Statistically speaking, there are 12 people in the entire world with an IQ under 10. How did they all end up on the same jury?

Statistically speaking, there are 12 people in the entire world with an IQ under 10. How did they all end up on the same jury?

There's no doubt that whole jury thought and know she did it, but they have to go on what the defence attorney said in his closing statement. I seriously don't know how that lawyer lives with himself though knowing he just let a women who suffocated her daughter go free with absolutely no consequences

There's no doubt that whole jury thought and know she did it, but they have to go on what the defence attorney said in his closing statement. I seriously don't know how that lawyer lives with himself though knowing he just let a women who suffocated her daughter go free with absolutely no consequences

A lot of people have the view that women are pure, innocent. On the majority of countries, all of us are pounded with the idea of virgin, helpless, purity of women. Thats the reason theres so many incels, women get less harsh sentences for the same crimes compared to men. The feminist movement was powerful and its implications have changed society and will continue to do so. Reality is, from a societal standpoint, youre at a advantage if youre born a woman.

That's the way the justice system works, they WILL-NEVER-EVER get an intelligent jury with the ability of critical thinking. This is true so that the stupid zombies aka jury can be easily manipulated. So look no further!<br>I approve this message!

That's the way the justice system works, they WILL-NEVER-EVER get an intelligent jury with the ability of critical thinking. This is true so that the stupid zombies aka jury can be easily manipulated. So look no further!
I approve this message!

easy, its Florida(spoken by a floridian)

easy, its Florida(spoken by a floridian)

@James P Casey was obsessed with her appearance. She looked like shit and her dad said something to make her smile. It’s no different than telling someone who isn’t that smart that they are “so smart.” You build up your kids in ways that matter to them.

I do get what you are saying because if my dad called me gorgeous, I’d ask him if he bumped his freaking head, but my dad calls me “baby” and I don’t think anything of it because he always has. Maybe he’s always called Casey “gorgeous?” I don’t know. I do know that I’m a grown woman, in her thirties, and definitely wasn’t ever molested though and it doesn’t bother me for my dad to call me “baby.” Now if my husband called me “baby,” I’d be like, “wtf? I’m not a baby.” 😂

@Andy Tomlins I find most Doctors to be absolute idiots in my Country. The opinion of absolutely anybody could be just as valid as the next persons. A vicious and sick minded criminal can possess the IQ of Einstein and a deeper state of consciousness than the Prophet Muhammad was born with including access to the Astral Realm in a higher and more precise degree than even masters of Yoga such as myself, although highly unlikely... It is still possible that a Human could gain such a level of insight and enlightenment on a devastatingly expansive level that they could indeed attain a level close to masters such as myself in a few thousand more births...

Although though unlikely, with the odds of dying from a falling Coconut from it's Tree being approximately 100'000 times more likely for such a person.

@Annamaria V. ...do you not THINK this is a LIE also?? ..just think about it for a min...BABYSITTER..person in her MIND....where she said she worked ...Yes worked there BUT not doing what she said...list goes on and ON....do I THINK her father touched her NO ...IT WAS A FEEL SORRY FOR ME ....well that’s what I THINK

@Annamaria V. ...do you not THINK this is a LIE also?? ..just think about it for a min...BABYSITTER..person in her MIND....where she said she worked ...Yes worked there BUT not doing what she said...list goes on and ON....do I THINK her father touched her NO ...IT WAS A FEEL SORRY FOR ME ....well that’s what I THINK

It the war on science and experts that the right-wing has been pushing. It's designed to make all opinions have equal weight to actual evidence. Now people think the opinion of a c list celebrity is the same as a doctor.

It the war on science and experts that the right-wing has been pushing. It's designed to make all opinions have equal weight to actual evidence. Now people think the opinion of a c list celebrity is the same as a doctor.

@Jason Kauppinen that is the most ridiculous statement I've ever heard. Europe is the fastest growing Atheists population on the planet. America's zealous Bible bashing is front and centre.

What on earth gives you that opinion?

@Jason Kauppinen that is the most ridiculous statement I've ever heard. Europe is the fastest growing Atheists population on the planet. America's zealous Bible bashing is front and centre.

What on earth gives you that opinion?

She is innocent. The baby drowned in the pool and she felt so stupid and embarrassed that she thought she would make it look like somebody killed the baby so at least someone else would be to blame and not her because God forbid that she gets her reputation tarnished (in her mind)... Then the Marijuana wore off and she panicked and ermmm... Where was she again, huh? Anyway must dash to the Clubs. This is total normal behaviour for a Woman of course she is not Guilty.

nah thats like half of people living in states south of the Mason-Dixon line and we all have the lingering effects of slavery to thank for that fact.

nah thats like half of people living in states south of the Mason-Dixon line and we all have the lingering effects of slavery to thank for that fact.

I don't really know what you mean. Presumably you're talking about the verdict. Anyone can see, and the jury very obviously new that Casey Anthony lied, a lot. They knew there was something off about her, they knew she probably had something to do with her child's death, and they all knew she didn't care. However, they also all knew that there was very little solid evidence of a murder being committed by Casey Anthony when the police alleged it happened you talk about the members of that jury having a low iq, yet it's pretty damn clear you're not the reddest Apple in the tree

You must have never been to Florida before. Not only do 12 people with an IQ of 10 live there, but the 20 people with an IQ of 15 and under also live there. I know, I was born there. Luckily, I was able to leave that state before It affected my intelligence.

You must have never been to Florida before. Not only do 12 people with an IQ of 10 live there, but the 20 people with an IQ of 15 and under also live there. I know, I was born there. Luckily, I was able to leave that state before It affected my intelligence.

One actually spoke out and said his decision haunts him everyday.. seems they were rlly cut off from the whole scope of things and caseys lawyer was better at manipulating their emotions

One actually spoke out and said his decision haunts him everyday.. seems they were rlly cut off from the whole scope of things and caseys lawyer was better at manipulating their emotions

Welcome 2 Florida. The state that got Donald “Dufus” Trump elected😭

Welcome 2 Florida. The state that got Donald “Dufus” Trump elected😭

@Bec they actually chose me for a jury and I am highly educated. I’m not tooting my own horn, but I’m saying that they do choose people sometimes with educations. That said, I got out of jury duty because my patients aren’t going to care for themselves for weeks on end while I make $25-30 a day sitting on a jury. The judge signed off on releasing me immediately as soon as he found out what I did.

I think that’s why a lot of the people on juries are actually less educated, or at least are stay-at-home-parents— they can afford to miss working a little more than some of the rest of us. Personally, I fully support them doing their civic duty; I simply cannot sit on a jury without lives being risked in the process.

@Annamaria V. That's exactly what I think. Her parents ran a little family cult, and she was their golden child.

@Annamaria V. That's exactly what I think. Her parents ran a little family cult, and she was their golden child.

@Bec This is true. If you work in a profession which likely indicates intelligence they'll clear you of jury duty, whereas if they think it's possible you'll just go with the herd it's all green. A relative of mine is a doctor and he has never been on jury duty. But his wife who's "just a housewife" has had it.

@Bec This is true. If you work in a profession which likely indicates intelligence they'll clear you of jury duty, whereas if they think it's possible you'll just go with the herd it's all green. A relative of mine is a doctor and he has never been on jury duty. But his wife who's "just a housewife" has had it.

Actually jury had no choice.bcz of lack of evidence thats the truth u can deny it.even if u think also i myself thing she killed her child we cant say someone is guilty without evidence.

Actually jury had no choice.bcz of lack of evidence thats the truth u can deny it.even if u think also i myself thing she killed her child we cant say someone is guilty without evidence.

Lol, they jury did their job. The prosecution totally fumbled this.

Lol, they jury did their job. The prosecution totally fumbled this.

@mandala 314 your profile picture and comment says much about you.

@mandala 314 your profile picture and comment says much about you.

Makes me wanna know what the jury directions were.
Jury, SIT.
 Good Jury.
Jury, SPEAK.
Good jury.

Makes me wanna know what the jury directions were.
Jury, SIT.
 Good Jury.
Jury, SPEAK.
Good jury.

@Annamaria V. product of genes, upbringing and live events really

@Annamaria V. product of genes, upbringing and live events really

they may have selected people who didnt know anything about the case, prior to being selected, for 'legal reasons'

they may have selected people who didnt know anything about the case, prior to being selected, for 'legal reasons'

One of them ended up in the Youtube comments section

One of them ended up in the Youtube comments section

I am honestly still baffled by the fact that, boiled down, the life of a person is decided by 12 random people with no necessary understanding of the law whatsoever.

I am honestly still baffled by the fact that, boiled down, the life of a person is decided by 12 random people with no necessary understanding of the law whatsoever.

it's remarkable really, must have been the same people/ decendants of the people in the OJ Simpson trial

it's remarkable really, must have been the same people/ decendants of the people in the OJ Simpson trial

@Rudy Flannery why? You had nothing to do with this. Lawyers have a way to convince people they’re bad if they think a certain way and most will follow if one believes lawyers or media etc..

@Rudy Flannery why? You had nothing to do with this. Lawyers have a way to convince people they’re bad if they think a certain way and most will follow if one believes lawyers or media etc..

@Jason Kauppinen yes and if we let all the immigrants and it will be a Muslim country too. That's what's happening all over Europe and UK.

@Jason Kauppinen yes and if we let all the immigrants and it will be a Muslim country too. That's what's happening all over Europe and UK.

Thank you and I couldn't have said it better !!!

Thank you and I couldn't have said it better !!!

I would assume the defence manipulate the emotion

I would assume the defence manipulate the emotion

Yeah i dont understand this either, i wouldnt want such stupid and easilly manipulated people to decide my fate, it all boiled down th which lawyer was better, the truth had nothing to do with this trial.

Yeah i dont understand this either, i wouldnt want such stupid and easilly manipulated people to decide my fate, it all boiled down th which lawyer was better, the truth had nothing to do with this trial.

@Annamaria V. she made up an entire person i doubt anything she said was true

@Annamaria V. she made up an entire person i doubt anything she said was true

Important to remember that jurors don't make decisions based on whether or not they think someone is guilty or not. Its all based on evidence and weird rules. Many jurors have had to say not guilty due to lack of evidence etc when they knew/felt the defendant was actually guilty. Its kinda fucked.

Important to remember that jurors don't make decisions based on whether or not they think someone is guilty or not. Its all based on evidence and weird rules. Many jurors have had to say not guilty due to lack of evidence etc when they knew/felt the defendant was actually guilty. Its kinda fucked.

@Annamaria V. she’s a compulsive liar. She made it up.

@Annamaria V. she’s a compulsive liar. She made it up.

@Mog doesn't matter the fact is she DID kill the child

@Mog doesn't matter the fact is she DID kill the child

I opposed to this yet find it hilarious 🙈

I opposed to this yet find it hilarious 🙈

bruh all it takes is common sense to realise that she's guilty

bruh all it takes is common sense to realise that she's guilty

@Holland4evahh racism is everywhere my dude.

@Holland4evahh racism is everywhere my dude.

They said there wasn't enough hard evidence to convict. Some of them I guess have had a difficult time with the outcome.

They said there wasn't enough hard evidence to convict. Some of them I guess have had a difficult time with the outcome.

@Bec Totally, but that's why prosecutors are supposed to be part of the process too! If jury selection is why a case goes weird, somebody made a big mistake.

@Bec Totally, but that's why prosecutors are supposed to be part of the process too! If jury selection is why a case goes weird, somebody made a big mistake.

It’s easier than you think to be manipulated though. That’s why cults exist. Things would be better if her lawyer dedicated his talents to writing instead.

It’s easier than you think to be manipulated though. That’s why cults exist. Things would be better if her lawyer dedicated his talents to writing instead.

@Bec It depends on the cases. In cases like this I must say u want a young below 40yo educated, possibly not married nor have children and have social life jury. This is a death penalty case, most of the time jury on death penalty cases are more cautious if theres no physical evidence. They dont want that on their conscience later on. <br>For me the prosecutors thought her lies and digital evidence would suffice. Yes the evidence would convince me that shes not a good person, but if theres even a slightest doubt that this girl might not do it then the case would go 50/50 or even fall apart. Prosecutors did a bad job in linking their theory of 'shes a bad person' to killing a baby.

@Bec It depends on the cases. In cases like this I must say u want a young below 40yo educated, possibly not married nor have children and have social life jury. This is a death penalty case, most of the time jury on death penalty cases are more cautious if theres no physical evidence. They dont want that on their conscience later on.
For me the prosecutors thought her lies and digital evidence would suffice. Yes the evidence would convince me that shes not a good person, but if theres even a slightest doubt that this girl might not do it then the case would go 50/50 or even fall apart. Prosecutors did a bad job in linking their theory of 'shes a bad person' to killing a baby.

@leons be ah yes, because the legal system was made to reward whoever was the better lawyer, to hell with justice

@leons be ah yes, because the legal system was made to reward whoever was the better lawyer, to hell with justice

I bet the defense lawyer has kicked out all the smarter ones

I bet the defense lawyer has kicked out all the smarter ones

Ok but how tf did someone score under ten

Ok but how tf did someone score under ten

You make a mistake, all be it a small one. Their COMBINED iq is actually under 10, not each individual one having less than 10 (i know the comments oldish but had to tell this dumb joke[not as dumb as the jury tho])

You make a mistake, all be it a small one. Their COMBINED iq is actually under 10, not each individual one having less than 10 (i know the comments oldish but had to tell this dumb joke[not as dumb as the jury tho])

@First name Last name I agree! Come on, maaan. That horrible woman would say ANYTHING at ANY TIME to get out of ANY consequence. She murdered her child so what's to stop her from destroying her devoted parents as well? What excuse could someone have to just believe that she was telling the truth about her dad? Oh, wait, I forgot... "Believe all women!"

MandaLa 314 you can not be serious, god you people are obsessed with trump and his supporters, sickening.<br>A jury like that actually comes across like leftists.

MandaLa 314 you can not be serious, god you people are obsessed with trump and his supporters, sickening.
A jury like that actually comes across like leftists.

Annamaria V. Oh please, you actually believe that crap? 🤣

Annamaria V. Oh please, you actually believe that crap? 🤣

She wasn’t Hispanic or black she is very eloquent Well spoken innocent looking western woman the system saved her.

She wasn’t Hispanic or black she is very eloquent Well spoken innocent looking western woman the system saved her.

ig it was a requirement to think on the same wavelength as hers.

ig it was a requirement to think on the same wavelength as hers.

@jan cason  i agree that it is disgusting.
and im sorry you had to go trough it.
you cannot go back to the person you were.
but if you conquere your trauma you will be jan 2.0
this is a metaphore i hope u understand it.
you cant undo whats done.
and yes i know people get off this kind of stuff.
but it isnt proven in this case.
all i can see is that she is desperate.
and an innocent life is lost.
thank you for sharing :)
i respect you!
Sometimes people judge even tho they dont know what they are talking about

This whole thing is disgusting, and growing up with mental and physical child abuse I can swear there are people out there who get off on this kind of thing.  I had 13 years of abuse, and it changes you so much, you cannot go back to the person you were meant to be.<br>Also,  I mean no disrespect here, but Ano Nym, you are very witty.

This whole thing is disgusting, and growing up with mental and physical child abuse I can swear there are people out there who get off on this kind of thing.  I had 13 years of abuse, and it changes you so much, you cannot go back to the person you were meant to be.
Also,  I mean no disrespect here, but Ano Nym, you are very witty.

I find it hilarious how nobody understood what they said in the end.
DONT SPECULATE and if your NOT sure  you can't prove it.
if you cant prove it you cant sentence someone.
Like the lawyer said  : the key question will never be answered.
how did she die?
maybe her mom did kill her , maybe not.
Nobody can prove it.
Besides that its an horrible event that she died.
she didnt deserve that..
And you can see the mom is hurting , whatever reason that is i dont know.

@J Bird the abuse part, if you listen, is to justify her lies. She's been forced to lie since she was young because her dad forced her so. And given the parents covered up her lies, I wouldn't be surprised if that happened for real. Her parents look fake af

@J Bird the abuse part, if you listen, is to justify her lies. She's been forced to lie since she was young because her dad forced her so. And given the parents covered up her lies, I wouldn't be surprised if that happened for real. Her parents look fake af

@Sebastian Styles you can't get persecuted for rape if there's no evidence. It's her word against his

@Sebastian Styles you can't get persecuted for rape if there's no evidence. It's her word against his

@Kathy M oh so you can understand a relationship from a few seconds clip? Mhm

@Kathy M oh so you can understand a relationship from a few seconds clip? Mhm

@bigdpw yeah the point is that they had no evidence against her

@bigdpw yeah the point is that they had no evidence against her

Best comment, I've read on youtube period!

Best comment, I've read on youtube period!

Heatherleigh (True Crime content coming soon)

@Annamaria V. apparently the grandparents were instructed to show NO emotions during trial or they would be removed. I don’t believe she was sexually abused, but used that as a way to get out of trouble because her first plan didn’t work. I’m no expert and wasn’t there, tho.

@Annamaria V. apparently the grandparents were instructed to show NO emotions during trial or they would be removed. I don’t believe she was sexually abused, but used that as a way to get out of trouble because her first plan didn’t work. I’m no expert and wasn’t there, tho.

That's how it works. Been in 3 jury duty requests so far in my life. I always get booted  due to my interest in the facts and questions about the attorney s line of questioning. One time I heard waaaayy to much about a "self defence" murder case. But the attorney litteraly told the jury pool that the dude had been shot in the back off the defendants property..  initially I thought wtf... You just got bias with letting us know facts about the case that we shouldn't have known!!! But it was a calculated move.. cherry picking the jury.      Anyhoo. F casey anthony.. lol.  Let's just forget about the duct tape... I use duct tape every time I go swimming, works great. Nothing bad has ever come from putting duct tape over your mouth.. .. ever.. 😆

Her attorney gave them an acute case of the scruples

Her attorney gave them an acute case of the scruples

@Joe Bajano & btw, not all Americans like cheeseburgers. I haven’t eaten a cheeseburger since 1998. So one mistake right there, being prejudiced toward a whole country, & acting like you’re so above everyone. My best friend lives in Tokyo. & I have family in Europe, but have no desire to visit-bc of all the ignorant prejudiced snobs.

@Joe Bajano many people try to come here. Excuse me. (The arrogance 🙄.) get over yourself.

@Joe Bajano many people try to come here. Excuse me. (The arrogance 🙄.) get over yourself.

The prosecutor's book provides an interesting idea on this...he said he knew he would lose the case because of the jury. The case was so widely publicized that the only people that had not yet made up their minds on her guilt or innocence would be people who would never make up their minds no matter how much evidence they heard...and the jury basically said they did think she did it, but they couldn't be SURE she did...ugh. Basically, "Yes, I think she's guilty, but I still have some doubt..."

@Michele Mahon you really detailed the whole farce perfect. My biggest aggravation when watching the trial was how people were mad at the jury for the outcome. Those jurors had no choice but to acquit because the prosecution was so bad. Your right they were arrogant and thought they had it in the bag because of public opinion that they fumbled their way thru the trial. Caylee deserved so much better and her mother should be in prison instead of talking about having another baby 😡🤬😡

@Jamie Willoughby At this point I am not sure if you're trolling. Having skills and knowledge are not equal to intelligence. Depending on what you're interested in and how you grew up this knowledge might vary (the most fitting word for your second friend would be street smart btw). Some would say intelligence is the ability to adapt, some would say human life itself is intelligent and that's it. But most of the time when measuring intelligence we go by measuring memory, language skills, logical and problem solving skills, etc. which are all skills valued in school. Sure, you can just say that the school system is not the best and people slip through but most of the time these people just aren't capable of providing the needed cognitive skills. As you can see, there are defined parameters and especially your second friend doesn't fit any of them which doesn't make him any less of a person... if this world would only be based on ones intelligence we'd be fucked because we need these people too.

Interesting fact: Jeff Ashton (one of the prosectors) was the first attorney in the US to use DNA to convict in a capital murder case.

Interesting fact: Jeff Ashton (one of the prosectors) was the first attorney in the US to use DNA to convict in a capital murder case.

@Wurstfinger1337 what would happen if your intelligence is outside the defined parameters I had a friend that was very smart partly due to the fact that he was 87 years old he was highly educated in and out of the classroom and knew a lot of things if I had a problem he was the first person I went to l have another friend that dropped out of school when he was 16 because he didn't know how to read very good (not because he was lazy or incapable of learning but because the school system was not good and he slipped through the cracks)  he probably would not do all that good on an iq test but he is one of the smartest people I know he is shrewd and learned basic survival skills  because he had to if need be he could lead a subsistence lifestyle better than most people if l was lost in the woods he would be the first person I would want around

@Jamie Willoughby Everything can be measured. Trying to say that humans just want to control anything is neither edgy nor true. Intelligence can be measured if we define parameters to do so. You are just outright wrong.

@Jamie Willoughby Everything can be measured. Trying to say that humans just want to control anything is neither edgy nor true. Intelligence can be measured if we define parameters to do so. You are just outright wrong.

@READ MY COMMENTS BACKWARDS she is a bad mother

@READ MY COMMENTS BACKWARDS she is a bad mother

@Wurstfinger1337 no it's not possible to have an iq at all level of intelligence can't be measured like your shoe size or something like that it's just humans thinking they can control everything

@Wurstfinger1337 no it's not possible to have an iq at all level of intelligence can't be measured like your shoe size or something like that it's just humans thinking they can control everything

Choosing jurors is done by the court. Not the attorneys

Choosing jurors is done by the court. Not the attorneys

@Bec each attorney gets 3 strikes meaning 3 jurors they can get rid of and pick then the court chooses by random number another juror to take their place. They decide by providing a voir dire which are questions the attorneys all agree on that can determine if you are biased as a juror

@Bec each attorney gets 3 strikes meaning 3 jurors they can get rid of and pick then the court chooses by random number another juror to take their place. They decide by providing a voir dire which are questions the attorneys all agree on that can determine if you are biased as a juror

@Mog and so how did it go, what is the truth?

@Mog and so how did it go, what is the truth?

@azsuter without reasonable doubt maybe...pressure to find a guilty is perhaps better than opposite.like o.j simpson for instance.i saw a interview  of his then legal shapiro and he wasn t happy about the original decision.

@azsuter without reasonable doubt maybe...pressure to find a guilty is perhaps better than opposite.like o.j simpson for instance.i saw a interview  of his then legal shapiro and he wasn t happy about the original decision.

in your eyes thats what that means. But these jurors need to quit being coaxed by prosecutors into finding an assailant to put these crimes at ease when no evidence exists. This is all cirmonstancial and not hard evidence. People forget that they need to prove "without a reason of doubt" before finding people guilty. Shame to those that use their option on the case at hand. It is the states job to prove without a shadow of a doubt otherwise. QUIT BEING A PART OF THROWING INNOCENT PEOPLE IN JAIL!!!

Because they were also required to work on the Steven Avery/Brendan Dassey case

Because they were also required to work on the Steven Avery/Brendan Dassey case

what evidence make casey guilty? make the connection that the prosecution couldn't.  casey was completely innocent

what evidence make casey guilty? make the connection that the prosecution couldn't.  casey was completely innocent

Because the prosecution never made their case. I live about an hour away from where this happened and I watched this trial everyday and I knew they were never going to find her guilty

Because the prosecution never made their case. I live about an hour away from where this happened and I watched this trial everyday and I knew they were never going to find her guilty

IDK but they did get death threats after they found her not guilty. Must have been the same people on the OJ trial.

IDK but they did get death threats after they found her not guilty. Must have been the same people on the OJ trial.

florida. something is wrong with most people there. is it the sun?

florida. something is wrong with most people there. is it the sun?

Don’t dis a whole country bc of one bad trial. America is awesome, now that we’ve voted trump out. That’s why everyone is always trying to come here.

Don’t dis a whole country bc of one bad trial. America is awesome, now that we’ve voted trump out. That’s why everyone is always trying to come here.

Prosecutors over reached for political reasons. It should have been charged as second degree.

Prosecutors over reached for political reasons. It should have been charged as second degree.

It’s not that they were stupid it’s that the prosecution fucked their case up lol

It’s not that they were stupid it’s that the prosecution fucked their case up lol

Best comment I've seen under all of these videos

Best comment I've seen under all of these videos

@Aga M as I have more information about this case, now i know that. I feel so bad about the father... this woman is so disgusting 🤮

@Aga M as I have more information about this case, now i know that. I feel so bad about the father... this woman is so disgusting 🤮

The jury system is inherently flawed. The average person gets their high school diploma, maybe and associates and that’s where their education ends. I would never ever trust 12 random people with my life. I would never trust 12 people to do the right thing..

The jury system is inherently flawed. The average person gets their high school diploma, maybe and associates and that’s where their education ends. I would never ever trust 12 random people with my life. I would never trust 12 people to do the right thing..

@puppykicker WE? I assume that you were not there! And that was not the point here either! You are notorious for your weapons culture, unfortunately not for general education. Plus.... Your name here speaks for itself

@puppykicker WE? I assume that you were not there! And that was not the point here either! You are notorious for your weapons culture, unfortunately not for general education. Plus.... Your name here speaks for itself

@James P I have two daughters, and the younger one I'll call sweet, beautiful, and other complimentary terms, but she's 2. I have a 22 year old daughter and I wouldn't be comfortable saying those things anymore, so you may be right. I'm just hesitant to jump on those bandwagons without proof, considering the recent nonsense that has been going on. Either way, my heart goes out to that child. Anytime a child is done harm like this, I struggle to fight off the thoughts of what their last terrifying moments must have been like.

@James Mainstream I have a daughter.  The first words out of his mouth when he spoke to her in jail "hey gorgeous" is very weird. Might comment on my daughter having a nice hairstyle or a nice outfit but never consider or discuss her level of attractiveness.  Would be interesting to hear what othef dads think about this.

@James Mainstream I have a daughter.  The first words out of his mouth when he spoke to her in jail "hey gorgeous" is very weird. Might comment on my daughter having a nice hairstyle or a nice outfit but never consider or discuss her level of attractiveness.  Would be interesting to hear what othef dads think about this.

@Bec uhhhhh yeah that is always the case so the jury is unbiased. Duhhhhh!

@Bec uhhhhh yeah that is always the case so the jury is unbiased. Duhhhhh!

@Annamaria V. Honestly, that part is just insulting.

I was molested, and I know several people who were molested, raped, attempted to be raped, etc. You would never know unless they told you.

It does NOT mean that we would casually dump a body. That's is nowhere in the normal behavior of ANY victim I have ever known. It wouldn't make a difference if it DID happen, her behavior would still be beyond abhorrent and out of the norm.

That wasn't the problem...they couldn't physically place this murderer psychopath at the crime scene and the charges were 1st degree murder the most hardest crime to prove. The jury never had hard facts beyond believable doubt. So they basically just followed the rules of the law. 🥴

That wasn't the problem...they couldn't physically place this murderer psychopath at the crime scene and the charges were 1st degree murder the most hardest crime to prove. The jury never had hard facts beyond believable doubt. So they basically just followed the rules of the law. 🥴

@Levana Vered Good observation. She's trying to manipulate.

@Levana Vered Good observation. She's trying to manipulate.

@ImginaryHeroine the state pushed for the death penalty
 With no clear cause of death, she was proven innocent and was able to avoid the death penalty
 Now if the state pushed for a life sentence, she could have been proven guilty then, but at this point she is protected by the double jeopardy law and cannot be charged.

@ImginaryHeroine the state pushed for the death penalty
 With no clear cause of death, she was proven innocent and was able to avoid the death penalty
 Now if the state pushed for a life sentence, she could have been proven guilty then, but at this point she is protected by the double jeopardy law and cannot be charged.

@Sarah Marie Most trials hAve 2 phases. The first phase is innocent or guilty.<br>After that, sentencing. They didn't need to kill her. They just needed to cage her for 25 years.

@Sarah Marie Most trials hAve 2 phases. The first phase is innocent or guilty.
After that, sentencing. They didn't need to kill her. They just needed to cage her for 25 years.

I don't agree with what happened, but the jury couldn't send her to death penalty solely because they could not find the exact cause of death<br> Cause of death plays a huge case in sending someone to the chair

I don't agree with what happened, but the jury couldn't send her to death penalty solely because they could not find the exact cause of death
 Cause of death plays a huge case in sending someone to the chair

@gaysy1st When this was still going on, the parents got questioned about the accusation and they acted pretty much like most parents do when they know they raised a compulsive liar. They knew she was facing prison time and chose to let her say whatever her lawyer thought would help her.

 When the trial was over, her father wanted little to nothing to do with her and eventually he told the protesters and media camped out on his lawn that his daughter likes to make up stories and the stories became real to her. Basically, they know she's a liar but if you fight her on it she'll never back down. We saw that with the Zanny story, where she knew that woman's life story... a story she made up.

@Annamaria V. we don’t know if she’s telling the truth... she waited a while before she said anything about her father!  And IF he abused her, would that be a reason for her to kill her little baby?!?! Nothing about this case makes sense 🤷♀🥺. All I know is that a little baby is dead.  I’m a mom amd it breaks my heart.  It’s very difficult to get/be pregnant only to GIVE LIFE to a mini human and to take it away without remorse? to me is horribly sad beyond belief.

@Inspector Spinda And the detectives were too easy on her. They allowed her to flirt & giggle through most interviews. They should have been tougher.

@Inspector Spinda And the detectives were too easy on her. They allowed her to flirt & giggle through most interviews. They should have been tougher.

@Della With her Drink again Senpai Oh of course! 😜

@Della With her Drink again Senpai Oh of course! 😜

@Helena I agree. The detectives allowed her to be giggly & flirty with them. Perhaps someone should have thumped on the table & told her to wise up & take it more seriously. She didn't seem at all frightened, but then she totally ruled her parents, so I guess she never learned to feel at least a little bit fearful of authority.

@Helena I agree. The detectives allowed her to be giggly & flirty with them. Perhaps someone should have thumped on the table & told her to wise up & take it more seriously. She didn't seem at all frightened, but then she totally ruled her parents, so I guess she never learned to feel at least a little bit fearful of authority.

@ImginaryHeroine Hi, I was very interested to read you're comments. Have you any idea what her Father made of the allegations? Did they have any idea that she was going to make the accusation in court, or did it come as a surprise? I can't find anything that gives me the answers.

@ImginaryHeroine Hi, I was very interested to read you're comments. Have you any idea what her Father made of the allegations? Did they have any idea that she was going to make the accusation in court, or did it come as a surprise? I can't find anything that gives me the answers.

@Mike Oxlong They didn't want to appear bigoted in my opinion.

@Mike Oxlong They didn't want to appear bigoted in my opinion.

@Marian Apgar You're absolutely right. It makes you wonder, that when jurors are selected, are they asked if they understand the process AT ALL?

@Marian Apgar You're absolutely right. It makes you wonder, that when jurors are selected, are they asked if they understand the process AT ALL?

@ELFCloudGamer But was that proven? What was her Father's reaction to that accusation?

@ELFCloudGamer But was that proven? What was her Father's reaction to that accusation?

@Mog How on earth do you come to that conclusion?

@Mog How on earth do you come to that conclusion?

I can beat that one. Look at the OJ jury.

I can beat that one. Look at the OJ jury.

I do think that she was guilty, but the death penalty is not the answer. Especially if there is even a shadow of doubt about the person's guilt.

I do think that she was guilty, but the death penalty is not the answer. Especially if there is even a shadow of doubt about the person's guilt.

@Bec I can confirm, but I doubt this was the only factor at play otherwise this case wouldn't even been notable because literally anyone would be able to get away with murder. I think it may have been a combination of the prosecution not being prepared well enough (no confession) and this defense in this case between exceptionally skilled (and also amoral). I've also heard said that CMA paid for her defense with sex. It wasn't discovered until years after the trial though. I think the defense just did a really good job in creating a lot of confusion among the jury.

@puppykicker by the way, what’s is a puppykicker?

@puppykicker by the way, what’s is a puppykicker?

So here is where the tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists reside. Good to know.

So here is where the tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists reside. Good to know.

@Annamaria V. I was thinking exactly the same thing..!

@Annamaria V. I was thinking exactly the same thing..!

@puppykicker Holland is small but has a big influence on the world.  They are THE trading KINGS....by far.  A Rich fukkin country with a powerfull Marine.  Afterall they make te best Marine Deks (Fregatten) of the world.

@puppykicker Holland is small but has a big influence on the world.  They are THE trading KINGS....by far.  A Rich fukkin country with a powerfull Marine.  Afterall they make te best Marine Deks (Fregatten) of the world.

Alot of ppl thought she would get off simple because they had no real evidence.

Alot of ppl thought she would get off simple because they had no real evidence.

@puppykicker ah some good o'll xenophobia

@puppykicker ah some good o'll xenophobia

This is the exact reason why these cases  should be dealt with judge only

This is the exact reason why these cases  should be dealt with judge only

@Holland4evahh"racist" is nothing but an antiwhite slur, dont be antiwhite

@Holland4evahh"racist" is nothing but an antiwhite slur, dont be antiwhite

they weren't any real evident. they did good.

they weren't any real evident. they did good.

@Bec that’s the point. When they interview you, they ask questions about the situation to see how much you know. The whole reason for that is to get an unbiased opinion since knowing about the situation prior can change the way you interpret information. Unfortunately, to not know who Caylee Anthony was in 2008-2009 you had to almost be living under a rock. Because of this, if you weren’t educated on the topic of the missing child, you most likely weren’t educated at all.

@Della With her Drink again Senpai. Hello. It took me a while to understand your post about Casey. After looking up the word Privilege and thinking about what it means, I agree 100% to your post.

@Della With her Drink again Senpai. Hello. It took me a while to understand your post about Casey. After looking up the word Privilege and thinking about what it means, I agree 100% to your post.

Actually a hand full of the jury members would later say that they knew she was guilty, they just wished there was more hard evidence provided by the state prosecuting attorneys. This case was a blemish on the criminal justice system

Actually a hand full of the jury members would later say that they knew she was guilty, they just wished there was more hard evidence provided by the state prosecuting attorneys. This case was a blemish on the criminal justice system

@Annamaria V. you are wrong, her parents did everything right, there was never a sextual assult, all Caseys lies. And the reason we even know that Kaylee is missing was HER PARENTS! They are the one who called police! I watched every single day of that trial and her parents were the only one who had real emotions up there!

@Annamaria V. you are wrong, her parents did everything right, there was never a sextual assult, all Caseys lies. And the reason we even know that Kaylee is missing was HER PARENTS! They are the one who called police! I watched every single day of that trial and her parents were the only one who had real emotions up there!

havent talked with her, but she probably has a high IQ

and most high IQ people "know" (witchcraft, magik, call it whatever, its real)

well played I say! I dont agree with her actions (who knows the true reasoning behind them), but the way soceity is setup at the moment... it pressures highly competent people to do "bAd"

could be a simple sacrifice, could be actions based on regret, idk, is abortion illegal where she did her deed? its all there, just gotta get her to say it

Yeah. There is something about Casey alright. She is completely Nuts!

Yeah. There is something about Casey alright. She is completely Nuts!

We had the benefit of a through uncontested analysis. It’s incorrect to lay judgement with insufficient information

We had the benefit of a through uncontested analysis. It’s incorrect to lay judgement with insufficient information

@Violeta Pelzman I will never understand the conviction of Sandra Melgar.

@Violeta Pelzman I will never understand the conviction of Sandra Melgar.

@Annamaria V. They never proved that, there was absolutely nothing proving any of the conspiracy theories of the defense, it was all smoke and mirrors to create confusion and doubt

@Annamaria V. They never proved that, there was absolutely nothing proving any of the conspiracy theories of the defense, it was all smoke and mirrors to create confusion and doubt

@Annamaria V. my thoughts exactly! How is the father not even in prison or done time for what he did to his own daughter? Did that become another court case in its own? Like.. what the fuck..

@Annamaria V. my thoughts exactly! How is the father not even in prison or done time for what he did to his own daughter? Did that become another court case in its own? Like.. what the fuck..

I know that this is a joke but out of curiosity... is it even possible to have an IQ below 10? xD

I know that this is a joke but out of curiosity... is it even possible to have an IQ below 10? xD

I want to know what she's doing now? Like how much did she have to change her appearance so that she's not noticed in public?!

I want to know what she's doing now? Like how much did she have to change her appearance so that she's not noticed in public?!

@puppykicker You never fought for anything

@puppykicker You never fought for anything

king of fries : the king will rise to the top

@Annamaria V. Given the fact that Caseay lied about everything else, it is also likely that the assault part was a lie.

@Annamaria V. Given the fact that Caseay lied about everything else, it is also likely that the assault part was a lie.

@bec

Yes, that's how it always works. Attorneys get to strike a number of jurors, and they tend to remove jurors who are educated, or opinionated. They want people who won't hold a bias against their client, and also jurors who can be easily persuaded.

There are both pros and cons to this. In this case, it was a disaster unfortunately.

@some idiot wtf are you even going on about?

@some idiot wtf are you even going on about?

I believe she batted her eyelashes and they swooned

I believe she batted her eyelashes and they swooned

no offense to florida, but the fact the case/trial took place in florida eliminated roughly 95% of the world from the jury pool so it was pretty probable at that point

no offense to florida, but the fact the case/trial took place in florida eliminated roughly 95% of the world from the jury pool so it was pretty probable at that point

In the jury's defence, the could not say she's guilty because of the lack of evidence. We all know she did it, but there needs to be proof. She got lucky

In the jury's defence, the could not say she's guilty because of the lack of evidence. We all know she did it, but there needs to be proof. She got lucky

That wouldbe like winning the lottery 10 times in a row...

That wouldbe like winning the lottery 10 times in a row...

Her lawyer is good I was thinking myself they can’t make her guilty under the law now... the other lawyer probably could of done better and the investigation part and the interrogation where not good and firm enough...

Her lawyer is good I was thinking myself they can’t make her guilty under the law now... the other lawyer probably could of done better and the investigation part and the interrogation where not good and firm enough...

@Ragnarok Global IQ is around 83-86 as far as I know. Don't remember the exact number.  <br>See Becker's updated IQ scores of 2019.

@Ragnarok Global IQ is around 83-86 as far as I know. Don't remember the exact number.
See Becker's updated IQ scores of 2019.

@resurrexi ? Republicans have around 0.37 sd higher IQs than democrats on average.  <br>See N. Carl; Intelligence 44 (2014)

@resurrexi ? Republicans have around 0.37 sd higher IQs than democrats on average.
See N. Carl; Intelligence 44 (2014)

Lol it would be in Florida...no offense but yes, Florida....

Lol it would be in Florida...no offense but yes, Florida....

I believe that low of a score is only achieved with the affliction of severe down syndrome. The jury were not stupid imo but extremely weak minded bc they got manipulated by that lawyer so hard.

I believe that low of a score is only achieved with the affliction of severe down syndrome. The jury were not stupid imo but extremely weak minded bc they got manipulated by that lawyer so hard.

Shimmer  But can the judge overrule the jury’s decision though?

Shimmer  But can the judge overrule the jury’s decision though?

They wanted to go home. If they had found her guilty they would have  had to remain sequestered for the punishment faze.

They wanted to go home. If they had found her guilty they would have  had to remain sequestered for the punishment faze.

@Bec this goes onto both ends tho, the defence attorney and the public attorney get the same rights. This is merely the down side of a jury conviction system. U can play them on emotions, a judge would look at the evidence.

@Bec this goes onto both ends tho, the defence attorney and the public attorney get the same rights. This is merely the down side of a jury conviction system. U can play them on emotions, a judge would look at the evidence.

At least one juror I heard demonstrated the fact that she did not understand that circumstantial evidence (and in this case overwhelming circumstantial evidence) is adequate proof for a first-degree conviction.  She kept saying that there was no "proof."  She seemed to believe that the only kind of proof you could convict for was forensic evidence, and this is definitely not the case.  This should have been better explained to the jury by the court and the prosecutors.

The only people in that courtroom with an IQ under 10 were the prosecutors. The Jury did their job exactly as they should. Yes, she almost definitely killed her child but the prosecution should've provided SUBSTANTIAL evidence that PROVED that she, BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT, killed her child, especially when faced with capital punishment. It really is a shame that she's walking free but there's no one to blame but the police for not gathering more evidence and the prosecution for doing a shite job. Jury had no choice. 3rd year law student btw.

@Annamaria V. that was obviously a lie, and you fell for it! If it was true and had anything to do with the case, they would have brought her dad up for questioning and the case would have gone a totally different route.

@Annamaria V. that was obviously a lie, and you fell for it! If it was true and had anything to do with the case, they would have brought her dad up for questioning and the case would have gone a totally different route.

@Holland4evahh You aren't wrong. If you factor in the entire world population the theoretical min IQ is about 4.

@Holland4evahh You aren't wrong. If you factor in the entire world population the theoretical min IQ is about 4.

Don't blame the jury, blame the prosecutor.

Don't blame the jury, blame the prosecutor.

The prosecution lawyer was really bad.  Incompetent.

The prosecution lawyer was really bad.  Incompetent.

It shows the real flaw in the jury system, that people who are not very bright can be so easily manipulated.

It shows the real flaw in the jury system, that people who are not very bright can be so easily manipulated.

@Joshi Nirav Yes. You have a lawyer as your defense and if its a good lawyer, your attorney may win the case. The judge has to decide if you're guilty or not. Before that, you're innocent until proven guilty.

@Joshi Nirav Yes. You have a lawyer as your defense and if its a good lawyer, your attorney may win the case. The judge has to decide if you're guilty or not. Before that, you're innocent until proven guilty.

I never really understood USA jury system. So basically even if there is compelling evidence, if the Jury says not-guilty, the person goes free?

I never really understood USA jury system. So basically even if there is compelling evidence, if the Jury says not-guilty, the person goes free?

@Mathilde Tanghe good lawyer... that’s 85% of the reason why she got away

@Mathilde Tanghe good lawyer... that’s 85% of the reason why she got away

No shit

I remembered they were seeking the death penalty that's where the problem lies
They should have taken that off the table

No shit

I remembered they were seeking the death penalty that's where the problem lies
They should have taken that off the table

@Ali's- Anime If that's the best sentence construction you're capable of then I don't think you should be calling people idiots lol.

@Ali's- Anime If that's the best sentence construction you're capable of then I don't think you should be calling people idiots lol.

The defense attorneys picked black people for a reason.

The defense attorneys picked black people for a reason.

This is crazy. She basically so indifferent ... she makes OJ look innocent. I mean her searches were more than enough.

This is crazy. She basically so indifferent ... she makes OJ look innocent. I mean her searches were more than enough.

tbf the defense attorney wasn't wrong. they didn't prove it.

tbf the defense attorney wasn't wrong. they didn't prove it.

The same person (the 13th one) brought them together

The same person (the 13th one) brought them together

ya'll messin' with Terminology so much, it's only 2 months later, and the man changed his name lol

ya'll messin' with Terminology so much, it's only 2 months later, and the man changed his name lol

Being manipulated by a very advanced liar doesn’t make them dumb. They’re naive there‘s a difference. It’s so sad to watch. She clearly doesn’t know how to love and care for anyone but herself. Also she is not aware of the impact of her actions and words on other people, maybe because she‘s totally disconnected with the world itself and her feelings about it.

@Annamaria V. - She probably made that up in order to get sympathy. Her relationship with her father, as shown at the jail, was that of a daughter who is close to her father.. not a daughter who was traumatized by, or fears, her father.

@Annamaria V. - She probably made that up in order to get sympathy. Her relationship with her father, as shown at the jail, was that of a daughter who is close to her father.. not a daughter who was traumatized by, or fears, her father.

Because the theory of the IQ is made up by the same people who stands behind the Evil of the World.

Because the theory of the IQ is made up by the same people who stands behind the Evil of the World.

So she killed her kid because she wanted to go clubbing. Then the jury let her go clubbing.

So she killed her kid because she wanted to go clubbing. Then the jury let her go clubbing.

That's what I'm trying to figure out  ??

That's what I'm trying to figure out  ??

One of my biggest embarrassed moments to say I'm from FL honestly and I was only 21 at the time of trail!!

One of my biggest embarrassed moments to say I'm from FL honestly and I was only 21 at the time of trail!!

@Bec what the DA did wrong was choose to go with murder *first*. because she was acquitted, "double jeopardy" applies so even if they discovered video evidence of the murder, they can't charge her again. they were too trusting of their jury selection and humans in general. i believe the jury would have gone for manslaughter.

@Bec what the DA did wrong was choose to go with murder *first*. because she was acquitted, "double jeopardy" applies so even if they discovered video evidence of the murder, they can't charge her again. they were too trusting of their jury selection and humans in general. i believe the jury would have gone for manslaughter.

the scary thing is, i read a profile of the jurors after watching this, and they sound exactly like a certain subset of MAGA people. this isn't about politics. but there is a "type" of person that lacks empathy beyond their own loved ones. also paranoid about "false flags" etc. it seems like the jury was made of the same people who call Sandy Hook a hoax. scary as hell

@Bec Explains how Killary Clinton keeps getting away with criminal charges

@Bec Explains how Killary Clinton keeps getting away with criminal charges

@puppykicker its funny because as soon as those cowards need help, who do they run to

@puppykicker its funny because as soon as those cowards need help, who do they run to

Right. How did that happen? Someone explain please!

Right. How did that happen? Someone explain please!

I think that opening statement with the dad's pens in her mouth thing really did it. Casey was broken before she had the kid

I think that opening statement with the dad's pens in her mouth thing really did it. Casey was broken before she had the kid

It wasn’t the jury’s fault I watched the whole trial and the Prosecutor sucked! Totally unprepared. They should have waited to arrest her and built their case past circumstantial. Especially since DNA was becoming a thing jurors wanted proof or dna. Her Lawyer tore up all there case by explaining away what could have happened doesn’t mean that is what happened. Thats when she threw her dad under the bus claiming she thinks he killed her. And then the jury was only offered 1st degree murder and to prove that they must by law have facts. If they had charged her with 2nd degree she would just be getting out of jail today!

@Terminology! I used to live in Florida, I can confirm, my IQ droped 2 points the 2 months I lived there

@Terminology! I used to live in Florida, I can confirm, my IQ droped 2 points the 2 months I lived there

The jury was correct for the charge. The prosecution screwed up, not the jury.

The jury was correct for the charge. The prosecution screwed up, not the jury.

nah this lawyer is just fucking amazing , he deserves the win here.

nah this lawyer is just fucking amazing , he deserves the win here.

Its called - pay offs or "jury pressure"!  Come on people, can you not put the pieces together at all????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its called - pay offs or "jury pressure"!  Come on people, can you not put the pieces together at all????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@Terminology! There are only 12 people in Florida?

@Terminology! There are only 12 people in Florida?

Did they fall for her production? Where is the best trial footage? I’d like to watch it.

Did they fall for her production? Where is the best trial footage? I’d like to watch it.

@Annamaria V. I don’t think he actually did it

@Annamaria V. I don’t think he actually did it

The little red haired girl from across the street

Hahahaha that's so funny. I totally agree with you right there

Hahahaha that's so funny. I totally agree with you right there

@James Mainstream then it's rather disgusting. I would never support my child/sibling after this for sure!

@James Mainstream then it's rather disgusting. I would never support my child/sibling after this for sure!

@Angel Ig someone who can take a joke, ily

@Angel Ig someone who can take a joke, ily

what a perfect way to decribe the jury, i couln't find one..

what a perfect way to decribe the jury, i couln't find one..

My guess is that they are all radical feminists.

My guess is that they are all radical feminists.

@jo gr Exactly! This seems to be a trend with high profile cases, as if the DA's office needs to show that they are doing their job. Instead of justice, an over zealous prosecution results in a waste of 3 years of court time, taxpayer resource and reduces the publics confidence in the system. We still have the best system in the world, but people easily forget that it prioritizes the freedom of citizens and reducing incorrect guilty verdicts.

@Annamaria V. he didn't do anything it was lies cooked up by her attorney  to get jury sympathy. .

@Annamaria V. he didn't do anything it was lies cooked up by her attorney  to get jury sympathy. .

The probability of there being a human both capable of taking the test ... and unable to score as high as 10 ... is infinitesimal at best.

The probability of there being a human both capable of taking the test ... and unable to score as high as 10 ... is infinitesimal at best.

@Terminology! Not surprising since majority of floridians are trump supporters

@Terminology! Not surprising since majority of floridians are trump supporters

I've heard through several locals that Florida has no room left in the prison or jail so to take care of that is to find all criminals not guilty for the next few years, seems to be working for the ones with just a little money.

I've heard through several locals that Florida has no room left in the prison or jail so to take care of that is to find all criminals not guilty for the next few years, seems to be working for the ones with just a little money.

@Vandalore LMAO... I've came across this channel very recently and indeed one thing that drew my attention is how the absolute majority of these stories come out of there.

@Vandalore LMAO... I've came across this channel very recently and indeed one thing that drew my attention is how the absolute majority of these stories come out of there.

I know!! She just blatantly lied about so many things, now she’s talking about having more kids.

I know!! She just blatantly lied about so many things, now she’s talking about having more kids.

@Great Home watch the movie runaway jury. It's exactly about this

@Great Home watch the movie runaway jury. It's exactly about this

Wait... Brendan Schaub wasn't one of them

Wait... Brendan Schaub wasn't one of them

puppykicker you spend trillions more on military than any other country (mostly allies).  Maybe you should spend more on your education system? Also you lost against Vietnam...

puppykicker you spend trillions more on military than any other country (mostly allies).  Maybe you should spend more on your education system? Also you lost against Vietnam...

Literally she got away with killing ger child just like that! how stupid are they

Literally she got away with killing ger child just like that! how stupid are they

Lol there is something called MONEY(bribery), good lawyer, and clout... It can literally get you of anything.

Lol there is something called MONEY(bribery), good lawyer, and clout... It can literally get you of anything.

@Holland4evahh Europe is going to be a religious continent again very soon whether you like it or not.

@Holland4evahh Europe is going to be a religious continent again very soon whether you like it or not.

Annamaria V. But do you actually believe anything that comes out of anyone’s mouth on that side of the room????

Annamaria V. But do you actually believe anything that comes out of anyone’s mouth on that side of the room????

@Holland4evahh
So says someone from a country that couldn't fight its way out of a wet paper bag.

Next time we should leave you to the Krauts.

@Holland4evahh
So says someone from a country that couldn't fight its way out of a wet paper bag.

Next time we should leave you to the Krauts.

@Annamaria V. She accused her father and brother, but my guess is that she was just trying to get a victim card.

@Annamaria V. She accused her father and brother, but my guess is that she was just trying to get a victim card.

and they were all on Sandra Melgar's jury as well

and they were all on Sandra Melgar's jury as well

To be honest it boils down to jury selection. The prosecution needed to make sure there was at least one person that would be a strong foreman.  I was one on a case where the defence played on the emotions of the jury. Luckily I was elected foreman and I kept the discussion on the evidence.

To be honest it boils down to jury selection. The prosecution needed to make sure there was at least one person that would be a strong foreman.  I was one on a case where the defence played on the emotions of the jury. Luckily I was elected foreman and I kept the discussion on the evidence.

i was on jury duty once (i wasn't selected to be part of the actual jury) and it is blatantly obvious that the attorneys involved get to choose which jurors they want to be part of the final jury. and they tend to go for jurors who don't know a lot in general or at the very least uneducated about the topic at hand. disclaimer - just from my personal experience and observation.

Terminology! <br>As a Floridian, I can confirm this to be true👍🏼

Terminology!
As a Floridian, I can confirm this to be true👍🏼


I will never understand how Casey was found not guilty when the evidence was so obvious. It’s disgusting to me how she roams free and that poor baby had to die. Internet searches about suffocation, not calling the police, partying for weeks, lying to friends, family AND investigators?? Makes no sense why she was allowed to go free. I’ve followed this case for years and it still baffles me.

I personally agree to what you're feeling Ma'am. And feelings aside, the presented circumstantial evidence is almost a dead give-away of what really happened to the child Kaylee. But that defense attorney sure knows what he is doing by raising an argument of technicality. What happened to the child Kaylee can never be proven without a shadow of a doubt unless there are eyewitnesses to compound with the circumstantial evidences like the duct tape, the internet search about suffocation and so on and so forth, and more so if they can coaxed Casey the mom into a confession. But this is where I have my contempt for most lawyers. Because, based on the circumstantial evidence only, although there is no eyewitness, confession or camera to record the thing, the circumstantial evidence clearly points out that the child, Kaylee was murdered, and that Casey the mom, just by her indifference to that reality is already enough evidence in most states and even here back in my country. And to see that lawyers willingly defend a person with this type of case is appalling and a foolproof evidence that most lawyers do lie for a living. On a parting note, let me quote Detective Sherlock Holmes regarding facts and circumstantial evidence:

"When you have removed all the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth".

@Andrew Oost yeah but white people usually get little to no jail time; this video is an example.

@Andrew Oost yeah but white people usually get little to no jail time; this video is an example.

@DavoInMelbourne I didn't realize OJ and Cosby were white. Thanks for "enlightening" all of us! 👌

@DavoInMelbourne I didn't realize OJ and Cosby were white. Thanks for "enlightening" all of us! 👌

There's always street justice. Wouldn't be hard to find the murderer. You could take matters into your own hands if you were really that upset about it.

There's always street justice. Wouldn't be hard to find the murderer. You could take matters into your own hands if you were really that upset about it.

@Tommy 50377 intersectionality lmao. you aint ever heard of white woman tears?

@Tommy 50377 intersectionality lmao. you aint ever heard of white woman tears?

Makes me wonder how much the Jury got paid, because wow. Just.. wow.

Makes me wonder how much the Jury got paid, because wow. Just.. wow.

she didn't go to jail for this?? how stupid can they be, its so obvious, why else would she lie If she "wasn't guilty"??

she didn't go to jail for this?? how stupid can they be, its so obvious, why else would she lie If she "wasn't guilty"??

it's called sleeping with your attorney, apparently ://

it's called sleeping with your attorney, apparently ://

@DavoInMelbourne what about OJ ? I thought he was black……???

@DavoInMelbourne what about OJ ? I thought he was black……???

@Ria Hill Obviously you don't know of any, regular cases involving non-famous people basically never get famous. There were over 20k murders in America last year, do you really think you'll hear about every single one of them?

And quit talking about 'blackness' as if it's some nebulous, spiritual concept. OJ's skin was black, so he was black.

@Alykat Haha thats a bold theory you got the evidence for that?

@Alykat Haha thats a bold theory you got the evidence for that?

@yen aponte he has connections to the jury cause he 's an ex cop? 🤣

@yen aponte he has connections to the jury cause he 's an ex cop? 🤣

Because she has connections. Her daddy is an ex cop

Because she has connections. Her daddy is an ex cop

@DavoInMelbourne Yay race-baiting!

You might at least say it's because she's an attractive young woman and be somewhat on the right path...

@DavoInMelbourne Yay race-baiting!

You might at least say it's because she's an attractive young woman and be somewhat on the right path...

@Stan D that literally has nothing to do with what i said, it wasn't about the child's race but hers

@Stan D that literally has nothing to do with what i said, it wasn't about the child's race but hers

@Tommy 50377 maybe not about race..But seriously what's wrong with America. it's clear she is guilty.

@Tommy 50377 maybe not about race..But seriously what's wrong with America. it's clear she is guilty.

@Gaymer No. Laws protect defendants in that they don't have to testify against themselves. Same with family and your wife/husband.

@Gaymer No. Laws protect defendants in that they don't have to testify against themselves. Same with family and your wife/husband.

@Gaymer it absolutely is illegal to lie to police, especially during an investigation. Are you high?

@Gaymer it absolutely is illegal to lie to police, especially during an investigation. Are you high?

@Tommy 50377 had she been black under the same circumstances she would've gone to jail immediately.

@Tommy 50377 had she been black under the same circumstances she would've gone to jail immediately.

The prosecutors overcharged her.  The jury could not convict of premediated murder based on the evidence.  The prosecution gambled by overcharging in hopes of a plea deal and they lost.

@Gaymer racism is apart of every race just to let u know

@Gaymer racism is apart of every race just to let u know

@Alykat Curious...why did u capitalism Black people but not brown people?<br>Why do you view brown people as inferior?

@Alykat Curious...why did u capitalism Black people but not brown people?
Why do you view brown people as inferior?

@Alykat don't look up how the ADL was formed then

@Alykat don't look up how the ADL was formed then

@Gaymer YOU SAID IT CAN'T BE IGNORED BUT IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CASE! Saying that "oh she got off because she is white" means nothing. It's no different than if I said "oh she got off because she is a woman" or "she got off because she is attractive". You need to back such statements up with PROOF not just speculation.

@Gaymer She served time for lying to the police, over the time she would have for the charge actually while awaiting trial. Since she was found not guilty (she should have gotten a needle in her arm), the judge considered it time served and she walked out the court room free. Disgusting in my opinion

Circumstantial evidence does not equal guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Circumstantial evidence does not equal guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

seems like you haven't followed the justice system at all though

seems like you haven't followed the justice system at all though

@Tommy 50377

Seems to me like you're in the position of a perceived disadvantage (being male), therefore you blame sexism, and because you aren't black are known a position of advantage there it's easiest for your dissonance to accept "sexism" as opposed to racism. The law is definitively more hard on black people than white people, more so than it is on men vs women.

@DavoInMelbourne what country are you from? Did we flatten it in recent history?

@DavoInMelbourne what country are you from? Did we flatten it in recent history?

@Zachary Drummond  You make a fair point , but the fact that what you say is true is still sad because even though the American Justice system is is better than other countries doesn't mean it's actually good. A gold turd might be better than a bronze turd but it's still a turd. And that's kind of the point of my comment. I just believe it can be greatly   improved on.

@gokuhawks14 It is one of the best in the world.

@gokuhawks14 It is one of the best in the world.

@Bettermetal830 Better to assume that then realize the truth of what people are actually like, I suppose.

@Bettermetal830 Better to assume that then realize the truth of what people are actually like, I suppose.

@DavoInMelbourne over an hour of video and race was not mentioned once. Maybe get a clue next time instead of fishing for dopamine upvotes.

@DavoInMelbourne over an hour of video and race was not mentioned once. Maybe get a clue next time instead of fishing for dopamine upvotes.

@V P The idea that Casey Anthony got off <b>because</b> she's white is what's ridiculous. You speak without nuance.

@V P The idea that Casey Anthony got off *because* she's white is what's ridiculous. You speak without nuance.

I assume everyone in this comment section is trolling…

I assume everyone in this comment section is trolling…

@DavoInMelbourne You mean less shallow, right? By all accounts, literal witch hunts were a lot more shallow than the modern world.

@DavoInMelbourne You mean less shallow, right? By all accounts, literal witch hunts were a lot more shallow than the modern world.

I believe that’s obstruction of justice, so yes a crime, but I don’t know law 🤷🏻♀

I believe that’s obstruction of justice, so yes a crime, but I don’t know law 🤷🏻♀

It’s because the body decompose and they didn’t have enough Evidence to convict in a court of law. Obviously she did it, but if there’s no way to prove it, you don’t have a case. There was the lies and the partying, but the whole case was a joke. The police and everyone involved could have handled it better

@Gaymer racism wouldn't be a problem if there was only one race.

@Gaymer racism wouldn't be a problem if there was only one race.

@Pet my head I assume you're talking about Vince Li? I completely disagree with the verdict, you're correct that the flaws there are legally systemic regarding the mentally unstable. That said, that's apples to oranges man. Not just a different country, different circumstances. No not every juror or prosecutor is racist in the States, systemic racism does not operate in every courtroom and corner of the country. It does exist though, especially in urban areas with highly concentrated clusters of low income, low education people of color. Because of longstanding systemic racial biases, privatized prison systems, investor interest and lobbyist groups, the US has not only the highest population of incarcerated individuals of any developed nation, it also incarcerates urban centered minorities at twice the rate. Given this, there is some merit to the notion that being a white woman holds a higher bias grain of doubt in some counties. Look no further than the blatant biases that exist in family courts regarding divorcees and visitation.

its america tho its hillarious ! better than tv

its america tho its hillarious ! better than tv

Not sure if that evidence was presented in court or discover after. If it was presented in court then I am surprised it wasn’t a mistrial, but defiantly shouldn’t have been not guilty.

@DavoInMelbourne OJ Simpson: famous white footballer.

@DavoInMelbourne OJ Simpson: famous white footballer.

@Tommy 50377 Bud it's definitely a race thing. She was set free because of white privilege - she is not seen as 'evil' by jurors and the court because she is not seen as 'a threat', as many non-white people are. Brittney Poolaw, a native American woman was imprisoned for 3 years for a MISCARRIAGE purely out of her power. Shanesha Taylor, a black woman, received 18 years of probation for leaving her kids in a car while she had a job interview. This is not about race, but her race was 100% a privilege in her sentencing, and if she was Native American, Black or non-white, she would have gotten a guilty verdict. This is the privilege that comes with being white, you don't notice these things. Take a look around every now and then and realise what's happening in the world.

@Gaymer how the hell she wasn't charged with about thirty cases of obstruction is a mystery to me. They could have charged her with those first just to get her in a cell and then build a stronger 1st degree murder case.

@DavoInMelbourne The fact that you blame it on race instead of how broken the judicial system is really speaks a lot

@DavoInMelbourne The fact that you blame it on race instead of how broken the judicial system is really speaks a lot

@Tommy 50377 everything in this world is quite literally about race. you people made it so.

@Tommy 50377 everything in this world is quite literally about race. you people made it so.

She went free? (I skipped the ending after the whole sexual assault prosecution part). FUCKING HELL this is why I hate the world and hope to die this year; it's too fucked up.

Thank god the legal system doesnt care if you understand or like it. Fact of the matter is its better for a murderer to walk then for an innocent person go to prison for murder...

@DavoInMelbourne I bet you still think juicy smollett is innocent or that browder was telling the truth.

@DavoInMelbourne I bet you still think juicy smollett is innocent or that browder was telling the truth.

@UCstPGVtZ7bvC4rMdDgyxsXg hey lady, you know who OJ Simpson is?

@UCstPGVtZ7bvC4rMdDgyxsXg hey lady, you know who OJ Simpson is?

Unfortunately it is difficult to convict somebody based on knowledge or “knowing” what occurred with circumstantial evidence versus have physical evidence like DNA, video, confession, finger prints, forensic hair (like the single hair being consistent to hair on Caylee’s brush was found trunk of Casey’s car but the process used was new and research was being done on if that hair banding can occur on a living person) or fabric (like without finding fingerprints/dna of a suspect on the duct tape used on Caylee but was found to match with the duct tape on Casey’s dads metal fuel can) matches of what was used and what’s found at crime scene or on a victim. They have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt it was Casey and could not possibly be anybody else. I concur and strongly believe she is guilty but the law clearly states believing is not good enough to help prevent innocent people getting set up or convicted wrongfully.

@Gaymer yes it is illegal to lie to officers and investigators, and that’s the charges they found Casey guilty of, and at the end of her trial, gave her a 4 year sentence with time served from initial arrest in July 2008 to sentencing July 7, 2011 minus a cpl weeks from bonding out twice but re-arrested soon after each time and only served 10 more days and was freed July 17, 2011.

@DavoInMelbourne I'm black and even I am disgusted by what you said.

@DavoInMelbourne I'm black and even I am disgusted by what you said.

@Nicole It's not a matter of bias. He just said if there is not enough evidence, he couldn't, on a good conscience, name someone guilty.

@Nicole It's not a matter of bias. He just said if there is not enough evidence, he couldn't, on a good conscience, name someone guilty.

@Gaymer she was charged guilty of lying to the police actually

@Gaymer she was charged guilty of lying to the police actually

@Kim Durig yep, agreed. In this ever increasingly shallow and superficial world we live in, you’re far more likely to be acquitted the more attractive you are.

@Tommy 50377 Sorry, only just noticed this.   Apology accepted. Yes I know, it's an emotional topic so sometimes our initial feeling can get the better our more rational selves.  Yes, agreed, if it was the father rather than the mother, it could well have been a very different outcome.

@Tommy 50377 it’s not everything but clearly your response shows it’s a big deal to you and you’d rather ignore it all together

@Tommy 50377 it’s not everything but clearly your response shows it’s a big deal to you and you’d rather ignore it all together

@Nicole How would they know if I am a biased juror?

@Nicole How would they know if I am a biased juror?

@Tommy 50377 you literally cannot analyze this case without at least taking a moment to consider this. In America there is a bias towards black people in the criminal justice system. I don't see how you could think that this case would have ended the same way as it did if the mother was black.

@Iam Cleaver that’s why if you’re a biased juror, they won’t accept you for one of these intense cases. They’ll summon you for minor offenses like traffic

@Iam Cleaver that’s why if you’re a biased juror, they won’t accept you for one of these intense cases. They’ll summon you for minor offenses like traffic

To be honest, if I were a member of the jury, there is no evidence in hell that would convince me to name a 22 year old girl guilty if it means that doing so would get her the death penalty. That would make me no less of a murderer.

@Lana c: Don't look at my search history, no telling what you would pull up. I can't imagine anything else more private and embarrassing.

@Lana c: Don't look at my search history, no telling what you would pull up. I can't imagine anything else more private and embarrassing.

@Gaymer yes, she was found guilty for that and sentenced a fine and 4 years a However it was ruled out as time served because she was in jail for 3 years with credit for good behavior.

Do you know what forensics found after the autopsy, or if they did any research on the car that was reported as smelling like a rotting corpse? They never said anything about it in this video other than the first mention of it, which kind of tells me that the investigation just ignored it entirely. I've looked at the little amount of evidence and the mother's behavior, and everything points to her killing her daughter.

@DavoInMelbourne it’s way more than race

@DavoInMelbourne it’s way more than race

@DJ Yoshi She's not Jewish, to my understanding.

@DJ Yoshi She's not Jewish, to my understanding.

Thing is that there is no real direct evidence in that case. Her google search history can be seen as a circumstancial evidence but it's not enough to send you behind bars if you have a good lawyer. Of course all her lies with imaginary people and stuff are fucked up but it doesn't prove anything either. Moral of the story : Never plead guilty and if you are guilty don't ever tell them anything that could help the investigation. Better of serving them some BS stories or just STFU.

@Gaymer Lying to a police officer is a misdemeanor so nothing really significant but in that case she told so many BS that they could have charged her with obstruction of justice.

Emotions aside, she simply had a damn good lawyer and the prosecution made mistake after mistake. You can't send someone in prison just because of emotions and feelings. Yeah, we all know she killed her daughter but you needed hard evidence to convict her for it. The jury did the right thing and the only one left to blame in the end was the lame prosecution.

the system is all sorts of fucked. i hate this world.

the system is all sorts of fucked. i hate this world.

@Tommy 50377 it’s so easy to say that when you’re white Tommy 🙂

@Tommy 50377 it’s so easy to say that when you’re white Tommy 🙂

If it was a man he wouldn't have gotten away with it

If it was a man he wouldn't have gotten away with it

@slayne You think the prosecution let her off easy?
They were constantly trying to portray her as a habitual liar and party girl who couldn't care less about her daughter's life.
Granted, all of that is true, but this is the prosecution's fucking job, to prove the defendant's guilt. Why you would complain about the prosecution trying to paint a defendant as violent and aggressive is insane to me.
Also, do you have any proof that white women without any prior convictions get off easier than black women without any prior convictions?

Plus if your kid drowned accidentaly and you were disposing of the body why would you ductape her airways?? This was proven beyond reasonable doubt because the facts speak for themselves

@Davoln Melbourne

What are you're thoughts about Andrew Coffee IV who faced six charges in connection with the raid on his Gifford home by police.

Two cops shot & killed,his girl who really was in bed,killed by crossfire.

Andrew Coffee, a black man was found not Guilty & free same day as kyle rittenhouse.

I must agree, i since yesterday after seeing this. I am perplexed, this person clear as day is a killer.

Her body language, her lies for a month,the google searches, the interview etc.

The childs remains found,duct tape over the mouth and nose. How can a jury not see this alone,as a severe real issue,how? They really believed the made up story, throwing her dad under the bus....as a phedo too.

Im blown away,just sad for the child. Shes a real victim with no peace or justice.

@Alykat which black woman was chafged for this?

@Alykat which black woman was chafged for this?

@DavoInMelbourne Firstly, let me apologize for being rude. I had just finished watching the video and for hopefully obvious reasons was a bit.. <i>annoyed.</i> In this case, I think sexism has a lot more to do with it then racism. It's a known fact that women get off easier constantly in court, and I'm thinking it's the same thing here. "She could never, a mother could never harm her child like that!". Swap the race, and I doubt anything would change. But if you swapped the gender, I'm willing to bet she'd be convicted in a heartbeat.

@DavoInMelbourne Firstly, let me apologize for being rude. I had just finished watching the video and for hopefully obvious reasons was a bit.. _annoyed._ In this case, I think sexism has a lot more to do with it then racism. It's a known fact that women get off easier constantly in court, and I'm thinking it's the same thing here. "She could never, a mother could never harm her child like that!". Swap the race, and I doubt anything would change. But if you swapped the gender, I'm willing to bet she'd be convicted in a heartbeat.

It’s America and she’s white. That’s why.

It’s America and she’s white. That’s why.

is it not illegal in itself to lie to the police and investigators?

is it not illegal in itself to lie to the police and investigators?

Literally!! Like how fucking dumb were all of the people involved to see the searched on GOOGLE how to suffocate someone RIGHT BEFORE HER DAUGHTER WENT MISSING and still think she's innocent?? 😭 there has gotta be some sort of corruption going on istg


Casey’s cold response to her best friend crying over Caylee’s disappearance was infuriating. Christina was more concerned and heartbroken over Caylee than her own mother. Awful.

I hope Christina can get over this tragedy, bc between her parents and Casey herself..well ... They just don't GIVE a sh*t

The Breakfast Clubber well obviously she has to be one of the two 😂

Casey’s behavior in this situation shows her innocence or...

involvement in Calley’s disappearance!!!