Mohammad is a good man. His actions saved this guy's life

Mohammad is a good man. His actions saved this guy's life

@Kamal Sagar I heard he died, but was it really murder?

@Kamal Sagar I heard he died, but was it really murder?

She went to him to hire a hitman. That means he has the right contacts to do so. He did the right thing that day, but that doesn't mean he's a good man.

@Lewis Luna Yeah I thought the same! Like how can she be so dumb to trust her ex for such work?

@sponish0 No, this man could have done LESS, and that is simply ignore Dalia's request in hiring a hitman and moving on with his life. So, putting time and effort (including getting involved in what could've been a murder) in informing the authorities is actually worth giving credit for, specially when your ex girlfriend is a sociopath who is capable of doing anything without regret. So yes, this is worth giving credit for.

☆кυωαιтι - єαgℓє☆

u really think he is a good man when his ex gf went to him to get a hitman...

u really think he is a good man when his ex gf went to him to get a hitman...

What are the odds she could actually find a real hit man though? I mean, I have some pretty shady contacts from my partying days, but I've never met a hit man. The first person she asked turned her in, and even the dude from Pirate Bay went to prison for trying to contract a hit from some feds claiming to be hells angels. I think it's almost always a cop.

It would've been better to scam her out of the money and then tell the boys at the station what was going on.

@T Why do you think that people are butthurt? Being able to emphasize with those who you don't agree with is an important part of communication.

Well, it seems like Matthew Hopkins stripped away his comments in fear of being cancelled by the moderate, non-confrontational community here in this thread, so unless he comes back, we probably won't have anything to work off of.

Not to be annoying, but I repeat:
Being able to delete your comments is kinda stupid in situations like these. I'm personally just going to take screenshots of threads, because I don't think that YT would care about making a change on this. Maybe by providing links to google docs with context, it could fix the discussion process.

Edit: I fixed a grammar mistake that I found after posting.

Edit: If you got 5 minutes, here's the link to something that I have been working on for a while. Don't be afraid to give me feedback. Thank you.

Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JEqVL8swHosIVMD59hsnV4SoV9I7jGmVR8599WFWu3Y/edit?usp=sharing

@Milan Nesic why cause his names Mohammed you sado

@Milan Nesic why cause his names Mohammed you sado

@Lewis Luna or he thought getting another man murdered is just wrong.

@Lewis Luna or he thought getting another man murdered is just wrong.

Ight I just jumped into this thread just to see all the context getting stripped out. I think the ability to remove your own comments is just bad in cases like these.

He's also muslim because his name is Mohammad.

He's also muslim because his name is Mohammad.

@brandon perez It's important because that's how you get taken advantage of. That should be the moral of this story. In the same way that Michael Dippolito was manipulated, so can you, and that starts by not thinking rationally about people. This begins at home, with your wife, it extends to your friends, relatives, and so on, up to what things you choose to buy, who you do business with, and which politicians you elect. It matters a lot.

@DivergentF I am glad to have been understood. Many years ago, a person whom I knew remotely, and who I later discovered to be a thief, gave many names of people to the police indicating them as "accomplices" or "buyers of stolen goods" because this would help him to get a discount on his sentence (there was a secret agreement between him and the police). Unfortunately he also mentioned my name. Fortunately, he pointed out so many other unsuspected people (mixed with real accomplices) that the judges realized that he was not credible. In this case, an apparently good action was judged as bad, because the motive of the person (the thief) was only to have a personal benefit.

@GarielBee I have to agree with that. Intentions do matter in law and I shouldn't have defended the idea that he is a good person based on his actions alone. Pretty stupid to assumed that he was being implied as a bad person as well.

In the law, the concept of Intention is fundamental. In establishing a penalty for a crime, one does not simply assess a person's action, but also the Intention of the person performing the action. We can use the same method not to evaluate a crime, but a good action.  This is rational, and to say it is wrong means being naive and not wanting to see evil, which unfortunately exists.

Hypotesis 1: M. acted out of a sense of inner justice. Hypotesis 2: M. he acted out of fear of earthly justice.

Since "we know nothing" about M, hypotheses 1 or 2 have the same probability.

In my opinion, M. did the right thing, it's a good thing he exists, we know this, I hope everyone agrees, and we can read it in thousands of other comments. Should we therefore continue with his pontification, or can we elaborate more veiled hypotheses?
Being used to questioning good, as well as evil, is important.
Many people tend to exaggerate the opinion they have of others, and divide them into "good or bad". I believe that this is a biased attitude dictated by emotions.
And it is dangerous for society. These people, in fact, often think they have the sure answer in their judgment of others. And I would never want them to be judges.

This shouldn't even be debated on. Not knowing the intentions shouldn't affect how this guy is viewed at all. The fact that you guys are so hard bent on why he did it rather than him doing it is actually questionable. Mohammad did the right thing, it might just seem typical for a human being, but SURPRISE-SURPRISE, shitty people do exist too and wouldn't do what he did just because they don't want to get involved, that's not just a prison thing, people wouldn't want to "snitch" for the most shitty reasons. Everyone agreeing with Matthew is going based off on "what ifs", but not even with the most flimsy evidence to back them up,  since there is no evidence of his intentions,  you can't just focus on what-ifs when in the end, Mohammad's choice was the reason the investigation on her was even started. What makes you people actually shitty is how you make Mohammad out to be a bad person. You don't know his intentions, but you definitely don't know what type of person he is to only focus on the worst of him. And him being her previous boyfriend wouldn't even be enough evidence to start a crappy conspiracy.

tl;dr, focusing on what his intentions were rather than his action is fucking stupid because you don't know shit about him and there isn't anything to gain out of that knowledge, to begin with.

@Matthew Hopkins Yeah you may be right. I don't know in US, but in Italy there's a law that sounds like "omitted crime report". In practice, if you are aware of a crime but do not report it, you are liable to prosecution. It is possible that Mohammad thought it possible that she would post her name as a list of people she tried to contact, after being found guilty of incitement to murder, in case she was found out.

@Kat Alexander sure but I don't know how far your fantastical bromance goes (i.e. no homo)

I wanna see these two dudes have a life long long bromance.

I wanna see these two dudes have a life long long bromance.

@Matthew Hopkins  the racism comment was teasing the people that think muhammed was so great for behaving like a normal person should.

Also, I agreed with your points so was mocking people that were not getting it.  "Low IQ magnet" was meant to say you attracted dumb replies.  (Maybe I was one of them, but I was not against you 😉)

@Matthew Hopkins  Even if his intentions were good, he did what 99% of people in a civilized country would do if asked to put a hit on someone.  So his actions are mundane and not particularly commendable.   I'm starting to fear there are a lot of racists in this comment section that have low standards for someone named muhammed.  (Reminds me of a certain Chris Rock skit about [n-werds])

@Matthew Hopkins  doesn't matter. his actions saved a mans life and he did the right thing, regardless of why. end of.

@Matthew Hopkins Well, we certainly had fun over-thinking this, didn't we?

@Matthew Hopkins Well, we certainly had fun over-thinking this, didn't we?

Matthew Hopkins im not reading that bro but keep up the good work

Matthew Hopkins im not reading that bro but keep up the good work

I agree with @Matthew Hopkins on this, without knowing why he told the police we can't really praise him as a good man. I mean, based on who Dalia was as person he could have been doing it simply because he hated dealing with her and its hard to blame him for that based on who she is, but that would not make him a good man if that was his motivation. What we can say is if he had not done what he had then the husband Mike would be dead and this evil woman would be free to harm others. However, to state that intent doesn't matter as long as the action is good is a very narrow way to look at things. We have many people throughout history and today that do something that is good but for selfish reasons that completely nullify the good actions. Why you do something is just as important as asking what you did.

MrVhatever that analogy doesn’t work at all, Mohammad wasn’t reporting something for himself, he did for another person...

That's like reporting someone rbeaking into your neighbors house to the police. It doesn't make you a "good person", it's make you not an asshole/bad person.

This is true ! We need more people reporting when someone asks them if they know hit men!!!

@Matthew Hopkins your point flew over their heads but you're right.

@Matthew Hopkins your point flew over their heads but you're right.

Matthew Hopkins it’s embarrassing to read your comments sir

Matthew Hopkins it’s embarrassing to read your comments sir

@Matthew Hopkins another thing is- what made her think to go to this guy to find a hit man? Does he know shady figures? If so, how & why? Etc etc.

 So yea, we don't really know for sure. We do know we're glad he did what he did.

Mohammad is also shady. Why she chose to contact HIM for that? He probably has connections with that business. He is shady

Amen. Plus he got to serve some serious revenge to an ex.

Amen. Plus he got to serve some serious revenge to an ex.

Tactical Bacon because he did what he was expected to do, I’m not gonna give a guy huge credit fir doing something he’s supposed to do. Not be involved in a murder. It’s not like he even had any reason to get involved with it

I don’t get why we are giving this guy so much credit for doing what any man would be expected to do? Yeah he’s a good man for not arranging a guys killing

@Matthew Hopkins Gee, that was an important point... whether the guy who saved a man's life was really a good man.  Keep up the good work, Matt, arguing unimportant details that no one cares about.  You'll go far in life.  Oh, and if you're wondering why you don't get invited to any parties....

I don't think any of them where good people

I don't think any of them where good people

Mohammad was her ex he probably already had experience dealing with her and knew how she trampled people this was sweet revenge for him. I'd do the same

@Matthew Hopkins why does it matter to you the specifics on wether or not if he's a good man. Who honestly cares this much? He's a good man IN THIS INSTANCE for his actions in regards to saving someone's life (regardless of the motive).  Look we can all move on now :)

@Matthew Hopkins statements dont really equal to fact. Why you mad that someone thinks of the guy as a great man(bc he is regardless of motive)?<br>I can accept your 'wE dOnT kNoW HiS mOtIvE' if everyone is forcing it down your throat.  but no one is saying it as a fact they're saying it as an opinion. They're saying what theyre seeing and feeling. Not facts but feelings.

@Matthew Hopkins statements dont really equal to fact. Why you mad that someone thinks of the guy as a great man(bc he is regardless of motive)?
I can accept your 'wE dOnT kNoW HiS mOtIvE' if everyone is forcing it down your throat.  but no one is saying it as a fact they're saying it as an opinion. They're saying what theyre seeing and feeling. Not facts but feelings.

ray croal of course he wouldn’t these closet racists only care about his name.

ray croal of course he wouldn’t these closet racists only care about his name.

@Matthew Hopkins oh shut up matthew, i am beginning to think you wouldn't have questioned any statement if his name was michael

@Matthew Hopkins he saved a man's life. You can argue moral absolutes all you want but he took evidence of an assassination plot to the police and got the conspirator taken to justice.

@Matthew Hopkins He's a good man for his actions. No matter the motivation, he did the right thing.


Investigator : “your husband is well and alive”
Her : “thank god”
Couldn’t stop laughing at this

@yuta town She is used to getting what she wants by sheer will of word. This situation must be very confusing for her.

it was also funny when she kept telling the cops “i wanna go home” after they told her she’s going to jail LMAOOO

At least she could act better and tried to be shocked xD but nah, just was -_-

@DeathnoteBB I dunno, those are a lot of big words for her. I'd be surprised if she ever actually understood them

@IWantThe’80’sBack Which is weird cause the cop or detective told her she was arrested for solicitation of first degree murder

Probably thought they’d drop all charges against her and she could go free.

What she was really thinking: dammit!!! 😡🤬😰


HAHAHAHAHAHA..........she was hoping her husband would be killed and that day she is locked up :)  so awesome


Oh that fake crying, so bad. She started screaming before he was even done telling her

Right? Like I would think if that really happened it would take a few minutes at least for it to sink in before somwould get hysterical

@Great Horned Owl right? That was some great acting 🤣🤣🤣👍👌

@Donja Aboukhezaima Not someone who wasn't expecting the death.... most people would have been in deep shock and would have questions, lots and lots of it...

I actually found it pretty convincing. If I didn't know any better I would think it was 100% real. But everyone reacts to horrible news differently, so I would have a hard time believing any negative response (crying/ anger/shock) was suspicious.

“I’m sorry, your husband-”

“AHHHH NOOOOOOO”

Yaboigotmoney She clearly did not feel remorse.

Donja Aboukhezaima Yeah, it’s not so much the fact that she reacted before he was done talking, it’s the way she went from 0-60 with the crying.

oooCupcake11 Lol there’s no way that would’ve been convincing,

but to keep on fake crying for more than 5 min is a sore to my soul already. She's quite a talented con.

@Genny Zelis I don't know how they could keep their serious or not glance at each other... I guess I'm not cut to be a cop 😂

And that tall cop in the background was just looking at her while she was play crying and freaking out.

If we didn’t know what we know I think it could’ve been convincing. All those cop cars at the house, she could’ve expected the worst! Lol

The Oscar for Best Actress in Murder for Hire goes to

OMG i would believe her even tho if i was the officer xDDDD lol

I couldn’t help but laugh, the fact the hysterical crying was for nothing and everyone around her knew 😩


If you thought that was good check out @pattymayo

Yes but it makes you NOT want to visit Florida 😂😂

No that intro is just 1 day in Florida
Welcome to my home state
Florida
We have crack and bath salts

I was not expecting the intro considering the last two cases I watched were very serious and disturbing lol

Legit came here to see if anyone else thought so


is it just me or does she look alot like bella poarch