Just a bunch of kids LARPing as business professionals. I'm a software engineer, self-taught, extremely successful for a fort 500 - and i can tell from almost every side, angle, and vector - none of this is professional or normal business behavior. This is what happens when a platform (YouTube,Twitch, etc) exists and gives legitimacy, and elevates grifters to relevance. Content creators are essentially like the WWE/WCW/ECW/AEW, etc -- Just abunch of performative douchebaggery cranked up to 11 screaming to the audience "IM A REAL PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS PERSON" - It is entertaining, but lawrd is it also cringy.


this is a content cop-ception I never dreamed about


istg if each and every one of you were suddenly exposed as an multi-millionaire criminal with countless charges, yall wouldn’t be jumping the gun and “speaking out and apologizing immediately”. What kind of brainrot logic is that?!?!


why in the hell Mr' Beast didn't speak up about this? Or was he about to make a very elaborative video response?

In the report that was on MrBeast's twitter and this video. MrBeast's lawyers wouldn't let him talk until they finished their investigation of the company. I doubt they still will let him talk about the crypto, Beast Games because of the lawsuit, and the illegal lotteries. Just because anything he says can go against him in court. He did have a response prepared according to Keepstar and for some reason didn't make it. Probably that was when Soggy reached out to go to NC. MrBeast's lawyers might let him talk about Kris and Delaware however.


42:28 - 43:20 No words have ever been said better on youtube drama  10/10 video.


The crazy thing is that this man probably spent 15 mins for some facts while the commentary YouTubers spent probably an hour scrolling through twitter posts to make a dumb 20 minute video


I knew something was off. In Dogpack's 1st video he said that he knew about Chris. I bet he was lying. Why would you talked about cgi and bad giveaways first instead of going straight to guy sending porn to minors.  Dogpack was busy recording people without consent to find serious  issues. This also explains why Dogpack and Rosanna put what they thought was CSAM on the thumbnail. They don't care about exposing wrong doings they just wanted to ruin Jimmy's image. Jimmy has done some has irresponsible things and the Amazon show issues are proof of that. However Dogpack's spiteful a$$ should not be making any more claims.


You just watched an hour long video of a one sided take. I suggest you try to do some investigating yourself. Take this video with a grain of salt like everything else.

@@Querianat least he watched<br>Unlike u prolly

@@Querianat least he watched
Unlike u prolly

@@purple-69- huh? What does me watching an hour and a half long video have to do with my statement. I literally just said that it is one sided and take it with a grain of salt. If. You're willing to believe anything and everything you're not worth my time.

@@purple-69- he definitely didn't and neither did you, all soggy did was dismiss dogpack's points and attack his character with minimal evidence. This doesn't disprove the many shady things that beast has done at all. Its clearly also a video that was paid by beast to be made since he's promoting it especially to other creators like dylan zitkus and the fact that he's commented (which he deleted) on his video, as well as the video title being "The real truth about mr beast" originally. Point is that soggy is far from a trustworthy source right now and is heavily biased against and is being paid off by beast

@@Querian  "One sided" a calim which u are pulling out of you your ass. I won't argue further.

@@randomised7562 ofc I didn't lol. You think I have the patience to listen to that propaganda. No thanks haha

@@randomised7562”Minimal evidence”. Lol 😂

Alright Buddy, I’m happy to argue with you. Let’s discuss the “minimal evidence” here in the comment section. Elaborate, Explain how Soggy has given minimal evidence.

Or didn’t you just not watch the video 🤡💀

@@randomised7562CP claim, Disproved in the video.

Illegal lotteries claim, Also disproved in the video and it literally doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to go research it.

@@randomised7562Soggy of course makes the occasional joke or insult towards DogPack but he literally goes into all accusations in depth. Provided numerous witnesses/ testimonies literally deducing all of the misinformation within the videos with a clear explanation.

Calling this “minimal evidence” just makes your ridiculous bias ever so clear or just is a dead giveaway that you’re too lazy to even watch the full video without having Subway Surfers in the background 😂


Youre the guy who tried fighting slop with even crazier slop and now yt recommends you, stand proud you're one of the sloppiest :)


21:53 the pit being real fueld my disbelief from 80 to 100 in a second 😱😱


so happy someone finally called dogpack on his bullshit, he didn’t do himself any favors by trying to nickel and dime every move mr beast made. it just showed to me from the first video that he is petty upset employee. they whole slowed down status bar on video adds thing. and acting like it’s the end of the world. it’s just stupid. omg a huge financially driven company used a deceitful tactic to get threw everyone’s feed me now content brains. Wow no one else has ever done anything like that. he apparently doesn’t understand how media and entertainment works. Also from my own experience as a 25 year old general manager at a restaurant in charge of 30 employees and how tough that was at that age after only worrying about myself i can’t imagine jimmy’s experience with how big his company got in such a short time. is he innocent, not at all, but i don’t for a second believe he is this demonic mastermind trying to vindictively tear people down. dogpacks a joke, thank you soggy for this. And as pettt as dog pack is i can’t wait to see his hit on you. also not gonna lie i didn’t watch this video when it first dropped because i thought it was more bullshit replaying dogpacs video in your own video like everyone else 😂😂😂 i only watched it because of pyros video explaining the content of yours.


hey that part when you asked that lady about how she felt about working with dog pack. why didnt you ask her how she felt working with that one co worker and their vibes. lol you know that one co worker. just so we can gauge how good her intuition is.


5:55 I agree with a lot of your points, but this one doesn't really work since Jimmy has a history of having his own employees pose as "normal employees". Dustin himself was posing as a worker at the bunker in the "24 hours in a doomsday bunker" video. Just because Delaware is in this video wearing a BestBuy shirt isn't conclusive proof that he wasn't already on Jimmy's payroll.


I think some of Dogpack 404 claims are truth (ofcourse not all) I hope this drama would end and know all of the truth.


Not sure how you can make this whole video, then call Dawson "incompetent." This man set out to do exactly what he did.


Do I trust Dogpack404: No
Do I trust MrBeast: No
Do i trust Soggy: HE'LL YEEEEESSSSSS!

Well this is stupid! hahaha


Woah, I didn't know Ed Sheeran works for the Beast Crew and his alias is Hoodie. He thought we wouldn't notice??


Awww your favorite manipulator Dogpack is losing? How pathetic 😂


I thought dogpack404 was actually genuine, bc guy he intervieved in the second video sounded EXTREMELY honest


Dude wtf why did this all even happen people made the stupidest drama ever especially when you have soggy who makes it clear why the accusations are stupid


God dogpack and the plastic woman beside him is so annoying


He has made one video on him, how is this milking


THE INTROOOOOOO <3 AHH I have never been so happy to hear that music again 0:54


I wouldnt trust Soggy Cereal tbh. He seems to have some weird personal vendetta going on with Dogpack on forums and whatnot.. U guys should grow up


Cool, what about faking videos on the philanthropy channel? Like the visual changes and the number of wells? Or ineffectivity of team sea and team trees? I swear i didn´t hear a thing about this in this video. And this can negatively impact charities that are more helpful, or at least effective and 100% transparent with donators.


I’m done with the lies, thank you for the corrections.


Really cool video, appresiate your hard work to put correct information out there for an unbiased opinion as possible.


I love how people ran with DogPack's video without being rational. I mean, I get there are issues with Mr. Beast, but DogPack not only mixed his videos with half-truths and hearsay but also included unfactual stuff that is ultimately hurting other justified criticism of Mr. Beast. I always say this: ask yourself why those are there. I always give Coffeezilla as an example: he researches his stuff, asks for comments, understands the serious situations, and doesn't try to muddy the waters. Coffie always takes his time and doesn't plan his videos to ride the hype. But on the other hand, we have a loser who got fired and planned his video with the Kris stuff just so he could get the most attention.


I've felt this whole time that all of this should have all been obvious, to anyone who didn't have a hard on for only one side or the other.


1:01:54 my childhood memories just blasted through me, so many goblins slain


u completely changed my mind i used to hate mrbeast


This really just shows how people will jump at anything.


conclusion: mr beast is kind of scummy, but no where near as scummy as he's made out to be


DUDE CAN PEOPLE NOT GET CANCELLED FOR 1 SECOND????


How about Mr beast deleting comments and removing incriminating parts of his YouTube’s videos? Explanation for that? lol…..


56:49 source trust me bro??? Who even is this guy please make it clear or at least clarify a bit

@DanielJacobs-rz1zl  how do I know this isn't a random dude from the street maybe show his account and highlight his account and maybe provide evidance that he actualy owned that account.

He is a guy from the scrapped challenge, if you need some sort of proof for that then you don't know how things work

@@cool3Dhorse he "claims" to be? It was a live stream so his comment most be there somewhere all I am saying that he needs more evidance to back it up.

@@Ahmad-z3o3z the day eye witness becomes irrelevant is the day humanity dies


Can we have the link to the Google Drive file for the Audio Recording of Dogpack404 being fired?


Alright, I was actually down with a lot of the claims in this video. But the war crimes section lost me. You’re doing the same shitty unreliable reporting dog pack was doing. Just because the friend says it as a joke initially has nothing to do with the fact that it actually ended up being true. Like it was in the context of saying it as a joke, but it was actually a war crime committed against him. And if you think he really had the choice to just leave at any time, then you should actually listen to what he was saying about SA victims. Don’t throw stones when you live in a city made of glass.


21:37 WAIT I CLOCKED THAT WHEN I FIRST WATCHED HIS VID…i’m a calorie nerd & when he did that i was like “oh usually people don’t know much abt nutrition, maybe he didn’t realize” but i noticed  he claims to have studied nutrition which means he wouldn’t have made a mistake like that….and now we’re seeing it might have been intentional???? damn ..


Everyone having a lot of discussions about this whole thing in the comments.
And I'll just leave here a compliment to this dude Hoodie for coming into an interview wearing a Technoblade hoodie.
Much respect, man.

Respect for what, exactly? I'm sorry if it's rude. What does using a Technoblade hoodie have to do with anything other than him being a well-respected person?


So my name is Dakota so people make jokes I’m not allowed in North and South Dakota. No that’s not it at all, in fact I’ve never been there. Sometimes my friends call me Kota as a nickname when people say I’m not allowed in those states.


when he went on ludwigs stream and was using an NDA as a cover i knew he was scummy. didnt care enough to look into it tbh but having signed an NDA and working under one for years... yeah what he used NDA for doesnt add up.


This is a good video apart from the assumptions made about Jake Weddle's trauma, his experience is his own.  The fact he got paid, while being in a financially difficult situation, is the power imbalance that was held over his head which made getting out so difficult.  The rest, I agree with, but Jake Weddle really did experience something pretty horrific and I think this video diminishes that and has a really poor understanding of power imbalances.


Yeah, that's it, I'm adding youtube to blacklist


“In todays video I paid 100 youtubers $1,000,00to make me seem like a good guy!”

(I’m just trying to be funny, I don’t know if mebeats is evil or not)


I don’t care who believes me or not ( I was just told this growing up, I don’t know this is true💀) allegedly my moms dad was banished from two states, I don’t remember what they were, for getting hit by the mail truck too many times💀 he was blind btw and his name was bill


I'm not going to take either Beast's or Dawson's side on this outside of specifics. As others have mentioned, there's some strangeness in the video itself. How was Soggy able to get direct access to current Beast employees when noted journalist and scambuster Coffeezilla wasn't? CZ is probably the most trusted name in these things and you'd think that Beast would want one of the biggest scambusters on his side... unless there was something they wanted to hide from him or were afraid that current employees would slip up on through classic social engineering. Before today, I had never heard of Soggy's channel. I'm not going to say that Soggy is a Beast glazer because I only have anecdotal observations rather than hard proof and anything besides that is baseless borderline slander. However, based on what was put in the video and both the direct access on-site plus the recording of the termination meeting raises a lot of red flags for me and makes me press a few X's to doubt.
There's no doubt that what Dawson has been doing as of late has been very questionable, I saw that myself in the Rosanne collab, and because of that the rest of his allegations can and will be brought into question and put under increased scrutiny. And honestly, it needs to be under increased scrutiny because there's a lot a stake for everyone involved. For Beast (as a company), it is the reputation of the brand. For Jimmy it is his personal reputation, same with Dawson and Rosanne. Jimmy is being portrayed as this evil mastermind willing to cross legal and ethical boundaries to make money; and while that may be true to an extent, we don't know to what extent, if any. It's all been dubious. Though, his attempted and current business associations with those like Logan Paul and KSI do not look too favorably for those who have looked into their shenanigans financially as those have been legitimately shady. For Dawson and Rosanne, it's them being disgruntled collaborators (employee in the case of Dawson). I can understand Rosanne's disgruntledness, especially if she was sold on the "authenticity" of the game she was involved in but it turned out to all be scripted and she wasn't read into it (which would be a strike against Beast in misleading the participants). And it shouldn't have to be stated that "understand" doesn't mean "condone," but I will state it regardless. And it is very clear that Dawson feels personally slighted, hence his actions and it is clear that he is gaining something from all this: money and clout.
Even if Soggy was paid off by Beast (paying for his airfare and hotels to Beast HQ, exclusive access to employees, and internal information that literally no one else has or can verify the authenticity of) to give some kind of soft glazing and write a carefully constructed counter argument with their approval, his video is still important in pointing out the glaring issues that Dawson has brought on himself. He constructed a fake YouTube page to show off one of this pieces of evidence. He has cited the work of another creator who after the fact stated that they didn't say what he said. He, allegedly (because I can't trust anyone involved in any of this), used a conversation recorded without consent (which can legally backfire depending on what state him and the other were in) as evidence which cost that person opportunities and unspecified relationships. The questionable claims about legalities involving lotteries (granted, it is different per state and the internet is Interstate Commerce and throws a wrench into things like that).
The only claims he has left that have some merit are as follows:
*Eva being a massive degen (disputed by no one).
*Jake's experience potentially having criminal ramifications as it would be coersion under duress. He was under financial distress and had a reason to keep going on top of the power imblance because of the money involved, but they kept going to the point where he's had documented issues. The money paid after the fact doesn't look good as it would appear to be "hush money" despite being aired out in public. And Jake would need to formally submit a criminal complaint to the authorities in the jurisdiction as well. Which, to be honest, I don't think will ever happen. Jake just wants to let it go at this point, I can tell.
*Questionsble giveaway practices (I am not stating illegal, but some of the stuff done is morally dubious).
*Beast employing an RSO, the only question remains is WHEN did they know about what he did. North Carolina is an "at will" state, meaning that Beast (as a company) could have fired him at any time but chose not to. Especially if it became common knowledge and therefore became a brand risk considering focus on a younger (sub-20, let's be honest, here) audience.
TL;DR - Soggy's video was good and lends a lot of light on to the whole situation, especially with undisclosed personal histories. The only thing that hurts this is, again, access to things that no one else has had access to which may lead people to believe this is the foreshadowed PR video that Dawson has been expecting for some time now, but from another creator instead of Beast themselves.
By the way, in before Legal Mindset reviews this video on stream because I know he will as part of the ever expanding Beast v. Dogpack404 saga. Same with Armcha1rExpert. The former for the legal and the latter for PR.


As someone who’s been subscribed to soggy before this, this is why i fucking love him


Hey, I DM'd you some of the info i had, did you use it in your video?


that animation video was made by goobus doobus and was making fun of people who were hating on Mr. beast for curing 1,000  blind people. so don't put his thumbnail there unless you actually know what the vids about.


Come to think of it. Most of his proof's source was literally just "Dude trust me"


lol, jimmiy is actually asking all dramatubers to cover his a ss. He reached out to morepegasus and pyro, but called of the actual interview at last minute.. You clearly just got paid by him.

So did you actually see anything in the video that's incorrect, or are you just upset it makes Dogpack look unreliable?


I’m glad Dawsons false statements are being clarified but this screams sponsored by Mr beast🫤


Honestly this video is just plain deceptive and doesn't address any of the main arguments in each allegation. Doesn't help with the fact that a self proclaimed detective continuously acts obnoxiously and condescendingly needing to insult his opponents intelligence every 5 minutes.

1. Delaware: Soggy finally addresses Delaware's name rumors but not his sex offender accusations, the interview with Garett further strengthens this as "just" rumors but didn't mention what it was related to, however jake the viking addressed on his tweet about the sex offender allegations and claimed no charges were pressed so nothing's been proven or disproven.

2. War crimes: We only have anecdotal evidence of this event since no video was released. Soggy claims Jake Weddle talks highly about MrBeast but completely sweeps under the rug the fact that Weddle admitted to accepting Jimmy's compensation (he claimed he used Jimmy's "blood" money to fund his work on twitter) after dogpack's second video went viral. So Weddle was talking shit about Jimmy and suddenly started talking highly of him AFTER he was paid?

3. Illegal lottery 3: Soggy claims dogpack purposely hiding the "free entry" description, however the main complaint was customers not receiving the shirt after purchase, which should be easily proven false by MrBeast if he showed tracking numbers.

4. CGI: Honestly it does kinda look like CGI, and I'd understand why people would believe it is so, after all soggy did admit the car was edited from red to blue. Regardless, this is not very important.

5. Feastables: So I thought this was very easy to see for myself, I just went to walmart's app, compared the 2 bars, Hershey's creamy milk chocolate (45g) and Feastables milk chocolate bar (60g), I live in Canada so the serving size is 1 bar not 1/2 as shown by soggy. I compared hershey's at 45g with feastables at 45g/60g and this is how they differ:

Hershey creamy milk chocolate (45g)

Calories: 220

Fat: 13g

Saturated Fat: 8g

Carbs: 27g

Sugars: 26g

Feastables milk chocolate bar (at 45g/60g)

Calories: 240

Fat: 14.25g

Saturated Fat: 8.25g

Carbs: 26.25g

Sugars: 22.5g

The difference is absolutely insignificant, given how a feastables bar is bigger than hershey's, it makes it ultimately unhealthier. I really found it stupid how soggy compared 30g of feastables with 43g of hershey's, of course it's healthier when it's half the bar. The only macro that feastables is lower in is the sugar content (45g/60g), which is insignificant because people don't buy "healthier" alternatives to save themselves 1-5g. For it to be significantly healthier it should be at least half the sugar content. Overall they are both the same and feastables is just as unhealthy as hersheys at 45g, and more when comparing bar to bar.

6. CP allegations: Here is when I lost all respect and credibility for dogpack (besides him collabing with rosana pansino and even renting a whole theater to watch a 1 hour long MrBeast downfall documentary, yikes...) the claims were baseless, Rosana from day 1 has given 0 evidence for any of her claims, they are always screenshots or "I heard", they manipulated the group chat's content and fabricated a story of CP distribution. She started acting like a man child (or woman child), giving out childish responses when she was being called out on Dedrio's stream.

7. More collateral damage: 58 claimed at the end of the tiktok video that nothing was edited which is highly improbable given you HAVE to edit a gameshow AND video. Regardless, not a very important allegation as we can not make much of it. As for the 1 million dollar contestant it does seem like he claims he was compensated and is satisfied, so not much to add to that.

8. Mack: He's shown as a random contestant but is constantly seen in multiple videos and sometimes winning challenges. Given that someone allowed him to stay in the mansion implies he has connections, giving him some form of favoritism and advantage. In one of the games Mack won a car for being the first one to be disqualified, soggy seems to conveniently miss out on important context every single time.

9. For the iphone giveaway, regarding the pewdiepie clip, I think it was there to strengthen the point that giveaways are often deceitful and unethical. Giveaways can be easily faked, so the only way to disprove this is with tracking numbers and not more vague testimonial screenshots like soggy showed.

10. Locoya Hill: Given the lack of evidence and the removal of his video, it's hard to believe any of these claims are real, but it conflicts with the investigation letter uploaded by MrBeast on twitter. If Locoya and other HR are innocent, why were they removed? Replacing CEO's in companies is huge. So I see why people would still raise suspicion. I'm also unsure if revealing that recording of dogpack's termination is legal or if it's even real, but it does would explain why he's so salty and eager to take down MrBeast.

11. Moon scam: I don't really think the screenshot works in favor of Soggy, the screenshot shows an email to  MrBeast team,, requesting a refund for that incident only to receive it 6 months later. So did they refund everyone at all?

12. Safety measurements: The boys vs girls game argument was about fairness. Yes, of course you should prevent the spreading of covid, but by inserting employees that potentially know how the game works, contestants are at  huge disadvantage, which diminishes the credibility and fairness of the game. If they wanted it to be truly fair, shoot the video when the pandemic is over. As for the raft video, there are no clear shots of crew members spending the night on the raft, the video clip shown of them being on a boat doesn't show the main members and doesn't prove they that they went back on the raft to sleep. So there could be some potential dishonesty there.

13. The 3 stupidest arguments from soggy:

Illegal lottery #1: Probably the biggest allegation from dogpack with the most proof. He claims MrBeast made over a million dollars from that 1 stream. MrBeast and his crew promised to personally sign every single shirt. Unfortunately for him, since it was a livestream, one of his employees was caught falsifying Jimmy's signature and immediately looks around with a guilty face while covering his pen with his hand in attempts to hide it, the guy next to him lits up his eyes and gives a guilty "I think we got caught look" expression. It doesn't matter if Jimmy "consented" to letting someone else use his signature, he lied to everyone about personally signing them. I don't know why anyone would use that argument unless it was used as a loophole in court. No one on their right mind would think scamming kids with falsified signatures is legal nor ethical, soggy is delusional and while he called dogpack an idiot in this braindead argument, I believe he's a hundred times dumber.

Interview with contestant: He interviews a contestant for a video that was supposedly cancelled due to the pandemic. He claims nonchalantly that he received a split of the 1 million dollars that MrBeast "supposedly" split equally amongst the other 23 contestants. Like are you fucking serious? He then has the audacity to say "see?" as if he proved anything except for the fact that he's the dumbest person alive. Jimmy is going through allegations for crypto scams, not paying hospitals, and illegal lotteries and now he's a saint handing out tens of thousands of dollars for free. Great.

Investigation results: If you don't believe that soggy is a dishonest paid actor by now, he claims all of his arguments to align with the investigation led by a firm hired by Mrbeast himself, the letter is on twitter as of November 1st. The investigation lasted for months and resulted in 2 very short, vague pages. It states: "As you are well aware, the Company has grown exceedingly quickly from a Youtube start-up compromised of a group of talented young individuals to a much larger entity. It is not uncommon that policies and practices essential in a mature company would lag behind commercial success." What is not common is for a law firm to excuse a licensed company from not following the law. Any licensed company is liable for knowing what is legal or not, it's absolutely inexcusable. The letter downplays the severity of the issue despite the changes being: Hire New Chief Executive Officer, Chief People Officer, General Counsel, and Chief Financial Officer. This is a complete wiping of HR and raises more questions than it answers.

In the end people like soggy make these kinds of videos for the same reason as dogpack and any other youtuber, it brings them clout and money. It just happens that shitting on MrBeast is a bit saturated and there is undiscovered opportunity on defending him. Keep in mind this is the only video the official MrBeast channel has commented and pushed while continuing to refuse to address them publicly. It would be hard like really hard for me to believe soggy is not a paid individual given the most mind boggling bad arguments he comes up with and how mocking his tone is.

dude... its really not that deep. Noones going to read all this

@@alextubey4717  Too bad, already wrote it. 🤷♂

1: It's already been proven he was a sex offender.

2: He was not being forced into anything he could have actually have left.

3: The actual complaint was over him doing it with kids, the guy clearly shows people did get what they were promised.

4: It doesn't, changing the color alone doesn't mean the vid is fake.

5: Now you just repeating an argument from the vid he compared the two which were around the same size ajd and concluded one was healthy than the other because it was as he shows.

6: Is something we both agree on so I'm going to be skipping that.

7: Do you actually think editing a vid alone makes it fake because if so you could make that argument for a lot of things, it doesn't make them true.

8: He's really not but this alone does not actually prove he has any actual ties to them outside of just the vids, if you paid attention you'd know he addresses that.

9: His point was that they were fake the vid shows people did get theirs so therefore it wasn't.

10: How does it? this doesn't change the things they were accused of being not true.

11: The point of the vid was that they did not try at all to refund people after it didn't work but they did and were going to try it again.

12: They already had everything done it would cost a lot of money to have to take it all down it's just easier to keep some who were fine and use others to take the place of people who were supposed to be there but didn't show up.

13: How are they? as the vid addresses there's nothing actually wrong with signing that as long as you have their consent and it wasn't a lie it was still people signing them using his own style of writing.

That's what the guy got paid for unless you got evidence his story isn't true just going based on feelings isn't enough.

What about their results? they aren't going to go into much detail if there's nothing else to talk about all they are saying is that they will try to improve how things are it doesn't need to say more.

In conclusion you are doing a lot of work to defend a guy who throughout the vid is proven to just be someone angry he got fired for being a weirdo.

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl
1. I don't recall him being proven to be a sex offender, but you claiming he is makes soggy's point look bad. It gives MrBeast a bad rep for hiring a pedophile while his industry is cathered towards mostly children. Whether Jimmy knows or not, the damage is done.

2. If you watched the dogpack video, Weddle kept insisting he couldn't leave because of his financial situation, NDA's, and if what he says is true, it's not as easy to just leave because of nuanced reasons like mental health.

3. Promoting to kids while also not delivering the shirts, again like I said, this one is a bit tricky to prove unless MrBeast comes out with receipts and tracking numbers. Screenshots are not very reliable.

4. Never said the video is fake, I just mentioned how it would make sense for people to THINK it's CGI, since the content has been heavily edited.

5. No, the sizes are clearly not the same. Hershey's is 45g and Feastables is 60g. I compared them both at 45g because that's the fairest comparison. If you read what I wrote the nutritional value is about the same at 45g. But if we compare both bars, feastables is unhealthier, with higher calories, fats and sugar content. MrBeast promoted it as "healthy" to which it isn't. Soggy didn't prove anything, he compared 1/2 of a bar to a full bar.

7. Again, I didn't say that. That allegation doesn't lead to anywhere so I will stop there.

8. It's suspicious, what are the chances you popped out of nowhere and consistently win prizes, even when it's seemingly ridiculous, like winning a car for being the first out?

9. I don't really understand what you mean that they were fake. Again, it's hard to prove  or disprove this. If MrBeast really want to clarify this allegation, he should show receipts and tracking numbers.

10. We don't know for certain if they are true or not, I simply pointed out there is room for suspicion and questions.

11. I don't understand how that is "the point", customers paid for it, they should be expected an immediate refund after the incident. The fact that they didn't is scummy. There is no point mentioning them re-attempting a refund.

12. Doesn't change the fact the game could potentially be rigged and unfair.

13. If you can't see what is wrong with falsifying signatures and scamming fans then I have nothing to say to you.

The guy made a ridiculously huge claim with no basis, why should I believe it? He should be the one showing me his bank deposit not me.

Because it clears nothing up and leaves us with more questions. Are we reading the same thing?

In conclusion, you are doing a lot of work to defend a guy that throughout the video has disproven none of the important allegations. Cheers.

@@OtakuHustle Cool no one's reading it. I didn't get past "video is just plain deceptive..."<br>It's really not. Keep coping.

@@OtakuHustle Cool no one's reading it. I didn't get past "video is just plain deceptive..."
It's really not. Keep coping.

Get a life other than being a keyboard warrior

@@OtakuHustle You sure spend so much time in the internet to write a whole ass essay while still being biased and got disproven


Me if mr beast is a fraud:😐<br>Me if me beast isn’t a fraud: 😐

Me if mr beast is a fraud:😐
Me if me beast isn’t a fraud: 😐

Your Attention span is even worse than a goldfish 😒😒😒

@@lastbreath3266 What does this have to do with anything? Are you braindead?


1:03:43 "your made up language" damn the netherlands is catching strays 😭😭😭


I think it’s safe to say. Everybody is a piece of shit in this situation, except for the people that are actually trying to correct this shit the right way.


Who tf should I believe its hurting my brain do I believe dogpack I thought he made a valid argument or do I believe Jimmy I've never watched one of his videos but I here bad things or do I believe soggy this is utterly scrambling 😢


Honestly the thing that made me suspicious of Dogpack was when he went on Ludwig's stream and when Ludwig tried to ask him a question about a video Dogpack immediately called Ludwig a controlled operative.


when i first watch dogpack404, i was never really sold on his "proof", because, it's all circumstantial evidence at best, there is also a bit of inconsistency, but mostly, i ignore the video. when it explode, that's when i start to be interested in it, because, hey, a new drama just drop, so might as well follow where this is going. never did i realize, that it's going to be this bundle of a mess. mr beast are still shady to me, with the way he is marketing his product toward children and stuff.

correction: the war crime joke. it's not actually joke. depraving POWs of basic human right, like solitary confinement without natural light, is actually a war crime. but, notice i mention POWs? yes, war crime only a war crime if it's done to a POWs or civilian in armed conflict (war), not civilian who is not involved in a war. it might be categorized as torture, and human right violation, but not a war crime. so it's technically not a joke, but it's still wrong to consider it a war crime, because no war are involved in the making of that video.


After reading some comments, I feel like you, Dogpack, and Mrbeast are all wrong at SOME extent. Someone can argue about your video, and the cycle will repeat. The truth is, the only thing fixing this is Mrbeast actually coming out. And then, it'll all be done.


this man just casually drops the ultimate slop generation layer on this drama.


Yezaker brought me here.<br>I was waiting for a counterargument for months

Yezaker brought me here.
I was waiting for a counterargument for months


@@SujitAdhikar-u1vhe says that but he also did not disclose in this video that his plane ticket was paid for by Dustin, a Mr Beast employee! He only admits this when asked the question during an interview! Even in his answer he drones on and on before reluctantly answering! If he wasn’t asked the question, he would never have disclosed that and that’s what makes me trust him less

@@user-yj4se9ht5e I don't see how a Mr beast employee funding his tickets conveys that Mr beast paid him to make this video


Regarding the illegal lottery #1 - YES. It definitely can be a mistake. You yourself linked us to CaptainSparklez, who for all his time on the internet is a wholesome (albeit past his prime fame period) and trustworthy content creator. But I want to know what you think of Rosanna? I'd like to think that she's just been swept up by Dogpack, and that her claims are still as valid as every other victim. That she's not malicious (at least, not at first) and is now at best just hoping to see Jimmy taken down because he deserves it


@@Basedorthodoxchad Oh I can hear it just fine. I just find it concerning when a debunking video has multiple blatant lies in it.

@@erebusvonmori8050seems like u are taking about dogpack


Commentary channels are gonna become millionaires


pretty good video but you can change the clock in the tower challenge and you didnt say that it would be impossible to change it in post you did make it sound like you cant. Also the MB signature is more valuable if mr. beast signs it personally. i dont even understand your reasoning? its like oh i got mark hamill's signature by marks friend..... but its mark hamills signature. good luck with that ebay listing.


Hmm, MrBeast's comment is missing 🤔 I wonder what happened

@@Keeb_the_mof mrbeast commented on this video then deleted it, ofc u dont know abt the comment cuz he DELETED it


This guy is helping mrbeast without looking like an idiot


He was right on some things, that cannot be avoided


Every single person involved in this at this point is coming across as disingenuous I don't trust any of you


1:01:50 bro forgot to thank Mr beast for sponsoring this video.
For those unaware Soggy admited to have been paid by Mr beast loved how he claims to be neutral about the topic yet he accepted money from a Crypto scammer taken directly from Mr beast

Show me on where he said that in the vid or anywhere.

And you would see in the same video that he is trying to defeand Mr beast Crypto scam🤣🤣🤣🤣 you can't make this thing up I swear. An hour and a half of nothing burger.

@@Ahmad-z3o3z I'm amazed that you choose tollie so blatantly, that guy didn't pay him to come it was one of the employees who used his own money for that.

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl that statement is the most PR move I have ever seen so he was paid by an employ from Mr beast = paid by mr beast that isn't new that is just buisness 101

@@Ahmad-z3o3z How so? it was literally what he did he reached to someone and that person gave him the money to go the place.

This alone doesn't prove he was paid off he's actually very critical of the guy but chooses to disprove the parts that aren't actually what happened.

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl here is a simple paragraph of the money transfer Mr beast money -> employ B who handled booking flight and hotel and everything else through his bank account -> Soggy was paid by Mr beast. Hopefully this clarifies you confusion

@Ahmad-z3o3z  Except by your own source this isn't even close to what happened.

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl do you honstly think Mr beast book every flight/hotel himself for every contestant/colaborator  lmao.<br>The interviews and cost were all covered and approved by Mr beast

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl do you honstly think Mr beast book every flight/hotel himself for every contestant/colaborator  lmao.
The interviews and cost were all covered and approved by Mr beast

@Ahmad-z3o3z  Clearly you do, he contacted people and one of the people who he contacted gave him money to come down to talk to more people.

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl🤣 just take the L maybe come up with a sold argument other than an employ who get's paid by mr beast would pay put of the goodness of his heart 20000$+ in order to make an interview about Mr beast out of his own  pocket and jimmy had nothing to do with it he didn't approve the interview the great crypto scammer had nothing to do with this just one google search would show you that mr beast commented and deleted his comment thanking soggy and mr beast is contacting other content creators to review Soggy's video but who needs logic am I right

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl a producer with a salary of 50k paid for a +15k trip for his employer I mean sure let's ignore that this is litterly his job for a moment. Soggy accepted it without even knowing who paid for it!!!???

@Ahmad-z3o3z  About the Crypto scam, 1:24:43
When does he defend it?

Also, I find it ironic how when DogPack tries pressuring Soggy Cereal into making a video against MrBeast, nobody cares, but when Soggy finally makes his video against DogPack (not in defense of MrBeast), people start rasing pitchforks and theorizing that he was paid.

Send a link of this proof that he was paid and I may reconsider. But if not, keep coping.

@@Ahmad-z3o3zAlso, I saw that Chud Logic segment in question. Soggy never says that he was paid by MRBEAST to MAKE THIS VIDEO. If you literally just listened, you would hear that he said that DUSTIN paid his PLANE TICKETS on a NON MrBeast card because the flights were too expensive for Soggy to afford. Stop taking that kind of info and trying to manipulate it, it's extremely disingenuous and you're pulling a DogPack.


Some politician about to pay doggpack a bag 😂


This is the 2nd video ive watched after months regarding Mrbeast. I had watched dogpacks only video back then which were mostly manipulative allegations.  Who cares if the car is CGI? or if the contests are real or not? People watch youtube as a source of entertainment. I've shrugged off the entire video as it didn't seem that serious and didn't bother catching up w the drama as its just a massive waste of time.

I disagree. It was still faked and he lied to his audience.

@@Anomity99 In that case we should boycott reality TV shows as a whole.


Strawman by answering questions who were asked with relevant information and amswers?


Crazy how one man can ruin mr beast's reputation

It shouldnt be, no one can do anything 100% ,absolute doesn't exist, in this case you can't please everyone ,there will always be a fraction of people against you no matter what you do ,good or bad. Since Mr beast is such a huge figure ,the fraction people who hated him is also big ,dogpack was just a person  to bell the cat which gave this portion of people an opportunity to slander him openly ,dogpack was just the initiator. People were ready and waiting.

@@SujitAdhikar-u1v woah thats alot of words, too bad I ain't reading em


No we dont he threatend to sue q 16 year old girl for defending him. Hes not owed shit


And this video wont get even half as many views and as any ONE of dogpack's vids.
Most of the creators who coalbed with dogpack MAY NOT even address this vid (but i hope they do).

In the end the internet will move one like nothing happened... (but i hope something does happen)


This is real journalism. Good job Soggy!


We should all report them for CP . They had access to those images


Mr Beast = Sentinel Prime<br>Dogpack = D-16

Mr Beast = Sentinel Prime
Dogpack = D-16


Well unlike anyone taking side, I side with no one and take this information as a awareness for myself while sip a tea seeing these people taking side take the massive L ☕
I never trust Mr Beast especially the charity video, but Dogpack404 is very suspicious from the start due to his face apperance worsen by his behavior and the way he act that looked like idubbbz being the version 2.0
So yeah all I want is truth, and just truth, never praise both of these people infact only criticsm 😂
Bro the milkers are gonna burst money glitch 💀


I love youtube that respects old youtube


Somebody tag Captain Disilusion to disprove the CGI parts


Yo dude why did you delete the last video on slop content? i personally agreed with you and deleting makes it feel like you were pressurized to do so.


I think this was always very obviously that Dawson was an untrustworthy source. A disgruntled employee being the main person spearheading the attack against Mr. Beast's career was always going to end badly. He has said that he is not doing this for clout and yet he went on Rosanna's channel and joking about the wildly fucked up stuff that they found in a leaked group chat was for nothing but for clout.


I'll be honest, i took everything Dogpack said with a BOULDER of salt, because something didn't feel right. Idk what, but something about him, his videos, and the allegations just felt off. I felt like I couldn't trust his claims, either because something felt off about the claims, or his personality and motivations. I'm pretty happy to see that my bull$#!+ detector is still working great, even several years after i stopped needing to use it daily for work 😂.


What have I learned over the past year about content creators?

Each one is unethical and is chasing the bag.

As someone who has no inkling or desire to make money, I can not say why someone would throw their morals away for attention and fame.


Yo love it that a belgian makes a great video :)
I really think the content cop intro is great!
it's a real awesome video!


Goede video<br>"Mister Biest" we raken nooit helemaal van accenten af huh? :')

Goede video
"Mister Biest" we raken nooit helemaal van accenten af huh? :')


This feels like the John Swan stuff all over again. Also, downloading and then reverse image searching said "thing" is beyond even LOLCow levels of stupidity.


Imagine risking your life for a YouTube video


oh dear soggy, we didnt know if locoya is real but apparently you got his voice recording that he is the COO of mr beast. RIP to mr beast gang. good job soggy been soggy XD


Soggy Cereal and Dogpack404 collab when?


Amazing video I’m very glad that this has been uploaded this not only changed my opinion on this but I’m sure many others


Also, DogPack has since deleted every MrBeast video he made except the first 2


Oh no it’s not like I’ve been saying this since he made his video smear campaign


Finally somebody exposed Dogpack. I knew he lied for profit since I checked some of his accusations but I didn't expect that almost everything he said was a fraud


I hope to see commentary youtbers talk about this, they are late already


Drew Gooden mention has entered the chat.


Interesting video. But I can't help but feel there is a strong bias towards Mr.Beast. I get that dogpack has an ulterior motive but hasn't this whole situation still exposed the Mr Beast brand as another blood sucking corporation? An image that Jimmy was clearly trying to stray away from. This video just seems like deflection and well construed damage control because I still feel like there are many unanswered questions surrounding the ethics and morality of the Mr Beast brand.

To me, all of them are scumbags. The only motivating factor for Jimmy, Dogpack and Soggy is money. It's as simple as that.


Thank good many people questioning your video like they saying you are no diffirent than your enemy Dogpack maybe even more worse because pretty much you defending shady person.


thank you so much for make this vid. i watch anther much smaller person who is doing what you are doing exposing dogpack and the one girl for being a manipulative liar. is mr beast the best no but he no where near the person they are trying to paint him as


Je hebt helemaal gelijk ik vertrouwde dogpack niet van af het begin


i mostly agree but this video is lowk obnoxious 💀


After watching dogpack first video I could sense something was off with him.


Wow jimmy really went on a shopping spree this time


it's only been a few days and slop channels are already using this video


And this is the point it's all officially gotten to be to much to follow


Stop the cringe<br>This doesn't mean you can't criticize MrBeast

Stop the cringe
This doesn't mean you can't criticize MrBeast


You’re literally getting over dramatic offer dog pack calling you over dramatic. It feels like the only reason you’re doing this is because he called you over dramatic and now you’re salty. You might have some credible claims, I wouldn’t know, you axed all your credibility by behaving exactly the way dogpack called you out for. If he hurt people, that sucks and he should apologize, but your claims of having “debunked” anything are pure slop.


Mmmyes you see he could've left anytime. Because the promise of needed money is totally not any sort of duress or whatever

@iatianegs  okay and? Weddle was still put in solitary confinement for conent. Putting people into hunger games or squid game because they desperately need the money is cruelty, but solitary confinement is okay if it is done by mr beast?

@@deandage2703 its fine because he can leave at anytime. It is not confinement if he can leave, if you can leave simply put you are not confined

@arkaem7549  "nobody forced these people to participate in squid game" ahh response

@@deandage2703 im confused what are you talking about? im talking about dogpack404s videos being non profit...

@@deandage2703 yeah but thats a tvshow, you can't compare the two. Foolish response

@@iatianegs I'm talking about the guy forced to be trapped in solitary confinement for literal weeks while his mental health declined rapidly, all for money that he was in need of

@@arkaem7549 you're true, one is fictional, one happened in real life. That makes the irl version less bad, right? :)

@@deandage2703 oh mb i didnt know the context. i thought u were talking about both dogpack404 and mrbeast wanting money, which is why i mentioned dogpack was non profit

@@iatianegs no biggie! I don't really care about who dogpack is as a person tbf. It is how nobody cares about Edward Snowden. They drop their information and then they basically disappear.

Yes, ofc there is a difference between US surveillance and the silly child gambling man, but still.


This whole Thing suddenly became very funny, good Job Content Cop 3


thx for making this vid and educating people


Soggy cereal vs dogpack404

Who would win???


maybe ali koca the eggman was right all along...


small thing here if someone can answer, earlier in the video he mentions that having an nda ia a common excuse for making false claims, but in this video at 46:44 you can hear the hiring manager mention an nda. just something i saw, hopefully someone can answer
edit: later on he mentions in the video he broke the nda multiple times, so im going to assume here the idea behind his (soggy) claim was that he hids behind the nda when its convenient but breaks it any other time. guess the video answered my question lmao

nda means "non disclosure agreement", basically you sign it before receiving confidential info, then leak if you that info, you are liable to be sued. alot of companies make employees sign these if they are given info they don't want to get out

@@kssm yes i was asking why he said that having an nda was a common exuse (implying earlier on that he didnt have one) but as mentioned in the video the manager clearly said he has one, so it was a contradiction. then later in the video he was saying he was breaking the nda so it answered my question as i said in the edit


What happened to YouTube I remember when I was a child it was a lot of let’s plays, after it was funny videos, after challenges videos and now today it’s just drama can we just return back to the good old time. Most content on YouTube now is just so depressing today

this is because at the time the internet was not that big the population and the internet has grown I mean you can still find those videos you just have to look for them now


nothing will ever make me like Mr Beast and his disgusting "philanthropy"


Soggy just pwnd dogpack. that dude is a total fraud.

Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

@@shadowed69 maybe but look at all the stuff Dogpack lied about bro. thats defamation and slander. This dudes  is a better journalist .


I finally found that anime again... now i can rewatch it


I don't really know why people like autographs and autographed stuff, but I doubt it is because it is legally binding. So even if it legally might not count as fraud, it doesn't strike me as outstanding behavior imply the autograph on the merge is yours if it is not.


Dude was grinding destroing a  community

Dude was grinding destroing a  community


small nitpick, not really relevant, but "5head" more often just means someone has a really big forehead. It could imply someone's big-brained, but also could just imply someone's ugly.

i thought that 5head means like smart or smth

@@IbrahimAli-ix3rl it can, but doesn't necessarily. It's a pun on forehead (4head). So it generally means a big forehead. It was originally an insult in fact.

@@lovelydumpling ahh ok, thanks for explaining


Your actions today are appreciated, and will not be forgotten.  ❤


@thatgirlwearingglasses4133  yes he is. A cryptoscammer too. Look at lunchly, selling trash to kids for money. His whole personality is money.


dogpack claims that these videos have been removed. Are you able to cite your sources?

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl You seem up to date with it. Can you better guide me to a list of sources?

@@halstephenson1 The vid is the source you should be watching.


Pegasus is going to milk this like crazy with this one


oh boi, can't want for the video on what good things P.Diddy did and how bad his victims behaved in some situations, that surely will help fix this poor man's hurt reputation for no reason at all/s


When Emily said that I’m here with soggy it seemed like everyone was informed about this pro beast video was coming out


Ah, crap. Clicked on this because of the content cop outfit, got sucked in. Guess I'm stuck hearing about this controversy I didn't care about for the next 87 minutes!


The comment is deleted i guess (I cant find it) but MrBeast said "Finally someone not slandering me, lol"


I don't like mrbeast; I think he's pretentious, exploitative and annoying. Don't have any solid proof but at least my comment is more credible than dogpack's video.


Pegasus fans gonna have a slop feast on this one


Conclusion: you’re all in the wrong and being deceptive


He literally just disproved false evidence

Your the ultimate dogpack meatrider <br>Dogpack is a worse person then mrbeast cry about it

Your the ultimate dogpack meatrider
Dogpack is a worse person then mrbeast cry about it


Its so crazy and fucked up how easily you can make people believe anything on the internet if you lie confusingly enough


The content cop is amazing not wnough love twords it


Idk, I’m beginning to think neither Dawson nor Jimmy are good people here. Jimmy is still shady as shit (some things in this video didn’t substantially disprove Dogpack’s claims or misinterpreted things) and Dogpack now has some reasonable doubt cast over him (other things in this video DID disprove things and actually made me change my stance on the illegal lotteries, except for the claim that a fake signature doesn’t devalue an item, it absolutely does).

Coffeezilla needs to be taken into consideration as well, he uncovered that Mr Beast has a moderate likelihood of having committed insider trading and we already knew Mr Beast admitted to participating in a Ponzi scheme previously. So Jimmy could be only financially successful off of highly illegal gains. Jimmy also was 100% aware of Kris Tyson’s pedophilia, this video did not disprove that, so the fact Kris was allowed to continue working with the team is best case the “He’s my fucken friend” (actual quote from Beast) bias at work, and worst case malicious negligence and disregard for the weight of such a situation. Additionally, the lack of a public statement this entire time is probably one of the most damning pieces against Jimmy.

All that said, Dawson has now been caught repeatedly using manipulative editing to only show half the story, with other clips from the same videos or simple use of the Wayback machine showing he’s just flat out wrong on certain claims. And the CP thing, while it turned out not to be CP, it is still INCREDIBLY insane to distribute and flaunt what you believe to be CP before and audience, especially in a thumbnail.

I think at this point the charges that need to be levied are against Jimmy for his financial crimes and general negligence between people like Kris being allowed on staff and BeastGames’ poor operation, Dogpack on defamation and possession/distribution of what he believed to be CP (which should constitute the crime), and Kris for obviously being a fucking pedophile.


i dont wanna give you my fibers and nutrients :(


Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

@@shadowed69 if you watched the video, you'd see that Mr Beast didn't know this when he hired the guy. I agree that Mr Beast is problematic and I don't like him either, but this video shows that the Dogpack videos aren't (fully) correct


Not to be a tinfoil hat Andy but .. How do we know Mr.Beast didn't pay people off to say these things?

Like, I do see that there are some huge holes in Dogpack's video that are pretty egregious. But, some of these interviews in Soggy's video .. idk man. Beast could pay off a lot of people to paint himself in a good light.

Great video regardless, Soggy! These issues needed to be brought up.


This is exactly the same as Dogpack 404's videos. Your evidence is no stronger than his. You're both clowns.

Nah, you just cant accept reality that your favorite DogFraud is getting exposed


Its so funny seeing the mrbeast glazers thinking this video proves mrbeast is innocent even tho thats not even the point of the vid


Is he going to respond to the coffeezilla video as well?

@@plum.world.entertainment He didn't say "nu uh" a single time.  He provided solid evidence showing Dockpack's claims were false


From what it seems, based one everything I've seem, Jimmy's a guy who's not a business man trying to work as one


honestly thought dogpacks evidence was mostly crap from the beginning


You cab tell by the title this is gonna be good

you realise that he changed it right? Its because it was obvious that soggy was paid by beast to make this video


42:31 Actually watch the video before you comment


girl what read my comment before u comment what r u talking abt

@@esme_melody  so what do you mean by "you went to North Carolina"


Only thing i got from this video is that Dustin Is a really nice guy


It literally does devalue "MrBeast" signature, if it is not from him tho...<br>5Head doesnt maen he is calling himself smart, it can mean, and usually does, that he is just pretending to be smart, it literally is highlighted on screen of the definition you showed xD

It literally does devalue "MrBeast" signature, if it is not from him tho...
5Head doesnt maen he is calling himself smart, it can mean, and usually does, that he is just pretending to be smart, it literally is highlighted on screen of the definition you showed xD


What about the claims of cgi on the philanthropy channel like extra or worse looking buildings?


I guess you can say Dogpack learned from the best


slightly off topic from the main point (but everything that can be said about that has probably been said already) but i've been annoyed by dogpack's frequent usage of ai generated images since his first video, so i guess it's no surprise to see him constantly using it not just for his fan ideas but also presumably for actual work pitches in here? but i paused on a reddit comment where he seems to be somewhat against ai being used for that purpose 💀 the hypocrisy never ends

also rubs me the wrong way when he said "i'm too lazy to translate your made up language" even though i know it's kind of a meme to call some languages that.. in that specific context it felt so dismissive and rude lol the guy really seems like an asshole


Ask me how I know you didn't watch the video...


very interesting point but i wait for doggy counter attack on soggy for misleading and lied XD


i was actually thinking dogpack404 and soggycereal would be a great duo

cuz yk

exposer of the most popular youtuber and exposer of the kind of 2nd most popular youtuber


Here's why the soggy cereal video is bad:

(0:37) “Philanthropy that's helping thousands and millions of people”
Do you mean to say philanthropy that helps shield Mr. Beast from criticism?

(5:36) Dogpack never said that Mrbeast definitely knew as shown at (48:40) in the “I worked for Mrbeast he's a sociopath” video.

(6:24) He did wear a mask without removing it in the “I Spent 24 Hours Straight In Insane Asylum” video

(6:47) Sorry, bro, but witness testimony isn't good enough evidence against Dog Pack especially of a Mrbeast employee

(10:25) You saying that Jake the Viking is an untrustworthy person doesn't make him untrustworthy. In the same way, Garrett shouldn't be seen as trustworthy.

(10:36) Again, watch (48:40) in the “I worked for Mrbeast he's a sociopath” video.

(17:00) First things first, he was referring to the “no purchase necessary” text you idiot.

The second thing is that it would still be considered a lottery even if they have a free option

The third thing is that he didn't say that this was an ‘illegal’ lottery since he already said “The website did have a "no purchase necessary" link hidden at the bottom of the page.”

 Also, the “Buy This Shirt To Be In A Video” video was still a lottery, even if he had a free way to enter, as it still ticks the consideration box for those who bought the shirt.

(20:52) “Not true” You know Dogpack was very careful with his words as he said “ I don't know if it got resolved” instead of saying somewhere along the lines of “The issue didn't get resolved”

(21:15) Again Dogpack said “per bar” instead of saying “per gram”.
And to add pain to the misery it's still unhealthier than the previous formula.

(22:02) Why does the “Controlled opposition” admit to using CGI in the hole at (1:10:58)?

(22:13) They did use CGI for the shredder at one point though.

(22:26) Dogpack again isn't wrong as the colour of the car did get digitally lifted and Mrbeast still used CGI to use a false colour on the car.

(24:03)“The CP was PROBABLY more disgusting”. There you go he didn't confirm it was CP

It's like saying that a police officer who caught a criminal having CP and then tried to reverse an image search to find the creator of the CP is a criminal because he held CP in the end. Bro this is why context is important.

(33:50) Yes, Dogpack should be confronted for pushing thirst traps on Mrbeast's channel, and it would not be ok for Mrbeast to try drugs on YouTube. Now I understand why Dogpack got fired. I think we can all agree that any form of sexual thumbnails should be banned on YouTube.

(35:40) Again, witness testimony isn't good enough evidence against Dog Pack, especially of a Mrbeast contestant who won a lot of money in the end by Mrbeast.

(36:52) Do you mean to say “I did rather believe a person who defends Mrbeast and is also a Mrbeast contestant who won a lot of money in the end by Mrbeast than The guy who exposed Mrbeast”

(37:04) Again, witness testimony, especially of a Mrbeast contestant who won a lot of money at the end by Mrbeast doesn't help prove to people that he is a random subscriber.

(44:57) Read my Reddit post in response to the Stucky video:
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/s/fTc9vpfq90

(47:29) “Him saying he's not getting anything out of these videos” he didn't say he's not getting anything out of these videos as he's still getting fame but he said that the video is not monetised.

(47:59) This point was already covered by Stucky and I have already responded to that in my Reddit post.

(51:39) Why didn't Mrbeast mention that in his video?

(53:11) You can see that the colour of the timer in (52:56) is a little bit different than the colour in (52:59)

(53:30) I allegedly think that most of the people already knew that he was breaking his NDA

(53:59) Why didn't they mention this in something like a Behind-the-scenes video? I do appreciate you bringing this information on YouTube, but I do think that Mrbeast should be the one to bring this information on YouTube, and he should have brought this before Dogpack started to confront Mrbeast on 24th July 2024.

(54:36) He didn't say “Luxurious production yacht”. Instead, he said, “Production yacht”. He may be trying to imply that it was luxurious as we see the photo of a golden ship but there still isn't any solid evidence for this claim. Again I do appreciate you bringing this information on YouTube, but I do think that Mrbeast should be the one to bring this information on YouTube, and he should have brought this before Dogpack started to confront Mrbeast on 24th July 2024.

(56:28) Again I do appreciate you bringing this information on YouTube, but I do think that Mrbeast should be the one to bring this information on YouTube, and he should have brought this before Dogpack started to confront Mrbeast on 24th July 2024.

(56:39) Again witness testimony isn't good enough evidence against Dog Pack.

(55:57) I want them to be transparent about the entire Mrbeast company and it shouldn't have taken Dogpack confronting Mrbeast on 24th July 2024  to get them to tell you everything.

(59:26) “We investigated ourselves and found ourselves innocent”

(1:00:29) It's not about whether it's legal or not but about him being lazy and not signing all his signatures himself.

(1:01:00) Bro watch the (21:20)–(21:59) of the “I Worked For MrBeast, He's A Fraud” video again as he debunks the free sign-up argument and PURCHASE IS NECESSARY for you to win extra rewards, which are lotteries in and of itself.

(1:04:55) Again “lies and misinformation” coming from witness testimony isn't good enough evidence against Dog Pack especially from a Mrbeast employee

(1:08:48) The argument was allegedly trying to associate no does not mean no with never giving up but it's allegedly meant to try to bully people who reject or disapprove a demand of the Mrbeast company accept or approve the demand of the Mrbeast company.

(1:10:23) Again I do appreciate you bringing this information on YouTube, but I do think that Mrbeast should be the one to bring this information on YouTube, and he should have brought this before Dogpack started to confront Mrbeast on 24th July 2024.

(1:11:19)–(1:20:19) Again, witness testimony isn't good enough evidence against Dog Pack, especially of Mrbeast employees.

(1:20:20) Do you mean to say that there will not be people who will be recorded being helped by Mrbeast so that Mrbeast can make himself look good?

(1:22:16) Bro watch the (2:35) of the “I Worked For MrBeast, He's A Fraud” video

@RichardGAG  Do you have proof that I am Dogpack? No, you don't. So just shut up.

@@TheMangaWasBetter77786 “No, you don’t. So just shut up” what are you? 12? Please admit you glaze Dogpack. Actually go outside than be a keyboard warrior


commenting for referencment bcs its a good video<br>and the exposer exposed situation is really funny

commenting for referencment bcs its a good video
and the exposer exposed situation is really funny


Regardless of what disgusting stuff dogpack does, you honestly, pretty entertaining yourself. Thank you for bringing back content cop, and please continue doing that. :)


Whatever happened to "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"


its interesting for you to mention integrity, since pegasus has helped you to rise up a lot and you acted to him like you were great friends

i agree that dawson may not be the BEST person but you of all people certainly have to mention manipulation in the very beginning of your video

also you shouldve not mentioned all of dawsons sources, because many of them still have a JOB, they were simply trying to help what they believed was right and now this will impact them financially


the truth about dogpack404 and soggy cereal


47:53 turned off adblock and restarted the video.  I've said even if all the allegations are true (obviously not to anyone capable of crtitical thinking) that MrBeast's cntribution to humanity is always going to be a net positive.


Good fucking video, came from nick deorio 👏


oh i dont care about this. i dont even know these people


proving dogpack wrong doesn't make mr beast right it just shows how dogpack used the limelight of hate that was surrounding mr beast and manipulated it for his gain.

@@c4chottu10 but pedo allegations,  faking video allegations , are huge so yu saying that is right 😳😳😳


So basically,,, everyone in this drama is a diferent flavour of bad person?

Honestly? Should have expected it. Thats one me guys lol


Things I trust, stuff like the proven doctored description of the 3rd supposed illegal lottery, stuff I'm skeptical of statements made by people after DogPacks videos as those people could have easily been paid off by Beasts company, things I don't trust anything said by the employees.


This is such a good video. Thanks for all the work and rigor you put into this. F DP.


Thanks i always knew something wasnt right


Honestly, not sure who to trust anymore at this point lol


I don't care about the means, someone trying to take down a guy I don't like that has this aura of bUT hE dID a gOoD THiNG is doing the right thing. I don't eat crayons, but I also don't care about the facts if they fit an agenda that I have.


Nah, aint no way they still try to hide begind their fraudulent charity lol

@@basimcool9278I’m pretty sure soggy cereal didn’t talk about Dawson’s claims of faking charity to much


1:26:40
That could be true, but if it wasn’t for dogpack, would these other creators be making videos about MrBeast? I don’t know, maybe, but it would have taken a lot longer.


I have 2 things to say. Unpopular opinion the YouTube slop video was fire. I think the points made were harsh but on point for the most part. 2nd with the anime thing. I'm pretty sure ethe age of consent in Japan is sixteen so even if it was about that kind of relationship it may be socially acceptable in Japan. Obviously I don't fully know but the fact that people say this and others believe is pretty bad we need to more research before making opinions.


a/b testing what you think is cp is insane


French accent detected. Opinion discarded.


rosanna has been crying like a baby since she lost that hide and seek video lol


So clearly whoever has more money can win at last so no matter how that’s bullshit.


Are these interviews filmed at mr beast company? 😅


i swear dogpack will rebunk it and then get debunked again and then get rebunked, ts is so confusing


Why are you making fun of Dog Pack asking to keep his job? What is so bad about that? Be the better person.
Dog Pack suggesting Mr. Beast take all the drugs seems like a normal thing Mr. Beast would do. Have you seen his early videos?
They literally admitted to advertising their channel to kids. They know mostly kids watch their stuff.
No questions at all about his link to Shadman? Seems weird.
We all know Feastables suck as much as Lunchables. How people say Hershey's is any better is comical. It's better than not eating though.
He talked about all his money, but still asks his child fans to fix his Feastable displays in stores.
We already know about the 7 days at sea stuff. So why didn't they stop Weddle from the continued confinement? If they cared that much about safety?
Just because they hire a third party, doesn't mean that third party received all the evidence. It just keeps from showing bias.
You didn't even ask about the whole Amazon show stuff? Didn't ask about Team Seas or Team Trees? I know the show lawsuit is still going on, but still.
His channel still profits from underprivileged people. I think most people would agree that philanthropy shouldn't be about antics and charades.
I know you brought up Logan Paul and KSI, but this team up really shows up as a red flag.
Mr. Beast misled his fans with giveaways and crypto. It's a minor issue at this point, but there is proven video evidence.

It's a nice thing Jimmy is trying to do for society, but the way he has always done it is weird. There are worse people in the world I guess. His is driven by money and money alone. He doesn't care about much.

He begged for his job to harass more woman, the reason he was fired was because of sexual harassment

@@NexusNex01 It's literally hearsay. They could, you know, show us all the HR complaints they have on him?

@@NexusNex01 They literally show nothing as proof of sexual harassment. All Soggy has is a recording of his HR firing meeting. That is it. Nothing else.

is this the adults in our country? ngl y'all should not vote


Thanks for having balls and using your platform to dethrone liars. All this bs is just a cash grab. I never trusted dogpack from the start. Mr beast is very overworked and young. Hes bound to make a mistake. Try being the biggest youtuber in the world with 2 food companies and having to run all of them. You wont be perfect.


Did this thing get 200k more views in 2 hours?


I can’t wait for asmongold to watch this


And that’s when it was the time when the official civil war of YouTube started <br>With mrbeast soggy cereal Logan Paul KSI and others went to war with dog pack 404 Rosana morePegasus and and other commentary YouTube channels and ludwig AND twitter of course

And that’s when it was the time when the official civil war of YouTube started
With mrbeast soggy cereal Logan Paul KSI and others went to war with dog pack 404 Rosana morePegasus and and other commentary YouTube channels and ludwig AND twitter of course

Nah man. Commentary channels are vultures in the ecosystem. Don’t expect any loyalty in them.

nobody cares about commentary channels and ludwig😂😂✌✌😭😭


Make a video about Rossana or whatever her name is. She was always making cooking or baking videos now she is trying her best to expose Mr.beast


In summarion this is really stupid video that seeks to dismiss claims based on technicallities and, perhaps deliberately, misses the point completely.
0:37 «The philanthropy that benefiting millions of people» this is absolute horseshit
4:18 The allegation is that they were joking that he couldn’t go back to Delaware, not that it was the actual origin of the nickname, and certainly not that he was banished by law.
5:57 Even if he didn’t hire him knowing, he sure KEPT HIM AROUND while knowing. That’s the meat of the accusations, your brushing it of.

you didn't watch the video, you watched the first 5 minutes

@@ArbitraryUsername12 the rest of the video gets worse and worse

0:37 Why is it horseshit do you think he does no philantrophy?
4:18 The allegation is that they were joking??? How is that an allegation?
5:57 This still shows dogpack didn't do proper research, besides how do you know whether they kept him around or not?


dogpack has definetly done worse shit than jimmy, but don't idolize either.


A brief comment about "no doesn't always mean no." Don't forget -- women can be creepy too. Even though a female employee thinks it's funny and appropriate, it's definitely not. I also think it's also a red flag of the culture at the company.

lol, my thoughts exactly. I've been selling credit cards and crap my whole life and never heard anyone mention the "no doesn't always mean no" tactic. If I told this tactic to my boss, she would look at me differently.


Dogpack audio recordings are AI-generated, you can TELL if you worked with AI generated audio before


This is getting almost too sloggy for me


soggy get a new  webcam dude  those video calls were horrendous


Leaving a comment on this epic video for algorithm BOOM


So did mr beast pay you well 2000 air fares what else did you get from mr beast

@@MrFather4000if he isn’t being biased then why not disclose that the ticket was paid for until someone asked? Even then he reluctantly answered! If he had disclosed this from the start I’d be more likely to believe this to be an unbiased video but he hid it and his reluctance to answer is sly


54:19 all you need to see is the misuse of the comma instead of a period.  I declare this man and all of his past or current coworkers guilty.


This was a great video, I really enjoyed how thorough it was. Super scummy stuff all around.

One thing that I thought was a little bit funny in an otherwise serious video was at 1:22:00 he speaks about Mr. Beast team actively aging up their content. I am pretty sure Mr. Beast content has not been aged up.


even if mr beast is innocent in theses stuff he still sucks for other things like Lunchly for starters<br>and no i haven't watch the video yet, but i will eventually for now tho i got my own stuff toy do

even if mr beast is innocent in theses stuff he still sucks for other things like Lunchly for starters
and no i haven't watch the video yet, but i will eventually for now tho i got my own stuff toy do


Update: Soggy condemned Mr. Beast's scummy practice of sharing the former's vid to other creators.


Gods I miss content cop

I don't trust Rosanna Pansino as far as I can throw her simply because she seems to have this Mr beast hate boner and she will echo any accusation about that man regardless of whether they are true or false. She could hear a false fake rumor that Mr beast was sleeping with a 13-year-old child and she would echo it as if it was true!


This person is going to single-handedly save MrBeast reputation

False he is not defending mr beast either have you watched the full video


ok now wheres the video showing the shit ro has been gagling about mr beast and logan for the past few months for views


53:30 is the absolute dumbest argument ever. Of course there would be producers or technicians who trigger it remotely.

Even on real game shows this is the case because it's easier to rig up, wont sustain any damage, such as rust that makes it impossible to turn, or god forbid an emergency happens, you can't expect the dude drowning to release himself.

Even before this video i thought it was a stupid claim to make. Also NDA lol


Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.


How much of this all of a sudden glazing of beast belongs to the company?


TL;DW - They both suck as everyone already knew but one sucks on a small scale and the other sucks on a large scale.


I remember watching the old Mr beast videos  and remember garrett I was wondering what happened to him


Ok so how would people not know what a best buy is

soggy is from europe, i dont think they have best buy there


23:27 IIRC that car with a jet on it has a video on youtube showing the build process


38:30 To be fair, he probably only took home $750k.
Anyone could blow that in a weekend.  😎


I'm always said at start of his "expose" video come out that all of his accusation didn't had any solid proof
but people won't care because Mr.Beast is big and he is evil now so everyone don't even care to look this up even a lot of Youtuber make video about Mr.Beast gonna end his career.

I saw more than bunch of "Content Creator" try to accuse Mr.Beast for making money but they farming from Mr.Beast for money too , ironically enough LMAO


Some people are really blinded by their loyalty. Can't believe how many people in the comments still defend dogsack.


Great video. Great way to spend my evening watching this.


Wtf is going on anymore with this situation


Gee who would of thought scripted videos would be safe 🤦🏼


8:20 not convinced on the fence with this guy...


Soggy Cereal can't be talking, he literally steals other people's thumbnails. Regarding Feastables and Hershey's, you pointed out that Feastables is still healthier than Hershey’s. However, my argument was that it was advertised as healthy, and the downgrade in healthiness wasn’t acknowledged.

Soggy Cereal is twisting my words in order to make himself look correct. I will be making a full debunk soon.


Who cares about the racoon? 😭<br>Besides, that point barely went anywhere, DogPack was literally just speculating

Who cares about the racoon? 😭
Besides, that point barely went anywhere, DogPack was literally just speculating


Soggy isn’t working with MrBeast, allegedly.


whats up with the friendly fire lol isnt this suppose to be everyone against the trio


oh look a fake none fact checked video about another video with checked facts great work ... said no one ever

@@charade3331 probably a child or a man child


Someone has to work on the damn content force.


No he wasn't.  He was right, but for the completely wrong reason.


6:09 Alright so if Delaware isn’t his real name then where did Delaware get his nickname from? Also I don’t remember Delaware being printed on that shirt and bro why did you forget the part where the intro is sped up when when you tried to debunk the 10 minute real time vid? Clearly the timer WAS EDITED in post and the guy touched the laser dogpack404 made those claims and you skipped them (I bet this guy got paid by Mrbeast)

The DogPack glazing is insane  😭

3:49 Literally, Jake says that Delaware got his nickname from the fact that his crimes were committed in Delaware. Jake Weddle, the guy on DogPack's side.

6:08 Dawg, can you not read?

Also, why would Soggy admit that Jimmy committed an illegal lottery if he was paid to make the video? You're just pushing the false narrative that Soggy made this video to defend MrBeast instead of exposing DogPack.

@@AmazingMarioPlushFilmsat 53:06 soggy nosed the worst attempt at debunking dogpack’s claim the timer is obviously edited in post


dogpack is syndrome and Mr beast is Mr incredible if he was a crypto scammer lmao


Why doesn’t this one have 15 million views?

because it has literally nothing of substance in it whatsoever and a good 2/3 of the video is stupidity

@@manachromeYT I guess exposing famous people is more trendy than defending them.


I respect you but as all things are always the answer lies somewhere in the middle.


Nor soggy, dogpack404 or mrbeast are telling the truth

@dihydrogenmonoxideistasty340  No but its clear that dogpack and Mr beast are lying and soggy is using words in a way that defends Mr beast (saying confirmed for dogpack but allegedly for Mr beast) and that gives me a feeling soggy is also lying

@@zeenxdownz"giving you a feeling" yea sure dude

@@FinalWarsGoji What are you trying to say? The way soggy talks gives me a feeling in my gut that makes me feel like he is spreading misinformation aswell


Crazy dogpack doesn’t even try and respond😭😭😭


I had doubt back when the original video by dogpack was posted in july.
Here is my comment from his video:

"The fact that y'all are taking this at face value from a guy who couldn't even manage to stay in the job for 2 months is so hilarious.
99% of this dudes accusations have literally ZERO proof. Its just accusations from some random loser.

Hell, there's a bunch of claims in it that have been outright proven wrong in videos, streams and podcasts that came out long before this video."


yo wtf did't notice you were dutch untill the screenshots at 1:03:42


is it sad that I actually fell for this crap.....like Dogpack was giving jelly...

You believe Soggy Cereal? He steals other thumbnails and doesn't give credit. I am going to be debunking this soon.

@@DogPark404<br>Soggy cereal doesn't steal thumbnails you are just making things up to protect you online reputation

@@DogPark404
Soggy cereal doesn't steal thumbnails you are just making things up to protect you online reputation

@@DogPark404 you lied about a heart warming anime, about CP, and about scamming children boy bye, Jimmy might be shady but he ant CRIMALLNALY shady at least like that....


bro getting paid by Mr Beast and interviewing loyal dogs of Mr. Beast

42:31 Actually watch the video before you comment

@@hydro1389 The rest of the video proves otherwise.

@@SpearSilver you assumed otherwise ,your problem


I feel like you thanos snapped to 250k subs last time I checked you had like 20k lol congrats


As a person who believed this man’s lies and made me think Mr Beast was a bad man after this video I have realized that he is a manipulative, spiteful man who tricks his audience and boasts himself when he is right and cry’s when he is crying like a child. I was subscribed after this video I unsubscribed from Dogpack404. I agree with Soggy Cearel and I am glad he changed my brain from Dawson and agree either every word Soggy Cereal says thank you man.


dogpack404 likes to perfectly cut stuff and take EVERYTHING OUT OF CONTEXT.

@@starwinter6845 as someone who litterally watched the whole entire video, i can litterally confirm that he did not take anything out of context and you are a person who does not think of any sort of common sense once so ever. more at the end of the video, he INTERVIEWED employees that are to this day still working at the company, and they told there storys about dogpack404 being an absolute asshole, like trying to get an apple vision pro out of the company, and calling the food that the people working there trash without having any sort of interaction, and in a rude manner all on purpous.

i think you should watch the video actually before assuming he is lieing. This is probably the longest video on the situation that fully explains almost everything.


3:12 Becuse of ksi & logan all mrbeast did is feastebals


Cant wait for pegasus to make bangers like 🔥
Its over
Dogpack exposed
The end
Its finally over
It got worse


Ah i already see the dogpack riders in here trying to debunk


0:42 "active philantropy that helps millions"
<.< yet Mr beast still hasnt paid the doctors for the eye surgeries he said he paid for.

honestly. all i see in this video is people saying things about dogpack and weddle, without evidence.
least Dogpack provided the receipts.

But he did provide receipts, thats this video, MrBeast is not a good guy, everyone agrees with that, its just that DogPack404 is not a reliable source or really a good guy at all.

Wym? This dude provided more receipts than Dogpack.

you havent watched the full video have you, you literally watched 42 seconds and left this comment. he literally coveres the eye doctors later in the video


If Mrbeast stop collabing with Logan Paul i will support him again🙄


18:20
literary watching this with sharp edges on chrome, windows 10 you dummy


To who? Proof? What are you suggesting, Beast paid him off or something?

It's been obvious from the start that Dogpack has been lying and manipulating, regardless of if his overall message about Beast is true or not. It is not at all shocking that someone is finally bringing to light what people didn't want to see.

Thinking for yourself is apparently being a sellout..;


14:15 it's not because it's a joke that it's not true


The War crime comment is tongue in cheek. It's clearly demonstrating that these challenges are excessively harsh. This is <b>exactly</b> what has been evidenced in the New York Times' reports on Mrbeast's new show

The War crime comment is tongue in cheek. It's clearly demonstrating that these challenges are excessively harsh. This is *exactly* what has been evidenced in the New York Times' reports on Mrbeast's new show


I mean, did anyone think the war crime thing was serious? Obviously, the Geneva Conventions don't apply. Jake wasn't a convict, and there is no war. I don't understand how anyone could perceive this as hyperbole. This felt like nit picking. Jake Weddle was financially coerced into submitting to harassment and mental distress. You can't arrest a person or company for committing war crimes, but this conduct is pursuable in a civil case.

"Financially coerced" Nice anti-concept. In the reality we live in, no one is free from necessity. Trade is not coercion.

@ Legally,  definitely not coercion. But arguably it is hard to say no because of the financial incentives that were offered. I personally believe that there is a strong ethical transgression in using incentives like this. Maybe I was overzealous in the implication that this exact conduct is legally perusable. It largely depends on what sort of liability was signed ect. I doubt that this will be taken to court. But I think the legal issue is there, and certainly the ethical one, likewise.


42:54 doobus goobus didn’t ride dog packs meat?


Mr Beast approves this message and will send cash immediately

"Finally! A video that doesn't spread baseless slander about me lol" -mrbeast's deleted comment on this video


Idk 8 min also sound like the guy is trying pull back his statements


wonder what now the other suckers of content such as MorePegasus gonna said now 🤣


Morality question I have to ask as a philosophy major is do you feel good about making someone who was shown as an evil person (MrBeast) now seem less evil because you exposed dogpack? You could’ve kept hidden this information you had and kept MrBeast as a super evil person.

What a dumb question, should all people who were falsely imprisoned for crime , not have people still try to prove their innocence because the public believes they are evil? That’s how dumb you sound


47:19 OK yeah that alone is a huge red flag.


1:14:26 that’s not Jakes friend. That’s a leech.


hmmm you remind me of dani for sum reason


I mean ye obiviously its not war crime.. Tho its torture.. Voluntary torture but then again offering money to torture someone on camera is morally wrong.


42:46 bro I don't wanna assume but I think the bottom comment is by a bot


If all of this is true then why couldn’t Mr beasts lawyer use the stuff you’re saying to refute it when the drama first started. I’m not saying you’re wrong or anything but that is a little suspicious on your part

Because the refutation of all those points does not matter. At the end of the day Beast was doing too well for too long, people hate that and are just searching for a reason to justify their feelings. When a huge wave like that builds up you are not stopping it with logic, you have to wait it out and then try to explain later(thats why 99% of time the best response anyone can make to a drama is no response). Of course there is still some shitty stuff beast did, but all things included he is not even in top 100 terrible big youtubers.

You can see it even under this video: people just go "oh so the person that we were worshipping just a week ago is actually manipulative pos who is trying to get vengeance, well w/e I still hate Beast" and find some other reason to be angry.

Coming back to your point of them not suing: think about the optics of suing dogpack right now, people would just cry that a massive company is abusing its financial power to punish a whistle blower. But if they don't sue "why don't they sue him if he lies". And it just goes on and on. If he responds it doesn't matter (I explained why), if he doesn't he is guilty, if he sues he is guilty, if he doesn't sue he is guilty. The ONLY answer is not to answer lol.

sorry for the rumbling I was bored lol

cause hes been researching, unlike dogpack to make sure his facts are correct


1:01:47 It's no NYC, but at least it's not Kansas!!!!


Just leaving a comment to help push this video in the algorithm


Pansino and Dogpack should be sued and investigated for slander and libel


I think if you're going to nitpick slip-ups like Dogpack forgetting to say "alleged" one time and Jake Weddle only stating that a voice recording is AI after showing it, you should avoid that kind of misleading behaviour yourself.
(29:30, you claim you are now going to submit the FBI report and animate a mouse cursor clicking on it and then later go "uh also, I didn't actually submit it")

I think if you're going to nitpick slip-ups like Dogpack forgetting to say "alleged" one time and Jake Weddle only stating that a voice recording is AI *after* showing it, you should avoid that kind of misleading behaviour yourself.
(29:30, you claim you are now going to submit the FBI report and animate a mouse cursor clicking on it and then later go "uh also, I didn't actually submit it")

I don't think you get it. That point of that was to show how submitting an FBI report against someone doesn't mean that person's guilty.


Ridiculous how many creators all these horrible accusations went through before ANYONE did any fact-checking. Content creators are so fucking lazy nowadays


Cute how Jimmy hired this guy to try and undo his crimes, we all know Jimmy is a criminal

Hey, maybe watch the video instead of making a dumb comment


idk man you didn't change my mind on Dogpack even if he's biased and has errors in his reporting the things that matter are bad. I don't care someone misrepresented the facts cause it made all the issues in general come out.


Welcome to Trump's New America ladies and gents

This whole situation started before the election results. Try again.

@@redshepherd32 i don't mean by that idiot<br>I mean we are in the beggining of a new era that everything is a lie or AI generated we can't trust anyone

@@redshepherd32 i don't mean by that idiot
I mean we are in the beggining of a new era that everything is a lie or AI generated we can't trust anyone


Idk 8 min also sound like the guy is trying pull back his statements<br>Me all the questions were leading

Idk 8 min also sound like the guy is trying pull back his statements
Me all the questions were leading


I don't know man, I think you're lying<br>Maybe even I am lying

I don't know man, I think you're lying
Maybe even I am lying


those 2.1k dislike are meat riders of dogpack lol


Only one man is sending memes into space. Elon be thy name.


The difference between Soggy and Dawson video is that I feel comfortable with Soggy while Dawson I have uncomfortable cringe feeling

Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.


I'm shocked that no one has sued Dawson for defamation yet


Damn i must be getting old cuz i can see right through this slop of a video.

Its clearly meant for the "mr beast" audience, and i can tell. The exaggerated movements to the loud voice with accent.

 23:27 "it took himMONTHS to build the rocket car" yeah ok buddy it looks like a preschool duct taped a "car" together.

😂

CRINGE.

And you obviously have no experience with engineering.  A car like that isn't easy to make.

@@StrikerEureka13sometimes you gotta accept the fact that some people are just single-celled


I mean isn´t Mr  Beast in the same bitcoin trouble as Logan Paul? So is Coffeezilla lying about all his allegations as well? I feel like this video glossed over some of the real concerns and focused on a few things that no one really cared about. Just the stuff these dudes were grasping at straws for in order to save face. Even if the guy was wrong about a few things it doesnt change Mr Beast is under investigation from actual people who do this for living without the youtube videos. So we will all see what comes of this.


Ehh Mr beast still sucks I thought this drama was over. Milking these views


no you cant criticize mr beast he is giving some of his money to poor people


The guy who says his balls is right about mrbeast is about to get bamboozled

In all seriousness, mr beast is not a  saint but maybe just a normal decent dude, the good thing about this drama is probably people stop over glazing mr beast


Jake is so annoying and unbearable it's unbelieveable. It's like 9/10 "comedians" are trash these days

He's painfully unfunny. It's like he's competing with Def Noodles for the bottom slot.


After watching this I’m realising I’m too stupid to make a decision on this situation 💀


I don't care what you all say, everybody has done bad things but Mr beast has helped more people than anyone in the youtube community, he is not an angel of course but the reason people are hating on him is simple, you can be very clean from top to bottom but if you have a little booger on your nose than your disgusting and no one wants to be around you, so yeah Mr beast has a booger but don't ignore the good stuff also

You also can't just ignore the bad stuff just because its masked by good. It can go boh ways.

You're right in how aggressively people want to tear down Mr. Beast. It's definitely important to notice when wrongdoing is happening, but a ton of people seem to relish his "downfall" because they didn't trust him or etc., so it confirms their suspicions and biases. Like they would rather be "right" for seeing him as manipulative and selfish than for him to actually just be doing good things. And people act like acts of charity are bad if they further someone in the process, when it helps people regardless of the givers intent.

Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago. He was also fully aware of Ava Kris Tyson being a predator...

@@Walrus101 While not inherently bad, acts of charity can certainly be used to cover up bad things. Whether or not it is actually the case, you can't just disregard the possibility just because you want to disprove a few people.

@@Anomity99 ? I'm not at all sure how what you said at the end has anything to do with me. Disprove who? And I specifically said that it is beneficial regardless of intent, and that people can use it for personal gains. Didn't disregard anything, and specifically said it's important to know if there is wrongdoing going on.

?


How did we never see through this, I mean atleast mrbeast isn’t a terrible person, allegedly. Now please don’t be a liar as well because I’m losing my mind right now

Probably because Dogpack took advantage of the Chris 'Ava' Tyson drama to boost himself, Allegedly.


Watch Dogpack404 delete his account. Karma is finally impacting dogpack