I can’t believe I spent 1 hour to end up pissed as fuck. This whole case is ridiculous, unbelievable. I’m disgusted.

I can’t believe I spent 1 hour to end up pissed as fuck. This whole case is ridiculous, unbelievable. I’m disgusted.

I’m 13 minutes in and I’m already horrified. I’m scared to watch the full thing

I’m 13 minutes in and I’m already horrified. I’m scared to watch the full thing

@Mercmad there´s no other killer out there. They admited, they wittnesed the child´s death in the pool. So she basicaly confessed she put her child´s body in that swamp..I believe that duct tape should be key evidence, there is no reason to choke dead body.

I made it up to 56:25 and realized she was going to walk free. genuinely can't watch anymore. i'm horrified at the world and especially at the american justice system.

Oy gevalt Schlomo! I nearly spat out my matzo brei when the jury gave their verdict. Patooie!

Oy gevalt Schlomo! I nearly spat out my matzo brei when the jury gave their verdict. Patooie!

@DeathnoteBB you’d have to be like Amish or something to have missed this

@DeathnoteBB you’d have to be like Amish or something to have missed this

@Marko Bighead Weed isn’t gonna cause destruction of anything… it’s weed.

@Marko Bighead Weed isn’t gonna cause destruction of anything… it’s weed.

@Growing with Anastasia Same… I was at most a teenager when this happened with no interest in true crime and <i>I</i> heard of it. It was the most controversial case at the time.

@Growing with Anastasia Same… I was at most a teenager when this happened with no interest in true crime and _I_ heard of it. It was the most controversial case at the time.

This just shows how a  good attorney can get you to escape even the most evil deeds.

This just shows how a  good attorney can get you to escape even the most evil deeds.

@Bag Tv If it has been someone of color or someone poor or unattractive she would be in jail. It’s really unfair.

@Bag Tv If it has been someone of color or someone poor or unattractive she would be in jail. It’s really unfair.

@Andie Crayons They're making me feel ancient. I'm less than 3 years younger than Casey so I was an adult too. I remember this case blasted everywhere. There was nothing so widely publicized since Jon Bennet (and I was a kid for that one ).

@Ukraino TV You sound  obsessed and afraid of people affiliated with a particular political party in the United States. Please seek help with a mental health professional in your area or online as soon as possible. Cult behavior always leads to violence..

fantastic example that women can get away with anything in court

fantastic example that women can get away with anything in court

Now i don’t want to watch it anymore :(( ugh!

Now i don’t want to watch it anymore :(( ugh!

@Bag Tv i love this argument so much, 15 years over some weed! Without mentioning it was "some" kilograms, with the intention to distribute, in an US state with 3 strike laws while the convicted was already sentenced twice for drug dealing...

BUT MUH 15 YEARS FOR WHEAT

It was HER baby , she made it . SHe was free to do as she pleased.

It was HER baby , she made it . SHe was free to do as she pleased.

same brother, one hour and pissed as fucked.

same brother, one hour and pissed as fucked.

@Saksham she's that kind of a cold-blooded killer who will soon murder her parents and then again like in this case gets away with it.

@Saksham she's that kind of a cold-blooded killer who will soon murder her parents and then again like in this case gets away with it.

@Azel Joy Portugues Just watch it. It shows how many loopholes are there in the justice system.

@Azel Joy Portugues Just watch it. It shows how many loopholes are there in the justice system.

Really? Now I don't want finish this video anymore

Really? Now I don't want finish this video anymore

Same bro same. I am literally crying like wtf

Same bro same. I am literally crying like wtf

You forget that not everyone is fron the US

You forget that not everyone is fron the US

Its more than frustrating. Because they couldn't get enough evidence to jail her. And they knew full well she had an involvement in it.

Its more than frustrating. Because they couldn't get enough evidence to jail her. And they knew full well she had an involvement in it.

People already forgot about her? When I was in school she was everywhere

People already forgot about her? When I was in school she was everywhere

@Puchowska She attended a rally to protest Trump, go figure.

@Puchowska She attended a rally to protest Trump, go figure.

I know all about this case and still watched it. I wanna do so much damage to her it’s crazy. I still can’t believe she got away with this when there are people sitting in prison who are innocent snd was convicted with WAY less evidence!

@Bag Tv If it's 15+ years I doubt it was just "some weed".

@Bag Tv If it's 15+ years I doubt it was just "some weed".

imagine how it felt seeing the case unfold live and the majority of america knowing shes guilty and then the jury saying not guilty. the jury even got death threats for it

@Growing with Anastasia Me too.  This was a top news story for years!  Are these people living under a rock?

@Growing with Anastasia Me too.  This was a top news story for years!  Are these people living under a rock?

@Novascotia Skater It did.  So whatever they planned worked.

@Novascotia Skater It did.  So whatever they planned worked.

Yes it's disgusting but completely fascinating and unbelievable.

Yes it's disgusting but completely fascinating and unbelievable.

That's what you get with a ridiculous system such as jury trial in place. The side whose lawyer is the better liar and manipulator wins

That's what you get with a ridiculous system such as jury trial in place. The side whose lawyer is the better liar and manipulator wins

@Saira _ thanks for the heads up. I’m hooked in now and have to finish. Even though I’ll spend the rest of the day wound up. Just hope she gets her comeuppance one day. 🇬🇧

That’s a good summary for every case on this channel and how I myself are left feeling.

That’s a good summary for every case on this channel and how I myself are left feeling.

@Susanne Collins I don't know anything about anything but this makes a lot of sense. I know the burden of evidence has to be the same for a death sentence as it is for a life sentence, but I just know that me personally, I'd not be able to convict someone to death unless I absolutely knew for a fact they did this heinous crime. I feel pretty strongly that she did it. Idk if I feel strongly enough to be the one signing her death warrant. I'd send her to prison for life tho—if I'm wrong they'll appeal it and it'll come out at some point. But I know that's fallacious and the bar must be the same.

Same here! I almost end up crying for the poor kid

Same here! I almost end up crying for the poor kid

The special on Hulu where they cover this case is just as upsetting, if not more. The justice system is so broken.

The special on Hulu where they cover this case is just as upsetting, if not more. The justice system is so broken.

you guys didnt know that before watching? this case was huge all over the news in the entire countru

you guys didnt know that before watching? this case was huge all over the news in the entire countru

@el SunShine and the prosecution shouldn’t have went for the death penalty when they couldn’t say how or where she died- they offered chloroform and the tape as different options but…🤷🏻♀

Ha, I literally just said the exact same thing.

Ha, I literally just said the exact same thing.

apparently people are throwing drinks in her face at a local bar LAWL

apparently people are throwing drinks in her face at a local bar LAWL

That’s how we all felt while watching the story unfold. I knew she was guilty on day 1. The fact they didn’t find her guilty was shocking.

That’s how we all felt while watching the story unfold. I knew she was guilty on day 1. The fact they didn’t find her guilty was shocking.

Casey Anthony is disgusting and ridiculous as a so called mother and the jury was dumb enough to believe the BS story her and her lawyer made up to get her off when she is as guilty as hell. No mother would lie and allow their child to go missing for a month and not call the police unless they knew the child was dead and she was the one who killed her.

@Love To Be Here Sure, but courts don't work on "well we have no evidence but she, like, is just so totally obviously guilty, man". Courts exist to dole out sentencing based on the evidence. No evidence, no sentence.
If that's true, her daughter could've gotten into the pool for any number of reasons. Not every accidental child death is due to negligence, therefore this would still be circumstantial without any other details regarding the death.

Not to mention, even documented negligence often goes unpunished, usually for no reason other than pure emotion. It's very obvious that any way you slice it, the McCanns are responsible for Madeleine McCann's death through intent or sheer negligence, but since the former hasn't been proven and the latter is ignored just because of their crocodile tears, they have become millionaires thanks to their dead child even though it is a documented fact that their child disappeared or died through negligence in the absolute best case scenario.

@Marko Bighead Evidence or not it doesn't mean she's not really guilty. Besides she told her lawyer that her daughter drowned in the pool so why hasn't she been charged with negligence. And if that was really what happened then it's still her fault her daughter is dead.

@Kryzs Kornhell Didnt her lawyer say that her daughter drowned in the pool ? If so shouldn't she at least be found guilty of neglect ? And if that is the case it would still be her fault that her daughter's dead.

Shes writing a book and movie.... We gotta do something

Shes writing a book and movie.... We gotta do something

yeah im 25 minutes in and im stopping for that reason. as it kept going i knew this would only end with me being angry and upset and i didnt want that.  so sad

yeah im 25 minutes in and im stopping for that reason. as it kept going i knew this would only end with me being angry and upset and i didnt want that.  so sad

I remember when the news reported she was looking into adoption and I was sick to my stomach. Even if no agency would match her the very thought is disgusting.

I remember when the news reported she was looking into adoption and I was sick to my stomach. Even if no agency would match her the very thought is disgusting.

Same I could not belive it. According to Google she is still living in Florida and in an interview in 2019 she apparently wants to have another kid. I really hope she does not have another child. This made me so mad.

I mean if you think about it... Sure she acted really weird and lied about a lot of things. But there was no actual proof that she had killed her daughter. So in a way, I respect the judge's decision even though I probably wouldn't think that way myself if I was the judge. I just appreciate that we have people who can make objective decisions.

Not gonna lie, after about 20 minutes, i was like "this bitch is deplorable and guilty as fuck" so skipped to the end. Glad i saved myself some time, at least.

Not gonna lie, after about 20 minutes, i was like "this bitch is deplorable and guilty as fuck" so skipped to the end. Glad i saved myself some time, at least.

Yeah but that's the beauty (disgust) of our justice system there has to be evidence and they jumped the gun on this one and she got away. Also our jury is actually taking it seriously now. When the Lawyers know it's a game.

This is why I drink and smoke 2 packs a day.

This is why I drink and smoke 2 packs a day.

Just shows us how shitty the justice system is in our country.

Just shows us how shitty the justice system is in our country.

@hohoho hehehe Oh ok lol. Thanks for not just getting all salty and defensive like other people probably would

@hohoho hehehe Oh ok lol. Thanks for not just getting all salty and defensive like other people probably would

@MisterBread009 my name should give it away that I'm only on here for a bit of a laugh, but fair enough, point taken.

@MisterBread009 my name should give it away that I'm only on here for a bit of a laugh, but fair enough, point taken.

@MisterBread009 well, I must have forgotten to look into my crystal ball to find out what the future was going to bring me.

@MisterBread009 well, I must have forgotten to look into my crystal ball to find out what the future was going to bring me.

Just finished it and I feel the exact same way..

Just finished it and I feel the exact same way..

@olivia grace what in God's forsaken name is wrong with you?

@olivia grace what in God's forsaken name is wrong with you?

One hour? Bro the people who followed this case spent months praying she would be found guilty. I know I was glued to my phone waiting for a guilty verdict. Bitch got off free and I was PISSED OFF!!!!!!!!

@Growing with Anastasia some people just don't fall into the media hoopla and follow things, I never gave a crap about it and watched this video and I'm beyond pissed and confused

Wait none of you really recall this being live many many years ago none of you were following this treachery and massive twist ending in real life??!!;

Wait none of you really recall this being live many many years ago none of you were following this treachery and massive twist ending in real life??!!;

Wait... How did you not know before watching this?

Wait... How did you not know before watching this?

Yeah welcome to the club. Been disgusted for 13 years.

Yeah welcome to the club. Been disgusted for 13 years.

@Lone W wtf... wrong place, wrong time of tbis troll

@Lone W wtf... wrong place, wrong time of tbis troll

@Bag Tv make me angry af... this would be a goid reason for rioting... <br>Wtf is wring with this women and this justice system...

@Bag Tv make me angry af... this would be a goid reason for rioting...
Wtf is wring with this women and this justice system...

Amen brother... same feeling... angry af...

Amen brother... same feeling... angry af...

My thoughts exactly. No words can describe how horrified I am that this disgusting despicable excuse of a human being got let off on all accounts.

My thoughts exactly. No words can describe how horrified I am that this disgusting despicable excuse of a human being got let off on all accounts.

EXACTLY THIS WOMAN IS EVIL! Her actions were callous and calculated and she demonstrated time and time again she could care less about her own friends or more importantly her very own family. She openly murdered her daughter, expressed satisfaction in doing so, proved she is manipulative and disingenuous to everyone around her, and got away with her. I looked her up because I was so mad and apparently she lives somewhere in west palm beach and people who recognize her throw drinks at her still.

@hohoho hehehe How could I have known you were joking? I can't hear your tone and intent through my computer screen.

@hohoho hehehe How could I have known you were joking? I can't hear your tone and intent through my computer screen.

@hohoho hehehe how could you complain about spoilers when you deliberately came into the comments and read them before finishing the video??

@hohoho hehehe how could you complain about spoilers when you deliberately came into the comments and read them before finishing the video??

@MisterBread009 maybe. But I was joking. Smart arse

@MisterBread009 maybe. But I was joking. Smart arse

@Brandon Smith you should probably get out more

@Brandon Smith you should probably get out more

I’ve never been this pissed as well watching a damn YouTube video. Fucking horrible, rip Caylee

I’ve never been this pissed as well watching a damn YouTube video. Fucking horrible, rip Caylee

@Bag Tv The only people sitting in jail for that long over "some weed" are lifetime drug dealers who sell destruction to families and communities. It costs nothing to not be a drug dealer and nobody is going to prison for 15 years for smoking a joint.

@Novascotia Skater Neither is relevant. They convict based on the evidence. There was no evidence of murder, so they didn't convict her of murder. They did their job as they were supposed to.

I think the interrogators messed up. They got so pissed by her lying that they didn't setup a thing to get a confession like they do in the other videos

I think the interrogators messed up. They got so pissed by her lying that they didn't setup a thing to get a confession like they do in the other videos

@hohoho hehehe you opened the comments, that’s on u

@hohoho hehehe you opened the comments, that’s on u

Think about those people who have been following this case for 3 years.

Think about those people who have been following this case for 3 years.

@Puchowska they both “arent guilty of anything” as per the court and Trump’s denial of trials for what he’s been accused of. so how is it failed?

@Puchowska they both “arent guilty of anything” as per the court and Trump’s denial of trials for what he’s been accused of. so how is it failed?

I know. I ended up watching the trial, all police interviews of all folks interviewed etc. I spent weeks on it and I am just as angry as I was to start with lol

Me too was a waste!! Thats some bullshit she killed her daughter no doubt!

Me too was a waste!! Thats some bullshit she killed her daughter no doubt!

I like these clips but I’m a parent and I don’t like watching the ones where the kids suffer I just can’t watch it it’s to sad

I like these clips but I’m a parent and I don’t like watching the ones where the kids suffer I just can’t watch it it’s to sad

@el SunShine The only lack of evidence was the fact that no DNA or print tests were done to the tape on the dead child's head. So if she was innocent(unlikely) does that mean a sadistic killer is out there somewhere? <br>My long experience of life has taught me one thing ,the game of Courts is played by those with the most money ,those who can buy their innocence and a determination of innocence has nothing to do with the the guilt of the defendant.

@el SunShine The only lack of evidence was the fact that no DNA or print tests were done to the tape on the dead child's head. So if she was innocent(unlikely) does that mean a sadistic killer is out there somewhere?
My long experience of life has taught me one thing ,the game of Courts is played by those with the most money ,those who can buy their innocence and a determination of innocence has nothing to do with the the guilt of the defendant.

@DubHead fuck im 55 minutes in and decided to scroll down to comments now

@DubHead fuck im 55 minutes in and decided to scroll down to comments now

@Shrek 5ever actually the jury hated Casey, too. they thought she was a disgusting person and a terrible mother, but they said they simply could not say "beyond a reasonable doubt"

Thanks for the warning.  Stopped watching because else I would go insane knowing she wasn't punished.

Thanks for the warning.  Stopped watching because else I would go insane knowing she wasn't punished.

@Puchowska I didn't said he was. I said that the effect, to me, seems similar.

When the mass media picks a side, or starts demonizing a person, most folks smell the bullshit and stand opposite to it.

I remember 2016, the mass media called trump every name under the sun and he still won.

@Saira _ Isnt she not only free, but a protected citizen under the witness protection program?

@Saira _ Isnt she not only free, but a protected citizen under the witness protection program?

This is so obviously that she is guilty. WTF?!

This is so obviously that she is guilty. WTF?!

@Puchowska he was the worst president tho lol

@Puchowska he was the worst president tho lol

@Bag Tv They weren't able to connect the search history with her and with the death of her little girl.

@Bag Tv They weren't able to connect the search history with her and with the death of her little girl.

@Shrek 5ever Except Donald Trump isn't guilty of anything, so that fails as a comparison.

@Shrek 5ever Except Donald Trump isn't guilty of anything, so that fails as a comparison.

I remember hearing this verdict and being in such disbelief. This was a bigger botch than the OJ and Nicole Simpson case

I remember hearing this verdict and being in such disbelief. This was a bigger botch than the OJ and Nicole Simpson case

@Bag Tv pro tip: don’t sell pounds of weed and run around with toy guns

Or are you gonna tell me someone’s sitting in jail for a joint and a dime bag? Get your fake talking points outta here

@hohoho hehehe Maybe don't read comments and replies before you finish a video.

@hohoho hehehe Maybe don't read comments and replies before you finish a video.

She got the best lawyer in the world. Plus the media being biased against her made people think that she was being treated unfairly. It's like a "Donald Trump effect."

When the mass media starts assassinating someone's character everyday people see that as unfair and take that someone's side. Had the media kept quiet, surely she would be condemned as guilty.

These videos will do that to a morally sound person.

These videos will do that to a morally sound person.

@Lone W God bless!  Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior and died on a cross for our sins so we can live again in Heaven where there is no pain or suffering!  God is our Father and Creator and raised His Son Jesus from the dead!  Confess and repent of your sins and God will freely forgive you!  Trust in God and live for Jesus as He died for you! 💕 (don’t swear or take God’s name in vain!)

I feel the same.... I was like she is ending up in jail...n now she is free dam... What system is this

I feel the same.... I was like she is ending up in jail...n now she is free dam... What system is this

@Andie Crayons totally I am shocked people aren’t familiar with this case..?!

@Andie Crayons totally I am shocked people aren’t familiar with this case..?!

If I ever murder someone, I'm hiring this lawyer HANDS DOWN. He is awfully good at the awful thing he did, but man... those results.

If I ever murder someone, I'm hiring this lawyer HANDS DOWN. He is awfully good at the awful thing he did, but man... those results.

You guys know this massively nationally televised  case happened 10 years ago? I don't  think the no spoilers rule applies, lol.. And yeah, we are all disgusted by her. : /

Like did they not see the search history ...mean while we have people sitting in jail for 15+ years over some weed .....

Like did they not see the search history ...mean while we have people sitting in jail for 15+ years over some weed .....

Rabbi, I watched this trial in real time.

Rabbi, I watched this trial in real time.

Thanks to the comment section I saved a lot of time and disappointment...

Thanks to the comment section I saved a lot of time and disappointment...

I am now more than half way through an knowng she goes free is infuriating.

I am now more than half way through an knowng she goes free is infuriating.


I feel like the only reason Caylee is dead right now, is that Casey was used to being the center of everyones attention, and suddendly she wasn't. So she took out the competition, aka her daughter.

Edit after rewatching this again: How badly was her body decomposed? it says skeletal remains, so I'm guessing really badly. Could rape still be visible? if it's just bone, I don't think so but if there was any organic material left. Casey was at her boyfriends house, on drugs, atleast weed. Casey is the last person to see her alive, and I understood that she went to His boyfriends, since they were filmed together soon after. But what if it was Her boyfriend who sexually assaulted Caylee and killed Her? Ducktape on the mouth and nose to keep her from screaming and thus dying? Casey isn't right in the head, but I don't know enough to know if this possibility was investigated, since everyone jumped on Casey being responsible (she still is, but to what), which is understandable. But if she was at the boyfriends house this whole time, it's a possibility as well. The proof of that is impossible to get if the assault didn't break any bones and She was just skeletal remains when they found Caylee, and no semen or anything else present in the blanket or laudry bag. It seems like she was naked, in a blanket inside a laundry bag. That would also point towards sexual abuse. The decaying smell and hair (according to wikipedia) found in Caseys car would make sense, if they / he used her car to get rid of the body.
Just speculation and having read multiple cases from all around the world, I would not be surprised. young people, on drugs (even alcohol or weed, not necessarily meth or anything), who knows what they can do. If Casey was just dumbly in love with the guy and didn't want to get Him in trouble by telling on him?


this is not a case about how casey killed her daughter and how she’s sick, this is a case about how anyone can manipulate anyone by words.

Exactly. Anyone good with words can manipulate the world. Reminds me of Elizabeth Holmes. She manipulated the whole world including the big ppl up top with high education and wealth.

@Eric Yglesias lol makes me understand trump derangement syndrome better

Its crazy. Makes me understand the trump phenomenon better. Humans are easily manipulated and its scary

A person who lies about everything, compulsively, starts to believe it's all true. As in playing a character.

@Cartswhat I swear many people are easy manipulated, and have almost no reasoning or free-thinking skills. I hope I never have to be judged by a jury.

@Cartswhat Maybe some of the most dominant persons in the jury were strongly anti death penalty, so they would have said "not guilty" even if she had cut the neck of her daughter on live video and bragged about it... and then they managed to convince the rest...

Sick? I don't think I'd use that word. Unless it's in the 'disgust' sense, like - 'omigod, that's so sick!'

And it’s a case of a flawed system. With enough manipulation and charisma of the attorney and the jury (WHICH COULD BE ANYONE. EVEN WITHOUT HIGH EDUCATION or knowledge in law and criminology whatsoever!!!) can decide the future of someone. Whether innocent or guilty. In this case, a guilty cold bitch


This plays almost like the OJ trial. The only difference is that as time went on, his son had a lot of evidence (circumstantial or otherwise) against him as well. I doubt anyone but Casey will ever know the full truth on this one.


Never will understand how she got away with this


Re-watching this after the Amber heard case, and I see a lot of similarities.

Really dude? That’s a bit of a stretch. Amber Heard is an asshole but she is not completely evil like this woman


At first I think, I feel so bad for her parents. I couldn’t imagine having my daughter and grand daughter living with me for 2 years, then all of a sudden my granddaughter is just gone, missing. When he said the house is empty without them, and I feel the pain. But, but, then I realize they have let their daughter get away with so much all her life. From dropping out of high school senior year while living at home, to o mainly not taking their granddaughter whenever Casey can’t watch her,then  to letting 30 days go without asking. They are guilty as bad parents, Casey must’ve felt they weren’t welcome, why didn’t they offer to adopt? And now they give all this care, where was that care when Casey w was out partying and avoiding her daughter to the neglect area


The fact that the best friend was crying and breaking down while Casey is getting annoyed breaks my heart

@HH  the nanny Zenaida or zanny... caysee was high and killed her daughter.

She takes xanax, Thats why she behaves like that. I have theory that when she was taking on the case she would take xanax. And xanax if abused describes her personality flawlessly.

I myself take Xanax and when I abuse it I become just like her. Calm, Arrogant, Not giving fuck, Feeling invincible. People who abuse xanax or benzodiazepines get crazy ideas like robbing, Killing, and just ideas that are crazy. They should test her for Benzodiazepines.

I am really faithful in my theory if its true that she takes Xanax according to video I saw on youtube. Xanax hade role in the killing of her child. Also in interview she says she sleeps well and does not give a f about it.

@Earl Sciambra Jr.  they only vaguely look alike

Staged bullshit. Casey is Allanis Morrisette.

@Yevgeniya Leshchenko When you give your child a graduation party, but you know clearly that she has been expelled due to absences, this is called spoiling the child.<br>Do not get me wrong! I have a little girl of almost 3 years old, for whom I would give my life, I would sell my soul to the devil so that she would be good, But .... I know how to put a barrier to her when she crosses the line between innocence spoiling and wickedness, I know how to give her love, respect, good values and morals. 🙏

@Yevgeniya Leshchenko When you give your child a graduation party, but you know clearly that she has been expelled due to absences, this is called spoiling the child.
Do not get me wrong! I have a little girl of almost 3 years old, for whom I would give my life, I would sell my soul to the devil so that she would be good, But .... I know how to put a barrier to her when she crosses the line between innocence spoiling and wickedness, I know how to give her love, respect, good values and morals. 🙏

@Madalina P.Vilcu How do you know she was a ''spoiled child''? You just can't know it and can't trash her parents with no knowledge

@Madalina P.Vilcu exactly, and it makes me sick that the judges let her get away with it. She's literally if Ted Bundy was successful

She is emotionless. She was a spoiled child, that thought that she will get anything she wants by any means, and she did. That is the frustrating part, a beautiful child was killed and she get away with that.


I don't understand how it's possible.... Whole video I was waiting to see  how she got caught and proven to be guilty.... The end of the story is just insane...Devil's advocate knows his job though

Антон Дмитриев


She got away with murder of her own daughter , can't stand a murderer. She should have been locked up and still in prison.


34:45 I didn’t realise this: at this point she’s arrested for murder?  Yet she’s having a conversation with a detective as if they’re having coffee or bumped into each other at the shops!

The vibe is super weird. She should be demanding to get out; to please find her daughter, saying “what am I doing here? Why are you wasting time?” But, guilty & as a sociopathic manipulator, she’s trying to charm the detective. As if in her stupid head she thinks this’ll work…..

34:45 I didn’t realise this: at _this_ point she’s arrested for murder?  Yet she’s having a conversation with a detective as if they’re having coffee or bumped into each other at the shops!

The vibe is super weird. She should be demanding to get out; to _please_ find her daughter, saying “what am I doing here? Why are you wasting time?” But, guilty & as a sociopathic manipulator, she’s trying to _charm_ the detective. As if in her stupid head she thinks this’ll work…..


This cop was dead on about who Casey was, an absolute callus monster!! I cannot believe the jury was brain dead enough to find this freak not guilty!!! I hope & pray karma & justice finds her & the authorities don't do a thing to find who would rid the world of this monster


She cried more when she was declared not guilty than she did about her missing/dead daughter

It’s because she knows she’s guilty and was shocked to hear not guilty!

@Rev actually you only need to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Not with 100% evidence

@Ege if the woman came on TV today and said I killed my daughter you could not convict her 🤷♂

@Rev You are not required 100% evidence you are required evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. You can never have 100% evidence. Even if someone is caught on tape they could say that the tape was digitally edited or like in another case say the police told them to say it for fame on youtube and by that claim you could never beyond any doubt have 100% certainty that they were lying. But you could reasonably not believe it. The key word is reasonable. The reason why she got away is because the jury was foolish to believe you had to have 100% evidence like you do.

@kamaal fr lmao i knew from the jump not to look in the comments until the video was over

Looked more like she faking it and was actually trying not to smile tbh

@Muscle Band Why are you in the comments? Your a candidate for getting spoiled.

@wubenn you really missed the point of the video if you didn’t see the part where they literally don’t have 100%  evidence that she did it. That’s what’s required by law technically. The old guy towards the end shaming the media and lawyers giving their unwarranted opinion was 100% correct. Whether she did it or not the way it blew up was a fucking nightmare for trying to get justice. Had the media not been so up the case’s ass, it might’ve never come to this.

@Ege don’t quote me on this but I’m pretty sure you can due to double jeopardy

@wubenn after that point they would need to arrest her again even if she confessed

and somehow they were convinced she wasn’t guilty unfortunately


What’s sad is she; (at least for now), has won, and her manipulative nature has won out over those dumb jurors. Thankfully, justice will come to her one day through the Lord himself! 🤷🏻♂💯😏


yknow, the thing that is really distinguishing this channel from other channels that are similar is the narrators voice and how he conveys info. Really miss getting new vids from you guys </3


GOD... My guts churned when I heard "not guilty".


She reminds me of a lot of parents I’ve worked with who end up getting investigated by child protective services.


The fact that a jury found her not guilty just solidifies her cloud of superiority; she can continue to believe she's the smartest one in the room.

The fact that a jury found her not guilty just solidifies her cloud of superiority; she can continue to believe she's the smartest one in the room.

@Colin Maxwell She is in no worse state than anyone else, unless confession to salvation in Jesus is made.  Dont fall for the ideology that the afterlife only punishes the obviously evil.

@Colin Maxwell She is in no worse state than anyone else, unless confession to salvation in Jesus is made.  Dont fall for the ideology that the afterlife only punishes the obviously evil.

@Nerdy Tom she may have escaped justice here but not on the other side

@Nerdy Tom she may have escaped justice here but not on the other side

@ufiCz Yeah, I've read all that stuff before. That's why I told you all the things I told you.

@ufiCz Yeah, I've read all that stuff before. That's why I told you all the things I told you.

@MJ Hm jury who write something like this : The juror — who spoke with PEOPLE two subsequent times since his initial interview — told PEOPLE that the attorneys’ behavior in the courtroom also had an impact in the jury room. He described lead prosecutor Jeff Ashton as “ambitious” and “arrogant.” He said that one of the other prosecutors was “mechanical and cold.”

But the juror had a different take on lead defense attorney Jose Baez. “He was the only one in the room who seemed like he cared,” the juror said. “We talked about that in the jury room.”
" A female juror told reporters that the jurors were “sick to our stomachs” over the verdict. The juror explained that, “I did not say she was innocent. I just said there was not enough evidence.”

This was the consensus of the other jurors interviewed after the verdict, to wit, in this “CSI age”, they expected DNA and fingerprints from the prosecution. There simply was not enough evidence to conclude that Casey Anthony committed the murder beyond a reasonable doubt."
Are just not smart people who should decide such things. Typical brainwashed americans who just don't understand that CSI isn't real life and in most cases there isn't much direct evidence.
To end this debate last post of jury : "Speaking anonymously to People, one male juror said the Anthony trial was “traumatic to think about” as he wished “I had done a lot of things differently”.

The decision not to convict Anthony of her daughter’s death “haunts me to this day” and he wished he had been able to “push harder”, the juror said.

“I think now if I were to do it over again, I’d push harder to convict her of one of the lesser charges like aggravated manslaughter. At least that. Or child abuse,” he told People. "

@ufiCz Quit being this emotional... About IQ, I think I know what I'm talking about, disagree with me if you want but I will not change my mind. It was developed to measure the development of children in the first place, it's been used for other things since but it's a very skewed tool that just measures your ability to understand specific tests of abstract logic.
And yes, I keep talking about direct evidence. Because that's the only thing where you can be absolutely certain that no jury, professional or not, will not argue. That's the entire point of it. Literally everything else is open to interpretation, so with any evidence that isn't direct, it's a matter of which story is the most believable for the jury, the prosecution's story or the defense's story. That's why you need as much direct evidence as possible.
In the US justice system, the judge at first only presides the trial, and if the jury vote for guilty, then the judge is responsible for the criminal penalty, but that's it. It makes sense to not have the whole trial in the hands of one person. What that means is that the jury have a lot of power, and with power comes the responsibility to not misuse that power. You consider they did misuse it, I consider they didn't. The matter here is, noone outside the jury really controls what the jury consider "reasonable doubt" to be, maybe that's a weakness of the system, I'm not entirely sure (as I said before, I could totally imagine a professional jury to have considered the lack of direct evidence to be a reason to have reasonable doubt). But either way, if it's that important that the jury understands very well what is or isn't "reasonable doubt", then maybe an explanation for that should be part of each trial, especially murder trials where the victim isn't alive to testify anymore... I'll give you that.
But let me explain why the jury thought there was "reasonable doubt" here. We're talking about the death of a baby here, there's only two perpetrators that would make sense : the parents, or a pedophile predator (we could look up statistics, but I'm fairly sure those two cover like 99% of the cases). In most cases it's the parents. So, yeah, here's a reason to believe she did it. Also the whole nanny story she made up to explain why Caylee had been missing for a month when her own parents called 911. Caylee died by suffocation and she had googled stuff specifically about that. The smell in the car. All of these paint a clear picture : Casey did it. Sure. Noone is debating that. It makes no sense that anyone else would be guilty here. But here's the problem : there is no physical evidence that proves Casey was actually the person who suffocated Caylee to death. No suspect fingerprints, no suspect DNA, no video footage, nothing. So, do the laws of physics of this universe make it possible that someone else, regardless who, why or how, would have done it instead of and/or for Casey? Yes, they do. For example, it's possible Casey hired someone else to do it for her (and no evidence would have been found), in which case, she wouldn't have been the one who committed the murder (in that scenario, she would have been guilty of sollicitation for murder, and NOT of murder! But she was on trial for murder, so... she would have been not guilty). The devil is in the details. The prosecution needs to make sure to have the right accusation, and the evidence for it. It's a really tricky and stressful business, especially when the prosecution has to talk for a deceased person.

@MJ First of all IQ test are not just to measure mental dev. in children, so you are right out wrong here.
You keep talking about direct evidence, but there is evidence and that evidence is then split into direct and indirect/circumstantial .......
Where is the LAW that stated there must be direct evidence of crime to sentence somebody to jail ? Where is the law that says person can't be guilty based on indirect evidence ?
There is a common misconception that circumstantial evidence cannot be used to convict a defendant of a crime. There is no evidence rule that prohibits a prosecutor from introducing circumstantial evidence or even from solely relying on circumstantial evidence when presenting a case against a defendant. In fact, there may be situations where circumstantial evidence is stronger than direct evidence, especially when the person testifying about what they directly witnessed is unreliable or has been shown to be untrustworthy.
You talking that jury should be impartial, yes i agree, judge too ..... Judge thought state made his case and could't believe she walk free. THIS opinion of judge throwing whole your argument thru the window.
Yes, state prosecutor didn't do good job. Do i blame him she walk free ? Yes, but in the end JURY who tought SHE WAS GUILTY let her go, in the end it's upon on jury to deliver justice and law is, or at least should be about justice. That's main point you still missing.
Little child died in care of her mother. Mother that didn't care, lied,stole, party, acted like shit to every person she knew, didn't even report missing kid, left her in trunk of her car, probably so body will starts to desolve, so autopsy couldn't find anything. Lied about absolutely everything, had motive, railroaded investigation as long as she could, she had means and she research things about murder before.  If somebody talking there is reasonable doubt, he is not reasonable person.

@ufiCz Your base assumption is wrong, though. That's not the role of the jury at all, the jury must be impartial and not on either side of the trial (that's what the prosecution and defense are for). There's a principle that someone is innocent until proven guilty. During a trial, the prosecution will present an interpretation of the evidence where the person on trial seems guilty, and the defense will present an interpretation of the evidence where the person on trial MAY be innocent. The role of the jury is to determine whether or not the evidence confirms the story of the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt, or if the arguments of the defense are good enough to discredit the evidence as being evidence of the defendent's guilt. That is the entire, and only, job of the jury. Also, in the case here, the jury DID want to get Casey convicted, but, the evidence wasn't good enough for it, so sadly, the right thing was to acquit her. Casey was to be innocent until proven guilty, the evidence and story of the prosecution did not prove her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, so she got acquitted. It IS sad, and shouldn't have happened, but that's the prosecution's fault, not the jury's fault. You're being emotional about this, not rational.
IQ tests will not change much. The problem here has nothing to do with IQ. IQ tests are an attempt to measure the mental development in children, it's used on adults but wasn't intended to and really doesn't mean much. It attempts to measure people's ability to do abstract logic, which doesn't have any consequences applicable in a trial for murder.
I also don't think a professional jury would have made things better. Professionals know even better than civilians what qualifies as direct evidence, of which, again, there wasn't enough in Casey Anthony's case at the moment of the trial. Everyone was shocked and disgusted that she was acquitted, but again : if it was so clear that she was guilty, where was the evidence to support it? Think about it.
Double jeopardy actually is very important. It exists because without it, it was possible to ruin people's lives by endlessly putting them on trial, forcing them to spend money on their defense until they were broke and had to cave in (and be wrongfully convicted for a crime they didn't commit). It protects people from legal harassment, which, trust me, is REALLY important. Someone with more money than you could keep you on trial forever, until you were faced with a jury that does think the evidence makes you guilty, regardless if you're guilty or not. The double jeopardy law just has one flipside, as I already explained : when the prosecution presents a case, it MUST be absolutely sure that the evidence supports their story beyond any reasonable doubt. Again, in Casey Anthony's trial, that just wasn't the case. What evidence was there?
The only "minor change" to the double jeopardy law that could make sense, would be : what if there's new evidence found? But new evidence can be found all the time, so, again, you'd open for an endless loop of trials until the person with the least amount of money has to agree to losing the trial. That's why the prosecution should only go to trial when the evidence is already there, which is why sometimes investigations take years, but that's also why murder investigations stay open indefinitely (the system isn't that bad, you see? there's been some thought put into it).
I live in western Europe. The more I think of these things, the more I have to say, I dunno which one between a pro jury and a jury of peers is better. The crime rate doesn't have that much to do with that.

@MJ System expect jury to make justice to victims. If i were in that jury i would fight tooth and nails to get that person in jail. Not based on emotion, based on evidence presented, so i can sleep at night, that i give some kind of justice to innocent child.
Until juror have mandatory IQ test and their deliberation will be ( after fact ) matter of public record, this system is just sham, that has nothing to do with justice or law. Maybe professional jury could make that system better.
If inteligent, law educated judge who handled case was surprised by their decision, there is really nothing to talk about.
And please don't start with double jeopardy again, that's nonsense by it self, it's the law, but that doesn't mean it's good law, or that it needs some minor changes.
Funny thing is that, years ago i was supporter of jury system, because we don't have it in our country. Maybe that's why, we as middle/eastern european country have such a low crime rate.

@ufiCz Well here's the thing. The US law system expects the jury to be impartial, and to convict based on direct evidence alone. But humans aren't machines, so, sometimes there's a lot going on in jury deliberation (watch the movie "Twelve Angry Men", it's about that and it's great) and emotions become part of it. It's sad to say that the jury in Casey Anthony's case actually did their job better than the jury in the case you just described. Regardless what you think about the case, if you're in a jury, you're supposed to be impartial. The US law system doesn't seem to have any solution to the problem that some jurys just aren't impartial, so basically, if you've been wrongfully convicted, you have to hope that the conviction gets overturned, but if you've been wrongfully acquitted, you're protected by the law against double jeopardy (even if new evidence is found!!!).

@MJ I think there is case on this channel, where father of child let his kid in car for whole day and that kid died cause of it. There was no direct evidence, mother of that death child defend his ex husband. Everyone who knew him told as good father he was and there is no chance, he premedited murder of his kid and that he loved him. And yet, he was found guilty, just because jury didn't like him and his life style and he was directly or indirectly responsable for that kids death. He got life behind bars, i think ........

@MJ Again you missing point and you actualy are wrong on so many levels. There is nothing in US law that demands direct evidence. Jury should decide if someone is guilty or not based on evidence presented and if they knew ( as they say ) they knew she was guilty, they based that on evidence they saw.
Inteligent and law educated person, in this case judge, tought state made his case and was sure she will be find guilty, so there is your argument.
Iam well aware of double jeopardy and that is more reason to find her guilty and let her fight her so called innocent at other instances of us court system.
In this case jury didn't do justice to that little girl and let killer go. They knew it and there is really no excuse.
Angry ? That's not word i would use, iam just glad i didn't live next to child rapist ( father ) and child killer ( daughter ) and iam sure in every country where this case would be judge by judge she would go to jail. Worst thing is that, if somebody call her out, there are thousands of brainwashed people, that will defend her with words : "Jury find her innocent, so she in innocent proven in court of "law" ", as if jury can't make mistake.

@Bobs Building it's actually pretty easy. She was on trial for murder. The evidence they had against her was all indirect, nothing was placing her "beyond a reasonable doubt" in the scene suffocating her daughter. They had evidence against her for gross negligence, for sure, maybe even for <b>plotting</b> her daughter's murder, just not for COMMITTING said murder. That's why the jurors had to acquit her, there was no direct evidence at the moment of the trial. Several jurors even said they were angry to have to let her go, because she JUST IS guilty, everyone knows it, but there was no direct evidence. The problem is the law against double jeopardy : when you put someone on trial, you better make sure you have enough evidence to get them convicted. The prosecution should have waited until they had any direct evidence before going on trial, but they didn't and hoped the jury would pronounce her guilty based on all the indirect evidence. But the jury actually did their job correctly : because there was no direct evidence placing Casey in the scene suffocating her daughter, they said they can't pronounce her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Ultimately, the lack of patience on the prosecution's side, and/or the lack of a solid enough criminal investigation, made Caylee never get justice. Maybe, if she had been tried for gross negligence instead/on top of murder, she would have stayed in prison for longer, because the evidence collected might have been enough for that. It's an infuriating story, for sure.

@Bobs Building it's actually pretty easy. She was on trial for murder. The evidence they had against her was all indirect, nothing was placing her "beyond a reasonable doubt" in the scene suffocating her daughter. They had evidence against her for gross negligence, for sure, maybe even for *plotting* her daughter's murder, just not for COMMITTING said murder. That's why the jurors had to acquit her, there was no direct evidence at the moment of the trial. Several jurors even said they were angry to have to let her go, because she JUST IS guilty, everyone knows it, but there was no direct evidence. The problem is the law against double jeopardy : when you put someone on trial, you better make sure you have enough evidence to get them convicted. The prosecution should have waited until they had any direct evidence before going on trial, but they didn't and hoped the jury would pronounce her guilty based on all the indirect evidence. But the jury actually did their job correctly : because there was no direct evidence placing Casey in the scene suffocating her daughter, they said they can't pronounce her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Ultimately, the lack of patience on the prosecution's side, and/or the lack of a solid enough criminal investigation, made Caylee never get justice. Maybe, if she had been tried for gross negligence instead/on top of murder, she would have stayed in prison for longer, because the evidence collected might have been enough for that. It's an infuriating story, for sure.

@MJ probably I was just in shock she's  💯 guilty how she got off with it I'll never know. All documentaries I've seen with American police they nail everyone inocent or guilty how they let this slip is suspicious to say the least. She's an absolute monster

@Alyssa Schneeberger - these are all technicalities - there is no other explanation that makes any sense, other than she did it, and with malicious intent.
There is really no physical proof that Hitler killed anyone either, anymore than Casey did, but there is far more to tie Casey directly to the crime than there is for Hitler to the deaths that resulted from his leadership. Show me evidence that Hitler ever killed anyone. You can't, but we all know damn well you would convict him in a court if you had the opportunity.
The problem now is the selective definition of "proof" we use, to get obvious criminals off, and all that we ignore as "not proof", such as her attitude, her lack of concern all through the investigation, and the 31 days she was missing. But we can't use any of that as evidence, because of sheer technicality.

@Bobs Building yes she did, next time it may be better for you to watch the whole video before getting the spoilers in the comment section

@Bobs Building yes she did, next time it may be better for you to watch the whole video before getting the spoilers in the comment section

I've just started to watch it so you're saying she got off with it??

I've just started to watch it so you're saying she got off with it??

@ufiCz I can totally understand why you're angry at how the case went and that the US justice system allowed it. But please, hear me out on this one. There is a law in the USA against double jeopardy : you can't be tried more than once for the same crime. It's great, because it protects people from "legal harassment", but it's a double edged sword : when putting someone on trial, you have to be SURE you have what you need to get them convicted. What's required is DIRECT evidence, indirect evidence alone doesn't cut it. The prosecution needed to be able to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt (and that's super important), that Casey Anthony herself suffocated her daughter. Her behaviour at least makes her guilty of gross negligence, but she was on trial for murder, not negligence. There was a lot of indirect evidence against Casey, which could have been direct evidence for negligence, BUT NOT for murder. At the moment of the trial, there was no direct evidence placing Casey Anthony in the scene of her daughter's death. There might have been some, but at the moment of the trial, nothing had been found YET, which is why I said the prosecution should have waited. They had no direct evidence, they hoped she'd get convicted for murder on only indirect evidence, but the jury said they can't do that. And sadly, they're actually right. Their job was to decide whether or not it's absolutely certain that Casey did it, based on the evidence they had, and it just wasn't. Was there evidence that she's a garbage mom guilty of gross negligence? Yes. Was there evidence that she considered to kill Caylee or had begun plotting it? Yes. Was there evidence she ACTUALLY did it? No. And again, the prosecution could have waited for the investigation to bring any amount of direct evidence, but they didn't. That's why she's free today.

@MJ You missing the point, point is everyone including jury knew she is guilty and they drop all charges. And iam sory to tell you, but this has nothing to do with justice or with the law it's just loop hole in system.
There were evidence not direct one, but pretty damn good one if you take in count on huge evidence like she waited 30 days just to cover up things.
System that allow this has nothing to do with civilized society or justice, it's just perversion. Jurors can justify their decision as they want, but in the end they let murderer go and they KNEW IT, that's not fault of prosecution that's on their heads. This makes me really sick.

as some people in this discussion already pointed out : the major issue here is that the prosecution's case wasn't solid enough. Several members of the jury that acquitted her have spoken out and said they were angry about having to acquit her, but the prosecution just hadn't provided enough DIRECT evidence for them to pronounce her guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt". So here's the bottom line : everyone knows she did it, because <b>of course</b> she did, but the criminal investigation was botched/rushed and that's why she didn't get convicted for it.

as some people in this discussion already pointed out : the major issue here is that the prosecution's case wasn't solid enough. Several members of the jury that acquitted her have spoken out and said they were angry about having to acquit her, but the prosecution just hadn't provided enough DIRECT evidence for them to pronounce her guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt". So here's the bottom line : everyone knows she did it, because *of course* she did, but the criminal investigation was botched/rushed and that's why she didn't get convicted for it.

@Tyler B Which make me feel that they didn't look at all the evidence, if they had and still found her not guilty, what can i say? I must be wrong, they were right about it, she didn't act, she didn't lie, she didn't kill her kid.

@Tyler B Not saying they could find every evidences on internet, what i mean is what decision they had made let people think they let her got off all her lies easily which still doesn't make any sense even now, at least lies in a murder investigation is a crime that could put her in jail, why i said murder not homicide or accident, see what she wrote and what she did after her kid gone missing, she was having fun and feeling the greatest moment in her life, wtf.

@Rainz Storm But if you had jurors searching the internet for "first hand evidences" and getting that much info and involvement with the case, aren't they supposed to excuse themselves from the jury panel before being chosen as a juror due to already having knowledge of the case?

Very bad jurors. Ms. Ford, a juror, gave interviews and I want to know how a person as dumb as a box of rocks gets selected as a juror, including the rest of the jurors.

Very bad jurors. Ms. Ford, a juror, gave interviews and I want to know how a person as dumb as a box of rocks gets selected as a juror, including the rest of the jurors.

The problem with her trial was EVERYONE knew she was guilty. But of what? Did she directly kill her? Have someone else do it? Cover up a conspiracy after the fact?

No one knew the details, so you can't charge with any ONE specific thing because there is reasonable doubt it could be the other. The prosecutors should have given every possible charge and even charges that cover all of them at once, but they didn't. That's why she got off.

@Queen Bytch Well I would hate to be an innocent person in similar circumstances as her if this is how the justice system works.

@Queen Bytch Well I would hate to be an innocent person in similar circumstances as her if this is how the justice system works.

I am convinced she is The Omen, I actually can't fucking fathom this shit

I am convinced she is The Omen, I actually can't fucking fathom this shit

@Dinsss if I was on that jury  I would have voted her guilty just to hang the jury. That way the prosecution could have retried and been sensible about what they charged her with. Maybe that's not exactly ethical but justice probably would have been served.

@Rainz Storm I feel like only a woman could get off such a charge- men are dealt with much more harshly

@Rainz Storm I feel like only a woman could get off such a charge- men are dealt with much more harshly

@Meme Man Of course, lies everywhere on any platforms, in front of your eyes, that's what they say, but the point is, do you think this video is a lie? The law meant to be protecting innocent people, not the evil one, at least they should not allow the suspect walk free until making clear every lies she told, isn't it better? What a broken system.

@Rainz Storm I do want to make a point that the internet is full of lies- you can get conflicting results on anything you search, as well as the fact that humans are behind any written word, so again, most articles are full of mistruths.

The ability to search and find information does not equal the ability to judge morality or truth, as you have to know how to use the info in that framework. Some of the stupidest people you'll meet will be on the internet, because they spend time on websites like CNN and Buzzfeed and tiktok and Facebook and instagram, which is full of useless filler sensationalist crap.

It still comes down to basic judgement. Computers are nothing special, just a different information medium.

@Novascotia Skater I wouldn’t have given her the death penalty either, but because I believe the death penalty should be only given when there is 100% of certainty the accused is guilty (usually through dna or footage). With her case, I’m only 99,99% sure.

@Meme Man I respect you too, forgive me if somehow i triggered you for what i said, bye~

@Meme Man I respect you too, forgive me if somehow i triggered you for what i said, bye~

@Meme Man You really don't see the point do you? Just think about people not using internet today, they totally living in a lie without noticing anything, and the people who searching on the internet for the first hand evidences, know much better about this world, don't you agree? Of course there have fake videos, fake news, but usually people do realize it real quick just like people know who really running this world, why Biden became a president of United State, something like that.

"Wether or not they can operate a PC has zero bearing on their judgement in the case. " I dare you say it twice.

@Rainz Storm you can't deny her lawyer was a very good liar. All I'm saying is that there are intricate smart liars who can fool even smart people. I didn't mean to disrespect you.

@Rainz Storm you can't deny her lawyer was a very good liar. All I'm saying is that there are intricate smart liars who can fool even smart people. I didn't mean to disrespect you.

@Rainz Storm Wether or not they can operate a PC has zero bearing on their judgement in the case. YOU made that egotistical connection, and I pointed out that there is always another level above what you may think is smart.

@Rainz Storm Wether or not they can operate a PC has zero bearing on their judgement in the case. YOU made that egotistical connection, and I pointed out that there is always another level above what you may think is smart.

@Meme Man I think that's it Zenaida, have a good day.

@Meme Man I think that's it Zenaida, have a good day.

@Meme Man Based on the result of this case, what is so surprise if the juror in the court are someone who doesn't know how to turn on a PC? You never see people that dumb? If they've done their research properly, ask her why she lied about everything and wrote down that note, how she behaved, apparently they didn't, they just believed what she made up of. So this is why i said that.

@Rainz Storm You made the comparison in the first place about the pc lol

@Rainz Storm You made the comparison in the first place about the pc lol

@Meme Man Well, tell me why she keep lying and explain what she wrote then, basing on moral judgement? It was about learning her psychological expression and unfit evidences she provided, smart man, you must be rich to be a lawyer, sell your soul to evil.

@Rainz Storm nothing you just said actually means anything LMAO I just took your logic to its natural conclusion. The real question is, why are YOU relating the ability to judge moral character to being able to turn a PC on or off. THAT makes no sense, so I took it and ran with it.

@Meme Man With your logic , no wonder why she is not guilty after she killed her own child, people busy showing off their skills in this world but forgot the simplest logic, you've just proved how that could be happened, good job for you.

@Rainz Storm It is the same. You are basing moral judgement ability off of subjective knowledge of electronics. Therefore, based on your logic, the more technologically proficient, the better judge of moral character.

@Rainz Storm It is the same. You are basing moral judgement ability off of subjective knowledge of electronics. Therefore, based on your logic, the more technologically proficient, the better judge of moral character.

@Meme Man Are you kidding me? You really comparing these two? "how to use a PC" with "wire up and solder and design a plasma core based off aurduino", some logic please. So you must know how to survive in Mars i suppose, or know what is outside of the bound of universe, who create god? I really clapping for you smart man.

@Rainz Storm at least I understand "how to turn on a pc", like you do. Now, I wonder if you understand how to wire up and solder and design a plasma core based off aurduino.

@Rainz Storm at least I understand "how to turn on a pc", like you do. Now, I wonder if you understand how to wire up and solder and design a plasma core based off aurduino.

@Meme Man Thanks, i corrected it, my bad. You won't understand if i use my native language, so deal with it.

@Meme Man Thanks, i corrected it, my bad. You won't understand if i use my native language, so deal with it.

@Rainz Storm u can turn on a pc but can't use correct grammar xdxdxd

@Rainz Storm u can turn on a pc but can't use correct grammar xdxdxd

And also solidifies her cloud of untouchability.

And also solidifies her cloud of untouchability.

Jury let normal looking people off, its been proven if she looked weird then it would of come back guilty

Jury let normal looking people off, its been proven if she looked weird then it would of come back guilty

And i bet her retired police dad paid for them lawyers

And i bet her retired police dad paid for them lawyers

She must be if she got away with it. She was smart enough to know how to manipulate the system

She must be if she got away with it. She was smart enough to know how to manipulate the system

@J S What do you expect from someone who don't even know how to turn on a PC?

@J S What do you expect from someone who don't even know how to turn on a PC?

Hence she will do something horrible again.

Hence she will do something horrible again.

@Kur čina Yes. When you get called for the jury you're sworn in just like everyone else & you have to agree to look at everything equally & fairly, regardless how you feel about the case. If there was no physical evidence against her then the jury did their job in keeping everything equal. I bet that many in the jury were against her, but they couldn't be fair in prosecuting her. That's probably why the case will never be reopened. Everyone hates her so it wouldn't be a fair trial.

@Kur čina I agree just based on how contrasting the prosecution and defense's statements were in this video. I personally think the case should be reopened, but that will require clear evidence to prove what we know happened, just by gut feeling and an hour long piece.

The Prosecution lost that case due to arrogance.... it was a huge lesson for district attorneys across the country to not overcharge due to being cocky. There is no way any jury was going to sentence her to the Death Penalty when the Prosecution could not show how, when, where and why Caylee died....given all of her pathological lies I understand why the State was so confident but they got caught up in what the media was spewing instead of the reality of the case facts they actually had!

Many Americans don't know how court works. All her lawyers had to do was cast a doubt on any detail of the storyline the prosecutor presents to the jury. <br>These types of cases are win-able if the prosecutor has to fill-in any unknown/unclear details combined with an energetic well paid defense. Court system is quite hack-able for some while being a prejudice steam roller for others

Many Americans don't know how court works. All her lawyers had to do was cast a doubt on any detail of the storyline the prosecutor presents to the jury.
These types of cases are win-able if the prosecutor has to fill-in any unknown/unclear details combined with an energetic well paid defense. Court system is quite hack-able for some while being a prejudice steam roller for others

She wasn't remotely likely to be the smartest one in the room, but her lawyer likely was.  She had good representation and it counted.

She wasn't remotely likely to be the smartest one in the room, but her lawyer likely was.  She had good representation and it counted.

she got off because of Nancy Grace labelling her and a lazy prosecution team

she got off because of Nancy Grace labelling her and a lazy prosecution team


How on earth the jury didn't convict is beyond me


She only shows emotion when it’s directed towards her, Even though these parents seem very supportive and loving. I am assuming that as a child, Casey didn’t get the attention she needed, that led her to be rebellious so her parents could give her the 24/7 love and care she needed. I think that Casey never loved Caylee, she had a child to further being “rebellious” and to continue her constant fight of getting the love and attention she needs.


I dated this type of girl for 3 years, lies everywhere, she is beautifull looks pure innocent but also 'deadly' at the same time, and now I knew where is her skills came from. Hope she will become a real human not a monster in the future.


She’s not actually doing anything that smart during interrogation, she’s just mirroring the officer on purpose (like a therapist would to show they empathize with you) and then not answering his questions.

She’s learned how to do that on purpose so that people like her more, that’s all. She’s may not even be doing it consciously.

But she’s not like some evil mastermind, she’s just accidentally using a strategy she always uses and it happens to be working pretty well here….. at least getting her out of answering questions. She looks the same amount of guilty oh dear…


The minute her mother was trying to hand her the phone to talk to 911 and she said “I don’t have anything to talk to them” was the minute I knew this is about to be TRAGIC.

Gloria Nelson really ? NOT the fact that she wasn't the one calling ? When her mum said, my daughter's here you knew it.


What an absolute fail for the justice system. Casey should be rotting in prison.


Great example of a white, rich woman getting exactly what she wants. I can't imagine what in their right mind this jury was thinking when they came to that conclusion.


29:57 " I can even put to words that she HAD both of you" notice how quickly she corrects herself  "she still has both of you"


can't believe she was found not guilty after all her lies...


Nothing pisses me off more than proven liars feeling vindicated.

@Matto Osteen “Now you shift the blame onto the accuser, trying to weaken their emotional resolve with the guilt you impose”
This tactic is to be expected of a sociopath who immediately feels the need to shut down the debate by trying to make the adversary look unintelligent to completely block off any and all support that he might have from the spectators

In the beginning of the comment, the sentences used were short, possibly to indicate precisely and briefly what the problem is and the urgency required to stop it, but towards the end of the monologue, the sentences morph into long ones, implying that the writer is in no hurry to get the work done, probably because of meticulously planning to take advantage of the prosecution’s psychology to the fullest extent in stark contradiction to the initial impression, which is either an error or some sort of planned trick as initial impressions have a stronger effect on a person, making the man behind this comment far more experienced and dangerous
However, as soon as this scheme has been spotted, all prior calculation is rendered useless and the gambit is foiled
This inaccuracy makes the detective’s work far easier because only one of the above given inferences can be true and the evidence of the case strongly suggests the latter explanation
None of this is completely proven or irrefutable fact, but simply a detailed analysis of possible intentions of the suspect with little to no trace of a firm motive

I got one... proven lying, baby murders feeling vindicated

@Viral Leaks Being serious.  Trying to stop.  I'm older, don't know how to private this.  How exactly is this "validation?"  I posted my request on this thread because I felt like someone like you wouldn't give me B.S. and you didn't let me down.  Thank you, but I'm serious.

@Entropy damn you watch one of these videos and suddenly you talk like a psychologist.

@Matto Osteen A therapist would be the first step. There are plenty of e-therapists as well, especially if you're looking for help with a budget.

@Viral Leaksbro that makes no sense you’re saying he’s  lying about being a pathological liar. Thats a paradox and we’ll never know the truth.

@Viral Leaks he probably isn’t even searching on the internet, but is just trying to arouse our sympathy by distancing himself from his ‘problem’
He confessed already that it has granted him success in the past
Why wouldn’t he want to continue using it?

@Viral Leaks I don’t think that’s how that works.. 🤦♀

@Matto Osteen you’re lying right now. Pathological liars don’t admit to being liars. Stop looking for validation on the internet

I'm almost EXACTLY this kind of liar, but I don't want to be.  Constant success with this tactic makes it super addictive.  Are there any online resources I can make use of to help me stop this behavior?

@Wolfdoggie Tenkaistarit is shit indeed,  she served exactly 3 years to the day of her sentencing. Casey served the equivalent ratio of  <b>one</b>  year in jail for every year of Caylee's short life before Caylee was murdered.

@Wolfdoggie Tenkaistarit is shit indeed,  she served exactly 3 years to the day of her sentencing. Casey served the equivalent ratio of  *one*  year in jail for every year of Caylee's short life before Caylee was murdered.

@Lelo Nene It's shit but on the bright side she wasn't completely unpunished. 2-4 years in prison for lying and a ruined reputation.


This is 100% a narcissist at the highest degree.  Especially in the interrogation room with the detectives, she’s agreeable and is talking extremely proper, trying to make it look like she “has it all together” so the detectives don’t see her as being guilty.  But what she doesn’t realize is that she isn’t displaying the emotions/actions of a grieving mother, the detectives are noticing this also… after watching this compilation of videos and seeing it like this, which is likely why is was put together like this, lol… there is no question who committed this and it’s an absolute embarrassment to our justice system that this spoiled brat got away while lying through her teeth the entire time and I have to tell my kids about this…


at 30 minutes her mother figures it out, you can see it on her face. Casey uses the past tense when referring to her daughter multiple times and then back tracks


I wish this video was a little more neutral in structure (literally character assassination into writing off her defense as lies), but it was primarily informative, and I enjoyed it.

I should probably say, I don't expect to find a more fair treatment anywhere else.


She is evil. That’s all anyone needs to know. And she should never be able to make money off of her evil. Something else that others can’t control.


Hearing her best friend Christina break down like that is heartbreaking, she feels what Casey should be feeling

@Isabella Guy right!! Casey was annoyed that her friend was crying and just wanted her boyfriends phone number… like seriously?! I would be losing it if that were my daughter

its insane that shes been lying about her true nature to her friends and family the entire time, it seems like her brother was the only one who know who she was like

“Oh… my… god. Speaking to you… complete waste of time.”

@ANIMAL LOVERS DONT KILL&EAT ANIMALS🤍ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 😂😂😂you should try comedy😂😂😂

at first i wasnt paying attention and thought she was the murderer so i was like "here we go with the fake emotions" and then i was like "oh GOD no, that was real..."

@Leo Strife no fucken excuse for her actions is acceptable! <br>Man you trippin on some good good huh? The world needs less excuses and more ownership of actions.

@Leo Strife no fucken excuse for her actions is acceptable!
Man you trippin on some good good huh? The world needs less excuses and more ownership of actions.

Did you not listen to a single thing the video explained to you? You overlook the fact of what was said and discovered? How she masked everything up because she was sexually abused by her dad? It became part of her character. Psychologists during the trial gave testimony as to how this works. Why she was unable to display emotion. Jeez, you really drink that koolaid huh

exactly I was thinking the entire time about how devastated the family was about losing that little girl, everyone except the mother

and Casey's reaction was awful, she didn't want to hear any of it


Man, those two detectives at 15 minutes in were having NONE of her BS. They sound legitimately annoyed by her, and when the first one says he thinks everything she says is a lie.... normally detectives use phrases like that to wear down someone, but I think he legitimately doesn't believe a single word she says. Why would he? She literally took them through universal and then admitted at the very end she doesn't work there.


Rest in Peace Caylee 🕊 I'm so sorry you did not get a better mommy. I know my brother in heaven is having  ball playing on heavens play ground with you


Shes more worried about getting out of the situation than her daughter missing. Not showing any kind of remorse whatsoever but is annoyed that no one  believes her lies.