kind: youtube#commentThread

kind: youtube#comment

textDisplay: Producent – Bob Harris (6)Ovo je vrsta albuma koji mi daje pravi problem uvažavanja, Sam po sebi, ovaj bend ima sve što me može zadovoljiti u instrumentima i mogućnostima, ali bez jednog glavnog sastojka: personnaliteta . Ovo je klon bend i gledajući datum snimanja vjerojatno majka svih klonova zajedno s Fruupom, a gledajući kasnije godine u progu može se samo bojati G M O u poljoprivredi samo gledajući štetu koju su napravili klonovi u prog . Samo se šalim, ali reallt to dokazuje da su i tada nenadahnuli glazbenici (iako dobri u mnogim aspektima) napravili plagijat. Ako je Fruup bio više klon Genesisa , ovaj skandalozno pljačka Da , a ne donosi ni ništa novo u glazbu. Da su uzeli glazbu Da kao bazu da rade nešto drugo i donesu je dalje i prošire je , mogao sam im oprostiti (Starcastle je još jedan od ovih primjera) i možda čak biti impresioniran njihovom drskošću, ali ovdje , žao mi je , ništa slično. Ovaj album je pun Da slika i planova, a drugi broj počinje kao rip-off Kišne pjesme iz Zepa. Ali barem sam po sebi ovaj album ne vrijeđa taj bend , kao neke od tih 90-ih grupa. Ovo je više nespretan i pogrešno inspiriran album koji je mogao biti dobar tribute album, ali svakako ne kao vlastiti opus. Ne želim biti zao , ali većina prog fanova trebala bi imati bolje kockice / prosudbu na tim albumima i odbaciti ih jer uspjeh takvih albuma može samo potaknuti plagijat i lijenost kreativnosti, kao i napraviti prog samo još jedan industrijski proizvod koji će se kopirati i "bootlegged" (ako mi dopustite zlouporabu tog posljednjeg izraza).This is the kind of album that gives me a real problem of appreciation, In itself, this band has everything that can satisfy me in instruments and possibilities, but without one main ingredient: personnality . This is a clone band and looking at the recording date probably the mother of all clones along with Fruup, and looking later in the year in the prog can only fear G M O in agriculture just by looking at the damage done by clones in the prog . I'm just kidding, but reallt proves that even then, uninspired musicians (albeit good in many respects) made plagiarism. If Fruup was more of a Genesis clone - this scandalous heist Yes - and it doesn't bring anything new to the music. If they had taken yes music as a base to do something else and bring it on and expand it , I could have forgiven them (Starcastle is another of these examples) and might even be impressed by their audacity, but here - I'm sorry - nothing like that. This album is full of Yes pictures and plans, and the second number starts as a rip-off rain songs from Zep. But at least in itself this album doesn't offend that band - like some of those '90s groups. This is a more clumsy and misplaced album that could have been a good tribute album, but certainly not as its own oeuvre. I don't mean to be evil , but most prog fans should have better dice / judgment on these albums and reject them because the success of such albums can only encourage plagiarism and laziness of creativity, as well as make prog just another industrial product that will be copied and "bootlegged" (if you allow me to abuse that last phrase). LADISLAV&ZIVANOVIC

authorDisplayName: ladislav zivanovic


textDisplay: Producer – Bob Harris (6)This is the kind of album that gives me a real problem of appreciation, In itself, this band has everything that can satisfy me in instruments and possibilities, but without one main ingredient: personnality . This is a clone band and looking at the recording date probably the mother of all clones along with Fruup, and looking later in the year in the prog can only fear G M O in agriculture just by looking at the damage done by clones in the prog . I'm just kidding, but reallt proves that even then, uninspired musicians (albeit good in many respects) made plagiarism. If Fruup was more of a Genesis clone - this scandalous heist Yes - and it doesn't bring anything new to the music. If they had taken yes music as a base to do something else and bring it on and expand it , I could have forgiven them (Starcastle is another of these examples) and might even be impressed by their audacity, but here - I'm sorry - nothing like that. This album is full of Yes pictures and plans, and the second number starts as a rip-off rain songs from Zep. But at least in itself this album doesn't offend that band - like some of those '90s groups. This is a more clumsy and misplaced album that could have been a good tribute album, but certainly not as its own oeuvre. I don't mean to be evil , but most prog fans should have better dice / judgment on these albums and reject them because the success of such albums can only encourage plagiarism and laziness of creativity, as well as make prog just another industrial product that will be copied and "bootlegged" (if you allow me to abuse that last phrase). This is the kind of album that gives me a real problem of appreciation, In itself, this band has everything that can satisfy me in instruments and possibilities, but without one main ingredient: personnality . This is a clone band and looking at the recording date probably the mother of all clones along with Fruup, and looking later in the year in the prog can only fear G M O in agriculture just by looking at the damage done by clones in the prog . I'm just kidding, but reallt proves that even then, uninspired musicians (albeit good in many respects) made plagiarism. If Fruup was more of a Genesis clone - this scandalous heist Yes - and it doesn't bring anything new to the music. If they had taken yes music as a base to something else and bring it on and expand it , I could have forgiven them (Starcastle is another of these examples) and might even be impressed by their audacity, but here - I'm sorry - nothing like that. This album is full of Yes pictures and plans, and the second number starts as a rip-off rain songs from Zep. But at least in itself this album doesn't offend that band - like some of those '90s groups. This is a more clumsy and misplaced album that could have been a good tribute album, but certainly not as own its oeuvre. I don't mean to be evil , but most prog fans should have better dice / judgment on these albums and reject them because the success of such albums can only encourage plagiarism and laziness of creativity, as well as make prog just another industrial product that will be copied and "bootlegged" (if you allow me to abuse that last phrase). LADISLAV&ZIVANOVIC


textDisplay: Producteur – Bob Harris (6)C’est le genre d’album qui me donne un vrai problème d’appréciation, En soi, ce groupe a tout ce qui peut me satisfaire dans les instruments et les possibilités, mais sans un ingrédient principal: la personnalité . Il s’agit d’un groupe de clones et en regardant la date d’enregistrement probablement la mère de tous les clones avec Fruup, et en regardant plus tard dans l’année dans le prog ne peut que craindre G M O dans l’agriculture juste en regardant les dommages causés par les clones dans le prog . Je plaisante, mais reallt prouve que même alors, les musiciens sans inspiration (bien que bons à bien des égards) ont fait du plagiat. Si Fruup était plus un clone de La Genèse - ce scandaleux hold-up Oui - et il n’apporte rien de nouveau à la musique. S’ils avaient pris oui de la musique comme base pour faire autre chose et l’amener et l’étendre, j’aurais pu leur pardonner (Starcastle est un autre de ces exemples) et pourrait même être impressionné par leur audace, mais ici - je suis désolé - rien de tel. Cet album est plein de photos et de plans de Yes, et le deuxième numéro commence comme une chanson de pluie rip-off de Zep. Mais au moins en soi, cet album n’offense pas ce groupe - comme certains de ces groupes des années 90. C’est un album plus maladroit et mal placé qui aurait pu être un bon album hommage, mais certainement pas comme sa propre œuvre. Je ne veux pas être mauvais , mais la plupart des fans de prog devraient avoir de meilleurs dés / jugement sur ces albums et les rejeter parce que le succès de ces albums ne peut qu’encourager le plagiat et la paresse de la créativité, ainsi que faire prog juste un autre produit industriel qui sera copié et « bootlegged » (si vous me permettez d’abuser de cette dernière phrase). C’est le genre d’album qui me donne un vrai problème d’appréciation, En soi, ce groupe a tout ce qui peut me satisfaire dans les instruments et les possibilités, mais sans un ingrédient principal: la personnalité . Il s’agit d’un groupe de clones et en regardant la date d’enregistrement probablement la mère de tous les clones avec Fruup, et en regardant plus tard dans l’année dans le prog ne peut que craindre G M O dans l’agriculture juste en regardant les dommages causés par les clones dans le prog . Je plaisante, mais reallt prouve que même alors, les musiciens sans inspiration (bien que bons à bien des égards) ont fait du plagiat. Si Fruup était plus un clone de La Genèse - ce scandaleux hold-up Oui - et il n’apporte rien de nouveau à la musique. S’ils avaient pris oui la musique comme base à quelque chose d’autre et l’amener et l’élargir , j’aurais pu leur pardonner (Starcastle est un autre de ces exemples) et pourrait même être impressionné par leur audace, mais ici - je suis désolé - rien de tel. Cet album est plein de photos et de plans de Yes, et le deuxième numéro commence comme une chanson de pluie rip-off de Zep. Mais au moins en soi, cet album n’offense pas ce groupe - comme certains de ces groupes des années 90. C’est un album plus maladroit et mal placé qui aurait pu être un bon album hommage, mais certainement pas aussi propre son œuvre. Je ne veux pas être mauvais , mais la plupart des fans de prog devraient avoir de meilleurs dés / jugement sur ces albums et les rejeter parce que le succès de ces albums ne peut qu’encourager le plagiat et la paresse de la créativité, ainsi que faire prog juste un autre produit industriel qui sera copié et « bootlegged » (si vous me permettez d’abuser de cette dernière phrase). LADISLAV&ZIVANOVIC