I still cannot even fathom how she’s not locked up right now

Update: obviously she had a great lawyer, and the prosecution was lacking in evidence. Obviously, people shouldn’t be convicted without substantial evidence, I just feel like there’s DEF evidence, and they just weren’t competent enough to expose it.

@notafake account yes, I get it. It just seems like she totally had something to do with it. It’s more hard to fathom that no one found anything.

@notafake account yes, I get it. It just seems like she totally had something to do with it. It’s more hard to fathom that no one found anything.

@Alma Miranda yes, I agree. You just get that gut feeling that she wasn’t innocent. I wish they figured out what really happened and could present evidence.

@Ally Lou
I have made several comments. I’m glad someone agrees with at least one of them but which of my comments are you saying you concur with?
You’re also saying that you agree with Laurie Bird and I disagree with quite a lot of what she has said.
Especially the part about it not being possible to be racist against white people. It absolutely is possible. In fact it’s quite common.

Casey I hope you read this I hope karma catches up with u.

Casey I hope you read this I hope karma catches up with u.

@notafake account because the jury didn't seem to be brightest sparks or even cared

@notafake account because the jury didn't seem to be brightest sparks or even cared

Ok when the detective is speaking to her ....who's trained in questions to ask and to see how she answers them she was not sat there like she was speaking of her child it was like she was speaking bloke she was in a job interview laughter flirting .....I sorry she's killed her own kid or had bloke do it for her how ever her part was there.  To busy partying and smoking blow.  Tell me how she get to work in criminology??<br>What the f!!!

Ok when the detective is speaking to her ....who's trained in questions to ask and to see how she answers them she was not sat there like she was speaking of her child it was like she was speaking bloke she was in a job interview laughter flirting .....I sorry she's killed her own kid or had bloke do it for her how ever her part was there.  To busy partying and smoking blow.  Tell me how she get to work in criminology??
What the f!!!

@Desy no because I feel she is a social path no remorse... what I see she was relieved that she was gone.

@Desy no because I feel she is a social path no remorse... what I see she was relieved that she was gone.

@Nicholas Marshall I read that case of OJ Simpson and saw the actual photos of well what happened.  Explain's how she got off as OJ so guilty so guilty killing his ex wife. She only got upset when it was about her not about her child if your child has gone missing surely you be in a distrort state phoning police and doing anything to find her and phone your mum.  What gets me so many people lie her get litually away with murder.

Maybe because she is a woman? Women can't do anything wrong as they say now.

Maybe because she is a woman? Women can't do anything wrong as they say now.

What was that about her dad abusing her when she was young? Her actually dad was at the hearing, I am confused

What was that about her dad abusing her when she was young? Her actually dad was at the hearing, I am confused

And this is what America is messed up. How on earth did she get away with that at all is so corrupt. If I was on that Jury I would of gone with guilty on all accounts. So if she didn’t kill Caylee, who did? Doesn’t even seem like they were even bothered about that at all. This is so sad.

Halo Effect (in relation to good looks and how to judge good looking people to be of better morale character), MONEY and a SENSATIONAL lawyer.

Halo Effect (in relation to good looks and how to judge good looking people to be of better morale character), MONEY and a SENSATIONAL lawyer.

@Laurie Bird Yeah here it is buddy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentencing_disparity

@Laurie Bird Yeah here it is buddy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentencing_disparity

Probably her looks or she done something behind closed doors. Then to get offers from playboy and tv shows? Cmon

Probably her looks or she done something behind closed doors. Then to get offers from playboy and tv shows? Cmon

@Arthur I guess Jodi Arias missed out on that privilege hey?

@Arthur I guess Jodi Arias missed out on that privilege hey?

She's white and pretty. She also got very lucky in her jury picks.

She's white and pretty. She also got very lucky in her jury picks.

@notafake account drowned in pool but was duct taped and put in a swamp, made imaginary people up, car boot smelled of a body, searched suffication on computer, went out partying... And you think innocent?

@Desy You think she's feeling guilt? no chance...

@Desy You think she's feeling guilt? no chance...

@murmurzz Also, this therm "reverse racism" another silly neo-logism created by the ideology that you are espousing.  Unless one re-defines "the therm "racism" to assume it's own conclusion, it is a meaningless term.

If you honestly want to modify the definition of such an overwhelmingly-important term, try proposing the modification straightforwardly, rather than simply declaring it to be so.

The problem that arises directly is that you would have to say something like, "I think racism should be defined based on ones race, rather than on anything meaningfully objective".  -Which is a very silly thing to say.

@murmurzz Also, this therm "reverse racism" another silly neo-logism created by the ideology that _you_ are espousing.  Unless one re-defines "the therm "racism" to assume it's own conclusion, it is a meaningless term.

If you honestly want to modify the definition of such an overwhelmingly-important term, try proposing the modification straightforwardly, rather than simply declaring it to be so.

The problem that arises directly is that you would have to say something like, "I think racism should be defined based on ones race, rather than on anything meaningfully objective".  -Which is a very silly thing to say.

@murmurzz Well, one race"_is_ inherently "racist", whilst another "race" is not...   Regardless of anything any "individuals" actually do or do not do, and regardless of the content of ones character, no?

Is that not a fair summation of your position?

@murmurzz Yes folks.  You either believe or you are an unwitting part of systemic oppression

@murmurzz Yes folks.  You either believe or you are an unwitting part of systemic oppression

@Jengleheimer Schmitt I don't even know what you're saying. Nowhere did I say that you can tell if someone is racist by just looking at their skin. Where tf are you getting this from? I'm done, folks. If you don't understand my point than you probably never will. One last time: especially in the USA, white men have held the majority of the power. While white women were considered inferior, they still had privilege and power over others just because they were white. Therefore, reverse racism cannot exist because we have always had the advantage. K, I'm done repeating myself. You either get it or you don't.

@murmurzz I Are you seriously claiming that you can tell whether or not someone is "racist" without knowing anything at all other than their race?   If you don't see the absurdity of that, I think you must be entiierly immune to noticing absurdity.   Perhaps you have a "deep-rooted and systemic" immunity to noticing absurdity.

@murmurzz You are expressing "deep-rooted and systemic" bias. And you are very clearly defending judging people based on the color of their skin rather than the content of their character.

Re-defining words to make your prejudice appear virtuous is only a linguistic trick.  It is not a claim about the nature of reality, it is simply modifying definitions to launder and glorify your own ideological prejudice.H

@Laurie Bird tf do you mean you can’t be racist to a what’re person???

@Laurie Bird tf do you mean you can’t be racist to a what’re person???

@Sebastian johansson Damn, you beat me to it lol

@Sebastian johansson Damn, you beat me to it lol

@Jengleheimer Schmitt Are you referring to my link about reverse racism being a myth? The fact is that <b>individuals</b> could have their own bias against all white people - which I do not agree with and is definitely their own prejudice but there is not a deep-rooted and systemic racism towards white ppl. That is why reverse racism is not a thing.

@Jengleheimer Schmitt Are you referring to my link about reverse racism being a myth? The fact is that *individuals* could have their own bias against all white people - which I do not agree with and is definitely their own prejudice but there is not a deep-rooted and systemic racism towards white ppl. That is why reverse racism is not a thing.

@murmurzz That is a definitional change.  You can re-define anything to mean something else.   Changing definitions doesn't change reality.

@murmurzz That is a definitional change.  You can re-define anything to mean something else.   Changing definitions doesn't change reality.

@murmurzz you cant even understand my point i end it here have a nice day

@murmurzz you cant even understand my point i end it here have a nice day

@antipsychotic i guess she never neglected her child caring mother

@antipsychotic i guess she never neglected her child caring mother

@Sebastian johansson Yo, we're talking about racism so ...huh? It has everything to do with skin tone

@Sebastian johansson Yo, we're talking about racism so ...huh? It has everything to do with skin tone

The jury was like literally stupid to not find her guilty.

The jury was like literally stupid to not find her guilty.

@Clown World That’s probably true.  But I won’t say for sure.

@Clown World That’s probably true.  But I won’t say for sure.

yeah its a real shame the justice system isnt just and treats women different than men. if she were a man that did this she would be on death row and everyone knows it

@Alma Miranda She’s definitely guilty.  But it all comes down to evidence, or lack of,  and that’s what freed her.  Unfortunately.

@Alma Miranda She’s definitely guilty.  But it all comes down to evidence, or lack of,  and that’s what freed her.  Unfortunately.

@Alma Miranda i feel you but i mean what mother doesn’t call the police for 31 days thats sum sus shit.

@Alma Miranda i feel you but i mean what mother doesn’t call the police for 31 days thats sum sus shit.

@Ranjit Tyagi not personally but I belueve in a life for a life. As does God.

@Ranjit Tyagi not personally but I belueve in a life for a life. As does God.

ok calm down everyone, if she was a man she would be in prison, we all know it..

ok calm down everyone, if she was a man she would be in prison, we all know it..

I wonder what the verdict would have been if it was black man instead of Casey in same setting.

I wonder what the verdict would have been if it was black man instead of Casey in same setting.

@Desy she has never felt guilty for killing her own child

@Desy she has never felt guilty for killing her own child

I did not follow this case didn't have nothing to do with it also did not know that she did not get charged for murdering her child. Oh no she might have been able to pull the blindfold over the jury but when the real judgment the one that matters is here we all know what's going to happen to her God knows the truth and he will judge accordingly

@Nicholas Marshall Where is Casey Anthony now. January 1st 2021 Casey Anthony has filed documents to start a private investigation firm, according to Florida state records. The address listed for the company belongs to Patrick McKenna, according to Palm Beach County property records.

McKenna was the lead investigator on Anthony’s defense team during her 2011 trial.

In a 2017 interview, Anthony told The Associated Press that she had been working for McKenna doing online social media searches and other investigative work. McKenna was also the lead investigator for O.J. Simpson, when he was accused of killing his wife and acquitted

@Hrist Sunstrider Where is Casey Anthony now. January 1st 2021 Casey Anthony has filed documents to start a private investigation firm, according to Florida state records. The address listed for the company belongs to Patrick McKenna, according to Palm Beach County property records.

McKenna was the lead investigator on Anthony’s defense team during her 2011 trial.

In a 2017 interview, Anthony told The Associated Press that she had been working for McKenna doing online social media searches and other investigative work. McKenna was also the lead investigator for O.J. Simpson, when he was accused of killing his wife and acquitted

@Krihoise Where is Casey Anthony now. January 1st 2021 Casey Anthony has filed documents to start a private investigation firm, according to Florida state records. The address listed for the company belongs to Patrick McKenna, according to Palm Beach County property records.

McKenna was the lead investigator on Anthony’s defense team during her 2011 trial.

In a 2017 interview, Anthony told The Associated Press that she had been working for McKenna doing online social media searches and other investigative work. McKenna was also the lead investigator for O.J. Simpson, when he was accused of killing his wife and acquitted

because 30 days has passed, they didnt have any hard evidence that shows she killed her so it all falls down to how good her defense lawyers was. she can live a good life now but she will meet her daughter again in the afterlife and answer to the court of God.

It's the American justice system, super flawed, so many innocent people get locked up while obvious guilty people get to go free. 🤷♂

It's the American justice system, super flawed, so many innocent people get locked up while obvious guilty people get to go free. 🤷♂

@Sebastian johansson Generalizing and racism are bad, but not against people I don't like. I don't even see them as hypocrites anymore, just the enemy.

@Sebastian johansson Generalizing and racism are bad, but not against people I don't like. I don't even see them as hypocrites anymore, just the enemy.

@murmurzz aa yes just put every white person in one grup and say they have power <br>This argument is stupid

@murmurzz aa yes just put every white person in one grup and say they have power
This argument is stupid

Thank god we have educated people working as lawyers and not this comment section

Thank god we have educated people working as lawyers and not this comment section

Cuz her lawyer charming as hell and convinced the jury

Cuz her lawyer charming as hell and convinced the jury

Man what a trial im still not certain on what her excuse was that her daughter was dead. Was it an accidentally drown?

Man what a trial im still not certain on what her excuse was that her daughter was dead. Was it an accidentally drown?

@Sebastian johansson "White people can indeed face stereotypical assumptions based on their skin colour and hence encounter racial prejudice. But this cannot be called racism, because of the inherent systemic imbalance of power between those with lighter skin colour and people of colour. Racial prejudice can affect people on an individual level, but it would not have the same effect on a larger social and cultural level because it is only when stereotypes are bolstered by power, such as through a eurocentric model of thinking, that it creates systemic and structural racism and oppression that people of colour have encountered throughout history."

- Dr Pragya Agarwal, author and behavioural scientist

Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2020/03/09/can-white-people-experience-racism-12340542/?ito=cbshare

@mastered   so  true takes a sick person to hate some one else for something they cant change

@mastered   so  true takes a sick person to hate some one else for something they cant change

@Laurie Bird that twitter profile tells me something different, you dating whoever doesn't matter. female

interesting how you did not deny the hating white people part tho :D

@mastered *woman. and that’s not me. in fact, im currently dating someone of mixed race sooo, nice try :)

@mastered *woman. and that’s not me. in fact, im currently dating someone of mixed race sooo, nice try :)

@Sebastian johansson you’re making me laugh a lot, please keep going 😂😂 the ignorance JUMPED OUT and it’s hilarious

@Sebastian johansson you’re making me laugh a lot, please keep going 😂😂 the ignorance JUMPED OUT and it’s hilarious

She's not locked up because of the sad reality that sometimes your charisma and   well honed skill of lying overrides facts and evidence. I know it sounds horrible and dark, but what other explanation could there be to something like this?

@Sebastian johansson if you’re white then i’m not about to deal with your ignorance lmao bye

@Sebastian johansson if you’re white then i’m not about to deal with your ignorance lmao bye

let me help you the word is SHE thats why

let me help you the word is SHE thats why

@ATomRileyA you can’t be racist towards a white person. also, if you read the end of the article it says “Past studies have also found that minority men are, on average, given longer prison sentences than white men convicted of the same crimes”. it’s all about the skin too. these women usually are white and are not seen as a threat. put a black person up there and they are easily convicted

@Laurie Bird https://www.huffpost.com/entry/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742

"The study found that men receive sentences that are 63 percent higher, on average, than their female counterparts.

Starr also found that females arrested for a crime are also significantly more likely to avoid charges and convictions entirely, and twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted."

@CJD
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742
"The study found that men receive sentences that are 63 percent higher, on average, than their female counterparts.

Starr also found that females arrested for a crime are also significantly more likely to avoid charges and convictions entirely, and twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted."

So female privilege is a thing and tbh being a woman i know this to be true we do have it pretty easy.

@The Eyes Have IT Who are you to bring justice?

@The Eyes Have IT Who are you to bring justice?

@Laurie Bird
By the way, I don’t believe there’s any such thing as female privilege or any other kind of systemic privilege based on race or gender in our criminal justice system. I know there are times when it’s not applied equally for everyone and there are miscarriages of justice but those are isolated incidents not part of a deliberate systemic bias. There’s wealth privilege because people who have lots of money can afford better lawyers and they have a higher position in society. That is a flaw and it shouldn’t be that way but I don’t think there’s anyplace where that doesn’t exist.

Also, your response to me would have been appropriate if I had been the one who said that but I wasn’t.
That was the third eye who said that, not me.

@Vlad the Impala my bad, thought that was you who made the comment. my apologies, but it’s still white privilege

@Vlad the Impala my bad, thought that was you who made the comment. my apologies, but it’s still white privilege

@Laurie Bird <br>Wow! You sure told me. Except I never said anything about female privilege or any other kind of privilege.

@Laurie Bird
Wow! You sure told me. Except I never said anything about female privilege or any other kind of privilege.

@Vlad the Impala “bullshit” “horseshit” “chicken shit” that’s exactly how your “female privilege” comment sounded. that’s not even a thing. if you watched other videos on here or literally have watched any true crime case in general (which clearly you haven’t), you would know that there are many many WOMEN who have been convicted of murder. so don’t pull the “she’s a girl, that’s why she got away with it” it’s just ignorant

@antipsychotic
Yes that’s the way our justice system works. We don’t convict based on emotion or gut feeling or even if we know for sure that the defendant is guilty. The burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused. If the prosecution didn’t prove her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt then the jury has to acquit. (Like if the glove doesn’t fit or something.)
I don’t know if they proved it or not. I wasn’t there. Apparently they didn’t. It’s better to set a guilty person free than to imprison or execute an innocent person.
Even so, I’m not glad she got away with it. I just wish that the prosecution had been able to prove her guilty.

She’s thinking about having another child. If she was in prison or dead she wouldn’t be having (and possibly killing) more children.
Of course if she does have another child the whole country is going to be paying attention. I don’t think she’ll get away with it again.

@CJD <br>Really? That should be easily supported with evidence then. Care to share?

@CJD
Really? That should be easily supported with evidence then. Care to share?

@Desy <br>She won’t feel guilty. She’s a psychopath. Incapable of empathy or remorse.

@Desy
She won’t feel guilty. She’s a psychopath. Incapable of empathy or remorse.

@Arthur that should be easily supported with evidence, then. Care to share?

@Arthur that should be easily supported with evidence, then. Care to share?

Female privilege. It's a fact, atleast in the courts.

Female privilege. It's a fact, atleast in the courts.

@tleia ralte No, because of the legal clause known as double jeopardy

@tleia ralte No, because of the legal clause known as double jeopardy

Well thank god you're not the jury then, since nobody could prove shit.

Well thank god you're not the jury then, since nobody could prove shit.

@antipsychotic yeah and they knew that and they decided to go with the emotional route which didnt work

@antipsychotic yeah and they knew that and they decided to go with the emotional route which didnt work

@antipsychotic True, but it's so goddamn obvious it kills me inside.

@antipsychotic True, but it's so goddamn obvious it kills me inside.

@antipsychotic People do not understand that. Regardless of how we feel about her, if every trial was conducted without evidence there would be an enormous amount of innocent people in jail. People do not understand the process of law. Someone did not do their job collecting evidence.

because they didn't have compelling evidence to convict her of murder. i'm glad she's not in prison with the overwhelming lack of compelling evidence the prosecutors had.

@Hrist Sunstrider fucked up. That makes me mad

@Hrist Sunstrider fucked up. That makes me mad

@The Eyes Have IT Been at least 9 or 10 years, hardly anything gonna happen to her i think.

@The Eyes Have IT Been at least 9 or 10 years, hardly anything gonna happen to her i think.

@Ally Lou right! Id call the police if my kid was missing for five minutes

@Ally Lou right! Id call the police if my kid was missing for five minutes

Woah. I never followed this case. Didnt know this evil demon wasn't in jail. Time for street justice. I hope someone brings it to her.

Woah. I never followed this case. Didnt know this evil demon wasn't in jail. Time for street justice. I hope someone brings it to her.

not only is she not locked up, she WORKS in the legal system. From a 2017 interview: Anthony lives in the South Florida home of Patrick McKenna, a private detective who was the lead investigator on her defense team. She also works for him, doing online social media searches and other investigative work. McKenna was also the lead investigator for OJ Simpson, when he was accused of killing his wife and acquitted; Anthony said she's become fascinated with the case, and there are "a lot of parallels" to her own circumstances.

I concur deeply disturbed that she's got away with it. <br>How come she's not hysterical that her daughter been taken...

I concur deeply disturbed that she's got away with it.
How come she's not hysterical that her daughter been taken...

I am so pissed off that she got away with it, with so much against her, as she wished in her diary, her happiness actually grew, she did not have to take care of her child, could party as much as she wanted and got away with murder.

It disturbs me what happened to jury, everything was in front of them still they set this waste of human life free😒

It disturbs me what happened to jury, everything was in front of them still they set this waste of human life free😒


I must say, she's an impressive liar. She's exceptionally good at going into enough detail to seem believable but not so much that it seems suspicious.

Having a police officer as a dad will do that


Where does Casey live?
As of 2017, Anthony was living in South Florida with Patrick McKenna, a private detective who worked as the lead investigator on her case in the 2011 trial in the death of her daughter. McKenna is also known for his work on the O.J. Simpson case, the former NFL star who was charged and later acquitted in the murder of his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson.

Absolutely insane


Poor Cindy. A grandmother’s love is so real.


The lies. The prosecutors really messed this case up or her defense attorney was the best in the world. I still can’t believe she got away with this.


“She wasn’t an event coordinator. She sold photos of people after they had been on The Incredible Hulk ride” <br>You just roasted someone by simply stating a fact lol

“She wasn’t an event coordinator. She sold photos of people after they had been on The Incredible Hulk ride”
You just roasted someone by simply stating a fact lol

People using quotation marks, always getting the quote wrong

Gave you your 20.000st thump up. Well deserved! 🙂👍

@Dallas Van Winkle
Way to help her get a leg up.
Everyone uses titles that sound better than the real thing - If my business card said "guy who fobbs people off on the phone for a faceless corporation", I wouldn't get that much business would I?
If she was your janitor, she WAS coordinating your facilities. Using the wrong cleaning fluids WILL damage flooring surfaces. Using the wrong quantities Will leave residues that present a slipping hazard. Using the same mop in the kitchen as was used in the toilet WILL spread germs.
Her coordination meant that your facilities ran in a more safe and efficient manner.

Would it have been so hard to give another person a hand up?

@David Lilleøren you don't go free if you plead insanity. check "what pretending to be crazy looks like" in this channel, you're misinformed and clearly just trying to justify your women hatred

I lost it at this line. The delivery is just 👌

@Destiny no the narrator said Juliette didn't exist at all. Completely made up. He said Casey Anthony worked with the hulk ride

Yes, @Bologna, even in my small country Norway, several women who killed their children just walked away, pleading insanity etc

Just awful that a child murderer goes free because she’s a woman and not a man. We see this all the time.

An event coordinator at Universal??  that in itself makes no sense

@Taylor lmao I have that job but with River Adventure not Hulk

@Joey C You might have met the event coordinator?!

She didnt even work at the Universal, she took cops there and no one knew her.

She never worked there. The lady Juliette that she said was her friend and was an event coordinator was actually the one selling the photos.

All of a sudden everyone rode the Hulk around the time Casey worked there 🙄

in your eyes thats what that means. But these jurors need to quit being coaxed by prosecutors into finding an assailant to put these crimes at ease when no evidence exists. This is all cirmonstancial and not hard evidence. People forget that they need to prove "without a reason of doubt" before finding people guilty. Shame to those that use their option on the case at hand. It is the states job to prove without a shadow of a doubt otherwise. QUIT BEING A PART OF THROWING INNOCENT PEOPLE IN JAIL!!!

@Taylor it’s one thing to work that job, and it’s another thing lying about having a much more complicated job when in reality you had that one

This is the real life enactment of The Devils Advocate..

@Monica G. Davis It kind of reminds me of Meghan Markle telling a newspaper she was on the short list for the next Bond Girl. So the newspaper called up the producers of the Bond films and they laughed and said they'd never heard of her and she certainly wasn't on the short list. Some people just let lies roll off their tongues so easily. Logically, you know it's a lie but the way they deliver it, it sounds so plausible.

The events she was coordinating were the purchases of said photographs. Use your head.

you should look at all the casey videos on YARtv on youtube they show how the case was faked!

Taylor they only insulted people who have that job & lie about being event coordinators 🤷🏻♀

She was a event coordinator, she coordinated the sale of photos for the Hulk event . I rest my case.

She was a event coordinator, she *coordinated* the sale of photos for the Hulk *event* . I rest my case.

@Abdel Hassan She had NO job. If your job is to FIND a job & NOT steal from family and friends, that shouldn't be embarrassing, either.

Lied about everything and got away with it. She didn’t even use her right to remain silent. What a travesty of justice!

Reminds me of an employee I had. She was basically a janitor and she told our clients that she was a "Facilities Coordinator" right in front of me one time, was so awkward. After she left she used me as a reference. They called me and asked "So it says here she was a Facilities Coordinator"... I was like, uh, no she was basically a janitor. She also came across as a sociopath and definitely a liar.

And you just insulted everyone that has that job.

The fact that she lied was the pathetic part. Having a job, any job, shouldn't be insulting or embarassing in any way.

I rodethat ride around that time, and we ended up buying a picture. Makes me wonder.


Hearing the detectives basically say “we got you” and then learning she gets away makes my eyes fucking roll


DAMN, her lawyer was right "if you're unsure of what happened to Caylee, then Casey's guilt hasn't been proven and you shouldn't find her guilty." And EVERYONE figured she'd be found guilty. And he just checkmated everyone with a simple point. That was impressive lawyering. (But I thought it was off that he said "Casey did not murder Caylee" at the press conference. He just made the point that we're unable to make a definitive call on that.)


i remember when i was a kid watching her phone call with her parents. it's haunting remembering the whole case going down.


I'm not a psychiatrist, but one thing I noticed is that whenever Casey talks to her parents the parents sound like the child and Casey sounds like the parent.


Absolutely blows my mind to this day that she was not found guilty.

Absolutely blows my mind to this day that she was not found guilty.

@omegakrest yeah let's hope she never decides to have another baby. because if you ask me at all boiled down her being jealous of her daughter. Because she didn't get all the attention.

Yeah she's okay cuz she's in the arms of Jesus now so yeah she's perfectly okay. She was an okay though when this person killed her

But how was she not found guilty? I don't understand this everybody else in the entire planet knows she killed Kaylee. Why can't the jurors see it.

@Jelon Lennon Jose Baez in the beginning of the trial said “Casey lied, there is no Zanny the nanny”, he said “Caylee drowned in the backyard pool” then at the end of the trial Jose says “we may never know how Caylee died”.

Casey’s defense teamed pick jurors that they knew were stupid.

Casey’s defense teamed pick jurors that they knew were stupid.

@Withstandyes... and it's even more than the system and more than the evolutionary advantage... I wanted to thank you for your comment... hopefully you speak from your own assessment rather than some plagiarized movie line or publication... because it is a great assessment... and the reason is deeper than anyone realizes... the entire interface through which humanity interacts with itself is warped into a narcissistic perception... this interface that warps perception is present at conception but clicks on when  social interaction begins... it's not really a comment length subject to discuss... but some of the deepest research went into solving the self-destructive nature of humanity and where it stems from...

No really, how was she found not guilty?

No really, how was she found not guilty?

@Breakfast Television her behavior is enough though. And if not for murder, they could’ve gotten child neglect resulting in involuntary manslaughter if they believed the pool thing, and other charges for getting in the way of the investigation with the lies.

@Ug Ne We have a jury of peers because it's a democracy; to not leave your fate solely to some bought-out government official. However unreliable a jury can be sometimes, I'd still prefer that than having ANY politician decide my fate, thanks.

She was found not guilty because the prosecution overcharged her and focused too heavily on that over charge. They never had a definitive cause of death which made it rather hard to convict on first degree murder. They should have focused on potential child abuse and manslaughter with the hopes that the jury would convict on those charges and then with those two convictions it would help them make the leap to first degree homicide.

there is no such thing as innocent or guilty, only consequences

there is no such thing as innocent or guilty, only consequences

@Ug Ne id blame the system more than the ppl honestly. both sides of the case have the opportunity to misguide the jury on what certain laws or words mean, or what their jobs are etc. which is apparently what a lot of ppl think is what went wrong in this case. most ppl are reasonably intelligent just like you or me.

edit: person above me referenced OJ and thats a good example of how precious and careful the job of a juror is. look how messy that trial and the media surrounding it was.

@Ug Ne the idea is it's supposed to be a "jury of your peers", which means that they want a group of people who are not inherently biased for or against the defendant. So they call in a bunch of people for jury duty. Then the lawyers ask them questions to find out if they have any particular biases that would negatively or positively impact the case for their respective sides, and choose accordingly. It made sense at some point, but after 200 years anybody can figure out how to bend rules

@Ug Ne yknow the lawyers pick the jurors, right? They even get to ask potential jurors questions to figure out which way their biases would lean during the trial. The defence attorney was just a way better lawyer. Sad but true.

@Arminius Music What direct evidence was there that proves Caylee did not drown in the pool? I think she probably wasn’t watching her and she drowned. It happens all the time. The prosecution should have done a better job proving negligent homicide instead of focusing on chloroform and her partying.

I remember watching a documentary where they said they weren’t sure beyond a reasonable doubt, but if a mother threw out this many false flags, I’m not sure how they could possibly doubt it. It wouldn’t surprise me if her looks subconsciously helped her case

@Devs you have no idea what living in a broken system is like. Americans like jury’s because English common law treats each person as an individual rather than civil law where every aspect is codified and lacks the nuance of individualism.

wait what, I'm midway through the video and I though that she was in jail right now ( I haven't watch the court decision yet )

That's why you should always get a defense lawyer who looks and sounds like Alec Baldwin.

That's why you should always get a defense lawyer who looks and sounds like Alec Baldwin.

@Ug Ne To make it fair, If people who knew about how criminal system worked and how law worked they would be too hard on the criminal. If people who knew the perp or the victim did so then they would be biased. So the only people who can judge is random people who know nothing about the law who can be presented with evidence and try to make a decision

@Jamal Labarge Unlike dictatorships which don't need manipulation. I'd prefer a flawed system over an evil one.

@Ug Ne didn’t trump appoint like 6 judges in to courts that weren’t qualified for the jobs, it seems like the whole system is broken more or less

us justice ,the best in the world.,they say self, to make it even they convict innocent   to die.

@Breakfast Television there was enough evidence to have had her convicted.

@Breakfast Television there was enough evidence to have had her convicted.

@Joey Doherty well from what I've seen on crime channels rich people go unpunished (or win a case against someone poorer) either way. I'm not against jury itself but the people they put on there. If I had to imagine an improved version of this system, I'd say it would be great if people had to pass some short course that would assess their critical thinking skills beforehand. It boggles my mind that a compelling speech that is clearly constructed to appeal to emotion can change the outcome of a case in spite of evidence.

There was no direct physical evidence that linked her to the murder

There was no direct physical evidence that linked her to the murder

@Ug Ne But what would be better? If it was up to the judge or a hired jury, corruption can happen more easily.

Why? Why does this blow your mind? She is so obviously innocent. Her lawyers spiffy suit and engaging demeanor tells me she is certainly innocent. Not guilty. Why do you still pretend she’s a killer?

@Jamal Labarge The problem is is that many people escape justice because of juries. It might very well be that a lot of cases are not subject to juries, but the idea is that none should be. People who do not understand law and have had no education on the subject will very often judge cases based on feeling despite of evidence, an example of this is the Vicky Pryce trial where jurors repeatedly had to ask if they could speculate some things. Judges also prevent police misconduct, for instance if evidence is found when a cop forces himself into your home it cannot be used, yet if this were to be revealed to a jury (the evidence), a jury would likely still be biased and unable to fairly asses a case or events.
there are many examples of juries who completely ignore evidence for example this case or the infamous OJ simpson case, and go with their gut instead.

@Jamal Labarge The problem is is that many people escape justice because of juries. It might very well be that a lot of cases are not subject to juries, but the idea is that none should be. People who do not understand law and have had no education on the subject *will* very often judge cases based on feeling despite of evidence, an example of this is the Vicky Pryce trial where jurors repeatedly had to ask if they could speculate some things. Judges also prevent police misconduct, for instance if evidence is found when a cop forces himself into your home it cannot be used, yet if this were to be revealed to a jury (the evidence), a jury would likely still be biased and unable to fairly asses a case or events.
there are many examples of juries who completely ignore evidence for example this case or the infamous OJ simpson case, and go with their gut instead.

@BASILER A lot of crimes in the US are not subject to trial by jury.   Do they like that too?

@BASILER A lot of crimes in the US are not subject to trial by jury.   Do they like that too?

@Jamal Labarge Many Americans do not like the jury system, and are dissatisfied with the american justice system so you're false. Oh and please inform me why people should be unfamiliar with the law?

@Jamal Labarge naming authoritarian countries without a jury system doesn't prove your point. Most first world countries have normal civil law without a jury system (which means judges make the decision), and it has worked fine for them for years.  Also, the USA isn't the epitome of democracy, in fact it is at rank 27 on  CPI scale. (2021)

Yep. And that is exactly why I think we haven’t seen the best of her yet. We will probably hear more about her in the news one day.

Courtesy of the dumbest jury in history.

Courtesy of the dumbest jury in history.

@goatbut29   Many nations are not democracies - China isn't one.

Why is this a problem?

The US government likes democracies. They are easy manipulate.

@Ug Ne   What's your point?  That we need tribunals who judge according to government criterion?

You have a point, but you are shy about saying it.

@Ug Ne   We Americans like our justice system.   What the rest of the world does is their business.

Absolutely disgusting! She is guilty! This made me so 😡

Absolutely disgusting! She is guilty! This made me so 😡

@Ug Ne Yet people on social media can do the exact same thing with no knowledge of anything.

@Ug Ne Yet people on social media can do the exact same thing with no knowledge of anything.

@alex derek  "they intentional pick people who know nothing about the law."

Sounds like a democracy....

@Ug Ne    No, we need a Tribunal.  Composed of loyal government employees.

That's how most of the world works.   How is that working for China, Russia and North Korea?

@alex derek what's the logic behind that?? 🤔

@alex derek what's the logic behind that?? 🤔

@Ug Ne they intentional pick people who know nothing about the law.

@Ug Ne they intentional pick people who know nothing about the law.

I'm surprised jury is still a thing, a bunch of people who know nothing about crime deciding the fate of criminals depending on whether theyb "believe" the evidence. At least make them pass an iq check. This case should've been a slam dunk...


Whats sad too, is that her biological father passed away in a car crash before she was born.  Such a tragic story, all the way around.


She’s pathological liar and why people believed her lies against her father? The verdict turns out shocking


it's so funny to watch those amazing lawyers from homicide and very disturbing cases, then compare their skills with the team of the jhonny depp case. They are in a completely different league.


one of the most infuriating things about casey is that she speaks like a 2000s disney channel villain


The sad thing is Casey’s parents probably would have gladly taken custody of Caylee if Casey just asked them.

I mean.. she would've been safe but when they do things like cover up their daughter's lies and essentially reward it (with an actual false graduation party, mind you), it doesn't seem that they would've been very appropriate caregivers, either.

They begged her for custody and she refused.

They begged her for custody and she refused.

Naa she didn't want her parents to love her daughter more than her

Naa she didn't want her parents to love her daughter more than her

Sadly, she would have grown up the same as Casey did though.

Sadly, she would have grown up the same as Casey did though.

But then she's undeniably a terrible mom. Whereas this way she was able to be the center of attention and not demonized. Which didn't work, but she still got off from any charges

1:24
But why show a pic of Alanis Morrisette?

1:24
But why show a pic of Alanis Morrisette?

@Georgie I assume it's fictional because anyone can make unverifiable claims on the internet. I'm actually a state senator from Washington writing under a pseudonym. See? That's about as credible as your alleged law degree.

I think Casey Anthony is guilty, and your opinion in that regard has nothing to do with why I responded to you. Your asinine response to someone responding to one of your previous comments, however, was. I do wish that YT would actually specify which comment is being replied to, in order to avoid misunderstandings like this when dealing with those possessing poor reading comprehension skills.

If you'll note, I've responded to a few other individuals and comment threads on this video, so any feeling of being singled out is purely based on your own imaginings.

Also, it's a Sunday morning, what the hell else am I gonna be doing? It's one of my days off, so I will enjoy it as I see fit.

@Georgie I assume it's fictional because anyone can make unverifiable claims on the internet. I'm actually a state senator from Washington writing under a pseudonym. See? That's about as credible as your alleged law degree.

I think Casey Anthony is guilty, and your opinion in that regard has nothing to do with why I responded to you. Your asinine response to someone responding to one of your previous comments, however, was. I do wish that YT would actually specify *which* comment is being replied to, in order to avoid misunderstandings like this when dealing with those possessing poor reading comprehension skills.

If you'll note, I've responded to a few other individuals and comment threads on this video, so any feeling of being singled out is purely based on your own imaginings.

Also, it's a Sunday morning, what the hell else am I gonna be doing? It's one of my days off, so I will enjoy it as I see fit.

@Austin P if you read my original statement you wouldn’t feel the need to attack me in the first place. Troll.

@Georgie I feel like your reading comprehension is lacking. If you were actually a lawyer, that would be a pretty critical failing. I never said you couldn't be tried and convicted with only circumstantial evidence, or that doing so required a body. I just said that there was no direct evidence in this case, which is fact. I also said that the prosecution failed to make their case sufficiently, which is also fact; and is confirmed by the jury's decision. You are clearly the confused one in this case, but thanks for playing.

@squish y how could she do ANY of the things she did???

@squish y how could she do ANY of the things she did???

@Austin P I’m off tonight want a session

@Austin P I’m off tonight want a session

@Austin P I’m a literal therapist sweetheart

@Austin P I’m a literal therapist sweetheart

@Villanelle why were caylees remains found  with her  Winnie the Pooh blanket which was missing from the home ? It’s just horrible 🥺

@TJ Jordan I mean, that's how she got off. Iirc the trial there was no question she died, but the reasonable doubt was who was covering for who. That she like accidentally drowned and they panicked or something. Typing that out, I must be forgetting something it's insane she got off

And then the father would have tasted all of the family women.

And then the father would have tasted all of the family women.

@Someone Somewhere I’m currently having infertility problems but this sociopath gets have a child and I cant

I would have. I think so many people  would have given anything to have a little daughter. And she could have had her cake and eaten it too. Her parents would babysit while she went clubbing. But she's so narcissistic she saw her daughter as a rival for the grandma's affection.

Exactly… they seem like they would anyway

Exactly… they seem like they would anyway

Blithe She didn't get anything for neglect. There might not be proof she murdered caylee, but there was endless amounts of proof of neglect with what she did the 30 days after her little girl was dead/missing.

TJ Jordan That's not what happened. Her lawyer brought up the idea and her dad said he wasn't going to go with it. Not sure why he didn't sue the lawyers or his daughter after that for lying and ruining his image which then made it impossible for him to find work for a long time and added to his supposed attempt at suicide

I would have loved to take her. What a beautiful child, and how horrible that she had such a horrible, evil mother.

@Georgie what are you talking about??? i never insulted you, but alright ig.

have a good day

@Georgie what are you talking about??? i never insulted you, but alright ig.

have a good day

@Blithe I’m a lawyer. But thanks for the insults.

@Blithe I’m a lawyer. But thanks for the insults.

@Georgie you completely missed what the other person was getting at. despite how bad it was explained, i understand what they meant.

while casey looked guilty asf with all the lies, there's was PHYSICALLY nothing that could place her as the murderer, which is why she got away with it. unfortunately according to law, you can't put people in jail bc of a gut feeling and no physical evidence that proves they did it :/

I felt the same too. Even her friend would have

I felt the same too. Even her friend would have

I don't know about the father, they said there was sexual abuse but I have no idea if that was true since the defense only said that to get her off of the hook.

@Villanelle DNA is hirlously unreliable in comparison to how the general public see it. There has been criminal cases where there is cctv evidence which included the guys face and the jury let him off because the DNA evidence was inclusive. Also there has been a case of serial killer in Europe, which was actually just single murders with contaminated DNA swabs. The duct tape was on the kids skull, if it didn't leave any DNA i'd be suprised

@Marion Harris

They messed Casey up and so I really don’t think they would have fared any better with Caylee, sure they wouldn’t have killed her but I doubt she wouldn’t be fucked up.

@azsuter first of all people can and are prosecuted with circumstantial evidence. Every day. Nor do you need a body. This crazy chick is NOT innocent.

in your eyes thats what that means. But these jurors need to quit being coaxed by prosecutors into finding an assailant to put these crimes at ease when no evidence exists. This is all cirmonstancial and not hard evidence. People forget that they need to prove "without a reason of doubt" before finding people guilty. Shame to those that use their option on the case at hand. It is the states job to prove without a shadow of a doubt otherwise. QUIT BEING A PART OF THROWING INNOCENT PEOPLE IN JAIL!!! idts

I think Caylee's murder was in part an expression of aggression towards Casey's parents.

I think Caylee's murder was in part an expression of aggression towards Casey's parents.

@ashton williams What goes around, comes around!

@ashton williams What goes around, comes around!

But tgen the attention eould have been on her daughter and she will not luve like that

But tgen the attention eould have been on her daughter and she will not luve like that

@Angie T Casey has joined the conversation.

@Angie T Casey has joined the conversation.

She is so distorted! And yes being a Grandma Her parents would do anything for her Granddaughter's Life which unfortunately Casey did not value LIFE!

@tiffymarieseesthetea marie Not another one .. sigh - read the comment I was responding to.

@tiffymarieseesthetea marie Not another one .. sigh - read the comment I was responding to.

@Villanelle so? She still obviously killed her. What mom sits around for 30 days when there kid is missing and they dont know were she is. Like if my son cant he found for 2 seconds I'm freaking out. So ummm yeah. And u can tell she doesnt care because of how she is talking to 911...then she lies about were Casey is and takes the cops on a wild run around to nothing and no nanny. It's all lies. Odor in the trunk too. And then Casey is found right now the block from her home.

@wonbadood right?! How could she betray her father with such a lie???

@wonbadood right?! How could she betray her father with such a lie???

Someone fact check me on this, but it sounds like Casey's father paid for a defense attorney to spin up a tale about him molesting his own daughter so she could get away with murder. <br>Parent of the year award, right there...

Someone fact check me on this, but it sounds like Casey's father paid for a defense attorney to spin up a tale about him molesting his own daughter so she could get away with murder.
Parent of the year award, right there...

The sad thing is  those type of parents are the ones who thought that their child could do no wrong and now their child is in this MESS and I believe they know their daughter killed their grandchild!!!

@globalcitizenn Probably lied to keep her alive and this was done probably under the counsel of the defense attorney. That would account for the lack of emotional tell.

@Villanelle They. needed to know how she died, it was clear that she wasn't drowned in the swamp she was only dumped there. So what they needed to do was check how she died, look for and test the body of water that she likely died in and have that as evidence and make up their case as they go. You need a certain amount of deductive thinking to make a good case, something the prosecution was sadly lacking.

the mom was just as delusional about her daughter.. i remember when this all happened; someone close to the family made a statement in a writeup about this case that two years prior, there had been a family wedding, casey looked pregnant to her and asked casey Anthony's mother about it and she denied denied denied, even stating that her daughter was a virgin...

wonbadood Was the father abusing her story true? Her father didn’t seem to have any shock or reaction to it..

Casey hated her parents. She wanted to hurt them too. She got Narcissistic supply from that. She got supply from killing her daughter and feeling powerful. Beating the justice system would’ve given her the biggest rush of all.

Yeah she really should not have been a mom.

Yeah she really should not have been a mom.

@Villanelle yeah sorry, I was in a very bad mood .

@Villanelle yeah sorry, I was in a very bad mood .

@Joe Felony what tf are you talking about

@Joe Felony what tf are you talking about

@Joe Felony If you look at the comment I  was originally replying to - that was the only reason I left mine. Jeez... 🙄 Calm down to a frenzy, will ya?

@Villanelle why would you quote something if you don’t believe in it? Either own it or take back your words.

@Joe Felony I was simply stating something which was mentioned in the video.

@Joe Felony I was simply stating something which was mentioned in the video.

@wonbadood There was no DNA found on the duct tape. Neither hers or her daughters.

@wonbadood There was no DNA found on the duct tape. Neither hers or her daughters.

Her parents loved and cherished little Caylee...they most definitely would have taken custody of the little angel ..

Or even the best friend, this whole thing is a sad tragedy. Hope this little girl gets the justice she deserves one day.

and it’s so clear she loved the power of being able to say no, that’s why she didn’t give Caylee to them

and it’s so clear she loved the power of being able to say no, that’s why she didn’t give Caylee to them


The pain in Cindy's voice. How devastating.


this video has by far more raw Casey footage than any other video ive seen on the topic. you're right, it is absurd.


i feel so bad for the grandparents, they try so hard and they love their daughter so much


im so suprised with what ppl can get away with, with good lawyers


"Dear Diary, today I killed my kid."

Jury - "This could mean anything really."

"Dear Diary, today I killed my kid."

Jury - "This could mean anything really."

@Raccman it just means there wasn't enough evidence. You can know in your gut the person is guilty but that does not mean anything. Innocent until proven guilty. You don't have to prove you're innocent but prosecutors have to prove guilt. In this case they can prove she is a lying wack job but can't prove she was guilty of murder. That's why you don't take a case to court with nothing but speculation and circumstantial evidence, because a guilty person might walk away. They needed some hard evidence to prove she was the one who committed the murder and they had none. Like blood on clothes/ tire tracks of her car at the scene/ match the tears on the roll of duct tape in her house. something. In the eyes of the law this girl is innocent and that's all that really matters. There is only one thing worse than a guilty person getting away with it and that is an innocent person getting thrown in jail for life. That's why there has to be no doubt with the evidence given.

@Hayles being found not guilty doesn't mean you didn't do it, just look at OJ simpson.

@Hayles being found not guilty doesn't mean you didn't do it, just look at OJ simpson.

@Raccman found innocent in the courtroom.

@Raccman found innocent in the courtroom.

@Hayles Imagine simping for a woman who murdered her child.

@Hayles Imagine simping for a woman who murdered her child.

@Elle Zuck She didn't write "I'm glad my kid is dead". It was more along the lines of "I made a big decision and I won't doubt my decision" Yes, that could actually mean anything. Also, don't look at my search history. That's some scary shit. I'm confident you would find the weirdest most bizarre searches if you looked at anyone's search history. Like maybe she just watched a murder mystery TV show and was wondering if there was a way to suffocate someone without it being traced.. just for fun. Like I might search "how long until a body decomposes completely" or "Does an icicle make an untraceable murder weapon?" " can suffocation be traced if you don't squeeze or cause bruises around the neck?" "Duct tape suffocation, is that traceable?" hmmm, there is no physical damage to the body. Can it still be traced? I'm about to google if suffocation with duct tape leaves traceable cause of death.  does not mean I'm going to kill someone. Her searching that does not make her look good but it isn't proof of anything. Like, match the tear in the duck tape to the roll in her drawer at home and now we have something. Find her car tire tracks in the sand where the body was dumped. Find physical proof of a body decomposing in the trunk of her car (you know they searched that car and must have found nothing, there is no way they didn't search that car.) Find literally anything linking her physically to the murder. They had nothing but speculation. Speculation combined with physical evidence drives a convincing case, not just speculation alone. Like the guy said at the end, we can sit here all day and talk about what might have happened but that isn't proof of anything.

Too bad that is not actually what she wrote. That's why they couldn't use that in court.

Too bad that is not actually what she wrote. That's why they couldn't use that in court.

@TheRealM00 The Original if your gonna pick on Americans make sure your spelling is correct my guy.

@TheRealM00 The Original if your gonna pick on Americans make sure your spelling is correct my guy.

@TheRealM00 The Original lol absolutely not, after living in the Uk for 2 years I can confidently say almost every British government institution is totally backwards. The US is way sharper.

@TheRealM00 The Original lol absolutely not, after living in the Uk for 2 years I can confidently say almost every British government institution is totally backwards. The US is way sharper.

it's baffling really, maybe they couldn't link her to "homicide" or "manslaughter", but "child abuse" come on.

it's baffling really, maybe they couldn't link her to "homicide" or "manslaughter", but "child abuse" come on.

@The Ikon Channel Regardless of Interpretation, when your own child has been missing for days and you say that you're having the happiest day of your life, there is little to no room for alternate Interpretations. No person (with an average degree of sense) would admit to murder unequivocally even in their diary. To expect such a thing is ludicrous.

@Abdulkader Khojema she apparently didn't know the who the father was...

@Abdulkader Khojema she apparently didn't know the who the father was...

@AMEER Because Alanis Morrisette killed her kid, unfortunately.😰

@AMEER Because Alanis Morrisette killed her kid, unfortunately.😰

1:24
But why show a pic of Alanis Morrisette?

1:24
But why show a pic of Alanis Morrisette?

The jury decided that the 'kid' she killed was a goat.

The jury decided that the 'kid' she killed was a goat.

@Suzanne Vaine I am aware. Glad you agree.
.
.
.
🤦

@Suzanne Vaine I am aware. Glad you agree.
.
.
.
🤦

She could be talking about her inner child. Maybe it’s metaphorical.
Think about it. You could be sending an innocent person to jail 🤪

LMFAO, I can’t believe this BS.

She could be talking about her inner child. Maybe it’s metaphorical.
Think about it. You could be sending an innocent person to jail 🤪

LMFAO, I can’t believe this BS.

She was just happy she learned how suffocate in such a foolproof nature

She was just happy she learned how suffocate in such a foolproof nature

@J. Bivens juries are not selected by one random person 👍🏼

@J. Bivens juries are not selected by one random person 👍🏼

@Mister Beef Wellington The 3rd those books are actually about another psycho girl named Emily Elizabeth who sees giant dogs that arent there

@Mister Beef Wellington The 3rd those books are actually about another psycho girl named Emily Elizabeth who sees giant dogs that arent there

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL It’s so nice being white

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL It’s so nice being white

@Elle Zuck by your logic, I have a rock that keeps tigers away. Know how it works? Well ive got a rock and there aren't any tigers around, so ta-da! It works only $1000 bucks today only,

@Elle Zuck by your logic, I have a rock that keeps tigers away. Know how it works? Well ive got a rock and there aren't any tigers around, so ta-da! It works only $1000 bucks today only,

They really failed that little baby. Rest In Peace Caylee

They really failed that little baby. Rest In Peace Caylee

@Fuck YouTube Thanks. Im really flattered. To be honest, I couldnt have done it without you. Each & everyone of my loyal fans is responsible that Im here today were I am.
First & foremost I wanna thank Jesus & God, which are great friends of mine. Also thank you aunt Carol Ann for buying me my first ever pencil. I still have it to this day. Mind, its only a little stump these days but I still use it to write via an pencil extender.
Im actually headed to a book signing  event to sign books for blind people. Since my publisher is very kind & decided to print my book also in the writings for the blind.

Agsin thanks for your inspiring words. I love it when fans write me personally. God bless you ❤

@Mister Beef Wellington The 3rd <br>probably one of the worst analogies I've ever seen

@Mister Beef Wellington The 3rd
probably one of the worst analogies I've ever seen

@blyt50 my comment was just in direct response to the one posted, that implied it said it and was a confession.

@blyt50 my comment was just in direct response to the one posted, that implied it said it and was a confession.

@SkyTheSuperIntendent It's all in relativity. It never said she didn't kill her kid either.

@SkyTheSuperIntendent It's all in relativity. It never said she didn't kill her kid either.

Her father was a police officer (there is curruption amongst all ranks) even if her father wanted her in jail, I think he still had something to do with this. The boys in blue never betray each other. She deserves to rot in PRISON not JAIL.

Dear diary, today I commuted the worst crime a parent could commit.

Jury: ( picks nose )

Dear diary, today I commuted the worst crime a parent could commit.

Jury: ( picks nose )

@Kai K. her car also smelled of death, and she was emotionless and unconcerned, she preferred to smoke weed with her boyfriend instead of calling the cops or actually looking, she had the shittyest prosecutors

Baez: Sure, this might be a confession — but did the state <b>prove</b> it was a confession?

Baez: Sure, this might be a confession — but did the state *prove* it was a confession?

someone call Phoenix Wright or Makoto in here smh

someone call Phoenix Wright or Makoto in here smh

Never skip jury duty. Because Karen will go, and there are a lot of them.

Never skip jury duty. Because Karen will go, and there are a lot of them.

@esther fisher i never said she wasnt guilty. Just stating the fact that her diary is NOT a confession like the original comment was trying to say.

@esther fisher i never said she wasnt guilty. Just stating the fact that her diary is NOT a confession like the original comment was trying to say.

@treylem3 Though you’re correct, In my mind, as mine opinion,I think that is a STUPID rule. Really, also when some obvious cases gets dismissed by a technicality, and then they can take the case up again, and just fixing that technical problem/.
There are often things within the law that doesn’t make sense to me, but it does to the defence lawyers, they must understand something I don’t.
I am actually having trouble with the hole case getting thrown out because of some technical issues also.

Unreal.. her being free is unbelievably stupid. How the heck she didn't even get any convicted and just got away with murder. -_- i wonder if those people behind this investigation, the jury and whoever involved in the shitty part of the case can live their life peacefully after that.

@TheRealM00 The Original see... those points are better. But u could not convict her based on the diary entries. My point was the diary entries dont suggest she murdered someone. I was only refering to the diary entries. Like the original comment was. Dum dum.

@SkyTheSuperIntendent - car smells like a dead body

- google search about suffocating a child

- journal hinting it

- misleads the cops

- lies about everything

- didn’t report a missing child

- doesn’t show any emotions towards her kid

Jury: seems normal to me

@Susanne Collins - car smells like a dead body

- google search about suffocating a child

- journal hinting it

- misleads the cops

- lies about everything

- didn’t report a missing child

- doesn’t show any emotions towards her kid

Jury: seems normal to me

@Celery Towers. First, that’s not all they had.  Second, I wouldn’t ask for death in this case.  That is just one of the possible punishments.  You would agree that she should’ve been found guilty, but you just wouldn’t put her to death?  I can go along with that.

@Nicholas Price we are talking about the death penalty though, internet searches or diary entries should not be enough to put someone to death

@Nicholas Price we are talking about the death penalty though, internet searches or diary entries should not be enough to put someone to death

This kind of nonsense is why so many other countries don't leave such decisions to some jury of random civilians. I still don't understand <i>why the heck</i> America does this, to this day.

This kind of nonsense is why so many other countries don't leave such decisions to some jury of random civilians. I still don't understand _why the heck_ America does this, to this day.

@TheRealM00 The Original the UK? Idk about that. And if she was found guilty of murder 1 she’d get maybe 10 years.

@TheRealM00 The Original the UK? Idk about that. And if she was found guilty of murder 1 she’d get maybe 10 years.

I still can't believe there wasn't one voice of reason among that jury. Just someone saying, "Look, even if the girl drowned and it was an accident, why wouldn't the mother call an ambulance instead of duct taping her daughter and hiding her dead body? Why would she google about suffocation before the girl died? Why would she party after her daughter died? We know she is a pathological liar, so she will deny everything. There's no doubt she killed her daughter". Had the standards in this case been held, the only way to prove a crime would be having a video of it

@Elle Zuck on point! Although Medias make her looks like she was starving !

@Elle Zuck on point! Although Medias make her looks like she was starving !

Taken out of context btw watch ZL’s documentary on this

Taken out of context btw watch ZL’s documentary on this

Hah, funny comment xD.

Though I would hope an Entry in a diary alone would not be enough to convict

Hah, funny comment xD.

Though I would hope an Entry in a diary alone would not be enough to convict

@Lukas Goza Dumb luck? OJ had a dream team conducting his defence and the prosecution completely dropped the ball.

@Lukas Goza Dumb luck? OJ had a dream team conducting his defence and the prosecution completely dropped the ball.

@SkyTheSuperIntendent He’s just pointing out (by way of joke) that even if she confessed he thinks that jury would have given her a pass.

@SkyTheSuperIntendent He’s just pointing out (by way of joke) that even if she confessed he thinks that jury would have given her a pass.

@Mad Max Numerous defendants have been found guilty with the prosecution’s case only consisting of circumstantial evidence. In relation to your last sentence :
That’s exactly how the justice system works in the US... with the most influential of all being the government themselves.
Edit : Criminal trials are a game of roulette.

this is what blows my mind the most her diary was literally like ‘hey i’m free to live today (the day my daughter went missing- no correlation btw) it was a hard decision but yolo’

this is what blows my mind the most her diary was literally like ‘hey i’m free to live today (the day my daughter went missing- no correlation btw) it was a hard decision but yolo’

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL i thought it was the Patriarch thingy, but i guess it doesn't apply here...

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL i thought it was the Patriarch thingy, but i guess it doesn't apply here...

@Elle Zuck Because on the diary she doesn't mention why she is happy. She doesn't say it is the Buritto!

@Elle Zuck Because on the diary she doesn't mention why she is happy. She doesn't say it is the Buritto!

@Ethan of the Internet Sure they did.  The fact that even the people claiming that they didn’t meet the burden of proof knows she guilty proves it.  Baez manipulated and duped the jury into a false definition of ‘reasonable doubt’.

@Nicholas Price I'm not arguing that I wanted her to get off or that she didn't kill her kid. I think she did it. I'm pointing out that, legally, they couldn't meet the burden of proof for first-degree murder. They should have charged her with things that didn't require them to prove that she caused the death.

@Ethan of the Internet And?  Why cover up the death of your child, go on a 5-week bender, write about how happy you are in your diary while you’re ‘trying’ to look for her, get a tattoo commemorating your ‘beautiful life’ while ‘trying’ to look for your child, and not say a single truthful thing to the police once you’re caught…you know, if you’re innocent?  It doesn’t matter what the exact cause of death is.  If I kill someone, but I do a fantastic job of destroying the body where you don’t know how the person died, do I get off on the charges automatically?  That’s just a terrible standard.

@Nicholas Price The prosecution failed to establish how Caylee Anthony died, which is pretty important if you're trying to prove that she killed her child, intentionally or otherwise.

@Nicholas Price The prosecution failed to establish how Caylee Anthony died, which is pretty important if you're trying to prove that she killed her child, intentionally or otherwise.

@Ethan of the Internet that’s not how this works.  It’s not a debate where the judges pick which side does better.  Is she guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?  The entire world knows she’s guilty.  You don’t let a mommy murderer go free because you think ‘the prosecution sucked.’  They were manipulated and duped by the defense lawyer and are embarrassed about it.  They should be.  That’s the long and short of it.

The jury has all said they wanted to find her guilty, but the prosecution sucked, so they couldn't. That's the long and short of it.

The jury has all said they wanted to find her guilty, but the prosecution sucked, so they couldn't. That's the long and short of it.

Yep, and what a crappy use of a tattoo as well, she obviously wasn't concerned about killing her kid at all.

Yep, and what a crappy use of a tattoo as well, she obviously wasn't concerned about killing her kid at all.

@Mad Max just no.  It is not imperative to have ‘concrete’ evidence.  You don’t have to have a picture or video of the crime, nor DNA or fingerprints on the murder weapon.  That is clearly not the standard.

@Kelton Foster I remember this case and followed it closely. This girl never showed any remorse. Her phone conversations with her parents were available to the jurors. They had plenty of evidence to convict. False statements and obstruction when she was questioned originally. Forensic science determined there human remains her her cars trunk. That's when she was arrested.

The jury must not have been provided all the evidence and must feel like the case should be thrown out on them not having all the pertinent evidence to convict but seeing this especially with the internet searches it doesn't leave any doubt.

legal system is broken when this sort thing happens. It is clear the jurors in this case were complete idiots

legal system is broken when this sort thing happens. It is clear the jurors in this case were complete idiots

booh Bah actually the top-rated comment ;)

booh Bah actually the top-rated comment ;)

@Mad Max well that’s the difference. It depends on who u are in America. If it was a POC this case probably would’ve been shut almost immediately and the court would’ve convicted

@Mad Max well that’s the difference. It depends on who u are in America. If it was a POC this case probably would’ve been shut almost immediately and the court would’ve convicted

@V -yrz not American just from Florida maybe 🤔

@V -yrz not American just from Florida maybe 🤔

That's called circumstantial evidence. It helps but by itself, it doesn't prove beyond reasonable doubt that she's guilty. Emphasis on "beyond a reasonable doubt". They need concrete evidence admissible to the court during the trial, which they don't have. That's why the jury is forced to declare her innocent. Criminal justice can't be judged by someone's appearance of being guilty. They must be proven guilty or else the US would become some shithole where someone can get someone else punished just by being more influential than the other guy.

How in the hell is she not in jail...blows my mind that they found her not guilty. 🤯

How in the hell is she not in jail...blows my mind that they found her not guilty. 🤯

@Kittensss you just called the Justice system in America is fair? LOL I Mean maybe you can say it is slightly fair towards White people but that’s about it-

@Kittensss you just called the Justice system in America is fair? LOL I Mean maybe you can say it is slightly fair towards White people but that’s about it-

@Lukas Goza u realize the REASON OJ was found not guilty is because of white privilege… the entire case turned from the murder of his wife to racism and prejudice in the police force. Multiple jurors said they would have refused to find him guilty due to the overwhelming evidence of racist cops dealing with OJ and the case

@longbowman I mean at least u demonstrated u dont understand white privilege

@longbowman I mean at least u demonstrated u dont understand white privilege

@fieldy409 That's the 6th amendment right to a jury of your peers. In this case, it was a random person who made a horrible decision getting a jury of random people who made a horrible decision.

@fieldy409 That's the 6th amendment right to a jury of your peers. In this case, it was a random person who made a horrible decision getting a jury of random people who made a horrible decision.

@fieldy409 100 % agree. "aight we got some guy, he allegedly did a bunch of serously fucked up shit. now who gets to decide whether we kill him or not? how about a bunch of random dudes lmao idgaf"

@fieldy409 100 % agree. "aight we got some guy, he allegedly did a bunch of serously fucked up shit. now who gets to decide whether we kill him or not? how about a bunch of random dudes lmao idgaf"

The Jury concept always seemed dumb to me. Here's a random assortment of citizens with no qualifications deciding peoples fate. They should need to have some sort of law degree to be making decisions about peoples futures like that.

@Luzilyo Stormchild No way. Maya would've been like, "Jesus Chris, I just saw everything she did... not only can we not represent her, we need to make sure the only lawyer she can get is brain damaged.".

@Luzilyo Stormchild No way. Maya would've been like, "Jesus Chris, I just saw everything she did... not only can we not represent her, we need to make sure the only lawyer she can get is brain damaged.".

There's an article with a jury member who, 10 years later, "regrets" not at least finding her guilty of "manslaughter". Are you SERIOUS!? If any jury should be super worried about their names getting out.... it's this jury. Just how!?

@Luzilyo Stormchild <br>You can't just accuse me of joke murder so casually, you know. You'll be hearing from my lawyer, Winston Payne, over those slanderous accusations.

@Luzilyo Stormchild
You can't just accuse me of joke murder so casually, you know. You'll be hearing from my lawyer, Winston Payne, over those slanderous accusations.

@Mythos Infinite way to ruin my joke man, thanks, appreciate it.

@Mythos Infinite way to ruin my joke man, thanks, appreciate it.

@Luzilyo Stormchild <br>If Wright was her defense, he would have purposely failed to get her arrested.

@Luzilyo Stormchild
If Wright was her defense, he would have purposely failed to get her arrested.

The jury had to have been bought. Worst jury in history.

The jury had to have been bought. Worst jury in history.

@V -yrz or mayb eyou mentione dme on purpose if sop wtf are you trying to say hahaha?

@V -yrz or mayb eyou mentione dme on purpose if sop wtf are you trying to say hahaha?

@SkyTheSuperIntendent sorry i just keep running into americans, quit a lot of them opver the age of 40 acting and sounding like kids.  and sorry to be so stereotypical about it but its too true sadly

@SkyTheSuperIntendent sorry i just keep running into americans, quit a lot of them opver the age of 40 acting and sounding like kids.  and sorry to be so stereotypical about it but its too true sadly

could have been referring to the family goat🤷🏿♀

could have been referring to the family goat🤷🏿♀

@TheRealM00 The Original Her "suffocation" research was found out a year later her verdict. Aren't you paying attention to the videos you watch? For saying BS like that, you are way worse than an American with a 5minute attention span. You must be BRITISH

@Elle Zuck I am sorry to break your "bulletproof" logic, but there is a possibility for everything... If the kid really died by accident, the big decision Casey was talking about could have been that of disposing of the body. I have researched stats about suicides and poisons and killing methods many times, but that certainly doesn't make me a killer. Also, those internet searches were found in 2012, which is 1 year after her verdict. You may have written on your diary that you finally ate the burrito, but she never wrote that she finally "killed her daughter". Something that vague can't be considered as a confession.

The jury was composed of English teachers who find meaning in a poem where the author messed up the spelling.

The jury was composed of English teachers who find meaning in a poem where the author messed up the spelling.

Jury - "this could mean she killed a baby goat!"

Jury - "this could mean she killed a baby goat!"

@Sonya Harris huh... odd... seems u misinterpreted what i said.

@Sonya Harris huh... odd... seems u misinterpreted what i said.

@Carolyn Lowe i never said she was innocent. I was just saying that her diary never said she killed her kid.

@Carolyn Lowe i never said she was innocent. I was just saying that her diary never said she killed her kid.

@SkyTheSuperIntendent likely over the act of murder itself.

@SkyTheSuperIntendent likely over the act of murder itself.

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL OJ Simpson he was guilty but the glove didn't fit. no white privilege, just dumb luck.

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL OJ Simpson he was guilty but the glove didn't fit. no white privilege, just dumb luck.

@Bailey Harrison Nope,...Double Jeopardy....  Once tried for 1st degree murder, you can't be re-tried for the same, or lesser, crime pertaining to the same case., ie., manslaughter., they cannot even charge her. It would have to be a more serious charge, and I don't know of one.

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL first time watching anything like this? Because the grand majority of them are white and are locked behind bars

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL first time watching anything like this? Because the grand majority of them are white and are locked behind bars

Wait...who was Cailey's father? How was that never mentioned? Why did she divorce?

Wait...who was Cailey's father? How was that never mentioned? Why did she divorce?

@Elle Zuck The prosecution team was pretty shitty to be honest. They didnt point ANY of this out in their closing statements. Just rambled on a about a motive, and you cant PROVE a motive. They CAN prove that Caylee was suffocated and they CAN prove that Casey looked up how to suffocate and they CAN prove that Casey wrote about some huge decision made after the alleged murder date. Regardless of evidence. Shitty prosecution + REALLY GOOD defense = Free Casey Anthony.

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL nice one, lmfao, why didn't i think of that?

@AZIA SEITCHER-HAMEL nice one, lmfao, why didn't i think of that?

@TheRealM00 The Original its a figure of speech dum dum.

@TheRealM00 The Original its a figure of speech dum dum.

@SkyTheSuperIntendent i tend toi have 20 20 all the time, would make a great detective no doubt, but screw that the laws let me down countless times

@SkyTheSuperIntendent i tend toi have 20 20 all the time, would make a great detective no doubt, but screw that the laws let me down countless times

@TheRealM00 The Original also. Hindsight is 2020

@TheRealM00 The Original also. Hindsight is 2020

@TheRealM00 The Original i never said she was innocent just that what was written in her diary could not be connected to anything without context. It has no obvious connections if u dont know the story or from the view point of the jury, it is possible she was talking about something else. (And jesus christ u went right for the throat didnt u. Why attack who i am? Being american has nothing to do with anything)

@TheRealM00 The Original yes we can all see the connection.

@TheRealM00 The Original yes we can all see the connection.

@SkyTheSuperIntendent you cant see the obvious  connection? you must be american to? what was it otherwise then? what about googling suffocation? do you think she was innocent?

@SkyTheSuperIntendent you cant see the obvious  connection? you must be american to? what was it otherwise then? what about googling suffocation? do you think she was innocent?

It isn't uncommon to be called to be a  juror. It takes being as smart as a box of rocks for them not to dismiss you.

It isn't uncommon to be called to be a  juror. It takes being as smart as a box of rocks for them not to dismiss you.

Id didnt even say that tho... all her diary said was "this is the happiesy ive been". No mention of caylee... or killing anything.

Id didnt even say that tho... all her diary said was "this is the happiesy ive been". No mention of caylee... or killing anything.

@Luzilyo Stormchild More like Von Karma, But just like Phoenix to find a way to blame on someone else XD.

@Luzilyo Stormchild More like Von Karma, But just like Phoenix to find a way to blame on someone else XD.

she must have had phoenix wright as her defense lmao

she must have had phoenix wright as her defense lmao

Her saying she went through with a big decision and is relieved from it mixed the very specific Internet searches of information of how her daughter was murdered should be enough evidence in my opinion. Let’s put it in a different scenario that people don’t go to jail for.  If you search how to steal someone’s burrito and how it plays out and thennn wrote in your diary saying you are so happy you finally ate and went through with a decision and the burrito is found to be proven eaten, everyone would say you ate it case closed. There’s nobody else in the world that wanted that burrito to be eaten, nobody even had access to the burrito except the person who did that search and wrote that down. How is that not enough evidence or even considered to be a CONFESSION. (Disclaimer: Absolutely not comparing a child’s death to a burrito just do not want to use a disturbing metaphor and one that is more of a non serious matter and something more ‘relatable’ so somebody who isn’t even trained in investigation will be able to judge the conclusion as guilty and understand why it’s such blatant evidence.)

Diaries are often not admissible as evidence unto itself.

Diaries are often not admissible as evidence unto itself.

Such as: "Today my dear kid had diarrhea & it killed me" lol
I just love how people always interpret something thats not even there.
Just like people reading books or watch a movie.
" bet they would even interpret things into a childrens book Clifford the big red dog.
On first glance it may seem that its about a dog & his adventures but its actually a in depth analysis of the canine psyche. LMAO XD

It just means that she made a salad with the vegetables she was growing. Duh.

It just means that she made a salad with the vegetables she was growing. Duh.


The fact that she did not seek help from anyone to find her daughter for 1 month and yet got time to get tattoo which mean "Beautiful life" speaks a lot. I really don't get how the defending prosecutors can be so cold though they deep down know who is guilty. This the most baffling judgement


HOLD UP 🖐🏼 the nanny goes by “xannie” for short 😂 you can’t make this shit up. There definitely were xannies involved in this nightmare but not in the form of a nanny lmao.

Highly likely she gave the kids xannies and it’s her sick little joke to reference the kids death “she’s with xanny the nanny”


The way Casey’s lawyer dropped like 3 major bombs out of nowhere that made no sense had me rewinding to see if I heard all of that properly


Started to watch, and was reading all the case reports, autopsy report and wiki articles. Then i read that she was walking free. I am unable to watch this video more than first 4 minutes.