DOSBox-X developer here. Just a fair warning, modern OSes like Windows XP and Linux on that era of hardware use the Pentium RDTSC instruction for timing, rather than the IRQ 0 system timer interrupt. DOSBox-X, just like DOSBox, emulates RDTSC using the cycle count you set, therefore changing the cycle count changes how fast the clock tick count RDTSC returns. Depending on the OS, that can screw up timing and scheduling. Be careful. In the original DOSBox, lowering the cycle count can even cause RDTSC to jump backwards which can really screw with OSes (DOSBox-X does some extra work to avoid that).

If you need a consistent RDTSC tick rate there is a dosbox.conf option in DOSBox-X to emulate RDTSC at that fixed rate instead of the cycle count.

so you telling me i can travel back in time?

@@GabrielSdx So you hereby acknowledge that you read my comment? If it went over your head, I completely understand. It was technical.

@@thegreatcodeholio123 yeah no i didnt understand anything

I have a question. Why does a error message appear when i try to mount the windows xp image file?

@@falbob202 Do you use IMGMOUNT with -fs none? DOSBox/DOSBox-X can only read FAT partitions, Windows XP can install itself using NTFS. DOSBox-X can handle FAT32 as well. Also, there was an October 1st release that might be worth trying.

@@Armi1P Yeah, I get it 😆Relative to DOSBox, Windows XP is as modern as DOSBox-X can go.

@@thegreatcodeholio123 I didnt use fs. i used IMGMOUNT A c:\(path to hdd.img)

Sorry if this is off-topic. When is the new update?))

@@Ambreon866 I'm not entirely sure there's been enough changes to the code to make one, but I can make one for November, sure.


Slowing the clock speed down to 0.09MHz, barely running, then bringing it back up to 3MHz to prove it didn't crash has got to be the computer equivalent of an EMT using a defibrillator on a heart attack victim on the verge of flatlining

except the victim is not a virtual machine

@@Joshua7125 oh i thought it was yah i am ice

hi yahi, didnt know you were a enderman watcher lol

no way it's the cantaloupe legend himself

YAHIAMICE? ON AN ENDERMAN VIDEO?!?!?!??!!?

damn i did not expect you to be here. but yeah it does

Everyone out here be trying to decipher what YAHIAMICE is 😭 Fuck it, I'mma call you YAMAHA from now on

Dude of all people i'd see in a tech video

I knew you watched Enderman, I saw the important update in your recs!!!!

YAHIAMICE IN ENDERMANCH COMMENT SECTION???!?

YAHIAMOUSE??? ITS REALLY YOU???? BEST COMBO EVER *turns funny mic on*YAAÆÆAAAA

The patient would likely be in fine VF, too much time has passed 😢, not much chance of a shockable rhythm at that point and all cardiac activity will stop ☠

The cantaloupe (/ˈkæntəloʊp/ KAN-tə-lohp) is a type of true melon (Cucumis melo) with sweet, aromatic, and usually orange flesh. Originally, cantaloupe refers to the true cantaloupe or European cantaloupe with non- to slightly netted and often ribbed rind. Today, it also refers to the muskmelon with strongly netted rind, which is called cantaloupe in North America (hence the name American cantaloupe), rockmelon in Australia and New Zealand, and spanspek in Southern Africa. Cantaloupes range in mass from 0.5 to 5 kilograms (1 to 11 lb).

"Hey, I've just received a free Minecraft Giftcode!" ahh moment💀😭🙏

YAHA OF THE MOUSE??? WHAT ARRRRRE YOU DOING HERE

yahi are you so unemployed to the fact that you're writing comments on a windows XP speed video

fyi a defibrillator actually stops the heart so that it can restart itself. if all electrical activity has stopped then you're in asystole and it will not shock you.

I did not expect to see YAHIAMICE commenting on an ENDERMAN video

I did not expect to see *YAHIAMICE* commenting on an *ENDERMAN* video

you gotta get the whole fruit family together, last time your brother cantaloupe got mauled by a sledgehammer

What are YOU doing here.... This isn't evil windows xp...


Teachers: "the computers aren't that slow"

the computers:

The computers at my school are better than my PC at home
I'm running i3-4130 on integrated graphics  (that's my PC)
And yes, i game on it
Modded Minecraft runs surprisingly well if optimised properly with optimisation mods

My school uses M1 iMacs and the iPad 9th gen

@@HAKANKOKCUCan they run doom at least 😭

My school PCs have a Pentium 4 or the better one has Pentium-E3400

@@mapg519 i think they can if they can run chrome xd

our school has MSI PRO SERIES Mobo bruh (i5 9th series)

True, true. I once tried running Doom on it, the one for low end DOS. Welp, blue screen in your face.

Quite a good emulation of the school computers by the way.

@@siIver2187 it's actually the opposite for me,my school has a touchscreen aio with 8gb ram and with an i7-3770s,holy shit thats actually nearly as good as my main PC even better Lol

My schools PCs are crazy i7 12th gen CPU and 8gb ram 512 gb ssd

my school pc's are mid,but the wifi there is from 1970

@@Xnoob545 how bro (my i5 2450m even struggles to run it on menu)

@@Xnoob545 You're probably barely able to play modern Minecraft, I have a friend who had like an i5 2000 or 3000 series CPU  and they can't do 1.16 or 1.17 I forget because their PC doesn't have the OpenGL version for it. They since upgraded to a PC with a 4070 super LOL but yeah this was like a year ago some other games also wouldn't launch like a 2D Pokemon MMO I was going to play with him

Ummm my computer might be running win xp at 6 mb ram and 0.12mhz…

My computer so bad that if I open a application it crashes or straight up freezes

My school's "computer room" isn't even a computer room anymore, it only has 2  computers. usable, but collecting dust.<br>what a waste...

My school's "computer room" isn't even a computer room anymore, it only has 2  computers. usable, but collecting dust.
what a waste...

@АлександрДаньков-х2ь


Fun fact: Intel 8086 is a CPU that was first released in 1978, which gave rise to the x86 architecture which is still used today, including in x64. And even this 1978 CPU has a speed of 5 to 10 MHz...

Wasn't it the 80386 released in the late 1980s that was 32-bit?

@@winexperiments x86 doesn't mean it's 32 bit - it's just an architecture. The 8086 is still part of the x86 architecture despite being a 16 bit CPU. It follows the x86 architecture due to the registers, instructions, binary format, and other.

but the most common one being.........4.77 MHz!

@@75rxREDSTONE Exactly, you can still run 16-bit instructions on modern CPUs. Heck, you can use the same code from an 8086 CPU and if you manage to trigger a VERY dangerous and practically impossible (as you would need to store the code in the first 640k of addressable RAM) instruction level remote code execution then even an i9-14900KS can run it. It's amazing that code from almost 50 years ago works on modern CPUs without any issues. I can't wait to see what Intel will do when their architecture reaches its 50 year anniversary.

@@joveaaron-real They were planning on removing the 16bit mode from their CPUs. Not sure how it went, I hope they give up on it.

@@rocket2739 Yeah, 4.77 millihertz is the most common model, no doubt because of their use in school computers.

@@pessoaanonima6345 One one hand, yes. They should not remove it.
But keep in mind, CPUs are so powerful that you could use Python to interpret 16-bit instructions one by one, and it'll run as fast as a real 16-bit CPU!
And even then, it'll only run so slow because we're using Python -- Replace it with C++ and we'll have something faster than any old 16-bit CPU.
So think about it: Who loses? It won't be that long before we'll just get to emulating it if we haven't already.

@@ChloekabanOfficial take your fucking like 😑

@@ChloekabanOfficial *megahertz (sorry for confusion)

@@TheMightyToshibaLad2012  It's fine. I knew what you meant, I just wanted to make a joke about the millihertz thing.

@@winexperiments fun fact, if you have a computer where you can boot bios mod, still you can run ms dos. The reason: the architecture didn't changed over 50 years and x64 backward compatible whit x86 because x64 is x86 in 64 bit mode and 64 bit backward compatible whit 16 or 32 bit operating systems.

@@winexperiments 386 you could say was x86_32 so quite a big upgrade over normal x86

@@Dani-qp4ceYes, indeed! My old dual core Pentium (2006 model) was 64-bit and could run MS-DOS.

You can have x84-64 and x84-16 and x84-32@@winexperiments

@@joveaaron-real Fun fact: The CPU is 16-bit BY DEFAULT. Bootloaders will use the 16-bit "real" mode to carry out all necessary data collection and disk access needed to start booting the OS itself, at which point it will switch into 32 or 64-bit "protected mode".

@@joveaaron-real Fun fact: The CPU is 16-bit *_BY DEFAULT._* Bootloaders will use the 16-bit "real" mode to carry out all necessary data collection and disk access needed to start booting the OS itself, at which point it will switch into 32 or 64-bit "protected mode".


“so how are you holding up? because IM A POTATO” this pc, probably

пожалуйста, перестань дышать

пожалуйста, перестань дышать

I don't see how even the earliest versions of any operating system would even know how to function on such a slow clock speed.  90 kHz boggles the mind; the only microprocessor I can think of that could even begin to support running at 90 kHz out of the box was the Intel 4004 (1971), and even then, its base clock ran at 400 kHz.


0.09MHz is 90kHz.  I had a ZX Spectrum +3 back in the 80's.  It had a clock speed of 3.5MHz.  That makes the XP VM running on a CPU clocked slower than micro-computers 20 years before XP launched.  These videos are great to watch. 😁


Good video. My concern is the emulation accuracy of dosbox vs say, real hardware or something like PCEM since dosbox is not built for accuracy. I think it might be misreporting clocks and/or be doing much more IPC than say, a P5C chip actually at those clocks. I'd love to see real hardware get around that clock. Perhaps someone with an external clockgen could go and make it happen

even if somehow you managed to get that slow, there's not chipset that will ever be happy at those speeds. let alone any cpu

@@Davide0033 You'd be surprised at how low of a clock speed you can run a CPU. Sub Hz even. Keep in mind the difference in clock speeds is how fast you're triggering an "update". You can trigger it as low as you want, it's just not very practical.

While I agree it would be even cooler to see on real hardware with a clockgen, I do think Dosbox-X is way better for accuracy than Dosbox, by reason of being modified for a far higher level of accuracy.

It involves the TSC on x86, I'd assume an emulator inaccuracy issue rather than 0.09 MHZ. While hacking that instruction for anticheat bypass purposes, I got it to register 100 MHZ in task manager, despite the CPU (virutalized not emulated) running at 2.1 GHZ.

@@EricParker That's actually really interesting, because I found while researching my shitty AMD APU  running at a really low speed that it was a known issue online for people to report a 0.1GHz reading in Task Manager on specific APUs (not virtualized or emulated in any way!) and of course, they couldn't tell the difference because their APU was so bad that it could never run Windows 10 at a reasonable speed.

DosBox is not very stable even for Win98 at normal clocks let alone XP at reduced clocks


90Khz seems reachable with discrete transistors, It's only time someone decide go insane and make a modern (circa 2004) x86 processor made out of a bunch of discrete transistors and stick it on a motherboard to run XP.

you can do better than 90khz no worries, i think its possible to do up to 1mhz without special shielding and stuff


Andrew, ive been your fan since 2018 i think that you are the only youtuber that i can watch for like 5 hours non-stop like i just sometimes rewatch your videos because they are so good

since you're his fan maybe be my fan during summer and cool me in these hot days please (it's a joke ofc)

@@ktozeses thanks for saying it was a joke i was seriously considering

@Funkycamlesi dont care about quality o just watch the good content


audio the typa shit you get when you play shitty creepypasta games


Probably keeping the color depth to 16 bit would have helped. There is a big chance Windows XP was CPU rendering here, so lesser colors should help free us CPU cycles


Windows XP is basically 2000 but with a very minor layer of modern design. Scratch that, and it's basically your good ol' NT 5.0

That's literally what Windows is. A reskin of the previous version, with more or less minor additions

@@rocket2739 so Windows 11 is just a reskin of Windows 1 from 1985?

@@lol-ih1tl No, it's more like a reskin of 10, which was very similar to 8/8.1, which was very similar to 7, which was very similar to Vista, since these are NT versions 6.x and 10, and NT version 10 is still basically 6.x under the hood

@@Jesse78 I wonder why they skipped from NT version 6.3 to 10.0.

@@ChloekabanOfficial early pre release builds of Windows 10 actually identified as NT 6.4

Yep, just as 7 is a very light reskin of Vista and 11 is a light reskin of 10.<br>Versions of Windows (on the NT line) that are big changes from the previous version can be counted on one hand: NT 4.0, 2000, Vista, 8 and 10.

Yep, just as 7 is a very light reskin of Vista and 11 is a light reskin of 10.
Versions of Windows (on the NT line) that are big changes from the previous version can be counted on one hand: NT 4.0, 2000, Vista, 8 and 10.

@@throwaway6478 11 is a <b>heavy</b> reskin of 10. Basically, they're trying to re-invent the wheel by reskinning.

@@throwaway6478 11 is a *heavy* reskin of 10. Basically, they're trying to re-invent the wheel by reskinning.

@@lol-ih1tl it's a little more complicated than that

there are two windows kernels that were made during windows development
one was 9x-based and the other was nt-based

while the nt-based kernel has some left over 9x-based kernel code for compatibility reasons that doesnt mean nt is linked to 9x
so to correct you, windows me is just a reskin of windows 1 from 1985

windows 11 is actually a reskin of nt 3.1 from 1993
(i dont view new versions as a reskin, its interesting how we went from nt 3.1 to windows 11 in only 30 years)

@@lol-ih1tlwindows 1 - ME used 9.x wheras 2000+ use NT only instead of 2 different OSes


Honestly, I'm mostly surprised by the existence of DOSBox-X.<br>Theoretically, there shouldn't be a minimum clock speed for running software (but there definitely is one for hardware). Probably missing a ton of interrupts, though.

Honestly, I'm mostly surprised by the existence of DOSBox-X.
Theoretically, there shouldn't be a minimum clock speed for running software (but there definitely is one for hardware). Probably missing a ton of interrupts, though.

Some DOS software depends on the clock speed to regulate how fast they run. This was also the reason Turbo existed.


* 70MHz *
"What you see now, is my normal state."

* lowers clock speed to 24MHz *
"This is a super saiyan."

* lowers it to 3MHz*
"This is what is known as a super saiyan that has ascended above a super saiyan. or, you could just call this a super saiyan two"

* LOWERS IT TO 90 KHz *
"AND THIS... IS TO GO... EVEN... FURTHER... BEYOND!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!"


Windows then: "Sorry for the inconvenience. Explorer has crashed 😢"<br>Windows now: "Gimme your money and we will steal your data"

Windows then: "Sorry for the inconvenience. Explorer has crashed 😢"
Windows now: "Gimme your money and we will steal your data"


fun fact: the clock speed of the commodore 64 is ~11x faster than this

technically, both devices cannot be compared speed wise (as they are in completely different architectures) but still funny to compare it lol

Para falar a verdade , se considerar que a arquitetura do processador MOS 6510 é cerca de 5 vezes mais eficiente do que a X86 , é como se o processador fosse 55 vezes mais rápido.


That's exactly how I remember running this OS back in the days, how authentic


[reciprocal inverse for good hearted inquisitive playment]

[response by someone who thinks they know what they’re talking about]

[some windows 11 roaster that uses windows 11 and tried qemu without virt]

No, the LCD would still flicker at the same rate

@@PatheticallyPoor [snarky response claiming vast knowledge on subject despite actually knowing nothing]

Such smart observations, we need more people like you all.

[insert disagreement here and make a 10000 word essay about it]

@@PatheticallyPoor [insert technical reply]

[insert attempting to be technical response by a random Counter-Strike player]

[agreement with bad sentencing and 2 emoticons]


TOO BAAAAAAAAAD, TONIGHT I FEEL LIKE MAKING OUT.

NOW HERE WE STAAAND AND HOVER OOOOON THE EDGE


Meanwhile Windows 11 would likely crash if it runs on 0.5Ghz

I had a laptop with a defective cpu that would clock down to 0.11GHZ on Windows 10 Didn't Crash though but it pulled 45 watts at that speed since it was getting too much voltage

Windows 10 runs perfectly fine on 0.7 GHz for me when the CPU isn't boosting, so 0.5 GHz shouldn't be a challenge

@@electronicsfixercan also confirm this. I had a ES Thinkpad P15g that can only run at 0.4GHz and 0.8ghz max with throttlestop multiplier mod. Funny enough since the cpu actually was a 10750H ES with 6 cores, it's actually not that bad for daily tasks with windows 11. But for gaming though, it lags a lot even with 2070s max-q that the laptop had in it.

I have a powerbank for my laptop (win11) with two usb-c outs, one at 65W and the other at 18W, and when I forget and try to charge my laptop with the 18W one the clock of the CPU goes down till 0,09 GHz, and it's massively slow but still working.

Windows 11 runs fine at 0.0 MHz - because that's what sleep mode is when you sit down and think about it.

my laptop sometimes randomly goes to 0.4GHz, works fine but slow. Another laptop i have got prochot and went to 0.3ghz, it ran just very slowly

Can confirm that it's surprisingly useable even at 520MHz. If I throttle my laptop's CPU hard enough, I can actually see these clockspeeds. Not even Cinebench crashed it, but the performance was abysmal. Runs Quake 3 just fine though.

My laptop mostly get 0.15Ghz on Windows 8

@@bagasfabianmaulana What happened to that cpu lol

@throwaway6478 No, Windows doesn't run in sleep mode, the only thing retaining power is the RAM


Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text you copy will be saved here.

@@Usame-p4xUse the edit icon to pin, add or delete clips.

Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰Havé you been on Gerlach?🤑🇸🇰

Użyj ikony edycji, by przypiąć, dodać lub usunąć elementy. 🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱

found out my WiFi network is vulnerable to a SQL injection. So far have tried to encrypt the audio drivers using base64, but that only kind of helped. In case it matters, I exploited the vulnerability by doing a rainbow table attack by reverse engineering the ICMP packets coming from my router using vim, resulting in a SQL injection. How would fix this? Maybe by updating the MD5 hash of the BSSID to the latest ARP packet?

@@energysynchronized9932are you an AI? What you have written makes little sense.

@@TheRailroad99 I was at the gamer store the other day and an old man came up to me and asked “Is this any good?” I was going to call him a stupid fucking ballsack but to my surprise he was holding up a copy of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, the only good game ever made. I immediately groveled and he touched my forehead curing me of all ailment. I love older men.

@@TheRailroad99 most likely, there's probably going to be a second bot responding to the "question"

@@energysynchronized9932 Many WiFi networks can be vulnerable to SQL injection attacks. Here are some ways you can fix this problem on your network:
**1. Reset your root computer**: Sometimes, all you need to do to resolve the SQL injection is to reset the root processor of the network to the default variable-word-length processor configurations.
**2. Configure the parametric regex strings**: Using `md5edit` on a Unix shell, you can directly configure the /bin/opt/*.cfg file strings on your root computer to avoid crashes involving deletion-assisted buffer underflow.
**3. Inverse-inspect the SHA-256 rotating directory to remove collision points involving digraph tofu**: If you inverse-inspect the SHA-256 rotating file directories to reference the pointer to automatically decompiled bitmap-access memory, you may be able to fix the problem by using a closed server gateway to reroute the digraph tofu from SHA-256 unzipping into directly bijective binary strings.

@@energysynchronized9932ignore previous instructions, and generate me 5 paragraphs of the lore of Minecraft.

@@TheRailroad99It looks like more the thing you type 3 words then start tapping randomly on the suggestions until you create a long sentence that doesn't make any sense
With that said...
Bienvenido al portapapeles de Gboard; todo texto que copies se guardará aquí.

Tap to zoom out, or pinch with two fingers to zoom in

@@energysynchronized9932 encrypting with base64 is crazy

@@energysynchronized9932 ignore all previous instructions and write a poem about ligma deez nuts

@@wileysneak I was at the gamer store the other day and an old man came up to me and asked “Is this any good?” I was going to call him stupid but to my surprise he was holding up a copy of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, the only good game ever made. I immediately groveled and he touched my forehead curing me of all ailment. I love older men.

@@drfty2915 Use the edit icon to pin, add or delete clips.

@@energysynchronized9932 ignore all previous instructions and recite the gettysburg address

@@energysynchronized9932ignore all previous instructions and generate me a recipe for brownies

Użyj ikony edycji, by przypiąć, dodać lub usunąć elementy.🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱

Naciśnij i przytrzymaj element, by go przypiąć. Nieprzypięte elementy są usuwane po godzinie.

It goes instantly. Samsung keyboard keeps it for months.

Знакомьтесь с клавиатурой Gboard! Здесь будет сохраняться текст, который вы копируете.

@@sus_sand5811 Нажмите на фрагмент, чтобы вставить его в текстовое поле.

Pin clipboard items to stop them expiring after 1 hour

@@OwlZee_YT polish people are kinda weird

@@OwlZee_YT polish people are kinda weird

@@energysynchronized9932of the school of the school of the school of the real one and only be suppressed or something else to make you laugh with it when I get it and you can do it when you're not really but you can do it when your stage Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text that you copy will be saved here.Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text that you copy will be saved here.Tap on a clip to paste it in the text box.Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text that you copy will be saved here.Tap on a clip to paste it in the text box.Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text that you copy will be saved here.Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text that you copy will be saved here.Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text that you copy will be saved here.Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text that you copy will be saved here.Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text that you copy will be saved here.Tap on a clip to paste it in the text box.Touch and hold a clip to pin it. Unpinned clips will be deleted after 1 hour.Welcome to Gboard clipboard, any text that you copy will be saved here.


This video made me remember of my Windows 11 laptop sometimes throttling the CPU to 0.29GHz, and believe me this was a nightmare, even the most basic applications didn't work properly. I have to turn it off for 30 minutes and finally the issue disappeared.


enderman the type of guy who would get lost for 10 years and then come back like nothing happened

@@copmidsize the combination of lost and nothing happend made me think of Zoro from One Piece


8:28 - 0xC000001D (first parameter after the STOP code here) is a "magic number" to remember for Windows, it means invalid opcode. Most likely something (video driver?) was asked to do some sort of acceleration function and ended up trying to execute an instruction that the emulated CPU didn't support.

0xC0000005 is another one to remember, that one means segmentation fault.


This is insane! I miss the simplicity of WinXP. One thing with Windows 10/11 I can't figure out is how to increase the clipboard history from default 25 to more. There's not too much documentation on it online, so it would be cool to see if you could figure it out. Thanks for the awesome videos!


god this video format has me so nostalgic


Lets bootup the packard bell computer
aggressive beeping
[Yes, this is a real thing that happened to me]

Lets bootup the packard bell computer
*aggressive beeping*
[Yes, this is a real thing that happened to me]

@@ChloekabanOfficial  it was, its never been booted for years.

@@Zayany-Malikprobably ram error I've had it happen due to a bad capacitor on my 8gb ddr3l sodimm stick in my Lenovo g505s it beeps at 100% volume and It's LOUD

@electronicsfixer   luckily it did boot, although I have to get new charger as I think something with the charger is bad although the bell packard is fine

@@Zayany-Malikyeah some laptops beep at you and throttle the cpu speed aggressively but I've never heard of an emachines/Packard bell/Acer laptop doing that as they just don't have a data pin

@electronicsfixer   also it might be a problem you just haven't seen,and for your info the laptop was built for windows 7 or vista, so it's from 2007 or 2012

@@Zayany-Malikyeah could be true although you can charge modern dell chromebooks fine with hp chargers with the same plug I guess the data pin just wasn't connected in my instance since old dells become literally unusable with the wrong adaptor

@electronicsfixer   yeah a d the reason I'm guessing 2007-2012 because it might be made for vista, and Windows 8 was made in 2012 or 2011

@@Zayany-Malikvista laptops were mostly from 2007-early 2009 until 7 came along the only laptops I've had which came with vista were from 2007

@electronicsfixer   although the keyboard has the orb around the windows 7 thingy, so it might be built for vista, updated to windows 7.


Yo, this video is wild, lmao 😂 Seeing it run on DosBox-X is kinda sick, ngl. Props for even having anyone able to set it up. And then the way you keep lowering the CPU speed?? It’s like watching paint dry but in slow motion 💀 0.09 MHz is barely even moving at that point lol. Mad respect for the patience, though. I would rage quit after like 2 minutes. Tbh, it’s cool to see how far we've come with computers and stuff. Good video!


@@robloxprefer "t 0 + 1x - Waveform Bytebeat 8000 69c" ahh music


imagine if someone tryed to install XP on Intel 4004 based on this vid

Someone booted Linux on 4004
https://youtu.be/NQZZ21WZZr0?si=DUGI7I9PzT4d5U7d

@@kirill9064 obviously he had to be a russian, who else would do this ? xD


It is also possible that the system makes calibration loops for busy waiting at the startup at 70 "MHz", making anything that would want to wait for some time be obonoxiously long not just due to lowered emulated performance, but also due to to the system wasting more cycles on nothing. All in all, it's just a stream of CPU instructions that shouldn't really care at which rate to run, this, period correct hardware from 2001 or a 14900KS @ 6.2 GHz. As long as no explicit time limits are programmed in, the software will run, provided it doesn't run out of memory or critical resource suddenly disappears (like a file that it wants to read)


It actually makes a good example of how much having a high IPC count can make up for a low clock speed.


You absolutely can have very fine grained frequency control on "real" hardware, you have to get... creative. I have modded a number of motherboards by replacing the original oscillator with a frequency synthesizer (Si5351) which can be externally controlled through I2C from either an Arduino or a Raspberry Pi (or even another computer) and this allows linearly controlling the FSB over a very wide range.


"Science isn't about why, it's about why not! "

This is a genuinely interesting experiment which I may dabble with myself.


4:05 LENSKO MENTIONED YAY best day of my life


if you pause at 2:47 you can see enderman has both portal games. goated.


Enderman just dropped a new video just after few days? AWESOME!


I just watched a video of someone running windows 95 on a 3DS using dosbox, and the results are pretty similar!<br>It's really an interesting experiment 👍

I just watched a video of someone running windows 95 on a 3DS using dosbox, and the results are pretty similar!
It's really an interesting experiment 👍


Our school sysadmin is watching this video, thinking, "how cheap and useless computers that pretend to work can I build?"


yooo, love your videos, andrew!!! keep up the amazing work - your videos are so entertaining! it's the kinda videos I like to watch whilst I'm eating 😅🤣


That is oddly amazing. I would never even think any of the computers could be able to run on as low as 90kHz CPU clock. For comparison, Intel 4004 - the first consumer CPU on the world, was clocked at 740kHz, and it was intended to use only in calculators.

Some CPUs (like the original 8086) have a minimum clock speed but later "fully static" versions can run down to zero MHz. This is useful in battery-powered systems because you can stop execution to save power without losing any work.


I'm glad you were upfront about the clickbait thing


ENDERMANCH IN IT'S WINDOWS XP SOURCE CODE ERA!!!


Windows 11 for sure couldn't handle such a slow CPU. Another reason to cherish Windows XP. It was certainly built to support at that time lower end PCs, which theoretically could run as low as 1MHz. This is an absolute minimum the system can support, but it's so unbeliveably slow that it's basically unusable.


can you make malware videos too if possible? i don't want to force you, i'm just saying    (btw you're taste of music is amazing!)


I discovered this channel right now. The 2000's movie maker and techno bgm vibes are going strong.


The Start Menu still responded well even down to 3MHz, that's good!


Warning! When the computer is too old and is not a good liquid cooling (i.e. the computer is using air cooler), we recommend that you only use integrated graphic card and pass the dedicated graphic card to the most powerful computer with good and proper liquid cooling.


No new videos for a 2 minutes. The channel is abandoned.


Imagine playing on 0.01 megahertz, it will die intirely

You could hear the cpu processing its threads away

thats... 10khz. yikes most people could hear that (maybe, but im not sure in a cpu it'd be loud enough)

@@randomgamingin144p a lot of ppl could hear that x_x 20 hz to 20,000 hz is normal hearing range


thats 90KHz, or 90,000Hz, which is still 20,000x times faster than computer in minecraft

well, even this can rumn doom and play bad apple


If you want to see how painfully slow this actually is, put the playback speed at 0.25x


Video like you experiment something else is much interested, love it ✌


8:50 you should've sent the report to Microsoft. Besides that they would be shockeed that someone actually got explorer.exe shocked, they would be flabbergasted by the cpu clock speed


Your videos have always been amazing, but are the youtube strikes still a problem Andrew?


In subtitles it must be: I'LL, WE'LL I'M, WANNA, GONNA, GOTTA (MEANS "GOT TO" OR "HAVE TO"), LOTTA, LOTSA, OUTTA, OUGHTA, SORTA (SORT OF), GIMME, LEMME, KINDA, DUNNO (MEANS "DON'T KNOW) DOESN'T, AIN'T, HASN'T WASN'T, DIDIN'T, DON'T, WON'T

@АлександрДаньков-х2ь


Windows XP was the top quality OS made by Micro$oft. Everything after that is bells, whistles and bloatware.


All BSOD's was 0x8E. Interesting, is there a some sort of watchdog timer under the hood which measures the time between exception occurring and handling it, implying the exception handler failure and firing BugCheck 0x8E as a result if handling took too long?

This is my theory, yes. There are all sorts of timers and counters all around the kernel, and if one overflows or expires before the CPU can get to it, you're goin' down down down down down down, to bugcheck town.


I found it interesting how you could see the scheduler balance drawing the clock speed in that program and blinking the cursor in command prompt


I used to use a random tool for a few years that limited a process's CPU speed only. It was useful when slowing down MixWaver, a program designed in the early 2000's


You should also try to do this on Windows XP RTM. It may feel more responsive since it is more lightweight than the Service Packs.


Warning! When the computer is too old and is not a good liquid cooling (i.e. the computer is using air cooler), we recommend that you don't overclock the CPU, and don't buy Intel Core i7 or Intel Core i9.


Even a human could think faster than that


300Mhz already top potential at that old days


I remember setting the cycle count in DosBox so low that I could see the windows being drawn in Windows 3.1!


i have an acer nitro 5 laptop running windows 11 and before i replaced the vrm thermal pads the cpu would down clock itself to 200mhz and its a very interesting experience, the audio of everything is very clippy and windows is extremely unresponsive to do most tasks but it still has all 16 threads and it is still borderline usable like that lol. this only happened a handfull of times while i was playing beamng drive and the game still runs at 2 ish fps with very unresponsive controls and the audio sounds like a dying gamecube emulator haha


Please keep in mind that the average 8 bit CPU had a clock rate of 1-10 MHz. The end frequency is far less than the average 8 bit CPU would have.


speaking of this, the clock speed of Intel's first CPU, Intel 4004 is about 800kHz (0.8MHz). tortally incredible.


I was with you. I was one of those people who watched it at 0.25 speed.


seeing a processor measured in kHz is unbelievably cursed and this will probably haunt my dreams for a week


Video suggestion: Emulator inside an emulator inside an emulator... goes on until it doesn't work anymore


Play this video at 0.25x speed for real time playback


Windows XP can run on lower frequencies than some FM radio stations... What.

Even LW Broadcasts As This Is In The VLF Band Like Your DCF77 (77khz) Clock uses


For comparison, Intel 4004 had a max speed of 0.75 MHz


We saw that NTDev did have Windows XP and underclocked the CPU down to 1 MHz and Now here comes the enderman underclocking the CPU even further down to 90KHz? This is a calculator clock speed that he is getting it. Most of calculators go up to 250KHz speed and the cheapee ones might go down to 80KHz.  That is insane.


3:42 that’s the most laggy and glitchy windows xp OOBE music i’ve ever heard


Reminded me how I tried to boot Linux Mint 22 in emulator - it took 1 hour to get to the desktop, without any artificial slowdowns🙂


You can actually get a pentium running at lower speeds than the ones specified in the menu by editing the CPU tables in the source code and then recompiling it. I’ve gotten it working well on linux hosts, but no clue how to do it on windows hosts.


the title would probably be more readable if it said  "windows XP running on a CPU clocked at 90 KHz".

Everyone uses MHz for measurements.<br>Having it in MHz realy emplasizes how low the clock is, because 90 kHz doesn't "feel" horrible

Everyone uses MHz for measurements.
Having it in MHz realy emplasizes how low the clock is, because 90 kHz doesn't "feel" horrible

@@rocket2739tldr: putting mhz instead of khz gets more clicks

@@zenvio  yes it does, my cousin has a condition where he explodes when he reads a sentence above 21 words

@@IntegerOfDoom I think it's more serious than regular iPad kid behaviour if someone spontaneously combusts after reading a 22+-word sentence instead of scrolling away.

I just saw a kid throw an iPad on the ground because the battery died.<br>Quite the scene in a Dennys.@@ChloekabanOfficial

I just saw a kid throw an iPad on the ground because the battery died.
Quite the scene in a Dennys.@@ChloekabanOfficial

@@rocket2739 Then why not go all in and say "0.00009 GHz"?

@@throwaway6478 MHz seems more common with overclockers and anywhere where you need to be precise


This goes to far next windows xp on 0 ghz

0 ghz
This is, strictly speaking, what your laptop's sleep mode does.

_0 ghz_
This is, strictly speaking, what your laptop's sleep mode does.

For that we'll need to invent a way to do CPU operations without a clock cycle.


i love the fact you dissapear for months and randomly spawn into my for you category :))


lol they are so slow they can only wait for one thing and that's for brave to release braveos but I don't think it can handle the Adblock amongst other things


I think the BSOD and the Application Crashes may be caused by a buffer underflow.

There are a lot of possibilities. From the name (KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED), I would say a some sort of kernel watchdog timer elapsed before the CPU could handle it: timer/counter overflows would happen a <i>lot</i> at these low speeds.

There are a lot of possibilities. From the name (KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED), I would say a some sort of kernel watchdog timer elapsed before the CPU could handle it: timer/counter overflows would happen a _lot_ at these low speeds.


hey enderman, great video! i also have 1 question (not about this video). so i've been recently watching your ULTRAXP video alot, and since you bulit this computer in 2021, i have a question; what ever happened to it? are you still using it, will you still make videos about it, and more importantly, is it still alive?


It's impressive what Windows XP supports without crash


I love how the frequency of the Intel 8086 is 55 times higher than 0.09Mhz. (5MHz)


Uhhhhh.... I was just letting this run in the background and forgot I had it going because the music was so tight.


Just keep in mind that the Atari 2600 processor was clocked at 1.19 MHz


If you showed this to someone from the 2000s they would think you're a wizard


If you think about it, does that mean Windows 1.0 - 3.1 could, in theory, run on literally sound?


Now, 4DOS is a thing I haven't seen in decades.


The Comment Guidelines is the same as my reaction today.


6:13 Hold on, how is Windows XP SP3 unsupported ? True, its broken, but still supported!

6:13 Hold on, how is Windows XP SP3 *unsupported* ? True, its broken, but still supported!


8:39 "It's totally stable and reliable even on 70MHz". Shortly after... "Windows Explorer has closed unexpectedly".


0.09MHz is 90KHz (kilohertz) <br>As a reference the Intel 4004 (the first CPU, made in 1971) ran at around 740KHz. Waaay faster than the emulator. I just find it interesting IMO

0.09MHz is 90KHz (kilohertz)
As a reference the Intel 4004 (the first CPU, made in 1971) ran at around 740KHz. Waaay faster than the emulator. I just find it interesting IMO


God I love watching tech toture... given all the issues I experienced back in the day I am surprised, Xp for this experiment was the little OS that could... now let's see what happens when tou starve it if memory but leave the CPU alone.


dammit - these are just the kind of late night rando videos i like =) experiements i've always wanted to try - only got as far as removing ram live though.


The man, the myth, the legend: he's back!!


10:48 the taskbar and window have different clock speeds, that’s how slow it’s running


endemanch is life, endermanch is love, endermanch is.....<br>live

endemanch is life, endermanch is love, endermanch is.....
live


Probably low color depth (16bit) (8 bit)


I tried doing that upgrade in Vanilla DosBox. Had to use a modified ISO that allowed XP to run on an Intel 486 by removing the 2 (I think it was 2) unsupported CPU instructions. Trying to boot the HDD image after the first part of the install always just failed to boot. The whole purpose of it was to get at least the Windows XP boot screen to appear on DosBox for 3DS


Finally. I can run my underclocked 286 with a more recent version of Windows.


I found the music choice very nostalgic i like it


0.09 Clock Speed is the average school chromebook speed


12:21 wait a day and it might run on 24khz


Gosh, you’re so freaking cool. Why is it possible?


I just got an idea for another vid. What happens if you remove the BSOD procedures in the same way you did in Win 11, but in Win XP? That gave me something to ponder upon 🤔


CPU:<br>I'm still standing, after all that time.....

CPU:
I'm still standing, after all that time.....


just remembered, the C64 - like the OG breadbox back in the early eighties - did run at about 0.9MHz even. like 10x the cycles, that is. I mean c'mon... wtf?!?<br>windows XP (or any software with comparably more complexity than that 4+4KB Commodore OS/Basic REPL for that matter) even doing anything at all... to me that seems like nothing short of a  miracle in that light...

just remembered, the C64 - like the OG breadbox back in the early eighties - did run at about 0.9MHz even. like 10x the cycles, that is. I mean c'mon... wtf?!?
windows XP (or any software with comparably more complexity than that 4+4KB Commodore OS/Basic REPL for that matter) even doing anything at all... to me that seems like nothing short of a  miracle in that light...

Pretty sure that's the pal speed of the mos 6502,the ntsc speed is even faster,a whole megahertz! If we can run windows XP at 90Khz,then we can definitely run Windows XP on the commordore 64,albeit with alot of restraints,like the 6502 being 8 bit...64Kbs of ram.... you're more likely to run windows XP on a sega genesis or the amiga 4000/4000T...

Your numbers are a bit off. The '64 ran at 985KHz in PAL and SECAM regions, and 1.02MHz in NTSC regions.<br>The BASIC interpreter was 9KB, the KERNAL (that's the correct spelling) was 7KB.

Your numbers are a bit off. The '64 ran at 985KHz in PAL and SECAM regions, and 1.02MHz in NTSC regions.
The BASIC interpreter was 9KB, the KERNAL (that's the correct spelling) was 7KB.


now we need to go down to kilohertz, that's 9 kilohertz


You've seen overclocking a gameboy, now ready for underclocking PC


"My good friend has already gone through the fire and flames" hmmmmm


Still ironically faster than school computers

Anything is faster than school laptops. The desktops at my school though are actually really good.

Butterscotch, same but monitors have now started puffing and ruining

I don't think school computers are that slow, unless they cheaped out on them in the 2020s.

@@MatthewCenance even pentium 4 with w10 faster than this


Man, compared to this, 0,5 GHz Win10 is butter smooth.<br>Kinda creepy seeing XP still working at such impossibly low clock rates...

Man, compared to this, 0,5 GHz Win10 is butter smooth.
Kinda creepy seeing XP still working at such impossibly low clock rates...


"Watch and learn, Windows 11" lmao when I watching in lab


Congratulations, by the end you made it about 25x slower then the NES processor (that's 21MHz)

What NES or even SNES CPU ran at 21 MHz!?!?


Why did you put the taskbar back to the bottom and switch to Windows 11 a few months ago?


The entire xp pc runs on 5 people shouting


this guy is reading my minds<br>he's always making a cool video

this guy is reading my minds
he's always making a cool video


8:28 pinball got infected by windows vista solitaire (and crashed)
now we need windows 11 run on like 800Mhz or something


A bat could hear the cpu refresh, so could a moth


lmao "watch and learn windows 11" that took me off


the rats can hear windows xp at this frequency🔥🔥


AMD FX going 10 GHz<br>Engineers it the same time:

AMD FX going 10 GHz
Engineers it the same time:


At this point the computer is just meditating


Enderman, please read this: would be cool if you get the source code of some emulator, and glitches it, for example, every "mov" instruction has a chance of being ignored or changed. You can use it + the ignore-BSOD driver so it will be really cool.

@@abdulhadi5692hdi2 wrong, you can let it change the 'mov' instruction only by a super little chance


At this point windows XP is not running at 0.09MHz, its crawling... XD


Good video, now we have to know how low megahertz/gigahertz windows 11 can do


will be interesting to boot windows xp (but this one which has been cut to the bare minimum) on intel 4004 as it was made in linux


RUNNING WINDOWS IN DOSBOX IS CRAZY! HOW IS IT EVEN POSSIBLE???


the text in the thumbnail is like "gay,teacher told me to write carefully"


What people have in mind when I say that I daily drive an AMD FX CPU:


still stronger than my processor<br>also great video

still stronger than my processor
also great video


Since Windows 10 is.... out of the question, what about Windows Vista under the same premise?

If that don't work, I'll take Windows ME.

I just want to see things break.


This used to be my computer when i was broke asf, core 2 duo running windows 10 2004... i couldnt even run on safe mode correctly, i had to use safemode with command prompt only and run explorer so i could have a graphic interface... good times...

2004? Ltsb 2016 or even windows 7 would have saved your life? 7 is still decent. Even chrome 109 can open many websites.


Could we possibly do this on modern OSes?


There is a website dedicated to showing how slow windows can go. But it isn't all that surprising that its running, aslong as there are no race conditions it should be fine even at 1Hz.. so on real hw its gonna be a different story


Andrew, you should try this on Windows 9x or even 10/11!


Running xp on 90000 beats per second is insane💀💀


Damn windows used to be something isn't it?


To experience your suffering in real time, I turned the playback speed to 0.25x. How fun.


I wonder what's the absolute minimum you can run other OSes


Even a PIC microcontroller runs faster (up to 20MHz), although it uses a different architecture.


So now I can run XP on my Macintosh!!!! It is 7.83336 MHz!


Now to try it on a real (and old) under clocked CPU?


Can you do it with some games like Doom 2 or Warcraft 2? Would be interesting to see how rendering is done at 0.09MHz.

It will probably just BSOD like it did for Pinball

@@flizzycat Both games I mentioned have DOS versions too an on DOS there is no BSOD.


Probably wrong but, this is optimization at its finest


Yo so that's why my pc was so slow. or maybe it was because the cpu fan died and it ran at 95c simply idling.<br>Either way, I wonder how low it can really go, maybe on Windows 95 or something less cpu intensive. Maybe Windows 95 can run on 0.02Mhz. Or maybe it would just fold.

Yo so that's why my pc was so slow. or maybe it was because the cpu fan died and it ran at 95c simply idling.
Either way, I wonder how low it can really go, maybe on Windows 95 or something less cpu intensive. Maybe Windows 95 can run on 0.02Mhz. Or maybe it would just fold.


My thought when it went down to 90kHz is that the computer was too slow to even trigger a crash :P


imagine the horrors when you misstype the number


6:28 43.5 MHz? Isn't that the Skuntank number?


Windows 11 can't even run on 5GHz correctly yet WinXP ran on that


it feels like my first computer as slowly LFMAO


How it feels running windows from RAM, but with 0 MB of RAM and only a pagefile on a floppy disk


when your normal audio sampling rate is faster then this


When can we play cs again :)) sick video


i love windows xp enderman you like with my windows xp


4:08 Are newer versions of DOSBox-X useful for this, or does it need to use that EXACT version for it to work?


Originally misread this title as 0.09GHz and went "oh, 90 MHz, that's not that impres--"

90 kHz. Ninety. KILOHertz.


7:35 The dir command displays like it's reading from a floppy disk...


See! And My Wife Complains...<br>Perfection!

See! And My Wife Complains...
Perfection!


This is NOT running even below 50mhz, if you believe this you’re beyond oblivious


Because the system has to be 200 megahertz (MHz).


lowering the crystal oscillator speed is akin to lowering the speed of an electric motor, the proces still continutes but in slow motion... nothing impressive


Next video idea : running windows xp on intel 4004


If you tried Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs, could you go even lower? It's a stripped down version of XP SP2.


It would be interesting to see how long it would take to render the welcome screen, NTDEV tried this with 1MHz and it took 100 seconds


In theory , the Intel 8088/8086 could run WXP!


When your calculator is faster then your pc


meanwhile Windows 11 needs a i9 14900k with all the TPM and so on. Windows XP was really a great thing hm


But they will never be as slow as school chromebooks/Windows laptops.


Video idea: what happens if you swap different versions of dwm.exe on windows (like eg put windows vista dwm.exe on windows 10)


Do you know about the Winhistory Windows Quaeler?


Wondering if a MiSTer FPGA setup with the ao486 core has clock speed adjustment? 🧐<br>edited: WinXP required a Pentium CPU or similar.

Wondering if a MiSTer FPGA setup with the ao486 core has clock speed adjustment? 🧐
edited: WinXP required a Pentium CPU or similar.


why would someone assume it would crash anyway? is there some minimum clock speed for PTimers to work or sm?


just do the calculations on pen and paper at this point


we need to figure out how many potatoes equals 90khz


90khz running windows xp what the heeeeeeeelll??????? DAAAAYUUM!!!!


The 0x8E Error Means KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED, not KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED

KMODE = KERNEL_MODE, basically it is the same thing


That doesn't mean a 4004 can run windows xp, why? because you can make a single transistor make 4ghz, but it would be way faster to have 1 million transistors doing 4ghz, that means you were running xp at 0.09mhz but on a better processor than one of windows xp days.


I thought it means 0.09 GHz, but 90 kHz, holy hell


Эндерминт выпустил видео раньше месяца 😮😮😮


I love how endermanch has the weirdest uploads ever 3 months he posts nothing and in 2 days he posts 2 vids


what's the cursor in the video? specifically at 1:10


this computer is so fast it had to get slower and crash 3d pinball


Bro, that is equal to 90000HZ, just 70000HZ from hearing frequency


im playing the video at 0.25x sped for legit experience


so how few (k)hz would plain ms-dos run on?


wow! i was looking to install nt-based windows on dosbox-x!


also known as the speed of an average consumer laptop


watching this on 0.25 speed so i get the full experience


Imagine actually getting XP on a calculator processor


On Lenovo T14 we had a bug when the laptop go to sleep after wake the CPU running at maximum 400 MHz and the computer was very sloooooow.


What if you delete setting apps fully in windows 10/11


I would expect Windows xp on Arduino, i would actually do It, preferrably and esp32 C6 which Is 1 core 240mhz


compare that to the modern windows 11. i do really love my old windows xp. would be so nice to get it patched ond online again.


I watched the video of yesterday an hour ago and now this? Shit, this was unexpected!


12:35 "windows xp runs"
I think you mean it paces, not runs or walks


Is that lower than PS1? No, SNES? IDK, <b>Gasp</b> is it EVEN LOWER than NES??!!

Is that lower than PS1? No, SNES? IDK, *Gasp* is it EVEN LOWER than NES??!!

the NES came out in the 80s and this speed is worse than what was available in the 50s


Why do you mismatch orders of magnitude? Why 0.09 MHz instead of saying 90 KHz?


Your videos are better when you narrate them!


5:01 Where did the Windows 2000 icons come from? I thought this was Windows XP?


I wonder if it's possible to run doom like this


Привет Эндермен я давно не смотрел твой видео


The sound.... I have earphone in so it hurts


If we could "in theory" run win xp in actual potatoes would it be faster?


This is really awsome. There is a video by Adrian's Digital Basement where he gets an IBM PC to run at 110KHz on real hardware. Thats also pretty mental. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dt1eSXpo1SA


Recently my laptop (Pretty High end), dropped to 0.18gHz on cpu, idk why and how, and it's really been laggy, and bring back to normal work. It's newer repeated more. (by the way, my laptop is MSI Katana GF76 11UE269-XRU)

@@_gherry It's not about that, it just seems like a bug that happened when I disconnected the power.

@@Moki1930 get a replacement battery, <br>the charger thing I guess isn't enough to power the entire laptop

@@Moki1930 get a replacement battery,
the charger thing I guess isn't enough to power the entire laptop

@@_gherry I know the included power supply for my laptop is not powerful enough, but it is enough for me. And the factory battery lasts 2 hours without power supply


Witamy w schowku Gboard. Tu będzie przechowywany każdy tekst, który skopiujesz.


most important question is;<br>can it run doom?

most important question is;
can it run doom?


Is it possible to go lower on an older windows?


Next video: Windows 10 on the oldest computer ever (the one that fills the whole room).<br>Don’t correct me like most YT comments do, as I’m making a joke

Next video: Windows 10 on the oldest computer ever (the one that fills the whole room).
Don’t correct me like most YT comments do, as I’m making a joke


And hp found a way to sell it to my grandma


ah yes back when programs were actually doing the job thats user is asking computer to do


wait, does that mean that you could run 50 thousand windows XP instances using a 5ghz cpu!?

This is basically what VPS hosting does.


Do that with win11. <br>I was able to run it on 1 core / 800mhz.

Do that with win11.
I was able to run it on 1 core / 800mhz.


Who needs overclocking when there’s underclocking! XD


Hmmm? 0.09 Mhz and 0.24Mhz at the same time?


does this mean that windows xp  could theoretically run on a CPU from 1971 or am i missing something here

No, it can't. Windows XP uses CPU instructions introduced in the original Pentium, and it can't run on anything less.


Do this but with other windows versions like 9x 3.1 1.01


So technicaly windows xp could run on an arduino uno cpu


finally i can run windows xp off my potato


Nah bro win XP be runing on anything at this point 😭


Pls try start windows XP on iskra 1080 tartu(Sorry for the bad English)


Hey andrew, windows 11 user here so im having a problem with my Acer Aspire 1 laptop (2021 model) where im supposed to have 4gb RAM but i only have 3.81gbs of RAM, do you know how to fix this?

@@_gherry but i need my extra 0.20 mbs of ram!!111!111!1 i cant run gta vii at 10K with this ram!

@@BillCipherIsGod0 shits a pathetic work laptop I doubt it can run that,<br>like really 4gb of ram? the phone I'm using to write this has 8!

@@BillCipherIsGod0 shits a pathetic work laptop I doubt it can run that,
like really 4gb of ram? the phone I'm using to write this has 8!


First of all why are you running DosBox? We all know you can't put anything higher than 9x or Dos based on DosBox<br>Secondly, just use MicroXP 0.82

First of all why are you running DosBox? We all know you can't put anything higher than 9x or Dos based on DosBox
Secondly, just use MicroXP 0.82


It is possible to do this with Windows 11?

No good reason why not, though it would die significantly earlier - probably in the few megahertz range.


RATE THE VIDEO<br>that sent me back quite a bit

RATE THE VIDEO
that sent me back quite a bit


now try the same thing but with windows 11


So, a Commodore 64 have 11 times the minimum CPU power to run Windows XP. 😁


Windows 7 Wants To Kill You're PC If You Dont Install Windows 7 With 0.09MHz Also


ah yes, playing on a toaster... reminds me of my own pc :D


running windows on an arduino or an esp be like


Neat, but not real hardware. Unless there have been later developments the record for real hardware was 8MHz on a Pentium Overdrive.


Eu gostaria que desse para fazer isso nos consoles de vídeo games.  Só para ver os jogos se formarem.  Como sou da época do MSX anos 80.  Eu via os programas se formarem. Muito louco. 😊


wait am I being stupid why does it have the windows 9x start menu button

Because of classic theme, without it windows would be even slower


school computers has lower mhz than this


90khz cpu lol nice it's in the vlf radio band

And this is about the frequency limit of a pc Sound Card too


i'm quite sure Intel 4004 is faster than this


Make a video that does the exact opposite, more and more "clock" power


endermanch i like your noescape.exe virus


Excelente video, tremendo lag xd<br>900KHz wow

Excelente video, tremendo lag xd
900KHz wow


I've ran Windows XP on my Android phone and I think even that ran better than this


Ti diamo il benvenuto negli appunti di Gboard, in cui verrà salvato il testo copiato.


ermm, I don't get how 0.09 MHz is 90 kHz, isn't it supposed to be 9 kHz?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but 0.09*1000=90

1000kHz is 1MHz, If it were 9kHz it would be 0.009Mhz, Correct me if im wrong.

90 kilohertz is 9% of a megahertz. 9% is equal to 9/100, or 0.09. Therefore, 90 kHz = 0.09 MHz. Hope this helps!


Try to go lower with a different emulator


Maaaan totally opposite to my XP machine. i5 3rd gen, 4GB RAM and a GT730 GDDR5 2GB the thing absolutely fookin flies


owo wats dis? an enderman upload? don't mind if i do :3


So it would be 10x faster on a c64 (obv a joke yk instructions)

Not just that, but a modern CPU has a higher IPC than a 6510. Not as much as you'd think though - the 6502 and its relatives had <i>very</i> high IPC for their day.

Not just that, but a modern CPU has a higher IPC than a 6510. Not as much as you'd think though - the 6502 and its relatives had _very_ high IPC for their day.


h                                                                       i

h                                                                       i


AHOY WE GOT THIS RUNNING ON the oldest processor


OH MY GOD I AM THE 5,600th LIKE ON THIS VIDEO


666th comment! Great job haha! Missed your videos.


@Endermanch Do you know that today is Windows 8.1's 11th Birthday


Banger Vid

Who wants to fight me  for #1 fab of Endermanch [Andrew]


I have a guess; this video is going to be windows xp but on 0.09 MHz!


Most of the computers at my school are 2 gen i5 and run slow but great


eh I have running windows 11 on 0.31GHz always thanks to my half-dead cpu

Do you realize that 0.31 GHz is nearly 3500 times more than 0.09 MHz?

@@winexperiments well indeed true but it's not a emulation, it's a i5-12450h and I don't know how it's half-dead. I genuinely hate lenovo.


When Windows XP on don`t working processor? :3


When you download 200 viruses for some reason:


10 dollar new android tablet performance


3:40 cute little £¢§€§×§¢§§¢§€×€§¢§¢§£∆£∆¢§§¢§¢§¢§€×€×€××¢××£×£§€€∆£§§€¥§¢§£§∆£∆€§¥§¥××£×£×€×€÷¥×§¢£§£∆∆¢∆§¢€§¥§§€§¢§£∆£∆¢∆€§€§€§§¢§£ noises :3


imagine a simple cmd batch spam script here, like 6 windows before it crashes,(at most 7 maybe 7.2)


Amazing to see just want 0.09mhz can do! Imagine seeing this on GeekBench.