleeing assailant has always been murder, doesn't matter what tool is used.

@Milos Korenev I bet your black arnt you. I live in London and have been stabbed 3 times. Dosnt mean I carry a knife. I stand my ground and fight. I box travellers often. I don’t often win. But we both walk together with open palms and fight like a man

@Rowan Thomas It can't realistically be done. There were just 3 army personnel charged in connection to a huge gun supply ring. Military weapons being stolen and sold on blackmarket inside the US. It will only raise the value of weapons and ammunition and for years only the law abiding citizens will suffer for it, as always. As long as police and military have weapons, they will make their way to the criminals. Are you for diisarming the police? Honest question

Granted the family shouldn't have parked in the disabled spot, but I can understand why given that she had several young kids who can be a handful at times.

Nor should the father shoved the guy for harassing his wife about it. But there was no justification for shooting him after he'd spread his hands and stepped back several times.

As a person with a three digits IQ, I figured out he shiot the dude over physical assaults (that was to be followed by a beat up on the ground), and not over the plate

@Litzalocks he didn’t deserve to die over a handicapped spot though it’s like literally not that serious I understand that it’s a jerk move but like you can’t just go around shooting people he was arguing with a woman and her husband came over and pushed him away because he was probably being aggressive and he shoots him like he didn’t even need to shoot him even if he pulled out his gun he purposely shot him while the dude was backing away from him that dude just wanted to kill somebody

@Diego  Done control with and work here in America not because of how many guns they already are...... But because it's already so much gun control laws anyways that people just don't realize.  Clearly Michael  Not have the shoot that guy for getting stuff down but it is justified that if he was being attacked that he was able to pull out his gun. Crazy thing is though is if he didn't have ACWP which is a license to carry a fire arm which I do have then  He was carrying a gun illegally... Which is against the law.... Unless of course this is a open carry  State

@Epicriku91 no one is saying that it’s a good reason to shoot someone just because they parked in a handicap spot. If this dude has health problems, he’s not going to want to get into a physical fight. This dude told her to move and that it was wrong and immediately she’s like let me get my man. He gets shoved and he’s already in a bad position defensively. He should’ve pulled his gun and not shot but if the dude was going to keep coming with him on the ground in a terrible position to defend himself then yeah I can see someone getting shot for that. The guy shouldn’t have shoved him just for talking to his girl about parking in a handicap parking spot illegally. Like seriously look at both sides of the ridiculousness here. Drejka shouldn’t have shot, but he also shouldn’t have gotten shoved either.

@Fluse Int. Bruh I don’t know where you are from but parking in a handicap stop is definitely illegal, definitely not ok and it’s usually the most expensive ticket you can receive from police. It’s more expensive than parking in a fire/emergency Lane.

Two wrongs don't make a right after all.

Two wrongs don't make a right after all.

@Litzalocks i park where I please. Most people who have handicap permissions are fat. They can use the exercise

@Litzalocks i park where I please. Most people who have handicap permissions are fat. They can use the exercise

@Rowan Thomas you think people in America would give back their guns?

@Rowan Thomas you think people in America would give back their guns?

Well they were parked there for literally two minutes .... some people just have a problem with minding their own business

Well they were parked there for literally two minutes .... some people just have a problem with minding their own business

@Diego one word Australia. It can be done. It might be be easy because of what everyone is used to, but like I said, Australia did it, so it can be done.

@Milos Korenev bc they are more likely to commit a violent act? seems racist....

@Milos Korenev bc they are more likely to commit a violent act? seems racist....

As a non disabled regular guy I feel the same way.

As a non disabled regular guy I feel the same way.

@Fluse Int. ur not in the right. But going up to someone and fighting them in a parking lot about it is not ok. I would just assume they are a asshole and move on.

@Rowan Thomas sadly gun control wouldn’t really work in America since they already have so many guns. It really only works if a country does it before they have a lot of guns in circulation

@Litzalocks I'm the reason for disabled person getting their life harder and I don't respect them cause I park in a disabled spot while sitting in the car and leaving immediately as soon as another car arrives? You're insane

@Litzalocks Don't assume they need to ask me🤦♂ I'll leave immediately as soon someone arrives... It's absolutely OK and I never had any problems with any kind of aggression or even a bad look.
and yes, you sound aggressive. If this I your normal behavior I know why you can't see this...cause it's normal for you.
I said where I'm from. Where could you know where this is and how it's handled here? 😅🤦♂

@Litzalocks Get yourself a drink and calm down🤦♂😅 your aggression is ridiculous and would probably lead to the same situation we saw here.
I see no problem in parking in a disabled spot, as long as I'm in the car and can get away immediately when a disabled person arrives.
My point was that the disabled parking spot was further away than the ordinary ones which makes no sense. So if I couldn't walk that good I'd prefer to take a spot closer to the door.
Where I'm from disabled parking spots are the ones that are closest to the door and that by law....

I think we all know what he really felt threatened by. It wasn't being pushed to the ground - it was being pushed by a black man. No amount of backing away could have altered that perception.

How bout gun control. It's a serious problem in the US. A person got killed here and he's not even sorry one bit and worried about his injured arm and his family. Like dude you just killed a father in front of his kids for absolutely no reason. We didn't hear the argument but Marquist saw Michael being 'aggressive' with his wife and arguing and shoved him as a 'wtf get away from my wife and kids' reaction. Seriously though GUN CONTROL! Cause these situations only happen in the US.

I’m sure you wouldn’t yell at a woman in a parking lot either! Of course the boyfriend would’ve felt protective over her, with some random strange man yelling at her in front of their kids. No excuse for what he did at all.

The funny thing is that the Ada designated parking slot was further away from the entrance than the normal parking area 🤪 to say anything to the woman parking further away would be stupid af.

i can understand drawing a firearm after the initial shove to the ground, but once the guy saw the gun, he backed off. thats when Michael here should have put his gun away and called the police.


Not the brightest potato peel in the compost heap


Watching the interview the only thing I’m thinking is this guy has no consideration or no thoughts about the possible consequences or ramifications of his actions. I’m not talking jail time, I’m talking about the possibility of ruining someone’s life, or ending it or both. In this instance he’s ended 1 and ruined 4. Yet at no point in the interview did he put any thought into it, even when he said he heard someone shout “my kids”.

Edit: it also sounds like this was one of those situations where a lawyer would not have just been good but great. A lawyer would have actually been the difference between jail and walking free. Glad he didn’t get one coz I know that dad didn’t deserve being shot let alone murdered.

@Scott Jackson he wasn't innocent, he was guilty.  It is very clear.  And at no stage does he ever show "realization that he made a mistake".  He shows zero remorse.  He has a record for threatening to shoot people.

Dogald Trump I think the guy realizes he made a mistake in the heat of the moment, but that’s why this is a manslaughter charge. It’s why you shouldn’t look for confrontation without being trained in how to deal with it, because even if you’re innocent your life will be hell for a bit as you get cycled through the justice system.

Dogald Trump people aren’t saying he’s not responsible for his actions the black dude that is. We’re just saying you don’t murder people because you get pushed over that’s common sense

Loralei Jessick imagine a world where people don't go around inciting violence just because they're bored off their asses

You talk about lives ruined and lost, but imagine a world where the first person to introduce violence into a non violent situation was shot and killed.  EVery.  Time.

There would be many less lives lost and ruined once we cut out those weeds from society.

mike h doubt that would’ve helped much. Other guy was actively looking to cause problems and would have found another excuse. Moreover, if it wasn’t this dad, it would’ve been someone else soon

How does it work in America? 100.000 dollar and he got released after a month? How he get his hands on that amount?

This man was berating a woman for foolishness, he absolutely initiated the whole issue. Verbally abusing someone is a violent act. Furthermore he is a man doing this to a woman. Wtf - he had done this previously and pulled a gun on other people including a mother and children. He was looking for trouble, had that woman asserted herself a certain way he would have likely shot her.

@Green Anon I missed the "and then turn around and walk away" part of your amazing example. Why exactly would you randomly smack someone and then walk away? How am I supposed to answer such a ridiculous question in the first place? I mean I wouldn't start chasing you to smack you back but I certainly would be shouting "what the fuck was that for"?! The conflict in the video wasn't just a random shove, there was a reason behind it and the dude obviously wasn't aiming to continue the fight or he would've been on him and kicking him immediately, not slowing to a stop and adjusting his pants like we see in the video. So I'm sure the "fight" could've stopped right there and it DEFINITELY could've stopped once the pistol was out and both the black dude and the white dude on the sidewalk take multiple steps away from it.

@SpydersByte "No, but"..."I would consider the conflict ended and I would drive away." Do you want to try again and get your story straight?

@Yasin Syed He was definitely looking for trouble and was wishing one day to use the "self defense" card

@Yasin Syed Exact conversation I was looking for. The guy should have never pushed him on the ground. But does that justify shooting someone? I don't think so. Also like you said and its obvious, as soon as he pulled out his handgun the incident was immediately neutralized.

@Green Anon or would you rather I killed you for smacking me?

@Green Anon no, but if you smacked me in the face and then I drew my gun and you backed off then I would consider the conflict ended and I would drive away. You kinda forgot the whole gun part eh?

@SpydersByte So if I smack you in the face and then turn around and walk away you're just going to get in your car and drive away?

If you're immediate reaction to somebody calling you out for taking somebody's handicap spot is violence then you SHOULD be put down. You have no place in polite society

UncleBourbon Imagine typing multiple paragraphs of nonsensical, video game character tier speculation

harrod19 he didn’t “smash” anyone. He pushed the guy away who was being verbally aggressive towards his family. In no way does that justify the gun being fired. Maybe a fist fight? Maybe just drawing the gun? But to fire it directly at him was uncalled for

He did destroy himself with the statement about he doesn’t need to shoot if he want coming forward.

I don’t think he would have walked free but his lawyer probably could have convinced people to go easy on him if were for the lies and calloused statements.

harrod19 Getting shot is more than “a smack back”. Sure he shouldn’t have pushed him but if you hear loud yelling and come out to see a dude in your girls face you’re probably not thinking too straight. A push is not punishable by death.

@Yasin Syed If someone was yelling at my wife and kids I would yell at him, not shove him into the pavement.
That doesn't mean Drejka was justified in killing him, of course, but the dead dude initiated the violence when it was previously not on the table.

If you want to imagine being in anyone's position, imagine being in Drejka's position, where you're arguing with an obtuse woman who has violated the law and essentially disrespected the disabled, which you consider yourself to be, greatly inconveniencing you all the while, and you are stricken to the pavement from behind without any warning or hints of violence. You get your gun out to face your assailant, and you see him move. You've just been thrown to the pavement; is he moving towards you or away from you? If he's moving towards you, do you have time to tell before he's upon you and swipes your gun from you?
In hindsight we can tell the dead guy was moving away from him, but if you've just been thrown to the ground unexpectedly when adrenaline is already high, and are responding to an attacker, movement is movement.

Again, I don't think Drejka was justified in a hindsight 20/20 scenario where everyone has a built in Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System and can slow down time to see what exactly the threat is while also distancing yourself emotionally from the engagement, but in regards to what went down I think it was tricky and unfortunate.
However, this tricky and unfortunate situation was entirely brought on by the dead dude, who initiated violence when it was not necessary, even emotionally. The natural response to shouting is to shout back, not to assault someone from behind.

@Yasin Syed exactly, once the gun was brought out the conflict was basically ended. He could've gotten back in his car and drove away, there was no need to actually fire. The dude was definitely not engaging with him at that point. Of course that being said, he shouldn't have shoved him to the ground in the first place. They both overreacted but the push definitely wasn't going to kill someone, the bullet did.

@harrod19 it's beyond clear that he didn't need to shoot the gun because the moment he pulled it out the other guy distanced himself from him. He could've easily put an end to the situation (a situation he deliberately started), but chose to shoot him instead. It's also beyond clear that the armed dude was one of dem wannabe 'Murican heroes looking for an excuse to shoot someone because he stopped and parked illegaly in order to start a heated (and hostile) argument with a stranger over something that didn't concern him, and got the response he wanted when the other guy pushed him after being provoked when he yelled at his girlfriend. Anyone in their right mind would've come to the same conclusion: the use of deadly force was unjustified no matter how you look at it, and he escalated the whole thing because he deliberately wanted to. Also, he already had a record. Don't try to defend the undefendable. <br>In fact, according to the evidence, if anyone had a reason to escalate the situation and whose actions might be justified, it was the black dude. He saw his girlfriend being yelled at by a stranger in a hostile manner and did what he felt was necessary to protect her. Many more people would buy this narrative over the other, basically because it seems to be true.

@harrod19 it's beyond clear that he didn't need to shoot the gun because the moment he pulled it out the other guy distanced himself from him. He could've easily put an end to the situation (a situation he deliberately started), but chose to shoot him instead. It's also beyond clear that the armed dude was one of dem wannabe 'Murican heroes looking for an excuse to shoot someone because he stopped and parked illegaly in order to start a heated (and hostile) argument with a stranger over something that didn't concern him, and got the response he wanted when the other guy pushed him after being provoked when he yelled at his girlfriend. Anyone in their right mind would've come to the same conclusion: the use of deadly force was unjustified no matter how you look at it, and he escalated the whole thing because he deliberately wanted to. Also, he already had a record. Don't try to defend the undefendable.
In fact, according to the evidence, if anyone had a reason to escalate the situation and whose actions might be justified, it was the black dude. He saw his girlfriend being yelled at by a stranger in a hostile manner and did what he felt was necessary to protect her. Many more people would buy this narrative over the other, basically because it seems to be true.

@harrod19 without sound its hard to say. Imagine being in his position, coming out of a store and seeing some random dude shouting at your wife/kids. On top of that he didn't pull out any weapons himself and just like the police and everyone else said the guy was actually retreating the moment he recognised a gun was being drawn. At that moment the dude on the floor can't claim self defence as the presence of a gun had basically eliminated any threat without actually needing to be fired

Meh, dead dude was the only one to introduce violence. They're both stupid, but you start swinging for any reason you'd better expect to be smacked back.


The lady’s face behind the defense attorney saying “One man is already gone, do we want to take another mans life away” is accurate. That attorney was ridiculous!

I thought that attorney was going to start crying at one point.

I cringed so hard I lost feeling in my neck.

@Zamerus People tend to forget that defense lawyers are required to defend their client regardless of how defensible the client is. An attorney's not an asshole for being on the "wrong side," there has to be a defense to test the merit of the prosecution's case. Sometimes there's no convincing argument to make, but you can't just pull an <i>...And Justice For All</i> and proclaim your own client "should go right to fuckin' jail."

@Zamerus People tend to forget that defense lawyers are required to defend their client regardless of how defensible the client is. An attorney's not an asshole for being on the "wrong side," there has to be a defense to test the merit of the prosecution's case. Sometimes there's no convincing argument to make, but you can't just pull an _...And Justice For All_ and proclaim your own client "should go right to fuckin' jail."

He had a really difficult case to defend. The video said it all, there was enough time to realize that the aggressor was backing off and not a threat anymore and there ain't no way you're gonna defend your way outta that.

Meh, I don't know I thought he was doing ok. Hitting the patriotic notes, and yada yada. You never know, he might snag a sympathetic juror. Seriously though, there are worse defenses, the Twinkie defense for one. I think the real tragedy here is his tie.

The defense attorney calling him “the REAL victim” was even more ridiculous. I’m sure the jury responded realllly well to that. That defense attorney is just atrocious!


This guy highlights the type of person we shouldn't let be a cop.

@Rat Terrier Dog Mom Nah, she was parked in a handicapped spot I think, and she isn't handicapped

Thomas Jefferson Wolfcall the woman was out of her car before the gun came out. Just FYI.

Rob Lena I am no fan of obnoxiously loud music coming from cars, but did I miss something? Was loud music a factor here?

also really highlights why allowing everyone to have a gun is a really really bad idea

Ah, yes, and the guy who pushed him highlights the type of person who doesn't know how NOT to escalate a situation

If you fuckin' attack someone expect to get attacked in return, if its a gun, sucks for you

@a nu start

Plain wrong.
The video shows that the wife has stepped out of the car and is standing in front of Drejka at the moment her husband pushes him. I think he was prompted to push Drejka away from his wife because he felt Drejka was threatening his wife, it's clear that voices are raised.  He didn't take a run and tackle Drejka, and he didn't punch Drejka. Do you think Drejka would've taken a step back if the husband had asked him nicely? I think the husband's actions were instinctive and the level of force proportionate. What happened afterwards was just 'revenge' from a scumbag who felt belittled and had had his 'authority' questioned. The husband was backing away when he pointed the gun. Cold-blooded murder.

Too bad we Don’t need em we got enough bad police around...

DancingOdie I actually don’t think he was railroaded. His response was disproportionate. He was the victim of a single push and there was no signal of anything further. No threats were made. Marquise wasn’t approaching him. So what exactly was he defending himself from?

A cop would have been exonerated. This man was in the right to defend himself. He should not have pulled the trigger but in that moment i feel hes still justified in his actions because you dont have years, months, weeks, days, hours, or even minutes to make heads or tails of whats going on. They railroaded this man

@a nu start Assault ...yes. Aggressive... definitely not. The attack wasn't even sustained it lasted a fraction of a second. Cars are not bulletproof so you can't say she was safe in the car.<br>This guy had a history of actively getting himself into confrontational situations and flashing his gun.  The actions of a fragile mind.

@a nu start Assault ...yes. Aggressive... definitely not. The attack wasn't even sustained it lasted a fraction of a second. Cars are not bulletproof so you can't say she was safe in the car.
This guy had a history of actively getting himself into confrontational situations and flashing his gun.  The actions of a fragile mind.

Oliver Heaviside that doesn’t matter. He defended his wife. A logical thing to do.

to be fair either of these guys being cops would probably end up the same, the guy who was killed here was no angel

People like this often try to become cops and fail so they just go around acting like cops anyway.


It would be interesting to see an interrogation of an innocent person to see how they would react. Like if the interrogator isn't professional or correct in the readings of body language and behavior of the person.

@Madi Meyer Thanks dude I recently subbed since it is only 1 usd

@mongopoju

There's two videos I know of that feature it but they're both Patreon only.

One is an interview of Michael Dixon, you can find the video link on their Patreon post "TMCPI (1-7)"
The video is called "Michael Dixon, Shayna Hubers, Thomas Chan"

The other is actually an anonymous sexual assault victim being sternly questioned by a detective who tries to get her to admit she is lying or embellishing details about the assault.
The video link is in their Patreon post called "The Most Compelling Police Interrogations Part 9"

@hambo Can you remember the name of the video?

hambo yeah the police talked about getting camera footage and the guy was like “Good, lets go see the camera footage”

I believe there was actually one on this channel but it looks like it's been moved to the Patreon. Forgot the name of the guy but they essentially lied about evidence to get him to admit to it and he never cracked and was found not guilty.


I did a little digging about Drejka after watching this video again (great content, btw!). Turns out, one of those previous incidents that JCS mentioned was at the same location, over the same dumb parking space issue. Ricky Kelly, a truck driver, alleged that Drejka threatened Kelly's life with a firearm and used racial slurs during the altercation. The owner of the store came out and threatened to call the police if Drejka didn't cut the shit, Drejka allegedly replied "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After that interaction, Drejka made a complaint to the company that Kelly drove for. In the recorded call saying that Kelly was "lucky I didn't blow his head off."

Drejka has done this bullshit song and dance before, throwing around his weight like the big boy he thinks he is only emboldened by the presence of a deadly weapon, with zero regard for the damage he could cause using it. He knew exactly what he was doing.

I did a little digging about Drejka after watching this video again (great content, btw!). Turns out, one of those previous incidents that JCS mentioned was at the _same location, over the same dumb parking space issue._ Ricky Kelly, a truck driver, alleged that Drejka threatened Kelly's life with a firearm and used racial slurs during the altercation. The owner of the store came out and threatened to call the police if Drejka didn't cut the shit, Drejka allegedly replied "I can't help myself, I keep getting myself into trouble." After that interaction, Drejka made a complaint to the company that Kelly drove for. In the recorded call saying that Kelly was "lucky I didn't blow his head off."

Drejka has done this bullshit song and dance before, throwing around his weight like the big boy he thinks he is only emboldened by the presence of a deadly weapon, with _zero_ regard for the damage he could cause using it. He knew _exactly_ what he was doing.

Agreed,  this would have worked in the 50s and 60s.

@Seth Hamm based on everything else people in the comments have added about his character. it really does makes sense, he had been looking for this opportunity to shoot someone. it took him 20 years to plan and try to find even the slightest of reason to pull out his firearm.

@Ninja Shogun You don't want to live in any bubble. Right, Left, or otherwise. If you want to see what a Leftist bubble looks like, go search "Rose Twitter." If you want to see what a Right Wing bubble looks like, watch this disabled guy humble-brag to police about killing a man while using stilted gun-magazine tacticool lingo.

@M Brown if he is living in a right wing bubble I would hate to see what ppl living in the left wing bubbles looks like

Drejka is probably salty he dropped out of mall cop basic training and spent his time fantasising about this.

And now he got assaulted in jail and doesn’t have his weapon to save his ass lol. Coward doesn’t know what to do now that he doesn’t have his gun to save him lmao.

Wow thanks for sharing. Good research friend! ✌

All the video evidence supports this a man who is defending himself wouldn’t shoot a man backing up he even backed up almost to the point of turning around completely and he still shot the guy, this was something he wanted to do for a long time the man wants a problem with anyone and in jail he’ll get plenty but won’t have a gun to hide behind.

I've heard the term 'lead confidence' before, how certain people will act knowing they are armed and usually when they are sure another person isn't.

If true, that makes sense. He dreamed of this for years. I suspect he lived in a right-wing bubble where he believed cops held different standards for some than others, and that he would be treated as a hero by them for exercising his 2nd amendment rights.  However, you can't go pick a fist-fight and then shoot a guy running away.  But he does have SOMETHING in common with heroes... the superpower of 'super healing.' He was in such pain he couldn't talk at the start but within minutes he was 100% fine.


Guys clearly traumatised from his time in the service - guy killed a lot of trees in his time man, and was severely wounded in a bonsai attack which left him stumped for life. As a Sapper myself, I treely understand his plight.

@rockstarJDP it's just too bad he had to draw xylem. It saps me down to my roots that a stick in the mud like dumb-ass Douglas here can cause such pain.

Weeping willow

@rockstarJDP I yes, I forgot he was a tree surgeon haha 😀

@silas frisenette he speaks and acts as though he's a military or police veteran, but his actual trade was as a tree surgeon so we're just ripping on him for acting like he knows what he's talking about 😅

@Mike Thomas it's a shame I was cut down in my prime

@Mike Thomas it leaves me thinking the same.

@fourstar fuel  I'd say you've if not topped at least equaled the OP. I salute you! lmao

I love this comment and all of the replies

mr scrumble was beaten to death by Blarf

I wonder if he's twigged that his conduct is logged with a criminal record that will never leaf him no matter how hard he tries to branch out. It's in his best interest to get to the root of the problem. I hope his therapist takes trunk calls now that he's in custody as  he's clearly barking mad.

@Scruffy Bones he should have just palmed them off really

He can't even relax at his favourite Vietnamese restaurant anymore because he just hears them speaking tree 😔

If only all youtube comment chains were like this

"Sapper" fuck that got me good. Nice word play.

@Christine Barry you were a worthy adversary. Good game 😉

@Christine Barry clearly your bark is worse than your bite. You need to root first and ask questions later (I'm seriously reaching now 😄)

@rockstarJDP oakee dokie but I don’t want yew to leaf!!

@Christine Barry stop your pineing! I live fir bad puns! Oakay though, I willowallow your request and give it a rest 😉


The fact that he said "thank you" to the officer after being informed he killed a man, a father, a husband in front of his family made me SCREAM. This man is absolutely vile.

he said thank you because he legit though " officer is white like me .. what could happen" .   and he thought "  did y'all a solid "


Imagine if this "defund the police" movement actually gets some ground and there's an armed vigilante like this man on every street corner.

We would all be dead dude acted like he got tackled n his poor elbow n wrist what a wimp and then said he was coming at him when the gun clearly made him back up. N the thing is if u wanna fuck someone up n u got to start off pushing like that u prob gonna charge immediately seemed like he just pushed the shit out of him but still a normal push not a running push even but just a push to say wtf u doing yelling at my wife not a im gonna fuck u up type of movements dude was backing up wtf manslaughter ?!??


Those closing arguments were terrible. Did he write them on the way in that morning?


Sad thing is there are literally 4 free parking spots when he arrived, 3 of which arguably closer to the entrance than the handicapped spot.

@Nate McCollum I don't get the point of your comment. Regardless of if the victim acted out of racial motivation, if he "assumed the worst" clearly he assumed right.

@Jim Jo only because of this??? How did you read this bit of his mind? Must be a billionaire fortune teller your capable self....

@nonni139 Have you considered that they might have had the placard, just not put it out? You don't need to be wheelchair-bound to be handicapped..

there were empty parking spaces on all sides of her.  assuming a handicapped person drove up they could just park in the next one over no fuss.  this dude was just looking for an excuse to get in a fight

@nonni139 the reason it happened is because the shooter was a psycho.

@sammygirl6910 probably should of went to a nicer gas station lol.

@Mitchell Monroe Dude who shot isn't handicapped. He's a he-karen. Should have minded his own business.

@Mitchell Monroe I feel the victim is a little more justified as there were children in the car.  I’m pretty sure race influenced both their actions, as a black man seeing a white man yelling at his family in a parking lot he thinks the worst… the shooter also was probably more scared because he is black.

Wether your racist or not- your perception of a threat is naturally increased if said threat is coming from somebody of a different race.  I believe studies have shown that this most apparent between black and white people, even if the threatened person is racist or not.

I couldn't help but think both of these men are at fault for their lack of being able to control their emotions. The homie shoving a handicap man over for his confrontation about the spot. Then Micheal responding with shooting him dead. Both unable to control themselves.

@carlo Wallee she didn't die for parking in the handicap spot

@nonni139 The reason all this happened was because a guy left his house, with his gun, looking for a reason to shoot someone.

@nonni139 the fact is this guy ONLY started anything because he had a gun and was ready to use it. His gun was his motivator, not the handicapped spot. I guarantee he wouldn’t have said anything to her had he not been hiding his gun. That’s what these guys do. They start trouble then when someone responds, they keep pushing until it gets physical. Then they can use their gun and claim “self defense”.

Sometimes handicap spots are not necessarily closest to the door, but closest to wheelchair accessibility.

@nonni139 yeah i’m pretty sure most people in this comment section agree that it’s wrong to take handicap spots if you don’t have a sticker, but that doesn’t justify being shot to death for. don’t know why you even bother bringing that up.

jesus dont like that im gay but satans cool w it

@nonni139 yeah I don't think you should get the death penalty for it tho

Its also sad that the couple didnt respect that it was a handicap parking spot.

It breaks my heart this happened to that poor family

The spot was easy to drive into and clearly shes still in the car. This dude was looking for trouble...

I know. For real. This guy acting like the driver sped into the last available handicapped parking spot to beat out another car with an actual placard. And even if this was the case, him shooting the man as he was backing off was way overboard.


Not sure if you're aware but there is a fake 'JCS' YouTube account which seems to have some of your videos on it, the profile picture is of a cat.


dude parks illegally to complain about someone parking illegally..

@Amy Mendez 15 minutes? More like 2 minutes.

@Amy Mendez 15 minutes? More like 2 minutes.

@Amy Mendez um I know you're Hispanic based on your last name your profile picture and the previous comments you have left...all very easy info to acquire simply by simply checking your public profile.

No illegal parking in a private lot actually with exception to ADA rules.

Dude is a coward but dude shouldn't have pushed him.

Dude is a coward but dude shouldn't have pushed him.

@Amy Mendez for what its worth I agree with you 100% that the response was totally disproportionate.

It was lazy and selfish parking in the disabled bay - especially  as there were other spaces.  Someone in a wheelchair needs extra space to get out of the car - and they can't get out to knock on the window and ask the person to move.  Annoying, but not the end of the world.

In no way whatsoever does it warrant a confrontation like that, and being murdered over it is sickening. I agree it wasn't malicious parking there, it was ignorant - and I should know, I'm paraplegic so I deal with this a lot.  I manage just fine without shouting at people and definitely haven't shot anyone.

dude pushes a dude into the ground for arguing with his wife

@G O A T never said they didn’t—but doesn’t apply to non-Afro latinx folks it’s mixed Latinx folks

@Amy Mendez Plus they got the extra cake privilege so stop it

@Amy Mendez Side note: Hispanic and latinas girls 125% have access to “white privilege”

@Amy Mendez Hi, actual disabled person here (paraplegic), while I don’t think anyone should have been killed for parking in the handicapped spot, they shouldn’t have parked there if they were not disabled. It’s not a “I’ll only be here for a minute” spot, it’s a spot specifically for those with disabilities. I’m sure you’re aware of that. The spots are bigger to allow for wheelchair users to be able to get out of our cars. We have no way of knowing if there was a disabled person watching her in her car waiting for her to leave so they could park there in order to go into the store. Able bodied people can literally go anywhere, the whole parking lot is yours aside from a few spaces, we unfortunately don’t have that luxury because of curbs/bad terrain/distance and whatever else. Again, her guy shouldn’t have been shot over it, but she shouldn’t have parked there. You defending her parking there because she wasn’t going to be there for long is straight up ableism, and I encourage you to listen to more disabled people on the issue because it’s something we deal with everyday. It’s very frustrating when the one spot we can access isn’t accessible for us because an able bodied person decided to be lazy.

@GothBoiClique someone’s triggered lmaoo

@GothBoiClique someone’s triggered lmaoo

@Amy Mendez bruh your name screams Hispanic, latino at the very least.

THAT'S WHAT I WAS SCREAMING IN MY MIND THE WHOLE TIME

THAT'S WHAT I WAS SCREAMING IN MY MIND THE WHOLE TIME

@Frank White I am always right because I’m intelligent & hot sf

Cop doubles the speed limit to catch the guy that's speeding.....

I don't see the point you're trying to make.

handicapped means something empty space that isn't a spot is damn near meaningless.

@Amy Mendez Wait are you talking about intelligence and education? Because that’s what “being cultured” means. If so, then white Americans are more cultured than most other races.

@mark still more cultured than all the white Americans combined

Doesnt matter it isnt his job to be policing dam parking spaces. What an azz..whole

And then he chooses to take someone’s life

And then he chooses to take someone’s life

@Taryn Thomas A normal person wouldn't park in a handicap spot in the first place, a normal person would park somewhere else if pointed out she is parked in a handicap spot, a normal person than wouldn't start a dispute when she is in the wrong especially with her children in the car, a normal person doesn't start immediately with a physical confrontation, definitely with his children in a car, and a normal person obviously doesn't shoot someone when pushed on the ground in front of the victim kids. There is no innocent person in this situation. One person is just way more horrible than the other two

That's how it goes down when a guy is Karen.

That's how it goes down when a guy is Karen.

@Cpt Dinosaur Parking in a handicap spot shouldn't put your life in danger.

why would someone care if someone parked illegaly thats so weird

@ng h No telling how many babies Karen's have aborted.🤣

@ng h No telling how many babies Karen's have aborted.🤣

He parked illegally to murder someone for parking illegally*

@A Gough MSM is not responsible for the term Karen, that was started by memes on the internet the news was just late like everything else

Karen bundle includes: not only mental pain but physical

Karen bundle includes: not only mental pain but physical

@A Gough just  because  a  bipoc is  privelaged  doesn’t mean  white  privelage  still  doesn’t  affect  them ..

hongpingmike by his logic, you would end up with a never ending line of people shooting each other forever.

@Daniel G wow. They were BOTH parking illegally, regardless, this shouldn't turn into an argument. I wouldn't be yelling at a mother in front of her kids to move their car unless I was disabled and sincerely needed that spot, its called minding your business. The husband would have taken less than 5 minutes to buy the snacks and they would have left peacefully. No one should have gotten shot over this. Husband was defending his wife against her aggressor.

@A Gough Because names have race exclusivity....... ok, Karen.

@Aussie Jules yeah I noticed it wasn’t the literal closest, but was the most convenient in terms of getting in and out—thanks for catching that & informing me about how that spot wasn’t even considered a proper handicap spot

@Daniel G bruh did you really copy paste the definition lmao

@Kim Berly what is this mess about do you know?

@Kim Berly what is this mess about do you know?

This is the most American thing I've ever seen unfortunately

@Daniel G you just used a reductio ad absurdum. Which even the narrator of this video said (in another video) that this kind of logic is used by guilty people. Not a good way of proving a point and makes you sound like the 5 year old

@Daniel G it’s only a problem when a disabled person needs the spot and the non-disabled person doesn’t leave from the spot. There were people waiting in the car so that seemingly means that they were only gonna stay there for a little bit & ready to leave.

@A Gough uh I never called u white tho? Also, how’d tf u know I’m hispanic

@Daniel G literally not at all lmao they were parked there probably no more than 15 minutes, making a big fuss about this when no other disabled person needed the spot at that time is the definition of a Karen tho

@Amy Mendez Privilege is an attitude not a colour.

@Amy Mendez Privilege is an attitude not a colour.

@A Gough let me guess, you think it’s racism? Lmao

@A Gough let me guess, you think it’s racism? Lmao


Amazes me how stupid his defense lawyer sounds...


He's like one of those "town guys" that likes to police everyone.

I remember this case. A lot of people under another video supportet the murderer.<br>Thats insane

I remember this case. A lot of people under another video supportet the murderer.
Thats insane

@Elle That's it: only discharge the weapon if you're trying to kill the attacker. All this 'shoot in the hand/leg' is bollocks.

@Accuser_of_the_Brethren Also, notice how he complains that "every day there's a car in the handicap spot "waiting for someone."' Like... maybe it's THEIR store too? Maybe they are there every day to shop, just like he is? But he never considers that, of course. Because he thinks that he's the protagonist & everyone else is a side character or antagonist, only acting in response to him.

@Chronospa i feel like he could have totally shot his knee or leg and still "neutralized the threat" or whatever he thought was happening. Nope, center mass, kill shot immediately without either of them saying a word. 20 years warranted.

Beautiful description of the classic wannabe cop 😂

Yes sometimes it's best to mind your business

@Dima-X – Gotoro Of course. I didnt mean to say its 100% survivable, but more than not i’d say. Various things could happen like you said, low chance but you could bleed out. And yes, the leg is way harder to hit b, even if he had missed i feel like it would be enough to get him away. Im not sure if he had any intent in killing or not though.

@Chronospa Bro, shooting in the legs is difficult, even more so when you're shooting relatively small targets, like knees and feet, as they're not as big as torso and are moving. Even if you shoot in the legs though, you can shatter bones, pieces of which can rupture the arteries in particular the big femoral artery and good luck recovering from that, you can pass away within minutes. If an ambulance took 90 mins in this video, if what I described above were to happen, the person wouldn't stand a chance. So, my point is, "anywhere below the abdomen is survivable" is not always true. And yes, the situation matters a lot. You simply don't have enough time to think in general, not that this applies to this case

@Accuser_of_the_Brethren yeah, if he really felt threatened i feel like he could've shot his knee or foot at the very least. anywhere below the abdomen is survivable, so is above but its less likely, then again you dont really have time to think in that type of situation. Depends on perspective.

@Accuser_of_the_Brethren nah some people are just dangerous

I have a guy on my street in town who’s a towny. But he’s cool at least. Wears the same red shorts and T-shirt EVERYDAY! Straightens people garbage cans and sweeps the sidewalks and shit lol

Same here, especially using the "my store" type of language then picking a fight with the woman when he isn't handicapped or have anyone handicapped in his car. Dude gets pushed over for fucking with his old lady, turns around and shoots dude in the chest without even saying "back up" or "stop or ill shoot" or anything, just sat up and pulled the trigger  🙄 poor guy was even waking away sideways away from him. Shit is overkill and sad because he's got a family too. Never should have gave that guy a weapon or a chance to use it.


Wtf was drejka’s attorney saying?<br>“The camera was low definition. Even the color was bad” as an argument like wtf?? Was it in reverse too?

Wtf was drejka’s attorney saying?
“The camera was low definition. Even the color was bad” as an argument like wtf?? Was it in reverse too?

I think its pretty common actually for arguments used by the defending party to be petty or insignificant like that. Its just a little detail that seeds extra doubt in the prosecution's case. Ideally they would build a wall of little things like this to tilt the jury in their favor, but its pretty hard to do that here. Its a point. The jury probably isn't convinced, similar to you and I, but the man's job is to try and build a defense for his client.

“Your honor... THIS was the camera being used in the facility!” <b>pulls out potato</b>

“Your honor... THIS was the camera being used in the facility!” *pulls out potato*

The argument was weak, but I'm not sure what else he could have argued after his client said he was scared for his life and the video proved that the victim was retreating, other than casting doubt about the video itself. His tone of voice bugged me, though.. was the jury made up entirely of children?

Didn’t the guy that offd Floyd have a lawyer that said “space aliens invaded his mind” or something along those lines?

The deceased man is lucky he isn't being charged wuth attempted murderer. Michael Drejka was lucky he had a gun in his hand and was able to use it to catch the impact of the bullet the man shot from his belly

The guy self incriminated himself several times during the interrogation. The lawyer's job was impossible

@Banjo Peppers thing is, even if the guy that was shot was a straight bar of 5 pixels and Michael was another, you would still clearly see the one bar moving <b>away</b> from the other. The definition of the camera is totally irrelevant, and in my opinion even bringing it up only further weakens their already pathetic defense

@Banjo Peppers thing is, even if the guy that was shot was a straight bar of 5 pixels and Michael was another, you would still clearly see the one bar moving *away* from the other. The definition of the camera is totally irrelevant, and in my opinion even bringing it up only further weakens their already pathetic defense

"And you're gonna see there are some wavey lines..."

Don't they know about ESRGAN ? Just saying haha

@Mettallica0<br>Yeah the defence attorney could've brought that aspect up as well I guess, it's just as idiotic as everything else he said

@Mettallica0
Yeah the defence attorney could've brought that aspect up as well I guess, it's just as idiotic as everything else he said

“your honor, if played backwards, the video will show that my client was victim to satanic brain washing.”

@Banjo Peppers thats how I felt watching it. No matter what, every arrow pointed to him. I hate it for both parties but he was in the wrong. In the heat of the moment who knows what he was seeing through his eyes. But the way the defense attorney talked really killed it. The other guy did an incredible job on proving why he was in the wrong though. I would hire him.

I think it's a pretty good defense when you don't have much else to go on - since they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, pointing out that the camera footage isn't super clear is a good thing to bring up. I mean like maybe he was pulling out a banana! We don't know! It was a good effort for a defense team that didn't really have much else to use for their defense. But then the "he's the real victim here! uwu" part just trashed their already not super great defense argument.

when you're doing an exam and you don't know the answer so you just write the very first bullshit that comes to mind

He didn't have anything else to argue on is my guess.


"released for 25 days" imagine if he was black

exactly. if these roles were switched he would be dead too


I can't believe the patience of these officers, that CCTV is a godsend.

𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓭𝓲 𝓳𝓸𝓱𝓷𝓼𝓸𝓷


I hate this attitude that he has that he is obligated to approach vehicles, circle them, take photos, and antagonize the passengers about being in a handicap parking spot. He pretends to be a cop and tries to use all of the same lingo to make himself sound intelligent, but in reality he is some guy with a gun looking for trouble and starting trouble where he wants to.

@Adam Jensen science space creepy stuff LMAO 🤣 go away ADAM!!!

@Wes T looking at her profile picture she’s already in her 60s, this is how she’ll be forever, sadly

@Kaylus No, no they shouldn't call out this behavior. They should anonymously report them and that's it. Anything else is crossing a line. Confrontation is entirely unnecessary in this situation.

I bet she won’t park illegally in a handicapped spot again.. lesson learned the hard way

I'm disabled and I really appreciate people who put idiots who park in the handicap spots in their place. Especially since there was clearly other free parking spots in this case.

@brenna in reality its between the person parked there and law enforcement

Favorite part was the detective indirectly telling him he would not have done it if he didn't have a gun lol

Would you have wanted him to call the cops? For someone parking on the handicapped spot?

@tutorial: brush him Exactly. Parking in a handicapped parking lane is a bad thing to do but that doesn't justify murder.

@Kaylus Please, don't try to divert blame. Nobody ever denied that stealing handicapped parking spaces is wrong, but it is ignorant at best and outright malicious at worst to act like that is anywhere NEAR the plane of murder.

Yes....he has pulled his gun on other people before. They mentioned it after the verdict.

why is it his business anyways on who parks in handicap spots, he never mentions hes handicapped. thats between the person who needs that spot and the person whos parked in it

yup   a lot of that out there these days

yup   a lot of that out there these days

That question when they said would you do the same thing if you had a gun switched my mind about the situation... but all n reality the dude made a violence offense ... I do think this guy was looking for trouble.

@VeloxFelidae EXACTLY! People are having a hard time getting that people are mad because a guy died over parking in a handicap spot. No one is saying yeah it was ok for them to park there. No one is 100% innocent in this but the consequence is not equal dropping dead in front of your 5 year old child.

@Kaylus i don't think this was his first time doing this ... He said that he always carried a gun, all his life ... And the fact that he fired the gun after the guy backed up makes me think that he wanted to use his gun eventually, that in his head was something like "okay, this guy pushed me to the ground, i'm justified to shoot him " ... plus, i don't think that if the guy was white and the same thing happened , things would've gone the same way ... but hey, that's just my opinion.

@Kaylus While I definitely agree that it is shitty to park in handicapped spaces, that is really so far beyond the point. It’s like saying that we should all learn from Breonna Taylor not to date drug dealers. Like, sure, maybe that is good general life advise, but this is a murder, and the relevance of that fact is borderline tangential.

At the same time, parking in handicapped places is a shitty move and the response they offered when confronted is equally shitty. People should call out BS behavior like this, but not with guns.

He acts like he is knowledgeable about law enforcement but he said ALL the wrong shit.


I don’t like lazy ass ppl who take handicap spots but even if that’s the case that’s no excuse to murder someone wtf


I CANNOT with this guy and his improvised arm sling.

@TRIPLE X he wouldn’t have had to defend his woman if a man wasn’t verbally harassing her in front of his children, so the shooter was in the wrong.

@John Reynolds for verbally harassing his FEMALE partner in front of their children. If I was a man, I would’ve done the same exact thing to protect my woman and children.

It's also funny how the moment the officer leaves the room he stops acting.

@John Reynolds he did, but that's no reason to shoot a man in front of his family, a man that was walking away.

The Black guy really did push him pretty Hard tho

He was special ops, don't you know? Survival techniques can come in really handy, especially when you're being interrogated for manslaughter

I know I wish I didn't find it funny!!!🤷♀

@Kendra Baird Remembering he entered the room cuffed from behind..so could the handcuffs caused his injury or maybe the toilet lid in the restroom as thats when he began using his shirt as a sling, on his return..or maybe..

@Kendra Baird and then says "oh yeah don't worry about that"... smh.....

I'm wondering why did he need an arm sling? Arm sling is for either to reduce the blood flow to the forearm when there is a cut or stitch, or when an arm is dislocated in order to keep it back in place 😄

Oddly enough, I've watched this one before. I'm now on my second watch through, and I realized how his "sling" evolved from him just holding his arm funny to using his shirt as a sling like that. It's interesting to see how he was trying his hardest to look like a victim in all this.