IA32 isnt Itanium, Itanium never had a 32-bit version, and in fact, didnt even support running 32-bit code. IA32 is Intel Architecture 32-bit, or what everybody except for intel calls it apparently, x86

Can't help but almost puke when I deal with the computer architecture nomenclature! You're right, but it's really sad that you are.

@@Endermanch gotta love when marketing > usability

@@Endermanch don't worry, a lot of people get really mixed up with it all. The only reason I noticed it is I constantly have to remind people that the gigantic shite stain on Intel's record named Itanium even exists

@@Endermanchbtw ia64 windows XP have Efi support

@@Endermanchsince ia64 does not have legacy boot at all<br>Legacy boot is x86 thing, not on arm, risc-v, mips, ia64…

@@Endermanchsince ia64 does not have legacy boot at all
Legacy boot is x86 thing, not on arm, risc-v, mips, ia64…

Came here to say this as well...nvm the confusion that is amd64...or should I call it EM64T? Ooooo maybe x64? Err how about x86_64? No? Then maybe x86-64? Fine fine Intel 64? Guess that only leaves IA-32e(I shit you not)... but most importantly just don't call it IA-64 cause that's a totally different thing...yeahhhhhhh I got nothing on that one...

@@ScooptaLet me clear this up
EM64T (Extended Memory 64 Technology) = Intel 64 (Not Itanium 64)
AMD64 = AMD 64 (sometimes, it referrs as "AMD x86-64 Architecture")
IA-32 = Intel Architecture
There are no such thing as IA-32e

@@toukomadobethe IA-32e term is actually used by Intel in their manuals to refer to the 64-bit mode of x86-64(also known as long mode)

@@thepwrtank18Sums up drug companies. They put out the most god awful allophone spam.

IA32 are x86 proccesors of the XP era<br>IA64 are x64 proccesors of today

IA32 are x86 proccesors of the XP era
IA64 are x64 proccesors of today

2:32 UEFI must support fat32 by spec, but your ESP can be any filesystem, so long as your UEFI can read it.

@@Galaxy.Windows IA64 is dead Itanium and IT IS NOT x64(=AMD64)

@@idogaming3532If we go by the letter of the spec, no. The ESP MUST BE FAT32. But i've yet to see a firmware that doesn't support directly booting from partitions other than the ESP. Even Apple doesn't shy away from this rule and have a reserved FAT32 ESP and does use it for firmware updates(though uneccesary since the firmware is capable of reading HFS+/APFS and loads the macOS bootloader from predefined locations)

@@Notevenmad955 it just so happens that everyone supported FAT32 at the time

I don't think Intel is alone in not calling it x86, Most documentation I've read calls it i386

@@idogaming3532 I was talking about the ESP being any filesystem, it can't be any filesystem. It must be FAT32 if we go by the spec(or rather the flavor defined in the spec that totally isn't just FAT32). But FS support for other partitions(that can be used for data or miscelanious purposes) it is guaranteed to be FAT12/16/32 and the CD filesystems.

@@Notevenmad955 ESP must be FAT32. Apple doesn't do UEFI boot in the standard way when booting macOS, but does in fact use the ESP for Bootcamp.

@@toukomadobe ...I'm making a joke...I know all the differences also IA-32e is another Intel name for EM64T/Intel 64...it unfortunately does exist. If you do a bit of looking around online you'll see references to it before Intel finally settled on Intel 64. It stands for Intel architecture 32 enhanced...idea being it's x86 enhanced to 64 bits

@@wilh3lmmusic yeah, same. I'm just making a joke at all the different possible names. Amd64 is usually the most common with x64 probably being #2 I think...

@@Galaxy.Windows IA64 is end<br>x64 today are AMD64

@@Galaxy.Windows IA64 is end
x64 today are AMD64

The IA32/IA64 thing is so bad that a very popular open source project, Mozilla Firefox, has a define in their codebase called INTEL_ARCHITECTURE. You know what it refers to? x86 and x86_64... which is completely wrong because Itanium was IA64. But they can't think of anything catchy to replace it with that makes more sense, because IA32_AND_AMD64 just doesn't have the same ring to it... so it seemingly gets left in due to inertia.

@@Galaxy.Windows No, Itanium is long dead and never used anymore.

@@windows8.1proforthewin im not talking about Itanium im talking about x64 processors of today

@@Galaxy.Windowsx64 which’s x86_64 or amd64(even you have intel cpu it is still amd64)

@@toukomadobe but, doea AMD64 and IA64 is the same as x86_64 and x64?<br>also i wonder why 32 bit became x86

@@toukomadobe but, doea AMD64 and IA64 is the same as x86_64 and x64?
also i wonder why 32 bit became x86

To get the confusion:
IA32 = x86
IA64 = Itanium. It's not x64 we know today. IA64 cannot run IA32 applications.
AMD64 = EM64T = x86-64 = 64-bit x86 that we're using today. AMD64 can run IA32 applications. Yes 64-bit x86 was designed by AMD, not Intel.

@@MikuAuahDark because AMD64 were an extension of IA32 right? also why Intel calls it EM64T<br>but why 32 bit is called x86 instead of x32 since 64 bit was called x64?

@@MikuAuahDark because AMD64 were an extension of IA32 right? also why Intel calls it EM64T
but why 32 bit is called x86 instead of x32 since 64 bit was called x64?

@@shiro3146 As for why "EM64T" (Extended Memory 64 Technology), it's just because Intel I guess.

As for why it's called x86 and not x32, you'll have to dig more about the CPU history. The original processor is called Intel 8086, a 16-bit CPU. Then there's their successor, 80186, 80286, 80386, and 80486. We simplify them to "x86" because the successor CPU name always ends up in "86".


this is what i tune in for, strange ways to install windows, honestly great vid as always

You're only getting likes because you're a member

@@Abigblueworld i love being a condescending dickhead for no reason at all

@@Abigblueworld you realize that i don't care about likes, also the video just came out and it takes time for comments to get liked

@Abigblueworld don't be mad if someone gets likes. On some video you got alot of likes and yet you act like you are a boss. How about... you buy membership to support him?

@@phoneticalballsackmaybe they just want to support the creator?

@@uninable also that was actually the reason why I got a membership

Does that even matter that you have membership

@@jynz_l Buying membership for someone who runs a ripoff/copy channel? Nope. I'd rather support Micheal MJD who actually makes genuine videos.

@v5test991  who's ripoff? And you liked your own comment.

I did not like my own comment. People are learning about the truth.@@jynz_l

@@jynz_l A bootleg version of the original one


Some real-world cases of pure 32-bit UEFI hardware that I can think of were Intel Atom-based laptops and tablets that used Bay Trail SoCs. Ironically the CPU itself is 64-bit, but from what I've gathered is that 64-bit UEFI was too buggy to release, so 32-bit UEFI was a stopgap to get things going. I don't know how well Windows XP would handle an eMMC-based boot device, though.

Yeah, it was a PITA trying to get Linux Mint installed on one of these.

Everything seems to work. it's just that the bootloader requires manual installation because heaven forbid someone has 32bit uefi.

Also, early intel MacBooks were 32bit, but they don't use standard UEFI bootloaders.

I actually own an Atom CPU laptop, and I didn't try getting Windows XP on UEFI there yet. But the XP Integral edition works just perfectly. the laptop is an old Acer Aspire One and just as mentioned, the x86 efi is visibly rushed, due to how poor it is in editable variables

Yes, you are absolutely right. In fact, the CPU is x64 but installing 64bit OS is a pain in the arse, due to the x32 UEFI bios

i'm guessing emmc drivers would have to be backported, because windows 8 was the first to have basic emmc support (discovered this while trying to boot windows 7 on a braswell celeron)

I remember these Bay Trail Atoms being a real pain to install anything that isn't Windows 8 or 10. Trekstor had these cheap tablets that I thought were great for experimenting and I was wrong.

@@louism771 These chips were made when Intel got scared by competition from android tablets, so it's not surprising they don't support anything below windows 8, they created this platform just as a low cost alternative to ARM chips (which is why there are some non-windows tablets or even phones using them).

@@hikkamorii sadly they sold StrongARM division with all its people working on it
otherwise we have a good arm cpus that competitive enough to scare qualcomm
but funny enough, both amd and intel sold their mobile division almost at the same time, amd with adreno and intel with strongARM


Hey, if you want to boot XP x64 on UEFI, I assembled all the required files in an ISO a couple months ago. I made a video about it as well, using VMware. You’ll need to copy a BCD file from the 16497 ISO to use it though.

stop trying to break/install windows 11 everywhere

Send me the link for that iso please or upload it to the internet archive thank you..

You can also use Longhorn Build 5384.4 for x64. It doesn't need a BCD.

I forgot this comment even existed in the first place. I come back 5 months later and it has 200 likes. Nearly double what most of my newer videos get.

@@laglife very sad. Know that I <b>LOVE</b> your videos, and when I recieve a notification I jump on it

@@laglife very sad. Know that I *LOVE* your videos, and when I recieve a notification I jump on it


glad to see you still going strong after the youtube fiasco, also luke the absolute legend is back


6:22 Ahh, yes, Windows XP, totally how I remembered it, literally tilted and scrunched to the right.

How about you put everything all in one instead of commenting again and again? Unnecessary comment sounds like attention seeker


Because of you, I've got into OS's! Thank you man, I am watching you for 2 years now, videos are always fun to watch


windows xp on uefi is the greatest invention in human history


You briefly mentioned Vista support. The 32-bit version does not support any EFI version/architecture, but I believe the 64-bit version of Vista does feature 64-bit UEFI support.


FYI VMware's UEFI firmware contains a kinda-CSM, basically most of it is gone but the graphics stuff is still there. VirtualBox or QEMU's UEFI are pure class 3 (no CSM at ALL), and XP still boots there, just with no bootscreen. I'd say VMware's UEFI is still closer to what you'd find on real hardware though since most UEFI firmware still contain CSMs, although some newer hardware (post-2020) doesn't.

Oh well, CSM won't be possible with x86-S coming in the future anyways.

Only reason that x86 stays today is compatibility with software from ancient times. If they simplify x86, compatibility may be dead. Is shutdown /s /t 0 of x86 soon?

@@vaiovmnobody is running 16-bit OSes and programs without emulation. And x86-S if you read up what it means is just removing support for 32-bit OSes(there are 0 reasons to run a 32-bit version of windows and old versions of windows already struggle with modern hardware) and support for 16-bit protected mode code(which only Wine uses to run 16bit windows apps, they can just emulate) and neutering features OSes didn’t use like segmentation(outside the bare minimum), rings 1 and 2(which nobody used), ring 3 io instructions(which outside of a few niches wasn’t used either)

@@Notevenmad955 That'll affect compatibility, how you put it.

x86 isn't the future, ARM is. x86 is inefficient and power-consuming. So, you mean CSM won't be possible in the future with ARM 😃

@@tennesine as soon as ARM becomes a real threat to Intel and AMD, x86 efficiency will improve massively. I personally will stay on x86 as long as it's viable OR until ARM is standardized like x86 is (proper ACPI + UEFI implementations)

x86-S is already a step towards more efficiency, Intel is dropping legacy 16 and 32-bit mode, and leaving 32-bit software only able to run in a VM essentially.

@@laglife How do you know x86 will improve massively? I'm sure x86-S will help, but will it be enough to beat ARM? Why do you want to stay on x86? Is it for modularity? Not everything in an ARM system has to be on the same chip and there are systems that have been made that are just as modular as x86 desktops. I'm going to jump on the ARM bus as soon as I get my next PC and when I get a new laptop, definitely. If you want to stay in the past, that's your choice. Just know your system will always be less efficient hee hee

You can make x86 as efficient as possible, but with it being a complex instruction set architechure, it can never get up to the level of ARM just because of the way it inherently works. They have tried to make x86 more like ARM as far as power efficiency with hybrid x86 processors. I believe that's how most processors work today, but obviously it hasn't been good enough since ARM laptops, for example, have way longer battery life.

Also, x86-S will be able to run 32-bit apps, just not 32-bit system code in a 64-bit OS 🙂. The Intel Article says it will use "the simplified segmentation model of 64-bit for segmentation support for 32-bit applications, matching what modern operating systems already use." So similar to how WoW64 works, for example, but built in to the processor which sounds pretty cool actually

@@tennesine Feels like the answer to that first one is pretty obvious, Intel and AMD are massive companies that rely on x86 processors (at least partially) for their revenue, and if suddenly that’s threatened by ARM because of its efficiency and power usage, x86 efficiency is going to improve massively. Also the CISC vs RISC argument is pretty irrelevant today, both modern ARM and x86 processors are not all that different internally, except for different hardware of course. Some x86 processors are still beating ARM in efficiency from time to time as well, so even that isn’t totally nailed down yet.

As for why I am staying on x86 (and in the past, apparently), it’s because I actually need the backwards compatibility that is possible on x86, and emulation outside of really old systems isn’t an option for me (too slow). If ARM can emulate x86 at a high enough speed and be sufficiently open and standardized enough to where I could boot whatever OS I want and have critical hardware work properly then I will not be opposed to switching. But I suspect that won’t happen for a few decades.

@@laglife They'll improve their processors the best they can. Intel and AMD probably wouldn't have to do as much right now to stay ahead of ARM. x86-S would for sure get them there. But, then ARM would just improve. After x86-S comes out and ARM catches up, it will be tough to stay ahead.

Well, disregard RISC vs CISC, internals, etc. Which is more power efficient, ARM. Which performs the best right now, ARM. Apple's M chips are the leading CPUs as far as benchmarks. Okay some x86 processors are beating ARM, but if we are talking accross the board, ARM wins. That's a goofy argument in my opinion. There are so many factors such as ages, type of processor (what device it's for), etc.

I'm confused about this "emulation outside of really old systems isn’t an option for me (too slow)" I'm sure the PCs/laptops coming out with the qualcomm chip and existing apple computers are more than capable of emulating whatever you need. An ARM Mac can emulate fine with VMWare, QEMU, UTM, whatever. I'm sure the qualcomm CPU will be capable too. Qualcomm claims it will be faster than the M chips.

Don't forget that x86 processors have an almost 10 year head start too. x86 was invented in the 70s whereas ARM was introduced in the 80s

@@laglife Hey man. I thought I knew it all. I'm sorry, you were right about nearly everything. I looked more into CPU architectures after I read an article about a guy who works for Intel said it's not the ISA that's making it more power efficient.

Here's what I've discovered:

If ARM was scaled up to x86, the power consumption would be about the same. The only reason ARM is more efficient is because everyone working on it has literally been putting everything into it being power efficient because it's used in mobile devices. Another reason it's more efficient is that it's simpler because it's newer and has less features than x86. So really it has two unfair advantages that make it more efficient. If Intel just invests more into power efficiency, x86 could be pretty good. x86-S will already help with power efficiency.

Also, RISC vs CISC truly does not matter. ARM is the least RISC, RISC architechure anyway. Internally, since the 90s or so, x86 chips have used RISC micro ops. Intel has made x86 function like a RISC processor. So again, ARM and x86 really aren't that much different if you take away the advantages ARM has. THe microarchitecture is really what matters. ISA does not make one processor more efficient that another. It's just a standard.

I'm a changed man. x86 forever. Honestly though, it would probably be best to just make a processor from scratch. You would need to add all the features, but you would only add what is needed today. Obviously like only 64 bit memory support for example. You wouldn't have to worry about upgrading from that because I don't think we're ever going to need anything higher! I was planning on working for Intel anyway just to learn more about how they make processors. I'm for sure planning to be a computer engineer


You’re going insane with those uploads! Which I don’t criticize, it’s really cool! I love Enderman‘s Content on YouTube, I watched him since early 2018. Your knowledge about windows is also really amazing 😉


5:10 Guys he has windows 12 already, we should praise him for all he's worth

i do have Windows 12 too (a newer build than his)

I thought I was the only one who saw that! BTW the VM is from an April Fools vid of Enderman (That video actually fooled me :( )


What you do is state of the art. I love to be part of this niche. Amazing video


Recently found your channel.  I would love to watch your videos, but I need voiceovers.  Seems like really cool and interesting content otherwise.  Cheers!


What about an iMac from 2007/2008? They had the weird 32bit locked down EFI didn't they? Maybe it's theoretically possible on them


this just proves that 5219's LOADER_PARAMETER_BLOCK (on x86) is compatible with XP, which, considering that Vista only added to the end of that structure, and to the end of LOADER_PARAMETER_EXTENSION, makes perfect sense.

quibble can apparently boot AMD64 XP, although I haven't tested that.


Windows XP is the godfather of Windows OSes, it can handle anything.


I love it when people tinker with old stuff to make it work and compatible for the nowadays stuff <br>Keep the good work 👍

I love it when people tinker with old stuff to make it work and compatible for the nowadays stuff
Keep the good work 👍


This is relevant to my needs!<br>Dreaming of adding an install like this to my Ventoy stick. 😈

This is relevant to my needs!
Dreaming of adding an install like this to my Ventoy stick. 😈


Есть куча китайских планшетов на атомах (я про архитектуру bay trail), которые не могут грузить ничего кроме UEFI IA32. Так что ты можешь купить за пару тыщ на авито дешманский планшет на винде, и попробовать это на реальном железе.


Fun fact: all Intel Macs use EFI, so this would probably work on a 32-bit Intel Mac

There's not much point in doing that since all Intel Macs support Bootcamp, but it would be interesting. I believe Apple's EFI isn't quite the same thing as UEFI, though.

@@pikachuchujelly7628 It’s close enough to boot stuff, and I’m more so suggesting an easy way to get a 32-bit EFI machine


Great job on your videos! All very entertaining and interesting. Could you do a video on windows RT and how to break it/jailbreak it?


That moment when Vista betas save the day XDD LONG LIVE LONGHORN


i'm guessing here, but your newer hardware failed to boot maybe because of UEFI Graphics Output Protocol? i've tried olders OS's with UEFI and it should work in a "compatibility" mode by your bios vendor, but some "newer" hardware is most likely to not have that mode and force UEFI GOP on every uefi loader, at least with my experience trying uefiseven by manatils i wasn't able to run it, not sure why, more likely because i'm still no great developer or just too dumb for this level of OS "patching" xD

the emoji is there because "hey look someones being smart on the internet"


my 17 hour edging streak broke when back from the dead started playing


Wow! Impressive job!<br>Thanks for the video!

Wow! Impressive job!
Thanks for the video!


enjoying the daily uploads! feels good for you to be back!


Enderman uploading videos so quickly!
There was a time when I would wait weeks for him to upload!
Thank You!


I think it is possible you just have to port MS-DOS or freedos to uefi and then you can run windows 98

@@milaszxxxdos is heavily bios dependant

not possible. there’d have to be a way to  boot DOS on UEFI.


The fact that you can get Windows XP working on UEFI while I can't even get Windows 7 working on UEFI is insanely impressive.

What PC you using? I've gotten it to work

@@DanTDMJace At the time it would've been some generic ASUS Windows 8.1 tablet and a Lenovo ideapad D330 Two in One


I know many people have said this, but I really love that you make so much Uploads recently. Really missed the content!❤


Nice music selection. I didn't knew that Neovaii was a no copyright artist.


6:17 this is what happened when I tried to boot Hiren's Boot CD PE on VMWare. After 15 minutes of changing the screen resolution, I finally got it to not be stretched


Windows XP is literally perfect with any software or computer, in fact, it's Microsoft's Best and most famous OS ever made.

I dunno about all that, and I maintain MicroXP just for the hell of it. Windows XP can at best run DirectX 9, while Windows 2000 with kernel patches can run DirectX 10.

Wow everyone knows that. God stop attention seeking

@@potatotheboredone windows 7's better, not hating on xp tho

@@G_Fantastic Windows 7 is more capable than XP, no doubt. But better? Well that totally depends on what you want your system to do.

Windows 7 totally dropped overlay video modes, which totally fucked over anyone writing Winamp visualizers or any other software using overlay technology.


Much simpler than what I thought, 😂 My idea was using m1n1 + some uefi files with the dsdt tables of the bios + chainloading into some kind of uefi aware bootloader lile grub but I lacked the skills to do it. Now you could make windows arm boot into apple virtualization framework since it only lacks a proper uefi. Apple only let linux macos run in it, no BSDs no windows. But I figure it can be done with the proper skills. From running armbian one can see it is just a generic arm vm using RedHats virtio for most of it.


Awesome video Enderman! <br>Keep going! ❤❤❤


i have actual IA32 hardware :3

i agree it's super rare and a pain in the butt to get working


I'm actually astonished that it didn't crap out given the fact that on Windows 7 you need CSM enabled or the GPU won't initialize


The \EFI\boot location is actually an EFI spec for bootloaders not an MS one.

@@Endermanch yes but on Linux it's actually /boot/efi/EFI/boot because /boot/efi just gets you to the partition but the EFI spec states bootloaders need to be stored at \EFI\boot\boot<arch>.efi. Usually on Linux there's an NVRAM entry so the bootloader sits directly in /boot/efi but without that you'd have to have EFI/boot on the end

@@Endermanch /efi/ is a valid, new esp mount point on linux, /boot/efi/ is a legacy/historical one and is discouraged
#check wiki-archlinux-org/title/EFI_system_partition#Mount_the_partition (4.1 Typical mount points) -> note


I’m honestly surprised he doesn’t get views anymore 😢 what happened?


install windows 7 in uefi with no csm + nvme disk<br>thats a challenge from me!!! hope you make video about this because installing windows 7 in uefi no csm and nvme disk is pretty hard so goodluck enderman!! :)

install windows 7 in uefi with no csm + nvme disk
thats a challenge from me!!! hope you make video about this because installing windows 7 in uefi no csm and nvme disk is pretty hard so goodluck enderman!! :)


Why don't you make a video on swapping the Windows XP explorer with Longhorn's

because Samuka did it with patching files for Shothorn Project


I actually have a windows xp media center 2005 pc!


IA32 isn't Itanium. IA32 means Intel Architecture 32, or more commonly, x86. Itanium is a much later architecture, that was in fact, built on 64-bit.


please STOP Noisy background music Uggh!


finally, We don't switch no more, screw ? microsoft


Hi, can you please try install and boot windows 8.1 x64 on 32bit UEFI but with 64bit processor? I have such a tablet and many apps are now 64bit only.


Fuck me, I read it as XP on UEFN... Great vid as always tho!


hey there was a another windows xp actually its windows xp lost edition wiches windows xp 64 bit edition only had the aero edition no windows media player  no lunar theme no  classic theme just aero theme you cant even run on your pc or as virtual machine its impossible. i know the lost edition the end...


I hope someone makes a Windows XP ISO with all of this UEFI booting stuff built in.


i just realized you are doing "daily upload december"


these are some juicy daily videos if you ask me 🎉


(3:24/3:25) - Hey, you forgot to censor the inappropriate parts of the lyrics!


Does anyone know what the screwed video output was all about? I had it in a linux machine and I never figured out why.


It's great you started making more videos today, why did you take a break?

YouTube being absolutely stupid with treating Enderman is my guess.

Why are you not liking my comment Enderman why does always shit go wrong.@@myk1_sp

@@myk1_spmore like people so fatherless they spend their time massreporting a channel thats actually good like enderman and youtube doesnt care one bit


This idea is Daniel Myslivets but this video is also cool🤑


Please, make one for windows 7!!! I bought an HP dr1072ms, and it came with windows 10. I NEED windows 7 on it, but it came with a UEFI class 3 bios so no csm for me. Also, I really like windows 8.1 too, but even though I tried to install  it, it didn't work, since it gave me a BSOD. I love windows 7 and 8.1. After installing windows 7, it freezed, but on windows 8.1 it kept on bootlooping with a BSOD saying INTERNAL_POWER_ERROR. Please help fix it


I am now one step closer to reviving an old laptop of mine that runs on EFI.


Geez, who would have thought you could get WinXP on UEFI? This is not Windows 7 on UEFI! 👀👀


What's next? Windows in a linux partition scheme?

NTDev did a video doing just that with 10 running from Btrfs


enderman i really like your vidoes but when i tried that windows 10 taskbar method on my laptop wihch it runs windows 11 version 23h2 the file explorer keeps crashing after doing an sfc /scannow i got back the standard windows 11 taskbar any solution please (sorry for bad english)

Yes. Don't run sfc after modding system files. Duh.

i mean i run sfc bcs the taskbar was crashing on me so i run it to restore the original file explorer@@southernflatland


5:27 can’t you have changed the os VMware should virtualise for windows 8


I managed to transfer windows 7 x64 to an external disk, using wintohdd just today 5 may 2024. next time: days/or months I want to succeed in transferring windows xp or even windows 98 to another disk, with same way!


You could try older Intel Macs. Then has intels 32-bit EFI boot well before UEFI WITH PCs


I'd like to see WinXP partitoned as any *nix OS, small boot partiton (FAT32 for UEFI), and root partiton (NTFS) for the rest.


a intel compute stick or some cheap pc with a intel atom usually run IA32 uefi, i have a lenovo miix 300-10IBY that has a IA32 uefi


I have a spare AMD E2 laptop and I'm installing Windows 7 just for the heck of it, tried XP but lsass always crashed, just for experimenting how usable would it be,  laptop was released in 2017 and came preinstalled with 10 so 7 support was not even in mind the only driver that works out of the box is the audio and usb2


Tip: when you do it on real hardware, use x64 xp


please i beg you do windows 7 on uefi no csm i really need it i want to install windows 7


Some old Macs from around 2006 have a 32 bit UEFI with a 64 Bit CPU


next video: installing windows xp on a uefi-compatible nuclear reactor


5:15 why just not change OS in settings virtual machine and not install efi?


you are the only one that can entertain me on this app


If you want to run XP on UEFI change the EFI into IDE in the BIOS.


Reading "CSM" in Spanish improves the title 200% 😂


The black screen may be the Windows Boot Manager, as you set your timeout for 30 secs (mentioned in 3:53)


hrm i think my 2006 imac might be 32bit uefi, though you can get xp working on that with bootcamp, maybe that just switches to legacy boot or something


Have you said that Windows XP Media Center supports UEFI, or did I read it wrong? Can I install a virtual machine with this operating system?


I was thinking older windows in uefi, at the same time. Now you try windows vista in uefi


it is possible to make Windows XP installer using Windows Vista or 7 or maybe 10/11 setup?


This trick sadly doesn't work for windows 7, since the only version that existed for UEFI was 32 bit architecture sadly


I plan to install windows xp on a VM, then ghost them, and take the ghost file to add to the partition on the real hard drive, then use easyBCD to create a boot.

Is it possible?

Because if I install it the normal way it will get BDOS because it's not an IDE drive (maybe)


Dear Enderman. Thank you for the Video. DO you believe that there is a way to make possible boot windows 7 x86 in uefi mode using the 7850 uefi files? Thank you


For 32 bit efi i think there's intel core duo macs


How about the Mac Pro1,1 and 2,1? I thought they had 32bit EFI that’s why it only officially supported Mac OS X 10.7.5


pls enderman fix all the bsod`s to allow any modern computer to run windows xp. not only your own devices PLSSSS ;-;


The enderman loves the pumpkin ❤❤😍😍❤♥🤣🤣🤣


You can also use rufus software i think so but i will try it😊


can you please list every music you used in video in description?


Bro you are so good in pc 👍 and me my pc can't install windows 7 uefi because same crash as windows vista at the start .


Hey, this could be helpful for Michael MJD so he could natively install XP on his 1st gen apple tv!<br>Or perhaps, maybe not.

Hey, this could be helpful for Michael MJD so he could natively install XP on his 1st gen apple tv!
Or perhaps, maybe not.


Hey, hi i am excited to know if you can distribute the x64 iso of this. And is it possible to dual boot the uefi version of this with Windows 10 as i have a new chipset (intel i3 8th gen)


I had a eufi laptop and let me just say it had 1366x768 it was torture running uefi vms inside VMware


If you want, the mac mini from 2006 had a 32 bit uefi and 64 bit core 2 duo, if soomeone needs it, it has the great mac shitty bootloader crap, but you can boot normaly if you have the right iso and stuff


I have a laptot with a bios option saying "Support uefi boot (experimental)". Could that be 32-bit uefi? As I was able to install uefi systems on it before, but now it just says as if it didn't support it. (edit: The uefi systems on that laptop also took a long time to boot.)


It is possible to made a Windows XP installation which run on UEFI, not need to change like this?


He is a hacker with older windows and this cool.


wow i did no know that you could do this no CSM


Maybe try on your old Lenovo laptop that can run also Windows 98?


First few macs after apple switched to intel have 32bit efi's.


next video idea: restrict access to windows 10 c drive


I like your video can make something wow in windows is good👍


Wait, what’s the difference between this and NTDEV’s video


How do i use this to dualboot it with windows 11?


This still needs csm on motherboard to be done ? and then later you can switch back to uefi!


I assume it still can't be installed on a gpt disk though?


VMware, VirtualBox and QEMU are no pure UEFI, they have Int10h (fake)<br>On real UEFI 32-bit hardware in pure UEFI (CSM disabled) you will not boot WinXP because GPU use GOP firmware. Same WinXP 64-bit on pure UEFI 64-bit - a special loader is needed 🙂

VMware, VirtualBox and QEMU are no pure UEFI, they have Int10h (fake)
On real UEFI 32-bit hardware in pure UEFI (CSM disabled) you will not boot WinXP because GPU use GOP firmware. Same WinXP 64-bit on pure UEFI 64-bit - a special loader is needed 🙂

Isn't it possible to display video after boot using VBEMP? Once you get past the boot stage where GOP is used

@@Endermanch Virtual machines, e.g. VMware, do not have a GOP only Int10h (fake) and there you only need GPU driver from VMware Tools<br>A real PC pure UEFI has a GOP and there you need a special loader, e.g. UefiSeven which creates Int10h (fake) + VBEMP vga.sys

@@Endermanch Virtual machines, e.g. VMware, do not have a GOP only Int10h (fake) and there you only need GPU driver from VMware Tools
A real PC pure UEFI has a GOP and there you need a special loader, e.g. UefiSeven which creates Int10h (fake) + VBEMP vga.sys


Intel macs from 2006-2007 have 32-bit efi.


this maybe sound stupid why dont try to get a wim image of windows xp and try to inject in a windows 11 installer


can you do it using multi partition approach?


How install on New laptop with UEFi and NVMe disk


I saw Rectify11 problem right in the thumbnail!


Next up: installing Windows 95 on a microwave screen


I can't deal with the annoying music without narration!


Hmm. I think an Apple TV 1st gen running Windows XP would be possible


if you like older operating systems and cant install it without this method


What If I Install VEGAS Pro 17.0 In Windows Longhorn?


What about using GRUB for this poor xp install


next Video: Running Vista Beta 2 on UEFI


no one noticed that the name was Twitter and not X


Can someone just put all of this into a iso and put it on the internet archive so that we can install windows XP 32 bit UEFI and windows XP x64 UEFI on a machine or virtual machine?


I will make my Celeron N4020 run this operating system

@Неизвестная_Фуджейра


There is no such thing as Itanium 32, IA32 is the intel name for 32bit x86.


can you make a video where you uninstall all bing search and make the default to google? in windows 11 im tired of gettings bing stuff i hate bing and want to change it to google on MY computer like why when i use windows search bar it has to be BING who likes bing anyway and why cant i change it on MY computer this is why i hate windows


Can you boot windows XP on uefi using Limine bootloader?


nice work bit i have a qustion how to inatal window xp in external hard drve wintogo


next video can you install windows with vmware drivers on real hardware?


"UEFI isn't faster than legacy in terms of booting speed" just got proven once again.


¿can you rebuild a windows 7 with uefi suport?


This might’ve been crazy, but UEFI Should get the job done, although it’s very buggy.


Next video: Windows 7 running on a chromebook, 10 or 11 is too easy, just follow a simple guide, your done.

More details, all that exists for an alterative bios (cuz yes thats the best way) is a UEFI with no CSM bios. You can technically use a BIOS (legacy bios) But it's the one that came with the ChromeOS BIOS, and is terrible, as they only need enough to get ChromeOS to boot, not windows. I got to somewhere one time (windows 7 setup) but gave up after I realized I had no keyboard, no usb, or anything else. Windows 10 and 11 (and 8) are too easy because they have UEFI. I've done my experimenting on a HP Chromebook 11 G3.


isn't there an x64 windows xp? i remember having windows xp with 64 bit instr. set , that should make your life easier maybe?

being x64-compatible is different from being uefi-compatible, though lol


Teach us how to get rid of Memez virus on Windows 11.


I need to Try this on the 1st Gen Apple TV which has a 32 Bit EFI and no CSM module in it with the Perfect Hardware for XP.

Not gonna work without serious hacking. The Apple TV will only load one efi file and that is the macOS loader(which will load the macOS kernel and the driver cache). Maybe windows can run if someone puts in the effort to write a special chainloader that replaces the macOS kernel like it was done with linux

@@Notevenmad955 i mean, you can Already Launch grub that way, maybe that could load the EFI File of Windows. Sadly the IDE connector on my Apple TV broke when replacing the cable and XP Boot from USB is Not reliable...


No systems before windows longhorn had UEFI even beta and windows 2000 has an compute different boot loader


You know what stuff is used as Csm files?

(W__ __ ______)

You know what stuff is used as Csm files?

(W__ ____ ______)


2:37 Incorrect, UEFI supports many filesystems. FAT32 is just the only one that the spec requires. Many BIOSes have additional support for NTFS (Some Windows machines), HFS+ (Apple), or others! Rufus has a tool called UEFI:NTFS that you can put on a FAT32 boot partition to make the NTFS partition bootable.

"EFI encompasses the use of FAT32 for a system partition, and FAT12 or FAT16 for removable media. The FAT32 system partition is identified by an OSType value other than that used to identify previous versions of FAT. This unique partition type distinguishes an EFI defined file system from a normal FAT file system. The file system supported by EFI includes support for long file names."

Support of anything else is vendor-specific, but can be added. That's a rare case, and just a nitpick more than anything. FAT32 is in 99% of the times the only way to go. This is the reason why Rufus has to create a separate FAT partition to boot NTFS, that's not NTFS support.


@user-je4dh9js1d i have 10th gen i3 i inserted drivers for usb 3.1 and m2 driver but it dont work


Why I think that CSM means a rudeness from Chile?


i literally just installed windows xp wtf


who agrees that Enderman is smarter than VMware<br>👇

who agrees that Enderman is smarter than VMware
👇


Am I invisible to the comments? HELLO? HELL-OOH?

@Aperture2 aperture scirnce
we do what we must, because we can
for the good of all of us
except the ones who are dead
but theres no sense crying over every mistake
you just keep on trying till you run out of cake
and the science gets done and you make a neat gun
for the people who are still alive


and now, is it possible to run Windows under Windows XP with UEFI boot?


Now that you've done XP with UEFI, how about Windows 7 with UEFI? 👀

UEFI support is available since Vista SP1, of course Windows 7 support UEFI.

@@StarsOfPleiades I tried installing Windows 7 on my HP 14-G102AU which supports UEFI, it refused to boot to the installer. Do you have any solution?

Edit: I tried UefiSeven before. It works, but I can't seem to install the display driver. Does anyone know how to fix this?

@@loominatrx How new the display driver(and what vendor), Nvidia's newest drivers at least(from their own website) require you to enable testsigning since Microsoft refused to certify newer drivers on 7

@@Notevenmad955 I tried the latest AMD driver which was released in 2021, didn't work. I also tried the old driver (released in 2015) that I found on HP's website, but it still didn't work.

@@StarsOfPleiadeswindows vista or windows 7 UEFI requires CSM enabled (with boot control UEFI or UEFI and legacy and pcie need legacy option rom support)
Then it can boot via efi and gpt partitioning
But this is not 100% efi, graphics still under legacy

@@Notevenmad955I used 2020 drivers and still didn't work on my end


that resolution issue is normal even in win10 in uefi


time to break 70th comment. no more 69 :(


FUCK YEH! NOW THIS IS EROTIC! LEGACY MODE FUCKIN SUCKS! BURN IT DOWN


Most chinese tablets with 16GB storage and 1GB of ram with windows 10 have 32-bit uefi and are using BOOTIA32.EFI binaries. Examples are Lark 7i win, Lark 8i win and similar

You can also probably setup 32-bit DUET on legacy BIOS machine as its using the same OVMF code as VMs


I've waiting for this, I try it on my real system(secondary partition) well it kinda works i was able to boot to windows xp but i got stuck on black screen and never go process to destination(The VGA is disable and integrated with the gpu driver using sysprep in vmware and capture the souce dir from vdmk and convert to install.wim) i think i will just try another method but good video anyways