"I assert my right to remain silent" and then opens up like a leaky faucet


is it legal to continue the interogation when the suspect asks for the lawyer? she did ask and the interogation continued

This was in Canada, not the USA. They have different laws.


There is a special place in hell reserved for people who injure and/or murder children…I suppose it’s fitting that men and woman who do these things to children receive special treatment from other prisoners in jail.


In the UK, we have a procedure where 'No Comment' can be used to answer questions without predjuice or incrimination. However, the lack of answers or even THE WAY YOU SAY 'No Comment' can still be used against you in court, showing lack of emotion. This woman's attitude can be as incriminating as her words.

They cannot use the "no comment" against you. If you speak to a solicitor they will almost always tell you to say "no comment" to every question apart from your name, d.o.b and address. If you choose to answer their questions they will ask you the same question in numerous ways trying to put words in your mouth, even If they try and tell you that it's your chance to tell your side of the story. Your chance to tell your side of the story is when you go to court.  ALWAYS say "no comment". They cant charge you on the way you say no comment ffs🤦♂

Id assume the same as the us! The judge and jury decide

Kat Larmand you always have the right not to answer a question that can incriminate you.

Adam Lis I live in the uk... I never knew that.. interesting. Regardless our justice system is messed up

@Darkfig Several well covered cases with convictions based purely on what the defendant says to prove innocence, and it was used to convict. Cees B. and Lucia de Berk come to mind. Smart thing is to not say anything at all, this includes not saying no comment. <br>When asked for the password of that encrypted usb stick/laptop/phone, you can either refuse, which means you are guilty because you are not too cooperate with prosecution, while in practice it is seen as documentation so judges often say "give password", or you can give the password and you may or may not have given them the rope to hang you with. I know the UK has or almost has a law (coming up, I should check whether it was put into effect) where any password must given out as it does not fall under the right to remain silent as it is digital documentation (penalty at the time was set at 6 months in the draft), Netherlands has a similar law in the works. Refuse to answer, and go to jail for 3 years. This of course will technically clash with the right not to help prosecution help convict you so we will see what happens.

@Darkfig Several well covered cases with convictions based purely on what the defendant says to prove innocence, and it was used to convict. Cees B. and Lucia de Berk come to mind. Smart thing is to not say anything at all, this includes not saying no comment.
When asked for the password of that encrypted usb stick/laptop/phone, you can either refuse, which means you are guilty because you are not too cooperate with prosecution, while in practice it is seen as documentation so judges often say "give password", or you can give the password and you may or may not have given them the rope to hang you with. I know the UK has or almost has a law (coming up, I should check whether it was put into effect) where any password must given out as it does not fall under the right to remain silent as it is digital documentation (penalty at the time was set at 6 months in the draft), Netherlands has a similar law in the works. Refuse to answer, and go to jail for 3 years. This of course will technically clash with the right not to help prosecution help convict you so we will see what happens.

The US has something like that too. We can choose to "plead the fifth" and not answer. It doesn't always work though, you can be forced to answer

Jame Gumb that’s stupid. There is so much room for manipulating what a defendant says. And if a defendant doesn’t meet what a prosecutor thinks is normal they become guilty.

@Jody Pelupessy I studied law just across the water from the UK, and autism or borderline is of no consequence for if you are guilty or not, just for sentencing. As such, using your right to remain silent, be it saying literally nothing or "geen commentaar", can and will be used against you in any way the prosecutor sees fit. I know Belgium follows similar rules.
Do note however, that your right to remain silent only applies to not having to cooperate with your own prosecution and is not applicable to documentation, just what you say. As in you must hand over your 2nd bookkeeping if asked (they have to find out first), however you are under no obligation to give any explanation as to its contents, sucks for them if they cannot make heads or tails of it.
It would very much depend on what you refuse to comment on or answer to whether or not they take it as a sign of guilt, and a judge may compel you to answer if it is deemed not in the interest of your defence, as in it is not covered by your right not to help prosecution get you convicted.

Negative inferences following no comment interviews are pretty tightly controlled in UK law. I think it would be up to the judge, prosecution and defense to agree on what reports of the no comment interviews could be presented to the jury and what instruction on it they could have, and that would depend on how much additional evidence was present.


i love how we all pretend we’re all true crime specialists bc we watched the nikolas cruz vid Ahahahah


My Lord, she looked at pictures of her dead children, does NOT cry out and turns the page over??!!!!!!  What kind of monster does that??  I would have been hysterical and unable to talk.


This detective basically checked a king piece with a pawn.


"He maintains a very calm disposition, yet manages to superimpose a highly disparaging tone at the same time."<br>....AKA, he has a French accent.

"He maintains a very calm disposition, yet manages to superimpose a highly disparaging tone at the same time."
....AKA, he has a French accent.

@AnnicK Zoloft Bien sur que si, quand même compréhensible désolé

@Hala Salamé Tu n'as donc jamais entendu un fort accent québecois tout simplement.

@AnnicK Zoloft I m French, we do definitely understand Quebec accent lol. It's like being American and understanding a British or Irish accent

@Tom Cole Which is silly and untrue. Montreal, especially the West island, isn't a problem at all for English speaking people. Of course, if you decide to live in the regions, i.e, outside of cities like Montreal, Gatineau or Quebec city, it might be more difficult. But if you try to learn the language, even just a bit, you will find that people will be quite open to you. And even if you don't, they usually will. I think the key is respect. Be respectful and people will be respectful back. Same principle that applies everywhere really... You should visit!

@William Munny And we should nvr forget the ppl that took out 1 of their own Jesus Christ. Amen. It was Caiaphas the leader of jews during Roman occupation who corroborated in killing the blessed holy man, who died to save us all. Caiaphas felt the holy son of God was a threat and used his power to choose Jesus who had not sinned over the Thief?? Very sad the Zionist of Israel today, do not accept they took out 1 of their own. Thy Shall Not Kill Thy Neighbour... So why are the children in the refugee camps in west bank killed every day for throwing stones. Inhumane atrocities occurring in Israel to Palestinians is despicable.

You all have ruined the joke completely.

EGstill85 there is apparently. Maybe not obvious unless you are one or the other🤷🏽♀

PMSL griffin kelly we DONT WANT MURDERESSES

@Ophélie He got that Celine accent! I dont know much Bout French or French canadian but i  knew that wasnt a french accent. It almost sounded like this dude was from South America..

Pete Olivarez well you know doz guys dere av art.

Tom Cole the queb mentality goes further than just language. My sister went to McGill and anytime she came home she was complaining about how quebs act.

EGstill85 Parisians would have to have subtitles on Queb French because of how different the dialects are. I’m not even kidding about the subtitles part

@Tom Cole bruh... we litteraly spend most of our day spitting words in English and interacting with English ppl, we don't care if you don't speak our language but if you live in Quebec we prefer you adapt to the language ☺

I'm European,English being my sec.language.Was taught French & German since age 13/14,also went to France on several occasions as a kid.Later went to attend campus in Canada,and that's when it hit me.French Canadian seemed very different to me.So did American English & Canadian English BTW.Capabale of telling the difference within a couple of weeks or so.

Lmaooo dont do my boy like this hes not actually french he doesnt deserve this

Hilarious comment; a ton of anal literalists in these comments don’t understand comedy doesn’t have to be true at all to be funny.

@Griffin Jelly Good fuckin luck if you cant fluently speak French, most French Canadians have a reputation of being rather unwelcoming to people that dont speak the language.

EGstill85 Yeah, its basically two different accents. French Canadian accent is more... farm like Id say.

@Griffin Jelly The weed in Quebec isn't bad (Jean Guy is excellent) but nothing compares to the waking euphoria that is BC bud.

@EGstill85 the Quebec accent can be so thick that french people wont understand a word of what a canadian french is saying, and at the very least the accent is very recognizable.

Calling someone from Quebec "French" is like calling an American "English"

@Nicole McCarty ☺ Nothing personal! I know this is a very widespread misconception and when a concept gets passed around too much for too long, it becomes an accepted "truth". Quebecers were for a long time poorer and uneducated so it was easy to label them as people who "can't even speak their own language". I'm not sure exactly where this notion originated but those were less "politically correct" times. Our cousins in central France think that Quebecois is old fashioned and endearing but they would never say our French is not real. But English speaking people have the notion that Quebecois is not real French. We all came from France by boat, and the language came with us! A huge part of our cultural heritage and we are defending it vigorously.

@FrenchCanuck79 I'm sorry....I apologize for posting misinformation about the dialect, I did so in my ignorance....thanks  for the correction....I will go look up the information you suggested ! 😊

@EGstill85 see my comment, it will answer your question. Yes it's the exact same language. When written, you couldn't tell the difference.

Low key want to move to a French province(from USA) just for the accent and weed going to miss my CONSTITUTION THO MY GUY

Drew... that was seriously hilarious man.

MateDrinker33 lol. So, when speaking French, do French Canadians and let’s say Parisians sound very different in the way of word pronunciation and putting emphasis on different syllables even though they are speaking the same tongue? <br>Is it similar to the way Mexican and Spanish people both speak the same language, but have their own twist on certain phrases and pronunciation? Back like 15 years ago, I remember watching a Spanish film and never having heard Spanish people speak prior to that time, I kept wondering why the casting director hires and entire cast with heavy lisps. It was an indie film, so I thought it was an artistic choice or something hahaa

MateDrinker33 lol. So, when speaking French, do French Canadians and let’s say Parisians sound very different in the way of word pronunciation and putting emphasis on different syllables even though they are speaking the same tongue?
Is it similar to the way Mexican and Spanish people both speak the same language, but have their own twist on certain phrases and pronunciation? Back like 15 years ago, I remember watching a Spanish film and never having heard Spanish people speak prior to that time, I kept wondering why the casting director hires and entire cast with heavy lisps. It was an indie film, so I thought it was an artistic choice or something hahaa

He has a French Canadian accent, not a French accent. They are two different things.

He doesn't have a French accent, they're very different.

That's actually a French Canadian accent. As with the contrast between South African and British English, the actual French spend way less time speaking through their nose.

Great comment. Seriously. Made me smile.


Aaand it's stories like this that lead me to believe a psychological evaluation prior to couples and would-be single parents getting pregnant would decrease the rate of infanticide via parent.

...along with other issues such as abuse and neglect.


13:47 Me every time, trying to tell a joke to my CO-workers


Thank you again for the Canadian content!


Why does everyone in the comments say she only got 10 years when she actually got a life sentence?


This interrogator is like a mill stone. Sloooowly grinding her down.

He sounded SO turned on at getting to bully her around, it's disgusting.

Slowly? SLOWLY? He's literally showing her pictures of her dead children like 10 minutes into the video.

@LeeLew Dee SHE WAS INVOLVED AND THERES A GLIMPSE OF HER ON THE NEIGHBORS CAMERA!!! A D CHRIS SAID MORE THAN ONCE DONT DRAG HER INTO THIS....(Chris Watts gf)

The police are so good at that part of job....there so much psychology that goes into inter viewing and interrogating!!!

I mean he didn't really accomplish anything. She stuck to her lawyer's advice and didn't talk for the most part

@Daly Shorts Can you link that video or remember who made it?

So is she just pretending she doesn't believe they are dead so she doesn't have to explain why she has no emotional response to their deaths?  I have been more upset than this over the death of one of my little dogs and these are her children!  If you look up the words "cold" and "heartless" I'm betting you will see her picture.  I am unfamiliar with this case so I can see that I'm going to have to do some research to get "the rest of the story" as Paul Harvey used to say.

One of the best in the world is Det Sergeant Jim Smyth.<br>I always joke that Jim Cant Swim (JCS) is actually Det. Jim Smyth himself. Lmao

One of the best in the world is Det Sergeant Jim Smyth.
I always joke that Jim Cant Swim (JCS) is actually Det. Jim Smyth himself. Lmao

Gal, idk what else to say other than...that picture of yours is pure GOLD. In more ways than one. 😁

The interrogation of Chris Watts was incredible to watch. They have this down to a science. They knew exactly what to do/say and when to do it. It's insane to see how they can basically control a person thoughts by using psychological methods. I watched a breakdown of his interrogation that explained exactly what techniques they were using and how they work

Right? And he, like so many other interrogators featured on this channel, makes it look easy. The video often focuses on the criminal breaking down over time, but don't forget that the interrogator also had to sit there for hours and hours and HOURS on end, talking to a brick wall essentially.

I would lose my shit if I had to do his job. Even if I had the endurance (I don't), I would probably end up questioning whether or not it's working. "Am I saying the right things? Should I change tactics? I wanna go home. Why am I even doing this? She's not budging anyway, oh Lord help me" 😂 Huge kudos to those who are strong enough to do this for the right reasons :)

Right? And he, like so many other interrogators featured on this channel, makes it look easy. The video often focuses on the criminal breaking down over time, but don't forget that the interrogator *also* had to sit there for hours and hours and HOURS on end, talking to a brick wall essentially.

I would lose my shit if I had to do his job. Even if I had the endurance (I don't), I would probably end up questioning whether or not it's working. "Am I saying the right things? Should I change tactics? I wanna go home. Why am I even doing this? She's not budging anyway, oh Lord help me" 😂 Huge kudos to those who are strong enough to do this for the right reasons :)


How’s it a life sentence if it’s just 10 years with possibility of parole


I clicked on this video randomly as I have been going through this channel's back-catalogue and as soon as the interrogator spoke, I knew this was to be set in Quebec lmao.


I was minding my own business but then decided to watch 5 minutes of a video named "How pretending to be crazy looks like"


Parole after only 10 years?! Outrageous!


Is anyone else shocked at just how cool this 'thing' was during the interview? <br>And to see her have little to no reaction when shown the photograph of those poor children? So cold and heartless. Just a nasty, vile oxygen waster.

Is anyone else shocked at just how cool this 'thing' was during the interview?
And to see her have little to no reaction when shown the photograph of those poor children? So cold and heartless. Just a nasty, vile oxygen waster.


If I ever get caught up for something having these videos in my viewing history is not gonna look good for me.


little did they know, it was all just a big april fool’s prank


I have been guided to this masterpiece of a YouTube channel by the legendary video "What  pretending to be crazy looks like"


Couldnt this method end up getting false confessions though?


All she had to do was say " April Fools" at the end and be done with it!  Anybody get it??


JSC we have all binge watched every episode we demand more


There’s people cutting there heads off on here and they delete his videos ??


I want to take a moment to compliment the narrator. I’ve seen many of these same interrogations and none of them are as riveting and enthralling as these. The reason being; the great narration. The information as well as the voice is always great to listen to with just the right amount of spooky vibes, unbiased information, and legal pertinence. Always such a great job. Throw a heart ❤ on this comment if you receive it.

I thumbs’d you down because you asked for likes


A JCS I haven’t seen!!? Oh, this is going to be good..

Right??? I thought I’ve watched all his videos at least twice, where did this video come from??


so nobody believes she was setup? and doesnt say anything because shes afraid for her life or rest of family? ex just happens to die from poisoning too?


Huh, the description says the interrogation was on March 31 2009, although the tape says April 1 2009.

Either this was all one big eleborate April Fools prank gone wrong, or it was started towards midnight.


How did this guy get popular overnight?? It’s crazy


Wait so she got a lesser sentence than her ex boyfriend??<br>What

Wait so she got a lesser sentence than her ex boyfriend??
What


talk about guilty until proven innocent - this is a pretty pathetic justice system


I thought they couldn't continue without your lawyer.


The husband killed himself out of guilt... that’s sad.

@Nothing_Much She was given a <b>life sentence.</b> Parole requires approval, and there's no chance they'll sympathize with a child killer. The only reason she was given the "possibility" is because of the charge.

@Nothing_Much She was given a *life sentence.* Parole requires approval, and there's no chance they'll sympathize with a child killer. The only reason she was given the "possibility" is because of the charge.

I honestly don’t think it was revenge. Maybe she just didn’t want to do it alone. His failed drug operation in this big ass house I know the bills had to be expensive. If you look at crime scene photos they had a hyperbaric chamber and nice furniture. Getting comfortable maintaining a certain lifestyle and boom that’s gone. That could be rough? <br>I’m in no way agreeing with her, but I didn’t see this as revenge. She did try to kill herself afterwards, although I didn’t hear of other attempts.

I honestly don’t think it was revenge. Maybe she just didn’t want to do it alone. His failed drug operation in this big ass house I know the bills had to be expensive. If you look at crime scene photos they had a hyperbaric chamber and nice furniture. Getting comfortable maintaining a certain lifestyle and boom that’s gone. That could be rough?
I’m in no way agreeing with her, but I didn’t see this as revenge. She did try to kill herself afterwards, although I didn’t hear of other attempts.

She is now a family annihilator, because All members are dead because of her(actions) and only her, no?

@Chris M shes only out on bail during her appeal.  She’s not out out.  Stop saying that.

guardians animal rescue/ state certified 501c3

Most likely a mix of sorrow over the girls and the smuggling investigation that exposed a risky rabbit hole that would continue to land a lot of crime members in hot water. Either way, the dude knew shit was getting messy and handled it. Such is the life of crime.

He probably did it to cause her even more pain an act of mercy maybe, she clearly did it for revenge on him so he did it for revenge on her, now she has to live with the fact that the man she loved she’s indirectly killed and she’s the cause of that, she’ll have to live with that for the rest of her life.

Oh please, he all of a sudden felt guilt while locked up, but never felt that much guilt in all the time he abandoned his family?

Why the KIDSSS? Their Kids. Just Kids Again if you don’t want your kids PUT THEM FOR ADOPTION. Murder needs to stop, there are many other desperate solutions than that.

If it's true, then she got what she wanted. But, part of me feels like no one ever retires alive from the mafia.

@Jolanta Olek actually that's true. The police murdered this family

Thats sad also because she will be happy and satisfied , after all she did it for revenge

He was more likely killed by drug mafia<br>.

He was more likely killed by drug mafia
.

@DeuceGenius so it's all police's fault. This family would've been rich and happy by now. (sarc)

She got what she wished for. Special place in hell for these people. I hope she's ready.

im sure it was revealed that they thought her motivation was to hurt him forever for revenge. he didnt have to live his life in pain. she didnt get her revenge. maybe thats part of the reason he did it..  she killed her own kids for nothing, and hes dead too.  she deserves it. she destroyed all of their lives. if i was alone with her in that interrogation room after seeing the pictures you would see me on the next episode.     wonder what would have been different if the police didnt sieze his retirement plan and he didnt go into hiding.

Nothing_Much exactly. Very sad. It’s like he also took on her share of responsibility.

That’s absolutely heart breaking, yet this woman is still alive and is eligible for parol in 9 years...


And just how many hours is it OK to do this? People cry when terrorists get interrogated BUT jump up and cheer when it is done to a citizen


Props to JCS although this is a tragic story with no winners.


every episode of this i watch the more i hate the police

its disgusting to treat anyone like this, i don't care what they've done. she was coerced into talking, deprived of sleep (& food) and her basic wishes (let me go back to my cell, i want to sleep, etc.) were brushed aside like she wasn't a person.

her right to remain silent is not being respected at all. this is blatantly unethical


This would be one hell of an April Fool's Day joke!!!


I find this woman to be very cold. I watched this a long time ago. Very eager to hear your opinions on her behavior!<br>    Thanks again for another great video!

I find this woman to be very cold. I watched this a long time ago. Very eager to hear your opinions on her behavior!
    Thanks again for another great video!


when he said april fool’s day i thought they were going to release her with laughter and stuff


You have a lot of imitators, but your channel remains the best.


14:50 man had no chill... "Today is the first of April, you seem to think its April fools day" haha


And to think this woman is out of prison while she awaits her appeal after being found guilty. Something is seriously wrong here

@Simpicus Maximus I was thinking about Ben Franklin saying "Better 100 guilty go free than 1 innocent be punished".

If we lived by that as a country, we would empty our jails tomorrow. Most estimated out it at 3 to 10 percent of our inmates are actually innocent. Somewhere around 1 in 20, so 500% worse than what Ben was referring to.

Looking at it that way, and thinking about what would happen if we released our entire prison population...life is messy and full of shitty choices isn't it?

@pdorism Also, to run with your car analogy, this would be like complaining to a mechanic that your car is too expensive to refuel and you want him to fix it and make it so that it doesn't burn any fuel any more.

Burning fuel (gasoline, electricity, hydrogen, propane, natural gas etc) is an unfortunate by product of what needs to happen for the car to be useful. The mechanic can't invent perpetual motion, so you complaining about the car being too expensive to drive due to fuel consumption, isn't going to be fixed. If the car doesn't use fuel, zero work gets done.

Now, the mechanic might recommend changing your driving habits to get better mpg. They might recommend buying a hybrid or riding the bus or other options to reduce the fuel cost. But in the end, you will always need to consume energy to do the work of traveling somewhere.

The justice system is the same. It has the unfortunate feature of being run by humans, who make mistakes. In order to convict thousands of criminals for horrible acts and make sure that those people are taken off the streets, there will always be the unfortunate byproduct of convicting some innocent people and letting some guilty walk free. The only way I see to get to zero innocent people being in jail is to not convict anyone at all. And the only way to get every criminal would be to jail absolutely everyone who had even the slightest chance of committing the crime.

Geniuses of every generation, stretching back thousands of years, have tried to figure out better ways. The current system is where we are at right now, and hopefully we will continue to get better in the future. Hopefully we invent new tech (that is allowed in court) that helps reduce errors. But there will always be some corruption, there will always be somebody who covers for a buddy, or a rich asshole who can buy their way out, or a racist cop who plants evidence.

So, your snide little comment of "they need to work on that" sounds just as insane and out of touch with reality as the person demanding the mechanic 'fix' their car so that it doesn't burn fuel anymore.

@pdorism  @pdorism  And what I'm trying to point out is that:
A) Pointing out a problem that everyone can see serves no purpose. We all see it. We know it exists. Bitching about it while offering no solutions, while also implying that this problem is apparently so easy to fix that it should have been addressed by now...this does nothing but serve as a spring board to feed your own ego. You feel like you've accomplished something because you've gone out and 'taken a stand' and called for this massive inequity to be fixed. Well, good job. You haven't added anything new to the discussion though. What you've done is the equivalent of walking up to the scene of a car wreck and say "Somebody was probably speeding weren't they. That's why people are getting hurt because people don't obey the rules and they don't pay attention when driving. You all need to do something about that."
Well no shit. Thanks for the input. Which leads the second part if this.

B) Your basic complaint comes down to humans not being perfect. I agree with the basic issue we are discussing here. 3 to 10% of our prisoners actually being innocent is appallingly. But why does it happen? It happens because people suck. People aren't perfect. Sometimes it's a racist cop. Sometimes it's someone being hung over on the job and forgetting to take a dna swab that would have proven innocence. Sometimes it's just shear bad luck and all the evidence looks really really bad and points to an innocent person...just out of sheer stupid chance. You basically want us to 'fix humanity'. THAT is the source of the majority of these issues.
So you're on hear bitching about how bad thr system is (which everyone knows) complaining about how terrible it is that the guilty Sometimes walk and the innocent Sometimes end up on death row (which everyone knows and agrees with). And you're offering zero solutions....just standing on your soap box demanding someone do something to fix it so that, somehow, the basic fact that humans make mistakes is removed from our judicial system.

Are you also asking that someone do something about the racism that puts thousands of people in prison every year? How far will typing out these demands on YouTube get you to a better world.

You haven't informed anyone of anything new. You haven't offered any concrete ideas to try. The best you've offered is "maybe they should work on that" when told that they don't always know who is guilty or innocent.

Well no shit, they DO work on that. Here's the problem...guilty people lie. Did you know that? They can also refuse a lie detector, they can refuse to talk, they can literally just sit in a jail cell and not say a word for years. Forcing the state to do all the legwork of putting together an air tight case.

The state has to build a case against them, and that case is built by imperfect humans. Humans who are distracted because their wife just got diagnosed with cancer. Or humans who have a headache but came into work anyway. Or maybe one of the state's witnesses turns out to be a crazy person who just loves attention, and halfway through their testimony the defense proves that this person is not credible and the prosecution's case falls apart. Once the suspect is acquitted they can not be charged again with the same crime.

The case has to be strong enough that potentially killing the accused person, or locking them up for 20 or 30 years, seems like a good, fair and just idea.

You must be 12 years old if you really think this is so easy. Or, you've lived a sheltered life and never actually faced a massive and complex issue where people's lives and the lives of their family are on the line.

I guarantee that if you ended up on trial as an innocent person and the state put together a "pretty good" case against you, but not bullet proof, you would be DEMANDING that you be freed.

Conversely, if someone in your family had a crime committed against them, and the state put together a "pretty good" case against a suspect, you would be DEMANDING that they convict.

Life is messy and terrible. But yeah...maybe they just need to "work on that".

@jasondean88888 it's not my job to fix it. I am just pointing out a problem that anybody can see. Am I not allowed to complain that my car isn't running properly if I'm not a mechanic? Are you really suggesting that it's supposed to suck, or that this is the best we can do?

@pdorism I missed the part where you offered a solution. Where was that?

@jasondean88888 One would think that if the system is run by humans, they should be able to follow common sense. Like, don't let a killer run free just because the judge made a typo. Oh, but they're not at risk of killing again. So what? They still have to be punished! On the other end, if the system is run like a machine, there should be checks and balances and automated processes that prevent these mistakes from happening. What happens in practice is that the worst side of human and machine get combined into a needlessly complicated monstrosity, just so that lawyers can have their job security.

@pdorism We're open to any suggestions on what the perfect legal system (that is run by humans) looks like.

However, most would argue that, since humans are imperfect, any legals system they run will never be perfect.

But you go ahead an impress us and throw out your answer to fixing an issue every democracy in history has struggled with.

@Dr. Anthony Fauci Prime Minister Turdo can always bring a formal apology for her crime.

@Luiz Felipe only 8% of prisons are private in the US. For comparison, 15% are private in the UK. There is no quota the justice system is trying to meet. There is no benefit to a judge to send someone to prison. All a private prison does is lessen the burden on public prisons. While do make profit, they can’t actually force the justice system to send anyone to them.

@Luiz Felipe it's not that improbable look up the Disturban video The Man who killed his family twice, shit is sick but shows exactly how the legal system fails innocent people

@Alexander Erickson its not the worst, but also its not even close to the best

@U - 235 at least in all the other countries the prisons aren't private companies driven on profit, so the Justice system has to feed them suspects like culprits just to keep the quota of people imprisoned

@Eric Cartman you can't say that. what if she gets another husband, makes another `childs` and her husband proceeds to do something so bad that the only option was taking away their `childs`, very improbable, but could happen again.

The only question is that we don't know by the end of the video what her husband did to her, that would be curious knowing.

@mychannel302 it’s because the legal systems in the rest of the world suck just as bad if not worse than Americas. People like to pretend it’s evil America justice system when it’s really all of them

@pdorism So they treat everyone as guilty or innocent because they can't tell.

@pdorism They don't know how to distinguish the guilty from not guilty

Yea. She's got friends in low places. Or high places in this case

@Simpicus Maximus how about punishing the guilty and leaving the innocent alone? Why is that so hard?

I don't like it but I would rather shitty people like her be out on a bond for an appeal than that right of due process taken away for everyone. It's a matter of slippery slope and principle. I don't like it but I understand it

@mychannel302 Casey Anthony is free and has opened a Private Investigation firm

@mychannel302 yeah Karla Homolka was another one that was pretty disturbing

@Dr. Anthony Fauci As an American, I can’t criticize other countries justice system, but this is the fourth case I’ve heard about out of Canada that has me baffled.  Some innocents get treated like garbage there because their killers walk, get let out on bail to kill again, get awarded a lot of money (Omar Kadeem)

Well what did you expect. She is not dangerous of reincidence

@Kimberly L damn we do live in a society :/

from what I understood at the end of the video she got retried in 2019 and got a life sentence? and the narrator says she cannot get out until 2029, I think she's behind bars bro


Am I wrong or when she asked to talk to a lawyer, doesn’t the questioning end?

Not in Canada. She can chose not to answer but they can keep asking questions as long as they want.


14:02 “ITS APRIL FOOOOLLSS HAHA WE TOTALLY GOT YOU!”

14:02 *“ITS APRIL FOOOOLLSS HAHA WE TOTALLY GOT YOU!”*


There are certain people in this world that I look at and wonder if they're not a machine.


Does something, claims that not what she  did. 😂😂😂😂


So many comments think "life sentence with possiblity of parole in 10 years" is lighter than "15 years sentence".


I still blame Luigi...

If only it weren't April Fool's Day.


my first perception, the very first quote :i find it strange you are not upset" i do not know why he does not understand. i am 'CrAzY' diagnosed schizoaffective and i am 100%p&t VA disabled. medically retired at 100% for schizophrenia, depression snd anxiety. i do not understand connecting with my environment psychologically and emotionally. i detach myself from worthless dying critters and other objects. i can be happy in my own death without worry.


I really thought this was all an April fools prank


That feeling when you have the right to remain silent, but not the ability...


If they want to make a movie about her, they could get Sarah Gilbert to play her.


That Detective was wrong in continuing to talk to her. She told him, "my right to remain silent." He should have backed off regardless of the POS that she is.

You have the right to remain silent but that doesn't mean they'll stop the interrogation just because you don't want to talk. And she still talked a lot.


They actually released this monster on July 10, 2020 pending her appeal.  Unbelievable!  "Adele Sorella, who was convicted of murder, is out of prison on a conditional release while she awaits her appeal... The judge released Sorella under the conditions that she put up a $25,000 guarantee, that she doesn't leave her home between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m. and that she does not leave Quebec or apply for a passport."

@Reverend Malice Yup most people believe psychopaths are all murderers when in reality they are bankers, psychologists, salesmen, etc. and I say that as a salesperson, and not because I’ve met any i sales, but because surveys always show this. Nonpsychopaths do commit more nurses a<br>But psychopaths are greatly over represented.

@Reverend Malice Yup most people believe psychopaths are all murderers when in reality they are bankers, psychologists, salesmen, etc. and I say that as a salesperson, and not because I’ve met any i sales, but because surveys always show this. Nonpsychopaths do commit more nurses a
But psychopaths are greatly over represented.

@E Gleaton Well, of course. I'm just saying that people love to jump the gun on psychopathy, so a human who acted natural up to one point and has displayed no psychopathic tendencies gets described later as a psychopath despite there being little to no evidence for that claim except one act they did which was abhorrent. Non-psychopaths also account for FAR more crimes because psychopathy in general is quite rare. I'm not saying either is solely the culprit of crime, mind you, but non-psychopathy is definitely far more prominent in reality while the psychopathy gets misinterpreted in fiction because of how common it is there.

@Reverend Malice Other way around. Crimes can be committed by psychopaths as well as non-psychopaths

@E Gleaton The word "psychopath" gets thrown around a lot, but I don't think it applies in this case at all. In the video, you can clearly tell she reacts and feels guilt when seeing the pictures. A psychopath could see the picture of the scene and remain perfectly stoic and calm. But I guess it's just hard to people to realize that murderers and others who do immoral acts are just as human as anyone else.

The curfew isn’t even a punishment she murdered her children at HOME

@Playable Character women don’t get away with anything if a man is the one making the call. They love to have power over women and love controlling their fates.

@Playable Character its canada bro , women or man, no matter what, killers walk

@ciara hernandez No.   Female privilege.

@ciara hernandez No.   Female privilege.

She's stashed some of that drug money and paid off judges and had her husband killed in prison..

@fox23vaj I am from Europe and our justice systems are designed to enable people who committed a crime to integrate back into society once they've served their sentence. Which I think is a good thing in some cases but I also disagree with that as well. You just have to look at each case individually. In my country a life sentence is 15 years and after that you can file to be released but there are a lot of cases in which people are not allowed to leave. Also I don't know how it works in the US but in Europe to be released people also need to see a therapist on a regular basis and the psychopath criminals get locked up in special facilities from which they are most definitely not released.

Damn. Losing your life life and murderer keeps on living free... Damn that sucks, fffuuu I hate humankind. Sorry to nice people tho ❤

@fox23vaj For the vast majority of European countries, "life imprisonement" means 20-25 years

@Vincent Moon i don't know about you, but i wouldn't want to have a person out free who thinks it's a reasonable decision to murder children to get back at an ex. if her decision making is that poor, what else could she be capable of down the road? it doesn't always have to be this exact situation.

She's not a danger to the public. What's the point of keeping her locked up at taxpayers expense?

@Jamie okay and what's stopping her from losing grip of reality again? did they insert a chip into her brain?

@Entity <br>Yeah some aren't, but most are, definitely WAY more than women.

@Entity
Yeah some aren't, but most are, definitely WAY more than women.

I bet she made an "under the table" deal with the judge

@E Gleaton people come back from temporary rage or insanity. I don't think she's mad. Just bad.

@fox23vaj The judicial systems everywhere are bullshit. Long sentences for seemingly lesser crimes and short sentences for people that the public would hang if given a choice. There should be something in place to hold judges accountable. Or even have a jury pass the sentence. Being female will also lead to a lesser sentence for some reason. The system is seriously flawed.

She needs to stay in prison. horrible excuse for a mother

She's got to live with what she's done in her own head.


Didn't know Georges St-Pierre was a detective as well!


9:30 Shouldn't you guys maybe have blurred out that picture? I can see two dead kids laying on the ground pretty clearly.


Should’ve been reminded that 04/01 is April’s “truth” day you fool !


This channel has over 2 mil subs and so few videos. I''m astonished. This is my favorite channel, hands down. The producer of this channel has not only great insight on the subject at hand but other subjects as well. He once talked about storytelling, It was awhile ago but I think I pertained to screenwriting and movies,. I was blown away by how he explained it. I'd love to hear more from this person, on any subject he's interested in.


This is was my mother means when she says “I brought you into this world, I can take you out” 😀


"Today is the first of April...and you seem to think it's April fool's day"...this has to be the illest slam of the century


started from "what pretending to be crazy looks like" now we're here


The entire time I was thinking "Yeah! Break that woman!"


Why the hell would someone who murdered 2 children in cold blood be able to be released on probation after 10 years? That makes no damn sense.

here's a crazy idea, a justice system that has the goal of reincarceration for their criminals, rather than retributitive justice.

parole... big difference... and for life...

For some reasons the courts always seem to put less value on the lives of children...

I don't understand why countries with much lower crime rate also has much less time sentenced for violent crimes.

I don't understand  why a lot POF countries with much lower crime rate also has much less time sentenced for violent crimes.

It's Canada man. A guy who stabbed me and left me to die got 18 months for aggravated assault and was out 1 year later.
I also know another dude i lived with in a community home when i was 15 that murdered someone 10 years ago who was out in 7 years because he was charged with only manslaughter. (he tied someone up and beat them up while robbing them, and ended up killing them).
This is Canada. Our system is fucking wayyy to lax on violent crime and sex offenders in particular.


Hang on.... "he was found dead in his cell with cyanide in his system - death was ruled a suicide"...... do Canadian cops offer cyanide sandwiches to inmates??


The narrator voice reminds me of that guy doing Amazon finds you may or may not need. I like this, I'm stock in this channel since yesterday.


Investor:“What day is it today?”
Me: “April Fools!”
Investor: “You seem to think it’s April Fools day”
Me:”Yes”


To rob a child of their life should be punishable by death only. It takes a special kind of heartlessness to do what these terrible people do.


Right there at 11:28 you can tell she is mentally exhausted and giving in to the truth..


I can never understand why people being interrogated don't ask for a lawyer immediately, and keep repeating it until the lawyer comes.


Can someone explain to me the law? Does she have to stay there even when she asked for a lawyer? Are required to stay there any amount of time the police wants you to?


She was already released from prison. The courts say she most likely won't be a danger to the public but said before that if she is released, the public will lose trust in the justice system. The justice system here in Canada is a JOKE and I've lost trust. Total bs.


We need this show to give us a new episode at least every month.


She is an evil psychopath. She must never ever get out from prison! What she did makes me very angry!


I got addicted to this youtube channel when i saw the video "What pretending to be crazy looks like" i love this channel


The presentation of a graphic crime scene photograph was frowned upon during the Memphis Three case, yet here it's described as a valid interrogation technique. Why? Although, in the Memphis Three case, Misskelly was on the lower end of the mental spectrum.


When he asked if she knew what day it was, a part of me expected him to blurt "April Fool's!" & start laughing at her.


Its so hard to see such criminals commit heinous crimes and chuck attitude like this and act like she achieved something.


What took a person to behave in such way? 🤷♀


i just realized i had just barely turned 10 years old when the killings took place. mere months older than her 9 year old daughter who she killed. I can't imagine having died in 2009. how horrible


Don't ever talk to the police. Always remeber that "you have the right to remain silent" and that "anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law". Use your 5th amendment. Even this women will walk free again, because of her silence. Cops are not our friends nor our enemies. Cops are not trying incriminated anyone, their job is to find evidence and connect dots. The more you talk, the more data (dots) they have to connect.


It should be standard practice for all new parents to undergo a pysch eval. It should be the fucking law.


"Today is the first of April and you seem to think it's April fools day." fucking madlad


Clearly, someone in custody and being questioned like this should simply say NOTHING AT ALL, not even the smallest peep, and adopt a facial expression like those employed by players of Texas Holdem poker.......that approach would utterly defuse these interrogation tactics.


April 1st, 2009.. i was turning 6 when this woman was interrogated. My mother was hugging me and telling me she loved me. My cake was spongebob. And this woman had just killed her children.. thats insane

Seems odd but happy birthday mine is 2 weeks after yours


Beeing of legal profession but from a jurisdiction where police must not "ignore" the suspect's decision to remain silent, in such a way the narrator states, the interrogation tactic of "fatiguing the suspect to make him/her more open for suggestion", in general, sounds quite ridiculous. In any case and without reference to Mrs. Sorella. I wouldn't be suprised if this leads to a considerable percentage of false confessions. It may hint in a direction with respect to the investigstion of the police, but this direction has to filled with real evidence. However, in any circumstance, the introduction of video footage of such an interrogation in court proceedings, especially in order to derive anything of relevance for conviction, enqueues to the logic of interrogation and decision making methods of the inquisition, roughly speaking. Moreover, reading comments, essentially comparing the suspects actual reaction to questions, accusations, photographs, etc. to how the suspect "should have reacted if innocent", is irretating, at best. While certain conclusions may seem obvious (how an innocent person would behave), they are not compelling and may, in fact, just be the result of the prejugement of one, who felt competent to determine, which reaction should be the  "morally" correct one. Don't get me wrong: Beyond ensuring that a suspect is treated in a manner that upholds basic principles of human dignity, it is not about protecting an actual perpetrator! No justice system of the world aims for this. It is about protecting an innocent, yet wrongfully accused person.<br>Any thoughts? Happy to discuss;)

Beeing of legal profession but from a jurisdiction where police must not "ignore" the suspect's decision to remain silent, in such a way the narrator states, the interrogation tactic of "fatiguing the suspect to make him/her more open for suggestion", in general, sounds quite ridiculous. In any case and without reference to Mrs. Sorella. I wouldn't be suprised if this leads to a considerable percentage of false confessions. It may hint in a direction with respect to the investigstion of the police, but this direction has to filled with real evidence. However, in any circumstance, the introduction of video footage of such an interrogation in court proceedings, especially in order to derive anything of relevance for conviction, enqueues to the logic of interrogation and decision making methods of the inquisition, roughly speaking. Moreover, reading comments, essentially comparing the suspects actual reaction to questions, accusations, photographs, etc. to how the suspect "should have reacted if innocent", is irretating, at best. While certain conclusions may seem obvious (how an innocent person would behave), they are not compelling and may, in fact, just be the result of the prejugement of one, who felt competent to determine, which reaction should be the  "morally" correct one. Don't get me wrong: Beyond ensuring that a suspect is treated in a manner that upholds basic principles of human dignity, it is not about protecting an actual perpetrator! No justice system of the world aims for this. It is about protecting an innocent, yet wrongfully accused person.
Any thoughts? Happy to discuss;)


7:15 what if you stonewall them with requests for coffee and high-protein foods instead? Would that help make things inadmissible for when you eventually got psychologically broken and started talking?


Him: So we think you did it.
Her: Well I didn't do it so.
Him: Well we think you probably did.
It's known as the "probably did do it strategy" in modern psychology.


people who want more of his content simply need to head to his old patreon and there is plenty "new" stuff to discover


Man, life is so murder-free when you don't stress people.


man I just checked her kids picture on google and its just so sad how one of them looked exactly like her mother.


Why I'm on the dark side of YouTube again?! I've been listening to this like horror stories. But this is real, these people exist and many live around us. Terrifying


Spousal revenge filicide? It's disturbing that it happened so many times that there's a term for it.


How can anyone hurt innocent children!!! Especially your own! And she act like she don’t give a fuck. She deserves to rot in jail then hell


Her earliest release would be march of 2029 but if it was a man he would’ve received life without the possibility of parole she was cold hearted and had no remorse yet has a possibility of walking in this world again


I feel like my problems are miniature when I watch this.


OK Jim.  We the people (who are about to quarantined again) DEMAND more videos !


As French Canadian from Montréal , I instantly recognize the French « québécois » accent 😄<br>He did a great job considering how in denial she is …

As French Canadian from Montréal , I instantly recognize the French « québécois » accent 😄
He did a great job considering how in denial she is …


So convicted in 2019, 10 years, out on conditional release July 2020.

This woman is out already

What on earth


Even I struggled to answer the detective through a screen


I understand why this video would make you upset and slightly traumatized, so in a lighthearted attempt at easing the situation, I'd like to point out that: Canada is the only place where the French (Perfectly able to pronounce Croissant) person isn't French".


Why do need so much of evidence when it was so clear .. she called her brother about being suicidal and go to Home only to find dead daughters who were ofcourse alone with her all day and her suicidal car accident attempt

It is all so clear


Just like in Dear Zachary, the judge who set he free on bail should be fired ! Disgusting


The detective should go to prison for his April fools joke


How  was it second 2nd degree murder for  2 of her own kids dying? She poisoned them. Sounds premeditated and should have been 1st degree.


im from quebec, exactly two hours from where this happened, and 1, i can’t believe i new this was from quebec with only the accent the officer in the beginning, and 2, that this happened close to me and that i’ve never hear about it


She was pretty impressive at refusing to talk much.


So last episode I watched dude murdered his ex girlfriend and got 40 years and she just got 10 for murdering 2 lives. What the fuck


im still confused if she had no remorse for killing her own kids with no feelings for them whatsoever wont that make her a sociopath?


i'm so confused i physically cannot understand the motive can someone explain? did she really kill her children to hurt her husband because he, while on the run, lost contact with her? is that? the entire motive?


Soul crushing. Those poor girls. Such senseless evil.


So many high level drug dealers have tragic lives .behind the veneer of glamour they suffer and so do their families.....Hollywood has always glamourized these people .


How long are they allowed to interrogate without a lawyer if they have requisited one?


Is JCS from Canada? Seems like a big coincidence that such a large percentage of his videos are Canadian cases.

Unless Canada has some sort of policy of releasing interrogation footage or something


The interviewer with an accent like a frog that can hardly speak English.... is such an OPPORTUNITY for her to pretend she doesn't understand this strange dialect and should request someone that actually speaks English. Quite frankly, I have to exert too much brain power to comprehend that gibberish.

Him saying she's so calm etc... I'd be like "What? Can you speak proper English? I don't understand the mumbles out of your mouth". In this instance, it would create the illusion that the 'abnormal' behavior of the suspect in question is due to a communications error largely on the part of the interrogator.

Lastly, you NEVER, EVER, go into a police interrogation, without a lawyer. Doesn't matter if you are guilty or not guilty. You don't do it. The police use tactics admissible in court and will try to do ANYTHING to get you to confess or look guilty. It's the largest truth that the cops don't want the truth, they want a closed case and someone in jail. This is literally their job and their career. The more cases they solve the higher they will rank. Yes, this one is guilty but, even if you aren't guilty, you can be made to go to prison on false charges. Just don't risk it. GET A LAWYER. ASK FOR ATTORNEY. SHUT THE FUCK UP UNTIL ATTORNEY IS PRESENT. Even after requesting attorney they will egg you on to spill the beans. This in itself is not illegal. They can interrogate you for HOURS and try to coax a confession or some information that makes you look guilty. JUST SHUT. THE. FUCK. UP. WAIT FOR ATTORNEY. It's just that simple. You can accept your Miranda rights, you can acknowledge basics such as wanting water or food. BUT YOU SAY NOTHING ELSE UNTIL YOUR LAWYER IS THERE. Anything YOU SAY can AND WILL be used AGAINST YOU in the court of law. It simply amazes me how most people that are caught just don't follow those absolutely basic and simple steps. In these interrogation situations without representation, you have everything to lose and absolutely nothing to gain. They will LIE to you saying, if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear. The amount of people falsely imprisoned says, that is a lie. You have everything to fear in this situation regardless of your guilt because the ones interrogating ONLY WANT a confession from you that you did the crime. It would be different if cops were actually just and wanted only justice but they only want ranks and to boost their careers. It's disgusting but it's a reality. That's why lawyers exist. That's why you wait for your attorney to be present to inform you of what you can and can not answer based on THE LAW. And for the love god... DO NOT REPRESENT YOURSELF. It never helps, and when it does help it's so rare that it doesn't even count as a statistic. Just don't do it.

I really hope this information helps someone in the future.


This style of interrogation seems like it would get a lot of fake confessions.


I started this channel with “there’s something about Casey” and my goodness these people are sick man my lord


im just imagining the prosecution going "dude, that shit is SO fake like omg! she straight up killed em man!


imagine if somehow she was innocent and the interrogator forced her to look at those pictures :/


Can someone who’s familiar with this justice system explain why she’s sitting there still? And why the officer didn’t immediately step out when she asked for her lawyer, and when she said she wanted to go back to her cell?

Not sure what Pop Out’s video is about, but JCS says in his video that in Canada, invoking the right to be silent means you don’t have to answer but the interrogators can still ask questions. They can remain silent throughout if they want, but the interrogators asking questions or talking to her is not impeding her right to be silent.


if she didn't talk for the whole investigation, how they proved she is guilty?


Okay but i wanna know about the evidence that got her convicted


Wild to me how other countries work. In some cases would be nice if america could do this. Bt in cases ur innocent yikes.
This entire interrogation would be inadmissible in america. She invoked and asked for an attorney and was jusy given advice over the phone then questioned alone? Then adviced she was staying silent and they can still question?
Wow!
I feel bad for those babies. This lady is a monster


remind me why bail is even allowed for people facing murder charges....?


Oh & btw….

I LOVE how JCS ends his videos….no goodbye no ending  long extra azz story or dragged out opinion,  just smooth cat hush fade out picture exit stage left story over type ish lol !! Haha love it.

All hail king JCS 🙌🏽


i’ve been watching all the videos on his page in order. i’m addicted 😵💫


I love this interviewer "What do you think we did, hire actors?!"

At this point has she been found guilty of the crime? because if not showing a mother such graphic images is beyond cruel. Imagine for a minute that she is innocent (like we are all supposed to do until guilt is proven beyond reasonable doubt) It doesn't matter how we 'think' she should be acting. Being emotional detached doesn't make her guilty of the crime. I have no idea if she is guilty or not, having only watched a few minutes of this footage but I find it really disturbing that the officer is forcing her to view such images.


Possibility of parole is way too generous for a mother who murdered her own children without remorse.


How on Earth can you only get 10 years for killing your own daughters?


every lawyer in canada: remain silent<br>every defendant after: 🗣

every lawyer in canada: remain silent
every defendant after: 🗣


"You believe what you want"<br>Psh that guy doesn't even know when April Fools day is.

"You believe what you want"
Psh that guy doesn't even know when April Fools day is.


Ever see the video of the 2 news reporters fighting on-air? The woman there in the blue robe looks exactly like this woman. I swear it must be the same woman. Creepy.


Criminal: commits murder
Criminal: gets put in jail
Society: yeah, you're really gonna suffer now
Criminal: watches TV, plays sports, 3 meals a day, doesn't have to pay rent


Killing an innocent child should carry life in prison with no chance of parole!


alot of problems I have with all these videos is they never have a lawyer with them


Devils advocate, for those saying the woman got lesser sentence for murder than her husband, who got 15 years for drugs, remember that was 200kg to cocaine and imagine the hundreds/thousands of people lives that 200kg of drug would ruin, im sure death from overdose and other incidents, car crashes, would occur. So I agree people who are in jail for marijuana is not the same but cocaine and other hard drugs especially in this volume should be punished badly as well.


Why are their more "jcs inspired" videos, then actual jcs videos! I WANT MOAR!


why does this detective sound exactly like the brilliant yet tortured detective from murder mystery


Passive aggressive to a level where it makes the other person tired and could be seen as hardcore harassment. Ofc it's Canada 🤭


I just checked the narrator's channel,  and OMG that is not the picture that i had in my brain.


This should be against the law, what happened to innocent until proven guilty in a court


It’s so strange that a mighty country like Canada has hung on to the monarchy of another state as it’s head of state. It’s so strange to hear Canadian terms “crown attorney “ , royal Canadian mounted police , Governor General of Canada. And to know as a British citizen that our queen is also the queen of Canada. Does that mean that she is a Canadian citizen as well?

It’s the same with Australia and New Zealand. It’s essentially meaningless as Britain holds no “true” power or authority over those countries. Debatably, Canada is a stronger country that Great Britain, given how fewer ‘enemies’ the country has.

It’s more-so a sign of respect for Great Britain.


lol she filed an appeal and was released from prison. Ahhhh yes, nothing like being a woman in the judicial system.


"Your kids are dead and your the prime suspect" <br>"Im their mother, how dare you"

"Your kids are dead and your the prime suspect"
"Im their mother, how dare you"


The threat of more than one minute stuck with that interrogater would have made me confess.


She’s not very silent for someone claiming the right to remain silent


so this woman is locked up for another 7 years but Casey Anthony, who clearly killed her poor daughter, is free. amazing.


"I have the right to remain silent" then continues talking. It's nice that criminals are often so stupid. 😅


If she used her right to remain silent, that guy needs to back off asking questions.


Geesh there is a HUGE difference between the Canadian and American justice system. 10 years!


Wow she REALLY didn't want to help him set up that April Fool's day zinger


0:35 Interrogator: „I find it STRANGE that you are not upset.“
She: „I find it strange that I am in this situation“
Interrogator: „Why do you use the word STRANGE?“
Is he playing mindgames on a victim? Never talk to the police!

@Slothfully Slothfully that is true. He was looking to win a case more. However, it was so obvious she killed the kids.

I know. I can't take this interrogation. Whether she's guilty or not, there's so many things that the interrogator does here that is so cruelly manipulative. He's not looking for information at this point. He's looking to win a case. I cannot watch this video anymore.


I thought the cops had to stop talking to you once you lawyer up?


“today is april first, but you believe it is april fools day. and it is, youve been pranked, we did fake the scene, your kids are in the office well get them” <br>good ending

“today is april first, but you believe it is april fools day. and it is, youve been pranked, we did fake the scene, your kids are in the office well get them”
good ending


I hate to say it but she did achieve what she set out to do. I know I wouldn't live long either if that happened to my daughters.


So crazy humans can change so fast. the best part was "What pretending to be crazy looks like".


Even if you are in denial that your kids are dead you would still be hysterical not calm.


She almost got away with it and got shit for time. She could be free in 8 years.


Internet lawyers I'm curious, she lawyered up several times and he continues to interrogate her.  Isn't this a clear violation of the 5th and 6th amendments (Miranda rights)?


It is INSANE the cops can keep.interogating you for up to 5 hours after invoking legal consul.


Damn, the comment section is full of dummies who think if you get sentenced to "life with the possibility of parole after 10 years", you get out after 10 years guaranteed. If that's so, what does the word "possibility" mean in that phrase? Why do parole boards exist if people just get out when they are eligible?


We need the whole video. Please upload full video!!


Drugs: 15years

Killing two little girls: bail, then 10 years.... then possible parol.

Drugs: 15years

Killing two little girls: bail, then 10 years.... then possible parol.

She was given a life sentence. Parole requires approval, and there's no chance they'll sympathize with a child killer.

She was given a life sentence. Parole requires approval, and there's no chance they'll sympathize with a child killer.

Possible but highly unlikely. Why stir a turd that won't happen?

Possible but highly unlikely. Why stir a turd that won't happen?

Thats what happens when you keep your mouth shut

Thats what happens when you keep your mouth shut

@Julene poverty will make people risk jail, pesky structural inequality

@Julene poverty will make people risk jail, pesky structural inequality

@Julene You are incredibly lucky to be alive in a time where you can live in wilful ignorance propped up by others.

People don't just buy drugs for fun, that's an extremely reductionist view on an issue that's far more complicated. People often turn to drugs because of MDD and develop addictions. There's a genetic component to drug addiction that makes some people from birth more susceptible to drug abuse. Do you think those people just deserve to be addicted to drugs their entire life? Do you think that because you are born with lower susceptibility to drug abuse you are simply better than those people?

These people need HELP they are sick. Instead, people like you just stand aside while prisons are filled with sick people so that a few people can profit off them.

There is no hell but sometimes I really wish there were. You were lucky enough to be born in an age where the entirety of human knowledge is at your fingertips and you decided to not learn anything. You treat the people who need your help most as criminals and their cases as hopeless.

If you want to start on understanding the issue and showing some compassion I suggest you read a book called "Chasing The Scream". It's an in-depth look at the mind-numbing failure of the "war on drugs". If you arent willing to read a book on the topic please watch a podcast that the author did where he speaks about the book and summarises its key points.

@Julene You are incredibly lucky to be alive in a time where you can live in wilful ignorance propped up by others.

People don't just buy drugs for fun, that's an extremely reductionist view on an issue that's far more complicated. People often turn to drugs because of MDD and develop addictions. There's a genetic component to drug addiction that makes some people from birth more susceptible to drug abuse. Do you think those people just deserve to be addicted to drugs their entire life? Do you think that because you are born with lower susceptibility to drug abuse you are simply better than those people?

These people need *HELP* they are sick. Instead, people like you just stand aside while prisons are filled with sick people so that a few people can profit off them.

There is no hell but sometimes I really wish there were. You were lucky enough to be born in an age where the entirety of human knowledge is at your fingertips and you decided to not learn anything. You treat the people who need your help most as criminals and their cases as hopeless.

If you want to start on understanding the issue and showing some compassion I suggest you read a book called "Chasing The Scream". It's an in-depth look at the mind-numbing failure of the "war on drugs". If you arent willing to read a book on the topic please watch a podcast that the author did where he speaks about the book and summarises its key points.

I mean she's a woman, whaddya expect they could harbor WMD for warlords and commit genocide and get off the hook in a year, justice system isn't justice for them smh

I mean she's a woman, whaddya expect they could harbor WMD for warlords and commit genocide and get off the hook in a year, justice system isn't justice for them smh

It is probably becoz drug supply can kill any no.of people

It is probably becoz drug supply can kill any no.of people

Nah 30 years in my country if you sell drugs

Nah 30 years in my country if you sell drugs

D Į Ç Ī P Ł Ï Ń Ę - B Ę Å T Ś

@Julene You're completely missing the point. People are always going to do everything. The punishment should fit the crime.

@Julene You're completely missing the point. People are always going to do everything. The punishment should fit the crime.

@Jessica Rich  fr most drugs dealers who got nothing else lived through shit that would make a grown man cry. Not trying to defend anyone but most people who live like that have been abused and alone in the past, many from childhood without having a choice.

@Julene some people fall into a bad time and end up selling drugs. For many of them, it’s all they know. Prisons are focused on punishment and not rehabilitation so many of them fall back into the same habit as they have no where else to go.

@jmac Not just Canada, fam. USA barely punishes people who harm children.

@jmac Not just Canada, fam. USA barely punishes people who harm children.

Do you have any ideas how many lives and families would be ruined by that amount of drugs?  two lives are nothing comparing the destruction those drug could bring to others

Do you have any ideas how many lives and families would be ruined by that amount of drugs?  two lives are nothing comparing the destruction those drug could bring to others

@I M Yeah, I completely agree with you. I think so too - in US especially the system is broken and too many go to jail for too long time for minor things. Also 3 times & life is absolutely heinous. But there is other side of the coin too - here for serious, violent crimes are not properly sentenced. I think that that sends a message to society - what is acceptable and what is not. In that way it almost encourages to rape etc.. For victims, there are not justice. Also, when these violent and careless psychopaths get a slap in the wrist, all of us are in danger.

@Aliisa Taipale Absolutely agree with you, it‘s just so sad. I often think that America is sometimes way too harsh with their sentences and also it is so easy to get into jail, even if you are innocent and are not able to proof it. You just have to be on the wrong place at the wrong time. But otherwise, in european countries like ours, the sentences (if it even comes to one!) are way too short or they are released after a short amount of time. Something needs to change here, definitely.

@Julene and your still missing the point. Drugs are not as bad as drugs

@Julene and your still missing the point. Drugs are not as bad as drugs

The more heinous the murder the sooner you get out in Canada.   Look at the guy who beheaded and cannibalized a passenger on a Greyhound bus in Manitoba.  He was walking the streets again in less than 7 years.

You should see our system in Austria. It is really difficult here to get in jail for murder. Mostly the killers get away with 10-15 years in prison with a possible parol (which will be accepted in 90% of the cases) only a few years after in jail. It is so sad, but the system here seems to believe in the good in people. Child molesters here do not get even close to the inside of a jail cell ..

Here in Finland was a similar case. Mother suffocated her toddler. <br>In criminal psychstudies were found that she has a NPD. Sentence = 10 years, may get out sooner bcs she is a first timer (this rule considers even most violent crimes). What an unjustice! You can get that amount of time for economical crimes and drug crimes. It is so absurd.

Here in Finland was a similar case. Mother suffocated her toddler.
In criminal psychstudies were found that she has a NPD. Sentence = 10 years, may get out sooner bcs she is a first timer (this rule considers even most violent crimes). What an unjustice! You can get that amount of time for economical crimes and drug crimes. It is so absurd.

Small minded way of looking at it but alright

Small minded way of looking at it but alright

Ya , out in 10 years,  and she can stay in a.... half no guard,  prison., For the last 5 years of her 10 year stay....Sickening...

Ya , out in 10 years,  and she can stay in a.... half no guard,  prison., For the last 5 years of her 10 year stay....Sickening...

Like I always say: if you even find the need to off someone do it in Canada or UK. You won’t get any time

Like I always say: if you even find the need to off someone do it in Canada or UK. You won’t get any time

@Sam John even if there were zero consequences, murdering one's children... there are no words. Just like the thousands of mothers who pay to have their innocent unborn children murdered in the safest place God created for them, their mother's womb. Legally there may be no consequences, but those murders carry consequences we couldn't even begin to fathom.

@Julene the fact that people get more jail time time for drugs on average than murder, rape, or pedophilia is dumb. don't act like drug users/sellers somehow deserve more time than people who do WAY worse.

@Persephone L modern science says a man can be a woman and a woman can be a man. You can keep your modern science.

@Persephone L modern science says a man can be a woman and a woman can be a man. You can keep your modern science.

@Julene your comments are embarrassingly ignorant about the modern science that clearly  shows addiction behaves much like a disease in the addicts body and mind. It’s rooted in their biology.
Yeah, people still use drugs even though they could end up in jail for a long time or experience losing everything. They don’t do that because it’s fun, or it’s a choice.

That doesn’t mean we excuse their behavior, but to punish them with harsher sentences than we do rapists and murderers is absolutely inexcusable. And it clearly doesn’t work to help lower the rising addiction rates, as drug addiction is now one of the leading causes of death in North America. Clearly, having zero compassion and just locking addicts up and treating them with disdain isn’t helping.

And just because some addicts engage in those things you listed, doesn’t mean that they all do. Each addict is an individual and shouldn’t be judged by the actions of others. Not all addicts have kids, most probably don’t. Not all of them are jobless, or driving under the influence.

@Julene addressed is different than coddled...you wouldnt say the same same things about an mentally disabled person even if it could be framed in a similar way would you?

@Julene addressed is different than coddled...you wouldnt say the same same things about an mentally disabled person even if it could be framed in a similar way would you?

Hungry henry that's exactly the point.  As long as drugs are illegal, THAT'S the battle addicts are fighting.  Make them legal and that battle goes away, leaving the addict to face THEMSELVES, which just might turn things around for them.  Speaking from personal experience of course.  Are you?

As a female drug addict, I'd like to say that many people who buy drugs do so because they feel like they have no other choice.  Like myself, going into withdrawal is something no one wants to do, and we live in fear of it every day.  Every drug addict was once a little child, and I can guarantee you not one of us said to ourselves "I wanna be a drug addict when I grow up!"<br>Life happens and until you've been in someone else's shoes, please don't judge.  Judging people at the bottom of our society is so easy, especially if you've never been there.

As a female drug addict, I'd like to say that many people who buy drugs do so because they feel like they have no other choice.  Like myself, going into withdrawal is something no one wants to do, and we live in fear of it every day.  Every drug addict was once a little child, and I can guarantee you not one of us said to ourselves "I wanna be a drug addict when I grow up!"
Life happens and until you've been in someone else's shoes, please don't judge.  Judging people at the bottom of our society is so easy, especially if you've never been there.

Yep.  And where I live on the east coast, a woman gave birth to three children and killed each one of them the moment they were born.  She hid the bodies but they were eventually discovered and she was charged with "Infanticide", which carries a max penalty of 5 years.  Only women can be charged with Infanticide.  If a man did the exact same crime he'd be charged with homicide.  Now that's an example of ACTUAL privilege.  Female privilege.

backwards. killing two little girls would be LIFE in my world of justice. why life sentence over death penalty? because the other prisoners are unusually cruel toward people who hurt children.

backwards. killing two little girls would be LIFE in my world of justice. why life sentence over death penalty? because the other prisoners are unusually cruel toward people who hurt children.

@Julene I think you're missing the point here

@Julene I think you're missing the point here

@Julene That's true, it's awful that many people that join the police force, cia, fbi, etc. do so to stay above the law and get away with actions that a regular citizen can not. There has to be some justice for the system to work. The biggest enemy comes from within.

@Michael 💯 - but they won't be held accountable. No one said the system is fair. They make the rules and we can choose whether we'll fall into their traps or not. "They" being the powers that be.

@Michael 💯 - but they won't be held accountable. No one said the system is fair. They make the rules and we can choose whether we'll fall into their traps or not. "They" being the powers that be.

yet the CIA  are smuggling tons of drugs.

yet the CIA  are smuggling tons of drugs.

@Julene And you think drug addicts are in the business of thinking about consequences?

@Julene And you think drug addicts are in the business of thinking about consequences?

@Anahata347 Sure. And you can pay your own medical bills instead of using tax dollars when you end up overdosing.

@Anahata347 Sure. And you can pay your own medical bills instead of using tax dollars when you end up overdosing.

Thats canada baby, we don't believe in life in prison, or at least its extremely rare to see here. We believe in rehabilitation and reintegration, which in theory presents as ideal, that is if you believe bad eggs can change and become healthy civil members of society. Though realistically it causes greater grief to family's of victims and victims alike. As well, it doesn't necessarily follow suit with the way the world works, and prisons here are not rehabilitation centre's so this system in practice is flawed. That being said giving criminals a path to redemption is obviously preferable to overcrowded jails and unredemable sentences, yet when crimes are so gruesome in nature it makes people more uncomfortable then anything. In an ideal world anyone could be rehabilitated (or even better, never be raised into the type of person that will commit such a crime) but thats not the world we live in, besides the average person isn't as forgiving as jesus so people will never feel comfortable with such a concept

Julene and yet people still make children, knowing the consequences.

Julene and yet people still make children, knowing the consequences.

@Matt Morgan some rules are for idiots, so who's to say everything the government says is good

@Matt Morgan some rules are for idiots, so who's to say everything the government says is good

@Julene it's their own decision, their own life

@Julene it's their own decision, their own life

she is finished in or out of prison altho I think in prison she will be less of a burden on her family and the public.

she is finished in or out of prison altho I think in prison she will be less of a burden on her family and the public.

@Julene  when your life feels so shit, due to circumstance or mental illness, that you can't feel joy during your day otherwise... drugs very quickly become a prosthetic.
Prosthetic joy. Prosthetic relaxation. Prosthetic motivation. Prosthetic energy.
It's not good, but all of those things are necessary to proper human survival. It's not right, but once you're addicted you don't have too much choice anyway.
Withdrawal physically hurts. It prevents you from functioning at all, like you've fallen ill, sometimes for weeks. If you need to work to feed yourself then you can't get off of the drugs. If you are already mentally ill then getting off the drugs can be dangerous too.
You're trapped.

Its not a good idea to buy or sell drugs, of course - but once a simple mistake has been made... "just stop taking drugs, the legal consequences are too high" just isn't a reasonable response. Robust free healthcare - and free legal assistance - are KEY to helping shoot the drug trade in the knee.
Drugs will always be traded and always be used. People will always make dumb decisions, no matter how illegal you make it. If we can get people OFF of drugs effectively then we can save those who are trapped, we can save teenagers before their lives get destroyed and we can save lives before they are lost.

@hungry henry They can stop if they really want to. I know of plenty of people who were heroin addicts and they got help got in rehab and live drug free now. It's a hard decision but it's there responsibility to get clean. You can force a heroin addict to go to rehab and get help but if they really don't want to change they will start again. You have to want to get clean for yourself.

They don't get 15 years for drugs. They get 15 years because of other crimes associated with it.

They don't get 15 years for drugs. They get 15 years because of other crimes associated with it.

@Steven Hetzel Victimless crime? Tell that to my student who was passed around so mom could get money for drugs. Tell that to the boy who's mom   forgot to feed him because she was too high to care.

@Harry Nutsachel Take off your tinfoil hat, please.  It is glaring.

@Harry Nutsachel Take off your tinfoil hat, please.  It is glaring.

@Kaladin Stormblessed Just because she has the possibility of parole doesn't mean she will get it.

@Kaladin Stormblessed Just because she has the possibility of parole doesn't mean she will get it.

Kind of makes you think how stupid are the people who make the laws

Kind of makes you think how stupid are the people who make the laws

@Renata Tostada No shit. American penal system focuses on draining government funds so they have all the incentive to have as long as possible sentences and as high as possible repeat offense rate.

to be fair this isn't america

at least here, it would be 20 years then parole...

to be fair this isn't america

at least here, it would be 20 years then parole...

@Salma E. If you kill two kids of your own, only two lives were impacted. When you peddle drugs, thousands of lives go down the drain - and that's in direct damage, not to discuss crime caused by use of drugs.

@hungry henry Do you not realize that it being legal or not doesn't change what AN ADDICT will do to get a fix? They don't care, the psychological and physical high is already something they're dependent on. Making it legal or at least decriminalizing it will make it easier to test drugs for trace lethal substances and actually get addicts the mental help they need. HARM REDUCTION. Prison is not the place that addicts should be. Its more likely than not that an addict will go BACK to prison because of their addiction than prison actually rehabilitating them at all (because maybe, just maybe prison is a punishment and way for prison corporations to make money and not to actually rehabilitate criminals into members of society). This is why more of the funding that goes to prisons should be reallocated to mental health and addiction services.

I'm thinking none of you have actually served time in prison.
Life with the possibility of parole after 10 years doesn't necessarily mean she'll actually go before the parole board after 10 years.
The board will review her progress in prison and decide whether she's done enough to appear before them or not.

She could serve 25 years before they grant her an audience and still get knocked back.

If she gets out in 10 years, any small charge of reoffending and she'll be back in prison for a recall.

Take a look at the difference in sentencing between men and women for the same crimes; you’ll find your answer there.

Take a look at the difference in sentencing between men and women for the same crimes; you’ll find your answer there.

@jmac this happens in usa a well, its about power money and state jurisdiction...Canada for sure is too lenient...

@jmac this happens in usa a well, its about power money and state jurisdiction...Canada for sure is too lenient...

It’s called “Women Privilege”.<br>Sorta like “White Privilege”.

It’s called “Women Privilege”.
Sorta like “White Privilege”.

@Julene blame the buyers without no demand there is no supply

@Julene blame the buyers without no demand there is no supply

I feel like parole shouldn't be an option, however unlike how you commented ahe wasn't sentenced to 10 years, she was eligible for parole in 10 years, that is different

I feel like parole shouldn't be an option, however unlike how you commented ahe wasn't sentenced to 10 years, she was eligible for parole in 10 years, that is different

@Steven Hetzel ah yes, those who believe there are no victims involved in the distribution and consumption of drugs. Victims like the children of drug addicts who grow up without a responsible protector and provider; victims like the families who are stolen from by their drug addict family members who need money to buy their drugs; victims like tax payers who must pay higher taxes to make up for the drug addicts who don't contribute their fair share to society; victims like the person killed in a car accident caused by a drug addict who drove while under the influence of an illegal substance. Yes, why even consider these victims - people should be coddled in their addictions, and not made to face the consequences of their actions, regardless of how it infringes on the wellbeing of others! Good point.

@Julene ah yes, the "Don't break the law" defense.  As if victimless crimes should be punishable in the first place.

@Julene ah yes, the "Don't break the law" defense.  As if victimless crimes should be punishable in the first place.

@Zstead one it's not a blind rush though it's often well thought out until a woman or a bitch made man gets involved and ends up ruining the whole operation by giving into fear under the threat of consequences

Bottom line is you will see a shift to where men dont even bother getting married or start bringing other guys into the operation. The hustlers will just make the circles smaller since bringing new people into the equation is too risky. And women will wonder why they only get simps to stay but any OG hits and dips within a week. Lol cause nobody has time for that liability! Weak men gonna wonder why they cant get plugged in lol cause they going to squeal under the slightest pressure

@Matt Morgan You really think a discussion of motivations is that black and white? I'm pretty sure people in fear find their own happiness besides a simple hormonal high. You could make a correlative argument, but to dismiss it all as a blind rush for the highs seems incomplete...

@Zstead one it was in no way intended as a defense? Lol I wouldn't give a minute of being high back for anything. Anyone who lives in fear wouldn't understand the joy of being free. Often women arent worried about being free they are more concerned with their safety and other peoples safety. Not freedom

@Matt Morgan This guy really pull a 'because hormones' defense? lol

@Matt Morgan This guy really pull a 'because hormones' defense? lol

@Harry Nutsachel Like any other aspect of life isn't the same...

@Harry Nutsachel Like any other aspect of life isn't the same...

Sending hate mail to the creators of South Park:<br>25 years...

Sending hate mail to the creators of South Park:
25 years...

"Well, she's their Mother, so..." So she's allowed to choose whether or not they live or die.

"Well, she's their Mother, so..." So she's allowed to choose whether or not they live or die.

yet there are junkies everywhere on the streets, prisons are full and US have drug problems like no other country where weed is legal....Seems there is something wrong with this "lock them up" country

@Harry Nutsachel like Canada is not all about money....can't fool me...I live here.

@Harry Nutsachel like Canada is not all about money....can't fool me...I live here.

@Julene
The reason people still smuggle drugs is the same reason they smuggled booze during alcohol prohibition....HUGE PROFITS.
And it's the governments who are to blame, yet it's the people who do the time.
Drug prohibition is an even bigger crime against humanity than alcohol prohibition. The devastation caused by the absurd illegality of drugs, is almost incalculable.
Far, far more than the damage caused by the drugs themselves.

Sadly she all but gets away with it. If this was a man that had killed his kids he would get life but for her its bs called "spousal revenge filicide" all that should matter is that she took away the lives of two innocent children by poisoning her own kids for selfish reasons. I have no sympathy for her whatsoever and firmly believe she should have gotten life in prison without any chance of parole. Taking away the futures of the next generation because you are too selfish to take care of your child the way you should just shows she never should have had children to begin with. The strongest bond is the mother daughter bond and the fact she can heartlessly toss that away not once but twice in a single motion is disgusting. Murder is murder and one of the few things old societies would have done better than us is removing this woman from the world in a proper way so she could not endanger a child ever again. This was no act of self defense or a life or death situation this was a parent trying to find a quick and easy escape by ignoring their responsibilities just as Casey did. No sympathy for either of these cold blooded murderers.<br>After thought: Even the ex husband had more remorse and emotion about the deaths. He got a severe punishment and took his own way out but he did so seemingly out of guilt and deep sadness while she remained cold and unmoving. If there was ever proof about the absurdity of gender bias in the law this is it plain as day.  Again this was neither an accident nor a situation where she would be unattached to the victims she  was doing this for herself and because she lacked any emotion towards them.

Sadly she all but gets away with it. If this was a man that had killed his kids he would get life but for her its bs called "spousal revenge filicide" all that should matter is that she took away the lives of two innocent children by poisoning her own kids for selfish reasons. I have no sympathy for her whatsoever and firmly believe she should have gotten life in prison without any chance of parole. Taking away the futures of the next generation because you are too selfish to take care of your child the way you should just shows she never should have had children to begin with. The strongest bond is the mother daughter bond and the fact she can heartlessly toss that away not once but twice in a single motion is disgusting. Murder is murder and one of the few things old societies would have done better than us is removing this woman from the world in a proper way so she could not endanger a child ever again. This was no act of self defense or a life or death situation this was a parent trying to find a quick and easy escape by ignoring their responsibilities just as Casey did. No sympathy for either of these cold blooded murderers.
After thought: Even the ex husband had more remorse and emotion about the deaths. He got a severe punishment and took his own way out but he did so seemingly out of guilt and deep sadness while she remained cold and unmoving. If there was ever proof about the absurdity of gender bias in the law this is it plain as day.  Again this was neither an accident nor a situation where she would be unattached to the victims she  was doing this for herself and because she lacked any emotion towards them.

@Julene almost as if the war on drugs doesn't work

@Julene almost as if the war on drugs doesn't work

@Julene okay but can we talk about the fact that killing two girls is worse than drugs yet the sentences are vindictive of this

@Julene okay but can we talk about the fact that killing two girls is worse than drugs yet the sentences are vindictive of this

@jmac LOL like it would have been different elsewhere.

@jmac LOL like it would have been different elsewhere.

@Kaladin Stormblessed The Crown is behind the whole fraud. The "Laws" in the U.S. come from England. Everywhere the "Legal Society" operates, this is happening. Attorney's do NOT practice Law, they are Forbidden. They are ONLY allowed to Practice what is in the Legal World, which are Statutes and Codes. 99% of the Populations have no clue what the difference is between Law and what is Legal. . . and the Zionist's behind it all, have used ALL Media to feed dis-information to "the People" for well over 100+ years to keep this fraud going. Canadians, like Americans have a Choice of Jurisdiction....Real Law...Which is Exclusive Equity....or they can have "Color of Law" Statutes and Codes. However, if the people are unaware of what Rights are and What Real Law is.....they have no knowledge to Uphold and Enforce said Rights.

@Harry Nutsachel except this is in Quebec, Canada... not the U.S.

@Harry Nutsachel except this is in Quebec, Canada... not the U.S.

thank god (reagan) for the war on drugs amirite?

thank god (reagan) for the war on drugs amirite?

What You and 99.9% of the Public does NOT know, is that EVERY US COURT has Nothing to do with Justice, its all about MONEY....The BONDS the Courts are producing. It is NEVER about anything else.

What You and 99.9% of the Public does NOT know, is that EVERY US COURT has Nothing to do with Justice, its all about MONEY....The BONDS the Courts are producing. It is NEVER about anything else.

She was given a life sentence on 2 accounts of second degree murder, with possibility of parole after 10 years... not fifteen years.

She was given a life sentence on 2 accounts of second degree murder, with possibility of parole after 10 years... not fifteen years.

It was life with a possibility of parole in 10 years. It was also for 2nd, not 1st, degree murder.

I do agree with you, however, that killing 2 children should result in a much harsher sentence than drug charges, but unfortunately, the judicial system here in Canada is a mess.

@Matt Morgan oh, in that case, its all fine and dandy! :)

@Matt Morgan oh, in that case, its all fine and dandy! :)

@Julene cause the consequences dont matter compared to those highs and possibilities of fast money. Also most of these guys are... guys. Because they enjoy the adrenaline rushes and breaking rules

@Julene cause the consequences dont matter compared to those highs and possibilities of fast money. Also most of these guys are... guys. Because they enjoy the adrenaline rushes and breaking rules

And yet people still buy and sell drugs, knowing the consequences.

And yet people still buy and sell drugs, knowing the consequences.


It all started with the comment section filled with JCS recommendation on a post from yesterday on fb by unbelievable facts on Stephanie Lazarus for me to have binged thru their entire channel, also the second channel and unlisted videos after desperately searching reddit for more content 😐 Now I don't know what to do


You know, she's really fucked up, and did a very, very awful thing, but at the same time is anyone else just kinda baffled by the fact that an interrogator can literally just keep you there for hours and hours and hours, mentally beating you down the whole time, until you finally just snap?  I mean, why even have the right to remain silent at that point?  It's such a joke.  Imagine being innocent in this situation and just being berated and mentally tortured for five hours for a crime you didn't commit because you want to express your right as a citizen.

If you literally don't say a single word, I'm sure they'll give up eventually lol.

That's why you just KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT and only speak to your lawyer.


“you just have to keep focused, on the reason why you did it. this is your strength, you disagree?” impeccable detective here


How does one get cyanide in prison? That's got me scratching my head...