The poor get interrogated, the rich get interviewed.

The poor get interrogated, the rich get interviewed.

Can you image that Falklands intensity that Prince Andrew speaks of? Those weird, wide eyed, face expressions,  Prince leaning forward, hands on joystick, sweat pouring off those Nobel sweat glands. Then suddenly... the adrenaline overload... sweat glands instantly stop functioning. The man's evolutionarily transformation to non sweating, from becoming to now unbecoming. If what Prince Andrew is said to be true. He will be remembered for many centuries, a mythological divine royal aristocrat, the second son of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, not just for military accolade, but the astonishing biochemical metamorphosis of the human organism.

Or just a queasy Pedo.

@Ricky Janzen nonsense.. interrogations go public as well

@Ricky Janzen nonsense.. interrogations go public as well

They sometimes give depositions too... If only the poor had that opportunity. Just stay in that cell for 6 months until we find a public defender.

This was a public interrogation, dressed up as an interview

This was a public interrogation, dressed up as an interview

@Scott Keys so perhaps the generalisation doesn’t apply to you then. That’s the nature of generalisations.

@MegaLotusEater being white and working class myself I see no truth in that statement.

@MegaLotusEater being white and working class myself I see no truth in that statement.

@Scott Keys yup it is a generalisation. But it has a lot of truth to it.

@Scott Keys yup it is a generalisation. But it has a lot of truth to it.

@MegaLotusEater sweeping generalisations much?

@MegaLotusEater sweeping generalisations much?

This is a TV interview though, he will be interogatted if he goes to trial

This is a TV interview though, he will be interogatted if he goes to trial

@Erik Larson  when you have high fame all of your private business is out for the world to see…had nothing to do with being rich lots of rich people that have no public presence.

Damn that's fucking heavy.. the average man gets brought into the police station and prince Andrew gets a fucking TV appearance.

This is honestly a better way of getting a genuine response from someone or at least you’d get there fulll and true reaction because the pressure of the law is not there

@MW856 Its very perplexing.  I think maybe Her Majesty stepped in and insisted upon it.

@MW856 Its very perplexing.  I think maybe Her Majesty stepped in and insisted upon it.

@C Mauro that might be good idea.. especially the city I'm in.

@C Mauro that might be good idea.. especially the city I'm in.

@Paul Colburn This interview appears to be the result of an immature, spoiled man-child who was never forced to be accountable for his actions. The perplexing aspect is the fact that his handlers allowed it in the first place.

You will become a quote in my book, sir.

You will become a quote in my book, sir.

“Unbecoming…? He was a sex offender” LMAO

“Unbecoming…? He was a sex offender” LMAO

@Ricky Janzen That's why I like true crime documentaries

@Ricky Janzen That's why I like true crime documentaries

To be fair interrogations nowadays are very much like interviews - don't be fooled to jump to your romanticised perception of police interrogation.

@Labiba Binte Mahabub The US have been trying to extradite him. Obviously, the British royals won't allow it. For once, I am in agreement with the US government

The rich buy a lawyer who instructs them not to talk to the police*

The rich buy a lawyer who instructs them not to talk to the police*

@Angamaitë Sangahyando communists aren’t nihilists despite the garbage you’ve been taught. libertarians are nihilists

@Sean Neal very little reason to be optimistic nowadays. delusional positive bias isn’t going to help with necessary social changes

@R He WAS the only one of Elizabeth's 4 children that was worth a damn.  He served his country in a war.  He was something good.  And he wound up being the worst.

@Erik Larson yeah if noticing that there’s an unfair standard is jealousy than call me kermit the frog cause I’m green with envy

Took me a while to figure which one prince andrew is

Took me a while to figure which one prince andrew is

And the citizens who have allowed are as guilty as anyone. I blame my grandparents for not revolting, they handed it down to us

@MW856 No one can figure out what compelled Prince Andrew to give such a ridiculous interview answering questions with so facial tells and pantomimes that any 4 year old  could tell it was all lies.  Who forced him to take this interview?  He went down with the ship  This was the most ridiculous interview I have ever seen and it was glorious in identifying a man who simply didn't care how it portrayed him.

This is more like an interrogation disguised as an interview

This is more like an interrogation disguised as an interview

@darnell pistachio Tell me, why would the Prince have taken this interview if not for a direct command from his mum the Queen?

@Ricky Janzen except an interrogation actually involves you getting hold accountable for it

That’s how it is. It’s not going to change. We need some hierarchy in society. All we can do is improve our ability as the proletariat/bourgeois, to hold the rich accountable

Was Jeffrey Espstien poor? I'm confused.

Was Jeffrey Espstien poor? I'm confused.

*The ruling class is interviewed, the rest are interrogated

*The ruling class is interviewed, the rest are interrogated

The poor gets interrogated, The Royal Family member gets interviewed 20 years later.

The poor gets interrogated, The Royal Family member gets interviewed 20 years later.

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.<br>- Adûnâi

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.
- Adûnâi

And in Epstein's case, the poor serve full prison time and the rich get a plea bargain.

And in Epstein's case, the poor serve full prison time and the rich get a plea bargain.

Wow... That’s exactly right! I’ve never thought of it that way.

Wow... That’s exactly right! I’ve never thought of it that way.

I am absolutely certain that his mom (the Queen) insisted that her son give this interview or ELSE be ex-communicated from the family.  There simply is no other logical reason why such an interview be granted.

That's the way it is,life"s a bitch for many,no?

That's the way it is,life"s a bitch for many,no?

The poor need to prove they are not guilty.

The poor need to prove they are not guilty.

anyone that thinks this statement is true isnt optimistic at all

anyone that thinks this statement is true isnt optimistic at all

@Rob G The rich can afford lawyers. Your stuck with a court appointed public defender if your poor and good luck with that.

For some reason they want to pick the rich's brain to find out why what, but the poor less fortunate gets convicted of the same crimes without question

@zejd land you thought what? That you couldn't convey your point clear enough, so it took you an entire other comment for you to say something coherent, and then when you did make a coherent comment it was based on assumptions and generalizations? If that's what you thought than yes you are correct.

The poor rott in jail, the rich never set a foot in jail

The poor rott in jail, the rich never set a foot in jail

@FMJ_wolf no it's not I meant putting that soldier into a psychiatric help for say 2 months also a soberty check if into
Treatment then holding this soldier untill he finds a job or give him one.
Giving him money won't solve stuff...lets learn him to live in a productive society

@zejd land this is just a dumb comment all around, for your sake please don't ever comment publicly on any subject.

The poor get caught in 144p on a security camera, the rich get caught in 4k UHD by a professional camera.

@C Mauro socialism and social help is different that soldier would use this money for drugs

@C Mauro socialism and social help is different that soldier would use this money for drugs

@Labiba Binte Mahabub the ordinary man would be in jail until the investigation was completed...and even then, we consider the man guilt unless he can afford a lawyer to prove his innocence. The elite aren't even close to everyone elses reality.

and they support socialism and globalizm.. .

and they support socialism and globalizm.. .

Sometimes because the Rich get lawyers lol

Sometimes because the Rich get lawyers lol

How accurate...if half the things that have come out about Andrew came out about an ordinary man there will have been an investigation about him by now at the very least

Yes right you are this is just sickening 🤬

Yes right you are this is just sickening 🤬

@Conor Corrigan I would avoid the sun for "evidence". As they are perpetually caught up in libel cases, phone tapping cases, and breaking many other very reasonable rules of law.

Many in the UK consider "The Sun" to be a Tabloid, because of the frequency in which they are caught lying/misleading people. There is a twitter page dedicated to pointing out "The Sun" lies...its somewhat subjective, but it does give many creditable demonstrations against "the sun".

Don't get me wrong, Im not saying your assertion is wrong, there are much more creditable sources for your submission. Let's not legitimize a Tabloid for its ability to periodically corroborate reality while it is consistently caught acting in bad faith practices.

In all ways the rich get treated better. Just imagine, we wouldn't have jobs with out them...right? Wait a minute. People have been worshipping other people forever...so lets keep doing it...yeah.

Americans:  Wait, you guys are getting questions before the bullets?

Americans:  Wait, you guys are getting questions before the bullets?

Ricky Janzen plus Police Tapes can get gag orders and locked away. This is forever

Ricky Janzen plus Police Tapes can get gag orders and locked away. This is forever

What a great idea.  I'm going to the court house and approach convicted strangers for an interview.  Start my own channel.

@Ricky Janzen true true, I didn't think about it like that

@Ricky Janzen true true, I didn't think about it like that

This seems like a universal truth. Or not. Maybe just jealousy.

This seems like a universal truth. Or not. Maybe just jealousy.

Well, the interviews are generally more accessible so us common folk can watch their bumbling than police interrogations, so there's that, at least.


Her face when she said “unbecoming? He was a sex offender” is absolutely priceless

@Joe Dorben sorry to ruin your judgement but I don’t like k-pop 😌

@YungRetroGamer what's wrong in watching anime?

@Kate Phillips Thank you very much, I can understand  it now!

@KolyaNick thank you so much , I see now!

@IlFB forever It means that someone's behaviour is inappropriate or unattractive, and that it doesn't suit their appearance, character or reputation.

@IlFB forever also it's unusual to use Unbecoming as a standalone word..  but it would probably have sounded even worse if he articulated a bit more..

@IlFB forever Unbecoming of someone suitable for association with a member of royalty... Another example is a military court martial due to conduct unbecoming of an officer...

What means "unbecoming"?Sorry I am not an English native speaker!

Understatement of the Century, am I right?

@YungRetroGamer what does that have to do with anything? 🤔

She looked like she had a mouth full of shit. She was disgusted, as most of us were with the “unbecoming” comment. If he wasn’t so entitled and self-important, he could have come out of that interview in a better position but he doesn’t live in the real world and it’s easy to see that.

She said “Unbecoming?!” Like “Draaaake?!”

@lewis johnson my fav bit is the ludicrous way he says 'party, partying, partied'.

@Nasibu Nyahunzvi exactly. It was the wtf moment.

@millenniumf1138 her composure was still kept….. she merely called out his bs downplaying of it

Right? During the whole interview she kept her composure until that moment when he said something so irretrievably stupid that even a British journalist can't keep it together. Truly a golden moment in this video.

@YungRetroGamer omg YRG!? yung retro gamer! yooo big fan


Emily is such a amazing journalist, she remains cold, unbiased and just lets his guilt speak for itself

Omg thousands are still watching this video... just think about it. We know that he is guilty but we can't do anything.


His inability to be convincing really shows how greatly he’s lived a life of privilege and never been in  a uncomfortable situation for the most part

@okisoba i was aiming at self made in the most top tier elite way. People who have amassed immense wealth on the premise of hard skill (undeniable) had to sell/bullshit their way through investors, stock holders, workers, clients and media. There are manny such bullshiters on the Epi scandal plane list that basicaly got out unscatheted. Him being a royal is a special breed of unquestioned  privilege based in centuries old succession with no inherent value. Not to mention the gravity of his accusation which even the poor bullshitters wouldn't be involved with, let alone get away with it.

@JB You can be self made without bullshitting. There are careers out there other than sales/politics where technical ability/hard knowledge are desired more than bullshit ability. If you grow up around bullshitters, and don't face consequences at home for being one, you'll likely be one as well, regardless of privilege. The idea that to not have money and influence means you should be more adept at being a liar annoys the crap out of me.

@okisoba yes, privileged people who are self made. They had experience of hustle  and a need to bullshit. He's a spoon feed royal with no need for it cause his background bailed him out of trying or having to explain himself. Up to a certain point.

He’s always been regarded as an aberration.

I was thinking the same thing. “Surely mother will fix this before it gies in the air”.

Some people who aren't privileged aren't comfortable lying. It's a matter of values. A lot of privileged people are extremely comfortable with lying. As well, there are people on the bottom of the economic and social ladder who were taught it's dishonorable and bad for your soul to lie.


"If this was a soap opera, the director would probably tell the actor to tone it down a little bit to at least give the viewer a shred to doubt that he's not completely full of sh*t" LMAO IT KILLED ME

The channel is above and beyond other channels!

He reminds me quite strongly of Steve Carell's character 'Michael Scott' from The Office (US).

Love it when JCS is ruthless in it's monotoned professional manner.

Same here I was cracking up I wasn’t expecting that form this guy🤣

got me too, JCS isn't normally that direct, caught me off guard. Also at the end, the perfect cut right after "...In manner unbecoming. Yes!... Unbecoming? he was a sex offender... "<br>lol

got me too, JCS isn't normally that direct, caught me off guard. Also at the end, the perfect cut right after "...In manner unbecoming. Yes!... Unbecoming? he was a sex offender... "
lol


I love how direct yet gently she asked these pointed questions. Her tone didn’t change. She did a great job

@Richella River me when i just say shit on the internet without looking it up:

@Michael Hutchings you’re not a conservative lol. Nice try tho

@Brianna Waldorf british media isn’t amazing. They’re giving him an out and he isn’t smart enough to take it🤣

Yeh she was awesome. So calm and collected and toed him in knots

@Jack Smith ummmm BEST COMMENT!! Right on the money!!

I really do like her. Never seen her do a bad interview

Andrew: I really did not know what is going on. That is code for he knew what was going on and thought he could get away with it because he is royal shit

@Rob Newton  May not be the same one then, but in most cases someone "beat" Shapiro, it was a petty war going on and who could be most snarky without looking snarky won. In those cases Shapiro looked like a grade A idiot because he was, and the other side looked like a grade B idiot since they could hide it better

I'm sure he lost his composure in multiple interviews but I'm also too lazy to look up this specific one

@10th letter : Andrew Neil, if we’re talking about the same interview.  Took Shapiro to the cleaners.

@Brianna Waldorf :  yep, that was Andrew Neil.  He’s one of the medias sharpest.

@Robert Bonsley you do better in one take live recording inside the guys Palace, and not to risk he gets up n walks out.

True. Good job. She hid her, I assume, perplexed state perfectly.

Ben crapiro can’t handle anyone apart from college kids

The best of British sitting opposite the very worst.

The best of British sitting opposite the very worst.

@Richella River shapiro has won battles with some peers if you search here

Did she? Why not just be candid, that he is clearly lying

Blackburn, Lancashire , England , UK, (BREXIT)

She is the super professional journalist in any kinds of situations. Even after taking this interview and being asked about how she felt with Andrew’s answers, she still defended him politely and felt grateful of having a chance to talk with him.

@London Sapphire
Absolutfckingly yes

He’d have been literally
BURIED
By end of interview

@Richella River cap. You’re just a mad liberal

@Richella River cap. You’re just a mad liberal

@London Sapphire  Nancy Grace: "WHY WERE YOU WITH THOSE LITTLE GIRLS!?"

she did a great job of all that she did..
but then failed to follow through at the end with the really juicy questions - like
"is it really in the twenty first century appropriate to have the UK's head of state chosen by an accident of birth that will always provide us with a white person ?"
"and your mother in her reign has presided over many crimes perpetrated by the state inc the castration of black men with mallets, the ritual killing of a young man with learning difficulties, the rounding up of the dogs of people living on the Chagos Islands before they were gassed to death and the people themselves deported from their own country, and still to this day selling weapons to murderous tyrants around the world.. aren't your actions and your words here just one more indication of how thoroughly and disgustingly corrupt the whole system is ??"

@Brianna Waldorf To be fair Andrew Neil was the best we had

@Richella River  I find it amusing that everyone time someone on the left talks about someone on the right, they just call it babbling because they know the points they do have are clearly better than your own.

Shapiro is quite imperfect, he cracks under pressure and is a bit of a narcissist. That doesn't make everything he says as false nor does it make most of his points unintelligent.

@Brianna Waldorf  He just insulted him, I remember the interview with Piers or whomever. Ben Shapiro acted like a douche there but no, I disagree

@Michael Hutchings what are you trying to conserve?

@Michael Hutchings what are you trying to conserve?

how dare she question a crown prince in that fashion? she would do well to remember her station and that she is speaking to royalty!

The most respectful and professional interview I’ve seen. She kept to the facts which made him look even worse.

@Michael Hutchings what’s necessary to conserve things properly?

You clarly haven't seen her hostile interview of that Hungarian politician about the refugees

This is fairly common in British journalism. Particularly on the larger televised news channels. You won't find a journalist shouting or raising their tone because they want to expose those emotions in the person they're interviewing, not themselves.

Ashley Banfield would have nailed this interview. She did a great job with Stephen Bertollino, the attorney for the Laundries

@London Sapphire Lol what a train wreck that would be

@London Sapphire Lol what a train wreck that would be

@Brianna Waldorf Tbf, Shapiro can't handle anyone who isn't an unprepared college student. He hopes speaking quickly will make him appear intelligent and not make people realise his nonsensical babbling is just ... Babbling.

Seriously! The line at the very end was a beautiful example of that - calmly but firmly tearing him to shreds.

Can you imagine if Nancy Grace did this interview?!

Can you imagine if Nancy Grace did this interview?!

Emily Maitlis is an extraordinary journalist.

Emily Maitlis is an extraordinary journalist.

British media is amazing at this. This interview reminds me of when the conservative reporter interviewed ben Shapiro and called him out on his hypocrisy and he walked out of the interview because he couldn’t handle the heat. I love British reporters.


"his house was like a railroad station... people coming in and out"

yeah, a sex trafficking hub

@Rom 3636 BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Me jeff would “run trains” all night long,

Poor choice of words with poor choice of facial expressions.. Fatal combo


"Unbecoming?? He was a sex offender!" I love this woman and I hope only good things for her holy cow

Edit: I realize my mistake of forgetting that commas exist, my bad.

Also being a gay furry is a lot better than being a Nintendo fan.

@Ivraj Plaha honor on her, honor on her cow!

The most American comment I’ve ever read


Because he's never had to lie before. People like him have teams in place to prevent this line of direct questioning. When it becomes apparent that anyone near him could find themselves implicated in any number of seriously outrageous offenses the team abandons him, and whatever sense of protection he knew has vanished. Left to fend for himself, he flails.

Now compare Prince Andrew to someone like Casey Anthony, who based her entire life on lies and managed to lie herself out of an obvious homicide. Lying is an acquired skill and those who have never had any use for it won't know how to do it. It's like speaking another language innit


When he actually laughs in relief after she says, "Jeffrey Epstein is dead" is amazing. I'm surprised more hasn't be said about that response.


can't believe the daily mirror labeled harry and meghan's interview with oprah "the biggest royal crisis in 85 years" when this interview exists

In fairness, everyone knows who Harry and Meghan are (thanks to Meghan's hunger for self-promotion). But most British people, and 90% of non-British people, have no idea who this guy actually is and what his connection is to the Royal Family.

They are supposed to be the distraction, stop noticing...

@rafer Jefferson iii wow, your priorities and views are totally skewed. I don't even know what to make of all that.

It's almost like the whole scandal around Harry and Meghan were a distraction the whole tome.

The royals for lack of a better word “own” the British media

Yep they are scapegoats for this whole thing. Them leaving the royal family -major distraction from this and also -ooh well at least some of us don't approve show.

Why would you read the Daily Mirror anyway?!

You sould have put a full stop after "I can't believe the daily mirror" and left it at that.

Only people who are not loved read those “daily” UK newspapers

@Thomas Hubbard This is the BBC not the Daily Mail. You can see the watermark at the top-left

Are you actually surprised? I mean COME ON, its the DAILY MIRROR. lol

Prince Andrew isn’t a woman or half black.

They labeled it the biggest royal crisis in 85 years BECAUSE this exists

Don’t give the narcissist any more attention. She’s not as innocent as she presents herself.

It’s because he’s connected to the individuals that control the information that trickles down throughout the world

it still was though, this is terrible also

I think the reason the harry and Meghan thing was blown up so much by the media was to take the eyes off of prince andrew

Oh my god I just thought my youtube glitched when I looked at your profile pic. Nice picture you got there :D

@Adam its not only the "royal" royals, look that Bil1 G4tes interview where that lady ask her a about the priv4te island guy, theres yt videos about pros like pcs deconstructing their bs.

Because they don't want to commit suicide in prison, if you catch my drift...

I had no idea it was this obvious, the whole thing is treated like some obscure rumor, but it's so obvious he's fucking lying!

Diverting attention from him had a godsend.

@Erica Fors thank you,  that was my thoughts too.

Thank you! Right?! That was the aim I'm assuming. To divert attention from him. 😡

If they refuse to acknowledge it, most people won't see or hear of it

@Angamaitë Sangahyando what embarassing humour

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.<br>- Adûnâi

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.
- Adûnâi

wonder how much money the DM gets on the DL from the Royal Purse

@TJ no not really I'd say pedophilia>racism

@George A. Custer wait what? Where? Think I can find it on YouTube?

dont forget camillas and charles openly racist and childish behaviors caught literally in 4k l


"Unbecoming? He was sex offender."<br>best. interviewer. ever.

"Unbecoming? He was sex offender."
best. interviewer. ever.

@Josh Lynch they said best interviewER ever

@Josh Lynch I dont know, the interview on countdown with Iggy pop stoned out of his fucking mind is pretty bloody good 😂

Not the best interview ever, but it was good. Corey Worthington’s interview on ACA remains the best interview ever.

Talks a bit like Diana, hope she doesn’t meet the same end.


His legal defence is not "I didn't do it, I don't remember, I don't even know this girl"

His legal defence is that the girl signed an NDA saying she would not accuse him.

Tells you everything you need to know

How the fuck is that not witness tampering

@Alisha S its gonna happen, seeing whats happened to Harry and Meghan and now Andrew, for the first time ever I feel like its gonna happen in my lifetime or if it doesn’t well who cares they don’t have a say in my life anyway

omfg. I hope in the coming years we finally abolish the monarchy.


I hope they gave this interviewer a raise. She was so professional with her questions and prior knowledge.

It's Emily Maitlis - she's a very well respected journalist in the BBC, has been the anchor for Newsnight for a while as well as doing election coverage


His condescending attitude when he tries to "teach" a grown woman that men can't forget having sex because they take "positive" action to have it is infuriating. Also, does he think women would forget? I assume he's used to prostitutes and sex slaves who just lie there and take it, and have to go through multiple guys a day, because his argument makes no sense.

@darren baugh yes! Same! Like dude what are you even saying? He is not used to explaining himself to ppl who can call him out it seems. Lol

Also as far as I can tell…. Men can in-fact forget having sex.  Just to clarify

Exactly! He's confessed to his crimes without confessing to his crimes.

@Boo Hoo it's out of complete insecurity.

I am completely confused by that line of reasoning and I wish the interviewer would have pursued it a bit more. Still well done on her part overall.


“Unlawful sex with a minor” is quite a friendly way to say child rape

“Unlawful sex with a minor” is quite a friendly way to say child rape

@choblgobblrr Only 12 US states have 18 as the age of consent. 31 US states have 16 as the legal age of consent and a handful including Illinois and New York have it at 17. So I'm sorry, but you are incorrect on that. Even US Federal law sets age of consent at 16, but individual states can choose to go higher, hence the differences you see between states. Maybe you should at least do a google search on the topic before making false statements like that.

@BNFA 713TX it doesn’t end, our freedom will lead us to the edge of a cliff

@BNFA 713TX it doesn’t end, our freedom will lead us to the edge of a cliff

You guys use "child" to refer at ppl of age 0 to 17 but there are big differences on these ages: Babies, toddlers, kids, tweens, teenagers, young adults and finally adults.

Or rape in general I highly doubt someone like Andrew limits his prince powers to tween and teen girls you bet he’s taken advantage of adult friends women .

@Sleeping Dog Carlin was also famously liberal.

@Sleeping Dog Carlin was also famously liberal.

Probably toned down so they could play the interview multiple times a day

Probably toned down so they could play the interview multiple times a day

@darnell pistachio “The age of consent is lower than 18 in every single state.” That isn’t true. And it also depends on civil VS criminal laws, so most states have the age of consent at 18.

@black101velvet nobody said the boy was convicted as a pedophile. Reading comprehension is a real thing.

@Circle Walker there is such thing as "lawful sex with a minor." genius.

@Circle Walker there is such thing as "lawful sex with a minor." genius.

@p Bosquez no you dont. You elect bill clinton.

Donald trump was on the list. Hes a conservative. He went once.

Bill clinton was on the list. Hes a liberal. He went several times and for longer periods.

@choblgobblrr no. Most states in the us do NOT have an 18 year old age of consent. The age of consent is lower than 18 in every single state. There are stipulations, but the right to consent is still there.

@IzabelParis prepubescent child is not the linguistic opposite of late teen. Prepubescent child is the linguistic opposite of postpubescent child. Which is what a 17 year old is.

@찰떡파이 idc about your trigger warnings. Grow up.

@찰떡파이 idc about your trigger warnings. Grow up.

@Illarion Bykov that last one about a boy being registered as a pedofile for hugging a classmate, was there a case about that? Is there an article or something? It's the first time I've read about something like that and I'm genuinely horrified if this is indeed true

Gary Roberts those are some “state laws” which only applies to high school students (18) to engage in relationships with someone who’s 14-15. The federal law is 18.

@choblgobblrr , no less than half of the states have an age of consent of 18. Being ignorant does not change the facts.

"Unlawful sex with a minor" implys there is "lawful sex with a minor."

"Unlawful sex with a minor" implys there is "lawful sex with a minor."

Gary Roberts Not true. Most states in the US is 18.

Gary Roberts Not true. Most states in the US is 18.

It’s literal sex trafficking of VULNERABLE individuals (happens so that young people MINORS and CHILDREN are more likely financially unstable and easier to manipulate) gross

@ngc 5139 You want to finish that thought or is that all you wanted to say?

@ngc 5139 You want to finish that thought or is that all you wanted to say?

@Bella Flores How liberals think love has no age and those words are apparently hurtful.

@Hatsune Miku Legal terminology is very precise. It will depend on what jurisdiction it happened in and the exact nature of the offense. The crime might be called: sexual assault, rape of a child, corruption of a minor, unlawful sex with a minor, carnal knowledge of a minor, unlawful carnal knowledge, sexual battery, etc. Sometimes these names will describe exactly the same crime or, what would be one crime in one place might be a series of crimes in another.

How is it not “statutory rape”, how is it different in the law?

How is it not “statutory rape”, how is it different in the law?

He was being polite.... and honourable. Becoming of a prince of the royal family

@little my Depends on the age and what country. If a 20-year-old has consensual sex with a 17-year-old It can be sex with a minor and legal. If it´s with say a 13 and 11-month-old child, even if consensual, it is a crime.

Well a minor can be up to 17, but you wouldn’t exactly call them a child. It’s more clear if you say minor

@IzabelParis you don't have children do you.....

@IzabelParis you don't have children do you.....

Umatsu Obossa no one ever said the bbc wasnt involved in us politics. in fact, i said the opposite in my comment. im saying this particular interview has no reflection on any us parties or political figures, since the person it's centered around is a member of the british royal family. to make the claim the wording used by the reporter is propaganda for us democrats is ridiculous.

@some idiot You're living under a rock if you don't think the BBC is involved with US politics

CREOLE DADDY propaganda in favor of who? yeah we can talk about how biased the media is until we're blue in the face but this particular interview has no relation to US politics.

It s it meant it be friendly or unfriendly. It’s a law term.

It s it meant it be friendly or unfriendly. It’s a law term.

IzabelParis if the age of consent in a state is higher than 17 then yes they are

I think it might be a legal term.  Such as "Criminal Sexual Conduct involving a minor under 12"  is a legal term.  Any sexual conduct with someone under 12 is criminal, aka child rape.  It is just how the law was written.

Marlon Lyn agreed. All I said was that. Massive difference between a pre-pubescent child and a late teens.

There's no such thing as an underage woman. That would be called a teenager or a child

BNFA ! what are you even talking about dawg

BNFA ! what are you even talking about dawg

Reila Nimu legally a minor cant consent to sex with an adult. even if they say they are consenting in the eyes of the law its a form of rape.

@the2theOnly no, not really. We live in a strange time when genuine child kidnappers get away with it if they're rich, but innocent men who never touched anyone get put in jail on false allegations and little boys get registeted as "sex predators" for hugging a classmate

Child rape is triggering. It made me feel uncomfortable seeing it as im a victim too. I much prefer the other way.

w77eed I know right. What the hell is an underage woman? That’s a CHILD. Are we gonna start calling babies “immature teens”???

IzabelParis Sorry but law says 17 is a child. Even though a relationship between an 18 year old and a 50+ year old is legal, it’s still weird as shit.

@IzabelParis But they are underage and thus a minor.

@IzabelParis But they are underage and thus a minor.

That is called a euphemism. And people like him, the media, the catholic church all regularly use them. Very popular these days actually.

Specifically "unlawful" sex with a minor. You know, as opposed to the OTHER kind.

Of course if you check you will see the age of consent in some American States is 16, in others 17

BBC: Accused of having sex with an underage woman.

BBC: Accused of having sex with an underage woman.

CoD33 Yes it does. Minors cannot consent, it is legally rape.

CoD33 Yes it does. Minors cannot consent, it is legally rape.


This guy would’ve looked less guilty if he just said, “I don’t know who Jeffery Epstein is”


It's absolutely crazy that part of his defence is: "How could I forget having sex with a girl if sex is good and you don't forget good shit" 🤮

Even if it turns out to be a little bit rapey it can only be positive. That was one of the most sick things I've ever heard my God


I love that most of the JCS videos are all taken seriously, and understandably so with such grim subject matters, but this video is a little whimsical simply because Andrew's defenses of himself are so absurdly unconvincing that it becomes funny. It's like playing L.A. Noire but IRL.


He’s either not very good at lying, or he’s brilliant at pretending to be a liar.

And the truth is that there is no great lier when underpressure by smart people (knowing what you did)

@Aditya Er no, its painfully  obvious  he is liying ??? Lol

He's not the best liar, but is very confident in front of the camera. The secret was his calmness in front of the camera, which didn't make it obvious to a normal watcher who knows nothing about body language/speech etc.


Interviewer: "Do you breathe everyday?"<br>Andrew: "No, no nope. Not everyday, but often. Well, often is a stretch, I may have breathed once or twice, but rarely ever, in fact I do say its hard to even remember a time where I have breathed."

Interviewer: "Do you breathe everyday?"
Andrew: "No, no nope. Not everyday, but often. Well, often is a stretch, I may have breathed once or twice, but rarely ever, in fact I do say its hard to even remember a time where I have breathed."

In fact, I had a medical condition that made it impossible for me to breathe! Truth be known, I'm struggling to breathe right now! Also, it's virtually impossible to breathe while you're eating pizza, and damn difficult to breathe when you're getting your foot (or any other part of your anatomy) massaged by a naked, sexy, Russian assistant!

"I have this medical condition and as a result I'm not ever aware of my breathing, so I have to say that I'm not entirely sure."

@clray123 gold 🤣🤣🤣

KM Hemmans The Youtuber

@clray123 gold 🤣🤣🤣

KM Hemmans The Youtuber

Sound like something beteljuice would say although beteljuice is a legend unlike andrew

No, no breathing, well I guess I have brethed once, when I [insert exuse here] but overall I haven't or dont remember breathing other than that.

"Me? No, never. Once in a blue moon I does..."

"Me? No, never. Once in a blue moon I does..."

@BaileyRob <br>You're the greatest for that one 😂🙌

@BaileyRob
You're the greatest for that one 😂🙌

😂😂😂 goodness,  this is so funny and yet possible with this 'honorable' man!!

😂😂😂 goodness,  this is so funny and yet possible with this 'honorable' man!!

Prince Andrew has every right to knock off a little just like any other Man, as long as the ladies he banged were of legal age he should be left alone,  just because he associated with someone who had a track record of messing around with under age females doesn't Make Prince Andrew guilty of wrong doing, I think being a member of the Royal family brings an unusual amount of attention and scrutiny I wouldn't wish upon anyone.  The Queens sister Margaret liked to party her ass off, she cheated on every husband she had and was off the chain in her personal life. But that's just it,  her personal life, last I checked it's not against the law for being human.

youngjdef this comment made me burst out laughing 😂

youngjdef this comment made me burst out laughing 😂

Omg this comment is everything I’m fucking done 😆 💀

Omg this comment is everything I’m fucking done 😆 💀

You are sooo funny:) you made me smile thanks

You are sooo funny:) you made me smile thanks

Beautiful, and all the others who ran with this theme.

Beautiful, and all the others who ran with this theme.

If there was a yearly award for best comment on YT this one would’ve took the 1st place 🥇

@Juliet Plot twist my name actually Robert :P

@Juliet Plot twist my name actually Robert :P

Unfortunately an injury I suffered in the Falklands means I can no longer breathe

Unfortunately an injury I suffered in the Falklands means I can no longer breathe

I wish he would read your post and all of the reactions it has inspired. Might take him down a peg or at least heart feelings. Lol

I know im late to the " Party ", but anyways... beautiful comment

I know im late to the " Party ", but anyways... beautiful comment

"... and without putting too far a point to it,  if you are a man, it's a positive act to breath..."

I have , I mean had this rare medical condition where I couldn't breathe at that time.  I have now, over the years been able to learn to breathe.

Christopher Stone my thought exactly! This would make a wonderful episode of Epstein Towers?

"At that time, I didn't actually breathe due to stress from the Falklands. I had a little man from the Palace to do all my breathing for me."

I might have once... Once!  inhaled... But say that I've exhaled, is a bit of a strech.

“No, absolutely no, I don’t have lungs, you see”

“No, absolutely no, I don’t have lungs, you see”

trump: a lot of people agree that Prince Andrew sometimes occasionally breathes. Bigly!

@Florida Island Girl I've never heard that before about him. I have heard that about the FBI that watched Killery on Weiners' laptop. Some execrable stuff.

Ahh he’s a Muppet 💡<br>One of the two guys in the box seats that reviewed the performances

Ahh he’s a Muppet 💡
One of the two guys in the box seats that reviewed the performances

The trouble is, I'm far too polite to breathe... I'll accept a bit of oxygen into my lungs for a mere moment but it would be a stretch to call it breathing..

"Well, no, I have no recollection of breathing. Maybe I breathed once, but there was just so much air moving in and out that I certainly don't remember it. I don't personally know the person that said that I breathed, so I don't know why they would say such a thing. I mean, I wouldn't call it breathing, it was more like inhaling - a little bit of air went through my nose, but you have to understand - I would absolutely not call it breathing. I would know, because you see, as a man you have to breathe at some point, it's a positive action. So it's really hard to remember breathing."

Sounds like something John Cleese would have said in a Monty Python sketch

Sounds like something John Cleese would have said in a Monty Python sketch

He’s telling us he can’t breathe, that it’s so deep that he can’t exhale and relax.

We had a dinner party to celebrate his release and our avoidance of being accountable to regular society= we think we are above the law and are assholes.

Lol so true its a good indication of his insincerity 4 sure

Lol so true its a good indication of his insincerity 4 sure

Thanks for the laugh, I needed it after this

Thanks for the laugh, I needed it after this

The response of a liar without doubt.  I know, I used to interview them very often.

@Florida Island Girl Doesn't surprise me... 🤢🤢🤢

@Florida Island Girl Doesn't surprise me... 🤢🤢🤢

"And do you lie, sir?"  (sound of crickets chirping....)

"And do you lie, sir?"  (sound of crickets chirping....)

youngjdef goodness no I don’t breath , I have this done with PFC . ( liquid) In fact I don’t even digest food I have PCN in my arteries. I am Prince Andrew. and I love children. Sorry your comment is so funny just adding more

Youngjdef I could have not said it better ! Good sense of humour  !

Youngjdef I could have not said it better ! Good sense of humour  !

Wolf Boy well his honorable nature didn't allow him to block a convicted child sex trafficker....had to go to spend a few days letting him down gently

Andrew: I am unable to breathe due to an overdose of adrenaline due to being shot at while in Pizza Express, I remember it weirdly distinctly.

J. Epstein homes were decorated with pictures of nude women.  The bedrooms were set up as sex chambers!  There were orgy rooms!  You had to be blind not to realize.  Even investigators sought counseling after being in the homes.  It was very disturbing according to many of the investigators!

Hahahaha, blinding, in what I have heard upto now  he's guilty,

Hahahaha, blinding, in what I have heard upto now  he's guilty,

My charity work with young children precludes me from breathing.

My charity work with young children precludes me from breathing.

😂😂😂😂😂 I'm still laughing. I read this five minutes ago

😂😂😂😂😂 I'm still laughing. I read this five minutes ago

Prince Andrew was an absolute fool to sit down and interview with the media. Not only was his entire dialogue disingenuous, but the hypocracy is mindbogglingly. Being a Royal therefore an elite believe they live in a parallel universe, therefore they are entitled to do what they want. On the other hand we are perceived as " deplorables" and we are would be facing an eternity behind bars. Mr Epstein trafficked in under age girls.

Ahhhh you see there's the problem. I couldn't possibly breathe as a result of what I would describe as a a a a a excess of adrenalin I suffered in a recent interview and and and and having to lie my tits off for the best part of an hour. Time for a large scotch! No I never said, I don't drink or at least have never bought a drink that nope absolutely impossible my tendency to being too honourable wouldn't allow it. Breathing is a positive action and I do not remember anything.... No definitely not.

Best comment I have ever read on any channel! 😂😂🤣🤣😂😂

Best comment I have ever read on any channel! 😂😂🤣🤣😂😂

Andrew: I breathed, I’ve kicked myself often for behaving without decorum. I’ve really let the side down.

Interviewer: Do you breathe everyday?<br>Bill Clinton: That depends on what your definition of "breathe" is. It's like that time I greeted Matt Damon by putting my left hand on his shoulder and my right hand roughly in the vicinity of his belt buckle and someone said that I'd grabbed his stimulus package. That was awkward. So, you're gonna hafta be more specific.

Interviewer: Do you breathe everyday?
Bill Clinton: That depends on what your definition of "breathe" is. It's like that time I greeted Matt Damon by putting my left hand on his shoulder and my right hand roughly in the vicinity of his belt buckle and someone said that I'd grabbed his stimulus package. That was awkward. So, you're gonna hafta be more specific.

Well it was a convenient place to breathe

Well it was a convenient place to breathe

Interviewer - "Do you breathe everyday?" Prince Andrew - (Sharp intake of breath) "Oh good lord, no."

"Indeed, I distinctly remember that last time when I breathed, I was with the kids." Oops, that came out wrong...

"A number of people counselled me one way or the other - whether to breathe or not - and in fact I made the judgment call, for better or worse, that I would simply stop breathing, as I recall. But I don't think I remember there ever being a time when I breathed. Perhaps I inhaled, but certainly, I never exhaled. You understand what I mean."

"No...I would say...if anything...I'm too honourable to breathe."

"No...I would say...if anything...I'm too honourable to breathe."


It's crazy how clearly his facial expressions and mannerisms demonstrate his guilt. He didn't even have to speak. Its just written on his face and demeanour.


I feel like he was convinced he was soooooo clever and could deceive us, the "common people", easily. Which makes it even funnier and more pathethic.


The use of the words positive action was so well done, it was as if they were doing cognitive behavioural therapy and switching the connotation of the action in our heads to associate his actions with positive ones. Whoever coached him did a fantastic job on this.

Precisely the point =] Excellent observation.

How did it make you feel after hearing it?

Really? I understand your point, but I think that part kind of stuck out like a sore thumb. It was like he literally repeated something from a textbook and it didnt flow like a normal human answer in a conversation to me. Hope that makes sense


The interviewer was brilliant, right down to her choice of clothing.<br>I can't imagine what happened behind closed doors, that that interview was even granted and occurred.

The interviewer was brilliant, right down to her choice of clothing.
I can't imagine what happened behind closed doors, that that interview was even granted and occurred.


Not once did he ever say how disgusted he was with Epstein. Not once did he express sympathy for the victims.

When you listen to the royal correspondents comment on this during their interviews, the only thing really talked about is the shame on the royal family, nothing of remorse for any victim whether related directly to this scumbag or not... zero empathy

Because he was a willing participant himself

Well he did very firmly describe Epstein's actions as "unbecoming" so boom! He really laid the hammer down.

I just tried to give you a gold award...then remembered this isn't Reddit 🏆

@English cloud: That is correct. He's basically trying to minimize the significance and impact on his relation with Epstein and otherwise than that saying nothing on the subject. "Me stupido, me know nothing" (quote from the name of the rose).<br>Even it it weren't asked by the interviewer it would have been wise that he gave a strong statement (hopefully honest) on his views on that.

@English cloud: That is correct. He's basically trying to minimize the significance and impact on his relation with Epstein and otherwise than that saying nothing on the subject. "Me stupido, me know nothing" (quote from the name of the rose).
Even it it weren't asked by the interviewer it would have been wise that he gave a strong statement (hopefully honest) on his views on that.

Amber Maynard only 3 girls have ever made a mention of that, and even then it’s something they heard from HIM. If Andrew had been blackmailed, even once, i’m sure this interview would be a lot more hostile towards him.

Exactly royal or not you would be truly outraged that he did this and also conned you to believe otherwise... but nope the reaction says guilty x

Epstein had hidden cameras everywhere, on all his properties.  Epstein used the videos of billionaires and politicians to blackmail them.  I'm sure he had a video of Prince Andrew.  The FBI has Epstein's videos now.  Dozens and dozens of rich and famous people having sex with minors.  Will they arrest all these people?  Maybe, maybe not.  Many if not all of the videos might disappear.  I'd love to see them all arrested and charged.

@stonytina01 will-not-be-banned 😂 what are you even talking about

Or express outrage at the abuse itself. He had to be pressed and still mumbled and bumbled. The only regret was he was stupid in not cutting ties like the other powerful men did.

@zeranzeran he does care. stop, just stop zeran!!

Because he isn't disgusted by him and doesn't view the victims as human beings 😪

@johanna richmond They were children. People don't need to be in chains to be trapped. Add on to that they are children, it's a whole other level of messed up. Your comment just baffles me.

Why should he, where were the vicims?  I havent heard about any chains, anyone could come and go and stay away.

He's too "honorable" to lie to us. We know he doesn't care about the victims. Epstein was probably a hero to him.

@Riccio Cruz I never said it 'proved anything' all I did was point out how little sympathy or disgust he expressed. Everything was about saving his own back. I was just pointing it out. I personally believe its suspicious.

@English Cloud It's not completely different. If I knew about you personally I would've made a better comparison with someone you knew personally that did something wrong.

And the truth is Andrew hasn't been tried and proven guilty of conspiring, or he might be in jail. Nobody knows for sure Why Epstein was doing what he was doing and how he got his money, etc.

Yes, Epstein didn't kill himself and yes very famous and powerful people were involved. Also yes, Andrew may absolutely be involved and to which degree may never be known.

My statement still stands. Not saying something does not prove guilt or innocence.

@Riccio Cruz thats completely different. I am not being accused of participating in the crimes Goebels committed. I was never his friend. If he truly were innocent, he would have expressed a lot more disgust at the thought of being friends with a pedophile. He woukd have shown a lot more sympathy for the victims. Andrew is being accused of conspiring wish Epstein, he isnt doing a very good job at convincing anyone of his innocence.

I'm not defending anyone. I just want to point out how stupid your statement is.

@english Cloud, You've never once openly and adamantly spoken out against the practices and involvement of Joseph Goebbels. You MUST support the National Socialist German Workers Party.

Just because you don't say anything doesn't prove guilt.

Because he was to focused on trying to look innocent

Nor did any of the other men [woman] in the above video while discussing the "Unwritten code of the U.K." express any real sympathy in general for all victims of sexual exploitation other than in public asking for money to be always housing and feeding them because they are 'having trouble with their memory' [And having trouble in reading body language and facial expressions]

Because in all likelihood he would be commenting negatively on a few of his other peers. It's doubtful that he was a friend ONLY with Epstein, it's more likely he's friends with many other people in their same fucked up, reprehensible group. Maybe he doesn't want to be found to have 'committed suicide' like Mr Epstein.

He only spoke about him being judged by others. The only reason he "stopped seeing him" was because of the public eye. Not because the guy deserved to die.

He is known in english press as a. Randy Andy

   مو

Yep . Infact I think he said he didn't regret his friendship with Epstein at one point. What u have pointed out confirms in my mind that Andrew did sleep with Virginia Andrews. I hope and prey all of those women get the justice they deserve.🙏🏾


Imagine being so sheltered and privileged that you’ve never had to go into an uncomfortable situation and rely on charm and integrity cus he has neither.


I have no idea why he chose to do this interview. Before this I would have wondered or sat on the fence, now there's not one shred of doubt in my mind he is guilty. None.


Describing a sex trafficker’s home, that you stayed at, as “railroad station” doesn’t help, your highness.

@jodybobble you’re right!  As it should be

He is no longer 'Your Highness'...his family have stripped him of all titles 😁


This goes to show he has never been questioned before in his life because of his authority and title - now look he can hardly answer a single question without sounding guilty. Proves all the money in the world can still make you weak

Weak in the sense he's hopelessly  transparent and not very smart.   However, his title makes him untouchable and the worst that can happen to him is a bit of embarrassment.    That's something that we as a nation should address.    Is that what we want our special family, the elite group that look down at us and regard us with contempt and disgust, to be?         Many of us are contemptible anc disgusting....however, so is Prince Andrew.


so coached. so rehearsed. so arrogant. <br>he thinks he’s untouchable and refuses to take accountability. made me sick watching him act totally innocent.

so coached. so rehearsed. so arrogant.
he thinks he’s untouchable and refuses to take accountability. made me sick watching him act totally innocent.


I can’t help but think he’s purposely doing this to mock people. These people can’t be stopped😞


I want to laugh about how bad he is at lying, but the fact he so obviously guilty yet he’s still got away with it makes me sick.


Someone who wasn’t guilty accused of such a thing wouldn’t even entertain being interviewed about it considering how scandalous and preposterous and angering it would be to the person in question


I just found this.

It's like finding a $100 bill in my jeans.

Without the hunder dollar bill.<br>Or the jeans.

Without the hunder dollar bill.
Or the jeans.

Bruh i have the same exact feeling i thought i watched everything💀

I literally just now found it. Does this video just go on and off for some reason?

Next to a winning lottery ticket of 100.000 dollars

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.<br>- Adûnâi

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.
- Adûnâi

Even better than a $100 bill because I actually know how to save this video

@dayvwayv and now its unlisted again. lol wtf. JCS must be trying his best to get it out there without making the elite weirdos angry :P

Jesus you must be rich as hell. This is like finding a 5 dollar bill at most.

Literally same. I don't know how I missed it. I've been up and down this channel lol

Id rather the one hundred. He's so creepy

Holy crap! That is exactly what I felt. Nailed it

@I am Connected Ohhhhhhhh thats why. I was like "i watched all of his videos how did i missed this*

@I am Connected The Queen sent a cease-and-desist.

Totally agree. I thought I’d watched every JCS video, yet here we are.

@Murut I completely know what you mean. 🤣

Saaaaaame! I have been searching for more of these!!!

@Natti Ramaekers just so you know they have about 30 more videos on patreon. All of them as high of quality as the YouTube ones :)

Hahahah no joke! JSC needs to post more content I have already rewatched everything lol 😂

Haha I knew I had watched all his videos

@dayvwayv Thank you. I was going all conspiracy with it. Lol.

This video wasn't available to me until recently. I've gone through this list and watched all the videos.

This is the first time I've seen it show up. Even in the list of videos.

I'm living for the youtubers breakdown of this bastard, how he's picking him apart.

Yeah wtf. I thought I watched every single video he had and somehow missed this

Same. Spot on. I'm subbed as well, like, how did I miss this gold mine of a video

@I am Connected i was wondering if that was why it suddenly popped up in my recommended lol

same feeling here, perfectly described. thought I already inhaled this channel completely :D

The video was on private for some reason. Was taken off recently


Anyone who knows anything about how to spot a liar could easily see through his absolutely piss poor façade, but yikes, he still just gets away with it because he's part of the royal family. And yet his ego and the amount of privilege/protection he has still aren't as big as his ears

Tuesday [̸̭͋c̸̨̉o̶̮͂ŕ̷̙r̵̜̓ù̶̬ṕ̸̥t̴̤͂e̶͔͒d̵̙̏]̷̱͊


He grew up being called His Royal Highness.
That medieval foolishness will make anyone delusional.
He thought he could do anything and get away with it, and he was probably right.


The fact that he denied absolutely everything is telling that he’s a liar

@Greasy Limpet and the 26 up voters... maybe the legal system needs reconsidering ..

Curtis Jennings - if he is innocent of the accusations, in your opinion he should say that he's guilty?  Either way to you want him to say "yes, I did it; please take everything away from me"?  I hope you're not on jury duty...

But if you had not done anything you would deny it as well


Every time I watch this I always imagine Andrew walking out of this interview, adjusting his tie and saying, in an upbeat manner, 'I think that went quite well'


I despise how they called the girls “young woman” it’s a child. A minor. A girl. Not a young woman, a young woman is 20 or 21 and up. Not 12 or 14.

As of 1:26, the women doing the interview has only called them ‘young girls’. The only time she has said ‘young women’ was when quoting what someone else had said.

When I was 17 I considered myself a young woman. People referred to me as a young lady, not as a young girl

When I was 17 I considered myself a young woman. People referred to me as a young lady, not as a young girl

I think it's fair to refer to a young male or female who has gone through puberty as a young man or woman. Yes, legally they are minors but if they can make babies, I'd say it's not crazy to refer to them that way.

manipulation of perception.
the media use it all the time, they are conditioning people to use such linguistic techniques as well.
to function in the modern world, one needs to have learned the meta-language of manipulation itself, it gives me conniptions ho necessary this is.

@Judge If you are talking about the age of consent, it is lower than 18 in most US states

@Judge If you are talking about the age of consent, it is lower than 18 in most US states

Geez, if anyone was trying to lie on camera and knew they were on camera and everyone was going to disect every little facial expression and word and body language...none of us would be able to do it!

You would have to be a psychopath like a dirty cop in order to get yourself to believe your own lies and come across as somewhat believable.

But I think all things considered, he didn't look that bad here. He reacted and responded as he should have. Everyone reacts differently with their expressions.

I am a terrible liar! The worst. I avoid eye contact, I start sweating, I am depressed, etc. People see me just walking by them and think I am a bad guy.
I am a dark skinned man too so that doesn't help peoples perception of me.

Holy cow when she was saying woman i thought i was a grown adult woman not a damn minor

Holy cow when she was saying woman i thought i was a grown adult woman not a damn minor

@GhostMan407 lmao around 14-20 what a range! In reality no one ever heard about it until you stated it! Lolll

@GhostMan407 lmao around 14-20 what a range! In reality no one ever heard about it until you stated it! Lolll

@Hussain RT these are literal children who should not be engaging with ANY kind of sexual act with a grown adult let alone a 50+ year old man. disgusting behaviour in these comments

If they called them a child in this scenario, the accusations would've been very direct and Prince Andrew may not have even answered something sufficient to analyse. But the media absolutely should be calling them children, because it's child rape.

@solame10101Considering the fact that I wanted to get a reaction, that could go both ways.

@solame10101Considering the fact that I wanted to get a reaction, that could go both ways.

@word Damn this is peak cringe, well done. Going to use this.

@word Damn this is peak cringe, well done. Going to use this.

@I haven't changed the profile pic in 8 years That's still downplaying the crime. Even IF those girls are now young women, the correct thing to say would be something along the lines of ".... Took advantage of someone when they were underaged...."

Hell, I'd argue ypung woman could be as low as 17 but you know they didn't even reach there, those sickos

Hell, I'd argue ypung woman could be as low as 17 but you know they didn't even reach there, those sickos

this is what made me confused like what young women i thought they were all underaged girls so weird to why they would say that

Thank you so much for pointing this out <br>Letting predators call children they molested  "young women" is messed up

Thank you so much for pointing this out
Letting predators call children they molested  "young women" is messed up

Its not a police interrogation. You want the interviewee to cough up as much bullshit as possible and so you dont antagonize him. You risk him walking out.

it makes me so angry how they sugarcoat this

it makes me so angry how they sugarcoat this

It’s their parents who are to blame, for letting them near these old men

It’s their parents who are to blame, for letting them near these old men

Unless we know their age then we should refer to them as "young looking female" because if he had said "yes there were young women there" then he could have claimed to know they were of legal age. I feel like the reporter was trying to give him an out but he didn't catch onto it

I call women of all ages girl or lady. If I'm being specific then I would say child/adult, but I don't think "girl" is strictly for underage females

Could it be that the abuse took place several years/decades ago? Aren't the victims being referred to now grown?

Could it be that the abuse took place several years/decades ago? Aren't the victims being referred to now grown?

I haven't changed the profile pic in 8 years

They use these words to take away blame and fault from the people who took part so they don’t perceive us seeing them as bad

@Becky Farley Yeah, that's not how biology works. You don't go from vulnerable, young child to fully grown, adult woman overnight. You're speaking legally. Want to speak legally? The woman who accused Prince Andrew of having sex with her - the same woman who was old enough to drive a car and enlist in the military at the time - was also above the age of consent at the time of their sexual relations in the place in which they had those relations.

So if you want to talk legalities, be consistent.
If you want to talk biology, be realistic.

Well I doubt he'd answer any question unless it was phrased as "young woman" it was a smart choice even if it isnt correct.

@A Vx that example is just a joke, that whole case was disgusting trying to downplay that piece of craps crimes
but in this video she has to be more delicate about it and use euphamisms in an attempt to get him to be more forthcoming and maybe admit to it when it seems less heinous
if she outright was calling it pedophilia, criminal acts and the like hed be admitting to crimes and obviously would never admit a thing

if shes using women and sex it sounds a lot more like a mild romp and not a horrible crime and hes a lot more likely to come clean

@GhostMan407 Ah, considering your comments, you need to be put on a watchlist. Incredibly creepy and vile. How would you feel if you were violated by a man at age 14? Or is it only acceptable when it's done to women?

It's just a tactic used by interrogators.

It's just a tactic used by interrogators.

No woman is 18 and up.  A young woman is a teenager.  Get it right.

No woman is 18 and up.  A young woman is a teenager.  Get it right.

@dillongarner1 "Woman" implies an adult female. "Young woman" implies a young adult female. A child cannot be "young woman", they can be called a minor, or underaged, a young girl, or a child, not "young woman" for god's sake.

They do it all the time with the Roman Polanski situation, which involves 12 year old girls. It’s sick and disgusting the erasure of their childhood to downplay rape and abuse.

She said that because they have grown up and are now “young women” I think

She said that because they have grown up and are now “young women” I think

@paranoid android doesnt matter what she looks like, go back to school

@paranoid android doesnt matter what she looks like, go back to school

@John F. Kennedy You were great in Clone High

@John F. Kennedy You were great in Clone High

@GhostMan407 You’ve consistently dissappoint me, not that it’s surprising. A normal peron would’ve muted me by now. Nothing personal, I just want to outline your boundaries.

@GhostMan407 The Prankster has cold feet ig. You really took the cake as one of my least favorite encounters.

@GhostMan407 The Prankster has cold feet ig. You really took the cake as one of my least favorite encounters.

@GhostMan407 I’m so glad you don’t have an s/o

@GhostMan407 I’m so glad you don’t have an s/o

@GhostMan407 Tell me more. Are you anti-vaxx as well? I wouldn’t put it past you.

@GhostMan407 Tell me more. Are you anti-vaxx as well? I wouldn’t put it past you.

@GhostMan407 You really fell for reverse-psychology. You really are predictable.

@GhostMan407 You really fell for reverse-psychology. You really are predictable.

@word no not really and try to keep me away

@word no not really and try to keep me away

@GhostMan407 Too scared to reply again? Make sure you keep away from children lol.

@GhostMan407 Too scared to reply again? Make sure you keep away from children lol.

The day a girl has her first period she transforms in to a young women. That's natural.

The day a girl has her first period she transforms in to a young women. That's natural.

@GhostMan407  No they do not.  Laws are different in each state in the U.S. of age of consent.

@GhostMan407  No they do not.  Laws are different in each state in the U.S. of age of consent.

@GhostMan407 so u would sleep with a 14 year old ?

@GhostMan407 so u would sleep with a 14 year old ?

@Lisa how do you know that? you don’t make that decision, the person gets to. they get to decide when they are ready

@Lisa how do you know that? you don’t make that decision, the person gets to. they get to decide when they are ready

@GhostMan407  That has nothing to do with <b>rape</b> or the age of consent.  Just because someone's body may be ready, emotionally they are not.

@GhostMan407  That has nothing to do with *rape* or the age of consent.  Just because someone's body may be ready, emotionally they are not.

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.<br>- Adûnâi

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.
- Adûnâi

Dunno depends certain religions towards the middle east think its acceptable to have wives around that age and the west now deem it acceptable on religious grounds which is equally as disgusting

@GhostMan407

Very few people actually know this Lol. Or if you mention it everybody raises eyebrows. A greater number of states say 16 than 18.

@Synthetic Teapot in many states tho the age of consent is below 18 and the age of an adult can be higher, so i think it depends on state laws more than anything

@GhostMan407 but in the context of rape, they are legally considered boys and girls under the law-aka minors. The language used in these contexts does absolutely matter.

well that not necessarily true, for example: boys in high school (aged 14-18) are often called young men

well that not necessarily true, for example: boys in high school (aged 14-18) are often called young men

@paranoid android creepiest comment ever

@paranoid android creepiest comment ever

The journalist uses the word "girl" or "girls" a few times later on.

The journalist uses the word "girl" or "girls" a few times later on.

@dillongarner1 Uhm NO they are children until 18, after that I guess fair game. And what 17-18 years old wants ANY man almost old enough to be a dad or grand dad pawing all over them. Would you want the person who did this to your child NOT do it to any other child.

They ARE young women..... so yeah. Accurate.

They ARE young women..... so yeah. Accurate.

@A Vx It is amazing how some of our own won't help, just turn the other way so they don't have to "see" the bad and it ruin their OWN sense of worth. I myself know too many like that. I chased down a woman in a car years ago for beating the crap out of a toddler, I don't know if I helped or not but I will do it again. I really can't abide a bully and anyone that abuses a weaker person no matter the age is just wrong. I don't even know what my mind would come up with if this happened to one of my grandchildren I don't know how I would stay out of jail. Anyway have a good day and let's pray for this world, and each other.   :)

@Becky Farley his name should always bring a bitter taste to anyone who speaks it.
The names not spoken enough are the heros who saved Channel Miller that night.
They weren’t even American. They were Swedish students. Peter Jonsson chased down Brock, who had a head start, and held him down til police arrived. Carl-Fredrik Arndt stayed with Channel and kept her safe. She kept saying “thank you”, he said “helping the world is thanks enough” fucking beautiful.

@A Vx Yep, I saw that and every time I see it on face book I share it again to remind people he is a monster and a POS.

That deceptive language is always used to downplay the crime and victims. <br>Like when Brock Turner RAPED an unconscious woman next to a dumpster and the headlines said “All American Swimmer convicted of assault”. Downplaying the crime, the victim, and his status as a fucking DANGER TO WOMEN

That deceptive language is always used to downplay the crime and victims.
Like when Brock Turner RAPED an unconscious woman next to a dumpster and the headlines said “All American Swimmer convicted of assault”. Downplaying the crime, the victim, and his status as a fucking DANGER TO WOMEN

It's the devious use of language to minimise the horror of the situation. If the perpetrator were non-royalty there'd be no hesitation in using terms like 'child,' 'girl,' etc.


This was an interview he never should’ve done.  He doesn’t hide his emotions very well through his gestures and reactions.  He’s not very good at disguising this.  He’d make a horrible criminal profiler.


I hope he ends up in prison in the US. I love how much the US keep putting their foot down and pushing for this case to go forward. I hope you win, America.


1:53 makes me laugh so hard everytime. Jim rarely uses "bad words" and it's so funny to see that even we he does it's in a very intelligent way.


The way he sits he's legs are crossed and so are his arms at times is striking.
When we feel vulnerable we unconsciously protect the vulnerable parts ourselves the lower abdomen/belly area, by crossing our arms.
And is a way saying you're closed minded, visually speaking and we are not open to the ideas being presented to us.
He's acting more like he's got something to hide rather than someone telling the truth.


The way he talks is how I used to fluff up my essays

Since the dawn of time, man has societyietyd.

Me too... but with an American accent 🙃 (probably makes it worse)

@Mitch so because I happen to already be on YouTube and replied it means I care?

I guess with that logic you care about my response. Damn I feel so loved ❤❤

P. S. I'm glad you care SO much that you decided to check out my content!

@Mitch that's nice. Am I supposed to care?

You use "that that that that that that that that that..." in essays? I'm impressed

Or like me as a child when I would come home stoned and talk to my parents.

I'm just really surprised he agreed to do this..
It's like talking to the cops haha, innocent or guilty it will only hurt you
And here, he's going to be fighting an uphill battle already to not appear full of it, & clearly he's waay too nervous and fumbling to confidently push away the rumors
Could have just released a statement saying a bunch of famous people knew him, I want involved, end of

When you try to reach that word count 😂😂

@Lola You must go to a very different kind of school than I did! Where are you from? In S London where I went to school, nobody talks like this! And in Somerset, Sussex and other places I've spent time this kind of speech is pretty rare there too.

Just extreme metaphors and denial with added ands yesses and ifs

@big balled bastard I hope this comment gets the appreciation it deserves. A mere two 'likes' is a disappointment. For shame Youtube-types. For shame...

the only esse you'll be fluffing up is in prison. his name is jose

YES. as i was watching this, it reminded me of one time in my honors english class where i forgot to write a speech and had to come up with something on the spot, naturally doing terribly


now that he was stripped of his title, we know he's guilty.  The world wants to see you in jail Andrew.


This interview is quite painful to watch. My whole face hurts from face-palming so much.


For all the outrage we feel: remember to check your local 'age of consent laws.  The laws need to change to 18 and above. Furthermore, one could argue a case to make the legal age of adulthood 21.  Cant buy beer at 18 but we can still draft for military service or execute you legally.  Dumb laws. Please change.


His entitlement and pomposity is beyond belief. I can imagine when the idea was put to him for this interview that he took no advice and truly thought that no one could tell him what to do.


He wanted to clear his name, ended up convincing everyone that he’s guilty

@Ernestine Maloy it's 18 in 39 countries, but 16 in 76 countries. I keep trying to link a source, but youtube keeps deleting those comments.

@Ernestine Maloy wow for life? I hear life for drug charges too. man, this is how they will end up letting everyone out one day. All these unnecessary lifers are drowning out the real ones. So one day when it all gets too expensive and they are forced to open those doors and gates it will be chaos. But thats all part of the plan. haha evil pricks

@Ernestine Maloy 16 is most recognized around the world. and 15 if you are 15 yourself in my country. 16 is a good age i think. Any older and you start getting people in all sorts of trouble. For what!

@Wendy Woo I'm starting to find that the age of consent is quite younger than 18 eventhough its said to be 18 at least in the u.s

@FemBot or wealthy enough to believe they are ubove the law and therefore invincible

@Wendy Woo actually 18 is the recognized age of consent in most countries

Age of consent is 16 so what do you want the government to do exactly?

Pierre Begley id say that’s more fucked up cause the English government recognises that he is guilty but are too much of cowards to actually punish him cause he’s royal

Come now, his birthday was canceled! Surely that's bad enough ☹

He has hidden away from the public and has been stripped of his royal "duties". So I suppose it's a start. <br>But yeah, it would be a lot better to see him punished for his crimes.

He has hidden away from the public and has been stripped of his royal "duties". So I suppose it's a start.
But yeah, it would be a lot better to see him punished for his crimes.

doesn't matter tho. He will get away with it

Too sheltered to know he would face reality


He said it himself!! There were staff, he wasn't staff, he was a friend, an invited friend, so if you're not working there and you were a friend one would have had to know what was going on.... I've known people like this, they think their money and status will save them and if not they've got a team of lawyers who will take care of it for them. He should be so ashamed of himself!!


Imagine being married to or be born from the union with this guy. Imagine the second degree guilt in your conscience <br>Thank God many of us had the privilege of not experiencing that

Imagine being married to or be born from the union with this guy. Imagine the second degree guilt in your conscience
Thank God many of us had the privilege of not experiencing that


"Do I belive he acted in a manner quite unbecoming? Yes."<br>"He was a sex offender..."

"Do I belive he acted in a manner quite unbecoming? Yes."
"He was a sex offender..."


When i first watched thw video i was like, damn it really reminds me of myself when i lie about stuff, there's no way i would become a successful criminal or a successful actress because of that, i have so much guilt of my actions that in the end  i just confess the truth ( not that they wouldn't figure i would be lying) an example of how i look like when i lie, u can see here 0:39


I feel uncomfortable with them calling it 'having sex'. Because the truth of the matter is that it's rape.

@Andrew Reaney i doubt those girls were one day from turning 18. Probably a few years from it.<br>And even if they were almost 18, They are still not legal by law. U can ofcourse choose to not abide by the law. But there is consequences.

@Andrew Reaney i doubt those girls were one day from turning 18. Probably a few years from it.
And even if they were almost 18, They are still not legal by law. U can ofcourse choose to not abide by the law. But there is consequences.

@Angamaitë Sangahyando gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8

ME MUMMY IS THE QUEEN ULL REGRET THAT COMMENT<br>LMFAO

ME MUMMY IS THE QUEEN ULL REGRET THAT COMMENT
LMFAO

@Andrew Reaney why are you even trying to argue this😐. Sounds like you trying to justify what he did since theyre “young adults” even though theyre still minors

@RazzBerry  Hey, I watched the same video

@RazzBerry  Hey, I watched the same video

@one peace So a female who has been alive for 17 years and 364 days is a child but the very next day she's a woman? Utter tripe.

@RazzBerry lol. this is an interview, not a police interrogation.

@Speccy SquareGoLike Ok, I’ll be more mindful about its use. Thanks for letting me know

@Angamaitë Sangahyando You're trolling and you need to try harder. You're not doing it right.

@Speccy SquareGoLike How do you ever find a new and astonishing idea if you call them all "trolling"? I freely admit that my views are different. Different cultures exist, and different minds.<br>- Adûnâi

@Speccy SquareGoLike How do you ever find a new and astonishing idea if you call them all "trolling"? I freely admit that my views are different. Different cultures exist, and different minds.
- Adûnâi

@Brook You phrased it better than I did. Thank you.

@YamaYam Technically, but don't say that, please. As someone who was raped multiple times by an ex, it is quite hurtful and feels like you're downplaying the severity of rape. Think of it as sex being consensual and rape being non-consensual.

Rape is always sex. Sex is not always rape.

I don't see how that's even controversial unless you can't speak English.

You couldn't be more correct, disturbingly.

she knows that, same with calling children women, i believe shes using euphemisms so it doesnt seem as accusatory & scandalous otherwise hed just feign being offended and probably storm out<br>its easier to get him to stay and dig himself deeper if shes making it seem less horrendous and disgusting

she knows that, same with calling children women, i believe shes using euphemisms so it doesnt seem as accusatory & scandalous otherwise hed just feign being offended and probably storm out
its easier to get him to stay and dig himself deeper if shes making it seem less horrendous and disgusting

@YamaYam If someone got murdered and I wanted to see if I could get the offender to open up, yes I would avoid using the word "murder." I would say "do you know anything of their death?"

In fact, I would say the fact that she didn't use the word "rape" is possibly partly how she tripped him up: conflicting his mind between admitting to something that doesn't sound as bad versus denying it altogether. You can tell with his responses that he rambles, indecisive of how to approach it.

There's a time for calling it as it is, no holds barred in all its horror. And there's a time for mindgames. This was a time for mindgames.

@Julu That has never been included in any popular definition of sex, and is opposed to the scientific definition of sex. You could call this a pointless argument, but I find it even more pointless to reclassify what the word sex means.

@YamaYam Sex includes consent from all parties. Rape is not sex. Simple 👍

@RazzBerry glad people are picking up on what JCS is teaching!

if they said "rape", the interview likely would have ended there. The royals wouldn't put up with such indignation, even if it's true, which it is.

@Becky Farley if they said "children", the interview likely would have ended there. The royals wouldn't put up with such indignation, even if it's true, which it is.

@YamaYam But hurt is a is a descriptor of  murder.

@Becky Farley right? "Woman" implies an adult female. "Young woman" implies a young adult female. A child cannot be "young woman", they can be called a minor, or underaged, a young girl, or a child, not "young woman" for god's sake.

@VL VEIL "what ifs" are not an argument<br>Also an interrogator is more likely to refer to a murder as an accident so as to not come off as accusatory toward a suspect

@VL VEIL "what ifs" are not an argument
Also an interrogator is more likely to refer to a murder as an accident so as to not come off as accusatory toward a suspect

i understand why, but if you came out of the gate accusing the offender of rape they'll never admit to anything. if you downplay the severity of the crime and you can get them to admit to ''having sex'', then that's a foot in the door to proving a rape occurred. its a very common tactic in police interrogations

@VL VEIL Yep, i would, and i doubt that people casually give specific details about the murder when they are saying that their family got murdered.<br>Idk what ur trying to prove here, but u're embarassing urself bro.

@VL VEIL Yep, i would, and i doubt that people casually give specific details about the murder when they are saying that their family got murdered.
Idk what ur trying to prove here, but u're embarassing urself bro.

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.<br>- Adûnâi

Personally, I'm a Coммunist, but this interview instilled in me a newfound respect for this cнad of a man. Prince Andrew is a true Nietzschean telling this miserable Christian doз of an interviewer off like a total gentleman. I salute you, Prince.
- Adûnâi

@Ist das deine Karte? Yes? They were hurt?<br>"So when your family get's brutally axe-murdered by a psychopath in a banana suit you would just call it "my family was murdered?"

@Ist das deine Karte? Yes? They were hurt?
"So when your family get's brutally axe-murdered by a psychopath in a banana suit you would just call it "my family was murdered?"

@Ist das deine Karte? If someone got murdered, I’d call it murder. I may specifically describe the murder as them being “beaten to death”. If someone got raped, I may describe what happened as forced or non consensual sex. I’d either call it rape or non-consensual sex depending on the context. If both parties took drugs and couldn’t consent, I would refer to the action as non consensual sex, not rape.

@YamaYam So when your family gets murdered u would just call it "my family was hurt"?

i know but it’s to downplay the crime in the perpetrators mind to try and get a foot in the door, trying to get them to admit to a “lesser crime” so that a better case can be built.

Agreed and I have a problem when they call the children "young women".


I watched this last year and felt that he's largely telling the truth, but I'm willing to watch this through....that said I'm 1 minute in and he shakes his own head after asked if he's sure...


I know I'm late, but I find really interesting how he's so stressed you can actually see his heart pumping at 100%
if you look closely at his foot it's moving slightly to a heartbeat rythm, for example at min 1:40


See the way he's shaking his head in the end when asked if he has any guilt or shame, and then says yes. He really thinks no, because he was shaking his head. He has no remorse.


this is brilliant wish we could watch him all the time


It’s so ironic. If he stepped away and refused to do the interview, not as many people would’ve been 100% convinced of his guilt! The fact he thought he cleared his name after this is hilarious.

He increased the surface area of ridicule by doing this. Bad move on his part.

My guy has brought it all down upon himself in both ways

The privileged fully expect their words to be the final say on the issue.

@Richella River you could say that about anything - claims need evidence

I struggle to see the point of doing an interview even if you're innocent? Maybe it's just me but I can't see the positives it'll bring you, innocent or otherwise

he may have been voluntold for this interview by those in charge

@darnell pistachio that discussion is, believe it or not, SECONDARY to analyzing how our economic system works and in what ways it’s influenced our current scenario. For example, you mention “elites” in your other comments and I’ve always been interested in how you describe those people and HOW they got into the positions they found themselves in. COULD it have played out any other way? Is there a version of history where they never got into power? If your argument is correct and capitalism is inferior to state production..well great. Then humanity is fucked. Because it’s best option is apocalyptically bad. I am more interested in descriptive arguments than prescriptive ones right now. I’m not arguing what we “should do” with a person that doesn’t agree with me about what “is”. If you think capitalism checkmates other economic systems, that’s terrific. But if we both understand how capitalism works in the same way (we probably don’t) then I don’t know how the hell you could EVER complain about elites. You know why? Because the force at the core of capital is empty self-replication. Capital is that which makes more of itself. SO OF COURSE CAPITAL IS GOING TO ACCUMULATE. OF COURSE ACCUMULATED CAPITAL WILL BE USED FOR REWRITING RULES/REGULATIONS. OF COURSE ACCUMULATED CAPITAL WILL BE USED TO BUY PROPAGANDA TO ROB PEOPLE OF POLITICAL AUTONOMY. What the hell else did you think was gonna happen? HOW could something else happen? What version of reality do you live in where this doesn’t always end the same way?

@darnell pistachio Thanks for the insight :)

@barnabyssjones so you think capitalism is worse than state controlled goods production?

No evidence he did anything illegal though.

Bald Manc Twat With A Head Like A Fucking Orange

@Nemi W Then what? If it happened in Croatia then what?

@Cosmic Conciousness thanks for the responses mate!

@barnabyssjones I wish I did too. And honestly to answer part of the rest of your query... I believe this focus on money will be our downfall, and you can't beat the top 1% in a money game so there's no point in trying. Skills are what we need. But a vast majority of us are working jobs that have no REAL world application. Sure they do something in the "real world" that we've built up around us but if our paper money became useless tomorrow a majority of people would be screwed. But if you know trades at even a rudementary level the community would come to rely on you.

@Cosmic Conciousness I wish I disagreed with you…

@Ethanol Sampsonite yeah I won’t pretend that I believe people will organize in a capacity that truly benefits them collectively. I want to believe it’s not over, but I think the time for it has passed. AI capable of assisting the corporate-government complex of logistically outstripping a people’s movement is like 15-20 years away and whenever you hear a person talk about socialism you get a “well I don’t expect to see it in my lifetime but…” If you’re not going to see SIGNIFICANT progress in your lifetime it’s over. I’m starting to almost become Nick Landian in my predictions for where the world is going. It’s been bad for me mentally but Incant see a future where the super rich don’t win and everyone else is robbed of their fundamental humanity and/or left to die very soon

@barnabyssjones We won't. People won't give up something that sweet once they've gotten a taste of it.

@The Final Illusion "cut off the Firestarters, try to help them and you'll burn along side them"

@darnell pistachio Interesting take? How so 🤔? I clearly cited examples for my thoughts

@Richella River no not "exactly." you 2 just said almost completely opposite things.

@Richella River you have power. You refuse it for convenience. Period.

@Richella River we have guns. But we don’t know how to shoot them it seems like.

@Richella River That's what we have our guns for, but they also have the police in their back pocket, and any revolutionary army would be labeled as a terrorist organization by the media, who (you guessed it) is also in their back pocket.

“Did you do it?”
“No”
“Okay thanks we finally solved the case”

@Derick Masai exactly. hopefully within the next century the proletariat will unionize and get to abolishing this tyrannical system and hold these monsters accountable.

@Nemi W ...yet. I know this frustrates you. It frustrates me as well. But never for a moment underestimate the little guy. There is only so much they can take. And their strength when banded together is unmatched. Look at the Dutch prime minister of 1672 for reference. Or the Capitol siege earlier this year (I'm not American but this is a clear example of how quickly mob mentality can rise and cause chaos).

And what are the people doing? Nothing to my knowledge. If this happend in Croatia ...

He had a publicist advise against this interview and quit just before it began.  Run away from the trash fire!


He looks like a kid who had been caught red handed by his mom for stealing candy from the cupboard.<br>Then acts like a huge baby saying: "Honestly mom, it wasn't me!" (with chocolate smeared all over his face)

He looks like a kid who had been caught red handed by his mom for stealing candy from the cupboard.
Then acts like a huge baby saying: "Honestly mom, it wasn't me!" (with chocolate smeared all over his face)


I’m surprised he hasn’t been pressured into talking a lie detector test. He’s clearly full of shit and he needs to be held accountable. Shame on you Andrew.


Whether he is guilty or not, there has been too much salacious press reporting and YouTube-ing (like this site) for him to get a fair trial.  This is a travesty, as I suspect he is guilty, but the man is entitled to unbiased due process.


Andrew- 'don't worry, I'll take care of this one'.<br>Advisor- 'oh fuck'

Andrew- 'don't worry, I'll take care of this one'.
Advisor- 'oh fuck'


This guy has so much ego that he actually believes people will believe him because of who he is.

@John Bryant <br>No way you could fool a body language expert. Wish I could see that put to the test. Would be a very fun experiment. Maybe you should contact the behavior panel and see if they'll put you to the test!

@John Bryant
No way you could fool a body language expert. Wish I could see that put to the test. Would be a very fun experiment. Maybe you should contact the behavior panel and see if they'll put you to the test!

@JAMES I In that case I know of a giant plot of land that's for sale. It's got a huge statue of Lincoln, and he's facing a rectangular pond. Across the pond is a giant stone monolith. It's in DC so millions of people come to see it every year.  I can put you in touch with the realtor,  it's going for a super low price of 500k, you could sell tickets to the tourists and make that up in like 3 months. Let me know if interested.

Even my dog has the sense to hide after she realizes I found the puddle she left on the floor. Ya boy just made himself look more guilty by opening his mouth.

No, he knows it doesn't matter whether or not people believe him. As long as he doesn't admit anything or rat any of the others out, he'll be protected and he knows it.

@101jir Yeah he literally looks like a 6 year old trying to lie, but most 6 year olds can do better.

@Pumitri II If I was Prince Andrew?  I wouldn't do an interview lol.  No good can come from it.  Because people who already think you're guilty aren't going to change their minds.

I mean what would you do in that situation?

People do....doesn't mean they're right it's just the state of our hive minded society.

@BringUrOwnVibe He isn't actually royalty.

That's the issue with the cesspool that is the royal family

He is a nobody, the House of Stuart is the true ruler of England.

@omgfackdehell ✅ Sad, but true. Idk how the law works in the UK, but in the US this wouldn't be nearly enough evidence, as obvious as this seems to us there isn't a lot to go off of objectively, just extremely suspicious behavior for the most part.

Some people will have believed him because of who he is, sadly.

At points. 3:25 was the classic little kid "I'm going to get in trouble if I admit this, quick, shake my head continuously so they know I absolutely positively did not do this" look. That wasn't even mature ego as much as just straight up fear of getting in trouble.

i mean that does tend to be how things work


The bit that cracked me up totally, was when he said he dealt with a situation in the way he did because he was too honourable! Priceless! He doesn’t know the meaning of the word.


"Unbecoming? He was a sex offender."<br>Great way to end the video 😂

"Unbecoming? He was a sex offender."
Great way to end the video 😂


The fact that he thought the interview went well just shows the delusion he is under.


I love this channel.  Excellent commentary and intelligent insight.


“Unbecoming? He was a sex offender.”<br>I snorted

“Unbecoming? He was a sex offender.”
I snorted

To be fair, being  sex offender is technically "unbecoming". There just more accurate words I would have used. It's like saying deficateing on the holiday dinner is "bad manners"

I love seeing her look of disdain break through at last. She was so professional the entire time, despite knowing full well how disgusting he truly is, and just how drastically he undercut Epstein’s crimes shows an effort to absolve himself of the same ones.

i was a boy. they were 138 girls. can i make it any more obvious? thats right, i had a crazy dream last night. HAHAHAHAHA!!! im the funniest youtube star ever. youre welcome for laughing dear dre


I think this is the case of “guilty until proven innocent” 😂😂


I love how you're one of my most watched YouTubers. Love your content, almost to a fault, yet i had to dig for this video YouTube not recommending it is sus af.


"to give the viewer a shred of doubt that he's not completely full of shit" sent me


It’s like watching a little kid lie to their parents