Let me just get this right. Why is a guy refuting evidence on behalf of MrBeast? I mean, this just seems weird to me, that this guy randomly begins going to war for MrBeast. Furthermore, Why the heck is MrBeast in this commentsection, like bro, respond to the claims yourself, instead of hiding behind someone else, doing the debunking? Or am i missing something here?

Because he’s an investigative commentary youtuber who loves his job and takes it seriously lol

@@JulieWooly-pn6tx So i'm missing something here? I'm just questioning the exact thing you're doing right now. Arguing on behalf of someone else... Would it not be better, if it came straight from the source?

most importantly, how did he get his hands on most of this "evidence"? mrbeast gave it obviously.

And how so many employees were already postured to answer specific damage-control related questions. Something went on under the table.

@@DavidNorup-up7id Let me just get this right. Why is a guy refuting evidence on behalf of dogpack404?

@@generights Who is? I'm not saying he's clean or anything, i just think MrBeast should respond, since he's in the middel of all this, instead of some random guy on YT, probably being fed information from the MrBeast team indirectly.

because thats his job. hes an investigative journalist youtuber. his job is to do investigations on this stuff whether hes asked to or not. and unlike dogpack he actually takes it seriously.

also soggy probably wouldve done this if dogpack didnt try to make him say alot of baseless accusations for him.

While Mr. Beast SHOULD respond. THIS DOESN'T MEAN UNDER THE HOOD LOL.

Could it be? Sure.... like how Dogpack said everything could "allegedly" be true. However, he spent a lot more time actually LOOKING into his crap and sorting interviews. Did you see the way dogpack talked to him? That's not something an innocent man says

@@PlatinumSceptile Just because it's his job, doesn't mean he's fit to talk on behalf of someone else. That's my hole point. Would it not be better if MrBeast actually responded, rather than responding through some proxy YouTuber? I don't have anything against him (Soggy), and obviously a lot of his debunking has some merrit to it, I'm just curious as to why, MrBeast and his team, if the evidence was so unrefutable wouldn't just respond, instead of feeding this guy information.

@ I hope you watched the video. The only reasons soggy got all the info was because jimmy wasn’t responding. Jimmy didn’t tell his producer to give the info to soggy. The producer just got sick of jimmy not responding so he gave the info to soggy as someone who would actually spread the truth. As to why specifically jimmy isn’t responding despite his employees, friends, and viewers wanting him to? We can only guess.

@ we don’t have to guess an investigation was underway on him so he had to remain silent. Now he should be able to speak unless another investigation occurs


How did you get all these connections? How did MrBeast official channel comment on a video with 244,000 views a day after it comes out? You made it so blatantly obvious that you worked with MrBeast to make this video, MrBeast definetaly paid you to make this slop. Which immedietaly sparks a conflict on interests, now we know why MrBeast hasn't been responding, he was commissioning third party responses, as to not draw attention to the drama for people who were unaware of it, only people who already know about the drama will see this video, where as, if he released a video on his channel, everyone would see it, and more eyes would be put on the drama, very smart.

trust me, there is definitely a random mrbeast working watching every video about the controversy the second it releases, if something came out defending mrbeast, he would know

@@gewnurb Still doesnt answer the question of how he got all those connections, or how he got all of this "leaked" information.

@@a_skellingtonthere are literal mr beast employee in the video (listen I don’t like mr beast either) but soggy cereal is definitely not paid he did a several part series on airrack last year who is beasts friend


@56:30 how do you pocket your own money lol


Half this is just disingenuous and unreasonable at times false corrections, kids gambling is still bad, only finalizing promises due to backlash is still bad, making a poor person do things for the camera and labelling it a war crime then doing an ACtUaLlY doesn't make it any less bad, and unironically shame on you for trying to diminish the real bad that did happen and the lies that were actually spread in mr beast videos


What the frick is even happening at this point


This doesn't feel like a content cop if there's no edgy humour in it.

Still, W video tho


There’s a LOT of things that I didn’t find to be true with dogpack, and Rosanna, (many of which being the “very old” stuff) since both had reason to have bias and anger, but there’s a lot of bad that I do believe to be true.
-philanthropic lies, cgi-reused clips to make look of doing more than done (not much a big deal other than lying), team trees/seas which is technically good, but overall just a big “feeling of helping” than actually helping. And most importantly the recently uncovered not paying of surgery bills, it’s all just done for image than to really be good, “want to be good, go do it NOT for a video” (an extra note that “yes good IS being done, but only the right good for the camera”)
-gambling, I think he has had cases of blatantly promoting/encouraging gambling type behavior, matching his possible own addiction with that and crypto
-items, most of his items have been fine, like toys, they just toys it’s fine… the chocolate was starting to cross the line, and the new recipe crossed it, with lunchly finally being the breaking point as it is blatant copied crap with other YouTubers who are NOT a good image
-some issues with safety which may be more “overdoing it” with the videos/beast games, and not being prepared for what is needed to do something of that scale.
it’s mrbeast’s recent actions that have caused me to stop watching rather than what dogpack “exposed” as I personally dislike many of his collaborations and new personality.


agree with everything besides the signatures, a signature made by another person will never hold the same value as a signature made by the person you value, because signatures are not valued on anything besides the personal value of the person who signed it.


You are ignoring proven things like the fake signatures. Chocolate child Labour and more. Clearly you’re glazing

You clearly didn't actually watch the video, because he DOES talk about the chocolate thing.

6/10 ragebait, watch the video first to get better hate

He didn’t ignore the child labour what are you talking about


1:00:46 of course it devalues the tshirt. the only value in the shirt is if Mr beast himself signed it, which is what people would believe seeing his signature. maybe it's not illegal, but it's definitely scammy


I appreciate your search for the truth Soggy, great video!
I didn't agree with some of the things that were presented; for example the NDAs
Who cares if he broke an NDA? The point he was making is that the challenges (like the underwater one), are not as authentic as they try to make them appear. The potential threat for injury is in part what keeps viewers engaged. So the point is it's not real as they try to depict, which makes it fraudulent in my opinion.

Next, the signing of the T-shirts;  there's no possible way that you could honestly agree with that? Nobody wants a signature from somebody that's not actually that person.  It's disingenuous, it's fake, it's a lie.  I don't care what you read, it's probably propaganda by the print on demand companies when artists sell prints and they claim to be hand signed but it's actually robot CNC machine signing it with a pen or pencil for them. I find it to be a deplorable thing to do.

And regarding Jake Wedel;
Y'all seem to lack an understanding of human psychology based on the way you presented it. Comparing it to the challenge when it was the guy and the girl is nowhere near the same, like at all.
Humans are social creatures, and our powerful brains require other humans (aka culture) to guide our actions so we know how to properly orientate ourselves in the world.
Complete and total isolation is definitely psychologically challenging to say the least, and to deprive that brain of sleep at the same time?! That is definitely psychological torture.

 However, I do think he has no ground to stand on because it was all voluntary. That being said, he probably has a personality type that is high in trait agreeableness, which would coincide with his self proclaimed feeling like he had no choice.

Keep doing what you do Soggy because the truth is an antidote to a lot of people's suffering. 💯🙌


first allegations video that isn't slop, about time


So you are not gonna talk about the video you deleted for spreeding fake information about WestJett. How you went behind youre friends back and made a negative video about them while they are supporting you. Man milked AirRack and now is the peack of Slop. Yayyyyyyyyyy. Well made Soggy.

Pegasus is a clown and this is a completely different subject

@@DontkilLkong Pegasus is a clown? Soo soggy spreads false information about a supporting friend, calls him a slop channel, and he is the clown? I don't care that this is a different subject this is the following video after he deleted the last one, a explanation should be needed. Why are you defending him?

@ Pegasus knowing spread False allegations and soggy only deleted the video because of other YouTubers NOT Pegasus Pegasus is a huge clown and deserved the criticism

@ what about soggy criticizing Pegasus was false Pegasus is a low effort slop and milking drama channel that gets things wrong a lot watch stuckys videos on megasus

doesn't make his video any less credible lol

@@DontkilLkong Its not criticizing if your telling lies. And Pegasus did not spread any false allegations, the video was about him milking the Mr. beast drama. What false allegations? I would rly like to know. And yeah soggy deleted the video, and what other youtubers, WestJett? Did you even watch his video, Pegasus was inn it and defended him self. What are you talking about, and pls tell what false allegations Pegasus was saying.

@ soggy deleted it because of other YouTubers not Pegasus

@ Pegasus did no effort and dicrided dogpack

@@DontkilLkong I just told you the "other" youtubers was WestJett and Pegasus was a part of it. And why aren't you telling me the allegations Pegasus spread, is it because there aren't any? And you made it up? Pls you aren't making any sense.

@ READ THE FUCKING it says he unfairly criticized OTHER CREATORS BRO

@@jakovnenadovic7189 thé  false charity faking and fbi report


Imagine someone comes out and makes a video about Soggy Cereal lying and being a fraud


Idubbz died 2022 soghy cereal born 2022. Welcome back idubzz


Dogpack404 is evil. I can feel it in my balls


Imma be real even with this situation, i'm still gonna hate on mr beast anyway

Thats the point of this. Show that dogpack is stupid. and not say that mr beast didn’t do anything wrong


That yacht looks like it sunk then got revived


54:22 again, the whole premise of the video was that they were engaging in a risky activity, and whisking away to safety behind the scenes makes your audience believe you were in a much larger risk than you actually were. aka faking

i dont think anyone woudda been happy if they died or they were forced to stay on in dangerous conditions. People talk abt their dangerous conditions as a big thing

@@RihanaLinthey should've just mentioned in the video that they're stepping out due to risky conditions rather than mislead viewers

@@Thebeast_QwQ yeah I was abt to say, but I agree with u mentioning that


You know what? I'm no longer believing any accusation against any Youtuber, EVER. Nope.

Normally I wait for docs or whatever to leak or release, then judge from there. Nope, I'm just gonna assume they're ALL crafted up to slander, or have context spliced out, or other faking tricks.

Nope, I'm not believing a single allegation no matter how solid the evidence looks, since it will likely turn out to be overdone dogpiling hoaxes.

I don't watch or support him. Still won't. But, just, no, I'm done with this year of accusing.


@@drak_darippaThat's a nice argument senator Got any source to back it up?

"My source is I made it the fuck up"

You're no better than the fools

There's concrete evidence in this video, if you even watched it with your ears open

And I ain't siding with anyone, y'all are so pathetic

Dogpack Rider


I swear I had a slight feeling they were lying bcs rosanna pansino is the most obsessed mrbeast hater ever  and way back then she would make false accusations

I've seen DogPack404 in videos with Rosanna Pansino that aren't related to the MrBeast controversy (like baking together). It seems like they are either close friends or FWB. Could be understandable if this was true, they both hate MrBeast.


54:00 that's literally part of the challenge. even if it's for safety, they still faked it. if it's unsafe maybe don't do it or don't say it's real

Just because they had a good reason to fake it doesn’t mean it wasn’t faked


so you only debunked minor stuff, the obvious bait cp stuff (useless american slander) and barely debunked any of the other major mrbeast shady stuff brought up and talked about by dawson such as beastgames, shady selling/lottery methods, behaviour and hiring at the company, while at the same time acting like you're inbetween and just exposing both dogpack and mrbeast. how did you get the audio of dogpack being fired? how is it that youve been welcomed with open arms at the company and were able to interrogate some of the most important members EXCLUSIVELY on dogpack and the weddle stuff, but you couldnt ask them anything about the serious allegations made about the company? mrbeast even commented on the video and you go as far as saying dogpack should be sued for defamation lmao, deffo shady shit going on, you probably argued with dogpack and have been on him to try and eat off every forced accusation he's made (yes he has forced accusations but that doesnt change the fact he's been one of the first by far to expose much of the sh1t going on behind the scenes) and you're probably collaborating with the beast team which has been tyring to slander dogpack in every way possible even hiring private investigators (you are playing perfectly in the role by lying on him being untrustworthy when the majority of the claims he made, especially the fundamental ones, are indeed backed up by evidence, and when they arent he takes accountability for it) to diminish his credibility.

actual sad shit, and you got all the other sheep in the comment actually believing ur bs graph of false accusations which makes it seem like youve just shown them all on the screen while you're only listing absolutely minor points of barely any relevance 🤣
what journalism lmao, this is a sh1tshow

also the part where you claim he has a mrbeast obsession is the vilest shit ive seen in a while. you're not a "controlled" response to dogpack, you mrbeast's response to dogpack

Yapping about nothing And coping also how was the CP minor ??????????????

I’m pretty sure this video is about dogpack

Almost everything here is in his video cope

@@DontkilLkong how is the CP relevant? He mentioned it being dropped on the group chat, not mrbeast possessing it directly. His critique was of the the working space and various creeps in it (which there isn't any shortage of lol, ava Tyson, locoya, take into account adderal being thrown around lmao)

Also idgaf abt what they sent to each other informally, I care only about actual scum practice and abuses, such as adderall, locoya, illegal and shady lotteries and sale tactics, beastgames, ecc.

All other claims is just additional irrelevance, and not by chance this "soggy" goofball only covers those lmao, irrelevant takes

@@Plt193 CP is a CRIME and a big one at that the question is how is it NOT relevant

@@Plt193 cope with the truth And dont Forget to watch the videos

@ you didn’t even watch Rosanna pansino’s video let a lone this

@DontkilLkong  are you a 12 fapping to mrbeast videos or what 😆


I just realized that a dog is the evolution from a beast


I sure hope this guy doesn't get a 304 girlfriend, lame tattoos, a p3do mustache and throws his fanbase under the buss just so he can get acceptance from the far left


please talk about lunchly and prime. (mrbeast promoting both and they're shit)

Lunchly is just YouTuber lunchables and everybody knows that they’re bad and Prime has been out for long enough that if you don’t have an opinion on it by now it doesn’t matter to you.


I came to this video very sceptical, but it did convince me to the point of unsubscribing to dogpack. HOWEVER, I also won't be taking the Mr. Beast employees at their word, my point in this is the Kara part when they talk about "no does not mean no".

She talks about how you can bring solutions to whatever problem working partners may have to not work with what Beast wants to so, when what's written is completely different.

What's written is saying to go around and find someone withtin the same company that they can more easily "manipulate" with talks about how they can tell their children they were in a Mr Beast video or are fans themselves. Even going as far as to push to managers. And that's what she is saying she wrote with Jimmy.


I like how everyone had a different red flag for dogpack, but everyone just ignored the biggest from the start

He was on weed when he made that video, doing drugs is already a massive no no in my view, i honestly trust no one who does that, and making a video that should have been heavily researched while high is just, not a good look

I am someone who hates the idea of doing drugs, smoking, or even drinking, so when i hear that someone made a video like that, while high, it just makes me not want to watch it


I began questioning dogpacks credibility after his video with rosanna where he used a really shady thumbnail


Drama isn`t form me, I`m gona watch my history and science fun facts videos now. Bye!


mrbeast is a horrible person. tired of these beast sympathizers and deniers. stop spreading f@ke news lil bro.

Is your brain that stupid to think if most of dogpack's allegations are false, and dogpack has been manipulative, then mr. beast must be good. How about the fact both can be scummy? Life isn't black and white.


why u dic riding mr beast? both of them are scumbags (kris the degen tyson, getting kids hooked on gambling, real pump and dump crypto fruad are real hard truths. you cant hand wave that away)......also back to making slop?werent you crying about everyone making mr beast videos. wow very original! its different when you do it right?

Coffeezilla literally debunked the pump and dumb scams being scams and stucky debunked the gambling stuff months ago

It’s wild you’re comparing soggy making 1 1h30min long video with all new information, high effort investigating, flying to the US for interviews … with braindead slop channels who just repeat the same misinformation over the span of like 20 stretched out videos. Get a brain 💀💀

He's dickriding him becuase he is fighting back Dogback's various claims? He's not saying Mr.Beast is good. Its just that most of Dogback's claims against him are largely untrue.

@@matjp99 why would mr beast pay a random dude to debunk dogpack?

@@matjp99 yeah but why would mr beast pay a random dude and not a famous youtuber with more than 1 million subs?


NEW PEGASUS VID "ive made a mistake" or "DOGPACK WAS LIEING 1!@#"


42:40 I mean look at ludwig
he got bullied by the entire internet for just not picking a side


yeah man because the mrbeast employees are completely honest

I mean the part about him pathetically begging for his job lines up pretty well


53:13 - you can fucking see that the person is sped up in the video. you guys both have 0 journalistic integrity, jesus christ 😭


dude had one good video and it went to his head. having a dude crying about being a "warcrime" room while making....$416 dollars AN HOUR! in a day of doing nothing he made more than i did in 3 months of waiting tables! and he was acting like a wimp. his greed kept in that room, he could leave at any time. anyone want to pay 10k  a day to sit in a room?


bro thought thought a billion dollar company was gonna give him a second chance after fucking up 3 weeks in? an then tried to discredit them? this should have been obvious that he was lying


One thing, you kinda became a hypocrite by bashing Jake for only telling them that it was ai generated after the clip but then you said that you didn’t actually report them to the fbi after you showed that you filed the report. To be fair it is in the middle of the video though.

Soggy reporting them to the fbi was literally meaningless, jake playing an entire defamatory recording on mrbeast is completely different, what is this take?


amazing video!! how you uncovered all this and actually backed it up is incredible 😮 watched it both on luhrix’s and nicholas deorio’s streams. this video makes me want to go to shower jimmy with as much support as possible! everything that came out just makes him seem like a good guy. think imma go sub.


I wonder if dogpack gonna hit a "guys this was a social experiment" at the end of the 3rd vid or on another like min long vid after that

"I tried to cancel and uncancel myself on the internet" would be a fire mrbeast video ong


with AI voices nowadays, dont believe any of it, from either side.

I've seen someone deep fake me on Daddy D as revenge porn. Dudes got a massive member so i dont get what their revenge plan was.

"Yeah here's his nudes" shows a deep fake of me on a porn star with a massive member

me "yeah thats me, with a 10" Johnson. Its true, i am that shredded too."

What i DO find funny is Jimmy hasnt spoken about any of these accusations in a video, addressed the media issues, the pdf stuff... but has time to comment on videos defending him within a few hours of it going up. Check bellow, he's there. I dont even need to look, he's in the comments of most "Mr best is innocent" videos.

with AI voices nowadays, dont believe any of it, from either side.

I've seen someone deep fake me on Daddy D as revenge porn. Dudes got a massive member so i dont get what their revenge plan was.

"Yeah here's his nudes" *shows a deep fake of me on a porn star with a massive member*

me "yeah thats me, with a 10" Johnson. Its true, i am that shredded too."

What i DO find funny is Jimmy hasnt spoken about any of these accusations in a video, addressed the media issues, the pdf stuff... but has time to comment on videos defending him within a few hours of it going up. Check bellow, he's there. I dont even need to look, he's in the comments of most "Mr best is innocent" videos.


cant wait for pegasus to make 64 videos about this


The dislikes are the DogPack fans coping


Even though Dogpack is a fraud, Jimmy still has to own up for the other deceptive tactics he employs at MrBeast. Also, I’m 99% certain that MrBeast comment is not coming from Jimmy himself but rather one of your cronies.


Not even that deep into the whole drama but I found dogpack sus from the very beginning from what I seen, just really manipulative. Sad some actual lifes got destroyed so he gets internet fame. Imma go watch more of your videos and maybe subscribe, good work doing actual research.


Can't wait until this video is inevitably debunked and everyone calls you out as being as much of a fraud as dogpack404.<br>the cycle continues..

Can't wait until this video is inevitably debunked and everyone calls you out as being as much of a fraud as dogpack404.
the cycle continues..

@@arielperez3613what inconsistencies you mean hyperfixating please cope harder

@@DontkilLkong no, like the insane amount of manipulation tactics he used. Maybe you should actually read some comments under this instead of believing what you want to believe 🤨

@ describes dogpack perfectly and also most of the comments are (rightfully)supporting soggy

@@DontkilLkong Soggy no different then MorePegasus


Thank you for making this video. After watching this, I feel ashamed to have believed the dog pack videos so blindly.

No need to be ashamed I didn't believe it because I didn't care till it got into my normal content


WE NEED TO KNOW THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION
.
.
.
.
is the racoon a paid actor?


You're not better than dogpack. It's all a dogfight.


Take me back to 2016 being a teen and watching content cop


Pegasus is about to rub one out to this video 💀🙏


cant wait for morepegasus video about dogpack


I kinda liked dogpack he seemed like a genuine person but i guess I should’ve known by now that anyone can be exposed at any moment


Dogpack's biggest mistake was trying to blackmail a dude who researched and exposed airrack just cuz


Thank you for restoring my faith in humanity because if mrbeast is a satan then there is no hope for us.

Hey, just because Dogpack404 is not all he's cracked up to be, doesn't mean Mrbeast is an angel. I mean, Stalin fought Hitler but that doesn't mean Stalin was good...

@@llamamations8827 Kinda weird conclusion but I understand.


In Conclusion: Don't trust everyone you see online


1:01:48 That’s everywhere except for the places where people are batsh1t insane. Like Texas’ drivers and Florida’s citizens.


It’s not glazing he still shows what mrbeast is at fault for


This drama is like politics there's no good or bad it's just profit


when Dogpack's video dropped i was literally saying to everyone it's 99% bs, but nobody listened and called me a moron xD


Truly baffling how a majority of the internet chose to believe the absurd claims made by a random nobody who suddenly appeared out of thin air, who just so happened to have been fired from MrBeast's company not long before, and not the  most rich and famous man on the platform who has built a squeaky clean reputation and has given so much to others.
2024 has truly exposed our need to take down anything and anyone, if it benefits us.
MrBeast did the right thing being silent all this while.
He knew that we'd eventually figure out that we were put on a wild goose chase.
Truly embarrassing how we found reasons to attack and take down the man who has given so much to YouTube, and devalued his career over a random salty ex-employee.
A lesson to all of us, to never take sides without understanding the full story.

I see quite a few people falling into this ideological trap, and it saddens me that we go in circles. Dogpack404 is certainly not a saint, and has manipulated to push his agenda, but that doesn't mean we should immediately discredit any and every allegation/problem that has backing against Mrbeast. Such as, several Beast Games contestants came out to speak about the inhumane conditions of the show, even some taking up lawsuits against him, AND someone being hospitalised for a week after a concrete piece of set crashed upon them. Not to mention the Lunchly scandals, or the blatant disregard of VERY serious allegations, nor the comment censorship that has been proven to be true many, many times. Both sides are quite diabolical, but to discover that one is bad and presume the other good is dangerous and we have already experienced this by assuming everything and anything Dog said was true. Although Dogpack404 is a manipulative and spiteful person, we still should hold everyone accountable, Mrbeast and Dogpack included, for we would be doing ourselves a great injustice not to.


these drams is the main reason why i live by the rule and i quote "there are 2 things in this world there are 2 thing in this world the one that our eye can see and the one our eye cant see and it is better if we do not know what our eye can see'' quote from a wise man

we cant just blindly trust anything


Hey quick question. So I’ve looked on the feastibles website and where they should say “exploitation free” on the website as stated on the Tony website, there is none of that found, with myself only finding that it’s definitely free of child labor, never once talking about slave labor. Now, I could be looking in the wrong place but here’s is what the mobile version of the website says about their ethical sourcing:

“WHAT IS FEASTABLES' ETHICAL SOURCING STRATEGY?
-
Feastables’ Ethical Sourcing Strategy seeks to get West African children out of farms and into schools. The Strategy is being actioned in three ways:
· Helping farmers and their families earn a living income.
· Investing in local communities, in children’s education and their wellbeing.
· Ensuring farmers have access to skilled and mechanized labor to successfully operate their farms, without child labor.
We’re working on a number of projects in West Africa. Watch this space – there is much more to come!”

I hope I’m wrong on this, but if this is true it could imply Feastible’s may utilize slave labor, despite your claims. If someone could help clarify it would be greatly appreciated!


I used to watch GARRET in mr beast videos!


Animal abuse prevention man is back and popular!


Delaware got confirmed by jake the viking tho that jimmy knew about him being registered when hiring him tho...

Why should anyone trust him when he never brought up his brother before hand. Hes another bad faith actor against mr beast.


47:58 I didn’t get an ad. I am convinced 2x speed removes ads except from the start and end of videos. Which is good for the viewer but not good for the YouTuber who isn’t getting mid roll ad money or watch time since that gets halved.


the idubbz reference brought back so many memories lol


This video just proves HBomberguy's point about Drama YouTube being the worst side of YouTube.


At this rate ludwig will react to all the mr beast lore to become a pro


What? Its just an ordinary Mr Beast dra- OH MY GOODNESS!


But Mr Beast did leave the lights on during the challenge, which is a war crime, didnt he?


Dawson is hurting the philanthropy thats helping people? Like fiming a bunch of people who were already getting eye surgury? 1 or 2 Mrbeast videos probably cost as much to produce as his whole company has spent on both team trees and team seas


now YOU'RE gonna get exposed, then the person who exposes you is gonna get exposed


11:13 seeing my country just made me feel super sad, when will it end!!


theres a youtube channel called shantaechilek and their putting makeup on their dogs for views :[


Dogpack and Mr Beast are still both bad, I don’t think anyone being investigated by coffeezilla and also having a 20 page lawsuit against him is much of a “good person” either

However I appreciate the journalistic integrity you have to still come out against dogpack even while it may be controversial or a hot topic 👏


HELL YEAHHHH OTIS MCDONALD MENTIONED🗣🗣🔥🔥


I think im not gonna support either Dogpack or MrBeast at this point. 💀


<b>DogPack404</b> - such convenient of a name he chose for a channel that literally is the literal embodiment of a dogpack.

*DogPack404* - such convenient of a name he chose for a channel that literally is the literal embodiment of a dogpack.


been saying this for months lol, the first video was simply a bunch of unsubstantiated accusations and nonsense to add to the "illegal" lotteries thing which in itself was just an inexperienced mrbeast that didn't know about free entries, every other video after it is just a more and more desperate beg for clout


Journalism is a maze, packed with propaganda at every turn. I thought Dogpak’s reporting was the untouchable gold standard of unbiased truth—only to have it shattered by another video. Now, I’m convinced this video is the epitome of unbiased work. Am I stuck in some kind of twisted loop?!


soggy cereal zip up his pants when ur done bro


Dog pack, Mr beast... Funny... Nr beast fakes his video.. everybody knows that now even bro didn't deny..and isn't dogpack the dude that used to work for Mr beast... He got fired and decided to expose them touche... Maybe they are actually both doing this for views.. remember how much kim Kardashian made from her tape just leaking


Soggy cereal tries try not to Dick ride MrBreast challenge, IMPOSSIBLE

Watch the video little bro, he isn’t glazing mr beast.


1:01:58 "I had a lot of time to think and watch Minions." Nobody willingly watching Minions is capable of thought.

1:01:58 _"I had a lot of time to think and watch Minions."_ Nobody willingly watching Minions is capable of thought.


he didnt interupt the ceo the ceo stopped tlaking so he talked lo lfirst time eyah he interuptted but second time he didnt lol. Also if a ceo is being a douche u can itnerupt them if u want if u in a job interview and boss is a douche be a douche back  dogpack a clown but that intro was weird.


For anyone wondering about the “Forging signatures“; MrBeast SPECIFICALLY said MULTIPLE TIMES that <b>a random person</b> from the team would sign the shirt. Signing „MrBeast“ is not the same as signing „Jimmy Donaldson“

For anyone wondering about the “Forging signatures“; MrBeast SPECIFICALLY said MULTIPLE TIMES that *a random person* from the team would sign the shirt. Signing „MrBeast“ is not the same as signing „Jimmy Donaldson“


i haven't watched the video but this dude at the start has technoblade merch so whatever he says is gosphel


My question is why did this completely unrelated guy debunk a defamation video about a company/person (months after it came out btw)?. It really doesn't make sense to me how it is profitable to not address the allegations. I despised both the man and the company of Mr Beast before the dogpack video and I will no matter because I hate that brainroted content but why did they let that happen 💀they even deleted comments and pretended nothing is wrong like I know the 8 yos don't care and wouldn't understand but even a single tweet would be enough.
edit: 1:20:21 then why diddn't you address the allegations ? 😭That's on you for not standing up for you "beloved" company. What are you gonna do if another dogpack comes out?
edit2: I'm sorry but if folks at MrBest think 40 yos, 50 yos and so on watch their videos they need to take a look at the mirror cuz nobody's buying that crap. Didn't they make a lucnchables clone that was targeted towards who again? Children who don't know better ? but this is dogpack's evil manipulation it's not like they've been targeting children for years right? 😭

because it fucking takes time to research and put the videos together? Do you lack common sense?


if mrbeast was such a terrible person, why didn't dogpack leave instead of getting fired?


Only winner between DogPack and Mr.Beast controversy is Soggy Cereal!!


Jesus christ this situation is getting out of hand


I can finally watch mr beast with less guilt


omg. at this point im skeptical to every “truth” that comes out. so what if mr beast chose paying people to fire back against dogpack404 instead of sitting down and apologizing since we know this doesnt turn out the way intended most of the time for youtubers. it could all be just mr beast propoganda. also him commenting? finally taking accountability only for a video that supports him?? very sketchy. all i know is mr beast isnt a saint and not just a generous charity guy.

@ wdym are you siding with me or the video

@@specticent he's not a saint but why isn't he a generous charitable guy? A 4 sec CGI means his all his videos are fake? Can you prove even HALF of his videos as fake when there's actual evidence people lives have been changed even if for clout? Just because he isn't as charitable as he claimed, doesn't mean he is NOT charitable. He's still doing better than most people ever will. You already claim this is "Mr beast propoganda" so I'm sure where your bias lies. Nobody in this situation is good, mr beast is bad, but dogpack404 is clearly worse.

@KRuStyKxng  the crypto stuff seems pretty bad


I know Ludwig is doing a little two-step in his room right now for not jumping the gun on this 😂


how very different and quirky u are bro!


Strongest Manipulator in History Vs. Strongest Manipulator of Today.


Yo soggy, you should check out the allegations abt mr beast exaggerating his charity in his philanthropy channel (like pretending to build a hospital, building less than 100 wells, etc)


It’s funny because we used to look at people defending Mr. Beast and think they’re immature and now we think that people against mr beast are immature.


babe, wake up! New Mr.Beast intel dropped.


This is great but you should talk about the mrbeast gameshow


I literally said this when the video came out that dogpacks info was literally unconfirmed and heavily edited to seem real and I got slandered for it 😭I literally say in the same msg that I’m not defending mrbeast for all his actions like ppl just wanna be sheep and listen to whatever ppl say.

This is the YouTube mindset
Comment = trash
Video with the same thing = fact and believable


While a lot of his claims were false, chalking the cp memes up as "degenerate humor" is misleading. Where there's smoke, there's fire.


Not wearing helmet while skate boarding.  well this not guy to be trusted. How dumb can you be!!?


BLUD IS the 1,000,000$ lawyer!(or detective)


This vid needs to be linked under every slop vid


bro i dont even know whats true and false anymore about this drama, too much information all at once

@ im a loser but not that much of a loser to research an internet drama that has 0 effect on my life


so you only debunked minor stuff, the obvious bait cp stuff (useless american slander) and barely debunked any of the other major mrbeast shady stuff brought up and talked about by dawson such as beastgames, shady selling/lottery methods, behaviour and hiring at the company, while at the same time acting like you're inbetween and just exposing both dogpack and mrbeast. how did you get the audio of dogpack being fired? how is it that youve been welcomed with open arms at the company and were able to interrogate some of the most important members EXCLUSIVELY on dogpack and the weddle stuff, but you couldnt ask them anything about the serious allegations made about the company? mrbeast even commented on the video and you go as far as saying dogpack should be sued for defamation lmao, deffo shady shit going on, you probably argued with dogpack and have been on him to try and eat off every forced accusation he's made (yes he has forced accusations but that doesnt change the fact he's been one of the first by far to expose much of the sh1t going on behind the scenes) and you're probably collaborating with the beast team which has been tyring to slander dogpack in every way possible even hiring private investigators (you are playing perfectly in the role by lying on him being untrustworthy when the majority of the claims he made, especially the fundamental ones, are indeed backed up by evidence, and when they arent he takes accountability for it) to diminish his credibility.

actual sad shit, and you got all the other sheep in the comment actually believing ur bs graph of false accusations which makes it seem like youve just shown them all on the screen while you're only listing absolutely minor points of barely any relevance 🤣
what journalism lmao, this is a sh1tshow

also the part where you claim he has a mrbeast obsession is the vilest shit ive seen in a while. you're not a "controlled" response to dogpack, you mrbeast's response to dogpack

Then he says stuff like MrBeasts actions are only alleged while dogpacks are confirmed. Like how is that in any way true? Also then brings an employee who has worked for MrBeasts for 5 years saying the recorded conversation was just “water cooler talk” like that was supposed to make it less concerning?

I agree with you, but, like, dogpack still left out some stuff from his video that disproved a few of his allegations. I feel like both dogpack and Mr. Beast are pretty scummy people.

@@DanceFacility dogpack is an ex employee which most likely disagreed on various views on how to run the company and it's creative side / content and got punished for it. Was he fit for the job? Maybe he wasn't the most hard working employee and likely he wasn't in line with the content direction the channel had taken, which probably resulted in him getting fired as he was considered a liability. Considering how some employees and collaborators are treated  (beastgames and the weddle situation are good examples) I wouldn't be surprised at all by his firing being suspicious / questionable.

So the question is, why should we consider dogpack scummy? Because he's a disgruntled employee who got kicked out for having different views from the company direction, and then exposing truths about a good chunk of the scummy nature of the channel?

Losing a job in which he clearly cared about (he was deep into YouTube content creation and mechanism) surely is one of the main reasons why he went on to expose mrbeast, but you also have to consider one of the reasons he was fired is he probably didn't particularly align with much of the scummy practices of the company, which is also one of the other reasons he probably exposed the business.

So refrain from throwing "scummy" around. The only scum I see here is the mrbeast company which hides behind charity to money farm

@@Plt193 so r u gonna ignore the all evidences brought against dogpack's lies, slander and half truth during his brief time to create ur own hypothtical scenario to make you feel good about him slandering mr beast? You saw his video "ideas" yourself and you heard eye witnesses that talk about his charcater not to mention MOST of his allegations are purposely misleading his audiences which proves he not for the truth but himself obviously. Did you watch with understanding? As the prevoius commeneter mentioned, BOTH are SCUMMY. Dogpack isnt a saint who just happened in your dream world to " probably didn't particularly align with much of the scummy practices of the company, which is also one of the other reasons he probably exposed the business. " HE IS SCUMMY TOO. In fact, he should be lucky he isn't getting sued by everyone he dragged in his lies cause he would be done.


wtf i am not sure what to believe anymoree

btw dogpack supports alex jones btw. yehhhh that's a bit of an ouchieee.


if this channel said Dogpack is bad and Mr Beast is also bad, I'd be fine. But this channel is very weird in that Mr Beast is clearly unethical and manipulative, yet this channel tried to use Dogpack and legal loopholes to pretend to exonerate Mr Beast like Mr Beast is still the same old generous guy children should worship.
(edit: I've now seen a few videos doing the same thing uploaded within hours apart, some of which have never even covered the Mr Beast scandal, but now suddenly uploading within hours apart, with similar motive and strategy (expose dogpack while mentioning Mr Beast allegations, so they look like auto exoneration for each Mr Beast scandal). Seems very weird channels that never covered the Mr Beast scandal have full researched videos uploaded hours apart, almost like Mr Beast team handpicked certain channels, but this could be just a coincidence). And unlike 10 minute videos, I saw ones like 30 minutes or 1 hour+ long--how are they uploading all within hours apart... They are even outperforming other channels that just release 10 minute videos. Almost feels like there are certain information they were fed and had to cover.)

A few weird points from this video:
-Delaware is something the employees believed to represent his criminal history, Dogpack is irrelevant to this and even "Delaware" nickname is irrelevant because the key point is employees saying he had the history, so whether the nickname is linked to his history is a small extra detail, not the actual detail. You can erase the nickname from the conversation and affect nothing. They would still be talking about his past history regardless of the nickname.

-The war crime was a spontaneous statement by his friend upon learning about his sleep deprivation just as anyone would easily relate one thing to another but this channel made it like it exonerates Mr Beast. Whether it is legally a war crime does not cancel his actual actions. Example: If you drain your parents money, your friend might just blurt out you're scamming your parents, but technically/legally you're not. It's just the behavior is so bad someone would just use that word. This channel tried to use that to make Mr Beast look innocent when that wasn't the point. If a war crime was the point, then Mr Beast would be in trial. The point was his actions, war crime was just what comes to mind to describe his actions.

-For the illegal lottery, legal semantics and loopholes aside, the motive was clearly unethical and manipulative by Mr Beast. It doesn't matter if Mr Beast managed to do it through legal loopholes because he is being cancelled for his fake generous personality and real manipulative and greedy personality. The motive was obvious and the tactics were obvious. He was definitely manipulative.

Again, this seemed to be Mr Beast propaganda. I'm not going to go through every point which is all full of propaganda. feels like this channel is spreading fake positive Mr Beast propaganda so this channel is ironically also "manipulative".

He criticizes MrBeast some throughout the video, and a lot at the end of the video

He criticizes MrBeast some throughout the video, and a lot at the end of the video

@@cats9994 from my perspective, the amount of criticism he sprinkled in despite the general feeling of trivializing everything feels like a manipulation tactic. The feeling I got was that Mr Beast was being exonerated when watching this video. I should feel the same for both dogpack and mr beast, but they are incomparable. It was not normal to feel this disparity, especially if he sprinkled criticisms. Feels like his tactic to appear impartial, while not.

@@Viewer13128Exactly.  He makes no attempt in mentioning (at least from what I heard) about Jake the Viking making the statement that Mr.beast and his mother were inform about said past and kept him around.

Claims that for the illegal lotteries that there’s supposedly a way to do so on shopmrbeast site but never shows on the wayback machine any evidence of a form to sign(just legal loophole I guess).

@@Viewer13128if this dude was actually super intent on making MrBeast seem like a good guy I do not think he would urge people to watch a video by coffeezilla that discusses MrBeasts potential involvements in crypto scams and state that he thought MrBeast used scummy marketing, he is way more critical of dogpack than he is MrBeast in this video yes, I don't think that's inherently a bad thing? Every youtuber and their fucking grandma has made videos talking about Mrbeast like he's the devil and criticism of Dogpack on this platform is significantly less rare I don't think making a video where you primarily show proof of Dogpack lying his ass off means you actually think MrBeast is super good.

@@Viewer13128Like this guy doesn’t even try disproving the claims for Locoya Hill but rather claim Dogpack just mad that he got fired.

It’s so weird how this video acts

Edit: But Dogpack got the chocolate serving size wrong? Who cares? The point is Mr. Beast claim and act like he’s care about nutrition but then sell BS like Mr Beast burger, Zabaxy deals, Lunchly….. like I feel there’s not enough being neutral about Mr. Beast and Dogpack but rather some bias in there against Dogpack

@@shaquillesommerville4060he literally talks about that at 10:10 his response to that is essentially that Jake The Viking is an untrustworthy moron who isn't a reliable narrator which is a legit fair thing to say imo, when the Kris Tyson shit first started coming to light Jake frequently posted about how Jimmy knew everything Kris did with absolutely 0 proof just for it to be revealed he himself knew his convicted child rapist brother in law once worked there, I don't think coming to the conclusion Jake lied about that to take away heat from him and his brother in law is a crazy conclusion, is it 100% true idk but it's not crazy to think that. Also Jake has frequently defended Delaware as a person lol.

you realize he did criticize MrBeast right? just not as much because quite literally half the stuff DogPack404 even said about him was false, hence theres nothing TO criticize for it on that regard

you realize he did criticize MrBeast right? just not as much because quite literally half the stuff DogPack404 even said about him was false, hence theres nothing TO criticize for it on that regard

@@Karmanara He does criticize but it’s not 100% in the act of pointing out the wrong Mr.beast done within that allegation.

For example, rather trying to debunk the loocay Hills stuff(which is that he work in the adult industry, allegedly SA a coworker, was paid to leave, and transfer to another Mrbeast company), this guy claim that “Oh Dogpack got fired by this dude which is why he’s acting like this.  Which to me seem weird af to argue

@@Karmanara Oh but Jimmy was young and didn’t know background check- but what about Jake Viking the brother-in-law of Delaware confirming both Jimmy and his mom knew about his past and still kept him around?

Oh but the illegal lotteries had a disclaimer.  The description only shown a site to Shopmrbeast.  Where exactly was this form to be enter?

Like there’s a bunch of holes in this video too that just doesn’t actually attempt of being neutral and getting to the bttm of the evidences but rather a bias to make it seem Mr. Beast have an escape goat for his allegation which I just don’t agree with.

also, looking through the wayback machine using the URL he has in the video reveals that the descriptions are different on different snapshot dates, not to mention that there's randomly 8 snapshots taken from oct 15th all of the sudden... idk, occam's razor seems eerily thin here.

Soggy clearly says Mrbeast is bad though. In the illegal lottery section he straight up says “I do believe it is scummy and manipulative marketing though” at around 1:01:34. He never says it that it was generous, he just says it wasn’t illegal.
Edit: it’s about 10 seconds before the timestamp.

YES! Thank you, I feel like I've been looking for this comment. Dogpack clearly has his own motivations for making these and after his second video, he clearly started grasping at straws to keep the drama going, but enough is plainly true that MrBeast is very clearly bad and should be criticized. At most, Soggy Cereal only tries to say vague stuff like "Oh, yeah, I guess he COULD be bad, but we don't know." The Jake Weddle stuff on its own would be enough, and that's basically been proven.

Sure, Jake chose to do it still, but it should never have been compelled by Jimmy in the first place. That marathon he ran could have KILLED him. If we agree that assisted suic*de is ethically wrong, even if the person still chooses it, we should agree that heavily pressuring Jake into performing an action that could kill him or ruin his health because he was desperate for money is just evil.

It's especially disgusting to me how MrBeast is commenting on this video, calling literally of his detractors "slanderers," acting like he's totally in the clear. What he does is wrong and now he may never be properly called out for it

he kinda just points out one fact that dogpack got wrong and or missed and or lied about and makes it seem like everything is bad. also, mrbeast commented so this can easily be a bought out video.

he kinda just points out one fact that dogpack got wrong and or missed and or lied about and makes it seem like everything is bad. also, mrbeast commented so this can easily be a bought out video.

What are you on about? Nothing what you're saying makes sense (and not just because this argument is way too full of word)

And the comments that are criticizing your baseless rambling actually made some good points

What are you on about? Nothing what you're saying makes sense (and not just because this argument is way too full of word)

And the comments that are criticizing your baseless rambling actually made some good points

He did criticize mr beast, its just the focus of the video is on dogpack. There are 5000 videos out there about mr beast.

He did criticize mr beast, its just the focus of the video is on dogpack. There are 5000 videos out there about mr beast.

@Viewer13128 we already know Mr beast is a scumbag for many reasons that are facts this video was more about showing people how "good" isn't always inosent (aka dogpack)

@Viewer13128 we already know Mr beast is a scumbag for many reasons that are facts this video was more about showing people how "good" isn't always inosent (aka dogpack)

@@jojothepig7258 still all along the vid it feels like he's exonerating mr beast by saying that dogpack isn't a trustworthy source so what he's saying isn't really valid, which some are definitely valid. feels like it's even more poisoning the well .

@ he never says that what he’s saying “is not really valid”. He says that what he saying comes into question which is fair. Guilty until proven innocent and when someone cuts out context, makes an entire fake YouTube ui that statement is justified. Also maybe I’m nitpicking here but just because you “feel” like he’s exonerating Mrbeast doesn’t mean he is. Hell even the original commenter does this.<br>Edit: he also confirms one of dogpacks points in the illegal lottery 1 section, he straight up acknowledges and says himself that it was true and should be held accountable.

@ he never says that what he’s saying “is not really valid”. He says that what he saying comes into question which is fair. Guilty until proven innocent and when someone cuts out context, makes an entire fake YouTube ui that statement is justified. Also maybe I’m nitpicking here but just because you “feel” like he’s exonerating Mrbeast doesn’t mean he is. Hell even the original commenter does this.
Edit: he also confirms one of dogpacks points in the illegal lottery 1 section, he straight up acknowledges and says himself that it was true and should be held accountable.

@@intothevoid9831If the focus of the video is on dogpack, why the title only said mr.beast? Destroying dogpack credibility is not the same as uncovering “the real truth about mr beast”

@@intothevoid9831If the focus of the video is on dogpack, why the title only said mr.beast? Destroying dogpack credibility is not the same as uncovering “the real truth about mr beast”

@@shaquillesommerville4060 (Don't know about the Locoya hill and Jake the Viking stuff. I'm only talking about illegal lotteries)

Dogpack's point about the illegal lotteries wasn't that you couldn't enter the giveaway form for free, or that it was extremely hard to enter, his point was that MrBeast never showed that you could enter for free. If the form was hidden/impossible to enter, then Dogpack would've pointed it out. So how the form sign-up process works doesn't really matter since no one ever complained or talked about the form itself.

I'm not taking sides at all. I'm just pointing out that Dogpack and Soggy are talking about whether MrBeast hid that you could enter for free or not..

He doctored evidence though so it is all called into question.

He doctored evidence though so it is all called into question.

It was quiet necessary I would say. Mr beast is infact not good of a person but to just dismiss and bury every deed he's done with false allegations and using deceptive means just for dog pack to get a little attention is honestly much more disgusting. Just imagine spending millions of dollar much of which helped numerous people's life, just for this dude to outright call it "fake" and the entire internet actually believing.

I do agree on some of your views, but I’m confused by your edit. What channels or videos have been uploaded within the last few hours that also go in depth about exposing dogpack? Are there any keywords you used specifically? I’m trying to search by most recently uploaded but I don’t see many videos discrediting dogpack besides a few made months ago. Thanks

@@Viewer13128 Yes! This video is for the most part great but very weird in how he just slaps MrBeast on the wrist saying "There, there. No more of that" as if he didn't do anything.

Hoodie saying that because of DogPack many people are now not going to be able to walk pisses me off. Nothing has stopped them from anonymously giving to charities without a camera. DogPack has stopped you from filming them for your profit! If there is more I'd like to hear it but I find that unlikely.

Jake Weddle in my opinion is completely innocent here. I believe he just trusted Dawson because he said everything he wanted to hear. Jake is proof himself that videos are faked, being subscribed to get in a video is practically not true (and many others came out saying they were in challenges and pretty much everyone was somehow related to someone related to MrBeast) and that the safety was terrible. Jake clearly took the war crimes bit as a joke, he was literally laughing. Soggy paints him as being dishonest when all the evidence of him being "dishonest" came from himself... which is honesty...? Jake also mentioned there was tribalism in the staff over how much of a yes man you were to Jimmy and the fact the guy Dawson tricked to get on the video says that even close friends of him have cut contact is proof of that! And we just let it slide!?

No!? I keep coming back here because the more I watch the more half baked I realise it is and that even if Dawson was going on a revenge spree half of what he claimed isn't proven wrong yet, or was actually true to a certain extent (yes, Jimmy wasn't on the raft because of the storm, but how many people believed he stayed on the raft in the storm?) and everything Jake Weddle said appears to be completely true, this video does a massive disservice to him.

(Also as a side note, c'mon. "I bought 100 boobs" is funny. That's funny! Imagine "I bought 100 balls". It sucks that Dawson went down this route. He has a fun personality and he's a great communicator and he clearly knows his stuff. If he took the revenge option of being MrBeast but with an actual personality I would have loved that, sucks he went down to the lying side)

And the whole flying to Beast HQ to interview current employees. Soo the company can open doors to a YT 'journalist', to talk about another yt 'journalist', but not actually acknowledge anything? Pretty shady, especially with beast pr in crisis mode.

Also how was the ideation team just two people in an office when we had dogpack, his coworker, and manager? like where was the ideation manager when dogpack was supposedly making his coworker uncomfortable working in an office together?

@@shaquillesommerville4060 I mean, everyone else is biased against Mr. Beast so by that logic they're not trustworthy either.

@@shaquillesommerville4060 I mean, everyone else is biased against Mr. Beast so by that logic they're not trustworthy either.

@@Skyhigh_905 Not really. It's one thing to just reporting and commenting on the allegations.

However, if you're going be the guy disproven allegations then its of your best interest to also point out what is true or get to the bottom of said proof rather than arguing "well he got fired so that's why Dogpack made allegation about an SA CEO.",  "Maybe Mr.beast was young and not sure about background check." ,maybe Jimmy made a mistake.... Stuff like that to disprove allegations are going be more criticize then allegations

i mean you kind of sound like a dogpack shill here;

the delaware nickname is embroidered onto the shirt in the original video so he clearly GOES by delaware. if he isn't actually banned from the state of delaware, which the video explains, then they arent talking about his past history. it's borderline impossible to know what mrbeast does or doesnt know so whatever on that

the sleep deprivation thing is just dumb - the channel is calling out how comparing getting 10,000 dollars a day to live in shitty conditions to rape and war crimes is insane, and not representative of the full picture.

no purchase necessary is a legal "loophole" that exists on literally every box of cereal with a giveaway and we literally get an example of someone winning something from it in the video.

in conclusion stfu

@@shaquillesommerville4060 Yeah, I think the entire situation is just stupid, though I will say I've never felt right about dogpack. He seems kind of mental but I've always felt that MrBeast had something to hide too.

@@shaquillesommerville4060 "He makes no attempt in mentioning (at least from what I heard) about Jake the Viking making the statement that Mr.beast and his mother were inform about said past and kept him around."<br>Even if I don't agree with Cereal's video he did mention this (rather snarkily) and proceeded to say how the Viking guy can't be trusted since he is a bad person and that Jimmy was a young muffin.

@@shaquillesommerville4060 "He makes no attempt in mentioning (at least from what I heard) about Jake the Viking making the statement that Mr.beast and his mother were inform about said past and kept him around."
Even if I don't agree with Cereal's video he did mention this (rather snarkily) and proceeded to say how the Viking guy can't be trusted since he is a bad person and that Jimmy was a young muffin.

@ I would rather prefer a real debunk on the claim rather than the attack someone character approach.  That’s literally the same excuse they tried for Lunchly Mold situation and look at how well that turn.

@ I would rather prefer a real debunk on the claim rather than the attack someone character approach.  That’s literally the same excuse they tried for Lunchly Mold situation and look at how well that turn.

@@Viewer13128 It also doesn't make it better that Mrbeast commented on this video.

@@Viewer13128 It also doesn't make it better that Mrbeast commented on this video.

> The whole point of the nickname was about emphasizing the fact these guys can't get basic fact checking well. The guy wasn't some predator that MrBeadt knowingly hired. He was some bestbuy employee who got the background of a criminal, that MrBeast didnt do background check on, because he was an adolesent 19 yo

> You still shouldn't joke around when making serious claims against a person, and the thing is, he can leave at any time. And he wasn't gonna leave empty handed either. He was leaving with a good sum of money collected from the time he spent, and was even offered money even after the challenge.

> In the age of gacha and lootboxes, giveaways are overall average. You can argue it's a scummy bussiness practice, which you seemed to leave out the fact Soggy pretty much said it is, but it's not "illegal lottery"

Also, calling this video a MrBeast propaganda when the dude not only have criticized MrBeast, but also suggest checking out videos that exposed his crypto scams is insane. The guy wasn't criticizing MrBeast as heavily because this was a video talking about DogPack. There's already hundreds of video covering the guy

@@Viewer13128 The whole point of the video is about Dogpack404's massive slander of mrbeast, you know well mrbeast's reputation is now ruined, not just deeply, but permanently. Everyone likes it apparently. Due to this awareness, mrbeast is now facing real allegations like crypto, and all that was really making mrbeast guilty are unexpected mistakes, how can you expect to do better than the future you doing more fairly, I can bet my money you and including others didn't know about illegal lotteries, conscience in behavior, or how fair you can make for everyone years ago. No one is perfect and any situation coincidental, including unacceptable actions is something people can't control without awareness, knowledge, or experience, until they found out but can't change the mistakes in the past. Either you have to know how to act, be responsible, and express the right way to the public, or ruin your image even further in other's judgement by your wrong acts... in this case, some influencers are unfortunately uncapable of addressing rightfully when they have immense pressure and influence from the population of their audience.

@@fonkedonke there's a video made by Stucky that goes more in depth about him, I suggest to check it out because Jake Weddle's very much not a trustworthy guy

@@fonkedonke there's a video made by Stucky that goes more in depth about him, I suggest to check it out because Jake Weddle's very much not a trustworthy guy

@@shaquillesommerville4060 the claim about jake the viking is pretty valid, but its also stilll important to note of him not being a good person and his words not being trustworthy

But the parts about the illegal lottery isn't. The issue is that you have to take into consideration about limited time offers, where a chance to offer might be closed off and you can't enter anymore. You can also just check the site itself if you need more information

Ah here we go. When the popular narrative gets disproven, the only cop out is to just call it “Mr Beast propaganda.” Just take ur L and bounce.

Ah here we go. When the popular narrative gets disproven, the only cop out is to just call it “Mr Beast propaganda.” Just take ur L and bounce.

@@shaquillesommerville4060 my reply got deleted so saying it again. While the point about Jack the Viking is valid, its also important to note he's not a reliable source, nor a good person.

However, the part about the charity ain't. For one, you need to realize its a limited time event, methods of signing up id already gone by now, and you can aldo just check the site if you wanted to. Regardless its still prove that those videos aren't illegal lotteries

@@ChaosEater39I think he deleted the YouTube comment ☠

@@ChaosEater39I think he deleted the YouTube comment ☠

@@naganut9718 I watched the video but he didn't really say much. Sorry this is long. I've gone through pretty much every point and checked out the original videos to see if they hold up:

- Saying "yea, running a marathon in 2 days is easy" is just really dismissive, especially when you need to remember that this guy has had barely any sleep.
- Making a disgusting joke about petite pregnant girls and comparing it to hiring an RSO is insane and nowhere near as close.
- I've found Jake saying he didn't do stuff FOR money, I can't find anything saying he will NEVER ACCEPT money. Jake admitted to taking the money, that was honesty. If there is an actual quote that I've just missed from Jake of him being hypocritical then sure, but so far he seems clean.
- As for wanting a raise it's also very dismissive of how little they were getting paid. He said he mentioned the writer's guild because it was the closest thing. That means that he probably only took the writer's guild into proportion of what it is at Netflix and then lowered the salary according the the difference ads make on Netflix v YouTube. I can't prove that but neither can anyone else prove the opposite. It's a claim that I'd like to see investigated.
- Comparing himself to rape victims is wrong, I'm not going to say it is good but you need to remember that this guy was angry flying off the handle for very valid reasons of people dismissing his trauma, of course he was going to say something stupid, that doesn't take away any part of his testimony. Perfect victim fallacy.
- I don't trust this Stucky guy. At one point in the video he made it out as if Jake couldn't handle doing a rubik's cube because it was pushing him extra hard. But he purposefully left out that Jake was actually referring to the marathon that he was being pushed extra hard for. He also left out the paint fumes bit and didn't mention that Jake said the pool being lukewarm was a silly complaint. They have to be intentionally manipulated.
- Still all the points I mentioned stand, videos are faked, poor pay, tribalism, people brought in normally have connections to connections, they'll do philanthropy as long as it's on camera and they couldn't turn the lights off because recording was more important than safety.
- As for milking the situation out, yea that's annoying I personally don't find him funny and that seems to be a lot of people's opinion so it's understandable why he would go that way

@fonkedonke  > He never said it was easy, he said it wasn't that hard. And while I get he barely have any sleep, I feel like he should've put that into account
> It was never comparible, as its not the whole point. The whole point is that its hypocritical to vall someone hiring creeps while you also have acted creepily of your own in the past, regardless whether or not it was a joke
> If that's the case, then he should've made himself clear about it. What he assumes the pay would be should be explained more, but he didn't. Also didn't  MrBeast already told him the price money? He failed the challenge, and he still have a good 100k, and was even given more money after the challenge
> Mental health isn't something worth noting in the case of him comparing himself to sa victims. You're making very serious allegations of someone, regardless of mental health, you should at least think twice before saying something online. If you're gonna excuse mental health, then there's gonna be a lot of innocent people got falsely accused, even if the evidence is flimsy at best because of mental health
> He didn't mention leave out the extra hard bit? He said right after the rubik's cube, not much implications he was talking about the marathon when making that statement. If that's the case, I feel like he would be saying "When I heard that, I just can't refuse to do the marathon". As for the pool bit, he immediately says "it's a silly complaint, but the water was cold and you're taking short amount of time", which I feel like is trying to not make it sound as silly, not to mention he literslly displays it right there
> Videos are faked have very flimsy evidence that was later disproven by Soggy, people brought in having connection is also flimsy as basic research shown there's multiple different people with little to no internet fame parcitipating, and having employees doesn't break the rules. Not to mention the evidence of all of them being insider are usually just anonymous dms. I feel like the filming part over safety would be fair, but they also have taken many safety percautions before. Such as the ocean challenge, adding camera trained people, covid test, etc. He also wasn't underpaid. Getting like 10k a day from a challenge is still a good deal, and at the end of the day he earned a 150k, which is a lot more money that people wishes they have
> About the whole "he never said he didn't wanted money". He later on said he didn't accept the money so he won't be bought by MrBeast, but him than accepting 50k pretty much makes him a hypocrite

I'm gonna look into the fumes bit later on. And while I do understand if you think Stucky downplays his trauma, everyone's reaction and struggles are different, the issue is his reaction to it as a whole shows immaturity

Also, milking situation isn't good for him. You're taking down your credibility as a person because what they gonna see is a manchild milking as much cash as they can

@@naganut9718 - I think "not that hard" and "easy" are pretty much synonymous in this case coming from him. If he can't walk for days afterwards then you can't take that away from him. It wasn't "not that hard", it was in fact very hard,. He touched on something tedious in order to nullify the effect as "not that hard"
- I do not think it is hypocritical at all and again it falls for the perfect victim fallacy and it still doesn't take away anything he said. At the same time, you need to remember that "petite teen" normally refers to 18 and 19 year olds and from what I can tell with my research the tweet was made in 2020. From what I can find he is probably 24 now, which means Jake made that tweet when he was 21! So no, Jake made a bad joke that makes me feel weird because personally I find teen porn fetishes to be disgusting even if it is legal. But he never acted creepy in the way of being into kids (edit: or joking he was).
- He was making himself clear, he said he took money from MrBeast and gave reasons why, you can't be much clearer than that. He didn't know that he was going to get money previously which is why he didn't say it, he never expected it.
- I agree. I do not think he should have posted it and do not agree with him but what I'm saying is that this doesn't make anything he said untrustworthy, it makes him a guy who fell off the handle for understandable reasons to make seriously harmful comparisons

@@fonkedonke > For the average person, this isn't a hard task. Sure, Jake Weddle have circumstances, but if that's the case I feel he should've explained his issues rather than just doing it unwillingly, there's also no penalty if he failed the task outside of losing the extra cash
> Its still hypocritical no matteer what you think. The guy is calling other people creepy while he himself made inappropriate and creepy jokes before. And it being a joke is a poor excude because that was the same excuse Kris pulled
> His reasoning fucking sucked. Just because he explained as to why he isn't a hypocrite in his mind doesn't mean he isn't a hypocrite. If I called out someone for stealing money, than later do it myself, but in my head "well I have to pay my medical bills", it's still hypocritical. He himself said he won't accept the money MrBeast offers so he won't be bought by them, but then immediately accept the 50k.
> If that's your stance fine, but its also understandable there are other people who are fishy of what he's saying when he shown to act like a deranged bratty person

@@naganut9718 I don't have much more to say and can't be bothered with going deeper (I really don't know why I'm here at all hahahah, I normally stumble upon MrBeast stuff and really don't care all that much, which yea, is weird after the amount I've said, trust me this is procrastination and losing track of time to things I think would just take 5 mins rather than caring) so I'll just leave with this, glad to talk to someone that isn't just condescending and actually interacts with the argument:
- It is true Stucky mentioned he was pressured into running the marathon but when Jake was explaining being pushed into it Stucky says "a rubix cube is not the olympics". Jake probably wouldn't have cared about a rubix cube, when he was talking about pressure he was leading up to talking about the marathon and used the rubix cube as a very quick example. By making someone seem petty for not wanting to do a rubix cube you make it easier to dismiss a marathon as "not that hard".
- I've watched a podcast with that "chronically online girl explains" girl saying she was on a challenge and when she spoke to everyone there they all seemed to have connections to connections. I also find it very coincidental that many of the people involved in different videos are part of the industry. No, this does not necessarily mean the video are completely fake no do they have to be random. But promising the idea of "random" subscribers seems to be pretty flimsy as well. Maybe there are random subscribers but very very very rarely. I don't think it is wrong for employees to take part but I think that if it is true that most people are not "random" subscribers then you should be more open that these people are friends of friends of friends rather than random people. Jake also mentioned how he had to act in some videos and pretend the things that happened were real. The whole "real" thing doesn't really interest me tho, I'd agree with Soggy that a behind the scenes channel may help, who cares if a pit isn't as deep as it seems.
- Anonymous messages are just as suspect as interviewing people who are managers at the company where one of the allegations is tribalism of yes men. Unfortunately, this ends up as a he said, she said situation. But if Locoya Hill rumours are true then everything in the interviews will be immediately dismissed as bias just as much as Dawson was biased. I'm using Locoya hill as an example because Soggy did a pretty bad job of defending that, most of the video I think is great though.
- I think we may have confused the prize money bit to asking for a raise bit, that's the part that I'm saying he was underpaid.
- I can't find him claiming that he won't be bought by MrBeast. If that's true then sure he's a hypocrite, I'll agree. But I'd also point out being bought out is to retract your statement through bribes, not take no money at all through donations. But sure, if he said he will never take any money under any circumstances then sure, that's hypocrisy
- Jake said he was pressured into doing the marathon, he wouldn't have needed to explain his issues of sleep deprivation because they were already obvious and the thing is he did explain his issues, he said he's had absolutely no training and again, he is absolutely drained.
- I don't think that making jokes excuses things when it is illegal and morally wrong. Being into 19 year olds when you're 21 is not illegal nor is a 2 year age gap predatory, nor are jokes that are sexual in nature inherently creepy. I find teen stuff weird but if I had a 21 year old friend date a pregnant 19 year old I wouldn't think much of it other than "that's weirdly specific". That's like if I joke that I borrowed money from you and you call me a hypocrite for saying I don't like robbers. This whole joke thing is so ad hominem. Nowhere in the joke were there sa connotations, nowhere in the joke was it presumed they were underage, nothing in the joke was creepy. Crude yes, creepy no. He also had 6 likes, he was saying this to friends where it isn't weird to say what type of people you are into, especially if you are joking! Literally nothing has happened in that tweet. If you have to dig that hard in order to have reasons to dislike someone then lie saying that it's actually predatory, then I'm not gonna trust them, especially when the rest of the video is pretty much dismissing his trauma. Ava's situation is completely different, because when it came to Ava they were actual morally wrong and illegal underage jokes told to people who are underage, I think the jokes were inappropriate, not grooming (people need to stop watering down that term) but definitely wrong to talk to underage people like that.

@fonkedonke  > It isn't really easier to dismiss a marathon, like at all. If I say "he doesn't wanna do basic math quizzes, him not wanting to solve complex algebra seems not hard" it won't invalidate the point. The whole point, what MrBeast requested for him, isn't demanding for any average person. He was also was only "pressured" and not really forced into it. And also, you don't have to do the whole marathon. You can just attempt it for a bit, and if you can't, just simply give up. Again, it wouldn't disqualified him, he would only just lose the extra price money

> They literally show multiple contestants from the database that these people aren't from North Carolina. They used multiple different examples of people actually having small following, and even doing basic google search. Stop saying "it's a flimsy argument" when your argument is a random podcast. Also, anonymous dms are even less reliable than actuan interviews. It's a lot easier to make up fake communications between people that never consent to them compared to interviews

> What raise bit are you talking about then? The guy was paid for the challenge he does, failed, and expected more money than he should've expected. And MrBeast even apologize and even given him the rest of the money not expecting anything in return

> He literally said that he won't accept any more money from his because he won't be bought. He only accepted 50k because of his logic "if I don't accept the full pay, I'm not bought by him". What this does is just tanking your credibility while you take almost a quarter of the money you could've gotten

> Again, the issue isn't him making some tweet. The issue is that its makes him a hypocrite. He came out calling out Kris Tyson for saying weird shit before, while he have done the same thing. Making creepy "jokes" with heavy implication of it being a minor is still gross.


At this point the slop is too much for me to handle....

Mr beast is a scumbag still tho... Because he needs to give a proper reply to all the allegations...

@Lunkie  meh it's just people pointing fingers at each other so it seems like slop to me...


Dog pack just look like a crocked person


Sry man, this just seems too one-sided to believe this video was made with zero prompting. And the intervirws are done with ppl that have too much to lose. Maybe u could team up with Coffeezilla to give the videos more credit


Feast, brothers! These are the finest, the sloppiest oats a piggy can dine on! Feast!


I think it would be best to just not waste our time into online dramas and controversies. At this point We viewers are just  being treated like ping pong balls, being tossed around from one side to the other lol. Can't believe any side tbh. I believe Jimmy was overrated, not a good guy and honestly it is good that at least his indecency is being exposed. Neither dog pack was a good fellow, had his own motives and agendas. But now the truth is being shown to the viewers, so it's good I guess. Just my opinion tho.


I just watch for the content cop reenactment.. can any one else spoil it for me


This whole thing is the dumbest video I’ve watched. You can go by point by point and disprove half of it without evidence just logic.

@@hydro1389literally the first point the only thing he added was 1. He is allowed in Delaware which we knew bc of what Viking said 2. Jimmy didn’t know he was a so when he got hired which is undoubtedly his fault and Delaware stayed on the team even after he knew at least as soon as he found out he should’ve gotten fired

@@hydro1389this is a terrible attempt to get fame and money and has more holes than a sponge


Ok bro we get it stop changing the thumbnail


honestly i fell for his bs and now i cant stop feeling horrible once i found out.


Alternate Title: Mr.Beasts Career is saved


Dockpack got fired by Beast, gone meltdown, and tried shitting him, everyone believed him..

Correction: dogpack worked at mrbeast, chris Tyson news went mainstream, dogpack blew the whistle on other things going on at the company with evidence, now soggy and other commentary channels are on jimmy payroll using ad hominem attacks to make dogpack lose credibility

@@sxmbxdydogpack glazer spotted 🗣🗣

Jokes aside, both dogpack and mrbeast deserve criticism


SKIBIDITOILET I MAKE BETTER CONTENT😂 😂😂 SKIBIDI TOILET SIGMA OHIO RIZZ KAI CENAT KSI NEW SONG I LIKE MY CH

@pepajust4099  Zkidibi Toyaletzz 😎 a new cool sigma way to speell skijidi toilet


disstrack on dogpack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMM1Y76yzfk


More Pegasus after this: He's saved, The truth, More Truth, Its finally done, Truly done, Actually over...


@@cats9994he weirdly tries to exonerate mrbeast on the illegal lotteries and war crime doe

@@sxmbxdy uh yeah bc the war crime point is shit, there's genuine stuff to go at Jimmy for. also where did he try to exonerate about the illegal lotteries


Everyone comment so this video gets spread around more.


Who would have guessed. So many gullible chronically online people jumped on Mr. Beast after that provocateur's, DogPack 404's, videos. I always maintain how dangerous it is to treat mere allegations as facts. If you think your reasoning is strong enough then go prove it in the court instead of passing blame: likely the court system is friendly to the plaintiff.


i can feel mfs like MorePegasus bout to switch from milking mr beast to milking dogpack


Only real ones know he already talked about this in a deleted video


now, I know this is kind of small. but the faking of videos(and charity in particular) is something I want to be addressed in more perspectives


The point about slavery is pretty dumb because Tony's Chocolonely Works with Barry Callebaut who does Work with child labor and modern slavery So MrBeast working with them means nothing

Glad someone else mentioned thos because Tony's was dropped from the slavery-free list.


“hawk 1: boo!”
“hawk 2: ahh!”
ahh comment


the slop is so thick i cannot move or see anything


“I asked mr beasts pr guy if he was a bad guy, he said no. Case closed!”


One more cow to milk before the year ends everybody! Send this immediately to morepegasus!


dogpack managed to make people see that beast is not above criticism and neither is he the perfect good boy people preached him to be, and im glad he did it. that being said im also glad now people started to actually analyze what he's saying; it always seemed pretty suspicious to me at how much he defends behind "NDA", as if an NDA would be enforcable when literal crimes are commited as they "allegedly" are.

i just hope that after this is over beast will learn from his mistakes and become less negligent, and dogpack falls into obscurity unable to ride the clout he generated from this.


Classic villain arc. Obsession -> Rejection -> Retribution


@@cats9994 Dog pack fans can only say "You're controlled opposition", "how much did Mr. Beast pay you to make this", and "Stop meatriding Mr. Beast".


I dunno man maybe "I asked the team who are under fire if any of the stuff happened and they said no" is maybe not the best way to go about it<br>I'm just saying I won't be surprised if you buy a Lamborghini in the next few weeks with money you can't disclose the source of

I dunno man maybe "I asked the team who are under fire if any of the stuff happened and they said no" is maybe not the best way to go about it
I'm just saying I won't be surprised if you buy a Lamborghini in the next few weeks with money you can't disclose the source of


dogpack was a bit believable at first but then there was WAY too many allegations to be believable, jimmy isnt an angel nor a demon


dogpack was a bit believable at first but then there was WAY too many allegations to be believable


I’m sure dog pack will make a response video debunking all of soggy cereal’s claims


Mr beast is not out of the mud yet but will we see redemption


i was arrogant enough to just go off was dopack404 said and assume everything he said was thoroughly researched and true, sure, you exposed this guy, but whats stopping you from being wrong like dogpack? unless multiple other people can back up what you said during this video, im not even gonna bother with this drama no more

Stop wanting to be spoonfed and do ur own research


This is giving arcane universe, everyone has done good and bad things

Going back to Weddle, though, I think the Delaware nickname was what he assumed because he didn’t know the context. Weddle is obviously mentally ill because of trauma he’s experienced throughout his life. I didn’t take that at face value, as I knew that was probably his assumption, so I didn’t believe the Delaware nickname was for that reason. About his friend joking, I believe he knew that it was a joke and was trying to cope with his experiences. This video, like dog packs video, implies that Weddle knew about it and like conspired with him on the interview. I don’t believe he did, I think his memory was just clouded with confirmation bias and an assumption about why he was called Delaware, and with the war joke he clearly took as a joke to cope. I knew it was a joke because war crimes would be ridiculous but I could tell he mentioned it to cope with his experiences. The rest of the accusations against him in the video are to be taken with the knowledge that any could be true or false, I know nothing of those. But it is unfair to state that Weddle maliciously intent to depict his friend as seriously saying that his experiences were comparable to war crimes, as Weddle literally states: “my friend jokingly said”…


"Asking North Koreans what they think of their leader" aaahh type video 🗣🗣

Let's see if this comment gets intentionally hidden, that's all the proofs I need

"aaaaah type video 🗣🗣" tf does that even mean

mate wtf is this proving? It didnt get deleted because he does not support mrbeast or dogpack, and he for sure as hell does not censor people because he likes seeing braindead people try and make stupid comments to ride dogpack's meat.


HAHAHAHHA BRO I WANT MRBEAST TO SUE LITERALLY EVERYONE IT WOULD BE SO SO FUNNY XD AHAHAHAHAHA


you're giving people a voice between the cries of the crowd, good job 👍


This whole situation is truly a roller coaster of emotions


I don't even know what to believe anymore. Youtubers space is pretty much like your average high school with all the plot twists drama lately

The solution is to just not care. Supporting either side wouldn't give you any benefits. Try to find other things better to do.

And that's exactly NOT what I'm doing right now.

just watch and try to come to your own conclusion.

@@elithzymending ngeroast dogpack sama mrbeast aja 😂

@@kategf1999 Gak guna mas. Mending belajar alasan kenapa rumus GLBB itu s = (v_0)t + 1/2(at²)

@@crosheljarron9982 nah i agree with the first dude. It's genuinely better not to care


1.yeah he did it for views.
2.yes he manipulate a lot in video.
3.but starting from his video, people stop believe mrbeast is that good guy, and find real things he has done.
4.without his videos, mrbeast wont be accountable for anything for years.
5.his videos make good movement even and he just use all bad information people talk in years, but no one want check what is true or what is lie


the algo showed me a video citing your video before showing me yours so i left his and channel came to yours... youtube is dumb. good work soggy.


I never watched any of the dogpack videos mrbeast because i did think most of it was fake


SOAP TRUSTED YOU DOGPACK. AND I DID TOO.


"jarvis, play "The Dogpack404 situation is insane" videos."

"there is too many."


So if Jimmy’s shitty company doesn’t have perfect victims then it’s fine, okay sure


Crazy how a vid can have millions of views and i still never heard of it. Youtube is crazy.


When will "Soggy Cereal situation is insane" come out where this video will be discreted, making dog pack look good and mrbeast look bad


Thanks for this video.  Jimmy is a good person.  Good will prevail over evil.


guys i havent watched it yet dont spoil it


This feels like a bad sitcom at this point 😅😂


called it bloody called it i knew this guy would just be some attention seeking guy looking to take advantage after chris got exposed and because of that it was the perfect opportunity for people to start these rumours and turns out i’m right well there’s still the lawsuit and i guess maybe i might of been wrong on jake waddle because that was half and half but oh how good it feels to be right


suprised people didn't realize dogpack was bad. i did by JUST THE 1ST VIDEO HE MADE. ok it was like 4 days after it was made i became insanely suspicious, but this took too long


Fraudpack glazers might have to be one of the most braindead npcs I’ve ever seen.  They keep repeating the same old bs every single time if a person is exposed Fraudpack ( I know most fans do this but these glazers crank this to freaking 11.) Like PLEASE do some research before following someone..

Last year if you criticize Mr beast you would be criticized but just a couple months ago if you criticized dog pack you’d be called a ‘Mr beast glazer’


Honestly im not backing down, this video is really flexing words to defend mrbeast "allegally" (cause he doesn't want to sound that he is suporting mrbeast but he is) like the sleep deprivation thing, just because some people are dying on a war that doesn't make the problem less, and also just because he is not being detained, doesn't change the fact that mrbeast is still using humillation and borderline torture as enterteinment

Totally agree, it's a shame comments like yours gets shadow🍌ned. This just proves our point tho

I don’t think this guy understands the toxic work culture at mrbeast HEAVILY discouraged Jake from quitting the challenge

So what do you think of mamamax bs then?

@@sxmbxdyoh no poor Jake weddle didn’t get enough sleep so sad

@@dubbyplays It never got shadowed, hes not hiding these comments, stop trying to make it seem like hes mrbeast who just censors everyone so his audience does not find it. Like bro you guys are overreacting so godamn much

Can’t take this comment serious, Ryan gosling as profile pic and name, defending pussboi weddle lmao go to your room junior

@@noahniskala I did not say "his comment" is, I said comments "like his" gets. And not just by creators but YT itself many times.

A comment that appears only in "Latest" tab but not the "Most relevant" tab, is shadow 🍌. Even talking about this topic often gets your comment hidden. I don't even know if this same comment will appear

@@noahniskala I did not say "his comment" is, I said comments *"like his"* gets. And not just by creators but YT itself many times.

A comment that appears only in "Latest" tab but not the "Most relevant" tab, is shadow 🍌. Even talking about this topic often gets your comment hidden. I don't even know if this same comment will appear

@@leviticusprime4904 And here it goes another toxic Beast glazer

oh my gosh the world is not black and white, he did criticize MrBeast with PROOFS

It's curious that a seemingly unconnected content creator takes his time to fly overseas and conveniently has access to several employees, and asks specific damage-control related questions.

@@droketheroper Bro is discovering journalism for the first time.


dude. are you really commenting this on a serious video??? you are a disgusting human being.

@somebody68434  WOMP WOMP CRY HARDER LIL BRO

@@kategf1999 you sound like you are 3 years old

@@somebody68434 skibidi toilet

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIBBBBBBBBBBBBBBIIIIIIIIIIIIIDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIII TOOOILEEERTTTT 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😅😆🤣😂😆😁😄😅😍😏🤤😋😅😙😊😅


I think rosanna pansino is an equally big clown. its so obvious the way shes milking the whole scenario. she needs to be held accountable


Soggy Cereal, thank you for making this and shedding light on the misinformation spread about MrBeast.

Just as I predicted, both sides were scumbags.

Although I still disagree wih the chocolate one, the real problem was that MrBeast still advertised his chocolate brand as healthy even though its only slightly unhealthier than Hersheys.


Dude, he made one video. He ain’t Shitpegasus.


This Dogpack situation is insane, he is finished, it's over, over like my recommendations page for the next 5 days after watching this


I dont got any media literacy. I blindly believed dogpack, and now im gonna blindly believe you because its easiest on my mental bandwidth. The world is too crazy for me to keep up with, so if you get disproven on your claims, I'll blindly believe the person who debunks you. As the cycle goes to make sure I'm not swallowed whole by the court of public opinion


How much did MrBeast pay you to make this video? Also, you can’t just say everything wasn’t true just because there’s some spite doesn’t mean the stuff he has dug up isn’t true. He was the only one brave enough to speak up against your shitty company.

If a Dogpack fan says you got paid by Mrbeast you're winning the argument


Man actually got Mr.Breast to address the allegations, so good that he can get all my fibers and nutrients


Most of the things dawson said were correct except for maybe some things in his third video, and Mr beast did this to himself - Streisand effect. He thought it would fade away and he wont have to address them.


bro what the fuck is going on?? who am I supposed to trust man?????

@@ISHAANP-eq5ddHe mentioned that at the end.


MrBeast's channel clearly suffered from this situation so why did he not make a response? like he is literally mr beast so he doesn't have to investigate the situation or anything since he is the situation<br>so why did he not make a response like this video?

MrBeast's channel clearly suffered from this situation so why did he not make a response? like he is literally mr beast so he doesn't have to investigate the situation or anything since he is the situation
so why did he not make a response like this video?

Responding to the video would only escalate the situation and draw more attention to the drama. The best approach to handle such drama, especially at his level, is to remain silent. Take, for example, what happened with Dream: when he addressed the allegations, it just brought more people into the drama and caused many people to draw the conclusion that dream was in the wrong without watching the video even though he wasn't. This ultimately harmed his channel.

@@lilin1242why did he respond to this video

@@NearlyAsleeppeople watching this video already know about the drama


Cant wait for a third unknown party to say actually this guy is lying


I had the "attention whore" feeling about that dogpack dude right away. those "accusations" where never serious. ad a bit of manipulation and drama is ready. he needs to go


Mr cereal what about the hospital cgi and the philantropy vids would love a follow up.


I have a question about the Delaware Person: Do we have proof that he is actually fired?


this is don flamenco dodging and countering your punch and you dodging and countering his dodge and counter punch


I don’t even know who to trust at this point to be honest.

Crazy right? In the end both were accountable for their actions

watch the video.<br>As far as I'm seeing, Soggy is right here.

watch the video.
As far as I'm seeing, Soggy is right here.


He still isn’t much of a good person. He just isn’t as bad as people thought

Bro ur like 12 years old, this is big kid stuff u need to stay out of

MrBeast had the biggest downfall and comeback in the same year

No, MrBeast is not innocent.  Soggy only debunked some of the trivial things. The actual serious allegations were brushed under the rug or are misunderstanding the real issue.


Conclusion: mrbeast, dog pack and soggy cereal all cannot be trusted

@@Skibidi_Sigma_Edits alright sure. i trust the guy named "skibidi_sigma_edits"


How does it get to some other Youtuber having to interview some workers at their company? This is a weak view on Mr Beast in my view.

Mr Beast has not replied to any of the accusations. That shows how unwilling they are to really protect their image or that they hide something


Man... I don't know who to trust anymore

Maybe i shouldn't trust everyone on the internet


MrBeast might have the greatest downfall and comeback in the same year


Next THIS guy is getting exposed for something surrounding kids. Drama will never run out of fuel with this stuff.


the funniest sh in the entire video is 0:40, like so much money and yall come up with the crap that every scammer says