I don’t understand how there’s no evidence? She lied about EVERYTHING! Where her daughter was, there wasn’t even a nanny, that she still worked, the list goes on. This is in the most infuriating case! She is guilty, absolutely!

You know all those crazy stories of "Florida man" and the memes. Well I'm pretty sure the entire jury was full of "florida mans". The type that have been arrested for robbing a store with an alligator, or trying to buy food with monopoly money.

@Chakra_SSE With everything we know, no. She seems to be guilty. BUT, we don't know that much about the case AND my opinion doesn't really matter. If you think that, you have to make sure that you can proof it - so you must have evidence beyond reasonable doubt. And they messed that up, I think. If 12 people who are really in that case agree for not guilty, most likely the prosecutor messed up OR she is not guilty but sold as guilty.

@Sqwan2 Would you say with everything we know about this case, that Casey was innocent?

@Sqwan2 Would you say with everything we know about this case, that Casey was innocent?

@Надежда Неженка Yes, an that is done in courts all the time. A single piece of evidence is just evidence and no proof. You have to build a body of evidence that is large enough or strong enough to remove the doubt. Than it constitutes proof. And you need the proof for a conviction, not evidence.

@Sqwan2 according to your theories, EVERYTHING can be disputed and refuted. Even in your own example of someone seen at the crime scene - well, they just happened to be there.

@Sqwan2 according to your theories, EVERYTHING can be disputed and refuted. Even in your own example of someone seen at the crime scene - well, they just happened to be there.

Надежда Неженка

@Sqwan2 ok, what about the duct tape on  the remains of the girl? Isn't that alone is evidence enough?

@Sqwan2 ok, what about the duct tape on  the remains of the girl? Isn't that alone is evidence enough?

Надежда Неженка

@Gamer For Life I don't think this story is over. Something will come out. Double Jeopardy law would prevent another trial from what I have read but this would not stop something incriminating coming out.

@Gamer For Life I don't think this story is over. Something will come out. Double Jeopardy law would prevent another trial from what I have read but this would not stop something incriminating coming out.

@Gamer For Life I would not take that right from you.

@Gamer For Life I would not take that right from you.

@pinball1970 innocent or not, I would exercise my rights.

@pinball1970 innocent or not, I would exercise my rights.

@Gamer For Life If you were innocent would you not want to put your version across?

@Gamer For Life If you were innocent would you not want to put your version across?

@pinball1970 if I was on trial for my life, I would exercise my right to not have to take the stand. Can't punish someone for exercising their 5th Amendment right.

@pinball1970 if I was on trial for my life, I would exercise my right to not have to take the stand. Can't punish someone for exercising their 5th Amendment right.

@Gamer For Life If I was on trial for my life I would take the stand. Obviously we are not seeing the full picture of how the evidence was presented.
We are being asked (as a juror say) to accept her story. A drowning story that did not emerge for two years. Did she kill the child? No, the child was left alone for long enough to drown in a pool and somehow ended up in a swamp with duct tape wrapped around the head. I would have rejected that story and looked at the alternative. Murder.
We know the drowning story was made up as she said recently that she didn't know how she died. (Audio in an interview)
The father denied abusing her in the trial. There is absolutely nothing she said about that kid that was true.
Is there, video, DNA, eye witness evidence? No.
Her stories had zero evidence to support them so she either killed the child or knows who did.

@pinball1970 don't get me wrong I'm not saying there wasn't evidence. What I'm saying is there wasn't enough hard evidence to link Casey to the murder. Like I said, it's not what you know, it's what you can prove. Was her behavior extremely suspicious, yes! But suspicion doesn't prove guilt. The prosecution didn't do the greatest job of linking the evidence to Casey. They made statements like, "Casey killed her then wrapped her in a blanket...." but didn't prove she actually did it. It's complicated and sad because this poor little girl didn't get the justice she deserved. <br>I'm not going to say my opinion on if Casey did it or not. Just wanted to explain a different way of looking at what the evidence actually told. Did it point to Casey as a suspect. YES. Did it prove she did it? Not in the way they presented it.

@pinball1970 don't get me wrong I'm not saying there wasn't evidence. What I'm saying is there wasn't enough hard evidence to link Casey to the murder. Like I said, it's not what you know, it's what you can prove. Was her behavior extremely suspicious, yes! But suspicion doesn't prove guilt. The prosecution didn't do the greatest job of linking the evidence to Casey. They made statements like, "Casey killed her then wrapped her in a blanket...." but didn't prove she actually did it. It's complicated and sad because this poor little girl didn't get the justice she deserved.
I'm not going to say my opinion on if Casey did it or not. Just wanted to explain a different way of looking at what the evidence actually told. Did it point to Casey as a suspect. YES. Did it prove she did it? Not in the way they presented it.

You have to have substantial evidence, not circumstantial. It's not what you know, it's what you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

You have to have substantial evidence, not circumstantial. It's not what you know, it's what you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

@Unknown Name Yes the drowning story was complete crock. She was interviewed recently and she claimed that she 'Did not know' what happened to Kaylee so all that nonsense was a lie in court.<br>The abuse story was also contradicted by the father so that could have been bullshit too.

@Unknown Name Yes the drowning story was complete crock. She was interviewed recently and she claimed that she 'Did not know' what happened to Kaylee so all that nonsense was a lie in court.
The abuse story was also contradicted by the father so that could have been bullshit too.

@pinball1970 why the hell should you hide a body that Has drowned over a month ago?? You don't have to be a genious to make her look guilty

@pinball1970 why the hell should you hide a body that Has drowned over a month ago?? You don't have to be a genious to make her look guilty

Also the post-mortem said she died of asfictiation then defence claim she drowned there was no evidence of the drowning beaten lie

Also the post-mortem said she died of asfictiation then defence claim she drowned there was no evidence of the drowning beaten lie

@Henrik Henrik here gets it<br>perfect explanation on the case

@Henrik Henrik here gets it
perfect explanation on the case

@Nick Kromka she was in a bar fight nit that long ago 😂 it was in the news. A lady spilled her drink on her and Casey called the police... she calls the police when someone spills a drink on her but not when her daughter was missing smh 🤦 😒

@Erick Carriera Yeah, of course, there is a jury of 12 agreeing  people, who are following the whole trial, but you are the lucky one who can do better from watching an 1 hour tape. What a masterpiece of Dunning Kruger...

@Erick Carriera Yeah, of course, there is a jury of 12 agreeing  people, who are following the whole trial, but you are the lucky one who can do better from watching an 1 hour tape. What a masterpiece of Dunning Kruger...

@pinball1970 I agree. We have Caylees law now which is 1 good thing that came out of this horrible event.

@pinball1970 I agree. We have Caylees law now which is 1 good thing that came out of this horrible event.

@Erica Bouchard It would be nice if the law protected two year olds who died in questionable circumstances first and foremost.

@Erica Bouchard It would be nice if the law protected two year olds who died in questionable circumstances first and foremost.

@Erica Bouchard I am not involved with law so I would be interested in a neutral qualified view on this from a professional.<br>All my mates are STEM guys.

@Erica Bouchard I am not involved with law so I would be interested in a neutral qualified view on this from a professional.
All my mates are STEM guys.

@Kevin Bolton I am not focusing on her lies, I don't need to prove she lied. I am looking at the body, evidence relating to that and plausibility of a two year old died accidentally dying in her mother's care then ended up in a swamp. The drowning was just another lie so what happened?

@pinball1970 <br>I agree that it’s obviously a homicide. But the OP was saying that the fact that she lied “is” evidence thst she did it, but those two things are unrelated. She seems to be of the opinion that just because someone can be proved to be a liar, they should automatically be found guilty of murder.

@pinball1970
I agree that it’s obviously a homicide. But the OP was saying that the fact that she lied “is” evidence thst she did it, but those two things are unrelated. She seems to be of the opinion that just because someone can be proved to be a liar, they should automatically be found guilty of murder.

@Kevin Bolton They ruled the death a homicide after the body was examined. One thing is certain there is an awful lot about this case that does not make sense.
Casey Anthony did not testify at the trial but her father did. My guess is they would be worried she would incriminate herself.
Her father denied abusing her so that story could be a crock as well.
Casey said in an interview recently that she did not know how Casey died, this was recorded and you can hear her say it. I'll try and post the link.
So the drowning story is definitely a crock.
Some of the lab tests were thrown in doubt regarding, traces of chloroform and gases relating to decomposing tissue. There were some major forensics fuck ups that that defense used to a non technical jury.
There were Google searches on 'Chloroform' and 'suffocation' on the home computer using Casey's id the days before that were attributed to Cindy the mother NOT Casey by the defense. Cindy was clocked in at work at the time the searches took place.
So how did she do the searches? She left work early. Sure they had an answer for everything but the jury was asked to accept some tall explanations.
They are looking to put forward a new law in some states as a result of this case. Relating to reporting a missing child.

@pinball1970
While it is true that duct tape around head is evidence of foul play, it is not e evidence that ‘she’ put it there.
Would you like to be convicted of murder because someone you knew was murdered and the prosecution argued that their hands were taped behind their back with duct tape, so that points to foul play, so that points to you.

@pinball1970 <br>That’s my entire point. These ‘facts’ you have listed, aren’t “evidence”.

@pinball1970
That’s my entire point. These ‘facts’ you have listed, aren’t “evidence”.

@Kevin Bolton Curious, tattoo, partying etc not evidence. Yes. Why you miss duct tape out? Wrapped around the the nose and mouth?

@Kevin Bolton Curious, tattoo, partying etc not evidence. Yes. Why you miss duct tape out? Wrapped around the the nose and mouth?

@Kevin Bolton I do understand the 'concept of evidence' I have a degree in applied Biology and use something called the Scientific method in my job. Empiricism. Something you may not be aware of.

@Kevin Bolton I do understand the 'concept of evidence' I have a degree in applied Biology and use something called the Scientific method in my job. Empiricism. Something you may not be aware of.

@Kevin Bolton It's really not a good idea to speak to someone who you never met like that.
I just listed the facts.
READ my post

@Kevin Bolton It's really not a good idea to speak to someone who you never met like that.
I just listed the facts.
READ my post

@pinball1970
Again. E V I D E N C E!!!
A person cannot be found guilty of murder based on their internet search history, nor getting a tattoo, nor going out to a club.
I hope you are never allowed anywhere near a jury, as you simply don’t understand the concept of ‘evidence’.

@Kevin Bolton I am totally ignoring the charade she presented. I am just focusing on the fact the child died in her care and was dumped in a swamp with duct tape round the head. Someone from her IPE googled suffocation the night before and then the kid was never seen again.
As a parent, the absolute LAST thing I would do is dump my kid in a swamp after accidentally drowning, get a tattoo that life is beautiful, enter in my diary that it was 'the right decision' then go party.
She killed that kid and got rid of the body.

I don’t think you understand quite how the law works. Yes, she made up an entire persona for a nanny that never existed. But how is that evidence that she murdered her own daughter? She told the police that she worked somewhere that she didn’t. We know that’s a lie. But how is that evidence that she murdered her own daughter? We know that she lied to the police when she said that a work colleague had introduced this fictitious nanny to her. But how is that evidence that she murdered her own daughter? Are you seeing a pattern here? There is no evidence that she murdered her child. How are you not understanding that?

@Sqwan2 As soon as someone reverts to insults you know the argument must be weak. Also the smart people ask questions, those who have made their minds up already will not learn.
This case we have been talking about gets even more bizarre, law suits against Casey Anthony after the trial and details in the trial too. Her father got rid of the body??? She did not speak at the trial?
Very strange.

@pinball1970 Of course most americans are decent and I had many nice discussions. Unfortunately the others make sure that they get noticed. It doesn't bother me anyways. It's just sad that the not so decent people often times destroy everything constuctive.

@Sqwan2 I have some good American contacts, I suppose they are like everyone else, some decent and others not so much.

@Sqwan2 I have some good American contacts, I suppose they are like everyone else, some decent and others not so much.

@Ted Lambert I watched it again. Some key things missing for me. I would have liked to have seen some of the cross examination. She did not actually tell police where the body was? Also no details about where how and why she dumped the body.

@Masroor Ahmad Bani This can happen, yes. But you have 12 people, choosen by both sides. In the USA all 12 people have to agree on the verdict or you have a "hung jury" (this is not uncommon). Also most americans are decent people. <br>It doesn't prevent them from making a mistake, thats right. But we were not part of the trial. We have watched a video, carefully edited by a person with its own intentions, a person who also has an opinion. Even if the editor tried to make the video open minded (what I doubt, because youtube doesn't work like that, it works with echo chambers), it still mirrors his or her biases. So in doubt, I give the jury the benefit.

@Masroor Ahmad Bani This can happen, yes. But you have 12 people, choosen by both sides. In the USA all 12 people have to agree on the verdict or you have a "hung jury" (this is not uncommon). Also most americans are decent people.
It doesn't prevent them from making a mistake, thats right. But we were not part of the trial. We have watched a video, carefully edited by a person with its own intentions, a person who also has an opinion. Even if the editor tried to make the video open minded (what I doubt, because youtube doesn't work like that, it works with echo chambers), it still mirrors his or her biases. So in doubt, I give the jury the benefit.

@pinball1970 My native language is german. Normally I keep that for me because americans tend to get biased (not to say racist) once they hear it. That can make a reasonable discussion pretty hard.

@pinball1970 My native language is german. Normally I keep that for me because americans tend to get biased (not to say racist) once they hear it. That can make a reasonable discussion pretty hard.

@Sqwan2 I mean history does repeat itself and were all human. the american justice system has its flaws and the people on jury duty also might have a bias when it comes to someone who is white and female.

@Sqwan2 I mean history does repeat itself and were all human. the american justice system has its flaws and the people on jury duty also might have a bias when it comes to someone who is white and female.

@Sqwan2 That's good thanks. Yes we learn more from each other being civil.<br>What is your native language? If I may ask?

@Sqwan2 That's good thanks. Yes we learn more from each other being civil.
What is your native language? If I may ask?

@Masroor Ahmad Bani Ah, because someone else had done stupid things in the past, we should repeat that as often as possible. This is a really special way of learning from mistakes in the past...

@Masroor Ahmad Bani Ah, because someone else had done stupid things in the past, we should repeat that as often as possible. This is a really special way of learning from mistakes in the past...

@Sqwan2 I would suggest that you watch the infographics show. It has shown multiple cases of people being wrongfully convicted and given the death penalty(mainly people of colour) with little to no evidence. Based on the presentation here and the evidence shown to the jury, there was a high chance that she would be getting the death penalty in my opinion.

@pinball1970 Well, when I was young I thought I wont need english ever again after school. So I attended english class mostly for the pursuit of chalk. That wasn't very smart. I had to learn english later in an evening class. I went to Ireland for a year to work there and get more fluent but my grammer and my spelling is still not that good. So I feel honored by the fact that you didn't guessed it :)<br>I really enjoy this conversation. It is nice to talk to someone on social media who is intelligent and well behaved as well.

@pinball1970 Well, when I was young I thought I wont need english ever again after school. So I attended english class mostly for the pursuit of chalk. That wasn't very smart. I had to learn english later in an evening class. I went to Ireland for a year to work there and get more fluent but my grammer and my spelling is still not that good. So I feel honored by the fact that you didn't guessed it :)
I really enjoy this conversation. It is nice to talk to someone on social media who is intelligent and well behaved as well.

@Sqwan2 No I hadn't guessed that English is not your first Lang. You are obviously intelligent! I need to watch again and more importantly find out which details were given to the jury.
That is what is important for me.
I will check in soon mate.

@pinball1970 I hope you didn't get me wrong (I am not an native english speaker as you probably already guessed). I don't want to shut down the discussion if you are really interested in it. People on social media (including me) tend to overinvest just for the sake of argument. Most likely these arguments become very rude pretty soon. Just would like to prevent that. <br>I am also interested in your view. And maybe you can convice me.

@pinball1970 I hope you didn't get me wrong (I am not an native english speaker as you probably already guessed). I don't want to shut down the discussion if you are really interested in it. People on social media (including me) tend to overinvest just for the sake of argument. Most likely these arguments become very rude pretty soon. Just would like to prevent that.
I am also interested in your view. And maybe you can convice me.

@Sqwan2 Ok no problem. You presented a different view so I was interested. Peace fella (as we say in the UK, in Manchester at least!)

@Sqwan2 Ok no problem. You presented a different view so I was interested. Peace fella (as we say in the UK, in Manchester at least!)

@pinball1970 Please don't waste your time on me. This discussion is intersting but for me not worth to watch it again.
Both of us are civilised man. I think we can deal with other opinions without being offended.
If we were both in the jury we might have a discussion. But we would work that out. Most likely we would have much more information on the case. This video is about an hour long, so there are parts missing. Maybe I would be with you if I had all the evidence. From what I can see from the video, I think the jury and the judge did the right thing. The prosecutor didn't do his due diligence in my opinion. But I am also fine with yours.

@pinball1970 I don't say she is innocent. I also don't say, that everything went right. And I absolutely don't argue in favor of her. <br>I argue in favor of the law system. It is designed to protect innocent people risking to let a murderer slip. Considering that, I think the jury and the judge made the right decision. It isn't their mistake that a murderer maybe is free.

@pinball1970 I don't say she is innocent. I also don't say, that everything went right. And I absolutely don't argue in favor of her.
I argue in favor of the law system. It is designed to protect innocent people risking to let a murderer slip. Considering that, I think the jury and the judge made the right decision. It isn't their mistake that a murderer maybe is free.

@Sqwan2 I don't think feelings come into too much, we are not connected to the family. It is a tragedy yes.
I said the same to Ted Lambert.
The facts are the child died in her care and she then disposed of the body.
She then went out partying, wrote she was happy in her journal.
She is asking us the accept that is how a distraught mother would behave.
She googled suffocation and the recovered body had duct tape on the head? (I will watch it again, I can't remember all the details)
I do not accept her story the child died via accident. It is about plausibility and nothing in her story adds up.
What I don't know is if the jury were privy to details that JCS provided.
Perhaps not all those details were presented as evidence? Admissible?

@Ted Lambert I don't know how the law works just some basics. I have been on jury service once and they said a guilty verdict has be beyond reasonable doubt via the facts of the case. The facts here, she admitted to dumping the body.
If your child drowns you call an ambulance immediately. Even if the child is dead a mother in desperation calls 911 with a glimmer of hope?
She didn't do that, she dumped her in a swamp.
A distraught mother would then do what? Go partying? Write in her journal that she was happy? All the rest was a red herring so she would not get caught, the fabrication regarding the nanny and work colleagues.
When did the accidentally drowning story arise? After two years? Apologies I have forgotten some details.
She was in charge of that child who subsequently died and she got rid of the body. Two options, it was an accident or she killed her. I have no doubt she killed that kid.

@Bill the Fifth no, I also like them imprisoned, too. But not at all costs. I also like to be free myself. And the system is designed to protect that freedom. It is better to let 100 murderer slip than imprison one person falsely. This is meant to protect you. You shouldn‘t let your feelings take over. This can come back to you like a boomerang…

@pinball1970 and she was found guilty of that correct?! Her lying and them able to prove she lied is evidence that she lied to the police...gave false information. Not at all is proof she murdered her child. Pretty simple.

@Sqwan2 You should edit your comment to correct the mistakes.

@Sqwan2 You should edit your comment to correct the mistakes.

@Sqwan2 Her conduct is absolutely bizarre following her daughter's death. She's out partying while Caylee rots in her trunk with duct tape on her mouth. And then she knows her daughter is dead and is lying out of her ass . Not to mention her callous reactions to her family and friends' concern over her missing daughter. This is not the behavior of an innocent person, and in almost every murder case ever, it incriminates the suspect. Also how the heck do you figure her Googling "foolproof suffocation" methods on the night Caylee disappeared is "not evidence"?

@Krazy Reckz I must have missed the part where they said, that child murder is allowed if you are a woman.

@Krazy Reckz I must have missed the part where they said, that child murder is allowed if you are a woman.

@clovery This is exactly how the law works. That's why this woman is free...

@clovery This is exactly how the law works. That's why this woman is free...

@Sqwan2 None of that is how the law works...

@Sqwan2 None of that is how the law works...

The defense presented an alternative explaination that the prosecutors could not disprove.  This alternative explaination would also explain why she lied. The defense agreed that she certainly had some majors screws loose(but said it in a way that would sound more sympathetic) and disputed the cause of death. Given that Casey was really messed up it is reasonable to believe that she would have acted the same if her daughter had drowned in the pool due what is ultimately negligent behavior on her part.

The fact that she lied was no more than circumstantialt evidence regarding the charge of murder. They only proved that she had something to hide, but offered no direct proof on Caseys involvement in Caylees death.

@ShelbyCookie2000 yes she is, but that doesn't mean that she murdered her. She is allowed to lie if she will incriminate herself otherwise. Negligent child abuse would be a crime. Especially if you try to cover it up. Also it is not her duty to assist the police in whatever task they might have todo. Just becuase she wasted police time doesn't mean she killed her child. 9 times out of 10 it is a good thing to was the time of police. In this time they cant harass innocent people or shoot black people in the back. <br>Of course she knew that her daughter was dead. But that doesn't mean she killed her. I also know that my grandma is dead, but I didn't kill her. Even though I was partying many many times since then. That is not how it works.

@ShelbyCookie2000 yes she is, but that doesn't mean that she murdered her. She is allowed to lie if she will incriminate herself otherwise. Negligent child abuse would be a crime. Especially if you try to cover it up. Also it is not her duty to assist the police in whatever task they might have todo. Just becuase she wasted police time doesn't mean she killed her child. 9 times out of 10 it is a good thing to was the time of police. In this time they cant harass innocent people or shoot black people in the back.
Of course she knew that her daughter was dead. But that doesn't mean she killed her. I also know that my grandma is dead, but I didn't kill her. Even though I was partying many many times since then. That is not how it works.

Sqwan2 casey obviously didn’t blow up the moon wtf are you talking about “the moon isnt a star” so theres no evidence lmao

Sqwan2 casey obviously didn’t blow up the moon wtf are you talking about “the moon isnt a star” so theres no evidence lmao

@Zach L Name one piece of real evidence.

@Zach L Name one piece of real evidence.

@Sqwan2 First, there was evidence in this case. It just wasn't concrete enough for this jury I guess. Secondly, your examples are hilarious. Especially the first one, like what the fuck are you even talking about lmao.

@Sqwan2 First, there was evidence in this case. It just wasn't concrete enough for this jury I guess. Secondly, your examples are hilarious. Especially the first one, like what the fuck are you even talking about lmao.

they gave decision in favour of her  just because they were angry at media trial.

they gave decision in favour of her  just because they were angry at media trial.


Why all these cases involve journals, I always thought they were a thing in movies and people didnt actually document their everyday to day lives.  ESPECIALLY if they were criminals


Of course she did it, isnt she at least guilty of misleading the investigators? she was caught in multiple lies, what an amazing legal system... Don't comit any crimes unless you got the money to pay for it, ffs what a joke


All children deserve parents.<br>Not all parents deserve children.

All children deserve parents.
Not all parents deserve children.


I cannot with the lies, i dont know how the detectives are holding up..


This woman has had a life time of not being held accountable for her actions. Mummy and Daddy let her get away with murder.

Tf are y'all on about, they clearly aren't on her side and from what I heard, to this day believe that she is guilty.

@Shimmer pretty dumb comment. Rape and murder as a single act has a more lengthy sentence than drug dealing.

@Shimmer I see this narrative all the time, yet no one ever presents stats. Where are the stats and documents you guys get this info from? Or do you just get it off of social media and youtube videos? I'm not saying you're wrong, i'd just like some proof. It's no secret that innocent people go to prison and petty shit like selling weed accrues a ridiculous sentence, but the whole "murderers and rapists get off scot-free" seems disingenuous.

They didn't. Well, technically. They fed into it very much but, they still stood up when... their grandchild got kidnapped... and Cassey was... well it could have been worse? That's not helping their case much but they're not the worst here by orders of magnitude. They just... feel sweet yet... so... so... hah...

Σκοτώνω Χαρά

@N.A.C..80 Now that you point it out. Yeah. The 'hello gorgeous' was just not right. Would explain a lot of things too. Like why the parents covered up all of her mistakes. If her father could do that to her, I think he would do that to Kaylee too in the future. You're right. They're all weird.

@Sreenidhi Shukla I think it's probably true. Maybe the mum knew about it and not said anything. Would explain why she has a lack of empathy and love for her own child. She was probably blackmailing them to get her own way. "Hello gorgeous" is not the way you greet someone accused of murdering your grandchild. Something was very wrong with all of them. Yet all of them are free.

Yeah she was definitely that kid with no boundaries or discipline

@Shimmer Yes it's totally disgusting. I bet someone in prison now with a longer sentence than her for weed. Weed which is now legal in most parts of America. Americas legal system is insane.

Drug dealers are given harsher prison sentences than murderers and rapists. Let that sink in...

Not that just any murder, the murder of their own flesh and blood. Sickening.


also what I don't understand is with all the inconsistencies and the lies she told how did she get off and be not found guilty! Who did she know to get out of her situation? It's obvious that she did away with her daughter I don't understand for the life of me why she was not convicted and why she is not sitting in prison.


one of the grossest injustices in american history. people on that jury should be fucking ashamed of themselves


How about the fact that she never reported that her daughter was missing, how can the state over looked that fact


How do you know Casey is lying?

She exists...


rest in peace, Caylee. I'm so sorry you didn't get justice. you deserved better.

@Shahnoor Maredia Because as long as a woman is a mother she's not guilty

@Eric Taylor yes well done thats exactly what I said. not the reason I gave - clearly it's because of your own fallacious argument. Well done you absolute genius

@Angie's Tales from Wales You don't want to continue this  conversation cause I've backed you into a corner have a good day.

@Eric Taylor sorry but you must be reading the wrong comment or something because I have not said that anywhere, I simply said "rest in peace, sorry you didn't get justice" which for some unfathomable reason you seem to be furious at and you're outright refusing to explain what the hell you're going on about to me and applying your own logical fallacies to me. so im not interested in continuing a discussion with someone who is just inexplicably angry with me wanting a baby girl to rest in peace.

@Angie's Tales from Wales No a fallacy means a unsound argument based on false beliefs and or idea's, we are not debating that a child was found dead but that it was a cover up and you're case the fact that Casey mom said that she was the one on the internet looking up the site's so thus your debating false beliefs and idea's.

@Eric Taylor sorry but what are you talking about? you're making no sense whatsoever. how is it a "fallacy"? a fallacy is faulty or deceptive reasoning, how exactly is my saying "rest in peace" a fallacy? or how is me saying I don't know how the little girl died a fallacy? I am not using any faulty or deceptive reasoning, in fact you'll find my comments pretty straightforward and easy to understand

@Angie's Tales from Wales The prosecutor ask the jury how caylee died? And the jury could not answer! If she would have  covered it up the jury could have answered that question thus what you're trying to argue is a fallacy.

@Eric Taylor obviously not, because none of us were there. whether she killed her or someone else killed her and she covered it up, a little girl is still dead and never got justice. hence my comment.

Can anyone tell me what really happened to caylee? No! and the jury couldn't either!

I thought you wrote Casey… I’m not finished with the video yet, so I was <b>confused</b>

I thought you wrote Casey… I’m not finished with the video yet, so I was *confused*

This is all fucked up. How does the jury fall for that lame excuse and manupilation by that dishonest and immoral lawyer is beyond me. The mare fact that she was partying after her daughter was allegedly missing immidiately tells she had zero care about her daughter and only logical answer is because she killed her.


"we forgive anything you've said, or done" 🤨


Detective Allen should have interrogated Amber Heard


Cheney Mason has to have made the most foolish and arrogant statement of all time @1:06:50. Dude is a complete laughing stock.


I just saw this and I'm speechless,  I guess a ghost killed the little baby, I'm so lost


The whole case is bizarre but the verdict is unbelievable.

@Cronus Captain damn. And people go to jail for less than that. I guess it's what Americans want, the majority of the jury wanted her free, just like the majority of Americans made Donald Trump President. To the outside world, Americans want the Whites to remain in power not being held guilty for their crimes. I'm happy not to be born in the US.  As a young kid, I always wanted to visit the US, but now lol. No thanks

@Cronus Captain what kindnof Jury leaves this psycho out in nature? With all the evidence there was against her.

@Brandon Lowery right?? that’s the first red flag. she didn’t even tell anyone that caylee was missing, that is so sketchy

@Cronus Captain yeah you have to have a hell of defense because based off circumstantial evidence she’s guilty it’s a open and shut case. She waited a whole month to report her baby was missing ?

Incompetent prosecutors eager to make a name for themselves tend to do that.


I can’t quit commenting on this video. How did the jury not find her guilty… how? What am I missing? We’re they paid? The search result alone is damning enough.


she should have been convicted . and sentenced to a lifetime of imprisonment .


She killed her daughter,she wanted to be free.She knew where her daughter was.And lied and is a liar.