21:33
When she sits back down, handcuffed behind her back, she is complete and total shock lol.... and I'm talking about the clinical, real meaning of a "shock" state.... The way she keeps shaking her head in disbelief, it's because of that shock state.... I've experienced real "shock" a couple of times, but NOT with anything involving the law or crimes lol!! At that moment, when she sits back down, everything around her feels completely unreal and dreamlike.... She's undoubtedly a little dizzy and/or lightheaded, movement may generate "tracers", but the absolute best analogy is the dream/nightmare. It truly does feel as though you're in one of those extremely vivid nightmares. You guys know the kind. They have you absolutely convinced that they are real.... but even that isn't the right way to explain it.

It's more like, they are so real, it doesn't even occur to you that it may not be. So it's not that you're "convinced" your nightmare is real, you don't even question it to begin with, as far as you're concerned you're already awake, so that's the least of your worries, all you're focused on is the subject of your nightmare. HOWEVER, at some point during your nightmare, it DOES occur to that it MIGHT not be real, it MIGHT be a dream, so you concentrate as hard as you can on waking yourself up, and BAM!! You sit up straight in bed, and this massive wave of relief just washes over you, in fact, you're practically euphoric, and you're soooo grateful for reality at that very moment.... and now that you actually DO know that what you're experiencing is real, you wonder how you could have ever believed your nightmare was real, as the clarity you now feel, is so much better than the clarity you THOUGHT you had during your nightmare. I don't know, it's hard to explain lol!! Words cannot really do the experience justice, but most of you have experienced what I'm trying too hard to describe lol.

Anyway, as Stephanie sits down in that stuffy little interrogation room for the second time that day, she repeatedly shakes her head back and forth and displays this look of extreme confusion on her face. She's behaving this way because she's experiencing that exact same nightmare vividness, and everything around her feels like, and appears to be, a dream, or rather, a nightmare. But unlike her past nightmares, she can't wake herself up from this one, and she's forced to acknowledge that it's real. But she's also in a state of shock, so this whole process will probably repeat itself quite a few times, until she finally adjusts to her new world on the other side of those bars she's been putting people behind her entire adult life.

Anyway, my bad writing so much, and on such a boring topic lol.... my bad peeps. I find certain things fascinating, and I tend to bore everyone else with those things haha.... but the good news is the vast majority of peeps won't dare read a novel this long in the comment section!! And I don't blame them!! Over and out yo.... :))


People saying they can arrest her based on just DNA alone. While that is true, if they did arrest her on DNA, she would've known she's a prime suspect for the case and would've definitely requested for legal counsel since she has many years of experience in the PD. Catching her off guard like this made the process a whole lot easier.


For a cop, she fell into the trap easily


She was in panic mode the moment they mentioned her ex boyfriends name.


She should be a politician, she's able to talk alot and not make a single point

Recovering addict here - I was incarcerated with Stephanie 2015-2017 at the California institution for women- and it was BEYOND To get out and find out why she was in. She was an oddball but she acted like a sweet motherly woman!!! I thought she was one of those moms who got a DUI till I got out and heard a podcast about her.

She's already being held where most politicians should be.

The saying is... a politician talks alot without saying much at all...

Most of them are sociopaths too, so I think the comparison is apt.

This is what it would be like to interview Chael Sonnen.

And she can almost get away with murder!

She makes the same facial expressions as trump and has the same energy as Kamala

@nouri nouri keep seeing that name popping up in other comments section. Checking out Jodi after this. She sounds like a lot of fun lol.

She said shes moromon...heard they make great politicians 🤣🤣

she could be like: "what difference does it make?"

Politicians are psychopaths and sociopaths, so she fits.

Берков Константин

According to Wikipedia, her major was political science :)

you should see the video on Jodi's Wrath then

doesn't that say more about politicians being sociopaths than her


She had 20+ years to come up with a story and this was the best she could do ⁉

Gee.. gosh! I mean shes really bad in lying you know?

@Alexpert2 lol noo, i’m saying if i were in her shoes then i would feel too much guilt and therefore keep the lie written down and firmly in my head just incase.

@zoefinch ur saying you think about how to lie about the people you killed?

Maybe I'm just a paranoid person because if it were me in that position I would never forget my story bc you can never be certain you won't get caught like this lady did.

Yeah I could "move on" with my life but I would never let my guard down.
This woman was just dumb 🤷♀

I see where you're coming from, but it's kind of hard for me to say that or agree because she didn't think she'd ever get caught

Maybe she thought she would never be caught 🤷🏻♀

Maybe she thought she would never be caught 🤷🏻♀

She very clearly thought she got away with it

She very clearly thought she got away with it

@Randy James there’s always a you in the comments 😒

A pretty good reason was given at the start of the video, being in the actual situation where you would constantly have to think 100 things in a second and adept to every lie you tell. You bassicly just cant, even if you planned it all out. This woman even knew the tactics and still she fucked up

She worked in the investigating department, she could have “lost” the file

She must have thought she got away with it 🤣

She must have thought she got away with it 🤣

Probably thought after a year or two that she’s never getting caught

Guys, can’t you remember? She can’t remember what she did 20+years ago, so how could she come up with a story

@arthschopy she was a leading scientist in the field pf dna she must have known that what break throughs in dna evidence would have happened

@cat snake  i always thought it was weird that she was considered a prime suspect, but then got passed by for two random Latinos. The fact that she was the real culprit makes the Latino part really gross in hindsight. That’s where I believe people started thinking about the white privilege part in her case.

After 20 years you shouldn’t  need a story you should just be able to dismiss it

She got too comfortable after getting away with after so long

For the first few years Im sure she had a story but then she probably thought she was in the clear after a few years and forgot her careful fall back plan after 20 years.

20 years has a way of nurturing complacency.

20 years has a way of nurturing complacency.

After watching the first 5 minutes, it's clear she wasnt the brightest tool in the shed. They had her in an interrogation room and brought up the guy she murdered, how did she not figure out where this was headed? lol

She could've at least taken acting classes in that time.

It really wouldn’t of mattered what story she came up with because of the way her DNA ended up on the victim. Best bet she would of had after her crime would of been leaving the country a little while later and adopting a new identity. But I’m glad she wasn’t that smart and stuck around to get what was coming to her.

@cat snake a lot of innocent people were probably  convicted in the days before DNA analysis as well

She got too comfortable & was almost certain she was in the clear this many years down the road. DNA evidence really hadn’t taken off then to the extent as it has now that it’s widely known that many cold cases are being solved via DNA evidence alone.

I mean she prob thought she covered her tracks

I mean she prob thought she covered her tracks

@Randy James what does any of that have to do with her race?

@Randy James how TF did you bring race into this?

@zoefinch I don't think that Lazarus ever thought she'd be caught. Her arrogance caused her to not think of a lie.

@emrefifty Apparently she wasn't familiar with DNA smh

@HereIsWisdom 1318 I would have nightmares every night if I murdered someone, but that's the difference between a plain person and a murderer I guess.

@MontcomHorror Agreed!  Hence my previous post.

@MontcomHorror Agreed!  Hence my previous post.

Enough time had passed to where she was no longer prepared.

To be fair, the murder was over 20 yrs ago; Stephanie prolly had a story, but after 10 years, thought she was scott-free, so just forgot about it.

@zoefinch ‘maybe that’s how easy guilt gets to me’ bro ur talking about murder lmao

emrefifty since Dna get better and better, she should have change her strategy for this day.

@emrefifty tbh i would still have it just incase, but maybe that’s just how easily guilt gets to me

She was never confronted about it, she really thought she got away with it.


Surreal to think that throughout this entire interrogation, she must have re-played killing Sherri over and over in her head multiple times.

@Joe Arnold yaaa tbh I would do that too

@Fiona Draws yea, did you not watch the video?

｡*♡ 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓭𝔂 ♡*｡

@Fiona Draws yup. It’s in the autopsy. That’s at least one of the places they got her dna from, which is poetic justice, I think.

@Joe Arnold LMAOO. she did it cause she was jealous?? Or something else?

Implementing this comment as I watch the video is chilling


Dude I don’t know what it is but it’s so hard to watch these videos. Not in the sense that they’re bad; they’re incredible. But The second hand embarrassment I get from those interviews is unreal. I physically cringe when they dig themselves deeper into the hole of lies.

@Minerva Minavera as someone who studies psychology, it’s so easy to tell that he was full of bs. Dude’s performance was 0/10.

@Grace Watson it’s funny the cop railing on the kid

@Uncle Debbie u don't have to kill someone to be a psychopath.. it's just easier if u are

@ja Hil I didn’t find her cringey. I found her somewhat fascinating in that I’ve never seen anyone pathologically lie so much before. If we’re talking about what this commenter said in getting secondhand embarrassment from the subject, to me, anyone who pretends to be ill or something they’re not in an attempt to misguide police (horribly by the way) is incredibly embarrassing to watch. Jodi was herself she’s just a liar like all of the other murderers or criminals on this channel.

@Moselle Conger the cringiest one is definitely Jodi I mean come on the "crazy kid" was cringe but my god jodi, i had to pause that video so often till i could finish it.

@Uncle Debbie I'm wondering if you can educate me on this, though I don't want to assume you know everything on the topic. From what I have learned, a sociopath implies that you were not born this way, while a psychopath was born that way and is void of emotion from the start, as well as the possibility of ever learning true emotion. A person becomes a sociopath through trauma, though trauma can cause several different avenues that don't cause anything close to being a sociopath. A person who's trauma does lead down a sociopathic path learns that by essentially voiding oneself from emotion protects you from more pain. Trauma doesn't always cause this, and it also heavily matters how deep that trauma is for the individual and how long it lasted. The tragic thing about this is how difficult it is for a sociopath to reverse this defense mechanism. The reaction runs so deep in our subconscious, it makes it extremely hard to fix, even years after the pain is over. Sufferers sometimes want to bad to reverse it they inflict pain on themselves (or others) just so they can feel something. Severe types of trauma can also lead to sorta mania on top of a sociopathic state of mind, and I think THIS is what separates sociopathic killers between regular sociopaths. Sociopath doesn't mean you will commit murder, but a true fully-progressed sociopath is void of the ability to feel remorse. This is where it gets tricky I would think. Do you have any insight or opinions on this, if you don't mind me asking? I've just never talked to someone who suffers with this and I'm curious!

@Stephen Sullivan lol I used ro when I was younger...

I was about to comment the same thing, I feel like I'm sitting in that chair and they're asking me all those questions lmao, shit is so nerve racking lol

Same here - I have to pause a lot and skip a little here and there, but I can't stop watching!

That's SO me too. I watch these videos and find myself feeling horrible at the end, like in a trance.

totally agree, the most extreme one I've seen so far is Jodi Arias... I was physically reacting a few times, especially when she was presenting the shirt she designed at the end of the video.

I actually think this woman is one of the best liars ever featured on this channel.

The reason she didn’t succeed is because they already had incriminating information on her and knew she was lying the whole time. She didn’t know she was playing a rigged game the whole time.

This is how she got away with murder for 20 years and became as successful as she was. Like the thumbnail says, she’s a narcissist or a sociopath. She’s fuckin good.

They help you become a better person. When you compare yourself to evil, the similarities are alarming enough to incite change. They also help you become a better liar😂

Bruh same my chest goes dark mode when i see these videos

You’re definitely on point. Especially when we all know what the outcome is. To watch them squirm .... not sure cringe is the word is use but I can’t think of a word at the point in time. 😉

Right. I have to pause the vid for a few moments just to recover from the cringe.

@Jimbo Juice no, it’s beyond the feeling of cringe

@Grace Watson That’s the toughest one to get through yet! Such a good quality and interesting video but the cringe is on another level.

If you think this is cringe, I highly recommend the video on this channel about pretending to be crazy lol.

Same i cant put my finger on it but something just urks me so much about the vids but im addicted i think its just how bad they are at lying and how passive the detectives have to be id just want to full on confront them if i were the detectives lol

SAME!!! I love these types of videos, and interrogations of sociopaths and criminals but the way they lie and pretend to be innocent is so embarrassing. I cringe hard.

thought it was just me i have to skip so much hahaha

Dude and the way she talks 😭😭 Its so hard to watch when she's constantly stuttering and saying "I mean"

YES!! I completely agree! these are so interesting but soooo hard to watch

Makes me cover my face with hands.  Just thinking of telling lie makes me so uneasy.

I get second hand embarrassed alot thinks I could never put it into words.

Omg Jodi Arias!! Watching her was like watching myself lie, when I was 7.


this was painful to watch. she is so unbelievably annoying and a terrible liar. i mean cmon, 20+ years to come up with a good alibi and this is what you got?

@TymP321 true but she had no chance either way

@tinajack444 True...agreed with that. She didn't think and never thought she'd be in this position.

What do you expect her to say?? "I never knew John Rutten or his wife!?!?" LOL!!

She would have been confident she wouldn't have anything come back to her about it. And with no recent prior warning it would've been a massive shock suddenly realising what's going on

The DNA match alone was enough to get her, and her relationship with John Rutten. Those two, no doubt

You'd be surprised how little evidence can get someone arrested, and how much can be ignored ahem Casey Anthony.

@Shenaniganiser all the bases covered that were available at that time, she never anticipated technology and science.

αɴαнαтα love

Which is weird.<br>Didn't she work in the police for years? You'd think they would know how to act and how not to act.

Which is weird.
Didn't she work in the police for years? You'd think they would know how to act and how not to act.

It wouldn't have mattered whatever she said.<br>The found her DNA

It wouldn't have mattered whatever she said.
The found her DNA

@charutha Look into videos on the Russel Williams case. A lot more stoic and way less insecurity in his "armor".

@αɴαнαтα love but the pressure and how many years it has been I mean she probably already feel safe for many years and then all the sudden she got call in an interrogation where she know she have committed a crime that can cost her reputation, prison for many years and the disappointment of ur family how can you handle that pressure all of a sudden

@ScotchTowerBibleTractSociety Nailed it, that's exactly the vibe she's giving!

and you are focusing on the deal that she made a bad alibi 😅. Its annoying enough that she got away with it.

the equivalent of saying “idk idk idk i cant remember”

good point. 20 years. I would think she could just be calm, but no, she can't help it because it is all about lying and the "fight" mode is on.

You'd think she would have a very, very, very well rehearsed story. First off - admit the dispute. It's witnessed. Doesn't mean you're the axe murderer. She is, of course, but don't lie about what you don't need to

She thought she had all the bases covered. She was a cop after all.

@Monique Mosley   Probably, but that’s a very foolish thing to do (well, to begin with, don’t kill people, so you don’t end up in a JCS video). She’s (still on this video) a cop, she knows the case was archived but that evidence and dna samples were stored because the identification by dna was on its first steps when the crime was committed.
She also knew that she was at least mentioned by the victim’s father as a potential suspect, and that also stays archived. And lastly, she had a relationship with the victim’s husband. If I were her and didn’t have a conscience, I would have thought of an alibi from day 1 that included dates, places, and I would have also rehearsed like crazy in case I had to face an interrogation, so I don’t end up saying “it’s been so many years” every two seconds like if I was the old lady from Titanic.
This was a high profile case, I would have expected that someday law enforcement would have been knocking on my door just because of the stored dna samples alone, doesn’t matter if I’m a cop or not. She’s a sociopath and a narcissist, so she probably thought she could outsmart everyone forever. But she didn’t take into account that, apparently, she’s not that bright for that. She’s not the female version of the Zodiac killer or something.
Well, she was screwed anyway, besides being a terrible liar, it’s your word against a dna testing. I’m glad she was this foolish, though. Being a cop and all, and she performed worse here than many others that have nothing to do with law enforcement. A really dumb and despicable woman.

Monique Mosley Exactly, 23 years after murdering someone and not getting caught. you probably figure that you’re in the clear.

@αɴαнαтα love Even if you know how to act and are well prepared. But if you are guilty and you get put on the spot, it really is psychologically tough to hide any tells.

She never expected to get caught. That's why she didn't have a good cover lie.

You couldn't have nailed it any better!!!

She's straight up channeling William H. Macy in Fargo for the entire interview

doing more research about this case, the police department kinda ignored all information about her being a potential suspect, i think she was feeling pretty confident for a long time that she was somehow 'protected'.  and she's a horrible liar.  besides someone who actually suffers from memory issues, she didn't remember a LOT.  which proved right away how evasive she was being about what she knew.  she could have sat there and said 'i don't remember' or instead of not remembering obvious events she could have said 'i remember it but i don't think it happened that way'  or 'i think his wife was worried about me being with him and made me look bad to her friends and family, but i never threatened her, i think she exaggerated.'  i mean seriously!  don't play completely stupid!!!

αɴαнαтα love

propably because
a) she is nervous and caught off guard
b) its been 20 years and she didnt think she would still need one


She had over twenty years to come up with a story, and all she could come up with is the golly gee willickers defense?

Golly gee willikers batman they have me sorrounded

@UpdateDotExe Well shoot you must know me then

This type of woman is notorious for this behavior...you know what I’m talking about. Nothing new.... 😒

@UpdateDotExe damn you got out of jail just to make a dumb comment, Mrs. Lazarus?

this case is so horrible and so tragic. this comment made me forget all of that for a second and just start cackling

Hey that's not fair. She also came up with this face 37:18

@McCammalot "she is terrible at psychopathing" had me dead lmao 🤣

In her defense man that was like a million years ago

@NOLA GIRL but that is what I'm saying, mama mia!

@STOP SAYING 'GUYS' she is the worst psychopath ever. SHE IS TERRIBLE at psychopathing 😂

She's confident bcs she, as a police officer may have blamed it on the two guys on the start of the vid, confident that the pointing hamds would lead to them...bcs.. 'men' and she as a police officer can manipulate their background/ files on the death of the victim

Psychopaths are always the smartest people in the room,  it wouldn't occur to her that she need one.

@kent davis Take yer time, you have ALL ETERNITY to think about it... Or at least, 27 years? I mean gee ya know God, Jesus, and Saint Mary! >:  D

that defence worked in Andy Griffith's Mayberry. Probably still works in cities where suspect is wealthy &/or  powerful...Justice is blind when she chooses to be.

Just imagine living 20+ years having a more or less normal life, but always having that one thing back in your mind that could theoretically fuck your life up any day...

Well they caught her off guard and she likely thought she would get away with it.

gee gosh i mean - eh - er i mean that was- with- i mean - ahh- i mean

For a somewhat serious answer: she probably thought, after so much time had passed, she was in the clear and had no reason to come up with a reasonable story/alibi. Perhaps she came up with something to use right after the murder happened, but over time, as the heat died down, she felt no need to store that made up information and just forgot it. And she certainly wasn’t given any time to think up the story again to sound even somewhat coherent.

well after 2 decades of getting away with it you feel safe and don't bother. Then suddenly two cops mention it so in her head it's just 'fuck fuck shitfuck fuck'

Well, I'm trying to think 😬😳😑😖, gosh,  I mean yeah, maybe she that is all she could come up with, but it was a million years ago

She obviously thought she would never get caught. She felt safe after over two decades being overlooked.

Right! And she was a cop too so you’d imagine she’d know enough of the little tricks to allow her to spin a solid alibi.


This is why, kids, we don't commit crimes because eventually you will get caught and worst of all, you will be mocked by the internet

@King White Knight Correction, check <b>any</b> good sized river in any large city and there are going to be bodies, to be sure!

@King White Knight Correction, check *any* good sized river in any large city and there are going to be bodies, to be sure!

@Purple Plantain Presumably she did it out of pure hatred and jealously so no that's just karma

idk, all she had to do was not bite the girl’s arm and she would’ve been homefree. You can certainly get away with a crime; unfortunately?

This channel's comment sections are such a weird slice of human psychology.  Like we're all watching videos that have to do with horrific crimes and our first instinct is to laugh at how the suspects act.

i mean, id say "why we don't commit murder" because many different things are technically "crimes" but not all are this level of fucked up...

@Zen _ .... are you alright, that was obviously a joke

Its true, getting mocked in the internet is worse than burning in hell

Ur right to not commit crimes because that's just not a good thing to do, but some of these people make it so damn easy to catch them just by their mannerisms and the way they act. Especially this woman, and she's a cop...


I think this woman made more facial expressions in this one interrogation, than I have in my entire life.

Maybe because her life was about to completely change hahaha


It's 2022, but I still remember the guy I dated in college back in the 90s, our timeline, and everything about him. Give me a break, lady!


I'm sure if she had said 'this is crazy' just a couple of more times the cops would have let her off.

”sigh… she’s probably right, we’re just being crazy… let her go Dick”


I wish you could see her face when they asked her if she knew him? We missed that with the camera angle.


I find this story so sad but then you go and finish the clip with the most hilarious ending ever , tears in my eyes laughing at James Woods saying f*** this


Wow! At the end, she looks as crazy as Aileen Wournos did meeting the press on the day prior to her execution.


The final reaction in the video really scared me 😂

Él mëhDï Öüböühöüčh


When Sherri's husband reads all Sherri's good qualities, they must feel like daggers in Stephanie's heart as she shares none of those qualities.


Imagine the faces that crazy goon was making as she violently and repeatedly stabbed at her victim.

She didn’t stab Sherri. She bit her, shot her 3 times and beat her with a vase. Many of her wounds were post mortem and you’re right. One can imagine her expressions as she pummeled a woman she just killed. Total psychotic.


“I been doing this a long time! For- gosh- over a million years!”


Am I remembering wrong, or was there more to this video before? I'm pretty sure an introduction to this case was cut out

@sasuke’s bussy Well that is BS for sure. Why taken down? There are thousands of vids far longer that his and no content was inappropriate. 🤷♂🤷🤷♀

@767 Driver YouTube took his vids down so he had to cut them for YouTube to let them back up

You remember correct. It has been chopped, no explanation given.


I wish it was still the full length video 😞


Pro tip:  google her name and click images.  Look at her eyes. Yikes.  Scary stuff.


Appropriate that her last name is Lazarus, because upon hearing this I could die and be brought back to life years later and she'd STILL be going on about her life 🙄


she made the scariest facial expressions i have ever seen. i'd like to see her when she's angry. perhaps not, on second thought: it may cause a heart attack.


This never gets old. I keep coming back. lol


she reminds me so much of my mom, I low-key want her to get away with it. I really want her to lol (first third of the video as of now)


If I hear her say "I know how this stuff works" one more time I'm throwing something


😩💨💨💨😩💨💨😩💨💨

She. Is. So. Painfully. Unnatural.

Literally the most bizarre human being.


I wonder how many times she says one million years ago. I love you videos by the way. i watch all the time and constently re watch.


so the integrators were lying? because at the end of it they arrested her even though the whole time they said she was never


Her scoffing and “gosh!” “Gee!”’s drives me up the freaking wall lol


She refuses to say she never visited her ex and his new wife at their home because she knows they have dna of her there.


How can you fall for the very strategy you were trained with.


is it just me or is there a lot missing from this video? came back to rewatch but I could have sworn there was more :(

Wait really I watched this a long time ago too and I remember it being a lot longer than 23 mins

SO much is missing! Like huge amounts have gone... :(


It's a shame that you guys had to shave so much information from the original video


Legend has it Stephanie is still wondering what everything is all about


It's really fascinating. Because of her training she knows what NOT to do, but she can't figure out in the interview what TO do. I swear I can see her scanning her memory like "what am I not supposed to say again?". Wow.

@SiisKolkytEuroo Yes they can be bad guys too! Bad apples in every bunch.

@sponish0 I know it's a typo here, but I'm fairly certain she did "shit up" about a minute in.

Even more "impressive", is all his BS @ 6:43, when any other "suspect" would immediately get spooked that he rambled without answering her question in the slightest...She asked no less than 3 times "What is this about...?", and they deflected the question 3 times...She wasn't very smart!

@Arminius Music gee wiz...err that was err... gosh darn err...funny comment

Exactly, anything but the truth.  There’s too many psychopaths in this world.

She totally panicked and forgot all that Academy and Post training. Then she just vomits irrelevant information. I like the way the Detectives presented their question slowly and methodically.

Hard to keep track of lies but saw a study that showed liars have great neural connection.

@Dungeon Master few, which makes this specific situation much more heroic to me. That was my original original point.

They caught her off guard and off balance...training goes out the window at that point.

Yep!!! She’s so nervous and scared she can’t think!

@John Doe The focus on this interview is not the law itself. But how she answered her questions. Her body language. The tone of her voice, the choice of her words at specific times.  All those have been documented and part of law enforcement training on what to look and hear for when interrogating any possible suspect.  She was thinking only what NOT to say.. instead of what she should say

yeah but I don't see how she incriminated towards the law in this interview ?

This is an excellent observation.  Knowing what NOT to do is not going to be a "how to get away with it" manual.

she seemed angry because of all the time that passed. i suspect in her mind she earned the right to get away with a murder and was fine living with it.

@Kake this is a better idea the more I think about it...

I'd love to see two detectives attempt to interrogate each other, both being told the other is a murder suspect.

It's funny how everybody is like "Oh look at this minute detail that exposes her!". Dude. They started talking about her ex and his wife as if the wife was alive for like an hour and she never went "Oh yeah, didn't she die though?" but then when they asked her she immediately knew. If somebody started talking to me about an old friend I knew was dead as if they were still alive, I would've immediately questioned things.

@Arminius Music 🤣 first degree felonious facial expressions

@SiisKolkytEuroo the vast majority, in my experience and observation, are heroic souls or at least good folk. When they are bad, they can be very bad and be able to operate longer. Please don't be so reductive. ✌

@Nice Material to her defense, she did… eventually… say she needed a lawyer (much too late)… but she’s a criminal for those faces she’s made. She needs to go away forever.

Gosh! Golly! Gee!… what was it?… I need a… shoot darn… hmm… I need a… golly… hmm… darn shoot.

@SiisKolkytEuroo Sometimes they are. Sometimes these interrogation techniques put innocent people away. I don't think he meant that they are usually bad guys, the same way you don't mean that they are always good.

@Nice Material so you believe cops are usually the bad guys or wtf?

@sponish0 yeah it's quite a dance, and some great strategy from law enforcement. I love when the cops are the good guys.

They caught her off guard cause they never stayed it’s an official interrogation or she’s an official suspect, had they done so she would of known to shit up and ask for a lawyer. But she thought this was just a regular meeting so her mind working overdrive like “hang on they think I did it or they are just asking me general questions should o ask for a lawyer? That’ll make me look super guilty if I ask for one when they are not when accusing me of anything


She totally resembles Charles Manson at the end with the facial expressions. Some of his interviews were just like the faces she was making.


Has she been checked for dementia? She has some serious memory issues 🧐


It’s bizarre to me to come back to these videos and see how much was taken out of them. It’s ruining the narrative and makes the whole video weaker. Reminds me of Orson Welles’s remark about hysterical tinkering.


I think I saw this on TV. The employees she reported to cheered that she was gone.


I don't recall them ever reading her her rights, and past an hour and 5 minutes or so she mentions getting a lawyer. The investigatory interrogation should have stopped there!
Sad thing is the narrator is constantly trying to talk about what is going through this person's mind without them specifically having an interview with them and the interview is only as valid the time of the interview and there are a hundred different psychological states that someone may be at any given time.
Hour and 10 minutes before they finally advised her of her rights. That should have started from the outset.
This prosecution should never have been allowed to continue. Fruit of the poisoned tree. They would have had to assert that they had no clue whether or not she had anything to do with that murder when that interrogation began in order to get away with not advising her of her rights. When they knew of a surety that they suspected her! They failed the Miranda test.

Human behaviour is fascinating at times, but generally speaking, all of our bodies are held hostage to biochemical reactions forged through thousands of years. We can't help but to give off involuntary, sub conscious reactions when we are lying. Beautifully displayed here in these videos/confessions

They didn't have to read her her rights in the beginning. She was tricked into thinking she was helping them with an art theft case. Brilliantly pulled off and got this scum bag off the streets


In the spirit of 6 degrees of separation, someone who worked with someone that worked with her in San Francisco claimed her nickname was, what the co workers and other cops called her behind her back, Spazerus Lazarus


Did YouTube force JCS to remove half of this video?  The entire introduction is missing.  This is bullshit.

Oh thank god I was wondering if I was going crazy if you search for the video you can even see the original length of 56:06


Considering she's a police officer it's almost comical how bad she is at lying

It’s harder than you think. She was taken by surprise and also had probably thought she had long gotten away with this

@ニャサヒ the crime was before there was technology capable of tracking dna the way it is now.

@Valentinooo Bullshit. It took 20+ years because the detectives at the time shut down any lead that indicated that the murderer was one of them.

I do genuinely think being put on the spot didnt help her, so funny watching a liar lie tho

all she ever sees in her profession are bad liars so maybe it rubbed off on her.

@ニャサヒ when she murdered her, DNA wasn't a concern

you thought she would’ve learned something

It's because she is guilty and she knows they know something but she doesn't know what so she doesn't know what she can say without getting caught on a lie

@Luz Luccini tape lift still existed as early as the 50s, evidence was still collected and archived, and she should have known better being in the force. there isn't a statute on murder

Nyasahi Most killers back then most likely easily left their DNA behind because it wasn't something they had to worry about unlike now thanks to the advancement in DNA\forensics testing.

@ニャサヒ i mean during the time of the crime they didn’t really have the technology to process dna thats why it took 20+ years

@ニャサヒ DNA technology wasn’t available in 1986 but still

Well, like the narrator said, you never know how you will respond.

@N A They're the ones who do interrogations

Police officers shouldn’t be good liars.

everyone always thinks they can talk their way out of it.  even intelligent people make that mistake.

and how good she is at leaving behind her dna like wtf


All of the facial expression she makes is like `C'mon guys I'm a cop too just like you, do you really think I killed him? Gosh, how can you believe this, just let me go gee will you?`


The final 15 seconds of this video are both hilarious and terrifying.


The faces she's making at the end got me on the floor rolling


If this isn't proof enough that an innocent person should never talk to the cops, I don't think anyone can help you.   They'll make you guilty, even if you're not.  And not even one of their own can bluff their way out of an interrogation.  This is, as she said, what they do.  Even if you're innocent, you're not going to beat professional interrogators if they think you did it and want to prove it without having to charge you, first.


Imagine she would be a free person if she didn’t just bite the girl.

Imagine she would be a free person if she didn’t just bite the girl.

@JDC you can be a sociopath and not murder somebody...

@JDC you can be a sociopath and not murder somebody...

@a lucientes Sir, all due respect, you know absolutely nothing about me except I believe in A Supreme Creator, God, and His only Son, Jesus Christ, the Messiah, and the Savior of the World. I do not fear hell or the devil or even death because Christ conquered them for me. In fact, I fear nothing. I don’t fear not having food or clothing or shelter, because I live the abundant life provided to me by the Lord. I have total and complete peace and I love people and just try to be a blessing to others. I am certainly not perfect and have a dirty mouth sometimes and a sarcastic attitude sometimes. I am a work in progress. But, I tell you the truth, my life is the exact opposite of what you portray it to be! I have no pressure to perform or follow religion because Christ paid the price for me. I have a relationship, a deep friendship with the Son of God and it doesn’t get any better than that. If something bad happens, I can talk to Him about it and I live under the shelter of His mighty wings. Privacy? Not good enough? I have no idea what you are referring to. Are you projecting? I really am not sure. Except for this. I am a sinner, just like you. The difference is, my sins are forgiven because I am under the New Testament. (Covenant) I am warm, well-fed, and very happy, and have peace and joy in my heart every morning. God is so good! Unfortunately for YOU, you don’t know Him, and that’s a tragedy. You are missing out on EVERYTHING! And, when my eyes close to this world, I will slide right on into heaven. Don’t die before you figure this out! Please. It’s there for everyone. He did it for you, too. You don’t want to get this wrong! I am telling you the best I know how that you have completely missed the boat on this one! He found me when I was 29 years old and saved me. Best decision I ever made!

Just think of all the things that we have learned about in science and our world and man in the last hundred years! DNA, the way the brain works with our senses, doing literally hundreds of things at once for us to do things. Why, I guess DNA didn’t exist a hundred or even fifty years ago because you didn’t know about it.🤔 Sir, I know something that you may never know, as intelligent as you are, even. God is real, always has been and always will be, and Jesus Christ is His Son who also always was and always will be. No, I won’t debate you about the Old Testament but there are more learned people than I who could, although I doubt you would accept any of their answers, and that’s ok. I have a Covenant with the one true God who created the cosmos. He loved me (and you) enough to pay for my sins on that cross. He did that freely even though we sure as hell don’t deserve it. He asked for nothing in return from me except to acknowledge my belief in His Resurrection. And, I do believe, in fact, it’s way beyond belief, I know. I wish I could prove to you whatever you think you need proof for, but it would never be good enough. If you want to believe you evolved from some slime that came up out of the sea and grew a brain from there along with arms and legs and your senses and everything just magically worked together, that’s your prerogative. Or maybe you’re a monkey. But, I’m no monkey, and neither are you. You were wonderfully and intrinsically created by the God who made the universe and if I could give you one piece of advice, which I know you will reject, ask HIM what He wants you to know! Ask Him for wisdom. Why not try Jesus? If you don’t like Him, Satan will always take you back!

@Sandra Ressel It doesnt really matter so much what we think or believe, as much as what we can show is true bc there is enough evidence to support it. Plenty of people think theyre Napoleon. That doesnt ever make it so.  This is the difference between faith-based belief (or delusion) and empirically-derived, fact-based knowledge. Someone compared science to religion. They could not be more different. It is difficult to believe anyone who's read the bible can say it doesnt condone slavery. For starters, Jesus -if the bible is to be believed, says: Do not think that I have come to abolish the law [of Moses] or the Prophets. I have not come to abolish, but to fulfill it. Math. 5:17 It is explicitly tied to the Old testament (the first five books of which make up the Torah) because it began life as a messianic offshoot of Judaism. That's why Jesus is referred to as rabbi and his circumcision gets mentioned.  SO, all of what is in the Old Testament, Jesus condones, including genocide, the flood, taking sex slaves, the selling or killing of your children, and wife, etc. etc. If youve read the bible,, you know the monstrous atrocities it contains. I dont think you have, very much. Even the New Testament is full of commands that slaves obey their masters, that slavery is the will of God. For example:   Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but like slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart. Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving the Lord, not men, because you know that the Lord will reward everyone for whatever good he does, whether he is slave or free. Ephesians 6:5 * there are dozens of passages like this, and much worse. Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. Mathew 10:34 - This is the same guy who says turn the other cheek and Set a table for your enemies. -Concepts which long predate Christianity, but the point is the inconsistency. You can go on fulllengthaudiobooks . com for free  and look up Carrier's On The Historicity of Jesus and listen to the entire book for free..  It is very long and scholarly, but those are the facts as we know them and it it's a subject youre interested in.. that's a very cool thing to have for free. We can still keep the mystery and mysticism, engaging the mystery of our own beings, without the pretending to know things we dont, the sectarianism and all the dogma of religion. I think so anyway, even if the bible says otherwise. cheers.

@Sandra Ressel It doesnt really matter so much what we think or believe, as much as what we can show is true bc there is enough evidence to support it. Plenty of people think theyre Napoleon. That doesnt ever make it so.  This is the difference between faith-based belief (or delusion) and empirically-derived, fact-based knowledge. Someone compared science to religion. They could not be more different. It is difficult to believe anyone who's read the bible can say it doesnt condone slavery. For starters, Jesus -if the bible is to be believed, says: _Do not think that I have come to abolish the law [of Moses] or the Prophets. I have not come to abolish, but to fulfill it._ Math. 5:17 It is explicitly tied to the Old testament (the first five books of which make up the Torah) because it began life as a messianic offshoot of Judaism. That's why Jesus is referred to as _rabbi_ and his circumcision gets mentioned.  SO, all of what is in the Old Testament, Jesus condones, including genocide, the flood, taking sex slaves, the selling or killing of your children, and wife, etc. etc. If youve read the bible,, you know the monstrous atrocities it contains. I dont think you have, very much. Even the New Testament is full of commands that slaves obey their masters, that slavery is the will of God. For example:   _Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but like slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart. Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving the Lord, not men, because you know that the Lord will reward everyone for whatever good he does, whether he is slave or free._ Ephesians 6:5 * there are dozens of passages like this, and much worse. _Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword._ Mathew 10:34 - This is the same guy who says _turn the other cheek_ and _Set a table for your enemies._ -Concepts which long predate Christianity, but the point is the inconsistency. You can go on fulllengthaudiobooks . com for free  and look up Carrier's *_On The Historicity of Jesus_* and listen to the entire book for free..  It is very long and scholarly, but those are the facts as we know them and it it's a subject youre interested in.. that's a very cool thing to have for free. We can still keep the mystery and mysticism, engaging the mystery of our own beings, without the pretending to know things we dont, the sectarianism and all the dogma of religion. I think so anyway, even if the bible says otherwise. cheers.

@Jess Pavlichenko That’s your opinion. Jesus Christ was the Son of God, who came to free mankind from the chains that bound them. His people were the Jews, who were enslaved in Exodus. I don’t think for a second that Jesus Christ condones slavery of any kind. Do you know Him?

@Cristina Varona 2:15 It was inferential on my part, but I think considering that they have slept together in the past, I would be very surprised if they did not sleep together while dating again.

@ParadymShift, Plant-BASED Ⓥegan Jedi wait, from what I understood, they slept together after he got engaged to Rasmussen, not after her death. Unless, I misunderstood this..

@ParadymShift, Plant-BASED Ⓥegan Jedi wait, from what I understood, they slept together after he got engaged to Rasmussen, not after her death. Unless, I misunderstood this..

@a No, there is no evidence ASPD arises from trauma.

@a No, there is no evidence ASPD arises from trauma.

@Sandra Ressel no he meant slaves ovey your masters, the kind slavery described and condoned in exodus

@Sandra Ressel no he meant slaves ovey your masters, the kind slavery described and condoned in exodus

@Goatboi Most people who are sociopathic are actually exceptionally intelligent. Low functioning sociopaths end up in jail, high functioning sociopaths end up on executive boards. They're not stupid. Most know they are sociopaths but don't care

@Goatboi it isn't a choice to be born a sociopath. Seeking help and taking steps to prevent yourself from damaging other people is

@Goatboi it isn't a choice to be born a sociopath. Seeking help and taking steps to prevent yourself from damaging other people is

What I took out of this video:
Someone is lying if they keep saying:
“It just doesn’t sound familiar”
“Gee, it was a long time ago”
“I may have”

What I took out of this video:
Someone is lying if they keep saying:
“It just doesn’t sound familiar”
“Gee, it was a long time ago”
“I may have”

@Misty Montgomery tx. I actually know of Lee Strobel and his work. The problem is simple. If we are going to say God exists, then we need to explain where it came from. It's incoherent to say God just always existed, so it doesnt need an explanation -if that is the case, then why would the universe require a a creator? Something there is no evidence of, which would have to be far more complex than the universe it simply wills into existence and has omnipotence over.

There is also no good reason to think there was any historical person at the root of Christianity. Just start with the book The Jesus Puzzle by Earl Doherty, and see what you think.  The earliest writings we have are the 7 epistles of Paul (the other epistle attributed to him are later forgeries or pseudepigrapha) and in all of them Jesus is described as a purely revelatory figure

It looks like Paul took on some ideas from some existing non-Temple-conforming Hellenic Jewish savior cults focused on Yehoshua, -a figure from Jewish angelology. Paul's Jesus was a notional savior archetype, an Archangel who descended from the high heaven to allow himself to be sacrificed by the Powers and Principalities (daemons who ruled Earth from their thrones in the Firmament, the layer of sky between Earth and the seven Heavens) as an atonement sacrifice. The crucifixion of the archangel was held on Earth - not in the firmament; the Powers and Principalities ruled the Earth although they lived above it, somewhere in a notional lowest level of heaven. The crucifixion event had to be held on Earth to make its sacrificial blood magic efficacious as a channel for Salvation for Believers.

This sequence is described in detail in the Vision of Isaiah document, which is part of the Ascension of Isaiah document. An early version of this tale very likely existed in Paul's time, and that he was influenced by it. By conning the Powers and Principalities into crucifying him, Paul told his followers, the archangel Yehoshua opened a passage to perfection and redemption for human believers. If you Believe this claim, join the Pauline Church, and follow Paul's behavioral/moral instructions, Paul told his followers, you will become part of "the body of Christ" and "be saved." --

--To whomever wrote that The Gospel of Thomas was a later spurious text. That is simply incorrect. A number of the Christian gospels found in the Nag Hammadi library are contemporaneous with, or actually predate some of the gospels in the canon. Look it up.

They were left out for obvious reasons: they teach that a direct path to God is possible, and the Church of Rome was not having any of that. The bible as we know it was not compiled until the 5th century. And has had more revisions than all of the text contained within it. These are facts, not suppositions. Do some critical research and you will learn how scholars know what they do. The works of Bart Ehrman (even if he is wrong on historicity) are otherwise very good for critical analysis. You can also watch Mythvision Podcast on YT. It is critical but if youre a Christian you will learn tons of facts you didnt know before. cheers.

@Misty Montgomery tx. I actually know of Lee Strobel and his work. The problem is simple. If we are going to say God exists, then we need to explain where it came from. It's incoherent to say _God just always existed, so it doesnt need an explanation_ -if that is the case, then why would the universe require a a creator? Something there is no evidence of, which would have to be far more complex than the universe it simply wills into existence and has omnipotence over.

There is also no good reason to think there was any historical person at the root of Christianity. Just start with the book _The Jesus Puzzle_ by Earl Doherty, and see what you think.  The earliest writings we have are the 7 epistles of Paul (the other epistle attributed to him are later forgeries or pseudepigrapha) and in all of them Jesus is described as a purely revelatory figure

It looks like Paul took on some ideas from some existing non-Temple-conforming Hellenic Jewish savior cults focused on Yehoshua, -a figure from Jewish angelology. Paul's Jesus was a notional savior archetype, an Archangel who descended from the high heaven to allow himself to be sacrificed by the Powers and Principalities (daemons who ruled Earth from their thrones in the Firmament, the layer of sky between Earth and the seven Heavens) as an atonement sacrifice. The crucifixion of the archangel was held on Earth - not in the firmament; the Powers and Principalities *ruled the Earth* although they lived above it, somewhere in a notional lowest level of heaven. The crucifixion event had to be held on Earth to make its sacrificial blood magic efficacious as a channel for Salvation for Believers.

This sequence is described in detail in the Vision of Isaiah document, which is part of the Ascension of Isaiah document. An early version of this tale very likely existed in Paul's time, and that he was influenced by it. By conning the Powers and Principalities into crucifying him, Paul told his followers, the archangel Yehoshua opened a passage to perfection and redemption for human believers. If you Believe this claim, join the Pauline Church, and follow Paul's behavioral/moral instructions, Paul told his followers, you will become part of "the body of Christ" and "be saved." --

--To whomever wrote that The Gospel of Thomas was a later spurious text. That is simply incorrect. A number of the Christian gospels found in the Nag Hammadi library are contemporaneous with, or actually predate some of the gospels in the canon. Look it up.

They were left out for obvious reasons: they teach that a direct path to God is possible, and the Church of Rome was not having any of that. The bible as we know it was not compiled until the 5th century. And has had more revisions than all of the text contained within it. These are facts, not suppositions. Do some critical research and you will learn how scholars know what they do. The works of Bart Ehrman (even if he is wrong on historicity) are otherwise very good for critical analysis. You can also watch Mythvision Podcast on YT. It is critical but if youre a Christian you will learn tons of facts you didnt know before. cheers.

@a lucientes - I would encourage you to also check out Lee Strobel, an atheist attorney (Yale) who worked as an investigative journalist for the Chicago Tribune who set out to prove the Bible & its accounts, wrong. Lee's wife became a Christian (if I'm not mistaken) while they were married & it caused quite a bit of conflict, the reason behind why he wanted to prove the Bible & specifically, Jesus's death & resurrection, false. He also has a website & multiple videos that are rather fascinating. https://leestrobel.com/

@JDC he didnt say its a choice... just not the smartest.

@JDC he didnt say its a choice... just not the smartest.

She just didn't have a snickers for a while

She just didn't have a snickers for a while

@JDC but choosing to murder is a choice - sympathizer.

@JDC but choosing to murder is a choice - sympathizer.

@a lucientes There is eveidence that a man named Yeshua (Greek: Jesus) existed and was crucified around that time period. But the debate was whether Jesus was just a teacher or Son of God. That being said, all societies organize themselves into hierarchies so the carrying the pack idea (I don't know if that was in the Bible, but it was likely a Roman military thing), that idea would be based on said hierarchy and doing your job well for your boss.

As for the Gnostic texts like gospel of Thomas, they were widely disproved as people just wanting the fame of writing or finding a book. Where the real debate is the Apocryphal texts because it was clear that Jesus and other Jews had studied them for educational purposes. You're correct in saying there were many offshoots but there still are today as well.

@Mish375 S I know people saw it as normal back then but Jesus is supposed to be the son of god or god itself. Its not condemned anywhere in the New Testament, in fact there are numerous places where it teaches submission. If youre tasked with carrying a pack for one mile, carry it for two. (It was not uncommon for Roman soldiers to commandeer labor), Having read numerous books on the issue of historicity (Including Erhman's Did Jesus Exist?) I tend to tilt more in the direction that the whole of it is mythology and mysticism. I say bc the earliest writings we have describe Jesus him as a purely revelatory figure, there are no contemporaneous accounts,, so that even there was some rabbi at the root of the religion, he is completely lost to history. The early Christian world was wildly diverse. But also bc you can see the traditions that preceded it, out of which it arose...Richard Carrier has a video online called The Gospel According to Carrier where he describes some of the process that it underwent. To get an idea of how diverse it was, read the gospels found in Nag Hamadi library - texts like The Gospel of Thomas. The Thunder - Perfect Mind. The gospel of Judas, and others,, which are from the same period as the ones that were put into the canon hundreds of years later.

@a lucientes Jesus never supported slavery. That was Paul, I believe, who wrote to a slave who had run from his abusive master to return. (This is a debated part of the Bible even within Christianity) You have to remember there are cultural considerations too. People back then saw slavery as normal - as horrible as it was.

@MacyJane Well in a sociopath's mind, now her path was clear to John. So it wouldn't surprise me if she used his grief and need for comfort to seduce him briefly before the relationship fizzled out.

@Edgar M sociopathy is a legitimate mental illness that usually stems from trauma. its kinds gross when people stigmatize it like that

@Edgar M sociopathy is a legitimate mental illness that usually stems from trauma. its kinds gross when people stigmatize it like that

@a lucientes Yes, there are some far-out things in the Bible, that is true. But, it’s no more far out than what science shows us! Our universe is pretty darn fascinating and downright incredible and it is obvious to me that there was a Creator of this cosmos. When Jesus was referring to a slave doing what the master says, He was simply referring to people who worked for others which is pretty much built into mankind. To say He was promoting slavery is just ludicrous because it is clear that that was the antithesis of who Jesus was! In fact, He came to free the slaves which is exactly what He did when He died on that cross for our wrongdoings, freeing us to live an abundant life through Him now, and an eternal life in paradise simply for accepting His sacrifice on the cross.

@Sandra Ressel We have the illusion (or delusion, take your pick) of free will. The bible also has talking animals, people walking on water, angels, demons and witches, etc. Jesus never once condemns slavery, in fact, he tells slaves to obey their masters. Not exactly the position any moral being would take. The bible was written by people, of course and it's myth and mysticism, clear as day. Read other mythology/holy books and you'll see that. (That Jesus ranks higher on Raglan's hero scale than Hercules, is revealing).

Much of it was meant to be allegorical (-or do you believe you can really walk on water and move mountains simply by virtue of your faith? Of course not) at the time that it was written. Nothing has changed since. Interpreting it literally is missing the entire point.  I will say, quoting the bible, when the subject at hand is philosophical, is not the best source if you wish to be taken seriously. It has nothing whatever to do with whether or not people have actual free will, i.e. the ability to do other than they did. It is the present that gives rise to the future.  We are not the authors of our thoughts or impulses. We have the illusion of choice bc we can look back on the range of options we might have chosen, but cannot explain why we chose one thing over the other, even if we have some story we tell ourselves about why we like chocolate more than vanilla. We simply do. No one maps their own neurophysiology, picks their DNA or where and when theyre born. No one chooses to be a psychopath, or a drug addict, or a genius, or a simpleton, etc. This doesnt mean we have no choice, only that the range of options open to us are the result of chance or pre-existing causes, neither of which we have a hand in.  If you look closer, you will see that what we have is the illusion of choice. Watch some philosophical analyses on the subject. Sam Harris has some presentations on YT where he talks about it. Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder did a video on the subject not that long ago called: You don't have free will, but don't worry.  But one needs to have an open and objective mind to approach and consider challenging conclusions. If we begin with: "Of course that's wrong" and then quote from a book full of magic and superstition, we're not going to get very far. We  need to know why things are in order to understand how they actually are. Otherwise, how could the world be a sphere? That would mean upside down people on the bottom. So, our natural impression are often misleading. Regarding the bible, remember, it is the claim, not the evidence. Actually walk on water, and that would be evidence. (Water, btw,  is an ancient symbol for matter or the material world. Once you know that, the meaning behind that teaching makes a lot more sense, as opposed to thinking it is meant to convey literally walking on water).
Check out Mythvision podcast - they do some good critical analysis of the history of religion sometimes. At least it will start to give you some historical context for what is in the bible and you'll see that those stories and motifs are the result of different traditions coming together in the Mediterranean (you never wondered why the New Testament is written in Greek as opposed to Hebrew or Aramaic?)  that long predated the rise of Christianity.  -pardon my comment got so long. best.

@Sandra Ressel We have the illusion (or delusion, take your pick) of free will. The bible also has talking animals, people walking on water, angels, demons and witches, etc. _Jesus_ never once condemns slavery, in fact, he tells slaves to obey their masters. Not exactly the position any moral being would take. The bible was written by people, of course and it's myth and mysticism, clear as day. Read other mythology/holy books and you'll see that. (That Jesus ranks higher on Raglan's _hero scale_ than Hercules, is revealing).

Much of it was meant to be allegorical (-or do you believe you can really walk on water and move mountains simply by virtue of your faith? Of course not) at the time that it was written. Nothing has changed since. Interpreting it literally is missing the entire point.  I will say, quoting the bible, when the subject at hand is philosophical, is not the best source if you wish to be taken seriously. It has nothing whatever to do with whether or not people have actual free will, i.e. the ability to do other than they did. It is the present that gives rise to the future.  We are not the authors of our thoughts or impulses. We have the illusion of choice bc we can look back on the range of options we might have chosen, but cannot explain why we chose one thing over the other, even if we have some story we tell ourselves about why we like chocolate more than vanilla. We simply do. No one maps their own neurophysiology, picks their DNA or where and when theyre born. No one chooses to be a psychopath, or a drug addict, or a genius, or a simpleton, etc. This doesnt mean we have no choice, only that the range of options open to us are the result of chance or pre-existing causes, neither of which we have a hand in.  If you look closer, you will see that what we have is the illusion of choice. Watch some philosophical analyses on the subject. Sam Harris has some presentations on YT where he talks about it. Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder did a video on the subject not that long ago called: *You don't have free will, but don't worry.*  But one needs to have an open and objective mind to approach and consider challenging conclusions. If we begin with: "Of course that's wrong" and then quote from a book full of magic and superstition, we're not going to get very far. We  need to know why things are in order to understand how they actually are. Otherwise, how could the world be a sphere? That would mean upside down people on the bottom. So, our natural impression are often misleading. Regarding the bible, remember, it is the claim, not the evidence. Actually walk on water, and that would be evidence. (Water, btw,  is an ancient symbol for matter or the material world. Once you know that, the meaning behind that teaching makes a lot more sense, as opposed to thinking it is meant to convey literally walking on water).
Check out Mythvision podcast - they do some good critical analysis of the history of religion sometimes. At least it will start to give you some historical context for what is in the bible and you'll see that those stories and motifs are the result of different traditions coming together in the Mediterranean (you never wondered why the New Testament is written in Greek as opposed to Hebrew or Aramaic?)  that long predated the rise of Christianity.  -pardon my comment got so long. best.

@mel I think she bit her because Sherry fought! I think Stephanie shows up with a gun and wants Sherry to see her and know she is going to die because she hated Sherry so much, and Sherry put up a fight and they grappled for the gun and Sherry gave us the evidence to convict her killer even if it did take years.

@a lucientes Of course we have free will and choice. However, there is the force of good and evil out there and one will serve Satan until they decide to serve God. This is why Jesus came and paid the price for us and offers it to us just for the asking. God gave us the Holy Spirit who is ever-present and everywhere. I ask you to consider Him, and to open your mind to the possibility of Him. I do believe He rose out of that tomb after being brutally crucified for us and won our eternal life for us. If you aren’t a believer, I understand these things sound very strange, but faith in Him can be very small, He said, like a tiny seed. As you trust in Him, your knowledge of Him grows as does your faith. But in Romans 10:10 is the key to eternal life for all men. He loved us all and died for us all, regardless of our station in this world. He shows no favoritism. He loved us all enough to die for us! But, yet, He lives!

@MacyJane I’m not sure if that is correct, Marcy. I’m no expert, mind you, but I have followed this case for years. It is true that he dated her when he and his wife were engaged and this Stephanie would just show up and offer a booty call even though he told her he was not in love with her and was going to marry his fiancé.’ He did come clean with his wife before he married her about the cheating and then together they put the brakes on Stephanie stalking them. I think that burned her inside and she just got plain old green crazy-eyed vengeance!

@Sandra Ressel
                               VERY GOOD Sandra.
                              Numbers 32:23 (KJV)

@Sandra Ressel
                               VERY GOOD Sandra.
                              Numbers 32:23 (KJV)

@Grigeral no shit? Never said otherwise. But someone said it was her fault for BEING a sociopath. Lol.

@Grigeral no shit? Never said otherwise. But someone said it was her fault for BEING a sociopath. Lol.

@Jesse "Most psychopaths or sociopaths do not have ASPD" No idea where you're getting your information there?

ASPD is the medical term for the personality disorder that reflects what once was covered by psychopathy and sociopathy.  Neither of those terms are used anymore.

And that is literally from a psychiatrist I used to see.  Several of them in fact.

@JDC You don't have a choice in being psychopathic or sociopathic, nor is anything inherently 'wrong' with being either.  But you 'do' have a choice in killing someone.  Lacking empathy does not mean you don't understand what's expected of you, nor does it means you don't understand consequences of your actions.

The fact that she got away with it for so long however makes me think she was less of an idiot than people might think.  The cops were just very tenacious.

There’s a scripture that says “Be sure your sin will find you out.”

There’s a scripture that says “Be sure your sin will find you out.”

@Patrick Norris She might not be a sociopath, it might have just been a very heated confrontation between her and the victim. She does come off as impulsive but that alone doesn't make a person a sociopath.

DNA analysis came a long since 1986, a time where eyewitnesses, fingerprints, and old school techniques were still commonplace. There must've been a struggle for her to bite the victim.. the victim was about 6 feet tall and athletic herself.

Lawyers train you to say I don't recall if you are unsure? She is using this to her advantage

Lawyers train you to say I don't recall if you are unsure? She is using this to her advantage

At around 54 or 55 minutes, her true persona starts to show

At around 54 or 55 minutes, her true persona starts to show

@Patrick Norris , very planned out and premeditated

@Patrick Norris , very planned out and premeditated

The pity for the murderer exceeds the pity for victim.  The husband is certainly complicit. If she threatened her in front of 8 witnesses at work, why the delay?

The pity for the murderer exceeds the pity for victim.  The husband is certainly complicit. If she threatened her in front of 8 witnesses at work, why the delay?

@Patrick Norris tell that to Kemper, bet he’s smarter than you!

@Patrick Norris tell that to Kemper, bet he’s smarter than you!

@mel That would be an overwhelming mix of resentment, fury, and lack of inhibitions.

@mel That would be an overwhelming mix of resentment, fury, and lack of inhibitions.

dude right? and why the hell did she feel the need to bite her

dude right? and why the hell did she feel the need to bite her

@MacyJane This is a very underrated comment. Thank you for sharing. I think the narrator mentioned that they slept together after she died. She sounds like a truly vindictive person.

@MacyJane This is a very underrated comment. Thank you for sharing. I think the narrator mentioned that they slept together after she died. She sounds like a truly vindictive person.

@sixerrexis THEY WERE MADE OUT OF PIZZA CRUST?!

@sixerrexis THEY WERE MADE OUT OF PIZZA CRUST?!

@PointsofData you know you can literally just google ASPD and see that you are incorrect.

@PointsofData you know you can literally just google ASPD and see that you are incorrect.

@PointsofData I agree I was wrong with compulsive disorder I either intended compulsive behavior or impulsive behavior. Both being border line interchangeable

@PointsofData I agree I was wrong with compulsive disorder I either intended compulsive behavior or impulsive behavior. Both being border line interchangeable

@PointsofData also compulsive behavior includes suicide, harming others “Thoughts, urges, or behaviors that persist despite negatively affecting health, job, or relationships” the literal definition.

@PointsofData anti social personality disorder is the same thing.

@PointsofData anti social personality disorder is the same thing.

@PointsofData I got compulsive and impulsive behavior mixed up I’m sorry. Instead of shamming me how about you educate me lol. You’re not doing anyone any good by shaming, it shows that you don’t even want others to even consider your views whether they are wrong or right.

@Jesse please stop. "Sociopath" is not a medical term; Anti Social Personality Disorder is what someone is diagnosed with if they have sociopathic traits.

@Jesse please stop. "Sociopath" is not a medical term; Anti Social Personality Disorder is what someone is diagnosed with if they have sociopathic traits.

@Patrick Norris you can be smart in those situations. Imagine all the undiscovered bodies around the world. Pretty stupid to think what you said.

@Patrick Norris you can be smart in those situations. Imagine all the undiscovered bodies around the world. Pretty stupid to think what you said.

@Goatboi Yes, but most psychopaths or sociopaths do not have ASPD.

@Goatboi Yes, but most psychopaths or sociopaths do not have ASPD.

@PointsofData agreed that’s what separates a “normal” person from someone who needs help.

@PointsofData agreed that’s what separates a “normal” person from someone who needs help.

@a lucientes yes but compulsions such as murder and the total disregard for others is what separates a normal person with compulsions and someone who has a compulsion disorder. Typically someone who sufferers from compulsion disorder rape/murder people, steals, lies and much more. Again lack of empathy and something very wrong with their brain. Impulsive behavior is also a not great thing to have going for you lol same type of actions.

@Jesse yes anti social personality disorder is also another topic that’s very interesting. They usually are sociopaths/psychopaths, and lack the basic human emotions and empathy for others.

@Goatboi Interesting choice of words. Psychopathy and Sociopathy are not in the DSM specifically because they do no cause any degree of inability to live your life, contrary - it may even be an evolutionary advantage.

Anti-Social-Personality-Disorder, is however in the DSM. And this particular condition is what most studies on 'psychopaths' have been conducted on, specifically within prison populations.

But it isn't helpful to conflate these things.

@sixerrexis Wait, what? What case is this?! I need it for research purposes lol

@sixerrexis Wait, what? What case is this?! I need it for research purposes lol

@a lucientes what a sad way to go through life, thinking like that.<br>Humans certainly have instincts and compulsions, but we also have the ability to stop, reason and choose. Baffling that big brain philosophers overlook this.

@a lucientes what a sad way to go through life, thinking like that.
Humans certainly have instincts and compulsions, but we also have the ability to stop, reason and choose. Baffling that big brain philosophers overlook this.

I highly doubt it dude. She was pulled in because they were going over the case from a clean slate and wanted to check prime suspects (ex who was reported as having issues with the victim). The bite maybe clinched it, but you really think this interrogation wouldn't have laid heavy suspicion on her?

@Alexander If people could act other than they do we would be living in a different  universe than the one in which we live.  The notion that we are ones who are in charge of our thoughts and actions is an illusion, however persistent. The present is what gives rise to the future. That people have a range of choices and could have done something else is an illusion. We act in response to our compulsions.  I realize this is not how we think we experience the world, but that is not actually what is going on. Look closer. You might also want to watch some videos on why free will does not actually exist. Sam Harris has numerous and Sabine Hossenfelder put one up recently.

@Patrick Norris You make it sound like she had a choice.

@Patrick Norris You make it sound like she had a choice.

I know right...AFTER she killed her. She hated this poor girl so much for being chosen over her. That's it. She hated her so deeply and intensely that she shot her 3 times, knowing surely the gun shots would possibly alert someone, and yet she couldn't resist taking out her anger, jealousy, bitterness, insecurity and resentment out on the lifeless body of this innocent woman. She beat her face beyond recognition and then she bit her. As sad and disturbing as it is, thankfully she did leave behind that DNA that screwed her in the end. I read somewhere that a lot of the early case information went "missing" (including statements from the victim's husband and father both pointing at Lazarus), so I believe it's likely Lazarus got rid of that information through her position as a police officer. But she couldn't get rid of the DNA evidence and the bite mark. What I don't understand is how Sherri's husband (after initially pointing at Lazarus as a possible suspect with motive) would go on to date her after the murder (the woman who murdered his wife, which he may or may not have suspected). That's if I heard it right. He went on to date her. After his wife's murder.

@Michael Evans very scary and dark, they’re almost a completely different breed of human. Casey Anthony is a very interesting example of a true sociopath, her behavior towards the death of her daughter is one of the scariest things to see, but the case is very interesting to see the mind of a true sociopath.

@Patrick Norris nobody wants to be a sociopath it’s not a choice, something very wrong with the brain that makes them lack empathy. Very primal and saddening that people suffer from being a sociopath, and most of the time they’re too ignorant to know that they are a sociopath.

@JDC I don’t think being a sociopath is a choice, i couldn’t imagine anyone wanting to be a sociopath. Agreed.

@JDC I don’t think being a sociopath is a choice, i couldn’t imagine anyone wanting to be a sociopath. Agreed.

It's true, many of these crime summaries are solved because of the smallest things.

It's true, many of these crime summaries are solved because of the smallest things.

Reminds me of the couple guys who killed and got cought because they didn't eat they're pizza crust 🤣

Reminds me of the couple guys who killed and got cought because they didn't eat they're pizza crust 🤣

Being a sociopath and murdering someone isn't the smartest thing in the first place.

Being a sociopath and murdering someone isn't the smartest thing in the first place.


I just have one question....<br>the statue of limitations in CA is 5 years for felonies since 1830 so how could Lazarus be convicted?

I just have one question....
the statue of limitations in CA is 5 years for felonies since 1830 so how could Lazarus be convicted?


She is very carefully picking her words,and what to say.An innocent person would talk without hesitation.


Interrogator: "Hello, how are you?"
Killer: "Well, gosh I mean, pfft, ugh, well I mean, gosh I mean,.."
French Dude: "1 Million years later."
Killer: "........gosh I mean, I guess I'm doing ok, how about you?"


Wow… Killers can be so deceptive… It is scary….


This woman’s facial expressions are legitimately frightening

Did anybody else get a Charles Manson vibe when it came to a lot of her facial expressions? Especially the repeated one at the very end.

Huh, I don't see anything odd about them. The curse of the 'tism I suppose lol

@Виталий Сергеев wow lol

@Виталий Сергеев wow lol

@It's Just Felix yeah, yeah. go on using your iPhone...

Виталий Сергеев

I thought everyone was just roasting TF outta her but then I saw her face at 26:20 and I nearly spat my drink out


"How many years has it been?!??!?!" (A million, obviously.)


Q: What's the definition of a deer caught in the headlights?<br>A: Stephanie Lazarus

Q: What's the definition of a deer caught in the headlights?
A: Stephanie Lazarus


looks like you guys are getting some videos restored with heavy edits.  glad you're able to stay here but I'll def be subbing to the patreon to get the juicy bits


Man, she is a BAD liar. She's so over the top with her facial expressions. I imagine the name of her ex instilled a buzzing sensation through her entire body, her face going numb so that she felt the need to over-contort it. Her panic is so evident.