based on what I'm seeing before I watch, this seems pretty suspicious, mr beast's team had avidly avoided making any response to the heavy hitting accusations and has only put out the most corporate responses, but somehow mr beast responded to this and you got interviews with direct employees? suspicious.

Soggy literally proved mrbeast did an illegal lottery lol, would be weird to call out someone for doing illegal shit when doing "PR" for them

@JulieWooly-pn6tx  would it though? Its ome of the irrefutable pieces of evidence while also being one of the lesser evils, admitting that while discrediting the guy who made all the allegations in the long run makes it seem less true too.

@@nineexists6621So since he got actual interviews with employees with permission from the people interviewed. Doesn't it make sense that he would more likely get to the truth of the situation. Would this video be less suspicious if he recorded employees without thier permission and put a voice changer of it? How do you make "unsuspicious" reporting?

@avalope  no it'd be less suspicious if these interviews happened with other people, but mr beasts team wont give anybody else the satisfaction of even a real answer, if they had responded to both coffeezilla and soggy cereal id understand it, but frankly this to me just looks like 1. Soggy cereal isnt a credible source, and 2. Mr beast is undoubtedly guilty (theres no other reason to aid a coffeezilla investigation, eapecially when he disagreed with a lot of what was accused about crypto scams)

@@JulieWooly-pn6txSame argument could be made for Dogpack. "Well the videos weren't monetized... so.."

Plausible Deniability. How could he be working for Mr Beast if he "proved illegal lottery"? See?

Hopefully you watch the video. Soggy's points have pretty bullet proof evidence. The Beast employees could be biased, but I trust them over the anonymous sources Dawson used who were all wrong about everything lmao

People should upvote this comment, so it shows for more people above

The fact that Soggy Cereal is a well-known channel and also not a former employee with known bias probably helped a lot with that.

"before I watch-" up up up, shush, and watch the video


What I don't understand is, well ok we have another youtuber defending MrBeast but.... If the majority of the allegations are false then why couldn't MrBeast himself address it if he really wasn't guilty of any of these. It really could've all been avoided so easily without him losing subscribers for instance.

not worth it, people wouldnt listen to him anyway so whats the point in trying

Its a bad idea in general, first MrBeast publicly talking about would put it into the eyes of his child audience, second why take the blow when it hasnt really hurt you, his sub count has only gone up and it doesnt look like its going down any time soon

Not defending MrBeast, just playing Devil's Advocate


bro actually hit the nail with this one. i watched the whole thing


How Dogpack wants to look like: Jason Todd.<br>What he actually is: fucking Syndrome from The Incredibles.

How Dogpack wants to look like: Jason Todd.
What he actually is: fucking Syndrome from The Incredibles.

Ye but he missing the McDonald hairline though


56:58 If random contestant is watching this, absolutely incredible beard, looks great


The only person who can confirm the allegations is MrBeast himself, since he refused to talk about it he seems somewhat suspicious.


Soggy ate, left NO crumbs, then wiped the surface clean afterwards


It's crazy how much effort you put into this and all the interviews and stuff you conducted to make sure you were getting the full truth. This rocks. Thank you Soggy

That's cute but he glossed over the whole Delaware thing (who was proven to be an RSO by Jake the Viking) by saying "durr the origins of the name are a lie". That alone makes the rest of the video suspect to bias.

@@droketheroper He literally said that hiring him was wrong, he was an RSO and regardless of his age at the time, Jimmy should be held accountable for his actions (5:28). Being critical of the other side doesn't mean you are biased. Considering the fact he was criticizing Mr. Beast as well, calling the first lottery illegal, makes him more unbiased than most other people covering this topic.

Also, if someone lies about the origins of someone's name because they were banned from entering a state (Which is incorrect), that absolutely makes you less believable and trustworthy about everything else you say after that


Now someone will make a video exposing soggycereal exposing dogpack404 exposing MrBeast 😂


Here’s the summary: MrBeast and DogPack404 are both horrible people

then burn your money, no one cares about your mental health lmfao

Actual summary: Jimmy gets cleared of 99% of allegations but he still hasn't responded to 1% so he must still be evil and we have learned nothing from all this


I know nothing about this drama and don’t care, but that intro ❤


There is two types of people in this comment section
Those who watched the video
and Those who didn’t watch it

There is two types of people in this comment section
Those who watched the video
and *Those who didn’t watch it*

Ong bro, there’s so many Fraudpack glazers repeating the same old “ HOw MuCH Did Mr. BEaSt paY YoU??”, like bro shut the fuck up already.

And those who watched the video and don't blindly fall for the fallacy of appealing to emotion technique :)
Most of you people are probably too young to even know what that is.

Emotion is temporarily, the internet lasts forever. Once the emotion passes we'll see from there and what comes out/what was true and what wasn't.
I'm VERY curious about that "audio" WITH ZERO VETTED SOURCES. Jake literally proved in this video at the time how easy it is to create and manipulate audio with AI.
If said audio was indeed in existence why wasn't it used from the very start? I find it hard to believe Mr beast would be forced to hire crisis lawyers and using shady tactics when he could've used that gatcha from the start.

I still don't know what the full truth is, but Mr beast is a bad person regardless of the situation in the end-- he doesn't need to be a mafia boss to be a shitty person.

Learn to use your brains properly people, I beg of you-- out there in your daily life you're on your own usually, being able to use your brain logically will save you so many headaches. People lie, people are shitty, people will try to gaslight you, learn to see the red flags.

The world is never black or white, plenty of interconnecting colors out there, and not all those colors are ones you can trust.

And those who watched the video and don't blindly fall for the fallacy of appealing to emotion technique :)
Most of you people are probably too young to even know what that is.

Emotion is temporarily, the internet lasts forever. Once the emotion passes we'll see from there and what comes out/what was true and what wasn't.
I'm VERY curious about that "audio" WITH ZERO VETTED SOURCES. Jake literally proved in this video at the time how easy it is to create and manipulate audio with AI.
If said audio was indeed in existence why wasn't it used from the very start? I find it hard to believe Mr beast would be forced to hire crisis lawyers and using shady tactics when he could've used that gatcha from the start.

I still don't know what the full truth is, but Mr beast is a *bad* person regardless of the situation in the end-- he doesn't need to be a mafia boss to be a shitty person.

Learn to use your brains properly people, I beg of you-- out there in your daily life you're on your own usually, being able to use your brain logically will save you *so* many headaches. People lie, people are shitty, people will try to gaslight you, learn to see the red flags.

The world is never black or white, plenty of interconnecting colors out there, and not all those colors are ones you can trust.


As far as I'm concerned, if MrBeast wasn't guilty, why was he deleting comments on his videos, trying to hide evidence, and discussions? Someone who's innocent, and can prove that innocence, doesn't try to hide accusations, because they know it can be disproven.

The point of the video wasn't to just say Mr.Beast hasn't done things, (because he has) the main point was dogpack was throwing some baseless and boneless claims at Mr.Beast that basically weren't true but were taken as gospel.
Main reason soggy knew he was also possibly going to be labeled an "A1 Mr.Beast Glazer".

Make no mistake. Mr.Beast has still done things and is possibly doing stuff we don't know right now.

@@LongGone2 dude you have replayed to about 20 comments you bored 🤣

@@DermotBrophy you have literally done so yourself

@@partynorskplayz3499 im bored as fuck 🤣

@@DermotBrophy ok so both of you are bored, thats fine?

@@DermotBrophy Both that and the fact stupidity floods the comments. You can move down and probably see 3-5 comments that have clearly either not watched the video, or are missing context. (Or possibly just plain stupid.)

That is why im responding myself.

@@LongGone2 im just getting a laugh outta this

@@DermotBrophy That's fair. its pretty funny seeing you in each comment section aswell

@@LongGone2 good laugh these comments that get triggered so easily keep it up man 👍

@@LongGone2 Honestly though, it's so baffling that so many people think that this video is supposed to vindicate Mr. Beast when what it primarily shows is that dogpack404 is untrustworthy. Anything else is just a cherry on top.

@@ablackbunny3149 exactly. its pretty strange

@@LongGone2 I don't recall ever saying anything positive about Dogpack.

@@cynicat74 Not specifically saying you or saying you are apart of that category.

Just saying people LIKE that are commenting on the video clearly missing said context.

(also pretty sure mr beast deleted the comment moment he realized it was not soggy just glazing him for an hour)


Stopped trusting Dogpack after his second video, glad my gut feeling is validated against the sea of opposition


This is the soggiest cereal I've ever seen


>Comes from Belgium >Point instantly dismantled


What I learn today, Jimmy Donaldson and Dawson French are both not good


thank you so much soggy, finding out Dawson lied about almost everyone is both a surprise and kind of expected at the same time.


Watch Pegasus ignore this video so that he can glaze Dogpack


The only thing that interested me was the accusations about MrBeast breaking the law with his lottery etc. All the stuff about faking videos and interviewing crying ex-workers who got paid a ton of money was  W E A K


1 hour soggy cereal video now you can have all my nuitrence


the dogpack cp thing was really weird to me<br>like you can't be having that either dogpack?!?!?!?!?!?!

the dogpack cp thing was really weird to me
like you can't be having that either dogpack?!?!?!?!?!?!

In his defense, it has been confirmed that it is not CP, so he is safe. And after all, this CP was alleged by Chris Tyson.

Yes but he confirmed it  wasnt cp after the video was posted so when he still thought ivanka ws 13, he was in possesion rossana used it in her thumbnail but ltr blurred it and he never mention ava alleged it

@@hellboy9458 He claimed it was though, so he did those things thinking it was CP.


Thank you for your work on this video. I'm ashamed to say I actually believed most of the accusations Dogpack made without checking some facts myself.

I had my suspicions aswell. but still, don't beat yourself up about it. we all make mistakes.

@@LongGone2 this is not a mistake its a crime committed by dogpack404


I went into this video thinking i wouldn't agree because so many have made the affirming video's but I am shocked at how well you disproved so much of dog packs lies...i truly hope that more people see the lies as what they are.  You are right that you cannot hold someone accountable for the things they have done wrong without first getting thru the rumors and lies.. And when people spread rumors and lies like this on purpose it invalidates the true crimes of the person.  Thank you for this video.. I am now subscribed:)


dogpack, cam nuggets, rosanna, jake and their group are so unimaginably malicious that makes me a literal psyop dude stunned

@@CamNuggetsyou're a grown ass man and still using womp womp??

@@gekkouga2828not to mention a giant hypocrite for censoring his comments section

@@CamNuggetswow so you just proved you watched this video by commenting, you going to address any of it or slither back under your rock hoping your audience won’t watch it?

@@ysmc2752defamation, he and the rest of his group took screenshots of group chats while knowing and purposefully being malicious using those screenshots, editing them, or using testimonies of employees that were joking it’s all defamation and if you can’t realize that then sorry buddy you were the mark and it worked

What did Rosanna do? She merely forwarded the ‘evidence’, she never participated in malicious exposing mrbeast

@@thetacticalguy62 so she didn’t go on Nicks live stream while he was exposing the group chat leaks from Dogpack were edited and left out dates of messages, she didn’t go on that livestream to call Nick a Mrbeast employee and say Nicks daddy is keemstar? she didn’t sperg out when being exposed? sounds and looks like she definitely knew Dogpack and herself misconstrued the group chat messages leaving out dates and editing messages


I worked for Soggy Cereal ✔, He's a fraud.

I watched Soggy Cereal’s video, He’s been paid off.


Not defending dog pack or Mr beast but the Delaware thing is confusing why where they hiding his face what of Jake the Viking why did target call him Delaware there too many situations that Is confusing

They only hid his face in one video. Every other one shows his face

It's not hiding his face. He was just wearing a mask. I have watched a lot of video of Mr.Beast from years ago. Delaware was fine without the mask Infront of the camera

@ no I did Delaware was from target but there are too many holes

@ oh so dog pack purposely left that out

Delaware wore a mask in that video and one video only, he appeared in other MrBeast videos outside of the one he wore a mask in and cam be seen without one, idk exactly why he wore one in that vid tho.


Yoooo this video is what I’ve been waiting for!! Thanks man ❤Awesome video.


If you think I am going to spend 1 hour 27 minutes and 43 seconds watching this video, you are right


I thought all the allegations were way too much but i didn't have any proof against it. Thanks Soggy Cereal


Bro what the fuck. Dog pack is literally more narcissistic than what he painted Jimmy to be wtffff


I doubt you will even read this but, thank you. I'm embarrassed I was mostly tricked by Dogpack.

yeah we all were. <br>was with dogpack up untill his "third video" then I just grew more and more suspicious of him.

yeah we all were.
was with dogpack up untill his "third video" then I just grew more and more suspicious of him.

most definitely the majority of the comments saying this video is "baseless" or just "its a bunch of allegations to disprove the allegations" either didn't watch the video due to dog packs brainwashing or are cherry picking claims. <br>And don't consider this comment glaze like I agree with soggy but we can all admit he could have gotten a thing or two wrong. Its just more wrong to disprove an entire video based on one claim

most definitely the majority of the comments saying this video is "baseless" or just "its a bunch of allegations to disprove the allegations" either didn't watch the video due to dog packs brainwashing or are cherry picking claims.
And don't consider this comment glaze like I agree with soggy but we can all admit he could have gotten a thing or two wrong. Its just more wrong to disprove an entire video based on one claim


This video only gets 300k views while dogpack's "exposing" video gets 10M+ views... Shows how much people want to see the biggest youtuber on the planet to fall off. "I knew it this guy was bad all along! His smiles are so fake" -🤓


It's weird why Mr. Beast hasn't responded to these allegations when you, one guy, were able to disprove most of the allegations. It would be even easier because Mr. Beast has the receipts.

Soggy Cereal was paid by MrBeast a large amount of money to make this video

@@bloxstarluke You remind me of dogpack, no source whatsoever 😭😭😭

@@bloxstarluke And your evidence for that incredibly bold claim is?

@bloxstarluke Source: trust me bro

Yet when DogPack tried pressuring Soggy into making a video against MrBeast, nobody called out DogPack for it. You Dogboy glazers gotta stop being so disingenuous like wtf.

Well, I know something that is definitely factual, it’s that Soggy Cereal makes dogsh1t videos that nobody genuinely likes. It’s just so obvious that Soggy Cereal is in the wrong here. Also, reply to me if you’re homophobic, racist, ableist, transphobic, and xenophobic

@@AmazingMarioPlushFilms Love how you liked your own comment, dumb@ss piece of sh.i.t

Bro these weirdos keep talking to me like I said something crazy. Do something with ur life instead of hating on a 13 yo like me

@@bloxstarluke I jus wanna know where you heard this from dawg


Finally, a Youtuber exposing Dogpack404 while not meatriding MrBeast!


MrBeast: doesn’t make a video defending himself
Soggy Cereal: “Fine, I’ll do it myself”

MrBeast: *doesn’t make a video defending himself*
Soggy Cereal: “Fine, I’ll do it myself”

He said he's not defending Mrbeast. Both DogPack and Beast are shitty people.


Bouta finish the vid what im confused by is that they discredited the “war crimes” statement because “it was originally said as a joke” but they didn’t prove the war crimes didn’t happen ie lights being kept on 24 hours a day long term sleep deprivation or even mention Mr beast making jake weddle do a treadmill marathon for a minute long insert into the challenge vid which left his body in shambles I could have watched wrong but to me it just seems like the excuse was “lmao bro coulda left he allowed it to happen to himself” which is a sh*tty take<br>EDIT: stop splitting hairs about the term war crime the horrible things still occurred what its referenced as is completely irrelevant the horrible things that happened were not properly addressed or falsified

Bouta finish the vid what im confused by is that they discredited the “war crimes” statement because “it was originally said as a joke” but they didn’t prove the war crimes didn’t happen ie lights being kept on 24 hours a day long term sleep deprivation or even mention Mr beast making jake weddle do a treadmill marathon for a minute long insert into the challenge vid which left his body in shambles I could have watched wrong but to me it just seems like the excuse was “lmao bro coulda left he allowed it to happen to himself” which is a sh*tty take
EDIT: stop splitting hairs about the term war crime the horrible things still occurred what its referenced as is completely irrelevant the horrible things that happened were not properly addressed or falsified

Exactly, People here will be like "oh no im not gonna believe what dogpack says blindly" and then believe what this dude says blindly, they just need to see the comments and if they are suporting the video they will also suport him, just following what the crowd says

@@Literallyryangosling777 Comments where most of them are shadow-🍌-ned, like in Beast videos. Nobody remembers the full PR damage control where they actively removed ANY negative or critical comment?

At the end of the day, the beast licker can keep defending their idol and enjoying him, I just know I used to believe him and will never watch his videos knowing they're staged. If millions of kids keep watching him, bad for them, they will eventually grow up or Beast will make an oopsie (letting karma do its job)

I mean if you want to split hairs it is technically not a warcrime because the contestant was not a prisoner of war. Still horrible tho

The video does not say nothing bad happened in that situation in fact he speaks to Dustin who validates Jake's experience. The fact that Weddle can leave is not used as an excuse it is used to show that calling it warcrime is false because you can't consentually agree to have a warcrime done to you.

@@Amlink So many replies here have been hidden or is it just mine? The more I try to get silenced, the more my opinion gets reinforced. Either Y-T or this channel are not proving I'm lying, they're proving they fear what I may say


you were 100% hired by mr. beast. yes you criticized him too, but only accepted the minor things so as the make him look just oblivious. when he is a big problem and youre just here for a paycheck.

@@InfraredFox5219ironic considering mr beasts fanbase

"uh... yeah I agreed with dogpack first and just because he criticized his reasons (with no one criticizing soggy yet) I hate this guy. also I dont watch mrbeast lol"


sure, sure... hopefully Beast paid you well for this jokefest

Maybe watch the video he literally doesn’t like both of them

Soggy provided receipts and neither he nor I like Mr. Beast all that much but the truth is the truth. You can dislike someone without slandering them it is common sense

How much money bitchpacked paid yu lil bro 😭😭😭😭😭

@@Matthias_Livessomeone at Mr. Beast paid for his flight. Why can’t you guys just admit you jumped the gun and got taken for a ride by a billionaire? It’s surely not the first time.

@@Lacewise it's funny, right:) the guy who sells star dust is not capable of paying some YT to do interviews with his employees to fix his picture. He has one the best team of people around him + unlimited funds. People are just blind.


this is insane amount of credible journalism. i hope more people see this. until then i'm subscribed for the future.


So the worst thing mr beast done is illegal lottery and crypto insider trading or something.

Id say the lack of paying the eye doctor charity until AFTER it became a large controversy is the worst. It's not evil though, just a sign that they're criminally irresponsible

@@adamusprime403that one was cleared up by the person. Mr beast was using a 3rd party to help with the surgeries and ig he got the dates mixed up

Think it's just what happened during the behind the scene of Beast game but I know it wasn't all of Jimmy's control, he hired many people to make it happen but he still should of focused on Safety.

He’s also being sued for unsafe practises on Amazon show.


This is literally trying to move between serious allegations finding things to slam the messenger for things that have nothing to do with them. Painting a kid who collected things available mostly in the public records that are unjust and scummy as the bad guy, and the billion dollars gambling, junk-food empire for children as the good, innocent guy. Here are some things that MrBeast needs to worry about instead of DogPack:

- An ex employee whom, years ago, mentioned he would often cuss and scream at him.

- His employee faking his signature for tshirts.
- Inviting a Youtuber to eventually win $500,000 in a competition for which he has pocketed millions by selling products to people who also wanted a chance to participate.
- Promoting gambling, unhealthy foods as good and "healthy" for children.
- Deception for things like giving his employee a car as a gift while he was roleplaying as one of the random participants.
- Constantly lying that his video are "real" and that he puts all his profits back into his videos.

- Gifting random gifts sent out by fans to other fans as lottery tickets for his gambling.
- Including massive destruciton and littering, throwing food around, plates full of food around, sitting on giant cakes to ruin them, creating a ton of videos promoting waste and destruction.

- Faking parts of his philanthropy videos.

Points like "Talking about this hurts the donations" and "There are people dying of wars so you shouldn't mention what happened to you" are extremely narcissistic, manipulative remarks. If we go by them, Jeffrey Epstein should have never been prosecuted, Bill Gates should have never been investigated because they were into donations too.


DogPack404 is a fraud and deceptive disgruntled employee! Cool!


I appreciate every part of this video EXCEPT the part on Jake Weddle. (The one concession I'll give is the AI recording video, that was unethical and bad practice.) Jake was very explicit when saying that because he was really poor it felt like a hostage situation - he's emotionally bound to stay even though he could technically "just leave" because the money he'd be leaving behind is life-changing. I don't think it's incorrect to compare that to the dynamics of SA. Abusive power dynamics keep people in very traumatising situations despite the option of "just say no" or "just leave" being on the table. I felt like you completely missed the point in that section, but the rest of the video was well done.

Yeah, that’s literally what Squid Game was about. Yeah, they could just leave, but it was still wrong to take advantage of them and let them die

@@officialmonarchmusic man vs man deathmatch is a lot different than man vs self. And now should mrbeast only do challenges with financially secure individuals? to avoid accidently having a poor person be emotionally bound to stay.

@@avalopeIt’s one thing to only do challenges with financially secure individuals. It’s another to make the contents of the challenge something extremely damaging to the health of the competitors. I’m not saying Squid Game is literally the same thing as Weddle’s confinement, but my point is, where do we draw the line? I do at long term health risks or death risks, which were definitely present in the solitary challenge. I also do just generally think this type of game show is exploitative and people should generally not do it

@@officialmonarchmusic do you think shows like alone where people live by themselves for at times months is exploitative? Where there are plenty more dangers. Its no different then real life jobs where people put themselves on the line for money.  Military, first responders, pilots,logging workers, etc.

He only had $50k in student debt. He could have left after just 5 days but insisted on staying. He ended up making over $100k doing no work, blew it all on flights to comedy shows and weed (he says as much himself in his first video), and now still needs handouts from Jimmy to pay off his debt. Dude is pathetic.

Jake Weddle got paid $10k a day for the challenge despite failing, praised Mr Beast after it then changed his tune when people turned on Mr Beast (AND GOT PAID AGAIN)

Don’t feel bad for the guy

This comment is so insane lmao, you are comparing an optional challenge to abusers?

Jake is an adult. There is no way for him to guarantee getting that money, this was after all a contest. Saying he was "emotionally bound" is just him being immature and naive. Do you say the same for people who are addicted to the lottery and spend all their money on that for life changing money? No, you call them stupid.

And then you compare this shit to abuse like just fuck off. Abuse has no upsides, you gain nothing from it besides pain and sadness. Comparing that to a challenge to get life changing money, where you can literally leave at any time, with paramedics and safety on standby is just so fucking stupid.

@@CommentCop You see the warcrime bit was just an elaborate Jake Weddle comedy routine. When he compared himself to rape victims, the joke was on you!


This entire comment section summed up:

20% morepegasus videos incoming

80% ”UGHHH STUPID MRBEAST GLAZER THIS VIDEO IS TRASH STOP DEFENDING MRBEAST EVERYTHING YOU SAY IS WRONG, WRONG WRONG!!!!!😡😡😡😡”

nah its
10% morepegasus videos incoming
50% I KNEW THAT DOGPACK404 WAS A SCUMBAG
40% Yeah this is absolutely paid by beast and soggy is just a pathetic sellout


Same thing for the 100 boys v girls accusation. If the employees in the video were there to fill in people who tested positive for COVID. If you claimed they were random people but then they weren’t random because some people had covid then that DOEN’T mean that the video wasn’t fake it just means that there was a good reason to fake the video. Which does NOT mean that it wasn’t fake


this might be mr beast's response lol, dogpack said a lot of bull, but this soggy guy is avoiding criticizing mr beast when he's obviously not a saint either, it's framed as an unbiased video but it's quite one sided. he had a lot of insider info and contacts (like the interviews), and avoided obvious problems with the beast channel, also tried to make dogpack look like a lunatic , some real KGB stuff

Nice conspiracy theory that he is an agent of Mr. Beast lmao... Where do random allegations like that get us? Certainly not conducive to true and honest thought and discussion...

The purpose of his video is to discredit Dogpack for his lies, he doesn't need to "criticize mr beast" when that would distract from the topic.

He deadass criticized mr beast in the video multiple times 😭

@@Walrus101  He straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

@@shadowed69you mean he is straight up giving us the true information of what actually happened?

@@shadowed69cornball copy pasting the comment everywhere

@@shadowed69 This is 100% where Occam's Razor needs to be pulled out.

WHY would he knowingly hire a RSO? That would bring huge controversy to him and loss of income and create problems. WHY would he? The guy is just so desirable to the brand that he is willing to do it? I'm sure that can't be the case.

Do you have any explanation for why he would knowingly do that? You do have any proof it was known before hiring?

And are you defending Dogpack, or just contesting this one thing? You think Soggy--according to you--rewriting one detail makes this illegitimate and Dogpack honest? Or what's up?

@@shadowed69 This is 100% where Occam's Razor needs to be pulled out.

WHY would he knowingly hire a RSO? That would bring huge controversy to him and loss of income and create problems. WHY would he? The guy is just so desirable to the brand that he is willing to do it? I'm sure that can't be the case.

Do you have any explanation for why he would knowingly do that? You do have any *proof* it was known before hiring?

And are you defending Dogpack, or just contesting this one thing? You think Soggy--according to you--rewriting one detail makes this illegitimate and Dogpack honest? Or what's up?

@@Walrus101
the topic is "the truth about mrbeast & dogpack404", not "disproving everything dogpack said"

all of his claims are twisted or nitpicked in one way or another. he’s trying to deliberately disprove them instead of looking at them from an unbiased perspective. he’s already made up his mind, creating his own counter-accusations, and is just trying to prove those instead of being fully transparent. the whole thing feels pretty suspicious to me.

take jake weddle’s suffering, for instance. he had “was it a war crime” or something along those lines on the board and then claimed that the “war crime” part was just a joke. but technically, even if it was said as a joke, that doesn’t mean it couldn’t still be true. does that make jake’s suffering any less real?

then there’s soggy’s response to the “mack” situation: “mack lived at a fellow editor’s house. i have the documents, but i can’t show you—trust me.” that’s pretty much all he says to dismiss the entire mack story.

beast might’ve gotten rid of delaware, but he definitely kept lacoya in the company even after knowing about his actions or criminal cases.

kris tyson: there are hundreds of be real discord messages proving that mrbeast was aware of tyson’s servers and behavior.

then there’s the “child psychology” issue. it’s clearly still a harmful practice, even if dogpack partook in it/ the employees insists it’s “for all ages.” “all ages” obviously includes children—and probably more than “just includes” in a pretty deliberate way.

many beast videos use CGI or are doctored for dramatic effect. is that a problem? that’s up to you as the viewer. but soggy didn’t actually disprove dogpack’s claims; he just nitpicked a few cases where CGI represented the actual thing, or where footage was slightly doctored instead of outright fake.

he did criticize mrbeast but only slightly. the whole thing seems like a constant attack and denigration of dogpacks  character, and his dishonest and exaggerated accusations about mr beast based on barely any evidence.       meanwhile soggy’s counter-accusations mostly rely on a couple of message testimonies and interviews from (weirdly enough) current mrbeast employees. whilst  up to this date there has been absolutely no official statement or response issued by the Beast team/ company/ the man himself till now  (them being real careful with their response).So it feels like the employees have all been PR-trained on exactly what to say (or not say). mrbeast isn’t some saint, either.

dogpack was dishonest, but so was this soggy guy! trust no one!

@@Walrus101 No, I think many things in this video are biased and manipulative. I can't copy paste a giant message like that explaining everything without getting banned. I made my own comment with more explanations if you can find it.
attempted summary:
-aggressive, nitpicky defamation of dogpack. fills the board with "all of dogpack's claims" (that is not anywhere near all of them, and many claims are only cherry-picked portions that he can X out so it looks like he disproved everything form dogpack by the end
-way to much focus on small points that he frames as terrible awful things (like yeah, obviously it wasn't literally a warcrime. what happened to Jake was still fucked up??)
-convenient recording of Dogpack's termination that's only showing up now for some reason. almost as if it didnt exist before and this is AI.
-convenient interviews of current Mr. Beast employees that support their narrative despite no other journalist getting the chance to do that up until this point.
-plenty more but i have a life and cannot keep explaining to people why they need to question the weird things that manipulative people like this guy do instead of blindly believing him

As far as Occam's razor, it's because he believed the guy's story. And it's certainly possible that Delaware truly didn't commit the crime and just took a plea deal.
However, subjecting your child audience to that risk is a WHOLLY irresponsible and disgusting thing to do, no matter how good his story sounded. Mr. Beast "was young and dumb" except his more mature mother also approved it. Then he hid is face in a vid years later under a mask, knowing exactly how much of a problem it could be that he had Delaware in that video.

@@ratondolce I don't even need to read the rest of your message to know you're heavily biased (but I will) when you say that literally ALL of his his points are twisted. That absolutely is not true at all. You seem to want it to be that way.

It doesn't matter what the title is, the theme and intent of the video is clear from the content. He isn't weighing both or doing arguments on both, he is countering Dogpack points while saying some things from Mr. Beast are off in the process.

I don't see any real evidence that Soggy is being dishonest or that his arguments are affected heavily by bias. I'm sure he has a bias, that is likely from his countering all but 1 of Dogpack's points (1 that people agree on regardless of Dogpack) but most of what he says is legitimate and provable/sound arguments. You are saying he is dishonest, when I feel like you should be saying you don't think his argument is 100% provable.

I don't even really understand the "warcrimes" issue and seems silly. For CGI, he disproved claims of CGI and it CGI manipulating things; the intent was never to say there is no CGI, right? The address makes sense to not give info on, but of course you can't take him saying he has the info as absolute fact. Don't think he said anything against Mr. Beast and child psychology?

@@shadowed69 I'm sure he skewed the video in his favor with the "claims board" yes, that was clear to me. When you put up 20+ things and say all of them  are false (except one that doesn't even really have to do with Dogpack at this point), it's clear there are details being left out which were not able to be disproven, or some were picked apart/changed a bit to be more easily called wrong.
I think AI accusation is a bit ridiculous without any evidence. He has shown he has these sources. Dogpack could easily disprove it or argue against it at least.
For "Delaware," he knew the guy had a history but Delaware made an explanation? I didn't know about that, but if so, he probably simply believed it. Anyone could and he was very young too. I really don't understand any argument being made that he would knowingly hire a RSO. Whether Mr. Beast is an angel or a money hungry conman, he would never in 1000 years want to do that. It would only cause him risk for no reasonable benefit accounting.

I never see anyone online create a 100% bulletproof argument. Everyone is fueled by bias and can skew things because of that. So yes, this video isn't perfect, and people shouldn't blindly listen to everything, but it's a good expose on Dogpack, who everyone blindly believed when it was obvious he was manipulating, because people wanted to believe him. I was one of the ONLY people calling out his manipulation in his original video/s while everyone blindly took what they were fed. This video is important, and certainly seems more right than wrong.

@@Walrus101 idk what points you're trying to make here, but the guy you're replying to said it better than I did so I'm also gonna second that.<br>But to be clear, Dogpack is a bad journalist. Some criticism of how he's handled this situation is deserved. This guy (Soggy) is not trying to constructively criticize Dogpack, he is trying to destroy his character and disassemble every single accusation he made that he can reasonably get away with. He only criticized Mr. Beast on the easy, soft things that would be stupid to try to disprove, because then everyone would know he's just been paid by Beast to make this video.

@@Walrus101 idk what points you're trying to make here, but the guy you're replying to said it better than I did so I'm also gonna second that.
But to be clear, Dogpack is a bad journalist. Some criticism of how he's handled this situation is deserved. This guy (Soggy) is not trying to constructively criticize Dogpack, he is trying to destroy his character and disassemble every single accusation he made that he can reasonably get away with. He only criticized Mr. Beast on the easy, soft things that would be stupid to try to disprove, because then everyone would know he's just been paid by Beast to make this video.

@shadowed69  I wrote a reply to you, you may not have noticed because you were writing this message at the same time.

I do want to point out something that you should be careful of in yourself, is that you are taking the approach of being very objective and opposing anything that isn't 100% on board or provable, but you have made multiple conspiracy theories with no actual evidence. You should be careful to stick to logic in your own mind, not claim AI conversations and him being literally paid off by Mr. Beast when there is 0 evidence for that. And when you are making your argument to someone else, your emphasis on truth and logic will be undermined by your own departures from fair analysis.

@@Walrus101 I appreciate it. If this wasn't a youtube comment section, and instead my own YT video I made in response, I would be much more objective with my responses. I'm throwing out these ideas because too many people are blindly believing this guy, and I'm scared of what that means for our society's ability to recognize and fight back corruption. Mr. Beast has had enough provable claims at this point that he should not be forgiven, should not be idolized, and should not have a platform. I want to make sure people don't forget that. I truly believe that he commandeered this video to save his reputation. If that's true, and it's working the way that it is, we are all in a lot of trouble as a whole. Jake Weddle already received an incredibly convincing AI generated video of Mr. Beast propaganda. He made a video on it. A normal person would not be able to tell that it was fake unless the idea was proposed to them. That is why I am making that claim about this video. It doesn't make any sense why we are just hearing this recording now, when it is most convenient. This technology exists, unfortunately, and the motivation to abuse it is there. I wish I could believe that I am just being conspiratorial.

@@Walrus101  yeah you are correct about out my phrasing,  most of his evidence is not  twisted, but as shadowed69 user has put it, and what i also meant to say was  that he skewed the whole board in his favor, the premise of ALL(or most) the claims are skewed and nitpicked, he framed most counter-arguments in his/beasts favor even when some of dogpacks accusations weren't entirely false/ or were more a question of morality. otherwise he was being either overly vague or  focusing on irrelevant aspects to disprove dogpack whislt ignoring the wrongdoings of mrbeast. if this is a clarification video, shouldn't it go both ways and be UNBIASED?

 (eg. mack situation-no proof, kris tyson situation-he focused on dogpacks false accusations, warcrime situation-"it was initially a joke", employee interview-they claim that they dont use predatory tactics)-
-do any of these disprove nepotism, kris tyson being a weirdo and beast knowing,  jake weddle being emotionally scarred whilst partaking from pressure to gain  fame/monetary reasons, should we take the employees word about them not using unethical engagement tactics cuz they said "no" ? the answer is NO,

soggy disprove some or most of dogpacks falsified and nitpicked evidence, but ignores the other side of the coin which is Mr Beast

 that is dishonest and one sided to me! mr beast is clearly not a good person either.

@shadowed69  It does fully come down to conspiracy caused by bias though, that's important to realize even while you are committed to believing it. There is no evidence for that, yet you see it as possible and that leads you to thinking of it as more likely than not. It is inherently not objective and is largely illogical, when there is no evidence backing it, only a lack of things disproving it.

I find it very unlikely he was bribed by Mr. Beast, he has had his own channel making videos for a long time now, and this is not the first time he is being recognized; he was already reasonably "popular" (for a small YouTuber). Sabotaging all that to take a bribe is not impossible, but certainly not the most likely thing for someone to do. And for AI, well there's really no backing to that. It's good to be cautious of things, but being too "cautious" leads often to departures from reality and clinging to conspiracy. Anything that happens can now be attributed to AI (not really usually, but people think that way and soon will be reality), or someone being paid off, so it's an easy concept to jump to, and people usually stick to those beliefs and other such things without needing evidence. Real slippery slope. I find it best to just focus on what we can see, interpret through facts and real logic, and leave the speculation to not be focused on. We can realize there are other possibilities, but to fixate on the unknown and unproven over what is provable is dangerous. Logic and truth, that's what matters. Not a lot to benefit from when you go beyond that.

@ratondolce  I definitely agree with the "facts board," it was clearly skewed in my eyes when all but 1 (that doesn't even really have to do with dogpack) are marked as false. That is definitely rigging it to support his side better. While it doesn't prove lies, it does show a non-objective and manipulative presentation of information. There is obviously bias, with this and other aspects. Everyone is biased, it's usually truly difficult to be unbiased in an approach, but he certainly could have made it much more fair and objective, yes.

I still disagree with the notion that this is some 50/50 dogpack and Mr beast video. It really is a dogpack video in my eyes, I think that is the full intent. He approaches dogpack's claims and talks about Mr beast in countering dogpack. It is not a video that focuses on who Mr. Beast is as it's own topic, just a sub topic of talking about Dogpack.

@shadowed69  (cens0ring bc deleted)
It does fully come down to c0nspiracy caused by bias though, that's important to realize even while you are committed to believing it. There is no evidence for that, yet you see it as possible and that leads you to thinking of it as more likely than not. It is inherently not objective and is largely illogical, when there is no evidence backing it, only a lack of things disproving it.

I find it very unlikely he was bribed by Mr. Beast, he has had his own channel making videos for a long time now, and this is not the first time he is being recognized; he was already reasonably "popular" (for a small YouTuber). Sabotaging all that to take a bribe is not impossible, but certainly not the most likely thing for someone to do. And for AI, well there's really no backing to that. It's good to be cautious of things, but being too "cautious" leads often to departures from reality and clinging to c0nspiracy. Anything that happens can now be attributed to AI (not really usually, but people think that way and soon will be reality), or someone being paid off, so it's an easy concept to jump to, and people usually stick to those beliefs and other such things without needing evidence. Real slippery slope. I find it best to just focus on what we can see, interpret through facts and real logic, and leave the speculation to not be focused on. We can realize there are other possibilities, but to fixate on the unknown and unproven over what is provable is dangerous. Logic and truth, that's what matters. Not a lot to benefit from when you go beyond that.

(Cens0ring bc del3ted)
 It does fully come down to c0nspiracy caused by b1as though, that's important to realize even while you are committed to believing it. There is no evidence for that, yet you see it as possible and that leads you to thinking of it as more likely than not. It is inherently not objective and is largely ill0gical, when there is no evidence backing it, only a lack of things disproving it.

I find it very unlikely he was br1bed by Mr. Beast, he has had his own channel making videos for a long time now, and this is not the first time he is being recognized; he was already reasonably "popular" (for a small YouTuber). Sab0taging all that to take a bribe is not impossible, but certainly not the most likely thing for someone to do. And for AI, well there's really no backing to that. It's good to be cautious of things, but being too "cautious" leads often to departures from reality and clinging to c0nspiracy. Anything that happens can now be attributed to AI (not really usually, but people think that way and soon will be reality), or someone being paid off, so it's an easy concept to jump to, and people usually stick to those beliefs and other such things without needing evidence. Real slippery slope. I find it best to just focus on what we can see, interpret through facts and real logic, and leave the speculation to not be focused on. We can realize there are other possibilities, but to fixate on the unknown and unproven over what is provable is danger0us. Logic and truth, that's what matters. Not a lot to benefit from when you go beyond that.

@shadowed69  (Cens0ring to a huge degree bc I'm not allowed to post)
 It does fully c0me d0wn to c0nspiracy caused by b1as though, that's important to realize even while you are c0mmitted to believing it. There is no ev1dence for that, yet you see it as possible and that leads you to thinking of it as more likely than not. It is inherently not 0bjective and is largely ill0gical, when there is no ev1dence backing it, only a l*ck of things dispr0ving it.

I find it very unlikely he was br1bed by Mr. Be*st, he has had his own chann3l making videos for a l0ng time now, and this is not the first time he is being recognized; he was already reasonably "popular" (for a small Y0uTuber). Sab0taging all that to take a br1be is not impossible, but certainly not the most likely thing for someone to do. And for AI, well there's really no back1ng to that. It's good to be cautious of things, but being too "cautious" leads often to dep@rtures from reality and cl1nging to c0nspiracy. Anything that happens can now be attributed to AI (not really usually, but people think that way and soon will be reality), or someone being p*id off, so it's an easy concept to jump to, and people usually st1ck to those bel1efs and other such things without needing ev1dence. Real sl1ppery slope. I find it best to just focus on what we can see, interpret through facts and real logic, and leave the specul@tion to not be focused on. We can realize there are other possibilities, but to f1xate on the unknown and unpr0ven over what is pr0vable is danger0us. Logic and truth, that's what matters. Not a lot to benefit from when you go beyond that.
(If you got this far, thank you for reading through that mess)

@shadowed69  YouTube is literally forbidding me from posting my response. I censored half the words, when there already wasn't a singe remotely offensive word. I'm so awfully sick of attempting to communicate with people on this terrible platform.

In short, I think it's best for us all to focus on what we can truly interpret and prove, leave speculation in the background. Not a lot of benefit comes from focusing on the unproven and unproveable, generally!


Dogpacks whole arguement relies on the fact that no one does their own research and it’s kinda sad that basically no one did tell now

Soggy is straight up is re-writing the narrative about Mr. Beast knowingly hiring a RSO (Delaware) which was confirmed by his son in law, Jake the Viking, months ago.

@@shadowed69he literally said mrbeast should take responsibility for the mistake he made and even cut the music and answered with a clear "YES"🤦🏾♂ bru yall are actually so baffling to listen to


its funny how this genuine and factual video gets less views because he isnt clickbaiting and spreading interesting lies like dogpack is<br>love the video man

its funny how this genuine and factual video gets less views because he isnt clickbaiting and spreading interesting lies like dogpack is
love the video man

Maybe it’s only been out for a few hours and dog pack isn’t even close to mrbeast popularity

@@zoomedcheese Maybe people are still frustrated about Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul that's why people aren't interesting in another MrBeast drama right now

it took a while for dogpacks video to take off too

It'll catch on eventually cuz of the drama channels


There can still be a part 2 of Mr Beast content cop lol. Just cuz mr beast wasnt actively evilmaxxing, doesnt mean mr beast hasnt done evil stuff.


How you're downplaying the Jake Weddle stuff is bad. So what if the warcrimes comment is a joke? It was still abuse and severe mistreatement! Makes me not want to watch the rest of this, Weddle is still a victim and it's gross how much you're trying to downplay that.

He a grown ahh man leave the challenge 💀

@@godartz3064 That's like saying "Just leave the abusive relationship bro" or "Just leave the cult bro", braindead take.

@ not really it’s not the same your in a challenge where u are getting paid the point of a challenge is to be challenging if you can’t handle it simply leave challenge excuse me if I don’t feel sympathy for someone who is getting paid thousands of dollars for a challenge he can literally leave any time vs someone in a relationship with someone who they believe have their best interests in heart taking advantage of them it’s not the same thing don’t try to compare them to make your argument sound better

@@godartz3064  I'm using it as a comparison to show how there are coersive elements around that so called "free choice" that influence your decisions. And to ignore the fact that Jake was an employee, was struggling financially and everyone around him in the company egged him on is such a scummy reductive take.<br>Like if you've worked any job ever, you know exactly the feeling Jake expressed in his interview. And all the clowns saying "just leave bro" are clearly either children who have never worked a day in their life or extremely priviledged adults who don't now what it's like to have crippling expenses & actually NEED money & a job to survive.

@@godartz3064  I'm using it as a comparison to show how there are coersive elements around that so called "free choice" that influence your decisions. And to ignore the fact that Jake was an employee, was struggling financially and everyone around him in the company egged him on is such a scummy reductive take.
Like if you've worked any job ever, you know exactly the feeling Jake expressed in his interview. And all the clowns saying "just leave bro" are clearly either children who have never worked a day in their life or extremely priviledged adults who don't now what it's like to have crippling expenses & actually NEED money & a job to survive.

@@m0nkeywrenchcomparing himself to a victim of a war crime is crazy tho

He is not a victim lmfao he consensually agreed to participate in a challenge and was paid 10k a day to do so, and was free to quit or stop at any time. Also, comparing a mr beast challenge to an abusive relationship is incredibly bad faith, these things are not even remotely comparable. Totally distorting the scenario here.

@@m0nkeywrenchcomparing an intentionally tough challenge for good cash to toxic relationship is a real bad faith argument. The guy was also still gonna collect the money he accumulated even if he left, and was even offered money after the challenge

that's bcus this is a propaganda piece with an obvious bias, it is good enough for his kid viewers

Said it once and I'll say it again. What Beast did was no different than what Reality TV shows such as Survivor, Fear Factor, Dog Eat Dog, and Jackass have done. You suffer for money. If you're gonna cancel Beast, go ahead and cancel those Reality TV shows. Nobody has complained about them for decades. It's only when Beast does it that everyone gets up in arms.

Not everyone is perfect and knows all the right ways of addressing or expression, or knows all the right perspectives over the unknown. The point of this video is Dogpack404's massive slander, and it's now clear he's lying in most of the case.

Because he's doing this video for MrBeast while lying about being impartial. If you can't see that this video is a thinly veiled MrBeast meatride glazefest, then you're blind. All of the top comments are pro MrBeast and pro-this vid. You've got to scroll a bit before the impartiality appears. I'm not saying that DogPack was 100% accurate, but it was much more accurate than this video is making it look. This is video is damage control and an attack from MrBeast and his fans are lapping it up without admitting it.

@@intothevoid9831 Stop clutching your pearls at my mention of abusive relationships, I wasn't implying it was on the same level of severity as them, I was using it as a comparison to show how outside influences and pressures can distort that "free choice" into a coersive and manipulative one.

@@CloudDirected  Except those shows (at least the non-scummy ones) inform their contestants in a  non biased manner of the severity and possible health implications of the challenges, they have medical teams on standby in case of an injury, they have proper contracts, and are generally WAY more professional than MrBeast.
Like seriously, say the producers of Survivor or whatever were constantly pressuring the contestants like "Ohh man if you quit now that's all this money wasted on the TV show!" That would rightfully be called out as scummy, and I'd call out any reality show that did that. (And I absolutely despise the TV shows that have done this kinda shit)
And it's clear in the interview that the people around Weddle were constantly downplaying the severity of the challenge, selling it to him as a "fun vacation with an ice cream machine and stuff!". Again, imagine if a legit TV show did this. It would rightfully be a scandal.
I agree that these sorts of extreme challenges are ok to do for entertainement, but it needs to be WAY more professional than how it was handled with Weddle.

@@gernil6216  Yeah I agree that Dogpack needs to be held to a higher standard and investigated for his false accusations, but this video goes way too far the other direction where he downplays alot of the legit critisisms aswell. I'm tired of Youtubers having 0 nuance in their takes, you know?

@@AaronSmith-rm9kl  Agreed that is kinda over the top, but I'm getting tired of Weddle being held to the standard of "perfect victim", especially considering when he says that in the interview you can clearly see he's reliving some trauma while talking about it, like the nervous laughs and jokes & being on the verge of tears, so it's understandable that he wouldn't be 100% clear with his words.

@ that’s true they probably should have done a mental stability test to check if he was actually up for the challenge

@@AaronSmith-rm9kl I'd argue that most people would break under those circumstances, but yeah agreed, having a medical team and some sort of psychology professional would have been the bare minimum for such an extreme challenge.

@@m0nkeywrench  Again, not everyone is perfect, including their takes on situation. Even I don't understand what the word "nuance" is and what is considered nuanced. And I don't also understand what criticisms you are referring to, dojn't understand how actual 'downplay' in your definition was visually shown, as you saw what downplay was acted through, but other people me or even soggy cereal wouldn't even see the downplay. How can this be indicative and naturally be clearly concerning for other people to know (which they have different perspective) from what you're currently understanding? and do they really matter to these perhaps small instances? Do some of the criticisms you saw could affect the victims if downplayed? Not so easy, even Soggy cereal himself completely believed the 'concerning' statement of Camnugget at 32:32 that he 'watching minors b*tthole' when he was actually reporting the mods to a minor doing that in a discord, and soggy in twitter dumbly thought his phrasing in actuality and said "i think you'd notify a mod that a minor is showing explicit bodyparts on cam in a more... serious manner". Thankfully, he did remove that misinformation and covering cam's false implication expressed in the video which is which you can't see such statement i provide in the timestamp. No one is perfect to be ashamed of having such dismissing belief or action or thought or anything.

@@m0nkeywrench You might need to refresh and reread my comment again after a bunch of editing for improved grammatical context

@@gernil6216  I get where you're coming from, when I say he has 0 nuance in his take I'm talking about the Weddle situation specifically, alot of the video does a good job and yeah props to Soggy for not being one of those shitty drama-bait channels that come out with the most sensationalist stuff without backing it up.<br>It just rubbed me the wrong way when he dismissed the Weddle situation as just a dude volunteering for a challenge where he had a complete free choice to leave, because it doesn't take into account the peer pressure, the monetary pressure, the pressure of the work environement, the team around him downplaying the extreme nature of the challenge (this is stuff that was said in the interview by Jake, how he says people were saying 'oh it's just gonna be like a fun vacation' to get him to do it) and the clear lack of any safety precautions & lack of professional standards in a potentially very dangerous challenge.

@@gernil6216  I get where you're coming from, when I say he has 0 nuance in his take I'm talking about the Weddle situation specifically, alot of the video does a good job and yeah props to Soggy for not being one of those shitty drama-bait channels that come out with the most sensationalist stuff without backing it up.
It just rubbed me the wrong way when he dismissed the Weddle situation as just a dude volunteering for a challenge where he had a complete free choice to leave, because it doesn't take into account the peer pressure, the monetary pressure, the pressure of the work environement, the team around him downplaying the extreme nature of the challenge (this is stuff that was said in the interview by Jake, how he says people were saying 'oh it's just gonna be like a fun vacation' to get him to do it) and the clear lack of any safety precautions & lack of professional standards in a potentially very dangerous challenge.

@@m0nkeywrench hmm yeah an interesting situation, I just checked what challenge did he go through, but didn't know the whole situation beforehand, I don't spend much exploring on the allegations like these to worth my own time in my life. Unfortunately, this means Soggy didn't consider this part, but also is very hard to notice among all other allegations presented in the internet to disprove. But like also then, how can you trust such individual when he himself tells his side of the story while aiming to DEFAME Mrbeast with dawson?

I dugged through their replies and comment, like the comment Dogpack404 made on Jakeweddle's "i caught Jimmy in a secret recording" video, it made me disgusted what he and jake said. That apparently jake 'deserves' the $190k (which now we know he's a complete deceptive liar about mrbeast, considering this, what they said 'deserve' what intended for the opposite reason, money) He said "I think you should get the full $190k. Jimmy privately offering you money to "make things right" is a clear admission of guilt. I hope you get all the money you deserve though and then some more." and jake also pushes his support in confirming his 'guilt' which he said "I appreciate you dude. Yes, he admitted guilt. THATS the real thing we are all over looking here 😏". And you know what Jake did with the 50k money? Watch Lerix's video on Jake Weddle video over 1 minute, where the irony in what he uses that money was shown and spends for his personal gains rather than he claimed to spend it on 'his bills'. You should know now he doesn't care as much, knows the truth but the intention of defaming mrbeast and getting money, the stories he narrates can be exxagerated and fabricated like "he was sitting on a chair and turning around like an evil villian." or "deep blisters under my foot". Although considering the past challenges traumatic enough, consider tho Jimmy's team are likely less experienced to perceive the actual dangerous level of risk in this kind of specific challenge, despite the risk being clouded by the seemingly visually fine environment, his people can't know the inside perspective of jake undergoing this challenge. We people can't go in the past, informing past self the mistakes, the complete risks being fully unaware, etc. especially for other things jimmy has done like the first illegal lottery which almost no one in that time including the crew knew it was illegal. And you also know how Jake likes to get himself money? Well he has such reasons why he partook these challenges, the treadmill one, the solitary confinement, all for possibly the money, getting to the point where he doesn't i guess mentally embraces staying the longest time for more money, instead of being strategic with how to be sane or simply leave if it was too much. Could be that maybe his greediness made him so desperate with using a poor approach on how to stay long, up to the point where mental capacity was at its limit (while jimmy's team are inexperienced for running these challenges) finally gave up, seemingly jimmy and the crew didn't saw how traumatic it was for him with maybe an expression broken enough not to express emotion. I assumed maybe 11 days was too short for a mrbeast 100 day video and the second mrbeast contestant was qualified to succeed the challenge. Well, this proves overall his situation, some are not in actuality when there are these mentioned possibilities, to consider the idea what may have happened. I don't think it's his fault having to end up in a malicious position due to the nature of this world and nature of people, now jake unfortunately sucks as a scumbag.

Now if you read the entire thing, you could see some negligence upon reading them, that I may not see myself, which is an important point I want to emphasis

@@m0nkeywrench hmm yeah an interesting situation, I just checked what challenge did he go through, but didn't know the whole situation beforehand, I don't spend much exploring on the allegations like these to worth my own time in my life. Unfortunately, this means Soggy didn't consider this part, but also is very hard to notice among all other allegations presented in the internet to disprove. But like also then, how can you trust such individual when he himself tells his side of the story while aiming to DEFAME Mrbeast with dawson?

I dugged through their replies and comment, like the comment Dogpack404 made on Jakeweddle's "i caught Jimmy in a secret recording" video, it made me disgusted what he and jake said. That apparently jake 'deserves' the $190k (which now we know he's a complete deceptive liar about mrbeast, considering this, what they said 'deserve' what intended for the opposite reason, money) He said "I think you should get the full $190k. Jimmy privately offering you money to "make things right" is a clear admission of guilt. I hope you get *all the money you deserve though and then some more."* and jake also pushes his support in confirming his 'guilt' which he said "I appreciate you dude. Yes, he admitted guilt. THATS the real thing we are all over looking here 😏". And you know what Jake did with the 50k money? Watch Lerix's video on Jake Weddle video over 1 minute, where the irony in what he uses that money was shown and spends for his personal gains rather than he claimed to spend it on 'his bills'. You should know now he doesn't care as much, knows the truth but the intention of defaming mrbeast and getting money, the stories he narrates can be exxagerated and fabricated like "he was sitting on a chair and turning around like an evil villian." or "deep blisters under my foot". Although considering the past challenges traumatic enough, consider tho Jimmy's team are likely less experienced to perceive the actual dangerous level of risk in this kind of specific challenge, despite the risk being clouded by the seemingly visually fine environment, his people can't know the inside perspective of jake undergoing this challenge. We people can't go in the past, informing past self the mistakes, the complete risks being fully unaware, etc. especially for other things jimmy has done like the first illegal lottery which almost no one in that time including the crew knew it was illegal. And you also know how Jake likes to get himself money? Well he has such reasons why he partook these challenges, the treadmill one, the solitary confinement, all for possibly the money, getting to the point where he doesn't i guess mentally embraces staying the longest time for more money, instead of being strategic with how to be sane or simply leave if it was too much. Could be that maybe his greediness made him so desperate with using a poor approach on how to stay long, up to the point where mental capacity was at its limit (while jimmy's team are inexperienced for running these challenges) finally gave up, seemingly jimmy and the crew didn't saw how traumatic it was for him with maybe an expression broken enough not to express emotion. I assumed maybe 11 days was too short for a mrbeast 100 day video and the second mrbeast contestant was qualified to succeed the challenge. Well, this proves overall his situation, some are not in actuality when there are these mentioned possibilities, to consider the idea what may have happened. I don't think it's his fault having to end up in a malicious position due to the nature of this world and nature of people, now jake unfortunately sucks as a scumbag.

Now if you read the entire thing, you could see some negligence upon reading them, that I may not see myself, which is an important point I want to emphasis

@@m0nkeywrench .. don't tell me my message didn't get sent and didn't copy paste an extremely long comment

@@gernil6216  I read your longer message that starts with "Again, not everyone is perfect", I hope that was the message you intended to send, youtube comments are so annoying with stuff like that so I get you lol


What are changes we'll see this guy in a MrBeast video soon 🙄

Wouldn't be a surprise, he loves to treat his puppies well


im 100% anti mr beast, 99% is because hes rich and im poor. I like seeing the other side of things tho, thank you for this video

Edit: im an hour into the video now, i am still anti mr beast for the same reason...me being a poor...but my opinion on dogpack has changed for sure. again, thank you for this video. i always knew there was more to the story, and lots of things in his videos seemed fishy and i questioned it.

Well at least your honest about it. I like your moxxy


Cool and all, but the very first two things are literally just you straw manning the claims.

Sure, maybe Delaware wasn't a p3do, but you know who was? Ava Kris Tyson. You don't just buy from and promote someone who is famous for making "graphics" of l0lis. You don't just hang up that art in your living room and say, "Beautiful masterpiece!" And as for Mr. Beast, him being friends with someone like Tyson while also running a family friendly YouTube channel is completely contradictory.

Then as for the war crimes, you're missing the point that Weddle was still forced to do unspeakable things (such as running a marathon and being blinded by lights 24/7). Just because "It's not a war crime!" Doesn't make it right. Especially for someone like Mr. Beast, who is known for being an 'awesome stand up dude'.

The video starts with one of Mr.Beast's manager saying Dawson was ruining the company's reputation... Couldn't he find someone a little bit less biased?

Mr Beast removed Ava off the company after they found out. What else were they supposed to do?

Weddle was NOT forced. He could quit any time he wanted.

@@intothevoid9831 Mr Beast knew for a LONG time and only removed Ava once the cat was actually out of the bag and everyone knew. There's multiple points of evidence for this, but the most solid piece of evidence showing Mr Beast knew was the picture of the l0li literally hung up in Mr Beast's own living room.

And as for Weddle, you're right, he wasn't literally forced to do the things, but Weddle himself explains with how everything was going and how the situation was, he felt obligated to do those things. And he literally asked for the lights to be turned off, to which he was flat out denied approval to.


I agree with you that dogpack is definitely untrustworthy and has been spreading lies and allegations against Mr. Beast hoping one of them lands to discredit him.

However, I see that you then use the SAME TACTICS that dogpack did by spreading allegations against dogpack to discredit him.

Which is why I find you very hypocritical.

This is seen clearly with interviewing his coworker. She said that when working with dogpack he kept things "cordial and professional", but then accuses him of making her "uncomfortable". However, I notice that you cut out the clip of what she said afterwards, which I wonder why. She then says dogpack gave her "weird vibes", but doesn't elaborate further at all. This leads me to believe that she is purposely trying to make Dawson seem like a creep to discredit him. Perhaps being told by management to do this.

Also, it is clear to me that you are also on board with discrediting Dogpack. I say this bc you then asked her about "any weird stories about things Dogpack did" which the coworker then called about him saying some food is s***. First of all, why is this relevant to Dogpacks' accusations and the video? Secondly, why should us viewers care about what food Dogpack *allegedly, used profanity for? How does this contribute to the video, it is just irrelevant to the discussion? It seems like a very dirty attempt to make him look bad for something that has NOTHING to do with the video.

You accuse Dogpack of spreading malicious lies against Mr. Beast, when Lo and Behold, you then DO THE SAME THING by asking for rumors about Dogpack and showing it to millions of people.

Lastly, I want to say that while Dustin felt bad for Jake and what Jake went through definitely wasn't a war crime- IT WAS STILL UNETHICAL AND UNACCEPTABLE. And Dustin and Mr. Beast still have not taken responsibility for the abuse he went through. In fact, in this video Dustin BLAMED Jake for not being cut out for the challenge, instead of the unethical practices.

Like how on Earth can u say Jake wasn't the right person for the video when NO HUMAN BEING can run a marathon while being sleep deprived and starved due to bad caretaking? Dustin deflects all blame on Mr.Beast for the conditions Jake went through.

This video shows me that Dogpack cannot be trusted, but you can't be either.

youre onto nothing lil bro lol, the probably only and biggest fumble soggy did in the video you didnt catch because as soon as he realized his mistake he removed it from the video unlike DogPack that kept the false video up for like a month. The rest of the BS youre ranting about, if it was relevant enough im pretty sure he would address it, stop reaching

Employees are the most trustworthy source we have, we can't know if they lie or not, it's impossible. Unlike dogpack who has been proven to manipulate and make false allegations and therefore isn't trustworthy, dogpack also didn't wait for research to finish unlike soggy

he also didn’t mention the beast game and team sea things

@ermtosis  that's because he debunked dogpack


UPDATE: More Pegasus was planning to interview MrBeast online, but MrBeast dodged it in the last minute according to More Pegasus’ recent new community post.


Good job this is why you take these types of allegations with a grain of salt. Especially if the person worked there for only a month and openly admitted he was a disgruntled employee in his video.

Not to mention Jimmy still hasn't released his side of the story, but I guess now he doesn't really have to since legal action is already in the works. But I had no idea he was a Mr. Beast fanboy prior to becoming an employee. Now it kinda makes a bit more sense why he's going after him and not monetizing any of it. It's just petty revenge cause he got fired.

The fact that this is the only real comment with nuance and most are just a joke is upsetting to me thanks for posting this


What if THIS Video is Fake??? What is everything is faked?? Nothing is real. Still not worth my energy in doing my own research though.

Moral of the story: Both MrBeast and DogPack are bad people. DogPack should be off the internet and Jimmy should be in prison with Chris

Sounds like a generic quote for checking your sanity in a video game

@@dantdmfangamingrich9802 no way, Dogpack is still much worse person, if the crypto scam was confirmed then Mrbeast still much worser.

@@dantdmfangamingrich9802 The only real comment.


If you're going to include an interview with someone and are trying to present it as impartial, then you need to not ask leading questions. All of the questions you asked were yes or no questions. None of the statements being made (starting at 7:00) came out of Garrett's mouth, they came out of yours. This is a really poor way to frame questions and makes it sound like you're feeding him a narrative.

For instance, instead of asking "So was the entire call basically just rumors you were talking about with a friend?", the way to ask a proper question would be "How would you characterize that call?" You need to let him explain the answer, instead of doing it for him within the question itself. I was getting flashbacks to JAR "interviewing" Synnibear with every question you asked him.

If you're going to include an interview with someone and are trying to present it as impartial, then you need to not ask leading questions. All of the questions you asked were yes or no questions. None of the statements being made (starting at 7:00) came out of Garrett's mouth, they came out of yours. This is a really poor way to frame questions and makes it sound like you're feeding him a narrative.

For instance, instead of asking "So was the entire call basically just rumors you were talking about with a friend?", the way to ask a proper question would be "How would you characterize that call?" You need to let *him* explain the answer, instead of doing it for him within the question itself. I was getting flashbacks to JAR "interviewing" Synnibear with every question you asked him.


jesus, you have come so far soggy, keep it up! hopefully this video gets the attention it deserves


lets go another essay grabbing my popcorn


no shit, NPCS loved jumping on the cancel bandwagon.. dogpack is obviously a very smart but very unstable psycho that got fired within 2 weeks lol.

This is what me and other have been saying since the drama began, it’s nice to finally see other people acknowledging this as well.

Although apparently not smart enough to know that most of what he said can get him into legal troubles


Whole lot of character assassination and not much substance against the claims he makes, your evidence for debunking claims is “trust me bro”, or look at this current employee working for Mr beast, surely they won’t have a reason to lie.


None of this or Dawsons claims will matter in a few months anyway. Life goes on

Yeah fr. This drama ain't gonna stay that long.

How is faking signatures which is on video a CLAIM

not claims very fraudelent and slanderous things

@@joshuahsimons9587he claimed it was illegal, which it is not

Dawsons lies has ruined a bunch of peoples reputations in the process. Life may go on for you, but for the people in the crossfire, maybe not


"DogPack404 just ended his career"<br>MorePegasus new video probably

"DogPack404 just ended his career"
MorePegasus new video probably

I don't think Pegasus gonna milk Dogpack situation since he is a small YouTuber

What career? The only one who had a career besides exposing MrBeast was Rosanna Pansino

@@arielperez3613 I'm waiting for her response to defend her puppy against Soggy. It's going to be a blast, like the Nicholas DeOrio livestream meltdown.


*ALTERNATE TITLE

“ soggy cereal DOMINTATES submissive dogpack


When the random person you dislike for no reason gets exposed, so now you can shit on them


Here's a hot take: Both suck? But Mr Beast has a much bigger audience and thus bears responsibility.

Yes so true therefore it’s totally fine for dogpack to lie and manipulate the truth to further smear him


You’re incredible. I’ve known for months that Dawson wasn’t to be trusted, and I’m so glad it’s finally coming out.


I don't really care about Dogpack's character or motivations, what is much more compelling is the rot in a billion dollar institution like Mr.Beast and the platform that enables and relies on him.

Then why are you on this video at all if you don't even care?

@@g_ggle-sect. probably to see which accusations were true, considering how extreme some of them were (not defending mr breast, no way that guy has a skeleton-less closet)


It was so obvious that Dogpack was just a bitter employee and a quest for vengeance. IT WAS SO OBVIOUS FROM THE START.


Man downplayed the whole Delaware situation and Jake Weddle's situation. And the fact that Mrbeast commented here makes it very sus

Oh, but the fact that dogpack got fired after 20 days of working there makes him credible?

@@Robokoop4000 speaking of credibility, why did MrBeast only comment on videos that support him?

@@yano0734 you are stupid asf if you are actually asking that question

@@yano0734 Do you have a mental disability?

Even though I'm neutral, I definitely think that soggy was paid by mrbeast.

@@Robokoop4000 care to explain why MrBeast paid for Soggy's trip?

Yeah I do agree with a lot of points in this video but I don’t like how he downplayed the whole Jake weddle situation. Even if he agreed to it it’s still bad because MrBeast was exploiting his desperation for money for entertainment .


Didn’t even watch 6 mins of the video and I already wanna take back my previous comments from soggy’s last video. This is extremely well made and I am known for being quite gullible and believing a lot of stuff on the internet. Maybe I have to stop worshipping YouTubers thinking they’re nice people. 😅

Edit: just finished the entire video. And wow. Just wow.


the commentary channels are going to be fed by this for 10 millenniums


The problem with having nearly all the world's information at our fingertips is people have become so lazy to search if something if something said is true.


23:50 I love how he says "A LOT OF YOUTUBERS" when all the video are from MorePegasus


The takeaway from this is that MrBeast, as a top channel, uses classic tricks to squeeze attention and money out of its audience (that's what it takes to stay in top youtube), but is careful to remain as ethical and legal as possible. Although Jimmy has made some questionable decisions and mistakes, Dogpack is a manipulative asshole who cherry-picks "evidence" so he can push his opinions onto others, under the fake authority of having insider information as an ex-Beast employee

Not to mention, he took advantage of the Chris 'Ava' Tyson drama to boost himself, with some even crediting him for exposing Chris over the PDF/grooming accusations (even though he wasn't the one exposing Ava).

@@tobiasbayer4866 But that person accepted the challenge and has the right to leave whenever they want. So why didn't they?

@@tobiasbayer4866 it's a prison challenge, not a luxurious day spa challenge. What do you expect from maximum security challenge to feel like?

He got himself into the challenge and came out crying about it like Jimmy forced him.

Beside didn't he got 50k from it already?

@@tobiasbayer4866 it's a prison challenge, not a luxurious day spa challenge. What do you expect from maximum security challenge to feel like?

He got himself into the challenge and came out crying about it like Jimmy forced him.

Besides didn't he get 50k from it already?


I think this is a lesson the internet needed to learn.


I feel so stupid, thank you for making this video! So crazy to think that if dogpack acted less horribly to you, this video probably wouldn't have been made.


Is this video shadowbanned or something? Why is this so underviewed?

Idk maybe coz dogpack doesn't have a fraction of fame compared to mrbeast, Not defending dogpack but mrbeast definitly has done shady crap with so many of his old employees being fired and him being best friends with a pedo

@@RiskySandwich considering how important this video is in this drama stuff, this was supposed to be blown up. It's been a day and literally no one is talking about this

@@gekkouga2828 maybe just give it another day

@@agentwesker5237 I mean, I was expecting this video to be a huge talk in this community considering how much this drama is being milked out. It's been a day and no commentary channel is responding to this. I'm just curious

They can't handle the truth, it hurt their ego more

Bad thumbnail and title. Looks like a regular slop video about Mr Beast. No one is clicking that.

Cuz none of the drama channels have made videos on it

@@jeffjefforson1435 it takes only like few hours for all the drama channels to come out like flies towards like one thing about this stuff. No one responded to this from their socials and there's so much less noise about this in internet. 😅


Penguinz0 monotone reaction incoming. Can't wait for TomDark, PyroLive, and MorePegasus to milk this "insane situation" for weeks on end.

Dogpack situation is insane 🤓
Dogpack situation is crazy 🤓
It's OVER 🤓
It's DOGOVER! 🤓

Tom has been critical of dogpack ever since the James Warren false accusation


who am i going to trust? a random guy saying mr beast is a fraud and saying all of the claims he makes are true or someone i've been subscribed to for almost a year


Do your own research but soggy makes alot of good points, I personally think both sides are morally grey, mr beast is a scumbag but so is dogpack

@@RealHumanPersonOnEarth i feal that both sides is lacing and thats not good.


Even tho dog pack lied I still hate MrBeast

Yeah, me too mate. I still hate him. He ruined YouTube and still can't take any criticism.

Don’t blame him for other people coping him

@@epicgam3r737 before anyone say anything I’m not on anyone’s side I’m completely neutral on everything going on I just make a comment every now and I just hate people blaming others for something they didn’t do


He made Logan Paul win by cheating in one of the challenge.

He constantly changed terms during the live stream of T-shirt giveaway

He should add disclaimer that for safety reason they do change some things n videos are 90% real.

Many other things against him u left out..


Sad that this video isn't getting as many views as dogpacks.


The amount of logical fallacies and manipulative tactics in this video is crazy. I’m not out here supporting dogpack but god damn, this video is an ass expose. The lack of evidence and the mistreatment of any investigative process is stunning

I know right? The 2nd thing he said about the war crimes is straight up just straw manning the entire thing. Soggy's main defense for that ENTIRE segment was that "it wasn't a war crime!"

Sure, but that doesn't mean that Mr Beast is in the clear lmao, and it doesn't disprove Dogman or Weddle in any way either

Also there's proof for the two people in these replies saying "name one"


Don’t let this distract you from the fact Jon Jones has ducked Francis and Tom and shouldn’t be considered the goat of the ufc.

fr bro. dude's a cheat and doesn't deserve to be called goat of anything except hit&runs maybe


1:08 heh.… I guess you can say he found a “dollar in the woods”


I smell a “rise and fall of Dogpack404” coming


1:25:15 Out of all of these, only a few allegations remain.

-Faking Philanthropy videos
-Crypto Scam
-Only 1 illegal lottery (probably a mistake, but it was still bad that MrBeast didn't do anything to fix it until this day) And also MrBeast constantly changing the winners during his live streams was unacceptable.

He put both a cross and a tick on Jake Weddle?

-Beast Games Drama and mistreating contestants (no longer an allegation, the MrBeast team admitted that it was true). But the team said that they are working to resolve the issue.

Didn't the video literally adress the first one?

@@vxzdzd121 It only addressed MrBeast's normal videos not his Philanthropy videos.

@@TheTruePeoplez which video are you talking in about

@@vxzdzd121 I don't think he would ever fake those.  I don't remember those ever being under fire

Bonus one: giving adderall to his employees so they can work longer hours

@@LoonyCleo guy below me stole my words. True


Bro, this new title and thumbnail still ain’t it… It still looks like just another Mr Beast allegations coverage video like everyone else has done. It needs to be something like “DogPack404 lied to you and I have the proof” with Dawson’s face in the thumbnail.


Feel like this video did way more research than DogPack404, why so many people hating?

they are upset that they fail for a narrative.

they just really want mrbeast to be an evil villain for whatever reason..


Thank you for pointing out the fake UI it was bugging me that no one was talking about it.


i would disagree with your part on illegal lottery 2#. i know its ok for the employee to use mrb’s sig if he allowed. but he didn’t mention to the ppl who purchased the shirt that this happened and say that the shirt had mrb’s sig written by mrb and a member not a member did both of that. this would cause misconception upon buyers or people who want to sell it for profit

And also the guy at 57:10 didn't show any email from the Mr beast team that he was selected, how can we just trust this guy without any proof? He could just be some random dude talking nonsense

@@Thy_Dictatorafter this vid i think i would just stand in between 2 sides since both have some flaws in theirs claims. interviewing with mrb current employees cannot make sure since mrb might know this and tell them to say this to defame dogpack. denying mrb not manipulating the script is not ok since in 5v5 boys vs girls survivors contest there was a professional in girls team. the 10minute vid they hired a famous person who should have been lost during lazer challenge

@@attacong7779 Soggy also just skipped over the part in the 100 Girls vs 100Boys video, where Jimmy gives the only man that can solve the rubik's cube $10k to leave. After which he went to the girls, not to make the same offer to the only woman able to solve them, but instead tell them how he rigged the challenge for them.

@@Silas276in all fairness it's probably added to make the challenge more interesting

@@naganut9718 plus he was the guy who knew how to solve them. He probably would have been targeted to be eliminated with side money

@@attacong7779 that's what I was thinking. Current MrBeast employees would definitely say anything to please the company if it means keeping their jobs or getting a quick pay

@@naganut9718 it's still rigged after doing that, especially because of the lack of a similar offer to one of the girls.

@@erikshields3724 0/10 ragebait. do better😉

@Silas276  MrBeadt challlenges isn't always gonna be 100% fair. They're gonna have one or the other teams at a disadvantage to make the challenge interesting. I don't see anything wrong with that

@@naganut9718Then he can't declare his challenges are fair and not scripted when they are.

@@sontho6995 its still isn't overly imbalanced though?

@@naganut9718 Mentioning imbalance about a YouTuber's challenge videos doesn't work when there isn't any proper regulations about game shows on youtube, in fact there's little law regulations about what gets uploaded on the internet. No TV show can get away with the stuff Mr beast does because of things like the FCC.

@@sontho6995 yeah, Mr Beast isn't a gameshow. He's gonna have parts of his challenges that can be seemingly not fair. But its still not a highly imbalance that can ruin the whole challenge. Just a slight advantage or disadvantage

@@naganut9718 "Mr Beast isn't a gameshow" That's ironic cuz of his upcoming Amazon reality competition series. Him going out of his way to say that his competition videos are true, not staged, not edited is what led to this.

@sontho6995  the "it being true" still held. There's multiple evidence in this videos that the challenges that are "fake" can be easily debunked

@@naganut9718 And there's still other challenges that he presented as being valid and not staged when they were.


Mr beast is still a horrible boss and not a good person. Just look at his crypto history and his tweets about them. And he still uses kids to feed his money farm. And the whole Lunchly thing too is very very gross. Him working with Logan Paul and KSI. And a bunch more. Sure that dog dude sucked. But so does Jimmy.

Which....is something he addressed in the video.

The only thing that you can really critique him on now is his alleged crypto history

@@db1671 And he should be held accountable. Yet, I always knew that 99% was hogwash.


Mr Beast paid this guy to slander dogpack, Mr Beast hired a RSO and we all know it

watch the video before making a dumb comment

@@plpong893 there is no hard evidence, maybe you should watch dogpacks video before making a dumb comment

@@plpong893 but he literally did hire an RSO, the only thing that was disproven was that MrBeast didn’t intentionally hire Delaware, and also some minute details.  But the big problem with all of this is that he was employed by MrBeast, that is the issue that should’ve been focused on.  Regardless if it was intentional or not, he still did it.

@ Yeah, I get that. Maybe I could have worded my comment better. But my point still stands. I still think MrBeast is a scumbag, but DogPack404 is no different.

@@plpong893 No, your point is not valid because you are not spewing your opinion as fact. How much did Mr Beast pay you to support him?

@@plpong893 Why do you support pedophiles?

@@plpong893 You have no point, jog on mate

@@mohammed.shami1773 I literally said Mr. Beast was a scumbag in another comment, use your eyes and ears

@@PulseyPulsy how much did dogpack404 pay you


Great video, disproving a lot of allegations, one issue is that in the middle of debunking allegations, you spread one. Cam nuggets is the worst, he sucks. However that is not what happened. There is a lot of context to that message that you left out

EDIT: He has since responded on a livestream with Lerix, I assume he's going to make another more public response. I retract my statements, because it looks like he's retracted his accusations against Camnuggets. He has now agreed to remove that part from the video.

grate video, you manipulated this aspect of the messages and so have lied to the youtube audience.........yup A FUGGING + .........this video suxs

Let me guess.. “it’s just a joke” or it’s “out of context”

@@ChrisMiIesChongno. He was in an NSFW chat and a kid got in. On the vc the minor was recording their butthole, the message was him reporting it so the minor could be banned.

@ChrisMiIesChong  no, he reported an event that Camnuggets had nothing to do with, other than him being there and being the one to report the issue to the server staff. yes they should've vetted the people going into the server, however that is not on Cam Nuggets. He was not just watching a kid make cp, he was reporting a minor to get them out of the chat.


As long as you don't jump to conclusions and defend his allegations in every commentary channel (Pegasus, for example), I think you're good.

Finally someone who is neutral and actually advises people instead of saying to side with one


Thank God I didn't waste my time watching the full videos of DogPack

yep, me too but I don’t feel proud because now I just feel like a total sheep for believing all the allegations, he said (dog pack)

@@barzap6190and you don’t feel like a total sheep for believing this video paid for by Mr beast?


Can anyone explain to me how 13:44 is not a war crime. They literally show in the text that sleep deprivation is a form of war crime and is exactly what they did to him by refusing to turn off the lights. It shouldn’t matter if the guy said it as a joke or not, it’s still a warcrime

I don't think it would be considered a war crime because he could leave at any time.  Don't get me wrong, it was incredibly shitty of them to do that, but not a war crime.

1. they're not at war. not a war crime<br>2. they can leave any time they want.

1. they're not at war. not a war crime
2. they can leave any time they want.

@ Yeah I get what you mean. But then he would lose the money he had potential to win so he can’t really just leave. But yeah you’re probably right about it not being a war crime then but I personally think it should still count as it

@@imcalledcool dude thats ridiculous. if you think letting contestants challenge themselves in a bright room for a cash prize is a war crime, wait till you find out what an isreali bomb does to a baby in a palestinian residential building. ridiculous.

the key is the last word. "detainees". he was not a detainee, he could leave at any time

could it still be argued as unethical due to how encouraged he was to stay? certainly.

but it was not a warcrime, also its an ai summery anyway i wouldn't trust it.

@@DJTAUR not a war crime since they are not at war, are apart of a privte entiy and can leave anytime they want. if they cant leave it,that would be considered a human rights violation, not a warcime


So basically Beast is not quite as bad as alleged and Dogpack and Jake aren't absolute angels? Damn, that's kinda crazy bro. I almost give a damn.

Neither party should be believed. Not dogpack, not beast, not you, not randomsloptuber number 3000. This should be handeled in court, not by random basement dwellers who have nothing better to do than to make a spectacle of these crimes and lies.


I’m glad to have found Stucky’s channel after waiting since I had a suspicious gut feeling about DogPack. Sure enough my gut feeling was correct. Also Megasus is gonna have to delete those videos after milking the entire thing, if he milks this tho I pray he gets made fun of even more for it

hypersus lovee to milk cows more than fidel castro


This video is most definitely paid for by mr beast