She’s was so guilty. I can’t believe she’s walking free. This one pissed me off.

She’s was so guilty. I can’t believe she’s walking free. This one pissed me off.

@Suzann Ortega it’s been 5 years suzann, get over it

@Suzann Ortega it’s been 5 years suzann, get over it

παιδί του φεγγαριού ☽

@Mirai Nikki honestly she doesn’t look attractive to me but usually women of beauty standards (which she pretty much is) usually walk out with basically a slap on the wrist

@Jonn Jonnn were you a part of the jury?

@Jonn Jonnn were you a part of the jury?

@ryuzakikun96 I can see why if not for two key things. Why was she googling fool proof methods of suffocation and why did Caylee’s body have tape over the mouth and nose? The body sitting in her trunk for so long could make it seem like it was accidental, I give you that. But, if she’s not guilty of first degree, third degree is indisputable.

@jane doe lmao, she's not pretty, what are you talking about

@jane doe lmao, she's not pretty, what are you talking about

There’s no way she walks in public in peace

There’s no way she walks in public in peace

@evert sure, my point is that these are two separate matters, that's what I meant

@Paula Suarez There is literally no reason for the grandfather to face trial. Ridiculous to claim such a thing when there is zero evidence presented and it's clear that this is just used to scapegoat her behavior.

@ryuzakikun96 she wrote in her journal she was happy about the “decision” she made. So she’s saying she DECIDED to kill her daughter

Just awful that a child murderer goes free because she’s a woman and not a man. We see this all the time.

turn to Christ and repent before it’s too late because He loves us so much He died for us and God His Father raised Him from the dead and loves us 🥰

@jane doe gotta have very VERY low standards to let THAT get away with murder.

@jane doe gotta have very VERY low standards to let THAT get away with murder.

@Paula Suarez Never try to figure out acts of the criminally insane.
Logic has no place there.
The sticker applied on top of the tape on tiddler's mouth is the empty gesture of someone who looks human but has lost the ability to feel higher human emotions

@psychic crocodile she just had no makeup on thats how all girls look like lol.... you would never say that to a random person but because you know she is accused of murder you say that

@ItsPeytn <br>yeah it's basically how OJ got away with it too; everyone knows she and he are murders but you can't provide any clear evidence that they did it they get away with it

@ItsPeytn
yeah it's basically how OJ got away with it too; everyone knows she and he are murders but you can't provide any clear evidence that they did it they get away with it

Ppl really don’t understand law. Innocent until PROVEN guilty. It wasn’t proven that she was guilty of killing her daughter.

She just started her own private investigation firm recently. I can’t believe she still has a job.

She literally lied so much at the begining.

She literally lied so much at the begining.

The Google searches about suffocation and everything too. There was so much evidence.

@Themistokles Theodosopoulos lemme think about that....nope.

@Themistokles Theodosopoulos lemme think about that....nope.

@Brainy Smurf ... Litasha Staunch .. not sure I spelled her name right .. but she's in jail

@jane doe it was the jury not having the stomach for a death penalty conviction. Imagine if you had to actually be the one who executed her if you found her guilty. It would bug you out right? Probably its going to shift your assessment of her guilt in her favor heavily too. Its hard to know that you are basically pushing the button on someone like that.

The evidence was heavily against her but there was still enough leeway for someone who was looking for a way out for her.

@Brainy Smurf women who don't commit crimes do go to jail tho 🥴🥴

@Brainy Smurf women who don't commit crimes do go to jail tho 🥴🥴

@ryuzakikun96 If her death was accidental then why was tape placed across her mouth and why did Casey write in her journal that she did the right thing and how happy she was about it?

@Jonn Jonnn You're not very intelligent. She definitely did it and she did it on purpose.

@jane doe I think it has to do with her age and gender too. They didn't want to put a 22 year old to death and they weren't certain it was premeditated, though I do believe her journal proves it was. There was somebody clever on the jury who focused on proving to the others there was reasonable doubt and none of the others recalled the details enough to refute it. The trial was a shitshow.

We all feel that way. I understand why the jury messed up. It was a shitshow.

We all feel that way. I understand why the jury messed up. It was a shitshow.

@Paula Suarez well, 'drowned in the pool' was what they said, not me.
I think they're narcissistic psychopaths and that would be the reason why you cannot grasp how a sticker would be interpreted as being 'sweet'.
I watch way too much true crime and have been seriously interested in forensic psychology for decades.
I have both experience and insight
that helps me interpret things I used to try so hard to find an answer for.
I'm always interested in the why of things.
I wanted always to find what was wrong with me...why things happened, what did I do?
Instead I discovered there are psychopaths.
There are two psychological components to having placed a sticker and where it was placed: one's conscious and one's subconscious.
Kaylee was old enough to string words together.
She may have been percieved as a potential threat.
A sticker over her mouth would be a subconscious tell.
Casey's jealousy of her daughter's relationship with Cindy Anthony was definitely a factor as well and accounts for her complete lack of interest in the 'disappearance' of kaylee.
Casey may have acted alone to hurt her mother.
It's a pretty effed up family, overall.
Casey's brother seems decent but he's kept himself out of the family circle for the most part.

East Coast Girl I still don’t get it. It was an accident so they decided to pick the drowned toddler’s body, wrap it in garbage bags, put tape on its mouth as a ‘sweet gesture’, and throw it in the woods, not even too far from the house.. not even bury it, so it was scavenged by the animals in the forest to the point that the head and other parts were found separate. I try to understand a twisted universe where this is a sweet gesture but It is just impossible. The doctor who did the autopsy said in court that in her experience all of these are clear signs of murder and and sorry but I have to agree here. The lawyer is charismatic for sure, and the grandfather should face a trial himself given the accusations, but don’t get carried away from common sense.

@ryuzakikun96 that is what makes me think there's a grandpa component to this.

@ryuzakikun96 that is what makes me think there's a grandpa component to this.

@psychic crocodile no I think she got away with everything bc she looks appealing.
Idk who killed kaylee.
I suspect casey, because she was tormented by jealousy over the closeness of kaylee to her grandma.
However, I dont know if anyone else can see the look in Caylee's eyes and the fake smiles but I think she was already mentally fractured.
Which makes me suspect grandpa.
They didnt mention the 'kaylee drowned in the pool' thing here, did they?
A child's emotional development begins in the womb.
The next 12 years are crucial, yet plenty of parents think of their babies as empty headed know-nothings just as they do animals.
That's dumbing down for ya.

@Jos sa It was because the defendant lawyer tried to convince them that Casey Anthony was not guilty, but in fact she was. It was a emotional roller-coaster ride through the jury's minds and ultimately they were persuaded by the defendant lawyer's clever words.

@Katniss The cat Have you even watch Law Abiding Citizen?  Yeaaaa~ about that-

@Katniss The cat Have you even watch Law Abiding Citizen?  Yeaaaa~ about that-

@Brainy Smurf Hm. I wonder what all those female prisons are filled with then?🤔

@Brainy Smurf Hm. I wonder what all those female prisons are filled with then?🤔

@Katniss The cat those jurors need jail time

@Katniss The cat those jurors need jail time

ryuzakikun96 So, youre sayin like involuntary manslaughter?

ryuzakikun96 So, youre sayin like involuntary manslaughter?

@Brainy Smurf sad how many idiots will cry about 'muh inequality' without realizing objective statistics such as females receiving sentences that are essentially a slap on the wrist compared to men for the same crimes. Feelings over the injustice would have swayed the jury beyond doubt if it were a man in the same scenario.

@ayman el kati guys are convicted of rape all the time without any evidence and just because a fefail said so.

@M.B.M. Yes. My point is that I don't and we dont know what actually happened unless more evidence appears. And nobody is convicted or called murderer without evidence.

The jury in this case was pathetic! I don't know how any one of them can look at themselves in the mirror!!

@ryuzakikun96 She didn't kill her daughter but she covered it up and carried on like she was never a mother, how convenient! 😒

ryuzakikun96 what about the tape on the babys face? She put it after the ‘accidental’ death?

Circumstellar right, you sadly loose your kid by accident and then go partying and get a beautiful life tattoo. Perfectly normal.

I don't think she killed her daughter, but I do think she tried to cover up her daughter's death. I think what most likely happened was that her death was accidental, it doesn't change the fact that she's obviously duplicitous and doesn't seem to care in the least about what happened. She was more concerned about her own life and pleasures than she was about reporting her daughter's death.

Brian T. ... i watched that whole trial ... how on Gods green earth that jury did not find her guilty i'll never understand ... it just makes me mad she is free , not a care in the world ..and that baby is dead ... she dosen't care ... there is a special place in He## for people like her ...

@Maria Palladino it was most likely scarcism

@Maria Palladino it was most likely scarcism

Women dont go to jail for committing crimes. You havent figured this out yet?

Women dont go to jail for committing crimes. You havent figured this out yet?

@Jonn Jonnn I bet pathological liars walk all over you in real life

@Jonn Jonnn I bet pathological liars walk all over you in real life

Jonn Jonnn she didn’t do it because she was a party girl? Ummm that makes ZERO sense.

I still believe it has something to do with her looks.

I still believe it has something to do with her looks.


<b>Shame on humanity for producing 12 people dumb enough to find Casey Anthony not guilty.</b> smh

*Shame on humanity for producing 12 people dumb enough to find Casey Anthony not guilty.* smh

@Gregg Wigen Dude, did you just say that "beyond reasonable doubt" and "more likely than not" is the same standard of proof? Because it is not at all.

They weren’t the brightest but it’s extremely hard to prove murder or 1st degree murder like Americans say

They weren’t the brightest but it’s extremely hard to prove murder or 1st degree murder like Americans say

@gutenbird Then why the duct tape over the child's face then? The truth is that with all the lying and interactions with her firsthand, they did think her a horrible person, horrible enough to do this,and her not calling to report her child missing was as glaring as it gets. The defence probably convinced her to tell the truth about what happened and ruled it as an accident and made her horrible character work in her favor. But that didn't explain the duct tape, unless she was trying to make it look like her daughter was abducted by a serial killer and killed in such a horrible fashion that would deflect blame from her, her mother. Maybe that's why she googled all the stuff to know how to stage it. What do you think of this?

If the prosecution was serious,. they would have tested for the fluid in her lungs that killed her, stuff like this should be routine for the autopsy. How was she killed and was she killed somewhere else,and dump here? These are things they should have done routinely to counter anything the defence can come up with. Instead they let a crazy person walk free. If it was negligence then I feel alittle sorry for her, as a woman and a mother.

How did they not find her guilty on child endangerment??? She didn't report her missing for 31 days! Things like this make me believe it would be better if humans go extinct

-00- -00- They tried to accused her for something they couldn’t prove, instead of third degree murder they should’ve accused her of second degree murder which would’ve been much easier to prove seeing her general lack of concern for her daughter’s well-being.

I do not think she is innocent in the slightest, but I think the prosecution made some grave mistakes.

@Con Fidential no, her slimy lawyers got her off with it. If your version is to be believed, what SHOULD the prosecutor's have done ?

@-00- -00- None of what you said is evidence that she killed her daughter. We know she's guilty in hindsight, but the prosecution tried pressing the wrong charge and there was reasonable doubt.

There are plenty of crappy people walking this earth.  The thing is is my definition of a "dumb" or "crappy" person probably isn't exactly the same as yours.

Shame on humanity for producing a justice system that relies on 12 untrained people, who are likely swayed by emotion rather than logic, to determine whether or not they were guilty. It's such an outdated system, and it's still in use today. It's so smart.

most of the jury said there is not enough evidence to support to place guilty on Casey. But what about fingerprints on the car and daughter that would connect to Casey at least.

she is lucky she is not born in Russia. 98-99% conviction rates.

she is lucky she is not born in Russia. 98-99% conviction rates.

@Jordan Angle and you'd think females would be less likely to let off a mom like that. I was in state prison when Mary Jean Armstrong went in. She was beat within an inch of her life for her crimes. In men's prison, its the cp/r@p!sts, in women's, its the abusive moms that get the violence.

@Jordan Angle that's just not true though is it, there was 7 women and 5 men

@Jordan Angle that's just not true though is it, there was 7 women and 5 men

@delsolman24  Well yeah, there are stories about sexual abuse by high-ranking people across the world. That's true. But they aren't satanic rituals where they practice cannibalism and eat miscarried babies. You're confusing fantasy and reality.

Blake Jhonshen thoughts on all the Epstein/Ross and elite clients and friends. Is that mass hysteria? These stories literally go on forever. Not saying some situations are not made up but way more than you think or ever come to light.

Blake Jhonshen what about the physical evidence of child birth? She was 11-12 range. Besides how can so many stories of identical situations keep getting brought up. I think this is not a case of BS.

@jordyy🍒 I was thinking that too. The accidental drowning through negligence would be totally believable except for the duct tape. What possible use was there for that?

@delsolman24 There are plenty of insane trials where terrible people have been let off. But that satanic rite you're mentioning has been debunked. It's all false information. The case was actually brought up in several of my college psychology lectures as a prime example of what happens when psychology goes wrong. Basically, her therapists kept asking her loaded questions and put her into states of semi-hypnosis where they would actually plant false memories (unintentionally of course) of supposed satanic rituals. Her stories were proven false time and time again when parts of her stories would self-contradict, and people she accused would prove their innocence. The reason she passed all tests was because she herself truly believed in the stories - they were real false (oxymoron, I know) memories implanted by her therapists. If you want true stories of sick and twisted people getting off scot free, look no further than this case, or many other cases in the justice system.

Gregg Wigen they didn’t have to prove she bought the duct tape most people have some in the home already.
And if the baby drowned why would there be duct tape around her skull when it was found
If you’re going to hide and lie about an accidental death
Why do you put duct tape around a dead child’s mouth???

All she was worried about what's going to happen to her she never once cried worried about her daughter or anything.

All she was worried about what's going to happen to her she never once cried worried about her daughter or anything.

Sadly, this isn't the only one. Have you seen OJ Simpsons case?

Sadly, this isn't the only one. Have you seen OJ Simpsons case?

@Jazz Feline I think you’re misunderstanding me here. Jury nullification doesn’t mean “there wasn’t a jury”. It means “the jury decided to rule against the evidence”.

Legally, it’s the jury’s responsibility to come to a verdict. But it’s under absolutely no legal requirement whatsoever to actually use any of the evidence or the trial to come to that verdict. It can legally come to whatever decision it likes however way it likes, and it’s decision is valid and final. CGP Grey did a good video on it. A common example of this being used is back in the 1850s, where abolitionist some juries would use it to let runaway slaves go free even when they “should” have been returned. And some extremely racist juries used it to make black people they knew were wrongfully accused of being runaways and were actually free to go into slavery anyways, because they felt all black people should be enslaved.

The OJ Simpson case was obviously him killing both of them. That was obvious to the jury too. But there were members of the jury who wanted to find him innocent as a political statement against the LAPD and racism in America anyway. They were the most passionate about their position  and held out the longest. And eventually the rest of the jury gave in.

@H W “I’m not telling you anything! You’ll get nothing from me!” Solo growled as two stormtroopers secured his wrists above his head with cuffs attached to a hook on the ceiling and his feet with shackles on the floor.

Although he wasn’t quite spread-eagled, the stretch was sufficient to be uncomfortable, and Solo’s arms were supporting most of his body weight.

“Leave us,” Vader said to the two stormtroopers.

They saluted and made a quick exit.

“Give me your worst, Vader! You won’t be able to do—” Solo gurgled and wheezed as Vader pinched his airway partially shut.

He didn’t have to listen to this.

Whatever Vader wouldn’t ‘be able to do’ died unvoiced on Solo’s lips.

He could keep this up for a while – denying Solo enough air to speak but not so much that he lost consciousness or died of suffocation.

Solo continued wheezing and choking, saliva bubbling and dripping from his parted lips as Vader paused to consider his course of action.

The stormtroopers had already punched Solo in the gut a few times when he was first taken prisoner.

Something different would be more effective as an opening salvo.

Hmm.

Old-fashioned bone-bending, perhaps?

Yes, that should do.

Vader would start with bone-bending.

With a flick of his gloved fingers, the long bones in Solo’s arms and legs began to warp themselves into unnatural curves.

Bending, bending, bending, but not quite enough to snap and break.

Vader knew exactly where to stop.

Solo eyes bulged and began to leak tears as he tried to gulp the air to scream.

Vader decided not to allow it.

Not yet.

He tightened his grip on Solo’s windpipe ever, ever so slightly.

The excruciating pain made it easy for Vader to penetrate Solo’s mind.

Time to up the ante further.

Now Vader caused all of Solo’s nerve endings everywhere in his body to fire at once, a sensation of unspeakable, unimaginable but wholly phantom pain – worse by far than the pain of being electrocuted or burnt – on top of the real pain of the bone-bending.

Solo’s gauche clothes were soaking wet with perspiration; his mind was a supernova-bright explosion of agony.

He tried screaming again.

Again, Vader did not let him.

All in all, Vader thought, this was going well.

Solo did not want to scream in defiance or anger.

His scream would be a mindless plea for mercy, for succor, for an end to his suffering.

He wanted to be saved.

This was exactly the kind of intense emotion Vader needed him to project across the vast expanses of the galaxy.

And yet…

And yet.

It wasn’t quite enough.

Solo hated pain, was unmanned by it, that was true, Vader could see that in his mind.

But there was something the smuggler hated even more—

How amusing.

A shame Vader was no longer young.

Once, he would have been able to make Solo’s worst nightmares come true the old-fashioned way, his body pushed into Solo’s, taking his pleasure from the exquisite friction of flesh against flesh as Solo writhed on the impalement, humiliated by his vulnerability and the unmasking of his most shameful, secret desires—

Abruptly, the neuropathic pain stopped, and Solo’s bones straightened.

Solo sagged in his restraints, chest heaving, panting for breath that still wouldn’t quite come.

Vader gave him no more than a split second’s reprieve before, with another flick of Vader’s gloved fingers, Solo’s anus began to stretch.

He didn’t understand what was happening at first.

He was too brutalized, too exhausted, to notice what Vader was doing to him.

That changed, however, when Vader curled his fingers into a fist.

Solo’s back arched, and he threw his head back and writhed, trying to exhale, trying to scream, as his anus was stretched to a circumference equal to Vader’s fist, as the unnatural invasion began to progress deeper.

And deeper still.

He started moving in and out of Solo, punching, pounding in and out of him with all of the dark Force energies he could muster.

Solo’s thoughts were incoherent blurts of pure emotion; if he could have spoken he would have been begging and pleading – though whether for Vader to stop or never to stop neither Vader nor Solo were entirely certain.

The penetration continued, wracking Solo’s already much-abused body with a humiliating, intoxicating blend of pain and pleasure.

Solo’s pants were bulging at the groin; he was aroused and appalled by his arousal and horrified by how close he was to coming—

Solo started to orgasm.

Vader rammed his power home into Solo for a final time, the extent of the stretch monstrous, obscene as the insertion of a hand and the arm it was attached to, to the elbow and beyond, and as Solo ejaculated uncontrollably, torso jerking with each violent pulse, Vader at last released his hold on Solo’s windpipe.

Luke would definitely hear that scream, wherever in the great wide galaxy he was.

Save me, Solo’s mind screamed over and over, helpless, desperate, reduced to base, animal terror, save me.

It seemed practically neverending, and it was everything.

Amenities or no amenities, overall Vader was most pleased with the outcome of the interrogation.

He summoned the two stormtroopers back into the holding cell.

“We are finished here,” he said. “Remove him.”

@Jazz Feline OJ Simpson was a case of jury nullification though.

@Jazz Feline OJ Simpson was a case of jury nullification though.

The issue in the case was that none of the evidence could actually 100% prove murder though, because the defence lawyer came up with a plausible explanation for how it could have been manslaughter or 2nd degree murder, The problem was the charge they gave her. If they hadn’t used 1st degree, it would have gone through. But for 1st degree murder, you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt someone intended and planned  to kill someone ahead of time.

Casey is the type of person to avoid responsibility and just pretend things haven’t happened. One time, she was fired from her job, and in response, she just kept on showing up day after day and working normally, acting like she wasn’t fired until people noticed her that day, and told her to leave. And she just kept on showing up, day after day, until her parents intervened.

So, she has a track record of going out of her way to maintain her borderline delusional image of “normal life”.  Is it really impossible to believe that if Casey was negligent, and her daughter drowned while she was on her phone, that she really would just wrap the body up, out in in the wood, and just pretend nothing had happened and everything was still normal? Or at the least, that she “let” her daughter play by the pool until she accidentally feel in, and then pretended not to notice until she had drowned, and then hid the body?

The issue was that this IS a plausible explanation. And even if you think it’s not what happened, in order to be found guilty of something, it has to be the ONLY plausible explanation for something. So even if it was probably a murder, as long as there’s another explanation that is legitimatly equally viable, you can’t find someone guilty of it.

@Elder_God What does that have to do with Grindr?

@Elder_God What does that have to do with Grindr?

ryuzakikun96 I get your point but tell that to the people that are wrongfully in jail just because they are accused of doing something and no evidence has presented to prove the accusation. I think you know what i’m talking about though..

@barbara grace there were lesser charges for which she was also acquitted

@barbara grace there were lesser charges for which she was also acquitted

@Gissel Gomez yea Law doesn't work like that. were you on this jury?

@Gissel Gomez yea Law doesn't work like that. were you on this jury?

D1agram exactly. That’s the real reason she got away. The Prosecutor did a very bad job proving 1st Degree Murder but so confidently talked as if they knew it was 1st Degree. They left no room for it being an accident. And the reality is no one knows if it was an accident or if the kid drowned in the pool while Casey was drunk. The accident theory seems a bit more believable to me.

It was the DA’s fault not how great the defense was. Sure, she was guilty but of what? Was if premeditated or an accident? How did the crime happen? The prosecution left too many holes that the jury had little choice. If the DA had charged her on a lesser charge, they would have convicted.

@barbara grace Prosecutors sometimes go for an all or nothing approach.  They want the jury to choose between the most serious offense or nothing. They hope the jury will be reluctant to let Defendant walk away with nothing.  More sensible prosecutors will add a lesser charge.  For example, a DUI with bad driving and no breath/blood test:  the more sensible prosecutor will amend to add count 2, reckless driving, which is not a lesser included offense, but will more likely get something out of the case.

that lawyer was pretty good at what he do though, he created doubt and if I'm not wrong, they only need 1 person out of the 12 to say shes not guilty to have the not guilty ruling.

Juries are often carefully selected to determine an outcome

Juries are often carefully selected to determine an outcome

If it can happen for OJ it can happen for anybody

If it can happen for OJ it can happen for anybody

I feel so sick watching and listening to this beast!

I feel so sick watching and listening to this beast!

@Jane Doe X Just reasonable doubt.  Not beyond any doubt.  If it more likely than not that Casey googled it... that satisfied reasonable doubt.  Sadly, folks don't actually know what "Beyond reasonable doubt" means.

@Paislee Fiddyment yes, but it also has to be unanimous in a NOT GUILTY verdict.  otherwise you have a hung jury and an acquittal (which can be re-tried.)

@Ravakeksis Well, you've have to prove SHE bought the duct tape to prove premeditation.

@Ravakeksis Well, you've have to prove SHE bought the duct tape to prove premeditation.

@ryuzakikun96 Most people don't actually understand what "Beyond Reasonable Doubt" means.  They assume it means you have to be SO certain, there can be no reasonable doubt whatsoever that you are wrong.  This is NOT the case.  "Beyond Reasonable Doubt" means, "A normal person, given the information you have been given, would reasonably presume guilt."  The "Beyond Reasonable Doubt" meaning is actually very lenient.  If it is "More likely than not" that the person is guilty, beyond reasonable doubt means you should find guilty.  Unfortunately, folks have gotten that all twisted around in their heads.  They think it means some crazy standard of proof that just isn't necessary.

Shame on the American justice system that uses random people to judge law cases.

Shame on the American justice system that uses random people to judge law cases.

My chief told me that you better stay away from court because the people deciding your fate are 12 people too stupid to play hooky on jury duty

@RavakeksisCan you prove WHO googled it ? Beyond any doubt ?

@RavakeksisCan you prove WHO googled it ? Beyond any doubt ?

@ryuzakikun96 The media blew this case into the stratosphere.  I firmly believe that jury selection was a big factor in the outcome.  The prosecution misread the jury and presented the case in a "traditional" manner.  The defense attorneys knew better and had an idea of exactly what they were looking for during jury selection.  To have no knowledge of this case at the time a person would have had to be living under a rock.  The defense came out swinging hard because they knew exactly the type of jury they were speaking to.  Florida law is also a major factor in the outcome.  It's generally vaguely written, that is why the prosecutors had to pile on so many charges.  I do fully agree that I'd rather see the occasional guilty person get let off than have an innocent person put behind bars.

More than 12, unfortunately... People love to cling to what they WANT to believe over any evidence that disagrees with their hope.

@Ravakeksis While certainly suspicious, it's also circumstantial.

@Ravakeksis While certainly suspicious, it's also circumstantial.

It only takes one person believing she’s not guilty for that to be the verdict. The jury has to be unanimous in a guilty verdict.

I think the prosecution overcharged her, they needed a lesser charge, that would have been a slam dunk.

I think the prosecution overcharged her, they needed a lesser charge, that would have been a slam dunk.

The prosecution's job is to prove that the defendant committed the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. The forensic evidence was sloppy and the prosecution relied way too heavily on character evidence and trying to assert that Ms. Anthony is a "bad" person. And while we all know she is indeed a bad person, that does not change the fact that the prosecution clearly failed to piece togther what exactly happened to Caylee Anthony and prove that Ms. Anthony was responsible for it. This is our justice system, it isn't perfect, but I'd much rather see the occasional guilty person let off scot-free than to see a criminal justice system that does not put the burden of proof on the state.

@Ms. Buschhorn how do you know that they were ganged up on?

@Ms. Buschhorn how do you know that they were ganged up on?

Perhaps some of them were compensated for doing that. 😑

Perhaps some of them were compensated for doing that. 😑

@D1agram Maybe so, but then pursue 2nd degree murder or manslaughter. Inept prosecutors.

@D1agram Maybe so, but then pursue 2nd degree murder or manslaughter. Inept prosecutors.

or at least just <b>ONE</b> that refuses to believe idiocy and sticks to his guns!?

or at least just *ONE* that refuses to believe idiocy and sticks to his guns!?

there are no limits to how slimy and manipulative a defence could be

there are no limits to how slimy and manipulative a defence could be


Who the hell uses full names? I don't know any of my friends middle names LOL.


That’s insane!  so did her dad do that to her was she molested?!!!!  What what it’s like she got the guy from devils advocate what in the what!! His salary must be millions


One of the guiltiest people I’ve ever seen gets set free. Unreal.

Broccoli_Jaeger it’s not a race thing but she should be in jail

She’s guilty but her parents are so sweet

I guarantee a large part is because they pulled the sexual abuse by the father card.

@Pink Oreo _ <br>What a disgusting thing to say 🤣 lol

@Pink Oreo _
What a disgusting thing to say 🤣 lol

@Broccoli_Jaeger you can't say someone is guilty when "there is no proof".

@esther fisher they did find the body though, close to their home.. with evidence from the home..

Thats how the US courts system is like.  Fraudulent nothing new

@Helen Healy OJ was rich. That’s the difference

It’s not what you know. It’s who you know. Unfortunately.

A true and tragic failure of the justice system when she was set free. To think she doesn't live more than 30 minutes away from me.

@Your Wrong 😂😂😂😂 I’m quite well established & content. Don’t make a fool of yourself.

@Bam Bam oh you mean like OJ! Hahaha, gtfo with your victim hood mentality. Try being a better person and put your victim card back in your pocket. Trade in your tissues for work shoes, get out there and do something with your life. That’s the issue. Oh! And inner city violence… yeah let’s put a stop to that.

@esther fisher she's not pretty as in she's some beauty queen but she's girl next door pretty enough. She looks perfectly average girl next door. Not too thin or too thick for that, not too pretty or too ugly for that. Not too old or too young for that. Not too in your face or too much of a wallflower.

I think regardless of whether you personally think she's pretty that had a part in it.

She's also a brunette and brunettes are usually subconsciously judged to be more trustworthy, responsible, reliable and mature than blondes, redheads and women with black hair.

@Samantha Fujiwara Out of everyone, the only person all of y’all could come up with was, OJ Simpson 😂😂 and that says a lot! Unless you’re a person of color, you’ll never understand the difference.

@Pink Oreo _ What about OJ? And have you ever seen White Boy? It's a true story by the way. Quit with the race card cry baby.

@Helen Healy Yep, OJ was obviously guilty and he got off.

@NoSoul NoProblem pretty privilege is a thing but i don't think it played a part here. it seems like most murder cases women get off more easier than guys. why that is, I'll never know, but that's just what I've seen so far

@Pink Oreo _ <b>OJ SIMPSON HAS ENTERED THE CHAT</b>

@Pink Oreo _ *OJ SIMPSON HAS ENTERED THE CHAT*

Well, we all know why she didn't get convicted.

@Pink Oreo _ don't you feel like it was more a general pretty privilege thing in her case that helped her? I mean in my opinion she has evil eyes but she's still close to the beauty standards of the time and I feel like any woman, regardless of her skin color, whose looks are further away from the beauty standards would've had a way harder time getting away with what she did. I just feel like if she was overweight, had crooked teeth, a less tidy looking haircut etc. she wouldn't have gotten away with this as easily - regardless of skin color.

@Lordoa We all know its easier to convict a person with color.

@Pink Oreo _ Gee don't make it about race. You make it sound like no innocents of the "correct skin color" go to jail.

@Broccoli_Jaeger Yes , you can. Tell that to the many people who are innocent, serving time & aren’t the correct skin color.

@Broccoli_Jaeger no proof???? She searched on the internet how to suffocate someone, wrote in her diary that she was now happy since her daughter was dead, and every single part of her story was a lie

She definitely was guilty, but you can't put someone in jail when there is no proof


She got away with it again (lie workt again for her)!!!


She murdered her own child. No remorse. Lies and coldness. She’s deranged

@SE Mowery you can tell by her moma reaction that she was there to confirm her suspicions, you se it the exact moment sh missuses past particle her mom just dies inside

@SE Mowery It doesn't matter who rules the Empire then the Empire is in terminal faze. At this point, inertia alone will bring about collapse and implosion of the whole Empire. We not taking into account how the other 3 Empires will act then we finally implode (China, EU, Russia). At this point the fate if US is sealed. Divided house can not stand. The nation is divided, broken, demoralized, and absolutely in conflict with it self. Brother against brother, mother against daughter, father against the son; neighbor against neighbor. This is beyond salvageable. I suggest, you prepare for imminent collapse of the Empire, insuring chaos, loss of services, collapse of law, and starvation. The fact what most of our crops are destroyed, and pandemic stifling food production, will only make the process so much worse and lethal. Good luck to all of us, we will need it.

It's kind of fascinating though, how she never broke therefore never confessed. 😐

@Matthew Ummm.. sorry to disappoint you but he doesn't have it anymore so..Trump 2020 it is!

Notice in call with parents from jail She keeps using past tense like "you were great grandparents to her" " she was very lucky to have you"..she only corrected herself once.

@VitriolVic it is. Hope a safe and lovely year for 2021. God knows we need a better 2021 yr

@Melissa Vickery Sick sad world we live in. :( Take care.

@VitriolVic i think that will happen  too. That's what I explained to my husband

@VitriolVic I'm sure she hasn't admitted the truth to anyone

@Melissa Vickery I'm certain she never admitted guilt to anyone except for whoever was with her at the time/accomplice. Yes, of course, she's guilty but there was no actual proof of anything. Her DNA was nowhere to be found. We know she's guilty, we simply can't prove it, sadly.  <br>I'm wondering if they charged her with a lesser incriminating charge, ie. involuntary manslaughter, if they coulda got her then. She's obviously responsible for whatever happened to her daughter, she was in her care when she died. Sad story all around & I followed the entire proceedings on Court Tv. She got off cuz she banged her lawyer, who put on a career-making defense. He became the #1 defence attorney upon his win.

@Melissa Vickery I'm certain she never admitted guilt to anyone except for whoever was with her at the time/accomplice. Yes, of course, she's guilty but there was no actual proof of anything. Her DNA was nowhere to be found. We know she's guilty, we simply can't prove it, sadly.
I'm wondering if they charged her with a lesser incriminating charge, ie. involuntary manslaughter, if they coulda got her then. She's obviously responsible for whatever happened to her daughter, she was in her care when she died. Sad story all around & I followed the entire proceedings on Court Tv. She got off cuz she banged her lawyer, who put on a career-making defense. He became the #1 defence attorney upon his win.

@VitriolVic yea she actually does. That's why it's irritating that she has gotten away with it. Michelle Parker was another Orlando girl that went missing and no one could seem to find out what happened. Orlando cops can't do their job

@Melissa Vickery Stop lying. Ur sister doesn't know anyone.

@Krispy Kreme I think you mean "RIP Trump 2020" cuz he gots the covid.

This is what happens when random people get to make legal decisions because we're too lazy to go off of only evidence.
And when you use conspiracies and blame the media for everything including sullying her 'good' reputation.
You can get away with murder, and even become president.


Imagine being her dad.. being accused of sexual abuse while everybody knows she killed his granddaughter.

Lon Spector OK now you’re veering off, so I’m just going to exit this exchange. Peace.

Lon Spector I do happen to love that song, Sara. That was a huge hit song the week my daughter was born in ‘86.

Lon Spector you did NOT just seriously say that. There is no redemption for child killers. None. Quite frankly anyone who has empathy for them is someone to be highly suspicious of.

DukeNukem nope. Not possible. In America you cannot be charged with a crime that you have already been acquitted of. It’s called double jeopardy.  Sad but true.

DukeNukem um not the way US law works. Sadly.

But “believe all women”. This case is the poster child case for .... NOT🙄

Elizabeth Cummins i wouldn't want anything to do with her if that was my daughter.

@Elizabeth he did? Then its propably futile

DukeNukem  I don’t understand how the lawyer married her though...

@Lon Spector you and the others here are truly astounding

@Elizabeth maybe some Day in The future she stands trial again for her crime

D C  By the time she had the child, they already knew how irresponsible and a liar she was. They smelled a dead body in her car and couldn’t find the child and couldn’t press her because denial. The mom was partying and not telling anyone about the child ‘disappearing’ 31 days earlier. The parents condoned/enabled...and I’m sure a psychiatrist could go back and examine how this woman turned out this way, like they’ve done with OJ.

@DukeNukem Unfortunately, they didn't put her on the witness stand so she could say it herself. So, after the trial is almost complete they bring it up only during the closing statements. If she would have said in court she would have been cross examined and then it would be over for her. She'll get hers in time.

part 3 ... where did you get all of this info?

Well, we can't say for certain he never sexually abused her.     Let's just say Casey Anthony did not win her personality at the local fair.<br>'watch out, there is an apple falling from the tree'

Well, we can't say for certain he never sexually abused her.     Let's just say Casey Anthony did not win her personality at the local fair.
'watch out, there is an apple falling from the tree'

@Elizabeth Cummins  yes but then came the car crash and he reached out to her....

@JustTrollinAlong she probaply lied about that statement

Funny thing is...the only reason to mention that specific thing in this court case was to gain sympathy.

It had no relation to the murder. It had no relevance to the case. Except to generate sympathy.

You try to get sympathy from the jury because you're trying to sway them or cushion the courts judgement of you.

Because she did it.

If people accuse you of something you didn't do, you fight - argue - you ask "what the fuck is wrong with you"....you don't go about trying to place blame elsewhere like "you can't really blame me because..."

More importantly - just because daddy touched your NO NO doesnt mean its cool to kill your kid. So how THIS was again EVEN FUCKING RELEVANT is beyond me.

@Deep Inside yes in court she said her father molested her

Doodle Vision psychopaths are born, sociopaths and narcissists are made. Not her parents fault

@Lon Spector it doesn't happen all the time... boost.


she killed her kid for sure, she wrote it on her journal theres no doubt about that, and sure she threw her dad under the bus sure that just another lie, but im saying that she needs help, prisons gonna do no good


Holy shit, I was born on August 9th of 2005...That could've been me.

No, it couldn't. Why do people have to make everything about themselves.


“I was an event coordinator” ....”Casey stood at a booth and sold pictures to people after getting off the Incredible Hulk ride” lol

I was listening to this at 2am and cracked up so hard I woke up my roommate when I heard this lol

When I told you I busted out laughing lol

The delivery is on point. The writer's knew how to properly use the narrator's interesting voice.

The Hulk ride was legendary  she just killed the buzz I once felt ! Darn it.. Whyyy was it the Hulk and not Superman or spider man!!😔🙄🙈

@Lily RE your comment made me laugh way too much because it's so spot on lmao

This felt like Ron Howard on Arrested Development.

This channel has a brilliant way of mimicking classing crime documentary voice and tone while slipping in those total burns xD

I'm an Senior IT Manager. I say people 10 times a day they should f*ing document their code and shouldn't close their user stories without testing. The same thing.


sounds like my ex-gf with the crazy but somehow believable lies


“She was not an event coordinator, she stood at a kiosk and sold photos of people after being on the Incredible Hulk ride” I’m dead

I died at how serious he was when saying that, I loved the Incredible Hulk ride, although the line was ridiculous.

12:31 Holy shit, at this point at the video I was like "If you´re gonna tell me now 'Zenaida doesn´t exist', I´m gonna freak the fuck out" ! Oddly enough, that I called it, but holy shit, I just had to say something here, this is so far beyond insanity, I can´t even comprehend anymore. I need some dialogue, I need some people to explain this to me or otherwise make sense....

@Aaron King this isnt a thing that just chicks do, the amount of dudes that lie about their job to get laid is far greater

Chicks always try to make their jobs out to be something important

I had the same reaction.  That was an amazing lowkey diss.  👏

Lmfao. Out of everything of the video. 😂

Maybe not the best description of yourself for this particular video.

@Arkantos This chick was not smart or smooth and got away with murder. You gonna be fine.

I’m dead after this comment! 😂😂😂😂👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻😂😂😂😂😂😂👏🏻👏🏻😂😂😂😂


She could have worked her way to the TOP in the Republican Party.


The jury failed this little girl just like her mother did.

@sokami You idolize Stalin and the Soviets. You don't even hide it. Your goal is to dismantle the Constitution and turn the country into a shithole. Which is why you're arguing so hard to give the state the ability to ruin people's lives by constantly charging them with the same crime over and over.

@Chris Reed What if new evidence pops up showing undeniable guilt for a crime? Not so much in this case, but I'm sure it has happened since technology has improved...

@Mr305Maxxx I have never heard anything about her biological father either. He was never mentioned. I know they fabricated the story about sexual abuse. Everything that came out of her mouth was a lie. It really pisses me off she's walking around free. 😡

@Mr305Maxxx Didn't she accuse him of sexually abusing her? Or am I wrong?

@kill dANo LMFAO;) good one Bro     #StupidVSsmart

@kill dANo LMFAO;) good one Bro     #StupidVSsmart

@puenteUSA.com Actually, 4 of the 7 charges against her were for lying to the police and obstruction of justice, and on those 4 counts she was found guilty and sentenced to 1043 days in jail and a $4000 fine which she did when she was waiting to be trialed.

Wow , people there you have it ! If you ever commit murder take down this lawyers name ! ..smh .. I don't know how that lawyer sleeps at night

@Chris Reed your kind of missing the point. You said it yourself "There have been instances where a murder case has gotten acquitted and the person later said they did it" that's my entire argument. your talking about how the justice system works in general not about this particular case. Look at her behaviour, her body language and all the lies shes told. These are not the actions of an innocent woman. Because of the double jeopardy clause Caylee Anthony's story will never have the closure that she deserves. Its all well and good talking about the founding fathers but in this particular case that clause will prove to be a lifeline for Casey Anthony not for Caylee.

@Chris Reed I agree and understand what your saying but what if one day she says "yes I did it" or some new evidence comes to light. That's it, nothing can be done. Its 'win win' for her and the justice system has failed this little girl not once but twice. If I did kill a little girl which i never would I'd expect to be hounded, shunned and accused for the rest of my natural life. Not just for one courtroom appearance.

The courts never said she was innocent. They said they didn't have enough evidence to convict her. The jurors themselves knew it was the wrong verdict but "beyond  reasonable doubt" is the way it works in law. We all know she's guilty but sadly the evidence just wasn't enough. Sadly double jeopardy means she will never face a re-trial. we shall just hope and pray that karma will work its magic on her, if not now then one day when she least expects it.

@G R Cleve Never understood this. All evidence should be presented. If the other side opposes it, they can explain why they oppose it during the trial.

The Prosecution failed! No DNA evidence, nothing to tie Casey to Murder.

don't think she ever had a mother just a grandmonther

Well, it doesn't matter anymore. She is free.

Well, it doesn't matter anymore. She is free.

Roo Mum so then the prosecution or judge failed to properly explain it to them. Not the jury’s fault that they weren’t educated in that aspect. The prosecution/judge sucked and that coupled with Baez’s closing argument is why she walked.

@N. D. M. Talk about attacking my character with absolutely nothing to base it on. Your whole comment is a ridiculous non-argument. Just because i disagree with a part o the fifth amendment, and not even to the point of completely nullifying that part of it, and point to issues such as the ethics of maintaining such a rule when faced with new evidence, the potential for corruption, and how it can be used to legitimize vigilantism.... your argument is that "i don't understand the constitution or US history". You don't need to inform me of why it was put into the constitution. I would argue that upholding specific rules regardless of changing circumstance and refusing to consider revising it at any point, is dogmatic. You are being blindly dogmatic and using it to attack my character. Either you can address my arguments as I actually typed them out, or you can just go away because you're pointless to engage with if you can't argue in good faith.

@N. D. M. Talk about attacking my character with absolutely nothing to base it on. Your whole comment is a ridiculous non-argument. Just because i disagree with a _part_ o the fifth amendment, and not even to the point of completely nullifying that _part_ of it, and point to issues such as the ethics of maintaining such a rule when faced with new evidence, the potential for corruption, and how it can be used to legitimize vigilantism.... your argument is that "i don't understand the constitution or US history". You don't need to inform me of why it was put into the constitution. I would argue that upholding specific rules regardless of changing circumstance and refusing to consider revising it at any point, is dogmatic. You are being blindly dogmatic and using it to attack my character. Either you can address my arguments as I actually typed them out, or you can just go away because you're pointless to engage with if you can't argue in good faith.

@sokami spoken by someone who has no understanding of American history and why it was put into the US Constitution. This keeps people safe from the government continually charging someone over and over until they get the results it wants. There is still the civil courts that are more lenient with prosecution, but money penalty based, for those who are directly involved and think there is a case.

Prosecutor failed. I believe she is guilty but if picked into jury and only relyed on information given during trial I would have given not guilty verdict. Some of the defense arguments didn't make sense but prosecutor didn't question them. Jury has no ability to make own arguments.

N. D. M. Absolutely not accurate attorney, try again.

N. D. M. Absolutely not accurate attorney, try again.

Cody it was lost in the instructions of the judge. They were basically forced to convict her of being a cold hearted murderer (which i 100% believe) or nothing. Many jurors stated they believe something happened and she died but they didnt believe she purposefully killed her. In my opinion anything a parent would do to a child to cause something so terrible than hide it for a month, relentless partying , lying and being a twat, deserves to never breathe a slit of free air ever again. Things happen, terrible things happen everyday. The way we human up makes all the difference. She ... i just cant forgive.

@N. D. M. "illegal to have another trial for the same crime once a verdict is given. Even if more evidence is found."

True, and it's  a completely bullshit rule. This should not by applied to extremely violent crimes or other actions that irreparably destroy another persons life.

Having a person walk free who is responsible for someones death, simply because the initial charge was too high, is another major piece of bullshit. Having a literal legal route for allowing a person who is provably guilty of a lesser but still very serious charge, simply because the initial charge was "too high", is a backwards system.

This rule isn't just fundamentally problematic, it also allows for corruption which involves guilty parties bribing, blackmailing or convincing the prosecution to overcharge to the point that the specific charge is unprovable. Such corruption would also be difficult to detect, because it would appear the prosecution is grilling the defendant every step of the way in order to prove their case.

Finally it gives the perfect excuse to vigilantism, especially when undeniable evidence comes forth proving the guilt of someone for a serious offense. It's very difficult to blame someone for "taking the law into their own hands", when the law has quite literally exhausted itself by its own ridiculous short-sighted regulations.

I mean she wasn't guilty. not at all. Didn't give a crap

Personally it’s sad but we weren’t in the court room it’s not fair to say the jury failed her the production did a terrible job and your only flaw with her is her emotion on her child. I agree she 100% did something here even if it was giving her child away and was happy she didn’t have to have her child. Can you say that she 100% killed her daughter or could she have watched someone else kill her child. No one knows anything all we know is she wanted her daughter gone/dead.

@kill dANo I agree, have always said that. Why is it being left to people who don't even understand the evidence that is presented?

@rw501 It was the jury. They admitted they didn't understand circumstantial evidence. If they had, they wouldn't have acquitted her!

@Cody Sadly cannot happen. Rule of double jeopardy.

@Cody Sadly cannot happen. Rule of double jeopardy.

I watched the entire the trial. They excluded the jurors from quite a bit of the crucial evidence presented by the prosecution. How can a jury come to any proper conclusion when they are not privy to "all" of the information and arguments  being presented by both sides? It is like completing a jigsaw puzzle which has pieces missing, incomplete. Or expecting a recipe to turn out successfully without key ingredients. The whole thing stunk.

SI0AX sure, but they didn’t kill caylee. stop trying to deflect.

But the lawyer is smiling, and that's what really counts.

WELL, what do you expect? IT'S FLORIDA!!

WELL, what do you expect? IT'S FLORIDA!!

@Sioax Aerikenlooks like the need to try her for Perjury and lying... That's a new trial.   And each and every single other crime she committed the moment she obstructed  justice

No, it wasn’t the jury. It was the prosecution’s strategy and Jose Baez’s closing argument.

@spikefivefivefive since I am not a native speaker it sounds same to me. 😂😂😂

@cookie_dough_hangover  -  She wasn't found "innocent".<br>She was found "not guilty".

@cookie_dough_hangover  -  She wasn't found "innocent".
She was found "not guilty".

@Cody illegal to have another trial for the same crime once a verdict is given. Even if more evidence is found.

Yeah, there needs to be a retrial and a reliable jury that will give her a guilty verdict.

@David S Cameron Not guilty. She walked free.

@David S Cameron Not guilty. She walked free.


@57:57 my jaw hit the mf floor wha da hell.......they threw that ball outta nowhere


It’s unbelievable that she was acquitted of all charges.

@kukalakana Exactly. In my past experience of being on a jury (in Australia), we were instructed by the judge,  and backed up by the  defence (who was no less than a QC), that we were to assess whether the prosecution had successfully shown and proved intent for the charge, which made our job a lot easier even though we had one lady who was taking a more moralistic Christian view during our deliberations. In our case, the defendant received a not guilty (even from the Christian lady) since the prosecution didn't quite prove that intent. The charge we were dealing with was a grievous bodily harm.

@Mark Crisp you never know.  I had an acquaintance who was former MP in the marines he found himself in legal trouble for shooting an armed robber in the back and killing him.  You really never know if you're gonna find yourself in legal trouble.  Stuff happens.

@marikie marie That day was the day I knew "Women are more privileged in America"

@Father Chrissy i think you could argue oj simpson had black privilege. Because he had the whole black community and other sjws putting pressure on the case aaying he was beong charged because he was black

@Father Chrissy actually oj had some race involved in why he was aquited to. The whole black community was behind him and saying they were trying to charge him because he was black. That put pressure on the case

@marikie marie I am not saying she is innocent, she sounds very disturbed, a pathological liar, probably a Narcissist,  but even if there is any element of doubt, i.e. not enough proof then correctly she should not go to Jail. Think if it was you that did not kill someone. Going to Jail won't bring the child back. Better thousands of guilty released, than Just one Innocent person be imprisoned. She might have killed her daughter, or maybe it misadventure,, or something else might have happened. but we will never know for sure. Prosecution should have done more homework.

@HanSDevX I agree, but I would also say also that anyone raised in this irresponsible manner (no punishment for misdeeds, no enforcement of morals, given everything in their life without earning it) is at  risk for a deeply flawed character.

To be fair, men can be princesses too. :)

@Jesse H I knew it was coming sooner or later.

@marikie marie that's the day you knew lol?

@Brad Steiner Exactly. A lot of people refuse to understand. Justice is blind. The legal system worked here the way it was intended to. Yes, this woman is a monster. Legally, the prosecution couldn't touch her.

@kukalakana Not only did the prosecution not do their job, they couldn't do their job because the police apparently didn't get enough in terms of proof and hard evidence to pin it on her irrefutably. I would surmise the police had a lot of circumstantial evidence, which isn't enough for a conviction.

I remember that day so well. I think I was 14 and I’m 24 now. My jaw dropped on the floor when they found her not guilty. Nacy drew Hates Casey so much. She was grilling her every night

Brad Steiner The US justice system worked the way it was supposed to, not justice. This woman was declared not guilty over the murder of her daughter, which she was very obviously guilty of. That’s not justice, and don’t act like it’s right.

This is the issue with juries. People are stupid.

@marikie marie  I respectfully disagree. America is the greatest place on earth. To condemn an entire that  country that people from countries all over the world are desperate to become citizens of based on the poor job of some lawyers isn't rational. .Yes, that woman is a psychopath, but her lawyer did a much better job.  . .

@Jesse H All I'm saying is that the justice system is very broken and if you have the money, the white privilege, the right "look", a good reputation, etc., you can get away with anything. They don't actually care about real guilt or innocence. Why do think innocent people get put on death row? Innocent people get convicted when they don't fit a cookie cutter box that the jury wants.

@Jesse H Yes and the reason that was possible for him as a black male in the 90s is because he was rich, had a fuck ton of resources, and had a great reputation as a football star.

What a stupid jury for real, even if you were scared of your parents you'd call someone.

@Jesse H I mean OJ was acquitted due to his resources, reputation, SES class, and wealth. Anthony was acquitted for being a conventionally attractive young white woman. The jury is a joke, they never actually judge non-biasedly, they make their mind up at the beginning of trial (because using regular civilians off of the streets isn't the best idea they should use psychologists to mass evaluate the trial). As long as they don't say that they have a bias they can stay on the jury.

Nashville Dude what did you do that you’d need that kind of lawyer?

@Father Chrissy OJ simpson was on trial for killing his ex wife and ron goldman and they acquitted him.

@HanSDevX Conventionally attractive white* women get away with anything. I guarantee if this was a black father on trial for the same thing he'd be in prison regardless of there not being enough evidence to tie him to it. Definitely gender inequality, class inequality, and racial inequality that goes on in the system.

@fullmetaljaco and shame on her parents for not telling the truth in court...

Dont forget she was acquitted by 12 people, each of whom went through a lengthy selection process, so what do you know, that nobody else knows ? Please tell us.

Yeah, you got to think tho, if her defense attorney can get someone like that acquitted, he is probably an attorney you want to have if you’re actually innocent

It's not unbelievable when people with brains and logic knew she was innocent.

Well....they acquitted OJ, is it that unbelievable? 🙄🙄

Right, yet so many innocent people still get convicted.

@GuyFromSouth would you have to use him?

@GuyFromSouth would you have to use him?

@Brad Steiner Not at all. The proof is beyond "reasonable doubt..." NOT has to be 100% sure.
I have seen plenty of people found guilty on much less evidence.
Seems to be pure luck...Who are the prosecutors, the defence, the jury and of course the accused.
Some jurers simply look at the accused and make up their minds. Young girl, nice smile guarantee some will say "not guilty.." before a word has been spoken.
If you ever have to rely on jury for your life...You better pray for a miracle.

Its not about what you did its about what they can prove.  Its crazy that it wasnt a guilty verdict.  That lawyer's rate is gonna go through the roof now.  He did a great job.  Id use him, if I could afford him still

That day was the day I knew "America is not great".


If I found out someone's 2-yr old child had been missing/kidnapped for -5- days and she's just now reporting it, I would immediately think she's the worst mother in the world and that she possibly did something. 31 days is just UNREAL

I wuddnt wait 30 MINUTES if one of my kids had disappeared at a young age! The sheer panic I wud feel wud COMPEL me to call the feds before I cud even THINK of lookn for my missing child! Any parent worth their proverbial "salt" wud do/feel exacly the same!

@Gemma G. Yeah, definitely something wrong there. To play devil's advocate though, their daughter seems to be a party girl, so maybe it's normal behavior for her to go "off the grid" so to speak.

Exactly, but why didn't her parents report it earlier? Maccanns got away with it too, all about money

@Alex A Agree and then think of Madeleine McCann's mother.. went running with her husband and playing tennis immediately after their daughter disappeared.  No tears in front of camera crew.   Very, very strange behaviour.

@Kevin Saviro Exactly. The idea that a mother is going to go partying for a month while her child is missing is so completely alien to what a non-psychopathic mother would do it's almost laughable.

@Alex A lol i once went straight from school to a friends house and had a sleepover without telling my mom when i was like 6-7 years old. And when I came home she said the cops were looking for me. I got the whooping of my life.

Forget 5 days... any normal mother would be apoplectic if their child had been missing for even a few hours. I've seen it in totally innocent situations, like a babysitter taking the kid to the park and not having their cell phone on them.  After 24 hours a normal mother is basically unintelligible from the tears and sobbing.

@dave cerrito yeah and she also said in the call that she “didn’t have anything to say to them” it’s so sad

Casey didnt ever report it, her mother made the 911 call


she literally gets away with everything, she bullishits her way out of any consequences successfully

@mato mrak He said women “get away with abortions” which is very clearly placing the blame on the women. By comparing women who get abortions to Casey and placing the blame on those women, he is essentially calling these women manipulators. Yes in both cases the child dies but in many cases children die and yet we recognize it is wrong to compare trauma. For example, if I posted about how 215 Indigenous children’s bodies were found on a residential school site in Canada (which did really happen), and someone said “free Palestine” or “my child died too” or something like that, we can very clearly see that it is wrong. You’re taking a huge issue and equating it with another very huge but separate issue, therefore taking attention away from the issue currently in discussion. Also abortion, though horrible and immoral, is unfortunately heavily politicized, and bringing up politics in a murder case is bound to come off as insensitive, even if he didn’t mean it that way. Sure, some abortions are had because the woman wants freedom from parenthood or freedom to be irresponsible, but in almost all circumstances of abortion it is much more than just a matter of inconvenience. Poverty, desire to get an education, the pain and potentially permanent injuries that can result from pregnancy and birth, the manipulative tactics of abortion providers, the misleading political climate, the fear of being a bad parent, the fear of being disowned or broken up with are ALL huge issues when it comes to abortion and there are way more. I too went through an “anti feminist” phase (I’m a woman btw) where I believed abortion was purely a selfish and irresponsible decision, but having realized that is false, it’s opened my eyes up to the real world. Overall, the context of these two situations may seem comparable, but it’s also very different in certain ways. Abortion is unfortunately politicized, infanticide is not. Abortion is normalized, infanticide is not. Abortion happens mainly because of circumstance and a lack of education, infanticide in this case was purely out of selfish evilness. Abortion normally happens before the child can feel or mentally process pain. Her child undoubtedly suffered. None of this means abortion is less of an issue- only that the two should not be compared. Please, advocate for the unborn without doing it under the comment sections for a murdered infant and her found-not-guilty mother.

@I'm a comedian Oh jeez lol, I'm not saying she is good looking from a personal stand point, but without knowing the shit she's done, she has the features to be conventionally attractive enough to get away with or receive better treatment than others would. Examples: sexual favors to pay for her attorney, a slew of boyfriends even after being released from jail, admirers sending money while she was in jail, she lied about everything yet was still deemed not guilty (ppl generally attribute more positive qualities to ppl they find attractive), there's a damn article (removed after some time) stating she was working out now and had pictures of her new "toned" look

@ZeSourLemon tell tale sign of a sociopath

@ZeSourLemon tell tale sign of a sociopath

@Some Dude bruh, you think she's good looking? 😂

@Some Dude bruh, you think she's good looking? 😂

@nika kaspia not a clumps of cells but I agree that it's not as bad but by that logic you are also just a clump of cells

@nika kaspia Either way, no reason to have an abortion. Most of the time, it’s people dealing with the consequences of intercourse and looking for an easy way out. Honestly, just make better decisions! I know your rebuttal will be rape. I understand, no one should go through that. You can’t however just use rape, as most people abort to avoid the mistake they’ve made, an easy way out. Either way in general, make better decisions!

I forgot she got away with it all...  Absolutely disgusting

I forgot she got away with it all...  Absolutely disgusting

That people think THAT is ‘good looking’ is half the problem

That people think THAT is ‘good looking’ is half the problem

@Elizabeth Grey maybe its a little upfront. but its the truth. what casey did is just a slight variation of @bortion. k1ll1ng a baby because thier existense poses an inconvenience to your life or lifestyle. (in most casses). the differences here are that what casey did was after the baby was born. Also a lot of mothers feel remorse after the fact, but casey is crazy

@Nick West no no no no, you only get to try her once. last I heard she was still living in Florida her and her parents do not speak anymore but other than that she got away with it. So so sad that anyone could do that to their own child or any child and get off. The last time I seen anything about Casey Anthony her daughter would have been 13 and she was showing pictures of the ultrasounds of the baby when she was pregnant. Which I thought was odd. But yeah she got by with it

@Nick West she got in a bar fight less than a week ago.

@Nick West she got in a bar fight less than a week ago.

@nika kaspia a clump of cells, when is a tadpole a frog. Put away gender studies and pay more attention to science class. It's like saying to someone if I kill you in your sleep it's not murder. If you kill a pregnant woman you're charged with two murders. Why is that considered murder under the law? Can't have it both ways.

How is that?? Isn’t she like dead or in prison?

How is that?? Isn’t she like dead or in prison?

@Some Dude he was not good-looking at all, she was a Barfly s***. But the one thing he had was a great great defense attorney. Like it or not and I don't but the lawyer was a very Gifted Man. He knew from day one exactly what he was going to do and when he was going to do it it was all calculated. Every time someone testified against her just made it a lot easier for him to do what he needed to do. She did not get away with murder someday she will pay but Perry Mason give her a little bit more of freedom until that day comes.

@Some Dude she is not and was never good looking...

@Some Dude she is not and was never good looking...

@Tube Guy idk man would you rather have a child grow up in a bad situation and possibly take their own life or make sure they never have to go through that

@Tube Guy murder of a 3 year old and abortion are far cries from eachother... i understand your feelings on abortion but this is really not the time to bring that up.

@Tube Guy abortion is a medical procedure to dispose a clump of cells, this was a murder of a 3-year-old child. don't even try to compare them.

@Andrew it's so strange, they literally proved she lied about everything but got away with it... the jury knew she was guilty. They see her cry and everything changes, when a man cries he is weak but when a women cries she is strong. It's a bushit double standard.

@Danish so a baby in a womb is a ‘lump of cells’ is what you’re saying. So your basically saying a baby has the same biology as a single cell organism 😂. You can’t be making this up, and it must be a lucky day to talk to the 1 of 12 people with 10 IQ

@Danish What do you mean a lump of cells. How can you compare a fetus and lump of cells. No doctor would ever call fetus even close to tumor. Like dude what are you talking about.

@thrift shop ghost I dont know what manipulation are you talking about like maybe he just meant get away with it as get away with it there is no undertone or secret meaning. And nobody is also talking about not being able to go on with your life. We just see abortions something that is not good. And since we are talking about murder why not talk about a similar kind of murder on similar victim.

Yeah but you got to admit that is one hell of a lawyer

Yeah but you got to admit that is one hell of a lawyer

@Danish abortion is basically killing a wounded person in a hospital. They are both helpless.

@Danish abortion is basically killing a wounded person in a hospital. They are both helpless.

@SoularSystemGG Wym Agenda? I just don’t get abortions man. Just don’t have intercourse.  The majority of abortions are caused from the consequences of intercourse. I know what the rebuttal is going to be, rape. But that word has been stretched so much that rape could be anything. I am aware people experience it, and it’s horrible. No one should experience that. Helpless human beings however, should not be violated as well. Have a good day!

@mello oh of course. I would say like "traditionally" attractive maybe. it's all subjective, but i think there's like a baseline of what is and isn't attractive to most people. I say this as a subjectively ugly woman: she would have gotten less sympathy from the jurors if she was ugly or older.

@Elizabeth Grey Okay he did not say that all women are manipulators you made that up. And it is not so unrelated in both cases the child dies that is why he probbably said it.  He did detract the meaning from event not because he does not feel empathy for the child ( at least i hope so) but because he has empathy for all murdered children. If we can afford to care this much about one murder why cant we care just a little bit more about the murders of arbortion. That is why he said it at least i think. It is not urelated. And what do you mean by sexist undertones he just wrote a two senteces and you found all that stuff in his undertone.

@Lil Snitch & DaHomie I get stoned in public

@Lil Snitch & DaHomie I get stoned in public

@Where's Waldo??? ? sure, abortion is murder. But what’s the point of comparing the murder of a fetus to the murder of a 3 year old?

@Danish Why does it matter if it is outise of womb or inside if there was a way to showe back in a month old baby back inside mother would it be okay to kill it.

@thrift shop ghost you know that someone can’t be objectively attractive right? You might not think she’s ugly but someone else working in the department might.

@Tube Guy Abortion of fetus (inside the womb) ≠ killing of a baby (outside the womb). Now go back to watching Fox News.

@mato mrak This person is comparing trauma, saying that women who have abortions are all just evil manipulators and not people in difficult situations being taken advantage of, and by bringing up abortion in a completely unrelated case, it detracts the meaning from the event and comes off as more as a political power move than showing genuine empathy for the child who died. Not to mention the sexist undertones of again, assuming that the millions of women who get abortions are just selfish, cold hearted people. I don’t think abortion is right either but it exists because of an exploitative system and poverty, not because of the whole ‘females just wanna fxck around’ stereotype.

@Elizabeth Grey Every reply is unnecessary, if it is insensitive idk how but why would you even be offended by that and explain how it is disrespectfull.

@Tube Guy agreed, it is really hard to find some value in this when the same crime is commited every day.

@Tube Guy Dude I’m pro life too but this is SO unnecessary, insensitive and disrespectful. Shut up

@NextToLegendary if you told as much lies as this lady then probably

@NextToLegendary if you told as much lies as this lady then probably

People have sympathy for women, if it were a man the case would have been closed a long time ago.

Maybe she’s an scp with the ability to manipulate people.

Maybe she’s an scp with the ability to manipulate people.

@thrift shop ghost yup wouldn't have been able to "pay" her attorney (that successfully defended her) with sexual favors either since she was jobless at the time.

@Lil Snitch & DaHomie welcome to the arabic world

@Lil Snitch & DaHomie welcome to the arabic world

we need to bring back public stonings just for this woman

we need to bring back public stonings just for this woman

@Some Dude yes. if this woman was ugly I don't think it would have ended the same.

@Some Dude yes. if this woman was ugly I don't think it would have ended the same.

@SoularSystemGG or don't spread your agenda at all 🤔

@SoularSystemGG or don't spread your agenda at all 🤔

@Tube Guy lmao if you can justify how that opinion is related to the conversation, I'll allow it, if not, go spread your agenda elsewhere :3

And thousands of women get away with abortions every year but that never seems to be a problem to the media

Being good looking definitely helped, good looking people pretty much living their lives in easy mode


Casey cried when verdict was read, because she couldn't believe she got away with murder.

God I hope tony isn't to clingy because this girl just won the murder game

Also is no one going to mention her search history? Look that up, that stuff is real. They found it after the trial because the police didn’t check the Firefox application first(which was what she used most), but instead were looking in the wrong place. Which was internet explorer.

@Morrick you could even see her sigh a breath of relief after the convictions as she could quit having to act. Also her eyes were buggin as she was trying to put together her expressions lol

@AFX QUEST lying doesn't look good, but it doesn't mean she murdered her kid, nor does it come close to proving such a thing. Also the smell in the car could of come from many things, also one must prove that the smell was that of a decomposing body and that the body was that of her daughter, and then it would have to be proven or shown how that the smell was present in the car because of Casey Anthony's actions rather than somebody else's, etc. Do you see how you're seeing things in a very shallow, emotional light instead of through the prism of logic, reality, and proper evidence. Having watched the entire trial very closely I'm very pleased with the call the jury made, and you should be also.

@András Ziegenham that makes 0 sense lol. So he is there and tells her to cover up an accident by saying he is molesting her? Even a terrible cop would have a better plan than that...thats like Forest Gump lvl planning. Even if that was true why didn't he back up her story then? Why would he tell her to cover it up and then throw her under the bus, presenting the most damning evidence to the police himself. He considered suicide because he knew perfectly well Casey is  a psychopath, he basically enabled her.
Furthermore George did not actually admit that "things got out of control" to his mistress. She DID testify to that effect but then later in the testimony also claimed that George had know knowledge of the events.
Casey Anthony does not have the capability to tell the Truth to the point where you can assume that anything she is saying is roughly the opposite of what actually happened. Bitch is stone cold guilty of first degree murder.

This video convinced me she was a murderer. Then I watched a video of her dad talking on day 7 of the trial. Then watched the opening argument of the defense on day 1. Now I'm convinced it was an accident, but her father was the one with most guilt. He left the ladder reachable to Caylee. He was the one deciding not to go to the cops. He had access to the special kind (!!) of duct tape later found on the corpse. He admitted it was an accident to his mistress half a year later and tried to commit suicide a few days after that. I'm pretty sure he also actually raped Casey when she was a child.

@Jor Tra no evidence what about the smell in her car it doesn’t make sense that’s body OF A 3 YEAR OLD WAS THERE OFCOURSE IT MAKES THE MOST SENSE without emotion by the lying she is hiding something she made up a whole story and still she’s not guilty

@GTO she killed her what are talking about did you even watch the video

@nvm did she even call the police or was is her mom ?

@Chad Kirk bullshitting aside, the law is clear, if there's no evidence to condemn, then we don't condemn. Further, are you actually reading her correctly , or are you only seeing what you want to?

@Jor Tra So not calling the police for an entire month after a 3 year old went missing,  lied about how her daughter went missing, googled suffocation techniques, lied to detectives many times and she's innocent...

Whos been drinking the kool ais and got easily swayed by emotions? It seems many in here

@Jor Tra even if she didn't kill her daughter. She is HAPPY that her daughter is dead and doesn't give two shits about her daughter missing. Why did she never call the police?. The first thing anyone whould do is call the police, She never even asks if they found anything about her daughter because she doesn't care. And on top of that she lied almost everything she said to the police. Why whould she lie to the police that are trying to find her?

@Jor Tra oh you have a lot of time on your hands too?
Alright let's do this:
Yes she did

@Dexter P. no she didn't, that's what the evidence showed. Grow up and get off the emotions

@Jor Tra yeah I watched it.  Sorry to have a different opinion than you but I feel different.  She killed her babie

@Dexter P. you're drinking the koolaid bud, I suggest you watch the entire trial as it happened, and if you have half the intelligence God gave a fly, you'll walk away with the understanding that there was no incriminating evidence. She may have done it, but in a jury one has to ho with the law, and the law is clear where there is no evidence, then one cannot be condemned. People like yourself just let the media think for you instead of going to the source and finding out for yourself.

@John Locy totally agreed. I watched the entire case as it happened, there was never any evidence that she murdered her daughter.

@nvm I watched the entire trial when it all went down. I started out indifferent, but by the end of the trial I agreed with the jury. There was never any evidence that Casey killed her daughter. If anything the prosecution arrogantly thought it would be an open/shut case to the point where they went after her in court with no evidence. The jury did make the right call though. The problem with all the folks making comments on here is that they're going off of emotions instead of the facts.

@Manuel Rota I don't think it takes much practice when you do it your whole life.

She didn't cry, you completely missed it, she smiled. She couldn't contain her joy when she heard not guilty the first time and started to smile, she caught herself quickly and turned it into her crying with a mix of emotions. The following not-guilty convictions she tried to show a mixed emotion of happy and upset because of her first outburst of joy.

@GTO nope we are all making our own contributions

what are you talking about? She didn't kill anybody. Did you actually watch the video???

Papa Roach sang it best - Getting away with murder!

Look at her breathing while listening to the verdict - she is completely hiding/suffocating her emotions in the most emotional moment of her life: even than, she is able to keep on her mask. That takes some practice, she must have rehearsd her whole life.

I would to as would anyone else.... but its still cold


Anyone else notice how at 30:07 she says “I can’t even put towards how glad I am that she’s HAD both of you”
And then she quickly corrects it to “still has both of you”
She already knew her child was dead

@Old _Yeller I'm sure 99% of the police knew that and believed she was guilty. Except whatever Detective she started to date later. They clearly saw through the lies and deception. At the end it was the jury that mattered the most and of course are idiots to media's manipulation which plays a heavier role than people think. I think jury should only be trained personnel, completely random and anonymous.

@•ღcutaepieღ• You know what i don't understad? Let's say her daughter did drown in the pool. She was still found with duct tape around her mouth and nose and thrown in a swamp. What does the police think of that? Isn't that a bit iffy?? Why didn't thy mention that? It really irritates me how half asses this whole case was handled

Exactly!!! I noticed that before reading any comments. She keep saying “had” “has been” then quickly changing it to “still has”

Yeah, but she did admit to know her daughter was dead and she "drowned in a pool"

As soon as she said that I was like huh was that past tense

Yeah. Noticed the minute she said that. Smh. I still can't believe this case.


During the trial she played off the sobbing act when her lawyer spoke about her being "Molested" but when the body of her dead child was described she didn't even flinch. Ahh, sociopath at it's finest.

@Panteni87 it's also very warm, how does that fit into your mental argument?

@🍩 r e p l y Yeah, her dad immediately cut ties with her after he saw the trial. He was one of the most prominent figures defending her and saying that she was innocent too. I feel bad for her parents, yeah they spoiled her and didnt properly punish her when she'd do something bad, but they genuinely did want to believe in her innocence; even when all the evidence was stacked against her.

She was raped by her dad she was jel of her daughter for you can imagine why

@Crag Hollywood is very liberal and a nest for child predators.

@Pete Kachew Wow, imagine your daughter lying about you molesting her as a child for sympathy, that's so fucked up. <br>How do you take that in as a father, I hope both her parents cut off contact with her because at that point it was obvious everything was a fabricated lie and she murdered her child. They can't be that blind, can they?

@Pete Kachew Wow, imagine your daughter lying about you molesting her as a child for sympathy, that's so fucked up.
How do you take that in as a father, I hope both her parents cut off contact with her because at that point it was obvious everything was a fabricated lie and she murdered her child. They can't be that blind, can they?

@MOsKOn Yeah. It was a lie made up by the lawyer, they were able to keep up the lie because George wasn't there to deny the claims. And even if he were, he'd have no evidence to prove he didn't do anything. Even one of the "witnesses" the lawyer called up was a convicted felon for kidnapping, he lied about Kaylee drowning in the pool. This whole case is messed up.

@justin denley How does that have anything to do with liberals?


This case literally makes me sick, the evidence was STACKED against her and still Caylee never got justice. Casey does not deserve to be called a mother, she is a monster, and everyone who found her innocent should be ashamed that they are that stupid to let her live her "happiest" life

MandaLa 314 <br>“With” as in dating? Friends with?

MandaLa 314
“With” as in dating? Friends with?

i googled where CA is now. she IS happy. she's with the private detective from her case. she has a job. in August 2020 she gave the AP an interview. she said she would be "dumb" to have another child because that child would get picked on by other children because of "the case"

@edraith Thanks.  I still believe she's guilty and I feel in any other court room, she'd have been found as such.  I genuinely think that her lawyer must have had exceptional skills and making people doubt the things in front of them.  It's also quite terrifying that this woman got off scot-free with what looks like it should have been a clear cut case under normal circumstances.

Any one of the points I made could indicate an innocent, if eccentric, trait.  But when you combine all of them together, it's pretty damning.

But the reason I gave them in the first place was because I've seen a number of people over different videos condemning the jury, which I don't really think is fair if you weren't there to understand how their own minds were affected by it (just FYI, I'm not saying you were implying that, just what I've seen generally).

@Grigeral Lack of empathy, remorse and fear is what mainly defines psychopathy.

Your other thoughts are extremely well put and well expressed and I am personally on the same page that those should not be held true in this case.

@edraith that's not what being a psychopath means at all...

They can still be remorseful about how things went down, or how they were handled, or that they might have even gone about things more efficiently.

I haven't watched the case and while I am pretty sure that she's guilty, at the same time it is not 100% guaranteed.  Was the child asphyxiated or drowned?  Different cause of death.  If she drowned, then was there actually tape covering her airways? This was mentioned once, then nothing further in the video, same with the pool, but both don't coincide well together.

As for her actions after the fact, it's entirely 'possible', however inplausible that she drowned by accident and the girl panicked, leading to her taking the actions she did.  The whole partying thing may have been as stated, to try and gain some form of normality if she was spiralling and didn't know how to handle it, so reverted to past mechanisms, much like someone may turn to alcohol or drugs to mask pain.

The diary excerpt may have been her trying to pen her forced thoughts to tell herself that it was the truth

Do I believe any of the above?  God no...  But the entire point is it's 'without a doubt'. If there are room for doubts, then there simply wasn't enough evidence against her, regardless of how what evidence they did have was painted.

They didnt had evidence for first degree murder but we all know she killed her child.

@Satania d'Villa being a psychopath LITERALY means that you have no remorse at all and that you are perfectly happy with every harm you do against other people. She's way happier than me or you.

Her karma will get her, what goes around comes around

@Mindblow We can't do nothing  nobody really cares how we feel If the poor and the unfortunate kill their own young they will get convicted and most will say it's poor people's problems  Really the criminals has to deal with it, Right??   We have a clear conscious the killers really don't and eventually a killer will crack.

@Satania d'Villa life is unfair and she might be happy right now, and yes I hate it, but what can we do

She can't be happy how could she.  Who's gonna party with her.  She's not a Mom anymore.  She's nothing now.  If I was the Judge I would order an Oophorectomy for Casey


The calmness she displays when she pretends to think her daughter is missing is the most disturbing to me. I lost sight of my son at the park for a moment last week and I was screaming running looking for him. He had just run up a nearby hill and was blocked by a tree but omg. And when they're with their dad and I don't speak to them... it's a hollow feeling when they're gone, your world goes black with terror when you lose them just for a second. This woman is on borrowed time.

@Fremen You may be right. I am not a lawyer though.  You know more about this than I do.

@redlightflash She is methodically evil in her intent.

I wanted to throw up when I saw her smiling as the detectives were talking to her about that little angel. Acting like she was at a coffee shop with her friends. I'm sick to my stomach.

I panicked more than this person when my dog runs off and I thought I lost her

And the way she is able to craft these meticulous lies and weave this sinister story are both signs of psychopathy.

@Sara “OMG like I really need to talk to my potential partner in crime right now, stop wasting my time 👞👞👞, yeah yeah cry over my daughter, such a waste of time”

@kay Watching these type films about these type people is informative but so depressing.

That frantic feeling rushes over you in an instant and it's almost impossible to hide. My 6 year old daughter walked away from me in a store a couple weeks ago and thought she'd test some boundaries by not answering when I called her. After the second time of her not coming and answering to her name I started yelling it and left my cart to search for her. My stomach dropped and she finally answered me when she could hear how worried my voice was.

That’s just called being an emotional woman.

I went to fetch my daughter from my next door neighbors house and nobody was there so I frantically called and they said they had left and Claire had went home and it felt like my whole body was on fire and I could hear my heartbeat in my ears. My knees felt weak and my hands stung they were so shaky. I immediately ran to my neighbors across the street for help and she was there! She got punished for not telling me where she went but it was an important lesson to learn. I never want to feel that way ever again!

"This woman is on borrowed time." - Why? Because she is not a helicopter mother?

I'd imagine that's how a regular mom would react.

I have a little sister and smts when she's playing with smn for example and i look away and look back and she's suddenly out of sight, my heart just starts racing withing 0.1 seconds. so ya, that calmness is really f***ing disturbing. wtf

When I was 5 me and my family went out on a trip to a park that has many rentable bikes. There where many people there so I had my nanny and brothers to keep an eye on me. So I was in my bike which I rode throughout a good length of the road alone, I hopped out of my bike at the other end and decided to do whatever. I walked around alone for a while, eventually I walked back to my bike and my brothers saw me and my mom was in tears. Apparently, they where keeping an eye on me throughout the whole trek and lost sight of me halfway through due to the volume of people. After some time I didn't return they began to panic fearing the worst. My mom never wants to go to that park ever again, really scarred her.

@Heather Spoonheim When Casey talked on the phone with her friend Christine she was definitely distraught, whereas Casey was like "omg such a waste of time"

I don't even have kids, but if I'm out with friends and look around and can't locate one of their children for a second, I feel like I'm about to have a heart attack.  I don't understand how parents live longer than people without children.