She is writing a book about her life after Caylee's death, which I beg people not to buy... She also tried to make a movie. Which Covid derailed. Thank God. She has lately been discussing having children again. Uhg. <br>That jury failed Caylee. Horribly failed her. In every sense of the word. Disgusting.

She is writing a book about her life after Caylee's death, which I beg people not to buy... She also tried to make a movie. Which Covid derailed. Thank God. She has lately been discussing having children again. Uhg.
That jury failed Caylee. Horribly failed her. In every sense of the word. Disgusting.

FFS.. How she couldn't have had a IUD in the a dr just "forgot about" over a decade ago is insane. Wolves could raise those children better.

@vidura Buddy, that's cringe as hell. Based on your pfp, you're not a 9 year-old 4chan edgelord. You're way too old to pretend you're Dexter.

Yes the did! Totally failed that beautiful girl!

Yes the did! Totally failed that beautiful girl!

movie already came. in her very own name.

movie already came. in her very own name.

Knowing that makes me cringe. Having a murderer walk around freely and attempting to spread knowledge about how to get away with lying.

Knowing that makes me cringe. Having a murderer walk around freely and attempting to spread knowledge about how to get away with lying.

So if she gives birth, wouldn't that be theoretically repaying her dues/deeds.<br>Mr Diaz (lawyer) sure is a professional 👏

So if she gives birth, wouldn't that be theoretically repaying her dues/deeds.
Mr Diaz (lawyer) sure is a professional 👏

I saw a magazine talking about how she's a mother again today. I didn't look inside, just saw her on the cover and remembered this case. The magazine also used the picture that makes her look crazy.

She's writing a book???  Are you kidding me??
Forward written by OJ Simpson?
Illustrations by Bill Cosby?
Fuck sakes people...

She's writing a book???  Are you kidding me??
Forward written by OJ Simpson?
Illustrations by Bill Cosby?
Fuck sakes people...

Hopefully the book reopens her case and she faces justice.

Hopefully the book reopens her case and she faces justice.

@ScoCon86 How dare you treat anybody 'Mentally Challenged' when you're the only one who insults and attacks others in the first place? The underlying irony of your attitude is tremendous.

@vidura you misspelled "piece of shit" as "unique human being". It's ok we all make mistakes

@vidura you misspelled "piece of shit" as "unique human being". It's ok we all make mistakes

@HotCoffee Yes, these people are insane. Equally disgusted by some of the comments as by Casey.

@HotCoffee Yes, these people are insane. Equally disgusted by some of the comments as by Casey.

@ScoCon86 Plus the death penalty was on the table. A jury doesn't want to send an innocent person to death row, so even the slightest bit of doubt will shut down a guilty verdict. I think the prosecution was too comfortable and assumed it'd be a slam dunk.

If she did murder Caylee then the jury did nothing wrong, the prosecution failed her. It's a tricky case, one very disturbed mother and two parents who have a questionable past but present well. Where did these sociopathic traits come from? we can't know but I regard everyone in this case with suspicion. The conspiracy's floating around about this are some of the only ones I will ever believe, there's a whole lot we'll never know. One thing I will definitely say though is that Casey never should have been allowed to keep her child

@vidura Tell your children that if your'e a parent if you're not tell your parents yourself <br>If you know better learn to love people unlike Casey Dammit!

@vidura Tell your children that if your'e a parent if you're not tell your parents yourself
If you know better learn to love people unlike Casey Dammit!

@Al Zach's response applies to you as well.

@Al Zach's response applies to you as well.

@Al Why do you keep making all these unfounded accusations about me instead of addressing the points I've made? What am I googling? What don't I understand? You keep acting as if you're the arbiter of all things court related, without ever being on a jury, as you apparently aren't understanding of how a jury goes over information given to them.

You say, "If a jury has true reasonable doubt and acts against it they are breaking out laws". I ask you, WHERE DOES THAT REASONABLE DOUBT COME FROM?? It comes from the jurors, discussing the matter. All the jurors are are individuals with differing opinions. When presented with contradicting evidence, many of them will have different views and "what if" scenarios. Its up to them to converse, then agree on a single outcome. That outcome doesn't always reflect reality, though, but you still seem to think all the info presented to the jurors are facts, and they aren't there to determine whether or not the defendant or prosecutor are presenting false facts.

That logic is contradictory, though, because you've admitted multiple times, jurors do determine whether or not someone is guilty. "Despite how unfair you see it", those jurors were wrong when they "rendered a verdict solely with the information provided"(along with their own views when given contradictory evidence), and came to the conclusion Casey wasn't guilty, thereby letting Caylee down by not convicting her mother. How is this not the case? Where am I wrong? Stop attacking me ad hominem in order to cover up your ignorance. Justify your position, Al, and don't bring up irrelevant info again.

@Ray so you truly see no fault with the performance the prosecutor put in or the way the defense lawyer introduced reasonable doubt (if a jury has true reasonable doubt and acts against it they are breaking our laws despite how unfair you see it). It’s only the jury’s fault?

I don’t see any need to continue interacting with you. It’s pretty obvious you are just googling definitions and scrambling to form sentences with them, despite not understanding any of the interactions within the system.

@Ray oh god, still sticking with the jury convicts the guilty thing. Semantics is everything in this case, it’s again the basis of our legal system. The jury does not presume guilt and seek to confirm it, the jury listens to evidence and weighs whether there is sufficient proof or reasonable doubt to render a verdict on a person who is in a state of innocence in the courtroom until proven otherwise. You seem to not grasp semantics at all.

@Al I keep telling you I'm aware of how they get their information. I'm aware of how the court system works. I've literally been on jury duty.. twice.. I'm telling you, It doesn't matter how the jury came to their decision, because HER MURDERER IS FREE. Since her murderer is free, she wasn't given justice. Since she wasn't given justice, she was failed by those who were supposed to give her justice. You literally just said the jurors are "allowed into deliberation by the judge". What do you think they're doing in there? They're going over the case, then determining the outcome. THEY determine the outcome. Here's the definition of deliberation "Jury deliberation is the process by which a jury in a trial in court discusses in private the findings of the court and DECIDES WHICH ARGUMENT TO AGREE UPON. After receiving the jury instructions and hearing the final arguments, the jury retires to the jury room to begin deliberating."<br>So, you can't refute the jury were the ones who gave her the not-guilty verdict, and can't refute Caylee's denial of justice after her murderer was given this verdict, so I don't understand why you're still even here. It's absolutely nonsensical to say Caylee wasn't failed, or let down, when her murderer wasn't convicted, regardless of whose fault it was. It's just as absurd as saying a jury doesn't convict those who are guilty.

@Al I keep telling you I'm aware of how they get their information. I'm aware of how the court system works. I've literally been on jury duty.. twice.. I'm telling you, It doesn't matter how the jury came to their decision, because HER MURDERER IS FREE. Since her murderer is free, she wasn't given justice. Since she wasn't given justice, she was failed by those who were supposed to give her justice. You literally just said the jurors are "allowed into deliberation by the judge". What do you think they're doing in there? They're going over the case, then determining the outcome. THEY determine the outcome. Here's the definition of deliberation "Jury deliberation is the process by which a jury in a trial in court discusses in private the findings of the court and DECIDES WHICH ARGUMENT TO AGREE UPON. After receiving the jury instructions and hearing the final arguments, the jury retires to the jury room to begin deliberating."
So, you can't refute the jury were the ones who gave her the not-guilty verdict, and can't refute Caylee's denial of justice after her murderer was given this verdict, so I don't understand why you're still even here. It's absolutely nonsensical to say Caylee wasn't failed, or let down, when her murderer wasn't convicted, regardless of whose fault it was. It's just as absurd as saying a jury doesn't convict those who are guilty.

@Ray lol dude. The irony of claiming someone can’t process by logic. Where do you think the jurors get the information in order the make the decision? And you keep sticking by this “they are there to convict the guilty” line and don’t understand why you are writing in circles. They are there to render a verdict solely with information provided by both sides and allowed into deliberation by the judge.

 I still can’t stop laughing that you truly said it doesn’t matter how the jury came to their decision… it’s too much. Enjoy high school little buddy,.

@ScoCon86 And I've explained to you multiple times, it doesn't matter how they came to the conclusion, they failed Caylee when they failed to convict her murderer. Both of you keep bringing up irrelevant info, when the fact of the matter is, the jurors are there to "give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court". In this case, if their verdict reflected reality, Casey would've been convicted as the murderer she is. She wasn't convicted. Meaning, the Jurors verdict was wrong and they subsequently failed Caylee.

@Ray I also explained several times to you why you are wrong in assuming the jury is independent of whatever the prosecution and defense says to them. So I am now done attempting to explain it to you further, since you are stuck with your misunderstanding of how US Justice works.
However, I wish you the best, and I hope you live longer than you're supposed to. Good luck.
Oh, and I'll let you have the Last Word - you're welcome!

@Ray I understand being pissed at the outcome and the lack of justice for this little girl but the people you’re actually pissed at are the prosecution team for not being able to handle the burden of proof and provide the jury evidence outside of a shadow of doubt that the judge allowed for deliberation and the fact that they got chased out of the court room by a sleazy little defense lawyer who successful out doubt in some of their minds. That’s all it takes. A sliver of doubt, if they had convicted despite the sliver of doubt it would have been wrong. This is the system we work with.

@Al I'll make it incredibly simple for you. Lets say a demolition crew was set to destroy a building. Everything goes as planned, but later, they find a body in the rubble. Did they fail this dead person? Sure, they didn't have knowledge of his whereabouts and he could've snuck in at any time, but that person is dead and Its their role to ensure no one is in the building prior to it blowing up. They failed to ensure this, as evidenced by the dead person, so they failed said dead person. Just as, that jury failed to do their job, which is to convict the guilty, so they failed Caylee. This isn't a debate.

@Ray  you obviously don’t have anything past middle school understanding. Their job is not “to convict the guilty” the way you phrase it alone shows you don’t have the understandings they are there to render a verdict based on presents evidence. If you followed the trial you saw how hard the defense lawyer worked the case and how poorly the prosecutors did. If it’s just up to the jurors to “convict the guilty” what are the judge and lawyers for?

You keep just writing in circles insisting your right without actually backing up your claim and you continue to display amazing ignorance. It’s crossed back into funny again. How they came to the decision that she wasn’t guilty is EVERYTHING. The fact that you think it’s nothing is the nail in your coffin.

@Al No, Al, you're just adding in irrelevant factors, subsequently skewing your view on the matter. If you've been following, you'd know I previously stated I'm aware of how court procedures work. I also followed the trial. It doesn't matter how they came to the decision she wasn't guilty,("court procedure and jurisprucence" in mind,) they failed Caylee when they failed to convict her murderer. Plain and simple. If you don't believe so, justify your reasoning for believing Caylee was done right by them not convicting her murderer. There is no third option here. Either Caylee was done right by the outcome of the trial, or she wasn't.

@Ray you’re wrong dude. You have way too simplistic, 6th grade civics view of how court procedure and jurisprudence work. Jurors must come in with a completely neutral standing and ideally no contamination or knowledge of the case prior, and any contamination from news etc is ordered to be disregarded by the judge. They may only work with that is presented in court. And you’re misunderstanding or ignoring reasonable doubt and innocent until proven guilty. Only one juror needs to be 99% sure instead of 100% and it’s a hung jury, simplistically. You’re kind of being confidently wrong here..

@ScoCon86 so it wasn’t that it was a woman for the defense, it was that particular woman… you might wanna think about how to express yourself a little better

@Ray the defense disputed everyone of those pieces of evidence, the developer of the software that analyzed the browser search history admitted at trial that “chloroform” had been searched for only once and there was a flaw in his software, the defense never claimed that Anthony was always honest with investigators (and she was never “on the stand”, she declined to testify at trial), and the child could have been in the trunk after dying accidentally (like drowning in the swimming pool like the defense postured).

I watched a lot of the trial and agreed with the verdict. The prosecution should not have sought the death penalty against her and they relied too heavily on Anthony’s poor moral character; the jury was reluctant to convict her of murder/manslaughter without seeing any evidence as to how the child died. The prosecution should have charged her with multiple counts of obstruction of justice.

@ScoCon86 Yes, I stated these things... I was forced to do so multiple times because you still don't seem to understand what I'm trying to convey, despite me being clear and concise. I will not reply to your nonsensical, unfounded ad hominem attacks in the following paragraphs. In stead, I'll attempt to clarify one more time. Since you like to quote verbatim, I'll do so as well.
<br>In response to the original commenter stating, "the jury failed Caylee", you said, "it's not the jury's fault". I then came in and said, "the jury is there for one reason, to decide whether or not the defendant is guilty", "the jurors failed to see that, so they absolutely did fail Caylee". You then said, "Juries don't work like that", then spewed off with irrelevant info again. Tell me, ScoCon, If juries aren't tasked with convicting the guilty, why is the definition of "Jury", "a body of people (typically twelve in number) sworn to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court"? Also, tell me how they did Caylee justice by not locking up the person who murdered her. I don't care about all these irrelevant details about how the court system works. I am telling you, ScoCon, they did not do this little girl justice by letting her murderer of a mother off scott free, so they failed her. There are only 2 options here. Either the jury did Caylee right by not convicting her, or they did her wrong. Since you believe they didn't do her wrong, explain how they did her right. Don't attack me ad hominem again. Justify your position.

@ScoCon86 Yes, I stated these things... I was forced to do so multiple times because you still don't seem to understand what I'm trying to convey, despite me being clear and concise. I will not reply to your nonsensical, unfounded ad hominem attacks in the following paragraphs. In stead, I'll attempt to clarify one more time. Since you like to quote verbatim, I'll do so as well.
In response to the original commenter stating, "the jury failed Caylee", you said, "it's not the jury's fault". I then came in and said, "the jury is there for one reason, to decide whether or not the defendant is guilty", "the jurors failed to see that, so they absolutely did fail Caylee". You then said, "Juries don't work like that", then spewed off with irrelevant info again. Tell me, ScoCon, If juries aren't tasked with convicting the guilty, why is the definition of "Jury", "a body of people (typically twelve in number) sworn to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court"? Also, tell me how they did Caylee justice by not locking up the person who murdered her. I don't care about all these irrelevant details about how the court system works. I am telling you, ScoCon, they did not do this little girl justice by letting her murderer of a mother off scott free, so they failed her. There are only 2 options here. Either the jury did Caylee right by not convicting her, or they did her wrong. Since you believe they didn't do her wrong, explain how they did her right. Don't attack me ad hominem again. Justify your position.

also Casey is starting an investigative firm with the defense lawyer who worked on her case. they are also rumoured to be dating

also Casey is starting an investigative firm with the defense lawyer who worked on her case. they are also rumoured to be dating

That One Guy From Teen Titans Who is Really Robin

@Lightspace You are the one who isn't understanding of the situation. You can refer to my most recent response to ScoCon. Also, I don't think you even saw the trial. If you did, You wouldn't say anything about "poor proof and evidence to go on".

@ScoCon86 Why don't you explain to me exactly why you think I'm "special needs"? You said it isn't the jury's fault she wasn't convicted, when they are literally the ones who give the verdict on the matter. I'm aware of how juries work, and what due process is. It doesn't mean the jury didn't "fail Caylee", when they failed to convict Casey, especially when it was obvious she did it. She had hear head "buried and slumped" when hearing the recording of her mother calling the cops after finding her 31 days after Caylee went missing, smoking weed and doing drugs with a friend. When asked by her mother where Casey was, she said her babysitter, a person never verified to exist, took her daughter 31 days prior, and she was using her own methods to track down Caylee. Instead of calling the cops and giving herself the best shot at finding her kid, like a normal person would do, she was found doing drugs with a friend, without a single care in the world, not doing anything but what she wanted at the time. The defense tried to say Caylee drowned in the family pool and Casey's father helped her dispose of the body, which her father denied. They even said her father abused her as a child. They couldn't even use that in court because there wasn't any evidence. She lied so many times during the trial, no normal person could possibly believe she isn't guilty. They failed to see this, and, subsequently, failed Caylee. This isn't a debate, ScoCon.

@ScoCon86 Are you really telling me jurors don't give their verdict on legal cases? Is this really the hill you want to die on? Tell me then why judges say, "the jury finds you guilty". Why is it that when you search something like, "jurors role in the legal system", you receive the same answer, "The jury decides whether a defendant is "guilty" or "not guilty" in criminal cases, and "liable" or "not liable" in civil cases."? Your entire response is nonsensical.

@ScoCon86 The jury was there for one reason, to decide whether or not the defendant is guilty. This person was guilty, but the jurors somehow failed to see that, so they absolutely did fail as a jury.

@Mahdia AhseenThe lawyers did fail, yes, but they're first mistake in the courtroom was in going with a not-so-subtle misogynistic angle from the beginning. Attempting to use a woman to explain how moms are supposed to treat their kids.
But of course someone read my opinion the wrong way - it's expected on opinion-based, "you-be-the-judge" channels like this.

@Mahdia AhseenThe lawyers did fail, yes, but they're first mistake in the courtroom was in going with a not-so-subtle misogynistic angle from the beginning. Attempting to use a woman to explain *how moms are supposed to treat their kids.*
But *of course* someone read my opinion the wrong way - it's expected on opinion-based, "you-be-the-judge" channels like this.

@ScoCon86 that's a weird way to phrase it all if you claim you're not misogynistic. You could've just said that <b>all</b> of the defense lawyers were dull, flat, uncharismatic, which they were. What does it have to do with the gender of the lawyer who does the opening statement? A bringing a woman for the opening statement wasn't the problem, the problem was their entire method of approach. All the lawyers failed.

@ScoCon86 that's a weird way to phrase it all if you claim you're not misogynistic. You could've just said that *all* of the defense lawyers were dull, flat, uncharismatic, which they were. What does it have to do with the gender of the lawyer who does the opening statement? A bringing a woman for the opening statement wasn't the problem, the problem was their entire method of approach. All the lawyers failed.

It's not the jury's fault - the defense had a better game plan. He had a better connection than the prosecution. The big problem I think was prosecution using a woman (no, this isn't misogynistic, put away the torches & pitchforks!) they thought "a woman's/mom's perspective" would add more gravity to their case, just by having a lady lawyer do the talking. But did you listen to her opening statements? Dull, flat, cold voice plus their arrogance and gullibility - prosecution failed miserably. Idiots.

Thanks for the tip. Will be highly interesting book to read. She is truly <i>unique</i> human being (unlike your average mindless citizens), in most fascinating way.

Thanks for the tip. Will be highly interesting book to read. She is truly _unique_ human being (unlike your average mindless citizens), in most fascinating way.

I pray that she never has another child again. And if she does...I'm scared for those poor innocent kids

I pray that she never has another child again. And if she does...I'm scared for those poor innocent kids


It really baffles me how even though everything points at Casey (the smell of corpse in her car, not reporting her supposedly missing child for a month, being too calm despite the fact that her child is missing, lying about almost every detail she'd given, and the weird internet searches about suffocating someone) and yet she was deemed as not guilty. This case really leaves an unsettling feeling in my chest, especially on the fact that she's living a free life after what had happened.

I have 10 minutes left and started reading the comments, I assumed she was going to be found guilty but to read that she is now free walking the streets is incredibly infuriating.

Casey is innocent.   There's no physical evidence that she did something with Kaylee, she's just a congenital liar.  Leave this poor woman alone she lost her child.

Does drowning in a pool not count as suffocation? If she wanted to hide her drowned child would that not make her car smell? What unsettling feeling? In both possibilities the same outcome happens with the same evidence. The only thing the defense had to do is pertain that, and they did so she walked. Don't blame the people, blame the system, but if the system was revised people would be blaming the exact opposite. After hundreds of years in this system, and thousands that shaped humanity, this is the answer we found. We need definitive proof. Its sad that all Casey had to do was wait enough time to cover up the suffocation due to lack of air, by stuffing her in a place where decomposition happens faster, so she could say it was suffocation due to water. It is plausible she was duct taped so Kaylee wouldn't leak up pool water while Casey was trying to transport the body to hide her death, but we know what it was. To save innocent people being locked up, we have to make sacrifices like this. There can't be any doubts, the easiest way to do it is with a confession but she smartened to it.

@Nichita Samuel I'm not sure if what I said went through, so I'll say it again, your argument against Ben Shapiro's position is a strawman because he never uses the lawyer argument in regards to crime rates, but in regards to conviction rates for the same crime, so yes what you said does sense to you because it's a strawman position and miss characterisation  of the argument, so it makes sense to you, but I nor him used that argument for crime rates but conviction rates, so it does make sense and is perfectly valid in that regard, as in the regard and situation it's was supposed to be used in, it feels awful to defend Ben shapiro because I myself am very left leaning, but you are incorrect here.

@Homunculus, first of all, she went away because they could not prove that she is guilty, because otherwise she would go to jail, about what you've been mentioned, if you are a black guy but there is a strong evidence that you are guilty, no one will help you even with a billion of dollars, but is you are not guilgy, than, you can make a case that sometimes you need someone to present yourself better than you do, BUT, this cases are VERY, VERY, VERY rare because you have to not be guilty (which is rare when you have acusations) than the police have to think that you are guilty (but there are profesionals and they are not stupid) which again it minimazes the equation, and then you have to not be abel to  afford to take a lawyer in USA but bear in mind that UsA is a very rich country, where you have credit cards, you can borrow money, you have family, friends.
So, in order to not be guilty and to go in jail, it happens but it is very, very, very rare, so, the question of Ben Shapiro stands up, why 13%of population(black people) are in charge of 50% of the criminal offence?
Because they have no money for lawyers??
It does not make any sense.
And, btw, there are a lot of countries in the world that they are not even close enough rich as Black people are from USA, what to say, that all those countries have people in jail because they have no money and they can't afford a good lawyer?
That is not a good hypothesis at all.

@Skrilla there's just no demonstrable bias that can't be accounted for that money or access to a lawyer doesn't account for.

@Homunculus so you’re saying biases doesn’t exist

@Sergio'S VeggieS I went to high school with Casey. I lived nearby.  We all knew everything about the case. The prosecution left a couple of holes that her defense attorney was able to fill with reasonable doubt. Even her looking up chloroform was argued away as Casey maybe wanting to make Caylee sleep. It didn't necessarily point to premeditated.

@Jennifer Wirth I don't know if you've looked into everything about this case. This video doesn't show just how much evidence there was. Read the wiki on the case, there is tremendous evidence. I guess the talented lawyer convinced the jury there wasn't proof beyond reasonable doubt, but the definition of what is reasonable doubt seems to not be understood. It was not reasonable, at all, to doubt she murdered her child, premeditated. I fully disagree with you.

@Sergio'S VeggieS for a pre-meditated murder charge? Yes there was enough doubt. They could have proved she did it,  but they couldn't exactly prove that she planned it out. They built a case out of the wrong charge

@Jennifer Wirth no, there was no reasonable doubt, get out of here.

I've been in a retired police vehicle and the smell of death of a person killed in their patrol car was still there, no matter how much they tried to sterilize it it was still there. It always made me uncomfortable whenever I rode in that vehicle and that was before the history of the car. You can literally smell that someone was killed in it

@Tori Barnes She was skating on thin ice. The police were stupid not to pick up on zanny the nanny when she told police who had been watching her kid. What she did will be remembered when it comes to interrogation techs next time. It was clear Oj killed his wife and he still got away with it. Casey had some of the same lawyers that helped oj go free.

Also, at the time of this happening, she didn't have a dime to her name. Which would say she paid her lawyer with sex. Read an article about a man going to interview her(she was staying with the lawyer who represented her)and as he approached he saw casey running out of the door naked. The article didn't really elaborate much more, but clearly sex was her money, or it seems.

She is proven a sociopath but she wasn't proven guilty. Even tho we all know she did it, evidence is required to convict someone of murder.

@Homunculus if Casey Anothony had a public defender she probably would have been charged and convicted of with capital murder.

@Liçá It has quite little to do with race, The difference between black and white conviction rates from trials can be accounted for by the fact that white people are more likely to afford a good lawyer. Of course there's reasons why this is and im not denying systemic racism affects black Americans because it does, If you think she got away simply because of her skin colour then you're likely wrong there, But if you are saying she got away because she's white and white people can generally afford better lawyers etc because of systemic issues you would be right, A lot of people seem to believe its simply because of skin colour though sadly, Which is incorrect.

@Jennifer Wirth spot on - most average folkes don’t understand the law

@Jennifer Wirth so she didn't go to the jail? where is her daughter's body tho

It's because the prosecution went for premeditated murder charges.  They just couldn't prove the case they were trying to make,  but they had plenty of evidence for lesser charges.  Unfortunately the jury did their jobs. For what the prosecution was charging,  there was reasonable doubt.

she's still reproducing too. our justice system absolutely fucking failed here. miserably failed.


She did an internet search for “suffocation”. Man how the hell do lawyers like that sleep at night.

It’s an honorable job. If you were accused of a crime I’ll bet you’d want a good lawyer too. Guilty or not

US lawyers are supposed to give the best defense they can, even if they themselves know its bullshit. Everyone has a right to a good defense, thought I can understand the frustration, especially with cases like these.

They know that people will see this case, see how obviously guilty casey was and that the lawyer still got her off. Which means people will flock to this vile ass man to be on their defence. 🤑💰💸

@James Lee that’s awfully optimistic of you

@James Lee that’s awfully optimistic of you

@Sharpe Everyone deserves the right to ask for a defence, but anyone who would be willing to defend a woman like this after looking at the evidence is pure evil.

@Zach We are not a society of angels, and we shouldn’t expect to live in one. Our justice system and monetary system aren’t perfect, but they do a lot of good. <br>I for one am grateful that verdicts like this are relatively rare and that we can reasonably expect it to serve as bedrock for future improvements.

@Zach We are not a society of angels, and we shouldn’t expect to live in one. Our justice system and monetary system aren’t perfect, but they do a lot of good.
I for one am grateful that verdicts like this are relatively rare and that we can reasonably expect it to serve as bedrock for future improvements.

@Ethan Goldrup "when you know they are guilty"

You don't, and that is exactly why there is a court system and if you could 100% prove they were guilty, then that person sould lose their case. It's that simple. We can assume she's guilty and while she probably is, there wasnt enough evidence to prove without a shadow of a doubt that she murdered her daughter

They did their jobs. Everybody deserves their day in court, with a attorney doing their best to defend them.

@Luc Gusmundson Because it was a high-profile capital-punishment case.
Her elite-lawyers very likely worked for free because they love these cases.
It’s their equivalent of being on American-Idol-Lawyers-Edition after which they get book-deals, speaking-engagements, high-level clients who pay full-price, etc.

And so their potentially 500-dollar-an-hour salaries were ‘written off’ for this one and the likely at least 500,000 dollar bill was on-the-house. No charge.

think about it this way, if she didn’t pay for
A lawyer a lawyer would be provided to her by the government itself, what happened is vile and horrible but the legal system
Believes in a fair trial for everyone which fucking bites when you know they’re guilty and the jury buys it that shit sucks to see.

@Daniel sanchezaldana The odds are in your favor but they get smaller every day . One day they will be 0 and there will be no more chances to accept refuge from Gods wrath.

@catladyJeez! Your answer is almost 100% disconnected from what I said

Try practicing some text interpretation: Read again your first comment in this comment section, then read my answer to that comment

First, I was talking about the lawyers, and not Casey. You said that the lawyers - and other people who make to the top of society's hierarchy - are psychopaths. I refuted that by saying they can only be sociopaths, because psycopaths would be killing people for no reason at all due to their insanity.

Second, you're stating that the difference between psychopaths and sociopaths is only about the origins of their behaviour, which is not true. There is also a big difference in the behaviour itself. The most recent video in this channel demonstrates how big that difference is: Psycopaths can commit the most horrendous crimes without having a reason and even without properly planning what to do after, because they are insane; Sociopaths will aways seek some benefit for themselves while committing crimes, which makes them rather sane people but also complete narcissists.

@Daniel sanchezaldana could be today for you, who knows

@Zach how much longer? been a couple thousand years.

@S Critoph it won’t be too long until God will judge each and every person face to face

I think a pillow stuffed with money help a lot XD

You have to provide the best defence  you can otherwise the system doesn't work and justice is not merely difficult but impossible.<br> Think of them like a guy who deals with sewage blockages or caring for the mentally ill.

You have to provide the best defence  you can otherwise the system doesn't work and justice is not merely difficult but impossible.
 Think of them like a guy who deals with sewage blockages or caring for the mentally ill.

@Zach should we instead return to the good old times when people had no legal defense and were stoned because "God" told the judge they were guilty?

@catlady Not psycopaths, they're sociopaths

If we had a lot of psycopaths on the top of society's hierarchy, just a few of us would still be alive: They would be killing people for no reason at all; Not for for profit or for whatever other benefit, just for no reason.

@thatminer the fact that it pays his bills doesn’t make it less scummy. Selling fentanyl to jr high students is a job too, it’s just a slightly more noble one

The defense lawyer Baez stated that the dad wanted to kill himself after learning of Caylee's death

@Safiyyah Lyle This can actually happen. I had the same thoughts. I was also thinking about the amount of years I would spend just reading. Nah.

They sold their souls, so they sleep, but have nightmares.

She was screwing her lawyer. He knew she was guilty.

lol I wanted to be a lawyer when I was younger and that changed after I did more research plus I’d be scared if I put someone in jail and they come for me 😭🤚

@Luc Gusmundson there was quite a lot of speculation that anthony and her lawyer were having a sexual relationship

Lawyers perform a necessary job.  They must hate the jury, though.

@Luc Gusmundson sometimes lawyers take up cases for publicity than money; this was a heavily publicized case. Even if he posted his billboard on every corner of city, it wouldn’t give him the same publicity

how did Casey afford this guy? she clearly wasn’t rolling in it

Everybody deserves a defense, even Casey Anthony. The Jury should’ve not fallen for the defense though. The evidence spoke for itself.

I’m thinking the same thing about the jury.

I’m thinking the same thing about the jury.

@Yeahtoasty that wouldn’t be very comfortable though. Also not a very efficient way to store money.

with a pillowcase filled to the brim with money.


this lady makes me sick, rip little angel caylee


The jury should be ashamed of themselves.

@Lizy Blueeyes If you know, then how can you say that it's not beyond reasonable doubt... The fact she lied and didn't call the police for a month and clearly didn't care is enough to charge her. At least for neglegance for fucks sake. Not telling anyone for a month is the primer example of it. She was not charged just because she's a woman.

@Heart shaped Box They were 11-1 not guilty for manslaughter and he literally said fine whatever you guys want and changed his vote

@Dixi E Normous I don't think anyone thinks she's innocent, I certainly don't, however unfortunately the jury couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was guilty. Hopefully one day she'll pay for what she did but we can't blame the jury for doing their job with the evidence they were given.

@Julian aye thanks stranger. But I'm not into old guys, sorry.

@Joe you can't even explain. Why comment? Bye.

The Jury's role is not to say if they think she is guilty or not, it's to say if the evidences and proofs are beyond any reasonable doubt... And saddly the lawyers were able to throw a veil of doubt on her guilt.<br>The jury did their job. Her lawyers did a very questionnable move and it worked...

The Jury's role is not to say if they think she is guilty or not, it's to say if the evidences and proofs are beyond any reasonable doubt... And saddly the lawyers were able to throw a veil of doubt on her guilt.
The jury did their job. Her lawyers did a very questionnable move and it worked...

@Purple Heart FYI. In the court JUDGES and jury who convict, not State's authorities. All judges and prosecutors are INDOCTRINATED in Liberal/Socialist Universities.

@adrian quintanar they could have used jury nullification...

Honestly I don’t think I can blame the jury too much. So much information that we know now proves her guilty, wasn’t shown in court.

It’s like the OJ trial, it’s easy to play armchair juror after the fact, but they can only go off of what they’re presented in court.

@Chad Thundercock cope, the courts disagree, what he did years prior had nothing to do with his death

@Dixi E Normous none of us believe she was innocent get that through your head

@SS The evidence is all of her lies compiled together to show her obvious guilt, her not reporting her missing, etc...they should have sought a confession too but how did they not find any physical evidence though? Did they search her car?

@TGM-_- do you have anything to add? Nah. K.

@Dixi E Normous the dude never said she was innocent bru

@Dixi E Normous I don't think saying not guilty means innocence. It simply means that there isn't enough evidence to prove guilty. Searching on google is not evidence of murder, nor is a rotting smell in the car.

@Ukraino TV Sean hannity supported Casey lol

@Famous. phia no a Juror referring to the op comment

@dustyak79 no lol I meant like who is “he” you referred to someone as “he” (he regrets...) I’m trying to figure who the “he” is. Is it the attorney that defended Casey?

@Famous. phia I didn’t look after watching the video I looked up what the killer was doing now and an article popped up I skimmed through it

@Joe I know. I want to know why they believe she is innocent just like you believe so.

Many evidence that she does not care. The motive is she wanted to live a party life and would rather show her parents that her child was kidnapped so they would still love her. She was scared of her parents more than the consequences of a dead child. The defender only brought up molestation to emotionally control the jury. Looks like that lawyer can deceive even you.

@Dixi E Normous that’s not at all what they said, all they said is that it’s not the juries duty to decide what’s bullshit or not, it’s to see whether the evidence presented can prove beyond a reasonable doubt guilt, which they said multiple jurors have said they believed otherwise

@Nagassh tell me your theory then since you still believe she is innocent despite the hour and 40 minute video showing how heartless and cold blooded this "mother" Is. I would really hope someone would report you missing after an hour and not months when your body is decomposed. But I guess that would be alright with you.

@Dixi E Normous Congratulations, so could the jury. Unfortunately they're not there to decide if the lawyer or even the defendant is full of shit. Every single one who's spoken about this case says they think she was probably guilty but the evidence wasn't there. People don't (or at least shouldn't) get sentenced to life or potentially the death penalty because people are "pretty sure" they did it.<br>Better the guilty walk free than the innocent hang, as sickening as cases like this are.

@Dixi E Normous Congratulations, so could the jury. Unfortunately they're not there to decide if the lawyer or even the defendant is full of shit. Every single one who's spoken about this case says they think she was probably guilty but the evidence wasn't there. People don't (or at least shouldn't) get sentenced to life or potentially the death penalty because people are "pretty sure" they did it.
Better the guilty walk free than the innocent hang, as sickening as cases like this are.

@Luke Cloudstrider I could see through all of the bullshit that was happening. They really need to IQ test the jury. Casey was full of it and so was the lawyer. I could tell he was talking down to the jury as well. I can't believe people can't see.

Tbf though, her lawyer was kinda the best lawyer ever so...

The prosecution didn’t have enough physical evidence to convince the jury. I guarantee you nearly every one of them know in their hearts that Casey did it. But that’s not their job, their job is to decide the evidence disproves all possible scenarios except murder, which it didn’t unfortunately.

One recently came out and he says it still haunts him that he didn't take a stand

i completely agree who in their right mind would fall for their lies


I hate that during her talk with her parents
Her dad said “I wish I could’ve been a better father and grandfather”
And Casey said “don't think that for a second Kailey HAS BEEN so lucky” and then she corrects herself and said “Kailey IS so lucky”
Sick

I hate that during her talk with her parents
Her dad said “I wish I could’ve been a better father and grandfather”
And Casey said “don't think that for a second Kailey *HAS BEEN* so lucky” and then she corrects herself and said “Kailey *IS* so lucky”
Sick

Has been is a present tense verb. There is no past tense in that phrase or than a continuing action from the last. Learn to grammar

@Funtcase tuckfard nah, I'm a financial advisor. We all know she's guilty; but that statement is not necessarily the smoking gun that Emma thinks it is.

@Ryan Owens regardless if it's final past or not ( semantics) we both know she's guilty from your profile pic you appear to be a lawyer I presume not a very good one go figure

Thread-top content is at  around  29:38, I believe.

"Has been" is not a final past tense. Has been is a continuous past tense.

And she only corrected herself bc her mom covered her mouth

I noticed the exact same thing! So strange that while the search was still going on, Casey subconsciously talked about her daughter in the past tense...

@Sri Sruthi yes, but it does make sense in this context. <br>That's not an argument.

@Sri Sruthi yes, but it does make sense in this context.
That's not an argument.

@Vinny Mac  First she said "had been", and then changed to "has been"

That could also mean up to this point, not necessarily including the present moment.

I was lookin for this observation since he didn't mention  it.


Defense: There's no evidence to prove that Casey killed Caylee.<br>Also Defense: There's no evidence to prove that George sexually assaulted Caylee, but we want you to believe that this is the ONE time that Casey isn't lying through her teeth.

Defense: There's no evidence to prove that Casey killed Caylee.
Also Defense: There's no evidence to prove that George sexually assaulted Caylee, but we want you to believe that this is the ONE time that Casey isn't lying through her teeth.

@Travis C It isn't a lie if the client says it isn't. Lawyers' hands are tied because they can be disbarred if they do anything to intentionally hurt their client's case. If the lawyer was the one to come up the story then it would be a violation of ethics, but there is no way to prove or disprove that. The father could have taken a polygraph but those are not admissible as evidence, and you cannot force someone to take one.

@StudleyDuderight They do have to defend their client but they also have ethical guidelines to follow. A flimsy child abuse story is riding that line pretty close. Defense lawyers are not allowed to knowingly lie in their client's defense.

Bro that guy has supremely greed for money.or Casey makes his weenie hut jr wet

Horrible case but her lying is hilarious.

The defense's job is to defend their client. They are not allowed to do anything but defend their clients. If they had thrown this case and it came out later then they would lose their license. Justice was not served, but the system worked as the Founding Fathers intended. The state failed to prove guilt to the jury.

@Henry Benson lawyers enforce the law, not justice. Law exists to settle, let's just say, "disagreements". whatever that might be.

@SUBST4NCE To quote Cool Hand Luke, "callin' it your job don't make it right, boss."

@Theo Thats a poor fkin excuse, people with morals don't care when you say "I was just doing my job"

And justice for all my ass, can't even bring proper justice on someone who lied about her missing daughter whereabouts, and death...<br>Truly sickens me.

And justice for all my ass, can't even bring proper justice on someone who lied about her missing daughter whereabouts, and death...
Truly sickens me.

@DTHRocket i do think we should believe women..but her and jodi make it REALLY fucking hard too which sucks...

I now understand why people make jokes about lawyers being heartless.

They Told Me I Could Become Anything, So I became an Eggplant

@alt13 It was their job. Disgusting, but they were doing their job.

Yes, you are right. But, no prove means not guilty. Easy. Where is your problem?

Technically the judge did tell them they can’t use that as evidence for the defense’s story

Exactly. I cant believe they were able to throw that shit out there with no proof.

it's disgusting the lengths some lawyers will  go to in these situations


The fact that she is walking free and trying to release a book, and a movie, and dating the private investigator that worked on her case just... blows my mind. I'm speechless, what a psychopath! <br>Enough internet for today.

The fact that she is walking free and trying to release a book, and a movie, and dating the private investigator that worked on her case just... blows my mind. I'm speechless, what a psychopath!
Enough internet for today.

That’s a straight up superpower how’d she pull that off

now why the fuck would the PI that worked her case do that- 💀 also a book AND a movie?!?!?! i hope nobody picks it up because thats so fucking fucked if they do

She is beautiful. Most men would have a go if they had a chance. They will never have a chance so they talk bad about her. <br>She is a liar. Yes. Nobody knows if she is a murderer (Ok, she knows it and the real murderer, IF there is one, so 1-2 persons).

She is beautiful. Most men would have a go if they had a chance. They will never have a chance so they talk bad about her.
She is a liar. Yes. Nobody knows if she is a murderer (Ok, she knows it and the real murderer, IF there is one, so 1-2 persons).

@moodied 🤕🤕 this world is evil and manipulating

what the fr- ACTUALLY??!?!? I saw she was doing a movie but like... WHO AND WHY WOULD THEY JUST LET HER DO THIS STUFF?? SHE STRAIGHT UP MURDERED A CHILD. HER CHILD.

@Dom you are a fool for even thinking so

@Dom its not a matter of being a danger or not (which I personally think she is anyways). Its the fact that actions deserve consequences, no one should walk free after doing what she did

@Dom I’m obviously not as smart as you, would you mind explaining for me?

She was never a danger to society, and still isn't. Even if she had another kid with this investigator, I don't think she'd be a threat. While what she did is not excusable, I also don't think rotting in a jail cell using up tax dollars is ideal. There's been plenty of way worse criminals who get a second chance.

@Harshvardhan Kanthode Sometimes sociopaths are attracted to sociopaths. Even if they have a child on purpose, that child will be just a thing/accessory for them. There will be no love, attachment.

What the hell is the private investigator thinking? If they have another kid does he think it'll be safe?


Who is the REAL Casey Anthony??? Does any body know? Is there any video or audio recordings that exist, showing the real person inside? Does her journal contain evidence of her real personality? Does SHE EVEN KNOW WHO SHE REALLY IS? Maybe she spent so many years hiding her sickness, that she forgot who she really is, the partying leads me to believe she spent a lot of time numbing her true feelings, and trying to escape her mediocre suburban existence...? Thats IMHO of course, but I'm very interested in the girl behind the mask, and why she couldn't face her real feelings? Did she have no outlet for her pain? She certainly wouldn't be alone in those feelings. Was it pure un-adulterated SELFISHNESS? That is an ugly thing to show people, I can only imagine a girl in her social circles of suburban conformity wouldn't find to many people who could relate, or who WANT to relate. And all this would be theoretical, and interesting, and basically okay IF...she hadn't either killed or neglected or ignored the fact that her innocent child is gone, wrapped in a Winnie the Pooh blanket at the bottom of a swamp with pieces of duct tape around her mouth and nose... And accuse your own father of molesting you... wow, unbelievable selfishness and cold, icy cold heart of darkness.


Friend: obviously crying “if anything happens to that baby I’ll die!”
Casey: “ugh! Calling you guys is a huge waste of time!”
BITCH, WHAT!?!

Friend: *obviously crying* “if anything happens to that baby I’ll die!”
Casey: “ugh! Calling you guys is a huge waste of time!”
BITCH, WHAT!?!

@manchesterblue2007 that’s why I made peace with the verdict.

@Susanne Collins well thats exactly what im referring to...if it was a death penalty case or not, the evidence and arguments for and against the defence should be looked at dispassionately as far as is humanly possible... a lot of people are raising pitchforks.... I have no issue with that after all the evidence is considered in a proper manner and someone is found to be guilty

in most countries justice is considered to be blind

@manchesterblue2007 I think if it wasn’t a death penalty case things might be different. At least some members of the jury said that iirc.

@Sam Roberts her brother was super pissed when Casey, then their parents ( Casey lied to them about that to until she was, I think 7 months) didn’t tell him Casey was pregnant until she was few weeks from delivering

It’s because she’s irritated that people are caring about her missing daughter and not her being in jail. She doesn’t even acknowledge her daughters pain, a totally innocent soul and her own damn daughter. She’s disgusting, and now that she got away it fuels more of her belief of being able to lie about everything and get away with it. They did a great job. /s

that’s what broke me, your FRIEND cares more about your missing daughter than you

She said ugh and reacted that way because she was disgusted by the display of empathy

@David HHL Does "beyond a reasonable doubt" sound familiar?🤦♀

Even I got goosebumps when she said that cold bloodedly

She should be in jail, this jury is a joke

Even if she didn't kill her(which I 100% she did) that pute contempt and selfishness is very very telling to her priorities.

Makes sense idk why u guys are attacking :P

@David HHL that's it in a nutshell.... like it or not that's what the jury system offers... While I can understand the emotional outrage and subsequent responses on here, the system has worked exactly how it was designed to. I'll ask anyone on here if they were in a similar situation where the system was somehow against them and did not follow the rule of law or procedure, would you be ok with overlooking any mistakes that led you to go to jail?

I think not

The burden of proof is with the prosecution. Simple as that NOT GUILTY says the JURY WHY cos we saw no proof !!!

@Crystal Franklin seriously. i blame this partly on the parents for letting these behaviors slide

@Crystal Franklin i know right. Fake graduation party?🤦♀

@Gage Oconnor I mean, I 100% think that she was guilty. But that quote doesn't necessarily prove that she is. I think it DOES show that she doesn't care even the slightest about her daughter's wellbeing, or even her family and friends' peace of mind. But I think she would respond that way whether she killed Caylee, or if someone else killed Caylee and she just didn't give a shit.

But yeah, that line was as cold and heartless as can be, and if I were in their position, I'd suspect her too. Judging from their questions then, and later when her parents were talking to her in the jail, I think they did.

At that point if I were her friend or brother I would have immediately known she had something to do with it


she killed her child, framed a person that doesn't exist, lied that her friend knows the babysitter that DOESN'T EXIST, lied where she worked, got away with murder and the thing that stuck with me is her saying "i look like hell"

she is so self centered

Karad Jans really? Biologically most would have the motherly instinct to protect their kids, not to mention common sense

Don’t forget the lawyer said her dad raped her as an 8 year old when she was talking about how much she loved him previously.

@Nay DD jackie chiles is one hell of a lawyer, helped Kramer many times 😆😆😆😆

@034bloodas it wouldn't have been smart to blame it on a black person because they would have never stopped looking for evidence if they thought that a black person murdered an innocent young white girl

Framing a person that doesn't exist is at least more empathetic than someone that does exist

Where is Casey Anthony now. January 1st 2021 Casey Anthony has filed documents to start a private investigation firm, according to Florida state records. The address listed for the company belongs to Patrick McKenna, according to Palm Beach County property records.

McKenna was the lead investigator on Anthony’s defense team during her 2011 trial.

In a 2017 interview, Anthony told The Associated Press that she had been working for McKenna doing online social media searches and other investigative work. McKenna was also the lead investigator for O.J. Simpson, when he was accused of killing his wife and acquitted

And accused her father of being a child molester.

@Absolute DORUIYAAA 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 bruh. I look white myself.... ok sir.

@Shahnie What a joke...

Do elaborate how this is white privilege, please? And if race plays a part, would her gender play a part too? I'm not being racist or sexist here. But I'm genuinly intrigued why you think race is the primary reason why she got away.

well only reason why SHE  got  away with it ar <b>SHE</b> and not HE

well only reason why SHE  got  away with it ar *SHE* and not HE

@PREDATOREUS FILMS LOL Casey is a crazy person. Race is not all I think of love, just one of the many flawed facts of this case that allowed her to walk free.

Sorry but I think race and color haven't got much  to do with this case she is just a cold calculated and manipulative murderer. As they said a true psychopath that feels little empathy but for there own self preservation.

Idk how after first saying the babysitter was mixed then following up with black and whatever she thought of next prompted by the previous suggestion she still kept up the lie it IS SO OBVIOUS she’s just saying what she THINKS THEY WANT TO HEAR.  RACIST MUCH.

@Shahnie //That white privilege is so obvious.//  What does race have to do with this?  Is feeling entitled and being self-centered a trait of one race, or of human nature itself?  Do you really think there have been no mothers lacking empathy who have killed their children from any other race?  This is quite a prejudiced comment itself.

@melvin banks You're misinterpreting what I'm saying, I'm not referring to Casey Anthony, who was obviously guilty.

@The Fear Within so all her lies aren't evidence? Idk if your a parent but I am an if my child got kidnapped aint no way in hell I'm not calling the police. This ain't "Taken"

@Shahnie None of you people provide any amount of evidence other than claiming "it's facts", all you can do is parrot what others say and come to outlandish means.

@The Fear Within LOL buzzwords. It’s facts. Happy 2021. Disengaging 👍🏽😂

She said I look like hell right after her Dad said Hey Gorgeous

Haha ya xany the nany lol Xanax the nanny .. duh

@Steve Eisenhower Eisenhower lol OJ had white representation, money + power at dispose. Not even on the same playing field darlz.

cause she's white and lives in Florida lol

@Virgilio OJ had luck. Not black privilege... :/

@Shahnie what  "white privileges" have to do about this?

@034bloodas  well, technically she said the babysitter was mix of black and puerto rican. Doesn't it count as black?


Also a strand of her daughter’s hair was found in the trunk of the car and through DNA testing, it was concluded the hair had fallen off of the scalp post-mortem. How the hell she didn’t get convicted with this is absolutely beyond me.

Jury's are very easy to manipulate and that's what this woman and her lawyer were all too good at.


They couldn't even find her guilty for child neglect, piss poor mindless jury.

@James Eden Yea its easy to forget that 70% of everyone in a courtroom is a politician trying to get reelected :(

@Marie Chambe the prosecution did not even make the case for neglect. They only brought evidence for murder. You can't convict for a case they never attempted to make, even if the charge is there

@Nebula the jury also when interviewed said they thought she was guilty, but it needs to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, so even 99% certainty is not enough to convict

@Charity Dunning that is true, but your experience and education should mostly stay out of jury deliberation and the trial should be approached tabula Rasa

Charity Dunning “ they was” lmao don’t worry you’ll be chosen soon girl 😂

Ghetto Soup sadly because of the nature of google searches it’s technically circumstantial evidence so even though it’s obvious why she was searching those terms, it doesn’t show the intent behind the searches only that she was searching.<br>  It’s kinda ridiculous but there are very rare cases where people are just coincidentally searching shit like that so they have to take it with a grain of salt

Ghetto Soup sadly because of the nature of google searches it’s technically circumstantial evidence so even though it’s obvious why she was searching those terms, it doesn’t show the intent behind the searches only that she was searching.
  It’s kinda ridiculous but there are very rare cases where people are just coincidentally searching shit like that so they have to take it with a grain of salt

@abcd That is not how the law works. The jury won't convict because "well, we could, if we want!" Grow up.

K M Weekes Everyone in jury has a choice, and they could have said guilty there was nothing stopping them but themselves.

SimpSity What the hell are you talking about?! So what if random peeps THINK she is guilty. The jury doesn’t have that luxury. In a court of law, jury looks at evidence presented and ONLY evidence presented. The Prosecution did NOT prove her guilt without a reasonable doubt.

The prosecution’s evidence didn’t prove her guilty of first degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt. They didn’t even have cause of death & time of death. It’s not about thinking she’s guilty it’s about the evidence proving she is.

Charity Dunning Thanks for the comedy relief, this video was getting pretty dark.

They choose jury members based on that. They don't want experienced or educated people. They was people who are easy to manipulate. That's one reason I've never been picked for jury duty.

They couldn’t find her guilty if they had live footage of her carrying the body to chuck-E-Cheese for a birthday party.


The stupidity of the jury is astounding.

The stupidity of the jury is astounding.

@Justin Baker That is why it is so important to have a private attorney who would work for you and is good at what he is doing because 97% of the defendant would take the plea deals even many who are innocent got scared and took the plea; because the prosecutors' case most of the time have loopholes that bright attorney would be able to defend their clients.  It is not the attorney's job to cast judgment on whether you are guilty or not the only job is to defend the defendant as best as he could and he did a great job.

I read this comment 6 minutes into the video ; I'm pissed

I read this comment 6 minutes into the video ; I'm pissed

@some guy Bullshit! The lawyer does not have to defend her, he could have just told her that he was uncomfortable taking the case on. I had a lawyer myself do that in my dui case (mind you nobody was harmed, and I have been clean of opiates for over 10 years). If you go to different defense attorneys you and the lawyer should both want to choose each other. And any client, or lawyer can decide to choose different options.

For real they really fd this one up. No one lie that much if they are innocent. Use your head.

The stupidity of the prosecutor trumps the jury's idiocy by far.

I read somewhere long ago that a few of the jurors did not even have GED’s at the time. It’s like, where do we draw the line about who is gonna help with the outcome of the decisions? Saddest shit ever.

If I was the jury I would’ve said GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY

Casey definitely did it in my opinion, but don't blame the jury and especially not the lawyers. They all did their job. What's done is done

@Lola DewClaw Agreed. He was a mind F master! She totally did it. Awful turn of events…

@Wizard I can guarantee you this guy is really fucking expensive now.  Might just well be the best defense lawyer in the US.

Beyond any reasonable doubt, not suspicious.

Beyond any reasonable doubt, not suspicious.

@Antonio Leo Your criminl system work alright. Work in stupid ways

@Wizard exactly it’s his job to lessen a sentence or get rid of a sentence all together so u can lie but u would have to be good at it’s all lawyers do this not just this single man

The concept of a fair trial is at the core of any functioning justice system. The jury did a good job because they remained impartial. Prosecution and police on the other hand did not, as they rushed into the trial with too much confidence, assuming that they actually had the opportunity to do better.

@Justin Bakeryou would have had a fair argument had you not started with an insult. no one here is stupid at all. even the jurors regretted their decisions and know they got played. the defense was weak. sure they don’t have to prove her innocence but what baez did was a big theatrical waste of time.

The prosecution did make a mistake. They shouldn't have required for the death penalty with only circumstancial evidences. Of course the jury felt guilty at the idea of sentencing a potentially innocent (read: I DO NOT believe AT ALL that she's innocent, but yknow "innocent until proven guilty" and the prosecution's job is supposedly to prove without a reasonable doubt that she's guilty, which they failed at) young, pretty, 20 something young woman, to death (and yes I can acknowledge that in the case of Casey Anthony, being an attractive woman is a privilege in these circumstances: had she been a man, she would have been convicted). She would have gotten life in prison if the prosecution had gone for that, but noooooo, of course they went around and chased for the death penalty even tho they had white shark Baez in front of them, and so little forensic evidence, and a murderer who felt no shame or remorse for what she did (not to mention, her stupid mother lying for her).
Of course the whole defense strategy was dirty asf ; it's baffling to imagine that any jury would believe anything Baez would pull out of his @ss every two days to bounce back up. It's horrid to imagine a daughter like Casey, accusing her father of molesting her when it's so clearly untrue and just a stupid strategy to make herself look like the victim. But yeah, there was nothing to convict her to death on that. Baez is dirty through and through, since the trial, it's been put out there that Casey was paying him with sexual services, and that he knew months prior where Caylee's body was because Casey had told him, but he didn't report it to the authorities to save Casey's sorry excuse for a human's @ss.
One thing I'll never understand tho, is how she was acquitted of all charges when there def was some child neglect in the fact that she hadn't reported her child being missing for 31 days. On that, we can claim that the jurors were stupid.

The prosecution did make a mistake. They shouldn't have required for the death penalty with only circumstancial evidences. Of course the jury felt guilty at the idea of sentencing a potentially innocent (read: I DO NOT believe AT ALL that she's innocent, but yknow "innocent until proven guilty" and the prosecution's job is supposedly to prove *without a reasonable doubt* that she's guilty, which they failed at) young, pretty, 20 something young woman, *to death* (and yes I can acknowledge that in the case of Casey Anthony, being an attractive woman is a privilege in these circumstances: had she been a man, she would have been convicted). She would have gotten life in prison if the prosecution had gone for that, but noooooo, of course they went around and chased for the death penalty even tho they had white shark Baez in front of them, and so little forensic evidence, *and* a murderer who felt no shame or remorse for what she did (not to mention, her stupid mother lying for her).
Of course the whole defense strategy was *dirty asf* ; it's baffling to imagine that any jury would believe anything Baez would pull out of his @ss every two days to bounce back up. It's horrid to imagine a daughter like Casey, accusing her father of molesting her when it's so clearly untrue and just a stupid strategy to make herself look like the victim. But yeah, there was nothing to convict her *to death* on that. Baez is dirty through and through, since the trial, it's been put out there that Casey was paying him with sexual services, *and* that he knew months prior where Caylee's body was because Casey had told him, but he didn't report it to the authorities to save Casey's sorry excuse for a human's @ss.
One thing I'll never understand tho, is how she was acquitted of *all charges* when there def was some child neglect in the fact that she hadn't reported her child being missing for 31 days. On that, we can claim that the jurors were stupid.

@Justin Baker if the verdict was correct, then why are jury members feeling guilty? Something went wrong obviously.

@Justin Baker that would be a good point if there was any plausible doubt. There was no doubt of her guilt. None. People have been rightfully convicted on less. Most people are convicted on circumstantial evidence.

@Justin Baker yeah...and OJ''s not guilty

@Justin Baker yeah...and OJ''s not guilty

@Justin Baker aestheterita said "I read a statement that said that 10 years later some of the jurors came forward and said they felt guilty about not convicting her." Also the jury literally threw. If you really think there is a chance she is not guilty then I don't know what to say.

The dude just was amazing at his job and the jury weren't.

@Lola DewClaw Yeah I agree except the dude is paid to do that and he kinda has to defend her. He's just good at his job. You can't blame it on him, it was the jury throwing

I watched every available juror interview and not ONE of them struck me as even remotely competent or intelligent. It was immediately made clear to me how they could ignore so much evidence and fall for Casey's lies and her defense team's manipulation. People like to say "the prosecution failed Caylee" but after seeing the interviews I'm now of the belief that it never actually mattered how well the prosecution presented their case, because the IDIOTS on the jury would've found a way to write it all off as "just speculation". As one youtube comment joked, Casey could've written "Today I killed my daughter" in her diary and the jury still would've said "This could mean anything really". Yes, they are THAT stupid!

@David B ive seen convictions with less.

@David B ive seen convictions with less.

@Totallynotkyubey it's one thing to be uncharismatic during a trial. It's quite the difference from showing ZERO CONCERN that her child is "missing". As in the video they showed of her shopping for a movie with her boyfriend at Blockbuster during the time her daughter was supposedly missing. But of course she wasn't concerned... she already knew she was dead because she killed her. You need not have to go on emotion to have seen that this woman is guilty. The evidence was all there. Prosecution just sucks. I hope they all lost their jobs. Not to mention the jury was a bunch of single-cell organisms.

@Rachel Tydlacka there's a lot of people who are fanboys and are in love with a child murderer. According to what I've read, the jury was afraid to find her guilty, even though they believed she was guilty.

It's not the justice system here, the jury just was weak.

@El hurricane looks that way. Pathetic that he has to crush on a child murderer.

@aestheterita and as mean as this sounds, I hope they do feel guilty every day of the rest of their lives. Because of their stupidity that child's murder will not be vindicated. She will get no justice. Poor innocent baby. I hope Casey Anthony has the most miserable existence for the rest of her days, then goes on to the fieriest pit of Hell.

@Justin Baker definitely weren't taught that at school in the UK.

@Justin Baker The whole jury system is stupid and obsolete. Theatrics and acting should not be what decides on whether justice will be served. How many uncharismatic innocent people were convicted in bogus cases? How many well-spoken psychopaths were let free based on their rhetoric?

@El hurricane he literally just explained how a criminal trial works and what the prosecution did wrong in the trial. How exactly is he a fanboy of a child murderer?

its not a question of jury stupidity. They need a body or an admission of guilt to convict; the evidence isn't strong enough to establish that she did it i guess

Thats is the US broken justice system sadly.

Thats is the US broken justice system sadly.

Well all the smart people are smart enough to get out of jury duty. <br>Hopefully you'll reconsider going next time you get the postcard.

Well all the smart people are smart enough to get out of jury duty.
Hopefully you'll reconsider going next time you get the postcard.

@Justin Baker ah, found the Casey Anthony fanboy.

@Justin Baker ah, found the Casey Anthony fanboy.

@Justin Baker You're completely missing the point

@Justin Baker You're completely missing the point

@Zer0 Actually it's not the job of the defense attorney to lie to the court. He knows damn well what happened. It's his job to lessen the sentence, not to lie.

@Lola DewClaw ur def right but it’s his job and he’s really good at it

@ItsAlwaysRusty He is a demon. A gaslighting demon. He played to their egos, and checkmated them making them look like they were choosing the illogical route if they chose her to be guilty. Casey should be rotting in prison and the Jury is responsible for falling for the demon's court room magic tricks and mindfuckery. Awful.

@aestheterita The jury simply fell for Mr Baez's stick. Don't let anger or emotion sway your opinion. Base it on facts. "Like my completely unsubstantiated / unproved statement that Casey's Dad molested her."


I loved that bit when the alleged male coworker takes the stand and straight up shot down her lies. "Nah fam, we never worked together, and i've never lived out of this state" 😂

@here7ic lmao right. This chick is absolutely insane.

He didn't even have kids. Her whole story is predicated on this dude having kids needing a nanny 👁👄👁


That defense opening statement is absolutely fucked


Detective: "how do you know this person"

Casey: "we met in 2004 in the Himalayas, his social security number is 000-00-0000, he's lived in Orlando for the last 5 years, but lived in Chicago growing up, attended Northwest, has a degree in early childhood psychology, is a member of the greater Chicagoland Ragtime Preservation Society, collects rare stamps, and consults with the National Archives as a contract advisor every other month.

Detective: "Do you have his phone number?"

Casey: "No"

Oh boy.... John! This made me laugh sooooooo hard from "Himalayas" through "No" until forever.... thanks very much, mate! 😂😂😂

Detective: ....and how did you meet John Talmage?

Casey: He will leave a comment on a YouTube documentary type video of how I can make up the most in depth lies on someones backstory and how they are lifelong friends yet I dont have their numbers or any means to remain in contact with them.

Detective:.....tha....that's incredible, how in the hell did I never put those things together lik....wait.. it hasnt happened yet?

Casey: no, it happens when a man with dementia runs the country

Detective: shits on table

Detective: ....and how did you meet John Talmage?

Casey: He will leave a comment on a YouTube documentary type video of how I can make up the most in depth lies on someones backstory and how they are lifelong friends yet I dont have their numbers or any means to remain in contact with them.

Detective:.....tha....that's incredible, how in the hell did I never put those things together lik....wait.. it hasnt happened yet?

Casey: no, it happens when a man with dementia runs the country

Detective: *shits on table*

damn why did you give away my social security number for?! i'm going to sue you

I am very good at lying 🤥 but now I will never try to lie. It's very very bad thing to do and I don't know why but I am afraid

@jai singh rofl exactly what the jury said

Casey: I don't have it on me but I wrote it down in my journal that survive the Hiroshima bombing of ww2 after being returned from Mars by alien life outside our planet. Alien life that I also met in the Himalayas who likes grilled chicken. But no, I don't have the number.

You forgot the multiple uh-huhs during each of the detective's questions


She’s so scary. There are people out there exactly like her walking around just waiting to lose it.

This was me at one point, but not to this crappy extent. It's a good thing I know now so I can grow up from these tendencies. I was a bit of a narcissist as well

It's like the movie "unbreakable". He doesn't realise he has powers until he's put into all those situations. There are many scary psychopaths like Casey who haven't been tested yet and live among us.

You ain't lyin. There are numbers of folks with similar psychopathologies, but have not experienced the type of setting or situation to trigger their psychopathic or sociopathic tendencies into action. It's a selfishness or blunt presentation of emotion that most of us are unable to understand.

Just joining the chorus here. I know TWO people just like her. Pathological liars and narcissists. They do their best to destroy every person they touch, and sometimes succeed.

Don't try to fix people like this. IMO you can't. Even if possible the cost to you would be WAY too high. Just disappear from their lives. Be uninteresting and give them nothing. It's the best way to protect yourself.

She’s not scary, she’s a coward and child herself. The parents failed to get the lying in check along time ago and not saying it’s 100% the parents fault but everyone is at fault here in the family. Casey murdered that child, I’ve said it since day 1 of hearing this case and still believe it. People like that are only scary to people that are smaller than them and people they know will take the abuse.

My ex girflfriend was just the same sociopath and pathological liar just like her. They even have the same expression on their face, same methods and everything...

some of them actually never lose it either, they just "function" as sociopaths for their entire life.

My aunt is like her, she's a drug addict and she had kids until her body was too diseased to hold anything in her uterus. I feel so horrible for my cousins... They have so much trauma from her that they'll have to recover from

my ex used to lie just like this, its fucking scary. Made up stories, events, using people in a lie that don't exist or don't have anything to do with it. Detailed lies off the tongue. I swear I was so scared to find out she was lying.

There's more narcissists out there than we could imagine man.. it's fucking scary. I've been taken advantage myself of one. Thought she loved me but she was using me.

I know someone that has the exact same tendencies and personality as her. I pray to God that they never have kids.


“Xanny the nanny” was rumored to be a cruel joke about Xanax she gave caylee so she wouldn’t wake up on nights out.

Yes, i agree with you. I believe she was high when she killed  her daughter

@Tiara TheAwesome Because it made her important for a few months until the attention went away, thats my guess.

Didn't they find any drugs in caylee's body.. i did not hear anything about the autopsy

@John Smith She was milking her parents for money and they would’ve asked questions about where she was going, how long she would be gone, and then she’d have to see them after driving drunk and high etc.. She would have to be accountable and actually take the time to call, make arrangements for them to watch Caylee and then drop her off and pick her up. They’d be asking questions about her daughter’s care like, whether or when she’d been fed or what time she slept. Children need schedules and consistency. Casee wanted to duck responsibility. She didn’t want anyone questioning her.

@Hurstiisio This person has never been demonstrated to exist. Casey chose the name.

@vinny strobel yup, heard this young parent dosed their kid to party on weekends since she had no babysitter,  but idk if it’s true or not. Only that my friend was out a this person who said so. Their circle is young party parents tho so I believe it

That might be how she died...being given Xanex so Casey could party.

I can't think of any other reason why Zenaida's nickname would be Zanny lmao

Child abuse and endangerment were never mentioned in that case.  Intended murder versus accidental ? If accidental, we would have seen remorse or sadness in Cayse Anthony . None of it was there. She was afraid to spend the rest of her life in jail or to get the death penalty which was on the table. She did not care about the lost child or her parents. Typical psychopaths do not care about anyone ; they like their persona pleasures, at any cost......

@vinny strobel it truly was all about how people saw her. The reason she lied about everything makes so much sense when you realize that. Piece of shit human. Someone semi-decent would’ve just given the baby to the grandparents.

@necrocoy possible. Her parents should have talked her into it more.

@Kyle John thank you! 💖 appreciate the recommendation!

@necrocoy she actually hid her pregnancy and denied it to anyone who could tell (listen to the rotten mango podcast)

@John Smith not entirely true. Abortions were not at all difficult to obtain at the time of Casey’s pregnancy. I suspect, she went through with the pregnancy because she enjoyed the attention she got while pregnant. She had her daughter, the attention switched from her to the baby and she realized she didn’t like being a parent and felt that Caylee cramped her lifestyle.

@John Smith because she wants her parents to think she has everything under control and doesn’t need their help. It’s obvious she wanted to be independent. Now why she decided to have a kid is my question

@John Smith right bc if she just couldn't be a mom anymore she could have given up custody to her parents

No bc she wants mom and dad to think shes a good mom. By bringing the kid to them so she can party makes her look bad I mean I agree with you but I bet that was her thinking

Pretty sure she could have just left the kid at the parents house

Zanny is a street name for Xanax I think.

At the time I was thinking, the fake nanny’s name rhymes with nanny?!

With how she acts, it really would not be a surprise if that was actually the reason...<br>An explanation for why she so obviously named the nanny after a medication

With how she acts, it really would not be a surprise if that was actually the reason...
An explanation for why she so obviously named the nanny after a medication


yo wait where’d the get the evidence that her dad touched her


It boggles my mind that the jury came back with a "not guilty" verdict. Justice was not served here. They let a baby killer WALK. But alas, she'll never be free in the public eye. So at least theres that.

@bloochoo She ran her fathers name through the mud plus some. Yet at the end of the day, this is his daughter. His baby girl.

I wouldnt be surprised if he was involved getting that verdict. Hell, I wouldnt be surprised if he told her to say he molested her.

Hes a retired cop and he didnt flinch when the defense dropped the molestation angle. AT ALL! I would start flipping tables.

Too many angles to this.

Crazy Diamond 💎 yea. Case was so huge—the name Casey Anthony known would remind you of a murderer

@Crazy Diamond 💎 Negative i dont think her look gives her away now. To much time has passed! BUT almost every employer googles the names of new workers. Thats giving her away.

@Jamie Brown gtfo! Omg I hope that's not true! 😯

@axollot lori vallow, oh dont get me started on that one and her brother. Both serial killers in my opinion. Omg those poor kids. Awful what happened, especially when charles begged the police to listen to him.

Yo but its like he said only .3% of the cases are put in the lime light.. Im sure there are worse things but they also filter it. No one is going to tell you about a woman eating her baby for example 😂 because no one would notice.

She works as a fricken nanny now, WTF. That’s justice in America🤷🏽♀

@zakky P Do you mean that you know something that the jury didn't know ? Then speak about it.

@Crazy Diamond 💎 she's different again. Like the Lori Vallow case? She reminds me of a grown Casey.
Same manner. Same detachment from everyone else and lies, lies lies.
Lori was a bit better at it as she was not living at home and had to get by in the world on her bs.

It's sociopathy but they almost deserve another  sub category. It's just strange to watch.

Crazy Diamond 💎 How is her “never being free in the public eye” of any significance? What do you mean by that?

Crazy Diamond 💎 She’s a woman, of course she got away, women can’t do anything wrong silly

Idk why, but I thought she was found not guilty by reason of insanity

Crazy Diamond 💎 This reminds me of Karla Homolka hooking up with her attorney’s brother and having children with him. Casey and Karla two extremely messed up people.  Casey has a huge skull and what appears to me male collarbones. Something tells me there’s far more to this story than we will ever know.

@Crazy Diamond 💎 it's always about that. Prosecutors MUST consider what charge is convictable... Or you run the risk of walking.

In this case, there was a very serious lack of actual physical evidence to prove she did it. And all the defense has to prove is a reasonable doubt, not that she didn't commit the crime. Just that it's possible that she did not.

The risk of imprisoning innocent people must be the number one precaution in justice. And with that ultimate importance..... we will have these occasions where people walk.

@Dan Berkey i hope someone does.  Maybe someone who lost a child against their will, will recognize her one day and have nothing left to lose.

Beyond a reasonable doubt, she’s innocent!!!!

There's also another way of handling her.

@Crazy Diamond 💎 Yea, about that. She did. IDK if she still does but she did for a while after the verdict. He also paid for plastique surgery afterwords. It was obvious they were bumping fuzzies during the trial too.

Dark Heart that’s not dumb a lot of adults now were kids when this happened.

@Jesse Hupp it's a damn shame. Innocent child lost her life and cant even at least get justice

@Rampen she seems pretty narcissistic, at least to me. Would she even think about doing that? Edit: she hasnt done it yet and its been how long? Wouldn't she have done that by now?

@Crazy Diamond 💎 the issue is the prosecution thought they had a slam dunk and phoned in the evidence thats how she got off also so much time had passed i am sure any other evidence collected would have gotten zoomed by the defense

@Crazy Diamond 💎 Give it a few years more, a name change, move to a different location and without a doubt there wont be an issue for her at all.

@zakky P ugh that's gross. She shouldn't be allowed to have children ever again. Wonder if shes still living with her attorney 🙄 smh

@Lonnie Thomas Possibly. However, I think they were right in charging her with first degree. From all the evidence released and everything we have seen, definitely seems premeditated. The google search, the duct tape on Caylees mouth and nose, the clear lack of remorse after the fact, etc. I also found a video here on youtube that has Marcia Clark investigating as to why they decided on not guilty and I guess all the evidence wasn't presented in court?! And they had people on the stand that didnt know what they were doing or talking about and I guess that gave enough doubt for the jurors? Idk tho, I'd say that they were able to provide enough evidence and show Casey's constant lies to be able to provide a guilty verdict. Maybe if they had added both first and second degree charges they would've gotten it but idk if they are even able to do that. Upsetting nonetheless!

@cmiller8492 There was an article recently, like within the past year, that was saying Casey was complaining cuz she couldnt get a real job and no one would hire her. She still has to fill out those apps with her name. I think once people see that and then her face, they know. I would think itd be hard to forget a baby killer.

It’s because they charged her with first degree murder if they would have down graded the charges she would be in prison at the moment

Shit is beyond fucked it’s like any one person could be like “oh yeah she definitely did it” but the system as a whole is just like “nah dude” and then she comes out about wanting to have another child. Like why?


I’m just shocked that she was able to get away with killing her child, lying constantly, and saying her daddy touched her. Even with all the evidence, presented people can still be persuaded by a snake of an attorney. It’s sad and unjust. If I were the parents, I wouldn’t have anything to do with her again. She wants to live a wild and free life, so be it.  But you won’t be part of my life. RIP, little one...

@Fabiana Moura Sometimes I am this way and could never see myself trying to defend a criminal. But also, I read about cases like these I always find myself playing devils advocate, I don’t know why, I think what they did or what they are accused of doing is disgusting but I still ponder the idea of defending them or finding innocence in them.🤷♀😑 let me go talk to a psychiatrist real quick.

@Marko Bighead Also, I understand she was not guilty in the court of law. I also understand her attorney did his job and saved her ass. She is free, which I understand, but I think she does not deserve freedom. Her trial was not based on evidence because if it was she would be guilty. The jury messed up in this case.

@iWoofz Me too! We'd be the worst attorneys ever lol. Well at least we'd still be decent human beings ^^

@Giga_Plays it isnt but its still his job and he has a duty to fulfill it

@tastyham  He should go to jail huh? Thank christ people like you aren't in any position to imprison anybody on your whim. Hes just a silver tongued lawyer, just because you don't like the outcome isnt a valid reason to imprison people genius. What about the damn jury? It's their verdicts that determine the actual outcome, it's not up to the lawyers entirely lol.. do any of you know how this works?

@Giga_Plays What you're saying in this particular case really isnt making sense. What did he do that was "bad?" That just sounds really infantile, hes a lawyer that's what they do.. he didnt kill the kid and hide the remains, also we have a right to council so they have to defend their clients anyway. So is right to private or public council for EVERYBODY a "bad" thing also? What about the jury, their verdicts determined the outcome not just her council.

@V As long as there is no direct evidence that you murdered her, correct. This is how the courts work.

@Marko Bighead so if I do research on how to kill my daughter (that just happens to be exactly the way she died), have all the items I need to do it and that are later found with the body, there is clear evidence of me hiding her corpse, there is overwhelming evidence of me avoiding law enforcement or doing anything that could help solve the case, even misleading them and contradicting myself, I go partying for a month, having fun and caring less about her death than my friends, I was literally the only person with her when she died and I have a history of being a manipulative, compulsive liar to get away with living my life how I want. I can just get away by saying that she died in an accidental manner with no proof whatsoever and months after being interrogated multiple times?<br>I understand that there is no concrete evidence of the actual moment of the murder, but there is a monumental amount of evidence before and after "it" pointing towards her, when in opposition her claim of it being an accident has none and it just goes through some mental gymnastics to try and justify her nonchalant reaction by claiming that (idk if with any real evidence)she was molested as a kid. The sistem is fucked

@Marko Bighead so if I do research on how to kill my daughter (that just happens to be exactly the way she died), have all the items I need to do it and that are later found with the body, there is clear evidence of me hiding her corpse, there is overwhelming evidence of me avoiding law enforcement or doing anything that could help solve the case, even misleading them and contradicting myself, I go partying for a month, having fun and caring less about her death than my friends, I was literally the only person with her when she died and I have a history of being a manipulative, compulsive liar to get away with living my life how I want. I can just get away by saying that she died in an accidental manner with no proof whatsoever and months after being interrogated multiple times?
I understand that there is no concrete evidence of the actual moment of the murder, but there is a monumental amount of evidence before and after "it" pointing towards her, when in opposition her claim of it being an accident has none and it just goes through some mental gymnastics to try and justify her nonchalant reaction by claiming that (idk if with any real evidence)she was molested as a kid. The sistem is fucked

I wouldnt be able to be an attorney, id just be like "bruh fine this lady killed her kid im out"

@Marko Bighead Not all the evidence was presented during the trial. And that was a failure.  Duck tape does not equal pool drowning. She killed that little girl.

@DigitalResurrection No, it doesn't. There isn't even any consensus on how her child died, let alone who did it. And it obviously isn't damming if it didn't damn her in the end.
I'm not debating what she did or didn't get away with, or what actually happened or questioning her moral character. I'm stating the fact that there was no evidence that she killed her child and a jury of her peers agrees. If you were to openly declare what you are in a documented public forum, you could rightfully be sued for libel.
Did she lie to police? Yes, and she was charged.
Did she, at one point, possess her child's body in an attempt to hide it? Yes, forensic evidence proves it.
Does she care about her child? No, her behaviour demonstrates this.
How did her child die? We don't know.
Did she kill her child? There's no evidence that definitively proves that she did. And that's all that matters in a court room.

@DigitalResurrection All circumstantial. There is no evidence she killed her child. Where there is no proof, there is no guilty verdict. It's not what you know, or what happened, it's what you can prove in court.

@Marko Bighead She looked up on how to suffocate a child and wrote in her journal that she made the best decision in her life and was so happy when her child was missing. She made up people and never reported her child missing while living the life. There is plenty of evidence that she premeditated and was non-remorseful in her child's death. It's not uncommon for women to kill their children to date a man or live their lives how they want.

@tastyham no. He was given the certain information, and if he did not perform his job correctly he would be fired, sued, and could be stripped of his ability to practice law. If Casey said to him "I killed my child" then he could have done something, but she never confessed to them. He took the information he was given and did his job with said information. I'm sure he regrets it but that's the problem with being an attorney. It doesnt matter who you defend, you have to defend them to the best of your ability and without personal judgement, or else you'll lose your job and tarnish your reputation.

@Giga_Plays You're like that one dude in Dexter who murders an innocent defense attourney. You can't be serious

I blame the jury for being stupid/complaisant enough to render a not guilty verdict. What's in the water down in Florida?

@Marko Bighead there was the pretty damning google searches, altho that was only discovered after her trial i think. that's definitely more than "no proof of her involvement"

There was no evidence she killed her child. Only evidence she lied to police, which she was charged for, and that she most likely attempted to hide the body. But how we got from alive child to dead child, there was no proof of her involvement.

@Nick Schweiss and that's exactly what I mean, he is doing his job, but that just is not good at all.

he legally has to do what he did. its fucked up, but so is the majority of the legal system

that's how Jury trials are, they can go really sideways. The pressure of being in a room with yelling for hours at a time and then a need to find her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Our justice system is built to intentionally skew verdicts so that we release guilty people more than we jail innocent people. These days, with what's been done to the constitution, that isn't always the case but it was the original structure of the courts.

@Giga_Plays he did exactly what he was supposed to do. Defense attorneys do not defend people. They defend people's rights to fair and equal trials, overstepping by prosecutors and investigators, and ensure that crimes are met with appropriate punishments. His job is to take whatever her side of the story is and make it appease legal and courtroom formalities and develop strategies to ensure her side is heard and understood. I'm sure he'd love to imagine everyone he defends is innocent, but that's simply not a part of his duty as a lawyer. I'm sure he'd love to lock this sick fuck up, but that's not his decision to make.

people are not free to think. You 're so wrong if you think that way. We believe we are free but we aren't.

@Giga_Plays you can't blame the man for doing his job well, blame the jury.  or better yet, blame casey.

@Kalmani Saying "it is his job" is no justification for him doing something bad. It's what he does for a living, but that doesn't make it good.

@William Caudill Its horrible, but its his job. People hate defense attorneys but its their job


Was she  drug addicted most young people her age in Florida are you know