This cop and all those involved should have been fired, sued personally and charged with kidnapping and rights violations (whatever they have in crappy Canada).


Dang that guy was calm. I would tell that cop to get the f*****g tv in there and play that f*****g video.


This is why I hate this idea that if you accuse someone of something, and they act defensively, that it's indicative that they're guilty. If you were accused of something you didn't do, you're telling me you would be fucking calm?


Cop: *breaks eye-contact*

Michael: Weakness disgust me

Cop: **breaks eye-contact**

Michael: *Weakness disgust me*

@jose ppi being an introvert doesnt mean youre shy. im an introvert but people find me intimidating.

@AGeneric_ _Gamer and I think you should help yourself more, what if one of your classmates slanders you for stealing their school money and you just keep quiet??  this happened in the real world and my own experience lol i'm usually quiet and don't like trouble immediately grab a broom at the back of the class and beat up those who slander me and spread rumors until they cry, we ended up being detained in the principal's office, the principal ordered  me to call my parents, I called and complained about what happened, then I told my parents to dress as nice and expensive as possible, wear suits and dresses, wear gold rings, gold necklaces and gold bracelets, drive our expensive car  to school, just to show I'm from a rich family.  well that was one of my rather bold, naive, and arrogant experiences that i remember to this day.  it's just a relief, rather than me just being silent.

@AGeneric_ _Gamer well you just have to have a little confidence, so what if they ignore me because my voice is too low?? I'll keep repeating the same line over and over again until they hear me and give me an "you're annonying" look 😂

@jose ppi This is the power of controlled anger. Trust me fellow introvert, anger is a useful feeling if used right. You can transform it into extreme determination and thus improve performance. or turn it into confidence. I think one of introvert's main weaknesses is not knowing how to use anger. I used to either suppress it entirely or lose it in blind rage.

@AGeneric_ _Gamer yeah but you dont speak for all introverts, you can be an introvert who happens to have no self confidence like yourself, or you can be confident and simply chose to observe. Just because you belong to group X and have a certain trait doesn't mean all of group X shares said trait bruh

@AGeneric_ _Gamer That's like saying "I'm a psychopath, so I know everything about psychopaths". Introversion is a spectrum but shyness is not necessarily a trait of an introvert but rather preferring to be alone. Introversion is a matter of projection of personality, extroverts push their personality out and they're the center of attention. Introverts don't put them out

@｡*♡ 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓭𝔂 ♡*｡ lmao didn't think people would find it that funny tbh

@Just a Cat Inside a Pumpkin. And from an introverted analytic to boot.

Imagine being the beta cop to an alpha nerd.

｡*♡ 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓭𝔂 ♡*｡

｡*♡ 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓭𝔂 ♡*｡

@AGeneric_ _Gamer Eh, both are introverts

@AGeneric_ _Gamer I think that has more to do with a lack of self-confidence or pessimism rather than being an introvert.

@sasa margareta I'm an introvert and  this is wrong, I just don't think me speaking would matter and I would be ignored

@jose ppi Introverts are not shy, they are like viewers with a low sense of presence but will inevitably step forward when needed, especially when it comes to their own lives...

Imagine being an introvert god being able to make eye contact? Is this the power of the god? Is this our potential as introverts???

"How dare you look away from me peasant"

He showed who was more dominant in the situation


The officer sounds so proud over nothing and it makes me cringe


"i'm innocent"

"That's exactly what guilty people say!"

good detective work.

@The Devil Strigoi *,...,* The Salem Witch Trials and the religious hysteria surrounding dark magics is where that came from. People like to think of themselves as rational or they think with logic and reason, but we humans are susceptible to our biases and emotions more than we like to admit.

Reminds me of "if you float you're guilty and if you sink you're innocent."

@Basilisk then they'd arrest you, cuz u just gave em a confession🤷

@Glitch You are right. The police treats everyone as criminal.

@Ann An you do realize that’s sarcasm right

What do you think the real innocent people say?

@Glitch so two people said I vented in medbay but  I was never in medbay, electrical, or security

@Basilisk reverse psychology failed successfully

truth is..............  innocent people  ~DO~  say they are "guilty" ...when asked by cops
PROBLEM IS..... they are not "GUILTY" about the things the COPS are accusing them of
...that's what happened to ME.  .... I'm innocent, but once you admit ANY form of guilt .... you are SLAMMED with everything........ when you were NEVER Truly Guilty ...at all.  (if cops would just be HONEST and straight with innocent people... innocents would not wind up punished, but they treat it like a game)  INNOCENT truly totally innocent people..........  are too damn straight & trusting  (assuming the police officer is doing the "Right" thing)  my behavior definitely fell under the "Atypical" variety .... I did Not fit any common mould.  (so was unjustly handled) My motivations were atypical / and unlike others of the "type" they usually handled.

truth is..............  *innocent people*  ~DO~  say they are "guilty" ...when asked by cops
PROBLEM IS..... they are not "GUILTY" about the things the COPS are accusing them of
...that's what happened to ME.  .... I'm innocent, but once you admit ANY form of guilt .... you are SLAMMED with everything........ when you were NEVER Truly Guilty ...at all.  (if cops would just be HONEST and straight with innocent people... innocents would not wind up punished, but they treat it like a game)  INNOCENT truly totally innocent people..........  *are too damn straight & trusting*  (assuming the police officer is doing the "Right" thing)  my behavior definitely fell under *the "Atypical" variety* .... I did Not fit any common mould.  (so was unjustly handled) My motivations were atypical / and unlike others of the "type" they usually handled.

@The Three Nerdy Musketeers No I was in admin

@Legatus cap cap cap, i saw you vent in medbay

If I am really innocent, I must say that I am guilty. Nicely

Me: "What you said is exactly what a GUILTY person would say."<br>Internal Affairs: "He got you there, detective."

Me: "What you said is exactly what a GUILTY person would say."
Internal Affairs: "He got you there, detective."

@CommanderGuy Say nothing if your guilty right? One knows when one is guilty not everyone lacks discernment knows when a person is lying. <b>"Cock Roach Motel"</b> where they can check in- but can't check out including the two legged kind. Peace & Blessings

@CommanderGuy Say nothing if your guilty right? One knows when one is guilty not everyone lacks discernment knows when a person is lying. *"Cock Roach Motel"* where they can check in- but can't check out including the two legged kind. Peace & Blessings

Say you're innocent, and you're guilty
Say you're guilty, and you're guilty
Catch-22

Vote @LLX ! out he accused me for no reason

IKR and it's not fair to the innocent...


I hope he sued the everloving crap out of them.


A year later the oath breakers are still at it.


I’m utterly disgusted at the police’s willingness to destroy an innocent man.  Here are cases where the suspects can easily be ruled out and the officers have no interest or care in doing so.  This is as evil as it comes.  The violation of trust is horrible.  Truly horrible.


so what I don't get is does it make you look more guilty /ruin your case /get your wrongfully imprisoned by answering questions short, to the point ,consise because you know you did nothing wrong so why not answer. Or to say nothing because you know you did nothing wrong and know that it will be used against you when the time comes and to get an attorney. or to remain calm like the first guy who was super calm and confident because on his case "getting a confession void of evidence somehow is great for a detectives career? and not illegal ? and the detective " has nothing to gain from looking at evidence? wtf like wtf acftually did i just hear ?


Really not a fan of that whole "we already know you did it" crap in interrogation. Things like that can intimidate innocent people into false confessions in order to receive a lesser charge/sentence. Matter of fact, I'm pretty sure I read an article that had details from multiple cases of exactly that. If the goal is a justice system that treats suspects as innocent until proven guilty, that should extend to law enforcement interrogation.

@Your Auntie’s Little Secret I finished school.  School ran till 16.
I then did 2 degrees as an adult.
On another point, why are you straying from the subject to ad hom? Anyone might think you’ve got nothing to add and are instead seeking other measures.

@rafer Jefferson iii This is truly an opinion of someone who didn’t finish school.

@Your Auntie’s Little Secret ah, I see, so you’re sourcing your ideas from documentaries - specially selected stories from people who think like you, to support your own worldview.

@Your Auntie’s Little Secret someone who just used the term “white bias” telling someone else “you don’t know what you’re talking about”<br>Erm….LOL

@Your Auntie’s Little Secret someone who just used the term “white bias” telling someone else “you don’t know what you’re talking about”
Erm….LOL

@Your Auntie’s Little Secret your indoctrination is showing.

@Your Auntie’s Little Secret your indoctrination is showing.

@Crazy Carl Oh, don't get me wrong. I don't understand the people that confess out of fear. Then again, I'm also a former military cop, so I guess I wouldn't really be the type...<br>But some people are straight up terrified of law enforcement, because all they ever hear is the bad shit. A cop that does their job well almost never makes the news.

@Crazy Carl Oh, don't get me wrong. I don't understand the people that confess out of fear. Then again, I'm also a former military cop, so I guess I wouldn't really be the type...
But some people are straight up terrified of law enforcement, because all they ever hear is the bad shit. A cop that does their job well almost never makes the news.

@rafer Jefferson iii nothing you said changes the fact that there are people who are wrongfully convicted without any evidence because the cop lied to them and coerced them into a confession to benefit himself

@Yours Truly nice try. except, no one is saying ALL cops are like that. I know myself, I take a nuanced view on it. There are lots of good cops out there doing things the right way for the right reasons. However there are also a lot of bad cops out there looking to close the case quickly or they just think they know they're right and try to build a case around the conclusion they've already arrived at. So tell me, how exactly is that a black and white world view?

You're making a false equivalence from a position of complete ignorance.

@Yours Truly It is true that it can and does work, but the stated ideals of our justice system is that it is better for a guilty man to go free than for an innocent man to be falsely imprisoned.
So, while it is effective, the same effect could be achieved by simply calling out inconsistencies in their story, revealing facts about the case that show that law enforcement know what's up, and god knows how many other ways.
All that matters is that the suspect knows that their lies aren't being believed. That can be accomplished without directly calling them a liar or saying "we know you did it".
What's more, it has been shown by studying the success rate of various interrogation methods that the confrontational approach is WAY more likely to make someone clam up than it is to elicit a confession.
The best approach is through establishing report, creating a (moderately) calm atmosphere, and by playing subtle mind games with the suspect to lower their guard.

@Dies Irae well, if they are seen to be misleading then that falls apart. And you can't apply that to all cops because many want the right person to go to prison. Your statement can't be proven and is only likely for some subset of cops. Knowing how this case ended, few cops would take the risk. The case still has to go to trial  where the detectives work will be on trial.

The issue is that as we've seen from this channel, it can be an effective strategy for making sure people who did the crime are put where they belong. But if the false positive rate goes up because of the strategy ie innocent people are put in prison for a crime they didn't commit, it's not really worth it. It shouldn't work for people who didn't do it. If you tell them you have video it should let an innocent person know they have nothing to worry about. The video can't show them doing the crime. But this could backfire, though it's not likely. Micheal acted exactly as he should have acted. The other guy as well. Though, if the Making A Murderer Case is to be believed, Brendan Dassey was forced into a false confession when he may not have committed the murder. So feeble minded people could be gaslit into believing confession is the only way out of conviction. I'm torn on this method

Bro it's guilty until proven innocent. Welcome to America

Bro it's guilty until proven innocent. Welcome to America

ya I dont like that either.  If citizens can be charged with lying to law enforcement, it should also be true the other way around.

@rafer Jefferson iii your white bias is showing

@rafer Jefferson iii your white bias is showing

@rafer Jefferson iii It is literally said in the video that detectives who get confessions in cases VOID OF EVIDENCE  get advantages for their career.

@Marcus Fellinger The exact same thing has happened to me, only I refused to "confess". ...That was until they brought my mother in to force me.

@rafer Jefferson iii You're not in the U.S but you feel qualified to argue about the American justice system as if the same rules as your own applied?

i did exactly that at school and got suspended for a week.  my choices were:  confess something you didn´t even know what it was and face 1 week or face dropping out of this school completely.   it´s a no brainer what to take then if you know what type of humans the "accuser" and "investigators" = teachers were.  at that point in time i didn´t know what else would follow... like police coming to my home,  loss of friendships,  loss of teachers trust and they actively seeking to get me out.  i dropped out finally and whenever i tried to roll up the case and prove my innocence they said:  but you confessed?  why should someone confess when he didn´t do it.

i can only imagine how often this happened when police took someone and told them:  10 years jail or 3 years and confess it!

@rafer Jefferson iii It is the same here with the beat cops, but don't presume to know what kind off mindfuckery does or doesn't happen in an interrogation room unless you've been on either end of the table..

Just as in "the olden days" where cops woul beat a confession out of a suspect (have no doubt that still happens at times in some countries) which can easily lead to a false confession, in the same way that torture to extract infomation has proven to not be very useful.

@Sebastian B. I am not in the US so I neither went to an elementary school neither did I go to college.  I left school at 16 having started school at 4.
I have been arrested twice.  2 of my friends did time inside, both were guilty of what they did.
The police with me, each time, treated me fairly and gave me 2nd chances. One was a motoring offence (driving a motorbike drunk on public land - NOT a road so I thought it was ok but apparently not!) and the other time was assault, which was basically a fight but I also had false allegations added into the mix.
I am no stranger to any of this.
Things may be different in the states but here, if you are respectful towards the police and don’t act out with them, they tend to treat you fairly and the people I know who hate the police are either, ironically, college kids who buy the whole “police brutality” thing last year or otherwise, petty criminals who always crow how the police have it in for them, when the only reason they have issues is due to their actions.

@rafer Jefferson iii Let me guess, suburban college kid? Because boy (or girl, who knows) you have no idea how ugly the justice system really gets. Take it from someone who's been on both sides of that bloody table, some of it borders on psychological torture. (Of course not every detective and interrogator, but a fair share of them). Also, if you are trying to partake in a debate, replying to counter arguments with elementary school level rebuttals isn't the way.

@rafer Jefferson iii guess i stuck a nerve lol.

@rafer Jefferson iii guess i stuck a nerve lol.

@etherealessence snark? I didn’t mention snark, you mentioned snark. Says a lot about you.

@rafer Jefferson iii and responding with snark is more mature how exactly? Me thinks you're projecting.

@etherealessence OK student debating team

@etherealessence OK student debating team

@etherealessence ah, I see.  I’m not just wrong, I’m a baaaaaad person.

@rafer Jefferson iii that's a very black and white world view you got there. Says more about you than the world around you tho.

@M J generally, if you’re not an asshole with no previous criminal record, and you don’t hang around with criminals, your chances of being wrongfully convicted are about nil.
If you are a criminal or hang around with criminals, chances are much higher.
Rogue cops most certainly try to fit people up.
You tend to find those who are very skeptical of police are this way because they’re either criminals, or they sympathise with criminals.
By and large the police aren’t going round shooting people for fun and fitting people up.
Also, a lot of the cases of wrongful conviction are due to a total mistake by police in terms of who they think is guilty.  They decide it’s person x

@Eye Conqueror do you have evidence for that? 😉

@Eye Conqueror do you have evidence for that? 😉

@rafer Jefferson iii millions throughout history have been convicted without evidence, or with fabricated evidence and false testimony, or given absurd charges and sentencing that greatly exaggerates the crime in question. It's particularly easy to do to the poor.

@rafer Jefferson iii Were you born last night? Or do you really not keep up with what happens in the justice system? Innocents get jailed A LOT. Some even earning huge payouts because of the fact.

@rafer Jefferson iii In a perfect world, yeah. People get wrongfully convicted all the time though

@Lilac Rain you can’t convict people without evidence

@Lilac Rain you can’t convict people without evidence

@rafer Jefferson iii Yes, but no detective gets rewarded for bringing in an innocent suspect and confirming that they’re innocent. The goal is to get convictions, and if someone is rewarded for convicting people they’re going to try to convict people

@Dies Irae nonsense. If they are proved to be convicting people falsely they will receive discipline and potentially lose their job.

Detectives want a notch in their belt. They have NO incentive to exonerate anyone compared to being party to a conviction.

The best interrogation I've ever seen is un the movie 4 Brothers. Just shows detectives want to close a case and are shady as fuck... and I like the cops


they did not treat that first guy fairly at all. you should never be that forceful and upfront like that from the jump, saying that “we already know you’re guilty so we just wanna see what kinda person you are” when you have legitimately no evidence that he was the suspect. the description didn’t match, you lied about the fucking surveillance cameras—there are just so many wrong things with that interview, and i’m so glad that the ‘investigator’ got what he deserved, as well as the innocent guy.


the officer interogating michael was a total amateur


No one with a beard groom that good is a bad guy 😉


The title plus JCS made me think this was going to be about the Japanese criminal system


Why you should NEVER talk to police without a lawyer, even if you're innocent.

Why you should NEVER talk to police without a lawyer, even if you're innocent.

@Valo B their goal isnt to find out whether or not you are guilty, its to find someone who did it, right or not

@Valo B their goal isnt to find out whether or not you are guilty, its to find someone who did it, right or not

@JT1989 You forget the simple fact that it’s not cut and dry like that. Every hear of Murphy’s law?

@JT1989 You forget the simple fact that it’s not cut and dry like that. Every hear of Murphy’s law?

@JT1989 tel that to the people who were forced into a false confession.

@JT1989 tel that to the people who were forced into a false confession.

@JT1989  They'll find something to use. Perception is a powerful tool, they might say you were "acting strangely," even though it might be nervousness,etc. Just placing the seed of doubt into the public is enough.

@JT1989 How can you guarantee that you will perfectly recall the truth? Even a minor slip in memory will make you appear untruthful.

@JT1989 How can you guarantee that you will perfectly recall the truth? Even a minor slip in memory will make you appear untruthful.

So you need $$$ to stay out of jail? Seems legit.

So you need $$$ to stay out of jail? Seems legit.

@JT1989 All the time you've spent responding to people on here could've been used watching that video lol

@JT1989 All the time you've spent responding to people on here could've been used watching that video lol

@JT1989 even if you are guilty a good lawyer can still get you off

@JT1989 even if you are guilty a good lawyer can still get you off

@Your Name Here that's actually scary. A person in that position will feel so powerless. I think it's very difficult to say "I will not talk until my lawyer is here" when you're innocent.

@JT1989 so how did that guy end up in prison for two years?

@JT1989 so how did that guy end up in prison for two years?

@Your Name Here the person you linked the video for may be too dense to benefit from it, but I'm not! thank you.

@Your Name Here the person you linked the video for may be too dense to benefit from it, but I'm not! thank you.

@JT1989 I n a fair world, you are right, it shouldn't....... but sadly in the world we live in, where many Cops are bias, aggressive for raises and better positions, etc, Saying even the most basic info (even while being innocent) can ruin your life.......  A quick example, if you tell the Cop that you were on 5th street from 8 to 10 pm shopping, if said crime they are investigating happened in the area, now they will use that in court, proving that you were very capable of committing the crime.......you would also be terrified what some jury members would take as fact vs coincidence....

@JT1989 How you can incriminate yourself? At 16:30 he says "if Im on a video camera" and then stops himself because he realizes how what he is saying can be interpreted. Its easy to misspeak when youre under pressure.

@JT1989 Still wrong, literally the best case scenario is that it doesn't help or hurt you at all. Worst case is something gets phrased misleadingly, or someone even just straight up misremembers what you said and it gets used against you.

As I said, the world is trutly shit. And you should shit on them at all cost. Don't stop fight keep your stamina high and persist and soon you will prove it

As I said, the world is trutly shit. And you should shit on them at all cost. Don't stop fight keep your stamina high and persist and soon you will prove it

Why a lawyer brings advantage? The whole world is manipulated by smart people.

Why a lawyer brings advantage? The whole world is manipulated by smart people.

Innocent people have gone to prison. That's all you need to know. Get a lawyer and keep your mouth shut. You have the right to remain silent and that's the FIRST STEP when being accused no matter how innocent you are.

@Your Name Here <br>And what's also horrible about that video is that the police guy at the end tries to say "but don't worry guys, I only get guilty people in my interrogation room" - even though videos like this one prove they interrogate innocent people just as often.

@Your Name Here
And what's also horrible about that video is that the police guy at the end tries to say "but don't worry guys, I only get guilty people in my interrogation room" - even though videos like this one prove they interrogate innocent people just as often.

@JT1989 "I don't have 45 minutes to watch a video" --> goes on to reply to all these comments with paragraph after paragraph xD<br>Either this guy was still very young and inexperienced, lives in a different country, or is just trolling everyone here.

@JT1989 "I don't have 45 minutes to watch a video" --> goes on to reply to all these comments with paragraph after paragraph xD
Either this guy was still very young and inexperienced, lives in a different country, or is just trolling everyone here.

@JT1989 Absolutely wrong. There's been numerous occasions where this has been proven wrong. The right to remain silent is there to protect the innocent.

@JT1989 Absolutely wrong. There's been numerous occasions where this has been proven wrong. The right to remain silent is there to protect the innocent.

@JT1989 There are many studies showing that under pressure, more people than you would think, will subtly give into intense interrogative pressure. In your mind it can the difference from a hard denial to admitting you are not sure or don't know. Some people crack under pressure and their survival instincts kick in, their only concern becomes getting away from the immediate threat.

@JT1989 how does one distinguish between a good, honest cop and one with bad intentions?

@JT1989 how does one distinguish between a good, honest cop and one with bad intentions?

@JT1989 I shoukd give you example of the 2nd case in this clip of why he should have a lawyer.

1- He had criminal record, that put him as primary suspect.
2- He inscriminated himself: he stated he did not know the girl then later on told them he knew if her. That is lying to the police
3- He stated 100% he did not go out of the house, now the police just need a witness to disprove that and bam, they can convince the jury.

He had given the police reason to be suspicious of him. If he had a lawyer, hevwould be adviced to state : he have never met the girl. That is it, zip, nothing else. He would be adviced to not say that he 100% had never stepped foot out side the house.

For the 1st case, the lawyer will ask to see the footage, the lawyer will asked to review the police call.

All in all, lawyer, no matter how crappy they are, know about law more than you. They will help you more than yourself

Well that's the messed up part. You can get a lawyer, but that takes much longer which means you'll be locked up longer.

Well that's the messed up part. You can get a lawyer, but that takes much longer which means you'll be locked up longer.

JT1989 lawyers go to school to realize how to respond to those questions they ask depending on their client. Whether or not you’re innocent is unknown to the Lawyer, they ONLY know they need to ensure you get out to get their job done. So even if they trick/deceive/lie, as long as you get out the lawyer wins. Having that on your side is a lot easier and beneficial than you doing it solo.

@JT1989 Ok but if you want an actual reply, that video is it. If you don't want to watch it, that doesn't make you right. It just makes you both wrong and uninformed.

@JT1989 Not in the american system.
The American system is generally built on the basis of the right to silence and the presumption of innocence when invoking that right.

In the British system, you would be correct, as negative inferences CAN be made at your refusal to answer questions in a timely manner.

In the British system, it is to your benefit to give as much information as you can as early as you can to plead your innocence because withholding information is seen as acting guilty, in the American system, your standard right is to withhold information as  information can always be twisted, but silence cannot.

If you don't like the way the American system is built, that is fine, but your claims are 100% false and the way the American system is built you simply should never speak to police without a lawyer to advise you. Good cop or not.

Also, you talk about good cops are ok, but what happens when this video is handed off to a DA? They get to make their own interpretations. It doesn't matter how good the cop is if you have a crummy DA twisting your words.

@SineEyed 2020 non white people get arrested way more though..

@SineEyed 2020 non white people get arrested way more though..

@Not A Strange Person I've been interrogated a bunch of times. I don't remember slipping up when I know they didn't have shit. I got angry as fuck as soon as they thought I knew more than I was telling them. Even when I was guilty I got that way. I don't like to be accused of things I know people don't have any evidence for, so I get mad very easily and go zero to a hundred on them and the issue is usually dropped once I get to where it looks like I might attack you for even saying it. lol The only way I would be calm is if they laid the evidence out in front of me. If they're just arguing back and forth and talking shit like they do have some, I'm not going to bite. I get pissed and go crazy on their ass and that works unless they have something. I don't like the same questions asked over and over again either when I've answered it the first time, so that could make me mad too. I get set off pretty easily in a confrontation like that even when guilty. I do that in most confrontations though with anyone that is accusing me of something or talking shit to me. I go zero to a hundred pretty quickly.

@JT1989 "if you tell the truth you should be fine" - in an ideal world, sure. But the world we live in is far from ideal. It isn't reasonable or even rational for you to be holding on to this position. You will never be able to make accurate predictions regarding the outcomes of real-world events by assuming them to comport to ideal standards. In doing so, you substantially increase the likelihood of making poor decisions. And in this context, poor decisions could very well lead to an indefinite loss of your freedoms.

Naivety has no place in matters of the law..

@JT1989 You openly admit your problem. . . Stop stating "your opinion" and watch the video. You're 100% wrong

@JT1989 You openly admit your problem. . . Stop stating "your opinion" and watch the video. You're 100% wrong

@Your Name Here yes, but part of my point is that if you tell the truth you should be fine.... And by telling the truth I don't mean confessing or pleading guilty to a crime you didn't commit....

JT1989 did you even see what this video is about dude ? I swear it says all

JT1989 did you even see what this video is about dude ? I swear it says all

@ng mui you can go ahead and put your race card away. This kind of thing happens to people regardless of the color of their skin..

@ng mui you can go ahead and put your race card away. This kind of thing happens to people regardless of the color of their skin..

@JT1989 In more than 25% of dna exonnerations, innocent people made incriminating statements, confessed, or plead guilty. Many studies also estimate 2-3% of people in prison are innocent. That number could be far higher.

Either way, why would an innocent person plead guilty or confess to a crime they didnt commit? Its as if police are just your friends who want nothing other than the truth and to help you out.

If you feel fine talking to police if youre ever a suspect for a serious crime go for it! And goodluck!

@Your Name Here my point the whole time has been if your innocent and you tell the truth, how can it be used against you? If they get you to say something you didn't mean to well that is another story. But they can't use truth as evidence against you when you are innocent .... I'm sorry but I don't have 45 minutes to watch a video. I am stating my opinion not trying to argue. I acknowledge that the video could change my view but I don't have time. None of you lot have been able to change my view so I'll leave this conversation here 👍🏼

no. if you are innocent, you should profess it. i have been accused 3 times for things i havent done. 2 times, i was able to be let go because the cops were not dumb enough to book me after i explained what happened. sadly the third time, the cop was just too stupid even after watching the video of me being innocent, booked me and i was held until bailed out. but eventually was let go because the accuser was too scared to lie in court so never showed up. being a nonwhite person can really suck.

@JT1989 Just watch the video instead of continuing arguing. Your questions would have been answered by now. One simple reason to not talk is everything you say can and will be used AGAINST you in a court of law. Nothing you say will be used FOR you. There is no reason to talk to police at all.

@where did ten's hair go what I mean is this thread, looks like a live chat because of recent comments.

@where did ten's hair go what I mean is this thread, looks like a live chat because of recent comments.

@yayayeye wdym live chat like how do u bring a live chat as evidence to court lol

@yayayeye wdym live chat like how do u bring a live chat as evidence to court lol

JT1989 it’s obvious now that you are a cop or detective somewhere with your line of thinking. The guy did NOT match the description of the suspect even as early as the initial calls went out. However, our trusted Law Enforcement entity decided to interrupt this innocent man’s life for that window of time. Forget about the $46,000 settlement as this would not be needed if the goddamn so called trained Law Enforcement entity would do their job in a diligent manner. Call it out for what is and that is Law Enforcement Entities makes more mistakes than the public will ever know. Mistakes that takes and changes lives.

@Gunther Hermann He didn't even watch this video here. It's clearly stated at 6:55 that the guy was wrongfully imprisonned for 2 years after saying the truth to the "honest police officer". Better be safe than sorry.

@JT1989 he didn't incriminate himself but udk how many ppl who are innocent are actually still called out as "guilty" til this day n still yet to be proven innocent. did u even watch the video "don't talk to the police"?? it's obvious u didn't n it literally answers n debunks everything you've said. besides, reminder that interrogators get more money the longer they interrogate, whereas the suspects gain nothing n is instead wasting more time (which in turns psychologically makes them more tense/anxious to end it quicker after being interrogated for hours straight). and the video that everybody has already pointed to u literally shows how despite u being innocent n talking about facts throughout the interrogation n not slipping up at all, u can still get arrested.

besides, the talking to the police would never EVER help u. the most it could do is just lesson ur sentence. u have the right to silence, use it. don't be extra

@Andrew Leighton officers use the technique of claiming they have damning evidence to get a reaction from the suspect. The fact that he was happy they had footage would be used as evidence for him that he is innocent. I admit the officer was not a good one but the guy was honest and was rightly found as innocent. He didn't incriminate himself

The detective claimed he had the footage of this guy committing the crime......why enlist a confession then if the officers motives where noble? The detective is POS only concerned with his career advancement at the expense of an innocent individual.

@JT1989 "lol I can't be bothered to watch the thorough and complete rebuttal to my foolish opinion"

Can I ask you a question? Is ignorance truly bliss?

@JT1989 "lol I can't be bothered to watch the thorough and complete rebuttal to my foolish opinion"

Can I ask you a question? Is ignorance truly bliss?

@Sikder Raish Mahmud obviously I believe that if you are going on trial you need a lawyer, what I am saying is, that if you get wrongfully arrested for a crime you didn't commit, talking to an honest police officer isn't going to get you in any trouble as long as you just tell the truth. If your innocent then your story is going to be the same whether you have a lawyer or not. I'm not sure what you could say that could incriminate you that wasn't a lie?

@JT1989 lol why do you think innocent people get thrown into jail then? you have a lawyer, you diminish the probabilty of getting falsely accused. you don't, you have very good chances of messing shit up like the examples the other commentators already given. If you still think, you'll be ok without a lawyer then it's you and good luck. but it's a prosecutor's job to prove you are guilty whether they think your are guilty or not. therefore, it's not recommended by professionals, at any point after an accusation to represent yourself, guilty or not. "truth" is not as black and white as you are thinking when laws involved.

Facts. I found out the hard way that don’t even be a victim without a lawyer. Was assaulted by this man years ago when I was a student and the cops said “why would a wealthy white man assault a student?” They then tried to make me confess that I was lying and saying “no one will ever know.” I refused to make the false confession and they had me come make a statement and read me my rights. I got a lawyer and the whole case went away, even the assault case against the guy. He is free to do it to others. I almost went to prison for being the victim.

@JT1989 Because you'll be able to get your story straight with the lawyer before talking to the police so you DONT slip up.  When you're getting interrogated they aren't trying to help you, they're trying to get you convicted.  This video is proof of this. They told the truth but were still seen to be guilty.

@JT1989 We live under an adversarial legal system. They don't want the truth, they want a conviction.

@JT1989 We live under an adversarial legal system. They don't want the truth, they want a conviction.

@The Leopard I ant really be bothered 😂 I take the point that if there's is a copper trying to make you guilty regardless then yeh, don't talk without a lawyer. But if you have someone reasonable, who wants to discover the truth, then you will be ok talking as long as you tell the truth

@JT1989 Go watch 'dont talk to the police' by regent law university, it will help you understand why even if your innocent and tell the truth why you shouldn't talk to the police.

@Not A Strange Person true but how does a lawyer help? Your still going to slip up. He can't predict what your saying and stop you from saying it...

@Not A Strange Person true but how does a lawyer help? Your still going to slip up. He can't predict what your saying and stop you from saying it...

JT1989 u may slip up. U can misremember due to the pressure, or just because ur memory is hazy. The police could poise questions meant to have u answer a certain way.

@Your Name Here how can you incriminate yourself if you only tell the truth?

@Your Name Here how can you incriminate yourself if you only tell the truth?

But if you are innocent and telling the truth, there's nothing that you can say that will incriminate you?

But if you are innocent and telling the truth, there's nothing that you can say that will incriminate you?


All they do is lie. But if we lie to them we're in deep.


Men, guilty until proven innocent.<br>Women, innocent until proven guilty.

Men, guilty until proven innocent.
Women, innocent until proven guilty.


They should make the interagator serve the same sentence or some sort of punishment


Yaasss!! I'm so glad that investigator got Justice's hand shoved up his rear in the end.


"I'll investigate this thoroughly"<br>Doesn't even read the suspect description

"I'll investigate this thoroughly"
Doesn't even read the suspect description

@VioletxPurple these cops spend so much time dealing with what they think are rats that are beneath them that it eventually affects their minds

I agree, that level of stupidity shouldn’t be demoted. He should have been fired with no chance of ever having a job related to the justice system

@Cake Hebenstreit incompetence and corruption in the police Union as well as answering to governments rather than the communities in which they serve are the core problems that need to be fixed but you aren't ready to hear that

@Captain America hmm I think there's a track record on display with these institutions.

@Cake Hebenstreit never attribute to malice what can be more easily explained by incompetence

@Florescentia that level of incompetence should get you fired not demoted that level and of incompetence does not belong in law enforcement it's why there is a problem in law enforcement those people don't get demoted they get fired because they get protected by a union that's corrupt is all f***

Doesn't he even need to show the "evidence"  he has on camera ? I mean if his video clearly doesn't show a black person ...

@Florescentia  The guy should have failed. This mistake will happen again and probably has happened many times in the past causing many innocents going to jail. Or maybe the officers were racist.

@Florescentia
Oh, well at least he lost his title, and pay. Meanwhile the falsely accused lost time, and had to face a traumatic hell.

Seems about even.

@Bozznian Bandz He should have went to prison?

@Bozznian Bandz should've been locked up himself

@Cake Hebenstreit that and probably because he just doesn’t give a fuck and wants that promotion. Instead he got demoted lol

He should be charged with the crime he tried to pin on him and locked up for the maximum sentence.

sus pect 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

sus pect 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

@Cake Hebenstreit It’s cops in general. They do that.

HOW DO YOU NOT LOOK INTO THE CASE BEFORE QUESTIONING SOMEONE what the heck...

@Florescentia should’ve lost his job. How the hell do you miss something so simple.


If only I had footage of how elizabethtown kentucky pd tuned me up on Thanksgiving only to not charge me and give my firearms back


An incompetent and overzealous officer. End of story.


You should be fired and possibly jailed if you wrongfully imprison someone.

@Bon Scott's Ghost 👻 Thank you for your kind words, just telling it like it is. Unfortunately most people refuse to truly hear the facts. It's also unfortunate that the people who are best qualified to hold public office don't want the job, as my belief is morally good and decent people don't want the kind of power that comes with it. It's pretty clear by looking at most politicians that only the greedy and morally depraved want to be politicians, with the exception of Ron Paul and a few others possibly.

No, you can't be fully accurate, change that to:
"Knowingly imprisoned someone"

Unless you'd like officers and detectives all be fired and jailed for a mistake they made, meaning they need more of them meaning, more inexperienced ones leading to MORE screw ups, and overall just making it worse for everyone

@frossbog your anecdote aside, more than half of rape allegations are false but yet the accusers don't get any real penalty

@Lavendar 13 Nor should they, as long as probable cause was present at the time of arrest.  Let's say there was an attempted robbery and the store owner tells dispatch the suspect was heading south in a blue Subaru Impreza.  You just happen to be driving a blue Subaru Impreza and are stopped 5 minutes later 3 miles south of the gas station.  Maybe you were late getting home and you were speeding.  Maybe you're on probation for criminal trespass 2 years ago.  That's probable cause and police are justified in arresting you as a person of interest.  It's a major inconvenience, but it was a reasonable arrest.

if you do so knowingly, sure... otherwise it's called a mistake and as much as it sucks, it does happen.

Detective work is hard. This is kinda over the top

Detective work is hard. This is kinda over the top

@Chris Green your answer to @reformed was one of the most honest and fair assessments of the facts about the current political climate that I have read especially in a random youtube comment thread. We need people like you to run for office. Articulate and honest.

It just happens it's a common mistake by both the authorities and the public

Isn't that what they would call kid napping?

Isn't that what they would call kid napping?

hate to be that guy but it's not that simple. I could get behind this if the law specifies that it only applies if you could have reasonably known the person wasn't guilty. Or rather didn't have enough evidence to convict him.

@wut dat logic do? Well said, no politician or political party should ever just blindly be given a pass. I can't even begin to explain all the reasons why that is a terrible idea. I could see questioning the accusations and researching them, especially considering the type of people we have as politicians, now and pretty much throughout the history of government, but it's just idiotic to blindly support and trust one just because they're part of the party you support or identify with.

@balls balls I don't like Trump either, but is anything he did actually worse than knowingly letting inmates die or rot away in prison just so you don't mess up your prosecution record? I don't think so. I know he's said some fucked up shit but cmon now, those are words. We're talking about lives being lost here. Years being wasted away by innocent people. I'm not trying to make a case for Trump I'm just saying, we shouldn't let our dislike or hatred for someone minimize others cruelty and evil doings.

@BumtheMustardMan don't waste your time, people like that don't care about facts. I guarantee you he gets all his information from CNN. no point in even trying dude.

@reformed I shouldn't even try to explain myself to you, since you obviously are the type of individual who can't even remotely think outside the party lines, and what the media pumps into your head, but for the fuck of it I'll give it a shot. I was actually a Bernie supporter, not Trump. While I'm not on a rampage, I suppose there is a pretty good chance that Trump might have actually won, seeing as how this country has a history of rigging elections, and the powers at be were DESPERATE to get someone in office that they could control, and Biden is the epitome of that. And though they try to sell him and Harris as politicians who care about "the little guy", he is also a corporatist, always has been. They definitely rigged the democratic primary so Biden would win, if not we would have had Bernie against Trump, as Bernie was a way more popular candidate than Biden, but like I said, control. While I don't like Trump, and don't agree with his policies, I can definitely see how people come to be Trump supporters after having dealings with people like you, who just scoop everyone you disagree with, or in this case, who's statement of fact you don't like??,  together into some blanket category, and when those people try to have an open minded discussion with you, you just spew out insults or more assumptions at them, never using any factual evidence to support your standings. Never forget, Trump would have never made it to office if the mainstream liberals and their blind, sheepish supporters hadn't turned their political agenda into a fucking shit show, and if your savior Obama hadn't done such a shitty job. All he had to do was not be as corrupt as all the rest of our former shit bag presidents were, but he couldn't even do that. But that's what happens when you vote based on identity politics, which dems so commonly do. Which brings me back to my point about that evil bitch Harris. Millions voted for her and Biden (who is one of the most blatantly racist politicians of all time) simply because she's black, or indian, depending on what crowd she's trying to appeal to. She got all those votes from people who claim to be opposed to injustice in the court system, and oppose harsh drug laws, although she commonly perpetuated both of those. As district attorney in San Fran or wherever it was she repeatedly jailed people, mostly minorities, for simple possession charges, even as small as marijuana, while handing out lengthy, mandatory minimum sentences (which wouldn't you know it! her man Biden signed into law with the crime bill). Not only that but she also blocked evidence from reaching inmates appeals in time, because she knew they'd win their appeal if that evidence ever saw a court room, and God forbid the truth get in the way of her prosecution record, not to mention all the free slave labor the state gets out of inmates, which she and her husband just so happen to benefit from, since they own stock in companies that contract out prison labor. And that's just the tip of the iceberg with her, she might as well run as a republican with all the support she used to show for border security and immigration laws. But like I said, when people vote solely on identity, like race in this case, it's never a good thing, and they don't see all the horrible things these candidates have done. You need to open your mind and start doing your research. Stop listening to these mainstream news stations who obviously craft whatever agenda they think will get them the best ratings. Just because you don't trust the news doesn't make you a Trump supporter, thats just a bullshit tag to put on people, that got started by, guess who, THE NEWS. Its hilarious how ya'll can be so critical and untrusting of the government when someone you don't like is in office, but when a liberal is in there, BAM! all the sudden the government can do no wrong, nothing is rigged or corrupt, in fact it's so honest and moral that you're not even allowed to question it anymore! Come on dude see it for what it is, I'm begging you. Open your eyes. Don't be afraid to look into something that doesn't seem right because you might be labeled as a conspiracy theorist by your own people. Fuck em. Even as someone who never liked Trump, I can admit that he was covered extremely unfairly by the media, as opposed to the cushy, preferential treatment they show Biden. If you can't see that then you're just an idiot and no one can help you, but if you do see it and just refuse to admit it then well.... you need to take a hard look at yourself and the type of person you are, and what honesty really means to you.

The issue with punishment for this is 2 things. First is that mistakes happen so this would have to have a trial based system. AN interesting idea is a peer review so that 2 officers are in charge of this. Ironically the solution to this is to fund the civilian section of the police which is the opposite of what both sides wish to do. The right wishes to militerise and the left whishes to defund. Of the irony.

@reformed Don't assume someone is a Trump supporter just because they criticize decisions made by our current administration. No one is above criticism, especially our elected officials, regardless of their political party. Haven't followed politics in a while, but if Kamala actually did this and the evidence proved the death row inmates innocence, she should face criminals charges. That's just wrong, no matter who you are.

Fired and then I’m jail for as long as that innocent person was there

@Dan S Well Batman says 'I'm Batman!' There, I quoted a fictional character too.

The judge is the last one to gobe the prison

The judge is the last one to gobe the prison

God says let them get what they tried to give them.<br>He should be sentenced with the crime he tried to pin on him.

God says let them get what they tried to give them.
He should be sentenced with the crime he tried to pin on him.

Never going to happen bc by law law enforcement agencies officials are legally able to make mistakes regardless of the matter

If that was the law, a lot of guilty people wouldnt be imprisoned

If that was the law, a lot of guilty people wouldnt be imprisoned

depends on how ridiculous the circumstance is.<br>if the suspect wasnt even the same race as the person being arrested they should def be fired. but it wouldnt be as bad if we were truly innocent until proven guilty cause right now its really the other way around.

depends on how ridiculous the circumstance is.
if the suspect wasnt even the same race as the person being arrested they should def be fired. but it wouldnt be as bad if we were truly innocent until proven guilty cause right now its really the other way around.

you should be punished with the same jail time that the innocent person was about to be charged with

You should serve the same<br>Amount of time the person you jailed served

You should serve the same
Amount of time the person you jailed served

@Krik 100% this. I never understood the blind faith in our politicians. I’m more of a Democrat but damn if just about every politician I’ve seen isn’t a garbage human in some way or another.

@reformed man i have such a strong hatred for trump and am glad biden won over him but she definitely did that.

@reformed I dislike Trump as much as the next guy but Kamala Harris is a bad person and she really did do that. There are terrible people on both sides of politics

They should be imprisoned for double the time the wrongfully accused was.

@reformed What's that? You want to talk about how Trump kept pushing for the death penalty for five black kids after they were proven innocent? Why, by all means!

@Kill me • 6 years ago na some guys spend 10-20 yrs in prison just to be acquitted that much later.. somebody should pay for that, you literally robbed someone of a chunk of their life. That'll make the govt make sure they have the right person instead of just trying to get a conviction

@reformed Listen man, I'm a biden supporter, but that dudes corect

@reformed she literally did that though. It's not even up for debate. She straight up did that.

false accusations don't even have penalty

false accusations don't even have penalty

@Chris Green you're on a trump won cope rampage. lol

@Chris Green you're on a trump won cope rampage. lol

Fired for sure, jailed if the charge is for murder an gets the innocent person killed/executed

straight up. def fired. and jailed for sure if you knew they were innocent and pushed forward anyway. like when kamala harris blocked evidence from an appeal for a guy on death row.


Cops wonder why people don't trust them when this kinda shit goes down


I love sweden where i live where its innocent until proven guilty not the other way around


Hmmm a real head scratcher on why they thought it was him🧐👨🏾🦲


Micheal was super cool I feel sad for these kinda people


It’s sad because when cops misidentify people; instead of admitting their faults and letting them go they then try their hardest to convict them and get them to admit to a crime they didn’t convict.

Here in Utah, they literally have an arrest quota. That speaks for itself on how unconstitutional that is

They just refuse to even entertain the idea that maybe, just maybe, they might have made a mistake

@Simon Foged he was described as a white...small man- not to mention he said false things many times

@Even TheObsolete ill take that as you being unemployed, what a position to call someone lazy from

@empty windex bottle refilling windex bottles

@Even TheObsolete oh they are lazy? What job has you got then?

@Even TheObsolete Bruh he got 46k for just 3 jail days

@cyderoc aka lucianboy so true also the guy interrogating the Black guy was trying to get a confession on no evidence which would get him promoted

That's true ....just filling their quotas.

@Simon Foged how is it a tough job? they got the wrong person and first guy isnt even close to what they were after

@Lazy Rat Both innocent, one is just an extrovert and one an introvert, on top of the introvert being careful knowing he is a tall Black man in Canada and things could go bad if he got angry, and the white guy not wanting to go back to prison on a false charge.

I'm going to sound dumb for asking this bc I didn't pay too much attention to the video, but who was the guilty one? The first guy or the second guy? Or are they both innocent?

@Simon Foged it’s really not, perhaps asking the first man where he was at the time of the crime and checking the bus video instead of consistently lieing to him and showing no interest in actually investigating, and for the second guy.. shit, call his momma..?  If you can’t get evidence without deceiving and coercing then you’re a shitty investigator. Perhaps assume there innocent until you can prove they are guilty… I think there’s a law somewhere about that🤦♂

@Simon Foged “small white male” yeah let’s bring in the 6 foot black man hahaha

@Simon Foged bruh, its in the name. investigator. if they dont know who did it they should, idk, investigate perhaps? not accuse someone and blatantly lie and then leave the man locked up for 3 more days until another investigator does his job for him? it is indeed a tough job which is definitely the reason why the dude got demoted.

@Simon Foged if an officer gets a call about a white male then goes out and arrests a black male then I’m sure he’s aware that he effed up

@Simon Foged Evidence is key. It’s innocent until proven guilty. In most cases where they get the correct person they actually have evidence for it and there’s tell tale signs someone is guilty which none of the people showed. It’s what JCS’ channel is about. Usually guilty people don’t react like either of these people.

How should they know tho? All criminals will try to prove that they're innocent. It's a really tough job for the investigators


No, that is not a Cop's Duty. He's not a Judge.


"Investigator" was demoted...lol, he wasn't an investigator, as the nitwit didn't investigate anything...he was clueless and could've easily ruled out this innocent man if he had done the bare MINIMUM of actually investigating something...clown just sat there, lied to an innocent person, and already had the guy judged guilty...he's apparently not that bright, but seems to be proud of it...at least he's now an example of how NOT to do things...lol...

that’s why people should always have a lawyer tbh. you’re up against someone who you legally can not lie to, but they can lie to you.


I've been watching this channel for a while now, but I did NOT expect to hear my hometown mentioned! (Hamilton, ON)


Immediately lawyer up please especially if you are innocent.


This detective needs to be sent back to training asap. He's clearly inept.

Assuming US police are ever even trained LMAO

Assuming US police are ever even trained LMAO

@Jared
Unfortunately the police forces of almost every single nation on this planet remain corrupt because there are many in places of power like your self who professionally obfuscate extremely simple straightforward matters like these in order to keep sociopathic bullies in uniform.
SMH 🤦 .

@Jared
An “uncertain situation...”?????
The very first report of the crime referenced a short man. I think it was a short white man. This was the very very first report of this particular crime. I don’t need to hear anymore. Any normal human being would have said “hmm...this already looks fishy. Let me do the smallest look into this before I try to put an innocent man behind bars breaking up his entire family in the process.”

Somebody should even be demanding All arresting officers to give an explanation why someone who is a million miles away from resembling the reported suspect was even arrested.

Your analysis is astounding.
You are making excuses for criminals with power.
I am so very happy you was not in charge of this case.

The thing that was the most shocking is he said that there was going to be court in the morning which I bet there was but because they just gave him APD he was instantly fouled guilty of the crime and another detective I'd bet heard him at the hearing and was like I bet something's not adding up did his due diligence and got a free man exonerated. Suspended without pay what a joke that's like being in school and getting an in school suspension it's not the best but it's the best of the worst

@Paulo Mangano  That's right never forget the police are more of a strong arm for the elites than they are for us common peasants.

@Banger if that’s what he was trained to do why did he get demoted and suspended without pay

@Viral Leaks I'm not going to pretend to be more certain about the unknowns of this situation than I am just to virtue signal some ideological conformity.  I'm just trying to think openly with nuance and am giving my opinion on what I see in this video and some theorizing of the purpose of a mild interrogation when the detective is uncertain.  I also noted that I agree that if the detective willfully ignored the suspect description then I think he should be fired, and if he simply forgot to review the suspect description,  he deserves to be reprimanded and made to be tested for his knowledge of procedures.

I think the man that was subject to the questioning showed really strong intelligence and character,  I'd like to be friends with him.

@Tye Tyes I would agree with you in cases where a detective or prosecutor presses the case even when the evidence says otherwise and they push it to conviction when they ought to know better or don't really believe they have the roght guy.  This detective seems to have had an uncertain situation (that he could have found more doubt on if checking the original suspect description) and was going to press the guy they arrested to see if guilt came out or an admission or if he convincingly defends his innocence.  That's not necessarily wrong,  so long as they don't continue to bluff or put the guy through undue restraint of freedom rather than quickly check out the story and evidence.  So far from what we see in this video,  the detective not following procedure of checking the initial call is worthy of reprimand,  but him bluffing is not necessarily going too far so long as it turns out he didn't willingly ignore evidence that showed this could not possibly be the guy.  So I don't know what happens next,  or if he willingly ignored the initial suspect description,  that will confirm whether this detective engaged in something fireable or just being warned and made to go through testing on correct procedures again.

I will give him a bit of forgiveness in that he softened his tone at the end to be like "ok,  we'll get to the bottom of this I promise you that"  instead of maintaining full certainty of "I know you're guilty" bluff.  Part of the reason he did bluff was to apply pressure in hopes that a truly guilty person would crack.

"The interrogator and 3 other investigator's were demoted without pay"<br>Love me some happy endings

"The interrogator and 3 other investigator's were demoted without pay"
Love me some happy endings

this detective should get fired and never come back.

this detective should get fired and never come back.

Both were inept. None of the interviews were convincing of guilt.

I just want to stress the nature of such criminality.Anyone so immoral that they frankly don’t care about breaking up families and robbing people of their freedom will find a way to be a bully or abusive in another way once opportunity presents. Such people only being “fired” literally proves to them how much power they literally have.

An abusive, criminal asshole with no regard for others is still just as sociopathic in a new job. In however many “new” jobs.  For me this is like watching a paedophile and just saying “oh, just fire him.” Nah. PRISON!

Taking years of freedom off families of others is either evil or sociopathic. It is literally the same as any other crime.

Notably kidnapping.

Straight prison. Anything less cheapens the crime and tells society that it is somehow okay to destroy families in a way that is utterly evil.

And it tells other cops that doing this is not that big of a deal so long as you don’t get caught.

These are crimes against humanity.

Police have the ability to lie
To obtain a confession

However
They cannot lie
To obtain a false confession

Meaning:
If the police know a suspected person didn’t commit a crime
But they lie about having evidence against said person to make them falsely confess

Sent back to training??
Hell no.
Try prison.
No one should be trained to not lie, and to not put innocent people in prison.
These are crimes against humanity done by criminals who should immediately be locked up.

Yeah, I can't say definitely after watching one clip, but he does not come across as a fair or competent investigator.

@Miss Awsum he isn’t the one keeping him in though. He was probably just told to go in and act like he did the crime. It’s the stations and cops fault that he was kept without evidence

@jayyy I do understand to an extent but he still kept him in without any real evidence, he even had an aliby.

No he should have been fired, and maybe even pay some or even all the money that the man got or just go to prison himself.

He's not inept, he's corrupt. He didn't do the things he did because he is incompetent, he lied and knew exactly why.

Inept, corrupt? He's just doing his job.

The problem is his job goes against the interests of any working or poor person, and anyone decent

There is a difference between inept and corrupt

There is a difference between inept and corrupt

He needs to be fired and banned from every joining the force again

@Gummie Bear true. I saw it more as the officer knew he was innocent but was trying to get info out of him since people usually remember more when their life’s on the line. But yeah I think ur right.

@jayyy Yes, they are taught to lie to get something from investigation. My problem isn't with that kind of lying. The real lying was the officer said he would look into what the man was saying. Yet, the officer didn't do any other aspect of their job. It took a second officer to actually do the first officer's job to prove the first guy was innocent. The proof of innocence as all over the place, starting with the very first bit of evidence. They were looking for a white man, lol. So no, this cop didn't do their job, and if the second officer did the same lazy policework, then the innocent man would be in prison.

He needs to be a forklift driver and break merchandise, not break people’s lives and time.

@Gummie Bear I’m guessing your talking bout the 1st person right

@Gummie Bear that’s his job bro. Their taught to lie and act like the person was already proven guilty so if they actually did it or know who did it they might confess.

@Banger By lying and not following up on a case? The cop said he was going to charged for a crime, yet did no investigating? Sorry, but the officer's actions aren't "trained."

Training implies that this detective has the capacity to learn, which I humbly doubt

@Sandra lied, falsely detained, police misconduct, the officer should have been put in prison.

Fired. If a cop tried to take your freedom away, you'd want him fired, and charged. He lied.

Should he even be allowed to be a government employee after that?


Basic due diligence without assumptions goes a long way.


What kinda guy you are. - It's like an interwiev for job application xD


In India it is the opposite, that id "Innocent until proven guilty"


Dude that was such a badass move when he called his bluff and basically  said “you know what, I don’t think you have a video camera. I think you’re just saying that to see how I’ll react.”
And then suddenly the cop becomes less accusatory and goes “well do know I do believe the truth is paramount...”
It’s almost like that is when the cop realized “uh oh, I have the wrong guy, I’m fucked” lmao.

crazy how interrogators are allowed to lie about anything

Yeah that's only something you say when you can actually think clear haha

If he had the slightest idea - which he absolutely should have based on this guy’s behavior - he would have checked whatever proof they had to begin with, such as the simple description of the actual suspect. Let alone the fact that they were chasing a suspect and then instead arrested someone calmly getting off a bus further proves that he 100% deserved the demotion and suspension. As a detective you have to be just as ready for your suspect to be innocent as to be guilty and it was almost embarrassing how this guy just straight up the bat accused him and didn’t give him any room to admit to things that could have been potentially used in court against him (not in this particular case obviously).

it was badass, but surely useless, and it could've been really bad for him. He already know the vdeo doesn't exist, and his hierarchy knows it too, even for legal issues, it was already stated that he had one, which he would have to answer in a trial, so there was literally no point of him doing that, besides pissing off the dude that would make his life miserable for as long as possible.<br>But it's pretty beautiful to see the detective shaking off and changing the subject immediately afterward.

it was badass, but surely useless, and it could've been really bad for him. He already know the vdeo doesn't exist, and his hierarchy knows it too, even for legal issues, it was already stated that he had one, which he would have to answer in a trial, so there was literally no point of him doing that, besides pissing off the dude that would make his life miserable for as long as possible.
But it's pretty beautiful to see the detective shaking off and changing the subject immediately afterward.


for whatever reason detective didn't follow protocol? The reason was pretty damn clear.


Hell yea buddy didn’t know he was about to get 46 bands otherwise he’d probably be a lot more happy during that


This is the perfect example of why police shouldn't be allowed to rely on false evidence to try to get a confession. Implying the existence of evidence to judge a suspect's response is one thing, but repeatedly lying to the accused over and over again is just gaslighting and may well result in a false confession.


"Whether you did it or not isn't up for discussion" um, isn't that the entire purpose of having a trial? Those cops should be thrown in prison.

A trial is meant mostly to figure out what the sentence will be and what type of punishment is going to be done.

If there’s a bunch of a evidence stacked against a subject, then them questioning whether or not they did it is unnecessary. Basically, if the detective knows for a certainty that the suspect is guilty, then they wouldn’t ask anything related to this.

They said that to me when accusing me of taking alcohol into a school. I didn’t.

@Lulu Bugz poc have the most privileges in america lol

it's a method of getting a confession from the accused. He's trying to bluff and say that they have hard evidence and then tells him he made a mistake and it happens to everyone and how he can make it right by confessing. The whole purpose of this is for a confession. This is standard procedure of an interrogation unless you invoke fifth amendment and ask for lawyer (which you should always do coz literally everything you say can be used against you). So basically even if you are innocent you have to go through this and because of this about 25% of proved innocent people have confessed after interrogation coz it's quite draining and they make it seem like confessing is the best option you have even if it's clearly not if you are innocent

@Clint CatesIt's not about getting the right person. All they want is to close the file with a conviction so it goes under "Crimes solved" and makes the figures look good so they can justify their budget. That's why so many people who plead guilty get a good deal if they have several other T.I.C.s when they are sentenced. It allows the police to close the books on those crimes too.

On the last case: I'd like to know how many man hours of investigation went into figuring out he wasn't the suspect. What is it about the police that they'll take the time and energy to brow beat a confession instead of investigating. It doesn't matter who we get as long as we get someone?

Yeah exactly and the fact that the cop tried to backpeddal later and say(lie) that he would look through evidence and try to confirm or deny the dudes story as if he hadn't just told him his innocence was out of the question. Absolutely spineless

@louise yes it definitely is. Very sad and many people don’t know about these atrocities….

@Lulu Bugz Well that starlite tours sh*t just blew my mind. and I thought the pigs in my country were bad. but the "I don't care if you did it or not, I'm going to fit you up anyway as it's easier than doing my job" sort of police attitude is pretty much the same everywhere.

@Jason Edward Ledbury no problem ! <br>And.... Yes it is.

@Jason Edward Ledbury no problem !
And.... Yes it is.

@Vastelous
Yes, I understand that was the reason for your comment -- mine was just to explain why I asked for clarification.

But I understand what you mean. It's true Canada isn't all rainbows and sunshine, and only people who want to see it that way will continue to, after living here for any significant amount of time.
Yet the same goes for every single place in the world, even if not all of them have the same clean reputation as Canada; whenever people create a fantasy in their mind about somewhere, they'll ignore the bad stuff that goes on there. They either make up an excuse in their minds for the problems, or ignore them completely.

I will say one thing though:
I don't know what your own experiences have been, but I hope you won't let the bad ones completely overshadow the positive ones. There's a lotta crap that goes on in every nation, and all we can do is try to make ours better in whatever way we can.

@A. Luiza no its just people think canada is all nice nice but that isn't true

@Vastelous
Ah okay, thanks for clearing that up ;p
Some people from the other parts of the world tend to think Toronto and/or Ontario = all of Canada. So, as someone who has lived in 2 western provinces (B.C and Alberta), I sometimes feel the need to advocate for the rest of Canada. Heh.

@A. Luiza I worded that wrong. Toronto one of the largest citys. one side of toronto is a bunch of neighborhoods nothing fancy. And downtown Toronto as people call it is full of large buildings and is pretty big. It's full of pretty crazy people and a very toxic environment.

@Vastelous
"downtown canada"?
I didn't know entire countries with multiple cities could be considered one single town....

Okay but seriously, plz elaborate.

it's wrong here because the cop didn't review shit however if they have hard evidence...

Άγγελος Μορίκης

Some of them are just as bad as the criminals they're supposed to apprehend, just on the otherside.

@sleepn_on_me247 I’m sorry bruh . It is so disturbing. 😩

@sleepn_on_me247 Yes, mostly. But like I said the police have been lied so who knows really if it happens on other provinces . They did this to kids also.... one of the victims was only 16 and I might just point out this is an especially excruciating death and many were tortured as well beforehand . It’s horrific .

@Lulu Bugz you just made me more mad n upset

@Lulu Bugz 30 miles!?!?!?!? Thats for sure death jesus<br>Wtf

@Lulu Bugz 30 miles!?!?!?!? Thats for sure death jesus
Wtf

@sleepn_on_me247 star lite tours in Canada were always known to the First Nations and Métis communities ...it was not secret but the police had always denied this horror was actually happening.
The RCMP would pick up ( read... kidnap) First Nations individuals in the middle of winter , drive them off to frigid cold , soaking wet , strip them naked leave them to walk back into town sometimes 30 miles or more In -30 degrees or colder. Of course they froze to death .The police always denied this until they picked up 4 people , (one who was 8 months pregnant) but they somehow survived... this forced an investigation and the police chief was forced to admit this had been going on since the 70’s and they really didn’t know how many people they did this to bc it was done so often.

To this day we still don’t know how many people have been murdered this way and the police officers who did this were never charged with a crime most are still on the force today.

Sorry for the paragraph.

Im from ukiah, california.
Im not familiar with canadian laws
But i heard it’s beautiful in canada

@Lulu Bugz what i really meant was due process clause
Its like the 5th or 4th amendment in the US
Does canada have a constitution?

@Lulu Bugz nah
Canada as in
You know what i dont even know what i was sayin
Im straight talkn out my ass
My bad

@sleepn_on_me247 so... racism doesn’t exist in Canada? What are you saying?


That interrogator apparently did not keep his promise to look at the alibis.. it was some other officer. What a dirt bag. The ending was happy one thank God. I was questioned and put in cuffs 3 times in the States. I grew up in Europe and like to go out for walks and don't always drive everywhere. The cops told me I matched the disrcription of someone twice and the third time someone called because I was out jogging in my work boots and normal clothes and they thought it was suspicious haha.


“ Did she see you sleeping at that time “ what a dumb question I don’t know I was asleep


These videos will be studied for years yet it’s free content, like a library.


where did the other videos go?? I want to do another rewatch


officers shouldn’t be allowed to lie like this i can only imagine the amount of people who’ve had nervous breakdowns and admitted to something they didn’t do

@Junior Juniorr yes, it is not that simple. Except with break their mental down and torture, thats real at least in my country

@Junior Juniorr You don't need to directly admit to it. It's enough that you say or mention something, that can be used against you and interogators know exactly how to pressure and question you to get something.

in Sweden there was like 20 years ago 3 kids on a pier... youngest drowned and the 2 twin brothers(who were innocent, the kid fell in) was pretty much forced to admit to the things in interrogation since they were like 5 and scared

I thought the same when the detective in the other video said, they have XRAY technology to see through houses walls, I was like LOL

@Junior Juniorr some studies have shown that after around 8-10 hours of straight interrogation people can be coerced into confessing to crimes they did not commit.  Remember these officers have every psychological tool in the book and they will use them all to break people-they are not your friend .

@Phiusmes I highly doubt 1 in 3 inmates are innocent. Tone that number down about 95%

@Junior Juniorr seriously watch the confession tapes on Netflix. It’s not “easily”, it’s after consecutive hours, days, weeks of interrogations which are made to break you psychologically, it can happen to anybody.

A lot of times when they’ve done this method it does help find the guilty party.

@Junior Juniorr the central park 5 dude they were children at the time too. Its real easy to force people into confessions when you use disgusting tactics

This kind of interrogation is illegal on paper in plenty of civilised European countries albeit I'm sure some of the more severe investigations don't go by the book.

Victims of narc abuse will be convinced they did it this way…. It is basically narc abuse all Over again…. When I watch these videos I feel I done it but just don’t rem it…. I can not imagine what it must feel like to sit through hours of this abuse….

@Junior Juniorr don't speak on shit you know nothing about because shit like that happens more then you'd think

@Username agreed, except that you will often be arrested and booked before you can talk to an attorney and by then your life has been changed profoundly

@Caleb no, it's not a joke, basically half of those that confessed under duress are likely to be innocent, but I don't have the statistic on what that number is.

@Phiusmes lmfao that’s a joke right?  You think 1 out of every 3 people in jail are innocent?

this is what Japanese police do, it’s really messed up, it’s called the reid technique. You make it seem like they’ll be doing the right thing by confessing

@Phiusmes "probably a third." Can I get some sauce with that pasta? Or was that just a wild opinion you threw out there without any credible sources?

Actually people admit to crimes they didn’t do all the time when you apply pressure. Vsauce did a video on it.

@Phiusmes ehhhh let’s be realistic thats definitely an overestimate… HOWEVER yeah ur right there are TOO many cases like this

@justcomments It's not even that, I've seen interrogations where they just wear a man down until he's just ready to say anything, believing the cops that repeating their lie will make things easier for him. The man, after experiencing a traumatic situation, such as a loved one getting murdered, is not thinking clear during these interrogations, but also doesn't even consider getting a lawyer, because he thinks that he's just helping with the investigation. It's very sad and scary. Even when you're called in as just a witness, always ask for a lawyer and don't volunteer any information, no matter how useful you think it is and what a great helping citizen you want to be, at the end all they want is to close the case ASAP and if you're seen as weak, they'll pin the crime on you, even if you've had nothing to do with it.

I could understand admitting to something you didn’t do if you’re convinced you’ll be found guilty either way. You might plead guilty to get a lighter sentence, since you feel you can’t change anything else

Many people do, there are plenty of documentaries on this. Probably a third of all inmates are innocent

it is not that simple dude, nobody is going to admit a crime that easily


bruh I was in the middle of watching all your vids again


I was accused of a lot of shit at boarding school by other students, worst was apparently I copied someone elses music on a hard drive off someone's laptop (this was 2008), even though I had never been in their study room. It was pretty traumatizing having 6-7 guys surrounding my bed at 10pm at night, not believing a word I said and threatening me with violence. I was in tears, and I still remember that shit to this day.


Prime example… don’t trust police, & get an attorney.


I was wrongfully convicted and the officer tried everything in his power to make me say I did the crime, all I can say is at 17 it’s hard to remain calm during something that insane.

I was talked into admitting something "disorderly conduct" by my probation officer. He offered three days community service to have it dropped, I knew I had did nothing. My dad sided with him because he believed it would be way easier than going to courts which I "had 0 chance in as it was already all stacked against me" according to my probation officer. It's intimidating, especially being introverted and anti-situational. I know it's not a big charge, but the fact that they are able to lie, intimidate, exaggerate, and destroy peoples dignities/lives is fucked.

@Grilled Leeks i mean..... he said “wrongfully” so i would assume not lol

I'm so sorry you had to go through that, I hope you're doing alright man.

I'm so sorry, that's absolutely terrible.


it's almost like it's supposed to be innocent until proven guilty but they don't get paid if no one gets arrested


anyone else feel so pissed off watching this video, like if i was the colored innocent guy i would say show me the footage because i would be in absolute awe


Thank god they got demoted and suspended no pay. <br>a true punishment, not that suspended on paid leave shit

Thank god they got demoted and suspended no pay.
a true punishment, not that suspended on paid leave shit


how michael managed to stay calm is beyond me, i would’ve flipped the fuck out.

@Lament of False facade 2.0 he spoke to the police without an attorney present. That was a bad move.

@Micah Turner I'm happy to see that his composure is so great I would not be as calm I would be flipping out probably calling the cop racist and all kinds of shit

@Mikkel Olsson I was talking about the guy with white shirt, the first one...

I was simply praising the guy for being calm, even I wouldn't be able to do that considering I've punch my dad in the skull and almost broke it out of anger.

Then again I had history of violence when I was a child so that may say something.

@Lament of False facade 2.0 Did u even watch the video? Go back to watch what he said about the guy with the beard and how its almost impossible to "act" like he did...

he hadn’t been in this position, he trusted the system not to imprison him without evidence and he knew he didn’t do it

@Jookie That set in when he realized "he wouldn't be going home" after that interogation.

He’s introverted and I’m not sure that the fact that he might have to spend a lot of time in jail has completely set on him

That would only make things worse if he wasn't calm, he did the right thing.

The last thing you want to do in this types of situation is to loose your self out of frustration.


he should have asked to see the tape if they supposedly had it. why didn't he do that?


It's always been guilty till you can prove your not. They are not called Terror Police for fun


I just came across this video. Took me by surprise, considering I live right downtown Hamilton. Very familiar with the locations.


The investigators should have been fired, not just suspended.

Are you joking ? In normal case scenario, the innocent accused has to go all the way of the process to protect the public image of the police and prosecutor. That was very rare case the investigator was disciplined

And the victims of their incompetence/evilness should have been able to sue the shit out of their departments.

And charged. Then convicted. Then imprisoned.

@Connor Modin Yeah good thing to thing it was on Canada

@User name it was unpaid this time at least

they need to arrest them. They're disrespecting the badge.

Justice system: best I can do is paid vacation


Woah!   What's going on?  Why are all your videos disappearing?


I just got accused the same way as him, it's a terrible feeling, currently on trial shit sucks. Hopefully I'll have a civil suite


This stuff honestly makes my gut ache. I feel so awful for these people, their lives were changed so suddenly and for no reason, like Justin. He seems like a normal guy.

Edit: YESSSS YOU GET THE BAG MICHAEL!!! I’m so glad he got money and those stupid investigators were demoted. What a shit situation

$46k for 3 days "work". It's not all hardship.

Fudge Fudge he seemed so proud that he was able to stay out of jail only to be put back in completely innocent. He did his time and he understood the crime, and now he’s getting punished
Investigators really need to be trained better, this all could’ve been solved way earlier by ASKING THE MOTHER WHERE HE WAS or fact checking the story but not two years later

Fudge Fudge he seemed so proud that he was able to stay out of jail only to be put back in completely innocent. He did his time and he understood the crime, and now he’s getting punished
Investigators really need to be trained better, this all could’ve been solved way earlier by ASKING THE MOTHER WHERE HE WAS or fact checking the story but not _two years later_

I hope that Justin guy gets money, too. Even though.. I don't think that helps much. You saw his panic at the prospect of being incarcerated. 2 fuckin years til they figured shit out? Fuck the justice system.

dude I'll spend 3 days in jail for $50k in damages any fucking day of the week


Id say the system is broken but its functioning exactly as planned.<br>A fucking CAB

Id say the system is broken but its functioning exactly as planned.
A fucking CAB


That is pathetic. To hold someone for 3 days who is innocent and not even giving you trouble. The law needs to be better able to protect innocent persons.


This question might sound highly ignorant, but are police actually permitted to lie to you about evidence in order to get a confession?


Justin Kendall did beat this case but was immediately locked up again for Burglary  9/28/16 - 5/18/21.  He is now currently locked up AGAIN for burglary, 12/02/21 - 11/01/22.   Hate to say it but he might have did this one lol


The tall black man falsely accused of robbery is so polite and respectful that he actually thanked the interrogator for wrongly incarcerating him. That man deserves a lot more money and a huge apology.

@Peter Gaard that's a lot of money to you and I, but for the guy that was scared to death thinking maybe he was going to prison for years, for a total of 3 days, may not be lot to him. that could cause lots of mental issues real quick. this guy should be studied on how calm he handled being falsely charged. any man that has that kind of composure should be respected.

@theawesome1rjc  he isnt a pushover. When will people stop blaming tje victim.
1) he has anxiety.
2) he's black and he probably knows about the way black people are treated by cops. If he gets annoyed or angry they might see it is aggressive behaviour and call him hostile which makes it worse for him
3) he is in a terrifying situation right now and is probably panicking on the inside. So it may be easy for you to sit there judge him about what he did but things would probably different when ur actually in the situation.
So have some empathy and stop blaming the victim

So glad what happened to those investigators happened.

@Esteban Outeiral Dias sorry I forgot to write his name. Is that ok Mr. Comment Poilce? 🤷♂🤣

"tall black man" ? Shit I forgot black men don't have names right.

@sweateryoshi  It's obvious the British interrogator is either wearing an earpiece, or it flashed forward.... because you can tell the exact moment when he realises the ridiculous mistake they made....his tone switches on a dime from "your guilt is not even up for debate" to "I give you my word I will investigate this"

Crazy tits situation......

What did that bearded fellow get for 2 fucking years????? Huh?? At 15k a day he should be at over 10 fucking million , but the other guy like damn i wish a stayed longer

46k for 3 days ? I bet he actually happy this all happened

This was honestly the most infuriating part of the video. Poor guy.

@sweateryoshi As someone with the same issues, I think you hit the nail on the head. Getting out of the situation quickly is the one thing I would be thinking about in that situation. It's also shown by the way he just gets completly defeated when he realizes he won't get a chance to "retreat", and will be forced to stay. It says everything. Social interactions can be exhausting and sometimes you just need to get out to be able to take a breath.

He also immediately starts to think about the social ramifications of what is happening... almost more concerned with what his co-workers will think when he doesn't show up rather than about the potential jail time he's facing. You could interpret that as him being a stand-up guy... but I know from my own experience it's most likely completely selfish. More of a way to avoid the social interactions that would naturally follow after something like this as much as possible.

@Nervous Sips actually you are right. I would never literally tell anyone to resist police even if you are in the right because that is just plain stupid. You have to remember though this was In Canada not the US. Nevertheless i was wrong to say that because even if you are in the right, fighting or resisting the police will ALWAYS just add charges on to your original charge and make thing much worse for the person resisting police.

@MrShaneobueno Snodgrass you are the reason why people get shot by cops. You should never resist. If he would have resisted he would have been arrested for that and it would have stuck.

@D W Agreed. No amount of money is going to remove the fear, anxiety helplessness, and phobias from this traumatic life event. Moreover, it was “only” 3 days after the fact. At the time, he was looking at years of wrongful incarceration. Everyone’s greatest nightmare.

@sweateryoshi yes I'm diagnosed with General Anxiety but I get it in social interactions probably just as much. That's why I felt so bad for him because I know how it is to just go along with something and agree just so I dont have to face conflict. I can definitely relate to that because most people would get so mad. I'm not sure what I would do in his situation but I respect how humble he is but I know and so do you that it's a fine line of being humble and cooperative and just letting people walk all over you..

@MrShaneobueno Snodgrass but you see he also could have gotten shot and killed instead of being beaten up. And yes it takes a lot of humility to treat them with such calmness and respect when they didn't show him any and it says a lot about who he is as a person, he's better than all those policemen combined and they should have gotten fired instead of just note receiving no pay for a while. Also have their past arrests checked up.

@Sailor saturn he should of resisted, let them beat the hell of him and then could of won millions in lawsuit money.i dont like when people try to get lawsuits out of everybody because they're lazy and dont want to work. But this guy didnt do anything wrong at all and still treated those police with respect. That takes a lot of humility.

I think it's sort of like he's black and he knows they won't treat him as civilly as the interrogator did if he got aggressive, if he had resisted arrest he would have been hurt and then this guy would not have been as nice either and I'm taming all of this a lot

You wanna go look up some criminal statistics? ;)

@Peter Gaard you wont understand tel placed in his situation

@Peter Gaard I see what you're saying. Somethings are just hard to put into an amount of currency I guess.

idk... $46,000 for the cost of 3 full days? That's quite the paycheck. That's $15,000/Day!

@Wesley Ferguson Canadian cops deal with everyone the same? So...every person Canadian cops arrest, ends up incarcerated for 3 days, then found to be innocent, wins $46,000 civil suit?  Wow. That IS excellent treatment of everyone!

@Satan this isnt america dude..... cops here deal with everyone the same 🙄 alot of officers arent even white. Smh

The policeman should be in jail actually, the one that arrested him and the one carrying the interrogation.

@Satan  yeah that's what I was thinking. It felt like he has had to deal with this kind of thing before.

@Erika Price I'm not old enough to drink but I'll take some Root Beer if you've got any

@YC L not at all! Especially in a world gone mad. K cheers 🍻

@Erika Price ....is it wrong that I find this funny? Poor guy


In America, the last investigator would have swept this under the rug and the man would've spent 10 years in jail. Canada AT LEAST "demotes and reprimands"


cops who arrest innocent people should be charged with assault


It;s a good thing that man was set free, and those officers were arrested. May the officer who looked into this case with a different perspective live hapilly and freely.

The officers were demoted and suspended without paid, not arrested. You really think police arrest their own that easily? Lmao


Isn’t crazy you’re guilty until proven innocent. If a man is innocent until proven guilty then the man wouldn’t be placed into a cell with people who are in there for murder. Wouldn’t be placed into a cell at all until proven guilty.