For all the people saying: This is win95, not MS-DOS, <b>This is win95 in DOS mode</b>

For all the people saying: This is win95, not MS-DOS, *This is win95 in DOS mode*

TheCK Hungary Mit vársz el egy ilyen nevű embertől?

yeah windows 95 and windows 98 has dos mode as well I tried bringing back dos mode in windows millennium edition but windows millennium edition was way too buggy and trying go for digital age.

@@heyitsyeabutidkklol no that's boot disk


Technically this BSOD is in DOS, but it was triggered in the DOS part of Windows 95. <br>The only thing I have against this video is the shitty camera focus.

Technically this BSOD is in DOS, but it was triggered in the DOS part of Windows 95.
The only thing I have against this video is the shitty camera focus.


It's in the windows loading stage. So not entirely DOS mode but in the booting mode, most likely protected mode. Either the real mode or protected mode part of VFAT.VXD returned a fatal error.


This is technically a Windows 95 BSoD, but it's close enough I guess.


I found a insert disk error when installing MS-DOS 4.00 (1988) through the Select program, it looked a lot like a blue screen, I have a screenshot


Whos here searching up endermans oldest vids?


And what if that happens without even Windows being installed?


i got this error on my windows 98 SE vm.  seted up my pc and run c:\con\con. after a restart i got this error. everytime i get this error. finally i deleted vm


1:00 if you download free robux in a windows 9x computer


Microsoft windows 95 setup. says at top at 0:40


Woah, that’s a Samsung no Samar TV! (I know by the UI at the start)


XMS cache problem<br>TRY decrease RAM capacity to 32 or 128 MB

XMS cache problem
TRY decrease RAM capacity to 32 or 128 MB


That's a Windows 95 in MS-DOS mode. Windows 95 in MS-DOS mode!

That's a Windows 95 in MS-DOS mode. *Windows* *95* *in* *MS-DOS* *mode!*


Everyone who disliked thinks this is win95


@@lordkab00m18 i dont even remember i wrote this comment


Albert C. L. - Gaming, Tech And More camera focus


I tried it in real dos AKA dos 6.22 and it does not work <br>Idk why ??   LLLOOOOLLLLL

I tried it in real dos AKA dos 6.22 and it does not work
Idk why ??   LLLOOOOLLLLL

(found in the description) You actually need to do it on a Windows 95 setup disk.


You are attempting to load Windows by executing Win.com without the required vfat drivers loaded, there error isn't from DOS it's from Windows.


@@HarryBlueJay Yeah, but that doesn't really matter. MS-DOS by itself doesn't have a BSOD, it's the underlying Windows that's showing it. I mean, you wouldn't get a BSOD on pure MS-DOS.


ендерман,цэ ты?

ендерман,цэ ты?


Ender's Show вы знаете русский?

Ender's Show вы знаете русский?

Andrew Sos Он русский но часть подписчиков Английские .


K0T BЖYX кот иммено

K0T BЖYX кот иммено


No, it's an installation,some look like an bsod.


Мужик, ты спалился что ты русский))

Мужик, ты спалился что ты русский))

И че, давно еще

И че, давно еще


Ms-COMMANDS
!HELP not
!QUIT JUFX(_#(¥€'₩£_
!ECHO text commands
!SHUTDOWN Shutdown /-1+4 code
!Delete WiNBwtKuyfIuYRD7TTdctdcu Delete win32


WIN: Falled computer completing.. 10%<br>Bsod: BSOD BSOD BSOD BSOD

WIN: Falled computer completing.. 10%
Bsod: BSOD BSOD BSOD BSOD


ｓｙｓｔｅｍ　ｈａｌｔｅｄ．

ｓｙｓｔｅｍ　ｈａｌｔｅｄ．


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dlryCLU_vk I've found a better trick, Enderman.


Royal__Twistt 12 😙😍😆😃😊😎😆😍😊🙂😙😚😢😢😔😲😖👾👻🤡😺🤡😸👽👻👾😿👾👩⚕🧓👩🎓👩👩🏭👩🌾👩⚖🧑👩🏭👨👩🕵👳🕵👩🎤👸💂🧘🗣🚶🧖🏃🗣🤼🚵🤼🚵⛹🚵✊🤚🤟🤜🤟🙌👍👐🤟🤜🤝💗👁🗨💘👁🗨💋💓🗯💫💭🕶💨👖💨💥💨🧦👙👜👞👝🎩👝🧢💎🧢💄


Typing win in MS-DOS will win you a BSOD

Kai Bannon no I tried it it will not work cause windows isn’t installed msdos is not windows it’s dos


Now try loading a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM in a VM!

That would take 100 years. <insert spongebob time card here>

What are you looking for?

You would need an absolute beast PC to create a VM inside a VM(in a VM(in a VM))<br>like 128GB of ram.........or 1TB of ram :>

You would need an absolute beast PC to create a VM inside a VM(in a VM(in a VM))
like 128GB of ram.........or 1TB of ram :>