I cannot believe she got off after all that. How??? People go to jail for the most miniscule stuff and she gets to walk free??

@Wes no, I hate to tell you, it is a combination of her lawyer her race and her gender. Had she been a black woman living in poverty and this happened she would be in jail, it's people who refuse to believe in systematic racism that are the issue, had she been a man she would have been in jail, sexism is real, and had she been a black man she would have gotten the death sentence just because you don't want to accept it doesn't mean it's not the issue

welcome to america, where you can buy your freedom

welcome to america, where you can buy your freedom

gender and race shouldnt matter not one bit with the law everyone deserves equal sentences for the same crimes no matter what. the problem is statistically women get lesser or easier sentences compared to men who have done the same crime. which shouldnt happen in the first place yet it is which is disgusting tbh

Because she’s white. If this was a black woman she would have been charged and charged harshly.

Because she’s white. If this was a black woman she would have been charged and charged harshly.

@Nora Woods No wonder the "justice is blind" statue is a white woman.

@Nora Woods No wonder the "justice is blind" statue is a white woman.

@Wes 100%! You took the comment right from my fingertips.

@Wes 100%! You took the comment right from my fingertips.

Probably sacrificed her child just my guess than they put airheads on the jury, and judge to not convict her.

Probably sacrificed her child just my guess than they put airheads on the jury, and judge to not convict her.

@Aya Tanaka fair enough, sorry lol im tired as shit

@Aya Tanaka fair enough, sorry lol im tired as shit

@Descend white absolutely does matter lol

@Descend white absolutely does matter lol

@ThePanduh94 white doesnt matter. But there definitely is a bias towards women.

@ThePanduh94 white doesnt matter. But there definitely is a bias towards women.

@Fabian 6 comments saying its because shes a woman but the second someone mentions skin color thats too far for you lmao

She's white rich privileged girl, of course she'll get away with it

She's white rich privileged girl, of course she'll get away with it

@uzijn  Well I understand your frustration sir. But I think we need to stop for a second and think about that.. There was lack of evidence and also she and her attorney were simply too good compared to police and other attorney..

@Fabian Well I understand your frustration sir. But I think we need to stop for a second and think about that.. There was lack of evidence and also she and hers attorney were simply too good compared to police and other attorney..

@b as sad as that sounds i agree, woman def have it easier in this cruel life we live in

@b as sad as that sounds i agree, woman def have it easier in this cruel life we live in

@Wes nothing to do with gender either. You get mad when people bring up "white" because you're white, but don't care when people bring up that it's a woman?

@Boolean Illogical That's my point though. It has to do with YOU not race/sex/religion etc etc.

@Boolean Illogical That's my point though. It has to do with YOU not race/sex/religion etc etc.

It only takes a pretty woman to smile in order to influence a whole jury it seems.

It only takes a pretty woman to smile in order to influence a whole jury it seems.

@Kay S bruh stop the baseless lies. White ppl dnt get less time for the same crime comparative to poc. Jesus

@Kay S bruh stop the baseless lies. White ppl dnt get less time for the same crime comparative to poc. Jesus

@ThePanduh94 Its just the woman part that is needed, thats the key ingredient.

@ThePanduh94 Its just the woman part that is needed, thats the key ingredient.

@Fabian it does. it goes way deeper than you think

@Fabian it does. it goes way deeper than you think

@Fabian She is pretty though. Attractive people always get special treatment, no matter their color.

@Fabian She is pretty though. Attractive people always get special treatment, no matter their color.

@Taylor Burtis it kinda does tho, I hate to admit it but women get off much more frequently then men.

@Taylor Burtis it kinda does tho, I hate to admit it but women get off much more frequently then men.

@Nocthe Medic Post the actual statistic then. Because in Canada, that is extremely far from the truth, as well as many other countries. Unless this is just the US, which I highly doubt. There are mitigating factors for every single case. So stated that is false, not sure which statistics you are reading.

@Steven Norris Even if there was, which wasn't mentioned here, the prosecution still has to place Casey in the car at the time. Since the car left her possession- placing the body in the trunk is not sufficient.

@Wes why didnt you respond to the people making it about gender the same way?

@Wes why didnt you respond to the people making it about gender the same way?

@Digital_Utopia there was physical evidence linking Caylee’s corpse to Casey’s car. The defense of I didn’t do it but if I did it was an accident is an obvious red flag. She got off because the jury was stupid.

It's pretty easy when the detectives/investigators are shit at their jobs.

The prosecution needs to prove that the defendant committed the crime. And the only evidence they provided is that defendant googled how to suffocate someone, and the victim's remains where the cause of death was officially undetermined, but duct tape caused it to be ruled a homicide.

There was zero physical evidence that tied Casey to her daughter's murder. The prosecution thought that her constant lies and her apparent lack of care about her daughter was going to be enough to get a conviction.

And maybe if the jury just based their verdict off of personal feelings, instead of the rule of law, maybe they would've convicted her.

But even then, there would be grounds for appeal- because there was absolutely zero evidence that proves she's guilty of the crime.

No eyewitness, no reciepts for buying a canvas bag, absolutely no forensic evidence. Practically nothing but circumstantial evidence.

Hell, 99.9% of the reason people thought she was guilty was because she lied constantly, and didn't play the part of a grieving woman.

So I ask you - if she, like many other convicted murderers, even female ones, was able to come up with a convincing tale, cry in all the right spots, and tell lies that were a lot harder to disprove, would you still think she was guilty?

Because, if you look at the actual evidence (what little of it there was), there is nothing that proves she killed anyone. That's why the media, and this video, focused so heavily on Casey's character.

@Wes This guy is probably one of those people who parades themselves by going around saying they don’t see color, and then say shit like this.

@Honesty Rules That’s oversimplifying the contrast of racial bias in the court system. There’s more to it than black and white, but that does still play a part in it, especially when there’s a jury involved.

@Taylor Burtis I can understand that, and you’re probably right, but the numbers still show, men are much more likely to be prosecuted and experience more severe sentencing than women.

@Khedran then those 10 jurors denied 6 month old justice for her murder, and Casie can never be tried for it again.  Spineless.

Because it is a man made law. Implement divine law like how Saudi Arabia has implemented and then you see results. Crime would be down by 50 percent if Sharia law is implemented.

it doesn't matter id its a man or a woman lol XD it was just her attorney who was damn good

it doesn't matter id its a man or a woman lol XD it was just her attorney who was damn good

Ya can't have everything, where would you put it?

Ya can't have everything, where would you put it?

@Wes literally stating the obvious. If she was black or a POC she would’ve gotten LIFE. it’s literally a fact.

Didn’t expect to find a poketuber here but I guess everyone’s been sucked in to this addicting channel.

Didn’t expect to find a poketuber here but I guess everyone’s been sucked in to this addicting channel.

did u not watch the last part of the video?

did u not watch the last part of the video?

@Noah Joseph The lies and decite, besides she is pure evil

@Noah Joseph The lies and decite, besides she is pure evil

@Noah Joseph saved and forgiven by who? God isn't going to save her or forgive her,not just for killing a baby but for what she put everyone through involved,come on man

@Taylor Burtis no, women 100% get off easier for every crime. This is a statistical fact.

@Taylor Burtis no, women 100% get off easier for every crime. This is a statistical fact.

I really think she just never stopped lying and it worked out by she’s a white woman who is attractive

I really think she just never stopped lying and it worked out by she’s a white woman who is attractive

@Fabian <br>Then ideally, both of you ruin each others' lives and leave good people out of it.

@Fabian
Then ideally, both of you ruin each others' lives and leave good people out of it.

@michael brinks You can apply that to anything. I find it hot when a girl is a murderer. What’s wrong with that? It’s all personal preference

Yea that attorney know people on the inside. People think "he just know the law" while I'm reality you gotta have connections to get someone off like this.

@Fabian It makes them a simp because she's an awful person & they're willing to date/support an awful woman & allow her to use/take advantage of them.

@Jon Knows There could be a god but definitely not any of the ones we made up. Good and evil does not exist.

@Jon Knows There could be a god but definitely not any of the ones we made up. Good and evil does not exist.

@Mythos Infinite What if we are both heartless and crazy. I am Sadistic myself.

@Mythos Infinite What if we are both heartless and crazy. I am Sadistic myself.

@Fabian
Heartless and crazy people tend to ruin your life onve you involve them it. If you think keeping it to one night would keep you out of harm's way, they'll use that perceived safety to hurt you even more.

Source: I dated crazy four times.

@Jon Knows I disagree but oh well. Satins work.

@Jon Knows I disagree but oh well. Satins work.

@Jason Man, if there was a God, that little girl would still be alive. But I agree, she will get hers sooner or later.

For now. Believe me those detectives won't let it go. One way or another she will pay for killing that beautiful little girl. Just like OJ Simpson they never gave up on him and they finally got his ass,may not have been for the murders but the got him. She will get hers,if not in this lifetime in the next,it's worth the wait for me. She will burn in hell,God doesn't forget.

Especially with the duck tape over her mouth like how !

Especially with the duck tape over her mouth like how !

@Fabian that has something to do with swaying the jury, I am sure

@Fabian that has something to do with swaying the jury, I am sure

bruh she just got a really good attorney

bruh she just got a really good attorney

@Fabian <br>I would advise against sleeping with the heartless and crazy.

@Fabian
I would advise against sleeping with the heartless and crazy.

I know right? It's clear as a day that she did it and that monster got to walk away? Crazy world.

I know right? It's clear as a day that she did it and that monster got to walk away? Crazy world.

didnt expect to see you here but yeah i agree

didnt expect to see you here but yeah i agree

@Kay S absolutly yes<br>its shocking just how favorably young white women are treated compared to others, with the worst examples being compare to young black men who get disproportionally high sentancing

@Kay S absolutly yes
its shocking just how favorably young white women are treated compared to others, with the worst examples being compare to young black men who get disproportionally high sentancing

@Ian Schultz Then don't read the comments before you watch the video. It's that simple.

@Ian Schultz Then don't read the comments before you watch the video. It's that simple.

10 out of 12 jurors were set to vote guilty down the line. 2 jurors refused and eventually the jurors gave up to go home rather than hang the jury and declare a mistrial which is what should have happened

@b Lol are you trying to say theres systemic sexism?

@b Lol are you trying to say theres systemic sexism?

@gregsmw Same goes for white people vs people of color, the latter typically gets heavier sentences. Gender and race definitely impact sentencing in the US.

@bagreed.  If she was a woman of colour she'd be in jail. She lied to police officers, obstructing justice. This is insane.

@Taylor Burtis sadly it is to do with gender
statistically women in the US serve 60% shorter sentances for the same crimes
meaning a man and a woman who have both commited the EXACT same crime go to court, the man is likely to end up with more then 2ce the amount of jail time
and thats on guilty verdicts, women are also VASTLY more likely to get innocent verdicts then men, and women who have been arrested are less likely to ever go to court then men

when it comes to the criminal justice system it is sadly VERY baised in favour of women
just look at pedophilia cases, its biased to the point when adult women abuse young boys they more often then not get away without any jail time at all

'justice' system does not work for us commoners.

'justice' system does not work for us commoners.

@ThePanduh94 She's a monster and race has nothing to do with it. People who think the way you do are the problem in the US right now.

@Fabian or gender. It’s was mind games and manipulation from her and her attorney that got her free. Nothing else

@falu He was a bloody good lawyer...the defence attorney was dog water

@falu He was a bloody good lawyer...the defence attorney was dog water

that lawyer could totally take recorded evidence of a mass shooting and have the guy that committed it be sent off with a speeding ticket

if it were any other defense attorney bet

if it were any other defense attorney bet

if this was a man he would’ve got 5 life sentences

if this was a man he would’ve got 5 life sentences


Fact , a less attractive person would have been convicted ,change my mind .


No signs of mental illness ? <br>And I'm a porn star.

No signs of mental illness ?
And I'm a porn star.


Everybody hate this woman for a very good reason. She is unbearable!


how that  awful evil  woman is not in jail i dont know how can she live with  her self


"You look like angel
You talk like an angel
You walk like an angel...

But I got wise

You're the devil in disguise"


HOW COME???HOW THE FUCK??? .her diary,her tatoo,her internet srches!!!!and she walks free???? WTF????


Say what you want they still couldn’t prove it 🤷♂

It’s like you see someone coming out from a room with a bloody knife and in the room lies a dead body. The situation seems so obvious, however due to you not having a physical proof of that individual stabbing, then that obvious murderer is “nOt GiLtY”

And real life is not a mystery movie with 20 plot twist, in real life the most obvious choice tends to be the correct one, specially in this case, but that’s how broken justice is.


I just wish this case of propaganda and not truthful because this is just pure evil.


I don’t get it! Why is she free then?  She does not deserve freedom !


I know the parents fucked up really bad, but they were so good on the phone oh my gosh


This jury was as bad as the OJ jury......


Wish there was a place worse than prison for people like this…


oh boy did she manipulate her poor weak parents.


ok ok Juliette Lewis is the chick from NATURAL BORN KILLERS seriously woody an his dame crazy


did nothing ever happen to casy after being found not guilty ?

She was found guilty of lying to cops and interfering with a police investigation. She had been in jail 3 years while awaiting trial and they applied that time served to her sentence. She spent another couple of weeks in jail after the trial to finish that sentence and was released.


She has inferiority complex the way she talks to the Detectives in excitement  agrees to stuff they say without even thinking what is being said 45:20 wtf  thats her being philosophical


There was something about the testimony of George’s girlfriend. a tragic accident that snowballed.


Casey's defense was basically that she was molested as a child, therefore she couldn't possibly be guilty. And the jury ate it up and forgave her for everything, knowing fully well that she probably did it. There really has to be a point where people realize that it doesn't matter if you were hurt as a child, it doesn't excuse you killing a child as an adult.

"she probably did it" is not grounds for conviction. I too believe she did it but nevertheless you still do need evidence to convict someone in court, otherwise it's just a kangaroo court.

"she probably did it" is not grounds for conviction. I too believe she did it but nevertheless you still do need evidence to convict someone in court, otherwise it's just a kangaroo court.

@NothingToPointOut24 I agree. I hate to say it, but from what was shown in the vid, prosecution failed to make an adequate case. I agree she almost certainly killed her own child, and I personally have no doubts about it that I consider reasonable given the evidence presented in the vid, but it looks like in court, the prosecution failed.

The defence was irrelevant to the case. The case was lost due to incompetent prosecution

The defence was irrelevant to the case. The case was lost due to incompetent prosecution

@KathelDunne Yes lets pretend it doesnt happen. Which is exactly why it will continue.

@KathelDunne Yes lets pretend it doesnt happen. Which is exactly why it will continue.

Yes, so many ppl blame their bad childhood for drug abuse, sexual misconduct etc. But you can't blame a shitty childhood tthe rest of your life. They just need to get their shit together and grow up. We all have some trauma big or small but we don't blame everything on that..

oddly the molested into never being guilty (like anyone who met prince andrew as a child) wasn't even the whole reason why she wasn't found guilty. The official reason the jury cited afterwards was that they didn't have a video of the murder.

oddly the molested into never being guilty (like anyone who met prince andrew as a child) wasn't even the whole reason why she wasn't found guilty. The official reason the jury cited afterwards was that they didn't have a video of the murder.

Yeah your childhood is no excuse for how you act as an adult. I had a childhood that was so bad that if people knew what I went through they wouldn't believe it could be true.. I sucked it up and grew tf up

Yeah your childhood is no excuse for how you act as an adult. I had a childhood that was so bad that if people knew what I went through they wouldn't believe it could be true.. I sucked it up and grew tf up

Your  son on, it should be the opposite.

Your  son on, it should be the opposite.

@Derk churk Being sexist isn’t better than being racist.

@Derk churk Being sexist isn’t better than being racist.

@NothingToPointOut24 People have been given life for less

@NothingToPointOut24 People have been given life for less

yea like no prison okay but be locked away in a psychiatry then I guess. I am psychically ill but if I ever were to do something this bad I go to a hospital before telling them I am very ill and need a therapist NOW and STAY in that hospital. If I dont I want it to happen basically... And if you cant control yourselves well n did it already well - gotta get ya locked up. In either a prison or a psychiatry. why should you be free as a threat to other people.

She never was molested for her father the proof was in the video recording from jail when she was talking with her parents she said to his father you are the best father I could have. 😳?????

She never was molested for her father the proof was in the video recording from jail when she was talking with her parents she said to his father you are the best father I could have. 😳?????

Threw dad under the bus?<br>Is he going to a trial now?

Threw dad under the bus?
Is he going to a trial now?

@NothingToPointOut24 There is no way George helped. No way. He was an absolute broken man, I cannot see him ever helping with that

@NothingToPointOut24 There is no way George helped. No way. He was an absolute broken man, I cannot see him ever helping with that

@Vincenzo Del Lama No it wasn't enough to convict her, because there were several people who lived in the house Casey lived in, therefore it could not be proved Casey was the one who made those Internet searches. And the duct tape had no evidence from the murderer on it. So no, they didn't have any evidence

@NothingToPointOut24 Exactly! Thank God there are some with critical thinking skills here

@NothingToPointOut24 Exactly! Thank God there are some with critical thinking skills here

That's not true in the slightest!! The jury couldn't convict Casey because the evidence just wasn't there, it was all circumstantial, and they have to be able to convict without reasonable doubt, and I think it's obvious to an idiot that they just couldn't do that.

That's not true in the slightest!! The jury couldn't convict Casey because the evidence just wasn't there, it was all circumstantial, and they have to be able to convict without reasonable doubt, and I think it's obvious to an idiot that they just couldn't do that.

@NothingToPointOut24 did u see all the proof and how she was acting dude are u slow or sum

@NothingToPointOut24 did u see all the proof and how she was acting dude are u slow or sum

29:43 HAD

23:58 realizes she said "had" and fixes it

29:43 HAD
23:58 realizes she said "had" and fixes it

Yes, she probably did it. You can't convict a person on "probably". The jury made the right decision.

Yes, she probably did it. You can't convict a person on "probably". The jury made the right decision.

@NothingToPointOut24 She literally admitted to misleading the case (in her own words as well). Why would she do that?

@NothingToPointOut24 She literally admitted to misleading the case (in her own words as well). Why would she do that?

@CyberGothika you stand your ground in the jury process and get beat down by others who just want to submit the verdict and go home. Imagine having a group of people deciding a criminal's fate and everyone of them just wants to close the book and get out of there, let's get to a quick verdict so I can go home and  watch Duck Duynasty...

@Dogoshi N obviously. Its an easy way for a lawyer to get his female client set free or have their sentence lowered. make a false rp allegation.

@Dogoshi N obviously. Its an easy way for a lawyer to get his female client set free or have their sentence lowered. make a false rp allegation.

@Derk churk youre so cute when youre in denial.

@Derk churk youre so cute when youre in denial.

ngl i am more intrested if that abuse acusation was actualy true....i mean only shows what monsters could lurk in your family...he father seemed so nice and i wonder if the wife knew

ngl i am more intrested if that abuse acusation was actualy true....i mean only shows what monsters could lurk in your family...he father seemed so nice and i wonder if the wife knew

@Vincenzo Del Lama I agree with everything you are saying. I don’t understand why people think the death was accidental? For people to say “I don’t believe she drowned”, “but I do believe it was accidental” makes no sense! If they believe the accident theory, surly the would believe the drowning lie? To say this was an accident, I have to put to them - You don’t accidentally put duck tape over your child’s face, then accidentally watch the child struggle to breath, then accidentally watch your kid die. Did CA accidentally, wrap her kid in a blanket proven to be from her parents home, trip and the little girls body accidentally fell into a laundry bag, also from the parents home. Maybe little Kaylee accidentally came back to life, zipped herself in the laundry bag after it was dumped in the woods, pulled the tape back over her nose and mouth, then accidentally suffocated herself. I understand there wasnt circumstantial evidences tying her to the scene but when you look at ALL the other evidence, it honestly points to CA, killing her child. She waited over a month to report it, infact it wasn’t even her that did, it was her parents, then she lied to the police, misleading the entire investigation, halting any attempts to find the child, the smell of a dead body in her car, her compulsive lying that the child was with the “nanny”, that she had spoken to the child even though that was impossible as she was dead at this point, the internet search history of suffocation & SHOCK the child is found with mouth/nose duck tapped that causes suffocation, her changing her story saying she drowned, saying it was accidental, so why if that’s the case, would you put duck tape over her face,  then dump your beautiful babies body in a wood for animals to rip it apart? As a mum myself, I’d be beside myself if I knew my daughter was all alone in the woods, because even when someone dies, you still think of them as a person attached to the body they had. That kid was disposed like trash! Her death will never have justice, you don’t put duck tape on a body if they died of drowning. Why make something that was accidental look like a murder? Accidents happen but you get the death penalty for murder in FL. None of it makes sense logically. Anyone advocating and sticking up for CA, should be ashamed, as they as basically saying what happened to that little girl, doesn’t matter. That’s what is horrific in this case, people forgot a child was murdered, and focused on CA life, even though it was all based on lies.

@JustCallMe Amber so sorry for you thats awful

@JustCallMe Amber so sorry for you thats awful

In my opinion, sexual assault affords people waaaay to much social currency. Both for true victims and liars. Thats why we get get so many women lying about being a victim, because they get something from it, whether that be attention, sympathy, or excuses for behavior. Obviously, we should have sympathy for victims, but we shouldn't give them more attention or different treatment than non victims. This is healthier for everyone involved, a real victims legal ad social treatment shouldn't be influenced by a bad thing that happened to them, their abuser shouldn't have that influence over their life. It would also prevent liars from receiving any benefits from the label of 'sexual assault survivor', which would stop the lies from happening in the first place, because they lie for the benefits.

I was hurt as a child and I wouldn’t wish that on anyone let alone another child

I was hurt as a child and I wouldn’t wish that on anyone let alone another child

@Misty the Mischievous thats exactly what Im saying. The mom after all that….decided to lie to save Casey.

@Misty the Mischievous thats exactly what Im saying. The mom after all that….decided to lie to save Casey.

@NothingToPointOut24 also i find it really ironic how you're saying they're liking their own comments but they have plus 10 pn theirs and you only have 1 🤣

@NothingToPointOut24 also i find it really ironic how you're saying they're liking their own comments but they have plus 10 pn theirs and you only have 1 🤣

@NothingToPointOut24 you think it was accidental? Ive watched this case inside and out and I don't think it was accidental at all. I hope u dont get into any jury either if thats what you got from this case. Especially as she searched on top of having duct tape on her nose mouth. She even wrote in her journal that she felt the "best " in the time she was missing, she also wrote about how she had "done something sinful, something that cannot be named" like that does not sound accidental what so ever. I agreed with most you said about the court and they can't convict her with the evidence they had, however in my own opinion looking into this case it is very obvious it was her and not an accident. Not basing on emotions but all the actual evidence leading towards it, it's obvious to everyone.

@Billy Smith The main thing the prosecution was missing was a cause of death for Caylee, and they didn't have any physical evidence that placed Casey at the scene like DNA. If they had that, combined with the journal entries and the circumstancial evidence like the blockbuster tapes they could've really changed the case. Also, apparantly her parents are liars too, and are suspected of prejury or "selective memory" during the case, so it was something planned for sure.

the sad part is tat because of these cases, child abuse increase at highest rate like arthur labinjo, then stay hobson so many.

the sad part is tat because of these cases, child abuse increase at highest rate like arthur labinjo, then stay hobson so many.

@Jeff King The defense used the abuse to explain why she lied about the death and to police, not as her defense for the murder. The defense exploited the states burden of proof to simply cast doubt on whether they had enough evidence to convict her, since they didn't have direct proof or DNA/ Physical evidence to place her there or say she definitively caused the death.  and in the jury system a jury with any doubts rules not guilty.

Still it's the kind of case that kills your faith in the justice system. She definitely did it, and the fact she got to walk out and get away with murder on a technicality is infuriating.

Yeah my friend was Molested when he was a kid and he never thought about doing any over that, it's not a good defence for her, shes of course guilty, the judge made a critical error in letting her walk free she needs to be Admitted to a Instatution at the least

Yeah my friend was Molested when he was a kid and he never thought about doing any over that, it's not a good defence for her, shes of course guilty, the judge made a critical error in letting her walk free she needs to be Admitted to a Instatution at the least

in your comment you said "knowing fully well that she <b>*probably*</b> did it"   that is a not guilty verdict.   Probably is not good enough to sentence someone to the electric chair.

in your comment you said "knowing fully well that she **probably** did it"   that is a not guilty verdict.   Probably is not good enough to sentence someone to the electric chair.

but the horror she must have gone through as a child she was touched by an adult "sexually" thats pretty crazy and now i feel bad for everything she has gone though life. <br>think about the PTSD she must be facing daily OMGGGGGG

but the horror she must have gone through as a child she was touched by an adult "sexually" thats pretty crazy and now i feel bad for everything she has gone though life.
think about the PTSD she must be facing daily OMGGGGGG

@Marie Williams The person who posted the comment is confused. The reason the defense brought up Casey's "molestation" was ONLY to explain why Casey was able to bury her sad feelings when she was around strangers. They needed a reason she was good at wearing a smile when she was in pain.

The whole thing was BS,  but it was a good explanation for the jury since they didn't know anything about Casey. We had the benefit of everything we learned on TV.

I was beaten and molested n not one time could I ever hurt one of mine. I never let them out my site either unless I fully trusted them. I let my girls stay few hours with my sister n one of her girls hurt mine n ol dad tried to cover it up trying t get my baby to lie about it

That's why I hate why things like past trauma or mental illness are used as excuses to get people more lenient sentences or get off a crime completely.
I'm aware some people have lived through horrible things, but that isn't an excuse for murder. We all get dealt a hand of cards in life, some people get a good hand, some a decent hand and some a bad hand but the actions a person takes in their life are their responsibility, no one else's.
If it were up to me, factors like that would not play into someone's sentencing. It would be as simple as if they committed the crime (with proof above a reasonable doubt), then they are guilty and they serve the appropriate sentence. I would have the same outlook on the death penalty.
The only area where I'm split on is when it comes to children or teens as it's well known that people don't usually start thinking 100% straight until they're in their mid-twenties. But that wouldn't remove their culpability because no matter the age, everybody knows that murder is wrong. So I can understand how they get a lesser/more lenient sentence but I'm still a bit split on that. I think sentences should be much stricter for severe crimes and think the death penalty should be on the table if there is undeniable proof linking somebody to murder. I think if that were the case, people would think a bit more about committing crimes like that and I also think that anybody who had killed an innocent person should lose their right to life as well and get the death sentence...

@JAMBERRY They showed nothing to prove that the dad was a liar, but they planted doubt in the jury. They made that up about the dad, the Private I was there when they thought of it, they were going to say it about the meter reader who found Caylee's body but the story about the dad was better. Even you believed it based on nothing, that's why it's a good lie.

@WhyOhWhy ? It showed that he could possibly be liar himself.

@WhyOhWhy ? It showed that he could possibly be liar himself.

There was actually no proof her father molested her. Her attorney brought it up in his opening argument, then didn't mention it again. An attorney is supposed to say what they will show, through evidence, during the case. But he didn’t even try to bring in evidence to that effect. He didn’t question the dad, the mom, or Casey about it. What he did was unethical. Since he said it but didn't follow up, the prosecution could have asked that his opening statement be stricken from the record, either in whole, or at least as to that part. <br>The prosecution missed that opportunity. They also charged her with higher crimes than they could prove. Throw in asking for the death penalty, and the prosecution made a big old mess of this case.

There was actually no proof her father molested her. Her attorney brought it up in his opening argument, then didn't mention it again. An attorney is supposed to say what they will show, through evidence, during the case. But he didn’t even try to bring in evidence to that effect. He didn’t question the dad, the mom, or Casey about it. What he did was unethical. Since he said it but didn't follow up, the prosecution could have asked that his opening statement be stricken from the record, either in whole, or at least as to that part.
The prosecution missed that opportunity. They also charged her with higher crimes than they could prove. Throw in asking for the death penalty, and the prosecution made a big old mess of this case.

That ain't why. The prosecutor could not prove when or how little Caley was murdered and ethe defense exposed the fact that her father is basically a liar.

That ain't why. The prosecutor could not prove when or how little Caley was murdered and ethe defense exposed the fact that her father is basically a liar.

It’s not a defense or an excuse but an explanation, if the attorney can find no true reason that they aren’t guilty they might be but in the same sense the jury can’t prosecute someone without any real evidence being presented to them

It’s not a defense or an excuse but an explanation, if the attorney can find no true reason that they aren’t guilty they might be but in the same sense the jury can’t prosecute someone without any real evidence being presented to them

Her defense has nothing to do with it. The prosecution reached too far without enough supporting evidence and the jury couldn't convict based on lack of evidence.

Her defense has nothing to do with it. The prosecution reached too far without enough supporting evidence and the jury couldn't convict based on lack of evidence.

@NothingToPointOut24 They did charge her with all of that, she was found not guilty of murder, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter. She was found GUILTY of 4 other charges involving Caylee, and they gave her the maximum sentence of "time served", and she was released....

They didn't eat it up, they all thought she was guilty. But you can't convict somebody based on what you think, even if you feel it's obvious. You need to all agree that there was proof beyond doubt, and they all thought it was a small possibility that the child drowned in the pool.

Her defense wasn't that being molested made her kill her daughter. It was that being molested is how she was able to hide her pain her whole life, and pretend life is normal to everyone.

It was a brilliant strategy. That's why it worked. Her lawyer knew how to paint the exact picture he wanted.

Actually the defense was there is no evidence.

Actually the defense was there is no evidence.

@Learner sorry for the ignorance but what does POS mean?

@Learner sorry for the ignorance but what does POS mean?

Frrr not only that but did she cry at all while they were describing what happened o her daughter? No, but wants to cry when they start talking about her troubles! Thats just bizarre to me.

Frrr not only that but did she cry at all while they were describing what happened o her daughter? No, but wants to cry when they start talking about her troubles! Thats just bizarre to me.

WOW, Sid. I mean, have some nuance about ya, my guy!

.......................I'm just kidding, Casey Anthony is literal garbage, lol.

WOW, Sid. I mean, have some *_nuance_* about ya, my guy!

.......................I'm just kidding, Casey Anthony is literal garbage, lol.

thank you so much for explaining. it's always enlightening when a seasoned defense attorney explains the ins and outs of the very complicated legal system.

thank you so much for explaining. it's always enlightening when a seasoned defense attorney explains the ins and outs of the very complicated legal system.

@CyberGothika exact same thing happened with that tik tok guy who killed that mother driving. he was attractive so everyone fought for him and he got away with jt

@CyberGothika exact same thing happened with that tik tok guy who killed that mother driving. he was attractive so everyone fought for him and he got away with jt

@Antz Pantzz the first person I told said the same thing to me and it has fucked with me since. I was 8, I hope you find comfort in the fact that you aren't alone but I'm also so sorry that something so cruel was said and done to you. You're loved and cherished, take care 💕

PROBABLY being the key word. gotta hand it to the defense, they really hammered that home. turned a lost cause into a win somehow

PROBABLY being the key word. gotta hand it to the defense, they really hammered that home. turned a lost cause into a win somehow

it because she a girl if she was a man she would be in prison

it because she a girl if she was a man she would be in prison

@Villanelle I believe once they caught her in so many lies they rushed it and zeroed in on her. They even charged and indicted her for murder before they even found the body.. All investigators aren’t suited for high profile cases like this one was. The simplest of mistakes can ruin the investigation.

@wavebuurgSlim Exactly, the Prosecution did not prove beyond reasonable doubt - even some of the Jurors said so.

@wavebuurgSlim Exactly, the Prosecution did not prove beyond reasonable doubt - even some of the Jurors said so.

@Vincenzo Del Lama couldn’t it have also been the boyfriend though? He also would have access to duct tape, Caylee, and his girlfriends computer. Plus he would’ve stood to gain from his girlfriend having more free time.. I just like you believe Casey did it but the prosecution just didn’t have the goods.

@Presticles1 That's one possibility. Lets say for sake of argument that she didn't kill her child, then who killed her? If she was drowned in the pool why put a duct tape over mouth and put her in a trash bag and throw her body in the bushes? it proves that she wasn't drowned but murdered.

@John Smith Exactly, that's what probably means it's possible and not possible, both chances exist.

@John Smith Exactly, that's what probably means it's possible and not possible, both chances exist.

@Sid Viscus:

The fact that you said “probably” guilty is enough to acquit or find NOT guilty.
We can not find people guilty with a lucky guess or a “possibility” of guilt.

@Sid Viscus:

The fact that you said “probably” guilty is enough to acquit or find NOT guilty.
We can not find people guilty with a lucky guess or a “possibility” of guilt.

I think the reason is simpler. She was pretty and a woman and people are programmed to believe women are good mothers and if she claimed innocence that was all they needed to validate their programming.

I think the reason is simpler. She was pretty and a woman and people are programmed to believe women are good mothers and if she claimed innocence that was all they needed to validate their programming.

being molested has nothing to do with her murder. that's bullshit.

being molested has nothing to do with her murder. that's bullshit.

@louis leycuras Guilty of what exactly though? Lying? Making people up? Hate to break it to ya, but that doesnt get you convicted on a murder charge without much more evidence being against you. The fact that people cant grasp that concept is scary.

@louis leycuras Guilty of what exactly though? Lying? Making people up? Hate to break it to ya, but that doesnt get you convicted on a murder charge without much more evidence being against you. The fact that people cant grasp that concept is scary.

@NothingToPointOut24 the fact that she lied so much and that she made up people to seem believable proves that she is certainly guilty.

@NothingToPointOut24 the fact that she lied so much and that she made up people to seem believable proves that she is certainly guilty.

Sadly, that is not the case. The jury listened to the defense lawyer who actually laid it all on the table; your job as a jury is not to make a judgement call, it is to dissect the evidence provided by the prosecution and deem the person guilty in accordance. We all know she did it, the jury knows, but their charge is not to convict her on their gut feeling, which everyone shares, about circumstantial evidence.

@CyberGothika juries are horrendous there should only be appointed government officials who decide the verdict in a 1 party state, in my opinion.

Look at Derik Chauvin, he had no chance of getting free in Mineapolis because of the politics of that state, whereas with the same evidence in a southern state he may have walked free with all charges dropped, with a jury there is no consistency in the law dispite the USA only having one constitution for all 50 states.

@Vincenzo Del Lama I've shared plenty on this topic. Im not going to change your mind and you arent going to change mine so we'll keep it at that. But I guarantee that we could go through other high profile murder cases where murder wasnt proven either, and you'd say those people were guilty too based on minimal evidence and media/public outrage. Its scary what people can read online or be told by a news anchor and base their opinions all on that

Or maybe you have an issue with Casey Anthony herself. Who knows. All I know was that there wasnt much outrage from people who didnt base their opinion 100 percent on emotion, on this case, when the verdict was announced. And I can guess which category you fall under.

@Vincenzo Del Lama And BTW, you self liking your comments dont make em anymore true

@Vincenzo Del Lama And BTW, you self liking your comments dont make em anymore true

@Vincenzo Del Lama Lol I've probably said about 3 times that she deserved jailtime and was responsible for her daughters death. I guess I should be more like you and base my opinion 100 percent on emotion like a 6 year old.

Really hope you never find your way onto a jury in your life if thats the way you decide someones fate.

@Matthew Olsen I AGREE!!! COULDN'T !!! But I'm sure she's had a few

@Matthew Olsen I AGREE!!! COULDN'T !!! But I'm sure she's had a few

@Vincenzo Del Lama I never said anything about her drowning. I dont believe that she drown and never said she did and that Casey panicked. I said I believe Casey was responsible for Caylee's death and that it was accidental.

If you would convict based on that, I hope you never find your way onto a jury in this country anytime soon.

@NothingToPointOut24 I don't think, I know based on the evidence of the search history and duct tape with the conflicting statement that her daughter drowned, along with all the other evidence that she wanted her daughter gone.
Your argument makes no sense whatsoever based on the evidence and the made up story that her daughter drowned.
If her father is an ex-cop he would never help her stage a murder of an accidental death as he knew that upon an authopsy they would rule her death as drowing, and an accidental death would put her to jail for far less time than risking her being found guilty of murder. And even if they were this stupid why didn't they keep the murder story instead of saying that she drowned?

I also think her father helped her stage that. He was an ex cop and had to have seen plenty of murder scenes so he knew exactly how to make it look. In the end, it worked.

I also think her father helped her stage that. He was an ex cop and had to have seen plenty of murder scenes so he knew exactly how to make it look. In the end, it worked.

@Vincenzo Del Lama Responsible for her death and actually murdering her are two different things. If you think she murdered her, then thats fine. I dont think thats what happened at all. I think thats what she staged to make it seem like Caylee was taken and killed by someone else.

@NothingToPointOut24 not probably, she DID murder her. There wasn't "zero proof" that she did it, just by the actual facts that she researched about how to suffocate someone around the same day her daugther went missing and that her daughter was found with duct tape in her mouth/nose was enough to get her convicted, why would she duct tape her daugther's mouth after she died from "drowning" according to her?<br>The jury was batshit insane in this case and the prosecutors made a terrible job from pointing this out.

@NothingToPointOut24 not probably, she DID murder her. There wasn't "zero proof" that she did it, just by the actual facts that she researched about how to suffocate someone around the same day her daugther went missing and that her daughter was found with duct tape in her mouth/nose was enough to get her convicted, why would she duct tape her daugther's mouth after she died from "drowning" according to her?
The jury was batshit insane in this case and the prosecutors made a terrible job from pointing this out.

The real issue was the da over charging her without the evidence. He was the idiot that ruined the case, not the jurors. Learn to read bro and don’t post things when you don’t know anything about what you are talking about.

The real issue was the da over charging her without the evidence. He was the idiot that ruined the case, not the jurors. Learn to read bro and don’t post things when you don’t know anything about what you are talking about.

That and she's white and female didnt hurt.

That and she's white and female didnt hurt.

@Sodomis666 I followed the trial very closely. The prosecution had a lot of evidence. Everything except the one thing that they needed to convict Casey Anthony of the murder charge she was charged with. Florida is known for putting tons of emotion into charges without really thinking about it (see the George Zimmerman case). They couldve easily charged her with something like child endangerment, child abuse, covering up a crime, etc etc, and in reality any of those convictions and she probably would've gotten the book thrown at her. Wouldn't have been life, but it probably would've taken 10 years of her life away. And rightfully so. There's just no way any jury in the country with even any shred of a brain could send her away for life based on the liklihood that she was responsible for her daughters death. And even if that was proven, it still doesnt prove murder.

She is (at least) a pathological liar and nothing that comes out of her mouth is to be believed, therefor I would have a hard time as a juror to find her guilty without any physical evidence. Maybe this video did not present the physical evidence clearly?

She is (at least) a pathological liar and nothing that comes out of her mouth is to be believed, therefor I would have a hard time as a juror to find her guilty without any physical evidence. Maybe this video did not present the physical evidence clearly?

Exactly. And it works the other way too. A "friend", when i told her Id been molested as a child, said that ppl who have been molested as a child usually grew up to be molesters the selves. I was around 25 at the time and was mortified

Exactly. And it works the other way too. A "friend", when i told her Id been molested as a child, said that ppl who have been molested as a child usually grew up to be molesters the selves. I was around 25 at the time and was mortified

Our society is weak now. They think punishment is torture

Our society is weak now. They think punishment is torture

I mean it was just a very late term abortion so hey

I mean it was just a very late term abortion so hey

She probably did it...you said it yourself. There was zero proof that showed she murdered her daughter. And that is what the entire case against her was based on. If that wasnt proven, you cant convict based on a probably.

The jury's decision had zero to do with the excuse that she was molested. It had everything to do with the FACT that they were not able to pin Caylee's death on her.

I agree but somehow femininity and beauty seems to affect people's brains. The jury wasn't all happy, which shows how dangerous the system is. Imagine this the other way around, wrongfully accusing someone because of appearances or lack thereof.

I agree but somehow femininity and beauty seems to affect people's brains. The jury wasn't all happy, which shows how dangerous the system is. Imagine this the other way around, wrongfully accusing someone because of appearances or lack thereof.


She didn’t report her missing for a month, internet search history for chloroform, car smells like dead body, body found near home, and she seemingly doesn’t even care that her daughter is dead. At the very least she is guilty of severe child neglect and yet she walks free to this day while we have people spending years in jail for petty shit like possession of marijuana. The justice system is ridiculous.

yeah it really is shitty and back wards. Shit like this makes me feel like we're living in some twisted twilight zone of a universe.

@Sprez No. lack of proofs. Read the case.

Besides various statistics has shown women get more times for the same crimes as men and women in the justice system do not have the same support system as men.

Men who kill their wives for example in many places get the 'passionate crime' excuse and less years than a woman who kills her husband, even despite proofs of her being abused.

In UK and US, rape kits are often destroyed or not analysed by concerned parties, including police officers - and neither does the law provide a certain time limit for it to happen. Meaning many rape victims, majorly women, do not get justice.

Trafficked victims who kill their trafficker to be able to escape still get treated as if it's a 'normal' crime. And cases where women are kidnapped or die take more time to be resolved, especially when it is colored or indigenous women - which suggest the law and system is still biased towards women.

One such report is here:

https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/105796NCJRS.pdf

The claim that women supposedly get less punished by legal system is false, has been debunked already where it shows, it the actual opposite happening.

Yeah, I agree...but then I thought about it for a while. If she got arrested, who gets justice? The grandparents? Because they lost a grandchild and they wouldn't want to lose a child too. The general public? As far as any media or this documentary shows, Casey wasn't a serial killer...so in my opinion, although she deserved to spend her life rotting in jail, this would probably have been the best outcome for everyone

@Missy Blue there was a real lady with that name living in Florida. She used the combo of the names of the ppl living in front of where she dumped the body

@Kenzis bc of the media coverage they had to select ppl for the jury from Clearwater Florida that already didn’t have ‘bias’ against her. Most likely not the brightest or best ppl to judge fellow community members. SO so so many factors in this case that led to this evil happening

It even goes further then that, she was a fire fox user, the cops didn’t know what fire fox was and only looked at the search history on the internet explorer (which her mother used) she literally spent the morning looking at Facebook, most likely watching all her friends her age living life. Next she then looked up full proof suffocation and suffocation multiple times. Cops just did a shitty job

the justice system is ridiculous because youre judged by your peers. for WHATEVER reason. the jurors found her not guilty DESPITE all that damn evidence pointing to her being guilty. All you need to do is sway the opinions of the jury

Some people take beyond a reasonable doubt seriously

Some people take beyond a reasonable doubt seriously

@Hauptmann itas The evidences weren't as clear-cut as presented in this video.

@Hauptmann itas The evidences weren't as clear-cut as presented in this video.

I have to believe that karma will get her one day , for my peace of mind I have to believe that.

I have to believe that karma will get her one day , for my peace of mind I have to believe that.

I hope we live to see the justice system fixed by having shit like this addressed.

I hope we live to see the justice system fixed by having shit like this addressed.

It is not a justice system. <br>It is a legal system, and it does not care about you. It cares about keeping the image and crowd control.

It is not a justice system.
It is a legal system, and it does not care about you. It cares about keeping the image and crowd control.

like duct tape? whatever about the hiding things because apparently her dad abused her (where the fuck was thé evidence for that?) But if she died in a pool then maybe the search history for suffocation would be her trying to verify it but why would you need duct tape over an already dead child's mouth? Seriously this fucking jury was so awful they should be ashamed and I hope everyday they think about how badly they fucked up

@Marlon she completely lied about the whole work place and staff even wasted 25 mins of their time 🤬🤬

@Marlon she completely lied about the whole work place and staff even wasted 25 mins of their time 🤬🤬

@Kenzis The judge didn’t find her not guilty - the jury did!!

@Kenzis The judge didn’t find her not guilty - the jury did!!

@Starlight Wolves I said show me an example. Not a hypothetical...

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.

@Starlight Wolves I said show me an example. Not a hypothetical...

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.

Her gender definitely has something to do with it

Her gender definitely has something to do with it

I don't know whether she is the culprit or not... But she made ridiculous stories about nanny and  her never existing friends and she went to the place for find them with the prosecutor. Wasted their time knowingly and throughout this investigation she never even feel sad or sorry about her daughter (except when she feels unsecure about herself)......it's very  uncomfortable and unjustified the whole case... Very disappointing

@Kenzis She was in jail for over 2 years awaiting trial...

@Kenzis She was in jail for over 2 years awaiting trial...

If she drowned in a pool at home, why was there duct tape over her nose, mouth and face ??? Cold blooded sociopathic killer. What is she up to these days - did the bf she wanted to party with stick around?

@Dennis Richard guess you’ve never heard of the zero tolerance laws… you could literally get 10-15 for having a marijuana seed in your possession.

The smell was discussed a lot in court, and the defense tried to establish, possibly successfully, that it wasn't a reliable evidence. Casey's mother testified that it was her who searched for chloroform. A mistress of Casey's father testified that he had confided in her that the death was "an accident that snowballed". The theory of the defense states that the girl died at home, and that the death was hidden at the urge of Casey's father, so it makes sense that the body would be found nearby, regardless of how she actually died. That she didn't give a shit about her dead daughter (or at least appear not to) doesn't prove that she murdered her. When you look a bit into the details, there are a lot of them that cast doubt about Casey's guilt, in fact.

@Kenzis The judge doesn't decide on guilt, in the American system. The jury does.

@Kenzis The judge doesn't decide on guilt, in the American system. The jury does.

@Tanel Viil correct, they voted for Joe Biden

@Tanel Viil correct, they voted for Joe Biden

@Hauptmann itas the county they picked the jury pool from probably had an average iq of 85, when I saw they were using some backwoods podunk town where the average income is under 30k a year, I knew she was walking.

@bow wow That's why we don't have juries over here in Germany. Over here Casey wouldn't have gotten away with this shit. Okay, we also don't have death penalty or "life without parole" (only the very worst and obviously psychopathic criminals sometimes get "lebenslange Haft mit anschließender Sicherheitsverwahrung", which means, that you CAN be paroled after at least 15 years in prison, but not to get set free again, but to be still locked up in prison, just not in a cell, but in a kind of "shared household" with other inmates being your "roommates", which is ALMOST like being free, but not quite....you can do what you want, you live in a kind of shared apartment, you have your own room, your own food, your own shared kitchen, your own shared bathroom, but you can't leave prison anyway...). Also SOME VERY FEW convicts never get paroled or decline applying for parole. Most "life" setences last between 16 and 20 years over here, with the average life setences actually lasting 18,9 years, about 18-20% last up to 25 years and the rest....well...they're still in there....one guy has been sitting in jail for over 50 years now, he was always denied parole and during the last 20 or so years, he didn't even apply to it, probably because he understand that he missed his whole life anyway and that he probably won't get along with how much everything has changed since he got sentenced.

I mean yes of course she is very likely the killer but it was never actually proven. Therefore I think it was right that she wasn't convicted.

Another thing is her nanny zanny so her babysitting could of been her feeding her child Xanax

Another thing is her nanny zanny so her babysitting could of been her feeding her child Xanax

Why what did I say wrong<br>All said is more evil people on this planet than good

Why what did I say wrong
All said is more evil people on this planet than good

That’s why you shouldn’t have a jury of just every day normal people decide whether someone is guilty or not 🤷🏼♀I never understood that about the US justice system.

they say good people die first and bad people live longer looks to me we live in evil world<br>and evil has the upper hand  i agree totally with you

they say good people die first and bad people live longer looks to me we live in evil world
and evil has the upper hand  i agree totally with you

You can thank juries that nearly always automatically sympathize with female accused

You can thank juries that nearly always automatically sympathize with female accused

@RewiredHuman We're just talking about this case...

@RewiredHuman We're just talking about this case...

It's almost like a 1 hour YouTube video doesn't give you all the context. Sarcasm aside, this is a great documentary of the trial, but like all things, is presenting facts through a specific lens.

The "justice system" that you're referring to is a group of individuals, probably like you. To call it "ridiculous" is to imply that because you're mad, you should be able to condemn someone to death without taking time to further understand the situation.

The justice system exists to prevent surges of emotion from condemning someone to death or taking away their freedoms on a whim.

@sacha def You need to check out how many men are not getting convincted for rape, harassment and murders (especially of their female partner - often despite similar proofs as in the case of Casey)  instead of claiming 'woman privilege' lmao.

@Hauptmann itas they are haunted by it. One of the jurors said that he thinks about the case every single day in an interview

@Verm1n Aha ok, im sorry, english is not my first language, i thought it's the  same thing.

@Verm1n Aha ok, im sorry, english is not my first language, i thought it's the  same thing.

@Kenzis They jury get to decide not the judge.

@Kenzis They jury get to decide not the judge.

While I partially agree. You lose me at the end. "Spending years on jail for petty possession" is just a complete lie. You've watched too much tv. Go look up your state convictions for possession. No one is being give years for marijuana possession.

If you want to make solid point about injustice don't lie in order to make it. And hey, maybe you aren't deliberately lying but you definitely have been sold a lie.

While I partially agree. You lose me at the end. _"Spending years on jail for petty possession"_ is just a complete lie. You've watched too much tv. Go look up your state convictions for possession. No one is being give years for marijuana possession.

If you want to make solid point about injustice don't _lie_ in order to make it. And hey, maybe you aren't deliberately lying but you definitely have been sold a lie.

Find me one person with no prior record / on probation in jail for years for possession....

Find me one person with no prior record / on probation in jail for years for possession....

cares more about "stuck in this fking jail, wasting my time" when asked is the Tony thing about finding Caylee "no it's not" so let me get this right her concern is all about herself instead of her own daughter. hmmmm

If you think USA is bad, go look at Sweden or Canada lol. Convicted child killers get even less years than in USA...

@Kenzis The judge has no say in the decision, its all on the jury, which seems to have been very gullible to Casey's defense team.

and there is a ton of racist detentions and inspections... the PD is so rotten that good cops barely catch a breath

@bow wow I don't even know how those people sleep at night WOW

@bow wow I don't even know how those people sleep at night WOW

That sounds like lot of speculation :) She is really cute, though

That sounds like lot of speculation :) She is really cute, though

@Kenzis um I don't think you understand the legal system at all. No one gets declared innocent by a judge in a criminal trial, the options are guilty and not guilty. Most defendants choose to have a jury decide their guilt or non-guilt as Casey Anthony did. A jury of her peers decided the state did not meet it's burden of reasonable doubt to convict her. The judge had nothing to do with her not guilty verdict.

@Alexandre Alves a joke that's not funny

@Alexandre Alves a joke that's not funny

But.. You have to prove her guilt, that's easy with weed as evidence

But.. You have to prove her guilt, that's easy with weed as evidence

@Blake Garcia should've put questions on the nanny part. My fault

@Blake Garcia should've put questions on the nanny part. My fault

@Blake Garcia no no no, I didn't mean that she did actually have a nanny nicknamed Zanny. Im saying how there was actually a women who got harassed because she had the exact same name and background as Casey had described. She tried to sue for defamation. This is what I'm talking about
 https://www.wtsp.com/mobile/article/home/will-the-real-zanny-the-nanny-please-stand-up/67-387585955

@Missy Blue according to the video they said she wasn’t a real person, that Caylee never had a babysitter... Never heard about this case beforehand so could be that she tried to sue her (or a made-up person) 😅. Think it is far worse if the nanny isn’t a real person cuz then she’s blaming someone that she knows doesn’t exist making her guilty

@Marlon I think the nanny did actually exist, which is worse. She tried to sue and everything but it just never went through.

"The justice system is ridiculous.". Absolutely, it's a total catastrophe, failed system.

"The justice system is ridiculous.". Absolutely, it's a total catastrophe, failed system.

I think the US Justice system is like a B movie, cringy but entertaining. Kind like a bad joke.

I think the US Justice system is like a B movie, cringy but entertaining. Kind like a bad joke.

I hope the judge becomes a lawnmower instead, that would suit him more.

Out of all this evidence, the jury* chose innocence.

Wow

I hope she gets in jail one day, for some bullshit thing she does, because she isn't in jail for this already

I hope she gets in jail one day, for some bullshit thing she does, because she isn't in jail for this already

And she tried to point all to the nanny that never existed

And she tried to point all to the nanny that never existed


I can’t believe how stupid everyone in the jury is. How can you see all this and think she isn’t guilty? I hope they can’t sleep at night knowing that they let a baby killer go free.

@SirStrange "some things" is not evidence beyond reasonable doubt for murder.

@Scared Donut there was evidence pointing to her doing a lot of things. She got charged with some stuff but got away with the murder, at the same time some of the jury even realized they made the wrong decision afterwards

No physical evidence. Jury did nothing wrong. Yes she acted weird, but there was no evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

@megan Najera it was a lie. A lot of cases where someone is cornered they manifest some bullshit claim of childhood neglect or abuse. To bring more sympathy for them. But most are investigated and nothing is proven. It’s complete BS and honestly should come with a charge for slander as you are trying to ruin someone else’s life with false accusations

@Guy Yeah I have to agree. That man is an absolutely brilliant defense lawyer. Morality aside, if he did really believe she was innocent does not matter, what matters is that he convinced a nation and a jury that a child killer was innocent. And he did so in such an eloquently successful way. It says a lot about the politicization and media intervention into our law systems.

@CrazyPangolinLady although that evidence would have helped it was circumstantial. It didn’t directly tie Casey to Caylee’s death, it just made her look more guilty. There was a lot of evidence that we know now that was either excluded from trial or not presented at all. The prosecution really dropped the ball.

@Imari Williams <br>Not a single shred of doubt, a REASONABLE doubt.  The prosecution fucked up when they didn’t look at the Firefox history.  If they’d shown that the history said “fool proof suffocation,” she would be in jail.

@Imari Williams
Not a single shred of doubt, a REASONABLE doubt.  The prosecution fucked up when they didn’t look at the Firefox history.  If they’d shown that the history said “fool proof suffocation,” she would be in jail.

The thing is... the jury didn't see "this". What they saw was the trial and the evidence provided within that specific scope.

Because everyone is Not guilty, until the Other Thing is surely proven. And thats a really Important law (even If Things Like this Here might Happen)

That's the american court system for you.

Strictly speaking the basis of innocence is beyond a reasonable doubt. What this means is that if it is a genuine |possibility| that someone else could have reasonably done it then you should let the person go. For example just because someone is a lying sociopath doesn't mean that they are necessarily the killer. Further some of the public knowledge that is most incriminating was kept from the jury for a variety of legal reasons.

It's worth noting the big problem in the US isn't people getting off because they are rich or white, it's poor and minorities being convicted despite clear reasonable doubt. Heck more often then not the prosecution to be pressing charges to begin with.

Well I can tell you who is sleeping probably even more comfortable than before. Her name now infamous, what she saw as a burden is now out of her life, and there is nothing to show for it. Her pretty face and money saved her again. Karma will come. And it will strike harder than it ever has before. I do wish that sweet baby haunts her dreams though...

@Shanks They were eager to get back to their barbeques and their fireworks. It was near the 4th of July. It makes me sick.

@Guy Just the fact that she intentionally lied about her daughter's whereabouts and hid things from EVERYONE (not even talking about going to the police, she could've at least confided in some people) is all the evidence you need to know! They had A LOT more evidence to convict her, but didn't. There's people sitting in jail over circunstancial evidence. Yet she's out there living her life like nothing happened. At least negligence should have been brought up to the table. Even if she didn't lie a finger on that baby, she should've been convicted. At least some years in prison.

Jury probably got told he was gonna get a quicky if they let her go

You clearly don't know anything about the law. They over reach on their charges

They do think Casey is guilty. But this doesn’t mean they can convict her due to the lack of evidence. It was only inquiry that was provided. It is pretty clear that she murdered her 3 year old innocent daughter. This is probably another example of women getting the benefit of the doubt when charged for a crime 😑

@megan Najera nah she was taking to her dad like she missed him and loved him when she was in jail, even saying he was “a great dad.  So I’m guessing it’s bull.

@Guy exactly. The burden of forming a case beyond reasonable doubt is the job of the prosecution. The defense only needs to create a single shred of doubt, obviously they were successful.

@megan Najera if she was or wasn’t it doesn’t justify anything, lots of people go through worse things but you don’t see them killing their child

We have the benefit of hindsight we now can centralise and go through all the evidence with the knowing that she did do it, and I have to be honest sitting in that room with that defence not knowing if it is fact or not, he gives a damn good performance. Money was on her side with that defence it saved her

@megan Najera doesn't matter. The case is about did she kill her daughter or not.

The jury selection process must have started like this "Ummm, D'uhhhhh"


It's fascinating how detached from reality she was for thinking that her childish lies could work with detectives... Even more fascinating is that those lies actually worked.

@Ghofran Alahmadi I'm not talking about her ability to lie, i'm saying that her lies were incredibly stupid. Telling cops about people that don't even exist and saying that you have a job that you actually don't have is just dumb.

@darius As a defence attorney if you are representing who you know is a monster you want to give them a very good trial, that way they can't re appeal for mistrials and therefore put the victim's and their families under the stress over and over again.

It's a double edged sword.

They didn't work, they got her arrested and contributed as evidence and she was put in a courtroom.

Her defence team is what worked.

@Bullshit Department although I agree with you that it isn't out of the ordinary in the sense that many lawyers do this, to say it's their job and imply that the point of a lawyer is to defend a client even if it means to disregard the constitution is just questionable to me. also to say its their job kind of makes me think you're saying they arent allowed to decline the case, but they have every right to, which is the right thing to do in this situation.

to be fair, she told her lies very convincingly. if I hadn't known better, I would've 100% believed her just because of the way she told them and her confident tone. like how do you even do that? how do u lie that well? its terriying.

@darius no. It's what I said. Not defending the system, just saying that that particular lawyer isn't doing anything out of the ordinary.

@Is it over yet? As far as the jury is concerned, they very obviously bought into the idea that they needed to have some concrete proof of Casey murdering her daughter in order to indict her, which is just silly. We can't only convict killers who are caught on video killing someone. We can and do look at the body of evidence, including circumstantial evidence, to make conclusions. And the only line I think the defense really crossed was when they perpetuated the unprovable lie about Casey's father molesting her. It was a cheap, shitty, immoral and unnecessary thing to do and they knew it. That, plus even after the Not Guilty verdict was handed down, her lawyers did all of the media rounds saying that  she didn't have anything to do with Caylee's death, which is both unnecessary from her lawyers and obviously a lie. Gaetz even wrote a book later pointing the finger at the father to make more money off the the trial. Anyone who believes anything Casey or her lawyer says really needs mental help.

@Bullshit Department the job of a lawyer is to accept and parttake in perjury? lol.

@OhMyArceus087 my brothers a lawyer and said he never had respect for criminal defense attorneys or anything of that matter..... they are monsters

@darius its their job lol. Their job is to defend their client to the best of their ability. Which implies abandoning morality. That's how the system is meant to work.

I'm confused if there was duct tape on the body of caylee, why did the defense say she drowned in a swimming pool? Uhh, there was literal duct tape showing she was killed in other means.

The fact that the jury got pursuaded is crazy but what i really can't fathom is that these lawyers can plea her free knowing full well that she has killed her child. I could not live with myself knowing i have set free this monster back in society once again.... They actually take pride in it.. Makes me question who is the real monster there...

@Is it over yet? this is nonsense. the case was full of reasonable doubt, especially for a first degree murder charge.

Technically... it did work and thats the CRAZY part

she is literally free rn chilling with her boyfriend, the childish lies definetly worked

@Is it over yet? the problem isnt the court system in the human evolution Humans are trained that woman needs to be protected and man not (you can work with 5 man and 100 woman to refill the population but not reversed) so the basic human nature is to help woman and rejekt man who need help because man are a burden.

@Is it over yet? some attorneys are the real monsters for putting aside their morals and ethics just to benefit financially and/or keep their client success rates high.

@Loc o Her attorney’s lies worked with the jurors, because IMO, they wanted to believe the BS being fed to them. For whatever reason, it was easier for them to accept her father, George, was the big bad wolf, instead of facing the reality that Casey’s a cold blooded murderer, who killed her daughter for the most selfish reasons possible. Whether people want to admit it or not, men & women are treated VERY differently in the court systems.

I believe it's not lies that worked it's rather matter of something that does not work


Heard she’s doing okay. She’s living it up at parties and having a grand ass time. Heard she immediately called the police over a little cup of water being thrown at her which says a lot that she didn’t call police for her dead missing daughter that she murdered

@Shelby Young good luck. Make sure you have skills that other countries want/need.

@Shelby Young good luck. Make sure you have skills that other countries want/need.

Does she travel with an entourage of security? One wld think she wld be terrified of being recognized in a crowd of random people.

@Realm of the misunderstood they dont need to explain how she killed her daughter. Her daughter is dead, she was the last person to see her, she lied about absolutely everything, she didnt report her missing for 31 days. In australia she would have been founs guilty.

@Shelby Young because.... Either he didn't do it!!!! Or... He paid with the girl off his flesh and blood he loved... His grand baby...

@Shelby Young mens rea is enough to prove a person guilty

@Shelby Young mens rea is enough to prove a person guilty

@FromNothingICome
People have honestly been in for far less. Did you see the one about the two false accusations. One of the dudes got two years and it was probably because the system had already chewed him up and spit him out before.

@FromNothingICome
People have honestly been in for _far_ less. Did you see the one about the two false accusations. One of the dudes got two years and it was probably because the system had already chewed him up and spit him out before.

@Shelby Young <br>Because apparently they dropped it immediately after it was first brought up on the grounds of no evidence whatsoever. 🙄

@Shelby Young
Because apparently they dropped it immediately after it was first brought up on the grounds of no evidence whatsoever. 🙄

@Old Ironsides so you think that she didn't report her daughter and made up all the lies because she was innocent? Get out of town. She absolutely deserves everything she gets from the public.

@FromNothingICome she should of at least got child neglect lol could you imagine if this was a man oh god

@FromNothingICome she should of at least got child neglect lol could you imagine if this was a man oh god

@Realm of the misunderstood Could they have charged her with hindering evidence..her lawyer said how the kid died..so she would have too.

@Shelby Young Narcissistic/Psychopathic women will lie about abuse in order to play the victim and get out of accountability. This is very common amongst the malignant ones

Apparently she's even dating a police seargant

Apparently she's even dating a police seargant

@Mark Webb You should do investigative work on that then. Get them justice. What do they say?  See something? Say something.

Any forms of contact we can spam her with?

Any forms of contact we can spam her with?

@FromNothingICome Newsflash: semantics kinda sorta matters in the field of law.

@FromNothingICome Newsflash: semantics kinda sorta matters in the field of law.

@Realm of the misunderstood Why do they need to explain how she killed her?

@Realm of the misunderstood Why do they need to explain how she killed her?

@FromNothingICome How the hell do you know that the jury did what they were supposed to do? Did you forget how that sentence started?

She was a compulsive liar. Her father did not abuse her. Shame on her and her lawyer.

She was a compulsive liar. Her father did not abuse her. Shame on her and her lawyer.

@Not Me Not Me I know it’s just that they lied about her dad touching her

@Not Me Not Me I know it’s just that they lied about her dad touching her

@Shelby Young Did you even watch the last few minutes of the video. The prosecution failed to prove she was guilty. It has nothing to do with her dad.

@Shelby Young her dad never ever touched her.

@Shelby Young her dad never ever touched her.

Yes and the spat she had was over a guy both women were seeing! Kicker being he’s a Police Officer!! 🤬

Yes and the spat she had was over a guy both women were seeing! Kicker being he’s a Police Officer!! 🤬

Bro you must have smoked some good Cali weed. There is no way in gods green earth this isn’t a case of “ complexion for the protection”. Say as you well, people are convicted in trails everyday in America. With the smallest amount of evidence. This woman had everything minus the body 🤣🤣.

I can tell when people low key (r) 🤷🏾♂

She probably didn’t even go to her own child’s funeral

She probably didn’t even go to her own child’s funeral

@Shelby Young America's not perfect, but with everything else that's available, USA is as good as it gets.

@Shelby Young America's not perfect, but with everything else that's available, USA is as good as it gets.

yeah, and i recently learned once you’ve been tried for a crime and have been convicted not guilty for that crime you can’t be tried for that same crime ever again but makes so mad to know she’s a free murderer. caylee would be in high school now, she would be around my age, maybe a junior, getting for college and graduation and life and her mother took it all away

@Guitar Player Factory Channel they shouldn’t have let her out until they can find the culprit. I figure don’t let her just on the account of it took her 30 days to call the police. Negligence. I’m dumbfounded and can’t believe they got muffled up by a bunch of liars

The best part about it is that Casey doesn't even bother to think about the consequences of her INACTION, as well as her actions. If she is willing to call the cops that quickly over something so silly, then there is obviously another reason she didn't call the cops when Caylee went missing. She really is a piece of work.

@FromNothingICome only thing i disagree with this is the "in America" part. Everything else, totally agree.

@FromNothingICome that lawyer is going to hell.

@FromNothingICome that lawyer is going to hell.

@Angelic some article i read said one of the jury says his verdict still haunts him 10 years later and wished he pushed harder for one of the lesser charges.

@FromNothingICome I've watched women just say rape and men have gone to prison over it.

@FromNothingICome I've watched women just say rape and men have gone to prison over it.

jail. She didn't throw the water on herself.

jail. She didn't throw the water on herself.

@Realm of the misunderstood They actually can. It's called jury nullification, look it up. A guilty verdict can be appealed, would be better with a new trial than letting the obviously guilty go free.

@Totallynotkyubey How did this case go so wrong? And everyone watched it happen. Living with part of her defense team?! Geez! Isn't that conflict of interest or SOMETHING?

@Realm of the misunderstood Wow. You're bringing up stuff that happened much later in the case. The moment I heard "she has been missing a month and you HAVE NOT called the cops?", I was like, well this is an open shut case. I was so wrong. And you're right about how the case was handled. Poor shame.  No justice for a little girl that is a ghost to everyone but her own mother.

I read that too and couldn't agree more.
911 Dispatch: What's your emergency?
Casey: They are throwing water at me!
Dispatch: When did this happen?
Casey: Like, RIGHT NOW!! (foot stomp)
Dispatch: And what is your name?
Casey: Casey Anthony
Dispatch:...... Casey Anthony. Caylee's mom?
Casey: Yeah, whatever. Are you gonna arrest these people for what they are doing to me?
Dispatch: Yep. Call us back in a month.
click dial tone

I read that too and couldn't agree more.
911 Dispatch: What's your emergency?
Casey: They are throwing water at me!
Dispatch: When did this happen?
Casey: Like, RIGHT NOW!! (foot stomp)
Dispatch: And what is your name?
Casey: Casey Anthony
Dispatch:...... Casey Anthony. Caylee's mom?
Casey: Yeah, whatever. Are you gonna arrest these people for what they are doing to me?
Dispatch: Yep. Call us back in a month.
-click- dial tone

@FromNothingICome your screen name tells me your keyboard must be very very sticky.

@FromNothingICome your screen name tells me your keyboard must be very very sticky.

@G R I too have served on juries and what GR says is true.  REASONABLE DOUBT, not absolute.   She is a horrible person.

@FromNothingICome she made up people she knew, people she hung out with, who does that to the police, who doesn’t  care if she has friends or not.  Only a habitual liar who can convince herself things did or didn’t happen. Something very wrong with her, no way she didn’t do it.

@FromNothingICome But is it 'proof, or 'doubt' that matters? No one had any doubt, reasonable doubt. No one had the proof, but it drew a circle tightly around her and no-one else. That removes doubt for me.

That defense attorney did it..."So if you have any remaining questions, it hasn't been proven, and you cant assume', and all the jury went 'I guess not'. My question would be "who did it then Casey?", and not let her free till she finds someone who is guilty.

Well said ..... couldn't agree more with you

Well said ..... couldn't agree more with you

@Shelby Young was that also a lie, or did she actually get touched? That’s the question I would be asking. Following her long list of lies she was caught in, why should that be taken at face value? She clearly holds no respect for anyone or anything, so what’s to prove that the same doesn’t go for her parents? She spent several months lying to them daily. She didn’t love them any more than a dog loves its bone. Once the flavor is gone, it’s a useless husk that’s discarded.

@Realm of the misunderstood she at least could have been charged with lying to officers or neglect, since she admitted she had “no idea” where “Zanny” took Kaylee.

@Realm of the misunderstood there was so much evidence that pointed to her being the murderer

@Realm of the misunderstood there was so much evidence that pointed to her being the murderer

@Shelby Young nope. That’s not why. The prosecution failed to explain HOW she killed her daughter. This is largely a failure on the part of the prosecution. The jury has to follow rules, you know. They can’t JUST reach a verdict based on how they feel.

@FromNothingICome You need to revisit the burden of proof for a criminal case, because you’re seriously wrong. The prosecution needs to prove guilt beyond any REASONABLE doubt, not beyond “any shadow of a doubt” as you said. They don’t have to make, “…a slam dunk case PROVING the defendant DEFINITELY committed the crime” as you said. That would be insane, tons and tons of guilty people would roam free. Instead, the prosecution has to make a case that any reasonable person has no reason to doubt that the defendant committed the crime. Our justice system leans towards allowing the guilty to go free rather than imprisoning the innocent, as this case sadly shows, but what you’re proposing is beyond nuts. I’m so glad our justice system doesn’t stand on the foundation you think it does.

@Wardaddy fuck I wish we could. Same with the murderer of Selena Quintanilla.

@Wardaddy fuck I wish we could. Same with the murderer of Selena Quintanilla.

@Ghost Jasmine same I’m gonna go swinging blindly

@Ghost Jasmine same I’m gonna go swinging blindly

if i see her in the streets it’s OVER. god bless caylee poor soul

if i see her in the streets it’s OVER. god bless caylee poor soul

@Angelic I know they did. As a victim of sexual abuse it disgusts me that they made it up and now she’s free

@Angelic That's easy to say as an outsider, but we didn't sit through that trial hearing every piece of evidence and every word of testimony, and ultimately the jury did what they were supposed to do.

IDK if you've ever served on a jury in a criminal trial, but they tell you very explicitly that the state has to prove their case "BEYOND ANY shadow of doubt!"

That means if you don't think the state made a slam dunk case PROVING that the defendant DEFINITELY committed the crime, your duty is to vote "not guilty," regardless of what you think "might be" or "Probably is" true.

In the US we don't send people to prison over "might be" or "probably."

At least, we're not supposed to...

And sure, she LOOKS guilty as shit... But did the state actually PROVE that's the case?

But I will say A- googling suffocation seems pretty damning... And pretty stupid.

And B-- that damn lawyer was worth every penny! lol

@Bes like why didn’t he get charged with it lol

@Bes like why didn’t he get charged with it lol

@Angelic same. All because she got touched by her dad, it’s okay that she hid her daughters body.

@Angelic same. All because she got touched by her dad, it’s okay that she hid her daughters body.

@Shelby Young I pretty much hate the entire jury now

@Shelby Young I pretty much hate the entire jury now


This was arguably the worst miscarriage of justice I've ever witnessed. My faith in the justice system was already dangling by a thread. This severed that thread.

I can’t understand why someone would take the cases as attorneys to defend someone who is clearly guilty of the crime… I couldn’t be a lawyer for that reason

Did you not listen to a single thing the video explained to you? You overlook the fact of what was said and discovered? How she masked everything up because she was sexually abused by her dad? It became part of her character. Psychologists during the trial gave testimony as to how this works. Why she was unable to display emotion. Jeez, you really drink that koolaid huh

This poor baby. I’ll never forget this case. It shook me to my core because how could anyone do what she did to her own child? And not have a single ounce of remorse. It’s sickening

I suppose in the end the court of public opinion has deemed her guilty, and she can no longer live a normal life as Casey Anthony, so in a way she’s receiving the punishment

Ultimately her punishment is that no one will ever believe a word she says ever again

that must've been some durable thread to last this far...

Right up the with oj, robert blake, and the spider sabich murder

@Jamal Labarge zimmerman was on community watch duty, also you can follow people in public especially if you are on community watch, even with all that said it was trayvon who attacked zimmerman FIRST

@GUITAR STYLINGS SAMUEL LETIZIA zip it old man

@Zachary Moore Wrong. It was the prosecutor bringing the wrong charges.  Each charge they brought (even the manslaughter ones) required proof of premeditated malicious intent. This could not be proved and left the jury no option to find negligent or culpable manslaughter (which is very feasibly what happened). Then the failed to bring other minor charges (e.g. disposal of body) which may have got some jail time. It's not the system, it's the poor use of the system in this case and it's ridiculous to blame the jury. They followed the law.

You realize its not the system that's the issue, its the public citizens, the jurors. People like your friends, neighbors, coworkers. People have turned into idiot's who have zero common sense yet think they're brilliant....

What a deep, deep statement…. There’s layers behind your thought process and it’s very, very intriguing…….

Lol. I’m just kidding.

The thing wrong about this case is how incapable the prosecutors were in proving their claims. They didn't show sufficient prove therefore she couldn't have heen charged. I definitely think she did it, but this is the prosecutor's fault

@Leonardo Landi to be fair, this is what the founders one of the judicial system to be. Make sure a thousand guilty men can walk to prevent an innocent man being incarcerated

absolutely. How did they overlook her blatantly lying about so many things?? Disgusting.

@Mr Ex Dexter wasn’t a vigilante he just wanted to kill, the show tells you Dexter has this issue of needing to kill. But it’s Harry that persuaded him to kill other killers. Dexter doesn’t care about justice or anything like that, he’s just fascinated by the act of killing someone.

@Nu-Metalfan 26 Yes. But then again he wanted to kill people that killed. That was the original idea behind Dexter. If you ask me, if Dexter was a real serial killer, I have no sympati for the worst killers he killed.

@justin  <br>Zimmerman case got it right.  💯

@FYMM CA I am watching again because I want to see if all those details were available to the jury.

Well, consider its swampland Florida too.  That's a factor as well.

@FYMM CA Hmm. Surly this should be a case study on improving it? Or, is this justice?