She looks scared to death right away! Wouldn’t take a genius to see that she’s nervous about something here!


if jodi arias hadn't been caught immediatly, this is how her interrogation would went down decades later... the motive, the constant blabing about unimportant things to avoid questions, that "GOSH" yet another enthusiastic photographer who went crazy stalker mode 😂


“i-i mean i know how this stuff works”
got tricked into a 1 hr interrogation

“i-i mean i know how this stuff works”
*got tricked into a 1 hr interrogation*

@Rose Mary I read up on quite a bit of this. If it was an interrogation they would not have been able to use the footage and would have to read her rights. So they set up the camera and called it a surveillance. That can be used in court. These detectives really thought of everything to make sure she would not be able to slide in and out of loopholes.

@TrueCrimeGuru I’m sure they did 😂!! But I was  just making a dig on her intelligence not asking if she had a gun or not. Thanks for the response tho 🤗

@Bany Sanchez Yeah I didn't realise until yesterday from watching the Craig's List Killer interrogation that in American you can't even ask for a puiblic defender if you're not under arrest so if they just interrogate you as a person of interest all you can do is ask that they stop and say you want to leave but a lot of guilty suspects don't invoke that right because they want to find out what the police actually know so they agree to talk to try and gage how much the police know but that is not in their best interests.

@Sakura's Fish I mean it's been a million years since I last watched the video.

@Sakura's Fish I mean it's been a million years since I last watched the video.

@Sakura's Fish She was fearful of the slight chance but you know it was a million years ago so it couldn't really be that. I reckon she only thought there was like a 5% chance they were onto her but 5% is still enough to make one nervous.

@UpdateDotExe don't tell me...you're a detective? 🙄🙄🙄

@UpdateDotExe don't tell me...you're a detective? 🙄🙄🙄

@Rose Mary  get educated or listen to the start

@Rose Mary  get educated or listen to the start

@Rose Mary True that is her right, but it is also her right to walk out at any time during the conversation, yet she didn't use that, because it would look too suspicious. They wouldn't be able to interrogate her because she wouldn't answer and would get a lawyer, this was the only way to get actual responses out of her.

........Her adrenal gland is about to explode, yet she forgot to say LAWYER!

........Her adrenal gland is about to explode, yet she forgot to say LAWYER!

In her defence, like 90% of that 1 hr interrogation was her rambling about random irrelevant shit

In her defence, like 90% of that 1 hr interrogation was her rambling about random irrelevant shit

@D Cul not in the same capacity as a legal interrogation though

@D Cul not in the same capacity as a legal interrogation though

@UpdateDotExe because they need a confession or at least a record of her lying blatantly to gather proof and close the case for good

@UpdateDotExe they have a system of asking questions, if you dont let them know what you know, you can get them to contradict the knowledge that you have, that way you know they lied, and if they lied then you know they're guilty, and then when you tell them that, you push them harder and they might confess, it's all much faster with confession, id imagine, you want them to confess and repent

@Sakura's Fish did you even watch the video? They used it in court.

@Sakura's Fish did you even watch the video? They used it in court.

ITT: People totally completely missing the emotional component. She's not too stupid to realize ON SOME LEVEL what's happening, nor is she confident in thinking she can get out of it -- no, what's happening here is definitely pure desperation. She's TERRIFIED of the obvious fact that it's an interrogation, so she's trying extremely hard to cling to the hope that maybe, just maybe, it isn't. Or maybe, just maybe, she can squeeze out of it. This isn't hubris, it's denial.

Unless you've faced pressure like a situation like this or a parallel type of terror about a slow-growing desperately unwanted realization, you don't know how overwhelming that force of initial denial and wishful thinking can be. And then the MOMENT you're finally forced to confront the truth, it's truly like a lightbulb flips on in your head and you realize how absurd the perspective you tried to hold onto really was all along. A lot of people with behavioral illnesses e.g. addiction experience long periods of denial-of-obvious-problems, and the longer you're invested in that state, the bigger and harder it becomes to actually admit "I've been wrong this whole time" because the sunk time and energy makes it feel like there's more to lose, so it's a self-perpetuating self-dishonesty.

In short: Y'all keep talking as though she's a rational actor in this moment. She's not. She's panicked and not operating congruently with the situation in front of her even though she does -- part of her does -- recognize it.

@C F but is still smart to ask for a lawyer even if your innocent, the right say “anything you say can or will be used against you in a court of law” against you, not for you

@Blub Surveillance footage. Like, how do you think policing works? Fair and square? It is completely within ones rights to not kill people and therefore wont be subjected to this.

Am I the only one kinda creeped out that they kinda secretly filmed this and it holds up in a court of law?

Am I the only one kinda creeped out that they kinda secretly filmed this and it holds up in a court of law?

@Rose Mary I mean, you were presented with the facts on how they did it?

You wanna hear about the police exemption?  California being a two-party state and that this doesn't matter because of the above.

@Sakura's Fish no thy did it this was so that the video could b submitted as a video rather thn an interrogation bcuz thy knew shed lawyer up. Thy found a way around it. Bcuz thy nvr read her her rights and bcuz the setting its evidence instead of interrogation. In simple terms it was like if thy were in a car that just happened to hav cameras and had the same conversation it would b used in court. So thy hid a camera and she was in free will to speak or not speak. But she was talking to coworkers and she knew wat was up. She thought bcuz the room thy were in she was safe bcux nothing was being recorded. So she said wat she shouldn't hav and now shes in jail.

They hoped a evil genious and discovered a woman who wasn't thinking about that crime she comitted 20 years ago. Like, c'mon, anybody in her shoes would be like "If I didn't went there yet, I will never face jail" and just forget about it. <br>A true ninja must anticipate the anticipations, what a bad kunoichi she was.....

They hoped a evil genious and discovered a woman who wasn't thinking about that crime she comitted 20 years ago. Like, c'mon, anybody in her shoes would be like "If I didn't went there yet, I will never face jail" and just forget about it.
A true ninja must anticipate the anticipations, what a bad kunoichi she was.....

Interview.  Difference being she was free to leave and didn't need to be read her rights.....

Interview.  Difference being she was free to leave and didn't need to be read her rights.....

@UpdateDotExe maybe u know... Because 25 year old DNA is not foolproof. U know... Its good to have a lot of evidence when youre accusing somebody of MURDER.

@pasta they did not smh. You dont seem to understand whats on the line here.

@pasta they did not smh. You dont seem to understand whats on the line here.

@Sakura's Fish This is weird. Why would they even "interrogate" her then if they already know because DNA??

@Sakura's Fish This is weird. Why would they even "interrogate" her then if they already know because DNA??

@Rogue Master I think she was arrogant and thought her lies would work as she'd gotten away with it for 23 years

@Rogue Master I think she was arrogant and thought her lies would work as she'd gotten away with it for 23 years

Rose Mary she would’ve caught on and cause problems with interrogation , so basically they dint ‘interrogate’ here they were just talking and they recorded what she said this using it as a surveillance footage instead of interrogation.

@Rose Mary It was very well explained in the video... Did you even watch it 🤔

@Rose Mary It was very well explained in the video... Did you even watch it 🤔

@Cathy Elliott Jones I think she was trying to mine information out of them to find out how much they knew. But she was arrogant enough to think she could lie to them.

I don’t think she was tricked. She knew what was going on the minute they told her they wanted to talk about Sherri Rasmussen and not an art theft, as she had been told was the reason they brought her to lockup. Her panic, her ego, and her misplaced confidence in her 26 years on the job deluded her into thinking she could handle it. Girlfriend should have lawyered up. Immediately.

Right?!  The way the detective said “take a seat” in the first 2 minutes of this would’ve screamed to me...nah...lemme get a lawyer! You could hear it in his voice that he knew he was fixing to nail her to the wall!

@Eric Morrow I think she's a lot smarter than you're giving her credit for. Her particular skill is manipulation and I think from the get go she was looking for an angle to work the situation by faking obliviousness initially. Sociopaths are narcissists by nature and that's where they can brought down. So her surprise is real once she realize they're onto her.. But, as Stephanie was a cop who tampered with evidence, she clearly is good at using crimes of opportunity. Which is why they had to be very careful.

@Rose Mary she killed a woman and they knew this already

@Rose Mary she killed a woman and they knew this already

@Rose Mary I thought the same thing. But I wonder if that's why they were clear to make the point that she was there on her own free will and she could walk out any time.

@Rose Mary It wasnt an interrogation; it was a consultation.

@Rose Mary It wasnt an interrogation; it was a consultation.

Jeez, gosh, jeez you know, gosh, jeez...I mean we wee just gosh,jeez,let me gosh jeez....awffful witch she is.GOOOOSH,JEEEEEZ,WHAT,WHY,JEEEEZ,GOSH!

Took an hour for the penny to drop! That too after 25 yrs of doing the same job. But it does make one feel a bit awkward to know the amount of deceit that goes on. Rights not been read, so admit it as an accidental surveillance footage.

I guess she was still thinking if she lie the right way, she’d get away. Normally if you have nothing to hide, the first instinct is to explain your way out instead of asking for a lawyer(even if that’s the right thing to do). She is trying to act like she has nothing to hide.Asking for a lawyer immediatley paint a picture that you may be guilty because you do not want them to poke around. Innocent ones would consider that unnecessary, because they have nothing to hide.

@Sideliness """  SURVEILLANCE  FOOTAGE  ""    is  actually  what  they  called  it   watch  this video  again

@Sideliness """  SURVEILLANCE  FOOTAGE  ""    is  actually  what  they  called  it   watch  this video  again

Tbh the officers did SUCH a good job at relaxing her emotions whenever she would get all "wELL WHAT DOES THIS MEAN"<br>But STILL LMAO BLABBING FKR A WHOLE HOUR LOL

Tbh the officers did SUCH a good job at relaxing her emotions whenever she would get all "wELL WHAT DOES THIS MEAN"
But STILL LMAO BLABBING FKR A WHOLE HOUR LOL

When they mentioned John she new. A living breathing sociopath they think they can outsmart anyone... Narcissist classic...

I think she knew what was going on the whole time. She wanted to know what they knew and played along. Clearly, she’s no genius, but she was a long time detective. She knew she hadn’t been read her rights and assumed everything she said would be non-admissible in court.

@Sakura's Fish He literally says it was used in court as "surveillance" footage...

@Sakura's Fish He literally says it was used in court as "surveillance" footage...

@Rose Mary they already said they submitted it in as survalince because it's technically not a interview.. they asked her to meet them in a different location and she came in and answered questions at her own free will she couldve left any time or never came. They just so happen to have a hidden camera and she was just slow enough to not realize she was talking too much. Its just co workers meeting up having a chat.. she not under obligation to answer anything she did on her own free will.

I was thinking thinking she was slow for a detective

I was thinking thinking she was slow for a detective

@Bany Sanchez I was shocked how easily they tricked this 25 year veteran.

@Bany Sanchez I was shocked how easily they tricked this 25 year veteran.

@Benny_M92   yes, exactly. She doesn't know this is an interrogation because there is no charge on her. They are only gathering info and may use it for court but does not guarantee is gonna be used as interrogation, even though it is

@Rose Mary Since she was a cop and knows the protocols the detectives had to take a different approach. That’s why they brought her into a discreet location to meet up and interview her. This video was secretly recorded and turned into court as “surveillance video” evidence rather than “interrogation video” which would have been easily tossed by her defense attorney since she was not read her Miranda rights.

@Sideliness 🤔 i lowkey remember the video saying they didn't use it but maybe they did...i wouldn't trust my replies much

@Sideliness 🤔 i lowkey remember the video saying they didn't use it but maybe they did...i wouldn't trust my replies much

@Sakura's Fish it was used in court as surveillance video

@Sakura's Fish it was used in court as surveillance video

They overestimate her and also overprepared for this interrogation.

They overestimate her and also overprepared for this interrogation.

@Rose Mary yes but the video they recorded wasn't used in court. They knew it was her cause the dna, but no regular interrogation would work so they did this scam not to show it in court as proof like regular interrogation where they read your rights but only to see her reaction as part of the investigation

I still don’t understand how they were able to interrogate her without first reading her rights.  Just because she would know to immediately ask for a lawyer, I mean that is her right and they did deny her that.

Nope, she knew way before. That's why she was so nervous, lying since the beginning and said something like ''well they're saying i fought her, that doesn't mean i killed her'' way before freaking out and 'realise' she is a suspect. She was just pretending coolness and cooperation all along

Bruh 😂 that light bulb 💡 took the longest to turn on 🤦🏽♀🤦🏽♀😂 she was a cop?? Who tf put a gun in her hand!

Bruh 😂 that light bulb 💡 took the longest to turn on 🤦🏽♀🤦🏽♀😂 she was a cop?? Who tf put a gun in her hand!


No matter who you are… don’t talk to cops. Especially in an interrogation room.  Never treat them as friends… because they are the furthest thing from a friend.


While there is no detail given on John Rutten, how much had he led Stephanie into believing their relationship meant more to him?  Had he continued to maintain two relationships at the same time recognizing that Stephanie was vulnerable and easy to manipulate?  Stephanie clearly had wanted more from her relationship with John.  John may have even demonized and devalued his wife to Stephanie to give Stephanie hope their relationship would persist.  All this becomes more possible from John Rutten's self-serving speech in which he attempts to describe how unquestionably valued his demised wife was to him, yet where is any reflection on his role and possible fault in this tragedy, such as underestimating Stephanie's devotion to him.  After all, she committed the murder for him or to be with him.  I know this series is to demonstrate the "cleverness" of these police interrogators, but there is a human story here about vulnerabilities on both sides and manipulation, deep unsatisfied needs, and poor strategies for addressing those unrequited needs.   Stephanie clearly did not hold herself to high esteem and somehow felt that the acknowledgement of someone like John would make up for what she lacked.  Despite her smarts, good looks, sports physique, and other admirable qualities, she saw herself as inadequate and so desperate she would kill someone.  Context!!!  Give us context guys!  This is a human tragedy not some clever game of Truth or Dare.


she was clearly guilty but i find funny that when she does guilty behaviours the narrator is like "ah the behaviour guilty people tend to do" and then she does innocent behavior "ah she is faking this innocent behaviour because she knows how" im glad this time it was on an actual guilty person but it seems kinda biased against the person being interrogated


Heres a tip for anyone committing a crime the cops call you in to talk to them have a lawyer and say you were molested by cops at a young age that will deflect you looking guilty for not speaking to them


whenever she is being truthful she looks like a normal human being but when deceptive she literally turns into a tomato from VeggieTales

I grew up watching VegieTales 😂😂 Glad this comment came up 😂

LMFFFFAAOOOOOO THESE COMMENTS ARE KILLING ME 💀💀💀💀VEGGIE TALESS 😂😂😂😂

@🌹Paifu™🌹 she turns into the sussy guy in the first time stamp

I'm only 2 minutes in and now I'm waiting for that face to pop up.
8 minutes in still no face yet 😑.
10 minutes in, she looks like a ventriloquist doll👀 smacks table 50 times

I'm only 2 minutes in and now I'm waiting for that face to pop up.
8 minutes in still no face yet 😑.
10 minutes in, she looks like a ventriloquist doll👀 *smacks table 50 times*

She looks like Alex Jones wearing a wig.

@Red Face Gaming yeah, thats some fine work from these gentlemen they better have gotten a promotion

@Aditya 999 At a certain point you must figure you have gotten away with it. Maybe you have that little nag at the back of your brain saying you get caught somehow, but I bet this lady thought she was in the clear. God bless the detectives who caught her!

@awesome220 i know right, lol, i gues she thought she got away

She had 26 years to get her story sorted... lol

fr her acting is so bad omg i'm having a hard time watching this 😭


“If you guys are claiming that I’m a suspect then I’ve got a problem with that” 😐 cope. Saying that just MAKES her sound guilty lmao


What a cold hearted piece of work…very happy she is right where she belongs.


These two Detectives have got the patience of a saint.


Soon as they asked do you know John Rutten, in the moment she knew why is she there and that they have something against her!!! But she wasn’t prepared for that. She thought the case is closed for ever.


Imagine this transcript being read out in court in a monotonous manner.

@mykie Glad to know I'm not the only one

To be fair they would probably paraphrase it

Now all I can imagine is ace attorney characters reading it out and its the funniest thing to me

"A what's eh heh hehe eh what's this all about"

According to the transcript during the interrogation <b>reads</b> geez, gosh, I barely remember that, ummm... God. Uhhh, in Hawaii? I was with my friend greg umm, then I went to business school down town. Geez.

According to the transcript during the interrogation *reads* geez, gosh, I barely remember that, ummm... God. Uhhh, in Hawaii? I was with my friend greg umm, then I went to business school down town. Geez.

Are descriptions of the facial expressions included? That’s half of it honestly


That thing she did with her mouth at the very end (24:59) is the creepiest thing I've seen in a VERY long time. I'd swear she looks like she's possessed by a demon.


You know your content is really good when you are almost at 5 million subscribers without posting in a long time

@Agnieszka Bryk very sad. JCS I was here when they only had 100 subs. A lot of ppl think that the narrator is JCS but he's not

He wont upload anymore because of youtubes rules


This is great.  If anyone wants more detail read the book The Lazarus Files.  It tells the story of how the cold case detectives tracked down the murderer.


imagine think that you went years not getting caught to finally getting caught— that’s crazy!


Imagine if they asked, “did you kill her,” and her response was, “I don’t think so”

<b>Crazy Woman:</b>  "Did I kill her? Uhm, well, I mean I might have, but that was like a million years ago. Does it still count? I mean, what's this all about?"

*Crazy Woman:*  "Did I kill her? Uhm, well, I mean I might have, but that was like a million years ago. Does it still count? I mean, what's this all about?"

“It was a million years ago! I need to look at my pictures”

“Gee, gosh, idk…. Maybe… I might have..”

I don’t think so! I mean… gosh how long ago was that

@Suzzie Dawn My ex gf took creepshots of me constantly, when we were just talking, like in middle of anything literally, and even when I was sleeping.
We broke up, and half a year later she was begging me for some expensive perfume and I told her I'm not her credit card and told her I might have found someone and she sent me a pic of her cutting herself and accused me and dared me to call an ambulance which I did.
the next week she stalked me behind the corner and waited for everyone else to leave and she rang the doorbell over a 1200 times and knocked on all windows around the house and stood in the backyard while sending threats from her sister's phone, and then she made some gay dating site profile with the creepshots and creepers bombarded me during the night with calls and texts and I had to change my number as well as call back and ask the creepers where they found my number and take screenshots of the site before asking them to remove it.
Had enough of it, and had enough proof to sue her.
But I forgot to mention when I gave my word to the police, that when my dad saw her lurking behind the corner and went and told her to walk away before he calls the police, she had her hands behind her backpack. She asked to talk to me from my dad and showed her hands. Like every innocent people always do, show that their hands are empty. Since she cut herself and was hiding something, I don't think she would have "talked" to me with her mouth like she asked to.

“God, I mean geez… that must have been such a long time ago.. you know.. it’s 2009… well I had my first child 1998…. My dad stopped doing drugs 2001… I couldn’t even tell u  the last time I had orange juice… I mean gosh you know… because I mean I love yoghurt but then again the texture of my mattress… <br>I couldn’t even tell you!”

“God, I mean geez… that must have been such a long time ago.. you know.. it’s 2009… well I had my first child 1998…. My dad stopped doing drugs 2001… I couldn’t even tell u  the last time I had orange juice… I mean gosh you know… because I mean I love yoghurt but then again the texture of my mattress…
I couldn’t even tell you!”

“Gosh, there were so many people I don’t even know who was there… let’s see.. there was Mike….. that was probably about a million years ago like I said….”

“……but it sounds familiar now that you mention it”

I mean, gosh... it was like a million years ago

"I dont wanna say i never killed her, i dont wanna say it took 3 mins, 30 minutes, an hour. Gosh, i mean, it was so long ago. I mean, I don't know, I couldve killer her anywhere........ IF I did... Which I didn't, because gee golly gosh. Its been millions of years. 😏Jim Jascal, and Roy suckaboo. I coulda met her there, too. I cant even say thats a true statement.😏 Doesnt ring a bell."😏😏😏

Doesn't ring a bell but i may have, again this is a million years ago.

this made me laugh way too hard. thanks.

“Surely if I killed her it would be in my<br>Pictures! !” 🤣🤣

“Surely if I killed her it would be in my
Pictures! !” 🤣🤣

“Gosh… it was so long ago… that’s not ringing a bell…”

i mean i dont know geez, gosh it was so long ago you know? i couldnt even tell you the last time i talked to her? its 2009 and i met scott in 1992, gosh!


Stephanie Lazarus : “ I dated other guys, went on lots of vacations.”<br>Kanye West:”I ain’t saying she a gold digger”

Stephanie Lazarus : “ I dated other guys, went on lots of vacations.”
Kanye West:”I ain’t saying she a gold digger”


How could you function for 20 years knowing you had murdered someone. I accidentally ran over a duck and was mortified.

That's what separates a psycho/sociopath from a normal person.


Funny how she mentions how she had a fight with the wife even though none of the officers said anything about it and she previously said she hardly spoke to the wife lol


She makes THE strangest facial expressions during this interrogation! Like Jim Carey-level expressions. I've never seen that before.


Detective: “did you kill her?”<br>Stephanie: performs full facial workout

Detective: “did you kill her?”
Stephanie: performs full facial workout

It wasn't even close on her part, she fell completely apart and was probably passing gas through the whole interview.  Her last taste of freedom flashed before her in the form of a guilty flashback.

@Novalovan Listen to those noises she’s making! Kind of obscene really.

This entire interview was a facial workout

...gees it was a million years ago, Did I kill her? I couldn't say, I might have killed her, but gees what year was it...

@Organs    40:37 most intense workout was here also sorry for your loss ❤

@HappyTrails she/he is so cute! After my dog, coco passed away, I perceived that my other dogs will too. I have 7 dogs. And having them all pass away one by one is the worst thing ever. Your dog is really cute! My profile picture is coco.

@Organs No problem, I know exactly how you feel, and it is so hard, here is my pup http://imgur.com/gallery/8C2QvOW

Hopefully you can click that,

But, it took me 7 months before I thought about getting another dog, but life has to go on and you just have to love them as much as possible before there time comes. Best wishes and I hope you start to heal, as they say, they are waiting at the rainbow bridge.

@HappyTrails thank you so much. I haven’t been able to talk about my dog. Having people like you around me is wonderful.

@Novalovan HAHAHAHA what tf is wrong with her face 😂😂

@Organs sorry for your loss, no need to explain you username❤

@Novalovan "I'm a nobody" - Charles Manson

@Organs this whole video is her performing face workouts lol

Fr she has a jaw line after this lunch break 😂


This is the most unfortunate entertaining interrogations I've ever personally seen!


I just love her. The way she slowly crumbles. Love it. Just love it.


1:44 „Do you know John Rutten?“ Her lying by pretending to be unsure already starts here, when pausing long before finally answering the question. Literally at the first question of the interrogation.


I am so sorry for Sherry's husband. He is older with white hair and he has missed a life that might have been very a happy one with kids. He lost the love of his life. I wonder if Sherry's parents were alive to the the conviction of the evil witch.


Alternate title: Woman tries to break the world record for most facial impressions of a clown mask in an hour.

Meanwhile there are people like me who have like two facial expressions

She def tried to do over reacted faces so that way it would be "easy" to read her emotions and demeanor hoping the cops would take a step back as if she was really thinking. Shes just terrible at acting xD

She reminded me of Jigsaw with the cheekbones

｡*♡ 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓭𝔂 ♡*｡

She definitely broke that record, Olympic status


Did you had to remove the first part of the video? :( if yes it is a shame, it gave a lot of context. But the analysis is still incredible as usual.


Really tough to see the husband read the statement in court


This and the Russell Williams confession are my favorite videos!


I can imagine her with those eyes doing a regular stop on a civilian , and taking advantage of her power on anyone she can.


This woman apparently knows nothing about her own life.

Acts like 24 years ago was when fire was discovered.

@Marta P I see you came from the Jennifer's Solution video too!

apart from if it’s about her one really nice trip to hawaii


Investigator: “Did you know the woman you killed who was married to a man you were in love with?”<br>Stephanie Lazarus: “Uhhh… I may have.”

Investigator: “Did you know the woman you killed who was married to a man you were in love with?”
Stephanie Lazarus: “Uhhh… I may have.”


Oh My God! If this woman were to be a common citizen, i could still understand the melodramatic expressions but a cop for 25yrs?? She might as well have written a guilty verdict herself...


27 years is a long way from a million years...life is short and the longer you live you realize that even 100 years is not that long ago.


Like the Jodi Arias footage, this broad is also gold. You can see right through them, but they are trying desperately to create a story on the fly that they construct right before your eyes.


If someone was actually innocent they’d answer the questions straight out and not try to pretend it was <b>a million years ago</b>

If someone was actually innocent they’d answer the questions straight out and not try to pretend it was *a million years ago*

@bob smith no they wouldn’t. An innocennt person is usually more direct, and doesn’t waffle

Yeah from her point it’s like ‘what should I remember’ a lot of these details I’m sure she remembers incredibly vividly and it might seem suspicious if she remembers all these minute details from 20 years ago. That said She’s got an awful poker face and isn’t good at playing dumb. Oh and she’s incredibly annoying lol

@bob smith They'd have to first read you your Miranda Rights first.  You can lawyer up after that or talk bs.....it's your right.  In this case, they knew she was going to be arrested as soon as she walked out that door.  They just figured they'd feel her out beforehand.  They didn't need a confession from her.  They had her DNA.  This interview would have never made it to court anyway, and they knew that beforehand.

Ideally you'd be in an amused disbelief at the fact that you're a suspect

Knowing my forgetful ass I'd have a hard time 😂😂

Hmmm an innocent person would answer with a totally different demeanor and the detectives would have picked up in that but they already knew she had dunnit

Not really because anything you say can and will be used against you. An innocent person would just be confused and answer questions with questions.


She remembers every little detail, except the answers to the questions.


My favorite part is the end when she says she wishes she had tape recorded the interview…as if she thinks that it went well for her.


Crazy how a killer just hangs out in life


Stephanie remembers every little detail all except for the murder! She keeps talking about it was a million years ago like that's supposed to make it okay


her mind: play dumb!
her: what year is it now?
her mind: not THAT dumb!!

@RazzBerry spider man into the spider verse. If you havent seen it def watch it

I like this comment think it’s my favorite out of all the Jcs videos😂

"Geez, I don't know... I may have looked at a calendar sometime this morning but .. gosh... I don't know maybe? Geezzzz"

This could be a conversation Homer Simpson has with himself!

@Alexandre Siqueira the perfect comment doesn't exist

Awesome comment!

Who TF really asks “what year is it now?”

@Jeremy Oliver I don’t know it, though it’s still funny, what’s it from?

Ooo I remember these lines from the 'spiderman into the spider verse' movie! teehee🤭

Yoooo I read this line the moment she said it 💀💀💀

@Finn pretty sure its miles morales from into the spiderverse

honestly tho, as soon as anyone asks me what year it is, my mind blanks out LOL

@Horace Benedict just did some research. Wasn't her

@Kavien H damn, how didn't I recognize him

@Finn I think it's the girl from Inside Out

@Chunky soup fuck, which character is that again.

Owen Kitchel yeah, yeah, i get it all the time.

This sounds like the most realistic thought process bc same 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I like this reference, if you know, you know


If only her husband thought Sherri was so amazing when she was alive...Sadly he took her for granted, cheated and exposed that great lady to this psychopath.


The reason why she isn’t or can’t answer the easy questions is because her mind is solely focused on what the detectives actually already know.


i just came back here because I can see so much of this lady on Amber Heard and her ridiculous divagation on the responses on her trial, when she starfts giving unasked details for a simple yes or no question. Honey, we know you're lying so cut the crap.


The table slapping would have made me arrest her 😂 Stop doing that shit. 🤯


“did you kill his wife?” “oh geez maybe once or twice it was a million years ago”

I wouldn't wanna say 3 times, I don't want to make a false statement.

Ariel אֲרִיאֵל

Oh lord forgive me, I literally just laughed out loud when I read this comment, oh maybe once or twice is what got me lmao. Good one!

Let me think....we’re dinosaurs still around?

Let me think....we’re dinosaurs still around?

"But I cant even say that... Maybe it was three I dont know... gee I mean I dont want to lie maybe I didnt even do it!"

I remember 20 years ago like yesterday n I'm only 34 I go back when I was 5 she fronting  smh 🤦 a million years ago girl 👋 bye

random 11k comment gem hidden in the dust.

random 11k comment gem hidden in the dust.

Alright, this is why I paused the vid to read the commentz XD😂

@Charles Tilley Sorry to hear about that.

@Charles Tilley Sorry to hear about that.

@Charles Tilley She wasn't innocent though, the crime had been solved by her DNA present. Her Miranda rights were denied because in this case there was overwhelming evidence she had committed the crime. I know, it's a tricky one that!  I don't see it as a betrayal - cops did their job.

dominic brown How would you like it if the tables were turned ???? It’s not fair .

i don't know if its funny or sad that she <i>could</i> have actually killed her twice considering the details of murder

i don't know if its funny or sad that she _could_ have actually killed her twice considering the details of murder

@Lucy Chews I cracked up at the word "golly" 😂😂

@Lucy Chews I cracked up at the word "golly" 😂😂

Once or twice sentence killed me. Uh, no pun intended

☆å ł t ä į r

gee, i killed her twice when we both played call of duty.

That was the most genuine laugh I’ve had in a while, thanks for that 😂🙌🏼🤍

No other comments are needed thank you, Good Bye!

No other comments are needed thank you, Good Bye!

The judge would give her 10 just for her facial expressions.

Charles Tilley uh first of all oj Simpson is guilty - it’s indisputable. <br>   Called 🧬 DNA

Charles Tilley uh first of all oj Simpson is guilty - it’s indisputable.
   Called 🧬 DNA

dominic brown well it wasn’t too original of a joke kiddo

Chris B i made the joke on my own free will. i didn’t search through 50k comments to steal someone’s joke. that’s a kids game

Marcos J yes this joke is all over the place in these comments and he was not the first to make it

It’s just not ringing a bell. Doesn’t sound familiar.

It’s just not ringing a bell. Doesn’t sound familiar.

dominic brown All these people think it’s funny, but if a male did this y’all wouldn’t be joking bout it. Y’all would be calling her a psychopath & the comment section would be filled with nothing but hate. But since the gender roles are switch y’all joke about it.. 🤦🏽♂

domenic brown once or twice huh ?? Really now ??😹😹

domenic brown once or twice huh ?? Really now ??😹😹

@Charles Tilley <br>because she is guilty

@Ouija1210 She is guilty and wanted to get caught. She is out of control

@Charles Tilley nothing wrong wirh solving a homicide. Whats wrong with you. Suppression of evidence...

Into the fray day by day the clock keeps ticking away, until the day you say it ends today

"did you kill his wife?"<br>"Oh geez... That sounds familiar, but, I mean, what's that got to do with me dating him?"

"did you kill his wife?"
"Oh geez... That sounds familiar, but, I mean, what's that got to do with me dating him?"

@Arby’s Fisted She couldn't had left, due to the DNA evidence, they weren't going to give her a chance to flee from justice.

My only point was the betrayal of her co-workers & not advising her that anything stated can & will be used against her in court (Miranda rights).

I've been a suspect (& initially) convicted) myself, although nowhere as serious as this & knew to keep my mouth shut.

Yet on appeal, to the State Supreme Court after I had served 3 years of a 10 year sentence & eligible for parole (of which I turned down), the main or Star witness turned against the State, told the truth. I wear & need glasses to see, would be legally blind w/out them. The cops showed her a page of pics, she couldn't ID one, gave her 3 hours in the room w/out as much as a bathroom break, then came back in & pointed me out & said 'he's the one, has to be' & she then agreed under immense pressure.

After her testimony, to which she apologized to me, even as much as offering me a place to stay if I didn't have one, the judge sided with me & walked out the door a free man. And I took up her offer for a place to live, she took me to lunch. As I had no place to call home, she helped me get employment & allowed me to save to buy a car & get my own place, refused to take a cent from me.

About a year later, I was awarded a monetary claim for the loss of my freedom, loss of job & home, repossession of truck & granted a full & unconditional pardon from the State.

But back to her, I don't believe she would had walked out as I did, DNA evidence is compelling. Mine was a case of misidentification by crooked detectives essentially bullying the main witness. I'm by far not the only innocent person who has been in prison. In my case, her conscience set me free.

The true person who committed the crime was sentences to less time than myself!

@Charles Tilley for real. You think someone's your friend, but it turns out they're secretly a murderer.

@Charles Tilley I see some books in the making!!! One being, I bet you by golly wow. No that's a song. Gee I'll think of something later. Goodnight and don't forget to keep your stories straight and you won't get pinned.

@Arby’s Fisted I agree, she should have had the intelligence to walk out of the room & got the hell out of the area. That video did her no favors. Still, a suspect is supposed to be read their Miranda rights before questioning, no matter the setting. I know, have been there, done that & by keeping my mouth shut until my attorney arrived, got out of a jam, although nothing of this nature, rather a misdemeanor charge.

Their 'proof' hinged on the testimony of a woman who was coached by detectives to pinpoint me by pointing at a picture of me (from a 15+ year old DWI arrest) at her, saying 'it had to be me' & under pressure, she gave in. Even though I needed my glasses to see, would be legally blind w/out them. She insisted in court that the real suspect didn't wear glasses, his hair was longer & voice different. Once the judge heard this from the actual victim, how the police treated her, he tossed the case, one of the detectives was forced to resign. BTW, I was at work when the incident took place, but since I worked alone & not far from the area, there was a lot of assumptions involved.

The only ties between the eventual real convicted suspect & myself (he hit the well one time too many), were we both drove the same type of truck. By the time, the suspect hit again, I was no longer working in the area. The lady also insisted I was called to make an impact statement, that his crimes cost an innocent man money in legal fees & an overnight stay in jail. If we were a man of wealth, I would had sued him for all he owned, yet his belongings were all in the van he also slept in. Yet I did let him know he was a sorry POS, he was sentenced to the max, two 2 year sentences, to be served after the other (consecutive) w/out the option of parole. With 'good time' & work, he served just over 3 years, 11 months les than he should had, in my & the victim's opinion.

This is where people gets railroaded, talking to the cops w/out an attorney present. However, my Miranda rights were read to me before they attempted questioning, that what I say could be used against me & I had the right to counsel. I didn't speak w/out the lawyer being there & only answered the questions she suggested. Always insist on a lawyer, even if cannot afford one, cops AREN'T your friends, they're PIGS!

dominic brown shouldn’t have let him punk you

dominic brown shouldn’t have let him punk you

2.6k like on 3 weeks? Yous a legend, my broseph

2.6k like on 3 weeks? Yous a legend, my broseph

"Geez! Gosh golly gee willikers..geez, ya know?"

"Geez! Gosh golly gee willikers..geez, ya know?"

She should had caught on fast, knowing (if guilty as charged) what she had done & refused to speak w/out a lawyer. Her Miranda rights were denied first by now having advised her before hand, they set her up. Typical LA cops! Reminds me of Mark Fuhrman, they used every trick in the book to 'solve' crimes by setting up innocents. Had OJ not had fame & money, he'd went down the same path.

So much for having true friendships in the workplace, this was one huge betrayal.

Lmaooo I was about to comment something like that! 😂 💀

SuperQuail but since it’s such a big deal i’ll remove it for ya

Don't ever thank for likes. It's pathetic.

Don't ever thank for likes. It's pathetic.

LOL...gee willakers..yeh maybe..sheesh i dunno :)

LOL...gee willakers..yeh maybe..sheesh i dunno :)

Golly gee oh oh I don’t know it was just so long ago geez

Chris B i didn’t go through all 5 million comments and copy what someone said, legit just imagined karen spazarus saying it in the interview

“But I don’t wanna say three times cuz I’m just not really sure it was so long ago”

Joke was already made and has 22k likes rn

Joke was already made and has 22k likes rn

dominic brown hahaha maybe once or twice 🤦♂

dominic brown hahaha maybe once or twice 🤦♂


i'm wondering how they can question her without reading her her rights, maybe i missed a reason why they can do that in this case, or maybe they did and it didn't show it.


Just imagine all the men out there that would be absolutely thrilled with learning that their wife is going away forever for a murder they committed before they met.


They should have asked her if she thought John did it.  Just to see her reaction and what she said.


If anyone here is a Law and Order SVU fan, I just realized this is the inspiration for the "Secrets Exhumed" episode with Marcia Gay Harden as Dana Lewis. I had no idea and just came across this. The actress Marcia must've watched this interrogation over and over because the similarities are eerily perfect. She naked it. I've seen that episode so many times and didn't realize it was based on a true life scenario. I know a lot of there episodes are, justvdidnt know that one was. How crazy!


I think the scariest thing about this is that she got married and after 20 years her husband probably never knew she was a sociopathic murderer.... crazy how that can happen

@mandala 314 Well I mean, yes but by that time you'd likely have observed them doing such things to strangers constantly, possibly to your benefit.  If you live by the sword you die by the sword.

@bn880 and when they slip and finally show you, RUN as fast as you can. don't write off crazy behavior as the exception!

Not crazy at all, i mean most these murderers and criminals usually come off as normal and nice people before they are caught.

Like that never came up in conversation?

@ELFCloudGamer killing someone is NOT a stupid mistake. Driving after having a few too many drinks is a stupid mistake. Locking your keys in your car is a stupid mistake. Murdering someone is not s stupid mistake, something is wrong with her that made her think murdering someone would get her something she wanted.

@ELFCloudGamer the hell? She literally brutally murdered a woman

Because it was probably a stressful time in her life and she made a stupid mistake. You remove the stress and put a crazy person in a stable environment and they may thrive and never commit a crime again. You label someone a criminal and they will forever be a criminal.

@Jazzy AndCool if they KNEW then WHY were they in a relationship with her????

@That is just DOPE!!!!!!!! I think they are well aware :D

Look at her eyes.....how the hell do neither one of these guys know she's nuts?

@rachel l Exactly, there are hundreds of thousands of people married to sociopaths and psychopaths un-knowingly.   (some knowingly)

A lot of people wear rose colored glasses when in love, some a blindfold...

@Meldoesmakeup I mean she said "people think Im crazy", knowing how most marriages are I'm sure her husband wouldn't disagree

I was just thinking “damn what I would give to see what his reaction was”. Maybe he wasn’t surprised at all

@Michael Evans Probably. If she was able to get away with this for that long, I'm sure it made her feel invincible. Being a police officer and then being in charge of the investigation department (I think it said this at the beginning) probably fueled that feeling.


If a cop asks me what time of the day it is I respond with “I want to call my attorney “ 😂


Every time she says “what’s this all about?“ it’s oddly satisfying.


I like how John was like "...and the fact that Sherry's death occurred because she met and married me..." No, it occurred because you couldn't keep it in your pants. It takes two to tango. I'm in no way defending Stephanie's actions.


That exorcist bit at the end was too goddamn funny 😂😂😂


Detective: "Have you ever had a glass of water?"<br>Stephanie: "A glass of water? I... Geez, when? That doesn't sound very familiar.... water, water... I mean, maybe, it's possible, but what year was this? I had a glass of orange juice back in 86, but I can't even think back then"

Detective: "Have you ever had a glass of water?"
Stephanie: "A glass of water? I... Geez, when? That doesn't sound very familiar.... water, water... I mean, maybe, it's possible, but what year was this? I had a glass of orange juice back in 86, but I can't even think back then"

@Jemima Samaha I’m happy for making you laugh!!

I mean i mean i a million years ago i drank coke i mean i mean i was i you know i was saying

@The Truth She doesn't say exactly this lol they're spoofing off her general answer style

Lol which part of the video does she say this at? I missed it

I mAAy have had one at SOMEpoint, I mean, it's been a million years

Geez! that comment made me laugh! when were you born again? 93? 95 ? pfff can't even remember now

This comment is so precise I can't even add anything on it

hmm let’s see what was i drinking the year i graduated?


I like how they let her out for a minute just to be like "Psych! We were going to arrest you the whole time! Idiot!"


I found it interesting too that she was able to specifically remember the fact that his sister slept over at her house but not how long they've been dating for. That was a gotcha right there too tbh 😂


She’s a worse liar than 14 year old me after I stole beers from my dads home brew collection.


Cops: What color shirt were you wearing that day?

Stephanie: We can’t bust heads like we used to but we have our ways. One trick is to tell them stories that don’t go anywhere like the time I caught the ferry over to Shelbyville. I needed a new heel for my shoe, so I decided to go to Morganville which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So, I tied an onion to my belt which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel. And in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on ‘em. ‘Give me five bees for a quarter,’ you’d say. Now, where were we? Oh, yeah! The important thing was that I had an onion on my belt which was the style at the time. They didn’t have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones....


JCS: “you never know how you’ll react when being interrogated”<br>Person being interrogated after watching JCS: “Lawyer”

JCS: “you never know how you’ll react when being interrogated”
Person being interrogated after watching JCS: “Lawyer”

@1 1 I know, right? How do we not have miranda rights in Canada?

Suspect: “is this an interrogation?”
Detectives: “gosh, well… gee, I dunno. We wanted to ask you some questions but gee, that was a million years ago.”
Suspect: “lawyer.”

"Sorry this is Canada. I'm going to keep talking to you."

@TIV67 Playz stop commenting this everywhere

That's exactly what I thought....well after this... I'd be straight saying "lawyer" on repeat lol
Detective "You hungry Mr. Kawf? Need a snack or some soda?"
"Um... lawyer actually"
Detective "we're just trying to see if you might be thirsty or maybe a restroom break"..

"Oh ok well..lawyer"

@lynda fleenor
Well I think a lot of times they have to sit back into the interrogation room after talking to their lawyer on the phone.
Also almost all these cases on this guys channel are murders of intrigue. They're not the typical crimes. So I imagine the suspects who commit these crimes are already not of sound mind and body if they're yanking people lol.
I think the only thing they can't lie is what they're charging you with or if they can keep you there but everything is fair game to them. And they're already assume you're guilty.

@lynda fleenor  I said the same thing above. She is still arrogant enough to think she can talk her way out of it. She should have asked for an attorney or to leave, since she wasn't under arrest, as soon as they started asking her about that guy. Suspicion be damned. What is actually happening is that she just got locked into saying she didn't really know the victim, had never been around her and had never been to her house. So now, there is no plausible explanation for why your DNA is on her. The only reason is that you killed her and you tried to lie to cover your tracks.

As a police officer, allow me to say that is EXACTLY what people should say, because it's what I would say.  There is really no upside to talking to us, we're simply going to use psychological tactics against you.  If there is enough evidence, then you'll be arrested, and if not, then you walk out.  Make us work for it, damnit, because it makes us better in the end.  Also, the simple fact of the matter is that every US Citizen has the right to not incriminate themselves pursuant to the Bill of Rights.  It would behoove everyone to know that and use it.

@TIV67 Playz People have been saying the ends times are imminent since Revelation was written 1800 years ago. Get over yourself. If your religion is good and your god loving then you shouldn't have to use fear to find followers.

This, and watching the interrogations on The Wire.

@Beeble Booble thanks for sharing this information

Facts! Almost as soon as the subject of the videos starts talking I'm like "dumbass! You said way too much without invoking your rights!"

I'm not the criminal type in anyway but in hearing the things my "friends" and coworkers might get into, I have learned that cops lie (and are allowed to do as much to get a confession, regardless of the seriousness of the charge), some WILL ABSOLUTELY try to violate the rights you have that they expect you to not know, and it is best to ask for counsel as soon as the opportunity arises because of these things (even if it is something as minor as a fender bender out drinks traffic stop).


As someone who has to think a moment before answering pretty much <b>any</b> question, I feel like analyzing the length of pauses and things like that really should be taken with a larger grain of salt...

As someone who has to think a moment before answering pretty much *any* question, I feel like analyzing the length of pauses and things like that really should be taken with a larger grain of salt...


How could the murder not be the only thing you think about forever?<br>Is it like ‘oh it was just that one time I lost control, whoopsie I won’t do that again’ or ‘that’s what you get when mess with me’ or do you freak out because you didn’t know you were capable of it? How is it not always on your mind in bed ever night?

How could the murder not be the only thing you think about forever?
Is it like ‘oh it was just that one time I lost control, whoopsie I won’t do that again’ or ‘that’s what you get when mess with me’ or do you freak out because you didn’t know you were capable of it? How is it not always on your mind in bed ever night?


We forget Sherri in all this, poor woman thank God she bit her when she was dying, God bless Sherri 🙏🙏🙏💕💕💕🙏🙏🙏💕💕💕🙏🙏🙏💕💕💕


Her face is priceless, she's scared shitless and it's so satisfying to watch 😂😂


Seeing her pretend not to remember people's names is actually causing me physical pain

Freaky Boo yes ...by stupidity...i should know better...😘

its just horrible isnt it.  imagine having that deed weighing on you.

exactly, i had to look away most of the video, her fake over-exaggerated expressions(donald trump too) are obvious sociopath behaviour

@Raul De Leon "her name might be Shelley....Or Sherri...."

Girl stop. You know that poor lady's name. Lol


So what I got from part of this was.... she was born in 60  Plus the day that her and Scott met divided by the day that her and scott got married, minus the fact that His sister slept at her house, multiplied by the fact that she slept at his house. equals she doesn't remember How long they Dated.


Did anyone notice that she never once asked if John was hurt or in any kind of trouble ??


🤔This announcer is suggesting that on the third of three questions she’s in a state of actual reflection where is in the first two questions she was not but the third question is where she worked or what she did for a living and she clearly knew that she was a nurse because she had a major confrontation at her job while she was at the hospital


Damn came back to watch for the second time and so much of the video is deleted. It’s so disappointed, this was a great interrogation.


They did a really good job keeping her there without her wanting a lawyer.

They did a really good job keeping her there without her wanting a lawyer.

@Jeff Horsager Either way she's going to jail.  The DNA was enough to make a conviction.

@Jeff Horsager Either way she's going to jail.  The DNA was enough to make a conviction.

Once they brought up the name Rutten she could have lawyered up. 20+ years on the job - she knew the drill. No other reason for bringing up his name.

@Lilly Camille She gotta ask for one not say I'm thinking....

@Lilly Camille She gotta ask for one not say I'm thinking....

@Jeff Horsager You never been there lol 😂

@Jeff Horsager You never been there lol 😂

@mooky Because! I don't THINK they could elicit a false confession from me, but I wouldn't take the chance. I don't trust some of these police departments.

@jawohl mein führer y’all do know that invoking the 5th can’t be used as evidence of suspicion in a case right? she should’ve asked for one the minute she saw she was in an interrogation room

@Carbon Compounds People tend to think asking for a lawyer makes them look more guilty, i think he was hoping she could get through this "casual chat" as anyone who isnt guilty would

I'm thinking of putting solar panels on the roof and buying an EV. At no point there did I say the next thing I was doing was asking a solar panel installer to come to the house, or go to a dealership and tell them I was going to leave with a new electric vehicle.

Say I want a lawyer and I plead fifth. Then if they continue to ask you questions say am I free to go if not show to my cell.

Say I want a lawyer and I plead fifth. Then if they continue to ask you questions say am I free to go if not show to my cell.

@Andrew Korvin this case was 23 years old also. Who knows what a lawyer could come up with for her defense. But when she talked she implicated herself a lot.

@Andrew Korvin plead the fifth and lawyer up. Tell them to bring their case to trial. By her talking the prosecution case is much much stronger.  This interrogation sealed her fate.

Yes.  But asking for a lawyer would be seen as an admission of guilt.  She's in a tough place.  But she put herself there.  Lying is hard too.. especially with people trained to detect lies  :)

@zgSHADOW This is a total interrogation. Grilled, defensive, lies, repeats, long stories..,.total interrogation.

@zgSHADOW This is a total interrogation. Grilled, defensive, lies, repeats, long stories..,.total interrogation.

They already had enough evidence to. Arrest her no matter what, they had a DNA match she wasn’t gonna get a bond.

They already had enough evidence to. Arrest her no matter what, they had a DNA match she wasn’t gonna get a bond.

@j db No matter how innocent you are, always lawyer up.

@j db No matter how innocent you are, always lawyer up.

@Carbon Compounds hahaha well of course she should have
There's literally not a single scenario where talking to the cops is good for you, if you're guilty and especially if you're innocent
You lawyer up immediately in every situation hahaha
But here they were definitely being coy though and she thought she could just assuage their suspicions and not look guilty

She didn't want to arise suspicion.. A murderer that didn't want to arise suspicion by not lawyering up and not pleading the 5th. Don't talk to cops right? lol.. She had no idea she was being ambushed..

No they didn’t. They were supposed to read her rights first.

No they didn’t. They were supposed to read her rights first.

@c0nc3ntr8d no it doesn't, it immediately makes you look smart

@c0nc3ntr8d no it doesn't, it immediately makes you look smart

Asking for a lawyer immediately makes you look guilty even though it’s definitely your best option.

Asking for a lawyer immediately makes you look guilty even though it’s definitely your best option.

@j db that's not how that works, asking for an attorney isn't legally an admission of anything and can never be used against you

@j db that's not how that works, asking for an attorney isn't legally an admission of anything and can never be used against you

@j db the fact you are being interrogated by anyone is enough to ask because you risk bring incriminated

@j db the fact you are being interrogated by anyone is enough to ask because you risk bring incriminated

She knew her asking for a lawyer would imply her guilt

She knew her asking for a lawyer would imply her guilt

It’s because she was so used to cops sweeping it under the rug, she never expected the detectives that worked right by her man to finally put her away behind bars. She really thought she was never gonna be caught, you can tell by how off guard she was…..great job to the detectives who put true justice over their coworker 👏 👏 👏

@Jordan Dowland That's the kicker! She was allowed to retire with her FULL pension! How??? This woman worked in IA for goodness sake. How?? She worked alone as a beat cop many times and was able to use work time as personal time consistently.  She was also messing with someone else's husband! She was a superhead type with her eyes on a specific man all while "dealing" with others.

My heart bleeds for Sherri's family, friends, co-workers and specifically the nursing field. She was born to change the field and was taken out for nothing!

Damn if two Hispanic men would have gone to prison for this, it would never ended up in cold case. The case would've been closed. I can't even imagine being a family member of Sherri's OR Stephanie.

Damnit to hell.

@Lilly Camille Who cares? they told her she could leave whenever she wanted to , they were going to arrest her with the evidence they had no matter what ....the lawyer would not have been able to do a thing BUT negate all of this LOVELY VIDEO for all of us to look at

@Jeff Horsager 100% agree. Also your words sound exactly like they would talk in a JCS video. Are you a writer for this channel or have you just watched too much of it? Love it !!

@Lilly Camille if you start your sentence with "I think .." it will be determined in court that you were pondering the idea and didn't outright request it. A formality in normal conversations but a major difference once brought in a court of law

I haven't got there yet, but if that true then omg face Palm... she's a detective wtf

I haven't got there yet, but if that true then omg face Palm... she's a detective wtf

I have a question.<br>I know that asking for a laywer/invoking the 5th is NOT evidence in a court case, but in this scenario, could it be, as she was never actually stopped by police/arrested/detained. Could it be the same as something as entrapment, where the police arent really disclosing everything? Thanks if anyone knows

I have a question.
I know that asking for a laywer/invoking the 5th is NOT evidence in a court case, but in this scenario, could it be, as she was never actually stopped by police/arrested/detained. Could it be the same as something as entrapment, where the police arent really disclosing everything? Thanks if anyone knows

That is what I never understand about these videos. How can these people not demand legal counsel immediately?

That is what I never understand about these videos. How can these people not demand legal counsel immediately?

Honestly i give her more credit than that, i reckon she knew exactly why she was there as soon as the questions started rolling in, she did not buy their story of 'just going through old cases' imo

But anything she would have done might have drawn suspicion

@Lilly Camille no because she said “now I’m thinking I probably need to talk to a lawyer” she never asked for one nor ask if she could get one

I’m honestly surprised she stayed that long, they were asking specific questions that related to HER relationship to the guy and his wife and the questions were really specific. She seemed to have caught on once or twice but just kept going for some reason!

If she immediately lawyered up, it would have looked guilty as hell. She probably thought she might lose her job as a cop, since they wouldn’t want to retain someone who was suspected of murder - it could destroy her credibility on any new or past cases. Also, she was probably just 5 years shy of her pension and getting fired so close to getting that would have been a big motivator.

@FUGAZI Brothers if I remember correctly, she bit the lady during the scuffle, bite mark couldn't be predicted exactly when they were made as healing in those cases is exponential rather than  uniform.

@Carbon Compounds the bite was clearly left after the death. A coroner fight might be that maybe it happened right before the death, not right after, but it wouldn't change the fact that the person who bite the forearm was present during the shooting

@FUGAZI Brothers I mean they don't need to say anything about her death.

@FUGAZI Brothers I mean they don't need to say anything about her death.

@Carbon Compounds yeh, and that would coincidentally have been right after two Latinos had killed her, but geez, shit happens

@Carbon Compounds yeh, and that would coincidentally have been right after two Latinos had killed her, but geez, shit happens

the moment she wants a lawyer/leave the room, she is considered guilty. they never said who killed the victim was

the moment she wants a lawyer/leave the room, she is considered guilty. they never said who killed the victim was

@Megan Kearns will yes but she still would have a chance of getting out, I mean lawyers can save you regardless what you had said earlier like in the case of Kaylee.

@Carbon Compounds The DNA match was enough probable cause for her arrest. A lawyer would probably argue exactly as you say, but he'd be doing it with her in jail.

@Jeff Horsager  Yes she should have. Innocent or guilty,  people want to be helpful or appear to be helpful. It is surprising, or use to be surprising to me, when people in the business continue to talk. She knows they know something early in the chat but doesn’t stop talking.

I think even without her testimony (and her testimony doesn't even have a "gotcha" appeal to it), they have DNA and eye witness accounts of her confrontation at the hospital. Also her logs show she was around the area at the time of the killing.

@Lilly CamilleI personally would have been a bit more direct about it and stopped talking.

@Lilly CamilleI personally would have been a bit more direct about it and stopped talking.

@Megan Kearns you really underestimate the lawyer, it was not difficult to get out even if they had her dna on the women, the lawyer would claim rightfully that bite marks don't mean murder, it could easily mean they got in a hand to hand fight in which she bit her.

@mooky they can raise suspicions about her being the killer, the suspicions don't mean anything in court.

@mooky they can raise suspicions about her being the killer, the suspicions don't mean anything in court.

@Carbon Compounds Easier said than done my friend. You never know what your going to do until you're in there. I mean why lawyer up if you feel you're innocent right🤷♂

@C. They had sufficient evidence to arrest and charge her, even if she had immediately asked for a lawyer. I think she knew that right outside the door was a cop with a set of handcuffs for her. She was trying to stall and hoping to talk her way out of the situation.

She didn't want to ask for a lawyer because she wanted to keep up a pretence of not having any idea that they were accusing her of anything, if she had asked for a lawyer that could have been seen as an admission that she understood they were going to be accusing her of murder and she wanted to avoid appearing to have any knowledge that the questioning would eventually take that turn. That's what I imagine her thinking was anyway.

@Jeff Horsager well they had the DNA too remember.  I don’t know if she would have gotten off but she could have had more time before getting arrested.

That's the point and why they didn't answer what this was all about.

That's the point and why they didn't answer what this was all about.

She should have called the lawyer the minute they started asking about sherry, saying that I believe it's better if this goes through official channel.


00:50

I can only imagine that she felt like she got "Gut Punched", which was immediately replaced by a deep, dark, cold spot in the pit of her stomach that got bigger and colder by the second. Until it filled her torso from the nape of the neck, down to her naval to be sure.

I wonder how many years it was with her lookin' over her shoulder, going into work as an Officer and wondering if today is the day I get pinched?
Called in to the office for a new pair of bracelets, instead of a "Well Done", that she was now used to getting, yeah instead she got a couple or three stunned and seemingly revulsed colleagues hooking ya' up.

Maybe she started to relax after a decade...or two. Man, she's getting pretty close as the years go by, retirement is in sight...

I bet in some weird way, SHE felt cheated. Felt like she somehow, earned her way to a peaceful "Golden Handshake", with no...complications. Even though she took a life to get there. In my mind she WAS cheated but in reality, it was her who cheated herself by what she did and the price that, she'd thankfully, end up paying. Mostly she cheated that young lady of a chance to live her life. All the family and friends that were deprived of watching and being a part of it all.
Tragic.

Well they, all of them, the ones close to the talented young Rasmussen lady were the ones cheated...all the while Lazarus  goes on to live the lie of the life of an innocent woman.
Until they caught her...thank God. 🇨🇦


Oh my gosh why are you possibly asking me about a guy I dated where I stalked his new wife and confronted her at work and then killed her in a jealous rage.  My gosh, that is crazy guys it was so long ago.


10:35 "whats this all about" shouldn't be so hard to say, she knows she's in trouble by GUILT


Problem with this psychology is that innocent people who feel guilty simply because of the questioning will show the same traits.


She was just like

“There isn’t enough evidence here”
bites corpse

She was just like

“There isn’t enough evidence here”
*bites corpse*

man....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

man....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@Dawi From Another Hold I believe he was being facetious

@Dawi From Another Hold I believe he was being facetious

@al north smart and inteligent ones dont go to prison

@al north smart and inteligent ones dont go to prison

@al north a lot of serial killers have pretty high iq

@al north a lot of serial killers have pretty high iq

@Serge Fabre chill. They’re not geniuses, you’ve just put them on a pedestal in your head.

@al north it's actually this way of thinking that allowed many serial killers to walk free lol

@Purple Sun yeah but that's very inaccurate on the face of it. A novice lawyer can get that thrown out.

@ItsNot SoBad — Explain: “gone from our societies soon.” Thank you.

@al north watch Dexter then come bake and say that

@al north watch Dexter then come bake and say that

<b>"whatsa...whatsa...wha,wha,wha....well whats this all about !!??"</b> LOL

*"whatsa...whatsa...wha,wha,wha....well whats this all about !!??"* LOL

@hellohowareyou yep. Chris Watts is a sociopath & no one's calling him a genius 😂😂 most criminals only think they're intelligent. That's their narcissism.

Bundy was no different. He drove his own car around, trolled for victims in the same areas & used his real name. Dude also turned down a court appointed lawyer.

I thought maybe she wanted to make it look savage

I thought maybe she wanted to make it look savage

@Serge Fabre oh absolutely no worries! just wanted to throw that comment out there

@Ahlex I wrote that comment a long time ago and my opinions have since changed

@Serge Fabre the genius psycopaths and sociopaths dont kill lmao they prefer to hurt people in ways that they know will get away with.

@Jumanah Idris Yeah its a western thing to believe people by default. <br>That'll be gone from our societies soon.

@Jumanah Idris Yeah its a western thing to believe people by default.
That'll be gone from our societies soon.

@RayTheGay  you are correct ,Ted Bundy  represented himself , as far as the bite mark , they definitely could have used that in conjunction with the rest of the evidence which was clearly dismissed if even considered at all . They knew who did this but covered it up for political reasons and what i mean is ,<br>“ if this gets out it looks bad for everyone of us and the department “ i wonder if they even interviewed her back when this happened that would be interesting to see .

@RayTheGay  you are correct ,Ted Bundy  represented himself , as far as the bite mark , they definitely could have used that in conjunction with the rest of the evidence which was clearly dismissed if even considered at all . They knew who did this but covered it up for political reasons and what i mean is ,
“ if this gets out it looks bad for everyone of us and the department “ i wonder if they even interviewed her back when this happened that would be interesting to see .

she forgot that she had bitten her .. well 😂

she forgot that she had bitten her .. well 😂

I know why would u do that she was already dead lol smh

I know why would u do that she was already dead lol smh

The fact that she was bitten and brutally beaten even after she was already dead from gunshot wounds suggests a crime of passion... someone who likely knew the victim and was acting on strong emotion, not a burglar who needed to silence a witness. When its family or a partner they tend to conceal the body, even if just with a blanket. If the motive is sexual there's usually a kidnapping and/or signs of rape. Circumstances alone should have pointed to a romantic rival if the detectives were paying attention. I think they were thrown off by the red herring of another home invasion that had happened in the area, which was probably just a coincidence that worked in Ms Lazarus' favor since apparently they never even considered another suspect.

Yeah beating a lifeless body and biting it after....u definitely got some issues, esp over a relationship

Foiled by corpse biting......(shakes head)

Foiled by corpse biting......(shakes head)

@Dawi From Another Hold Of course bite mark technology were well established in the '80s (and long  before that). We're not talking about the stone age here.

@al north That's not true. You got cold cases for which there wasn't any murderer found. Some of them were not caught till the end of their lives. Just like in any field or job area, you got stupid and smart people and that also applies to murderers, even if we think that murdering someone is stupid and foolish, some people murdered someone else because of reasons that were logical to them.

@al north You could identify a suspect through dental marks, but you also need sonething to match it against. The bite marks didn't match the husband and they had no other leads, she wasn't the suspect.

@RayTheGay its fresh tho so its not weird

@RayTheGay its fresh tho so its not weird

@Seiphert you don't need to have any idea about dna to do a bite mark analysis

Back then they didn't have any idea about DNA.

Back then they didn't have any idea about DNA.

Bite mark analysis has been around for ages

Bite mark analysis has been around for ages

@Serge Fabre No, psychopaths and sociopaths are not "geniuses." Maybe they're geniuses at manipulating people, but they are in no way necessarily more intelligent.

@Serge Fabre they really aren't. The only reason pathological liars get away with it for so long is because we simply believe people by default, and assume good faith by default

@David R absolutely *not*. It takes a special kind of psychotic to even entertain the idea of biting a corpse, let alone doing it

@al north psychopaths and sociopaths are geniuses  (although most of them don't do crimes but can away with crime more often)

For real, like, WHY was that part necessary XD

For real, like, WHY was that part necessary XD

@Dawi From Another Hold yeah but the second that she learned that forensic science was in existence she should have known this day was coming as a police officer and staying in the times as a police officer she should have known better

D B I know now a days it’s really stupid and easy to fuck up. But back before DNA they had to try to do whatever they could to get a conviction. And if I’m not mistaken I’m pretty sure Bundy represented himself

RayTheGay Bite mark evidence is a joke, they used it to convict Bundy, but it’s useless as a technique, bruises don’t mimic the thing they were created by well enough, Bundy’s lawyer was useless if he couldn’t get that thrown out completely.

The bite could be used to highlight an episode of temporary insanity. She clearly was, at least a little crazy at the time.

David Vaughan I think most people don’t want to bite corpeses

@Dawi From Another Hold Im pretty sure  there was technology back then where they could Identify a perpetrator through  dental examination, but Im wondering if this woman didn't somehow influence the investigation since she was already in the police force back then

I don't think murderers are very smart or intelligent, if they had any smarts they wouldn't be murderers

Yeah don't act like you wouldn't've done exactly the same thing in pre-DNA times

Dawi From Another Hold there was but it wasn’t used often. Bite mark analysis was used to put Ted Bundy away, I assume it wasn’t applied here because she wasn’t a suspect.

But when she did it there was no technology to reliably trace her by the bite marks, right? So she wasn't thinking that this could get her in trouble, thus she could go feral. And also, she probably wasn't thinking at all if she decided to bite it in the first place.


She remembers everything else except the answers she needs to give!!


All she had to do was answer their questions honestly. Instead she pretends not to remember things, she surely should have remembered.


How can they use this in court without reading her rights??


She’s in shock!! 😱🤦🏼♀ These are our police!! I’m in shock- -not-/god help us all


She must have been a real asset to the Police force with that razor sharp memory. I mean geez!

Imagine her on the witness stand?

Defense attorney: you arrested my client 6 months ago, do you remember that?

Stephanie: Er..ahhhh...that was a million years ago....ummmm I mean ..maybe?

You can't judge her performance as police officer from her performance under this intense pressure though. She's fighting for her life here.

She's clearly lying, pretending not to remember important information as if it wasn't notable to make her appear innocent. I'm sure she thought, if I tell them I can't remember her name then they'll clearly think I'm innocent.

Figures, most departments have people like this working to "protect" the public

@ladweeb I know. I was being sarcastic Ladweeb...Duh!

Duh!  She is pretending not to remember to get out of the situation.  That is what suspects do to avoid going to jail.

I-i-i am geez gosh. Man. Im not sure. This isnt ringing a bell. Gosh. I started writing this a million years ago. Darn. Gosh. Geez.

The Police will hire anyone. There's no real standard.

lana lake that’s awesome.  There’s only 6 people worldwide that are known to have it.  It’s fascinating.

But she has 10,000 photos to remind her remember??!  😂😆

Anna KW ikr, I remember my elementary school crush’s phone number from about 25 years ago 😂  gosh jeez I just can’t remember if I murdered someone or not

@D B It is only recorded for authenticity and the lack of mind comes from secrecy alone.

No actually thinking like a psychopath can go a long way and nobody would disagree with that!<br>Anyway...  justice must strike all.

No actually thinking like a psychopath can go a long way and nobody would disagree with that!
Anyway...  justice must strike all.

@lana lake Thanks for this. I got onto this last night an needless to say I've had about three hours sleep ha ha ha. Best Wishes.

Not to defend her, but being a police officer (particularly after 25 years in the service) can be quite cognitively taxing. It’s why most everything on the job has to be recorded. Lol but yes you’d think murdering someone would stay quite fresh in ones memory.

they didnt let her check her pictures or ask Shameeda

Oh she remembers. I remember people I dated 20 years ago and I never even killed anyone's wife.

She must of been a great u.c. for stolen/counterfeit art. Genius undercover cop with 100% success rate

Right? And with verbal skills stunted at about a 9 yo. - for sure.  "I mean, you know, gawd, gee, like, I mean.....".


I really hope the full length version of this video can be restored one day, there's a lot of content that has been cut 😟

Entire version is on the Trials and Tribulations channel. No comments and no narrator.


I actually believe her when she said: I'm in shock!


I'm shocked that after 20 years I finally get caught.


Does anybody else remember this video not starting off with the explanation clip of the cops? I swear he showed a photo of Stephanie when she was a cop in a previous upload where it was 45 minutes 😖


Her expressions look like she discovered fire every 5 seconds.

What a touch at the end. Funny then chilling.

@CrazyMiles you're right. Ignore the haters.

@Dave she said those words every 5 seconds

You... you have made a joke ive never would have thought of, youre great

42 minutes and it finally clicked for her

Still watching 30 minutes in and she still hasn't figured out why these guys keep asking about her ex and his wife.

Reminds me of those videos of video games where the facial animations are turned up 500%.

Best comment ever, lmao! This is so true; a perfect way to describe her outlandish OVER-reactions. I will say, she’s certainly entertaining to watch. Most have the personality of a door knob.

that’s gotta be one of the funniest comments i’ve ever read 😂😂😂

Klassiek my man, Yuit made my day hhahahahahH.

Congrats on the comment bro not a single negative response!

Dude, I'm stealing this, lmfao.😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😃😃😃😃😅😅😅

GOSH! GEE! GOLLY! 🔥  1982...84...92...I STOPPED TEACHING D.A.R.E....


Odd that the detectives were permitted to interrogate their own colleague...


She's like a 4 year old trying to lie to an adult.


I watched the whole interview and I don't see her being any different than anyone else being questioned when they were guilty.  She was a little loopy acting, but not anymore so than anyone else acting innocent when they arent.


I like how she can remember what floor of the dorm she lived on but not the age of her husband

@Alicja K Its because people's age changes every year, the floor you live(d) doesn't change every year. Lol

Shes still obsessed with John and stalked and knows every single thing about his life.

That actually makes perfect sense to me. People's minds work in different ways.

I don't know my parents' age but I remember the weight of wrestlers from the WWF attitude era.

It takes me a while to remember my own age but I can still remember my locker combination from 8th grade

Edit: 10 12 32

@james charcoal yeah, also, how often you have to state date of birth of your partner -all forms, picking up prescriptions from pharmacy, booking doctors, buying airplane tickets, celebrating birthdays every year? Even if you suck at dates, you would say “his 62nd (or whatever) birthday is coming this year”

@nightlockerzI think they’re just saying, if you marry someone, aren’t you gonna remember their age instead of your dorm number from a long time ago?

@Alicja K It's her husband, Alicja. Lol.

Yeah, well... To be fair - I'm terrobly bad with remembering ages of people too (including myself), while floors, phone numbers, etc. are easy xD


She lives w this for 26 years-probably thought about it everyday only to get caught .she would have been better off getting caught when it happened-she would have been out by now and had it behind her


Its crazy to think that 40 % of murders go unsolved. There are killers amongst us.


Imagine finding out your wife had murdered someone before you dated.


Kinda ironic that her name is Lazarus and her case was raised from the dead

That would have made a great title for this video! The Resurrection of the Lazarus Case

In mathematics coincidence doesn’t exist. This was her destiny. It’s over and done. She wrote her own story.

This is the best thing I have read this year.

Completely un-ironic (because Lazarus is a fitting name in that case) but I get what you’re saying lol

Oh well done my friend! Excellent comment!

Wrong use of ironic, but good reference to the lazarus pit

The universe has a beautiful sense of humor


There was an episode of Law & OrderSVU like this. The killer woman was an FBI agent and she had killed her ex-bfs fiancé back in college than became an FBI agent,


These videos are so fascinating for the non verbal analysis! And she makes nice Rich Piana faces.


She would have gotten away with it had she not bit her.


I am by no means a body reading expert, but oh man. She flopping around was tantamount to being guilty, or at least an accessory of this murder…


It’s almost cringe to watch people squirm and try to lie around what they’ve done.

Really cringeworthy I had to hide my face

Carrie Ferguson Or like Obama,Hillary and Bill????

I'd drop the "almost" part. This is painful to watch.

especially back in the 80’s with the way most people spoke, with the “oh geez” shit, makes it 100x more cringe

@Michael Ronga true, when people are lying they tend to do that

I can’t relate more to a guilty murder😂 I’m the most guilty looking person ever, even with things I didn’t do

@Michael Ronga she should have just shut her trap. Then she would have gotten away with it.

Almost?? I’ve been experiencing second hand embarrassment for a solid 20 mins now 😖

When they’re guilty it’s very entertaining


No one’s talking about the interviewer, who did a very good job


Take a shot whenever she says "um"

Goodbye, hope the hospital bill doesn't kill you


The very end of this video is absolute gold


Give her a break, who here can remember something that happened a million years ago??


The best is when she is already making a face, then the cops hit her with another question so she makes a face on top of the face and looks incredibly crazy

Her face looks like the tragedy mask and the comedy mask are fighting it out for dominance of her face.

@Rob Thompson no ones laughing at Sherri getting shot, we're laughing at looney Lazarus' weird facial expressions.

Im dying with the faces she is making...🤣

@Rob Thompson it would hurt but not for long

:| idk, i just don't know
asks another question
°_° idk...

:| idk, i just don't know
*asks another question*
°_° idk...

I think we can tell the parts you're talking about. I'm still laughing 🤣

@Tempo Drift The saddest part of this whole thing is, while John was giving his victim-impact statement, ol' Crazy-Eyes was sitting there thinking to herself, "Once I'm paroled for brutally murdering his wife, I'll win him back. You watch."

@Terrell Moses OH MY GOD. as I was reading the comments, that part came on as soon as I read your comment 😮😱😂😂😂😂

That's like when Mel Blanc does Bugs Bunny impersonating Daffy, trying to fool <br>Fud Whacker.

That's like when Mel Blanc does Bugs Bunny impersonating Daffy, trying to fool
Fud Whacker.

Perfect description of what was happening. <br>I wanted to go with the theory of her inner demon taking over her consciousness once that car was mentioned. 😆

Perfect description of what was happening.
I wanted to go with the theory of her inner demon taking over her consciousness once that car was mentioned. 😆


So how many people did her ass frame during her career?<br>What an injustice that this took 25 years to look at the crazy person with a motive.

So how many people did her ass frame during her career?
What an injustice that this took 25 years to look at the crazy person with a motive.


Steph was pretty nervous and "uncomfortable" for someone who didn't do nothing 😂

Edit: I could live without the jumpscare at the end, thanks very much 😒


Just goes to show. Even cops think they will outsmart interrogators.  Like she knows that asking for a lawyer is the best case scenario. But she actually thought she was gonna be able to walk free after 70 minutes of horrible acting lol


Imagine this: You got away with a crime, got away with it for 24 years, carefully studied and practiced police interrogation techniques and developed a reputation among your fellow officers, only to have your crime get exposed and solved in a DAY, and only because it was the literal equivalent of "Slow news day" for open cases Lol.....All because you tried to take a bite out of crime :>


So she’s arrested / brought back in at 1:10:30, moments after she walked out? Yeah lady, you’re done.

And her sentence seemed too light to me. For so many reasons.


She was shocked because she thought she’d got away with murder. 👀


Why...WHY was the first several minutes of this video edited out? It included the entire set up about her background as well as the crime and crime scene photos, etc. It's a real shame that they were removed, for whatever reason.

@RotanCam oh sorry! terms of service. so the content was probably seen as “graphic/violent”

YouTube has super strict TOS and it violated it, so it had to be cut up to fit within the TOS- pretty sure it wasn’t really up to Jim :(


I don't understand why these people never shut up and ask for a lawyer. You'd think a cop would know better


Note to self : If I'm ever asked questions about a crime I'm hiding, I'll enter a true state of reflection by trying to remember last night's dinner. Good luck catching me, detectives.

@anđela she wanted to know what death tastes like.

"Did you know the victim's name?"

"Curry"

But then your responses will be suspicious

@servant_of_god exactly. Kinda makes me wonder if she was trying to maybe tear that arm off, or worse

@Tom oh geez.. i mean... i don't even remember, it was a million years ago.

@Saksham fr who bites someone after they dead💀

If Stephanie's Dna was not there on the crime scene she would've never been caught. It's funny how her stupidity of biting the dead body caused her arrest after 25 years.

@Cassandra would they be suspicious when I ask for tweezers tho?

@Cassandra from experience, ass hair works 10 times better in generating tears.

If you need to cry to seem grief-stricken, pulling a nose hair usually works


Take a shot every time she says: "you know", "a million years ago", "I mean" and "I don't know what else to tell you".

You are now VERY drunk. Drink some damn water and lie down.


21:07 (Time stamp 1pm 08min 20sec) All right, Stephanie. Take care.
21:15 (Time stamp 1pm 08min 50sec) You're under arrest for the murder...

She lived in the delusion that this was going to 'go away' for a full 30 seconds. 🤣🤣🤣


"Did you murder somebody back in 1985?" "Phht. That's been like a million years ago. I would say no!"


I’m sorry but her faces make me laugh every time I watch this… as another commenter said she really does make every single facial expression possible and they aren’t synchronized. Goodness gracious this woman gives me secondhand cringe. Bruce Rivers should do a video on her lol


“We possibly have DNA evidence from the scene”<br>“That’s great!” as her life literally flashes before her eyes. Lmao classic.

“We possibly have DNA evidence from the scene”
“That’s great!” as her life literally flashes before her eyes. Lmao classic.

She was probably thinking....NO way l destroyed all the evidence WTF are they talking about.?!!!!

@Tiffany Swensen thanks for the reminder, helpful in case I feel like wanting to bite a corpse....

She was sure she had destroyed all the evidence and messed up the murder book .  One swab in bottom of coroner's freezer ....life sentence.

@Der Stoff aus dem der Joghurt ist Dieser NAME! XD

🤣Thats exactly what i thought!🤓
Wait!!
Dave Chapelle:  “Gotcha bitch!”

@Tiffany Swensen Yep. Bundy learned that the hard way too.

I think the most important takeaway here is don't bite your victim.

@Der Stoff aus dem der Joghurt ist 45:10


As soon as the officer changed the subject from art to her ex she should have asked for a lawyer, which was in the first few minutes lol


Currently reading the Lazurus Files — great book!


She’s not a sociopath. A sociopath wouldn’t have killed for love.


You would think that since she’s a cop she would know how to read the room💀✋🏻


"Did you know this person?"
"awe gee idk"
proceedes to tell their entire lifestory

"Did you know this person?"
"awe gee idk"
*proceedes to tell their entire lifestory*

Correction: proceeds to tell her entire life story <i>AGAIN</i>

Correction: proceeds to tell her entire life story _AGAIN_

@yooo l yeah we have a fat 10 month course or some bullshit, that’s one of thee main reasons we have so many terrible people in the force

@Art Queen ikr like “Oh Golly good show, oh whipper snapper, Oh you meddling Cops 👮♀ 👮♂ 👮if it wasn’t for you! I would have gotten away!” Like some scoobydoo

"...then I had coffee and came in to work to have this conversation with you, but I really don't remember"

this shows me, thats easy to be a police officer in usa..here in germany its rly hard, they only take the best and u have tgo to college for 4 years

Hey, thanks for that. Can you recap the whole thing for us?

SHE IS SO ANNOYING she’s a terrible liar the hand movements and the sheer amount of times she says “you know golly I don’t know”


Stephanie: What's this all about?<br>Detectives: This is about something you never thought about. It's called KARMA!

Stephanie: What's this all about?
Detectives: This is about something you never thought about. It's called KARMA!

Brilliant, so glad it caught up with her.


"Maybe" "l may have" "You think I would" <br>She won't admit but doesn't want to get caught lying either. Smh

"Maybe" "l may have" "You think I would"
She won't admit but doesn't want to get caught lying either. Smh


THOSE CLIPS AT THE VERY END OF YOUR VIDEOS, I AM DYING she looks like a clown, i would have laughed my ass off if this wasnt such a serious matter...she deserved what she got


Detective: “Did you know John Ruetten?”<br>Sherri: “Four score and seven years ago…”

Detective: “Did you know John Ruetten?”
Sherri: “Four score and seven years ago…”


She didn’t even end up with the guy. She killed her literally over nothing it’s very sad. Then she ends up being a cop for 25+ years…

@Dean doesn't mean you're a psycho just cause you stabbed someone, you may of had good reason. A friend of mine was attacked in a sexual way (sorry I can't make myself even type the r word) she stabbed him as soon as she got the chance, she worked her way up to management in children's homes, she absolutely was not a psycho. Sometimes there really is a good enough reason to hurt another human being. I don't know why but I feel like u had good reason Dean. Forgive yourself

@lydia espiritu Because they didn't know she was a murderer? Duh?

@AU He has depression and is doing crack last I heard. Even contacted him under false pretenses to "apologise" and harassed him about it again. Oh how the tables have turned. I'm doing fine now and his life is a pit of despair and misery. I only hope he is alive so he can continue to suffer. :)

@AU And I hope the world ends tomorrow, but we don't always get what we want.

@Lattamonsteri It's always great to see the Wheels of Justice turn. I imagine it brings closure, which is as close as you can get to getting them back I imagine and that isn't close at all.

@ENCRacingTeam ye i went to read about it in wikipedia and lazarus had reported that her firearm was stolen which is suspicious but the gun was never recovered so the gun (even though it was a .38 gun like the murder weapon) couldn't be used as evidence. :P i was just surprised that they still had some dna samples from way back in the 80s but lucky for the victim's family, that dna sample lead to justice being served. Even if it doesn't bring the victim back :(

@Dean If your posts are being removed it’s probably because your reasoning behind stabbing someone, wasn’t a good reason.

@Lattamonsteri He left out some details. She staged a robbery, there was a clear struggle in the home, however from what we know from robberies they are not very personal. So considering someone took the time to beat this person after they were dead, then bite them and leave the goods is questionable. Also, I belive there was some evidence regarding the firearm, I belive it was her duty weapon but don't quote me on that piece cause it's been awhile since I watched whatever documentary was on this case. It was pretty solid and DNA was the nail in the coffin.

@Count_Zer0 Literally my third attempt at posting that, I'm not sure if someone shadow blocked me or what.

@AU Don't tell me what to do, and I'm a psycho oh well

@Dean tell me whats a good reason for that. If you convince me ill bake you a cake

So.. If she did end up with him... Would it have been.. ok?

@lydia espiritu a mental breakdown serious enough to be on record is obviously reason for concern. Sorry for whatever you went through but they did the correct decision.

@lydia espiritu probably an indication that you are much more capable of dealing with your issues than the subject of this video

@Lattamonsteri They could have compared the bite mark to dental records and the saliva on the bite matched her dna

@Lattamonsteri DNA is pretty conclusive, even after a very long time. It was probably a mix of the DNA and how weird she acted in the questioning.

Hearing her say she made detective just a few years after she pulled off the murder sent something right through me.

@Lattamonsteri they probably scraped off the skin cells and such off the bite Mark's and had them sitting in a sealed bag for 20 years. But yes, the DNA was still present

@Squirt Reynolds and those bite marks still had dna in them after 20+ years :0

@Lattamonsteri they got her saliva off of a coffee cup and matched it to the DNA that was on the bite marks

jo Brown Smith she couldn’t remember the year she met her husband. Sounds like she wasn’t too fussed about her actual husband but decided to ‘settle’ because she’d given up on her obsession with Rutten.

@Lattamonsteri
I think they said at the start that her dna was the only one found.
As she was a detective, that was not weird at the time and got ignored until some years later they found out about the fight between the two woman before the murder and trief to subtle question her. During which she lies a lot and denies that massive fight from even happening.

I missed what the conclusive evidence was. Was it the DNA? Was the sample collected in 86? Still sounds sketchy. Did she happen to confess? Isn't that a bit sketchy too? <br>I mean it's a sad story yes, but the video feels incomplete even with the video clip from the trial :(

I missed what the conclusive evidence was. Was it the DNA? Was the sample collected in 86? Still sounds sketchy. Did she happen to confess? Isn't that a bit sketchy too?
I mean it's a sad story yes, but the video feels incomplete even with the video clip from the trial :(

@lydia espiritu additionally, she was already on the force when she killed the wife.

@lydia espiritu it happened because yours was a documented case that they could see. It's not like they had a file on her saying "yup shes a murderer, but she'll make a damn good art detective"

@lydia espiritu That's messed up... You were a kid!

He did sleep with her, somewhat, after his wife's death. He never cared enough to ever marry her. I think she finally gave up on him and married someone else.