Nothing is going to happen. He is free. He will remain free. He will never take responsibility for what he's done.

@APOLO656 official oh they will pay. But not in this life. Not until judgement day.

@Yosetime qeii is just as culpable as harry charles or andrew.

@Cheezel LOPP there wasnt an argument. They were saying completely separate things. Youre an argumentative troll.

@WiredFox how about the girl in the picture with him who said he forced himself on her repeatedly? Is that evidence enough for you?

@Stephen Filer there is exactly a 0 percent chance of him facing criminal prosecution in the united states.

He did nothing wrong young naive women want to be treated like that they love only money

*will never be made to take responsibility for what he's done, by the law, the royal family, by the queen, or anyone else.

nobody gets away with anything. Thank God that He exists along with His justice. This creep will suffer all eternity in hell for his sin.

@Searean Moon yeah it is. The queen literally would have to ok the police arresting them if they are near her

Funny that I never even knew about him before this video

@Searean Moon so many of commenters don't understand you but what you said in the first comment is actually true. If we believe he will be punished, it might happen. If we don't believe it could happen, it most certanly won't!

Novak Djokovic is deemed to be the greatest tennis player of all times by most. And his tactic is just that. He visualised every of his GS titles, every of his big wins. He tries to teach others how significant it can be.

“Rules for thee but not for me!”

That’s true for all rich fucks, but in the case of countries with royalty it may be literally written into their legal system.

No one should be able to get away with what he did.

( ´・（● ●）・` ) oink

@Searean Moon You are simple minded this will have consequences for a member of the royal family.

@Reel Mermaid also he is a white man with power, nothing could ever happen

His reputation and privilages have been forever destroyed!The rest of the royal familily had to disassociate from him.He cant go to any of the families functions,even his daughters wedding and all the causes he was involved in and his "work" is over.Hes socially dead.

First, they need to find evidence, a 'he said' isn't enough for a criminal charge, even a facial reaction isn't good enough

In the royal family public image is extremely important. Dragging his name through the dirt for the rest of his scumbag life will surely give at least some justice for the terrible things done.

Unless... You know, one day they’ll all pay.

@Searean Moon no you just lost the argument so it's done regardless

@An Anthropomorphic Talking Gourd hey man what did the guy said?

@An Anthropomorphic Talking Gourd since you obviously suffer from last-word-itis, I will let you have it, you win, congrats!

@An Anthropomorphic Talking Gourd you must enjoy missing the point of things...I guess it makes you feel special or something...please read what I wrote, think about it, even if it takes years, until you understand, THEN come back and talk with me about it, my time is precious!

@An Anthropomorphic Talking Gourd no one is truly "above the law", once they have done enough evil (and this group has) it becomes only a matter of time...

and you missed the point, what we think and believe we can make reality, so I was telling her they are not as all-powerful as they want everyone to think!!

all this deflection is to distract...be brave and face reality!

@Searean Moon no they won't, they're literally above the law. England is a monarchy, they basically own the country.

When mum's in charge of the entire judicial system it helps.

and the royal family "the firm" will continue to protect him, while making up rubbish stories about Harry and Megan to take the heat of andy...


The bit where she speaks of Ghislaine Maxwell as being his friend, he leaves unchallenged - he's happy with that relationship being recognised. Not a good look now.


3:50 If I will take anything from this interview, it is that this Prince Andrew behaves himself with such positive acts.


I had to watch this twice because the first time I was subconsciously so focused on that gross asymmetrical glob between his collar and his chin that I tuned practically everything else out in my disgust.


Those who were never questioned for their actions, feel like fish out o water when held accountable, publicly!


Argues it wasn't a dinner party. Minutes later calls it a dinner party. Nothing gets past that man

No I didn't have sexual relations with a child but I did have some 🍕 tho, yo somebody tell this toff 🦎 that we know what that code word means....

@Lady V There isn't a smartest royal because there isn't a smart royal. Not male royal anyway. All stale, pale males.

JP likes pineapple mannn i don’t even remember what i ate last night

Nicola Maxwell I loved the comment about nothing getting past the bold Andy

Not to be mean, but DOY is not exactly the smartest royal.

Says he doesn't remember having sex but does remember the pizza he had that night

He went from "i left the next day" to "o i actually stayed because it was convineint"


Right at the end of the interview, just before he says unbecoming, he is shaking his head, then he looks to the left for a second and says 'yes'.  He is answering yes to the question but shaking his head at the same time. Body language doesn't lie!


I wish you would do a break down of the full interview


I knew he was lying when he said "suicide"....but also every other moment also. Lol


The way he makes such a hard statement that "sex is a positive act" makes me think that whatever mischief he got up to involved him sitting or lying down and not "doing the work himself".


Omg, he sounds like one of Chris Hansen’s predators who claim “I just drove 3 hours to the 12 year olds house to tell her I wasn’t coming over and that nothing was going to happen.”

My friendship with Jeffrey Epstein was truly the cleanest, best pleasure

“yea I flew from cali to new york just to tell this 15 year old I meant online to be weary of online predators”

What they seem to misunderstand is that the parents not knowing they were coming over is the number one red flag, even if the communications with the minor had nothing sexual or romantic. Some of the people Hansen interacted with alleged they wanted to become a mentor figure. A true "teacher" asks to meet the kid's parents and has no issues coming when adults are in the house.

@Jo-Erlend Schinstad "I'm a mechanic, I teach bike maintenance."

So true!

"Well Andrew, there's one more thing I think you should know."

Unfortunately, Andrew really was free to leave.

Why don't you have a seat right over there?

Jo-Erlend Schinstad lol Mikes Hard Lemonade too🙃

Lea Shimanek or he shows up at the house where the 13 year old girl is at bringing her fish and chips and a box of After eights.

@Maria and then offers a slice to Chris Hansen hahahah

Exactly what I was thinking. This guy is a terrible liar

HAHAHAHA You know that pizza guy? he was like i was gonna just chill and eat pizza with her

@Raising Cain: Thanks for reminding me. I watched an episode on youtube once. Always intended to see the rest. Just downloaded. :) I really love what they did on that show!

Jo-Erlend Schinstad Yep! That sounds about right mate

With newly bought lubrication and condoms for the occasion, if I recall correctly?


are you uploading any more videos? love your content, ive watched every video at least twice


For a man who was gifted such a prominent high position on earth, he knows hardly anything... "i didn't know" " I wasn't aware".. sheesh.. his lies are epic


His reactions and body language DO NOT align with what he’s saying or compared to someone who is saying the truth🤣


I can swear i have seen a far longer version of this.


"Unbecoming? He was a sex offender..."

I loved that response. I could tell her real self slipped out from behind her interviewer personality.

No, that is how Emily is. He should have known that she's an excellent journalist.

She also probably doesn't care because she knows she has THE interview everyone wanted. But I felt that exchange just slipped out  as if she does have someone who was hurt by a sex offender in her past. It wasn't planned; it was reactive. And it showed in her face!

NibiruLives Enough with the dog whistling LOL

@Benjy thats what i was saying. She actually gave a shit about the interview, and she doesn't need baggage to care unlike what mister "i love defending pedophiles" @nibirulives was talking about

@NibiruLives why must she have baggage?? Because she doesn't like pedos? Maybe the cops should take a look at your computer.

@NibiruLives Or has any loose sense of morals to know that a sex offender that traffics children isn't just "unbecoming". Anyone with half a brain and a sliver of empathy would react that way.


He's the perfect liar! He can't sweat, and just when you think you've got him pinned-down, he was at a pizza express in Woking.


the way he feigns confusion is similar to how I did when I was 6, pretending I didn't break my mum's vase


“After I got married I certainly never felt the need to go and party”- I didn’t realize married people don’t like party’s anymore.


That second hand embarrassment when she mentions the guy seeing him get a foot massage😭😭


I think the reason he stubbornly denies partying is that while we consider partying not to be anything extrordinary, he associates the concept of "partying" with more devious things such as unconsentual sex with young vunerable women and minors

@SliceySlicer Prince Charles is the Royal involved in covering that one up..

ImmaSingWhatIWant I guess there were “hunting parties” that you wouldn’t want to even know about.

@Jane Doe X If I had to guess, either skeet shooting or hunting.

@ImmaSingWhatIWantYeah, but I wonder.....shooting what at what? If Epstein was accused of being a junkie,  that wording would at least make some sense .
Or is there a meaning of "shoot(ing)" that has anything to do with a party ?
Other than taking " shots" ?
 Such a weird word to use....
Or is it because it isn't my first language?

But it wasn't a party; it was a straightforward shooting weekend.

SliceySlicer they aren’t accounts of men being sex trafficked at those parties?? unless you can provide me of them, maybe i’m uneducated here but, if not, this isn’t the time to deflect away from vulnerable women and minors to say what about the minority of men that get taken advantage of?

Gabriel Yoo Yeah. Partying is normal, but he <b>knows</b> what “partying” with Jeffrey Epstein means. Shows he knows exactly what was going on, what “parties” in that context entail. So when recalling those memories, he wants to disassociate himself with any of those “parties” — it ironically shows his guilt, though, as he would only show such aversion if he knew exactly what the parties were like.

Gabriel Yoo Yeah. Partying is normal, but he *knows* what “partying” with Jeffrey Epstein means. Shows he knows exactly what was going on, what “parties” in that context entail. So when recalling those memories, he wants to disassociate himself with any of those “parties” — it ironically shows his guilt, though, as he would only show such aversion if he knew exactly what the parties were like.


you can see him smiling as he remembers what he did


Whoever advised Mr Windsor to take this interview hung him out to dry 🤣, it's the most condemning interview I've ever Witnessed


4:37 "Tell me you're guilty without telling me you're guilty"


This dude reminds me of when Trump said publicly he wished Ghislaine Maxwell well after her arrest lol


Jim is gonna have to learn how to swim real quick after this one.

@Alan Taylor Lol... Me to, I'm reading all these comments about Jim, and I'm like Who the fuck is Jim ! Lol... Damn I was confused! Lol

Been a JCS fan for a while. This one did not disappoint. Great work! 👍 Ending was fab

@Floedekage <br>Oh right, how did I miss that! The damn channel name. I thought I was familiar with the people in the Epstein case so I was wondering who the hell Jim was lol

@Floedekage
Oh right, how did I miss that! The damn channel name. I thought I was familiar with the people in the Epstein case so I was wondering who the hell Jim was lol

@Alan Taylor JCS - The Channel name used to be "Jim Can't Swim"

Who is Jim? Is Jim "JCS" that was referenced at the end?

The man who helped plan his own murder. If Jim's body turns up in a lake we know why.

@GrapjesmetTomenTim - how can a man over 6ft tall hang himself from a bunk bed too?

Don't worry. We can put up some video cameras and post some guards to keep watch... what could go wrong?

lol is it even safe to comment . shit im scared now hope my front door isnt booted in as im in bed with the cat dunking my digestive . stay safe people .

@NibiruLives Yes. Jim do NOT try on any new shoes someone randomly tries to sell you.🤣

I don't think Jim will get suicided over this. YT is promoting this story, and if the sidebar is any indication, then Andrew is all over the MSM right now. It looks very much like Andrew is a limited hangout, an approved sacrifice to help quell the rising tide of "Epstein Didn't Kill Himself" memes.

Right at the start of this video, we can see why that might be the case.  Prince Andrew is associated with the monarchy, and there are many elements within the British power structure who would prefer to see the monarchy either sidelined or abolished altogether. From 0:15 to 2:00, Jim primes the audience for a discussion on British Republicanism. We are meant to go into this story with our minds focused on tangential issues like "the monarchy" and "progressivism", rather than focusing on the fact that for more than a decade, the global political elite have been united in trying to suppress this story.

Nothing's going to happen to Clinton, Trump, Dershowitz, or the thousands of other politically-connected individuals who visited Epstein over the years. But the public is too aware of the story now for it to get memory holed or shut down with simple ad hominem ("billionaire paedo, come on, that's a conspiracy theory!"), so at least one person has to go. Might as well be Andrew.

Through courage, we can sideline powerful parasites.

The Increment have been put on standby...

Inappropriate to be seen together? Meaning ok as long as they were not seen together. That is why he stayed another 4 days.

I was thinking the exactly same thing. Deep shit.

I’ve heard of clinticide.  Are you referring to andrewcide?

@GrapjesmetTomenTim you have enemies like the Clintons or prince charming here.

@Doc Skate I mean he's innocent until proven guilty but he hasn't helped himself here and it's still extremely murky and unclear what if any involvement he had with the whole Epstein trafficking etc

No need.
His tribe already put this self entitled man(?) out of the "Royal picture".
Hard to not think this guy is guilty.
He surely will be kept in the poison chest from now on.
Edit: 19:05 is priceless🤣

cosmicmelon hahah beautiful comment buddy

@GrapjesmetTomenTim A pre-programmed robotic arm

@GrapjesmetTomenTim you can't, i'm sure that was the point

He should have reached enough patrons trust me

Jim better stay out of all underground tunnels lmao


You don't have to be a psychologist to see that the man is lying through his teeth.


Reporter:  Witnesses report you getting a foot massage.
Andrew: A what ?
Reporter:  A foot massage from a young Russian woman.
Andrew: Well in addition to not being able to sweat, I also don't have any feet, so it would be impossible for me to get a foot massage.

Reporter:  Witnesses report you getting a foot massage.
Andrew: A what ?
Reporter:  A foot massage from a young Russian woman.
Andrew: Well in addition to not being able to sweat, *I also don't have any feet,* so it would be impossible for me to get a foot massage.


Dude just should’ve stayed home and declined the interview. Dude knows he’s guilty.


Interviewer: so Andrew, it is known that you breathe quite heavily, is that true?<br>Andrew: well that’s funny as I don’t have lungs or I didn’t at the time.

Interviewer: so Andrew, it is known that you breathe quite heavily, is that true?
Andrew: well that’s funny as I don’t have lungs or I didn’t at the time.


Shoutout to this video being so spot on it had to be unlisted

@Tim Chew In that vid, he's being roasted by JCS, XQC, the reporter and the pizza spammers in chat.

@Tim Chew OHMYGOD this unlocked a memory. The Jim Can't Swim days... wow

I almost wondered if this was the real JCS! I thought watched ALL the videos!

@Tim Chew literally me! I was like no way I missed this.

@Ozzy Blaze Gaming all good man, you get more laughs out of the original one hahha

@numbX_X turns out the video was heavily edited. Here's the original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_TiseJLcE0

No wonder I never found it until today! I was wondering how I missed this; I've binged all of JCS's videos lol. Thankfully it's public again


The fact that he even associated with those creeps pretty much tells me all I need to know about Andrew.

Exactly. Everyone knew Bob Maxwell and that she was his doted-on daughter who defended him to the hilt. That alone damns anyone who would be buddies with her.


One of the most perfectly cut endings I've ever seen.


I've worked private security for high profile clients for more then a decade. Trust me if they frequent a property where lots of people go in and out they will need to know WHO and WHAT they are doing there. These clients are not as high profile as the lying prince


This is why defense lawyers always urge their clients not to take the stand.

@Joe Rogaine the defendant doesn’t need to take the stand. They’re under no obligation and because it’s within their rights it can’t be seen as an admission of guilt

So what's really the consensus among criminal defense attorneys? Should the defendant take the stand or not?

@Michael Thats totally incorrect. The defendant has no obligation to take the stand. It is their right to remain silent !  And your rights are not an admission of guilt. <br>The defendant never had to prove they are innocent. It’s upto the prosecution to prove, beyond doubt, they are guilty.

@Michael Thats totally incorrect. The defendant has no obligation to take the stand. It is their right to remain silent !  And your rights are not an admission of guilt.
The defendant never had to prove they are innocent. It’s upto the prosecution to prove, beyond doubt, they are guilty.

@Roger Kearns because the prosecution lawyer will find holes in the defendants story and rip them to pieces. The prosecutor can’t do that if the defendant uses their right to remain silent. At the end of the day the burden of proof is on the prosecution, the defendant doesn’t have to do anything.

Wait this is wrong. Defense lawyers always tell their client not to talk with a lawyer, not to not take a stand. “Take the stand” implies going up and speaking in court. Sometimes taking the stand is absolutely beneficial for the defense team. Often times i would say. But talking without a lawyer to a cop or any other agent is never good.

@Michael Prince Andrew is guilty as sin. But you really need to look up the amount of people who took a plea bargain for a crime they didn't commit, or were innocent but found guilty anyway because of how the interrogation goes. When detectives have someone in custody, they're only hunting for a confession, not the truth. And they've had years and years of training to pressure a confession out of people. Hell, even if you get pulled over for no reason, you are under no obligation to answer questions by the police officer, and that is the law. But notice how extreme they'll pressure you to answer.

Epstein told her to go to the police and report him for sexual abuse. part of his plan was to go to jail.

 Epstein wanted to get caught.

what we are witnessing now is epstein's "dead man's switch". he is leaking all the photos and emails and videos from beyond the grave. the man is a genius

@Michael and nervous or guilty seeming innocent people some times innocent people come across wrong and people's bias on looks and character kick.in

Jack Sainthill only one type of person doesn’t take the stand in their own defense, guilty people.

@Roger Kearns which is don't take the stand

@richard perkins <br>Irrelevant This was about the defense lawyer's preference.

@richard perkins
Irrelevant This was about the defense lawyer's preference.

If you're guilty it's best to keep your mouth shut.

I thought that they usually preferred that they stand, but OK.


How regrettable he was after watching him stumble so hard by his own words...


If Andrew wasn’t interviewed, his involvement would have been speculation like trump and clinton.


Wow, I'm shocked he did this interview. I'm not however shocked that he saw those girls as things instead of human beings.


"I went there just to say that I can't stay there" - LOL


Emily, the one who interviewed Andrew, was brilliant - surgeon like.

@Andy Moran. saying that Canada is still under the crown so technically...

@Andy Moran. man I was just starting to be proud of a British journalist. Guess it couldnt be true.

Mitchell Trubisky like I’ve said before, being more aggressive would’ve been less effective. He would’ve closed up and got defensive. Her method was a lot better.

She could've exposed him entirely if she really wanted to. She was being incredibly nice albeit im sure it's bv he's royalty in her own country

@Humphrey B  Really, first I've heard of this, what publication(s) did she appear in?

Patrick Finn what are you taking about? It’s not an opinion. It’s a fact that many reports of Paedophilia & other sexual deviants were ignored for years. Especially the ones involving “their” celebrity staff & bosses. The statues outside their main building were built by a Paedo too 👍

@Pete THE REAL Relentless 🤦♂ nice one 👍  Always get that kind of ad hom response when I catch people chatting shit, glad you didn't disappoint 😘

Kasia harder doesn’t mean better. Too combative and you get nothing.

Jay Bee again, no evidence, just a narrative you find compelling.

@Empayer  yes I should explain. Previous to this I watched anothe video on it whereby the guest to the analysis pointed out that she wasn't "an educate girl ,she wasn't up there with the royals but she wiped the floor with him.<br>I was being sarcastic.

@Empayer  yes I should explain. Previous to this I watched anothe video on it whereby the guest to the analysis pointed out that she wasn't "an educate girl ,she wasn't up there with the royals but she wiped the floor with him.
I was being sarcastic.

joejitsu034 if they protected them wouldn’t this be held at a young woman’s shelter that he vouchers at? Like I think she would have been like oh well see ya that makes sense and then at the end talk into the camera and say it is my feeling that he is absolutely telling the truth.

This was a great interview. She was ice cold frosty like. I wish I saw her on more programs.

If only that was the norm and not the exception.

@Ally Bamma You said, "Not bad for an uneducated lass".  Are you referring to Emily Maitlis, if not, then whom?

@Oliver Payne I didnt make any mention of that specifically. What I said was theres plenty of conspiracy to go around in this story so to pretend like conspiracies are just fictional tales is foolish.

Rawb Mar you just suggested the bbc coached her to not expose his lies based on no evidence whatsoever, a crazy idea with no evidence other than you find the narrative compelling. I don’t believe conspiracy theories because they’re all crap

@Ally Bamma Her Alma Mater is Queen's College Cambridge, so I doubt what you say has any credence.

@Sam S Prince Andrew is one of many people who were brought to light. There are a bunch of powerful people that hung around with Epstein and yes of course his death is 100% not a suicide as ruled by a top professional. There's lots going on and probably even more than I mentioned.

Rawb Mar what is the conspiracy in the fact that this dude participated with Epstein in having sex with under age girls??? Like what’s not clicking dude??? Ok ya there’s some points being made in the conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein’s actual death but there’s no conspiracy in Andrews part in all this. He’s guilty

@Oliver Payne Right because this whole story doesn't have conspiracy written all over it. You obviously know some conspiracies are real so in those scenarios where you're plugging your ears ignoring the truth you're the one believing stories over facts, its a two way street.

joejitsu034 1) she wasn’t instructed 2) more combat active ness would’ve been ineffective, what she did tore him apart far more 3) conspiracy theories are for people who value stories over facts

She was surgical like jimmy hendrix, and so brave

Her prep and demeanour were outstanding, more like detective interviews and completely unlike Bashir or Paxman. Time to watch and learn, British press...

Brave as well. Regardless any preconception it must be scary squaring up to a member of the royal family in your own country like that.

She did an article later on explaining her thought process going into the interview- her plan was never to tear Andrew down and start a scandel, simply to uncover truth. I think that ability to analyse facts as they come to you shows true expert journalism.


Calling little girls young women, is the media softening the blow

@Zoe you have no idea what you're talking about... I imagine culture is a foreign concept to you

jodybobble i think what OP pointed out goes beyond the point of cultural differences and is as simple as they put it.


Honestly he is so bad at lying it’s funny

“There was a picture of you sweating”
“I  D O N T  S W E A T”

My neck my back My crippling anxiety Attack 🎗


Ok so he’s obviously lying we all know that. Now what?


What cracks me up the most, is the fact, that after this interview he was very proud of himself and thought it all went splendidly. What a tool.

He’s that arrogant he thinks everybody will believe him because he’s Prince Andrew of course the peasants will believe me is what he’ll be thinking.


lol the middle commentary had me dead. I totally felt as well that andrew here was so animated with the textbook indicators of lying ie. shifting the eyes, stammering and all those forced emotions.


1:09 interviewer: are you absolutely sure? Andrew: absolutely sure. Slightly shakes his head no saying it

That's no synchronised body language I believe, Sir. Also the pitch drop pointing at a higher level of confidence when the topic changes and he suddenly stumbles over his words a hell of a lot less...  Apparently watching Observe is paying off lol

1:09 interviewer: are you absolutely sure? Andrew: absolutely sure. *Slightly shakes his head no saying it*

That's no synchronised body language I believe, Sir. Also the pitch drop pointing at a higher level of confidence when the topic changes and he suddenly stumbles over his words a hell of a lot less...  Apparently watching Observe is paying off lol


Dude I laughed so hard..he's so bad at lying.


His aversion of the word “party” makes me queasy. what horrible things this man saw and did at Epstein’s “parties”

To quote Ian Dury, those parties consisted of Sex and Drugs and Rock and Roll...but with children.

It was like a "train" station. People coming then leaving. People going in and out. Trains everywhere.


Who else is back for round 3 after the ghislaine conviction?


How you know someone is lying: “I don’t remember”


I am surprised that he is such a poor liar as he has done it for so many years!


Andy was definitely at Pizza Express that night. He remembers after all these years because he had extra anchovies on his pizza that night.


As a Linguistics student, I find it very interesting the way they changed the words to minimize the situation. It wasn't pedophilia or rape, it was unlawful sex with a minor. She was taken to his home to perform sexual activities, she wasn't a victim of human trafficking. He ''only'' visited a few times, which changes the fact he took part in a criminal activity multiple times. It is sad to see that in some way, it was successful.

@Serbeb Rofag You said "UK laws don't apply overseas." The incident with Prince  Andrew and the 17 year old girl happened in London. So that's not "overseas" and UK laws apply. Any more emojis you'd like to respond with?🤷♂

@M.B. he said it because linguistics is invalid.

@M.B. he said it because linguistics is invalid.

how are the words "unlawful sex with a minor" worse than "pedophilic rape"? Do those phrases not have the same general meaning? You as a linguistics student obviously know better than me in this case so I am genuinely asking. to me, a 15-year-old who knows nothing of linguistics, they both sound horrible of course, but pedophilia and rape sound worse because my heart does a thing whenever I hear them. Kinda like a slur I guess? They're just disgusting words. I really don't know how to put it better than that

Yes, and they use different kind of words when talking abt MM as well.

@High Rise Media UK laws do not apply overseas

@High Rise Media UK laws do not apply overseas

It was. It's so true every story has as many sides as tellers and they're all "real"

What criminal activity? She was of legal age in the UK (She was 17 and the legal age of consent is 16 in the UK) and by all accounts consented and was even smiling with his arm around her in the photo. He shouldn't have lied about it, and simply should have owned up to it and hired a good attorney to deal with the civil lawsuits. But there would never have been a criminal action for what he did with this girl in London.

However, the reporter is making it sound much like a detective would, minimize the sounding of the issue, so that they (the one being interviewed) will feel more relaxed to open up more like "oh yeah it really wasn't that bad" and then proceeds to go into detail.

@The Zigzagman Holy shit thats fucked. Australia is age of consent 16..or within 2 years (13yr and 14yr ) is legal.

@ConManliness

The main thing is; this guy got away with doing some real bad shit to young girls. Picking it apart, or saying it's less bad, it's all irrelevant. He sucks, and that's it.

I don't think anyones an idiot for defining a law differently, law is very complicated and also regionally unique, but I do think pointing out inconsistencies in internet people's definitions detracts from the main topic- this guy is lying.

@MILLIE you get upset and report my comment? 😂

@MILLIE you get upset and report my comment? 😂

@MrKristyon it might be considered rape by idiots. Rape has a specific definition, referring to a forceful penetrative act. What you're describing is statuatory rape, which has little to do with actual rape at all.

@MrKristyon it might be considered rape by idiots. Rape has a specific definition, referring to a forceful penetrative act. What you're describing is *statuatory* rape, which has little to do with *actual* rape at all.

@MrKristyon it's considered <b>statuatory</b> rape, not rape. It's really not rape at all

@MrKristyon it's considered *statuatory* rape, not rape. It's really not rape at all

Maybe it’s a way for him to rationalize because facing the truth which is an anxiety triggering situation

@ConManliness false. A child can be groomed to believe they are consenting and not forced but it is considered rape to have sex with a person under 16 or even 18 in some circumstances.

He won't get tried in any American court he won't turn up unless the c.i.a kidnap him he's not that stupid

@Joss Bailey No I agree, the trafficking is absolutely the problem. Anyone in their right mind can see that. <br>I feel it's important to differentiate something like sexual coercion and something like rape, however. While both are terrible, they are distinct from one another. Rape refers specifically to a forceful sexual penetration, which would not include coercion

@Joss Bailey No I agree, the trafficking is absolutely the problem. Anyone in their right mind can see that.
I feel it's important to differentiate something like sexual coercion and something like rape, however. While both are terrible, they are distinct from one another. Rape refers specifically to a forceful sexual penetration, which would not include coercion

@ConManliness if they were trafficked against their will, ie not knowing they were going for sex that’s the problem. Also, working with young people, I know that a 17 year old away from home confronted by rich men on their own island/estate whatever, would really struggle to say “no I don’t want sex with the prince, please take me home” they would have been very scared and manipulated into the situation, when sex is the only option that is rape, not violent rape, but if choices and chances to say no are removed, legally that’s being coerced into sex which is rape

It's wierd how this is a linguistics thing.

It's wierd how this is a linguistics thing.

@S M Age of consent and age of majority are different in the UK: 16 vs 18. An adult could technically lawfully have sex with a 17 yo minor. Obviously that doesn't apply here as she was being coerced

When an interrogator tries to fish information out of a suspect, some tricks they deploy is to make the suspect feel comfortable and to minimize the situation.  Perhaps even looking at it from his perspective and setting up a more positive narrative.  This way they can make the suspect open up more easily and divulge more information to build a better case against him.

Source: I binge-watched JCS Criminal Psychology

@Jay M i think her point was not that the two instances of "human trafficking" was the same, nor that he was somehow guilty without due process. She may have implied so through her expression, as you claimed, but that was beyond the point, was it not?

As a linguistics student and not a legal expert I wouldn't expect you should know why legal vernacular breaks crimes down into points of fact. That said, you should really have some basic knowledge of the legal profession before you speak.

Paedophiles a.k.a. people who are attracted to children exist who do not commit crimes, so the act of sex with a minor or obtaining pictures of kids etc. is the actual crime described as a point of fact. Also, the idea we have one crime, 'human trafficking', to cover such a broad spectrum of criminal activity is quite frankly preposterous. According to that logic, you charge the organisers of a human trafficking ring with the same crime as, say, a woman who was human trafficked herself and who then was put in charge of a group of girls later in life. According to you, both crimes are 'human trafficking' so both the kingpin and woman who was herself a victim of circumstance get charged with the same crime with no distinction whatsoever.

There is also a concept called innocent until proven guilty, which is applied in all instances until guilt is ascertained. Do I think Andrew is guilty? Yes. Should he be labelled as a child rapist before due process has taken place? No.

The law is specific for very practical reasons, I really wish alleged students from other disciplines who think they know what they're talking about could keep their misinformed opinions to themselves.

There was no indication that the girls were prepubescent, so it wouldn't make sense to call it pedophile. Pedophilia is also not a crime. It also is not rape unless there is forced sexual penetration against a person's will.

@vhyles that doesn't make him an ephebophile, that makes him a male. He would be an ephebophile if he were only or primarily attracted to women of that age.

To be fair he probably doesn’t have interact with normal people or normally.

@Ionasku Alexander I have no idea why you just said that. Don't be so lame.

I don't think it was successful. In some instances, people are smarter--or maybe more intuitive, at least--than wer'e often given credit for.  I think and feel that this is one of those occasions.

as if linguistics is a important field of study lol

as if linguistics is a important field of study lol

Yes, it is very disturbing, but then again sociopaths and child molesters — who are often one and the same — love to play the victim and absolve themselves of guilt, so it’s no wonder they’ll positively respond to their horrific actions being watered down this way.

@xcheesyindianx isn’t 16 the age of consent in the uk?

@xcheesyindianx isn’t 16 the age of consent in the uk?

The redefining of children to "young people" is very sinister too.

@xcheesyindianx Just so we are clear, i was  asumeing that minor refers to under 18. Are we on the same page or no?

Of course it exists. You joust have to be minor as well.

Also makes it easier to lure him into confessing, at least in part.

To chime in as another linguistics (and literature) student, this is quite often done by politicians and other rhetorics. Think of Reagan’s (and multiple US presidents in fact) infamous “Mistakes were made”. Their use of the passive with an omitted subject is basically a subtle way of avoiding direct responsibility. Minimisation and euphemistic constructs are so incredibly often used to avoid any confrontation and personal responsibility.

ugh, I hate the phrase “unlawful sex with a minor”. It implies that “lawful sex with a minor” exists

edit: stop telling me about the Romeo and Juliet exceptions. i know. you’re missing the point.


"I couldnt have been getting a foot massage from a young Russian girl because i have a medical condition where my feet have completely fallen off" Prince Andrew Epstein


Your very talented man...I will stay on the channel for life!


0:58- His 👀 made me laugh harder than I should’ve lol
1:10-  He shakes his head no while he’s saying “Yes, I’m sure”. Yeah, he’s totally believable 😂


The amazing thing is that the general tone of the interview and questions were all discussed beforehand and pre approved.


“It must have been pretty awkward staying another four nights after letting someone know you want nothing to do with them anymore” 😂

@꧁WupperElfe꧂ But it sounds like the narrator said "it must of..." ... and she was quoting the narrator. nothing to be ashamed of and the correction should apply to the narrator, if anything

nonya Xdova Actually, a lot of people care. Mostly people who are thinking of employing you. Let that sink in for a moment.

Especially flying halfway around the world to tell the guy who he only met a couple times a year face to face 😂. The best part is that he doesn't sweat.

KJV Job 12:19 He leadeth princes away spoiled, and overthroweth the mighty.
KJV Job 12:21 He poureth contempt upon princes, and weakeneth the strength of the mighty.
KJV Job 29:9 The princes refrained talking, and laid their hand on their mouth.
KJV Job 34:18 Is it fit to say to a king, Thou art wicked? and to princes, Ye are ungodly?
Trump is That King as in 2021 KS  Putin looses his sphere of influence and the wicked world becomes a Unilatral system with wicked Trump as the head of the UN in the US from SL onwards to the Plauges and Micheal Standing UP That Great Prince that Standeth for The Children of thy People.
KJV Job 34:19 How much less to him that accepteth not the persons of princes, nor regardeth the rich more than the poor? for they all are the work of his hands.
KJV Psalms 76:12 He shall cut off the spirit of princes: he is terrible to the kings of the earth.
KJV Psalms 82:7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.
KJV Psalms 107:40 He poureth contempt upon princes, and causeth them to wander in the wilderness, where there is no way.
KJV Psalms 118:9 It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in princes.
KJV Psalms 119:23 Princes also did sit and speak against me: but thy servant did meditate in thy statutes.
KJV Psalms 119:161 Princes have persecuted me without a cause: but my heart standeth in awe of thy word.
KJV Psalms 146:3 Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.
We are not to trust in princes, or to set men in the place of God. We are to remember that human beings are fallible and erring, and that He who has all power is our strong tower of defense. In every emergency we are to feel that the battle is His. His resources are limitless, and apparent impossibilities will make the victory all the greater.{PK 202}
KJV Proverbs 28:2 For the transgression of a land many are the princes thereof: but by a man of understanding and knowledge the state thereof shall be prolonged.
KJV Ecclesiastes 10:17 Blessed art thou, O land, when thy king is the son of nobles, and thy princes eat in due season, for strength, and not for drunkenness!
The observance of temperance and regularity in all things has a wonderful power. It will do more than circumstances or natural endowments in promoting that sweetness and serenity of disposition which count so much in smoothing life’s pathway. At the same time the power of self-control thus acquired will be found one of the most valuable of equipments for grappling successfully with the stern duties and realities that await every human being. {Ed 206}
KJV Isaiah 1:23 Thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards: they judge not the fatherless, neither doth the cause of the widow come unto them.
KJV 1 Corinthians 2:6 Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought:
KJV 1 Corinthians 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
God intends that even in this life the truths of His word shall be ever unfolding to His people. There is only one way in which this knowledge can be obtained. We can attain to an understanding of God's word only through the illumination of that Spirit by which the word was given.{SC 109}
KJV 1 Corinthians 2:13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

KJV Psalms 17:7 Shew thy marvellous lovingkindness, O thou that savest by thy right hand them which put their trust in thee from those that rise up against them.
8 Keep me as the apple of the eye, hide me under the shadow of thy wings,
9 From the wicked that oppress me, from my deadly enemies, who compass me about.
10 They are inclosed in their own fat: with their mouth they speak proudly.
11 They have now compassed us in our steps: they have set their eyes bowing down to the earth;
12 Like as a lion that is greedy of his prey, and as it were a young lion lurking in secret places.
13 Arise, O LORD, disappoint him, cast him down: deliver my soul from the wicked, which is thy sword:
14 From men which are thy hand, O LORD, from men of the world, which have their portion in this life, and whose belly thou fillest with thy hid treasure: they are full of children, and leave the rest of their substance to their babes.
15 As for me, I will behold thy face in righteousness: I shall be satisfied, when I awake, with thy likeness

@Mussie<br>But there were so many girls! 4 days wasn't enough time to get to bed all of them anyway!

@Mussie
But there were so many girls! 4 days wasn't enough time to get to bed all of them anyway!

Did he wesh his trotters before the foot job.... No, forget that, doesn't sweat, no bother.

@Seth Kauffman Because you have to refresh the page.. LOL

it is pitty to correct someone for a grammar error....english is not my native language and i am often called out for my mistakes....but untill we all understand each other,is it THAT important?

@Nancy Rodriguez Pardo its a pitty u cant put together a proper sentence

@nonya Xdova it is a pitty people does not matter about their native lenguage.

@c l yeah I've had it happen too, something isn't edited but then I click to reply and then it's edited...

@Seth Kauffman That was weird, it definitely wasn't edited when I wrote that lol. Youtube time travel confirmed.

Kinda like breaking up with someone on a rather long flight headed to a romantic destination?! <br>Seriously, though. Amazing skills with this one. 👌

Kinda like breaking up with someone on a rather long flight headed to a romantic destination?!
Seriously, though. Amazing skills with this one. 👌

@nonya Xdova that's pretty fair actually, haha

And this was the reporter holding herself back. You can tell she wanted to go all out but couldn't.

@The Trauma Queen or cause they know the grammar nerds wont leave em alone til they do L

@nonya Xdova I'd say the person who posted the original comment cares at least a bit, seeing as it's since been edited correctly


He didn t seem to be giving enough detail, or other stories or information, that an innocent person would, other than just say no no no, not me


This video ends at such a perfect moment 😂


Like I always say, you can never ask someone if they are a pedophile, you have to ask them between the lines if they are lying.


“Absolutely sure” <b>*shakes head*</b> 😂💀


@KyozokiYea the main guy "Jim" is an English accent speaking guy in his 20's who's extremely intelligent + creative.
I share identical political belief systems w/ him as a  leftists/dem. socialist etc, and made me love his chanell that much more.

Not sure if the narrator is a computer generated voice or part of the JCS team?

Kyozoki yeah he’s just a narrator, the Jim Cant Swim videos are produced by a group of people I think theres around 4 of them

@Bob 1 Nah, but I think you can find out more information about who does what for the videos on his patreon but I'm not sure.  I know he does post videos on there that do not get posted to YouTube

@Bob 1 then why is there a link to the narrator's channel in description?

But the narrator is not the guy who actually puts this videos together right?

He's by far the best true crimer/investigative type YouTuber IMO!  He literally out does himself w/ every video he puts out!!

Rightfully so. Only way to stay sane in this circus act


shaking his head like a little kid whos been caught stealing sweets. he is so clearly guilty the trial should just record this


I had a friend way back in middle school who had decided to try out lying for the first time.  He literally followed up his lie with "Uhhh, yeah ... that's right ..." and we called him out on it as being a lie.  He genuinely was surprised and asked how we knew.  I'm pretty sure he was mimicking what he saw on TV and had never tried it out on actual people before, which is the same kind of vibe I'm getting here.  That's the terrifying part - that (now former, thankfully) friend eventually became much more skilled at lying on subsequent attempts.


Not being good at lying is usually a good thing. 🤷🏻♀🤦🏻♀🇨🇦


There will always be no justice in this world when the judge is part of the same club as this guy.....Our world is going down. When there is no justice,  a real one, chaos will ensue.


He seems fairly confident for a moment, but when she asks that foot massage question, he gets this weird look in his eyes. He looks and sounds like a kid trying to deny eating all the cookies.


I never followed this case but I all of the sudden have so many questions.

You're right he sucks.
even the "did you?"
"I didn't. But if I did, it'd be good. But to be clear, I didn't"
"This guy who's job is to know says you  did."
"I... didn't... for sure."


His mother must be sooooo proud. Not to mention her shameless protection of him. Absolutely disgusting.


It’s sad he has to unlist many of these videos cause a lone YouTube employee will find and remove them under their own interpretation of what the YouTube guidelines should be. Cause God forbid we expose paedos in high places.


The way these "elites" speak 🤣. Lots of words without meaning


JCS: youtube is shutting us down
Me: loses all hope
Also me: finds this


I love how JCS barely even has to say anything in this video, it's just obvious


Notice how its always ‘i do not remember’ rather than ‘definitely no’ just incase he ever gets caught out with further photos or irrefutable evidence.


Interviewer: "another guest was John Brockman"<br>Andrew: 👁👄👁

Interviewer: "another guest was John Brockman"
Andrew: 👁👄👁

@Sheila Boston lol this was probably one of those 3am video binges I had and I became distracted soon afterwards because who needs sleep

@Alyse B Hope you haven't waited seven months for a reply and that you looked it up on google!

at first he was like "whoah really how did you know" and then he's like "i don't know this brockman guy"


It’s hilarious that these rich sex offenders always adamantly try and deny them ever knowing other rich sex offenders when there is PHOTO EVIDENCE of them together.


He's guilty as sin. Regardless of any court case EVERYONE already knows it.


Every body language expert on YT confirmed he was lying most of this interview? Actually he also borrowed money off epstein? His new York visits were more than just a conveinant place to stay 😂.


And this was a relatively “friendly” reporter (BBC) imagine of it was done by someone trying to bring him down….


"his house, I described it more as a as a as a railway station if you will, in the sense that people were coming in and out of that house all the time."<br>so like a brothel.

"his house, I described it more as a as a as a railway station if you will, in the sense that people were coming in and out of that house all the time."
so like a brothel.

😂😂😂😂😂 "Stupid" is this guys spirit-animal, obviously..

@GovPancake dont encourage such attention seekers

Don't let this distract you from the fact that I get bullied because my classmates think my videos are the worst. Please don't agree, dear ben


The way JCS said “so full of shit” hahaha the venom isn’t normally there but it’s great when it is!


Rich get interviewed, poor get interrogated!


No shit 😂,my little cousin is more convincing when he's telling me about father Christmas


Damn When I was watching this live I couldn’t help but think “I really hope JCS makes a video on this” Thanks for uploading!

Same! As soon as I saw the video,  I came straight to this channel to ask if JCS was going to do an analysis.

Saw it too and even I spotted things so I knew a video would be coming


He reminds me of my dog when he's done something he shouldn't have.


The Positive Act BS is really revolting. He thought this BS argument would lift him up a bit, the poor thing. Get a life, Andrew, will ya?


He's not good at lying because no-one has EVER questioned any of his prior actions or decisions - being surrounded by sycophants has made him feel entitled and invincible - well welcome to the real world where actions have consequences and you can't tread on the little people and get away with it - he's such a pompous oaf and always has been


Having not seen the Kevin Heart show with the clip you used, executed perfect!


“we’re not even close friends” <br>“i had to see him face to face to break off our friendship”

“we’re not even close friends”
“i had to see him face to face to break off our friendship”

Yeah, I caught that, and was like, “Didn’t know I had to meet with an acquaintance to end our friendship when we only see each other 2/3 times a year.”

He's a grub....he'll end up like ol Jeffrey

And while being there, he "wasn't LOOKING for anything suspicious". Why would you, when staying with a sex offender you're about to break up with...? Also, the reason he broke up with Epstein was all "this is bad for my reputation" and not "I think you're an asshole".

That part was like a TCaP clip. "I was only here to tell her I wasn't going to come over"

Hey! It is WEAK to breakup with your bff on the phone, you need to do it face-to-face and stay in their home for multiple days. That makes sense and it's normal. 😡

Maddie S Right. And he had to stay 4 nites for what reason? Waitin on the “help” to show up!

'he had this extraordinary ability to bring people together'

Hadn't seen him, he lied, since 2006 (4 years), but he has to see him (after FOUR years) to tell him he can't see him. Illogical.

....and remember according to Prince Andrew this is a full 4 years after they have had any contact at all after Epstein was charged with sex offences in 2006.

@Spastic - obviously he was exhausted from the plane trip. After due recuperation he was promptly on his way.

Most guys just quit taking a person's phone calls. They get the message soon enough. That saves you the travel time.

Even though I wouldnt have called us "close friends" to even justify that sort of gesture.

Let dumb people self incriminate is a mark of a good interviewer. To have pushed it would have probably shut him down.

Also Scottish, fully agree.

Why did he stay in a railway house, not knowing who the hell can be there and not caring about his personal security.

Five Star Productions are women paid the same as men at One Star Productions?

Yeah, I do the same, every facebook friend I delete I will first visit, break off, stay for multiple days.... you know, is that what honorable people do...

Oh, right. I'd make a terrible detective.

I know!he obviously doesn’t know about phone calls being an option seeing as he has lead such a ‘sheltered ‘ life being a royal!😂🤣only chickens use phones 🤣😃

And then spend four days at his house after the breakup

'we weren't close friends'<br>1 min later: 'we weren't very very close friends'

'we weren't close friends'
1 min later: 'we weren't very very close friends'

Maddie S wish she would have called him on that


The moment you chose to end the video is absolutely perfect.


I love the way JCS edited this and especially the ending.


So let me get this straight and up to date; the good sir in question has an argument for his innocence which is basically he was in the same building but never saw any noncery, and now he’s basically saying he doesn’t have to prove he’s innocent because this woman pursuing him legally now was already paid off by his ‘alleged’ nonce friends and although he didn’t “commit any act with them”, is included in that pardon party, is that correct?


sorry she delivered the last line magnificently "unbecoming? he was a sex offender"


You gotta hand it to our cousins “across the pond”! They can take the most deplorable subject matter and with that accent it becomes so refined and proper! 😂


I just watched that documentary last week and knew he was full of crap 😂


Wtf is he talking about "positive action??" Omg 🤣


“I didn’t know why people were there. His house was like a train station.” So like a trafficking house?

lol no he literally had trains running.. that poor naive prince andrew had no ideaaaaa

Also sounds like such a relaxing place to stay that would bring him back time and time again, ya know for convenience reasons apparently.

The extremely wealthy live in homes that are like hotels. There are people coming and going literally all the time.

DREAMTEAM MMA But offered to buy the one of Clinton wearing a dress... 🤢

I doubt Andrew has ever seen or used a working train station.  Those are for the peasants.

aughalough1 Well with all the EOs he has signed against trafficking and all the arrests on FBI.gov press releases that does seem ironic. With over 10,000 resignations worldwide of CEOs and political leaders etc on resignation.info and all the pedo and trafficking arrests his administration has been dismantling these global crime syndicates. Swamp has been draining for a while now. Plus more to come with over 120,000 sealed indictments filed since October 2017 on pacer.gov plus EO of 12/21/17 seizing assets of those involved in crimes against humanity has resulted in over 1,200 pages of seized assets on treasury.gov and we had IG  report that cited Hillary and Clinton Foundation for crimes against children. This is gonna be just the beginning

Go online and read, "Programmed to Kill: The politics of serial murder." Page 1- The Pedocracy.

@WinnieFindsTheWay  Very, very well said.

this whole interview is... A: open mouth... B: insert foot

Folks if u have seen the original BBC interview, please please like the video because the dislikes is killing the youtube algorithm and the word will not get round if you don't do it. Only 1M views, that is like 0.01% of the world.

Or perhaps like a very wealthy person's house?<br>He would have housekeepers, gardners, chefs, all kinds of staff and people walking in and out, in a house like that you would just not bother taking notice.

Or perhaps like a very wealthy person's house?
He would have housekeepers, gardners, chefs, all kinds of staff and people walking in and out, in a house like that you would just not bother taking notice.

sherri sanders   I like the <b>”ducks like a quack”</b> part.

sherri sanders   I like the *”ducks like a quack”* part.

N B so am I. I literally couldn't stop watching this sensational train wreck.

C'mon ride that train 🚉 and ride it, CHOO CHOO

C'mon ride that train 🚉 and ride it, *CHOO* *CHOO*

@DREAMTEAM MMA He didn't think it was odd that there were a lot of underage girls in the house.

@Nicholas Ovel perfect love this comment!

Makes sense that a senior royal would stay at a house where people are coming and going, at all hours and times a day, and his security staff would be totally ok with that.

He also thought the young children where staff, and he had not seen the framed pictures of young children all over the house.

And that's why, as a royal, it was the most convenient and quiet place to stay in NYC. Who doesn't like sleeping in a railway station?

That is because the place was a knocking shop (brothel).

@Kimberly Gagnon-Rix-Sletten birds of a feather and no disrespect to birds.

Exactly!! I was thinking the same thing!!

@PinkOld we have a built in computer that let's us know when danger is near but you have to be in tuned to your some call it guy instincts

A trafficking house running trains, apparently.

Places that have those sorts of things looks and feels like something shady is happening all around you or you get to a particular room you will feel something you just have to pay attention to your body


“New information has been coming out…since his suicide…” he made sure to use the word “suicide.” And I bet he has NOTHING to do with it. lol. Just a thought.


Around the 5.10 mark when he discusses the people he saw coming and going as staff is probably true - he treated this girl as staff to do his bidding and probably never asked her for consent or her age. She was just there for his use and I imagine this is his normal behaviour to others.


"you have to understand"  says it all...all of his life he got money from his momma...and that's how he used to live ...and the rest is just history !


I think this might be hardest JCS has gone in on someone. He's usually a little more subtle in his destruction of someone, but this was a harder beat down than usual, I think. You can feel JCS’ disgust of the entire situation seeping through every word, and I love it. JCS is the king of True Crime YouTubers.

@enemy his older videos primarily break down interrogations of criminals. This is a TV interview in a situation where we all KNOW the accused is guilty, but don't have the evidence to look at for context on the interviewer's side.

So Jim (very fairly in my opinion) decided to do a piece on criminal body language/how NOT to lie with the subject being someone that deserves universal hatred. He literally just has less reason to be completely impartial, and it's not like he still wasn't informative.
Without post-conviction hindsight this video literally can't be done like the others. If you want to argue that he just shouldn't make this video, I guess you could do that, but I'd then argue that he's free to do what he likes with his channel and pedophiles deserve this kind of public grilling and much worse, and that Jim is someone I'd find credible enough to hand that responsibility to.

@enemy it's much more entertaining this way and still equally true

idk I kinda like him being unbiased and explaining what exactly is happening and WHY the perp is behaving that way. it loses it's appeal when he just says "he's lying bc he's a piece of shit." like yeah ok i get that but can you just explain a bit more like your older videos

yea i was gonna say he makes his usual interjections but rapidly and continually ramps the language up from "sex offender" to "child rapist" to simply throwing memes into the video, where every other jcs video ive seen has the production quality and tone of a professional documentary.. burst out laughing at the "honour" comments


Emily Maitlis's interview is worth the entire cost of my TV Licence. And then some.


That head shaking and "I do not remember" would remind you of a 5 year old attempting to cover a lie. 🤢


He'll be OK, because he's white and royalty.


he acts the same as I used to in primary.

playing the part of confusion and deciding mid way if the lie should continue or not. I would replicate his exact mannerisms, little pauses trying to quickly make sure if i should deny my understanding of the scenario which is taking action, and stuttering trying to make sure i sound confused enough. distancing myself from the lie, and trying to find key points.


The fact that he thought doing this interview would clear the air and make him seem innocent shows you how far out of touch he is with reality.

An easy mistake to make. The interviewer found him very credible but to us he does not seem very persuasive.

@Sid Vicious .there was money involved but Jason Stein was hired to do Andrews PR he advised him not to do the interview and quit when he went ahead with it. Why would he hire someone and not get paid for the interview.

@Sid Vicious ..He got paid to do the interview and the tax payer paid for his sex.

He got paid by the bbc to do the interview thats all he cared about he thinks he is beyond internatonal law.

The so called royal family are all out of touch...he was told to go that interview he couldnt deny the request...

I doubt he thought this could clear his name, there is an Erick Weisntein interview where he says it better, but basically I think he just accepted to do this interview because he has been already denied any sort of help from the royal family and felt his time was comming anyway, he went to the interview without a plan because he thought there was no plan that can save him so he might as well go and say whatever he can come up on the spot, mocking how much the public has been worried about this when he clearly hasn't worried at all.

He's like rich men that think they can say racist things to the news media without any repercussions...

He probably thought the media would be too scared to call him out

@Kevin very well said. Felt almost profound reading it, have my upvote sir!

Actually we had a case like this in Sweden a couple of months back.. A famous guy that is a restaurant owner/brand owner/boxer and so on,  was caught in a police sting while raiding a prostitution apartment in Stockholm. He figured the smart move would be, to go on TV and bear a heavy heart.. It did not work out in his favour.
Though I do sincerly believe that this is not just for famous and rich, I do believe that this is applicable to all of us.. When we do bad things, we feel we need to address it, not to fix it, but to regain control over the situation because when it spirals out and down the drain we feel at loss of control... All people hate to have no control.

The only thing that differentiates us is wether we take responsibility for our actions or lie about our actions.
But both of these individuals have the same goal, and once again, it is not to fix it, it is to reclaim control.

Clearly in his own world. I didn't think money could buy stupid.


Wow!!  The most horrid liar I have ever seen!!!  Watch how many thousands of times he’s blinked alone!!!  Not to mention his non verbal shakes of his head.


Great video! Really thanks for the commentary to Kizzume !! Merry Christmas !


You know, and I would like to think that I can speak for everyone, J. T. Ripper and C. Manson, @0:40 clearly indicates, with believable hand gestures and solum and honorable facial expressions, that he has no idea and would not have been in a position to see anything.  So, there you go, he seems quite believable and very honest.


She is a very good forensic interviewer, she is patient, careful, puts clear questions, lets him answer without interruption, picks up only the essentials from his replies, she lets the liar hang himself with his own words.

Weird thing is this is a BBC interview......I actually think he was hung out to dry by the royal family......it's not like he'll end up in prison for crimes I'm sure he commited....but his big brother was great mates with jimmy savile.....and will be our king in 18 months apparently

She's far from it, she's one of our worse. That interview wouldn't have had questions that weren't already seen, it was totally scripted. No royal would have an interview without it. It was very soft and made out to look tough.

girl girl I agree, she was awesome, I don't how she was soooooo good.

Interview questions have been rehearsed and he knew how to answer it. But he still failed

Not really.

Andrew is a royal who lived his life tnot knowing shit came through his ass and when it was over he had to clean up after himself. Like the rest of the 99.99999% of the world.

So it didn't take much to see him hang himself in an interview where he is sat down and asked straightforwarded hard unpleasent questions.

Shit you and I could breeze through  without the need to be  coached but not a  blue blood.


You can tell he’s lying… all in the face


Through all the absurdity of this case, let's not forget the severity of it.


God over 2 years and this disgrace of a human still hasn't been given his dues.<br>Funny how he's not been outside in this time since.

God over 2 years and this disgrace of a human still hasn't been given his dues.
Funny how he's not been outside in this time since.

Ugandan Big Chungus Keanu Ebic Sussus Amogus Ligma


Hearing Andrew say, "I just came to say I wasn't coming" is the cleanest best pleasure.

He just wanted to say he stopped by on his way to his brother in Atlanta.

Dont mind me, im was just on my way to the beach

"I don't even want this doughnut. i just wanna get to the beach."

@Daryl Castillo I mean look at him, he's very professional

Does Andrew look like a dishonest, dirty person?

Plot twist interviewer gets up and Chris Hansen comes in saying "Andrew do you see how this sounds"

@DoctorPorkenfries So he thought this house is for sale?

He just came to talk to John Pederson about a construction job.

@Byron MacGreggor i was only there to make sure nothing suspicious was happening!

<b>I was only there to get directions on how to get away from there.</b>

*I was only there to get directions on how to get away from there.*

haha yes, at last the Prince has been properly seated

CH ought to marry this one


And this doesn't even include when he said he has a medical condition which causes him to be unable to sweat


This interview was the beginning of his comedown


Will we get the full video reinstated? This is such a small part of the original video, which is gold 💜


He just pulls faces like Jim Halpert through this whole thing…


He's lying so badly, it almost makes you think this is just a humiliation ritual.

@R P I got a similar feeling when this came out. Like he was told to/some how forced to take the heat off someone else involved

@R P You mean as in the interview was staged? These days, when something happens, my mind turns to both (sometimes 3 or more) sides of the story, trying to view the story from all involved's pov. I am so used to the media spinning the story to their own pov rather than just reporting straight facts. With this one, I thought, if it was fake, why would he do that? It would only make him look bad?

Now he is getting the humiliation he forced onto young girls.

Interesting observation I thought this was too weird

Kancer seriously. The transparency seems off


Heinrich Himmler would say " I don't really remember any camps per se; however, I did see a few people wearing pajamas and others getting off of trains, but I couldn't really tell you why they were there. "


this interview will go down as one of the single biggest PR disasters in history.


“If only it weren’t for his abundance of honor, he could’ve actually done something about it” 😂 I love when Jim roasts someone in his dry tone as he does


"I did not.. have sexual relations.. with that woman.."


00:53 Narrator enters script: "It was at this moment he knew, he f*©ked up" 🤣 👏


He's trying so hard to look offended and not guilty 💀


He & his lawyers are holding "emergency meetings" now that Maxwell has been convincted. lol.

I just find it a bit suspicious that the female was the only one who has been convicted, but not the males. I can’t wait for his trial tho lol


Wow. She’s a great interviewer. He’s also probably the worst liar I’ve ever seen.

CHARLIE o idk.....I think Bill and Hillary have managed to lie about Epstein pretty well over the years <br>Epstein would agree with this, but the Clintons killed him

CHARLIE o idk.....I think Bill and Hillary have managed to lie about Epstein pretty well over the years
Epstein would agree with this, but the Clintons killed him


I am watching this video whilst performing “ positive actions”


You ended the video just when it seemed it was about to get good lmao. Her face of pure disgust 😂


every other jcs video: this psychological state is known as ...<br>this video: he's full of shit lol

every other jcs video: this psychological state is known as ...
this video: he's full of shit lol


God he's awful, imagine having to have him as your father, son or brother


"There's almost never been a more guilty looking face in the history of journalistic investigation. If this were a soap opera, the director would likely tell the actor to 'tone it down' to leave some interpretation up to the viewer" 🤣😂🤣😂

I happened to read this exact as Jim said it. Priceless!!!

@Kristina Ch 100%  I agree lol Jim went extra hard but it's appropriate

2015 Bulldog Jim is such a savage in this one, I loved every second of it

@Christian Gasior Sub to him. Link in description.


WHAT IF HE ADMITTED TO THE ACCUSATIONS, THEN WHAT❓


"He described seeing you there getting a foot massage from a young Russian woman. Did that happen?"<br>"That's impossible, I don't have feet."

"He described seeing you there getting a foot massage from a young Russian woman. Did that happen?"
"That's impossible, I don't have feet."


Spit up my coffee when the youtube host throws in the comment "if this was a soap opera, right here the director would tell him to tone it down so it doesn't look like he is so full of shit"  HYSTERICAL


why did i want the interviewer to be rude to him hahahah??? she did a great job with this.


the look on his face when she mentions the guy who saw him getting a foot massage gives me an incredible amount of joy

@Oakleaf700 The suckER or the suckEE. LOL 😂😂😂

@Alma Murphy You may be right? It was a long time ago...I just remember the toe- sucking being linked to Fergie..🥴 Who was the sucker...or who was the sucked?? I'll have to google it :)

@Oakleaf700 I thought SHE was having her toes sucked..😂😂😂 There's actually a spy cam video, pool side I think.

And immediately says " I don't know that man".

His foot does look overly relaxed trough out the whole interview!


"Don't mess with my Teddy bears!😡"
  - Prince Andrew

"Don't mess with my Teddy bears!😡"
  *- Prince Andrew*


“Yes, I think I’ll go ahead and do the honorable thing and have this excruciatingly awkward conversation with my old pal Jeff to tell him I can never hang around with him again. I’ll stay at his house to tell him though because I can’t afford a hotel and I’ll make it doubly more uncomfortable for myself by hanging around there for several more days after I’ve broken the news to old Jeff and have a nice dinner with him and all the other old pals to show there’s no hard feelings. I’ll just have to try to ignore all those 14 year old girls coming in and out of the house though - they must be going there for religious instruction or ballet lessons or something.”


"Did you have sex with that girl? Ï don't remember anything!" Who in his right mind would respond in that way if the true answer was "No?"


This interview has the vibes of a Monty python flying circus’ sketch lol


3:25 I mean, thats literally the same reaction you'd expect to see from a 4 year old child that was asked if they stole a cookie when they did steal the cookie

That's the same exact comment I came here to post lol

@Bradley Houghton said too much but appreciate the known confirmation

i actually saw a video about a study that essentially showed that most adults can't reliably tell when a child is lying (not even if it's their own child)!! they have a 50% rate of guessing correctly because there are two options: lying or telling the truth. i think the video was a ted talk, and i'm not sure how reliable the speaker was so i could be entirely wrong tho :)

@Retro Plus hahahaha a kid in a suit. Priceless 😂😂

Yeah it's really disturbing, he's like a kid in a suit


youve got give probs to this interviewer, she manages to sit through this pile of crap facing a potential sex offender convicting himself


If he never done this interview you would have to say he may be innocent, but this interview just confirms he is more than likely guilty…. It’s so uncomfortable to watch.


its hard to take the government seriously when they refuse to do anything about pornhub or stripclubs.


"It was at this moment he knew he fucked up"


So he VOLUNTARILY did this interview?  I mean......oof.

he thinks he’s untouchable so he doesn’t care

Lesley Riseam - if you’re talking in regards of British history and mean Queen Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz who was born in 1744, and later became wife to George III, she was German. Mecklenburg-Strelitz was a North German duchy - so neither Portuguese or black, I’m afraid. Apologies if you were talking about another Queen not related to British royalty though!

Superkayko he’s a narcissist.  They think they can lie their way out of anything.  It’s great 😂

He must have been confident in his ability to lie his way out of it but clearly this is something he can't lie his way out of. he's probably not used to having so much evidence as to his whereabouts so he could maintain plausible deniability when he lied. or hes used to lying to people who won't doubt him.

Megham Markle is not the first person of colour  . There have  been Queens . Queen Charlotte  of Metzenburg Streliz . She was a black Portuguese  Princess . There has never been a law in the UK preventing mixed marriage.

@Stigg Mint if epstein had dirt on trump he would have never been arrested.  Trump's right hand man is Bill Barr.  Trump would just have hin stand down

@Richard Lefleur which is exactly why he paid someone to procure underage women in the first place. These royals are used to being able to get whatever they want with impunity.

@Snake right,! His looking at her like she's crazy is priceless!

It kind of reminds me of chris watts polygraph test when the lady tells him " you'd have to be really stupid to take this test if you were guilty "

He doesn't have the support of the royal family anymore. If you notice, his tie is messed up. Royals have handlers that fix their image before they make ANY KIND of appearences. The tie signals to me that he has been abandoned. He did this of his own accord. No one is helping him. Dude is F***ed.

Why wouldn't he? It's not like he will go to prison if he admits to anything.

The rest of the Epstein cult likely threw him under the bus and pushed him to do the interview. After all, he's untouchable.

He was so arrogant, he thought he could convince an entire nation of his self proclaimed innocence. It failed horribly.

It's the BBC, he's a Prince, he's not expecting to be questioned.

@Teds Lead Hat emporium well yeah... that goes without saying, we all know he did it to himself. I meant someone behind the scenes on "our" side. Whats funny is the general public didn't know much about it and then he did this disaster of an interview. But he is being used as a scapegoat, it goes much deeper, they need to focus more on bill clinton and most importantly – ghislaine

Axl Jax i think he threw himself under the bus

I feel like he was thrown under the bus purposely by whoever suggested this. Despite the evil in this world, there are good forces at work.

Equating Trump and Clinton’s involvement with Epstein. That’s rich.

When nobody challenges you, you think it's because you're a good liar.


When she asked Andrew about John Brockman he looked shocked...


Notice how he doesn't deny doing anything but instead doesn't remember.