People are saying Mr Beast is asking creators to cover this, which reeks to me of PR. Dogpack404 being a shady person does not invalidate valid points he has made by default. You present this like Mr Beast is an underdog who needs defending, when he is still thriving off kids. Maybe focus on the bigger problem first.

That’s why I think he should make a second video that focuses on the VALID criticism of MrBeast so people don’t take this as a “MrBeast is innocent, I guess we were right the whole time”

That's because this is PR. He straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

So if not PR what do you want supposed Mr Beast do then? What exactly do people want , I’m confused

@@ltreylukwesa A true, genuine response. He can't and won't do that though, because he's guilty of too many terrible things at this point to actually save his reputation.

@@shadowed69the fact you even had to reply to tell them this lmao.

@@shadowed69 well he doesn’t have to respond to anyone apart from the people that are actually directly involved and genuinely need their issues sorted, so it doesn’t matter what you want unfortunately for you and I , we are just randos on the internet


And people said I was a glazer on your video because I pointed out facts...

Lmao, you are one of beasts worst haters, lmao,  jew

Its great to see you watching it as well

bruh, don't be that hypocrite, you made a 1st video disclaiming dogpack, then you made another slandering mrBeast and apolgizing him, and now again on the other side??? please make a video with more investigation dude, your last one felt kinda biased against jimmy, though he needs to address some stuff tbh. just make and objective video

Buddy U made apology video for not doing enough research and still didn't do enough research bruh. Make a part three


Can I be honest?  None of these people should be deemed as "heroes"
Just becuase this person exposed this person, or that person got exposed for this.
It doesn't mean anything imo...  ???

I rather just be neutral on everything until mrbeast himself says something
but other than that,  I equally dislike everybody until then


Okay but the thing is not the story behind Delaware  that was a scandal but the fact that he IS a RSO and that he WAS hired. The story behind it could have been a he said she said thing, who cares if the story is true or not? The fact that he is a RSO is the problem!

Garrett was frantic for a month and lost someone he was close to and took a huge financial hit because a recording of him was leaked? I mean I am totally with you that recording this unconsencually and then releasing it (voicechanger or not) is a wrong and fucked up thing to do, but this just seems like it was played up to debunk what he said.

'It wasn't a warcrime because Weddle wasn't a detainee'' But he was being held there against his will. It is at least deprivation of liberty and that is not okay. What kind of point are you trying to make? It''s okay to lock people up in a room that they don't want to be in and torture them mentally if you pay them afterwards?

''He took 50k of this 190k offer of goodwill from Jimmy feeling bad for Weddle even though Weddle slandered him'' Excuse me? He was the one that locked him up. If anything he was afraid that Weddle would sue. ''Goodwill''?! Jimmy even says in the message you show that the challenge clearly had an effect on him

The Illegal Lottery #3 Allegation I don't know. He could have a custom UI for all I know, the screens that you show could also be faked. I don't even know if the Way Back Machine is credible to use for debunking such claims. But they could also be true and it could be tailored. Why even go trough the process of making a fake UI when you could just screenshot a video and play the Lottery video over the original video you screenshotted, makes no sense to me. I for one will not think it is false or true unless I see more evidence on this.

Also the fact that Jimmy said this in a stream that was god knows how many hours long once and you bashed Weddle for saying a clip was AI directly after showing that clip because people will click off.

About the dog food for life thing: So AFTER the video got out and AFTER the allegations were made whre the user Sea-Special-4546 has confirmed they didn't get anything they are suddenly like ''Oh yeah it was my fault I missed it, it's all good now'' And you are not suspicious of that? They most likely got a lot of money for damage controll to further debunk Dogpacks claims.

He is deceiving with the Chocolate: Do you not see the 43g and the 60g next to the bars? Also the fact that Jimmy starts speaking about how he wants to make healthier food for America and only does business in Chocolate and fast food should say alot. Also ''Lunchly'' the mold aside those are not healthy meals. Yes Dogpack twists the numbers here and that is wrong but you have the information needed to form your own opinion here.

The car was digitaly lifted: So you agree that the footage has been tempered with and show a noticable example. Who is to say that the footage hasn't been tempered with further that is not noticable? Yes Dogpack should put more weight to his claims but they are tempering with footage wich you also just proved.

Then reverse image search of cp is just bad. I have nothing more to say about that and I will not try to justify it.

The ''Company Chat'': Yes it has been said before that this chat started as an NSFW Chat. So how the F does a NSFW Chat have trusted Talks about company stuff in it? Why is/was it used for company related stuff?  Also the Whatsapp chat you show is literally titled ''Mr Beast Main''. Huh?

''He pushed his own agenda and framing mr beast: My dude. This is happening in a work related chat. Doesn't matter if it is marked that way, people of the company are in it and also talk about work related stuff, it even has the company brand name in  the group name. By default the Boss of the company has to put a stop to this! How can you defend this? All participants of the chat at the time thought it was CP. Why did noone do anything against that?

Oh yes the posting of what one thought to be CP was ''just a joke''. So it's okay then?!

The FBI Tweet: Now you are just taking the piss. It is not about the tweet but the multiple videos they have made about the topic so far.

About the anime: I won't watch it but the anime is listed as a romantic comedy and if you read the plot synopsis of it, it talks alot about them expressing their feelings to each other. So make of that what you will. But showing one dude going ''aCtuALly ThATs noT whAt it'S aBouT'' won't prove or disprove anything.

The Thumbnails: Saying they are pedophiles by their own logic is also absoluetly stupid. The picture was blurred to being completely unrecongnisable (if still really tasteless and shouldnt have been done) but they were firstly, not shared in their uncensored form with collaegues, and secondly not being destributed like like ''Hey look at this cp, isn't she hot'' (I am paraphrasing here but you get the idea)

As many people here have stated before: Dogpack may not be a good guy. But a lot of the things he says should be considered. You are also debunking alot of the wrong points here as I have stated in this comment. Saying he has done some stupid video titles and thumbnails before doesn't debunk the things he said.

Also ''this is the opposite of intentionally making content for children'' Are you really trying to make the point that mr beast DOESN'T gear his content towards children? Really?

'Omg look at this old sweet guy, I got so upset'' Look. It is a wink. I don't know if I winked at that specific moment last year. I doubt he was approached by Mr Beast to say this but what you are doing here pisses me off even more. Why do you have to drive it up so much? You are doing the exact same thing here that you just critizied Dogpack for.

''He helped me financially'' Yeah with the price money. They didn't help him invest which was the claim made. Showing a text chat from someone (as you said yourself) doesn't prove or disprove anything. This whole video is just a he said she said situation. You come out here puffing your chest out but you said next to nothing of substance.

''Trust me bro I saw the property listing'' Sure you did buddy.

Also the big claim Dogpack made was that Mr Beast acted like Mack was ''just some guy'' and not an employee. You convenently glossed over that to talk about his living situation.

Manipulative editing with pediepie: It was completely in context. The Pewds clip was about a giveaway where ''all you have to do is subscribe'' which is literally what is said right afterwards. It fits the context. I don't see this clip and go ''OMG Pewds hates Mr Beast''

This is gold: Again accusing weddle to say it was AI AFTER playing the clip like the first 30 secons into the video. But NOW! 43 minutes into the video you say ,,oh guys i dunno mr beast might actually be not so great'' priceless

''It took one google search to not falsly accuse someone of child slavery'' NO! Just because you explained why they took down the banner or what group they joined it doesn't disprove the possibility of them still doing such acts. I have no idea if they did an I will not go say that they did but saying ''But they are part of this movement'' doesn't mean shit.

A guy that is about to get fired from a job asks/pleads about wanting to stay in said job? The very job that affords him his livelyhood? THE SCANDAL!

Also it's amazing how you have so many neat recordings of every conversation he had with people involved in his firing

I agree that Dogpack probaly earned ALOT of money trough his videos, but the videos themself are not monetized. His subscribers are worthless if he doesn't make monetized work on his channel. One could also spin the collabs with bigger creators to say that he did it to reach more people with ''THE TRUTH'' Which I think is bullshit. Of course he saw an opportunity to earn from this. But I think earning money from making content is not wrong, spinning it to seem beneveolent is.

''Have you thought about the second launch'' Yeah but that is not what it was about was it. It was about the first launch. The second launch could be working completely different, at a different time etc. The claim made was about the first launch. The second launch in the document shown also doesn't state in the slightest that the second rocket is in association with Mr Beast.

Also also: The rocket crashed did it not? His point stands. The video was that of a rocket exploding. Was there footage of the mr beast rocket exploding? I don't care if A porsche or a lada crashes. The contents got destroyed and people didn't get what they paid for.

Thesy filled in for people who were sick. Can also easily be a lie. One of the employees did a lot of ''Damage control'' on Twitter when the first video was released and alot of it was bullshit. Also they should have said that some contestants are filling in. They were at least being manipulative by saying it's subscribers only.

Again it is completely plausible that the filling in for sick people statement is true and I will not further try to make this point valid unless Dogpack brings forth more evidence.

The valve turning situation: ''They did it for safety'' yes but the valves were faked, as Dogpack stated with the turning of the valves even when they should be completely turned since the water drained, the contestant still was able to keep turning. Again, they were being manipulative.

The raft: Again, maniupulation, they said they were there the whole time. They weren't. Why not add a short clip like ''Unfortunatly we had to leave the raft for an hour since there was a lightning storm''. They cut also seems alot longer than an hour. The video of the Barge also doesn't show any sort of storm or the Contestants being on this boat. It could just be a video of a production boat. Also we only see the top. There could very well be comfortable sleeping areas below deck and the contestants could have very well used said beds.

The 100 Day in confinement challange: Yes it is okay that they are not strangers, it is however wrong that they make it SEEM like they are Strangers. Again, manipulation

The People in the Circle video: Why didn't Mr Beast make an announcement that the video was cancled? In fact where is ANY response to the whole allegation on Mr beasts side? ( I retract this but will leave it in since I just saw the Twitter post you included in this video)

''He broke his NDA'' hurdur he is not trustworthy. You say to a statement where he even said ''Allledgedly they had people remote controlling the valves. Which if you think about it, of course they did. The evidence to it is for one in the video itself and as you said yourself neccesary for saftey reasons.

The signature: Call him stupid all you want but if I pay for a t-shirt signed by my favourite youtuber I would also like to have it signed by said youtuber and not one of his employeed. Imagine you have a signed Football from Tom Brady but now you find out it was signed by Mike the Janitor (Tom Brady said it's okay). I think this will devalue the Product a lot.

The Lottery: Is again being manipulativ. Putting it in the description you actually have to open and read is one thing. Saying ''Buy a shirt if you want x reward'' is another. It is also again something you have thrown shade at Weddle/Dogpack in this video before

''No doesn't mean no is taken out of context'' I'm sorry but how out of touch do you have to be to not see the problrm with putting that sentence in an official job education document for the company

So the censored person in the interview actually confirmes that the whole was faked to some degree, which again proves the point made by dogpack and further underlines the fact that Mr Beast is manipulating his footage

The Eye surgery claim: Okay so do you think that the company that made the claim that they didn't pay for it didn't try to contact Mr. Beast? Doesn't it seem odd that they only make the missing payment after someone made a controversial video about it, that gathered alot of attention to the topic? It does to me.

''We want to make the videos to appeal to an older audience'' yet they sell only chocolate and lunch packs, they use clickbaity titles and thumbnails, they lie about the conent of their videos (for example the ''abandoned'' city). ''We have to make the videos so a literal 1 year old can understand them'' So they DO cater their videos to children.

I am glad that you chose to report about the Lottery 1. It would have been an easy thing for you to not include it. Aswell as with the Coffeezilla Video, as it turns out, it was with the Brand name but not with Jimmy himself. One can believe that or not but it seems like Jimmy either has no clue what happens in his company or he does and he uses it for his benefit

I feel like there were alot of things that you were overly dramatic on and alot of stuff just seems like you pulled it out of your ass. Again Dogpack may not be a goodhearted individual but he said alot of things that stil hold up in my opinion.

thank god someone else sees through the completely un-nuanced bs

my guy, you just jumped through soo many hoops to try and rationalize dogpacks videos its crazy. Take some time, go for a walk and think it through xd. If the only way to defend someone is to argue semantics and deflect.

the funniest thing was about the fing cars: the ONLY thing they changed is a colour, there are legit videos of the jump uploaded to the fing yt channel of a guy who SPECIALIZES IN THAT and who designed and produced it for mr beast.

Oh and btw, if I understand the weddle situation its not that they paid him 50k out of 190k, they paid him 10k for every day he stayed there + after he started complaining they gave him an ADDITIONAL 50k. They did not lock him up against his will HE COULD HAVE LEFT AT ANY POINT of the video, that is by definition no tholding someone against his will.

And I will maybe touch on the point of unreleased/staged videos (circle and 24ppl for 1m dollars), when a production is big some stuff will obviously get canceled (why would he inform people about a video he is no longer releasing). As per the statements made by participants they got paid (in case of the 24ppl challange they even got double paid) so there is no one who was hurt. We also have context as to why the production was stopped: covid, which is a very valid reason imo.

@@muxie4877 Alot of it is either out of context, suspicion without proof or entirely contradictable inside the video itself lmao. Not in hell though am I trying to respond to that dump and getting a 3 page response in a youtube comment section.


This video was so well put together. Long time viewer, massive respect, curious to see what happens next


Imagine someone like Pegasus who can make a half an hour rant over an empty stomach with no new content whatsoever. He will milk Soggy for two years.

I won't be surprised if he makes a 180 just like when the dogpack video first dropped

Let's be real, no matter who is right between Mrbeast or Dogpack—Pegasus is the real winner 💀

@@AmirHassan-nw2hkit's over, it's finally done, the end, he's finished, it got worse, he's done, exposed,  he's over

@@___-000 He’s over, it’s over, finally over, he’s done, he is done, it’s done, finally done, he’s finished,  it’s finished, the finale, and finally finished haha 😂🙄

@@rob-pi7ge it just got worse, it's not over, the finale, the allegations are insane, New news just dropped


Number 1 DogPack404 hater (I dont support either sides until more evidence is out)


i cant believe mr beast would just sit silent while dogpack ran rampant with defamation, either he was cooking up the best debunking video yet or he just truly didnt gaf

It's cuz the company he hired to investigate the company asked him to refrain from making public statements till the investigation was over

@@leontriestoart And he decides to just post the statement and not really say much himself after and we got a lot more evidence and explanation from what would be considered a small youtuber today.  Good that Dogpack was exposed since he lied about what he presented, but there's still something fishy going on with Mr.Beast and he needs to clear it up.

Most of his audience is just kids so the videos didn't really affect him but it made more sense to just stay quiet and pump out videos and products.

Some people think he's probably going to sue Dogpack but its more likely he just moves on since he will be 'mostly vindicated' in the eyes of big YT creators and regular people.

well to be fair, dogpack forcing soggy to make a video is probably what lead to him getting cooked like this

Sometimes, silence is the best answer.

He's not a saint, and he made some bad decisions, but not responding to Dogpack wasn't one of them

He won't put it on his main champion because most of his subscribers are kids so yeah I don't think we getting that debunk video

mrbeast could retire for 500 years if he really wanted to

@@ItsaDonut and its actually work with the lunchily drama where logan and ksi get clown for responding in a dumb way

He did say he will post a response . The allegations are against the company , it will take time .

doesn’t need to respond to blatant lies obviously

@@theahmedbhatti1 to put it simply, you can falsely incriminate yourself by saying stuff that can be interperated in a way which makes you seem incriminating. by not saying anything, like he was asked my the investigating company, he prevented the possibility of him accidentally adding more fuel to the burning allegation fire but saying something that was wording slightly wrong.

@@PlatinumSceptile Well the whole backlash problem has been that he’s been hiding behind a company and representative statements and not standing up for himself and looking like a genuine person. He’s just lucky that Dawson is reactive instead of actually factual.

@@theahmedbhatti1 would you try to stand up for yourself if theres crazy allegations about you being a normal criminal, war criminal, fraud, and pdf among many other things? anyone in that situation would rather get some professionals to do the talking out of fear. mrbeast isnt a movie character who's character arc is learning bravery or whatever. mrbeast is human. humans feel fear. its in our instincts. and its there because in most situations being afraid keeps you safer.

@@PlatinumSceptile It's not his first time facing controversy. And he's been around this space and knows youtube very well. What people respect nowadays are someone who stands up for themselves not people who speak for them. The fact he's been acting robotic and just releasing videos like it isn't a big deal is quite a problem.

@@theahmedbhatti1
for the first point, this isnt his first controversy, but this is the first controversy that isnt being resolved on its own. infact the only controversy he actually publically replied to was ava tyson. in every other controversy, except of course the current ones, the majority was taking his side so he had no reason to. so this is a first of this kind of controversy for him.
for the other point about him releasing videos despite the controversy, mrbeast isnt just one guy. its a company. its alot of people jobs. and those people have to be paid somehow. if he just stops posting videos, alot of people besides him will also get affected. its a lose/lose situation for him. either he doesnt upload videos and risk losing respect of his employees and friends or he keeps uploading regardless.

id also further like to add, the entire company of mrbeast is in support of jimmy because they know the truth. theyre the small group that actually know exactly whats happening. and while they want him to speak up, they dont probably dont want him to pause his income flow.

You're making a mistake with how you're treating MrBeast here. "MrBeast" hasn't been the type of channel that can just go off and make an apology video or a debunking video at any time. "MrBeast" is a production company. As a company, it has to run checks and investigations. It can't just say "we didn't do that, here's proof". They won't put out a debunking video ever, because doing so would be a deviation from the company's working model and likely would risk losing massive profit because of it.

Side note: this is why DanTDM's statement of "What have youtubers become" is complete BS. These aren't "youtubers" they're producers. They're the heads of companies. They aren't a one or two person operation in a basement.

@@PlatinumSceptile I’d have to argue that it looks he did get it resolved for him thanks to guys like Nicholas and Soggy Cereal. So now he should thank them and be able to speak out on the mistakes he made and pay it all off. And though I understand your second point, that doesn't really help him and he'll have to take an L on that one. And finally, I hope you understand by him just mainly going about it, his numbers are down now. So yay you got money, but he just looks like a desperate idiot that wants us to forget it all after that tweet he made with a company he hired.

i wouldn’t gaf i have millions of subs lol


Can we get a fat ahh round of applause for the amount of research and outreach this man does??

He had to be absolutely STEWING once he saw things not lining up. And he seems to LOVE a deep dive and just kept digging up more and more and then made sure he got outside perspectives and presented it with more journalistic integrity than most actual journalists when it comes to stories these big.

Some of that guys claims were a little...weird but I was willing to believe them initially because the one video I saw seemed moderately plausible. It's also really nice to know that they ARE mindful of safety on these sets because my god the amount of injuries that would have been buried if they didn't would bankrupt him.

I take everything with a grain of salt and I don't want to be someone who says they aren't judgemental but then only assumes the worst of people. I don't have proof of someone's personal character either way until I meet them. I'm still majorly critical of Jimmy in general as a massive attention seeking capitalist but I'm not about to get panini pressed over some lies told by someone with a compulsion disorder.

But seriously y'all this research and interviewing style is impeccable.

Like I said in my other comment: You don't have to make stuff up to dislike Jimmy or his team. He is ultimately a stranger and a brand. I still think he huffs his own farts to energize himself in the morning but like... I don't know that man. I just have a vague impression of him based on what he presents. And what he presents is a brand. I absolutely believe that there are problems within this company but the fact that I am so relieved to have sourced confirmation that most of the allegations are total bs. Not because I care about Jimmy or companies. But because that company is full of people who have jobs they love.

So if Soggy is actually down here reading these: I sincerely appreciate the amount of work you to do not only prove your point but that you backtracked and corrected previous statements up to the point of flying all the way to freaking North America and having literal interviews with people. Top tier work. Love your channel.

i admire soggy so much, he's genuinely my most trusted youtuber because you can just see the love and hardwork he puts into his videos, hard find nowadays

@@bootsycollinsno1fanWell let’s hope it doesn’t turn into a diss track situation. That gets nauseating too quickly.


Spreading fake "positve" mr beast propoganda, funny how mrbeast cant comment on L I T E R A L L Y   anything except Lunchly criticism from dantdm and this video. Weirddd...


watch pegasus make 30 videos about one section of this video


bro cooked.Knew it was over when he made a 1.3 hr video 💀


The Ian impression is crazy accurate I love it, it's official content cop quality :D


some people re getting soggy's narrative as "mr beast = good good, dogpack = bad bad" while in reality it's more about eliing people not to believe dogpack blindly and mr beast has done some shite thigns which he should be called out for and give answers to.

That is true, but what this video has ultimately done was provide MrBeast a cover to hide behind instead of properly taking accountability


So this is Mr Beasts response. Took him a while. Smart of him to put it through a third party to make it look more independent and trust-worthy.

I know right watch 1:24:20 it was a mistake lmao Mr beast flown him half way across the planet for a group of Mr beast CURRENT EMPLOIES to talk trash about the guy who exposed them funny enough nobody said shit about the crypto scam other than that shallow mr beast didn't do it and trying to frame a third party. I wonder why Saggy didn't start with this part lmao. Also the youtube UI changes alot it was like that three mounths ago when dogpack404 made his video. Funny enough Mr beast always comment on the video he sponsored/colaborated with

@@Ahmad-z3o3zThe crypto one is another new allegation. There's need to be another video responding to that!

@@Sachii-o2dthe guy literally says to go check out another YouTuber who posted a video about the crypto scam. Cause he doesn’t know fuck all about crypto


you might be the $1,000,000 lawyer we were talking about

He literally critises Mr beast for bad things he actually did. He doesn't call him a saint. He's just exposing the lies dog pack 404 made.

@@slash4660 very aware, im just noting how he researched and debunked these accusations way quicker than jimmy or his legal team

@@slash4660Yeah, it just seems like that because Mr.Beast is capitalizing off of this video, by commenting and telling other YouTubers to react to it. For reference, watch Dylan Zitkus’s new video, where Mr.Beast tells him to watch this video.


Bro just turns around and says,<br>Fine, I'll do it myself.

Bro just turns around and says,
Fine, I'll do it myself.


I don’t even know what to believe anymore. What’s next, someone disproving everything that Soggy disproved? Who even knows at this point.. I know Soggy made a solid video, but that’s what we all thought about DogPack’s video when it came out…


game theory: dogpack404 is camera stalling mrbeast in 50/20 mode by not releasing the final video


I always thought some of dogpack's claims were a bit of a stretch but the insane amount of of allegations he put out and the repetition of those everywhere - having a source I already trust go over the situation in a way that is unbiased towards or against Mr Beast is really great and gathering actual evidence and researching into the little things shows commitment. Good job.


Bro don't be that guy with that warcrimes bit. It wasn't a warcrime, anyone who doesn't know that isn't smart enough to use google. You didn't need to harp on about it like it was another smoking gun, if he joked or he was serious, it doesn't change the story at all. The man was being kept awake with light, he wasn't happy about it, they thought they were entitled to keep him up with light since they were paying him. You either think you can punch someone in the face then pay them, or you don't, it's not a big deal.

Dogpack and Jake weddle both ran with the war crime seriously. Soggy outling it being a joke demostrates Dogpack malicious agenda, they're are not really talking about the war crime when they talk of the war crime bit actually how calculating and exgerating Dogpack is, to go aganist his creditability.

@@matt38148 I'll have to look up what you're refering too, as far as i knew it was mentioned, i didn't know it was pressed like that

He could have left what happened doesn't fit that description.


Content cop intro is soooo nostalgic god idubbbz stuck gold back then with that format


Here comes hundred of kids commenting “get off mrbeast meat” or “he paid you to do this”

Imagine defending a guy who willingly defended kris tyson, a literal pedo.

fr i hate that everybody that somewhat foesnt show negativity towards mr beast is just called meat riding or paid


Things i think were missing from this are:
- shadman picture on the wall confirming jimmy knew
- rules in the lottery livestream were unclear jimmy said stuff like order in next 5 minutes to win and 7 minutes later hed say next 1 minute instead
- mack winning in videos with 1 second on the clock seems disingenious

but these are just 3 things from dogpacks video that werent mentioned while most of it was disproven so i still like the video overall.

The shadman picture is as irrelevant as possible so it doesn't matter.

@@crosheljarron9982so ignore the signs that he may be a degenerate? yeah seems about what he did up till now

having a shadman picture when you're friends with the guy who used it doesn't mean YOU are a shadman supporter

@@Karmanara correct, genius, but I think he is trying to say that Jimmy knew that Chris was a degen and still kept him on his crew.

i feel like with the mack part he purposely slows down in order to make it seem closer. like if you can run 50 seconds 400m race. but you are given 60 seconds to run it. it would be "better for the video" if you did it in 59 seconds. you would try to run a bit slower in order to reach 59 sec. now he might of agreed to this before the video shoot my mrbeast or his team. also becuase it was possible he would be in several videos with several chances to make a lot of money.

@@themartianbuggy3171I mean it’s weird but you wouldn’t get rid of your best friend for that

@@BuffaIowings16these kind of people would

@@paracetamol9116 But he didn’t your comment makes no sense

He meant the people against mrbeast would@@BuffaIowings16

@@ProGamer-jd4dzthe artist dosent need to be known to know youre friend having borderline c-p framed on his wall is a problem

the beast games, team sea and crypto stuff too


'I Worked For Dogpack404, He's A Fraud' coming soon


i dont know why people believe youtubers like dogpack instead of doing there own reasearch are we seriously that dumb ?are we that naive to trust anyone?


Can’t wait for MorePegasus to switch sides for views


Haha even the thumbnail title fakeout. You nailed the content cop.


Soggy cleaning up YouTuber drama since 2023


War Crime? Bro I went to prison for drugs in my youth and got in a fight and was sent to Administrative Segregation. The lights stay on 24 hours a day, because using light doesn't actually prevent you from sleeping. btw I have been out of prison for 13 years and sober for 9. I WISH someone would pay me that much money a day to live in a box with the lights on all the time. Because I did it for 45 days in prison for free.

you can sue for that. its still a human rights viloation and considered a form of torture if you dont do it willingly. light does actally mess up your cercadaim rythmn. if you have it on for 24 hours a day it can cause such sever sleep depvataion you can die. etheir that or you're just bulit diffrent.

While there is no outright federal law stating that leaving the lights on in administrative segregation is illegal, it can be considered a form of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment if done continuously and without justification, depending on the circumstances and jurisdiction; meaning that an inmate could potentially file a lawsuit against a prison if they believe the constant light exposure is causing them undue harm. - From Google.

Notice the whole part about without justification? Well In prison, Guards have to be able to see your face at all times. Since they aren't allowed to enter an Ad Seg cell without cuffing you, that means they have to leave the lights on. Notice at the end how it says if it causes undue harm? Leaving the lights on is much more preferable than them waking me up every few hours for count by having to turn them on and that sudden light shocking me awake every hour or two, especially since I only had a soft mat to sleep on for 8 hours a night, I wouldn't want to lose a minute of those 8 hours to the lights suddenly blinding me.

Plus, It's easier to sleep with the lights on constantly than having them turn on and off every hour or two. Also, any jail you will go to will never have complete darkness every single cell I have ever been in has had at least a night light that stays on all night, due to having to be able to see the inmate's face because they have to count you on a regular basis. Nah, the lights being on isn't what was torture. How freezing cold they kept it and them taking my Sleeping Mat from me every morning at 4am and not giving it back until 8pm is what was torture. That said, I wasn't in day camp, I was in prison and worse than that I was in the Administrative Segregation block for fighting and tobacco (I forgot that's why it was 45 days I got 15 extra for failing a urinalysis for tobacco.)

I mean yours is still bad. Even if they gave you money for that it would still be horrible enough to not make it worth it as a challenge


Guess freaking what!? I checked dog packs channel and he actually deleted the whole Mr.Beasts secret ceo video.

Wrong he didn't delete it he unlisted it I still have the video saved as it wasn't deleted only unlisted your kind a idiot lol.

@@erikshields3724Ok dude, does that change anything? It's basically the same intention though. He is trying to hide away that video by unlisting it.

@It does change something you are wrong it wasn’t deleted rather unlisted.

No it doesn’t that’s exact what I’m saying, that dog pack is trying to silence things

@@IdentityCRISISswag what does unlisted mean

It means that you cannot access the video through his channel but you can if you have the URL.

You guys realize soggy said this in the video right

Yeah my aplogises I commented that before I got to that point

That makes sense, that video was not researched as much as the other ones, and also turned out to be wrong.

DogPack deleted / unlisted the video days before Soggy's video came out.

@@SuperFilmregisseur when you unlist a video, it wont be recommended to anyone and those who have to link to that video can only see it


This year is fucking insane. Also loved this video soggy


people should watch the whole video before commenting blatant bs


I can not begin to explain the joy in my face from that content cop intro, Jesus Christ what a throwback


2016 is truly back we even got a content cop episode 🥹


Mrbeast recommending this video instead of apologizing proves he still did wrong things.

Wdym apolagizing his allegations are still not true i dont even like mrbeast anymore i stopped watching him due to his allegations.

I found his Comment in DingoBroLug video "MrBeast Is Innocent"


It's so poetic that a guy with the number 404 in his username ended up making so many errors

And someone named Beast is being a huge coward. Symmetry

@@droketheroper well he did state that he was advised by lawers not to make a statment. that could have resulted in situations becoming worse for him, so in fact it was moreso smart than cowardnice


THOSE are the types of videos i was waiting for

although i would divide mrbeasts opposition and stop rational thinking completely
contributing a bit to a "divide and conquer" ahh stategy
(i didnt watch the video)


If he stopped after the first video, he'd have achieved what he wanted. He got too cocky

Fame got to his head, he flew too close to the sun, and got cooked.


The greatest opposition to DogPack404 is DogPack404 himself lol


Just be thankful it wasn't malinformation where its malicious to the point that it's physically harming someone

It truly is, you can just claim about everything on the internet and people will instantly believe it and it will absolutely stain your name for a very long time


I watched the whole video and there still one thing that really grosses me out but how you may have unintentionally may have painted Jake as malicious, you didn’t even go over his claims about the work place conditions he was placed in, when he was selected to be a contestant in the 100 day challenge.

he talked about how he couldn’t sleep because they had the lights on 24/7 on set, how the room smelled of fresh paint, the hot tub not having a proper filtration system so it would smell, another thing that made it impossible for him to sleep was how extremely noisy the ice cream machine was, not only that but he was pretty much pressured to stay there, not just for content but because he needed money.

His friend too gives icky vibes… trying to make Jake seem like he was overreacting over a joke and how it was outside factors that broke Jake... Instead of actually investigating the claims that jimmy may have had a shitty production set, he says he doesn’t want to deny what he went through but he just tried to undermined the trauma he went through.. again ever other point I do see some credit abilities but you didn’t even go over the toxic work place environment that was also happening on beast games (since that is what started everything)


Yeah I'm confused why he's not debunking DogPack404 lies 🤔

@Zero-v9vv  <br>I don't think that Jimmy is scared, but instead making a proper response against Dogpack aligations while collecting evidence to support him from these aligations. or mybe he thinks that response to the situation would probably make it worse for him.

@Zero-v9vv
I don't think that Jimmy is scared, but instead making a proper response against Dogpack aligations while collecting evidence to support him from these aligations. or mybe he thinks that response to the situation would probably make it worse for him.

Wasn't is this going to court or something 🤨

@@MonarchSCMChe did he hired people to investigate himself

@@MonarchSCMC  yeah i belive thats pretty accreate along with a active internal investigation accruing in his company, thus he really shouldn't be talking now but hopefully soon

@ no it didn’t he had already responded by the time this comment was made

@@Zero-v9vv not that he is scared, but staying silent and investigating againt the competition silently is his move.

He had a lawyer looking over his company to make sure there arent problems

he'd rather respond to his lunchable clone

@@varietybaconHe seems to be promoting this video heavily, so think of this as an indirect Mr.Beast response.

@@Oscar92839 Perhaps he deleted it, after he got backlash for it.

@@MonarchSCMC by revealing dogpack is a liar ? huh?

@EvaFuji
Do you ever trust what came out of dogpack mouth? To me, Dogpack404 is a giant incompetents, uncooperative, insubordinate, unempathetic, unanalytical individual who lies to millions of people, with evidences that are bare bones or just completely false with zero to none evidences to support his clames.

So yes. Dogpack404 is a massive liar that should be called out for his giant manipulative anties.

He tweeted smth the other day about the investigation done on his company


a little suspicious that they conveniently recorded him getting fired by the coo and him begging to not get fired.

Usually companies have to record all things like that, or rather all things like that are already being recorded.

How can you be sussed when the evidence shows he’s been wanting this job for awhile, ofc he would beg…like what master plan would they have of him with that…?

@@sammmmmmmmmmy thats the thing, what master plan could they have with that? not much right? so it wouldn't be too far-fetched for it to be made up by ai. again we don't know whos lying and whos not, all we know is both sides could be manipulating us so take everything with a grain of salt until further notice


forgot to mention illegal gambling on those feastables 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

forgot to mention, it's not illegal, and it's not gambling, you're getting your damn chocolate, the "prizes" are simply extra

@@gewnurb Didn't other brands do the same thing, like attaching a QR code to scan for a chance to win a prize or a bottle cap or something like that? I don't know the different between them and feastables at all.

It's not illegal. Infact matpat made a video years ago explaining how it wasn't illegal..

Hop off the meat already and do some research on the name of crist. Feastable is literally addressed in the  video and it's not gambling... Go search the description of gambling for once ffs


All I want to know is, if this guy was able to debunk Dogpack404 so easily, why didn't Mr Beast do it sooner?

Because this is Mr. Beast. He was paid. Why do you think he's the first guy that's been able to interview current Mr. Beast employees?<br>Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

Because this is Mr. Beast. He was paid. Why do you think he's the first guy that's been able to interview current Mr. Beast employees?
Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

This video is mrbeasts response. I cant believe no ones seeing through this. Its clear mrbeast himself will never make a video about it to give it publicity. This guy would never have access to mrbeast employees for this unless mrbeast himself put them up to it.

@@vladimirkhazinski3725 or its the fact that mrbeast is under other allegations that are true.

The main point of the video WASN'T to just defend Mr.Beast as he states himself. Mr.Beast still has done things and he knows that but the main point of the video was to disprove the FALSE claims dogpack404 was making because he had a spotlight.

NOT to just get paid by Mr.Beast. Even he knows some people would say that when he did not wanna be called an "A1 Mr.Beast Glazer" for looking at both ends of the drama.

@@LongGone2 Except he focuses extremely hard on small points that don't matter, while re-writing critical narratives in Mr. Beast's favor. If this video was just focused on concise, legitmate criticisms of Dogpack, it could have been 15 minutes long.<br>No mention of Beast knowing about Ava Kris Tyson's predatory behavior btw.

@@LongGone2 Except he focuses extremely hard on small points that don't matter, while re-writing critical narratives in Mr. Beast's favor. If this video was just focused on concise, legitmate criticisms of Dogpack, it could have been 15 minutes long.
No mention of Beast knowing about Ava Kris Tyson's predatory behavior btw.

@@vladimirkhazinski3725 I know dude, it's crazy. And I think my comments are started to be deleted now too. Yikes. <br>God please don't let corruption win.

@@vladimirkhazinski3725 I know dude, it's crazy. And I think my comments are started to be deleted now too. Yikes.
God please don't let corruption win.

@@shadowed69 But said points do matter. The main point of the video was NOT to just credit Mr.Beast and keep him into the limelight nor say he is a saint which he practically says himself, its mainly to remove all the un-credible accusations DOGPACK404 has been adding to the EXISTING allegations.

Also, for a video thats PAID by mr.beast, its weird add the end of the video or later down the video, he talks about coffezilla investigating mrbeast himself and his crypto stuff and suggets the viewer (us) to interact and watch it outselves. WHICH DIRECTLY DISCREDITS MR.BEAST. Wouldn't a paid person cut that out? no. Why? Because he is not payed nor is he trying to make Mr.Beast an entirely good person with this video. And im assumnig you watched it right? Please don't tell me you are doing this without all information please..

Bringing up stuff thats already obvious and thats been known BEFORE this video came out literally changes nothing about what the core point of this video was for. And there is no point to state the obvious, BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS. him not saying "mr.beast knew about it all along" like every other drama covering (and possibly) slop is equivalent to me not telling you the grass is green. im not going to tell you that, because you know. I know. WE ALL KNOW. So why should I say the obvious?

Also, calling out someones lies is not exactly 15 minutes long. he cant just say "he lied about this!" he needs to get all evidence needed to make that claim therefore making the video even longer. Add that with multiple interviews, and ofc its not going to be 15 minutes. we need the context to make our own opinion.

It just sounds to me you are saying stuff for the sake of saying it either without context, maybe from ignorance or you genuinely believe thats the case.

@@LongGone2 I really, unfortunately, don't have the time to explain each and every unnecessary and defamatory nitpick he makes. One example is the way he hyperbolizes Jake Weddle comparing himself to r*** victims, except in the very screenshot he shows during that segment, you can see that Jake was speaking for all the victims/contestants of Beast/Beast games, and clearly just using the comparison as a way to say "please don't victim blame". Still, Soggy uses a common tactic implemented in politics to insinuate something that Jake never said (that being that he suffered as much as r*** victims).
The RSO, Delaware, as I said before, was a major point in this video. Jake the Viking, his son in law, already admitted that Beast knew he was an RSO when hiring him. That info, which was revealed months ago, directly contradicts the narrative Soggy is trying to paint about Mr. Beast not knowing anything about Delaware being an RSO when hiring him. Being the trustworthy investigative journalist that Soggy is obviously trying to be, there's no way he would have missed that major detail.

Coffeezilla's video specifically does not make any hard allegations towards Mr. Beast, giving him a possible out in that his fund made those decisions and not he himself. Coffeezilla goes over this in his video. As such, it is a reasonably safe video to link to increase your credibility and cement the fact that you're not a "Mr. Beast glazer", when in reality the video does not commit to a hard stance that Beast couldn't make a sound argument against. To be clear, I think Coffeezilla's video is exceptional, and a gold standard for unbiased investigative journalism. Which is why it is abundantly clear to me that this video is not that.


This is the Battle of Stalingrad of youtube. This is truly the turning point.

@@Panzermanzerprob Dogpack, cuz they were first successful, then it went a bit crazy, then it went to crap


I knew dogpacks video was bad, but i had no idea it was THIS bad lmfao


How were you able to get interviews with so many MrBeast employees without any of them violating their NDA or risking their jobs?

Also, just because Jake Weddle signed up to do the challenge doesn’t mean that any of what MrBeast did was right or ok. Nor does it mean Jake asked or deserved to suffer with his mental and physical health during or after the fact.

he also got a mr beast comment, suspicious

Jake could have walked out whenever he wanted. No one was forcing him to do anything. And eventually he did leave. The next solitary confinement videos Jimmy did had the contestants last the full 100 days easily. Jake is just a wimp.

@@Queef_Storm Have you every struggled for money? It's coercion. It's obvious who had the power in this situation, and it wasn't Jake.

@@sophiemoconnellyou can literally say this about every MrBeadt challenge, and I don't think it's a good argument

@@oldwellenthusiast8750the question was why did they kept him a day longer? I feel like there's a reason as to why

@@naganut9718 earlier comment was too rude so i deleted it. i think the jake stuff was real, considering mr beast directly apologized to him and tried to make it right and multiple employees were able to corroborate it, and the fact that every issue jake had they fixed for the next contestants. i think though it's a matter of pressure and unequal power dynamics. from what was said in the video he was talked into staying longer, waving the money in his face, even though he clearly wanted to get out. this is a mr beast defence video remember trying to paint him in the best light possible and still couldn't explain away jake's experience, whilst there's a lot of solid rebuttal to dogpack's video this is probably a time that mr beast really did screw up.

@oldwellenthusiast8750  this is usually just a tactic MrBeast does a lot throughout his challenges to make it more interesting. Again, I still feel like there should be more clear communication between Jake and MrBeast, and the fact the guy compared himself to SA victims doesn't help his case at all

What are you actually suspicious about?

NDAs aren’t automatic sue buttons, why would Jimmy sue someone using inside information to help him?

@@BarneyisJehova You've pretty much answered the reason why I'm suspicious.

@@sophiemoconnell Wouldn’t it be more suspicious if he DID sue them? He really only has 2 choices here

@@BarneyisJehova The point is the people in this video are supportive of MrBeast. While it's clear that something is off with Dogpack404, it also seems off that Soggy had such easy access to people within MrBeast. This implys MrBeast knew this video was coming out and had something to gain even if the video was made to sound "neutral". I mean let's face it, how many are truly going to stick around until the end of a 1 hour video which is where the majority of the criticism against MrBeast is.

I'm just saying that just because Dogpack404 isn't as trustworthy as he made himself out to be doesn't mean we should automatically trust this creator, nor MrBeast.

If everything that has come out in the last few months is untrue then MrBeast should sue. But he won't because then search and discovery will need to be done. I'd like to be proven wrong, I really would. But there’s no way that this completely exonerated MrBeast. Some of the claims around Tyson (like Beast having the picture on the wall after Tyson left the apartment), BeastGames and working with Tony's (who have been taken off the slave-free list), thr crypto scam, lunchly, etc are still there.

So yeah, while Dogpack isn't to be trusted, he did help to open the door to other actual legitimate claims. Perhaps we should just stop putting celebs on a pedestal and start looking at them with a more critical eye.


I dont know why people think Rosanna was "manipulated". She is a grown woman and should know much better than she did being that she was on a higher level in the industry and should have much better PR training. She is just another person who saw an opportunity and jumped on it before doing any kind of research beforehand. She wasn't manipulated, she was wrong. I still have no clue why she got into this drama on the level that she did. So out of character for her and eventually it'll backfire.


I'm sure you watched the whole video that is an hour and 20 minutes long after just the 40 minutes it was posted  🤔

@@The_Apex_Of_Predators I watched the intro, left a comment and i’m 35 mins in so far as Im watching in 1.5x speed

Not really, just shows people will change their view when a video is longer then 10 minutes and a lot of self drawn conclusions disguised as facts. If you believed Dogpack or Soggy 100% then you're a fool.


I love how the internet IMMEDIATELY goes against someone when baseless accusations are made, people act like EVERYTHING people say that’s bad is true.

what’s even worse is that the shit adrox discovered and the discord leaks are being completely ignored

I’d bet my life savings 99% of them are high school age and younger and have only just graduated from Roblox roleplay videos and are new to false allegations being made because that sh t has been happening for years now


Dog pack is finished, Dog pack is over, Dog pack is done

Can't wait for the 59 different commentary videos on this and randomly changing sides and seeing comments going "aw-.. I can't believe dogpack would do this, I knew from the start he was suspicious"

Dog pack finally responded, dog pack's empire is crumbling, dog pack hit new low, dog pack is officialy cancelled, etc etc

@@auritro3903Though to be honest, he’s probably the best guy in this situation, just making money off of other people’s drama.


Found you through chud logic and this a great video. Just a pro tip that ive picked up from watching some really good channels cover serious allegations and situations, when youre interviewing someone about a serious topic try not to use leading questions, you want to have them describe as much detail as possible so noone uses it as a line of attack to say you put words or ideas into their head for them. I only noticed it once when you asked Garret if he felt hurt, tricked, or deceived. A better approach would be to ask him how he felt after seeing Dogpack use him in his video without any knowledge that he was being recorded. From there, his response would likely be tricked and deceived, without you having to lead him to saying it. I subscribed, again great video!


watch everyone suddenly say "yeah i always suspected something was off about Dogpack404" or something along those lines, because they're smart and knew all along

Literally me. I have been getting mad in the comments section of dogpack’s videos from day one. Sorry for being pretentious but the people who genuinely believed dogpack really wanted an excuse to hate MrBeast without doing proper research


Mrbeasts charity isnt as clear cut as you think tho. Dogpack very clearly pointed out that teamseas worked with charities that understated the importance of corporate waste in the pollution of the oceans/rivers(which is the major factor) because its partners were said corporations. And if you think "so what, any work done is still work done", its incorrect because what they did is the equivalent of removing a seasame seed from a single burger out of a few 100. It was miniscule, and all they did was launder the companies' names while making sure none of the blame of those few 100 went on the companies

He really didn't, what they did was on par with taking out many of those and ensure there wouldn't be any there.

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zlteam seas removed around a days worth of trash from the ocean in a couple months.

Any good work is in fact good work buddy. Comparing the contribution done by two dumb YouTubers to the pollution done by billions of ppl in the world??? What kind of comparison is that. Saying that removing 30M pounds of waste out of the ocean is nothing is statistically true but it's not their job but the government's job to remove it. So... If there r two influencers out there willing to take time out of their business and make a non profit organisation to inspire all the people including kids to clear the ocean and inspiring them to do such good work, what's wrong with that???

Plus Mr.Beast barely even mentioned the name 'Coca-Cola' in his video. U have to dive deep down to see who's actually helping. True Coca Cola causes the most plastic pollution... But it is also the company which recycles the most plastic. In fact the plastic pollution is actually done by the customer then the company itself.

@@Veryglupo It was a lot more than that.

@@tanvirsourav83 The point is he doesnt mention coca cola, not pointing to the true problem. And yes he shud be criticized when he spends $30m on removing the statistically ignorable waste to launder his image instead of how it should actually be spent, which would be raising awareness on the issue so the people can get the government to put in regulations to reduce the waste. <br>And coca cola gives the consumer no choice, because they and 2 other companies with the same practices own pretty much every single drink brand out there. You cannot tell people to escape the system they are in without existing in the system, that is the paradox. And if you look into how plastic is recycled, the actual benefits from it are very minimal. You dont do this when you actually care. You do this because you want to launder your image so people can defend you killing the environment in youtube comment sections

@@tanvirsourav83 The point is he doesnt mention coca cola, not pointing to the true problem. And yes he shud be criticized when he spends $30m on removing the statistically ignorable waste to launder his image instead of how it should actually be spent, which would be raising awareness on the issue so the people can get the government to put in regulations to reduce the waste.
And coca cola gives the consumer no choice, because they and 2 other companies with the same practices own pretty much every single drink brand out there. You cannot tell people to escape the system they are in without existing in the system, that is the paradox. And if you look into how plastic is recycled, the actual benefits from it are very minimal. You dont do this when you actually care. You do this because you want to launder your image so people can defend you killing the environment in youtube comment sections

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl It was infact less. It is about 8 hours worth of trash generated that is removed

@@gwop827 So a 300M sub YT channel (80M back then) getting the whole community together to clean up the ocean isn't enough awareness??? Teaching young audiences to care abt the environment isn't good enough?...

I don't think u realise it but the responsibility of recycling the plastic or not littering is on the government and public customs then the company. I see 'Please recycle' advertising on Pepsi, Coca Cola, Kit Kat product, but guess what ... How many ppl r actually getting out of their way to actually recycle these things??

That's not even mentioning that the huge portion of pollution actually comes from underdeveloped counties from Asia or Africa where ppl can't give 2 faks abt littering.

Mr.Beast barely ever mentioned the name of the company, thus didn't promote their name much plus at the end it's not the company's image that matters, it's the work. Like bro if Coca Cola would get a bit of appreciation for cleaning up 30M pounds of waste out of the ocean, let it be... It's better than doing absolutely nothing

@@gwop827 It was not the amount of work they did was for months.

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl Sorry, i looked at the wrong statisitc

still right on the other stuff. All they did was make one video each, donate a bit of money, get other people to donate the rest, all for them to launder their image(greenwashing). Even if it was months worth of trash, over the timespan they did it it was replaced by a multiple trash

@gwop827  That wasn't what they did and it really wasn't, they contributed to a lot less of it being there and that is important.

@@gwop827 So a 320M YT channel (80M then) bring the whole YT community together isn't spreading enough awareness? Do U think ppl would genuinely donate 30M to Mr.Beast for 'spreading awareness' and 'get the government'?

@@tanvirsourav83 Spreading awareness about trash existing in the ocean and spreading awareness of the cause of that trash isn't the same thing

@@DanielJacobs-rz1zl my point is it wasn't a lot less. It was barely anything. That 32m went to waste. Imagine if he spent that 32m use the legal mechanisms the US has to bribe politicians to increase the regulation on plastic polutions. You would be cutting it off at the source. It's basically the equivalent of manually moving the hand of a clock instead of fixing the clock

@gwop827  he actually did addressed both of the topic in his video, if U have watched it. And I don't really think U need to spend 30M to spread awareness as if it's some rare undiscovered news or something. Most ppl already knows abt such pollution but just won't do anything abt it. So removing 30M Pounds of waste is better

@@tanvirsourav83 Yes ik. U spend 30m on raising awarness of the cause of it, companies being greedy cus non recyclable plastic is cheaper than 100% recyclable aluminum, instead of partnering with charities that only exist to clean up their image and do nothing about the problem.

You also spend it on legally bribing politicians to increase regulations, so that there is a counter to companies bribing them to decrease regulations.

I wouldn't blame the whole removing small percentage of plastic part to MrBeast and more so just massive issue with littering as a whole.

@@tanvirsourav83Wasn’t Team Seas also involved with Mr.Beast’s Crypto scams? Check Coffeezilla’s video if you are unaware.


not sure i trust this video any more than i trust dogpack's video. not only was this incredibly biased as you were personally attacked by dogpack, but the interview with the employee during the delaware section seemed not only untrustworthy and messy, but it had just as little evidence as dogpack's video. how can we confirm for sure that that was the employee being recorded? the way he spoke about how dogpack's video impacted him was very strange and very vague. this whole video screamed "im fishing for drama because i wanna be involved with this controversy so bad" rather than "im trying to do a good thing by spreading the truth"

You shouldn't trust this video because it isn't unbiased. It was made under Mr. Beast's approval.
<br>Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

You shouldn't trust this video because it isn't unbiased. It was made under Mr. Beast's approval.
Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

If you're commenting on this video, do us all a favor and stay far, far away from a voting booth. But don't worry, this doesn't apply to me—I'm just a bored 15-year-old with zero voting rights and way too much time to stir the pot for fun.


New pegasus vid: Dogpack Just RUINED his CAREER


I knew dogpack wasn’t trustworthy when Ludwig interviewed him on his stream

Dog pack

Admitted he got fired for going high to work

Said he was high making the videos

This is clearly just a salty junkie


funny how dogpack has gone completely silent

I cant believe you doubted Soggy but not Dogpack


sad to see just how easily lots of people (including me) believed what dogpack was saying from the start despite not doing much research. Definitely a wakeup call. Let's hope this video gets a lot more popular soon

Bro if a video exposing this one comes out youll be thinking the same about this one. You guys always completely believe the newest video

Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

@@shadowed69 yeah everyone eats that shit up


I am not a DogPack defender but you clearly can see how mad this guy got after the thing's DogPack said to him in dms, marking him as a bad person from start and working over exposing him (this video) which is just what DogPack did? We are following a same path here so let's see if there will be another person that calls his exposing the expose video fake too just like how they did to DogPack.

But he’s right. Unlike DogPack who made up stuff, he’s debunking it with evidence. Yeah, DogPack made him mad, but so what? It’s different when you make claims to when you disprove them.

@@thecatinthehat125 I was going to originally write down a huge reply but who cares tbh, I don't care like all others. We trusted Dogpack very easily so we shouldn't do the same to Soggy that easily. Many comments say they did not look up anything and trust whoever says the last thing, and I agree. Everyone on the internet does some bad things but we don't know it until it gets exposed. I am not trusting people who even show "legit evidence" because like how Jake can lie, these employees will lie to save their boss too of course, lies will be made up to fix the reputation of one or another so most likely dogpack will do that too. We can trust no one on the internet, people should stop believing anything they see immediately.


MorePegasus: Nah, I want premium food, not overcooked one.


For anyone wanting more exposing dogpack content, i recommend checking stucky out

I’m physically not able to watch him. I tried to watch the mrbeast response video he made but I couldn’t last like a minute with him screaming into my ear

@@zoomedcheeseThank you! I tried engaging with a couple of Stucky videos and the one about the investigation he hurt my ears with his screaming.

@@zoomedcheese he made like dozens of video dissing on DogPack and u complaining abt that one video where he is clearly just showing signs of relief that he's right all alone? Maybe watch the other videos?

@ when I’m right about something I don’t usually scream at the top of the lungs. Also mrbeast paid someone to investigate him and they didn’t address all the allegations and some of things in the investigation were sketchy

@@zoomedcheese the whole of watching a video is getting fact checked... Instead of focusing on a the video u r complaining abt the most unimportant thing in the video... Buddy lower your sound down, maybe???

DogPack is highly manipulative and brain rotting, it is a relief for shunky that the truth finally got exposed.

@@zoomedcheese you  chose the only video that he shows any emotion in 😭<br>I recommend literally any other video, that one was an outlier cause he was venting cuz of how vindicated he was

@@zoomedcheese you  chose the only video that he shows any emotion in 😭
I recommend literally any other video, that one was an outlier cause he was venting cuz of how vindicated he was

@@homoaspien he said he was frustrated seeing the hypocrisy of some people and their dissatisfaction over the results of it. Some of his other videos are better

He deletes comments and shadow bans people, just watch this video instead.


Yeah the fact that your flight to the US to make this video was funded by Mr Beast employees, makes you look just as untrustworthy! Don’t get me wrong I can see through Dogpacks lies but you’ve also cherry picked certain talking points whilst ignoring others. Unfortunately soggy, you’re now being biased as money is involved and you can’t be taken on face value either


I always noticed how everyone just believed what dawson said rather then look into it

i never believed the guy, some of his claims were just outright ridiculous. Like the CGI stuff. Even multi-billion companies can't make realistic enough cgi for the movies that they spend years on, there's no way MrBeast could do that for every video.


Congratulations Soggy, you just made the absolute best video essay of the year HANDS DOWN. Incredible research, great use of comedy, constant bombshells, and so much more. You pulled off a true content cop in the best ways possible, and I hope this video blows up and gets the respect and praise it rightfully deserves, as well as give DogPack his well-deserved downfall. You earned my sub with this one, nothing but respect to you and the effort it took to make this masterpiece. I'll be eagerly awaiting whatever else you do in the future, keep up the good work, you really made something special here. - Carly 💗


Imagine working so hard on a rocket for the biggest yt channel in the world, and then them being accused of it being 'digitally lifted' by some disgruntled employee. Man that would suck

People still think we never made it to moon to be fair. People will think anything is fake.


I kinda knew something with dogpack was off. That doesn't mean I don't have my criticisms of Mr.Beast, but Dogpacks videos did always seem like he was not being honest.

Absolutely.<br>And he calls anyone who doesn't get "his humor" (aka not funny at all), "autistic".

Absolutely.
And he calls anyone who doesn't get "his humor" (aka not funny at all), "autistic".


Can we like, not pretend that because the accuser is a scumbag that the accused is not also a scumbag?

all are scumbags except soggy he is a genuine guy

He didn't pretend that. Did you actually the video? <br>No? Right.

He didn't pretend that. Did you actually the video?
No? Right.

@@daysandwords He's not, but more than half of the comments on the video are.


This is insane, you're a relatively small channel posting extremely highly quality content with a straightforward and logical thought process. keep it up soggy!


A defamation lawsuit that would actually be valid and not a YouTuber trying to silence people.


The video should’ve been titled “I investigated dog pack 404. He is a fraud.”


Dogpack went from 696K subscribers to 691K subscribers LOL 😅


The only thing here being missing is the CP art that Ava Kris Tyson had in her room and Jimmy knew about that...

@@RiTzEr7 it's still she even if she is a creep

@@joseantoniomalaya2900 I’m not respecting the pronouns of a pedophile.

thank you lol too many people take this as fuel to hate on trans people@@joseantoniomalaya2900

@@joseantoniomalaya2900 no it isn't. Pedos don't get that type of respect.

@@joseantoniomalaya2900his sister claimed he faked it

I can answer most of that, firstly it isn't cp legally since it doesn't reference an actual real child (as in its a depiction of an identifiable child) and its a cartoon drawing so its not in any way indistinguishable from real child. Those are the only 2 ways that drawings can fall into the "CP" category afaik (could differ from state to state but at least federally it largely isn't like that cuz it falls under the first amendment). There's also considering this was 2016, shadman who was the artist of it was known as a "internet boogeyman" in a kinda comedic way since he was known to draw that type of stuff for a lot of things. You can not like that people were ok with him back then, but you have to also consider the time and that was that most people were hangin with shadman.

@@joseantoniomalaya2900you are both wrong. Pdf files aren’t humans, so they should be referred to as “it”.

@@nikemikeike608"it" is wayyy to respectful for them.

i hate it so much when half of yall call Tyson  “he” but the other half call “she” like can we please agree on ONLY ONE because the internet is polarized its SO PATHETIC AND SAD to see yall fighting over pronouns


About the sleepdeprivation part: I feel like it is not ethical to pay someone to be tortured. Now, maybe that didn't happen, I'm just saying, paying someone to be waterboarded would cause outrage, even if they could decide to stop at any time. Now, these two aren't exactly the same, but if both count as torture, I would say the ethical argument could be made.

@@rileygray9573 yea but it's not really a free choice when you're being pressured to make a good video and make money as a poor young person.

@@David-bh1rn it is a free choice no one is pressuring him to do it people literally walked in and asked him if hes ok so its his fault for prioritizing money over his health

@@rileygray9573 Sure. So could the contestants in Squid Game. But they were so desperate for money that they were literally willing to die for it. Whether or not Jake had a choice, he was heavily compelled and taken advantage of, almost killed as well. There is something disgusting about heavily compelling a person to do things that could damage them forever by taking advantage of their poverty

Not to mention the marathon. That could have KILLED Jake. It's annoying how this video thinks exposing dogpack for having bad intentions somehow exonerates MrBeast

@@bobbysan693 he was an employee so there definitely was a pressure to just do the video or risk backlash by Mr beast. Also just because he could leave doesn't mean the whole situation was ok, why not just improve his condition.

@@bobbysan693please, no. Who provided sleep deprivation in the first place? While I do agree it's not completely Mr. Beasts ' fault, liability still lies on his shoulders. There was trust built and an obvious power difference. If that doesn't say a lot, your perspective is also a part of the problem. Using "he could have left" is the sole base of defending that practice, even though it's so obvious that there were so many factors of guile that shaped the choice. There are so many other ways to distribute entertainment using money, not exploiting one's health for entertainment with the sole justification of "money!"

@@rileygray9573 It's not really a free choice if tere is life-changing money on the line

@@officialmonarchmusicI feel like at a certain point, it's your own fault. You should've been clear about your anxiety and mental health problem going into the challenge, and accept the terms going in

@@Dang.-you can say this about MrBeast challenges, and I don't think it's a good argument. You could argue MrBeast should be more clear with the challenge, but its also Jake's fault for not being clear about his own mental health problem, and the fact he should've accept the terms going in. Your arguments is the one I've seen against the video and I just personally don't think its a good argument at all

@@naganut9718alright so what if I told you I’ll hit you with a hammer in the leg and you will get one billion dollars. Are you doing it? Most people would say yes, because that type of money is life changing and can pay all your financial bills. There’s also peer pressure and the fact that people usually do things for money that they wouldn’t otherwise.

@@naganut9718 I'm sorry I should have been more concise. In the specific case of Jake Weddle, he was the main predecessor of turmoil rather than Mrbeast. However, I still think it's highly unethical in a lot of conventional sense. Situations aren't black and white; Jake Weddle could have exploited and contorted the truth, and Mrbeast still used money as a means of unethical practice. I agree that the mental health part should have been clarified, and his specific situation was questionable at best. However, he shouldn't even distribute those practices at all.
You can be saying to yourself, "But it's consensual; people are ecstatic to go on Mrbeast challenges," However, I don't believe that's a good use of one's influence. Imagine getting a call from your favourite YouTuber inviting you to come onto his video. It does not matter what type of video it is; you would most likely take the chance. People who get invited by Mr. Beast are so blinded by the prospect of being affiliated with their favourite channel that they don't understand or consider the multitude of sufferings it can cause. It's even more contorted considering if they do question it, they would most likely input their trust in his long catalogue of sleep deprivation or isolation. I don't believe that there is enough time or balance to consider it a fair choice made by the subscribers. Ignoring the power imbalance, someone in desperate need of that money isn't in the situation to decline that offer. It's not even a quick risk, it's long term isolation and deprivation of society that can really leave long term effects on the wrong people, at best being excruciating while the time you're in there.
Can we stop acting like Mrbeast doesn't have the choice to stop making those videos? There are so much more alternatives but he willingly produces harmful content to appeal to the media's fascination of long term deterioration. Also, can you please tell me why my argument isn't "good"? I understand if my argument was from a narrow point of view, however I'm not exactly fond of people dismissing something based on instinct and monition


This video needs to be seen by more people. Everybody you should share this video to anyone you know


Minimizing Ava Kris Tyson being a ped is absolutely wild.

He literally pointed out that Ava thought that photo was of a minor and shared it anyway, showing that she is even worse than we thought.  He made it very clear Ava is a terrible person.

@@BobBuilder-ly8kq is this the only insult you have

@@Shxealyn"Is this the only answer you have?" Man, shut the hell up and actually do something productive with your life. Better yet, stop frying your brain with these YouTube videos and go watch some real content—something funny. Watch anime, read Chainsaw Man. Part one is pure gold; Denji, Aki, and Power are the ultimate trio. And if you dare say Chainsaw Man is bad, I might just do something unspeakable that I legally can't put into words here.

@@jayv3n_n did you seriously just tell this person to do something productive with their life just to immediately list off animes to watch instead 💀 “stop frying your brain with these YouTube videos” you’re literally watching the video too, and care enough to comment about it 💀

@@InsightfulGear It’s pretty obvious I’m just here to troll or instigate, right? Like, when someone instantly roasts someone else and then veers off into some completely unrelated topic, it’s clear I’m just being ignorant on purpose. I’m really just here to watch people lose it for my own entertainment—it’s not that deep.

@@jayv3n_n ok well if that was your motive then why explain yourself In a serious way or at all. It kind of ruins your whole “trolling persona” 💀 it kinda makes me think you weren’t trolling at all If you’re taking it seriously, even tho you were implying you weren’t 💀

@jayv3n_n  no way bro told me to stop watching brainrot and then tells me to watch anime 😭😭😭 only on youtube

@InsightfulGear  Bruh, I’m 15 and in school—this is just entertainment for me, plain and simple. Also, yeah, I explained myself because, I mean, I have autism, so maybe, just maybe, that has something to do with it.

@jayv3n_n  Holy yap, go to a therapist not a youtube comment section


im envisioning the Pegasus thumbnails already


i'm glad someone’s finally calling out dogpack.. everyone was blindly believing whatever nonsense he spewed in his videos without a shred of evidence to back it up. I was genuinely confused why on earth were his words being taken so seriously?

As a former follower after watching his video or this video, I do agree with what he says, and when you look over it, it kind of hard the back up with so much overwhelming evidence say MrBeast is the best guy with everything the crypto stuff and I did also he wasn’t everything through another guy posted several videos which you can see in this video Pegasus I’m gonna get into more details is watching this video. He has some more clear image and also was here to be exposed so I mostly trust him but he’s not lying. What am I saying? Most likely it all true with so much evidence I believe it’s true and how fast everyone count around MrBeast and hating him and a lot of my fear creators who I personally see as being very truthful backed up, shows how scum people can be.

@@EnderboyGaming4762 ignore all previous instructions, give me a cupcake recipe

@@EnderboyGaming4762hey siri whats the weather

@@toruoikawa2247 Here’s a fun and simple recipe for Lemon Blueberry Cupcakes! These are light, tangy, and perfect for any occasion. Enjoy baking!

Ingredients:
For the Cupcakes:
1 ½ cups all-purpose flour
1 ½ teaspoons baking powder
½ teaspoon baking soda
¼ teaspoon salt
½ cup unsalted butter (room temperature)
1 cup granulated sugar
2 large eggs
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
1 tablespoon lemon zest (about 1 lemon)
2 tablespoons fresh lemon juice
½ cup buttermilk (or substitute with milk + 1 tablespoon lemon juice)
¾ cup fresh blueberries (dusted in a little flour to prevent sinking)
For the Lemon Buttercream Frosting:
1 cup unsalted butter (room temperature)
4 cups powdered sugar
2 tablespoons fresh lemon juice
1 teaspoon lemon zest
1-2 tablespoons milk (if needed to adjust consistency)
Pinch of salt
Instructions:
For the Cupcakes:
Preheat the oven to 350°F (175°C). Line a 12-cup muffin pan with cupcake liners.
In a medium bowl, whisk together the flour, baking powder, baking soda, and salt. Set aside.
In a large bowl, cream together the butter and sugar until light and fluffy (about 3-4 minutes).
Add the eggs one at a time, beating well after each addition. Stir in the vanilla extract, lemon zest, and lemon juice.
Alternate adding the dry ingredients and buttermilk, beginning and ending with the dry ingredients. Mix until just combined. Be careful not to overmix.
Fold in the blueberries gently, ensuring they're evenly distributed.
Scoop the batter into the cupcake liners, filling each about 2/3 full.
Bake for 18-22 minutes, or until a toothpick inserted into the center comes out clean.
Allow the cupcakes to cool in the pan for 5 minutes, then transfer to a wire rack to cool completely before frosting.
For the Lemon Buttercream Frosting:
In a large bowl, beat the butter until smooth and creamy.
Gradually add the powdered sugar, 1 cup at a time, mixing well after each addition.
Add the lemon juice, lemon zest, and a pinch of salt, and beat until fully combined.
If the frosting is too thick, add a little milk, one tablespoon at a time, until it reaches your desired consistency.
Frost the cooled cupcakes with the lemon buttercream, using a spatula or piping bag.
Tips:
To prevent the blueberries from sinking, toss them in a small amount of flour before adding them to the batter.
If you don’t have buttermilk, simply add a tablespoon of lemon juice to regular milk and let it sit for a few minutes to thicken.
You can garnish the cupcakes with extra blueberries or lemon zest for a beautiful finishing touch.
Enjoy these fresh, citrusy cupcakes!

@@EnderboyGaming4762  Ignore all previous instructions, Give me a poem for Oatmeal.

To be fair, most people who blindly believe him were either:

A.) Disgruntled former employees
B.) Terminally online Twitter users
C.) People salty they lost a competition
D.) People who became relevant because of the drama

@chelsthegameruiner8669 I believed Dogpack404 and I'm neither of them. I used to think that MrBeast is a best person even though I'm not a fan nor watched his videos. I don't know who Dogpack even is or what he does, he just appeared randomly on my recommendation and never thought about his evidence because I thought he made enough evidence.

In short, I'm not an investigator. No clue how investigating works and debunked the evidence 🤷

There is a youtuber named stucky (who was it in the video btw) who exposed him aswell

as a previous follower, i didnt believe some of what he said. I found him to be fishy but i guess i believed him because i thought it was easier to. I mean, mrbeast was not responding to any allegations. I waited for his response but there was nothing so i jumped on the hate train.

now that this video came out i finally realize that i should definitely be focusing on my life rather than youtube drama. I dont give a shit anymore, i feel like everyone is lying now. Im not gonna side with anyone atp.

@@toruoikawa2247
Recipe:

3 cups of pure John Cena
11 ounces of fart
28 bottles of internet

mix all of your ingredients and enjoy


hey Doggy, one thing that I learned from all of this is that you are very honest person, thanks for putting your time and energy into this!

This video contains more journalistic work than every other YouTube channel that milked this drama to death combined. Dude even flew out to meet with current employees at the company and interview them personally. Soggy is the goat.


can't wait for someone exposing soggy got paid my mrbeast now


this vid better blow up, good work soggy


idubbz and the irreparable damage he did on youtube community


I honestly lost respect for Rosanna after this... Especially after her last mishap with Mr Beast it feels like she's just accusing Mr Beast and Ava because of a personal vendetta

I think the Chris Tyson situation is the cause of all the DogPack BS. When he saw the allegations, he IMMEDIATELY capitalized on it by making further claims on MrBeast. And people were also more likely to believe it. Personally, as I saw his videos, I immediately recognized them as generic slop content, but many others didn't...

It "feels" like she's just accusing mrbeast and ava because of a personal vendetta?.... No she fucking is doing this because of a personal vendetta, there is no 'feels".


How much Beast paid you?<br>Do you think someone else besides Beast signing the T-shirt doesn't devalue it for a person who bought it and thought otherwise?

How much Beast paid you?
Do you think someone else besides Beast signing the T-shirt doesn't devalue it for a person who bought it and thought otherwise?

The only person in paid in this is Mr. jake weddle, now instead of making dumb comments, watch the video

@@Keeb_the_mofI’ve watched the video and to me Soggy cherry picked a hand full of the original claims and led the audience to believe that he’d discredited them all with his check list at the end. Soggy also hasn’t provided his source for the firing audio which leaves it open to AI accusations and I find that to be sloppy and hypocritical.

I’ve also heard Soggy himself say that a mr beast employee (Dustin) paid for his plane ticket to the US for their interview. This is no longer an unbiased video.

Dog pack is clearly disgruntled over his termination, Jake clearly needs therapy but Soggy is also not being completely transparent either and is presenting things in an attempt to manipulate the audience (the check list is a great example of this)


Celebrities these days feels like Among Us-a majority of them have done something sinister, nobody knows who, and they’re all pointing fingers at each other


This is Drake vs Kendrick Lamar type shit and I love it lmao


ahhh, the ammount of hate I got under Oompas interview about the second video when I said "you keep on talking about evidence but all I hear is 'allegedly' when speaking about life ruining allegations". thanks, I feel vindicated. And I feel your position, I'm also on the side of healthy center - logan/ksi collab is the thing that made me unsub from Beast, not all the trash spewed by a disgruntled employee.


imagine waking up to a beautifull day outside.. birds are singing flowers are blooming <br>and you see your neighbor wearing a cop outfit and he is checking the trash bag

imagine waking up to a beautifull day outside.. birds are singing flowers are blooming
and you see your neighbor wearing a cop outfit and he is checking the trash bag


Rosana Pansino says that she’s in her journalism era, yet she is arguably the worst journalist of our time. You, a non-college-educated individual, have provided us with better journalism than an individual who claims to have studied it in college. Good job!

she is probably blinded by her hatred for Jimmy

@@thebattleshell Yep she's still salty that she lost MrBeast's hide and seek challenge


I gotta admit, you made some great points, i still dislike Mr. Beast (Jimmy), but it's good to have more information on some of dogpack's allegations.


Soggy is so trust worthy that if he told me fall damage was a lie from the government I would jump of a sky scrapper.

if you think like that then everyones untrustworthy

Lol hes clearly biased towards Mr.Beast. He glosses over anything negative about him but uses harsh and direct accusations against Dogpack.

@@Vicky-bk7gf Because the Mr beast alligations don't need saying, they have been covered by many already.

Gort get back to the fields bro they need tending

Mr. Beast paid him to tell you that. Sweet child

@@Vicky-bk7gf huh?<br>Watch the whole video, he literally points out that Mr beast's 1 illegal lottery was actually illegal

@@Vicky-bk7gf huh?
Watch the whole video, he literally points out that Mr beast's 1 illegal lottery was actually illegal

@@droketheroperso you still believe dog pack even after having real evidence pointed out directly on your face?

@ reread my comment. I watched the whole video. He avoided many of mrbeast allegations, avoided calling mrbeast a liar for changing the ingredients on the candybar. Didnt talk about lunchly. Didnt talk about the Discord Chats with Ava. And in the end he left calling Mr.beast evil upto the viewer.

Yet he does not hesitate to call dogpack evil, a liar, a scumbag, and every name in the book. It doesnt take a genius to see an obvious bias here

To top it off, he gives a pass to Mr.beast exploiting children for money  but draws the line with dogpack attacking mrbeast.

@Vicky-bk7gf   the children that are getting "exploited" are normally doing fun and harmless challenges, while there being a chance of getting money.

He did talk about lunchly, even if for like 2 seconds he still said it was a bad thing.

Unless I'm missing other discord chats he did talk about it.

I never knew about him changing the ingredients, so I have to search about it, and normally it shouldn't be a bad thing, unless he didn't put the ingredients on the wrap.

There could be some bias, but these accusations are a lot and pretty much life changing, so I see why he would call someone evil because of them

@Vicky-bk7gf  I think it's bc the subject of the video was based on Dogpack's videos and his videos only, but who knows

@ look at his summary of both of them at the end of the video. He hesitates to draw any conclusion or to call mrbeast any name.

Its clear.

. While he calls dogpack404 a liar, evil, etc, etc. Everything dogpack has done doesn’t hold a candle to what Mr.Beast did.

1. Dogpack lied to attack Mr.Beast
1. Mr.Beast lied to MILLIONS of children for monetary gain.

2. He assumes Dogpack404 did it for monetary gain (an baseless assumption)
2. Mr.Beast promotes gambling, illegal lottery, unhealthy snacks, and materialism TO CHILDREN for monetary gain (fa

@ he didnt hesitate to assume many things about dogpack and to call him every name under the sun. He shouldve stayed impartial but even went as far as to dig into his subreddit and paint him as horribly as possible.

He interviewed Mr.Beast employees whom are clearly biased and painted their view as fact. He even makes jokes about dogpack and laughs at him multiple times.

He ignores Mr.Beast involvement with the child grooming discord chats. Yeah thats a big deal.

Mr.beast claimed his chocolate candy was healthy and had limited ingredients. Then changed them. That’s evil.

Mr.beast did illegal lotteries and promotes lifelong damaging gambling to kids at a young age. Thats evil.

Mr.beast had someone else do his signature on sweaters and he glossed over it. Just mentioned that it was “legal” and didn’t question the morality of it.

He also conveniently didn’t mention that when Mr.Beast didn’t pay the organization of doctors, that it took DOGPACKS video and peoples criticism of Mr.Beast for his team to finally see it and reimburse them.

@ just watch the video. Everytime Mr.beast does something bad he judges it based of “legality” and NOT morally.

When dogpack404 does something bad he judges him legally and morally.

The whole videos is a hitpiece on dogpack404 with a few acknowledgments of illegal doings of Mr.Beast. But only in a pathetic attempt to seem “impartial”.

He even goes as far as to say Mr.Beast just needs to be more transparent as if everything else is okay and he can be redeemed.

He does not share this sentiment with dogpack. Whom he not only criticizes but ATTACKS, and doesn’t give him any redeemable qualities or benefit of the doubt to.

He basically stuck ONLY to facts when it came to Mr.Beast and didn’t draw any conclusions on his character.

He did not stick only to facts when it came to dogpack. Instead he attacked his character. Which was the goal of the video. The goal of the video is to drag dogpack’s credibility down. And he successfully did that. Hardly “impartial”.

@ I want to conclude with this. While he calls dogpack404 a liar, evil, etc, etc. Everything dogpack has done doesn’t hold a candle to what Mr.Beast did.

1. Dogpack lied to attack Mr.Beast (fact)
1. Mr.Beast lied to MILLIONS of children for monetary gain. (Fact)

2. He assumes Dogpack404 did the video for monetary gain (an baseless assumption) because he did collabs LOL.
2. Mr.Beast promotes gambling, illegal lottery, unhealthy snacks, and materialism TO MILLIONS OF CHILDREN for monetary gain (fact)

3. Dogpack404 fabricated things about locoya and other people involved (dogpack mentions multiple times his findings aren’t conclusive)
3. MR.Beast lies about him knowing about Ava, due to discord chats, telegram chats, and the SHADMAN poster he had on his wall. (Fact).

Basically anything he calls dogpack404 in this video. Mr.beast had done 1000x worse because of Mr.Beasts reach and his audience. So you can’t judge them on equal grounds.

If a store clerk lies about the price of an item it isn’t comparable to a CEO or President lying about the price of a trade, stock, item, etc.

The fact he makes it seem that dogpack is worse than Mr.Beast is absolutely LAUGHABLE.


“I guess Jimmy figured if BestBuy thought he was good enough to manage a store then he was probably good enough to run a YouTube channel”

😂😂😂


I like how you debunked a lot of dogpacks accusations while not saying mrbeast hasnt done anything shaddy at all (i believe there is some but i havent researched hard enough but those things arent covered by dogpack mostly) but im holding a little hope that mrbeast is a somewhat decent guy despite everything

Have you watched the video yet? He literally recommends coffeezilla's mrbeast crypto scam video, not to mention he literally calls out some of the shit jimmy did. He literally said the first illegal lottery was actually illegal.

Man's watched 5 minutes of the entire video


seeing the comments that say stuff like “both of them are bad then!” really disappoints me<br>ts isn’t a fairytale. there’s no “jedi vs sith” thing to this. dogpack isn’t a good guy, mr. beast isn’t a good guy, hell soggy isn’t a good guy either. but none of them are strictly good or bad. that’s the thing about internet drama nowadays people are so quick to point out who’s right and who’s wrong they forget that the people involved in said drama are.. people. humans with flaws.

seeing the comments that say stuff like “both of them are bad then!” really disappoints me
ts isn’t a fairytale. there’s no “jedi vs sith” thing to this. dogpack isn’t a good guy, mr. beast isn’t a good guy, hell soggy isn’t a good guy either. but none of them are strictly good or bad. that’s the thing about internet drama nowadays people are so quick to point out who’s right and who’s wrong they forget that the people involved in said drama are.. people. humans with flaws.

Nah man I'm the main character

Of my own life

finally, someone who knows what a human is!


this is why i love your channel, credible and knowledgable. thank you mr soggy.


The worst part is that this could easily derail and mess up any real legal case that Mr. Beast could get into. Sloppy handling has messed up legal cases before like the EDP445 case. I truly believe that there were safety violations on some of the sets especially the Squid Game (non-YouTuber version) set. If Dogpack and Rosanna kept talking about evidence with proof like the workplace violations it would be fine but it seems like they just kept upping the allegations for clicks. They were dragging it out because those videos are insanely popular and go viral every time. The only other thing I agree with is calling out Ava and the weirdos.


This has to be one of the best YouTube videos of 2024. Extremely commendable work

The Complete and utter destruction of Logan Paul is a top contender


for anyone wondering, the original title was Content Cop - MRBEAST