This drama makes everybody look terrible. Those who believed Dogpack are gonna get slandered for being stupid and gullible, those who didn't are gonna be, and have already been, slandered for being a 'Mr Beast dickrider'. Leaves a very bad taste in my mouth. Watching slop is fun but it's nice finally seeing an unbiased opinion.

Also unrelated but I don't think Rosanna is in the wrong in this situation, just very gullible and doesn't look into things too deeply. Esp when I saw the Higehiro slander, that set off a few alarm bells

I had no stakes in this when the dogpack video dropped, could feel something was off and either way the videos after talking about mundane unserious and unimportant allegations gave away that Dogpack was disingenuous at best and malicious at worse.

I’m surprised anyone took his words at face value.

I never believed Dogpack for a second, Honestly was sick how easily the Internet turned on Mr Beast, But what can ya do? It's the Internet, A soulless land filled with degenerates a-holes >.>

i think that rosanna might have had tinted glasses on due to her dislike of mr. beast/jimmy that stemmed from the editing of that creator hide n' seek video and the backlash gained from it. it's understandable since she felt maligned and i think, had she remained more focused on the squid games' allegations that were being sent to her from contestants, it would have been the better avenue to explore.

i think the second she began to veer into the dogpack stuff though without her or her team doing their own due diligence, then using suspected cp as a thumbnail in her video while claiming to alert the fbi without doing any kind of research prior --- was where her glasses became a full blindfold. i don't believe she was gullible as much as she was biased, which happens. it's just sad that what legitimate grievances she held, will likely fall under higher scrutiny more than before.

@@macnkeebs Yeah, it's definitely very biased from her, there was so much wrong with what dogpack showed and said in the video. Honestly, to me it kinda felt like rosanna weddle and dogpack were a group of teen girls shit talking behind someone's back if you know what I mean xD. Like there was some substance behind it, but it was built on poor ground

@@Joshuamiller19570 I think a lot of it stems from the ideology that 'all rich people are a-holes', which is kinda fair in and of itself. Nobody actually needs more than 20m, and even that's a stretch. <br>But MrBeast didn't really do himself any favors either by staying silent, because silence basically means an admission of guilt. And also with the moldy lunchly going on, with his co-founders just making fun of a very serious problem, nobody was going to be on his side anyway

@@Joshuamiller19570 I think a lot of it stems from the ideology that 'all rich people are a-holes', which is kinda fair in and of itself. Nobody actually needs more than 20m, and even that's a stretch.
But MrBeast didn't really do himself any favors either by staying silent, because silence basically means an admission of guilt. And also with the moldy lunchly going on, with his co-founders just making fun of a very serious problem, nobody was going to be on his side anyway

I watched some parts of dogpack's videos, but I didn't care because I'm not into Mrbeast. This is why I don't trust everything without hearing from multiple sides and forming my own opinion.

This guy seems to feel how I feel. Respect to you.

@@carln5690 i agree. even the framing of it felt different than her coverage on the squid games' allegations, where it wasn't highly produced or edited or filled with a brightness about it. it was simply her going over what was sent to her. whereas her time with dogpack felt very much like a gab session between two friends for tea --- where the topic of the day was suspected crimes that felt fbi-worthy. optics sadly do matter in things like these. as much as we wish we were evolved enough as a species to think they don't, they still do and that video was not a good look from start to finish.

Nah.  Rosanna is clearly a spiteful mean girl who did not care if the allegations were false as long as she got to cause Mr. Beast reputational harm.  That’s not being gullible and stupid.  There’s plenty of blame to share with her too.

@@SS-xr7jf being gullible can come from bias, which i think most can agree that there was a clear bias she holds. as far as spiteful and mean, much like this video states, two things can be true at the same time. one can be so blinded by their own bias, that they lean into it so much, they skip due diligence, become negligent themselves, and use their anger at being maligned in harmful, spiteful ways.

i for one, have no dog in this fight other than wishing the actual victims were able to have been heard and seen without the additional circus show that was brought with it.

@@macnkeebs   there’s a point where your bias is no longer manifesting as gullibility, though.  And she either thought it was ok to have barely edited csam in a thumbnail, or knew it was fake and accused them of it anyways.  If you get to that point, any plausible deniability she might have had went straight out the window.  Because neither stupidity, nor gullibility can explain that sort of gross negligence.  So she is, in fact, also in the wrong.

@@SS-xr7jf you know what? agreed! i like to believe most have good intention, bad execution, but when it's something as serious as that --- so much so that you're @'ing the fbi rather than filling out an actual report, it does cross from plausible deniability to being maliciously negligent. it becomes even more egregious when, rather than focusing on the use of it in the thumbnail, you focus on the color changes of your background for a/b testing. so yeah, i get where you're coming from and have to agree.

They were stupid and gullible though. I was saying the whole time. Where does he back up his claims? He never showed any hard evidence

Why did i initially read the end as "Hiroshima slander"😭

I think the video she made with dogpack about the “work chat” could have been done a lot better considering her younger viewer base


Hiring someone without doing backgrounds checks is a mistake, keeping him on staff and letting him wear as mask after finding out is the sinsister deliberate part.

don't expect a 19 year old starting a business to expect bestbuy didn't do background checks and do them himself, also note that delaware most definitely just asked for a mask and maybe gave an excuse like "I don't want to be in the camera" or something like that and jimmy just said "yeah sure", some people are like that and making the assumptions that someone is a pedo because they want to wear a mask is idiotic

@gewnurb  I'm going to steal your shoes and crease them

@gewnurb  he was told and kept him on staff

@@gewnurbPoor, innocent, 19 year old Jimmy.

I like how Beasty boy is allowed to be negligent, but people want to crucify DogPack for being negligent.

Hypocritical much?

they literally knew about Delaware's past...

@@hammer3721 One is trying to slander another person for revenge. While Jimmy unkowingly hired someone without making background checks and then fired them

@DajuSar  Boo hoo, poor PDF getting exposed.

@@hammer3721 lol dogpack wasn't being negligent, that's straight up manipulation lmao

@@madadaff2880 still salty for being fired 😂

There is 0 evidence that Mr Beast found out they were a RSO and kept them around. Stop believing known liars at their word and nothing else.

@@hammer3721 I don't think anyone its feeling sad because the RSO got exposed and fired tho

@@hammer3721Jimmy was negligent in hiring Delaware because he was just starting his company and only kept him on for like a year.

Dog Pack INTENTIONALLY left out context of evidence to try and vilify Jimmy any chance he got. Ur actually so dumb.

@@hammer3721Jimmy was being negligent while Dogpack was straight up manipulative. That's the difference.

@@gewnurb Don't tell me you didn't know what SA and PDs were when you were 19? It's still his fault for not doing a background check. I guaranty that you blame bestbuy for not checking.

@@johnnylittle9299 You trust corps with anything? You wanna give me your social and where you live?

@johnnylittle9299  are you trying to imply the registry is fake?

@@hammer3721 Right and he just dismisses Jake the Viking's tweet as "he's untrustworthy" without any justification

@@cheesemanthe2nd no I’m saying that Best Buy probably should’ve done a better background check too especially Mrbeast was just a rising YouTuber at the time and Best Buy is a huge brand

@@BrettCooper-b6u jake the viking was going around saying jimmy knew while downplaying what delaware did, he is untrustworthy

@@hammer3721 holy shit you must  be a cam nuggets enjoyer lmao my bad

That is wrong info from Dogpack. Delaware only wears a mask in one video and in the other videos you can see his face. Delaware was called Delaware because of his work-uniform having the name Delaware. Also, Jimmy was way smaller at the time and didn´t do background checks. Is it negligent yes, did jimmy know about Delaware before hiring him, no.

@madadaff2880  Poor Stucky nihilist. ;'(

@madadaff2880  Poor Stucky nihilist. ;'(

@@hammer3721uh oh, someone is seeing evidence contradicting something they’ve whole sale swallowed and are now coping hard

@@hammer3721 bro are you on the spectrum? Cause you seem to lack any balls or a critical thinking brain if you're actually using 'Womp Womp'

@@johnnylittle9299 I know a Geek Squad manager that explained that they run an involuntary background check every 6 month. But he also said that when he was a Best Buy manager, he never did a background check. Maybe it's an implied thing for some companies? I know when I was hired at FedEx, they ran a background check in every state.

@@hammer3721dog pack was knowingly malicious big difference

@@BrettCooper-b6ujake isn't trustworthy cause he hates trans people. Happy?


My god thank you man. It was getting pretty irritating seeing video after video of content creators being so impressed with Dogpack's "evidence". This video is quite the satisfying b!tch slap to DogPack and all the content creators that amplified such unauthenticated claims to millions of their viewers with zero regard for responsibility.


I think it's time for this to go off the internet and be handled by law enforcement and an actual court. All this reporting for YouTube is just muddying the waters of the case and could jeopardize it.

What case is there to have? It's not really illegal stuff, just drama

@@norhe. Plenty of the things mentioned are illegal. The Ava situation is its own illegal can of worms. Also defamation. Mr. Beast can easily sue Dogpack and a bunch of other things.


In 1 month, Dogpack has gone from vigilante, to questionable, to downright untrustworthy.

Dogpack has always been untrustworthy, people just were way too quick to believe him blindly cuz he rode the wave of uncertainty around Mr beast after the Kris Tyson stuff

@leontriestoart i agree, there was something just off about him releasing all of this information right at the peak of the Ava Kris Tyson drama

@@leontriestoart Well he is untrustworthy but still not a piece of * like Mr Fraud

Not really dogpack has been considered a clown since like August

@@erikshields3724 He wasnt, because even in his first video he got things right and wrong. People ignored his questionable stuff and agreed on his facts.

I never trusted him. If he had "gud intenshions", he would have made this video wayyyy before getting fired. All the AI shit does not help. Smug ass attitude at moments doesn't help either.

@@leontriestoart honestly, he was trustworthy at first only because many were too lazy to do research and at the time there was a lack of counter arguments

dude the thing is he just open the pandora box, you cant deny aloot of allegations and missbeheviour about the videos, both  jimmy and dogpack are pice of shit, specially jimmy he know exactly what he is doing, he is smart and i dont think he dont know exactly what he is doing, the assosation with 2 pice of shit for luncly, criptoscams, market manipulation, even luncly lie in the nutrition labbel for the amount of some sustance it have, even the investagations says nothing about aloot of allegation mrbeast as company have, like the other dude who work for mrbeast comapany say one ceo was giving aderal edit videos until late night, more and more people come to confirm some allegation

Imagine defending a guy who willingly defended kris tyson, a literal pedo.

@@Ceratisa Mr Beast being a scammer and fraud. He is shady af aside of dog packs lies. Even Coffeezilla confirmed it, the most respected journalist in the internet.


Waiting for the truth about Soggy Cereal video now. Gotta keep this recursion going.

Already come out—his flight was probably paid for by Mr. Beast, the YouTube account commented on this video right away and then deleted, and Mr. Beast has been asking drama channels to promote this video. Video is propaganda and unusable. If someone wanted to use any of the claims made here ethically they’d have to start from scratch and verify it themselves.


I love how quickly everyone turned on Jimmy, turned on Dogpack, then turned back to Jimmy, then turned on both.


This is one of the most important videos on YouTube. You're insane Soggy!

I respect the journalism here, I love both your channel and soggy cereals channel.  This is beautifully put together.

Can’t wait to see the million dollar lawyer legal maneuvers coming up in the beast game trials!

Didn’t you make that commentary slop video that sucked? I’m sure that’s you lol

@@lizzieisbaked he did, I think Lerix spoke about how bad it was too.

Nah, he's just yet another one DogPack hater


Dog pack is either going to ignore this video or he is just going to say nuh uh to everything. Edit:Guys please stop blowing up my notifications just like or dislike it please

Or he could make up more lies but I hope he responds

@@lovelylipbonesouwwwwwwwolv2198 since everyone was looking for any reason to hate mr east and then dogpack comes out with all these “accusations” a lot of people won’t listen to our cereal overlord

@@TheRealestHooman So... is MrBeast THAT great in bed, huh? 🤔

@@azurezzz The difference is that one guy is too big to fall, and the other is not big enough to fall.

10 new videos with dogpack on a white background with words relating to downfall in bold white and red

The best move for dogpack is to ignore everything until MrBeast makes a small mistake and then go all out milking that mistake until everyone start siding with him again after a few months just like how MrBeast did it

@@PiyeFUNKOT What if he tries to defend his allegations and goes on Twitter/X to disprove Soggy, just like he did with Nicholas?

@@hellboy9458 I think the internet will clown him and few people is gonna help him defend against the so many supporters of MrBeast, MrBeast currently has the high ground.

Hed be a hypocrite using the mrbeast strat but dogpack has everything to lose and mrbeast…all the kids dont care

He did respond by saying "Mr beast threw soggy cereal under the bus"

I believe that dogpack will actually answer to this. Pulling a MrBeast would be just dumb and make them look even worse.

DogPack has addressed all accusations gracefully. So he will come out clean out of this slander. At the end of the day, ratio doesn't lie

@@aleksandrmaksimov2818 i doubt he make it out fine tbh.

He’ll do that, he’s that, he’s gonna bla bla bla… How about you all just stop making assumptions, which is caused all of this shit in the first place, or are you all that dumb and blindly believe all that dog, cereal and other people says online for clout 🤡

@aleksandrmaksimov2818  really let me guess barely doing a video on it providing no evidence because guess what that's the exact same things did the trying justify accusing it innocent man of sexual abuse

I am commenting to blow up your notifications 😊

@@TheRealestHoomanmr beast is still guilty 😂😂😂

I will continue blowing your notifications, you corportate shill.

No dog pack is just gonna say that this YouTuber graped a kid or something. Or more realistically,”he attacked and killed the queen of England. How do I know… JUST TRUST BRO.”

Why not just turn off reply notifications?

I am commenting this just because you said not to comment

Imagine defending a guy who willingly defended kris tyson, a literal pedo.

He already disabled his comments on his YT channel

@@IBZogTheGreat @droketheroper  in one of the comments already typed that

@ no, because I stand by what I said and I’m not gonna delete it just because it occasionally inconveniences me


Here's another clip out of context:<br>In his now deleted video about MrBeast's CEO, DogPack shows a clip of MrBeast saying "I don't get along with women" and then CUTS the clip right away to make it look misogynistic. The original context was about dating and MrBeast said "I don't get along with women who don't have a hobby."

Here's another clip out of context:
In his now deleted video about MrBeast's CEO, DogPack shows a clip of MrBeast saying "I don't get along with women" and then CUTS the clip right away to make it look misogynistic. The original context was about dating and MrBeast said "I don't get along with women who don't have a hobby."

Bro if not getting alone with women is not acceptable then I'm a criminal for sure ☠

@@cybanix6905
Where are you going after you die?

What happens next? Have you ever thought about that?

Repent today and give your life to Jesus Christ to obtain eternal salvation. Tomorrow may be too late my brethen😢.

Hebrews 9:27 says "And as it is appointed unto man once to die, but after that the judgement

@@sophiemoconnell in the FLAGRANT podcast

@@FabioGeometryDash Oh, the MrBeast dating preferences. I think he still got backlash just because he shared his type of woman to everyone and then immediately got labeled as a misogynist, right?.

@@imu1st you can search a clip on YT I think "MrBeast dating preferences" or "MrBeast CANCELLED For Dating Preferences"


This is no doubt part of mr beasts PR campaign. While he may be right, he is probably being payed by mr beast for this video which would make 100% sense.

I would also worry about some comments. With a person who has so much money, mr beast, it would be a no brainer to not pay people to write positive comments that made him look good. Sure there are people who defend him. But the length some of the comments go, replying to everything and absolutely glazing feels off.

Take everyone with a grain of salt. Even me, but mainly people who have the most to lose and the most to gain.

yeah absolutely, soggy has a bias against dogpack and mr beast clearly paid him, and he doesn't really disprove anything that dogpack said. Also the positive comments are from gullible children who can't think for themselves


can't wait for the "The Truth About Soggy Cereal, Dogpack404, and MrBeast" video to come out 😤😤😤


Hopefully months later we don't get the "The Truth about MrBeast, Dogpack404 and Soggy Cereal"


It's Nov 2024 and DogPack is still crying over being fired from Mr Beast in 2023 bc his ideas suck

just cos someone doesnt hate mrbeast doesnt mean theyre getting paid dipshit


Really respect you man, but the one thing I have to disagree with, is that leaving lights on at all times while someone is in solitary confinement is actually a war crime. It can psychologically damage you and drive you insane by messing with your circadian rhythm.

Edit: I forgot to clarify this is exclusively targeting that one point, and isn't an attempt at invalidating other arguments

All Soggy has to do, is try it himself...Add the rotting milk smell for extra effect.

@@poopypants9983 nah, I don't think torturing oneself is essential to understanding the damage it causes.


We as viewers cannot simply take your word as gospel, as you state in your opening you are doing this because you did not have a good interaction with Dogpack himself. due to this bias, we cannot take your words at face value, just as we cannot trust dogpack or the employees of Mr Beast.

"When someone is prepared to doctor evidence to make potentially incriminating lies more convincing, it automatically puts every single one of their accusations that isn't bulletproof into question." - You, Soggy Cereal.

I find it very funny that right after you show the leaked recording of a firing, you go on to later accuse Jake Weddle of being disingenuous in his showing of an AI voice recording. Everyone who has tried to defend Mr Beast or cover all topics has stated how Dogpack404, Dawson French. Only worked at Mr. Beast for 3 weeks. If he were such an unimportant and low level employee, then why was his Firing- something that is a very very sensitive legal issue, be recorded and then leaked. Not only that but you have not cited your source for this "evidence" and we don't know who it could have came from, and it could very well be AI seeing as you either haven't vetted it, or are protecting the person who recorded it from legal action dogpack could make against them.

The Delaware allegations being summed up as a dumb mistake aren't on Jimmy's fault as a 19 year old. Keeping him hired after the face, in which was confirmed by his brother was. (I am not speaking about the text to Jimmy's mom, I am talking about the tweet put out by Jake how Delaware had taken a plea deal for his sentence. If it wasn't ever true that Delaware was a sex offender then why would they run with the lie instead of denying it outright, it hurts the person they are trying to protect, Delaware, more than Jake or Jimmy.)

Bringing up how many wars are active in the world is a red herring, it draws the viewers eyes away from the actual account of the story and instead paints Jake and Dogpack as insensitive or even malicious in their description of events, by comparing it to the victims of war crimes. In this context the wars are the world are Irrelevant whether it fits your story or not.

In reality nobody who wasn't present for the entire solitary confinement challenge can dismiss James Weddle's claims that he was intentionally sleep deprived during his entire experience. We only have 1 eye witness account from the victim, if anyone were to step out and dismiss or reinforce the allegations they would be much different. A warcrime is still a warcrime even if not committed during war or by a country. Even if it was intended to be a joke, there is no proof it didn't happen at all. The comment of him not being a detainee can also be put under scrutiny because Jake was kept inside and attempted to be convinced not to leave, after he had decided 100% he was leaving and made that clear. That makes him a detainee against his will no matter how much time has passed.

 Also using the clip of Jake saying he "Alleged" it to discredit him is very suspect, seeing as all of Dogpack404's videos would be considered "Alleged" so would Coffeezilla's new video, anything from Rossana Pansino, or any of the victims of the Beast Games amazon show. It is a legality to say or it makes the process of being sued for slander and defamation 100x easier for Mr. Beast LLC.

The Accusations of Jake Weddle spreading AI voice recordings of Jimmy are Null and Void and you are taking advantage of cut context. TWO MINUTES into the video, Jake Weddle SAYS ITS AI. BLATANTLY. And to VET YOUR SOURCES and not trust this video if it gets spread around. You cannot use "My AtTeNtIoN sPaN" as a reason to condemn him, It took quite literally 6 seconds for him to say it was AI. (I measured it by going to the video and seeing how long it took, I expected like near a minute? no. 6 seconds.)

Looking at the 50k from Jake's perspective, him and Dogpack are not on some Holy Crusade. If my life was on the line and I was at risk of being sued, I too would take 50k with no strings attached. It is the smart move. No matter if he is my enemy, if it can go to my lawyer's fees when he eventually tries to sue me Id take it.

Ironic that you talk about Doctoring evidence after clipping Jake Weddle out of context in the Ai video.

Currently you have both cherry picked clips and attempted to involved Dogpack, Jake Weddle, and Rosana Pansino, which is a gross usage of guilt by association. In reality all of his detractors are separate bubbles with overlapping parts, like a circle chart. So dismissing all of their arguments as if they were a group is foolish and Fallacious, especially when you have Bias to attack Dogpack404 for calling you overdramatic.

Illegal lottery #3 I believe is actually correct, there was no wrongdoing due to how Mr. Beast advertised, but it would be wrong to say that his other arguments aren't true or are in question due to this regardless of his credibility. That is definition Argument from Fallacy, and is a misuse of scrutiny to base an argument upon.

The reddit post getting deleted was information unknown to dogpack at the time and it was likely dogpack's contacting of the Mr Beast PR team that caused this. Due to Dogpack's infrequent and lengthy uploads there is possibility he talks about this in his next video. You simply processing and publishing this evidence faster than him is not a reason to attack him for it, although it does make this accusation instead a misunderstanding.

The CGI buses and Trains comment is a Strawman argument, Dogpack argued that the WHEELS on the bus were fake, not the bus and train itself. The car however is in a difficult spot, the recoloring argument is a red herring from the digital lift which you provide no actual evidence of being false or true. You simply direct the viewers attention AWAY from the original issue. We will not know if the car was digitally lifted or not unless someone recreates the stunt again and films it all the way through.

The first rocket car has documentation by a channel called Donut of its build, but the SECOND rocket car, the one that was changed to blue, has 0 documentation or at least documentation that is now unavailable. Warped TV also didn't BUILD THE ROCKET CAR, that was done by Donut. Warped designed the ramp and the football field jump, which both videos are here:

?v=scFytaZjyPE

?v=Rri83pDN6kc

I only put the ends of the links here so my comment doesn't get deleted for advertising or some other dumb filter, put these onto your own youtube links.

Also again with the overdramatic thing, you are cementing your own Bias in the situation and acting like a child.

The problem with the leaked work chat messages is the fact that you don't disprove them and their contents. No matter what YOU believe, or the fact that the photo was proved to not be CP. Chris Ava Tyson BELIEVED IT TO BE CP. And made multiple other jokes about things of that nature which confirms INTENT. It was their INTENT to share CP and that is the allegation that matters. it is honestly in my opinion disgusting to dismiss these matters due to their contents. Dogpack IS IN THE WRONG HERE for reverse image searching it.

Just because Ava Christ Tyson made the chat for edgy nsfw memes. Does not mean that it was not a company chat. The discord had private channels for NSFW and we still condemn them for what they were, ALONG WITH the people who were in them; we do not MIX THE TWO, There were Children in these channels but they also existed ON THE OFFICIAL MR BEAST DISCORD. That is 2 sets of inappropriate conduct, the difference is 1 is a felony and the other is just horrible practices. (It also does not take a rocket scientist to differentiate the two, so do not swap them around or conflate my words in a different manner than is clearly stated.)

More on the work group chat, the opinions of the man who leaked the chat are just that, opinions. It is his opinion that they were not related to the pedophilia Ava Tyson has exhibited in present day.

Also the man who leaked the messages DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS YOUR ARGUEMENT OF IT BEING AN NSFW MEME CHAT. HE CALLS IT A WORK CHAT IN THE CLIP YOU USE!

Also false reports to the FBI can get up to 5 years in prison. I know its a joke, but dude the risks are high for a false report you call "easy". Filling out the forum is easy but when the FBI has the tools to know and find exactly where you are, that prison sentence is just around the corner.

The problem with proving jimmy didn't know is the rest of the contents of the chat and their contents, which you have been selectively picking through and throwing out this entire time. Like Ava assuming the photo of Ivanka trump was UNDERAGE and SAYING IT OUTRIGHT.

For the cancer awareness ones you should be saying allegedly, which you've joked and made points on earlier in the video. Calling Dogpack a creep straight up is not legally advisable. You don't know his intentions, and your only actual interactions with him was him calling you overdramatic.

The thing about the old man is a eyewitness vs eyewitness, but they both are claimed eyewitnesses and we have no concrete proof of falsehood. You trying to dismiss it is using the fallacy of Appealing to Emotion. In which you use emotional responses rather than factual evidence to win an argument.

The difference with the man who won 1,000,000 dollars is that it is documented by both Mr beast AND HIMSELF. He hasn't edited out the hardships he had to go through with that money, which lends him extra credibility alongside the continual videos from Mr beast.

Ironic again talking about taking clips out of context.

SO FUCKING IRONIC that you say you aren't biased when you have been talking about your interactions with dogpack this whole time, and said it was why you were ever suspicious of him in the first place.

You also cant confirm those subscribers were random. They may have seemed random to the subscribers themselves but you have no inside info to Mr Beast LLC to confirm they were selected randomly.

All of the parts in the Locoya Hill allegations section are on dogpack's wrongdoing list.

The moon Mission was also on Dogpack's wrongdoing list.

The rusty barge from the raft video was evidence that dogpack did not have access to at the time. Using it in such a way is very very disingenuous. but the other safety concerns and the timer challenge are also onto the list.

The participant of the 24 circles challenge is not Vetted at all and engages is a False Authority on the matter. IE he has dubious credentials to talk on this topic due to his nature of being non-vetted as an actual participant.

The lotteries are scummy yes. But also are not illegal like was once postured by Dogpack.

You scroll by a lot of your DMs but reading them, they are actually quite cordial? I don't know why you would even put them in if they disprove your point of him trying to slander out outright. Slow the video down to .5 or .25 to read them, they are easily readable at that speed. Timestamp: 1:03:36

I personally would have more scrutiny on the employees of Mr beast you interviewed seeing as they are still working there and under NDA. They would be considered Biased or Non-Impartial persons, and should not be taken at face value; just like how you aren't taking anything from Jake Weddle or Dogpack at face value. Not taking these things at face value is a good thing to do for both sides, but offering the privilege of belief to one side over the other is exactly how dogpack took off.

Dogpack is a scumbag. Being a scumbag does not invalidate your investigative work however. The people who exposed EDP445 were absolute scumbags, Keemstar is a major scumbag and internet leech, but he has exposed lots of people for heinous shit, Pegasus absolutely MILKED the Mr. Beast drama and has said some unscrupulous comments about people with certain views or attractions, but he has covered lots of other situations that are much less clickbait-y.

It isn't exactly uncommon for these exposers to not have the best morals or be the best people.

Anyway, Take this video with a shake of salt, I'm out.

@@doodles3114wow, u r soo intelligent and ur points r very well articulated ! i hope he sees this ^^

Wow you wrote a whole essay but pop off I guess ☠

Finally someone who ain't a fucking sheep.

I can't believe I had to scroll this much to find a person who made sense/wasn't a dick rider/automatic side changer/who knew how to use their brain.

It was obvious from the start that Soggy ain't someone you should trust fully if they're using the common fallacy of appealing to emotion technique you see so many times around, emotion is literally temporarily and the internet is forever , once emotion subsides things come out, one just has to stay patient now and wait.

Also... unless he ACTUALLY VETS HIS SOURCES AND PROVES that audio clip ain't AI, it's literally worthless evidence in this current day and age... I actually fell for it when Jake played his own audio on his video at the time before saying like 10seconds later that it was AI and I was like "Really?!?!", so him USING THIS audio as an argument/proof and right after going after Jake is... laughable man.

Mr beast is an awful human being, not the worst in the world but I didn't know it was a competition nowadays and that you're only bad when you've reach the bad-top :)

Also to you lack of attention span people out there, it's been 2days since this was posted, the video is over an hour long-- if dog pack replies which he probably will, it'll take time, a few more days probably to prepare evidence etc. WAIT for it, don't make fucking assumptions and use his "silence" as an excuse, these things take time to prepare.

There's also the fact that Soggy waited this long to make a video like this?! Like, why wasn't this "audio" used from the let go? If REAL and not AI it would've stopped things before they even got this bad-- there ain't no way on earth that Mr beast wouldn't have come out with said audio way earlier if it was true and be forced to hire crisis lawyers and retort to shitty "I investigated myself, saw nothing wrong" tactics.

Those dick riders out there lack a functioning logic brain.

Finally someone who ain't a fucking sheep.

I can't believe I had to scroll this much to find a person who made sense/wasn't a dick rider/automatic side changer/who knew how to use their brain.

It was obvious from the start that Soggy ain't someone you should trust *fully* if they're using the common fallacy of appealing to emotion technique you see *so* many times around, emotion is literally temporarily and the internet is *forever* , once emotion subsides things come out, one just has to stay patient now and wait.

Also... unless he ACTUALLY VETS HIS SOURCES AND PROVES that audio clip ain't AI, it's literally worthless evidence in this current day and age... I actually fell for it when Jake played his own audio on his video at the time before saying like 10seconds later that it was AI and I was like "Really?!?!", so him USING THIS audio as an argument/proof and right after going after Jake is... laughable man.

Mr beast is an awful human being, not the *worst* in the world but I didn't know it was a competition nowadays and that you're only bad when you've reach the bad-top :)

Also to you lack of attention span people out there, it's been 2days since this was posted, the video is over an hour long-- if dog pack replies which he probably will, it'll take time, a few more days probably to prepare evidence etc. WAIT for it, don't make fucking assumptions and use his "silence" as an excuse, these things take time to prepare.

There's also the fact that Soggy waited *this* long to make a video like this?! Like, why wasn't this "audio" used from the let go? If REAL and not *AI* it would've stopped things before they even got this bad-- there ain't no way on earth that Mr beast wouldn't have come out with said audio way earlier if it was true and be forced to hire crisis lawyers and retort to shitty "I investigated myself, saw nothing wrong" tactics.

Those dick riders out there lack a functioning logic brain.

Thank you, I didn't have the time or effort to put alot of the things hes saying into words, or go as in depth with how you just did, i got halfway through before going "So when are you scrutinizing all of the stuff about mr beast, chris's stuff, what chris did, and the videos of the. Forging and obvious cgi.." because it sounded like he did alot of the same stuff he accused dogpack of, cut videos, had a video of dogpack asking for a 2nd chance, didn't show evidence, then showed an AI video about jake weddle. Like, if that's ai, why can't the other about dogpack be AI? And jake literally said it's ai less than a minute in, if he's worried about "attention span" he would've made his intention more clear and be less disingenuous because he hasn't stopped riding mr beast for over 45 minutes (first half so far.)

We 100% can't trust dogpack now, but with how dogpack is and jake weddle is, jake and rosanna still seem really credible to reveal all the lies. Mr beast is still in the wrong

Haven’t read the entire thing yet but u seem very smart u should make ur own video I’ll support u

finally im shocked that no one has pointed out things you said i think you should make a video you seem a smart guy


what I’ve learned in the past few months is that I just believe anything I watch…

Too bad, no one’s going to believe this and will say MrBeast paid off his ex-employee to help Soggy expose Dogpack. Or they’re just Glazers/Dickriders. Get the authorities, whose word I only trust. something like that

Be more critical, plus the dog pack thing was mostly supported by the general community so I don’t blame you

so its basically sheep following sheep@@Annymausd

@@Annymausd  While I admit that I too was a sheep in this regard, I don't agree with blaming the audience, as it's not as simple as everyone blindly jumping on a bandwagon. Dogpack presented himself as a trustworthy source (he actually was an employee), had a plethora of "insider information" (believable due to his prior identity as an employee + NDA stuff), and even brought on an unfortunate victim to help solidify his credibility (Weedle may have lied(?) about the warcrime joke, but he definitely was traumatized by the experience + was already doxxed and such, as stated in the video).<br>Honestly, the only reason the situation was exposed so thoroughly was due to Dogpack's slip-up via the Ivanka picture. That, on top of his poor/hostile treatment towards Soggy, caused Soggy himself to actually look more into the situation, shattering Dogpack's image as a reliable figure.

@@Annymausd  While I admit that I too was a sheep in this regard, I don't agree with blaming the audience, as it's not as simple as everyone blindly jumping on a bandwagon. Dogpack presented himself as a trustworthy source (he actually was an employee), had a plethora of "insider information" (believable due to his prior identity as an employee + NDA stuff), and even brought on an unfortunate victim to help solidify his credibility (Weedle may have lied(?) about the warcrime joke, but he definitely was traumatized by the experience + was already doxxed and such, as stated in the video).
Honestly, the only reason the situation was exposed so thoroughly was due to Dogpack's slip-up via the Ivanka picture. That, on top of his poor/hostile treatment towards Soggy, caused Soggy himself to actually look more into the situation, shattering Dogpack's image as a reliable figure.

@@AFrisbeeLadno, "sheep following" is blindly trusting a source solely based on public opinion. I can't deny that a lot of dogpacks supporters were sheeps, however a good majority leaned on his perspective because of the evidence he provided and the lack of response from MrBeast. I was also a supported of dogpack before this video so please look at this with the mindset that there may be bias haha.
DogPack at first provided reasonable evidence and irrefutable claims with the gambling (most of it), those that would try to refute it would be seen as a strong unreliable defender of the corporate man. Once someone establishes a platform, it's hard to look pass was they're saying after that (obvious with MrBeast). I also believe that no one could really look at Jake Weddle with a critical eye considering his story was based off trauma and personal experiences.
I also was more keen to trust the skinny dog because he worked at the company, many also established trust due to this. I think its a tricky situation and we can't blame most of dogpacks defenders (excluding onlyPegasus, I got giant beef with him), however I will admit that the more recent allegations are just wack and should have been looked into deeper by the public. More of a shame considering that Mrbeast couldn't really defend himself and the main narrative of the situation was "underdog vs money hungry cooperation".

It’s better to just leave this drama behind bc like 1 month time and someone debunking this shit 😭😭😭


Reminder that Soggy Cereal is not suicidal

Get this comment to the same amount of likes he got on the DogPack video (140k or so just so you don't have to go give him more views.)

@Humfreeee  It's practically the same comment and that other one is like the top comment on that video or something, but I'm kinda impressed that I remembered that comment even existed in the first place.


I cant believe people are still defending dogpack. It’s easier to fool someone than convince them they’ve been fooled.


The worst crime to come out of this situation, is Jake Weddle’s “jokes”.

God the first time i found out about Dogpack was bc of youtube recommending Jake Weddle's video. I'm glad to know people found him incredibly irritating and  unfunny

Me too thay guy sucks and is unfunny. I hate my wife and love commenting on soggy waffles  content

@@JakeWeddle How long did it take you to write that one?

@@JakeWeddle  holy shit its the guy its actually the guy what the fuck

@@JakeWeddle omg hey Jake (i like your comedy btw, just wanna say that)

@@JakeWeddlewho is "my wife" and why do u hate him?

jokes aside hope ur doing alright now

@@JakeWeddle : ... who is your wife.  I start to get irritated by that. you always say you hate her.  how does she pick this up? poor sod.    (it took me a while to understand the comment was written by the comedian himself,  you.  I had to read it three times,  or more,  I do not want to lie, god forbid.  lol.    or... you here must actually be a bot..🤔 never in the world do you hate your wife.  that is a test sentence,  as  in  "find all the wifes on that picture,  or find all the cars in that picture". 🤔☺

@@JakeWeddle
> video calling me a liar and a fraud: i sleep
>a comment calling me unfunny: REAL SHIT?!!

@@JakeWeddleGet tf off this comment section man, cuz clearly this is not ur best work. Ur friend in this video who stayed friends with u is a real one, get a beer with him irl or sth. Cmon.

Mr Beast pumping and dumping crypto and making 31 million is probably the worst

@@nelkfullsend I would put it along Rosanna publishing what she thought is cp for clicks

@@JakeWeddle Jake I honestly want to say something real quick. I get what it's like to feel depressed. And then to suddenly find people you can relate to and that take you in no matter your problems. But you're falling in with the wrong crowd. Dogpack is very manipulative and will drop you the moment you're no longer useful to him. I've known people like that in my own life.
And it might also be a good idea to stay off the internet for a while. To get your mental health back together. Comedy is a great outlet but if you share that stuff with others, not everyone will react positively.

And don't be afraid about not having friends. Hearing the way Dustin spoke about you, I'm 100% sure he can be a good person to latch onto whilst you figure stuff out. You're a social person, you can get along with everyone. And whilst not everyone can get along with you, you've got good people lined up ready to let you into their lives.

Honestly, I kinda thought you were complicit in all this stuff but I sympathize with you. Because I've been where you are right now, years ago. Fell in with bad people that used me for their own gain. But I escaped from that and got an amazing social circle now. You can do the same bud. I know you can.

@@JakeWeddle

Are you going to cry on Instagram again? I hope you put your money from the DogPack saga to uses outside of entertainment

@@JakeWeddle wtf is that jake the weddle

@@JakeWeddlebro chose to join the challenge after you left your job yourself, made hundreds thousands dollars (that would take people years to make), in like a couple of days while literally failing the challenge, and still crying about it is crazy

@@JakeWeddle I don't care if dogpack is shady, you still underwent mistreatment by Jimmy. I'm very glad you've recovered and I'm also glad you helped blow the whistle about how ethically dubious this whole content style is

@@tenrudy the liar was dogpack. The allegations of him being treated bad is STILL true even if he consented to it because that’s exploiting people desperation for content

@@arielperez3613 i agree with you completely, i just thought it's funny Jake saw this video and decided he's just gonna reply to this comment and nothing else

@@arielperez3613 I would literally sh00t myself for the amount of money that Jake got. Mistreated my ass.


Dogpack404: "I am gonna shit on MrBeast. My proof is 95% witness testimonies which cannot be irrefutably prove or disproven."

Soggy Cereal: "I am gonna shit on Dogpack404. My proof is 95% witness testimonies which cannot be irrefutably prove or disproven."

(yea ik this was already commented by someone but I found it really funny because its so true)

Yeah this whole situation is a bloodbath

Exactly!
People like to believe they are freethinkers (me included, I'm not special than anyone else) yet go with the flow of the most popular belief even though there isn't any real proof.
Like people be saying stuff like "Aha, I knew Dogpack was always so fishy", even though they THEMSELVES were on his Side!
Same goes for people who always thought Mrbeast was fishy!
Sure, we may have seen some odd signs...but ain't no way you predicted the situation to go like this...(not trying to say all people, but most of us)

Nah, dogpack404 obviously manipulated evidence so nothing he says is trustworthy

@@harrygardner7257yeah it's an entire sonic wave

The difference is dogpack has never identified his sources at all, it could literally just be dogpack pretending to be 6 anonymous sources instead of actual people. Whereas soggy talked face to face with actual identifiable people. Kind of a big difference.

@@j-money6543 dogpack404 also isn't trustworthy

@@j-money6543 Yeah but if Dogpack said who the sources were, they could get fired or sued, while Soggy interviewed current employees who were not anonymous, showing that the Mr Beast company gave clearance. So, in my opinion, both of them are kinda sketchy

@bananadog152  thats only assuming dogpack is telling the truth. It seems like anyone could tell dogpack anything negative and he publicly states it without ever confirming if its true which is insane and he's been caught multiple times now. Soggy at least brings receipts and made sure to find sources to prove whether something is real or not testimonies aside.

@@j-money6543 Yeah, that's why I say DogPack is sketchy. And I'm not talking about receipts, Soggy is definitely right about those, but due to the interviews, I feel like maybe the Mr. Beast company influenced the video a bit.

@bananadog152  but what soggy was asking them had nothing to do with Mrbeast company, it was just about dogpack and ex-employees. Mrbeast can't force them to not talk about it, it was totally optional and people want to talk about their experience since only one side of the story has been heard

@j-money6543  What I'm saying is that the company needs to give its ok for the interviews so maybe they influenced what they said so that it would fit their agenda, I'm not saying it's the case, I'm just saying it's a possibility and I don't 100% trust either side


at this point i think everyone works for Pegasus, for him to make more money


the amount of insane primary reporting you've done on your channel is really REALLY impressive

@@The3ditor_ as i said i am the real tyler the creator okokokok lalalala

Minecraft community is here (oh yeah it's controversy stuff) checks out


So glad I've actually stuck with your content for like a year now. Glad it was someone who actually researches their stuff. I didn't want to click on another "MrBeast Situation is Crazy" video. But this one adds to the conversation and actually adds perspective, motives, and some newfound information. Rather than the "Rich Youtuber (who fired me) Bad" thing that we keep seeing from DogPack. Like yeah, getting large amounts of money is hard to do morally. But not every little thing MrBeast does is going to be moral. Not justifying the alleged Crypto scams or questionably moral things that MrBeast does though. (Like filming people in poor situations for clout, marketing unhealthy food to kids, etc.)

There's investigative journalism and then there's commentary. Commentary is when someone makes a video commenting about their thoughts and opinions about a given situation based on the information provided to them whether it be true or false. Investigative Journalism is actually investigating the situation, putting all the evidence and new information together and providing those findings to the public. If you are trying to get newfound information from a commentary channel, you're not going to get it because that's not their job. I'd say this video has a mix of both, He's investigating the whole situation to get new information, providing his findings while also sharing his thoughts and opinions about it.

An investigative journalist shouldn't show any bias in their work and only provide the facts. They are supposed to be trustworthy. Unfortunately, some journalists do let their bias control their work and that can lead to spreading misinformation to the public.


But why is mrbeast deleting comments on his videos and did not respond im not trying to defend dogpack but i just want to know the truth

he got paid by mrbeast to make this lol.


There are actually some allegations that i would love to see addressed as well that weren't here! (Yes i know he said he doesn't remember all of them but i hope they are)

Like the "building a hospital from scratch video" where dogpack claims they only installed solar panels and manipulated the video with CGI

The allegations that TeamSeas didn't actually contribute to reducing pollution

Was the MrBeast games actually a terribly negligent and unprepared event or something more sinister (and what about the people who participated and sued the company for it)

Why they were deleting comments and videos and SNIPPING content from past videos if they weren't actually guilty

What about the "stranded in a cave" video where it's shown that they just went through an attraction and were never in real danger

And also, the 100 wells video where you don't know if they did make 100 wells or not, and why some pictures can be seen as reused

All in all, this video makes me feel sad. If the allegations can be so easily disproven as this video has, why hasn't the company simply addressed them already and has been hiding for 3 months in silence?

I think both dogpack and mrbeast are horrible people (according to the new crypto allegations) and i believe the drama is unfortunately just gonna keep spiraling and people will be milking it regardless...

This video was mainly in opposition of DogPack's claims in his videos rather than in defense of MrBeast, which is probably why that those points weren't addressed

And yeah, I'd agree that deleting comments and not responding sooner wasn't the greatest idea. Maybe it was because of the internal investigation, but that's just me.

@@AmazingMarioPlushFilms I completely agree that the video is only opposing dogpack claims, but dogpack DID talk about the 100 wells, the cave, the hospital and teamseas, which is why i do want to see what the response to that is

And I'm also making this comment because this guy seems to be doing a better job than the actual company on debunking lmao, so i'm maybe being a bit hopeful that he goes further and interviews more people from the company, as he was clearly able to do so


This is LITERALLY why a group of young adults under the age 30 can't run a huge media, food & marketing agency. You need to have the stuffy executives in suits to ensure rules/laws are being held. There was a reason Michael Scott hated Toby (in the office); because he was ensuring managers can't just do ANYTHING without consequence.

Yet people will call you a mrbeast apologist for saying this isnt completely Jimmy's fault and he isnt somehow a "bad" person because of thus

@pheonix2700  That's the pros & cons of being the head honcho. You make the rules, set the atmosphere & stand to make the most but at the same time take all the responsibility, blame & can lose the most too.


Did MrBeast delete his comment on this video??

I can’t find it anymore but I have it screenshotted

@@pot3543 direct quote “Finally! A video that doesn't spread baseless slander about me lol”

he liked the video

@@jonathanjohnson4594plus he also follows Soggy on Twitter/X

Yeah, I’ve been looking for his comment aswell…

Doesn’t MrBeast follow soggy on X now?
Seems weird how MrBeast started to follow soggy before this video got released…

Also, as informative as this video was, soggy missed out so many other dogpack points. Like the cgi of a hospital building on the philanthropy video.
Also, all the big YouTubers he gets to feature in videos who are just “random”, like the guy who won the chocolate factory video.

This video seemed more of an attack on dogpack , rather than actually finding facts that MrBeast is a fraud.

And no, I’m not defending dogpack.
I think this whole situation is beyond boring now and absolutely pointless.
Mrbeast is never going to own up to his mistakes, nor will his reputation get tarnished. He is absolutely loving all these videos about him, because it keeps him in the spotlight, so people are rushing to his videos when he uploads.

@@TheJOEsenOnehe also didnt mention the beast games and team sea things too

@@ermtosis exactly. Personally feel like soggy completely sold out on this video.
Especially seeing as he interviewed CURRENT MrBeast employees and they would have NEEDED permission from Mrbeast to do the interview.
He also flew to North Carolina… why could he have just done the interviews via Skype or some sort of video call? Chances are, where he did the interviews were probably in the beast studios.

@@TheJOEsenOneHe did say that this video was focused on  showing dogpacks lies and not defending mrbeast, he also said that he might have missed some allegations

I found his Comment in DingoBroLug video "MrBeast Is Innocent"

nah it sunk down probably due to hella dislikes


It’s not sponsored. Dogpack direct messaged him at the beginning of the video. Also he doesn’t fully defend Jimmy he includes some true claims that Dawson made. Don’t be delusional


so DOGPACK and MRBEAST both are evil ? never would've guessed

I wouldn't call me beast Evil imo , But Dogpack definitely falls in to that category for me cause of how many Lies he spread and Using " allegedly"" as a Get out of Jail free card for everything

@@chinyang1200In Coffeezilla’s video, he exposed Mr. Beast being part of Crypto scams, so he is evil alongside Dogpack.

It was poorly informed sarcasm, that’s what it was


This is so funny to see you use "his" tactics against him

Not even using "tactics" he's just spitting facts 😭😭

Is no one gonna call out Soggy for being completely wrong about feastables?<br>I thought everyone here with Soggy is exposing the truth while the others are complete liars??

Is no one gonna call out Soggy for being completely wrong about feastables?
I thought everyone here with Soggy is exposing the truth while the others are complete liars??

@@zonatedspore97acamasyou've copy pasted this comment quite a bit, can you tell me what was he wrong about?

@@leontriestoart its just a spam account I doubt this guy is older than 10 judging his quantity over quality of "point"

You mean accusations with a source called "trust me bro"?
55:50 No evidence at all, also the timelapse in the video is the whole night, not an "hour"

56:50 No evidence Jeremy T. Grant participated in the "24 people in the circle challenge" at all
And the final part of interviewing the MrB employees, who are literally on a payroll and have a reason to say anything to preserve their image, is just laughable. After months of damage control in MrB team, out of all possible people, he interviews an HR employee, the least trustworthy person in any company, right after the lawyers... And I really hoped this video would actually be objective for once.

@@leontriestoart had all the clues but still failed to spot the troll. i pray for your internet endeavors

Even if I give you the benifit of the doubt , there are still several double digit instances where dog pack was intentionally trying to paint Mr beast in a bad light due to his personal resentment towards him , I don't wanna insult someone or Anything man but if you actually believe that dogpack is the "good guy' idk what to say.<br>Both , mr beast AND dogpack are not trustworthy.

Even if I give you the benifit of the doubt , there are still several double digit instances where dog pack was intentionally trying to paint Mr beast in a bad light due to his personal resentment towards him , I don't wanna insult someone or Anything man but if you actually believe that dogpack is the "good guy' idk what to say.
Both , mr beast AND dogpack are not trustworthy.

@@vennadore This entire comment is cope.

it is not his tactics. Soggy is playing with honor.

@@vennadore
You're making two statements that aren't even talking about evidence, like wtf you talking about?
> What timelapse are you talking about? The point was that people isn't always being random challengers isn't a bad thing, and its understandable to take certain safety percautions
> Having a fullblown interview with the guy is a much bigger evidence than what Dogpack brought. You can also just look up when the video was uploaded
> "Interview being paid off by Mr Beast" he reviews far, FAR more employees than Dawson, with actual work experience there. All dogpack interviewed was some sociopathic employee with the mental strength of a 4 year old child that cries after being called ugly by his friends
> Calling famous top lawyer such as Quinn Emanuel and Sullivan "non trustworthy" is insane. Is some internet detective who proven to falsely accuse the wrong guy of domestic abuse more reliable and trustworthy to you?

@naganut9718  you're talking about stuff I haven't said at all. Learn to argue.

@@user-lq3jw3ov8z holy shit you guys are just as ignorant as DPs fans.

@@vennadore > said that certain time stamps that none of it is evidence despite the fact what he's saying at that time wasn't about evidence yet
> saying that an interview with the person that has been through the situation isn't evidence (how much more do you want and do you have evidence to disclaim his points)
> saying that HR and Lawyers are the least trustworthy source, despiite the fact the lawyers he hired are top lawyers with high credibility, and that he also interviewed many different employees that have far more work experience there than dogpack
> "you're talking about stuff I haven't said at all, learn to argue"
What did you talk about then?

@@Callum0814nah I think what they meant was that soggy cereal did his calcs wrong. 43 grams of hersheys is 220 calories and if you calculate 43 grams of feastables(360 total calories divided by 60 grams is 6 calories per gram, so 43x6) you get 258 which is not as high as dogoack stated but still more than a hersheys bar<br>Edit : He said that he recalculated both to 43 grams but the calories and sugar shown in the vid is for 35 grams

@@Callum0814nah I think what they meant was that soggy cereal did his calcs wrong. 43 grams of hersheys is 220 calories and if you calculate 43 grams of feastables(360 total calories divided by 60 grams is 6 calories per gram, so 43x6) you get 258 which is not as high as dogoack stated but still more than a hersheys bar
Edit : He said that he recalculated both to 43 grams but the calories and sugar shown in the vid is for 35 grams

@@anshismad4092 he is still spamming it under every comment and also soggy corrects that dogpack ignores serving size and ontop of that the feastable bar does have less calories and sugar (source:nutritionix)

@@Callum0814 Yeah it does but that's per serving size not per gram, nobody actually eats chocolate as per <br>serving size

@@Callum0814 Yeah it does but that's per serving size not per gram, nobody actually eats chocolate as per
serving size

@@anshismad4092 serving size is what is MEANT to be eaten, people who do diets and also people who care about their health follow serving sizes and just because you dont follow serving sizes(which you definitely do and have) doesnt mean others will

@@Callum0814 isn't it unfair to compare 2 serving sizes on calories and sugar if they are different amounts?<br>Thats like comparing 1 glass of milk to 2 sips of coke and saying that coke is better for you(obviously exaggerating here but you get the point)

@@Callum0814 isn't it unfair to compare 2 serving sizes on calories and sugar if they are different amounts?
Thats like comparing 1 glass of milk to 2 sips of coke and saying that coke is better for you(obviously exaggerating here but you get the point)

@@Callum0814 The judgement dogpack made was unfair . Imagine if I compare a 140g Hershey's bar to a 42g Feastables bar and call Hershey's unhealthy .<br>Clearly you haven't studied maths if you believe that the above comparison is fair.

@@Callum0814 The judgement dogpack made was unfair . Imagine if I compare a 140g Hershey's bar to a 42g Feastables bar and call Hershey's unhealthy .
Clearly you haven't studied maths if you believe that the above comparison is fair.

@@YeeHeee this isnt a maths problem its real world, comparing the weight of products that compete for the same position in their respective position in the market is stupid as they are filling the same positions you just eat less of one compared to the other and if you cant deal with having to eat a little less the fact 1 has less calories per serving shouldn't matter to you in the first place.

@@anshismad4092 Milk and coke is not comparable in anyway, milk is (usually) a healthy drink and coke isnt. We are comparing two already unhealthy things here, serving size is how much you should be eating, we see this kind of comparison all the time and its a subtle tatic used by a lot of "healthier" option products but you dont complain becuase it isnt pointed out, or made by a figure that people want to find a reason to hate.

@@anshismad4092 feastables are healthier you cant say otherwise you talk about per gram but in the real world we are comparing two standard size bars so you cant talk about per gram, its a 8g difference between the bars with Hershey's being larger and you are being deceitful to people to claim that per gram healthiness matters here as it doesnt as Feastables IS sold as 1 serving size bars which COMPETE with Hershey's 1 serving size bars  too compare the feastables "king" size bar is stupid as the difference is way bigger in size meaning that the" king" size bar clearly isnt competing against Hershey's standard size its competing against Hershey's version of "king" size bars. Dogpacks claim is not valid and neither is yours.  if you simply used your brain and hands that god has given you, you could of done one google search and looked at two websites and 5 minutes of reading! You would be able to see my point and that I am right. (sources: https://feastables.com/products/milk-chocolate, https://www.hersheyland.com/products/hersheys-milk-chocolate-candy-bars-9-3-oz-6-pack.html)

@Callum0814   I get what you are saying  but you also need to consider the marketing Mr.Beast is doing . If the Feastables bar had actually turned out to be more junkier then the Hershey's bar , then Hershey's would have a valid reason to sue Mr.Beast for misinformation and slander.

I would trust Mr Beast then Dogbreath404 @@mad3ub_

Why did you put “his” in quotation marks?

@@vennadore The focus in this video is on Dogpack's massive slander. The more quantity (accusations) = the more low to high quality varies in addressing all accusations rightfully and evidentially. It is now clear that Dogpack404 is lying, but it is also clear that not everyone is perfect and not everyone knows all the right ways of addressing and what all are considered objective to justify an allegation.


Can't wait for slop drama channels to take soggy's side as soon as they sense new content that can be milked


Mr. Beast assuming I would watch an hour and a half long video to change my opinion of him was just another grave misstep in a series of unfortunate mistakes. His continued silence speaks volumes and if he had wanted to win back viewers, he should have just addressed them himself. At this point I cannot even give him 10 minutes of my time, let alone an hour and a half. The damage is done and unfortunately I feel it is the end Jimmy. I’m truly sorry.


so glad i stuck around instead of assuming you were going to support mrbeast

Bro there is nohting wrong with supporting mr beast holy

@saltycritic  i like mr beast and the world isn't so black and white. Not everyone is great including you. Let's just stop the witch hunt and enjoy watching mr beast spend his money

@@bailfire2741 thats on you but some people aint like that

@@Juiceboxlmao Yea most people enjoy getting other people to burn, but if that was you I dont think you would be so happy having your name dragged into the mud. Like this stuff is stupid. He did stupid stuff, he made some mistakes, and he also tries to fix them. Thats what we should measure people by is the sincerity of their actions and their attempts to fix their mistakes. Not just endless lashback and brainless thought.

@@bailfire2741Sorry bro I have no interest in supporting someone who glazes Logan Paul and Elon Musk.

@homoaspien  oh my gosh so what they don't align with your political affiliations... he doesn't align with mine... but that doesn't matter. I don't need to agree on everything to like or respect a person. We all have our standing and stuff and that shouldn't determine how we view someone solely

@ Political beliefs are a reflection of one’s morals. Additionally MrBeast has sold himself as a good person who stands for the environment, trans rights, helping the homeless, and providing healthcare. He shouldn’t be so buddy buddy with people who endorsed Trump and are very publicly transphobic. Even though Ava is awful, I feel bad for her that she had to put up with Jimmy tolerating transphobic outsiders like Musk and Paul on a day to day basis.

@@homoaspien Dude its just people. You can stand for rights and still be friends with people who believe other stuff. I dont like trump, yet I have a friend who likes trump and is a very good human being. They just see the world differently and so do I. Does that mean I should stop being friends? No! It just means we believe different stuff and thats okay!

@@bailfire2741you can’t be older than 15

@@bailfire2741 mr beast is working with scammers. Logan paul and ksi has done lots of scamming in crypto currency

@@homoaspien No, political beliefs are not a reflection of someone's morals. Saying they are is decisive and leads to shouting matches where both people on each side think of themselves as a saint and all others as a devil. Sometimes literally.

One person says "I would like if 'candidate A' won and fixed the economy through 'proposition A'."
The other says "I would like if 'candidate B' won and fixed the economy through 'proposition B'."

If both of them believe that a political stance is a moral reflection, then that instantly makes them believe the other is bad and actively wants to hurt people. They both fail to realize that they are both saying "I would like if the economy was fixed."

Literally everyone in the whole world is shouting that in unison. There is not a single group of people (other than the vicious elite, which couldn't even pass a state rep if they all voted together) that wants the economy to crumble and fail, and for people to be hurting. Any examples I can think of for people who actively want the economy to fail are fringe and outliers that get painted as the representatives of the "other side".

Yes, even the people you are thinking of right now.

@@homoaspienTrump is objectively a better president, he may be a bad person doesn’t mean he’s not a good leader

@@homoaspien I don't really associate political beliefs with people's morals or how they really are as a person. It honestly just ruins relationships (lovers or family) just because they voted a politician they hate

Yeeeaaahhh I’m not making friends with a Trump supporter, and because of my position as someone who is a minority and cares about women, I’d rather avoid conservative drama and stick to my ‘echo chamber’ and community so I don’t risk my life trying to reach out to the other side.

@@bailfire2741his chocolate company uses child and slave labor i personally think liking a guy like that is wrong

@@bailfire2741 MrBeast is still a monster. At least, he's guilty of gross negligence to the extreme

@officialmonarchmusic  a monster? Wtf u guys are seriously retarded

@@bailfire2741but you would be a fake friend tho wouldn’t you? If you have trans friend but still are buddy buddy with a transphobe, that says something about you. That you don’t really care about said trans friend if you’re being cool with a person that actively despises them. That like still being cool with a person that talk shit about your friend, that’s some snake like behavior.

@@ghastlypompano2but that depends tho, like you said some will vote for a person because of economic issues but some do also vote because they share that politicians moral position and ideology. Like there are people that voted for trump for his stance against trans and minorities and you can’t blame those groups of people for not wanting to associate with those voters.

@bubbachildsupport4535  my aunt is gay and guess what! She is friends with people who hate gays. They still absolutely appreciate each other and they have their difference of opinion. Not everything needs to be devisive, not everything needs to be a them vs us type deal.

@@bailfire2741 yeah no i'd rather not support someone who aligns with logan paul of all people, its weird how you think its normal

@bubbachildsupport4535  but to blanket statement is wrong. All rectangles are squares, but not all squares are rectangles. That in my opinion is the main divide in politics.

@@bailfire2741 idk where my reply went so: i would normally agree with your statement but the example you used is so bad. if you hate gays, you are ABSOLUTELY "them" to me. thats like hating someone for being straight, or being ugly, or being a man. They are either choosing to be hateful and using their religion as an excuse, or refusing to learn and grow with the world. Which is totally their choice, but also they can;t blame anyone for not wanting to associate with their outdated, hateful ideals. dafuq?

@lieutenantfunk  cause you can still connect with people and see the good in them? You are choosing hate like they are

@@bailfire2741 why would i want to connect with someone like that though? they obviously don't appreciate human life and I find that to be a irreconcilable difference in philosophy

@@homoaspienout of all messed up things he did and what you care the most is him being friend with transphobes? fuck that you are grossing me out rn

@@bubbachildsupport4535 eh, hate the sin not the sinner. i can be friends with a racist and still not share their views, instead constantly wish for them to change

@@bailfire2741I personally would not want to be friends with someone who hates me because of traits I have no control over


How Soggy Cereal destroyed Dogpack404 -Internet Anarchist 2024

aka that one dude who abondoned his shitty tf2 channel

@@HourglassBen You didn't know? Everyone knows he is Wamo.

He'll find a way to shoe horn Charlie in there also.

No no no it’ll be “How Charlie destroyed Dogpack404”

On top of that. Nick deorio. Watched this on stream right away & praised soggy.

@alyaly2355  his previous channel. He tried to cancel zesty Jesus (a tf2 youtuber) but got canceled himself. Afterwards he quit the tf2 scene and is now internet anarchist. Ppl like him are leeches ngl, waiting for the downfall of others and profiting off of them.

@@normalperson7 Finally someone understands. Internet Anarchist is discount Sunnyv2 except he leaves his sh*t opinions in his videos. His tf2 videos were generic af.

@@pieynot9084 also the mosikritikal glazing

Internet Anarchist is Wamo. He also made a loa dog false allegations about TheTekkitRealm

@@VisualAuditoryHillucinationsOf What is a wamo?

@@normalperson7 yeah lol the dude purposely elevated some niche drama between me and a friend of mine that no one cared about just so he could make a video on it.

The drama in question is that he promoted a video of mine on his community tab, I’m literally not even joking.

@ WAMO was his old channel. He lied about people except that time, it backfired.

@@rosemulet he made a load of false allegations against thetekkitrealm.

@@rosemulet I'm a little perplexed. Can you explain what happened?

@@JohnOnChans he had an old channel which he tried creating drama on and tried canceling someone for no reason, I think, except it backfired in him

He also made a bunch of false allegations about YouTubers, for example, thetekkitrealm


this whole thing has taught me i need to not take sides immediately 💀 i was so ready for the takedown of mrbeast that i believed every word dogpack said. interesting to look inside why exactly i did that lol

Or just don't wait to be told what to think. Think critically. It was always obvious there was more to DogPack because of his weird behaviour and tenuous claims, so not every content creator jumped on the bandwagon for precisely those reasons (such as Ludwig, who got torn to shreds for it).
I don't think the lesson is not to take sides and wait for something like this. I think what you should take to heart is to use your own brain and not someone else's.

What you're implying is that if this video and others like it didn't come along and tell you what to think, then you wouldn't have changed your mind from what you were told to think earlier. That's not good. Think for yourself.

Or just don't wait to be _told_ what to think. Think critically. It was always obvious there was more to DogPack because of his weird behaviour and tenuous claims, so _not_ every content creator jumped on the bandwagon for precisely those reasons (such as Ludwig, who got torn to shreds for it).
I don't think the lesson is not to take sides and wait for something like this. I think what you should take to heart is to use your own brain and not someone else's.

What you're implying is that if _this_ video and others like it didn't come along and tell you what to think, then you wouldn't have changed your mind from what you were told to think earlier. That's not good. Think for yourself.

@@ccaagg dogpack was a red flag for me when he kept saying "allegedly" or he had info he couldnt reveal but "trust me bro". Like we were just supposed to believe his claims without evidence. 😂

I think all the youtubers that reported on the situation exposed just how lazy your favourite creators actually are. Everyone I saw did little to no research to verify the claims in his videos and instead just put Dogpacks allegations into different words followed with a 'damn this is crazy'. Hopefully this is a sign for people to stop trusting youtubers. You yourself will always be your most reliable source and youtubers don't care to try and be fair and give both sides a chance almost all of the time because they don't view themselves as journalists, only as drama channels which should be held to the same standard anyway. Even the youtubers that were calling out Mr beast years before Dogpack made this mistake. There are so many other allegations against him that actually have shit to back it up but they don't care about doing good only getting your attention and maybe another subscriber.

@@GatorHungry Exactly. Youtubers act like journalists without assuming any of the responsibilities. Do not trust lazy slop creators.

i didnt pick sides when i saw dogpack argue with such disinginious arguments like saying that he manipulated his audience by saying like for a cookie. Just felt like all he wanted to do is bring down mr beast

You got to admit, that was some good propaganda

First time? I learned that while back with the entire dream pdf allegations.

OR, hear me out, use your damn brain and don't trust a guy that uses "allegedly" every 3 sentences?

im getting cooked in these replies and rightfully so, i know im gullible 😭something to work on i guess!!!

@@96jenniekim its okay you admitted to it when you didnt need to anyways lol

@@GatorHungry everyone wished 'positive' things that they want to do were easy to distribute for everyone but unfortunately no. Once you are influential, there are many things to consider and have towards what you want to show the viewers (without ill intentions) so it remains fair for everyone, but one or multiple unknown mishap that is consider unacceptable and everyone will judge your actions. Depending how you act on a mishap you were unaware and how much you're unawareness of those situation, almost everyone or majority won't accept you anymore if you act in a wrong way.

So you instantly believe soggy cereal?
...
First believe mr beast, then dogpack, and now soggy cereal...
Remember that soggy cereal might also be lying

Then don't start taking sides immediately now, either.
This video is cherry-picked and manipulative. Dogpack is a bad journalist sure, but Mr. Beast is a terrible person. And this guy, Soggy, is also terrible.

Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.


I just don't get why Jake the Viking, who really has no reason to lie about this particular thing would say that the RSO sat down with not just MrBeast but his mother and admit to being an RSO before being hired and/or fired. He would be more reliable to believe about that than either Dogpack, MrBeast or yourself. I truly think he did know, so I think that point causes you to lose a bit of credibility. The rest makes sense, I just don't get why Jake would say that if it weren't true.

Probably to protect family and throw Mr beast Under the bus by making it look like Mr beast knowingly hired a Criminal and following along the dogpack video


thank you for debunking everything thoroughly WITH actual evidence 😭🙏 dogpack's stories and allegations were honestly super fishy and im glad my suspicions are now confirmed

Too bad, no one’s going to believe this and will say MrBeast paid off his ex-employee to help Soggy expose Dogpack. Or they’re just Glazers/Dickriders. Get the authorities, whose word I only trust. something like that

Edit: also they will likely use the Crypto scam allegation to back them up

I dont know whats going on. The only things i know are, Mr Fraud is a Scammer like Logan Paul and that wont change

I agree, most of his stuff is just exaggerated nonsense, but there are still factors that are true, like the most recent crypto drama mr beast has been exposed for

@ crypto allegation is done separately from Dogpack allegations, thanks god. But this is about a scummy fraud who trick people for clout.

He's cooked now, idk whether Rosanna is gonna get dragged into the situation too, but I i think the best move for Dogpack is to ignore everything until MrBeast makes a small mistake and then go all out milking that mistake until everyone starts siding with him again just like how MrBeast handled it

this is why I love soggy, so much research and effort goes into his videos.

As a guy who watch mr beast video I knew who was spitting lies half the time.

Ever since dogpack's third video, I've recognized his bad journalism, but in my opinion, the few things that were still proven true are enough to still condemn MrBeast. This isn't his exoneration. He still sucks

I'm not gonna play the "I always knew it!" card considering I trusted him a lot at first, but I'm surprised not a lot of people raised an eyebrow at dogpacks and Rosannas constant anti mrbeast videos. Them calling that house "ai" was literally so hilarious, it was obviously a simple editing mistake. It really shows that once you build a strong reputation; you can get away with ANYTHING.

dogpack is still right 😂😂😂😂 yall meat riders go WILD

There are a few allegations that haven’t been debunked or confirmed. But dogpacacks strategy is to throw allegations and hopes some are true

Issue: the people being interviewed are former mrbeast employees who KNOW that dogpack is getting sued. Why side against someone who can easily sue you?


Can't wait for the "How Soggy Cereal Saved MrBeast's Career" essays to come up!


I love your journalistic integrity, but I noticed at 53:05 you ignored the fact that the contestant is literally sped up when the timer is counting down normally

This, imo, is pretty undeniable proof that the video is faked

You can also see that jimmy’s movements beside the contestant are sped up too

Not to mention he missed the part where the guy touches the laser too

Yeah, timer being there in the photo doesn't really mean it was / wasn't edited in post at all.

This one is probably one of the few with some truth to it. They probably had a timer on set but either added effects to it or changed it in post.

Buddy it's sped up for like half a second, what does it even prove???


So Mr. Beast employees were sent to talk all this ish on Dog Pack and y’all are going to eat it up?


It is sad that your video, full of facts and hard effort, does not get as much views or money as the drama youtube channels that add nothing to the scene... I hope youtube wakes up and helps your channel spread the truth on a bigger scale...

Youtube kinda has incentive to keep MrBeast around, he makes them and a lot of other wealthy individuals massive amounts of money.

@@yungchimp But this video would help with that since its purpose was to disprove some of dogpack's claims.

Dw more pegasus will make a vid on this and this vid will also probably blow up


Dude, thank you so much for that deep dive. I got weird vibes by dogpack404's video, but I'm way too busy in RL to keep up with YouTube drama atm. Great video!

The plot thickens as dog pack is exposed by the soggiest cereal

@@Fusion725why do you believe him so quickly instead of staying neutral until something becomes actually concrete?

Same. The way his videos were formatted felt a bit sloppy for my taste

@@Mr.Starlight I know that Soggy goes out of his way to get information confirmed and every one  of his claims he can proof, while dogpack404 throws a lot of weird sh*t around and sees what sticks.

@@Mr.Starlight Because he already thought DogPack’s video didn’t make sense, as he just said. And this is concrete, because unlike DogPack, he uses actual evidence and isn’t making stupid claims. I noticed all these errors too before I saw the video, but I obviously didn’t make a video about it because I don’t have a channel.

@@thecatinthehat125 yeah also there are multiple videos about it

Same and it's about the election rn. It's really bad💀


almost in tears that the truth is finally coming out

Hey Stucky! THE END IS NEAR!

...hopefully.

Hey man, you're a great youtube creator :)

Hopefully all this will finally cease to continue. But knowing a certain commentary channel that ends with “sus” it’ll probably be another week or two

I'm very much expecting another video of you screaming your lungs out😭

Dog pack won’t go down without a fight I’m afraid

Yo what’s up Stucky I love your videos man

Underrated content creator right here. I remember watching the Ludwig interview video a few months back, and I’m happy to see you’re finally getting the attention you deserve

You deserve this Stucky
Thanks for countering dogpack when soggy was getting evidence

You saved about 60k people from being fooled ❤

@@jacobmurray8574 Why should he? He didn't groom kids and scammed his audience for money

Hello, glazer. Want a Mr Beast comment on your page too?

You're still the og of exposing dogshit404 .

@@aleksandrmaksimov2818
DogPack,
1. Falsely manipulated his audience by lying on the internet
2. Made false accusations against innocent ppl
3. Made ppl who has nothing to do with this drama get harassed on the internet
4. Violated his NDA
5. And what he is doing is illegal

Make sure to drink every single drop of your bf DogPack's juice lil bro

@@manuela9671this doesnt prove mrbeast is innocent


Also, just because they had a good reason to fake the raft video for safety reasons DOESN’T meant it wasn’t faked.


Ok, I’m just going to say it here. We NEED to hold YouTubers like Kavernacle, EntLaiser, MorePegasus, CamNuggets, etc further accountable for their role in spreading false information to MILLIONS of people.

@@kimkardashianruinedmylife ESPECIALLY HER. But, we all already knew that.

why does kavernacle look like idksterling tho

@@Marchers46Ignore him and don't reply to him, it's obvious he wants you to give him attention.

@@jaydenle1000 Oh, I know. But, it’s always fun to mess with people like him.

@@CamNuggetscan’t censor people here

Womp womp

@@CamNuggetswomp womp to the kid you were watching at 32:40

@@CamNuggets Bro watching a kid spread the cheeks is crazy

First I agree second your profile picture is epic

@@CamNuggets Bro be looking at under-age chocolate starfishes.

@@Tunk6no9 Thanks, some would say it’s SPLENDID.

mediocre (at the absolute best) commentary youtuber spotted@@CamNuggets

If it didn't happen to mrbeast, then it ain't happening to them either

@@CamNuggetsoh my god you’re so insecure it’s so sad lmao go wack off in your community discord you degenerate

@@CamNuggetsOh look, it's a lolcow in its natural habitat

Why kavernacle? He already had beef with mr beast before this. He used this one moment to reiterate his opinion and mentioned the Amazon Prime mrbeast show allegations.

@@DenaliGordonNick Smith would never watch kids

@@harharharharharharharharha240 Because, it seems like he hasn’t spoken about DP on his main channel. Which i think is important, given that he did use this drama to reiterate his opinion.

I remember when Kavernacle made a video about how PewDiePie spread an alt-right dogwhistle out of a 10 second clip where he mentioned "mass migration" in which he didn't even know the full context of it.

Not sure about the others but MorePegasus has literally stated that his job is just to summarize the allegations out there. Thats what hes been doing for long before this thing.

@@Marchers46you would get bitched in a debate with kavernacle lmfao, run a dialectic with him


huge respect for this video, journalistic integrity seems to disappear online when it's about someone the public doesn't like. taking allegations and running with it is way too rampant


I remember arguing with a friend about the monetization issue on dogpacks video. I made the same point about him gaining a huge amount of subscribers in such a short time. That's a HUGE opportunity on YouTube. My buddy just replied "the video isn't monetized so..."

Dogpack is more about the clout , not money . At least that's what I have noticed.

Also he has gotten himself collaborations with big YouTubers like Rosanna Pansino (because she was validly upset that she was cut out of getting second place).

The boob video idea was so funny when Dogpack brought it up to Rosanna because you just know if Mr Beast said that same thing, they would use it to point out him being weird.

@@YeeHeeeim not sure that dawson frenxh would make the video for clout considering that hes getting sued

@@YeeHeee ye it's definitely out of spite. Mr beast and dogpack are hiding something, but I don't know what.

@@LaprasSurfer  Maybe dogpack's old channel will help? As for Mr.Breast , only a professional firm can answer that.


clever how coffee avoided all these allegations and just concentrated on potential crypto ponzi scheme he just earned my trust even more

Every smart or unbiased person can clearly see what dogpack did there ,anyone could have debunked most of the claims but the hate against Mr beast was so strong defending him is an actual career suicide like soggy said, the best thing for these creators to do was wait until someone was ready to risk it all , after a couple back and forth a starting now , many commentary channels will start speaking on this, the crypto is the only strong allegation and one more ig I forgot which


Disappointing that Dawson may be a fraud too... but I still wont let my kids watch  Mr. BS content. Dude is just in it for the $$ and he just doesnt seem like a trustworthy person.

Bro quit lying you're not supervising what your kids watch on their ipads 18 hours a a day and you don't care either

@@Queef_Storm yes obviously they aren’t going to be supervising what there kids are watching 24/7 🙄 they probably just told there kids to not watch jimmy nd that’s it. always dumb commenters on the internet lmao


DogPack404 got on my nerves so much, the way he spoke just made me so pissed and suspicious<br>Sad that this happened, happy it was revealed

DogPack404 got on my nerves so much, the way he spoke just made me so pissed and suspicious
Sad that this happened, happy it was revealed

From the beginning driving through the corn field by the office he seemed like skitzo. He worked there for a couple days (3 weeks is 15 days that wild) but made it out to be a career working with Mr Beast discovering everything bad Jimbo has ever done.

Just following the crowd, taking dogpack’s word, and making an uninformed video about how Mr.Beast is “finished”: ❌❌❌<br>Creating a video disproving his claims and understanding that both parties are not great people: ✅✅✅

Just following the crowd, taking dogpack’s word, and making an uninformed video about how Mr.Beast is “finished”: ❌❌❌
Creating a video disproving his claims and understanding that both parties are not great people: ✅✅✅

Is no one gonna call out Soggy for being completely wrong about feastables?<br>I thought everyone here with Soggy is exposing the truth while the others are complete liars???

Is no one gonna call out Soggy for being completely wrong about feastables?
I thought everyone here with Soggy is exposing the truth while the others are complete liars???

@@zonatedspore97acamashmm what to call out with feastables?

Yes he lied thats shit. Mr Beast is still a horrible person. So in the end both are.

@@SolaireOfToast MrBeast is a good person in my opinion, but getting fame like that before your brain is fully developed is what screwed him up, I don't know much about DogPack so I can't say anything about why he's the way he is

@@iAtePotatoChips I mean.. the fact he was still friends with Cris before this and knew he was a creep is wild. I couldnt be a good person, being best friends with a damn creep.

Sure he was once good, but no one knows when he was corrupted. Based on what i learned, it was already before his fame exploded.

@@iAtePotatoChips Oh and he is friends with Logan Paul, the biggest Scumbag in the internet, scammer, liar and psycho. How can you be friends with that, while being good?

@@SolaireOfToastno one is really denying that,moreso about the fact that both people can be a PoS at the same time


This guy is the "Million dollar lawyer" from the memes


I implore everyone interested in this drama and this video to rewatch Dogpack’s original video. The best way to combat misinformation is to look at both sides. You will see that Soggy does not actually attack the main points or evidence that Dogpack has provided, rather he attacks Dogpack’s character to discredit and humiliate him. Soggy shows a very clear bias in his video towards Mr. Beast.

Once again I implore you to not just take this guy’s word for what he says.

@@Lego-MJClisten to Soggy’s tone and body language, he’s clearly trying to break down DogPack on a personal level

thank you bro, I've said this before and I'll say it again, soggy is literally biased against dogpack, and also he's changed the title, thumbnail and not only that but has had mrbeast comment and promote this video to other creators like DylanZitkus. Its so obvious that soggy made this video from a combination of being paid by beast and his bias against dogpack

@@TheTrueBlueOnebro is still meat riding. Hop off bro

@@Lego-MJCdon’t you think it’s a little weird that he would dm creators like Pyro to cover him being defended by Soggy? I’m not saying Dogpack isn’t in the wrong here but there’s definitely something shady going on

@ Nothing beats telling people to look for themselves to find evidence in order to come to their own conclusions to just be met with someone asking for you to tell them what they should believe

Do you have an example of a main point Dogpack had that Soggy didn't address?

@@canislupus3655 Thank you for asking politely.

For example the “War crime” thing. Soggy seems more focused on how Dustin compared the solitary confinement to a war crime as a joke rather than to actually address what was actually happening, which was Jimmy was enticing the financially struggling Weddle with lots of money  into participating in an activity that included sleeping with the light on, something that is completely illegal to do to prisoners of war.

While yes, Jimmy did not actually commit a war crime, as Weddle was not literally a prisoner of war and could leave whenever he wanted, Soggy acted that since he proved it was not a literal war crime, that he debunked the entire situation. A reminder that this war crime comment was a joke.

He also seems to insinuate that the whole “Weddle in solitary confinement” thing never actually happened despite using multiple sources that prove the complete opposite.

Another one is the Delaware thing, where Soggy brushes off Jake the Viking’s comment about how Jimmy knew he was a sex offender when hiring him, stating that Jake the Viking is not a trustworthy source (despite the fact that Jake the Viking is Delaware’s brother-in law) only for him to then use Jake the Viking as a source when using his words to confirm that Dustin was the employee who made the “war crime” joke.

Those are the first two points that Soggy talks about, in the case of the War Crime thing he does not actually address the accusation being made, and rather addresses the joke being made.

In the case of the Delaware situation he would rather talk about a rumor about Delaware’s nickname origin, rather than talk about the actual problem at hand which was that Jimmy knowingly employed a sex offender. And when Soggy does talk about it, he brushes it off and says he doesn’t believe it (without giving a reason why besides saying that Jake the Viking is untrustworthy, which he then contradicts later)

So while Soggy does indeed talk about the controversies in a very broad sense. He does so by framing it in a way that he can distract the viewer from the actual accusation being made by Dogpack.

I hope this helps, I apologize for the long comment

@@fleacosmos66  I think Soggy focused on the 'warcrimes' bit because it's honestly the most damning claim about the solitary confinement challenge. If enticing people to do things they wouldn't otherwise do with money was unethical, most people's jobs could be considered a form of slavery. Weddle willingly participated in it and could withdraw at any time.

 As far as Jake Viking's credibility is concerned,  Soggy only cites him to build a full picture along with other sources (i.e., Dustin made the warcrimes comment). Since Jake is the one making the claim that Jimmy and his Mom wanted an RSO on the team, he needs to provide evidence of that claim. Since he hasn't, and there is testimony against that being the case from Dustin, it's hard to take seriously.


Man I wish I could just be a good person and figure out when I am being lied too, this video seems far more researched than Dogpack's video, yet I still bought his video. I liked to believe I am a thoughtful person who is able to smell garbage but clearly there is no way to know for sure

this video is 100% not garbage, the video is well researched (as u mentioned) and probably doesnt have ang deceitful material

@@AFrisbeeLadUntil it isn't, unfortunately

@@AFrisbeeLadbut everyone said the same thing about dogpack

@napoopy  yeah but this time there's actual substantial evidence collected by soggy

@@AFrisbeeLadThe same can be said about dogpack's video because even this video said there was truth in dogpack's first video.


i am waiting for someone to expose soggy now

@@erikshields3724  brother its sarcasm chill out, literally who hurt you?

Im waiting for someone to expose the person who exposes the person who exposes the person who exposes the person who exposes the person who exposes the person who exposes the person who exposes soggy


y’all they can both suck. part of media literacy is understanding Dawson can be a liar and Mr. Beast can suck. we need to stop acting like because of this a guy backed by billionaires, scams children,  treats employees badly, allegedly didn’t take care of people on Mr. Beast games, and still committed a war crime didn’t do anything wrong. they’re both bad.

Dogpack is a bad journalist, Jimmy is a terrible person. Those are two very different things.<br>Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

Dogpack is a bad journalist, Jimmy is a terrible person. Those are two very different things.
Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.


Now you must be exposed for the circle of life to continue.