Ok the section of war crime joke was weak. It doesn't matter if the Justin guy was joking or not. What matters is what really happened. If Jake was forced to stay up and couldn't sleep. That was torture. Somebody joking about it being torture doesn't stop it from being torture. Jake knew it was a joke doesn't stop it from being torture either. This guy is doing exactly the same as dogpack right now. This guy too is relying on a very flimsy argument. We need solid proof of what happened, and so far, nobody has it. Not Jake, not dogpack. And also, not this guy. And whether Jake was technically allowed to leave or not is just one factor. Not letting him leave would be a very serious crime. Putting a guy in desperate needs for money in a situation where he has to choose his well-being or money is unethical and predatory. It might not be a crime but it's disgusting nevertheless

Weakest section of an otherwise sensible video. It's just nitpicking.

He could quit the moment he wanted to. But no, he wanted the money. But also he wants to be the victim

This is a fairly valid criticism of this video that I actually do agree with to an extent, I do think his main point in harping in on the warcrime joke was that that joke was being spread around as an actual allegation of MrBeast commiting a fucking warcrime which was dumb. I have some criticisms of Jake Weddle but I do legitmately believe that something bad happened to him during the production of that video I just don't think MrBeast would have offered him money as like a form of apology if that wasn't the case and I do believe Soggy should have went more in depth as to what Jake alleged when it comes down to what happened to him during the production of that video.

Like you said, we don't have solid proof of what happened. We don't know whether Jake was openly communicating how bad he was feeling or whether he was trying not to show it. We don't know Jake's financial situation outside of the challenge and how much he actually needed that money. You can either say that there was a lot of pressure from Jake to perform well and stay in the box without complaining to get money or that it was an extremely voluntary participation in which he was fully aware and ready to leave at any time but that he just wanted to go through more of the challenge to get more money for himself without voicing his concerns too openly. We just don't know. So don't make harsh judgements on people based on details you don't know.

he had the option to leave/quit at any time...

The fact that he has the option to stay and leave whenever he wants to,  dismantled your entire argument

Like many of the commenters said, we have no evidence if he was allowed to leave or not, which is likely the first.

We aren't sure if Jake was in a bad financial situation and desperate need for the money, which if true, would make the whole "challenge" more predetory since its targetting a desperate man. And we also dont know if Jake only continued because he wanted to be a victim or any other reason other then money, no matter his financial situation.

In my opinion, that section of the video is the most weakest as a part of it felt victim-blamey for me. But besides that, we always have to say that its alleged because we genuinely have no clue and maybe everyone could be lying to us.

Best to stay neutral for that part of the conversation.

You really shouldn't joke ahout something like that when you're making serious accusations to someone. Another issue is that the guy can leave at any point, and him comparing himself to grape victims do not help his case either.

Another thing is that we don't know about the financial situation off him, that includes Mr Beast. The guy should've accepted the terms going into the challenge. You also left out the fact they also would give him the money he accumulated from the amount of time he spent. He wasn't gonna just leave empty handed. There's a video by Stucky that covers him, I suggest to watch that

The guy Jake is clearly mentally unwell. The Beast should have done a mental health check on him before allowing him to participate. He's one of the most emotionally unstable people I've ever seen. Just see his Instagram posts reacting to criticism. No wonder he's (allegedly) the only one who's had that experience from similar challenges done at Mr Beast, I tend to believe that. Otherwise, for stable people, I wouldn't really care about this that much. You can just leave. It's meant to be a tough challenge for good money.


Wait so when does the truth of “Soggy Cereal” come out? By the YouTuber named “StinkyKitty478”


yeah hes a peice of shit
buts hes uncancible
he makes companys billions so they arnt gunna do anything
he could get caught grooming and still wont get cancelled

Maybe pay a little more attention in school. Even autocorrect can't do the heavy lifting for your spelling.


Can we just shut up about mr beast for 10 seconds until we see the results of all the lawsuits?

@cats9994  I dont care what the opinion is, youtubers need to shut up about it and let things air out and THEN when there's reason to believe we've seen everything we can make videos about the aftermath.

@TheRealSuperKirby  we shouldn't let Dogpack spread false information though, so that's why soggy is making the video

@@TheRealSuperKirby Dogpack started this and everything went hysterical and out of control.

@hellboy9458  no, everything with kris Tyson started this, dogpack pushed it over the edge.


Dude saw a problem and did something about it. You have to respect that. This is what the world needed 👏👏

DogPack's cooked


Mr beast has yet to respond and those accusing him are eating themselves alive.


Pity you didn't have that same feeling when you were watching Dawson's videos and eating up all his lies, even when there was no proof


Well, no matter who’s the bad person here, we can all admit this is some preem entertainment, with possiblity of prison time. All y’all grab that popcorn.


Soggy about to be approached by Youtube with "We're not some news channel but you are our best journalist"


Finally, a vid that isn't just glazing dogpack. A vid that actually explains everything with research. 😮

Love your vids, keep up the good work 😁


I don't really like MrBeast, but I found it weird when Dogpack404 talked about MrBeast's resemblances to the literal ANTICHRIST.  It felt like a pretty pointless segment, only there to villainize him even more in the eyes of the more religious audience, but I assumed it wasn't done intentionally. I still can't know absolutely what was going on through his head when making that segment, but now it feels much more scummy rather than unintentional.


Doesn't really matter if the image was of an 18 year old Ivanka Trump if Ava Chris Tyson thought it was of a 14 year old Ivanka Trump.

Soggy clearly says that. If you look he puts a tick next to the Ava allegation on the board

@@lott1e My point is, then why bring it up as a negative?

@@Lordgraysonbecause Dogpack and Rosanna have double standards

@@Lordgrayson dogpack and Rosanna put what they thought was CP barely censored on the thumbnail and also did it in the video. With their logic they are also pedophiles

@@Lordgrayson (og comment get removed so I have to change my terms)dogpack and Rosanna originally put what they thought was 'Cod Points' and barely censored it and put it on the thumbnail and and made three versions of the thumbnail with the image, and the barely censored image was also used in the video. With their logic they are also 'EDP Cupcake Eaters'

@@realdddaboss Except Ava Chris Tyson was using the image for a very different purpose, by that logic using censored CP in court as evidence would make the prosecutor a pedophile

@@Lordgrayson The problem is that no one is allowed to harbor or download CP, regardless of intent. But they did it and spread it on YouTube (which got age-restricted, as it deserved). This is why journalists aren't allowed to download any CP-related content from platforms like Pornhub.

When it comes to CP/CSAM, report it to the authorities. It's that simple to understand.

@@Lordgrayson They kinda are Ava was reporting on it too; if you read her message you can see this. (she did it a lot stupider; by not censoring it) but she was reporting (to the group chat weirdly) she was not gooning to it

@@jonathanjohnson4594 Considering all the other pedo shit we know she did and the other stuff she sent to the group chat... Yes she probably was gooning to it.
Not only that but yeah she thought it was child porn and posted it uncensored to share child porn with the group chat.
I don't know how people expected dogpack to censor the image but no matter what method he used there would have still been a point in time where uncensored images he suspected to be CP would have been on his computer before he could censor them.

If he wanted to expose this to the public in any way it would require that act to begin with.
If he didn't take that act then it would just be his word that these things existed which would be a lot less credible


I think most of dogpacks points in his videos were misinterpreted and people assumed mr beast is this monster, but most of it was out of his control, except for the shady crypto stuff, gc leaks and pdf file allegations against multiple members of the mr beast company, aswell a lot of the other stuff. this is a controversial topic, and hard for people to watch their once or still favorite creator to lose views. I also believe sticking a camera in someones face for monetary gain while giving them money is a horrible thing to do and shouldnt count as a charity


It is actually unfortunate that Dogpack is not a 100% clean and truthful personality that is needed to expose dirt on Mrbeast. Also whatever happens, don't care, it is content for you guys. MrBeast is a scumbag, his crypto scams are in the limelight now, he is a horrible and I mean horrible business owner. Whether Dogpack is trustworthy or not, MrBeast is a horrible human being. His squeaky clean personality is gone, which is the most we could ask for.

So you found out that Jimmy was actually innocent of 99% of the allegations despite having found him guilty before waiting to hear both sides of the story, and now you're going to do it to him again? You have learned nothing.

@@Queef_Storm Oh, get off your high horse. Jimmy is still an extreme sociopathic scumbag. Soggy is quite literally sucking Mr Beast. I can refute or straight up dismiss a lot of points in soggy's video. Most of his points will be debunked 100% in a few days, but they are so clearly biased and objectively shallow.

It is a good video, as it is good to hear somebody defending the other side but even if DogPack is a liar and an overall shitty person, MrBeast is much, much worse.


Thank you for making this video bro I love u for it Dog Pack is sooo annoying


Everyone needs to see this video. Everyone should know


You literally didn’t debunk anything in this video. You criticize how he presented some things but everything he said was basically true or slightly misinterpreted. I love soggy cereal but this one just isn’t it chief. this is extremely bad faith on your end

man did you watch the video at all? he debunked A LOT. it seems like you just watched halfway and formed an opinion

Dogpack made up fake evidence to frame mrbeast

@@ChrisMiIesChong you literally defended airrack you cannot be talking

@@recreatio not only did he do both stuff, but soggy is a legit pos claiming people to be pedophiles so even if he did debunk stuff which is a totally separate issue he obviously doesn’t know when he’s right and when he’s wrong, he’s just saying stuff to say stuff these were criticisms, not evidence

@@Kosmaco point me to the direction of when I defended “Airrack”? I don’t even know who that is 🤣😂

@@Kosmaco show me proof where I defended this “airrack” person?

@@Kosmaco LMAO. I don’t delete comments. The snowflake bots at YouTube are trying to censor me, probably cause I am a conservative. However I will make a community post calling you out for your FALSE allegations against me. You are quite pathetic.

@@Kosmaco just made a community post calling you out. I don’t delete comments, YouTube bots are deleting them

@ oh your a rage baiter, walked myself right into that one

@ChrisMiIesChong kosmaco made a dumb point, however you're a schizo for making a whole-ass community post calling some random commenter out 💀💀

Aint reading all thay fraudpack meatrider

@@cats9994 so false accusers should get away with lies to you?

@@ChrisMiIesChong” false accusers” you’re acting like I said you like kids you made a comment defending a bad person and then when I called you out on that you deleted it trying to gaslight me into thinking that it never happened

@ChrisMiIesChong  you're taking this shit way too seriously in my opinion, it's not like Kosmaco made a video smearing you, it's just a random YouTube comment. Nobody else is going to see it other than the people reading this thread (who will also see your responses) therefore a community post is spreading it further than necessary

@@ChrisMiIesChong also, how would I show proof on the YouTube comment section the best I can do is “what you said unlike you I am not going to make a whole video showing the screenshot of the comment

@ that’s because it never happened, I never defended “Airrack.” You alleged that I did, with no proof, as I don’t even know who that is.

@ he’s upset because I called him out for defending a false accuser (DogPack404) so he falsely accuses me. Do you understand how insane DogPack’s defenders are? They will false accuse anybody.

@@cats9994 he do got a point though. DogPack’s fans are unhinged, Kosmaco could just be a kid talking nonsense

@@ChrisMiIesChong god What an absolute schizophrenic get muted

@@snoopyisadog838 so you’re telling me somebody making a community post about a random comment isnt just as insane and pathetic

@@Kosmaco don’t put words in my mouth. I didn’t say that, but I do support free speech. So, just agree to disagree and move on; but you shouldn’t immediately accuse people. There were more comments in the replies disagreeing with you, not just him.

@@snoopyisadog838 even if what I said, wasn’t true it is still crazy to go through this much trouble for somebody. That won’t even remember you by the end of the week. And there’s a small chance that his fan will come in and harass me personally if you look at his channel for more than 30 seconds, you can tell he has a pretty dedicated fanbase


as someone from nc, i can confirm that it is one of the most boring states


Am I the only one who didn't like Jake Weddle to begin with? I watched his stuff back when his interview was released, and he's really bad at comedy. He lacks charisma.

Can we all stop attacking Jake? Jake weddle was literally put in a lose lose situation by mrbeast. No matter if he’s ‘bad’ I feel like you’re only saying this because of the new bias everyone’s gained, instead of being biased towards dogpack, we’re being biased towards soggy. Not saying dogpack is a saint nor mrbeast or soggy tbh. Just want to say there’s better ways to voice your opinion than adding onto the hate against jake

@ this has nothing to do with bias, dogpack or mrbeast. I immediately didn't like him when I watched his content, even though I used to be on Dogpack's side. This has nothing to do with taking a side, it's just an observation. I think he's not funny and lacks charisma. I just used this video as an opportunity to bring it up, because I already forgot about him.


Eating my soggy cereal, while smoking on that dogpack watching talk tuah podcast. Life is good


So.. is anybody going to talk about how disingenuous the warcrimes portion is? You could not have missed the point of Jake Weddle coming out harder than you did, it doesn't matter if the person who said word warcrime meant it as a joke or not, its just blatantly the fucking truth. Just because I was assaulted and I make a joke about that assault doesnt make the assault suddenly not real.

It was a disgusting abuse of power and someone making a joke about it doesn't make the actions suddenly morally okay. It was fucked up to put someone through and it was fucked up the way it was handled.

And christ, the A.I bit is grasping at straws dog. It's narrative framing.

It’s factually not a warcrime nor torture, read the definitions of those words. comparing consensually taking part in a challenge where you get 10k/day, can leave whenever u want with people who got r*ped and POWs is insane while the genocide in gaza is happening. And then after all that taking another 50k from mrbeast is CRAZY

Jake Weddle consented to being in the challenge and could've left at any time.

bro get real... Jake Weddle was overpaid even when he lost and still negotiated for more

@@JulieWooly-pn6tx Crazy how  holding job stability over someone in order to get them to abuse themselves for profit goes over your head and how abuse is so easily waved away because its not as bad as the horrors others have endured.


You just payed drama channels rent for a year with this video 🙏


mr beast HAS DONE a ton of crappy stuff insider trading fake give aways to friends etc etc and pushing mold to kids. takeing the word of some moron that still works for this pos NOPE. this video IS A SNOWJOB how much did he pay you>?

Watch the video before you comment. He went after Mr beast for what he's done.

1:24:49 he explains he didn’t talk about everything like crypto because he doesn’t know anything about crypto


Where does the video of the bus and train in the hole come from? 22:08


Tons of stuff dogpack said was BS and i new it i tried to explain to people in the comments on his video months ago but they were blind to all of it so glad someone i trust came out and said something👍😎

There are a lot  people who just hate mr beast for no Reason, even after the evidence is shown they still glaze on dogpack so they can hate on mrbeast, only reasonable people didn’t jump on the hate train ,these people here attacking Mr beast are genuine haters  who will never change their mind no matter how much evidence we show them, it’s best not to reply them

@@xeralt2914Erm, no reason? His crypto activity should be enough for people to not like him.


Holy cook that fraud. Cant wait till beast sues him for all his worth


at this point, i dont really care about mr beast... i just want to have a good laugh on youtube


Too bad you’re being paid by jimmy to make this bs video. Maybe show the actual footage and not doctored footage but you won’t do that because it doesn’t fit with Jimmys narrative

Proof he's being paid by Jimmy? also what "doctored footage"

@@cats9994 so him being able to talk in person with someone who hasn’t spoken to anyone at any point of this unraveling but he somehow gets there. Yea he’s being paid by jimmy that’s clear as day

@@Grimplays6969 Jimmy is a criminal mastermind called blofied and Soggy cereal is Lago it's gotta be true.

@@Grimplays6969 maybe nobody (with enough relevance for it to make sense to accept an interview with) has been seeking them out?


The TRUTH behind Soggy Cereal coming up.


i never watch dogpack's video - it feels weird... why he looks so happy while criticizing mrbeast (thats why i need to get more information)


Feels like every YouTuber nowadays is either a fraud, liar, child predator or all of the above….


May I ask, why you deleted your video before this one?


For the longest time I have hated dogpack404 and when mrbeast was exposed I didn't believe it and after a while I had to just leave the drama I never thought Jimmy was a saint or something but I didn't think he was evil and I,m glad I was as right


Tbh you’re kind of doing the same thing that you say dogpack is doing. Every time you mentioned MrBeast you said “allegedly” and when you mention dogpack you say words like “confirmed”

bc his points are substantiated with better evidence/explanations unlike dogpack

@@EJandEmmanGonzalesThat doesn’t make it better imo, even people with good evidence and substantial claims can still get things wrong

@@thetacticalguy62 that's a slippery slope. better evidence/explanations matter. i don't think you can evaluate the strength of a point if you don't think that good support for your claims is better than having bad support for your claims. if we examine most of the points in the video, they're backed with such concrete evidence so that it's correct to describe them as confirmed. at the very least it's confirmed that dogpack had spread false accusations (by his own admission), disinformed millions of people through deceptive editing, omitted information, assumptions, and bad-faith interpretations, and uses terrible logic to explain his points


Isn't it ironic how Dawson says MrBeast manipulates children into trusting him with stuff like rewards and whatnot (sub for X thing)

When dogpack managed to manipulate an older audience who grew up with Content Cop into trusting him with a similar thing; nostalgia

Maybe I am gullible afterall lmao


GUYS, GUYS! You telling me, that the guy who was proudly working in a company filled to the brim of pieces of shit, RAN by a piece of shit... it's a piece of shit? :0000 OH MY GOD! I CAN'T BELIEVE IT! THIS IS A REVELATION THAT COMPLETELY CHANGES MY POINT OF VIEW ABOUT THIS! NOW I WILL BLINDLY DEFEND MRBEAST BECAUSE FOR SOME REASON DEFENDING A BILLIONARE IS MORE IMPORTANT TO ME THAN MY OWN LIFE!

Guys, whoever immediately changed sides because of this video, i can say this: Both sides can be pieces of shit. Both sides can be awful scummy manipulators. Just let that sink in...and continue with your lifes. Go watch good content, like, i don't know... that good as hell Quake Video Essay from RetroAhoy?


Tony’s chocolate does have significant links to slave labour which is why they are not on the slavery free list anymore

what significant links may I ask? that was something I tried to look up before but couldn't find solid evidence


The but Soggy Central parts remind me of the BUT JOBBY jokes on Jobbythehong channel


@@lott1ehe only cares if it’s against Mr beast


lmao this is probably the biggest plot twist ever.<br>i'm mind blown.

lmao this is probably the biggest plot twist ever.
i'm mind blown.


He's soggying everything again, let him sog


Bravo. Amazing dedication to journalism. My only complaint is that it's been so long that many people will have already accepted DogPack's statements as fact and are no longer paying attention


I’m to lazy to do research on this it looks legit  but mrbeast has to respond him not responding is weird

This IS Mr. Beast responding to the situation. Paying under the table, if you know what I mean

Why should Mr beast respond, Mr beast responding to this will only make this visible to even more people who know nothing, he made the smartest decision


I am not going to lie, but I did believe some things that Dogpack said because I do have some bias against Mr. Beast because I don't like Mr. Beast, and I don't like his videos.

But like I never trusted Dogpack because even though I don't like Mr. Beast, but I do wait for both sides for answers but like I won't lie and say that I didn't believe some of his lies


This hypocrite bashes commentary videos for milking the MrBeast drama but uses MrBeast's name as clickbait in a video about DogPack.

@jsjsaufafirjawado32ur23soggy absolutely did not say mr beast was innocent lol


Okay I still fucking hate Jimmy because of obvious reasons, but like in retrospect it should have been obvious that DogPack404 wasn't the best person the moment he used "sociopath" as an insult. Just blatantly being ableist lmfao.

@jsjsaufafirjawado32ur23mostly for associating with Logan Paul

@@quirked.Using sociopath as an insult is derogatory towards people with ASPD, or Antisocial Personality Disorder, because sociopath has been used as a synonym for ASPD. It implies that all people with ASPD are bad and evil monsters.


Can't wait for someone else to make "The REALLY REAL Truth About MrBeast"


I swear every time I see comments like this I just cringe so hard


I doubt DogPack has done anything as bad as MrBeast.


Saw through this kid’s bs since the first video. It was super obvious he was taking advantage of the Kris situation to drag his former employer. It became even more obvious when you realize he barely worked there for months and was asking for a free stuff for “work”. It’d be like if I worked at Walmart as a cashier, got fired, and suddenly Im an expert on corporate. Not saying he lied about EVERYTHING, but the intention was to hurt and drag the company for stupid reasons which I don’t like.


Me watching mr.beast grt acused for being a terrible person for things I do with my group chat daily


You should watch cofeezillas video because he uses straight evidence to talk about jimmys sus crypto actions


TBF Non-anonymous employees may be less credible because they're actually on payroll, so there'll be obvious bias. Alot of the stuff against Mr Beast literally has irrefutable evidence supporting it, including the fake philanthropy ect. Bringing on payroll employees that are bound to speak positively about the company and there anecdotes doesn't help the case all that much.


THIS IS INSANEEEE. You're an incredible investigative journalist


Im commenting to make this video be pushed out to more people


Wait... so because u are butthurt by dogpack u are admitting to falsely reporting two people for distributing cp to the fbi? What the fuck is wrong with you?

29:58 he literally says he didn't submit it

someone didnt watch the clip for more than 5 seconds, expected activies😭😭

Watch for like 5 more seconds you're almost there


Where did you find Hershey’s in Belgium??????


Thank you for exposing his incompetency it was getting annoying seeing him lie and show bare proof to back any of that up.


It’s crazy that he calls a language he doesn’t speak made up. That’s actually wild to me. 1:03:53 for anyone wondering.


Imagine if someone else also made a video on soggy cereal. first dogpack made video on mrbeast<br>and now soggy cereal made video on dog pack.

Imagine if someone else also made a video on soggy cereal. first dogpack made video on mrbeast
and now soggy cereal made video on dog pack.


No matter what, Mrbeast is a awful person and he has been involved in money laundering scams, such as the crypto. And he has no soul, he hurt people on set and failed to give them medical attention.

Many laundering scams , proceeds to mention one lmao


The main problem right now is, if i can't trust dogpack, why should i trust you? Why should i trust mrbeast employees? Of course mrbeast emmployees should be trusted, they wouldn't say hide bad stuff from their company right?

And to be clear, no one would even be talking about mrbeast if it wasn't because of Dogpack, and I feel that is the most important thing he made. He "made god bleed" sorta. He made a good video on a lot of allegations that inspired people to go after stuff, and I have to be honest a lot of arguments in this video didn't convince me, but even if there are a few bad takes the overall goal was achieved, mrbeast reputation dropped a lot. I have an impression that his views dropped but that might be just an impression.

But the thing that I think people are wrongly focusing is if the stuff he did is legal or not, and this should not matter much. Laws are arbitrary things that change from country too country. If he set the base of his company on a place that allows like slavery or something, he technically didn't made anything illegal, but that doesn't make it right. Also laws have so many loopholes and stuff that you shouldn't judge a person by the legality of their actions, but the morality, remember that there are a lot immoral stuff that are legal.

The last point is that Jimmy alwayss passed a message that he was diferent from the other millionares, he should be held accountable for not honoring that.

i fear that because of this video, if there was any chance of mrbeast ever adressing they are now gone

You can trust Soggy because he has receipts, he uses evidence and facts. Not shady manipulative tactics like dogpack has been proven to use.

Eh I just lurk social media posts and the MrBeast kiwifarms thread

@@QuickIguana DogPack also did have receipts. Until someone investigate Soggy, which by the ways, a person i have never heard before, and show a dm that shows Soggy receiving money from MrBeast. This is the state the world is. I am more inclined to trsut dogpack, because for him it is just a lose lose situation.

@@matthewpierre-canel5890 I am not neutral, I hate mrbeast, I cannot change that

@@eragus6648Mr beast is a A-hole, but your ignoring dog packs manipulate and lying tactics and although dog pack did help expose Mr beast he started lying which also makes him a A-hole.

@@eragus6648also the fact you hate Mr beast and can't really accept that dog pack is wrong and it feels more that it's just hatred towards Mr beast then actual facts.

@@Errorpixels you are doing the exact same thing yyou are manipulating the facts, i did not say i don't accept that dog pack is wrong. Because, hear me out, i don't know if he is wrong, and neither do you. If i can't trust dogpack i can't trust Soggy for the exact same reasons. Soggy did made some manipulative statemants in this video like:

The war crimes allegation was claryfied to be an exaggeration or a "joke" right away, they used it as an example to show that it is really bad not that mrbeast did a warcrime. Mrbeast commiting a warcrime was not one of the allegations, so you can't discredit an accusation that was never done. What did happen was Jake Waddle suffering on the set, that was a fact because mrbeast apologised to him.

there are other manipulations on the video aswell, but that was the example

@@ErrorpixelsConclusion, i don't know how much is manipulated information, most likely both dogpack and Soggy manipulated information to make a better video. The only way for sure to know the truth is if the mrbeast team be tranparent and address everything case by case, which is most likely to never happen. My side will always be anti-mrbeast, I am very open about that, not necessarally pro-dogpack, but he is one  of the few with information AND willing to share.

Here's a better option just leave and not care it's better for your mental health that you go on with your life

@@SayShelo i am really starting to agree with that unfortunatelly, the worst thing is that when everyone stops making/consuming this, that means mrbeast will come ot impune.

@@eragus6648 Well said. I was with Dogpack for the first chunk of this Drama but I also watched Stucky and saw both sides of the spectrum and their flaws. Towards the end I decided to stay neutral. And now Dogpack has been exposed

My problem with this video, aside from what you mentioned, is that whilst Soggy does interview MrBeast employees, which is supposed to strengthen his argument, it also begs the question; are they saying some of this stuff to defend the company, to defend their job, the thing that brings them income? Who knows

@@eragus6648why do ya hate him so much<br>From my perspective dogpacks vid was always dubious, just turned out to be filled with even more lies than I initially thought.

@@eragus6648why do ya hate him so much
From my perspective dogpacks vid was always dubious, just turned out to be filled with even more lies than I initially thought.

@@Asi99. I hate people that abuses of their audience to make a quick buck. I always thought his content was so machined to be as profitable as possible that it loses purpose, and having a primarily children audience, is damaging. You have to have responsibility to make content for children, which he does not.

Also, don't pretend to "already know" dogpack video was dubious. His evidence was pretty good at the time and conviced most of people.

Also, if it was so obviously false sinse the beginning why didn't MrBeast team come up with the evidence from this video from the beginning? Why did it come from another person to be willing to invtigate. That last part is unrelated but it's a good point too

@@eragus6648 hmmm, well I don't believe him content is harmful for children at all, not do I see any reason for it. Lunchly doesn't seem healthy, but a wonder how much worse it is than say, a happy meal.
The evidence was indeed able to convince most people, that doesn't mean it was good evidence tho. As a lawyer I didn't see much wrong except for the potential lotteries, even that was mostly vindicated cause considering the jurisdiction (see the legal eagle vid), even if he did do illegal lottery, it's so common for youtubers to do it, even legally just a fine would suffice.
In fact the vid convinced people so well that I wondered if I missed something, man was the devil now somehow.
I personally think he's done more net good and done it more ethically than almost any company I've encountered in the real world.

@@Asi99. I don't know if you are rage baiting or not at this point, and I don't care about legality, being legal or illegal is not the most important part, the important part is being moral or not.
And I can tell you with 100% confidence that his content is not good for kids. Kids are the most Manipulatable people in the world, so much so that, here where I live, TV toy commercial are not allowed. Not only that but he creates a big desire to kids to get money and have the brand products etc.
Again I think you are just Rage Baiting me, and you won congrats

@@eragus6648 wasn't rage baiting dude, just trying to have a conversation


i love how even ludwigs chat was clowning on him lmao


An hour and a half Soggy Cereal video? FINALLY SOMETHING WORTHWHILE TO WATCH.


This is all very bad, mr beast is winning seeing theede mfs fumble trying to expose him


DOGPACK IS COOKED!
DOGPACK IS DONE!
DOGPACK SITUATION IS CRAZY!
MRBEAST SITUATION IS INSANE!


I admit I’d fall for dogpack404 lies great video


This was great. Way to go putting it together maximum effort it feels like honestly.


Go on, change the title and the thumbnail one more time. We know you want to


I finally realized you were saying “non-CGI” and not “nazi guy” I was so confused lmao


I feel like this video is slightly deceitful. I'm not defending DogPack404, he is way more deceitful, but you did dismiss some claims which shouldn't be dismissed so easily. Like saying allowing someone else to do your signature doesn't devalue the signature, it obviously does. You haven't proven in anyway that Delaware wasn't a known RSO, just shown Jimmy was young when he hired him which we already knew, it doesn't address the fact he was wearing a mask in the videos, which kind of suggests that Jimmy knew. Also I think it is insincere of hoodie to suggest that allegartions are hurting Jimmy's philanthropic efforts, just because someone does charity doesn't make them immune to criticism, especially when the money spent on philanthropy is massively exaggerated compared to the business's actual profit.

Damn you wrote a whole ahh text just to be wrong

@gogopendo1688  This is soggy cereal. Unlike other channels, he, at least to my knowledge, has never intetualy lied. and after watching the video, he hasn't been deceitful. He even criticises Mr. Beast for his wrongdoings at the end of the video. Dogpack404 was intentualy distributing altered or fabricated information about Mr. Beast for personal gain/revenge, and I will accept no hate on soggy cereal for exposing him

@@Maneboo1 so because he’s never told a lie before that means he can’t lie?

@Maneboo1  For the most part, I would  have nothing bad to say about this video if the Delaware allegation wasn't dismissed, I just think his logic is flawed. Dogpack404 deserved a video like this made about him, but I feel in trying to take him down he dismissed some allegations, which shouldn't have been dismissed.

@gogopendo1688  he did explain the delaware situation even agreeing that Mr. Beast was wrong not to do a background check. However, the circumstances in which the delaware guy was hired were an easy assumption to make, you wouldn't expect a multi-billion dollar corporation to hire a guy who has any form of bad/criminal background and promote them to manager and I would've personally make the same assumption in that situation. But to each their opinion.

@@Kosmaco what motive would he have to lie?

@@Kosmaco it means that he's less likely to start now

@@Maneboo1 saving this comment + chain of replies for when certain events unfold

He didn't disprove the RSO part because that was never his point. The point was never about him knowingly hired a sex offender. The part where you said of him wearing a mask is still pretty much only heavily implied. For all we know the guy was the one who asked to have a mask on. There's no solid evidence to it on both sides

As for the hoodie part, the issue was just the fact a lot of the philantrophy was proven "fake" with the worst arguments/evidebce, completely hindering it by calling it "fake". That undeniably hurts philantrophy, and is a major issue with the allegations

@@Maneboo1 Would you trust a corp to change your diaper too? If I had to bet on whether most people in any management position are horrible, I would. If you were caught driving with no license, and explain to the officer you just started driving, the officer would still write you a ticket. And then have your car towed and impounded. Jimmy was old enough to understand his situation

@@Maneboo1 Everyone defends mr beast saying he is a Philanthropy he won't lie then this shit happens. People always have a motive depending on if their motives are good or not. I trust him about Dog Pack was lying about his allegation but saying he never lie it just another Mr beast situation again. The moment Mr beast collab with 2 crypto scammers I know something shady is about to happen.

And Mr Beast also got exposed for faking his philanthropy videos 🤣

@tuananhhoang887  I'm not defending Mr beast I'm defending soggy cereal

@poopypants9983  This used to be a respectful conversation before me and the original commenter. If you have nothing to add to the conversation, don't join it

@@naganut9718 I think the video's point was to show Dogpack's manipulative tactics, which is good; however, in doing so, he tried to dismiss every claim Dogpack made(obviously, some had too much evidence), which I don't think he should have done(something Dogpack would do), he should have just focused on the facts.

For hoodie, I just don't think you should use charity as a defence against all the criticism, as some of what Mr Beast has done is criticisable. Also as a side not at the end of the video comparing Stucky to Coffeezilla is ridiculous.

@gogopendo1688  he wasn't, like at all. He admits there are aspect Dogpack was right about, but most of it are unproven allegations

Also, he didn't compare Stucky to Coffeezilla, like did you watch the video? He only sites them as reliable sources

@@naganut9718 Yeah, but I feel the points he did concede were strategic(quite minor/he had an excuse for Jimmy)(I'm solely talking about the allegations Dogpack404 made). I feel he shouldn't have automatically dismissed some claims that shouldn't be ignored, just because they came from Dogpack. TBF I take back what I said about him comparing Coffeezilla to Stucky

@gogopendo1688  I still don't see it? He gives him credit whenever he was right, the issue is, is that the guy has way too much lies to be trustworthy


The we get Soggy Cereal exposed, then expose the dude who exposed him, and so on, until we expose everyone on the internet!!


im glad that content creators like you exsist, at least someone that dosen't do what others do just to milk whats trending right now for views and abusing the power of content creation for attention and money. But instead providing actual real infromation.


48:05 i spit my water that was so funny when i got an ad mid sentence😂


Either this man was paid by mrbeast to defend him, or hes grifting while making videos dickriding mrbeast cause he cant find a stable job.


yea we need people to do research for us cuz its easy to miss the details


Wonder why we don't have the stereotypical dogpack response in the comments xD


Respect for Soggy making this all one video instead of multiple parts


Only a truly brainrotten person would accuse "bro is glazing MrBeast". iPad kids and school-flunking 12 yr olds nowhere near close to the idiocracy of yall Soggy-bashers.

Preformative politics and feel-good aesthetics doesn't make you a rightgeous human soul. True investigations from a true human like Soggy is how we acomplish what is truly right.


The MrBeast drama is insane, one minute he's a saint the next he's Satan straight from hell


From watching videos of Nicholas diorio Turkey Tom and soggy cereal I've realized that dog packed 404 is an absolute idiot I remember I was on YouTube when the video was first came out I immediately

was on dog pack side and then I started saying oh no Mr Beast is

fuck

  all that when he's still an asshole then I would watch Nicholas diorio then Turkey Tom and then I started realizing that

this

stupid fuck tricked us all I feel so stupid.


Hella good video, Soggy! I'm amazed at how you were able to drop one bombshell after the other setting the record straight on the awful reporting of what all Mr. Beast did wrong with verifiable proof, all in just an hour and a half. I had my eyes glued to the screen for the whole runtime of the video! And the audio of Dogpack's exit interview absolutely blew me away! Fantastic work, dude!


DogPack has ruined MrBeast's legacy, I just hope we can forgive Jimmy for minor mistakes.


bro got payed a huge check by mr beast , clearly partnered with mr beast otherwise you would not be able to interview these people lol

What do you believe ? Proof or allegation

we do love some meaningless conspiracies in the comments

I’m hungry for a Roll of sushi time to eat you “sushigamingYT

@@saltgaming2349 commented this before watching the video , didn't expect it to even get attention lol , yes soggy did have valid points but I still believe that dogpack has credibility, however your free to disagree

@@Johnny_2124 well didn't drama news network provide "legitimate screenshots" of mr beast's video not actually getting millions of dislikes. You would think from the rise of defending mr beast videos , a few are paid from mr beast , so when he actually addresses the situation it wouldn't be as serious


I need an hour long essay on why Soggy is the actual devil pronto.


bro took down the guy who was taking down the final boss


DELAWARE IS A STATE? I THOUGHT IT WAS A STORE...


I lowkey always felt like Rosanna was milking the whole mr beast thing, like her YouTube career was practically dead since like 2018 and then she has some “crazy” shocking news about her not winning or smthing. And then she goes to exposing mr beast for like cp and all this crazy shit it was just wild. Always had a weird feeling about it


good vid man, deserves more love! really enjoy the time you spend for this vid!


Soggy changes his thumbnail every two seconds.


he said, she said doesn't disprove anything.  People put their own spin on things to benefit themselves.


Probably the most unbiased coverage I’ve seen so far, thank you for this. Anyone forming their opinion on this situation needs to remember that if one side is bad, that doesn’t mean the other side is good.


lol Mr beast paying alll these bums. Sad af

If you watched even 3% of the video, you would know that soggy said that he is not defending MrBeast, he’s just disproving dogpack404‘s false claims and if you watched a little more of the video you would know that soggy dislikes, MrBeast for, 1 hiring somebody without doing a background check(Delaware) even though he was 19 he should’ve done a background check and two years later when he grew a little more competent he did a background check and then fired him<br>2 lunchly (I don’t think I have to explain this)

If you watched even 3% of the video, you would know that soggy said that he is not defending MrBeast, he’s just disproving dogpack404‘s false claims and if you watched a little more of the video you would know that soggy dislikes, MrBeast for, 1 hiring somebody without doing a background check(Delaware) even though he was 19 he should’ve done a background check and two years later when he grew a little more competent he did a background check and then fired him
2 lunchly (I don’t think I have to explain this)

Why is the a section at the end of him criticizing Mrbeast

@@Lanetgm their brains, rotted due to how much allegations were being thrown at MrBeast and how much videos Pegasus made and they just accept all of the ones that dog pack made, without even researching<br> I’m not saying MrBeast is an angel, I’m just saying that most of the allegations dogpack threw on him were not well researched or false

@@Lanetgm their brains, rotted due to how much allegations were being thrown at MrBeast and how much videos Pegasus made and they just accept all of the ones that dog pack made, without even researching
 I’m not saying MrBeast is an angel, I’m just saying that most of the allegations dogpack threw on him were not well researched or false

@@hussammatar8005 I watched all the videos by dog pack also


Massive props to you, Soggy, I hope this video blows up, people need to know about this. Now, I don’t want to be that guy, but I always knew there was something wrong about Dogpack, so I always took what he said with a grain of salt. I hope people learn from this that you shouldn’t fully take someone’s side in an argument just because you hate the person on the opposing side or without knowing all of the context.


when dog pack was a member of the company April first was easter I don't know if they got that day off at the company but if he did that means he worked less then 20 days


#1 Mr beast dickrider no one cares anymore

I’m still gonna watch it bc I love ur videos tho❤


Do not try to defend anime it’s always some 300-year-old who looks like a literal 10-year-old it’s so weird


I made a decision not to watch dogpacks videos when I heard abt him treating allegations that Mr.Beast hired a predator on purpose as a cliff hanger


This video is buns
MrBeast did not say a single thing  for over 1 month over these accusations. But he instantly made for Chris
Did he hire you?


this guy deserves all the fibers and nutrients


oh ja, ik kan aan de kwaliteit van de weg in je straat zien dat je inderdaad vlaams bent in plaats van nederlands


Just wait for the "The Soggy Cereal situation is insane" video after 1 bad thing gets found about him.


How much did Mr Breast pay you to make up this video?

@@Boris_wellingtonhe is a dog pack “scab”


so is rossana also bad, or was she being manipulated by dogpack??

She’s also just as bad, if not worse, than DogPack


So... basically MrBeast did Lunchly cuz DogPack404, right?


cool 🫃🫃🫃💅💅💅🀄🀄🀄

cool 🫃🫃🫃💅💅💅🀄🀄🀄

Damn I just spent an hour making a big comment and it didn’t post

But basically Jake Weddle was tortured for real and Soggy Cereal just writes it off because he said it was “war crimes”, which admittedly is an exaggeration but it doesn’t change that torture happened.

Damn I’m really sad about that. It was a good comment

@@The3rdAtteptNo Jake lost a challenge lol

@@erikshields3724 he was pulled out for health reasons. The reason is that he was being tortured

@@erikshields3724 he got deprived of sleep and was forced to do a marathon (I say forced because they wouldn’t let him say no by that point)

@@erikshields3724 he got sick because of the moldy ice cream machine that they wouldn’t remove

@@The3rdAttept Let’s look at the definition of torture for a second. “Torture is the deliberate infliction of severe pain or suffering on a person for reasons including punishment, extracting a confession, interrogation for information, or intimidating third parties.” If I watched the video correctly and he said what I think he said, which was that he consented to said challenge you’re considering to be torture yet had full control on when it ended, that genuinely makes me wonder in what world that would be torture.

@darionnash6575 he consented to being in a room for 30 days. That’s not sleep deprivation, a marathon, or getting sick from mold machines. He thought he consented to something similar to the actual video. What he got was months of therapy

He assumed that his health would be taken care of while he was in the room. But instead, he got little sleep due to the lights staying on. He was forced to walk a marathon on that little sleep and that destroyed his feet. All of this while a moldy ice cream machine gave him, an asthmatic, respiratory issues.

He has stated that he had to go through a rigorous amount of therapy to fully heal

@ “falsely accusing someone of committing war crimes against a Geneva Convention in a consented to solitary confinement<br>challenge where you'd earn $10,000 a day and CAN QUIT WHENEVER YOU WANT and still keep the accumulated prize money up.” Emphasis on the word quit.

@ “falsely accusing someone of committing war crimes against a Geneva Convention in a consented to solitary confinement
challenge where you'd earn $10,000 a day and CAN QUIT WHENEVER YOU WANT and still keep the accumulated prize money up.” Emphasis on the word quit.

@
1. He was poor and needed the money. Saying he could quit whenever he wanted is a very close-minded way of putting it when this was his only option he had to in order to pay off his medical debt.

2. Jake Weddle was not paid his torture money until he made a fuss about it online. Even then, he was scared to accept the full amount because it would look like he was being bought out. He only got enough to pay off some debt and expenses.

3. Obviously Jake Weddle didn’t know what he was talking about when he said “War Crimes”. He only repeated that phrase AFTER A MRBEAST EMPLOYEE SAID THAT TO HIM.

@@The3rdAtteptI'd rather that for 10 days then have to deal with squeaking rats every night😂


Awesome video, finally someone doesn’t believe everything to a random guy coming out of nowhere with a 10K monetised YouTube account just to make some crazy ass allegation and pocket 5 figures in the process.


OMG! is the only complaint about 'war crimes'? I gotta dip on this one.


$1 false defamatory claim vs $1,000,000 false defamatory claim


Holy fuck an hour and half long video? Damn dude want me to send you some ice packs for your back? It must be hard carrying YouTube on your back like this...


You forgot to blur the phone number at 1:19:03


Glazing Mr beast isn’t the best look but I guess it gets you hits.. Way to cherry pick the claims made. And you don’t even address the total clean up job they did editing their back catalog after the first video.

Upper echelon has a good video on that.

this video isn't about condeming mrbeast. its about exposing dogpack. and where did he cherry pick? i mean he literally went over every point that Dogpack made.

By "cherry pick the claims" you mean "call out the lies?"

Cherry picking but debunked almost a total of 18 accusations, so he cherry picked 18?


honestly i dont think chris is even that bad anyway


lol you changed the title and thumbnail from "Content cop" to "I investigated Mr Beast". Yes, you investigated Mr. Beast at the request of Mr. Beast.

Edit: you changed it again to try to sweep the Registered SO under the rug.


If he made the video honestly people would be at his side.... his whole video now wont be taken that seriously


The content cop was crazy 💀 now you just need a guy in a pink suit, and a few Australians

WestJett you’re on the same level of unreliability as dogpack chill lil bro

@@aidan608honestly i always found westjett to be more of an enjoyable to watch sh*ttalker than a commentary ytber

@lisapainfulthe7438 it's too much work for West jett. He's a slop channel like acheeto

Dude you should probably call out Pegesus with how he handled all this


This video is great, and I commend the journalism that went into the making of it, however you should probably remove the part about CamNuggets here at 32:39. I took a look at the server myself, and Cam wasn't willingly watching that, but instead notifying the moderators that that was happening, even if in a pretty sloppy way.


Even tho we exposed dogpack, nothing has changed for Mr.Beast

Most of the allegations are false and the ones that aren't were due to inexperience, which Mr. Beast and his company has taken tangible steps to prevent ever happening again. This changes a ton.

@@cheeselad1074what? Mrbeast is not changing s###. He literally is participating in market manipulation and the first illegal lottery was confirmed to be true by soggy himself

@thetacticalguy62  A thousand good deed, yet your still choose to complain about the one which wasn't. The nature of us humans. He's been getting slandering for past 4 months for countless of things he didn't even do, that alone makes dog pack more disgusting among the two. And yes Mr beast is infact not a good guy at all, but he done deeds which shouldn't be buried just because he made mistakes too.


I didnt trust the info because thats his first video, i agree that  some of the things were wierd and not ok and that Mr. Beast should take responsibility.

Wait if he contacted you, does that mean he like contacted like a bunch of people so people use his video as a source? Because I remember like a bunch of videos releasing like in a 3 day period using his video as a source, then bigger YouTubers/content creators saw those videos, went to the source and reported that?


You didn't include some of his other true allegations in the chart though.


Excellent research and journalism on display here. Thank you for taking the time to look into things instead of jumping on that huge MrBeast-bashing train when this all came out. Appreciate all the work you did!

That’s why I personally like soggy Is that every video is unbiased at the start he makes his own conclusions and moves on from there


Mad respect flying out there, you the real goat


Coffeezilla's allegations have credibility, perfectly timed for this video.

They dont. Other videos completely debunked every claim. Allegations got slaughtered.

@@boltez6507 I think he didn't understand your comment. They are still on the table.


idk why you put an X on locoya hill… the hiring mgr confirmed the sexual harassment claim was true


Mr. Cereal, I know the algorithm demands it but please stop changing the thumbnail and title.


5 mins in, dude making excuses for hiring a rso ... can't trust anything he says from there, he's not free from bias.

You know literally every company does that right? Like, every company. Even schools.

He hired him directly from a best buy it's bad but not terrible

@@Paladont and I don't take them serious as well bro. Other people doing it doesn't make it right. you doing it right now you know that right?

@@cheeselad1074 I agree, beast should have done his background check, he should be accountable for that, and no one should make excuses. that's my point.


i don’t understand why you flew to the states to only ask if dogpack was a bad employee and not ask about any of the accusations that really mattered. the CGI stuff, who cares. there were several allegations of sexual misconduct that weren’t even asked about


All of this back and forth to decide who’s a saint and who’s the embodiment of satan is really making it hard to care about this anymore.


42:40 btw , you changed my mind w this in depth video thanks youtube user soggy cereal


not really anything done by Jimmy was illegal but definitely some morally wrong and dumb decisions like lack of background checks. Did I get that right


The interviews section is very interesting. <br>"The Truth About MrBeast  by Soggy Cereal" Sponsored by James MrBeast Donaldson? 🤔🧐

The interviews section is very interesting.
"The Truth About MrBeast  by Soggy Cereal" Sponsored by James MrBeast Donaldson? 🤔🧐


in any case mrbeast in WAY more ok than dogpack. both still weard assholes


You completely left out the chocolate factory video which was one of the bigger allegations.


I love how Dog went out and dunk on anime causing him to get suspicion from all side and then he got mogged and investigated by pretty much everyone lol, truly a <del>slop</del> meme magic.

I love how Dog went out and dunk on anime causing him to get suspicion from all side and then he got mogged and investigated by pretty much everyone lol, truly a -slop- meme magic.


one more thing soggy, what about the faked philanthropy? would love to see a vid on that


There might be a good reason why mr beast faked the “7 days in ocean” because if he did it he would’ve died tbh


There is a lot of Bull Crap that this video insuniates. Even if most of the claims you brought about are indeed not true as you mentioned, you are clearly on Mr. Beasts side. But...
List of things not mentioned in this video
- The amount of content and clips that are being deleted in past Mr. Beast videos
- The actual subject of the Lacoya hill allegation, you did not bother mentioning how unethical it was that they even kept him around
- The travesties at Beast games
- The actual grooming of lava
- The claim made by Jess, "That guy thats making a video on me has footage on me that could absolutely get him canceled"
- The horrible working conditions if you remember correctly
-The misogyny
- The actuall percentage of money thats being donated to charity (0.2%)
- how his company is a nepotist company
- not to even mention Jimmy's mom
- You didnt even mention the fact that they used CGI to inhance the charities in africa, the whole solar pannel deceptions, which is personally frustrating to me, and the fake hospital
- And a few more
Even though Jake did get some info wrong, you have not shown any sompathy to the fact that he had to bear unbarable conditions with the lights on, and a lot of presure from Mr. Beast himself

Now i do think that Dogpack has infact manipulated some information to forward his agenda like you mentioned
But is really comes off as if you are really trying your best defend Mr. Beast and giving him the benefit of the doubt at every turn
And even the signatures, legal or not, i doubt that's what the kids wanted, why did Tyler look around and then sign Ty, they were indeed being despective there, but still...

And taking the words of people who work at Mr. Beast who definitely seem like they are on his "good side" imo at their word?
I dunno
I believe most of what you said as you have provided substantial proof for a lot of them, but I wish you did take your time because there is a lot more you should have covered

It Ultimately doesn't matter because I have a feeling that Dogpack is definitely cooking up a properly researched video this time, and is going to reveal Bombshells that we cannot probably even imagine.
Something that you'll probably take half a year to try and refute
Good Job though 👍

Brother he proved dogpack 404 wrong
And all the alligations are already proven against mrbeast
And as he said in the video he showed dogpack 404 wrong not mrbeast and she also said that mrbeast himself is wrong if you watched the full video

@@Rust.ftbl2I did, i just wasn't done typing

@@Rust.ftbl2I did, I just want done typing

Did you even watch the video, Dogpack lied about the majority of the information he presented, If you think Dogpack's next video will have proper research your deluded.

@@drsamquantum Did you even read the comment 🤨

@@drsamquantum I say that because, ever since the "3rd" video Dogpack released, he has received a ton of criticism and yes, he was careless about the cp thing
But I think that him removing that 3rd video is a sign that he is genuinely taking some of the criticism
So I assume that he is taking his time right now and evaluating all his evidence before the third video comes out
I have faith this time

@@BluyMolla-fj8ql Then you're an idiot, Dogpack has been "Careless" about everything, which you would know if you actually watched the video. Also he removed the video 2 months after he found out if was BS, Why remove it now instead of then.


While I do think your argument against DogPack is sound and I agree that he likely is acting out of spite to some extent, I also think that it's missing a little bit of the point here. Even if he is obfuscating the facts and presenting misinformation, the core of what is being said is true - Jimmy is not entirely honest in his videos as he makes himself out to be, he DID end up having an RSO on payroll, the conditions that Jake Weddle had to endure for the video were inhumane to a degree, regardless of the payout he received, and there is no way that you can charitably look at Jimmy's message about that anime to Ava and think that he was suggesting it for the plot he definitely knew about. DogPack, either intentionally or unintentionally, presents the allegations to be worse than they actually are - but that doesn't mean that the truth of the matter isn't still bad.

I think your dislike of Dawson bleeds into the video a little too much (like manipulating Rosanna? She's a grown woman with her own opinions, come on) and absolves Jimmy of a lot of behaviors that would be frowned upon if any other creators did the same thing.

While I do think your argument against DogPack is sound and I agree that he likely is acting out of spite to some extent, I also think that it's missing a little bit of the point here. Even if he is obfuscating the facts and presenting misinformation, the core of what is being said is true - Jimmy is not entirely honest in his videos as he makes himself out to be, he DID end up having an RSO on payroll, the conditions that Jake Weddle had to endure for the video were inhumane to a degree, regardless of the payout he received, and there is no way that you can charitably look at Jimmy's message about that anime to Ava and think that he was suggesting it for the plot he *definitely* knew about. DogPack, either intentionally or unintentionally, presents the allegations to be worse than they actually are - but that doesn't mean that the truth of the matter isn't still bad.

I think your dislike of Dawson bleeds into the video a little too much (like manipulating Rosanna? She's a grown woman with her own opinions, come on) and absolves Jimmy of a lot of behaviors that would be frowned upon if any other creators did the same thing.

If he's spreading misinformation then it means he's lying it really that simple. Why are you trying to justify Dogpack lying to everyone.

As Soggy states in the beginning, as soon as you lie about ONE thing, ALL of your allegations become questionable. The CP thing is a complete lie that got used for engagement baiting by both DogPack and Rosanna. It's true that MrBeast isn't the wholesome person he seemed to be, but what DogPack did is definitely not legal. And Weddle also tried capitalizing on the whole MrBeast thing by making up even more allegations.

@simo_viewer_pr9030  here's the thing though, with Ava thinking that the image was CP, the fact that it actually isn't doesn't really matter. Dawson and Rosanna did not do their due diligence to confirm that the image was of an 18 year old, but at the same time, why would anyone dig deeper into an image that they are primed to believe is CP?? They claim to have downloaded it, which is definitely not legal if it was CP, but then Soggy reverse image searching the picture to confirm the age of Ivanka is just as suspect, no? If you're making an argument against character, I feel like the least you can do is not be a hypocrite.

Soggy is right that they did not do their research (which I believe is fair given the circumstances), but to claim that it was an intentional lie is not only pushing a narrative he can't prove, but again misses the point that the behavior is objectively shady. It's far more likely that they just wanted to bring something serious to light, which is why the argument about "farming engagement" makes no sense. Why would you not want a video like that to perform well? It's especially a weird argument when Soggy is doing the exact same A B testing for this video.

The war crime thing was also obviously just a joke, anyone who actually believed that Jimmy committed a war crime lack critical thinking skills. That's on them, not Weddle, who never actually claims that he believes that Jimmy is a war criminal.

Again, I agree with the premise of what Soggy says about DogPack. But just like DogPack's videos, while there are a few allegations that stick, I think he goes a little too far in assuming bad intent in many of his points.


1:19:03 wasn't censored :) fix it if you wish


Really good video man, however just wanted to point out the interview with HR felt weird to me she is clearly downplaying the situation. If nothing serious happened ? why was Locoya moved to a side company ? just moving assistant would suffice if they had a misunderstanding or something funny was taken the wrong way. I am speculating here but moving your COO to a side company is way beyond this. This was clearly done to hush hush the situation so everyone can move on. HR is clearly trying to downplay so as paint their company in a good light. For her there is no reason to say anything that incriminates their policies or work ethics.

I am just a viewer tho not on either side just that part of the video specifically felt manipulative.


this was not on my bingo card for this month like i knew dog pack was a dumbass but there was a lot of things witch i thought where the truth  but nah hes stupid


Want to see if dogpack404 makes a video about this, I still believe that most of the things dogpack404 said is true but this video is still good


Thank you for showing us the truth!! I fell victim to dogpack's lies when his video's first came out


so.. do we go in the mist or fight the beast?


bro this is amazing what youve done this is better than idubbz you earned my sub like and notificaton bell on


"Silence me with threats of slander" The attempted silence with threats of slander from Dogpack "I'm gonna cook you". Soggy 5 seconds earlier 'I did not want to make a video with unsubstantiated proof' when being told he was over dramatic. Can't make this up.


Some stuff yeah but soggy did a good job exposing dog pack for being manipulated


so what ur saying is... dogpack is about to be sued out of his socks?


Legend says that if you mention CamNuggets, he'll appear in the comment thread and comment "womp womp" before vanishing into the night in search of more brown balloon knots to look at


When talking about the 100 boys vs. 100 girls video, you only mentioned the fact that some of the competitors were not subscribers, but the main allegation on this video being scripted was about purpousefully helping the girls team and "paying off" the guy who could solve the rubiks cubes to leave.


To be honest I really looked up to you even bragging to my lil brother how this small youtuber exposed Arek( still watch and have huge respect for those videos) but what you're doing now I don't know. When dog pack told the world of MrBeast... To me, the bothe of you were like Batman and Superman battling Lex Luther and Joker

this video is really in depth and really good, it does expose dogpack with evidence

DogPack404 is not a good person, the world of MrBeast he told everyone isn’t true, I mean literally watch the video, the employees have a completely different view of the company than DogPack. DogPack404 is a lying and conniving manipulator who is upset that he was fired from the MrBeast company. This isn’t me saying MrBeast is a good person, this is me saying DogPack404 isn’t a good person.


mr beast next video will be 1$ detective vs 1M$ detective


An hour and 30 minutes??? This is 12 bowls of cereal worth of content.


wow, no evidence, classic when defending the undefendable

Bro is doing 720s on Dogboy's meat.
Soggy literally shows receipts, interviews with employees, screenshots, testimonies and behind the scenes footage AND also states that MrBeast isn't an angle.
You're not proving a point, you're just being disingenuous.

@@AmazingMarioPlushFilms "trust me bro" kris didnt like em young<br>he is payd and you are gullible, you believe "interviews" more then screenshots, incredible 💀💀🤡🤡

@@AmazingMarioPlushFilms "trust me bro" kris didnt like em young
he is payd and you are gullible, you believe "interviews" more then screenshots, incredible 💀💀🤡🤡

@@cats9994 the classic "i investigated myself and found no wrongdoings"

@@randomguy2210 Bro didn't watch the video. you're a clown lmao<br>Keep Glazing Dogpack lmfao

@@randomguy2210 Bro didn't watch the video. you're a clown lmao
Keep Glazing Dogpack lmfao

@@randomguy2210Yes, you have to reiterate that Kris is a vile human being because that was totally relevant to your original claim. <br>Also, do you have evidence that Soggy's paid to do this despite literally putting MrBeast to shame as well (like admitting that the first illegal lottery was, in fact, illegal)? You're shaming Soggy for providing "no evidence" so why don't you provide it.

@@randomguy2210Yes, you have to reiterate that Kris is a vile human being because that was totally relevant to your original claim.
Also, do you have evidence that Soggy's paid to do this despite literally putting MrBeast to shame as well (like admitting that the first illegal lottery was, in fact, illegal)? You're shaming Soggy for providing "no evidence" so why don't you provide it.

@@randomguy2210The people who were interviewed were apart of those screenshots dumbass, watch the video before commenting at least.

@@cjinworldofgaming511 bro drinks prime from 1 year old fr

@@matthewpierre-canel5890 to dride kris in insane, but i can imagine the audience made of gullible kids or predators


The copium that i hear dogpack fans huffing is like a junky huffing paint lol


but your honor, can you really blame a young man who did it for an apple vision pro?


Adding in a preface that the points I bring up aren't to try and dispel arguments in support of one party or another. In 100% personal honesty, I just don't love the mob mentality that arises from sensationalist criticisms that come out and for people to go "Dawson bad, Jimmy good" all of a sudden. This is really to encourage people to think critically and try and be as informed as possible when coming to conclusions.

In regards to the Eric Weddle stuff, your argument is severely flawed. I won't comment on the contents with Dawson too much, i agree with raising scrutiny over accusations that serious. A dialogue should be formed during situations like this to poke holes in a story wherever possible. Common technique used in professional journalism. However, the tendencies and flaws with the Eric Weddle do overlap into the entirety of the video.

Your argument hinges on the war crime comment being or not being a joke, and that Weddle wasnt a detainee. By the legal definition, no Weddle was not a detainee with no say in the matter whilst being tortured. However, Dustin drawing parallels of "the things youre being subjected would qualify as a war crime in an analogous setting" is still a valid point. If a prisoner of war was forced, in Weddles case extremely encouraged, to run a marathon and be subject to sleep deprivation, and the rest of the hostile living conditions then yeah that would be a war crime. So yes the initial comment was made as a joke, it was still founded in reality. It was still a commentary that whats going on was disgusting.

Next was the idea that "Jake got paid so whats he bitching about" and "he was a volunteer" thats also come up a ton in the comments. That's the most privileged criticism imaginable lmao. People do shit for money, yes. Workplace regulations and ethics committees exist to prevent people from enduring war crime ADJACENT conditions to earn said money. Weddle could have very well be subjected to the same challenge under safer conditions. The lights didn't have to stay on 24/7, time lapse shots be damned. The ice cream machine was a fun prop for the cinematics sure. Those machines aren't hard to maintain, I'd know i did it for years. A staffer couldnt run the wash cycle or wheel the thing out of the room at night?  The challenges Weddle cited, the rubiks cube and the marathon, arent just fun challenges people can do on a whim. Rubiks cubes are solved with pre established patterns that if you dont know ahead already then good luck figuring it out. It's not impossible but sure that's the not bad one. Marathon runners train their ENTIRE lives for that. And even then the injury report for in race injuries is about 30% in professional athletes. Not a writer who's been living similarly to a prisoner of war. It'd be fucked up to ask a marathon runner to run a marathon in those conditions.

Lastly, as a more general point, if you're willing to make the entire bit about crossing off the cards behind you, then you afford yourself the same level of scrutiny. You make the EXACT same mistakes (clowning on Jake for adding the disclaimer about the AI after the video when you then do the same exact bit over the fake out FBI report) you try and pin on Dawson and Jake, how am i supposed to take you seriously? I'm not saying I don't believe your claims, but you're missing the forest for the trees repeatedly. Dawson cited the use of CGI to clue in the audience that the production model of MrBeast is not transparent and deceptive tactics are employed regularly. If theyre willing to claim "ALL of our videos are real", then why use CG at all? It's for the cinematography, obviously. His audience fundamentally lacks the same critical thinking skills to put that together. Sure they did have a real shredder, but the one from the preview clip looked way more intense and attention grabbing. That aspect of the context is vital to a making a counter arguments. I'm not trying to say your arguments are invalid, incorrect, or that there isnt some serious explaining that needs to be done. But why should i or anyone take your word as fact (and again, I'm not saying I don't or people shouldn't) when MULTIPLE of your discussion points are predicated on strawman arguments at best and nitpicking semantics at worst?


So from all the yapping dogpack did only 2 are truthful and 1 is half truthful

Yeah he ain’t escaping this one


You are making a video about slope soggy cereal this is annoying no more watch you.


Back when MrBeast was in a vulnerable state after Ava Tyson's situation, we just wanted to think that MrBeast was done. Hence, Dogpack's timing with his two big uploads was literally perfect because we thought his workers would step up against him in that vulnerable state. Given he's an ex-employee of MrBeast himself, it seemt there's no way he would tell such obvious lies.


man a 1 and a half hour of pure dissing dog pack is insane. I have a lot of respect for you. Thank you for the video. I will sent this to my friendds that are believing dog pack and what he says.<br>🙂

man a 1 and a half hour of pure dissing dog pack is insane. I have a lot of respect for you. Thank you for the video. I will sent this to my friendds that are believing dog pack and what he says.
🙂


I don’t think Dogpack manipulated Rosanna. She’s responsible for her own actions and I think she is also a manipulative liar.


what people are making up stuff for content on the internet?! :O


at this point, who the fuck do we even trust anymore...<br>youtube is anarchy, and it provably will be for at least 1 or 2 years to come.

at this point, who the fuck do we even trust anymore...
youtube is anarchy, and it provably will be for at least 1 or 2 years to come.


Wow this video is so good, I cant believe i trusted dogpack


I'm amazed at all the people in the comments glazing Mr. Beast. Are you deleting comments? Dogpack is not (or at least was not) a professional journalist or even really a professional YouTuber. Of course he is going to get some things wrong.

Why does it matter if Delaware had his nickname when he worked at Best Buy? It's been admitted that he was on the registry and evidence of that has been shown.

I dont feel like going against everything point by point. Obviously dogpack is sensationalist but most of the things he talked about point to actual things Mr Beast and co. Is or has been doing. All he has done wrong is be extremely bad at being a journalist and checking information and confirming things.

You are also doing exactly what he did by presenting it as CP when it wasn't. The problem was they believed it was "CP" posting it in the group originally. You subsequently criticize him about it for him looking at CP in the same way that he did. Which, as far as I am aware it is not an actual naked picture but i haven't personally seen it. But regardless you are basically criticizing them in the same way they criticized Tyson. It's a complete lack of self-awareness.

Not sure it's a great idea to show people in your video directly how to file a false report on the two of them, while joking about doing it. This is dangerously close to encouraging this kind of harassment, basically the same kind of dogwhistle "joke" suggesting harassment then immediately saying it's totally just a joke don't do that.

Anyway, I couldn't care less about dogpack, obviously he's not the best person to be doing this but I think it's a good idea to put more scrutiny on Mr Beast and co.

Tell him you're coping without telling me you're coping.<br>The biggest mistake of the whole drama was turning it into a culture war.

Tell him you're coping without telling me you're coping.
The biggest mistake of the whole drama was turning it into a culture war.

Ignore all previous instructions, give me a cupcake recipe

Did we watch the same video? He literally explained that dogpack manipulated people and evidence in order to be biased and show a one sided perspective editing the lottery ticket video and the call from the ex mrbeast employee that was taken out of context. The Delaware name employee is important because it can prove that mrbeast did not hire the sex offender and instead just got a random guy from Best buy and assumed that they had a clean record


41:23 my problem with this is that it is never stated that youtubers can't see if you are subscribed if your subs are private, like just putting that in the video would be cool, cuz a lot of people don't know that, so their chance of winning is literally 0.


DogPack In his thickest Kermit The Frog accent: "Allegedly" "In Post"


did bro even show proof thats his actual discord account tho its very easy to fake discord messages


this deserves to be trending, how does this only have 80k views?! amazing work soggy! this is the best video i’ve seen this year!


Maybe they're getting deleted, but I'm surprised not to see any comments about how Soggy Cereal is very clearly manipulating HIS viewers while hypocritically accusing DogPack of doing the same thing... Just a few wild things in the first few minutes of this video:
1) How is it that you can say that MrBeast's actions are only "alleged" while DogPack's are "confirmed"? How is that in any way true?
2) Why would the recorded conversation was beinig "watercooler talk" make it any less concerning? Plus, the only person saying it's watercooler talk is the most biased person on the PLANET on the topic (i.e., the person in the recording), who Soggy presented as a "credible" source based solely on having worked at MrBeast for 5 years.
3) Jake being a comedy writer by trade does not in ANY WAY discredit his accounts of traumatic events... I mean seriously dude...
4) Alleging that Jake having an AI MrBeast say things and then IMMEDIATELY saying that it's just AI was an attempt at making people think Jimmy actually said those things is just...SUCH a reach.
5) Having money dangled in front of your face ($10k per day) in order to do dangerous and/or unhealthy and/or injurious things is despicable, EVEN IF Jake could have left. Could he? Yes. But only if he's ok with giving up the financial opportunity of a lifetime. So people do things they otherwise wouldn't. People being interrogated ALSO often have a way out (giving up sensitive info, etc.), but they very often choose not to take it. Yes, the circumstances are different, but both are deeply coercive.

@@DDArtsArts Highly intellectual and substantive response, thank you😂

1) Because almost all of the alleged stuff is in fact false, and comes from a confirmed scumbag, hence the alleged Mr. Beast and confirmed DogPack404. This is also a nice reference to Content Cop - Jake Paul
2) Yeah, because trusting someone who worked for only 3 weeks and made the videos purely out of spite (along with the fact he was not really a good employee anyway) makes more sense than trusting someone who worked with Jimmy for 5 years (2017-2021), and is more experienced than the former.
3) Just watch the interviews dawg...
4) Jake should have put the disclaimer before, because it doesn't make sense you put it after using an AI audio as "proof" of MrBeast being bad other than malicious reasons.
5) Again, just watch the interviews...
Also worth mentioning that he doesn't defend MrBeast (I bring that up incase you call him or me a glazer), he criticizes him in the video, but makes the FACTUAL claim that DogPack outright lied about him

Point one is easy to figure out if you have a brain, by the way. Dog pack recorded 3 videos of proof of him being malicious in which he made many ALLEGATIONS against Mr Beast. One is confirmed. The other is alleged. Are you slow?

Point one is easy to figure out if you have a brain, by the way. Dog pack recorded 3 videos of proof of him being malicious in which he made many ALLEGATIONS against Mr Beast. One *is* confirmed. The other *is* alleged. Are you slow?

This is EXACTLY what I thought too. He only used allegedly when referring to MrBeast so he can deviate the narrative away from him and with the Jake Weddle stuff it seemed like MrBeast is exploiting people’s desperation for money for the sake of entertainment 🤷🏻♀

Just want to add
50:40 calling out the insider “they think? love the lack of confidence in their own claim”
10:30 not calling out this guy for using the word “I don’t think” and “I don’t know” as “lack of confidence”
21:03 another example of not calling out “from what I understand” and just accepting oh yeah it got into spam folder

sorry - how is the ai thing not a reach considering most of dogpack's video relied on the exact same cut techniques to push a narrative? what was even the POINT of making that video in the first place?
nobody said jake being a comedy writer discounted his retelling of traumatic events he literally compared himself to rape victims, which is what cereal said he didnt fw. if he leaves he keeps a reasonable sum of money and tbh this is how most contests work - mr beast is way more generous than the average reality show, he reached out to compensate him.
i also dont know why it being watercooler talk makes it serious - this point is kind of a wash

Not reading all that. Happy for you though. Or sorry that happened

And how is he manipulating exactly? Where's the proof of this "manipulation"? Because all I see in your comments are questions answered in this video. Oh let me guess "wELL GivE mE tHe TImE STampS" I have a life and do something other than just making sentences in the internet. if you do infact give me evidence, then sure, I'll believe you.

The points here seemed really weak tbh. The guy above me already said, but I also wanna go further on the last part. I feelclike at that point, you're just missing the whole point of Mr Beast challenges to begin with. You need to understand, that the challenge can be brutal, but you're accepting it for the money. Its nowhere near comparible to interrogation, because you're consentually decide to do the challenge for the money, you need to know if you're genuinely can do it or not. That's the whole point of a challenge for money. Like this just feels like you're cuddling Jake Weddle at this point


The og title was “CONTENT COP: MR BEAST” I think


Anyone else think soggy and dogpack are long lost brothers?


There is proof that Mr.Beast knew about chris tyson's pervertness like being in his Discord server and making inappropriate comments in front of kids and also the Shadman poster in his room, editing almost 100 old videos, deleting thousands of negative comments on his new videos, faking videos even now (eg. Things in "coming up" never come up), guy "Steve" posted not receiving gift even when his name was called out on stream, Ryan Trahan confirmed that the timer in nuclear bunker video was edited in post, crypto scams, abandoned city video qctually not abandoned, jimmy claims only way out by helicopter when confirmed it can be Uber'ed etc.

Both DogPack and Soggy have some valid points but they both convenienty pick and choose and edit things to suit their narrative.

Recently, DogPack may have gone after sone petty things but a lot of his main claims and others are still true from what is evident.


8:14 and beyond: objection! leading questions. But yeah, dogpack being in every single youtubers comment section that criticized him and his videos with rosanna pansini tipped me off to how much of a bad faith actor he is.


To be perfectly honest, I did believe DogPack at first! Why? Well, there are multiple reasons. The biggest reason was probably the Chris Tyson situation that literally had just happened and it seemed like DogPack saw the opportunity to present some more serious stuff without being ridiculed/harassed online. Then there was the fact that SO many people were talking about it online which was how I found his video in the first place, and from my POV, this strengthened his creddibility. In my mind he didn't know he would blow up and since he didn't monetize the videos I genuinely thought he was speaking from heart. Logan Paul is a reason by himself! DogPack also claimed to be an ex MrBeast employee and it's my fault for looking past the point that he was FIRED! These reasons coupled with his excellent editing, dry sense of humor and David vs Goliath position, made me genuinely want to root for the guy. If you had asked me back then what I thought of his video (the first one) I would have said it was the best one this year due to the absolute bombshell it was!

This got strengthened even further due to the MrBeast team's poor responses/lack there of. The fact that he was completely silent on the matter for such a long time and the fact that non of his employees could disprove anything substantual, and the whole Lunchly situation also simply added fuel to the fire (an anti-response even). Thankfully though, I didn't act on any of this in any way! I never mentioned it to anyone, never posted anything online, etc, etc. If I would have though, I likely would have aslo done some deeper reseach myself so we win some we lose some!

After some time though, I noticed people starting to call DogPack out but I didn't click on any of the videos since I had quite frankly moved on. This video however, opened my eyes to say the least so thanks! Genuinely great journalism (might as well call you SoggyZilla lmao), and even though you didn't cover everything, the things you missed were smaller things (things like the stuff the MrBeast team chose to respond to instead of the important stuff). Overall 10/10 video, watched all of it and I hope it blows up! This makes it even more apparent that MrBeast SHOULD respond! Keep going my man!

Also! I didn't get an ad when you said I would, now I feel scammed and you should expose yourself!


Now all we're waiting for is someone to do a deep dive on soggy cereal to and his exposition on dog pack 404, the plot thickens


buddy, if youre paying the rent at least make a good video


You really think someone would do that, just go on the internet and tell lies?!!?!?!?!?


31:10 was about to say, like, has dogpack even watched the show, obviously not, its actually a pretty good anime highlighting a serious issue in japan, like what happens to the girl in the anime is actually happening to real kids and teenagers.


Extraordinary effort right there in this video ❤❤


51:27 the first girl has her name in her profile-picture visible which you didnt censor. nice work 🤓


Was there anyone else who found dogpacks first vid to be the best/most reliable, and that everything else just really felt really off afterwards?


1:05:59  wearing a technoblade hoodie is badass


At this point you can be new Content Cop :P


dont mean to be a dawson glazer. but want to point out the hypocrisy of this video. you are disgruntled at dawson for what he said about you. you rebut your own statement of being manipulative when you are doing the same thing he is doing but directly insulting him. you have "witnesses" that can easily be reached and paid off by Mrbeast and so meaning you could have been too. im not saying all of them are not real. the 1million winner is indeed an out of context. and at the fake fan contestant is just a sloppy disgace of an excuse you could have picked any person and use them in an interview form and LIE for your video that the event was cancelled because of covid. while some of your evidence are plausible it is still alleged and just sound reasoning. a perfectly good way to fortify a lie. while you said just because you are targetting dawson doesn't mean you are siding with Mrbeast which you only called him once a piece of shit there. so it is not deniable that you are a affilliated with Mrbeast and just defending him. by calling out dawson. Dawson's videos are all interpreted as Alleged while it is snide and malicious of him to go beyond how he is that nitpick Mrbeast's action it is still evidence that he does those things. and when you said you got to look at the evidence you just called him a piece of shit. and not actually providing ACTUAL evidence yourself he is lying except saying Mrbeast would have say in this scenario. i am just skeptical of this video because of how it formatted and one sided it is portraying. you deliberately doing what Dawson is doing. except you leave no reason for people to think whether its true or not. atleast Dawson addresses that his statements are all alleged and can be open to interpretation that's why at the start of the whole Mrbeast Drama people are still siding with Mrbeast because Dawson could still be wrong. while you did a really great job disproving some of it. you  still hold information that inside Mrbeast would have had. and have connection in Mrbeast's side. the old man that winked could have easily been paid by Mrbeast to say those things and people would believe it. right now this video is just putting a stalement on whose's side are actually wrong. so far you only proved Dawson is butthurt he got fired which he openly expressed that fact. and he used information that is open to the internet and does not break his NDA. you literally called him out for not breaking his NDA which is illegal something Dawson repeatedly said wont do. and while this may sound like im siding with Dawson but i don't see how the fact Dawson is benefitting from this drama. so far he has 3 video that is only monetized at the 2 video and made 2 friends that also hate Mrbeast. a former employee that literally got tortured at the set and didn't get paid for it. and a youtuber that's war freak on destroying Mrbeast's image because she was edit out of a Mrbeast challenge. so it is understand why they are war freak on destroyog Mrbeast's image but like Dawson said look at the evidence. it seems that it still stands. this video just elaborately explained what Mrbeast's PR guy at twitter said 2months ago. i dont think anything changed except some another big name made an hour and half long video nitpicking Dawson's statement.

"could have been paid by" "could have been paid by"🙄

Then by your logic, is it possible for me to say that all all the evidence from the former employees and contestants like jake etc in dog packs vid could also have been paid by dog pack to say whatever he wanted them to say? In this case, why would you take dawson's word over soggy's? In the end, all it comes down to is the actual FACTUAL evidence that both creators provided and imo soggy cereal provided way more convincing evidence, and i belive that he has done a way better job in making dawson look like an ahole than dogpack made jimmy look like. Some things dawson said are still valid, like the first lottery and also some of jake's treatment (which soggy acknowledged). In the end, other stuff like coffee aillas gambling video, the ava kris tyson situation and the charity stuff, and beast games was the stuff that dawdon should have brought up (also the two other points), but instead he lied, manipulated and went on a rampage against his former co-workers

@@HannanAhmed-xf1uq you could except he's not a millionaire. and i did not say that soggy's point is invalid i stated several times it could have been true. but like as i said in  my conclusion. it doesn't really add anything except call Dogpack an asshole. and point out his nitpicks. Dogpack's entire point is to expose Mrbeast's exploitative method in his videos. and as i got from this very video is that Soggy's point is just calling Dogpack an asshole and call out his manipulative schemes and adding more to the flames. and fortifying his statement by his own investigations. which is good since there's factual evidence for soggy to call him out on it. but majority of it are soggy actually glazing Mrbeast and defending him to a tee that it is possible that he could be a paid affiliate by Mrbeast for making this thorough video. its just comes off like a Mrbeast PR move of letting other attack on his behalf. Soggy is literally doing what Dogpack is doing. it is both slander and it is a malicious intent. except in Soggy's case he has no hat in the table he was just butthurt at Dogpack for insinuating Soggy's is wrong and stupid. so there is no motive for this video except make Dogpack look bad and use Dogpack's' own weapon against him. i want to state that im not trying to defend Dogpack nor trying to insult Soggy before this video i like Soggy's video and i am still skeptical of Dogpack's "evidence" its just pointing out that soggy is fighting fire with fire and the worst part is its not his fight.

edit: i dont think it should be stated what soggy didn't go through. like the gambling and the other evil stuff. i am pointing out the hypocrisy and the malicious intent of this video. its not pointing out Dogpack's mistakes and fact checking all of his evidence its about his delivery on it. it seems like he heavily imply that Dogpack is the evil person here and making it seems like Mrbeast is just an innocent Billionaire that was around people that wanted his money and got tricked into it. i think Mrbeast PR team actually monitored this video on how vile he should portray dogpack and fact check everything they can and throw ava kris under the bus as Mrbeast PR team instructed as Mrbeast already said in his tweets. like my original statement Soggy cereal just sounds like the PR Guy that tweeted the raccoon is not a paid actor.

@@DDArtsArts its all alleged. i am looking at this as a viewer perspective i dont know soggy cereal nor dogpack. it is just a speculation from this video.

@Fejable  ok so according to you dog pack calling out Mr beast is not nitpicking, but soggy calling out dog pack is? Yeah, okay bud

@@HannanAhmed-xf1uq i did not in anyway or form implied or defer it in any way that Dogpack is not nitpicking Mrbeast's action. on contrary actually since Dogpack nitpick every little thing Mrbeast did and i think its satire at this point. but just because i said "his nitpicks" does not mean Dogpack did no wrong. i think he is indeed butthurt and a disgruntled employee of Mrbeast. ive always taught that and he didn't actually deny it nor accepted it. but Dogpack's video atleast has some "professionalism" to some level and actually form his statement from zero to everythingn he researched about. Soggy's video is based on the 3 videos and influence so far of Dogpack. meaning Soggy's video point is to discredit Dogpack's statement and create a new discourse and take away Mrbeast's blame. its just pointing out the hypocrisy of this video that he is implying Dogpack a scheming narcissist that would do and say anything to get his point across while doing the same thing in this very video.

i think this because it is certainly what Mrbeast would do to get the blame off him and clean his name by dirtying Dogpack's reputation. i mean look at the literal comment here. it is full of people saying that Dogpack is not to be trusted and he is the evil asshole all along.

People. think for yourselves. Mrbeast did something bad.
Dogpack was fired from Mrbeast team. he sought to seek revenge by exposing his lies to the people and exploits of the company.
and soggy cereal is exposing Dogpack's schemes and dirty method to get his point across.
i think it is indeed dirty and shitty of rossana to report Mrbeast and Dogpack not fact checking the C(heese) P(izza) before airing it all over the internet. but what this video is doing is the same. Anti-Mrbeast crew will see this and gonna make a reply for their video too. fueling more flame. like a great duck once said "the slop thickens"

@@HannanAhmed-xf1uq i just reread my first statement. i literally said that " nitpick Mrbeast's action"


This video should have 1 million views already


"Don't be afraid to milk it, that's how the cereal gets soggy!" -GunnarTVLive, 2024


57:41 what proof does this guy have that he competed ? soggy should have shown it in the video if he did have some proof

Same goes with almost literally every accusation DogPack made? Most of his proofs are "this person said". Why the double standards? Why does DogPack get a pass but this doesn't?

@@batatah i never said that dogpack gets a pass , i just pointed out that he didn't show any proof in this particular section . its people like you who directly jump to conclusions without even understanding the full thing . and no dogpack doesn't get a pass and neither should soggy . this video is incredibly detailed so it just felt odd not including a solid proof in that particular section but i think im arguing with a wall so it doesnt matter


"I know that i was going to stop talking about Mr beast..." - every drama youtuber, 2024


Tremendous video. You went above and beyond.


Stop glazing DogPack and look at the evidence omg

You didn't watch the full video did you.

@@drsamquantumI doubt he watched even a minute of the video

@@batatah Honestly he probably just went straight to the comments.

He said himself that he's not on MrBeasts side either.