“That’s why we’re here. To investigate” no, you’re there to get a confession from him that would be false. You’ve already made up your mind that he is guilty. You’re not investigating, you don’t care.

@Karina Gonzalez closure and a closed case are a scary source of emotional and political power. Honestly, it's scary to be human.

@masterskellington92 i know what u meant. I worked retail too, I would see people stealing candy bars and cheap make up. I honestly did not care. Little things can't make a fuss over. Someone lying about a major crime and there's no proof is a lot different.  You can suspect someone is lying but u still need evidence.

@Wize Wolf it was an example of what people would lie about not the actual case. Just saying people suck :(

@NaySay Network serial killers? Hell isn't there a case where the dude tried to help find himself?

@Nick Ger I would love to but sadly I’m 1. Not Canadian 2. Not a politician. You’re allowed to point out issues in systems even if you yourself can’t fix them. If everyone started doing it, maybe one day it WOULD get fixed

Literally. The entire time I was thinking just do your damn job and investigate because he didn't match the description one bit and his composure never changed. It is really sad that these things still happen, I thought detectives and police officers would have been smarter by now. I mean seriously it's 2021.. what the fuck.

its insane because if you look at the other videos on his channel when u see the guilty cases they do so much more investigation to make sure that they are rightfully convicted but these cases are literally mind blowing on how little evidence there is and how they have already made up their mind. its insane.

NOT SUPPORTING THIS MANNER but, this lack of evidence while investigating made it so multiple crime bosses got away with crime even tho they know for certain they are guilty... everything is wromg

jфsернi кядкошsкi

@Captain Caveman Not all cops. Yes there are unofficial quotas. If a police department doesn’t make a certain amount of arrests, write a certain number of tickets, etc., their funding goes down. In my opinion, it’s fucking bullshit that these quotas even have to exist because they’re part of the problem.

@Gamer88 ''Based off of the info they currently have''??? Talking about this case specifically... The actual suspect was said to be a SMALL WHITE MAN. Michael who came in is 6'3 and NOT white...

@Jazzy Jerica He just wanted that promotion.

@Guts tell that to every cop in town who refuses to drop me for trespassing when I'm sleeping on properties in my car. Stop fucking making an entire nation an individual when we still argue of presidents.

I am NOT supporting this kind of thing. But there will always be individual intentions. As wrong or right it is. Though I do support finding justice. Unless we actually spend time there, we won't know the damage. Spend time in retail, people lie about coupons, I can't imagine the lies I would get about daily robberies. It's about 4-10 dudes to a city of 10k to idk LA. I'm not even god fearing and I must ask for tolerance.

@Gamer88 to be fair, they are threatening to take something invaluable off of innocent men and women. I’ll be more lenient when they figure out a way for them to get those years of free life back. These fuckups happen way too often and undermine what our justice system ought to be

@Guts To be fair, they have to react to situations in an instant. They can’t afford to hesitate for even a second. They also have to do their job based off of the info they currently have.

angrily pushing the like button of your comment kizzy

That has to be one of the most annoying things about this whole system. It’s great when they’re actually interrogating a guilty person, but they won’t even open up their minds to the possibility that they might have gotten something wrong. These are peoples lives we’re talking about and they just care about being right.


And this is pretty much what happens everyday in hawkesburry  ontario then when u raise ur voice they simply pull the I'm an officer bullshit


Wow held that man for 3 and a half days.


I get that ur breaking down this but why don’t people like u do this before an innocent guy served time so u can analyze it for the jury


These are not examples of a justice system. A justice system would care to find the truth, not playing tricks on suspects in order to get a false confession. The opportunity to have a lawyer present should be given before an interrogation is even conducted.


I really hope the innocent guy who got screwed by “CANDY” and spent two years in jail was reimbursed too. Grave injustice

I really hope the innocent guy who got screwed by “CANDY” and spent two years in jail was reimbursed too. Grave injustice

@Justin Madrid he served his time and from what I gather, rehabilitated himself. Obviously he shouldn’t have done this but he was in his early 20s, probably had bad education and peers, and depending on where he lives know this - there are A LOT of rural areas in America with no jobs around besides correction officers and farmers. I look at many counties in upstate NY near the Canadian border - the poverty line is near 50%, average cost of the homes is less than $60,000, and the jobs consist of gas station employees, correction officers, nurses at local hospital, teachers at the school, police officers or farmers. The only people who even make a comfortable living own business’ using the resources like lumber. A guy in his 20s in an area with no jobs - yea he fucked up, but he’ll be the first one to admit it.

@Justin Madrid <br>Saying that there is nothing to be done about prejudice is equivalent to justifying it. Did you consider that one cannot change aesthetic qualities that they are BORN with? False accusations don't just stick to people with criminal records - it carries over to both minorities and disabled individuals. In the face of those facts your "they deserve it" remark is rendered absolutely deranged.

@Justin Madrid
Saying that there is nothing to be done about prejudice is equivalent to justifying it. Did you consider that one cannot change aesthetic qualities that they are BORN with? False accusations don't just stick to people with criminal records - it carries over to both minorities and disabled individuals. In the face of those facts your "they deserve it" remark is rendered absolutely deranged.

@Justin Madrid he said it himself “I used to be a piece of shit and I told myself I’m not going back”<br>He also said “All I’ve done since I got out is work my ass off” he’s trying to better his life

@Justin Madrid he said it himself “I used to be a piece of shit and I told myself I’m not going back”
He also said “All I’ve done since I got out is work my ass off” he’s trying to better his life

@Rat With a lot of respect, especially since I worked in retail for years back in the day. I wonder, why are you implying/assuming that I mistreat retail employees? This can only mean you have completely missed my point.

Again, just because I suggest you don't do X in order to avoid being mistreated, DOES NOT MEAN I AGREE WITH THEM MISTREATING YOU FOR X.

For example, I have no problem if you go to court with your shirt untucked. I will not mistreat you at all for going to court with your shirt untucked. But I AM warning you that you WILL be mistreated by the judge and jury if you go to court with your shirt untucked.

@Justin Madrid how exactly do you treat Wal-Mart employees bruh

@Justin Madrid how exactly do you treat Wal-Mart employees bruh

the only justice would be if the DA that decided to raise charges and take the case to court is sent to 2 years of prison too.

he was kidnapped by the government, due to gross incompetence and lack of empathy from a few people. justice is only if the people who harmed him are punished.

@Justin Madrid Yes, everyone does have biases. No, not everyone let's those biases influence their decisions at work as a public servant.

If I go to a job interview, then I am placing myself before a body that I will be serving. In that matter, yes I am subservient to the culture of the employer. Again, the police serve me and the public at large. In that sense, they need to accept the reality that good, upstanding citizens in the millions have tattoos and piercings. Funnily enough, most employers have already accepted that fact.

Show me studies that prove a correlation between tattoos or hairstyles and crime rates. Tattoos are present on every continent and have a cultural basis as such. That dudes beard wasn't even unkempt, it was merely long. Do you assume all Amish men are criminals? Psychological studies have proven that false allegations are generally met with angry denial and defensive behavior.

As far as for your "100th time", you're probably gonna keep having to defend your position that police are justified in falsely incarceration an innocent man because he had "scary beard". It's a shitty position, and you're a shitty person for maintaining it.

@Justin Madrid I don't serve the police, they serve me. We live in a democratic republic and as such, the minority does not dictate to the majority. If you and the police have a problem with beards and emphatic self defense of one's true actions, then you have problems with the freedoms we are entitled to. If you and the police stereotype incorrectly that often, then you are woefully underskilled to be in the policing profession. I guess that's why they say hammers only see nails though, eh?

The entire job of the police is to protect, serve, and ascertain the truth of a criminal event so as to attain a lawful conviction.

@Justin Madrid That's just stupid. You can't justify taking 2 years of a mans life away just because he did something wrong in his past.

@Justin Madrid That's just stupid. You can't justify taking 2 years of a mans life away just because he did something wrong in his past.

@CrazyDragy If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck…..that may be what’s he’s saying.

@CrazyDragy If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck…..that may be what’s he’s saying.

@tehpownlawl you stereotype. you do it. you can deny it, but you literally do it yourself. what point are you trying to make?

@tehpownlawl you stereotype. you do it. you can deny it, but you literally do it yourself. what point are you trying to make?

@Justin Madrid What is defending stereotyping for 800 Alex

@Justin Madrid What is defending stereotyping for 800 Alex

@tehpownlawl lol you didnt read the full conversation.

@tehpownlawl lol you didnt read the full conversation.

@Justin Madrid What is stereotyping for 800 Alex

@Justin Madrid What is stereotyping for 800 Alex

@Justin Madrid wait do you think that a man having a beard and a leather jacket decreases the survival of the species?

@Justin Madrid wait do you think that a man having a beard and a leather jacket decreases the survival of the species?

@Krishiv Agarwal No, that is not the point lmao. If that were the case, child rapists would not be put on a list after they were released from prison. You also get longer jail sentences if you have a history of convictions as well.

@Justin Madrid the entire point of getting people out of jail is that they have been FORGIVEN for their crimes

@Justin Madrid the entire point of getting people out of jail is that they have been FORGIVEN for their crimes

@D D L That doesn't even make sense. What do you mean? I am not committing any errors.

@D D L That doesn't even make sense. What do you mean? I am not committing any errors.

@Justin Madrid  The  error in logic you commit IS projectig Your personal biases onto 'sociery as a whole".

@Justin Madrid  The  error in logic you commit IS projectig Your personal biases onto 'sociery as a whole".

And if you ARE that wolf trying to hide in sheep's  clothing, you're  not as invisible  as you think .

And if you ARE that wolf trying to hide in sheep's  clothing, you're  not as invisible  as you think .

@Mr Oooo Weee trying to justify INJUSTICE 😂

@Mr Oooo Weee trying to justify INJUSTICE 😂

@Justin Madrid This is not a life skills video so why are you preaching? Haven't you heard of "never judge a book by it's cover"?

@Justin Madrid This is not a life skills video so why are you preaching? Haven't you heard of "never judge a book by it's cover"?

@sora he's saying if he didn't have a criminal history with the exact same crime then this wouldn't have happened... Are you guys trying to defend people like me with a criminal history? Because no thank you, your passion/righteous indignation is tacky, kinda like how he started his comments with "oops". My actions will have lifelong consequences, because that's the burden of personal responsibility. What happened was wrong, but those people accused him, not the police. When you have a victim and a witness identifying you and creating a false narrative similar to past criminal history, then what, you would've done better than police? How arrogant, you guys do realize horrible things happen all the time, and you can blame every institution in the world, but the true problem is the individuals within that system that poison it. The British detective, and the female false accuser. And the issue in this system you guys call society and blame your problems on, is actually just you, the individuals. Stop blaming human nature on systems, it prevents solutions. And don't defend people like me with such vigor, it's patronizing and makes you look like a fool. That goes for all you righteous white knights insulting a random guy with a rational opinion- albeit a terrible delivery on his part, he isn't completely wrong, but he's less disrespectful than you are

@Mounir Saada It is mad isn't it? Self fulfilling prophecy in a nutshell.

@Mounir Saada It is mad isn't it? Self fulfilling prophecy in a nutshell.

@Justin Madrid It’s really funny seeing you try to save face. You know what you said and when people call you out on your shit you all the sudden try to deflect blame from yourself to “society”.

@Justin Madrid It’s really funny seeing you try to save face. You know what you said and when people call you out on your shit you all the sudden try to deflect blame from yourself to “society”.

@Justin Madrid My dad was falsely accused and did those exact things yet got four years in prison because he was a pastor and autistic, therefore they perceived him as different. He was polite, well kept, and had no past record yet they put him away with no evidence. I’m sorry but unless you’ve had experience with how corrupt the justice system is you won’t understand that it doesn’t matter who you are or how you present yourself, all that matters is the narrative the police build against you.

@Mr Oooo Weee You have prejudices and biases. You absolutely have them. You cannot get rid of them. You might not even realize that you have them, but you do. You might not want to admit you have them, but you have them.

 It does NOT matter if you and I 'justify' them or not. You have them, and you can never get rid of them.

So next time you try to act all high and mighty, claiming you are free from biases and prejudice, you will be wrong.

@Justin Madrid lol my dude is trying to justify prejudice.. Fucking amazing..

@Justin Madrid lol my dude is trying to justify prejudice.. Fucking amazing..

@Justin Madrid I can address all all of your points but a yt comment section isn't optimal can I contact you some other way?

@Justin Madrid I can address all all of your points but a yt comment section isn't optimal can I contact you some other way?

@Justin Madrid I'll check actual justice warrior thanks for the recommendation.I agree this yt section is too small for me to fully explain myself so would you mind giving me your discord?  You seem to be able to engage in actual intellectual debate

@Justin Madrid statical proof that black people get out for just being black. And also "if you don't want to be treated like a Walmart employee don't dress like one" according to this logic in order to be treated like a decent human being I have to dress like one, this is problematic because clothing taste is subjective. That is a pretty fucked up saying

@Banana is Superior Statistical proof of what?

@Banana is Superior Statistical proof of what?

@Justin Madrid I need statistical proof of this one to believe it

@Justin Madrid I need statistical proof of this one to believe it

@Justin Madrid What does his past convictions matter? Yes a past history of crime makes you more suspicious in the eyes of the police, but if he didn't do it then he didn't do it. Its just awful, corrupt policing to immediately jump to conclusions like this and put an innocent man in jail.

Most people who were wrongfully imprisoned won massive lawsuits against the state. Theres lawyers who will work for a piece of that pie since its almost guaranteed money. Nothing will ever give him back those 2 years he lost, but I hope he got something to make up for it.

@Guillaume Thevenot Oh please. He spent less than a week in jail, and got 46,000 dollars. If anything, that event will actually give him MORE confidence in the justice system, showing him that a shitty detective will not be able to jail someone just because he wants to.

The man was mistreated, absolutely, but he was MORE than compensated, so he cannot claim that the end result was unjust.  Do you have any idea how short 1 week is? Do you have any idea how much 46,000 dollars is?

@Justin Madrid He didn't "made" 46 000$, he received compensation for receiving so much trauma from police that he might never believe the system again

@Justin Madrid He didn't "made" 46 000$, he received compensation for receiving so much trauma from police that he might never believe the system again

@Some guy The judge typically gets to decide if someone can be let out on bail or not by setting their bail price. If you have a criminal history, dress like shit, and display aggressive and angry behaviors, a judge is likely going to side against you. 9 times out of the 10 the judge is keeping a vile criminal off the streets, but sometimes innocent people have to sit in jail awaiting their trial. How do you dramatically decrease the chances of this happening to you? Don't have a criminal history, do not be aggressive, don't look like a stereotypical criminal.

The system is not perfect, and never will be.  But there are things you can do to protect yourself.

Also I do agree, something should be done about people having to wait ages for their trial. The right to a speedy trial seems to be non existent in many cases.

@Justin Madrid, right that true but this guy was sitting in jail waiting for trial. Once he had his trial he got off.  I guess he could have been out on bail waiting trial if he didn't have convictions but that might not be the case either.  I'm just speculating the bail option.

Whats a problem is that in the US innocent people can be held indefinitely awaiting trial based on false accusations or bad policing.  I'm not sure there is a way to fix that problem but it is a problem.

Imagine being accused of a crime you didn't commit. Being in jail for several years before a jury cleared you.  It's terrible.

@Some guy Not necessarily. If you falsely accuse someone who has a criminal record, has a poor appearance, and displays fits of rage and aggression during questioning, you are more likely to succeed with your false accusation. Now, if you try to falsely accuse someone with zero criminal history, and who keeps their appearance up, and is well spoken, calm, and well mannered, it is going to be much harder to pin a violent assault conviction on him.

If you have a criminal history, and if you dress poorly, and you behave in an aggressive manner, the investigators are going to come down on you, the judge is going to be biased towards you, and the jury will be working against you as well.

Go back to grade school. When Bully Billy is accused of bullying someone, the teacher immediately throws him in time out, no questions asked. But when Studious Sally is accused of something, the teacher goes out of her way to side with Sally, and ensure that she does not get a time out.

@Justin Madrid, all your points are valid the only argument I have is the guy with the beard did not go to jail because of the way he looked or his criminal record.   He was waiting trial because he was falsely accused.  That could be anyone.  The Black guy was lucky no one accused him or he would have been screwed worse than 3 day.  The police had absolutely nothing on him. He was just the first guy they saw.

@Justin Madrid It is possible to try to be fair even while it's natural to be biased biased. You need to want to tho. Biases are us being lazy (default state of conserving recources) at best, and a lot more insidious at worst.
 There's a 'debate' on "objective journalism", how it's impossible and that the real goal should be fair reporting.
  It's all about the values you have.

@CrazyDragy Sure. But what I am saying is, the justice system is operated by humans, and humans are biased. Thus, the justice system is inherently biased, and there is nothing you can do about it. It is impossible to have a justice system free of biases. Why do you think defendants dress like they are attending a fancy wedding when they go to court, despite never wearing a suit in their life? Because if they don't. the jury will automatically assume they are guilty.

60 years ago the justice system put black people in jail just for acting slightly suspicious, and today the justice system is releasing black people back onto the streets just because they are black and people feel guilty for putting a black person in jail, despite the black person being a hardened criminal. If you try to remove your bias, you just end up overcorrecting and develop new biases. It is impossible for humans not to be biased, therefore it is impossible for the justice system not be biased.

Technically, the media is supposed to be incompatible with bias, but we both know the media is the most biased institution in existence in every country.

@Justin Madrid No one is denying that biases exist. We are saying that they are incompatible with a justice system as it pretends to be "just". We're saying they violate the whole base concept of it so it's bullshit.

@Justin Madrid No one is denying that biases exist. We are saying that they are incompatible with a justice system as it pretends to be "just". We're saying they violate the whole base concept of it so it's bullshit.

@CrazyDragy Again. You keep accusing ME of things. I am talking about how SOCIETY views people, NOT MYSELF. I am NOT saying these biases we have are a good or bad thing. I am not even claiming that I have or do not have these specific biases mentioned above. I am ONLY pointing out that these biases exist in society. Keep me out of this. I am talking as an observer.

If you go to a job interview dressed as a clown, do NOT expect the company to hire you. Does this mean I agree with it? Maybe, maybe not, but doesn't matter. I am simply saying that this is just how humans are, and it is virtually impossible to undo because humans naturally and instinctively develop biases about every thing down to what color and shape our food is.

Even if you manage to convince someone that traditional stereotypical 'criminal' traits are nothing to worry about, they will just develop new biases to replace the old. For example, many 'hipsters' dress very 'weird', wearing wildly colored clothing, blue hair, intentionally ugly hair cuts, oversized glasses, etc. They say that they should not  be judged based on how they dress, but the thing is, those people are the FIRST people to harshly judge someone who dresses up in a rural 'countryesque' style, like blue jeans, belt, plaid shirt, and ball cap.

@Justin Madrid Sp then scrap the whole justice system first because it's not built around that premise. It's built to be "just" and "objective".<br> I'm not above our instincts, but then don't clown on others by picking and choosing what suits you and let's just be the animals that we are if that's all we are defined by.

@Justin Madrid Sp then scrap the whole justice system first because it's not built around that premise. It's built to be "just" and "objective".
 I'm not above our instincts, but then don't clown on others by picking and choosing what suits you and let's just be the animals that we are if that's all we are defined by.

@Justin Madrid That first guy was not dressed like a gang member, or a clown, or a wal-mart employee.  Just a regular guy (but think he was black.  Can't fix that dress code in the eyes of police, can you?)

@Justin Madrid That first guy was not dressed like a gang member, or a clown, or a wal-mart employee.  Just a regular guy (but think he was black.  Can't fix that dress code in the eyes of police, can you?)

@Finlay Miles Very good point, first guy had no criminal history but was still treated like a criminal.

@Finlay Miles Very good point, first guy had no criminal history but was still treated like a criminal.

@Justin Madrid I half agree with you, but many innocent people are so convicted and go to prison as well.
I'm sure he did the crime but even people innocent in the eyes of the law do things far worse, they're just never caught.
Guy learned his lesson, kept his nose clean, and the police treat him like a pos because he did something stupid earlier in his life.
Everyone deserves a second chance.

@Justin Madrid<br>You're what's wrong with society. How is it not presentable to look like the guy with the beard? Millions of other people look just the same. I can't stand people like you who look down on others that you think are worse off than yourself.

@Justin Madrid
You're what's wrong with society. How is it not presentable to look like the guy with the beard? Millions of other people look just the same. I can't stand people like you who look down on others that you think are worse off than yourself.

@CrazyDragy Humans develop biases for a reason. Whether they are just or not is not easy to surmise. Humans evolved to develop biases to increase the survival of species. Without biases, we would go extinct very quickly.

Sometimes a bias that you consider unjust actually ends up saving someone's life or property.

If someone signs up for a baby-sitting job, and posts their picture online, and is covered with tattoos, sporting a huge unkept beard and has a grill on their teeth that says 'Dead Man', no one in their right mind would hire them for a baby-sitting job. Would you hire that person? Perhaps you think you have intellectually ascended beyond having biases? Your child won't have a good ending if you ignore your biases.

@Justin Madrid No one says we don't expect biases. Them being accepted still doesn't make them okay or just.

@Justin Madrid No one says we don't expect biases. Them being accepted still doesn't make them okay or just.

@Justin Madrid So you're telling people to adhere to your standards of appearance and be judged not by their actions but your preconceived biases and be happy with it?<br> I suppose manipulation of psychology doesn't inherently clash with personal freedom, but being proud of your ignorance and biases just because you're comfortable in them is not a good look. If we are only animals then why do we need laws?

@Justin Madrid So you're telling people to adhere to your standards of appearance and be judged not by their actions but your preconceived biases and be happy with it?
 I suppose manipulation of psychology doesn't inherently clash with personal freedom, but being proud of your ignorance and biases just because you're comfortable in them is not a good look. If we are only animals then why do we need laws?

@CrazyDragy It is not against personal freedom to advise people to be presentable. You guys keep jumping to these wild conclusions. Don't dress like a Wal-Mart employee if you don't want to be treated like one, don't dress like a clown if you don't want to be treated like one, and don't dress up as a gang member if you don't want to be treated like one. You can if you want, no one is stripping your freedom to do so, but I am simply saying that your life will be better if you look nice and talk nice. Is that too fucking hard to comprehend?

@Justin Madrid You're literally saying don't look a certain way because that's how criminals can look, as if that's how the world works. That's against personal freedom you know?

@Justin Madrid You're literally saying don't look a certain way because that's how criminals can look, as if that's how the world works. That's against personal freedom you know?

@Justin Madrid "be presentable, don't build up a criminal history, and show some manners, and people will be far less likely to assume you are a criminal."

absolutely ridiculous point to make given the other guy in this video did exactly that and yet the cops take it as a given that he is a criminal

@CrazyDragy How the fuck did you get that message from my comment lmao. In a nutshell, all I am saying is... be presentable, don't build up a criminal history, and show some manners, and people will be far less likely to assume you are a criminal.

@Justin Madrid So just because he got jail time for robbery or whatever, and then eventually learned his lesson and moved on to be a hard working man, that justifies the police’s behaviour in this case? That’s exactly what’s wrong with the justice system. They see what they wanna see, and will get the outcome that they want solely based on the fact that because he used to be a criminal, it will be easier for them to charge him and imprison him. Just confirmation bias, it’s ridiculous.

Oops. Maybe he shouldn't have destroyed his reputation by going to prison for robbery earlier in his life. That is what caused people to not believe him. But yeah, he should get reimbursed, and that girl who wrongfully accused him should go to prison for life.


I wouldn't be satisfied with $46K, or whatever it was. I want to meet him in a back alley.


What have we learned today kids? Don’t talk to cops. Be like Jeff.

@Extravaganzoyeur Because people usually want to talk and explain themselves and the media works hard to make it look like asking for a lawyer and using your right to remain silent is suspicious and something only a guilty person would do.  Copaganda is all over the place.

better stop talking to my father then lol

better stop talking to my father then lol

Hell yes Jeff is a legend I just hope he has a lifetime supply of coke and butterfingers lol

@UltimateBROS25 there ain't no reason to take a chance with a possible " good apple"

@Esteban Outeiral Dias well i have had two main arteries slashed open and the doctors helped me not the coppers

Wonder what y'all be doing if someone went missing, or if you get stabbed or anything actually lmao

@Umi ZoomR and thats how they coerce you into talking to them 😉

@anarchocompactdick <br>That would only raise the suspicion

@anarchocompactdick
That would only raise the suspicion

@UltimateBROS25 The "bad apples" excuse is often heard after organizational failures, and it misses the point by accusing the bad apples -- and not the rotting barrel. The barrel (system) which holds all of the apples (cops) is bad -- therefore, none of the apples can really be good.

Hif  Though, for the record, the police are expected to let you use the restroom routinely if you’re being held in interrogation for more than a couple of hours. Forcing someone to piss themselves would be considered cruel and unusual treatment, and it would be very easy for a defense attorney to have the interrogation thrown out of court.

Hif  Watch “The Legend of Jeff” video by Jim Can’t Swim. A drug addict named Jeff has mastered the art of getting arrested, demanding a can of Coke and a candy bar in interrogation, then when he’s finished he says he has no idea what they’re talking about, and wants an attorney. At that point he clams up and the police are forced to take him back to his holding cell because he’s not talking lol

Or if you talk to them make sure you learn from Michael

And thats why i enjoy america because you can ask for one

@Strivingtoonedaybeuseful Just gonna throw in the obligatory ACAB

@UltimateBROS25 a few? This happens fsr to often. So many lives have been destroyed, constantly because of their negligence and lack of professionalism. Deaths, mental health issues and a lack of trust in the police has resulted because of these under trained and incompetent people. It is not a few. It is the majority. Just look up testimony from former cops about how their system really works. That will change your mind.

danimalmx3 I would to speak to my attorney before making a comment please.

“wing-ding, thank you for the coke, put me back in the cell.”<br>Man’s a bloody legend 😂😂😂

“wing-ding, thank you for the coke, put me back in the cell.”
Man’s a bloody legend 😂😂😂

Don’t talk to the police. But do pretend like you’re going to until after you’ve finished your Coke.

Absolutely. It's just unbelievable how many people dig their own grave in the interrogation room!

"No offense but I'd like to make use of my right to remain silent until i've spoken to a lawyer. Thank you."
(Repeat as many times as necessary.)

How F'ing hard is that?!

danimalmx3 <br>Yeah, respect law enforcement, but if they’ve brought you in they’re opposition and should be treated as such.

danimalmx3
Yeah, respect law enforcement, but if they’ve brought you in they’re opposition and should be treated as such.

Also hammered home the point that cops lie on a regular basis to try to catch you lying. Actually, they just lie in general bc most of the time they get away with it. Not all cops of course, but enough to ruin the reputation of police as a whole.

UltimateBROS25 it’s not even about a few bad apples. It’s just not in your best interest to talk to any cops.

Unfortunately that wouldn't have worked for these 2. The one guy would have still been jailed for 2 and 1/2 days (maybe longer since they wouldn't have investigated that picture he drew out), and the other guy would have still served 2 years even if he hadn't said anything. Our system is messed up that one person can lie and put a person in jail like that. Especially if the accuser is a woman, and the accused is a man.

Jeeeefffffffff still waiting on that candy bar lol

A couple crooks or a lot of them in the police, Doesn't matter they still aren't your friend nor your ally.

@UltimateBROS25 This isn't about a few bad apples it's about the entire mentality they all commonly have. Some have better judgement of their ego than others is the only separating factor. A LOT of cops are on similar tracks as these, statistics proves that and logic does as well. A job with high amounts of power for relatively little experience and aptitude that is guaranteed immunity from most 'mistakes' is going to attract a certain type of person. I think you can guess what type that may be.

Legend has it he took 4 quaters out that detectives ass n bought that snickers he was promised

Nah, Jeff's not going anywhere anytime soon

Don't talk to the cops. Don't. No exceptions.

Brad Neff probably the best option we got at this point 🤣🤣

yall rlly take full advantage of a few bad apples

Mohamed Hefny I know right. I fucking love this channel.

The ultimate conclusion after every video.

The ultimate conclusion after every video.


Interrogator- I've got nothing to gain either way<br>BS!!!

Interrogator- I've got nothing to gain either way
BS!!!


These cops playing games with people’s lives


That investigator is a shame for his guild.


༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つБлядь


The police aren't after “the truth”, they're after a conviction, which is not the same thing, and sometimes anyone will do.

DMoogle the vast overwhelming majority of police do not have an agenda of treating people badly as you and petrol are implying. Most often, they are called to the scene and that's where things can go wrong with criminals who have something to hide. They don't drive around looking for minorities to abuse for funsies.

Hey officer, not many criminals are worried about being to work at 8AM.  And then to be locked up for 3 days while you’re innocent; I’m not sure how I would have dealt with that. I’m glad he got a settlement and this officer is lucky to still have a job. It sounded like he was starting to believe him though and still failed to find the truth- major fuckup

Both USA and my country NZ need to get rid of the privatized prison industry. USA has the highest prison population per capita and NZ has the second highest.

@Cutland Springs the fact that there are criminals doesn't justify police lying on having "evidence" on innocent people. Cops who do this are not much better than the criminals they're supposedly after. Glad the first guy was smart enough to stop talking and lawyer up.

@Tarot for the Heathens petrol was arguing that, as a cop, you should put your duty to humanity over the duty of being an enforcer. If your job is to treat innocent people badly, or harm them for the sake of some code or conduct, then you have a duty to disobey that code or conduct. Its why the military doesn't have the excuse: "my commanding officer told me to do it!" when it comes to crimes during wartime. You have a duty to act as a good person should, not as others tell you to act.

They want to convict someone as fast as possible so they can put the case to rest while they still get the rewards

@Andrew Demarest Don't know about your country, but there's fack all money in being a cop in my country.  They're in it for the power.  Maybe some started out with naive good intentions, but it gets the better of them in the end in most cases.  Also, you don't need good education results to get into cop college.

Tarot for the Heathens and you definitely missed a couple steps. 1) be rich or able to afford a good lawyer 2) pray you don’t get charged. Even if you’re innocent and have a decent lawyer, it’s still 50/50.3) pray you get compensated. Let’s not ignore the hundreds of cases where everything comes straight out of the victim’s pocket. 4) access your behavior at all times. Try to defend yourself too much, you seem more guilty. 5) have a good job. One that allows you to be absent for multiple days without prior warning. Definitely going to need that job to pay off the lawyer and court fees

Tarot for the Heathens sorry, how is an unarmed individual a threat to someone carrying a loaded weapons? If they’re that trigger happy, they shouldn’t have the job.

petrol wrong. You don't get to fight the police at the time of arrest. You become a threat and now their lives are in danger. Go ahead and get arrested if you're innocent. Fight it in court and win loads of cash. Don't fight it on the street.

exactly, they dont care about people or justice, just getting another little mark on their paper showing they completed the work. The only thing they want is money.

@doni well, these aren't people that would be shot if they disobeyed - fired maybe, but it's no excuse. If you're forced to treat innocent people badly, you have a duty not to comply.

Its at the fault of the system. Same fact that traffic cops need to meet a quota with how many tickets they need to give out. They’re just trying to make a living most of the time.


Bruh, I wanted to finish watching wrath of jodi

SAME, comments weren’t showing and my dumb ass exited the video to see if I opened it again it will fix itself 🧍🏻♀


Nothing would've happened to the cops in America sadly.


Problem is everyone sitting in that chair is Guilty until proven innocent in the eyes of the interrogator


I'm a little satisfied that the interrogator was demoted and Michael got some compensation.<br>Sucks for the other guy, though.

I'm a little satisfied that the interrogator was demoted and Michael got some compensation.
Sucks for the other guy, though.

The interrogator should have been send to prison with the killers and rapists. Because he is exactly on their level.

@Bob Marlon the whole agony of unknown, spending your time in a shithole, having to explain to prospective employer why you were arrested to start with - is not worth those 46k.<br>Ppl are suspicious by nature: no matter how you explain your wrongful imprisonment they'll be thinking "there must be something else there..."

@Bob Marlon the whole agony of unknown, spending your time in a shithole, having to explain to prospective employer why you were arrested to start with - is not worth those 46k.
Ppl are suspicious by nature: no matter how you explain your wrongful imprisonment they'll be thinking "there must be something else there..."

@AIWFNW almost had me in tears watching that after he said that, that's some real fucked up stuff

Yeah, I felt a bit of satisfaction hearing that, but then I thought about how the guy was just fucked with for 3-4 days, unable to do anything. Then I felt bad again.

@ROCKDEES1 ahaha agreed but would you risk it though? Even if I told "don't worry bro, will be exonerated in 3 days and get 50k!" I would still be reluctant to go through the experience

@I_Am_Asian_But_It_Doesnt_Mean_Im_Better_Than_You ! Not sure about Canada, but in US the record stays with you. Record expungement or sealing is BS. It's still there accessible by FBI.<br>The investigator is typical cop we love to hate: no matter what you saying since he decided you are guilty. BTW the cop used so called Reid method that allowed lying about evidence.

@I_Am_Asian_But_It_Doesnt_Mean_Im_Better_Than_You ! Not sure about Canada, but in US the record stays with you. Record expungement or sealing is BS. It's still there accessible by FBI.
The investigator is typical cop we love to hate: no matter what you saying since he decided you are guilty. BTW the cop used so called Reid method that allowed lying about evidence.

@Marceline he went to jail not prison. While you wait trial you can be in that limbo for years, even if absolutely innocent. Only after they fail to prove your guilt, will you be able to leave jail. Its daunting but its a reality.

@Marceline wrong he went to jail for 2 years for this 6:53 to 7:03

Marceline you could be in jail awaiting trial, and the trial can be suspended for years

@zeddyf 10:03 to 10:16 he didn't go to jail he was proven innocent.

@zeddyf plus the dude was trying to turn his life around..living with his Mom and working for "Labor Ready"...

@zeddyf I understand, no one would like being put under that awful stress. The positives are he was cleared, bad guys demoted, and he received great compensation. Come to think of it, if I knew the outcome I wouldn't mind spending 3 days in jail for that amount.😄

@ROCKDEES1 I would rather never have to receive those 46k in the first place. To be in that position for even a few hours must be life scarring.

@XxCOOKEExxMONSTARxX @7:00
It was 3 years when he was jail led previously but 2 yrs wrongful imprisonment this time

The other guy was unfortunately complicated because he had a "witness" testifying against him (possibly two if the boyfriend did as well) for a crime that he had a prior history of doing. It really sucks and hopefully he was able to sue them into the ground.

zeddyf no he didn’t, that was in his younger years not for this case

@zeddyf that's just sad man. He's reputation probably went downhill even if he wasn't guilty.

"Michael was kept in jail for 3 and a half days... Officers were demoted and suspended without pay."  Michael got a nice paycheck for those 3 days he spent in jail as an innocent man.

@I_Am_Asian_But_It_Doesnt_Mean_Im_Better_Than_You ! I believe he means Justin,  the beardy guy, that spent 2 years in jail until proven innocent.


Hes from Canada that explains why he was so nice.


Check out the Marco Tubic case in Toronto Canada.  Hasn't been told yet...


Never talk to a cop.  Never never never never.


“I have a duty to ensure the truth is paramount” he says after manipulating and lying to the suspect

@Smokey298 Not trying to bully someone but lying can be effective. The cops just have to be better tat their jobs tbh. These suspects really didn't seem like they were lying. Bald dude literally called out the cop's exact bluff.

@jd123 The problem is wrongful convictions.  Lying and trying to bully someone into a confession is not using a clever technique to discover the truth.

@UnknownArchive It's an accepted interrogation technique, sure. But then, how do you tell a cop "It's okay to lie in these situations, but not others." ? Answer : You can't.
Once you tell them it's okay to lie, they will lie about everything, sometimes a lie of omission to make sure the charges "stick", sometimes lies of outright fabrication to cover their own ass.

@UnknownArchive It's an accepted interrogation technique, sure. But then, how do you tell a cop "It's okay to lie in *these* situations, but not others." ? Answer : You can't.
Once you tell them it's okay to lie, they will lie about everything, sometimes a lie of omission to make sure the charges "stick", sometimes lies of outright fabrication to cover their own ass.

If you don't know your rights, you have no rights. The 5th amendment not self incriminate, but we are too busy with our lives and let others decide our future by hiring an attorney which his first duty is to the courts not the people, get caged in prison, and the best we do is comply about how the system and politicians are corrupt, but never about or lazyness or ignorance.

@UnknownArchive <br>yes I think it is certainly moving in the right direction especially with more accountability through body cameras and through the means you just expressed.

@UnknownArchive
yes I think it is certainly moving in the right direction especially with more accountability through body cameras and through the means you just expressed.

@420Effect True but that happens less and less each day. Cities HATE liability. Police lawsuits are a large part of that. One bad cop being bad can cost a city a LOT of money. They look at it like this: Officer Dummy cost us 100k. That 100k was ready for roads, community projects, schools, etc. Now they have to cut back on everything because of one stupid cop. The way they prevent that? Outfit all of their officers with cameras. Then if it's logged the city CAN fire the officer. I think you inspired me to do a video on the subject!

@UnknownArchive Touche, but often the  lie is to get a confession and the confession to get a conviction and if those requirements are met then the cop in many ways has been successful regardless of if they convict someone who is innocent. There are a lot of cops who just want the confessions for personal gain and don't actually care if they got the right guy. there are also a ton of awesome cops who are great people who do everything in their power to make sure the right guy is caught. Too often it is the prior which is unfortunate.

@420Effect debatable. What if that lie was to protect an extreme situation? If by lying they say, find a lost child, the idea of a conscience might be reversed. Could their conscience handle NOT lying to protect someone? A conscience differs greatly from one to the next

@Crimson 6 hello! I binge watch crimi al stuff

This cop has an accent and he does not belong in this country..  he should be sent back where he came from.. We have enough trouble here without importing
Trouble...I hope he was disciplined but probably not..
I love my country and it shouldn't  be ignored what he did.. years ago this poor man could he framed and sent to  prison..

@UnknownArchive Wasn't expecting you here man.

@jd123 If its illegal to lie to cops it shpuld be illegal for them to lie to you.  If cops lie to innocent people, then it breaks the trust between them and the civillians whom they serve

Ryan Waege I don’t really know what you’re talking about.

He can use whatever strategy he wants, the problem wasn’t his strategy it was his job performance

@Jen Wombat Excelsior First and foremost their duty is to protect the innocent, we are all innocent until proven guilty, it's a fundamental pillar of society and I don't see how anyone can get away with this kind of negligence given as you say the level of responsibility in their hands. It should just be an automatic firing if the most basic due diligence is not being done and this should be being monitored at all stages of the investigation, they are simply not fit for that level of responsibility plain and simple.  I'm quite sure any other profession that has this much level of responsibility, it would be a criminal offence to destroy someone's life.   All this simply leads to a lack of trust of those who are there, at its most basic level, to serve and protect which ultimately leads to much bigger issues we are seeing today on a wider scale with trust.  They can only rely on a thorough investigation and a thorough one would have sent an innocent person home rather quickly, which is what every person has the right and must expect I might add, rather than clutching at straws trying to force some evidence.  There has got to be a failing of training here if that many got it wrong on that one investigation.

Exactly!!! I don’t believe that officer told one truth or even knows the meaning of the word!!! No wonder so many innocents end up in jail.

@jd123 uhhh yeah, let's ignore that he disregarded the dispatch description. Let's ignore that post-interrogation they illegally detained him without evidence for 3 days. Nothing wrong here, that's why he and two of his buds were demoted. Too bad that civil cases can't be filed against the individual cop so that they, not the tax payer bears the burden of a judgement.

Stop believing the Cop fairy tale. The roots of the profession began in protecting the interests of the rich and powerful and they never evolved past that.

Well, for those doubting he's full of shit and shouldn't be doing the job....he didn't do a very good job now did he? He didn't arrest the actual perpetrator. He's grilling someone who's innocent, and he could have easily referred back to the dispatch. This could have been a lot worse. It is a lot worse in MANY instances.  They have our lives in their hands, and they know it and when they shirk that responsibility? Lives are lost and destroyed. It's not like if someone got the order wrong in a drive-thru. It's incarceration or worse. It shows a lack of quality in his work ethic, honestly. Should get demoted or reprimanded in some way.

I see nothing wrong with his tactics, he just kept it up too long after the guy was pretty clearly not hiding anything

Well it’s a common tactic to lie like he does, but this is only used after a while into the interview where the directive already sees holes in your story.

They are allowed, and ENCOURAGED to lie. There's nothing to keep them from doing so

You nailed it. "Truth" is what these creeps create out of thin air to further their career.

I think the correct form of that word is doody....that's his doody...since he's FULL OF IT. (shit, I mean.)


your voice should be on Netflix bro, how to fuck are stil not famous?


justice was fkn SERVED!!!!!!!  demoted ....


Shouldn’t the investigator be charged by false claims? This is definitely not the appropriate way to deal with this case. I’m aware that not everybody in the same position would be innocent but such irony he saids himself that he’s treating everyone as individuals.


During witch hunt they tortured women to the point they confessed everything. Sad to see the practices didnt change much


The lying cop saying “what matters to me is the truth” is the filthiest and most disturbing thing Ive heard.

The lying cop saying “what matters to me is the truth” is the filthiest and most disturbing thing Ive heard.

@Kyle Philipe you're very naive... They coerce you into admitting incriminating stuff, even if you didn't do it.

@Kyle Philipe you're very naive... They coerce you into admitting incriminating stuff, even if you didn't do it.

@Superkayko exactly. I've heard several testimonies of people pushed to make false confessions and then ended up in prison. One particularly horrible story was that of a young voy who discovered his murdered sister at home and was basically tortured for days, deprived of sleep and food and then made to confesse the murder if he wanted to get out of there...

@vetacoth  yeah I lied no where. So nice to see you try to get the flip and seem to take the high road lol. Nice try.

@vetacoth  yeah I lied no where. So nice to see you try to get the flip and seem to take the high road lol. Nice try.

@Remorce Look up what projection means. Didn’t seem so obvious to you when you wrote the comment. Your need get emotional and lie then fail to provoke someone you don’t know over the internet is just weird. I hope life is treating you well, buddy.

@vetacoth   oh wow I never thought of it like that <b>sarcasm</b> Funny how people point out the obvious like its a revelation from god. Dude you obviously didnt read the comments in here. Laziness in kids these days I guess. Did you read the comment where I said this was in jest? Obviously not.

@vetacoth   oh wow I never thought of it like that *sarcasm* Funny how people point out the obvious like its a revelation from god. Dude you obviously didnt read the comments in here. Laziness in kids these days I guess. Did you read the comment where I said this was in jest? Obviously not.

@ChrisSquid depends on your lifestyle. If you have a house, car on payment and go to jail and lose them to years of incarceration then defo not worth it. Homeless, cant hold a job then defo worth it. Perspective mate. Theres always a counter argument.

@Kyle Philipe really? How so you ask? Because the pecker cop says “what matters to me is the TRUTH” when he wouldn’t know the truth if it bit him in the a$$! That IS filthy and disturbing-  Glad he got a small compensation. Not nearly enough for the emotional and psychological bs of almost being wrongly convicted.

@Kyle Philipe Wtf do you mean how so the cop lied and said he had the guy on camera robbing the place, that's why he was arrested. These pos cops got off easy they all should have been fired and thrown in jail for arresting an innocent man.

@Remorce Hindsite 20/20. This man wasn't looking at the situation in front of him as "3.5 days and I make 46k". He was looking at it as if he's getting falsely accused of a serious crime and may end up losing the rest of his life over it. This is a stressful situation and it's easy for you to lazily say that having the outcome presented to you in such a clear manner. I'd be hard pressed to believe that you would take up a series of serious life-altering allegations for the off chance that you end up like this guy, and even in that perspective lies the bias that you've been exposed to this man's situation and think this outcome is the norm when in reality it's not.

@Kyle Philipe Purposefully lying and trying to get an innocent person to confess is not even remotely a mistake. Obviously police officers can make minor mistakes but things like these are not mistakes and are just blatantly wrong

@Remorce this guy was way luckier than most people who are falsely arrested, especially those who are falsely convicted. Most of the time whatever they win in a case (if they win anything) is not even remotely worth what they went through

@cody davis I "talk like a Rick and Morty cringe post" yet you literally just told me to "read a book lol"

@cody davis I "talk like a Rick and Morty cringe post" yet you literally just told me to "read a book lol"

@cody davis there are few things more dangerous than a man convinced of his own moral certitude, as you have demonstrated.

@cody davis there are few things more dangerous than a man convinced of his own moral certitude, as you have demonstrated.

@cody davis May God have mercy on your soul

@cody davis May God have mercy on your soul

@cody davis That's what I thought, freak. I thought you would be incapable of explaining your own philosophy and I also thought you were suggesting an end to my life..... Me, someone you dont know at all and over YouTube at that. You should probably take a hard look at yourself, if you are under 18 then I kinda understand and forgive you.

@cody davis you want to further elaborate on that?

@cody davis you want to further elaborate on that?

@Kyle Philipe If you watched the video, the narrator stated that a cop getting a confession out of an accused without hard evidence would grant them a huge promotion, suggesting that that’s what the cop was aiming for and thus, why Viral V called the cop disgusting for it.

@Kyle Philipe hmmm lying about evidence, definitely not filthy right

/s

@Kyle Philipe hmmm lying about evidence, definitely not filthy right

/s

I wouldn't have been able to keep my composure in that situation. I woulda saw right through him and, god forbid, given him a reason to find me guilty by whoopin his lyin ass right there on camera. I'm not a violent man but about the only way you'll ever get charges put against me is to try and frame me for other charges and see what i do to that person.

@doperification well everybody heard it here, you settled it. The funny thing is I bet you actually believe that in your little head.

@doperification well everybody heard it here, you settled it. The funny thing is I bet you actually believe that in your little head.

@Kyle Philipe If you dont think the cops deserve to be demoted for this you're really in a world of your own lol. Rewatch the video because they had some glaring infringements of standard operating procedure that you're conveniently ignoring

@Kyle Philipe how is any of that a buzzword you heathen?

@Kyle Philipe how is any of that a buzzword you heathen?

@ShadyNasty why arent you a little <i>buzzword</i>

@ShadyNasty why arent you a little _buzzword_

@Kyle Philipe bootlickers everywhere huh

@Kyle Philipe bootlickers everywhere huh

@Juan its Goodharts law : "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure" an interrogation is supposed to be used to figure out the truth but a lot of cops are only trying to get a confession which is only possible if you are guilty, so if they are trying to get you to admit to a crime they already are assuming you are guilty they don't care about the truth.

@Remorce - I concede that where you live actually could make a difference. That said, there are psychopaths and sociopaths everywhere, and especially in Government, and positions of power.

@Sovereign Citizen LEO  where you live makes a huge difference. Civil lawsuits work way different in Canada vs the United States. But what ev's. Getting off topic.

That's just how they interrogate people, though. What matters is that they didn't properly check the witness alibis (they saw a white, short man) and that they didn't treat him decently. The lying technique would've likely worked if they actually looked for a white short man. If you rob a bank or whatever it was, they catch you and say that they have you on camera, they have a high chance of them just admitting to it.

@Kyle Philipe It took a completely separate investigator to look into it.  The one interrogating him didn't even investigate anything on the subjects side of the story like he said he was going to.

@Remorce - My comment was cut-off for some reason (it was at least 4 paragraphs long). I wasn't stating anything negative toward you. I was just stating that it is very difficult to actually win a civil rights lawsuit, let alone find a lawyer who will take your case without you paying up front (or at least a large detainer), unless there is easily observable/ easily found clear cut evidence. In this case obviously there was. But in most, there is not. Anyone would trade a few days in jail if they thought there was a good chance they could win $50K. My point was simply that it's extremely rare, and extremely difficult to actually do so. Where you live makes little difference.

@Sovereign Citizen LEO well that was pretty much said in jest. So maybe some clarification. 1 I live in Canada and suing the cops for holding you doesnt really exist here so in the end my comment counts as squat. 2 I trained Police for 10 years. I know tons of lawyers and crown prosecutors that would love to help me out if I ever stumbled into a "situation". The last just shows that you dont know everyones position on certain occurances. I could go into though on statistics and sociological systems to push the point of my jest. But that'd be boring and as I said I made a funny.__. kinda?

@Liam ignore that guy he's a know it all, you see how he said "pretty some stuff to criminal psychology" like he's actually an expert but I think he was actually trying to say its "pretty simple stuff in criminal psychology" but he clearly didnt watch the whole video lol

@Remorce - Good luck with that. In the case of this guy, he had video on the bus, the bus driver, and other corroborating evidence. Most people do not. They are not going to accept the alibi of your friend or family member or girlfriend. And the issue here even if you have some amount of evidence, is finding a lawyer that will take your case. Most lawyers in this arena (and lawyers in general in my mind) are pure scum. Their oath to the Constitution, means nothing.

They don't want to do any work if they don't feel it's a slam dunk they will get paid for their efforts. So unless you are prepared to pony up potentially $tens of thousands of dollars for their fees, they might not take your case. And if you lose the case, then you lose that money also. If the cops, DAs/ Prosecutors, or Lawyers (whether defense attorney or Civil Rights Attorney) are leftists (most are), then you are at an even far greater disadvantage.

Many police departments and DAs Offices will prosecute you regardless of innocence or guilt because they are lazy, don't care, don't have enough personnel/ resources, etc. and put you through a living hell. If you are innocent like I was, but have life long debilitating health issues, you really need help to navigate the process. Especially if they keep you in the system, in this process, for 6.5 years of your life slowing wearing you down to where you are near the point of death.

Because the ultimate goal innocent or guilty, for these DAs/ Prosecutors, is to get you to accept a Plea Agreement. Never forget my words/ advice. If you ever find yourself in such a situation, remember that a public defender, or even private defense attorney like I had, is only as good as they are not lazy (and have other employees/ investigators who are willing to work for you to find exonerating evidence). 60% of people charged with one or more felonies, is innocent of one or more of those felony charges.

Delusional? No.
A critical observer of the world around me? Yes.
You’re not a random person, you are somebody who is advocating for corrupt police officers.  And you don’t know what I think of myself, but you certainly are making a lot of assumptions.... so you’re not only immoral, but not very good at arguing your point, either.

@Kyle Philipe I grew up there and saw his name in the papers all the time. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/hamilton-man-head-wound-fight-downtown-1.4807809
Just google search he makes it to the papers pretty frequently

@Remorce yea I was wondering how he could've been in jail for 2 years on one testimony. It just didnt sound realistic and I would like to know the truth

@Remorce yea I was wondering how he could've been in jail for 2 years on one testimony. It just didnt sound realistic and I would like to know the truth

@Ashley Flores they lie to the suspects in interviews to trick them into confessing.  It's not really a nefarious tactic but it looks that way, somebody has to do it though. That's why I'm not a cop though

@Abraham Peralta so do you have proof of this or did you make it up?

@Abraham Peralta so do you have proof of this or did you make it up?

@Kyle Philipe YES.  And I think you are evil too.<br>In some jobs you cannot make major mistakes.  This is one of them.

@Kyle Philipe YES.  And I think you are evil too.
In some jobs you cannot make major mistakes.  This is one of them.

@Ashley Flores it gets worse than this. The cops were lazy and didnt do the legwork on either. The white dude it said his lawyer tripped her up so bad during court that he was released without prejudice. Dont know where you got years in jail from unless I missed it.

@Remorce True, though at the time he didn't know that. The other guy who was sleeping at his mothers house received years in prison from a single testimony.

@Remorce True, though at the time he didn't know that. The other guy who was sleeping at his mothers house received years in prison from a single testimony.

@Kyle Philipe The interrogator/case managers tried to get him convicted, he was released because other officers looked into the case and quickly realized that they had the wrong person. They were actively lying and holding him for days despite being easily able to verify his claim.

If the other investigator never took up the case Dixon would have gone to jail and those cops would have gotten a promotion. Even in the court hearing Mann was STILL trying to say he believes Dixon guilty. All he had to do was show a pic to theGO bus driver but for whatever reason chose not to. He was turning a blind eye to potentially exonerating witnesses. AKA he was trying to convict Dixon even after he KNEW he was innocent. And he had the fucking nerve to say he's looking for the truth. What a scumbag... oh btw guess where hes at now; promoted to staff serg in 2009.... yikes.

@Liam lets simpifly this, so do you think that because the cops accidently got the wrong guy they are bad?

@Liam lets simpifly this, so do you think that because the cops accidently got the wrong guy they are bad?

@Kyle Philipe Did you not watch the entire video? A separate investigator looked into the evidence 3.5 days later. Cops involved were demoted and accused won a civil case.

@Juan to get a confession??? Which you wouldnt get if the person was innocent so in theory it should work out. Pretty some stuff when it comes to criminal psychology.

That's what lying in its purest form is like. He was convinced the guy had done and had allegedly the undeniable footage of this. Why the interrogation if you have all you need? Who cares why he did it? To make money or get stuff? What kind of a stupide reason for an interrogatory....

@Liam Mccarthy a ton. But thats why there are civil action. Heck I'd trade 3.5 days of bed and 3 squares a day for close to 50k

@Liam Mccarthy a ton. But thats why there are civil action. Heck I'd trade 3.5 days of bed and 3 squares a day for close to 50k

Imagine how often the innocent are found guilty

Imagine how often the innocent are found guilty

How so? The guy was held for a couple days but then they found out the truth and let him go and compensated him. Shitty situation of course, but filthy and disgusting? Seems hyperbolic


Only 46k? They got off light and that cop should turn over his gun and badge.

For three days that’s an amazing amount of money lmao. I was once picked out of a photo lineup by a woman who had her purse stolen. I was at the dermatologist that day and when I got home did a few things. Went out to hang out with a few friends a few hours after I got home. I get a call from my mother saying there’s police at the door and they need to speak to me, they wouldn’t tell her what about.

So I walk to my house, they tell me that a lady picked me out of the photo book and they need me to come to the station to do a lineup. I go without a problem because I know I didn’t do it. I get into the interrogation room and after being questioned i wrote a two page statement of what I did and where I was that day.

They do a lineup and you’ll hear knocks on the window if the person picks you (ie 3 knocks if you’re number three, one knock if you’re number one). The detective comes out into the hallway and says “oh fuck”, I heard that and think that’s great news for me because she must have not picked me. He goes back into the room with her and then I hear the knocks.

Just so happens that I knew someone who was arrested in the cell next to the room where the witnesses look at the suspects in the lineup. On the way to central booking he told me that he overheard the detective saying to the lady “it could’ve been him maybe he was wearing a wig”. If I would’ve had a lawyer present then I wouldn’t have had that happen.

After about ten to twelve hours (plus the additional five or six I was in the precinct) in central booking and being the last person in the room out of like forty people, an officer gets me and lets me out the back door. I never found out what happened and why they let me go.


never trust stranger. you're not a guest and you're in their castle.

always talk to Lawyer,, always.


Being blamed for shit you’ve never done, I’d ascertain, is annoying af.

@II M4X II You got me! Bitchmade is indeed not a word, whatever shall I do…

@II M4X II does the fact that they're half-black bother you? Do you have a problem with half-black people?

@Christopher Lowery So you think everyone will come to use these "abbreviations" eventually?

@II M4X II I’m sure people older than myself found “lol” obnoxious as fuck, when the internet became readily accessible & text messaging took off. I’m 29 now, & while I might’ve cringed the first few times I saw “af”, it’s unreasonable to expect younger people to not speak like those around them. My parents text with abbreviations they’d have never used a decade ago.

@II M4X II man I really thought you were serious till that last comment. Took me a bit to tell if it was trolling or not. Good one. Anyways carry on

Wow, I really got roasted by a few 12-year-old muppets and half-black pot-smokers who think they're hard. And that's not a word, NoodlePapi.

It's more than annoying, it's downright unethical that cops will make up shit (e.g.  had alcohol) and manipulate the accused for a confession to further their own careers. That's the ugly truth of capitalism.

Just "annoying"? It's fucking terrifying tho...

@axel Blue hair, eh? Love Fortnite and Among Us?

@II M4X II What could possibly be annoying about using two letters?

@Forged Sanity How did you know men did that

Don't fucking type "af" and then call somebody else annoying.

I got kicked out of a (free) concert for a 100% bogus reason and even then I was batshit livid about the accusation, can't imagine my fury if I went through this. Still, I might do it for the $46k.


Get a lawyer to check the 'evidence'. Very cheap if you pay for the hour and they don't have any.


Everyone no matter who should watch these videos. Just to be safe


In the UK it's innocent until proven guilty.


It's seriously disturbing that the Investigator says he has nothing to gain by watching the footage. Uhm, how about some integrity for NOT being the guy who falsely charges people?

Plus the part about th 46.000$ also feels extremely good, that Michael is a legend! I wish I would have such composure, but if I was ever accused of a crime, I would much more likely react like the other guy......

OMG, WHAT A GLOOOOOOOOORIOUS FINALE ! Are you kidding me? How can you make that so short in like a throwaway line at the end? I just came!......(21:36)

OMG, WHAT A *GLOOOOOOOOORIOUS* FINALE ! Are you kidding me? How can you make that so short in like a throwaway line at the end? I just came!......(21:36)

@Simple And Effective Hahaha. I love your brainwaves.

@IceMelon true

I'm kinda just hoping that it doesn't happen to me because I'm in high school but I look like a 20 year old

I don't want to make anyone lose their jobs because they assaulted an innocent child but I can and I will

@Simple And Effective at least it wasn't more than even that. Plenty of people get years for crimes they didn't commit.

@Maxwell Lee Sterling  Oof... talk about digging a hole. Your inability to find something is not proof it doesn't exist. Could you imagine if any field of science operated by such logic?

I keep watching that moment and I cannot find any indication that he was refering to the footage when saying he has nothing to gain. What he's talking about is the other guy calling out what he assumes to be the classic "we got evidence against you" bluff, to which the investigator then refers he has nothing to gain from. I'm gonna assume it as an absolute because I simply cannot see that point and say you, and the people replying to this thinking it's true, are no better than that lazy investigator.

@ccbbba laziness that got an innocent man 3 days behind bars.... Its insane

@more booze Nothing to gain. Everything he has to lose.

Its kinda human to take short cuts in thinking, adds confidence even.   But thats not the job he was given, kinda lazy

He didn't want to be proving to be a liar, thats why he had nothing to gain cause it would of destroyed his ego

He takes it for granted that the goal is to jail the accused and not give a shit whether he's guilty or not.


Sooo happy they were demoted, what a clown show.


If you listen closely Michael has the same soothing voice of Bob Ross.


Well its a thing for police dept to find anyone to blame. It is what it is


My man was apologizing for not being guilty. How Canadian of him

Okay... who the fuck put a microphone in my cell?

I don't mean to be an inconvenience  but I infact did not brake into a store and ruin someones shop. My sincere apologies

hahaha he should have given the officer wood cutting tips also.

To quote Stan Edgar from the boys “ I can’t lash out like so entitled beast that is a white man’s luxury” tho then again I’m not 100% how the police are up north

@CannibalisticSqvirrel4ever I'm an American myself, it's pretty easy to spot a fellow countryman in the comment sections, we tend to be a wee bit standoffish

@Robert Watley idk i thought it was just stating facts

@akjohnny bruh there was a lot of positive vibes going on, why bring all that negativity

@SamuraiBurgerDog None of you business lol where?

There's even a law in canada that says if you apologize for a crime it can't be used as evidence.

@Seth Campbell I'm not mad at it bro, have a blessed day

Sorry gang, that’s just how we roll up here.

hahahaha 😂 I am sorry because I didn't commit the crime. that is Hilarious.


Hindsight is never 20/20. Time and distance make details and exculpatory facts less visible.


Did the guy with the beard have a civil suit against anyone? That candy chick or the cops?


demoted and suspended without pay. HA HA HA good


I hope that woman Candy got severely punished for her lies. She deserved prison for perjuring herself like that.

She will be asked about it on the day of Judgement.

@Cal I know just wanted that guy to chill. There is no need to be calling people stupid if they dont get it since people tend to be stupid enoguh to be serious when they say that kind of things.

@みかんの木だお huh???

@みかんの木だお huh???

@RaydenXY the "little innocent and loving creature" is what sells it as sarcasm.

@Martin Hardstyle hahahaha... you dont know how to read. Made my day.

@RaydenXY lol you didn't know it was sarcasm ! hahahahahaha made my day

@RaydenXY You're mad and defensive, because everyone instantly knew it was sarcasm. Everyone, except you.

@xWiranekx Perceptive enough lol. You dindt even bother to read the whole thing. It might be or it might not as i said i havent said that for me it wasnt im just saying that when written you should point out that is sarcasm somehow and you shouldt call people stupid for asuming the oposite. I bet you werent perceptive enough to see that..

@RaydenXY It is. Don't take it as an insult, but you just weren't perceptive enough to notice it.

@RaydenXY nah it's pretty obvious that it's sarcasm..

@Molhem Alaa he's saying that in these cases, most women don't get punished because they are women. So 99% of the time they do not get reprimanded

@RaydenXY
Pay attention to these words and phrases:
'Never' in the first sentence.
'Only' in the second sentence.
And, especially this: "little innocent and loving creature".
These don't look like obvious and intentional exaggeratings to you?
Sarcasm doesn't have to be conveyed through !!!!! only.
For people who have at least a little capacity to think.

@ste07an  he had to write /s at the end. we adopted this common practice because people are stupid and in order for this kinda people to understand we need to mark it aa sarcasm.

@FannyBandit nope. any half assed lawyer would argue she made the statement under duress from the documented domestic abuse situation she was in… which she says in the court trial that she lied because there was a restraining order against him so if she said she had communicated with him, he would have gotten in trouble and yeah nah… she’s not in jail now.. never was.. she’s working as a paralegal

@gthktty 666 lying in court in itself is an illegal offense so she probably got put in jail

She didnt all that happened is that she got her last name stripped away from her now she goes by Candida Pantsofphire.

@gthktty 666 exactly what I was going to say. her abuser made her frame his ex friend because he's straightened his life out. or whatever they had issues with because he said they knew each other and he's beaten Candy before.

@rascarcapac women can be abusers too. the cycle of abuse is very real.

@gthktty 666A woman can never do anything wrong.  Whatever wrong  a woman  does appear to have done  can actually only be the fault of a man who abuses that little innocent and loving creature.

@みかんの木だお ???

@みかんの木だお ???

yeah i honestly doubt it since she was in a DV situation. u never know if it was her abuser's idea to cover his own ass or just her idea to cover her abuser's ass... because as the victim u want to fix things so u don't get abused again... so she could have called the cops immediately after the assault + went back on her word because in her mind she loves her abuser n wants to protect him..  which by extension is also protecting herself from harm because he'd be less angry...

Women rarely get in trouble for falsely accusing men of crimes, usually with the excuse being that punishing them for lying could make other women afraid of accusing men themselves.


2:15 The driest sarcasm, ever heard on an American network, methinks...


Holy moly 46 grand??? Fuck yeah I’m down for 3 and a half days.


"You have a video camera that shows me? Doesn't even make sense :/"


I pressed like button for the last 17 seconds!


The armed robbery guy is the ultimate Canadian - gets wrongfully arrested, remains super chill, wants to make sure to call in to work before being held, and is thanking his detective as he's being led to lockup.

@ceg 2009 what an overall strange comment. Also, as a Canadian, people can be assholes. Stereotypes aren't necessarily always true, in this case, it was just funny and borderline absurd to see someone fit "the mold".

@nalina minus the reverse racism means minus glorification of a certain race or ethnicity i.e. Canadians (he views as a race apparently). What you referred to as a stereotype, though tbh I'm not sure why that is a stereotype for Canadians, but I have never been in Canada so... maybe they are generally very nice idk.

@ceg 2009 okay, so do you have any idea what the reverse racism comment was about?

@nalina I'm just explaining to you where the straw hat guy was coming from not the op.

@ceg 2009 it's not a "baseless glorification of Canadians", it's just a stereotype and pointing out the absurdity that the guy can still act nice while put in horrible situations -- making him fit the stereotype of the nice Canadian. It really wasn't as serious as you guys think. Also what's the reverse racism thing? Weird.

@nalina his comment is an eyeroll at the previous comments seemingly baseless glorification of Canadians. In other words he is saying that is a good person, not particularly a Canadian.

@Shinobi Firecracker "Reverse racism." Which was what exactly?

@Shinobi Firecracker where's the racism, he just said Canadian lol. You want your cookie?

i don't get whats even going on in these replies

Straw Hat never knew Canadian was a race! You Americans curriculum system works it wonders that’s for sure

As a fellow Canadian I hope ya'll have a good day eh.

@Shinobi Firecracker As a Canadian, I find your considering Canadians another race sexist, and I don't much care for it!

Straw hat? More like strawman argument, am I right?

There's A Mushroom On My Shirt Cause I'm A Failure

@Shinobi Firecracker Canadian isn't a race, you silly goose.

@Shinobi Firecracker that literally made no sense

@Sunny R i guess it's because he called him the Ultimate Canadian as if he were to imply that only Canadians can be nice, probably just an overly nationalistic american who doesn't get a joke

@Shinobi Firecracker Was this reply meant for a different comment because I'm lost? Where's the 'reverse racism'?

@Shinobi Firecracker you feeling ok buddy

I did that twice as an American. Must just make me an the ultimate citizen. Minus the reverse racism you added


…in almost every state or commonwealth doing time in county is a cakewalk…state prison is a big difference and in Louisiana it’s just fucking nutz


Isaiah 1:16-17
Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean;
    remove the evil of your deeds from before My eyes;
cease to do evil,
     learn to do good;
seek justice,
    correct oppression;
bring justice to the fatherless,
    plead the widow's cause.


Guilty or not your best bet in this Situation is to keep your Mouth shut, Detective's that already have all the Evidence they need don't ask question's. All they want is an Arrest, and could really care less about what actually happened.. If your in this Room their trying to Lock you up Period. Ask for your Attorney and STFU..


"We're looking for a short white guy" Arrests tall black guy. I'm surprised demoted and suspended without pay was all they got. Poor guy. Damn.

Demoted and suspended is a proper consequence

Demoted and suspended is a proper consequence

@Tfree free unfortunately I don’t simply have links to statistics saved in my phone ready to whip out when someone questions me about racism lol

@Tfree free a) read my other comments and get back to me. B) google is free and i encourage you to do your own research on many different sites and articles, as I can’t link all of the statistics and articles here that helped me come to my conclusion, and I don’t want your next comment to be “you cherry picked this and that statistic” doing your own research and making your own conclusions about the facts is really important, don’t just expect people in the comments to tell you everything you need to know.

@Simya Rembert By that logic, the officer could just as likely hate tall people.

@Simya Rembert By that logic, the officer could just as likely hate tall people.

@Phia If you have the links please share. It will actually be interesting to see

@Phia If you have the links please share. It will actually be interesting to see

@Phia The other guy in the video was white and he was still arrested??

@Phia The other guy in the video was white and he was still arrested??

@N BLM did nothing to help innocent folks that were wrongly accused.

@N BLM did nothing to help innocent folks that were wrongly accused.

@Phia Racism is one of the reasons the Zodiac killer wasn't caught. Apparently the police disregarded eyewitness accounts and sent a search team with the objective of black male instead white male.

I’m not surprised. They don’t get what they deserve for ruining people’s lives.

I’m not surprised. They don’t get what they deserve for ruining people’s lives.

I just wanna know: why do certain people get so offended when you point out other people’s racism? Are y’all part of the system, or complacent to the system bc you enjoy that white privilege too much to address the white supremacy, racism and oppression that upholds it? Either way I hope y’all get better soon, Fr, ignorance is a disease.

I'm not even remotely surprised. This your first time seeing this?

I'm not even remotely surprised. This your first time seeing this?

@M0rtanius the justice system doesn’t only exist in America lol, and it’s corrupt and systematically racist in many countries.
You also missed a key difference in these two cases that are glaringly different, the white man they arrested WAS the suspect they were looking for, he was falsely accused by the victim but she gave his description and name to the police. The black man was arrested by 7 officers after getting off the bus bc he was on the street they thought the criminal they were chasing came out on, even though the description of the man they were looking for was short and white and he was neither. They also treated these men extremely differently, the white man was actually offered a chance to explain himself and asked questions by the cops even with prior history in breaking and entering, the black man with no prior charges is told his guilt is not in question and that there’s so much evidence he might as well confess, and isn’t asked to tell his side of the story until the end of the interrogation. He was also held for three days with no witnesses or evidence putting him at the scene, where as the white guy did have ties to the people he had been accused by. Thats a huge error within the system vs a civilian purposely turning someone in falsely. As I said, it’s happens to black people disproportionately, and there are statistics that back me up. If you just did a shred of research you’d know that black people are killed, brutalized, falsely arrested and accused and incarcerated by police/ the justice system at a high rate when compared to their  percentage of the population.

@M0rtanius the justice system doesn’t only exist in America lol, and it’s corrupt and systematically racist in many countries.
You also missed a key difference in these two cases that are glaringly different, the white man they arrested WAS the suspect they were looking for, he was falsely accused by the victim but she gave his description and name to the police. The black man was arrested by 7 officers after getting off the bus bc he was on the street they *thought* the criminal they were chasing came out on, even though the description of the man they were looking for was short and white and he was neither. They also treated these men extremely differently, the white man was actually offered a chance to explain himself and asked questions by the cops even with prior history in breaking and entering, the black man with no prior charges is told his guilt is not in question and that there’s so much evidence he might as well confess, and isn’t asked to tell his side of the story until the end of the interrogation. He was also held for three days with no witnesses or evidence putting him at the scene, where as the white guy did have ties to the people he had been accused by. Thats a huge error within the system vs a civilian purposely turning someone in falsely. As I said, it’s happens to black people disproportionately, and there are statistics that back me up. If you just did a shred of research you’d know that black people are killed, brutalized, falsely arrested and accused and incarcerated by police/ the justice system at a high rate when compared to their  percentage of the population.

This should be bordering on false accusation crime, what the fuck.

This should be bordering on false accusation crime, what the fuck.

@arthur morgan His skin color was still dark.

@arthur morgan His skin color was still dark.

@Phia What about the white bearded guy who got falsely accused? So that doesn't ONLY happen to black people. And the detainment of the black guy happened in Canada, as you can probably tell by the accents.

@KLUSTUR They were all arrested and imprisoned.

@KLUSTUR They were all arrested and imprisoned.

Tbh, if he were white, when the cops entered the alley, he would have still been arrested. This case doesn't exactly scream racism, just cops saw a guy where they expected the suspect to be and assumed

@Paul John Jeffs you're right, the fact that the guy was black doesn't prove that him being falsely accused was racially influenced. but it's the fact that a witness had specifically told the officer that they saw a short white male, and the officer disregarded this and went for the tall black male. what else could this be?

@KLUSTUR him getting 46k in really doesn't haven't anything to do with it, he had to right to receive that money. but the money also does not take away the fact that he spent 3 days in jail, more than likely lost his job, and was publicly  humiliated, and accused without evidence.

I hate that man I just can't believe that their are people who have this job but are so close minded

@Mikko "what will you say when a white man was held without evidence?"<br>bro, someone SPECIFICALLY told the officer that they saw a short white male. he discards this statement, and goes for a tall black male. what does this look like to you?

@Mikko "what will you say when a white man was held without evidence?"
bro, someone SPECIFICALLY told the officer that they saw a short white male. he discards this statement, and goes for a tall black male. what does this look like to you?

@tutorial: brush him gotta love twitter facts.

@tutorial: brush him gotta love twitter facts.

that guy doesn't look black to me at all lmao

that guy doesn't look black to me at all lmao

I'm more surprised that there were any consequences to the detective's failures at all. Cops are caught on camera shooting unarmed men in cold blood and get off with a slap on the wrist. My guess is they were demoted based on the fact that they lost the following court battle. IE: You lost us money, so now we're mad.

@KLUSTUR Not 3 days off, but the entire process to sue on top, along with expenses.

@KLUSTUR Not 3 days off, but the entire process to sue on top, along with expenses.

There are lots of pricks in the force who probably would've wanted to promote him for that

There are lots of pricks in the force who probably would've wanted to promote him for that

@tutorial: brush him this was in Canada btw

@tutorial: brush him this was in Canada btw

@Damien Breslin Sorry about that. I just find it that when people bring up random singular anecdotes they tend to be the type that somehow believe the exception somehow refutes the rule (statistic).

@Mikko You're 100% correct. It could be due to race and it could not be due to race. The fact that the accused is black is not evidence for anything and its stupid to assume and preach that the officer is racist.  No point trying to argue with people tbh; people are stupid.

@That's Rich just one. I'm just saying that's why they wasnt fired. Dont turn it into somthing it's not kid. Where did I imply it was "across the board"?

@Damien Breslin And somehow that means straight across the board that's every case, or just one anecdote?

@Mikko because you NEVER recognize racism. Like with George Floyd, you won’t even accept that he was killed because of his skin color

I have seen a video though when a witness said it was a white man but he wasnt. He was black

@Mikko are you saying racism doesn’t exist?

@Mikko are you saying racism doesn’t exist?

@Mikko well why I say this is because you are not trying to imagine or sympathize with victims of racism

@Mikko the amount of times this kind of thing happens to black men is way out of proportion to the amount of times it happens to white people, there’s statistics showing this. Your ignorance isn’t an argument, please do some research.

@BlinQ3d Gaming and here we have another person triggered about anything to do with race. People like you tend to be the most racist people out there, because even clearly acknowledging race in this instance is somehow wrong. Did you hear the description of the actual robber (short and white) and the person they decided to just arrest with no evidence (tall and black). Even the innocent white guy, even though the victim was clearly lying they at least got her to point someone (him) out. There was literally no evidence that this guy was guilty of robbing the store, yet the detective treated him as if he were guilty before being proven innocent.

@BlinQ3d Gaming bc it is about race. The justice system is racist and this is a clear cut case of systemic racism. A white man would not be arrested if the description for the suspect was a black man. A white man would not be held without evidence for 3 days, it’s just the facts.

This is why BLM needed to happen. I don’t agree with defunding police or the looting but we all need a reminder that racism still exists everywhere

Racism exists? <b>shocked Pikachu face</b>

@Elizabeth Greene what do you mean you people?

@Elizabeth Greene what do you mean you people?

@Furkan Topaloglu obviously not, but at the end of the day, the only way he could've won more is if they got fired. We're talking about the aftermath, not what he was going through in those 3 days.

@KLUSTUR Almost getting years in jail and thinking about that for 3 days non-stop doesn't sound like a vacation to me.  The fact that he only made it out thanks to 1 police officer doing their god damn job is pretty sad to think about.

I mean, $46K for 3 days off of work doesn't sound too bad, so I wouldn't exactly say "poor guy". The detective and arresting officers definitely deserved a harsher punishment, though. Hopefully that detective's demotion was doing traffic duty like it is in the movies.

They were all arrested and imprisoned. The reason why they thought he might be the perpetrator was because they hadn’t reviewed the evidence (which they were, by law, required to do so).

At least he got some compensation out of that ordeal. But that's gotta leave you with some trust issues towards police for the rest of your life.

@Phia Don't ever let anyone convince you otherwise, by the way. Recognizing that bigotry and racial violence are inherent in our judicial system is paramount to improving it.

Anyone trying to convince you that there is no institutional racism is fucking deluded

Racism runs very deep in the justice system, I wouldn’t be surprised if this wasn’t his first time and if his colleagues and higher ups have also wrongfully incarcerated other black people. They often protect each other when they’re all doing the same crooked shit.

Right??? Like how?? They just arrest the first person they see???

Right??? Like how?? They just arrest the first person they see???

It really is so terrible... He is so composed and smart, and he was treated with so much disrespect 😥


Fuck, I'll stay 3 days in jail for 40k..


This definitely improves my way of telling if someone is lying or not. The innocent people often learn toward their accusers, the show dominant posture, they are fast in response, they tell the same stories each time they are asked and so on. The guilty are slow on response, their stories are never constant, they passify themselves constantly, they divert their eye contact away from the accusers and so on. Its interesting to see the human body work itself.

@Someone Random it really depends on what cop you're dealing with though.

@TheNuttedNutter To use it to make a confession, maybe. The only thing the cop interviewing you is trying to do is convict. They don't care if you're innocent or guilty, they just want to put you behind bars. The only way I'd reasonably have a chance of getting out of false accusations is by only asking for a lawyer.

@Someone Random well they'd take that disorder into note before interrogation you 💀

as an aspie I would definitely pass as guilty if I were tried for a crime I didn't commit just based off your description lol


Michael should have that officer's job - he's clearly a better detective ...

@ZzShy thank you for your excellent points. 😁

@Anti Aggro how is that a disgusting system if the cops who ignored the system and didn't respect the man's time were punished with demotions and no pay and they gave the dude 42k for having to deal with them breaking the rules of the system? Thats the system working, ypu punish those that break the rules and do what you can to make amends to those who were taken advantage of by dirty cops. No matter how theoretically perfect a system you construct, there will always be people who break the rules or take advantage of the system, thats just reality, and the hallmark of a good system is that, even when you get situations like this where people break those rules, you can fix them and punish/compensate those involved accordingly.

@Jonathan Mortondude if he was guilty, he wouldn't have called the bluff, it was obviously a bluff if he didn't do it...

I was soo angry until the line all investigators got demoted or got there career ruined ... Came at the end ...<br>What a disgusting system

I was soo angry until the line all investigators got demoted or got there career ruined ... Came at the end ...
What a disgusting system

Detective Constable Jason Leek.
Read more about the full case and settlement here: https://www.thespec.com/news/hamilton-region/2011/05/25/judge-rakes-cops-over-the-coals-for-wrongful-arrest.html

Seriously, if nothing else, Michael is incredibly intelligent. He read motive with ease, and kept his head in a very consequential situation. I hope his boss saw that, and was able to acknowledge how lucky they are to have him.

He called the bluff of the video camera immediately.


this is why you never talk to the police. ANYTHING YOU SAY CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU. Innocent until proven guilty has never been the way it actually works and you will always be considered guilty untill you're able to prove your own innocence.


this belongs on a top ten most satisfying endings video


tbh this 17 minutes of seeing criminals sitting on the chair and chatting is way better than indian CIDs breaking doors after doors XDDDDDDDDDDDD