I hate nothing more than people being wrongly accused of something they didn’t do

Lady should be given life in prison.

She was willing to ruin his life and take it away, so take hers away

Yep, I agree with you. There are three thing I hate the most. Being unloyal, stealing, and false accusations and imprisonments.

now imagine getting the death penalty for a crime you didn't do, fucking crazy

@Lewis this is a troll to annoy hin right? Lol

Then why did you say people should be sent to prison before they commit a crime?


I would probably take three days in jail for $45,000.


wowwwww what a nice gentle man damn so sad


Demoted and suspended yes!! Unfortunately their error cost the tax payers lots of money.


Hm.  Well, never know when opportunity knocks   $46,000 for 3 days in jail.  I have never been in jail, or even seen a jail, but I think would take that deal :)


When he accepted to speak with the police without a lawyer is what got him.  Even if you are innocent, you have NO REASON to speak to the police.  Nothing you say will convince an officer hell bent on a conviction to change his mind.

@• 7 minutes ago • 4 years ago No, I was old enough legally to do the job. I chose to do the job of my own volition in exchange for the wage they promised me. I didn't need to work because my parents provided for me the things that I needed so I wasn't coerced or manipulated in anyway and I could quit at my leisure. Didn't feel like child labour to me. Hell, I was one of the few kids who had extra disposable income after they spent their allowance.

@Jo Salals Well you clearly disagree with what I said but offer no alternative. At least Jan had the stones to provide an argument. I'm fine being the joke because I've just found my punchline!

@Jan ok jan, I guess you neglected to look at how many people we take in. It's more than anyone, it's ridiculous. There are so many differences between Germany and Canada it's amusing that you'd even begin to compare. They aren't the same because they have socialized medicine. It's simple math, there isn't an infinite supply of medicine or medical care and we have trouble getting full coverage to citizens who have already been here for decades paying for it. More people who, out of the gate, claim they want to benefit from it who have yet to pay for it... is a strain. Sure might not collapse overnight but have some foresight... The demand line is rocketing and the supply line stays flat.

Credentials are the bottom line, I don't care how many minorites are in a PHD class if none of them ever publish anything that's cited or used by anyone else. But by all means continue to wave paper credentials around like they mean something.

We don't need high population because it's only a good thing if you can sustain it.

Who cares what age he is. He was old enough to post the comment but not old enough to hear criticism? I didn't know what age he was when I replied so I didn't choose him because he was a kid and I'm not going to disrespect him with velvet gloves so take your white knight routine to someone who cares and to someone who it's applicable to.

Well I know the man I am, I know my behaviour is sustainable and I don't rely on anyone but myself. I will never destroy my country and even if it is destroyed I'll still be okay because I'll have what it takes to stay and rebuild. I doubt the people here for health care will be there with me to rebuild but I know they'll be back once it's finished...

@Alex Martin problem is you don't know you're bill of rights or the common law that it protects

@Ragnarok are you serious? you must have no idea about Economics and Social Systems if you think that people coming into your country will collapse your health care system. I’m from Germany and people come here for these benefits as well. It’s what countries want, because we need talented and hard working people from all around the world. My girlfriend is from Russia and she benefits already a lot right now from our affordable and good health care but my country will benefit a lot more from here in the long run (she’s a Physician and soon to be PhD). And if you say that’s different because she is qualified, trust me there are still stupid people who want her out of the country.

If you ever visited a university‘s master Programm you’ll see how many immigrants are sitting in there, because almost no country can meet the demand of smart people by themselves.

Please think about what you’re saying next time, when you’re telling this crap to a young kid who’s dreaming of coming to your country, because people like you are actually ruining their own countries without even knowing it.

Except the fact if you don’t talk to them and go through a lawyer then you have to shovel out money for a lawyer. This guy was unemployed at the time right? So that right there is why he didn’t shut up and talk a lawyer. He thought he was obviously innocent and didn’t wanna spend thousands.

@SameerWahabShamim Chowdhury "Much cheaper healthcare" Factor in the lifetime of higher taxes and thats not really true.

@Dee Rick In their defense, the mind convinces itself of things. It's awful, but they believe in their abilities and won't be convinced otherwise, especially when it's in their best interest to bust as many criminals as possible. Ill-conceived goals that ruin lives. Promotions and pay raises should be contingent upon individual cases. Maybe they managed to trip up a suspect into giving information that seals the prosecution's case. That's better than "Mike got 53 baddies and Joe got 64. Joe, congratulations"

@SameerWahabShamim Chowdhury I had a job that was being taxed at age 12 which was going towards the health care system. Your age is irrelevant, it is inconsiderate and abusive to want to use something you (or your parents) haven't provided for.<br>Your country doesn't owe me shit why does mine owe you?

@SameerWahabShamim Chowdhury I had a job that was being taxed at age 12 which was going towards the health care system. Your age is irrelevant, it is inconsiderate and abusive to want to use something you (or your parents) haven't provided for.
Your country doesn't owe me shit why does mine owe you?

@Ragnarok Ahhh yes, because I a 13 year old child want to go to Canada for free health care is so incosiderate and abusive to it's social system, how nice.

@SameerWahabShamim Chowdhury Cool one more person who hasn't paid a fucking cent into our healthcare coming here to use it. Don't worry I'm sure this is sustainable for us, and isn't deeply inconsiderate to abuse another countries social systems in this way.

I've watched enough of these interrogations to know that if you are ever in a room with the police you keep your mouth shut especially if your innocent.  Some of these cops are like Hollywood writers and will use your own words to craft a story that fits their narrative.

They will continue to grill you for hours before the lawyer shows up though.

@MCP/ChronicBuzz You do understand that this man was set free because of a cop doing exactly that dont you?

If you think problems are equally large in canada, you are not looking.

@Alex Martin Doesnt matter. You tell the cop to get "A" lawyer. Not YOUR lawyer.

Its either that or maybe that police should try to solve crimes instead of just pinning them on random people so they can go home and tell everybody how well their're doing their jobs...<br>And let me tell ya; from what I'm seeing you have just as much a problem with your police as you're having with crime over there in the US^^

Its either that or maybe that police should try to solve crimes instead of just pinning them on random people so they can go home and tell everybody how well their're doing their jobs...
And let me tell ya; from what I'm seeing you have just as much a problem with your police as you're having with crime over there in the US^^

This and much cheaper health care is why I want to move to Canada.

@Alex Martin This is not true in Canada. In Canada there are no public defenders. If you have no money, you get legal aid and that pays for your lawyer. It will not buy you the best in their field, however that lawyer has everything to gain from representing you as best he/she can, as the only way to climb the ladder (and ask for higher tariffs) is to be successful.  Because of this, it is a better system than in the US.

A lot of people seem to base their views on how it is in the US, but outside the US things can be different you know...

@Alex Martin lawyer or not, don't talk to the police. They can and will use anything you say against you.

The problem is a lot of people can’t afford a lawyer. They have to rely on an overworked public defender who’s main job is to keep this wheel turning. Not to protect innocent defendants. Although some really are good people who do try to help.


How is it possible that an investigator and interrogator can indict you with false evidence?  And on top of that get a promotion because of that?  UNFUCKINGBELIABLE!


Suspended and demoted.....but still cops. Do you see the problem here?


Ive checked the footage you are guilty…. $46,000 can richer the ACCUSED lol


Attempting to coerce a false confession should be a felony crime.

@Malachi 6 The approach is fine. The problem is the choice of suspect. Dixon should never have been in that chair, so when we have that knowledge in advance, any tactics used against him are going to come across as inappropriate. In an ordinary situation, where someone is detained with probable cause, deceptive tactics are absolutely fair game.

@Max Lennon the question is do you support the approach this investigator used on this man or do you think he should have done better

Honestly I believe this guy way more than the other guy he was so calm and confident he was innocent. Even started to question the cops lack in investigating skills. Also called his bluff on the video information. Or….. a criminal mastermind😂

@Malachi 6 And maybe you should have asked a question instead of making an assumption.

@Max Lennon maybe you should have just said yes or no and be done with it

@Unionknight ahh yes that is messed up. But going in to an interrogation it seems like it would be most effective (generally) to act as though you know the subject is guilty… if it’s an innocent person I doubt they’d give in to stress and falsely confess to something  if the interrogator was just asking questions framed in a way that insinuated guiltiness. If they went in to an interrogation acting like the person is innocent on the other hand and they are just asking questions to probe then the people will typically be more defensive and won’t give info/ confess even if they were guilty  ( there is of course outliers here). What you are describing sounds like a form of psychological torture.

@Malachi 6 So you make random unsubstantiated claims online?

@Max Lennon so you support the behaviour of this investigator

@Visible Human There's a practice where for 8 hours + where the interrogator constantly interrupts them telling them they did the crime and they're going to jail until the person admits they did the crime even if they're innocent they don't want to experience that any longer

Good luck proving someone legitimately believed the person was innocent. What a stupid comment.

@ChrissyPlus only one way to interact with police , say NOTHING. exactly NOTHING , and only NOTHING.

Just the cop’s accent screams <i>c-word.</i>

It's legal in the US even to do that and arrest a minor

Άγγελος Μορίκης

Do you think people who comment on these videos think the criminals can see their comments? This is common, general-purpose, kindergarten-level advice for everyone when interacting with the police. Cheers!

@Zander Quinn Maybe. I'm not a lawyer. But that's not relevant to this discussion.

It's not because, and I can't remember the case law, law enforcement can actually "lie" to get you to say anything, except under oath in a courtroom.

@ChrissyPlus yes because 99% of the people in these videos are innocent.<br>Please, grow up.

@ChrissyPlus yes because 99% of the people in these videos are innocent.
Please, grow up.

Watch JCS' other videos. They all use the same practice on people who actually did it.

@Andrew Camden LOL My wife solved every mystery around our house by applying this exact tactic on all our three children. She tweaked her method just enough to keep it working through their teen years too. Magic!...<br>I guess my point is that fake it till you make it is an important tool when you're trying to get criminals to confess.

@Andrew Camden LOL My wife solved every mystery around our house by applying this exact tactic on all our three children. She tweaked her method just enough to keep it working through their teen years too. Magic!...
I guess my point is that fake it till you make it is an important tool when you're trying to get criminals to confess.

@Claudia Bothner they have quotas to meet. Metrics to hit. <br>It’s well known some detectives will do anything to close out a case including putting innocent people away for crimes they are not at all guilty of.

@Claudia Bothner they have quotas to meet. Metrics to hit.
It’s well known some detectives will do anything to close out a case including putting innocent people away for crimes they are not at all guilty of.

@Andrew Camden Yes, I thought he did the accusation misconceiving, in good faith. You lot seem to think/know he did false accusation knowingly. Can they do that just to get a suspect convicted, not caring for justice and truth? Do they get  praise for convicting, not for truth/justice done?

@Andrew Camden that’s part of the interrogation process lol. If the dude said we have video evidence a guilty person may confess to it. Why the hell would an innocent person confess when they knew they didn’t do it and the cops had video evidence of them not doing it?

@Max Lennon if the officer lied or pretended to know things he didn't, as in this case, the criminal intent is clear. Any officer who lies during the course of an attempt to coerce a confession can be assumed to be acting with criminal malice.

It'd be almost impossible to prove. You'd have to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer in question did not believe the victim was guilty. Good luck making that charge stick. :/

Lol as if. How would our rulers get their promotions?


Officer, if you have me on video tape, then you'll have to show that evidence in court. When you can not do so, I will use the law like a hammer, and the courts live an anvil, to beat the  financial resources and spirit out of you. Lock me up, and let's make it happen, friend. ;-)


anyone else tired of wicked cops who dont care about anyone but themselves and their gang?


I myself was atrested for Failure to appear. Never had a court date. Had to pay $300 to a bondsman. The charges were dropped as soon as i went in court. Was told i couldnt get my money back because i paid a bondsman 300 and not the whole 3000.then was advised i could sue but would pay more money then i would recive back. It is nightmare to be arrested for nothing and robbed of my money.

And was never given an explanation by the way as to why that happened.


Imagine being so bad at your job, that you would rather wrongfully imprison someone than actually investigate a crime. 🙄

Imagine being so bad at your job, that you would rather wrongfully imprison someone than actually investigate a crime. 🙄

@Feroplays46 you must never have lived in a third world country

@Feroplays46 you must never have lived in a third world country

its way more complicated than that and you know it

its way more complicated than that and you know it

Welcome to Japan! Its dishonourable to be wrong when accusing someone so the imprisonment rate of arrested criminals is around 98%. Rarely if ever do you get out if arrested, especially if foreign, they are known to be bery unforgiving twoards foreigners that are accused of any crime

That isn't a reasonable position, considering it is a hard job and humans are prone to mistakes considering they aren't omnipotent, all knowing, gods. All being said, I still get it, it's easy to get mad at the investigators.

@Stefan Vegsund It most certainly does happen in other countries, but America is almost singular in how much information the news media has access to; America is also relatively transparent compared to many other countries, so when shit like this happens it almost always gets reported on. Canada is similar, likely due to proximity influence from America and free flow of people and culture/information across the border. <br>While it's not seen as much in 1st world western countries, in many countries police and governmental corruption have landed a literally uncountable number of innocent people in prison or worse.

@Stefan Vegsund It most certainly does happen in other countries, but America is almost singular in how much information the news media has access to; America is also relatively transparent compared to many other countries, so when shit like this happens it almost always gets reported on. Canada is similar, likely due to proximity influence from America and free flow of people and culture/information across the border.
While it's not seen as much in 1st world western countries, in many countries police and governmental corruption have landed a literally uncountable number of innocent people in prison or worse.

@Tomáš Trmata can confirm. I'm an American expat currently living in Germany, I've traveled a lot in Western and Eastern Europe except in the UK, and the difference between police (and the justice system) in North America versus Europe is like night and day. Wrongful imprisonment is par for the course in the USA, but very rare in any corner of Europe.

And it makes sense, because in Europe, prisoners don't do hard labor. But in the USA, prison slavery is explicitly legal. When politicians whine about how expensive prisons are, it's all a farce: prisoners are a lucrative form of manual labor in the States, and are even used in call centers or as farm hands. This is why in the USA, they prefer having innocent people or harmless criminals in jail rather than violent ones, because it's easier to enslave and exploit a non-violent person. There are over two million people sitting in prisons across US territories, and I dare say that a sizable amount of them don't belong there. It's conspicuous that the prison population is so colossal, while criminals run rampant outside of prisons. Most rapists don't go to jail, and most murders aren't solved. So who the fuck are the +2 million peeps sitting in jail?!

@Feroplays46 oh really? You have knowledge of police practices of all other countries?

@Feroplays46 oh really? You have knowledge of police practices of all other countries?

At least it ended well alot of cases dont...I'm glad he got that fat 47k check

At least it ended well alot of cases dont...I'm glad he got that fat 47k check

@Feroplays46 In Amsterdam cops often simply refuse to come show up at a crime scene (or an accident) or when a perpetrator of a known crime is located! Though in all honesty it also is often dispatch refusing to send them.

@Chest Rockwell ? Canada is definitely not part of the UK. We have the queen on our money and other vestiges from that dominion but that doesn't meant we aren't fully autonomous and independent from the UK. <br>Source: Someone who lives in Canada.

@Chest Rockwell ? Canada is definitely not part of the UK. We have the queen on our money and other vestiges from that dominion but that doesn't meant we aren't fully autonomous and independent from the UK.
Source: Someone who lives in Canada.

To be honest, this is how all western juridical systems are built.(maybe all...?!)
It's not about finding the right person(though, which they often do), but more about "clearing cases".
There is a really easy explaination to this:
We as society expect to see crimes cleared.. that is why there are statistics for that.

If you all are not familiar with it "Paradise lost"(HBO I think series), an incredibly twisted and sad turn of events:
That not only took the lives of three small boys(like 8 years old) , but also wrongfully imprisoned 3 other young men.
If you look at it, it becomes very clear:
Society wants someone to pay.(And if you watch the documentary you will know exactly what I mean, it's very outspoken in the documentary, but the same thesis applies everytime something unjust have occured)

It does'nt really matter who it is that pays, just that someone does.
It's much easier for law enforcement to single in on someone "who could have done it", present him/her.
And let society quenche its thirst for justice(..or blood for that matter)
Because when we are at ease with the fact that justice have been served.. then we have another notch to add to the collection of "crimes solved" to show when we need to present solving rates again.

Everyone is happy.

@Amy...or be so arrogant that they refused to admit...they're wrong. 😤

@Amy...or be so arrogant that they refused to admit...they're wrong. 😤

@Feroplays46 I can just feel your arrogance

@Feroplays46 I can just feel your arrogance

@Stefan Vegsund
Bad people are attracted to jobs that has authority and forceful exploitation.

Seeing how the norwegian cops is differentiating in upholding the criminalisation of drugs by going more after minorities and drug addicts in eastern Oslo, worsening their situation with bills and drug contracts, it's clear there is not a secular mindset in the force.

Where the police, however, is not differentiating is about the circumstances in relation to drug consumption: there is several cases of rape victims getting charged and contracted for drug use that they themselves wasn't responsible for, (even people that only seek help through calling health services) and imagine then how humiliating and unnecessary that check up the genitals are for the victims in these cases. With a bill on top of that and a drug contract, it's shit for those that struggles most in our society because the police feel they have had a good job done on their part.

Though objectively milder and more humane than other police forces around the world, it doesn't exclude the Norwegian police force from being shit and ignorant towards people in certain areas, especially in drug related cases.

(no, not ALL cops are bad of course, but the bad personalities that are attracted to the force are the ones being dominant there, trying to justify the means behind their oppressive behaviour in a manipulative and ideological manner, while the few "good ones" have too little influence to make a difference. Some individuals in the norwegian police force have spoken out in defence of the recent drug reform law being suggested, though, so kudos to them for being insightful about ethics)

@Finn S.  Higher educations isnt a guarantee preventing bad jugdement at an individual level, or in every case. But on  group level, education and experience within the right framework will increase the possibillity of making well thought out decisions.  Of course, morality, culture, politics etc within the country will be decisive for how the systems work. Also the direction of the education.

Anyways, from what i understand.. police in US or  America  at large ,get way too less time to practice these important situations.

Even the mass murderer at utoya, in Norway, got ten times as fair treatment than these people.

@Nathan H One has to seek them out from various institutions and lawyers do post case findings to advertise for themselves. Most of these errors are well buried from the public. Norway has done plenty, and has been critizised for structutal errors. European courts has found structral breeches of human rights even.

@Daniel H It is many places. It still happens, sadly.

@Daniel H It is many places. It still happens, sadly.

@Steffen False. Higher education does not compensate well for incompetence. And this happened in Canada, which has similar educations and systems for police as European nations.

@Fael Reklaw Most of my countrymen are. There are plenty of examples of misconduct in Norway. Plenty.

@Fael Reklaw Most of my countrymen are. There are plenty of examples of misconduct in Norway. Plenty.

@Stefan Vegsund You haven't done your research then. There have been plenty of wrong imprisonments in both prisons and psychiatric institutions. And one of the main faults is structural. Judicials do this to several individuals every single year.

Several was found innocent after being punished. Some of these cases were obviously fraudulent. And Norway rarely care about paying any reparation for such misconduct. Any incompetence goes unpunished.

@Tomáš Trmata Higher education doesn't stop incompentence. Police has at least a bachelor degree in my country, yet there's plenty of incompetence. The difference is, sadly, a larger inertia for accepting this. After all, 'educated people cannot be incompetent' is a dangerous mantra to have.

Police, judicial systems, and psychiatry are all ripe with incompetent people.

Police, judicial systems, and psychiatry are all ripe with incompetent people.

@ITILII I see no problem with an investigator lying to get things moving faster, the problem is when they fail to do their job by ignoring the evidence

@Max Not norway. Both our investigators and prison system are at such high level, we travel around the world to teach others. But what to expect from people having 6 months at a police academy like in US and other countries, working in a system where its all about money, sending people to private prisons which earns big bucks of others misery.   They´re not unconditionally looking for truth, but by all means a way to place blame.

@pandoman lol work on your accents man :P

@pandoman lol work on your accents man :P

@Stefan Vegsund Yeah sadly the issue is the police care about their image to the public more than seeking justice because the good image gives them a pay bump.

@Stefan Vegsund Maybe because you guys in Scandinavia are really naive.

@Stefan Vegsund Maybe because you guys in Scandinavia are really naive.

One time my grandfather was accused of murder when he was young, but... he had been with family in an entirely different state at the time of the crime! Nowhere near the victim, my aunts who he was visiting had to come to the courthouse from all that way away to vouch for him and help him go free. Sometimes, they make mistakes

@Feroplays46 I live in New Zealand and it's very much a phenomenon here too.

@Feroplays46 I live in New Zealand and it's very much a phenomenon here too.

@Max so true i had to experience the same already in germany

@Max so true i had to experience the same already in germany

This is the majority of investigations , look for a book by a law professer called you have the right to remain innocent

This is the majority of investigations , look for a book by a law professer called you have the right to remain innocent

@Stefan Vegsund srsly? Norwegian police is infamous for being very eager to accuse parents of child abuse.

@Stefan Vegsund srsly? Norwegian police is infamous for being very eager to accuse parents of child abuse.

@Angus Black nope Canada is still part of The uk The queen is on The money

@Angus Black nope Canada is still part of The uk The queen is on The money

I agree, Michael said he was on the bus and it has cameras. Investigator should have gone there right then.

I agree, Michael said he was on the bus and it has cameras. Investigator should have gone there right then.

The interrogator was trying to get a quick promotion, boy did that backfire lol.

The interrogator was trying to get a quick promotion, boy did that backfire lol.

@Stefan Vegsund Just because you never hear of them doesnt mean it does not happen.

@Stefan Vegsund Just because you never hear of them doesnt mean it does not happen.

@Dankest Ranch yup and so did Trump but he did it as a private citizen. So did Biden, all politicians are crap on both sides.

they all lie(they're trained, coached, encouraged to lie); and go for the quickest confession(even if coerced~!)

they all lie(they're trained, coached, encouraged to lie); and go for the quickest confession(even if coerced~!)

It’s difficult but focusing solely on the investigators mistakes is unfair, yes some professions require a lot more diligence and most of those professionals take it to heart including most of the officers in the video, still not a place for people who’s greatest fuck up could be an unevenly attached coffee cup lid or shorting change then you don’t have the expertise.

Imagine being the prick that sees this happen a thousand times and lets his officers get away with it.

Imagine being the prick that sees this happen a thousand times and lets his officers get away with it.

its more that he'd rather imprison the wrong person than admit he was wrong. I reckon 95% of people on earth have a problem admitting they're wrong. It takes great character to admit being wrong, but it also allows you to grow as a person.

@Feroplays46 "Dictapasteries and Desocrates?" haha, Not to mention you're getting all riled up when someone forces you to be more specific? Then you get all riled up because other people are not being specific? You're quite the character lmao

It's easier, and it leads to promotions. It should be criminal to try to get a confession in bad faith.

It's easier, and it leads to promotions. It should be criminal to try to get a confession in bad faith.

@Josh hahaha bro what are you Even talking about? Dictatories arent even worth to mention because duuuuuh?! We are Talking about the democraties of the Western world gosh you americans cant even think in context

@Feroplays46 you need to get out more if you actually believe that lol. I'm sure the police in dictatorships around the world are super honest lol. that profession doesn't attract honest people. doesn't matter the country

Don't put all the blame on the officers, the system trains them that making their quotas is more important than upholding the law, the way it should be. That's not to say the officers are not assholes, they obviously had a choice.

In some countries that's rule instead of exception

In some countries that's rule instead of exception

@DT only see doesnt mean only happens are you dense?

@DT only see doesnt mean only happens are you dense?

@Feroplays46 then say that 😂😂 because you literally did say it’s a “phenomena you only see in North American countries”

@Feroplays46 then say that 😂😂 because you literally did say it’s a “phenomena you only see in North American countries”

@DT i didnt say it dont happen anywhere else what i meant was i only see that to this degree in north america? Especially the us where 5% of all death penalties are wrong?

@Feroplays46 rrrrriiiiight wrongful indictment only happens in the USA and Canada...

@Feroplays46 rrrrriiiiight wrongful indictment only happens in the USA and Canada...

I think Eazy E just revealed that he's a prosecuter somewhere.  He ignores alll the evidence that's right in front of his face.

Exactly whats going on. And they never caught the perp lol

Exactly whats going on. And they never caught the perp lol

Kamala Harris did that as a prosecutor too

Kamala Harris did that as a prosecutor too

Police are human and make mistakes just like everyone else, but at the same time, their mistakes have serious long lasting consequences in others life’s.

@pandoman Canada is no longer part of the UK.
Canada became a self-governing dominion within the British empire on 1 July 1867 when the British North America Act was passed by the UK Parliament.
Canada obtained full autonomy when the UK Parliament passed the Canada Act 1982.

I guess you guys tqlk about 1st world countries :) the set forth happens in 3rd world countries all the time

I guess you guys tqlk about 1st world countries :) the set forth happens in 3rd world countries all the time

The term Northern America refers to the northernmost countries and territories of North America: the United States, Bermuda, St. Pierre and Miquelon, Canada, and Greenland.

Interviewer: So why did you falsely accuse him of aggravated assault?

Some police officer: Money

Interviewer: So why did you falsely accuse him of aggravated assault?

Some police officer: *Money*

@Max Nope, in my country are competent and it takes a lot to become a cop, maybe that is why.

@Max Nope, in my country are competent and it takes a lot to become a cop, maybe that is why.

the interviewer came from Romford......I'd like to see the analysis of the guys recruitment interview.....that will be a revealing onion

@Max not really in uk anymore after big cases like Guildford four etc

@Max not really in uk anymore after big cases like Guildford four etc

So much more than simply being bad at your job; it's deliberately LYING to get another person into prison. No one should be above the law, or below the law - the law either applies to EVERYBODY....or it applies to NOBODY !!!

Yes, this definetly happens in North America all the time, but almost never in other countries. I live in norway, and i have only heard of 1 single wrong imprisonment over the last 20 year's.

This is a strange phenomenon that i actually only see in north american countries

This is a strange phenomenon that i actually only see in north american countries

Welcome to the world of the police in pretty much any country.

Welcome to the world of the police in pretty much any country.


Always ask for a lawyer. Specially if you are innocent.


Title of the vid is the mefjn TRUTH! I am fighting 2 seperate charges that are flat out not right. The first one the cop lied about a turn signal.  System is disgusting.


The Black Suspect got a $46K payday!!  How can I get wrongfully imprisoned ?!?


Pro tip, if a cop ever says “the evidence against you is overwhelming” then simply say “I’d like an attorney”

@Kubomi And can you sue again to pay for the Lawyer you will need to win the lawsuit?

@RRW If you are innocent you can always sue the state or accuser to pay the fees.

Yes that’s true. Also can’t you ask to see the evidence?

@Hoperandi skräpkonto In the U.S., just saying "Lawyer." isn't enough. The request for counsel must be “clear and unequivocal”.

@Red Purps they actually would be for my family and many families, while prison means no devastating debt that could possibly last years lol

@lonecourierjoeyV2 me too and any other evidence that he has of course I'd wait for my attorney to get there first Michael could've walked out that night if he only would've demanded the evidence the dumb cop said he had. Sad

@RRW right, and the criminal courts are a conveyor belt and you have to fight <del>Pay$$</del> to get off it

@RRW right, and the criminal courts are a conveyor belt and you have to fight -Pay$$- to get off it

@lonecourierjoeyV2 I was actually screaming that at my phone while I was watching it. 🤣

I would ask to see the visual evidence (such as the video) to see if im visible in it

@BruceNJeffAreMyFlies you're right. It's sad that it took another investigator to step in three days later to take a look at the "evidence".  Then after that they only got suspended and demoted. what the hell? I know they're not all bad but they do try and bulldoze over us if you don't know the extent of your rights. the justice system needs some repairs because it's seriously out of order.

@locabynature That's exactly it. You assume that because police officers are just people, members of society, they must want justice and whats right to prevail. <br>Unfortunately, even if they do, it's not worth their time or effort to find the truth in a lot of cases. They'd rather just slap some cuffs on and get back to the office in time for lunch after all the other bullshit they've had to deal with their whole career..

@locabynature That's exactly it. You assume that because police officers are just people, members of society, they must want justice and whats right to prevail.
Unfortunately, even if they do, it's not worth their time or effort to find the truth in a lot of cases. They'd rather just slap some cuffs on and get back to the office in time for lunch after all the other bullshit they've had to deal with their whole career..

Say, very clearly, "I want an attorney." Nothing more, nothing less. Look at the YouTube video called Do Not Talk to the Police, and the book called You Have the Right to Remain Innocent.

I think most people are thinking they can talk their way out of it. I don't blame them but it really screws them in the end.

@Red Purps If you can't pay, you don't get an attorney.

@Red Purps In some cases? It can mean the death of you or a loved one, especially in America

@Red Purps As I said, a lot of people have more faith in the justice system than they should especially when they know they are innocent.

@notahotshot People who say that forget about the financial aspect. Even though a lot of countries give people the right to an attorney they may still charge for them. If someone is in a precarious financial situation and are a bit naive they may have more faith in  the justice system finding them innocent rather than spending a bunch of money in legal fees.

@Rej3ct _Conquer Do you really think they will say in court, "Your honor, the accused asked for an attorney. Obviously he is guilty."

@Rej3ct _Conquer Better to appear guilty than to risk being found guilty. The police aren't on the side of the suspect, so innocent suspects should focus entirely on their own well-being.

It's best to ask for an attorney as soon as they start asking questions.


Michael needed more than that. He needs a medal and three times that amount.


Its anyone in law enforcement like them makes people not trust any of them!!!!


Clerk: "I was robbed by a short white man"
Police: "Alright boys, look for the biggest black guy you can find!"

In the shadow of the USA's issues, we Canadians often forget we have serious racial profiling problems of our own. Videos like this remind me just how much work we still need to do.


@Jackson C But you could, because reason. xD

@Kohlenstoffisotop12 no no I really cant

@Kohlenstoffisotop12 I cant tell if that's a question or not, but yes, what's weird is he makes Computer Science themed videos. The YouTube algorithm works in mysterious ways

Lol, it so funny I love this chanal so it's funny that you do to. I watch all of your coding vids.

Jabrils!!! What's good my guy?? Another one of my favs!


This cop obviously doesn’t know the meaning of the word ‘paramount’.


if only i was mr beast, Id give justin a million dollars


"Getting a confession void of evidence is in fact excellent for an investigator's career"

That's so fucked up. Something is seriously wrong with a system in which people are actively rewarded for punishing the innocent.


The first case pissed me off right away when the Detective just asks why did you do it, not where were you, what were you doing. Not letting him build any Alibi whatsoever to test for any forms of lying or uncertainty about his story.

Legitimately dog shit investigative work, even if he was guilty. Like you can't possibly learn anything like that...

Especially when the description didn't match and they had no physical evidence. The man accused he called their bluff and the cop just realized he had the power to do whatever he damn well pleased and arrested the guy.

Its cause they have zero proof it was him.  He was just a black man, that cops saw near a crime. Cops dont care about getting the right guy, just getting someone to blame. Sadly, seems like the first guy has dealt with this shit a few times.

@Mitsaras Pop happens more than we think, but to some of us more than others.

It's called positive confrontation.
They put you in a room, in a corner, surrounded on all sides making you nervous as all hell. One way window on your right, officer to your left and your back literally to a wall.
The Officer will initially play nice ("You can leave this room at any time, just say and my colleagues will escort you out. Now, would you like something to drink? Coffee perhaps?") then after getting a rapport and a baseline (what the subject looks like when they aren't lying to you) flip into gently asking "Why did you do it?". The initial, unguarded response and how it deviates from the baseline might raise or lower the suspicions of the officer in front of you.

It's a very common form of interrogation also known as "the interrogator's right to fucking lie to you" where they can straight up lie in pursuit of "truth".

If they fool the guilty into believing they were caught red handed they can convince them that cooperation is the most profitable option for them.

Now, every person under the sun can see the problem, under this kind of pressure even the innocent may plead guilty in fear of the worst to come.

It's a very common form of interrogation also known as _"the interrogator's right to fucking _*_lie_*_ to you"_ where they can straight up lie in pursuit of _"truth"._

If they fool the guilty into believing they were caught red handed they can convince them that cooperation is the most profitable option for them.

Now, every person under the sun can see the problem, under this kind of pressure even the innocent may plead guilty in fear of the worst to come.

@sam For too many police officers and prosecutors facts don't matter.

Its a form of reverse psychology to get the subject to feel guilt. Its a common form of interrogation

I think the attempt there was to get a straightforward emotional reaction out of a nervous guy either wondering why he was in that room or knowing exactly why he was in that room. Pissing a person off out of the gate occasionally elicits an unsolicited truth. Either way getting more than a vaguely circumstantial reference shouldn't be the goal; fact based evidence and verifiable witness testimony should be pertinent.

Oh wow<br>I think you handle it like a real professional

Oh wow
I think you handle it like a real professional


Military in a nutshell. Guilty until proven innocent


Detectives should have a 1 strike your out policy


That investigator is a clown. He should pay for putting him in jail. He obviously did no research.


Demoted and suspended.. good suites them right.. for not doing the ONE JOB THEY HAD as an investigater... you know like  INVESTIGATE


I am Canadian/Ontarian, that "investigator" was a f*<b>***</b> disgrace. Being kept in jail for three and a half days for a person accused of a non-violent crime without evidence is utterly disgraceful.

I am Canadian/Ontarian, that "investigator" was a f****** disgrace. Being kept in jail for three and a half days for a person accused of a non-violent crime without evidence is utterly disgraceful.

@fireflocs I am more upset that the bearded guy was in handcuffed while being interviewed.

I'm more upset about the guy who got falsely jailed for years, personally.

@Seven Sages My contention is with the unnecessary use of confinement and shackles for someone who was presumed guilty because the police needed to bring somebody in. If that were me, I would resist arrest and imprisonment.

Pretty shocking, yup. He had a really petty and obnoxious approach and if someone like that was ever trying to interview me I would point out their bad attitude tell them I would not be saying anything to them. Get me another interviewer and I will happily speak to them. Same in any walk of life, if you come up against someone like that, just criticise them to their face and tell them you want to deal with someone else.


Everyone saying get a lawyer...... cant trust them either. They can feed prosecution plea deals by taking advantage of your ignorance of the law. Public pretender did that to me. Cared not one lick of what i had to say which wouldve dropped my charge down and convinced me a plea was my best option.


I'm never confident in the honesty of anyone named "candy"


Him calling out the interrogator's bluff is the best part

Imagine being one of two people in a room and smelling something fetid, then having the other inhabitant tell you that you farted.

Honestly the best part for me was knowing the detective was suspended and demoted for how terribly he handled this investigation.

"The truth is paramount." The cop says after lying through his teeth for over an hour. ACAB

@JealousElephant I get the feeling of vindictiveness in that he decided not to corroborate the story. Instead, allowing the guy to rot in a cell for 3 days.

The interrogator's demeanor changed almost immediately after that discussion. His level of confrontation all but evaporated and his confidence took a nosedive.

So beautiful. I mean it was obvious to him that he was bluffing but him calling it out like that is so satisfying.


Nice that they were demoted and suspended without pay. Nicest guy in the world and didn't match the description at all, and was held for 4 days? bs


Where’s the other videos dude!?!? I watch them every night

"That's a wrap, folks. The flagged videos violate the "violence" and "sensitive events" guidelines. The same old tune we've been hearing since 2018. It's their gig so fair enough. We cannot thank you enough for the love you have shown this channel, and we will of course keep you updated on our next move. Love goes out to you all x" thats what he said


I hope the guy who got put in prison sued the police into oblivion


Never talk to the police without a lawyer, they are not your friends.

@Death Row Executions Are you aware of The Barbara Graham Case in which Barbara refused immunity? John True, who took immunity, the chief prosecution witness, made a statement he met her first on March 9th 1953, the date of the murder, and then testified he met her on March 8th - the date of the conspiracy he was at with two others ( Santo and Perkins ) who were convicted of the murder and executed with her and he walked free. The statement True made saying he first met her on March 9th was not produced at the trial. It surfaced in 1960. Nothing has been done.There are other issues such as the chief prosecutor claimed she confessed to pistolwhipping the victim until dead and the chief prosecutor's own witness,The Autopsy Surgeon, called to establish the cause of death said the cause of death was strangulation.True also testified Barbara put a pillowcase over the victim's head but in the statement not produced at the trial he said Perkins - not Barbara Graham - put the pillowcase over the victim's head. Perkins confessed to Edward S. Montgomery, Pullitzer Prize-winning journalist two weeks before he was executed " Montgomery, that ol' lady was never pistolwhipped. She was beat with her own cane. " If you want to read of this shocking miscarriage of justice it is outlined in Kathleen A. Cairns' book Proof of Guilt: Barbara Graham and the Politics of Executing Women in America University of Nebraska Press.True's allegation she was at the conspiracy on March 8th is disproved by this statement of True's and her innocence would have been proved as a fact in evidence before the crime, murder, if it had been produced at the trial. The prosecution had to prove she was at the conspiracy as it was necessary for the prosecution to prove guilt by proving Barbara had knowledge of the robbery and therefore mens rea - intention in advance to kill the victim if the victim was in her home when those who were the true conspirators including True burglarized it, in order to get the death penalty by proving they all had knowledge in advance of the robbery on March 8th. This element of intention of Barbara Graham, required to be proved by the prosecution, was erroneously " proved " by not producing the statement in which True said he first met Barbara Graham on March 9th (" I seen her, she was just a woman with Mr. Perkins " - the other conspirator with Santo and True - and Baxter Shorter - True said in the non-produced statement ), and without the statement in evidence, True's testimony erroneously" proved"  to The Jury she had knowledge of the robbery at the conspiracy and therefore was at the crime. If the statement had been produced at the trial, the fact before the crime would have been that she was not at the conspiracy on March 8th and therefore the evidence would have been that she was not at the crime as it proved she had no knowledge of it in advance, therefore no intention to commit First Degree Murder  - no mens rea - and as she did not have any knowledge at all she did not commit the murder. If the statement had been in evidence, the fact before the crime   would have proved was that True was framing her as being there on March 9th - the night of the murder ( and the prosecution was also ). As the statement was not produced, Barbara was executed in 1955 for First Degree Murder. True had testified Santo put a piece of cloth around the victim's neck. And the cause of death was strangulation as proved by the autopsy Surgeon.

I think the ones with no remorse who think they are smarter than everyone ( Narcissists... sociopaths), they will probably decline a lawyer because in actuality they dont know how dumb they sound and cant keep up with all of the manipulative lies.

If a LEO asks you "How are you doing?", your answer should be "I can neither confirm nor deny that."
If a LEO asks you "Is the sky blue?", your answer should be "I can neither confirm nor deny that."
If a LEO asks you "Does 2 plus 2 equal 4", your answer should be "I can neither confirm nor deny that."

Im relatively pro police, and i agree with that

@Jontae Grace I am 90% sure that they are required to give you a lawyer if you request one... A lot of people don't know this and that's what the problem is.

@A71 i dont think he would have stayed the night if he got to talk to his Attorney. Im only guessing cause the cop showed little to no care about what michael had to say; except if he was gonna spill the beans

Not everyone has a lawyer. Sometimes people feel like they can talk their way out of the problem. Especially when they are innocent.

MrAnders0n91 most likely but the lawyer is there to make sure he doesn’t incriminate himself

Genuine question. If Michael had a lawyer with him, would they have pushed the cops to investigate further, provide evidence etc? In short, would Michael have been locked up for 3 days if he had a lawyer present?

@vilkku No, do not say anything at all without a lawyer present. Everything you say can and will be used against you.

@vilkku "nah i only wanted a coke" <br>- Jeff

@vilkku "nah i only wanted a coke"
- Jeff


The guy being interrogated isnt always the criminal in the interrogation room.


5:20 I think we all know how the justice people treat black people in America, this is an everyday thing that you're accused of doing something you didn't do. it is not an anomaly at all