This makes it blatantly obvious that she killed her child, yet she faced no consequences, just like she always hadn't.

@Sayuri calm down dude its not that serious

@Ahmad sleiman no need to get so defensive about it, i can have my own personal beliefs.

@MK out of curiosity, where do you get your information?

@Sayuri Also, by this logic, I can say "Oh, actually, we were created by a species of gallatic unicorns so they could more closely monitor and understand life"  when actually, while this is non falsifiable, you'd look crazy believing this

@R K last time i checked we are called the land of the free the president is not responsible for other people action Trump locked down the country, urged the private sector to make mask and ventaltors and increase testing that all he can do he cant control the people and force them to lockdoqn thats not his job and it never was im sorry you want a dictator as president but i dont  he said it was the states responsibility to handle their people the fedral government would supply the medical stuff that is how this country was designed the state trumps the federal government not the other way around

@TheReverseEffect As someone who is getting his graduate degree in physics, you oughta know that lack of evidence does not mean something is false or no exist. Plus, I haven’t even disclosed my beliefs on the subject. And regardless, an omnipotent God is unfalsifiable. Meaning it is by definition impossible to prove wrong. Hope this bit of education helps you realize how much of a hypocrite you are. And to turn a comment about how a child murderer deserves divine punishment into a debate bout religion is just so juvenile and immature.

@R K biden need to take responsibility for abusing multiple women and little girls but trump not trampling on the human rights of others is the problem trump cant control people or a virus he isnt a god and to soley blame him for virus deaths is like blaming a veteran for getting drafted

@R K you are insufferable. This is a video about Casey Anthony and somehow you have related it to Donald Trump. You need physiological evaluation

@gabyyte god is exist, if god dont exist so who gonna punish this woman?  😃

@R K do you people never think of anything but that man. Go do something with your life man you're wasting it

@TheReverseEffect ah yes, because a massive rise in inflation, gas prices, food prices and the threat of nuclear war from Chinese state media is better than mean tweets.

@Sayuri i just lectured him out of atheism dw buddy.

@Emma Swan god will be too slow. I can deliver directly

It makes no sense. It’s so unfair. She’s so guilty. She’s such a liar. It makes me sick she walks free.

@R K It’s just the fact you want to make an irrelevant joke related to donald trump over such a horrific murder case is what people are giving you backlash for, we understood your joke just didn’t find any humor in it regarding a video like this.

I'm confused if there was duct tape on the body of caylee, why did the defense say she drowned in a swimming pool? Uhh, there was literal duct tape showing she was killed in other means.

@Sassy The Sasquatch you can have the opinion that both are bad lmao. Bernie supporter here, hated Biden too but he was still a fuckload better than Trump on most issues.

@Sayuri don't tell people to grow up when you read x holy book and just take eveything at face value despite there being very little evidence that whatever god you believe in exist. Like come on.

@R K tRUMP supporters KNOW 2 + 2 = 4, they CHOOSE not to believe it. That’s what blind loyalty gets ya.

@Tyler Schneider That'd imply he ever committed a crime, besides making yall's butt hurt.

@SrevA11 dammit, i didnt think she could fool me too.

@gabyyte nah she only made up that "god" guy. Even said he was working at universal but it was proven to be wrong..

ikr, she must think now she can do whatever she wants, probably getting manic very soon and doin' some shit. It's crazy too that there's a whole group of psychopaths doing a strategically tricking defense just for the sake of gaining reputation for cases like this where the accused one is obviously guilty but could be safed by fooling a bunch of people who probably didn't even remember half the speech but "got raped, had to lie, that's not fair". The Defendor even said that they DON'T KNOW what is actually true so it's not right to 'suppose' she's guilty whilst not having enough evidence for the actual murder-part but end his speech with "the charges are simply not true" without having enough evidence of proving they aren't. What a bunch of bs, man, what a bunch of bs.

OMG 24:45 EPUC MOMENT OF "DUPING GLEE" THAT EVEN THE NARRATOR YOTALLY MISSED!!

@Ben Smith Don’t think R K is comparing the level of their criminality, simply the fact that they never face ANY accountability for their evil actions….

@R K And, like her, he possibly never will. It's shameful. Hopefully, there is some sort of unrelated charge (Fraud, etc) that prohibits him from the possibility of running again. Even though I believe he would lose again.


I can't finish this one because seeing this evil woman walk free makes me sick.  At least the other stories end with justice

Not really. When you put 12 idiots in a jury box, stuff like this happens from time to time.


To this day I still don't know what the jury did here. She lied about the nanny and she even said she spoke with the kid a week earlier, when she was already far dead. She never reported it, shows no attachment for the child whatsoever, her car smelled like a dead body, wrote in her diary that it's the happiest she's ever been and wrote that "she hopes the means justify the actions" in her diary, explaining that the time without the kid is the happiest she's been. She said that she had nothing to spoke with the police when the 911 call and also made up Jeffrey's whole thing. And also the nanny didn't even exist so she is trying to be deceitful for the police to find her child, which only makes sense if she's the murderer. I just can't understand how she was found guilty of nothing, not even child neglect, and now is just out there.


I love the defense lawyer, he’s such a jackass and comes off like a car salesman, even the way he’s dressed. Even though it’s awful that she walked, that was some damn good lawyering he did


In September 2008, a Zenaida Gonzalez sued Casey for defamation. During the investigation, Anthony told investigators that she left 2+1⁄2-year-old Caylee with a babysitter named Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez—also known as "Zanny"—on June 16 at the stairs of a specific apartment in the Sawgrass apartment complex located in Orlando. Zenaida Gonzalez, who was listed on apartment records as having visited apartments on that date, was questioned by police, but stated she did not know Casey or Caylee.[182] Her defamation suit sought compensatory and punitive damages, alleging that Casey willfully damaged her reputation.[183] Gonzalez told reporters that she lost her job, was evicted from her house, and received death threats against herself and her children as a result of Anthony's lies. Gonzalez' lawyer, John Morgan, said he wanted to interrogate Anthony about Caylee's death because it was "the essence" of the defamation suit.

On October 8, 2011, Morgan deposed Casey via a video conference. She exercised her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and answered only a couple of factual questions. Morgan felt that was improper, but legal experts thought that Anthony was well within her rights to plead the Fifth until her appeals of the convictions for lying to officers had been exhausted.[185] Gonzalez' attorneys sought and received permission to obtain Anthony's address (though it was kept sealed from the public) so they could subpoena her to testify, even if she only took the stand long enough to plead the Fifth. However, Gonzalez had been willing to drop the suit if Anthony were to apologize to her and compensate her for pain and suffering.[186][187] In September 2015, a judge ruled in favor of Anthony, stating: "There is nothing in the statement…to support (Gonzalez') allegations that (Anthony) intended to portray (the nanny) as a child kidnapper and potentially a child killer."

In July 2011, Texas EquuSearch (TES), a non-profit group which assisted in the search for Caylee from July to December 2008 when she was believed to be missing, sued Anthony for fraud and unjust enrichment. TES estimates that it spent more than $100,000 searching for Caylee even though she was already dead.[189] TES founder and director Tim Miller estimates that the abortive search for Caylee expended 40% of the group's yearly resources which could have been spent looking for other missing children. It only learned that Anthony knew all along that Caylee was dead when the trial began.[190] TES and Anthony eventually settled out of court on October 18, 2013. TES was listed as a creditor to Anthony and was entitled to $75,000


Her conversations with her mother are terrifying, the manipulation is frankly stunning.  She is beyond cold.

@Bob Smith that isn't what sociopaths is. Sociopaths are generally born that way. A terrible childhood makes them worse, and can essentially turn them into "psychopaths". However, a sociopath raised in a loving home still has no ability to feel emotion. They have been essentially " pretending to be emotional beings" since the day they were born.

@Arnel Emnace I think her father being a police officer had a lot to due with her sentencing! They should have charged her with second degree murder, even if it seems obvious given the evidence that it was first degree to us, court cases in criminal investigations are heavily scrutinized and have strict parameters of what evidence can be used,  including how it was obtained.<br>But yes no doubt her Dad had some pull in this. Her family seemed to care a lot about optics, even when visiting her in jail it was do hard to watch how "loving" her parents were to her.

@Arnel Emnace I think her father being a police officer had a lot to due with her sentencing! They should have charged her with second degree murder, even if it seems obvious given the evidence that it was first degree to us, court cases in criminal investigations are heavily scrutinized and have strict parameters of what evidence can be used,  including how it was obtained.
But yes no doubt her Dad had some pull in this. Her family seemed to care a lot about optics, even when visiting her in jail it was do hard to watch how "loving" her parents were to her.

@IAMParaDROID I'll have to rewatch the video so I can find that part! Jim packs so much content into each video that sometimes I can't keep track of which part is which!  You're right though...the manipulation is stunning.  I wonder if her mom realized her whole life that she was being manipulated by her daughter (maybe in denial?) or if she honestly has had no idea.

@Rachel Goodman Both, but especially the initial conversation (early on in the video at least) in which she basically blames her own mother for being in jail.

IAMParaDROID do you mean when Casey is talking to her mom through the jail phone in person? Or when she is talking to her from the jail (the long distance call)? Or both?

Someone mentioned strict - I think that is true due to the fact that her father is a police man, her monther fabricated the whole school fiasco just so they can save their faces from being branded as a bad parent.

Jose will pay the price in the spiritual realm. He represented her for power and to win . its really on his hands now

Yup, the way she speaks to her parents, especially her mother is WILD. and you can tell she controlled them that way since she was a small child.

Chris Leslie love it when an incel comments. Always make themselves known by these classic comments. Cheers for the laugh

James Michaels you have it closes to the truth. The causes of personality disorders are still not fully understood and are constantly changing as more research is being done on how exactly the human brain works. Genetic and environmental influences both play apart in  personality disorders, genes make you vulnerable/more susceptible to developing a personality disorder and environmental/life situation may trigger the actual development. Substance abuse is also believed to be a trigger as well.

I think Casey was definitely guilty she was using tactics that sociopaths always use

@Jason Bladzinski yeah, i was thinking the same. But they arent wrong in a way. Shit loads of trauma and abuse will increase odds of illness and disorders in the mind. Did the trauma cause the illness or just bring it out within them? A real chicken or egg question.

@Bob Smith No, you can be born a sociopath just the same as a psychopath.

She reminds me of Dahlia.  DEMON possessed!

@Makica 1981 sociopaths are made thru abuse and trauma at a young age, psychopaths are just born that way.

you’re mixing stuff up. sociopathy is the result of an abusive childhood and is a disordered adaptation and illness. on the contrary, psychopaths are born, not made that way due to their environment. this is the current general consensus in psychology. Schizophrenia has more of a clear genetic link than it does to abuse.


I thought the question was going to be between life imprisonment and death sentence, not that she was going to be found not guilty, what in the actual f***


Love the channel, the voice. Hope you come back. I never watch videos twice, I've watch these 2 or 3 times and don't get tired of them.


It's nice to hear cops having a human reaction to a psychopath as opposed to all the coddling and stroking of Chris Watts. Even though it was necessary.


See this particular psychopathy can be enabled by meth coke and booze, or "the happiest she has ever been" as she says. Anti psychotics will induce an overwhelming feeling of remorse, followed by a permanent state of PTSD dementia symptoms


This woman literally lied herself out of a murder sentence. Wow

This woman literally lied herself out of a murder sentence. Wow

I teach my child to tell the truth, but honestly in today’s world, I wonder if that’s smart.

I teach my child to tell the truth, but honestly in today’s world, I wonder if that’s smart.

Casey is an honest person.  She was just really confused and had a hard time coping with Caylee's abduction.

Casey is an honest person.  She was just really confused and had a hard time coping with Caylee's abduction.

Guilty or not guilty u gotta admire the fact she actually lied her ass off and got away it....crazy

Guilty or not guilty u gotta admire the fact she actually lied her ass off and got away it....crazy

And she wasn’t even that good at lying... the whole jury just happened to be extremely stupid.

And she wasn’t even that good at lying... the whole jury just happened to be extremely stupid.

thats the entire thing, she didnt. all her lies were exposed and she admitted to them.   she lied from the beginning. but the lawyer convinced it was a defense mechanis, my ass. as if working at universal studios helps in any fucking  way.

the crazy part is that she didn't even lie well, they literally knew from the first lie that she was making everything up, and she somehow still got away with it despite everyone seeing through her lies.  Her mom even says "honey look me in the eyes" multiple times on the jail call, basically saying "I know you are lying to me".  What a fucked up case, hard to imagine so many people involved in the prosecution/conviction could collectively drop the ball and allow this one to slip through the cracks.  It's like the OJ trial all over again.

@Louis Waze sadly you're right. Her horrible lying doesn't affect how much evidence they have against her

@Louis Waze sadly you're right. Her horrible lying doesn't affect how much evidence they have against her

AND.....destroyed her father's reputation in the process. She is one of the top MOST narcissistic, manipulative killers of all time. I will never understand how a jury could hear all the evidence (proof of all the lies she told), and still find her "not guilty". An innocent person does not have to lie, let alone tell multiple lies.

@Davinator_peepo That's largely why she was acquitted , the prosecutor going for death penalty charges and the jurors refusing to kill a 25 year old woman.

@Davinator_peepo That's largely why she was acquitted , the prosecutor going for death penalty charges and the jurors refusing to kill a 25 year old woman.

@Jared Foogle na mate, your bunk mate in prison is in you

@Jared Foogle na mate, your bunk mate in prison is in you

@gitte andersen I agree there should be exceptions but we would need a very good cause to make the call

@gitte andersen I agree there should be exceptions but we would need a very good cause to make the call

@Louis Waze In general, I definitely do agree with you. But in some special cases the accused persons explanations totally lack common sense and in this case involves people who doesn't even exists and a dead child. Your right, it's not about opinions - but beside the hard evidence it's also about plausibility. I don't think she would go free where I come from. The problem with unlawful arrests and investigators who has the right to lie to people when they claim things that are not true - are a huge problem in my opinion. It diminishes the trust to the police as an authority. Not allowed for the police in Denmark. On the other hand - a lot of people here do think our verdicts are ridiculous low - for crimes like murder, rape, peadophilea and violence - me too.

@Jared Foogle isn't she a bit old for you?

@Jared Foogle isn't she a bit old for you?

@gitte andersen this isn’t the issue, the problem then lies in the abuse of these powers: unlawful arrests, conspiracy arrests etc etc. I personally don’t believe opinions should be used as evidence as the people will therefore start being arrested due to a majority verdict and not the actual evidence being presented. Both sides have their benefits and negatives but indisputable evidence is the safest way to go when it comes to convicting the right people and that’s very hard to debate otherwise

@Louis Waze She had the responsibility for her child. Her explanations are bogus, it's not 'just' the lack of emotions, she is lying as fast as a horse can run! So manipulative to her parents. She is inventing people who doesn't exists. How would the jury not convict her on the basis of indicts? Thats crazy! Do they actually need solid proof to convict in the us?  ´The state law supports the same rotten overprotective morals as her parents did. Omg that girl is dangerous. Hope she doesn't get more kids.

And amazingly she didn't even lie well, the prosecutor who tried her should lose their job for fucking up such an obvious case of first degree murder
I mean seriously, every other person she told police about where clearly either picked totally at random or completely fictitious, she didn't report her child missing, her mum did and you can hear the comparison on the 911 call Caseys mum is beside herself with worry, Casey could be talking about the weather to some complete stranger from her tone, totally unconcerned and just spouting her half baked but clearly well rehearsed lie, her reactions whenever people bring up Caylee compared to when they are talking to her about anything else, she is acting like people keep bringing up an ex that she is glad to be rid of and wishes people would stop asking her about, the fucking duct tape!
Should have also charged her with conspiracy to commit as well, because then at bare minimum, they can present the argument of "well either you did it, or you are covering for someone, all the evidence points to those two things, but considering that everyone you have pointed the finger at is an outright fabrication, it's probably you"

Hope she gets what’s coming to her if she’s guilty of murdering her daughter the poor baby...but hey many others get away with murder too she’s not the only one...

Hope she gets what’s coming to her if she’s guilty of murdering her daughter the poor baby...but hey many others get away with murder too she’s not the only one...

@Louis Waze understandably. Many in that thread did not get what you were saying. And I do have my problems with the circumstantial evidence part, esp. since it seems to applied somewhat randomly. It freed her and O.J. Simpson, but did not help so many other, lower profile cases. And I do believe that duct-tape… well you know that. There is such a very fine line between something being accepted as definite proof or being tossed out. Personally I believe that some things are way less doubtful than a witness-statement. But mainly I am glad I don't have to judge person's life.

@Ann D. me too, apologies for the aggression I assumed you were disagreeing with what I said so that assumption was my fault. I hope she got locked up for life and never sees the outside world again

@Louis Waze I did read your argument and heartily agree with you on all points. But I still wonder why the duct-tape on the skeleton would be something she could talk her way out of, or, in hopefully better words, something that would not prove her child was murdered, not drowned, as well as her involvement in the deed. I honestly am too lazy, or too busy, and certainly too disgusted, to really read up on the case, so I just hope to find someone here who might know how that seemingly crucial piece of evidence got crushed by the defense.

@Ann D. did you not read my previous comments. If you actually bother to do so you can see I am arguing that evidence is needed as people tried saying she was guilty just because of her mannerisms and speech,which do you think what you just said should be listed as. If you’re quick you’ll realise I have no issue with this as this is evidence, not something I was arguing against.

@doom buddie First off, I really like your comments. Insightful and non-emotional. Can you please tell me, how the duct tape on the victim does not blow apart the defendants story about how that victim drowned in a pool?

@Louis Waze what about the duct tape on the skeleton?

@Louis Waze what about the duct tape on the skeleton?

@DHAGSFU you’re emotions don’t count as evidence they are simply an indicator, for example if someone acted suspiciously they couldn’t use this as evidence in court, they could however use it as support for a point e.g the person is guilty because of whatever and this is also supported through their mannerisms etc but it is not convicting evidence. I AM NOT DEFENDING HER I AM DEFENDING OUR LEGAL SYSTEM!

@Louis Waze she literally lied about everything. If we are friends, you are murdered and i lie about where i was and i got caught im a prime suspect. What she lied about is far worse tho, inventing people among others.

@cam lacasse I'm sorry you feel that way but you need more evidence other than a person acting gross. I would expect I wouldn't be selected for jury service because of my own forensic experience anyhow.  Shut it with the snappy comments and look at the evidence at hand. Even the jurors thought she was guilty but there was not enough evidence.

@doom buddie You have your opinion.  I suggest to you that you excuse yourself from any jury in future as you unless they have a video of the crime committed.  I don't agree, I agree with the Judge who was so stunned, shocked, he said he actually had to read the sentence twice to be sure he read it correctly.  He said the prosecution proved its case and that both sides of lawyers were very good.  He went on to say, that PERHAPS, it was an accident that the mother gave too much chloroform and went on to mention the two Casey Anthonys.  As soon as the jury came in she was silent and a victim; but when the jury exited the court room, she laughed, giggled, talked to the attorneys and it seemed she was even ordering them what to do. I am of the same opinion of the judge who was in charge of this notorious trial by careless and stupid jurors.

@cam lacasse whatever may be the case, you have to agree the evidence was not solid enough. You cannot lock people up based on what you think they may do, or on how you feel about them. You need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

@doom buddie I am a paralegal so I do know the meaning of circumstantial.  Do you?  A mother who murdered her two year old helpless and innocent child is out on our streets, that scares me.

@cam lacasse I really urge you to look up the definition of circumstantial evidence. Law enforcement does it's best with the evidence they have at the time, I'm not sure what else you can do about that. If you just want a court system based on on only circumstantial evidence and what you THINK may have happened, that's only a few degrees away from total kangaroo court.  Setting aside this case, and broadening our view to the court system and general, I would like to think that if you or I were accused of a crime they would use the best evidence and methods they have at the time - not just shaky evidence or something that might vaguely put you there just because you left your hair there or something. Would you not agree?

had 12 jurors who seemed to have had to have a video in order to show them how she exactly murdered Caylee.  They had no common sense to connect the dots and they wanted to go home -- 11 hours of deliberation - tired of this and to heck with any judicial responsibility we have to the 2 years old victim, this helpless innocent child murdered by her own mother.  How do they sleep at night?<br>@PenskePC23

had 12 jurors who seemed to have had to have a video in order to show them how she exactly murdered Caylee.  They had no common sense to connect the dots and they wanted to go home -- 11 hours of deliberation - tired of this and to heck with any judicial responsibility we have to the 2 years old victim, this helpless innocent child murdered by her own mother.  How do they sleep at night?
@PenskePC23

@doom buddie You know what before we had DNA every case was circumstantial evidence.  Unfortunately we do not have a video of every murder committed, so we have to use common sense and connect the dots.  This woman will kill again and that is the precedent this will set.  Both she and OJ - got away with murder.  But to murder the innocent child of two takes a very evil person with a very dark core.  God will.gave His Karma and it will not be pretty.  Just imagine if she had gone through with her plan to also murder her parents - so she could get the house.  She will make headlines again one of these days,  This kind of murderer doesn't just quit.

@cam lacasse I hate to break it to you but that's all circumstantial evidence, which is not enough to prosecute on. That would set a bad precedent for any case after it. The prosecution really bungled the case, and the police did too. Police got a call for Caylees body (reported as a plastic bag) like a month after her death, no one went to investigate. The google search for suffocation only occurred on a Firefox web browser, and the police only mined data from another browser. I believe she's guilty as sin, but the evidence was so scant against her. Had Forensic methods and due process been the same as they are today, they probably would have built a stronger case.<br>IMO they should have went for lesser charges like infringing on an investigation, lying under oath, child neglect for not reporting her daughter missing, etc. They could have gotten that no problem.

@cam lacasse I hate to break it to you but that's all circumstantial evidence, which is not enough to prosecute on. That would set a bad precedent for any case after it. The prosecution really bungled the case, and the police did too. Police got a call for Caylees body (reported as a plastic bag) like a month after her death, no one went to investigate. The google search for suffocation only occurred on a Firefox web browser, and the police only mined data from another browser. I believe she's guilty as sin, but the evidence was so scant against her. Had Forensic methods and due process been the same as they are today, they probably would have built a stronger case.
IMO they should have went for lesser charges like infringing on an investigation, lying under oath, child neglect for not reporting her daughter missing, etc. They could have gotten that no problem.

Not really, Jose Baez is basically the millenniums Johnny Cochran only probably a lot better. Thats how she got off.

Not really, Jose Baez is basically the millenniums Johnny Cochran only probably a lot better. Thats how she got off.

@matrixfan58 No. I am all for justice, especially for a two year old that got in her mother's way of having fun and sleeping over with her boyfriend.

@matrixfan58 No. I am all for justice, especially for a two year old that got in her mother's way of having fun and sleeping over with her boyfriend.

@cam lacasse You are literally wishing for the murder of an innocent person. Sounds like you have such a great idea of justice.

@cam lacasse You are literally wishing for the murder of an innocent person. Sounds like you have such a great idea of justice.

@1 Mol I thin the jurors were tired and spent 11 hours to determine that a woman and her child last seen was found months later in the same clothes; no one had seen the child since that day, June 16.  The mother continuously lied as to where or who had the little girl.  There is a terrible death smell in the car after it is left by a dumpster and we know the mother left the car since her boyfriend picked her up and she explained that eventually her father would get the dar.  Of course she lied and no one knew for 31 days that this little girl was even missing.  Then it became an onion of lies, one after the other.  She told no one her child was missing.  She borrowed the shovel from net door.  The child's hair - fallen from her dead head because of banding was in the trunk, along with the decomposition smell and chloroform.  Now, how could anyone hearing this not convict this woman?  Shame, shame on a lazy, don't give a darn for justice as we want to go home.

@cam lacasse I think it is that the evidence points to "no one else" instead of "it is her" that made it insufficient. And female privilege is added onto the court. As race and gender is unable to pin her down.

@Ricky Anthony I totally agree with this statement. Some people don't know what "beyond reasonable doubt" means legally

@Ricky Anthony I totally agree with this statement. Some people don't know what "beyond reasonable doubt" means legally

The was proof she lied, proof she didn’t care about her child, but no proof that SHE was the murderer. That’s why she got away.

The was proof she lied, proof she didn’t care about her child, but no proof that SHE was the murderer. That’s why she got away.

Still, it doesn't make any sense that some people believed her...

Still, it doesn't make any sense that some people believed her...

@cam lacasse the prosecution didn't have enough evidence to convict. As soon as the news channels brought up the fact that the evidence they went forward with was unprecedented (the smell of the trunk) for convictions showed it was a rocky chance of conviction at best

@cam lacasse which of those facts are meant to be proof beyond reasonable doubt that she committed first degree murder? That is not the way the law works. The fault if any is with the prosecution, not jurors.

@Zachary Kidd You don't find she was guilty of neglect by not caring for her child - her imaginary friends were obviously not caring for Caylee, the grandparents wanted to see her and knew Casey was using passive aggressiveness to keep them away they probably thought.  No one but Casey knew Caylee was missing - no one knew for 31 days - and that isn't neglect?  Neglect that hinges on murder since the smell of death was in Caseys car and since no one saw Caylee after the 16th the day after the blow up with her mother.  Casey blamed Caylee and got rid of her that day.  I used to think accident - but not any longer - an envious jealous rage and get rid of this child, my child,  which my mother prefers to me and without her I can have the life I want.  Oh, Casey will kill again - hope it is one of the juror's family members.

@cam lacasse If it were my county, the jury may let her go. But she'd go missing just like that child. She got lucky, the evidence wasn't found soon enough. There are certain things we shouldn't let slide, all of the evidence points towards her, it sadly just wasn't strong enough. But as I said, justice doesn't always just end with a jury. What is justice if not just revenge with a new coat of paint?

@Louis Waze There are so many cases where people have been convicted with FAR less compelling circumstantial evidence. The justice system failed Caylee miserably.

@Louis Waze There are so many cases where people have been convicted with FAR less compelling circumstantial evidence. The justice system failed Caylee miserably.

@Louis Waze When you are in a court of law as a juror emotions should never replace FACTS - no matter how stupid one is or how insignificant they feel as a juror.  11 hours of deliberations tells you everything - hey, enough of this, let's get home.  Emotions displaced the fact that Caylee was missing for 31 days and that does not reflect neglect?  These jurors have to live with themselves and know they left a very dangerous person wild on our streets, who will kill again just you wait and see, this is not the end of Casey Anthony and her crimes.

cam lacasse lol I never argued she was innocent did you not even read my comment, at the end of the day it comes down to how the defendants and so forth argue their points in court and clearly the opposing side went more of an emotional biased which the defendants lawyer used against them, I never once defended her, I simply defended the system we have set in place which was wasn’t taken advantage of by said convectors

@Louis Waze Lack of emotion???  Last one seen with child; no one ever saw child again; car smelled of death; would not let her father go into the trunk; 31 days not reporting child missing; child's remains found in same clothes she left home with on the 16th; lies and more lies and still more lies; and you think the jury were looking for emotion?  Well, you know that is the first thing that makes sense as to how they could find her not guilty.  There is nothing else to pin not guilty on, with OJ it was race, but this amazed me until now, "she needed to show emotion" in addition to all the other factors.  OMG!

cam lacasse I agree she’s guilty af but they need solid proof, they can’t make a conviction of a lack of emotion alone

cam lacasse I agree she’s guilty af but they need solid proof, they can’t make a conviction of a lack of emotion alone

How could the jurors not even have found neglect - did they actually attend the trial?  Shame shame on them, how do they live with themselves, 11 hours given to the subject - they wanted to go home.

She was raised thinking that lying will get you out of anything, and I hate it so damn much that it did in this case. She should of been given the chair.

She was raised thinking that lying will get you out of anything, and I hate it so damn much that it did in this case. She should of been given the chair.


and she’s just living her life like nothing happened. disgusting


I felt so bad for Cindy when I watched that trial. She loved that baby more than Casey did. I just wish she didn't try to protect Casey, but I think she was deep in denial.


One thing that really got to me was the talk with her parents when she said Caylee was so lucky then changed it to is so lucky as if she thought of darn did i just implicate myself. Like she realized the word she used made it sound like she spoke of her daughter as if she was dead and decided to change the word to sound like she spoke of her as being alive.


Now it makes sense why she got off. There is definitely more questions than answers. Obviously we know she did it but 12 jurors weren’t going to sentence her to death without knowing for sure how Caylee died. She knew there was  no evidence and the interrogations were a waste a time. They allowed themselves to be shook by her calm demeanor and they were overly emotional. She had control so there was zero chance of a confession. I think she would have been convicted on lesser charges but the prosecution tried to get too much without enough evidence. This case makes me sick.


The fact that she said "She have been lucky to have you as grandparents" and then corrects it to "she IS lucky" is the biggest red flag ever.

@angelicroz she is not taking her side. Its just not a proof of anything

I caught that too. She caught herself then corrected it ...smh

@Nadia Kanwal Write what you mean then. 👍🏻

The thing is though, it's not even grammatically incorrect

@Vincenzina Soós oh please are you really taking side with a person that waited one month to report that her child is missing ? This isn’t okay dude in any way possible

Y E S i was going to comment about that right away

@Matt H But you wouldn't say that for a missing kid, you would say that only after the kid is found. I mean, you would say that after the traumatic event, not while it's happening. It needs a conclusion to make sense.

"...how glad I am that she's had both of you" does not imply that Casey knows the child is dead. That is something someone might say when a child has experienced something traumatic and the parent is glad for the love given to the child in the past. Something to be thankful for, considering the situation. We can also make a case that by emphasizing that "she IS lucky", Casey was just trying to reassure her parents that Caylee is still alive, for their own sake. Lot's of red flags in this case, but this one is very minor at best.

She was lucky to had you as grandFathers, she is still....


So does the grandpa have to do his own trial for the "3yr old drowning in the pool negligence" or the "penis in daughters mouth" thing or was the statute of limitations like 2 years or something? I don't understand how it was simply dropped after one trial, since "someone" murdered the 3 year old and hid the crime for 4+ weeks


Her parents throwing her a fake graduation party is crazy on multiple levels. They invited their friends and family over to give their daughter money for a accomplished she never made is sick. The kicker is they added that she was an honor student.


Whenever I see anything about this case, my heart fills with anger. Did Casey ever say "Caylee"? I heard her say "my daughter" and "she," but I don't believe she actually said "Caylee." Isn't that a sign of her guilt? IF Caylee drowned in the pool, why was there tape around her nose and mouth? Why would it be needed? I believe Casey gave Caylee too much "Zanny the Nanny." (Xanax) I also feel that this decision has convinced other deranged parents that they can get away with murdering their children as well. I will never understand how none of those jurors had reasonable doubt. The media has nothing to do with it. I'm basing my opinion on facts. Damn! I'm so angry!


It’s bad enough to see a child killer get away with murder but to see her law team Parading around as if she’s the victim.


I’m speechless and deeply wishing this case reopens, and is judged by a jury with actual functioning brains.

@Michael Slack no. The prosecution claimed she was suffocated with duct tape. The defense said she drowned.  So you find her not guilty of murder too. Interesting.

@Michael Slack Right? Honestly I'm surprised she didn't get off and that her dad wasn't jailed from all the lies she told about him...🙄🙄🙄

@Jason Wolfe you’re right. Even if she went on national tv and said “I did it. Yeah! I did it” while doing a plié they still couldn’t touch her. 😂

@꧁ Orlando Cruz ꧂ exactly- but in this case she was up for the Death penalty- which is why the jury did the right thing. And even if she had been found guilty and gotten the death penalty there would’ve been an appeal and she’d be off Deathrow by now due to the lack of evidence from the state

@Jaimie completely agree and the jury did the right thing.... and even if she’d been found guilty and got the DP she would have won an appeal by now and definitely gotten off death row... the jury got it right considering the State couldn’t prove when, where, how, why Caylee was killed so you can’t sentence someone to death with out that. Unfortunately the State overcharged her and were too arrogant in believing they had the case in the bag.

@roberts1711 absolutely! It’s not the jury’s fault- the State didn’t prove their case.

@Michael Slack the case can be reopened but they can’t charge Casey with murder again.... she was found not guilty. She can not be tried twice for the same murder if she was found not guilty. The only way to try her again would be if the other trial had a mistrial or she’d been found guilty and got a retrial on appeal.

@MG if you Are found not guilty that’s it,new evidence or not you cannot be tried twice for the same crime. The only way around that is if they tried her on a federal charges now that the state has failed.

Double jeopardy. They can’t re open the case , ever .

@Michael Slack NOOO listen because youre slow. SHE CANT BE TRIED AGAIN FOR THAT CRIME. So if they found a video that shows her killing her daughter she cannot be tried for the murder of her daughter. It would be against her 5th amendment rights as an american citizen.

This won't happen. We have a double jeopardy clause here. If you are acquitted of a crime you cannot be tried again.

@roberts1711 They had little real evidence. Just a hard one to lose.

Me too! I hope she goes back to jaillll for a long time.

@J. J. The Victor what you described isnt beyond a reasonable dount so any jury finding her guilty for that reason would be wrong

@roberts1711 Thank you for the information, but seriously, if it was an accident and she loved her child she would have atleast gave her a proper ‘funeral’ and bury her with due love and respect. The fact that they disposed of the body and the manner it was found in should tell any other jury enough.

@roberts1711- thanks for that explanation. If everything happened the way you said than I also agree that I would’ve reached the same verdict. I am not going to send anyone to prison for life if I believed it was an accident or if the prosecutor didn’t convince me of their guilt. It must be beyond a reasonable  doubt to convict. Thanks again for taking the time.

@꧁ Orlando Cruz ꧂ no they insisted on going for murder which although we all know she did it. We cant PROVE. Ill describe the issue the jury had.

The prosection story they told the Jury had holes. The basicaly said casey left with the child in the car. At some point at an unknown locaton she killed the child using duct tape and then dumped the body.

This is a crazy.theory which brings more questions than answers.

The defense theory said "it was an accident she died in the pool and we panicked and hid the body"

To the jury tue defense story seemed more logical. All evidence presented could fit either theory but since the prosecution didnt give any specific evidence of why their theory was right the jury couldnt give a murder conviction.

The issues with the prosecution theory

1. There was evidence earlier for the jury to suspect the child died in the pool. The pool ladder being down which it shouldnt be.

2. The prosecution insisted casey used duct tape to kill caylee but its a illogical way to picture killing someone.

3. They cited position of duct tape near the skull as poof of murder. But the body was exposed for months and we have evidence it was underwater at points die to flooding. There is evidence wild animals eating the body moved it around. The man who found the body admitted to picking up the bag and the skull falling out. So duct tape ending up at a certain position on the skull means nothing due to how much the skull and body was moved.

4. the jury admitted aftet the defense story made more sense than the prosecution. They stated the prosecution didnt give an explanation of where the murder happended only it was outside the house and how she killed with duct tape.

The prosecution should have also brought lesser charges of neglect. Moving a corpse, manslaughter etc

Or at least come up with a logical story of casey putting her in the pool and walking off and letting her drown as there was evidence all trial the pool played a part and the murder by duct tape was fucking stupid nonsensical idea.

@oberts1711  you know what? I believe you. The prosecutors  probably aimed too high with the amount of proof they had which probably wasn’t enough .So we probably would’ve came to the same decision as jury had we been part of that jury with the info given. SMH

@꧁ Orlando Cruz ꧂ dont be mad at the jury if you watched the trial you would see the shitty prosecution left them no choice

It amazing how this woman is such a pro at lying that she can actually beat a murder when it’s obvious she’s guilty. I am not mad her  . I am mad at the prosecutor and the jury  and the system.

Many of the jurors said that they believed she was guilty but because the death penalty was on the table they lacked solid evidence to convict her.

@J. J. The Victor they do need proof but if the prosecution dont provide it they cant find guilty

@roberts1711 and the jury didn’t ask for, nor needed proof?

Its not jurys fault the prosecution was awful. They presented no evidence to prove their theory

She’s basically blaming her father wtf this  case is so cooked

Its all about manipulation and emotional appeal. Facts never matter in the end

It can't reopen im pretty sure I'm not 100 but 98% sure its done now

Yeah, they only reason they could reopen the case and try her again is if new evidence came up, but at this point that seems very unlikely.

If it was no decision jury locked, there would be. But double jeopardy you cant be tried twice. Thats why the menendez brothers were retried with a smarter jury.


Interesting how they never mention finding the “true” killer


JCS is THE LEGEND! The amount of true crime youtubers inspired by this channel is astounding. Pls come back. Sincerely fan from the start.


There's a revealing moment in the discussion from gaol with her parents when she refers to Caylee in the past tense (technically, the pluperfect) and then immediately corrects herself.


Any time I have ever seen Casey's face I get boiled with anger. I have two daughters that are everything to me and to think the one person that should love you does the unthinkable. Awful


It’s crazy how she makes up these detailed stories of non existent people and without skipping a beat. PSYCHO!!!!!

I'm a pathological liar. It comes surprisingly easy. I'm trying to get better to make sure I don't hurt anyone with my lies. I don't know if this was the same case with Casey, but I lie casually in everyday life, even when I don't need to. It becomes a reflex after some time.

She could be an incredible writer and storyteller

Most people would stutter their words trying to fake a name. She doesn’t. That is some scary stuff.

@Marcin Widz  I couldn't stop having flashbacks of my ex who had the very  same story as your ex. What did you learn from this relationship and didn't you notice the same traits in the next partner?

and then manages to MEMORIZE their storylines

@Luke Sargent an occasional lie is okay? you sound like a citizen bro, not it isn't a problem, yes it is a talent though not a positive one, t lie on the spot so quickly an convincingly means the right side of your min (creative, on the spot thinking) is more than healthy. Where the problems lie is when people started using that for bad, then claim poor mental health when they knew what they was doing.

I was believing everything she was saying until the guy said that non of these ppl exist.

@Zzz S Yeah, when he said he was going to go to her house to talk to her parents we asked him why bother, and he said there's other three dudes out there thinking they just found the love of their lives and he needed to do something for them and for her to seek help. He went to her house and his roomate (the one that found the msn logs) actually contacted them vía msn and explained the whole ordeal to them. Very very awkward situation overall.

Those stories are paper-thin and sound lame as hell.

I used to lie the same way as a young kid/teenager. In her case it's because she's a sociopath trying to cover her tracks. In my case it was because I was afraid of being punished, and afraid of not fitting in, so I would create elaborate lies to either get people to like me, or to get out of stupid little things. It only stopped when a friend of mine finally sat down with my parents and started listing off things I had said to find out if they were true or not. I came home to find him chatting with them, and they ended up calling me out on a lot of my lies. My friend then told me that I didn't need to lie to him for him to like me or think I was cool. He already thought I was cool without the lies. From that day forward the lying slowly died out and today it's almost non-existent apart from the odd little white lie we all tell once in a blue moon.

@Dante Fabian “the truth is the best excuse” u had me in the first half Ngl

I used to be able to do that when I had strict parents lmao she is too old for this

@Taylor Peay nice false dilemma. Or you really think one may praise women OR be sexist/aggressive without any middle options?

I had a girlfriend like this once. I just couldn't stop getting flashbacks of her when listening to Casey. My ex had triple life with 3 different men and wouldn't stop lying even when presented with undeniable proofs. People like this really exist in the wild and you wouldn't know because of how excellent their lying skills are.

@Taylor PeayNever said women couldn't be terrible. Look at the video we're watching. I was just making fun of that dude who says shit incels definitely say, whether he was joking or not. I though I was being pretty funny. Is that "cherishing the ground women walk on"? Of course putting them on a pedestal is ridiculous. So is thinking they're all psychos lol.

Did someone take my incel joke personally? I wonder who's more scared of an incel joke? Someone who will make one casually for a laugh, or someone who worships the ground other incels walk on? Nice little jump I made there, sound familiar? Projection indeed.

@Shaun Bat hell no, me neither! I remember when I watched this in the beginning and everybody was just in complete shock!!!!

@Dante Fabian aww i hope you guys are doing well.

I was like her. I could spin an intricate lie like nobody's business. I often lied for no reason. Until one day I met my wife. She could see right through me and called out all of my bullshit. One day I decided to tell her who I really was. All the ugly and all the horrible and the disappointing me. The real me nobody else sees. See saw me at my worst, but she still loved me. So I married her. One thing I learned lying all those years is this..no matter how good you are at making up excuses, the Truth is the best excuse.

it's actually SOOO ENTERTAINING. SO INTERESTING. AMAZING.

@Final Steep my thinking exactly.. i write stories and because of my diagnosis (autism and ADHD) i am more creative and can actually act like i feel something even when i don't or when something doesn't interest me at all like if someone hurt themselves i'd still act like anyone else on the surface where as on the inside i'll be like : shut up about this so we can actually talk about something interesting. i can also lie pretty well as i've gotten out of situations most others would just accept mostly school related like how at our school camping trip i lied about the fact that i couldn't bike i can ride a bike just fine but the fact that i knew we would have to bike several miles a day to get to several places i knew i wasn't going to hold out on that one.. my legs and ass would be black and blue from soreness at the end of the 3 days.. (partially because of the saddle and partially from just being on my feet all the time.. i've always had issues where i can't stand or walk for too long and since i rarely bike at all my ass would be so sore i probably wouldn't be able to sit aferwards) so i put on my biggest worry face and went to the teacher to tell him i couldn't bike.. now parts of the story i told him were truths like how my mother made a huge fall on her bike when she was younger and at the time was still terrified to get on one.. so i told him that because of her fear they never taught me (even though my grandpa taught me the ropes and the rest i just did on my own wich was hard but it was mainly a can i do it or not kind of more mental thing) this is only one of the many times i've lied thing is when i do lie it's usually to not have to do something rather than lieing about not having done something when i really had done something..

I met a girl like Casey once, but was a cheater not a killer - here's the story:

It's amazing to see but it's more crazy to live it. When i went to college we had a group of friends and one of them met a girl somewhere. I went to my friend's house and she was there, they were dating and he intruduced her. For the next 7 months or so she became one more of our group of friends and everybody  loved her. Everybody had several things in common with her, you could tell her you love apiculture and she would be like "yeah me too" and was convincing as hell.  She went from the newbie to the center of attention in no time. She work at Carrefour and she would make something with the register so my friend could pass a whole full cart and pay just for a shampoo or something (we were broke, not his finest time but hey, she convinced him that was fine and no one will notice). They caught her ofc and fired her and even then she was like "Don't worry it was a shitty job, i'll find something else". 7 months go by and her and my friend went back to our hometown for the weekend i think and my friend's roommate uses his pc and I don't remember how but he find MSN logs of her talking to other 4 different dudes. He tells my friend and he confronts her, she denied every single thing and fabricated a story where my friend's roomate tried to hook up with her and she denied and didn't say anything because did not want to hurt my friend or some skizo thing like that, bonkers. My friend and his roommate are loyal best friends and he knew he wasn't the one lying and at that point he knew something was wrong with her and ended the relationship right there. The next time we all met we basically talk about her and everyone's statement was trully revealing, she played everyone of us like she wanted just to be liked as much as possible. My friend went to her house for the first time after all happenned to tell her parents (was clear at that point that some mental illness was going on) about her condition. Her brother, who knew nothing about my friend dating her, told him she's like this, that has been in mental institutions a couple of times before and he apologized to him for any harm she caused and the best thing he could do is just forget her and let it go. When my friend was telling us this he said that her brother demeanor was shame mixed with sadness and impotence, trully heartbreaking. In hindsight we discerned most of her lies and we can trully say that she didn't said the truth once to anyone, we felt like morons. No idea what was of her after this, she just dissappeared of everybody's life in my group.

@Michi isn't that what writing's all about lol.

@Michi if you're like that than I heartly request you to not give blatent lies after murdering your own daughter. Its disgusting

@Michi lying isn't really a talent it's more of a psychological problem. I mean an occasional lies okay but this art of lying is absolutely ridiculous

@Amphibeing McShpongletron hope she sees this bro

@#Anton #FIN Sorry to hear about the involuntary celibacy bro


I worked with one of the jurors for many years. We were in Tampa, that's where jury was pulled from. He told me that very quickly all the jurors agreed something bad had happened, but all agreed they did not know what? In addition, part of the judges instruction for Murder 1 stated a cause of death of homicide was mandatory, the prosecution NEVER proved a cause of death, many theories but no cause. Without a cause of death, defense never had to mount a case, it was over when prosecution rested. His opinion, they overcharged her with what they could prove.


It means she was of sound mind whenever she killed her daughter/had someone kill her. Which is beyond fucking terrifying and sickening. I can't even stand looking at pictures of this woman because she just gives me the creeps.


How could the jury have let her go free? Amazing…


When talking to her parents, she said "(I am really grateful) that she's had both of you as grandparents" and then corrected to "she has both of you as grandparents"
<br>Isn't that insinuating that she knows her child is no more....

When talking to her parents, she said "(I am really grateful) that she's had both of you as grandparents" and then corrected to "she has both of you as grandparents"
Isn't that insinuating that she knows her child is no more....


The fact that her best friend Christine on the phone sounded more like a mother really suffering, beggin for answers about the little girl, is heartbreaking... i feel so sorry for her...

@little ghost let me tell you when I say my JAW dropped when they said her father had sexually abused her.

@monarchyofclowns ahhh someone recognized the quote :)

@PrometheusV you mean the way children have always been?

@Haze The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.

Give pet to a kid, if the pet died, dont let them married or have a kid, don't let them only until they can take care of their pet properly.

29:52 "Caylee HAS BEEN so lucky " then she corrects herself

@Commander Ponds CC-411 <br>I don't believe she's human at all! In fact, I have no words to adequately describe my intense hatred for Casey Anthony.

@Commander Ponds CC-411
I don't believe she's human at all! In fact, I have no words to adequately describe my intense hatred for Casey Anthony.

@Shadow my conclusion, she's just the most selfish manipulative  careless human I've ever seen.

Yep. Horrible. The friend cared more about that little girl than her own mother.

When she said, "wow this is a waste" when her best friend is saying "if anything happened to that little girl I'm going to die!" I honestly lost my mind. How can any mother respond like that about their own little girl?


Girl drowned in a pool, okay. To go 31 days, just living up life at bars, smoking weed ETC. Then you get questioned, lie about almost everything multiple times...Odd internet search history...and get found guilty on absolutely nothing? That's amazing


I’m very interested to know why she wasn’t re-tried with the charges tampering with a body and criminal obstruction of justice


hard to believe Mr. Anthony was once a cop.. Funny she gave the nanny the name of Zanny  , the street name for Xanax. GHB was huge in the club scene back then ( ask me how I know?). i know they checked for chloroform but i wonder if they ever considered GHB -something about that Tony guy that that gives me bad vibes


Defence lawyers are better liars then Casey! What a world we live in!


I still can't believe a jury let her off.  She has really never been held accountable for anything.

Well she could not be proven guilty BEYOND a reasonable doubt so the jury did right. Who else than she could know what actually happened. She could have just accidentally killed her or due to neglience and it's pretty normal for people to cover up their fuckups. Well normal people probably wouldn't cover up their fuckup if it causes their own kid's death but since she didn't give a shit about her child this could very well be the case. Murder charge in a situation like this is way too risky with so little evidence and a major fuckup from the prosecution.

The jury looked just like her. Nothing to be surprised about.

@David C highly disagree with your opinion. We've all been kids. My parents did everything they could to try and raise me right. In the end my stubborn ass just didn't care and I always just did whatever I WANTED TO DO. despite all the teaching they gave me. Granted I didn't grow up to kill anyone so they're parenting must have worked atleast a little. My point is it doesn't matter how much of a good Job parents do raising thier kids...it helps but doesn't mean that kid will grow up an angle. That's on the kid not on the parents. Parents can show you the path but it's up to the kid to decide which path he/she will take.

@Eshajori naw man, abused kids are more likely to be Borderline Personally, Sociopath, etc, than non abused kids.<br>Being spoiled to Casey's degree isn't much better...

@Eshajori naw man, abused kids are more likely to be Borderline Personally, Sociopath, etc, than non abused kids.
Being spoiled to Casey's degree isn't much better...

She's a (physically) beautiful, generally pleasant women. I'm not surprised at all.

@JAMBERRY , actually, the fact she so actively conceal her daughter's being dead, how she totally deceived her family and law enforcement.. right down to a rehearsed story trying to blame a "immigrant woman" (since you HAD to bring "racism" into this....) says otherwise.

Again, all offense, there are many people who are justly in prison on less evidence than was in this case. The very arguments you are making (about feelings) are the only reason she is a free woman.  That jury had no reason whatsoever to give her that much benefit of the doubt.

Also, all offense again, there are many times that the Innocence Project has also abandoned cases when they learn the person is really guilty... those just don't make for good sound bites.  You only hear what you want. because you need to believe in the "evils of" our justice system.  I get it: we are all scum and deserve to die according to you  We get it.  You didn't get "Fair in your favor" in life.  Sorry that is how the world works, but stop blaming one country.  Stop making all Americans "great Satans" against the ideology you falsely believe will "save the world".  It isn't going to happen.  A great big "collective hug" and "trusting in the better nature of man" is a lie.

You believe in an altruism that doesn't exist.  I see humans for what we are: incapable of being good without a system to bring the hammer down when it is deserved.  Most of those "innocent" people are in no ways "totally innocent".  Some are.. but most of the time.. they either end up in prison for things they did and didn't get caught doing,, or as amplification for things they did and up to that point got slapped on the wrist for. You far out people call that "karma", don't you?  There is room for forgiveness.. but not forgetting.. and people like you think that even cold blooded killers should "get away with it" if a jury "just doesn't feel it is true".

You put a lot of hyperbole into your words.. but facts tell a different story.  You want to get away with something yourself.. so you cheer from the side lines hoping you will get off like she did.. and we both know it.

@JAMBERRY, what is most incredible, though, is that you don't care one bit she so blatantly displayed Dark Triad personality behavior (which killers always display), and go for the "you're a racist capitalism male scumbag" vitriol.. with no real argument at all.

She infact seems to take her all decisions crazily-wrong and Immoral the whole life.

@Greg Rickard oh yeah phew, she'll think twice before killing her next child... wtf is this comment

I reckon this one was a close enough call to  put some fear in her though.

It’s just insane. This case is infuriating.

It’s just insane. This case is infuriating.

@Krazy Reckz 100% and with less evidence too

@Krazy Reckz 100% and with less evidence too

She's lucky, she's a woman.  If it were a man, that's life for him

@Tucsonan Dude Those 2 things are not related, but go off girl

@Paddy They could not find her guilty BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.  Everything presented was circumstantial.

@American Banana REASONABLE… there was nothing reasonable that could prove her as an innocent party at all.

It’s baffling how they found her not guilty, and even more baffling how they sleep at night after making that decision

@Eren Jaeger Probably not evil as much as self-absorbed; some to the point of detriment to the common man.  Hence, laws.

@Eshajori Circumstantial evidence at best.

@Eshajori Circumstantial evidence at best.

She wasnt overcharged, plenty of evidence, especially with the computer searches about which the mother lied on the stand, and the duct tape. Like they lied about the abuse. the jury simply did not want to convict her, because she would likely get the death penalty. That is also why parents lied for her. Death penalty is bad for justice, makes people do stupid shit and doubt when it is completely UNREASONABLE.

@Jill Pearson Ha! Ain't that the truth... Preach !!!!

@Great Minds101 I TOTALLY AGREE!!!! THATS ALL I WOULD HAVE NEEDED!!!!

@Great Minds101 What about internet searches? suffocation? foolproof suffocation?

@David C sorry, I read your comment wrong. I thought you said they should also be charged.

@Lord Maliscence Moreover, in most cases the type of childhood trauma/neglect/coddling (etc) which causes a person to develop these personality flaws is rarely similar to said flaws. In other words, you don't usually get a cold-hearted, selfish, neglectful person like Casey from a cold-hearted, selfish, neglectful parent. Rather, Casey cares only for herself because she was raised in a way that re-affirms her importance over all others. Make no mistake, an over-nurtured, coddled, you-do-no-wrong environment can be just as toxic for development as one of neglect. But that's less obvious to people, and the idea of it being a crime is laughable.

I mean, we've only really scratched the surface of this kind of psychology in the past few decades, and the VASTLY overwhelming majority of the population are suffering though unhealthy cycles from unresolved childhood experiences, without even an inkling that it's happening. Good, well-intentioned parents fuck up their children all the time. If not understanding that is a crime, we should probably all be in jail.

@MystiKasT That's absolute nonsense. The duct tape and search history combined are undeniable evidence of premeditation with the intent to kill. You don't search for a way to suffocate someone merely to cause them harm, let alone "FOOLPROOF" suffocation, and use of duct tape contradicts a crime of passion done in the heat of the moment, if indeed such a crime can even be committed against a 3 year old. She wasn't strangled, she was suffocated which is a passive act that takes time. 1st degree murder was a completely reasonable charge. The failure lies with the jury.

@David C Bad parenting is bad, but it's not a crime. "My parents raised me wrong" is not a valid defense. You can't just pass the blame onto your parents for your own egregious acts. The only reason the parents would be held accountable is if they had direct knowledge of her acts and neglected to report it, and in some states even that is not a punishable offense.

I watched this trial. Jose Baetz is a badass defense attorney.  He was able to establish doubt in the jurors minds.  You must convict beyond reasonable doubt.  And that was part of the reason why the jury found her not guilty.

@Tee Ohbee Crazy...I think this would have been a good case to go with their feelings. The smell from her car is enough in my opinion...

@MystiKasT , there have been cases before where they were convicted and have stayed that way.  No.. The jury went in there looking for any reason to let the "tight bodied hot mess" off as much as what you are saying.  There is even a highly decorated ex-Marine serving life on less than what this prosecution had... in one of the worst states to convict someone without a body as well.. Virginia.  Simple truth.. that jury wanted to let her get away with murder, and they will be held accountable for it eventually too. if they aren't already by people who know them.

@MystiKasT Bingo. That's why she walked. Overzealous prosecutors screwed up.

The jurors that have come out and spoken have had the general consensus if they went based on feelings, extremely guilty. But, the evidence wasn’t presented to vote guilty on the charges given.

She was convicted only of that which she was guilty.

The prosecutors overcharged her.  The jury could not convict of premediated murder based on the evidence.  The prosecution gambled by overcharging in hopes of a plea deal and they lost.


Wow, she sure suddenly had a lot of emotion to show once nobody bought her lies and she was called out.


It’s mind blowing that she got away with this. I’ve seen people with FAR less evidence get convinced


And she still got away with it. Absolutely insane. I hate that I watched this


If this ruins her life and haunts her forever, it’s the least she deserves. She is guilty as fck.

If she didn’t kill Caylee herself, she is still the gateway to ultimate discovery. It is deplorable and shocking to see her walk free.


This was one of the biggest miscarriage of justice in years. That jury is nuts.

@Daniel Schneider Yes, you explain it well. Just to add... Don't blame the defence lawyers, they were also doing their job. They made their statements and asked their questions in the court. If their conduct is not acceptable, the judge and the prosecution should have objected. The defence don't need to prove nor believe that the defendant is innocent. Their job is only to raise reasonable doubt in the minds of 12 people. Our justice system errs on both sides, there are plenty of innocent people in the prisons too. If we don't want guilty people to walk free, we have to reduce the burden of proof, which means also more innocent people will end up in prisons.

@Toekaan ... Because not everyone brought to trial is so obviously guilty, and the only people who will ever know the 100% truth (including intentions) are the parties involved? We have a jury as an attempt at an objective perspective of the given events. It just doesn't always work out. That's no reason to go all Judge Dread though, tough guy.

@Kimmy Gibler I mean they are too stupid to get out of jury duty so...

The trial lasted for months. You have seen a cut compilation of about 1 hour. You have no idea what happened and you cannot claim you do.

The problem is the defense is all like this is an innocent woman when in reality she is still prime suspect and guilty of murder of her daughter but there was (arguably)not enough evidence to convict her.

@Innertuber40 according to his book, all of that was a shot in the dark to garner sympathy for Casey. He knew about the firefox search history that showed she was looking for ways on strangulation. The defense was waiting for prosecutors to present it.

I'm not quite sure how to feel about this defense lawyer. I have a lot of respect for the profession in general; it takes a brave person to defend someone you know is guilty.<br>But basing your case entirely on the emotional appeals of a pathological liar? The pool narrative? The abuse narrative? Ad hominem against the State? He did a bang-up job, gosh darnit, but I feel like that went beyond his duty to uphold truth and justice.

I'm not quite sure how to feel about this defense lawyer. I have a lot of respect for the profession in general; it takes a brave person to defend someone you know is guilty.
But basing your case entirely on the emotional appeals of a pathological liar? The pool narrative? The abuse narrative? Ad hominem against the State? He did a bang-up job, gosh darnit, but I feel like that went beyond his duty to uphold truth and justice.

The jury wasn’t nuts, the defence attorney had them by the balls & the prosecution messed up. They should’ve tried to convict her on a charge that they could prove beyond reasonable doubt, such as negligent homicide. Casey’s blatant disregard for her daughter’s life in every aspect of this case would have been enough to prove negligence & the duct tape found on her corpse could been used to prove homicide. As much as I hate the outcome of the case, he did a fantastic job. Also once you realize law isn’t actually about justice & is simply a game of loopholes, it’ll make more sense to you. For the record I think Casey did it.

Sadly, Caylee did not receive justice in this case, but this was not the jury's fault, it was the prosecution's. They went after a first-degree murder conviction, but there just wasn't enough evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in court. They made the rookie mistake of over-charging beyond what they could reasonably prove, and the defendant walked away scott-free. Had they pursued a less serious charge of second-degree murder or negligent homicide, they may have gotten a conviction.

Very sad that this happened.

But of course. As Gervais always said, let's stop asking the general public their opinion. Why in the world a verdict shouldn't be a technical work.

@Daniel Schneider Pretty much what you said. The prosecution was entirely to blame in this case, it's not that "our justice system is flawed bruh it needs reformed so cases like this don't happen anymore." More like our prosecutors need to be better trained and more equipped for gathering the proper evidence to utilize against the accused. People are so quick to cast blame on our justice system, but then forget that that same justice system also put nutjobs like Chris Watts, Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, Jodi Arias, Jeffrey Dahmer, etc. away. A vast majority of the time in cases like this, the prosecution does an excellent job of presenting the evidence and a solid case against the person that cements their guilt. They just failed in this case. And because of that, a 95% more than likely guilty person gets to walk free and not be tried for this crime again.

Well, the next time you get a jury notification do the right thing and serve. It is so easy to cast blame, yet people look down on the process. It's a civic responsibility. I did my time and while I wouldn't volunteer for it again, I took what I had to do very seriously.

1. she is a woman. 2. reasonable doubt. You can know someone is guilty but that is not proof. Reality is and always has been stranger than fiction.

@Noman I’m finna pull up to her and give her what she deserves lol

@luuk v It does not happen all the time. Look, this shit happens, and in this case and the OJ Simpson trial, they both should've been locked up for life, and I'm sure it does happen outside of big, broadcasted cases such as these, but to claim that the system is just leaking guilty people back out onto the streets all the time is a gross exaggeration. Not to mention, our justice system is set up the way it is to mitigate the potential of sending innocent people away for crimes they didn't commit, and to keep from exposing them to the trauma/horror of prison, and potentially creating more criminals when they get out of prison/jail. To quote William Blackstone: "It is better to let ten guilty people go free than to let one innocent person suffer wrongful conviction" (this is paraphrasing, obviously, but it still gets the idea across)

@luuk v It does *not* happen *all* the time. Look, this shit happens, and in this case and the OJ Simpson trial, they both should've been locked up for life, and I'm sure it *does* happen outside of big, broadcasted cases such as these, but to claim that the system is just leaking guilty people back out onto the streets all the time is a gross exaggeration. Not to mention, our justice system is set up the way it is to mitigate the potential of sending innocent people away for crimes they didn't commit, and to keep from exposing them to the trauma/horror of prison, and potentially creating more criminals when they get out of prison/jail. To quote William Blackstone: "It is better to let ten guilty people go free than to let one innocent person suffer wrongful conviction" (this is paraphrasing, obviously, but it still gets the idea across)

@Loot plug she was found not guilty. She is living free.

@l c hey so I just wanted to ask if this case is really over?! Like wtf are you sure we can’t do nothing about this! This lady should be locked up man

That defense attorney emotionally manipulated them. It was a calculated defense and I have little doubt that he knew the jury he was playing to.

That bitch murdered her daughter and then went partying. The only tears she shed were for herself and the possible threat to her future.

I hope she doesn't sleep a single night the rest of her life but, considering the monster she is, I won't hold my breath on that.

Unfortunately it happens all the time. It's just that the vast majority of cases doesn't get any media attention.


It’s heartbreaking how everyone but the mother was worried about the baby.

23:39 even her best friend cared more about her than the mother.
And the grandmother was more panicked when calling the police


When she's talking to her mom through the video thing is fantastic.  "You dont have to look at the camera, look at me" is some boomer shit. Watching her get annoyed with her mom not understanding how the camera works, rather than being upset about her daughter, makes it so obvious.  She could have at least tried to look innocent.


I remembered when I used to hear guys talk about how hot she was. It made me sick that they could be turned on by someone who murdered her child & tried to cover it up like a true psychopath.